Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10/21/2025 - Formal Meeting - Meeting Materials
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING October 21, 2025 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings. Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chris Wharton, Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy, Vice Chair District 2 Victoria Petro District 1 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7 Generated: 13:12:09 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Dan Dugan will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of February 18, 2025, and June 3, 2025. 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing October as Italian-American Heritage Month. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 – B4 will be heard as one public hearing. 1. Grant Application: City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) Design Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Community Reinvestment Agency to the Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation. If awarded, the grant would increase accessible multi-modal connections, recreational amenities (skate park) and green spaces on the Westside. Funds would also strengthen the Folsom Trail, which connects a TRAX/Frontrunner stop to the Jordan River Trail, and the future Power District. These projects align with the priorities in the Utah Outdoor Recreation Strategic Plan. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 2. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2025-26 Local Law Enforcement Grants for Enforcement of Cybercrimes Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW). If awarded, the grant would fund travel/training costs, overtime for those who are training and attending, emergency housing and transportation for cybercrime victims, and an enhanced response to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, stalking, dating violence and trafficking. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 3. Grant Application: Jordan River Water Trail River Restoration and Recreation Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Public Lands Department, Trails and Natural Lands Division to the Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation. If awarded, the grant would fund 36 blocks of debris clearing provided by Diamond Tree Experts. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 4. Grant Application: Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Public Lands Department to the Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands. If awarded, the grant would fund the removal of dead trees, branches and debris from the Jordan River Water Trail corridor to enhance safety and accessibility, working from 1700 South to 900 South. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. 5. Ordinance: Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to residential buffer prohibitions. The proposal would review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The proposal also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01357. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6. Ordinance: Utility Installation Exemptions Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to utility installation exemptions. The proposal would clarify the application of utility exemptions and standardize the footnotes in related land use tables. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7. Ordinance: Patriot Rail Street Vacations at Approximately 6500 West Interstate 80 Eastbound Freeway The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would close portions of the public right-of-way at approximately 6500 West Interstate 80 Eastbound Freeway. The proposal would allow the petitioner to purchase these portions of right-of-way to include in their property boundary for future railroad-related uses. There are no existing structures on the property. These are areas that were platted and dedicated to the City for use as public streets but were never constructed. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway, the property owners. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00432. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 8. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for the Youth & Family Division in support of YouthCity afterschool programs, funding for the National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit being held in November in Salt Lake City, funding for the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system, funding for additional Green Bike stations, and grant funding to support victims of violent crimes, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 and Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 9. 2026-2027 U.S. Housing and Urban Development General Community Development Needs Annual Public Hearing The Council will accept public comment for the 2026-2027 U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) General Community Development Needs. Each year Salt Lake City receives several million dollars in grants from HUD for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), and Housing Opportunities for Persons With HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) programs. HUD requires an annual public hearing for the City to hear about community development needs from the public. This feedback helps to prioritize the grant funds between many competing needs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 10. Public Hearing: 203 West Paxton Avenue Affordable Housing Development The Council will accept public comment for the Pax Station Apartment project, a 272- unit affordable housing project at 203 West Paxton Avenue, which would be funded through a tax-exempt private activity bond (PAB) issued by the Public Finance Authority of Wisconsin. The development entails no financial liability for Salt Lake City, but Federal regulations for tax-exempt PABs require the Council to hold what is known as a TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) public hearing on this proposal. No other Council action is required. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Resolution: Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would reallocate $230,306 in U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) HOME-American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds. Since these funds were allocated in 2024, Housing Stability Division staff and the service providers have recognized the need for case management to support some of the households receiving Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. Shifting funds to the Supportive Services category will enable the contracted organizations to provide this additional service while remaining within the City’s existing HUD allocation. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Ordinance: Partial Street Vacation at Approximately 1101 West 400 South The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would close a portion of the public right-of-way on both 1100 West and 400 South adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South. The closure would facilitate the future construction of a new single- family residence on the property. The petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area is approximately five feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Erik Sansom, property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00178. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 and Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) E.NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund - Rich’s Grub Houses LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $40,000 loan for Rich’s Grub Houses LLC doing business as Rich’s Burgers N Grub at 30 East Broadway from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Rich’s Burgers N Grub is an existing restaurant offering burgers and sandwiches. This loan would pay for machinery and equipment, and leasehold improvements. It would also help create two to four new jobs in the next year and retain eight current jobs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would approve the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan, which includes information such as demographics, a hazard profile, and identified necessary/potential mitigation projects to minimize damage and loss of life. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires these updates every five years for an entity to be eligible for pre-disaster mitigation funds and post-disaster assistance. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2. Resolution: Salt Lake Central Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Interlocal Agreement The Council will consider adopting the proposed Salt Lake Central Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone (HTRZ) Interlocal Agreement to authorize the sharing of tax increment between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA). The State code requires the City and CRA to enter into an interlocal agreement to release funds to the project area. The HTRZ Plan outlines the participating taxing entities, tax increment participation rates, the term of tax increment collection, and the planned utilization of tax increment funds in the project area. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 14, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code related to RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District) to RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District). As part of the proposal a small number of RMF-35 properties would be changed to RMF-45. The proposal aims to remove barriers to new housing developments and facilitate compatible infill within the City’s moderate-density neighborhoods. These proposed updates introduce design standards for new development, reduce minimum lot size requirements, eliminate lot width minimums, permit multiple buildings per lot, and offer a density bonus for preserving existing housing units. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01388. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/RMFZoneUpdates. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would adopt the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Code, a state fire code that the City is required to adopt, along with a map that shows where the WUI Fire Code would apply. The proposal would also amend Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to give precedence to the adopted WUI Code where it conflicts with regulations, with the exception of the Riparian Corridor Overlay. The WUI code regulates certain building materials, construction requirements, building separation, and landscaping provisions to reduce the risk of fire. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Brian Conley The Council will consider approving the appointment of Brian Conley, resident of District 5, to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 25, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 14, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 4. Board Appointment: City and County Building Conservation and Use Committee – Nicholas Pedersen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Nicholas Pedersen, resident of District 2, to the City and County Building Conservancy and Use Committee for a term ending July 16, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 5. Board Appointment: Art Design Board – Amanda Stewart The Council will consider approving the appointment of Amanda Stewart, resident of District 7, to the Art Design Board for a term ending October 21, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 6. Board Appointment: Historic Landmark Commission – Taymour Semnani The Council will consider approving the appointment of Taymour Semnani, resident of District 4, to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending October 21, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. H.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 16, 2025, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, February 18, 2025. The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative Leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant The meeting was called to order at 7:04 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of November 19, 2024, as well as the formal meeting minutes of January 7, 2025. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the meeting minutes of November 19,2024 and the Formal meeting minutes of January 7, 2025. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 & B2 will be heard as one public hearing. 1. Grant Application: Loan from the Department of Environmental Quality The Council will accept public comment for a loan the City applied for and was awarded by the Department of Public Utilities to the State of Utah: Department of Environmental Quality Drinking Water Board. The loan will fund the planning and design costs to address contamination in the 4th Avenue Well. While this is a loan and not a grant, the mechanism for receiving the money is like a grant. Due to the unique requirements of this loan, the management of funds will follow grant approval and reimbursement processes. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. See item B2 for minutes and council action. 2. Grant Application: Bureau of Emergency Management Per Capita Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. If awarded, the grant would fund medical supplies for emergency medical services. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 2 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Summary: Silvia Richards introduced the item. Public Comments: Phil Thapolis expressed frustration and raised concerns regarding utility company activity, including whether permits were in place, the nature of the services being offered, and possible effects on the community. Bob Ferris expressed frustration and raised concerns regarding utility company activity, including whether permits were in place, the nature of the services being offered, and possible effects on the community. Phil Anderson expressed frustration and raised concerns regarding utility company activity... This public comment was concluded early at the Chair’s request. Jennifer Bruno noted that each person is limited to two minutes of comment time, regardless of the number of times they are registered. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer items B1 and B2 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.3 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 3 including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2024-25. The proposed amendment includes infrastructure development on the Fleet Block, several vehicles for various City operations, including a Justice Bus (mobile courtroom), and protecting the Great Salt Lake watershed, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 11 of 2025, amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2024 - 2025, specifically addressing all of the remaining requests except item A-2, with the understanding that the Council approved the Cybersecurity Engineer Position at a previous meeting and the request for the Graphic Design position can be reconsidered during the upcoming annual budget deliberations. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions from the Council to the Mayor. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Jerry Schmidt spoke on Senate Bill 197 and the concerns if passed regarding property tax protections and financial aid assistance that could be removed from senior citizens and widows, and went on to request that Salt Lake City speak in opposition to the proposed legislation. Mona M thanked the Council and Mayor for their commitment to the community and expressed concerns over Scientology. Audilia Weiland spoke on Scientology and its effects on the community. Bernie Hart took a moment of silence. Cheneil Hill expressed concern regarding corruption and fraud among 501(c)(3) religious organizations, and requested policy and action from the City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4 Cindy Cromer spoke regarding a proposed resolution for 704 East 900 South and requested a review of the legal requirements being met by other developers. Keenen Ruple stated they were homeless in Salt Lake City and took a moment of silence. Jennifer Haertel stated they were with part of the unhoused in Salt Lake City and took a moment of silence. Jack Kozacik expressed concerns regarding the Salt Lake City Police Department, its practices, and protocols. Paul Nielson expressed excitement for the appointment of Mark Kittrell as City Attorney. Erica DeWitt spoke on the Utah Bill allowing historically discriminatory flags and symbols while banning inclusive symbols, such as the Pride Flag, in schools. E.NEW BUSINESS: 1. Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund - Policy Kings Brewery, LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $75,000 loan for Policy Kings Brewery, LLC. at 79 West 900 South from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Policy Kings Brewery, LLC. is Utah’s first black-owned brewery relocating from Cedar City to Salt Lake City and is known for its craft beer, arts and music. This loan will assist in the creation of 15 new jobs in the next year and the retention of 15 current jobs. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Ordinance 10 of 2025, approving a $75,000 loan for Policy Kings Brewery, LLC from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2. Resolution: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 704 East 900 South Extension The Council will consider adopting a resolution extending the time period for satisfying the conditions set forth in Ordinance No.6 of 2023 rezoning the property at MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 5 approximately 704 East 900 South from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to SNB (Small Neighborhood Business). The deadline extension would give the property owner an additional six months to satisfy the conditions of the ordinance. Council Remarks: Council Member Mano stated that he would support the resolution and expressed hesitancy in voting in favor of future extensions for this project. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 04 of 2025, extending the time period to comply with the conditions in Ordinance 06 of 2023 for an additional 6 months. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro NAY: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 1 Pass 3. Ordinance: Enacting a Temporary Land Use Regulation - Public School Development Standards The Council will consider adopting an Ordinance enacting a Temporary Land Use Regulation that would change zoning standards for K-12 public school development in the Public Lands District. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt Ordinance 12 of 2025, Enacting a Temporary Land Use Regulation – Public School Development Standards. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4. Advice and Consent: Salt Lake City Attorney – Mark Kittrell The Council will consider approving the appointment of Mark Kittrell as the Salt Lake City Attorney. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the appointment of Mark Kittrell as the Salt Lake City Attorney. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 6 AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE. G.CONSENT: 1. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Funding Allocations for One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 4, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants and adopt the One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The plan includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HOME Investment Partnership Program funding, Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funding, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding. The resolution would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This year, the Council will also consider funding recommendations for one-time federal pandemic- related grants for tenant-based rental assistance authorized by the American Rescue Plan Act and CDBG coronavirus response CARES Act funds. For more information visit www.tinyurl.com/annualhudgrants. 2. 2025-29 Housing and Urban Development Consolidated Plan Update and Timeline The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 4, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving the City’s next five-year Consolidated Plan for 2025-29 as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Consolidated Plan details the City’s goals and objectives that determine funding eligibility and prioritize how to spend four federal grants: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), Home Investment Partnerships, and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 7 3. Ordinance: Alley Vacation between 1161 South 300 West and 268 West Paxton Avenue The Council will set the date of Tuesday, March 4, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate an L-shaped City-owned alley that begins at approximately 268 West Paxton Avenue. The proposal would create an easement beginning at 300 West to provide access for abutting property owners. Located within Council District 5. Petitioner: RCB Rental Properties and Little Garage, Inc. Petition No.: PLNPCM2022-01128. 4. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.3) for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.3) for Fiscal Year 2024-25. 5. Board Appointment: Business Advisory Board – Alyn Toalepai The Council will consider approving the appointment of Alyn Toalepai to the Business Advisory Board for a term ending December 31, 2029. 6. Board Appointment: Human Rights Commission – Channae Haller The Council will consider approving the appointment of Channae Haller to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 31, 2029. 7. Board Reappointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Ashley Lodmell The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Ashley Lodmell to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending February 18, 2028. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt the Consent Agenda. . MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 8 AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 9 Meeting adjourned at 7:42 pm Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, February 18, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 18, 2025 10 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff, Danny Walz – Community Reinvestment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 2 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will continue to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Board Member Wharton, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 3 Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item; there was no public comment. C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to adjourn as the LBA and convene as the CRA. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 4 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will continue to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item; there was no public comment. Motion: Moved by Director Lopez Chavez, seconded by Director Wharton to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass E.CRA ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 5 Motion: Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Lopez Chavez to adjourn as the CRA and convene as the City Council. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1. 2. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the work session meeting minutes of February 4, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Ordinances and Resolutions listed below (G1 – G15) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. All items will be heard as one public hearing. 1.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the Budget for the Library Fund The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 7 Welcome to the Public Meeting Rules The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 4, 2025. Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 2.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 3.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 4.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 8 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 5.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers and Executive Municipal Officers The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 6.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9 TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 7.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 8.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 10 9.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 10.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 11.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 11 Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 12.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would amend section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the last annual budget. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 13.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Compiling with Rate Study and Regulatory Requirements The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance would amend Chapter 17of the Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply with regulatory requirements. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 14.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget: Capital Improvement Program The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). 15.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes Implementation The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in 2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 13 Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to close the public hearing and refer items G1 – G15 to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item, stating that all items were being held as one public hearing for the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for FY 2025-26. Public Comments: Evan Sugden spoke to a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) request not being funded for high-end bicycle parking and to cooperation with the City for more bike racks at The Milk Block and Downtown Library. Esther Hunter spoke to a CIP request from the East Central Community that included a maintenance implementation plan for the 1200 East islands that were in need of repair. Matthew Morriss spoke on a CIP request for speed reduction measures on 800 West in the Glendale neighborhood, requesting that funding be used to create a safer environment and mitigate the damage and danger caused by speeding vehicles. Kelbe Goupil spoke on a CIP request for traffic calming measures in the Glendale neighborhood along 800 West and requested that these safety measures be funded in the community. Avery Edenfield spoke to a CIP request for pedestrian safety and installation of a High-Intensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK) in Richmond and Zenith in the Brickyard community, and requested that safety measures be installed to help pedestrian traffic in the Brickyard area near Millcreek Commons. Kimball Young spoke on the health and well-being of Salt Lake City being directly reflected in the condition of the streets in our community, requested that funding be allocated to improve road conditions around the city. Tina Hernandez spoke on the need for improved pedestrian safety at crosswalks be implemented in District 7 on Zenith Street, stating the current signage was inadequate, cars created unsafe conditions in the neighborhood, and a recent rear-end accident created an urgent need to address these safety issues. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 14 John Woeste (Westy) spoke about the unsafe road conditions within Salt Lake City and requested that the Texas Street CIP be funded to help create a safer community and replace the current deteriorating road on this street. Council Comments: Council Member Young thanked the community for attending and advocating for their interests, providing solutions to help create change and making the city a safer place. Council Member Mano clarified that the budget adoption in the coming weeks would include the amount allocated to the CIP program, and specific projects would be approved to fund later in the year. Jennifer Bruno provided the upcoming timeline for the final CIP funding. H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions for the Mayor. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Frederick Jenny spoke on the policy requirements for the Granary District Plans and burying the rails along 500 West. Stephen Otterstrom spoke on the recent sales tax adopted by the City, stating it was not beneficial to the community, and requested that simple community needs be funded before projects that increased the community's financial burden. Cheneil Hill spoke on a legislative initiative proposed by the Stand Against Fear and Exploitation (SAFE) nonprofit organization, requesting the Council's support for a sex offender registry violation accountability act to strengthen penalties for violating the terms of the registry. Eduardo Guzman spoke on behalf of the Carpenters Union Local 801, stating labor brokers were creating unfair job opportunities by offering cash bids and payments to labor contractors, and requested city intervention to protect Union members. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 15 Vidal Miranda, a member of Carpenters Union Local 801, spoke about the unfair practices of labor brokers who create opportunities that are not in the best interest of certified, accredited union members seeking employment, and requested city intervention to protect the Union and its members. J.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund - Hruskas LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $200,000 loan for Hruskas, LLC. at 1751 South 1100 East from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Hruskas, LLC. takeout restaurant offering sweet and savory kolaches stuffed pastries. This loan will assist in the creation of two new jobs in the next year and the retention of nine current jobs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 30 of 2025, approving a $200,000 loan for Hruskas LLC from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 The Council will consider adopting a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $700 million aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2025, for the purpose of financing and refinancing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 16 Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 14 of 2025, adopting the bond parameters and recognizing the date to set a public hearing on the bond issuance for July 1, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $700 million aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2025, for the purpose of financing and refinancing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 128 North N Street The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting and ordinance that would amend the zoning for the property at approximately 128 North N Street from the SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District). The MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 17 proposal would enable the development of three residential infill rental housing units behind the primary structure on the property. The property sits on the East side of N Street one parcel south of the corner of N Street and 3rd Avenue. The property is located in the Avenues Local Historic District. The existing structure is rated as contributing to the historic district and would not be altered under the proposal. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 3. Petitioner: John Van Trigt, the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01079. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.5) for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.5) for Fiscal Year 2024-25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Approve. 4.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Aleksei Hernandez-Nietling The Council will consider approving the appointment of Aleksei Hernandez-Nietling to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for a term ending December 27, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 18 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 19 Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m. Council Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] CRA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] LBA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 3, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 20 transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 21 JOINT RESOLUTION DECLARING OCTOBER 2025 ITALIAN-AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH IN SALT LAKE CITY WHEREAS, Salt Lake City is home to a vibrant assembly of diverse individuals from a multitude of backgrounds, including the proud and longstanding Italian- Americans; and WHEREAS, Italian immigrants helped shape the economic and industrial development of Utah and Salt Lake City during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, contributing essential labor in the mining and railroad industries and helping to form a central hub for these immigrants as they established families, homes, and institutions; and WHEREAS, Italian-Americans have made notable contributions to various fields , enriching the cultural tapestry of our city through their traditions and values and leaving a lasting legacy; and WHEREAS, Italian-Americans formed strong mutual aid and civic organizations, including the Italian-American Civic League, established in Utah on January 18, 1934, which remains active today and continues to support community engagement and charitable efforts; and WHEREAS, in 1989, Congress officially designated the month of October as Italian - American Heritage Month to celebrate the heritage and culture; WHEREAS, the construction of Interstate 15 in the mid-20th century led to the displacement of many Italian-American families and businesses, particularly those rooted in Salt Lake City's west side, disrupting a once -thriving cultural community; WHEREAS, this historical displacement underscores the importance of acknowledging and preserving the local contributions, heritage, and resilience of Italian -Americans in Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS, Italian-Americans have preserved their unique cultural heritage through festivals, events, and organizations, fostering a sense of unity and pride within the Italian-American community, strengthening community bonds, and fostering a more inclusive and connected city. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Salt Lake City Council and the Mayor of Salt Lake City hereby recognize the month of October as Italian-American Heritage Month in our city , extend their appreciation, and encourage all residents to join in celebrating the contributions and culture of Italian-Americans. Adopted this 21st day of October 2025. Items B1-B4 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: October 21, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes; $150,000 Source: cash from CRA has budgeted the funds towards designs as a voluntary match. -0-Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stake- holder involvement. If approved the grant would fund the design of the City Creek Daylighting Project including a skate park, and green spaces. It would also bolster Folsom Trail which connects TRAX/Front- runner stop to Jordan River Trail. Note: Public Utilities & Public Lands are aware of the grant and are supportive. See additional info below. Needs Public Hearing No $1,150,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation CRA (Community Reinvestment Agency) 2.No.-0-Local Law Enforce- ment of Cybercrimes Program Training, overtime, video and display technology, Subaward to YWCA of $50,000, enhanced investigations, assessing and improving responses to cybercrimes. Needs Public Hearing No $700,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) Police Dept. 3.Yes; $106,000 Source: cash match from Public Lands Dept. budget -0-Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation (ORI) Remove hazardous debris and revitalize nine miles of the Jordan River. Needs Public Hearing No $666,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation Public Lands Dept., Trails & Natural Lands Division 4.Yes; $85,000 Source: Trails & Natural Lands Division budget for debris removal con- tractors. -0-Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program This is the next phase of removing decades-worth of dead and obstructing trees, branches. Needs Public Hearing No $85,000 Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Public Lands The following information was provided by the Administration in response to questions from Council Staff: 1.Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail Grant – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stakeholder involvement). Question: Are public lands and public utilities part of the grant process and planning for it, since they have other projects or involvement? Public Lands and Public Utilities were made aware that the CRA is pursuing grant funding to get final designs. They were supportive, emphasizing the emphasizing the need for their involvement in the design and engineering. They may have a decent lift, considering the amount of designing left to be done. FYI, for this program, the proposals will need to be presented to the Outdoor Recreation Commission for their ranking process. We were informed that the scheduled date for both of our proposals will be on Monday, October 20th. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Richard Lory DATE: September 2, 2025 SUBJECT: ORI City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail - Design FUNDING AGENCIES: Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation GRANT PROGRAM: Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $1,150,000 DEPARTMENT: Community Reinvestment Agency COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Seven Canyons Trust DATE SUBMITTED: 09/01/2025 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only -- (Design and Engineering) Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Please see below Match Required __$150,000__________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation’s newer program, the Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI), is for large planning and construction projects that align with the priorities in the Utah Outdoor Recreation Strategic Plan. The City Creek Daylighting Project aligns with the Plan by increasing accessible multimodal connections, recreational amenities (such as a skate park), and green spaces within the underserved Westside. In addition, this Project bolsters the Folsom Trail which connects a notable TRAX/Frontrunner stop to the Jordan River Trail, and the future Power District, increasing economic potential. This ORI proposal is to complete the design work, explore the feasibility of a phased construction, and achieve shovel readiness for future funding opportunities. The scope starts with a new feasibility study and ends with final designs, engaging stakeholders along the way. Some design work, and much public engagement, has already taken place and this effort will build upon that. The Community Reinvestment Agency has already budgeted $150,000 to go toward designs, and so that will be used as a voluntary match (increasing application competitiveness). This will be an interdepartmental effort with Public Lands and Public Utilities having major parts to play due to their responsibilities should the Project be constructed. The nonprofit organization, Seven Canyons Trust, who partnered with the CRA to develop the 2023 Daylighting Design Plan, aided in this grant application and will stay engaged throughout. Items B1-B4 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: October 21, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes; $150,000 Source: cash from CRA has budgeted the funds towards designs as a voluntary match. -0-Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stake- holder involvement. If approved the grant would fund the design of the City Creek Daylighting Project including a skate park, and green spaces. It would also bolster Folsom Trail which connects TRAX/Front- runner stop to Jordan River Trail. Note: Public Utilities & Public Lands are aware of the grant and are supportive. See additional info below. Needs Public Hearing No $1,150,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation CRA (Community Reinvestment Agency) 2.No.-0-Local Law Enforce- ment of Cybercrimes Program Training, overtime, video and display technology, Subaward to YWCA of $50,000, enhanced investigations, assessing and improving responses to cybercrimes. Needs Public Hearing No $700,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) Police Dept. 3.Yes; $106,000 Source: cash match from Public Lands Dept. budget -0-Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation (ORI) Remove hazardous debris and revitalize nine miles of the Jordan River. Needs Public Hearing No $666,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation Public Lands Dept., Trails & Natural Lands Division 4.Yes; $85,000 Source: Trails & Natural Lands Division budget for debris removal con- tractors. -0-Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program This is the next phase of removing decades-worth of dead and obstructing trees, branches. Needs Public Hearing No $85,000 Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Public Lands The following information was provided by the Administration in response to questions from Council Staff: 1.Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail Grant – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stakeholder involvement). Question: Are public lands and public utilities part of the grant process and planning for it, since they have other projects or involvement? Public Lands and Public Utilities were made aware that the CRA is pursuing grant funding to get final designs. They were supportive, emphasizing the emphasizing the need for their involvement in the design and engineering. They may have a decent lift, considering the amount of designing left to be done. FYI, for this program, the proposals will need to be presented to the Outdoor Recreation Commission for their ranking process. We were informed that the scheduled date for both of our proposals will be on Monday, October 20th. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Laura Nygaard DATE: August 21, 2025 SUBJECT: OVW FY25 Local Law Enforcement Grants for Enforcement of Cybercrimes Program FUNDING AGENCIES: United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) GRANT PROGRAM: OVW FY 2025 Local Law Enforcement Grants for Enforcement of Cybercrimes REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $700,000 DEPARTMENT: Police COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A DATE SUBMITTED: August 12, 2025 SPECIFICS: X Equipment/Supplies Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New X Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Please see below Match Required ______________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Police Department has applied for the OVW FY25 Local Law Enforcement Grants for Enforcement of Cybercrimes Program grant. The application includes a request for funds totaling $700,000.00 for the following: • Travel training costs for OVW required training as well as cybercrime trainings ∼ $191,304 • OT for staff providing and receiving training ∼ $13,000 • OT for staff investigating cybercrimes ∼ $180,600 • Supplies ∼ $3,000 • Video viewing and display technology package and installation ∼ $262,096 • Subaward to YWCA Utah to provide emergency housing and transportation to victims of cybercrimes that intersect with domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, stalking, trafficking, etc. ∼ $50,000 • If awarded, the Police Department will enhance the response to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence and stalking and technology-facilitated abuse/cybercrimes against individuals by 1) training SLCPD employees and SLC dispatchers; 2) enhancing victim and community awareness; 3) enhancing investigations with technology; 4) providing overtime for investigators; 5) continuing coordinated community response (CCR) work to assess and improve responses to cybercrimes against individuals within the first 6 months of the award; and 6) subawarding funds to YWCA Utah to provide victim services. • If awarded, the project period of the award is for 36 months, anticipated to begin 10/1/2025 through 9/30/2028. Items B1-B4 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: October 21, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes; $150,000 Source: cash from CRA has budgeted the funds towards designs as a voluntary match. -0-Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stake- holder involvement. If approved the grant would fund the design of the City Creek Daylighting Project including a skate park, and green spaces. It would also bolster Folsom Trail which connects TRAX/Front- runner stop to Jordan River Trail. Note: Public Utilities & Public Lands are aware of the grant and are supportive. See additional info below. Needs Public Hearing No $1,150,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation CRA (Community Reinvestment Agency) 2.No.-0-Local Law Enforce- ment of Cybercrimes Program Training, overtime, video and display technology, Subaward to YWCA of $50,000, enhanced investigations, assessing and improving responses to cybercrimes. Needs Public Hearing No $700,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) Police Dept. 3.Yes; $106,000 Source: cash match from Public Lands Dept. budget -0-Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation (ORI) Remove hazardous debris and revitalize nine miles of the Jordan River. Needs Public Hearing No $666,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation Public Lands Dept., Trails & Natural Lands Division 4.Yes; $85,000 Source: Trails & Natural Lands Division budget for debris removal con- tractors. -0-Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program This is the next phase of removing decades-worth of dead and obstructing trees, branches. Needs Public Hearing No $85,000 Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Public Lands The following information was provided by the Administration in response to questions from Council Staff: 1.Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail Grant – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stakeholder involvement). Question: Are public lands and public utilities part of the grant process and planning for it, since they have other projects or involvement? Public Lands and Public Utilities were made aware that the CRA is pursuing grant funding to get final designs. They were supportive, emphasizing the emphasizing the need for their involvement in the design and engineering. They may have a decent lift, considering the amount of designing left to be done. FYI, for this program, the proposals will need to be presented to the Outdoor Recreation Commission for their ranking process. We were informed that the scheduled date for both of our proposals will be on Monday, October 20th. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Annie Christensen DATE: September 2, 2025 SUBJECT: ORI Grant - Jordan River Water Trail River Restoration & Recreation FUNDING AGENCIES: Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation GRANT PROGRAM: Outdoor Recreation Initiative REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $666,000 DEPARTMENT: Public Lands Department, Trails and Natural Lands Division COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: 8/29/25 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Please see below Match Required __$106,500____________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Jordan River Water Trail Restoration & Recreation Project revitalizes nine miles of the Jordan River by removing hazardous vegetation to improve safety, navigation, and habitat. This shovel-ready effort addresses years of neglect, creating an urban oasis that supports boating, fishing, birdwatching, and community gathering. Aligning with state recreation priorities, it enhances access, benefits underserved neighborhoods, and ensures long-term care of a vital regional resource. $666,000 of ORI funding is requested to fund 36 blocks of debris clearing, contracted with Diamond Tree Experts. This is matched by $106,500 cash match from Salt Lake City Public Lands Department, Trails and Natural Lands Division. Items B1-B4 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: October 21, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 through B-4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes; $150,000 Source: cash from CRA has budgeted the funds towards designs as a voluntary match. -0-Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stake- holder involvement. If approved the grant would fund the design of the City Creek Daylighting Project including a skate park, and green spaces. It would also bolster Folsom Trail which connects TRAX/Front- runner stop to Jordan River Trail. Note: Public Utilities & Public Lands are aware of the grant and are supportive. See additional info below. Needs Public Hearing No $1,150,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation CRA (Community Reinvestment Agency) 2.No.-0-Local Law Enforce- ment of Cybercrimes Program Training, overtime, video and display technology, Subaward to YWCA of $50,000, enhanced investigations, assessing and improving responses to cybercrimes. Needs Public Hearing No $700,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) Police Dept. 3.Yes; $106,000 Source: cash match from Public Lands Dept. budget -0-Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation (ORI) Remove hazardous debris and revitalize nine miles of the Jordan River. Needs Public Hearing No $666,000 Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation Public Lands Dept., Trails & Natural Lands Division 4.Yes; $85,000 Source: Trails & Natural Lands Division budget for debris removal con- tractors. -0-Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program This is the next phase of removing decades-worth of dead and obstructing trees, branches. Needs Public Hearing No $85,000 Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Public Lands The following information was provided by the Administration in response to questions from Council Staff: 1.Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting at Folsom Trail Grant – Design Work (also includes feasibility study, final designs and stakeholder involvement). Question: Are public lands and public utilities part of the grant process and planning for it, since they have other projects or involvement? Public Lands and Public Utilities were made aware that the CRA is pursuing grant funding to get final designs. They were supportive, emphasizing the emphasizing the need for their involvement in the design and engineering. They may have a decent lift, considering the amount of designing left to be done. FYI, for this program, the proposals will need to be presented to the Outdoor Recreation Commission for their ranking process. We were informed that the scheduled date for both of our proposals will be on Monday, October 20th. Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Annie Christensen DATE: August 14, 2025 SUBJECT: Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program Application FUNDING AGENCIES: Utah DNR Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands GRANT PROGRAM: Jordan River Corridor Improvement Grant Program REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $85,000 DEPARTMENT: Public Lands COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: 8/13/25 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Please see below Match Required _____$85,000_________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands is now entering its next phase of removing decades-worth of dead and obstructing trees, branches and organic debris from the Jordan River Water Trail corridor to enhance safe and accessible non-motorized watercraft navigation. This project will enhance the City’s Jordan River Water Trail, along with its completed and future boat ramp improvements and water trail amenities, becoming a vibrant recreational resource destination, and rehabilitated natural open space within the City’s diverse west side neighborhoods. The anticipated project timeline will span either late September through early October 2025, or April through May 2026, depending on award timing. The goal of this phase of Jordan River maintenance is to remove the dead trees and branches and improve tree canopy health from nine blocks of riverway to prevent debris from falling in the river in the future. We aim to complete this project in approximately six weeks, with one to two blocks cleared per week, starting at 1700 South and working downstream towards 900 South. Item B5 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions PLNPCM2024-01357 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions PLNPCM2024-01357 BRIEFING UPDATE During the September 2, 2025 briefing Council Members clarified what zoning districts would be impacted by the proposed changes, and that the intent is not to prevent residential development. A question was raised about the impact of including mixed use districts in the proposal. Planning staff sent a follow-up memo (attached at the end of this report) noting that indoor live performance theaters are allowed in the MU-5, 6, 8, and 11 districts as well as the Downtown, and G-MU districts. Including these districts in the proposed changes would prohibit indoor live theater in areas where it is allowed and desired. A map indicating where indoor live theater would be prohibited is included in the attached memo. Planning also included a map showing the impact of adding mixed-use districts to the 1,000-foot buffer for the M-1, M-2, and/or DI district uses which are more intense and have a greater impact on residents. It is worth noting that existing legally established uses would be allowed to continue as nonconforming uses. Areas that would be impacted include: EI, M-1, and M-2 properties near the 900 North and 400 West intersection M-1 properties along the I-80 corridor M-1 properties along the I-215 corridor These areas are shown on the second map in the attached memo. The following information was provided for previous meetings. It is included again for background purposes. Item Schedule: Page | 2 The Council will be briefed about a Planning Commission initiated text amendment to review land uses that are or should be prohibited within 1,000 feet from residential zoning districts. It expands the prohibitions from single- and two-family residential districts to multi-family residential zones. It also clarifies how the distance is measured by applying the buffer to the entire lot rather than just the use boundaries within a lot. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation for approval to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RMF-30 RMF-35 RMF-45 RMF-75 FB-UN1 explosive manufacturing and storage, flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage, medical and hazardous waste incinerator, and petroleum products refinery. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Consideration 1 – Expanding the Residential Buffer Page | 3 As discussed above, the proposed text amendment changes the buffer area from specifically where the activity occurs to the entire lot. This will simplify determining where buffer applies and streamlines the review process. Consideration 2 – Reclassifying Highly Impactful and Detrimental Uses animal stockyard outdoor automobile salvage and recycling concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing heavy manufacturing poultry farm or processing plant outdoor recycling processing center rock, sand, and gravel storage and distribution, and slaughterhouse ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Not applicable The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on city resources necessary to carry out the provisions and processes required by this title. The proposal is intended to reduce polluting or contaminating uses which will lessen the burden on City resources. Page | 4 The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on other properties that would be subject to the proposal and properties adjacent to subject properties. Residential properties will have fewer impacts from intense uses. The community benefits that would result from the proposed text amendment, as identified in 21A.50.050.C. Not applicable. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • November 13, 2024 – Planning Commission initiated petition. • November 19, 2024 – Petition deemed complete. • November 21, 2024 – Petition assigned to Noah Elmore, Associate Planner. • November 2024-March 2025 – Planning staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. • January 23, 2025 – Notice of petition sent to all City recognized community organizations. • January 28, 2025 – Petition posted to the Planning Division’s online open house webpage. • February 10, 2025 – Planning staff presented the proposal at the Sugar House Community Council. • February 20, 2025 – Planning staff presented the proposal at the Liberty Wells Community Council. • March 6, 2025 – Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • March 12, 2025 – Planning Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • April 28, 2025 – Ordinance requested from the Attorney’s Office. • July 30, 2025 – Ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office. • August 14, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM To: City Council From: Noah Elmore, Principal Planner Date: September 18, 2025 Re: PLNPCM2024-01357, Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions At the September 2 City Council Work Session, Council requested a map illustrating how the proposed buffer may be different with the addition of the Mixed Use Districts (Chapter 21A.25) to the proposed 1,000-foot buffer. Of note in this case is the “live performance theater (indoor)” use. Indoor live performance theaters are permitted in MU-5, MU-6, MU-8, and MU-11 districts, so including MU districts in the prohibition buffer would effectively prohibit those uses in the same districts they are technically permitted. Additionally, indoor live performance theaters are permitted in the Downtown and G-MU districts, which are bordered by MU districts. Including the MU zones in the buffer would effectively prohibit indoor live performance theaters in outer downtown areas (such as the Gateway and the Granary District) where these types of activities are anticipated and desired in the City’s Downtown Plan. As the proposal would limit indoor live performance theaters to only areas within the downtown core, Staff does not recommend including MU zones in the 1,000-foot buffer for indoor live performance theater uses. See Figure 1 for reference. Subsequently, the Council may want to consider only adding MU districts to the 1,000-foot buffer for the uses in the M-1, M-2, and/or EI districts. These uses include: • Animal Pound • Animal stockyard • Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) • Bus line yard and repair facility • Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing • Electric generation facility • Grain elevator • Heavy manufacturing • Impound lot • Poultry farm or processing plant • Recycling processing center (outdoor) • Rock, sand, and gravel storage and distribution • Slaughterhouse • Solid waste transfer station • Truck freight terminal SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 The addition of the MU districts would affect three areas in particular: • EI, M-1, and M-2 properties centered around the intersection of 900 North and 400 West • M-1 properties along the I-80 corridor • M-1 properties along the I-215 corridor See Figure 2 for reference. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 Figure 1. Map illustrating the area which would permit indoor live performance theaters if they were prohibited within 1,000’ of all MU districts SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 Figure 2. Map illustrating the expanded buffer if MU districts were included and how the buffer would affect EI, M-1, and M-2 districts. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/07/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/14/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Elmore, Noah E-mail noah.elmore@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/14/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/14/2025 Subject: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Noah Elmore Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the petition for a zoning text amendment. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The petition also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. This amendment primarily revises the existing buffer prohibiting certain uses from operating within 1,000 feet of single- or two-family zoning districts to include all residential zoning districts as listed in Chapter 21A.24. Specifically, the buffer is expanded to include the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF-75, and FB-UN1 zoning districts. Additionally, the provision is being amended to clarify that the buffer applies to the entirety of a lot as opposed to the boundaries of the use. As part of the proposal, staff is recommending that some uses be prohibited within the boundaries of Salt Lake City due to the risks they bring to health and safety of residents. Those uses are: explosive manufacturing and storage, flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage, medical waste/hazardous waste incinerator, and petroleum products refinery. Other uses which carry the potential to be highly intense, but not necessarily widespread in their impact (for example, producing air pollutants or excessive noise) on neighboring residents, are also proposed to be revised from permitted to conditional. The conditional use process would allow staff to better assess and mitigate potential impacts of these uses. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on January 23, 2025, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on March 10, 2025. Public Open House: An online open house was held from January 23, 2025 to March 10, 2025. No public comment was received. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 12, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of March 12, 2025 b) PC Minutes of March 12, 2025 c) PC Staff Report of March 12, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE Project Title: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01357 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 30, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments to Title 21A Zoning: • Amends Table 21A.33.030 • Amends Table 21A.33.040 • Amends Table 21A.33.050 • Amends Table 21A.33.060 • Amends Table 21A.33.070 • Amends section 21A.62.040 to amend the definitions of “Heavy Manufacturing” and “Chemical Manufacturing and Storage” Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. Amending Table 21A.33.030 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 Theater, live performance (Indoor) P1415 P1415 P1415 P1415 14. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved. 15. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24). Amending Table 21A.33.040 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/30/25____________________ By: /s/Courtney Lords_______________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney M-1 M-2 Animal: Stockyard C12 P12C12 Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing C12, 13, 19 P12C12 Explosive manufacturing and storage C12, 19 Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage P12 Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste C12, 19 Heavy manufacturing P12C12, 19 Poultry farm or processing plant P12, 19C12, 19 Refinery, petroleum products C12, 19 Recycling: Processing center (outdoor) C12, 13, 14, 19 P12, 19C12, 19 Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution C12 PC12 Slaughterhouse P12C12 Vehicle: Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) C12, 13, 14, 19 P12, 19C12, 19 12. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24) a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Amending Table 21A.33.050 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Theater, live performance (Indoor) P921 P921 P921 P921 9. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved. 21. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24). Amending Table 21A.33.060 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District G-MU Theater, live performance (Indoor) P4 4. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved Amending Table 21A.33.070 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A Manufacturing, concrete or asphalt Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Theater, live performance (Indoor) C15 C15 Permitted And Conditional Use By District PL PL-2 I UI MH EI P15, 24 C15 C15 C15 C15 15. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24) a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Amending section 21A.62.040 by amending the definitions of “Heavy Manufacturing” and “Chemical Manufacturing and Storage” CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING AND/OR STORAGE: A facility engaged in making and storing chemical products from raw or partially finished materials. HEAVY MANUFACTURING: The assembly, fabrication, or processing of goods and materials using processes that ordinarily have greater than average impacts on the environment, or that ordinarily have significant impacts on the use and enjoyment of adjacent property in terms of noise, smoke, fumes, odors, glare, or health and safety hazards, or that otherwise do not constitute "light manufacturing". Heavy manufacturing generally includes processing and fabrication of large or bulky products, products made from extracted or raw materials, or products involving flammable or explosive materials and processes which require extensive floor areas or land areas for the fabrication and/or incidental storage of the products. The term "heavy manufacturing" shall include uses such as refineries and chemical manufacturing. The term "heavy manufacturing" shall not include any use which is otherwise listed specifically in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the category of zoning district or districts under this title. Effective Date: This ordinance, if passed, shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake City Recorder. [The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee.] Is there a penalty for violating this ordinance? If so, please state penalty or reference another ordinance that prescribes the penalty here. _________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________. If penalty for violation includes possibility of imprisonment, include the following statement: Per Section 78B-22-301 of the Utah Code, Salt Lake City shall provide for indigent defense services, as that term is defined in 78B-22-102 of the Utah Code. ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________. Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ CITY RECORDER 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2024-01357 November 13, 2024 Petition initiated by City Council. November 19, 2024 Petition was deemed complete. November 21, 2024 November 2024 – March 2025 Petition assigned to Noah Elmore, Associate Planner. Staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. January 23, 2025 Notice of petition sent to all city recognized community organizations. January 28, 2025 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. Public comment period ended March 12, 2025 February 10, 2025 Proposal was presented at the Sugar House Community Council meeting. February 20, 2025 Proposal was presented at the Liberty Wells Community Council meeting February 27, 2025 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 6, 2025 March 12, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage. Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. April 28, 2025 Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office July 30, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-01357. At the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The petition also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other related provisions in Title 21A may also be modified as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Noah Elmore at (801) 535-7971 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at noah.elmore@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-01357. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 1 November 1, 2024 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Nick.norris@slc.gov or 801-535-6173 Date: November 13, 2024 Re: Petition initiation requested by Planning Commission to modify the provision that prohibits some land uses from being within 1,000 feet of single and two family zoning districts. Petition Initiation REQUEST: The commission recently requested that a work session item be placed on an agenda to discuss broadening the applicability of a regulation that prohibits certain land uses within 1,000 feet of single- and two-family zoning districts. The request proposed expanding the 1,000-foot prohibition to any residential zoning district. The purpose of this request is to protect the health and safety of residents living in other zoning districts, not just those who live in a single- or two- family district. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the commission initiate a petition that would potentially expand the regulation that prohibits some land uses that are detrimental to the health and safety of residents from being located within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district to apply to other residential zoning districts where people live. The following motion may be considered by the commission: “I move that the commission initiate a text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot spacing requirement from residential zoning districts. The initiation may include reviewing other land uses that should have the provision applied, clarifying whether the distance applies to the property or the boundaries of a use, and other related provisions that may help protect the health and safety of city residents.” ATTACHMENTS: A. ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 2 November 1, 2024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Planning Commission recently asked the Planning Division to provide some background information on a potential text amendment related to the spacing requirements between some land uses and single- or two-family residential zoning districts. Specifically, the commission asked if that wording should be changed so the spacing requirement would apply more equitably to all residential zoning districts and not just the single- and two-family zoning districts. The commission also asked about clarifying how the measurement is applied so the spacing applied if any portion of the property is within 1,000 feet. The purpose of the footnote is to prohibit land uses that generate noise, odor, pollution and other impacts that negatively impact the health and/or safety of people who live near such uses. The allowed land uses in each zoning district are listed in tables found in 21A.33. The uses listed are shown as either permitted or conditional. If the table does not indicate that the use is permitted or conditional, then the use is considered prohibited. Some land uses in some zoning districts include footnotes that typically further restrict a specific land use under specific circumstances. One of the footnotes found in the land use tables reads “Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District.” A sample of the uses that this footnote applies are in the table below. Zoning Districts Permitted or Conditional M-2, P The table indicates that most of the land uses with this provision are in the M-1 Light Manufacturing Zoning District and the M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Zoning District. Some of the uses are also in the CG General Commercial Zoning District or the EI Extractive Industry Zoning District. If the commission initiates a petition, a more thorough review of the land use tables will identify all land uses that are subject, or should be subject, to the footnote provision. 3 November 1, 2024 All but two of the other land uses with the provision are in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. Attachment A includes maps that show portions of the M-1, M-2, and EI zoning districts that are within 1,000-feet of a residential zoning district. The maps show that the land impacted by the 1,000-foot buffer are all in the Capitol Hill, Northwest, and Westside Planning Communities. The maps show single- and two- family zoning districts in yellow and all other residential districts in orange. The A-Agriculture zones are included as well because they allow single family dwellings on large lots. The intent of separating out the zoning districts is to demonstrate how the provision currently applies (residential shown in yellow on the maps) and how it may apply if modified to apply to all residential districts. The “Theater, Live Performance” land use was recently reviewed by the Planning Commission because the City Council initiated a text change to expand where this use is allowed. That land use would not be considered as part of this initiation as a result. There are likely other land uses within the land use table that create pollution and other health or safety impacts where this provision may be appropriate. As part of the review, the land use tables will be analyzed in more detail to identify the uses that create health and safety impacts to determine if the uses should be subject to the proposal. The analysis will also review the land use tables that are part of the zoning consolidation project. It is possible that the footnote may be applied to other zoning districts, be modified as well, or additional footnotes added based on the analysis. APPROVAL PROCESS AND COMMISSION AUTHORITY The commission has the authority to initiate a zoning amendment. To do so, the action must be advertised on the agenda with at least 24 hours public notice, a commissioner must make a motion to initiate the amendment, and then a majority of the commissioners present must vote to initiate the petition. If an amendment is approved, the Planning Division will research the relevant changes, draft the proposed changes, check in with the commission to ensure the changes are consistent with what the commission intends, and then start the public engagement process. The desired output of the process is to update the code to protect health and safety by limiting how close some impactful land uses are to where people live and to do so as quickly as possible to limit the possibility of the identified uses being established. 4 November 1, 2024 ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 5 November 1, 2024 6 November 1, 2024 This page has intentionally been left blank Item B6 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Text Amendment – Utility Installation Exemptions PLNPCM2024-01352 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Text Amendment – Utility Installation Exemptions PLNPCM2024-01352 BRIEFING UPDATE During the September 2, 2025 briefing Council Members expressed some concerns about impact to historic districts citing a recent project that generated significant public input. That input resulted in a better product. Granting administrative authority to approve similar projects could result in less than desirable outcomes. Planning staff said public notice for projects would still be required under the proposal. If there was substantial public input on projects in a historic district, then they could be referred to the Historic Landmark Commission for review. Council Members straw polled and were supportive of adding language clarifying exempted government antennas need to be “critical infrastructure” that “provide utility or public safety services to the public.” They were also supportive of not allowing antennas in the eco-industrial buffer area. Council Members held meetings with the Administration to discuss their concerns. The Planning Division will provide additional information in response to questions raised during the meetings. At the time this paperwork was submitted, the new information was not yet ready. Once it is sent, the Council will discuss it at a future work session briefing. The following information was provided for previous meetings. It is included again for background purposes. Item Schedule: Page | 2 The Council will be briefed about a text amendment initiated by Mayor Mendenhall to clarify utility installation exemptions found in City code by defining which utilities are included. It also standardizes language across land use tables. The commissions each forwarded unanimous recommendations for approval to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Planning Division Discretion – the draft ordinance exempts antennas from the zoning code if they are for “public safety purposes.” Planning recommends changing the antenna description to government owned “critical infrastructure” and grants the Planning Director authority to determine if an antenna qualifies for the designation. Eco-Industrial Buffer Area – Currently, City code does not allow antennas in the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area in the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. The proposal adds language to the code to specify this restriction. Potential Straw Polls Are Council Members supportive of granting the Planning Director authority to determine if an antenna qualifies as critical infrastructure? Are Council Members supportive of adding language to City code specifying antennas are not allowed in the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area in the Northwest Quadrant Overlay? KEY CONSIDERATIONS Page | 4 Planning staff identified three key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 2-4 of the Planning Commission staff report, and briefly summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning staff report. Consideration 1 – Standardize the footnote in the land use tables referencing 21A.50.050.A Consideration 2 – Clarifying which utility-based land uses are exempt from City code. Consideration 3 – Streamlining planning processes for public utility development Page | 5 ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Attachment A (pages 10-11) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning text amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Not applicable The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on city resources necessary to carry out the provisions and processes required by this title. The proposal would reduce administrative burden on City staff. Fewer zoning reviews would save time and resources while maintaining essential public services. The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on other properties that would be subject to the proposal and properties adjacent to subject properties. Proposed changes would affect all properties equally. Some exemptions may impact aesthetics due to a lack of zoning regulations. Ensures public services can expand efficiently with flexibility. The community benefits that would result from the proposed text amendment, as identified in 21A.50.050. Not applicable. • November 12, 2024 – Mayor Mendenhall initiated petition. • November 18, 2024 – Petition deemed complete. • November 18, 2024 – Petition assigned to David Stuenzi, Associate Planner. • November 2024-March 2025 – Planning staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. • December 26, 2024 – Notice of petition sent to all City recognized community organizations. • December 31, 2024 – Petition posted to the Planning Division’s online open house webpage. Page | 6 • February 27, 2025 – Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • March 12, 2025 – Planning Commission meeting and public hearing. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. • March 20, 2025 – Historic Landmark Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. • April 3, 2025 – Historic Landmark Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • April 18, 2025 – Ordinance requested from the Attorney’s Office. • July 22, 2025 – Ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office. • August 7, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/01/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Stuenzi, David E-mail David.Stuenzi@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/06/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/07/2025 Subject: Text Amendment - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Recommendation to adopt ordinance version 1-B. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning text amendment to clarify exemptions in Section 21A.02.050.B and update footnotes in the land use tables (Section 21A.33) related to utility exemptions. The proposed amendment’s purpose is to update the language in both sections to ensure consistency and clarity regarding utility exemptions. In addition to clarifying the exemptions within city code, the amendment ensures that exemptions apply only to specific utility equipment rather than all utility uses. It more clearly defines which utilities are exempt and includes government-owned and operated antennas, as well as fences or walls necessary to restrict access to public utility land uses or structures. These updates align with the city’s longstanding practice of exempting essential equipment while confirming that larger utility uses, such as water treatment plants and power generation facilities, remain subject to zoning requirements. Additional changes have been incorporated into the proposed text amendment to streamline the development process for critical infrastructure. Utility structures often have unique designs that don’t align with standard zoning and design requirements, creating unnecessary barriers to their development. This amendment exempts utility buildings and structures from certain design standards, allows administrative approval for new utility buildings in historic districts, and permits zoning modifications through administrative review within planned developments. Projects reviewed administratively would still require public notification to nearby properties, but a public hearing would not be required. At its March 12th meeting, the Planning Commission expressed support for the proposed amendment but recommended that it be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission, as it includes granting the Planning Department administrative authority to review new public utility structures within the historic overlay. The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed the proposal at its April 3rd meeting and agreed that it would be appropriate for Planning Staff to process these types of applications administratively. Both commissions have recommended approval to City Council. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Both the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission held public hearings to review the proposed text amendment and unanimously forwarded a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council. Following these recommendations, staff identified the following for council consideration: • Planning Department Discretion – The draft ordinance exempted antennas from the zoning code if the antenna was for “public safety purposes.” This language has been changed to, critical infrastructure, and gives the planning director the authority to determine if an antenna qualifies as critical infrastructure. This change allows for some discretion and prevents the exemption from applying too broadly. • Eco-Industrial Buffer Area – Existing zoning does not allow antennas in the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. Language has been added to maintain the restriction. The above recommendations are reflected in the ordinance 1-B if the council decides they would like these changes incorporated. If the council does not want these changes incorporated, they are not included in ordinance 1-A. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on December 26th, 2024, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement was extended for a week due to the holidays and ended on February 16th, 2025. Public Open House: An online open house was held from December 31st, 2024, to February 16th, 2025. No public comment was received. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 12th, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting: The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing on April 3rd, 2025. The Historic Landmark Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed text amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access Report) Historic Planning Commission (HLC) Records a) HLC Agenda of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access) b) HLC Minutes of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Historic Landmark Commission Staff Report of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance – Version 1-B 2) Ordinance – Version 1-A 3) Project Chronology 4) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 5) Original Petition 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE Version 1-B V2 Project Title: Zoning Text Amendments - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352 Version: 1-B Date Prepared: July 23, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025; additional recommended language by Planning Staff is highlighted in yellow. This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Section 21A.02.050.B.2 to clarify exemptions for certain above-ground public utility structures. • Amends Section 21A.33.020, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, to provide clearer and more consistent language regarding exemptions in footnotes. • Amends Section 21A.33.030, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.040, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.050, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.060, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.00, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1, Administrative Authority, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee for public utility buildings and structures when requiring a certificate of appropriateness. • Amends Section 21A.37.020, to exclude public utility buildings and structures from design review standards found in 21A.37. • Amends Table 21A.40.090: Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, by revising the second footnote to include a reference to the antenna exemptions in section 21A.02.050. • Amends Section 21A.55.020, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee when a public utility or structure is applying for a planned development and exempt these uses from minimum area requirements. • Amends Section 21A.62.040, Definitions, to redefine “Utility, Building or Structure” to encompass a broader range. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends 21A.02.050. B.2 as follows: 1 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: 7/23/25______________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney V2 2. Utility Installations: Equipment or structures for the provision of essential services to the 3 public as listed below: 4 a. Public utility infrastructure such as wWires, cables, poles, conduits, vaults, laterals, pipes, 5 mains, valves or other similar equipment for the distribution to consumers of telephone or 6 other telecommunications, electricity, gas or water, or the collection of, water, sewer 7 sewage, or stormwater, or transportation. Such infrastructure shall be when owned, 8 operated and/or maintained by a governmental entity or a public utility. Such installations 9 and shall comply with Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation 10 Administration rules and regulations and those of other authorities having jurisdiction. 11 b. This exemption includes gGround mounted utility boxes installed by a governmental 12 entity in the public right-of-way for public safety and management purposes, such as 13 traffic control devices, utility boxes for lighting and parking meters. All other ground 14 mounted utility boxes shall not be exempt from the regulations of this title and are subject 15 to section 21A.40.160, "Ground Mounted Utility Boxes", of this title. 16 c. Government owned and operated antennas, including communication towers, when 17 deemed by the planning director as critical infrastructure necessary to provide specific 18 utility needs to the public, except that: 19 i) If located within the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay, the antenna shall 20 comply with the provisions in section 21A.34.040. 21 ii) Antennas are prohibited within the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest 22 Quadrant Overlay District. 23 d. Fences or walls only when necessary to restrict access and promote safety of public 24 utility land uses or structures. 25 e. All other utility land uses, buildings or structures, shall comply with the applicable 26 standards of this title. 27 28 2. Amends Section 21A.33.020 to make changes to the following existing footnote: 29 5. See subsection 21A.02.050.B for utility regulations. Certain utility installations may be exempt 30 from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 31 32 3. Amends Section 21A.33.030 to modify only the following rows in the table: 33 34 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE 35 DISTRICTS: 36 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses by District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 exceeding the maximum height in the 18. Certain utility installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 37 21A.02.050.B. 38 39 4. Amends Section 21A.33.040 to modify the following table: 40 41 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING 42 DISTRICTS: 43 Use V2 Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building 1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. Certain utility installations 44 may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 45 46 5. Amends Section 21A.33.050 to modify the following table: 47 48 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 49 DISTRICTS 50 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 C1 C1 C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 51 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 52 53 6. Amends Section 21A.33.060 to modify the following table: 54 55 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY 56 DISTRICTS 57 Use Conditional Use By Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 58 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 59 60 7. Amends Section 21A.33.070 to modify the following table. 61 62 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE 63 DISTRICTS 64 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1,21 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height Permitted And Conditional Use By District V2 PL PL-2 I UI MH EI P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1,11 C1 C1 C1 65 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 66 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 67 21. New antennase and telecommunication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in 68 the OS Open Space District for public safety, public security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities 69 Department purposes only., if not already exempted under section 21A.02.050 of this title. 70 71 8. Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1 as follows: 72 73 1. Administrative Authority: The following may be decided by the planning director or designee: 74 a. Minor alteration of or addition to a landmark site or contributing building or structure; 75 b. Alteration of or addition to a noncontributing building or structure; 76 c. Partial demolition of either a landmark site or a contributing principal building or structure; 77 d. Demolition of an accessory building or structure; and 78 e. Demolition of a noncontributing building or structure.; and 79 f. New construction of a public utility building or structure necessary for the provision of 80 essential services to the public. 81 82 9. Amends Subsection 21A.37.020.D and adds E as follows: 83 84 D. Utility: Public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to 85 the public shall be exempt from this chapter. 86 87 E. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, 88 structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a 89 landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in 90 Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. 91 92 10. Amends Section 21A.40.090 to modify the following table: 93 94 TABLE 21A.40.090: WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 95 Wall Mount3 Roof Mount3 Monopole With Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Less Than 2’ Wide3 Monopole With Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Greater Than 2’ Wide3 Lattice Tower Stealth District Height Limit But Not To Exceeding The Maximum Height Limit But Not To Exceeding The Maximum V2 60’ (Whichev er Is Less) The Zone Up To 30 Additional (Whichev er Is Less) Up To 30 Additional feet 2. New telecommunications towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS zone 96 for public safety, public security, or Salt Lake Public Utilities Department purposes only., if not already 97 exempted under section 21A.02.050 of this title. 98 99 11. Amends Section 21A.55.020.A as follows: 100 101 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny, 102 or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific zoning standards outlined in this 103 section. Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying provisions in 104 Subsection 21A.52.060.B. The approval shall be in accordance with the standards and procedures 105 set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 106 located. 107 1. Specific zoning standards outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet 108 the qualifying provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 109 2. Dimensional standards to accommodate a public utility building or structure necessary 110 for the provision of essential services to the public. Additional building height shall be 111 limited to 5 feet. 112 113 12. Adds Subsection 21A.55.060.C as follows: 114 115 C. Exemption: Minimum area requirements do not apply when the planned development is for 116 public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to the public. 117 118 13. Amends the following definition in Section 21A.62.040: 119 120 UTILITY, BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: A building or structure owned, operated or maintained 121 by a governmental entity or a public utility and needed to provide distribution, transmittal and or 122 maintenance for the provision of public utility services for water, sewer and flood control 123 including wells, pumping stations, reservoirs, water treatment plant, water storage tanks, detention 124 basins, lift stations, regulators and other similar facilities unless exempted in section 21A.02.050 125 of this title. Utility, building or structure does not include offices or other uses otherwise defined in 126 the code. 127 128 [end] 129 This page has intentionally been left blank 2. ORDINANCE Version 1-A V2 Project Title: Zoning Text Amendments - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352 Version: 1-A Date Prepared: July 23, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Section 21A.02.050.B.2 to clarify exemptions for certain above-ground public utility structures. • Amends Section 21A.33.020, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, to provide clearer and more consistent language regarding exemptions in footnotes. • Amends Section 21A.33.030, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.040, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.050, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.060, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.00, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1, Administrative Authority, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee for public utility buildings and structures when requiring a certificate of appropriateness. • Amends Section 21A.37.020, to exclude public utility buildings and structures from design review standards found in 21A.37. • Amends Section 21A.55.020, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee when a public utility or structure is applying for a planned development and exempt these uses from minimum area requirements. • Amends Section 21A.62.040, Definitions, to redefine “Utility, Building or Structure” to encompass a broader range. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends 21A.02.050. B.2 as follows: 1 2 2. Utility Installations: Equipment or structures for the provision of essential services to the 3 public as listed below: 4 a. Public utility infrastructure such as wWires, cables, poles, conduits, vaults, laterals, pipes, 5 mains, valves or other similar equipment for the distribution to consumers of telephone or 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __7/23/25___________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney V2 other telecommunications, electricity, gas or water, or the collection of, water, sewer 7 sewage, or stormwater, or transportation. Such infrastructure shall be when owned, 8 operated and/or maintained by a governmental entity or a public utility. Such installations 9 and shall comply with Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation 10 Administration rules and regulations and those of other authorities having jurisdiction. 11 b. This exemption includes gGround mounted utility boxes installed by a governmental 12 entity in the public right-of-way for public safety and management purposes, such as 13 traffic control devices, utility boxes for lighting and parking meters. All other ground 14 mounted utility boxes shall not be exempt from the regulations of this title and are subject 15 to section 21A.40.160, "Ground Mounted Utility Boxes", of this title. 16 c. Government owned and operated antennas, including communication towers, for public 17 safety purposes, except when located within the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay, 18 in which case, shall comply with the provisions in section 21A.34.040. 19 d. Fences or walls only when necessary to restrict access and promote safety of public 20 utility land uses or structures. 21 e. All other utility land uses, buildings or structures, shall comply with the applicable 22 standards of this title. 23 24 2. Amends Section 21A.33.020 to make changes to the following existing footnote: 25 5. See subsection 21A.02.050.B for utility regulations. Certain utility installations may be exempt 26 from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 27 28 3. Amends Section 21A.33.030 to add the following table: 29 30 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE 31 DISTRICTS: 32 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses by District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 exceeding the maximum height in the 18. Certain utility installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 33 21A.02.050.B. 34 35 4. Amends Section 21A.33.040 to modify the following table: 36 37 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING 38 DISTRICTS: 39 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building 1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. Certain utility installations 40 may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 41 V2 42 5. Amends Section 21A.33.050 to add the following table: 43 44 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 45 DISTRICTS 46 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 C1 C1 C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 47 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 48 49 6. Amends Section 21A.33.060 to add the following table: 50 51 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY 52 DISTRICTS 53 Use Conditional Use By Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 54 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 55 56 7. Amends Section 21A.33.070 to add the following footnotes: 57 58 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE 59 DISTRICTS 60 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1,21 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height Permitted And Conditional Use By District PL PL-2 I UI MH EI 61 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 62 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 63 64 8. Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1 as follows: 65 V2 66 1. Administrative Authority: The following may be decided by the planning director or designee: 67 a. Minor alteration of or addition to a landmark site or contributing building or structure; 68 b. Alteration of or addition to a noncontributing building or structure; 69 c. Partial demolition of either a landmark site or a contributing principal building or structure; 70 d. Demolition of an accessory building or structure; and 71 e. Demolition of a noncontributing building or structure.; and 72 f. New construction of a public utility building or structure necessary for the provision of 73 essential services to the public. 74 75 9. Amends Subsection 21A.37.020.D and adds E as follows: 76 77 D. Utility: Public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to 78 the public shall be exempt from this chapter. 79 80 E. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, 81 structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a 82 landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in 83 Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. 84 85 10. Amends Section 21A.55.020.A as follows: 86 87 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny, 88 or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific zoning standards outlined in this 89 section. Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying provisions in 90 Subsection 21A.52.060.B. The approval shall be in accordance with the standards and procedures 91 set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 92 located. 93 1. Specific zoning standards outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet 94 the qualifying provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 95 2. Dimensional standards to accommodate a public utility building or structure necessary 96 for the provision of essential services to the public. Additional building height shall be 97 limited to 5 feet. 98 99 11. Adds Subsection 21A.55.060.C as follows: 100 101 C. Exemption: Minimum area requirements do not apply when the planned development is for 102 public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to the public. 103 104 12. Amends the following definition in Section 21A.62.040: 105 106 UTILITY, BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: A building or structure owned, operated or maintained 107 by a governmental entity or a public utility and needed to provide distribution, transmittal and or 108 maintenance for the provision of public utility services for water, sewer and flood control 109 including wells, pumping stations, reservoirs, water treatment plant, water storage tanks, detention 110 basins, lift stations, regulators and other similar facilities unless exempted in section 21A.02.050 111 V2 of this title. Utility, building or structure does not include offices or other uses otherwise defined in 112 the code. 113 114 115 [end] 116 This page has intentionally been left blank 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2024-01352 November 12, 2024 Petition initiated by City Council. November 18, 2024 Petition was deemed complete. November 18, 2024 November 2024 – March 2025 Petition assigned to David Stuenzi, Associate Planner. Staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. December 26, 2024 Notice of petition sent to all city recognized community organizations. December 31, 2025 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. Public comment period ended February 16th, 2024 February 27, 2025 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 6, 2025 March 12, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage. Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. March 20, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 27, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage April 3, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. April 18th, 2025 Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. July 22nd, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-01352. At the March 12th, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to clarify the application of utility exemptions in 21A.02.050 and to standardize the footnotes in related land use tables. Related provisions in Title 21A may also be modified as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call David Stuenzi at (801) 535-6135 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at david.stuenzi@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-01352. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 5. ORIGINAL PETITION To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Tammy Hunsaker, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director. From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: November 12, 2024 Re: Initiation of a zoning text amendment to clarify zoning ordinance section 21A.02.050 Applicability and 21A.33 Land Use Tables. The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a zoning text amendment to clarify zoning code section 21A.02.050 Applicability and the associated land use tables related to utility uses, buildings, and structures. Currently, 21A.02.050 exempts utility installations that include wires, cables, conduits, vaults, pipes, mains, valves or other similar items and equipment that are necessary to distribute water, electricity, communication, sewer, and stormwater when owned, operated, and/or maintained by a government entity or public utility. The land use tables found in 21A.33 include a footnote that references section 21A.02.050, but the footnote is listed for all utility buildings and uses as well. This has created some discrepancy in whether all utility structures are also exempt despite not being listed in 21A.02.050. The intent of this amendment is to clarify that the longstanding practice of the city to exempt the necessary equipment (as listed in 21A.01.050 and updated as needed), including fencing needed to secure some equipment, from zoning regulations but that utility uses (such as water treatment plants, electricity generating plants, etc.) are not exempt and must comply with the applicable zoning regulations. This will not impact cell antennae or structures. The public process will include a minimum 45-day public input period before the Planning Commission holds a public hearing. All registered recognized organizations will be notified of the proposal. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at 801-535-6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. 11/12/2024 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Created: By: Status: 2024-11-12 Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) Clarifying utility related uses and structures that are exempt from zoning regulations (002) Final Audit Report 2024-11-13 "Clarifying utility related uses and structures that are exempt fro m zoning regulations (002)" History Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) 2024-11-12 - 8:54:32 PM GMT Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) for signature 2024-11-12 - 8:54:58 PM GMT Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) 2024-11-13 - 1:29:03 AM GMT Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2024-11-13 - 1:32:23 AM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed. 2024-11-13 - 1:32:23 AM GMT This page has intentionally been left blank 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. This page has intentionally been left blank Item B7 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Patriot Rail Street Vacations – Approximately 6500 West I-80 Eastbound Freeway (PLNPCM2025-00432) MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Patriot Rail Street Vacations – Approximately 6500 West I-80 Eastbound Freeway (PLNPCM2025-00432) BRIEFING UPDATE During the October 7, 2025 briefing Council Members were generally supportive of the proposal. They discussed the desire to move the rail yard farther west. The applicant said it is their intent to move the rail yard and confirmed the subject property would be purchased at market value if the proposal is approved by the Council. The following information was provided for previous meetings. It is included again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate (or relinquish ownership of) portions of the public right-of-way crossing the applicant’s property adjacent to the south side of Interstate-80 and southwest of the International Center as shown in the image below. The subject parcels are remnants of public rights-of- way that were platted but never developed. It is the applicant’s intent to incorporate the parcels into their property. If approved by the Council, the applicant would be required to obtain an appraisal for the parcels and purchase them from the City at market value. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its July 23, 2025 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted 7:1 (abstention) to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested right-of-way Item Schedule: Page | 2 vacation with the conditions listed below. The Commissioner who abstained stated they did not feel confident enough to vote either in support of or opposition to the proposal. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed partial street closure, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. Vicinity map with the subject parcels outlined in red. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page | 3 A. Lack of Use B. Public Safety C. Urban Design D. Community Purpose As discussed in Attachment D (pages 16-17) of the Planning Commission staff report, Planning staff found the lack of use consideration is applicable, noting that the parcels cannot be developed as they are blocked by the freeway and rail lines. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified four key considerations during analysis of this proposal which are found on pages 4-5 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals & Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning reviewed the proposed street vacation and how it aligns with the following City plans: Northwest Quadrant Master Plan (2016) Major Street Plan (2018) Planning staff noted that the Northwest Quadrant Master Plan supports short line rail expansion through the area. They found that if the subject parcels could be used as public streets, those would conflict with rail lines already in the area. The Major Street Plan calls for the property to be used as a railroad corridor and does not include future streets to be developed there. Additionally, the Mountain View Corridor is anticipated to connect to Interstate-80 through the eastern portion of this property at some point in the future, but that section of the corridor has not been designed yet. That road will need to meet all government requirements related to railroad crossings. Consideration 2 – Utah State Code Section 10-9a-609.5 of Utah State Code grants power to cities to vacate streets upon the request of the governing body or a property owner: 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (3) If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a-208 and determine whether: (a) good cause exists for the vacation; and (b) the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. Planning staff reviewed aerial and street-level images of the subject property and noted no streets were previously developed at the subject site. It is their opinion that the public would not be negatively impacted by vacating the street segments, and that a public benefit would be the City being paid market rate for the land. Consideration 3 – Salt Lake City Ordinance As discussed above, street vacations are processed like alley vacations following the standards found in Salt Lake City Code Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City Owned Alleys. Planning’s analysis of these standards found in Attachment D (pages 16-17 of the Planning Commission staff report) found that the lack of use consideration is applicable. Consideration 4 – Department Review Comments The City Engineering Division was not supportive of the partial street vacation as their policy is typically to Page | 4 not support vacating rights-of-way, as potential future utility access needs are unknown. Because of some confusion with the adjacent property’s address, Engineering recommended an updated address for the property if the street vacation is approved by the Council. As discussed above, Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the parcels be consolidated with adjacent property owned by the applicant. The address issue could be resolved as part of that process. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY May 23, 2025 – Application for street vacation was received by Planning Division. May 29, 2025 – Petition assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner. June 4, 2025 – o Notice was sent to the Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows Community Councils informing them of the petition. The 45-day input and comment period began. o Early notification was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the applicant’s property. July 18, 2025 – The 45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended. No comments from the community councils or public have been received by the Planning Division or City Council Office as of the date of this report. June 23, 2025 – The Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the street vacation requests subject to the recommended conditions of approval. August 19, 2025 – Planning staff requested ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. September 8, 2025 – Ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office. September 12, 2025 – Transmitted to City Council Office. STREET CLOSURE PROCESS The street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference. 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. Page | 5 (3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a- 208 and determine whether: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. (4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. (5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land is located: (a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or (b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and (ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated. (6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that has been dedicated to public use: (a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public street or municipal utility easement; and (b)may not be construed to impair: (i)any right-of-way or easement of any parcel or lot owner; (ii)the rights of any public utility; or (iii)the rights of a culinary water authority or sanitary sewer authority. (7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a process to vacate some or all of a public street. (b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a): (i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing; (ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent: (A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27; (B)the easement is included within the public street; and (C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and (iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street through a recorded plat or amended plat. (8)A legislative body may not approve a petition to vacate a public street under this section unless the vacation identifies and preserves any easements owned by a culinary water authority and sanitary sewer authority for existing facilities located within the public street. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/08/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/12/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Hulka, Andy E-mail Andy.Hulka@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/11/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/12/2025 Subject: Patriot Rail Street Vacations - Approximately 6500 W I-80 EB Fwy Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Approve the request to vacate the portions of right-of-way that cross the property at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway, with the following conditions:1. The property owner shall reserve an easement on the subject property in favor of Salt Lake City for the use, access, and maintenance of utilities and related facilities, as approved by SLCDPU.2. The vacated portions of right-of-way shall be consolidated through a parcel consolidation application. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Please see above This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway, the property owners at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway, have requested that Salt Lake City vacate several remnant portions of right-of-way that cross the property. When a portion of right-of-way is vacated, it is no longer public property. In this case, the petitioner is requesting to purchase these portions of right-of-way to include in their property boundary for future railroad-related uses. These are areas that were platted and dedicated to the city for use as public streets but were never constructed. (Aerial view of subject property) The applicant is requesting that the city vacate five portions of street right-of-way to facilitate the future use of the property for railroad-related uses. There are no existing structures on the property. The subject property does not have frontage on a public street and cannot be accessed by the public. There is freight rail service to the property provided by the adjacent Salt Lake Garfield & Western rail lines. Otherwise, the right-of-way areas can only be accessed by driving through the private properties to the west owned by the railroad. If the request is approved by Council, the property owner would be required to pay fair market value for the land. The Real Estate Services Division requires that the applicant get an appraisal for the area in question before the sale. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on July 23rd, 2025, and voted 7-1 to forward a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the request, with the following conditions of approval: 1. The property owner shall reserve an easement on the subject property in favor of Salt Lake City for the use, access, and maintenance of utilities and related facilities, as approved by SLCDPU. 2. The vacated portions of right-of-way shall be consolidated with an adjacent property through a parcel consolidation application. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification – On June 4, 2025, the Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows Community Councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Neither council provided any comments about the request. A notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. An online open house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from June to July. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on July 23rd, 2025. The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to forward a recommendation of approval for the request, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. The full public meeting can be viewed using this link starting at 2:26:04. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of July 23, 2025 b) PC Minutes of July 23, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of July 23, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List 5. Ordinance This page has intentionally been left blank EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00432 - Street Vacations at Approximately 6500 W I-80 EB Fwy May 23, 2025 Petition for the Street Vacation was accepted by Salt Lake City Planning Division. May 29, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-00432 was assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. June 4, 2025 Early notification was sent to the Poplar Grove and Jordan Meadows Community Council Chairs, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. June 4, 2025 An early notification letter was sent to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the portions of the right-of-way requested to be vacated. July 18, 2025 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. July 23, 2025 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to approve the request to vacate the portions of right-of-way that cross the property at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00432, a petition submitted by the property owners to vacate the portions of street right-of-way that cross the property at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway. When a portion of a street is vacated, it is no longer public property. In this case, the petitioner is requesting to purchase these portions of street right-of-way and include them in their property boundary. These are areas that were platted and dedicated to the City for use as public streets but were never constructed. The subject property is located within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: PLACE: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Andy Hulka at 801-535-6608 or via e-mail at andy.hulka@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00432. The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION ALLEY / STREET VACATION PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 5 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. REQUIRED FEES • Alley Vacation: $316 filing fee †. • Street Vacation: $473 filing fee. • Additional required notice fees will be assessed after submission. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. I M P O R T A N T I N F O R M A T I O N ALLEY / STREET VACATION DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. FOOTNOTES: † ALLEY VACATION FEE WAIVER AVAILABLE IF ADEQUATE SIGNATURES ARE OBTAINED. Owner Contractor* Other*Architect* REQUEST CASE NUMBER MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner’s consent required) A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N O F F I C E U S E LOCATION OF ALLEY / STREET PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) EMAIL PHONE PHONE EMAIL IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST Parcel 07-34-477-001 (abutting Parcel 07-34-502-004) Application to vacate California Street, Nevada Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street located on Parcel 07-34-477-001 Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway (904) 265-0624 5215 Wiley Post Way, Suite 150 Renee.Maxey@patriotrail.com RM Anaya Gayle Of Counsel Phone 801.799.5983 AGayle@hollandhart.com Location Contact April 25, 2025 Planning Division 451 South State Street Room 506 PO Box 145480 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480 Re: Street Vacation Application – Salt Lake County Parcel Number 07-34-477- 001 and Salt Lake County Parcel Number 07-34-502-004 Dear Salt Lake City Planning Division: Pursuant to Section 10-9a-609.5 of Utah Code Annotated and Chapter 14.52 of Salt Lake City Code (the “City Code”), we submit this letter on behalf of Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway (“SLGW”) in support of its application to vacate isolated remnant portions of California Street, Nevada Street, Main Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street situated between U.S. Interstate 80 (“I-80”) to the north and Salt Lake County Parcel Number 07-34-502-004 (the “Rail Property”), to the south (together, the “Streets”). The Streets bifurcate the property having Salt Lake County Parcel Number 07-35-351-001 (the “Property”) into several parts, making the Property difficult, if not impossible, to develop. SLGW owns the Property and the Rail Property. Both are located within the Inland Port Overlay District and the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay. In accordance with City Code Section 15.52.020, the proposed vacation satisfies not one but two policy considerations; and, pending approval by all city departments, meets all other factors considered when vacating streets in accordance with City Code Section 14.52.030. I.Policy Considerations A.Lack of Use 1. The Streets Do Not Exist The Streets were officially dedicated “for the perpetual use of the public” in that certain Maplewood Addition to Salt Lake City plat dated January 30, 1911 and recorded in the official records of the Salt Lake County Recorder on February 9, 1911 as Entry No. 276527 in Plat Book F at Page 070; however, the Streets were never improved and do not physically exist. 2. Materially Blocked and Unusable April 25, 2025 Page 2 The Streets are materially blocked to the north by I-80 and to the south by the Rail Property in a way that renders them unusable as public streets. Additionally, there is a fence that separates commercial buildings to the south of the Rail Property from the Rail Property, and there is no feasible access from the commercial property to the Streets. Further, the commercial buildings are served by private roads. Consequently, the Streets are materially blocked from end-to-end and cannot be used as public streets. Because the Streets have never been developed and could not be developed at this point and because they are materially blocked, our sense is that the proposed vacation satisfies the “Lack of Use” policy articulated in City Code Section 15.52.020.A. B.Streets Do Not Serve as a Positive Urban Design Element The Streets do not serve as a positive urban design element and do not enhance the Property’s functionality. The Streets fragment the Property, making development on the Property difficult, if not impossible. Accordingly, the proposed vacation satisfies the “Urban Design” policy articulated in City Code Section 15.52.020.C. II.Factors Pending approval by all city departments, vacating the Streets meets all other factors considered when vacating streets in accordance with City Code Section 14.52.030. 1.As detailed above, the vacation meets two of the policy considerations articulated in 14.52.020. a.The Streets have not been improved and do not physically exist; further, the Streets have been materially blocked rendering them unusable as public streets; and b. The continuation of the Streets does not serve as a positive urban design element. 2.The vacation of the Streets will not: a.Deny access or parking to any adjacent property; b. Result in any property being landlocked; or c.Result in a use which is contrary to the policies and goals of the city. 3.SLGW (the only abutting property owner) does not plan to build a garage accessed by the Streets. 4.The petition is for the entirety of the Streets. 5.The Streets are not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. April 25, 2025 Page 3 For these reasons, we respectfully ask that, pending approval by all city departments, SLGW’s application to vacate the Streets be approved. Kind regards, Anaya Gayle Of Counsel for Holland & Hart LLP 4. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER LLC 4700 W DAYBREAK PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 SALT LAKE GARFIELD & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY 10752 DEERWOOD PARK BLVD JACKSONVILLE FL 32256 RIVERBEND HOLDINGS UTAH, LLC PO BOX 50277 IDAHO FALLS ID 83405 COPPER CROSSING LAND COMPANY, LLC PO BOX 50277 IDAHO FALLS ID 83402 COPPER CROSSING BLDG #7, LLC 4609 W 65TH SOUTH IDAHO FALLS ID 83402 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 5. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2025 (Vacating portions of public right-of-way at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway) An ordinance vacating portions of the public right-of-way at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00432. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on July 23, 2025, to consider a request made by Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00432) to vacate portions of California Street, Nevada Street, Main Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street between I-80 and the railroad in order to facilitate future railroad-related uses on the property located at 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway; and WHEREAS, at its July 23, 2025, hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portions of right-of-way that cross the property at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway to the Salt Lake City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That portions of California Street, Nevada Street, Main Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street between I-80 and the railroad, which are more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, are hereby vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Conditions. This proposed vacation of city rights-of-way is conditioned upon the following: 1. The property owner shall reserve an easement on the subject property in favor of Salt Lake City for the use, access, and maintenance of utilities and related facilities, as approved by SLCDPU. 2. The vacated portions of right-of-way shall be consolidated with an adjacent property through a parcel consolidation application. SECTION 4. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 3 are not satisfied within one year of City Council passing of this Ordinance, then this Ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council may, for good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions prior to expiration of this Ordinance for good cause shown. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this Ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 20__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 20__. Published: ______________. Ordinance vacating 6500 W adjacent to I-80 Westbound APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___9/8/25__________________________ By: __/s/ Courtney Lords_________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the portions of property to be vacated at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway: Colorado Street A parcel of land located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point North 89°57'48" East 69.10 feet along the south line of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'37" East 66.00 feet from the Southwest Corner of said Section 35, and thence North 00°03'37" East 372.15 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'37" West 368.03 feet to a point 66.00 feet perpendicularly distant of said south line of Section 35; thence parallel to said line South 89°57'48" West 66.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 24,425 square feet or 0.56 acres, more or less. Montana Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 180.80 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'22" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°03'22" East 391.80 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'22" West 387.70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 25,723 square feet or 0.59 acres, more or less. Main Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 496.69 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'07" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°03'07" East 411.43 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'07" West 407.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 27,018 square feet or 0.62 acres, more or less. Nevada Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 812.58 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°02'52" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°02'52" East 424.16 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 88°07'56" East 66.03 feet; thence South 00°02'52" West 421.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 27,922 square feet or 0.64 acres, more or less. California Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 1,128.48 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°02'37" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°02'37" East 434.58 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 88°07'56" East 66.03 feet; thence South 00°02'37" West 432.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 28,610 square feet or 0.65 acres, more or less. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2025 (Vacating portions of public right-of-way at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway) An ordinance vacating portions of the public right-of-way at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00432. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on July 23, 2025, to consider a request made by Salt Lake Garfield & Western Railway (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00432) to vacate portions of California Street, Nevada Street, Main Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street between I-80 and the railroad in order to facilitate future railroad-related uses on the property located at 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway; and WHEREAS, at its July 23, 2025, hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portions of right-of-way that cross the property at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway to the Salt Lake City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That portions of California Street, Nevada Street, Main Street, Montana Street, and Colorado Street between I-80 and the railroad, which are more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, are hereby vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Conditions. This proposed vacation of city rights-of-way is conditioned upon the following: 1. The property owner shall reserve an easement on the subject property in favor of Salt Lake City for the use, access, and maintenance of utilities and related facilities, as approved by SLCDPU. 2. The vacated portions of right-of-way shall be consolidated with an adjacent property through a parcel consolidation application. SECTION 4. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 3 are not satisfied within one year of City Council passing of this Ordinance, then this Ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council may, for good cause shown, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions prior to expiration of this Ordinance for good cause shown. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this Ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 20__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 20__. Published: ______________. Ordinance vacating 6500 W adjacent to I-80 Westbound APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___9/8/25__________________________ By: __/s/ Courtney Lords_________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the portions of property to be vacated at approximately 6500 W I-80 Eastbound Freeway: Colorado Street A parcel of land located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point North 89°57'48" East 69.10 feet along the south line of Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'37" East 66.00 feet from the Southwest Corner of said Section 35, and thence North 00°03'37" East 372.15 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'37" West 368.03 feet to a point 66.00 feet perpendicularly distant of said south line of Section 35; thence parallel to said line South 89°57'48" West 66.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 24,425 square feet or 0.56 acres, more or less. Montana Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 180.80 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'22" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°03'22" East 391.80 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'22" West 387.70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 25,723 square feet or 0.59 acres, more or less. Main Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 496.69 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°03'07" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°03'07" East 411.43 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 86°27'55" East 66.12 feet; thence South 00°03'07" West 407.33 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 27,018 square feet or 0.62 acres, more or less. Nevada Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 812.58 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°02'52" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°02'52" East 424.16 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 88°07'56" East 66.03 feet; thence South 00°02'52" West 421.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 27,922 square feet or 0.64 acres, more or less. California Street A parcel of land located in the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, Salt Lake County, Utah, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point South 89°58'44" West 1,128.48 feet along the south line of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 2 West, Salt Lake Base and Meridian and North 00°02'37" East 66.00 feet from the Southeast Corner of said Section 34, and thence parallel to said line South 89°58'44" West 66.00 feet; thence North 00°02'37" East 434.58 feet to the south line of Interstate 80; thence along said line South 88°07'56" East 66.03 feet; thence South 00°02'37" West 432.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 28,610 square feet or 0.65 acres, more or less. This page has intentionally been left blank Item B8 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 PUBLIC HEARING MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Michael Sanders, Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: FISCAL YEAR 2026 BUDGET AMENDEMNT No.2 MOTION 1 – Close the public hearing and adopt all items. I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt Budget Amendment #2 as proposed by the Administration MOTION 2 – Close the public hearing and consider action on items A-2, A-6, and A-11 and defer action on remaining items I move that the Council close the public hearing and 1. Adopt items A-2 National League of Cities Summit Costs (at the higher $330,000 amount) as well as A-6 Modification of Appointed Position in Police Department and A-11 Assistance for Airport Federal Partners Due to Government Shutdown as proposed by the Administration. 2.Defer action on the remaining items to a future Council Meeting. MOTION 3 – Close the public hearing and defer action on all items to a future meeting I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action on all items in Budget Amendment #2 to a future Council meeting. MOTION 4 - POTENTIAL LEGISLATIVE INTENT I move that the Council adopt a legislative intent as follows “It is the Council’s intent to request the Administration to develop a formal policy which clearly defines when and how private donations should be accepted for CIP projects. It is the Council's desire that said policy include evaluation criteria and approval procedures. Ongoing maintenance of the asset(s) purchased or constructed with said donation should be considered in relation to its benefit(s).” COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Austin Kimmel, Kira Luke, Allison Rowland, Sylvia Richards, Michael Sanders, and Kate Werrett DATE:October 7, 2025 RE: Follow Up: FY 2026 Budget Amendment #2 NEW INFORMATION The Council received a briefing on this proposal during the October 07, 2025 Work Session. Council Staff gave an overview on items A-1 – A-11. During the briefing, the Council took straw polls on the following: A-2 National League of Cities Summit Costs A-6 Modification of an Appointed Position in the Police Department A-11 Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Results from all straw polls indicated favorable support. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Budget Amendment #2 includes 34 proposed amendments, including $71,326,282 in revenues and $137,008,677 in expenditures, including $913,000 from the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in 15 funds and adds 4.0 FTE’s. One is related to a proposed reclassification in Police and three pertain to the Utah Office of Victims of Crime grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. With the adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will be 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. If the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $1,498,933 below the 13% minimum target. As indicated by the Administration, a revenue update and projection will be provided with Budget Amendment #3. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. Updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages can be found on the table on page 2 of this report. STRAW POLL REQUESTS The Administration has requested straw polls for the following items: 1.A-2 National League of Cities Summit Costs 2.A-6 Modification of an Appointed Position in the Police Department CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: October 7, 2025 Set Date: October 7, 2025 Public Hearing: Oct. 21, 2025 Potential Action: Nov. 18, 2025 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Page | 3 Updated Fund Balance Chart The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. Page | 4 ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant. (General Fund One-time $350,000) This one-time allocation from Fund Balance would sustain current service levels and programming for three middle school programs—in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park—after the loss of the Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant, from the State Department of Workforce Services (DWS), for students in grades 7 and 8. The Division has received the grant for the past nine years (three funding cycles) but did not this year because statewide allocations from the Federal government dropped and DWS shifted its priority to rural areas. The $350,000 amount also would ensure that the School-Age Quality (SAQ) grant, which funds Youth & Family programs for elementary school children, will remain in compliance with Child Care Licensing standards. The loss of the TAP grant represents $1,008,000 of City’s program funding across the typical three-year cycle. In response, the Division has reviewed its allocations and streamlined programs and processes. The Division’s strategic plan, which will reflect these funding challenges, will be ready this fall. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs (General Fund One-time $300,000) The Administration is requesting an additional $300,000 from Fund Balance to cover costs associated with hosting the National League of Cities (NLC) annual Cities Summit this November. Those costs include services related to conference contractual obligations, transportation, venue rental, catering, entertainment, printing, and more. The requested funding is in addition to the $250,000 allocated by the Council as part of Budget Amendment No. 5 in FY25 and the $250,000 approved in the City's FY26 budget. The Administration continues to fundraise to offset conference costs to the City with a goal of raising $250,000. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs (General Fund One-time $45,000) The Administration is requesting $45,000 from Fund Balance to fund transition expenses for elected officials. City Code 2.03.030 requires that, during an election year, the City consider appropriating funds through the annual budget process or a budget amendment to support the transition of a newly elected mayor or council members. For the 2025 municipal election, up to three councilors may require transition funding. The estimated cost for salaries and benefits over eight pay periods is $14,440 per Council Member, totaling $43,320. An additional $1,680 is requested for device purchase(s). Any further device costs would be coordinated through the IMS Interservice Fund. These costs are consistent with current City Council compensation. This item could be held and the amount adjusted based on the outcome of the election to minimize the impact on Fund Balance. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South (CIP Fund – One-time $722,250 and Impact Fees – One-time $232,470) As part of the FY2026 CIP review, Council issued the following CIP Legislative Intent: “I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians ( CIP Project # 25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” In response to the Legislative Intent, the Administration is requesting $954,720 from the following funding appropriations: -Park Impact Fees: $232,470 -Rescope of FY2024 CIP Complete Streets Funding: $351,000 -FY2025 CIP Irrigation System Replacement Funding: $371,250. NOTE: the 300 South to 400 South blocks were included in the approved FY2025 CIP application, and this reappropriation extends the irrigation replacement to 500 South. This funding will fully fund the $954,720 request included in CIP Project #25. The separate CIP application requesting public art for this area is not included in this proposed funding. If approved, construction will occur in 2026 or 2027. Page | 5 A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police (General Fund – Ongoing $0) The Administration is requesting a modification to an appointed position in the Police Department. Specifically, the proposal updates the title of the Communications Administrative Director to Civilian Chief of Staff. Additionally, the job description will be updated. The Civilian Chief of Staff is described as an appointed, at-will position that supports the Chief of Police in advancing department goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. The role provides non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance departmental performance. For a full job description, please see Attachment 2. This proposal makes changes only to the title in the Compensation Plan and the job description. The position will remain classified at Grade A3, with a salary range of $110,000 to $250,000. No one-time or ongoing funds are being requested. