Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/09/2025 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL REVISED AGENDA FORMAL MEETING   September 9, 2025 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings.  Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chris Wharton, Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy, Vice Chair District 2 Victoria Petro District 1 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7   Generated: 11:42:12 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of April 8, 2025 and May 6, 2025. 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall declaring Sept. 15 - Oct. 15, 2025 as Hispanic Heritage Month in Salt Lake City. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes items which relate to the Main Street fire on August 11, 2025, including funding for an emergency loan fund program, rental assistance, and funding for barriers to allow safe pedestrian passage in front of the buildings burned in the recent fire, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 or Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 247 North 800 West The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning for the properties at approximately 247 North 800 West from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single- Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential). The proposal would enable development to the west of the existing single-family home. Any new development will be accessed from Hoyt Place, which is a private road. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petitioner: Bert Holland, representing the property owner. Petition No.:PLNPCM2024-00629.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 12, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Approximately 373 West American Avenue The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley situated adjacent to properties at approximately 373 West American Avenue. The proposal would close the alley to public use and allow the property owner of three of the four adjacent properties to potentially redevelop this site (the other adjacent property owner also supports the alley vacation.) The alley cannot be used as a mid-block connection because the 900 South viaduct is directly to the south. Located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Jarod Hall. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00636.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 7, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   3. Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment Public Lands (PL) and Street Vacation - West High School The Council will consider adopting the proposed Text Amendment and Street Vacation ordinances at approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School. The proposed changes include: •Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. This would apply to all PL zoning districts. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00320. •Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00321. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/2fdcpe2z.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   4. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment for Delta Center Arena Parking Garage at Approximately 301 West South Temple The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a Master Development Agreement for the construction of the Delta Center parking garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. The proposal includes the construction of a seven-story parking garage with approximately 452 parking stalls at the southwest corner of the site, which is intended to provide parking for patrons of the Delta Center Arena and improve the site's functionality. The applicant is requesting approval of the development agreement associated with the project, which establishes specific rules for constructing the parking garage at the Delta Center Arena. If approved, the proposed development agreement could supersede several of the City's rules and regulations. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jazz Arena Investors LLC. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00619.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 and Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)   E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Partial Street Vacation at Approximately 1101 West 400 South The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would close a portion of the public right-of-way on both 1100 West and 400 South adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South. The closure would facilitate the future construction of a new single- family residence on the property. The petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area is approximately five feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Erik Sansom, property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00178.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2. Ordinance: Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to residential buffer prohibitions. The proposal would review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The proposal also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01357.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3. Ordinance: Utility Installation Exemptions Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to utility installation exemptions. The proposal would clarify the application of utility exemptions and standardize the footnotes in related land use tables. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4. Resolution: Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would reallocate $230,306 in U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) HOME-American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds. Since these funds were allocated in 2024, Housing Stability Division staff and the service providers have recognized the need for case management to support some of the households receiving Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. Shifting funds to the Supportive Services category will enable the contracted organizations to provide this additional service while remaining within the City’s existing HUD allocation.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   5. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Liberty Heights Plat The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a portion of City-owned alley between approximately 1430 East and 1500 East, and between 1300 South and Sherman Avenue. The alley segment is not utilized for access by any abutting property and is obstructed at multiple points. Located within Council District 6. Petitioner: Philip Wilkes, adjacent property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00219.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   6. Ordinance: Local Landmark Site Designation for Sampson-Altadena Apartments The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting and ordinance that would establish the Sampson and Altadena Apartments as a local landmark site. The site consists of two buildings on one lot at approximately 276 East 300 South and 310 South 300 East. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: The Sampson-Altadena Condominiums Homeowner Association. Petition No.: PLNHLC2025-00357.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 16, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   7. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Anthony Wright The Council will consider approving the appointment of Anthony Wright, resident of District 6, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   8. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Denise Begue The Council will consider approving the appointment of Denise Begue, resident of District 3, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   9. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Pablo Cruz-Ayalo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Pablo Cruz-Ayalo, resident of District 5, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   10. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Nicholas Pedersen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Nicholas Pedersen, resident of District 2, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   11. Board Reappointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board – Aaron Wiley The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Aaron Wiley, resident of District 1, to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a term ending September 9, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   H.ADJOURNMENT:     CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 1:00 p.m. on Monday, September 8, 2025, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, April 8, 2025. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez The following Council Members were absent: Sarah Young Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – City Council Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Ben Luedtke – Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Kelsey Lindquist – Senior Planner, Daniel Echeverria – Senior Planner, Kristina Gilmore – Senior Planner, Ben Buckley – Associate Planner, Tony Milner – Housing Stability Division Director, Austin Kimmel – Public Policy Analyst, Katie Matheson – Economic Development Manager The meeting was called to order at 3:32 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 1 Work Session Items   1.Ordinance: Mixed-Use (MU) Zoning Consolidation Zoning Text and Map Amendment Follow-up ~ 3:30 p.m.  45 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing on a proposal that would amend the City's zoning ordinance and zoning map by consolidating up to 27 existing commercial, form- based, and mixed-use zoning districts into six new mixed-use (MU) districts. The proposal aims to simplify zoning regulations, improve clarity of language, and incorporate missing design standards. The new mixed-use districts will be similar to the current districts but will have changes to setbacks, building height, lot coverage, and permitted land uses. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCMixedUse. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2025 and Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD      Summary: Nick Tarbet provided an introduction to the briefing. Kelsey Lindquist, Daniel Echeverria, and Kristina Gilmore provided information on and presented the following Straw Polls: #1 – Straw Poll: Support for allowing drive-throughs in M-11 zone for financial institutions. All Council Members present were in favor. #2 – Straw Poll: Support for the Sugar House Core Area increased height (up to 150 feet) and to be consistent with Granary area conditions. All Council Members present were in favor. #3 – Straw Poll: Support for increasing row house height in MU-5/6/8/11 zones from 40 feet to 45 feet. All Council Members present were in favor. #4 – Straw Poll: Support for clarifying vertically stacked rowhomes were allowed. All Council Members present were in favor. #5 – Straw Poll: Support for pitched roof requirements in MU-2/3 zones (removing the requirement from both zones). All Council Members present were in favor. #6 – Straw Poll: a. Support for standardizing requirements across zones (for all building forms) – make consistent minimum 10% of lot area, with minimum 20% vegetation for open space. All Council Members present were in favor. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 2 b. 1, 2, 4. Support for standardizing requirements across zones (for rowhouse – front/corner side) – MU-2/3: merge to 5 feet with same exceptions and eliminate maximum. All Council Members present were in favor. b. 3. Support for standard of 10 feet for rowhouse rear yard setback for MU-11 (matching MU-5/6/8 zones). Council Members Mano, Lopez Chavez, Dugan, and Puy were in favor, with Council Members Wharton and Petro opposed. c. Support for standardizing requirements across zones for vertical mixed use/storefront/multifamily, front/corner side and rear yard (minimum/maximum), merge to 5 feet with same exceptions (MU-2/3). All Council Members present were in favor. #7 – Straw Poll: Support adding “Contractor’s Yard/Office (Indoor)” as allowed use in transitional overlay. All Council Members present were in favor, with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent for the poll. #8 – Straw Poll: Support for removing Richard Street from required enhanced active ground floor use list and removing 400 South from 500 West (rail overpass) to I-15. All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent for the poll. #9 – Straw Poll: Support for removing requirement of 6’ break between multiple buildings over 75 feet in facade length. All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent for the poll. #10 – Straw Poll: Support for ground vegetation could be substituted with tree canopy in most zones (exceptions: Downtown and Gateway) to make consistent with MU-8/11. All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent for the poll. #11 – Straw Poll: Support for new zoning transition period of three months from the time of adoption for the old zoning to be used, but the new zoning becomes effective immediately. (Current applicants could apply for old or new zones). All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent for the poll.   2.Ordinance: Alley Vacation Near 2680 South Chadwick ~ 4:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal to vacate a City-owned alley between approximately 2615 South and 2700 South, and between Beverly Street and Chadwick Streets. If approved, the alley would be divided and given to the property owners that abut the alley.The applicant has requested the vacation due to various structures and vegetation in the alley, as well as an overall lack of use. The request is supported by the Sugar House Master Plan. Located within Council District 7. Petitioner: Taylor Thomas, owner of 2680 South Chadwick.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 3 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025   Council Member Lopez Chavez was absent for this agenda item. Summary: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the proposal. Benjamin Buckley provided information regarding details of the request, active property enforcement details, and Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation for the proposal.   3.Informational: Sister Cities Annual Report 2024 ~ 4:35 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the Sister Cities Annual Report. The report includes a summary of the accomplishments achieved in 2024 and an outline of goals and priorities for the future. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 4   Council Member Lopez Chavez rejoined the meeting for this agenda item. Summary: Austin Kimmel provided a brief introduction. Katie Matheson and Ross Chambless (Sister Cities Board Chair) provided a presentation on the Sister Cities Report, including 2024 accomplishments, ongoing goals and priorities, and highlights of each Sister City (Torino, Italy; Matsumoto, Japan; Chernivtsi, Ukraine; Trujillo, Peru; and Keelung, Taiwan). Council and Staff discussed expansion of this program including strategic planning, budgeting, constituent communication and connecting small businesses between Salt Lake City and it’s Sister Cities.   4.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Follow-up ~ 4:55 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No. 5 for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding to cover remaining costs for the 400 South Bridge Reconstruction project, funds to repair homes in the Community Land Trust, additional funding for the Hive Pass program because of increased usage, and funding to expand the scope of a public restroom study. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 and Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025      Summary: Jennifer Bruno and Council Members discussed the following: • Administration’s proposal to move funds from vacancy savings in personnel budget to Advantage Services contract • Council added item regarding usage of Council Members’ communication budgets • Attachment to the Staff Report – Administration provided answers to questions asked in last budget amendment briefing MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 5 Council Requests: Council Member Petro requested annual data on the percentage of Fund Balance used for ongoing costs and capital expenditures. Ben Luedtke stated the information would be provided.   5.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Funding Allocations One-year Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant & Other Federal Grants Follow-up ~ 5:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing on recommendations for allocating grant funding provided through four federal Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) programs. For fiscal year 2025-26, approximately $7.7 million dollars is expected to flow through the Division of Housing Stability to community service providers selected by the Council. The HUD programs that provide this funding and oversee activities of grant recipients are: Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnership Program, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). The resolution under consideration would also approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as well as the new fiscal year 2025-29 Consolidated Plan. For more information visit www.tinyurl.com/annualhudgrants. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 18, 2025; Tuesday, March 25, 2025; Tuesday, April 1, 2025; and Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 4, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 15, 2025    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 6   Summary: Allison Rowland reviewed the grant funding timeline and provided updates from previous briefing. Tony Milner provided information regarding the upcoming HOPWA grant process and funding. Straw Poll: Support for moving funding from Line Item 21 – Odyssey House ($33,366) to Line Item 25 – Wasatch Community Gardens Green Team. All Council Members present were in favor.   Standing Items   6.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.     There were no reports.   7.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: • Legislative Action; and • Scheduling Items.     Summary: Lehua Weaver provided information regarding a legislative action for the Planning Department to re-evaluate the definition of “family” in City Code and noted it would be on the Council’s agenda next week for a vote.   8.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 7 a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to enter into closed meeting for the purposes of attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to exit the closed meeting. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Closed Session started at 5:35 PM. Held in the Work Session Room (location) and online via Zoom. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 8 Council Members in Attendance: Council Members Petro, Wharton, Lopez Chavez, Mano, Dugan. Council Member Puy attended online. City Staff in Attendance: Jill Love, Lindsey Nikola, Megan Yuill, Lehua Weaver, Nick Tarbet, Mark Kittrell, Allison Parks, Cindy Lou Trishman, Keith Reynolds, and Matt Brown. Jennifer Bruno, Blake Thomas, and Mary Beth Thompson attended online. Closed Session ended at 6:36 PM.     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 9 Meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, April 8, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 8, 2025 10 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, May 6, 2025. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Nick Tarbet – City Council Deputy Director, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Kristina Gilmore – Senior Planner, Weston Clark – Mayor's Senior Advisor, Andrew Reed – Deputy Budget Director, Austin Kimmel – Public Policy Analyst, Rylee Hall – Principal Planner The meeting was called to order at 2:10 p.m.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 1 Work Session Items 1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, wildfire mitigation, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.       Summary: Weston Clark presented the administrative update, highlighting key project updates, including the Rio Grande District Plan and its Implementation Strategy. Andrew Johnston presented the homelessness update, which included information on winter and summer bed shelter availability. 2.Ordinance: Northpoint Area Annexation ~ 2:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal annexing certain unincorporated properties North-Northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake County border with Davis County. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/NorthpointAnnexationSLC.       Summary: Nick Tarbet and Krissy Gilmore presented an update on the annexation status and discussed the development agreement parameters with Council Members, including the mixed requests from property owners for M1-A zoning for the proposed annexation and the zoning needs of corporate and private property owners within the area. Straw Poll: Support the approval of the M1-A Zoning for the property owners who have requested annexation at this time, and to apply M1-A Zoning to two current M1 properties to stay consistent with their current zoning. All Council Members present were in favor. 3.Ordinance: Alley Closure at Approximately 9 North Chicago Street (Madsen Park)~ 2:35 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about indefinitely closing a portion of City-owned alley located at approximately 9 North Chicago Street (Madsen Park) running north/south mid-block between 1000 West and Chicago Street. The proposed alley closure is needed to consolidate all parcels that make up Madsen Park into one parcel to facilitate park improvements that are being funded by the Parks, Trails, & Open Space General Obligation Bond (GO Bond). This portion of the alley doesn’t provide access to nearby residents to their properties or to the park. Located within Council District 2.       MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 2 Summary: Brian Fullmer introduced the item. Rylee Hall presented the information to the Council regarding the alley closure, including construction needs for the closure and the use of bond funds for the park improvement project. 4.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget: Administration’s Revenue Update ~ 2:55 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a revenue update from the Administration of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.       Summary: Andrew Reed and Mary Beth Thompson presented the information and discussed with the Council Members: • Fund increases and revenue projections for the FY 2025-2026 • Sales tax revenue projection decreased to a steady level from past years • History of general sales tax during the COVID pandemic versus 2025 sales • Property tax values for commercial and residential uses • Community concerns over tariffs affecting sales tax and General Fund revenue 5.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget: Metropolitan Water District ~ 3:25 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the proposed budget for the Metropolitan Water District for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The Council does not formally decide on this budget but accepts public input. The Council appoints a majority of the District's Board of Trustees, which has the ultimate authority to approve the budget. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26 .       Summary: Austin Kimmel introduced the item. Annalee Munsey (General Manager, Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy) and Todd Godfrey (Chair, Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy) presented the budget proposal and discussed with the Council: • Bond funding and the impact on property tax increases • Aging infrastructure for water utilities was being addressed/fixed • Challenges of addressing the less noticeable infrastructure • Proactively addressing maintenance projects to save money instead of a reactive approach and avoiding heavy financial impacts • Budget funds set aside for emergency projects and updates • Service area growth that impacted tax rates due to increased water usage, staffing needs, and business costs • Sandy City increased growth and decaying infrastructure needs compared to Salt Lake City's MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 3 6.Tentative Break ~ 3:55 p.m.  20 min.       7.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Follow-up ~ 4:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No. 5 for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding to cover remaining costs for the 400 South Bridge Reconstruction project, funds to repair homes in the Community Land Trust, additional funding for the Hive Pass program because of increased usage, and funding to expand the scope of a public restroom study. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.       Summary: Jennifer Bruno clarified the motion sheets and stated there would be a public hearing at the Formal Meeting that evening. Council Member Wharton stated that these items were essential to revisit to complete the discussion on funding before moving forward with a decision. Council Member Puy thanked the staff for helping the Council Members work through the policies. 8.Informational: Council Policy Discussion Re: The Legislative Subcommittee ~ 4:35 p.m.  20 min. The Council will hold a discussion on the protocol for handling issues and committee meetings during Legislative Session and on legislative topics throughout the year, including Subcommittee memberships, meeting attendance, and general guidelines outlined in the Council Policy Manual. The Subcommittee is currently made up of the Chair, Vice Chair and CRA Chair.       Summary: Nick Tarbet introduced the item and discussed with the Council Members: • Legislative Policy Committee (LPC) has three representatives, with a fourth exception if a member served on a Utah League of Cities and Towns Board. • Succession of Vice Chair and Chair for committees • Suggestions to vote on Board Chairs each year, to follow the same process to vote on Council Chair and Vice Chair • Suggestions to create a policy for expectations for chairs' roles and responsibilities • Terms for the LPC Board • Jennifer Bruno clarified the difference between a voting member and an attending member of the LPC, stating that any member can attend the meeting, but the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 4 Council only gets one vote. 9.Ordinance: City Flag Standards ~ 4:55 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing regarding City flag designs and standards for display.       Summary: Mayor Mendenhall discussed the new flag designs for Salt Lake City, their significance, and proposed the formal adoption of three additional flags to represent all members of the Salt Lake City Community. 10.Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Ari Tepper ~ 5:25 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Ari Tepper prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 25, 2028.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 11.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Cenezhana Rokhaneevna ~ 5:30 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Cenezhana Rokhaneevna prior to considering appointment to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 27, 2027.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 12.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Maxwell Hoagland ~ 5:35 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Maxwell Hoagland prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 13.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Kerry Doane ~ 5:40 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Kerry Doane prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028.       MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 5 Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 14.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – William D. Davis ~ 5:45 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview William D. Davis prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 15.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Jeannie Rollo ~ 5:50 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Jeannie Rollo prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. 16.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Rebecca Bauer ~ 5:55 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Rebecca Bauer prior to considering appointment to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028.       Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for Formal Approval. Standing Items   17.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.     There was no report.   18.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  -     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 6 Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. Summary: Jennifer Bruno confirmed the upcoming public meetings for the City Budget, with the timeline for adopting the final version set for mid-June 2025.   19.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.     Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of: strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation, discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 7 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Dugan to exit closed session and enter back into Work Session. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Closed Session started at 5:21 PM Held in the Work Session Room (location) and online via Zoom Council Members in Attendance: Council Members Dugan, Lopez Chavez, Wharton, Puy, Mano, Petro, Young City Staff in Attendance: Mayor Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Nick Tarbet, Mark Kitrell, Keith Reynolds, Lindsey Nikola, Megan Yuill, Cindy Lou Trishman, Matt Brown, Andrew Wittenberg, Jordan Carroll, Aspen English, Ashley Deitrick, Jasmine Walton, Nate Kobs, Sergent Dale Bench Closed Session ended at 5:49 PM     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 8 Meeting adjourned at 6:08 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, May 6, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 6, 2025 9 JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING AND HONORING HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH IN SALT LAKE CITY WHEREAS, Hispanic Heritage Month is celebrated nationwide from September 15 to October 15 each year to honor the rich history, culture, and contributions of Hispanic and Latino communities to the United States; and WHEREAS, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 41,500 residents of Salt Lake City—over 20% of the city’s population—identify as Hispanic or Latino. At the county level, Salt Lake County is home to nearly 232,000 Hispanic or Latino individuals, comprising 19.6% of the county’s 2020 population, and that population has continued to grow in recent years. Across Utah as a whole, nearly half-a-million residents (about 15% of the state’s population) identify as Hispanic or Latino. WHEREAS, this month begins on September 15, marking the anniversary of independence for several Latin American countries, including Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, followed by Mexico’s independence on September 16 and Chile’s on September 18; and WHEREAS, Hispanic and Latino individuals have made enduring contributions in the fields of arts, business, education, medicine, science, politics, law, and more, helping to shape Salt Lake City, the State of Utah, and the nation; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City celebrates the strength and resilience of the Hispanic community, recognizing its significant role in shaping our city’s present and future through leadership, entrepreneurship, civic engagement, and public service; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City is committed to fostering an inclusive and welcoming environment for all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity, or background, and strives to ensure that Salt Lake City remains a place where everyone has the opportunity to thrive; and WHEREAS, Hispanic Heritage Month serves as a reminder of the city’s ongoing efforts to address issues of equality, equity, and opportunity for all its residents, and to uplift the voices and experiences of our Hispanic and Latino residents. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City hereby recognize Monday, September 15th, 2025 through Wednesday, October 15th, 2025 as Hispanic Heritage Month in Salt Lake City and encourage all residents to join in celebrating the contributions, colorful cultures, and rich histories of Latino and Hispanic Americans. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City extend their appreciation to the Latino and Hispanic communities for their enduring contributions to our city. Adopted this 9th day of September, 2025. Erin Mendenhall Chris Wharton, Chair Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Council Member, District Three Alejandro Puy, Vice Chair Victoria Petro Salt Lake City Council Member, District Two Salt Lake City Council Member, District One Eva Lopez Chavez Darin Mano Salt Lake City Council Member, District Four Salt Lake City Council Member, District Five Dan Dugan Sarah Young Salt Lake City Council Member, District Six Salt Lake City Council Member, District Seven CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members DATE:September 9, 2025 UPDATED 6:30 p.m. RE:MOTIONS Budget Amendment No. 1 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 MOTION 1 to CLOSE the public hearing I move that the Council close the public hearing, and consider each item separately. MOTION 2 RE: Item A-3 for Public Right-of-Way Safety barricades I move that the Council {approve or defer or deny} Item A-3 for Public Right-of-Way Safety barricades. MOTION 3 RE: Item A-1 for the Emergency Loan Program I move that the Council {approve or defer or deny} Item A-1 for the Emergency Loan Program. MOTION 4 RE: Item A-4 for Rental Assistance I move that the Council {approve or defer or deny} Item A-4 for Rental Assistance. MOTION 5 RE: Information request I further move that the Council requests additional information from the Administration on the programs, including a recommendation on how to address the following topics: o identify criteria for when and why the City would make similar financial assistance programs available in response to other events, tragedies, or community needs, o identify any requirements for use of the Emergency Loan funds, and o considerations for higher boarded building fees within the CBD. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/SLCFY26 TO:Council Members FROM: Lehua Weaver, Jennifer Bruno, Sylvia Richards, Kate Werrett Budget and Policy Analysts DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Budget Amendment No. 1 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Work Session Briefing Notes On September 2nd, the Council held a briefing on the proposed assistance programs for property owners, businesses, and employees affected by the August fire on Main Street. Council Members discussed the goals of the business loans and rental assistance proposals, and took a straw poll to support the request for pedestrian safety barricades. A companion proposal from the CRA for property owner loans will be briefed at the September 9th CRA meeting. Council Members provided the following feedback on the business loans and rental assistance: Council Members were supportive of making the business loan funds available to other businesses that had direct impacts due to the fire, including replacing food that was lost or making needed repairs. In order to motivate other vacant storefronts to find tenants and contribute to the vibrancy of Main Street, a request was made to consider higher boarded building fees within the Central Business District (CBD). o In 2022, the City Council requested that the Administration review and propose a change in boarded building fees to capture the full City cost of both monitoring/boarding and emergency services of dangerous/boarded buildings. The City’s Finance Department conducted a cost analysis and found that each boarded building permit costs the City $15,551 annually. The Fee Study recommended a maximum proposed fee increase to be $14,000 due to small claims collections requirements. o The current fee schedule (adopted in 2024) charges an annual fee to non-residential structures of $6,000 in years 1-2; $9,000 in years 3-5; and $14,000 for years 6 or more. Council Members also asked for a recommendation on criteria so that the public can anticipate what types of events would trigger these types of financial support programs to be available from the City. o This request would apply to all three proposals: business loans, rental assistance, and the CRA property owner loans. Project Timeline: Consent: Sept. 2, 2025 1st Briefing: Sept. 2, 2025 Public Hearing: September 9, 2025 Potential Adoption: Sept. 9 or October 7, 2025 o The criteria or conditions may also address City factors that could limit the ability to make funding available. Council Members asked for a recommendation on how to ensure the Emergency Loan Program benefits Main Street and the CBD as much as possible. It is not practical to require the businesses to eventually relocate at the same place once the buildings are re-opened, but the Administration may have a recommendation for whether to have other eligibility requirements or use restrictions for the loans, for example: is there a preferred location for the businesses re-opening, whether funds can be used for “pop- ups,” upgrades or other uses, etc. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council may consider taking action on Item A-3 Public Right-of-Way Safety to formalize the September 2nd straw poll. The other two amendment items could be voted on as well, or be held until a future meeting. See attached motion sheet for draft language. Information below this line was provided for the September 2nd Work Session: All Budget Amendment items included in this transmittal are related to the City’s response to the Commercial Fire on the 300 South Block of Main Street In the aftermath of the August 11th fire on Main Street, the Administration has been actively exploring ways the City can support the property owners, business owners, and individual employees. Following are the requests which have a Council role. In addition to the proposals below from the General Fund, the Council – acting as the CRA Board of Directors – will also consider a new Disaster Loan Program and loan proposal during the September 9th CRA Meeting. Some summary information on this is provided below as “Additional Info” to give as much context to the proposals as possible. Budget Amendment Number One includes three proposed amendments. The amendment proposes changes in two funds. With the adoption of Budget Amendment #1, the available fund balance will be 12.89 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. If the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $580,933 below the minimum target. The Administration indicates a revenue update and projection will be provided with the second budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. UPDATED Fund Balance Chart The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #1. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment No. 1, the available fund balance will decrease slightly to 12.89%. For context, the fund balance at budget adoption was 12.93 percent. If all the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $580,933 below the minimum target of 13%. Item A-1: Emergency Loan Program ($600,000 combined from Emergency Loan Fund and General Fund Fund Balance) Summary Points: a. Who: Business Owners closed due to fire, adjacent business affected by the fire. b. Why: cover operational costs until the business can re-open somewhere c. Funding Source: $600,000 from the General Fund i. $327,000 from an "Emergency Loan Program" that was set up post-covid ii. $273,000 from the general fund fund balance this would leave fund balance at 12.9% (including GF and FoF) d. How much per business: $100,000 per business dislocated by the fire, the additional funding would be available for others affected, but not dislocated e. Terms: i. 5-year repayment ii. 0% interest iii. option to defer payments up to 2-years f. Loan application & Criteria: similar to other loan programs, especially post-COVID. Item A-2: Item withdrawn Item A-3: Public Right-of-Way Safety ($80,000 from General Fund) The Administration is requesting funding to expedite the placement of barriers for pedestrian safety. The barricades would divert pedestrians from the sidewalk into a protected path in the street. The City would seek reimbursement once development begins, since this is typically a property owner expense. Straw Poll: The Council may consider taking a straw poll on A-3 regarding barricades so that the safety measures are in place as quickly as possible. Item A-4: Rental Assistance ($100,000 from Funding Our Future RAFT Program) Summary Points: a. Who: Individual employees who worked for the businesses closed due to fire b. Why: Ensure they don’t lose housing due to lost income c. Funding Source: $100,000 from Funding our Future – Tenant Displacement funds i. The FOF Funds set aside through CDCU to help with Thriving in Place. ii. $700,000 in the fund, ~$300,000 already allocated to CDCU d. How much per employee: iii. $2,000 or one-month’s rent per full-time employee iv. $1,000 or one-month’s rent per part-time employee e. Terms: none; granted f. Application / Criteria: v. Application through CDCU – quickly processed vi. be an employee at time of the fire, lost income that makes up a quarter of their household income vii. residents of Salt Lake City with valid lease agreement viii. Combined household income of 80% AMI or below ADDITIONAL INFO: CRA Property Owner Loan – create new “Disaster Loan Program” – To be discussed on Sept 9 in the CRA Meeting. Summary Points: a. Who: Property Owners or long-term lease in CRA area b. Why: gap financing to help expedite reconstruction c. Funding Source: $14 m from commercial assistance program that’s come from all CRA project areas. $5m available in the CBD. d. How much per property: $1m each for 4 properties e. Terms: i. 0% and no payments for first 2 years, 2% in year 3 ii. 3 year term extendable to 5 yrs amortized over iii. 5% interest starting at year f. Loan application & Criteria: board approval, active fire insurance claim required. Policy Questions 1. The City has identified the importance of supporting this core block of Main Street to rebuild and re-activate as quickly as possible. Do the proposed funds target that goal and help the City, businesses, and property owners recover in the way they need? a. Are there conditions that could be added to the General Fund loans to the businesses to ensure that they find space nearby so that they are able to continue contributing to the vibrancy of Main Street / Downtown? b. Is there other support that would help ensure more activation on Main Street while these buildings are under construction? 2. The Council may wish to provide feedback about how any of the loans or donations are handled: a. Should the funding be given as a lump sum or as scheduled draws as criteria is met? b. Criteria for building or location to ensure the funding directly benefits Main Street. c. Other criteria or terms? 3. Does the Council want to request regular updates from the Administration on the progress for rebuilding, business recovery, and Main Street activity? 4. Will the Police Department take on more of a role with monitoring the vacant damaged property for trespassing or camping? 5. Council Members may want to request a future briefing with the Administration about the Funding our Future “RAFT” funding usage and outreach opportunities to improve its usage. Section B: Grants for Existing Resources (None) Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources (None) (None) (None) (None) (None) (None) SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/28/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/28/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/28/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/28/2025 Subject: FY26 Budget Amendment #1 Third Retransmittal New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: One item on the amendment was withdrawn and one item has been added. Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget. Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $353,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in two (2) funds, and the use of cash balance in the Emergency Loan Program totaling $327,000 and the additional $273,000 being transferred from the general fund to the ELF, resulting in an expense of $600,000 from the ELF. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modi fied based on the decisions of the Council. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: August 28,2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #1 – Third Retransmittal SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $0.00 $353,000.00 EMERGENCY LOAN PROGRAM $273,000.00 $600,000.00 TOTAL $273,000.00 $953,000.00 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments A revenue update and projection will be provided with the second budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #1. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #1, the available fund balance will adjust to 12.89 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 14,931,953$ 78,854,192$ 93,786,145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%25.42%17.38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57% 29.74% 30.99% 25.42% 17.38% 18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (27,392,780) (27,392,780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (353,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 51,461,412 66,040,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32% 18.82% 19.52% 25.42% 11.34% 12.89% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,721,525 512,471,524 TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $353,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in two (2) funds, and the use of cash balance in the Emergency Loan Program totaling $327,000 and the additional $273,000 being transferred from the general fund to the ELF, resulting in an expense of $600,000 from the ELF. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs A-1 Business Support: Commercial Fire at 300 South Block of Main Street GF 0.00 273,000.00 One-Time - A-1 Business Support: Commercial Fire at 300 South Block of Main Street ELP 273,000.00 600,000.00 One-Time - A-2 Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal One-Time - A-3 Main Street Fire Public Right of Way GF 0.00 80,000.00 One-time - A-4 Relocation Assistance for Tenants (RAFT) Program GF 0.00 (100,000.00)One-time - A-4 Main Street Fire Rental Assistance Proposal GF 0.00 100,000.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Consent Agenda Total of Budget Amendment Items 273,000.00 953,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #1: General Fund GF 0.00 353,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Emergency Loan Program Fund ELP 273,000.00 600,000.00 0.00 0.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 273,000.00 953,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Administration Proposed Council Approved Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 - Third Retransmittal Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section I: Council Added Items Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 - Third Retransmittal Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525.09 0.00 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822.00 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000.00 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084.00 41,675,084.00 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432.00 192,010,432.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859.00 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969.00 25,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881.00 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500.00 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700.00 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524.37 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865.00 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934.00 43,052,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525.00 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123.00 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634.00 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500.00 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779.00 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477.00 12,714,477.00 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000.00 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000.00 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000.00 1,700,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000.00 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999.00 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500.00 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,207.61 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232.00 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660.00 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732.07 273,000.00 - - - - 2,177,646,732.07 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 - Third Retransmittal Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952.26 353,000.00 464,712,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783.00 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000.00 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084.00 48,175,084.00 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815.00 216,611,815.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034.00 159,022,034.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800.30 26,465,800.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357.00 8,418,357.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577.00 476,954,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252.00 23,735,252.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524.37 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013.00 4,302,013.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934.00 43,052,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525.00 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332.00 29,357,332.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200.00 26,570,200.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500.00 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779.00 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477.00 12,714,477.00 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000.00 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688.00 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000.00 1,700,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000.00 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,571.83 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833.00 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,207.61 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232.00 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660.00 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 600,000.00 600,000.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131.37 953,000.00 - - - - 1,913,411,131.37 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 - Third Retransmittal Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 4 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 – Third Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Business Support: Commercial Fire at 300 South Block of Main Street GF One-time $273,000.00 ELP One-Time $600,000.00 Department: Administration Prepared By: Greg Cleary For questions, please include Jill Love and Mary Beth Thompson Following the commercial fire on the evening of Monday August 11, 2025 impacting businesses at the 300 South Block of Main Street, this budget amendment item is intended to provide short term financial support to the impacted businesses and provide temporary operational expenses while displaced. This item is intended to provide the five (5) directly impacted businesses up to $100,000 each. Additional funds in the amount of $100,000 are being requested at this time, as the full impacts following this event are unknown, and to allow some flexibility in supporting the impacted business community. The funding will be provided in the form of a loan, which include a 5-year repayment term with no interest. Borrowers will have the option to defer payments for up to 2 years, before payments begin . These efforts have a unique nature because of the size and scale of loss impacting a major ecosystem of business in Salt Lake City. The total loss of four consecutive businesses impacting more than 250 employees, as well as resulting impacts to neighboring businesses, creates a major gap in the commerce of a main downtown core block face. These are thriving businesses that drive traffic and activation that benefit the entire downtown ecosystem, including public safety. Because of these special, unprecedented circumstances, and in order to avoid a languishing block face on Main Street, the City needed to explore avenues expedite recovery and restoration. The Emergency Loan Program (ELP) will contribute $327,000 (cash balance) while the General Fund will contribute $273,000, totaling $600,000. Additionally, the CRA will bring a related item to the board, requesting funding assist property owners with the hope that it expedites rebuilding at the impacted site. This funding would be offered as a no -interest 2-year loan. Finally, assistance for individual employees is being handled in coordination with Downtown Alliance in a fundraising effort. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite the support. Withdrawn Prior to Transmittal A-3: Mainstreet Fire Public Right of Way GF One-time $80,000.00 Department: Non-Departmental Prepared By: Lynn Jacobs For questions, please Lynn Jacobs, Jon Larsen, Julianne Sabula The Administration is requesting funding for Transportation to erect barriers to allow safe pedestrian passage in front of the buildings burned in the recent fire on Main Street. These barriers would be used to create a path in front of the buildings that would reroute sidewalk traffic from the sidewalk to the street adjacent to the area in front of the building where metered parking spaces currently exist. The parking spaces would be bagged and not utilized for parking while the barriers are in place. Transportation wants to take the safest approach to keeping pedestrians safe while helping to keep the area walkable and vibrant. The sidewalk is currently closed, but most pedestrians are ignoring the closure and walking out in the street to get around the fencing surrounding the burned buildings. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 – Third Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 To ensure the barriers are placed as quickly as possible, the city would need to rent them since the city doesn’t have any such barriers. The estimated cost to rent the barriers is $4,000 per week, or a cost of $48,000 over the 90-day period. However, since the cost of renting the barriers would be so high over the 90-day period, Transportation is working with suppliers on a potential rent-to-own arrangement. This would allow the city to have these barriers to use in other locations and circumstances. Transportation is requesting $80,000 for barrier rental/purchase. This amount will allow a cushion should the costs be higher than anticipated. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite the support. A-4: Relocation Assistance for Tenants (RAFT) Program GF One-time ($100,000.00) A-4: Main Street Fire Rental Assistance Proposal GF One-time $100,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tammy Hunsaker For questions, please include Tammy Hunsaker The Administration is proposing to allocate a portion of the funding currently appropriated to the Relocation Assistance for Tenants (RAFT) Program to a new program that will provide emergency rental assistance for employees that are financially impacted by the Main Street fires. The RAFT program is being administered by the Community Development Corporation of Utah. The Administration is proposing that up to $100,000 of the funding currently appropriated to RAFT be used for a Main Street Fire Rental Assistance Program. This item is to rescope Funding Our Future budget, which has been previously approved and allocated as part of the FY 2026 adopted budget. The RAFT program is intended to provide emergency rental assistance for those facing displacement due to redevelopment or rent increases. The new Main Street Fire Rental Assistance Program would be different than the RAFT program as it would assist employees who have lost income due to the fire. Funding is not intended to compensate for ongoing rent but is intended to provide a one-time payment to help stabilize renters. Amount of Assistance: • Full time employees: $2,000 or the amount of one month rent, whichever is lower • Part time employees: $1,000 or the amount of one month rent, whichever is lower • To be disbursed on a first-come, first-serve basis for eligible applicants, subject to funding availability. To be eligible: • Applicants must rent a house or apartment in Salt Lake City. • Applicants must have a valid lease agreement with a monthly rental payment. • Applicants must be on the lease. • Applicants must have a combined household income of 80% AMI or below. • Applicants must have lost income due to the Main Street fires, with the income loss equating to at least a quarter of the household income. Note: Persons are deemed ineligible if they live in public housing or have ongoing rental assistance (i.e. Section 8 or a Housing Choice, etc.) CAN will be amending the contract to match the requirements in th is budget amendment item. Once the amendment is adopted the contract will be modified as the Council has approved it for the new purpose. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #1 – Third Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2,788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1,018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 $777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 247 North 800 West PLNPCM2024-00629 MOTION 1 (adopt) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 247 North 800 West PLNPCM2024-00629 PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE There were no comments on this item during the September 2, 2025 public hearing. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action to a future meeting. The following information was provided for previous Council meetings. It is included again for background purposes. BRIEFING UPDATE August 19, 2025 briefing Council Members expressed general support for the proposed rezone. In response to a question about a requirement for the existing home to be preserved, Planning staff stated that is not required but if it is demolished, replacement housing must be provided. New homes on Hoyt Place would not be required to face the street because it is a private road. The applicant prefers to not have street facing garages, so they would likely be accessed from a private alley. ISSUE AT A GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to amend the zoning map for the parcels at 247 North 800 West in City Council District Two from their current R-1/7,000 (single-family residential district) and SR-3 (special development pattern residential) zoning to R-1/5,000 (single-family residential) and SR-3. The two subject parcels share the 247 North 800 West address and are shown in the image below. The applicant’s stated objective is to construct for sale family sized (at least three bedroom) single-family homes on the parcels. To accomplish this a lot line adjustment would likely be required and new homes Item Schedule: Page | 2 constructed behind the existing home. The Hoyt Place facing parcel is vacant. No development plans have been submitted as of the date this report was written. It is important to note that if the zoning map amendment is adopted by the Council, the property could be redeveloped with any use allowed under the zone. Planning staff recommended, and the Commission voted 5:0 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council with the following conditions: At least half of the new units developed on the site will have a minimum of three bedrooms. If the existing home on the site is demolished replacement housing will be provided as outlined in City code. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS Page | 3 Area zoning map with subject parcels outlined. Red area shows approximate area where SR-3 zoning would extend, reducing the yellow outlined parcel which is proposed to be rezoned to R-1/5,000. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Combined, the two parcels total approximately one third acre. As shown below, surrounding zoning is a mix of R-1/7,000 for parcels facing 800 West, SR-3 within Hoyt Place. R-1/5,000 (single-family residential) is on the east side of 800 West, as is Jackson Elementary School (zoned PL (public lands)). Area development is primarily single-family homes and duplexes. Some small scale development, mostly infill, is occurring in the area that includes single-family attached and detached homes, and duplexes. This neighborhood is well served by transit with the Jackson/Euclid Trax stop a block and a half from the subject site, and the Frontrunner station is within a half mile. In addition, there are five bus routes within two blocks, including a frequent transit network route. Page | 4 The property is in the Salt Lake City Northwest National Historic District and the home is listed as a contributing structure. Unlike local historic districts, buildings in national historic districts do not have City protection from demolition, meaning the property owner may tear down the home as part of any property redevelopment. When homes on the block were built, zoning was Residential R-2 which permitted single- and two-family dwellings by right. Minimum lot size was 5,000 square feet rather than today’s 7,000 square feet within R- 1/7,000 zoning. There was not a minimum lot width in Residential R-2 zoning, while current zoning requires a 50-foot minimum. Because of this several lots in the area do not meet existing zoning. The existing R-1/7,000 and proposed R-1/5,000 zoning are nearly identical with the primary difference being minimum lot size. R-1/5,000 zoning also has slightly smaller side yard setbacks (4 feet on one side and 10 on the other vs. 6 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other in R-1/7,000). Both zones allow single- family detached homes, with an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) if enough space is available. SR-3 zoning is designed for interior portions of blocks and is a medium-density zoning district that doesn’t change neighborhood character. It is intended for infill development with building size, height, and setbacks that are comparable with R-1/7,000 zoning. In addition to single-family detached dwellings, this zone allows single-family attached, two-family, and twin-home dwellings. A table comparing the current and proposed zones is found in Key Consideration 1 below. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified four key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 6-12 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – R-1/5,000 and SR-3 Neighborhood Compatibility Planning staff noted that similarities between the current R-1/7,000 and SR-3 and proposed R-1/5,000 zoning districts would lead to development that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. Although additional housing types (attached single-family, duplexes, and twin homes) could be built within the SR-3 district, the size and scale of structures would be similar to the current neighborhood development pattern. The following table comparing zoning standards of R-1/7,000, R-1/5,000, and SR-3 districts is found on page 6 of the Planning Commission staff report. It is replicated here for convenience. Zoning standards that are identical across zoning districts are shaded in green. Zoning Standards Existing R-1/7,000 Single Family Residential Proposed R-1/5,000 Single-family Residential Existing/Proposed SR-3 Special Development Pattern Maximum Building Height 28 feet 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Wall Height 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Front Setback Average of the block face Average of the block face Average of the block face Page | 5 Side setback 6 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other. 4 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other.4 feet Rear setback 25 feet 25% of lot depth or 20 feet, whichever is less. 20% of lot depth. No less than 15 feet, no more than 30 feet. Maximum lot coverage 40%40%60% for detached dwellings, 70% for attached dwellings. Minimum lot size 7,000 square feet 5,000 square feet Single-family detached: 2,000 square feet. Single-family attached: 1,500 square feet. Two-family dwelling: 3,000 square feet. Twin home dwelling: 1,500 square feet. Minimum lot width 50 feet 50 feet Single-family detached: 30 feet. Single-family attached: 22 feet. Two-family dwelling: 44 feet. Twin-home dwelling: 22 feet. Consideration 2 – General Plan Compatibility Planning staff found that the proposed zoning map amendment aligns with principles and goals found in Plan Salt Lake, the North Temple Boulevard Plan, and Housing SLC. Furthermore, the North Temple Boulevard Plan (page 52) calls for infill development on the blocks between 800 and 1000 West, and 200 and 300 North. Consideration 3 – R-1/5,000 and SR-3 Development Potential Planning identified several potential development scenarios under the current R-1/7,000 and SR-3 zoning, and within the proposed R-1/5,000 and SR-3 zoning. The lists below are based on total square footage and do not account for lot coverage and setback requirements. When these requirements are factored in, they may further limit the number of units allowed. Existing R-1/7,000 and SR-3 Consolidate the parcels and expand the house toward the back. Consolidate the parcels and add an attached or detached ADU. Adjust lot lines and request planned development approval to build one additional single-family home in the back without street frontage. Use affordable housing incentives to build up to four additional units in the rear of the property. This requires 25-50% of the units to be sold or rented at an affordable level determined by City code. Proposed R-1/5,000 and SR-3 (assumes existing single-family home is maintained, and lot lines are adjusted to meet 5,000 square foot minimum required under R-1/5,000.) Build four detached single-family dwellings behind the existing home. Build three two-family/duplex (for rent) or twin home (for sale) structures behind the existing home (total of six additional units). Build six attached single-family dwellings behind the existing home. Page | 6 Use affordable housing or building preservation incentives to build additional units (requires maintaining the existing home). Consideration 4 – Community Benefit Zoning map amendments are required to demonstrate a community benefit the rezone will provide as outlined in Chapter 21A.50.050.C Salt Lake City code. The applicant identified Community Benefit A as the primary benefit provided by the proposal. It reads: Providing housing that aligns with the current of future needs of the community as determined by the general plan. Needs could include the level of affordability in excess of the number of dwellings that exist on the site, size in terms of number of bedrooms, or availability of housing for purchase. Planning staff noted feedback from Fairpark neighborhood residents expressing concerns with large developments on North Temple, without family-sized units, next to single-family neighborhoods. It is Planning’s opinion that the proposed infill development could help address this through additional housing choices that would be available for purchase. Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommended at least half of any new units would be required to have a minimum of three bedrooms. This could be accomplished with a development agreement and offer some assurance that the community benefit will be provided. The applicant expressed an intention to preserve the existing home, but the City cannot require it. As discussed above, if the Council adopts the proposed rezone, approval could include a condition that replacement housing is provided if the home is demolished. Analysis of Standards Attachment F (pages 44-49) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with and helps implement the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent and nearby properties due to the change in development potential and allowed uses that do not currently apply to the property. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable Complies Page | 7 overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Complies The status of existing transportation facilities, any planned changes to the transportation facilities, and the impact that the proposed amendment may have on the city’ s ability, need, and timing of future transportation improvements. Complies The proximity of necessary amenities such as parks, open space, schools, fresh food, entertainment, cultural facilities, and the ability of current and future residents to access these amenities without having to rely on a personal vehicle. Complies The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. Complies The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Complies with conditions The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Complies The community benefits that would result from the proposed map amendment. Complies with conditions City Department Review Public Utilities clarified that utilities on Hoyt Place are public, and the road is private. They noted some upgrades may be needed at the developer’s expense, and any development will need to meet the requirements found in the code. Transportation recommended a fire truck turn-around before they would be supportive. Other responding departments and divisions did not express opposition to the proposed rezone. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • May 29, 2024 – Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • September 9, 2024 – Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Senior Planner Page | 8 • October 22, 2024 – o Information about the proposal was sent to the Fairpark Community Council to solicit public comments and start the 45-day recognized organization input and comment period. o Planning staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. • October-December 2024 – Online open house. • December 2024-March 2025 – Planning staff worked with the applicant to improve the quality of their application material, including refining the applicant’s analysis of relevant standards and reviewing options for meeting the community benefit requirements. • March 26, 2025 – Planning staff posted notices on City and State websites and sent notices via the Planning listserv for the April 9, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notice mailed. • March 28, 2025 – The applicant posted a public hearing notice sign on the property with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing. • April 9, 2025 – The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the request and voted 5-0 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • May 12, 2025 – Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. • June 3, 2025 – Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • June 24, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 06/04/2025 Date Sent to Council: 06/24/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Seth Rios E-mail Seth.Rios@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 06/19/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 06/24/2025 Subject: Zoning Map Amendment- 247 North 800 West New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: Added the requested divider sheets. Also added the City Attorney's signature to the ordinance. Additional Staff Contact: Aaron Barlow: aaron.barlow@slc.gov & 8015356182 Presenters/Staff Table Seth Rios- seth.rios@slc.govAaron Barlow- aaron.barlow@slc.govKrissy Gilmore- kristina.gilmore@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Approval Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Please see document above. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City has received a request from Bert Holland, representing the property owner, to rezone the properties at 247 North 800 West (Parcel IDs 08354260120000 & 08354260230000) from the SR-3 and R-1/7,000 to SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential and R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential. The intent of the request is to enable the owner to build small-scale housing on the land located behind the existing home. The SR-3 zone features slightly reduced zoning standards to encourage small-scale infill development on the interior portion of the block. The SR-3 zone allows more housing types than the R-1/7,000 zone, such as duplexes, twin-homes, and attached single-family units. The subject area is located in the Fairpark neighborhood and is surrounded by a variety of zoning districts. The surrounding land uses include single-family houses, duplexes, and multi-family apartments. The proposal to change the zoning complies with the North Temple Boulevard’s goals to promote compatible infill development on this block. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation for approval with two conditions. The first condition requires that half of any new units be family-sized, meaning they contain at least three bedrooms. The second condition requires the applicant to comply with the displaced tenant requirements of Chapter 21A.50.050.D of the city code. This chapter of code requires the applicant to assist in tenant relocation if the existing home is demolished. If the Salt Lake City Council adopts this rezone request, the applicant would then need to submit the necessary development applications, and the project would need to comply with all relevant regulations within the Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance. Review by the Planning Commission would be required if the applicant requests modifications to zoning regulations through the Planned Development or Design Review processes. Since this request is not for the development of the site, Planning staff has not reviewed any plans for compliance with applicable zoning requirements. Materials submitted by the applicant can be found in Planning staff’s report to the Planning Commission. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification: Notification of the proposal was sent to all owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the subject property on October 22, 2024. • Fairpark Community Council: The Fairpark Community Council was notified of the proposal on October 22, 2024. • City Open House: A virtual open house for the proposal has been hosted on the City’s website since October 22, 2024. • Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed rezoning on April 9, 2025. Following Planning staff’s recommendation, the commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the request with a vote of 5-0. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of April 9, 2025 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of April 9, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of April 9, 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to two parcels of property located at 247 North 800 West from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential to R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to a parcel located at 247 North 800 West (“Property”) from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential to R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-00629. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (”Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on April 9, 2025, on an application submitted by Bert Holland, on behalf of the property owner, to rezone the Property from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential to R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-00629. WHEREAS, at its April 9, 2025, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its April 9, 2025, meeting, the Planning Commission recommended two conditions of approval. The first condition requires that half of any new units in a future development project must have at least three bedrooms. The second condition requires the owner to comply with Section 21A.50.050.E of the Salt Lake City Code if the existing single-family home is demolished. WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the parcels located at 247 North 800 West (Tax ID Nos. 08-35- 426-012-0000 & 08-35-426-023-0000), more particularly described -on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is rezoned from R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential to R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential. SECTION 2. Condition. This map amendment is conditioned upon the owner of the Property entering into a development agreement that establishing the following: (1) at least half of any new units in a future development project on the Property must have at least three bedrooms; (2) the owner of the Property, and/or its contractors or agents, shall comply with Section 21A.50.050.E of the Salt Lake City Code if the existing single-family home on the Property is demolished. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 2 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 4. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 2 above have not been met within one year after adoption, then this ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the condition identified above. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 202__. 3 ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 202__. Published: ______________. Ordinance Rezoning 247 N 800 Wv1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__6/5/2025_____________________ By: _/s/Courtney Lords _______________________________ Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” 247 North 800 West Tax IDs: 08-35-426-012-0000 & 08-35-426-023-0000 R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential Section- 53.34' x 102', 5,440 sq ft Beginning at a Point 5 rods south of the Northeast corner of Lot 7, Block 70, Plat C, Salt Lake City Survey; Thence South 53.34 feet; thence West 102.00 feet; thence North 53.34 feet; thence East 102.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential Section- 53.34' x 89.4', 4,768 sq ft Beginning at a Point 5 rods south and 102.00 feet West of the Northeast corner of Lot 7, Block 70, Plat C, Salt Lake City Survey; Thence South 53.34 feet; thence West 89.40 feet; thence North 53.34 feet; thence East 89.40 feet to the Point of Beginning. This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2024-00629 May 29, 2024 Petition for the zoning map amendment received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. September 9, 2024 Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Senior Planner. October 22, 2024 Information about the proposal was sent to the Fairpark Community Council to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. October 22, 2024 Planning staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Oct-Dec 2024 Planning staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. Dec 2024-Mar 2025 Planning staff worked with the applicant to improve the quality of their application material, including refining the applicant’s analysis of relevant standards and reviewing options for meeting the Community Benefit requirements. March 26, 2025 Planning Staff posted notices on City and State websites and sent notices via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting on April 9, 2025. Public hearing notice mailed. March 28, 2025 The applicant posted a public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing on the property. April 9, 2025 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the request. By a vote of 5-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. May 12, 2025 Planning Staff requested the zoning map amendment ordinance from the City Attorney’s office. June 3, 2025 Planning staff received the zoning map amendment ordinance from the City Attorney’s office. This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-00629 Maricruz Rezone. Salt Lake City has received a request from Bert Holland, representing the property owner, to amend the zoning map for (or rezone) the property at approximately 247 North 800 West (Parcel IDs 08-35-426- 012-0000 & 08-35-426-023-0000) from the SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential and R- 1/7,000 Single-Family Residential to the SR-3 Special Development Pattern Residential and R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District. The intent of this rezone is to enable development to the west of the existing single-family home. Any new development will be accessed from Hoyt Place, which is a private road. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at 801.535.7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Aaron Barlow at 801.535.6182 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by e-mail at aaron.barlow@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at slcpermits.com. To view the applicant’s submittal, click on the Planning tab, type the petition number (PLNPCM2024-00629) into the search bar, and click on record info. The submittal materials can be viewed under the “Attachments” tab. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. MAILING LIST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIPWORLDWIDE GOSPEL CHURCH 4795 S CHENTELLE DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129AKI DERZON 13164 S PINK BLOSSOM DR HERRIMAN UT 84096PERRY E SR SPIGHT; MARGARET A SPIGHT (JT)846 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 DOUBLE INFINITY INVESTMENTS LLC 836 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 BASES LOADED INVESTING, LLC 230 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CHRISTOPHER R JOHNSON 820 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 HOOKER INVESTMENTS, LLC 2694 E GRAND VIEW DR SANDY UT 84092 SALT LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES 622 W 500 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES, INC 622 W 500 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 TRENTON YOUNG 850 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 JOSE T TAFOLLA 962 W 200 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JO ANN O TWISDALE; TOMMY M TWISDALE (TC)PO BOX 16915 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SMITH FAMILY TRUST 10/29/2019 331 PARK VIEW CIR BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 LM TR 434 ZINFANDEL CIR CLAYTON CA 94517 MERCEDES MONDRAGON; IXCHEL PADILLA PADILLA (JT)845 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 LLB IRR TR 1139 W OURAY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 JOSEPH MAROTTA 837 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 PERRY E SPIGHT; MARGARET SPIGHT (JT)846 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 JASON S HARDELL 266 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 NEILLE FENDERSON 260 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 258N 900W, A SERIES OF RCJ PROPERTIES, LLC 267 E EAGLE RIDGE DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JENNIFER SIMPSON 250 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 EDWARD DEL RIO 246 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 HOWARD KENT, INC 450 E BURTON LANE KAYSVILLE UT 84037 GOUD PRADYUMNA MARAGANI 4523 W PARK BEND CT RIVERTON UT 84096 MARK R WILLIAMS 8205 FATHOM RD PENSACOLA FL 32514 HOWARD KENT, INC 450 E BURTON LN KAYSVILLE UT 84037 APOLO T MAUAI; THELMA MAUAI (JT)230 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 MATT MERTLICH 228 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SHANNON ALYSSA BOYLE 220 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 ERIC PRIBYL 216 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 AMBER SECKLETSTEWA; ERIC SECKLETSTEWA (JT)859 W HOYT PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 300 WEST SLC, LLC 8022 S STREAM VIEW DR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84093 878-880 WEST 200 NORTH LLC 1590 N MANDALAY RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 MICHAEL WOLF HOFFMAN 872 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 PETER M LASUO 866 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 RODNEY & MERILEE SABINO LIVING TRUST 05/19/2020 1064 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102ARMANDO MIRANDA; ROSALBA MIRANDA (JT)858 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116ALFONSO JOSE ULIBARRI 852 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116EIGHT FORTY WEST PROPERTIES, LLC 8850 S 700 E SANDY UT 84070J & S PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC 3671 E WINESAP RD COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121SWW LV TRST 234 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116ARAM NASR 236 N 900 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116TWO SQUARES INVESTMENTS, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152MIKE ORTHNER; SHAE M MEARS (JT)1216 N 900 E BOUNTIFUL UT 84010DURAEL SPIGHT; JESSICA SPIGHT (JT)821 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 WYNETHA BRIDGEWATER; JAKE LEE (JT)155 N 700 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 TIMOTHY RICHARDS 277 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 CAMMY LISCOMB; JACOB CARLING (JT)273 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 GRIFFITHS PARTNERS, LLC 1021 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 BERNADETTE DESCHINE 257 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 ANTONIO J VALDEZ; MELODY A VALDEZ (JT)121 S JEREMY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MARIA D CANDELARIA 247 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 PAWPURR UT ALPHA, LLC 2143 INNER CIRCLE SOUTH SAINT PETERSBURG FL 33712 ORSON T PORTER; MARISA L PORTER (JT)371 E RENA AVE MIDVALE UT 84047 SHIREL WOODCOX 229 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 JOHN GORDON STORRS & ORLAN ROE OWEN FAMILY TRUST 08/18/2021 223 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 THOMAS E DEVROOM 213 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 MATHEW CODY BUNDERSON; TARYN ANNA BUNDERSON (JT)810 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 DEAN A TRUJILLO; JENNIFER M TRUJILLO (JT)219 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 TWO SQUARE INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 MIKE ORTHNER; SHEA M MEARS (JT)826 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 ERIC BAIM 272 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 SALT LAKE CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111ALEJANDRO PUY ECHEGARAY 226 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116M FM TRST 434 ZINFANDEL CIR CLAYTON CA 94517TY MILLER 2455 E 2900 S MILLCREEK UT 84109 FREE CHURCH OF TONGA IN AMERICA 47 N DELAWARE ST SAN MATEO CA 94401 ALEJANDRA FRANCO 270 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 LINDA J LEMMON 260 N 800 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Current Occupant 862 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 822 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 818 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 814 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 810 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 806 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 802 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 848 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 274 N 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 867 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 861 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 849 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 841 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 833 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 831 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 258 N 900 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 860 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 858 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 824 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #105 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #104 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #103 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL # 102 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #101 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #110 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #109 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #108 Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL #107 Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 854 W HOYT PL # 106 Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 845 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 843 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 878 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 862 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 840 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 834 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 833 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116Current Occupant 825 W HOYT PL Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 830 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 819 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 267 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 251 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 241 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 235 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 829 W 300 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 826 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 256 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 232 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 228 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 222 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 216 N 800 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 776 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 Current Occupant 752 W 200 N Salt Lake City UT 84116 This page has intentionally been left blank Item C2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Alley Vacation at Approximately 373 West American Avenue PLNPCM2023-00636 MOTION 1 (adopt) I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 (reject) I move that the Council reject the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Alley Vacation at Approximately 373 West American Avenue PLNPCM2023-00636 PUBLIC HEARING UPDATE There were no comments on this item during the September 2, 2025 public hearing. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action to a future meeting. The following information was provided for previous Council meetings. It is included again for background purposes. SEPTEMBER 2, 2025 UPDATE During the August 19, 2025 follow-up briefing Council Members were generally supportive of the proposed alley vacation and property exchange. They expressed a desire for a development agreement requiring activation of the proposed pedestrian corridor. Planning staff noted the alley vacation would not become effective until development plans are approved and comply with conditions in the development agreement. BRIEFING UPDATE During the January 7, 2025 briefing Council Members discussed the public benefit provided by an easement along the east side of the parcels, along the potential future Trax Orange Line. Planning staff noted that no development plans have been submitted so additional public benefits can be specified. The applicant discussed potentially building townhomes along the easement which would result in activation of the area. The Council discussed including design requirements of a public street in a development agreement or other mechanism to ensure they will be in a future development on the site. Item Schedule: Page | 3 Since the briefing, the applicant had the alley and easement properties appraised. The appraisal valued each property at $65,000. City Real Estate Services reviewed the appraisal and believes it reflects a reasonable price for the properties. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate an approximately 135 foot by 11.5 foot north/south alley running between 373 West American Avenue to a former east/west alley that was vacated in 1965 and incorporated into the applicant’s property. The Interstate-15 900 South viaduct abuts the southern property line which renders the alley unusable as a mid-block connection within the neighborhood. The applicant proposes redeveloping their parcels into a multi-family development, though no formal proposal has been submitted to date. To support the Ballpark Station Area Plan’s goal of improving pedestrian connectivity, the applicant proposes providing a 10-foot-wide easement on the eastern edge of their property at 337 West American Avenue as shown in the image below. This would run along existing railroad tracks and the potential TRAX Orange Line light rail route. The applicant owns four of the five parcels abutting the alley and the other property owner is supportive of the proposed alley vacation. If approved by the Council the vacated alley property would be sold to the abutting property owners at market value. The Planning Commission reviewed this petition during its September 11, 2024 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one offered comments. The Commission followed Planning staff’s recommendation and voted 7-0 in support of the proposed alley vacation, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall establish a utility easement in place of the existing public alley right-of-way following the approval of the request or coordinate relocation of existing power lines with Rocky Mountain Power. 2. The applicant shall establish a 10-foot-wide public access easement along the eastern boundary of 337 West American Avenue. 3. The applicant shall not purport to convey the property encompassing any portion of the alley until at least 60 days after a final decision by the City Council on the petition. (Staff note: this is a recommendation from the City Attorney’s Office to allow time to finalize the ordinance and complete a transaction for the alley property and proposed easement.) 4. The applicant must consolidate the parcels through a lot consolidation. Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed alley closure, address questions Council Members may have and prepare for a public hearing. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. Does the Council support the Planning Commission’s recommendation to close this alley? 2. Is the Council supportive of the proposed conditions of approval? Page | 3 South facing aerial view of the subject alley and proposed easement highlighted in blue. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITONAL INFORMATION In 2022 a previous owner attempted to vacate the subject alley through a quiet title action. (A quiet title action is lawsuit in civil court to establish or settle title to property. They often involve cases in which there is disagreement on who holds the title, and the lawsuit is intended to remove or “quiet” claims to a title, resulting in a clear title.) In this case, the court incorrectly granted title (or ownership) to the alley property to the previous owner who brought the quiet title action, but the City was not notified. The alley is included in the subdivision plat and has not previously been vacated. Public rights-of-way cannot be vacated through quiet title actions. A notice of public alley is being held in escrow by the City Attorney’s Office and clarifies the alley remains City property unless and until the City Council approves the alley vacation. Alley vacation requests receive three phases of review, as outlined in section 14.52.030 Salt Lake City Code (see pages 5-7 below). Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council. Planning staff identified four key considerations connected to this alley vacation. A short description of each issue is provided below for reference. Please see pages 4-8 of the Planning Commission staff report for full analysis of these issues. Consideration 1: Analysis of Alley Vacation Factors Section 14.52.030.B Salt Lake City Code directs the Planning Division to analyze factors in the following table. Planning staff found the proposed alley factors clearly meet seven of the eight factors. The factor in blue text received additional consideration, which is discussed below. The Ballpark Station Area Plan (2022) discusses potential removal of the 900 South Interstate-15 viaduct and replacing it with community amenities. UDOT owns the viaduct and indicated it has no plans to Page | 4 change the current configuration. Vacating the alley would remove it from public access should the viaduct ever be eliminated or reconfigured. However, it is Planning staff’s opinion that the applicant’s proposed easement adjacent to the potential TRAX Orange Line will widen an existing connection through the block and not result in a use that is contrary to the Ballpark Plan. Factor Planning Staff Finding The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division, and all other relevant City Departments and Divisions have no objection to the proposed disposition of the property. Complies The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above. Complies with Policy Consideration A – Lack of Use. The petition must not deny sole access or required off-street parking to any adjacent property. Complies The petition will not result in any property being landlocked. Complies The disposition of the alley property will not result in a use which is otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses. Complies No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit. Complies The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and Complies The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses. Complies Consideration 2: Policy Considerations Consideration 3: 2022 Quiet Title Claim Consideration 4: General Plan Considerations Page | 5 The subject alley is identified in the Central Community Master Plan, Ballpark Station Area Plan, and Downtown Plan. Given the alley’s termination point at the Interstate-15 900 South viaduct, it is highly unlikely it will be usable as a public right-of-way in the future. City Department Review During City review of the petition, the Engineering Division noted the need to maintain access for Rocky Mountain Power to service its lines. This is addressed in the Planning Commission’s recommendation to establish a utility easement or coordinate with Rocky Mountain Power to relocate the lines. No other responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal but stated additional review and permits would be required if the property is developed. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Salt Lake City Code). 14.52.020 - The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A - Lack of Use- The City’s legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way. B - Public Safety- The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity or unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area. C - Urban Design- The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element. D - Community Purpose- The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. Planning staff found the requested alley vacation complies with policy consideration A-Lack of Use. PUBLIC PROCESS September 14, 2023 – o The Ballpark Community Council was sent a 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council did not provide comments. o Neighbors within 300 feet of the site were provided early notification of the proposal. No comments were received. August 29, 2024 – o Public hearing notice mailed, posted on City and State websites, and posted on Planning Division listserv. o Public hearing notice sign posted on the property. September 11, 2024 – Planning Commission review and public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. October 16, 2024 – Draft ordinance sent to the Attorney’s Office. October 30, 2024 – Signed ordinance sent to Planning Division from Attorney’s Office. November 27, 2024 – Transmittal received in City Council Office Page | 7 The process for closing or vacating a City-owned alley is outlined in Section 14.52 Salt Lake City Code. 14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS: The city supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part, with regard to city owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth herein. 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS: The city will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A. Lack Of Use: The city's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right of way; B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; or D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS: There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of city owned alleys under this section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council. A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The city administration will determine whether or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements: 1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property; 2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition; 3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located; 4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60 of this code; and 5. The appropriate city processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has been paid. Page | 7 B. Public Hearing and Recommendation From The Planning Commission: Upon receipt of a complete petition, a public hearing shall be scheduled before the Planning Commission to consider the proposed disposition of the City owned alley property. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall make a report and recommendation to the City Council on the proposed disposition of the subject alley property. A positive recommendation should include an analysis of the following factors: 1. The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division, and all other relevant City departments and divisions have no reasonable objection to the proposed disposition of the property; 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; 3. Granting the petition will not deny sole access or required off street parking to any property adjacent to the alley; 4. Granting the petition will not result in any property being landlocked; 5. Granting the petition will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses; 6. No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed within twelve (12) months of issuance of the building permit; 7. The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and 8. The alley property is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses. C. Public Hearing Before The City Council: Upon receipt of the report and recommendation from the Planning Commission, the City Council will consider the proposed petition for disposition of the subject alley property. After a public hearing to consider the matter, the City Council will make a decision on the proposed petition based upon the factors identified above. (Ord. 58-13, 2013: Ord. 24-11, 2011) 14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION: If the City Council grants the petition, the City owned alley property will be disposed of as follows: A. Low Density Residential Areas: If the alley property abuts properties which are zoned for low density residential use, the alley will merely be vacated. For the purposes of this section, "low density residential use" shall mean properties which are zoned for single-family, duplex or twin home residential uses. B. High Density Residential Properties And Other Nonresidential Properties: If the alley abuts properties which are zoned for high density residential use or other nonresidential uses, the alley will be closed and abandoned, subject to payment to the city of the fair market value of that alley property, based upon the value added to the abutting properties. C. Mixed Zoning: If an alley abuts both low density residential properties and either high density residential properties or nonresidential properties, those portions which abut the low density Page | 8 residential properties shall be vacated, and the remainder shall be closed, abandoned and sold for fair market value. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW: Any party aggrieved by the decision of the City Council as to the disposition of City owned alley property may file a petition for review of that decision within thirty (30) days after the City Council's decision becomes final, in the 3rd District Court. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/21/2024 Date Sent to Council: 11/27/2024 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Booth, Meagan E-mail meagan.booth@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 11/26/2024 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 11/27/2024 Subject: Alley Vacation at approximately 373 W American Ave – PLNPCM2023-00636 Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Meagan Booth, Principal Planner, Planning Division Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: The City Council should follow the Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve the ordinance to Vacate the Alley located at approximately 373 W American Ave with specific conditions of approval (see Attachment 1). Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will the City Council need to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process See Attachment 1. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL RECOMMENDATION: The City Council follows the Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve the ordinance to Vacate the Alley located at approximately 373 W American Ave with the following conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall establish a utility easement in place of the existing public alley right-of-way following the approval of the request or coordinate relocation of the existing power lines with Rocky Mountain Power. 2. The applicant shall establish a 10-foot-wide public access easement along the eastern boundary of 337 W American Ave. 3. The applicant shall not purport to convey the property encompassing any portion of the alley until at least 60 days after a final decision by the City Council on the petition 4. The applicant must consolidate the parcels through a lot consolidation BUDGET IMPACT: None BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Jarod Hall submitted this Alley Vacation application as the representative of the owner of three of the four properties that abut the alley. The subject alley is approximately 11.45 feet wide and 135 feet long. The alley runs through the parking area of 373 West between the abutting properties and terminates at the southernmost property boundary. The alley cannot be used as a mid block connection because the 900 South viaduct is directly to the south. The contact for this application is Justin Earl with American Acquisition 373 W American Ave - Subject alley highlighted in blue The properties adjacent to the alley front either American Avenue or 400 West. Currently, only the property at 373 American Avenue, which includes a main building and several accessory structures, uses the alley. The neighboring property owners have signed the application and expressed no objection to the alley being vacated. The applicant is requesting the alley’s vacation to facilitate future redevelopment of these properties. A previous owner attempted to vacate the alley through a quiet title action in 2022. A court erroneously issued a judgment granting ownership of the alley to the previous owner. To clarify that the alley remains City property unless and until the City Council approves this alley vacation application (and to create a mechanism for the alley to be conveyed to the City in the event this application is denied), the signed Notice of Public Alley included as Attachment E was required of the applicant. It is being held in escrow by the City Attorney's Office pending a decision on the application by the City Council. Alley Vacation requests require supporting signatures from at least 75% of abutting property owners. The applicant team does not own the property at 389 W American Ave, but Justin Earl, manager of American Ave Acquisition, LLC, has signed in support of the application as a representative of three property owners. Additionally, the owner of the 389 W American Ave property has also signed the application. Therefore, 100% of the abutting property owners are in support of vacating the alley. The Ballpark Station Area Plan aims to improve pedestrian connectivity in the area. While the alley was originally identified as a future connection, it is currently unused and has no potential for future use or expansion. To better align with the plan’s goals, an easement has been proposed in a more logical location to the east, which will enhance pedestrian access and connectivity. Also, the easement location was identified in the the future expansion of the Orange Line. The Orange Line in Salt Lake City is a proposed TRAX light rail route that would connect the Salt Lake City International Airport to the University of Utah, passing through downtown. It is currently in the planning phase, with no physical route constructed yet. The City Council’s approval of the alley vacation is an important step in making better use of the space and supporting community growth. Alley vacation requests must satisfy at least one of the four policy considerations listed in provision 14.52.020 of the City ordinance. Staff has determined that this request meets Consideration A: Lack of Use. While the City’s legal interest in the alley is shown on the subdivision plat, the alley no longer functions as a public right-of-way. This decision helps move plans forward for new development while considering the needs of residents and the city’s future. It’s a positive step toward improving the area for everyone. Alley vacation requests must satisfy the at least one of the four policy considerations listed in provision 14.52.020 of City ordinance. Staff finds that the proposed alley vacation satisfies consideration A, Lack of Use: The City’s legal interest in the alley is reflected on the applicable subdivision plat, but it is evident that the alley no longer functions as public right-of-way. Subject alley and proposed easement highlighted in blue. Connectivity Map excerpt – Page 21, Ballpark Station Area Plan PUBLIC PROCESS: •Early Notification o September 14, 2023 – The Ballpark Community Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council did not provide comments. o September 14, 2023– Neighbors within 300 feet of the site were provided early notification of the proposal. No comments were received. o August 29, 2024 – Public hearing notice mailed, posted on City and State websites, and posted on Planning Division list serve. o August 29, 2024Public hearing notice sign posted on the property o September 11, 2024–The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for this request. By a vote of, they forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed Alley Vacation with several conditions. •Planning Commission Meeting o The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing. The hearing can be viewed here beginning at 3:33:48. There were no public comments and no questions or concerns from the Commission. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval as proposed. The Planning Commission staff report can be found here. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of September 11, 2024 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of September 11, 2024 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of September 11, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3.Original Petition 4.Mailing List 5.Notice of Public Alley TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.ORDINANCE 2.PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 4.ORIGINAL PETITION 5.MAILING LIST 1.ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 202__ (Vacating a city-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at 373 W American Ave, 337 W American Ave, 389 W American Ave, 965 S 400 W, and 969 S 400 W) An ordinance vacating an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to properties located at 373 W American Ave, 337 W American Ave, 389 W American Ave, 965 S 400 W, and 969 S 400 W pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2023-00636. WHEREAS the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on September 11, 2024 to consider a request made by Jarod Hall (“Applicant”) to vacate an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to properties located at 373 W American Ave, 337 W American Ave, 389 W American Ave, 965 S 400 W, and 969 S 400 W (collectively, the “Property”); and WHEREAS, at its September 11, 2024 hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation of the alley and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Closing and Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley, which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this alley, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Conditions. This alley vacation is conditioned upon the following: a)The applicant shall establish a utility easement in place of the existing public alley right-of-way following the approval of the request or coordinate relocation of the existing power lines with Rocky Mountain Power. b)The applicant shall establish a 10-foot-wide public access easement along the eastern boundary of 337 W American Ave. c)The applicant shall not purport to convey the Property encompassing any portion of the alley until at least 60 days after a final decision by the City Council on the petition; d)The applicant shall consolidate the parcels comprising the Property through a lot consolidation; and e)The proposed method of disposition of the alley property shall be consistent with the method of disposition set forth in Salt Lake City Code Section 14.52.040. 3 SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 5. Time. If the condition set forth in Section 3(c) is violated, or the conditions of Section 3(a), (b), (d) and (e) above have not been met within one year after adoption, then this ordinance shall become null and void. The City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions identified above. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 202__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR 4 ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 202___ Published: ______________. Ordinance Vacating Alley Near 373 W American_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney October 30, 2024 5 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the unnamed, city-owned alley to be vacated: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Lot 19, Block 2, of the Coates & Corums Southgale Addition Subdivision, as recorded in Plat Book ‘B’, Page 104, at the Salt Lake County Recorders Office and running thence East 11.45 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 13, said Block 2; thence South 135 feet to the West, Southwest Corner of said Lot 13; thence S 45° E 7.07 feet to the South, Southwest Corner of said Lot 13; thence South 15 feet; thence West 16.45 feet to the Southeast Corner of Lot 14, said Block 2; thence North 155 feet to the point of beginning. CONTAINS 1,863 SQUARE FEET OR 0.043 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00636 August 4, 2023 Alley Vacation application submitted by TAG Private Lending, LLC (TAG). August 7, 2023 Application deemed complete by Planning Staff. August 29, 2023 Application assigned to Trevor Ovenden, Principal Planner for analysis and processing. September 14, 2023 The Ballpark Community Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council did not provide comments. Neighbors within 300 feet of the site were provided early notification of the proposal. No comments were received. November 3, 2023 TAG transferred ownership of the abutting properties to American Ave Acquisitions, LLC. November 9, 2023 During staff analysis, it was found that this alley is identified as a “Proposed Future Alleyway Connection” in the Ballpark Station Area Plan. This was communicated to the applicant at this time. The applicant began working on a proposal to provide an alternative connection through the block. February 7, 2024 The application team provided an updated proposal that includes a 10-foot- wide pedestrian access easement along the eastern edge of 337 W and the unused rail tracks to the east. Public hearing notice mailed, posted on City and State websites, and posted on Planning Division list serve. August 29, 2024 Public hearing notice sign posted on the property. September 11, 2024 The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing for this request. By a vote of, they forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed Alley Vacation with several conditions. 3.NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00636, Alley Vacation at approximately 373 W American Ave. Jarod Hall submitted this Alley Vacation application as the representative of the owner of three of the four properties that abut the alley. The subject alley is approximately 11.45 feet wide and 135 feet long. The alley runs along the western side of 373 West and terminates at the southernmost property boundary. The alley cannot be used as a midblock connection because the 900 South viaduct is directly to the south. The property owners intend to close the alley to public use to allow for future redevelopment of this site. The subject alley is located within the CG General Commercial District and is within Council District 5, represented by Darin Mano. (Staff contact: Meagan Booth at 801-535-7213 or meagan.booth@slc.gov ). As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Meagan Booth at 801-535-7213 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e- mail at meagan.booth@slc.gov The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2023-00636. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 4.ORIGINAL PETITION DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 * AMERICAN AVENUE Alley Closure Application Alley Closure Letter RE: 373 W American Ave, 963 S 400 W, 969 S 400 W, Salt Lake City, UT Parcel Numbers: 15-12-183-002-0000 15-12-183-012-0000 15-12-183-014-0000 To Whom it may concern; On behalf of the TAG Private Lending, LLC, I am submitting this application to vacate the alleyway outlined within this application. The alleyway area abuts 3 parcels all owned by the same entity. A quite title action was completed on or around 10/26/2022 and the county updated the plat maps on or around 12/31/2022 reflecting the new property boundaries. It was brought to our attention after the quiet title action was completed that the city may have a historic claim on the alleyway. The city desires that we take this through an alley vacation process. The intent of the property owner is to continue to use the alleyway for access as well as authority to maintain, secure and police the area. Thank you Jarod Hall Di’velept J@divelept.com 801-680-4485 DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 Demonstration of appropriateness of vacating alley way 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 1. Lack Of Use: The City’s legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an onsite inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; Response: the alley area has been used by the adjacent property owners for an excess 20 of years. The alleyways do not provide access to another property. A portion of the building built in 1964 located at 373 W American Ave was built on a portion of the alley area. 2. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; Response: The alley way terminates into the owner’s property and people experiencing homelessness as well as people looking for theft and vandalism opportunities frequent the area. 3. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; Response: This is apparent based on the existing conditions of the buildings and the alley ways. 4. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. N/A The petition for vacation complies will items 2-8 below. The applicant has not obtained approvals from other relevant city departments yet. 14.52.030: FACTORS CONSIDERED: 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal; 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property; 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked; DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 5. The vacation will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City; 6. No abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the alley; 7. The petition is for an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and 8. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. In reference to item 2 of the application: Map and legal description Subject Parcel Legal Description DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 In reference to item 3 of the application: Description of the alleyway BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 00°14'53" WEST 63.01 FEET AND SOUTH 89°48'03" EAST 159.16 FEET FROM THE STREET MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF 400 WEST AND AMERICAN AVENUE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK 2, COATES & CORUMS SOUTH GALE ADDITION, ON FILE WITH THE OFFICE OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY RECORDER IN BOOK B, AT PAGE 104 OF PLATS, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 89°48'03" EAST 11.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°15'21" WEST 105.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44°46'18" EAST 7.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°15'21" WEST 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°47'58" WEST 16.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°15'21" EAST 125.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 1,519 SQUARE FEET OR 0.035 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. In reference to item 4 of the application: Adjacent property owners. TAG Private Lending, LLC is the only adjacent property owner. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION // v2.15.23 1 ABOUT THE APPLICATION Thank you for your interest in submitting an Alley Vacation or Closure application. The following packet will provide general information to get started on your project and guide you through the application process from start to finish. The package is broken down into three sections: Information about the application, a visual diagram of the application process, and the application form. We highly encourage you to work with our Planning staff prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding any of the information listed in this packet or to set up a pre-submittal meeting please contact us at zoning@slcgov.com or give us a call at 801.535.7757. PLANNING PROCESS // ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 SLC.GOV/PLANNING ZONING@SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7757 1 2 3 Important Process Information Process Timeline Application Form DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION // v2.15.23 2 WHAT THE CITY CONSIDERS BEFORE AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A. Lack Of Use: The City’s legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. 14.52.030: FACTORS CONSIDERED: 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal; 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property; 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked; 5. The vacation will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City; 6. No abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the alley; 7. The petition is for an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and 8. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. WHAT IS AN ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE? As part of the subdivision process, early developers were required to create alleys which were then deeded to the City. They were used for coal delivery, garbage pickup and other services. They also allowed access to garages. Today, when an alley is shown on a plat as a public right of way, it means the City is the owner. In situations where it can be demonstrated that there is an over-riding public purpose for vacating the alley, the City may relinquish its property interest in the alley. When an alley is next to or abuts a single family or duplex residential property, the City vacates the alley, divides it in half, and the property is conveyed to the abutting property owners. If an alley is next to or abuts a non-residential, or multifamily residential (3 or more dwelling units) property, the City may close the alley and then sell the land at fair market value to the abutting property owners. CONSULTATION If you have questions regarding the Alley Vacation or Closure regulations or process, please contact the Salt Lake City Planning Counter staff at zoning@slcgov.com or give us a call at 801-535-7757. If you would like to discuss your development plan in more detail, you can request a pre-submittal meeting with Planning staff by contacting the Planning Counter. Pre-submittal meetings are held on Thursdays in 30 minute slots between 1:30 and 3:30 pm. IMPORTANT PROCESS INFORMATION 14.52 O R D I N A N C E DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 PROCESS TIMELINE TRANSMITTAL OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS (CAN) Commission minute approval and public record are assembled by staff. After review, the package is transmitted to City Council. 21 days APPLICATION RECEIVED Application submitted and pre-screened to ensure submittal requirements are met and fees are paid. 1 2 4 3 6 PLANNER ASSIGNED Application reviewed by Planner to ensure complete documentation (if incomplete, the applicant will be provided a list of missing info to submit). PUBLIC NOTICE Public notices sent to nearby neighbors, property owners and Community Councils (when required by ordinance). Application routed to City Departments for review. APPLICATION MODIFICATIONS Modifications based on public input & City Department review comments (if needed, applicant must submit updates). Minor issues will be conditions of approval. CITY COUNCIL PROCESS City Council holds a briefing with staff during work session. Public hearing and action follows. Timeline determined by City Council office. www.slc.gov/council PLANNING COMMISSION Public hearing scheduled and held, notices sent, staff report produced and commission recommendation made. 45 days 14 days 21 days 6 - 12 MONTHS T I M E F R A M E 5 APPLICANT STAFF DISCLAIMER: APPLICATION TIME FRAMES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON CURRENT WORKLOAD AND COMPLEXITY OF APPLICATIONS. INCOMPLETE OR MISSING INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS AND APPLICATION FORMS WILL DELAY THE PROCESS. 7 DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION // v2.15.23 4 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. REQUIRED FEES •$285 filing fee. •Additional required notice fees will be assessed after application is received. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. I M P O R T A N T I N F O R M A T I O N ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. Owner Contractor* Other*Architect* REQUEST CASE NUMBER MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner’s consent required) A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N O F F I C E U S E LOCATION OF ALLEY PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) EMAIL PHONE PHONE EMAIL IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST American Ave Alley Vacation Running north south from american ave south to aproximately 20’ north of the UDOT ROW and a small portion running east to west To vacate the alley area Jarod Hall 801-680-4485 454 N 600 W, Salt Lake City UT 84116 j@divelept.com TAG Private Lending, LLC 801-505-8105 P.O. Box 520697 Salt Lake Lake City UT 84152 Jordan@tagslc.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION // v2.15.23 5 NAME OF OWNER EMAIL PHONEMAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS APPLICATION TYPE A C K N O W L E D G M E N T O F R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y L E G A L P R O P E R T Y O W N E R C O N S E N T NAME OF APPLICANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY EMAIL SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE 1.This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2.By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3.I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4.I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. If the applicant is not the legal owner of the property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. 1.If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2.If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3.If a Home Owner’s Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PART 5. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. Jarod Hall j@divelept.com j@divelept.com 801-680-4485 Alley Vacation See attached full legal description TAG Private Lending, LLC Jordan@tagslc.com P.O. Box 520697 Salt Lake Lake City UT 84152 DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 8/4/2023 | 4:37 PM MDT 8/4/2023 | 4:37 PM MDT ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION // v2.15.23 6 The name, address and signatures of all abutting property owners who support the petition. • Petition must include the signatures of no less than 75% of the abutting property owners. • Signatures should be from the property owners and not from the property renters. • You may use the form attached to this application or provide your own form with signatures. A letter explaining why you are requesting this alley vacation or closure. • The letter must include a discussion about the policy considerations and factors outlined in page 2. A Parcel map showing the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure: • Highlight the area of the proposed alley vacation or closure. • Indicate with colored dot the property owners who support the petition. • Submit a digital (PDF) copy of the map. A written description with measurements of the proposed alley vacation or closure. • A final legal description prepared by a licensed engineer will be required later. REQUIREMENTS (14.52.030.A) RECOMMENDED CHECK STAFF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please provide the following information with your application. Confirm that you have included each of the requirements listed below by adding a check mark for each item. I N C O M P L E T E I N F O R M A T I O N W I L L N O T B E A C C E P T E D INITIALS DISCLAIMER: I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SALT LAKE CITY REQUIRES THE ITEMS ABOVE TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE MY APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED. I UNDERSTAND THAT PLANNING WILL NOT ACCEPT MY APPLICATION UNLESS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 DISCLAIMER: AS AN OWNER OF PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY, I AGREE TO THE PROPOSED VACATION OR CLOSURE. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF MY PROPERTY IS A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OR A RENTAL PROPERTY WITH MORE THAN THREE (3) DWELLING UNITS, I WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR MY HALF OF THE ALLEY. PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME PRINT NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE NAME OF APPLICANT ADDRESS OF APPLICANT DATE PETITION FOR ALLEY VACATION OR CLOSURE A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N Jarod Hall 454 N 600 W Salt Lake City UT 84116 TAG Private Lending, LLC 373 W American Ave, Salt Lake City UT 965 S 400 W, Salt Lake City UT 969 S 400 W, Salt Lake City UT TAG Private Lending, LLC TAG Private Lending, LLC DocuSign Envelope ID: 4687CC42-6363-4135-BEC4-1172A1CE3CB9 8/4/2023 | 4:37 PM MDT 8/4/2023 | 4:37 PM MDT 8/4/2023 | 4:37 PM MDT 5. MAILING LIST Name Address Unit City State Zip GRANARY MONTAGUE LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITYUT 84109 RUECO, LLC 4267 SUMMERMEADOW DR BOUNTIFULUT 84010 AMERICAN PHOENIX, LLC 8907 S QUAIL HOLLOW DR SANDY UT 84093 SALT LAKE CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84114 AMERICAN PHOENIX, LLC 372 W AMERICAN AVE SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 BROOKLYN DEVELOPMENT,L.L.C. 3150 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITYUT 84104 ASHOKA GROUP I, LLC 4512 S GILEAD WY SALT LAKE CITYUT 84124 GRANARY MONTAGUE, LP 406 W FAYETTE AVE SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 GRANARY MONTAGUE LLC 15 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 MOUNTAIN CREST PROPERTIESLLC 3150 W 900 S SALT LAKE CITYUT 84104 GRANARY MONTAGUE, LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITYUT 84109 LONGMIRE, DOUGLAS 961 S 400 W SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 UTAH FIDUCIARIES, LLC 1099 N KILLYONS LN EMIGRATN CYNUT 84108 ANNEX MANAGEMENT, LLC 1901 S 500 E SALT LAKE CITYUT 84105 SALT LAKE PROPERTY TRUTAH FIDUCIARIES, LLC; TR 337 W AMERICAN AVE SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 A PLUS AUTO CENTER LLC 945 S GALE ST SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 3AM LLC 1099 S WINDSOR ST SALT LAKE CITYUT 84105 INFINITE INCEPTION INC.2377 E QUAIL HOLLOW DR SANDY UT 84093 1030 SALT LAKE CITY, LLCCPCU LLC; INT 1000 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITYUT 84101 Current Occupant 401 W 900 S Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 927 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 933 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 390 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 920 S GALE ST Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 924 S GALE ST Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 944 S GALE ST Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 948 S GALE ST Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 950 S GALE ST Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 404 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 402 W FAYETTE AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 954 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 965 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 389 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 373 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 357 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 355 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 969 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 331 W AMERICAN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 982 S 400 W Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 360 W ASPEN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 Current Occupant 320 W BROOKLYN AVE Salt Lake CityUT 84101 This page has intentionally been left blank Item C3 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE:MOTION SHEET – Public Lands Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 W 200 N (West High Rebuild Related Zoning Amendments) MOTION 1 I move the Council adopt ordinances amending the text for the Public Lands zoning district and vacating a portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West. MOTION 2 I move the Council reject the ordinances. MOTION 3 I move the Council postpone action to a future Council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE:Public Lands Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 W 200 N (West High Rebuild Related Zoning Amendments) PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: August 19, 2025 Set Date: August 19, 2025 Public Hearing: Sept 2, 2025 Potential Action: Sept 9, 2025 PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY Four people spoke during the September 2 public hearings about the proposed changes. They expressed concerns that the proposed design for the new school is not consistent with city plans and about the impact to the historic neighborhoods along 200 west / 200 north due to increased vehicle traffic accessing the new parking. Others said the preservation of the historic West High should have been more important for the school district. Some encouraged the Council to vote against the street vacation hoping this would prevent the construction from going forward. Council Members recommended the community members continue reaching out to the School District with their concerns about the design for the new high school and mentioned an open house on September 9,. The Council closed the public hearing and deferred action to a future Council meeting. The Council is tentatively scheduled to take action on September 9. The following information was provided for the September 2 public hearing. It is provided again for background purposes. Page | 2 WORK SESSION SUMMARY The Council didn’t raise any significant concerns or question during the August 19 briefing. Some questions were raised about the height and setbacks near residential properties. School District staff in attendance noted the highest the buildings will be is about 84’ tall. Some areas will be up to 98’ to accommodate stairwells and access to the roof. Questions were also raised about landscaping and buffers, as well as potential sidewalk improvements. Planning staff noted that state code strictly limits what municipalities can regulate when it comes to school construction. The public hearing for the zoning amendments and street vacation is scheduled for September 2. The following information was provided for the August 19 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposed Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School. The proposed changes include: a.Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Case Number: PLNPCM2025-00320 b.Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 N between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Case Number: PLNPCM2025-00321 Mayor Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the Public Lands Zoning District to enact Temporary Land Use Regulations (TLUR) adopted by the City Council in March 2025 on a permanent basis. Those changes are: 1.Max building height up to 125 feet for public schools. 2.Setbacks decreased when next to any zoning district that isn’t residential. 3.Allowed obstructions in required yards introduced. 4.K-12 Public Schools exempted from Historic Preservation Overlay District Provisions. 5.Any K-12 public school alteration will be approved by the Planning Division. 6.Modifications for Health and Safety Purposes are permitted according to the planning director. The Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation for the text amendment and a positive recommendation for the street vacation. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page | 3 Below is a summary of the key changes, See pages XXXX of the transmittal letter for further information. STREET CLOSURE PROCESS The street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference. 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (1)In lieu of vacating some or all of a public street through a plat or amended plat in accordance with Sections 10-9a-603 through 10-9a-609, a legislative body may approve a petition to vacate a public street in accordance with this section. (2)A petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement shall include: (a)the name and address of each owner of record of land that is: (i)adjacent to the public street or municipal utility easement between the two nearest public street intersections; or (ii)accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public street or municipal utility easement; (b)proof of written notice to operators of utilities and culinary water or sanitary sewer facilities located within the bounds of the public street or municipal utility easement sought to be vacated; and (c)the signature of each owner under Subsection (2)(a) who consents to the vacation. (3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a- 208 and determine whether: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. (4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. (5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land is located: (a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or (b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and Page | 4 (ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated. (6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that has been dedicated to public use: (a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public street or municipal utility easement; and (b)may not be construed to impair: (i)any right-of-way or easement of any parcel or lot owner; (ii)the rights of any public utility; or (iii)the rights of a culinary water authority or sanitary sewer authority. (7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a process to vacate some or all of a public street. (b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a): (i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing; (ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent: (A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27; (B)the easement is included within the public street; and (C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and (iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street through a recorded plat or amended plat. (8)A legislative body may not approve a petition to vacate a public street under this section unless the vacation identifies and preserves any easements owned by a culinary water authority and sanitary sewer authority for existing facilities located within the public street. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/29/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Amann, Grant E-mail grant.amann@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/06/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/07/2025 Subject: Zoning Text Amendment - PL Public Lands AND Street Vacation - Approx. 200 N 240 W Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Grant Amann, Grant.Amann@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Deny the Public Lands Zoning Text Amendment as recommended by Planning Commission and approve the 200 North Street Vacation as Recommended by Planning Commission Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Both petitions include City Code Ordinances that require approval by City Council during a public hearing after recommendation from Planning Commission. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director RECOMMENDATION: PLNPCM2025-00320 - Deny Public Lands text amendment as recommended by Planning Commission. PLNPCM2025-00321 - Approve the 200 North Street Vacation as recommended by Planning Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal includes two separate petitions. PLNPCM2025-00320 is a text amendment specific to the Public Lands Zoning District. Th is requested text amendment is necessary to achieve the 2024 High School Bonded Improvements. In November of 2024, a High School Improvement Bond was approved by voters in Salt Lake City. The ballot title was as follows, “Shall the Board of Education of Salt Lake City School District, Utah, be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $730,000,000 and to mature in no more than twenty-one (21) years from the date or dates of issuance of such bonds for the purpose of raising money for constructing and acquiring buildings and furnishings and remodeling and updating existing school property, under the charge of the Board, and, to the extent necessary, for providing moneys for the refunding, at or prior to the maturity thereof, of general obligation bonds of the Board authorized hereunder or heretofore issued and now outstanding?” As a result of this bond approval, the Salt Lake City Council adopted temporary land use regulations (TLUR) on February 18th of 2025 (published on February 27, 2025). These temporary land use regulations were adopted with the purpose of facilitating the improvement bond. These temporary land use regulations were necessary to enable the redevelopment of K-12 public schools located within the Public Lands Zoning District. It is anticipated that the school district will receive site plan approval for the new Highland High and West High while the temporary land use regulations are in effect. This text amendment seeks to codify the amendments to the Public Lands Zoning District initiated by the temporary land use regulations (TLUR). These amendments altered the zoning requirements that apply to K-12 public schools, including increasing the maximum height, decreasing setbacks, allowing certain school related equipment in required yards, and exempting K-12 public schools from any provisions required by the Historic Preservation Overlay District. These amendments allow K-12 public schools more flexibility, but they also bring the requirements for the PL zoning district closer to the existing reality for K-12 schools that were built prior to the requirements of the district. The street vacation is specifically related to improvements for West High School and would ease its redevelopment. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed. Text Amendment to the PL – Public Lands Zoning District The following changes apply only to the specific “Schools, K-12 Public” use: A. The maximum building height increased to 125 feet. B. Interior side and rear yard setbacks decreased from 50’ to 30’ when adjacent to zoning districts that are not residential or manufacturing. C. Allowed obstructions in required yards introduced. D. K-12 Public Schools exempted from any provisions required by the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E. Any k-12 public school alteration will be approved by the Planning Division. F. Modifications for Health and Safety Purposes are permitted according to the planning director. Street Vacation The second application, PLNPCM2025-00321, is a partial street vacation for a portion of 200 North currently occupied by recreational uses associated with West High School. It is approximately 130 feet wide and 445 feet long. The current use of 200 N is regulated by a 1987 lease agreement between the School District and Salt Lake City. The street vacation is requested to relinquish public interest in the specified portion of the public street and to create a legitimate parcel of land. The parcel of land would be consolidated as part of a larger effort to consolidate the many parcels that make up West High School’s campus. The School District has not indicated intentions to build on the vacated portion of land, but rather, to use it as paved vehicular access for the property to the north of the former street. Map of the proposed street vacation. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community Councils on May 15, 2025 • The Planning Commission public hearing was held on July 9, 2025 o The Planning Commission voted 5-3 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the text amendment proposal. o The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the street vacation proposal as requested by the applicant. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of July, 9 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance for Public Lands – PL Zoning Text Amendment: Final and Legislative Versions 2. Ordinance for 200 N Street Vacation: Final and Legislative Versions 3. Project Chronology 4. Notice of City Council Hearing 5. Original Petition 6. Public Comment Received After the Planning Commission Staff Report was published 7. Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC LANDS – PL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2. ORDINANCE FOR 200 N STREET VACATION 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 5. PETITION INITIATION 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST This page has intentionally been left blank 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00320 – Public Lands Zoning Text Amendment November 6, 2024 Voters of Salt Lake City approved a $730,000,000 general obligation bond to rebuild two high schools, construct an athletic field house, and to make sustainability upgrades at schools and facilities throughout the school district February 18, 2025 The Temporary Land Use Regulations are Adopted by City Council April 2, 2025 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake City Planning Division May 8, 2025 Petitions PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025-00321 were assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. May 15, 2025 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized community councils, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. June 19, 2025 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at various library public noticing points city wide. June 29, 2025 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. July 9, 2025 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a negative recommendation 5-3 to deny the proposed text amendment. The Commission then votes 7-1 to recommend approval of the proposed street vacation. July 16, 2025 Planning Department requested the official Ordinance language from the City Attorney’s office. July 29, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s office This page has intentionally been left blank 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025- 00321- In response to the passing of the 2024 High School Improvement Bond and the associated temporary land use regulations (TLUR) by the City Council in February of 2025, Mayor Mendenhall is requesting to amend the Public Lands Zoning District. This amendment impacts Chapters 21A.32.070, 21A.36.020, and 21A.34.020 and would make the TLUR adopted by City Council permanent. By doing so, the city’s zoning regulations will be updated to support changes to the PL (Public Lands) zoning district, associated with public schools. The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from Historic Landmark Commission review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Additionally, the second petition is street vacation for an approximately 130- foot-wide and 445-foot-long portion of 200 N between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: TIME: PLACE: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00320 The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIP BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HALVARD G GRONDAHL; LORINE K GRONDAHL (JT) ONDAHL (JT)239 W 300 N REAR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 RACHEL MARIE OSBORNE RIE OSBORNE 233 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TONI JONES FELTON TRUST 08/12/2022 08/12/2022 229 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JOHN S KEYES OHN S KEYES 225 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JL EATON, LLC EATON, LLC 515 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 RITA S LUND RITA S LUND 2784 E CANYON VIEW DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 TYLER PETERSON; ALISON PETERSON (JT) TERSON (JT)257 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JONATHAN NOVAK; PAULA SENBOUTARATH (JT) TARATH (JT)255 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MARLINDA THOMPSON DA THOMPSON 273 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NEVA T NIELSEN A T NIELSEN 10168 S REDWOOD RD SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 STH WENDELL, LLC ENDELL, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BARLEY II LIMITED, LLC IMITED, LLC 186 E DORCHESTER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 BRENDA LYNNETTE STEPHENS; LELAND THOMAS STEPHENS (JT) EPHENS (JT)225 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ANNETTE AIKO HORIUCHI FAMILY TRUST 05/04/2021 05/04/2021267 N 980 E LINDON UT 84042 MARMALADE HILL PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 512 SUGAR PLUM LN NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 CHERRY APTS LLC RY APTS LLC 2855 WASHINGTON BLVD OGDEN UT 84401 VILLAGE MARMALADE, LLC MALADE, LLC 223 W 700 S # 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANGELA M HANNA ELA M HANNA 1101 JACKSON ST OMAHA NE 68102 INSAN 232 NORTH, LLC NORTH, LLC PO BOX 657 VENICE CA 90294 JOHN MAXIM JOHN MAXIM 226 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ALEXANDER DULWICK DER DULWICK 222 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 KRISTA A NABAUM TA A NABAUM 216 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DELANY KAMMEYER FAMILY TRUST 10/23/1997 10/23/1997256 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MBKU LLC MBKU LLC 1231 MICKEY LANE E MONMOUTH OR 97361 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 251 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANCOCK LIVING TRUST 04/15/2019 04/15/2019 245 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MCDB2, LLC MCDB2, LLC 923 E EXECUTIVE PARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 BROWNSTONE CONDMN COMMON AREA MASTER CARD MASTER CARD5530 RACQUET LANE BOULDER CO 80303 ERIK JOHNSON; JULIE JOHNSON (JT) OHNSON (JT)8630 N HWY 38 HONEYVILLE UT 84314 GUS G CHAUS; KIMBERLY REESE (JT) REESE (JT)11191 S MIDAS TRAIL RD SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 MNS & BJS FM TR & BJS FM TR 166 W 200 N # 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SCOTT HYER; CHRISTIE POWELL (JT) POWELL (JT)491 ISLAND VIEW CIR FARMINGTON UT 84025 BOSS FAMILY TRUST 4/21/2022 T 4/21/2022 5530 RACQUET LN BOULDER CO 80303 MARMALADES HOA MALADES HOA 208 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CHRISTOPHER KANAAN PHER KANAAN 208 N 200 W 208 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MASON D BREWER ON D BREWER 208 N 200 W 208 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CAPITOL TWO, LLC OL TWO, LLC 366 DOLORES ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94110 SANE LLC SANE LLC 13830 SAXON LAKE DR JACKSONVILLE FL 32225 BASES LOADED INVESTING, LLC ESTING, LLC 230 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CAMERON SAPPA MERON SAPPA 206 N 200 W 206 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ERIKA PL FINLAYSON TRUST 11/18/2021 11/18/2021 206 N 200 W 206 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 BRIAN D SILKEY AN D SILKEY 206 N 200 W 206 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COLBY JONES; RACHAEL L JONES (JT) JONES (JT)206 N 200 W 206 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 NORTH TEMPLE ENTERPRISES, LLC PRISES, LLC PO BOX 4697 LOGAN UT 84323 KATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INC RPRISES INC 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CITY CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLC CIATES, LLC 95 W 100 S #340 LOGAN UT 84321 DANIEL HARRISON BARNES ISON BARNES 1544 E 800 N LEHI UT 84043 JACK B SMITH ACK B SMITH 14641 KING CANYON VICTORVILLE CA 92392 MAVERIK COUNTRY STORES INC STORES INC 185 S STATE ST # 800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORP OF PRES. BISH. OF THE CH OF J C OF LDS J C OF LDS50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 WESTERN ROCKY COMPANY CKY COMPANY 2001 UNION ST # 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 UTAH DOORS, LLC SERIES 161 SERIES 161 4607 W DAYBREAK PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 RIVERDALE COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC LDINGS, LLC 95 W 100 S LOGAN UT 84321 ELIA TULE ELIA TULE 216 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 EUGENE F SASSER NE F SASSER 1765 PEACHTREE ST NE #B3 ATLANTA GA 30309 PIETRA PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 273 N 1550 E LAYTON UT 84040 MARILYN E BRANHAM REVOCABLE TRUST 11/30/2017 11/30/20178203 WHETSTONE RD MOUNTAIN GRV MO 65711 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 14485 SHADOWLANE CT MORGAN HILL CA 95037 ARNOLD L SWINDLEHURST; KAREN A SWINDLEHURST (JT) EHURST (JT)17 WHITMAN CT IRVINE CA 92617 DAVID L NORMAN ID L NORMAN 214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST # E2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HEIDI NESTEL; STEVE NESTEL TEVE NESTEL 1380 CAPITOL ST OGDEN UT 84401 DANIEL TAYLOR LARKIN YLOR LARKIN 3411 W BOULDEN BLVD BLUFFDALE UT 84065 RACHEL PARKIN CHEL PARKIN 10 FAXON AVE APT 808 QUNICY MA 02169 NATHAN SNOW; MAREN SNOW (JT) N SNOW (JT)214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ANDRA L LALLI REVOCABLE TRUST 09/05/2006 09/05/20063070 S 950 E BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 401K HOME MOSTLY INC. MOSTLY INC.1474 BLACK STONE AVENUE SAN JOSE CA 95118 MARC KENNEDY ARC KENNEDY PO BOX 802 DRAPER UT 84020 MAREN SNOW; NATHAN SNOW (JT) N SNOW (JT)218 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 A J & M CO LLC & M CO LLC 7875 S 965 E SANDY UT 84094 GARRETT C ZUPAN ETT C ZUPAN 2131 SPRINGSTONE DR LELAND NC 28451 PAUL T BERGERA FAMILY TRUST 04/02/2001 04/02/20012666 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 214 NORTH TEMPLE CONDOMINIUMS AMD COMMON AREA MASTER CARD MASTER 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 CORP OF PRES. BIS. OF THE CH OF J C OF LDS J C OF LDS50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #FL22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 PROPERTY RESERVE, INC ESERVE, INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151 Current Occupant 241 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 288 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 270 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 266 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 262 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 267 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 251 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 217 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 279 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 271 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 244 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 276 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 270 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 258 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 240 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 232 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 204 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 243 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 265 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 211 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 220 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 245 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 212 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 231 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 229 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 227 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 171 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 163 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 268 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 264 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 250 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 242 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 232 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 263 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 257 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 156 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 208 N 200 W 208 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 208 N 200 W 208 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 206 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 143 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 175 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 308 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 160 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 150 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 144 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 138 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 140 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 140 N 300 W NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 116 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 112 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 102 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 274 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 264 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 250 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 248 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 242 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 230 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 279 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 275 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 261 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 213 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 211 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 209 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 165 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 107 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 206 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 180 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 125 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 133 N 200 W NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 233 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 246 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 161 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 157 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E-1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E-7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 150 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 131 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 This page has intentionally been left blank 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED From: Colin K Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 8:16 AM To: planning@slc.gov; Amann, Grant; Wharton, Chris Subject: (EXTERNAL) Formal Opposition: Zoning Cases PLNPCM2025-00320 & PLNPCM2025-00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Salt Lake City Planning Commission, I am a resident and property owner at 216 N 200 W and a deeply concerned member of the community. I am writing to formally submit my strong opposition to the proposed Zoning Text Amendment (PLNPCM2025-00320) and the Street Vacation (PLNPCM2025-00321) related to the West High School rebuild. These changes will permanently and negatively impact the quality of life and the historic fabric of our neighborhood. My opposition is based on several critical concerns: * **Impact on Neighborhood Traffic and Parking:** We understand that a significant portion of the new parking will be located on the northwest side of the campus, directly adjacent to our residential streets. This will increase traffic, noise, and congestion in our residential areas, impacting the daily lives of families. * **Extreme Building Height and Reduced Setbacks:** The proposal to allow a new school structure up to **125 feet tall** and as close as **30 feet** from our property lines is completely out of scale with the surrounding residential homes. This change will block sunlight, create a massive visual burden, and eliminate privacy for countless residents. * **Abandonment of Historic Preservation Standards:** Granting an exemption from historic preservation review is a severe blow to the integrity of our historic district. The new construction should be required to respect the character of the neighborhood, not be built as a monolithic, incompatible structure that ignores its surroundings. I grew up in this neighborhood. I graduated from West High. I understand the need for a new high school. But Option 3 is not the best option for the neighborhood or the West High Students of the future. Option 3 places the new burdens on the neighborhood, splits the school across an extremely busy street and will have to be redone in future. Spend the money now and do it right. I urge you to deny these petitions and recommend to the City Council that they do not approve these changes. Please prioritize the preservation of our neighborhood over institutional convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Colin Kingsbury Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: LARRY HANCOCK Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:24 PM To: Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: Case #'s PLNPCM2025-00320/ PLNPCM2025- 00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ---------- Original Message ---------- From: LARRY HANCOCK To: "planning@slc.gov" <planning@slc.gov> Date: 06/30/2025 1:19 PM MDT Subject: Case #'s PLNPCM2025-00320/ PLNPCM2025-00321 I have grave concerns about the rezoning along lower Quince and 2nd west from 2nd north to 3rd north. It is not necessary to ruin the historic nature of this area and i oppose the removal of our historic designation. Sincerely Larry Hancock 245N. Quince Street Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: Marie Leon Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 9:44 PM To: Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) Feedback on Proposed Zoning Changes Near West High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Salt Lake City Planning Division, I recently visited Salt Lake City for the first time, and during my stay, I spent a lot of time exploring the Marmalade neighborhood. I absolutely fell in love with it. The historic homes, the tree-lined streets, the small local shops — it all had such a welcoming, unique character that made it stand out from so many other neighborhoods I’ve visited. While I was there, I happened to notice a flyer about the proposed zoning changes near West High School. Even as a visitor, it caught my attention because one of the things that struck me most during my time in Marmalade was the presence of that beautiful, historic high school. It felt like such an important part of the neighborhood’s identity and history. It honestly made me sad to read that these changes could allow buildings much taller than anything that exists there now, reduce buffers that give the area its open feel, and bypass the historic review process that helps keep neighborhoods like Marmalade so special. I understand that growth and updates are part of every city’s future, but this felt like the kind of change that could alter the neighborhood permanently, and not in a good way. I may not live in Salt Lake City, but I can tell you that neighborhoods like Marmalade are what make a city worth visiting. It would be a real loss to see its historic charm replaced by oversized buildings that don’t reflect the community’s history and character. Thank you for taking the time to hear feedback from a visitor who left with a real appreciation for what makes your city so special. I hope you will protect the unique feel of Marmalade as you make decisions about this proposal. Sincerely, Marie California Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: Marlinda Thompson Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 10:49 AM To: planning@slc.gov; Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025-00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Attention: This is regarding the building of the West High School specifically and the height and set- back distance of the new structures. I live close to where the proposed new structures will be constructed. I have lived in the neighborhood for 25 years and I do not want such significant changes. Please do not allow buildings to be built that would tower over my home and the rest of the homes by what—6 times their height? And 30 feet is much too close. This is where I live; this is where I walk; this is where I meet and talk with my neighbors. I do not want to live in the shadow of tall buildings. This is a quaint neighborhood with historic homes and buildings. Please, let us preserve these homes and buildings and historical significance. Perhaps we could build on the existing block and building where West High is located at a reduced height. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Marlinda Thompson This page has intentionally been left blank 5. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST This page has intentionally been left blank 2. ORDINANCE FOR 200 N STREET VACATION: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Closing the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West) An ordinance vacating the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00321. WHEREAS, the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West, as legally described on Exhibit A (“Right-of-Way”), is not presently used for travel or as a public right-of-way, rather it is primarily serving as West High School’s track and field; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-9a-609.5 establishes the power for cities to vacate public rights of way subject to certain procedures, which have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on July 9, 2025 to consider a petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to vacate the Right-of-Way pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00321; and WHEREAS, at its July 9, 2025 meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation of the Right-of-Way, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating Right-of-Way. That the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West, which right-of-way is as legally described on Exhibit A, is hereby vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. The Right-of-Way is hereby converted to a parcel of land, to be within the Public Lands – PL Zoning District. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. Ordinance vacating 200 N between 200-300 Wv1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 29, 2025 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of Portion of 200 North to be vacated: Beginning at point that is S 89°52’42” E 530 feet along the south line of Block 103 and from the Southwest Corner of Lot 2, Block 103, Plat ‘A’ Salt Lake City Survey; S 0°01’06” E 6.11 feet; thence S 89°56’56” W 31.71 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 60.44 feet and a curve length of 90.45 feet s chord bearing of S 44°16’59” W and chord distance of 82.24 feet to a line of tangency; thence S 0°24’51” W 66 feet; thence S 89°58’50” E 90.81 feet along the north line of Lots 7 & 8, Block 96, Plat ‘A’ Salt Lake City Survey; thence N 0°01’06” W 124.80 feet along the east line of the West High School lease parcel to the Salt Lake City School Board and to the point of beginning. Area 10,405 SQ. FT. or 0.240 Acres This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC LANDS – PL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS V1 1 Project Title: K-12 Public School Development Standards in the PL District Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00320 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 29, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Not Recommended 7/9/2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only):  Amends Title 21A to permanently incorporate the K-12 development standards adopted earlier this year through a temporary land use regulation.  Amends the development standards for K-12 public schools in the PL district to facilitate the construction of new high schools.  Exempts K-12 Public uses and their accessory uses from the standards in the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change.   1 1. Amending Section 21A.32.070 as follows: 2 3 21A.32.070: PL PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT 4 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the PL Public Lands District is to specifically delineate areas 5 of public use and to control the potential redevelopment of public uses, lands and facilities. This district is 6 appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable master plans support this type of land use. 7 B. Uses: Uses in the PL Public Lands District, as specified in sSection 21A.33.070, "Table Of 8 Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the 9 general provisions set forth in sSection 21A.32.010 of this chapter and this section. 10 C. Minimum Lot Area Aand Lot Width: 11 12 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Public schools 5 acres 150 feet Other permitted uses 20,000 square feet 75 feet 13 D. Maximum Building Height: 14 1. Local government facilities, prison or jail, government offices, arenas, stadiums, fairgrounds and 15 exhibition halls: Seventy five feet (75') 75 feet; provided, that where abutting a zoning district 16 allowing greater height, the height standard of the abutting district shall apply. 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 29, 2025 V1 2 2. Schools, K-12 Public: 125 feet 18 3. Other uses: 35 Thirty-five feet (35'). 19 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 20 1. Public School Schools, K-12 Public: when a site for a public school includes multiple parcels or 21 lots, setbacks shall apply to the perimeter of the site and to property lines shared between the school 22 district and a different property owner. 23 a. Front Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 24 b. Corner Side Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 25 c. Interior Side Yard: 26 i. Buildings next to a residential or manufacturing zoning district: Fifty 50 feet (50'). 27 ii. Buildings next to any other zoning district: 30 feet 28 d. Rear Yard: One hundred feet (100'). 29 i. Buildings next to a residential or manufacturing zoning district: Fifty 50 feet (50'). 30 ii. Buildings next to any other zoning district: 30 feet 31 2. Other Uses: 32 a. Front Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 33 b. Corner Side Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 34 c. Interior Side Yard: Twenty 20 feet (20'). 35 d. Rear Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 36 3. Accessory Buildings Aand Structures Iin Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be 37 located in required yard areas subject to sSection 21A.36.020, tTable 21A.36.020B of this title. 38 F.Required Landscape Yards: All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscaped yards in 39 conformance with the requirements of cChapter 21A.48 of this title. 40 G. Landscape Buffers: When a lot in the PL Public Lands District abuts a lot in a Ssingle-Ffamily or 41 Ttwo-Ffamily Rresidential Ddistrict, landscape buffers, in accordance with the requirements of 42 cChapter 21A.48 of this title, shall be required. 43 H. Modifications for Schools, K-12 Public: In accordance with Utah Code 10-9a-305 the planning 44 director may modify a regulation set forth in this zoning district or that applies to the zoning district 45 when located elsewhere in this title, if the modification does not negatively impact the health or safety 46 of the general public or occupants of a K-12 Public School. The planning director may consult other 47 city departments when determining if a modification negatively impacts the health or safety of the 48 general public or building occupants. 49 50 2. Amending Subsection 21A.34.020.B as follows: 51 V1 3 52 B. Applicability: All properties located within the boundaries of a local historic, part of a thematic 53 designation, or designated as a landmark site are subject to the requirements of this chapter. 54 1. Applicable Standards: The applicable standards of this chapter are determined by the historic status 55 rating of the property, either contributing or noncontributing, as identified in the most recent historic 56 resource survey on file with the Salt Lake City Planning Division or a historic status determination 57 issued in accordance with Subsection 21A.34.020.D. 58 2. Exceptions: School, K-12 Public uses and their accessory uses are exempt from any provisions in 59 Section 21A.34.020 Historic Preservation Overlay District 60 61 3. Amending Subsection 21A.36.020.B as follows: 62 63 B. Obstructions In Required Yards: Accessory uses and structures, and projections of the principal 64 structure, may be located in a required yard only as indicated ("X") in table 21A.36.020B of this 65 section. No portion of an obstruction authorized in table 21A.36.020B of this section shall extend 66 beyond the authorized projection. Dimensions shall be measured from the finished surface of the 67 building or structure. 68 69 [note to codifier: Table 21A.36.020B Obstructions in Required Yards, along with the Notes thereto, 70 remains in this portion of the subsection and is unaffected by this amendment – a new subsection 1 71 follows the tables and notes] 72 73 1. Allowed obstructions in required yards for Schools, K-12 Public: 74 a. All yards: 75 (1) Parking stalls, vehicle drive aisles, and circulation elements necessary for the safe and 76 efficient movement of people, bicycles, and vehicles. Curb cut locations, width, spacing and 77 total number of curb cuts shall be determined by the Transportation Director on streets with 78 city jurisdiction and the Utah Department of Transportation on streets under state jurisdiction. 79 (2) Playground equipment and structures are allowed in any required yard. 80 (3) Athletic fields and courts, including necessary accessory buildings to support the athletic 81 facility. Bleachers over 20 feet in height shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet from a 82 property line that is shared with a residential land use. 83 b. Any other obstruction allowed in 21A.36.020 Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls. 84 85 4. Effective Date. If adopted this text amendment will become effective on the date of its first publication. 86 This page has intentionally been left blank Item C4 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE:MOTION SHEET – Zoning Map Amendment / Development Agreement for the Delta Center Parking Garage at Approximately 301 West South Temple MOTION 1 I move the Council adopt an ordinance adopting the development agreement. MOTION 2 I move the Council reject the ordinance. MOTION 3 I move the Council postpone action to a future Council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE: September 9, 2025 RE:Development Agreement for the Delta Center Parking Garage PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: September 2, 2025 Set Date: August 19, 2025 Public Hearing: Sept 2, 2025 Potential Action: Sept 9, 2025 NEW INFORMATION During the September 2 work session briefing the Council discussed the five conditions forwarded by the Planning Commission for the Council to consider. During that discussion, the Council expressed support for providing more specificity to the conditions 1, 3 and 5 forwarded by the Planning Commission. 1. Additional visual interest be incorporated along the retaining walls at the base of the structure’s street facing facades and identified in the plan set prior to adoption of the development agreement. 3. The applicant includes substantial bicycle parking on the property in close proximity to the primary entrances of the arena as determined by staff. 5. The applicant works with staff to create a larger landscape buffer as possible. Additionally, questions were also raised about how to ensure the conditions are legally met. Based on that discussion, Smith Entertianment Group (SEG) representatives and City staff included the following concepts for the Council to consider adding to the final development agreement. 1.Bicycle parking - SEG will build three bike racks on the block, with a capacity of 15 at each location. 2.Landscaping - SEG will design and plant Lanscaping such as trees shrub/bushes along 100 south and 400 west pursuant to the exhibit B of the development agreement. 3.Visual activation of the 100 S/400 W - SEG would provide up to $50,000 in funds to be used to visually activate the 400 W/100 S by way of public art or other similar features, in Page | 2 consultation with the City Arts Council and Planning Department. The funding for the art will not come from the Public Benefit Ticket Fee as agreed to in the participation agreement. 4.Ensuring compliance with the development agreement - Failure to comply with the development agreement would result in daily fines. The Council is tentatively scheduled to consider taking action on September 9. The following information was provided for the September 2 work session briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would approve a Development Agreement for the construction of the Delta Center parking garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. The proposal includes the construction of a seven-story (~95 feet) parking garage with approximately 450 parking stalls at the southwest corner of the site, which is intended to provide parking for patrons of the Delta Center Arena and improve the site's functionality. The applicant is requesting approval of the development agreement associated with the project, which establishes specific rules for constructing the parking garage at the Delta Center Arena. If approved, the proposed development agreement could supersede several of the City's rules and regulations. The public hearing has been set for September 2, 2025. The work session briefing and public hearing will both be held that day. The location has long been used as loading/receiving dock and parking access for the building. The proposed parking garage will include a below-grade loading dock for larger vehicles and secured access for authorized personnel. Access into the garage will be from both 100 South and 400 west. The Planning Commission voted 5:2 to forward a recommendation of approval with the conditions 1-4 as listed below, with a modification to condition 3 and the addition of condition 5. 1. Additional visual interest be incorporated along the retaining walls at the base of the structure’s street facing facades and identified in the plan set prior to adoption of the development agreement. 2. The applicant replaces the proposed woven wire mesh screening material on the street facing facades of the loading area with screening materials similar to or consistent with the perforated aluminum panels proposed for the upper levels of the structure prior to adoption of the development agreement. 3. The applicant includes substantial bicycle parking on the property in close proximity to the primary entrances of the arena as determined by staff. 4. Final details regarding site plan requirements be provided in the plan set prior to adoption of the Development Agreement. 5. The applicant works with staff to create a larger landscape buffer as possible. Smith Entertainment Group provided responses to the Planning Commission’s recommendations. They can be found in Attachment B – Applicant Response to Planning Commission Recommendations POLICY QUESTIONS The Council may wish to discuss with planning staff and the applicant how the recommendations from the Planning Commission outlined above would be incorporated into the development. Some questions have been raised about activating the street level portion of the block where the parking garage will be located, the southwest corner. Page | 4 o The Council may wish to ask Planning staff how the parking garage fits into the overall development of the block and how if there are ways to improve the pedestrian experience in this corner of the block. Some Council Members have raised the question about encouraging other modes of transportation when people attend events at the Delta Cetner block, including bicycling. One of the Planning Commission’s recommendations included “substantial bicycle parking on the property” o The Council may wish to ask the planning staff and the applicant how they intend to incorporate this recommendation into the development of the block. i MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE JAZZ ARENA PARKING GARAGE ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits/ Definitions ........................................................................................ 2 1.1 Incorporation .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................. 2 2 Effect of MDA ................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 Development of the Project ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Compliance with this MDA ................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Approved Plans ...................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Zoning and Vested Rights ................................................................................................................................ 4 4 Zoning and Vested Rights ................................................................................................................................ 4 5 Term of Agreement ......................................................................................................................................... 5 6 Default ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 6.1 Notice ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 6.2 Contents of the Notice of Default .......................................................................................................... 5 6.3 Remedies................................................................................................................................................ 5 6.4 Extended Cure Period ............................................................................................................................ 5 7 Dispute Resolution .......................................................................................................................................... 5 7.1 Meet and Confer regarding Disputes ..................................................................................................... 5 7.2 Mediation of Disputes ............................................................................................................................ 5 8 Notices............................................................................................................................................................. 6 8.1 Effectiveness of Notice ......................................................................................................................... 6 9 Administrative Modifications .......................................................................................................................... 7 9.1 Allowable Administrative Applications ................................................................................................ 7 9.2 Application to Administrator ................................................................................................................. 7 9.3 Administrator’s Review of Administrative Modification ...................................................................... 7 9.4 Appeal of Administrator’s Denial of Administrative Modification ....................................................... 7 10 Estoppel Certificate .................................................................................................................................... 7 10 Estoppel Certificate .................................................................................................................................... 7 11 Attorney’s Fees .......................................................................................................................................... 7 12 Headings ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 13 No Third-Party Rights/No Joint Venture ................................................................................................... 7 14 Assignability .............................................................................................................................................. 7 14.1 Assignees Bound by MDA .................................................................................................................... 8 14.2 Recorded Notice .................................................................................................................................... 8 15 No Waiver .................................................................................................................................................. 8 iii 16 Further Documentation .............................................................................................................................. 8 17 Severability ................................................................................................................................................ 8 18 Force Majeure ............................................................................................................................................ 8 19 Time is of the Essence .......................................................................................................................... 8 20 Appointment of Representatives ................................................................................................................ 8 21 Rights of Access ......................................................................................................................................... 8 22 Mutual Drafting .......................................................................................................................................... 8 23 Applicable Law .......................................................................................................................................... 8 24 Venue ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 25 Entire Agreement ....................................................................................................................................... 9 26 Recordation and Running with the Land.................................................................................................... 9 27 Authority .................................................................................................................................................... 9 28 Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing ................................................................................................. 9 29 REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES .............................................................. 9 30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT ACT .................................................... 9 1 MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE JAZZ ARENA PARKING GARAGE This MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement” or “MDA”) is made and entered as of the 9th day of September, 2025, by and between Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah (“City”); the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City formerly known as the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (“CRA”); and the Jazz Arena Investors LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“Master Developer”). RECITALS A. The capitalized terms used in these Recitals are defined above and in Section 1.2, below. B. Master Developer is developing the Property, which is owned by CRA. C. Development of the Property will include the Parking Garage and Façade as defined in this MDA. D. Development of the Project pursuant to this MDA is acknowledged by the Parties to be consistent with LUDMA and to operate for the benefit of the City, the Master Developer, the CRA, and the general public. E. The Parties acknowledge that development of the Property pursuant to this MDA will result in orderly development of the Parking Garage, Façade and related improvements and increasing property tax and other revenues to the City based on improvements to be constructed on the Property. F. Development of the Property pursuant to this MDA will also result in significant benefits to the Master Developer, by providing assurances to the Master Developer that it will have the ability to develop the Parking Garage and Façade in accordance with this MDA. G. The Master Developer and the City have cooperated in the preparation of this MDA. H. The Parties desire to enter into this MDA to specify the rights and responsibilities of the Master Developer to develop the Project as expressed in this MDA and the rights and responsibilities of the City to allow and regulate such development pursuant to the requirements of this MDA. I. The Parties understand and intend that this MDA is a “development agreement” within the meaning of, and entered into pursuant to the terms of, Utah Code §§ 10-9a-102(18) and -532 (2025). J. This MDA was considered by the Planning Commission and recommended for approval on August 13, 2025. K. On September 2, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing and, on September 9, 2025, approved this Agreement by the adoption of Ordinance # ______. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby conclusively acknowledged, the City and the Master Developer hereby agree to the following: 2 TERMS 1. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits/ Definitions. 1.1. Incorporation. The foregoing Recitals and Exhibits “A” – “B” are hereby incorporated into this MDA. 1.2. Definitions. As used in this MDA, the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein where capitalized in this MDA. Words not defined herein shall have the same meaning as provided by Title 21A of Salt Lake City Code. When consistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural number include the singular number, words in the singular number include the plural number, and the use of any gender shall apply to all genders whenever the context requires. The words “shall” and “will” are mandatory and the word “may” is permissive. References to governmental entities (whether persons or entities) refer to those entities or their successors in authority. If specific provisions of law referred to herein are renumbered, then the reference shall be read to refer to the renumbered provision. 1.2.1. Administrative Modifications means those modifications to this MDA that can be approved by the Administrator pursuant to Section 11. 1.2.2. Administrator means the Planning Director. 1.2.3. Applicant means a person or entity submitting a Development Application. 1.2.4. Buildout means the completion of all of the Parking Garage and Façade in accordance with the approved plans. 1.2.5. Canopy means a canopy over portions of the upper level of the Parking Garage to protect cars and guests from inclement weather as more fully specified in the Plans, Exhibit “B”. 1.2.6. City means Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Utah. 1.2.7. City’s Vested Laws means the Zoning Ordinance of Salt Lake City, Title 21A, in effect at the time that the complete Development Application was submitted. 1.2.8. Council means the elected City Council of the City. 1.2.9. Default means a material breach of this MDA. 1.2.10. Development means the development of the Project pursuant to an approved Development Application. 1.2.11. Development Application means the application for this MDA which is referenced in the City’s Planning system as PLNPCM2025-00619. 1.2.12. Dispute means any disagreement between the Parties regarding the administration or implementation of the MDA, including but not limited to a Default. 1.2.13. Dispute Resolution Process means the non-exclusive processes for resolving any Dispute as specified in Section 9. 1.2.14. Façade means the façade for the Parking Garage, subset of the whole Project, 3 as illustrated and generally specified in Exhibit B. 1.2.15. LUDMA means the Land Use, Development, and Management Act, Utah Code §§ 10-9a-101, et seq. (2025). 1.2.16. Notice means any notice to or from any Party to this MDA that is either required or permitted to be given to another party. 1.2.17. Master Developer means Jazz Arena Investors LLC. 1.2.18. MDA means this Master Development Agreement including all of its Exhibits. 1.2.19. Parking Garage means the Parking Garage, a subset of the whole Project, as illustrated and generally specified in Exhibit B. 1.2.20. Parties means the Master Developer, CRA and the City. 1.2.21. Party means the Master Developer, CRA or the City individually. 1.2.22. Plans means the size, design, location and materials of the Project as illustrated on Exhibit “B”. 1.2.23. Project means the complete and full development of the Parking Garage, Canopy, and the Façade, as well as the bicycle parking, landscaping, and visual activation elements as discussed in Subsections 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 of this Agreement. 1.2.24. Property means the approximately nine and eighteen hundredths (9.18) acres as illustrated on Exhibit “B” and legally described in Exhibit “A”, where the Project is located. 2. Effect of MDA. This MDA is of limited scope and applicable only to the Project. This MDA does not satisfy the obligation of Master Developer’s affiliates, SEG Real Estate LLC and Smith Entertainment Group, LLC, pursuant to that certain Participation, Tax Sharing, and Reimbursement Agreement dated December 10, 2024 (the “Participation Agreement”), to enter into a “Development Agreement” as defined in the Participation Agreement. 3. Development of the Project. 3.1. Compliance with this MDA. Development of the Project shall be in accordance with the City’s Vested Laws as modified by this MDA. 3.2. Approved Plans. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the City’s Vested Laws, Master Developer is entitled to construct the Project in strict accordance with the Plans, subject to any approved Administrative Modifications as provided in Section 8. This MDA approves the Plans for purposes of the City’s Vested Laws, but no other regulations, including building code, fire code, and public utilities. The Project shall obtain all required permits and shall be subject to the City’s standard plan review process. 3.3. Bicycle Parking. Master Developer shall provide and install a bicycle rack at each of the following Property corners as generally illustrated on Exhibit B, and prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: the northwest corner, the northeast corner, and the southeast corner. The exact locations of said bicycle racks is to be determined in consultation with the City’s Planning and Transportation engineering staff. Each bicycle rack shall provide space for at least 15 bicycles whereby the bicycle frame, not the tires, may be locked to the rack. 4 3.4. Landscaping of 100 South and 400 West. Master Developer shall provide enhanced landscaping along 100 South and 400 West as shown on Exhibit “B”. 3.5. Visual Activation of 100 South and 400 West. Master Developer shall provide a minimum of at least $75,000 in funds to be used to “visually activate” the 400 West and 100 South frontages by way of public art or other similar features to be designed in consultation with the City Planning Department and the City Art Council. The minimum amount of at least $75,000 shall not be funded through the Public Benefit Ticket Fee as agreed to in Subsection 3.3(a) of the Participation, Tax Sharing & Reimbursement Agreement between the City, SEG Real Estate LLC and Smith Entertainment Group (recorded by the Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office on December 10, 2024). 3.6. Completion. Master Developer agrees to comply with and complete installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5 no later than December 31, 2031, or upon completion of the improvements to the Delta Center Arena (“Arena”) contemplated by the Participation Agreement, provided a building permit for exterior renovation to the Arena has been issued by December 31, 2029. If Master Developer determines it cannot complete installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5 by December 31, 2031, Master Developer may request an extension from the City. 3.6.1. Extensions and Liquidated Damages. The City may determineif an extension of time for completion is warranted. This Agreement does not, nor does any other verbal or written agreement with Master Developer, give Master Developer a right to an extension for completion of the installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5. If it is determined an extension of time for completion is warranted, the City may grant an extension of time in accordance with Subsections 3.6.2 through 3.6.4. 3.6.2. Extension 1: Beginning January 1, 2032 and ending on or before June 31, 2032. Master Developer agrees to pay the City $100 per day until the date of completion (of installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5), or June 31, 2032, whichever occurs first. 3.6.3. Extension 2: Beginning July 1, 2032 and ending on or before December 31, 2032. Master Developer agrees to pay the City $200 per day until the date of completion (of installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5), or December 31, 2032, whichever occurs first. 3.6.4. Extension 3: Beginning January 1, 2033 and ending on or before December 31, 2033, Master Developer agrees to pay the City $400 per day until the date of completion (of installation of the items and improvements in Subsections 3.3 through 3.5), or December 31, 2033, whichever occurs first. 4. Non-compliance. Failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement will result in the City’s pursuit of any and all remedies provided by law and those in Subsections 3.6.1 through 3.6.4. and Section 7 of the Agreement. 5. Maintenance Obligations. The Project, the Property, and the improvements installed pursuant to Subsections 3.3 through 3.5 (together referred to as “the improvements”) shall all be maintained by Master Developer, or its successor, in perpetuity. This maintenance obligation shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement, upon installation of the improvements. 6. Zoning and Vested Rights. This MDA does not grant the Master Developer or any Applicant any “vested rights” in Utah common law or Utah Code 10-9a-509. Rather, the Project shall comply with all 5 applicable laws and regulations in Salt Lake City Code. Only to the extent the Plans do not comply with the City’s Vested Laws is a waiver hereby given to such regulations. 7. Term of Agreement. The term of this MDA shall be until December 31, 2031 (unless extended in accordance with Subsections 3.6.1 through 3.6.4 above), or upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project, whichever occurs first. 8. Default. 8.1. Notice. If the Master Developer or the City fails to perform their respective obligations hereunder or to comply with the terms hereof, the Party believing that a Default has occurred shall provide Notice to the other Party. 8.2. Contents of the Notice of Default. The Notice of Default shall: 8.2.1. Specific Claim. Specify the claimed event of Default; 8.2.2. Applicable Provisions. Identify with particularity the provisions of any applicable law, rule, regulation, or provision of this MDA that is claimed to be in Default; 8.2.3. Cure Deadline. The City shall specify a time for Master Developer or Applicant to cure the Default which shall be of no less than thirty (30) days duration, except in case of emergency. 8.2.4. Appeal Process. The City shall specify the process to appeal the Notice of Default in accordance with Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.16 or its successor. 8.3. Remedies. If the Parties are not able to resolve a Default, then the Parties may have the following remedies: 8.3.1. Law and Equity. All rights and remedies available in law and equity including, but not limited to, injunctive relief and/or specific performance. 8.3.2. Security. The right to draw on any security posted or provided in connection with the Project and relating to remedying of the particular Default. 8.3.3. Zoning Enforcement. The City shall have the remedies set forth in Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.20, or its successor. 8.4. Extended Cure Period. Except in case of an emergency, if any Default cannot be reasonably cured within thirty (30) days, then such cure period shall be extended so long as the defaulting Party is pursuing a cure with reasonable diligence, but in no event may exceed one hundred and eighty (180) days. The burden of proof of reasonable diligence shall be on the defaulting Party. 9. Dispute Resolution. Any Dispute arising from this Agreement, including from Subsections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5, may be resolved as follows: 9.1. Meet and Confer regarding Disputes. The City and Applicant shall meet within fifteen (15) business days of any Dispute to resolve the issues specified in the Dispute. 9.2. Mediation of Disputes. 9.2.1. Optional Mediation Process. If the City and the Applicant are unable to resolve a Dispute the parties may attempt within ten (10) business days after 6 a written request for mediation to appoint a mutually acceptable mediator. The Parties shall equally share the cost of mediation. The chosen mediator shall within fifteen (15) business days, review the positions of the Parties regarding the Dispute and promptly attempt to mediate the Dispute between the Parties. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement, the mediator shall notify the Parties in writing of the resolution that the mediator deems appropriate. The mediator's opinion shall not be binding on the Parties. 10. Notices. All notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall, in addition to other means of transmission, be given in writing by certified mail and regular mail to the following address: To Master Developer: Jazz Arena Investors LLC Attn: Mr. Jim Olson 1420 South 500 West Salt Lake City, UT 84115 With a Copy to: General Counsel 1420 South 500 West Salt Lake City, UT 84115 legal@teamseg.com With a Copy to: Bruce R. Baird, Esq. Bruce R. Baird PLLC 2150 South 1300 East, Fifth Floor Salt Lake City, UT 84106 bbaird@difficultdirt.com To City: Salt Lake City Attn: Planning Director 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 With a Copy to: Salt Lake City Attorney 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, UT 84111 10.1. Effectiveness of Notice. Except as otherwise provided in this MDA, each Notice shall be effective and shall be deemed delivered on the earlier of: 10.1.1. Hand Delivery. The day it is delivered personally or by courier service. 10.1.2. Electronic Delivery. Its actual receipt if delivered electronically by email provided that a copy of the email is printed out in physical form and mailed or personally delivered as set forth herein on the same day and the sending party has an electronic receipt of the delivery of the Notice. If the copy is not sent on the same day, then notice shall be deemed effective the date that the mailing or personal delivery occurs. 10.1.3. Mailing. On the day the Notice is postmarked for mailing, postage prepaid, by First Class or Certified United States Mail and actually deposited in or delivered to the United States Mail. Any Party may change its address for 7 Notice under this MDA by giving written Notice to the other Party in accordance with the provisions of this Section. 11. Administrative Modifications. 11.1. Allowable Administrative Applications: Only minor modifications of the Plans (and no terms of this Agreement) may be considered and approved by the Administrator. Such minor modifications include minor changes to the size set forth in the Plans. Minor size changes are dimensional changes of elements of the Project that are no greater than 10%. Changes to the overall design or location shall not be minor. The Administrator shall have the sole, unappealable, discretion to decide if a request by Master Developer constitutes a minor modification subject to this section. If the Administrator determines that a request is not a minor modification, then such request shall be processed as an amendment to this Agreement requiring review by both the Salt Lake City Planning Commission and City Council. 11.1.1. Materials Specifications. Exhibit “B” specifies the materials that will be used for the Project. Any modifications or changes to the materials specified in Exhibit B is not a minor modification, therefore, is not an Administrative Modification. 11.2. Application to Administrator. Applications for Administrative Modifications may only be requested by the Master Developer and shall be filed with the Administrator. Any and all applications for Administrative Modifications must comply with the requirements in Salt Lake City Code 21A.59.030. 11.3. Administrator’s Review of Administrative Modification. The Administrator shall consider and decide upon the Administrative Modification within a reasonable time not to exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of submission of a complete application for an Administrative Modification. If the Administrator approves the Administrative Modification, the Administrator shall memorialize such approval against the applicable portion of the Property in the official City records. 11.4. Appeal of Administrator’s Denial of Administrative Modification. If the Administrator denies any proposed Administrative Modification, the Master Developer may seek approval of such modification as an amendment to this Agreement, which shall require review by both the Salt Lake City Planning Commission and City Council. 12. Estoppel Certificate. If the Master Developer is not, in fact, in default then, upon twenty (20) days prior written request by the Master Developer, the City will execute an estoppel certificate to any third party certifying that the Master Developer, as the case may be, at that time is not in default of the terms of this Agreement. 13. Attorney’s Fees. Each Party is solely responsible for its own costs of any legal fees and costs, including attorneys fees related to or resulting from this Agreement, with the exception of any shared mediation costs per Section 9 of this Agreement. 14. Headings. The captions used in this MDA are for convenience only and are not intended to be substantive provisions or evidence of intent. 15. No Third-Party Rights/No Joint Venture. This MDA does not create a joint venture relationship, partnership or agency relationship between the City and the Master Developer. Further, the Parties do not intend this MDA to create any third-party beneficiary rights. 16. Assignability. The rights and responsibilities of the Master Developer under this MDA may be assigned in whole or in part by the Master Developer with the written consent of the City as provided herein. 8 16.1. Assignees Bound by MDA. Any assignee shall consent in writing to be bound by the assigned terms and conditions of this MDA as a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the assignment. 16.2. Recorded Notice. An instrument shall be recorded specifying the material details of any assignment approved in accordance with this Section. The recorded instrument shall be signed by the Master Developer and the assignee. The City shall also sign acknowledging that it has notice of the assignment and that the recorded instrument complies with this subsection. 17. No Waiver. No waiver of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless in writing and expressly designated as such. Any forbearance or delay on the part of either Party in enforcing any of its rights as set forth in this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of such right for such occurrence or any other occurrence. Any waiver by either party of any breach of any kind or character whatsoever by the other shall not be construed as a continuing waiver of, or consent to any subsequent breach of this Agreement. 18. Further Documentation. This MDA is entered into by the Parties with the recognition and anticipation that subsequent agreements implementing and carrying out the provisions of this MDA may be necessary. The Parties shall negotiate in good faith with respect to all such future agreements. 19. Severability. If any provision of this MDA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, the Parties consider and intend that this MDA shall be deemed amended to the extent necessary to make it consistent with such decision and the balance of this MDA shall remain in full force and affect. 20. Force Majeure. Any prevention, delay or stoppage of the performance of any obligation under this Agreement which is due to strikes, labor disputes, inability to obtain labor, materials, equipment or reasonable substitutes therefor; acts of nature, governmental restrictions, regulations or controls, judicial orders, enemy or hostile government actions, wars, civil commotions, fires or other casualties or other causes beyond the reasonable control of the Party obligated to perform hereunder shall excuse performance of the obligation by that Party for a period equal to the duration of that prevention, delay or stoppage. 21. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence to this MDA, and every right or responsibility shall be performed within the times specified. 22. Appointment of Representatives. To further the commitment of the Parties to cooperate in the implementation of this MDA, the City and the Master Developer each shall designate and appoint a representative to act as a liaison between the City and its various departments and the Master Developer. The initial representative for the City shall be the Planning Division Director. The initial representative for the Master Developer shall be Jim Olson. The Parties may change their designated representatives by Notice. The representatives shall be available at all reasonable times to discuss and review the performance of the Parties to this MDA and the development of the Project. 23. Rights of Access. The City Engineer and other representatives of the City shall have a reasonable right of access to the Property, and all areas of development or construction done pursuant to this MDA during development and construction, to inspect or observe the work on the improvements and to make such inspections and tests as are allowed or required under the City regulations. 24. Mutual Drafting. Each Party has participated in negotiating and drafting this MDA and therefore no provision of this MDA shall be construed for or against either party based on which Party drafted any particular portion of this MDA. 25. Applicable Law. This MDA is entered into in Salt Lake City in the State of Utah and shall be 9 construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah irrespective of Utah’s choice of law rules. 26. Venue. Any action to enforce this MDA shall be brought only in the Third District Court for the State of Utah, Salt Lake City. 27. Entire Agreement. This MDA, and all Exhibits thereto, is the entire agreement between the Parties and may not be amended or modified except either as provided herein or by a subsequent written amendment signed by all Parties. 28. Recordation and Running with the Land. This MDA shall be recorded in the chain of title for the Property. This MDA shall be deemed to run with the land. 29. Authority. The Parties to this MDA each warrant that they have all of the necessary authority to execute this MDA. Specifically, on behalf of the City, the signature of the Mayor is affixed to this MDA lawfully binding the City pursuant to Ordinance No. ___ adopted by the City Council on September 9, 2025. 30. Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. Each Party shall use its best efforts and take and employ all necessary actions in good faith consistent with this Agreement to ensure that the rights secured by the other Party through this Agreement can be enjoyed. 31. REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES AND FORMER CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. Master Developer represents that it has not: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity; (2) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of securing business; (3) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code; or (4) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City officer or employee or former City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth in City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code. 32. GOVERNMENT RECORDS ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT ACT. City is subject to the requirements of the Government Records Access and Management Act, Chapter 2, Title 63G, Utah Code Annotated or its successor (“GRAMA”). All materials submitted by Master Developer pursuant to this Agreement are subject to disclosure unless such materials are exempt from disclosure pursuant to GRAMA. The burden of claiming an exemption from disclosure shall rest solely with Master Developer. Any materials for which Master Developer claims a privilege from disclosure shall be submitted marked as “Business Confidential” and accompanied by a concise statement of reasons supporting Master Developer’s claim of business confidentiality. City will make reasonable efforts to notify Master Developer of any requests made for disclosure of documents submitted under a claim of business confidentiality. Master Developer may, at Master Developer’s sole expense, take any appropriate actions to prevent disclosure of such material. Master Developer specifically waives any claims against City related to disclosure of any materials required by GRAMA. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement by and through their respective, duly authorized representatives as of _________________, 2025. 10 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit “A” Legal Description of The Property Exhibit “B” Plans [signatures on following pages] 11 CITY: ATTEST: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a political subdivision of the State of Utah By: _____________________________ By: _______________________________ Salt Lake City Recorder Mayor Erin Mendenhall Approved as to form: ________________________________ City Attorney’s Office Date:____________________________ STATE OF UTAH ) :ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) This instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ______________, 2025, by Erin Mendenhall, Mayor of Salt Lake City Corporation, a political subdivision of the State of Utah. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ___________________________ Notary Public [CRA SIGNATURE BLOCK TO BE ADDED] 12 MASTER DEVELOPER JAZZ ARENA INVESTORS LLC A Utah limited liability company , Manager MASTER DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF UTAH ) :ss COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) On the ____ day of __________, 2025, personally appeared before me duly sworn, did say that he is the Manager of JAZZ ARENA INVESTORS LLC, a Utah limited liability company, and that the foregoing instrument was duly authorized by the company at a lawful meeting held by authority of its operating agreement and signed in behalf of said company. NOTARY PUBLIC i EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ii BEG AT THE NE COR OF BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR; S 0°13'31" W 660.36 FT; N 89°46'55" W 660.70 FT; N 0°14'38" E 390.25 FT; N 45°16'17" E 382.34 FT; S 89°46'56" E 390.01 FT TO BEG. (BEING PT OF LOTS 4 & 5 & ALL OF LOTS 1 THRU 3 & 6 THU 8, BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR). 9.176 AC M OR L. 5918-838 6175-1443 6227-1454,1482 iii EXHIBIT B PLANS [Approved Plans to be inserted here] PROJECT TEAMWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.ARCHITECT / PARKINGWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEVBFAMECHANICAL & PLUMBING ENGINEERBNA ConsultingELECTRICAL ENGINEERCONSTRUCTION MANAGERIN ASSOCIATION WITH Hales EngineeringTRAFFIC ENGINEEROWNER301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-20007/16/2025 1:09:59 PM DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTUREProject #: M092400600Date: 07/15/202561 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 8410161 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 PHONE # 310.254.1900999 18TH STREET, SUITE 1715 N.DENVER, CO 80202 PHONE # 303.731.10034919 SOUTH 1500 WEST, SUITE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE # 801.792.7730181 E 5600 S #200MURRAY, UT 84123PHONE # 801.530.31484225 LAKE PARK BLVD. SUITE 275WEST VALLEY CITY, UT 84120 PHONE # 801.532.21961220 N. 500 W, SUITE 202LEHI, UT 84043PHONE # 801.766.4343--1 R A M P DETAIL KEY SHEET # DETAIL # ELEVATION KEY SHEET # ELEVATION # WALL SECTION KEY DETAIL # SHEET # BUILDING SECTION KEY DETAIL # SHEET # NORTH ARROW TRUE NORTH REVISION CLOUD GRID DESIGNATION TAG KEY # # X X 100 Name 100 #'-#" WALL TAG (PARTITION TYPE) KEYED NOTE ACCESSORY TAG FINISH TAG SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT TAG DOOR TAG ROOM TAG CEILING HEIGHT TAG 1 A1.01 SIM ## ### SIM SPOT ELEVATION 100.0 0 REFERENCE OBJECT U2A* A101 1 Ref 1 Ref 1Ref 1 Ref LEVEL KEY PRECAST PANEL TAG INTERIOR ELEVATION TAG 11A3-0 Elevation Level ## ### SIM ## ### SIM N REFERENCE TRUE NORTH REFERENCE NORTH TOP OF STRUCTURAL SLAB ELEVATION 100.1 7 TOP OF STRUCTURAL SLAB ELEVATION 100.0 0 TOP OF FINISHED ELEVATION MATERIAL LEGEND EARTH GRAVEL / BALLAST STEEL CONCRETE RIGID INSUL. BATT INSUL. FIRE SAFING MARBLE / GRANITE FINISH LUMBER PLYWOOD WOOD BLOCKING SHIM CUT STONE / PRE-CAST CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BRICK ALUMINUM PLASTER GYPSUM BOARD GLAZING UNDISTURBED EARTH METAL STUD VICINITY MAP EXPANDED VIEW N REFERENCE TRUE NORTH ABBREVIATIONS APPLICABLE CODE LIST WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS LOCATION MAP NREFERENCE TRUE NORTH DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF WORK H HIGH HB HOSE BIB HC HOLLOW CORE HDCP HANDICAP HD HEAD HDW HARDWARE HM HOLLOW METAL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HP HIGH POINT HGT HEIGHT HTR HEATER HWH HOT WATER HEATER HVAC HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING ICE ICE MACHINE ID INSIDE DIAMETER IN INCH INCL INCLUDE (ED) (ING) INFO INFORMATION INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR JAN JANITOR JB JUNCTION BOX JST JOIST JT JOINT L LENGTH LAB LABORATORY LAM LAMINATE LAV LAVATORY LB POUND LF LINEAR FEET LH LEFT HAND LKR LOCKER LP LOW POINT M METER MA MARBLE MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MB MARKER BOARD OR MOP BASIN MDF MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD MECH MECHANICAL MFR MANUFACTURER MH MANHOLE MIC MICROWAVE MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MM MILLIMETER MO MASONRY OPENING MTD MOUNTED MTL METAL N NORTH NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL NTS NOT TO SCALE OA OVERALL OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OH OVERHEAD OHD OVERHEAD DOOR OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE ORD OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN OPT OPTIONAL ORIG ORIGINAL OZ OUNCE PARTN PARTITION PC PRECAST PERF PERFORATED PJ PANEL JOINT PL PLATE PLAS PLASTER P LAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PLG PLUMBING PLYWD PLYWOOD PNL PANEL PR PAIR PREFAB PREFABRICATED PRELIM PRELIMINARY PROJ PROJECT PRS PROJECTION SCREEN PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PT PAINT PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER QT QUARRY TILE QTR QUARTER R RISER R/A RETURN AIR RAD RADIUS RB RESILIENT BASE RD ROOF DRAIN REF REFERENCE REINF REINFORCED (ING) RF RESILIENT FLOORING RFG REFRIGERATOR A/C AIR CONDITIONING ACT ACOUSTICAL CEILING TILE AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AHU AIR HANDLING UNIT ALUM ALUMINUM ALT ALTERNATE AMT AMOUNT AP ACCESS PANEL APPROX APPROXIMATE ARCH ARCHITECTURAL ATM AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE AV AUDIO VISUAL BD BOARD BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCKING BM BEAM OR BENCHMARK BMD BOTTOM OF METAL DECK BO BOTTOM OF BOS BOTTOM OF STAIRS BRG BEARING BSMT BASEMENT CAB(S) CABINET(S) CB CORNER BEAN CG CORNER GUARD CI CAST IRON CJ CONTROL JOINT CLG CEILING CL CLOSET CLR CLEAR CM CENTIMETER CMP COMPOSITE METAL PANEL CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CO CLEAN OUT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CONTR CONTRACTOR COPY COPY/PRINT MACHINE CPT CARPET CT CERAMIC TILE CTR CENTER CTSK COUNTERSINK CW CURTAIN WALL DBL DOUBLE DEG DEGREE DEPT DEPARTMENT DTL DETAIL DIA DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL DIM DIMENSION DN DOWN DR DOOR DS DOWNSPOUT DW DISHWASHER DWG(S) DRAWING(S) E EAST EA EACH EIFS EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEM EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATOR ENCL ENCLOSURE ENGR ENGINEER EQ EQUAL EQP EQUIPMENT ESMT EASEMENT EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXH EXHAUST EXIST EXISTING EXP EXPANSION EXT EXTERIOR FA FIRE ALARM FCU FAN COIL UNIT FD FLOOR DRAIN FDN FOUNDATION FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FF FINISH FLOOR FHC FIRE HOSE CABINET FIN FINISH FL FLOW LINE FLR FLOOR FT FEET FTG FOOTING FUT FUTURE FV FIELD VERIFY FWC FABRIC WALL COVERING GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GB GRAB BAR GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GEN GENERATOR GFB GROUND FACE BLOCK GFRC GLASS FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE GFRG GLASS FIBER REINFORCED GYPSUM GL GLASS GND GROUND GYP GYPSUM REQ REQUIRED RET RETAINING REV REVISION RH RIGHT HAND RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RTU ROOF TOP UNIT RV ROOF VENT S SOUTH S/A SUPPLY AIR SAB SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET SAN SANITARY SD SMOKE DETECTOR SF SQUARE FEET SHR SHOWER SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR SM SQUARE METER SNR SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE SPEC(S) SPECIFICATION(S) SPKR SPEAKER SQ SQUARE SS STAINLESS STEEL ST STREET STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUCT STRUCTURE SUSP SUSPENDED SYM SYMMETRICAL SYS SYSTEM T TREAD / TEMPERED T&G TONGUE & GROOVE TB TACKBOARD TBD TO BE DETERMINED TELE TELEPHONE TELECOM TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TEMP TEMPORARY TRZ TERRAZZO THK THICK THRU THROUGH TO TOP OF TPH TOILET PAPER HOLDER TSS TOP STRUCTURAL SLAB TSTL TOP OF STEEL TU TILT-UP TV TELEVISION TW TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL UH UNIT HEATER UNFIN UNFINISHED UL UNDERWRITER'S LABORATORY UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED V VENDING MACHINE VB VAPOR BARRIER VENT VENTILATION VERT VERTICAL VEST VESTIBULE VWC VINYL WALL COVERING W WEST W/WITH W/O WITHOUT WC WATER CLOSET WD WOOD WG WALL GUARD WP WATERPROOFING WPT WORKING POINT WSCT WAINSCOT WT WEIGHT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC XMFR TRANSFORMER PARKING & AREA SUMMARY PARKING SPACE LEGEND ADA = STANDARD ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE EVS = ELECTRIC VEHICLE SPACE (FUTURE EVCS) EVCS = ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION CAV = CLEAN AIR / VAN POOL / EV SPACE STD = STANDARD PARKING SPACE COMP = COMPACT PARKING SPACE GRAPHIC SYMBOLS MATERIAL PATTERN SYMBOLS REQUIRED PARKING REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING PROJECT SITE PROJECT SITE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ZONING / CONSTRUCTION TYPE / USE GROUP / FIRE PROTECTION 7A 6B 5B 4B 3B 2B 1B 7B 6A 5A 4A 3A 2A 1A 1C ENT/EXT RAMP LOADING LOADING LOADING LEGAL DESCRIPTION & PARCEL NUMBER Legal Description: BEG AT THE NE COR OF BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR; S 0¿13'31" W 660.36 FT; N 89¿46'55" W 660.70 FT; N 0¿14'38" E 390.25 FT; N 45¿16'17" E 382.34 FT; S 89¿46'56" E 390.01 FT TO BEG. (BEING PT OF LOTS 4 & 5 & ALL OF LOTS 1 THRU 3 & 6 THU 8, BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR). 9.176 AC M OR L. 5918-838 6175-1443 6227-1454,1482 Parcel Record 15011270172000 Owner REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY Address 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE ST Total Acreage 9.18 Tax Class Id 50B Property Type 953 Tax District 01C % Exempt 100 Exempt Type T Municipal Zone D-4 MLS Number 5 5 500 ft0 ft 5 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 7/ 2 5 / 2 0 2 5 6 : 0 8 : 5 4 P M GENERAL SHEET A0.01 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA/YC SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: SALT LAKE CITY, UT 2021 UTAH FIRE CODE (UFC) 2019 UTAH FIRE ALARM CODE 2019 UTAH SPRINKLER CODE 2019 NFPA 14 - STANDPIPES 2019 NFPA 13 - SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 2019 NFPA 72 - NATIONAL FIRE ALARM ICC A117.1-09 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, INCLUDING APPENDICES C AND J, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2020 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 2017 UTAH ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN 2025 SALT LAKE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE ZONE:D-4 USE:PARKING, COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION :BASEMENT LEVEL IS CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING FROM THE OPEN PARKING GARAGE LEVELS ABOVE PER UBC 510.3 GROUP S-2 ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE WITH GROUP S-2 OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IIB FIRE PROTECTION:FIRE STANDPIPE + SPRINKLER SYSTEM BUILDING FOOTPRINT SIZE:188'-10" X 122'-7" NUMBER OF TIERS PROVIDED: 9 TIERS / 7 STORIES BUILDING TIERS ALLOWED: 9 TIERS PER UBC 406.5.5 AREA AND HEIGHT INCREASES ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 600'-0" PER D-4 ZONE HEIGHT LIMITS PER UBC HEIGHT OF OPEN PARKING BUILDING MEASURED FROM GRADE PLANE TO HIGHEST FLOOR TIER 9 = 81'-1" = 8.96 TIERS ROUNDED UP TO 9 TIERS PER UBC SECTION 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE. BUILDING HEIGHT: PER SLC MUNICIPAL CODE 80'-7" (PER SECTION 12-1.18. BUILDING HEIGHT. “BUILDING HEIGHT” SHALL MEAN THE VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE AVERAGE LEVEL OF THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST POINT OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE COVERED BY THE BUILDING TO THE CEILING OF THE UPPERMOST STORY.) VENTILATION: NATURAL VENTILATION ON OPEN PARKING LEVELS. MECHANICAL VENTILATION ON BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA ALLOWED: TYPE IIB = 50,000 S.F. MAX. PER OPEN TIER AND 104,000 S.F. MAX. PER ENCLOSED STORY. ALLOWABLE AREA WITH TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION PER UBC 510.3 (1) OF THE BUILDING SUCH THAT THE SUM OF RATIONS FOR EACH SEPARATE OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT EQUAL 1. BASEMENT ENCLOSED PARKING BUILDING AREA RATIO: 31,255 SF AREA PROVIDED /104,000 ALLOWED MAX. 1 STORY MAX ABOVE GRADE PLAN EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PER TABLE 506.2 = 0.31 RATIO ABOVE GRADE OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE BUILDING AREA RATIO : 29,839 PROVIDED (LARGEST TIER 1 MEASURED FROM LOWEST POINT OF TIER TO 9'-6" ABOVE AS DEFINED BY 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE )/ 50,000 SF PER TABLE 406.5.4 = 0.59 RATIO SUM OF RATIOS OF BUILDING 0.31+0.59=0.90 RATIO WHICH IS LESS THAN 1 FLOOR AREA/PER LEVEL: 23,276 S.F. TYPICAL GRAND TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 209,227 S.F. OCCUPANT LOAD PER LEVEL: 117 PER LEVEL TYPICAL EXIT STAIRS REQUIRED: 2 EXIT STAIRS PROVIDED:2 STAIR WIDTH REQUIRED PER STAIR: 18" STAIR WIDTH PROVIDED PER STAIR: 54" TRAVEL DISTANCE: 400' MAX. TO STAIR PER UBC TABLE 1017.2 (FULLY SPRINKLERED WITHOUT VOICE ALARM SYSTEM) THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A NEW 9 TIER/ 7 LEVEL OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE ABOVE ONE-TIER/ ONE STORY ENCLOSED COMMERCIAL VEHICLE LOADING AND AN ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. SITE IMPROVEMENTS WITH A LIMITED EXTENSION FROM THE EXTERIOR PERIMETER OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE INCLUDE ON-SITE DRIVEWAY ACCESS, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, UTILITY LINES. THE PARKING FACILITY IS DESIGNED WITH STEEL COLUMNS AND BEAMS AND CONCRETE-FILLED METAL DECK ELEVATED FLOORS OF TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION. SERVING ALL SEVEN ABOVE GRADE LEVELS ARE TWO ELEVATORS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER, TWO OPEN STAIRS AT THE NORTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS. THE BASEMENT LEVEL IS SERVED BY A NEW E;EVATOR CONNECTING TO LEVEL 1, AND AN EXISTING STAIR WITHIN THE ARENA AND A NEW STAIR FROM BASEMENT FOR LEVEL 1. VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROVIDED AT LEVEL 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS PROVIDED AT ALL LEVELS. EXCEPT BASEMENT LEVEL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR ENGINEER SHALL PREPARE DETAIL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS FOR THE DEFERRED ITEMS LISTED BELOW. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF UTAH. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL BE STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE REGISTERED ENGINEER AND PRESENTED TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD (AOR) / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD (SEOR) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTING THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION (AHJ) FOR APPROVAL AND PERMIT. INSTALLATION OF DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL NOT BE STARTED UNTIL THEY ARE ACCEPTED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD (AOR) / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD (SEOR) AND APPROVED/ PERMITTED BY AHJ. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR REVIEW BY AOR/ SEOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, APPROVAL, PERMITTED BY AHJ. DEFERRED ITEMS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 2. AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 3. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (INCLUDING CCTV) 4. BARRIER CABLES 5. STEEL STAIRS & GUARDRAILS 6. ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS 7. BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES 8. PLUMBING LINES AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUPPORT, BRACING, ANCHORAGES AND PROTECTION 9. PREFABRICATED GUARDBOOTH 10. PARKING CONTROL EQUIPMENT 11. METAL STUD/ COLD-FORMED FRAMING 12. GENERATORS 13. PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRY PORTAL 14. METAL FABRICATIONS, RAILINGS, AND GRATINGS 15. PILE LOAD TEST FRAME NOTE: INSTALLATION OF ELEVATOR GUIDE RAILS AND BRACKETS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH: 1. ASME 17.1/ CSA B44, ASME 17.1/ CSA B44.7 2. FOR ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SEE SHT S0-10, PART XI SUBMITTAL, B2 TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING = NONE REQUIRED PROVIDED PARKING SPACES PARKING STRUCTURE (THIS PERMIT) = 448 SPACES GRAND TOTAL = 448 SPACES * Within the 10 total ADA spaces there are 8 standard ADA and 2 Van ADA Total 438 10 448 0 165,238 34,227 9,763 210,085 369 Total 40 1 41 0 16,119 0 0 16,119 393 7B 9 0 9 0 4,015 0 0 4,015 446 7A ***31 1 32 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 378 Level 7 Total 66 1 67 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 348 6B **34 0 34 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 329 6A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367 Level 6 Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 5B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 5A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367 Level 5 Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 4B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 4A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367 Level 4 Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 3B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 3A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367 Level 3 Total 65 1 66 0 23,276 0 0 24,134 353 2B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 2A 30 1 31 0 12,104 0 0 12,962 391 Level 2 Total 66 4 70 0 28,753 0 9,763 38,515 411 1C 7 0 7 4,544 4,544 649 1B 35 0 35 11,213 0 5,353 16,566 320 1A 24 4 28 12,996 0 4,410 17,406 464 Level 1 Level B1 0 0 0 0 0 34,227 34,227 0 Slab on Grade Elevated Slab Slab on Grade Elevated Slab Standard Spaces ADA Spaces*Parking Area Standard Total Parking Area (sqft) Non-Parking Area (sqft)Parking and Non-Parking Total Area Efficiency (Parking Area / Parking Spaces) PARKING SUMMARY DELTA CENTER GARAGE NO BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED SINCE THE PROJECT IS DEFINED AS A GARAGE AND AN ACCESSORY USE AS DEFINE BY SLC MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: 21A.62.040: DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: GARAGE: AN ACCESSORY BUILDING OR PORTION OF A BUILDING DESIGNED OR USED FOR THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES USED BY THE OCCUPANTS OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING 21A44.040: REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING (E) NOTE 6 ACCESSORY AND TEMPORPAY USES: NO BICYCLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSORY OF TEMPORARY USES. NOTE:PARKING TIER SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOWN IN THIS CHART DIFFER FROM UBC 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE, AND ARE INSEAD BASED ON PARKING BAYS AND STORY FOOTPRINT NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 5 08/01/2025 Bulletin #5 1 1 5 5 5 * WITHIN THE 10 TOTAL ADA SPACES THERE ARE 8 STANDARD ADA AND 2 VAN ADA ** WITHIN THE 34 TOTAL SPACES THERE ARE 14 COMPACT PARKING SPACES (PENDING THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) *** WITHIN THE 31 TOTAL SPACES THERE ARE 25 COMPACT PARKING SPACES (PENDING THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) jb jb e jb jb jb jb jb jb jbjbjb s ww eeirirfo sdsd s s irir sd fo e s s w s e e e e e w s ir ir e jb jb e jb jb jb jb jbjbjb s um s w S T E M P L E S T N 4 0 0 W 30 0 w 1 0 0 S 122'-1 0 1 / 2 " DELTA CENTERBUILDING TYPE IBFULLY SPRINKLERED[NIC] PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE8 TIERS / 7 STORIESTYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IIB OCCUPANCY CLASS: S-2 FULLY SPRINKLERED EN T R A N C E DN EX I T 8.33% DN NEW PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EX I S T I N G TR U C K E X I T NEW GUARD BOOTH STORA GE ROO M (NIC) STORAGE ROO M ( N I C ) OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW LOADING DOCK COVER EXISTING TRUCK ENTRANCE OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW A8.01 1 NORTHWEST PLAZA [NIC] SOUTHEAST PLAZA [NIC] CORNER SIDE YARD EX I S T I N G S I D E W A L K EX I T ENTR Y NORTHEAST PLAZA [NIC] PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE CE N T E R L I N E O F S T R E E T 41 ' - 7 " Re f e r t o C i v i l S h e e t C 2 . 0 1 f o r C u r b C u t D i m e n s i o n s 10 1 ' - 2 1 / 2 " EXISTING STAIR TO REMAIN (NIC) 4'-9" PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E FR O N T Y A R D 29'-6" 189'- 6 " 51'-4" 57'-0 1/2" 4'- 4 " EXISTING SIDEWALK RETAINING WALL -REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE SEPARATE PERMIT OF ARENA PROJECT FOR CONTINUATION OF ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AND EGRESS TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E PR O P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE A8.02 1 Sim SEE SEPARATE PERMIT OF ARENA PROJECT FOR CONTINUATION OF ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AND EGRESS TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW FOR PAVEMENT FINISH AND MATERIALS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS 1 1 5'-0" 3'-0"4'-0" 4'-0 " 6 ' - 1 " 24"w x24"dx48h Comm. Cabinet 24"wx 3 1 " d x 3 9 " h Trans f o r m e r GUARDBOOTH SEE A8.01 FOR DETAILS GUARDBOOTH REST ROOM PATH 3 3 3 2'-6" 7'-11 3/4"76.62' 76.62' 76.62' 76.50' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62' TOW 76.95'ToW 76.50' 75.98' 58.20'59.00' 60.00' 62.50' 65.00' CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE RAMP RETAINING WALL. FINISH TO MATCH ARENA'S EXISTING CONCRETE WALL. TOP OF CONC. WALL FINISH ELEVATIONS PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK BUILDING FOOTPRINT 60.73'ToW 60.90'ToW 61.10'ToW 61.10' ToW61.10' ToW TOP OF PLANTER WALL ELEVATION CAST IN PLACE PLANTER WALL. FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING ARENA CONCRETE WALL FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES: 1. THE REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW IN ACCORDANCE WITH UFC APPENDIX B, FOR A TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION ACROSS 412,995 SQ.FT IS 8,000 GPM AT 20-PSI FOR 4-HOURS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE B105.2 THE FIRE-FLOW CAN BE REDUCED TO 25% OF THE REQUIRED VALUE FOR AN IFC 903.3.1.1 FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING. THEREFORE, THE REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS 2,000 GPM AT 20-PSI FOR 2-HOURS+ 2. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN BUILDING CODE SECTION 903.3. FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 901.2. INDICATE TYPE OF SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROVIDED AS COMPLYING WITH NFPA 13. 3. PROVIDE AN APPROVED CLASS I STANDPIPE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDING CODE & FIRE CODE SECTION 905. GREATER THAN FOUR STORIES STANDPIPES SHALL BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS IN BUILDING CODE & FIRE CODE SECTION. STANDPIPE SYSTEM PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 901.2. 4. EACH STANDPIPE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED 2 1/2 INCH OUTLET NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET OR MORE THAN 4 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL OF EACH STORY. STANDPIPE OUTLETS IN STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES OR SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE EXIT DOORS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE OUTLET AND LOCATED ON THE MAIN STAIR LANDING. ALL OUTLETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED VALVE, CAP AND CHAINS. FIRE CODE 905.4.3 5. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALL OCCUPANCY GROUPS AND AT SUCH LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE 906. THE FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION OF ALL EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AREA FIRE INSPECTOR. 6. ELEVATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH PHASE I EMERGENCY RECALL OPERATION AND PHASE II EMERGENCY IN-CAR OPERATION. 7. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED TO OPERATE WITH A STANDARDIZED FIRE SERVICE ELEVATOR KEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 604.8. BUILDING CODE 3003.3 8. IN THE EVENT OF POWER SUPPLY FAILURE IN ROOMS, SPACES AND BUILDINGS THAT REQUIRE TWO OR MORE MEANS OF EGRESS, AN EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL SYSTEM FOR A DURATION OF NOT LESS THAN 90 MINUTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN BUILDING CODE 1008.3. 9. THE MEANS OF EGRESS TRAVEL SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT ANY TIME THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED WITH A LIGHT INTENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN 1 FOOT-CANDLE AT THE FLOOR LEVEL. BUILDING CODE 1008.2.1. 10. THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO EXITS SHALL BE MARKED BY READILY VISIBLE EXIT SIGNS TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL AS REQUIRED BY BUILDING CODE 1013.1; AND SHALL BE INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1013.3 AND 1013.5. NOTE: ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF FIELD INSPECTION . SITE PLAN LEGEND: ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PROPERTY LINE SCOPE OF WORK BUILDING FOOTPRINT HIGH IMPACT BOLLARD, REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR DETAIL DN 8.33% DN EX I S T I N G TR U C K E X I T STORA GE ROO M (NIC) STORAGE ROO M ( N I C ) EXISTING TRUCK ENTRANCE OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW PR O P E R T Y L I N E FR O N T Y A R D EXISTING SIDEWALK ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE GRADE PLANE CALCULATION:(BASE LINE ELEVATION 4200') A: (73.5'+74.5')/2 X100.16' = 7,411.83'B: (74.5'+75.5')/2 X221.00' = 16,586.05'C: (75.6'+57.0')/2 X32.16' = 2132.20'D: (57.0'+55.0')/2 X21.66' = 1,212.96'E: (55.0'+58.6')/2 X69.66' = 3,956.68' F: (58.6'+55.2')/2 X134.16' = 7,633.70' G: (55.2'+55.7')/2 X134.50' = 7,458.02'H: (55.7'+52.0')/2 X46.50' = 2,504.02'I: (52.0'+56.1')/2 X52.33' = 2,828.43'J: (56.1'+73.5')/2 X83.00' = 5,378.40' TOTAL PERIMETER = 895.13'/57,102.2957102.29'/895.13'= 63.79' GRADE PLANE = 4263.79' A: (73.5'+74.5')/2 X100.16' = 7,411.83' 221.0 0 ' 100.1 6 ' B: (74.5'+75.5')/2 X221.00' = 16,586.05' C: (75.6'+57.0')/2 X32.16'= 2132.20' E: (55.0'+58.6')/2 X69.66' = 3,956.68' D: (57.0'+55.0')/2 X21.66' = 1,212.96' F: (58.6'+55.2')/2 X134.16' = 7,633.70' G: ( 5 5 . 2 ' + 5 5 . 7 ' ) / 2 X 1 3 4 . 5 0 ' = 7 , 4 5 8 . 0 2 ' H: (55.7'+52.0')/2 X46.50' = 2,504.02' I:(52.0'+56.1')/2 X52.33'= 2,828.43' J: ( 5 6 . 1 ' + 7 3 . 5 ' ) / 2 X 8 3 . 0 0 ' = 5 , 3 7 8 . 4 0 ' 32.16 ' 21.66 ' 69.66 ' 134.16' 13 4 . 5 0 ' 46.50 ' 52.33 ' 83 . 0 0 ' SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 8/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 8 : 3 1 : 0 0 P M SITE PLAN A1.00 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/32" = 1'-0" SITE PLAN1 NREFERE N C E TRU E NOR T H EXPANSION JOINT 1" = 40'-0"3 GRADE PLANE CALCULATION DIAGRAM PER UBC CHAPTER 202 PLAN NOTES NO. DATE REVISION 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 3 05/30/2025 Bulletin #3 5 08/01/2025 Bulletin #5 5 5 RBR - TEST TARGET (0.64FT VERT OFFSET)SHOT ON TOP OF REBAR 5368710074258.85 WV5096eEJB 50974263.28TSJ5098eEJB 50994262.84 WV5100irSBX5101irSBX5102 fo FOB5103 TSJ5104SDI 51054259.49 sdMSD - 4FTX2FT LID 51094259.72sdMSD - 4FTX2FT LID 51104259.42 WV5111 sMS 51124259.11 WV5113WV5114 TSJ5115 TSJ5116 sMS 51194258.62 um MU - UTA 51234258.10 TSJ5124 TSJ5125 jb jb N: 7449078.55E: 1528943.15 N: 7449035.28E: 1528942.89 N: 7449007.51E: 1528942.88 N: 7449006.34E: 1528959.79 N: 7449020.86E: 1528959.88 N: 7449006.86E: 1528950.86 N: 7449028.92 E: 1528951.07 N: 7449058.21 E: 1529006.34 N: 7449022.63E: 1529006.30 N: 7449003.50E: 1528967.31 N: 7448996.13E: 1528981.58 N: 7448998.91E: 1528983.85 N: 7448988.99E: 1528959.12 N: 7448988.23 E: 1528951.67 N: 7449023.63E: 1528999.68 N: 7449057.99E: 1528970.45 N: 7449066.24E: 1528959.55 N: 7449066.45E: 1528951.74 N: 7449071.01 E: 1528946.54 SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED GATE, BOLLARD PAVEMENT STRIPING(SEE STRIPING & SIGNAGELEGEND) SIGN FENCE-BARBED FENCE-DECORATIVE COLLECTING CURB &GUTTER SHEDDING CURB & GUTTER ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT PAVERS BUILDING PROPERTY LINES SECTIONS SETBACKS SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY RIGHT OF WAY ADJOINING PROPERTIES SAWCUT STRUCTURES VEGETATION SLOPE EDGES CENTERLINE CUT LIMIT FILL LIMIT PARK STRIP LANDSCAPING SHEET NOTES 1. THE ENGINEER HAS MADE AN EXTENSIVE EFFORT TO LOCATE ALLEXISTING UTILITY LINES FROM RECORDS PROVIDED BY OTHERS ANDEVIDENCE IN THE FIELD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. KEYED NOTES CONCRETE RAMP PAVEMENT SECTION PER DETAIL 2/CP501 NOT USED 6" WHITE SOLID PAINT 6" YELLOW SOLID PAINT WHITE ARROW PAINT R1-2 YIELD SIGN 18" WIDE RAISED CURB PER DETAIL 4/CP5.01 NO PARKING CROSS HATCHING 4" 3' O.C. PAINTED WHITE RETAINING WALL NEW CONCRETE FLATWORK TO NEAREST JOINT PER DETAIL 12/C5.01 PATTERNED CONCRETE PER SLC STANDARD LANDSCAPING BY OTHERS TYPE P ISLAND CURB PER DETAIL 6/CP501 INSTALL TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA STANDARDS LOADING AREA CONCRETE PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PER DETAIL3/CP501 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION REPLACEMENT PER DETAIL 1/CP501 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 -- - - | 0 2 : 5 1 P M F R I D A Y 0 7 M A R C H 2 0 2 5 | Q : \ ! 2 0 2 4 \ U T - 1 0 2 6 7 - 2 4 D E L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G \ P R O J E C T D A T A \ S H E E T _ F I L E S \ C 2 . 0 1 S I T E . D W G 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 FT 20100 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C2.02 1 5 5 3 13 79 9 15' 14' 13' R0.5' R2.5' R14.0'13 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 1 10/31/2024 50% DD CIVIL ENGINEER HORROCKS4919 S 1500 W STE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE: 801.626.2300 DE L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G ST R U C T U R E 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 NO. DATE REVISION 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD CS/MM GN LA Phase 1 Permit Set 03/07/2025 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set SITE PLAN 9 9 3 3 R10.0' 7 R1.8' CONSTRUCTION BOUNDARY YIELD 6 C2.01 5' 3' 14 14 14 14 R27.1' 32 ' 43 ' R28.3' 13 R63.5' R84.0' R14.0' eeirir sdsd s s jb jb 4257.93 TBC 4257.83 TBC 4258.2 EG 4273.00 BW 4275.86 TW 4258.00 BW 4261.00 BW 4261.00 BW 4258.97 TBC 4259.07 TBC 4258.27 TBC 4258.11 TBC 4258.44 TBC 4257.96 TBC 4260.32 TBC 4258.66 TBC 4258.90 TBC 4259.85 TBC-1.93 % -3.45% 42 6 0 42 7 0 427 0 42 6 2 42 6 4 42 6 6 42 6 8 4270 4270 427 0 42 7 0 42 6 0 42 7 0 42 5 8 4258 42 6 2 42 6 4 42 6 6 42 6 8 42 7 2 4260425 9 4260 425 9 4260 42 5 8 4259 4261 42 6 0 42 7 0 42 6 2 42 6 4 42 6 6 42 6 8 42 7 2 4258.60 TBC 4262.00 BW 4260.00 BW 4264.00 BW 4261.00 BW 4258.63 TBC 4276.00 TW 4264.91 TW 4273.50 TW 4276.30 TW 4260.11 TW 4260.06 TBC 4273.44 TW 4269.93 BW 4261.00 BW ABBREVIATIONS EC EDGE OF CONCRETE EG EXISTING GRADE FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEV FG FINISH GRADE FL FLOW LINE TBC TOP BACK OF CURB TC TOP OF CONCRETE TOA TOP OF ASPHALT TW TOP OF WALL BW BOTTOM OF WALL GRADING PLAN LEGEND XXX.XX SPOT ELEVATION SLOPE OF FINISH GRADE COLLECTING GUTTER SHEDDING GUTTER GRADE BREAK EX. MAJOR CONTOUR EX. MINOR CONTOUR MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY EASEMENT X.XX% 4201 4200 4201 4200 SHEET NOTES 1. THE ENGINEER HAS MADE AN EXTENSIVE EFFORT TO LOCATE ALLEXISTING UTILITY LINES FROM RECORDS PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND EVIDENCE IN THE FIELD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. -- - - | 1 1 : 2 4 A M M O N D A Y 0 7 A P R I L 2 0 2 5 | Q : \ ! 2 0 2 4 \ U T - 1 0 2 6 7 - 2 4 D E L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G \ P R O J E C T D A T A \ S H E E T _ F I L E S \ C 4 . 0 1 G R A D I N G . D W G 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 FT 20100 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C4.02 RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL C4.01 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 1 10/31/2024 50% DD CIVIL ENGINEER HORROCKS4919 S 1500 W STE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE: 801.626.2300 DE L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G ST R U C T U R E 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 NO. DATE REVISION 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD AM/MM GN LA Phase 2 Permit Set 04/07/2025 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set GRADING PLAN s s irir ir sd e s jb jb jb jb 4257.4 EG 4262.24 TBC 4266.40 TW 4264.04 TBC 4267.81 TBC 4275.90 TW 4275.84 TW 4265.49 TBC 4265.90 TBC 4270.06 TBC 4272.30 TBC 4273.64 TBC4273.04 TBC 4268.99 TBC 4266.72 TBC 4264.45 TBC 4260.74 TBC 4259.19 TBC 4258.45 TBC 4272.46 BW 4275.77 TW 4276.00 TW 4277.01 TW 4277.56 TW 4275.71 TW 4274.24 TW 4272.39 TW 4270.39 TW 4268.39 TW 4264.37 TW 4271.26 TBC 4262.79 TW 4257.6 EG 4257.3 EG 4257.0 EG 4256.7 EG 4256.7 EG 4256.6 EG 4273.56 TBC4276.40 TW 4260.26 TOA 4262.02 TOA 4264.23 TOA 4266.50 TOA 4274.46 TOA 4271.05 TOA 4272.77 TOA -3 . 1 0 % -9 . 0 9 % -4. 2 8 % -9 . 0 9 % 42 6 0 42 7 0 42 5 8 4258 42 6 2 42 6 4 42 6 6 42 6 8 42 7 2 42 6 0 42 7 0 42 7 0 42 7 0 42 5 8 42 6 2 42 6 4 42 6 6 42 6 8 42 7 2 42 7 2 42 7 2 42 7 4 42 7 6 4260 42 6 0 4270 42 7 0 4256 4256 42 5 6 42 5 6 42 5 8 42584262 42 6 2 4264 42 6 4 4266 42 6 6 4268 42 6 8 4272 42 7 2 4274 42 7 4 4276 42 7 6 4260 4260 42 5 8 4259 4261 4257.6 EG 4257.7 EG 4261.80 TW 4257.7 EG 4275.95 TW 4272.34 BW 4272.29 BW 4272.22 BW 4272.17 BW 4272.26 BW 4272.59 BW 4273.50 TC 4273.55 TC 4273.60 TC -2.25% -1 . 2 9 % 4278.00 TW 4273.0 EG 4256.7 EG 4258.00 BW4257.7 EG 4257.6 EG 4257.5 EG 4257.3 EG 4257.2 EG 4257.4 EG 4258.00 BW 4258.00 BW 4258.00 BW 4258.00 BW 4257.00 BW 4257.00 BW 4257.00 BW 4257.00 BW 4257.00 BW 4256.7 EG 4256.9 EG 4256.6 EG 4256.5 EG 4256.4 EG ABBREVIATIONS EC EDGE OF CONCRETE EG EXISTING GRADE FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEV FG FINISH GRADE FL FLOW LINE TBC TOP BACK OF CURB TC TOP OF CONCRETE TOA TOP OF ASPHALT TW TOP OF WALL BW BOTTOM OF WALL GRADING PLAN LEGEND XXX.XX SPOT ELEVATION SLOPE OF FINISH GRADE COLLECTING GUTTER SHEDDING GUTTER GRADE BREAK EX. MAJOR CONTOUR EX. MINOR CONTOUR MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY EASEMENT X.XX% 4201 4200 4201 4200 SHEET NOTES 1. THE ENGINEER HAS MADE AN EXTENSIVE EFFORT TO LOCATE ALLEXISTING UTILITY LINES FROM RECORDS PROVIDED BY OTHERS ANDEVIDENCE IN THE FIELD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. -- - - | 1 0 : 3 5 A M M O N D A Y 0 7 A P R I L 2 0 2 5 | Q : \ ! 2 0 2 4 \ U T - 1 0 2 6 7 - 2 4 D E L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G \ P R O J E C T D A T A \ S H E E T _ F I L E S \ C 4 . 0 1 G R A D I N G . D W G 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 FT 20100 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C4.03 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C4.01 ARENA FFE (FLOOR 3) = 4275.146 FT C4.02 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 1 10/31/2024 50% DD CIVIL ENGINEER HORROCKS4919 S 1500 W STE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE: 801.626.2300 DE L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G ST R U C T U R E 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 NO. DATE REVISION 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD AM/MM GN LA Phase 2 Permit Set 04/07/2025 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set GRADING PLAN e e jb jb e jb jb jb jb jbjb jb jb jb jb jb e jb jbjb jb jb jb jbjbsdsdsdsd sdsd 4260 42 6 0 4270 42 7 0 4256 4256 42 5 6 42 5 6 42 5 8 42584262 42 6 2 4264 42 6 4 4266 42 6 6 4268 42 6 8 4272 42 7 2 4274 42 7 4 4276 42 7 6 4242 42 4 4 42 4 6 424 8 42 5 0 42 6 0 4242 4244 4246 42 4 8 42 5 2 42 5 4 42 5 6 42 5 8 4250 4248 4252 4254 42 5 6 42 5 6 ABBREVIATIONS EC EDGE OF CONCRETE EG EXISTING GRADE FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEV FG FINISH GRADE FL FLOW LINE TBC TOP BACK OF CURB TC TOP OF CONCRETE TOA TOP OF ASPHALT TW TOP OF WALL BW BOTTOM OF WALL GRADING PLAN LEGEND XXX.XX SPOT ELEVATION SLOPE OF FINISH GRADE COLLECTING GUTTER SHEDDING GUTTER GRADE BREAK EX. MAJOR CONTOUR EX. MINOR CONTOUR MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARY SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY EASEMENT X.XX% 4201 4200 4201 4200 SHEET NOTES 1. THE ENGINEER HAS MADE AN EXTENSIVE EFFORT TO LOCATE ALLEXISTING UTILITY LINES FROM RECORDS PROVIDED BY OTHERS ANDEVIDENCE IN THE FIELD. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITYLOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. -- - - | 1 0 : 3 6 A M M O N D A Y 0 7 A P R I L 2 0 2 5 | Q : \ ! 2 0 2 4 \ U T - 1 0 2 6 7 - 2 4 D E L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G \ P R O J E C T D A T A \ S H E E T _ F I L E S \ C 4 . 0 1 G R A D I N G . D W G 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 FT 20100 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C4.02 ARENA FFE (FLOOR 3) = 4275.146 PARKING STRUCTURE BY OTHERS FFE (FLOOR 2) = 4274.00' C4.03 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 1 10/31/2024 50% DD CIVIL ENGINEER HORROCKS4919 S 1500 W STE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE: 801.626.2300 DE L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G ST R U C T U R E 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 NO. DATE REVISION 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD AM/MM GN LA Phase 2 Permit Set 04/07/2025 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set GRADING PLAN NO WORK THIS SHEET 6" 6" 6" 5'-7" LANDSCAPE SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS R 3' - 0" R 2 6' - 6" R 2' - 4" R 22 ' - 0" R 14' - 0" R 48' - 6" 18'-8 7/8" 2'-6" 7'-6" 1'-6" 3'-5" 3'-11" 2'-6" 1'-1 3/8" 6 3/8" 6" 6'-2" 10'-1" 58'-7 7/8" 59'- 9" 14 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 19'-6" R 32' - 0" R 60' - 8 1/2" R 48' - 6" 6'-7" PAVED AREA W/OUT SNOW MELTING SYSTEM SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS PAVED AREA WITH SNOW MELTING SYSTEM SIDEWALK REFER TO CIVIL C2.01 SIDEWALK REFER TO CIVIL C2.01 SIDEWALK REFER TO CIVIL C2.01 LANDSCAPE SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS NORTHWEST PLAZA [NIC] A5.02 5 A5.02 1 A5.01 8 SIM. 5'-6" 19'-6"7'-0" 24'-0 3/4" 3'-0" A5.01 5 SIM. 23'-3" 32'-4 7/8" 3'-0" 5' - 1 0 " 3' - 0 " 23 ' - 0 " 137.79 9'-11" 3'-0" 3'-0" R 50' - 0" R 41' - 0" 2'-6" R 52' - 3" RETAINING WALL SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING ARENA STAIRS (NIC) 37 ' - 1 0 1 / 2 " 6 A8.03 6 A8.03 9 A8.03 PR O P E R T Y L I N E CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS EXISTING ARENA STAIRS (NIC) GA T E W A Y A B O V E 1'-0" 7'-6" ENTRY GATEWAY ABOVE SEE: A8.03 2' - 6 " 4'-5" SIDEWALK REFER TO CIVIL C2.01 DRAWINGS 4'-0" 2'-0" 1'-6" 6'-4" 8'-0" 1'-7" WATERPROOFING SYSTEM SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. NOTE: FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS SEE CIVIL C401, C402, & C403. 3.7 11.1 11.1 5.8 3.11 11.6 11.1 5.8 11.6 3.11 3.11 11.4 1'-6" 11.4 3.11 5.8 9.2 10.1 10.1 5.19 5.19 10.10 A8.037 A8.038 3.11 6'-6" 13'-0" 6'-6" 6'-6" 1'-4" 10'-0" 2'-6" 2'-6" 8'-9" 7'-5 3/4" 2'-6" 5'-8 1/4" 1'-6" 8'-6" 1'-6" 6'-0 1/4"10'-0" 10'-0" 10.16 10.16 10.16 2'-6"4'-8 1/2" 5'-6" 6'-0" 17'-6" 3'-6" 6'-0" 3'-5" 4'-6" 4'-6" PAVED AREA WITH SNOW MELTING SYSTEM PAVED AREA WITH SNOW MELTING SYSTEM1'-6" 1'-6" A8.04 2 4'-6"4'-6"4'-6" GUARD BOOTH 4 4 3'-0" Ø, CENTERED ON ENTRY PORTAL PILASTER/COLUMN ENTRY PORTAL FOUNDATION PER 9/G S4.10. GC TO COORDINATE WITH ENTRY PORTAL DELEGATED DESIGNER PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT PLACEMENT OF FOUNDATION MATERIAL. 3'-0" Ø, CENTERED ON ENTRY PORTAL PILASTER/COLUMN ENTRY PORTAL FOUNDATION PER 9/G S4.10. GC TO COORDINATE WITH ENTRY PORTAL DELEGATED DESIGNER PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT PLACEMENT OF FOUNDATION MATERIAL. 4 4 17'-8" 11'-1 1" 12'-3 " 7/ 2 / 2 0 2 5 7 : 5 3 : 0 7 A M 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 1/4" = 1'-0"1 CONTROLS - 1 1 3 0" 17'-6 " 17' - 6 " 17 ' - 6 " 18'-8 7/8" 2'-6" 7'-6" 1'-6" 3'-5" 3'-11" 2'-6" 58'-7 7/8" 3'-0" 32'-4 7/8" 3'-0" 7'-6" 6'-4" 11.1 1 10.1 5.19 6'-6" 6'-0 1/ 4" 10'-0" 10.16 10.16 3P E9EDPF 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" Pending "Master Development Agreement" 07/02/2025 Corner of the retaining wall Corner of the Guard Booth Retaining Wall End of the Street Retaining Wall 3.11 11.1 5.8 10.1 5.19 3.2 5.8 11.1 10.1 3.11 5.19 5.8 5.19 10.110.1 11.1 11.4 5.83.11 11.1 11.4 3.2 3.11 3.14 EXIT LANE (2) EXIT LANE (3) ENTRY LANE (1) 5.19 5.19 10.1 11.1 3.11 3.113.2 5.19 ENTRY LANE (1) EXIT LANE (2) EXIT LANE (3) PARKING GATEWAY - ISOMETRIC2 PARKING GATEWAY - EXIT POV1 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 5/ 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 0 4 : 1 6 P M ENTRANCE GATEWAY DETAILS A8.03 Phase 2 Permit Set 02/17/25 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA/YC SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION - GATEWAY ENTRANCE9 1/4" = 1'-0" SECTION - GATEWAY EXIT6 Key Value Keynote Text 3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 3.11 CONCRETE CURB/ISLAND 6" HIGH, REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.01 3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM. 10.1 OVERHEAD VEHICLE ENTRY/EXIT BARRIER BAR - REFER TO A9.11 11.1 BARRIER GATE WITH GATE ARMS, TYP. 11.4 EXIT STATION, TYP. 1/4" = 1'-0" GATEWAY EXIT7 1/4" = 1'-0" GATEWAY ENTRANCE8 NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 2 05/19/2025 Bulletin #2 2 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 7/ 1 4 / 2 0 2 5 8 : 2 6 : 5 6 P M AXONOMETRICS A1.04 Bulletin 4 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP AXONOMETRIC VIEW - EAST1AXONOMETRIC VIEW - SOUTH3 AXONOMETRIC VIEW - WEST4 AXONOMETRIC VIEW - NORTH2 NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 5 07/??/2025 Bulletin #5 5 RAMP UP EXISTING VEHICULAR RAMP TO REMAIN RAMP EXISTING VEHICUL AR RAMP T O R EMAIN 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.01 1 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.1 G.2 G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 1 A3.06 10.38 % 5.14 5.15 5.14 21.2 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 A4.08 1 ARENA STAIR [NIC] TRASH ROOM [NIC] EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING TRANSFORMER EXISTING TRANSFORMER LOADING AREA UNDER EXISTING ARENA [NIC] LOADING AREA UNDER NEW PLARKING STRUCTURE G.6 G.7.9G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.C G.Q 1 A3.08 T A4 22'-6"22'-6"27'-9"21'-0"35'-4 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2" 11'-7 1/2" 8'-5 1/2" 3'-2"30'-0" 51 ' - 8 " 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 194'-0"5'-0" 27 2 ' - 2 " ARENA GRID LINE VERIFY IN FIELD ARENA GRID LINE VERIFY IN FIELD AR E N A G R I D L I N E VE R I F Y I N F I E L D AR E N A G R I D L I N E VE R I F Y I N F I E L D STAIR #3 101 5.15 5.14 5.14 43.37 ' 43.3 7 ' 45.3 7 ' 44.02' 39.42' 39.42' 45.37 ' 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 2'- 9 1 / 2 " EXISTING PLAYOFF PRESS CONFERENCE [NIC] ELEVATOR PIT ABOVE, 28'-8" HEADROOM CLEARANCE SEE SHEET 1/A4.05 CONCRETE FLOOR TO BE PARTIALLY REPAIRED UP 7.8 8 % ELECTRICAL ROOM (NIC) ICE ROOM (NIC) CONTRACTOR LABOR WAITING AREA (NIC)CORRIDOR (NIC) GENERATOR (NIC) SERVICE (NIC) SERVICE (NIC) SERVICE (NIC) CONTROL (NIC) CONTROL ROOM (NIC) TRUCK PARKING AREA (NIC) SERVICE (NIC) LOADING RAMP (NIC) TRUCK PARKING AREA (NIC) MECHANICAL ROOM (NIC) ELEVATOR #3 FOOTPRINT OF OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVE 21.1DSP DSP 01 A4.10 1 100 S N 400 W PROPERTY LINE PARKING STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT ABOVE 21.2 FEC FOOTINGS BELOW GRADE SEE STRUCTURAL G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 G.C.4 LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN (NIC) LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORKEXISTING BOLLARDS TO REMAIN EXISTING BOLLARDS TO REMAIN WA4 4'- 7 " 4 ' - 7 " 4 ' - 7 " 4 ' - 7 " 16 ' - 7 " 12 ' - 1 0 " 4'-3" 4'-3" 4'-3" 6'-6" 4'-7" 4 ' - 7 " 4'-1 1/2" 3'-10" 3'-10" 3'-10" 1'-0" 3'-5" 3'-5" 9" 1 ' - 7 " 5.8 5.8 MAX. 2% SLOPE. MAX. 4.99% SLOPE IN DIRECTION OF TRAVEL MAX. 2% SLOPE WHERE DOOR TBD RELOCATED CATCH BASIN'S APPROX. NEW LOCATION CONC. OVERPOUR TO MAINTAIN 1% SLOPE TOWARD RELOCATED CATCH BASIN 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 14'-10" MINIMUM FOR TRUCK MANUEVERING HEADROOM DIAGRAM TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 7 / 2 0 2 5 2 : 1 2 : 2 3 P M PARKING PLAN - LOWER LEVEL B1 (BASEMENT) A2.00 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 3/32" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LOWER LEVEL B1 (BASEMENT)1 Key Value Keynote Text 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 21.1 FIRE SPRINKLER RISER/STANDPIPE - REFER TO DETAIL 12/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 NREFERENCE TRUENORTH FOOTPRINT OF OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVE FOOTPRINT OF OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVE EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN PARKING STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set UPUPUP DN UP RA M P U P 6.6 2 % RA M P D N 6.6 2 % RA M P U P 6.6 2 % 6" 6" UP 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 7'- 6 " 8'- 2 " 10 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 9 0 ' - 0 " 10 1/2"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"2'-0"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6" G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 3 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 10 1 13 1A-28 1B-35 1 A3.06 2'-8 1/2"8'-6"2 @ 9'-0" = 18'-0"4 @ 8'-6" = 34'-0"17'-0 1/2" 1 10'-0"2'-0"10'-0" OPEN TO BELOW 1C-7 22 ' - 9 " 24 ' - 1 " 18 ' - 5 " 1 2 5 1 ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 1 7 1/2" 10'-0" 2'-0" 10'-0" PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO ARENA OVERHEAD 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " UP DN UP DNDNUP FEC FEC FEC 8" 5'-8" 6.8 2 % 4'- 5 " 13 ' - 1 " 5'- 4 " 16'-9 1/2"23'-10"2 @ 8'-6" = 17'-0" 1'-4" 8" 18 ' - 5 " 2'- 8 1 / 2 " 8'- 0 " 8 ' - 0 " 9 ' - 6 " 10 @ 9 ' - 4 " = 9 3 ' - 4 " 8'- 0 " 1 ' - 2 " 4 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 4 1 / 2 " 18'-4 1/2"4'-0"3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-0"8'-0"8'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 11'-1 1/2"6'-0"11'-9" 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 1 " 6'- 0 " 10 ' - 5 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 7 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 6 3 ' - 0 " 3'- 4 " 18 ' - 5 " 24 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 1 0 " 3 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 2 7 ' - 0 " 8" 24 ' - 1 " A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 22.2 21.2 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.5 5.5 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 1'-0" 7'-4 1/2" 5'-6" 5'-6" 5'-6" 5'-6" 5'-6" 5'-6" 1'-3" 1'- 3 " 1'-0" 5'- 1 " 12 A1.06 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 2 A4.17 1 A6.06 ARENA STORAGE ROOM BELOW [NIC] R 14' - 9"R 14' - 11 1/2" A4.16 5 G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2" 2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2" 121'-3" 21 0 ' - 0 " AR E N A G R I D L I N E ARENA GRID LINE 1'-3 1/2" 2'-0" 2'-0" ELECTRICAL ROOM 102 FOR BRIDGE CONNECTION, SEE SHEET A4.15 ARENA [NIC] A4.17 1 FOR GUARD BOOTH, SEE SHEET A8.04 FIRE RISER ROOM 103 UTILITY ROOM 104 5.5 5.5 STAIR #3 101 PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 9.29.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 74.00' 74.00'74.00'74.50'74.00' 74.00' 79.96' 79.96'79.96' 79.96' 1 A0.03 5.8 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.14 5.14 9.10 A5.01 7 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.15 9.10 9.10 9.6 9.6 9.10 9.10 9.10 A5.11 5 WA5 WA1 WB2 WC2 WA1 WB1 WA4 WA2 WB1 22.2 15 ' - 4 1 / 2 " ELEVATOR #3 ROOF DECK 1'- 1 " 6'- 5 " 5 ' - 3 " 1 ' - 3 " 9 1/2" 5'-3" 4'-6" 4'-6" 5'-3" AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2'-10" 18 ' - 6 " 9'-6 1/2" 2'-1" A4.10 2 02 05 03 04 10 11 17 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 6 " 17 ' - 6 " WA5 10" 8'-0" 10 ' - 0 " PROPERTY LINE G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21.1 5.2 21.1 07 3'-7 1/2" 6'-1 1/2" 6'-3 1/2" 06 09 4'-2" SEE SHEET A8.02 FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO A 2.02A FOR LOADING DOCK COVER 5'-0" 4'-6" 5'-0" 1 WA1WC2 WB2 WB2 WB2 WA2 WA3 WB1 WA4 WA4 WA1 2'-3 1/2" 2'- 3 1 / 2 " EXISTING VEHICLE RAMP BELOW EXISTING VEHICLE RAMP BELOW ø 5'-0" 18'-6"10'-8"11'-0 1/2" 07 79.96' 79.96' 79.96' A4.08 5 A4.01 2 A4.16 6 2 22.12 22.12 WC1 1 1 1 1 1 75.79' 78.17' 81.75' 79.96' 74.00' 1 1 74.00' 74.00' 73.00' 74.80' 77.18'80.75' 78.96' 84.12' 74.00' 1 3 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD OR HIGH IMPACT BOLLARD, SEE OR DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 10/A7.02 G.5G.4 G.9 G.D G.F G.G G.N G.O G.E G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.M G.P G.7.5G.5.5 G.6 G.8 HEADROOM DIAGRAM LEGEND 8'-2" MIN. HEADROOM AT ACCESSIBLE PARKING ROUTES LEADING TO AND FROM VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND THE SPACE ITSELF. ALL OTHER AREAS WHERE CARS MAY PARK OR CIRCULATE AND PEDESTRAIN MAY TRAVEL WITHIN THE PARKING LEVELS MUST HAVE 7'-0" MIN. CLEAR HEADROOM. SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 5/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 1 3 : 4 6 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 1 A2.01 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 11 Key Value Keynote Text 5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.6 ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5.01 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.1 FIRE SPRINKLER RISER/STANDPIPE - REFER TO DETAIL 12/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. 22.12 PIPES - REFER TO 4/7.01, 5/7.02, 6/7.01, 7/7.02 FOR PIPE PROTECTION DETAILS NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 3 05/30/2025 Bulletin #3 UP DN UP DN RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P U P 5.5 6 % RA M P D N 6.6 2 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 4 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 9 1 14 2A-312B-35 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"2'-0"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"1'-10 1/2" 17 ' - 6 " 34 ' - 1 0 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 6 " 1'- 2 1 / 2 " 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 3'-0"3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0" 4'-0" 3'-4 1/2"15'-0" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"2'-10"18'-4 1/2" A4.01 3ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 2 1B- FEC UPDN UPDN FIRE RISER ROOM 201 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 91.42' 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 10 ' - 1 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 23 ' - 6 " 11 " 10 ' - 1 1 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 3'- 5 " 3'- 4 " 3'-4 1/2" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 5.15 5.14 5.14 5.155.14 5.15 5.14 9.2 22.2 21.2 9.2 9.2 22.2 9.2 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 A3.01 1 7.3 12 A1.06 A4.18 1 2'- 8 " 4 ' - 6 " 4'- 6 " 4'- 6 " 4'- 6 " 34'-4 1/2" 9'-2" 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 1'-4" 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 2 A4.17 1 A6.06 A4.08 6 ARENA LOBBY RAMP [NIC] ARENA STAIR [NIC] ARENA GARAGE [NIC] ARENA EMPLOYEE LOBBY [NIC] 1'-0" R 14' - 9"R 14' - 9" 2'-0" R 14' - 8 1/2"R 14' - 8 1/2" 1'-0" 1'- 0 " G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " AR E N A G R I D L I N E , VE R I F Y I N F I E L D ARENA GRID LINE, VERIFY IN FIELD 4'-0" FEC FEC A2.02A 1 UP DN UP DN 5.5 5.5 5.5 PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 9.2 9.2 79.96' 90.96' 91.41' 89.92' 89.92'89.92' 89.31' 87.11' 89.92' 82.47' 93.84' 21.2 5.5 5.8 5.15 5.15 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 9.6 9.10 9.10 5.8 9.10 9.10 5.14 5.14 5.14 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 1'-2" WA1 WA1 WB1 WA1 WA4 WC1 12 NEW ELEVATOR AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2'-10" 5'-6" 5'-6" 8'-5" 9'- 2 " 1 A4.10 3 13 STORAGE AREA BELOW (NIC) 8'-0" PROPERTY LINE STORAGE AREA BELOW (NIC) SEE SEPARATE PERMIT FOR DOORS AND WALLS AT ARENA CONNECTION POINT 3" 2'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 2'-0" 2'-0" 4'- 0 " G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2" 2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 121'-3" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 4" LOADING DOCK COVER 2.49% 1.60% WA4 WA4 WA1 WA2 WA3 WA4 WC1 WC1 WC1 WC1 WC1 WC1 CC1 FD1 FD1 9" 16 ' - 3 " A7.01 9 5'-3" 1 A4.199 A4.18 31'-3"11 ' - 0 " 11'-3 1/2" 38 ' - 1 1 " 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 3 8 : 2 1 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 2 A2.02 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 21 Key Value Keynote Text 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 7.3 ELASTOMERIC COATING OVER ROOM BELOW - SEE SPECIFICATION 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.6 ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5.01 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set UP DN 1 A7-110.PH3 RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P U P 5.5 6 % RA M P D N 5.5 6 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 4 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 9 1 16 1 3A-333B-35 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 A4.01 4ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 3 2B- FEC UP DN UP DNUPDN UPDN FIRE RISER ROOM 302 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO ARENA 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 18'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0" 4'-0" 3'-8" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6" 2'-10" 18'-4 1/2" 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 3'- 4 " 3'- 5 " 17 ' - 6 " 34 ' - 1 0 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 6 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 16 ' - 1 1 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 18 ' - 4 " 10 ' - 1 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 9.2 9.2 5.5 9.2 9.2 22.2 21.2 9.2 5.15 5.14 5.14 21.2 22.2 5.14 5.15 5.155.14 5.15 ELEV. #2 ELEV.#1 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 1 A6.06 ARENA LOBBY RAMP [NIC] ARENA EMPLOYEE LOBBY [NIC] ARENA FIRST AID [NIC] 1'-0" R 14' - 9"R 14' - 9" 2'-0" G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " A3.01 1 AR E N A G R I D L I N E , VE R I F Y I N F I E L D ARENA GRID LINE, VERIFY IN FIELD ELECTRICAL ROOM 301 A4.18 4 10'-6" 2" 5.5 5.55.5 PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 2'-0" 2'-0" 9.2 95.96'95.96' 96.42' 97.61' 99.81' 101.46' 100.19' 101.4 6 ' 94.46' 102.96' 104.38' 93.92' FEC 5.145.15 FEC 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 5.15 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.15 5.14 9.10 5.14 5.14 5.8 5.8 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 WA1 WA4 WD1 WA1 WB1 AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2'-10" 4'- 0 " 2'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 4'- 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 6 " 2 ' - 8 " 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 15'-0" PROP E R T Y LINE 15 14 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2" 2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 121'-3" 4" WB1 WB1 WA3 WA2 WD1 WA1 WA1 WA1 WA1 WA1 ? WA1 WA1 FD1 FD1 9'- 4 1 / 2 " A7.01 9 5'-3" 10'-9 1/2"7'-2" 22.12 22.12 1 A4.199 A4.18 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 31 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 3 8 : 5 4 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 3 A2.03 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP Key Value Keynote Text 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. 22.12 PIPES - REFER TO 4/7.01, 5/7.02, 6/7.01, 7/7.02 FOR PIPE PROTECTION DETAILS NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set UP DN DN UP RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P U P 5.5 6 % RA M P D N 5.5 6 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 4 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 9 1 16 1 4A-334B-35 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"2'-0"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"1'-10 1/2" A4.01 5ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 4 3B- FEC UP DN UP DNUPDN UPDN FIRE RISER ROOM 401 18 ' - 4 " 3'- 5 " 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 5 " 18'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0" 3'-8" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6" 2'-10" 18'-4 1/2" 3'- 5 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 3'- 4 " 17 ' - 6 " 34 ' - 1 0 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 6 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"18'-4 1/2"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 10 ' - 1 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 10 ' - 1 1 " A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 9.2 22.2 21.2 5.15 9.2 9.2 5.15 5.14 9.10 9.2 5.155.14 5.15 22.2 9.2 5.14 7.3 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 6'-9 1/2" 18 ' - 4 " 5'- 4 1 / 2 " 8 ' - 0 " 8'- 6 " 8 ' - 6 " 13 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 1 7 ' - 0 " 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 1 A6.06 ARENA [NIC] ARENA STAIR [NIC] 5.5 2'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0" R 14' - 8 1/2"R 14' - 8 1/2" 2'-0" R 14' - 9"R 14' - 9" 5.2 G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " A3.01 1 AR E N A G R I D L I N E , VE R I F Y I N F I E L D ARENA GRID LINE, VERIFY IN FIELD 1'- 0 " 3'-6" 5.5 5.55.5 5'- 6 " 5 ' - 6 " 4 ' - 2 " 15'-0" PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 2'-0" 2'-0" 9.2 106.46' 106.46' 108.11' 110.31' 111.96' 111.9 6 ' 113.46' 104.96' 106.46' 114.88' 104.43' 5.15 5.14 5.15 5.155.14 5.14 5.14 5.155.15 21.2 FEC FEC 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.8 5.8 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.6 9.6 9.10 9.10 9.10 WA1 WA1 WB1 WA4WA1 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 2'-10" AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 4'- 0 " 2'- 0 " 4'-0" 4'- 0 " 5'- 2 " 7'-2" PROP E R T Y LINE 16 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2" 2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 121'-3" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 4" WA1 WA4 WA2 WA3 WA2 22.12 22.12 1 A4.19 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 3 9 : 2 4 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 4 A2.04 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 41 Key Value Keynote Text 5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 7.3 ELASTOMERIC COATING OVER ROOM BELOW - SEE SPECIFICATION 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.6 ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5.01 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. 