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs (General Fund – ongoing $0) The Administration is proposing to reclassify the Internal Affairs Director into two new FTE’s. The new positions are as follows: (1)Communications Coordinator – Social Media Content a. This position will play a key role in enhancing the visibility, transparency, and community engagement efforts of the Department. This position will be responsible for creating, managing, and distributing engaging multimedia content across various social media platforms. The ideal candidate would be a skilled storyteller who can highlight the department’s mission, daily activities, community outreach, and public safety initiatives through compelling video, photography, and written content. (2)Communications Coordinator – Communications Specialist a. This position will support the Department's internal and external communication efforts by developing content, creating materials, and assisting the Public Information Officer (PIO) staff. They will play a key role in ensuring timely, accurate, and consistent communication to department staff, city leadership, the media, and the public. Both positions are proposed to be classified at Grade E25, with a salary range of $58,013 - $100,232. No one- time or ongoing funds are being requested. These positions will be funded through the payroll savings from the elimination of the Internal Affairs Director, which was classified at Grade A3, with a salary range of $110,000 to $250,000. The positions will report to the proposed Civilian Chief of Staff. The duties of the internal affairs director will be assumed by the Internal Affairs Lieutenant who will report to a Deputy Chief. For a full description of the current Internal Affairs Director’s duties, please see Attachment 3. The Administration reports that this change will streamline the Internal Affairs process and be in alignment with an updated Personnel Complaints policy. The department is also currently evaluating the possible need for an audit/policy adherence position similar to an inspector general. The Administration is requesting a straw poll which, if in the affirmative, would allow for early advertisement of the requested positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP (CIP Fund – One-time $180,000) In accordance with the relevant donation and funding agreements, the Inland Port has provided $180,000 to the City to support the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This marks the second contribution from Inland Port funds toward this initiative. Subject to future actions under the applicable agreements, additional funding may be available in subsequent years. If received, future funds will be used to support the system’s expansion and ongoing operational costs, such as software licenses, maintenance, and repairs. Page | 5 Page | 6 A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP (CIP Fund – One-time $70,000) To help address ongoing street racing issues in front of their facility, Airgas has provided $70,000 to the City for street modifications. These funds must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. The total cost for installing two speed tables is $115,365. The remaining balance will be covered using either Livable Streets Quick Action funds or Vision Zero funds. The Administration has previously partnered with other businesses to install similar speed tables on Ninigret Drive, which have proven effective in deterring street racing. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment (Government Immunity Fund - Ongoing $94,791) The Administration is requesting $94,791 to fund increased insurance premium costs for the Take-Home Vehicle Program. When the FY25 budget was adopted, $200,000 was appropriated based on a December 2024 estimate. However, due to losses incurred between the estimate and the July 1 renewal, the actual premium increased to $294,791. The proposed allocation will fund the difference. Additionally, this will represent an ongoing cost to the Government Immunity Fund. There may be continued increases to the premium, however, without actual data, it’s difficult to confirm whether there will be a continued increase, but it is dependent on the necessary use of the policy. In Fiscal Year 2027 the policy will be re-evaluated. Safety programs are being implemented throughout the City to mitigate the risk of accidents relating to take home city vehicles. A-10: CBIA-25 Budget (Misc. Special Revenue Fund - Ongoing $2,500,000) In April 2025, the Council adopted an ordinance re-establishing the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional three-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budgeting process. The Administration requests $2.5 million to support the special assessment in its first year. The total amount recognizes both the estimated revenue and expenses based on what the City has raised since the establishment of CBIA-25. Most of these funds will be paid to the contractor responsible for economic promotion. Additionally, $151,200 will be allocated for the City’s administrative fee. $185,630 will be held in a reserve account. A-11: Assistance for Airport Federal Partners Due to Government Shutdown (Airport Fund One- time $100,000) Due to the federal government shutdown that began on October 1st, the Administration is requesting authorization to use $100,000 in existing Airport funds to purchase food, household supplies, and gas cards to support Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel at the airport. These employees are expected to continue working without pay during the shutdown. The Council may recall a similar request made in 2019, when assistance was also provided to support our TSA partners. With the recent expansion of the airport and an increase in passenger traffic at security checkpoints, the need for support is even greater. Based on guidance from legal counsel, the Administration is seeking City Council approval and endorsement of using existing funds in this way; no new funds are being requested. Page | 7 Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources None Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources None Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward (General Fund One-time $168,000) The Department of Economic Development (DED) requests that the remaining Construction Mitigation Fund balance of $168,000 be carried from FY25 Budget Amendment #5 to FY26. The Council allocated $270,000 as part of Budget Amendment #5 in FY25, and DED deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the end of FY25. The remaining $168,000 is anticipated to support 56 additional grants of $3000 to qualifying businesses impacted by specific construction sites. The Construction Mitigation Grant Program aims to help retain businesses during critical and necessary infrastructure upgrades. As part of FY26, the Council approved $350,000 for the program. This $168,000 amount would be in addition to the previous allocation. D-2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget (IMS Fund One-time $159,414) IMS is requesting to use $159,414 to bring 22 positions within cybersecurity, system engineering, project management, data privacy, and directors of technology services up to the market rate for FY26, as recommended in the 2025 Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) report. The allocation is proposed to come from IMS's fund balance. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward (IMS Fund One-time $2,241,88) IMS has requested to carry forward $2,241,881 from their FY25 budget to cover expenses and contracts that were funded but not fully paid in FY25. These include office equipment and software expenses where the transaction timing did not align with the City's fiscal year. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office (Ongoing $50,000) The ongoing expense has been moved from the Mayor's Office to IMS to reflect IMS's management of contracts with language access service providers and translation assistance. The Mayor's Office decrease was reflected in the FY26 budget, but the corresponding increase was omitted. This amendment corrects that omission. No decrease or disruption in translation service access is anticipated. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward. (Golf Fund – One-time $957,404) This is a budget carry-forward to pay outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY25 and will be paid in FY26. Rather than representing a single project amount, the total reflects equipment purchases totaling $437,666 (mostly related to care for the greens and surrounding areas) plus $519,476 in facility improvements and repairs. The four largest individual expenses are: Bonneville Range Fence $158,435 Forest Dale Roof $131,430 Mountain Dell Stairs $123,971 Forest Dale Simulators $105,900 TOTAL $519,476 Page | 8 D-6: Green Bike Expansion (CIP Fund – One-time $608,290) UDOT has awarded the City $608,290 in federal funding to support the expansion of the Green Bike Program. The City is required to provide a local match of $44,172. This funding will support the addition of approximately nine new Green Bike stations, which will include bicycles. The UDOT funds are currently held in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund and must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP Fund One-time $6,355,027) This item accounts for interest revenue on proceeds that accumulated from July 2024-July 2025. The revenue was generated by unspent proceeds from multiple bond issuances, including three issuances of the Streets Reconstruction General Obligation Bonds (2020-2022), the October 2022 issuance of the Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, and the October 2023 Parks General Obligation Bonds. This amendment adjusts the CIP budget to reflect the actual amounts available. Interest revenue from bonds is allocated to the same projects the bonds were originally approved for. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward (Fleet Fund One-time $13,202,498) This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles and equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. Council Members may recall that during Budget Amendment No. 5, the Council authorized $5 million in Funding Our Future monies for vehicle replacements to avoid price increases due to anticipated tariffs. According to Fleet, the order was placed near the end of FY25 and will be arriving in the coming months. The majority of the $13 million was allocated to purchase vehicles that were ordered in 2025. There is a natural lead time on most vehicles, and Fleet is currently within the normal scope of those lead times. There are about 7 vehicles that were ordered prior to 2025, but the delay in delivery is not due to supply chain issues. These are fire engines that always have at least a few years in lead times due to the nature of the vehicle and the customization required. D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services (CIP Fund – One-time $414,753) The Administration is requesting the transfer of $414,753.24 from the holding account to CIP to fund two City Hall physical security improvement projects. These funds are part of the $586,867 allocated to the holding account through FY2023 Budget Amendment #5. The requested funding will support the following projects: 1.Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project – Cultural Landscape Report and Implementation Design Total: $380,000 •Cultural Landscape Report – $80,000 The Use and Conservancy Board provided Mayor Mendenhall a recommendation to perform a Cultural Landscape Report, estimated to cost $80,000. The report will ensure that any proposed security enhancements are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. •Project Implementation Design Phase – $300,000 The design plans will integrate vehicle ramming mitigation measures into Washington Square’s aesthetic and culturally significant layout. 2.Wireless Door Release System Total: $34,753.24 Several departments have requested wireless door release systems. The system will allow employees to remotely unlock secured doors via a computer and/or phone application. The intent is to reduce face-to- face interactions in unpredictable situations. The wireless door release system will increase employee safety and reduce confrontational incidents. Page | 8 Page | 9 D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward (Water Fund One-time $66,849,851, Sewer Fund one-time $12,083,142, Storm Water Fund one-time $7,349,551, Street Lighting Fund one-time $1,327,234) The request also includes funding associated with the Department’s Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs), Series 2025B, for which the Council adopted a parameters resolution for during its Sept. 2 formal meeting. As a reminder, the BANs are intended to finance the acquisition of property for the department’s future campus. This housekeeping budget amendment for the Department of Public Utilities would carry forward funding for items from the FY25 budget. These items include grant proceeds, capital purchases, and projects that were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed by the end of FY25. The request also includes funding associated with the department's Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs), Series 2025B, for which the Council adopted a parameters resolution during its Sept. 2 formal meeting. The BANs are intended to finance the acquisition of property for the department's future campus. Public Utilities indicated that the $50 million BANs and associated issuance costs will initially be fully accounted for in the department's Water Fund, which explains the high total amount in the Water Fund. The department intends to evaluate the allocation of these funds to determine the appropriate distribution across other funds. Upon a clear definition of the allocation, Public Utilities will prepare the necessary budget changes in a future budget amendment or in its FY27 budget. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract. (General Fund One-time, -$301,500 and +$301,500 (net $0)). Replacement funding for the City’s Volunteers of America (VOA) contract was inadvertently left out of the FY26 budget deliberations when the City’s State Mitigation Grant funding was shifted to PD-related items for FY26. The Housing Stability Division in CAN (the Community and Neighborhoods Department) used $100,500 of FY25 Funding Our Future funds to pay this contract for the first three months of FY26. The remainder of the amount needed to keep this item budget-neutral, $301,500, is proposed to come from not-yet-contracted FY26 Funding Our Future funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA contract pays for street outreach and the salary of a Safety and Community Liaison for the Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs). The Liaison conducts outreach to businesses and residents near the HRCs to address concerns related to homelessness. In future years, CAN proposes splitting this item into two separate contracts, one of $240,627 for VOA and the other of $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. This would facilitate shifting the Liaison position from VOA to Shelter the Homeless, which provides services (like maintaining building systems and security) that are more closely related to the core responsibilities of the Liaison. The Liaison’s coverage area would grow to include a half-mile radius around the HRCs, the Youth Resource Center, the YWCA, the Weigand Homeless Resource Center, and St. Vincent de Paul. CAN further requests that in the future this function be paid by the General Fund. Council Policy Question. Does the Council agree with the Administration’s proposal to shift $301,500 from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget to cover the FY26 VOA contract? D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward (Refuse Fund One-time $9,350,559) The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY25 to FY26. The majority of this amount (approximately $8.9 million) is for fleet vehicles for the Waste & Recycling Division. Broken out by division, $9,142,905 is for Sustainability’s Waste & Recycling Division and $207,654 for the Environment & Energy Division. Page | 10 D-13: CIP Housekeeping (CIP Fund – One-time $678,600 and $3,900,000) FY2025 Parks Impact Fees – Revenue and Expenditure Adjustment In the FY2025 Adopted Budget, Parks Impact Fee revenue was under reported by $678,600. While sufficient impact fees existed, the funds were not recognized as a revenue or expenditure in the Council Key Changes approved in June 2024; however, the funds were allocated in the August 2024 approval. This Budget Amendment increases the revenue by that amount to reflect the correct total. These funds have already been allocated to the Fairmont Park basketball court project. This amendment formally recognizes both the revenue and associated expenditure in the budget. FY25 Budget Amendment 3, Item A-4 – Fleet Block Property Sale: Infrastructure Development Condition Two corrections are needed for how funds from the Fleet Block property sale were budgeted in FY2025: 1. The funds should have been transferred from the CIP Surplus Land Fund (Fund 3039) to the CIP General Fund (Fund 3000). 2. The expenditure was incorrectly treated as a project rescope rather than a new appropriation from the Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment corrects both issues by transferring the funds appropriately and establishing the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion (Misc Grants – One-time $608,290) UDOT has awarded the City $608,290 in federal funding to support the expansion of the Green Bike Program. The City is required to provide a local match of $44,172. This funding will support the addition of approximately nine new Green Bike stations, which will include bicycles. The UDOT funds are currently held in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund and must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award. (Misc Grants – One-time $5,284) CAN was notified recently of an error in HUD’s calculation of 2023 and 2024 HOME-ARP awards. The City did not include funding contingencies in the HOME-ARP awards at the time because no change was anticipated in the amount. The Department proposes allocating this additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, which received the highest score in this category in the category of Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. E-3. Increased HUD HOPWA Award. (Misc Grants – One-time $26,832) CAN was notified recently that Salt Lake City’s FY26 HOPWA award is $26,832 over what was projected earlier. Per the contingencies approved in the Department’s estimated award amount, the Division of Housing Stability will receive an additional $804 for administration of these funds. Then, since the two HOPWA funding recipients both received more than their requested amounts for FY26, the Division proposes the remaining $26,028 be allocated to the highest-scoring of the two awardees, Utah Community Action. The organization has confirmed that the additional funds will allow them to serve approximately five more households with short- term rent or mortgage assistance, utility assistance, and/or supportive services. Section F: Donations None Section G: Council Consent Agenda – Grant Awards G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor' s Office (Misc Grants – One-time $596,025) The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) Fully funding an existing victim advocate. 2) The Prosecutor's office will hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims. 4) Funding for travel and training for staff. 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, Page | 11 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license to track statistics. The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The public hearing was held April 15, 2025. G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department (Misc Grants – One-time $256,518) The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is benefits for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. The public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (Misc Grants – One-time $579,834) This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City Police Department K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to the task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. The public hearing was held August 13, 2024. G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) (Misc Grants – One-time $9,029) Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. The public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025. G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 (Misc Grants – One-time $6,500) The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. The public hearing was held July 8, 2025. G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (Misc Grants – One- time $1,368,000) Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. A public hearing was held May 20, 2025. G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant (Misc Grants – One-time $33,900) The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research-based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025. Section I: Council Added Items None Page | 12 ATTACHMENTS 1. New Ongoing Costs to the General Fund 2. Civilian Chief of Staff Job Description 3. Internal Affairs Director Job Description ACRONYMS BEMS – Bureau of Emergency Service CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAN – Department of Community & Neighborhoods FTE – Full time Employee / Equivalent FY – Fiscal Year HOME – ARP – The HOME Investment Partnerships American Rescue Plan Program HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS HUD – Housing & Urban Development GF – General Fund IMS – Information Management Services OST – Out of School Time SFSP –Summer Food Service Program VOCA – Victims of Crime Act VSTRACKING – Victim Services Tracking Software YAGI – Youth Advocacy Grant Initiative Page | 12 Page | 13 Attachment 1: New Ongoing Costs to the General Fund Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Note that some items in the table below are partially or fully funded by grants. If a grant continues to be awarded to the City in future years, then there may not be a cost to the General Fund but grant funding is not guaranteed year-over-year. Budget Amendment Item Potential Cost to FY2026 Annual Budget Full Time Employ ee (FTEs) Notes BAM#2 D-3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward $159,414 Ongoing -0-CCAC recommended funding for multiple departments to address compensation for positions lagging behind market rate. Changes & funding weren’t included in annual budget. D-4 Language Access Transfer from Mayor’s Office $50,000 Ongoing -0- Contract language access services funding was inadvertently left out of IMS budget when it was transferred from Mayor’s to IMS during the annual budget. TOTAL $209,414 Page | 14 Attachment 2: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Description Page | 14 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 16 Page | 16 Page | 17 Attachment 3: Internal Affairs Director Job Description Page | 18 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/30/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/30/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/30/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/30/2025 Subject: FY 2026 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: An item was added for the Airport to provide assistance to federal partners impacted by the federal government shutdown Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Budget Impact: See attached documentation Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fifteen (15) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $137,008,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modi fied based on the decisions of the Council. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 1 of 4 Overview Overview Inactive No View As Of 09/11/2025 Date of Last Change 06/20/2025 11:05:29.781 PM Job Profile Name Communications Coordinator Job Code 002520 Include Job Code in Name No Job Profile Summary Performs full professional level communications and promotional work involved in preparing, implementing, and presenting a variety of departmental informational campaigns, communications, and knowledge-based materials for city operations. Works closely with senior executives to establish organizational messages and keep staff informed of key work initiatives and developments. Coordinates internal employee communications programs, including employee newsletters, brochures, policies and procedures manuals, and related communications. Creates, coordinates, and oversees the distribution and delivery of information across divisions. TYPICAL DUTIES: Participates in planning, developing, and implementing marketing strategies and employee engagement plans, projects, or programs. Ensures all plans are in alignment with the department’s overall mission and strategic plan. • Research, plan, draft, design, edit, and distribute various materials, including fact sheets, brochures, news articles, annual reports, and presentations. • Develops comprehensive timelines for projects and events, implements agreed upon communications strategy within budget. • Synthesizes complicated matters and data into an understandable context and follows through on inquiries, research requests, and drafting messages for approval. • Disseminates information pertinent to employees through newsletters, bulletins, email, presentations, print, or other communication techniques to reach employees out in the field. • Builds and coordinates social media output by creating communications for internal and external audiences and distributing information and materials for social media websites. • Supports emergency communication efforts and media management during a crisis.• Monitors and evaluates communication effectiveness to ensure employees utilize the information provided.• Archives and maintains department communications assets and publishing content on internal and external department websites. • May supervisor part time employees.• Perform other duties as assigned.• MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in English, Marketing, Communications, or a closely related field plus two to four years of professional-level experience performing communications, marketing, and/or • Job Description 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 2 of 4 public relations. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year-for-year basis. Creative ability to devise effective communication strategies.• Knowledge and familiarity with information technology, basic design, and digital editing is essential.• Excellent writing, editing, and proofreading skills.• Effective oral and written communication skills; excellent interpersonal skills.• Ability to resolve highly complex issues; develop and communicate new policies and procedures.• Ability to work effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and at various levels of the organization.• WORKING CONDITIONS: Generally comfortable working conditions requiring light physical effort. Intermittent sitting, standing, and walking. May require frequent travel between office and department or meeting location. • Considerable exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and job requirements.• The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified. All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE $ - $ DEPARTMENT XX Job Title Default Restrict to Country Management Level Individual Contributor Job Family Employee Marketing & Communications Specialist Job Classifications 600 - (Professional 600) PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Work Shift Required No Public Job Yes Referral Payment Plan 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 3 of 4 Characteristics Difficulty to Fill Critical Job No Compensation Compensation Grade E25 Compensation Grade Profile Impacted Eligibility Rules Business Process History Business Process History Business Process Effective Date Initiated On Completed On Status Edit Job Profile: Communications Coordinator 10/07/2024 10/07/2024 10:48:10 AM 10/07/2024 10:55:27 AM Successfully Completed Qualifications Certifications Certification Required Country Certification (Predefined)Certification (Not Predefined)Issuer (Not Predefined) Skills Skill Attributes Required Skill Skill Level Competencies Competencies from Other Sources Required Competency Target Rating Source Source Type Education Education Required Degree Field of Study Languages Languages 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 4 of 4 Required Language Ability Proficiency Responsibilities Responsibilities Required Responsibility Training Training Required Training Training Type Description Work Experience Work Experience Required Work Experience Experience Level Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Derived Logic Pay Pay Rate Type Pay Rate Types Country Pay Rate Type United States of America Salary Job Exempt Job Exempt Country / Country Region Job Exempt United States of America Yes Workers' Compensation Code Worker's Compensation Codes Workers' Compensation Code Country Country Region Location 3 - Clerical (United States of America)United States of America This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170,000 - $425,000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130,000 - $270,000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110,000 - $250,000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Communications Administrative DirectorCivilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. * Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 30, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $0.00 $913,000.00 IMS FUND 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 GOLF FUND 0.00 957,404.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 13,202,498.00 REFUSE FUND 0.00 9,350,559.00 WATER FUND 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 SEWER FUND 0.00 12,083,142.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 STREET LIGHTING FUND 0.00 1,327,234.00 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 0.00 94,791.00 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL SERV FUND 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 100,000.00 IMPACT FEES FUND 0.00 232,470.00 CIP FUND 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 TOTAL $71,326,282.76 $137,008,677.94 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments A revenue update and projection will be provided with the next budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will adjust to 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 14,931,953$ 78,854,192$ 93,786,145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%25.42%17.38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57% 29.74% 30.99% 25.42% 17.38% 18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (27,392,780) (27,392,780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (358,000) (358,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) (913,000) (913,000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 50,190,412 65,122,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32% 18.82% 19.52% 25.42% 11.06% 12.71% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,721,525 512,471,524 General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fifteen (15) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $137,008,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170,000 - $425,000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130,000 - $270,000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110,000 - $250,000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Civilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. * Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Second amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2025. ___________________________ Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed ___________________________ Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: ________________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2025. Published: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved as to Form /s/Jaysen Oldroyd 09/2/2025 Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF 0.00 350,000.00 One-time - 2 National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF 0.00 300,000.00 One-time - 3 Elected Officials Transition Costs GF 0.00 45,000.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (51,000.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (300,000.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (371,250.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S CIP 0.00 722,250.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Unallocated Park Impact Fees Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 One-time - 5 Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing - 6 Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 1.00 7 Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP 180,000.00 180,000.00 One-time - 8 Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP 70,000.00 70,000.00 One-time - 9 Take-home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 Ongoing - 10 CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Ongoing - 11 Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Airport 0.00 100,000.00 One-time - 1 Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF 0.00 168,000.00 One-time - 2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS 0.00 159,414.00 One-time - 3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS 0.00 2,241,881.18 One-time - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office IMS 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 5 Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf 0.00 957,404.00 One-time - 6 Green Bike Expansion CIP 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 7 Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP 6,355,027.04 6,355,027.04 One-time - 8 Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 One-time - 9 CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP 414,753.00 414,753.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 (301,500.00)One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 301,500.00 One-time - 12 Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 678,600.00 678,600.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 0.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 3,900,000.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 2 Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants 5,284.00 5,284.00 One-time - 3 Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants 26,832.00 26,832.00 One-time - Consent Agenda 1 VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants 596,025.60 596,025.60 Ongoing 3.00 2 VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants 256,518.12 256,518.12 Ongoing - 3 Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants 579,834.00 579,834.00 Ongoing - 4 Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS)Misc Grants 9,029.00 9,029.00 One-time - 5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants 6,500.00 6,500.00 One-time - 6 School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce ServicesMisc Grants 1,368,000.00 1,368,000.00 Ongoing - 7 Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants 33,900.00 33,900.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 137,008,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2: General Fund GF 0.00 913,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 IMS Fund IMS 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 0.00 0.00 3.00 Golf Fund Golf 0.00 957,404.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Fund Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 0.00 0.00 - Water Fund Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 0.00 0.00 - Sewer Fund Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 0.00 0.00 - Street Lighting Fund Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 0.00 0.00 - Governmental Immunity Fund Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 0.00 0.00 - Miscellaneous Special Service Fund Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Airport Fund Airport 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 0.00 0.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 137,008,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 53,881,754.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 27,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 - 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 43,102,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 - - - 2,248,700,014.83 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952 358,000.00 913,000.00 465,630,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 64,514,224.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 100,000.00 477,054,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 36,937,750.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 45,504,229.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 38,707,891.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 27,527,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 358,000.00 137,008,677.94 - - - 2,049,824,809.31 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF One-time $350,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Liz Rich For questions, please include Liz Rich, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker The Community and Neighborhood Department is requesting $350,000 for the Youth and Family (YF) Division to sustain current service levels and programming following the loss of the DWS Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant with a federal funding source. Salt Lake City previously received the TAP grant for three funding cycles (nine years) but was not awarded funding this year due to reduced statewide allocations and a shift in priority toward rural communities. Had it been awarded, the three-year TAP grant would have provided $1,008,000 to operate middle school programs across the city. This shortfall is compounded by the expiration of ARPA funds that once supported summer grants, as well as licensing requirements that mandate low staff-to-student ratios and the need to offer competitive wages for frontline staff. To maintain services, YF has strategically reviewed general fund allocations and streamlined programs and processes. However, a $350,000 funding gap remains, which impacts programming in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park. Youth & Family has already taken significant steps to maximize existing resources, aligning with its strategic plan. Once that plan is finalized this fall, YF will pursue new public and private funding opportunities. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF One-time $300,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nikola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola and Mary Beth Thompson As the City prepares to host the National League of Cities annual Cities Summit this November the administration is requesting an additional $300,000 to be added to the Council funds allocated in the annual budget. Ahead of the conference the City must pay for services related to conference contractual obligations, including transportation, venue rental, event catering, entertainment, printing, and more. This additional funding will allow the City to finalize all contractually required elements of the conference in the lead up to November while the Administration continues to work on raising sponsorship money for the event, which is anticipated to be ongoing into November. Sponsorship has a goal to raise $250,00 to offset conference costs to the City. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite finalization of conference plans. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs GF One-time $45,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman Amending the budget to include $45,000 for Transition expenses of Elected Officials pursuant to City Code 2.03.030 and the upcoming 2025 Municipal Election. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South CIP One-time ($51,000.00) CIP One-time ($300,000.00) CIP One-time ($371,250.00) Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 CIP One-time $722,250.00 Impact Fees One-time $232,470.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Ben Luedtke For questions, please include Ben Luedtke, Mike Atkinson and Mary Beth Thompson In response to the Council’s legislative intent from August 19 (copied below), the Administration is proposing to fully fund the $954,720 project from a mix of funding sources as listed below: • $232,470 of parks impact fees which would maximize the eligible portion of the project for 56 new trees, new median island noses / extensions, ADA access / crosswalks, and pollinator gardens, four benches, and public art. • $351,000 rescope of FY2024 CIP complete streets appropriation. These funds are available because the Virginia Street reconstruction project is finishing under budget and a State Street project that had grant funding pulled resulting in the local matching funds being made available for other complete street projects. The funds would be used for removing curb, adding eight inch curb, asphalt tie ins on four islands, demolition, erosion control, earthwork, and mobilization. • Rescope of $371,250 the $500,000 FY2025 CIP appropriation for adapting irrigation systems for irrigation system replacement, tree specific watering, sod removal, one-inch new topsoil, and at least 50% new sod for four islands, of which none has been expended. Note that the original appropriation included the medians from 300 South – 400 South but not from 400 South – 500 South. Legislative Intent: Budget Amendment Addressing Improvements to the Curb, Gutter, and Irrigation of the 1200 East Medians “I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians (CIP Project #25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” Project Description from the FY2026 CIP Funding Log: East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South and 400- 500 South) A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Redd For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Communications Administrative Director Grade A03 Requested Position Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Grade A03 Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Further Job Description information is included as an attachment in the amendment packet. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Internal Affairs Director Grade A03 (1) FTE Requested Position(s): Communications Coordinator - Social Media Content Grade E25 1 FTE Communications Coordinator - Communications Specialist Grade E25 1 FTE No additional funding is being requested. The Department would request a straw poll to allow for advertisement of the requested positions. Further Job Description information is included in the attachments in the amendment packet A straw poll is being requested on this item to expedite the recruitment of these positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $180,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City has received a from the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds were received and now need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for this afore mentioned expenditure. A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $70,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City received a $70,000 from Airgas for street modifications in front of their facility. Airgas desires to eliminate street racing events on 700 South. Airgas desires to have two speed tables installed near their Facility. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for the project. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt. Immunity One-time $94,791.00 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman and Lauree Roberts The request submitted with the annual budget was in anticipation of a proposed policy premium cost ($200,000); however, due to losses incurred between the time of the estimate (Dec 2024) and the July 1 decision deadline, the premium cost increased to $294,791. The difference in proposed cost to actual cost will be covered by the Government Immunity Fund while the budget amendment process proceeds. Since the allocation and budgetary approval was for a lesser amount, this serves as a request to increase the allocation considered for premium payment. A-10: CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Rev One-time $2,500,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jocob Maxwell / Lorena Riffo-Jenson For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson CBIA-25 - On April 1, 2025, the City Council adopted to re-establish the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional 3-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budget. As part of the adoption/allocation, $151,200 for the City's needs is to be transferred as "General Fund Expense" for the City's Administrative Fee. Also, $185,630 would need to be held in a reserve account. A-11: Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Airport One-time $100,000.00 Department: Airport Prepared By: Brian Butler For questions, please include Brian Butler, Shaun A nderson and Lorin Rollins The federal government will most likely shut down on October 1st. When a similar federal shutdown happened in 2019, the Airport administration aided its federal partners by providing food, household goods, and some gas cards so they could continue to come to work even though they weren't getting paid. The Airport now has more passengers going through the security checkpoint than ever before and is trying to not just support its federal partners but also do its best to limit the impact this federal shutdown will have to passengers traveling through the Airport. As such, the Airport administration would like to do something like what was done in 2019, and based on legal counsel's opinion, would like to get City Council approval and support for the necessary funding. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF One-time $168,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jacob Maxwell For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson In FY 2025, budget amendment #5, the City Council allocated $270,000 in Construction Mitigation Funds to continue supporting the eligible businesses within the local community that would be impacted by the major road reconstruction projects. From mid- May and all of June 2025, the Department of Economic Development (DED) deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the close of FY 2025. DED would like to request that the remaining $168,000 be carried forward into FY 2026, which amounts to 56 additional $3,000 grants to businesses. The construction projects that began in FY 2025 and are still impacting businesses in FY 2026 include: Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 • 2100 South (700 E – 1100 E) - ongoing • 2100 South Median (1100 E – 1300 E) – began spring 2025 • 1300 East (2100 S to 3300 S) - began spring 2025 • 300 West Bike Lane (900 S to 300 S) - began spring 2025 This item was highlighted as part of the FY 2026 annual budget, with the intent to address this need via budget amendment and the carry over process. D-2: IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS One-Time $159,414.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley As part of the FY 2026 budget, the Citizen Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) recommended funding for multiple city departments to address compensation for positions lagging the market. IMS was impacted and additional funding was recommended. Due to the timing of the IMS budget process, this funding was not captured in the IMS budget. IMS, with the use of the IMS Fund Balance, is now requesting this budget to be accounted for as part of the FY 2026 annual budget. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS One-time $2,241,881.18 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting carry forward budget from FY 2025 to FY 2026 to cover contract encumbrances that were established during FY 2025 but not yet been fully paid. Without this carry forward amendment, the contract payments would need to be paid from the FY 2026 budget, which isn’t sufficient to cover these costs. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office IMS Ongoing $50,000.00 GF Ongoing $50,000.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting $50,000 for the language access transfers needed to operate contract language access services within the city. These funds were previously part of the Mayor’s Office budget. However, the total amount allocated for Language Access was reduced from the Mayor’s Office budget; $50,000 was moved to the Justice Court, and $50,000 was transferred to IMS. However, the increase was inadvertently omitted from the IMS budget, requiring this amendment to add it in for FY 2026. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf One-time $957,404.00 Department: Public Lands - Golf Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans and Bryce Lindeman The Public Lands Department is requesting $957,404 for the Golf Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY 2025 but will be paid in FY 2026. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 D-6: Green Bike Expansion CIP One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance - CIP Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Mike Atkinson This amendment will establish a budget in CIP for funds received from UDOT for the expansion of the Green Bike program. $608,290 was received for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. The funds are received in the Miscellaneous Grants fund and must be transferred to CIP for the above-mentioned purposes. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP One-time $6,355,027.04 Department: Finance - Treasurer Prepared By: Jared Jenkins / Jou Ying Su For questions, please include Marina Scott, Jared Jenkins and Jou Ying Su Over the past few years, unspent proceeds from various bond issuances have earned interest while being deposited with trustees. This amendment will adjust the budgets to include interest for the various issuances to reflect the actual proceeds available. Greater detail on each is contained below. General Obligation Bond Series 2020, was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2021, was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $20,600,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2022, was issued in September 2022 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $21,785,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B&C, were issued in October 2022 for the purpose of financing several capital projects throughout the City. The bonds were issued at a par amount of $64,225.000. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2023, was issued in August 2023 to fund improvements of City parks and trails. Par value of the issued bonds was $24,765,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet One-time $13,202,498.00 Department: Public Services – Fleet Prepared By: Julie Crookston / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Julie Crookston, Kimberly Schmelling and Obreaee Hardy This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles/equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP One-time $414,753.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro / Nate Kobs / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro, Nate Kobs and Kimberly Schmelling Public Services is requesting the release of $414,753.24 from the CIP holding account for physical security improvements at City Hall. These funds were allocated in Budget Amendment #5, of FY 2023, and were placed in a holding account. After the last releases of funds, in January and September, 2024, the current unallocated balance in the holding account stands at $586,867.21, from which the $414,753 will come. This latest release is intended to support two critical projects under the Internal Security Program. 1. Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project - Cultural Landscape (CL) Report + Implementation Design ($380,000): The Use and Conservancy Board has voted on and provided their recommendation to Mayor Mendenhall to conduct the Cultural Landscape Report. The cost of the CL report is estimated to be $80,000 and will provide a comprehensive analysis of the historical, cultural and design elements of Washington Square, ensuring that any proposed security improvements, particularly ramming mitigation implementations, are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. The report will serve as a critical foundation for the Project Design phase, estimated at $300,000, which will develop detailed plans for integrating vehicle ramming mitigation measur es while maintaining the Square's aesthetic and cultural significance. Both the CLR and Implementation Design will be completed by the same firm to ensure continuity. 2. Wireless Door Release Systems - City Hall ($34,753.24): Several departments within City Hall have submitted requests for wireless door release systems. The systems provide employees with the ability to remotely unlock secured doors using a handheld or desktop control device. By minimizing direct face-to-face interactions in potentially volatile situations, these systems significantly improve employee safety and reduce the risk of confrontational incidents. D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water One-time $66,849,851.00 Sewer One-time $12,083,142.00 Storm Water One-time $7,349,551.00 Street Lighting One-time $1,327,234.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Lisa Tarufelli For questions, please include Lisa Tarufelli, Laura Briefer and Mark Christensen The items included in this housekeeping budget amendment for Public Utilities are carry forwards from the FY 2025 budget. These include grant proceeds, capital purchases and projects which were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed (final purchase order or contract) before June 30, 2025. During the Fiscal Year 2026 budget preparation process, it was anticipated the procurement process for these items would be completed prior to year end, thus they were not re-budgeted in FY 2026. The Bond Anticipation Notes were not anticipated during the budget process and will be executed prior to the next budget amendment. Public Utilities staff have been directed to include this transaction as part of this amendment. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract GF One-time ($301,500.00) GF One-time $301,500.00 Department: CAN – Housing Stability Prepared By: Tony Milner Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker In FY 2025, $402,000 was budgeted for the Volunteers of America (VOA) through the State Mitigation Grant. Since the grant is now focused on PD-related budgets for FY 2026, the VOA budget was inadvertently excluded during the FY 2026 budget process. CAN is now requesting that the VOA be funded through the General Fund. Housing Stability was able to use FY 2025 funds to extend the VOA contract for three months into FY 2026. As a result, the FY 2026 request is $301,500 rather than the full $402,000. To keep this request budget neutral, CAN proposes reallocating existing , not yet contracted funds. Specifically, $301,500 from FY 2026 Housing FOF funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA funding is utilized for street outreach and to pay a staff salary for a Safety and Community Liaison for the resource centers. For this year, the Liaison has been reorganized and placed under the Shelter the Homeless organization. As such, for FY 2026, CAN is also proposing to split the funding into two separate contracts: $240,627 for VOA and $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse One-time $9,350,559.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Debbie Lyons For questions, please include Debbie Lyons The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required in order to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY 2025 into FY 2026. D-13: CIP Housekeeping CIP One-time $678,600.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson FY25 Key Changes - Parks Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditure – In FY 2025, this item was underfunded by $678,600. This Budget Amendment will increase the amount of Revenue by $678,600. These funds have already been allocated the Fairmont Park Basketball court. This amendment will formalize the budget. FY25 BA3 A-4 Fleet Block Property Sale - Infrastructure Development Condition – In FY 2025, this item was first, not properly transferred from CIP Surplus Land Fund 3039 to CIP General Fund 3000, and second, treated like a rescope rather than a new expenditure from Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment properly transfers the funds and establishes the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey. This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $608,290 for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. Salt Lake City will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed by UDOT. These funds will be used to build additional bike stations. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants One-time $5,284.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This item recognizes $5,284 in new HUD HOME-ARP funding. On April 30, 2025, the City was notified of an error in HUD’s calculation of HOME-ARP allocations. As a result, the City will receive an additional $5,284, which requires a budget amendment to recognize the new funding for FY26. For context, in 2023 and 2024 the City approved a $3,533,195 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) award. Those funds were allocated to development projects, Tenant -Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) programs, and administration activities. Because the full award amount was assumed at the time of Council approval, no funding contingencies were included. The Administration now proposes allocating the additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, the highest -scoring applicant in the TBRA category. E-3: Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants One-time $26,832.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This is a housekeeping item to recognize an increased HUD HOPWA award of $26,832. The amendment is overall budget neutral. This action increases the FY26 appropriated budget from $945,200 to $972,032 to reflect the additional HOPWA funds awarded to Salt Lake City, which exceeded the original budget projection. As a reminder, on April 21, 2025, through Resolution 11 of 2025, the City Council approved FY26 HOPWA subrecipient awards along with contingency plans for distributing any additional funding. The Administration will follow these Council-approved contingencies to allocate the $26,832 increase to designated programs and subrecipients. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #1 G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants $596,025.60 Department: Attorney’s Office - Prosecutor Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tina Orme The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) The grant will now fully fund an existing victim advocate whose time is currently grant funded at 63.75%. 2) The grant will allow the Prosecutor's office to hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims 4) Funding for travel and training for staff 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license. Funding for the 1st year is $293,152.80, and the 2nd year is $302,872.80 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 10 The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The Mental Health workshops are designated to assist victims of violent crimes by being a part of a safe open group discussion and are led by an LCSW every month on a different topic such as: Healthy relationships, making and keeping boundaries, Anxiety, Self Worth, and other topics that would assist the victim with information, resources and education. The emergency fund assists the victim to cover the cost of immediate needs such as the travel necessary for stability and safety, obtaining the necessities of life if the victim left home with just the clothes they had on, or if the victim needs childcare while attending court. Finally, the Victim Services Tracking (VSTracking) software keeps track of all the statistics that the grants require. It also the Victim Advocates notes following communication with the victims, their wants/needs and the resources that the office gives out. Public hearing was held April 15, 2025 G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants $256,518.12 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is fringe for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants $579,834.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held August 13, 2024 G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) Misc Grants $9,029.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Brittany Blair Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. Public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 11 G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants $6,500.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Koty Lopez The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide nutritious snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. Public hearing was held July 8, 2025 G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Misc Grants $1,368,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. Each year, the following amounts are allocated from the $456,000 being provided; $ 382,889.52 for Salaries and Fringe for existing positions, $3,120 for Communications, $20,000 for client services, $5,000 for snacks, $30,070.48 for Materials and Supplies, and $3,000 for Professional Fees and Contract Services and $11,920 . A public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants $33,900.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025 Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2,788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1,018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 $777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank Proposed Job Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Code: New FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Supervisor Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Executives Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Job Description TYPICAL DUTIES: • Manage the Police Chief’s priorities, aligning command staff and department initiatives with the agency’s strategic goals. • Oversee or facilitate the development and implementation of strategic plans, reform initiatives, and performance measurement systems. • Lead or coordinate administrative functions such as budgeting, human resources, policy review, and special projects. • Serve as a liaison between the department and city administration, community partners, and other stakeholders. • Support cultural change efforts, workforce development, and modernization initiatives. • Drive high-priority initiatives across divisions, ensuring timelines, impact, and accountability are met. • Research, write and edit, or assists in the research, writing and editing, of speeches for the Police Chief and others as requested. Acts as Public Information Officer when assigned as such by the Police Chief or designee. • Keep Police Chief and/or command staff advised regarding the coordination of information dissemination. Works with GRAMA coordinator and/or legal counsel to ensure consistency and uniformity in position statements, and in dealing with members of the media. • Counsel command staff on public relations protocols and implication of issues vital to the well being and best interests of the City and Police Department. • Responsible for the Police Department’s communication materials including the design and content of the Department’s web site and social media. • Research, write, prepare, edit and oversee publication of the informational brochures/flyers and a broad range of other publications. • Coordinate photography, interviews, statistics and other needed information. Develops and directs radio, television, film and newspaper advertising campaigns. Writes letters, speeches and presentations. • Serve as Public Information Officer when directed. • Serve as the Department’s contact for local, national and international media. Responds to requests for specialized information, coordinates interviews/release of information and performs research on behalf of the media. • Direct or manage on camera interviews. • Direct or manage media releases and public information announcements, coordinates news conferences and handles the media in emergency response situations. Promotes the Police Department through positive media exposure and directs or manages the Department’s spokesperson. • Proofread, edit and analyze City and Police Department documents before they become public domain (budget books, policy papers, etc.). • As directed, coordinates and directs press conferences arranged by the Chief or designee. • Coordinate responses to issues raised by the public and other stakeholders and works with the Mayor’s Office in this endeavor to ensure consistent reaction while tracking issues and responses. • Establish and maintain strong working relationships with internal bureaus and units as well as other departments within the city, county and state to promote collaboration, to include participating in monthly city communications coordination meetings acting as the police department’s representative. • Seek out, coordinate, and engage in all department outreach programs and community engagements to leverage involvement and face-to-face interactions on behalf of the Department. • Coordinate annual events such as the Fallen Officer Memorial, Awards Gala, and Police Week activities for the department, to include engaging key attendees, creating branding and programs, finalizing script, and working closely with involved committees. • Evaluate success and establish mechanisms for feedback through two-way communication channels to meet department goals, to include developing cross sector partnerships that allow for ongoing and substantive dialogues on community needs and vision. • Establish and maintain associations and contacts with national, state and local representatives to ensure the Department is properly represented within the industry and local community as well as with the public. • Manage designs, order, and update all public education and recruiting collateral in conjunction with CompStat assignments, outreach programs, and community engagement. • Oversee all daily press releases (Watch Logs, wanted persons, public warnings, media advisories, etc.) and confers with counsel on release of information. • Performs other duties as assigned. PREFERED QUALIFICATIONS: • Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Broadcast Media, English, Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Political Science or a related field. At least five years’ experience in journalism or public relations; experience in broadcast television and in management preferred. • Ability to interact effectively with police personnel, department heads, government and business leaders, and others in positions of authority and influence. • Demonstrated superior communications skills, including the ability to deal effectively with members of both broadcast and print media and to appear on behalf of the Chief, and Police Department on radio or broadcast television. • Preference may be given to applicants with local media experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: • Light physical effort. Mostly comfortable working positions, handling light weights, intermittent sitting, standing, and walking. • Frequent exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and the requirements of the job. The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified. All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. • Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE $ - $ DEPARTMENT XX Created on August 27, 2025 Created by Aubrey Garduno, HRBP This page has intentionally been left blank Current Position: Job Title: 0035504 Internal Affairs Administrative Director Job Code: 002525 FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Division Director Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: OFFICIALS_AND_ADMINISTRATORS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Management Analyst Base Comp: $164,750.83 ($187,946) Proposed: Communications Coordinator (Job Profile attached) (1) Social Media Content Creator (1) Communication Specialist This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/ 23/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/ 23/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/ 23/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/ 23/2025 Subject: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fourteen (14) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $136,908,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassication in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor ’s Oce.A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modied based on the decisions of the Council.Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 23, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $0.00 $913,000.00 IMS FUND 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 GOLF FUND 0.00 957,404.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 13,202,498.00 REFUSE FUND 0.00 9,350,559.00 WATER FUND 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 SEWER FUND 0.00 12,083,142.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 STREET LIGHTING FUND 0.00 1,327,234.00 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 0.00 94,791.00 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL SERV FUND 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 IMPACT FEES FUND 0.00 232,470.00 CIP FUND 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 TOTAL $71,326,282.76 $136,908,677.94 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments A revenue update and projection will be provided with the next budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will adjust to 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146, 448, 554 174,290, 532 14,931, 953 78,854, 192 93,786, 145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127, 790, 739$ 152,085, 598$ 14,931, 953$ 78,854, 192$ 93,786, 145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30. 50%31.66%25.42%17. 38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188, 435) ( 3,188, 435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124, 602, 304 148,897, 163 14,931, 953 78,854, 192 93,786, 145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57%29. 74%30.99%25.42%17. 38%18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664, 442) (40,827, 348) - ( 27,392, 780) ( 27,392, 780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469, 408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468, 933) ( 2,468, 933) (358, 000) (358, 000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407, 524) ( 3,407, 524) (913, 000) (913, 000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904, 861 3,904, 861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959, 861) ( 3,959, 861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013, 067 1,013, 067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736, 688) ( 9,936, 688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 50,190,412 65,122,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32%18. 82%19.52%25.42%11. 06%12.71% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419, 006, 975 480,404, 359 58,749, 999 453, 721, 525 512,471, 524 General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2026BudgetFY2025Budget The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913, 000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fourteen (14) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $136,908, 678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 Second amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2025. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2025. Published: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved as to Form s/Jaysen Oldroyd 09/2/2025 Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF 0.00 350,000.00 One-time - 2 National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF 0.00 300,000.00 One-time - 3 Elected Officials Transition Costs GF 0.00 45,000.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (51,000.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (300,000.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (371,250.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S CIP 0.00 722,250.00 One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Unallocated Park Impact Fees Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 One-time 5 Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 6 Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 1.00 7 Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP 180,000.00 180,000.00 One-time 8 Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP 70,000.00 70,000.00 One-time 9 Take-home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 Ongoing 10 CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Ongoing 1 Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF 0.00 168,000.00 One-time - 2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS 0.00 159,414.00 One-time - 3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS 0.00 2,241,881.18 One-time - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office IMS 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 50,000.00 Ongoing 5 Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf 0.00 957,404.00 One-time - 6 Green Bike Expansion CIP 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 7 Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP 6,355,027.04 6,355,027.04 One-time - 8 Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 One-time - 9 CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP 414,753.00 414,753.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 (301,500.00)One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 301,500.00 One-time - 12 Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 678,600.00 678,600.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 0.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 3,900,000.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 CouncilApprovedAdministrationProposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 2 Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants 5,284.00 5,284.00 One-time - 3 Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants 26,832.00 26,832.00 One-time - Consent Agenda 1 VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants 596,025.60 596,025.60 Ongoing 3.00 2 VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants 256,518.12 256,518.12 Ongoing - 3 Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants 579,834.00 579,834.00 Ongoing - 4 Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS)Misc Grants 9,029.00 9,029.00 One-time - 5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants 6,500.00 6,500.00 One-time - 6 School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce ServicesMiscGrants 1,368,000.00 1,368,000.00 Ongoing - 7 Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants 33,900.00 33,900.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 136,908,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2: General Fund GF 0.00 913,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 IMS Fund IMS 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 0.00 0.00 3.00 Golf Fund Golf 0.00 957,404.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Fund Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 0.00 0.00 - Water Fund Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 0.00 0.00 - Sewer Fund Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 0.00 0.00 - Street Lighting Fund Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 0.00 0.00 - Governmental Immunity Fund Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 0.00 0.00 - Miscellaneous Special Service Fund Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 0.00 0.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 136,908,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 53,881,754.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 27,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 43,102,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 - - - 2,248,700,014.83 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464, 359,952 358,000.00 913,000.00 465,630,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 64,514,224.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 476,954,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 36,937,750.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 45,504,229.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 38,707,891.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 27,527,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 358,000.00 136,908,677.94 - - - 2,049,724,809.31 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF One-time $350,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Liz Rich For questions, please include Liz Rich, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker The Community and Neighborhood Department is requesting $350,000 for the Youth and Family (YF) Division to sustain current service levels and programming following the loss of the DWS Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant with a federal funding source. Salt Lake City previously received the TAP grant for three funding cycles (nine years) but was not awarded funding this year due to reduced statewide allocations and a shift in priority toward rural communities. Had it been awarded, the three-year TAP grant would have provided $1,008,000 to operate middle school programs across the city. This shortfall is compounded by the expiration of ARPA funds that once supported summer grants, as well as licensing requirements that mandate low staff-to-student ratios and the need to offer competitive wages for frontline staff. To maintain services, YF has strategically reviewed general fund allocations and streamlined programs and processes. However, a $350,000 funding gap remains, which impacts programming in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park. Youth & Family has already taken significant steps to maximize existing resources, aligning with its strategic plan. Once that plan is finalized this fall, YF will pursue new public and private funding opportunities. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF One-time $300,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nikola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola and Mary Beth Thompson As the City prepares to host the National League of Cities annual Cities Summit this November the administration is requesting an additional $300,000 to be added to the Council funds allocated in the annual budget. Ahead of the conference the City must pay for services related to conference contractual obligations, including transportation, venue rental, event catering, entertainment, printing, and more. This additional funding will allow the City to finalize all contractually required elements of the conference in the lead up to November while the Administration continues to work on raising sponsorship money for the event, which is anticipated to be ongoing into November. Sponsorship has a goal to raise $250,00 to offset conference costs to the City. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite finalization of conference plans. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs GF One-time $45,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman Amending the budget to include $45,000 for Transition expenses of Elected Officials pursuant to City Code 2.03.030 and the upcoming 2025 Municipal Election. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South CIP One-time ($51,000.00) CIP One-time ($300,000.00) CIP One-time ($371,250.00) Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 CIP One-time $722,250.00 Impact Fees One-time $232,470.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Ben Luedtke For questions, please include Ben Luedtke, Mike Atkinson and Mary Beth Thompson In response to the Council’s legislative intent from August 19 (copied below), the Administration is proposing to fully fund the $954,720 project from a mix of funding sources as listed below: 232,470 of parks impact fees which would maximize the eligible portion of the project for 56 new trees, new median island noses / extensions, ADA access / crosswalks, and pollinator gardens, four benches, and public art. 351,000 rescope of FY2024 CIP complete streets appropriation. These funds are available because the Virginia Street reconstruction project is finishing under budget and a State Street project that had grant funding pulled resulting in the local matching funds being made available for other complete street projects. The funds would be used for removing curb, adding eight inch curb, asphalt tie ins on four islands, demolition, erosion control, earthwork, and mobilization. Rescope of $371,250 the $500,000 FY2025 CIP appropriation for adapting irrigation systems for irrigation system replacement, tree specific watering, sod removal, one-inch new topsoil, and at least 50% new sod for four islands, of which none has been expended. Note that the original appropriation included the medians from 300 South – 400 South but not from 400 South – 500 South. Legislative Intent: Budget Amendment Addressing Improvements to the Curb, Gutter, and Irrigation of the 1200 East Medians I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians (CIP Project #25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” Project Description from the FY2026 CIP Funding Log: East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South and 400- 500 South) A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Redd For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Communications Administrative Director Grade A03 Requested Position Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Grade A03 Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 Further Job Description information is included as an attachment in the amendment packet. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Internal Affairs Director Grade A03 (1) FTE Requested Position(s): Communications Coordinator - Social Media Content Grade E25 1 FTE Communications Coordinator - Communications Specialist Grade E25 1 FTE No additional funding is being requested. The Department would request a straw poll to allow for advertisement of the requested positions. Further Job Description information is included in the attachments in the amendment packet A straw poll is being requested on this item to expedite the recruitment of these positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $180,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City has received a from the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds were received and now need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for this afore mentioned expenditure. A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $70,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City received a $70,000 from Airgas for street modifications in front of their facility. Airgas desires to eliminate street racing events on 700 South. Airgas desires to have two speed tables installed near their Facility. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for the project. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt. Immunity One-time $94,791.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman and Lauree Roberts The request submitted with the annual budget was in anticipation of a proposed policy premium cost ($200,000); however, due to losses incurred between the time of the estimate (Dec 2024) and the July 1 decision deadline, the premium cost increased to $294,791. The difference in proposed cost to actual cost will be covered by the Government Immunity Fund while the budget amendment process proceeds. Since the allocation and budgetary approval was for a lesser amount, this serves as a request to increase the allocation considered for premium payment. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 A-10: CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Rev One-time $2,500,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jocob Maxwell / Lorena Riffo- Jenson For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson CBIA-25 - On April 1, 2025, the City Council adopted to re-establish the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional 3-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budget. As part of the adoption/allocation, $151,200 for the City's needs is to be transferred as "General Fund Expense" for the City's Administrative Fee. Also, $185,630 would need to be held in a reserve account. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF One-time $168,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jacob Maxwell For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson In FY 2025, budget amendment #5, the City Council allocated $270,000 in Construction Mitigation Funds to continue supporting the eligible businesses within the local community that would be impacted by the major road reconstruction projects. From mid- May and all of June 2025, the Department of Economic Development (DED) deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the close of FY 2025. DED would like to request that the remaining $168,000 be carried forward into FY 2026, which amounts to 56 additional $3,000 grants to businesses. The construction projects that began in FY 2025 and are still impacting businesses in FY 2026 include: 2100 South (700 E – 1100 E) - ongoing 2100 South Median (1100 E – 1300 E) – began spring 2025 1300 East (2100 S to 3300 S) - began spring 2025 300 West Bike Lane (900 S to 300 S) - began spring 2025 This item was highlighted as part of the FY 2026 annual budget, with the intent to address this need via budget amendment and the carry over process. D-2: IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS One-Time $159,414.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley As part of the FY 2026 budget, the Citizen Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) recommended funding for multiple city departments to address compensation for positions lagging the market. IMS was impacted and additional funding was recommended. Due to the timing of the IMS budget process, this funding was not captured in the IMS budget. IMS, with the use of the IMS Fund Balance, is now requesting this budget to be accounted for as part of the FY 2026 annual budget. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS One-time $2,241,881.18 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting carry forward budget from FY 2025 to FY 2026 to cover contract encumbrances that were established during FY 2025 but not yet been fully paid. Without this carry forward amendment, the contract payments would need to be paid from the FY 2026 budget, which isn’t sufficient to cover these costs. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office IMS Ongoing $50,000.00 GF Ongoing $50,000.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting $50,000 for the language access transfers needed to operate contract language access services within the city. These funds were previously part of the Mayor’s Office budget. However, the total amount allocated for Language Access was reduced from the Mayor’s Office budget; $50,000 was moved to the Justice Court, and $50,000 was transferred to IMS. However, the increase was inadvertently omitted from the IMS budget, requiring this amendment to add it in for FY 2026. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf One-time $957,404.00 Department: Public Lands - Golf Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans and Bryce Lindeman The Public Lands Department is requesting $957,404 for the Golf Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY 2025 but will be paid in FY 2026. D-6: Green Bike Expansion CIP One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance - CIP Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Mike Atkinson This amendment will establish a budget in CIP for funds received from UDOT for the expansion of the Green Bike program. $608,290 was received for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. The funds are received in the Miscellaneous Grants fund and must be transferred to CIP for the above-mentioned purposes. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP One-time $6,355,027.04 Department: Finance - Treasurer Prepared By: Jared Jenkins / Jou Ying Su For questions, please include Marina Scott, Jared Jenkins and Jou Ying Su Over the past few years, unspent proceeds from various bond issuances have earned interest while being deposited with trustees. This amendment will adjust the budgets to include interest for the various issuances to reflect the actual proceeds available. Greater detail on each is contained below. General Obligation Bond Series 2020, was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from July 2024 through July 2025. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 General Obligation Bonds Series 2021, was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $20,600,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2022, was issued in September 2022 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $21,785,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B&C, were issued in October 2022 for the purpose of financing several capital projects throughout the City. The bonds were issued at a par amount of $64,225.000. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2023, was issued in August 2023 to fund improvements of City parks and trails. Par value of the issued bonds was $24,765,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet One-time $13,202,498.00 Department: Public Services – Fleet Prepared By: Julie Crookston / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Julie Crookston, Kimberly Schmelling and Obreaee Hardy This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles/equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP One-time $414,753.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro / Nate Kobs / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro, Nate Kobs and Kimberly Schmelling Public Services is requesting the release of $414,753.24 from the CIP holding account for physical security improvements at City Hall. These funds were allocated in Budget Amendment #5, of FY 2023, and were placed in a holding account. After the last releases of funds, in January and September, 2024, the current unallocated balance in the holding account stands at $586,867.21, from which the $414,753 will come. This latest release is intended to support two critical projects under the Internal Security Program. 1. Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project - Cultural Landscape (CL) Report + Implementation Design ($380,000): The Use and Conservancy Board has voted on and provided their recommendation to Mayor Mendenhall to conduct the Cultural Landscape Report. The cost of the CL report is estimated to be 80,000 and will provide a comprehensive analysis of the historical, cultural and design elements of Washington Square, ensuring that any proposed security improvements, particularly ramming mitigation implementations, are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. The report will serve as a critical foundation for the Project Design phase, estimated at $300,000, which will develop detailed plans for integrating vehicle ramming mitigation measures while maintaining the Square's aesthetic and cultural significance. Both the CLR and Implementation Design will be completed by the same firm to ensure continuity. 2. Wireless Door Release Systems - City Hall ($34,753.24): Several departments within City Hall have submitted requests for wireless door release systems. The systems provide employees with the ability to Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 remotely unlock secured doors using a handheld or desktop control device. By minimizing direct face-to-face interactions in potentially volatile situations, these systems significantly improve employee safety and reduce the risk of confrontational incidents. D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water One-time $66,849,851.00 Sewer One-time $12,083,142.00 Storm Water One-time $7,349,551.00 Street Lighting One-time $1,327,234.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Lisa Tarufelli For questions, please include Lisa Tarufelli, Laura Briefer and Mark Christensen The items included in this housekeeping budget amendment for Public Utilities are carry forwards from the FY 2025 budget. These include grant proceeds, capital purchases and projects which were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed (final purchase order or contract) before June 30, 2025. During the Fiscal Year 2026 budget preparation process, it was anticipated the procurement process for these items would be completed prior to year end, thus they were not re-budgeted in FY 2026. The Bond Anticipation Notes were not anticipated during the budget process and will be executed prior to the next budget amendment. Public Utilities staff have been directed to include this transaction as part of this amendment. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract GF One-time ($301,500.00) GF One-time $301,500.00 Department: CAN – Housing Stability Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker In FY 2025, $402,000 was budgeted for the Volunteers of America (VOA) through the State Mitigation Grant. Since the grant is now focused on PD-related budgets for FY 2026, the VOA budget was inadvertently excluded during the FY 2026 budget process. CAN is now requesting that the VOA be funded through the General Fund. Housing Stability was able to use FY 2025 funds to extend the VOA contract for three months into FY 2026. As a result, the FY 2026 request is $301,500 rather than the full $402,000. To keep this request budget neutral, CAN proposes reallocating existing , not yet contracted funds. Specifically, 301,500 from FY 2026 Housing FOF funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA funding is utilized for street outreach and to pay a staff salary for a Safety and Community Liaison for the resource centers. For this year, the Liaison has been reorganized and placed under the Shelter the Homeless organization. As such, for FY 2026, CAN is also proposing to split the funding into two separate contracts: $240,627 for VOA and $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse One-time $9,350,559.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Debbie Lyons For questions, please include Debbie Lyons The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required in order to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY 2025 into FY 2026. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 D-13: CIP Housekeeping CIP One-time $678,600.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson FY25 Key Changes - Parks Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditure – In FY 2025, this item was underfunded by $678,600. This Budget Amendment will increase the amount of Revenue by $678,600. These funds have already been allocated the Fairmont Park Basketball court. This amendment will formalize the budget. FY25 BA3 A-4 Fleet Block Property Sale - Infrastructure Development Condition – In FY 2025, this item was first, not properly transferred from CIP Surplus Land Fund 3039 to CIP General Fund 3000, and second, treated like a rescope rather than a new expenditure from Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment properly transfers the funds and establishes the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey. This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $608,290 for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. Salt Lake City will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed by UDOT. These funds will be used to build additional bike stations. E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants One-time $5,284.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This item recognizes $5,284 in new HUD HOME-ARP funding. On April 30, 2025, the City was notified of an error in HUD’s calculation of HOME -ARP allocations. As a result, the City will receive an additional $5,284, which requires a budget amendment to recognize the new funding for FY26. For context, in 2023 and 2024 the City approved a $3,533,195 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) award. Those funds were allocated to development projects, Tenant -Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) programs, and administration activities. Because the full award amount was assumed at the time of Council approval, no funding contingencies were included. The Administration now proposes allocating the additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, the highest -scoring applicant in the TBRA category. E-3: Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants One-time $26,832.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This is a housekeeping item to recognize an increased HUD HOPWA award of $26,832. The amendment is overall budget neutral. This action increases the FY26 appropriated budget from $945,200 to $972,032 to reflect the additional HOPWA funds awarded to Salt Lake City, which exceeded the original budget projection. As a reminder, on April 21, 2025, through Resolution 11 of 2025, the City Council approved FY26 HOPWA subrecipient awards along with contingency plans for distributing any additional funding. The Administration will follow these Council-approved contingencies to allocate the $26,832 increase to designated programs and subrecipients. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #1 G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants $596,025.60 Department: Attorney’s Office - Prosecutor Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tina Orme The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) The grant will now fully fund an existing victim advocate whose time is currently grant funded at 63.75%. 2) The grant will allow the Prosecutor's office to hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims 4) Funding for travel and training for staff 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license. Funding for the 1st year is $293,152.80, and the 2nd year is $302,872.80 The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The Mental Health workshops are designated to assist victims of violent crimes by being a part of a safe open group discussion and are led by an LCSW every month on a different topic such as: Healthy relationships, making and keeping boundaries, Anxiety, Self Worth, and other topics that would assist the victim with information, resources and education. The emergency fund assists the victim to cover the cost of immediate needs such as the travel necessary for stability and safety, obtaining the necessities of life if the victim left home with just the clothes they had on, or if the victim needs childcare while attending court. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 10 Finally, the Victim Services Tracking (VSTracking) software keeps track of all the statistics that the grants require. It also the Victim Advocates notes following communication with the victims, their wants/needs and the resources that the office gives out. Public hearing was held April 15, 2025 G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants $256,518.12 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is fringe for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants $579,834.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held August 13, 2024 G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) Misc Grants $9,029.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Brittany Blair Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. Public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025 G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants $6,500.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Koty Lopez The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide nutritious snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. Public hearing was held July 8, 2025 G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Misc Grants $1,368,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 11 Each year, the following amounts are allocated from the $456,000 being provided; $ 382,889.52 for Salaries and Fringe for existing positions, $3,120 for Communications, $20,000 for client services, $5,000 for snacks, $30,070.48 for Materials and Supplies, and $3,000 for Professional Fees and Contract Services and $11,920 . A public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants $33,900.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025 Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2, 788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1, 018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank Proposed Job Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Code: New FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Supervisor Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Executives Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Job Description TYPICAL DUTIES: Manage the Police Chief’s priorities, aligning command staff and department initiatives with the agency’s strategic goals. Oversee or facilitate the development and implementation of strategic plans, reform initiatives, and performance measurement systems. Lead or coordinate administrative functions such as budgeting, human resources, policy review, and special projects. Serve as a liaison between the department and city administration, community partners, and other stakeholders. Support cultural change efforts, workforce development, and modernization initiatives. Drive high-priority initiatives across divisions, ensuring timelines, impact, and accountability are met. Research, write and edit, or assists in the research, writing and editing, of speeches for the Police Chief and others as requested. Acts as Public Information Officer when assigned as such by the Police Chief or designee. Keep Police Chief and/or command staff advised regarding the coordination of information dissemination. Works with GRAMA coordinator and/or legal counsel to ensure consistency and uniformity in position statements, and in dealing with members of the media. Counsel command staff on public relations protocols and implication of issues vital to the well being and best interests of the City and Police Department. Responsible for the Police Department’s communication materials including the design and content of the Department’s web site and social media. Research, write, prepare, edit and oversee publication of the informational brochures/flyers and a broad range of other publications. Coordinate photography, interviews, statistics and other needed information. Develops and directs radio, television, film and newspaper advertising campaigns. Writes letters, speeches and presentations. Serve as Public Information Officer when directed. Serve as the Department’s contact for local, national and international media. Responds to requests for specialized information, coordinates interviews/release of information and performs research on behalf of the media. Direct or manage on camera interviews. Direct or manage media releases and public information announcements, coordinates news conferences and handles the media in emergency response situations. Promotes the Police Department through positive media exposure and directs or manages the Department’s spokesperson. Proofread, edit and analyze City and Police Department documents before they become public domain (budget books, policy papers, etc.). As directed, coordinates and directs press conferences arranged by the Chief or designee. Coordinate responses to issues raised by the public and other stakeholders and works with the Mayor’s Office in this endeavor to ensure consistent reaction while tracking issues and responses. Establish and maintain strong working relationships with internal bureaus and units as well as other departments within the city, county and state to promote collaboration, to include participating in monthly city communications coordination meetings acting as the police department’s representative. Seek out, coordinate, and engage in all department outreach programs and community engagements to leverage involvement and face-to-face interactions on behalf of the Department. Coordinate annual events such as the Fallen Officer Memorial, Awards Gala, and Police Week activities for the department, to include engaging key attendees, creating branding and programs, finalizing script, and working closely with involved committees. Evaluate success and establish mechanisms for feedback through two-way communication channels to meet department goals, to include developing cross sector partnerships that allow for ongoing and substantive dialogues on community needs and vision. Establish and maintain associations and contacts with national, state and local representatives to ensure the Department is properly represented within the industry and local community as well as with the public. Manage designs, order, and update all public education and recruiting collateral in conjunction with CompStat assignments, outreach programs, and community engagement. Oversee all daily press releases (Watch Logs, wanted persons, public warnings, media advisories, etc.) and confers with counsel on release of information. Performs other duties as assigned. PREFERED QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Broadcast Media, English, Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Political Science or a related field. At least five years’ experience in journalism or public relations; experience in broadcast television and in management preferred. Ability to interact effectively with police personnel, department heads, government and business leaders, and others in positions of authority and influence. Demonstrated superior communications skills, including the ability to deal effectively with members of both broadcast and print media and to appear on behalf of the Chief, and Police Department on radio or broadcast television. Preference may be given to applicants with local media experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: Light physical effort. Mostly comfortable working positions, handling light weights, intermittent sitting, standing, and walking. Frequent exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and the requirements of the job. The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified. All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE DEPARTMENT XX Created on August 27, 2025 Created by Aubrey Garduno, HRBP This page has intentionally been left blank Current Position: Job Title: 0035504 Internal Affairs Administrative Director Job Code: 002525 FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Division Director Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: OFFICIALS_AND_ADMINISTRATORS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Management Analyst Base Comp: $164,750.83 ($187,946) Proposed: Communications Coordinator (Job Profile attached) 1) Social Media Content Creator 1) Communication Specialist This page has intentionally been left blank 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 1 of 4 Overview Overview Inactive No View As Of 09/11/ 2025 Date of Last Change 06/20/ 2025 11:05:29.781 PM Job Profile Name Communications Coordinator Job Code 002520 Include Job Code in Name No Job Profile Summary Performs full professional level communications and promotional work involved in preparing, implementing, and presenting a variety of departmental informational campaigns, communications, and knowledge-based materials for city operations. Works closely with senior executives to establish organizational messages and keep staff informed of key work initiatives and developments. Coordinates internal employee communications programs, including employee newsletters, brochures, policies and procedures manuals, and related communications. Creates, coordinates, and oversees the distribution and delivery of information across divisions. TYPICAL DUTIES: Participates in planning, developing, and implementing marketing strategies and employee engagement plans, projects, or programs. Ensures all plans are in alignment with the department’s overall mission and strategic plan. Research, plan, draft, design, edit, and distribute various materials, including fact sheets, brochures, news articles, annual reports, and presentations. Develops comprehensive timelines for projects and events, implements agreed upon communications strategy within budget. Synthesizes complicated matters and data into an understandable context and follows through on inquiries, research requests, and drafting messages for approval. Disseminates information pertinent to employees through newsletters, bulletins, email, presentations, print, or other communication techniques to reach employees out in the field. Builds and coordinates social media output by creating communications for internal and external audiences and distributing information and materials for social media websites. Supports emergency communication efforts and media management during a crisis.• Monitors and evaluates communication effectiveness to ensure employees utilize the information provided.• Archives and maintains department communications assets and publishing content on internal and external department websites. May supervisor part time employees.• Perform other duties as assigned.• MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in English, Marketing, Communications, or a closely related field plus two to four years of professional-level experience performing communications, marketing, and/or Job Description 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 2 of 4 public relations.Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year-for-year basis. Creative ability to devise effective communication strategies.• Knowledge and familiarity with information technology, basic design, and digital editing is essential.• Excellent writing, editing, and proofreading skills.• Effective oral and written communication skills; excellent interpersonal skills.• Ability to resolve highly complex issues; develop and communicate new policies and procedures.• Ability to work effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and at various levels of the organization.• WORKING CONDITIONS: Generally comfortable working conditions requiring light physical effort.Intermittent sitting, standing, and walking.May require frequent travel between office and department or meeting location. Considerable exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and job requirements.• The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job.They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified.All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE DEPARTMENT XX Job Title Default Restrict to Country Management Level Individual Contributor Job Family Employee Marketing & Communications Specialist Job Classifications 600 - (Professional 600) PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Work Shift Required No Public Job Yes Referral Payment Plan 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 3 of 4 Characteristics Difficulty to Fill Critical Job No Compensation Compensation Grade E25 Compensation Grade Profile Impacted Eligibility Rules Business Process History Business Process History Business Process Effective Date Initiated On Completed On Status Edit Job Profile: Communications Coordinator 10/07/2024 10/ 07/2024 10:48: 10 AM 10/07/2024 10:55:27 AM Successfully Completed Qualifications Certifications Certification Required Country Certification (Predefined)Certification (Not Predefined)Issuer (Not Predefined) Skills Skill Attributes Required Skill Skill Level Competencies Competencies from Other Sources Required Competency Target Rating Source Source Type Education Education Required Degree Field of Study Languages Languages 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 4 of 4 Required Language Ability Proficiency Responsibilities Responsibilities Required Responsibility Training Training Required Training Training Type Description Work Experience Work Experience Required Work Experience Experience Level Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Derived Logic Pay Pay Rate Type Pay Rate Types Country Pay Rate Type United States of America Salary Job Exempt Job Exempt Country / Country Region Job Exempt United States of America Yes Workers' Compensation Code Worker's Compensation Codes Workers' Compensation Code Country Country Region Location 3 - Clerical (United States of America)United States of America This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170, 000 - $ 425, 000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130, 000 - $ 270, 000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110, 000 - $ 250, 000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be ninety percent (90%) of the salary of a district court judge.JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 Justice Court Administrator E37 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 Community Outreach Special Projects & Access Coordinator E24 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Communications Administrative DirectorCivilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170, 000 - $ 425, 000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130, 000 - $ 270, 000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110, 000 - $ 250, 000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be ninety percent (90%) of the salary of a district court judge.JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 Justice Court Administrator E37 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 Community Outreach Special Projects & Access Coordinator E24 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Civilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank Item B9 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Allison Rowland, Senior Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: PUBLIC HEARING: U.S. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT GENERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS 2026-2027 Staff note: This is the first of two annual public hearings required by HUD, and the Council only needs to close the public hearing at this point. The second public hearing occurs each spring when the Council considers funding awards for specific service providers. MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing. MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. Item B10 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Allison Rowland, Senior Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: PUBLIC HEARING: 203 WEST PAXTON AVENUE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Staff note: The Federal regulations for TEFRA hearings do not require the Council to take any action beyond closing the public hearing. MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council close the public hearing. MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future date. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/09/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/09/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Najarro, Andrea E-mail andrea.najarro@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/09/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/09/2025 Subject: TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) public hearing for Paxton Avenue affordable housing project Additional Staff Contact: Mary Beth ThompsonMarina ScottJaysen Oldroyd Presenters/Staff Table Mary Beth ThompsonMarina ScottJaysen Oldroyd Document Type Information Item Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council hold a TEFRA hearing on October 7, 2025. Background/Discussion Pax Station Apartments LLC, a Utah limited liability company, the sole member of which is Patriot Services Group, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, is requesting that the City hold a public hearing so that the Mayor may sign a public approval certificate for Pax Station Apartments LLC to receive bond proceeds to (a) finance the costs of the acquisition, construction and/or equipping of an approximately 272-unit multifamily housing rental development located on an approximately 0.666 acre site at 203 West Paxton Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. The City will not issue the bonds or assume any financial liability; rather, the bonds will be issued by the Public Finance Authority, a commission organized under and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 66.0301, 66.0303 and 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes in one or more series, in an amount not to exceed $75,000,000. The public hearing for this types of bonds is required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The request for the public hearing is a requirement of private activity bonds and is a procedural action that must be taken by the developer/issuer to comply with IRS regulations. A TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) hearing allows interested members of the public to express their views regarding the issuance of the bonds for a certain project. Project Overview The Paxton Project is a proposed 272-unit workforce housing development located at 203 West Paxton Avenue in the Ballpark District of Salt Lake City. The project will rise seven stories above grade with two levels of parking, and will deliver a modern, transit-oriented community adjacent to the Ballpark TRAX Station. The project’s unit mix consists of approximately 67% studio units and 33% one-bedroom units. This design responds directly to strong market demand for smaller, efficient, and affordable apartments close to downtown and major transit lines. Workforce Housing Commitment The Paxton Project will operate under a workforce housing deed restriction, ensuring that 40% of units are affordable to households earning up to 60% of Area Median Income (AMI). Additionally, we are deed-restricted to have at least 50% of the units affordable to no more than 80% of AMI. This will help the project serve a broad cross-section of Salt Lake City ’s workforce. Community Benefits •Transit-Oriented Development (TOD): The site is within walking distance of the Ballpark TRAX station (Red, Green, and Blue lines), connecting residents directly to downtown Salt Lake City, the University of Utah, Salt Lake International Airport, and employment centers throughout the valley.•Revitalization of the Ballpark District: The project replaces a current tow yard with a high-quality, high-density residential building. This aligns with the City ’s vision for redevelopment and higher-density housing along transit corridors.•Modern, Affordable Housing Supply: Much of Salt Lake City’s rental housing stock is 40–50 years old. The Paxton will provide modern, efficient, Class-A apartments with amenities such as a rooftop terrace, fitness center, bike repair and storage, automated package delivery, and pedestrian-friendly plazas.•Sustainability & Accessibility: Features include EV charging stations, bike-friendly design, and walkable access to shopping, services, and employment.•Environmental Cleanup: this site was contaminated having been a former tow yard and has gone through an extensive cleanup process with the State DEQ. •Neighborhood Connections: the project is also creating a new mid-block connection that was lost decades ago by continuing the alley/pedestrian pathway that splits the block in half between Paxton Avenue and Lucy Avenue.Market Conditions Salt Lake City’s rental market remains strong, with vacancy rates around 5.6% and high demand for urban apartments. Recent absorption trends confirm that well-located projects like Paxton can lease up quickly at sustainable rental levels. Importantly, this project contributes to easing housing shortages while maintaining long-term financial feasibility. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process The TEFRA hearing allows for public comment. This page has intentionally been left blank NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), on [________], October [__], 2025, at [____] [a.m.][p.m.], or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, both by electronic means and in person, in the City Council Chamber, City Hall, 451 South State Street, Room 315, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111, regarding the proposed issuance by the Public Finance Authority (the “Issuer”), a commission organized under and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 66.0301, 66.0303 and 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes, as amended, of its revenue notes, bonds or other obligations in one or more series from time to time pursuant to a plan of financing (the “Bonds”), in an amount not to exceed $75,000,000. The public hearing is required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The following information has been provided by the Borrower (as defined below) for this Notice: The Bonds are expected to be delivered pursuant to Section 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes, as amended. The proceeds from the delivery of the Bonds will be loaned to Pax Station Apartments LLC, a Utah limited liability company (the “Borrower”), the sole member of which is Patriot Services Group, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, and used to (a) finance the costs of the acquisition, construction and/or equipping of an approximately 272-unit multifamily housing rental development located on an approximately 0.666 acre site at 203 West Paxton Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 (the “Facilities”), (ii) fund certain reserves as may be required, (iii) finance capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any, and (iv) finance costs of issuance of the Bonds (collectively, the “Project”). On the date of delivery of the Bonds, the Facilities will be initially owned and operated by the Borrower. The Bonds will be delivered as “qualified 501(c)(3) bonds” under Section 145 of the Code. The Bonds will be special limited obligations of the Issuer payable solely from the loan repayments to be made by the Borrower to the Issuer, and certain funds and accounts established by the trust indenture for the Bonds. The Bonds will not be an obligation in any way of the State of Utah (“Utah”) or the City, within the meaning of any Utah Constitutional provision or statutory limitation. At the time and place set for the public hearing, interested persons will be given a reasonable opportunity to express their views, both in person in Room 315 of the City Hall or online through Zoom, on the merits of the Project, its location, the plan of financing, the delivery of the Bonds or related matters. For more information, including registration and Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/agendas. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, (801) 535- 7600, or relay service 711. Date of Notice: September [__], 2025 This page has intentionally been left blank PUBLIC APPROVAL CERTIFICATE with respect to the tax-exempt loan evidenced by $[__________] PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS (PAX STATION APARTMENTS) SERIES 2025 WHEREAS, the purpose of this approval certificate is to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), in order to qualify the interest on the above-captioned bonds (the “Bonds”) for exclusion from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Public Finance Authority (the “Authority”) has informed me that the proceeds of the loan evidenced by the Bonds made by the Authority are being used to fund a loan to Pax Station Apartments LLC, a Utah limited liability company (the “Borrower”), the sole member of which is Patriot Services Group, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation and an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $75,000,000 for the purpose of (a) financing the costs of the acquisition, construction and equipping of an approximately 272-unit multifamily housing rental development located on an approximately 0.666 acre site at 203 West Paxton Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101(the “Facilities”), (ii) funding certain reserves as may be required, (iii) funding capitalized interest on the Bonds, if any, and (iv) financing costs of issuance of the Bonds (collectively the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued as “qualified 501(c)(3) bonds” under Section 145 of the Code; and WHEREAS, I have been informed that the Facilities will be owned and operated by the Borrower; and WHEREAS, after reasonable public notice was given by publication of notice in the Salt Lake Tribune on September [__], 2025 (the “Public Notice”), a public hearing (the “Public Hearing”) was convened at [____] [a.m.][p.m.] on [_______], October [__], 2025, in the City and County Building, City Hall, 451 South State Street, Room 315, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. No one participated, and no comments were received with respect to the delivery of the Bonds. The hearing was thereupon closed; and WHEREAS, I have been informed that Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes provides that the Authority may not issue bonds to finance a capital improvement project unless the governing body, or the highest ranking executive or administrator of a political subdivision within whose boundaries the Project is to be located has approved the financing of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested that Salt Lake City approve the financing of the Project and the delivery of the Bonds in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 4 of the Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the Public Finance 2 4905-5362-1271, v. 2 Authority, dated September 28, 2010 (the “Joint Exercise Agreement”), and Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT: (1) As Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), I am the chief elected officer of the City elected at-large by popular vote of residents of the City; and (2) The purpose for which the Bonds are delivered is as set forth in the Public Notice and, based on the minutes of the Public Hearing, no objections were raised at the Public Hearing with respect to the delivery of the Bonds or the financing of such Project; and (3) I understand that this Public Approval Certificate will be used for the purpose of qualifying the interest on the Bonds for exclusion from the gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Code. In no event shall the City be liable for such Bonds, nor shall the Bonds constitute a debt of the City. Neither the undersigned nor the City makes any representation, warranty or covenant of the legal sufficiency of the matters set forth herein, the economic, financial or engineering viability of the Project, whether the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, or the application of any state, federal or local laws or regulations to the Bonds or the Project; and (4) I hereby approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for financing the Project. This Public Approval Certificate constitutes approval of the delivery of the Bonds by Salt Lake City which is one of the governmental units having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes and Section 4 of the Joint Exercise Agreement. This approval is intended to comply with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes; provided, however, that this approval is neither intended to nor shall it constitute an approval by the City of the Facilities or the Project for any other purpose, and provided further that this approval is purely ministerial in nature and the Mayor does not purport to have any knowledge of the laws of the State of Wisconsin or the Joint Exercise Agreement. Because this Public Approval Certificate is not intended to constitute an approval by the City of the Facilities or the Project for any purpose other than compliance with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code and Section 66.0304(11)(a) of the Wisconsin Statutes, this Public Approval Certificate expressly does not constitute City approval of any permit applications, plans, designs, or other aspects of the planning and construction processes related to the Project. Consequently, approval of any such applications, plans, designs, or other aspects of the planning and construction processes related to Project must be pursued through the City’s designated processes. 2 Signed this ___ day of _________, 2025. ___________________________________ Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah This page has intentionally been left blank Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Allison Rowland, Senior Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: RESOLUTION: SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO SALT LAKE CITY’S HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MOTION 1 – ADOPT RESOLUTION I move that the Council adopt the resolution adopting a Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to reallocate a portion of one-time HUD HOME-ARP funding. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT RESOLUTION I move that the Council not adopt the resolution and move on to the next item. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/19/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/20/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Royall, Heather E-mail heather.royall@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/20/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/20/2025 Subject: Substantial Amendment to Salt Lake City’s HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Additional Staff Contact: Tony Milner, tony.milner@slc.gov Dennis Rutledge, dennis.rutledge@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Tony Milner, tony.milner@slc.gov Heather Royall, heather.royall@slc.gov Dennis Rutledge, dennis.rutledge@slc.gov Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Schedule a work session, set the date for the required public hearing, and ultimately approve the included Resolution adopting the Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process A 30-day minimum public comment period will begin following the acceptance of this transmittal by the City Council, specifically for the above-mentioned HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Substantial Amendment components. The public comment period will be posted in English and Spanish. At a minimum, the public comment period will be noticed through the following channels: a newspaper of general circulation, Housing Stability’s comprehensive contact mailing/email list, Housing Stability’s website, the State’s Public Notice website, social media platforms, and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. At least one public hearing, to be scheduled at the City Council’s discretion, will also be held during the 30-day minimum public comment period. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On April 28, 2021, Salt Lake City was notified of a one-time supplemental allocation of $3,533,195 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) funds, authorized under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. These funds, provided through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), are designated for non-congregate shelter, affordable housing development, tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA), and supportive services to benefit individuals who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, fleeing domestic violence, or at high risk of housing instability. This allocation is separate from the City’s annual HOME entitlement funding. All HOME-ARP funds must be expended by September 30, 2030. In accordance with HUD guidelines, the Housing Stability Division conducted a comprehensive consultation and public participation process to develop a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. A Substantial Amendment to the 2021–2022 Annual Action Plan was adopted on March 21, 2023, to incorporate the Allocation Plan and formally allocate the HOME-ARP funds. The adopted plan funded activities under three categories: TBRA, Development of Affordable Rental Housing, and Administration and Planning. Proposed Amendment A Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan is now proposed to support case management services for TBRA programs. Although case management is a critical component of effective rental assistance delivery, it is not an eligible expense under the HOME-ARP TBRA category. Agencies awarded HOME-ARP TBRA funds are unable to absorb these costs in their entirety through other sources. To address this, Housing Stability proposes a budget-neutral reallocation of $230,306.00 from the TBRA category to the Supportive Services category, where case management is an allowable use. This adjustment does not alter the agencies awarded, the total amount awarded to those agencies, or other components of the Allocation Plan, but enables essential case management services to be provided in coordination with rental assistance. Available Funds The table below reflects the proposed changes to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan: Proposed Use of HOME-ARP Funding Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $230,306.00 1,501,608.00 Total HOME ARP Allocation Process and Timeline To formally authorize this change, the City must adopt a Substantial Amendment to the HOME- ARP Allocation Plan and submit it to HUD for approval. The anticipated process is as follows: Current: • Submission of this transmittal initiates City Council review. • Upon transmittal, Housing Stability will begin the required 30-day public comment period, which includes public notices and outreach. Next Steps: • City Council holds a public hearing within the public comment period. • Following the hearing, the City Council considers and adopts a resolution approving the Substantial Amendment (see Exhibit 2: Resolution). Revisions may be made based on feedback from the Council or the public. • Upon adoption, Housing Stability will submit the amendment to HUD for final review and approval. PUBLIC PROCESS: A 30-day minimum public comment period will begin following the acceptance of this transmittal by the City Council, specifically for the above-mentioned HOME- ARP Allocation Plan Substantial Amendment components. The public comment period will be posted in English and Spanish. At a minimum, the public comment period will be noticed through the following channels: a newspaper of general circulation, Housing Stability’s comprehensive contact mailing/email list, Housing Stability’s website, the State’s Public Notice website, social media platforms, and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. At least one public hearing, to be scheduled at the City Council’s discretion, will also be held during the 30-day minimum public comment period. EXHIBITS: 1) Adopted HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 2) Resolution This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO, VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Consultation ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................... 14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis ...................................................................................................... 16 HOME-ARP Activities .............................................................................................................................. 25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals ................................................................................................. 27 Preferences ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Referral Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project ............................................................... 32 3 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive, please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to “the ARP” mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 4 Consultation In accordance with Section V.A of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME-ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJ must consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans’ groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family’s homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including, but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans’ groups, individuals with disabilities, persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity’s feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 5 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs – especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA, Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: Agency/Org consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Services, Inc. Veterans’ Group, Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Individual or Family. Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human 6 Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can Workforce Services Services for Low Income Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons Center Domestic Violence Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness – Individual and Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. 7 for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health Inc. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities. Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking Salt Lake – Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: The greatest gap to housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited Office of Homeless Services Homeless Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 8 Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Action Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 9 of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Veterans' Group, Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Treatment, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population - over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. 10 Center Organization, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Center Services, Human Trafficking Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need Center Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and Association - DBA The Haven Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal 11 Violence Coalition Services, Human Trafficking Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. Habitat for Humanity Buyer Assistance, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness seeking stable housing. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. 12 SLC Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Civil Rights Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gap in housing/shelter is tenant choice housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 13 Health and Human Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to find information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management Housing Authority Domestic and Other Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and 14 Authority DBA Housing Connect Domestic and Other Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Years of Age. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake County CoC - Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Government Entity, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homeless - Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter - 450+ overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow 15 its adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive, and • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ must follow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient (LEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 5/22/2022 • Public comment period: start date - 5/22/2022 end date - 6/8/2022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 6/1/2022 • Date(s) of public notice: 2/1/2023 • Public comment period: start date - 2/12/2023 end date - 3/21/2023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 2/21/2023 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another from February 12, 2023 to March 21, 2023. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The public hearing on February 21, 2023, had three residents make comments. A summary of their comments is included at an attachment to this plan. Three additional comments were provided by email during the second public comment period. Those comments are also included. The draft Allocation Plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability’s webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. 16 Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022 and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. Three comments were made during the public hearing on February 21, 2023. One comment was in support of the draft plan. Another comment stated that additional accountability was necessary for homeless services and the last made suggestions related to emergency shelter operations. All comments were accepted and have been included with this plan. Three comments were sent via email during the public comment period. One was in support of the draft plan. The other two stated that there was a need for supportive services in addition to TBRA and suggested that HOME ARP funds be allowed to be utilized throughout Salt Lake County due to the high rental costs in Salt Lake City. All comments were accepted and have been included with the plan. Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. 17 Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Family Adults Only Vets Family HH (at least 1 HH (w/o of DV Beds Units Beds Units* Beds Beds Units Beds Units 483 47 862 0 226 60 136 Avail. 80 Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Permanent 0 0 0 0 634 1,055 73 329 0 268 7 26 Current Gap 1,230 Not Avail. 1,069 Not Avail. Data Source: CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (PIT) (2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. 18 Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table # of Units # of Households # of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At-Risk of 4,745 at 50% AMI (At-Risk of 14,850 or more severe housing problems (At-Risk of 6,555 or more severe housing 2,380 Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30% AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30% AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless, residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39% while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 19 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121% between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition, people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City’s cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30% AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. 20 Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) calls, case-managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50% AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower-income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls, requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re-housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. 21 Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging Supportive services dispersed location of shelters and… Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing Emergency shelter (beds) Online/hotline housing assistance Non-congregate shelters Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. 22 Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations More staffing Domestic abuse/violence Supportive services for homelessness Housing support/assistance Disabilities Mental health/substance abuse services Medical 23 Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50% AMI are housing cost burdened, paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50% AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30% AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.2.ii.G of the HOME-ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of “other populations” that are “At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,” as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. 24 Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Other (please specify) Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Stalking, or Human Trafficking) Preferred use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units Supportive Services Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Creation of Affordable Rental Housing 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Identify priority needs for qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the graph below, the qualifying population with the highest unmet need is homeless individual or family at 54.04%. Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should be expanded to qualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. 25 Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing – 20% • Senior housing – 13% • Long-term housing – 13% • Supportive housing – 6% • Non-congregate housing – 6% • Sustainable housing – 6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJ’s shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014-2018 CHAS, U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree Agree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 26 HOME-ARP Activities Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight, but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits. 27 Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $ 0 Total HOME ARP Allocation Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME-ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved $176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of $1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME-ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of $1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. 28 This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME-ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market, high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. 29 Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ’s priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe, which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development, home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME-ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 30 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP (i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a PJ-adopted preference to be selected for HOME-ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify for a preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME-ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualify for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: “Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term “Prioritization” to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section II.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice.” If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method of prioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME-ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME-ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and 31 civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJ fails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME-ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME-ARP allocation plan. For HOME-ARP rental housing projects, Section VI.B.20.a.iii of the HOME-ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30% AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30% AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30% AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30% AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. 32 Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE) process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME-ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME-ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE (or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a project or activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP project or activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C.2.ii) or to use only a project/activity waiting list (as provided in Section IV.C.2.iii) if: 1. the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJ for the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations where a project’s geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic area(s) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g., prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second, followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc.) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME-ARP projects and activities. PJ’s may use multiple referral methods in its HOME-ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis, unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System (UHMIS), Paystubs/ Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification (SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. 33 If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry (CE) process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a project or activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another referral method for a project or activity, describe any method of prioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD’s Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJ may not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations, participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(1)(iv). A PJ must describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VI.B.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. 34 Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV.A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME-ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ’s HOME-ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable EXHIBIT: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7, 2023, through March 21, 2023, with a second Public Hearing on February 21, 2023. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State’s Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor’s Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. Council Public Hearing on HOME ARP Draft Allocation Plan February 21, 2023 The following is a summary of public comments made during the Salt Lake City Council’s Public Hearing to discuss the draft allocation plan. Commentor: Damon Talbot Comments made via Webex. Summary of Comments: My name is Damon Talbot, and I am here representing the Alliance House. I wanted to offer our support for the amounts proposed in the plan. We look forward to applying for some of the funding for a new housing facility for our agency. I believe that housing is incredibly important in Salt Lake City, but especially for those with additional circumstances besides just their homelessness. It is very valuable for this money to come to the city and to use it for both housing and rental assistance. We are completely in support of the motion. Commentor: Bernie Hart Comments made in person. Summary of Comments: I think we are going to make an effort to come as often as we can in support of the people who will be the focus of the funding for housing and services for the homeless in the city. There is an element in all of these plans that is totally lacking. It is an element that I think is essential in finding programs that help the homeless, people that are addicted and people dealing with mental health issues. In my opinion we are doing the same thing over and over and not reducing the number of homeless in Salt Lake City or the Country. The one thing that is absent from the whole agenda is accountability. When somebody gets funding, there should be some assurance that they are actually transitioning people out of homelessness. I really do not know how many times, I am going to have to come here and say that before somebody starts holding somebody accountable for the tax dollars we are spending to help people. I think I will start counting. Commentor: Christopher Dixon Comments made in person. Summary of Comments: My name is Christopher Dixon. I want to add a suggestion. It was about six months ago, about the abandoned school for a shelter proposal. I understand that could work, but I am suggesting that for the homeless shelter rules, let the homeless run it. Have them run it themselves. If they earn it with you guys let them show that they can do what they do. I know that Salt Lake loves the homeless, but what drives you crazy is the trash. What I suggest is let them run it and do their own rules instead of the shelter rules that stresses them out. Let them have a community of themselves. I would give them a chance to let them earn it. They would definitely earn it. I know they would. That way they can transition into housing. That’s all I want to say. From:Laurie Hopkins To:Hase, Dillon; Council Comments Subject:(EXTERNAL) Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan - Shelter the Homeless Comments Date:Friday, March 3, 2023 2:35:38 PM Dear SLC Leadership and Staff, As Executive Director of Shelter the Homeless, I am submitting input on the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation plan, which outlines the use of these one-time funds to assist those experiencing homelessness in our community. Shelter the Homeless (STH) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to serving individuals experiencing homelessness and working with partners to develop safe facilities and expand solutions to prevent and end homelessness in Utah. STH is a leading provider of emergency shelter facilities in Salt Lake County, with the Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) opening in 2019. STH provides 1,000 beds, or 72% of the capacity in the system, serving more than 5,000 individuals annually. STH contracts with third-party nonprofit providers to manage services in the facilities. The HRCs are positioned to provide access to emergency shelter and the supportive services a client needs to get back on their feet and move toward stable, affordable housing. We support the allocation of $1,501,608 to Tenant-based Rental Assistance to reduce the number of people who fall into homelessness and keep people in their homes, and $1,501,608 to Development of Affordable Rental Housing by investing deeply into affordable housing and support services so that we can reduce emergency and crisis needs. The length of stay in shelter has been increasing in our community for a variety of factors, including the disruptions from the pandemic, the need in our community for increased deeply affordable housing units since our vacancy rate is less than 2%, and general economic conditions such as mounting inflation, a housing shortage and high home prices. In addition, STH supports $529,979 to Administration and Planning, so there are resources for appropriate determination of the gaps in our continuum of care and the most strategic use of funds. On behalf of STH board and staff, we support the Salt Lake City allocation plan as the most strategic and appropriate use of funds. Thank you. Laurie Hopkins Executive Director Shelter the Homeless 242 Paramount Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 801-359-0698 office 435-655-5368 mobile Utah Community Action 1307 South 900 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 (801) 359-2444 www.utahca.org March 14, 2023 Salt Lake City Council PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476 Dear Salt Lake City Council, Utah Community Action (UCA) would like to express their appreciation and support for the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. We are excited that there will be additional funding available for residents facing a housing emergen- cy. This is especially important at a time when inflation and housing costs outpacing the earnings of the families in our community. UCA has administered the HOME program for over 15 years and has received annual funding from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County. Additionally, UCA has administered over $40 million in Covid rental assistance to clients residing in Salt Lake County over the past three years. From our experience, we have seen that it is imperative to provide clients with holistic case management to ensure they are successful and become self-reliant. Our clients are facing a multi- tude of issues that requires in-depth case management, which connects clients to resources that can adequately ad- dress their needs. We request that that the Salt Lake City Council reconsider and allocate a portion of this this funding for supportive services, such as case management, so clients are able to achieve long-term success. Without such flexibility in fund- ing, providers would be limited to only offering rental payments to clients. Moreover, HOME-ARP funding allows for supportive services and has other flexibility that could enhance the case management process. UCA also requests that the Salt Lake City Council consider expanding the boundaries of the HOME-ARP TBRA funds into Salt Lake County. We are seeing clients residing in Salt Lake City struggle to keep up with rent increases and are being priced out of the Salt Lake City rental market; most of these clients are moving South or West into Salt Lake County. By expanding the geographic scope of this funding, the Salt Lake City Council can ensure that clients receiving assistance are housed in units that meet their needs. UCA sincerely appreciates the work of the Salt Lake City Council and the Mayor's Office to address the housing crisis within our community. We hope that these suggestions will assist in enhancing the effectiveness of the HOME-ARP program. Sincerely, Sahil Oberoi Chief Operating Officer Jennifer Godfrey Chief Executive Officer PRESIDENT Lee A. Carter PRESIDENT-ELECT Louie Cononelos SECRETARY C.A. Bud Bailey TREASURER Steve Eliason PAST PRESIDENT Julie H. Kilgore EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Larry Barusch Kamie F. Brown Troy R. Christensen Paul Craig Steve Crane Matthew Durham Karen Gilmore Scott C. Godderidge Laurie Hofmann Richard Humpherys Brenda Koga Sara Kurrus Charlie Lansche Jannah J. Hurn Mather Bonnie Salazar Mifsud Matthew J. Moran Michael A. Pazzi Margrit Schneider Kerry Steadman Merlin S. Taylor Steven R. Taylor Hilea C. Walker Bret Yeargin COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD Pamela J. Atkinson, Chair Spencer P. Eccles Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Spencer Kirk Evelyn Lee Robert H. Perry Amanda P. Simmons TEL Administration: 801.359.4142 TEL Development & PR: 801.355.1433 FAX: 801.359.4178 w w w. t h e ro a dh o me .or g 210 S. Rio Grande Street Salt Lake City, UT 84101 www.theroadhome.org PRESIDENT H. Blaine Walker PRESIDENT-ELECT Chris Acton VICE PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Jennifer A. Johnson TREASURER Greg M. Johnson PAST PRESIDENT Bob Allen EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dustin Allen Kirk Benson H. David Burton Peter Chamberlain Twinkle Chisholm Dain Craig Steve Eliason – Emeritus Chip Everest – Emeritus Dell Loy Hansen Joseph Horton - Emeritus David Hilton Jace P. Johnson Steve Kogianes Leslie Motley Joyce Pell Pauline Ploquin Doug Smith Tony Smith Ron Sperry Sarah Starkey Susan Taggart Diane Terry PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Christena Huntsman Durham TREASURER Keb Brady PAST PRESIDENT Greg M. Johnson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Michelle C. Flynn BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chris Acton Dustin Allen Peter Chamberlain Angie Cook Connie Crosby Steve Eliason – Emeritus Rick Foster Brian Garrett Evan Goldstein Rhonda Greenwood Jessica Guynn Sue Mark Lunde Shawn Newell - Emeritus Aspen Perry Pauline Ploquin Gloria Salazar Chris Sotiriou Charles Stormont Nikki Walker James Washington Emily Wegener 1415 S Main St Salt Lake City, UT 84115 theROAD HOMERefuge. Resources. Relief. March 10, 2023 Salt Lake City Council PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476 Dear Salt Lake City Council, The Road Home would like to express their appreciation and support for the Salt Lake city HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. We understand the immense amount of work it takes to compile a comprehensive assessment of needs throughout the community and are grateful to Salt Lake City's Housing STability Division for their thorough review. The Road Home is excited to see that development of affordable rental housing has been prioritized and recommend for funding. We continue to see a substantial number of individuals enter homelessness due to the continuously increasing rental rates in our community. The development of affordable rental housing for low- and very low-income families is critical to our community's efforts in making homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. As a current HOME recipient of Salt Lake City, The Road Home is aware of the substantial need in our community for additional tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA). As such, we are thrilled to see that TBRA is being prioritized by Salt Lake City. The Road Home respectfully requests that Salt Lake City Council consider allocating a portion of the available funds to supportive services to better support the deployment and success of the TBRA programs operated by providers in the community. The goal of rapid re-housing programs is to help participants obtain and maintain housing stability. To facilitate this, The Road Home's case management teams provide comprehensive supportive services, developing housing stability plans with households and connecting them to additional resources in the community that will support their future stability. Research shows that case management provided to persons experiencing homelessness can improve housing stability, reduce substance use, and remove employment barriers. Studies have shown that individuals receiving case management are likely to reduce emergency room visits, reduce psychiatric symptoms, and increase engagement in medical and non-medical services. Traditional HOME funds cannot be used for supportive services. The Road Home utilizes private donations and other flexible grants to support the case management component of our current HOME awards to ensure that participants have access to this critical service. PRESIDENT Lee A. Carter PRESIDENT-ELECT Louie Cononelos SECRETARY C.A. Bud Bailey TREASURER Steve Eliason PAST PRESIDENT Julie H. Kilgore EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Larry Barusch Kamie F. Brown Troy R. Christensen Paul Craig Steve Crane Matthew Durham Karen Gilmore Scott C. Godderidge Laurie Hofmann Richard Humpherys Brenda Koga Sara Kurrus Charlie Lansche Jannah J. Hurn Mather Bonnie Salazar Mifsud Matthew J. Moran Michael A. Pazzi Margrit Schneider Kerry Steadman Merlin S. Taylor Steven R. Taylor Hilea C. Walker Bret Yeargin COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD Pamela J. Atkinson, Chair Spencer P. Eccles Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Spencer Kirk Evelyn Lee Robert H. Perry Amanda P. Simmons TEL Administration: 801.359.4142 TEL Development & PR: 801.355.1433 FAX: 801.359.4178 w w w. t h e ro a dh o me .or g 210 S. Rio Grande Street Salt Lake City, UT 84101 www.theroadhome.org PRESIDENT H. Blaine Walker PRESIDENT-ELECT Chris Acton VICE PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Jennifer A. Johnson TREASURER Greg M. Johnson PAST PRESIDENT Bob Allen EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dustin Allen Kirk Benson H. David Burton Peter Chamberlain Twinkle Chisholm Dain Craig Steve Eliason – Emeritus Chip Everest – Emeritus Dell Loy Hansen Joseph Horton - Emeritus David Hilton Jace P. Johnson Steve Kogianes Leslie Motley Joyce Pell Pauline Ploquin Doug Smith Tony Smith Ron Sperry Sarah Starkey Susan Taggart Diane Terry PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Christena Huntsman Durham TREASURER Keb Brady PAST PRESIDENT Greg M. Johnson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Michelle C. Flynn BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chris Acton Dustin Allen Peter Chamberlain Angie Cook Connie Crosby Steve Eliason – Emeritus Rick Foster Brian Garrett Evan Goldstein Rhonda Greenwood Jessica Guynn Sue Mark Lunde Shawn Newell - Emeritus Aspen Perry Pauline Ploquin Gloria Salazar Chris Sotiriou Charles Stormont Nikki Walker James Washington Emily Wegener 1415 S Main St Salt Lake City, UT 84115 theROAD HOMERefuge. Resources. Relief. As HOME-ARP allows more flexibility than traditional HOME and can directly support the case management services, we are requesting that Salt Lake City Council reconsider allocating funds to the Supportive Services line to support case management for TBRA programs. The Road Home is also requesting that Salt Lake City Council and the Housing Stability Division consider allowing service providers who administer HOME-ARP TBRA to be allowed to use the assistance outside of Salt Lake City proper boundaries. Current TBRA recipient households frequently struggle to find housing located within Salt Lake City's boundaries, as Salt Lake City's housing stock is substantially more expensive than neighboring communities. Allowing both HOME TBRA and HOME-ARP TBRA funds to be used outside of Salt Lake City proper would better support housing stability for households exiting homelessness, as they would be more likely to find lower cost housing and reduce their rent burden. This is eligible per the HOME Code of Federal Regulations at 24 CFR 92(d). The Road Home appreciates the dedication of Salt Lake City Council, Mayor Mendenhall, and staff in their efforts to end homelessness within our community. We look forward to working with you on these efforts. Sincerely, Michelle Flynn Executive Director This page has intentionally been left blank 1 RESOLUTION NO.________ OF 2025 A Resolution adopting a Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to reallocate a portion of one-time HUD HOME-ARP funding WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021 funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Home Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) in the amount of $3,533,195 under program year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 14 of 2021 adopted on April 21, 2021, Salt Lake City Council approved an appropriations resolution adopting the funding for the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022, which included HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from HUD; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 8 of 2023 adopted on March 21, 2003, Salt Lake City Council adopted an amendment to the One-Year Action Plan for 2021-2022 to include HUD HOME-ARP funding and approve a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, to be incorporated into the 2021-2022 HUD Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the City would like to reallocate a portion of funds in the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan from Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) to Supportive Services, to allow for the inclusion of case management services directly related to TBRA; and WHEREAS, in order to reallocate said funds, the City is required to substantially amend the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the public notices, hearings, and other pre-submission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been completed by the City, including but not limited to the following: a public comment period open from __________, 2025 through __________, 2025, and a City Council public hearing held on ___________, 2025 to consider the proposed substantial amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of ___________, 2025 to adopt a substantial amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The Salt Lake City Council hereby adopts as a substantial amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan the Proposed Changes to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, to be incorporated into the 2021-2022 HUD Annual Action Plan. 2 2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to submit to HUD the substantial amendment described above, together with such additional information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ______________, 2025. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By _____________________________ CHAIR Approved as to form: ___/s/ Sara Montoya_______________ Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __August 13, 2025 ___________ Name: Sara Montoya ATTEST: _________________________________ City Recorder 3 EXHIBIT “A” Proposed Changes to the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 4 SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO, VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS 5 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Consultation ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................... 14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis ...................................................................................................... 16 HOME-ARP Activities .............................................................................................................................. 25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals ................................................................................................. 27 Preferences ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Referral Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project ............................................................... 32 6 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive, please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to “the ARP” mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 7 Consultation In accordance with Section V.A of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME-ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJ must consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans’ groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family’s homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including, but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans’ groups, individuals with disabilities, persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity’s feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 8 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs – especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA, Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: Agency/Org consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Services, Inc. Veterans’ Group, Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Individual or Family. Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly 9 Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can Workforce Services Services for Low Income Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons 10 Center Domestic Violence Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness – Individual and Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health Inc. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities. Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking Salt Lake – Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: The greatest gap to housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited 11 Office of Homeless Services Homeless Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Action Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. 12 Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Veterans' Group, Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Treatment, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. 13 SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population - over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. Center Organization, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Center Services, Human Trafficking Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need Center Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and 14 Association - DBA The Haven Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal Violence Coalition Services, Human Trafficking Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. 15 Habitat for Humanity Buyer Assistance, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness seeking stable housing. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. SLC Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Civil Rights Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gap in housing/shelter is tenant choice housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 16 Health and Human Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to find information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management Housing Authority Domestic and Other Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and 17 Authority DBA Housing Connect Domestic and Other Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Years of Age. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake County CoC - Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Government Entity, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homeless - Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter - 450+ overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation 18 plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must followits adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive, and • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ must follow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient (LEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 5/22/2022 • Public comment period: start date - 5/22/2022 end date - 6/8/2022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 6/1/2022 • Date(s) of public notice: 2/1/2023 • Public comment period: start date - 2/12/2023 end date - 3/21/2023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 2/21/2023 • Date(s) of public notice: XXX, 2025 • Public comment period: start date – XXX, 2025 end date – XXX, 2025 • Date(s) of public hearing: XXX, 2025 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another from February 12, 2023 to March 21, 2023. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The public hearing on February 21, 2023, had three residents make comments. A summary of their comments is included at an attachment to this plan. Three additional comments were provided by email during the second public comment 19 period. Those comments are also included. The draft Allocation Plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. A Substantial Amendment to Salt Lake City’s 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to recognize, accept, and allocate HOME-ARP funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was adopted on March 21, 2023, which allocated funds to three (3) specific HOME-ARP activities; Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), Development of Affordable Rental Housing, and Administration and Planning. Due to the technical differences in the uses of HOME and HOME-ARP funding and updated HUD guidance on TBRA funding under HOME-ARP, case management is not considered an eligible activity, even when directly related to TBRA. However, case management is an essential component of TBRA in many local programs, and some agencies awarded HOME-ARP funds cannot absorb these costs elsewhere. Housing Stability seeks to reallocate a portion of the HOME-ARP funds from the TBRA activity to the Supportive Services activity, which covers case management. This reallocation will not affect the agencies awarded or their total funding awards but will allow a portion of the funds to be used for case management alongside TBRA programs. Per the regulatory requirements outlined by HUD in 24 CFR 91.505 (b), HOME- ARP Eligible Activities in 24 CFR, and the City’s approved Citizen Participation Plan, Salt Lake City must request a Substantial Amendment to: • The 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan HOME-ARP Allocation Plan This amendment is required to authorize the reallocation of HOME-ARP funds from the TBRA activity to the Supportive Services activity. To formally change the category of uses for these funds, a Substantial Amendment to the City’s 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan HOME-ARP Allocation Plan needs to be adopted by the City Council and approved by HUD. In order to facilitate this substantial amendment, a public notice was posted to open a new public comment period and a new public hearing was held. Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability’s webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: 20 There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022 and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. Three comments were made during the public hearing on February 21, 2023. One comment was in support of the draft plan. Another comment stated that additional accountability was necessary for homeless services and the last made suggestions related to emergency shelter operations. All comments were accepted and have been included with this plan. Three comments were sent via email during the public comment period. One was in support of the draft plan. The other two stated that there was a need for supportive services in addition to TBRA and suggested that HOME ARP funds be allowed to be utilized throughout Salt Lake County due to the high rental costs in Salt Lake City. All comments were accepted and have been included with the plan. Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Family Adults Only Vets Family HH (at least 1 HH (w/o of DV Beds Units Beds Units* Beds Beds Units Beds Units 483 47 862 0 226 60 136 Avail. 80 Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Permanent 0 0 0 0 21 634 1,055 73 329 0 268 7 26 Current Gap 1,230 Not Avail. 1,069 Not Avail. Data Source: CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (PIT) (2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table # of Units # of Households # of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At-Risk of 4,745 at 50% AMI (At-Risk of 14,850 or more severe housing problems (At-Risk of 6,555 or more severe housing 2,380 Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30% AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30% AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. 22 Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless, residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39% while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121% between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition, people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders 23 represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City’s cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30% AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) calls, case- managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50% AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower- income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to 24 rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls, requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re- housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services 25 has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations More staffing Domestic abuse/violence Supportive services for homelessness Housing support/assistance Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging Supportive services dispersed location of shelters and… Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing 26 include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation 27 of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50% AMI are housing cost burdened, paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50% AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30% AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.2.ii.G of the HOME-ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of “other populations” that are “At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,” as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. Identify priority needs for qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the graph below, the qualifying population with the highest unmet need is homeless individual or family at 54.04%. 28 Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should be expanded to qualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Preferred use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units Supportive Services Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) 29 Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing – 20% • Senior housing – 13% • Long-term housing – 13% • Supportive housing – 6% • Non-congregate housing – 6% • Sustainable housing – 6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJ’s shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014- 2018 CHAS, U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. HOME-ARP Activities Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree Agree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 30 Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight, but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. 31 In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME- ARP limits. Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $ 0 Total HOME ARP Allocation Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME-ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved $176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of $1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed- income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families 32 with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME- ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of $ 1,271,302.00 $1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. In addition to TBRA funding, Salt Lake City completed a substantial amendment to allocate $230.306.00 in HOME-ARP funding to Supportive Services, in order to allow for the inclusion of case management services directly related to TBRA funding. Case management is an essential component of TBRA in many local programs, and some agencies awarded HOME-ARP funds cannot absorb these costs elsewhere. This reallocation did not affect the agencies awarded or their total funding awards but will allow a portion of the funds to be used for case management alongside TBRA programs. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations 33 state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME- ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market, high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ’s priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe, which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development, home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME- ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 34 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP (i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a PJ-adopted preference to be selected for HOME-ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify for a preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME-ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualify for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: “Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term “Prioritization” to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section II.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice.” If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method of prioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME-ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME-ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more 35 qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJ fails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME-ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME-ARP allocation plan. For HOME-ARP rental housing projects, Section VI.B.20.a.iii of the HOME-ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. 36 If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30% AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30% AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30% AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30% AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE) process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME-ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME-ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE (or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a project or activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP project or activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C.2.ii) or to use only a project/activity waiting list (as provided in Section IV.C.2.iii) if: 1. the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJ for the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations 37 where a project’s geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic area(s) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g., prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second, followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc.) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME-ARP projects and activities. PJ’s may use multiple referral methods in its HOME-ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis, unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System (UHMIS), Paystubs/ Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification (SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry (CE) process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a project or activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another 38 referral method for a project or activity, describe any method of prioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD’s Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJ may not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations, participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(1)(iv). A PJ must describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VI.B.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV.A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of 39 qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME-ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ’s HOME-ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable 40 EXHIBIT: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7, 2023, through March 21, 2023, with a second Public Hearing on February 21, 2023. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State’s Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor’s Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. This page has intentionally been left blank Item C2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Partial Street Vacation at 1101 West 400 South (PLNPCM2025-00178) MOTION 1 (adopt ordinance vacating 1100 West street segment, denying 400 South street segment) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance vacating the 1100 West street segment and denying vacating the 400 South street segment adjacent to the applicant’s property. MOTION 2 (adopt ordinance vacating both 1100 West and 400 South street segments) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance vacating both the 1100 West and 400 South street segments. MOTION 3 (reject ordinance vacating both 1100 West and 400 South street segments) I move that the Council reject the ordinance vacating both the 1100 West and 400 South street segments. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: Partial Street Vacation at 1101 West 400 South (PLNPCM2025-00178) PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE Three people spoke at the October 7, 2025 public hearing expressing support for the proposed street closure. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting. As a reminder, the Administration expressed concerns with vacating the 400 South Street segment. These include the resulting inconsistent right-of-way width which would be 5 feet narrower than the rest of the corridor. Another concern is potentially limiting options if the 400 South Viaduct Trail is extended. Options listed on the motion sheet include: Adopting an ordinance vacating both the 400 South and 1100 West street segments. Adopting an ordinance vacating the 1100 West street segment and rejecting the 400 South street segment. Rejecting the ordinance vacating both street segments. The following information was provided for previous meetings. It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE During the September 2, 2025 briefing Council Members discussed an inconsistent width on 400 South if the proposal is approved by the Council, and that any vacated property would be sold at market value. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Item Schedule: Page | 2 The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate (or relinquish ownership of) a portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the petitioner’s property on the southwest corner of 1100 West and 400 South. The property requested to be vacated is approximately 5 feet wide and between the property line and sidewalk along the two street facing sides of the parcel. It would not impact pedestrian use of the sidewalk. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted 7:2 to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested right-of-way vacation along 1100 West and a recommendation to deny the portion along 400 South. Commissioners who voted against the motion did not state their reasons for objecting to it. Aerial image of the subject property. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed partial street closure, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTION Page | 3 2. The Council may wish to request more information from Engineering and Transportation about why they recommended denying the application 3. The Council may wish to ask what the impact would be if the 1100 West portion was vacated and not the 400 South section, as recommended by Transportation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 400 South (Poplar Grove Boulevard) is an arterial street with high traffic volume. The street is approximately 106 feet wide between the property lines of the subject property and Franklin Elementary, which is directly across the street. The street consists of traffic lanes in both directions, bike lanes, sidewalks, curb and gutter. 1100 West is a local street with low traffic volume and dead ends at a gate to the Neighborhood House Riverside Adult Day Center. The street is approximately 66 feet wide between property lines and includes curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides. The applicant’s property is the only one on their side of this section of 1100 West. The applicant requested a variance in 2024 to reduce setback standards to allow more buildable space. The Appeals Hearing Officer determined that the strict variance standards were not met and denied the request. Street vacations are processed like alley vacations following the standards found in Salt Lake City Code Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City Owned Alleys. At least one of the following policy considerations must be met: A. Lack of Use B. Public Safety C. Urban Design D. Community Purpose Planning staff found the lack of use consideration is applicable, noting that the 1100 West portion has been used for many years as private yard space with obstructions that block its use as a right-of-way. Planning stated the other policy considerations are not applicable. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified four key considerations during analysis of this proposal which are found on pages 5-7 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals & Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning reviewed the proposed partial street vacation and how it aligns with the following City plans: Westside Master Plan (2014) Salt Lake City Urban Design Element (1990) Major Street Plan (2018) It is Planning staff’s opinion that the proposed street vacation neither supports nor violates policies of goals of the Westside Master Plan. They found selling the property does not have a stated public benefit as called for in the Urban Design Element, though the City would benefit financially from sale of the land. Finally, Planning determined that because the land is between the public sidewalk and private property, vacating the property would not impact the stated purpose of arterial streets found in the Major Street Plan. Page | 4 Consideration 2 – Utah State Code Section 10-9a-609.5 of Utah State Code grants power to cities to vacate streets upon the request of the governing body or a property owner: 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (3) If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a-208 and determine whether: (a) good cause exists for the vacation; and (b) the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. Consideration 3 – Salt Lake City Ordinance As discussed above, street vacations are processed like alley vacations following the standards found in Salt Lake City Code Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City Owned Alleys. Consideration 4 – Department Review Comments The City Transportation and Engineering Divisions expressed concerns with the requested partial street vacation. Transportation recommended denial of the vacation along 400 South citing the need for a consistent right-of-way for potential improvements including widening the street and possible extension of the 400 South trail. However, they did not object to the 1100 West vacation. Engineering did not support reducing the right-of-way and recommended retaining consistent width throughout the street. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY February 25, 2025 – Application for street vacation was received by Planning Division. March 10, 2025 – Petition assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner. March 18, 2025 – o Notice was sent to the Poplar Grove Community Council informing them of the petition. The 45- day input and comment period began. o Early notification was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the applicant’s property. May 2, 2025 – The 45-day public comment period for recognized organizations ended. May 16, 2025 – Public hearing notice signs posted on the property. May 28, 2025 – The Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the right-of-way portion adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation to deny the requested right-of-way portion adjacent to 400 South. June 25, 2025 – Planning staff requested ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. July 28, 2025 – Ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office. August 6, 2025 – Transmitted to City Council Office. STREET CLOSURE PROCESS Page | 6 The street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference. 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (1)In lieu of vacating some or all of a public street through a plat or amended plat in accordance with Sections 10-9a-603 through 10-9a-609, a legislative body may approve a petition to vacate a public street in accordance with this section. (2)A petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement shall include: (a)the name and address of each owner of record of land that is: (i)adjacent to the public street or municipal utility easement between the two nearest public street intersections; or (ii)accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public street or municipal utility easement; (b)proof of written notice to operators of utilities and culinary water or sanitary sewer facilities located within the bounds of the public street or municipal utility easement sought to be vacated; and (c)the signature of each owner under Subsection (2)(a) who consents to the vacation. (3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a- 208 and determine whether: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. (4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. (5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land is located: (a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or (b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and (ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated. (6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that has been dedicated to public use: (a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public street or municipal utility easement; and (b)may not be construed to impair: (i)any right-of-way or easement of any parcel or lot owner; (ii)the rights of any public utility; or (iii)the rights of a culinary water authority or sanitary sewer authority. (7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a process to vacate some or all of a public street. (b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a): (i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing; Page | 7 (ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent: (A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27; (B)the easement is included within the public street; and (C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and (iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street through a recorded plat or amended plat. (8)A legislative body may not approve a petition to vacate a public street under this section unless the vacation identifies and preserves any easements owned by a culinary water authority and sanitary sewer authority for existing facilities located within the public street. Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council // September 2, 2025 PLNPCM2025-00178 PARTIAL STREET VACATION 1101 W 400 S Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SUBJECT PROPERTY Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning BACKGROUND & REQUEST •Existing home on property is over 100 years old and currently vacant. •Owners are interested in building a new home on the property. •A request for variance from setback standards was denied in 2024. •Current request is to vacate a 5-foot strip of public right-of-way between the property lines and sidewalk. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 400 SOUTH (POPLAR GROVE BLVD) STREET CONTEXT •City Arterial Street, approximately 106’ wide. 400 SOUTH VIADUCT TRAIL •The Transportation Division recommends preserving right-of-way along 400 South to facilitate future improvements. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 1100 WEST STREET CONTEXT •Local Street, approximately 66’ wide. •Dead end street leading to the Neighborhood House Riverside Adult Day Center. •Retaining wall and stairs encroaching into the right-of-way area. •No future transportation improvements planned for this street. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PC RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted on May 28th to recommend that the City Council approve the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and deny the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Andy Hulka Senior Planner andy.hulka@slc.gov 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2025 (Vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 400 South and 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South) An ordinance vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 400 South and 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 28, 2025, to consider a request made by Erik Sansom (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178) to vacate portions of 400 South and 1100 West in order to facilitate the future construction of a new single-family residence on the property located at 1101 West 400 South; and WHEREAS, at its May 28, 2025, hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way within 1100 West, and a negative recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right- of-way within 400 South to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of 400 South and 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is hereby vacated and declared not necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 3 ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. ROW Vacation near 1101 West 400 South_v2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___10/15/2025_____________________ By: ___________________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the portion of property to be vacated, which is a portion of 400 South and 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South: BEGINNING AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST 11 FEET OF LOT 12, BLOCK 6, CITY PARK SUBDIVISION; RUNNING THENCE NORTH 5 FEET; THENCE EAST 41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 149 FEET; THENCE WEST 5 FEET TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLOCK 6, CITY PARK SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 144 FEET; THENCE WEST 36 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. Containing: 925 square feet or 0.02 acres +/- SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/30/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/06/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Hulka, Andy E-mail Andy.Hulka@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/04/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/06/2025 Subject: Partial Street Vacation - 1101 W 400 S New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: "As to form" signature block has been updated. Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Andy Hulka, andy.hulka@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Recommending approval of the vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West, and denial of the vacation of the right-of-way along 400 South. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process • Early Notification – On March 18, 2025, the Poplar Grove Community Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council provided a letter ofsupport, which is attached to the Planning Commission staff report for review. A notice of theproposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. An onlineopen house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from March to May. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a publichearing on May 28th, 2025. The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation ofapproval for the vacation on the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation ofdenial for the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. The full public meeting can beviewed using this link starting at 57:00. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Erik Sansom, applicant and property owner, is requesting approval to vacate a portion of public right-of-way adjacent to his property at the corner of 400 South and 1100 West. The area in question is approximately 5 feet between the property boundaries and the public sidewalk. This request would not impact the sidewalk. The applicant is requesting the partial street vacation to facilitate the future construction of a new single-family residence on the property. The application pointed to lack of use as the primary reason for this request. (Aerial view of subject property) The following concerns were identified specific to vacating the right-of-way along 400 South: • Vacation along 400 South would result in an inconsistent right-of-way width along the 400 South corridor. If approved, this request would result in a right-of-way that is 5 feet narrower than the rest of the corridor. • Vacating the right-of-way along 400 South could limit options for future improvements in the area. The 400 South Viaduct Trail, a multi-use trail from 900 West to 200 West, is scheduled to begin construction this summer. No formal plans are currently proposed to extend this trail to the west; however, the Transportation Division has noted the possibility of a trail extension sometime in the future. The street context on 1100 West differs from the context on 400 South. 1100 West is a dead-end street, leading to a gated parking lot for the Neighborhood House Riverside Adult Day Center. Because the street ends after the subject property, the request to vacate this portion of right-of-way would not result in inconsistent right-of-way widths. This right-of-way segment also includes stairs and a retaining wall, which are significant obstructions that materially block the right-of-way. Because the area has been developed and used as private yard space with obstructions that block the right-of-way, this portion of the request complies with the “lack of use” standard in the code. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on May 28th, 2025, and voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West, and denial of the vacation of the right-of-way along 400 South. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification – On March 18, 2025, the Poplar Grove Community Council was sent the 45- day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council provided a letter of support, which is attached to the Planning Commission staff report for review. A notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. An online open house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from March to May. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on May 28th, 2025. The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation of approval for the vacation on the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation of denial for the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. The full public meeting can be viewed using this link starting at 57:00. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of May 28, 2025 b) PC Minutes of May 28, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of May 28, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List 5. Ordinance This page has intentionally been left blank EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00178 - Partial Street Vacation at 1101 W 400 S February 25, 2025 Petition for the Street Vacation was accepted by Salt Lake City Planning Division. March 10, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-00178 was assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. March 18, 2025 Early notification was sent to the Poplar Grove Community Council Chair, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. March 18, 2025 An early notification letter was sent to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the portions of the right-of-way requested to be vacated. May 2, 2025 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. May 16, 2025 Public hearing notice signs with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at the subject property. May 28, 2025 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to approve the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation to deny the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00178, a petition submitted by the property owners of 1101 W 400 S to vacate a portion of the street right-of-way adjacent to their property at the corner of 400 South and 1100 West. When a portion of a street is vacated, it is no longer public property. In this case, the petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the street right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area in question is approximately 5 feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. The subject property is located within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: PLACE: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Andy Hulka at 801-535-6608 or via e-mail at andy.hulka@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00178. The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION ALLEY / STREET VACATION PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 5 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. REQUIRED FEES • Alley Vacation: $316 filing fee †. • Street Vacation: $473 filing fee. • Additional required notice fees will be assessed after submission. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. I M P O R T A N T I N F O R M A T I O N ALLEY / STREET VACATION DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. FOOTNOTES: † ALLEY VACATION FEE WAIVER AVAILABLE IF ADEQUATE SIGNATURES ARE OBTAINED. Owner Contractor* Other*Architect* REQUEST CASE NUMBER MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner’s consent required) A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N O F F I C E U S E LOCATION OF ALLEY / STREET PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) EMAIL PHONE PHONE EMAIL IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST 1100 W 400 S Move property line to sidewalks edge on the east and north side of property Erik G Sansom 509-240-4099 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 erikgsansom@gmail.com Erik Sansom 509-240-4099 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 erikgsansom@gmail.com 4th South House ALLEY / STREET VACATION PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 6 NAME OF OWNER EMAIL PHONEMAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS APPLICATION TYPE A C K N O W L E D G M E N T O F R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y L E G A L P R O P E R T Y O W N E R C O N S E N T NAME OF APPLICANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY EMAIL SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE 1. This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. If the applicant is not the legal owner of the property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. 1. If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2. If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3. If a Home Owner’s Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PART 5. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. erikgsansom@gmail.com 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 509-240-4099 Street/Alley Vacation 2/24/25 E 11 FT OF LOT 12 & ALL OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB. Erik Sansom erikgsansom@gmail.com 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 2/24/25 Erik G Sansom Right Of Way Vacation To Whom It May Concern, I, Erik Sansom, am petitioning the city to relinquish its interest in the right of way on the East and North sides of my property located at 1101 W 400 S. The land I am attempting to acquire from the city is the five feet (5’) of land between my property line and the city sidewalk on the East and North sides of my property. The East side pertaining to 1100 W and the North side pertaining to 400 S. The purpose of petitioning for this property acquisition started when Jason and I (property owners) attempted to rebuild the current home that sits on the property. The home was built in 1906 and had been abandoned for almost 20 years before Jason and I took ownership. Leading it to be severely dilapidated making a new rebuild of the home the most logical choice. As we started to file the necessary paperwork with the city to rebuild the home we quickly realized that according to current city code we were unable to accomplish a rebuild of the home as it sits on the lot today. The code demanded that the new home be three feet (3’) smaller in width and adding a garage would make our lot coverage exceed the allowable amount by three hundred twenty four square feet (324’). In addition the code demanded we move the home four feet (4’) rearward from its current location to comply with the block face average. These demands of the code stem from our property being a legal non complying lot that does not meet the minimum standards required for an R-1/5000 lot. Mainly the width of the property only being thirty six feet (36’) effecting us the most. Because of these code issues we applied for a variance request and we were denied because of the aforementioned issues. Leading us now to apply for this right of way request in order to bring our current lot and home into greater compliance with the current residential building codes thus allowing us to rebuild the home that has stood for almost 120 years. If our request was granted from the city not only would it solve some of the issues we currently have with setback rules but also the conflict of maintaining the land that is owned by the city. Currently on the east side of the property a retaining wall that spans almost half of the lot depth sits at the sidewalk edge with no setbacks. It is in signifiant disrepair and needs to be addressed which was part of our plans to accomplish. This retaining wall which grants access to our property with stairs resides completely on city property and legally does not belong to us. This may become an issue with who or how repairs to this wall are made. Jason and I currently maintain all of this city owned property that equals to nine hundred twenty five square feet (925²’). If we were able to acquire this portion of property we would be able to repair the retaining wall and maintain landscaping as part of our property all while solving our issues of building a new home. With our variance request we have acquired signatures of abutting property owners and most owners within the block face showing support of our plans to renew this dilapidated property. We feel that if the city relinquishes this portion of land to us we will be able to accomplish what our neighbors and community desire which is a revitalized and aesthetically pleasing home. To address the bullet points the city provided in the policy considerations on the application form. We believe our request is unique because we don’t want the street or alley to be vacated in its entirety but rather our property lines be updated to coincide with the visual appearance of our lot and also to placate any issues that may arise from a maintenance perspective. This acquisition would not affect any abutting property owners as we are the only property that borders the requested land although we do have their support. It does not create a landlocked property or block access to private or public property and does not affect parking or access to the public street, alleyway or sidewalk. It also will not affect the ability for abutting properties to build new structures or maintain their ability to access their rear yard from the alleyway due to the fact that we want to maintain the rear property line abutting the public alley. To add to the issues presented by the city, the right of ways in question are not in current use by the city or any utility. They are simply “dead space” between our property line and the sidewalk. This change of property line would also not affect having or maintaining a park strip as the current park strip would remain between the sidewalk and gutter. A six foot (6’) strip on the east side of the property and a four foot (4’) strip on the north side. For all of these reasons we believe that vacating this right of way to the property at 1101 W 400 S would not only be justifiable but beneficial to the betterment of our community in poplar grove. In summary we are petitioning to acquire the five feet (5’) of land between our property and the city sidewalk on the east and north sides of our property. This solves our current setback issues and lot coverage issues by adding an additional nine hundred twenty five square feet (925²’) and adjusting the property lines to bring the existing home into setback compliance. Also allowing us to have a greater ability to maintain all aspects of the property. Thank you for your consideration and we hope to have a positive response to our petition. Erik Sansom 4. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SOLOMON J CHACON; SILVIA P CHACON (JT)945 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SALT LAKE CITY 340 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 STRENGTH, PC 1123 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 DONALD C GOODIN; SHARON J GOODIN (JT 1117 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BRITTNY RENE 1115 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 HEBER HERNANDEZ PO BOX 461 MILLVILLE UT 84326 NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION 1050 W 500 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ERIK SANSOM; JASON SEATON 809 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN C MENDOZA JR 1079 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JAVIER MARTINEZ; BLANCA E MARTINEZ (JT)1071 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN GONZALEZ; ANTONIA A MAGANA (JT)1065 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHI NGUYEN; PARI PHOTHIRATH (JT)1063 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MERCEDES GARDUNO 1057 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHRISTIE LYNN DUK 1055 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN HERRERA; NATHANIEL TOPAHA (JT) 1053 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LUCAS DUFFEY; SHAWN KELLY DUFFEY (JT) 418 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BARBARA CHRISTIE NEILL 420 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GREGORY E CRAFTS 438 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BARBARA RUFENACHT 444 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 Current Occupant 1115 W 300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 354 S BOTHWELL ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1107 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1121 W 400 S #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1124 W 500 S #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1131 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1129 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 5. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2025 (Vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South) An ordinance vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 28, 2025, to consider a request made by Erik Sansom (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178) to vacate portions of 400 South and 1100 West in order to facilitate the future construction of a new single-family residence on the property located at 1101 West 400 South; and WHEREAS, at its May 28, 2025, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way within 1100 West, and a negative recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right- of-way within 400 South to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is hereby vacated and declared not necessary or available for public use. The request to vacate the portion of 400 South is denied. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 3 ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. ROW Vacation near 1101 West 400 South_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___7/28/2025_______________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords____________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the property to be vacated, which is a portion of 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South: BEGINNING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB.; RUNNING THENCE EAST 5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 144 FEET; THENCE WEST 5 FEET TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB.; THENCE NORTH 144 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB. TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. This page has intentionally been left blank Item E1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel Public Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO RICH’S GRUB HOUSES LLC (D/B/A RICH’S BURGERS N GRUB) AT 30 EAST 300 SOUTH MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council adopt the ordinance approving a $40,000 loan For Rich’s Grub Houses LLC (doing business as Rich’s Burgers N Grub) from the Economic Development Loan Fund. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the ordinance, and proceed to the next agenda item. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO RICH’S GRUB HOUSES LLC (D/B/A RICH’S BURGERS N GRUB) AT 30 EAST 300 SOUTH ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE $40,000 loan at a 10.5% interest rate over seven years. This loan will assist in the creation of two to four new jobs in the next year and the retention of eight existing ones. Funds will also pay for Machinery and equipment, and leasehold improvements. Goal of the briefing: Review a proposed $40,000 loan from the Economic Development Loan Fund to Rich’s Burgers N Grub, before taking action during the October 21 formal meeting. POLICY QUESTIONS Item Schedule: Page | 2 to others. For example, are risk factors evaluated for each company, like outstanding loans, years in business, etc.? 3.What outreach does the Department do to ensure a diverse pool of businesses successfully applies to the EDLF? Are applications from diverse owners, particularly those whose businesses are located on the Westside, offered additional support through the application process? Does EDLF staff have ideas for improving access that would benefit from program changes or additional funding? 4. The Council may wish to request a more general update on EDLF use and processes. This could include the number of applications, review criteria used, loan program goals, etc. ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION A.Interest Rates. For context, the nationwide median rates for urban small business commercial and industrial loans in the second quarter of 2024 (the most recent data available) were 7.77% for fixed-rate loans and 8.88% for variable rate loans, according to the most recent U.S. Federal Reserve Small Business Lending Survey*. In the second quarter of 2022, these rates were 4.50% and 5.55% respectively. Interest rates for EDLF loans consider an assessment of the risk level of different applicants, among other factors, and include potential interest rate reductions. Interest rates have ranged from 7.25% for nearly all 2022 EDLF loans to an average of 9.55% in 2023 and 2024. *Source: Small Business Lending Survey, New Small Business Lending Declines as Credit Standards Continue to Tighten. Consulted on October 7, 2025, at https://www.kansascityfed.org/surveys/small- business-lending-survey/new-small-business-lending-declines-as-credit-standards-continue-to- tighten/. B.Interest Rate Reductions. The bases for potential reductions are as follows: 1.Location within a priority area: RDA Project Area; Opportunity Zone; West of I-15; or Neighborhood Business Improvement Program (NBIP, previously known as Façade Improvement) target area. 2.Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individuals (SEDI)-Owned Businesses: 51% of the business is owned by at least one SEDI individual. 3.Low Income Business Owner: Income does not exceed 80% of Salt Lake County average median income (AMI) as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 4.Sustainability: Either, a. Membership in SLC Green’s E2 Business Program; or b. Loan proceeds will be used for the purchase of electric vehicles, electric vehicle charging stations and infrastructure, renewable energy including but not limited to wind and solar, heat pumps, high efficiency equipment, and/or energy efficiency. The interest rate reductions applied to this application are detailed below: Rich’s Burgers N Grub 7.5% prime rate + 4% ELDF charge – 1% for Location within a Priority Area (CBD CRA Project Area) ___________________________ 10.5.0% final interest rate Page | 3 C.Program. The EDLF is administered by the Department of Economic Development, which is charged with maintaining the corpus of the EDLF in a manner sufficient to perpetuate the program's goals. Each loan application is pre-screened, and an underwriting analysis and economic impact statement are completed before an application may be recommended for Loan Committee (see below) review. Information on successful applications is transmitted to the Council to consider for final approval. Available balance and amount of outstanding loans. The Department reported that the Fund’s available balance was approximately $7,300,000 on July 31, 2025, and outstanding loans totaled approximately $5,800,000. EDLF Committee Membership. The Department of Economic Development lists nine members of the EDLF Committee as follows: City Employees Community Volunteers SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/25/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/30/2025 From: Department * Economic Development Employee Name: Jimenez-Garcia, Minerva E-mail Minerva.Jimenez-Garcia@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/30/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/30/2025 Subject: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund (EDLF) – Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub Additional Staff Contact: Colin Gibbs, Business Development Director, Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Minerva Jimenez-Garcia, Project Manager, Minerva.Jimenez-Garcia@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Colin Gibbs, Business Development Director, Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Minerva Jimenez-Garcia, Project Manager, Minerva.Jimenez-Garcia@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Budget Impact: $40,000 from the EDLF Recommendation: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of $40,000 loan to Rich’sGrub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ERIN MENDENHALL MAYOR LORENA RIFFO-JENSON DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________________ Date Received: _________________________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ____________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 23, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: SUBJECT: Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund (EDLF) – Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub STAFF CONTACTS: Colin Gibbs, Business Development Director, Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Minerva Jimenez-Garcia, Project Manager, Minerva.Jimenez-Garcia@slc.gov DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of $40,000 loan to Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub. BUDGET IMPACT: $40,000 from the Economic Development Loan Fund BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On August 14, 2025, a loan request from Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub was presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion. Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub is known for serving eclectic high-end burgers and sandwiches and uses proprietary meats, bacon, sauces and seasonings. Basic Loan Request Business Name: Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub Address: 30 E Broadway Loan Amount Requested: $40,000 Loan Term: 7 years Interest Rate: 10.5% Use of Funds: Machinery and equipment, and leasehold improvements Loan Type: Existing Council District: 4 Reasoning behind staff recommendation Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) go through a thorough application process consisting of pre-screening, underwriting analysis and economic impact statement. Only after the loan applicant goes through these processes, then the loan is recommended to be reviewed by the Loan Committee members. Upon the thorough review of the Loan Committee members then a recommendation is made before the loan is transmitted to the Mayor for Council to receive the recommendation for final approval. Because the Loan Committee review process must adhere to the Open Meetings Act, DED’s staff has worked closely with the City Attorney’s Office to ensure that applicants’ information is protected and at the same time the public process is followed. In addition, the EDLF loans must meet the following goals of the Economic Development Loan Fund as stated in the EDLF program guidelines. This loan meets the EDLF program guidelines in the following areas. • Stimulating business development • Encouraging private investment • Enhancing neighborhood vitality • Promoting economic development This loan will assist in the creation of 2-4 new jobs in the next year and retention of 8 current jobs. This loan was recommended by the EDLF Committee to the City Council for approval. EDLF Loan Balances 1. As of July 31, 2025, the EDLF available fund balance is approximately $7.3M. 2. As of July 31, 2025, the total amount of outstanding loans is approximately $5.8 million. EDLF Loan Committee There is a total of nine (9) EDLF Committee members. City Employees: 1. Community and Neighborhood’s Finance 2. Mayor’s Office 3. Employee at large 4. Housing Stability 5. Economic Development Community Volunteers: 6. Business Advisory Board (BAB) member 7. Banker 8. Community lender 9. Business mentor Attachments: Terms Sheet and Ordinance LOAN TERM SHEET Applicant: Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub Address: 30 E Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Proposed Loan Terms Loan Amount: $40,000 Monthly Payment: $674.43 Loan Terms: 7 Years Interest Rate Calculation Prime Interest Rate: 7.50% (At the time of completion for Part B of the Application on July 11, 2025) Plus EDLF Charge: 4% Less Discount: 1% for each • Priority Area (CBD CRA Project Area) Final Interest Rate: 10.5% Use of Funds: Machinery & Equipment, Leasehold Improvements Loan Type: Existing Collateral: Equipment Personal Guarantees: Richard Shellene Conditions for Closing • None • Obtain all City approvals, execute all loan documents as deemed necessary by City legal counsel and DED staff, such other terms as recommended by City legal counsel and DED staff. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Ordinance approving a $40,000 loan for Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub, at 30 E Broadway from the Economic Development Loan Fund) WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation’s (“City”) Economic Development Loan Fund (“EDLF”) is a program to stimulate local business development, encourage private investment, enhance neighborhood vitality, and boost commercial enterprise in Salt Lake City. WHEREAS, the EDLF is administered by the Department of Economic Development (“DED”) and loan applications are first prescreened by DED staff and then reviewed by the EDLF Loan Committee. WHEREAS, the EDLF Loan Committee and DED staff recommend the approval of the attached loan term sheet for a $40,000 loan to Rich’s Grub Houses LLC d/b/a Rich’s Burgers N Grub, a local business located at 30 E Broadway. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, that: SECTION 1. Loan Approval. The City Council approves the loan outlined in the Term Sheet attached hereto, subject to revisions that do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City hereunder. The City Council authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute the loan agreement and any other relevant documents consistent with the Term Sheet, and incorporating such other terms and agreements as recommended by the City Attorney’s office. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of _____________________, 2025. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: September 9, 2025 /s/ Sara Montoya Sara Montoya, City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Item F1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Michael Sanders Public Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE:HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN MOTION 1 – ADOPT RESOLUTION I move that the Council approve the resolution adopting the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not approve the resolution, and proceed to the next agenda item. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/11/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/15/2025 From: Department * Fire Employee Name: Lopez, Catherine E-mail Catherine.Lopez@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/11/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/12/2025 Subject: Hazard Mitigation Plan Additional Staff Contact: Ty Shepherd, Division Chief Rob Stafford, Assistant ChiefJaysen Oldroyd, City Attorney Presenters/Staff Table Ty Shepherd, tyler.shepherd@slc.govRobert. stafford@slc.govJaysen Oldroyd, City Attorney Document Type Information Item Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Adoption of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. These plans are updated every five years. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City Jurisdictional Annex to the Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan Month XXXX | Draft X.X THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City i Table of Contents Salt Lake City Annex 1 Planning Process Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 1 Jurisdiction Profile ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Date of Incorporation ............................................................................................................................. 2 Location and Description ....................................................................................................................... 2 Population .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Demographics ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Brief History ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Public Services ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Governing Body ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Development Trends .............................................................................................................................. 5 Jurisdiction-Specific Hazards and Risk ..................................................................................................... 5 Hazard Event History ................................................................................................................................. 8 National Flood Insurance Program Summary ......................................................................................... 11 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities and Impacts .................................................................................... 14 Jurisdiction-Specific Changes in Vulnerability ......................................................................................... 36 Additional Public Involvement ................................................................................................................. 46 Plan Integration ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Capability Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 49 Planning and Regulatory Capabilities .................................................................................................. 49 Administrative and Technical Capabilities ........................................................................................... 53 Financial Capabilities ........................................................................................................................... 55 Education and Outreach Capabilities .................................................................................................. 57 Opportunities to Expand and/or Improve Capabilities ......................................................................... 58 Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................................................................... 59 Mitigation Success Story ...................................................................................................................... 71 SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ii Salt Lake City List of Figures Figure 1: Salt Lake City/BeReadySLC Social Media Post for the Hazard Mitigation Survey (left) and Second Post for the Hazard Mitigation Survey (right) ................................................................................. 46 Figure 2: Salt Lake City Newsletter Announcement of the Public Survey .................................................. 47 List of Tables Table 1: Contact Information for Salt Lake City ............................................................................................ 1 Table 2: Participant List for Salt Lake City .................................................................................................... 1 Table 3: Calculated Priority Risk Index Values for Salt Lake City ................................................................ 5 Table 4: Criteria for the Calculated Priority Risk Index ................................................................................. 6 Table 5: History of Weather Hazard Events in Salt Lake City since 2019 .................................................... 8 Table 6: History of Hazard Events in Salt Lake City ..................................................................................... 9 Table 7: National Flood Insurance Program Status for Salt Lake City ....................................................... 11 Table 8: National Flood Insurance Policies for White City .......................................................................... 11 Table 9: NFIP Floodplain Management Capabilities and Compliance ....................................................... 11 Table 10: NFIP Floodplain Mapping Capabilities and Compliance............................................................. 13 Table 11: NFIP Flood Insurance and Outreach Information ....................................................................... 13 Table 12: Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities and Impacts in Salt Lake City ............................................. 14 Table 13: Jurisdiction-Specific Changes in Vulnerability in Salt Lake City ................................................. 37 Table 14: Integration of Previous Plans by Salt Lake City .......................................................................... 48 Table 15: Opportunities for Integration with Future Plans of Salt Lake City ............................................... 48 Table 16: Assessment of the Planning Capabilities of Salt Lake City ........................................................ 49 Table 17: Assessment of the Regulations and Ordinances of Salt Lake City ............................................ 50 Table 18: Assessment of the Administrative Capabilities of Salt Lake City ................................................ 54 Table 19: Assessment of the Technical Capabilities of Salt Lake City ....................................................... 54 Table 20: Assessment of the Financial Capabilities of Salt Lake City ........................................................ 56 Table 21: Assessment of the Education and Outreach Capabilities of Salt Lake City ............................... 57 Table 22: Opportunities to Expand and/or Improve the Capabilities of Salt Lake City ............................... 58 Table 23: Mitigation Action Alternatives for Salt Lake City ......................................................................... 59 Table 24: Status of Prior Mitigation Actions of Salt Lake City ..................................................................... 59 Table 25: 2025 Mitigation Action Plan for Salt Lake City ............................................................................ 63 SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 1 Salt Lake City Annex To participate in this multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan (MJHMP) update for Salt Lake County (SLCo), the governing body of Salt Lake City passed a formal resolution, a copy of which is maintained at the local government offices. Planning Process Contact Information Table 1 provides information on the point of contact during the updating of the MJHMP. Table 1: Contact Information for Salt Lake City Name Contact Information Ty Shepherd Phone: 801-577-9008 email: tyler.shepherd@slc.gov Salt Lake City has a fully integrated approach to hazard mitigation planning and program implementation. During the 2024 update process, the MJHMP participation roles in Table 2 were recorded. Participation opportunities included invitations to meetings, completing the public survey, reviewing and contributing to forms, and reviewing the plan draft. Table 2: Participant List for Salt Lake City Name Title Jurisdiction Kevin Barjenbruch Warning Coordination Meteorologist National Weather Service Gary Carter Planning Section Chief Salt Lake City Ty Shepherd Division Chief/Emergency Manager Salt Lake City Jason Draper Chief Engineer Floodplain Administrator Salt Lake City Matt Wilson Emergency Management Planning Coordinator Salt Lake City Hannah Youell Emergency Management Public Information Officer/Joint Information Center Coordinator Salt Lake City Nick Bleckert Urban Forestry Operations Manager Salt Lake City Urban Forestry Public Lands Mike Guymon Deputy Chief Engineer Salt Lake City Public Utilities Kyle Shields Parks Operations Manager Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Tyler Fanarow Recreation Trails Project Manager Salt Lake City Parks and Public Lands Tom Simons Emergency Management Operations Captain Salt Lake City Tess Alexander Emergency Management Community Preparedness Salt Lake City Eric Witt Emergency Management Training Specialist Salt Lake City Audrey Pierce Emergency Management Critical Infrastructure Salt Lake City SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2 Salt Lake City Name Title Jurisdiction Carmen Bailey Deputy Director Public Lands Salt Lake City Chad Korb Deputy Director – Information Management Services Salt Lake City Debbie Lyons Director of Sustainability Salt Lake City Chris Bell Deputy Director of Sustainability Salt Lake City Julie Crookston Deputy Director Public Services Salt Lake City Jurisdiction Profile Date of Incorporation 1847 Location and Description Salt Lake City is in the northeast corner of the Salt Lake Valley, surrounded by the Great Salt Lake to the northwest and the steep Wasatch and Oquirrh mountain ranges on the eastern and southwestern borders, respectively. Its encircling mountains contain several narrow glacial and stream-carved canyons. City Creek, Emigration Canyon, Millcreek Canyon, and Parley’s Canyon border the eastern city limits. Salt Lake City covers 110.4 mi² and has an average elevation of 4,327 feet above sea level. The lowest point in the city’s boundaries is 4,210 feet above sea level, near the Jordan River and the Great Salt Lake, and the highest is Grandview Peak, at 9,410 feet. Salt Lake City is separated from the Great Salt Lake by extensive marshlands and mudflats. Two to three times a year, the metabolic activities of bacteria in the lake create a phenomenon known as “lake stink,” a scent reminiscent of foul poultry eggs, for a few hours. The Jordan River, which is a drainage of Utah Lake, flows through the city and empties into the Great Salt Lake. The Salt Lake Valley floor is the ancient lakebed of Lake Bonneville, which existed at the end of the last Ice Age. Several Lake Bonneville shorelines appear distinctly on the foothills or benches of nearby mountains. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 3 Population The estimated population of Salt Lake City in 2024 was 212,570, up from 200,660 in 2020, reflecting a 5.94% increase.1 Demographics The average household income in Salt Lake City is $107,280, and the city has a poverty rate of 14.1%. The median age in Salt Lake City is 32.5 years, with males averaging 32.6 years and females 32.3 years. Salt Lake City, often abbreviated as SLC, is Utah’s capital and most populous city. SLC and Reno, Nevada, are the only two major urban areas in the Great Basin, and SLC is the largest city in the Intermountain West. Salt Lake City represents 6.75% of Utah’s total population and 18% of Salt Lake County’s population. The city has a higher population density than the surrounding area, with over 1,689 people per square mile.2 Brief History The city was founded in 1847 by Brigham Young, Isaac Morley, George Washington Bradley, and several other Mormon followers, who extensively irrigated and cultivated the arid valley. Immigration of international members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (or LDS), mining booms, and the construction of the first transcontinental railroad initially brought economic growth, and the city was nicknamed the Crossroads of the West. The Lincoln Highway, completed in 1913, was the first transcontinental highway, and it passes through the city. At present, two major cross-country freeways, I-15 and I-80, intersect in the city. Salt Lake City has developed a strong outdoor recreation tourist industry, based primarily on skiing and hosted the 2002 Winter Olympics. It is the industrial banking center of the United States. Climate The climate of the Salt Lake City area is characterized as semi-arid. Under the Köppen climate classification, Salt Lake City has a dry-summer continental climate (DSA), a relatively rare form of the continental climate in which a region experiences dry summers and wet winters. The city has four distinct seasons but the summers and winters are long. Spring is the wettest season, while summer is very dry. The nearby Great Salt Lake contributes significantly to precipitation in the city. The lake effect can help enhance rain from summer thunderstorms, and it produces lake effect snow approximately 6 to 8 times per year—some of which can be excessive snowfalls. It is estimated that about 10% of the annual precipitation in the city can be attributed to the lake effect. 1 World Population Review, “Salt Lake City, Utah Population 2024.” https://worldpopulationreview.com/us- cities/utah/salt-lake-city. 2 Ibid. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 4 Salt Lake City Salt Lake City features significant variations in temperatures between seasons. During summer, there is an average of 56 days per year with temperatures of at least 90°F (32.2°C), 23 days of at least 95°F (35°C), and five days of 100°F (37.8°C). However, the average daytime humidity in July is only 22%. Winters are cold but rarely frigid. Although there is an average of 127 days that drop to or below freezing and 26 days with high temperatures that fail to rise above freezing, the city averages only 2.3 days at or below 0°F (−17.8°C). The record high temperature is 107°F (42°C), which occurred first on July 26, 1960, and again on July 13, 2002, while the record low is −30°F (−34°C), which occurred on February 9, 1933. Substantial areas of high pressure often situate themselves over the Great Basin during mid-winter, leading to strong temperature inversions. This causes air stagnation and thick smog in the valley for several days or weeks and can lead to the worst air pollution levels in the U.S., reducing air quality to unhealthful levels. Public Services Given the nature of Utah’s population concentration along the Wasatch Front, Salt Lake City must support regional planning and maintain relationships with Salt Lake County and the other municipalities in the county. Salt Lake City has participated in area Gap Analysis and Threat Assessments and was funded to develop a Local Energy Assurance Plan. The city has also participated in the Regional Resilience and Assessment Program (RRAP), which looks at critical lifelines and interdependencies and deeply examines valley-wide water systems and critical nodes. Numerous participating agencies in Salt Lake City have also participated in the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), a program that uses a Whole Community Approach to help high-threat, high-density urban areas build and sustain the capabilities needed to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism. Salt Lake County received UASI funding for this mission in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2014, and 2017. The Urban Area Working Group (UAWG) includes Salt Lake County, with representatives from public safety agencies, volunteer organizations, and the state for regional all-hazards planning, mitigation, response, and recovery. Under Salt Lake City Code, Title 22 et al., Salt Lake City executives are responsible for carrying out plans and policies. The city government must be prepared to participate in the post-disaster hazard mitigation team process and pre-mitigation planning as outlined in the code to effectively protect its citizens. Governing Body The city has a seven-member elected council that sets the overall policy direction and determines resource allocation by adopting annual budgets and ordinances. In Salt Lake City, the Mayor and Council are separate but equal branches of government. The Mayor is the chief executive, and the City Council is the legislative body. Council Members serve four-year terms, work for the city part-time, and are paid. Each Council Member represents one of the city’s seven geographical Council Districts, which are of similar population size. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 5 Development Trends Salt Lake City is the capital of Utah and also the most populous city. It lies roughly in the center of the Salt Lake–Ogden–Provo Combined Statistical Area, which is a region of contiguous urban and suburban development along the Wasatch Front. Salt Lake City is central to the regional economy and is experiencing growth and development across several sectors, including real estate, technology, and infrastructure. Construction of new commercial and residential properties has occurred and is expected to continue. Possible development in the downtown area to expand entertainment venues is under consideration. The city is scheduled to host the 2034 Winter Olympics which may prompt additional development in the city. Jurisdiction-Specific Hazards and Risk The Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) is a comprehensive assessment tool for evaluating and prioritizing risks in a given context. It considers various factors, such as probability, impact, and urgency, to determine the level of risk associated with events or situations. The results for each hazard, including its risk factor (RF) value, are shown in Table 3. The results are based on the criteria in Table 4 and the equation that follows it. The CPRI helps organizations and individuals make informed decisions about risk management and mitigation strategies. It provides a systematic approach to identifying and addressing potential issues, allowing for a more efficient allocation of resources and proactive risk prevention. With the CPRI, stakeholders can prioritize their focus on the most critical risks, leading to more effective risk management and, ultimately, better outcomes. Table 3: Calculated Priority Risk Index Values for Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Probability of Future Events Spatial Extent Severity of Life/ Property Impact Warning Time Duration Response Capacity Risk Factor Value 4 1 2 4 2 1 2.6 Drought 4 4 2 1 4 1 2.8 Earthquake 3 4 4 4 3 2 3.4 Extreme Heat 4 4 3 1 3 1 3 Extreme Cold 3 4 2 1 3 1 2.4 Flooding 4 3 3 3 3 1 3.1 Landslide/ Slope Failure 2 1 2 4 1 2 2 Radon 4 4 2 1 4 2 2.9 Heavy Rain 4 3 2 3 1 1 2.6 High Wind 4 3 3 3 2 1 3 Lightning 4 2 2 4 1 1 2.6 Severe Winter 4 3 2 2 2 1 2.6 SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 6 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Probability of Future Events Spatial Extent Severity of Life/ Property Impact Warning Time Duration Response Capacity Risk Factor Value 2 2 3 4 1 2 2.4 Wildfire 4 3 3 4 3 1 3.2 Dam Failure Civil 2 1 2 4 2 2 2.1 Cyberattack 2 3 3 4 3 2 2.7 Hazardous Materials Incident (Transportation 3 1 2 4 1 1 2.2 Public Health Epidemic/ 3 4 3 1 4 1 2.8 Terrorism 2 1 3 4 2 1 2.3 Table 4: Criteria for the Calculated Priority Risk Index Risk Index Factor Degree of Risk Level Criteria Factor Weight for Degree of Risk Level Future Events 1 Unlikely Less than 1 percent probability of occurrence in the next year or a recurrence interval of greater than every 100 years. 30% 2 Occasional 1 to 10 percent probability of occurrence in the next year or a recurrence interval of 11 to 100 years. 3 Likely 11 to 90 percent probability of occurrence in the next year or a recurrence interval of 1 to 10 years. 4 Highly Likely 91 to 100 percent probability of occurrence in the next year or a recurrence interval of less than 1 year. Spatial Extent 1 Limited Less than 10% of the planning area could be impacted. 10% 2 Small 10%–25% of the planning area could be impacted 3 Significant 25%–50% of the planning area could be impacted. 4 Extensive 50%–100% of the planning area could be impacted. 1 Negligible Less than 5% of the affected area’s critical and 30% SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 7 Risk Index Factor Degree of Risk Level Criteria Factor Weight for Degree of Risk Level Life/Property Impact damaged/destroyed. Only minor property damage and minimal disruption of life. Temporary shutdown of critical facilities. 2 Limited More than 5% and less than 25% percent of property in the affected area is damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one day but less than one week. 3 Critical More than 25% and less than 50% of property in the affected area was damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for over a week but less than one month. 4 Catastrophic Over 50% of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructures in the affected area are damaged/destroyed. Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than one month. Warning Time 1 Self-defined More than 24 hours 10% 2 Self-defined 12 to 24 hours. 3 Self-defined 6 to 12 hours. Duration 1 Brief Up to 6 hours. 10% 2 Intermediate Up to one day. 4 Prolonged More than one week. Response Capacity 1 High Significant resources and capability to respond to this kind of event; staff are trained, experienced, and ready. 10% 2 Medium Some resources and capability to respond to this kind of staff; some staff may be trained, experienced, and ready while others may need 3 Low Limited resources and capability to respond to this kind of event; additional staff or staff training 4 None No resources and capability to respond this kind of event; additional outside support would be RISK FACTOR (RF) EQUATION RF Value = [(Probability x 0.30) + (Spatial Extent x 0.10) + (Severity of Life/Property Impact x 0.30) + SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 8 Salt Lake City (Warning Time x 0.10) + (Duration x 0.10) + (Response Capacity x 0.10)] Hazards with an RF value greater than or equal to 2.5 are considered high risk. Those with RF values of 2.0 to 2.4 are considered moderate risk hazards, and those with an RF value less than 2.0 are considered low risk. The highest possible RF value is 4. Hazard Event History Examining hazard event histories provides valuable insights to inform decision-making and help prioritize resources for risk prevention and response efforts. Table 5 lists the weather hazard events impacting Salt Lake City since the 2019 plan update, as recorded in the Storm Events Database from the National Centers for Environmental Information. Table 6 lists other hazard events that have impacted Salt Lake City. Table 5: History of Weather Hazard Events in Salt Lake City since 2019 3 Location Date Event Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 06/13/2019 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 07/04/2019 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 08/21/2021 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 08/21/2021 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $1,500 $0 Salt Lake City 09/02/2021 Hail 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 06/28/2022 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 07/17/2022 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 08/01/2022 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 04/18/2023 Hail 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City 07/24/2023 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $1,000 $0 Salt Lake City 07/24/2023 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $500 $0 3 National Centers for Environmental Information, “Storm Events Database.” https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?eventType=ALL&beginDate_mm=01&beginDate_d d=01&beginDate_yyyy=2019&endDate_mm=10&endDate_dd=31&endDate_yyyy=2024&county=SALT% 2BLAKE%3A35&hailfilter=0.00&tornfilter=0&windfilter=000&sort=DT&submitbutton=Search&statefips=49 %2CUTAH. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 9 Location Date Event Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Crop Damage 08/01/2023 Thunderstorm Wind Salt Lake City 09/30/2023 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $0 $0 Salt Lake City Wind Salt Lake City 07/13/2024 Thunderstorm Wind 0 0 $50,000 $0 Salt Lake City 08/09/2024 Thunderstorm 0 0 $0 $0 Table 6: History of Hazard Events in Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event FEMA Disaster # Date(s) Damage or Impacts Description N/A Drought N/A Drought is a recurring problem in the region Air quality issues, water restrictions Earthquake DR-4548- UT 03/18/2020 5.7 magnitude Extreme Heat N/A Summers of 2020–2024 Reported 9 deaths in Northern Utah, an upward trend in heat exposure and heat-related deaths since 2015. Excessive heat can also affect infrastructure. General impacts include increased risk for heat-related illness and increased power demand for cooling systems. Extreme Cold N/A Winter of 2022 and 2023 2022: 5 people experiencing homelessness died from cold- related exposure in Salt Lake City. Extreme cold can contribute to hypothermia and other cold-related illness/injury. Increased demand for heating systems. Potential for frozen pipes or other service disruptions. Flooding N/A Landslide/ Slope N/A SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 10 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event FEMA Disaster # Date(s) Damage or Impacts Description Radon N/A Over 25% of homes in Salt Lake are at or above WHO’s mitigation threshold. Unhealthy levels of radon gas have been measured in Salt Lake City homes. Heavy Rain N/A High Wind DR-4578- UT thousands of trees to fall and damaged sidewalks and vehicles and left extensive debris. Nearly 200,000 homes and businesses were without power. One individual was killed. affected multiple cities along the Wasatch Front. Lightning N/A Severe Winter N/A Tornado DR-1285- UT 08/11/1999 One person was killed; 80 injured, and there was $170 million in F2 tornado damaged downtown Salt Lake City Wildfire 07/20/2024 Sandhurst Fire burned on Ensign Peak near the State Capitol, prompting evacuation of 40 homes. Dam Failure N/A Civil Disturbance 05/30/2020 Rioters overturned a police vehicle and set it on fire. Buildings were sprayed with graffiti, and windows were broken. A peaceful protest in response to the death of George Floyd turned violent. Rioters overturned a police vehicle and set it on fire. Buildings were sprayed with graffiti and windows were Cyberattack Hazardous Materials Incident (Transporta- tion & Fixed N/A Public Health Epidemic/ DR-4525- UT 03/2019 COVID-19 Temporary business closures, economic impacts Terrorism SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 11 National Flood Insurance Program Summary Salt Lake City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Table 7 displays statistics related to the NFIP. Salt Lake City will continue to adopt and enforce floodplain management requirements, including regulating new construction of Special Flood Hazard Areas, making substantial improvement and/or damage determinations, or determining the permits required of owners to bring a substantially improved or damaged structure back into compliance. Salt Lake City participates in the Community Rating System (CRS). Table 7: National Flood Insurance Program Status for Salt Lake City 4 Init FHBM Identified Init FIRM Identified Current Effective Map Date Adopted Date Date Joined NFIP Tribal 12/27/74 08/01/83 11/19/21 2021 08/01/83 No Table 8: National Flood Insurance Policies for White City Community ID Number of Losses Total Net Payment Active Policies Total Coverage 490105D 177 $407,411.90 187 $74,054,000 The questions in Table 9 were answered to the best of Salt Lake City’s ability. Table 9: NFIP Floodplain Management Capabilities and Compliance Question Response Who is the floodplain manager? Is this their Jason Draper Does the floodplain manager have adequate training and capacity for their role? If not, Yes. Ongoing education on the latest FEMA guidelines and floodplain management practices is essential to maintain proficiency. How does the community enforce its floodplain rules? Does enforcement include monitoring compliance and acting to correct violations? The city enforces floodplain regulations through permitting processes, inspections, and compliance monitoring. Enforcement includes monitoring compliance and addressing violations through corrective actions. When was the community’s most recent Community Assistance Visit (CAV)? Unknown Were any violations noted on the community’s Unknown Is there an upcoming CAV? If not, is one needed? Unknown When was the most recent floodplain 2016 Does your community participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? If so, Participation: Yes 4 FIRM = Flood Insurance Rate Map, FHBM = Flood Hazard Boundary Map SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 12 Salt Lake City Question Response to achieve the CRS goals. The city has implemented public outreach programs, higher regulatory standards, and flood data maintenance. Does the community’s floodplain management ordinance include any higher standards? If so, please list. The ordinance includes freeboard requirements, floodway development restrictions, and cumulative substantial improvement rules. Who is responsible for permitting? The city’s Building Services and Public Utilities departments issue development permits in flood- prone areas. How does the community issue development permits in the special flood hazard area? Applicants must submit detailed plans demonstrating compliance with floodplain regulations, including elevation certificates and floodproofing measures. Does the community maintain elevation certificates? Yes, the city maintains elevation certificates for structures in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs). Does the community track the number of buildings in the special flood hazard area? If yes, are there any trends? Monitoring: The city tracks the number of buildings in SFHAs. Trends: Data on trends is not publicly available. How many repetitive loss (RL) structures does the community have? (List number and type of structure) The city has identified several RL structures, primarily residential. Information on SRL structures is limited. Some RL properties have been mitigated through elevation or acquisition. How many severe repetitive loss (SRL) structures does the community have? (List number and type of structure) The Building Services Department is responsible for these determinations. Assessments are conducted post-event to evaluate damage relative to the structure’s market value. Additional training and resources are needed to enhance capacity for these assessments. Information is disseminated through the city’s website and community meetings. Several substantially damaged structures have been elevated or retrofitted. Have any RL/SRL properties been mitigated since the last plan update? The city plans to update ordinances, enhance public education, and improve data management to maintain NFIP compliance. Who is responsible for making substantial damage/substantial improvement Building Services How does the substantial damage/substantial improvement process work in your Assessments are conducted post-event to evaluate damage relative to the structure’s market value. Is there sufficient staff and training to make substantial damage/substantial improvement Additional training and resources are needed to enhance capacity for these assessments. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 13 Question Response How are substantial damage/substantial improvement requirements messaged to the Information is disseminated through the city’s website and community meetings. Have any substantially damaged/substantially improved structures been mitigated since the Some buildings with unreinforced masonry have been updated. How will the community remain in compliance with the NFIP moving forward? (Simply stating “the community will continue to comply with the NFIP” will not meet FEMA’s planning The city plans to update ordinances, enhance public education, and improve data management to maintain NFIP compliance. Table 10: NFIP Floodplain Mapping Capabilities and Compliance Question Response requests? This could be requested during the Risk MAP process or through Letters of Map Amendment or Revision. The city assists property owners with applications for Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA) and Letters of Map Revision (LOMR). When did the latest Flood Insurance Rate Map 2016 When was the latest FIRM adopted? 2016 Is the FIRM and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report in an accessible location? How would the public get access to their flood map information? FIRM and FIS reports are available on the city’s website and at public libraries. Does the community use any Risk MAP Yes, the city uses Risk MAP products for planning and outreach. Does the community collect updated floodplain data or modeling? Is this shared The city collects updated data and shares it with FEMA and relevant partners. Other comments? None Table 11: NFIP Flood Insurance and Outreach Information Question Response How does the community educate the public on floodplain management and the availability of flood insurance, in and out of the It encourages communities to actively participate in NFIP (update from 2009) How does the community engage with Collaborations include informational sessions and resource sharing. Does the community (or state) have flood Yes, the state requires disclosure of flood hazards during property transactions. How familiar is the public with their flood insurance options? Awareness is moderate; ongoing education efforts are in place. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 14 Salt Lake City Question Response How many properties have flood insurance in Awareness is moderate; ongoing education efforts are in place. Are there any areas where flood insurance is lacking? Some older neighborhoods have lower insurance uptake. Other comments? Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities and Impacts In addition to the 212,570 residents of Salt Lake City who may be vulnerable to hazards, there are a significant number of assets in the city that are at risk. Critical facilities in the city include 14 fire stations, 2 emergency operations centers (EOCs), 5 hospitals, 9 police stations, and 85 schools. As the state capital and largest city in Utah, there are significant cultural and historic sites. Salt Lake City contains 32 county- owned facilities, including senior centers, recreation centers, sports complexes, performing arts venues, and government offices. There are 230 properties and districts listed on the National Register of Historic Places in Salt Lake City, including 4 National Historic Landmarks. Trax, FrontRunner, UTA bus lines, Amtrak, and Salt Lake City International Airport are critical transportation assets in the city. Major roads include I-15, I-80, I-215, Bangerter Highway, Highway 201, US-89/State Street, Redwood Road, Foothill Blvd., 700 East, and numerous others. Outdoor amenities include the International Peace Gardens, Sugarhouse Park, Liberty Park, City Creek Natural Area, Red Butte Garden, Hogle Zoo, 6 golf courses, and several trailheads. Salt Lake City manages a large watershed that includes City Creek, Parleys, Big Cottonwood, and Little Cottonwood Canyons in the Wasatch Mountains. Large capacity venues, such as the Salt Palace Convention Center, the Delta Center arena, the LDS Conference Center, Utah State Fairpark, Rice Eccles Stadium, and the Huntsman Center arena, may face unique challenges during hazard events. Table 12 provides information on the vulnerable assets in Salt Lake City, including its critical facilities, highlighting the city’s vulnerability to identified hazards. It also describes the potential impacts on the community arising from those vulnerabilities. Impacts are the consequences or effects of each hazard on the assets. By understanding the risks associated with these assets, local authorities can develop proactive strategies to mitigate vulnerabilities and ensure the safety and functionality of these important assets during hazard events. These data are invaluable for decision-making and prioritizing resources for emergency response and preparedness efforts, ultimately contributing to more effective risk management and greater resilience in the community. Table 12: Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities and Impacts in Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Avalanche People Vulnerability: • Recreational enthusiasts: Skiers, snowboarders, and snowshoers SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 15 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts they may not be familiar with avalanche terrain or conditions. Their activities often take them into areas prone to avalanches. • Inexperienced individuals: People without adequate training or knowledge about snow safety and avalanche risk are particularly vulnerable. The lack of awareness about signs of instability in the snowpack or how to respond in an avalanche situation can increase risk. • Tourists and non-locals: Visitors who are unfamiliar with the local geography and snow conditions might not recognize potential hazards. They might not know the terrain features that can influence avalanche risk. • Professionals in high-risk areas: Workers such as mountain guides and construction crews operating in mountainous regions may be at risk, especially during avalanche control work or if they are required to traverse unstable areas as part of their job. • Groups without proper gear: Those without appropriate safety equipment (such as avalanche beacons, probes, and shovels) are at greater risk because they may not be able to respond effectively to an avalanche event. • Individuals ignoring warnings: People who do not heed avalanche warnings or neglect to check avalanche forecasts before going into the backcountry may place themselves in harm’s way. Impacts: Avalanches pose a direct threat to outdoor enthusiasts, which can lead to injuries or fatalities. Structures Vulnerability: • Residential buildings: Homes in or near avalanche-prone areas are at risk. • Industrial facilities: Warehouses and manufacturing plants in high- risk zones may be threatened by sliding snow and ice, which can cause significant property damage. • Parking lots and garages: Open areas can be particularly susceptible, as snow can slide off slopes and collect in these spaces, leading to vehicle damage. Impacts: Property damage can occur to structures in avalanche paths and along transportation routes. Roofs may not be designed to withstand the weight of accumulated snow, which increases the likelihood of structural failure. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses throughout the city are vulnerable to direct and indirect losses from avalanche. Residential properties, commercial buildings, tourism-related businesses, agricultural businesses, and travel- and transportation-related assets are at risk. Impacts: The local economy may suffer, especially businesses reliant on winter tourism along with increased insurance costs. • Roads and highways: Critical transportation routes may be blocked or destroyed by avalanches, disrupting trade and travel. • Railways: Similar to roads, railway tracks can be buried or damaged, which affects goods transport and passenger services. • Bridges: Avalanche debris can damage bridge structures, leading SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 16 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts • Residential properties: Homes in avalanche-prone areas may suffer damage or total loss, leading to significant financial impacts on their owners. • Commercial buildings: Businesses in vulnerable areas might face closures or property damage, resulting in lost revenue and increased insurance costs. • Hotels and lodges: Properties that attract tourists might be at risk, which affects occupancy rates and local economies. • Crops and livestock: Avalanches can destroy farmland and harm livestock, leading to economic losses for farmers and disruptions in the local food supply. • Recreational facilities: Recreational sites can suffer damage, Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Wildlife habitat, forests and vegetation, water resources, historic sites, cultural sites, archaeological sites, and recreation areas are at risk. Impacts: • Wildlife habitat: The mountainous areas surrounding Salt Lake City are home to diverse wildlife, including species that rely on specific habitats. Avalanches can destroy nesting areas and food sources. • Forests and vegetation: Mountain forests, including pine and aspen trees, can be damaged or destroyed by avalanches, which impacts local ecosystems and alters water runoff patterns. • Water sources: Streams and rivers originating from the mountains may become blocked or altered by avalanche debris, which affects water quality and availability. • Historic sites and structures: Some historical landmarks or sites in vulnerable mountainous areas could be at risk of avalanches. These might include old mining structures or historic cabins. • Cultural trails: Various trails with historical significance, used for recreation or as routes for indigenous peoples, may be impacted, making them unsafe or inaccessible. Cultural institutions: Museums and historical sites in elevated areas may face risks from avalanches. • Archaeological sites: Sites tied to Native American history or early settler activity may be susceptible to avalanche damage, potentially resulting in the loss of valuable artifacts and information about the region’s past. • Recreational areas: Popular recreational sites can face risks from avalanches, which affect community activities and local tourism. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: I-80, I-215, and major roads, power substations and distribution lines, water treatment facilities and infrastructure, and emergency response capacity are all vulnerable to avalanches. Impacts: • Transportation: Major highways like I-80 and I-215 can be obstructed by avalanches, impacting travel and transit systems. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 17 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts leading to blockages and the potential for damage to vehicles and road surfaces. • Utilities: Power lines, substations, and water supply infrastructure may be damaged by avalanche debris, disrupting essential services. These events can bring down power lines, causing outages and costly remediation efforts. Structures that support critical infrastructure, such as communication towers, can be compromised during avalanche events, affecting service delivery. • Water supply systems: Damage to water treatment plants or pipelines can disrupt access to clean water. • Emergency services: Fire stations and hospitals near mountainous areas are at risk of inaccessibility during avalanche events, hindering emergency responses. Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor recreation is a significant community asset that can be severely disrupted by avalanches. Skiing, snowboarding, hiking, snowshoeing, winter sports competitions, and snowmobiling are vulnerable to both potential risks for participants and the possible cancellation of activities, leading to associated losses. Impacts: • Skiing and snowboarding: The nearby ski resorts attract a large number of visitors each winter. Areas with steep slopes and fresh snowfall can pose significant avalanche risks. • Hiking and snowshoeing: Many residents and tourists participate in winter hiking and snowshoeing in the Wasatch Mountains. Trails that traverse avalanche-prone zones can expose hikers to dangerous conditions, especially during or after heavy snowfall. • Backcountry recreation: Adventurers seeking untouched snow often venture into backcountry areas. These individuals may not be fully aware of avalanche risks and conditions, which makes them susceptible to accidents. • Mountain climbing: Climbing in steep or snowy areas can be dangerous, particularly if the weather changes suddenly or if climbers are not equipped with the necessary safety gear. • Snowmobiling: Off-trail snowmobiling in mountainous regions can trigger avalanches due to the added weight and disturbance Drought People Vulnerability: A lack of drinking water affects all populations. Impacts: Extended drought can lead to restrictions on water use, increased costs for water, and limited drinking water supply. Drought can contribute to poor air and water quality. Structures Vulnerability: Structures are vulnerable to drought because a lack of water for landscaping poses challenges. Impacts: Lack of water can impact future development, especially regarding landscaping needs. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Outdoor recreation businesses and agriculture are vulnerable to drought, particularly due to a lack of snow. Impacts: Low snowpack can cause a decline in winter tourism and potentially significant economic losses to ski and other outdoor SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 18 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts systems, as an insufficient water supply can hinder crop production and livestock health. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: The decline of the Great Salt Lake affects bird and other wildlife habitats. Impacts: A dry lakebed impacts public health, causes economic loss related to the lake, and affects migratory birds. Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: The city water supply, fire service, transportation networks, healthcare facilities, energy sector, wastewater treatment are all vulnerable to drought. Impacts: • Water supply systems: The municipal water supply relies heavily on snowmelt and reservoir storage. During prolonged droughts, reduced snowpack can diminish water availability, impacting water treatment plants and distribution systems. • Fire services: Fire stations and emergency services may face challenges in suppressing wildfires, which can be exacerbated by dry conditions. Drought reduces water availability for firefighting efforts. • Transportation infrastructure: Drought can affect road maintenance, particularly in areas where water is used for dust control or where deteriorating soil conditions could affect road stability. • Public health facilities: Hospitals and clinics may experience increased strain during droughts due to health complications arising from water scarcity, such as heat-related illnesses and the spread of vector-borne diseases. • Alternative energy facilities: Renewable energy installations, such as hydroelectric dams, may experience reduced water levels, which can impact their efficiency and output. • Wastewater treatment facilities: Drought can affect the efficiency of waste treatment processes, especially if water levels in Community Activities Vulnerability: Tourism and outdoor recreation are vulnerable to drought. Impacts: Tourism can be impacted, especially outdoor community events. Reduced water availability for irrigation may affect parks and recreational facilities, leading to degraded landscapes and limited public use. Earthquake Vulnerability: All people who live and work in Salt Lake City are vulnerable to earthquakes. Impacts: A strong earthquake disrupts every aspect of life. Residents and those who work in the city are vulnerable to loss of life and injuries. Healthcare capabilities may be overrun, and residents may be displaced from homes, with some requiring public shelter. Structures Vulnerability: Residential and all other occupancy types are vulnerable to damage. Mitigation efforts for unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings may not be complete, and these are at higher risk. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 19 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts for approximately the western two-thirds of the city, which adds additional vulnerability for damage to structures in this area. Impacts: Damage to or collapse of buildings is likely. Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses in Salt Lake City are vulnerable to earthquakes. Impacts: Salt Lake City is an economic hub in the Intermountain West. Businesses may experience direct losses through structural damage, or they may be unable to operate due to damage and disruption to transportation and utility networks. Commerce may shut down for an undetermined amount of time, and businesses may close permanently or move out of the area to restart in a safer location. There could be a decline in tourism, and food and supply access may Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: The Capitol and Temple Square have been retrofitted, but other historic buildings and monuments may still be vulnerable. There are 230 sites on the National Register of Historic Places located in Salt Lake City that are vulnerable to damage from earthquakes. Impacts: Many of the historic structures in Salt Lake City may be severely damaged or destroyed by an earthquake due to their age and construction, which lack seismic building standards. Cultural Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: All facilities and infrastructure are vulnerable to earthquakes. Refineries, hospitals, police and fire stations, water plants, power plants, roads/transportation, bus and rail transit systems, communication systems, prison, inland port, airport, federal reserve bank, bike lanes, sewer systems, and schools are all vulnerable. Impacts: Damage to emergency response facilities and vehicles may delay response and contribute to the vulnerability of residents. All infrastructure systems may also be damaged, and services may be interrupted due to ground shaking. Some facilities or systems may have higher vulnerability due to age and construction standards. Disruption to these systems may inhibit emergency response and Community Activities Vulnerability: All community events and activities are vulnerable to earthquakes. Impacts: Day-to-day activities may shut down until after recovery efforts. This may affect education, recreation, business, government Extreme Heat People Vulnerability: Unsheltered populations and vulnerable groups such as the elderly, young children, those with chronic health problems, and low-income households are at higher risk. People working outdoors in hot weather are also at risk. Impacts: Unsheltered and other at-risk populations may experience heat illness such as dehydration, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. Structures Vulnerability: Older homes, cooling centers under strain, and a higher probability of structure fires are factors that increase the vulnerability of structures to extreme heat. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 20 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Impacts: Older homes are less likely to have good insulation and may not have air conditioning or other cooling systems. Prolonged heat exposure can weaken building materials, cause cracks in concrete, warp wood, and deteriorate roofing materials. Older structures within the city may be more at risk. Salt Lake City is vulnerable to urban Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses are vulnerable to extreme heat. Impacts: Businesses face increased energy costs and reduced worker productivity in outdoor projects/work. There is increased demand on climate-controlled products. Some businesses may see Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Parks and open spaces, air quality, and increased wildfire risk are vulnerable to extreme heat. Impacts: Air quality may be negatively affected. Extreme heat can dry out vegetation and increase the risk of wildland fires. Parks and open spaces may experience a decline in vegetation health and lose their appeal. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Power utilities, healthcare facilities, and transportation networks are vulnerable to extreme heat. Impacts: There is a strain on utility systems to meet increased power demands. Hospitals and healthcare facilities may experience a surge in heat-related illnesses or injuries. Roadways and rails can buckle or warp due to extreme heat. In Salt Lake City, I-15, I-80, Highway 201, Bangerter Highway, State Street/US 89, Redwood Road, Trax, FrontRunner, airport runways, and numerous other transportation routes are vulnerable to heat Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor events and tourism are vulnerable to extreme heat. Impacts: Decreased tourism. Outdoor events and activities may need to be postponed or canceled due to heat risks. Farmers’ markets, outdoor sporting events, and concerts are vulnerable to these cancellations, leading to lost revenue. Parks, hiking trails, and other Extreme Cold People Vulnerability: Extreme cold can affect all Salt Lake City residents. The elderly, children, low-income households, and unhoused individuals face a higher risk. Impacts: People are vulnerable to hypothermia and frostbite with prolonged exposure to extreme cold. Low-income households may struggle with increased heating costs for homes and buildings. Those Structures Vulnerability: Older homes, mobile homes, commercial spaces, and unheated structures are vulnerable to extreme cold. Impacts: • Older homes: Many older homes may not have adequate insulation or might have outdated heating systems. This makes them less efficient in retaining heat, leading to cold drafts and higher heating costs. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 21 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts • Mobile homes: Many mobile homes may not be built with the same insulation standards as permanent structures, making them more vulnerable to cold weather. • Commercial and industrial buildings: Structures used for storage or manufacturing that are not properly insulated can be at risk, especially if they are not occupied regularly and the heating is Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses in Salt Lake City are vulnerable. Impacts: • Agriculture and landscaping: Cold temperatures can damage crops, especially sensitive varieties like fruits and vegetables. Seasonal changes can affect the landscaping industry, which relies on mild temperatures for planting and maintenance. • Construction: Cold weather can halt construction projects or slow progress. Concrete curing rates, material performance, and worker safety are all impacted by low temperatures, leading to delays and increased costs. • Manufacturing: Factories that rely on outdoor processes or shipping might face operational difficulties. Extreme cold can affect machinery performance and the supply chain, leading to potential financial losses. • Retail and hospitality: Businesses in these sectors may suffer from decreased foot traffic during extremely cold weather. Customers are less likely to venture out, impacting sales in shops, restaurants, and hotels. • Transportation and logistics: Cold weather can lead to hazardous road conditions and disruptions in public transport. This can affect the timely delivery of goods and services, impacting overall economic productivity. • Energy supply and utilities: Cold weather increases the demand for heating, which can strain energy resources. Infrastructure like power lines and gas pipelines can be vulnerable to freezing temperatures, leading to potential outages. • Tourism and recreation: Although some winter sports benefit from cold weather, extreme cold can deter tourists, affecting local businesses that rely on seasonal visitors. Ski resorts, for example, may face fewer visitors if temperatures drop severely. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Vegetation, wildlife, water systems, and historical, archaeological, and cultural sites are vulnerable to extreme cold. Impacts: • Vegetation: Some plant species, especially non-native or sensitive flora, may struggle to survive extreme cold temperatures. • Wildlife: Certain animal species that are not well adapted to extreme cold could face challenges in finding food and shelter during harsh winters. • Water bodies: Streams and ponds can freeze over, affecting aquatic ecosystems. This can disrupt habitats for fish and other aquatic life, along with impacting local recreational activities. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 22 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts • Historic buildings: Older buildings or structures constructed without modern materials may be more susceptible to damage from extreme cold. Issues such as frozen pipes, roof collapses due to heavy snow, and structural damage from temperature fluctuations can occur. • Archeological sites: Sites that lack proper preservation methods may face degradation or damage during extreme frost and thaw cycles, which can alter soil structures and expose artifacts. • Cultural artifacts: Items in museums or community centers, especially those made from organic materials like wood or textiles, can be damaged by extreme cold if not properly climate- controlled. • Outdoor public art: Sculptures and installations might experience damage from freezing temperatures and ice formation, which can compromise their integrity. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Transportation networks are vulnerable to extreme cold. Impacts: Access to essential services could be disrupted. Community Activities Vulnerability: Cultural events are vulnerable to extreme cold. Impacts: Cultural events and practices may be delayed or canceled. Cold weather can impact community events, festivals, and traditions that rely on outdoor spaces, limiting public engagement and cultural expression. Flooding People Vulnerability: Residents near flood hazard zones along the Jordan River, City Creek, Red Butte Creek, Emigration Creek, Parleys Creek, and other waterways are vulnerable. Low-lying areas may also experience localized flooding during heavy rain events. Impacts: Flooding can damage homes and displace residents. Individuals without reliable transportation may struggle to evacuate quickly, while low-income families often lack resources for flood- prevention measures. The elderly and those with disabilities may face mobility challenges, increasing their risk during emergencies. Flooding can occur in areas of the city where storm drains cannot keep up with heavy rain events (such as the Ballpark area near 1300 South). Flooding can lead to the spread of disease or other health risks from contaminated water. The unsheltered population along the river is vulnerable to illness and injury. Structures Vulnerability: Homes, commercial buildings, businesses, and other structures near flood zones or low-lying areas are vulnerable to flooding. Impacts: Residential properties in floodplains and commercial buildings without proper drainage systems or flood-resistant designs face significant risks of damage during heavy rain or snowmelt. Older structures may be more susceptible due to outdated construction standards. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Commercial properties, especially retail centers and warehouses near rivers or low-lying areas, are at high risk during heavy rainfall. The Inland Port is at risk. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 23 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Impacts: Businesses in flooded areas can experience significant losses from flood damage to structures or inventory. Residential developments in flood-prone zones can also suffer damage, which can influence property values. Public infrastructure, such as roads and utilities, may experience disruptions, leading to costly repairs, which may affect businesses’ ability to operate and contribute to revenue losses. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Streams, parks, and historic structures are vulnerable to flooding. Impacts: Natural areas like wetlands and streams are at risk of habitat destruction. Flooding can contribute to an increase in mosquito populations. Cultural resources, such as parks and public spaces, can become unusable, and parks may be damaged beyond repair. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Sewer and water systems, transportation networks, and the prison facility are vulnerable to flooding. Impacts: Sewer and water systems may be overwhelmed. The prison may be impacted. Roadways may be washed out or blocked by debris, which may disrupt emergency services or isolate Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor events and recreation are vulnerable to flooding. Impacts: Events may be postponed until waters recede, or they may be canceled. Flooding can cause damage to parks and gathering Landslide/ Slope Failure People Vulnerability: Homes along the northern and eastern sides of the city are built in the foothills and could be damaged or destroyed by landslides. Impacts: Loss of homes would temporarily displace residents. In the Structures Vulnerability: Residences and other structures along the benches/slopes on the northern and eastern borders of the city are vulnerable to landslides. Impacts: Earth movement can cause extensive damage to structures. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses near slopes are vulnerable to landslides. Impacts: Businesses may experience a loss of property and disruption to their operations. Businesses not directly on slopes may experience indirect effects if major transportation routes are blocked or damaged. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Vegetation and wildlife, soil and water resources, and historic and cultural sites are vulnerable to landslides. Impacts: • Vegetation: Forests and other plant life can be affected as landslides may uproot trees and destabilize habitats. • Wildlife habitats: Landslides may displace or harm species that depend on specific habitats. • Soil and water resources: Landslides can lead to soil erosion, affecting agricultural lands and water quality in streams and rivers. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 24 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts • Landmarks and historic sites: Landslides pose a significant threat to historic sites, causing structural damage and risking the loss of unique cultural heritage. They can block access, negatively impacting tourism and local economies and creating safety hazards that may lead to site closures. The financial burden of repairs can compete with other community needs, and alterations to the landscape can diminish a site’s historical significance. Sites such as Red Butte Gardens, This is the Place State Park, Hogle Zoo, Memory Grove, the Natural History Museum, and other resources near the foothills may be vulnerable to landslides. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Transportation routes and refineries are vulnerable to landslides. Impacts: Emigration Canyon Road, I-80, I-15, Victory Road/Beck Street, and smaller neighborhood roads could be damaged or blocked. The University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer, and Primary Children’s hospitals may be at risk of damage or limited access if roadways are blocked by landslides. Community Activities Vulnerability: The city is situated against a backdrop of steep, mountainous terrain composed of sedimentary rocks that can be prone to erosion and instability. Heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt can saturate the soil, increasing the likelihood of landslides, especially in areas where vegetation has been removed or where construction has altered the natural landscape. Urban development and infrastructure projects often disturb the natural slope stability, leading to increased runoff and weakened soil structures. In addition, seismic activity in the region poses an added threat, as earthquakes can trigger landslides. Impacts: Community events and activities may be disrupted by landslides. Radon People Vulnerability: A range of 5% to 50% of homes tested in Salt Lake City have dangerous levels of radon gas. According to UtahRadon.org, an average of 40% of homes have dangerous levels. Impacts: Radon causes lung cancer. All people can be exposed either at work or home. There is a lack of widespread testing in homes and businesses. Structures Vulnerability: Radon can enter buildings, especially those with basements or crawl spaces. Geological formations in the area can contribute to higher radon levels, and older homes often lack modern radon-resistant features. In addition, the climate can create pressure differences that allow radon to infiltrate buildings, while poor ventilation can lead to elevated indoor levels. Impacts: The cost of remediation may discourage people from taking mitigation action. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses and personal or household budgets are vulnerable to the effects of radon. Impacts: The costs of remediation and healthcare for long-term side effects can be significant. Natural, Historic, and Vulnerability: Historic and other older structures are vulnerable to radon. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 25 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Cultural Resources Impacts: outdated construction methods, and environmental conditions. The area’s uranium-rich geology produces radon gas, which can seep into older buildings constructed with local materials that lack modern mitigation techniques. Poor ventilation in many historic structures allows radon to accumulate, particularly in tightly sealed environments, during colder months. In addition, the region’s topography can trap radon, increasing risks for nearby properties. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Radon can enter hospitals, police and fire stations, schools, and other city facilities. Impacts: Employees and other occupants may be exposed to radon. The region has uranium-rich rocks, especially in the Wasatch Range, which produce radon gas that can seep into buildings through cracks and gaps. Certain soil types have high levels of uranium, contributing to indoor radon accumulation, particularly in poorly ventilated older structures. In addition, Salt Lake City’s elevation can affect how radon escapes from the ground, while construction activities might disturb soil and release trapped gas. Vulnerability: Community activities have limited vulnerability to radon exposure. Heavy Rain People Vulnerability: Areas of the city where storm drains cannot keep up with heavy rain events (such as the Ballpark area) and the unsheltered population along the river are vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: People can be injured by flash flooding following heavy rain. Structures Vulnerability: Structures in low-lying areas or near flood hazard zones are vulnerable are vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: Basement flooding is a concern for residential homes. People may not have flood insurance to make repairs. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses in low-lying or flood-prone areas are vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: Local businesses may need to reduce operations or close Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Vegetation in parks and open spaces is vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: Local vegetation could be inundated, impacting plant growth. Heavy rain can contribute to soil erosion. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Emergency response services are vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: Disruption to essential services and potential access issues Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor events and recreation are vulnerable to heavy rain. Impacts: High Wind People Vulnerability: The entire city is vulnerable to high winds. Impacts: People can be injured by blowing debris or falling tree limbs. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 26 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Structures Vulnerability: Structures throughout the city are vulnerable to high winds. Mobile homes are at higher risk. Impacts: High wind can cause structural damage across the board, including damage to landscaping damage and personal property, such as broken windows and roof damage. Homes and businesses can be damaged by fallen trees. Four mobile home parks in western Salt Lake City are at heightened risk due to their inability to withstand Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses are vulnerable to high winds. Impacts: High winds can damage structures and inventory, or disrupt power and communication infrastructure necessary for businesses to operate. Debris may block roads, and employees may be unable to Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: The city’s location in a valley, surrounded by mountains, can create funneling effects that intensify wind gusts. Trees, vegetation, and historic and cultural sites are vulnerable to high winds. Impacts: High winds can lead to potential damage to trees and vegetation, disrupting ecosystems and altering landscapes. Historic buildings and cultural sites may suffer structural strain, as high winds can accelerate wear and tear on aging materials, such as wood and masonry. In addition, debris carried by strong winds can pose risks to both natural areas and human-made structures, leading to erosion or even the destruction of significant historical artifacts. Salt Lake City has many mature trees that can be uprooted by high winds. These trees can contribute to damage in parks and open spaces, as well as cause structural damage. Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Power, communication, and transportation infrastructure are all vulnerable to high winds. All critical facilities are at risk if these lifelines are disrupted. Impacts: Utility infrastructure, such as power lines and communications towers, can be damaged by high winds and are vulnerable to service outages. Power and communication outages can disrupt emergency response and medical care. Falling tree branches and other debris can block access to properties and may block roadways. Power is essential for life-sustaining equipment at Community Activities Vulnerability: The area’s geography, located at the foot of the Wasatch Mountains, creates a channeling effect that can exacerbate wind speeds. In addition, many outdoor events and gatherings may be set up in open spaces, making them susceptible to sudden gusts. Impacts: Structures commonly used in festivals and public events, such as tents, canopies, and stages, have limited resistance to high winds, leading to safety concerns and potential damage. Furthermore, local foliage, including trees and shrubs, may not provide sufficient windbreaks, resulting in an increased risk of debris being blown around, thus posing hazards to participants. Lightning People Vulnerability: Salt Lake City experiences summer thunderstorms, which can produce significant lightning activity. Lightning can occur SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 27 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts vulnerable to injury from lightning. The area’s geographical features, including the presence of mountains and open plains, can create conditions conducive to lightning strikes. In addition, outdoor recreational activities are popular in this area, and many residents and visitors may spend time in exposed locations, such as parks, hiking trails, or golf courses, during thunderstorms. Impacts: A lightning strike can cause serious injury or death to people in close proximity to the strike. People outdoors in open areas may struggle to find shelter quickly, particularly in fast-moving Structures Vulnerability: Structures anywhere in Salt Lake City are vulnerable. Impacts: Fire is a possibility if structures are struck by lightning. Salt Lake City has many taller buildings that may be more vulnerable to lightning strikes if not properly grounded or equipped with proper lightning protection systems. Electrical surges may disrupt power, internet, and communication systems within homes and businesses. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Salt Lake City has many major businesses that are vulnerable to losses from power and communication disruptions caused by lightning. Impacts: First, the city’s geography and climate create conditions conducive to thunderstorms, particularly during summer. This increases the risk of lightning strikes that can damage infrastructure, such as power lines, communication systems, and buildings. In addition, the concentration of economic activities in urban areas makes them more susceptible to disruption from such natural events. Industries reliant on technology and continuous operations, such as data centers and manufacturing plants, may face significant financial Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Parks, cultural sites, and historic sites are vulnerable to lightning. Impacts: There is a risk of wildfire from lightning in foothills and City Creek Canyon. Salt Lake City has multiple parks and open spaces with mature trees and monuments that can attract lightning due to their height and thus may be damaged. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Power and communication infrastructure and emergency response systems are vulnerable. Impacts: Power lines and substations are susceptible, and lightning strikes can lead to power outages. Power outages can disrupt essential functions of emergency facilities, hospitals, and schools. Lightning strikes could impact communications within buildings and affect emergency responders. Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor recreation sites such as Memory Grove, Hogle Zoo, Sugar House Park, Liberty Park, and Red Butte Garden, golf courses such as Bonneville and Glendale, as well as numerous smaller parks, are exposed to lightning Impacts: Lightning can lead to the cancellation of community events. Severe Winter People Vulnerability: All of Salt Lake City is potentially vulnerable to severe winter weather. The eastern benches often see higher snow accumulations and residents there may have a higher risk. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 28 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Impacts: The unsheltered population is vulnerable to exposure or hypothermia. Individuals may be stranded away from home or in their vehicles. Medical issues from shoveling heavy snow are possible, particularly for the elderly. People may underestimate the potential danger of winter weather warnings. People are at risk of injuries from Structures Vulnerability: Older homes and structures throughout Salt Lake City are vulnerable to severe winter weather. Impacts: Heavy snow loads on roofs can cause damage. Older homes in Salt Lake City might have weakened roofs or inadequate Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses throughout Salt Lake City are vulnerable to severe winter weather. Impacts: Businesses can experience significant losses from decreased customer traffic and delayed shipments. Transportation and logistics companies, such as the Inland Port, are particularly vulnerable, as snow can hinder vehicle movement, leading to delivery delays. Construction projects may face delays and increased costs. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and historic and cultural sites are vulnerable to severe winter weather. Impacts: The area’s unique topography, characterized by its mountains and valleys, can lead to intense snowfall and create development patterns that concentrate snow accumulation in certain areas. This accumulation can damage delicate ecosystems, disrupt wildlife habitats, and lead to soil erosion as the snow melts. Historic structures and cultural sites, many of which are older and may not be equipped to handle severe weather, can suffer damage from heavy snow loads that may compromise roofs and other structural elements. In addition, the weight of accumulated snow can cause falling branches and trees, posing risks to both natural landscapes and human-made structures. Salt Lake City has 230 sites on the National Register of Historic Places. Culturally significant artifacts and sites can be affected by harsh winter conditions, as prolonged exposure to moisture and freezing Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Power infrastructure and transportation networks are vulnerable to severe winter weather. Impacts: An increase in traffic accidents can strain emergency services. Additionally, communication issues, loss of power from falling trees and snow loads, increased demand for snow removal, and increased demand on drainage systems during snowmelt are possible. I-15 and I-80, as well as other major routes like State Street, Redwood Road, and Highway 201, may experience delays or closures during winter storms. FrontRunner, Trax, and other transit systems may also be delayed. Community Activities Vulnerability: Activities and events throughout the city and region are vulnerable to disruption from severe winter weather. Impacts: Significant winter snowfall can create hazardous conditions, disrupt transportation, and lead to cancellations of outdoor events, SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 29 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts cause power outages, which can complicate indoor gatherings. Many residents may prioritize safety, resulting in lower attendance at events. In addition, infrastructure challenges such as snow removal hinder mobility, making it difficult for community members to participate. Tornado Vulnerability: Tornadoes are uncommon in Utah, but they have occurred in Salt Lake City. The entire city is potentially vulnerable to tornadoes, and all populations are potentially at risk. Impacts: People are at risk of injury or death if a tornado occurs. The region’s unique geography can foster severe weather, while a lack of public awareness and preparedness leaves residents ill-equipped to respond. Unlike tornado-prone areas, there is no established response culture, leading to delays in seeking shelter. In addition, urban infrastructure poses risks because flying debris can endanger lives. Limited access to timely weather alerts also hinders effective communication, making it essential for residents to stay informed and proactive about safety measures. Structures Vulnerability: All structures, particularly older buildings and mobile homes, are vulnerable to tornadoes. Impacts: The region’s sudden temperature shifts and unique geography can contribute to the formation of tornadoes, while many buildings may not be designed to withstand such extreme weather events. Older constructions, in particular, might lack modern reinforcements and building codes that enhance storm resistance. In addition, large trees and open spaces can increase wind speed and debris hazards, making the impact of tornadoes even more severe for nearby structures. Four mobile home parks in western Salt Lake City Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses are vulnerable to tornadoes. Impacts: Several economic assets are vulnerable to tornadoes, including commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and critical infrastructure, such as power lines and transportation networks. These assets are at risk due to their construction materials and designs, which may not be fortified against high winds. In addition, densely populated areas can lead to significant damage and economic disruption if a tornado strikes, impacting local businesses and essential services. The region’s relatively low experience with tornadoes may mean that preparation and response measures are Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Parks, mature trees, historic sites, and cultural resources are vulnerable to tornadoes. Impacts: Natural resources, like trees in local parks, may be uprooted or damaged, disrupting local ecosystems. Historic sites, such as the Salt Lake City and County Building and the Utah State Capitol, are at risk due to their age and structural integrity, which may not withstand strong winds. Cultural resources, including festivals and community gatherings held outdoors, could be disrupted, posing risks to public safety. The vulnerability of these resources is primarily due to their physical location and construction if they lack the reinforcement SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 30 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Critical facilities and infrastructure that are vulnerable to tornadoes include hospitals, schools, power plants, and communication centers. Impacts: These structures may be compromised due to their large flat roofs that can easily be uplifted by high winds and their proximity to densely populated areas, which increases the risk of damage and casualties. In addition, utility lines and transport networks, such as highways, can become disconnected or obstructed, hindering emergency response efforts. Community Activities Vulnerability: Community activities like outdoor concerts, sports games, and festivals are vulnerable to tornadoes due to their large crowds and open locations. Impacts: Tornadoes can develop quickly, leaving little time for attendees to find shelter. In addition, local infrastructure, such as schools and parks, may lack adequate tornado shelters or emergency plans. Wildfire People Vulnerability: Wildfire risk is moderate to high in the Wasatch foothills along the northern and eastern areas of the city. Open space in the western area of the city toward Great Salt Lake is also vulnerable. Impacts: Wildfire can cause injury or death for those unable to reach safety from flames. Residents may be temporarily displaced due to evacuations or displaced long term if homes are destroyed. Residents near the wildland–urban interface (WUI), individuals with physical disabilities or health issues who may struggle to evacuate, and low-income families lacking resources for fire safety measures may be vulnerable. Older adults might have reduced mobility, making them more dependent on others for assistance. People with respiratory conditions may experience negative impacts from poor air quality due to wildfire smoke. Structures Vulnerability: All structures near the WUI are vulnerable to wildfires. Impacts: Property loss, especially residences made of wood or in heavily vegetated areas, may be vulnerable. Properties near the WUI are at higher risk due to surrounding flammable vegetation. Inadequate defensible space, such as insufficient clearing of dry grass and shrubs, increases susceptibility. Roofs made of combustible materials and buildings that lack fire-resistant features Economic Assets Vulnerability: All businesses are vulnerable to wildfires, including the cost to government agencies. Impacts: Commercial assets, such as retail centers close to forested regions, can suffer damage from flames and smoke, affecting the local economy. Vital infrastructure, such as power lines and water pipelines, can be disrupted, causing further economic repercussions. The cost of firefighting efforts and its impact on government agencies’ total budgets can be significant. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Vegetation and wildfire habitats, watershed, recreation sites, and the Hogle Zoo are vulnerable to wildfires. Impacts: Natural resources like forests are at risk because dry vegetation and accumulated brush can ignite easily. Vegetation and SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 31 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts areas may be unusable for recreation, such as hiking, for a long time. Retardant drops can impact the watershed. The increasing frequency of drought and extreme heat, exacerbated by climate change, Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: Water treatment plants in the WUI, utilities, communication towers, watershed, and the prison are vulnerable to wildfires. Impacts: Water treatment facilities can be damaged by fire, and water quality in the city’s watershed can be impacted. Utilities like power lines and gas pipelines also are at risk, as sparks or falling trees can Community Activities Vulnerability: Outdoor recreation is vulnerable to wildfires. Impacts: Community activities like hiking, camping, and outdoor events are vulnerable to wildfires due to the city’s proximity to natural landscapes. High summer temperatures, low humidity, and invasive plants, such as cheatgrass, increase fire risks. Activities involving campfires or barbecuing can spark fires, and urban infrastructure, such as power lines, can ignite surrounding vegetation. Dam Failure People Vulnerability: As shown in the Dam Failure inundation area maps, several large areas in Salt Lake City are potentially vulnerable to dam failure. Six high hazard dams and three significant hazard dams are within the city limits, and three more high hazard dams outside the city have the potential to cause damage within the city. Much of the city east of the Jordan River, west of Foothill Boulevard, and south of 600 South is within a potential inundation zone. High hazard dams in the city include the following: Rotary Glen, Salt Lake County Federal Heights (#1a), Salt Lake County Shriners #12, Salt Lake County Chandler Drive #13, Ensign Downs Db, and Salt Lake County Sugarhouse; high hazard dams outside the city are Little Dell, Mountain Dell, and Red Butte. Impacts: Residents in low-lying areas downstream, the elderly, children, and those with mobility issues may struggle to evacuate quickly. Communities with limited resources, particularly low-income neighborhoods, often lack adequate support and awareness of dam- related risks. Individuals may be injured if caught in fast-moving water or may be displaced if their homes are damaged by flooding. Structures Vulnerability: Structures vulnerable to dam failure include residential neighborhoods, commercial buildings, and other structures in dam inundation boundaries or downslope of dams. Impacts: Structures downstream of a dam can suffer extensive damage from flooding following a dam failure. Damage is often worst close to the dam site because of the volume and velocity of water released. Seismic activity in the region also poses a risk, as earthquakes could compromise dam integrity, leading to severe consequences for nearby communities. Economic Assets Vulnerability: Businesses in inundation areas are vulnerable to dam failure. Impacts: Several economic assets are vulnerable to dam failure, especially those near water bodies. Residential areas may SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 32 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts significant economic loss. Commercial properties can face damage and business interruptions. The vulnerability arises from their geographical location, the potential for rapid water flow during a dam Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Vulnerability: Waterways and riparian habitats are vulnerable to dam failure. Historic and cultural sites are also at risk from flooding. Impacts: The Jordan River, creeks, and surrounding wetlands could experience significant flooding, disrupting ecosystems and water quality. Historic sites in downtown and nearby heritage landmarks may suffer extensive damage, threatening their cultural significance. The risks arise from the proximity of these resources to dam infrastructure, inadequate flood defenses, and the potential for rapid water release, which could overwhelm protections and lead to serious consequences for the environment and community heritage. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Vulnerability: One emergency operations center (EOC), 4 fire stations, 2 hospitals, and 24 schools are vulnerable to dam failure due to their location within dam inundation boundaries in Salt Lake City. Big Cottonwood and Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plants are vulnerable to dam failure in those canyons, although they are outside the city boundaries and are operated by Salt Lake City Public Utilities. Impacts: Public safety facilities, such as police and fire stations, may become inaccessible during flooding, complicating emergency response efforts. This poses risks to residential and commercial zones and disrupts critical services. Dam failure could damage transportation infrastructure, such as highways and bridges. I-15, I- 80, and numerous arterial roads and transit lines in Salt Lake City are vulnerable to flooding or other damage from a dam failure. Urban development in flood-prone areas further increases these Community Activities Vulnerability: Recreation and community events are vulnerable to dam failure. Impacts: Community activities vulnerable to dam failure include recreational activities like boating, fishing, and hiking near reservoirs and rivers. Residential areas downstream are at risk of flooding, impacting homeowners and emergency services. The city’s water supply and agricultural activities that rely on controlled water release can be disrupted. These vulnerabilities stem from urban development in flood-prone areas, aging infrastructure, and potential climate changes affecting water levels and dam safety. Civil People Bodily harm to people. Structures Damage to structures, inability to access structures, government buildings are often the target, fire. Economic Cost of response, business closure, looting of businesses. Natural, Cultural resources have become the target of protest. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 33 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Cultural Resources Critical Facilities and Infrastructure The City Public Safety Building has been the target, shutting down dispatch and the Capitol. Community Activities Postponed until disturbance is over. Cyberattack People Inability to access digital information. Economic Loss of data, hardware, cost of response (ransom). Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Misinformation. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Communications issues, inability to operate water treatment plants and wastewater. Community Activities Community activities like local government services, online event ticketing, and educational institutions are particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks. Outdated software and insufficient cybersecurity measures in government and nonprofit organizations can lead to data breaches and fraud. In addition, remote learning platforms can be targets for phishing attacks due to weak security protocols. Overall, limited resources and increasing reliance on digital systems Hazardous Materials Incident (Transporta- tion & Fixed People Health concerns, shelter in place, relocation, sheltering. Structures Contamination, decontamination, destruction of structures. Economic Impact on food supplies. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Impact on watershed and air quality. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Impact on transportation. Community Cancellation of events. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 34 Salt Lake City Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts Health Epidemic/ Pandemic People Fear/panic. Several groups are particularly vulnerable during public health epidemics and pandemics. Individuals with pre-existing health conditions, such as asthma or diabetes, and older adults with weakened immune systems face higher risks of severe illness. Low- income individuals and those without health insurance often lack access to healthcare and vaccinations, increasing their vulnerability. In addition, marginalized communities may experience language barriers and distrust in the healthcare system, further hindering their ability to seek assistance. Socioeconomic status, health conditions, and access to care significantly affect these populations during health Structures The blessed tents now on the shelf. Several structures are vulnerable to epidemics and pandemics. Public transportation hubs, such as the TRAX light rail and bus stations, pose high risks due to proximity among individuals. Densely populated areas, such as apartment buildings and low-income housing, often face overcrowding and limited health resources, exacerbating the spread of illness. Healthcare facilities can become overwhelmed during outbreaks if not adequately staffed. Schools and universities also gather many people, facilitating rapid disease transmission. Economic Assets Lack of toilet paper, lack of resources due to fear-purchasing, supply chain interruption. Key economic assets are vulnerable to public health epidemics and pandemics include tourism, hospitality, and retail. These sectors rely heavily on human interaction and can suffer from decreased consumer confidence, leading to lower foot traffic in shops and restaurants. Healthcare facilities, while critical during a crisis, may become overwhelmed, impacting their economic contributions. In addition, local events that draw large crowds are at risk of cancelation or postponement. This reliance on a service-oriented economy can lead to job losses and reduced working hours, amplifying the broader Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Natural spaces like parks may see reduced access due to health guidelines, impacting community well-being. Historic sites, such as the Salt Lake Temple and local museums, rely on visitor interactions; closures during epidemics can hinder preservation efforts and financial support. Cultural resources such as festivals and community events may be canceled, disrupting social cohesion. Critical Facilities and Infrastructure Increased demand on hospitals, decreased use of mass transit (trains, busses, planes). Community Activities Cancellation of events and social distance. Large gatherings at sporting events, concerts, and festivals are particularly vulnerable to public health epidemics due to crowded conditions, facilitating disease transmission. Other at-risk areas include community centers hosting group classes and public SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 35 Hazard Vulnerable Asset Description of Vulnerability and Impacts festivals and farmers’ markets also pose risks, as they involve shared food handling. Terrorism People Fear, loss of life, mis/disinformation, targeting of specific populations/phobias, not just a foreign issue. Minority religious or ethnic communities often face higher risks of prejudice. Individuals involved in social justice movements or expressing controversial political views also can be targeted. In addition, large public gatherings create opportunities for potential attacks, increasing attendees’ vulnerability. Overall, visibility, beliefs, and social engagement contribute to the risks faced by these groups. Structures Could be the target of terrorism. Several structures are vulnerable to terrorism due to their symbolic significance and high accessibility. The Utah State Capitol and the Conference Center of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are prime targets, representing governance and faith and often hosting large gatherings. In addition, transportation hubs such as Salt Lake City International Airport have high foot traffic, increasing the potential for significant casualties. This combination of visibility, public access, and the potential for mass impact contributes to their Economic Assets Commerce shut down. Natural, Historic, and Cultural Resources Could be the target. Key sites, such as the Salt Lake Temple and the Utah State Capitol, are significant due to their architectural and cultural importance, making them potential targets, especially given their visibility and accessibility to large crowds. Natural resources like the Great Salt Lake carry risks, as attacks could disrupt local ecology and community life. Events such as the Sundance Film Festival attract Critical Facilities and Infrastructure It could be the target, which would impact the entire population. Critical facilities vulnerable to terrorism include government buildings, transportation hubs like the airport and TRAX light rail, and large public venues such as the Salt Palace Convention Center. Their high profile and accessibility make them attractive targets. In addition, utility infrastructures, such as water treatment plants and power grids, Community Activities Cancellation of events. Large public gatherings, such as festivals, parades, and sporting events, attract crowds and media attention. Places of worship and cultural events may be targets due to their ideological significance. Their vulnerability stems from their open nature, high emotional impact, and often limited security measures. Public transit hubs and tourist attractions also are at risk due to concentrated crowds and unpredictable movement, making effective monitoring challenging. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 36 Salt Lake City Jurisdiction-Specific Changes in Vulnerability Hazard events can impact communities, infrastructures, and ecosystems. The severity of these impacts can be influenced by climate change, population patterns, and land use developments. Understanding these factors is crucial for Salt Lake City to develop a resilient community and minimize the impacts of hazards. Table 13 displays the unique changes within the community and the related effects on each identified hazard affecting Salt Lake City. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 37 Table 13: Jurisdiction-Specific Changes in Vulnerability in Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability Higher temperatures can lead to more rain, destabilizing snowpack and increasing the risk of wet avalanches. In addition, changes in snowfall can cause denser snow layering on slopes, making them more prone to sliding. Avalanches can influence population patterns by deterring people from moving to or remaining in high-risk areas, leading to decreased density in these locations. The threat of avalanches prompts many to seek safer environments in urban or lower-risk regions. In addition, when avalanches occur, they can disrupt infrastructure, causing residents to relocate. Areas at high risk may face restrictions on new construction and require costly safety measures, which can deter development and shift growth to safer locations. Increased awareness of avalanche hazards may lead local governments to implement stricter zoning laws, affecting recreational and tourism opportunities in mountainous regions. Decreased Drought Climate change affects drought incidents by altering precipitation patterns and increasing temperatures. Warmer weather can lead to longer dry periods and more severe droughts, while changes in rainfall can reduce snowpack in nearby mountains, crucial for summer water supply. Higher temperatures also increase evaporation rates, further straining local water resources. Drought can significantly influence population patterns by impacting economic opportunities and the quality of life. Water scarcity often leads to reduced agricultural productivity, prompting residents to migrate to areas with more stable job prospects. Increased water costs can make living less affordable, driving some residents away. Conversely, efforts to address drought, such as sustainable development or improved water management, may attract newcomers, resulting in changes in the community’s demographic composition over time. Drought can significantly impact land use and development by reducing water availability, leading to shifts in agricultural practices. Farmers may switch to drought-resistant crops or repurpose land for more profitable ventures, prompting urban development as people seek water-secure areas. This increased demand may drive local governments to adjust zoning laws and promote sustainable practices in new projects. As a result, prolonged drought conditions can reshape the area’s landscape and influence future development trends. Increased Earthquake Rising temperatures can lead to glacial melting, which affects Earthquakes can significantly alter population patterns by Earthquakes can alter land use and development by leading to Stayed the same SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 38 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability may trigger seismic activity through isostatic rebound. In addition, increased rainfall and flooding can erode soils, weakening structural integrity and heightening vulnerability during earthquakes. Although the direct links between climate change and earthquakes are still under investigation, environmental effects may This migration can lead to changes in population density and attract new residents and businesses during the rebuilding process. The perception of the area as a safe place to live may shift, impacting long-term demographics, as some residents return to rebuild while others relocate permanently. damaged areas might be rezoned for different uses, and development may accelerate in certain neighborhoods. Extreme Heat Climate change significantly impacts extreme heat by increasing the frequency and intensity of heat waves. Rising global temperatures lead to longer and hotter summers, affecting residents and local infrastructure while heightening health risks, especially for vulnerable populations. Urban heat islands from reduced vegetation and extensive pavement further amplify these effects. By causing residents to relocate due to damaged homes or safety concerns. Some may move to areas perceived as safer or seek better job opportunities elsewhere. The economic impact and infrastructure damage can also make certain neighborhoods less desirable, leading to shifts in demographics and the socioeconomic landscape as new residents with different backgrounds move in. Rising temperatures may lead urban planners to adopt heat mitigation strategies, such as increasing green spaces and using reflective materials. Zoning regulations might shift to promote mixed-use developments that enhance walkability and reduce vehicle reliance during peak heat. As concerns about heat-related health risks grow, there may be greater demand for improvements like shaded sidewalks and cooling centers, influencing future development toward resilience and sustainability. Increased Extreme Cold By increasing the intensity of winter storms. Higher atmospheric temperatures allow for more moisture, resulting in heavier snowfall and potentially lower temperatures during these events. In addition, fluctuations By driving some residents to relocate to warmer areas. Harsh winters can hinder economic activities and deter new residents and businesses, influencing housing demand and the attractiveness of certain Extreme cold can impact land use and development by shifting priorities toward indoor facilities like shopping centers and community spaces, as outdoor activities are curtailed. Developers may focus on energy- Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 39 Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability seasonal cycles, leading to unpredictable periods of extreme cold mixed with warmer spells. income families, leading to changes in demographics and socioeconomic stratification in the community. can lead to increased construction costs and adjusted project timelines. Flooding the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and alter precipitation patterns. They lead to more intense rainstorms and accelerated snowmelt from nearby mountains, raising water levels in rivers and streams. This combination raises the risk of flooding, especially in areas with inadequate drainage and urban development in flood- prone zones, heightening the potential for damage to homes and infrastructure. population patterns by displacing residents from affected areas, leading them to seek shelter elsewhere. This may cause a population decline where flooding occurs, as individuals might hesitate to return due to ongoing risks or property damage. As neighborhoods become less desirable, people may migrate to safer areas, changing demographic trends and putting pressure on housing in those regions. Over time, these shifts can influence urban planning and development, as local governments address flooding risks and changing population needs. for construction due to flood risks, planners may prioritize higher ground and impose stricter zoning laws, such as requiring elevated structures. This results in a more resilient urban landscape but may also limit growth and raise property values in safer areas. Landslide/ Slope Failure Climate change increases the risk of landslides through heavier rainfall and temperature fluctuations. Intense rain saturates soil, destabilizing slopes, while freeze–thaw cycles weaken the ground. Changes in vegetation can also reduce stability, leading to a higher potential for landslides. Landslides and slope failures can impact population patterns by making some areas unsafe, leading to displacement and lower property values. This prompts residents to move to safer regions, thereby increasing density in more stable areas. Concerns about future landslides may also deter newcomers from Landslides and slope failures can impact land use and development by rendering certain areas unsafe for construction. This often results in stricter zoning laws, pushing developers to focus on more stable regions. Consequently, property values may decline in affected areas, and infrastructure investments shift to increase Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 40 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability high-risk zones, shaping long- term demographic trends. toward safer locations. Radon Climate change can affect radon levels by altering soil temperatures and moisture conditions. Higher temperatures may increase radon emissions from the ground, while heavy rainfall can change groundwater and soil saturation, impacting radon migration into buildings. Radon exposure can influence population patterns as increased health awareness may drive families to move away from areas with high radon levels. This shift could particularly affect vulnerable groups, changing demographics and demand in the housing market. Homes with lower radon levels may become more sought after, and public health campaigns can encourage community action, making previously undesirable areas more attractive once mitigation measures are implemented. Radon can impact land use and development by necessitating site assessments and mitigation, which can increase costs. Developers might prioritize areas with lower radon risks and adopt designs that reduce gas infiltration. This awareness may prompt stricter building codes and zoning regulations, influencing where new projects are located and shaping community planning. Decreased Heavy Rain Climate change increases the frequency and intensity of heavy rain, as higher temperatures allow the atmosphere to hold more moisture. This leads to stronger storms, flash flooding, and overwhelmed drainage systems. Heavy rain can shift population patterns by pushing residents out of flood-prone areas and attracting them to safer neighborhoods. Frequent flooding may lead to evacuations and economic disruptions, prompting relocations. Over time, ongoing heavy rains can affect housing demand and community stability, altering the town’s population distribution. Need for adequate stormwater systems in new areas. Heavy rain can impact land use and development by altering zoning regulations to address flood risks. Previously safe areas might be deemed unsuitable for development, pushing growth to higher ground. There may also be a shift toward green infrastructure and improved drainage systems, ultimately transforming the urban landscape to enhance flood Increased High Wind Climate change affects high winds by altering atmospheric patterns and increasing extreme High winds can alter population patterns by making certain areas less desirable. Frequent damage Buildings need to meet building code standards to withstand expected wind events. Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 41 Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability temperatures may lead to more substantial, unpredictable winds and more frequent thunderstorms, posing risks to infrastructure and air quality. newcomers, and slow growth in affected regions. and development by necessitating stronger building codes and wind- resistant designs, which may raise construction costs. Areas prone to wind damage might see decreased property values, leading to reduced investment. In addition, high winds can cause erosion and harm vegetation, prompting town planners to prioritize open spaces and green infrastructure, ultimately altering Lightning Climate change increases temperatures and alters precipitation, leading to more intense thunderstorms and frequent lightning strikes. Urbanization can enhance this effect, posing risks to public safety and infrastructure. Lightning can influence population patterns by causing property damage and wildfires, leading some residents to relocate. Areas with higher lightning activity may deter new residents, while safer locations could increase migration as people seek protection from severe weather. Lightning can impact land use and development by increasing risks that require careful planning. Higher insurance costs may deter developers, while infrastructure must include safety measures, such as lightning rods. As climate change causes more intense storms, urban planners may adapt zoning and building codes to enhance resilience, thereby influencing the town’s growth. Increased Severe Winter Weather Climate change impacts heavy snow and blizzards by altering precipitation patterns. Higher temperatures can lead to more rain than snow, affecting snowpack levels—additionally, increased storm intensity results in heavier, more unpredictable snowfall. increased number of people needing to get to work and quicker snow removal. Heavy snow or blizzards can impact population patterns by influencing where people live and work. Transportation disruptions may lead residents to seek plow current and future town roads. Heavy snow and blizzards can influence land use and development by necessitating infrastructure improvements, such as enhanced snow removal and drainage. Planners may prioritize SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 42 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability density in some areas while depopulating others. Families might also avoid regions with frequent heavy snowfall, shifting demand to milder areas. Over time, these trends can alter community demographics and economic activity, prompting adjustments in town planning and blizzards could deter growth in certain neighborhoods, pushing developers to seek safer locations. Over time, these changes can alter population density and reshape the urban landscape. Tornado Climate change may increase the frequency and intensity of tornadoes. Higher temperatures lead to more moisture in the air, creating conditions for severe thunderstorms. Changes in wind patterns and precipitation can also heighten tornado risks, resulting in more destructive storms and greater threats to infrastructure and communities. Tornadoes can influence population patterns by prompting residents to move to safer areas after damage occurs. This can decrease density in affected neighborhoods while increasing the demand for housing in safer regions. New residents may also move in for recovery opportunities, altering demographics. Over time, repeated tornado threats might push long-term residents to areas with better disaster preparedness, reshaping the town’s population distribution. Tornadoes can significantly alter land use and development by leading to stricter construction codes and zoning laws for resilience. Communities may invest in tornado shelters, relocate critical facilities away from high-risk areas, and create open spaces for emergency response, all while promoting economic development through sustainable practices. Increased Wildfire creating drier conditions, prolonged droughts lead to more dry vegetation, which serves as fuel for fires. Erratic seasons extend the growing period, while more lightning strikes can ignite wildfires. safer areas, shifting demographics, while declining property values might deter newcomers. Conversely, some may be drawn to rebuilding efforts, impacting long-term growth and community dynamics. resilient infrastructure and green spaces, leading to stricter building codes and encouraging development in safer areas. As wildfires increase with climate change, adapting land use is vital for community resilience. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 43 Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability threat to ecosystems and community safety. Dam Failure Climate change raises the risk of dam failure by causing heavier rainfall and rapid snowmelt. These changes can overwhelm dams and compromise their integrity, highlighting the need for urgent safety assessments and upgrades to protect communities downstream. Dam failure tornadoes can impact population patterns by displacing residents and altering demographics. Evacuations can lead to an influx in safer areas, while destruction may deter new residents and contribute to population decline. Fear of future disasters may also prompt remaining individuals to relocate, changing the community’s composition and affecting population density and economic activity. Dam failure can reshape land use and development by making areas prone to flooding unsuitable for growth. This may lead planners to focus on safer regions and implement stricter zoning laws to enhance resilience. The emphasis on sustainable practices and flood mitigation can ultimately transform the urban landscape, prioritizing disaster preparedness in future developments. Increased Civil Disturbance Climate change can increase civil disturbances by intensifying environmental stresses and social tensions. Rising temperatures may lead to droughts, wildfires, and poor air quality, particularly affecting vulnerable communities. Resource scarcity, especially water, can spark conflicts and protests. In addition, an influx of migrants from harder-hit areas may strain local resources, further escalating tensions. This cycle of unrest is driven by the impacts of climate change on the environment and community By encouraging residents to move for safety, leading to outflows and new arrivals. These events can reveal social issues, impacting community dynamics, employment, and property values, ultimately reshaping demographics, and social cohesion. By shifting community priorities toward safety and stability. Developers may hesitate to invest in troubled areas, leading to a focus on public spaces and community centers. Residents might also push for zoning changes favoring low-density housing and community-oriented efforts, prompting a reevaluation of land use strategies. Increased Cyberattack Possible attack on the industry, Cyberattacks can change Cyberattacks can impact land use Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 44 Salt Lake City Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability large amounts of greenhouse gases and burning fossil fuels. Climate change can heighten cyberattack risk by increasing vulnerabilities during extreme weather. Disruptions like power outages offer cybercriminals opportunities, but focusing on emergency responses can weaken cybersecurity measures. As organizations adopt new technologies to cope with climate impacts, they may unintentionally introduce additional vulnerabilities. Compromised systems may cause residents to leave due to safety concerns, while high- profile incidents can deter businesses, leading to job losses. This perception of vulnerability may also make the town less appealing to newcomers, resulting in demographic shifts and affecting local development. infrastructure. If essential systems are compromised, investors may be discouraged, slowing economic activity. Local governments might also redirect funds to increase cybersecurity rather than new infrastructure, altering development timelines and urban planning priorities. This can significantly reshape the town’s growth and land use. Hazardous Materials Incident (Transportation & Fixed Facility) Climate change elevates the risk of hazardous materials incidents by increasing extreme weather events like heavy rain and wildfires. These events can breach storage tanks and heighten material volatility. Vulnerable infrastructure can lead to more spills or accidents, while climate shifts may also introduce new challenges for managing hazardous substances and public health. temporary declines in density. In the long run, unsafe areas may deter new residents, affecting growth and diversity. In addition, negative perceptions can lower property values and economic prospects, leading families to relocate, which impacts local demographics. designated as hazardous sites, limiting their residential or commercial use and decreasing property values. This can drive developers to seek safer locations, altering growth patterns. Over time, such incidents may lead to new zoning regulations focused on public safety and environmental protection. Public Health Epidemic/ Pandemic By increasing the spread of vector-borne diseases and raising the risk of waterborne illnesses due to flooding or drought. Worsening air quality can also exacerbate respiratory conditions like asthma, By prompting migration for safety and better healthcare. Vulnerable groups may move to areas with improved services, while economic instability can drive people to seek new employment opportunities. In addition, By increasing the demand for healthcare facilities like hospitals and clinics. Communities may prioritize green spaces for well- being, leading to adjustments in zoning regulations and potentially fostering higher-density housing Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 45 Type of Hazard Event Effects of Climate Change Changes in Population Patterns Changes in Land Use and Development Overall Vulnerability especially in vulnerable populations. and social interactions, reshaping the community’s demographics access during health crises. Terrorism Terroristic activity is sometimes centered around climate change. Climate change impacts terrorism incidents by creating conditions of resource scarcity and social unrest. Increased competition for essential resources, such as water, can fuel tensions, making communities more vulnerable to extremist ideologies. Extreme weather events may disrupt social order and infrastructure, offering terrorist groups opportunities to exploit crises. In addition, climate-driven population displacement can heighten tensions in receiving areas, raising the risk of domestic terrorism. Law enforcement’s focus on climate- related challenges can also limit its capacity to address terrorism threats. Ultimately, while climate change may not directly cause terrorism, its effects can create an environment conducive to Terrorism incidents can alter population patterns by instilling fear and prompting residents to relocate to perceived safer areas, resulting in demographic shifts and potential declines in property values. Some neighborhoods may see an outflow of residents, while others could experience an influx of people seeking refuge from violence. In addition, increased security measures may deter businesses and residents from certain locations, leading to long-term changes in population density and urban development patterns. Terrorism incidents can lead to significant changes in land use and development by shifting perceptions of safety. Following an attack, areas deemed high risk may see a decline in investment as businesses and residents seek safer locations. This could prompt urban planners to focus on enhancing security features in public and commercial spaces, potentially revising zoning regulations to create buffer zones around critical infrastructure. In addition, fear of future attacks may drive suburbanization, creating more security-conscious communities. Increased SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 46 Salt Lake City Additional Public Involvement Public involvement in Salt Lake City is fostered through various avenues that engage the community and enhance hazard awareness. Community newsletters provide essential information on safety protocols, updates on local events, and resources for residents. Hazard awareness campaigns regularly educate the public about risks and preparedness strategies. In addition, the city invites residents to participate in public meetings and events, ensuring that diverse perspectives are heard and incorporated into planning efforts. Organizations representing underserved and vulnerable populations play a crucial role in advocating for equitable access to resources and information. Furthermore, social media platforms serve as a dynamic tool for circulating notifications and fostering dialogue, allowing residents to stay informed and connected with critical community safety initiatives. The city provided several opportunities for public participation. Figure 1 and Figure 2 display examples of public outreach. Figure 1: Salt Lake City/BeReadySLC Social Media Post for the Hazard Mitigation Survey (left) and Second Post for the Hazard Mitigation Survey (right) SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 47 Figure 2: Salt Lake City Newsletter Announcement of the Public Survey Plan Integration Incorporating the underlying principles of the Hazard Mitigation Plan and its recommendations into other plans is a highly effective and low-cost way to expand their influence. All plan participants will use existing methods and programs to implement hazard mitigation actions where possible. As previously stated, mitigation is most successful when it is incorporated into the day-to-day functions and priorities of government and public service. This plan builds on the momentum developed through previous and related planning efforts and mitigation programs, and it recommends implementing actions where possible through these other program mechanisms. These existing mechanisms include the following: • Regularity Capabilities • Administrative Capabilities • Fiscal Capabilities Respective planning stakeholders will conduct implementation and incorporation into existing planning mechanisms and will be done through the routine actions of: • Monitoring other planning/program agendas • Attending other planning/program meetings • Participating in other planning processes; and • Monitoring community budget meetings for other community program opportunities. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 48 Salt Lake City The successful implementation of this plan will require constant and vigilant review of existing plans and programs for coordination and multi-objective opportunities that promote a safe, sustainable community. Regular efforts should be made to monitor the progress of mitigation actions implemented through other planning mechanisms. Where appropriate, priority actions should be incorporated into planning updates. Table 14 lists existing planning mechanisms in which the Hazard Mitigation Plan has been integrated. Table 15 lists the opportunities for integrating elements of this plan into other plans. Some areas of the city have neighborhood-specific plans, including Sugarhouse, City Creek, and Capitol Hill, and they might benefit from including mitigation information from this plan. Table 14: Integration of Previous Plans by Salt Lake City Plan Description Comprehensive Emergency Framework for the city’s disaster response 2025–2029 Consolidated Plan Roadmap for how the city will allocate fundings for grant programs Table 15: Opportunities for Integration with Future Plans of Salt Lake City Plan Description Overview of the city’s long-term goals and initiatives Open Space Plan Goals and initiatives to protect public green spaces Community Preservation Plan Overview of citywide community preservation efforts Strategic Plan Guiding document for how leaders envision the city over the next few years Urban Forest Action Plan Strategies related to forest and open space preservation/management Major Streets Plan Projects and other infrastructure improvements Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Addressing transportation initiatives Transit Plan Transit-oriented goals Transportation Plan Planned improvement projects and overall transportation goals for the city Housing SLC: 2023–2027 Housing goals Community Wildfire Protection Describes vulnerabilities and potential actions to reduce wildfire Stormwater Management Plan Overview of stormwater management practices Water Shortage Contingency Framework for responding to reduced water Water Conservation Plan Provides information on the current and future water supply along with water conservation goals Street Lightning Master Plan Review of lightning concerns and priorities Thriving in Place Plan Addresses the causes, extent, and impacts of displacement in the city SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 49 Plan Description Salt Lake City Fire Strategic Strategies and goals that guide the fire department over time Public Safety Plan Public Lands Master Plan Overview of public land initiatives and goals Cemetery Master Plan Guides preservation, access, and financial goals Parks and Recreation Master Plan Includes information about the park system and needs Foothills System Master Plan Provides information on environmental regulation and overall trail system goals Integrated Pest Management Management of invasive species and other noxious weeds in the Climate and Air Quality Plan Impact Fee Facilities Plan Capability Assessment Local mitigation capabilities are existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources that reduce hazard impacts or could help carry out hazard mitigation activities. Planning and Regulatory Capabilities Local mitigation capabilities are existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources that reduce hazard impacts or could help carry out hazard mitigation activities. Table 16: Assessment of the Planning Capabilities of Salt Lake City Plan Does it address hazards? (Y/N) How can it be used to implement mitigation actions? When was the last update? When is the next update? Y Can guide mitigation actions and identify responsible departments or agencies Yearly Capital Improvement Plan Y Can provide information on funding sources Multi-year Climate Change Adaptation Plan Y Can guide mitigation actions to be sustainable and actionable over time Ongoing Community Wildfire Protection Plan Y Community education and outreach, collaboration with local partners (Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management), and direct action through fuel reduction projects and evacuation route signage Ongoing SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 50 Salt Lake City Plan Does it address hazards? (Y/N) How can it be used to implement mitigation actions? When was the last update? When is the next update? Economic Y Can provide information on funding sources Yearly Land Use Plan Y Can guide mitigation actions related to open space and development Yearly Local Emergency Operations Plan Y response and recovery, which could inform mitigation actions Stormwater Management Plan Transportation Plan Y Identifies transit problems and areas of concern to guide Yearly Substantial Damage Plan Y Can provide information on responsible departments or agencies Yearly Other? (Describe) Table 17: Assessment of the Regulations and Ordinances of Salt Lake City Regulation/ Ordinance Does it effectively reduce hazard impacts? Is it adequately administered and enforced? When was the last update? When is the next update? Building Code Y; Salt Lake City has codes adopted by the state with amendments including the following: • The International Building Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code (currently IBC 2021) • The International Residential Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code • The International Fire Code • International Existing Building Code • International Energy Conservation Code • International Fuel Gas Code • National Electrical Code Y 8/22, Updated Yearly SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 51 Regulation/ Ordinance Does it effectively reduce hazard impacts? Is it adequately administered and enforced? When was the last update? When is the next update? • The International Mechanical Code • The International Plumbing Code • The International Swimming Pool and Spa Code • Rule R156-56 of the Utah Administrative Code • ICC/MBI 1205-2021 Standard for Off-Site Construction: Inspection and Regulatory Compliance, or its successor • 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. (Ord. 91-24, 2024: Prior Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) Y Y Last Updated: FIRMs are provided by FEMA. The most recent updates were released in 2016. Next Update: FEMA periodically reviews and updates FIRMs. FEMA determines the schedule for the next update, and it has not been specified. Floodplain Ordinance Y Y Last Updated: Chapter 18.68 of the Salt Lake City Code, which outlines regulations for floodplain hazard protection, was last amended in 2016. Next Update: There are no publicly announced plans for immediate updates. However, the city periodically reviews ordinances to ensure compliance with federal and Subdivision Ordinance Y Y Last Updated: Title 20 of the Salt Lake City Code encompasses the city’s subdivision regulations. The most recent amendments were made in 2018. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 52 Salt Lake City Regulation/ Ordinance Does it effectively reduce hazard impacts? Is it adequately administered and enforced? When was the last update? When is the next update? Next Update: Updates are conducted as needed to address emerging development trends and legal requirements. No specific timeline for the next revision has been announced. Zoning Ordinance Y Y Last Updated: Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code contains the zoning ordinances. The city is currently proposing to update its zoning ordinance and zoning map by consolidating up to 27 existing commercial, form-based, and mixed-use zoning districts into six new mixed-use districts. This effort seeks to streamline zoning regulations, clarify language, and integrate missing design standards. Next Update: The proposed zoning consolidation is under review, and public engagement opportunities are available. The timeline for adoption will depend on the review process and public feedback. Natural Hazard- Specific Ordinance (Stormwater, Steep Slope, Wildfire) Y Y Stormwater management: The Stormwater Control Ordinance, detailed in Division III, Chapter 17.75 of the city code, addresses stormwater discharge and design requirements. Municode Library Steep slopes: Regulations concerning development on steep slopes are included in the Foothills and Canyons Overlay Zone (FCOZ), Chapter 19.72 of the Salt Lake County Code. Municode Library Wildfire mitigation: The city has established a Citizen Wildfire Mitigation Permit Program, allowing residents to SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 53 Regulation/ Ordinance Does it effectively reduce hazard impacts? Is it adequately administered and enforced? When was the last update? When is the next update? reduction activities on adjacent public lands. Acquisition of Land for Open Space and Public Recreation Use Y actively acquires land for open space and recreational purposes, guided by the Open Space Lands Program. The purpose of the Open Space District is to preserve and enhance public and private open spaces, as stated in Section 21A.32.100 of the city code. CodeLibrary Next Update: The city continually assesses opportunities for land acquisition to expand open spaces and recreational areas. Related ordinances are updated as new projects and Prohibition of Building in At- Risk Areas Y Y Last Updated: The city enforces restrictions on development in areas prone to natural hazards, such as floodplains and steep slopes, through specific ordinances and overlay zones. For example, the FCOZ includes provisions to limit disturbance in sensitive areas. Municode Library Next Update: Revisions to these regulations are made to address evolving environmental conditions and incorporate best practices in Other? (Describe) Upsizing sewer lines, retrofit projects for unreinforced Administrative and Technical Capabilities Administrative and technical capabilities include staff and their skills. They also include tools that can help carry out mitigation actions. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 54 Salt Lake City Table 18: Assessment of the Administrative Capabilities of Salt Lake City Administrative Capability In Place? (Y/N) Is staffing adequate? Are staff trained on hazards and mitigation? Is coordination between agencies and staff effective? Chief Building Official Y Y Y Y Civil Engineer Y Y Y Y Community Planner Y Y Y Y Emergency Manager Y Y Y – Ongoing progress Y Floodplain Administrator Y Y Y Y Geographic Information System (GIS) Coordinator Y Y Y Y Planning Commission Y Y Y Y Fire Safe Council Y Y Y Y CERT (Community Emergency Response Team) Y N – working toward that goal Y – In a response component Y Active VOAD (Voluntary Agencies Active in Disasters) Y Y Y – Some groups are Y Other? (Please Table 19: Assessment of the Technical Capabilities of Salt Lake City Technical Capability In Place? (Y/N) Has it been used to assess/mitigate risk in the past? How can it be used to assess/mitigate risk in the future? Mitigation Grant Writing Y Housing stability resources for those experiencing homelessness or crisis Mitigation grant writing is a powerful tool for assessing and mitigating risks by securing funding for targeted projects that enhance community resilience. It facilitates comprehensive risk assessments, supports infrastructure hardening, funds natural hazard defenses, and enables investments in monitoring and early warning systems. Grants also promote public education, sustainable development, and policy improvements, fostering long-term resilience. By addressing emerging challenges like climate adaptation and sustainable growth, communities can proactively reduce vulnerabilities and strengthen preparedness. In addition, the grant process encourages data SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 55 Technical Capability In Place? (Y/N) Has it been used to assess/mitigate risk in the past? How can it be used to assess/mitigate risk in the future? that continuous improvement and effective risk management for the future. Hazard Data and Information Y Used to identify areas of concern or priority areas for mitigation projects assessing and mitigating future risks by providing a foundation for informed decision- making. This capability enables communities to identify vulnerabilities, prioritize resources, and model potential hazard scenarios. It supports proactive measures like updating building codes, refining zoning regulations, and planning infrastructure improvements. Access to accurate, real-time data enhances early warning systems, emergency response, and public education efforts. By continuously collecting and analyzing hazard information, communities can adapt to evolving risks, improve resilience, and effectively reduce the GIS Y Map overlays with information from flood plains to individual URM units across the Map overlays with information from flood plains to individual Unreinforced Masonry (URM) units across the city. Mutual Aid Agreements Y Agreements in place when an incident occurs, like the Sandhurst Fire Y Other? (Please Financial Capabilities Financial capabilities are the resources to fund mitigation actions. Talking about funding and financial capabilities is important to determine what kinds of projects are feasible, given their cost. Mitigation actions like outreach programs are lower cost and often use staff time and existing budgets. Other actions, such as earthquake retrofits, could require substantial funding from local, state, and federal partners. Partnerships, including those willing to donate land, supplies, in-kind matches, and cash, can be included. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 56 Salt Lake City Table 20: Assessment of the Financial Capabilities of Salt Lake City Funding Resource In Place? (Y/N) Has it been used in the past and for what types of activities? Could it be used to fund future mitigation actions? Can it be used as the local cost match for a federal grant? Project Funding Y Infrastructure improvements Y Y General Funds Y Operational costs, infrastructure improvements, pay increases for public safety professionals Y Y Hazard Mitigation Grant Y Has not been used yet Y N Building Resilient Infrastructure & Y Retrofit the water treatment plant Y N Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Y Has not been used yet Y N Public Assistance Mitigation (PA Mitigation/406) Y Has not been used yet Y N Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Y Local business improvements Y Y Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Programs Y Has not been used yet Y N U.S. Army Corps Y Has not been used yet Y N Property, Sales, Income, or Special Purpose Y Infrastructure improvements Y Y Stormwater Utility Fee Y Infrastructure management Y Y Fees for Water, Sewer, Y Infrastructure management Y Y Impact Fees from New Development and Redevelopment Y Transportation projects, infrastructure improvements Y Y General Obligation or Y Parks and land management Y Y Federal-funded Programs (Please describe) Y Affordable housing resources, infrastructure improvements, Y N SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 57 Funding Resource In Place? (Y/N) Has it been used in the past and for what types of activities? Could it be used to fund future mitigation actions? Can it be used as the local cost match for a federal grant? staffing, family support services, Private Sector or Y Shelter operations, trails maintenance Y N Other? Education and Outreach Capabilities Education and outreach capabilities are programs and methods that could communicate about and encourage risk reduction. A participant or a community-based partner may run these programs. Partners, especially those who work with underserved communities, can help identify additional education and outreach capabilities. Table 21: Assessment of the Education and Outreach Capabilities of Salt Lake City Education and Outreach Capability In Place? (Y/N) Does it currently incorporate hazard mitigation? Could it be used to support mitigation in the future? Y Y Y Hazard Awareness Campaigns (such as Firewise, Storm Ready, Severe Weather Awareness Y Y Y Public Meetings/Events (Please describe.) Y – Public education outreach campaigns are carried out at multiple large public gatherings yearly. Y Y Emergency Management Y Y Y Local News Distributing Hard Copies of Notices (e.g., public libraries, Y – Ready-Set-Go Y Y Insurance Disclosures/ Y Y Y Organizations that Represent, Advocate for, or Interact with Underserved and Vulnerable Y Y Y Social Media (Please describe.) Other? (Please describe.) SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 58 Salt Lake City Opportunities to Expand and/or Improve Capabilities Actions that can expand and improve existing authorities, plans, policies, and resources for mitigation include budgeting for mitigation actions, passing policies and procedures for mitigation actions, adopting and implementing stricter mitigation regulations, approving mitigation updates, and making additions to existing plans as new needs are recognized. Table 22 lists the opportunities for Salt Lake City. Table 22: Opportunities to Expand and/or Improve the Capabilities of Salt Lake City Capability Opportunity to Expand and/or Improve Planning and Regulation The community aims to develop a new Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) to replace the outdated version. In addition, it seeks to reassess the zoning and planned uses for River Street due to its history of repeated flooding and associated Administrative and Technical Current Capacity: • The Building Official is overwhelmed and lacks adequate support staff. • The Floodplain Manager would benefit from additional training in floodplain management, including determinations of substantial damage. • The community’s GIS system relies on outdated data, limiting its utility in planning and hazard analysis. Opportunities for Improvement: • Staffing Needs: Hire additional staff to support the Building Official, with cross- training in floodplain management to increase capacity. • Training: Implement specialized training programs for best practices in floodplain management, hazard mitigation, and zoning. • GIS Modernization: Update GIS data to include recent floodplain maps, wildfire risk assessments, and infrastructure inventories to inform decision-making. • Zoning Review: Partner with planning experts to revise zoning regulations for River Street and similar areas prone to flooding. Financial Current Capacity: • Local nonprofits have expressed interest in collaborating on mitigation initiatives and providing volunteer support. Opportunities for Improvement: • Grant Utilization: Hire grant-writing staff to help the Emergency Manager apply for BRIC and similar programs, leveraging federal funds for mitigation. • Nonprofit Partnerships: Engage local nonprofits to provide volunteer labor or in-kind contributions to meet local grant cost-match requirements. • Local Funding Mechanisms: Consider establishing special purpose taxes or stormwater utility fees to generate dedicated funding for hazard mitigation projects. • Private Sector Collaboration: Partner with local businesses to co-fund projects Education and Outreach Education and outreach to vulnerable populations can be expanded. We are working on translating our messages into languages common among our native SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 59 Mitigation Strategy Mitigation strategies provide proactive measures that are designed to minimize the impacts of hazards on Salt Lake City. Table 23 shows mitigation action alternatives, and Table 24 shows the status of previous mitigation activities. Table 25 is the 2025 mitigation action plan for Salt Lake City. Table 23: Mitigation Action Alternatives for Salt Lake City Action Type of Action Selected for inclusion in the plan? If not selected, why not? Review wildland evacuation zones and make changes if needed. Create additional zones within the city’s Yes Complete fuels mitigation in the Yes In reviewing the previous mitigation actions, SLC Public Lands reviewers indicated that fuel mitigation is an ongoing process in the wildland–urban interface (WUI) area. They have documented the actions that have been taken for these locations. However, they indicated that even if fuels have been mitigated in these areas once, that would not be enough to consider the project complete, so such mitigation should be included in the next plan cycle. Table 24: Status of Prior Mitigation Actions of Salt Lake City 5 Action Hazard(s) Agency Lead Support Agency(ies) Status Update Seismic retrofitting of URM buildings (public, residential, multi-family, and Earthquake SLC EM SLC Building Services, SLC FD, UDEM, SLCo EM Ongoing project. Conduct 1200 West sewer trunk rehabilitation. Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm, Severe Winter Weather SLCDPU SLC Engineering, water districts, SLCo Flood Control Completed. Conduct the 2300 E- Wilmington Ave– 5 FFSL = Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, NFPA = National Fire Protection Association, SCADA = Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, SLC = Salt Lake City, SLCDPU = Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, SLC EM = Salt Lake City Emergency Management, SLC FD = Salt Lake City Fire Department, SLCo = Salt Lake County, SLCo EM = Salt Lake County Emergency Management, SLC PD = Salt Lake City Police Department, UDEM = Utah Division of Emergency Management, UFA = Unified Fire Authority, URM = unreinforced masonry, USFS = United States Forest Service, WUI = Wildland-Urban Interface. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 60 Salt Lake City Action Hazard(s) Agency Lead Support Agency(ies) Status Update project. Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm Control 2026. Conduct 2100 South capacity upgrades. Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm SLCDPU SLC Engineering, water districts, SLCo Flood Control Completed. Conduct critical facility sewer rehab and reliability project. Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm, Severe Winter water districts, SLCo Flood Control Conduct South Temple capacity upgrades. Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm SLCDPU SLC Engineering, water districts, SLCo Flood Control Ongoing – Starting construction in January 2025. Upgrade the SLCDPU Admin & Operations Center. All hazards SLCDPU SLC Engineering, SLC Building, SLC EM, SLCo EM, SLC Public Services, SLC Ongoing – In planning phase but 10 years from start of construction. Conduct SCADA communications and security All hazards SLCDPU SLC Engineering, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLC EM Incomplete Procure and stage items needed for the back-up emergency response equipment staging. All hazards SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, SLCo Public Works, SLCo Flood Control, water districts Ongoing – Secured and filled sandbags during 2023 spring runoff. Ongoing as more equipment is expected to be needed. Mitigate fuels along the east side of East Capitol Blvd to create defensible space. Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC Parks, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC EM Ongoing – Area between Ottinger Hall and Memorial House cleared out in 2022 and trimmed up by Parks Department and volunteers late 2023. Mitigate fuels along the north side of Northmont Way to create defensible Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC Urban Forestry, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC EM Complete – Mitigated 06/10/2024. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 61 Action Hazard(s) Agency Lead Support Agency(ies) Status Update home ignition zones on East Tomahawk Dr., Chandler Dr, and Wildland Fire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM residence. Mow annual rye 25 ft. on either side of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail east of the Wildland Fire SLC FD UFA, University of Utah, FFSL, SLCo EM, SLC EM Ongoing – University of Utah property. Mow annual rye and mitigate around the shed north of Rotary Glen on This is the Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Ongoing with Utah State Parks. Mitigate fuels for ingress/egress along Red Butte Canyon Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLCDPU SLCDPU. Mitigate fuels at the mouth of Emigration Canyon under the Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Incomplete. Mitigate fuels along the east side of Devonshire Road. Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC Urban Forestry, SLC EM, SLCo EM, Complete: Mitigated 06/10/2024. Mitigate fuels for defensible space around the City Creek water treatment plant. Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLCDPU Ongoing with SLCDPU. Area currently under construction for Mitigate fuels for ingress/egress along City Creek Canyon access road up to the Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Not completed. Mitigate fuels and develop maintenance plan for FS lands in Red Butte Canyon Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Ongoing with USFS. Conduct Firewise native seeding for the following open space properties: Popperton, Chandler, Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Not completed. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 62 Salt Lake City Action Hazard(s) Agency Lead Support Agency(ies) Status Update local ordinance to allow homeowners to obtain a permit to conduct mitigation efforts on City property abutting their residential Wildland Fire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC Planning, SLC Urban Forestry Work with the State Department of Natural Resources to establish NFPA Firewise communities in WUI areas (which carry independent mitigation Wildland Fire SLC FD and FFSL EM, UFA Avenues Community Council is a Firewise community. Work with homeowners to help them identify risks, such as deteriorating power poles and work with them in finding solutions. Wildland Fire SLC EM SLC FD, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Ongoing – defensible space assessment portal is active and SLC FD is assisting residents with assessments. Multiple completed. Acquire commercial grade chipper and dump trailer. All hazards SLC EM and SLC FD FFSL Urban Forestry conducts chipper days with the community. UFA completes mitigation projects in Emigration Canyon. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 63 Table 25: 2025 Mitigation Action Plan for Salt Lake City 6 # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings (public, residential, multi-family, and business). Earthquake SLC EM SLC Building, SLC Planning, SLC FD, SLCo EM Reduction in the number of injuries and deaths after an earthquake High BRIC grant, HMGP grant, SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, Fix the Bricks grant Long-term High The scope includes promoting, enticing, or facilitating the retrofit or rehabilitation of URM buildings that are highly susceptible to severe damage or collapse and/or otherwise threaten the public during ground shake and extreme forces. 2 Conduct the 2300 E- Wilmington Ave.–Yuma St. upsizing project. Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm SLCDPU SLCo Flood Control, SLCo Public Works, SLC Engineering, SLCo EM High (public health, loss avoidance, flooding protection) High SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, BRIC grant, HGMP grant, CDBG grant Long-term High Scope includes the upsizing of the 2300 E-Wilmington Ave-Yuma St. sewer mains for capacity. 3 Upgrade the capacity of 2100 South sewer main. Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm SLCDPU SLCo Flood Control, SLCo Public Works, SLC Engineering, SLCo EM High (public health, loss avoidance, flooding protection) High SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, BRIC grant, HGMP grant, CDBG grant Long-term High Scope includes the upsizing of the 2100 S sewer main for capacity. 4 Conduct South Temple sewer main capacity upgrades. Flooding (Urban/Flash Flooding), Severe Thunderstorm SLCDPU SLCo Flood Control, SLCo Public Works, SLC Engineering, SLCo EM High (public health, loss avoidance, flooding protection High HMGP grant, BRIC grant, capital improvement funds, SLC general funds Long-term High Scope includes the upsizing of the south temple sewer main for capacity. 5 Upgrade the SLCDPU Administrations & Operations Center. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire SLC EM SLC Engineering, SLC Building, SLCo EM, SLC Public Services, SLC PD High (ensure functionality of emergency response and support) High SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, SHSP grant Long-term High Scope includes replacing the SLCDPU Administration and Operations Facility and constructing an integrated Dispatch/SCADA/Emergency Response Center. 6 Improve Supervisory Control Data Acquisition (SCADA) communications and security. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, SLCDPU SLC Engineering, SLC Building, SLC EM, SLCo EM, SLC Public Services, SLC PD, SIAC High (operational emergency response and response prioritization.) Medium SHSP grant, capital improvement funds, SLC general funds Short-term High The scope includes planning and building SCADA infrastructure to promote web-based alarms, monitoring capabilities, and communications. Work to include SCADA communications planning, cybersecurity assessment, and security recommendations. Planning 6 BRIC = Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, CDBG = Community Development Block Grant, CWDG = Community Wildfire Defense Grant, CWPP = Community Wildfire Protection Plan, FFSL = Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, FMA = Flood Mitigation Assistance, HDPE = High-density polyethylene, HHPD = High Hazard Potential Dam, HMGP = Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, IT = Information Technology, MSD = Municipal Services District, NWS = National Weather Service, SCADA = Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, SHSP = State Homeland Security Program, SIAC = Statewide Information and Analysis Center, SLC = Salt Lake City, SLCDPU = Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities, SLC EM = Salt Lake City Emergency Management, SLC FD = Salt Lake City Fire Department, SLCo = Salt Lake County, SLCo EM = Salt Lake County Emergency Management, SLC PD = Salt Lake City Police Department, UDEM = Utah Division of Emergency Management, UDNR = Utah Department of Natural Resources, UFA = Unified Fire Authority, UGRC = Utah Geospatial Resource Center, UGS = Utah Geological Survey, URM = unreinforced masonry, USFS = United States Forest Service, WUI = Wildland-Urban Interface, WUIPPM = Wildland Urban Interface Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 64 Salt Lake City # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire response plan with recommendations for equipment staging locations, facilities, 7 Procure and stage items needed for back-up emergency response. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, SLCo Public Works, SLCo Flood Control, water districts Medium (emergency response time, reduction of infrastructure downtime) Medium Capital improvement funds, SLC general funds, SHSP grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Medium term Low The scope includes the purchase and staging of portable generators, portable pumps, bypass piping, and HDPE fusing equipment to support collections, distributions, and emergency response in the treatment facility. Work would include the construction of planned staging and operations support facilities 8 Mitigate fuels along the east side of East Capitol Blvd to create defensible space. Wildfire SLC FD SLC Parks, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low CWDG grant, WUIPPM fund, BRIC grant, HMGP grant, SLC general funds Short-term Low 9 north side of Northmont Way to create defensible injury, and death from wildland fire WUIPPM fund, BRIC grant, HMGP grant, 10 Mitigate fuels in home ignition zones on East Tomahawk Dr., Chandler Dr, and Kristianna Circle. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 11 Mow annual rye 25 ft. on either side of the Bonneville Shoreline Trail east of the University of Utah. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP Short-term Low 12 Mow annual rye and mitigate around the shed north of Rotary Glen. This is a state park. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 13 Mitigate fuels for ingress/egress along the Red Butte Canyon access road. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP Short-term Low SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 65 # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Mitigate fuels at the mouth of Emigration Canyon under the high-rise buildings. FFSL, SLC EM injury, and death from wildland fire capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant 15 Mitigate fuels for defensible space around the City Creek water treatment plant. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 16 Mitigate fuels for ingress/egress along the City Creek Canyon access road up to the water treatment plant. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP Short-term Low 17 Mitigate fuels and develop a maintenance plan for USFS lands in Red Butte Canyon. Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 18 seeding for the following open space properties: Popperton, Chandler, and Morris Meadows. FFSL, SLC EM injury, and death from wildland fire capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP 19 Work on passing a local ordinance to allow homeowners to obtain a permit to conduct mitigation efforts on city property abutting their Wildfire SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC Planning, SLC Urban Forestry Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 20 Work with UDNR to establish NFPA Firewise communities in WUI areas (which carry independent mitigation requirements). Wildfire SLC FD UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC EM Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, WUIPPM funds, CWDG grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term Low 21 Work with homeowners to identify risks, such as deteriorating power poles, Wildfire, High Winds SLC FD SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL Reduction in damage, injury, and death from wildland fire Medium SLC general funds, capital improvement funds Short-term Medium 22 Acquire commercial-grade chipper and dump trailer. Wildfire, High Wind, Heavy Rain, Severe Winter Weather SLC EM SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, SLC FD Additional equipment will aid in achieving Low WUIPPM fund, CWDG grant, BRIC Short-term Low SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 66 Salt Lake City # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments multiple mitigation efforts throughout the county and aid in meeting CWPP obligations. SLC general funds 23 awareness activities on communications equipment, tools, and systems. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire Communications, SLCo EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLC Parks, SLCDPU, FFLS, local jurisdictions, UDEM, SIAC support collaboration and understanding of hazards impacting SLC. purposes. 24 availability and sharing capabilities, evaluate needs, and identify shortcomings. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, SIAC, UGRC, UDEM, local jurisdictions, water districts, SLCDPU, SLC IT better relationships between departments, increased understanding of needs UDEM, SLCo EM address these issues by forming a Common Operating Picture (COP). 25 on hazards, critical facilities, and critical infrastructure according to assessed needs. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, SIAC, UGRC, UDEM, local jurisdictions, water districts, SLCDPU understanding of at- risk areas, better knowledge of critical facility risk conjunction with our other projects. 26 Use GIS to identify facilities and infrastructure at risk. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire SLC GIS SLC EM, SLC Planning, SLC PD, SLCDPU, SLCo EM, UDEM Increased investment in GIS to identify risk and hazards, increased coordination across departments Low SLC general funds Short-term High GIS data estimates which buildings will fail and how much debris they will create. Data on URMs was used to create maps, planning tools, and educational material. 27 Assess critical facilities for hazard exposure, structural weaknesses regarding power, communications, equipment resource redundancy, and adequate emergency procedures. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC Communications, SLC FD, SLC Planning, SLCo EM, UDEM Better understanding of local hazards and identified deficiencies Low SLC general funds, SHSP grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term High Gathered data while participating in various programs, such as the (LEAP) and the Regional Resiliency Assessment Program (RRAP), to use in planning/ response. Plan to implement the use of an internet Protocol (IP) gateway. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 67 # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Implement improvements to address hazards. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire FD, SLC PD, SLC Communications, SLCo EM, UDEM capabilities to handle different incidents, increased understanding of resources across departments (project dependent) SHSP grant, BRIC grant, HMGP grant capabilities. Keep 96-hour supplies and equipment in various key locations for rapid access after an event. 29 mutual aid agreements and MOUs and identify deficiencies. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire PD, SLCo EM, SLCDPU, SLC Planning agreements in place in the event of a natural disaster or other large incident that overwhelms local resources SLCo EM, UDEM readily accessed, like the Web-based Emergency Operations Center (WebEOC) library. 30 education regarding all natural hazards through live training and web- based, print, and broadcast media. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire FD, NWS, UFA, SLCo EM, FFSL, SLC Communications, SLCDPU understanding of hazards, improved relationship with residents BRIC grant, NWS, HMGP grant coordinator to staff, and we use several forms of outreach (fairs, workshops, web pages, social media, etc.) 31 about the cascading effects of hazards in education programs. Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire PD, UFA, SLCo EM, NWS, FFSL, UDEM, water districts, school districts, NGO partners, SLC Communications, SLCDPU understanding of local hazards and how they will be mitigated or addressed in operations our Fix the Bricks program and URM maps. Promote community participation in programs like SAFE Neighborhoods. 32 Develop education programs to target specific groups, including homeowners, developers, schools, and people with special needs. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials Incident, Heavy Rain, High Wind, Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Terrorism, Tornado, Wildfire SLC EM SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, UDEM, FFSL, UFA, water districts, school districts, NGO partners, SIAC, SLC Communications, Improved understanding of those with access and functional needs, identified capabilities outlined Low SLC general funds, SLCo EM, UDEM Short-term Medium Via Fix the Bricks and other community programs. 33 Continue to establish and enforce appropriate planning, zoning, and building code ordinances. Avalanche, Civil Disturbance, Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme Cold, Extreme Heat, Flooding, Hazardous Materials SLC Planning and Zoning SLC PD, SLC FD, SLC Parks, SLCo Parks and Recreation, Improved public safety, improved coordination between departments Low SLC general funds Short-term High Adopted current international building code. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 68 Salt Lake City # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Landslide/Slope Failure, Lightning, Public Health Epidemic/Pandemic, Radon, Severe Winter Weather, Control, MSD, SLCo Public 34 Complete seismic rehabilitation/retrofitting projects of public buildings at risk. Earthquake SLCDPU SLC Building, SLC Planning and Zoning, SLCDPU, SLC PD, SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC Communications, SLCo EM, UFA, Improved public safety High SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, HMGP grant, BRIC grant Medium-term High 35 Maintain the Hazardous Weather Operations Plan according to StormReady requirements. Severe Weather, Heavy Rain/Flash Flooding, Wildfire, High Winds SLC EM SLCo Public Works, SLCo EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCDPU, SLC Communications Improved coordination between departments and agencies, increased understanding of local hazards Low SLC general funds Short-term Medium 36 Assess existing water flow capabilities, both public and private, and address deficiencies. Wildfire SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC PD, SLC FD, SLC Communications, SLC Parks, SLC Urban Forestry, SLC Planning Improved infrastructure, reduced maintenance costs Low SLC general funds Short-term Medium 37 CWPP and make updates as needed. EM, UFA, FFSL, UDEM, SLCDPU document for wildfire management and mitigation, improved coordination between local, state, and federal agencies CWDG grant, WUIPPM fund 38 Identify structures at risk of earthquake damage through Hazus data and building inspections. Earthquake SLCDPU SLC EM, SLCo EM, UFA, MSD, SLCo Public Works, SLC Communications, Increased understanding of local risks and areas of concern for prioritization Low SLC general funds, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term High 39 Provide educational materials to URM home and business owners, mainly marketing Fix the Bricks Program to educate home and business owners about masonry reinforcement. Earthquake SLC EM SLC FD, SLC PD, SLC Parks, SLCo EM, UFA, UDEM, SLCDPU Improved communication between public and private stakeholders Low SLC general funds, Fix the Bricks grant Short-term Medium Fix the Bricks was added to our community outreach materials and publications. 40 Encourage active participation in the NFIP. Flooding SLC EM SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCDPU, SLC Parks, SLC Improved coordination between departments Low SLC general funds Short-term Medium SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 69 # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments Urban Forestry, SLC Communications, 41 Determine potential flood impacts and identify areas in need of additional flood control structures. Flooding, Dam Failure SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLC Parks, SLC Urban Forestry, UDEM, SLCo Flood Control, water districts Updated maps and information for personnel to reference in emergency plans. Additional mitigation projects and data needed for grant Low SLC general funds, BRIC grant, HMGP grant, capital improvement funds Short-term Medium 42 Address identified problems through construction of debris basins, flood retention ponds, energy dissipaters, and other flood control Flooding, Dam Failure SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCo Flood Control, SLCo EM, UDEM, water districts Updated infrastructure, reduced repair costs and impacts from hazard events Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Medium-term Medium 43 Provide maintenance, repairs, and improvements to drainage structures, stormwater systems, and flood-control structures. Flooding SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC PD, SLCo EM, SLCo Flood Control, water districts, UDEM Updated infrastructure, regular maintenance schedule Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, BRIC grant, HMGP grant Short-term High Unknown 44 communities to develop or update evacuation plans. FFSL, SLCDPU, SLC Communications, SLCo Public Works, SLC FD for public safety personnel to reference; real-time information for residents with evacuation zones SLCo EM evacuation zones and a formal plan. 45 Develop a protocol for working with state and federal agencies in reducing the impact of post-fire debris flow hazard. Wildfire SLC FD SLC PD, SLCo EM, UFA, FFSL, UDEM, water districts, SLCDPU, SLC Communications, SLC EM Improved coordination between different agencies, increased understanding of risks Low SLC general funds, UDEM, FFSL, UFA, SLCo EM Short-term Medium 46 Coordinate with the Utah Geological Survey and other agencies to understand current slope failure threats/potential. Wildfire, Landslide/Slope Failure, Flooding SLC EM SLCDPU, SLC GIS, SLC Communications, SLCo EM, UDEM, FFSL, Improved coordination between different agencies Low SLC general funds Short-term Medium 47 Continue to implement water-saving devices and practices in public facilities. Drought, Wildfire, Extreme Heat SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLC Communications, SLC Planning, Extends the use of the SLC’s water resources Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, CDBG grant Short-term High SLC policy that public facilities meet Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED) silver standards at a minimum. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 70 Salt Lake City # Action Hazard(s) Lead Agency Potential Partners Benefits (Losses Avoided) Cost Estimate Funding Source(s) Time-frame Priority Comments SLC Parks, SLC Urban Forestry, SLCo Parks and 48 Repair, maintain, and improve water distribution infrastructure to prevent loss from leakage, breaks, Drought, Heavy Rain/Flooding, Earthquake, Extreme Heat, Extreme Cold SLCDPU SLC EM, SLC FD, SLCo Public Works, SLCo EM Gives SLC better control over their stormwater system, improving functioning Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds Short-term High 49 Coordinate public safety water use, such as hydrant testing. Drought, Extreme Heat, Wildfire, Extreme Cold SLC FD SLC EM Infrastructure improvements, regular checks to ensure resources are Low SLC general funds, capital improvement funds, impact fees Short-term High 50 Provide information on landscaping alternatives for persons subject to green area requirements. Drought, Heavy Rain/Flooding, Extreme Heat Salt Lake City Emergency Management Unknown Improved coordination between different departments and agencies Low SLC general funds, CDBG grant Short-term High 51 Work with county and state agencies to conduct risk studies or engineering assessments to identify the needs for improving dam safety condition rating. Dam Failure SLCo EM Dam Owners, Salt Lake County Public Works Flood Control Engineering, Utah Division of Water Rights Dam Safety Section, Salt Lake City Public Utilities, Local Reduce potential losses from failure of HHPDs. Medium Salt Lake County General Fund, HHPD Grant, HMGP Grant Medium Medium HHPDs with potential impacts on Salt Lake City and a safety condition rating of fair: SLCO Chandler Drive #13, SLCO Shriners #12, SLCO Federal Heights #1a, and SLCO Rotary Glen Park. HHPDs with potential impacts on SLC and a safety condition rating of poor: Mountain Dell. 52 Partner with county and state agencies, as well as neighboring jurisdictions, to rehabilitate or complete other safety projects for high hazard dams based on dam safety reports or risk studies. Dam Failure SLCo EM Dam Owners, Salt Lake County Public Works Flood Control Engineering, Utah Division of Water Rights Dam Safety Section, Salt Lake City Public Utilities, Local Governments Reduce potential losses from failure of HHPDs. High Salt Lake County General Fund, HHPD Grant, HMGP Grant Long term High See above SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Salt Lake City 71 Mitigation Success Story Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) is rehabilitating the Emigration Creek stormwater culvert beneath 1700 South. The culvert and stormwater infrastructure had fallen into disrepair, and a 2023 flooding event exacerbated poor conditions and expedited the project timeline. Unnecessary erosion was occurring along the banks of Emigration Creek and could lead to stormwater contamination. The project goals included the following: • Slip-lining the existing 60” diameter culvert with a durable-material pipe to extend longevity • Extending the existing culvert approximately 50 feet downstream and realigning it with the centerline of Emigration Creek to better direct flows away from embankments • Adding an outlet erosion control structure to dissipate creek flow energy and mitigate the risk of further embankment erosion • Revegetating and grading existing embankment landscaping • Using trenchless technology to rehabilitate the existing pipe to minimize the impact on the natural environment Construction began in October 2024 and was scheduled for completion in the spring of 2025. SALT LAKE COUNTY MULTI -JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 72 Salt Lake City THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN K This page has intentionally been left blank RESOLUTION NO. _____ OF 2025 Adopting the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan. WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS, the City has participation in the creation of a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with the Disaster mitigation Act of 2000; and WHEREAS, the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard mitigation Plan identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in Salt Lake City from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and WHEREAS, adoption of this resolution by the City Council of Salt Lake City demonstrates the City’s commitment to hazard mitigation and to achieving the goals outlined in the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The City Council hereby adopts the 2025 Salt Lake County Hazard Mitigation Plan; and 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ________ day of ________, 2025. ___________________________________ Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: _________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to Mayor on ____________________________. Mayor’s Action: _________ Approved. ____________ Vetoed. ___________________________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM Office of the City Attorney Date: September 9, 2025 By: _______________________________ Jaysen Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Item F2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 www.slc.gov/council TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET SALT LAKE CITY Council TO:Salt Lake City Council FROM:Kate Werrett, Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE: RESOLUTION: Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement MOTION 1 – ADOPT RESOLUTION I move that the Council adopt a resolution to approve the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt the resolution approving the resolution to approve the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Community Reinvestment Agency Chair Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/29/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/30/2025 From: Department * Community Reinvestment Agency Employee Name: Stine, Robyn E-mail robyn.stine@slc.gov Community Reinvestment Agency Director Signature Mayor's Office Chief of Staff Signature Community Reinvestment Agency Director Signed Date 09/29/2025 Chief of Staff's Signed Date 09/29/2025 Subject: Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement Additional Staff Contact: Marcus Lee, marcus.lee@slc.govCara Lindsley, cara.lindsley@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Marcus Lee, marcus.lee@slc.govCara Lindsley, cara.lindsley@slc.gov Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Consider adopting a resolution approving the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency Background/Discussion This is the interlocal agreement to authorize the sharing of tax increment between the City and the CRA for the SL Central HTRZ. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCRDA.COM P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245 MAYOR RIN ENDENHALL Executive Director DANNY ALZ Director SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL TO: Salt Lake City Council Chris Wharton, Chair DATE: September 26, 2025 PREPARED BY: Marcus Lee, CRA Project Coordinator Cara Lindsley, CRA Deputy Director RE: Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement REQUESTED ACTION: Consider adopting a resolution approving the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency POLICY ITEM: Project Area Creation BUDGET IMPACTS: Future Salt Lake Central HTRZ Tax Increment Revenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On May 1, 2025, the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Committee (“HTRZ Committee”) conditionally approved the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency’s (“CRA’s”) and Salt Lake City’s (“City’s”) Salt Lake Central HTRZ Application (“HTRZ Plan”). The HTRZ Plan outlines the participating taxing entities, tax increment participation rates, the term of tax increment collection, and the planned utilization of tax increment funds in the project area. For the City and CRA to receive and use tax increment, Utah Code Section 63N-3-607 requires that the parties execute an interlocal agreement (“ILA”) with terms that 1) are consistent with the approval of the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Committee (“HTRZ Committee”); and 2) meet the requirements of Section 63N-3-603. The purpose of this memorandum is to: • Request the City Council (“Council”) to consider adopting a resolution authorizing the terms within the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement between the City and the CRA. ANALYSIS: Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zones (“HTRZs”) are intended to facilitate mixed-use, multi-family, and affordable housing developments within a certain radius of a public transit stop. HTRZs are also intended to increase the utilization of public transit options, promote and develop owner occupied housing, improve parking and transportation efficiencies, assist in overcoming development impediments and market conditions that limit construction opportunities, conserve water through efficient land use, improve air quality by reducing fuel consumption, and increase opportunities to education, employment, and childcare opportunities. The tax increment is intended to support the Rio Grande District and provide community benefits in the surrounding neighborhoods. Enhanced pedestrian and utility infrastructure, affordable housing, and efficient parking measures like structured parking are some of the anticipated public benefits that HTRZ funds will enable, maximizing development opportunities A summary of the HTRZ approved terms are described below: HTRZ Committee Approved Terms: Salt Lake Central HTRZ Base Years Phase 1: Phase 2: The year prior to commencing tax increment collection in Phase 2 Base Year Taxable Value Collection Period & Phasing beginning no later than December 31, 2026, and Phase 2 beginning no later than December 31, 2030 Participation Rate Contribution Cap Tax Increment Eligible Uses Affordable housing Enhanced residential costs Participating Taxing Entities Salt Lake City School District Salt Lake City Salt Lake City Library Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District Central Utah Water Conservancy District Other notable terms included by the HTRZ Committee within the project area approval include: • Affordable Housing Requirement: Of the residential development, up to 9% of the dwelling units much be affordable to households earning less than or equal to 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI), and at least 3% of the dwelling units must be affordable to households earning less than or equal to 60% of AMI. NEXT STEPS: The CRA anticipates triggering the collection of tax increment for Phase 1 of the HTRZ in 2026. Applicants seeking a tax increment reimbursement in the HTRZ must comply with the CRA’s adopted HTRZ tax increment reimbursement policy. PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION: • August 2024: Staff provided an update on the upcoming submittal of the Salt Lake Central HTRZ application. • December 2023: The CRA Board approved the HTRZ Tax Increment Reimbursement Policy. • November 2023: Staff provided an update on the Salt Lake Central HTRZ application and project area plan. • August 2022: Staff provided an overview of HTRZs and potential locations throughout the City. ATTACHMENTS: A. City Resolution authorizing the execution of the Salt Lake Central HTRZ Interlocal Agreement with the CRA for the Salt Lake Central HTRZ, with Salt Lake Central HTRZ Plan attached B. Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity Salt Lake Central HTRZ Approval Letter ATTACHMENT A: CITY RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CRA FOR THE SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO. ________ OF 2025 (Authorizing the execution of an interlocal agreement with the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency for the use of a portion of tax increment to support the implementation of the Salt Lake Central Housing Transit Reinvestment Zone) WHEREAS, on May 1, 2025, pursuant to Utah Code Section 63N-3-605, the Utah Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Committee approved the application of Salt Lake City Reinvestment Agency (“Agency”) and Salt Lake City (“City”) for Salt Lake Central Housing Transit Reinvestment Zone application (the “HTRZ Plan”). WHEREAS, under the HTRZ Plan, the Agency and City will receive tax increment from a variety of taxing entities to support transit-oriented development with a high density of affordable housing and mixed uses in the HTRZ Plan project area. WHEREAS, for the City and Agency to receive and use the tax increment generated in the HTRZ Plan area, Utah Code 63N-3-607 requires that the parties execute an interlocal agreement which sets forth the terms under which the City will convey the tax increment to the Agency to be used consistent with the purposes set forth in the HTRZ Plan, state law, and the HTRZ Committee Approval Letter. WHEREAS, the parties desire to execute the attached interlocal agreement in which the City consents to the Agency receiving the tax increment from the HTRZ Plan project area. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 1. It does hereby approve the execution and delivery of an interlocal cooperation agreement between the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency and Salt Lake City Corporation regarding the use of tax increment from the Salt Lake Central Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone. Such agreement shall be effective upon both the City and Agency approving the agreement. The interlocal agreement does not create an interlocal entity. 2. Erin Mendenhall, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah or her designee is hereby authorized to approve, execute, and deliver said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, in substantially the same form as now before the City Council and attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to such minor changes that do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder and as shall be approved by the Mayor, her execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of such approval. 3. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this day of , 2025. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Chris Wharton, Chairperson Attest: City Recorder Approved as to form: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office /s/ Sara Montoya Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney Date: September 29, 2025 EXHIBIT A [Attach Form Interlocal Agreement] 1 INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND THE SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Salt Lake Central Housing Transit Reinvestment Zone Tax Increment This interlocal cooperation agreement (Interlocal Agreement) is executed between the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (the “Agency”) and Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”). RECITALS A. On May 1, 2025, and pursuant to Utah Code Section 63N-3-605, the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Committee approved the Agency’s and City’s Salt Lake Central Housing Transit Reinvestment Zone Application (the HTRZ Plan), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A and includes a parcel list and a map of the Salt Lake Central Housing Transit Reinvestment Zone area (the Project Area). B. Under the HTRZ Plan, the Agency and City support transit-oriented development in the Project Area with a high density of affordable housing and mixed uses, which will be accessible for a range of income levels. C. By submitting the HTRZ Plan for review and approval by the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone Committee, the Agency and City determined that it is in their best interests to provide certain financial assistance using tax increment (as defined in Utah Code Section 63N-3- 602(33), hereinafter, Tax Increment) from participating taxing entities. The taxing entities that are participating include the City, Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City School District, Salt Lake City Library, Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District, Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District, and Central Utah Water Conservancy District (each a Taxing Entity, and collectively, Taxing Entities). D. On December 12, 2023, the Agency adopted a policy to guide the use and distribution of Tax Increment (HTRZ Policy). E. The Agency anticipates using Tax Increment created by development activities in the Project Area to assist in development as set forth in the HTRZ Plan and consistent with the HTRZ Policy and HTRZ Committee Approval Letter. F. For the City and Agency to receive and use the Tax Increment, Utah Code Section 63N- 3-607 requires that the parties execute this agreement to set forth the terms under which the City will convey the Tax Increment to the Agency consistent with the purposes set forth in the HTRZ Plan, state law, and HTRZ Committee Approval Letter. 2 AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. Tax Increment. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the HTRZ Plan. The City hereby agrees that the Agency shall receive a maximum capture of eighty percent (80%) of the Tax Increment from the Project Area for a term of twenty-eight (28) years to use consistent with the HTRZ Policy, HTRZ Plan, state law, and the HTRZ Committee Approval Letter. a. Timing. The collection period for Phase 1 shall begin no later than December 31, 2026, and be triggered when the CRA provides notice of the commencement of the collection of Tax Increment to the Taxing Entities and various third-party entities as detailed in 63N-3-603. The collection period for Phase 2 shall begin no later than December 31, 2028, and be triggered when the CRA provides notice of the commencement of the collection of Tax Increment to various third-party entities as detailed in 63N-3-603 b. Calculation of Tax Increment. Pursuant to Utah Code Section 63N-3-602(33), the calculation of annual Tax Increment shall be the difference between (i) the amount of property tax revenue generated by a Taxing Entity from the Project Area using the current assessed value and each Taxing Entity’s certified tax rate, and (ii) the amount of property tax revenue generated from the Project Area using the base taxable value and each Taxing Entity’s then current certified tax rate. The Phase 1 base taxable value shall be calculated using 2025 as the base year, with the Phase 2 base taxable value being calculated as the year prior to tax increment collection commencement, for example, a 2027 base year value for a 2028 collection trigger. 2. Interlocal Cooperation Act. In satisfaction of the requirements of Utah Code Chapter 11-13 (the Interlocal Cooperation Act) in connection with this agreement, the parties agree as follows: a. This Interlocal Agreement shall be authorized and adopted by resolution of the legislative body of each party pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 11-13- 202.5 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. b. This Interlocal Agreement shall be reviewed as to proper form and compliance with applicable law by a duly authorized attorney on behalf of each party pursuant to and in accordance with Section 11-13-202.5(3) of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. c. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Interlocal Agreement, each party shall be responsible for its own costs for any action taken pursuant to this agreement, and for any financing of such costs. 3 d. A duly executed original counterpart of this Interlocal Agreement shall be filed immediately with the keeper of records of each party pursuant to Section 11-13-209 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. e. No separate legal entity is created by the terms of this Interlocal Agreement. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby designated the administrator for all purposes of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, pursuant to Section 11-13-207 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. f. Following the execution of this Interlocal Agreement by each of the parties, each party may cause a notice regarding this agreement to be published in accordance with Section 11- 13-219 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. g. No real or personal property shall be acquired jointly by the parties because of this agreement. To the extent a party acquires, holds, or disposes of any real or personal property for use in the joint or cooperative undertaking contemplated by this Interlocal Agreement, such party shall do so in the same manner that it deals with other property of such party. 3. Modification and Amendment. Any modification of or amendment to any provision of this Interlocal Agreement shall be effective only if the modification or amendment is in writing and signed by each of the parties. Any oral representation or modification concerning this Interlocal Agreement shall be of no force or effect. 4. Further Assurance. Each of the parties hereto agrees to cooperate in good faith with the other, to execute and deliver such further documents, to adopt any resolutions, to take any other official action, and to perform such other acts as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to consummate and carry into effect the transactions contemplated under this Interlocal Agreement. 4 Executed to be effective as of the date this agreement is filed with the Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office. SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director Approved as to proper form with applicable law: ___________________________________ Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney Attest: ___________________________________ Salt Lake City Recorder SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Approved as to proper form with applicable law: _____________________________ Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Mark Kittrell, City Attorney Attest: ___________________________________ Salt Lake City Recorder 5 EXHIBIT A HTRZ Plan PROPOSAL SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2024 Salt Lake Central Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone (HTRZ) 3 Executive Summary 15 Key Objectives 5 Proposed HTRZ Location 18 Property Tax Increment Budget 6 Project Highlights 20 Proposed Expenditures 10 Development Plan 23 Alternative Funding Sources 11 Housing Supply 24 Sales & Use Tax Increment 12 Affordable Housing Funding Priorities 13 Zoning Table of Contents Attachments A. List of Property Tax Increment Collection Parcels 26 D. Affordable Housing Gap Analysis E. Sales Tax Analysis B. Development Details + Absorption Schedule C. Property Tax Increment Budget + Base Year Values Delta Center Historic Rio Grande Depot Central Business District Salt Lake Central Station Figure 1. Context Map of HTRZ area and Downtown landmarks to the east 3 Executive Summary The proposed HTRZ includes 116.71 acres of developable land within a ½-mile radius of the Utah Transit Authority’s (“UTA”) Salt Lake Central Station, which is located just west of Salt Lake City’s Central Business District. The station is commonly referred to as the Intermodal Hub as it provides access to Frontrunner commuter rail, TRAX light rail, local bus, Amtrak, and Greyhound services. Additional connections of the proposed HTRZ to the University of Utah (“U of U”) and Granary District are being recommended by the recently concluded TechLink TRAX Study, which was funded by a federal Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant awarded to a partnership of UTA, Salt Lake City, and the U of U. The wealth of existing and future transit service complements parallel projects planned to occur within or adjacent to the HTRZ area, such as the redevelopment of approximately 16.07 acres owned by the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“RDA”) and 25.79 acres of UTA-owned property, a plethora of private housing development, as well as Salt Lake City’s investment in alternative transportation modes via initiatives like the 200 South Reconstruction project, 400 South bikeway, and Green Loop linear park and urban trail. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Provides an opportunity to implement the strategic planning work that has been done in this area, including recommendations of the Salt Lake Central Station Area Plan, Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan, and TechLink TRAX Study. Planned infrastructure investments include the construction of new mid-block streets, safe pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit facilities, the concentration of shared parking facilities, potential expansion of the TRAX network, and sustainable utility upgrades. HTRZ funds will support transformative mixed-use development with a high level of public benefit, with assistance provided to overcome natural and man-made development impediments and current market conditions. The model anticipates that 59.8% of the collection parcel acreage will contain residential uses for a total of 5,793 residential units averaging 83 units per acre. 174 units will be attainable for those earning up to 60% of Area Median Income (“AMI”) and 521 attainable for those earning up to 80% AMI. Existing RDA policies target the creation of owner-occupied housing and will be implemented within the HTRZ when possible. The proposed HTRZ is in an area with some of the highest development potential left in Salt Lake City. The development model anticipates the creation of 565,358 sf of commercial space, 59,000 sf of light industrial/maker space, 3,293,234 sf of office, and 325 hotel rooms. 4Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ The vision for the HTRZ – to encourage dense, mixed-use, walkable, sustainable development adjacent to the most transit-rich site in the State of Utah – fully embraces key legislative objectives: Figure 2. Transportation Context Map 5 Proposed HTRZ Location The proposed HTRZ includes 116.71 acres of developable land within a ½-mile radius of UTA’s Salt Lake Central Station, which is located just west of Salt Lake City’s Central Business District. The station is commonly referred to as the Intermodal Hub as it provides access to Frontrunner commuter rail, TRAX light rail, local bus, Amtrak, and Greyhound services. Additional connections of the proposed HTRZ to the U of U and Granary District are being recommended by the recently concluded TechLink TRAX Study, which was funded by a federal RAISE grant awarded to a partnership of UTA, Salt Lake City, and the U of U. The wealth of existing and future transit service complements parallel projects planned to occur within or adjacent to the HTRZ area, such as the redevelopment of approximately 16.07 acres of RDA-owned property and 25.79 acres of UTA-owned property, a plethora of private housing development, as well as Salt Lake City’s investment in alternative transportation modes via initiatives like the 200 South Reconstruction project, 400 South bikeway, and Green Loop linear park and urban trail. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Please refer to page 18 for a map of the proposed HTRZ boundary and property tax increment collection parcels, Attachment A for a complete list of collection parcel ID numbers, and page 24 for a map of the sales and use tax collection boundary. 6 Project Highlights The Rio Grande District is a dense, mixed-use, transit-oriented development located at the heart of the HTRZ with low-stress pedestrian and bicycle facilities that are seamlessly connected to Salt Lake Central Station. The Vision & Implementation Plan, which has been provided to the Committee, calls for a network of unique public spaces to support adjacent density, such as: the reconstruction of 300 South into a Festival Street that can be closed and activated by the community; an Arts Alley with art installations, cultural events, performances, and adjacent maker spaces for emerging artists; a section of the Green Loop, a 5.5-mile urban trail and linear park that will be a critical part of the neighborhood’s mobility network and provide much-needed open space and areas for recreation; and the addition of multiple mid-block streets to enhance connectivity and walkability. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Rio Grande District Anticipated land uses include a high-intensity employment hub along 600 West with incubator, lab, and office space to support the State of Utah’s growing innovation industries, a hotel, dedicated space for community-benefitting non- profits, and residential mixed-use throughout, including a 400-foot-tall residential tower. USA Climbing plans to build their permanent headquarters and national training facility on the southwest corner of 500 West and 300 South. The developmet concept prioritizes activated ground floors wherever possible, including a “Festival Retail Zone” along 300 South, a “Maker Space Zone” lining the Arts Alley, and “Transit Street Zone” on frontage near Salt Lake Central Station. A shared parking structure will concentrate parking at the perimeter of the District to reduce internal traffic, conflicts with pedestrians and bicyclists, and the amount of land devoted to parking at each individual development site. Figure 3. Diagram of Rio Grande District at full buildout 7 Project Highlights Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Redevelopment of Salt Lake Central Station Figure 4. Rendering of new UTA headquarters and transit amenities that are being contemplated at Salt Lake Central Station - photo courtesy of Utah Transit Authority UTA is exploring the feasibility of redeveloping its land holdings within the HTRZ, including the current Salt Lake Central Station site, which is a prominent entry point to Salt Lake City for transit users. Preliminary designs include a completely re-envisioned intermodal hub with two six-story structures that are connected with an enclosed transit hall. Mass timber may be used due to its lighter weight, mitigating challenging soil conditions caused by the area’s high groundwater table. Anticipated land uses include retail and amenities for transit patrons on the ground floor and office uses on upper levels, to include space for a new UTA headquarters. This is a significant opportunity to improve the customer experience and accommodate smoother connections between various transportation modalities. 8 Project Highlights Planned 5+ mile urban trail and linear park system that will encircle downtown Salt Lake City. Project’s objective is to improve the quality of life for people living, working, and traveling downtown by adapting ~60 acres of existing street space to include more trees, shade, and comfortable options for a variety of transportation choices. Added green spaces will provide critical ecosystem services and contribute to a more resilient city by managing stormwater, reducing the heat island effect, and improving air quality. Salt Lake City has developed a preliminary design concept for the eastern leg of the Green Loop to understand its impacts, constructability, and project costs. Western leg to follow. This is a significant public investment – preliminary construction cost estimate of ~$8-10 million per block. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Green Loop Figure 5. Green Loop concept as depicted in Salt Lake City’s The Downtown Plan (2016) 9Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Figure 7. Rendering of potential Green Loop on 500 West near Rio Grande District, looking north Figure 6. Historic and present images of 500 West near Rio Grande District, looking south Land Use Square Footage (sf) / Count (#) Residential Units 5,793 Commercial 565,358 Makers Space 59,000 Office 3,293,234 Hotel Rooms 325 10 Development Plan Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ The HTRZ proposal and development model includes parcels with specific development plans as well as underutilized parcels that are likely to develop over the HTRZ’s term. Where development-specific information is available, those details have been included. For parcels where development details are yet to be finalized, Salt Lake City zoning standards and industry-specific floor-to-area ratios were utilized to determine their highest and best uses. Table 1. Anticipated land uses, by quantity 11 Housing Supply Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Based on the development model, it is estimated that approximately 59.8% of the collection parcel acreage will incorporate residential uses for a total of 5,793 housing units averaging 83 units per acre. Please refer to page 12 – Affordable Housing Funding Priorities – for further details on RDA-imposed requirements for varied dwelling unit sizes and housing affordability that is maintained through deed restriction. Figure 8. Map of estimated housing density, by collection parcel 12 Affordable Housing Funding Priorities The RDA has multiple policies in place to ensure that requirements contained in Utah Code 63N-3-603(2) will be met or exceeded with administration of the HTRZ: HTRZ Tax Increment Reimbursement Policy - Establishes guidelines for the distribution of HTRZ tax increment to project developers or property owners via tax increment reimbursement agreements. Threshold Requirements of Projects that Incorporate Housing: Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Deeply Affordable Housing: Expand the availability of units for extremely low-income households, thereby providing housing options for individuals or families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness; Affordable Family Housing with Amenities for Children: Provide opportunities for families to enjoy the many benefits of urban living by encouraging the development of housing that is more conducive to larger household sizes that have at least three or more bedrooms and includes family-oriented amenities; Wealth Building Opportunity: Facilitate the ability for low-moderate income households to build wealth through different pathways such as homeownership, supplemental income opportunities, stipends for renters, cooperative housing, and other wealth building models; Neighborhood Commercial and Services: Promote an array of commercial spaces that support the neighborhoods, such as daycares, restaurants, and retail spaces; and Expand Opportunities: Provide affordable housing within areas that have access to resources that may improve a person’s chances of upward economic mobility as identified on RDA’s High Opportunity Area map. Housing Development Funding Strategy - Establishes housing priorities for the current fiscal year, to be implemented via the RDA’s various housing funding programs. Adopted funding priorities for FY25 are as follows: At least 10% of housing units within a project must be affordable to those earning 60% of the area median income (“AMI”) and below, or, 20% of units must be affordable to those earning 80% AMI and below. Income averaging of units within a single project may be utilized to achieve AMI thresholds. If the ground floor is not a private residence, projects must include ground floor space that is activated with commercial, office, or retail uses that are not exclusive to the tenants of the building. Deed Restriction – Prior to executing a participation agreement, a restriction shall be recorded against the property that requires continued use of the specified units as affordable housing for at least 30 years. Bedroom Count Mix – The affordable units shall be located on different floors of the building and spread among bedroom counts (1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, etc.) in the same proportion as the units available within the rest of the project. Affordable Housing Requirements: a. b. a. b. a. b. c. d. e. 13 Zoning Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ As can be seen in the map on the next page, the majority of the proposed HTRZ land area is currently zoned as either Gateway-Mixed Use (G-MU) or General Commercial (CG). Per the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, Title 21A.31, the G-MU District is intended to: Serve as an urban neighborhood that provides employment and economic development opportunities that are oriented toward the pedestrian with a strong emphasis on a safe and attractive streetscape; Have a mixed-use character with supportive retail, service commercial, office, and high density residential uses; Encourage urban-scale commercial development along the 200 South corridor; and Host a primarily residential corridor along 500 West, from North Temple to 400 South. Per the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, Title 21A.26, the CG District is intended to: Enhance the economic vitality of the City as a whole, encourage sustainable and profitable businesses, and create dynamic and vital business districts; Provide economic development opportunities through a mix of land uses, including retail sales and services, entertainment, office, residential, heavy commercial, and low intensities of manufacturing and warehouse uses; Include safe, convenient, and inviting connections that provide access to businesses from public sidewalks, bike paths, and streets; and Be accessed under a hierarchy that places the pedestrian first, bicycle second, and automobile third. The RDA is preparing an application to amend the zoning designation of select parcels from G-MU to Downtown Secondary Central Business District (D4) to accommodate the implementation of the Rio Grande District Vision & Implementation Plan; primarily, to allow for taller building heights. The G-MU zone allows for maximum heights of 90 feet with up to 180 feet possible with additional design review. A D4 designation would allow for building heights up to 200 feet by right with a potential height of 600 feet permitted with additional design review. The Mayor and City Council have both expressed support for increased buildings heights within the Rio Grande District and the necessary zoning changes will be in place before its collection phase is triggered. Per the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance, Title 21A.30, the D4 District is intended to: Foster an environment consistent with the area’s function as a housing, entertainment, cultural, convention, business, and retail section of the city that supports the Central Business District; and Contain development that supports the regional venues in the district, such as the Salt Palace Convention Center. 12Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City Map of Current and Proposed Zoning for Property Tax Increment Collection Parcels Figure 9. Map of current and proposed zoning for property tax increment collection parcels 15 Key Objectives Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Higher utilization of public transit Per 63N-3-603(1), a HTRZ proposal shall promote the following objectives: Increasing availability of housing, including affordable housing, and fulfillment of moderate income housing plans Promoting and encouraging development of owner-occupied housing The proposed Salt Lake Central HTRZ may be the most transit-rich site in the entire State of Utah and the convergence of FrontRunner, TRAX, local bus routes, Amtrak, and Greyhound services will offer compelling alternatives to a vehicle for those who live, work in, and visit the area. Planned future TRAX extensions will enhance rider options with direct connections to the Airport, U of U, and emerging Granary District. The broader UTA transit network provides access to event venues such as America First Field, the future ballpark being developed at Daybreak, and other higher education institutions via the FrontRunner line that runs from Ogden to Provo. As described on page 12, the RDA intends to utilize its HTRZ Tax Increment Reimbursement Policy to offset increased costs associated with affordable housing. Implementation of this policy will ensure that minimum affordable housing thresholds outlined in 63N-603-2 are not only met but surpassed. Tax increment generated with the HTRZ may also be utilized to support the RDA’s other various housing funding programs, which are developed in coordination with Salt Lake City and meant to support its moderate income housing plan, Housing SLC (2023). The Agency has published the Residential Wealth Building Pilot Program, which is aimed at helping low- to moderate-income families and individuals build wealth through affordable housing opportunities. This initiative is designed to address the homeownership gap in Salt Lake City and provide innovative pathways for economic stability. The Residential Wealth Building Pilot Program will offer funding for projects that create affordable homeownership and shared equity models, supporting the development of family and workforce housing. With an emphasis on promoting long-term financial stability and wealth accumulation, the program prioritizes housing development solutions such as rent-to-own units, condo or co-op conversions, tenant shared-equity models, and more. The initiative aligns with RDA’s goal of equitable economic growth, addressing systemic barriers to wealth for underserved communities. 16Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Improving efficiencies in parking and transportation, including walkability of communities near public transit facilities Overcoming development impediments and market conditions that render a development cost prohibitive absent the proposal and incentives Conserving water resources through efficient land use Improving air quality by reducing fuel consumption and motor vehicle trips The dense nature of the proposed developments within the HTRZ leads to water conservation via efficient landscape design and the lack of individual lawns requiring irrigation, as compared to single family or less- dense development. According to the EPA’s Protecting Water Resources with Higher-Density Development study, it has modeled that on a per housing unit basis, higher density developments produce less stormwater runoff and provide less impervious cover than low-density development. The decrease in stormwater runoff can assist in the reduction of downstream pollutants and toxins being deposited due to storm runoff which, combined with other efforts, seek to prevent the Great Salt Lake from further decline. The Rio Grande District - which will form the heart of the HTRZ near Salt Lake Central Station - is envisioned to become a model of urban-scale transit-oriented development for the State of Utah. The Vision & Implementation Plan prioritizes connectivity and accessibility with the creation of new mid-block streets, low-stress pedestrian and cyclist facilities, and a safe and walkable environment with highly activated ground floor spaces. The Plan also includes a shared parking garage that will concentrate parking at the perimeter of the Rio Grande District a) so that other land can be put to more efficient uses and b) to reduce the number of curb cuts and potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts within the core. Public parking spaces within the shared structure could be utilized by those accessing Salt Lake Central Station to take transit elsewhere. The RDA acknowledges that the level of density associated with transit-oriented development will incur substantial horizontal and vertical construction costs. Although interest rates have fallen, and are forecasted to continue to fall through 2025, they remain high enough to stall this caliber of development. The HTRZ will allow the RDA to fund critical infrastructure upgrades and offer eligible development projects a tax increment reimbursement to overcome increased costs and encourage more timely development. This is especially crucial given the timing of the 2034 Winter Olympics. The proximity and network breadth of Salt Lake Central Station provides viable alternatives to vehicle usage. By bringing uses such as office, retail, and housing within walking distance of each other, there are efficiencies that would not otherwise be viable. Salt Lake Central provides transit access to the wider Wasatch Front and can reduce vehicle trips. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), mixed-use development leads to 20% internal capture, or reduced vehicle trips, which directly lowers vehicle emissions. 17Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Encouraging transformative mixed-use development and investment in transportation and public transit infrastructure in strategic areas Strategic land use and municipal planning in major transit investment corridors as described in Subsection 10-9a-403(2) Increasing access to employment and educational opportunities Increasing access to child care These objectives perfectly encapsulate the vision for the area, and the HTRZ will be a key tool in bringing the many moving parts together to deliver on it. The Rio Grande District will raise the bar for development in Salt Lake City and Utah with unprecedented levels of density, mixed-use design, walkability, and sustainability. The proposed redevelopment of UTA’s Salt Lake Central Station will enhance the public transit experience at a primary gateway to the city, which is vital to providing lasting impressions for riders and growing ridership levels. Other initiatives such as the planned TRAX extensions, Green Loop, and 400 South Bikeway will only enhance the overall network and feasibility of its use to access jobs, shopping, recreational, and educational opportunities across the Wasatch Front. In addition, Salt Lake City was awarded nearly $2 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to study solutions for eliminating barriers caused by transportation infrastructure, and there is potential for this work to result in recommendations within the HTRZ. Local advocates have developed the concept of relocating freight and Frontrunner rails into an underground train trench (the “Rio Grande Plan” - not to be confused with the Rio Grande District Vision & Implementation Plan), which is one option that will be considered through this effort. The tax increment generated from the HTRZ can be used to support the development of residential, office, and retail spaces that would otherwise not be built at this time due to the current cost prohibitive market conditions. Jobs will be created within the HTRZ through the construction of these new spaces. The RDA intends to partner with organizations such as EDCUtah, the Salt Lake Chamber, and the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity to find the optimal developers and tenants. In addition, residents of the HTRZ can utilize adjacent transit infrastructure to access job centers and educational institutions across the Wasatch Front. Many universities and colleges have partnered with UTA to provide their enrolled students with free transit access. Salt Lake City has identified a need for more child care facilities in the city, and tax increment generated from the HTRZ could be used to incentivize their inclusion in residential or commercial developments within the HTRZ. Additionally, the Agency has a Housing Development Loan Program that provides competitive low-interest loans to projects that meet certain project priorities, one of which is affordable family housing with amenities for children. 18 Property Tax Increment Budget Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ It is proposed that the HTRZ’s 162 parcels would be triggered for tax increment collection over two, 25- year collection phases during the total 45-year term. This phased approach accommodates the readiness of some developers to begin construction in the next few years while anticipating that it will take longer for plans to be established for other parcels in the HTRZ. Where development-specific information is available, those details have been included in the budget calculations. However, for parcels where development details are yet to be finalized, development was modeled using zoning standards and industry-specific floor- to-area ratios to determine their highest and best uses. Phase 1 includes private development projects that are anticipated to commence in the near-term, several of which incorporate market-rate and affordable housing. Phase 2 includes the planned redevelopment of RDA and UTA-owned property*, as well as other sites that have high redevelopment potential but are too early in their planning processes to have finalized numbers. Attachment B provides the development absorption, construction, and assessed value estimates for both phases. *Please note that UTA plans to subdivide the large parcels under its ownership before Phase 2 is triggered. 25.79 UTA-owned acres have been included in this proposal. Figure 10. Map of proposed HTRZ boundary and collection parcels, by phase 19Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Sources Uses Over the HTRZ term, it is projected that a total of $722,903,684 in property tax increment will be generated. With an 80% taxing entity participation rate, $578,322,947 may be available to support HTRZ development. Projected tax increment generation has been broken down by taxing entity below. See Attachment C for more information on base year values that were used in these calculations. The RDA proposes to utilize 98% of the tax increment funds generated within the HTRZ to support development projects by incentivizing high levels of public benefit and investing in surrounding infrastructure. The remaining 2% of the budget will cover costs associated with administration of the HTRZ. See Attachment C for a more detailed tax increment budget. Taxing Entity 100% Tax Increment ($) 80% Tax Increment ($) Salt Lake County 103,718,375 82,974,700 Salt Lake City School District 294,935,179 235,948,144 Salt Lake City 224,103,118 179,282,495 Salt Lake City Library 43,674,811 34,939,849 Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District 14,880,685 11,904,548 Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 11,830,145 9,464,116 Central Utah Water Conservancy District 29,761,370 23,809,096 TOTAL Property Tax Increment 722,903,684 578,322,947 Use of Funds Tax Increment ($) HTRZ Development Activities (98%)566,756,488 Administrative Costs (2%)11,566,459 TOTAL Available Property Tax Increment 578,322,947 Table 2. Projected property tax increment generation, by taxing entity Table 3. Proposed uses of property tax increment 20 Proposed Expenditures Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ A priority of the proposed HTRZ is to facilitate the buildout of two downtown projects that together have the potential to serve as the model of urban transit-oriented development for the State of Utah: the redevelopment of the RDA’s Rio Grande District assemblage and UTA’s Salt Lake Central Station area to the west. Both efforts will be carried out through public-private partnerships and as such, HTRZ tax increment will be used to support both public and private project components. Funding will also be made available to leverage other anticipated private investment throughout the HTRZ, which includes land with some of the highest development potential left in Salt Lake City. The following areas of proposed expenditure will help overcome development impediments inherent to the site and current market conditions, and enable the levels of density, walkability, accessibility, sustainability, and affordability envisioned for the area: Horizontal construction costs Enhanced vertical construction costs Structured shared parking Affordable housing Property acquisition costs Separately, the RDA anticipates supporting public initiatives that would enhance private development planned within the HTRZ area, such as potential light rail extensions and implementation of the Green Loop. Large-scale capital projects like these require multiple funding sources and the contribution of tax increment will not exceed the level of impact that the project will have on the HTRZ. The HTRZ is in dire need of underground and surface-level improvements to accommodate dense, walkable development. Due to historic industrial land uses, some sites will require environmental remediation. Water, electrical, sewer, and stormwater utilities will need to be upgraded to provide the capacity needed for the level of density that is encouraged by Salt Lake City Master Plans, The Rio Grande District Vision & Implementation Plan, and Salt Lake Central Station Area Plan. New and reconstructed streets will make the area surrounding Salt Lake Central Station more walkable, accessible, and safe for alternative mode users. Publicly accessible open spaces will provide areas of respite from the surrounding density. For the Rio Grande District, the RDA has commissioned an infrastructure design team that is pursuing Envision certification to prove a model of sustainable infrastructure that can be replicated by others in the HTRZ, City, and State. The estimated cost of planned utility and streetscape upgrades in the Rio Grande District, only, is approximately $25 million, and those costs will increase when extended to others areas of the HTRZ. Horizontal Construction Costs 21Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Through its work in developing the Rio Grande District Plan and regular communication with property owners and developers within the HTRZ area, the RDA is aware of the challenges of implementing a vision of this scale. The Rio Grande District is envisioned to contain taller buildings ranging from 75 feet to 400 feet in height. These structures will have specialized uses including life science space, corporate offices, retail, and residential towers. Due to the high water table and soil liquefaction potential, these taller structures will require additional engineering and stabilization enhancements to ensure site safety. Some or all of the structures may require a base isolator system to mitigate movement during earthquakes, which can lead to an additional cost. Due to the structural requirements of concrete and steel in buildings taller than seven stories, and the need for elevator and safety systems, this will have an impact on construction costs and possibly push projects into the cost-prohibitive zone absent the HTRZ and tax increment incentives. Additionally, the RDA will encourage new development within the HTRZ to be highly efficient, all- electric, and incorporate on-site renewables, where possible. Developers within the area have advised that to meet the expected sustainable building requirements, construction costs will be at least 2.33% higher than traditional construction would cost. The HTRZ tax increment may be used to offset this additional cost for developments that qualify for tax increment reimbursement agreements as a means to reduce carbon emissions and improve the region's air quality. Enhanced Vertical Construction Costs Structured Shared Parking In support of the HTRZ goal to enhance the efficiency of parking, it is anticipated that a large number of structured parking stalls will be constructed within the HTRZ. Due to the high water table at 6 to 8 feet in the area, and the high liquefaction potential of the soil, any parking structure will incur additional costs to stabilize and reinforce the structure against the current ground conditions. The RDA is exploring the option of constructing a 510-stall parking structure at the perimeter of the Rio Grande District at an estimated cost of $35 million. As the core of the District is envisioned to be pedestrian and bike friendly, this structure will allow vehicles to be parked on the edge of the Rio Grande District and allow visitors to walk to nearby destinations and access the Salt Lake Central FrontRunner Station. As future residential developments begin the planning phases, it is anticipated that they will contain their own parking structures, which may require the use of tax increment to support the structured parking costs. 22Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Affordable Housing Property Acquisition Costs 1: Cushman & Wakefield Apartment Market Report: Great Salt Lake Area Mid-Year 2023 2: CBRE Multifamily Market Report: Mid-Year 2023, Critical Data for Unsettled Times Supporting affordable housing is one of the RDA's top priorities. HTRZ code requires that at least 9% of housing units within the HTRZ be affordable to those earning 80% AMI and an additional 3% of housing units be affordable to those earning 60% AMI or below. The RDA will work to support additional affordable units through programs such as the RDA’s Housing Development Loan Program. Average Market Rate Monthly Rents The Cushman & Wakefield 2023 Multifamily Report indicates that the average monthly Salt Lake County one-bedroom rental rate is $1,514. In their Mid-Year Apartment Market Report, CBRE noted that the “Downtown submarket has the highest rents at $2,058 representing a weighted average of units with a rental rate 20% to 42% higher than suburban markets.” Using these two data sources, the average Salt Lake County monthly rent for a one-bedroom apartment was inflated by 31% to account for the difference between rental rates in downtown Salt Lake City and those in Salt Lake County as a whole. Therefore, monthly rent was estimated to average $1,983 for a one-bedroom apartment in this downtown neighborhood. Affordable Monthly Rents In 2024, the monthly rent for a one-bedroom unit that is affordable to households earning 60% of the Salt Lake County AMI is $1,299; the monthly rent for a one-bedroom unit affordable to households earning 80% of the AMI is $1,733. Estimated Housing Revenues Using a 2.5% vacancy rate and an annual increase in rental rates of 3.0%, the estimated housing revenue over the term of the HTRZ - if all occupied residential units were market rate - is $5.26 billion. Using the HTRZ affordable housing requirements for 9% of units to be affordable to households earning 80% AMI and 3% of the units to be affordable to households earning 60% AMI, the estimated housing revenue is $517.82 million. Therefore, including affordable housing at levels that meet the HTRZ requirements creates a housing revenue gap of $114.38 million. See Attachment D for additional affordable housing gap analysis details. In addition to the financial gap resulting from reduced rental housing revenue, apartment units subject to rent restrictions generally have less value than comparable market rate units. This creates a capitalized value differential, further increasing the financial gap for affordable housing. The RDA intends to uses HTRZ tax increment and programs such as the RDA’s Housing Development Loan Program to help bridge the gap created by reduced rental revenue and capitalized value for affordable housing projects. 1 2 Recent appraisals have valued land within the HTRZ at $6.6 million/acre. The Agency may acquire distressed property within the HTRZ to further activate or complement existing projects. The Agency may also acquire distressed land to conduct environmental cleanup or contribute to environmental remediation efforts on contaminated land. 23 Alternative Funding Sources Participating HTRZ tax increment will be leveraged with various other federal, state, and locally offered funding programs to maximize the reach and impact of development activities and reduce the financial gap. A menu of applicable options is outlined below: Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC) The LIHTC program provides a federal tax incentive to construct or rehabilitate affordable rental housing with below-market rents. Salt Lake City Housing Development Loan Program (HDLP) The HDLP provides low-cost gap financing to incentivize the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of affordable housing within municipal boundaries. Transit Transportation Investment Fund (TTIF) TTIF funds are administered by the Utah Transportation Commission and used to construct transit or first/last mile capacity projects. Utah State Infrastructure Bank (SIB) The SIB offers low-cost infrastructure loans to public entities for acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, equipping, or fixturing transportation projects that are part of a state, regional, or local general or transportation plan, or economic development initiative. Funds can also be used to improve sewer or water infrastructure that is owned by a public entity. EPA Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund Salt Lake County administers a revolving fund that offers loans from $10,000 to $500,000 to entities redeveloping qualified brownfield sites. Salt Lake City Neighborhood Building Improvement Program (NBIP) The NBIP provides grants up to $50,000 to Salt Lake City business and commercial property owners to make façade improvements that increase street appeal, positively affect the surrounding neighborhood, and boost the economy on a local level. Salt Lake City Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) The EDLF provides loans up to $300,000 for the purposes of stimulating business development and expansion, creating employment opportunities, encouraging private investment, promoting economic development, and enhancing neighborhood vitality and commercial enterprise in Salt Lake City. Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) The C-PACE program, supported by the State, provides financing options with long-term repayment options to help businesses afford energy efficiency upgrades and the installation of renewable energy systems, with the goal to help improve Utah’s air quality by reducing overall carbon footprint. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ 24 Sales & Use Tax Increment Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Sales & Use Tax Collection Boundary The SLC RDA coordinated with the Utah State Tax Commission to set the proposed sales & use tax collection boundary shown in the map below, which includes a majority of the proposed property tax increment collection parcels. Figure 11. Map of proposed sales & use tax collection boundary 25Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ Sales & Use Tax Base Year Value The estimated 2028 sales & use tax base year value was calculated using the $11,996,574,173 total 2023 taxable sales for Salt Lake City. Using the City's total taxable sales and acreage, a proportion was created to determine an approximate base year taxable sales value for the HTRZ. The HTRZ represents 0.16% of Salt Lake City acreage and was assumed to account for 0.16% of taxable sales, providing a taxable sales base year value of $19,742,787. This sales and use base year value is included as an estimate only. Per the HTRZ Act, the Utah State Tax Commission will determine the actual sales & use tax base year value. The sales & use tax information included here is included only as a projection. Any sales and use tax information provided by the Utah State Tax Commission will supersede the estimate included in the HTRZ application. Sales & Use Tax Base Year Estimated Base Year Value (taxable sales) Incremental Taxable Sales Estimated Sales Tax to TTIF Sales Tax Generation The Salt Lake City commercial gross taxable sales were divided by the City's estimated commercial square footage to calculate an average commercial sales per square foot value of $251. Online sales per resident are estimated to be $2,301 per year. Using the projected absorption of residential and commercial development, taxable sales were projected for the HTRZ term. A 3% annual growth rate was applied to taxable sales. The total incremental taxable sales during the HTRZ term is projected to be $4,938,013,012, or an average of $176,357,608 per year. The sales and use tax generated over the full term is estimated to be $213,640,452. The 15% set aside of the sales and use tax for the Transit Transportation Investment Fund (TTIF) is estimated at $32,046,068. Attachment G includes additional details regarding the estimated sales tax generation. TY 2028 $19,742,787 $4,938,013,012 $32,046,068 Attachment A List of Property Tax Increment Collection Parcels Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Parcel List tax_dist_1 x Parcel Number Legal Description Phase Tax Area Acres 15011080320000 MCCARTHEYS 1S 0907LOT 2, MCCARTHEY'S SUB. 1 01N 21,250,405 3.390 100%3.39 15011520260000 2 01N 4,895,092 1.350 95%1.28 15011510210000 2 01N - 0.739 97%0.72 15011520250000 2 01N - 0.560 97%0.55 15011520210000 2 01N 4,055,140 1.650 97%1.61 15013020180000 0917 2 01N - 0.600 0%0.00 15013020190000 06457389-1673 8599-0917 2 01N - 0.160 0%0.00 15013020200000 RDS TO BEG. 0.31 AC M OR L. 3914-0131 5036-0001 5117-1156 5686-0645 7389-1673 8597-0917 2 01N - 0.310 0%0.00 15013020170000 TO BEG. 3997-0484 5355-1358 8599-0921 2 01N - 0.930 50%0.47 15013020210000 2053 8599-0917 2 01N - 0.320 50%0.16 15011510050000 2 01N - 0.310 0%0.00 15011510080000 2 01N - 0.490 69%0.34 15011510200000 2 01H - 0.360 69%0.25 15011510090000 2 01N - 0.500 0%0.00 15011510100000 2 01N - 0.880 0%0.00 15011510110000 2 01N - 0.110 0%0.00 15011510120000 2 01N - 0.260 0%0.00 15011510130000 2 01N - 0.130 0%0.00 15011510140000 2 01N - 0.130 0%0.00 15011520120000 2 01N - 0.110 0%0.00 15011520130000 2 01N - 0.130 0%0.00 15011520140000 2 01N - 0.130 0%0.00 15011530120000 46, PLAT A, SLC SUR;W 5 RDS; S 20 RDS; E 6 RDS; N 20 RDS; W 1 RD TO BEG. 3.24 ACM OR L. 6973-2960 2 01N 6,116,100 3.240 0%0.00 15013020070000 2 01N - 0.630 95%0.60 15013020080000 2 01N - 0.480 95%0.46 15013020090000 2 01N - 0.160 95%0.15 15013020100000 2 01N - 0.180 95%0.17 15013020110000 2 01N - 0.140 95%0.13 15013020130000 2 01N - 0.160 95%0.15 15013020220000 8599-0917 2 01N - 1.250 92%1.15 15011080350000 1 01N 4,044,865 0.380 100%0.38 15011510190000 165.00 FT; W 113.50 FT; N 165.00 FT TO BEG. (BEING PT OF LOT 5, BLK 63, PLAT A, SLC SUR). 2 01N 5,617,920 0.430 100%0.43 15011510150000 WITH 4 FT STRIP VACATED ST ABUTTING ON W. 7183-1759 1763 8681-2569 09799-6817 2 01N 6,093,120 0.460 100%0.46 15011080340000 MCCARTHEYS 1S 0104LOT 3, MCCARTHEY'S SUB. 10332-9309 10469-2695 10753-0416 1 01N 17,342,985 1.240 100%1.24 15011080370000 1 01N 18,753,161 0.590 95%0.56 15011780020000 1 01N 11,613,470 1.170 100%1.17 15013790180000 2 02A 895,100 0.370 75%0.28 15013790200000 0^01' W 42.89 FT TO BEG. 8665-1132 2 02A 602,500 0.260 75%0.20 15013790240000 2 02A 1,938,400 0.890 75%0.67 15011520240000 2 01N 2,520,197 0.290 95%0.28 15121070010000 1 13 15,113,900 5.110 0%0.00 15011030100000 FT M OR L TO BEG.7026-1564 9272-3163 9595-9152 9601-8556 10358-1035 10555-8494 2 01P 372,900 0.160 75%0.12 15011030050000 2 01P - 0.080 75%0.06 15011030060000 2 01P 272,200 0.060 75%0.05 15011030130000 FT; S 165 FT TO BEG. 4932-0842 7026-1564 09528-0835 2 01P 116,300 0.100 75%0.08 15011030170000 2 01P - 0.130 75%0.10 15011030200000 2 01P - 0.100 75%0.08 15011030210000 0.37 AC M OR L. 5530-1460 5648-0129 8511-4748 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.370 75%0.28 15011030220000 S 330 FT TO BEG. 0.50 AC M OR L. 4801-0763 6061-1524 8511-4746 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.500 75%0.38 15011030230000 0.34 AC M OR L. 5530-1460 5648-0129 8511-4747 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.340 75%0.26 15011040130000 165 FT TO BEG. 0.31 AC M OR L. 3927-0114 6597-0906,0907 9079-3271,3274 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.310 75%0.23 15011040140000 FT TO BEG. 0.27 AC M OR L. 3927-0114 6597-0906,0907 9079-3271,3274 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.270 75%0.20 15011040150000 W 20 FT TO BEG. 0.08 AC M OR L. 6654-2203 8834-4656 9079-3271,3274 9648-8971 9671-0001 2 01P - 0.080 75%0.06 15011040160000 290.14 FT; N 89^58'14" E 165.10 FT; S 0^01' E 290.13 FT TO BEG. 2 01P 3,360,200 1.100 75%0.83 15013040010000 15011070080000 2 01N 1,116,800 0.280 75%0.21 15011070090000 2 01N 503,300 0.120 75%0.09 15011070220000 280.38 FT TO BEG. 0.0348 AC 2 01N - 0.030 75%0.02 15011070340000 FT; N 165 FT TO BEG. 0.20 AC M OR L. 5225-0800 5652-0863 5783-1185,1188 9648-8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.200 75%0.15 15011070350000 165 FT TO BEG. 0.01 AC M OR L. 5225-0800 5652-0863 5783-1185 THRU 1191 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.010 75%0.01 15011070360000 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.160 75%0.12 15011070370000 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.160 75%0.12 15011070380000 AC M OR L. 4768-0154 6042-2712 9648-8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.340 75%0.26 15011070390000 FT; N 165 FT TO BEG. 0.19 AC M OR L. 4768-0154 6042-2712 9648-8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.190 75%0.14 15011070400000 8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.220 75%0.17 15011070410000 132 FT TO BEG. LESS RR. 0.25 AC M OR L. 5652-0863 5783-1185,1188 9648-8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.250 75%0.19 15011070420000 82.50 FT TO BEG. 0.25 AC M OR L. 5652-0863 5783-1185,1188 9648-8976 9671-0001 2 01N - 0.250 75%0.19 15011080110000 1 01N 216,200 0.060 75%0.05 15011080120000 1 01N 1,089,100 0.170 75%0.13 15011080130000 1 01N 232,600 0.120 75%0.09 15013030010000 2 13 600,900 0.310 65%0.20 15013030020000 2 13 252,000 0.130 65%0.08 15013030030000 2 13 368,300 0.190 65%0.12 15013030040000 2 13 368,300 0.190 65%0.12 15013030050000 2 13 232,600 0.120 65%0.08 15013030060000 2 13 69,800 0.060 65%0.04 15013030070000 2 13 290,800 0.250 65%0.16 15013030080000 2 13 197,700 0.170 65%0.11 15013030090000 2 13 93,100 0.080 65%0.05 15013030100000 2 13 2,244,900 0.240 65%0.16 15013030110000 REV TRUST) 2 13 373,300 0.120 65%0.08 15013030150000 2 13 187,900 0.160 65%0.10 15013030160000 2 13 186,100 0.160 65%0.10 15013030170000 2 13 2,677,200 1.620 65%1.05 15013030180000 2 13 467,300 0.400 65%0.26 15013040030000 409COM AT SE COR LOT 7 BLK 45 PLAT A SLC SUR N 5.5 RDS W 16 RDSS 5.5 RDS E 16 RDS TO BEG 6052-0377 2 13 1,078,200 0.550 65%0.36 15013040040000 0396 6253-2476 2 13 759,500 0.610 65%0.40 15013040070000 5151 2 13 2,264,100 1.890 65%1.23 15013300070000 1 13 1,842,800 0.750 65%0.49 15013300080000 1 13 2,091,700 1.120 65%0.73 15013520060000 1 13 1,193,700 0.310 65%0.20 15013520070000 1 13 142,100 0.150 65%0.10 15013520100000 1 13 397,900 0.420 65%0.27 15013520190000 1791 5655-1795 6241-1302 7872-0699 7879-1326 09539-3217 10835-1822 11222-8833 1 13 992,100 0.160 65%0.10 15013520200000 1 13 252,600 0.160 65%0.10 15013520210000 1 13 300,000 0.190 65%0.12 15013520220000 5567-1886 6331-497 6331-0498 7872-0699 7879-1326 09539-3217 10835-1822 11222-8833 1 13 151,600 0.160 65%0.10 15013520230000 1 13 1,945,400 0.590 65%0.38 15013520310000 FT; W 82.5 FT;S 330 FT; W 82.5 FT TO BEG. 5872-2748 THRU 2750 7554-1939 10196-6017 1 13 2,599,900 2.170 65%1.41 15013520370000 1 13 369,500 0.390 65%0.25 15013520380000 1 13 3,178,600 2.490 65%1.62 15014040050000 1 13 1,952,300 0.610 65%0.40 15014040060000 1 13 2,742,100 0.850 65%0.55 15015010370000 W 61.2 FT; W 10.4 FTM OR L; S 330 FT TO BEG. 2 01N - 0.500 75%0.38 15121270130000 2 02A 2,983,900 1.370 65%0.89 15013540050000 SIXTH SOUTH COMMERCIAL 1S 0501LOT 2, SIXTH SOUTH COMMERCIAL SUB 10517-1225 10680-3758 1 13 1,688,000 1.020 65%0.66 15013540010000 1 13 4,931,100 1.640 65%1.07 15011520230000 89^53'08" E 348.62 FT; N 0^03'32" W 165.07 FT TO BEG. 08367-3456 2 01N 4,964,352 1.320 95%1.25 15013290010000 15013290020000 0002 1 13 100,100 0.040 83%0.03 15013290030000 1 13 3,141,600 2.330 83%1.93 15013290060000 15013290070000 15013290080000 15013300090000 1 13 1,854,400 0.560 65%0.36 15013300100000 1 13 77,000 0.050 65%0.03 15013300110000 1 13 - 0.130 65%0.08 15013300170000 1 13 32,000 0.010 65%0.01 15013300190000 1 13 64,000 0.020 65%0.01 15013300230000 1 13 2,924,200 0.500 65%0.33 15013300240000 1 13 1,851,200 0.570 65%0.37 15013780080000 1 13 32,000 0.010 65%0.01 15013780070000 1 13 732,200 0.140 65%0.09 15013780280000 1 13 7,909,220 0.440 65%0.29 15013780290000 BLK 30, PLAT A, SLC SUR). 10944-2135 1 13 452,700 0.480 65%0.31 15013780300000 1 13 1,251,700 0.350 65%0.23 15014040070000 1 13 3,395,200 1.050 65%0.68 15014040080000 1 13 192,100 0.060 65%0.04 15014040110000 1 13 512,300 0.160 65%0.10 15014040120000 1 13 3,591,100 0.870 65%0.57 15013780270000 1 13 16,064,100 3.110 0%0.00 15013760100000 15013760020000 1 - 0.000 57%0.00 15013760040000 1 13 3,067,100 0.310 57%0.18 15013760050000 1 - 0.000 57%0.00 15013760060000 1 - 0.000 57%0.00 15013760070000 1 - 0.000 57%0.00 15013760090000 15013770080000 1 13 862,700 0.220 57%0.13 15013770090000 1 13 815,700 0.220 57%0.13 15013770100000 1 13 749,600 0.190 57%0.11 15013770110000 1 13 999,000 0.630 57%0.36 15013770130000 1 13 4,629,600 0.960 57%0.55 15013770140000 1 13 742,500 0.210 57%0.12 15013770160000 214LOT 8, BLK 29, PLAT A, SLC SUR. 6239-2407 9035-6727,6830 09080-0001 1 13 1,764,100 1.250 57%0.72 15013770170000 BLK 029 PLAT A P 0627LOTS 2 & 3, BLK 29, PLAT A, SLC SUR. 10814-5642 1 13 4,247,000 2.500 57%1.44 15013770120000 10392-6075 1 13 4,035,460 0.630 57%0.36 15013260020000 1 01N 3,328,900 0.510 100%0.51 15013260080000 1 01N 368,500 0.180 100%0.18 15013260090000 1 01N 821,535 0.900 100%0.90 15011530130000 2 01N - 0.739 0%0.00 15011530040000 2 01N - 0.180 0%0.00 15011530050000 2 01N - 0.160 0%0.00 15011530060000 2 01N - 0.130 0%0.00 15011530090000 8218-0001 8359-2106 2 01N - 0.590 0%0.00 15011530100000 150 FT TO BEG. 3914-0131 5036-0001 5117-1156 5686-0645 7389-1673 8599-0917 2 01N - 0.190 0%0.00 15011530110000 6411-1796 7389-1673 8599-0917 2 01N - 0.060 0%0.00 15011070240000 2 01N - 7.290 50%3.65 15011090062000 2 01P - 11.300 100%11.30 15022780120000 2 01P - 7.200 0%0.00 TOTALS:262,744,538 116.71 69.79 Attachment B Development Details + Absorption Schedule Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Development Details & Absorption Schedule Commercial:Yes 80% Unit Types # Stories (Y:0,N:1)Inflation Residential Commercial Phase Today's Dollars per Unit or Cost ($) YR Built Dollars per Unit or Cost ($) SF (if non-res)Cost Assessed Value Land Use Block 1: Central West Apartments: MF 6 1 2.00%Yes No 55% 6 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 350,000 33,594 65 22,750,000 5,617,920 Residential/MF 1 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 34 1,870,000 Parking 3 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 350,000 18 6,300,000 Residential/MF 3 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 175 20,000 20,000 3,500,000 Commercial 4 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 320,000 13 4,160,000 Residential/MF 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 175 40,000 40,000 7,000,000 Commercial 3 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 302,807 62 18,774,027 10,325,715 Residential/MF 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 150 40,000 40,000 6,000,000 Commercial 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 - - Parking 5 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 400,000 203 81,200,000 44,660,000 Residential/MF 2 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 123 6,765,000 3,720,750 Parking 6 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 150 60,000,000 18,753,161 Residential/MF 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 250 1,000 1,000 250,000 Commercial 2 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 123 6,765,000 3,720,750 Parking 5 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 288 115,200,000 63,360,000 Residential/MF 2 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 373 20,515,000 11,283,250 Parking 5 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 205 82,000,000 45,100,000 Residential/MF 2 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 59,000 57,400 144 8,466,500 6,773,200 Parking 5 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 375,000 220 82,500,000 45,375,000 Residential/MF 2 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 55,000 120,000 123 6,765,000 3,720,750 Parking 6 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 230,000 61 14,030,000 4,044,865 Residential/MF 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 412,000.0 394 162,333,933 89,283,663 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 600 618.0 312,691 312,691 193,243,102 154,594,482 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 450 463.5 26,058 26,058 12,077,694 9,662,155 Commercial 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 412,000.0 16 6,575,520 3,616,536 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 600 618.0 7,318 7,318 4,522,573 3,618,059 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 450 463.5 915 915 423,991 339,193 Commercial 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 400,000 412,000.0 132 54,219,859 29,820,923 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 600 618.0 104,439 104,439 64,543,584 51,634,867 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 450 463.5 5,802 5,802 2,689,316 2,151,453 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 325 355 123,500 123,500 43,859,330 35,087,464 Commercial 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 325,000 355,136 661 234,745,078 129,109,793 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 20,000 21,855 785 17,155,814 13,724,651 Parking 1 2.00%Yes No 55%1 300,000 327,818 520 170,465,412 93,755,977 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 350 382 123,500 123,500 47,233,125 37,786,500 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 350,000 382,454 150 57,368,168 45,894,534 Hotel 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 350 382 200,000 200,000 76,490,890 61,192,712 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 558 610 23,000 23,000 14,024,058 11,219,247 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 45,000 49,173 842 41,403,426 33,122,741 Parking 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 350 382 353,000 353,000 135,006,421 108,005,137 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%1 681 744 40,000 40,000 29,765,883 23,812,707 Office 38 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 437,091 542,000 590 257,783,693 141,781,031 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 55,000 60,100 120,000 300 18,029,996 14,423,996 Parking 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 23,000 23,000 8,796,452 7,037,162 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 250 273 16,000 16,000 4,370,908 3,496,726 Makers Space 3 0 2.00%No Yes 80%2 - 110,000 32,000,000 - Climbing Gym 2 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 650 710 5,000 5,000 3,551,363 2,841,090 Commercial 1 0 2.00%No Yes 80%2 650 710 5,000 5,000 3,551,363 - Office 6 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 55,000 60,100 34,000 510 30,650,992 24,520,794 Parking 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 14,000 14,000 5,354,362 4,283,490 Commercial 12 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 437,091 156,000 170 74,196,044 40,807,824 Residential/MF 17 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 437,091 309,000 336 146,965,242 80,830,883 Residential/MF 7 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 300,000 327,818 86,000 215 70,480,892 56,384,713 Parking 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 7,000 7,000 2,677,181 2,141,745 Commercial 11 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 316,000 316,000 120,855,606 96,684,485 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 27,000 27,000 10,326,270 8,261,016 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 8,000 8,000 3,059,636 2,447,708 Makers Space 21 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 524,000 524,000 200,406,132 160,324,905 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 27,000 27,000 10,326,270 8,261,016 Commercial 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 8,000 8,000 3,059,636 2,447,708 Makers Space 14 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 550 601 318,500 318,500 191,418,452 153,134,762 Office 10 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350,000 382,454 175 66,929,529 53,543,623 Hotel 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 27,000 27,000 10,326,270 8,261,016 Makers Space 18 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 350 382 179,000 179,000 68,459,347 54,767,477 Office 11 0 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 437,091 212,000 231 100,830,522 - Residential/MF 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 450 492 82,000 82,000 40,321,626 22,176,894 Office 5 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 628 285,000 285,000 178,989,666 143,191,733 Office 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 628 23,000 23,000 14,444,780 11,555,824 Commercial 1 0 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 628 13,500 13,500 8,478,458 - Not public information 3 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 66,405 188,000 600 39,843,012 31,874,409 Parking 0 0 2.00%No Yes 80%2 125 141 50,000 50,000 7,034,430 - Not public information 0 0 2.00%No Yes 80%2 125 141 75,000 75,000 10,551,645 - Not public information 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 463,710 309,000 350 162,298,370 89,264,104 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 68,397 160,000 435 29,752,769 23,802,215 Parking 3 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 628 70,000.00 70,000.00 43,962,374 35,169,899 Office 3 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 66,405 150,000 420 27,890,108 22,312,087 Parking 3 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 666 94,000.00 94,000.00 62,630,431 50,104,345 Office 1 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 558 666 2,600.00 2,600 1,732,331 1,385,865 Commercial 2 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 70,449 94,000 122 8,594,788 6,875,831 Parking 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 477,621 309,000 106 50,627,817 27,845,300 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 70,449 160,000 90 6,340,418 5,072,334 Parking 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 477,621 309,000 110 52,538,301 28,896,066 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 70,449 90,000 95 6,692,663 5,354,130 Parking 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 506,708 309,000 200 101,341,607 55,737,884 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 59,000 74,739 90,000 169 12,630,964 10,104,772 Parking 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 450203.524 341 153,367,413 84,352,077 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 600 675 270,351 270,351 182,569,314 146,055,451 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 450 506 16,492 16,492 8,352,758 6,682,206 Commercial 1 2.00%Yes No 55%2 400,000 450,204 288 129,539,761 71,246,869 Residential/MF 1 2.00%No Yes 80%2 600 675 131,935 131,935 89,096,084 71,276,867 Office 1 2.00%No Yes 80% Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Development Summary PHASE 1 Units Construction Cost Assessed Value Residential Units 3,073 1,138,978,829 588,916,672 Commercial SF 403,775 137,057,514 96,246,011 Office SF 1,017,449 503,572,454 402,857,963 Hotel Rooms 150 57,368,168 45,894,534 Structure Park Stalls 2,547 109,705,740 76,066,092 PHASE 1 TOTAL 1,946,682,704 1,209,981,272 PHASE 2 Units Construction Cost Assessed Value Residential Units 2,721 1,229,488,770 620,762,037 No Assessed Value (Public/UTA/Non profit/etc)58,064,533 - Commercial SF 161,584 73,914,526 59,131,621 Makers Space 59,000 20,816,449 16,653,159 Office SF 2,275,785 1,182,260,395 932,886,819 Hotel Rooms 175 66,929,529 53,543,623 Structure Park Stalls 2,956 250,906,602 200,725,282 PHASE 2 TOTAL 2,882,380,804 1,883,702,541 TOTAL (ALL PHASES)Units Construction Cost Assessed Value Residential Units 5,793 2,368,467,599 1,209,678,708 No Assessed Value (Public/UTA/Non profit/etc)58,064,533 - Commercial SF 565,358 210,972,040 155,377,632 Makers Space 59,000 20,816,449 16,653,159 Office SF 3,293,234 1,685,832,849 1,335,744,782 Hotel Rooms 325 124,297,696 99,438,157 Structure Park Stalls 5,503 360,612,342 276,791,374 TOTAL 4,829,063,508 3,093,683,813 Attachment C Property Tax Increment Budget + Base Year Values REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY 4% Rate Rate Rate Participation: Phase III Property Tax Increment Budget 80%80%80%80%80% INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS:YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Phase 1 Assessed Value 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 Phase 2 Assessed Value 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 1,883,702,541 Projected Total Assessed Value 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 1,209,981,272 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 3,093,683,813 Phase 1 Base Year Value (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) - - - Phase 2 Base Year Value - - - (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (Less Total Base Year Value)(199,610,301) (199,610,301) (199,610,301) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (262,744,538) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) (63,134,237) TOTAL INCREMENTAL VALUE:1,010,370,971 1,010,370,971 1,010,370,971 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 2,830,939,275 3,030,549,576 3,030,549,576 3,030,549,576 Tax Year YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Incremental Property Tax by Taxing Entity 2023 TOTALS NPV (4%) Salt Lake County 0.001394 1,408,457 1,408,457 1,408,457 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 3,946,329 4,224,586 4,224,586 4,224,586 103,718,375 59,004,770 Salt Lake City School District 0.003964 4,005,111 4,005,111 4,005,111 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 11,221,843 12,013,099 12,013,099 12,013,099 294,935,179 167,786,877 Salt Lake City 0.003012 3,043,237 3,043,237 3,043,237 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 8,526,789 9,128,015 9,128,015 9,128,015 224,103,118 127,490,937 Salt Lake City Library 0.000587 593,088 593,088 593,088 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,661,761 1,778,933 1,778,933 1,778,933 43,674,811 24,846,341 Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District -Salt Lake 0.000200 202,074 202,074 202,074 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 566,188 606,110 606,110 606,110 14,880,685 8,465,534 Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 0.000159 160,649 160,649 160,649 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 450,119 481,857 481,857 481,857 11,830,145 6,730,099 Central Utah Water Conservancy District 0.000400 404,148 404,148 404,148 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,132,376 1,212,220 1,212,220 1,212,220 29,761,370 16,931,067 TOTAL INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX:0.009716 9,816,764 9,816,764 9,816,764 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 27,505,406 29,444,820 29,444,820 29,444,820 722,903,684 411,255,625 Property Tax Participation Rate by Taxing Entity Salt Lake County 80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80% Property Tax Increment Participation by Taxing Entity YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 TOTALS NPV Salt Lake County 1,126,766 1,126,766 1,126,766 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,157,063 3,379,669 3,379,669 3,379,669 82,974,700 47,203,816 Salt Lake City School District 3,204,088 3,204,088 3,204,088 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 8,977,475 9,610,479 9,610,479 9,610,479 235,948,144 134,229,502 Salt Lake City 2,434,590 2,434,590 2,434,590 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 6,821,431 7,302,412 7,302,412 7,302,412 179,282,495 101,992,750 Salt Lake City Library 474,470 474,470 474,470 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,329,409 1,423,146 1,423,146 1,423,146 34,939,849 19,877,073 Salt Lake Metropolitan Water District -Salt Lake 161,659 161,659 161,659 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 452,950 484,888 484,888 484,888 11,904,548 6,772,427 Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District 128,519 128,519 128,519 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 360,095 385,486 385,486 385,486 9,464,116 5,384,079 Central Utah Water Conservancy District 323,319 323,319 323,319 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 905,901 969,776 969,776 969,776 23,809,096 13,544,854 TOTAL PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT FOR BUDGET: 7,853,411 7,853,411 7,853,411 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 23,555,856 23,555,856 23,555,856 578,322,947 329,004,500 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 TOTALS NPV Admin Fee 2%157,068 157,068 157,068 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 440,086 471,117 471,117 471,117 11,566,459 6,580,090 HTRZ Development Activities 98%7,696,343 7,696,343 7,696,343 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 21,564,238 23,084,739 23,084,739 23,084,739 566,756,488 322,424,410 TOTAL USE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS:7,853,411 7,853,411 7,853,411 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 22,004,325 23,555,856 23,555,856 23,555,856 578,322,947 329,004,500 Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Base Year Value Base Year Value by Tax Area TY2024 TY2024 13 137,259,296.00$ 1 199,610,301.00$ 114,943,742.00$ 2 63,134,237.00$ 4,121,600.00$ Total Base Year Property Value 262,744,538$ 02A 6,419,900.00$ Total Base Year Property Value 262,744,538$ TRUE NOTE: Taxing entities and tax rates are the same for all included tax districts.TRUE BASE YEAR VALUE Tax Year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 -1 -1 -1 Base Year Taxable Value by Phase Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Phase 1 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 TOTAL BASE YEAR VALUE:199,610,301 199,610,301 199,610,301 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 262,744,538 63,134,237 63,134,237 63,134,237 Tax Year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2023 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 Year 21 Year 22 Year 23 Year 24 Year 25 Year 26 Year 27 Year 28 Salt Lake County 0.001394 278,257 278,257 278,257 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 366,266 88,009 88,009 88,009 0.003964 791,255 791,255 791,255 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 1,041,519 250,264 250,264 250,264 0.003012 601,226 601,226 601,226 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 791,387 190,160 190,160 190,160 0.000587 117,171 117,171 117,171 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 154,231 37,060 37,060 37,060 0.000200 39,922 39,922 39,922 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 52,549 12,627 12,627 12,627 0.000159 31,738 31,738 31,738 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 41,776 10,038 10,038 10,038 0.000400 79,844 79,844 79,844 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 105,098 25,254 25,254 25,254 TOTAL BASE YEAR PROPERTY TAXES:0.009716 1,939,414 1,939,414 1,939,414 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 2,552,826 613,412 613,412 613,412 Attachment D Affordable Housing Gap Analysis Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Affordable Housing Gap Analysis Make sure term accounts for all phases. Assumptions & Summary Monthly Rent Multifamily Average Rent (Cushman & Wakefield 2023 Multifamily Report)$23,800 $1,983 <-- Weighted ave of all unit types is $2,058, 1 bdrm is: $1514. CBRE ave for SLCity is $1,555. Still higher than the 80% AMI for SL County. 2024 SL County 60% AMI, 1 Bedroom Rent Limit (NOVOGRADAC)$15,588 $1,299 <-- Make sure the 80s & 60s flow through correctly 2024 SL County 80% AMI, 1 Bedroom Rent Limit (NOVOGRADAC)$20,796 $1,733 Include the quote from CBRE re: 20%-42% higher lingo to justify rent. Take market rate x by 20-42% to increase the market rate rent for the analysis Total Residential Units 5,793 80% AMI Affordable Housing Component (%)9.0% Affordable Units: 80% AMI (#)521 60% AMI Affordable Housing Component (%)3.0% Affordable Units: 60% AMI (#)174 Total Affordable Units (Private Development & Public Benefit)695 Total over Project Residential Vacancy Rate (Cushman & Wakefield 2023)2.50% Term Years Average Annual Affordable Housing Rent Gap $4,209,813 $105,245,318 Additional Assumptions Rent Growth (HDLP Submissions)3.0% Average Household Size (Census, 2022 ACS 1 YR Estimate, S1101)2.17 Time Indexed Rents ($)/SF Base Year YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Market Rent per Unit per Year 23,800 24,514 25,250 26,007 26,787 27,591 28,419 29,271 30,149 31,054 31,985 32,945 33,933 34,951 36,000 37,080 38,192 39,338 40,518 41,734 42,986 44,275 45,603 46,972 48,381 49,832 51,327 52,867 54,453 60% AMI, 1 Bedroom Rent Limit 15,588 16,056 16,537 17,033 17,544 18,071 18,613 19,171 19,746 20,339 20,949 21,577 22,225 22,892 23,578 24,286 25,014 25,765 26,538 27,334 28,154 28,998 29,868 30,764 31,687 32,638 33,617 34,625 35,664 60% AMI Unit Gap per Unit per Year 8,212 8,458 8,712 8,974 9,243 9,520 9,806 10,100 10,403 10,715 11,036 11,367 11,708 12,060 12,422 12,794 13,178 13,573 13,981 14,400 14,832 15,277 15,735 16,207 16,693 17,194 17,710 18,241 18,789 80% AMI, 1 Bedroom Rent Limit 20,796 21,420 22,062 22,724 23,406 24,108 24,832 25,576 26,344 27,134 27,948 28,787 29,650 30,540 31,456 32,399 33,371 34,373 35,404 36,466 37,560 38,687 39,847 41,043 42,274 43,542 44,848 46,194 47,580 80% AMI Unit Gap per Unit per Year 3,004 3,094 3,187 3,283 3,381 3,483 3,587 3,695 3,805 3,920 4,037 4,158 4,283 4,412 4,544 4,680 4,821 4,965 5,114 5,268 5,426 5,588 5,756 5,929 6,107 6,290 6,479 6,673 6,873 Absorption Projections 2024 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Residential Units by Phase Phase 1 Residential Units 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 Phase 2 Residential Units 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 Total Residential Units 3,073 3,073 3,073 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 2,721 2,721 2,721 Less: Vacancies:(77) (77) (77) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (145) (68) (68) (68) Occupied Residential Units 2,996 2,996 2,996 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 5,649 2,653 2,653 2,653 Market Rate Units 2,636 2,636 2,636 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 4,971 2,334 2,334 2,334 60% AMI Units 90 90 90 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 80 80 80 80% AMI Units 270 270 270 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 508 239 239 239 Annual Rents by Affordability Type TOTAL Market Rents at 100% of Occupied Units 5,268,361,649 73,438,347 75,641,497 77,910,742 151,309,661 155,848,951 160,524,420 165,340,152 170,300,357 175,409,368 180,671,649 186,091,798 191,674,552 197,424,789 203,347,532 209,447,958 215,731,397 222,203,339 228,869,439 235,735,522 242,807,588 250,091,816 257,594,570 265,322,407 273,282,080 281,480,542 136,161,369 140,246,210 144,453,596 Market Rents at 88% of Occupied Units 4,636,158,251 64,625,745 66,564,517 68,561,453 133,152,502 137,147,077 141,261,489 145,499,334 149,864,314 154,360,244 158,991,051 163,760,782 168,673,606 173,733,814 178,945,829 184,314,203 189,843,629 195,538,938 201,405,107 207,447,260 213,670,678 220,080,798 226,683,222 233,483,718 240,488,230 247,702,877 119,822,004 123,416,665 127,119,164 60% AMI Rents at 3% of Occupied Units 103,516,318 1,442,966 1,486,255 1,530,843 2,973,034 3,062,225 3,154,092 3,248,715 3,346,176 3,446,561 3,549,958 3,656,457 3,766,151 3,879,135 3,995,509 4,115,375 4,238,836 4,366,001 4,496,981 4,631,890 4,770,847 4,913,972 5,061,392 5,213,233 5,369,630 5,530,719 2,675,390 2,755,652 2,838,322 80% AMI Rents at 9% of Occupied Units 414,304,338 5,775,197 5,948,453 6,126,906 11,899,003 12,255,973 12,623,652 13,002,361 13,392,432 13,794,205 14,208,031 14,634,272 15,073,301 15,525,500 15,991,265 16,471,002 16,965,133 17,474,087 17,998,309 18,538,258 19,094,406 19,667,238 20,257,255 20,864,973 21,490,922 22,135,650 10,707,740 11,028,972 11,359,841 Total Affordable Rents 517,820,656 7,218,163 7,434,708 7,657,749 14,872,037 15,318,198 15,777,744 16,251,076 16,738,608 17,240,767 17,757,990 18,290,729 18,839,451 19,404,635 19,986,774 20,586,377 21,203,968 21,840,087 22,495,290 23,170,149 23,865,253 24,581,211 25,318,647 26,078,206 26,860,553 27,666,369 13,383,130 13,784,624 14,198,163 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Affordable Housing Rent Gap (Total Loss in Rents)114,382,742 1,594,439 1,642,272 1,691,540 3,285,123 3,383,676 3,485,187 3,589,742 3,697,434 3,808,357 3,922,608 4,040,286 4,161,495 4,286,340 4,414,930 4,547,378 4,683,799 4,824,313 4,969,043 5,118,114 5,271,657 5,429,807 5,592,701 5,760,482 5,933,297 6,111,296 2,956,234 3,044,921 3,136,269 Attachment E Sales Tax Analysis Salt Lake Central Station HTRZ Sales Tax Analysis Assumptions Retail Sales Tax Rates (Net Rate) Commercial Sales per SF1 251.01$ State 4.850% Buildout Commercial SF 565,358 Taxable Sales Base Year Online Sales per Resident $2,301 Taxable Sales Base Year Value (2023)19,742,787$ Additional Assumptions Overall City Sales Tax Revenue City Acreage Annual Inflation 1.0%11,996,574,173$ 70,920 ²2.17 HTRZ Proportion of 2023 Taxable Sales HTRZ Acreage Does not sum equally horizontally and vertically? Residential Vacancy Rate (Cushman & Wakefield 2023)2.50%0.16%116.71 New Sales to State 30.0% New Sales to County 50.0% New Sales to City 50.0% Time Indexed Sales ($)/SF Base Year YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Commercial (brick & mortar) Sales 251 254 256 259 261 264 266 269 272 275 277 280 283 286 289 291 294 297 300 303 306 309 312 316 319 322 325 328 332 Online Sales 2,301 2,324 2,347 2,370 2,394 2,418 2,442 2,467 2,491 2,516 2,541 2,567 2,593 2,618 2,645 2,671 2,698 2,725 2,752 2,780 2,807 2,835 2,864 2,892 2,921 2,951 2,980 3,010 3,040 Absorption Projections YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Phase 1 Residential Units - 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 3,073 Phase 2 Residential Units - 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 2,721 Total Residential Units - 3,073 3,073 3,073 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 5,793 Vacant Units - 77 77 77 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 HTRZ New Residents - 6,501 6,501 6,501 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 12,257 Phase 1 Commercial Square Feet - 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 403,775 Phase 2 Commercial Square Feet - 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 161,584 ¹(403,775) (403,775) (403,775) Commercial Square Feet - 403,775 403,775 403,775 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 565,358 161,584 161,584 161,584 YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Total Commercial Gross Taxable Sales - 102,364,963 103,388,612 104,422,499 147,672,693 149,149,420 150,640,915 152,147,324 153,668,797 155,205,485 156,757,540 158,325,115 159,908,366 161,507,450 163,122,524 164,753,750 166,401,287 168,065,300 169,745,953 171,443,413 173,157,847 174,889,425 176,638,319 178,404,703 180,188,750 181,990,637 52,534,440 53,059,784 53,590,382 4,083,145,693 Online Gross Taxable Sales - 15,106,322 15,257,385 15,409,959 29,346,407 29,639,872 29,936,270 30,235,633 30,537,989 30,843,369 31,151,803 31,463,321 31,777,954 32,095,734 32,416,691 32,740,858 33,068,266 33,398,949 33,732,939 34,070,268 34,410,971 34,755,080 35,102,631 35,453,658 35,808,194 36,166,276 36,527,939 36,893,218 37,262,150 874,610,106 Less Sales Tax Base Year (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) (19,742,787) Total Gross Taxable Sales - 97,728,497 98,903,210 100,089,670 157,276,314 159,046,505 160,834,398 162,640,170 164,463,999 166,306,067 168,166,556 170,045,649 171,943,533 173,860,397 175,796,428 177,751,821 179,726,767 181,721,462 183,736,105 185,770,894 187,826,030 189,901,719 191,998,164 194,115,573 196,254,157 198,414,126 69,319,592 70,210,216 71,109,746 4,938,013,012 Sales Tax Summary YR 1 YR 2 YR 3 YR 4 YR 5 YR 6 YR 7 YR 8 YR 9 YR 10 YR 11 YR 12 YR 13 YR 14 YR 15 YR 16 YR 17 YR 18 YR 19 YR 20 YR 21 YR 22 YR 23 YR 24 YR 25 YR 26 YR 27 YR 28 Total Sales & Use Tax Generation - 4,739,832 4,796,806 4,854,349 7,627,901 7,713,755 7,800,468 7,888,048 7,976,504 8,065,844 8,156,078 8,247,214 8,339,261 8,432,229 8,526,127 8,620,963 8,716,748 8,813,491 8,911,201 9,009,888 9,109,562 9,210,233 9,311,911 9,414,605 9,518,327 9,623,085 3,362,000 3,405,195 3,448,823 213,640,452 Percentage to TTIF 15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15%15% Total Sales Tax to TTIF - 710,975 719,521 728,152 1,144,185 1,157,063 1,170,070 1,183,207 1,196,476 1,209,877 1,223,412 1,237,082 1,250,889 1,264,834 1,278,919 1,293,144 1,307,512 1,322,024 1,336,680 1,351,483 1,366,434 1,381,535 1,396,787 1,412,191 1,427,749 1,443,463 504,300 510,779 517,323 32,046,068 Source: Utah Calendar Year Gross Taxable Sales and Purchases - 2023 Prepared by the Economics and Statistical Unit of the Utah State Tax Commission Note 1: This is the annual commercial gross taxable sales compared to the estimated commercial square footage for Salt Lake City. 2023 taxable sales data was obtained from the State Tax Commission website. Note 2: Census, 2022 ACS 1 YR Estimate, S1101 Households & Families Kate Werrett Kate.Werrett@slc.gov Marcus Lee Marcus.Lee@slc.gov Ashley Ogden Ashley.Ogden@slc.gov Staff Contacts: ATTACHMENT B: GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ APPROVAL LETTER May 7, 2025 Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency 451 S State St, Room 118 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Dear Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency, On behalf of the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity, I am pleased to inform you that on May 1, 2025 the Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone (HTRZ) Committee convened and approved your application for the creation of a Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone. This approval is for the project located within ½ mile of the Salt Lake Central Station, or Intermodal Hub, as presented to the committee. The approved HTRZ will be in effect for a duration of 25 consecutive years per phase over a 45-year period and a total of two phases. The project is authorized for a maximum capture of 80% of property tax increment and 15% sales and use tax increment, with the funding amount capped at $370 million. The tax increment funds are limited to the following uses: parking, affordable housing, enhanced residential costs and infrastructure improvements (i.e., streetscape and utility improvements). This approval also acknowledges the requirement that 12% of the housing developed will be affordable, with 9% of affordable housing of less than or equal to 80% of AMI and 3% of affordable housing of less than or equal to 60% of AMI. Additionally, as outlined in the motion, for property tax increment: Phase 1 will have a 2025 base year value and a 2026 trigger year and Phase 2 will have a 2028 base year value and a 2029 trigger year; and sales and use tax increment will have one phase with a 2027 base year value and a 2028 trigger year. We look forward to the successful implementation of this project and its positive impact on the community through improved housing and transit options. If you have any questions or need further assistance in fulfilling the conditions of approval, please feel free to reach out. Congratulations on this significant milestone, and thank you for your continued efforts to enhance the economic and community development of Salt Lake City and Utah. Sincerely, Kamron Dalton Managing Director of Operations This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/22/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/06/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Barlow, Aaron E-mail aaron.barlow@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/01/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/06/2025 Subject: Text Amendment - RMF-35 & RMF-45 Multi Family Zoning District Update Additional Staff Contact: Krissy Gilmore - kristina.gilmore@slc.govGrant Amann - grant.amaan@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Aaron Barlow - aaron.barlow@slc.govKrissy Gilmore - kristina.gilmore@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council follow the Planning Commission’s recommendation and approve the requested zoning text and map amendments. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Please review Attached memo. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City is proposing amendments to the zoning ordinance and map intended to update the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multifamily Residential and RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multifamily Residential) zoning districts. These proposed changes aim to remove barriers to new housing development and facilitate compatible infill within the City’s moderate-density neighborhoods. These proposed updates introduce design standards for new development, reduce minimum lot size requirements, eliminate lot width minimums, permit multiple buildings per lot, and offer a density bonus for preserving existing housing units. In 2023, the City Council adopted Housing SLC, a five-year comprehensive housing plan for the City. That plan calls for changes to zoning regulations that can support an established goal of entitling 10,000 new units throughout the City. Later, in 2023, the City Council also adopted Thriving in Place, Salt Lake City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy, which found that “Salt Lake City has a shortage of housing at every income level, but an especially significant shortage of housing affordable to lower-income households” (p. 15). Among other things, Thriving in Place calls for City staff to “create more diverse housing choices in all areas so that people can find housing that meets their needs in locations that work for them” (p. 48). This proposal aims to update the RMF- 35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) and the RMF-45 (Moderate/High-Density Multi-Family) zoning districts to align with key City plans and policies, including Plan Salt Lake (2015), Thriving in Place (2023), and Housing SLC (2023). WHY UPDATE THESE REGULATIONS? Initially adopted in 1995, the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts were intended to support a variety of medium- to high-density housing types. Development in these districts was meant to serve as a transition from low-density neighborhoods to higher-intensity areas and allow multi- family development to be integrated into established neighborhoods. However, since their creation, both districts have driven two predominant housing outcomes: single-family homes and large-scale apartment building developments. In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of this gap in our housing, referred to as “the missing middle,” and a desire to create more diverse housing choices. Existing District Complications 1. Minimum Lot Size Requirements Are Too Restrictive: 47% of the lots are smaller than 5,000 square feet and do not meet the minimum lot area for new development. Due to their size, these lots would only be eligible for single-family development. This means the two districts cannot accommodate moderate-density development intended for each zoning district. Additionally, what moderate density already exists is likely nonconforming (or “grandfathered”). 2. Minimum Lot Width Requirements Are Too High: To construct any new building, the lot must be at least 50’ wide. 66% of the lots within the two districts do not meet this minimum width. This means that only 1/3 of properties are eligible for redevelopment. All other lots are too narrow. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 2 3. Parking Requirements Are Too High: Approximately 96% of RMF-35 and RMF-45 properties are within ¼ miles of a public transit stop. However, both districts have the same parking requirements as single-family zones. Requiring too much parking can significantly impact the affordability, density, and feasibility of development proposals. As a result, over the past 30 years, only 4% of lots within these districts have seen any development, with just eight projects resulting in moderate- density housing. Most completed projects were low- density, like single-family houses. Due to challenges in meeting existing zoning standards, many of these projects also required special approvals. As they are currently written, both districts have encouraged the removal of older, more affordable units (known as “naturally occurring affordable housing”) for new development that is incompatible with its surroundings. For more information on background and research contributing to the proposal, refer to Planning staff’s study of the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. WHY DOES THIS MATTER? Housing Pressure Utah is on track to be short more than 150,000 housing units by 2030 (Kem Gardner Policy Institute). In Salt Lake City, housing costs have risen far faster than wages. Since 2005, wages have grown by 19%, but rents have climbed 38% and home prices have risen 83%. As a result, over half of renter households in the city are now considered cost-burdened. Despite steady construction—about 1,700 new units per year since 2017—production has not kept pace with demand. The gap continues to widen. The illustration above shows the range of “Missing Middle” housing types. Image © Opticos Design. Inc. For more info visit: https://missingmiddlehousing.com "Moderate-scale" or "missing middle" housing refers to housing types that fall between single-family homes and high-rise apartment buildings. These homes are appropriately scaled, thoughtfully designed, and located to support walkable neighborhoods. Examples include cottage courts, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and small to medium multi-unit apartments. They are intended to be compatible in scale with single-family neighborhoods while providing a gradual transition to higher-density areas. WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "MODERATE-SCALE" AND “MISSING MIDDLE” HOUSING? PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 3 Zoning’s Role Zoning is one of the many factors that influence housing costs. In this case, rules within the RMF- 35 and RMF-45 districts have sharply limited what can be built. Restrictions on lot size, setbacks, and other standards make it challenging to add units, even when the land is otherwise suitable for infill development. This stalls the gradual aging and turnover of housing stock that typically leads to more affordable homes over time—a process often referred to as “filtering.” Without new construction, even older housing becomes more expensive. Impacts on Property Owners: Allowing more housing options, such as accessory units or small-scale infill, can offer practical benefits to homeowners, making it easier to age in place, generate supplemental income, or support extended families under one roof. Unfortunately, numerous requirements in the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zones hinder this flexibility. These proposed changes can help create more inclusive, financially sustainable communities while addressing the City’s growing housing needs. Equity Issues: Like much of the United States, zoning regulations have influenced where people can live in Salt Lake City. Historically, land use policies have excluded lower-income households from many neighborhoods, concentrating new housing near freeways or arterial roads, areas that typically have worse air quality, more noise, and weaker health outcomes. Meanwhile, large parts of the city are zoned only for single-family homes, which are not subject to federal accessibility requirements and are largely out of reach for people with disabilities or lower incomes. Revising RMF zoning can help distribute housing opportunities more evenly and expand access to healthier, better-served areas. Addressing these systemic zoning issues is essential to creating a more inclusive and equitable City. Water Considerations Building more housing closer together, with smaller lots, reduced setbacks, or infill, can reduce per capita water use. Research (cited in staff’s report for the Planning Commission's meeting on March 12, 2025) shows that compact development, especially moderate-density development, uses existing infrastructure more efficiently than single-family development and supports long-term water savings. These principles have been incorporated into the zoning proposal currently under consideration. The illustration above shows how dwelling units make their way down the housing ladder, providing housing opportunities for lower incomes as they age. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. For more info visit: cmhc-schl.gc.ca/ PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 4 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The following is a summary of the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. Throughout the last part of 2024, the Planning Staff developed new regulations based on their initial research and feedback from other departments. The initial proposal was developed based on key proposal objectives (listed to the right), intended to align it with adopted plans and policies. Feedback from residents, community councils, businesses, developers, and commissioners (from both the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission) shaped updates developed by staff. The proposal underwent several iterations before the Planning Commission ultimately recommended approval to the City Council at its meeting on May 14, 2025. New “Form-Based” Approach This proposal takes a form-based approach to regulating new development. Form-based regulations are development standards that vary based on the type of proposed building. Currently, all residential building types (i.e., multi-family apartments, attached townhouses, individual detached houses, or duplexes) are subject to the same standards. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks the distinct impacts different building forms have on adjacent properties, the street, and the overall neighborhood. Instead, under the proposed regulations, each building form would be assessed individually with customized standards for setbacks, building heights, and design. Finally, in addition to single-family homes, duplexes, multi-family buildings, and street-facing townhouses, the proposal adds sideways-oriented rowhouses and cottage courts as permitted building types. Adjustments to Lot Requirements These updates include several changes to lot and building configuration standards, specifically adjustments to the lot width, lot area, and public street frontage requirements for the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. •Align the district’s purpose with adopted plans and policies. •Clarify and simplify regulations. •Encourage moderate density development and infill development. •Preserve existing buildings and neighborhood character. Key Proposal Objectives The illustration above shows residential building forms that would be permitted within the proposed RMF-45 zoning district. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 5 Lot Width The current RMF-35 & RMF-45 districts specify minimum lot widths by use. Rather than requiring minimums, these updates would require a maximum lot width of 110 feet, or approximately ¼ of a city block. Lot Area Currently, housing density in the RMF-35 and RMF- 45 districts is determined by a sliding scale; the larger the lot, the greater the density allowed. As shown in the table, this proposal standardizes and reduces minimum lot area requirements. Building Form Current Minimum Lot Area Proposed Minimum Lot Area Single-Family: Two-Family:1,500 sq ft (for 1 or 2 units) Cottage Development 500 sq ft per unit Row House 3,000 sq ft per unit 750 sq ft per unit Minimum 3 units Multi-Family 3 units: RMF-35: +2,000 sq ft per unit over 3 RMF-45: 750 sq ft per unit Minimum 3 units 5,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft Public Street Frontage The RMF-35 & RMF-45 districts currently require all buildings and lots to have frontage along a public street. Exceptions can only be approved by the Planning Commission. The proposed updates include a general provision that permits lots and buildings without public street frontage, provided certain conditions are met. Incentives for Retention of Existing Structures Increasing development potential carries the potential risk of existing housing being demolished and redeveloped. To mitigate displacement pressure, this proposal includes incentives for retaining existing structures, similar to those in the RMF-30 zoning district. Maintaining one or two dwelling units awards two bonus units beyond the minimum lot area (or density) requirement. Retaining PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 6 three or more dwelling units on a lot allows four additional units. Unlike the Zoning Incentives for building preservation (that would still be permitted in this proposal), this benefit would not require principal buildings to be older than 50 years. Design Standards The current RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts lack standards for the exterior design of new buildings, often resulting in development that feels disconnected from the pedestrian experience and out of step with the neighborhood character. These proposed updates introduce comprehensive design standards intended to ensure that all new development makes a positive contribution to the community. Key features included: • Durable Building Materials: At least 50% of the street-facing facade must use high-quality, durable, natural materials like stone, brick, wood siding, shingles, glass, etc. • Glass: 15% to 20% of all street-facing floors above the ground floor must be glass. The building form determines the exact amount. • Ground Floor Transparency: 15% to 20% of all street-facing ground floors must be glass. The building form determines the exact amount. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 7 • Entry Features: Each ground-floor building entrance facing the street must have an entry feature. Examples include a porch and fence, a terrace and light well, a portico, an awning, a forecourt, or a stoop. • Building Fenestration: No building wall that faces onto a street shall exceed more than 15 feet in length without being interrupted by windows, doors, or a change of building wall plane that results in an offset of at least 12 inches. Landscaping and Open Space Beyond basic yard setback requirements, open space is not currently required in the RMF-35 or RMF-45 zoning districts. Due to varying impacts and resident needs, open space and landscaping requirements for new development would differ based on building form under this proposal. Requirements for personal and shared open space are also differentiated with these updates. A complete summary of the proposed landscaping and open space requirements can be found in staff’s memo for the Planning Commission’s February 12, 2025, briefing. Parking The current RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts both fall under the ‘General’ parking context, where parking requirements can vary (based on unit type or number of bedrooms) from one to two spaces per dwelling unit. This context is particularly suitable for lower-density neighborhoods with limited transit access, which tend to be highly car-oriented, such as single-family neighborhoods and industrial areas. However, Staff’s analysis of the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts found that 96% of their lots were within a quarter mile of a transit stop, and more than 20% are within a quarter mile of a fixed rail station. To better align the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts with their transportation reality, these updates place them under the ‘Neighborhood Center’ context, where new dwelling units are required to have only one parking space (regardless of building type or number of units). This context is appropriate for neighborhoods with more pedestrian-scale development and amenities, while acknowledging that most residents will be car owners. MARCH 2025 UPDATES Cottage Development Requirements A consistent theme from Staff’s discussions with community members was an interest in the cottage development building form. Initially, staff had proposed a larger minimum lot area for cottage developments compared to other building forms (1,000 square feet per unit versus 750 square feet per unit). After some consideration, staff determined that, due to the smaller scale of their buildings, cottage developments could accommodate reduced minimum lot area and open space requirements, and made the following changes: • Minimum lot area: Reduced from 1,000 square feet to 500 sq. ft. per cottage unit. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 8 • Minimum open space area: Reduced personal open space area from 200 sq. ft. to 150 sq. ft. per unit and reduced common open space from 150 sq. ft. to 100 sq. ft. per unit. Zoning Incentives A second consistent theme from both the community and commissioners was a concern about the potential scale of new development. In particular, there was concern about the additional height that could be allowed through zoning incentives. Planning staff’s initial proposal would have allowed up to five stories (up to 55 feet in height) for new multi-family building projects that qualified for either Affordable Housing or Building Preservation incentives. Acknowledging these concerns, the additional height for incentives was removed from the proposal in March 2025. While projects that qualify for incentives would need to meet the height requirements for the base zoning district with this change, they could still receive an exemption from many other zoning regulations, including minimum lot area (density). Open Space Exception Finally, another consistent yet surprising theme was an interest in reducing the minimum open space area requirement for properties located near public parks or open spaces. Open space is an important part of any new development, but Planning staff concurs that public open space can fill that need when it is nearby and accessible to a property. The updated proposal eliminated the open space requirements for projects within 800 feet (via the closest reasonable walking path) of a public park or open space. MAY 2025 UPDATES A complete summary of the final proposal is included in Staff’s memo for the Planning Commission’s continued May 14, 2025, public hearing. Maintain both the RMF-35 and RMF-45 Zoning Districts The original Multi-family Merger proposal combined the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts into a single RMF-45 zoning district. In response to feedback from the Planning Commission and the public, staff revised the proposal to maintain two separate districts. Except for maximum height for certain building forms, the regulations for both districts are essentially the same. Urban Houses, Two-Family Dwellings, and Rowhouses all have a maximum height of 35 feet in both proposed districts. The maximum height for Cottage Developments is also the same in both districts, capped at 23 feet. On the other hand, multi-family and non-residential building forms do not have the same maximum height in both districts. They are permitted to be as tall as 45 feet in the RMF-45 district and limited to 35 feet in the RMF-35 district. Identify Properties that Need a Change in Zoning As directed by the Planning Commission, Planning staff reviewed properties on a block-by-block basis to identify where a different zoning district could be a better fit. They focused on properties in the RMF-35 zoning district with a higher land use designation in an associated adopted neighborhood plan. Naming conventions for Future Land Use Maps can vary between plans; however, for the most part, staff identified properties with a designation of Medium/High Mixed Use or higher. Ultimately, staff identified 23 properties with land use designations that recommended increased zoning intensity. Maps identifying each property are located in Exhibit 4. Other Changes to the Proposal Splitting the proposal back into two districts required Planning staff to make additional adjustments. Since the original proposal only included the RMF-45 zoning district, references to the RMF-35 district were removed. Those have been reincorporated. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 9 Planning staff also clarified the unit bonuses. The revised proposal clarifies that units used to qualify for the bonus do not all need to be located within the same building. Multiple units within multiple structures (i.e., three separate cottages in an existing cottage development) may be preserved to qualify for the unit density bonus. Finally, based on direction from Legal staff, projects that qualify for unit bonuses must have a restrictive covenant recorded on the affected property by the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. The proposal also includes the necessary terms for those restrictive covenants. PUBLIC PROCESS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS The Planning Division has prioritized equitable and accessible public participation throughout its efforts. To facilitate this, an interactive website (StoryMap) was created as a central hub to access information on the proposal. All public notice requirements in Utah Code and City Code were adhered to, with every affected property owner receiving a specific notice with the required information. All occupants were also notified, as were all occupants and owners within 300 feet of a property that was subject to the changes. The following is a schedule of City-wide early engagement efforts by Planning staff: • December 11, 2024 – The project Storymap was launched • December 11, 2024 – Recognized Organizations were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations • December 12, 2024 – Focus group with small-scale and affordable housing developers • December 23, 2024 – Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the affected properties were provided early notification of the proposal and the March 12, 2025, Planning Commission hearing date. • January 8, 2025 – Public notice signs advertising the proposal and the March 12, 2025, public hearing were posted at all Salt Lake City Public Library branches • January 22, 2025 – General Community Open House at City Hall Additionally, to more efficiently and effectively engage with residents and property owners, Planning staff worked with Community Councils to connect with their established neighborhood networks. The following is a list of Community Council meetings and events where staff gave a presentation, held an open house, or provided both. • January 6, 2025 – East Central Community Council Executive Board Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Downtown Alliance Development Committee Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Central City Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Sugar House Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 15, 2025 – Capitol Hill Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 16, 2025 – Liberty Wells Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 23, 2025 – East Liberty Park Community Organization Presentation • February 13, 2025 – East Central Community Council Community Resource Fair Open House and Presentation • March 5, 2025 – Greater Avenues Community Council Presentation PUBLIC FEEDBACK Through the numerous public engagement events and the initial briefings on the proposal to the Historic Landmark Commission (at the meeting on February 6, 2025) and the Planning PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 10 Commission (at their meeting on February 12, 2025), planning staff identified several key themes. They are discussed below 1. Demolition of Existing Housing A common concern raised by the public was that increasing housing allowances could lead to the demolition of existing homes, especially those that may be older or more affordable, to make room for larger, more expensive developments. This is a valid issue and has shaped how staff approached the proposal. While the current RMF zoning districts are intended to permit multifamily housing, in practice, very few lots meet the requirements for its construction. In RMF- 35 and RMF-45 zones, most lots are too small to allow more than a duplex or triplex. Even in RMF-45, only about 53 properties can currently achieve a density of 30 units per acre, which is well below the intended goal of around 43 units per acre set by neighborhood plans. While these changes would allow more units on some lots, many existing multifamily buildings already have more units than would be permitted under the new rules. This means there is less incentive to demolish these buildings, even if the land becomes more valuable. The following were included in the proposal in an attempt to discourage demolition further and prevent displacement: • A 110-foot maximum lot width would limit land assembly for large-scale developments. • Unit bonuses are offered for projects that add housing without demolishing existing structures. • The Building Preservation Incentives, adopted earlier, are also included. These offer benefits such as reduced parking requirements and waived density caps when older buildings are preserved and renovated. • About 37% of all affected lots are in local historic districts, where demolition is more challenging and requires special approval. State and federal historic tax credits also encourage rehabilitation over replacement. Still, staff recognizes that some demolition will happen, as that decision ultimately lies with property owners. The proposal aims to mitigate that impact while still accommodating additional housing. 2. Affordability and Attainability of New Housing Another concern linked to demolition is that the housing replacing older buildings may be unaffordable to current residents. This is a common concern with zoning changes that allow for more development, especially when new buildings tend to be more expensive to rent or buy. It is important to note that housing prices are already rising due to demand outpacing supply. Without any change, this trend is expected to continue. The proposed updates to the RMF districts aim to The chart above illustrates how much the proposed minimum lot area changes would impact the affected properties' development potential. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 11 accommodate more housing, particularly smaller units, which are generally more affordable to construct and own. While zoning changes alone cannot guarantee deeply affordable housing, increasing the overall number of units available helps reduce pressure on the market. With more units to choose from, competition for any single unit decreases. This helps stabilize prices over time and gives households at more income levels a better chance to find housing that fits their needs. The proposal helps address affordability in three main ways: • Makes it easier to build more housing across a range of lot sizes. • Encourages the construction of smaller units, which typically cost less. • Preserves existing buildings where possible, reducing displacement of current residents. 3. Scale of New Development Some residents, especially in areas zoned RMF-35, raised concerns about the size of new buildings that could result from these changes. In response, several guardrails are built into the proposal to manage scale and preserve the feel of existing neighborhoods. Key limits include: • 110-foot maximum lot width to prevent very large developments. • Design standards to guide the look and form of new buildings. • A cap of 20 units per building, which is roughly the size of a traditional four-story walk-up. • Further, in response to scale concerns, the original proposal to allow 55-foot-tall buildings with affordable housing or preservation incentives was removed from the proposal. To reach the 20-unit threshold, a developer would need a lot of space, at least 15,000 square feet. Only about 13.7% of affected properties (299 lots) are large enough to meet that size requirement, and that’s before accounting for existing buildings or site constraints. This balanced approach allows for some growth while still keeping larger-scale buildings limited to specific sites that can support them. COMMISSION BRIEFINGS AND HEARINGS February 2025 Briefings Planning Staff held briefings on the initial proposal with the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) on February 6, 2025, and with the Planning Commission (PC) on February 12, 2025. Both commissions provided general feedback, with concerns that generally aligned with those of the community. The Historic Landmark Commission had particular concerns about new development within Local Historic Districts. Planning staff assured them that new development and any demolitions of contributing structures would require HLC review. The illustration above show how a limited the supply of housing for all incomes in a community makes it unattainable for lower-income residents. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 12 March 2025 Planning Commission Hearing The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on March 12, 2025. The Commission’s response to staff’s updated proposal was mixed. Specifically, there were scale concerns about the proposed 45-foot height in neighborhoods zoned RMF-35, especially within neighborhoods with relatively larger lots that could see an increase in development pressure. Concerns were also raised regarding individual properties in either district located within neighborhoods that consist primarily of single-family zoning. Other Commission members were more supportive and suggested only minor tweaks, such as setback requirements for larger building forms, including multifamily and non-residential buildings. Some commissioners expressed full support for the original proposal. In their motion, the Commission directed staff to maintain the two districts (RMF-35 and RMF- 45) and identify properties that may be appropriate for an increase (from RMF-35 to RMF-45) or decrease (from RMF-35 to RMF-30) in zoning intensity. Planning Staff has incorporated the Commission’s direction as much as possible. Specific changes are outlined in the “Updates to the Proposal” section of this report. May 2025 Planning Commission Hearing Between the March 12, 2025, Public Hearing and the continued public hearing on May 14, 2025, Planning staff updated the proposal to reflect the Planning Commission’s direction. In particular, the revised proposal maintained the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts and their associated maximum height. Additionally, staff identified RMF-35 properties that are suitable for rezoning to RMF-45. Following staff’s presentation and the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the proposal. Public Hearing Comments Public comments during the two public hearings were mixed, with opinions roughly evenly divided between support and opposition to the proposal (minutes for the March 12, 2025, public hearing can be found here, and minutes for the May 14, 2025, public hearing can be found here). Those who opposed the proposal raised concerns about the potential changes to affected neighborhoods. Specific issues mentioned by the public included parking, loss of sunlight and solar access, alterations in neighborhood character, possible decreases in property values, and the need for appropriate setbacks between taller and shorter buildings. Supporters of the proposal highlighted several reasons the changes were necessary. They echoed Planning staff’s concerns about the ineffectiveness of current regulations. Many expressed worries about school closures, low-quality housing, and a competitive rental market due to documented shortages in housing, all of which have been exacerbated by existing policies and regulations. They also pointed out the proximity of affected neighborhoods to transit, jobs, and downtown, emphasizing the need to expand housing opportunities in these areas. Advocates countered the argument that new development would displace naturally occurring affordable housing. One commenter reiterated staff’s earlier point that new housing development helps to alleviate demand for existing units, thereby supporting affordability. Additional public comments received after the public hearings are located in Exhibit 3. Planning Commission Records 1. February 6, 2025 – Historic Landmark Commission Briefing a. Agenda b. Minutes PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 13 c. Staff Memo d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 2. February 12, 2025 – Planning Commission Briefing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Memo d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 3. March 12, 2025 – First Planning Commission Public Hearing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Report d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 4. May 14, 2025 – Second Planning Commission Public Hearing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Report d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording EXHIBITS: 1. Zoning Map Amendment Ordinance 2. Zoning Text Amendment Ordinances 3. Public Comments Received After Staff Reports Were Published 4. Maps identifying properties to be rezoned from RMF-35 to RMF-45 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels of property from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District in connection with revised regulations for such districts) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels Citywide as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone select properties from the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district to the RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-01388. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 14, 2025, on a petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code related to the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) and RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) zoning districts and establish new regulations pertaining to those districts; and WHEREAS, in order to conform with the future land use maps of the neighborhood plans implicated by these zoning districts, the parcels identified in this ordinance needed to be rezoned; WHEREAS, at its May 14, 2025, meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a position recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the property depicted in Exhibit A and listed by Tax ID number 2 in Exhibit B shall be rezoned from the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district to the RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district. In the event that a conflict arises between Exhibit A and Exhibit B, Exhibit A shall control. It is not the intent of this Section 1 to modify existing district boundaries (i.e. the physical location between or on parcels where a district boundary lies), only to change the assigned zoning district of the properties subject to this Section 1. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. Ordinance Rezoning Properties for RMF35/45 Amendments_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 22, 2025 3 Exhibit “A” Zoning Map Amendment - Depiction NORTH TEMPLE ST 1300 S 13 0 0 E MA I N S T RE D W O O D R D ST A T E S T HI G H L A N D DR 2700 S 90 0 W 600 N 400 S INDIANA AVE 800 S 30 0 W 1700 S 2100 S 40 0 W 90 0 E 11 0 0 E VIC T O R Y RD RE D W O O D R D 21 0 0 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 500 S FOO T H ILL DR 1000 N 100 S FO O T H I L L D R 90 0 W 600 S 70 0 E BEC K S T 200 S 700 N SUNNYSIDE AVE WE S T T E M P L E S T 500 S PAR L E Y S W A Y 500 S MAR IOCA P E C C H I DR 22 0 0 W 2100 N CALIFORNIA AVE 3300 S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Map Number RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 3000 6000 Feet Zoning Map Amendment - Map Index 7/22/2025 280 N JO R D A N RIV E R PK Y NA V A J O S T PU E B L O S T 13 3 0 W 300 S INDIANSUMM E R DR 200 S 11 0 0 W 200 N NORTH TEMPLE ST 12 8 0 W DE M P S EY LN 180 N MO N T G O M E R Y S T 240 N EM E R Y S T CO N C O R D S T CH E Y E N N E S T FA L L S T 400 S EUCLID AVE 12 0 0 W PIERPONT AVE 13 0 0 W 200 S MOTOR AVE BO T H W E L L S T GL E N D A L E S T 13 0 0 W IOLA AVE 14 0 0 W I-80 EB I-15 NB RAMP 13 2 0 W 13 4 0 W 15 0 0 W FO S S S T I-80 WB FWY I-80 W BREDWOODOFF RAMP CO R N E L L S T 14 6 0 W I-80 EB REDWOOD ON RAMP I-80 EB FW Y RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 1 7/22/2025 ST A T E S T 300 S MA I N S T 200 N EASTCA P I T OL ST CA N Y O N R D 4TH AVE ORPHEUM AVE MA I N S T 400 S 200 S EXCHANGE PL 100 S SOUTH TEMPLE ST NORTH TEMPLE ST 3RD AVE HILLSIDE AVE 2ND AVE 1ST AVE CA N Y O N ( E ) R D 20 0 E ALM O ND ST 30 0 W WE S T T E M P L E S T 20 0 W RE G E N T S T CA N Y O N S I D E L N 100 S PO P L A R C T DE L M A R C T WA Y N E C T MA R G U E R I T E C T SH E L M E R D I N E C T QU I N C E S T QU A R TE R RO W VINEST FL O R A L S T PL U M A L Y GALLIVAN AVE PIERPONT AVE SOCIAL HALL AVE MARKET ST ED I S O N S T RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 2 7/22/2025 SOUTH TEMPLE ST 100 S 200 S 300 S 400 S ARNOLD PL 80 0 E 90 0 E ST R O N G S C T MARKEA AVE 4TH AVE 3RD AVE 2ND AVE 1ST AVE BUENO AVE RE E V E S T E R ISOM PL H S T 60 0 E 50 0 E DE N V E R S T 40 0 E CLAWSON PL LINDEN AVE BA N K S C T IV A N C T HE A T H E R S T C S T WE S T C T D S T E S T 70 0 E F S T G S T I S T J S T K S T L S T M S T ALAMEDA AVE LA K E R C T HA W K E S C T SLADE PL VI N C E N T C T CHAPMAN PL HANOVER PL DO O L E Y C T WI N D S O R S T BU R N S S T MENLO AVE RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 3 7/22/2025 500 S 600 S 700 S 800 S 900 S 90 0 W 40 0 W 50 0 W I-1 5 SB 90 0 SONRAM P I-1 5 NB 90 0 SOFF RAMP 60 0 W 80 0 W 700 S 600 S 500 S PIONEER CIR I- 1 5 S B F W Y I-1 5 S B C O L L E C T O R R A M P JE R E M Y S T I- 1 5 N B F W Y 600 FRTG 50 0 W 70 0 W 76 5 W MONTAGUE AVE MEAD AVE DALTON AVE 70 0 W PACIFIC AVE GENESEE AVE PO S T S T FAYETTE AVE 500 FRTG 46 5 W ARAPAHOE AVE FAYETTE AVE MONTAGUE AVE WO O D B I N E S T JE R E M Y S T I-1 5 N B I - 8 0 W B R A M P I-1 5 NB 40 0 SOF F RA MP I-1 5 S B 4 0 0 S O N R A M P I-80 WB 500SONRAMP I-8 0 EBI-15 SB R A M P I- 1 5 NB 60 0 SOFF RAM P I-8 0 EB 600 SOFF RAM P I-1 5 SB 50 0 S O N R A M P RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 4 7/22/2025 20 0 W 900 S BROOKLYN AVE 800 S 500 S 700 S 600 S 20 0 E ST A T E S T 30 0 W EARDLEY PL MA I N S T PL E A S A N T C T WE S T T E M P L E S T BAILEY PL MA J O R S T BELMONT AVE MEAD AVE LOWELL AVE UPTON PL GREGORY PL MONTROSE AVE WASATCH PL ST R I N G F E L L O W C T MA J O R S T MO R T E N S E N C T COLFAX AVEPORTOLA AVE HUBBARD AVE ORCHARD PL JE F F E R S O N S T WA S H I N G T O N S T HERBERT AVE WILLIAMS AVE RO B E R T A S T ED I S O N S T RI C H A R D S S T FAYETTE AVE I-15SB900SONRAM P WES T TE M P L EFR T G I-15 NB 900 S OFF RAMP RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 5 7/22/2025 MA I N S T WE S T T E M P L E S T 20 0 E 20 0 E 1700 S ANDREW AVE ST A T E S T 1300 S 1400 S BROWNING AVE KENSINGTON AVE 30 0 W 20 0 W HIGH AVE LUCY AVE PAXTON AVE ED I S O N S T MA J O R S T WA S H I N G T O N S T RO B E R T A S T HARRIS AVE WILSON AVE MA J O R S T FO U L G E R S T RO B E R T A S T JE F F E R S O N S T 1630 S GOLTZ AVE FREMONT AVE MERRIMAC AVE VAN BUREN AVE CLEVELAND AVE QUAYLE AVE COATSVILLE AVE WOOD AVE BRYAN AVE HARRISON AVE HARVARD AVE RI C H A R D S S T RI C H A R D S S T JE F F E R S O N S T EDITH AVE KELSEY AVE HAMPTON AVE YALE AVE HERBERT AVE PARAMOUNT AVE BOULEVARD GARDENS ST RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 6 7/22/2025 15 0 0 E PRINCETON AVE 14 0 0 E HARVARD AVE 11 0 0 E 13 0 0 E 10 0 0 E YALE AVE BRYAN AVE MILTON AVE 1700 S MC C L E L L A N D S T 14 0 0 E 1300 S WILSON AVE BLAINE AVE PRINCETON AVE 12 0 0 E UI N T A H C I R LA I R D C I R LAIRD AVE NO R M A N D I E C I R 10 0 0 E WILSON AVE EMERSON AVE HARVARD AVE DO U G L A S S T YALE AVE HARRISON AVE LOGAN AVE FI L M O R E S T ROOSEVELT AVE BLAINE AVE SHERMAN AVE BROWNING AVE KENSINGTON AVE LOGAN AVE WOOD AVE RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 7 7/22/2025 ELM AVE 2100 S HI G H L A N D D R 11 0 0 E HOLLYWOOD AVE RAMONA AVE DOWNINGTON AVE WILSON AVE 13 0 0 E PARKWAY AVE 12 0 0 E DO U G L A S S T EL I Z A B E T H S T 10 0 0 E 15 0 0 E MC C L E L L A N D ST 14 0 0 E I-80 EB FWY SUGARHOUSEPARK SOUTH RD GARFIELD AVE SUGARMONT DR WILMINGTON AVE I-80 WB FWY VI E W S T SU G A R H O U S E PAR K WESTRD EL I Z A B E T H S T SIMPS O NAVE DOWNINGTON AVE I-80 WB FWY WESTMINSTER AVE FI L M O R E S T 15 0 0 E DE A R B O R N S T CH A D W I C K S T BE V E R L Y S T WILSON AVE AL D E N S T WARNOCK AVE 13 0 0 F R T G E GARFIELD AVE RAMONA AVE HOLLYWOOD AVE REDONDO AVE SUGARHOUSE PARK NORTH RD 11 0 0 E ASHTON AVE I-80 WB 1 3 0 0 E OFF RAMP DO U G L A S S T WESTMINSTER AVE ALLEN PARK DR I-80 EB 1300 E O F F R A M P DRIGGS AVE STRINGHAM AVE SUGARHOUSE PARK MIDDLE RD I-80 EB 1300 E ON RAMP RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 8 7/22/2025 2700 S WHITLOCK AVE AN G E L ITA CT 11 0 0 E HIG H L A N D D R 3000 S JASPER CIR CLAYBOURNE AVE ZENITH CIR HU D S O N C I R FO R E S T D A L E C I R CAT O N WAY EL I Z A B ET H ST STRATFORD AVE BRICKYARDRD JU D I T H S T RI C H MOND ST DO U G L A S S T CRANDALL AVE 13 0 0 E ELGIN AVE AUSTIN AVE ZENITH AVE 13 3 5 E ELGINHE I G H T S L N 10 0 0 E CHARLTON AVE HUDSON AVE ATKIN AVE 13 0 0 F R T G E 14 0 0 E 15 0 0 E ATKIN AVE 12 0 0 E WARNOCK AVE BE V E R L Y S T AL D E N S T MALVERN AVE DE A R B O R N S T FI L M O R E S T CRYSTAL AVE CH A D W I C K S T GRAYSTONE WAY MC C L E L L A N D S T 11 7 0 E HUDSON AVE 15 0 0 E RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 10 7/22/2025 STRATFORD AVE 2700 S 20 0 0 E COVE Y V I E W C T CRANDALL CIR YU M A S T ATKIN AVE IM P E R I A L S T MARY DOTT WAY MABEY DR SO N N E T D R ID A C I R PR E ST O N ST STR A T F O R D DR 21 0 0 E CRYSTAL AVE CO N N O R S T HIGHLAND VIEW CIR 17 0 0 E HILLCREST AVE I-80EBFWY PR E S T O N S T 19 0 0 E GR A N D V I E W C I R WE L L I N G T O N S T ME L B O U R N E S T 18 0 0 E KE N W O O D S T PARLEYS TER WHITE AVE BOSHAM LN CLAYBOURNE AVE I-80 W B F W Y RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 11 7/22/2025 4 Exhibit “B” Zoning Map Amendment - Identification by Tax ID Number TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-001-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-002-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-003-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-004-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-005-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-006-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-007-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-008-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-009-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-010-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-011-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-012-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-013-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 207 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-014-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 208 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-015-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-016-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-017-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-018-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-019-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-020-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-021-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 307 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-022-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 308 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-023-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 401 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-024-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 402 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-025-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 403 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-026-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 404 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-027-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 405 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-028-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 406 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-029-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 407 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-030-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 408 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-031-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 501 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 1 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-032-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 502 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-033-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 503 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-034-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 504 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-035-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 505 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-036-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 506 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-037-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 507 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-038-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 508 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-039-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 601 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-040-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 602 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-041-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 603 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-042-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 604 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-043-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 605 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-044-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 701 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-045-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 702 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-046-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 703 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-047-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 704 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-049-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # PENH RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-050-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P6 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-052-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P10 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-053-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P53 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-054-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P12 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-055-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P13 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-056-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P15 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-057-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P17 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-058-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P22 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-059-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P24 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-060-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P25 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-061-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P35 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-062-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P40 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-063-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P47 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-064-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P49 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 2 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-066-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P18 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-067-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 705 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-068-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P9 RMF-35 RMF-45 15-02-306-001-0000 351-363 S CONCORD ST RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-001-0000 1677 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-002-0000 1671 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-003-0000 1659 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-015-0000 665-667 S 900 W RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-016-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-017-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-018-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-004-0000 126 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-005-0000 120 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-006-0000 134 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-13-229-005-0000 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-284-001-0000 602 E 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-428-001-0000 321 S 600 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-428-002-0000 323 S 600 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-001-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-002-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-003-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-004-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-005-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-006-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-007-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-008-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-009-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-010-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-011-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-012-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-013-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 3 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-156-015-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-016-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-017-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-018-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-019-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-020-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-021-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-022-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-023-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-024-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-025-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 13 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-026-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 14 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-027-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 15 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-028-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 16 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-029-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 17 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-030-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 18 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-031-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 19 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-032-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 20 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-033-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 21 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-034-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 22 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-035-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 23 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-036-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 24 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-037-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-038-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-039-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-040-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-041-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-042-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-043-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-044-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-045-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 4 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-156-046-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-047-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-048-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-050-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-051-0000 976 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-307-018-0000 992 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-001-0000 996 S 200 E # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-002-0000 996 S 200 E # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-003-0000 996 S 200 E # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-004-0000 996 S 200 E # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-005-0000 996 S 200 E # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-006-0000 996 S 200 E # 106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-007-0000 996 S 200 E # 107 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-008-0000 996 S 200 E # 108 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-009-0000 996 S 200 E # 109 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-010-0000 996 S 200 E # 110 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-011-0000 996 S 200 E # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-012-0000 996 S 200 E # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-013-0000 996 S 200 E # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-014-0000 996 S 200 E # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-015-0000 996 S 200 E # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-016-0000 996 S 200 E # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-017-0000 996 S 200 E # 207 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-018-0000 996 S 200 E # 208 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-019-0000 996 S 200 E # 209 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-020-0000 996 S 200 E # 210 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-021-0000 996 S 200 E # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-022-0000 996 S 200 E # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-023-0000 996 S 200 E # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-024-0000 996 S 200 E # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-025-0000 996 S 200 E # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 5 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-314-026-0000 996 S 200 E # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-027-0000 996 S 200 E # 307 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-028-0000 996 S 200 E # 308 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-029-0000 996 S 200 E # 309 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-030-0000 996 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-031-0000 996 S 200 E # 310 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-15-380-022-0000 2243 E 2100 S RMF-35 RMF-45 16-16-352-006-0000 1951 S 1300 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-17-204-032-0000 1418-1426 S 1100 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-17-481-008-0000 1945 S 1300 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-21-479-020-0000 2673 S PRESTON ST RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-002-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1001 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-003-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1002 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-004-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1003 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-005-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1004 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-006-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1005 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-007-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1006 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-008-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-009-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-010-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-011-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-012-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-013-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-014-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-015-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-016-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-017-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-018-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-019-0000 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-020-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-021-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1302 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 6 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-255-022-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-023-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-024-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1305 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-025-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-026-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1401 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-027-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1402 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-028-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1403 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-029-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1404 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-030-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1405 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-031-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1406 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-032-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1501 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-033-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1502 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-034-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1503 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-035-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1504 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-036-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1505 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-037-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1506 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-038-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1601 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-039-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1602 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-040-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1603 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-041-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1604 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-042-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1605 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-043-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1606 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-044-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1701 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-045-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1702 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-046-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1703 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-047-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1704 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-048-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1705 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-049-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1706 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-050-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1801 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-051-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1802 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-052-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1803 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 7 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-255-053-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1804 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-054-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1805 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-055-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1806 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-056-0000 1157 E BRICKYARD RD RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-002-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-003-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-004-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-005-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-006-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-007-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-008-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-009-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-010-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-011-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-012-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-013-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-014-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-015-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-016-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-017-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-018-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-019-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-020-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 403 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-021-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 401 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-022-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 402 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-023-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 404 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-024-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 405 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-025-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 406 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-026-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 501 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-027-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 502 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-028-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 503 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 8 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-258-029-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 504 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-030-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 505 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-031-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 506 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-032-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 601 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-033-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 602 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-034-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 603 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-035-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 604 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-036-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 605 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-037-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 606 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-038-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 701 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-039-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 702 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-040-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 703 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-041-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 704 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-042-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 705 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-043-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 706 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-044-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 801 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-045-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 802 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-046-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 803 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-047-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 804 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-048-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 805 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-049-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 806 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-050-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 901 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-051-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 902 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-052-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 903 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-053-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 904 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-054-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 905 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-055-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 906 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-278-021-0000 3025 S 1100 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-003-0000 1006 E WELBY AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-004-0000 3103 S 1000 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-005-0000 3111 S 1000 E RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 9 of 9 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A.24.130 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential 45 Districts Petition No.: PLNPC2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 to remove RMF-35 language • Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 to replace RMF-35 with new RMF-35 & RMF-45 Ordinance • Amends 21A.24.140 to remove RMF-45 language Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 as follows: 1 21A.24.130: RMF-35 and RMF-45 MODERATE DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2 DISTRICTS 3 A. Purpose Statement: The RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential Districts 4 are intended to provide an environment in the city suitable for a variety of residential building forms 5 that are moderate in scale, up to a height of 35 feet in the RMF-35 district and 45 feet in the RMF-45 6 district, with a density based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The districts serve 7 as a transition between low-density neighborhoods and areas with greater land-use intensity. The 8 primary intent of both districts is to enable infill development, encourage incremental construction of 9 affordable and attainable housing, and support the character of established residential neighborhoods. 10 The form-based standards for the districts are intended to promote a variety of housing options. These 11 districts are meant to facilitate an engaging pedestrian experience, support nearby commercial uses, 12 and encourage sustainable modes of transportation. 13 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use 14 tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. Any permitted or conditional use shall also be 15 limited by any specific provision in this chapter or as determined by the building type definitions 16 found in 21A.62.060. 17 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the 18 requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that 19 specifically apply to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 20 C. General Provisions: 21 1. Building Height: 22 a. Maximum: Building height maximums are based on building forms listed in Section 23 21A.24.130.I. 24 b. Measurement: Building height in this chapter shall be measured from finished grade. 25 2. Yard and Setback: 26 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/16/25_____________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 a. General Yard Applicability: When a development includes multiple lots, the minimum 27 required yards may apply to the perimeter of the development rather than to individual lots. 28 b. Front and Corner Side Yard Exceptions: 29 (1) Adjacent Building Exception: A required minimum front or corner side yard may be 30 reduced to equal an abutting lot's front or corner side yard if the yard area is located along 31 the same block face. 32 (2) Curb Distance Exception: No minimum setback is required for the front or corner side 33 yard if the respective lot line is more than 20 feet from the street curb face. 34 c. Side or Rear Yard Abutting an Alley: Half the width of an abutting alley may be counted 35 toward a required side or rear yard. 36 3. Lot Size Provisions: 37 a. Lot Width Maximum: The width of a new lot shall not exceed 110 feet. Where more than 38 one lot is created, the combined lot width of abutting lots within a new subdivision, including 39 area between lots, shall not exceed 110 feet. 40 b. Lot Area Requirement Exception: No minimum lot area is required for utility buildings and 41 structures or for allowed uses that do not involve the construction of a principal building, 42 such as parks and open space. 43 4. Open Space Area Requirements: Open space areas may include landscaped yards, patios, 44 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private 45 balconies, required parking lot landscaping, or required perimeter parking lot landscaping shall 46 not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. When required by the building 47 form standards in this chapter, the following open space standards shall apply: 48 a. Common Open Space Areas: A common open space area is an outdoor space shared by all 49 dwelling units within a development that meets the minimum size requirement specified in an 50 applicable building form table. For developments that involve subdividing a site into multiple 51 lots, common open space areas may use the entire development area, provided each dwelling 52 unit has legally established access to the common open space area. At least 50% of the 53 required common open space shall be contiguous and include the following: 54 (1) A minimum of 33% live vegetation; 55 (2) A minimum width of 6 feet; 56 (3) and at least two of the following: 57 (A) A bench for every 250 square feet of common open space area; 58 (B) An outdoor amenity intended to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities, 59 which may include playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sports courts, or similar 60 amenities intended to promote outdoor activity; or 61 (C) A shade structure or tree with a minimum spread of 20 feet at mature height for every 62 250 square feet of common open space area. If a tree is provided, the tree canopy at 63 maturity may count toward the required minimum area of vegetation. 64 b. Personal Open Space Areas: A personal open space area is a private area that is accessible 65 only to its respective dwelling unit. Each personal open space area shall be separated from 66 other areas by a fence, hedge, or other physical barrier to distinguish it as private. When 67 required, the minimum personal open space area shall apply to each dwelling unit in a 68 development. Each personal open space area shall: 69 (1) Contain at least one shade area. Shade may include a tree, pergola, gazebo, or other 70 similar structure designed to provide shade to the area. Shade structures may encroach 71 into a required yard provided they are located at least one foot from all lot lines; 72 3 (2) Have no more than 50% coverage of impervious surfaces; 73 (3) Not be located within a required front yard; and 74 (4) Have a minimum width of 6 feet. 75 c. Proximity to Public Parks: The open space required by a building form standard does not 76 apply when the subject property is within 800 feet of a public park or open space, as 77 measured along the closest reasonable walking path. 78 5. Public Street Frontage: 79 a. Buildings Without Frontage: A lot may contain principal buildings without public street 80 frontage provided that: 81 (1) At least one principal building on the lot has public street frontage and meets the 82 minimum front yard setback, 83 (2) Each building has legally established access to a public street, and 84 (3) Each ground-floor dwelling unit of the Row House, Urban House, Two-Family, and 85 Cottage Development forms shall include an entry feature allowed by 21A.37.050, 86 regardless of street frontage. 87 b. Lots without Frontage: For the purpose of this provision, individual dwellings may be on 88 their own lot, including within a condominium development. Lots without public street 89 frontage, used for individual dwelling units or buildings, are allowed subject to a preliminary 90 subdivision plat process and recording a final subdivision plat that: 91 (1) Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a 92 shared driveway and 93 (2) Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure 94 associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title and all other 95 requirements therein. 96 6. Midblock Walkways: When identified in the general plan, midblock walkways are subject 97 to the following requirements: 98 a. Width: The midblock walkway shall meet the minimum width requirements established 99 in the applicable plan. If no minimum width is provided, it shall be 6 feet. 100 b. Encroachments: The following building encroachments are permitted in an outdoor 101 midblock walkway: 102 (1) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; 103 (2) Building overhangs and associated cantilever: These coverings shall be located no 104 lower than 9 feet above the level of the sidewalk and may project up to 6 feet; 105 (3) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offer refuge from weather and/or 106 provide publicly accessible usable space, projecting up to 1 foot into the midblock 107 walkway. 108 D. Unit Density Bonus: Bonus dwelling units may be granted when an existing principal building is 109 retained as part of a development that adds at least one additional dwelling unit pursuant to the 110 following: 111 1. Two bonus dwelling units of any building type may be granted for retaining an existing structure 112 that contains one or two dwelling units, or retaining two dwelling units within separate buildings 113 on a site. 114 2. Four bonus dwelling units of any type may be granted for retaining an existing building 115 containing three or more dwelling units or retaining three or more dwelling units within multiple 116 buildings on a site. 117 3. A bonus dwelling unit may be added within or attached to an existing principal building or as a 118 separate building, provided that all other applicable zoning requirements are met. Bonus units are 119 not subject to minimum lot area requirements. 120 4 4. The addition of a bonus dwelling unit to an existing principal building does not change the 121 building type of the existing building. 122 5. Bonus dwelling units are exempt from minimum off-street parking requirements. 123 6. Bonus dwelling units are exempt from open space area requirements. 124 7. The exterior building walls and roofline of the existing principal building must be retained to 125 obtain a bonus dwelling unit. Additional stories are permitted and existing architectural elements 126 may be modified provided they meet applicable zoning or historic preservation standards. 127 8. A density bonus may only be requested with a building permit application for development that 128 meets the minimum lot area requirements. 129 9. Any density bonus granted shall be documented through a restrictive covenant, the form of which 130 shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded on the property 131 with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to final inspection of the bonus units. The restrictive 132 covenant shall run with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 133 a. Indicate that bonus dwelling units were established by retaining existing structures on a site. 134 b. Guarantee that the building(s) containing the unit(s) used to qualify for the bonus units shall 135 not be demolished unless the associated bonus units are also demolished; and 136 c. Establish that the terms of the restrictive covenant are enforceable by the city or, pursuant to 137 Utah Code Section 10-9a-802 (or its successor), any adversely affected party, and that in any 138 such enforcement action the court shall award the prevailing party its attorneys' fees. 139 E. Other Applicable Regulations: The following additional regulations apply to properties within 140 this district: 141 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 142 2. 21A.24.010 General Provisions for Residential Districts 143 3. 21A.36 General Provisions 144 4. 21A.37 Design Standards 145 5. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 146 6. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 147 7. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 148 8. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 149 9. 21A.46 Signs 150 10. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 151 F. Building Types, Forms and Standards: Allowed building forms shall be determined based on the 152 definitions in 21A.62.060. Standards for each allowed building form are listed in the Building Form 153 Standards tables below. 154 1. Urban House and Two-Family Building Form Standards: 155 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.1 156 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Urban House and Two-Family Dwelling Maximum: 35 feet Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Maximum: 2 5 2. Cottage Development Building Form Standards: 157 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.2 158 3. Row House Building Form Standards: 159 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.3 160 Building Coverage Maximum: Landscape Buffer Attached Garage (50%) of the width of the front facade of the building. of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors. No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section 21A.62.040 of this title). Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Cottage Development Maximum: 23 feet Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Maximum: 1 Building Size 850 square feet of gross floor area per Cottage Open Space Area Minimum Landscape Buffers Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House Maximum: 35 feet Minimum: Minimum: Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- 6 4. Multi-Family Residential Building Form Standards: 161 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.4 162 5. Non-residential Building Form Standards: 163 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.4 164 Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R-2, FR, or SR zoning district lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Maximum: 6 Open Space Area Minimum: Landscape Buffers Attached Garages Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Multi-Family Residential Maximum: Maximum: Minimum: Minimum: Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- the side lot line, the minimum is 10 feet unless a street or alley separates the Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R- lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Maximum: 20 Open Space Area Minimum: developments with 3 dwelling units, a minimum of 200 square feet of Landscape Buffers Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Non-Residential Maximum: Maximum: Minimum: Minimum: 7 165 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 166 is to provide an environment suitable for a variety of moderate density housing types, including single-167 family, two-family, and multi-family dwellings with a maximum height of thirty five feet (35'). This 168 district is appropriate in areas where the applicable Master Plan policies recommend a density of less than 169 thirty (30) dwelling units per acre. This district includes other uses that are typically found in a multi-170 family residential neighborhood of this density for the purpose of serving the neighborhood. Uses are 171 intended to be compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The standards for the 172 district are intended to provide for safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and 173 compatible development patterns and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood. 174 B. Uses: Uses in the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District, as specified in 175 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of this title, 176 are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21A.24.010 of this chapter and this 177 section. 178 C. Minimum Lot Area And Lot Width: The minimum lot areas and lot widths required in this district 179 are as follows: 180 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Multi-family dwellings (3 through 11 units) 9,000 square feet1 80 feet Multi-family dwellings (12 or more units) 26,000 square feet1 80 feet Municipal service uses, including City utility uses No minimum No minimum Natural open space and conservation areas, public No minimum No minimum Public pedestrian pathways, trails and greenways No minimum No minimum Public/private utility transmission wires, lines, No minimum No minimum Single-family attached dwellings (3 or more) 3,000 square feet per unit Interior: 22 feet Corner: 32 feet Single-family detached dwellings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- the side lot line, the minimum is 10 feet unless a street or alley separates the Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R- lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Open Space Area Minimum: 15% of the lot area shall be common or private open space Landscape Buffers 8 Utility substations and buildings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Other permitted or conditional uses as listed in 5,000 square feet 50 feet Qualifying provisions: 181 1. 