22.12 PIPES - REFER TO 4/7.01, 5/7.02, 6/7.01, 7/7.02 FOR PIPE PROTECTION DETAILS NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set UP DN RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P U P 5.5 6 % RA M P D N 5.5 6 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 4 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 9 1 16 1 5A-335B-35 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 10 1/2"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"2'-0"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"1'-10 1/2" A4.01 6ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 5 4B- FEC UP DN UP DNUPDN UPDN FIRE RISER ROOM 502 121.92' 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 18 ' - 5 " 18'-4 1/2" 3'-0" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0" 4'-0" 3'-8" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6" 2'-10" 18'-4 1/2" 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 3'- 5 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 11 " 17 ' - 6 " 34 ' - 1 0 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 6 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 10 ' - 1 1 " 18 ' - 5 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 10 ' - 1 0 " 2'-0" 2'-0" A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 5.15 5.14 5.14 9.2 22.2 21.2 5.14 5.14 22.2 21.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 2 A6.03 3 A6.01 5'-4 1/2" 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 1 A6.06 ARENA [NIC] R 14' - 8 1/2"R 14' - 8 1/2" R 14' - 9" R 14' - 9" 1'-0" 1'-0" G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 A3.01 1 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " AR E N A G R I D L I N E , VE R I F Y I N F I E L D ELECTRICAL ROOM 501 5.55.5 5.5 2" 10'-6" PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 2'-0" 2'-0" 9.2 116.96'116.96' 117.42' 118.61' 120.81' 122.4 6 ' 122.46' 123.96' 115.46' 125.34' 114.93' 116.43' 5.8 5.8 122.92' 5.15 5.15 5.15 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.145.15 5.15 5.149.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.109.10 WA1 WA1 WB1 WA1 WA4 WB1 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 2'-10" AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 4'- 0 " 4'-0" 2'- 0 " 4'- 0 " PROP E R T Y LINE 7'-2" 18 17 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3"7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2"3'-2"2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2"5'-0" 121'-3" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 4" WB1 WB1 WB1 WA2 WA2 WA3 ARENA GRID LINE, VERIFY IN FIELD 22.12 22.12 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 51 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 3 9 : 5 3 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 5 A2.05 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP Key Value Keynote Text 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. 22.12 PIPES - REFER TO 4/7.01, 5/7.02, 6/7.01, 7/7.02 FOR PIPE PROTECTION DETAILS NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set UP DN RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P U P 5.5 6 % RA M P D N 5.5 6 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 5 1 4 1 1- 1 6 1- 9 9 1 16 1 6A-336B-35 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 11"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"2'-0"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6"1'-11" A4.02 1ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 6 5B- T.D. UP DN UP DNUPDN UPDN FIRE RISER ROOM 602 132.42' 126.92' 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 18'-4 1/2"3'-0"3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0" 4'-0" 3'-8" 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"2'-10" 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 3'- 5 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 3'- 4 " 17 ' - 6 " 34 ' - 1 0 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 34 ' - 1 1 " 17 ' - 6 " 10 " 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 16 ' - 1 1 " 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"18'-5"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 18'-4 1/2"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 10 ' - 1 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 5.15 5.15 9.2 21.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 22.2 9.2 5.15 5.15 5.15 EDGE OF FLOOR ABOVE 7.3 20 ' - 6 " 6'-11" 32'-4 1/2" 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 3 A6.01 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 1 A6.06 ARENA [NIC] R 14' - 9" R 14' - 9" 2'-0" 1'-0" G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " A3.01 1 AR E N A G R I D L I N E , VE R I F Y I N F I E L D ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM 601 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5'-3" PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 2'-0" 2'-0" 127.46'127.46' 127.92' 129.11' 131.31' 132.96' 132.96' 132.96' 134.46' 125.96' 135.85' 125.45' 5.8 5.8 5.15 5.15 5.15 5.15 9.6 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 WA1 WA4 WA4 WA1 WA1 WB1 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2'-10" 4'- 0 " 4'-0" 2'- 0 " 4'- 0 " 2'- 2 " 7" PROP E R T Y LINE 20 19 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3"7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2"3'-2"2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2"5'-0" 121'-3" 4" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" WA2 WA4 WA4 WA3 WA2 WA1 1'-2 15/16" 1'-5" 5.12 ARENA GRID LINE, VERIFY IN FIELD 22.12 22.12 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 4 0 : 2 5 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 6 A2.06 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 61 Key Value Keynote Text 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS. 5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 7.3 ELASTOMERIC COATING OVER ROOM BELOW - SEE SPECIFICATION 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.6 ACCESSIBLE STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 3/A5.01 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. 22.12 PIPES - REFER TO 4/7.01, 5/7.02, 6/7.01, 7/7.02 FOR PIPE PROTECTION DETAILS N REFERENCE TRUE NORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set DN DN RA M P U P 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 6.1 1 % RA M P D N 5.5 6 % 6" 1 A3.05 1 A3.07 A3.03 1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 9 1 16 1 7A-33 1- 9 1- 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 A3.06 11"17'-6"23'-9"17'-6" OPEN TO BELOW A4.02 2ELEVATOR & STAIR #1 STAIR #2 A4.06 7 6B- 5 1 4 1 1 6 7B-11 FEC FEC FEC UP DN UP DN UPDN 137.42' 8 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 7 2 ' - 0 " 19 ' - 5 " 3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"3@ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3'-6" 4'-8"3 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"3 @ 9'-0" = 27'-0"9 @ 8'-6" = 25'-6"1'-10" 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 16 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 1 4 4 ' - 0 " 3'- 4 1 / 2 " 10 ' - 1 0 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 10 ' - 1 1 " 6'- 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 6'- 0 " 2'-0" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"18'-5" 6'-0"11'-9"6'-0"6'-0"11'-9"6'-0" 9 @ 9 ' - 0 " = 8 1 ' - 0 " A3 . 0 2 1 A3 . 0 4 1 3'-7 1/2"6 @ 9'-0" = 54'-0" 4'-4 1/2"17'-0" 9.2 21.2 22.2 21.2 9.2 9.2 A3.01 1 1'-0" 3'-4 1/2"31 ' - 9 " 1 A6.01 2 A6.01 1 A6.02 2 A6.02 3 A6.02 1 A6.03 3 A6.01 3 A6.03 1 A6.04 2 A6.04 3 A6.04 1 A6.05 2 A6.05 3 A6.05 3 A6.06 2 A6.06 1 A6.06 ARENA [NIC] R 14' - 9"R 14' - 9" 2'-0" 1'-0" 4'- 6 " SNOW PILING AREA 228 SQ. FT. SNOW PILING AREA 133 SQ. FT G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1 A3.08 T A4 21 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 19 ' - 9 " 18 ' - 0 " 9'- 0 " 2'- 9 1 / 2 " 15 ' - 2 1 / 2 " 18 ' - 0 " 4'- 6 " 22 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 9 " 21 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 6 " 21 0 ' - 0 " AR E N A G R I D L I N E ARENA GRID LINE CANOPY ROOF ABOVE CANOPY ROOF ABOVE 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 9.2 137.96' 137.96' 135.46' 143.46' 143.46' 143.46' 141.81' 139.61' 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 9.10 5.14 A5.01 7 9.10 9.10 WA1 WA4 WA1 WA1 WA4 9.2 ELEV. #2 ELEV. #1 AS S U M E D P R O P E R T Y L I N E 2'-10" 22.2 A.D. R 14' - 8 1/2" O.D. +2" A.D. O.D. +2" G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 21'-0"8'-3"27'-1 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2" 2'-10"16'-11 1/2"10'-2 1/2" 5'-0" 121'-3" 3'-7 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 5'-8 1/2" 17 ' - 6 " WA3 WA2 WA1 WA2 WA3 WA1 1'-0 1/2"2" 1'-0" SNOW PILING AREA 447 SQ. FT 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED: A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS. D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES. 2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS. 3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS. 4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE. 5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD. 6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND: (REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS) GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURB SEE PARKING BOLLARD, SEE DETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02 CL E A R L E N G T H O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POST SEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM: 4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.01 5/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALL WD3 12" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD4 12" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM 12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB2 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM TYPE NON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4) WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA2 4" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM WA3 6" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WA4 WA5 6" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XX 1/8" = 1'-0" PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 71 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 4/ 4 / 2 0 2 5 4 : 4 1 : 0 2 P M PARKING PLAN - LEVEL 7 A2.07 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP Key Value Keynote Text 5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAIL A7.06 5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. 9.2 PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.02 9.10 STANDARD STALL STRIPING - REFER TO DETAIL 1/A5.01 21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 22.2 EMERGENCY FLOOR DRAIN, REFER TO PLUMBING DWGS. NREFERENCE TRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 2 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 3 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 6"1.NO VERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED:A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS.B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS .C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS.D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES.2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS.3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS.4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE .5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD.6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS.GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPEGRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPESTRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND:(REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS)GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATIONSTEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURBSEEPARKING BOLLARD OR HIGH IMPACT BOLLARD, SEE ORDETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEEDIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02CLEAR LENGTH OF PARKING SPACECLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACEDELINEATOR POSTSEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEEFLOOR ELEVATION DATUM:4200.00'=00.00'6/A5.015/A7.028/A5.01ADARESERVEDIDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPEPAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS1/A9.13 10/A7.0221'-0"8'-0"19'-9"18'-0"9'-0"2'-9 1/2"15'-2 1/2"18'-0"4'-6"22'-6"27'-9"21'-0"22'-6"21'-0"35'-4 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2"11'-7 1/2"8'-5 1/2" 3'-2"30'-0"5'-0"121'-3"210'-0"ARENA GRID LINE,VERIFY IN FIELDARENA GRID LINE,VERIFY IN FIELD 2%2%2%2%2%2%PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 137.96'137.96'139.61'141.81'158.04'158.04'143.46'21.221.2 FECFEC ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE2'-10"ARENA (NIC)G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 CC1CC1CC1A7.019A7.019OPEN TO BELOW Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02 1/8" = 1'-0"1 CANOPIES ROOF PLAN NREFERENCE TRUENORTH SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTES3D LEVEL PLANPLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 2:14:30 PM CANOPIES ROOFPLANA2.0812 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EPNO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit SetCANOPY ABOVECANOPY BEAM ABOVE CANOPY COLUMNS SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 WALTER P. MOORE ARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 6/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 5 1 1 : 5 2 : 1 7 P M AXONOMETRICS A1.04 Phase 2 Permit Set 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set ROOF CANOPIES 3D VIEW LOOKING EAST ROOF CANOPIES 3D VIEW LOOKING SOUTH ROOF CANOPIES 3D VIEW LOOKING FROM ELEVATOR LOBBY ROOF CANOPIES 3D VIEW LOOKING AT ELEVATOR LOBBY 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL74'-0"LEVEL 1 74'-0"LEVEL 185'-11"LEVEL 2 85'-11"LEVEL 296'-5"LEVEL 3 96'-5"LEVEL 3106'-11"LEVEL 4 106'-11"LEVEL 4117'-5"LEVEL 5 117'-5"LEVEL 5127'-11"LEVEL 6 127'-11"LEVEL 6138'-5"LEVEL 7 138'-5"LEVEL 7G.1G.2G.5G.5.9G.7G.9 10'-10"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-11"30'-7 1/2"1A6.042A6.04 1A6.06G.6G.7.9G.8 G.4G.7.5A4149'-3"LOWER ROOF 149'-3"LOWER ROOFLOADING DOCK AREA 5.14VERIFY IN FIELD38'-5"1'-5"3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6" 5'-0"8 1/2" TYP. 1" TYP.GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"10'-2 1/2"22'-1 1/2"74'-7 1/2"5.145.14 5.15 5.155.55.5 5.145.195.19 GUARD BOOTH 3.143.14 5.12 5.12 LOADING DOCK AREA 3.14STORAGE (NIC)ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE2'-10"ARENA GRIDLINE VERIFY IN FIELD LOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREAARENA (NIC)ARENA (NIC)ARENA (NIC)ROOF DECKROOF DECKROOF DECK8.1STAIR #1 ENTRY/EXIT 20'-5"5.3 5.145.17 5.1721.2 5.16 5.20 100 S 105'-10 1/2"30'-7 1/2"11'-11"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-10"105'-10 1/2"74'-7 1/2"5.20 5.165.215.17G.5.2G.8.2G.8.6GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"WA1 5'-0"OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENVERIFY IN FIELD7'-11 1/4"8.5 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:10:36 PM BUILDINGELEVATIONSA3.0212 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.21 1 1/2" DOVETAIL ROOF DECK - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.8.1 METAL ROLL DOWN GATE, SEE DETAILS A5.11.8.5 WOVEN WIRE FENCE DOOR - REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.10.21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set5 07/??/2025 Bulletin #55 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 74'-0"LEVEL 185'-11"LEVEL 296'-5"LEVEL 3106'-11"LEVEL 4117'-5"LEVEL 5127'-11"LEVEL 6138'-5"LEVEL 7159'-5"HIGH ROOF G.P G.DG.EG.FG.GG.MG.NG.O 10'-2"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-11"30'-7 1/2"79'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1.591'-5"LEVEL 2.5101'-11"LEVEL 3.5112'-5"LEVEL 4.5122'-11"LEVEL 5.5133'-5"LEVEL 6.5143'-11"LEVEL 7.5 15'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"116'-0 1/2"1A6.053A6.05 G.HG.IG.JG.KG.L G.CG.Q T149'-3"LOWER ROOF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE5.3 10'-2"74'-7 1/2"20'-5"5'-0"2'-5" 3'-6"5'-0"2'-5" 3'-1"5'-0"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-1"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"3'-6"TYP.1"TYP.8 1/2"GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"5'-0" 4'-3"5.12 5.3 5.14 5.145.14 5.25.55.5 5.5 5.15 5.1421.25.5 GUARD BOOTH5.195.19 5.16 3.221.29.1 5.19 LOADING DOCK AREAELECTRICAL ROOM (NIC)ICE ROOM (NIC)LOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREA LOADING DOCK ENTRANCE RAMP TO LEVEL B13.143.14 3.1 3.14PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRY/EXIT AT LEVEL 17.53.1 5.115.17 5.175.20 5.125.12 105'-10 1/2"STAIR #2FIRE PUMP ROOM5.19 7.55.12 G.C.4GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"5.16 5.155.14WB1WA2WA4WC1 WA1WB14.1 3'-8 3/4" 5'-0" 4'-3"OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN13'-7"9A4.18 WC1WC1WA4 11WB1WB1 WC1TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:10:40 PM BUILDINGELEVATIONSA3.0312 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"EAST ELEVATION1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.1 CONCRETE COLUMN - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.4.1 C.M.U. WALL5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TOSTRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.11 CANE DETECTION RAILING, REFER TO DETAIL 11/A4.135.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.7.5 EIFS SYSTEM WITH MOISTURE DRAINAGE.9.1 PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTERING SYSTEM WITH SMOOTH FINISH OVER METAL STUD FRAMING WALL, TYP.21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #15 07/??/2025 Bulletin #55 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 85'-11"LEVEL 2159'-5"HIGH ROOF G.1 G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.915'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"79'-5 1/2"36'-7"79'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1.591'-5"LEVEL 2.5101'-11"LEVEL 3.5112'-5"LEVEL 4.5122'-11"LEVEL 5.5133'-5"LEVEL 6.5143'-11"LEVEL 7.5 1A6.012A6.013A6.01 1A6.06 G.6 G.7.9G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 A4149'-3"LOWER ROOF 5.14 VERIFY IN FIELD38'-8"5'-0"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"5'-0" 2'-0" 3'-6"3'-6"3'-11 1/2"11'-6 1/2"GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"80'-1 1/2"20'-5"VERIFY IN FIELD26'-4"5.145.14 5.5 5.5 5.3 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE7.5 5.193.14 3.15LOADING DOCK AREA 7.55.12 5.16 27'-0 1/2"2'-10"ASSUMED PROPERTY LINELOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREAROOF DECK LOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREA ROOF DECK ROOF DECK STORAGE (NIC)ARENA (NIC)ARENA (NIC)ARENA (NIC)ARENA GRID LINE VERIFY IN FIELD5.17 21.2 5.12N 400 W (NIC)(NIC)5.16 5.19STAIR #3 STAIR #15.153.14 5.16 5.215.15 5.16 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"10.10 WA1 WA2WB25'-0"OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN078.56A5.02 TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:10:46 PM BUILDINGELEVATIONSA3.0412 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.15 CONCRETE SHEAR WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.21 1 1/2" DOVETAIL ROOF DECK - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.7.5 EIFS SYSTEM WITH MOISTURE DRAINAGE.8.5 WOVEN WIRE FENCE DOOR - REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.10.10.10 BUILDING ADDRESS21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set5 07/??/2025 Bulletin #55 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL74'-0"LEVEL 1 74'-0"LEVEL 185'-11"LEVEL 2 85'-11"LEVEL 296'-5"LEVEL 3 96'-5"LEVEL 3106'-11"LEVEL 4 106'-11"LEVEL 4117'-5"LEVEL 5 117'-5"LEVEL 5127'-11"LEVEL 6 127'-11"LEVEL 6138'-5"LEVEL 7 138'-5"LEVEL 7G.1 G.2 G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.910'-10"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-11"30'-7 1/2"105'-10 1/2"LEVEL 1LEVEL 2LEVEL 3LEVEL 4LEVEL 5LEVEL 5ALEVEL 5BLEVEL 6LEVEL 7143'-11"LEVEL 7.5 STORAGEG.6 G.7.9G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 A4149'-3"LOWER ROOF 149'-3"LOWER ROOF5.14 5.2 5.3GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"74'-7 1/2"VERIFY IN FIELD37'-3 1/2"VERIFY IN FIELD7'-9"15'-8 1/2"5.155.5 5.145.5 5.15 5.145.15CC1FA13.2 3.15 5.16LOADING DOCK AREAFC1FC1 5.12 LOADING DOCK AREALOADING DOCK AREA WA1 CONCOURSE(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE2'-10"ARENA GRID LINE VERIFY IN FIELD (NIC)LOGE CLUB(NIC)TRUCKPARKINGAREAN 400 W LOADING DOCK RAMP ELEVATOR#35.19 (NIC)(NIC)ROOF DECKROOF DECK LOADING DOCK AREA 5.16 5.205.20 5.12 8.15.175.175.215.16 5.143.115.20 5.17 5.3STAIR #2G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"WA5 OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN WC15.191TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:10:50 PM BUILDING SECTIONSA3.0512 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"SECTION - NORTH1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.11 CONCRETE CURB/ISLAND 6" HIGH, REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.013.15 CONCRETE SHEAR WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TOSTRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.21 1 1/2" DOVETAIL ROOF DECK - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.8.1 METAL ROLL DOWN GATE, SEE DETAILS A5.11.PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL159'-5"HIGH ROOFG.2G.5G.5.9G.7G.9 15'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"116'-0 1/2"79'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1.591'-5"LEVEL 2.5101'-11"LEVEL 3.5112'-5"LEVEL 4.5122'-11"LEVEL 5.5133'-5"LEVEL 6.5143'-11"LEVEL 7.5LOBBY RAMP VESTIBULELOBBYBOH G.6G.7.9G.8 G.3G.4G.7.5A4 GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"80'-1 1/2"11'-6 1/2" 3'-11 1/2"VERIFY IN FIELD37'-6 1/2"VERIFY IN FIELD14'-7 1/2"21'-4 1/2"5.3PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 5.55.55.15 21.25.15 5.8 5.1521.25.25.3 5.8 5.15.11 LOADING DOCK AREAFA1 CC1 FB13.23.143.14 LOADING DOCK AREAFC1CC1ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE2'-10"ARENA GRIDLINE VERIFY IN FIELDCONCOURSELOGE CLUB STORAGE 5.14 5.19 5.165.221.2 5.20 100 S5.165.145.165.17 5.125.165.17(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)(NIC)G.5.2G.8.2G.8.6(NIC)(NIC)VERIFY IN FIELD25'-8 3/4"STAIR #1 5.1613'-1 1/4"VERIFY IN FIELD27'-5 1/4"VERIFY IN FIELD12'-10"A4.188LEVEL 1100'-0"LEVEL 7209'-3 1/4"LEVEL 6195'-3 1/4"LEVEL 5B183'-1 1/2"LEVEL 5A170'-4 3/4"LEVEL 5158'-9 3/4"LEVEL 5A146'-9 3/4"LEVEL 3133'-1 3/4"LEVEL 2118'-8 3/4"MEZZANINE LEVEL112'-5 3/4"ROOF LEVEL237'-2"GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"WA1FD1FD1WA4 WA4 OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN 5.118.5A4.191 5.19WC1 WC1WA4WC11 5.216A5.02TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:10:58 PM BUILDING SECTIONSA3.0612 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"SECTION - SOUTH1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.1 MTL STAIRS WITH CONCRETE FILLED PAN TREADS AND LANDINGS AND WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. (UNDER DEFERREDSUBMITTAL)5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TOSTRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.11 CANE DETECTION RAILING, REFER TO DETAIL 11/A4.135.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.21 1 1/2" DOVETAIL ROOF DECK - SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.8.5 WOVEN WIRE FENCE DOOR - REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.10.21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #12 05/19/2025 Bulletin #22 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 74'-0"LEVEL 185'-11"LEVEL 296'-5"LEVEL 3106'-11"LEVEL 4117'-5"LEVEL 5127'-11"LEVEL 6138'-5"LEVEL 7159'-5"HIGH ROOF 159'-5"HIGH ROOFG.P G.DG.EG.FG.GG.MG.NG.O 5'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-11"30'-7 1/2"95'-0 1/2"79'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1.591'-5"LEVEL 2.5101'-11"LEVEL 3.5112'-5"LEVEL 4.5122'-11"LEVEL 5.5133'-5"LEVEL 6.5143'-11"LEVEL 7.5 143'-11"LEVEL 7.55'-3 1/2"10'-2 1/2"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"116'-0 1/2"64'-5"G.HG.IG.JG.KG.L T 149'-3"LOWER ROOF5.55.5 5.14 5.1421.2GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"74'-7 1/2"20'-8 1/2"5.5 5.85.35.15 5.155.3 5.8 5.55.5 5.15 5.145.145.125.145.195.3 21.23.14 5.16 FB1 21.2 3.113.2LOADING DOCK AREACC1 5.12WA15.17 5.20 3.145.175.17GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2"WA1 FA1LOADING DOCK AREAEGRESS STAIR #3 STAIR #1OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN LOADING DOCK AREA01 5.8FC15'-0 3/4"3'-3 1/2"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"10'-6 3/4"TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:11:04 PM BUILDING SECTIONSA3.0712 / 06 / 202461 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE TD/DASB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"SECTION - EAST RAMP1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.11 CONCRETE CURB/ISLAND 6" HIGH, REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.013.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL 43'-4 1/2"LEVEL74'-0"LEVEL 185'-11"LEVEL 296'-5"LEVEL 3106'-11"LEVEL 4117'-5"LEVEL 5127'-11"LEVEL 6138'-5"LEVEL 7 159'-5"HIGH ROOF1A4.07 G.PG.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O 79'-11 1/2"LEVEL 1.591'-5"LEVEL 2.5101'-11"LEVEL 3.5112'-5"LEVEL 4.5122'-11"LEVEL 5.5133'-5"LEVEL 6.5143'-11"LEVEL 7.53A4.09G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.QT149'-3"LOWER ROOF UTILITY ROOM104 5.55.14 5.215'-8"19'-6"GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2" 105'-10 1/2"15'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"116'-0 1/2"74'-7 1/2"5.14 5.125.1 5.2 5.5 5.521.221.25.8 5.14 21.25.8 5.3FB15.12GUARD BOOTH 5.5 5.143.2 3.15 3.145.163.15 LOADING DOCK AREA WA1 FC1FC121.25.155'-4"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"11'-5 1/2"36'-7"STAIR #3STAIR #15.17 3.145.16 5.165.20ELEVATOR #3 5.193.147.5 5.12GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2" GRADE PLANE = 63'-9 1/2" 81'-1"10.10WB2WA5WA5WA1OPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPENOPEN9A4.18FC1 A5.026 10"TYPE TWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WD1 12" CMU WALL (PRECISION CMU, W/OUT FINISH)WD2 8" CMU PARTITION WALLWD312" CMU WALL W/ 1/2" AIR GAP, MTL. FURRING AND STUCCOWD412" CMU WALL W/ 3 1/4" THICK EIFS SYSTEM12" CMU WALL W/ DAMP PROOFING IN ONE SIDEWD5TYPETWO HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WC1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWC26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPEONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WB1 8" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWB26" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMTYPENON-RATED WALL (PER IBC TABLE 720.1(2) ITEM 15-1.4)WA1 4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EIFS SYSTEMWA24" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEMWA36" METAL STUD W/EIFS SYSTEM4" METAL STUD SINGLE FACE W/EXTERIOR SHEATHINGWA4WA56" METAL STUD W/EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALL TAG KEY (PARTITION TYPE) SEE SHEET A1.05 FOR DETAILSX-XXTYPEELEVATED CONCRETE SLABCD15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPETAPERED INSULATION ON METAL DECKCC15" REINFORCED CONCRETE ROOFTYPECB13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGSUSPENDED CEILING W/ INSULATION UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABSUSPENDED CEILING UNDER METAL DECK CONCRETE SLABTYPECA13 1/2" CONC. ROOF OVER MTL. DECK W/ MTL. STUD AND EXT. SHEATHINGCEILING TYPESFLOOR TYPESTYPE CONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFD13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECK W/MTL. STUD, THERMAL INSULATION AND PAINTED DENSGLASS SOFFITTYPECONCRETE METAL DECK ELEVATED SLABFC13 1/2" CONCRETE FLOOR OVER METAL DECKTYPEELEVATED SLABFB15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOORTYPESLAB ON GRADE REPAIRFA15" REINFORCED CONCRETE FLOOR SHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBERDATEIRO / SEALIN ASSOCIATION WITH :ISSUECopyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PROJECT TEAMPROJECT NAMEARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEERWALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940M09-21011-00KEYNOTESWALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERINGHORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGEROWNER7/16/2025 1:11:11 PM BUILDING SECTIONSA3.0801/30/2561 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101 DELTA CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE DA/YCSB61 S 400 W.SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101EP 1/8" = 1'-0"SECTION - WEST RAMP1 Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.2 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.14 CONCRETE WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.3.15 CONCRETE SHEAR WALL - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.1 MTL STAIRS WITH CONCRETE FILLED PAN TREADS AND LANDINGS AND WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. (UNDER DEFERREDSUBMITTAL)5.2 5" I.D. VEHICLE BARRIER PIPE WITH STEEL COATING SYSTEM, CONCRETE FILLED - REFER TO 2/A7.02, 5/A7.02, 8/A7.02 - REFER TOSTRUCTURAL DWGS.5.3 GUARDRAIL - REFER TO SHEET A4.11(UNDER DEFERRED SUBMITTAL)5.5 GALVANIZED BARRIER CABLES - REFER TO DETAILS ON SHEET A7.065.8 4" I.D. BOLLARD, HOLLOW PIPE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.12 HSS SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.16 STEEL BEAM - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.17 COMPOSITE DECK - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.19 MTL STUD WALL FRAMING SYSTEM.5.20 TRUSSES SYSTEM REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.7.5 EIFS SYSTEM WITH MOISTURE DRAINAGE.10.10 BUILDING ADDRESS21.2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET - REFER TO DETAIL 6/A7.02, 7/7.02PROJECT DATUM: ELEV. 4200 = ELEV. 0 NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set3 05/30/2025 Bulletin #33 Materials specifications The materials listed below in this Exhibit B are approved for the façade and the loading dock area and Master Developer may select among them without such selection being considered to be a “modification” which would require any reconsideration or re-approval by the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 9 of the MDA SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECT ELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEER STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKS CIVIL & LANDSCAPE WALTER P. MOORE BNA CONSULTING VBFA HALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 IN ASSOCIATION WITH : CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 7/ 1 8 / 2 0 2 5 3 : 4 4 : 1 4 P M MATERIAL BOARD A3.01.1 15/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 DE L T A C E N T E R PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E MS SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% Design Development 12/06/2024 100% Design Development 02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 5 07/??/2025 Bulletin #5 3. 2. 1. 6. 10. 12. 5. 4. 11. 4.NATURAL GRAY MEDIUM BROOM FINISH CONCRETE 5. NATURAL GRAY CAST IN PLACE FORMED SMOOTH CONCRETE 13. SALIX PURPUREA 'NANA' 9.8. 7. 1.SATIN FINISH NON-REFLETIVE PERFORATED ALUMINUM PANEL WITH 40% TO 60% OPENESS RATIO 3.SATIN FINISH NON-REFLETIVE PERFORATED ALUMINUM PANEL WITH 20% TO 30% OPENESS RATIO 2.POWDER COATED GRAY WOVEN WIRE MESH WITH 1 1/2" X 1 1/2" OPENING 6. NON-REFLECTIVE GALVANIZED METAL CANOPY DECK OVER HIGH PERFORMANCE PAINTED GRAY STEEL COLUMNS & BEAMS 8. RHUS AROMATICA 'GROW-LOW' 10. TINY WINE NINEBARK 9. CALAMAGROTIS ACUTIFLORA 7. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 11. PRUNUS CISTENA 12. JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 13. 5 3. 1. 7. 8.9.105. 13 2. 1112 Vitraplate Perforated Aluminum Panels Addie McNamara 1420 500 W Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Dear Addie, Here are some samples of perforated metal for consideration and visioning of the Delta Center Parking Structure project. I’ve been working with Saeed at Walter P Moore and he requested that I send a variety of samples to you for review. I represent Valmont, who specializes in custom metal garage screen solutions. You will also be receiving a set of samples from Valmont direct which include perforated samples in the 25-40% range as well as some wire mesh solutions for the portion of the project which requires a more open design. I have also included some data sheets on a variety of patterns which are our most economical to produce due to the efficiency of the patterns when it comes to fabrication. I understand budget is in play here so thought it might be helpful to provide this information as well. We have many solutions beyond the samples which have been provided but expect this to be a good starting point as you continue to work through material types, patterns, profiles, etc. to determine the best solution for your project. We look forward to continuing to support you and the project team as this continues to progress. Thanks! Sincerely, Jamie Benson Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7889 09/19 Applications: Sun Screens, Cladding, Facades, Ceiling Tiles Attachment Methods: The Atmosphere System from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line or Screw Fastened (Use isolators LF11.0 from the Architectural Facades product line) Extras Notes: Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on .12in (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Powder Coated or Anodized 30% Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 1.1674 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Apollo 300 or R03230 Architectural Facades Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Applications: Facades, Decorative Panels, Ceiling Tiles, Cladding Attachment Methods: The Atmosphere System from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line or Screw Fastened (Use isolators LF11.0 from the Architectural Facades product line.) Extras Notes: Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on .12in (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Powder Coated or Anodized 40% Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 1.0036 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Eclipse 600 or R06440 Architectural Facades Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7894 09/19 Applications: Decorative Panels, Cladding, Facades, Ceiling Tiles Attachment Methods: Screw Fastened or Tensile Cable Extras Notes: Folding of sides recommended for rigidity and to maintain flatness. Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on 0.12 (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Anodized, Powder Coated 49% Stock / Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 0.8397 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Titan 120 or R12749 Architectural Facades * Typical Architectural Facade Installation Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7905 09/19 Applications: Facades, Parking Garage Screens, Cladding Attachment Methods: The Atmosphere System from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line or Screw Fastened (Use isolators LF11.0 from the Architectural Facades product line.) Extras Notes: Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on .12in (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Powder Coated or Anodized 51% Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 0.8193 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Titan 190 or R19151 Architectural Facades Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7906 09/19 Applications: Parking Garage Screens, Cladding, Facades Attachment Methods: The Atmosphere System from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line or Screw Fastened (Use isolators LF11.0 from the Architectural Facades product line.) Extras Notes: Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on .12in (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Powder Coated or Anodized 62% Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 0.6349 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Clarity 800 or R07962 Architectural Facades Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7892 09/19 Applications: Facades, Decorative Panels, Ceiling Tiles, Cladding Attachment Methods: The Atmosphere System from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line or Screw Fastened (Use isolators LF11.0 from the Architectural Facades product line.) Extras Notes: Other materials and thickness can be manufactured upon request. * OA and Weight calculations are based on .12in (3.0mm) aluminum. Material Finish Open Area* Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight* Thickness Aluminum Powder Coated or Anodized 40% Custom Made 60” 16’ 4” 1.0036 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Eclipse 600 or R06440 Architectural Facades Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7894 09/19 Applications: Parking Garage Screens, Facades, Decorative Panels Attachment Methods: Screw Fastened or Tensile Cable Extras Notes: Folding of sides is recommended for rigidity and to maintain flatness. Material Finish Open Area Stock Status Type Form Max. Width Max. Length Weight Thickness Aluminum Anodized, Powder Coated 73% Custom Made Rigid Sheet 48” 16’ 4” 0.4505 lb/ft² 0.125” Profile Sheer 2800 Architectural Facades * Typical Architectural Facade Installation Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7904 09/19 Architectural Facades Slotted Mesh Architectural Details Technical Data Sheet No: LD-102.2 Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. MSC4196 09/19 Please fill in the following information for your screen. Reference: Aperture 'A' Aperture 'B' Wire Dia. 'A' Wire Dia. 'B' Long Aperture 'B' // to: in in in in Sheet Length: Sheet Width: Material (Please Circle) in in Length / Width Customer Name: Signed for Approval: Date: Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Applications: Building Facades, Roller Curtains Attachment Methods: Fastening systems from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line including; Angle, Cap, Flat Bar, L5 Series of Tension fastening systems or L7 Curtain Screw Series. See website for more details. Extras Notes: Dimensions are nominal Material Finish Open Area Type Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight Wire Dia Aperture Form S/S T316, T304 Mill 19% Flexible Custom Made 118” As per Application 1.761 lb/ft² S/S 0.11” x 0.039” (2.8/1.0 Ribbon) 0.224” x 0.524” Roll Profile Transit F281 Architectural Facades * Typical Architectural Facade Installation Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7885 09/19 Applications: Building Facades, Curtains, Ceilings Attachment Methods: Fastening systems from the Valmont® Structures Architectural Facades product line including; Angle, Cap, Flat Bar, L5 Series of Tension fastening systems or L7 Curtain Screw Series. See website for more details. Extras Notes: Dimensions are nominal Material Finish Open Area Type Stock Status Max. Width Max. Length Weight Wire Dia Aperture Form S/S T316, T304, Galv, Brass Mill 56% Flexible Custom Made 197” As per Application 0.94 lb/ft² S/S 18 SWG 0.285” x 0.285” Roll Profile Transit 210 Architectural Facades * Typical Architectural Facade Installation Contact your local Sales Representative today at: 941.402.3554 • facades@valmont.com valmontstructures.com/facades Copyright © 2019 Valmont® Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. Valmont® Structures has a policy of continuous product improvement and development. As a result, certain changes in standard equipment, options, price, etc., may have occurred after the publication of this document. Some drawings and specifications may not be identical to current production. Valmont Structures reserves the right to change product design and specifications at any time without incurring obligations. SPC7881 09/19 Commercial Collection lnterpon Futura D2525 El Stocked Product m Made to Order Product z Prefinished 3mm(1/8”) solid aluminum plate panels. z Are highly durable and impact resistant. z Coil finishing avoids the runs and streaks that result from post-finishing after perforating. z Perforating after coil finishing ensures that factory-applied protective film keeps the finish intact. Vitraplate perforated aluminum panels Fairview Architectural manufactures high-quality perforated aluminum plate panels that offer superior durability and can be rolled, curved and fabricated to suit a range of design requirements. Our perforated panels can be used for a wide variety of applications such as for exterior façades, decorative panels, car park screens, balustrade infills, sports stadiums and much more. Key Benefits Colors and Finishes Specifications Quality Control Our aluminum panel products are prefinished in a coil- coated process with a flexible 70% PVDF Kynar paint coating system which offers a wide range of finish options such as solid, metallics, patterned finishes. Perforating after anodizing or coating is preferred in architectural use, because the purpose of the perforations is for aesthetic reasons, and the exposed cut edge of the aluminum enhances the perforations. With coil anodized or coil coated Vitraplate, the quality and integrity of the finish are not impacted in any way by perforating. Note: Fairview offers coil coating and coil anodizing over batch coating and batch anodizing as the finish is more consistent and of a higher quality Product Vitraplate 3mm(1/8”) Panel Sizes (width)Standard: 48”, 60”, 62” (1219mm, 1524mm, 1574mm) Panel Sizes (length)Standard: 122”, 146”, 196” (3099mm, 3708mm, 4980mm) Surface Coating PVDF 70 % Kynar Finishes Solid, Metallics, Woodgrains & Specialty Colors Finish Warranty Up to 30 years Vitraplate perforated panels are available in multiple aluminum alloys and are engineered per project depending on the sheet size and perforation pattern required as well as the finish. As a trusted manufacturer, Fairview Architectural has a robust third-party audited quality control process to ensure supply-chain integrity. For more information is required please contact the Fairview office on 860-242-2711 or email: helpdesk@fairview-na.com 75 Peters Road, Bloomfield, CT 06002, USA G.I G.A G.B G.C G.D G.E G.F G.G G.H G.2 G G.4 G.5 G.6 G.7 YIELD YIELD G.I G.A G.B G.C G.D G.E G.F G.G G.H G.2 G G.4 G.5 G.6 G.7 YIELD YIELD -- - - | 1 0 : 4 4 A M F R I D A Y 3 0 M A Y 2 0 2 5 | Q : \ ! 2 0 2 4 \ U T - 1 0 2 6 7 - 2 4 D E L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G \ P R O J E C T D A T A \ S H E E T _ F I L E S \ L 1 . 0 1 L A N D S C A P E . D W G 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 FT 20100 SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 10/31/2024 50% DD CIVIL ENGINEER HORROCKS4919 S 1500 W STE 300RIVERDALE, UT 84405 PHONE: 801.626.2300 DE L T A C E N T E R P A R K I N G ST R U C T U R E 30 1 W S O U T H T E M P L E SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 NO. DATE REVISION 12/06/2024 100% DD 02/14/2025 50% CD AM/MM GN LA Phase 2 Permit Set 04/07/2025 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 04/29/2025 Bulletin #1 2 05/13/2025 Bulletin #2 1 3 05/30/2025 Bulletin #3 1.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING QUANTITIES OF ALL MATERIALS FOR BIDDING ANDINSTALLATION PURPOSES. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST, THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE QUANTITIES TO BE USED. 2.TOPSOIL TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE FOLLOWING DEPTHS: 2.1.PER PLANTING DETAILS IN PLANTER BED AREAS. 2.2.4" DEPTH IN ALL TURF SOD AREAS 2.3.4" DEPTH IN ALL NEW SEED AREAS. 3.EDGING SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED BETWEEN ALL VARYING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SUCH AS TURF GRASS ANDBARK MULCH, BARK MULCH AND ROCK MULCH, TURF GRASS AND BROADCAST SEED, ETC. EXACT TYPE OFEDGING SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. IF NO EDGING IS INDICATED ON THE PLANS A 6" X 6" SLIP FORMED,SQUARE CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE USED. 4.LANDSCAPE ROCK AND BARK MULCH COLORS AND TYPES TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. SUBMIT SAMPLES FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ROCK SHALL BE A DARKER HUE WITH BROWNS, GREYS, BLUES, AND TANS.BARK MULCH SHALL BE MEDIUM TEXTURE, DARK BROWN IN COLOR. ROCK AND BARK MATERIAL SHALL BEIMPLEMENTED IN ALL PLANTER BED AREAS INDICATED ON THE PLANS AT THE FOLLOWING DEPTHS: 4.1.BARK MULCH - 4" DEPTH 4.2.1-2" DIAMETER FRACTURED STONE : 4" 4.3.STONE LARGER THAN 4" IN DIAMETER: DEPTH SHALL BE TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE SMALLEST STONE INTHE SPECIFIED GRADATION.4.4.PULL ROCK MIN. OF 3" AWAY FROM BASE OF ALL PERENNIALS AND SHRUBS AND MIN. 6" AWAY FROM ALLTREES. 5.INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND ORDINANCES. 6.ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW AND WITHOUT FLAWS OR DEFECTS OF THE QUALITY AND PERFORMANCESPECIFIED, AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SYSTEM. USE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED, NOSUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPEARCHITECT 7.BASE PLAN & LOCATION OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE. FIELD VERIFY ALL BASE &EXISTING ELEMENTS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION & PROVIDE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS. 8.ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24 HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING.FOLLOWING THE FIRST 24 HOURS ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED ROUTINELY TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY ANDPROMOTE ESTABLISHMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A WATERING SCHEDULEFOR THE OWNER'S REVIEW AND REFERENCE. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR ONE-YEAR AFTER DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VERIFICATION AND AVOIDANCE OF ALL UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES DURING THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION ELEMENTS. SHOULD ANY DAMAGE OCCURTO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR THE DAMAGE AT NO ADDITIONALCOST TO THE OWNER. 11.PRIOR TO STREET/PUBLIC TREE INSTALLATION, PRUNING (CROWN/ROOT) OR REMOVAL PLEASE HAVE THECONTRACTED LICENSED CERTIFIED ARBORIST SUBMIT A COMPLETE PUBLIC TREE PERMIT APPLICATION ATLEAST 10 DAYS PRIOR TO WORK BEING PERFORMED FOR THIS PROJECT TO INCLUDE CERTIFIED ARBORISTINFORMATION AND START AND COMPLETION DATES." 12.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AND TO AID IN INSTALLATION. SLIGHTDEVIATIONS (+/-1') FROM THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE ACCEPTABLE AS LONG AS THE OVERALL INTENT OF THEDESIGN IS MAINTAINED. 13.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REVIEW OF ALL OTHER PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS.UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, OR OTHER ELEMENTS MAY NOT BE DISPLAYED ON THESE SHEETS FOR GRAPHICCLARITY. 14.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER TRADES TO ENSURE CONFLICTSBETWEEN OTHER ELEMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THESE SHEETS ARE RESOLVED IN THE FIELD. 15.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY OF LANDSCAPE AREA PERPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1 COMPLETE PLANT LIST FROM SUPPLIER INCLUDING SIZES AND TYPES. 2 PHYSICAL SAMPLES OF LANDSCAPE ROCK AND RIP RAP (3 OPTIONS FOR EACH TYPEFOR APPROVAL). 3 SOIL DATA/COMPOSITION SHEET FOR IMPORTED TOPSOIL. 4 SOIL DATA/COMPOSITION SHEET FOR SOIL PREP. 5 PHOTOS AND PHYSICAL SAMPLES OF LANDSCAPE BOULDERS. 6 CONCRETE MOWCURB MIX AND REINFORCING DATA. 7 CONTRACTOR REQUIRED MAINTENANCE PLAN. 8 WARRANTY DATA 9 STAMPED AND COLORED CONCRETE AND PAVER PHYSICAL MOCK-UPS FOR APPROVALSHOWING COLOR AND PATTERN. MIN 5' X 5' SIZE. 10 PHYSICAL SAMPLES OF BARK MULCH (3 OPTIONS FOR EACH TYPE FOR APPROVAL). SEE SHEET L1.03 SEE SHEET L1.02 SEE SHEET L1.04 APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WORK LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.01 ZS ZS/MH SEE SHEET L1.05 SYMBOL CODE DESCRIPTION QTY L1.01 L1.02 L1.03 L1.04 L1.05FURNISH AND INSTALL A 4" DEPTHOF MEDIUM TEXTURE DARKBROWN MULCH (NO WEEDBARRIER) PER DETAILS. 6,565 SF 1,533 SF 2,190 SF 1,285 SF 1,558 SF FURNISH AND INSTALL A 4" DEPTHOF DECORATIVE ROCK (NO WEEDBARRIER) PER DETAILS. 1,642 SF 112 SF 694 SF 836 SF RESTORED RAISED PLANTERAREAEXACT LIMITS MAY VARYDEPENDING ON FINISHED WALLTHICKNESSES AND PIER/FOOTINGLOCATIONS FURNISH AND INSTALL A MINIMUMOF 12" OF APPROVED SOIL PREPTO 4" BELOW TOP OF WALL. SOILMATERIAL TO BOTTOM OF SOILPREP SHALL BE EQUAL ORBETTER THAN EXISTING MATERIALCOMPOSITION. 4,423 SF 4,423 SF FURNISH AND INSTALL 3-5'DIAMETER DECORATIVELANDSCAPE BOULDERS PERDETAILS 29 9 6 6 8 6" X 6" CONCRETE MOWCURB PERDETAILS FURNISH AND INSTALL A 6" THICKCONCRETE PAD FOR BENCH PERDETAILS 105 SF 105 SF FURNISH AND INSTALL 6' FORMSAND SURFACES RATIO BENCHWITH BACK OR APPROVED EQUALPER DETIALS 3 3 FURNISH AND INSTALL TREE WELLBACKFILL MATERIAL PER DETAILS.REPALCE TREE WELL ORPROTECT IN PLACE WHERENOTED. 677 SF 387 SF 290 SF 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE EXISTING 2" CALIPERTREES TO BE REMOVEDAND TRANSPLANTED BYCITY. CONTACT FORESTRYDEPARTMENT WHENREADY FOR REMOVAL. SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT CAL QTY L1.01 L1.02 L1.03 L1.04 L1.05 TREES CERCIS CANADENSIS `LAVENDER TWIST`LAVENDER TWIST REDBUD 10 GAL. POT 11 3 8 GINKGO BILOBA 'PRINCETON SENTRY'PRINCETON SENTRY MAIDENHAIR TREE B & B 2" 6 4 2 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SHADEMASTER`TMSHADEMASTER LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 8 4 4 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SHADEMASTER'SHADEMASTER HONEY LOCUST 3" CAL B&B 5 2 3 PICEA ABIES 'CUPRESSINA'CUPRESSINA NORWAY SPRUCE 6-7` HT. B&B 3 3 PINUS NIGRA 'OREGON GREEN'OREGON GREEN AUSTRIAN PINE 6-7` HT. B&B 2 2 ULMUS PARVIFOLIALACEBARK ELM 3" CAL B&B 6 1 3 2 ZELKOVA SERRATA 'GREEN VASE'GREEN VASE JAPANESE ZELKOVA 3" CAL B&B 5 2 3 SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY L1.01 L1.02 L1.03 L1.04 L1.05 SHRUBS ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSIKINNIKINNICK 1 GAL 31 5 11 9 6 BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'MARIA'SUNJOY GOLD PILLAR BARBERRY 5 GAL 3 3 JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'BLUE CHIP'BLUE CHIP JUNIPER 5 GAL 25 5 5 15 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `SMPOTW`TINY WINE® NINEBARK 5 GAL 30 7 13 4 6 PRUNUS X CISTENAPURPLE LEAF SAND CHERRY 5 GAL 23 15 8 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC 5 GAL.87 4 20 34 29 ROSA X `RADRAZZ`KNOCK OUT ROSE 5 GAL 14 3 5 6 SALIX PURPUREA `NANA`DWARF ARCTIC WILLOW 5 GAL 10 5 5 ANNUALS/PERENNIALS SALVIA NEMOROSA `MAY NIGHT`MAY NIGHT SAGE 1 GAL.9 9 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL 101 18 29 27 27 HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENSBLUE OAT GRASS 1 GAL 26 3 8 9 6 PLANT SCHEDULE 3 13% OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE 52% OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE 35% OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE 3 3 LANDSCAPE LIVE COVERAGE CALCULATIONS 359 TOTAL SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ~12 SF PER PLANT = 4308 SF OF LIVECOVERAGE 46 TOTAL TREES ~400 SF PER TREE = 18,400 SF OF LIVECOVERAGE REDUCE TOTAL TREE COVERAGE BY 75%TO ACCOUNT FOR OVERLAP WITH SHRUBSAND COVERAGE OF NON PLANTER AREAS. TOTAL APPLICABLE LIVE COVER = 4600 SF 13,307 SF OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL PROVIDED LIVE COVER = 8,908 SF(67%) 13,307 SF OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL PROVIDED LIVE COVER (NOTCOUNTING REDUCED TREE COVERAGE) =4308 SF (32%) 3 LANDSCAPE ~4' WALL WILL BE PLACED BACK LIKE HOW IT WAS AND WILL HAVE IVY ON THE SIDEWALK SIDE. ALSO, TREES WILL BE ADDED PER REQUEST. OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3MH: 2 OW3 MH: 2 0.1 76.4 3.2 0.5 0.4 8.8 3.5 0.6 0.2 19.2 12.2 2.6 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 53.3 4.2 12.8 2.5 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.5 10.1 9.0 8.7 1.9 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 41.0 10.7 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 2.3 3.5 1.6 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 1.7 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 20.5 2.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.5 2.1 0.2 0.1 1.4 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 2.6 27.5 0.3 7.5 1.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.5 13.3 2.4 0.8 0.4 0.5 1.5 3.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 1.5 0.6 0.4 0.6 1.9 21.8 0.3 10.1 2.1 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 9.2 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.2 15.2 2.6 1.1 1.4 4.6 0.6 6.8 1.8 1.3 2.5 16.0 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.0 1.6 2.0 0.4 22.0 2.8 1.3 1.9 6.3 0.5 3.8 1.4 1.1 2.3 10.9 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.5 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.0 8.3 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.9 7.5 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.2 12.6 1.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.6 5.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.3 17.1 2.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.4 3.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.5 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.3 16.3 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 2.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.6 6.2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.2 11.1 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.9 8.1 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.9 7.6 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.2 12.4 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.4 5.8 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.2 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.5 8.8 102.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 3.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.8 17.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.6 3.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 8.3 97.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.1 2.6 1.7 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.1 4.7 28.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.6 1.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 2.4 21.4 0.4 3.1 0.9 0.6 1.1 3.3 11.3 97.8 9.3 1.7 0.7 0.9 1.6 3.4 0.4 2.3 3.9 1.3 0.7 0.8 1.9 8.3 120.9 0.4 18.1 3.1 1.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 3.6 0.5 95.7 8.8 2.4 1.2 0.7 0.5 0.8 1.9 4.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.7 3.9 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.7 7.2 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.5 1.2 2.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.5 8.1 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.8 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 3.3 5.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 5.1 108.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts Mounting Height33RA-40711-W40 Single RA-40711-W40 OW3 1.000 1339 19.5 643.5 2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/MinLEVEL_1 LANDING_Top Illuminance Fc 2.96 120.9 0.0 N.A.N.A. G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.1 G.2 G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9 G.6 G.7.9 G.8 G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.C G.B G.A G.Q E2.10 4 OW3 MOUNTING HEIGHT IS +24" LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 2 3   p .   m . PARKING SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRIC E1.02A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST AM AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/32" = 1'-0" PARKING SITE PLAN PHOTOMETRIC1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.1 G.2 G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.C G.B G.A G.Q 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1EH1-5 X2 1H1-5 K90E 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 K90E 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-5 K90E 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8WE 1EH1-5 X2 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-5 K90E 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 K90E 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1EH1-11 W2 1EH1-11 ±28' 1H1-3 (1RP-12) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-12) ±28' 1H1-3 (1RP-12) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-12) ±28' 1EH1-11 W2 1EH1-11 ±28' 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM 1EL1-1 BEP WP L2 L1 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 E2.10 1 E2.10 3 E2.10 2 1EH1-17 EM 1EH1-17 EM 1EH1-17 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1EH1-17 1EH1-17 1EH1-17 1EH1-17 1EH1-17 EM EM 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-9 1EH1-8 (1RP-9) ST1 1EH1-8 (1RP-9) ST1 1EH1-8 (1RP-9) ST1 L10 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8WE 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8WE 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8W 1H1-11 (1RP-10) K90 1H1-11 (1RP-10) D8WE 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 EM EM EM L10 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8WE EM 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8WEEM 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8WE EM 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W K90 EM 2 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W 1H1-5 (1RP-14) K90 1H1-7 (1RP-13) K90 1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W1H1-9 (1RP-11) D8W 1H1-3 (1RP-12) OW1 1H1-3 (1RP-12) ±28' 1H1-3 (1RP-12) OW1 1H1-3 (1RP-12) ±28' 4 4 1EH1-17 1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W 1H1-11 (1RP-22) D3WE 1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W 1H1-11 (1RP-22) D3WE 1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W 1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W1H1-11 (1RP-23) D3W 1EH1-17 1EH1-17 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOF STA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 26 / 0 6 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 4 7 : 4 6 p . m . LEVEL B1 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.01 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL B1 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATOR INSTALLER L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATOR INSTALLER L10 MOUNTING HEIGHT OF THE LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE COORDINATED ON SITE BY THE OWNER AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% DD 12/06/2024 100% DD 02/14/2025 50% CD 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 2 05/19/2025 Bulletin #2 4 06/25/2025 Bulletin #4 SCALE = 3/32" = 1'-0" LEVEL B1.2 - VOID AREA CEILING2 4 W1 MH : 3 3 W2 MH : 1 2 W2MH : 1 4 W2MH : 1 4 W2MH : 1 4 K9 0MH : 3 8 K9 0MH : 3 8 W2MH : 1 7 . 5 W1 MH : 3 3 W2MH : 3 5 W2 MH : 3 5 W2MH : 2 5 D8 WMH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 WMH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 WMH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 WMH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 W2MH : 1 7 . 5 W2MH : 1 7 . 5 D8 WMH : 2 3 K9 0MH : 3 1 K9 0 MH : 3 1 K9 0 MH : 3 1 K9 0 MH : 3 1 K9 0 MH : 3 1 K9 0 MH : 3 1 K9 0MH : 3 0 K9 0MH : 3 0 K9 0 MH : 2 0 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 0 K9 0MH : 2 0 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K90MH : 3 0 K90MH : 2 8 K90MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 3 0 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 3 0 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0MH : 2 8 K9 0 MH : 2 0 D8 WMH : 1 4 . 8 3 3 D8 W MH : 2 3 D8 W MH : 2 3 D8 W MH : 2 3 K9 0 MH : 2 3 D8WMH : 2 3 D8WMH : 2 3 D8WMH : 2 3 K9 0MH : 2 0 W2MH : 3 5 D8 W MH : 2 3 D8 WMH : 2 3 D8WMH : 2 3 D8 WMH : 2 3 D8 WMH : 2 3 D8 WMH : 2 3 D8 W MH : 2 3 D8WMH : 2 3 D8 WMH : 2 3 K9 0MH : 1 6 K9 0MH : 1 6 K9 0 MH : 1 6 K9 0MH : 3 5 K9 0MH : 3 5 K9 0MH : 3 7 K9 0MH : 3 7 K9 0 MH : 3 7 K9 0MH : 3 4 . 3 3 3 0. 7 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 7 2 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 1 3 . 0 3 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 9 3 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 9 3 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 3 3 . 5 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 5 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 9 4 . 0 4 . 3 4. 5 4 . 7 4. 9 5 . 1 4 . 6 4. 4 3. 0 0. 8 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 0 2 . 2 2 . 5 3 . 0 3 . 1 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 6 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 3 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 9 4 . 1 4 . 3 4 . 3 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 3 4 . 3 4 . 3 4 . 4 4 . 5 4 . 6 4 . 8 5 . 0 5 . 4 5 . 8 6 . 3 6 . 8 6 . 4 6 . 2 4 . 1 1 . 6 0. 9 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 7 2 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 9 4. 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4. 3 4. 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4. 3 4 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 9 3 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 8 3 . 8 4 . 0 4 . 0 3 . 9 3 . 9 4. 5 4. 9 5 . 3 5.4 5 . 4 5 . 4 5. 3 5 . 2 5 . 2 5 . 3 5. 4 5 . 5 5. 6 5 . 9 6 . 4 7 . 1 7 . 6 8 . 5 8 . 6 8 . 9 6 . 3 1 . 4 1. 1 1 . 5 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 7 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 1 2 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 8 2 . 2 3 . 1 4 . 1 4 . 3 4 . 5 5 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 0 5 . 2 5 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 5 . 0 4 . 9 4 . 8 4 . 8 4 . 9 4 . 8 4 . 7 4 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 4 4 . 3 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 6 4 . 8 5 . 7 6 . 0 6 . 3 6 . 4 6 . 5 6 . 4 6 . 2 6 . 1 6 . 1 6 . 2 6 . 4 6 . 9 7 . 6 8 . 3 9 . 3 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 8 9 . 8 1 . 7 1. 4 1 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 1 2 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 3 1 . 5 2 . 7 4 . 6 5 . 1 6 . 0 6 . 0 5 . 9 6 . 1 5 . 9 5 . 9 5 . 8 5. 7 5 . 7 5. 8 5. 7 5. 6 5. 5 5 . 5 5 . 4 5 . 4 5. 3 5 . 3 5 . 3 5 . 2 5 . 1 5 . 0 5 . 0 4 . 9 4 . 8 4 . 8 4. 7 4. 6 5. 4 5. 6 6 . 5 7 . 3 7.7 7. 8 7. 7 7 . 4 7 . 4 7 . 5 7. 3 7. 5 7. 9 8 . 4 9 . 5 1 0 . 9 1 2 . 6 1 4 . 5 1 4 . 7 1 3 . 2 2 . 0 1. 9 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 4 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 4 5 . 2 6 . 0 6 . 9 7 . 0 7 . 3 7 . 0 6 . 8 6 . 7 6 . 5 6 . 5 6 . 5 6 . 6 6 . 6 6 . 5 6 . 4 6 . 2 6 . 1 6 . 0 6 . 1 6 . 1 6 . 0 5 . 9 5 . 8 5 . 7 5 . 6 5 . 6 5 . 5 5 . 4 5 . 3 5 . 1 5 . 2 6 . 3 6 . 5 8 . 8 9 . 8 1 0 . 1 9 . 4 9 . 0 8 . 8 8 . 9 8 . 7 9 . 0 9 . 5 1 0 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 4 . 1 1 6 . 8 1 7 . 6 1 6 . 8 2 . 6 2. 5 4 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 9 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 4 7. 1 8 . 2 8 . 7 8 . 5 8 . 3 8 . 1 7 . 8 7 . 6 7. 4 7 . 4 7 . 4 7 . 4 7 . 4 7. 3 7 . 2 7 . 0 6 . 9 6 . 8 6 . 8 6 . 9 6 . 7 6 . 7 6 . 6 6 . 5 6 . 4 6 . 4 6 . 3 6 . 1 6 . 0 5 . 9 5 . 3 5. 7 7 . 4 10 . 1 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 6 1 1 . 7 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 5 1 3 . 0 1 5 . 3 1 8 . 3 2 0 . 4 1 9 . 8 3 . 4 3. 2 4 . 8 4 . 6 4 . 4 4 . 9 5 . 9 7. 9 1 0 . 0 9 . 8 9 . 7 9 . 4 9 . 1 8 . 8 8 . 4 8 . 2 8 . 3 8 . 3 8 . 4 8 . 3 8 . 1 7 . 9 7 . 7 7 . 7 7 . 6 7 . 5 7 . 6 7 . 4 7 . 5 7 . 4 7 . 2 7 . 1 6 . 9 6 . 8 6 . 6 6 . 5 6 . 5 5 . 6 5 . 1 4 . 8 9 . 5 1 5 . 7 1 6 . 2 1 4 . 6 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 8 1 2 . 0 1 2 . 1 1 2 . 7 1 3 . 7 1 5 . 6 1 8 . 6 2 1 . 5 2 1 . 7 4 . 5 3. 9 5 . 2 5 . 1 5 . 9 7 . 8 8 . 9 1 0 . 5 1 1 . 5 1 2 . 4 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 0 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 2 9 . 9 9 . 5 9 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 1 9 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 0 8 . 8 8 . 5 8 . 4 8 . 3 8 . 2 8 . 4 8 . 3 8 . 3 8 . 0 7 . 8 7 . 9 7. 4 7. 0 6 . 7 6 . 3 6 . 1 5 . 6 19. 1 1 8 . 7 1 6 . 1 1 3 . 5 1 3 . 4 1 3 . 7 1 4 . 0 1 4 . 9 1 6 . 0 1 8 . 4 2 1 . 0 2 2 . 0 1 5 . 3 4. 6 5 . 5 6 . 3 8 . 0 1 0 . 1 1 1 . 1 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 9 1 3 . 7 1 3 . 0 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 9 . 9 9 . 5 9 . 2 9 . 0 8 . 9 8 . 8 8 . 9 8 . 9 8 . 8 8 . 7 8 . 5 8 . 4 8 . 4 8 . 3 8 . 0 8 . 0 7 . 1 6 . 6 20. 1 1 9 . 5 1 7 . 3 1 4 . 8 1 4 . 4 1 5 . 1 1 5 . 9 1 6 . 9 1 8 . 5 2 1 . 0 2 3 . 8 1 9 . 0 5. 3 6 . 6 7. 7 9. 7 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 6 1 2 . 6 1 4 . 5 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 2 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 9 1 2 . 7 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 9 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 1 9 . 8 9 . 7 9 . 4 9 . 3 9 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 2 9 . 3 9 . 1 8 . 8 8 . 9 8 . 7 8 . 6 8 . 6 9 . 0 9 . 2 1 0 . 6 1 1 . 8 1 6 . 7 1 9 . 0 1 8 . 9 1 7 . 2 1 5 . 1 1 5 . 4 1 6 . 3 1 7 . 2 1 8 . 7 2 1 . 2 2 3 . 5 1 6 . 3 6. 1 7 . 2 8 . 2 9 . 2 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 8 1 5 . 3 1 4 . 9 1 4 . 5 1 4 . 8 1 4 . 4 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 7 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 7 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 1 9 . 9 9 . 7 9 . 8 9 . 7 9 . 7 9 . 6 9 . 4 9 . 4 9 . 4 9 . 4 9 . 2 9 . 3 9 . 6 9 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 3 . 0 1 5 . 7 1 7 . 1 1 7 . 2 1 6 . 6 1 5 . 7 1 6 . 0 1 7 . 2 1 8 . 8 2 0 . 9 2 3 . 0 1 4 . 5 5. 9 6 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 7 . 2 1 6 . 2 1 6 . 1 1 6 . 1 1 5 . 9 1 5 . 6 1 5 . 2 1 4 . 5 1 3 . 9 1 3 . 3 1 2 . 8 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 9 . 9 1 0 . 0 9 . 8 9 . 6 9 . 7 9 . 6 9 . 6 9 . 6 9 . 6 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 3 1 2 . 0 1 3 . 8 1 4 . 9 1 6 . 2 1 6 . 5 1 6 . 2 1 6 . 2 1 7 . 0 1 8 . 2 1 9 . 7 2 2 . 0 1 2 . 9 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 7 . 3 1 8 . 4 1 8 . 2 1 8 . 1 1 8 . 0 1 7 . 4 1 7 . 0 1 6 . 1 1 5 . 2 1 4 . 4 1 3 . 8 1 3 . 1 1 2 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 4 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 0 9 . 8 9 . 8 9 . 8 9 . 9 9 . 9 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 9 1 1 . 4 1 2 . 2 1 3 . 8 1 4 . 8 1 5 . 7 1 6 . 3 1 6 . 6 1 6 . 7 1 7 . 6 1 8 . 8 2 0 . 5 1 2 . 4 1. 6 1 . 8 1 . 6 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 5 2 0 . 2 2 0 . 8 2 0 . 3 1 9 . 6 1 8 . 7 1 7 . 6 1 6 . 4 1 5 . 6 1 4 . 6 1 3 . 8 1 3 . 0 1 2 . 4 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 0 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 0 9 . 9 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 8 1 3 . 3 1 4 . 2 1 5 . 1 1 6 . 1 1 6 . 7 1 7 . 2 1 7 . 7 1 8 . 3 1 9 . 0 1 2 . 7 1. 6 1 . 8 2 5 . 3 2 4 . 2 2 3 . 7 2 3 . 3 2 3 . 2 2 2 . 1 2 1 . 0 1 9 . 6 1 8 . 3 1 6 . 7 1 5 . 5 1 4 . 5 1 3 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 5 1 3 . 8 1 4 . 9 1 6 . 2 1 7 . 4 1 8 . 1 1 8 . 4 1 8 . 8 1 8 . 9 1 8 . 8 10 . 8 2 7 . 7 2 6 . 8 2 7 . 1 2 6 . 8 2 6 . 1 2 5 . 2 2 3 . 7 2 1 . 8 2 0 . 0 1 8 . 1 1 6 . 5 1 5 . 3 1 4 . 2 1 3 . 3 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 4 1 3 . 6 1 4 . 8 1 6 . 0 1 7 . 4 1 8 . 7 1 9 . 6 1 9 . 9 1 9 . 8 1 8 . 9 11 . 4 2 8 . 9 3 0 . 3 3 0 . 3 2 9 . 8 2 8 . 4 2 6 . 6 2 4 . 2 2 1 . 6 1 9 . 6 1 7 . 8 1 6 . 2 1 4 . 8 1 3 . 8 1 3 . 0 1 2 . 3 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 0 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 4 1 3 . 2 1 4 . 5 1 6 . 0 1 7 . 6 1 9 . 2 2 0 . 5 2 1 . 4 2 1 . 5 2 0 . 4 9. 8 3 2 . 3 3 3 . 5 3 3 . 1 3 1 . 5 2 9 . 4 2 6 . 6 2 3 . 6 2 1 . 1 1 8 . 8 1 6 . 9 1 5 . 5 1 4 . 4 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 0 1 1 . 0 1 1 . 0 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 2 1 3 . 0 1 4 . 3 1 5 . 8 1 7 . 6 1 9 . 5 2 1 . 1 2 2 . 4 2 2 . 9 2 1 . 9 9. 7 3 4 . 9 3 5 . 6 3 4 . 2 3 1 . 9 2 8 . 8 2 5 . 6 2 2 . 5 1 9 . 8 1 7 . 6 1 6 . 1 1 4 . 8 1 3 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 2 . 2 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 0 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 0 1 2 . 7 1 3 . 7 1 5 . 3 1 7 . 1 1 9 . 1 2 1 . 1 2 2 . 8 2 4 . 0 2 3 . 4 9. 6 3 6 . 4 3 6 . 3 3 4 . 1 3 0 . 7 2 7 . 3 2 3 . 9 2 0 . 9 1 8 . 6 1 6 . 5 1 5 . 1 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 1 1 2 . 5 1 1 . 9 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 9 1 2 . 4 1 3 . 3 1 4 . 6 1 6 . 3 1 8 . 2 2 0 . 4 2 2 . 6 2 4 . 0 2 4 . 0 9. 6 3 6 . 6 3 5 . 5 3 2 . 3 2 8 . 7 2 5 . 1 2 1 . 9 1 9 . 3 1 7 . 1 1 5 . 5 1 4 . 1 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 7 1 2 . 2 1 2 . 7 1 3 . 7 1 5 . 2 1 7 . 1 1 9 . 3 2 1 . 6 2 3 . 6 2 3 . 9 9. 3 3 5 . 1 3 3 . 0 2 9 . 5 2 5 . 9 2 2 . 5 1 9 . 6 1 7 . 3 1 5 . 6 1 4 . 2 1 3 . 1 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 5 1 2 . 1 1 2 . 8 1 3 . 8 1 5 . 4 1 7 . 6 1 9 . 9 2 2 . 1 2 3 . 1 9. 2 3 2 . 1 2 9 . 6 2 6 . 1 2 2 . 8 1 9 . 9 1 7 . 5 1 5 . 6 1 4 . 2 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 5 1 1 . 9 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 5 1 2 . 2 1 2 . 7 1 3 . 8 17 . 6 1 9 . 9 2 1 . 5 9. 1 2 8 . 4 2 5 . 8 2 2 . 7 1 9 . 9 1 7 . 5 1 5 . 5 1 4 . 2 1 3 . 3 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 2 . 6 18 . 8 9. 0 2 4 . 4 2 2 . 2 1 9 . 6 1 7 . 2 1 5 . 4 1 4 . 0 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 5 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 9 16 . 0 9. 6 2 1 . 5 1 9 . 1 1 6 . 9 1 5 . 3 1 4 . 1 1 3 . 1 1 2 . 4 1 2 . 0 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 4 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 9 13 . 8 16 . 8 2 2 . 9 2 0 . 9 1 8 . 4 1 6 . 5 1 4 . 9 1 3 . 7 1 2 . 7 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 5 1 2 . 2 1 2 . 9 1 4 . 2 25 . 6 2 4 . 4 2 2 . 0 1 9 . 7 1 7 . 5 1 5 . 6 1 4 . 2 1 3 . 2 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 8 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 8 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 9 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 . 9 1 3 . 8 1 5 . 4 26 . 1 2 4 . 5 2 2 . 4 2 0 . 2 1 8 . 2 1 6 . 3 1 4 . 6 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 4 1 1 . 7 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 9 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 4 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 5 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 9 1 1 . 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 . 9 1 4 . 1 1 5 . 6 21 . 6 2 0 . 0 1 8 . 1 1 6 . 4 1 4 . 9 1 3 . 5 1 2 . 4 1 1 . 6 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 0 9 . 9 9 . 9 1 0 . 0 9 . 8 9 . 9 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 . 9 1 3 . 6 17 . 4 1 6 . 1 1 4 . 6 1 3 . 4 1 2 . 3 1 1 . 3 1 0 . 7 1 0 . 2 9 . 9 9 . 5 9 . 4 9 . 4 9 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 4 9 . 5 9 . 9 1 0 . 3 1 0 . 6 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 5 14 . 2 1 3 . 1 1 2 . 1 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 5 9 . 9 9 . 5 9 . 2 9 . 0 8 . 9 8 . 8 8 . 8 8 . 9 8 . 9 8 . 7 8 . 8 9 . 0 9 . 4 9 . 8 1 0 . 1 1 0 . 2 11 . 8 1 1 . 1 1 0 . 3 9 . 7 9 . 3 8 . 9 8 . 7 8 . 6 8 . 5 8 . 4 8 . 4 8 . 5 8 . 5 8 . 4 8 . 5 8 . 6 8 . 9 9 . 3 9 . 4 10 . 2 9 . 7 9 . 2 8 . 8 8 . 6 8 . 4 8 . 3 8 . 2 8 . 1 8 . 2 8 . 2 8 . 2 8 . 1 8 . 3 8 . 5 8 . 7 8 . 7 9. 1 8 . 8 8 . 5 8 . 2 8 . 0 7 . 9 7 . 9 7 . 8 7 . 9 7 . 9 8 . 0 7 . 8 8 . 1 8 . 3 8 . 2 8. 5 8 . 3 8 . 0 7 . 8 7 . 8 7. 7 7. 6 7. 7 7. 8 7 . 9 7 . 8 7 . 9 7 . 8 8. 1 7 . 9 7 . 7 7 . 7 7 . 7 7 . 6 7 . 7 7 . 7 7 . 8 7 . 8 7 . 6 7. 7 7. 6 7. 5 7 . 5 7 . 4 7 . 5 7. 6 7. 7 7 . 4 7. 4 7 . 3 7 . 3 7 . 3 7 . 4 7 . 5 7 . 3 7. 1 7 . 2 7 . 2 7 . 2 7 . 1 7. 0 7 . 0 6 . 8 6. 5 LEVEL 01 VARIES LEVEL 1.5 VARIES SF R S SF R S SFRSSFRS SFRS SF R S SF R S SFRS SFRS SF R S SF R S SF R S SF R S SFRS S FRS SFRS S FRS SFRS SFRS SFRS SFRS Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min B1 - ENTRY RAMP_1_Top Illuminance Fc 35.04 61.9 0.0 N.A. N.A. B1 - EXIT RAMP_Top Illuminance Fc 19.29 48.8 0.1 192.90 488.00 B1_SLAB_Top Illuminance Fc 10.65 36.6 0.7 15.21 52.29 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts Mounting Height 27 TT-D8-740-U-WQ Single TT-D8-740-U-WQ D8W 1.000 17562 148.7 4014.9 14.833, 23 43 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-90L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-90L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K90 0.850 11922 97 4171 16, 20, 23, 28, 30, 31, 34.333, 35, 37, 38 2 XTOR1B-W Single XTOR1B-W W1 0.850 1397 12.2 24.4 33 11 GLEON-SA1A-740-U-T4FT Single GLEON-SA1A-740-U-T4FT W2 0.850 4909 34 374 12, 14, 17.5, 25, 35 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 19 / 0 5 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 4 : 4 9   p .   m . LEVEL B1 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.01A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL B1 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% DD 12/06/2024 100% DD 02/14/2025 50% CD 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 2 05/19/2025 Bulletin #2 2 PP PP 'GDP' '1TE1' '1EH1' '1EL1' '1RP' '1L1' '1T1' '1H1' 'SEC' 'FACP' 'CO1' 'CO2''1EH2' 'EGDP' '1TLA' '1TLB' 'BMS 2''BMS 1' 1H1-1 (1RP-18) D6M 1EH1-17 D6ME 1H1-1 K40 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-5 X1 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-17 K40E 1EH1-17 K40E 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-1 K40 1H1-1 K40 1H1-2 ST1 1EH1-6 ST1 1H1-2 ST1 1EH1-6 ST1 1EH1-6 ST1 1EH1-12 ST1 1EH1-12 ST1 EM EM 1EH1-5 X1 EM EM EM 1EH1-19 RX7 3EH1-6 ST1 3EH1-6 ST1 WP WP L2 L2 EM EM 3EH1-6 ST1 3EH1-6 ST1 1EH1-17 K40E 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-17 K40E EMEM 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W1 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±7' 1EH1-12 X1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±14' 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±14' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W1 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±14' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W2 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W1 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W2 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W1 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1H1-3 (1RP-3) W2 1H1-3 (1RP-3) ±10' 1H1-1 K40 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-1 K40 1H1-1 (1RP-18) D6M 1H1-1 (1RP-18) D6M 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±14' 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±7' EM EM UTILITY ROOM FIRE RISER ROOM ELECTRICAL ROOM EM EM EM EM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1EH1-19 RX7 1EH1-19 RX7 EM EM 3EH1-6 RX7 EM 1H1-1 K40 L4 L1 BEP BEP EM EM X1 EM 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) W1 1EH1-11 (1RP-4) ±14' 1EH1-5 X1 EM EM EM E2.10 1 E2.10 2 E2.10 3 1EH1-8 ST1 1EH1-8 ST1 1EH1-8 ST1 L4 1EH1-12 RX7 1H1-1 RX7 1H1-3 W1 1H1-3 ±10' L1 WP 1EH1-4 BEP EM L1 1H1-11H1-1 1H1-1 1H1-1 L6 L6 L6 L6 EM L2 L9 1EH1-2 ST2 L8 1H1-1 (1RP-18) EM EM 1H1-15 1H1-15 1H1-15 1EH1-5 X1 1EH1-6 ST1 1H1-2 ST1 1EH1-6 ST1 1H1-2 ST1 4 4 EM EM LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOF STA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 26 / 0 6 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 4 7 : 4 9 p . m . LEVEL 1 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.02 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 1 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATOR INSTALLER L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATOR INSTALLER L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TO LEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. L8 ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L9 ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% DD 12/06/2024 100% DD 02/14/2025 50% CD 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 4 06/25/2025 Bulletin #4 12. 1 1 3 . 9 1 5 . 4 1 5 . 5 1 4 . 3 1 2 . 1 15. 6 1 8 . 2 1 9 . 7 1 9 . 7 1 7 . 4 1 5 . 1 18. 7 2 2 . 6 2 4 . 9 2 4 . 2 2 0 . 8 1 7 . 6 21. 0 2 5 . 6 2 8 . 5 2 7 . 3 2 3 . 1 1 9 . 3 21. 5 2 5 . 8 2 8 . 4 2 7 . 5 2 3 . 5 1 9 . 8 20. 8 2 4 . 3 2 6 . 4 2 5 . 9 2 2 . 7 1 9 . 4 20. 6 2 3 . 7 2 5 . 4 2 5 . 0 2 2 . 5 1 9 . 3 21. 4 2 5 . 0 2 6 . 9 2 6 . 3 2 3 . 4 1 9 . 9 22. 5 2 6 . 9 2 9 . 4 2 8 . 4 2 4 . 7 2 0 . 8 22. 8 2 7 . 4 3 0 . 1 2 8 . 9 2 5 . 0 2 0 . 9 21. 6 2 5 . 5 2 7 . 8 2 7 . 0 2 3 . 7 1 9 . 9 20. 0 2 3 . 0 2 4 . 7 2 4 . 3 2 1 . 8 1 8 . 7 19. 3 2 2 . 0 2 3 . 5 2 3 . 3 2 1 . 0 1 8 . 2 19. 7 2 3 . 0 2 5 . 0 2 4 . 4 2 1 . 5 1 8 . 5 20. 5 2 4 . 8 2 7 . 3 2 6 . 4 2 2 . 5 1 8 . 9 20. 2 2 4 . 7 2 7 . 5 2 6 . 3 2 2 . 2 1 8 . 4 18. 0 2 1 . 7 2 3 . 9 2 3 . 2 1 9 . 8 1 6 . 6 14. 9 1 7 . 2 1 8 . 6 1 8 . 5 1 6 . 4 1 4 . 1 11. 9 1 3 . 4 1 4 . 2 1 4 . 3 1 3 . 3 1 1 . 8 9.6 1 0 . 7 1 1 . 2 1 1 . 5 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 1 14. 4 1 7 . 4 1 8 . 8 1 8 . 4 1 6 . 3 1 3 . 5 18. 0 2 1 . 9 2 4 . 0 2 3 . 2 1 9 . 9 1 6 . 3 20. 9 2 5 . 8 2 8 . 5 2 7 . 3 2 3 . 3 1 8 . 9 22. 4 2 7 . 7 3 0 . 3 2 9 . 0 2 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 22. 7 2 7 . 3 2 9 . 8 2 8 . 7 2 4 . 9 2 0 . 2 22. 5 2 7 . 1 2 9 . 5 2 8 . 4 2 4 . 6 2 0 . 2 22. 1 2 7 . 1 2 9 . 7 2 8 . 4 2 4 . 2 2 0 . 1 19. 9 2 4 . 6 2 8 . 1 2 6 . 9 2 2 . 9 1 9 . 1 17. 1 2 0 . 3 2 2 . 2 2 1 . 1 1 9 . 7 1 6 . 7 13. 6 1 4 . 4 1 5 . 5 1 5 . 0 1 3 . 3 1 3 . 5 23. 0 2 7 . 5 3 0 . 2 3 1 . 6 3 2 . 2 3 2 . 3 3 1 . 3 2 8 . 5 2 4 . 6 24. 7 3 0 . 3 3 4 . 0 3 5 . 3 3 5 . 8 3 6 . 3 3 5 . 3 3 1 . 7 2 6 . 6 24. 2 3 1 . 2 3 5 . 5 3 6 . 3 3 6 . 8 3 8 . 0 3 7 . 4 3 3 . 3 2 7 . 4 22. 0 2 9 . 9 3 3 . 1 3 4 . 3 3 5 . 3 3 6 . 9 3 7 . 0 3 3 . 4 2 7 . 6 23. 1 2 6 . 4 2 8 . 9 3 0 . 1 3 2 . 4 3 5 . 1 3 6 . 5 3 3 . 4 2 8 . 0 1. 8 3 . 4 7 . 2 7 . 8 5. 7 7. 8 9 . 8 3 . 6 0 . 0 0 . 1 2. 4 4. 7 12 . 5 1 3 . 8 6 . 5 1 3 . 1 1 8 . 3 0. 3 3. 0 4 . 1 4. 5 14 . 5 1 5 . 2 0. 6 3. 6 4 . 3 3 . 2 17 . 8 2 1 . 7 3. 2 5. 1 5 . 6 7 . 6 1 1 . 5 1 6 . 2 2 4 . 0 3 5 . 2 4 0 . 2 4 2 . 3 3 3 . 0 5. 9 6 . 9 9 . 9 1 2 . 4 1 7 . 1 2 8 . 0 4 3 . 6 4 7 . 0 4 9 . 0 4 0 . 2 6. 3 7 . 9 1 1 . 4 1 3 . 3 1 7 . 4 2 8 . 3 4 0 . 9 4 5 . 8 45 . 5 38 . 8 6. 1 6 . 9 9 . 4 1 1 . 6 1 6 . 1 2 7 . 0 4 2 . 5 44 . 7 46 . 9 3 9 . 8 5. 5 5. 9 7. 4 9. 4 1 3 . 3 2 1 . 0 3 0 . 3 3 2 . 9 3 3 . 8 3 0 . 2 4. 8 5. 5 6. 6 8 . 1 1 0 . 4 1 3 . 7 1 7 . 1 1 8 . 9 1 9 . 4 1 9 . 3 4. 6 5 . 3 5 . 8 6 . 9 8 . 2 9 . 3 1 0 . 4 1 1 . 3 1 1 . 8 1 3 . 5 4. 6 5. 5 6. 2 6 . 9 6 . 9 7 . 3 7 . 3 7 . 8 8 . 2 1 0 . 5 4. 7 6. 4 8 . 3 8 . 3 6 . 9 6 . 7 6 . 5 6 . 6 6 . 9 9 . 3 2. 1 2 . 8 3 . 4 4 . 3 5 . 1 6 . 9 9 . 5 8 . 8 7 . 0 6 . 6 6 . 6 6 . 2 6 . 5 9 . 1 2. 3 3 . 1 3 . 9 4 . 6 5 . 1 6 . 3 7. 7 7. 9 7 . 3 7 . 9 8 . 2 6 . 9 6 . 3 9 . 3 2. 9 3 . 5 4. 4 4. 8 6 . 1 6 . 1 6 . 8 7 . 0 7. 4 8. 7 9 . 5 7. 7 6. 5 9 . 4 3. 2 4. 5 6. 1 6 . 1 6 . 0 7 . 0 8 . 0 8 . 0 7 . 3 7. 7 8. 0 6 . 7 6 . 0 9 . 2 3. 8 6 . 1 8 . 5 7 . 9 6 . 8 8 . 0 9 . 9 8 . 9 6 . 7 6 . 2 5 . 9 5. 4 5. 6 8 . 5 3. 9 5 . 8 7 . 6 7. 5 6. 7 7 . 6 8 . 6 8 . 1 6 . 2 5. 5 4. 9 4 . 8 4 . 8 7. 7 3. 6 5 . 1 5 . 9 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 8 6 . 7 6 . 5 5 . 2 4. 7 4. 0 4 . 0 4 . 3 6 . 9 3. 7 4 . 8 5. 7 6. 0 6 . 3 6 . 2 6 . 3 5 . 9 4 . 9 4 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 4 3 . 6 5. 7 3. 6 5 . 2 7 . 1 6 . 8 6 . 0 6 . 5 7. 4 6. 4 4. 7 3. 8 3 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 6 3. 6 5 . 9 7 . 9 7 . 3 6 . 0 6 . 8 8 . 3 6 . 9 4 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 1 3. 0 4. 5 6. 1 5. 7 4. 9 5. 4 6. 3 5. 4 3. 8 2 . 8 2 . 1 0. 0 0 . 0 2 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 7 3 . 8 3 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 9 3 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 4. 6 2 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 3 1 . 1 1 . 0 2. 1 3 . 3 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 4 22 . 5 2 5 . 6 2 5 . 5 2 3 . 6 1 4 . 0 9 . 0 1 7 . 4 2 3 . 9 1 0 . 5 4 . 9 3 . 3 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 1 20 . 9 2 3 . 1 2 3 . 1 2 1 . 1 1 3 . 9 1 1 . 6 2 7 . 0 3 9 . 1 1 5 . 6 6 . 7 4 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 1 2 . 9 9. 9 9 . 6 9 . 2 8 . 6 7 . 9 1 0 . 9 2 8 . 4 4 1 . 4 1 7 . 2 7 . 9 5 . 8 4 . 8 4. 4 3. 8 6. 2 5 . 1 4 . 6 4. 7 5 . 4 8. 7 2 2 . 1 3 2 . 0 1 4 . 6 8 . 5 8 . 9 6 . 9 5 . 0 4 . 6 3. 7 3 . 5 3 . 3 3 . 4 4. 4 6. 0 1 1 . 0 1 4 . 1 9 . 5 8 . 9 1 1 . 3 8 . 8 5. 7 5. 0 4. 0 4 . 1 5 . 6 6 . 4 6 . 5 6 . 8 7 . 8 6 . 4 5 . 0 4. 7 4. 1 3 . 4 4 . 1 4. 7 5. 1 5. 5 5. 2 4 . 9 4 . 6 4 . 0 4. 9 3 . 7 4 . 0 4. 4 4. 8 4. 7 4. 6 4 . 2 3 . 7 3 . 4 7. 1 4. 5 4 . 4 4. 9 5 . 0 5 . 0 4. 7 3. 9 3 . 3 2 . 9 8. 4 5 . 2 4 . 8 5. 7 7 . 4 6. 2 4. 7 3. 9 3 . 1 2 . 6 7. 6 4 . 8 4 . 9 7 . 1 1 0 . 5 8 . 4 5 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 5 7. 1 4 . 3 4 . 9 5 . 8 7 . 8 6 . 6 4 . 8 3 . 9 3 . 1 2 . 5 8. 6 4 . 6 4 . 3 4. 7 5. 1 5 . 0 4 . 8 3 . 9 3 . 3 2 . 8 8. 5 4. 5 3. 8 4 . 0 4. 5 4. 6 4 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 6 3 . 2 6. 8 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 3 4 . 8 5 . 1 4. 7 4 . 5 3. 6 7. 0 3 . 6 3 . 2 3 . 4 4 . 3 5. 5 7 . 7 6. 4 4. 7 4. 3 7. 1 3 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 1 3 . 9 6 . 5 1 0 . 1 8 . 1 5 . 1 4. 5 5. 1 2 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 7 3 . 6 4 . 8 6 . 5 5. 5 4. 3 4 . 0 2. 9 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 7 3 . 6 3 . 1 1. 0 1 . 3 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 0. 9 1 . 1 1 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 7 0. 8 0 . 9 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 1 0. 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 4 1 . 4 0. 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 4 1. 6 1. 7 0. 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0. 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 5 1. 8 1 . 9 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 1. 0 1. 1 1. 3 1 . 3 1. 4 1. 6 1 . 9 2 . 1 1 . 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 4 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 7 2. 0 2 . 3 1 . 3 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1 . 7 1. 6 1. 5 1 . 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1. 7 2. 0 2 . 4 1 . 3 1. 5 1. 6 1. 7 1 . 7 1. 6 1. 5 1 . 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 4 1. 0 1 . 2 1. 4 1. 1 1. 3 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 2 1. 5 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 1 1. 3 1. 5 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 5 1 . 4 1 . 4 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 7 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 5 1 . 4 1 . 4 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 7 1. 3 1. 5 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 4 1. 3 1. 5 1 . 7 1. 3 1. 4 1. 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1. 5 1 . 7 1. 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 9 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 1. 1 1. 3 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 8 1 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 8 1. 4 1. 0 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 1. 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1. 6 1. 7 1 . 4 1. 0 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 3 0. 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 3 0. 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 1 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 3 0. 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 3 0. 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 3 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 0. 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1. 1 0. 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1. 1 0. 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 0 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 6 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 3 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 6 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 4 1. 4 1 . 4 1. 2 1. 1 1. 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 5 0 . 6 1 . 8 1. 7 1 . 5 1. 3 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 7 0 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 4 1. 6 1. 4 1. 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0. 9 1 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 1. 2 1 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 0 2 . 5 2 . 1 1 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 8 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 1. 4 1 . 5 4. 0 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 6 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 1. 7 1 . 7 4. 6 3 . 8 3 . 2 2 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 1 1. 7 1 . 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 0 2 . 0 5 . 0 4. 1 3. 4 2 . 8 2 . 3 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 8 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 2 2 . 2 5. 1 4. 3 3 . 6 2 . 9 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 4 2 . 3 5. 1 4. 3 3 . 6 3 . 0 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 4 2 . 3 4 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 5 3 . 0 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 0 1 . 6 1. 4 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 5 2 . 3 4. 5 3. 9 3 . 4 2 . 9 2 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 6 1. 4 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 4 2 . 2 4 . 0 3 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 3 1 . 9 1 . 6 1. 4 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 4 2 . 1 3 . 6 3 . 3 3 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 3 2 . 0 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 4 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 2 1 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 6 2 . 4 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 0 1. 7 1 . 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 1 1. 7 2. 5 2 . 4 2 . 4 2 . 2 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 9 1 . 6 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 0 1 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 0 1 . 8 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 0 1. 5 2. 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1. 7 1. 8 1. 7 1 . 5 1. 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 1. 9 1. 5 1. 8 1 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 7 1. 6 1. 4 1. 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 1. 8 1. 4 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 5 1. 6 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 1. 7 1 . 4 1. 6 1 . 6 1 . 6 1. 5 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 4 1. 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 1. 6 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 4 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0. 0 1. 5 1. 3 1. 4 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0. 0 0 . 5 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0. 0 0 . 3 0 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 0 1. 1 1 . 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0. 0 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 5 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 W1MH : 1 5 . 8 7 5 W1MH: 1 5 . 8 7 5 W1MH : 1 5 . 8 7 5 W2 MH: 1 5 . 8 7 5 W2 MH: 1 5 . 8 7 5 W2 MH: 1 5 . 8 7 5 W2MH: 1 5 . 8 7 5 RX7 MH: 8 . 8 RX 7 MH : 8 . 8 K40MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 K40MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 K40MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 ST 1 MH : 1 3 . 9 5 8 ST 1 MH : 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX7 MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX7 MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX7MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX7 MH: 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX 7 MH : 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX 7 MH : 1 3 . 9 5 8 RX 7 MH : 1 3 . 9 5 8 W1 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2MH: 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W1 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W1 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W1 MH: 1 7 . 0 1 3 W1 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2 MH : 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2 MH: 1 7 . 0 1 3 W2 MH: 1 7 . 0 1 3 K40MH: 1 3 . 2 1 2 K4 0 MH : 1 0 . 0 6 9 K40MH: 8 . 5 9 8 K4 0 MH : 9 . 5 K40MH: 9 . 5 D6 M MH : 9 . 5 D6 M MH : 9 . 5 D6 M MH : 9 . 5 D6 M MH : 9 . 5 K40 MH: 9 . 5 K40MH: 1 4 . 6 8 3 K4 0 MH : 1 7 . 1 6 7 ST1MH: 8 . 2 ST1MH: 8 . 2 ST1MH: 8 . 2 ST1MH: 8 . 2 ST1MH: 8 . 2 K4 0 MH : 9 . 5 K4 0 MH : 9 . 5 K40 MH: 9 . 5 K4 0 MH : 9 . 5 1.5 2.2 3.04.4 5.46.7 6.9 5.9 5.34.54.1 4.0 1.52.1 2.94.56.0 9.5 9.9 6.4 5.24.13.7 3.5 1.4 2.0 2.94.45.8 9.1 9.3 6.3 5.1 3.8 3.2 2.9 1.3 1.9 2.7 3.75.15.9 6.1 5.34.13.3 2.8 2.4 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.3 4.14.74.8 4.3 3.6 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.9 4.6 4.6 4.0 3.2 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.1 4.1 5.1 5.1 4.1 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.6 5.0 8.0 8.3 5.1 3.7 2.4 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.7 5.6 9.7 10.1 5.7 3.8 2.4 1.6 1.1 1.0 1.5 2.2 3.24.76.4 6.4 4.8 3.2 2.3 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.8 3.6 4.64.73.8 2.8 2.01.41.0 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.2 2.6 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.31.72.2 2.7 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.7 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.01.42.0 2.9 3.85.15.2 4.0 3.2 2.4 1.61.1 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.44.78.4 8.7 4.9 3.7 2.6 2.1 1.3 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.6 4.9 7.8 8.0 5.34.12.8 2.21.4 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.24.75.35.44.9 3.6 2.9 2.3 2.11. 9 1. 7 1 . 4 1. 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 2. 2 2 . 0 1. 7 1 . 5 1. 3 1. 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1. 1 0. 8 2. 6 2 . 4 2 . 2 2 . 0 1. 7 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 5 1. 6 1. 7 1. 6 1 . 3 3. 5 3 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 9 2 . 3 1 . 9 1. 7 2. 1 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 8 1 . 9 4. 2 5 . 0 4 . 9 3 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 4 3 . 5 4 . 8 3 . 9 2 . 9 4. 5 7. 9 8 . 4 4 . 6 3 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 4 2 . 8 5. 1 8. 6 5 . 9 2 . 8 4. 2 6 . 4 6 . 6 4. 1 2. 9 2 . 2 2 . 2 2 . 4 4. 1 6. 2 4 . 6 2 . 6 2. 9 3 . 5 3 . 4 2 . 9 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 7 2. 1 2 . 4 3 . 1 2 . 5 2 . 1 2. 2 2 . 3 2 . 2 1 . 8 1. 5 1. 3 1 . 2 1 . 3 1. 7 1. 9 1 . 6 1 . 2 1. 4 1 . 4 1. 3 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 7 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 7 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 222.6 10 GLEON-SA1A-740-U-T4FT Single GLEON-SA1A-740-U-T4FT W2 0.850 4909 34 3409 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 278.388 8 XTOR1B-W Single XTOR1B-W W1 0.850 1397 12.2 97.6 4 TT-D6-740-U-MQ Single TT-D6-740-U-MQ D6M 0.850 13253 105.2 420.8 15 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 675 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min ELECTRICAL_1_Floor Illuminance Fc 20.99 30.1 9.6 2.19 3.14 ELECTRICAL_2_Floor Illuminance Fc 22.04 30.3 13.3 1.66 2.28ELECTRICAL_Floor Illuminance Fc 31.44 38.0 22.0 1.43 1.73Level 1 Ramp_Lower_Top Illuminance Fc 3.34 10.1 0.9 3.71 11.22 Level 1 Ramp_Upper_Top Illuminance Fc 2.13 8.6 0.2 10.65 43.00 Level 1_Lower Landing_Top Illuminance Fc 9.46 49.0 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 1_Upper Landing_Top Illuminance Fc 6.12 41.4 0.6 10.20 69.00 Level B1_Top Illuminance Fc 0.74 2.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level B1b_Top Illuminance Fc 0.92 5.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min CalcPts_1 Illuminance Fc 2.60 26.