9,000 square feet for 3 units, plus 2,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to and 182 including 11 units. 26,000 square feet for 12 units, plus 1,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit 183 up to 1 acre. For developments greater than 1 acre, 1,500 square feet for each dwelling unit is required. 184 D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height permitted in this district is thirty five 185 feet (35'). 186 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 187 1. Front Yard: Twenty feet (20'). 188 2. Corner Side Yard: Ten feet (10'). 189 3. Interior Side Yard: 190 a. Single-family detached and two-family dwellings: 191 (1) Interior lots: Four feet (4') on one side and ten feet (10') on the other. 192 (2) Corner lots: Four feet (4'). 193 b. Single-family attached: No yard is required, however, if one is provided it shall not be less than 194 four feet (4'). 195 c. Twin home dwelling: No yard is required along one side lot line while a ten foot (10') yard is 196 required on the other. 197 d. Multi-family dwellings: 198 (1) Interior lots: Side yard shall be at least ten feet (10'). 199 e. All other permitted and conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on each side. 200 4. Rear Yard: Twenty five percent (25%) of the lot depth, but not less than twenty feet (20') and need 201 not exceed twenty five feet (25'). 202 5. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located 203 in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B, "Obstructions In Required Yards", 204 of this title. 205 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard shall be no 206 greater than the established setback line of the existing building. 207 F. Required Landscape Yards: The front yard, corner side and, for interior multi-family lots, one of the 208 interior side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards. 209 G. Maximum Building Coverage: 210 1. Single-Family Detached: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 211 exceed forty five percent (45%) of the lot area. 212 2. Single-Family Attached Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings 213 shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 214 3. Two-Family And Twin Home Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory 215 buildings shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot area. 216 4. Multi-Family Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 217 exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 218 5. Existing Dwellings: For dwellings existing on April 12, 1995, the coverage of such existing 219 buildings shall be considered legally conforming. 220 9 6. Nonresidential Land Uses: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 221 exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 222 H. Landscape Buffers: Where a lot abuts a lot in a single-family or two-family residential district, a 223 landscape buffer shall be provided in accordance with chapter 21A.48 of this title. (Ord. 56-24, 2024: 224 Ord. 46-17, 2017: Ord. 66-13, 2013: Ord. 12-11, 2011: Ord. 62-09 §§ 6, 9, 2009: Ord. 61-09 § 7, 2009: 225 Ord. 35-99 §§ 18, 19, 1999: Ord. 26-95 § 2(12-12), 1995) 226 227 2. Amends Chapter 21A.24.140 as follows: 228 21A.24.140: Reserved RMF-45 MODERATE/HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 229 DISTRICT 230 231 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential 232 District is to provide an environment suitable for multi-family dwellings of a moderate/high density with 233 a maximum building height of forty five feet (45'). This district is appropriate in areas where the 234 applicable Master Plan policies recommend a density of less than forty three (43) dwelling units per acre. 235 This district includes other uses that are typically found in a multi-family residential neighborhood of this 236 density for the purpose of serving the neighborhood. Such uses are designed to be compatible with the 237 existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The standards for the district are intended to provide for 238 safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and compatible development patterns 239 and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood. 240 241 B. Uses: Uses in the RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District, as specified 242 in section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of this title, 243 are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21A.24.010 of this chapter and this 244 section. 245 246 C. Minimum Lot Area And Lot Width: The minimum lot areas and lot widths required in this district 247 are as follows: 248 249 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Land Use Minimum Lot Area Multi-family dwellings (3 to 14 units) 9,000 square feet1 80 feet Multi-family dwellings (15 or more) 21,000 square feet1 80 feet No minimum No minimum No minimum No minimum Places of worship less than 4 acres in size 12,000 square feet 140 feet Public pedestrian pathways, trails and greenways No minimum No minimum No minimum No minimum 10 Single-family attached dwellings 3,000 square feet per unit Interior: 22 feet Corner: 32 feet Single-family detached dwellings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Utility substations and buildings 5,000 square feet 50 feet 10,000 square feet 80 feet Qualifying provisions: 250 1. 9,000 square feet for 3 units, plus 1,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to and 251 including 14 units. 21,000 square feet for 15 units, plus 800 square feet for each additional dwelling unit 252 up to 1 acre. For developments greater than 1 acre, 1,000 square feet for each dwelling unit is required. 253 254 D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height permitted in this district is forty five feet 255 (45'). 256 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 257 1. Front Yard: Twenty percent (20%) of lot depth, but need not exceed twenty five feet (25'). For 258 buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required front yard shall be no greater than the existing 259 yard. 260 2. Corner Side Yard: 261 a. Single-family attached dwellings: Ten feet (10'). 262 b. Multi-family dwellings: Twenty feet (20'). 263 c. All other permitted and conditional uses: Twenty feet (20'). 264 3. Interior Side Yard: 265 a. Single-family attached dwelling: No yard is required, however if one is provided it shall not be 266 less than four feet (4'). 267 b. Multi-family dwellings: The minimum yard shall be eight feet (8'); provided, that no principal 268 building is erected within ten feet (10') of a building on an abutting lot. 269 c. All other permitted and conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on each side. 270 4. Rear Yard: The rear yard shall be twenty five percent (25%) of the lot depth, but need not exceed 271 thirty feet (30'). 272 5. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located 273 in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B, "Obstructions In Required Yards", 274 of this title. 275 F. Required Landscape Yards: The front yard, corner side and, for interior lots, one of the interior side 276 yards shall be maintained as a landscape yard except that single-family attached dwellings, no interior 277 side yard shall be required. 278 G. Maximum Building Coverage: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall 279 not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 280 H. Landscape Buffers: Where a lot abuts a lot in a single-family or two-family residential district, a 281 landscape buffer shall be provided in accordance with chapter 21A.48, "Landscaping And Buffers", of 282 this title. 283 284 285 286 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A.24.130 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential 45 Districts Petition No.: PLNPC2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends 21A.37.060 so that design standard requirements in residential districts are separated by building type. • Amends 21A.37.060 to update design standards for the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends Chapter 21A.37.060 as follows: 1 21A.37.060: DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT: 2 This section identifies each design standard and to which zoning districts the standard applies. If a box is 3 checked (X) or noted with a dimension, that standard is required. If a box is blank, it is not required. If a 4 specific dimension or detail of a design standard differs among zoning districts or differs from the 5 definition, it will be indicated within the box. In cases when a dimension in this table conflicts with a 6 dimension in the definition, the dimensions listed in the table shall take precedence. 7 Table 21A.37.060 8 A. Residential Districts 9 1. Standards for Single-family, Urban House, Two-family, and Cottage Development Building 10 Forms: 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/16/25__________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 12 2. Standards for Row House Building Form 13 14 3. Standards for Multi-Family Building Form 15 3 16 4. Standards for all Other Building Forms 17 A. Residential Districts: 18 Standard District 4 (Code Section) RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 FB-UN1 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050 A1) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050 B3) 50 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050 B4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050 C1) 20 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050 C2) 15 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050 D) X Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050 E) 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050F) Upper floor step back (feet) (21A.37.050) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050H) Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050I) Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050K) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050M) 19 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A Assorted References Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): 1. Amends the titles found in the table of contents of 21A.24 to reflect the change moving the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts in a single chapter. 2. Amends Chapter 21A.22.010 to reflect the change moving the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts in a single chapter. 3. Amends Chapter 21A.33.020 to update permitted and conditional land uses in both the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. 4. Amends Chapter 21A.34.020.M.2 to update section references. 5. Amends Table 21A.40.090 to update section references. 6. Amends Chapter 21A.44.060.A to update section references. 7. Amends Chapter 21A.44.080.B to update section references. 8. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.G.2 to update section references. 9. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.H.2 to update section references. 10. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.A.4.c to update section references. 11. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.B.4.c to update section references. 12. Amends 21A.55.020.B.4.a to eliminate the lot area limits for waiving density requirements to converting nonconforming commercial properties in RMF districts through a Planned Development. 13. Amends Chapter 21A.55.060 to update section references to only include RMF-45 and reduce the minimum required area for Planned Development. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends the titles found in the table of contents of 21A.24 as follows: 1 21A.24.130: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential Districts 2 21A.24.140: RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 3 2. Amends Chapter 21A.22.010 as follows: 4 21A.22.010: Zoning Districts 5 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 6 districts: 7 Section Reference District Name 21A.24.130 RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential Districts APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __7/16/25__________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 3. Amends Chapter 21A.33.020, modifying only the RMF-35 and RMF-45 columns, as follows: 8 21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 9 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: 10 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings C3 C3 Affordable housing incentives development P P Community garden P P Community recreation center C C Daycare center, adult P CP Daycare center, child P P Dwelling, assisted living facility (large) CP P Dwelling, assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P Dwelling, assisted living facility (small) P P Dwelling, congregate care facility (large) CP CP Dwelling, congregate care facility (small) P P Dwelling; dormitory, fraternity, sorority Dwelling, group home (large) CP CP Dwelling, group home (small) P P Dwelling, manufactured home P P Dwelling, multi- family P P Dwelling, residential support (large) P CP Dwelling, residential support (small) CP CP 3 Dwelling, rooming (boarding) house P CP Dwelling, single- family (attached) P P Dwelling, twin home P P Governmental facility C C Home occupation P1 P1 Municipal service use, including City utility use and police and fire station C C Nursing care facility P P Office, excluding medical and dental clinic and office Parking, off site Parking, park and ride lot shared with existing use P6 P6 Place of worship on lots less than 4 acres in size C C Plazas P P School, seminary and religious institute C C Utility, building or structure P5 P5 Qualifying provisions: 11 1. Subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title. 12 2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no 13 more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved 14 after April 12, 1995). 15 3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of subsection 21A.52.060.A. 16 4. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.150 of this title. 17 5. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations. 18 6. Prohibited when it includes the demolition of a dwelling unit. 19 4. Amends Chapter 21A.34.020.M.2.a as follows: 20 21A.34.020: H HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT: 21 M. Reconstruction 22 2. Modifications authorized: The following modifications are authorized for reconstruction 23 in accordance with this Subsection: 24 a. Density: The qualifying provisions for density found in the minimum lot area and lot 25 width tables of the zoning district do not apply to the proposed reconstruction, and in 26 4 the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per 27 dwelling unit does not apply. 28 5. Amends Table 21A.40.090, modifying only the RMF-35 and RMF-45 rows, as follows: 29 TABLE 21A.40.090 30 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 31 Notes: 32 P =Permitted use C =Conditional use 33 1. Allowed as a permitted use on a residential building consisting of 4 or more attached dwelling 34 units and on nonresidential buildings. Zoning Administrator approval is required to assure 35 compliance to subsection EC2a of this section. 36 6. Amends the headings in Table 21A.44.040 -A. Other than identified below, there are no 37 other changes to the table. 38 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Parking General Context Transit Context and MU-11 located fixed- rail transit; Aall not listed in and MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¾ mile from fixed- rail transit; SR-3, FB-UN1, MU-2, MU- -5, MU-6, MU- 8, and MU-11 mile and ¼ mile from fixed-rail transit; D-2 MU-5, MU-6, MU- 8, and MU-11 located within ¼ mile of fixed-rail transit; D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, UI Wall Mount3 Roof Mount Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Less Than 2' 3 Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Greater Than 2' Wide3 Lattice Tower Stealth Height Limit But Not To Is Less) Exceeding The Height Limit Of The Zone Up To 30 Height Limit But Not To Is Less) The Height Limit Of The Zone Up To 30 RMF-35 P1 5 Distance to fixed-rail transit shall be measured radially in a straight line from the closest point of the subject property line to the closest point of a fixed-rail transit station platform 7. Amends headings in Table 21A.44.040-C. Other than identified below, there are no other 39 changes to the table. 40 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) USE General Context Transit Context MU-11 located more than ¾ mile to fixed- transit; Aall zoning districts not listed in MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¾ mile from fixed-rail transit; SR-3, FB-UN1, MU-2, MU-3, 8, and MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¼ mile from fixed- rail MU-5, MU-6, MU-8, and MU-11 located within ¼ mile of fixed- rail transit; D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, UI 8. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.G.2 as follows: 41 2. RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 zoning districts: The qualifying provisions for density 42 found in the minimum lot area and lot width tables for the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45, and 43 RMF-75 zoning districts do not apply and in the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size 44 per dwelling unit does not apply, provided the affordability requirements for Type B in Table 45 21A.52.050.G are met. 46 2. RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 zoning districts: In the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 47 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not apply, and in the RMF-75 48 zoning district, the qualifying provisions for density found in the minimum lot area and lot width 49 table do not apply, provided the affordability requirements for Type B in Table 21A.52.050.G are 50 met. 51 9. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.H.2 as follows: 52 2. Within the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45, and RMF-75 zoning districts the following provisions 53 shall apply: 54 a. Unit Mix: No more than 25% of the units in the development shall be less than 500 square 55 feet to promote a mix of unit sizes. 56 b. Parking: Unless there is a lesser parking requirement in Chapter 21A.44, only one half (0.5) 57 of an off-street parking space per unit is required in multifamily developments with less than 58 10 units. 59 c. Yards: The minimum required yards shall apply to the perimeter of the development and not 60 to the individual principal buildings within the development. 61 d. Lot width: Minimum lot width requirements do not apply. 62 10. Amends Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.c as follows: 63 6 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements of the 64 zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In the RMF-30, 65 RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 66 apply. 67 11. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.B.4.c as follows: 68 c. Minimum Lot Area, Width, and Coverage: 69 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width 70 tables of the zoning district does not apply. 71 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width 72 tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning districts: FR-1, FR-2, 73 FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 74 (3) RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts: The minimum lot size per dwelling 75 unit does not apply. 76 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the individual lot 77 or parcel within the development area. 78 12. Amends 21A.55.020.B.4.a as follows: 79 a. Developments approved as a Planned Development in In the RMF zoning districts and on 80 lots 0.20 acres or more in size, developments that change a nonconforming commercial use 81 to a residential use that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density 82 limitations of the that zoning district when approved as a planned development. 83 13. Amends Chapter 21A.55.060 as follows: 84 Table 21A.55.060 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 85 District Minimum Planned Development Size Moderate Density Multi- 86 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Warren Crummett Sent:Monday, May 19, 2025 3:33 PM To:Barlow, Aaron Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hey Aaron. Congrats on getting a positive recommendation from planning and sending that to city hall! Has much changed with timing of a July acceptance from city council? Then when would I be able to apply for an application under the new zone? On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:52 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hello Aaron, Hope you are doing well and the RMF project is going as smoothly as possible. I have a property that I am planning to buy, and the lender wanted to get confirmation on the unit count that will be allowed under the new zoning. Basically they wanted to get a letter from the city saying 10 units are possible on the property. The property is .32 acres so it is well within the new guidelines. My closing is at the end of July. Do you think it would be out of the question to ask for an informal letter from you so I can make the lender comfortable? On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, Hope you had a great weekend. Just wanted to include some food for thought as I am working on the design of 2 different RMF-35/45 properties 1. Max Height: I would love to be able to build a 4 story townhome, or at least one with a room upstairs and rooftop deck. Not having a height difference for multifamily vs row houses would be great. In my eyes, changing the use of the building will not impact how well the massing fits into the neighborhood. I understand RMF-35 would still not allow this, but for RMF-45 that could be a great addition. 2. Building Form Unit Limits: I don't think limiting a row house based on units really accomplishes anything. Right now there are limitations on the street facing facade which helps limit the size and massing of the building already. If a developer wants to create smaller units and try to hit a more affordable segment of the market, I feel they should be allowed to do so. 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Barlow, Aaron Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 12:59 PM To:Troy Rawlings Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 I’ve answered your question in green below. From: Troy Rawlings Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 10:42 AM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 Hello Aaron, A follow up to the set-back rules. The address of the subject property is 2172 S 800 E. The neighboring property directly to the east is Single Family. So are you saying that the setback is 10ft, minimum for cottage homes, row houses and apartment buildings? o I’m looking at the zoning map and your property does not abut a single-family zoning district on any side. The single-family houses next to your property are all in the RMF- 35 district and the additional setback is not required. When it is required, that additional setback is only for larger building forms: Row Houses, Apartments, and non- residential buildings—not cottages. Behind the property to the west is an alleyway, and across the alleyway to the west the property is zoned Single Family, what would be the setback for cottage type homes, row houses and apartments? o Since it is zoned RMF-35 not additional setback is required. For parking, what is a standard parking space size? What if the property is located within 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile within public transportation? Can I have fewer parking spaces? o Parking dimension requirements are listed in the Salty Lake City Off-street Parking Manual (found here: https://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Guides/off-street-parking- manual.pdf). It varies based on a number of factors. o There are parking reductions available to projects within ½ mile of fixed rail in 21A.44 of the zoning regulations. Thank you, Troy On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:14 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: Hi Troy, Thanks for reaching out! I have tried to answer your questions as best I can below: 2 From what I understand the number of units is dictated by lot frontage width and the total acreage (square feet). However, the frontage width will no longer apply potentially if the rules change, Is this correct? o That is correct. Current regulations have a minimum lot width requirement. These are being eliminated, and only the minimum lot size will determine the number of units. If the rule changes then the lot at 2182 S 800 E of .22 acres or 9,583 sq feet would equate to a maximum of 19 units? o For cottage developments, the minimum lot area (density limit) is 500 square feet per unit, so the maximum number of cottages you could build on the lot would be 19. Every other building type in the RMF proposal (Duplexes, Rowhouses, and Apartments) has a minimum lot area of 750 square feet per unit, which would allow for 12 units. Units within cottage developments are typically smaller than other unit types. They cannot have more than 850 square feet of gross floor area (That’s the sq. ft. number usually provided in real estate listings—the floor area of the living space) and must be shorter than 23 feet in height (flat or pitched roof). Could I build a smaller apartment-style complex or condos? o Yes! Apartments are allowed in the proposal, up to 35 feet in height in the RMF-35 district (where your property is located). With a minimum lot area of 750 square feet per unit, your property could have up to 12 units. They can be rented or sold in your case, there is a limit of 20 units per apartment building. A project may have more, but individual buildings are limited to 20. What does a cottage court building style look like? o Cottage developments can come in many forms. Individual units can be standalone, detached buildings, or they can be attached in rows. They can face an internal courtyard or sit in a line, facing the street. Each building can sit on its own lot, or the buildings can all be on one parcel (similar to rowhouses). If a cottage development project includes garages, they cannot be attached to the individual units. Here are some photo examples: 649 E 700 S 3 852 S 800 E What will the setback rules be? o Setbacks would apply to the entire development site and not between individual units (you are only limited by building and fire codes in that regard). Setbacks vary based on the type of building. Smaller buildings, such as cottage developments, single-family houses, and twin homes, have a 4-foot side yard setback and a 10-foot rear yard setback. Larger building types, like apartments and rowhouses, are required to have additional setbacks when a project directly abuts a single-family zoning district (10-foot side yard and 15-foot rear-yard setbacks). Otherwise, they’re the same as the other building types (the tables on pages 5 and 6 in the draft ordinance lay out the requirements for each building type). o Since the setbacks only apply to the perimeter, cottage development units are permitted to be attached like a rowhouse or twin- under 23 feet and less than 850 feet of internal floor area). What parking requirements will there be? o The proposal would require one space per dwelling unit, no matter the unit type, size, or bedroom count. When will the meeting take place when this decision will be final? 4 o I am currently working on the document that we will send to the City Council (I am waiting for a few things from our Attorney’s office) and should have something sent to them by the end of this month. Hopefully, the City Council will review the proposal sometime in July. They would then need to hold a public hearing and make an official decision. I have been saying mid to late fall (October- go well (based on how long similar proposals have taken in the past). How long after the decision is made, will the changes take effect? o That will be up to the City Council, but it is typically immediate with a small gr ace period, where the old regulations are also available if a property owner or developer so chooses. The only delay would be the time it takes for the new regulations to be published—typical 1-2 weeks. Please let me know if you have any follow- the project over the phone if that is easier for you (I know it helps me when I want to talk through a scenario). Thank you! Sincerely, AARON BARLOW, AICP | (he/him) Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: 801.535.6182 | Cell: 801.872.8389 Email: aaron.barlow@slc.gov WWW.SLC.GOV SLC.GOV/PLANNING Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. From: Troy Rawlings Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:51 PM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Fwd: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 Hello Aaron, 5 I am inquiring about the potential changes to rules around density for RMF-35 and RMF-45 plats. From what I understand the number of units is dictated by lot frontage width and the total acreage (square feet). However, the frontage width will no longer apply potentially if the rules change, Is this correct? Could you confirm a few things for me: - of 19 units? Could I build a smaller apartment style complex or condos? What does cottage court building style look like? -What will the setback rules be? -What parking requirements will there be? -When will the meeting take place when this decision will be final? -How long after the decision is made, will the changes take effect? Thank you, Troy Rawlings ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gilmore, Kristina <kristina.gilmore@slc.gov> Date: Wed, May 28, 2025 at 3:10 PM Subject: RE: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 To: Troy Rawlings 7 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Troy Rawlings Date: Thu, May 22, 2025 at 1:00 PM Subject: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 To: Elmore, Noah <Noah.Elmore@slc.gov> Hello Noah, Quick question. For the subject address 2172 S 800 E, the property is approximately 60 feet wide and is .22 acres or just over 9,583 sq ft. According to the table of SLC, for me to have up to 11 units the property must be 80 feet wide, or could I get up to 11 units at 60 feet wide? Or simply ask, how many total units could I build on this lot? I know that there was a rule change recently that consolidated RMF-35 and RMF-40, so is there more flexibility to add more units than existing 4 on the property. I want to tear is down and build more missing middle. Thank you, Troy -- 8 TROY RAWLINGS | Realtor® Realty ONE Group | Rawlings Real Estate 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Warren Crummett Sent:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 11:44 AM To:Barlow, Aaron Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Aaron, Hope you're enjoying summer. I was wondering if any of the code has changed from the March 5th edition of the code that you sent to me? If it has changed, could you please send? Also, how's the timeline for the next meeting looking? I believe they passed the budget Thanks for all your help! On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 9:38 AM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, a property? If I wanted to do that for RMF-35, would it be after the decision date I could apply for a zoning certification letter that states this? Thanks for helping me work through this On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:28 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: The hearing might be in August, but yeah, that’s essentially the timeline we expect (if thing don’t get slowed down). From: Warren Crummett Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 1:23 PM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Gotcha. And that is a July public hearing and a September decision date unless there is opposition? 3 Then when would I be able to apply for an application under the new zone? On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:52 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hello Aaron, Hope you are doing well and the RMF project is going as smoothly as possible. I have a property that I am planning to buy, and the lender wanted to get confirmation on the unit count that will be allowed under the new zoning. Basically they wanted to get a letter from the city saying 10 units are possible on the property. The property is .32 acres so it is well within the new guidelines. My closing is at the end of July. Do you think it would be out of the question to ask for an informal letter from you so I can make the lender comfortable? On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, Hope you had a great weekend. Just wanted to include some food for thought as I am working on the design of 2 different RMF-35/45 properties 1. Max Height: I would love to be able to build a 4 story townhome, or at least one with a room upstairs and rooftop deck. Not having a height difference for multifamily vs row houses would be great. In my eyes, changing the use of the building will not impact how well the massing fits into the neighborhood. I understand RMF-35 would still not allow this, but for RMF-45 that could be a great addition. 4 2. Building Form Unit Limits: I don't think limiting a row house based on units really accomplishes anything. Right now there are limitations on the street facing facade which helps limit the size and massing of the building already. If a developer wants to create smaller units and try to hit a more affordable segment of the market, I feel they should be allowed to do so. For instance, if I have a building form that is 150' wide and 40' deep, I can split the 150' into 6 units which is 25' wide for each unit. But if I was able, I would split the units into 20' wide or less unit sizes so I could get roughly 8 units. Both buildings are the same size, could include the same parking, etc but now I have bigger units that I have to sell for a higher price. Feel free to use this as you wish. Also I would love to see the Lake St area be included with your proposal to be RMF-45! On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:14 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Right on! Thanks On Wed, Mar 26, 2025, 4:56 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: No that will change to 15 feet Sincerely, Aaron Barlow Sent via phone, so please excuse any typos From: Warren Crummett Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:54:06 PM 6 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 8:22 AM Warren Crummett wrote: Sounds good. I don't have the info organized, so if there's anything in particular could you please let me know? On the proforma, yes I would be happy to help. Townhomes or apartments? On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:16 PM Barlow, Aaron <aaron.barlow@slc.gov> wrote: Hi Warren, That would be great! I’m happy to take a look at anything you have put together. If I gave you an address, would you be able to do help me with a baseline proforma calculation for the property’s development potential? Thank you! Sincerely, AARON BARLOW, AICP | (he/him) Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: 801.535.6182 | Cell: 801.872.8389 Email: aaron.barlow@slc.gov WWW.SLC.GOV SLC.GOV/PLANNING Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. This page has intentionally been left blank Properties 1. 8 E Hillside Ave • Capitol Hill Neighborhood Plan • High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 321 & 323 S 600 E and 602 E 300 S • Central Community Plan • Medium Residential / Mixed Use 1 Properties 1.120, 126, & 130 W Mead Ave • Ballpark Station Area Plan • Central 9th Corridor Area 2. 1414 S West Temple • Ballpark Station Area Plan • Medium Density Transition Area Peoples Freeway Park 3. 976 & 996 S 200 E • Central Community Plan • Medium High Density 1 2 3 Properties 1. 2321 E 2100 S • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 2673 S Preston St • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 1418 S 1100 E • Central Community Plan • Low Residential / Mixed Use 2. 1945 & 1949 S 1300 E • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan 1 2 Properties 1. 351 S Concord St • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node 2. 866, 870, 876 W 700 S and 665 S 900 W • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node • Nonresidential Use 1 2 Properties 1. 1659, 1671, & 1677 W 300 S • Westside Master Plan • Located at Regional Node and Redwood Rd Corridor 2. 351 S Concord St • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node 1 2 Properties 1. 1121 E Brickyard Rd • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY www.slc.gov/council/ TO:City Council Members FROM: Michael Sanders Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:October 21, 2025 RE:WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE FIRE CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE During the 2025 legislative session, the Utah State Legislature passed House Bill 48. As part of this bill, municipalities are required to “adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building standards.”1 Previously, this requirement was optional for cities.2 If a municipality fails to comply, they risk the State choosing not to pay reimbursement costs associated with fighting wildfire.3 The standards which the City is required to adopt are the 2006 edition of the Utah Wildland Urban Interface Code, issued by the International Code Council, with the alternatives or amendments approved by the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands. This building code would only apply to the parcels identified in Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map (Attachment A of the draft ordinance.4) It is not a citywide application. The map being considered in this ordinance should not be confused with the State map which is being developed which will access fees to certain high risk WUI properties. This difference is addressed on page two of this report. Goal of the briefing: Prepare to consider the ordinance at the November 25th 2025 Formal Meeting. A Public Hearing will be held regarding this proposal on November 18th. POLICY QUESTIONS 1.The Council may wish to ask the Administration what engagement it has had or will have with legislators to help address resident concerns with possible future State legislation updates on WUI code compliance such as county fees and insurance cancelation. 1 H.B. 48 lines 430-433 2 It was not uncommon for cities along the Wasatch Front to adopt WUI code standards prior to the State mandate. Sandy, Draper, and Park City have managed WUI codes previously to the State mandate. 3 H.B. 48 lines 498-505 4 Transmittal pages 11 – 15 Page | 3 ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION This ordinance does three main things. 1. Complies with H.B 48 which requires local governments with an Urban Wildland Interface to adopt the WUI Code 2. Imposes the WUI Code on certain properties in the City which are highlighted in yellow on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map 3. Establishes that in cases of conflict between the City Zoning Code and the WUI Code, the WUI Code takes precedence over the Zoning Code with the exceptions of historic designation and the provisions of the Riparian Corridor Overlay which would require Public Utilities and the Fire Official to find a solution that meets the intent of both codes The intent is for the WUI Code to apply when a property owner seeks a building permit for a new principal structure, major addition, or roof replacement. The landscaping and vegetation requirements in the code may be enforced after adoption. This is commonly understood in the WUI Code as “defensible space” which limits the height and type of vegetation within certain distances of structures. The Legislature is expected to make further modifications to the state-adopted WUI Code in the coming years. The proposed amendment is drafted to self-update to whatever WUI regulations are adopted at the State level in Utah Code 15A-2-103(2), so no additional City Code amendments will be required to stay current with the State WUI Code. In the event that new properties need to be added to the map, the standard map amendment and public hearing process would apply. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map was created in coordination with the State Division of Forrest, Fire, and State Lands. The map went through several iterations as the Fire Department and other City representatives met with property owners and community organizations. The Fire Department went parcel by parcel to identify fire risk, fuel types, and defensible space needs. The goal of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map is to develop city resiliency and defensible positions in the event of a wildfire. The Fire Department presented at 11 Community Council meetings and the Greater Avenues Fair. For more information on the public process and comments, please see pages 16 – 17 of the Planning Division Staff Report. During the Planning Commission Hearing on September 24, 2025, many residents expressed concern at aspects of H.B. 48 which are not in control by the City. The bill sections that address those issues are summarized below H.B 48 lines 119 – 154 - Wildland Urban Interface Evaluation and Fees Properties in identified high-risk wildland urban interface areas will be evaluated each year by either the State or the County. The evaluation is focused on fire risk factors and uses a triage scale. Beginning in 2026, the State requires counties to assess an annual fee on these properties. The amount has not yet been set, but it will be determined by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands. The City does not control the fee level. Property owners will be informed of their property’s classification and provided with information on steps and resources to help lower their risk rating which may lower the fee in future years. H.B. 48 lines 156 – 222 - Insuring Wildland Urban Interface Property Insurance companies that provide property or casualty coverage in Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas must use the official wildfire risk boundary established by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands to determine whether a property is considered “high risk.” The “wildfire risk boundary” is not the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map but may have some overlap. Insurers may use additional fire hazard data for rate setting or underwriting only if it aligns with that state- defined boundary and complies with insurance laws and rules. Property owners may file complaints with the Page | 3 Utah Insurance Department if they believe insurers are not following these rules; the department has authority to investigate and enforce compliance. Property Assessment Update on Assessment of City Properties Compiling a list of all city properties and prioritizing the wildfire risk Tracking these risks in a city owned software (Cartegraph) Implementing the Defensible Space Assessment starting with the highest priorities Determination of mitigation projects based on the Defensible Space Assessments ATTACHMENTS 2006 U W U I C TAH ILDLAND- RBAN NTERFACE ODE 2006 UtahWildland-Urban Interface Code First Printing:July 2006 Second Printing:October 2006 Third Printing:March 2007 Fourth Printing:February 2008 Fifth Printing:June 2008 COPYRIGHT © 2006 by INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. ALLRIGHTSRESERVED.This2006 UtahWildland-Urban InterfaceCode containssubstantialcopyrightedmaterialfromthe 2003 International Wildland-Urban InterfaceCode,whichisacopyrighted work owned by theInternationalCodeCouncil,Inc. Withoutadvancewrittenpermissionfromthecopyrightowner,nopartofthisbookmaybereproduced,distributedortransmittedin anyformorbyanymeans,including,withoutlimitation,electronic,opticalormechanicalmeans(bywayofexampleandnotlimita- tion,photocopying,orrecordingbyorinaninformationstorageretrievalsystem).Forinformationonpermissiontocopymaterial exceeding fair use, please contact: Publications, 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, IL 60478-5771. Phone 1-888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233). Trademarks: “International Code Council,” the “International Code Council” logo and the “International Residential Code” are trademarks of the International Code Council, Inc. PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. PREFACE Introduction Internationally,codeofficialsrecognizetheneedforamodern,up-to-datecodeaddressingthemitigationoffireintheurban-wildlandin- terface.The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code™,inthis2003edition,isdesignedtobridgethegapbetweenenforcementofthe International Building Codeand International Fire Codebymitigatingthehazardofwildfiresthroughmodelcoderegulations,which safeguard the public health and safety in all communities, large and small. Thiscomprehensiveurban-wildlandinterfacecodeestablishesminimumregulationsforlanduseandthebuiltenvironmentindesig- natedurban-wildlandinterfaceareasusingprescriptiveandperformance-relatedprovisions.Itisfoundedondatacollectedfromtestsand fireincidents,technicalreportsandmitigationstrategiesfromaroundtheworld.This2003editionisfullycompatiblewithallthe Interna- tional Codes™(“I-Codes”™)published by the International Code Council(ICC), including the International Building Code, ICC Electrical Code™, International Energy Conservation Code, International Existing Builiding Code, International Fire Code, Interna- tional Fuel Gas Code, International Mechanical Code, ICC Performance Code™, International Plumbing Code, International Pri- vate Sewage Disposal Code, International Property Maintenance Code, International Residential Codeand International Zoning Code. The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code provisionsprovidemanybenefits,includingthemodelcodedevelopmentprocess, whichoffersaninternationalforumforfiresafetyprofessionalstodiscussperformanceandprescriptivecoderequirements.Thisforum providesanexcellentarenatodebateproposedrevisions.Thismodelcodealsoencouragesinternationalconsistencyintheapplicationof provisions. Development Thisisthefirsteditionofthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (2003)andistheculminationofaneffortinitiatedin2001by theICCandthethreestatutorymembersoftheInternationalCodeCouncil:BuildingOfficialsandCodeAdministratorsInternational,Inc. (BOCA),InternationalConferenceofBuildingOfficials(ICBO)andSouthernBuildingCodeCongressInternational(SBCCI).Theintent wastodraftacomprehensivesetofregulationsformitigatingthehazardtolifeandpropertyfromtheintrusionoffirefromwildlandexpo- sures and fire from adjacent structures, and preventing structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. Technical content of the 2000 Wildland- Urban Interface Code,publishedbytheInternationalFireCodeInstitute,wasutilizedasthebasisforthedevelopment,followed bythepublicationofthe2001FinalDraft.This2003editionisbasedontheFinalDraft,withchangesapprovedinthe2002ICCCodeDe- velopment Process. A new edition such as this is promulgated every three years. Withthedevelopmentandpublicationofthefamilyof International Codes in2000,thecontinueddevelopmentandmaintenanceofthe modelcodesindividuallypromulgatedbyBOCA(“BOCANationalCodes”),ICBO(“UniformCodes”)andSBCCI(“StandardCodes”) wasdiscontinued.The2003 International Codes,aswellastheirpredecessors—the2000 International Codes—areintendedtobethesuc- cessor set of codes to those codes previously developed by BOCA,ICBOandSBCCI. Thedevelopmentofasinglefamilyofcomprehensiveandcoordinated International Codes wasasignificantmilestoneinthedevelop- mentofregulationsforthebuiltenvironment.Thetimingofthispublicationmirrorsamilestoneinthechangeinstructureofthemodel codes,namely,thependingconsolidationofBOCA,ICBOandSBCCIintotheICC.Theactivitiesandservicespreviouslyprovidedbythe individual model code organizations will be the responsibility of the consolidated ICC. Thiscodeisfoundedonprinciplesintendedtomitigatethehazardfromfiresthroughthedevelopmentofprovisionsthatadequatelypro- tectpublichealth,safetyandwelfare;provisionsthatdonotunnecessarilyincreaseconstructioncosts;provisionsthatdonotrestricttheuse ofnewmaterials,productsormethodsofconstruction;andprovisionsthatdonotgivepreferentialtreatmenttoparticulartypesorclassesof materials, products or methods of construction. Adoption The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code isavailableforadoptionandusebyjurisdictionsinternationally.Itsusewithinagovern- mentaljurisdictionisintendedtobeaccomplishedthroughadoptionbyreferenceinaccordancewithproceedingsestablishingthejurisdic- tion’s laws. At the time of adoption, jurisdictions should insert the appropriate information in provisions requiring specific local information,suchasthenameoftheadoptingjurisdiction.Theselocationsareshowninbracketedwordsinsmallcapitallettersinthecode and in the sample ordinance. The sample adoption ordinance on page v addresses several key elements of a code adoption ordinance, including the information required for insertion into the code text. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE iii 10b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_iii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:47:06 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Maintenance The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code iskeptup-to-datethrough thereviewofproposed changessubmittedbycode enforcing officials, industry representatives, design professionals and other interested parties. Proposed changes are carefully considered through an open code development process in which all interested and affected parties may participate. ThecontentsofthisworkaresubjecttochangeboththroughtheCodeDevelopmentCyclesandthegovernmentalbodythatenactsthe codeintolaw.Formoreinformationregardingthecodedevelopmentprocess,contacttheCodeandStandardDevelopmentDepartmentof the International Code Council. Althoughthedevelopmentprocedureofthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code assuresthehighestdegreeofcare,ICCand thefoundingmembersofICC—BOCA,ICBOandSBCCI—theirmembersandthoseparticipatinginthedevelopmentofthiscodedonot acceptanyliabilityresultingfromcomplianceornoncompliancewiththeprovisions,becauseICCanditsfoundingmembersdonothave thepowerorauthoritytopoliceorenforcecompliancewiththecontentsofthiscode.Onlythegovernmentalbodythatenactsthecodeinto law has such authority. Authority TheDivisionisrequiredtoestablishminimumstandardsforawildlandfireordinanceandspecifyminimumstandardsforwildlandfire training,certificationandwildlandfiresuppressionequipmentinaccordancewithsubsections65A-8-6(3)(a)and65A-8-6(3)(b).Thisre- quirement is promulgated under general rule-making authority of subsection 65A-1-4(2). iv 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 20b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_iv.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:47:24 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen ORDINANCE The International Codes aredesignedandpromulgatedtobeadoptedbyreferencebyordinance.Jurisdictionswishingtoadoptthe2003 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code asanenforceableregulationforthemitigationoffireintheurban-wildlandinterfaceshould ensurethatcertainfactualinformationisincludedintheadoptingordinanceatthetimeadoptionisbeingconsideredbytheappropriate governmentalbody.Thefollowingsampleadoptionordinanceaddressesseveralkeyelementsofacodeadoptionordinance,includingthe information required for insertion into the code text. MinimumStandardsforWildlandFireOrdinance Thedivisionusesthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code asabasisforestablishingtheminimumstandardsdiscussedinthis document.AcountyordinancethatatleastmeetstheminimumstandardsshouldbeinplacebySeptember2006. TheDivisionincorporatesbyreferencethe2003 International Code Council Wildland-Urban Interface Code astheminimumstandard forwildlandfireordinanceinconjunctionwithUtahrequirements. SAMPLE ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE ORDINANCE NO.________ An ordinance of the [JURISDICTION]adopting the 2003 edition of the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code as currently amendedbythedivisionofForestry,FireandStateLands,regulatingandgoverningthemitigationofhazardtolifeandpropertyfromthe intrusionoffirefromwildlandexposures,firefromadjacentstructuresandpreventionofstructurefiresfromspreadingtowildlandfuelsin the [JURISDICTION];providingfortheissuanceofpermitsandcollectionoffeestherefor;repealingOrdinanceNo.______ofthe [JU- RISDICTION]and all other ordinances and parts of the ordinances in conflict therewith. The [GOVERNING BODY]of the [JURISDICTION]does ordain as follows: Section1.Thatacertaindocument,three(3)copiesofwhichareonfileintheofficeofthe [TITLEOFJURISDICTION’SKEEPEROFRE- CORDS]of [NAMEOFJURISDICTION],beingmarkedanddesignatedasthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code,2003edi- tion, including Appendix Chapters [FILL IN THE APPENDIX CHAPTERS BEING ADOPTED ], as published by the International Code Council,beandisherebyadoptedastheUrban-WildlandInterfaceCodeofthe [JURISDICTION],intheStateof [STATENAME]forreg- ulatingandgoverningthemitigationofhazardtolifeandpropertyfromtheintrusionoffirefromwildlandexposures,firefromadjacent structuresandpreventionofstructurefiresfromspreadingtowildlandfuelsashereinprovided;providingfortheissuanceofpermitsand collectionoffeestherefor;andeachandalloftheregulations,provisions,penalties,conditionsandtermsofsaidUrban-WildlandInterface Codeonfileintheofficeofthe [JURISDICTION]areherebyreferredto,adopted,andmadeaparthereof,asiffullysetoutinthisordi- nance, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes, if any, prescribed in Section 2 of this ordinance. Section 2.The following sections are hereby revised: Section 101.1. Insert:[NAME OF JURISDICTION] Section3.ThatOrdinanceNo.______of [JURISDICTION]entitled [FILLINHERETHECOMPLETETITLEOFTHEORDINANCEOROR- DINANCESINEFFECTATTHEPRESENTTIMESOTHATTHEYWILLBEREPEALEDBYDEFINITEMENTION]andallotherordinancesor parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section4.Thatifanysection,subsection,sentence,clauseorphraseofthisordinanceis,foranyreason,heldtobeunconstitutional,such decisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionsofthisordinance.The [GOVERNINGBODY]herebydeclaresthatitwould havepassedthisordinance,andeachsection,subsection,clauseorphrasethereof,irrespectiveofthefactthatanyoneormoresections,sub- sections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section5.Thatnothinginthisordinanceorinthe Wildland-Urban Interface Code herebyadoptedshallbeconstruedtoaffectanysuitor proceedingimpendinginanycourt,oranyrightsacquired,orliabilityincurred,oranycauseorcausesofactionacquiredorexisting,under anyactorordinanceherebyrepealedascitedinSection2ofthisordinance;norshallanyjustorlegalrightorremedyofanycharacterbe lost, impaired or affected by this ordinance. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE v 10c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgv.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:33:06 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Section 6.Thatthe [JURISDICTION’SKEEPEROFRECORDS]isherebyorderedanddirectedtocausethisordinancetobepublished. (Anadditionalprovisionmayberequiredtodirectthenumberoftimestheordinanceistobepublishedandtospecifythatitistobeina newspaper in general circulation. Posting may also be required.) Section 7.That this ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect [TIME PERIOD]from and after the date of its final passage and adoption. Section 8.Specificboundariesofnaturalorman-madefeaturesofwildland-urbaninterfaceareasshallbeasshownonthewildlandarea interfacemap.Thelegaldescriptionofsuchareasisasdescribedasfollows:[INSERTLEGALDESCRIPTION] vi 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 20c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgvi.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:33:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 101 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 102 Authority of the Code Official . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 103 Compliance Alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 104 Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 105 Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 106 Plans and Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 107 Inspection and Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 108 Certificate of Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Section 201 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 202 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 CHAPTER 3 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Section 301 Wildland-Urban Interface Area Designations. . . . . . 9 CHAPTER 4 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . 11 Section 401 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 402 Applicability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 403 Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 404 Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 405 Fire Protection Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 CHAPTER 5 SPECIAL BUILDING CON- STRUCTION REGULATIONS . . . . 15 Section 501 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 502 Fire Hazard Severity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 503 Ignition-resistant Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 504 Class 1 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 15 505 Class 2 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 16 506 Class 3 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 17 507 Replacement or Repair of Roof Coverings. . . . . . . 18 CHAPTER 6 FIRE-PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Section 601 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 603 Defensible Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 604 Maintenance of Defensible Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 605 Spark Arresters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 606 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Installations . . . . . . . . . . 20 607 Storage of Firewood and Combustible Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 APPENDIX A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. . . . . 21 Section A101 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A102 Vegetation Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A103 Access Restrictions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A104 Ignition Source Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A105 Control of Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A106 Dumping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A107 Protection of Pumps and Water Storage Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A108 Land Use Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 APPENDIX B VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . 25 APPENDIX C FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 INDEX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE vii 10d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgvii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:34:52 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen viii 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE 20d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgviii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:42:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION101 GENERAL 101.1 Scope.The provisions of this code shall apply to the construction, alteration, movement, repair, maintenance and use of any building, structure or premises within the urban- wildland interface areas in this jurisdiction. Buildingsorconditionsinexistenceatthetimeoftheadop- tionofthiscodeareallowedtohavetheiruseoroccupancycon- tinued,ifsuchcondition,useoroccupancywaslegalatthetime oftheadoptionofthiscode,providedsuchcontinuedusedoes not constitute a distinct danger to life or property. Buildingsorstructuresmovedintoorwithinthejurisdiction shallcomplywiththeprovisionsofthiscodefornewbuildings or structures. 101.2 Objective.The objective of this code is to establish minimum regulations consistent with nationally recognized goodpracticeforthesafeguardingoflifeandproperty.Regula- tions in this code are intended to mitigate the risk to life and structures from intrusion of fire from wildland fire exposures and fire exposures from adjacent structures and to mitigate structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. Thedevelopmentanduseofpropertyinwildland-urbanin- terfaceareasisapotentialthreattolifeand property from fire andresultingerosion.Safeguardstopreventtheoccurrenceof firesandtoprovideadequatefire-protectionfacilitiestocontrol the spread of fire in wildland-urban interfaceareas shallbe in accordance with this code. This code shall supplement the jurisdiction’s building and firecodes,ifsuchcodeshavebeenadopted,toprovideforspe- cial regulations to mitigate the fire- and life-safety hazards of the wildland-urban interface areas. 101.3 Retroactivity.The provisions of the code shall apply toconditionsarisingaftertheadoptionthereof,conditionsnot legally in existence at the adoption of this code, to conditions which, in the opinion of the code official,constitute a distinct hazard to life or property. 101.4 Additions or alterations.Additions or alterations maybemadetoanybuildingorstructurewithoutrequiringthe existingbuildingorstructuretocomplywithalloftherequire- ments of this code, provided the addition or alteration con- forms to that required for a new building or structure. Exception:Provisionsofthiscodethatspecificallyapplyto existing conditions are retroactive. See Section 601.1 and Appendix A. Additions or alterations shall not be made to an existing building or structure that will cause the existing building or structuretobeinviolationofanyoftheprovisionsofthiscode norshallsuchadditionsoralterationscausetheexistingbuild- ingorstructuretobecomeunsafe.Anunsafeconditionshallbe deemed to have been created if an addition or alteration will causetheexistingbuildingorstructuretobecomestructurally unsafeoroverloaded;willnotprovideadequateaccessincom- pliancewiththeprovisionsofthiscodeorwillobstructexisting exits or access; will create a fire hazard; will reduce required fireresistanceorwillotherwisecreateconditionsdangerousto human life. 101.5 Maintenance.Allbuildings,structures,landscapema- terials, vegetation, defensible space or other devices or safe- guards required by this code shall be maintained in conformance to the code edition under which installed. The ownerortheowner’sdesignatedagentshallberesponsiblefor the maintenance of buildings, structures, landscape materials and vegetation. SECTION 102 AUTHORITY OF THE CODE OFFICIAL 102.1 Powersanddutiesofthecodeofficial.Thecodeoffi- cialisherebyauthorizedtoadministerandenforcethiscode,or designatedsectionsthereof,andallordinancesofthejurisdic- tion pertaining to designated wildland-urban interface areas. Forsuchpurposes,thecodeofficialshallhavethepowersofa law enforcement officer. 102.2 Interpretations, rulesand regulations.Thecode of- ficialshallhavethepowertorenderinterpretationsofthiscode andtoadoptandenforcerulesandsupplementalregulationsto clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, rulesandregulationsshallbeinconformancetotheintentand purpose of this code. Acopyofsuchrulesandregulationsshallbefiledwiththe clerk of the jurisdiction and shall be in effect immediately thereafter.Additionalcopiesshallbeavailablefordistribution to the public. 102.3 Liability of the code official.The code official chargedwiththeenforcementofthiscode,actingingoodfaith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by thiscodeorotherpertinentlaworordinance,shallnotthereby be rendered personally liable for damages that may accrue to personsorpropertyasaresultofanactorbyreasonofanactor omissioninthedischargeofsuchduties.Asuitbroughtagainst thecodeofficialoremployeebecauseofsuchactoromission performedbythecodeofficialoremployeeintheenforcement ofanyprovisionofsuchcodesorotherpertinentlawsorordi- nances implemented through the enforcement of this code or enforcedbythecodeenforcementagencyshallbedefendedby this jurisdiction until final termination of such proceedings, andanyjudgmentresultingtherefromshallbeassumedbythis jurisdiction. The code enforcement agency or its parent juris- dictionshallnotbeheldasassuminganyliabilitybyreasonof theinspectionsauthorizedbythiscodeoranypermitsorcertif- icates issued under this code. 102.4 Otheragencies.Whenrequestedtodosobythecode official,otherofficialsofthisjurisdictionshallassistandcoop- 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 1 CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION 101_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:04 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen erate with the code official in the discharge of the duties re- quired by this code. SECTION103 COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES 103.1 Practical difficulties.When there are practical diffi- cultiesinvolvedincarryingouttheprovisionsofthiscode,the codeofficialisauthorizedtograntmodificationsforindividual cases on application in writing by the owner or a duly autho- rizedrepresentative.Thecodeofficialshallfirstfindthataspe- cialindividualreasonmakesenforcementofthestrictletterof thiscodeimpractical,themodificationisinconformancetothe intentandpurpose ofthiscode,andthemodificationdoesnot lessenanyfireprotectionrequirementsoranydegreeofstruc- turalintegrity.Thedetailsofanyactiongrantingmodifications shallberecordedandenteredintothefilesofthecodeenforce- ment agency. Ifthecodeofficialdeterminesthatdifficultterrain,dangerof erosionorotherunusualcircumstancesmakestrictcompliance withthevegetationcontrolprovisionsofthecodedetrimental to safety or impractical, enforcement thereof may be sus- pended, provided that reasonable alternative measures are taken. 103.2 Technical assistance.To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and usesattendingthedesign,operationoruseofabuildingorpre- misessubjecttotheinspectionofthecodeofficial,thecodeof- ficial is authorized to require the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without charge to the jurisdiction, a technical opinion and re- port. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire safety specialty organi- zation acceptable to the code official and the owner and shall analyze the fire safety of the design, operation or use of the buildingorpremises,thefacilitiesandappurtenances situated thereonandfuelmanagementforpurposesofestablishingfire hazard severity to recommend necessary changes. 103.3 Alternativematerialsormethods.Thecodeofficial, inconcurrencewithapprovalfromthebuildingofficialandfire chief, is authorized to approve alternative materials or meth- ods,providedthatthecodeofficialfindsthattheproposedde- sign,useoroperationsatisfactorilycomplieswiththeintentof thiscodeandthatthealternativeis,forthepurposeintended,at leastequivalent to the level of quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety prescribed by this code. Approvalsundertheauthorityhereincontainedshallbesubject to the approval of the building official whenever the alternate materialor method involvesmattersregulated by the Interna- tional Building Code. The code official shall require that sufficient evidence or proofbesubmittedtosubstantiateanyclaimsthatmaybemade regardingitsuse.Thedetailsofanyactiongrantingapprovalof an alternate shall be recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency. SECTION 104 APPEALS 104.1 General.To determine the suitability of alternative materialsandmethodsandtoprovideforreasonableinterpreta- tionsoftheprovisionsofthiscode,thereshallbeandherebyis createdaboardofappealsconsistingoffivememberswhoare qualifiedbyexperienceandtrainingtopassjudgmentonperti- nentmatters.Thecodeofficial,buildingofficialandfirechief shall be ex officio members, and the code official shall act as secretaryoftheboard.Theboardofappealsshallbeappointed bythelegislativebodyandshallholdofficeattheirdiscretion. Theboardshalladoptreasonablerulesandregulationsforcon- ducting its investigations and shall render decisions and find- ingsinwritingtothecodeofficial,withaduplicatecopytothe applicant. 104.2 Limitations of authority.The board of appeals shall not have authority relative to interpretation of the administra- tive provisions of this code and shall not have authority to waive requirements of this code. SECTION105 PERMITS 105.1 General.Whennototherwiseprovidedintherequire- ments of the building or fire code, permits are required in ac- cordance with Section 105. 105.2 Permits required.Unless otherwise exempted, no building or structure regulated by this code shall be erected, constructed, altered, repaired, moved, removed, converted or demolishedunlessaseparatepermitforeachbuildingorstruc- ture has first been obtained from the code official. When required by the code official, a permit shall be ob- tained for the following activities, operations, practices or functions within an wildland-urban interface area: 1. Automobile wrecking yard; 2. Candles and open flames in assembly areas; 3. Explosives or blasting agents; 4. Fireworks; 5. Flammable or combustible liquids; 6. Hazardous materials; 7. Liquefied petroleum gases; 8. Lumberyards; 9. Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing stations; 10.Open burning; 11.Pyrotechnical special effects material; 12.Tents, canopies and temporary membrane structures; 13.Tire storage; 14.Welding and cutting operations; or 15. Other activities as determined by the code official. 105.3 Work exempt from permit.Unless otherwise pro- videdintherequirementsofthebuildingorfirecode,apermit shall not be required for the following: 1. One-storydetachedaccessorybuildingsusedastooland storagesheds,playhousesandsimilaruses,providedthe floorareadoesnotexceed120squarefeet(11.15m2)and ADMINISTRATION 2 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 201_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:04 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen the structure is located more than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from the nearest adjacent structure. 2. Fences not over 6 feet (1829 mm) high. Exemption from the permit requirements of this code shall notbedeemedtograntauthorizationforanyworktobedonein any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. The code official is authorized to stipulate conditions for permits.Permitsshallnotbeissuedwhenpublicsafetywould be at risk, as determined by the code official. 105.4 Permit application.To obtain a permit, the applicant shallfirstfileanapplicationtherefor inwritingon aform fur- nishedbythecodeenforcementagencyforthatpurpose.Every such application shall: 1. Identifyanddescribethework,activity,operation,prac- ticeorfunctiontobecoveredbythepermitforwhichap- plication is made. 2. Describethelandonwhichtheproposedwork,activity, operation,practiceorfunctionistobedonebylegalde- scription, street address or similar description that will readilyidentifyanddefinitelylocatetheproposedbuild- ing, work, activity, operation, practice or function. 3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work, activity, operation, practice or function is in- tended. 4. Be accompanied by plans, diagrams, computation and specificationsand other data as required in Section 106 of this code. 5. State the valuation of any new building or structure or any addition, remodeling or alteration to an existing building. 6. Besignedbytheapplicantortheapplicant’sauthorized agent. 7. Givesuchotherdataandinformationasmayberequired by the code official. 105.5 Permit approval.Before a permit is issued, the code official, or an authorized representative, shall review and ap- prove all permitted uses, occupancies or structures. Where lawsorregulationsareenforceablebyotheragenciesordepart- ments, a joint approval shall be obtained from all agencies or departments concerned. 105.6 Permit issuance.The application, plans, specifica- tions and other datafiledby an applicantfor apermit shallbe reviewedbythecodeofficial.Ifthecodeofficialfindsthatthe work described in an application for a permit and the plan, specificationsandotherdatafiledtherewithconformtothere- quirements of thiscode, the code officialisallowed to issue a permit to the applicant. When the code official issues the permit, the code official shall endorse in writing or stamp the plans and specifications APPROVED.Suchapprovedplansandspecificationsshallnot bechanged,modifiedoralteredwithoutauthorizationfromthe codeofficial,andallworkregulatedbythiscodeshallbedone in accordance with the approved plans. 105.7 Validity of permit.The issuance or granting of aper- mitorapprovalofplans,specificationsandcomputationsshall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violationofanyoftheprovisionsofthiscodeorofanyotheror- dinanceofthejurisdiction.Permitspresumingtogiveauthority to violateor conceal the provisions of this code or other ordi- nances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. 105.8 Expiration.Every permit issued by the code official undertheprovisionsofthiscodeshallexpirebylimitationand becomenullandvoidifthebuilding,useorworkauthorizedby suchpermitisnotcommencedwithin180daysfromthedateof suchpermit,orifthebuilding,useorworkauthorizedbysuch permitissuspendedorabandonedatanytimeaftertheworkis commenced for a period of 180 days. Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for anextensionofthetimewithinwhichworkmaycommenceun- derthatpermitwhenthepermitteeisunabletocommencework withinthetimerequired by thissectionfor good and satisfac- toryreasons. Thecodeofficialmayextendthetimefor action bythepermitteeforaperiodnotexceeding180daysonwritten request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken. No permit shall be extended more than once. 105.9 Retentionofpermits.Permitsshallatalltimesbekept onthepremisesdesignatedthereinandshallatalltimesbesub- jecttoinspectionbythecodeofficialorotherauthorizedrepre- sentative. 105.10 Revocation of permits.Permits issued under this codemaybesuspendedorrevokedwhenitisdeterminedbythe code official that: 1. Itisusedbyapersonotherthanthepersontowhomthe permit was issued. 2. Itisusedforalocationotherthanthatforwhichtheper- mit was issued. 3. Anyoftheconditionsorlimitationssetforthintheper- mit have been violated. 4. The permittee fails, refuses or neglects to comply with anyorderornoticedulyservedonhimundertheprovi- sions of this code within the time provided therein. 5. Therehasbeenanyfalsestatementormisrepresentation as to material fact in the application or plans on which the permit or application was made. 6. Whenthepermitisissuedinerrororinviolationofany other ordinance, regulations or provisions of this code. Thecodeofficialisallowedto,inwriting,suspendorrevoke apermitissuedundertheprovisionsofthiscodewheneverthe permitisissuedinerrororonthebasisofincorrectinformation supplied,orinviolationofanyordinanceorregulationorany of the provisions of this code. SECTION106 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 106.1 General.Plans,engineering calculations, diagrams andotherdatashallbesubmittedinatleasttwosetswitheach applicationforapermit.Whensuchplansarenotpreparedby anarchitectorengineer,thecodeofficialmayrequiretheappli- cant submitting such plans or other data to demonstrate that state law does not require that the plans be prepared by a li- ADMINISTRATION 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 3 301_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen censed architect or engineer. The code official may require plans,computationsandspecificationstobeprepared andde- signedbyanarchitectorengineerlicensedbythestatetoprac- tice as such even if not required by state law. Exception:Submissionofplans,calculations,construction inspectionrequirementsandotherdata,ifitisfoundthatthe natureoftheworkappliedforissuchthatreviewingofplans is not necessary to obtain compliance with this code. 106.2 Information on plans and specifications.Plans and specificationsshallbedrawntoscaleuponsubstantialpaperor cloth and shall be of sufficientclarityto indicatethe location, natureandextentoftheworkproposed,andshowindetailthat it will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 106.3 Site plan.In addition to the requirements for plans in the InternationalBuildingCode,siteplansshallincludetopog- raphy, width and percent of grade of access roads, landscape andvegetationdetails,locationsofstructuresorbuildingenve- lopes,existingorproposedoverheadutilities,occupancyclas- sificationofbuildings,typesofignition-resistantconstruction of buildings, structures and their appendages, roof classifica- tion of buildings, and site water supply systems. 106.4 Vegetationmanagementplans.Whenutilizedbythe permitapplicantpursuant toSection502, vegetationmanage- mentplansshallbepreparedandshallbesubmittedtothecode officialforreviewandapprovalaspartoftheplansrequiredfor a permit. See Appendix B. 106.5 Fireprotectionplan.Whenrequiredbythecodeoffi- cialpursuanttoSection405,afireprotectionplanshallbepre- paredandshallbesubmittedtothecodeofficialforreviewand approved as a part of the plans required for a permit. 106.6 Otherdataandsubstantiation.Whenrequiredbythe codeofficial,theplansandspecificationsshallincludeclassifi- cationoffuelloading,fuelmodellight,mediumorheavy,and substantiatingdatatoverifyclassificationoffire-resistiveveg- etation. 106.7 Vicinity plan.In addition to the requirements for site plans, plans shallinclude detailsregarding the vicinitywithin 300feet(91440mm)ofpropertylines,includingotherstruc- tures,slope,vegetation,fuelbreaks,watersupplysystemsand access roads. 106.8 Retentionofplans.Onesetofapprovedplans,specifi- cationsandcomputationsshallberetainedbythecodeofficial foraperiodofnotlessthan90daysfromdateofcompletionof the work covered therein; and one set of approved plans and specifications shall be returned to the applicant, and said set shallbekeptonthesiteofthebuilding,useorworkatalltimes during which the work authorized thereby is in progress. SECTION107 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 107.1 Inspection. 107.1.1 General.All construction or work for which a permitisrequiredbythiscodeshallbesubjecttoinspection bythecodeofficialandallsuchconstructionorworkshall remainaccessibleandexposedforinspectionpurposesuntil approved by the code official. It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to remain accessible and exposed for inspection pur- poses.Neitherthecodeofficialnorthejurisdictionshallbe liableforexpenseentailedintheremovalorreplacementof any material required to allow inspection. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be con- strued to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of thiscodeorofotherordinances ofthejurisdiction.Inspec- tions presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisionsofthiscodeorofotherordinancesofthejurisdic- tion shall not be valid. Asurveyofthelotmayberequiredbythecodeofficialto verify that the mitigation features are provided and the building or structure is located in accordance with the ap- proved plans. 107.1.2 Authority to inspect.The code official shall in- spect,asoftenasnecessary,buildingsandpremises,includ- ingsuchotherhazardsorappliancesdesignatedbythecode official for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be correctedanyconditionsthatcouldreasonablybeexpected to cause fire or contribute to its spread, or any violation of thepurposeofthiscodeandofanyotherlaworstandardaf- fecting fire safety. 107.1.3 Reinspections.To determine compliance with thiscode,thecodeofficialmaycauseastructuretoberein- spected.Afeemaybeassessedforeachinspectionorrein- spectionwhensuchportionofworkforwhichinspectionis calledisnotcompleteorwhencorrectionscalledforarenot made. Reinspection fees may be assessed when the approved plansarenotreadilyavailabletotheinspector,forfailureto provideaccessonthedateforwhichinspectionisrequested or for deviating from plans requiring the approval of the code official. Toobtainareinspection,theapplicantshallpaytherein- spection fee as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction.Whenreinspectionfeeshavebeenassessed,no additionalinspectionoftheworkwillbeperformeduntilthe required fees have been paid. 107.2 Enforcement. 107.2.1 Authorizationtoissuecorrectiveordersandno- tices.Whenthecodeofficialfindsanybuildingorpremises thatare in violation of thiscode, the code officialisautho- rized to issue corrective orders and notices. 107.2.2 Service of orders and notices.Orders and no- tices authorized or required by this code shall be given or servedontheowner,operator,occupantorotherpersonre- sponsiblefortheconditionorviolationeitherbyverbalnoti- fication, personal service, or delivering the same to, and leavingitwith,apersonofsuitableageanddiscretiononthe premises;or,ifnosuchpersonisfoundonthepremises,by affixingacopythereofinaconspicuousplaceonthedoorto theentranceofsaidpremisesandbymailingacopythereof tosuchpersonbyregisteredorcertifiedmailtotheperson’s last known address. ADMINISTRATION 4 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 401_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Orders or notices that are given verbally shall be con- firmed by service in writing as herein provided. 107.3 Right of entry.Whenever necessary to make an in- spectiontoenforceanyoftheprovisionsofthiscode,orwhen- everthecodeofficialhasreasonablecausetobelievethatthere exists in any building or on any premises any condition that makessuchbuildingorpremisesunsafe,thecodeofficialisau- thorized to enter such building or premises at all reasonable timestoinspectthesameortoperformanydutyauthorizedby this code, provided that if such building or premises is occu- pied,thecodeofficialshallfirstpresentpropercredentialsand request entry; and ifsuch building or premises isunoccupied, thecodeofficialshallfirstmakeareasonableefforttolocatethe ownerorotherpersonshavingchargeorcontrolofthebuilding or premises and request entry. Ifsuchentryisrefused,thecodeofficialshallhaverecourse toeveryremedy providedbylawtosecureentry.Owners, oc- cupantsoranyotherpersonshavingcharge,careorcontrolof anybuildingorpremises,shall,afterproperrequestismadeas hereinprovided,promptlypermitentrythereinbythecodeof- ficialforthepurposeofinspectionandexaminationpursuantto this code. 107.4 Compliance with orders and notices. 107.4.1 General compliance.Orders and notices issued orservedasprovidedbythiscodeshallbecompliedwithby the owner, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the condition or violation to which the corrective order or notice pertains. Ifthebuildingorpremisesisnotoccupied, suchcorrec- tive orders or notices shall be complied with by the owner. 107.4.2 Compliance with tags.A building or premises shallnotbeusedwheninviolationofthiscodeasnotedona tag affixed in accordance with Section 107.4.1. 107.4.3 Removal and destruction of signs and tags.A signortagpostedoraffixedbythecodeofficialshallnotbe mutilated, destroyed or removed without authorization by the code official. 107.4.4 Citations.Persons operating or maintaining an occupancy,premisesorvehiclesubjecttothiscodewhoal- lowahazardtoexistorfailtotakeimmediateactiontoabate a hazard on such occupancy, premises or vehicle when or- deredornotifiedtodosobythecodeofficialshallbeguilty of a misdemeanor. 107.4.5 Unsafe conditions.Buildings, structures or pre- misesthatconstitutea firehazard or are otherwise danger- ous to human life, or which in relation to existing use constituteahazardtosafetyorhealthorpublicwelfare,by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsoles- cence,firehazard,disasterdamageorabandonmentasspec- ified in this code or any other ordinance, are unsafe conditions.Unsafebuildingsorstructuresshallnotbeused. Unsafebuildingsareherebydeclaredtobepublicnuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal, pursuant to applicable state and local laws and codes. SECTION108 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION No building, structure or premises shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building, structure, premise or portion thereof shall be made until the code official has issued a certificate of completion thereforasprovidedherein.Thecertificateofoccupancyshall notbeissueduntilthecertificateofcompletionindicatingthat theprojectisincompliancewiththiscodehasbeenissuedby the code official. Issuanceofacertificateofoccupancyshallnotbeconstrued asanapprovalofaviolationoftheprovisionsofthiscodeorof otherpertinentlawsandordinancesofthejurisdiction.Certifi- catespresumingtogiveauthoritytoviolateorcanceltheprovi- sionsofthiscodeorotherlawsorordinancesofthejurisdiction shall not be valid. ADMINISTRATION 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 5 501_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 6 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 601_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 201 GENERAL 201.1 Scope.Unless otherwise expressly stated, the follow- ing words and terms shall, for the purposes of this code, have the meanings shown in this chapter. 201.2 Interchangeability.Words stated in the present tense include the future; words stated in the masculine gender in- clude the feminine and neuter, and the singular number in- cludes the plural and the plural the singular. 201.3 Terms defined in other codes.Where terms are not defined in this code and are defined in other International Codes,suchtermsshallhavethemeaningsascribedtothemas in those codes. 201.4 Terms not defined.Where terms are not defined through the methods authorized by this section, such terms shallhavetheirordinarilyacceptedmeaningssuchasthecon- text implies. SECTION202 DEFINITIONS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.Abuildingorstructureusedto shelter or support any material, equipment, chattel or occu- pancy other than a habitable building. APPROVED.Approvalbythecodeofficialastheresultofre- view,investigationortestsconductedbythecodeofficialorby reasonofacceptedprinciplesortestsbynationalauthorities,or technical or scientific organizations. BRUSH, SHORT.Low-growingspeciesthatreachheightsof1 to3feet.Sagebrush,snowberryandrabbitbrusharesomevariet- ies. BRUSH, TALL.Arbor-like varieties of brush species and/or shortvarietiesofbroad-leaftreesthatgrowincompactgroupsor clumps.Thesegroupsorclumpsreachheightsof4to20feet.In Utah,thisincludesprimaryvarietiesofoak,maples,chokecherry, serviceberryandmahogany,butmayalsoincludeotherspecies. BUILDING.Anystructureusedorintendedforsupportingor sheltering any use or occupancy. BUILDING OFFICIAL.The officer or other designated au- thoritychargedwiththeadministrationandenforcementofthe InternationalBuildingCode,orthebuildingofficial’sdulyau- thorized representative. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION.Written documenta- tionthattheprojectorworkforwhichapermitwasissuedhas been completed in conformance with requirements of this code. CODE OFFICIAL.Theofficialdesignatedbythejurisdiction tointerpretandenforcethiscode,orthecodeofficial’sautho- rized representative. DEFENSIBLE SPACE.Anareaeithernaturalorman-made, wherematerialcapableofallowingafiretospreadunchecked hasbeentreated,clearedormodifiedtoslowtherateandinten- sityofanadvancingwildfireandtocreateanareaforfiresup- pression operations to occur. DRIVEWAY.Avehicularingressandegressroutethatserves nomorethantwobuildingsorstructures,notincludingacces- sory structures, or more than five dwelling units. FIRE AREA.The floor area, in square feet (square meters), used to determine the adequate water supply. FIRE CHIEF.The chief officer or the chief officer’s autho- rizedrepresentativeofthefiredepartmentservingthejurisdic- tion. FIRE PROTECTION PLAN.A document prepared for a specificprojectordevelopmentproposed forthewildland-ur- baninterfacearea.Itdescribeswaystominimizeandmitigate the fire problems created by the project or development, with thepurposeofreducingimpactonthecommunity’sfireprotec- tion delivery system. FIRE WEATHER.Weatherconditionsfavorabletotheigni- tion and rapid spread of fire. In wildfires, this generally in- cludeshightemperaturescombinedwithstrongwindsandlow humidity. FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION.Theuse of materials and systems in the design and construction of a building or structure to safeguard against the spread of fire withinabuildingorstructureandthespreadoffiretoorfrom buildings or structures to the wildland-urban interface area. FLAME SPREAD RATING.Asusedhereinreferstorating obtainedaccordingtotestsconductedasspecifiedbyanation- ally recognized standard. FUEL BREAK.Anarea,strategicallylocatedforfightingan- ticipated fires, where the native vegetation has been perma- nentlymodifiedorreplacedsothatfiresburningintoitcanbe moreeasilycontrolled.Fuelbreaksdividefire-proneareasinto smaller areas for easier fire control and to provide access for fire fighting. FUEL, HEAVY.Vegetationconsistingofroundwood3inches (76 mm) or larger in diameter. The amount of fuel (vegetation) wouldbe6tonsperacreorgreater. FUEL, LIGHT.Vegetationconsistingofherbaceousandround woodlessthan 1/4 inch(6.4mm)indiameter.Theamountoffuel (vegetation)wouldbe 1/2 tonto2tonsperacre. FUEL, MEDIUM.Vegetationconsistingofroundwood 1/4 to3 inches(6.4mmto76mm)indiameter. Theamountoffuel(vegeta- tion)wouldbe2to6tonsperacre. FUEL MODIFICATION.A method of modifying fuel load byreducingtheamountofnonfire-resistivevegetationoralter- ing the type of vegetation to reduce the fuel load. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 7 CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS 102_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\02_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:21:18 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen FUEL MOSAIC.Afuelmodificationsystemthatprovidesfor the creation of islands and irregular boundaries to reduce the visual and ecological impact of fuel modification. FUEL-LOADING.The oven-dry weight of fuels in a given area,usuallyexpressedinpounds peracre(lb/a)(kg/ha).Fuel loading may be referenced to fuel size or timelag categories, and may include surface fuels or total fuels. GREENBELT.A fuel break designated for a use other than fire protection. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.As defined in the Interna- tional Fire Code. HEAVY TIMBER CONSTRUCTION.As described in the International Building Code. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE (ISO).An agency that recommends fire insurance rates based on a grading schedule that incorporates evaluation of fire fighting resources and capabilities. LEGISLATIVE BODY.Thegoverningbodyofthepoliticalju- risdictionadministeringthiscode. LOG WALL CONSTRUCTION.A type of construction in which exterior walls are constructed of solid wood members and where the smallest horizontal dimension of each solid wood member is at least 6 inches (152 mm). MULTILAYERED GLAZED PANELS.Window or door assemblies that consist of two or more independently glazed panelsinstalledparalleltoeachother,havingasealedairgapin between, within a frame designed to fill completely the win- dow or door opening in which the assembly is intended to be installed. NONCOMBUSTIBLE.As applied to building construction materialmeansamaterialthat,intheforminwhichitisused,is either one of the following: 1. Materialofwhichnopartwilligniteandburnwhensub- jectedtofire.AnymaterialconformingtoASTME136 shallbeconsiderednoncombustiblewithinthemeaning of this section. 2. Materialhavingastructuralbaseofnoncombustiblema- terialasdefinedinItem1above,withasurfacingmate- rialnot over 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) thick,which has aflame- spread rating of 50 or less.Flame-spread rating asused herein refers to rating obtained according to tests con- ducted as specified in ASTM E 84. “Noncombustible” does not apply to surface finish materi- als.Materialrequiredtobenoncombustibleforreducedclear- ances to flues, heating appliances or other sources of high temperature shall refer to material conforming to Item 1. No material shall be classed as noncombustible that is subject to increase in combustibility or flame-spread rating, beyond the limits herein established, through the effects of age, moisture or other atmospheric condition. NONCOMBUSTIBLE ROOF COVERING.Oneofthefol- lowing: 1. Cement shingles or sheets. 2. Exposed concrete slab roof. 3. Ferrous or copper shingles or sheets. 4. Slate shingles. 5. Clay or concrete roofing tile. 6. Approved roof covering of noncombustible material. SLOPE.Thevariationofterrainfromthehorizontal;thenum- beroffeet(meters)riseorfallper100feet(30480mm)mea- sured horizontally, expressed as a percentage. STRUCTURE.That which is built or constructed, an edifice orbuildingofanykind,oranypieceofworkartificiallybuiltup or composed of parts joined together in some manner. TREE CROWN.Theprimaryandsecondarybranchesgrow- ing out from the main stem, together with twigs and foliage. UNENCLOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.An acces- sorystructurewithoutacompleteexteriorwallsystemenclos- ing the area under roof or floor above. WILDFIRE.An uncontrolled fire spreading through vegeta- tive fuels, exposing and possibly consuming structures. WILDLAND.An area in which development is essentially nonexistent,exceptforroads,railroads,powerlinesandsimilar facilities. WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE.The line, area or zone wherestructuresorotherhumandevelopment(includingcritical infrastructure that if destroyed would result in hardship to com- munities)meetorinterminglewithundevelopedwildlandorveg- etativefuel. DEFINITIONS 8 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 202_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\02_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:21:18 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 301 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA DESIGNATIONS 301.1 Declaration.The legislative body shall declare the wildland-urban interface areas within the jurisdiction. The urban-wildlandinterfaceareasshallbebasedonthemapscre- ated in accordance with Section 301. 301.2 Mapping.Incooperation,thecodeofficialandtheDivi- sion of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) wildfire repre- sentative (per participating agreement between county and FFSL) will create or review Wildland-Urban Interface Area maps,toberecordedandfiledwiththeclerkofthejurisdiction. These areas shall become effective immediately thereafter. 301.3 Review of wildland-urban interface areas.The code official and the FFSL wildfire representative shall reevaluate and recommend modification to the wildland-urban interface areasinaccordancewithSection301.1onathree-yearbasisor more frequently as deemed necessary by the legislative body. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 9 CHAPTER 3 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREAS 103_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\03_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:31:56 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 10 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 203_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\03_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:31:56 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION401 GENERAL 401.1 Scope.Wildland-urban interface areas shall be pro- vided with emergency vehicle access and water supply in ac- cordance with this chapter. 401.2 Objective.Theobjectiveofthischapteristoestablish the minimum requirements for emergency vehicle access and water supply for buildings and structures located in the wildland-urban interface areas. 401.3 General safety precautions.General safety precau- tionsshallbeinaccordancewiththischapter.SeealsoAppen- dix A. SECTION 402 APPLICABILITY 402.1 Subdivisions. 402.1.1 Access.New subdivisions, as determined by this jurisdiction, shall be provided with fire apparatus access roads in accordance with the International Fire Code and access requirements in accordance with Section 403. 402.1.2 Water supply.New subdivisions as determined by this jurisdiction shall be provided with water supply in accordance with Section 404. 402.2 Individual structures. 402.2.1 Access.Individual structures hereafter con- structedorrelocatedintoorwithinwildland-urbaninterface areasshallbeprovidedwithfireapparatusaccessinaccor- dancewiththe International Fire Code anddrivewaysinac- cordance with Section 403.2. Marking of fire protection equipment shall be provided in accordance with Section 403.5andaddressmarkersshallbeprovidedinaccordance with Section 403.6. 402.2.2 Water supply.Individual structures hereafter constructed or relocated into or within wildland-urban in- terfaceareasshallbeprovidedwithaconformingwatersup- ply in accordance with Section 404. Exceptions: 1. Structures constructed to meet the requirements for the class of ignition-resistant construction specifiedinTable503.1foranonconformingwa- ter supply. 2. Buildings containing only private garages, car- ports, sheds and agricultural buildings with a floor area of not more than 600 square feet (56 m2). SECTION 403 ACCESS 403.1 Restrictedaccess.Whereemergencyvehicleaccessis restricted because of secured access roads or driveways or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or fire- fighting purposes, the code official is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessiblelocation. The key box shallbeof atypeapprovedby thecode officialand shallcon- tainkeystogainnecessaryaccessasrequiredbythecodeoffi- cial. 403.2 Driveways.Driveways shall be provided when any portionofanexteriorwallofthefirststoryofabuildingislo- catedmorethan150feet(45720mm)fromafireapparatusac- cess road. Driveways shall provide a minimum unobstructed width of 12 feet (3658 mm) and a minimum unobstructed heightof 13 feet6inches(4115 mm). Drivewaysinexcessof 150 feet (45 720 mm) in length shall be provided with turn- arounds. Driveways in excess of 200 feet (60 960 mm) in length and less than 20 feet (6096 mm) in width shall be pro- vided with turnouts in addition to turnarounds. Adrivewayshallnotserveinexcessoffivedwellingunits. Drivewayturnarounds shallhaveinsideturningradiiofnot lessthan30feet(9144mm)andoutsideturningradiiofnotless than45feet(13716mm).Drivewaysthatconnectwitharoad orroadsatmorethanonepointmaybeconsideredashavinga turnaround if all changes of direction meet the radii require- ments for driveway turnarounds. Driveway turnouts shall be an all-weather road surface at least 10 feet (3048 mm) wide and 30 feet (9144 mm) long. Drivewayturnoutsshallbelocatedasrequiredbythecodeoffi- cial. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges on driveways and private roads. Design loads for bridges shall be established by the code official. 403.3 Fire apparatus access road.When required, fire ap- paratus access roads shall be all-weather roads with a mini- mumwidthof20feet(6096mm)andaclearheightof13feet6 inches(4115mm);shallbedesignedtoaccommodatetheloads andturning radiifor fireapparatus;andhaveagradientnego- tiablebythespecificfireapparatusnormallyusedatthatloca- tion within the jurisdiction. Dead-end roads in excess of 150 feet(45720mm)inlengthshallbeprovidedwithturnarounds as approved by the code official. An all-weather road surface shallbeanysurfacematerialacceptabletothecodeofficialthat wouldnormallyallowthepassageofemergencyservicevehi- clestoprotectstructuresandwildlandswithin the jurisdiction. 403.4 Markingofroads.Approvedsignsorotherapproved noticesshallbeprovidedandmaintainedforaccessroadsand driveways to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 11 CHAPTER 4 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 104_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen All road identification signs and supports shall be of noncombustible materials.Signs shall have minimum 4-inch- high(102mm)reflectiveletterswith 1/2 inch(12.7mm)stroke on a contrasting 6-inch-high (152 mm) sign. Road identifica- tionsignageshallbemountedataheightof7feet(2134 mm) from the road surface to the bottom of the sign. 403.5 Marking of fire protection equipment.Fire protec- tionequipmentandfirehydrantsshallbeclearlyidentifiedina manner approved by the code official to prevent obstruction. 403.6 Address markers.All buildings shall have a perma- nentlypostedaddress,whichshallbeplacedateachdriveway entranceandbevisiblefrombothdirectionsoftravelalongthe road.Inallcases,theaddressshallbepostedatthebeginningof construction and shall be maintained thereafter, and the ad- dressshallbevisibleandlegiblefromtheroadonwhichthead- dress is located. Address signs along one-way roads shall be visible from boththeintendeddirectionoftravelandtheoppositedirection. Wheremultipleaddressesarerequiredatasingledriveway, they shall be mounted on a single post, and additional signs shall be posted at locations where driveways divide. Where a roadway provides access solely to a single com- mercialorindustrialbusiness,theaddresssignshallbeplaced at the nearest road intersection providing access to that site. 403.7 Grade.The gradient for fire apparatus access roads anddrivewaysshallnotexceedthemaximumapprovedbythe codeofficial.Itwillbeuptothecodeofficialtoascertainthestan- dardbasedonlocalfireequipmentgradenottoexceed12percent. SECTION404 WATER SUPPLY 404.1 General.When provided in order to qualify as a con- forming water supply for the purpose of Table 503.1, an ap- proved water source shall have an adequate water supply for the use of the fire protection service to protect buildings and structures from exterior fire sources or to suppress structure fires within the wildland-urban interface area of the jurisdic- tion in accordance with this section. 404.2 Water sources.The point at which a water source is availableforuseshallbelocatednotmorethan1,000feet(305 m)fromthebuildingandbeapprovedbythecodeofficial.The distanceshallbemeasuredalonganunobstructedlineoftravel. Water sources shall comply with the following: 1. Man-made water sources shall have a minimum usable watervolumeasdeterminedbytheadequatewatersup- plyneeds inaccordance withSection404.5. Thiswater sourceshallbeequippedwithanapprovedhydrant.The water level of the water source shall be maintained by rainfall, water pumped from a well, water hauled by a tanker,orbyseasonalhighwaterofastreamorriver.The design,construction,location,waterlevelmaintenance, access, and access maintenance of man-made water sources shall be approved by the code official. 2. Naturalwatersourcesshallhaveaminimumannualwa- ter level or flow sufficient to meet the adequate water supplyneedsinaccordancewithSection404.5.Thiswa- terlevelorflowshallnotberendered unusablebecause of freezing. This water source shall have an approved draftsitewithanapprovedhydrant.Adequatewaterflow andrightsforaccesstothewatersourceshallbeensured in a form acceptable to the code official. 404.3 Draft sites.Approved draft sites shall be provided at allnaturalwatersourcesintendedforuseasfireprotectionfor compliancewiththiscode.Thedesign,construction,location, accessandaccessmaintenanceofdraftsitesshallbeapproved by the code official. Thepumperaccesspointshallbeeitheranemergencyvehi- cle access area alongside a conforming access road or an ap- proveddrivewaynolongerthan150feet(45720mm).Pumper accesspointsandaccessdrivewaysshallbedesignedandcon- structedinaccordancewithallcodesandordinancesenforced bythisjurisdiction.Pumperaccesspointsshallnotrequirethe pumper apparatus to obstruct a road or driveway. 404.4 Hydrants.All hydrants shall be designed and con- structed in accordance with nationally recognized standards. Thelocationandaccessshallbeapprovedbythecodeofficial. 404.5 Adequatewatersupply.Adequatewatersupplyshall be determined for purposes of initial attack and flame front controlbythelocaljurisdiction.NFPA 1142maybeusedasaref- erence. 404.6 Fire department.The water system required by this code can only be considered conforming for purposes of deter- mining the level of ignition-resistant construction (see Table 503.1). 404.7 Obstructions.Accesstoallwatersourcesrequiredby this code shall be unobstructed at all times. The code official shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining immediate ac- cess to water source equipment, fire protection equipment or hydrants. 404.8 Identification.Watersources,draftsites,hydrantsand fireprotectionequipmentshallbeclearlyidentifiedinamanner approvedbythecodeofficialtoidentifylocationandtoprevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. 404.9 Testing and maintenance.Water sources, draft sites, hydrants and other fire protection equipment required by this code shall be subject to periodic tests as required by the code official.Codeofficialshallestablishaperiodictestingschedule. Costsaretobecoveredbythewaterprovider.Allsuchequipment installedundertheprovisionsofthiscodeshallbemaintained inanoperativeconditionatalltimesandshallberepairedorre- placedwheredefective.Additions,repairs,alterationsandser- vicingofsuchfireprotectionequipmentandresourcesshallbe in accordance with approved standards. Mains and appurte- nancesshallbeinstalledinaccordancewithNFPA24.Watertanks for private fire protection shall be installed in accordance with NFPA22.Thecostsaretobecoveredbythewaterprovider. 404.10 Reliability. 404.10.1 Objective.Theobjectiveofthissectionistoin- creasethereliabilityofwatersuppliesbyreducingtheexpo- sure of vegetative fuels to electrically powered systems. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 12 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 204_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 404.10.2 Clearance of fuel.Defensible space shall be providedaroundwatertankstructures,watersupplypumps and pump houses in accordance with Section 603. 404.10.3 Standby power.Stationary water supply facili- ties within the wildland-urban interface area dependent on electricalpowersuppliedbypowergridtomeetadequatewa- tersupplydemandsshallprovidefunctionalstandbypower systemsinaccordance withtheICC Electrical Code toen- sure that an uninterrupted water supply is maintained. The standby power source shall be capable of providing power for a minimum of two hours. Exceptions:When approved by the code official, a standby power supply is not required where the primary powerservicetothestationarywatersupplyfacilityisun- dergroundorthereisanon-sitegenerator. SECTION405 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 405.1Purpose.Theplanistoprovideabasistodetermineoverall compliancewiththiscode,fordeterminationofIgnitionResistant Construction (IRC) (see Table 503.1) and for determining the needforalternativematerialsandmethods. 405.2 General.Whenrequiredbythecodeofficial,afirepro- tection plan shall be prepared and approved prior to the first buildingpermitissuanceorsubdivisionapproval. 405.3 Content.The plan shall be based upon a site-specific wildfire risk assessment that includes considerations of loca- tion, topography, aspect, flammable vegetation, climatic con- ditions and fire history. The plan shall address water supply, access,buildingignitionandfire-resistancefactors,fireprotec- tion systems and equipment, defensible space and vegetation management. 405.4 Cost.The cost of fire protection plan preparation and review shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 405.5 Plan retention.The fire protection plan shall be re- tained by the code official. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 13 304_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 14 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 404_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 501 GENERAL 501.1 Scope.Buildings and structures shall be constructed in accordancewiththe InternationalBuildingCode andthiscode. Exceptions: 1. Accessory structures not exceeding 120 square feet (11m2)infloorareawhenlocatedatleast50feet(15 240mm)frombuildingscontaininghabitablespaces. 2. Agricultural buildings at least 50 feet (15 240 mm) from buildings containing habitable spaces. 501.2 Objective.The objective of this chapter is to establish minimum standards to locate, design and construct buildings andstructuresorportionsthereoffortheprotectionoflifeand property,toresistdamagefromwildfires,andtomitigatebuild- ing and structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. The minimumstandardssetforthinthischaptervarywiththecriti- cal fire weather, slope and fuel type to provide increased pro- tection, above the requirements set forth in the International Building Code, from the various levels of hazards. SECTION 502 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY Thefirehazardseverityofbuildingsitesforallbuildingshere- after constructed, modified or relocated into wildland-urban interfaceareasshallbeestablishedinaccordancewithAppen- dix C. Thefirehazard severityisallowedtobereduced by imple- mentingavegetationmanagementplaninaccordancewithAp- pendix B. SECTION 503 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 503.1 General.Buildingsandstructureshereafterconstructed, modified or relocated into or within wildland-urban interface areas shall meet the construction requirements in accordance withTable503.1.Class1,Class2orClass3ignition-resistant constructionshallbeinaccordancewithSections504,505and 506, respectively. SECTION 504 CLASS 1 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 504.1 General.Class1ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 504. 504.2 Roof covering.RoofsshallhaveaClassAroofcovering oraClassAroofassembly.Forroofcoveringswherethepro- fileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdecking, thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtoprecludeentry of flames or embers. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 15 CHAPTER 5 SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS TABLE 503.1 IGNITION-RESISTANTCONSTRUCTIONa DEFENSIBLE SPACEc FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY Moderate Hazard High Hazard Extreme Hazard Water Supplyb Water Supplyb Water Supplyb Conformingd Nonconforminge Conformingd Nonconforminge Conformingd Nonconforminge Nonconforming IR 2 IR 1 IR 1 IR 1 N.C. IR 1 N.C.Not Permitted Conforming IR 3 IR 2 IR 2 IR 1 IR 1 IR 1 N.C. 1.5 x Conforming Not Required IR 3 IR 3 IR 2 IR 2 IR 1 a. Access shall be in accordance with Section 402. b. Subdivisions shall have a conforming water supply in accordance with Section 402.1. IR 1 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 504. IR 2 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 505. IR 3 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 506. N.C. = Exteriorwallsshallhaveafire-resistanceratingofnotlessthan1-hourandtheexteriorsurfacesofsuchwallsshallbenoncombustible.Usageoflogwall construction is allowed. c. Conformance based on Section 603. d.Conformance based on Section 404. e. AnonconformingwatersupplyisanywatersystemorsourcethatdoesnotcomplywithSection404,includingsituationswherethereisnowatersupplyforstruc- ture protection or fire suppression. 105_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 504.3 Protection of eaves.Eavesandsoffitsshallbeprotected on the exposed underside by materials approved for a mini- mum of 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction. Fascias are required and must be protected on the backside by materials approved for a minimum of 1-hour fire-resistance-rated con- struction or 2-inch (51 mm) nominal dimension lumber. 504.4 Gutters and downspouts.Gutters and downspouts shall be constructed of noncombustible material. 504.5 Exterior walls.Exteriorwallsofbuildingsorstructures shallbeconstructedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof 1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstructionontheexteriorsideor constructed with approved noncombustible materials. Exception:Heavy timber or log wall construction. Suchmaterialshallextendfromthetopofthefoundationto the underside of the roof sheathing. 504.6 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with exterior walls in accordance with Section 504.5. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 504.7 Appendages and projections.Unenclosed accessory structuresattachedtobuildingswithhabitablespacesandpro- jections,suchasdecks,shallbeaminimumof1-hour fire-re- sistance-rated construction, heavy timber construction or constructed of approved noncombustible materials. When the attached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin 6inches(152mm)oftheground, withexteriorwallconstruc- tion in accordance with Section 504.5. 504.8 Exterior glazing.Exteriorwindows,windowwallsand glazed doors, windows within exterior doors, and skylights shall be tempered glass, multilayered glazed panels, glass block or have a fire protection rating of not less than 20 min- utes. 504.9 Exterior doors.Exterior doors shall be approved noncombustibleconstruction,solidcorewoodnotlessthan13/4 inchesthick(45mm),orhaveafireprotectionratingofnotless than20minutes.Windowswithindoorsandglazeddoorsshall be in accordance with Section 504.8. Exception:Vehicle access doors. 504.10 Vents.Atticventilationopenings,foundationorunder- floor vents, or other ventilation openings in vertical exterior walls and vents through roofs shall not exceed 144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustiblecorrosion-resistantmeshwithopeningsnotto exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). Attic ventilation openings shall not be located in soffits, in eaveoverhangs,betweenraftersateaves,orinotheroverhang areas.Gableend and dormer ventsshallbelocatedatleast10 feet (3048 mm) from property lines. Underfloor ventilation openings shall be located as close to grade as practical. 504.11 Detached accessory structures.Detached accessory structureslocatedlessthan50feet(15240mm)fromabuild- ing containing habitable space shall have exterior walls con- structedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof1-hourfire- resistance-ratedconstruction,heavytimber,logwallconstruc- tionorconstructedwithapprovednoncombustiblematerialson the exterior side. When the detached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 504.5 or underfloor protection in accordance with Section 504.6. Exception:Theenclosuremaybeomittedwheretheunder- side of all exposed floors and all exposed structural col- umns,beamsandsupportingwallsareprotectedasrequired for exterior 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction or heavy-timber construction. See Section 504.2 for roof requirements. SECTION 505 CLASS 2 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 505.1 General.Class2ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 505. 505.2 Roof covering.Roofs shallhaveatleastaClassA roof covering, Class B roof assembly or an approved noncombustible roof covering. For roof coverings where the profileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdeck- ing,thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtopreclude entry of flames or embers. 505.3 Protection of eaves.Combustibleeaves,fasciasandsof- fits shall be enclosed with solid materials with a minimum thickness of 3/4 inch (19 mm). No exposed rafter tailsshall be permitted unless constructed of heavy timber materials. 505.4 Gutters and downspouts.Guttersanddownspoutsshall be constructed of noncombustible material. 505.5 Exterior walls.Exteriorwallsofbuildingsorstructures shallbeconstructedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof 1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstructionontheexteriorsideor constructed with approved noncombustible materials. Exception:Heavy timber or log wall construction. Suchmaterialshallextendfromthetopofthefoundationto the underside of the roof sheathing. 505.6 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground, with exterior walls in accordance with Section 505.5. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 505.7 Appendages and projections.Unenclosed accessory structuresattachedtobuildingswithhabitablespacesandpro- jections, such as decks, shall be a minimum of 1-hour fire-re- SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 16 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 205_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen sistance-rated construction, heavy timber construction or constructed with approved noncombustible materials. When the attached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 505.5. 505.8 Exterior glazing.Exteriorwindows,windowwallsand glazed doors, windows within exterior doors, and skylights shall be tempered glass, multilayered glazed panels, glass block or have a fire-protection rating of not less than 20 min- utes. 505.9 Exterior doors.Exterior doors shall be approved noncombustible construction, solid core wood not less than 13/4-inchesthick(45mm),orhaveafireprotectionratingofnot lessthan20minutes.Windowswithindoorsandglazeddoors shall be in accordance with Section 505.8. Exception:Vehicle access doors. 505.10 Vents.Atticventilationopenings,foundationorunder- floor vents or other ventilation openings in vertical exterior walls and vents through roofs shall not exceed 144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustiblecorrosion-resistantmeshwithopeningsnotto exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). Attic ventilation openings shall not be located in soffits, in eaveoverhangs,betweenraftersateaves,orinotheroverhang areas. Gable end and dormer vents shallbe locatedatleast10 feet (3048 mm) from property lines. Underfloor ventilation openings shall be located as close to grade as practical. 505.11 Detached accessory structures.Detached accessory structureslocatedlessthan50feet(15240mm)fromabuild- ing containing habitable space shall have exterior walls con- structedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof1-hourfire- resistance-ratedconstruction,heavytimber,logwallconstruc- tion,orconstructedwithapprovednoncombustiblematerialon the exterior side. When the detached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 505.5 or underfloor protection in accordance with Section 505.6. Exception:Theenclosuremaybeomittedwheretheunder- side of all exposed floors and all exposed structural col- umns,beamsandsupportingwallsareprotectedasrequired for exterior 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction or heavy-timber construction. See Section 505.2 for roof requirements. SECTION 506 CLASS 3 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 506.1 General.Class3ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 506. 506.2 Roof covering.Roofs shallhaveatleastaClassAroof covering, Class C roof assembly or an approved noncombustible roof covering. For roof coverings where the profileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdeck- ing,thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtopreclude entry of flames or embers. 506.3 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with exterior walls. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 506.4 Vents.Attic ventilation openings, soffit vents, founda- tionorunderfloor ventsorotherventilationopenings inverti- calexteriorwallsandventsthroughroofsshallnotexceed144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustible corrosion-resistant mesh with openings not to exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). SECTION 507 REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF ROOF COVERINGS Theroofcoveringonbuildingsorstructuresinexistenceprior totheadoptionofthiscodethatarereplacedorhave25percent ormorereplacedina12-monthperiodshallbereplacedwitha roofcoveringrequiredfornewconstructionbasedonthetype ofignition-resistantconstructionspecifiedinaccordancewith Section 503. SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 17 305_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:29 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 18 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 405_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:29 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 601 GENERAL 601.1 Scope.The provisions of this chapter establish general requirements for new and existing buildings, structures and premises located within wildland-urban interface areas. 601.2 Objective.The objective of this chapter is to establish minimumrequirementstomitigatetherisktolifeandproperty from wildland fire exposures, exposures from adjacent struc- turesandtomitigatestructurefiresfromspreadingtowildland fuels. SECTION 602 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS DELETED SECTION 603 DEFENSIBLE SPACE 603.1 Objective.Provisions of this section are intended to modify the fuel load in areas adjacent to structures to createa defensible space. 603.2 Fuel modification.In order to qualify as a conforming defensiblespaceforindividualbuildingsorstructuresonaprop- erty,fuelmodificationshallbeprovidedwithinadistancefrom buildingsorstructuresasspecifiedinTable603.2.Forallother purposes, the fuel modification distance shall not be less than 30 feet (9144 mm) or to the property line, whichever is less. DistancesspecifiedinTable603.2shallbemeasuredonahori- zontalplanefromtheperimeterorprojectionofthebuildingor structureasshown inFigure 603.2. DistancesspecifiedinTa- ble 603.2 may be modified by the code official because of a site-specificanalysisbasedonlocalconditionsandthefirepro- tection plan. Personsowning,leasing,controlling,operatingormaintain- ing buildings or structures requiring defensible spaces are re- sponsible for modifying or removing nonfire-resistive vegetationonthepropertyowned,leasedorcontrolledbysaid person. Treesareallowedwithinthedefensiblespace,providedthe horizontaldistancebetweencrownsofadjacenttreesandover- headelectricalfacilitiesorunmodifiedfuelisnotlessthan10 feet (3048 mm). Deadwood and litter shall be regularly re- moved from trees. Where ornamental vegetative fuels or cultivated ground cover,suchasgreengrass,ivy,succulentsorsimilarplantsare usedasground cover,theyareallowedtobewithinthedesig- nated defensible space, provided they do not form ameans of transmitting fire from the native growth to any structure. TABLE 603.2 REQUIRED DEFENSIBLE SPACE WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA FUEL MODIFICATION DISTANCE (feet) Moderate hazard 30 High hazard 50 Extreme hazard 100 For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. 603.3 Community fuel modification zones.Fuel modification zones to protect new communities shall be provided when re- quiredbythecodeofficialinaccordancewithSection603,inor- dertoreducefuelloadsadjacenttocommunitiesandstructures. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 19 CHAPTER 6 FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FIGURE 603.2 MEASUREMENTS OF FUEL MODIFICATION DISTANCE 106_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\06_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:42:52 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 603.3.1 Land ownership.Fuelmodificationzonelandusedto protectacommunityshallbeunderthecontrolofanassocia- tionorothercommonownershipinstrumentforthelifeofthe communitytobeprotected. 603.3.2 Fuel modification zone plans.Fuel modification zoneplansshallbeapproved prior to fuelmodification work andshallbeplacedonasitegradingplanshowninplanview. Anelevationplanshallalsobeprovidedtoindicatethelength ofthefuelmodificationzoneontheslope.Fuelmodification zoneplansshallinclude,butnotbelimitedtothefollowing: 1. Plan showing existing vegetation. 2. Photographs showing natural conditions prior to work being performed. 3. Gradingplanshowinglocationofproposedbuildings and structures, and set backs from top of slope to all buildingsorstructures. SECTION 604 MAINTENANCE OF DEFENSIBLE SPACE 604.1 General.Defensible spaces required by Section 603 shall be maintained annually, or as necessary in accordance with Section 604. 604.2 Modified area.Nonfire-resistive vegetation or growth shall be kept clear of buildings or structures, in accordance withSection603,insuchamannerastoprovideaclearareafor fire suppression operations. 604.3 Responsibility.Persons owning, leasing, controlling, operating or maintaining buildings or structures are responsi- ble for maintenance of defensible spaces. Maintenance of the defensiblespaceshallincludemodifyingorremovingnonfire- resistivevegetationandkeepingleaves,needlesandotherdead vegetativematerialregularlyremovedfromroofsofbuildings and structures. 604.4 Trees.Individual trees and/or small clumps of trees or brush crowns, extending to within 10 feet (3048 mm) of any structure, shall be pruned to maintain a minimum horizontal clearanceof10feet(3048mm).Treecrownswithinthedefen- siblespaceshallbeprunedtoremovelimbslocatedlessthan6 feet(1829mm)abovethegroundsurfaceadjacenttothetrees. Portions of tree crowns that extend within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the outlet of a chimney shall be pruned to maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10 feet (3048 mm). Deadwoodandlittershallberegularlyremovedfromtrees. SECTION 605 SPARK ARRESTERS Chimneysservingfireplaces,barbecues,incineratorsordeco- rative heating appliances in which solid or liquid fuel isused, shallbeprovidedwithasparkarrester.Sparkarrestersshallbe constructed of woven or welded wire screening of 12 USA standard gage wire (0.1046 inch) (2.66 mm) having openings not exceeding 1/2 inch (12.7 mm). Thenetfreeareaofthespark arrestershallnotbelessthan four times the net free area of the outlet of the chimney. SECTION 606 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS INSTALLATIONS 606.1 General.ThestorageofLP-gasandtheinstallationand maintenance of pertinent equipment shall be in accordance withthe InternationalFireCode or,intheabsencethereof,rec- ognized standards. 606.2 Location of containers.LP-gas containers shall be lo- cated within the defensible space in accordance with the Interational Fire Code. SECTION 607 STORAGE OF FIREWOOD AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS Firewoodandcombustiblematerialshallnotbestoredinunen- closed spaces beneath buildings or structures, or on decks or undereaves,canopiesorotherprojectionsoroverhangs.When requiredbythecodeofficial,storageoffirewoodandcombus- tible material stored in the defensible space shall be located a minimumof30feet(9144mm)fromstructuresandseparated fromthecrownoftreesbyaminimumhorizontaldistanceof15 feet (4572 mm). Firewoodandcombustiblematerialsnotforconsumptionon thepremisesshallbestoredsoastonotposeahazard.SeeAp- pendix A. FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 20 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 206_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\06_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:42:52 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION A101 GENERAL A101.1 Scope.Theprovisionsofthisappendix establishgen- eralrequirementsapplicabletonewandexistingpropertieslo- cated within urban-wildland interface areas. A101.2Objective.Theobjectiveofthisappendixistoprovide necessaryfire-protectionmeasurestoreducethethreatofwild- fireinanurban-wildlandinterfaceareaandimprovethecapa- bility of controlling such fires. SECTION A102 VEGETATION CONTROL A102.1 General.Vegetation control shall comply with this section. A102.2Clearanceofbrushorvegetativegrowthfromroad- ways.Thecodeofficialisauthorizedtorequireareaswithin10 feet(3048mm)oneachsideofportionsoffireapparatusaccess roads and driveways to be cleared of nonfire-resistive vegeta- tion growth. Exception:Single specimens of trees, ornamental vegeta- tive fuels or cultivated ground cover, such as green grass, ivy,succulentsor similarplantsused asground cover,pro- videdtheydonotformameansofreadilytransmittingfire. A102.3 Clearance of brush and vegetative growth from electrical transmission and distribution lines. A102.3.1 General.Clearance of brush and vegetative growth from electrical transmission and distribution lines shall be in accordance with Section A102.3. Exception:Section A102.3 does not authorize persons nothavinglegalrightofentrytoenteronordamagethe property of others without consent of the owner. A102.3.2Supportclearance.Personsowning,controlling, operatingormaintainingelectricaltransmissionordistribu- tionlinesshallhaveanapprovedprograminplacethatiden- tifies poles or towers with equipment and hardware types thathaveahistoryofbecominganignitionsource,andpro- videsacombustiblefreespaceconsistingofaclearingofnot lessthan10feet(3048mm)ineachdirectionfromtheouter circumferenceofsuchpoleortowerduringsuchperiodsof time as designated by the code official. Exception:Lines used exclusively as telephone, tele- graph,messengercall,alarmtransmissionorotherlines classed as communication circuits by a public utility. A102.3.3 Electrical distribution and transmission line clearances. A102.3.3.1 General.Clearances between vegetation and electrical lines shall be in accordance with Section A102.3.3. A102.3.3.2 Trimming clearance.At the time of trim- ming,clearancesnotlessthanthoseestablishedbyTable A102.3.3.2 shall be provided. The radial clearances shown below are minimum clearances that shall be es- tablished, at time of trimming, between the vegetation and the energized conductors and associated live parts. TABLE A102.3.3.2 MINIMUM CLEARANCES BETWEEN VEGETATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES AT TIME OF TRIMMING LINE VOLTAGE MINIMUM RADIAL CLEARANCE FROM CONDUCTOR (feet) 2,400-72,000 4 72,001-110,000 6 110,001-300,000 10 300,001 or more 15 For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. Exception:The code official is authorized to estab- lish minimum clearances different than those speci- fied by Table A102.3.3.2 when evidence substantiating such other clearances is submitted to and approved by the code official. A102.3.3.3 Minimum clearance to be maintained. Clearances not less than those established by Table A102.3.3.3 shall be maintained during such periods of timeasdesignatedbythecodeofficial.Thesite-specific clearanceachieved, attimeof pruning, shallvary based on species growth rates, the utility company-specific trim cycle, the potential line sway due to wind, line sag due to electrical loading and ambient temperature and thetree’slocationinproximitytothehighvoltagelines. Exception:The code official is authorized to estab- lish minimum clearances different than those speci- fied by Table A102.3.3.3 when evidence substantiating such other clearances is submitted to and approved by the code official. TABLE A102.3.3.3 MINIMUM CLEARANCES BETWEEN VEGETATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES TO BE MAINTAINED LINE VOLTAGE MINIMUM CLEARANCE (inches) 750-35,000 6 35,001-60,000 12 60,001-115,000 19 115,001-230,000 30.5 230,001-500,000 115 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. A102.3.3.4Electricalpowerlineemergencies.During emergencies,theutilityshallperformtherequiredwork totheextentnecessarytoclearthehazard.Anemergency 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 21 APPENDIX A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS(optional) 107_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:23 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen can include situations such as trees falling into power lines, or trees in violation of Table A102.3.3.3. A102.4 Correction of condition.The code official is autho- rizedtogivenoticetotheownerofthepropertyonwhichcon- ditions regulated by Section A102 exist to correct such conditions. If the owner fails to correct such conditions, the legislative body of the jurisdiction is authorized to cause the sametobedoneandmaketheexpenseofsuchcorrectionalien on the property where such condition exists. SECTION A103 ACCESS RESTRICTIONS A103.1Restrictedentrytopubliclands.Thecodeofficialis authorized to determine and publicly announce when urban- wildlandinterfaceareasshallbeclosedtoentryandwhensuch areasshallagainbeopenedtoentry.Entryonandoccupationof urban-wildlandinterfaceareas,exceptpublicroadways,inhab- itedareasorestablishedtrailsandcampsitesthathavenotbeen closed during such time when the urban-wildland interface area is closed to entry, is prohibited. Exceptions: 1. Residents and owners of private property within ur- ban-wildland interface areas and their invitees and guests going to or being on their lands. 2. Entry, in the course of duty, by peace or police offi- cers,andotherdulyauthorizedpublicofficers,mem- bers of a fire department and members of the Wildland Firefighting Service. A103.2 Trespassing on posted private property. A103.2.1General.Whenthecodeofficialdeterminesthata specific area within an urban-wildland interface area pres- ents an exceptional and continuing fire danger because of thedensityofnaturalgrowth,difficultyofterrain,proximity to structures or accessibility to the public, such areas shall berestrictedorcloseduntilchangedconditionswarrantter- minationof such restrictionor closure. Such areasshallbe posted in accordance with Section A103.2.2. A103.2.2Signs.Approvedsignsprohibitingentrybyunau- thorizedpersonsandreferringtothiscodeshallbeplacedon every closed area. A103.2.3 Trespassing.Entering and remaining within ar- eas closed and posted is prohibited. Exception:Owners and occupiers of private or public property within closed and posted areas; their guests or invitees; authorized persons engaged in the operation andmaintenanceofnecessaryutilitiessuchaselectrical power, gas, telephone, water and sewer; and local, state and federal public officers and their authorized agents acting in the course of duty. A103.3Useoffireroadsanddefensiblespace.Motorcycles, motorscootersandmotorvehiclesshallnotbedrivenorparked on, and trespassing is prohibited on, fire roads or defensible space beyond the point where travel is restricted by a cable, gate or sign, without the permission of the property owners. Vehiclesshallnotbeparkedinamannerthatobstructstheen- trance to a fire road or defensible space. Exception:Publicofficersactingwithintheirscopeofduty. Radioandtelevisionaerials,guywiresthereto,andotherob- structions shall not be installed or maintained on fire roads or defensible spaces, unless located 16 feet (4877 mm) or more above such fire road or defensible space. A103.4 Use of motorcycles, motor scooters, ultralight air- craft and motor vehicles.Motorcycles, motor scooters, ultralight aircraft and motor vehicles shall not be operated withinurban-wildlandinterfaceareas,withoutapermitbythe code official, except on clearly established public or private roads. Permission from the property owner shallbe presented when requesting a permit. A103.5 Tampering with locks, barricades, signs and ad- dressmarkers.Locks,barricades,seals,cables,signsandad- dress markersinstalledwithinurban-wildland interfaceareas, by or under the control of the code official, shall not be tam- pered with, mutilated, destroyed or removed. Gates, doors, barriers and locks installed by or under the control of the code official shall not be unlocked. SECTION A104 IGNITION SOURCE CONTROL A104.1General.Ignitionsourcesshallbeinaccordancewith Section A104. A104.2 Objective.Regulations in this section are intended to provide the minimum requirements to prevent the occurrence of wildfires. A104.3Clearancefromignitionsources.Clearancebetween ignitionsourcesandgrass,brushorothercombustiblemateri- als shall be maintained a minimum of 30 feet (9144 mm). A104.4 Smoking.When required by the code official, signs shallbepostedstatingNOSMOKING.Nopersonshallsmoke within15feet(4572mm)ofcombustiblematerialsornonfire- resistive vegetation. Exception:Placesofhabitationorintheboundaries ofes- tablished smoking areas or campsites as designated by the code official. A104.5 Equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames.Equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames capable of igniting nearby combustibles shall notbeusedinurban-wildlandinterfaceareaswithoutapermit from the code official. Exception:Use of approved equipment in habitated pre- misesordesignatedcampsitesthatareaminimumof30feet (9144mm)fromgrass-,grain-,brush-orforest-coveredar- eas. A104.6Fireworks.Fireworksshallnotbeusedorpossessedin urban-wildland interface areas. Exception:Fireworks allowed by the code official under permitinaccordancewiththe InternationalFireCode when notprohibitedbyapplicablelocalorstatelaws,ordinances and regulations. The code official is authorized to seize, take, remove or cause to be removed fireworks in violation of this section. APPENDIX A 22 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 207_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen A104.7 Outdoor fires. A104.7.1General.Nopersonshallbuild,igniteormaintain anyoutdoorfireofanykindforanypurposeinoronanyur- ban-wildland interface area, except by the authority of a written permit from the code official. Exception:Outdoor fires within inhabited premises or designatedcampsiteswheresuchfiresareinapermanent barbecue,portablebarbecue,outdoorfireplace,incinera- tororgrillandareaminimumof30feet(9144mm)from anycombustiblematerialornonfire-resistivevegetation. A104.7.2Permits.Permitsshallincorporatesuchtermsand conditionsthatwillreasonablysafeguardpublicsafetyand property. Outdoor fires shall not be built, ignited or main- tainedinoronhazardousfireareasunderthefollowingcon- ditions: 1. When high winds are blowing, 2. Whenaperson17yearsoldoroverisnotpresentatall times to watch and tend such fire, or 3. Whenapublicannouncementismadethatopenburn- ing is prohibited. A104.7.3 Restrictions.No person shall use a permanent barbecue, portable barbecue, outdoor fireplace or grill for thedisposalofrubbish,trashorcombustiblewastematerial. A104.8Incinerators,outdoorfireplaces,permanentbarbe- cues and grills.Incinerators, outdoor fireplaces, permanent barbecues and grillsshallnot be built,installedor maintained inurban-wildlandinterfaceareaswithoutapprovalofthecode official. Incinerators, outdoor fireplaces, permanent barbecues and grillsshallbemaintainedingoodrepairandinasafecondition atalltimes.Openingsinsuchappliancesshallbeprovidedwith an approved spark arrestor, screen or door. Exception:When approved by the code official, unpro- tectedopeningsinbarbecuesandgrillsnecessaryforproper functioning. A104.9 Reckless behavior.The code official is authorized to stopanyactionsofapersonorpersonsiftheofficialdetermines thattheactionisrecklessandcouldresultinanignitionoffire or spread of fire. A104.10 Planting vegetation under or adjacent to ener- gizedelectricallines.Novegetationshallbeplantedunderor adjacent to energized power lines that, at maturity, shall grow within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the energized conductors. SECTION A105 CONTROL OF STORAGE A105.1 General.In addition to therequirements of the Inter- nationalFireCode,storageanduseofthematerialsshallbein accordance with Section A105. A105.2Hazardousmaterials.Hazardousmaterialsinexcess of10gallons(37.8L)ofliquid,200cubicfeet(5.66m3)ofgas, or10pounds(4.54kg)ofsolidsrequireapermitandshallcom- ply with nationally recognized standards for storage and use. A105.3 Explosives.Explosives shall not be possessed, kept, stored, sold, offered for sale, given away, used, discharged, transportedordisposedofwithinurban-wildlandinterfacear- eas, except by permit from the code official. A105.4 Combustible materials. A105.4.1General.Outsidestorageofcombustiblemateri- als such as, but not limitedto, wood, rubber tires, building materialsorpaperproductsshallcomplywiththeotherap- plicable sections of this code and this section. A105.4.2Individualpiles.Individualpilesshallnotexceed 5,000 square feet (465 m2) of contiguous area. Piles shall notexceed50,000cubicfeet(1416m3)involumeor10feet (3048 mm) in height. A105.4.3 Separation.A clear space of at least 40 feet (12 192 mm) shall be provided between piles. The clear space shall not contain combustible material or nonfire-resistive vegetation. SECTION A106 DUMPING A106.1 Waste material.Waste material shall not be placed, deposited or dumped in urban-wildland interface areas, or in, on or along trails,roadwaysor highwaysor againststructures in urban-wildland interface areas. Exception:Approved public and approved private dump- ing areas. A106.2Ashesandcoals.Ashesandcoalsshallnotbeplaced, deposited or dumped in or on urban-wildland interface areas. Exceptions: 1. Inthehearthofanestablishedfirepit,campstoveor fireplace. 2. In a noncombustible container with a tightfitting lid, whichiskeptormaintainedinasafelocationnotless than10feet(3048mm)fromnonfire-resistivevegeta- tion or structures. 3. Where such ashes or coals are buried and covered with1foot(305mm)ofmineralearthnotlessthan25 feet (7620 mm) from nonfire-resistive vegetation or structures. SECTION A107 PROTECTION OF PUMPS AND WATER STORAGE FACILITIES A107.1General.Thereliabilityofthewatersupplyshallbein accordance with Section A107. A107.2 Objective.Theintentofthissectionistoincreasethe reliability of water storage and pumping facilities and to pro- tect such systems against loss from intrusion by fire. A107.3 Fuel modification area.Water storage and pumping facilitiesshall be provided with a defensible space of not less than30feet(9144mm)clearofnonfire-resistivevegetationor growth around and adjacent to such facilities. Persons owning, controlling, operating or maintaining wa- ter storage and pumping systems requiring this defensible APPENDIX A 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 23 307_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen spaceareresponsibleforclearingandremovingnonfire-resis- tive vegetation and maintaining the defensible space on the property owned, leased or controlled by said person. A107.4 Trees.Portions of trees that extend to within 30 feet (9144 mm) of combustible portions of water storage and pumping facilities shall be removed. A107.5 Protection of electricalpower supplies.When elec- trical pumps are used to provide the required water supply, suchpumpsshallbeconnectedtoastandbypowersourcetoau- tomatically maintain electrical power in the event of power loss. The standby power source shall be capable of providing powerforaminimumoftwohoursinaccordancewiththeICC Electrical Code. Exception:A standby power source is not required where theprimarypowerservicetopumpsareundergroundasap- proved by the code official. SECTION A108 LAND USE LIMITATIONS A108.1 General.Temporary fairs, carnivals, public exhibi- tionsandsimilarusesmustcomplywithallotherprovisionsof this code in addition to enhanced ingress and egress require- ments. A108.2 Objective.The increased public use of land or struc- tures in urban-wildland interface areas also increases the po- tential threat to life safety. The provisions of this section are intended to reduce that threat. A108.3 Permits.Temporary fairs, carnivals, public exhibi- tionsorsimilarusesshallnotbeallowedinadesignatedurban- wildland interface area, except by permit from the code offi- cial. Permitsshallincorporatesuchtermsandconditionsthatwill reasonably safeguard public safety and property. A108.4 Access roadways.In addition to the requirements in Section 403, access roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (7315mm)wideandpostedNOPARKING.Twoaccessroad- ways shall be provided to serve the permitted use area. When required by the code official to facilitate emergency operations, approved emergency vehicleoperating areas shall be provided. APPENDIX A 24 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 407_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen APPENDIX B VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Vegetation management plans shall be submitted to the code officialforreviewandapprovalaspartoftheplansrequiredfor a permit. Vegetation management plans shall describe all ac- tionsthatwillbetakentopreventafirefrom beingcarriedto- ward or away from the building. A vegetation management plan shall include at least the following information: 1. A copy of the site plan. 2. Methodsandtimetablesfor controlling,changingormod- ifyingareasontheproperty.Elementsoftheplanshallin- clude removal of slash, snags, vegetation that may grow into overhead electrical lines, other ground fuels, ladder fuelsanddeadtrees,andthethinningoflivetrees. 3. Aplanformaintainingtheproposedfuel-reductionmea- sures. To be considered a fuel modification for purposes of this code, continuous maintenance of the clearance is required. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 25 Grasses Agropyron cristatum (Crested Wheatgrass) Agropyron smithii (Western Wheatgrass) Buchloe dactyloides (Buffalograss) Dactylis glomerata (Orchardgrass) Festuca cinerea and other species (Blue Fescue) Lolium species (Rye Grass) Poa pratensis (Kentucky Bluegrass) Poa secunda (Sandberg Bluegrass) HerbaceousPerennials Achillea clavennae (Silvery Yarrow) Achillea filipendulina (Fernleaf Yarrow) Achillea - other species & hybrids (Yarrow)* Aquilegia - species & hybrids (Columbine) Armeria maritime (Sea Pink, Sea Thrift) Artemisia stelleriana (Beach Wormwood, Dusty Miller) Artemisia - other species & hybrids (Various names)* Bergenia – species & hybrids (Bergenia) Centranthus rubber (Red Valerian, Jupiter’s Beard) Cerastium tomentosum (Snow-in-summer) Coreopsis auriculata var.Nana (Dwarf Mouse Ear Coreopsis) Coreopsis – other perennial species (Coreopsis) Delosperma nubigenum (Hardy Ice Plant) Dianthus plumarius & others (Pinks) Erigeron hybrids (Fleabane)* Gaillardia X grandiflora (Blanket Flower) Geranium cinereum (Hardy Geranium) Geranium sanguineum (Bloody Cranesbill, Bloodred Geranium) Geranium species (Geranium) Hemerocallis species (Daylily) Heuchera sanguinea (Coral Bells, Alum Root) Iberis sempervirens (Evergreen Candytuft) Iris species & hybrids (Iris) Kniphofia species & hybrids (Red-hot Poker) Lavandula species (Lavender) Leucanthemum X superbum (Shasta Daisy) Limonium latifolium (Sea-lavender, Statice) Linum species (Flax) Liriope spicata (Lily-turf) Lupinus species & hybrids (Lupine)* Medicago sativus (Alfalfa) Oenothera species (Primrose) Papaver species (Poppy) Penstemon species & hybrids (Penstemon) Perovskia atriplicifolia (Russian Sage, Azure Sage) Potentilla nepalensis (Nepal Cinquefoil) Potentilla tridentata (Wineleaf Cinquefoil) Potentilla verna (tabernaemontani)(Spring Cinquefoil; Creeping Potentilla) Potentilla – other non-shrubby species & hybrids (Cinquefoil, Potentilla)* Salvia species & hybrids (Salvia, Sage)* Sedum species (Stonecrop, Sedum) Sempervivum tectorum (Hen and Chicks) Stachys byzantina (Lamb’s Ear) Yucca filamentosa (Yucca) UTAHFIRE RESISTIVE SPECIES Adapted from “UtahForestFacts: FirewisePlants forUtahLandscapes” Utah State University Extension, 2002 continued 108_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_25.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\08_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:57:00 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen APPENDIX B 26 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE Shrubs and Woody Vines Atriplex species (Saltbush) Ceanothus americanus (New Jersey Tea) Ceanothus ovatus & others (Ceanothus) Cistus species (Rock-rose) Cotoneaster dammeri (Bearberry Cotoneaster) Cotoneaster horizontalis (Rockspray or Rock Cotoneaster) Cotoneaster – other compact species (Cotoneaster) Hedera helix (English Ivy) Lonicera species & hybrids (Honeysuckle) Mahonia repens (Creeping Oregon Grape) Parthenocissus quinquefolia (Virginia Creeper) Prunus besseyi (Sand Cherry) Purshia tridentata (Bitterbrush, Antelope Bitterbrush) Pyracantha species (Firethorn, Pyracantha) Rhamnus species (Buckthorn) Rhus trilobata (Skunkbush Sumac) Rhus – other species (Sumac) Ribes species (Currant, Gooseberry) Rosa rugosa & other hedge roses (Rugosa Rose) Shepherdia canadensis (Russet Buffaloberry) Syringa vulgare (Lilac) Vinca major (Large Periwinkle) Vinca minor (Dwarf Periwinkle, Common Periwinkle) Trees Acer species (Maple) Betula species (Birch) Cercis canadensis (Eastern Redbud) Populus tremuloides (Quaking Aspen) Populus – other species (Poplar, Cottonwood) Salix species (Willow) *Plantsorgroupsofplantsmarkedwithanasterisk(*)canbecomeweedyincertaincircumstances,andmayevenbenoxiousweedswithlegal restrictionsagainsttheirplantingandcultivation. CheckwithyourlocalExtensionofficeorStateDepartmentofAgricultureforinformation on noxious weeds in your area. Note:Some of the listed plants may not be considered “water-wise” or drought-tolerant for arid climates. 208_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_26.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\08_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:53:03 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen A. Subdivision Design Points 1. Ingress/Egress Twoormoreprimaryroads 1___ One road 10___ One-laneroadin,one-laneroadout 15___ 2. Width of Primary Road 20 feet or more 1___ Less than 20 feet 5___ 3. Accessibility Roadgrade5%orless 1___ Road grade 5-10%5___ Roadgradegreaterthan10%10___ 4. Secondary Road Terminus Loop roads, cul-de-sacs with an outside turning radiusof45feetorgreater 1___ Cul-de-sac turnaround 5___ Dead-endroads200feetorlessinlength 8___ Dead-endroadsgreaterthan200feetinlength 10___ 5. Street Signs Present but unapproved 3___ Not present 5___ B. Vegetation (IUWIC Definitions) 1. Fuel Types Surface Lawn/noncombustible 1___ Grass/shortbrush 5___ Scattereddead/downwoodymaterial 10___ Abundantdead/downwoodymaterial 15___ Overstory Deciduoustrees(excepttallbrush)3___ Mixeddeciduoustreesandtallbrush 10___ Clumped/scatteredconifersand/ortallbrush 15___ Contiguousconiferand/ortallbrush 20___ 2. Defensible Space 70%ormoreoflotscompleted 1___ 30%to70%oflotscompleted 10___ Lessthan30%oflotscompleted 20___ C. Topography Locatedonflat,baseofhill,orsetbackatcrestofhill 1___ Onslopewith0-20%grade 5___ Onslopewith21-30%grade 10___ Onslopewith31%gradeorgreater 15___ Atcrestofhillwithunmitigatedvegetationbelow 20___ D. Roofing Material ClassAFireRated 1___ ClassBFireRated 5___ ClassCFireRated 10___ Nonrated 20___ E. Fire Protection—Water Source 500GPMhydrantwithin1,000feet 1___ Hydrantfartherthan1,000feetordraftsite 5___ Watersource20min.orless,roundtrip 10___ Water source farther than 20 min., and 45min.orless,roundtrip 15___ Watersourcefartherthan45min.,roundtrip 20___ F. Siding and Decking Noncombustible siding/deck 1___ Combustiblesiding/nodeck 5___ Noncombustible siding/combustible deck 10___ Combustiblesidinganddeck 15___ G . Utilities (gas and/or electric) All underground utilities 1___ Oneunderground,oneaboveground 3___ All aboveground 5___ Total for Subdivision Moderate Hazard 50–75 High Hazard 76–100 Extreme Hazard 101+ 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 27 APPENDIX C FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM This appendix is to be used to determine the fire hazard severity. 109_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_27.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\09_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:49:26 AM Color profile: DisabledComposite Default screen 28 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE 209_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg28.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\09_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:57:15 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen INDEX A ACCESS Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402 Driveways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.2 Fire apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.2 Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.7 Individual structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.2 Marking of roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.4 Restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.1 Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.1 ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.4 ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS OR METHODS. . . .103.3 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS . . . . . .602 C CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108 CLASS 1 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504 Detached accessory structures . . . . . . . . .504.11 Exterior doors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.9 Exterior walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.5 Protection of eaves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.3 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.2 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.10 Windows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.8 CLASS 2 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505 Detached accessory structures . . . . . . . . .505.11 Exterior doors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.9 Exterior walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.5 Protection of eaves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.3 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.2 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.10 Windows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.8 CLASS 3 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506.2 Unenclosed underfloor protection . . . . . . . .506.3 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506.4 CONTROL OF STORAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A105 D DEFENSIBLE SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .603 Fuel modification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .603.2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .202 DUMPING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A106 F FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .502 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM . . . . . . .Appendix C G GENERAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A I IGNITION SOURCE CONTROL . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A104 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Authority to inspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.1.2 Citations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.4.4 Enforcements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.2 Reinspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.1.3 Right of entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.3 Unsafe conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.4.5 L LAND USE LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A108 LIABILITY OF THE CODE OFFICIAL . . . . . . . . .102.3 LPG INSTALLATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .606 M MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.6 MAINTENANCE OF DEFENSIBLE SPACE . . . . . .604 Modified area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.2 Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.3 Trees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.4 P PERMITS Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.4 Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.5 Expiration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.8 Issuance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.6 Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.2 Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.9 Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.10 Validity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.7 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 29 110_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_29.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\10_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:53:12 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Work exempt from permit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .106 Information on plans and specifications. . . .106.2 Vegetation management plans. . . . . . . . . . .106.4 POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CODE OFFICIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102.1 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103.1 PROTECTION OF PUMPS AND WATER STORAGE FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A107 R REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF ROOF COVERINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .507 RETROACTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.4 S SPARK ARRESTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .605 STORAGE OF FIREWOOD AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .607 T TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103.2 U URBAN-WILDLAND INTERFACE AREA DESIGNATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301 Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.1 Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.2 Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.3 V VEGETATION CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A102 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN . . . .Appendix B W WATER SUPPLY Adequate water supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.5 Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402 Draft sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.3 Hydrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.4 Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.8 Individual structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.2 Obstructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.7 Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.10 Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.1 Testing and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.9 Water sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.2 INDEX 30 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 210_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_30.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\10_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:52:41 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 1 Wildland Urban Interface Modifications 2025 GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Casey Snider Senate Sponsor: Michael K. McKell 2 3 LONG TITLE 4 General Description: 5 This bill addresses efforts to oversee wildfire risks associated with wildland urban interface 6 property. 7 Highlighted Provisions: 8 This bill: 9 ▸ defines terms; 10 ▸ requires counties to take certain actions related to wildland urban interface property, 11 including assessing a fee; 12 ▸ directs the fee to be retained by a county and deposited into the Wildland-urban Interface 13 Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund; 14 ▸ addresses insuring wildland urban interface property; 15 ▸ imposes notice requirements related to insuring wildland urban interface property; 16 ▸ requires counties and municipalities to adopt the wildland urban interface building code 17 standards; 18 ▸ permits the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands (division) to choose not to cover 19 costs of local governments under certain circumstances; 20 ▸ directs the division to establish a program for wildland urban interface coordinators to 21 evaluate, using a triage scale, high risk wildland urban interface property; 22 ▸ addresses actions related to evaluating the high risk wildland urban interface property; 23 ▸ provides for a database to be accessed by certain insurers related to evaluating high risk 24 wildland urban interface property; 25 ▸ authorizes rulemaking; 26 ▸ addresses liability; and 27 ▸ makes technical changes. H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 28 Money Appropriated in this Bill: 29 None 30 Other Special Clauses: 31 This bill provides a special effective date. 32 Utah Code Sections Affected: 33 AMENDS: 34 15A-5-203, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapters 21, 381 35 63G-7-201, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapters 34, 105, 259, 329, 452, and 36 456 37 65A-8-203, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 77 38 65A-8-215, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 77 39 ENACTS: 40 17-16-22, Utah Code Annotated 1953 41 31A-22-1310, Utah Code Annotated 1953 42 65A-8-401, Utah Code Annotated 1953 43 65A-8-402, Utah Code Annotated 1953 44 65A-8-403, Utah Code Annotated 1953 45 46 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: 47 Section 1. Section 15A-5-203 is amended to read: 48 15A-5-203 . Amendments and additions to IFC related to fire safety, building, 49 and site requirements. 50 (1) For IFC, Chapter 5, Fire Service Features: 51 (a) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 501.5, Access grade and fire flow, is added as 52 follows: "An authority having jurisdiction over a structure built in accordance with 53 the requirements of the International Residential Code as adopted in the State 54 Construction Code, may require an automatic fire sprinkler system for the structure 55 only by ordinance and only if any of the following conditions exist: 56 (i) the structure: 57 (A) is located in an urban-wildland interface area as provided in the Utah 58 Wildland Urban Interface Code adopted as a construction code under the State 59 Construction Code; and 60 (B) does not meet the requirements described in Utah Code, Subsection 65A-8-203 61 (4)[(a)] (f) and Utah Administrative Code, R652-122-1300, Minimum - 2 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 62 Standards for County Wildland Fire Ordinance; 63 (ii) the structure is in an area where a public water distribution system with fire 64 hydrants does not exist as required in Utah Administrative Code, R309-550-5, 65 Water Main Design; 66 (iii) the only fire apparatus access road has a grade greater than 10% for more than 67 500 continual feet; 68 (iv) the total floor area of all floor levels within the exterior walls of the dwelling unit 69 exceeds 10,000 square feet; or 70 (v) the total floor area of all floor levels within the exterior walls of the dwelling unit 71 is double the average of the total floor area of all floor levels of unsprinkled 72 homes in the subdivision that are no larger than 10,000 square feet. 73 (vi) Exception: A single family dwelling does not require a fire sprinkler system if 74 the dwelling: 75 (A) is located outside the wildland urban interface; 76 (B) is built in a one-lot subdivision; and 77 (C) has 50 feet of defensible space on all sides that limits the propensity of fire 78 spreading from the dwelling to another property." 79 (b) In IFC, Chapter 5, Section 506.1, Where Required, is deleted and rewritten as 80 follows: "Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of 81 secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or 82 fire-fighting purposes, the fire code official, after consultation with the building 83 owner, may require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box 84 shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the fire code official. For 85 each fire jurisdiction that has at least one building with a required key box, the fire 86 jurisdiction shall adopt an ordinance, resolution, or other operating rule or policy that 87 creates a process to ensure that each key to each key box is properly accounted for 88 and secure." 89 (c) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 507.1.1, Isolated one- and two-family dwellings, is 90 added as follows: "Fire flow may be reduced for an isolated one- and two-family 91 dwelling when the authority having jurisdiction over the dwelling determines that the 92 development of a full fire-flow requirement is impractical." 93 (d) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 507.1.2, Pre-existing subdivision lots, is added as follows: 94 "507.1.2 Pre-existing subdivision lots. 95 The requirements for a pre-existing subdivision lot shall not exceed the requirements - 3 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 96 described in Section 501.5." 97 (e) In IFC, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1, here required, a new exception is added: "3. One 98 interior and one detached accessory dwelling unit on a single residential lot." 99 (f) IFC, Chapter 5, Section 510.1, Emergency responder communication coverage in 100 new buildings, is amended by adding: "When required by the fire code official, 101 unless the new building is a public school as that term is defined in Section 102 53G-9-205.1 or a private school, then the fire code official shall require," at the 103 beginning of the first paragraph. 104 (2) For IFC, Chapter 6, Building Services and Systems: 105 (a) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 604.6.1, Elevator key location, is deleted and rewritten as 106 follows: "Firefighter service keys shall be kept in a "Supra-Stor-a-key" elevator key 107 box or similar box with corresponding key system that is adjacent to the elevator for 108 immediate use by the fire department. The key box shall contain one key for each 109 elevator, one key for lobby control, and any other keys necessary for emergency 110 service. The elevator key box shall be accessed using a 6049 numbered key." 111 (b) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 606.1, General, is amended as follows: On line three, after 112 the word "Code", add the words "and NFPA 96". 113 (c) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 607.2, a new exception 5 is added as follows: "5. A Type 1 114 hood is not required for a cooking appliance in a microenterprise home kitchen, as 115 that term is defined in Utah Code, Section 26B-7-401, for which the operator obtains 116 a permit in accordance with Section 26B-7-416." 117 (3) IFC, Chapter 7, Fire and Smoke Protection Features, Section 702.5, is deleted. 118 Section 2. Section 17-16-22 is enacted to read: 119 17-16-22 . Wildland urban interface evaluation and fees. 120 (1) As used in this section: 121 (a) "County officer" means the same as that term is defined in Section 17-16-21. 122 (b) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means the same as that term is defined 123 in Section 65A-8-401. 124 (c) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 125 65A-8-401. 126 (d) "Wildland urban interface coordinator" means the same as that term is defined in 127 Section 65A-8-401. 128 (2) If evaluation of high risk wildland urban interface property is assigned to a county under 129 Section 65A-8-402: - 4 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 130 (a) the county shall enter into a cooperative agreement with the Division of Forestry, 131 Fire, and State Lands, in accordance with Subsection 65A-8-203(2)(a), which 132 agreement shall address compliance with this Subsection (2) for evaluation and 133 classification of high risk wildland urban interface property; and 134 (b) a county officer shall require that a wildland urban interface coordinator representing 135 the county annually evaluate high risk wildland urban interface property within the 136 county in accordance with Section 65A-8-402. 137 (3) Beginning January 1, 2026, a county officer shall: 138 (a) annually assess a fee: 139 (i) against the property owner of high risk wildland urban interface property within 140 the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the county; and 141 (ii) in the amount set by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands under Section 142 65A-8-402; and 143 (b)(i) after retaining a portion of the fee under Subsection (3)(b)(ii), transmit the fee 144 assessed under Subsection (3)(a) to the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands 145 for deposit into the Wildland-urban Interface Prevention, Preparedness, and 146 Mitigation Fund created in Section 65A-8-215; and 147 (ii) retain that portion of the fee assessed under Subsection (3)(a) necessary to pay 148 costs incurred by the county in implementing this section, which the county may 149 include in the county's annual accounting of wildfire prevention, preparedness, 150 mitigation actions, and associated costs for purposes of Subsection 151 65A-8-203(4)(c). 152 (4) A county may hold a political subdivision lien on high risk wildland urban interface 153 property for a fee that is past due by following the procedures in Sections 17B-1-902 154 and 17B-1-902.1, as if the county is a special district. 155 Section 3. Section 31A-22-1310 is enacted to read: 156 31A-22-1310 . Insuring wildland urban interface property. 157 (1) As used in this section: 158 (a) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means the same as that term is defined 159 in Section 65A-8-401. 160 (b) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 161 65A-8-401. 162 (c) "Wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer" means an insurer that issues 163 property or casualty insurance for wildland urban interface property. - 5 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 164 (2)(a) For purposes of determining whether property is high risk wildland urban 165 interface property, a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer may only 166 use the boundary provided in the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool maintained 167 by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands in accordance with Subsection 168 65A-8-203(8) to determine whether the property is high risk wildland urban interface 169 property. 170 (b) A wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer may use additional fire 171 hazard data, beyond the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool described in 172 Subsection (2)(a), in connection with setting a rate for, or the underwriting of, high 173 risk wildland urban interface property if the wildland urban interface property and 174 casualty insurer's use of additional fire hazard data is in compliance with: 175 (i) the boundary determination made in Subsection (2)(a); and 176 (ii) this title and department rules made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, 177 Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act. 178 (c) If a property is determined not to be high risk wildland urban interface in accordance 179 with Subsection (2)(a), this Subsection (2) does not apply to the use of fire hazard 180 data in connection with rate setting or underwriting of the property. 181 (d) This Subsection (2) does not restrict the use of data or underwriting tools in 182 determining risks that are unrelated to fire risk. 183 (3)(a) If an owner of property located within the wildland urban interface files a 184 complaint with the department asserting that a wildland urban interface property and 185 casualty insurer has violated, or is violating, this section, the department may 186 investigate the wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to determine 187 whether a violation has occurred or is occurring. 188 (b) If after an investigation under this Subsection (3) the department finds that a 189 wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer has violated or is violating this 190 section, the department may: 191 (i) issue prohibitory, mandatory, and other orders as necessary to secure compliance 192 with this section; and 193 (ii) impose penalties against the wildland urban interface property and casualty 194 insurer in accordance with Section 31A-2-308. 195 (4) In addition to complying with relevant requirements of Section 31A-21-303, if due to 196 risks of wildfire a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer: 197 (a) cancels or nonrenews property and casualty insurance covering wildland urban - 6 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 198 interface property, the wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer shall 199 include in the notice of cancellation or nonrenewal the facts on which the wildland 200 urban interface property and casualty insurer's decision is based with reasonable 201 precision; and 202 (b) increases the premium by more than 20% of the previous term's premium for 203 property and casualty insurance covering wildland urban interface property, after 204 receipt of a request for the information by the insured the wildland urban interface 205 property and casualty insurer shall provide the insured the facts on which the 206 wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer's decision is based with 207 reasonable precision. 208 (5) Subsections (1) through (4) apply on and after January 1, 2026. 209 (6) This section does not: 210 (a) create a cause of action for an act or failure to act under this section against: 211 (i) the state; 212 (ii) the department; 213 (iii) the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 214 (iv) an officer, consultant, or employee of the department or Division of Forestry, 215 Fire, and State Lands; 216 (v) a wildland urban interface coordinator, as defined in Section 65A-8-401; or 217 (vi) a county; 218 (b) waive governmental immunity in accordance with Subsection 63G-7-201(5); or 219 (c) create a cause of action against a wildland urban interface property and casualty 220 insurer for use in accordance with Subsection (2)(a) of the boundary provided in the 221 wildfire risk assessment mapping tool maintained by the Division of Forestry, Fire, 222 and State Lands in accordance with Subsection 65A-8-203(8). 223 Section 4. Section 63G-7-201 is amended to read: 224 63G-7-201 . Immunity of governmental entities and employees from suit. 225 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each 226 employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from 227 the exercise of a governmental function. 228 (2) Notwithstanding the waiver of immunity provisions of Section 63G-7-301, a 229 governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit: 230 (a) as provided in Section 78B-4-517; and 231 (b) for any injury or damage resulting from the implementation of or the failure to - 7 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 232 implement measures to: 233 (i) control the causes of epidemic and communicable diseases and other conditions 234 significantly affecting the public health or necessary to protect the public health as 235 set out in Title 26A, Chapter 1, Local Health Departments; 236 (ii) investigate and control suspected bioterrorism and disease as set out in Sections 237 26B-7-316 through 26B-7-324; 238 (iii) respond to a national, state, or local emergency, a public health emergency as 239 defined in Section 26B-7-301, or a declaration by the President of the United 240 States or other federal official requesting public health related activities, including 241 the use, provision, operation, and management of: 242 (A) an emergency shelter; 243 (B) housing; 244 (C) a staging place; or 245 (D) a medical facility; and 246 (iv) adopt methods or measures, in accordance with Section 26B-1-202, for health 247 care providers, public health entities, and health care insurers to coordinate among 248 themselves to verify the identity of the individuals they serve. 249 (3)(a) A governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit, and 250 immunity is not waived, for any injury if the injury arises out of or in connection 251 with, or results from: 252 (i) a latent dangerous or latent defective condition of: 253 (A) any highway, road, street, alley, crosswalk, sidewalk, culvert, tunnel, bridge, 254 or viaduct; or 255 (B) another structure located on any of the items listed in this Subsection (3)(a)(i); 256 or 257 (ii) a latent dangerous or latent defective condition of any public building, structure, 258 dam, reservoir, or other public improvement. 259 (b)(i) As used in this Subsection (3)(b): 260 (A) "Contaminated land" means the same as that term is defined in Section 261 11-58-102. 262 (B) "Contamination" means the condition of land that results from the placement, 263 disposal, or release of hazardous matter on, in, or under the land, including any 264 seeping or escaping of the hazardous matter from the land. 265 (C) "Damage" means any property damage, personal injury, or other injury or any - 8 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 266 loss of any kind, however denominated. 267 (D) "Environmentally compliant" means, as applicable, obtaining a certificate of 268 completion from the Department of Environmental Quality under Section 269 19-8-111 following participation in a voluntary cleanup under Title 19, Chapter 270 8, Voluntary Cleanup Program, obtaining an administrative letter from the 271 Department of Environmental Quality for a discrete phase of a voluntary 272 cleanup that is conducted under a remedial action plan as defined in Section 273 11-58-605, or complying with the terms of an environmental covenant, as 274 defined in Section 57-25-102, signed by an agency, as defined in Section 275 57-25-102, and duly recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in 276 which the contaminated land is located. 277 (E) "Government owner" means a governmental entity, including an independent 278 entity, as defined in Section 63E-1-102, that acquires an ownership interest in 279 land that was contaminated land before the governmental entity or independent 280 entity acquired an ownership interest in the land. 281 (F) "Hazardous matter" means hazardous materials, as defined in Section 19-6-302, 282 hazardous substances, as defined in Section 19-6-302, or landfill material, as 283 defined in Section 11-58-102. 284 (G) "Remediation" means the same as that term is defined in Section 11-58-102. 285 (ii)(A) A government owner and the government owner's officers and employees 286 are immune from suit, and immunity is not waived, for any claim for damage 287 that arises out of or in connection with, or results from, contamination of 288 contaminated land. 289 (B) A government owner's ownership of contaminated land may not be the basis 290 of a claim against the government owner for damage that arises out of or in 291 connection with, or results from, contamination of contaminated land. 292 (iii) Subsection (3)(b)(ii) does not limit or affect: 293 (A) the liability of a person that placed, disposed of, or released hazardous matter 294 on, in, or under the land; or 295 (B) a worker compensation claim of an employee of an entity that conducts work 296 on or related to contaminated land. 297 (iv) Immunity under Subsection (3)(b)(ii)(A) is not affected by a government owner's 298 remediation of contaminated land if the government owner is environmentally 299 compliant. - 9 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 300 (4) A governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit, and 301 immunity is not waived, for any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or 302 omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment, if the injury arises 303 out of or in connection with, or results from: 304 (a) the exercise or performance, or the failure to exercise or perform, a discretionary 305 function, whether or not the discretion is abused; 306 (b) except as provided in Subsections 63G-7-301(2)(j), (3), and (4), assault, battery, 307 false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, intentional trespass, abuse of 308 process, libel, slander, deceit, interference with contract rights, infliction of mental 309 anguish, or violation of civil rights; 310 (c) the issuance, denial, suspension, or revocation of, or the failure or refusal to issue, 311 deny, suspend, or revoke, any permit, license, certificate, approval, order, or similar 312 authorization; 313 (d) a failure to make an inspection or making an inadequate or negligent inspection; 314 (e) the institution or prosecution of any judicial or administrative proceeding, even if 315 malicious or without probable cause; 316 (f) a misrepresentation by an employee whether or not the misrepresentation is negligent 317 or intentional; 318 (g) a riot, unlawful assembly, public demonstration, mob violence, or civil disturbance; 319 (h) the collection or assessment of taxes; 320 (i) an activity of the Utah National Guard; 321 (j) the incarceration of a person in a state prison, county or city jail, or other place of 322 legal confinement; 323 (k) a natural condition on publicly owned or controlled land; 324 (l) a condition existing in connection with an abandoned mine or mining operation; 325 (m) an activity authorized by the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration or 326 the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 327 (n) the operation or existence of a trail that is along a water facility, as defined in Section 328 73-1-8, stream, or river, regardless of ownership or operation of the water facility, 329 stream, or river, if: 330 (i) the trail is designated under a general plan adopted by a municipality under 331 Section 10-9a-401 or by a county under Section 17-27a-401; 332 (ii) the trail right-of-way or the right-of-way where the trail is located is open to 333 public use as evidenced by a written agreement between: - 10 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 334 (A) the owner or operator of the trail right-of-way or of the right-of-way where the 335 trail is located; and 336 (B) the municipality or county where the trail is located; and 337 (iii) the written agreement: 338 (A) contains a plan for operation and maintenance of the trail; and 339 (B) provides that an owner or operator of the trail right-of-way or of the 340 right-of-way where the trail is located has, at a minimum, the same level of 341 immunity from suit as the governmental entity in connection with or resulting 342 from the use of the trail; 343 (o) research or implementation of cloud management or seeding for the clearing of fog; 344 (p) the management of flood waters, earthquakes, or natural disasters; 345 (q) the construction, repair, or operation of flood or storm systems; 346 (r) the operation of an emergency vehicle, while being driven in accordance with the 347 requirements of Section 41-6a-212; 348 (s) the activity of: 349 (i) providing emergency medical assistance; 350 (ii) fighting fire; 351 (iii) regulating, mitigating, or handling hazardous materials or hazardous wastes; 352 (iv) an emergency evacuation; 353 (v) transporting or removing an injured person to a place where emergency medical 354 assistance can be rendered or where the person can be transported by a licensed 355 ambulance service; or 356 (vi) intervening during a dam emergency; 357 (t) the exercise or performance, or the failure to exercise or perform, any function 358 pursuant to Title 73, Chapter 10, Board of Water Resources - Division of Water 359 Resources; 360 (u) an unauthorized access to government records, data, or electronic information 361 systems by any person or entity; 362 (v) an activity of wildlife, as defined in Section 23A-1-101, that arises during the use of 363 a public or private road; 364 (w) a communication between employees of one or more law enforcement agencies 365 related to the employment, disciplinary history, character, professional competence, 366 or physical or mental health of a peace officer, or a former, current, or prospective 367 employee of a law enforcement agency, including any communication made in - 11 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 368 accordance with Section 53-14-103; or 369 (x) providing or failing to provide information under Section 53-27-102 or Subsection 370 41-1a-213(6), (7), or (8), 53-3-207(4), or 53-3-805(5). 371 (5) The following are immune from suit, and immunity is not waived for an action or 372 failure to act within the scope of duties or employment, if the injury arises out of, in 373 connection with, or results from the implementation of Section 17-16-22 to the extent it 374 addresses evaluating and classifying high risk wildland urban interface property, Section 375 31A-22-1310, or Title 65A, Chapter 8, Part 4, Wildland Urban Interface Property: 376 (a) the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 377 (b) an officer, employee, or consultant of the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 378 (c) a county; 379 (d) a wildland urban interface coordinator, as defined in Section 65A-8-401; 380 (e) the Insurance Department; or 381 (f) an officer, employee, or consultant of the Insurance Department. 382 Section 5. Section 65A-8-203 is amended to read: 383 65A-8-203 . Cooperative fire protection agreements with eligible entities. 384 (1) As used in this section: 385 (a) "Eligible entity" means: 386 (i) a county, a municipality, or a special service district, special district, or service 387 area with: 388 (A) wildland fire suppression responsibility as described in Section 11-7-1; and 389 (B) wildland fire suppression cost responsibility and taxing authority for a specific 390 geographic jurisdiction; or 391 (ii) upon approval by the director, a political subdivision established by a county, 392 municipality, special service district, special district, or service area that is 393 responsible for: 394 (A) providing wildland fire suppression services; and 395 (B) paying for the cost of wildland fire suppression services. 396 (b) "Fire service provider" means a public or private entity that fulfills the duties of 397 Subsection 11-7-1(1). 398 (2)(a) The governing body of any eligible entity may enter into a cooperative agreement 399 with the division to receive financial and wildfire management cooperation and 400 assistance from the division, as described in this part. 401 (b) A cooperative agreement shall last for a term of no more than five years and be - 12 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 402 renewable if the eligible entity continues to meet the requirements of this chapter. 403 (3)(a) The state shall assume an eligible entity's cost of suppressing catastrophic wildfire 404 as defined in the cooperative agreement if the eligible entity has entered into, and is 405 in full compliance with, a cooperative agreement with the division, as described in 406 this section. 407 (b) A county or municipality that is not covered by a cooperative agreement with the 408 division, as described in this section, shall be responsible for wildland fire costs 409 within the county or municipality's jurisdiction, as described in Section 65A-8-203.2. 410 (4) To enter into a cooperative agreement with the division, the eligible entity shall: 411 [(a) if the eligible entity is a county, adopt and enforce on unincorporated land a 412 wildland fire ordinance based upon minimum standards established by the division or 413 Uniform Building Code Commission;] 414 [(b)] (a) require that the fire department or equivalent fire service provider under contract 415 with, or delegated by, the eligible entity on unincorporated land meet minimum 416 standards for wildland fire training, certification, and suppression equipment based 417 upon nationally accepted standards as specified by the division; 418 [(c)] (b) invest in prevention, preparedness, and mitigation efforts, as agreed to with the 419 division, that will reduce the eligible entity's risk of catastrophic wildfire; 420 [(d)] (c)(i) file with the division an annual accounting of wildfire prevention, 421 preparedness, mitigation actions, and associated costs; 422 (ii) meet the eligibility entity's participation commitment by making direct payments 423 to the division; or 424 (iii) do a combination of Subsections [(4)(d)(i) and (ii)] (4)(c)(i) and (ii); 425 [(e)] (d) return the financial statement described in Subsection (6), signed by the chief 426 executive of the eligible entity, to the division on or before the date set by the 427 division;[ and] 428 [(f)] (e) if the eligible entity is a county, have a designated fire warden as described in 429 Section 65A-8-209.1[.] ; 430 (f) subject to Subsection (9), adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building 431 standards, as defined in Section 65A-8-401, if the eligible entity is a: 432 (i) county for purposes of an unincorporated area within the county; or 433 (ii) municipality for an incorporated area within a county; and 434 (g) if the eligible entity is a county, comply with Section 17-16-22. 435 (5)(a) The state forester may execute a cooperative agreement with the eligible entity. - 13 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 436 (b) The division shall make rules, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 437 Administrative Rulemaking Act, governing the: 438 (i) cooperative agreements described in this section; 439 (ii) manner in which an eligible entity shall provide proof of compliance with 440 Subsection (4); 441 (iii) manner by which the division may revoke a cooperative agreement if an eligible 442 entity ceases to meet the requirements described in this section; 443 (iv) accounting system for determining suppression costs; 444 (v) manner in which the division shall determine the eligible entity's participation 445 commitment; and 446 (vi) manner in which an eligible entity may appeal a division determination. 447 (6)(a) The division shall send a financial statement to each eligible entity participating in 448 a cooperative agreement that details the eligible entity's participation commitment for 449 the coming fiscal year, including the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation actions 450 agreed to under Subsection (4)[(c)] (b). 451 (b) Each eligible entity participating in a cooperative agreement shall: 452 (i) have the chief executive of the eligible entity sign the financial statement, or the 453 legislative body of the eligible entity approve the financial statement by 454 resolution, confirming the eligible entity's participation for the upcoming year; and 455 (ii) return the financial statement to the division, on or before a date set by the 456 division. 457 (c) A financial statement shall be effective for one calendar year, beginning on the date 458 set by the division, as described in Subsection (6)(b). 459 (7)(a) An eligible entity may revoke a cooperative agreement before the end of the 460 cooperative agreement's term by: 461 (i) informing the division, in writing, of the eligible entity's intention to revoke the 462 cooperative agreement; or 463 (ii) failing to sign and return its annual financial statement, as described in 464 Subsection (6)(b), unless the director grants an extension. 465 (b) An eligible entity may not revoke a cooperative agreement before the end of the term 466 of a signed annual financial statement, as described in Subsection (6)(c). 467 (8)(a) The division shall develop and maintain a wildfire risk assessment mapping tool 468 that is online and publicly accessible. 469 (b)[(i)] The division shall analyze [adding an additional high-risk category] and - 14 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 470 establish by rule, made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 471 Administrative Rulemaking Act, boundaries for high risk wildland urban interface 472 property and what constitutes wildland urban interface property that is not high 473 risk within the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool described in Subsection 474 (8)(a): 475 [(A)] (i) using a scientific assessment; and 476 [(B)] (ii) that is focused on the risk to dwellings within the wildland[-] urban interface 477 area. 478 [(ii) The division shall report the results of the division's analysis under this 479 Subsection (8)(b) to the Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim 480 Committee by no later than the 2024 November interim meeting of that committee.] 481 (c) With regard to the categories used within the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool 482 described in Subsection (8)(a), the division may adjust the assessment for 483 participation commitments if the adjustment is based on the Consumer Price Index 484 for All Urban Consumers as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the 485 United States Department of Labor, in accordance with a formula established by the 486 division by rule made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative 487 Rulemaking Act. 488 (9)(a) If the state under Section 15A-2-103 adopts an edition of the Utah Wildland 489 Urban Interface Code, issued by the International Code Council, with the alternatives 490 or amendments approved by the division, as a wildland urban interface building 491 standard that may be adopted by a local compliance agency: 492 (i) for purposes of an unincorporated area within a county, the county shall adopt and 493 enforce the wildland urban interface building standard described in this 494 Subsection (9)(a); and 495 (ii) for purposes of an incorporated area within a county, the relevant municipality 496 shall adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building standard described 497 in this Subsection (9)(a). 498 (b) If a county or municipality fails to comply with Subsections (4)(f) and (9)(a), the 499 division may choose to not pay costs of the county or municipality under a 500 cooperative agreement executed under this section. 501 (c)(i) If the state adopts a different wildland urban interface building standard than 502 was previously adopted under Section 15A-2-103, a county or municipality has 503 two years from the date the state adopts the different wildland urban interface - 15 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 504 building standard to adopt the appropriate wildland urban interface building 505 standard. 506 (ii) If a county or municipality fails to adopt the appropriate wildland urban interface 507 building standard within the time period described in Subsection (9)(c)(i), the 508 division may choose to not pay costs of the county or municipality under a 509 cooperative agreement executed under this section beginning two years from the 510 day on which the state adopts the different wildland urban interface building 511 standard and until such time as the county or municipality adopts the appropriate 512 wildland urban interface building standard. 513 Section 6. Section 65A-8-215 is amended to read: 514 65A-8-215 . Wildland-urban interface fire prevention, preparedness, and 515 mitigation. 516 (1) As used in this section: 517 (a) "Prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund" means the Wildland-urban Interface 518 Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund created in this section. 519 (b) "Suppression fund" means the Wildland Fire Suppression Fund created in Section 520 65A-8-204. 521 (c) "Wildland-urban interface" means the zone where structures and other human 522 development meets, or intermingles with, undeveloped wildland. 523 (2)(a) There is created an expendable special revenue fund known as the 524 "Wildland-urban Interface Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund." 525 (b) The prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund shall consist of: 526 (i) interest and earnings from the investment of money from the prevention, 527 preparedness, and mitigation fund; 528 (ii) money received as direct payment from cooperative wildfire system participation 529 commitments; 530 (iii) money appropriated by the Legislature;[ and] 531 (iv) money transferred to the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund under 532 Section 63J-1-314[.] ; and 533 (v) fees deposited into the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund under 534 Section 17-16-22. 535 (c) The division shall administer the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund to: 536 (i) pay costs of prevention and preparedness efforts on wildland-urban interface 537 within the state, as defined by the division by rule made in accordance with Title - 16 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 538 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, including costs of an 539 eligible entity that has entered into a cooperative agreement, as described in 540 Section 65A-8-203; 541 (ii) issue fire department assistance grants, which in the aggregate may not exceed 542 10% of the money in the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund each fiscal 543 year; and 544 (iii) in cases of catastrophic need as determined by the state forester, pay costs that 545 could be paid from the suppression fund under Section 65A-8-204. 546 (d) Disbursements from the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund may only be 547 made upon written order of the state forester or the state forester's authorized 548 representative. 549 (3)(a) The division may by rule, made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 550 Administrative Rulemaking Act, establish criteria for community wildfire 551 preparedness plans addressing wildland-urban interface. The criteria shall require 552 action that is: 553 (i) qualitative and quantitative; and 554 (ii) leads to reduced wildfire risk. 555 (b) An eligible entity, as defined in Section 65A-8-203, shall agree to implement 556 prevention, preparedness, and mitigation actions identified in a community wildfire 557 preparedness plan addressing wildland-urban interface that is approved by the 558 division. 559 Section 7. Section 65A-8-401 is enacted to read: 560 Part 4. Wildland Urban Interface Property 561 65A-8-401 . Definitions. 562 As used in this section: 563 (1) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means property located within the 564 boundary of high risk wildland urban interface as designated by the wildfire risk 565 assessment tool in Subsection 65A-8-203(8)(a) and defined by rule made in accordance 566 with Subsection 65A-8-402(5)(a). 567 (2) "Triage scale" means a scale with three classifications adopted by the division to 568 evaluate and classify property located within the wildland urban interface as to what 569 actions are needed to prepare the property for fire. 570 (3) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 571 65A-8a-102. - 17 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 572 (4) "Wildland urban interface building standards" means the edition of the Utah Wildland 573 Urban Interface Code adopted under Section 15A-2-103. 574 (5) "Wildland urban interface coordinator" means a representative of the division or a 575 county who evaluates and classifies wildland urban interface property in accordance 576 with Section 65A-8-402. 577 (6) "Wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer" means the same as that term is 578 defined in Section 31A-22-1310. 579 Section 8. Section 65A-8-402 is enacted to read: 580 65A-8-402 . Evaluation of wildland urban interface property -- Fee amounts -- 581 Rulemaking. 582 (1)(a) The division shall establish a program under which a wildland urban interface 583 coordinator evaluates and classifies high risk wildland urban interface property using 584 a triage scale. 585 (b) The wildland urban interface coordinator shall be: 586 (i) a representative of the division; or 587 (ii) if the evaluation and classification is assigned to a county, a representative of the 588 county. 589 (c) At the beginning of each calendar year, the division shall determine whether to 590 assign evaluation and classification under this section of high risk wildland urban 591 interface property to a county. 592 (2) After completing the evaluation and classification under this section, the wildland urban 593 interface coordinator shall inform a property owner of property described in Subsection 594 (1)(a) of: 595 (a) the classification assigned to the property described in Subsection (1)(a) under the 596 triage scale; 597 (b) the fee the property owner shall pay under Section 17-16-22; and 598 (c) resources from the division or county that the property owner may access to bring the 599 property described in Subsection (1)(a) to the first or second classification by 600 applying wildland urban interface building standards. 601 (3) As part of the program established under this section, the division: 602 (a) may provide resources to a property owner described in Subsection (2)(b) to 603 facilitate the property owner bringing the property described in Subsection (1)(a) to 604 the first or second classification under the triage scale; and 605 (b) beginning on January 1, 2028, shall develop and maintain a database that may be - 18 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 606 accessed by a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to learn the 607 classification under the triage scale for any portion of high risk wildland urban 608 interface property to be covered by the wildland urban interface property and casualty 609 insurer. 610 (4)(a) The division shall annually set a fee amount that is based on the square footage of 611 a structure within the high risk wildland urban interface to pay for the costs 612 associated with the implementation of this part to be assessed and collected by a 613 county in accordance with Section 17-16-22. 614 (b) The division may tier the fee amount to account for what level on the triage scale a 615 property is assigned by a wildland urban interface coordinator. 616 (5) The division may make rules, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 617 Administrative Rulemaking Act, to: 618 (a) define high risk wildland urban interface property and wildland urban interface 619 property that is not high risk as provided in Subsection 65A-8-203(8)(b); 620 (b) establish the criteria used to evaluate and classify property located within high risk 621 wildland urban interface property; 622 (c) create a process by which the division and counties communicate classifications 623 assigned to property described in Subsection (1)(a); 624 (d) create a process for communicating to a property owner the information described in 625 Subsection (2); 626 (e) establish how the division may provide resources under Subsection (3); 627 (f) create a process for a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to learn 628 the classification described in Subsection (3)(b); and 629 (g) establish how the fee amount described in Subsection (4) is set. 630 Section 9. Section 65A-8-403 is enacted to read: 631 65A-8-403 . Liability. 632 This part does not create a cause of action against the state, the division, an officer, 633 employee, or consultant of the division, a county, or a wildland urban interface coordinator for 634 an act or failure to act under this part and does not waive governmental immunity in 635 accordance with Subsection 63G-7-201(5). 636 Section 10. Effective Date. 637 This bill takes effect on January 1, 2026. - 19 - Fire Chief Karl Lieb Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Code Adoption •2025 HB 48 mandates cities to adopt a WUI map (approx. 917 SLC interface properties) and State WUI code by Jan.1 2026. Allows municipalities to remain eligible for wildfire mitigation reimbursements •Adopting the WUI Code (defensible space) is a good idea for all involved – saves lives, reduces wildfire risk, and create options for fire insurance •Code adoption and compliance is the last element to a full Wildfire plan -we are already doing public education and emergency response •Big question: “what is the city doing about their property?” •To fully implement consistent property evaluations/enforcement, city support and collaboration will be necessary Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council October 21, 2025 WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE BUILDING CODE Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHY ADOPT A WUI CODE? •Reduces wildfire risk to people and property •Reduces risk of wildfire become building fires •Emergency response “best practice” •State code requires it (by December 31, 2025) Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHAT IS A WUI CODE? Special building code provisions that: •Require certain building materials •Establishes “defensible space” landscaping regulations •Only applies to specific properties •Title 18, not zoning •WUI takes precedence over similar zoning regulations •Building materials, landscaping, building separation requirements Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Avenues Community Plan Area Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/29/2025 Date Sent to Council: 10/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Norris, Nick E-mail nick.norris@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 10/03/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 10/07/2025 Subject: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Text Amendment Additional Staff Contact: Tony Allred anthony.allred@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Nick Norris nick.norris@slc.gov anthony.allred@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the proposed text amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process 45 day public engagement process and Planning Commission Public Hearing have been completed. The City Council is required to hold a public hearing prior to making a decision regarding this text amendment. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Earlier this year the Utah Legislature passed a law that requires cities to adopt the same wildland urban interface (WUI) code that the State has adopted to be eligible for state level financial reimbursement for fighting wildfires. The state requires cities to adopt this fire code before January 1, 2026 to avoid being noncompliant. The Utah Code requires adoption if the wildland urban interface is at least 640 acres. The total land area of the parcels and lots that would be subject to the WUI code in Salt Lake City is more than 1900 acres. This text amendment would adopt what the same WUI Code identified in Utah Code. A WUI code includes special regulations intended to: • Reducing the risk created by wildfires; • Protect life and property; • Support emergency management best practices; WUI codes are typically applied to properties that are next to or close to larger areas with natural vegetation. Adoption of the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code would subject certain properties to additional fire code requirements related to the construction of new buildings, additions to existing buildings, roofing materials, building materials, and creating defensible space be adding specific landscaping provisions intended to provide spaces between landscaping and buildings. The Fire Department has created a map that shows which properties would be subject to the WUI code. The map is intended to be adopted as part of Title 18 and will not be part of the zoning map because the regulations are building code regulations, not zoning regulations. Only the properties highlighted in the attached map would be subject to the WUI code. The map is attached to the adopting ordinance and found in Planning Commission records. If a property is not highlighted on the map, the WUI code would not apply. The proposal will give precedence to the fire code in situations where the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code and the Zoning Code conflict. The zoning code does regulate building materials, fence materials, and landscaping that may not be allowed under the WUI code. This is likely to occur in the Foothill Residential Zoning Districts, in low density residential zones and local historic districts where properties are adjacent to natural lands, and potentially in other zoning districts where building materials and landscaping are regulated. It may also impact the setbacks of some types of buildings, including garages and sheds, because WUI codes typically require larger setbacks than what the city’s zoning code requires. PUBLIC PROCESS: City Code 21A.10 does not require a 45-day public engagement period for text amendments that are necessary to bring the city code into compliance with state or federal law. However, this item did include a 45-day public input period that started on August 7, 2025 and ended on September 21, 2025. This item was posted on the Planning Division Open House website during this timeframe and all property owners were mailed a notice of the pending code amendment. In addition, the Fire Department presented the proposal to the following recognized organizations: • Capitol Hill • Yalecrest • Sugarhouse • Greater Avenues • Wasatch Hollow • East Bench • Rose Park (parcels removed from final map) • Fairpark (parcels removed from final map) • Glendale (parcels removed from final map) • East Liberty Planning Subcommittee (9/11/2025) A summary of the public input can be found in the Planning Commission records. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 24, 2025 b) PC Minutes of September 24, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: The following is a list of attachments/files to be included in the final transmittal via Laserfiche. These files do not need to be combined into a single PDF; they can be uploaded as separate attachments. Please ensure that each Exhibit is saved with the exact file name specified below. 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Public Comments Received After Staff Report Publication 5) Mailing List 6) Original Petition This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE 1. ORDINANCE V1 1 Project Title: Adopting the Utah Wildland-Urban Interface Code Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00554 Version: 1 Date Prepared: 9/29/2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended 9/24/2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): Sections 1 and 2: Establishes the adoption of the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as adopted by the State of Utah; Section 3: Adopts the Salt Lake City Wildland-Urban Interface Map by reference in 18.44 International Fire Code and Standards Adopted; Section 4: Updates 21A.34.010 by adding a new section that gives precedence to the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code over any conflicting provision of an overlay zoning district; and Section 5: Modifies 21A.36.010 to give precedence to the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code over any conflicting provision found in Title 21A. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Adopts the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code amending Section 18.04.040 as follows:1 18.04.040: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CODES ADOPTED: 2 3 The following codes, as adopted by the State of Utah, along with any adopted appendices are hereby 4 adopted as part of the code of Salt Lake City: 5 The International Building Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code; 6 The International Residential Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code; 7 The International Fire Code; 8 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code 9 International Existing Building Code; 10 International Energy Conservation Code; 11 International Fuel Gas Code; 12 National Electrical Code; 13 The International Mechanical Code; 14 The International Plumbing Code; 15 The International Swimming Pool and Spa Code; 16 Rule R156-56 of the Utah Administrative Code; 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney September 29, 2025 V1 2 ICC/MBI 1205-2021 Standard for Off-Site Construction: Inspection and Regulatory Compliance, or its 18 successor, and 19 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. 20 21 2. Adopts the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code adopted by the State of Utah into the fire22 prevention standards administered by the Fire Department by amending Section 18.44.010 as 23 follows: 24 18.44.010: INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND STANDARDS ADOPTED: 25 A. The edition of the international fire code as adopted by section 15A-5-103, Utah Code Annotated,26 or its successor section is adopted by Salt Lake City as the fire code ordinance, rules and regulations of 27 the city. Appendices A, B, C, E, F, G of the international fire code are specifically adopted by Salt Lake 28 City as part of the fire code of the city. Appendix D of the international fire code, including the 29 amendments to subsection D105.3 provided in Salt Lake City Code section 18.44.020, is also specifically 30 adopted by Salt Lake City as part of the fire code of the city. Hereafter, all references in this code to the 31 fire code shall mean the edition adopted by section 15A-5-103, Utah Code Annotated, or its successor 32 section, together with its appendices. One copy of the international fire code shall be filed for use and 33 examination by the public in the office of the city recorder. 34 B.The Utah Wildland Urban Interface Code as adopted by Utah Code Section 15A-2-103, or its35 successor, is adopted by Salt Lake City as the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code as part of 36 the fire code of the city. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code applies to property shown on 37 the “Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map,” a copy of which shall be maintained on file with the 38 Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office. 39 3. Adopts the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map as referenced in proposed Subsection40 18.44.010.B and as shown in Attachment A. A list of the properties affected by this map is provided in 41 Attachment B. In the event of a conflict between Attachment A and Attachment B, Attachment A will 42 govern. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map declares the wildland urban interface 43 areas within the city and is based on the following findings of fact: 44 A.The Salt Lake City Wildland-Urban Interface Map is based on an assessment of fuel types and45 physical characteristics affecting likely wildland fire behavior within the city; 46 B.That the city is situated on or near two fault lines the Wasatch Fault and the West Valley Fault,47 both capable of generating earthquakes of significant magnitude. These faults are subject to becoming 48 active at any time; the city is particularly vulnerable to devastation should such an earthquake occur. The 49 potential effects of earthquake activity include restricting or eliminating internal circulation due to the 50 potential for collapsing of highway overpasses and underpasses, earth slides, and the potential for vertical 51 movement rendering surface travel unduly burdensome or impossible. Additional potential situations 52 inherent in such an occurrence include loss of the city’s water sources, including local reservoirs, water 53 mains, and storage facilities; broken natural gas mains causing structure and other fires; leakage of 54 V1 3 hazardous materials; the need for rescues from collapsed structures; and the rendering of first aid and 55 other medical attention to large numbers of people. The protection of human life and the preservation of 56 property in the event of such an occurrence support the imposition of fire-protection requirements greater 57 than those set forth in the International Building Code or International Fire Code. 58 C. Seasonal climatic conditions during the summer and fall create numerous serious difficulties 59 regarding the control of and protection against fires in the city. The hot, dry weather typical of this area, 60 coupled with very wet winter and spring conditions that can create abundant grass and shrub fuels that 61 can elevate fire risk, results in wildfires that threaten or could threaten the city. Although some code 62 requirements, such as fire-resistive roof classification, have a direct bearing on building survival in a 63 wildland fire situation, others, such as residential automatic sprinklers, may also have a positive effect. In 64 the city’s dry and generally low humidity climate, many materials are much more easily ignited. More 65 fires are likely to occur and any fire, once started, can expand extremely rapidly. Residential automatic 66 sprinklers can arrest a fire starting within a structure before the fire is able to spread to adjacent brush and 67 structures. The aforementioned problems support the imposition of fire protection requirements greater 68 than those set forth in the International Building Code or International Fire Code. 69 4. Amends Section 21A.34.010 only as to include a new subsection “c” as follows: 70 C. Except as described below with respect to the RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District, the 71 provisions of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code, as adopted in Title 18, shall take 72 precedence over any conflicting provision of an overlay zoning district in this chapter as to those 73 properties shown on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map. If a building permit is submitted 74 that includes plans that may create a conflict between application of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban 75 Interface Code and the RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District, the Salt Lake City Fire Chief and the 76 Director of the Department of Public Utilities, or their designees, will coordinate permit approvals for 77 work in applicable areas to assure that the plans associated with the permit meets the intent and 78 performance of both the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code and the RCO Riparian Corridor 79 Overlay District. 80 5. Amends Section 21A.36.010 Use of Lands and Buildings only by adding a new subsection F to 81 indicate that the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code takes precedence over any conflicting 82 provision found in title 21A. 83 F. Regulations Conflicting with the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code. The Salt Lake 84 City Wildland Urban Interface Code as adopted in Title 18 shall take precedence when a provision of 85 Title 21A conflicts with a provision of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code, but only as to 86 those properties shown on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map. 87 6. Effective Date: This ordinance, if passed, shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake City Recorder. [end] I S t 100 S 200 S 300 S F S t J S t H S t G S t K S t L S t 1st Ave E S t D S t 2nd Ave B S t C S t 11th Ave A S t M S t 5th Ave 9th Ave N S t U S t City Creek Cy n 30 0 E 40 0 E 50 0 E 60 0 E 13th Ave 11 0 0 E 10 0 0 E 12 0 0 E 13 0 0 E P S t Cha n d l e r D r R S t 16th Ave 18th Ave Can y o n R d Al t a S t Tomahaw k D r Was a t c h D r Oa k F o r e s t R d Arlin g t o n D r Wo l c o t t S t Ca n y o n O a k s W a y 18 5 0 E 14 0 0 E Kristianna Cir Hanover Dr Alameda Ave 15 5 0 E 14th Ave Voyles Pl M S t Avenues Planning Community ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550 Feet Attachment A Be c k S t I-1 5 S B F w y I-1 5 N B F w y 600 N 90 0 W 40 0 W Wa r m S p r i n g s R d F S t 500 N 400 N 30 0 W 50 0 W Vic t o r y R d E S t D S t 80 0 W UP R R M a i n O n e R d 20 0 W Can y o n R d B S t Ea s t C a p i t o l B l v d 1000 N 60 0 W 10 0 0 W 1200 N Sa n d h u r s t D r Ma i n S t 800 N Co l u m b u s S t Be c k S t r e e t F r t g 70 0 W 1500 N Oa k F o r e s t R d Ch i c a g o S t 11 0 0 W La f a y e t t e D r Ardmore Pl 11 0 0 W 400 N 800 N 90 0 W Capitol Hill Planning Community ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,200 2,400 3,600600 Feet 23 0 0 E 2100 S I-80 EB F w y I-80 WB Fwy 1300 S 1700 S Parl e y s W a y Sc e n i c D r 25 0 0 E Sherwood Dr 900 S La k e l i n e D r Da l l i n S t Wasatch Dr Foo t h i l l D r Crestview Dr Heritage Way Do n n e r W a y Te x a s S t Comanche Dr Moh a w k W a y Sunnyside Ave Ut e D r Wilson Ave Su m m i t C i r Sc e n i c D r Fo o t h i l l D r 23 0 0 E East Bench Planning Community: Emigration Canyon-Parleys Canyon ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550 Feet 11 0 0 E 19 0 0 E 15 0 0 E 1300 S 1700 S 17 0 0 E 800 S 18 0 0 E 900 S Emerson Ave 16 0 0 E Harvard Ave Harrison Ave Sunnyside Ave Garfield Ave Roosevelt Ave Sherman Ave 12 0 0 E Browning Ave Westminster Ave Yalecrest Ave Mc C l e l l a n d S t Yale Ave Laird Ave 13 0 0 E Bryan Ave Blaine Ave Logan Ave Die s t e l R d Ramona Ave Michigan Ave Hubbard Ave Wilson Ave Mi l i t a r y D r Hollywood Ave Gilme r D r Kensington Ave Wood Ave Princeton Ave Downington Ave Herbert Ave Do u g l a s S t 14 0 0 E Co l o n i a l D r Thornton Ave El i z a b e t h S t 18 0 0 E 13 0 0 E Ramona Ave 14 0 0 E 900 S Laird Ave 14 0 0 E 16 0 0 E Blaine Ave 12 0 0 E 1700 S 17 0 0 E Harvard Ave 18 0 0 E Sunnyside Ave Mc C l e l l a n d S t East Bench Planning Community: Emigration and Red Butte Creeks ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 650 1,300 1,950325 Feet 900 S 1300 S 1700 S 21 0 0 E 17 0 0 E Sunnyside Ave 23 0 0 E 18 0 0 E Fo o t h i l l D r 16 0 0 E Wak a r a W a y Sherwood Dr Ma r i o C a p e c c h i D r Wasatch Dr Yale Ave 500 S Hubbard Ave Arap e e n D r Med i c a l E a s t D r Red B u t t e R d Vald e z D r Poll o c k R d Crestview Dr Do n n e r W a y Col o r o w D r Kensington Ave Bryan Ave Comanche Dr 190 0 E Skylin e D r 22 0 0 E Bake r S t Lewis S t 180 0 E La i r d W a y Arlin g t o n D r 24 0 0 E Hanover Dr Do v e r R d 15 5 0 E 1700 S Sunnyside Ave 19 0 0 E Yale Ave Was a t c h D r Hubbard Ave East Bench Planning Community: University of Utah-Emigration Canyon ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550 Feet OBJECTID *PARCEL_SID HOUSE_NBRST_DIR ST_NAME ST_TYPE UNIT CITY STATE ZIPCODE COUNTY PROP_LOCATION 109 16-11-201-001-0000 2988 E EMIGRATIO RD Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2988 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 116 16-16-179-007-0000 1569 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1569 S 1600 E 117 16-16-179-008-0000 1575 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 S 1600 E 118 16-16-179-009-0000 1583 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 S 1600 E 119 16-16-179-010-0000 1589 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1589 S 1600 E 120 16-16-179-011-0000 1593 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1593 S 1600 E 121 16-16-179-013-0000 1603 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 S 1600 E 122 16-16-179-014-0000 1609 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1609 S 1600 E 123 16-16-179-018-0000 1629 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1629 S 1600 E 124 16-16-179-019-0000 1637 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1637 S 1600 E 125 16-16-179-020-0000 1655 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1655 S 1600 E 126 16-16-179-021-0000 1695 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1695 S 1600 E 127 16-16-179-029-0000 1646 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1646 E KENSINGTON AVE 128 16-16-179-030-0000 1596 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1596 S 1700 E 129 16-16-179-032-0000 1631 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 130 16-16-179-034-0000 1603 S 1600 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 131 16-16-179-035-0000 1609 S 1600 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 S 1600 E 132 16-16-179-036-0000 1597 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 133 16-16-179-037-0000 1599 S 1600 E NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 134 16-16-179-038-0000 1611 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1611 S 1600 E 135 16-16-179-040-0000 1619 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1619 S 1600 E 136 16-16-179-041-0000 1625 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1625 S 1600 E 137 16-16-180-014-0000 1600 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1600 E 1700 S 138 16-16-180-015-0000 1604 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1604-1606 E 1700 S 139 16-16-180-016-0000 1610 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1610 E 1700 S 140 16-16-180-017-0000 1620 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1620 E 1700 S 141 16-16-180-018-0000 1640 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1640 E 1700 S 144 16-16-209-007-0000 1759 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1759 E ROSECREST DR 145 16-16-209-012-0000 1751 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1751 E ROSECREST DR 146 16-16-209-013-0000 1743 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1743 E ROSECREST DR 147 16-16-209-014-0000 1741 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1741 E ROSECREST DR 148 16-16-209-015-0000 1739 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 E ROSECREST DR 149 16-16-209-016-0000 1455 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1455 S 1700 E 150 16-16-209-017-0000 1499 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1453 S 1700 E 182 16-16-251-006-0000 1680 E EMERSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1680 E EMERSON AVE 183 16-16-251-008-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 184 16-16-252-001-0000 1650 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE 185 16-16-252-002-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 186 16-16-252-003-0000 1650 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE #RE 187 16-16-252-004-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 188 16-16-252-013-0000 1614 S 1700 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 189 16-16-252-014-0000 1614 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1614 S 1700 E 190 16-16-252-015-0000 1604 S 1700 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 191 16-16-252-017-0000 1626 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1626 S 1700 E 192 16-16-252-018-0000 1602 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 193 16-16-253-005-0000 1646 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1646 E 1700 S 194 16-16-254-001-0000 1739 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 E KENSINGTON AVE 195 16-16-254-002-0000 1735 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1735 E KENSINGTON AVE 196 16-16-254-003-0000 1729 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1729 E KENSINGTON AVE 197 16-16-254-004-0000 1725 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1725 E KENSINGTON AVE 198 16-16-254-005-0000 1719 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1719 E KENSINGTON AVE 199 16-16-254-006-0000 1715 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1715 E BRYAN AVE 200 16-16-254-007-0000 1709 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1709 E BRYAN AVE 201 16-16-254-008-0000 1705 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1705 E BRYAN AVE 202 16-16-254-009-0000 1745 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1745 E KENSINGTON AVE 203 16-16-254-010-0000 1749 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1749 E KENSINGTON AVE 204 16-16-305-025-0000 1750 S 1500 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1750 S 1500 E 205 16-16-305-026-0000 1444 E WILSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1760 S 1500 E 206 16-16-306-013-0000 1445 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1445 E DOWNINGTON AVE 207 16-16-307-001-0000 1324 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1324-1326 DOWNINGTON AVE 208 16-16-307-002-0000 1334 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1334 E DOWNINGTON AVE 209 16-16-307-003-0000 1344 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1344 E DOWNINGTON AVE 210 16-16-307-004-0000 1350 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1350 E DOWNINGTON AVE 211 16-16-307-005-0000 1358 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1358-1360 DOWNINGTON AVE 212 16-16-307-006-0000 1366 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1366 E DOWNINGTON AVE 213 16-16-307-007-0000 1374 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1374 E DOWNINGTON AVE 214 16-16-307-008-0000 1382 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1384 E DOWNINGTON AVE 215 16-16-307-009-0000 1390 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1390 E DOWNINGTON AVE 216 16-16-307-010-0000 1396 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1396-1398 DOWNINGTON AVE 217 16-16-307-011-0000 1414 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1414 E DOWNINGTON AVE 218 16-16-307-012-0000 1416 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1416 E DOWNINGTON AVE Attachment B 219 16-16-307-013-0000 1422 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1422 E DOWNINGTON AVE 220 16-16-307-014-0000 1432 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1432 E DOWNINGTON AVE 221 16-16-307-015-0000 1440 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1440 E DOWNINGTON AVE 222 16-16-307-016-0000 1446 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1446 E DOWNINGTON AVE 223 16-16-307-017-0000 1328 E ALLEN PAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1328 E ALLEN PARK DR 224 16-16-307-018-0000 1838 S 1500 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1838 S 1500 E 225 16-16-327-001-0000 1504 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1504 E GLEN ARBOR ST 226 16-16-327-002-0000 1510 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1510 E GLEN ARBOR ST 227 16-16-327-003-0000 1516 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1516 E GLEN ARBOR ST 228 16-16-327-004-0000 1522 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1522 E GLEN ARBOR ST 229 16-16-327-005-0000 1528 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1528 E GLEN ARBOR ST 230 16-16-327-007-0000 1538 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST 231 16-16-327-008-0000 1544 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1544 E GLEN ARBOR ST 232 16-16-327-009-0000 1550 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1550 E GLEN ARBOR ST 233 16-16-327-010-0000 1556 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1556 E GLEN ARBOR ST 234 16-16-327-011-0000 1562 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1562 E GLEN ARBOR ST 235 16-16-327-012-0000 1570 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1570 E GLEN ARBOR ST 236 16-16-327-013-0000 1578 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1578 E GLEN ARBOR ST 237 16-16-327-014-0000 1591 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1591 E GLEN ARBOR ST 238 16-16-327-016-0000 1588 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1588 E GLEN ARBOR ST 239 16-16-327-017-0000 1584 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1584 E GLEN ARBOR ST 240 16-16-327-018-0000 1551 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake <Null> 241 16-16-327-019-0000 1605 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1605-1607 E BLAINE AVE 242 16-16-327-021-0000 1623 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1623 E BLAINE AVE 243 16-16-327-022-0000 1635 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1635 E BLAINE AVE 244 16-16-327-025-0000 1532 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1532 E GLEN ARBOR ST 245 16-16-327-026-0000 1536 E GLEN ARBO ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST 246 16-16-327-027-0000 1592 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1592 E GLEN ARBOR ST 247 16-16-327-029-0000 1592 E GLEN ARBO ST NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E BLAINE AVE 248 16-16-327-030-0000 1615 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E BLAINE AVE 249 16-16-328-001-0000 1514 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1514 E BLAINE AVE 250 16-16-328-005-0000 1526 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1526 E BLAINE AVE 251 16-16-328-006-0000 1532 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1532 E BLAINE AVE 252 16-16-328-007-0000 1540 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1540 E BLAINE AVE 253 16-16-328-008-0000 1548 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1548 E BLAINE AVE 254 16-16-328-009-0000 1554 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1554 E BLAINE AVE 255 16-16-328-010-0000 1558 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1558 E BLAINE AVE 256 16-16-328-011-0000 1564 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1564 E BLAINE AVE 257 16-16-328-012-0000 1572 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1572 E BLAINE AVE 258 16-16-328-013-0000 1580 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1580 E BLAINE AVE 259 16-16-328-022-0000 1586 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1586 E BLAINE AVE 260 16-16-330-001-0000 1603 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1602 E BLAINE AVE 261 16-16-330-002-0000 1612 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1612-1614 E BLAINE AVE 262 16-16-330-003-0000 1616 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1616-1618 E BLAINE AVE 263 16-16-330-004-0000 1626 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1626 E BLAINE AVE 264 16-16-330-008-0000 1603 E WILSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 E WILSON AVE 265 16-16-351-001-0000 1325 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1325 E WESTMINSTER AVE 266 16-16-351-002-0000 1329 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1329 E WESTMINSTER AVE 267 16-16-351-003-0000 1335 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1335 E WESTMINSTER AVE 268 16-16-351-004-0000 1341 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1341 E WESTMINSTER AVE 269 16-16-351-005-0000 1343 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1343 E WESTMINSTER AVE 270 16-16-351-006-0000 1357 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1357 E WESTMINSTER AVE 271 16-16-351-007-0000 1363 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1363 E WESTMINSTER AVE 272 16-16-351-008-0000 1369 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1369 E WESTMINSTER AVE 273 16-16-351-009-0000 1375 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1375 E WESTMINSTER AVE 274 16-16-351-010-0000 1379 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1379 E WESTMINSTER AVE 275 16-16-355-001-0000 1403 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1403 E WESTMINSTER AVE 276 16-16-355-002-0000 1413 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1413 E WESTMINSTER AVE 277 16-16-355-003-0000 1421 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1421 E WESTMINSTER AVE 278 16-16-355-004-0000 1427 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1427 E WESTMINSTER AVE 279 16-16-355-005-0000 1433 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1433 E WESTMINSTER AVE 280 16-16-355-006-0000 1441 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1441 E WESTMINSTER AVE 295 16-17-430-003-0000 1877 S 1300 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1877 S 1300 E 296 16-17-430-005-0000 1319 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1319 E WESTMINSTER AVE 297 16-17-430-006-0000 1310 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1310 E DOWNINGTON AVE 298 16-17-430-007-0000 1312 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1312 E DOWNINGTON AVE 299 16-17-430-008-0000 1314 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1314 E DOWNINGTON AVE 300 16-17-430-010-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1311 E WESTMINSTER AVE 301 16-17-431-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 100 302 16-17-431-002-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 101 303 16-17-431-003-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 102 304 16-17-431-004-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 103 305 16-17-431-005-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 104 306 16-17-431-006-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E 337 16-09-182-002-0000 973 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 973 S DIESTEL RD 338 16-09-182-003-0000 971 S DIESTEL RD NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 971 S DIESTEL RD # REAR 339 16-09-182-004-0000 971 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 971 S DIESTEL RD 340 16-09-182-005-0000 965 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 965 S DIESTEL RD 341 16-09-182-006-0000 963 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 963 S DIESTEL RD 342 16-09-182-007-0000 957 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 957 S DIESTEL RD 343 16-09-182-011-0000 953 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 953 S DIESTEL RD 344 16-09-182-012-0000 951 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 951 S DIESTEL RD 345 16-09-182-014-0000 939 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 939 S DIESTEL RD 346 16-09-182-015-0000 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE 347 16-09-252-001-0000 1707 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1707 E 900 S 348 16-09-252-002-0000 867 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 867 S DIESTEL RD 349 16-09-252-003-0000 861 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 861 S DIESTEL RD 350 16-09-252-004-0000 855 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 855 S DIESTEL RD 351 16-09-252-005-0000 851 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 851 S DIESTEL RD 352 16-09-252-006-0000 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 353 16-09-252-009-0000 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 354 16-09-253-001-0000 1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 355 16-09-253-007-0000 1731 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1731 E 900 S 356 16-09-253-008-0000 1741 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1741 E 900 S 357 16-09-253-009-0000 1757 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1757 E 900 S 358 16-09-253-020-0000 1763 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 359 16-09-255-001-0000 935 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 935 S DIESTEL RD 360 16-09-255-002-0000 931 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 931 S DIESTEL RD 361 16-09-255-003-0000 927 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 927 S DIESTEL RD 362 16-09-255-004-0000 923 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 923 S DIESTEL RD 363 16-09-255-005-0000 915 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 915 S DIESTEL RD 364 16-09-255-006-0000 913 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 913 S DIESTEL RD 365 16-09-255-007-0000 911 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 911 S DIESTEL RD 366 16-09-255-008-0000 907 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 907 S DIESTEL RD 367 16-09-255-009-0000 1702 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1702 E 900 S 368 16-09-255-010-0000 1710 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1710 E 900 S 369 16-09-256-002-0000 986 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 986 S MILITARY DR 370 16-09-256-005-0000 976 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 976 S MILITARY DR 371 16-09-256-006-0000 972 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 972 S MILITARY DR 372 16-09-256-007-0000 968 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 968 S MILITARY DR 373 16-09-256-008-0000 966 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 966 S MILITARY DR 374 16-09-256-011-0000 944 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 944 S MILITARY DR 375 16-09-256-012-0000 938 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 938 S MILITARY DR 376 16-09-256-013-0000 932 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 932 S MILITARY DR 377 16-09-256-014-0000 928 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 928 S MILITARY DR 378 16-09-256-015-0000 922 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 922 S MILITARY DR 379 16-09-256-016-0000 916 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 916 S MILITARY DR 380 16-09-256-017-0000 910 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 910 S MILITARY DR 381 16-09-256-018-0000 904 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 904 S MILITARY DR 382 16-09-256-020-0000 988 S MILITARY DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 988 S MILITARY DR # NFF1 383 16-09-256-021-0000 980 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 980 S MILITARY DR 384 16-09-256-022-0000 964 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 964 S MILITARY DR 385 16-09-256-024-0000 954 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 954 S MILITARY DR 427 16-09-327-007-0000 1575 E YALECREST AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 E YALECREST AVE 428 16-09-327-008-0000 1583 E YALECREST AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 E YALECREST AVE 429 16-09-327-011-0000 1540 E BONNEVIEW DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1540 E BONNEVIEW DR 430 16-09-327-012-0000 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE 431 16-09-328-001-0000 1726 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 432 16-09-328-002-0000 1505 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1505 E YALE AVE 433 16-09-328-003-0000 1521 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1521 E YALE AVE 434 16-09-328-005-0000 1537 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1537 E YALE AVE 435 16-09-328-006-0000 1547 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1547 E YALE AVE 436 16-09-328-007-0000 1553 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1553 E YALE AVE 437 16-09-328-008-0000 1561 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1561 E YALE AVE 438 16-09-328-009-0000 1575 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 E YALECREST AVE 439 16-09-328-010-0000 1583 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 E YALECREST AVE 440 16-09-328-011-0000 1589 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1589 E YALECREST AVE 441 16-09-328-012-0000 1601 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1601 E YALECREST AVE 442 16-09-328-013-0000 1607 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1607 E YALECREST AVE 443 16-09-328-014-0000 1615 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E YALECREST AVE 444 16-09-328-015-0000 1619 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1619 E YALECREST AVE 445 16-09-328-016-0000 1627 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1627 E YALECREST AVE 446 16-09-328-017-0000 1635 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1635 E YALECREST AVE 447 16-09-328-018-0000 1030 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1030 S MILITARY DR 448 16-09-328-019-0000 1020 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1020 S MILITARY DR 449 16-09-328-020-0000 1016 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1016 S MILITARY DR 450 16-09-328-021-0000 1000 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1000 S MILITARY DR 451 16-09-328-022-0000 1521 E YALE AVE NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1521 E YALE AVE 452 16-09-328-024-0000 1529 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1529 E YALE AVE 453 16-09-401-002-0000 994 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 994 S MILITARY DR 1012 16-23-179-018-0000 2962 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2962 E BENCHMARK DR 1013 16-23-179-019-0000 2377 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2377 S SUMMIT CIR 1014 16-23-179-020-0000 2387 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2387 S SUMMIT CIR 1015 16-23-251-003-0000 2378 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2378 S CANNON POINT DR 1016 16-23-251-004-0000 2379 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2379 S CANNON POINT DR 1017 16-23-251-006-0000 2396 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2396 S CANNON POINT DR 1018 16-23-251-008-0000 2404 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2404 S CANNON POINT DR 1019 16-23-251-010-0000 2424 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2424 S CANNON POINT DR 1020 16-23-251-012-0000 2438 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2438 S CANNON POINT DR 1021 16-23-251-014-0000 2484 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2484 S CANNON POINT DR 1022 16-23-331-001-0000 2401 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2401 S SUMMIT CIR 1023 16-23-331-002-0000 2423 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2423 S SUMMIT CIR 1024 16-23-331-003-0000 2439 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2439 S SUMMIT CIR 1025 16-23-331-004-0000 2455 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2455 S SUMMIT CIR 1026 16-23-331-005-0000 2465 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2465 S PROMONTORY DR 1027 16-23-331-015-0000 2531 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2531 S SCENIC DR 1028 16-23-331-016-0000 2477 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2477 S PROMONTORY DR 1029 16-23-331-017-0000 2495 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2495 S PROMONTORY DR 1030 16-23-331-018-0000 2513 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2513 S PROMONTORY DR 1031 16-23-451-001-0000 2569 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2569 S SCENIC DR 1032 16-23-251-018-0000 2554 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3042 E CANNON POINT DR 1033 16-14-306-042-0000 1800 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1800 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1034 16-14-306-043-0000 1795 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1795 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1035 16-14-306-016-0000 1847 S WASATCH DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1847 S WASATCH DR # NFF1 1036 16-14-306-017-0000 1871 S WASATCH DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1037 16-14-306-021-0000 1805 S MOHAWK WAY NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1038 16-14-306-022-0000 1799 S DEVONSHI DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1822 S LAKELINE DR 1039 16-14-306-024-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF4 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1040 16-14-306-025-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF5 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1041 16-14-306-027-0000 1867 S WASATCH DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1042 16-14-306-029-0000 1819 S MOHAWK WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1043 16-14-306-030-0000 1805 S MOHAWK WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1044 16-14-306-046-0000 1797 S DEVONSHI DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1045 16-14-306-050-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF6 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1046 16-14-306-051-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF7 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1047 16-14-326-016-0000 1763 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1048 16-14-352-002-0000 1936 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1049 16-14-352-003-0000 1938 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1050 16-14-352-026-0000 1936 S SCENIC DR NFF3 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1051 16-14-353-001-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1052 16-14-353-002-0000 1945 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1945 S SCENIC DR 1053 16-14-353-003-0000 1955 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1955 S SCENIC DR 1054 16-14-353-004-0000 1961 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1961 S SCENIC DR 1055 16-14-353-005-0000 1969 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1969 S SCENIC DR 1056 16-14-353-006-0000 1977 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1977 S SCENIC DR 1057 16-14-353-007-0000 1985 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1985 S SCENIC DR 1058 16-14-353-008-0000 1995 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1995 S SCENIC DR 1059 16-14-353-009-0000 2005 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2005 S SCENIC DR 1060 16-14-353-010-0000 2015 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2015 S SCENIC DR 1061 16-14-353-011-0000 2025 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2025 S SCENIC DR 1062 16-14-353-012-0000 1937 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1063 16-14-353-013-0000 1939 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1064 16-14-353-015-0000 2777 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2777 E 2100 S 1065 16-14-353-016-0000 2090 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2090 S SCENIC CIR 1066 16-14-353-018-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1067 16-14-353-020-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1068 16-14-353-022-0000 1940 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1069 16-14-353-024-0000 2084 S SCENIC CIR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2025 S SCENIC DR 1070 16-14-353-026-0000 2084 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2084 S SCENIC CIR 1071 16-14-353-032-0000 2076 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2076 S SCENIC CIR 1072 16-14-376-006-0000 2799 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2799 E 2100 S 1073 16-14-376-007-0000 2811 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2811 E 2100 S 1074 16-14-376-008-0000 2821 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2821 E 2100 S 1075 16-14-376-009-0000 2831 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2831 E 2100 S 1076 16-14-376-013-0000 2100 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2100 S BELAIRE DR 1077 16-14-376-014-0000 2084 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2084-2086 S BELAIRE DR 1078 16-14-376-015-0000 2080 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2080 S BELAIRE DR 1079 16-14-376-016-0000 2087 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2087 S BELAIRE DR 1080 16-14-376-030-0000 1878 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1878 S LAKELINE DR 1081 16-14-376-031-0000 2052 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2052 S LAKELINE DR 1082 16-14-376-032-0000 2062 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2062 S LAKELINE DR 1083 16-14-376-041-0000 1820 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1084 16-14-376-042-0000 1830 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1830 S LAKELINE DR 1085 16-14-376-043-0000 1840 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1840 S LAKELINE DR 1086 16-14-376-044-0000 1856 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1856 S LAKELINE DR 1087 16-14-376-045-0000 1870 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1870 S LAKELINE DR 1088 16-14-376-048-0000 2002 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1972 S LAKELINE DR 1089 16-14-376-050-0000 2081 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2079 S SCENIC CIR 1090 16-14-376-052-0000 1822 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1091 16-14-376-053-0000 1822 S LAKELINE DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1092 16-14-376-054-0000 1858 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1858 S LAKELINE DR 1093 16-14-376-055-0000 1864 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1868 S LAKELINE DR 1094 16-14-376-056-0000 2857 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2857 E 2100 S 1095 16-14-376-057-0000 2859 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2859 E 2100 S 1096 16-14-376-058-0000 2087 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2087 S SCENIC CIR 1097 16-14-376-060-0000 2841 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2841 E 2100 S 1098 16-14-378-001-0000 1825 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1825 S LAKELINE DR 1099 16-14-378-002-0000 1835 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1835 S LAKELINE DR 1100 16-14-378-003-0000 1849 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1849 S LAKELINE DR 1101 16-14-378-004-0000 1865 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1865 S LAKELINE DR 1102 16-14-400-043-4001 1995 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1972 S LAKELINE DR 1103 09-33-426-001-0000 251 N 1800 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1104 09-33-452-001-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1105 09-33-452-002-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1106 09-33-452-003-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1107 09-33-452-004-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF3 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1108 09-33-452-006-0000 1696 E NORTH CAM DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1109 09-33-452-007-0000 1730 E NORTH CAM DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1110 09-33-452-014-2000 50 N MEDICAL E DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 100 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1111 09-33-452-014-6000 100 N MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 100 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1112 09-33-476-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1113 09-34-300-002-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1114 16-03-100-001-0000 2010 E MEDICAL S DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 320 S WAKARA WY 1115 16-03-100-004-2000 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1116 16-03-100-004-2004 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1117 16-03-100-004-6003 303 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 303 S CHIPETA WY 1118 16-03-100-004-6004 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1119 16-03-100-005-0000 295 S FORT DOUG BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1120 16-03-100-007-0000 295 S MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1121 16-03-100-008-0000 295 S MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1122 16-03-300-002-2000 480 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 480 S WAKARA WY 1123 16-03-300-002-2001 375 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 375 S CHIPETA WY 1124 16-03-300-002-2002 390 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 390 S WAKARA WY 1125 16-03-300-002-2003 360 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 360 S WAKARA WY 1126 16-03-300-002-2004 400 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 400 S WAKARA WY 1127 16-03-300-002-2005 410 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 410 S CHIPETA WY 1128 16-03-300-002-2006 420 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 420 S CHIPETA WY 1129 16-03-300-002-2007 560 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 560 S ARAPEEN DR 1130 16-03-300-002-2008 391 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1131 16-03-300-002-2010 650 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 540 S ARAPEEN DR 1132 16-03-300-002-2012 420 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 420 S WAKARA WY 1133 16-03-300-002-2013 505 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 505 S WAKARA WY 1134 16-03-300-002-2014 540 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 650 S KOMAS DR 1135 16-03-300-002-2019 421 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 419 S WAKARA WY 1136 16-03-300-002-2020 419 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 421 S WAKARA WY 1137 16-03-300-002-2023 600 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 600 S KOMAS DR 1138 16-03-300-002-2024 500 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S CHIPETA WY 1139 16-03-300-002-2026 423 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 423 S WAKARA WY 1140 16-03-300-002-2027 615 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 615 S ARAPEEN DR 1141 16-03-300-002-2028 675 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 675 S ARAPEEN DR 1142 16-03-300-002-6001 375 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1143 16-03-300-002-6002 390 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 390 S WAKARA WY 1144 16-03-300-002-6003 360 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 360 S WAKARA WY 1145 16-03-300-002-6004 400 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 400 S WAKARA WY 1146 16-03-300-002-6005 410 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 410 S CHIPETA WY 1147 16-03-300-002-6006 420 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 420 S CHIPETA WY 1148 16-03-300-002-6007 560 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 560 S ARAPEEN DR 1149 16-03-300-002-6008 391 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1150 16-03-300-002-6009 606 S BLACKHAW WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 606 S BLACKHAWK WY 1151 16-03-300-002-6010 650 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 540 S ARAPEEN DR 1152 16-03-300-002-6011 585 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 585 S KOMAS DR 1153 16-03-300-002-6012 420 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 420 S WAKARA WY 1154 16-03-300-002-6013 505 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 505 S WAKARA WY 1155 16-03-300-002-6014 540 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 650 S KOMAS DR 1156 16-03-300-002-6015 417 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 417 S WAKARA WY 1157 16-03-300-002-6019 421 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 419 S WAKARA WY 1158 16-03-300-002-6020 419 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 421 S WAKARA WY 1159 16-03-300-002-6021 480 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 438 S WAKARA WY 1160 16-03-300-002-6023 600 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 600 S KOMAS DR 1161 16-03-300-002-6024 500 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S CHIPETA WY 1162 16-03-300-002-6026 423 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 423 S WAKARA WY 1163 16-03-300-002-6027 615 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 615 S ARAPEEN DR 1164 16-03-300-002-6028 675 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 675 S ARAPEEN DR 1165 16-03-400-001-0000 403 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 431 S CHIPETA WY 1166 16-03-400-003-0000 515 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1167 16-03-400-004-2000 501 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1168 16-03-400-004-2002 515 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1169 16-03-400-004-2004 575 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 575 S CHIPETA WY 1170 16-03-400-004-2005 579 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 579 S CHIPETA WY 1171 16-03-400-004-6002 497 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1172 16-03-400-004-6003 500 S HUNTSMAN WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S HUNTSMAN WY 1173 16-03-400-004-6004 575 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 575 S CHIPETA WY 1174 16-03-400-004-6005 579 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 577 S CHIPETA WY 1175 16-03-400-004-6007 383 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 383 S COLOROW DR 1176 16-10-126-005-2000 714 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1177 16-10-126-005-2001 770 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 770 S KOMAS DR 1178 16-10-126-005-2002 790 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1179 16-10-126-005-2003 630 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 630 S KOMAS DR 1180 16-10-126-005-6001 770 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 770 S KOMAS DR 1181 16-10-126-005-6002 790 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1182 16-10-126-005-6003 630 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 630 S KOMAS DR 1183 16-10-127-002-0000 785 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 785 S ARAPEEN DR 1184 16-10-127-003-0000 2255 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2255 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1185 16-10-127-004-0000 729 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 729 S ARAPEEN DR 1186 16-10-127-006-0000 2301 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2301 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1187 16-10-226-002-0000 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1188 16-11-102-001-2000 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1189 16-11-102-001-6001 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1190 16-11-102-003-0000 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1191 16-11-126-004-2000 2755 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2755 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1192 09-19-452-001-0000 344 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 344 E OAK FOREST RD 1193 09-19-452-002-0000 380 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 380 E OAK FOREST RD 1194 09-19-452-004-0000 442 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 436 E OAK FOREST RD 1195 09-30-201-008-0000 1110 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1110 N OAK FOREST RD 1196 09-30-201-016-0000 310 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 310 E CANYON OAKS WY 1197 09-30-202-003-0000 1192 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1192 N OAK FOREST RD 1198 09-30-202-008-0000 302 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 302 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1199 09-30-202-009-0000 350 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 350 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1200 09-30-202-010-0000 378 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 378 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1201 09-30-202-011-0000 412 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 412 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1202 09-30-203-001-0000 1302 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1302 N OAK FOREST RD 1203 09-30-203-002-0000 1258 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1258 N OAK FOREST RD 1204 09-30-203-003-0000 337 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 337 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1205 09-30-203-004-0000 373 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 373 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1206 09-30-203-006-0000 407 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 407 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1207 08-14-200-005-0000 2490 N BECK STRE FRTG Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2490 N BECK ST # FRTG 1208 08-14-400-003-0000 2100 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2140 N BECK ST # NFF3 1209 08-14-400-014-0000 2380 N BECK STRE FRTG Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2380 N BECK ST 1210 08-14-400-016-0000 2270 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2270 N BECK ST 1211 08-14-400-017-0000 2200 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2140 N BECK ST # NFF4 1212 08-14-400-020-0000 2080 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2080 N BECK ST 1213 08-23-201-001-0000 2082 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2080 N BECK ST 1214 08-23-201-004-0000 1956 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1954 N BECK ST 1215 08-23-201-008-0000 1954 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1954 N BECK ST 1216 08-23-201-009-0000 1952 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1952 N BECK ST 1217 08-23-201-010-0000 1942 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1942 N BECK ST 1218 08-23-226-002-0000 1940 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1940 N BECK ST 1219 08-23-252-001-0000 1850 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1220 08-23-253-001-0000 1800 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1221 08-23-276-001-0000 1670 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1670 N BECK ST 1222 08-23-405-001-0000 1730 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1223 08-23-427-001-0000 1674 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1664 N BECK ST 1224 08-23-427-002-0000 1630 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1630 N BECK ST 1225 08-23-427-004-0000 1616 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1616 N BECK ST 1226 08-23-482-006-0000 1520 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1500 N BECK ST 1227 08-23-482-008-0000 1594 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1594 N BECK ST 1228 08-24-300-015-0000 1478 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1594 N BECK ST # REAR 1229 08-24-300-017-0000 1450 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1450 N BECK ST 1230 08-24-300-019-0000 1398 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1398 N BECK ST 1231 08-24-300-020-0000 1476 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1514 N BECK ST 1232 08-25-102-003-0000 1370 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1370 N BECK ST 1233 08-25-102-005-0000 1340 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1340 N BECK ST 1234 08-25-126-002-0000 1234 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1234 N BECK ST 1235 08-25-126-003-0000 1224 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1212 N BECK ST 1236 08-25-126-006-0000 1200 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1200-1204 N BECK ST 1237 08-25-126-017-0000 1208 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1208 N BECK ST 1238 08-25-126-018-0000 1202 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1200-1204 N BECK ST 1239 08-25-126-020-0000 1320 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1264 N BECK ST 1240 08-25-126-021-0000 1180 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1180 N BECK ST 1241 08-25-126-024-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1120 N VICTORY RD 1242 08-25-200-008-0000 1020 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1020 N VICTORY RD 1243 08-25-200-010-0000 1000 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1000 N VICTORY RD 1244 08-25-404-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1245 08-25-276-001-0000 975 N CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 977 N CHURCHILL DR 1246 08-25-276-002-0000 7 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 7 E CHURCHILL DR 1247 08-25-276-003-0000 11 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 11 E CHURCHILL DR 1248 08-25-276-004-0000 15 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 15 E CHURCHILL DR 1249 08-25-276-005-0000 19 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 19 E CHURCHILL DR 1250 08-25-276-006-0000 951 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 982 N SANDHURST DR 1251 08-25-278-001-0000 943 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 943 N SANDHURST DR 1252 08-25-278-002-0000 1159 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR 1253 08-25-278-003-0000 1149 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1149 N TWICKENHAM DR 1254 08-25-278-004-0000 1135 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1135 N TWICKENHAM DR 1255 08-25-278-005-0000 1121 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1121 N TWICKENHAM DR 1256 08-25-278-006-0000 1107 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1107 N TWICKENHAM DR 1257 08-25-278-007-0000 60 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 60 W CRAGS CT 1258 08-25-278-009-0000 63 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 63 W CRAGS CT 1259 08-25-278-010-0000 53 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 53 W CRAGS CT 1260 08-25-278-011-0000 1063 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1063 N TWICKENHAM DR 1261 08-25-278-013-0000 1160 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1160 N TWICKENHAM DR 1262 08-25-278-014-0000 1144 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1144 N TWICKENHAM DR 1263 08-25-278-015-0000 1130 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1130 N TWICKENHAM DR 1264 08-25-278-016-0000 1116 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1116 N TWICKENHAM DR 1265 08-25-278-017-0000 1102 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1102 N TWICKENHAM DR 1266 08-25-278-018-0000 1076 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1076 N TWICKENHAM DR 1267 08-25-278-019-0000 982 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 982 N SANDHURST DR 1268 08-25-428-002-0000 941 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 941 N SANDHURST DR 1269 08-25-428-003-0000 927 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 927 N SANDHURST DR 1270 08-25-428-004-0000 913 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 913 N SANDHURST DR 1271 08-25-428-005-0000 899 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 899 N SANDHURST DR 1272 08-25-428-006-0000 885 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 885 N SANDHURST DR 1273 08-25-428-007-0000 871 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 871 N SANDHURST DR 1274 08-25-428-008-0000 857 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 857 N SANDHURST DR 1275 08-25-428-009-0000 843 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 843 N SANDHURST DR 1276 08-25-428-010-0000 829 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 829 N SANDHURST DR 1277 08-25-428-011-0000 815 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 815 N SANDHURST DR 1278 08-25-428-013-0000 8 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 8 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1279 08-25-428-014-0000 22 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 22 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1280 08-25-428-015-0000 36 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 36 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1281 08-25-428-016-0000 42 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 42 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1282 09-19-300-006-0000 1283 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1291 N OAK FOREST RD 1283 09-19-300-009-0000 299 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 299 E OAK FOREST RD 1284 09-19-451-001-0000 349 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 349 E OAK FOREST RD 1285 09-19-451-002-0000 375 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 375 E OAK FOREST RD 1286 09-19-451-003-0000 403 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 403 E OAK FOREST RD 1287 09-19-451-004-0000 429 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 429 E OAK FOREST RD 1288 09-19-451-005-0000 457 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 457 E OAK FOREST RD 1289 09-19-476-001-0000 475 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 475 E OAK FOREST RD 1290 09-19-476-002-0000 1334 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1334 N CANYON OAKS WY 1291 09-30-101-001-0000 1075 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1075 N OAK FOREST RD 1292 09-30-101-009-0000 1233 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1233 N OAK FOREST RD 1293 09-30-101-011-0000 1173 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1173 N OAK FOREST RD 1294 09-30-101-016-0000 1201 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1201 N OAK FOREST RD 1295 09-30-101-018-0000 1065 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1075 N OAK FOREST RD 1296 09-30-101-019-0000 1061 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1061 N OAK FOREST RD 1297 09-30-101-020-0000 1261 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1261 N OAK FOREST RD 1298 09-30-101-023-0000 1043 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1043 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1299 09-30-101-025-0000 1141 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1141 N OAK FOREST RD 1300 09-30-101-026-0000 1101 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1101 N OAK FOREST RD 1301 09-30-151-004-0000 1048 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1048 N CHARTWELL CT 1302 09-30-151-005-0000 1046 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1046 N CHARTWELL CT 1303 09-30-151-006-0000 1040 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1040 N CHARTWELL CT 1304 09-30-151-007-0000 1036 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1036 N CHARTWELL CT 1305 09-30-151-008-0000 1045 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1045 N CHARTWELL CT 1306 09-30-151-009-0000 1039 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1039 N CHARTWELL CT 1307 09-30-151-011-0000 163 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 163 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1308 09-30-152-006-0000 166 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 166 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1309 09-30-153-002-0000 23 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 23 E CHURCHILL DR 1310 09-30-153-003-0000 29 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 29 E CHURCHILL DR 1311 09-30-153-004-0000 41 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 41 E CHURCHILL DR 1312 09-30-153-005-0000 51 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 51 E CHURCHILL DR 1313 09-30-153-006-0000 989 N ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 989 N ENSIGN VISTA DR 1314 09-30-176-001-0000 1034 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1034 N CHARTWELL CT 1315 09-30-176-002-0000 1026 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1026 N CHARTWELL CT 1316 09-30-176-003-0000 209 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 209 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1317 09-30-176-004-0000 219 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 219 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1318 09-30-176-006-0000 229 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 229 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1319 09-30-201-006-0000 1012 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1012 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1320 09-30-201-007-0000 1000 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1000 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1321 09-30-201-009-0000 1104 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1104 N OAK FOREST RD 1322 09-30-201-017-0000 352 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 352 E CANYON OAKS WY 1323 09-30-201-019-0000 1212 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1212 N CANYON OAKS WY 1324 09-30-201-021-0000 1080 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1080 N OAK FOREST RD 1325 09-30-201-022-0000 1066 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1066 N OAK FOREST RD 1326 09-30-201-027-0000 1302 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1302 N CANYON OAKS WY 1327 09-30-201-028-0000 1250 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1250 N CANYON OAKS WY 1328 09-30-201-029-0000 1038 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1038 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1329 09-30-201-030-0000 1024 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1024 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1330 09-30-202-004-0000 355 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 355 E CANYON OAKS WY 1331 09-30-202-005-0000 377 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 377 E CANYON OAKS WY 1332 09-30-202-006-0000 409 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 409 E CANYON OAKS WY 1333 09-30-202-007-0000 369 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 369 E CANYON OAKS WY 1334 09-30-301-009-0000 125 E DORCHEST DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 147 E NORTHSANDRUN RD 1335 09-30-301-012-0000 155 E NORTH SAN RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 155 E NORTHSANDRUN RD 1336 09-30-330-001-0000 970 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 970 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1337 09-30-330-002-0000 960 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 960 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1338 09-30-330-003-0000 946 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 946 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1339 09-30-330-004-0000 934 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 934 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1340 09-30-330-005-0000 922 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 922 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1341 09-30-330-006-0000 906 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 906 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1342 09-30-330-007-0000 900 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1343 09-30-330-008-0000 890 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 890 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1344 09-30-330-009-0000 878 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 878 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1345 09-30-330-010-0000 866 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 866 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1346 09-30-330-011-0000 856 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 856 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1347 09-30-330-012-0000 846 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 846 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1348 09-30-376-001-0000 836 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 836 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1349 09-30-376-002-0000 828 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 828 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1350 09-30-376-003-0000 820 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 820 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1351 09-30-376-004-0000 804 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 804 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1352 09-30-376-005-0000 790 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 790 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1353 09-30-376-006-0000 776 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 776 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1354 09-30-376-007-0000 762 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 762 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1355 09-30-376-008-0000 748 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 748 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD #A 1356 09-30-376-009-0000 736 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 736 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1357 09-30-376-010-0000 724 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 724 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1358 09-30-376-011-0000 710 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 710 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1359 09-30-376-012-0000 704 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 704 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1360 09-30-376-013-0000 698 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 698 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1361 09-30-376-020-0000 690 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1362 09-30-401-001-0000 988 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 988 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1363 09-31-126-002-0000 676 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 676 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1364 09-31-126-003-0000 672 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 672 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1365 09-31-126-004-0000 668 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1366 09-31-126-005-0000 664 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 664 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1367 09-31-126-006-0000 660 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 660 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1368 09-31-126-007-0000 656 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 656 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1369 09-31-126-008-0000 648 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 648 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1370 09-31-126-010-0000 684 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 684 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1371 09-31-126-011-0000 680 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 680 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1372 16-14-400-002-0000 3017 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1833 S LAKELINE DR 1373 16-14-400-011-0000 3029 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3029 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1374 16-14-400-012-0000 3051 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3051 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1375 16-14-400-013-0000 3069 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3069 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1376 16-14-400-014-0000 3081 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3081 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1377 16-14-400-015-0000 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR 1378 16-14-400-016-0000 1879 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR 1379 16-14-400-017-0000 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR 1380 16-14-400-018-0000 3113 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1381 16-14-400-019-0000 3145 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3145 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1382 16-14-400-020-0000 3169 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3169 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1383 16-14-400-021-0000 3183 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3183 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1384 16-14-400-022-0000 3188 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3188 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1385 16-14-400-023-0000 3012 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3012 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1386 16-14-400-024-0000 3020 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3020 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1387 16-14-400-025-0000 3076 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3076 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1388 16-14-400-026-0000 3100 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3100 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1389 16-14-400-027-0000 3116 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3116 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1390 16-14-400-028-0000 3138 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3138 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1391 16-14-400-029-0000 3156 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3156 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1392 16-14-400-030-0000 3176 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3176 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1393 16-14-400-033-0000 3002 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3002 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1394 16-14-400-036-0000 2055 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2055 S LAKELINE DR 1395 16-14-400-040-0000 2093 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2093 S LAKELINE DR 1396 16-14-400-041-0000 2081 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2081 S LAKELINE DR 1397 16-14-400-042-0000 2083 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2081 S LAKELINE DR 1398 16-14-400-043-4002 2992 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2990 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1399 16-23-133-001-0000 2161 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2161 S LAKELINE DR 1400 16-23-133-002-0000 2167 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2167 S LAKELINE DR 1401 16-23-133-003-0000 2191 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2191 S LAKELINE CIR 1402 16-23-133-004-0000 2215 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2215 S LAKELINE CIR 1403 16-23-133-005-0000 2225 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2225 S LAKELINE CIR 1404 16-23-133-008-0000 2253 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2253 S LAKELINE CIR 1405 16-23-133-009-0000 2277 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2277 S BENCHMARK CIR 1406 16-23-133-010-0000 2285 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2285 S BENCHMARK CIR 1407 16-23-133-011-0000 2293 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2293 S BENCHMARK CIR 1408 16-23-133-012-0000 2301 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2301 S BENCHMARK CIR 1409 16-23-133-013-0000 2957 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2957 E BENCHMARK DR 1410 16-23-133-014-0000 2233 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2233 S LAKELINE CIR 1411 16-23-201-001-0000 2111 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2111 S LAKELINE DR 1412 16-23-201-002-0000 2119 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2119 S LAKELINE DR 1413 16-23-201-003-0000 2127 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2127 S LAKELINE DR 1414 16-23-201-004-0000 2133 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2133 S LAKELINE DR 1415 16-23-201-005-0000 2141 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2141 S LAKELINE DR 1416 16-23-201-006-0000 2147 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2147 S LAKELINE DR 1417 16-23-201-018-0000 2155 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2155 S LAKELINE DR 1418 16-23-251-002-0000 2975 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2975 E BENCHMARK DR 1419 16-23-251-004-0000 2379 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2379 S CANNON POINT DR 1420 16-23-251-005-0000 2383 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2383 S CANNON POINT DR 1421 16-23-251-007-0000 2401 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2401 S CANNON POINT DR 1422 16-23-251-009-0000 2421 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2421 S CANNON POINT DR 1423 16-23-251-011-0000 2427 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2427 S CANNON POINT DR 1424 16-23-251-013-0000 2441 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2441 S CANNON POINT DR 1425 16-23-251-014-0000 2484 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2484 S CANNON POINT DR 1426 16-23-251-015-0000 2485 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2485 S CANNON POINT DR 1427 16-23-251-016-0000 2519 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2519 S CANNON POINT DR 1428 16-23-251-017-0000 2555 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3041 E CANNON POINT DR 1429 16-23-251-019-0000 2579 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3063 E CANNON POINT DR 1430 16-23-251-020-0000 2587 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3074 E CANNON POINT DR 1431 16-23-251-021-0000 2588 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3070 E CANNON POINT DR 1432 16-23-251-022-0000 2598 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3072 E CANNON POINT DR 1433 16-23-328-006-0000 2452 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2452 S SCENIC DR 1434 16-23-328-007-0000 2464 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2464 S SCENIC DR 1435 16-23-328-008-0000 2478 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2478 S SCENIC DR 1436 16-23-328-009-0000 2486 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2486 S SCENIC DR 1437 16-23-328-010-0000 2498 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2498 S SCENIC DR 1438 16-23-328-011-0000 2510 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2510 S SCENIC DR 1439 16-23-328-012-0000 2522 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2522 S SCENIC DR 1440 16-23-328-020-0000 2558 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2558 S SCENIC DR 1441 16-23-328-021-0000 2534 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2534 S SCENIC DR 1442 16-23-328-022-0000 2546 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2546 S SCENIC DR 1443 16-23-451-002-0000 2583 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2583 S SCENIC DR 1444 16-23-451-003-0000 2584 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2584 S SCENIC DR 1445 16-23-451-004-0000 2572 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2572 S SCENIC DR 1446 16-11-201-002-0000 3052 E EMIGRATIO RD Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 1447 16-11-262-003-0000 3044 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3044 E KENNEDY DR 1448 16-11-262-004-0000 3054 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3054 E KENNEDY DR 1449 16-11-262-005-0000 3052 E EMIGRATIO RD NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3150 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 1450 16-11-262-006-0000 3100 E KENNEDY DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3100 E KENNEDY DR 1451 16-11-262-007-0000 3094 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3094 E KENNEDY DR 1452 16-11-262-008-0000 3084 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3084 E KENNEDY DR 1453 16-11-262-009-0000 3080 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3080 E KENNEDY DR 1454 16-11-262-010-0000 3070 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3070 E KENNEDY DR 1455 16-11-262-011-0000 3100 E KENNEDY DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3130 E KENNEDY DR 1456 16-11-383-001-0000 2942 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2942 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1457 16-11-383-002-0000 1369 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1458 16-11-383-003-0000 1379 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1379 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1459 16-11-402-004-0000 3021 E CHAUCER PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E CHAUCER PL 1460 16-11-403-004-0000 3020 E CHAUCER PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E CHAUCER PL 1461 16-11-403-008-0000 3025 E DICKENS PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3025 E DICKENS PL 1462 16-11-404-004-0000 3020 E DICKENS PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E DICKENS PL 1463 16-11-404-008-0000 3021 E SHAKESPEA PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E SHAKESPEARE PL 1464 16-11-405-004-0000 3020 E SHAKESPEA PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E SHAKESPEARE PL 1465 16-11-405-008-0000 3021 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E THACKERAY PL 1466 16-11-406-008-0000 3014 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3014 E THACKERAY PL 1467 16-11-406-009-0000 3020 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E THACKERAY PL 1468 16-11-406-014-0000 3017 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3017 E ST MARYS CIR 1469 16-11-451-011-0000 3020 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3018 E ST MARYS CIR 1470 16-11-451-012-0000 3018 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3018 E ST MARYS CIR 1471 16-11-451-013-0000 3013 E SHERWOO DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3013 E SHERWOOD DR 1472 16-11-451-015-0000 3022 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3022 E ST MARYS CIR 1473 16-11-453-009-0000 2954 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2954 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1474 16-11-453-010-0000 2960 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2960 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1475 16-11-453-011-0000 2970 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2970 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1476 16-11-453-018-0000 2972 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2972 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1477 16-11-453-023-0000 3049 E SHERWOO CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3049 E SHERWOOD CIR 1478 16-11-453-024-0000 3060 E SHERWOO CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3060 E SHERWOOD CIR 1479 16-14-129-001-0000 1399 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1399 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1480 16-14-129-002-0000 1409 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1409 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1481 16-14-129-003-0000 1423 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1423 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1482 16-14-129-004-0000 1437 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1437 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1483 16-14-129-005-0000 1449 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1449 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1484 16-14-129-006-0000 1467 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1467 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1485 16-14-129-007-0000 1479 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1479 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1486 16-14-129-008-0000 1497 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1497 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1487 16-14-129-009-0000 1505 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1505 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1488 16-14-129-010-0000 1519 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1519 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1489 16-14-129-011-0000 1529 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1529 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1490 16-14-129-013-0000 2919 E SUNSET CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2919 E SUNSET CIR 1491 16-14-178-002-0000 2916 E SUNSET CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2916 E SUNSET CIR 1492 16-14-178-003-0000 1575 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1493 16-14-178-004-0000 1589 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1589 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1494 16-14-178-007-0000 1627 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1627 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1495 16-14-178-008-0000 1639 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1639 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1496 16-14-178-009-0000 1651 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1651 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1497 16-14-178-010-0000 1663 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1663 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1498 16-14-178-011-0000 1675 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1675 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1499 16-14-178-013-0000 1615 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1615 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1500 16-14-178-014-0000 1599 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1599 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1501 16-14-306-044-0000 1785 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1785 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1502 16-14-306-045-0000 1771 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1771 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1503 16-14-326-002-0000 1699 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1699 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1504 16-14-326-003-0000 1687 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1505 16-14-326-009-0000 1699 S DEVONSHI DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1699 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1506 16-14-326-010-0000 1705 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1705 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1507 16-14-326-011-0000 1711 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1711 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1508 16-14-326-012-0000 1725 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1725 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1509 16-14-326-013-0000 1739 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1510 16-14-326-014-0000 1755 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1755 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1511 09-28-351-001-0000 643 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 643 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1512 09-28-351-002-0000 625 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 625 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1513 09-28-351-003-0000 609 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 609 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1514 09-28-351-004-0000 587 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 587 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1515 09-28-352-001-0000 626 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1516 09-28-352-002-0000 1273 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1273 E TOMAHAWK DR 1517 09-28-352-003-0000 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR 1518 09-28-352-004-0000 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR 1519 09-28-352-005-0000 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR 1520 09-28-354-012-0000 690 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1521 09-28-354-015-0000 658 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 658 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1522 09-28-354-016-0000 644 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1523 09-28-354-021-0000 689 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 689 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1524 09-32-226-003-0000 1171 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1171 E CHANDLER DR 1525 09-32-226-004-0000 1181 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1181 E CHANDLER DR 1526 09-32-226-006-0000 1201 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1201 E CHANDLER DR 1527 09-32-226-007-0000 1225 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1225 E CHANDLER DR 1528 09-33-101-001-0000 573 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 573 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1529 09-33-101-006-0000 529 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 529 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1530 09-33-101-008-0000 1239 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1531 09-33-101-019-0000 537 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 537 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1532 09-33-101-020-0000 563 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1533 09-33-101-021-0000 555 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 555 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1534 09-33-104-001-0000 1353 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1353 E TOMAHAWK DR 1535 09-33-104-002-0000 1367 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1367 E TOMAHAWK DR 1536 09-33-104-005-0000 1341 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1351 E TOMAHAWK DR 1537 09-33-104-006-0000 1335 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1351 E TOMAHAWK DR 1538 09-33-104-008-0000 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR 1539 09-33-126-002-0000 1435 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1435 E TOMAHAWK DR 1540 09-33-126-003-0000 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR 1541 09-33-126-004-0000 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR 1542 09-33-126-005-0000 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR 1543 09-33-126-006-0000 1475 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1475 E TOMAHAWK DR 1544 09-33-126-007-0000 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR 1545 09-33-126-008-0000 1499 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1499 E TOMAHAWK DR 1546 09-33-126-009-0000 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR 1547 09-33-126-010-0000 1517 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1517 E TOMAHAWK DR 1548 09-33-126-011-0000 1527 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1527 E TOMAHAWK DR 1549 09-33-126-012-0000 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR 1550 09-33-126-013-0000 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR 1551 09-33-126-015-0000 1407 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1407 E TOMAHAWK DR 1552 09-33-201-013-0000 1616 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1616 E TOMAHAWK DR 1553 09-33-202-002-0000 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR 1554 09-33-202-005-0000 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR 1555 09-33-202-006-0000 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR 1556 09-33-202-007-0000 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR 1557 09-33-202-008-0000 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR 1558 09-33-202-009-0000 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR 1559 09-33-202-015-0000 1547 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1547 E TOMAHAWK DR 1560 09-33-202-031-0000 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR 1561 09-33-251-005-0000 1627 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1627 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1562 09-33-251-010-0000 1628 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1628 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1563 09-33-251-011-0000 1632 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1632 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1564 09-33-251-012-0000 1648 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1648 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1565 09-33-251-013-0000 1672 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1566 09-33-251-014-0000 1684 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1684 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1567 09-33-251-025-0000 1686 E CONNECTI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1686 E CONNECTICUT DR 1568 09-33-251-030-0000 1604 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1604 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1569 09-33-251-031-0000 1616 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1616 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1570 09-33-251-032-0000 1624 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1624 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1571 09-33-251-033-0000 1636 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1636 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1572 09-33-251-034-0000 1654 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1654 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1573 09-33-251-035-0000 1668 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1668 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1574 09-33-251-036-0000 1548 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1548 E HANOVER DR 1575 09-33-251-037-0000 1566 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1566 E HANOVER DR 1576 09-33-251-038-0000 1578 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1578 E HANOVER DR 1577 09-33-251-039-0000 1590 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1590 E HANOVER DR 1578 09-33-251-040-0000 1610 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1610 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1579 09-33-401-003-0000 333 N FEDERAL H CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 333 N FEDERAL HEIGHTS CIR 1580 09-33-403-003-0000 342 N FEDERAL H CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1581 09-33-403-008-0000 1691 E FEDERAL H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1691 E FEDERAL HEIGHTS DR 1582 09-33-403-013-0000 1771 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1771 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1583 09-33-403-014-0000 1785 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1785 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1584 09-33-403-015-0000 1793 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1793 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1585 09-33-403-016-0000 1803 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1803 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1586 09-33-403-017-0000 1813 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1813 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1587 09-33-403-018-0000 1814 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1814 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1588 09-33-403-021-0000 1757 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1757 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1589 09-33-403-022-0000 1765 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1765 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1590 09-33-404-011-0000 1804 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1804 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1591 09-33-404-012-0000 2 N MEDICAL E DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1815 E NORTHCAMPUS DR 1592 09-29-176-001-0000 1027 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1027 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1593 09-29-176-002-0000 1036 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1036 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1594 09-29-301-007-0000 589 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 589 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1595 09-29-301-008-0000 623 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 623 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1596 09-29-301-010-0000 633 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1597 09-29-301-011-0000 919 N HILLTOP RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 919 N HILLTOP RD 1598 09-29-301-012-0000 915 N HILLTOP RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1599 09-29-326-003-0000 1013 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1013 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1600 09-29-326-004-0000 997 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 997 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1601 09-29-326-005-0000 845 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 845 E EDGEHILL RD 1602 09-29-326-006-0000 835 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 835 E EDGEHILL RD 1603 09-29-326-007-0000 823 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 823 E EDGEHILL RD 1604 09-29-326-008-0000 809 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 809 E EDGEHILL RD 1605 09-29-327-001-0000 657 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 657 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1606 09-29-327-002-0000 669 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 669 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1607 09-29-327-003-0000 681 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 681 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1608 09-29-327-004-0000 697 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 697 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1609 09-29-327-005-0000 711 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 711 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1610 09-29-327-006-0000 725 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 725 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1611 09-29-327-007-0000 760 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 760 E EDGEHILL RD 1612 09-29-327-008-0000 770 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 770 E EDGEHILL RD 1613 09-29-327-009-0000 784 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 784 E EDGEHILL RD 1614 09-29-327-010-0000 800 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 800 E EDGEHILL RD 1615 09-29-327-011-0000 810 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 810 E EDGEHILL RD 1616 09-29-327-012-0000 820 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 820 E EDGEHILL RD 1617 09-29-327-017-0000 729 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 729 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1618 09-29-328-001-0000 1008 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1008 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1619 09-29-328-003-0000 978 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 978 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1620 09-29-328-004-0000 968 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 968 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1621 09-29-328-011-0000 992 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 992 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1622 09-29-328-012-0000 1020 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1020 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1623 09-29-403-001-0000 958 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 958 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1624 09-29-403-002-0000 948 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 948 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1625 09-29-403-003-0000 938 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 938 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1626 09-29-403-004-0000 928 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 928 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1627 09-29-403-006-0000 900 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1628 09-29-403-009-0000 922 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 922 E NORTHVALE WY 1629 09-29-403-010-0000 910 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1630 09-29-403-014-0000 929 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 929 E NORTHVALE WY 1631 09-29-403-015-0000 933 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 936 E NORTHVALE WY 1632 09-29-403-016-0000 930 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 930 E NORTHVALE WY 1633 09-29-403-017-0000 919 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1634 09-29-452-002-0000 999 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 999 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1635 09-29-452-003-0000 1003 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1636 09-29-452-006-0000 1005 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1637 09-29-452-009-0000 975 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 975 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1638 09-29-452-010-0000 987 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 987 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1639 09-29-452-012-0000 939 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 939 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1640 09-29-452-017-0000 1007 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1007 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1641 09-29-452-018-0000 1025 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1025 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1642 09-29-452-019-0000 1043 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1043 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1643 09-29-452-021-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 957 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1644 09-29-480-001-0000 1099 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1099 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1645 09-29-480-002-0000 1113 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1113 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1646 09-29-480-003-0000 1131 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1647 09-29-480-004-0000 1137 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1648 09-29-480-005-0000 747 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 747 N RICHLAND DR 1649 09-29-480-006-0000 1149 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1149 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1650 09-29-480-007-0000 1085 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1085 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1651 09-29-481-001-0000 742 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 742 N RICHLAND DR 1652 09-29-481-002-0000 732 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 732 N RICHLAND DR 1653 09-29-481-003-0000 720 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 720 N RICHLAND DR 1654 09-29-481-004-0000 710 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 710 N RICHLAND DR 1655 09-30-426-001-0000 447 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 447 E NORTHMONT WY 1656 09-30-426-002-0000 451 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 451 E NORTHMONT WY 1657 09-30-426-003-0000 455 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 455 E NORTHMONT WY 1658 09-30-426-004-0000 459 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 459 E NORTHMONT WY 1659 09-30-426-005-0000 469 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 469 E NORTHMONT WY 1660 09-30-426-006-0000 479 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 479 E NORTHMONT WY 1661 09-30-426-007-0000 489 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1662 09-30-426-008-0000 499 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 499 E NORTHMONT WY 1663 09-30-426-009-0000 509 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 509 E NORTHMONT WY 1664 09-30-426-010-0000 519 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 519 E NORTHMONT WY 1665 09-30-427-002-0000 555 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 555 E NORTHMONT WY 1666 09-30-427-003-0000 557 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 557 E NORTHMONT WY 1667 09-30-427-004-0000 561 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 561 E NORTHMONT WY 1668 09-30-427-005-0000 569 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 569 E NORTHMONT WY 1669 09-30-427-007-0000 529 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 529 E NORTHMONT WY 1670 09-30-427-008-0000 545 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 545 E NORTHMONT WY 1671 09-30-452-020-0000 849 N JUNIPERPO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR 1672 09-30-452-021-0000 847 N JUNIPERPO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR 1673 09-30-452-027-0000 803 N GRANDRID DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 803 N GRANDRIDGE DR 1674 09-30-452-028-0000 805 N GRANDRID DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1675 09-30-452-035-0000 789 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 789 N NORTHPOINT DR 1676 09-30-452-036-0000 791 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 791 N NORTHPOINT DR 1677 09-30-452-043-0000 833 N GRANDRID DR 42D Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR 1678 09-30-452-044-0000 835 N GRANDRID CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 835 N GRANDRIDGE CT 1679 09-30-452-051-0000 837 N JUNIPERPO CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 837 N JUNIPERPOINT CT 1680 09-30-452-054-0000 798 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 798 N NORTHPOINT DR 1681 09-30-454-017-0000 341 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 341 E CHARITY CV 1682 09-30-454-020-0000 344 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 344 E CHARITY CV 1683 09-30-454-021-0000 343 E REDBRICK CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 343 E REDBRICK CT 1684 09-30-476-001-0000 445 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 445 E NORTHMONT WY 1685 09-30-476-003-0000 435 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 435 E NORTHMONT WY 1686 09-30-476-004-0000 446 E NORTH HIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 446 E NORTHHILLS DR 1687 09-31-203-001-0000 257 E 11TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 257 E ELEVENTH AVE 1688 09-31-203-012-0000 346 E REDBRICK CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 346 E REDBRICK CT 1689 09-31-203-014-0000 315 E CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE 1690 09-31-203-015-0000 623 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1691 09-31-203-016-0000 615 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1692 09-31-203-030-0000 607 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1693 09-31-203-031-0000 589 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 589 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1694 09-31-203-032-0000 290 E PENNY PAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 290 E PENNY PARADE DR 1695 09-32-202-003-0000 693 N NORTHLAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 693 N NORTHLAND DR 1696 09-32-202-004-0000 677 N NORTHLAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 677 N NORTHLAND DR 1697 09-32-202-007-0000 661 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 661 N SADDLE HILL RD 1698 09-32-202-012-0000 624 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 624 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1699 09-32-202-013-0000 602 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 602 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1700 09-32-202-014-0000 925 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 925 E CHANDLER DR 1701 09-32-202-015-0000 949 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 949 E CHANDLER DR 1702 09-32-229-003-0000 674 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 674 N SADDLE HILL RD 1703 09-32-229-004-0000 686 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 686 N SADDLE HILL RD 1704 09-32-229-007-0000 690 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N RICHLAND DR 1705 09-32-229-008-0000 696 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 696 N RICHLAND DR 1706 09-32-229-012-0000 650 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 650 N SADDLE HILL RD 1707 09-32-229-013-0000 662 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 662 N SADDLE HILL RD This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Chronology June 17, 2025 Petition Initiated by Mayor Mendenhall July 29, 2025 Map provided by Fire Department to show which parcels would be subject to the proposed WUI Code. August 7, 2025 45-day Public Notice and Public Hearing notice (scheduled for September 24, 2025) mailed. August 20, 2025 Notice emailed to recognized organizations. September 3, 2025 Updated map provided by Fire Department September 11, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed (based on updated map) September 24, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing held This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00646 a text amendment to Titles 18 Buildings and Construction that would adopt the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Code, a state fire code that the city is required to adopt, along with a map that shows where the WUI Fire Code would apply. The proposed text amendment also amends Title 21A Zoning to give precedence to the adopted WUI Code where it conflicts with regulations found in Title 21A. The WUI Fire Code applies additional building code requirements for specified properties as indicated on the proposed map. The WUI code regulates certain building materials, construction requirements, building separation, and landscaping provisions in order to reduce the risk of fire. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com . All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Anthony Allred at 801-799-4162 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at anthony.allred@slc.gov The application details can be accessed at https://www.slc.gov/planning/2025/08/07/openhouse2025-00626/. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION Regards, Pat and Teri Akers Salt Lake City, UT 84103 Norris, Nick From:Allred, Anthony Sent:Tuesday, September 16, 2025 4:00 PM To:Norris, Nick Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Re: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code FYI. I responded separately. T Tony Allred Division Chief Fire Prevenon Bureau Salt Lake City Fire Department o:801.799.4162 m:801.654.7416 hps://gcc02.safelinks.protecon.outlook.com/?url=hp%3A%2F%2Ffire.slc.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7CNick.Norris%40 slc.gov%7Ce22a74b6e8f24602d20c08ddf56c657c%7C9fa2c952dd504b06ba6a4b9bd7adda03%7C0%7C0%7C638936568 083961009%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF OIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qrijmW7Z2xpkpsAr38Wqma7IBZz5X8nbtJmpe19iQLY%3D&r eserved=0 -----Original Message----- From: Carleton DeTar Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 2:56 PM To: Allred, Anthony <anthony.allred@slc.gov> Cc: Carleton DeTar Subject: (EXTERNAL) Re: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Cauon: This is an external email. Please be cauous when clicking links or opening aachments. Dear Chief Allred, We support adopng the WUI code to encourage migang measures to protect homes on the edge of the city and to establish an orderly process for insurance companies to assess risks. Our main concern is with the proposed implementaon, as presented at the Greater Avenues City Council meeng earlier this month. It appeared from the maps that the properes designated as highest risk were only those that are immediately adjacent to wild land. So, for example, in our neighborhood, only parcels on Edgehill Rd were marked red. Why such a narrow designaon? Embers from wildfire could carry some distance into the city. Isn't there by new some fairly extensive experience from California fires to determine a more realisc high risk zone. We say this, because when more homes are included, the risk can be spread more broadly. It would be unfair to saddle a few homeowners with the burden of paying extra high insurance premiums to cover the risks of a wider swath of homes. I should menon that our home just missed being in the red zone, so we are arguing against ourselves. But our neighbors are concerned enough that some are considering selling their homes before they get the bad news from their insurance companies. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Carleton DeTar It is also of great concern as to why this “assessment” would only be applied to those residents who have the misfortune to live in the designated WUI area and not to all residents of Salt Lake City. The benefits of the program will extend to all residents of Salt Lake City and therefore all residents should be bearing the costs of this program. Additionally, this taxation-assessment places and unfair burden on these homeowners and I feel, would be more appropriately a shared cost across all homeowners in Salt Lake City. To me, this is similar to the cost sharing that has been implemented in Florida to help cover costs related to hurricanes and flooding in that state and similar to what is happening in California and other states relating to fires and related insurance and disaster coverages in those areas. There are currently no established criteria or standards for evaluating the WUI properties as mandated by 65A-8- 402(1)(a). The adoption of the ordinance prior to defining the criteria for the “triage” and implementation criteria is premature. My wife and I are concerned about the lack of criteria for evaluation, the possibility of an assessment of only the residents living in the WUI and that assessment not being spread across all residents of Salt Lake City and a profound lack of implementation guidelines concerning the program dictated by H.B.48. Please contact us if you have questions and thank you for your time. Regards. Judy A. Daly Joel L. Deaton Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 Norris, Nick From:Allred, Anthony Sent:Wednesday, September 17, 2025 2:17 PM To:Norris, Nick Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Proposed Amendment to the City fire Code FYI. I responded to his quesons separately. Best. Tony Allred Division Chief Fire Prevenon Bureau Salt Lake City Fire Department o:801.799.4162 m:801.654.7416 hps://gcc02.safelinks.protecon.outlook.com/?url=hp%3A%2F%2Ffire.slc.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7CNick.Norris%40 slc.gov%7C085fc6585c8e48e622f108ddf62730fd%7C9fa2c952dd504b06ba6a4b9bd7adda03%7C0%7C0%7C6389373703 61163272%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=boGY655QK0KaNYSl6JZPsY9c%2BQqSGwdNGmhE1HnyztA%3D &reserved=0 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Havlik Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 12:36 PM To: Allred, Anthony <anthony.allred@slc.gov> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Proposed Amendment to the City fire Code Cauon: This is an external email. Please be cauous when clicking links or opening aachments. Dear Mr. Allred, I live in the Avenues and am wring with concerns about the proposed amendment to the City Fire Code, specifically as it regards the WUI areas such as we have in the Avenues. I’m very concerned about fire risk and prevenon, but we need to give careful thought to what we do and how we regulate this. I live in the Wildland Urban Interface area. My understanding is that adopon of the proposed ordinance is mandated by H.B. 48. I support efforts to reduce the risk of wildland fires in Salt Lake City to dwellings. However, I have two concerns. 1) The types and amounts of fees that will be assessed to those living or owning property in the WUI haven’t been determined or announced. I have concerns that the mandate to collect an annual fee from owners of properes located within the wildland urban interface (65A-8-402(2)(b)) could result in prohibive expenses. These funds are to be used “to pay for the costs associated with implementaon of this part. . . .” 65A-8-402(4). What will those costs be ? Are the fees from owners of property in the WUI the only funding source for implementaon ? The benefits of implemenng the Wildland Urban Interface Code extend to all residents of Salt Lake City, not just the homeowners located within the defined wildland urban interface. Accordingly, the cost of the program should be shared by all Salt Lake City residents, not just those who own homes within the interface. The cost of fire prevenon and fire fighng in all other areas of the city is shared by all residents, and the WUI shouldn’t be different. For several years I lived on 1700 East, then for several years I lived on Elizabeth Street. Neither of these residences was in the WUI. I wasn’t expected to pay for all the potenal costs of fire fighng at those addresses - those costs were shared by everyone in the city. In return, I helped pay for the cost of fire prevenon and fire fighng in all other areas of the city. Paying for fire related costs in the WUI should be similarly shared by all residents of the city. In a condominium complex like Northpoint, where I live, will fees be assessed to individual unit owners, or to the HOA as its own enty ? These things should be determined and understood before anything is implemented. In Florida, residents along the coasts are at risk for damage from hurricanes. When owners can’t get or afford insurance, the state has become the insurer of last resort. The cost of that insurance isn’t born just by the cizens living along the coast, instead it is shared by everyone in the state. We should have the same approach here when it comes to fire associated risks and costs. 2) The standards for evaluang wildland urban interface property as mandated by 65A-8-402(1)(a) are not established. Adopng the ordinance in advance of defining the criteria to be used in the “triage scale” , and how individual risk will be determined and defined, is premature. These things should be decided and announced before the amendment is adopted and enacted. 3) There seems to be inconsistency about how fire risk is currently determined and this amendment doesn’t seem to clear that up. ffThe City has their map of fire risk. The state also has a wild fire risk calculator and map, and the two diff significantly. I live at the top of F Street in Northpoint Estates Condominium. Our homes are close to and somemes abung City Creek Canyon, and we are clearly at risk for fire and should do what we can to lower this risk. A stone’s throw away is a new development which Ivory Homes is building and which logically should be at the same risk as our HOA - yet your map doesn’t show them as being at increased risk. The state’s risk calculator tool shows my residence to be at moderate fire risk, yet as near as I can tell the City map places me at high risk. I have friends who live in the St. Mary’s neighborhood. The state’s fire risk tool places their home at high risk for wildfire, yet the City’s map says they are not at any increased risk. Thank you for your consideraon of these issues. Kevin Havlik Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 program should be borne by all Salt Lake City residents, not just those who own homes within this Interface. Second, the standards for evaluating Wildland Urban Interface property as mandated by 65A-8-402(1)(a) are not established. Adopting and subsequently enforcing the ordinance in advance of defining the criteria to be used in the “triage scale” is premature. Such criteria must be clear, unambiguous and understandable. Thank you in advance for consideration of my concerns. Sent from my iPhone look like. We would like to see descriptive information about this posted if applicable so that we can determine if there are specific actions we must take to become compliant with the Code if it is adopted. Thank you. Scott Narus - Higher construction expenses discourage renovation and new homebuilding, deepening the local housing shortage. # 2. One-Size-Fits-All Regulations - The code draws rigid boundaries that ignore variations in topography, prevailing winds, and existing defensible-space efforts. - Communities that have proactively managed vegetation and maintained local firebreaks will be penalized at the same rate as higher-risk areas. # 3. Threat to Housing Affordability and Equity - By driving up building costs, the WUI code disproportionately impacts first-time buyers, service workers, and lower-income families. - Redlining entire neighborhoods as “high-risk” can depress property values and limit our city’s capacity to attract new residents. - Equitable fire safety should balance risk reduction with affordable-housing goals. # 4. Insufficient Public Engagement - The public comment period has been poorly advertised, and town-hall presentations use technical jargon that confuses lay audiences. - A genuine dialogue—complete with visual risk maps and case studies—would build trust and yield better outcomes. # 5. Alternative, Community-Driven Approaches - Offer sliding-scale grants or 0% interest loans to help homeowners make voluntary upgrades. - Coordinate with local fire districts to fund targeted fuel-reduction projects in the highest- risk zones. I respectfully ask the Council to pause adoption of the WUI fire code and pursue a more balanced, locally tailored strategy, with existing grant programs in place prior to adopting any changes. Let’s combine sound science, community input, and targeted incentives rather than prescriptive mandates that penalize responsible residents. Thank you for your careful consideration. Jim Westover SLC resident This page has intentionally been left blank 5. Mailing List PARCEL_PIN OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP OWN_ZIP_FOUR 1.61633E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.60925E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.60933E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>2209 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1118 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>3133 S 2700 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 2822 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>1381 E PARKWAY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 3139 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62345E+13 <Null>53 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1006 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1985 9.33426E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.33476E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.343E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 8.25404E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.62325E+13 <Null>4775 S MILE HIGH DR MILLCREEK UT 84124 4728 1.62325E+13 <Null>2209 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1118 1.62325E+13 <Null>3381 E JOYCE DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 4205 1.62325E+13 <Null>6603 S OLD MILL CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6919 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>1947 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1323 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>787 E AMARA PL MILLCREEK UT 84106 4555 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62345E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62345E+13 <Null>1986 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3131 1.62345E+13 <Null>53 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1006 9.33101E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.33403E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.30426E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.30452E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.61631E+13 1324-1326 DOWNINGTON AVE, A SERIES OF LORD RP LLC LORD RP LLC 8813 S BLUEJAY CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6155 1.61633E+13 1578 GLEN ARBOR, LLC ARBOR, LLC 651 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2118 1.61618E+13 1700 SOUTH, LLC SOUTH, LLC 1753 E CORNELL CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1801 9.19452E+12 5W LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC TMENTS, LLC PO BOX 478 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 478 8.25278E+12 60 W CRAGS CT LLC RAGS CT LLC 68 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1506 9.30376E+12 73 EMPIRE DG, LLC IRE DG, LLC 600 N EASTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2107 8.25276E+12 A FAM LIV TR FAM LIV TR 7 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 8.23427E+12 A&L INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 1630 N BECK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 1215 9.30476E+12 AARON DAVID KING; STEPHANIE KING (JT) E KING (JT)446 E NORTHHILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3334 1.61438E+13 ADAM D AIRD; ALYSON N PAXMAN (JT) PAXMAN (JT)2811 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.62313E+13 ADAM J NORRIS; HEATHER A NORRIS (JT) NORRIS (JT)2191 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 9.30202E+12 ADH PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 3465 N PINES WY STE 104 WILSON WY 83014 9129 1.62333E+13 ADRIANNE B LEE; SHAWN LEE (JT) WN LEE (JT)2495 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 1.61633E+13 AGENTIA J THOMAS; DEAN E THOMAS (JT) THOMAS (JT)1580 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.6232E+13 ALAN & ORLENE COHEN LIVING TRUST 05/19/2022 05/19/2022 2133 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.30452E+12 ALAN & PAMELA LAKOMSKI TRUST 08/05/2013 08/05/2013 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3306 9.30452E+12 ALAN B HAYES & SUSAN E MACNAMARA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 04/16/202 803 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3306 9.29326E+12 ALEXANDER F MITKUS; KATHY-ANNE MIKLOSSY (JT) KLOSSY (JT)845 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.33101E+12 ALEXANDER H BOCOCK ER H BOCOCK 563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.33101E+12 ALEXANDER H BOCOCK; AMY E SULLIVAN (JT) LLIVAN (JT)563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30376E+12 ALEXANDER KRAVETS; VICTORIA TAILLAC (JT) AILLAC (JT)828 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.29452E+12 ALEXANDER LORENZO COLONNA & SARAH VIOLET COLONNA REVOCABLE LIVING 939 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61635E+13 ALEXANDRA BENNING; JUERGEN BENNING (JT) ENNING (JT)1341 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61145E+13 ALI AKBAR MATINKHAH; ROYA KHOSRAVIPOUR (JT) VIPOUR (JT)2972 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.61635E+13 ALISON LITTLEFIELD; RYAN LITTLEFIELD (JT) EFIELD (JT)1375 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61435E+13 ALLAN HARTMAN; ALLISON HARTMAN (JT) ARTMAN (JT)1969 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.60933E+13 ALLEN LIVING TRUST 03/08/2021 03/08/2021 1615 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.61618E+13 ALLISON J GURSKEY N J GURSKEY 1431 S BEACON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2402 1.61418E+13 ALLISON YOUNG LISON YOUNG 1675 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61743E+13 AMANDA JOY BISCHOFF; JON E BISCHOFF; SARAH ANNE BISCHOFF (JT) SCH 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 9.31203E+12 AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.31203E+12 AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 1.61126E+13 AMERICAN TEL & TEL COMPANY TEL COMPANY 1010 PINE ST #6E-L-01 ST LOUIS MO 63101 2015 1.61743E+13 AMY E FLORANCE LIVING TRUST 08/31/2011 08/31/2011 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 1.62333E+13 AMY K BAHNA REVOCABLE TRUST 04/11/2023 04/11/2023 2477 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 1.6114E+13 ANDERS KIERULF; SARA A RICH (JT) A RICH (JT)3021 E CHAUCER PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2503 1.60925E+13 ANDRE G MARTINEZ G MARTINEZ 1757 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 1.61435E+13 ANDREW & KAREN LEITCH LIVING TURST 06/11/2003 06/11/2003 2076 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 9.29403E+12 ANDREW L WAKEFIELD; TARA F WAKEFIELD (JT) EFIELD (JT)568 N I ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3223 1.61618E+13 ANDREW LEIGH FREEMAN; MEGHAN BOYD (JT) N BOYD (JT)1583 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.30426E+12 ANDREW WAKEFIELD REVOCABLE TRUST 12/02/2016 12/02/2016 447 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30427E+12 ANNA GANNET HALLAR; IAN MCCUBBIN (JT) CUBBIN (JT)555 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61743E+13 ANTHONY GODFREY LIVING TRUST 05/03/2024; MALGORZATA S MICHALOWICZ 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 9.29326E+12 ARCHIBALD-NAVAS FAMILY TRUST 02/04/2013 02/04/2013 1013 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4029 9.31126E+12 ARTHUR E GRIFFIN & MARGO A MARKOWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/24/2015 06/2 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 9.31126E+12 ARTHUR E GRIFFIN & MARGO A MARKOWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/24/2015 06/2 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.6033E+13 ARUP LABORATORIES INC ATORIES INC 500 S CHIPETA WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1221 1.61145E+13 ASHOK & XUEJUAN LIN TUTEJA TRUST 03/25/2015 03/25/2015 2954 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.6033E+13 ASSOCIATED REGIONAL AND UNIVERSITY PATHOLOGISTS INC LOGISTS INC 500 S CHIPETA WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1221 9.33126E+12 ATHANASIOS P SEVASTOPOULOS VASTOPOULOS 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.62313E+13 AXXON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LC COMPANY, LC 2155 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.29327E+12 B&D PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 784 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.61631E+13 B&DN2013LT B&DN2013LT 128 S CRESTLINE DR ST GEORGE UT 84790 1123 9.30201E+12 BABCOOK KEETON LIVING TRUST 12/02/2019 12/02/2019 1000 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 1.60925E+13 BARTON LYNN ROBISON; KIMBERLY ANN ROBISON (JT) OBISON (JT)867 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 1.60933E+13 BECKIE WINSTON; PHILLIP H WINSTON (TC) INSTON (TC)1589 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 9.29326E+12 BENJAMIN LANOHA; ALEXIS FREED (JT) FREED (JT)835 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.33251E+12 BENNETT JOINT FAMILY TRUST 11/05/2019 11/05/2019 1686 E CONNECTICUT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4203 1.62318E+13 BERG REVOCABLE TRUST 08/03/2024 08/03/2024 2387 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 1.61633E+13 BERNHARD FASSI; ALLISON JO JUDKINS (JT) UDKINS (JT)1584 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61145E+13 BETTY B CLARK TTY B CLARK 3013 E SHERWOOD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2544 1.61633E+13 BETTY H JEPSON TRUST 9/10/2013 T 9/10/2013 8564 S MARDI GRAS LN WEST JORDAN UT 84088 2762 1.6144E+13 BEVERLIN FAMILY TRUST 08/22/2024 08/22/2024 3183 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.3033E+12 BEVERLY G HARRIE REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 8/27/2013 D 8/27/2013 866 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.2948E+12 BFT BFT 747 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4006 1.61635E+13 BHARADWAJ KADIYALA; VINILA SISTA (JT) SISTA (JT)1392 W 12115 S RIVERTON UT 84065 7425 9.30202E+12 BHUPENDRA PATEL; ANNE KENNEDY (JT) ENNEDY (JT)377 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2252 1.61635E+13 BITTLE FAMILY TRUST 11/01/2023 11/01/2023 1343 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 BLAINE EAST BLAINE EAST 1990 N 4000 W DAYTON ID 83232 1.61633E+13 BLAINE PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3440 S 3650 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3250 1.61633E+13 BLAINE WEST BLAINE WEST 1990 N 4000 W DAYTON ID 83232 1.62318E+13 BLANKEVOORT FAMILY TRUST 11/05/2018 11/05/2018 PO BOX 58643 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 643 8.25428E+12 BOBBY JO ROETZEL; CHARLENE ROETZEL ENE ROETZEL 22 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 1.61145E+13 BOWEN FAMILY TRUST 01/07/2020 01/07/2020 2960 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 9.3033E+12 BRAD AND CONNIE POSS LIVING TRUST 06/19/2023 06/19/2023 890 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.60926E+13 BRADLEY G FISHER; KIM R FISHER (JT) FISHER (JT)916 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.19451E+12 BRADLEY S SCOTT LEY S SCOTT 403 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 8.25126E+12 BRANDON BICKMORE ON BICKMORE 10 S DAWN HILL SANDY UT 84092 4901 1.61635E+13 BRANDON PARRY ANDON PARRY 11918 S JENSON FARM CV DRAPER UT 84020 9.30153E+12 BRIAN A SIMPSON; RACHEL G SIMPSON (JT) IMPSON (JT)23 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.29327E+12 BRIAN CHAN; PRIYA CHAN (JT) A CHAN (JT)669 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61633E+13 BRIAN D FAY BRIAN D FAY 1562 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.62333E+13 BRIAN LINGLE; HEIDI LINGLE (JT) LINGLE (JT)2522 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61621E+13 BRIDGE JONES FAMILY TRUST 09/21/2023 09/21/2023 1741 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61618E+13 BRITTA RETZLAFF BRENNAN AFF BRENNAN 1609 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61618E+13 BRITTA RETZLAFF BRENNAN AFF BRENNAN 1609 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61618E+13 BROKEDOWN PALACE LEGACY TRUST 02/23/2024 02/23/2024 1611 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61636E+13 BRUCE & TONYA SLOAN TRUST 09/30/2003 09/30/2003 1413 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61631E+13 BRUCE B GREEN FAMILY TRUST 08/21/2015 08/21/2015 1334 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 8.25278E+12 BRUCE O PALENSKE; MIKE A TOMPKINS (JT) MPKINS (JT)1076 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2250 9.29327E+12 BRUNS FAMILY TRUST DATED 11/26/2024 11/26/2024 725 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 9.29481E+12 BWL 2006 TR BWL 2006 TR 732 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 9.29328E+12 C FAM TR C FAM TR 978 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33104E+12 CAB REV TR CAB REV TR PO BOX 58007 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 7 1.61435E+13 CARA S DZIUDA; GEOFFREY JOSEPH DZIUDA (JT) DZIUDA (JT)1955 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61618E+13 CARDINAL PROPERTY LLC ROPERTY LLC 2551 N GREEN VALLEY PKWY HENDERSON NV 89014 1.6144E+13 CARL S PETERSEN; PEGGY B PETERSEN (JT) TERSEN (JT)3051 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 9.30452E+12 CARLTON JAMES GROUP LLC S GROUP LLC PO BOX 1110 ATASCADERO CA 93423 9.29326E+12 CAROLINE K MILNE INE K MILNE 809 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.29326E+12 CAROLINE K MILNE INE K MILNE 809 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 1.60933E+13 CAROLYN HARLAN; ROBERT MARK HARLAN (JT) HARLAN (JT)1547 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61618E+13 CASSANDRA FERGUSON LIVING TRUST 07/17/2023 07/17/2023 1575 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 1.61631E+13 CATHERINE CATES; CATHRINE CATES IRREVOCABLE TRUST 08/28/2023 08/2 1414 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.30176E+12 CATHERINE CONNELLY-WARREN ELLY-WARREN 1026 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.33104E+12 CATHERINE COOK; JAN KUBANEK (JT) UBANEK (JT)1353 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 1.60925E+13 CATHERINE MAHER ROMERO; PEDRO ROMERO (JT) ROMERO (JT)1731 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 1.61435E+13 CATHY CHAMBLESS LIVING TRUST 11/23/1998 11/23/1998 1977 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 9.30203E+12 CHARLES B MUSGRAVE; LUANNE TSENG MUSGRAVE (JT) SGRAVE (JT)1302 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2246 9.33251E+12 CHARLES E MAGGELET TRUST 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 PO BOX 980790 PARK CITY UT 84098 701 9.31126E+12 CHERYL M MORI; CHRISTOPHER WARNER (JT) WARNER (JT)656 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 9.31126E+12 CHERYL MORI CHERYL MORI 660 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61631E+13 CHRIS L KLEKAS IS L KLEKAS 1422 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.30376E+12 CHRISTIANE FAURON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 02/24/2010 02/24/2010 820 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.61625E+13 CHRISTINE E WINSLOW TRUST 04/09/1997 04/09/1997 1725 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 9.31126E+12 CHRISTINE ELIZABETH MILLER LIVING TRUST 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 1979 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3367 1.61618E+13 CHRISTOPHER BROCK OPHER BROCK 102 PASEO VIS SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 8.25278E+12 CHRISTOPHER J LURAS; MELISSA K LURAS (JT) LURAS (JT)53 W CRAGS CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2251 1.61625E+13 CHRISTOPHER JAMES LEVIN; KATHERINE HUMPHRIES LEVIN (JT) LEVIN (JT 1739 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 9.28351E+12 CHRISTOPHER M HULL REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT 03/31/2009; ERIN B H 587 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30426E+12 CHRISTOPHER R JOHNSON; KATHARINE A COLES (JT) COLES (JT)455 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 1.61438E+13 CID ENTERPRISES, LLC PRISES, LLC PO BOX 58089 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 89 8.25278E+12 CITIZEN HOUSE, LLC HOUSE, LLC 2782 W LOU JEAN ST TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129 2324 1.61618E+13 CJF TRUST CJF TRUST 1486 W 4950 S TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 4250 9.32229E+12 CLAIRE B STAMPFER REVOCABLE TRUST 08/03/2009 08/03/2009 662 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.28352E+12 CLARK W JOHNSON; BETHANY J PEARSON (JT) EARSON (JT)626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4246 9.28354E+12 CLARK W JOHNSON; BETHANY J PEARSON (JT) EARSON (JT)626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4246 9.31126E+12 CLAUDE R & LAORAINE F BRANDT FAMILY TRUST 09/06/2007 09/06/2007 676 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61145E+13 CMT REV TRUST T REV TRUST 3022 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.6144E+13 COLIN P KING & WENDY KING FAMILY LIVING TRUST 04/19/2001 04/19/20 3176 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.30151E+12 CONSTANCE BENNETT DESHA REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 PO BOX 3594 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 3594 1.60926E+13 CONSTANCE L LIEBER LIVING TRUST 07/30/2014 07/30/2014 1455 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2423 1.61631E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.30301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 1.61621E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9001 1.61631E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.29301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.29301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 1.60933E+13 CORP OF THE PB OF CH JC LDS F CH JC LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 22 1.6232E+13 CORY L MAYLETT; RHONDA H MAYLETT (JT) AYLETT (JT)2147 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.60926E+13 CRAIG L DEMORDAUNT; CHRISTINE R DEMORDAUNT (JT) RDAUNT (JT)932 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30452E+12 CRAIG N PACINI; JULIE M PACINI (JT) PACINI (JT)10454 S GOLDEN WILLOW DR SANDY UT 84070 4236 1.61633E+13 CRIMMEL-WEINBAUER REVOCABLE TRUST 10/05/2023 10/05/2023 1540 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 9.33101E+12 CRUM QUIGLEY FAMILY TRUST 09/05/2024 09/05/2024 537 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30476E+12 CWF TRUST; JHF III TRUST F III TRUST 445 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.32226E+12 CYTOKAM TRUST 12/11/2019 12/11/2019 1201 E CHANDLER CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4237 9.29176E+12 CZ REV TRUST Z REV TRUST 1027 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4029 1.61625E+13 D STEVEN BREWSTER EN BREWSTER 1715 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 9.28352E+12 DAILEY WAGNER LIVING TRUST 12/15/2015 12/15/2015 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.62313E+13 DALE RUTLEDGE; KARRI BURESH (JT) BURESH (JT)2301 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 9.29481E+12 DALE WACHOWIAK; AYAKO YAMAGUCHI (JT) AGUCHI (JT)720 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 1.61435E+13 DAMON SCOTT FETTERS; HONEY FAYE (JT) Y FAYE (JT)2090 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 1.6144E+13 DAN CARY; PAULETTA V CARY (JT) V CARY (JT)3138 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.60918E+13 DANIEL & LORI LOVE TRUST 06/23/2023 06/23/2023 953 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61618E+13 DANIEL L. SPECTOR; GWENDOLYN R. COOK (JT) . COOK (JT)2191 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 2396 9.30201E+12 DANIEL MCARTHUR COTTAM; JOCELYN ROSE XUCI COTTAM (JT) COTTAM (JT)1024 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 1.60918E+13 DARIN & GAIL PICCOLI TRUST 05/16/2017 05/16/2017 939 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25278E+12 DARREN DUNN; AMY DUNN (JT) Y DUNN (JT)1130 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 9.33251E+12 DASP REV TR DASP REV TR 1604 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 9.29403E+12 DAVE WILSON; SHAUNA EDSON (JT) EDSON (JT)948 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33202E+12 DAVID & BETHANY STEINBERG TRUST 06/22/2023 06/22/2023 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 DAVID ANDERSON; GRETA ANDERSON (JT) DERSON (JT)1547 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.30427E+12 DAVID C CLASSEN; LAURIE HOFMANN (JT) OFMANN (JT)561 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61633E+13 DAVID C FAWSON; LINDA J FAWSON (JT) FAWSON (JT)1501 S 2300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2744 1.61633E+13 DAVID FAWSON AVID FAWSON 1501 S 2300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2744 1.61413E+13 DAVID H HUNTSMAN; MICHELLE R HUNTSMAN (JT) NTSMAN (JT)1399 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 1.62313E+13 DAVID KUO; SONYA SONG (JT) A SONG (JT)2233 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 9.28352E+12 DAVID L DEISLEY; JANET E DEISLEY (TC) EISLEY (TC)1273 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.61435E+13 DAVID M PLATT; AUTUMN N WEST (TC) N WEST (TC)1995 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61138E+13 DAVID S GRAY AVID S GRAY 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 9.30426E+12 DAVID SELLER GOLDSMITH; KARA E DIORIO (JT) DIORIO (JT)499 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30151E+12 DAVID URMANN AVID URMANN 1040 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.30201E+12 DAVID W FREED FAMILY TRUST 09/26/2011 09/26/2011 1250 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2253 1.61743E+13 DAVID WILLIAM REICHERT AM REICHERT 1312 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 9.30376E+12 DDS TR DDS TR 736 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.32202E+12 DELORES ANN MERRELL TRUST 10/27/1992 10/27/1992 677 N NORTHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4053 1.61433E+13 DENNIS D REESE; MARY J REESE (JT) REESE (JT)1705 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 1.61635E+13 DEREK & KIMBERLY PAYNE TRUST 07/20/2018 07/20/2018 1369 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 9.3033E+12 DEREK MILLER; LAURA MILLER (JT) MILLER (JT)900 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.61413E+13 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE, LLC DRIVE, LLC 5138 S 4950 W HOOPER UT 84315 1.61418E+13 DEVONSHIRE FAMILY LLC FAMILY LLC 1368 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2563 8.25276E+12 DIANNA GIBSON ANNA GIBSON 2504 E COMMONWEALTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1310 1.60926E+13 DIEFFENBACHER-LAMMERS TRUST 03/11/2022 03/11/2022 986 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60926E+13 DIEFFENBACHER-LAMMERS TRUST 03/11/2022 03/11/2022 986 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.62333E+13 DIMITRIOS & ZOE TSAGARIS FAMILY TRUST 12/15/2017 12/15/2017 3815 S 2900 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3661 9.30452E+12 DJB LIV TRUST B LIV TRUST 791 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3358 1.61625E+13 DONALD A WARNER; KATHLEEN P WARNER (JT) WARNER (JT)1745 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61636E+13 DONALD K BLACKWELL K BLACKWELL PO BOX 504 WILSON WY 83014 8.25276E+12 DORCHESTER POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 3331 S 900 E # 130 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 2083 8.25278E+12 DORCHESTER POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 1558 1.60933E+13 DOUGLAS R CHADWICK; RANDY T WESTPAL (JT) ESTPAL (JT)1521 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 9.32202E+12 DOUGLAS WOSETH GLAS WOSETH 949 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4206 1.6232E+13 DOUNG & BRIGITTE LIRL FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/24/2021 05 2127 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.30176E+12 DRY DOG LLC DRY DOG LLC 15 SANDSTONE CV PARK CITY UT 84060 1.61625E+13 DUGGLEBY-GEROSO FAMILY TRUST 04/13/2018 04/13/2018 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 1.61625E+13 DUGGLEBY-GEROSO FAMILY TRUST 04/13/2018 04/13/2018 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 1.61625E+13 EDWARD A HART; CLARA Y LIEU (JT) Y LIEU (JT)1735 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.6144E+13 EDWARD B FELT; DEBORAH B FELT (JT) B FELT (JT)3029 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 1.60933E+13 ELIZABETH A M JACKSON; DANIEL W JACKSON (JT) ACKSON (JT)440 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3004 1.61631E+13 ELIZABETH ACADEMY ETH ACADEMY 2870 S CONNOR ST MILLCREEK UT 84109 1932 1.62333E+13 ELIZONDO FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 04/11/2018 04/11/2018 2510 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 9.30101E+12 EMERSON LLC EMERSON LLC 546 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4244 9.30101E+12 EMERSON LLC EMERSON LLC 546 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4244 1.60933E+13 EMILY B MCCORMICK; ADAM P MCCORMICK (JT) ORMICK (JT)1607 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60925E+13 EMMA ROTHKOPF; CONOR SCHLOSSER R SCHLOSSER 527 VISTA GLORIOSA DR LOS ANGELES CA 90065 1.61633E+13 EMMA THATCHER; LEVI THATCHER (JT) ATCHER (JT)1591 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3800 9.33126E+12 ERIK T BADGER; AMY K BADGER (JT) BADGER (JT)1407 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.61618E+13 ERIN F CUNNINGHAM; JASON T CUNNINGHAM (JT) INGHAM (JT)1637 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61631E+13 EUGENE S & MEILAN BAIERSCHMIDT REVOCABLE TRUST 04/15/2025 04/15/2 1137 N CROWN KING AVE WASHINGTON UT 84780 2646 1.61633E+13 EVAN JOYCE EVAN JOYCE 825 E STATE ST BOISE ID 83712 9.29328E+12 EVAN MOORE & JOSHUA RHEA REVOCABLE TRUST 02/07/2018 02/07/2018 992 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33251E+12 FEDERAL POINTE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION PO BOX 9375 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 375 9.19451E+12 FITZPATRICK FAMILY TRUST 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 349 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2245 1.61418E+13 FLORIAN SOLZBACHER REVOCABLE TRUST 04/05/2013 04/05/2013 1639 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61413E+13 FLYNN & MIMI JUSTICE LIVING TRUST 04/28/2022 04/28/2022 1437 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 9.31126E+12 FOSTER BOND FOSTER BOND 684 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61438E+13 FRANK J DELROSSI; YVONNE F; AN K DELROSSI (JT) LROSSI (JT)2799 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1444 1.61633E+13 FREDERICK E PEYTON CK E PEYTON 1514 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.61618E+13 FREDRICK C LINDBECK; SHAUNA LINDBECK (JT) NDBECK (JT)1593 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.33126E+12 FU/CHANG FAMILY TRUST 07/25/2012 07/25/2012 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33403E+12 G FAM TR G FAM TR 1814 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4492 1.62318E+13 GABRIEL VANRENEN; MARIA LY VANRENEN (JT) NRENEN (JT)2962 E BENCHMARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1465 1.60925E+13 GARRETT BEECHER ETT BEECHER 851 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 8.25428E+12 GARY B NIEBOER; HEIDI M MCGUIRE-NIEBOER (JT) IEBOER (JT)885 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9.30201E+12 GAY ETTA HEMINGWAY REVOCABLE TRUST 7/16/2021 T 7/16/2021 1212 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2253 1.60933E+13 GEORGE & CATHLEEN KELNER FAMILY LIVING TRUST 06/03/2024 06/03/202 1000 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 9.30376E+12 GEORGE & JANICE NIXON SURVIVORS TRUST 03/24/2024 03/24/2024 836 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.32226E+12 GEORGE E FURGIS; SUSANNE GUSTIN-FURGIS (JT) FURGIS (JT)1181 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4238 9.32226E+12 GEORGE J PAYNE RGE J PAYNE 1171 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4238 9.28352E+12 GEORGE MICHAEL MASTAKAS EL MASTAKAS 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.61633E+13 GIANNA HAMMER ANNA HAMMER 1623 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 8.25276E+12 GINA DALTON REVOCABLE TRUST 02/14/2003 02/14/2003 19 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.32202E+12 GLEN M SCHMIDT; MARIE SCHMIDT (JT) CHMIDT (JT)624 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4033 9.30201E+12 GM RV TRST GM RV TRST 1080 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 1.60926E+13 GMH REV TRUST; PAH REV TRUST H REV TRUST 935 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61631E+13 GOURLEY-SMITH TRUST 10/15/2015 10/15/2015 1416 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 8.25126E+12 GRANT TOWER, LLC TOWER, LLC 2055 E 3900 S # 100 MILLCREEK UT 84124 1766 1.61631E+13 GREG GUNN; J JEFFREY GUNN (JT) Y GUNN (JT)1411 S CANTERBURY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2830 1.60926E+13 GREGG LASSEN (JT) LASSEN (JT)1710 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1334 9.29481E+12 HAMID SHG GHANDEHARI; MITRA JAVDAN (JT) JAVDAN (JT)742 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 8.25428E+12 HANADI FARRUKH; IMAD FARRUKH (TC) ARRUKH (TC)5879 E PIONEER FORK RD EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108 1699 1.61145E+13 HANNAH DANIELS MARQUARDT LIVING TRUST 01/15/2016; DANIEL B MARQUA 2970 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.60926E+13 HANSEN LEGACY PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 2034 E LAIRD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1902 9.19476E+12 HARRIS H SIMMONS S H SIMMONS 475 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 1.60926E+13 HEATHER HOLMGREN; ALEX JONATHAN BELL (JT) N BELL (JT)954 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.33251E+12 HEATHER LOVELL; PAUL LOVELL (JT) LOVELL (JT)1616 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 9.2948E+12 HENRY E COBB TRUST 11/29/2016 11/29/2016 1085 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.61435E+13 HILARY A HEWES; BRENT T ROTONDI (JT) OTONDI (JT)1355 CHERRINGTON PKWY MOON TOWNSHIP PA 15108 1.61438E+13 HILLARY FRANDSEN; STEPHEN FRANDSEN (JT) ANDSEN (JT)PO BOX 2022 PARK CITY UT 84060 1.6232E+13 HM REV TRUST M REV TRUST PO BOX 58183 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 183 9.29481E+12 HOLLY J CARVETH; JOHN R CARVETH (JT) ARVETH (JT)710 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 9.31126E+12 HOLLY RYAN HOLLY RYAN 680 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61743E+13 HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF SUGAR HOUSE CENTRAL PARK CONDOMINIUMS 2045 E WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1156 9.29403E+12 HOUGE REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 11/08/2006 11/08/2006 928 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.61126E+13 HOWARD KENT INC RD KENT INC 450 E BURTON LN KAYSVILLE UT 84032 1.6144E+13 HUGH DANIEL CHACE; GISELLA MACIAS CHACE (JT) CHACE (JT)3156 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.6144E+13 HUISH PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 7511 GREENWOOD AVE N#325 SEATTLE WA 98103 1.6144E+13 HYRULE TRUST 02/22/2018 02/22/2018 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.33404E+12 I.J & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER NITY CENTER 1815 E NORTHCAMPUS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84112 9.30101E+12 IGOR BEST DEVEREUX; CYNTHIA CONNER BEST-DEVEREUX ST-DEVEREUX 1173 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 9.32229E+12 IMRAN ZUBIAR FAMILY TRUST 09/28/2023; DOROTHY ZUBAIR TRUST 12/13/650 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.33126E+12 IRENA R EDWARDS LIVING TRUST 8/6/2019 ST 8/6/2019 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.193E+12 ITF TRUST 04/03/2023 04/03/2023 299 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2245 8.252E+12 JACK B PARSON COMPANIES N COMPANIES 2350 S 1900 W # 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 1.61438E+13 JACKIE M EDGCOMB; PAUL A EDGCOMB (JT) DGCOMB (JT)2831 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.6033E+13 JACOBSEN CONSTRUCTION ONSTRUCTION 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.6033E+13 JACOBSEN CONSTRUCTION CO TRUCTION CO 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.61618E+13 JAKE KIRSHNER; KATIE NICHOLLS (JT) CHOLLS (JT)1619 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 9.32229E+12 JAMES & DEBORAH ALTO TRUST 07/18/2019 07/18/2019 674 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 1.60926E+13 JAMES D WEBSTER; MARYANN S WEBSTER N S WEBSTER 938 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60933E+13 JAMES DOOLIN; NICHOLL R HEIEREN DOOLIN TRUST DATED 1813/2006 D 18 1627 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 9.29452E+12 JAMES HENSHAW; QUINETTE HENSHAW (JT) ENSHAW (JT)1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.29452E+12 JAMES HENSHAW; QUINETTE HENSHAW (JT) ENSHAW (JT)1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.6144E+13 JAMES K & PAMELA A WILFAHRT REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 4/20/2006 T 4/2081 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 1.6144E+13 JAMES K WILFAHRT; PAMELA A WILFAHRT (JT) LFAHRT (JT)2081 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 9.33126E+12 JAMES KENNEDY; SHARON KENNEDY (JT) ENNEDY (JT)1517 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.6144E+13 JAMES S HUNTER ES S HUNTER 3012 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 1.62333E+13 JAMES THOMAS COLLINS MAS COLLINS 2546 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61625E+13 JAMES WINSTON CRAGHEAD & DALE SHARON CRAGHEAD LIVING TRUST 11/7/2 1729 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 8.25278E+12 JARED L SIMON RED L SIMON 1063 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2229 1.6114E+13 JASON HUNZIKER; HOLLY C HUNZIKER (JT) NZIKER (JT)3020 E DICKENS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2505 9.32229E+12 JASON WIESE; ELIANE S WIESE (TC) WIESE (TC)686 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.30101E+12 JEFFREY J ROCCO REVOCABLE TRUST 4/29/2006; ALEXANDRA S ROCCO REVO 1101 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 1.61438E+13 JEFFREY P JOHNSON; CARLA JEAN JOHNSON (JT) OHNSON (JT)2062 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1486 1.60926E+13 JENA CARVER JENA CARVER 907 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61145E+13 JENNIFER H PARKIN REVOCABLE TRUST 08/25/1999 08/25/1999 3060 E SHERWOOD CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2537 9.33202E+12 JEREME THAXTON EME THAXTON 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.61141E+13 JEREMY S LANCHBURY; MARGARET A HALL (JT) A HALL (JT)3021 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2518 9.33403E+12 JESSE M KRANNICH; MEREDITH L KRANNICH (JT) ANNICH (JT)1765 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.60933E+13 JESSE N FOX; VIRGINIA R FOX (TC) R FOX (TC)1575 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 JESSE N FOX; VIRGINIA R FOX (TC) R FOX (TC)1575 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.61145E+13 JESSICA IVANKA TREIDL ANKA TREIDL 3018 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.61145E+13 JESSICA IVANKA TREIDL ANKA TREIDL 3018 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.62313E+13 JESSICA WALSH SSICA WALSH 2225 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 8.23201E+12 JIMMY REYNOLDS TRUST 05/08/2018 05/08/2018 1221 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1207 1.61625E+13 JIYOUNG CHANG; PILSOON LEE (JT) ON LEE (JT)1646 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 9.30426E+12 JLPDR TR JLPDR TR 509 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61636E+13 JLSFT JLSFT 1403 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61631E+13 JMG FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/23/2016 09/23/2016 2313 OAK BLUFF DR CORINTH TX 76210 9.30426E+12 JOAN M ANDREWS; SHANE CARLSON (JT) ARLSON (JT)519 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.60918E+13 JOAN T OBRIEN AN T OBRIEN 973 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60926E+13 JODI L HOWICK DI L HOWICK 972 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30454E+12 JOHANNA BRUNKEN FAMILY RUST AGREEMENT 12/2/1993 T 12/2/1993 341 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5205 1.6144E+13 JOHN & JANE CREER FAMILY TRUST 1/24/2024 T 1/24/2024 3076 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 1.60933E+13 JOHN & LESLIE FRANCIS FAMILY TRUST 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1712 9.33403E+12 JOHN B D'ARCY; FLORA C D'ARCY (JT) D'ARCY (JT)1803 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4493 9.30376E+12 JOHN CLARK; LISA CLARK (JT) CLARK (JT)42 FOREST ST APT 5 NEW CANAAN CT 6840 1.61621E+13 JOHN D WEIST; ELLEN F WEIST (JT) WEIST (JT)1739 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61633E+13 JOHN EDGAR BRANNON GAR BRANNON 1570 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.60918E+13 JOHN L BLACK; KAREN S BLACK (JT) BLACK (JT)957 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.62313E+13 JOHN N NIKOLS LIVING TRUST 07/16/2019 07/16/2019 PO BOX 711458 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 1458 1.62313E+13 JOHN N NIKOLS LIVING TRUST 07/16/2019; NICK J NIKOLS CK J NIKOLS PO BOX 711458 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 1458 9.28351E+12 JOHN R & CLARA T MICHAEL FAMILY TRUST 10/31/2005 10/31/2005 625 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 8.25428E+12 JOHN R MERENDINO TRUST 12/11/2003; LAURA A MERENDINO TRUST 04/19/899 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9.29328E+12 JOHN S. PARKINSON; ALICE R. PARKINSON . PARKINSON 1008 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 9.30151E+12 JOHN THOMAS QUINN HOMAS QUINN 1034 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.33251E+12 JOHNSON-GURTCHEFF REVOCABLE TRUST 02/19/2021 02/19/2021 1636 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.60925E+13 JON LEATHAM PENMAN & RHEIM BARRANI PENMAN LIVING TRUST 10/18/2024 1062 S DOUGLAS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1506 9.33251E+12 JPB TR JPB TR 1566 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 9.30476E+12 JRA 1994 TRUST 1994 TRUST 435 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 1.60918E+13 JSM REV LIV TRUST V LIV TRUST 951 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 9.3033E+12 JULIE FREED TRUST 03/06/2009 03/06/2009 878 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.6144E+13 JULIEN BAUDRAND EN BAUDRAND 2093 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 1.62313E+13 JULIET MICKELSON T MICKELSON 2957 E BENCHMARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1466 1.61631E+13 K LVG TR K LVG TR 1446 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 1.61633E+13 KANNIKAR MARSHALL; VERLAN T MARSHALL (JT) RSHALL (JT)1544 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61145E+13 KAREN H HUNTSMAN H HUNTSMAN 500 S HUNTSMAN WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1235 9.33101E+12 KARL & TERRI LINS REVOCABLE TRUST 08/13/2024 08/13/2024 573 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 1.61438E+13 KARL A SOWA TRUST 09/12/2005 09/12/2005 2841 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 9.29327E+12 KATHERINE C ROMNEY REVOCABLE TRUST 12/21/2023 12/21/2023 770 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.6144E+13 KATZ REVOCABLE TRUST 03/01/2024 03/01/2024 875 S DONNER WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2102 8.25428E+12 KAY PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 1256 S 1000 W VERNAL UT 84078 9.30153E+12 KAYE L GUNNELL; RONALD C GUNNELL (JT) UNNELL (JT)51 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.19452E+12 KEELEY M HELLBERG TRUST 07/26/2002 07/26/2002 380 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2247 1.61633E+13 KENNER B KINGSTON; JENNIFER KINGSTON (JT) NGSTON (JT)1615 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 1.61633E+13 KENNER B KINGSTON; JENNIFER KINGSTON (JT) NGSTON (JT)1615 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 1.61435E+13 KENNETH F RASMUSSEN LIVING TRUST 12/19/1997; SHAWNA M RASMUSSEN L 1334 E WILSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3739 1.62333E+13 KENNETH R DAVIS ETH R DAVIS 2465 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1469 1.62333E+13 KENNY LAM; KIM N LAM (JT) N LAM (JT)2534 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 9.33251E+12 KENT & CAPPEY JONES TRUST 02/01/2013 02/01/2013 1627 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4205 9.2948E+12 KENT FLOYD FULLER & ELLA CHRISTINE FULLER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1113 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 1.6144E+13 KEVIN A KEEFE; KAREN G KEEFE (JT) KEEFE (JT)325 PENN RD UNIT 102 WYNNEWOOD PA 19096 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30101E+12 KEVIN L BOTT; TESSA BOTT (JT) A BOTT (JT)1110 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 1.61435E+13 KIM COLLINS-SMITH & RONALD DAVIDSON SMITH REVOCABLE TRUST 05/16/2 1945 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.6144E+13 KJR FAM LIV TRUST M LIV TRUST 3100 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61625E+13 KMA FAM LIV TRUST M LIV TRUST 1719 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61625E+13 KOBE TRUST 12/12/2014 12/12/2014 1680 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2730 1.6033E+13 KOMAS LLC KOMAS LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.62333E+13 KRIS N JOHNSON S N JOHNSON 2558 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61633E+13 KRISTEN M STRAY; JAMES E STRAY (JT) STRAY (JT)3615 E LAUREL CREEK DR SAN MATEO CA 94403 4027 1.61413E+13 KRISTIN P HOPSON TRUST 12/27/2021 12/27/2021 1505 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2531 9.33404E+12 KUEHNE FAMILY TRUST 02/10/2021 02/10/2021 1804 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4492 8.142E+12 L R P INVESTMENT LLC ESTMENT LLC PO BOX 700 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 8.144E+12 L R P, LLC L R P, LLC PO BOX 540700 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 1.61431E+13 LAKSHMANAN VENKITARAMAN; DEEPTHI LAKSHMAN (JT) KSHMAN (JT)1771 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 1.61633E+13 LARRY & ANN WRIGHT FAMILY TRUST 03/01/2021 03/01/2021 1554 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 8.25278E+12 LARRY & LORI DALTON TRUST 02/03/2005 02/03/2005 1149 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25278E+12 LARRY F MAURER; JOLENE M MAURER (JT) MAURER (JT)1107 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.62333E+13 LARRY SHELTON RRY SHELTON 2531 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1485 1.61431E+13 LAURA FORSGREN; MATT FORSGREN (JT) RSGREN (JT)4033 S PARKVIEW DR MILLCREEK UT 84124 3418 1.61438E+13 LAURA IMES MCBRIDE MES MCBRIDE 2821 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61618E+13 LAURA MCDONOUGH A MCDONOUGH 1695 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.62313E+13 LAURA MCNERNEY; NICHOLAS BERTAGNOLLI BERTAGNOLLI 2293 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 1.62333E+13 LE TRAN; VAN TRAN (JT) N TRAN (JT)2464 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 9.30203E+12 LEIGH ANNE NEUMEYER REVOCABLE TRUST 8/21/2016 T 8/21/2016 375 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2256 9.2948E+12 LEO & HARRIET HOPF LIVING TRUST 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 1099 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.61126E+13 LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 08/29/2022 08/29/2022 3054 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2123 1.61431E+13 LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 11/14/2011 11/14/2011 1901 CALLE DE ESPANA LAS VEGAS NV 89102 8.144E+12 LEWIS, FOSS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC RUCTION INC 2350 S 1900 W STE 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 8.23201E+12 LEXICON INVESTMENTS, LLC TMENTS, LLC 1942 N BECK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 1221 9.30202E+12 LGH TRST LGH TRST 409 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2282 9.30202E+12 LGH TRST LGH TRST 409 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2282 1.61743E+13 LIANA HATHAWAY; JOHN ROBERT WISE (JT) T WISE (JT)50960 FOX TRAIL GRANGER IN 46530 9.30202E+12 LINDA M HOWELL REVOCABLE TRUST 07/02/2021 07/02/2021 378 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 1.60926E+13 LISA J VANDERSTEEN VANDERSTEEN 964 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25126E+12 LITTLE AMERICA HOTEL CORP HOTEL CORP PO BOX 92108 AUSTIN TX 78738 1.61633E+13 LITTLEBERG LLC TLEBERG LLC 2425 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1926 1.61631E+13 LIZ SIANTZ; MARK MCDOWELL (JT) DOWELL (JT)1432 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.29452E+12 LIZABETH O'NAN; SEAN G O'NAN (JT) O'NAN (JT)1460 WOOD ROW WAY WELLINGTON FL 33414 9.30203E+12 LKUT, LLC LKUT, LLC 3944 N 450 W PROVO UT 84604 9.30452E+12 LOLA LIVING TRUST 09/29/2023 09/29/2023 847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3357 9.29327E+12 LORENZO BOTTO & CRISTINA RASPOLLINI REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 4/5/201 729 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 1.6232E+13 LOUIS R BARROWS; ANDREA M BARROWS (JT) ARROWS (JT)2119 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.61631E+13 LUCY ANDERSON; CRISTOFORO FEO (JT) RO FEO (JT)1344 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.6232E+13 LYNN B MABEY YNN B MABEY 2155 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.62333E+13 M IQBAL SIAL IQBAL SIAL 2513 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 9.19451E+12 MACCALL HOLDINGS LLC OLDINGS LLC 185 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1505 9.33403E+12 MADELINE TANK; ERIN MARTIN (JT) MARTIN (JT)1771 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.61413E+13 MADELYN CANNON; RYAN CANNON (JT) CANNON (JT)1529 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2531 9.30376E+12 MANOR HOLDINGS LC HOLDINGS LC PO BOX 755 OREM UT 84059 1.6144E+13 MARC DAVEY REVOCABLE TRUST 07/20/2016 07/20/2016 3081 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 9.29301E+12 MARC ENGELS; REBECCA ENGELS (JT) ENGELS (JT)919 N HILLTOP RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3700 9.30376E+12 MARC WEINREICH TRUST 09/08/2015 09/08/2015 748 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30151E+12 MARIE HYNES SCHULTHIES LIVING TRUST 03/03/2022; RONALD AVON SCHUL 1015 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2218 9.33251E+12 MARILYN D CORBETT N D CORBETT 1590 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 1.6144E+13 MARILYN H PETERSON REVOCABLE TRUST 02/23/1989 02/23/1989 3069 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 1.6144E+13 MARK C MOENCH; MARTHA Y MOENCH (JT) MOENCH (JT)3020 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 9.33202E+12 MARK IRVING SEGAL RVING SEGAL 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.3033E+12 MARK R LEWIS TRUST 05/05/1989; SUSAN H LEWIS TRUST 05/05/1989 05 970 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 9.29301E+12 MARLA A HOLMAN MERRILL MAN MERRILL 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 9.29301E+12 MARLA A HOLMAN MERRILL MAN MERRILL 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 8.25428E+12 MARLON MICHEL RLON MICHEL 36 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 1.61631E+13 MARTHA SHANNON THA SHANNON 1366 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 9.3033E+12 MARVA MATCH LIVING TRUST 06/10/2014 06/10/2014 934 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 MATTHEW B SMITH; CYNTHIA A SMITH (JT) SMITH (JT)910 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.61631E+13 MATTHEW CARDON THEW CARDON 1374 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61413E+13 MATTHEW F KIRK; STEPHANIE B KIRK (JT) B KIRK (JT)1467 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 1.62313E+13 MATTHEW FLATT; WEN YUAN G FLATT (JT) FLATT (JT)2285 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 9.33202E+12 MATTHEW L BARRETT W L BARRETT 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.60933E+13 MATTHEW PARKIN; ANN PARKIN (JT) PARKIN (JT)1553 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 9.28354E+12 MATTHEW PERUN; JAMIE PERUN (JT) PERUN (JT)20 S 200 E # 1 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 2126 9.30201E+12 MATTHEW SCOTT DINGER; LEWIS WONG (JT) S WONG (JT)2961 S TOWER HILL WY WEST VALLEY UT 84120 9.29328E+12 MATTHEW T LYON; BIANCA A LYON (JT) A LYON (JT)968 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.61435E+13 MCKENNA LEVEY REVOCABLE TRUST 04/30/2021 04/30/2021 2005 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 9.29327E+12 MCLESKEY KIVING TRUST 06/04/2015 06/04/2015 800 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.33251E+12 MDK REV TRUST; LK REV TRUST K REV TRUST 1668 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.61431E+13 MELANIE BROWN LYON TRUST 10/16/2014; PAUL DURR LYON TRUST 10/16/2 1785 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30151E+12 MELINDA RIRIE SLIGHTING FAMILY TRUST 02/01/2023 02/01/2023 163 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2261 1.61618E+13 MELISSA A P KRAJESKI P KRAJESKI 1600 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 1.61126E+13 MELISSA CHAN LEWIS; LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 08/29/2022 (SURV) 2022 (SU 3054 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2123 1.61631E+13 MELISSA K LADAKIS A K LADAKIS 1382 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61618E+13 MELVIN NOSANCHUK; PATRICIA A NOSANCHUK (JT) ANCHUK (JT)1646 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 9.30376E+12 MELVIN SMITH; DANIEL PUNT (JT) L PUNT (JT)762 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.33403E+12 MERILYN P HARVEY YN P HARVEY 824 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1338 1.60926E+13 MEYERS & KAPLAN LIVING TRUST 11/05/2018 11/05/2018 944 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60918E+13 MICHAEL & CATHERINE RIDD FAMILY TRUST 07/18/2023 07/18/2023 971 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25428E+12 MICHAEL BALOGH; SUSAN BALOGH (JT) BALOGH (JT)32 W 200 S # 409 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 8.25428E+12 MICHAEL BALOGH; SUSAN E BALOGH (JT) BALOGH (JT)32 W 200 S # 409 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 9.33251E+12 MICHAEL D RASMUSSEN; LISA MARIEL WIRTHLIN (JT) RTHLIN (JT)1628 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 1.61633E+13 MICHAEL DALE JR MILLS E JR MILLS 1532 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.62333E+13 MICHAEL J COOPER EL J COOPER 2455 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 9.29403E+12 MICHAEL P TESKE TRUST 5/25/1994 T 5/25/1994 938 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.62313E+13 MICHAEL S MACKRIS; MEREDITH F MACKRIS (JT) ACKRIS (JT)2215 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 1.61633E+13 MICHAEL WHITE; CHRISOULA ANDREOU (JT) NDREOU (JT)1588 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61438E+13 MICHELLE H BRADSHAW REVOCABLE TRUST 05/19/2022 05/19/2022 2100 S BELAIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1411 1.60933E+13 MIKE YEATES MIKE YEATES 1016 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 1.61438E+13 MING & LIMON CHEN TRUST 11/05/2014 11/05/2014 2079 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 9.28354E+12 MING & LIMON CHEN TRUST 11/05/2014 11/05/2014 2079 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 1.61743E+13 MITCH DAVID WEAVER; FAYE WEAVER FAYE WEAVER 1314 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61138E+13 MITCHELL CURTIS; MAILE CURTIS (JT) CURTIS (JT)2942 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.61138E+13 MJHR TRUST MJHR TRUST 1379 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 1.61635E+13 MOFFETT; DARRYL G MOFFETT (JT) OFFETT (JT)4173 E ABINADI RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 4001 9.30201E+12 MOJABI FAMILY TRUST 09/28/2021 09/28/2021 1012 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 8.25126E+12 MOYLE INVESTMENT LC VESTMENT LC P O BOX 798 VALLEY FORGE PA 19482 8.25126E+12 MOYLE INVESTMENTS LC ESTMENTS LC P O BOX 798 VALLEY FORGE PA 19482 8.25102E+12 MUI INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 892 N COLORADO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 3852 9.30153E+12 MUTSCHELLER FAMILY TRUST 01/15/2020 01/15/2020 29 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 1.61633E+13 NATHAN E DOWLING; MARGARET C SQUIRES (JT) QUIRES (JT)1550 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.60933E+13 NATHAN J MORGAN; KAREN B MORGAN (JT) MORGAN (JT)1529 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61413E+13 NAYER H HONARV REVOCABLE TRUST 12/01/2001 12/01/2001 PO BOX 58742 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 742 9.30101E+12 NEBEKER HOUSE LLC R HOUSE LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 1.60926E+13 NEIL J VICKERS; TANYA M VICKERS (JT) ICKERS (JT)966 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.62333E+13 NHAT NGUYEN; THULAN NGO (JT) AN NGO (JT)2478 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.61631E+13 NICHOLAS & NATALIE NEWMAN TRUST 02/05/2024 02/05/2024 1445 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3736 1.62313E+13 NICHOLAS JAMES DANZIGER; ANNA MCKENZIE WILSON (JT) WILSON (JT)2348 FUNSTON AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 1.61743E+13 NICOLE POULSON; TYLER POULSON (JT) OULSON (JT)1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 8.25428E+12 NICOLOFF FAMILY TRUST 05/12/2008 05/12/2008 913 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2237 9.30151E+12 NINA DE LACY; BRIAN ALLEN DICKINSON (JT) KINSON (JT)1046 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 1.61633E+13 NMOPRO LLC NMOPRO LLC 1267 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2545 9.30203E+12 NORIENE O JEE LIVING TRUST 05/21/2019 05/21/2019 1258 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2246 9.30101E+12 NORTH COVE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 1055 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2243 9.30452E+12 NORTHPOINT ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 798 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3353 1.61013E+13 OBSIDIAN, LLC SIDIAN, LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1619 9.30101E+12 OLIVER LI WEI YEH; ANGELA POON (JT) A POON (JT)1043 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2243 1.60925E+13 OMAR A BARRANI; JON L PENMAN; RHELM B PENMAN (JT) PENMAN (JT)1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 9.29327E+12 OWEN GINTIS OWEN GINTIS 760 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.61418E+13 P T CAMPBELL REVOCABLE TRUST 02/12/2020 02/12/2020 1599 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.6033E+13 PARADIGM RESOURCES LC ESOURCES LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.6033E+13 PARADIGM RESOURCES LC ESOURCES LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 9.31203E+12 PARTICK & NICHOLE PARRISH FAMILY TRUST 06/07/2019 06/07/2019 257 E ELEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2517 1.61635E+13 PATRICK DEPAULIS; TRACIE DEPAULIS (JT) PAULIS (JT)1335 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 9.33403E+12 PAUL M DOUGAN; TERRELL H DOUGAN (JT) DOUGAN (JT)1813 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4493 9.29327E+12 PAUL WINTEROWD L WINTEROWD 697 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61633E+13 PETER & DINA DEWEERD FAMILY TRUST 02/09/2012 02/09/2012 1548 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.61635E+13 PETER FRANCIS TER FRANCIS 1363 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 PETER IDSTROM; JULIE DILLON (JT) DILLON (JT)1635 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 9.29452E+12 PHIL & AUDREY JIRICKO TRUST 09/07/2012 09/07/2012 957 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61625E+13 PHILIP PLUMB; JESSICA S PLUMB (JT) PLUMB (JT)1705 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 9.33126E+12 PHILLIP E BARNETTE & JANET E BARNETTE FAMILY TRUST 12/23/2014 12/1475 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.62333E+13 PHONG NGUYEN; CUC THI NGUYEN (JT) NGUYEN (JT)2498 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 9.29327E+12 PIERO G RUFFINENGO REVOCABLE TRUST 12/18/2007 12/18/2007 820 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.28354E+12 PRESTON CHIARO STON CHIARO 689 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4281 9.33452E+12 PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL NS HOSPITAL PO BOX 3390 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 3390 9.3033E+12 QTIP TRUST UNDER THE CLARENCE T SCHMITZ 05/03/2013; KAROLINE ESTE 946 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 9.30401E+12 R&SK FAM TR R&SK FAM TR 988 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 RA FM TR; CML FAM TRUST L FAM TRUST 904 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60926E+13 RACHEL JACOBS CHEL JACOBS 1702 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1334 9.30426E+12 RAMIRO GARZON MIRO GARZON 479 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 8.25428E+12 RANDAL B & GLORIA L AUSTIN REVOCABLE TRUST 1/31/2002 T 1/31/2002 815 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2285 9.30202E+12 RANDOLPH NELSON; CYNTHIA NELSON (JT) NELSON (JT)350 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 1.60933E+13 RANDY T WESTPAL; DOUGLAS R CHADWICK (JT) ADWICK (JT)1521 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61618E+13 RAY PETER TETREAULT; ANNE WOLFER (JT) WOLFER (JT)2915 MILLCREEK CANYON RD MILLCREEK UT 84109 3107 9.19452E+12 REDOUBT TRUST 06/10/2014 06/10/2014 9161 S BARONAY CIR SANDY UT 84093 3858 1.61438E+13 REIMER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11/24/2002 11/24/2002 1840 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1498 1.6033E+13 RESEARCH PARK ASSOCIATES INC OCIATES INC 10619 S JORDAN GATEWAY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 9.3033E+12 RF TRST RF TRST 906 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 RHETT C EVANS ETT C EVANS 1857 E HARVARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1804 1.61418E+13 RHETT W CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 5185 BRAWNER PL ALEXANDRIA VA 22304 9.33251E+12 RICHARD & BRENDA BROWNTRUST 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 1648 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 1.6094E+13 RICHARD & TANYA JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST 1/3/2024 ST 1/3/2024 994 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60933E+13 RICHARD C JEDRZIEWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/15/2022 06/15/2022 1537 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61633E+13 RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT) W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.31203E+12 RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT) W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 1.61633E+13 RICHARD SPENCE BURDETT; SHARON ANN JENSEN ANN JENSEN 1592 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61633E+13 RIO CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61633E+13 RIO CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 9.30151E+12 RL&JMCR TR RL&JMCR TR 1039 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2248 9.2948E+12 ROBERT & KAREN BURKS REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 9.2948E+12 ROBERT & KAREN BURKS REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 8.25278E+12 ROBERT & TERESA KAY FAMILY TRUST 04/23/2010 04/23/2010 1116 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 1.60933E+13 ROBERT A SPERLING; JULIE A SPERLING (JT) ERLING (JT)1020 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 9.30202E+12 ROBERT C COSBY; MARY M COSBY (JT) COSBY (JT)302 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 9.30376E+12 ROBERT FOGARTY ERT FOGARTY 776 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30454E+12 ROBERT RYAN RICHARDS; MARTINA WRIGHT RICHARDS (JT) CHARDS (JT)343 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5201 9.30152E+12 ROBERT S WARD; RUTH M INDAHYUNG (JT) AHYUNG (JT)166 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2260 9.29176E+12 ROBERT Z TASHJIAN; SARAH MAJERCIK (JT) JERCIK (JT)1036 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 9.31203E+12 ROBIN & JANE KIM FAMILY TRUST 10/09/2020 10/09/2020 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.29403E+12 ROBIN DUNLEAVY IN DUNLEAVY 930 E NORTHVALE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4013 9.29403E+12 ROBIN DUNLEAVY IN DUNLEAVY 930 E NORTHVALE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4013 1.60925E+13 ROBYN G CRAIG; BRENT H CRAIG (JT) CRAIG (JT)855 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 1.6033E+13 ROCKWELL COLLINS SIMULATION & TRAINING SOLUTIONS LLC LUTIONS LLC 400 COLLINS RD NE CEDAR RAPIDS IA 52498 1.6144E+13 ROGER & ANNE WALTHER REVOCABLE TRUST 3/31/1992 T 3/31/1992 3636 BUCHANAN ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 1709 1.6144E+13 ROGER & ANNE WALTHER REVOCABLE TRUST 03/31/1992 03/31/1992 3636 BUCHANAN ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 1709 9.3033E+12 ROGER & PAULA EVERSHED LIVING TRUST 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 3772 W SAND HILL CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 8713 9.30153E+12 ROGER K HOBBS REVOCABLE TRUST 03/11/2022; DENISE C HOBBS REVOCABL 41 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.30452E+12 ROLAND K BARBERO & CASSANDRA E BARBERO LIVING TRUST 01/26/2016 01 789 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3358 9.33251E+12 RONALD SOREN HANSON TRUST FBO FAMILY TRUST 11/21/2019; SHIRLEY HA 1548 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 1.61636E+13 ROSE FRANCIS; NATHAN ANDREW BRAIN (JT) BRAIN (JT)1421 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61413E+13 ROXANNE BARTEL; DANIELA SOLZBACHER (JT) BACHER (JT)1497 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 1.61438E+13 ROY BLOEBAUM FAMILY TRUST 08/31/201 T 08/31/201 2052 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1486 1.6144E+13 RUDY GOBERT RUDY GOBERT 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61743E+13 RUSS L ISENBURG; ANN MARIE ISENBURG (JT) ENBURG (JT)1303 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 RWD TRUST RWD TRUST 1564 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.60925E+13 RYAN H SAVAGE; JULIE E SAVAGE (JT) SAVAGE (JT)1707 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 9.30376E+12 RYAN P LOWDER AN P LOWDER 704 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30376E+12 RYAN STEVEN GOODWIN VEN GOODWIN 710 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 1.61413E+13 S CHRISTOPHER CLARK FAMILY TRUST 06/7/2011; JAMIE T CLARK FAMILY 1409 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 1.61633E+13 S JOHN WEBBER; J&DWT BBER; J&DWT 3553 E SUTTON CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6150 9.30201E+12 S RAY, LLC S RAY, LLC 170 W 400 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 1.6112E+13 SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 5460 1.61625E+13 SALT LAKE COUNTY LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 4575 9.29403E+12 SAMUEL & DIANE STEWART FAMILY TRUST 03/19/2019 03/19/2019 269 N A ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2511 9.30427E+12 SARA M LENHERR; SCOTT R MILLER (JT) MILLER (JT)569 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 9.29326E+12 SARAH CHILDS; STUART CHILDS (JT) CHILDS (JT)997 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4028 1.61433E+13 SARAH DEVOLL REVOCABLE TRUST 07/13/2020 07/13/2020 1725 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30454E+12 SCHMIDT FAMILY LIVING TRUST 5/8/2014 ST 5/8/2014 344 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5205 1.61633E+13 SCHRIBER-KHAN FAMILY 2005 TRUST 08/31/2005 08/31/2005 3451 N WINDRIVER CT EDEN UT 84310 9549 9.33126E+12 SCHWARTZ-GARTRELL FAMILY TRUST 06/04/1997 06/04/1997 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.61435E+13 SCOTT & ANNETTE TURVILLE FAMILY TRUST 09/21/1989 09/21/1989 3812 S HONEYCUT RD MILLCREEK UT 84106 3820 9.33401E+12 SCOTT & JENNIFER TRUST 05/23/2024 05/23/2024 333 N FEDERAL HEIGHTS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4440 8.25428E+12 SCOTT CONWAY 2012 GIFT TRUST 12/11/2012 12/11/2012 843 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2285 1.6144E+13 SCOTT PELICHOFF; LYNN PELICHOFF (JT) ICHOFF (JT)3173 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61413E+13 SES 147, LLC ES 147, LLC 111 E BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 5225 9.32202E+12 SG REVOC TRUST; OPG REVOC TRUST REVOC TRUST 693 N NORTHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4053 8.25102E+12 SHACKLETON'S ENDURANCE, LLC URANCE, LLC 2471 S 150 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 8.25126E+12 SHACKLETON'S ENDURANCE, LLC URANCE, LLC 2471 S 150 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 1.61435E+13 SHANON K BERGMAN; M GREG BERGMANN (JT) RGMANN (JT)2025 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61435E+13 SHANON K BERGMAN; M GREG BERGMANN (JT) RGMANN (JT)2025 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61743E+13 SHARRON B BARNUM TRUST 06/14/2023 06/14/2023 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 1.60926E+13 SHEILA PAGE; MICHAEL A COX (JT) A COX (JT)913 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25428E+12 SHELDON J WILLIAMS; JANET C WILLIAMS (JT) LLIAMS (JT)941 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2237 1.61621E+13 SHELLEY L JARRARD; HELEN A REYNOLDS (JT) YNOLDS (JT)1751 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 9.32229E+12 SHUBELLA-ZUTI FAMILY TRUST 12/20/2000 12/20/2000 696 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4042 9.29452E+12 SHUI CHIN CHAN I CHIN CHAN 975 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 8.25126E+12 SINCLAIR TRANSPORTATION COMPANY ION COMPANY PO BOX 92108 AUSTIN TX 78709 9.33251E+12 SIRIUS CAPITAL LLC CAPITAL LLC 1973 W GRAYHAWK CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 1.6114E+13 SJG FAM TRUST; MCG FAM TRUST G FAM TRUST 3020 E CHAUCER PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2504 9.30203E+12 SLH TRUST 02/12/1999 02/12/1999 407 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2256 8.243E+12 SOSSIHAUS5, LLC IHAUS5, LLC 3350 S 2940 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3136 8.243E+12 SOSSIHAUS5, LLC IHAUS5, LLC 3350 S 2940 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3136 9.33403E+12 SRINIVASAN FAMILY TRUST 07/29/2021 07/29/2021 1793 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.61438E+13 SRINIVASAN GOVINDARAJAN; SUJATHA SAMPATH (JT) AMPATH (JT)2080 S BELAIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1409 8.23226E+12 STAKER & PARSON COMPANIES N COMPANIES 2350 S 1900 W # 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 9.30176E+12 STANFORD P FITTS; MELANIE H FITTS (JT) FITTS (JT)209 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2261 1.6111E+13 STATE OF UTAH DIV OF PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION PO BOX 146001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 6001 1.61438E+13 STAVROS G DRAKOS; ALIKI C MILIOTI (JT) ILIOTI (JT)1865 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 1.60926E+13 STEPHANIE Z KLEIN NIE Z KLEIN 976 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25278E+12 STEPHEN BACH; PATRICE BACH (JT) E BACH (JT)1121 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.60933E+13 STEPHEN GLENN SENINGER REOVACBLE TRUST 04/22/2002; KATHRYN J SENI 1561 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61438E+13 STEPHEN J CARSON; POOK R CARSON (JT) CARSON (JT)2087 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 1.61431E+13 STEPHEN KENT BRADLEY; BARRY FRANSON (JT) RANSON (JT)1795 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30101E+12 STEPHEN L MANNSCHRECK; MARIAN J MANNSCHRECK (JT) CHRECK (JT)1261 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2254 9.33201E+12 STEPHEN M HARMSEN; KELLY HARMSEN (JT) ARMSEN (JT)1616 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4257 8.25276E+12 STEPHEN S REVOC TRUST; STEPHANIE S REVOC TRUST REVOC TRUST 11 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 1.61141E+13 STEVE J GOORMAN; CHRISTA ZARO (JT) A ZARO (JT)3017 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 8.25278E+12 STEVE RAGSDALE; NAOMI RAGSDALE (JT) GSDALE (JT)14874 S VILLAGE VISTA DR DRAPER UT 84020 5563 8.25278E+12 STEVEN & DEBORAH TUTTLE TRUST 04/22/2024 04/22/2024 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25278E+12 STEVEN & DEBORAH TUTTLE TRUST 04/22/2024 04/22/2024 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.6144E+13 STEVEN A BURGESS N A BURGESS 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1475 1.62333E+13 STEVEN K WALKER; SHERRY L WALKER (JT) WALKER (JT)2452 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.60918E+13 STEVEN L LONG & LISA L LONG FAMILY TRUST 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1712 1.61433E+13 STEVEN SKAAR TEVEN SKAAR 9846 E EMERALD DR SUN LAKES AZ 85248 9.29452E+12 STEVEN W ALLRED EN W ALLRED 1007 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.29328E+12 STEVENS LIVING TRUST 01/06/2015 01/06/2015 1020 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 1.61413E+13 STEWART OGDEN; JOAN P OGDEN (JT) OGDEN (JT)1423 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 1.61141E+13 STL IRR TRUST L IRR TRUST 3014 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2519 1.61438E+13 STRALEY FAMILY TRUST 12/28/2011 12/28/2011 3536 E MONZA DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 3829 9.32202E+12 SUNDANCE 2012 IRREVOCABLE CHILDREN'S TRUST I 12/03/2012 12/03/201 1045 QUARRY MOUNTAIN LN PARK CITY UT 84098 9.33251E+12 SUSA DAWSON FAMILY TRUST 07/15/1998 07/15/1998 1654 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.62333E+13 SVKL TR SVKL TR 2423 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TR AGREE; EBC 1998 TR AGREE 98 TR AGREE 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TRUST; EBC 1998 TRUST 1998 TRUST 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TRUST; EBC 1998 TRUST 1998 TRUST 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 9.19451E+12 SYNTAX INVESTMENTS LC ESTMENTS LC PO BOX 540478 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 9.29452E+12 T H S C JR FM TR; T P K S C FM TR K S C FM TR 999 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61418E+13 T&CD LIV TR T&CD LIV TR 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.61126E+13 TAG SLC, LLC AG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 697 8.25428E+12 TAMI W MARQUARDT TRUST 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 42 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 9.28351E+12 TAMIKO A LONG MIKO A LONG 609 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 1.61618E+13 TAMSIN E STONE SIN E STONE 1625 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 9.33126E+12 TARA ROSEN; PAUL ROSEN (JT) ROSEN (JT)1527 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.60926E+13 TC TRUST 05/29/2024 05/29/2024 927 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60926E+13 TCD PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 3640 JOHNSTON WY NE NORTH LIBERTY IA 52317 1.6112E+13 TEANCUM PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.61126E+13 TEANCUM PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.60926E+13 TERESA BRAMWELL SA BRAMWELL 923 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61633E+13 TERRI HUGHES; IAN HUGHES (JT) HUGHES (JT)1522 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61413E+13 THE BAE FAMILY TRUST 07/10/2019 07/10/2019 1479 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 9.33202E+12 THE MARK DODSON & JAMIE ZUSSMAN TRUST 06/25/2019 06/25/2019 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 THE MARK DODSON & JAMIE ZUSSMAN TRUST 06/25/2019 06/25/2019 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.6034E+13 THERA TECH THERA TECH 400 INTERPACE PKWY PARSIPPANY NJ 7054 1120 1.61418E+13 THOMAS & CANDACE DEE LIVING TRUST 08/27/2010 08/27/2010 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 9.30427E+12 THOMAS B PILGER AS B PILGER 545 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.60926E+13 THOMAS G RICHMOND; CYNTHIA SQUIRE (JT) SQUIRE (JT)928 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25278E+12 THOMAS K CARLIN REVOCABLE TRUST 10/08/2018; ASHLEY A CARLIN REVOC 1102 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 9.33251E+12 THOMAS M BONACCI; KRISTIN S BONACCI (JT) ONACCI (JT)1024 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1641 9.33126E+12 THOMAS M BROOKS; CARRIE L BROOKS (TC) BROOKS (TC)1489 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33126E+12 THOMAS M. BROOKS S M. BROOKS 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.6114E+13 THOMAS R GRANT; SUZANNE T GRANT (JT) GRANT (JT)3025 E DICKENS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2505 9.30153E+12 TIAUNA MADISON SCOTT ROEMER; ZACHARY KEITH SCOTT ROEMER (JT) ROEM 989 N ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2265 1.61636E+13 TIFFANY W PETERSON W PETERSON 1441 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 9.30176E+12 TIMOTHY B HUFFAKER; MARGARET M HUFFAKER (JT) FFAKER (JT)693 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2140 9.30427E+12 TIMOTHY WATCKE OTHY WATCKE 529 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 9.3033E+12 TOM KEENAN TOM KEENAN 960 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.61633E+13 TRAVIS LONG; JULIANA GROSCOST (JT) OSCOST (JT)1504 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 8.25278E+12 TRISTAN BRUNIER MELE RUNIER MELE 1135 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25428E+12 TRUONG PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 1559 W 3860 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 6291 1.61621E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1759 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1614 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2662 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1709 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1749 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61633E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1516 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61635E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1357 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61636E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1427 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.60918E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 965 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60918E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 963 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60925E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 1.60925E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1583 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1583 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1601 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1619 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1635 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1030 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 1.61431E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 5912 RAPHAEL DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1961 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1985 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2015 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2084 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1870 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1498 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2857 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2857 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1835 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1849 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 9.30101E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1233 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2254 9.30202E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 355 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2252 9.3033E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 856 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.3033E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 846 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.30376E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 790 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.31126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 643 E SIXTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3704 1.6232E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 812 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 1832 1.6114E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3021 E SHAKESPEARE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2514 1.61141E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3370 W 500 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 4402 1.61141E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3020 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2519 1.61418E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1663 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61418E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1615 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1755 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.28352E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 9.33101E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 529 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED PO BOX 58248 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 248 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33251E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 9.33251E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 9.33403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1757 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 9.29327E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 810 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 958 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29452E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1043 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 451 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3125 E KENNEDY DR # 102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2169 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 469 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30452E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3357 9.32229E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 690 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4042 1.61631E+13 TYLER R ANDERSON R ANDERSON 1440 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 1.61743E+13 TYLER R KEARN LER R KEARN 1 ARBOR ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94131 1.61013E+13 UNITED STATES (MILITARY RESERVE FT DOUGLAS) FT DOUGLAS)7500 E 53RD PL # 1108 DENVER CO 80266 9918 1.6031E+13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF AMERICA 125 S STATE ST # 8100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84138 1147 1.6034E+13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF AMERICA 125 S STATE ST # 8100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84138 1147 1.61013E+13 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ITY OF UTAH 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1619 1.6031E+13 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOUNDATION 303 S CHIPETA WY # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.6034E+13 UTAH STATE DIVISION OF PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION PO BOX 146301 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 6301 9.29327E+12 VALHALLA INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 711 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 1.60926E+13 VALORIE J PARKER LIVING TRUST 11/04/2024 11/04/2024 922 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.31203E+12 VANESSA INEZ PAYNE TRUST 02/28/2023 02/28/2023 315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5209 1.61126E+13 VENGATA C CHINNATHAMBI; VINODHINI KOLANDAVELU (TC) DAVELU (TC)3125 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2124 9.33104E+12 VFB TRUST VFB TRUST 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 9.32202E+12 VGC TRUST VGC TRUST 602 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4033 8.25126E+12 VICTORY STORAGE LLC STORAGE LLC 915 PLUM CT NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 9.31203E+12 VILLAR JOINT FAMILY TRUST 03/25/2013 03/25/2013 290 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2857 9.30176E+12 VITAMIN Q CAPITAL SERIES D LLC ERIES D LLC 1034 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 1.61433E+13 VON WHITBY VON WHITBY 1739 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.31203E+12 W SCOTT & KATHY TENNEY LIVING TRUST 4/2/2025 ST 4/2/2025 346 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5201 1.6033E+13 WAKARA LC WAKARA LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.61625E+13 WASATCH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH RIAN CHURCH 1626 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2662 1.61013E+13 WASATCH RESEARCH PARK, LLC H PARK, LLC 299 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1941 1.6034E+13 WATSON LABORATORIES ABORATORIES 400 INTERPACE PKWY PARSIPPANY NJ 7054 1120 9.19451E+12 WAYNE & LESLEY WEBSTER LIVING TRUST 11/05/2021 11/05/2021 429 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 1.61618E+13 WAYSON D WIGHT; SABRINA B WIGHT (JT) WIGHT (JT)1640 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 9.19476E+12 WEIBO CHENG; YONGGANG ZHANG (JT) ZHANG (JT)1334 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2283 9.2948E+12 WESLEY B LARSEN; ROBIN C LARSEN (JT) LARSEN (JT)1149 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 9.30376E+12 WESLEY ROBERT WHITE REVOCABLE TRUST 08/28/1975; CONSTANCE B WHITE 804 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.29327E+12 WGG TRUST WGG TRUST 657 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61618E+13 WILEY & CHRISTINA THUET FAMILY TRUST 10/13/2017 10/13/2017 1597 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.29452E+12 WILLIAM A PAULOS FAMILY TRUST 04/30/2021; JULIE S PAULOS FAMILY T 987 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.60926E+13 WILLIAM J EVANS; JEAN M EVANS (JT) EVANS (JT)968 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30201E+12 WILLIAM J FAIR; KARI M FAIR (JT) M FAIR (JT)1066 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 8.25276E+12 WILLIAM S CAMPBELL TRUST 08/28/2018 08/28/2018 15 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.28351E+12 WILLIAM T COULDWELL; MARIE F COULDWELL (JT) LDWELL (JT)643 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 9.32202E+12 WILMA S LIVSEY TRUST 11/06/2023 11/06/2023 925 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4206 1.6033E+13 WOODFIRE L.L.C DFIRE L.L.C 303 S CHIPETA WY # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.61418E+13 YIHUI PAN; CHUNMING CHEN (JT) G CHEN (JT)1589 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.62333E+13 YURI BAE CHAN TRUST 12/20/2019 12/20/2019 2486 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.62333E+13 ZENON BABIAK; MARY TETER BABIAK (JT) BABIAK (JT)2167 HUNTINGDON RD HUNTINGDON VALLEY PA 19006 1.61743E+13 ZYANYA BEJARANO; MATTHEW TOWLE (JT) TOWLE (JT)1310 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 This page has intentionally been left blank 6. Original Petition SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM To: Cc: From: Date: Re: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Tammy Hunsaker, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director; Mark Kittrell, City Attorney; Chief Karl L b and Chief Tony Allred, Fire Department; Troy Anderson, Building Official. Nick Norris, Planning Director June 17, 2025 Initiation of a text amendment to adopt the Urban Wildfire Interface (UWI) Fire Code adopted by the Utah Legislature and an Urban Wildfire Interface Zoning Overlay that would identify where the UWI code would apply. In coordination with the Fire Department and Building Services, the Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a text amendment to the city code that would adopt the version of the Urban Wildfire Interface Fire Code adopted by the Utah Legislature and adopt a zoning overlay that will indicate on the zoning map where the UWI code would apply. The map proposed by the Fire Department is attached. The code would apply to the foothill areas, along stream and river corridors, and next to other natural areas in the Northwest Quadrant and north of the Salt Lake International Airport. The proposal will go through the typical public engagement process, with a minimum of 45-days public input period with notice to all recognized organizations and the division’s email distribution list. It is anticipated that the planning commission will hold a public hearing in late summer, and the item will then be transmitted to the City Council for a decision. Utah Code adopted legislation that goes into effect on January 1, 2026 and requires cities to adopt the UWI code by that date. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is not to initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at 801-535-6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. ______________________________________ _________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/10/2025 Date Sent To Council: 09/15/2025 From: Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Transportation Advisory Board Recommendation: The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Brian Conley to the Transportation Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent and ending on the last Monday in September. Brian Conley currently lives in District 5. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/29/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/01/2025 From: Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: City and County Building Conservancy and Use Committee Recommendation: The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Nick Pedersen to the City and County Building Conservancy and Use Committee for a 4 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent and ending on the third Monday in July. Nick Pedersen currently lives in District 2. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/06/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/06/2025 From: Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Art Design Board Recommendation: The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Amanda Stewart to the Art Design Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Amanda Stewart currently lives in District 7. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/06/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/10/2025 From: Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Historic Landmark Commission Recommendation: The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Taymour Semnani to the Historic Landmark Commission for a 4 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Taymour Semnani currently lives in District 4. Approved:* Otto, Rachel Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/9/2025 9:55 Jennifer Madrigal High school in Glendale I'm doing my duty to amplify the desire of many of us on the Westside to have the city support a High School in Glendale. Our kids deserve the chance a local high school will give them. Prompt attention to removing the East West divide is also appreciated. 10/9/2025 10:03 Dorothy Pappas Owen Homeless Campus Request that the City ask the State Homeless Council to put their feasibility study on the homeless campus on their website. Also, all cost information should be posted. This was done when the state prison site was being evaluated a comparison of all potential prison sites was conducted evaluated against specific criteria. A similar report should be done on the homeless campus so citizens understand why the 2200 west site was selected. 10/9/2025 13:16 Rosario Vargas Recent flooding How is the City going to respond to the negligence on the recent flooding by the sewer canal? How are they going to compensate residents? 10/9/2025 13:49 Holly B Stuart Protect butterflies, salamanders, and fireflies in fall and winter Please lift or modify any existing ordinances and/or regulations that require the removal of fallen leaves from residential and commercial landscapes, including outdoor public spaces in our community. What we do with fallen leaves in the fall in our community can have huge impacts on wildlife in the spring. When leaves are collected and thrown away or sent to the landfill in the fall, we eliminate an important overwintering microhabitat for caterpillars, salamanders, fireflies and other local wildlife in addition to disrupting the ecosystem. Have you ever wondered where butterflies go in winter? The answer is right underfoot. Butterflies and moths may overwinter in the leaves as caterpillars, chrysalises, or even in their adult forms, depending on the species. When leaves are raked into a yard waste bag, up to 45% of a yard’s butterflies are thrown away! According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency leaves and other yard debris account for more than 12 percent of the nation’s solid waste—with more than a whopping 10 million tons buried in landfills every year. Without enough oxygen to decompose, this organic matter releases the greenhouse gas methane into our atmosphere. Fallen leaves can be moved from turf areas to appropriate garden beds and around the bases of trees to create a three to five inches deep natural mulch where wildlife can overwinter and plants can benefit from their nutrients. Or they can be composted and returned to help build our soils. Thank you for taking action to make sure our local ordinances and/or regulations do not prohibit us from leaving the leaves when they fall in residential and commercial landscapes and in public outdoor spaces, but are used to provide habitat for local wildlife and do not end up in the landfill. Sincerely, Holly Stuart Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/9/2025 13:52 Lise Fischer I’m counting on you to safeguard vital leaf habitat Please lift or modify any existing ordinances and/or regulations that require the removal of fallen leaves from residential and commercial landscapes, including outdoor public spaces in our community. What we do with fallen leaves in the fall in our community can have huge impacts on wildlife in the spring. When leaves are collected and thrown away or sent to the landfill in the fall, we eliminate an important overwintering microhabitat for caterpillars, salamanders, fireflies and other local wildlife in addition to disrupting the ecosystem. Have you ever wondered where butterflies go in winter? The answer is right underfoot. Butterflies and moths may overwinter in the leaves as caterpillars, chrysalises, or even in their adult forms, depending on the species. When leaves are raked into a yard waste bag, up to 45% of a yard’s butterflies are thrown away! According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency leaves and other yard debris account for more than 12 percent of the nation’s solid waste—with more than a whopping 10 million tons buried in landfills every year. Without enough oxygen to decompose, this organic matter releases the greenhouse gas methane into our atmosphere. Fallen leaves can be moved from turf areas to appropriate garden beds and around the bases of trees to create a three to five inches deep natural mulch where wildlife can overwinter and plants can benefit from their nutrients. Or they can be composted and returned to help build our soils. Thank you for taking action to make sure our local ordinances and/or regulations do not prohibit us from leaving the leaves when they fall in residential and commercial landscapes and in public outdoor spaces, but are used to provide habitat for local wildlife and do not end up in the landfill. Sincerely, Lise Fischer 10/10/2025 8:47 Nancy Walker Recycling Years ago, an overflowing garbage can was the sign of a prosperous family that could afford to buy lots of stuff and throw half of it away. Times change. Our own garbage can was only half full after we started recycling cans, cardboard and milk jugs. We felt good about it. Now I think about my children, living in townhouses and apartment complexes with only one big dumpster for trash. No separation of aluminum from orange peels or office paper from doggie chews or soda bottles from dust bunnies. So sad! Could our city offer recycling containers to each complex? Not all people would use them, but many folks are more aware and responsible to the environment and would willingly sort their trash as "reusable" or "done with it." Thanks for reading. This city is wonderful! 10/10/2025 11:25 Patrice Isabella Salt Lake City Sports Complex parking Patrice Isabella, a frequent patron of the Salt Lake City Sports Complex, expressed frustration with limited parking at the facility due to student use. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/10/2025 13:56 Chris Souther Re: Complaint under Utah Open & Public Meetings Act – alleged improper meeting practices re: site selection for 2520 N 2200 W I am a resident of the area near the parcel at 2520 N 2200 W, Salt Lake City, and I write to formally lodge a complaint under the Utah Open & Public Meetings Act (Title 52, Chapter 4) regarding the decision-making and meeting processes related to the proposed homeless campus at that site. I believe the following violations may have occurred: 1. Lack of adequate public notice The public was not given 24 hours’ notice (or sufficient written notice including agenda, time, place) concerning certain meetings in which the parcel or site selection was discussed. I and other neighbors were not informed or given opportunity to attend or comment on critical deliberations. 2. Improper closure of meetings / deliberations in private If portions of meetings concerning evaluation, selection, funding, or acquisition of property were closed to the public without proper justification (statutory exceptions), that may violate OPMA. If meeting minutes or recordings do not fully reflect the portions closed (or were not recorded), that is also potentially in violation. 3. Decisions or binding actions taken in closed / nonpublic settings If any formal site approval, contract, or directive was approved during a closed session without first being publicly deliberated or without proper motion and vote in an open session, those decisions may be voidable. 4. Conflict of interest with senior board member Wayne Neiderhouser. No one making land purchase decisions for the state or city should have business dealings, current or past, in land development and/or sales. It is a direct conflict of interest and these members should be investigated into whether or not their conflicts influenced their decisions. I request that your offices: Review whether public bodies involved (Utah Homeless Services Board / related state agency / city officials) have complied with OPMA in all meetings where this parcel or homeless campus project was discussed or decided. Require corrective action, including reopening or redoing portions of decision processes in compliance with OPMA if violations are found. Provide me with a written response regarding your findings and any actions you take. If necessary, I can provide evidence of meeting dates, notices (or lack thereof), news articles, or statements from neighbors showing when and how the project was revealed without adequate public engagement, but it has been all over the news and I am sure you are aware. Please include me in correspondence about your investigation and provide me with a timeline of any planned review. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Chris Souther 10/13/2025 11:19 Taylor Thurman Phone call to City Council Caller would like to speak to Council Member Puy about the railroad crossings and noise issues on the Westside. 10/14/2025 13:20 Dwight Barrett Fire Station on 1300 South Main Good evening. I do hope all is well with you. The fire department located at this location once again drove through my neighborhood last night around 11:15 and blew the horn on the fire truck. Are you ever going to fire the person who continues to disturb the people in this neighborhood? I am tired of being awaken by the fireman who has an out of control fetish of blowing his horn to wake people up. Please put a stop to this. Dwight J Barrett 10/15/2025 16:27 Mary Lee Walton The Great Salt Lake Working to save the Great Salt Lake is so important. If we don't do that, all the other good things won't matter. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/15/2025 16:30 Flower Murphy Concern About Development at 560 W 200 S Hello Council Member, My name is Murphy, and I live on 200 S. I’m writing because the building next to my apartment at 560 W 200 S is being demolished and replaced with a seven-story apartment building. The view and sunlight from my apartment was a major factor in choosing this home, and this development will drastically impact my living conditions and quality of life, and my cats' too. I understand the appeal period for the building permit has passed, but I’m asking for your support to mitigate the impact on residents... for example, through design adjustments, visual buffers, or other measures that preserve light, openness, or neighborhood character. is there anything we can do to make sure it doesn't tower over the neighbourhood? I didn't even know this was happening until my whole building started shaking from the demolition next-door. We have one window, and our lives revolve around it. My cats want to bask in the Sun all day every day and it provides light for our home, and we can see the beautiful mountains. The last 10 years we've moved five different times around Salt Lake Valley trying to find a place that feels like home, and we finally found it here. this is my home, it is safe and beautiful to me. And if this building project goes through without any modifications, it will forever change my home in a way that I never agreed to and was unaware was happening. ( I also would like to mention that adding an entire apartment building full of people and families and their cars, there's going to be absolutely nowhere to park as this neighbourhood is already way past capacity for cars. ) i've reached out to all the avenues that I can and you're my last hope. please tell me there's something you can do...? Thank you very much for your time and attention. I would greatly appreciate any guidance or advocacy you can provide. Sincerely, Murphy 10/16/2025 14:12 Chad Taylor Unsustainable use of housing support funds I am a landlord. I often get applicants who have just been awarded thousands of dollars in support of their housing. They still have the addictions, mental health problems, lack of education, etc...that caused their problem but they have a huge lump of cash to spend on getting housing. THIS IS DESTRUCTIVE! STOP giving someone with no skin in the game government cash to spend. They weren't responsible with their own cash and now they are using government cash to get an apartment they can't keep in 6 months. DUMB and unsustainable. Instead, help them live within their means. Charge them $3/day to live in the shelter. Unpleasant conditions make humans learn and change. Make sure the shelters are more uncomfortable than prison. These people CAN pull themselves up if we give them good boundaries, leadership and a therapist. 10/16/2025 14:54 Tonya Deal Housing In the news they talk about how new housing is coming available. But has anyone looked at the rates? One bedroom starting at $1,200 and up. Maybe because they are new, higher rates but for those of us who work and have family, that is really high and very discouraging. It is not 'affordable' housing. 10/16/2025 16:45 Jacob Tucker Treatment of the unhoused during winter Hello, As we get into the colder winter months the challenges for the unhoused in our community intensify. My main concern is how they're treated by police. I do volunteer work feeding the unhoused as well as providing various survival supplies. Part of that is also just talking to them and listening to their experiences. One man told me recently that last winter he had a battery operated thermal heater that a policeman repeatedly kicked and eventually crushed with his boot. While I understand the need to monitor the activities of the unhoused in our community and intervene when necessary, I don't understand this type of tactic. It's just cruel. Do the police think that by destroying the items that help them, they are somehow going to be motivated to become housed? There are ways to keep our neighborhoods and parks safe while preserving the dignity of those unhoused. I don't have all the answers but I think that there should be procedures that the police should have to follow when addressing the unhoused that show some compassion. I'm hopeful that with new housing opportunities coming up around the city that police can professionally direct the unhoused to those resources without harming them in the process. Thank you, Jacob Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/16/2025 16:50 Syed RAHMAN Sprinklers on Pedestrian Walkways Hello, I walk around downtown and the Liberty Park area a lot. I've noticed that most sprinkler systems have been set up with no respect for pedestrians using the walkways. They drench the sidewalks and force the pedestrians to use the roads during their walks. This is dangerous as it increases the chances of getting hit by a car. Can you please try and fix this somehow? I must commend a number of Apartment Complexes that set up their sprinkler systems, to not drench the sidewalks and still water their grass. So, it's very possible to do, if someone is being mindful. Thanks, Syed Mujibur Rahman 84111 10/16/2025 16:52 James Ogilvie new expenditures Traffic safety is a great concern: speeding, reckless driving, DWI, running stop signs, distracted driving, road rage. The death toll is unacceptable. Drivers have been educated that bad driving has no consequences. More and more visible police presence will reduce the problem. James Ogilvie SLC 10/17/2025 12:16 Natalie Merz Phone call to City Council D7 constituent Natalie Merz is calling and asked to speak to Sarah regarding the traffic issue on 2100 S and the Chick-fil-A area. She contacted the Mayor's Office, and they referred her to call us and talk to her CM. Natlie is concerned with the long line queuing in the street. She counted up to 15 before she called our office. She is wondering what can be done to keep traffic flowing in this lane versus idling vehicles. 10/17/2025 13:14 Dave Iltis This is the Place Park Connector Pathway from Sunnyside to Research Park Needs to Be Opened to People on Bikes and Foot ASAP Dave Iltis is requesting that the path connecting This is the Place State Park and Research Park be opened up for pedestrian and bicycle access. 10/17/2025 14:16 Keri Holland Urgent Issue with Rocky Mountain Power Dear Salt Lake City Council Members, I am writing to seek your immediate help and intervention regarding a deeply distressing situation with Rocky Mountain Power. Just recently, the company replaced a small wooden power line in front of my home at REDACTED with an extremely large metal power line—one that is significantly larger, taller, and more intrusive. The diameter of the metal power line is 3-4 feet alone and it is twice the height of the existing power line and at least 6-7 times the width. This installation has drastically reduced my property’s value in an instant and has caused me immense stress. I’ve been in the real estate industry for 20 years and my property values have dropped now between 500,000 to 750,000 with this powerline change within a single day. I have already contacted Rocky Mountain Power’s customer service and filed a claim, but I am extremely concerned that this issue will not be addressed in a timely or fair manner without the City’s support. Given the placement of the line on the strip of lawn between the sidewalk and the street, it’s unclear to me what my exact rights are, but the impact on my property is undeniable and this strip is directly in front of my home and land that I maintain. This type of powerline does not belong in a suburban neighborhood and I have not seen one powerline of this magnitude in any suburban neighborhood in Salt Lake City, except for now in my front yard, which is just a block from The Capitol. I am urgently requesting your assistance in intervening on my behalf and helping me find a resolution. I fear that without the City’s involvement, I will face a long and costly battle that I am desperate to avoid that will get me nowhere. I have been a real estate agent for developers fighting Rocky Mountain Power before, and I know it is near impossible to make any headway with them on my own. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. I would be grateful for any guidance or action you can take to help resolve this situation swiftly. Sincerely, Keri Holland 10/20/2025 16:41 Merle French Federal funds How exactly has the city helped the homeless with federal funds? I don't see affordable housing..where is it located? I just see unaffordable apartments going up everywhere. What is the city doing about the RV's parked everywhere? Do you know that a good percentage are mobile drug labs? What about safe parking for these vehicles? And those living in their cars? Im not impressed with the city's response to homelessness, or the failure of your agent on this to respond to emails. How about some itemized receipts on exactly where federal funds are being used? Merle French Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/20/2025 16:43 Jim Jenkin Follow-up to previous Work Session on RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District. Council Comments, Jim Jenkins 20 October, 2025 Re: Follow-up to previous Work Session on RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District. The proposal was presented in a positive light by Planning staff at the October 7th Working Session, however I still oppose this proposal as written due to provisions destructive to Local Historic Districts and to established neighborhood character. 1. 2. The 3. current setbacks of the RMF 35 zoning and SR-1A Zoning in the Avenues are essential to the development and protection of the existing character of the neighborhood. They promote significant tree coverage on private property as well as in the park strip. 4. This tree coverage creates natural cooling, superior walkability and the neighborliness that characterizes local historic districts. The proposed setback reductions are therefore a direct threat to the character of the neighborhood. Maintaining the existing 5. neighborhood character is prioritized in multiple planning documents, including the preamble to this effort. 6. I further note that, of the three example slides in the Planning presentation of existing single family residential adjacent to multifamily buildings, none seemed to include four foot setbacks. In one example a multi-unit apartment building had been constructed with its driveway directly adjacent to a zero lot line historic home. This is exactly the kind of development that the existing Zoning was placed to prevent. 2. 3. The 4. current proposal limits mandatory setback and step-back protections to Historic Registry properties, which are a limited species typified by an owner discretionary application process. Local historic districts are made up of significant and contributory properties 5. defined and regulated by City Code. The protection of only registry properties from height and proximity encroachment is antagonistic to Local Historic Districts and neighborhood character. 6. 3. 4. Planning 5. staff contends that review by the Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) of construction in Local Historic Districts is sufficient to protect contributory structures and the character of local historic districts. However, multiple observers have concluded 6. that, while the HLC is proficient in protecting the character of contributory structures where the permit involves the contributory structure itself, HLC generally permits non-contributory structure construction at the limits of the existing Zone. I contacted 7. a former member of the HLC to check the validity of this viewpoint and they considered it accurate. In addition, many applications involving non-contributory structures are approved administratively at the staff level and never make it to the historic landmarks 8. Commission. I conclude, therefore, that the HLC will not provide sufficient protection of the Local Historic District in the RMF 35 Zone without extending step back and setback mandatory protections to contributory local historic structures. 9. For the reasons above, I ask Council Members to withhold approval of the proposal in it’s current form. Respectfully submitted, Jim Jenkin Land Use Committee Chair Greater Avenues Community Council 10/21/2025 12:46 Warren CRUMMETT RMF-35/RMF-45 - We need your Decsion! Chair and Council Members, As a small scale developer in SLC, I’m writing in support of the RMF-35/RMF-45 zoning text amendment on your agenda and respectfully urging a YES vote. Delaying this decision any further is restricting much needed supply and increasing costs for builders and home buyers. I myself have 2 projects that have been waiting for this approval this whole year. As a developer, I have reviewed the ordinance and SLC planning has done a fantastic job of balancing adding the needed density while also preserving the characteristics of our existing neighborhoods. It also encourages keeping existing structures, has proper setback and design restrictions, and limits tall apartment buildings that feel out of place. Salt Lake City needs more missing-middle homes that fit the scale of existing neighborhoods. This ordinance is a practical, near-term tool to deliver them. Thank you for your leadership and for advancing a healthier, more inclusive housing ecosystem. Warren Crummett Go West Investments 10/21/2025 14:28 Shanelle Cripps Ineffectiveness of Traffic Calming Constituent is concerned about the abundant implementation of concrete barriers and speed bumps creating unsafe conditions and advocates for increased public transportation infrastructure