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. Landing _2_Top Illuminance Fc 15.98 18.8 12.5 1.28 1.50 Landing 1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.68 20.1 17.3 1.08 1.16 Stair Tread_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.15 17.5 16.8 1.02 1.04 Stair Tread_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.40 17.5 17.3 1.01 1.01 Stair Tread_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.80 19.0 18.6 1.01 1.02Stair Tread_4_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.90 18.3 17.5 1.02 1.05 Stair Tread_4_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.80 15.8 13.8 1.07 1.14 Stair Tread_4_4_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.15 15.3 13.0 1.09 1.18 Stair Tread_4_5_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.75 15.0 12.5 1.10 1.20 Stair Tread_4_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.85 15.1 12.6 1.10 1.20 Stair Tread_4_6_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.85 16.7 15.0 1.06 1.11 Stair Tread_4_6_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.15 16.1 14.2 1.07 1.13 Stair Tread_4_6_4_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.20 16.3 14.1 1.08 1.16 Stair Tread_4_6_5_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.20 15.3 13.1 1.08 1.17 Stair Tread_4_6_6_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.50 14.5 12.5 1.08 1.16 Stair Tread_4_6_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.00 13.8 12.2 1.07 1.13 Stair Tread_4_6_8_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.60 14.5 12.7 1.07 1.14Stair Tread_4_6_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 16.25 17.2 15.3 1.06 1.12 Stair Tread_4_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 16.85 17.0 16.7 1.01 1.02 Stair Tread_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 16.10 16.7 15.5 1.04 1.08 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 7 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 216.524 3 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 95.4 12.2 19.6 17.3 14.9 18.8 21.1 21.6 18.9 12.2 16.1 26.1 21.4 15.8 17.4 18.5 18.6 17.1 11.3 16.5 26.8 21.3 15.1 14.9 14.6 13.1 21.1 17.5 14.1 7.6 11.5 10.6 9.6 12.5 15.4 17.2 16.4 14.6 15.0 17.6 18.8 17.7 15.7 13.4 16.7 17.0 15.7 17.3 18.5 18.6 20.1 19.3 17.9 19.1 18.6 16.8 17.5 17.3 17.5 18.6 19.0 17.5 18.3 13.8 15.8 13.0 15.3 12.5 15.0 12.6 15.1 16.7 15.0 16.1 14.2 16.3 14.1 15.3 13.1 14.5 12.5 13.8 12.2 14.5 12.7 17.2 15.3 16.7 17.0 15.5 16.7 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L G.C G.B G.Q LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 2 8   p .   m . LEVEL 1 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.02A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE =1 : 150 LEVEL 1 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 SCALE = 1/4" = 1'-0" LEVEL1 STAIR ENLARGED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN2 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-5 X1 1EH1-17 K40E 1H1-1 ST1 1EH1-12 ST1 1EH1-12 ST1 EM EM 1EH1-5 X1 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-5 X1 1EH1-17 K40E 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-17 K40E 1H1-1 (1RP-2) K40 1EH1-5 X1 EM 3EH1-6 ST1 3EH1-6 ST1 3EH1-6 X1 EM 1EH1-12 X1 1EH1-3 (1RP-7) S1 1H1-13 (1RP-6) S1 1EH1-3 (1RP-7) S1 1H1-1 K40 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-17 K40E 1H1-1 (1RP-2) K40 1H1-1 K40 1EH1-12 X1 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L 1H1-13 (1RP-6) S1 EM 1EH1-3 (1RP-7) S1 EM EM EM 1EH1-16 RX7 1EH1-16 RX7 1EH1-16 RX7 3EH1-6 RX7 3EH1-6 RX7 EM EM EM 1EH1-1 W1 L4 WP WP L2 L2 L2BEP BEP EM EM L1 1EH1-5 X1 1H1-1 RX7 1H1-1 RX7 1H1-1 RX7 1H1-13 (1RP-6) S1 1H1-1 1H1-1 1H1-1 1H1-1 L6L6 L6 L6 1H1-12 1H1-12 1H1-12 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 0   p .   m . LEVEL 2 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.03 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TOLEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set S1 MH : 2 7 . 8 3 2 ST 1 MH : 2 2 S1 MH : 2 6 . 4 8 5 S1 MH : 2 5 . 3 4 S1 MH : 2 4 . 8 8 5 S1 MH : 2 4 . 6 1 1 S1 MH : 2 3 . 7 4 21. 8 2 2 . 4 2 0 . 5 24.7 2 5 . 3 2 3 . 4 25. 8 2 6 . 4 2 4 . 6 25. 7 2 6 . 5 2 4 . 6 2. 8 6 . 7 9 . 6 7 . 2 9 . 8 6 . 6 2 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 6 1 . 0 3. 9 1 1 . 4 1 8 . 2 1 1 . 2 1 8 . 5 1 2 . 5 2 3 . 4 2 0 . 6 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 7 7. 4 8. 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 4 . 3 1 2 . 8 9 . 3 3 . 6 1 . 9 3. 3 4 . 3 3 . 6 0 . 0 0 . 0 5. 4 16 . 7 1 3 . 2 4. 5 2. 3 3. 3 3 . 6 4 . 1 4. 4 5. 1 6 . 3 8 . 9 7 . 1 3 . 7 2 . 2 3. 6 3 . 7 4 . 3 5. 4 7 . 7 7. 0 5. 5 4. 3 2 . 8 1 . 7 3. 7 3 . 8 4. 4 6. 6 1 0 . 1 8 . 1 5 . 1 3 . 6 2 . 4 1 . 5 3. 6 3 . 6 4. 4 5 . 4 6. 9 5 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 2 1 . 4 3. 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 4 . 6 4. 7 4 . 4 4. 0 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 4 3. 0 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 2 4 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 1 3 . 8 4. 5 4 . 7 4 . 4 4. 0 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 1 4 . 1 5 . 3 6 . 9 5 . 9 4 . 1 3 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 6 3 . 2 4 . 0 6 . 3 1 0 . 0 7 . 9 4. 7 3. 3 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 1 4 . 1 5 . 3 7. 5 6. 4 4 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 1 3 . 9 4. 5 5. 1 4 . 6 4 . 1 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 0 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 3 4 . 9 4. 5 3. 6 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 3. 3 3 . 3 4 . 0 4. 4 5. 2 4 . 6 4 . 0 2 . 7 2 . 0 1 . 3 3. 6 3 . 4 4 . 1 5 . 2 7 . 6 6 . 3 4 . 1 3 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 3 3. 5 3 . 4 3 . 9 5 . 9 9 . 5 7. 4 4. 3 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 2 3. 2 3 . 0 3 . 6 4. 5 5. 8 4 . 8 3 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 0 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 3 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 3 0 . 9 1. 9 1 . 9 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 3 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 0 1. 3 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 2 0 . 9 0. 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0. 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 10 . 0 6 . 0 4 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 1 13 . 6 6 . 4 4 . 0 3 . 1 2 . 7 2 . 4 15 . 7 7 . 1 4. 4 3. 3 2 . 9 2 . 7 14 . 7 7 . 1 4. 8 3 . 9 3 . 5 3 . 3 11 . 6 7. 1 5. 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4. 6 9. 0 7 . 3 5 . 8 5 . 3 5 . 2 6 . 0 5. 1 6. 1 7. 1 7. 7 9. 8 9 . 3 6 . 4 5. 5 5 . 4 7. 3 3. 4 4 . 2 5 . 2 6 . 3 9 . 0 8 . 9 6 . 2 5. 4 5 . 4 6. 1 2. 6 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 1 6. 1 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 2. 2 2 . 9 3 . 6 4 . 6 5 . 0 5. 1 4. 9 4 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 7 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 4 4. 5 4. 8 4 . 9 4 . 8 4 . 0 3 . 6 3 . 2 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 8 4 . 6 5. 7 5. 8 4 . 9 4 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 8 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 3 8 . 4 5. 4 4. 2 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 0 8 . 1 5. 4 4. 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 9 4. 4 3. 5 3 . 0 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 3 5. 5 4. 9 4 . 3 3 . 9 3 . 6 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5 . 2 5. 5 5. 0 4 . 6 4. 5 4. 2 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 5 4 . 8 7. 1 7. 4 5 . 7 5. 0 4. 7 5. 3 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 2 4 . 6 8 . 5 8 . 8 5. 5 4. 8 4. 7 6. 4 1. 3 1 . 9 2 . 9 4 . 0 5. 7 5. 9 4 . 9 4. 4 4. 3 4 . 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 0 3 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 5 1. 2 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 4 1. 1 1 . 4 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1 . 8 1. 7 1 . 7 0. 9 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 14 . 9 2 1 . 3 2 1 . 4 1 8 . 6 1 0 . 0 6 . 0 4 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 1 29 . 2 41 . 5 39 . 4 3 3 . 5 1 3 . 6 6 . 4 4 . 0 3 . 1 2 . 7 2 . 4 10 . 0 1 8 . 1 2 1 . 1 2 2 . 0 2 4 . 9 3 7 . 0 5 0 . 2 4 7 . 0 3 9 . 8 15 . 7 7 . 1 4. 4 3. 3 2 . 9 2 . 7 11 . 7 22 . 0 2 5 . 4 2 6 . 0 2 7 . 4 3 4 . 3 45 . 1 42 . 2 3 6 . 0 14 . 7 7 . 1 4. 8 3 . 9 3 . 5 3 . 3 5. 5 9. 1 1 1 . 0 1 2 . 2 1 4 . 0 2 0 . 2 2 6 . 2 2 5 . 4 2 2 . 0 1 1 . 6 7. 1 5. 4 4 . 4 4 . 4 4. 6 2. 5 3 . 7 4. 7 5 . 7 7. 0 9 . 3 11 . 4 12 . 0 1 1 . 0 9 . 0 7 . 3 5 . 8 5 . 3 5 . 2 6 . 0 1. 3 1 . 9 2 . 5 3 . 1 4 . 0 5. 1 6. 1 7. 1 7. 7 9. 8 9 . 3 6 . 4 5. 5 5 . 4 7. 3 3. 4 4 . 2 5 . 2 6 . 3 9 . 0 8 . 9 6 . 2 5. 4 5 . 4 6. 1 2. 6 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 1 6. 1 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 2. 2 2 . 9 3 . 6 4 . 6 5 . 0 5. 1 4. 9 4 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 7 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 4 4. 5 4. 8 4 . 9 4 . 8 4 . 0 3 . 6 3 . 2 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 8 4 . 6 5. 7 5. 8 4 . 9 4 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 8 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 3 8 . 4 5. 4 4. 2 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 0 8 . 1 5. 4 4. 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 9 4. 4 3. 5 3 . 0 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 3 5. 5 4. 9 4 . 3 3 . 9 3 . 6 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5 . 2 5. 5 5. 0 4 . 6 4. 5 4. 2 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 5 4 . 8 7. 1 7. 4 5 . 7 5. 0 4. 7 5. 3 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 2 4 . 6 8 . 5 8 . 8 5. 5 4. 8 4. 7 6. 4 1. 3 1 . 9 2 . 9 4 . 0 5. 7 5. 9 4 . 9 4. 4 4. 3 4 . 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 0 3 . 3 3 . 6 3 . 7 3 . 4 3 . 4 3 . 5 1. 2 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 5 2 . 4 1. 1 1 . 4 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1 . 8 1. 7 1 . 7 0. 9 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 1 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 6. 2 5 . 0 5. 4 4. 1 5. 9 6 . 6 10 . 6 1 0 . 2 K4 0 MH : 2 0 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 2 0 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 2 0 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 K4 0 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 K4 0 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 K4 0 MH : 9 . 3 8 K4 0 MH : 1 1 . 7 8 7 K4 0 MH : 1 4 . 1 5 K4 0 MH : 1 4 . 2 7 1 K4 0 MH : 1 6 . 6 0 5 K4 0 MH : 1 8 . 9 6 5 K4 0 MH : 2 0 . 7 7 K4 0 MH : 2 3 . 1 8 7 K4 0 MH : 2 5 . 5 6 4 K4 0 MH : 2 6 . 1 0 7 K4 0 MH : 2 7 . 9 3 RX 7 MH : 2 0 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 2 0 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 2 0 . 2 1 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 RX 7 MH : 2 6 . 3 7 4 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.3 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.3 4.15.4 5.7 4.43.5 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.1 1.72.3 3.5 4.8 8.4 9.1 5.0 3.7 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.11.6 2.3 3.44.77.37.75.13.9 2.6 2.01.7 1.01.42.1 2.9 4.3 4.64.7 4.43.1 2.4 1.81.5 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.4 2.8 2.1 1.61.4 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.2 0.91.41.9 2.8 3.54.44.6 3.8 3.0 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.01.52.1 3.34.57.6 8.1 4.8 3.3 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.01.52.2 3.5 4.8 8.0 8.35.13.8 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.01.52.1 3.0 4.2 5.35.54.3 3.3 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.4 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.9 3.64.5 4.53.8 3.3 2.5 2.1 1.3 2.2 2.1 2.5 3.6 4.87.57.8 5.0 3.8 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.7 4.05.48.7 9.3 5.6 4.3 3.1 2.6 2.3 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.5 3.6 6.3 8.5 5.3 3.0 2.2 1.7 1.3 0.7 1.1 1.7 2.6 3.6 6.5 8.4 5.3 3.4 2.3 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.7 4.5 5.3 4.1 3.3 2.3 1.7 1.4 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 3.0 3.6 3.9 3.5 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.7 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.2 4.1 4.1 3.7 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.7 3.8 6.2 7.8 5.1 3.2 2.4 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.9 2.9 4.1 7.3 9.9 5.9 3.4 2.5 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.6 4.0 5.3 5.7 4.9 3.6 2.4 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.2 4.2 4.6 4.1 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.2 3.1 3.8 4.2 3.7 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.7 3.6 5.7 7.1 4.9 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.9 4.2 7.6 10.0 6.4 3.7 2.9 2.4 1.5 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.8 5.4 6.7 5.3 4.1 2.9 2.4 1.6 0.7 1.1 1.6 2.4 3.3 4.4 4.6 4.5 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.2 S1 WP WP 1H1-1 EM EM 1EH1-9 (1RP-7) EM EM EM EM EM EM Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 6 SMD6R12940WH Single SMD6R12940WH S1 0.850 1224 15.3 91.814VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 31.8 14 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 17 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 765 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Elec_Level 2_Floor Illuminance Fc 24.31 26.5 20.5 1.19 1.29 Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_Top Illuminance Fc 4.03 23.4 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_1_Top Illuminance Fc 3.02 9.3 0.9 3.36 10.33Level 2_Slope to 3_Top Illuminance Fc 2.78 10.0 0.7 3.97 14.29Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_Top Illuminance Fc 7.22 50.2 0.7 10.31 71.71 Ped_Bridge_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 5.18 6.2 4.1 1.26 1.51 Ped_Bridge_slope down_to building_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 4.04 5.7 2.7 1.50 2.11 Ped_Bridge_slope down_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 5.39 7.9 3.8 1.42 2.08 Ped_Bridge_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 8.33 10.6 5.9 1.41 1.80 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13 Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 20.1 17.8 17.2 18.8 22.7 24.0 22.8 26.8 21.5 26.0 20.0 22.7 17.2 18.8 22.7 24.0 22.8 26.8 21.5 26.0 20.0 22.7 14.8 21.8 19.8 12.4 17.5 17.8 11.5 14.7 15.8 17.0 9.9 2.3 13.6 19.5 20.8 17.6 10.4 4.1 21.1 32.9 34.8 28.0 13.2 4.8 13.9 20.9 22.3 17.9 9.2 3.7 20.2 20.0 18.6 20.7 20.2 19.1 20.5 19.8 18.9 20.5 19.6 18.5 18.5 20.9 17.7 WP WP G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 1   p .   m . LEVEL 2 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.03A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 SCALE = 1/4" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2-6 STAIR ENLARGED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN2 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP 'SEC' '3L1' '3EL1' '3EH1' '3TE1' '3T1' '3H1' 'NAC' '3TLA' '3TLB' EMEM 3EH1-3 ST1 3EH1-3 ST1 3H1-3 ST1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-9 ST1 3EH1-9 X1 EM EM EM 3EH1-9 ST1 3EH1-9 ST1 EM 3EH1-9 RX7 3EH1-3 X1 1H1-1 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-3 X1 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L EM EM EM 3EH1-7 RX7 3EH1-7 RX7 3EH1-7 RX7 EM 3EH1-4 K40E L4 WP WP L2 L2 BEP BEP EM EM L1 L2EM 3EH1-6 ST1 3EH1-9 RX7 EM 3EH1-2 X1 3H1-3 RX7 3H1-3 3H1-3 3H1-3 3H1-3 L6 L6 L6 L6 3H1-1 3H1-1 3H1-1 1 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 4/ 2 9 / 2 0 2 5 8 : 5 6 : 3 9 P M LEVEL 3 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.04 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 3 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATOR INSTALLER L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER.WITH ELEVATORINSTALLER L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TOLEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. NO. DATE REVISION 10/31/2024 50% DD 12/06/2024 100% DD 02/14/2025 50% CD 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 03/21/2025 Bid Set 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #1 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 4 1 . 0 1. 3 1 . 3 1. 4 1 . 5 1. 9 2 . 6 5 . 0 4. 7 1. 9 1. 4 1. 7 1 . 7 1. 9 2 . 2 2 . 8 5 . 3 1 1 . 3 8 . 8 3 . 4 1 . 9 2. 3 2 . 3 2 . 5 3 . 0 4 . 0 6 . 9 1 5 . 3 1 1 . 6 4. 1 2. 2 2. 8 2 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 7 4 . 8 5 . 8 8 . 1 6 . 4 3 . 3 2 . 1 3. 3 3 . 3 3 . 8 4 . 9 7 . 3 6 . 5 5. 1 4 . 1 2. 6 1 . 6 3. 5 3 . 5 4. 1 6. 1 9 . 3 7. 5 4 . 7 3. 4 2 . 3 1. 5 3. 4 3 . 5 4. 1 5 . 1 6. 6 5. 7 4 . 1 3. 2 2 . 1 1. 4 3. 1 3 . 3 3 . 9 4. 4 4. 6 4 . 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 2. 9 3 . 2 3 . 6 4. 1 4 . 5 4. 2 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 2. 6 3 . 0 3 . 7 4 . 3 4 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 8 2 . 7 2 . 0 1. 4 2. 4 2 . 9 3 . 8 5 . 0 6 . 6 5. 7 4. 0 3 . 1 2 . 1 1. 4 2. 3 3 . 0 3 . 8 6 . 1 9 . 3 7. 4 4 . 5 3. 2 2 . 1 1. 4 2. 2 2 . 8 3 . 7 4 . 9 7 . 2 6 . 1 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 1 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 6 3 . 6 4. 1 4. 8 4. 4 3. 8 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 1. 9 2 . 5 3 . 2 4 . 0 4. 7 4 . 4 3. 5 2 . 7 2 . 0 1 . 3 1. 8 2 . 4 3 . 4 4 . 0 4 . 8 4. 4 3. 7 2 . 7 1 . 9 1 . 3 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 3 4 . 6 6 . 9 5 . 9 3 . 9 2 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 2 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 1 5. 4 8. 6 6 . 8 4 . 0 2 . 7 1. 7 1. 2 1. 4 1. 9 2 . 8 3 . 9 5 . 3 4. 5 3. 2 2 . 4 1 . 6 1 . 0 1. 2 1 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 7 3 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 6 1. 7 1. 3 0 . 8 0. 9 1 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 8 2 . 1 2 . 0 1 . 6 1 . 3 0 . 9 0. 7 0 . 9 1. 1 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1. 1 0. 9 0. 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0. 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 1. 1 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 3. 3 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 4 7. 2 3 . 7 2 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 1 9. 8 4 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 9 9. 5 5 . 8 4. 5 3. 9 3 . 9 4 . 3 8. 1 6 . 5 5 . 2 4 . 8 5 . 0 5 . 8 4. 6 5 . 6 6 . 5 7 . 2 9 . 5 9 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 2 7 . 1 3. 0 3 . 8 5 . 0 6 . 1 8 . 9 8 . 9 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 3 6 . 0 2. 4 3 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 9 6 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 9 4. 5 4 . 7 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 0 5 . 2 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 9 3 . 7 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 4 4. 4 4. 9 5 . 0 4. 7 4. 0 3 . 5 3 . 1 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 4. 5 5 . 7 5. 9 4 . 9 4 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 8 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 5 8 . 7 5. 5 4. 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 7 2 . 5 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 3 8 . 4 5 . 6 4. 4 3. 4 2 . 8 1. 7 2 . 5 3 . 6 4. 5 5. 8 5 . 9 5 . 0 4. 4 3. 6 3 . 0 1. 7 2 . 4 3 . 3 4. 4 5 . 4 5. 6 5 . 0 4. 4 3. 9 3 . 5 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 3 5. 5 5. 2 4. 7 4 . 5 4. 2 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 6 4 . 9 7 . 3 7 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 1 4 . 8 5 . 3 1. 4 2 . 2 3 . 3 4. 7 8. 8 9 . 1 5. 7 5. 0 4. 7 6. 4 1. 3 1 . 9 3 . 1 4 . 1 5 . 8 6 . 1 4 . 9 4. 5 4 . 4 4. 9 1. 1 1 . 6 2 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 6 1. 2 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 1. 1 1 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 0. 9 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 1 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 20 . 3 2 4 . 3 2 4 . 2 1 8 . 6 1 . 1 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 27 . 1 3 1 . 1 3 0 . 7 2 4 . 1 3 . 3 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 4 9. 8 1 7 . 9 2 0 . 6 2 0 . 7 1 9 . 9 1 9 . 2 2 1 . 9 2 0 . 5 1 6 . 7 7 . 2 3 . 7 2 . 6 2 . 2 2 . 1 2 . 1 11 . 9 2 2 . 7 2 5 . 6 2 5 . 5 2 5 . 1 2 8 . 8 3 5 . 7 3 3 . 0 2 7 . 3 9 . 8 4 . 8 3 . 5 3 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 9 5. 4 8. 9 1 0 . 6 1 1 . 4 1 2 . 7 1 9 . 6 2 5 . 3 2 4 . 3 2 0 . 5 9 . 5 5 . 8 4. 5 3. 9 3 . 9 4 . 3 2. 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5 . 0 6 . 2 8 . 8 1 0 . 8 1 1 . 4 1 0 . 2 8 . 1 6 . 5 5 . 2 4 . 8 5 . 0 5 . 8 1. 2 1 . 7 2 . 2 2 . 8 3 . 5 4 . 6 5 . 6 6 . 5 7 . 2 9 . 5 9 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 2 7 . 1 3. 0 3 . 8 5 . 0 6 . 1 8 . 9 8 . 9 6 . 1 5 . 3 5 . 3 6 . 0 2. 4 3 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 9 6 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 9 4. 5 4 . 7 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 0 5 . 2 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 9 3 . 7 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 4 4. 4 4. 9 5 . 0 4. 7 4. 0 3 . 5 3 . 1 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 7 4. 5 5 . 7 5. 9 4 . 9 4 . 3 3 . 3 2 . 8 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 5 8 . 7 5. 5 4. 3 3 . 3 2 . 7 1. 7 2 . 5 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 3 8 . 4 5 . 6 4. 4 3. 4 2 . 8 1. 7 2 . 5 3 . 6 4. 5 5. 8 5 . 9 5 . 0 4. 4 3. 6 3 . 0 1. 7 2 . 4 3 . 3 4. 4 5 . 4 5. 6 5 . 0 4. 4 3. 9 3 . 5 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 3 5. 5 5. 2 4. 7 4 . 5 4. 2 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 6 4 . 9 7 . 3 7 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 1 4 . 8 5 . 3 1. 4 2 . 2 3 . 3 4. 7 8. 8 9 . 1 5. 7 5. 0 4. 7 6. 4 1. 3 1 . 9 3 . 1 4 . 1 5 . 8 6 . 1 4 . 9 4. 5 4 . 4 4. 9 1. 1 1 . 6 2 . 2 3 . 1 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 5 3 . 6 1. 2 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 1. 1 1 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 0. 9 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 1 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 ST 1 MH : 3 8 ST 1 MH : 3 8 ST 1 MH : 3 8 3.4 3 . 5 3 . 3 4.0 4.2 4 . 0 5.6 5.7 5 . 4 8.0 8 . 2 7 . 6 K4 0 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 3 0 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 3 0 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 3 0 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 3 3 . 6 2 6 K4 0 MH : 3 6 . 0 0 3 K4 0 MH : 3 6 . 5 4 6 K4 0 MH : 3 8 . 3 6 9 K4 0 MH : 4 1 . 6 8 2 RX 7 MH : 3 0 . 9 1 6 RX 7 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 3 6 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 3 1 . 7 6 6 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.9 3.8 5.35.44.1 3.2 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.01.52.0 3.1 4.37.78.3 4.8 3.3 2.5 1.91.5 1.01.52.1 3.34.46.8 7.34.73.5 2.4 1.81.4 1.01.42.0 2.8 3.94.5 4.74.0 3.0 2.21.71.2 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.7 3.8 3.3 2.7 2.01.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.0 2.4 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.91.41.9 2.8 3.54.5 4.73.9 3.1 2.01.5 1.1 0.91.42.0 3.3 4.67.78.2 4.9 3.4 2.2 1.61.1 1.01.42.1 3.4 4.8 8.1 8.4 5.2 3.9 2.3 1.61.1 0.91.42.1 2.9 4.25.45.64.43.4 2.31.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.7 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.7 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.5 3.6 3.2 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.5 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.2 0.91.41.9 2.8 3.44.5 4.53.8 3.3 2.6 2.2 1.3 1.01.52.1 3.3 4.67.47.8 5.0 3.8 2.8 2.4 2.1 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.7 5.2 8.6 9.2 5.6 4.3 3.1 2.6 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 FIRE PUMP ROOM 3EH1-3 EMEM EM Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Elec_Level 3_Floor Illuminance Fc 5.24 8.2 3.3 1.59 2.48 Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_ Top Illuminance Fc 3.14 15.3 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_2_Top Illuminance Fc 2.89 9.2 0.9 3.21 10.22 Level 2_Slope to 3_7_Top Illuminance Fc 0.27 1.6 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 6.28 35.7 0.7 8.97 51.00 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 3 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 95.4 8 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 247.45612 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 540 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13 Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 4   p .   m . LEVEL 3 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.04A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 3 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP 3EH1-9 X1 3EH1-9 ST1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 3EH1-2 X1 EM 3EH1-3 ST1 3EH1-3 ST1 3H1-3 ST1 EM EM 3EH1-2 X1 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-4 K40E 3H1-3 K40 3H1-3 K40 3EH1-2 X1 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L EM EM EM 3EH1-5 RX7 3EH1-9 RX7 3EH1-9 RX7 EM EM 3EH1-5 RX7 3EH1-5 RX7 EM 3EH1-4 K40E L4 WP WP L2 L2 BEP BEP EM EM L1 L2EM 3EH1-9 ST1 3EH1-2 X1 3H1-3 RX7 3H1-3 L6 3H1-3 L6 L6 3H1-3 L6 3H1-3 3H1-5 3H1-5 3H1-5 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 6   p .   m . LEVEL 4 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.05 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 4 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TOLEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set ST 1 MH : 4 2 . 5 8 9 20 . 3 2 1 . 7 2 0 . 1 23 . 2 2 4 . 8 2 3 . 1 24 . 2 2 5 . 8 2 4 . 3 24 . 2 2 5 . 6 2 4 . 0 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 5 1 . 0 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 9 2 . 7 2 3 . 8 2 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 3 1. 7 1 . 7 1 . 9 2 . 2 2 . 9 5 . 3 1 1 . 0 8 . 5 3 . 4 1 . 9 2. 3 2 . 3 2 . 5 3 . 0 4 . 0 7 . 1 1 5 . 7 1 1 . 6 4 . 1 2 . 2 2. 8 2 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 8 4 . 9 6 . 0 8 . 4 6 . 6 3 . 3 2 . 1 3. 3 3 . 3 3 . 8 4 . 9 7 . 3 6 . 6 5 . 2 4 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 6 3. 5 3 . 6 4 . 1 6 . 2 9 . 3 7 . 6 4 . 8 3 . 5 2 . 3 1 . 5 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 1 5 . 1 6 . 6 5. 7 4. 1 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 3. 2 3 . 4 3 . 9 4. 4 4. 6 4 . 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 0 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 1 4 . 6 4 . 3 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 1 3 . 9 4. 4 4 . 7 4. 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 1 6 . 7 5 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 3 4 . 1 6 . 3 9 . 3 7. 5 4. 6 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 2 7. 4 6. 3 4 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 2 4 . 0 4. 4 5. 1 4 . 6 4 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 1 3 . 3 3 . 7 4. 4 5. 0 4 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 3 3 . 4 4 . 1 4. 4 5. 1 4. 5 3. 8 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 0 5 . 1 7 . 3 6 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 3 3. 4 3 . 5 3 . 9 5 . 8 8 . 9 7 . 0 4 . 1 2 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 2 3. 1 3 . 1 3 . 5 4. 4 5 . 7 4 . 7 3. 3 2 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 1 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 3 0 . 9 2. 0 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 0 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 0 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 7. 5 3. 6 2 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 3 1. 1 12 . 4 5 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 6 15 . 0 6 . 4 3 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 2 14 . 3 6 . 7 4. 4 3. 5 3 . 1 3 . 1 11 . 3 6 . 9 5 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 0 8. 9 7 . 2 5 . 6 5 . 0 4 . 8 5. 4 4. 9 5 . 9 7 . 0 7. 7 10 . 0 9 . 5 6 . 3 5. 4 5. 1 6. 9 3. 3 4. 1 5. 2 6 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 1 6 . 2 5 . 2 5 . 0 5. 5 2. 5 3 . 3 4 . 3 5 . 0 6 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 4 . 4 2. 1 2 . 8 3 . 6 4. 5 5. 1 5. 2 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 7 3 . 4 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 4 4 . 3 4 . 9 4 . 9 4 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 6 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 5 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 4 8 . 5 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 2 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 0 8 . 0 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 1 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 4 5 . 5 4 . 4 3. 6 2 . 6 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 1 5. 0 5 . 0 4 . 2 3 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4. 1 4. 9 4 . 9 4. 1 3. 2 2 . 3 1. 7 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 3 1 . 6 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 5 3. 1 2 . 1 1. 5 1. 2 1 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 8 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 3 0. 9 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 5 1 . 1 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 14 . 4 20 . 6 1 9 . 7 1 6 . 5 7. 5 3. 6 2 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 3 1. 1 29 . 1 4 2 . 0 3 9 . 3 3 3 . 3 1 2 . 4 5 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 6 10 . 1 1 8 . 6 2 1 . 4 2 2 . 3 2 5 . 0 3 6 . 8 5 0 . 8 47 . 4 40 . 5 1 5 . 0 6 . 4 3 . 8 2 . 8 2 . 4 2 . 2 11 . 9 2 2 . 7 2 5 . 9 2 6 . 4 2 7 . 7 3 4 . 4 4 6 . 1 4 2 . 6 3 6 . 5 1 4 . 3 6 . 7 4. 4 3. 5 3 . 1 3 . 1 5. 4 8. 9 1 0 . 8 1 2 . 0 1 3 . 7 2 0 . 0 2 6 . 3 2 5 . 3 2 2 . 0 1 1 . 3 6 . 9 5 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 2 4 . 0 2. 4 3 . 6 4. 5 5 . 5 6. 7 9 . 1 11 . 1 1 1 . 7 10 . 7 8 . 9 7 . 2 5 . 6 5 . 0 4 . 8 5. 4 1. 3 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 8 4 . 9 5 . 9 7 . 0 7. 7 10 . 0 9 . 5 6 . 3 5. 4 5. 1 6. 9 3. 3 4. 1 5. 2 6 . 3 9 . 2 9 . 1 6 . 2 5 . 2 5 . 0 5. 5 2. 5 3 . 3 4 . 3 5 . 0 6 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 4 . 4 2. 1 2 . 8 3 . 6 4. 5 5. 1 5. 2 4 . 8 4 . 2 3 . 7 3 . 4 1. 9 2 . 6 3 . 4 4 . 3 4 . 9 4 . 9 4 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 6 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 5 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 4 8 . 5 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 2 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 0 8 . 0 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 1 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 4 5 . 5 4 . 4 3. 6 2 . 6 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 1 5. 0 5 . 0 4 . 2 3 . 3 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4. 1 4. 9 4 . 9 4. 1 3. 2 2 . 3 1. 7 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 3 1 . 6 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 5 3. 1 2 . 1 1. 5 1. 2 1 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 8 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 3 0. 9 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 5 1 . 1 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 K4 0 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 4 1 . 4 1 6 K4 0 MH : 4 1 . 4 1 6 K4 0 MH : 4 1 . 4 1 6 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 7 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 4 1 . 4 1 6 K4 0 MH : 3 7 . 1 K4 0 MH : 3 8 . 9 1 8 K4 0 MH : 4 0 . 7 6 2 K4 0 MH : 4 2 . 2 8 9 K4 0 MH : 4 4 . 6 8 9 K4 0 MH : 4 7 . 0 6 8 1.01.41.9 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.4 1.01.52.0 2.9 3.8 5.25.44.2 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.01.52.0 3.1 4.3 7.6 8.3 4.9 3.4 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.34.46.7 7.2 4.8 3.6 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.94.54.6 4.0 3.1 2.4 1.9 1.6 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.61.4 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.91.41.9 2.7 3.4 4.24.43.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.9 4.1 6.97.4 4.43.0 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.4 2.0 3.24.47.27.54.6 3.3 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.01.42.0 2.8 3.7 5.0 5.0 3.8 3.1 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 4.04.13.4 2.8 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.1 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.8 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.6 2.1 3.1 4.3 6.8 7.1 4.6 3.3 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.1 1.72.3 3.44.77.9 8.45.13.8 2.8 2.3 1.9 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.6 3.5 6.0 7.8 5.0 2.9 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.7 3.7 6.0 7.6 5.1 3.0 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.4 4.3 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.8 3.8 3.8 3.4 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.0 4.0 4.2 3.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.8 6.0 7.3 5.3 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.0 6.9 8.9 5.9 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.8 5.2 4.7 3.4 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.7 3.6 5.5 6.6 4.9 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.5 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.1 7.0 8.9 6.0 3.7 3.0 2.4 1.6 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.9 6.3 4.9 3.8 2.9 2.5 2.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.3 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.3 FIRE PUMP ROOM 3EH1-13 3EH1-13 3EH1-13 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Elec_Level 4_Floor Illuminance Fc 23.44 25.8 20.1 1.17 1.28 Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_Top Illuminance Fc 3.49 23.8 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_3_Top Illuminance Fc 2.81 8.4 0.9 3.12 9.33 Level 2_Slope to 3_7_1_Top Illuminance Fc 2.70 8.9 0.7 3.86 12.71 Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 6.79 50.8 0.3 22.63 169.33 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 1 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 31.8 12 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 371.18412 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 540 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13 Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 7   p .   m . LEVEL 4 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.05A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 4 -PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP '5EL1' '5EH1' '5L1' '5H1' '5T1' 'SEC' 'NAC' '5TE1' 'NAC' '5TLA' '5TLB' EMEM 5EH1-7 ST1 5EH1-7 ST1 5H1-5 ST1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-5 ST1 5EH1-5 X1 EM 5EH1-7 X1 5EH1-5 ST1 5EH1-5 ST1 EM EM 3H1-3 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-7 X1 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L EM EM EM 5EH1-13 RX7 5EH1-13 RX7 5EH1-13 RX7 5EH1-5 RX7 5EH1-5 RX7 EM EM EM 5EH1-2 K40E L4 WP WP L2 L2 BEP BEP EM EM L1 L2EM 3EH1-9 ST1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-7 RX7 5H1-5 5H1-5 5H1-5 5H1-5 L6 L6L6 L6 EM 5H1-1 5H1-1 5H1-1 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 8   p .   m . LEVEL 5 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.06 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 5 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TOLEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set 0. 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 6 2 . 1 3 . 2 2 4 . 2 2 2 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 3 1. 7 1 . 8 1 . 9 2 . 3 3 . 2 6 . 7 1 2 . 7 7. 4 2. 9 1 . 7 2. 3 2 . 3 2 . 6 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 5 1 6 . 3 9 . 1 3 . 3 2 . 0 2. 8 2 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 8 5 . 0 6 . 3 8 . 1 5. 5 2. 9 1 . 9 3. 3 3 . 3 3 . 8 4 . 9 7. 4 6. 6 5 . 1 3 . 9 2 . 5 1 . 5 3. 5 3 . 6 4 . 1 6 . 2 9 . 3 7. 5 4 . 7 3. 4 2 . 2 1 . 4 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 1 5 . 1 6 . 6 5. 7 4. 1 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 3. 2 3 . 4 3 . 9 4. 4 4. 6 4 . 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 0 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 1 4 . 6 4 . 3 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 1 3 . 9 4. 4 4 . 7 4. 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 1 6 . 7 5 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 3 4 . 1 6 . 2 9 . 3 7. 5 4. 6 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 2 7. 4 6. 3 4 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 2 4 . 0 4. 4 5. 1 4 . 6 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 1 3 . 3 3 . 7 4. 4 5. 0 4 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 3 3 . 4 4 . 1 4. 4 5. 1 4. 5 3. 8 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 0 5 . 1 7 . 3 6 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 3 3. 4 3 . 5 3 . 9 5 . 8 8 . 9 7 . 0 4 . 1 2 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 2 3. 1 3 . 1 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 6 4. 7 3. 3 2 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 1 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 9 2 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 3 0 . 9 2. 0 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 0 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 0 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 1. 2 1. 5 1. 3 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 0 3. 4 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 5 8. 2 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 1 11 . 5 5. 8 4. 1 3. 4 3 . 0 3 . 0 13 . 3 7 . 2 5 . 2 4 . 2 4. 1 4. 0 12 . 7 8 . 1 5 . 9 5. 1 4. 8 5. 4 14 . 8 1 8 . 1 1 9 . 0 1 5 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 0 . 5 6 . 7 5 . 6 5. 1 6. 9 6. 5 8 . 1 9 . 2 9 . 2 1 0 . 7 9 . 8 6 . 5 5. 4 5. 1 5. 5 3. 8 4 . 8 5 . 9 6 . 2 6 . 9 6 . 6 5. 5 5. 0 4. 5 4 . 4 2. 7 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 1 5. 5 5 . 5 5. 0 4 . 3 3 . 8 3 . 5 2. 2 3 . 0 3 . 7 4. 7 5. 1 5 . 1 4. 7 3. 9 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 9 2 . 7 3 . 8 4 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 8 4. 7 4. 0 3 . 0 2 . 4 1. 8 2 . 6 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 5 8 . 5 5 . 3 4 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 2 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 1 8 . 2 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 7 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 4 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 5 5 . 5 4 . 4 3. 6 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 4. 2 3 . 2 2 . 4 1. 7 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 2 4. 1 4. 9 4 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 3 1 . 6 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 2 1. 5 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 7 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 2 1. 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 0 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 21 . 0 2 5 . 3 2 5 . 5 2 0 . 0 1 . 2 1. 5 1. 3 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 0 29 . 2 3 3 . 8 3 3 . 7 2 6 . 5 3 . 4 2 . 8 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 5 10 . 1 1 8 . 7 2 1 . 9 2 3 . 0 2 4 . 7 2 8 . 3 2 9 . 1 2 9 . 1 1 9 . 6 8 . 2 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 5 2 . 2 2 . 1 12 . 0 2 3 . 1 2 6 . 7 2 7 . 6 3 1 . 3 4 3 . 0 4 5 . 9 4 6 . 7 3 0 . 7 11 . 5 5. 8 4. 1 3. 4 3 . 0 3 . 0 5. 6 9 . 3 1 1 . 6 1 3 . 9 2 0 . 4 4 2 . 4 4 8 . 3 4 9 . 8 3 3 . 3 1 3 . 3 7 . 2 5 . 2 4 . 2 4. 1 4. 0 2. 6 3 . 9 5 . 3 7. 5 13 . 5 3 1 . 6 3 7 . 2 3 9 . 1 2 7 . 0 1 2 . 7 8 . 1 5 . 9 5. 1 4. 8 5. 4 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 0 4. 5 7. 9 1 4 . 8 1 8 . 1 1 9 . 0 1 5 . 6 1 2 . 8 1 0 . 5 6 . 7 5 . 6 5. 1 6. 9 6. 5 8 . 1 9 . 2 9 . 2 1 0 . 7 9 . 8 6 . 5 5. 4 5. 1 5. 5 3. 8 4 . 8 5 . 9 6 . 2 6 . 9 6 . 6 5. 5 5. 0 4. 5 4 . 4 2. 7 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 1 5. 5 5 . 5 5. 0 4 . 3 3 . 8 3 . 5 2. 2 3 . 0 3 . 7 4. 7 5. 1 5 . 1 4. 7 3. 9 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 9 2 . 7 3 . 8 4 . 6 5 . 8 5 . 8 4. 7 4. 0 3 . 0 2 . 4 1. 8 2 . 6 3 . 8 5 . 2 8 . 5 8 . 5 5 . 3 4 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 2 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 1 8 . 2 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 7 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 4 3 . 5 4 . 3 5. 5 5 . 5 4 . 4 3. 6 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 1 5 . 1 5 . 1 4. 2 3 . 2 2 . 4 1. 7 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 2 4. 1 4. 9 4 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 3 1 . 6 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 2 1. 5 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 8 2 . 8 3 . 7 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 2 1. 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 0 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 1 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 ST 1 MH : 5 9 . 1 7 ST 1 MH : 5 9 . 1 7 ST 1 MH : 5 3 . 1 1 1 20 . 5 2 1 . 8 2 0 . 2 23 . 4 2 4 . 8 2 3 . 1 24 . 7 2 6 . 0 2 4 . 2 25 . 1 2 5 . 8 2 3 . 6 17 . 3 2 0 . 7 2 2 . 9 2 3 . 7 2 4 . 1 2 4 . 2 2 3 . 8 2 2 . 4 1 9 . 6 20 . 2 2 4 . 4 2 6 . 8 2 7 . 9 2 8 . 1 2 8 . 3 2 8 . 0 2 6 . 3 2 3 . 1 22 . 6 2 7 . 3 3 0 . 4 3 1 . 2 3 1 . 3 3 1 . 5 3 1 . 2 2 9 . 4 2 5 . 8 24 . 2 3 0 . 7 3 3 . 4 3 4 . 3 3 4 . 1 3 4 . 2 3 3 . 9 3 1 . 9 2 7 . 9 28 . 6 3 4 . 5 3 7 . 7 3 7 . 5 3 6 . 9 3 6 . 9 3 7 . 0 3 4 . 7 2 9 . 7 K4 0 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 K4 0 MH : 5 1 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 5 1 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 5 1 . 9 1 6 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 7 . 6 2 4 RX 7 MH : 5 1 . 9 1 6 K4 0 MH : 4 7 . 6 1 7 K4 0 MH : 4 9 . 4 3 6 K4 0 MH : 5 1 . 2 6 8 K4 0 MH : 5 2 . 7 7 4 K4 0 MH : 5 5 . 1 7 4 K4 0 MH : 5 7 . 5 5 7 1.01.41.9 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.4 1.01.52.0 2.9 3.8 5.25.44.2 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.01.52.0 3.1 4.3 7.6 8.3 4.9 3.4 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.34.46.8 7.2 4.8 3.6 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.94.54.6 4.0 3.1 2.4 1.9 1.6 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.61.4 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.91.41.8 2.7 3.4 4.24.43.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.3 0.9 1.4 1.9 2.9 4.1 6.97.4 4.43.0 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.4 2.0 3.24.47.27.54.6 3.3 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.91.42.0 2.8 3.7 5.0 5.0 3.8 3.1 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 4.04.13.4 2.8 2.11.51.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.5 2.01.51.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.8 3.4 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.1 4.3 6.8 7.1 4.6 3.3 2.5 2.0 1.6 1.11.6 2.2 3.44.77.9 8.4 5.2 3.8 2.8 2.3 1.8 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.6 3.5 6.0 7.8 5.0 2.9 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.7 3.7 6.0 7.6 5.1 3.0 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.4 4.3 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.9 3.8 3.8 3.4 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.6 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.0 4.0 4.2 3.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.8 6.0 7.3 5.3 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.0 6.9 8.9 5.9 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.8 5.2 4.7 3.4 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.7 3.6 5.5 6.7 4.8 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.5 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.1 7.0 8.9 6.0 3.7 3.0 2.4 1.6 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.9 6.3 4.9 3.8 2.9 2.5 2.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.3 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.3 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Elec_Level 5_Floor Illuminance Fc 23.60 26.0 20.2 1.17 1.29 Elec_Level 6_Floor Illuminance Fc 28.68 37.7 17.3 1.66 2.18 Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 3.49 24.2 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_4_Top Illuminance Fc 2.80 8.4 0.9 3.11 9.33Level 2_Slope to 3_7_2_Top Illuminance Fc 2.70 8.9 0.7 3.86 12.71 Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 7.51 49.8 0.3 25.03 166.00 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 3 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 95.4 12 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 371.184 12 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 540 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13 Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 3 9   p .   m . LEVEL 5 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.06A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 5 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP 5EH1-1 X1 5H1-5 ST1 5EH1-7 ST1 EM 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-1 X1 5EH1-5 ST1 5EH1-5 X1 EM 5EH1-7 X1 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-2 K40E 5H1-5 K40 5H1-5 K40 5EH1-7 X1 5H1-5 (1RP-20) D8W 5H1-5 (1RP-20) D8W 5EH1-2 (1RP-21) D8WE FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM EM G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L EM EM EM 5EH1-9 RX7 5EH1-5 RX7 5EH1-5 RX7 EM EM 5EH1-9 RX7 5EH1-9 RX7 L4 WP WP L2 L2 BEP BEP EM EM L1 L2EM 5EH1-5 ST1 EM 3EH1-1 ST1 5EH1-1 X1 5H1-5 RX7 5H1-5 5H1-5 5H1-5 L6 L6 L6 EM 5H1-2 5H1-2 5H1-2 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 4 1   p .   m . LEVEL 6 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.07 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 6 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L4 LIGHTING TYPE THROUGH PARKING GARAGE TO BE INSTALLED AS A PENDANT FIXTURE AND MOUNTED TOLEVEL WITH BOTTOM OF TRUSS. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH L6 EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE. CONNECT TO NORMAL AND UNSWITCHED EMERGENCY CIRCUITS AS INDICATED VIA FIXTURE INTEGRATED EMERGENCY POWER CONTROL DEVICE. REFER TO DIAGRAM E0.01/S040. NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set ST 1 MH : 6 3 . 7 ST 1 MH : 6 9 . 6 16. 3 1 9 . 1 2 0 . 2 1 9 . 2 19. 4 2 2 . 9 2 4 . 0 2 3 . 1 21. 8 2 6 . 0 2 7 . 6 2 6 . 8 22. 6 2 8 . 5 2 9 . 9 2 9 . 7 25. 6 3 0 . 2 3 2 . 4 3 2 . 4 20 . 0 2 1 . 3 1 9 . 8 22 . 9 2 4 . 3 2 2 . 7 24 . 0 2 5 . 4 2 3 . 8 24 . 0 2 5 . 1 2 3 . 3 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1 . 2 1 . 4 0 . 2 0 . 0 0 . 4 1 . 0 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 6 2 . 0 2 . 8 2 3 . 5 2 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 3 1. 7 1 . 8 1 . 9 2 . 3 3 . 0 5 . 9 1 1 . 5 7. 7 3. 1 1 . 8 2. 3 2 . 3 2 . 5 3 . 1 4 . 2 7 . 9 1 6 . 5 1 0 . 3 3 . 7 2 . 1 2. 8 2 . 8 3 . 4 3 . 8 5 . 0 6 . 3 8 . 6 6 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 0 3. 3 3 . 3 3 . 8 4 . 9 7 . 3 6 . 7 5 . 2 4 . 1 2 . 6 1 . 6 3. 5 3 . 6 4 . 1 6 . 2 9 . 3 7 . 6 4 . 8 3 . 4 2 . 2 1 . 5 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 1 5 . 1 6 . 6 5 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 3. 2 3 . 4 3 . 9 4. 4 4. 6 4 . 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 0 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 1 4 . 6 4 . 3 3 . 5 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 1 3 . 9 4. 4 4 . 7 4. 3 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 1 6 . 7 5 . 8 4 . 1 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 3 4 . 1 6 . 3 9 . 3 7. 5 4. 6 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 7 3 . 2 4 . 0 5 . 2 7. 4 6. 3 4 . 3 3 . 2 2 . 1 1 . 4 2. 8 3 . 2 4 . 0 4. 4 5. 1 4 . 6 4 . 0 2 . 9 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 1 3 . 3 3 . 7 4. 4 5. 0 4 . 6 3 . 6 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 4 3. 3 3 . 4 4 . 1 4. 4 5. 1 4. 5 3. 8 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 3. 5 3 . 5 4 . 0 5 . 1 7 . 3 6 . 1 4 . 0 3 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 3 3. 4 3 . 5 3 . 9 5 . 8 8 . 9 7 . 0 4 . 1 2 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 2 3. 1 3 . 1 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 6 4. 7 3. 3 2 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 1 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 8 3 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 9 2 . 7 1 . 8 1 . 3 0 . 9 2. 0 2 . 0 2 . 1 2 . 2 2 . 3 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 0 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 6 1 . 5 1 . 4 1 . 2 1 . 0 1. 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 8 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 6. 6 3 . 2 1 . 9 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 11 . 3 4. 7 2. 8 2 . 0 1. 7 1 . 5 14 . 0 5 . 9 3 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 2 13 . 5 6 . 3 4 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 0 10 . 8 6 . 6 5 . 0 4. 1 4 . 1 4. 0 8. 5 6 . 9 5. 4 4. 9 4. 7 5 . 4 4. 6 5. 7 6. 7 7. 4 9. 7 9 . 3 6 . 2 5. 4 5. 0 6 . 8 3. 1 3 . 9 5. 1 6. 2 9 . 1 9 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 9 5. 5 2. 4 3 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 9 6 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 4. 3 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 0 5. 1 4. 7 4. 1 3. 7 3 . 4 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 3 4 . 3 4 . 8 4 . 9 4 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 6 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 4 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 4 8 . 5 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 1 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5 . 0 8 . 0 8 . 1 5. 1 3. 8 2 . 6 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5. 5 5 . 5 4. 3 3 . 6 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 1 4. 1 5. 0 5 . 0 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 4 1. 7 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4. 1 4. 8 4 . 9 4. 1 3. 2 2 . 3 1. 5 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 2 1. 5 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 2 1. 7 2. 8 3 . 7 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 2 0. 9 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 0 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 20 . 3 5. 4 13 . 8 14 . 4 6. 6 3 . 2 1 . 9 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 28 . 4 9 . 8 2 9 . 6 3 0 . 5 1 1 . 3 4. 7 2. 8 2 . 0 1. 7 1 . 5 9. 9 1 8 . 3 2 1 . 0 2 1 . 2 2 0 . 5 2 0 . 2 2 8 . 2 3 9 . 2 3 7 . 6 1 4 . 0 5 . 9 3 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 3 2 . 2 11 . 8 2 2 . 4 2 5 . 4 2 5 . 3 2 5 . 2 2 8 . 7 3 9 . 0 3 8 . 8 3 5 . 0 1 3 . 5 6 . 3 4 . 2 3 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 0 5. 3 8 . 7 1 0 . 5 1 1 . 3 1 2 . 6 1 9 . 1 2 5 . 9 2 4 . 2 2 1 . 2 1 0 . 8 6 . 6 5 . 0 4. 1 4 . 1 4. 0 2. 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5. 1 6. 3 8 . 8 1 0 . 9 1 1 . 3 1 0 . 3 8 . 5 6 . 9 5. 4 4. 9 4. 7 5 . 4 1. 2 1. 7 2. 2 2 . 8 3 . 6 4 . 6 5. 7 6. 7 7. 4 9. 7 9 . 3 6 . 2 5. 4 5. 0 6 . 8 3. 1 3 . 9 5. 1 6. 2 9 . 1 9 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 9 5. 5 2. 4 3 . 1 4 . 2 4 . 9 6 . 0 6 . 1 5 . 2 4 . 8 4. 4 4. 3 2. 0 2 . 7 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 0 5. 1 4. 7 4. 1 3. 7 3 . 4 1. 8 2 . 5 3 . 3 4 . 3 4 . 8 4 . 9 4 . 6 3 . 8 3 . 3 2 . 9 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 6 4. 4 5. 6 5. 7 4. 6 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 4 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5. 1 8. 4 8 . 5 5 . 2 3 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 1 1. 7 2. 4 3 . 7 5 . 0 8 . 0 8 . 1 5. 1 3. 8 2 . 6 1 . 9 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 4 4 . 3 5. 5 5 . 5 4. 3 3 . 6 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 1 4. 1 5. 0 5 . 0 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 4 1. 7 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4. 1 4. 8 4 . 9 4. 1 3. 2 2 . 3 1. 5 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 4 4 . 6 6 . 8 6 . 8 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 2 1. 5 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 1 4. 4 8. 4 8 . 4 4. 4 3. 1 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 2 1. 7 2. 8 3 . 7 5. 4 5 . 4 3. 8 2 . 9 1 . 8 1 . 2 0. 9 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 2 . 9 2 . 9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1. 4 1. 0 1. 0 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 8 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 1. 0 1 . 2 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0. 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 6 2 . 4 1 6 K4 0 MH : 6 2 . 4 1 6 K4 0 MH : 6 2 . 4 1 6 RX 7 MH : 6 2 . 4 1 6 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 RX 7 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 5 8 . 1 0 9 K4 0 MH : 5 9 . 9 2 8 K4 0 MH : 6 1 . 7 5 1 K4 0 MH : 6 3 . 2 9 3 K4 0 MH : 6 5 . 6 8 9 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 0 7 1 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.6 3.5 6.0 7.8 5.0 2.9 2.1 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.7 3.7 6.0 7.6 5.1 3.0 2.2 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.4 3.4 4.3 4.6 3.9 3.2 2.1 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.8 3.8 3.8 3.4 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.5 1.9 1.4 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.0 4.0 4.2 3.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.8 6.0 7.3 5.3 3.1 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.0 6.9 8.9 5.9 3.3 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.6 3.5 4.8 5.2 4.7 3.4 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 3.0 3.8 4.1 3.7 3.3 2.6 1.8 1.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.7 3.6 5.5 6.7 4.9 3.4 2.8 2.3 1.5 0.8 1.3 1.8 2.9 4.1 7.0 8.9 6.0 3.7 3.0 2.4 1.6 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.6 3.5 5.0 6.3 4.9 3.8 2.9 2.5 2.2 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.4 3.3 3.9 4.1 4.1 3.4 2.9 2.5 2.3 1.01.41.9 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.5 2.4 1.01.52.0 2.9 3.8 5.25.44.2 3.4 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.01.52.0 3.1 4.3 7.6 8.3 4.9 3.4 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.34.46.7 7.2 4.8 3.6 2.5 2.1 1.8 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.94.54.6 4.0 3.1 2.4 1.9 1.6 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.3 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.61.4 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.1 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.3 0.91.41.8 2.7 3.4 4.24.43.7 2.9 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.9 4.1 6.97.4 4.43.0 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.0 1.4 2.0 3.24.47.27.54.6 3.3 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.91.42.0 2.8 3.7 5.0 5.0 3.8 3.1 2.2 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.3 4.04.13.4 2.8 2.11.51.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.1 2.5 2.01.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.7 3.3 4.1 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.2 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.1 3.1 4.2 6.8 7.14.53.3 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.11.6 2.2 3.44.77.8 8.45.13.7 2.7 2.3 1.8 FIRE PUMP ROOM EM EM 5H1-1 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Elec_Level 6a_Floor Illuminance Fc 24.89 32.4 16.3 1.53 1.99 Elec_Level 6b_Floor Illuminance Fc 23.05 25.4 19.8 1.16 1.28 Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 3.49 23.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_5_Top Illuminance Fc 2.80 8.4 0.9 3.11 9.33Level 2_Slope to 3_7_3_Top Illuminance Fc 2.70 8.9 0.7 3.86 12.71Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 6.15 39.2 0.3 20.50 130.67 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 2 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 63.6 10 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 309.3212 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8- DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 540 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13 Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 4 3   p .   m . LEVEL 6 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.07A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 6 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set RT 1 MH : 8 3 . 4 7 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 5 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 1. 8 1 . 8 1 . 8 1 . 6 1. 4 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 3. 4 3 . 4 3 . 2 2 . 9 2 . 4 1 . 9 1. 5 1. 2 0 . 9 0 . 7 4. 4 4. 3 4. 1 3. 6 3 . 0 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 5. 2 5 . 3 4 . 9 4 . 2 3 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 0 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 5. 5 5 . 5 5. 6 4. 7 3. 8 2 . 9 2 . 1 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 5. 5 5 . 7 5 . 4 4. 9 3 . 9 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 6 1. 1 0. 8 5. 2 5 . 6 5 . 3 4 . 9 3 . 8 3 . 0 2 . 2 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 5. 5 5 . 7 5 . 4 4. 9 3 . 9 3 . 0 2 . 2 1 . 6 1. 1 0. 8 5. 6 5 . 6 5 . 6 4. 7 3. 8 2 . 9 2 . 1 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 5. 2 5. 4 5. 0 4 . 3 3 . 5 2 . 7 2 . 0 1. 5 1 . 1 0. 8 4. 5 4 . 4 4. 2 3 . 7 3 . 1 2 . 4 1 . 8 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 3. 5 3 . 5 3 . 3 3 . 0 2 . 4 2 . 0 1. 5 1. 2 0 . 9 0 . 7 2. 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 9 1 . 6 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 1. 9 1 . 9 1 . 8 1. 7 1 . 5 1. 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 0 . 5 1. 4 1 . 4 1. 3 1 . 2 1. 1 1. 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 1. 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 1. 2 1 . 2 1. 1 0. 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 1. 7 1 . 7 1. 6 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 8 2. 8 2 . 8 2 . 5 1 . 8 1. 4 1. 0 4. 2 4 . 2 3 . 2 2 . 6 1 . 8 1 . 3 1. 3 1 . 9 3 . 0 4 . 2 7 . 3 7. 4 4. 3 3 . 1 2 . 1 1. 5 1. 4 2. 1 3 . 2 4. 5 7 . 5 7. 6 4 . 6 3 . 4 2 . 3 1 . 8 1. 5 2. 1 3 . 2 3 . 9 5. 1 5. 2 4. 1 3. 5 2 . 5 2 . 0 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 0 3 . 9 4. 5 4. 6 4. 1 3. 4 2 . 8 2 . 2 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 0 4. 1 4. 6 4 . 8 4. 4 3. 6 3 . 1 2 . 7 1. 6 2 . 4 3 . 5 4. 4 5. 6 5 . 8 4 . 9 4. 4 3. 7 3 . 4 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 5 . 2 8 . 6 8 . 8 5 . 9 5 . 0 4. 4 4 . 5 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 8 5 . 3 8 . 5 8 . 7 6 . 3 5 . 6 5. 4 6. 2 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 7 4. 7 6. 1 6 . 5 5 . 9 6 . 0 6 . 5 8 . 3 1. 7 2. 5 3 . 5 4 . 6 5 . 8 6 . 3 6 . 0 6 . 3 7 . 6 1 0 . 8 1. 6 2 . 4 3 . 5 4. 7 5 . 7 6. 2 6 . 3 6 . 8 8 . 5 1 3 . 0 1. 6 2 . 4 3 . 8 5 . 2 7. 7 8. 3 7 . 0 7. 4 9. 3 1 4 . 8 1. 5 2. 3 3 . 5 5 . 0 9 . 3 9 . 9 6 . 9 7 . 2 9 . 3 15 . 1 1. 3 2 . 0 3 . 3 4. 4 6. 3 6 . 9 6 . 2 6 . 9 8 . 8 1 4 . 3 1. 1 1 . 7 2. 4 3 . 4 3 . 9 4. 4 5. 0 5 . 6 7 . 6 1 2 . 2 1. 3 1 . 8 2 . 3 2 . 9 3 . 3 3 . 7 4 . 6 6 . 2 9 . 7 1. 3 1. 7 2. 1 2 . 4 2 . 9 3 . 5 4. 7 6. 9 1. 2 1. 4 1 . 7 2. 1 2 . 6 3 . 3 4. 5 1. 0 1 . 2 1. 4 1. 8 2 . 2 2 . 8 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 K4 0 MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 3.6 6.1 10.1 14.7 18.8 21.8 22.2 21.3 17.7 13.6 9.3 6.1 4.2 8.1 15.8 26.0 33.9 41.0 40.6 39.8 30.9 22.8 12.9 7.0 4.4 9.1 20.1 33.9 43.3 55.6 52.8 53.4 38.3 29.2 15.3 7.4 4.0 8.7 20.2 35.5 45.6 59.0 55.4 56.7 40.2 30.1 14.9 6.8 3.3 6.8 14.7 27.1 36.6 44.6 43.4 42.9 32.7 22.7 11.2 5.5 2.4 4.4 7.9 12.3 16.3 19.0 19.4 18.4 14.9 10.8 6.6 3.9 1.7 2.6 4.0 5.6 6.9 8.0 8.2 7.8 6.6 5.2 3.8 2.7 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.9 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.4 3.0 3.6 4.1 4.4 4.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.6 3.4 4.1 4.8 5.1 4.9 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.8 3.6 4.5 5.2 5.3 5.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.7 4.7 5.2 5.6 5.2 WP WP Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 1.86 5.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_7_4_Top Illuminance Fc 9.03 59.0 0.4 22.58 147.50 Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 3.41 15.1 0.2 17.05 75.50 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 1 TT-D4-740-U-WQ 4 @ 90 Degrees TT-D4-740-U-WQ RT1 0.900 7569 57.6 230.4 3 TT-D8-740-U-WQ Single TT-D8-740-U-WQ D8W 0.850 17562 148.7 446.13 HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-D Single HPG14-www-xx-5W-CP-40L-40K8-DIM1-yyy-zzzz K40 0.850 6075 45 135 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 14 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 433.048 4 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 127.2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_Top Illuminance Fc 18.95 20.1 17.8 1.06 1.13Level_2_Top Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 22.25 26.8 17.2 1.29 1.56 Level_2a_Top Illuminance Fc 17.35 21.8 12.4 1.40 1.76 Level_2b_1_Top Illuminance Fc 15.83 34.8 2.3 6.88 15.13 Stair Tread_4_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.00 20.0 20.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.60 18.6 18.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.70 20.7 20.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.20 20.2 20.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.10 19.1 19.1 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.80 19.8 19.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.90 18.9 18.9 1.00 1.00Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.50 20.5 20.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 19.60 19.6 19.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 18.50 18.5 18.5 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 20.90 20.9 20.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.70 17.7 17.7 1.00 1.00 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 4 4   p .   m . LEVEL 6.5 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.07B PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 6.5 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set PP EMEM 5EH1-7 ST1 5EH1-7 ST1 5EH1-5 ST1 5EH1-5 ST1 EM EM 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5EH1-5 X1 5EH1-7 X1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5H1-7 (5RP7) RT1 5EH1-7 X1 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L EM EM EM 5EH1-11 RX7 5EH1-11 RX7 5EH1-11 RX7 WP WP L2 L2 BEP BEP EM EM L1 L2 5H1-3 5H1-3 5H1-3 LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 4 5   p .   m . LEVEL 7 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN E2.08 PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 7 - PARKING LIGHTING PLAN1 LIGHTING GENERAL SHEET NOTES 1. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL REFLECTED CEILING PLANS FOR ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITHIN A CEILING OR CEILING GRID. FOR AREAS WITHOUT CEILINGS, FIXTURE LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. THE INTENT IS TO ALIGN, CENTER, OR SPACE FIXTURES BETWEEN ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH PAINTING CONTRACTOR FOR PAINTING OF EXPOSED RACEWAY. 2. FIELD VERIFY EXACT FIXTURE LENGTHS FOR CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION FOR COVES AND LINEAR RUNS. PROVIDE CONTINUOUS ILLUMINATION WITH NO MORE THAN A 1" GAP BETWEEN THE END OF THE EDGE OF THE WALL / CEILING AND THE FIXTURE. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR PLACEMENT OF FIXTURES WITHIN MECHANICAL ROOMS. 4. ALL ROOM CONTROLLERS AND/OR POWER PACKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE CEILING SPACE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE ENTRY DOOR TO THE SPACE IT IS CONTROLLING. 5. PROVIDE 0-10V DIMMING CONDUCTORS FOR ALL AREAS AND/OR ROOMS WHERE 0-10V DIMMING IS INDICATED BY THE RELAY PANEL SCHEDULE AND/OR WALL STATION CONTROL SEQUENCE. 6. SUBSCRIPT ADJACENT TO LIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES CONTROLS, PROVIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF RELAY/DIMMERS. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RELAY/DIMMERS FOR DAYLIGHT ZONES AS REQUIRED. LIGHTING SENSOR GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING THE SENSOR MANUFACTURER FOR PROPER PLACEMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF OCCUPANCY SENSORS. 2. EACH ZONE SHALL HAVE COVERAGE BY OCCUPANCY SENSOR SUCH THAT NO BLIND SPOT EXIST. 3. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY COMMISSIONED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S FACTORY AUTHORIZED TECHNICIAN WHO WILL VERIFY ALL ADJUSTMENTS AND SENSOR PLACEMENT TO ENSURE A TROUBLE-FREE INSTALLATION. 4. THE LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF SENSORS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND INDICATE ONLY THE ROOMS WHICH ARE TO BE PROVIDED WITH SENSORS. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SENSORS IF REQUIRED TO PROPERLY COVER THE RESPECTIVE ROOM. 5. PROVIDE DAYLIGHT ZONE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS PER CURRENT IECC REQUIREMENTS. LOCATE DAYLIGHT SENSOR(S) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION AND WHERE REQUIRED WITHIN THE ROOM FOR PROPER COVERAGE. SHEET KEYNOTES L1 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. L2 ELEVATOR PIT LIGHT SWITCH. COORDINATE MOUNTING LOCATION W/ELEVATOR INSTALLER. NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set RT 1 MH : 8 1 . 4 1 7 RT 1 MH : 8 7 . 3 3 9 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 D8 W MH : 6 8 . 1 2 4 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 0 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 5 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 9 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 1. 3 1 . 2 1 . 2 1 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 5 1. 8 1 . 8 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 3 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 2. 6 2 . 5 2 . 4 2 . 1 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 5 3. 7 3 . 6 3 . 3 2 . 9 2 . 3 1 . 8 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 6 4. 9 4 . 8 4. 5 3. 9 3 . 0 2 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 6 6. 2 6 . 2 5 . 6 4. 7 3. 7 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 9 0 . 7 6. 8 7 . 0 6 . 5 5 . 3 4 . 1 2 . 9 2 . 0 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 7 7. 1 7 . 1 6 . 8 5 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 0 0 . 7 6. 5 7 . 0 6 . 5 5. 5 4. 2 3 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 0 0 . 7 7. 0 7 . 1 6 . 8 5 . 6 4 . 2 3 . 0 2 . 1 1 . 5 1 . 0 0 . 7 6. 9 7 . 0 6 . 6 5 . 3 4 . 1 2 . 9 2 . 1 1 . 4 1 . 0 0 . 7 6. 4 6 . 3 5. 7 4. 8 3 . 7 2 . 7 1 . 9 1 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 7 5. 0 4 . 9 4 . 6 4 . 0 3 . 0 2 . 3 1 . 7 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 6 3. 8 3 . 7 3 . 4 2 . 9 2 . 4 1 . 9 1 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 8 0 . 6 2. 6 2 . 6 2 . 5 2 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 5 1 . 2 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 5 1. 9 1 . 9 1 . 7 1 . 6 1 . 4 1 . 1 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 4 1. 3 1 . 3 1 . 2 1 . 1 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0. 8 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0. 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 0 1 . 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 1. 0 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 5 1. 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 0. 7 1 . 0 1 . 2 1. 5 1. 9 2 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 6 0. 7 1 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 1 4 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 4 . 8 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 9 4 . 9 5. 7 6. 2 6 . 2 0. 7 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4 . 3 5. 5 6. 7 7 . 0 6 . 8 0. 8 1. 1 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 5 5. 8 6 . 9 7 . 2 7 . 0 0. 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 8 6 . 6 7. 1 6. 5 0. 8 1. 1 1. 6 2 . 2 3 . 2 4. 5 5. 9 6 . 8 7 . 2 6 . 9 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4 . 3 5 . 6 6 . 8 7 . 0 6 . 9 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 9 5 . 0 5 . 9 6 . 4 6 . 4 0. 7 0 . 9 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 2 4. 1 4. 7 5. 0 5 . 0 0. 6 0 . 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 0 2 . 5 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 8 0. 5 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 1. 5 1. 9 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 0. 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 1. 4 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1 . 8 0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 3 0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0. 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 2 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0. 3 1. 1 0. 7 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 9. 3 1 6 . 4 1 8 . 3 17 . 5 14 . 3 5 . 9 2 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 10 . 9 1 9 . 7 2 1 . 8 2 0 . 7 1 7 . 2 6 . 9 2 . 2 1 . 0 0 . 8 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 4. 6 6 . 9 7 . 9 7. 7 6. 2 3 . 5 1. 7 1. 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 2 1. 6 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 6 2 . 2 1 . 6 1 . 2 1 . 0 1 . 0 1 . 2 1. 4 1 . 5 1 . 7 1 . 7 1 . 7 0. 8 1 . 0 1. 1 1 . 1 0. 9 1 . 0 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 5 1. 8 2 . 1 2 . 4 2 . 5 2 . 5 0. 7 1 . 0 1 . 2 1. 5 1. 9 2 . 4 3 . 0 3 . 4 3 . 6 3 . 6 0. 7 1 . 0 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 1 4 . 0 4 . 6 4 . 8 4 . 8 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 9 4 . 9 5. 7 6. 2 6 . 2 0. 7 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4 . 3 5. 5 6. 7 7 . 0 6 . 8 0. 8 1. 1 1. 6 2 . 3 3 . 2 4. 5 5. 8 6 . 9 7 . 2 7 . 0 0. 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 2 3 . 3 4. 4 5. 8 6 . 6 7. 1 6. 5 0. 8 1. 1 1. 6 2 . 2 3 . 2 4. 5 5. 9 6 . 8 7 . 2 6 . 9 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 5 2. 2 3 . 1 4 . 3 5 . 6 6 . 8 7 . 0 6 . 9 0. 7 1 . 0 1. 4 2. 0 2 . 8 3 . 9 5 . 0 5 . 9 6 . 4 6 . 4 0. 7 0 . 9 1 . 3 1 . 8 2 . 4 3 . 2 4. 1 4. 7 5. 0 5 . 0 0. 6 0 . 8 1. 1 1 . 5 2. 0 2 . 5 3 . 1 3 . 5 3 . 7 3 . 8 0. 5 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 1. 5 1. 9 2 . 2 2 . 5 2 . 6 2 . 6 0. 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 2 1. 4 1. 6 1. 7 1. 8 1 . 8 0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 9 1 . 0 1. 1 1. 2 1 . 2 1 . 3 0. 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 . 9 0 . 9 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0 . 6 0. 3 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0. 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 6. 7 7 . 2 6 . 8 6 . 0 7. 1 7 . 0 7 . 1 5 . 9 6. 5 6 . 8 6 . 3 5 . 3 5. 4 5. 3 5 . 1 4. 5 4. 1 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 4 2. 9 2 . 9 2 . 7 2 . 5 2. 0 2 . 0 1 . 9 1 . 8 1. 4 1 . 4 1 . 3 1 . 3 1. 0 1 . 0 0 . 9 0 . 9 0. 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0 . 7 0. 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 5 0. 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 0 . 4 RX 7 MH : 7 8 . 8 6 6 RX 7 MH : 7 8 . 8 6 6 RX 7 MH : 7 8 . 8 6 6 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.01.42.0 2.94.1 5.46.7 7.2 7.0 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.01.42.1 2.9 4.2 5.67.17.67.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.01.42.0 2.8 4.05.46.7 7.67.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.54.7 5.76.4 6.5 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.74.54.9 5.1 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.21.51.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.91.11.31.5 1.71.9 2.0 2.0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.21.4 1.51.61.7 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.21.5 1.72.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.81.1 1.4 1.72.1 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.0 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.21.52.0 2.6 3.2 3.6 3.8 3.9 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.31.72.3 3.1 3.94.54.9 5.0 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.9 2.6 3.64.5 5.56.1 5.9 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.8 3.8 5.0 6.3 6.4 6.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.01.42.0 2.8 4.0 5.2 6.4 6.9 6.6 0. 8 2.7 6.1 14.6 27.8 37.7 46.5 44.9 44.6 33.4 22.7 10.3 4.5 2.2 4.2 8.0 13.1 17.5 20.7 20.9 19.8 15.7 11.0 6.3 3.4 2.0 3.2 4.8 6.7 8.4 9.8 10.2 9.9 8.8 7.3 5.7 4.5 1.5 2.1 2.9 3.6 4.4 5.0 5.3 5.4 5.1 4.6 4.0 3.5 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 2.9 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.7 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.3 3.3 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.8 3.4 3.8 4.0 4.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.5 3.3 4.1 4.7 5.1 5.2 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.8 4.7 5.6 6.3 6.1 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.0 4.0 5.2 6.4 6.6 6.7 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.0 4.1 5.4 6.5 6.9 6.7 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Level 2_Lower Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 1.96 7.1 0.0 N.A. N.A. Level 2_Slope to 3_6_Top Illuminance Fc 2.22 7.7 0.4 5.55 19.25 Level 2_Upper Landing to 3_1_1_ 1_1_1_1_Top Illuminance Fc 2.72 21.8 0.2 13.60 109.00 Level 7_to 8_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 3.10 7.2 0.4 7.75 18.00 Ramp to level 6 and a half_Top Illuminance Fc 5.14 46.5 0.5 10.28 93.00 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 2 TT-D4-740-U-WQ 4 @ 90 Degrees TT-D4-740-U-WQ RT1 0.900 7569 57.6 460.8 3 RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-P-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 92.7963 TT-D8-740-U-WQ Single TT-D8-740-U-WQ D8W 0.850 17562 148.7 446.1 Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description Tag LLF Luminaire Lumens Luminaire Watts Total Watts 3 RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 Single RXT-R-D-FF-07L40-4 RX7 0.850 2869 30.932 92.796 3 4VRVT1-SL3C3-MID-POWER-4000K-Single 4APVTLD-SL3C3 MID POWER 4000K 277V ST1 0.850 4614 31.8 95.4 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Landing _2_1_3_Top Illuminance Fc 12.55 13.4 11.7 1.07 1.15 Level_2_1_3_Top Illuminance Fc 19.42 23.4 14.0 1.39 1.67 Level_2a_1_3_Top Illuminance Fc 13.68 17.2 10.4 1.32 1.65 Level_2b_3_Top Illuminance Fc 2.89 10.5 0.3 9.63 35.00 Stair Tread_4_1_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 16.40 16.4 16.4 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_2_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.80 15.8 15.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_3_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.00 15.0 15.0 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_4_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.90 13.9 13.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_5_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.80 13.8 13.8 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_1_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.40 13.4 13.4 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_2_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.40 14.4 14.4 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_3_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.70 14.7 14.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_4_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.40 15.4 15.4 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_5_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.60 17.6 17.6 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_6_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 17.20 17.2 17.2 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_7_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.90 15.9 15.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_8_1_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 15.70 15.7 15.7 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_6_9_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 13.90 13.9 13.9 1.00 1.00 Stair Tread_4_7_3_Top_1 Illuminance Fc 14.00 14.0 14.0 1.00 1.00 11.7 13.4 16.7 17.2 22.1 22.0 21.3 23.4 18.5 21.7 14.0 17.3 17.2 16.2 14.5 12.3 11.5 10.4 7.6 7.1 8.0 10.5 5.6 0.3 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.9 2.8 0.8 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 16.4 15.8 15.0 13.9 13.8 13.4 14.4 14.7 15.4 17.6 17.2 15.9 15.7 13.9 14.0 G.P G.D G.E G.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.5 G.5.9 G.7 G.9G.6 G.7.9 G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.K G.L LUKE JUSTIN No. 6598067-2202 GINEER ONA OFESSI R UTAHTEOFSTA P L EN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BY REVIEWED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL ISSUE Copyright © 2022 W ALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTANT LOGO: M09-21011-00 ELECTRICAL PROJECT NAME IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 301 SOUTH TEMPLE SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 (801)-325-2000 04/07/2025 8/ 0 4 / 2 0 2 5 5 : 0 3 : 4 7   p .   m . LEVEL 7 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E2.08A PHASE 2 PERMIT SET 03/07/2025 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 MST CC AM DE L T A C E N T E R G A R A G E PA R K I N G S T R U C T U R E 61 S 4 0 0 W . SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 SCALE = 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 7 - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1 SCALE = 1/4" = 1'-0" LEVEL 7 STAIR ENLARGED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN2 NO. DATE REVISION 1 10/31/2024 50% DD 2 12/06/2024 100% DD 3 02/14/2025 50% CD 1.1 03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set 4 03/21/2025 Bid Set 1.2 04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set Addressing Planning Commission Recommendations: 1. Additional visual interest be incorporated along the retaining walls at the base of the structure’s street facing facades and identified in the plan set prior to adoption of the development agreement. a. SEG is committed to working with Salt Lake City to enhance pedestrian experience along 400 West and 100 South, including the potential for art activations and increased landscaping as the site plan for the entire block is finalized in future years. Given the next two years of construction and the master planning of the entire site, SEG believes that it makes more sense to address these issues in detail over that process. 2. The applicant replaced the proposed woven wire mesh screening material on the street facing facades of the loading area with screening materials similar to or consistent with the perforated aluminum panels proposed for the upper levels of the structure prior to adoption of the development agreement. a. Our mechanical engineers have approved the potential of different materials to be substituted for the wire mesh. We have included options for that area within Exhibit B. Due to safety and code regulations (since the loading area will often have air quality issues due to running engines) the façade materials in that area have to be more open to allow ventilation. If the ratio of solids to voids in this area was significantly modified to match the materials on the façade itself that would require more air handling which would result in higher energy use, higher costs and, also, create a noise issue as the higher pressure air escapes from the materials. To address the concern expressed by the Planning Commission about lights from vehicles in this loading area potentially impacting neighboring properties – this area is significantly below grade so that lighting will not be an issue. In fact, the below grade area will be used almost exactly the same as it now is and there have been no major lighting issues. 3. The applicant includes bicycle parking on the property in close proximity to the primary entrances of the arena. a. SEG will work to include more bicycle parking in close proximity to the primary entrances of the arena as the site plan for the entire block is finalized in future years. Wherever we might show that bicycle parking at this time would be subject to change as the entire site and area are planned. 4. Final details regarding site plan requirements be provided in the plan set prior to adoption of the Development Agreement a. SEG has provided Salt Lake City with the most up to date plan set and will continue to update in response to building and other city department permit comments. 5. The applicant works with staff to create a larger landscape buffer as possible. a. SEG is working with the civil engineers and architects to see if there is a way to create a larger landscape buffer along 100 South and 400 West. If possible, SEG will work with SLC Building and Planning Department and use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize the landscape buffer along the property. R A M P DETAIL KEY SHEET #DETAIL # ELEVATION KEY SHEET # ELEVATION # WALL SECTION KEYDETAIL #SHEET #BUILDING SECTION KEYDETAIL #SHEET # NORTH ARROWTRUE NORTH REVISION CLOUD GRID DESIGNATION TAG KEY ##XX100Name100#'-#" WALL TAG (PARTITION TYPE)KEYED NOTEACCESSORY TAGFINISH TAGSPECIALTY EQUIPMENT TAGDOOR TAGROOM TAGCEILING HEIGHT TAG 1A1.01SIM #####SIM SPOT ELEVATION100.00 REFERENCEOBJECT U2A* A1011Ref1Ref1Ref1RefLEVEL KEY PRECAST PANEL TAGINTERIOR ELEVATION TAG 11A3-0 ElevationLevel #####SIM #####SIM NREFERENCETRUENORTHREFERENCE NORTH TOP OF STRUCTURAL SLAB ELEVATION 100.17TOP OF STRUCTURAL SLAB ELEVATION100.00TOP OF FINISHED ELEVATIONMATERIAL LEGEND EARTHGRAVEL / BALLASTSTEEL CONCRETE RIGID INSUL.BATT INSUL. FIRE SAFING MARBLE / GRANITE FINISH LUMBERPLYWOOD WOOD BLOCKING SHIM CUT STONE / PRE-CASTCONCRETE MASONRY UNITS BRICKALUMINUMPLASTERGYPSUM BOARD GLAZING UNDISTURBED EARTH METALSTUD VICINITY MAP EXPANDED VIEW NREFERENCETRUENORTH ABBREVIATIONS APPLICABLE CODE LIST WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS LOCATION MAP NREFERENCETRUENORTH DESCRIPTION OF SCOPE OF WORK H HIGHHBHOSE BIBHCHOLLOW COREHDCP HANDICAPHDHEADHDWHARDWAREHMHOLLOW METALHORIZ HORIZONTALHPHIGH POINTHGTHEIGHTHTRHEATERHWHHOT WATER HEATERHVAC HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONINGICEICE MACHINEIDINSIDE DIAMETERININCHINCLINCLUDE (ED) (ING)INFO INFORMATIONINSUL INSULATIONINTINTERIORJANJANITORJBJUNCTION BOXJSTJOISTJTJOINTLLENGTHLABLABORATORYLAMLAMINATELAVLAVATORYLBPOUNDLFLINEAR FEETLHLEFT HANDLKRLOCKERLPLOW POINTMMETERMAMARBLE MAS MASONRYMATL MATERIALMAXMAXIMUMMBMARKER BOARD OR MOP BASINMDFMEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARDMECH MECHANICAL MFR MANUFACTURERMHMANHOLEMICMICROWAVEMINMINIMUMMISCMISCELLANEOUSMMMILLIMETERMOMASONRY OPENINGMTDMOUNTEDMTLMETALNNORTHNICNOT IN CONTRACTNONUMBERNOMNOMINALNTSNOT TO SCALEOAOVERALLOCON CENTERODOUTSIDE DIAMETEROHOVERHEADOHDOVERHEAD DOOROPNG OPENINGOPPOPPOSITEORDOVERFLOW ROOF DRAINOPTOPTIONALORIG ORIGINALOZOUNCEPARTN PARTITIONPCPRECASTPERF PERFORATEDPJPANEL JOINTPLPLATEPLAS PLASTERP LAM PLASTIC LAMINATEPLGPLUMBINGPLYWD PLYWOODPNLPANELPRPAIRPREFAB PREFABRICATEDPRELIM PRELIMINARYPROJ PROJECT PRS PROJECTION SCREENPSFPOUNDS PER SQUARE FOOTPSIPOUNDS PER SQUARE INCHPTPAINTPTDPAPER TOWEL DISPENSERQTQUARRY TILEQTRQUARTERRRISERR/A RETURN AIRRADRADIUSRBRESILIENT BASERDROOF DRAINREFREFERENCEREINF REINFORCED (ING)RF RESILIENT FLOORINGRFGREFRIGERATOR A/CAIR CONDITIONINGACTACOUSTICAL CEILING TILEAFFABOVE FINISH FLOORAHUAIR HANDLING UNITALUM ALUMINUMALTALTERNATEAMTAMOUNTAPACCESS PANELAPPROX APPROXIMATEARCH ARCHITECTURALATMAUTOMATED TELLER MACHINEAVAUDIO VISUALBDBOARDBLDG BUILDINGBLKBLOCKINGBMBEAM OR BENCHMARKBMDBOTTOM OF METAL DECKBOBOTTOM OFBOSBOTTOM OF STAIRSBRGBEARINGBSMT BASEMENTCAB(S) CABINET(S)CB CORNER BEANCGCORNER GUARDCICAST IRONCJCONTROL JOINTCLGCEILINGCLCLOSETCLRCLEARCMCENTIMETERCMPCOMPOSITE METAL PANELCMUCONCRETE MASONRY UNITCOCLEAN OUTCOLCOLUMNCONC CONCRETECONST CONSTRUCTIONCONT CONTINUOUS CONTR CONTRACTORCOPY COPY/PRINT MACHINECPTCARPETCTCERAMIC TILECTRCENTERCTSK COUNTERSINKCWCURTAIN WALLDBLDOUBLEDEGDEGREEDEPT DEPARTMENTDTLDETAILDIADIAMETERDIAGDIAGONALDIMDIMENSIONDNDOWNDRDOORDSDOWNSPOUTDWDISHWASHERDWG(S) DRAWING(S)E EASTEAEACHEIFSEXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH SYSTEMEJEXPANSION JOINTELELEVATIONELEC ELECTRICALELEV ELEVATORENCL ENCLOSUREENGR ENGINEEREQEQUALEQPEQUIPMENTESMT EASEMENTEWCELECTRIC WATER COOLEREXHEXHAUSTEXIST EXISTING EXPEXPANSIONEXTEXTERIORFAFIRE ALARMFCUFAN COIL UNITFDFLOOR DRAINFDNFOUNDATIONFEFIRE EXTINGUISHERFECFIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETFFFINISH FLOORFHCFIRE HOSE CABINETFINFINISH FL FLOW LINEFLRFLOORFTFEETFTGFOOTINGFUTFUTUREFVFIELD VERIFYFWCFABRIC WALL COVERINGGAGAUGEGALV GALVANIZEDGBGRAB BARGCGENERAL CONTRACTORGENGENERATORGFBGROUND FACE BLOCKGFRC GLASS FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETEGFRG GLASS FIBER REINFORCED GYPSUMGLGLASSGNDGROUNDGYPGYPSUM REQREQUIRED RET RETAINING REV REVISIONRHRIGHT HANDRMROOMROROUGH OPENINGRTUROOF TOP UNITRVROOF VENTSSOUTHS/A SUPPLY AIRSABSOUND ATTENUATION BLANKETSANSANITARY SD SMOKE DETECTORSFSQUARE FEETSHRSHOWERSHTSHEETSIMSIMILARSMSQUARE METERSNRSANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLESPEC(S) SPECIFICATION(S)SPKR SPEAKERSQSQUARESSSTAINLESS STEELSTSTREETSTDSTANDARDSTLSTEELSTOR STORAGESTRUCT STRUCTURESUSP SUSPENDEDSYMSYMMETRICALSYSSYSTEMTTREAD / TEMPEREDT&G TONGUE & GROOVETBTACKBOARDTBDTO BE DETERMINEDTELETELEPHONETELECOM TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONSTEMP TEMPORARYTRZTERRAZZOTHKTHICKTHRU THROUGHTOTOP OFTPHTOILET PAPER HOLDERTSSTOP STRUCTURAL SLABTSTLTOP OF STEELTUTILT-UPTVTELEVISIONTWTOP OF WALLTYPTYPICALUHUNIT HEATERUNFIN UNFINISHEDULUNDERWRITER'S LABORATORYUONUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDVVENDING MACHINEVBVAPOR BARRIERVENT VENTILATIONVERT VERTICALVEST VESTIBULEVWCVINYL WALL COVERINGWWESTW/WITHW/O WITHOUTWCWATER CLOSETWDWOODWGWALL GUARDWPWATERPROOFINGWPTWORKING POINTWSCT WAINSCOTWTWEIGHTWWF WELDED WIRE FABRICXMFR TRANSFORMER PARKING & AREA SUMMARY PARKING SPACE LEGENDADA = STANDARD ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACEEVS = ELECTRIC VEHICLE SPACE (FUTURE EVCS)EVCS = ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONCAV = CLEAN AIR / VAN POOL / EV SPACESTD = STANDARD PARKING SPACECOMP = COMPACT PARKING SPACE GRAPHIC SYMBOLS MATERIAL PATTERN SYMBOLS REQUIRED PARKING REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING PROJECT SITE PROJECT SITE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ZONING / CONSTRUCTION TYPE / USE GROUP / FIRE PROTECTION 7A6B5B4B3B2B1B 7B 6A5A4A3A2A1A1CENT/EXTRAMP LOADING LOADING LOADING LEGAL DESCRIPTION & PARCEL NUMBERLegal Description:BEG AT THE NE COR OF BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR; S 0¿13'31" W 660.36 FT; N 89¿46'55" W 660.70 FT; N 0¿14'38" E 390.25 FT; N 45¿16'17" E 382.34 FT; S 89¿46'56" E 390.01 FT TO BEG. (BEING PT OF LOTS 4 & 5 & ALL OF LOTS 1 THRU 3 & 6 THU 8, BLK 79, PLAT A, SLC SUR). 9.176 AC M OR L. 5918-838 6175-1443 6227-1454,1482Parcel Record 15011270172000Owner REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITYAddress 301 W SOUTHTEMPLE STTotal Acreage 9.18Tax Class Id 50BProperty Type 953Tax District 01C% Exempt 100Exempt Type TMunicipal Zone D-4MLS Number 5 5 500 ft0 ft 5 EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM"UPON SIGNIFICANT COMPLETION OF THE STRUCTURE, TESTING OF ERRCS SIGNAL STRENGTH SHALL BE ARRANGED AND PERFORMED WITH THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU. IF SIGNAL STRENGTH IS DETERMINED TO BE INSUFFICIENT, A DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OWNER’S INTEGRATOR VIA DEFERRED SUBMITTAL." SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 8/28/2025 2 : 2 9 : 4 3 P M GENERAL SHEET A0.01 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 400 W . SALT LAK E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 TD/DA/YC SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SALT L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION: SALT LAKE CITY, UT2021 UTAH FIRE CODE (UFC)2019 UTAH FIRE ALARM CODE2019 UTAH SPRINKLER CODE2019 NFPA 14 - STANDPIPES2019 NFPA 13 - SPRINKLER SYSTEMS2019 NFPA 72 - NATIONAL FIRE ALARMICC A117.1-092021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, INCLUDING APPENDICES C AND J, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL2020 EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL2021 EDITION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE, ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL2017 UTAH ACCESSIBILITY CODE2010 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN2025 SALT LAKE CITY MUNICIPAL CODE ZONE:D-4USE:PARKING, COMMERCIALOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION :BASEMENT LEVEL IS CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING FROM THE OPEN PARKING GARAGE LEVELS ABOVE PER IBC 510.3 GROUP S-2 ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE WITH GROUP S-2 OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVETYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IIB FIRE PROTECTION:FIRE STANDPIPE + SPRINKLER SYSTEM BUILDING FOOTPRINT SIZE:188'-10" X 122'-7"NUMBER OF TIERS PROVIDED: 9 TIERS / 7 STORIESBUILDING TIERS ALLOWED: 9 TIERS PER IBC 406.5.5 AREA AND HEIGHT INCREASESALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 600'-0" PER D-4 ZONE HEIGHT LIMITSPER IBC HEIGHT OF OPEN PARKING BUILDING MEASURED FROM GRADE PLANE TO HIGHEST FLOOR TIER 9 = 81'-1" = 8.96 TIERS ROUNDED UP TO 9 TIERS PER IBC SECTION 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE.BUILDING HEIGHT: PER SLC MUNICIPAL CODE 80'-7" (PER SECTION 12-1.18. BUILDING HEIGHT. “BUILDING HEIGHT” SHALL MEAN THE VERTICAL DISTANCE MEASURED FROM THE AVERAGE LEVEL OF THE HIGHEST AND LOWEST POINT OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE COVERED BY THE BUILDING TO THE CEILING OF THE UPPERMOST STORY.)VENTILATION: NATURAL VENTILATION ON OPEN PARKING LEVELS. MECHANICAL VENTILATION ON BASEMENT LEVELFLOOR AREA ALLOWED: TYPE IIB = 50,000 S.F. MAX. PER OPEN TIER AND 104,000 S.F. MAX. PER ENCLOSED STORY.ALLOWABLE AREA WITH TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION PER IBC 510.3 (1) OF THE BUILDING SUCH THAT THE SUM OF RATIONS FOR EACH SEPARATE OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT EQUAL 1.BASEMENT ENCLOSED PARKING BUILDING AREA RATIO: 31,255 SF AREA PROVIDED /104,000 ALLOWED MAX. 1 STORY MAX ABOVE GRADE PLAN EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PER TABLE 506.2 = 0.31 RATIOABOVE GRADE OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE BUILDING AREA RATIO : 29,839 PROVIDED (LARGEST TIER 1 MEASURED FROM LOWEST POINT OF TIER TO 9'-6" ABOVE AS DEFINED BY 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE )/ 50,000 SF PER TABLE 406.5.4 = 0.59 RATIOSUM OF RATIOS OF BUILDING 0.31+0.59=0.90 RATIO WHICH IS LESS THAN 1FLOOR AREA/PER LEVEL: 23,276 S.F. TYPICAL GRAND TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 209,227 S.F.OCCUPANT LOAD PER LEVEL: 117 PER LEVEL TYPICALEXIT STAIRS REQUIRED: 2 EXIT STAIRS PROVIDED:2STAIR WIDTH REQUIRED PER STAIR: 18"STAIR WIDTH PROVIDED PER STAIR: 54" TRAVEL DISTANCE: 400' MAX. TO STAIR PER IBC TABLE 1017.2 (FULLY SPRINKLERED WITHOUT VOICE ALARM SYSTEM) THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A NEW 9 TIER/ 7 LEVEL OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE ABOVE ONE-TIER/ ONE STORY ENCLOSED COMMERCIAL VEHICLE LOADING AND AN ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. SITE IMPROVEMENTS WITH A LIMITED EXTENSION FROM THE EXTERIOR PERIMETER OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE INCLUDE ON-SITE DRIVEWAY ACCESS, LANDSCAPE, HARDSCAPE, UTILITY LINES.THE PARKING FACILITY IS DESIGNED WITH STEEL COLUMNS AND BEAMS AND CONCRETE-FILLED METAL DECK ELEVATED FLOORS OF TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION.SERVING ALL SEVEN ABOVE GRADE LEVELS ARE TWO ELEVATORS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER, TWO OPEN STAIRS AT THE NORTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNERS. THE BASEMENT LEVEL IS SERVED BY A NEW E;EVATOR CONNECTING TO LEVEL 1, AND AN EXISTING STAIR WITHIN THE ARENA AND A NEW STAIR FROM BASEMENT FOR LEVEL 1.VEHICULAR ACCESS IS PROVIDED AT LEVEL 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS PROVIDED AT ALL LEVELS. EXCEPT BASEMENT LEVEL CONTRACTOR AND THEIR ENGINEER SHALL PREPARE DETAIL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS FOR THE DEFERRED ITEMS LISTED BELOW. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF UTAH.THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL BE STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE REGISTERED ENGINEER AND PRESENTED TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD (AOR) / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD (SEOR) FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTING THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION (AHJ) FOR APPROVAL AND PERMIT.INSTALLATION OF DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SHALL NOT BE STARTED UNTIL THEY ARE ACCEPTED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD (AOR) / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD (SEOR) AND APPROVED/ PERMITTED BY AHJ.CONTRACTOR SHALL ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR REVIEW BY AOR/ SEOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, APPROVAL, PERMITTED BY AHJ.DEFERRED ITEMS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:1. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM2. AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM SYSTEM3. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (INCLUDING CCTV)4. BARRIER CABLES5. STEEL STAIRS & GUARDRAILS6. ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS7. BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACES8. PLUMBING LINES AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUPPORT, BRACING, ANCHORAGES AND PROTECTION9. PREFABRICATED GUARDBOOTH10. PARKING CONTROL EQUIPMENT11. METAL STUD/ COLD-FORMED FRAMING12. GENERATORS13. PARKING STRUCTURE ENTRY PORTAL14. METAL FABRICATIONS, RAILINGS, AND GRATINGS15. PILE LOAD TEST FRAMENOTE:INSTALLATION OF ELEVATOR GUIDE RAILS AND BRACKETS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH:1. ASME 17.1/ CSA B44, ASME 17.1/ CSA B44.72. FOR ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL DEFERRED SUBMITTALS SEE SHT S0-10, PART XI SUBMITTAL, B2 TOTAL CODE REQUIRED PARKING = NONE REQUIREDPROVIDED PARKING SPACESPARKING STRUCTURE (THIS PERMIT) = 448 SPACESGRAND TOTAL = 448 SPACES *** Whithin the 31 spaces there are 25 compact parking spaces (Pending the Master Development Agreement)**Within the 34 spaces there are 14 compact parking spaces (Pending the Master Development Agreement)* Within the 10 total ADA spaces there are 8 standard ADA and 2 Van ADATotal43810 448 0 165,238 34,227 9,763 210,085 369Total40141 0 16,119 0 0 16,119 393 7B 9 0 9 0 4,015 0 0 4,015 446 7A ***31 1 32 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 378Level 7 Total 66 1 67 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 348 6B **34 0 34 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 329 6A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367Level 6 Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 5B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 5A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367Level 5 Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 4B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 4A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367Level 4Total 67 1 68 0 23,276 0 0 23,276 342 3B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 3A 32 1 33 0 12,104 0 0 12,104 367Level 3 Total 65 1 66 0 23,276 0 0 24,134 353 2B 35 0 35 0 11,172 0 0 11,172 319 2A 30 1 31 0 12,104 0 0 12,962 391Level 2Total 66 4 70 0 28,753 0 9,763 38,515 411 1C 7 0 7 4,544 4,544 649 1B 35 0 35 11,213 0 5,353 16,566 320 1A 24 4 28 12,996 0 4,410 17,406 464Level 1Level B1 0 0 0 0 0 34,227 34,227 0Slab onGradeElevatedSlabSlab onGradeElevatedSlabStandard Spaces ADA Spaces*Parking Area Standard TotalParking Area (sqft) Non-Parking Area (sqft)Parking andNon-ParkingTotal AreaEfficiency(Parking Area/ ParkingSpaces) PARKING SUMMARY DELTA CENTER GARAGE NO BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED SINCE THE PROJECT IS DEFINED AS A GARAGE AND AN ACCESSORY USE AS DEFINE BY SLC MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS: 21A.62.040: DEFINITIONS OF TERMS: GARAGE:AN ACCESSORY BUILDING OR PORTION OF A BUILDING DESIGNED OR USED FOR THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES USED BY THE OCCUPANTS OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING21A44.040: REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING (E) NOTE 6ACCESSORY AND TEMPORPAY USES: NO BICYCLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED FORACCESSORY OF TEMPORARY USES. NOTE:PARKING TIER SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOWN IN THIS CHART DIFFER FROM UBC 406.5.4.1 SINGLE USE, AND ARE INSEAD BASED ON PARKING BAYS AND STORY FOOTPRINT NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #15 08/01/2025 Bulletin #5 1 1 5 5 5 jb jb s sdsdss irir sdfo e s ws ee eee s irir e um s w S T E M P L E S T N 4 0 0 W 300 w 1 0 0 S 122'-10 1/2" DELTA CENTERBUILDING TYPE IBFULLY SPRINKLERED[NIC] PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE8 TIERS / 7 STORIESTYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IIBOCCUPANCY CLASS: S-2 FULLY SPRINKLERED ENTRANCE DN EXIT 8.33%DN NEW PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EXISTING TRUCK EXIT NEW GUARD BOOTH STORAGE ROOM (NIC) STORAGE ROOM (NIC) OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW LOADING DOCK COVER EXISTING TRUCK ENTRANCE OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW A8.011 NORTHWEST PLAZA [NIC] SOUTHEAST PLAZA [NIC] CORNER SIDE YARD EXISTING SIDE W A L K EXITENTRY NORTHEAST PLAZA [NIC] PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE O F S T R E E T 41'-7" Refer to Civil Sheet C 2 . 0 1 f o r C u r b C u t D i m e n s i o n s 101'-2 1/2" EXISTING STAIR TO REMAIN (NIC) 4'-9"PROPERTY L I N E PROPERTY L I N E FRONT YARD 29'-6" 189'-6" 51'-4" 57'-0 1/2" 4'-4"EXISTING SIDEWALK RETAINING WALL - REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS SEE SEPARATE PERMIT OF ARENA PROJECT FOR CONTINUATION OF ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AND EGRESS TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY LINE PROPER T Y L I N E PROPERT Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE A8.021Sim SEE SEPARATE PERMIT OF ARENA PROJECT FOR CONTINUATION OF ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AND EGRESS TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW FOR PAVEMENT FINISH AND MATERIALS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS 1 1 5'-0" 3'-0"4'-0"4'-0"6'-1"24"w x24"dx48h Comm. Cabinet24"wx 31"dx39"h Transformer GUARDBOOTH SEE A8.01 FOR DETAILS GUARDBOOTH RESTROOM PATH296'-0" 3 3 3 2'-6"6'-7 3/4"76.62' 76.62'76.62' 76.50' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62' 76.62'TOW76.95'ToW 76.50' 75.98' 58.20'59.00'60.00' 62.50' 65.00' CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE RAMP RETAINING WALL. FINISH TO MATCH ARENA'S EXISTING CONCRETE WALL. TOP OF CONC. WALL FINISH ELEVATIONS PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK BUILDING FOOTPRINT 60.73'ToW 60.90'ToW 61.10'ToW 61.10'ToW61.10'ToW TOP OF PLANTER WALL ELEVATION CAST IN PLACE PLANTER WALL. FINISH TO MATCH EXISTING ARENA CONCRETE WALL GUARDBOOTH RESTROOM PATH296'-0" GUARDBOOTH RESTROOM PATH296'-0"1'-8 1/2" DISTANCE OF RETAINING WALL TO PROPERTY LINE.DIMENSION OF LANDSCAPE BED ADJACENT TO ACCESS RAMP END OF RETAINING WALL FACING STREET CORNER OF THE GUARD BOOTH RETAINING WALL 1'-8 1/2" 55.07Sidewalk 55.63Sidewalk 10 1/2" 56.09Sidewalk 55.07Sidewalk FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES: 1. THE REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW IN ACCORDANCE WITH UFC APPENDIX B, FOR A TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION ACROSS 412,995 SQ.FT IS 8,000 GPM AT 20-PSI FOR 4-HOURS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE B105.2 THE FIRE-FLOW CAN BE REDUCED TO 25% OF THE REQUIRED VALUE FOR AN IFC 903.3.1.1 FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING. THEREFORE, THE REQUIRED FIRE-FLOW FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS 2,000 GPM AT 20-PSI FOR 2-HOURS+2. PROVIDE AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN BUILDING CODE SECTION 903.3. FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 901.2. INDICATE TYPE OF SPRINKLER SYSTEM PROVIDED AS COMPLYING WITH NFPA 13.3. PROVIDE AN APPROVED CLASS I STANDPIPE SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH BUILDING CODE & FIRE CODE SECTION 905. GREATER THAN FOUR STORIES STANDPIPES SHALL BE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS IN BUILDING CODE & FIRE CODE SECTION. STANDPIPE SYSTEM PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN CHECK UNIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 901.2.4. EACH STANDPIPE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED 2 1/2 INCH OUTLET NOT LESS THAN 2 FEET OR MORE THAN 4 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL OF EACH STORY. STANDPIPE OUTLETS IN STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES OR SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LOCATED SO THAT THE EXIT DOORS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE USE OF THE OUTLET AND LOCATED ON THE MAIN STAIR LANDING. ALL OUTLETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED VALVE, CAP AND CHAINS. FIRE CODE 905.4.35. PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALL OCCUPANCY GROUPS AND AT SUCH LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FIRE CODE 906. THE FINAL NUMBER AND LOCATION OF ALL EXTINGUISHERS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AREA FIRE INSPECTOR. 6. ELEVATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH PHASE I EMERGENCY RECALL OPERATION AND PHASE II EMERGENCY IN-CAR OPERATION.7. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED TO OPERATE WITH A STANDARDIZED FIRE SERVICE ELEVATOR KEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE CODE 604.8. BUILDING CODE 3003.3 8. IN THE EVENT OF POWER SUPPLY FAILURE IN ROOMS, SPACES AND BUILDINGS THAT REQUIRE TWO OR MORE MEANS OF EGRESS, AN EMERGENCY ELECTRICAL SYSTEM FOR A DURATION OF NOT LESS THAN 90 MINUTES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN BUILDING CODE 1008.3. 9. THE MEANS OF EGRESS TRAVEL SHALL BE ILLUMINATED AT ANY TIME THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED WITH A LIGHT INTENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN 1 FOOT-CANDLE AT THE FLOOR LEVEL. BUILDING CODE 1008.2.1.10. THE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO EXITS SHALL BE MARKED BY READILY VISIBLE EXIT SIGNS TO CLEARLY INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL AS REQUIRED BY BUILDING CODE 1013.1; AND SHALL BE INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1013.3 AND 1013.5. NOTE: ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGNS MAY BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF FIELD INSPECTION .SITE PLAN LEGEND: ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVELPROPERTY LINE SCOPE OF WORK BUILDING FOOTPRINT HIGH IMPACT BOLLARD, REFERENCE STRUCTURAL FOR DETAIL LOCATION OF THE REPLACED PLANTER WALLSLOCATION OF THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS DN 8.33%DN EXISTING TRUCK EXIT STORAGE ROOM (NIC) STORAGE ROOM (NIC) EXISTING TRUCK ENTRANCE OPEN TO LOADING DOCK BELOW PROPERT Y L I N E FRONT YARD EXISTING SIDEWALK ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE GRADE PLANE CALCULATION:(BASE LINE ELEVATION 4200')A: (73.5'+74.5')/2 X100.16' = 7,411.83'B: (74.5'+75.5')/2 X221.00' = 16,586.05'C: (75.6'+57.0')/2 X32.16' = 2132.20'D: (57.0'+55.0')/2 X21.66' = 1,212.96'E: (55.0'+58.6')/2 X69.66' = 3,956.68'F: (58.6'+55.2')/2 X134.16' = 7,633.70'G: (55.2'+55.7')/2 X134.50' = 7,458.02'H: (55.7'+52.0')/2 X46.50' = 2,504.02'I: (52.0'+56.1')/2 X52.33' = 2,828.43'J: (56.1'+73.5')/2 X83.00' = 5,378.40'TOTAL PERIMETER = 895.13'/57,102.2957102.29'/895.13'= 63.79'GRADE PLANE = 4263.79' A: (73.5'+74.5')/2 X100.16' = 7,411.83' 221.00' 100.16' B: (74.5'+75.5')/2 X221.00' = 16,586.05' C: (75.6'+57.0')/2 X32.16'= 2132.20' E: (55.0'+58.6')/2 X69.66' = 3,956.68'D: (57.0'+55.0')/2 X21.66' = 1,212.96' F: (58.6'+55.2')/2 X134.16' = 7,633.70' G: (55.2'+55 . 7 ' ) / 2 X 1 3 4 . 5 0 ' = 7 , 4 5 8 . 0 2 ' H: (55.7'+52.0')/2 X46.50' = 2,504.02'I:(52.0'+56.1')/2 X52.33'= 2,828.43'J: (56.1'+7 3 . 5 ' ) / 2 X 8 3 . 0 0 ' = 5 , 3 7 8 . 4 0 ' 32.16'21.66' 69.66'134.16' 134.50' 46.50'52.33' 83.00' SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 8/28/2025 2 : 2 4 : 2 1 P M SITE PLAN A1.00 12 / 06 / 2024 61 S 400 W . SALT LAK E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 TD/DA SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SALT L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP 1/32" = 1'-0"SITE PLAN1 NREFERENCETRUENORTH EXPANSION JOINT 1" = 40'-0"3GRADE PLANE CALCULATION DIAGRAM PER UBC CHAPTER 202 PLAN NOTES NO. DATE REVISION04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set1 04/30/2025 Bulletin #13 05/30/2025 Bulletin #35 08/01/2025 Bulletin #57 xx/xx/2025 Bulletin #7 5 5 7 7 7 6" ee e ee RAMP DN EXISTING VEHICULAR RAMP TO REMAIN 1.NOVERTICAL OBSTRUCTION (COLUMN, WALL, PIPE, BOLLARD, EQUIPMENT OR SIMILAR) WHICH EXTENDS VERTICALLY ABOVE THE FLOOR LEVEL SHALL BE LOCATED:A. WITHIN ANY PARKING SPACE'S CLEAR DIMENSIONS, IF LOCATED ALONG THE SIDE CENTERLINE LENGTH OF A PARKING SPACE, THE OBSTRUCTION MUST BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF 1'-0" OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTH AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. SEE STRIPING DETAILS.B. WITHIN ANY ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE SPACE'S ACCESS AISLE, ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL OR ACCESIBLE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE'S CLEAR DIMENSION, AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS.C. WITHIN ANY PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH AND 30" MIN. CLEAR ACCESS PATH FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHERS OR STANDPIPES, OR ACCESSIBLE PATHS OF TRAVEL. SEE EGRESS PLANS FOR ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL DIAGRAMS.D. NO OSBTRUCTIONS WITHIN DRIVE AILES.2. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPED EXCEPT FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACES WHICH SHALL BE SINGLE STRIPED. SEE STRIPING DETAILS.3. SEE A5.01 AND A5.02 FOR STRIPING DETAILS.4. IDENTIFICATION LABELING IS ILLUSTRATED AS SOLID BLACK TEXT AND ACTUAL PAINTED FLOOR GRAPHICS ARE ILLUSTRATED AS OUTLINED TEXT. REFER TO GRAPHIC LEGEND BELOW FOR EXAMPLE.5. SEE SHEET A7.01 FOR PIPE GUARD DETAILS. VERIFY LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED IN FIELD.6. SEE HEADROOM DIAGRAM FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED VERTICAL CLEARANCE ABOVE PARKING AREAS FOR ALL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS. GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATION OF BACK OF SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF CENTERLINE OF VEHICLE SPACE, SEE DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC STRIPING LAYOUT - DO NOT STRIPE STRIPING AND SYMBOL LEGEND:(REFER TO STRIPING AND OTHER DETAILS)GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF FRONT OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPE, SEE PLANS FOR ORIENTATION STEP SYMBOL AT CONCRETE CURBSEE PARKING BOLLARD OR HIGH IMPACT BOLLARD, SEE ORDETECTABLE WARNING / TRUCATED DOME, SEE DIAGONAL STRIPING, SEE A5.01 - A5.02CLEAR LENGTH O F P A R K I N G S P A C E CLEAR WIDTH OF PARKING SPACE DELINEATOR POSTSEE SIGNAGE BOLLARD, FLOOR MOUNT SEE FLOOR ELEVATION DATUM:4200.00'=00.00' 6/A5.015/A7.02 8/A5.01 ADA RESERVED IDENTIFICATION LABELING OF VEHICLE SPACE - DO NOT STRIPEPAINTED FLOOR GRAPHIC SEE STRIPING DETAILS 1/A9.13 10/A7.02 1A3.05 1A3.07 G.P G.D G.EG.F G.G G.M G.N G.O G.1 G.2 G.5 G.5.9G.7 G.9 1A3.06 A1.014 G.6 G.7.9G.8G.3 G.4 G.7.5 G.H G.I G.J G.KG.L G.C G.B G.Q 1A3.08 T A4 G.5.2 G.8.2 G.8.6 G.C.4 5A4.20 P R S U W X O1 P1 X1 U1 O24 O653 O654 O655 O656 O657 O660 4A4.20 56.92' 5.14 5.155.143.11 5.14 5.14 5.143.11 3.11 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.14 5.145.15 5.15 5.15 5.15 5.14 5.14 5.143.11 22'-6"22'-6"27'-9"21'-0"35'-4 1/2"4'-3" 7'-4 1/2" 11'-7 1/2" 8'-5 1/2" 3'-2"30'-0" 20'-1" 51'-8" 21'-0" 8'-0" 19'-9" 18'-0" 9'-0" 18'-0" 18'-0" 4'-6" 22'-6" 27'-9"STORAGE (NIC) 100 S N 400 W OPEN TO BELOW PROPERTY LINE ARENA GRID L I N E VERIFY IN F I E L D FOOTPRINT OF OPEN PARKING GARAGE ABOVE PROPERTY LINE FEC EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN (NIC) LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK LIMIT OF SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING BOLLARDS TO REMAIN EXISTING BOLLARDS TO REMAIN ARENA GRID LINEVERIFY IN FIELD MEZZANINE BASEMENT LEVEL PROPERTY LINE EXISTING SIDEWALK 10'-0"3'-9 1/2" 10'-0" 38° 1'-0" 1'-0" 20'-8" 5'-1" 1'-0" 224'-8 1/2"228'-7 1/4" 1'-6" 2 1/4"1'-0" 10'-0"1'-6"1'-0" 227'-0 3/4" 1'-0" 10'-3"1'-0"1'-0" 1'-0" 1'-0"10'-0"1'-6" 9'-4 1/2" 1'-0" 10'-3" 1'-0" 1'-6" 228'-0 3/4" 53° 41°42'-0 1/4" 39'-4 3/4" 127° 12'-0" 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-6" 12'-3" 12'-6" 10'-6" 49'-6" 59'-8 1/2" 19'-0" 10'-6" 21'-3 1/2" 10'-6" 18'-1" 1'-7" 10'-0" 1'-6" 1 9 ' - 8 " 10'-6" 21'-3 1/2"10'-6" 19'-0" 59'-8 1/2" 24'-5" 50'-6" 10'-0" 1'-2 1/2"6'-0"2'-4" 89'-10 1/2" 29'-8 1/2" 39'-3" 31'-9 1/2" 31'-10" 5'-8 1/2" PILE CAP FOOTING PLANTER BOX COLUMN BASEPLATE PILE CAP FOOTING PILE CAP FOOTING COLUMN BASEPLATE PROPERTY LINE PLANTER BOX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DESIGNED BYREVIEWED BYDRAWN BYPROJECT NUMBER DATE IRO / SEAL IN ASSOCIATION WITH : ISSUE Copyright © 2025 WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT TEAM PROJECT NAME ARCHITECT / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WALTER P. MOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.633 W 5TH ST, SUITE 7200,LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071PHONE: 310.254.1900 FAX: 310.254.1940 M09-21011-00 KEYNOTES 3D LEVEL PLAN PLAN NOTES WALTER P. MOOREARCHITECTELECTRICAL & LOW VOLTAGE ENGINEERSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERMECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE ENGINEERTRAFFIC ENGINEERING HORROCKSCIVIL & LANDSCAPEWALTER P. MOOREBNA CONSULTINGVBFAHALES ENGINEERING 301 SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101(801)-325-2000IN ASSOCIATION WITH :CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OWNER 8/28/2025 2 : 3 6 : 2 7 P M PLANTER PLAN A2.00B 08 / 26 / 2025 61 S 400 W . SALT LAK E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 YC SB 61 S 4 0 0 W . SALT L A K E C I T Y , U T A H 8 4 1 0 1 EP Keynote LegendKey Value Keynote Text3.11 CONCRETE CURB/ISLAND 6" HIGH, REFER TO DETAIL 8/A5.015.14 WIDE FLANGE STEEL COLUMN WITH STL COATING SYSTEM, TYP. - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS.5.15 STEEL BRACE - REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS. NREFERENCETRUENORTH NO. DATE REVISION10/31/2024 50% Design Development12/06/2024 100% Design Development02/14/2025 50% Construction Documents03/07/2025 Phase 1 Permit Set03/21/2025 Bid Set04/07/2025 Phase 2 Permit Set7 xx/xx/2025 Bulletin #7 71" = 12'-10"PLANTER PLAN - UPPER LEVEL B1 (MEZZANINE)1 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/30/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/06/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Hulka, Andy E-mail Andy.Hulka@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/04/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/06/2025 Subject: Partial Street Vacation - 1101 W 400 S New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: "As to form" signature block has been updated. Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Andy Hulka, andy.hulka@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Recommending approval of the vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West, and denial of the vacation of the right-of-way along 400 South. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process • Early Notification – On March 18, 2025, the Poplar Grove Community Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council provided a letter ofsupport, which is attached to the Planning Commission staff report for review. A notice of theproposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. An onlineopen house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from March to May. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a publichearing on May 28th, 2025. The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation ofapproval for the vacation on the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation ofdenial for the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. The full public meeting can beviewed using this link starting at 57:00. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Erik Sansom, applicant and property owner, is requesting approval to vacate a portion of public right-of-way adjacent to his property at the corner of 400 South and 1100 West. The area in question is approximately 5 feet between the property boundaries and the public sidewalk. This request would not impact the sidewalk. The applicant is requesting the partial street vacation to facilitate the future construction of a new single-family residence on the property. The application pointed to lack of use as the primary reason for this request. (Aerial view of subject property) The following concerns were identified specific to vacating the right-of-way along 400 South: • Vacation along 400 South would result in an inconsistent right-of-way width along the 400 South corridor. If approved, this request would result in a right-of-way that is 5 feet narrower than the rest of the corridor. • Vacating the right-of-way along 400 South could limit options for future improvements in the area. The 400 South Viaduct Trail, a multi-use trail from 900 West to 200 West, is scheduled to begin construction this summer. No formal plans are currently proposed to extend this trail to the west; however, the Transportation Division has noted the possibility of a trail extension sometime in the future. The street context on 1100 West differs from the context on 400 South. 1100 West is a dead-end street, leading to a gated parking lot for the Neighborhood House Riverside Adult Day Center. Because the street ends after the subject property, the request to vacate this portion of right-of-way would not result in inconsistent right-of-way widths. This right-of-way segment also includes stairs and a retaining wall, which are significant obstructions that materially block the right-of-way. Because the area has been developed and used as private yard space with obstructions that block the right-of-way, this portion of the request complies with the “lack of use” standard in the code. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on May 28th, 2025, and voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation to the City Council for approval of the vacation of the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West, and denial of the vacation of the right-of-way along 400 South. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification – On March 18, 2025, the Poplar Grove Community Council was sent the 45- day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council provided a letter of support, which is attached to the Planning Commission staff report for review. A notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. An online open house was posted on the Planning Division’s website from March to May. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on May 28th, 2025. The Planning Commission voted 7-2 to forward a recommendation of approval for the vacation on the right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation of denial for the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. The full public meeting can be viewed using this link starting at 57:00. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of May 28, 2025 b) PC Minutes of May 28, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of May 28, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List 5. Ordinance This page has intentionally been left blank EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. MAILING LIST 5. ORDINANCE 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00178 - Partial Street Vacation at 1101 W 400 S February 25, 2025 Petition for the Street Vacation was accepted by Salt Lake City Planning Division. March 10, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-00178 was assigned to Andy Hulka, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. March 18, 2025 Early notification was sent to the Poplar Grove Community Council Chair, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. March 18, 2025 An early notification letter was sent to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the portions of the right-of-way requested to be vacated. May 2, 2025 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. May 16, 2025 Public hearing notice signs with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at the subject property. May 28, 2025 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a recommendation to approve the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 1100 West and a recommendation to deny the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to 400 South. 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00178, a petition submitted by the property owners of 1101 W 400 S to vacate a portion of the street right-of-way adjacent to their property at the corner of 400 South and 1100 West. When a portion of a street is vacated, it is no longer public property. In this case, the petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the street right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area in question is approximately 5 feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. The subject property is located within Council District 2, represented by Alejandro Puy. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: PLACE: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Andy Hulka at 801-535-6608 or via e-mail at andy.hulka@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00178. The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 3. ORIGINAL PETITION ALLEY / STREET VACATION PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 5 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. REQUIRED FEES • Alley Vacation: $316 filing fee †. • Street Vacation: $473 filing fee. • Additional required notice fees will be assessed after submission. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. I M P O R T A N T I N F O R M A T I O N ALLEY / STREET VACATION DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. FOOTNOTES: † ALLEY VACATION FEE WAIVER AVAILABLE IF ADEQUATE SIGNATURES ARE OBTAINED. Owner Contractor* Other*Architect* REQUEST CASE NUMBER MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner’s consent required) A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N O F F I C E U S E LOCATION OF ALLEY / STREET PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) EMAIL PHONE PHONE EMAIL IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST 1100 W 400 S Move property line to sidewalks edge on the east and north side of property Erik G Sansom 509-240-4099 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 erikgsansom@gmail.com Erik Sansom 509-240-4099 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 erikgsansom@gmail.com 4th South House ALLEY / STREET VACATION PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 6 NAME OF OWNER EMAIL PHONEMAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS APPLICATION TYPE A C K N O W L E D G M E N T O F R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y L E G A L P R O P E R T Y O W N E R C O N S E N T NAME OF APPLICANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY EMAIL SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE 1. This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. If the applicant is not the legal owner of the property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. 1. If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2. If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3. If a Home Owner’s Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PART 5. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. erikgsansom@gmail.com 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 509-240-4099 Street/Alley Vacation 2/24/25 E 11 FT OF LOT 12 & ALL OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB. Erik Sansom erikgsansom@gmail.com 809 S Emery St., Salt Lake City, UT, 84104 2/24/25 Erik G Sansom Right Of Way Vacation To Whom It May Concern, I, Erik Sansom, am petitioning the city to relinquish its interest in the right of way on the East and North sides of my property located at 1101 W 400 S. The land I am attempting to acquire from the city is the five feet (5’) of land between my property line and the city sidewalk on the East and North sides of my property. The East side pertaining to 1100 W and the North side pertaining to 400 S. The purpose of petitioning for this property acquisition started when Jason and I (property owners) attempted to rebuild the current home that sits on the property. The home was built in 1906 and had been abandoned for almost 20 years before Jason and I took ownership. Leading it to be severely dilapidated making a new rebuild of the home the most logical choice. As we started to file the necessary paperwork with the city to rebuild the home we quickly realized that according to current city code we were unable to accomplish a rebuild of the home as it sits on the lot today. The code demanded that the new home be three feet (3’) smaller in width and adding a garage would make our lot coverage exceed the allowable amount by three hundred twenty four square feet (324’). In addition the code demanded we move the home four feet (4’) rearward from its current location to comply with the block face average. These demands of the code stem from our property being a legal non complying lot that does not meet the minimum standards required for an R-1/5000 lot. Mainly the width of the property only being thirty six feet (36’) effecting us the most. Because of these code issues we applied for a variance request and we were denied because of the aforementioned issues. Leading us now to apply for this right of way request in order to bring our current lot and home into greater compliance with the current residential building codes thus allowing us to rebuild the home that has stood for almost 120 years. If our request was granted from the city not only would it solve some of the issues we currently have with setback rules but also the conflict of maintaining the land that is owned by the city. Currently on the east side of the property a retaining wall that spans almost half of the lot depth sits at the sidewalk edge with no setbacks. It is in signifiant disrepair and needs to be addressed which was part of our plans to accomplish. This retaining wall which grants access to our property with stairs resides completely on city property and legally does not belong to us. This may become an issue with who or how repairs to this wall are made. Jason and I currently maintain all of this city owned property that equals to nine hundred twenty five square feet (925²’). If we were able to acquire this portion of property we would be able to repair the retaining wall and maintain landscaping as part of our property all while solving our issues of building a new home. With our variance request we have acquired signatures of abutting property owners and most owners within the block face showing support of our plans to renew this dilapidated property. We feel that if the city relinquishes this portion of land to us we will be able to accomplish what our neighbors and community desire which is a revitalized and aesthetically pleasing home. To address the bullet points the city provided in the policy considerations on the application form. We believe our request is unique because we don’t want the street or alley to be vacated in its entirety but rather our property lines be updated to coincide with the visual appearance of our lot and also to placate any issues that may arise from a maintenance perspective. This acquisition would not affect any abutting property owners as we are the only property that borders the requested land although we do have their support. It does not create a landlocked property or block access to private or public property and does not affect parking or access to the public street, alleyway or sidewalk. It also will not affect the ability for abutting properties to build new structures or maintain their ability to access their rear yard from the alleyway due to the fact that we want to maintain the rear property line abutting the public alley. To add to the issues presented by the city, the right of ways in question are not in current use by the city or any utility. They are simply “dead space” between our property line and the sidewalk. This change of property line would also not affect having or maintaining a park strip as the current park strip would remain between the sidewalk and gutter. A six foot (6’) strip on the east side of the property and a four foot (4’) strip on the north side. For all of these reasons we believe that vacating this right of way to the property at 1101 W 400 S would not only be justifiable but beneficial to the betterment of our community in poplar grove. In summary we are petitioning to acquire the five feet (5’) of land between our property and the city sidewalk on the east and north sides of our property. This solves our current setback issues and lot coverage issues by adding an additional nine hundred twenty five square feet (925²’) and adjusting the property lines to bring the existing home into setback compliance. Also allowing us to have a greater ability to maintain all aspects of the property. Thank you for your consideration and we hope to have a positive response to our petition. Erik Sansom 4. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 SOLOMON J CHACON; SILVIA P CHACON (JT)945 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SALT LAKE CITY 340 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 STRENGTH, PC 1123 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 DONALD C GOODIN; SHARON J GOODIN (JT 1117 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BRITTNY RENE 1115 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 HEBER HERNANDEZ PO BOX 461 MILLVILLE UT 84326 NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION 1050 W 500 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ERIK SANSOM; JASON SEATON 809 S EMERY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN C MENDOZA JR 1079 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JAVIER MARTINEZ; BLANCA E MARTINEZ (JT)1071 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN GONZALEZ; ANTONIA A MAGANA (JT)1065 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHI NGUYEN; PARI PHOTHIRATH (JT)1063 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MERCEDES GARDUNO 1057 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHRISTIE LYNN DUK 1055 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JUAN HERRERA; NATHANIEL TOPAHA (JT) 1053 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LUCAS DUFFEY; SHAWN KELLY DUFFEY (JT) 418 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BARBARA CHRISTIE NEILL 420 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GREGORY E CRAFTS 438 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 BARBARA RUFENACHT 444 S GOSHEN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 Current Occupant 1115 W 300 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 354 S BOTHWELL ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1107 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1121 W 400 S #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1124 W 500 S #NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1131 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1129 W 400 S Salt Lake City UT 84104 5. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2025 (Vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South) An ordinance vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 28, 2025, to consider a request made by Erik Sansom (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178) to vacate portions of 400 South and 1100 West in order to facilitate the future construction of a new single-family residence on the property located at 1101 West 400 South; and WHEREAS, at its May 28, 2025, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way within 1100 West, and a negative recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right- of-way within 400 South to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00178, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is hereby vacated and declared not necessary or available for public use. The request to vacate the portion of 400 South is denied. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 3 ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. ROW Vacation near 1101 West 400 South_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___7/28/2025_______________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords____________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the property to be vacated, which is a portion of 1100 West adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South: BEGINNING AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB.; RUNNING THENCE EAST 5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 144 FEET; THENCE WEST 5 FEET TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB.; THENCE NORTH 144 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 13, BLK 6, CITY PARK SUB. TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/07/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/14/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Elmore, Noah E-mail noah.elmore@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/14/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/14/2025 Subject: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Noah Elmore Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council follows the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the petition for a zoning text amendment. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: At the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The petition also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. This amendment primarily revises the existing buffer prohibiting certain uses from operating within 1,000 feet of single- or two-family zoning districts to include all residential zoning districts as listed in Chapter 21A.24. Specifically, the buffer is expanded to include the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45, RMF-75, and FB-UN1 zoning districts. Additionally, the provision is being amended to clarify that the buffer applies to the entirety of a lot as opposed to the boundaries of the use. As part of the proposal, staff is recommending that some uses be prohibited within the boundaries of Salt Lake City due to the risks they bring to health and safety of residents. Those uses are: explosive manufacturing and storage, flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage, medical waste/hazardous waste incinerator, and petroleum products refinery. Other uses which carry the potential to be highly intense, but not necessarily widespread in their impact (for example, producing air pollutants or excessive noise) on neighboring residents, are also proposed to be revised from permitted to conditional. The conditional use process would allow staff to better assess and mitigate potential impacts of these uses. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on January 23, 2025, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on March 10, 2025. Public Open House: An online open house was held from January 23, 2025 to March 10, 2025. No public comment was received. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 12, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of March 12, 2025 b) PC Minutes of March 12, 2025 c) PC Staff Report of March 12, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE Project Title: Text Amendment to Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01357 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 30, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments to Title 21A Zoning: • Amends Table 21A.33.030 • Amends Table 21A.33.040 • Amends Table 21A.33.050 • Amends Table 21A.33.060 • Amends Table 21A.33.070 • Amends section 21A.62.040 to amend the definitions of “Heavy Manufacturing” and “Chemical Manufacturing and Storage” Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. Amending Table 21A.33.030 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 Theater, live performance (Indoor) P1415 P1415 P1415 P1415 14. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved. 15. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24). Amending Table 21A.33.040 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/30/25____________________ By: /s/Courtney Lords_______________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney M-1 M-2 Animal: Stockyard C12 P12C12 Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing C12, 13, 19 P12C12 Explosive manufacturing and storage C12, 19 Flammable liquids or gases, heating fuel distribution and storage P12 Incinerator, medical waste/hazardous waste C12, 19 Heavy manufacturing P12C12, 19 Poultry farm or processing plant P12, 19C12, 19 Refinery, petroleum products C12, 19 Recycling: Processing center (outdoor) C12, 13, 14, 19 P12, 19C12, 19 Rock, sand and gravel storage and distribution C12 PC12 Slaughterhouse P12C12 Vehicle: Automobile salvage and recycling (outdoor) C12, 13, 14, 19 P12, 19C12, 19 12. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24) a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Amending Table 21A.33.050 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Theater, live performance (Indoor) P921 P921 P921 P921 9. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved. 21. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24). Amending Table 21A.33.060 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District G-MU Theater, live performance (Indoor) P4 4. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Reserved Amending Table 21A.33.070 by amending the Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS Use Permitted And Conditional Use By District RP BP FP AG AG-2 AG-5 AG-20 OS NOS A Manufacturing, concrete or asphalt Concrete and/or asphalt manufacturing Theater, live performance (Indoor) C15 C15 Permitted And Conditional Use By District PL PL-2 I UI MH EI P15, 24 C15 C15 C15 C15 15. Prohibited on lots located within 1,000 feet of Residential Districts (21A.24) a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District. Amending section 21A.62.040 by amending the definitions of “Heavy Manufacturing” and “Chemical Manufacturing and Storage” CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING AND/OR STORAGE: A facility engaged in making and storing chemical products from raw or partially finished materials. HEAVY MANUFACTURING: The assembly, fabrication, or processing of goods and materials using processes that ordinarily have greater than average impacts on the environment, or that ordinarily have significant impacts on the use and enjoyment of adjacent property in terms of noise, smoke, fumes, odors, glare, or health and safety hazards, or that otherwise do not constitute "light manufacturing". Heavy manufacturing generally includes processing and fabrication of large or bulky products, products made from extracted or raw materials, or products involving flammable or explosive materials and processes which require extensive floor areas or land areas for the fabrication and/or incidental storage of the products. The term "heavy manufacturing" shall include uses such as refineries and chemical manufacturing. The term "heavy manufacturing" shall not include any use which is otherwise listed specifically in the table of permitted and conditional uses for the category of zoning district or districts under this title. Effective Date: This ordinance, if passed, shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake City Recorder. [The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee.] Is there a penalty for violating this ordinance? If so, please state penalty or reference another ordinance that prescribes the penalty here. _________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________. If penalty for violation includes possibility of imprisonment, include the following statement: Per Section 78B-22-301 of the Utah Code, Salt Lake City shall provide for indigent defense services, as that term is defined in 78B-22-102 of the Utah Code. ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________. Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ CITY RECORDER 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2024-01357 November 13, 2024 Petition initiated by City Council. November 19, 2024 Petition was deemed complete. November 21, 2024 November 2024 – March 2025 Petition assigned to Noah Elmore, Associate Planner. Staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. January 23, 2025 Notice of petition sent to all city recognized community organizations. January 28, 2025 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. Public comment period ended March 12, 2025 February 10, 2025 Proposal was presented at the Sugar House Community Council meeting. February 20, 2025 Proposal was presented at the Liberty Wells Community Council meeting February 27, 2025 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 6, 2025 March 12, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage. Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. April 28, 2025 Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office July 30, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-01357. At the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The petition also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other related provisions in Title 21A may also be modified as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Noah Elmore at (801) 535-7971 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at noah.elmore@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-01357. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 1 November 1, 2024 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Nick.norris@slc.gov or 801-535-6173 Date: November 13, 2024 Re: Petition initiation requested by Planning Commission to modify the provision that prohibits some land uses from being within 1,000 feet of single and two family zoning districts. Petition Initiation REQUEST: The commission recently requested that a work session item be placed on an agenda to discuss broadening the applicability of a regulation that prohibits certain land uses within 1,000 feet of single- and two-family zoning districts. The request proposed expanding the 1,000-foot prohibition to any residential zoning district. The purpose of this request is to protect the health and safety of residents living in other zoning districts, not just those who live in a single- or two- family district. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the commission initiate a petition that would potentially expand the regulation that prohibits some land uses that are detrimental to the health and safety of residents from being located within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district to apply to other residential zoning districts where people live. The following motion may be considered by the commission: “I move that the commission initiate a text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot spacing requirement from residential zoning districts. The initiation may include reviewing other land uses that should have the provision applied, clarifying whether the distance applies to the property or the boundaries of a use, and other related provisions that may help protect the health and safety of city residents.” ATTACHMENTS: A. ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 2 November 1, 2024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Planning Commission recently asked the Planning Division to provide some background information on a potential text amendment related to the spacing requirements between some land uses and single- or two-family residential zoning districts. Specifically, the commission asked if that wording should be changed so the spacing requirement would apply more equitably to all residential zoning districts and not just the single- and two-family zoning districts. The commission also asked about clarifying how the measurement is applied so the spacing applied if any portion of the property is within 1,000 feet. The purpose of the footnote is to prohibit land uses that generate noise, odor, pollution and other impacts that negatively impact the health and/or safety of people who live near such uses. The allowed land uses in each zoning district are listed in tables found in 21A.33. The uses listed are shown as either permitted or conditional. If the table does not indicate that the use is permitted or conditional, then the use is considered prohibited. Some land uses in some zoning districts include footnotes that typically further restrict a specific land use under specific circumstances. One of the footnotes found in the land use tables reads “Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District.” A sample of the uses that this footnote applies are in the table below. Zoning Districts Permitted or Conditional M-2, P The table indicates that most of the land uses with this provision are in the M-1 Light Manufacturing Zoning District and the M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Zoning District. Some of the uses are also in the CG General Commercial Zoning District or the EI Extractive Industry Zoning District. If the commission initiates a petition, a more thorough review of the land use tables will identify all land uses that are subject, or should be subject, to the footnote provision. 3 November 1, 2024 All but two of the other land uses with the provision are in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. Attachment A includes maps that show portions of the M-1, M-2, and EI zoning districts that are within 1,000-feet of a residential zoning district. The maps show that the land impacted by the 1,000-foot buffer are all in the Capitol Hill, Northwest, and Westside Planning Communities. The maps show single- and two- family zoning districts in yellow and all other residential districts in orange. The A-Agriculture zones are included as well because they allow single family dwellings on large lots. The intent of separating out the zoning districts is to demonstrate how the provision currently applies (residential shown in yellow on the maps) and how it may apply if modified to apply to all residential districts. The “Theater, Live Performance” land use was recently reviewed by the Planning Commission because the City Council initiated a text change to expand where this use is allowed. That land use would not be considered as part of this initiation as a result. There are likely other land uses within the land use table that create pollution and other health or safety impacts where this provision may be appropriate. As part of the review, the land use tables will be analyzed in more detail to identify the uses that create health and safety impacts to determine if the uses should be subject to the proposal. The analysis will also review the land use tables that are part of the zoning consolidation project. It is possible that the footnote may be applied to other zoning districts, be modified as well, or additional footnotes added based on the analysis. APPROVAL PROCESS AND COMMISSION AUTHORITY The commission has the authority to initiate a zoning amendment. To do so, the action must be advertised on the agenda with at least 24 hours public notice, a commissioner must make a motion to initiate the amendment, and then a majority of the commissioners present must vote to initiate the petition. If an amendment is approved, the Planning Division will research the relevant changes, draft the proposed changes, check in with the commission to ensure the changes are consistent with what the commission intends, and then start the public engagement process. The desired output of the process is to update the code to protect health and safety by limiting how close some impactful land uses are to where people live and to do so as quickly as possible to limit the possibility of the identified uses being established. 4 November 1, 2024 ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 5 November 1, 2024 6 November 1, 2024 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/01/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Stuenzi, David E-mail David.Stuenzi@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/06/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/07/2025 Subject: Text Amendment - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Recommendation to adopt ordinance version 1-B. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning text amendment to clarify exemptions in Section 21A.02.050.B and update footnotes in the land use tables (Section 21A.33) related to utility exemptions. The proposed amendment’s purpose is to update the language in both sections to ensure consistency and clarity regarding utility exemptions. In addition to clarifying the exemptions within city code, the amendment ensures that exemptions apply only to specific utility equipment rather than all utility uses. It more clearly defines which utilities are exempt and includes government-owned and operated antennas, as well as fences or walls necessary to restrict access to public utility land uses or structures. These updates align with the city’s longstanding practice of exempting essential equipment while confirming that larger utility uses, such as water treatment plants and power generation facilities, remain subject to zoning requirements. Additional changes have been incorporated into the proposed text amendment to streamline the development process for critical infrastructure. Utility structures often have unique designs that don’t align with standard zoning and design requirements, creating unnecessary barriers to their development. This amendment exempts utility buildings and structures from certain design standards, allows administrative approval for new utility buildings in historic districts, and permits zoning modifications through administrative review within planned developments. Projects reviewed administratively would still require public notification to nearby properties, but a public hearing would not be required. At its March 12th meeting, the Planning Commission expressed support for the proposed amendment but recommended that it be reviewed by the Historic Landmark Commission, as it includes granting the Planning Department administrative authority to review new public utility structures within the historic overlay. The Historic Landmark Commission reviewed the proposal at its April 3rd meeting and agreed that it would be appropriate for Planning Staff to process these types of applications administratively. Both commissions have recommended approval to City Council. CONSIDERATIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL Both the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission held public hearings to review the proposed text amendment and unanimously forwarded a positive recommendation of approval to the City Council. Following these recommendations, staff identified the following for council consideration: • Planning Department Discretion – The draft ordinance exempted antennas from the zoning code if the antenna was for “public safety purposes.” This language has been changed to, critical infrastructure, and gives the planning director the authority to determine if an antenna qualifies as critical infrastructure. This change allows for some discretion and prevents the exemption from applying too broadly. • Eco-Industrial Buffer Area – Existing zoning does not allow antennas in the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area within the Northwest Quadrant Overlay. Language has been added to maintain the restriction. The above recommendations are reflected in the ordinance 1-B if the council decides they would like these changes incorporated. If the council does not want these changes incorporated, they are not included in ordinance 1-A. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on December 26th, 2024, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement was extended for a week due to the holidays and ended on February 16th, 2025. Public Open House: An online open house was held from December 31st, 2024, to February 16th, 2025. No public comment was received. Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 12th, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting: The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing on April 3rd, 2025. The Historic Landmark Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed text amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of March 12th, 2025 (Click to Access Report) Historic Planning Commission (HLC) Records a) HLC Agenda of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access) b) HLC Minutes of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Historic Landmark Commission Staff Report of April 3rd, 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance – Version 1-B 2) Ordinance – Version 1-A 3) Project Chronology 4) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 5) Original Petition 6) Public Comment Received after the Planning Commission Staff Report was Published This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE Version 1-B V2 Project Title: Zoning Text Amendments - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352 Version: 1-B Date Prepared: July 23, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025; additional recommended language by Planning Staff is highlighted in yellow. This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Section 21A.02.050.B.2 to clarify exemptions for certain above-ground public utility structures. • Amends Section 21A.33.020, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, to provide clearer and more consistent language regarding exemptions in footnotes. • Amends Section 21A.33.030, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.040, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.050, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.060, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.00, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1, Administrative Authority, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee for public utility buildings and structures when requiring a certificate of appropriateness. • Amends Section 21A.37.020, to exclude public utility buildings and structures from design review standards found in 21A.37. • Amends Table 21A.40.090: Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, by revising the second footnote to include a reference to the antenna exemptions in section 21A.02.050. • Amends Section 21A.55.020, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee when a public utility or structure is applying for a planned development and exempt these uses from minimum area requirements. • Amends Section 21A.62.040, Definitions, to redefine “Utility, Building or Structure” to encompass a broader range. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends 21A.02.050. B.2 as follows: 1 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: 7/23/25______________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney V2 2. Utility Installations: Equipment or structures for the provision of essential services to the 3 public as listed below: 4 a. Public utility infrastructure such as wWires, cables, poles, conduits, vaults, laterals, pipes, 5 mains, valves or other similar equipment for the distribution to consumers of telephone or 6 other telecommunications, electricity, gas or water, or the collection of, water, sewer 7 sewage, or stormwater, or transportation. Such infrastructure shall be when owned, 8 operated and/or maintained by a governmental entity or a public utility. Such installations 9 and shall comply with Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation 10 Administration rules and regulations and those of other authorities having jurisdiction. 11 b. This exemption includes gGround mounted utility boxes installed by a governmental 12 entity in the public right-of-way for public safety and management purposes, such as 13 traffic control devices, utility boxes for lighting and parking meters. All other ground 14 mounted utility boxes shall not be exempt from the regulations of this title and are subject 15 to section 21A.40.160, "Ground Mounted Utility Boxes", of this title. 16 c. Government owned and operated antennas, including communication towers, when 17 deemed by the planning director as critical infrastructure necessary to provide specific 18 utility needs to the public, except that: 19 i) If located within the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay, the antenna shall 20 comply with the provisions in section 21A.34.040. 21 ii) Antennas are prohibited within the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area of the Northwest 22 Quadrant Overlay District. 23 d. Fences or walls only when necessary to restrict access and promote safety of public 24 utility land uses or structures. 25 e. All other utility land uses, buildings or structures, shall comply with the applicable 26 standards of this title. 27 28 2. Amends Section 21A.33.020 to make changes to the following existing footnote: 29 5. See subsection 21A.02.050.B for utility regulations. Certain utility installations may be exempt 30 from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 31 32 3. Amends Section 21A.33.030 to modify only the following rows in the table: 33 34 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE 35 DISTRICTS: 36 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses by District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 exceeding the maximum height in the 18. Certain utility installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 37 21A.02.050.B. 38 39 4. Amends Section 21A.33.040 to modify the following table: 40 41 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING 42 DISTRICTS: 43 Use V2 Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building 1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. Certain utility installations 44 may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 45 46 5. Amends Section 21A.33.050 to modify the following table: 47 48 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 49 DISTRICTS 50 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 C1 C1 C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 51 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 52 53 6. Amends Section 21A.33.060 to modify the following table: 54 55 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY 56 DISTRICTS 57 Use Conditional Use By Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 58 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 59 60 7. Amends Section 21A.33.070 to modify the following table. 61 62 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE 63 DISTRICTS 64 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1,21 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height Permitted And Conditional Use By District V2 PL PL-2 I UI MH EI P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1,11 C1 C1 C1 65 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 66 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 67 21. New antennase and telecommunication towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in 68 the OS Open Space District for public safety, public security or Salt Lake City Public Utilities 69 Department purposes only., if not already exempted under section 21A.02.050 of this title. 70 71 8. Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1 as follows: 72 73 1. Administrative Authority: The following may be decided by the planning director or designee: 74 a. Minor alteration of or addition to a landmark site or contributing building or structure; 75 b. Alteration of or addition to a noncontributing building or structure; 76 c. Partial demolition of either a landmark site or a contributing principal building or structure; 77 d. Demolition of an accessory building or structure; and 78 e. Demolition of a noncontributing building or structure.; and 79 f. New construction of a public utility building or structure necessary for the provision of 80 essential services to the public. 81 82 9. Amends Subsection 21A.37.020.D and adds E as follows: 83 84 D. Utility: Public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to 85 the public shall be exempt from this chapter. 86 87 E. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, 88 structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a 89 landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in 90 Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. 91 92 10. Amends Section 21A.40.090 to modify the following table: 93 94 TABLE 21A.40.090: WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 95 Wall Mount3 Roof Mount3 Monopole With Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Less Than 2’ Wide3 Monopole With Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Greater Than 2’ Wide3 Lattice Tower Stealth District Height Limit But Not To Exceeding The Maximum Height Limit But Not To Exceeding The Maximum V2 60’ (Whichev er Is Less) The Zone Up To 30 Additional (Whichev er Is Less) Up To 30 Additional feet 2. New telecommunications towers are allowed outside the telecommunication corridor in the OS zone 96 for public safety, public security, or Salt Lake Public Utilities Department purposes only., if not already 97 exempted under section 21A.02.050 of this title. 98 99 11. Amends Section 21A.55.020.A as follows: 100 101 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny, 102 or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific zoning standards outlined in this 103 section. Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying provisions in 104 Subsection 21A.52.060.B. The approval shall be in accordance with the standards and procedures 105 set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 106 located. 107 1. Specific zoning standards outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet 108 the qualifying provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 109 2. Dimensional standards to accommodate a public utility building or structure necessary 110 for the provision of essential services to the public. Additional building height shall be 111 limited to 5 feet. 112 113 12. Adds Subsection 21A.55.060.C as follows: 114 115 C. Exemption: Minimum area requirements do not apply when the planned development is for 116 public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to the public. 117 118 13. Amends the following definition in Section 21A.62.040: 119 120 UTILITY, BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: A building or structure owned, operated or maintained 121 by a governmental entity or a public utility and needed to provide distribution, transmittal and or 122 maintenance for the provision of public utility services for water, sewer and flood control 123 including wells, pumping stations, reservoirs, water treatment plant, water storage tanks, detention 124 basins, lift stations, regulators and other similar facilities unless exempted in section 21A.02.050 125 of this title. Utility, building or structure does not include offices or other uses otherwise defined in 126 the code. 127 128 [end] 129 This page has intentionally been left blank 2. ORDINANCE Version 1-A V2 Project Title: Zoning Text Amendments - Utility Installation Exemptions 21A.02.050.B.2 Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352 Version: 1-A Date Prepared: July 23, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended March 12, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Section 21A.02.050.B.2 to clarify exemptions for certain above-ground public utility structures. • Amends Section 21A.33.020, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, to provide clearer and more consistent language regarding exemptions in footnotes. • Amends Section 21A.33.030, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Mixed Use Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.040, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.050, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.060, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Gateway Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.33.00, Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts, to add the utility exemptions footnote to Antenna land uses. • Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1, Administrative Authority, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee for public utility buildings and structures when requiring a certificate of appropriateness. • Amends Section 21A.37.020, to exclude public utility buildings and structures from design review standards found in 21A.37. • Amends Section 21A.55.020, to grant administrative authority to the planning director or designee when a public utility or structure is applying for a planned development and exempt these uses from minimum area requirements. • Amends Section 21A.62.040, Definitions, to redefine “Utility, Building or Structure” to encompass a broader range. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends 21A.02.050. B.2 as follows: 1 2 2. Utility Installations: Equipment or structures for the provision of essential services to the 3 public as listed below: 4 a. Public utility infrastructure such as wWires, cables, poles, conduits, vaults, laterals, pipes, 5 mains, valves or other similar equipment for the distribution to consumers of telephone or 6 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __7/23/25___________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney V2 other telecommunications, electricity, gas or water, or the collection of, water, sewer 7 sewage, or stormwater, or transportation. Such infrastructure shall be when owned, 8 operated and/or maintained by a governmental entity or a public utility. Such installations 9 and shall comply with Federal Communications Commission and Federal Aviation 10 Administration rules and regulations and those of other authorities having jurisdiction. 11 b. This exemption includes gGround mounted utility boxes installed by a governmental 12 entity in the public right-of-way for public safety and management purposes, such as 13 traffic control devices, utility boxes for lighting and parking meters. All other ground 14 mounted utility boxes shall not be exempt from the regulations of this title and are subject 15 to section 21A.40.160, "Ground Mounted Utility Boxes", of this title. 16 c. Government owned and operated antennas, including communication towers, for public 17 safety purposes, except when located within the Airport Flight Path Protection Overlay, 18 in which case, shall comply with the provisions in section 21A.34.040. 19 d. Fences or walls only when necessary to restrict access and promote safety of public 20 utility land uses or structures. 21 e. All other utility land uses, buildings or structures, shall comply with the applicable 22 standards of this title. 23 24 2. Amends Section 21A.33.020 to make changes to the following existing footnote: 25 5. See subsection 21A.02.050.B for utility regulations. Certain utility installations may be exempt 26 from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 27 28 3. Amends Section 21A.33.030 to add the following table: 29 30 21A.33.030: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MIXED USE 31 DISTRICTS: 32 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses by District MU-2 MU-3 MU-5 MU-6 MU-8 MU-11 exceeding the maximum height in the 18. Certain utility installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 33 21A.02.050.B. 34 35 4. Amends Section 21A.33.040 to modify the following table: 36 37 21A.33.040: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR MANUFACTURING 38 DISTRICTS: 39 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building 1. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B of this title for utility regulations. Certain utility installations 40 may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 41 V2 42 5. Amends Section 21A.33.050 to add the following table: 43 44 21A.33.050: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR DOWNTOWN 45 DISTRICTS 46 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 P1 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 C1 C1 C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 47 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 48 49 6. Amends Section 21A.33.060 to add the following table: 50 51 21A.33.060: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR GATEWAY 52 DISTRICTS 53 Use Conditional Use By Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height in the zoning district C1 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 54 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 55 56 7. Amends Section 21A.33.070 to add the following footnotes: 57 58 21A.33.070: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR SPECIAL PURPOSE 59 DISTRICTS 60 Use Antenna, cCommunication tTower P1 P1 C1 P1 P1 P1 P1 P1,21 P1 Antenna, cCommunication tTower exceeding the maximum building height Permitted And Conditional Use By District PL PL-2 I UI MH EI 61 1. Subject to conformance to the provisions in subsection 21A.02.050B of this title. Certain utility 62 installations may be exempt from the regulations of this title. See Subsection 21A.02.050.B. 63 64 8. Amends Section 21A.34.020.F.1 as follows: 65 V2 66 1. Administrative Authority: The following may be decided by the planning director or designee: 67 a. Minor alteration of or addition to a landmark site or contributing building or structure; 68 b. Alteration of or addition to a noncontributing building or structure; 69 c. Partial demolition of either a landmark site or a contributing principal building or structure; 70 d. Demolition of an accessory building or structure; and 71 e. Demolition of a noncontributing building or structure.; and 72 f. New construction of a public utility building or structure necessary for the provision of 73 essential services to the public. 74 75 9. Amends Subsection 21A.37.020.D and adds E as follows: 76 77 D. Utility: Public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to 78 the public shall be exempt from this chapter. 79 80 E. Certificate of Appropriateness: All new construction, additions, exterior building work, 81 structure work, and site work on property in an H Historic Preservation Overlay District or a 82 landmark site remains subject to a certificate of appropriateness as required in 83 Subsection 21A.34.020.E of this title. 84 85 10. Amends Section 21A.55.020.A as follows: 86 87 A. Administrative Review: The planning director may approve, approve with modifications, deny, 88 or refer to the planning commission modifications to specific zoning standards outlined in this 89 section. Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet the qualifying provisions in 90 Subsection 21A.52.060.B. The approval shall be in accordance with the standards and procedures 91 set forth in this chapter and other regulations applicable to the district in which the property is 92 located. 93 1. Specific zoning standards outlined in Subsection 21A.52.060.B.4.b for projects that meet 94 the qualifying provisions in Subsection 21A.52.060.B. 95 2. Dimensional standards to accommodate a public utility building or structure necessary 96 for the provision of essential services to the public. Additional building height shall be 97 limited to 5 feet. 98 99 11. Adds Subsection 21A.55.060.C as follows: 100 101 C. Exemption: Minimum area requirements do not apply when the planned development is for 102 public utility buildings or structures necessary for the provision of essential services to the public. 103 104 12. Amends the following definition in Section 21A.62.040: 105 106 UTILITY, BUILDING OR STRUCTURE: A building or structure owned, operated or maintained 107 by a governmental entity or a public utility and needed to provide distribution, transmittal and or 108 maintenance for the provision of public utility services for water, sewer and flood control 109 including wells, pumping stations, reservoirs, water treatment plant, water storage tanks, detention 110 basins, lift stations, regulators and other similar facilities unless exempted in section 21A.02.050 111 V2 of this title. Utility, building or structure does not include offices or other uses otherwise defined in 112 the code. 113 114 115 [end] 116 This page has intentionally been left blank 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2024-01352 November 12, 2024 Petition initiated by City Council. November 18, 2024 Petition was deemed complete. November 18, 2024 November 2024 – March 2025 Petition assigned to David Stuenzi, Associate Planner. Staff drafted language to support goals of the petition. December 26, 2024 Notice of petition sent to all city recognized community organizations. December 31, 2025 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. Public comment period ended February 16th, 2024 February 27, 2025 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 6, 2025 March 12, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage. Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. March 20, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. March 27, 2025 Staff Report posted to Planning’s webpage April 3, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. April 18th, 2025 Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. July 22nd, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-01352. At the March 12th, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to clarify the application of utility exemptions in 21A.02.050 and to standardize the footnotes in related land use tables. Related provisions in Title 21A may also be modified as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call David Stuenzi at (801) 535-6135 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at david.stuenzi@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-01352. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 5. ORIGINAL PETITION To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Tammy Hunsaker, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director. From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: November 12, 2024 Re: Initiation of a zoning text amendment to clarify zoning ordinance section 21A.02.050 Applicability and 21A.33 Land Use Tables. The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a zoning text amendment to clarify zoning code section 21A.02.050 Applicability and the associated land use tables related to utility uses, buildings, and structures. Currently, 21A.02.050 exempts utility installations that include wires, cables, conduits, vaults, pipes, mains, valves or other similar items and equipment that are necessary to distribute water, electricity, communication, sewer, and stormwater when owned, operated, and/or maintained by a government entity or public utility. The land use tables found in 21A.33 include a footnote that references section 21A.02.050, but the footnote is listed for all utility buildings and uses as well. This has created some discrepancy in whether all utility structures are also exempt despite not being listed in 21A.02.050. The intent of this amendment is to clarify that the longstanding practice of the city to exempt the necessary equipment (as listed in 21A.01.050 and updated as needed), including fencing needed to secure some equipment, from zoning regulations but that utility uses (such as water treatment plants, electricity generating plants, etc.) are not exempt and must comply with the applicable zoning regulations. This will not impact cell antennae or structures. The public process will include a minimum 45-day public input period before the Planning Commission holds a public hearing. All registered recognized organizations will be notified of the proposal. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is to not initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at 801-535-6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. 11/12/2024 Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Created: By: Status: 2024-11-12 Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) Clarifying utility related uses and structures that are exempt from zoning regulations (002) Final Audit Report 2024-11-13 "Clarifying utility related uses and structures that are exempt fro m zoning regulations (002)" History Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) 2024-11-12 - 8:54:32 PM GMT Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) for signature 2024-11-12 - 8:54:58 PM GMT Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) 2024-11-13 - 1:29:03 AM GMT Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2024-11-13 - 1:32:23 AM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed. 2024-11-13 - 1:32:23 AM GMT This page has intentionally been left blank 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights.   This page has intentionally been left blank COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Allison Rowland, Senior Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: RESOLUTION: SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO SALT LAKE CITY’S HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Housing Stability Division proposes shifting just over $230,000 in U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) HOME-American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds from the "Tenant-Based Rental Assistance" category to the "Supportive Services" category. This would allow the community organizations which are currently administering Tenant-Based Rental Assistance programs to also provide case management for their clients, who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or members of other vulnerable populations. The funds would be distributed to the same organizations that were originally awarded the contracts for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance as part of the 2024 HUD process. This would be a budget-neutral, technical shift to comply with Federal regulations on the use of the over $3.5 million, which was awarded to Salt Lake City in 2021. Federal guidelines require that the Council hold a public hearing on this proposed re-allocation within a 30-day public comment period organized by Housing Stability for this item. The Council could then consider adopting an amendment to move these funds. The public hearing on this item is tentatively scheduled for October 7. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposal to shift certain HUD funds awarded to Salt Lake City and indicate whether the Council supports this amendment. A.Purpose of the Proposed Shift. The Housing Stability Division proposes amending its original HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to support case management services by the community organizations that were awarded the contracts for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance as part of the 2024 HUD process. The Division explains that as the program was implemented, staff and their community partners realized that providing case management along with rental assistance was more effective than rental assistance only. However, the original funding allocation plan submitted to HUD in 2023 did not include any funding for the Supportive Services category, and case management is not an eligible expense under the HOME-ARP Tenant-Based Rental Assistance category. Project Timeline: Briefing: September 9, 2025 Public Hearing: October 7, 2025 Potential Action: October 21, 2025 Adoption Vote: TBD / Spring 2025 Page | 2 The remedy proposed is a budget-neutral reallocation of $230,306 from the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance category to the Supportive Services category, where case management is an allowable use. The community organizations selected would not change, nor would the total amount of funding awarded to them. If this proposed funding shift is adopted by the Council, Housing Stability will submit the amendment to HUD for final review and approval. B.Background of the Funds. In 2021, Salt Lake City was awarded $3,533,195 in COVID-era emergency funding under the American Rescue Plan (ARP). This amount was in addition to the annual HOME allocations associated with the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan ($974,873), and other ARP grants received. The $3.5 million in funding was designated by HUD for use in non-congregate shelter, affordable housing development, tenant-based rental assistance, and supportive services. To receive these funds, the Division of Housing Stability had to complete HUD’s detailed community needs assessment and create an allocation plan that showed how funds would be divided among several different spending categories., This Allocation Plan was adopted in 2023, and the Council approved Tenant-Based Rental Assistance allocations in 2024 through HUD’s annual process. All HOME-ARP funds must be spent by September 30, 2030, and staff will continue to administer the program until then. HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Proposed Substantial Amendment Community and Neighborhoods DepartmentHousing Stability Division September 9, 2025 Background •In April 2021, Salt Lake City was awarded a one-time $3.5M HOME-ARP grant from HUD, dedicated to non-congregate shelter, affordable housing, rental assistance, and supportive services for residents experiencing or at risk of homelessness. To access the funds, HUD required the City to develop and adopt a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan outlining proposed uses, which was then submitted to HUD. All funds must be spent by Sept. 30, 2030. •In March 2023, following a comprehensive HUD-required consultation and public input process, the City adopted the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, allocating funds for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), Development of Affordable Rental Housing, and Administration and Planning. •In April 2024, Council allocated HOME-ARP rental assistance funds through the City’s annual HUD funding application process. HUD later clarified that case management is not eligible under HOME-ARP TBRA, leaving three funded agencies unable to fully cover this critical service. HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION Proposed Amendments HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION •Although case management is a critical component of effective rental assistance delivery, it is not an eligible expense under the HOME-ARP TBRA category. •These needs can be met by shifting funding from TBRA to Supportive Services. •This Substantial Amendment to the Allocation Plan is proposed to support case management for HOME-ARP TBRA programs. Funding Amount Percent of the Grant Statutory Limit Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $230,306.00 Acquisition and Development of Non- Congregate Shelters $ 0 Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) $ 1,501,608.00 $1,271,302.00 Development of Affordable Rental Housing $ 1,501,608.00 Non-Profit Operating $ 0 0 % 5% Non-Profit Capacity Building $ 0 0 % 5% Administration and Planning $ 529,979.00 15% 15% Total HOME ARP Allocation $ 3,533,195 Anticipated Adjustments HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION Original awards are for TBRA direct assistance only; the amendment would allow for case management costs to be supported as part of a comprehensive TBRA program Agency Award Supportive Services/Case Mgmt. TBRA Direct Assistance Asian Association of Utah $193,608.00 $68,819.00 $124,789.00 Odyssey House $233,000.00 $23,000.00 $210,000.00 Utah Community Action $466,000.00 $138,487.00 $327,513.00 Next Steps To formally authorize this change, the City must adopt a Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and submit it to HUD for approval. The process and anticipated timeline are as follows: •Current (Sept. 18–Oct. 19): Housing Stability is conducting the required 30-day public comment period, including public notices and outreach. •Next (Oct. 7): City Council will hold a public hearing during the comment period. •Following (Tentatively Oct. 21): After the hearing and close of the comment period, Council will consider public input and adopt a resolution approving the Substantial Amendment (with revisions if needed). •Final: Upon adoption, Housing Stability will submit the amended Allocation Plan to HUD for review and approval. HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION HOME-ARP Allocations & Progress Update TBRA Project Award Status Drawn to date Utah Community Action HOME-ARP TBRA $ 466,000.00 Awaiting Case Mgmt. The Road Home HOME-ARP TBRA $ 344,000.00 Fully spent out $ 344,000.00 Odyssey House, Utah HOME-ARP TBRA $ 223,000.00 Underway - Awaiting Case Mgmt. $ 65,943.77 Asian Association HOME-ARP TBRA $ 193,608.00 Awaiting Case Mgmt. First Step House HOME-ARP TBRA $ 178,000.00 Underway $ 13,455.24 Alliance House HOME-ARP TBRA - 1805 S. Main St.$ 97,000.00 Nearly spent out $ 85,478.88 Development Project Award Status Drawn to date Housing Connect New City Plaza Apartments $ 895,000.00 Nearly complete Alliance House 1805 S. Main Street Rebuild $ 500,000.00 Nearly complete Housing Authority Pharos Apartments $ 106,608.00 Not yet started Questions? SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/19/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/20/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Royall, Heather E-mail heather.royall@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/20/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/20/2025 Subject: Substantial Amendment to Salt Lake City’s HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Additional Staff Contact: Tony Milner, tony.milner@slc.gov Dennis Rutledge, dennis.rutledge@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Tony Milner, tony.milner@slc.gov Heather Royall, heather.royall@slc.gov Dennis Rutledge, dennis.rutledge@slc.gov Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Schedule a work session, set the date for the required public hearing, and ultimately approve the included Resolution adopting the Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process A 30-day minimum public comment period will begin following the acceptance of this transmittal by the City Council, specifically for the above-mentioned HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Substantial Amendment components. The public comment period will be posted in English and Spanish. At a minimum, the public comment period will be noticed through the following channels: a newspaper of general circulation, Housing Stability’s comprehensive contact mailing/email list, Housing Stability’s website, the State’s Public Notice website, social media platforms, and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. At least one public hearing, to be scheduled at the City Council’s discretion, will also be held during the 30-day minimum public comment period. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On April 28, 2021, Salt Lake City was notified of a one-time supplemental allocation of $3,533,195 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP) funds, authorized under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. These funds, provided through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), are designated for non-congregate shelter, affordable housing development, tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA), and supportive services to benefit individuals who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, fleeing domestic violence, or at high risk of housing instability. This allocation is separate from the City’s annual HOME entitlement funding. All HOME-ARP funds must be expended by September 30, 2030. In accordance with HUD guidelines, the Housing Stability Division conducted a comprehensive consultation and public participation process to develop a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. A Substantial Amendment to the 2021–2022 Annual Action Plan was adopted on March 21, 2023, to incorporate the Allocation Plan and formally allocate the HOME-ARP funds. The adopted plan funded activities under three categories: TBRA, Development of Affordable Rental Housing, and Administration and Planning. Proposed Amendment A Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan is now proposed to support case management services for TBRA programs. Although case management is a critical component of effective rental assistance delivery, it is not an eligible expense under the HOME-ARP TBRA category. Agencies awarded HOME-ARP TBRA funds are unable to absorb these costs in their entirety through other sources. To address this, Housing Stability proposes a budget-neutral reallocation of $230,306.00 from the TBRA category to the Supportive Services category, where case management is an allowable use. This adjustment does not alter the agencies awarded, the total amount awarded to those agencies, or other components of the Allocation Plan, but enables essential case management services to be provided in coordination with rental assistance. Available Funds The table below reflects the proposed changes to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan: Proposed Use of HOME-ARP Funding Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $230,306.00 1,501,608.00 Total HOME ARP Allocation Process and Timeline To formally authorize this change, the City must adopt a Substantial Amendment to the HOME- ARP Allocation Plan and submit it to HUD for approval. The anticipated process is as follows: Current: • Submission of this transmittal initiates City Council review. • Upon transmittal, Housing Stability will begin the required 30-day public comment period, which includes public notices and outreach. Next Steps: • City Council holds a public hearing within the public comment period. • Following the hearing, the City Council considers and adopts a resolution approving the Substantial Amendment (see Exhibit 2: Resolution). Revisions may be made based on feedback from the Council or the public. • Upon adoption, Housing Stability will submit the amendment to HUD for final review and approval. PUBLIC PROCESS: A 30-day minimum public comment period will begin following the acceptance of this transmittal by the City Council, specifically for the above-mentioned HOME- ARP Allocation Plan Substantial Amendment components. The public comment period will be posted in English and Spanish. At a minimum, the public comment period will be noticed through the following channels: a newspaper of general circulation, Housing Stability’s comprehensive contact mailing/email list, Housing Stability’s website, the State’s Public Notice website, social media platforms, and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. At least one public hearing, to be scheduled at the City Council’s discretion, will also be held during the 30-day minimum public comment period. EXHIBITS: 1) Adopted HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 2) Resolution This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO, VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Consultation ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................... 14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis ...................................................................................................... 16 HOME-ARP Activities .............................................................................................................................. 25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals ................................................................................................. 27 Preferences ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Referral Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project ............................................................... 32 3 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive, please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to “the ARP” mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 4 Consultation In accordance with Section V.A of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME-ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJ must consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans’ groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family’s homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including, but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans’ groups, individuals with disabilities, persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity’s feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 5 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs – especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA, Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: Agency/Org consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Services, Inc. Veterans’ Group, Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Individual or Family. Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human 6 Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can Workforce Services Services for Low Income Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons Center Domestic Violence Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness – Individual and Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. 7 for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health Inc. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities. Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking Salt Lake – Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: The greatest gap to housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited Office of Homeless Services Homeless Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 8 Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Action Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. 9 of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Veterans' Group, Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Treatment, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population - over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. 10 Center Organization, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Center Services, Human Trafficking Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need Center Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and Association - DBA The Haven Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal 11 Violence Coalition Services, Human Trafficking Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. Habitat for Humanity Buyer Assistance, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness seeking stable housing. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. 12 SLC Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Civil Rights Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gap in housing/shelter is tenant choice housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 13 Health and Human Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to find information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management Housing Authority Domestic and Other Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and 14 Authority DBA Housing Connect Domestic and Other Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Years of Age. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake County CoC - Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Government Entity, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homeless - Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter - 450+ overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow 15 its adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive, and • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ must follow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient (LEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 5/22/2022 • Public comment period: start date - 5/22/2022 end date - 6/8/2022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 6/1/2022 • Date(s) of public notice: 2/1/2023 • Public comment period: start date - 2/12/2023 end date - 3/21/2023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 2/21/2023 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another from February 12, 2023 to March 21, 2023. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The public hearing on February 21, 2023, had three residents make comments. A summary of their comments is included at an attachment to this plan. Three additional comments were provided by email during the second public comment period. Those comments are also included. The draft Allocation Plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability’s webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. 16 Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022 and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. Three comments were made during the public hearing on February 21, 2023. One comment was in support of the draft plan. Another comment stated that additional accountability was necessary for homeless services and the last made suggestions related to emergency shelter operations. All comments were accepted and have been included with this plan. Three comments were sent via email during the public comment period. One was in support of the draft plan. The other two stated that there was a need for supportive services in addition to TBRA and suggested that HOME ARP funds be allowed to be utilized throughout Salt Lake County due to the high rental costs in Salt Lake City. All comments were accepted and have been included with the plan. Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. 17 Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Family Adults Only Vets Family HH (at least 1 HH (w/o of DV Beds Units Beds Units* Beds Beds Units Beds Units 483 47 862 0 226 60 136 Avail. 80 Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Permanent 0 0 0 0 634 1,055 73 329 0 268 7 26 Current Gap 1,230 Not Avail. 1,069 Not Avail. Data Source: CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (PIT) (2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. 18 Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table # of Units # of Households # of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At-Risk of 4,745 at 50% AMI (At-Risk of 14,850 or more severe housing problems (At-Risk of 6,555 or more severe housing 2,380 Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30% AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30% AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless, residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39% while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 19 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121% between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition, people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City’s cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30% AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. 20 Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) calls, case-managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50% AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower-income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls, requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re-housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. 21 Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging Supportive services dispersed location of shelters and… Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing Emergency shelter (beds) Online/hotline housing assistance Non-congregate shelters Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. 22 Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations More staffing Domestic abuse/violence Supportive services for homelessness Housing support/assistance Disabilities Mental health/substance abuse services Medical 23 Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50% AMI are housing cost burdened, paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50% AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30% AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.2.ii.G of the HOME-ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of “other populations” that are “At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,” as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. 24 Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Other (please specify) Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Stalking, or Human Trafficking) Preferred use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units Supportive Services Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Creation of Affordable Rental Housing 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Identify priority needs for qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the graph below, the qualifying population with the highest unmet need is homeless individual or family at 54.04%. Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should be expanded to qualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. 25 Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing – 20% • Senior housing – 13% • Long-term housing – 13% • Supportive housing – 6% • Non-congregate housing – 6% • Sustainable housing – 6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJ’s shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014-2018 CHAS, U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree Agree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 26 HOME-ARP Activities Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight, but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits. 27 Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $ 0 Total HOME ARP Allocation Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME-ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved $176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of $1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed-income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME-ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of $1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. 28 This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME-ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market, high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. 29 Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ’s priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe, which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development, home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME-ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 30 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP (i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a PJ-adopted preference to be selected for HOME-ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify for a preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME-ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualify for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: “Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term “Prioritization” to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section II.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice.” If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method of prioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME-ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME-ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and 31 civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJ fails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME-ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME-ARP allocation plan. For HOME-ARP rental housing projects, Section VI.B.20.a.iii of the HOME-ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30% AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30% AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30% AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30% AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. 32 Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE) process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME-ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME-ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE (or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a project or activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP project or activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C.2.ii) or to use only a project/activity waiting list (as provided in Section IV.C.2.iii) if: 1. the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJ for the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations where a project’s geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic area(s) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g., prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second, followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc.) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME-ARP projects and activities. PJ’s may use multiple referral methods in its HOME-ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis, unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System (UHMIS), Paystubs/ Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification (SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. 33 If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry (CE) process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a project or activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another referral method for a project or activity, describe any method of prioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD’s Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJ may not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations, participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(1)(iv). A PJ must describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VI.B.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. 34 Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV.A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME-ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ’s HOME-ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable EXHIBIT: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7, 2023, through March 21, 2023, with a second Public Hearing on February 21, 2023. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State’s Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor’s Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. Council Public Hearing on HOME ARP Draft Allocation Plan February 21, 2023 The following is a summary of public comments made during the Salt Lake City Council’s Public Hearing to discuss the draft allocation plan. Commentor: Damon Talbot Comments made via Webex. Summary of Comments: My name is Damon Talbot, and I am here representing the Alliance House. I wanted to offer our support for the amounts proposed in the plan. We look forward to applying for some of the funding for a new housing facility for our agency. I believe that housing is incredibly important in Salt Lake City, but especially for those with additional circumstances besides just their homelessness. It is very valuable for this money to come to the city and to use it for both housing and rental assistance. We are completely in support of the motion. Commentor: Bernie Hart Comments made in person. Summary of Comments: I think we are going to make an effort to come as often as we can in support of the people who will be the focus of the funding for housing and services for the homeless in the city. There is an element in all of these plans that is totally lacking. It is an element that I think is essential in finding programs that help the homeless, people that are addicted and people dealing with mental health issues. In my opinion we are doing the same thing over and over and not reducing the number of homeless in Salt Lake City or the Country. The one thing that is absent from the whole agenda is accountability. When somebody gets funding, there should be some assurance that they are actually transitioning people out of homelessness. I really do not know how many times, I am going to have to come here and say that before somebody starts holding somebody accountable for the tax dollars we are spending to help people. I think I will start counting. Commentor: Christopher Dixon Comments made in person. Summary of Comments: My name is Christopher Dixon. I want to add a suggestion. It was about six months ago, about the abandoned school for a shelter proposal. I understand that could work, but I am suggesting that for the homeless shelter rules, let the homeless run it. Have them run it themselves. If they earn it with you guys let them show that they can do what they do. I know that Salt Lake loves the homeless, but what drives you crazy is the trash. What I suggest is let them run it and do their own rules instead of the shelter rules that stresses them out. Let them have a community of themselves. I would give them a chance to let them earn it. They would definitely earn it. I know they would. That way they can transition into housing. That’s all I want to say. From:Laurie Hopkins To:Hase, Dillon; Council Comments Subject:(EXTERNAL) Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan - Shelter the Homeless Comments Date:Friday, March 3, 2023 2:35:38 PM Dear SLC Leadership and Staff, As Executive Director of Shelter the Homeless, I am submitting input on the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation plan, which outlines the use of these one-time funds to assist those experiencing homelessness in our community. Shelter the Homeless (STH) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to serving individuals experiencing homelessness and working with partners to develop safe facilities and expand solutions to prevent and end homelessness in Utah. STH is a leading provider of emergency shelter facilities in Salt Lake County, with the Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs) opening in 2019. STH provides 1,000 beds, or 72% of the capacity in the system, serving more than 5,000 individuals annually. STH contracts with third-party nonprofit providers to manage services in the facilities. The HRCs are positioned to provide access to emergency shelter and the supportive services a client needs to get back on their feet and move toward stable, affordable housing. We support the allocation of $1,501,608 to Tenant-based Rental Assistance to reduce the number of people who fall into homelessness and keep people in their homes, and $1,501,608 to Development of Affordable Rental Housing by investing deeply into affordable housing and support services so that we can reduce emergency and crisis needs. The length of stay in shelter has been increasing in our community for a variety of factors, including the disruptions from the pandemic, the need in our community for increased deeply affordable housing units since our vacancy rate is less than 2%, and general economic conditions such as mounting inflation, a housing shortage and high home prices. In addition, STH supports $529,979 to Administration and Planning, so there are resources for appropriate determination of the gaps in our continuum of care and the most strategic use of funds. On behalf of STH board and staff, we support the Salt Lake City allocation plan as the most strategic and appropriate use of funds. Thank you. Laurie Hopkins Executive Director Shelter the Homeless 242 Paramount Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 801-359-0698 office 435-655-5368 mobile Utah Community Action 1307 South 900 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 (801) 359-2444 www.utahca.org March 14, 2023 Salt Lake City Council PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476 Dear Salt Lake City Council, Utah Community Action (UCA) would like to express their appreciation and support for the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. We are excited that there will be additional funding available for residents facing a housing emergen- cy. This is especially important at a time when inflation and housing costs outpacing the earnings of the families in our community. UCA has administered the HOME program for over 15 years and has received annual funding from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County. Additionally, UCA has administered over $40 million in Covid rental assistance to clients residing in Salt Lake County over the past three years. From our experience, we have seen that it is imperative to provide clients with holistic case management to ensure they are successful and become self-reliant. Our clients are facing a multi- tude of issues that requires in-depth case management, which connects clients to resources that can adequately ad- dress their needs. We request that that the Salt Lake City Council reconsider and allocate a portion of this this funding for supportive services, such as case management, so clients are able to achieve long-term success. Without such flexibility in fund- ing, providers would be limited to only offering rental payments to clients. Moreover, HOME-ARP funding allows for supportive services and has other flexibility that could enhance the case management process. UCA also requests that the Salt Lake City Council consider expanding the boundaries of the HOME-ARP TBRA funds into Salt Lake County. We are seeing clients residing in Salt Lake City struggle to keep up with rent increases and are being priced out of the Salt Lake City rental market; most of these clients are moving South or West into Salt Lake County. By expanding the geographic scope of this funding, the Salt Lake City Council can ensure that clients receiving assistance are housed in units that meet their needs. UCA sincerely appreciates the work of the Salt Lake City Council and the Mayor's Office to address the housing crisis within our community. We hope that these suggestions will assist in enhancing the effectiveness of the HOME-ARP program. Sincerely, Sahil Oberoi Chief Operating Officer Jennifer Godfrey Chief Executive Officer PRESIDENT Lee A. Carter PRESIDENT-ELECT Louie Cononelos SECRETARY C.A. Bud Bailey TREASURER Steve Eliason PAST PRESIDENT Julie H. Kilgore EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Larry Barusch Kamie F. Brown Troy R. Christensen Paul Craig Steve Crane Matthew Durham Karen Gilmore Scott C. Godderidge Laurie Hofmann Richard Humpherys Brenda Koga Sara Kurrus Charlie Lansche Jannah J. Hurn Mather Bonnie Salazar Mifsud Matthew J. Moran Michael A. Pazzi Margrit Schneider Kerry Steadman Merlin S. Taylor Steven R. Taylor Hilea C. Walker Bret Yeargin COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD Pamela J. Atkinson, Chair Spencer P. Eccles Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Spencer Kirk Evelyn Lee Robert H. Perry Amanda P. Simmons TEL Administration: 801.359.4142 TEL Development & PR: 801.355.1433 FAX: 801.359.4178 w w w. t h e ro a dh o me .or g 210 S. Rio Grande Street Salt Lake City, UT 84101 www.theroadhome.org PRESIDENT H. Blaine Walker PRESIDENT-ELECT Chris Acton VICE PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Jennifer A. Johnson TREASURER Greg M. Johnson PAST PRESIDENT Bob Allen EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dustin Allen Kirk Benson H. David Burton Peter Chamberlain Twinkle Chisholm Dain Craig Steve Eliason – Emeritus Chip Everest – Emeritus Dell Loy Hansen Joseph Horton - Emeritus David Hilton Jace P. Johnson Steve Kogianes Leslie Motley Joyce Pell Pauline Ploquin Doug Smith Tony Smith Ron Sperry Sarah Starkey Susan Taggart Diane Terry PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Christena Huntsman Durham TREASURER Keb Brady PAST PRESIDENT Greg M. Johnson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Michelle C. Flynn BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chris Acton Dustin Allen Peter Chamberlain Angie Cook Connie Crosby Steve Eliason – Emeritus Rick Foster Brian Garrett Evan Goldstein Rhonda Greenwood Jessica Guynn Sue Mark Lunde Shawn Newell - Emeritus Aspen Perry Pauline Ploquin Gloria Salazar Chris Sotiriou Charles Stormont Nikki Walker James Washington Emily Wegener 1415 S Main St Salt Lake City, UT 84115 theROAD HOMERefuge. Resources. Relief. March 10, 2023 Salt Lake City Council PO Box 145476 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476 Dear Salt Lake City Council, The Road Home would like to express their appreciation and support for the Salt Lake city HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. We understand the immense amount of work it takes to compile a comprehensive assessment of needs throughout the community and are grateful to Salt Lake City's Housing STability Division for their thorough review. The Road Home is excited to see that development of affordable rental housing has been prioritized and recommend for funding. We continue to see a substantial number of individuals enter homelessness due to the continuously increasing rental rates in our community. The development of affordable rental housing for low- and very low-income families is critical to our community's efforts in making homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring. As a current HOME recipient of Salt Lake City, The Road Home is aware of the substantial need in our community for additional tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA). As such, we are thrilled to see that TBRA is being prioritized by Salt Lake City. The Road Home respectfully requests that Salt Lake City Council consider allocating a portion of the available funds to supportive services to better support the deployment and success of the TBRA programs operated by providers in the community. The goal of rapid re-housing programs is to help participants obtain and maintain housing stability. To facilitate this, The Road Home's case management teams provide comprehensive supportive services, developing housing stability plans with households and connecting them to additional resources in the community that will support their future stability. Research shows that case management provided to persons experiencing homelessness can improve housing stability, reduce substance use, and remove employment barriers. Studies have shown that individuals receiving case management are likely to reduce emergency room visits, reduce psychiatric symptoms, and increase engagement in medical and non-medical services. Traditional HOME funds cannot be used for supportive services. The Road Home utilizes private donations and other flexible grants to support the case management component of our current HOME awards to ensure that participants have access to this critical service. PRESIDENT Lee A. Carter PRESIDENT-ELECT Louie Cononelos SECRETARY C.A. Bud Bailey TREASURER Steve Eliason PAST PRESIDENT Julie H. Kilgore EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Larry Barusch Kamie F. Brown Troy R. Christensen Paul Craig Steve Crane Matthew Durham Karen Gilmore Scott C. Godderidge Laurie Hofmann Richard Humpherys Brenda Koga Sara Kurrus Charlie Lansche Jannah J. Hurn Mather Bonnie Salazar Mifsud Matthew J. Moran Michael A. Pazzi Margrit Schneider Kerry Steadman Merlin S. Taylor Steven R. Taylor Hilea C. Walker Bret Yeargin COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD Pamela J. Atkinson, Chair Spencer P. Eccles Jon M. Huntsman, Jr. Spencer Kirk Evelyn Lee Robert H. Perry Amanda P. Simmons TEL Administration: 801.359.4142 TEL Development & PR: 801.355.1433 FAX: 801.359.4178 w w w. t h e ro a dh o me .or g 210 S. Rio Grande Street Salt Lake City, UT 84101 www.theroadhome.org PRESIDENT H. Blaine Walker PRESIDENT-ELECT Chris Acton VICE PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Jennifer A. Johnson TREASURER Greg M. Johnson PAST PRESIDENT Bob Allen EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Matthew M. Minkevitch BOARD OF TRUSTEES Dustin Allen Kirk Benson H. David Burton Peter Chamberlain Twinkle Chisholm Dain Craig Steve Eliason – Emeritus Chip Everest – Emeritus Dell Loy Hansen Joseph Horton - Emeritus David Hilton Jace P. Johnson Steve Kogianes Leslie Motley Joyce Pell Pauline Ploquin Doug Smith Tony Smith Ron Sperry Sarah Starkey Susan Taggart Diane Terry PRESIDENT Becky Pickle SECRETARY Christena Huntsman Durham TREASURER Keb Brady PAST PRESIDENT Greg M. Johnson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Michelle C. Flynn BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chris Acton Dustin Allen Peter Chamberlain Angie Cook Connie Crosby Steve Eliason – Emeritus Rick Foster Brian Garrett Evan Goldstein Rhonda Greenwood Jessica Guynn Sue Mark Lunde Shawn Newell - Emeritus Aspen Perry Pauline Ploquin Gloria Salazar Chris Sotiriou Charles Stormont Nikki Walker James Washington Emily Wegener 1415 S Main St Salt Lake City, UT 84115 theROAD HOMERefuge. Resources. Relief. As HOME-ARP allows more flexibility than traditional HOME and can directly support the case management services, we are requesting that Salt Lake City Council reconsider allocating funds to the Supportive Services line to support case management for TBRA programs. The Road Home is also requesting that Salt Lake City Council and the Housing Stability Division consider allowing service providers who administer HOME-ARP TBRA to be allowed to use the assistance outside of Salt Lake City proper boundaries. Current TBRA recipient households frequently struggle to find housing located within Salt Lake City's boundaries, as Salt Lake City's housing stock is substantially more expensive than neighboring communities. Allowing both HOME TBRA and HOME-ARP TBRA funds to be used outside of Salt Lake City proper would better support housing stability for households exiting homelessness, as they would be more likely to find lower cost housing and reduce their rent burden. This is eligible per the HOME Code of Federal Regulations at 24 CFR 92(d). The Road Home appreciates the dedication of Salt Lake City Council, Mayor Mendenhall, and staff in their efforts to end homelessness within our community. We look forward to working with you on these efforts. Sincerely, Michelle Flynn Executive Director This page has intentionally been left blank 1 RESOLUTION NO.________ OF 2025 A Resolution adopting a Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan to reallocate a portion of one-time HUD HOME-ARP funding WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (City) is eligible under Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 24, Part 91, et. al., to receive American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021 funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Home Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) in the amount of $3,533,195 under program year 2021-2022; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 14 of 2021 adopted on April 21, 2021, Salt Lake City Council approved an appropriations resolution adopting the funding for the One-Year Annual Action Plan for 2021-2022, which included HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding received from HUD; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 8 of 2023 adopted on March 21, 2003, Salt Lake City Council adopted an amendment to the One-Year Action Plan for 2021-2022 to include HUD HOME-ARP funding and approve a HOME-ARP Allocation Plan, to be incorporated into the 2021-2022 HUD Annual Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the City would like to reallocate a portion of funds in the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan from Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) to Supportive Services, to allow for the inclusion of case management services directly related to TBRA; and WHEREAS, in order to reallocate said funds, the City is required to substantially amend the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan; and WHEREAS, the public notices, hearings, and other pre-submission requirements as set forth in 24 CFR Part 91 have been completed by the City, including but not limited to the following: a public comment period open from __________, 2025 through __________, 2025, and a City Council public hearing held on ___________, 2025 to consider the proposed substantial amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council does now meet on this day of ___________, 2025 to adopt a substantial amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The Salt Lake City Council hereby adopts as a substantial amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan the Proposed Changes to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan as set forth in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, to be incorporated into the 2021-2022 HUD Annual Action Plan. 2 2. That the Mayor, as the official representative of Salt Lake City, or her designee, is hereby authorized to submit to HUD the substantial amendment described above, together with such additional information and certifications as may be required under 24 CFR Part 91. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ______________, 2025. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By _____________________________ CHAIR Approved as to form: ___/s/ Sara Montoya_______________ Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __August 13, 2025 ___________ Name: Sara Montoya ATTEST: _________________________________ City Recorder 3 EXHIBIT “A” Proposed Changes to the Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan 4 SALT LAKE CITY HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL CITY COUNCIL VICTORIA PETRO, VICE CHAIR ALEJANDRO PUY CHRIS WHARTON ANA VALDEMOROS DARIN MANO, CHAIR DAN DUGAN AMY FOWLER Prepared by S A L T L A K E C I T Y HOUSING STABILITY DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBHORHOODS 5 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Consultation ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Public Participation ................................................................................................................................... 14 Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis ...................................................................................................... 16 HOME-ARP Activities .............................................................................................................................. 25 HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals ................................................................................................. 27 Preferences ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Referral Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project ............................................................... 32 6 Salt Lake City HOME-ARP Allocation Plan Template with Guidance Instructions: All guidance in this template, including questions and tables, reflect requirements for the HOME-ARP allocation plan, as described in Notice CPD-21-10: Requirements of the Use of Funds in the HOME-American Rescue Plan Program, unless noted as optional. As the requirements highlighted in this template are not exhaustive, please refer to the Notice for a full description of the allocation plan requirements as well as instructions for submitting the plan, the SF-424, SF-424B, SF-424D, and the certifications. References to “the ARP” mean the HOME-ARP statute at section 3205 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2). 7 Consultation In accordance with Section V.A of the Notice (page 13), before developing its HOME-ARP allocation plan, at a minimum, a PJ must consult with: • CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, • homeless service providers, • domestic violence service providers, • veterans’ groups, • public housing agencies (PHAs), • public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and • public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction. Participating Jurisdiction: Salt Lake City Date: 3/16/2022 Describe the consultation process including methods used and dates of consultation: This HOME-ARP allocation plan was prepared in consultation with agencies and service providers whose clientele include the HOME-ARP qualifying populations (QPs). QPs include: • Individuals or households that are currently homeless or are at-risk of experiencing homelessness, or • People who are fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, human trafficking, or • Populations for whom supportive services would prevent the family’s homelessness or having a high risk of housing instability, or • Households with a veteran family member that meets one of the above criteria. A wide variety of agencies serve the needs of QPs, including, but not limited to, entities that focus on homeless services, veterans’ groups, individuals with disabilities, persons facing violence and abuse, and those offering mental health services. On the front lines daily, these entities have provided invaluable insights and data for inclusion in this allocation plan and provide the foundation of our allocation plan analysis. In order to receive as much input as possible from the QPs, a survey was provided to 79 entities (listed below) to identify unmet needs and gaps in facilities and services, as well as to solicit feedback from these agencies on identifying HOME-ARP eligible activities currently taking place in their jurisdiction. A cover letter explaining the purpose of the survey and the importance of each entity’s feedback, signed by representatives from Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, was also sent with the 8 survey. The survey was conducted from January 24, 2022, through February 25, 2022, with follow-up phone calls and e-mails sent to non-responsive entities after that time period. In some cases, follow-up interviews took place in order to gather more data and a deeper understanding of current needs – especially unmet needs. The survey response rate was approximately 42%. All CoCs, PHAs, Domestic Violence Service Providers, and Veteran Services responded to the survey. A brief summary of responding organizations and the comments received are shown in the table below. In addition to the survey responses, extensive research and data was gathered regarding homelessness, populations at risk of homelessness, veterans, and persons attempting to flee situations of violence (domestic, dating, sexual assault, human trafficking, etc.). Major data sources used include: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), local point-in- time counts (PIT), CoC data, South Valley Services (Sanctuary), YWCA, Utah Community Action and United States Census data. List the organizations consulted: Agency/Org consulted Consultation Feedback Advantage Services, Inc. Veterans’ Group, Organization Serving Persons with disabilities Individual or Family. Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing is lack of Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing are truly 9 Human Trafficking Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in housing/shelter are safety, openings, crisis undisclosed shelter for victims, trauma informed services. Shelters are understaffed and overwhelmed. We need HOME-ARP funding in areas where the population can Workforce Services Services for Low Income Families/Individuals, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition Development of Non- Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Need available affordable Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in services is permanent supportive services and case management for persons 10 Center Domestic Violence Survivors, Human Trafficking Survivors, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness – Individual and Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. for family sober living. Greatest gap in services is mental health Inc. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities. Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is not enough DV/SA trafficking Salt Lake – Individual or Family. Preferred use of funding is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity of Salt Lake City Domestic Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: The greatest gap to housing/shelter is affordable accessible housing with limited 11 Office of Homeless Services Homeless Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Action Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the extreme lack of deeply affordable housing stock. This deficit leads to reduced shelter outflow and means we are able to serve fewer people with emergency shelter and housing. 12 Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. of Utah Service Provider Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Veterans' Group, Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health Treatment, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Many of the homeless and chronically homeless concurrently struggle with co- occurring and chronic mental health conditions that will not ever resolve. Our systems must realign to support these individuals over long periods of time, in some cases indefinitely. 13 SLC Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are in the aging population - over age 55. We are seeing an alarming rate of seniors being displaced from their homes. They do not have the ability to increase their income based on their age. We need more affordable senior housing. Center Organization, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Center Services, Human Trafficking Services Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance. Organization Comments: Non-profit organizations need Center Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Focus on deeply targeted affordable housing and 14 Association - DBA The Haven Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. Healthcare Provider Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is access to appropriate services to obtain the very limited housing available. Lack of seasonal Violence Coalition Services, Human Trafficking Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is flexible funding to help remove barriers for survivors of violence to gain access to housing or maintain their current housing. Salt Lake Buyer Assistance Attempting to Flee (Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking). Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in needed services is for mental health, substance abuse, affordable healthcare access in general. 15 Habitat for Humanity Buyer Assistance, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness seeking stable housing. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is to create Affordable Rental Housing. SLC Domestic Violence Services, Human Trafficking Services, Civil Rights Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gap in housing/shelter is tenant choice housing vouchers that reflect current cost of local average rent and not based on prior year domestic rent values. Also, the aging population is rapidly facing homelessness due to fixed income/retirement no longer keeping pace with senior housing voucher values. Mission Pantry Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Supportive Services. 16 Health and Human Services Homelessness. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: The greatest gaps in needed housing/shelter are too many restrictive conditions and definitions. Hard to find information on certain programs and website information being incorrect with no response to inquiry's online about programs by staff. We do not have enough special housing programs with services for people with disabilities. Homeless Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing, non- congregate shelter. Greatest gap in services is in case management Housing Authority Domestic and Other Violence Services, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA). Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is the lack of affordable, safe, and 17 Authority DBA Housing Connect Domestic and Other Violence Services, Veterans' Group, Fair Housing Organization, Organization Serving Persons with Disabilities, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Unaccompanied Youth under 25 Years of Age. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap in housing/shelter is deeply affordable housing. Greatest gap in services is supportive services that focus on housing retention. Salt Lake County CoC - Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness Government Entity, Families/Individuals at Risk of Homelessness Homeless - Individual or Family. Preferred use of funds is for the Creation of Affordable Rental Housing. Organization Comments: Greatest gap is housing - 2,950 housing units now and 1,400 additional units annually. Shelter - 450+ overflow shelter beds. Greatest gap in services is in case management and Summarize feedback received and results of upfront consultation with these entities: The feedback received is backed up by the data researched and forms the basis for our allocation of HOME-ARP funds. Specifically, our allocation plan prioritizes the gaps described by survey respondents and identified in the data. The major unmet eligible needs described by respondents include creation of deeply affordable rental housing and supportive services for the qualifying populations of individuals or families experiencing homelessness, at risk of homelessness, and domestic violence victims. Public Participation In accordance with Section V.B of the Notice (page 13), PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation 18 plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must followits adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission. PJs are required to make the following information available to the public: • The amount of HOME-ARP the PJ will receive, and • The range of activities the PJ may undertake. Throughout the HOME-ARP allocation plan public participation process, the PJ must follow its applicable fair housing and civil rights requirements and procedures for effective communication, accessibility, and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities and providing meaningful access to participation by limited English proficient (LEP) residents that are in its current citizen participation plan as required by 24 CFR 91.105 and 91.115. Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan: • Date(s) of public notice: 5/22/2022 • Public comment period: start date - 5/22/2022 end date - 6/8/2022 • Date(s) of public hearing: 6/1/2022 • Date(s) of public notice: 2/1/2023 • Public comment period: start date - 2/12/2023 end date - 3/21/2023 • Date(s) of public hearing: 2/21/2023 • Date(s) of public notice: XXX, 2025 • Public comment period: start date – XXX, 2025 end date – XXX, 2025 • Date(s) of public hearing: XXX, 2025 Describe the public participation process: Salt Lake City will conduct two public comment periods and public hearings, one during the creation of the plan from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022, and another from February 12, 2023 to March 21, 2023. The public hearing on June 1, 2022, had no attendees. There were no public comments during the first comment period. The public hearing on February 21, 2023, had three residents make comments. A summary of their comments is included at an attachment to this plan. Three additional comments were provided by email during the second public comment 19 period. Those comments are also included. The draft Allocation Plan was available on the Salt Lake City Housing Stability website for any person to view and comment on. The public notice can be found here and is an attachment to this plan. A Substantial Amendment to Salt Lake City’s 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan to recognize, accept, and allocate HOME-ARP funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was adopted on March 21, 2023, which allocated funds to three (3) specific HOME-ARP activities; Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA), Development of Affordable Rental Housing, and Administration and Planning. Due to the technical differences in the uses of HOME and HOME-ARP funding and updated HUD guidance on TBRA funding under HOME-ARP, case management is not considered an eligible activity, even when directly related to TBRA. However, case management is an essential component of TBRA in many local programs, and some agencies awarded HOME-ARP funds cannot absorb these costs elsewhere. Housing Stability seeks to reallocate a portion of the HOME-ARP funds from the TBRA activity to the Supportive Services activity, which covers case management. This reallocation will not affect the agencies awarded or their total funding awards but will allow a portion of the funds to be used for case management alongside TBRA programs. Per the regulatory requirements outlined by HUD in 24 CFR 91.505 (b), HOME- ARP Eligible Activities in 24 CFR, and the City’s approved Citizen Participation Plan, Salt Lake City must request a Substantial Amendment to: • The 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan HOME-ARP Allocation Plan This amendment is required to authorize the reallocation of HOME-ARP funds from the TBRA activity to the Supportive Services activity. To formally change the category of uses for these funds, a Substantial Amendment to the City’s 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan HOME-ARP Allocation Plan needs to be adopted by the City Council and approved by HUD. In order to facilitate this substantial amendment, a public notice was posted to open a new public comment period and a new public hearing was held. Describe efforts to broaden public participation: The notice of the public comment period and public hearing is posted in the local newspaper, online at Salt Lake City Housing Stability’s webpage, and through City Council postings. The posting was available in English and Spanish as well as ADA compliant. Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process either in writing, or orally at a public hearing: 20 There were no public comments received during the public comment period from May 22, 2022, to June 8, 2022 and no attendees of the public hearing on June 1, 2022. Three comments were made during the public hearing on February 21, 2023. One comment was in support of the draft plan. Another comment stated that additional accountability was necessary for homeless services and the last made suggestions related to emergency shelter operations. All comments were accepted and have been included with this plan. Three comments were sent via email during the public comment period. One was in support of the draft plan. The other two stated that there was a need for supportive services in addition to TBRA and suggested that HOME ARP funds be allowed to be utilized throughout Salt Lake County due to the high rental costs in Salt Lake City. All comments were accepted and have been included with the plan. Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why: There were no comments nor recommendations not accepted by Salt Lake City. Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis In accordance with Section V.C.1 of the Notice (page 14), a PJ must evaluate the size and demographic composition of all four of the qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of each of those populations. If the PJ does not evaluate the needs of one of the qualifying populations, then the PJ has not completed their Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table Family Adults Only Vets Family HH (at least 1 HH (w/o of DV Beds Units Beds Units* Beds Beds Units Beds Units 483 47 862 0 226 60 136 Avail. 80 Supportive 1,155 333 1,394 Not Avail. 622 Permanent 0 0 0 0 21 634 1,055 73 329 0 268 7 26 Current Gap 1,230 Not Avail. 1,069 Not Avail. Data Source: CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (PIT) (2020) Although there is an aggregate surplus of family and adult shelter beds, according to the above table, there is a difference with each population. For example, there are 1,323 adults experiencing homelessness in Salt Lake City and 862 beds available for immediate need. Transitional and permanent housing may take time to achieve, and a person will have to utilize a shelter bed while waiting on an application to transition or permanent housing. The gap for shelter beds available to families are 151. The gap for adult only shelter beds are 461. It is likely that all permanent supportive housing currently in Salt Lake City is rented at capacity. Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table # of Units # of Households # of Households Total Rental Units 42,179 Rental units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At-Risk of 4,745 at 50% AMI (At-Risk of 14,850 or more severe housing problems (At-Risk of 6,555 or more severe housing 2,380 Current Gaps 8,935 Data Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2014-2018) The above table shows a surplus of housing units available and affordable to households at 50% AMI. When looking at households at or below 30% AMI there is a significant gap of 1,810 units. This shows the need for deeply affordable rental units for residents at or below 30% AMI. It is likely that the number of households will continue to grow as Salt Lake City population grows over the next five to ten years. 22 Providing more deeply affordable housing will keep up with the continued population growth that Salt Lake City is seeing. Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries: Within the boundaries of Salt Lake City, we have the following data regarding the HOME-ARP qualifying populations: 1,958 people met the HUD definition of Homeless, residing in local shelters, transitional housing, or unsheltered during the HUD 2020 Point in Time Count. As shown in the table above, there are 7 unsheltered homeless veterans and 73 sheltered homeless veterans. There are 26 unsheltered victims of domestic violence and 329 sheltered victims of domestic violence. Other data received, including 2021 Fall Point in Time Counts indicate an increase in homelessness during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data shows that during Covid-19 unsheltered counts increased significantly. In 2021, the unsheltered PIT count represented approximately 17% of the homeless population. Further, approximately 18% of the homeless population avoided access to shelters due to Covid-19. In addition, the number of unsheltered individuals from 2019-2020 increased by 39% while the overall homeless population only increased by 6.3%. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT Of concern is the fact that unsheltered unaccompanied youth increased by 121% between 2019 and 2020, although show some decrease in 2021. 2018 2019 2020 2021 Fall Source: Salt Lake City/Salt Lake County PIT According to the 2020 Point in Time Count, the largest demographic of those experiencing homelessness are those people who identify as White at 71%; the second largest demographic are people who identify as Black at 13%. In addition, people identifying as American Indian or Alaska Native represent 5%; Pacific Islanders 23 represent 3%; Asians represent 1%; and multiple races represent 7%. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 The total number of emergency shelter beds in Salt Lake City are 1,349 (HIC, 2020). As shown in the table above, the number of homeless individuals is 1,958 (PIT, 2020). This indicates a shortage in emergency shelter beds versus homeless individuals. In addition, 4,166 people became homeless for the first time in 2020. At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, approximately 76% of the City’s cost-burdened households are renters and 60% are severely cost-burdened. According to CHAS data, Salt Lake City has 12,550 households that have an annual income under 30% AMI. This increases the risk of homelessness for those that are trying to maintain their current housing as house prices and rental rates continue to surge at an alarming pace. Median rent in Salt Lake City has increased by nearly 75% from 2000-2019 (2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates). Close to 84% of survey respondents indicated development of rental housing is extremely important to qualifying populations. In addition, 97% stated permanent housing should be expanded to meet the needs of qualifying populations. Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice There are two primary domestic violence service providers, South Valley Services (SVS) and YWCA Utah. These organizations serve individuals fleeing, attempting to flee, domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, as defined by the HUD Notice CPD-21-10. Together, within a one-year period, the two agencies have provided housing, safety and other services to 1,597 individuals that include men, women, and children in the State of Utah. SVS has received 2,217 hotline calls, 923 Lethality Assessment Program (LAP) calls, case- managed 1,007 individuals, and provided therapy to 426 individuals. YCWA served 2,112 individuals by domestic violence programs in the last year. The YWCA had 309 requests for services that could not be met and 48% of those were for housing. There are more data gaps in our Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking data due to more strict confidentiality rules surrounding this qualifying population. Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability, as defined by HUD in the Notice Other populations include individuals or households experiencing evictions, those earning under 50 percent of AMI, and those living in neighborhoods with low mobility rates. CHAS data indicates there are 22,610 households in Salt Lake City that are below 50% AMI. In the consultation survey, respondents identified lower- income renters and the elderly as especially vulnerable to housing instability due to 24 rising rents and home prices. In conjunction with job losses and unemployment due to the pandemic, as well as a reliance by the elderly on fixed incomes, there is an increasing gap between incomes and housing costs. Service providers indicated an increased need in services, including hotline calls, requests for shelter, eviction prevention, mental health services, medical care, case management and housing supports. Nearly 89% of survey respondents stated homelessness prevention services should be expanded in the regional area to support qualifying populations. Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing (Optional): According to the 2020 HIC report, the current resources to meet the needs of qualifying populations are as follows: 4,915 total year-round beds which include, 1,712 of emergency, safe haven and transitional housing beds, and 3,203 of permanent housing beds which include permanent supportive housing, rapid re- housing, and other permanent housing. The HIC report specifically identifies 2,199 family beds, 2,711 adult only beds and 5 child only beds. Subsets of the total year-round inventory include 757 beds for veterans, 110 beds for youth and 1,501 beds to serve the chronically homeless. In addition, there are 58 seasonal beds, and 160 overflow/vouchers. Data is not available to distinguish between congregate and non- congregate shelter units. Salt Lake City used motel vouchers to create non-congregate shelter units, currently there are no non-congregant shelters in Salt Lake City. Salt Lake City has made efforts to offer a wide range of services including TBRA, medical/dental services, mental health counseling, domestic violence shelters and counseling, legal aid and resources to identify available affordable housing. In November 2020 the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute provided a report outlining the current challenges in serving qualifying populations given the existing governance structure and made several recommendations for improvements, including the appointment of a statewide homeless services officer, a homeless council, and a philanthropic consortium. In addition, as reflected in the consultation process, the need for affordable housing is a high priority to service providers and government entities. Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations: As discussed in the sections above, the number of unsheltered homeless individuals has increased by 39% from 2019-2020. According to survey respondents, nearly 54% indicated a gap in affordable housing inventory in the regional area. This is also shown in the 2014-2018 CHAS data. As stated, multiple times throughout the consultation process, the need for services has increased and access to these services 25 has become cumbersome for qualifying populations. In addition to limiting barriers to access these services, service providers are in need of qualified staff to assist with providing services and support. As shown in the graph below, survey respondents stated there is a gap in case management services for qualifying populations. While the need for more affordable housing and more case management services was listed as a need for all groups, as shown in the survey responses below, specific needs for the various qualifying populations are listed following the two graphs. Homeless as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Over 60 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group Where are the Greatest Gaps in Needed Services for Qualifying Populations? Aging populations More staffing Domestic abuse/violence Supportive services for homelessness Housing support/assistance Housing/Shelter for Qualifying Populations? Specific populations including aging Supportive services dispersed location of shelters and… Rental assistance Permanent supportive housing 26 include: • Availability of deeply affordable housing for individuals or families • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Homeless Service Support • Additional Shelter Beds At Risk of Homelessness as defined in 24 CFR 91.5 Around 30 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed to populations at risk of homelessness. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Supportive services and case management services • Affordable Housing Options • Tenant Based Rental Assistance • Aging populations accessing affordable housing Fleeing, or Attempting to Flee, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, Stalking, or Human Trafficking, as defined by HUD in the Notice Over 48 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed this group of qualifying populations. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Crisis shelters for victims • Staffing and Services • Non-congregate shelter options Other populations requiring services or housing assistance to prevent homelessness and other populations at greatest risk of housing instability as defined by HUD in the Notice Approximately 61 percent of survey respondents indicated that their primary services were directed at other populations requiring services or housing assistance for those at greatest risk of housing instability. Major unmet needs for this group include: • Affordable Housing • Provide Supportive Services Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system: Based on the data provided by the CoC Housing Inventory Count (HIC) and Point in Time Count (2020), there is currently sufficient inventory to match the homeless population, as seen in the above Homeless table. However, this count is a summation 27 of all homeless inventory available to all populations included in the homeless count and does not account for gaps within the total inventory such as needs for specific homeless services and beds. The count also does not include the potential needs for families and individuals at greater risk of homelessness, such as those staying in hotels, doubled up with family, or cars. Those populations may not be counted in some of these numbers and many families under 50% AMI are housing cost burdened, paying over 30% of their income towards rent. Being housing cost burdened increases your likelihood of eviction as one financial emergency can remove the ability to pay rent. The housing inventory gap analysis also shows a surplus in aggregated housing inventory available to households under 50% AMI. However, when only considering households with 0- 30% AMI and the inventory available to these households which are at risk of homelessness, there appears to be a gap of 1,810 units available. This indicates that there is a substantial need in additional affordable housing at the lower level of AMI to better meet the needs of those at risk of homelessness. Under Section IV.4.2.ii.G of the HOME-ARP Notice, a PJ may provide additional characteristics associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness in their HOME- ARP allocation plan. These characteristics will further refine the definition of “other populations” that are “At Greatest Risk of Housing Instability,” as established in the HOME- ARP Notice. If including these characteristics, identify them here: According to CHAS, there are 1,010 households with at least two persons where either one or both are 62 years old or older and have a total household income of less than 50 percent of HAMFI. The Salt Lake School District had a mobility rate of 17.1% among its families in the 2019-2020 school year according to data provided by the Utah State Board of Education. This percentage may have been affected by COVID-19 as the previous 6 school years each had a mobility rate of at least 23.7%. Identify priority needs for qualifying populations: As indicated by the survey results and shown in the graph below, the qualifying population with the highest unmet need is homeless individual or family at 54.04%. 28 Next, when asked to rank the preferred use of HOME-ARP funds for qualifying populations, the creation of affordable rental housing ranked the highest with 52.94%. In addition, when asked whether permanent housing should be expanded to qualifying populations, 97.22% strongly agreed/agreed with the statement. Which Qualifying Population has the Highest Unmet Need? Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Preferred use of HOME-ARP Funds Nonprofit Operating and Capacity Building Assistance Acquisition / Development of Non-Congregate Shelter Units Supportive Services Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) 29 Lastly, when survey respondents commented on any other areas related to the eligible use of HOME-ARP that should be considered as a funding priority, 53.57% indicated housing; of those who indicated housing, the following specific types of housing were mentioned: • Deeply targeted affordable housing – 20% • Senior housing – 13% • Long-term housing – 13% • Supportive housing – 6% • Non-congregate housing – 6% • Sustainable housing – 6% To summarize, the data and survey results conclude the qualifying population with the greatest unmet need is homeless individual or family and the priority need suggests affordable housing should be expanded within the regional area. Explain how the PJ determined the level of need and gaps in the PJ’s shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan: The methodology used in the creation of this HOME-ARP Allocation Plan were derived from various sources, including 2020 and 2021 (Fall) PIT, 2020 HIC, 2014- 2018 CHAS, U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 ACS 5-Year Estimates and through the consultation process with service providers and government entities. HOME-ARP Activities Permanent Housing Should be Expanded to Qualifying Populations Neither agree nor disagree Agree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 30 Describe the method(s)that will be used for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors: Salt Lake City will solicit applications through a competitive application process. This process will be similar to that of the annual HUD funding Salt Lake City receives. Agencies and developers will be able to apply for funding through an application open for a minimum of thirty days. Eligible projects will then go through the public process which includes going before a public City review board, the Mayor, and City Council for final recommendations and approval. During the process Salt Lake City will outreach and collaborate with non-profit agencies, Other Salt Lake City Divisions, the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake, and other local municipalities to maximize the impact of HOME-ARP funding. Describe whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly: Salt Lake City will work with a subrecipient or developer to administer the selected activities. Salt Lake City will provide oversight, but will not administer eligible activities directly. If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds are provided to a subrecipient or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the subrecipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program: This question is not applicable. Salt Lake City Housing Stability has not provided any administrative funds to a subrecipient or contractor. We will provide program oversight and administration of the HOME-ARP funding. While subrecipients will be selected to undertake approved activities, Salt Lake City will not be contracting out the administration of our HOME- ARP grant or program oversight. 31 In accordance with Section V.C.2. of the Notice (page 4), PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME- ARP limits. Use of HOME-ARP Funding Funding Amount Supportive Services (Rental Assistance, Case Management, Victim Services, etc.) $ 0 $ 0 Total HOME ARP Allocation Describe how the PJ will distribute HOME-ARP funds in accordance with its priority needs identified in its needs assessment and gap analysis: The survey and data gathered for Salt Lake City identified deeply affordable housing and case management supportive services as a major need and gap. City Council previously approved $176,659.75 as administration funds for Housing Stability to use for the required consultation process and the creation of the allocation plan. Salt Lake City can use up to $529,979.00 for administration and planning costs which can go to Housing Stability staff that have been working on the allocation plan and will continue to administer the HOME-ARP funding until 2030. To address the need for deeply affordable housing, Salt Lake City will fund the development of affordable rental housing in the amount of $1,501,608.00. Salt Lake City will prioritize the use of these funds for developments that incorporate mixed- income and family housing. This funding can be used in conjunction with a current project, as long as federal requirements are adhered to, for acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of affordable rental housing. All HOME units must be set aside for qualifying populations as defined in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10 to include: individuals or families experiencing homelessness, individuals or families at risk of homelessness, individuals or families fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, victims of human trafficking, individuals or households at risk of housing instability or requiring services to prevent homelessness, and veterans or families 32 with a veteran. All qualifying populations must be considered to comply with HOME- ARP requirements. In addition to development, and to further increase housing options, Salt Lake City will fund rental assistance under Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) in the amount of $ 1,271,302.00 $1,501,608.00. TBRA can be used to fund payments to cover insufficient amounts that the qualifying household cannot pay for housing and housing related costs, such as rental assistance, security deposits, and utilities deposits for qualifying populations. This funding can be used with one or multiple subrecipient nonprofits in the community. Many organizations are already providing these resources but are reaching capacity and the need is much higher than the availability. In addition to TBRA funding, Salt Lake City completed a substantial amendment to allocate $230.306.00 in HOME-ARP funding to Supportive Services, in order to allow for the inclusion of case management services directly related to TBRA funding. Case management is an essential component of TBRA in many local programs, and some agencies awarded HOME-ARP funds cannot absorb these costs elsewhere. This reallocation did not affect the agencies awarded or their total funding awards but will allow a portion of the funds to be used for case management alongside TBRA programs. This would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. Salt Lake City will serve qualifying populations by prioritizing development of affordable housing and TBRA over the other eligible activities based on the community assessment, local legislative priority, and other known resources available within the community. Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities: According to the data gathered and the survey respondents there is a high need in additional affordable housing. There seems to be a gap of 8,935 rental units for individuals and families making at or below 50% AMI. That gap continues to grow in the current economy of increased inflation and increased rental rates that wages are not able to keep up with. Currently Salt Lake City has two of the five homeless resource centers in its incorporated boundary and one domestic violence shelter. To promote housing first and take the survey into consideration, creating deeply affordable housing would address both the housing inventory gap and the current amount of people utilizing the homeless resource centers. The nonprofits that provide rental assistance resources to the qualifying populations 33 state that their staffing capacity is low, due to recruitment challenges and low retention. Funding TBRA would allow for nonprofits to divert other funding resources received to hire or retain staff that are assisting Salt Lake City residents, who meet the definition of a qualifying population, while also providing needed rental assistance. HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation: If Salt Lake City provides $1,501,608.00 in funding for affordable housing developments, it would assist with one to two development projects depending on the need and size of the project. HUD waived the maximum per-unit subsidy for HOME- ARP development dollars. It would be anticipated that a project will be mixed with fair market, high affordability, and low affordability units to sustain the project for at least 15 years. This mix can also include units of varying size, from studio to four bedrooms to accommodate individuals and families. According to the HUD Housing Production Goal Calculation spreadsheet, Salt Lake City estimates producing or supporting 4-8 units for HOME-ARP qualifying populations. Salt Lake City estimates spending between $200,000 and $400,000 of HOME-APR dollars on each deeply affordable HOME unit. That number is based on a recent deeply affordable project as well as accounting for the increasing material and labor costs in the construction market. Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how the production goal will address the PJ’s priority needs: Affordable rental housing production is part of Salt Lake City’s 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan under the goal of housing. This goal is to expand housing options, specifically affordable housing citywide. The 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan identified 5,075 households assisted over the four-year timeframe, which is 1,268 annually (Consolidated Plan SP-45, 2020-2021 Action Plan AP-20). The number identified includes annual CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding for projects like rehabilitation, development, home ownership, and rental assistance. Since this funding would be including development and TBRA it can support the goal of assisting 1,268 household. Based on the 2020-2021 CAPER, it is likely that HOME- ARP will assist in 11 of the rental housing production goal for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 34 Preferences A preference provides a priority for the selection of applicants who fall into a specific QP or category (e.g., elderly or persons with disabilities) within a QP (i.e., subpopulation) to receive assistance. A preference permits an eligible applicant that qualifies for a PJ-adopted preference to be selected for HOME-ARP assistance before another eligible applicant that does not qualify for a preference. A method of prioritization is the process by which a PJ determines how two or more eligible applicants qualifying for the same or different preferences are selected for HOME- ARP assistance. For example, in a project with a preference for chronically homeless, all eligible QP applicants are selected in chronological order for a HOME-ARP rental project except that eligible QP applicants that qualify for the preference of chronically homeless are selected for occupancy based on length of time they have been homeless before eligible QP applicants who do not qualify for the preference of chronically homeless. Please note that HUD has also described a method of prioritization in other HUD guidance. Section I.C.4 of Notice CPD-17-01 describes Prioritization in CoC CE as follows: “Prioritization. In the context of the coordinated entry process, HUD uses the term “Prioritization” to refer to the coordinated entry-specific process by which all persons in need of assistance who use coordinated entry are ranked in order of priority. The coordinated entry prioritization policies are established by the CoC with input from all community stakeholders and must ensure that ESG projects are able to serve clients in accordance with written standards that are established under 24 CFR 576.400(e). In addition, the coordinated entry process must, to the maximum extent feasible, ensure that people with more severe service needs and levels of vulnerability are prioritized for housing and homeless assistance before those with less severe service needs and lower levels of vulnerability. Regardless of how prioritization decisions are implemented, the prioritization process must follow the requirements in Section II.B.3. and Section I.D. of this Notice.” If a PJ is using a CE that has a method of prioritization described in CPD-17-01, then a PJ has preferences and a method of prioritizing those preferences. These must be described in the HOME-ARP allocation plan in order to comply with the requirements of Section IV.C.2 (page 10) of the HOME-ARP Notice. In accordance with Section V.C.4 of the Notice (page 15), the HOME-ARP allocation plan must identify whether the PJ intends to give a preference to one or more 35 qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project. • Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). • The PJ must comply with all applicable nondiscrimination and equal opportunity laws and requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a) and any other applicable fair housing and civil rights laws and requirements when establishing preferences or methods of prioritization. While PJs are not required to describe specific projects in its HOME-ARP allocation plan to which the preferences will apply, the PJ must describe the planned use of any preferences in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. This requirement also applies if the PJ intends to commit HOME- ARP funds to projects that will utilize preferences or limitations to comply with restrictive eligibility requirements of another project funding source. If a PJ fails to describe preferences or limitations in its plan, it cannot commit HOME-ARP funds to a project that will implement a preference or limitation until the PJ amends its HOME-ARP allocation plan. For HOME-ARP rental housing projects, Section VI.B.20.a.iii of the HOME-ARP Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility or give a preference to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation or preference is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. Adding a preference or limitation not previously described in the plan requires a substantial amendment and a public comment period in accordance with Section V.C.6 of the Notice (page 16). Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project: The survey respondents have clearly stated that more deeply affordable housing is needed in Salt Lake City for families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Homeless individuals and families defined in the HOME-ARP Notice, according to ESG and CoC. It is proposed that deeply affordable housing being created would prioritize families and individuals experiencing homelessness. TBRA would not have a prioritization based on qualifying populations and can be open to any agencies that provide an eligible service to any qualifying population. 36 If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: According to the housing inventory numbers previously shown there is a gap in deeply affordable units, for individuals and families making less than 30% AMI. There are currently 4,745 units available to Salt Lake City residents at or under 30% AMI with 6,555 households in Salt Lake City falling under the 30% AMI threshold. That leaves a gap of 1,810 units needed for the current residents. That does not consider the increase in population that Utah and Salt Lake City will likely see over the next five years. Creating deeply affordable housing units and prioritizing families and individuals currently experiencing homelessness will address the gap in housing since most individuals and families experiencing homelessness fall under 30% AMI and are currently priced out of the rising rental market. Referral Methods PJs are not required to describe referral methods in the plan. However, if a PJ intends to use a coordinated entry (CE) process for referrals to a HOME-ARP project or activity, the PJ must ensure compliance with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). A PJ may use only the CE for direct referrals to HOME-ARP projects and activities (as opposed to CE and other referral agencies or a waitlist) if the CE expands to accept all HOME-ARP qualifying populations and implements the preferences and prioritization established by the PJ in its HOME-ARP allocation plan. A direct referral is where the CE provides the eligible applicant directly to the PJ, subrecipient, or owner to receive HOME-ARP TBRA, supportive services, admittance to a HOME-ARP rental unit, or occupancy of a NCS unit. In comparison, an indirect referral is where a CE (or other referral source) refers an eligible applicant for placement to a project or activity waitlist. Eligible applicants are then selected for a HOME- ARP project or activity from the waitlist. The PJ must require a project or activity to use CE along with other referral methods (as provided in Section IV.C.2.ii) or to use only a project/activity waiting list (as provided in Section IV.C.2.iii) if: 1. the CE does not have a sufficient number of qualifying individuals and families to refer to the PJ for the project or activity; 2. the CE does not include all HOME-ARP qualifying populations; or, 3. the CE fails to provide access and implement uniform referral processes in situations 37 where a project’s geographic area(s) is broader than the geographic area(s) covered by the CE If a PJ uses a CE that prioritizes one or more qualifying populations or segments of qualifying populations (e.g., prioritizing assistance or units for chronically homeless individuals first, then prioritizing homeless youth second, followed by any other individuals qualifying as homeless, etc.) then this constitutes the use of preferences and a method of prioritization. To implement a CE with these preferences and priorities, the PJ must include the preferences and method of prioritization that the CE will use in the preferences section of their HOME-ARP allocation plan. Use of a CE with embedded preferences or methods of prioritization that are not contained in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation does not comply with Section IV.C.2 of the Notice (page10). Identify the referral methods that the PJ intends to use for its HOME-ARP projects and activities. PJ’s may use multiple referral methods in its HOME-ARP program. (Optional): Local subrecipients will be required to operate HOME-ARP funded programs with no exclusions in the following way. All TBRA activities will be utilized on a first come, first eligible basis. The Development projects must be required to use a first come, first served basis, unless the family or individual is currently experiencing homelessness. That family or individual currently experiencing homelessness can be prioritized for the HOME units in the project being created. All subrecipients and projects will be required to have a waitlist for the HOME-ARP program. Based on the qualifying population, required documentation will be needed to support the qualifying status. Documentation may include but is not limited to; Utah Homeless Management Information System (UHMIS), Paystubs/ Tax Returns, Case Manager Verification, State Assistance Verification (SNAP, TANF, Unemployment), VA Verification. If the PJ intends to use the coordinated entry (CE) process established by the CoC, describe whether all qualifying populations eligible for a project or activity will be included in the CE process, or the method by which all qualifying populations eligible for the project or activity will be covered. (Optional): Salt Lake City does not intend to use the coordinated entry process established by the CoC since it does not serve all the qualifying populations listed in the HOME-ARP Notice CPD-21-10. If the PJ intends to use the CE process established by the CoC, describe the method of prioritization to be used by the CE. (Optional): Not Applicable If the PJ intends to use both a CE process established by the CoC and another 38 referral method for a project or activity, describe any method of prioritization between the two referral methods, if any. (Optional): Not Applicable Limitations in a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project Limiting eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project is only permitted under certain circumstances. • PJs must follow all applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a). This includes, but is not limited to, the Fair Housing Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, section 504 of Rehabilitation Act, HUD’s Equal Access Rule, and the Americans with Disabilities Act, as applicable. • A PJ may not exclude otherwise eligible qualifying populations from its overall HOME- ARP program. • Within the qualifying populations, participation in a project or activity may be limited to persons with a specific disability only, if necessary, to provide effective housing, aid, benefit, or services that would be as effective as those provided to others in accordance with 24 CFR 8.4(b)(1)(iv). A PJ must describe why such a limitation for a project or activity is necessary in its HOME-ARP allocation plan (based on the needs and gap identified by the PJ in its plan) to meet some greater need and to provide a specific benefit that cannot be provided through the provision of a preference. • For HOME-ARP rental housing, section VI.B.20.a.iii of the Notice (page 36) states that owners may only limit eligibility to a particular qualifying population or segment of the qualifying population if the limitation is described in the PJ’s HOME-ARP allocation plan. • PJs may limit admission to HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS to households who need the specialized supportive services that are provided in such housing or NCS. However, no otherwise eligible individuals with disabilities or families including an individual with a disability who may benefit from the services provided may be excluded on the grounds that they do not have a particular disability. Describe whether the PJ intends to limit eligibility for a HOME-ARP rental housing or NCS project to a particular qualifying population or specific subpopulation of a qualifying population identified in section IV.A of the Notice: Salt Lake City does not intend to limit eligibility for HOME-ARP rental housing. If a PJ intends to implement a limitation, explain why the use of a limitation is necessary to address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or subpopulation of 39 qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis: Not Applicable If a limitation was identified, describe how the PJ will address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the limitation through the use of HOME-ARP funds (i.e., through another of the PJ’s HOME-ARP projects or activities): Not Applicable 40 EXHIBIT: Summary of Public Comment SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS The first Public Comment Period was a hybrid meeting held May 22, 2022, through June 8, 2022, with a Public Hearing hosted by Housing Stability on June 1, 2022. There were no comments received during the Public Comment period or the Public Hearing. This Public Comment Period was an opportunity for the public to review and give feedback on an initial draft of the HOME-ARP Community Assessment and Allocation Plan. A second Public Comment Period will be held February 7, 2023, through March 21, 2023, with a second Public Hearing on February 21, 2023. After this period, received public comments will be reviewed and included in the final submission to HUD of the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. All Public Comment Notices are posted in English and Spanish on the State’s Public Notice website, printed in a newspaper of general circulation, sent to community partners to post, and provided to the Mayor’s Office and the Council Office for dissemination on social media platforms and other applicable forms of electronic communication and noticing. This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst DATE:September 9, 2025 RE: Alley Vacation – 1470 East 1300 South (PLNPCM2025-00219) ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate an approximately 12-foot by 535-foot alley segment between about 1430 East and 1500 East, and between 1300 South and Sherman Avenue in City Council District Six. The alley is impassable, blocked by numerous garages, fences and walls. Historical records show several structures have been encroaching on the alley property since at least 1950. It is unclear if the alley ever existed other than on paper. If approved by the City Council, the alley property would be divided in half and given to the abutting property owners. The Planning Commission reviewed this petition at its July 9, 2025 meeting and held a public hearing at which one person spoke expressing concern that dividing the alley property equally between abutting owners rather than where encroachments are located may lead to conflicts between property owners. Planning staff recommended and the Planning Commission voted 5-3 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed alley vacation. One Commissioner who voted against the proposal felt it did not meet the lack of use standard because it was self-imposed by building structures that encroach on the alley. Other Commissioners who were opposed did not indicate why. Goal of the briefing: Review the alley closure and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. Item Schedule: Page | 2 Aerial image the subject alley segment outlined in yellow. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITIONAL INFORMATION There are 25 properties abutting the alley segment as shown in the image above. Four properties west of the subject segment are not included in the proposed vacation as three of those use the alley for access to their property. A north/south segment connecting the alley to 1300 South and Sherman Avenue is also not included in the request. Whether the Council votes to vacate the alley or not, there is risk of property owners being enforced upon for encroaching into the alley. If the alley is not vacated and encroachment is reported to City Civil Enforcement, the property owner(s) would be required to correct the encroachment. If the alley is vacated and divided between property owners, there is potential for dispute between property owners over encroachments. That would be a civil matter between owners, and the City would not be involved. City Department Review Attachment I (page 41) of the Planning Commission staff report includes comments from City department review of the proposal. These are summarized below. Please see the staff report for additional information. The Engineering Division does not support the proposed alley vacation citing potential future access needs, and utility easements. They said Rocky Mountain Power has power poles in the alley and will need access to them. (Staff note: it is unclear how Rocky Mountain Power previously accessed the poles through the alley if there have been encroachments for at least 75 years.) If the alley is vacated by the Council, any existing rights-of-way and easements would remain. No other responding department or division expressed concerns with the proposal. Page | 3 KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified four key considerations during analysis of these proposals which are found on pages 3-5 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – Property Owner Consent City code requires a minimum of 75% of property owners abutting alleys being considered for vacation sign a petition expressing support. There are 25 properties abutting the subject alley segment and 21 (84%) are supportive, exceeding the minimum requirement. Consideration 2 – Policy Considerations Planning staff found the proposed alley vacation satisfies the Lack of Use policy consideration included in the table below. Consideration 3 – Community Plan Considerations Planning staff reviewed how the proposed alley vacation aligns with the East Bench General Plan and Plan Salt Lake. Planning found that the East Bench General Plan “does not include any specific direction on the public alleys within the plan area. Vacating this alley will not impact the way the neighborhood residents access their properties.” Plan Salt Lake supports connectivity and circulation within neighborhoods. Alleys can help provide these connections, but the subject alley has not been used for at least 75 years and is not currently usable. Consideration 4 – Neighbor Concerns About Property Line Disputes Planning was contacted by some neighbors expressing concern about potential property line disputes if the alley is vacated and alley property divided between abutting neighbors. The concern is structures, fences, or walls encroaching on what would be a neighbor’s property could lead to these disputes. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Factor Finding 14.52.020 - The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A - Lack of Use- The City’s legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on-site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way. B - Public Safety- The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity Complies Planning staff found the alley vacation request is consistent with policy consideration A – Lack of Use. Page | 4 or unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area. C - Urban Design- The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element. D - Community Purpose- The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. Section 14.52.030.B Salt Lake City Code directs the Planning Division to analyze factors in the following table. Planning staff found the proposed alley meets all eight factors. Factor Planning Staff Finding The City Police Department, Fire Department, Transportation Division, and all other relevant City Departments and Divisions have no objection to the proposed disposition of the property. Complies Though the Engineering Division is not supportive of the alley vacation, noting the need for Rocky Mountain Power to access its power poles. Planning contacted the power company for feedback but did not receive comments. Based on the lack of response, and the fact that alley access has been blocked for decades, Planning believes it is safe to assume the power poles have been accessed from residents’ properties. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above. Complies with Policy Consideration A – Lack of Use. The petition must not deny sole access or required off- street parking to any adjacent property. Complies The petition will not result in any property being landlocked. Complies The disposition of the alley property will not result in a use which is otherwise contrary to the policies of the City, including applicable master plans and other adopted statements of policy which address, but which are not limited to, mid-block walkways, pedestrian paths, trails, and alternative transportation uses. Complies No opposing abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the property, or has made application for a building permit, or if such a permit has been issued, construction has been completed within 12 months of issuance of the building permit. Complies The petition furthers the City preference for disposing of an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; and Complies Planning reasoned that because the proposal vacates most of the alley rather than a small segment of it, this factor is satisfied. The alley is optional for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory uses. Complies PROJECT CHRONOLOGY April 7, 2025 – Petition submitted to Salt Lake City Planning Division. Page | 5 April 24, 2025 – Petition assigned to Seth Rios, Principal Planner. May 6, 2025 – o Notification sent to the Wasatch Hollow Community Council. KEEPYalecrest Community Council, and Yalecrest Neighborhood Council. o 45-day input period begins. o Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the alley were provided early notice of the proposal. June 27, 2025 – o Public hearing notice signs were posted on the property. o Public hearing notices were mailed by the Planning Division. o Public hearing notices were posted on the City and State websites, and posted on the Planning Division listserv. July 9, 2025 – Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing The Commission voted 5-3 to in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval. July 29, 2025 – Ordinance requested from Attorney’s Office August 5, 2025 – Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office. August 28, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. ALLEY CLOSURE PROCESS The alley closure process is dictated by Chapter 14.52 Salt Lake City Code which is included below for reference. 14.52.010: DISPOSITION OF CITY'S PROPERTY INTEREST IN ALLEYS: The City supports the legal disposition of Salt Lake City's real property interests, in whole or in part, with regard to City owned alleys, subject to the substantive and procedural requirements set forth herein. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.020: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR CLOSURE, VACATION OR ABANDONMENT OF CITY OWNED ALLEYS: The City will not consider disposing of its interest in an alley, in whole or in part, unless it receives a petition in writing which demonstrates that the disposition satisfies at least one of the following policy considerations: A. Lack Of Use: The City's legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; B. Public Safety: The existence of the alley is substantially contributing to crime, unlawful activity, unsafe conditions, public health problems, or blight in the surrounding area; C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; or D. Community Purpose: The petitioners are proposing to restrict the general public from use of the alley in favor of a community use, such as a neighborhood play area or garden. (Ord. 24-02 § 1, 2002) 14.52.030: PROCESSING PETITIONS: There will be three (3) phases for processing petitions to dispose of City owned alleys under this section. Those phases include an administrative determination of completeness; a public hearing, including a recommendation from the Planning Commission; and a public hearing before the City Council. A. Administrative Determination Of Completeness: The City administration will determine whether or not the petition is complete according to the following requirements: 1. The petition must bear the signatures of no less than seventy five percent (75%) of the neighbors owning property which abuts the subject alley property; 2. The petition must identify which policy considerations discussed above support the petition; 3. The petition must affirm that written notice has been given to all owners of property located in the block or blocks within which the subject alley property is located; 4. A signed statement that the applicant has met with and explained the proposal to the appropriate community organization entitled to receive notice pursuant to title 2, chapter 2.60 of this Code; and Page | 6 5. The appropriate City processing fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule has been paid. 14.52.040: METHOD OF DISPOSITION: 14.52.050: PETITION FOR REVIEW: Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council Work Session–September 9, 2025 PLNPCM2025-00219 ALLEY VACATION AT 1300 SOUTH // SHERMAN AVENUE Salt Lake City //Planning Division Alley Vacation •Most of the east/west alley •Approximately 12 ft x 535 ft •21 of the 25 abutting property owners have consented to the alley vacation (84%) RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council. REQUEST Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning HISTORY OF ALLEY •Platted in 1910 •Few alleys remain public in the general vicinity of this alley •Inaccessible due to fencing and overgrown vegetation Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ALLEY VACATION REQUESTS -CHAPTER 14.52.020 Must fulfill at least one of the following considerations: •Lack of Use •Public Safety •Urban Design •Community Purpose STANDARDS OF APPROVAL Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ALLEY ENTRANCES West Entrance East Entrance Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning LACK OF USE •Unsure if alley was ever used •Limited accessibility, current condition, and presence of structures, vegetation, and utility poles within the alley Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ALLEY VACATION PROCESS PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: •Positive •Positive with Additional Conditions •Negative CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: •Approval •Approval with Conditions •Denial IF APPROVED: •Conveyance of land to abutting property owners Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Seth Rios // Principal Planner seth.rios@slc.gov 801-535-7758 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/21/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/28/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Seth Rios E-mail Seth.Rios@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/27/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/28/2025 Subject: Alley Vacation at 1470 East 1300 South Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Seth Rios- seth.rios@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Approval Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process The Planning Commission recommended approval. The City Council needs to vote on the proposal. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Philip Wilkes, owner of 1470 East 1300 South, has requested to vacate a portion of the alley located between lots 1-20 and lots 39-58 of the Liberty Heights Plat. The applicant has requested the vacation due to various structures and vegetation in the alley, as well as an overall lack of use. The subject alley was created as part of the Liberty Heights Plat, which was recorded in 1910. The alley is approximately 535 feet in length and 12 feet in width. The entire block of the alley is zoned R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential and residential in nature. The portion of the alley, outlined in yellow below, is not utilized for access by any abutting property and is obstructed at multiple points. Various structures, including utility poles, garages and sheds, and walls or fences, impede access and block the ability to utilize the alley. Alley vacation requests are required to have the signed consent of at least 75% of the abutting property owners. The applicant has provided the signed consent of 84% of the abutting property owners. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification o May 6, 2025 – The Wasatch Hollow Community Council, KEEPYalecrest Community Council, and Yalecrest Neighborhood Council were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations.. o May 6, 2025 – Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the alley were provided with early notification of the proposal. o June 27, 2025 – Public hearing notice signs were posted on the property by staff. o June 27, 2025 – Public hearing notices were mailed by the Planning Division. o June 27, 2025 – Public hearing notices were posted on the City and State websites, and posted on the Planning Division list serve. • Planning Commission Meeting o July 9, 2025 – The Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the alley and held a public hearing regarding the matter. The Commission voted 5 to 3 in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval. Planning Commission (PC) Records 1) Planning Commission Agenda of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) 2) PC Minutes of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) 3) Planning Commission Staff Report of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Vacating a city-owned alley located between lots 1-20 and lots 39-58 of the Liberty Heights Plat) An ordinance vacating an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to lots 1-20 and lots 39-58 of the Liberty Heights Plat, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00219. WHEREAS the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on July 9, 2025 to consider a request made by Philip Wilkes, an adjacent property owner, to vacate an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to lots 1-20 and lots 39-58 of the Liberty Heights Plat; and WHEREAS, at its July 9, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation of the alley and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed city-owned alley, which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this alley, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Condition. This alley vacation is conditioned upon its disposition being consistent with the method of disposition set forth in Section 14.52.040. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The city recorder is instructed not to publish or record this ordinance until the condition identified above has been met. SECTION 5. Time. If the condition identified above has not been met within one year after adoption, this ordinance shall become null and void. Prior to such one year period, the City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the condition identified above. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025 Published: ______________. Ordinance Vacating Alley Near Sherman Avenue and 1300 South APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:____8/5/25_________________________ By: _/s/ Courtney Lords____________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the unnamed city-owned alley to be vacated: This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNPCM2025-00219 April 7, 2025 Petition submitted by Philip Wilkes, property owner of 1470 East 1300 South April 24, 2025 Petition was deemed complete. April 24, 2025 Petition was assigned to Seth Rios, Principal Planner. May 6, 2025 The Wasatch Hollow Community Council, KEEPYalecrest Community Council, and Yalecrest Neighborhood Council were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. May 6, 2025 Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the alley were provided early notification of the proposal. June 27, 2025 Public hearing notice signs were posted on the property by staff. June 27, 2025 Public hearing notices were mailed by the Planning Division. June 27, 2025 Public hearing notices were posted on the City and State websites, and posted on the Planning Division list serve. July 9, 2025 Planning Commission reviewed the proposal and held a public hearing. The Commission voted 5-3 in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval. July 29, 2025 Draft ordinance requested from the City Attorney’s office. August 5, 2025 Ordinance received from the City Attorney’s office. This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00219. Philip Wilkes, owner of 1470 East 1300 South, has requested to vacate a portion of the alley located between lots 1-20 and lots 39-50 of Liberty Heights Plat. The subject alley is located within Council District 6, represented by Dan Dugan. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Seth Rios at 801-535-7758 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at seth.rios@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00219. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, (801)535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. ORIGINAL PETITION Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Alley Vacation of Block 1 Liberty Heights Overview We are requesting a partial vacation of the east/west alley of Block 1 Liberty Heights (1400 E block between 1300 S and Sherman Ave). We are planning to build a new garage and, in talking to the Planning Division, were informed that the back 6 feet of our lot is owned by the city for an alley. We would like to have the garage sit on the current alley property to allow for better egress of vehicles and to keep a tree that provides great shade. The only legal way to have the garage closer to the rear of our lot is to vacate the alley property. Property owners abutting the alley are largely supportive of the vacation as most assumed it was their property and 18 of the 29 abutting properties have structures built on alley land. Vacating the alley would put these owners in better legal standing. Alley Location and Historical Use When our block was laid out in the early 1900’s, a 12’ strip of land running east-west was set aside to be given to the city to use as an alley, see Figures 2 and 3. The east/west alley property runs from 1500 E to another alley which runs north/south at approximately 1420 E between 1300 S and Sherman Ave. Currently an alley only exists at the western end and goes in one lot before terminating in the backyards of 1427 E Sherman Ave and 1430 E 1300 S which both have structures that materially block the alley. The 1950 Sanborn Fire map (Figure 1) reflects today’s reality and shows that no other portions of the alley existed at that time. No evidence of other portions of the alley being developed has been found. We propose vacating the alley from its eastern terminus at 1500 E to the western edge of lots 22 and 37 of Block 1 Liberty Height as seen on the Block 11, 5-Acre Plat C map (see Figures 2 thru 4). These lots correspond to the western halves of the properties 1427 E Sherman Ave and 1430 E 1300 S. Figure 1: Portion of Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Salt Lake City, 1950: Sheet 319 showing Block 1 Liberty Heights with all structures and the alley way as of 1950. Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Support for Alley Vacation We have been able to collect signatures from over 75% of the property owners whose properties abut the alley. We have given written information about our proposed alley vacation to all the property owners on the block including those whose properties do not abut the alley as per the recommendations from our pre-submittal meeting. While we have not reached 100% support for the vacation no one has been outright hostile to getting rid of the alley. Policy-based Justification for Alley Vacation The vacation meets two of the four considerations in Section 14.52.020: Policy Considerations as outlined below. For reference those policy requirements are included in italicized font. A. Lack of Use: The City’s legal interest in the property appears of record or is reflected on an applicable plat; however, it is evident from an on site inspection that the alley does not physically exist or has been materially blocked in a way that renders it unusable as a public right-of-way; The City’s ownership of the alley is shown on the Block 11, 5-Acrre Plat C map but an alley only physically exists between two properties, 1424 E 1300 S and 1421 E Sherman Ave. Based on the 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Sheet 319, the current extent of the alley has been the same for at least the last 75 years, see Figure 1. The eastern terminus is blocked a garage and western end is blocked by structures at 1427 E Sherman Ave and 1430 E 1300 S. These structures, or the ones preceding them, have blocked either end of the alley for at least 75 years. Of the 29 properties abutting the proposed partial vacated alley, 18 of them have structures on the alley land with some of them being constructed in the 1920’s. Furthermore, fencing separating the properties have been built along the entire length of the alley way. Additionally, Rock Mountain Power has placed 5 utility poles on the alley property further blocking the use of the land as an alley way. The number and age of the structures built on the alley way suggests that the city long ago abandoned the idea of making the alley a usable public right-of-way. e Figure 2: Portion of Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, Salt Lake City, 1950: Sheet 319 showing Block 1 Liberty Heights with all structures and the alley way as of 1950. Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 C. Urban Design: The continuation of the alley does not serve as a positive urban design element; The alley does not serve a positive urban design element for most of the block because it largely physically does not exist. Our proposed partial vacation would allow continued access to the two properties that have a practical use for the alley as it currently exists. As for the remaining properties, home owners and builders long ago made the decision that individual driveways were a better design solution than a shared alleyway for the block. This may be due to the elevation change of 39’ over the length of the alleyway meaning lots differ in height by an average of 3’ both east to west and north to south. These differences in elevation between lots do not lend themselves to an alleyway as significant land grading and partly subterranean garages would be required to make it work for both sides of the alley. The steepness of the alley along with alleys being a low priority for snow removal after winter storms would make the alley difficult to use in the winter months. (Vehicles often get stuck on the 1400 E block of 1300 S during snow storms despite it being one of the first streets in the neighborhood to get plowed.) It should be noted that the portion of the alley that does exist is nearly level which may be why it was developed. For all these reasons we believe that the alley portion that we propose to vacate does not serve a positive urban design element and its development into an actually alley going forward is not practical. 14.52.030 Factors Considered 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal; This will accomplished through the application process. 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated above; As demonstrated above, this petition meets at least two policy consideration. 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property; We have worked with all the home owners to ensure continued access to properties where access currently exists via the alley. Our partial vacation of the alley would maintain access to the two properties that currently use it. 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked; We have worked with all the home owners to ensure continued access to properties where access currently exists via the alley. Our partial vacation of the alley would maintain access to the two properties who currently use it. 5. The vacation will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City; I do not see this being the case. The alley property is likely to be continued to be used as it is now, a continuation of people’s yards. 6. No abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the alley; No homeowner expressed this concern. The one property that has access to the current alley and does not have a garage on their property would maintain access to the remaining alley. Both property owners have expressed willingness to sign a shared driveway agreement to allow each other access to their respective properties. All other properties have a driveway to access a garage. Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 7. The petition is for an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it; The alley vacation is for a large portion of the alley. A small segment would remain to allow access to the two properties which currently use it. 8. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. The alley is only used to access the rear of two properties and that access will be maintained if the vacation is done as requested. From a historical perspective, there is precedence in the neighborhood for vacating the alley. The Block 11, 5-Acre Plat C map laid out 18 blocks including ours. Of these blocks, 14 were laid out with an east/west alley and 9 of those have been fully vacated and another 2 have been partially vacated. That leaves 3 remaining east/west alleys: 2 of which that physically exist and are well used by the surrounding owners and ours, which has apparently never existed more than between two lots. A partial vacation of the east/west alley on Block 1 Liberty Heights would correct the historical oversite of not vacating the alley years ago. It would allow homeowners to use their lots as they see fit, allowing them to build structures where it makes the most sense for them. Thank you, Philip Wilkes Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Written Description of Proposed Alley Vacation The proposed portion of the alley to be vacated is 585’ in length from east to west and 12.1” in width from north to south. (Measurements based on those given on the Block 11, 5-Acre Plat C and the Salt Lake County Assessor’s Parcel Finder website.) The alley is bounded to the north by properties 16-09- 357-005-0000 through 16-09-357-017-0000 and to the south by properties 16-09-357-023-0000 through 16-09-357-036-0000. The eastern edge is 1500 E and the western edge aligns with the western edges of properties 16-09-357-023-0000 and 16-09-357-005-0000. The 50’ length portion of the alley between 16-09-357-004-0000 and 16-09-357-022-0000 would remain as a public alley to permit access to the two properties that currently utilize it. Visual Representations of Proposed Alley Vacation Figure 3: The proposed partial alley vacation is shown in yellow on the Salt Lake County Assessors map along with green dots showing the property owners who support the alley vacation. Additionally this map shows most of the structures built on the alley land. Figure 4 Proposed partial alley vacation on Block 1 of Liberty Heights shown in yellow on Block 11, 5-Acre Plat C F.M. Lyman Jr’s Survey. Note the 25’ wide lots do not correspond all correspond to current property lines. Properties on the block are made up of 2-3 lots ranging from 37.5’ to 52’. Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Figure 5: Historic Block 11, 5-Acre Plat C and Block 11, F.M. Lyman JR's Survey of Survey of Sec 16, T1S, R1E. highlighting the prevelance of vacated alleys in the surrounding neighborhood. Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Signatures Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 Meetings from Wasatch Hollow Community Council showing Alley Vacation was presented to appropriate community organization Wasatch Hollow Community Council https://wasatchhollowcc.org/ Minutes for the meeting of February 26, 2025 Anderson-Foothill Library, 1135 S 2100 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 Board members present: John Rosswog, Chair and Treasurer; Marley Bramble, 2nd Vice-Chair; Tim Komlos, Secretary Number of community members in attendance: Twelve 6:35 Chairperson John Rosswog called the meeting to order and made these announcements: • Minutes of January 22nd WHCC meeting approved unanimously. • Councilman Dan Dugan has stopped attending our monthly meetings in favor of holding quarterly Town Hall meetings. He’ll be tracking the Legislature through their sessions (which ends March 7th) advocating for SLC. • Collection of yard waste in the brown bins resumes the first of March. 6:40 Presentation District 6 Community Liaison, Hannah Barton • Food microgrants are available for individuals or community organizations with a garden to grow their own food. Find information and applications here: www.slc.gov/sustainability/community- food-microgrant/ • The City’s Indoor Air Quality Program provides residents with education and resources to keep their indoor air healthy. Apply to receive high efficiency furnace filters, a portable air purifier, or even a countertop induction range. Find information, clean-air tips and applications at https://www.slc.gov/sustainability/indoor-air/ • The City’s 27-point Public Safety Action Plan goes way beyond supporting the police department with additional funding and programs. It includes greater assistance to the homeless population, better availability of affordable housing, and collaborating with downtown merchants and activists as well as neighboring cities. Since public safety is an issue statewide, the Plan also spells out 23 action items that depend on Utah state and other Utah cities to fund and realize. See the plan in its entirety at https://www.slc.gov/publicsafetyplan/ • The City is improving local neighborhood streets for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, and roll with Neighborhood Byways. These routes make active transportation safer and more convenient by encouraging safe travel speeds, discouraging cut-through traffic, improving crosswalks, and connecting key destinations. The Westminster – Kensington byway will provide a route from Westminster University to Sunnyside Park. See the plan at https://www.slc.gov/transportation/neighborhood-byways/kensington/ and see the entire plan for all of the City’s byways at https://www.slc.gov/transportation/neighborhood-byways/ • If you have questions about these items or what else goes on in the City, ask Hannah at Hannah.Barton@slc.gov Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 7:00 WHCC Treasurer’s Report from John Rosswog • In 2024 we had $2,124 in expenses and received $2,931 from the Arts, Culture and Entertainment (ACE) Grant and from personal donations from Wasatch Hollow residents and merchants. We greatly appreciate those individuals who have given of themselves to help finance our activities and strengthen our community. • Wasatch Hollow has been awarded for 2025, an ACE Grant from the City to hold our annual Hollow Fest celebration. • Due to changes in the City ordinances, expenses for 2025 will need to include premiums for Directors and Officers Indemnity insurance and Hollow Fest event insurance. 7:10 Wasatch Hollow Community Council Board Elections • The five Board member positions were open to new people with an interest in serving their community. o John Rosswog was nominated as Chair and voted into office by acclaim o No one was willing or available for the 1st Vice-Chair office, so it remains open o Marley Bramble was nominated as 2nd Vice-Chair and voted into office by acclaim o No one was willing or available for the Treasurer office, so it remains open o Tim Komlos was nominated as Secretary and voted into office by acclaim • Since nominees to Board positions must be present to accept nomination, we’ll look for nominees for the two remaining spots and vote on them at the next WHCC meeting. If YOU would like to join the WHCC Board, please send us an email to: whccadmin@wasatchhollowcc.org 7:25 Presentation by resident Phillip Wilkes • Mr. Wilkes, who lives in the 1400 E block between 1300 South and Sherman Ave is working to convert the property held in the 12-foot-wide utility easement behind the homes of that block from City property to property owned by the individual property owners. This action is not uncommon in our city where the former alleys have largely been fenced off over time by the property owners and their sections reverted back to them by usage. He wants to use the six feet that would be added so he can build a garage. • The City instructed Mr. Wilkes to inform our council to gather criticism or comments on his project. Meeting attendees had a few questions, but there were no negative comments. Mr. Wilkes can be contacted at: pawilkes@gmail.com 7:40 Meeting adjourned Alley Vacation Petition: Block 1 Liberty Heights Philip Wilkes and Alana Jonat, 1470 E 1300 S, SLC, UT 84105 References Salt Lake County Assessor’s Parcel Viewer: used to gather maps and measure distances https://apps.saltlakecounty.gov/assessor/new/ParcelViewer/index.html?query=Parcel_Viewer_external _3634_5,parcel_id,# Salt Lake County Assessor’s Parcel Search: used to gather information on structures built on lots, size, age, etc. https://apps.saltlakecounty.gov/assessor/new/query.cfm Salt Lake City Maps: Used to find and view plat map of neighborhood; ours is “Block 11, 5-Acre Plat “C” “ https://maps.slc.gov/mws/atlasplats-lg.htm Sanborn Fire Maps, 1950/1951: Volume 3, Page 319: These maps are available on the University of Utah Marriot Library and show land usage and buildings from the past. Searching “1950 Sanborn Page 319” will get you the relevant map. (For some reason there are two sets of maps, one set is has the maps listed as 1950 and the other 1951 although the maps look identical). The Page 356 of the 1926 map also shows the block. On this map the alley is shown as unblocked with the garage at 1427 E Sherman being right on the edge of the alley land. It is unclear if the structure on the back of 1427 E Sherman Ave is the same in both the 1926 and 1951 maps or if it’s location and that of the alley is off on one of the maps. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/browse/institutions#dha Equators Studio: This is a website that I used to estimate the elevation change of the block. https://maps.equatorstudios.com/ Salt Lake City Pubic Alleys https://www.slc.gov/engineering/public-alley-map/ This map shows all the public alley ways in Salt Lake City. An interesting take away is to notice how few alleys, partially those running east/west, exist east of 1100 E. This may be due to the challenges of having alleys in hilly areas of the city. Wasatch Hollow Community Council Meeting minutes from February 26, 2025 https://wasatchhollowcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Minutes_of_Meeting_of_02-26-25.pdf This page has intentionally been left blank 5. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unitOWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIPMARK S HOLLEN; JANICE L HOLLEN (TC) HOLLEN (TC)1380 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JOLEEN S P MANTAS TRUST 10/10/2007 10/10/2007 1392 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TIMOTHY S DUERLER & AMY J DUERLER REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT 11/06 1402 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JODY L HOWE JODY L HOWE 1408 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SCOTT HOKE MARTIN HOKE MARTIN 1418 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ERIC W POVILUS; KIMBERLY A POVILUS (JT) OVILUS (JT)1428 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105PAUL D HANSEEN L D HANSEEN 1436 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105GEOFFREY M RUCKEL; JENNIFER RUCKEL (JT) RUCKEL (JT)1440 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1450 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105CAROL MCKNIGHT TRUST 01/25/2013; RICHARD SHANE MCKNIGHT TRUST 08/1375 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KSLC PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 50 W BROADWAY ST # 333 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101DAVID L CLICK VID L CLICK 1387 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ERIN J FAULKNER J FAULKNER 1045 N 4TH ST FARGO ND 58102GABLE HOMES LLC E HOMES LLC 1218 E 7800 S SANDY UT 84094FELICIA LEE FELICIA LEE 1409 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105PATRICK RENNIE CONNELL NIE CONNELL 1413 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105WILLIAM L JR CARR (SURV) CARR (SURV)1417 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1421 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105NANCY BIVENS ANCY BIVENS 1429 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105BARNES FAMILY TRUST 05/22/2024 05/22/2024 1433 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105DEBRA A LAWLER RA A LAWLER 3267 E 3300 S MILLCREEK UT 84109KATHLEEN GARCIA LEEN GARCIA 1437 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JOHN Q PHILLIPS Q PHILLIPS 1447 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KURTH-POSNER LIVING TRUST 04/21/2009 04/21/2009 1457 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RICHARD TAYLOR HARD TAYLOR 2209 S BROADMOOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1304 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105AKW FAM TR AKW FAM TR 1308 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ELLY MURPHY; PETER MURPHY (JT) MURPHY (JT)9485 S BRAENEAR CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009BRADLEY JOHNSTON; ANDREA J JOHNSTON (JT) HNSTON (JT)1318 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105COLIN W. NEXHIP; SUZANNE J. NEXHIP (JT) NEXHIP (JT)1001 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ALAYNE D MARKLAND D MARKLAND 1328 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JOHN RYAN BYERLY; SABINE KOST-BYERLY (JT) BYERLY (JT)1386 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105THOMAS EIICHIRO MIOTKE; RACHEL ALICE SMITH (JT) SMITH (JT)1404 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RONALD C ALIAGA; BRITTANY L ALIAGA (JT) ALIAGA (JT)1410 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RODNEY WARDLE; TAMIA WARDLE (JT) WARDLE (JT)1416 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JEFFREY B DYKES REY B DYKES 1424 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KARL E SCHWEDE; ELLEN N SCHWEDE (JT) CHWEDE (JT)1430 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105DANIEL STEELE; JENNY STEELE (JT) STEELE (JT)1436 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ROBERT S MEANLEY; RENAE L MEANLEY (JT) EANLEY (JT)1440 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SAMUAL J DUNN MUAL J DUNN 1444 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 841052012 SWC TRUST 2 SWC TRUST 1452 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105NATHANIEL J FERRE; CARLY SHIELDS FERRE (JT) FERRE (JT)1456 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JAMIE LINN NIELSEN; DANIEL NICHOLAS ORD (JT) AS ORD (JT)1462 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RACHEL E HAISLEY L E HAISLEY 1321 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105W&JAH F TRUST JAH F TRUST 1327 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RICHARD T MURDOCK; RUTH M MURDOCK (JT) URDOCK (JT)1421 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ALLI STRAUBHAR; JOSHUA LEE (JT) UA LEE (JT)1427 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SANDRA L BARRON; JAMES M BARRON ES M BARRON PO BOX 1193 RIVERTON UT 84065CYNTHIA & NEAL HASKINS LIVING TRUST 05/17/2019 05/17/2019 1439 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SHELLY LEE ANDERSON EE ANDERSON 1441 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ALICE ANN LARA CE ANN LARA 1445 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LIN C HSU; TIFFANY HSU (JT) NY HSU (JT)3050 COAST RD SANTA CRUZ CA 95060TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1455 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SBPT SBPT 1461 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JACK BECKER LONG; JANICE L LEE ANICE L LEE 1619 RADCLIFFE RD LIVERMORE CA 94550JEANNE M HIGGINS E M HIGGINS 1404 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SUELO LLYA VASH; MATTHEW D MITKO HEW D MITKO 1408 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JANET E HAWS ANET E HAWS 1414 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1420 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED PO BOX 526394 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152JOSEPH P MURRAY; HELEN A H MURRAY (JT) MURRAY (JT)PO BOX 520856 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152TERESA SILCOX FAMILY TRUST 06/15/2009 06/15/2009 1438 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KASEY HENSON; DUSTIN VOHS DUSTIN VOHS 159 E ANNUAL WY VINEYARD UT 84059JANET SANDOR ANET SANDOR 1448 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RYAN & LAURA GEER LIVING TRUST 12/22/2022 12/22/2022 1452 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1381 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1391 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1397 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1435 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1412 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1314 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1322 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 Current Occupant 1435 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1453 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1315 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1428 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1432 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1444 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105DFL TRUST DFL TRUST 1456 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TESSA LIANE JONES; ALEKSANDRA OPARA (JT) OPARA (JT)1463 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105DOUGLAS ROY BIEGGI; LESLIE M BIEGGI (JT) BIEGGI (JT)1465 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105BRYAN T WALSH; COLLEEN MCNAMARA-WALSH (JT) -WALSH (JT)1466 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105SOPHIA NESTER; DOUG NESTER; JULIE NESTER (JT) NESTER (JT)1465 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RIDLEY L HEYREND; CAROL-ANNE WRIGHT (JT) WRIGHT (JT)1458 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105UINTAH INVESTMENT INVESTMENT 2885 S MAIN ST SOUTH SALT LAKEUT 84115TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3310 BAKER DR OGDEN UT 84403PHILIP A WILKES; ALANA M JONAT (JT) JONAT (JT)1470 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105CAMARIE STEPHENSON STEPHENSON 1476 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JAMES BREEZE AMES BREEZE 1473 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105VICKIE S GREAVES; GARY R GREAVES (JT) REAVES (JT)1462 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1458 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1467 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105WILLIAM H BRECKENRIDGE; JULIE ANN V BRECKENRIDGE (JT) NRIDGE (JT)1470 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105COTTAGE RENTAL VENTURES, LLC NTURES, LLC 391 N VIRGINIA ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103BRIAN HEATON MILNE EATON MILNE 1480 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LINDA S THOMAS DA S THOMAS 1477 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JAMES JR CRAIG; KIMBERLY ESTES-CRAIG (JT) -CRAIG (JT)1466 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1475 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KARLY GREENWOOD NIELSEN; DAVID NIELSEN (JT) IELSEN (JT)1401 E PRINCETON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RICHARD BRULE; JESSICA GALIOTO-GREBE (JT) -GREBE (JT)1232 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105CHERI SANGUINETTI; ERIK TILES (JT) TILES (JT)1238 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105PAUL STICCA PAUL STICCA 1486 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105EASTHOPE LIVING TRUST 01/18/2019 01/18/2019 148 ARLENE DR WALNUT CREEK CA 94595PAUL A HEFTI; MAUREEN HEFTI (JT) HEFTI (JT)1472 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1474 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1483 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105S LEVI WILSON LEVI WILSON 1224 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105HARVARD PLUM LLC RD PLUM LLC 1468 E HARVARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105MARIA VILLA TRUST 10/16/2023 10/16/2023 1320 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KARLA D KNOOP RLA D KNOOP 1326 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1478 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1496 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1318 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KATHARINE A DALTON; ANDREW S DALTON (JT) DALTON (JT)1218 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105STEVE R LOEWY; JENNIFER A LOEWY (JT) LOEWY (JT)1342 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105COLIN L REID OLIN L REID 1480 E LAIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LENNA C HABBESHAW; STEVE A KUSABA (JT) KUSABA (JT)1348 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105BOARD OF EDUCATION SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DIST SCHOOL DIST 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111WESTMORELAND LLC ORELAND LLC 1334 E WILSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1571 E 1300 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1321 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ANTONIUS TSAI; ANGELA T FAGERLIN (JT) GERLIN (JT)1325 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105EAST LOGAN, LLC LOGAN, LLC 1200 S BONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108Current Occupant 1341 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LORENA RIFFO-JENSON IFFO-JENSON 1347 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LANGVARD FAMILY TRUST 02/14/2025 02/14/2025 1525 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105HELEN S MACEY; JOEL S MACEY (JT) MACEY (JT)1540 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KATHERINE NEWMAN LEWIS; MICHAEL WITLOCK REMER LEWIS (JT) LEWIS (J 1344 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105PERRIN R & JILL REMINGTON LOVE FAMILY TRUST 10/25/2019 10/25/2019 1533 E WESTMORELAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1364 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KAREN NIELSEN-ANSON ELSEN-ANSON 1457 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105LOREN R HULSE; JENNIFER W HULSE (JT) HULSE (JT)1463 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1479 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105BENJAMIN W. ANDERSON TRUST 04/24/2020 04/24/2020 1358 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 841051364 SOUTH 1500 EAST LLC 00 EAST LLC 466 S 400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111RICHARD D MENZIES; ANNELIE MENZIES (JT) ENZIES (JT)1469 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105DANIEL DUDLEY NIEL DUDLEY 1353 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ERIN SMITH; RICHARD J SMITH; COLBY H SMITH (JT) SMITH (JT)1361 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JOHN A III PETERSON II PETERSON 1369 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105CHARLES WILLIAM WATTS; ADAIR WATTS ADAIR WATTS 1352 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105MICHAEL RECTOR; JO ANNE MAASS (JT) MAASS (JT)1451 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JOHN R BOWMAN; MARY B M BOWMAN (JT) BOWMAN (JT)1445 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105RYAN JOSEPH CARPENTER; ERICA CAROLINE CARPENTER (JT) PENTER (JT)1441 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105ALEX E LOCKOVITCH LOCKOVITCH 1433 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105MARILYN ELIZABETH DOMENICK LIVING TRUST 04/25/2019 04/25/2019 1427 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 MARK JAMES CROWLEY; JUAN XIONG (JT) XIONG (JT)1421 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1413 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105KATHRYN HOFFMAN ABBY OFFMAN ABBY 1409 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JD LIV TRUST D LIV TRUST 1403 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105JEAN M GROSE EAN M GROSE 2223 S 1800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106JOEL H MURDOCH L H MURDOCH 1423 APPALOOSA AVE KAYSVILLE UT 84037Current Occupant 1382 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105Current Occupant 1358 S 1400 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/27/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/04/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Elmore, Noah E-mail noah.elmore@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/03/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/04/2025 Subject: Local Landmark Site Designation - 276 E 300 S & 310 S 300 E Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Recommendation to approve the designation. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Sampson-Altadena Condominiums Homeowner Association submitted a petition to designate the Sampson and Altadena Apartments as a local landmark site. The site consists of two buildings on one lot, Sampson Apartments and Altadena Apartments, located at 276 E 300 S and 310 S 300 E, respectively. Both the Historic Landmark Commission and Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation. PUBLIC PROCESS: Community Council Notice: A notice of application was sent to all recognized community organizations on May 23, 2025, per City Code Chapter 2.60 with a link to the online open house webpage. The recognized organizations were given 45 days to respond with any concerns or to request staff to meet with them and discuss the proposed zoning amendment. The 45-day public engagement period ended on July 7, 2025. Public Open House: An online open house was held from May 23, 2025 to July 23, 2025. No public comment was received. Historic Landmark Commission Meeting: The Historic Landmark Commission held a public hearing on July 10, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) Records a) HLC Agenda of July 10, 2025 (Click to Access) b) HLC Minutes of July 10, 2025 (Click to Access) c) HLC Staff Report of July 10, 2025 (Click to Access Report) Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 23, 2025. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council on the proposed amendment. Planning Commission (PC) Records d) PC Agenda of July 23, 2025 (Click to Access) e) PC Minutes of July 23, 2025 (Click to Access) f) PC Staff Report of July 23, 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 202__ (Ordinance Establishing the Sampson-Altadena Apartments Local Landmark Site) An ordinance amending the Zoning Map to establish the Sampson-Altadena Apartments Local Landmark Site pursuant to Petition No. PLNHLC2025-00357. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Historic Landmark Commission (“Historic Landmark Commission”) held a public hearing on July 10, 2025 on a petition submitted by the Sampson- Altadena Condominiums Homeowner Association (“Applicant”) to amend the city’s zoning map (Petition No. PLNHLC2025-00357) to apply the H Historic Preservation Overlay District to properties located 276 E 300 S and 310 S 300 E, as legally described on Exhibit A (the “Property”) and to establish the Property as a local landmark site pursuant to Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.51; and WHEREAS, at its July 10, 2025 meeting, the Historic Landmark Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) and Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 23, 2025 on said petition; and WHEREAS, at its July 23, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the City Council on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Establishing a Landmark Site. That the Property is hereby established as a landmark site and shall be known as the Sampson-Altadena Apartments Local Landmark Site. SECTION 2. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to apply the H Historic Preservation Overlay District to the Property. SECTION 3. Adopting the Historic Resource Survey. The landmark designation petition and associated report, attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, is hereby adopted as the Historic Resource Survey for the Sampson-Altadena Apartments Local Landmark Site. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 202__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 202__. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting Sampson-Altadena Apartments Local Landmark Sitev1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine Pasker, Senior City Attorney August 26, 2025 Exhibit “A” SAMPSON-ALTADENA APARTMENTS LOCAL LANDMARK SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION All Units and Common Areas located within the Sampson Altadena Condominiums, as the same are identified in the Record of Survey Map recorded in Salt Lake County, Utah as Entry No 6920523 in Book 98-4P of Plats, at Page 85 and as said record of Survey Map may have heretofore been amended or supplemented. Tax ID Nos. 16-06-184-001 through 018 Metes and bounds description: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 54, Plat “A”, Salt Lake City Survey, thence South 111 feet; thence West 74 ¼ feet; thence North 111 feet; thence East 74 ¼ feet to the place of beginning. Subject to a right of way over the following: Beginning 41 feet South of the Northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 54, Plat “A”, Salt Lake City Survey, and running thence West 74 ¼ feet; thence South 70 feet, thence East 74 ¼ feet; thence North 9 feet; thence West 64 ¼ feet; thence North 52 feet; thence East 64 ¼ feet; thence North 9 feet to the place of beginning. Exhibit “B” Historic Resource Survey [attached] NPS Form 10-900 Utah MS Word Format OMB No 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form RECEIVE&a^ DEC 1 8 2009 NAT. REaiSTgR OF HiSTORIC PLACES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A) Complete each item by marking "x' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a) Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Sampson Apartments other name/site number Sampson Flats, Sampson Altadena Condominiums 2. Location street name city or town state Utah 276 E. 300 South Salt Lake City • not for publication • vicinity code UT county Salt Lake code 035 zip code 84111 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this EI nomination n request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property S meets • does not meet thg National Register criteria I recommend that this property be considered significant n nationaUy-Q stat^wid^/H locally. ( Q Se^copt{??uation sj;ipet for additional comments.) 17- - ^ Signature of certifying official/Title Utah Division of State Historv, Office of Historic Preservation Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property • meets • does not meet the National Register criteria ( • See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby aertify that the property is: H entered in the National Register, n See continuation sheet. • determined eligible for the National Register • See continuation sheet. • determined not eligible for the National Register. • removed from the National Register. • other, (explain:) Date of Action Sampson Apartments Name of Property Salt Lake Citv. Salt Lake Countv. Utah City, County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property (check as many boxes as apply) Category of Property (check only one box) Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) ^ private • public-local • public-State • public-Federal 13 building(s) • district • site • structure • object Contributing 1 Noncontributing buildings sites structures objects Total Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) Historic Resources of Salt Lake City (Urban Apartments) Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling Current Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Neo-Classical Revival Other: Walk-Up Apartment Block Materials (Enter categories from instructions) foundation walls roof other STONE BRICK BUILT-UP Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition ofthe property on one or more continuation sheets.) jSee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 7 NPS Fomi 10 900-a Utah MS Wort Formal MB No 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Narrative Description The Sampson Apartments, a 3'/2-story Neoclassical brick building, was constructed in 1906. The building is one of two architecturally similar apartment blocks built at the comer of 300 South and 300 East in Salt Lake City. The address of the north-facing Sampson Apartments is 276 E. 300 South. The associated building, the Altadena Apartments, was also built in 1906. It faces east at 310 S. 300 East.' Both buildings are walk-up type apartment blocks with exterior balconies. The materials and construction methods are nearly identical. The raised foundation of both buildings is rock-faced sandstone, currently painted salmon. The red face brick is laid in a running bond with slightly raked mortar joints. There is a softer red brick, now painted dark gray, on the secondary elevations of the buildings. The roofs are flat and built-up. The buildings have several Neoclassical features such as pedimented entrances in the center of the symmetrical facades, Tuscan columns, dentillated cornices and accentuated keystones. All the contrasting elements are painted either white or gray. The flat roof is buih-up and the brick chimneystacks have been shortened. The Sampson Apartments is wider and shallower than the Altadena Apartments. The footprint measures 72 by 33 feet with the wide end facing 300 South. The fa9ade (north elevation) is symmetrical with a central entrance bay and three-story porches on either side. On the east elevation, facing 300 East, there is a three-story octagonal bay. The foundation is rock-faced sandstone laid in a random ashlar bond with raised mortar joints. The front entrance has original sandstone steps, also painted salmon. The front steps are flanked by rubbed- finished sandstone walls with flush mortar joints, currently painted gray. The smooth finish is also found on the belt course above the foundation (also painted gray). On the south (rear) elevation, the original recessed entrance and three-story enclosed porches were modified circa 1980, but many original elements remain. There are two sets of painted sandstone steps flanking the central rear opening. These steps originally accessed the three-story rear porches. However, the separate openings were blocked when the rear enclosure was modified. The current single entrance is accessed by a set of wood steps with a pipe rail (circa 1980). The foundation paint and exterior surface of the rear enclosure are the only major modifications to the exterior. The dominant architectural feature of the fa9ade (north elevation) of the Sampson block is the central entrance bay. The front entrance is sheltered by a portico supported on console brackets and engaged square columns that sit on the stepped stone rail walls. The pediment is covered is rough-textured stucco, painted orange. The simple gable roof features comice retums and dentils on the recessed raking comice. These wood elements have been painted contrasting colors of white, orange, and brown. The front door is a three-quarter glass paneled door with three-quarter sidelights. The door glass has been replaced (date unknown)." The projectmg wood comice sits above the entrance portico. The comice visually supports a two-story recess with a round- arch head. The arch is accentuated with contrasting blocks of stone, painted white. Three courses of rowlock brick are between the blocks and the stylized keystone. There is a diamond-pattem of rock-face brick below the ' The Altadena Apartments is being nominated separately. Both buildings are located on the same legal parcel at 276 E. Broadway Street (300 South). During the historic period, the street name "Broadway" was associated with 300 South in the commercial business district only. The use of the name "Broadway" outside of the business district is recent and "300 South" remains the more common name for the street. Prior to 1972, 300 South and 300 East were more commonly known as Third or 3'' South and Third or 3^"" East. ^ The original glass door was similar to that currently found on the Altadena Apartments. NPS Fomi 10 900-a Utah MS Word Fomiat MB No 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 2 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT keystone. Within the recessed area are four nine-over-one wood-sash windows (two on each floor) with rowlock and soldier brick heads that light the interior stairwell. The upper pair of windows has a continuous stone sill. The other upper floors windows are eight-over-one wood sash windows with brick heads accentuated by keystones slightly smaller than the main arch and stone sill. The three-story porches are also a prominent feature of the fa9ade. The main floor porch has square brick piers. The second and third-story porches feature trios of Tuscan columns at the front comers and single columns in the rear. All three stories feature a classical (plain) frieze, but the top comice under the flat-roof porch has a row of dentils that continues the dentil pattem of the main comice. The main comice is a projecting wood comice that wraps around the comers at the secondary elevations. Above the main comice is a brick parapet with tracery vents and a wood coping (now covered with metal). Originally, the porch roofs featured a wood balustrade with tracery similar to the vents. This feature was removed prior to a 1936 tax photograph. The six porches each feature a curved-slat wrought-iron balustrade and wood rail. All the wood elements are painted white to contrast with the red brick. Each porch has an exterior three-quarter glass door with transom, sidelights and screen.'^ Each unit includes one larger eight-over-one window with stone sill and keystone. The basement windows in the facade are flat-head one-over-one windows. Some basement window panes were replaced between the 1930s and 1947 when basement apartments were added to the building. The east elevation (facing 300 East) is similar in materials and omamentation to the fa9ade (north elevation). The primary difference is the octagonal bay that features rock-face brick at the angles. Each floor of the bay has an eight-over-one window flanked by narrower four-over-one windows. The single windows to the north are wider six-over-one windows. There are four basement windows cut into the foundation (three wood sash, one replacement). The stone belt course above the foundation becomes four courses of brick around the comer to the rear (south) elevation. The belt course remains painted gray. The brick is painted dark gray, but is peeling in places revealing the softer red brick of the secondary elevations. As the belt course meets the basement windows on the rear, the brick courses become segmental arched rowlock brick window heads. There are four basement windows on the south elevation. The west elevation also has two basement windows where the foundation is more visible due to the sloping site. The west elevation is relatively blank with two pairs of single-pane wood sash windows on each floor. The sills are stone (painted white) and the window heads are segmental rowlock brick arches. Each upper apartment on the south (rear) elevation has a single one-over-one double-hung window and a set of three windows, one single pane flanked by two double-hung windows. The sills and window heads are similar to the west elevation. The basement windows have a variety of glass including original two-pane wood sashes and non-historic smaller inset windows. There are a few metal vents in the foundation walls. The rear elevation entrances to the apartments have been modified at least twice since 1906. The 1911 Sanbom fire insurance map indicates the recessed rear entrance was enclosed with frame and featured a central open elevator."* The ' One of the upper transoms has been replaced with a smaller glass, but the visual impact on the integrity of the building is minimal. Other alterations on the porches include the installation of planter boxes and trellis, but all are reversible and have minimal impact on the historic integrity of the building. " The elevator was noted on the 1936 tax card, but was described as a dumb waiter on the later tax cards through the 1960s. It may have not been used for passengers in the second half of the twentieth century. NPS Fomi 10 900-a Uah MS Wond Fomiat MB No 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 3 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT sandstone steps flanking the current entrance suggest that two exits on the rear flanked the elevator before it was removed (circa 1970s). The original wood staircase is located deep in the recess. The brick and foundation in the recess have been painted red (date unknown). Around 1980, the rear enclosure was covered with vertical siding (now painted light gray). The current rear door is solid wood with a wrought-iron security screen. Details in the recess, such as double-hung exterior windows and rock-face brick at the angles suggest that the original rear enclosure was more open to view than the current enclosure (possibly screened). Original bead board ceilings are still visible within the individual porch enclosures. The current enclosure has aluminum slider windows. There is about ten feet of space between the south elevation of the Sampson and the north elevation of the Altadena Apartments. The two buildings share a wrought-iron fire escape in the space between. On the interior, the Sampson Apartments has approximately 2,214 square feet on each floor. The front stairwell is open and features a square-post balustrade with newel posts. The mailboxes are mounted on the main level foyer. The carpet and tile are later replacements. There are two units per landing with approximately 1,085 square feet of space each. The four basement units vary in size. There is also a common laundry room and boiler room in the basement. Although some of the interiors have been altered by the owners after the conversion to condominiums, the configuration of Unit 6 is representative. This unit features a central hall extending west from the front door. The kitchen and rear porch are to the south, the bathroom is to the north. There is a room with an alcove and two built-in cupboards (now a dining room) next to the kitchen. There is a bedroom in the southwest comer. On the north side, there is a room with a built-in bookcase (now a study) that shares a pocket door with the living room. The living room is in the northwest comer. It features the large window and the exterior door to the porch. Many of the elements of the original apartment have been retained such as the sink basin and drain board, claw foot tub, hardwood floors, wood casings, built-ins, and radiators.^ The basement units were not original and have later features (some historic). The Sampson and Altadena Apartments share common site features. There is only a few feet of setback on the street sides (along 300 South and 300 East). There is a concrete sidewalk between parking strip with trees and lawn and the lawn next to the buildings. Access to the rear of the buildings from 300 East is blocked by chain link gates between the two buildings, and between the Altadena and the neighboring building to the south. The remainder of the parcel is paved with asphalt for parking on the west side. This parking area is shared by the adjacent parcel. There is a small tree behind the Altadena. The neighborhood of the Sampson and Altadena is a mixed-use neighborhood only a few blocks east of Salt Lake City's commercial business district. Notable buildings in the area include the YWCA complex and First Church of Christ, Scientist just to the east, and the newer Broadway Condominiums to the west.^ ' The amount of original material varies by unit. Some units retain the original kitchen cabinetry. Not all units were inspected for this nomination. The First Church of Christian Science is historically associated with the Sampson and Altadena Apartments (see Section 8). It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1977. NPS Fomi 10 900-a Ulah MS Word Fomiat MB No 1024-0018 (Expifes 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 4 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT The Sampson Apartments, built in 1906. have remarkable historic integrity. It meets the registration requirements of the property type. Urban Apartment Builders, as described in the Multiple Property Listing, Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion into the Early Twentieth Century 1890s to 1930s. The Sampson makes a significant contribution to the historic and architectural resources of Salt Lake City. Sampson Apartments Name of Property 8. Description Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing.) ^ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. O B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. S C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. • D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" In all the boxes that apply.) Property is: n A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. O B removed from its original location. • C a birthplace or grave. • Da cemetery. • E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. • Fa commemorative property. • G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance ofthe property on one or more continuation sheets.) Salt Lake Citv. Salt Lake County. Utah City, County and State Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Period of Significance 1906-1945 Significant Dates 1906 Significant Persons (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/A Architect/Builder Builder: August Rudine ESee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 8 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used In preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets. Previous documentation on file (NPS): • preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested • previously listed in the National Register • previously determined eligible by the National Register • designated a National Historic Landmark • recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # • recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Primary location of additional data: S State Historic Preservation Office • Other State agency • Federal agency • Local government • University • Other Name of repository: SSee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 9 r OMB No. 1024-0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of IHistoric Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Narrative Statement of Significance The Sampson Apartments, built in 1906, is locally significant under Criterion A and C for its associations with the urbanization of Salt Lake City in the early twentieth century. Between 1900 and 1935, Sah Lake City experienced rapid growth and the urban apartment block emerged as a new housing option in the neighborhoods adjacent to the city's commercial center. The availability of urban apartments was particularly important during this period of growth as a response to the suburbanization of the city's outlying neighborhoods beginning in the 1890s. Urban apartments were an important housing option for Salt Lake City's immigrant population and an influx of young people moving from Utah rural towns to the capitol city in search of employment. The first owners were Octavius and Eunice Sampson, who were part-time residents as well as the managers of the two buildings for nearly four decades. The period of significance is 1906 to 1945—from the date of construction to the year the Sampson family sold the property. The Neoclassical three-story brick Sampson Apartments and its associated building, the Altadena Apartments, were early examples of this period of apartment construction, during which time the typical apartment block was a three-story walk-up with two units on each floor flanking a central staircase. The Sampson and Altadena apartment blocks standout as high-end architectural representatives of the property type. The Neoclassical architectural omamentation of the building has been exceptionally well-preserved, especially when compared to similar extant apartment blocks from the period. Architecturally, the Sampson Apartments stands out for the relatively upscale amenities found in the units. The building had an exterior elevator, only found on a few early apartment blocks. On the interior, each unit was larger than typical for the period with two bedrooms, a large kitchen, and a bathroom. The Sampson Apartments is architecturally significant and represents the financial resources of the Sampson family, as well as the craftsmanship of the builder, August Rudine. The building is significant under the Multiple Property Documentation for the Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion in the Early Twentieth Century. 1890s-1930s. also known as the Salt Lake City Urban Apartments MPS. The Sampson Apartments has excellent historic integrity and contributes to the historic resources of one of Salt Lake City's oldest neighborhoods. History of the Sampson and adjoining Altadena Apartments At the tum of the nineteenth century, there were three adobe houses at the northeast comer of Block 54. In February 1904, Adelaide M. Williams sold the comer property to Anna Rudine. One month later, Anna Rudine also acquired the adjacent property from Victoria S. Hillier. Anna "Annie" Nelson Rudine (1865-1943) was bom in Norway and came to the United States in 1883. In 1892, she married August Rudine in Califomia. August Rudine (1862-?) was a Swedish immigrant who came to the United States in 1882. August Rudine was listed as a bricklayer in an 1893-1894 city directory for Los Angeles. The couple had one son bom in Califomia before moving to Salt Lake City in 1895. They had three more sons bom in Utah. August Rudine continued to be listed as a bricklayer in the Salt Lake City directories in the late 1890s. By 1900, August Rudine had OMB No 1024-OOH, NPS Fonm United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 2 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT established himself as a general contractor in the Salt Lake area. In the 1920s, the family moved back to Califomia. In June 1905, Rudine had an agreement to sell the property to R. E. McConaughy, but the transaction never occurred. Robert E. McConaughy (1859-1924) was bom in Illinois and moved from Nebraska to Utah in 1880s. He established one of the largest real estate and development companies in Salt Lake City in the first quarter of the twentieth century. It is not known whether he was involved in the construction of the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. The Rudines sold the south nine rods to Emma Whiting (1861-1919) in 1904. Emma Whiting sold to O. T. Sampson in June 1905. On April 26, 1906, August and Anna Rudine sold the comer property to O. T. Sampson. On May 31, 1906, O. T. Sampson obtained two Salt Lake City building permhs, each for a three-story terrace apartment block of 68 rooms to be built for an estimated cost of $25,000 at the comer of 300 East and 300 South. No architect or builder was listed on the building permit. Considering the interests of August Rudine in the property, it is likely he was the builder for the project.^ Octavius T. Sampson (1867-1945) was bom in Comwall, England. He came to the United States in 1895. Octavius Sampson married Eunice Elgan in Soda Springs, Idaho, in 1899. Eunice Elgan Sampson (1881-1965) was bom in Saint Clark, Missouri. The couple had two sons, James L. and Octavius T. Jr.. bom in Idaho before they moved to Salt Lake City in 1906. Their oldest son James Louis Sampson died of epilepsy at the age of twenty. Their daughter, Altadena, was bom in Salt Lake City in 1908. The Altadena Apartments were originally known as Vivian Flats. The name was changed only a few years after Altadena's birth. Octavius and Eunice Sampson were members of the First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Salt Lake City. Their decision to purchase the Rudine property was likely to do its proximity to the large stone meetinghouse at 352 E. 300 South. The congregation had completed building the edifice just a few years previously in 1898. According to oral tradition passed along by older neighbors, the Sampsons were very prominent in the church and built the apartment blocks so that members of the congregation could live there.^ The 1906 city directory lists Octavius Sampson living at the address 354 E. 300 South, which is either the church building or the brick house next to it."^ Newspaper subscribers listed in the Salt Lake Herald suggest that the apartments were occupied as early as December 1906. By 1907, the Sampsons are living at 310 S. 300 East. The name Sampson Flats is used for both buildings in some sources, but Vivian (later Altadena) had a separate name by 1907. In ^ R. E. McConaughy was listed as a builder for other projects he developed. Another possible builder is W. C. A. Vissing (1874- 1936), a Danish immigrant, who was one of the earliest apartment builders in the city. Andy Vissing built the Cluff Apartments located at 1270-1280 E. 200 South (NRHP 10/20/1989). which has similar architectural detail to the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. ' The First Church of Christ, Scientist, was listed on the NRHP in 1976, only the second church of that denomination to be listed at the time. The Richardsonian-Romanesque building was designed by the prominent Salt Lake architect Walter E. Ware. ' Correspondence of Allison D. Johnson to the First Church of Christ, Scientist, Cominunications Office located in the files of Emily Evans. There are no membership records available for the period. A high percentage of early tenants were from the mid-west, but the transient nature of the occupants makes them difficult to trace. The address ofthe house is 360 E. 300 South. The 1907-1908 Salt Lake City Blue Book lists Mr. and Mrs. Octavius C. [sic] Sampson living at 354 S. 300 East, which is a duplex. Either way, they were living in the area while the apartments were being constructed. OMBNo 1024-0018, NPS Fom United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 3 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT the winter of 1907, Octavius and Eunice Sampson were living in the Sampson Flats when a burglar entered their apartment. The thief was chased off by the upstairs neighbor, S. A. Giffin, who went to get his revolver." The Sampsons were a relatively prosperous family. Various sources list Octavius Sampson's occupation as an apartment manger, a sheepman, and a farmer. By the time ofthe 1910 census, the family was living on a farm in south Salt Lake, but Octavius still gave his occupation as landlord. He is listed as a farmer at 2943 S. 300 East on the 1920 and 1930 census enumerations. In 1930, Octavius T. Jr. was an auto mechanic. By the mid-1930s, Octavius and Eunice Sampson moved back into town into the Altadena Apartments as resident-managers. Octavius T. Sampson died on March 9, 1945. His occupation was listed on his death certificate was apartment building landlord. Eunice E. Sampson, and her children Octavius T. Sampson Jr. and Altadena Sampson Cole, sold the property in October 1945 to the Page Investment Company. She moved to a house on Stratford Avenue where she lived until her death in July 1965. The Sampsons are interred in Mount Olivet Cemetery. Items in the local newspapers suggest that the early tenants of the Sampson and Vivian/Altadena buildings were middle to upper-middle class. The name of the buildings appears in the society columns for parties and other social events. One resident of the Vivian Flats, J. J. Ott, placed an advertisement for a lost diamond pin, which he lost somewhere between the Christian Science Church and North Temple.'^ Anonymous Vivian Flats residents placed an advertisement for a young girl to do housework.'^ Among the earliest tenants were Steven and Rose Stewart Alley, of whom two local newspapers reported they would be living in the Sampson Flats after their honeymoon.'^ The Alleys did not stay to be listed on the 1910 census enumeration, but all of the occupants of the Sampson Apartments were couples. With the exception of one young couple from Utah, the occupants in 1910 were mostly bom in the Midwest. Three of the couples were childless and in their twenties or thirties. Two couples had one child. Both of these households had a live-in servant. One couple in their forties had a son and a daughter, both bom in Utah. The only immigrant in the building was one man bom in Russia. Besides the domestics, the residents were employed as a grocery merchant, a lawyer, a bookkeeper for an implement company, a roofing salesman, and two railroad agents. Six households in the Sampson Apartments could be located on the 1920 census enumeration. At the time, there were two young couples. One couple had one child and a lodger. There was one older couple with a grown child. One head of household was a widower living with his daughter and son-in-law. One divorcee was living with his mother and another was single. The residents were bom in Utah, Colorado, Idaho, Wyoming, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Canada, Switzerland and Greece. The mix of residents living in the Sampson Apartments had changed by the time of the 1930 census enumeration. The average age was much older with most residents " 5a// Lake Herald, December 1, 1907. Sah Lake Herald, January 5. 1907. " Sah Lake Herald November 16, 1908. Ogden Standard Examiner, July 9, 1908. Salt Lake Herald, July 9, 1908. OMB No 1024-0018. NPS Forni United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 4 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT between their mid-forties and early seventies. Part of the shift may have come from the proliferation of smaller (and less expensive) apartment units available for young couples and singles built in Salt Lake City just prior to the depression years. There were not children living in the Sampson in 1930. The only younger residents were the grown offspring of two older couples. The occupations listed in the census enumeration include a salesman, a miner, a bottler for the local brewery, a druggist, a fumiture store bookkeeper, a mattress maker, and the proprietor of a grocery store. One basement apartment was added in the 1930s when the Sampsons moved back. The other units were added during a 1947 remodeling that occurred after the Sampson family sold the property to the Page Investment Company in October 1945." In April 1947, Meredith and Maurine S. Page deeded their interest in the property to Gwynne and Duke Page. The Page Investment Company owned and managed the property until 1972, when it was sold to Donald B. Hadley et al. This period coincided with a general decline in the urban apartment market in downtown Salt Lake City and was likely when the rear enclosure was made more secure. Subsequent owners of the property include GT Real Estate, and later Capitol Redevelopment. The buildings were converted to condominiums in 1998 after the declaration of the Sampson Altadena Condominiums. The conversion and ongoing rehabilitation of the two buildings is part of a general renaissance in urban living in Salt Lake City, which began in the 1990s. The units currently have multiple owners with the common areas owned by the Sampson Altadena Homeowners Association. Salt Lake City Development and the Architecture of the Sampson and Altadena Apartments On July 24, 1847, a small contingent of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS or Mormon Church) entered the Salt Lake Valley under the direction of Brigham Young. On August 2. 1847, a little more than a week later, the first city survey, known as Plat A, consisting of 135 blocks, was completed. The land was divided into ten-acre blocks, each containing eight lots of one and one-quarter acres. Streets were 132 wide feet. One house could be constructed on each lot with a standard setback of twenty feet from the front of the property. The first Sanbom map to cover Plat A's Block 54 was produced in 1898 and show three adobe dwellings (two single-family and one duplex) at the corner of 300 South and 300 East. Between the late 1840s and 1900, the population of Sah Lake City had grown from 6,000 to 54,000. By the time of the 1910 census the population had grown to 92,777. This transformation from agrarian village to a bustling urban metropolis was spurred by the railroads, which brought an increase in every type of manufacturing and commerce, as well as an enormous influx of immigrant laborers and their families. The original lots of each ten-acre block had been divided and subdivided until most of the Plat A blocks had inner- block streets, courts and places. During this period there was a great range of architecture in the early neighborhoods. Pioneer settlement adobe and frame hall-parlors were intermingled with brick and frame " The deed was transferred fi-om the Sampsons to Riverton Motor Company on October 13, 1945, and then on the same day to the Page Investment Company. r OMB No 1024-0018. NPS Fom United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 5 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Victorian cottages. Multiple-family dwellings first appeared as double houses, which became popular in the 1890s. By the tum of the century the city core had developed into an urban commercial district with high-rise office buildings and multiple streetcar lines. During the first half of the twentieth century, the rapid increase in the city's population created a demand for housing that was met by two diametrically opposed types of housing: central city apartments and subdivision homes.The cit>' instigated massive urban improvement projects such as water mains, sewage facilities, electrical lines and telephone service, both in the central city and in the emerging suburbs. Rising land values and urban congestion made the apartment house a feasible investment for developers. This was noted in a Salt Lake Tribune that appeared in 1902, just as the first major apartments were being constmcted: "It is generally recognized by farseeing investors that the period of cottages in Salt Lake has reached its highest point and the period of flat buildings, marking another stage in the evolution from town to city, has just begun."'^ Over 180 apartment buildings, all built by private investors, were constructed in SaU Lake City during the first three decades of the twentieth century. The emergence of apartment building also presented a practical housing altemative for those residents who could not (or would not) take advantage the increasing attractive and convenient suburbs. Though, the vast majority consisted of apartments for the middle class, a few early urban apartments were more luxury units, including the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. The later period of apartment constmction in Salt Lake City, in the 1920s and 1930s, were primarily large-scale double-loaded corridor apartments that were built for the middle and higher working classes. The gradual transformation of some of these buildings into housing for the inner-city poor did not take place until the last quarter of the twentieth century. In fact, the economic status of the early apartment dwellers was virtually the same as that of suburban homeowners of the same period, middle and upper-middle class. The major difference between the two groups was transitory nature of apartment dwellers. Tenants were often in transitional phases of their lives. Common occupants include newly married or childless couples, widows and widowers, retirees, and working single adults. The Sampson family and their fellow tenants represent a somewhat higher socio-economic strata than the general demographic trends for the period, although they were just as transitory. The Sampson and adjoining Altadena, built in 1906, are excellent examples of an early apartment complex built for the architectural tastes and comforts of the upper-middle class. The Neoclassical architectural detail in the brick and stone masonry is exceptional. UTiile a few amenities in the two buildings, such as built-in cupboards and exterior porches were typical for the period, several features were atypically luxurious. A cursory study of the 1911 Sanbom maps reveals only a handful of contemporaneous multi-story apartment blocks with elevators. Although the 1906 open elevator at the rear of apartments would be considered cmde by today's standards, it would have been considered a luxury in its day. The interior of the original units are particularly striking for Roger Roper, Sah Lake City Urban Apartments, MPS, 1989. Sah Lake Tribune, July 27, 1902: 32. Quoted in MPS. OMB No 1024-0018 NPS Foim United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 6 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT their numerous windows. The five-room units are considerably larger than the average tum-of-the-century apartment in Salt Lake City, and the over-sized (by today's standards) kitchen and bathroom in each unit were particularly commodious. Each unit included one or two built-in closets, a rare feature in 1906. One indication of the upscale condition of the apartments can be found in a rare complimentary comment written by an anonymous tax assessor on the December 1936 tax cards for both the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. On ' * 18 both cards, the assessor wrote "These apts. have been kept in the best of condition.'" The Sampson and Altadena Apartments are two of twenty-five extant examples of walk-up apartments built between 1903 and 1915. Although a few walk-ups were buih after 1915, they lack exterior porches and are stylistically distinct from the earlier examples. Eighteen of these examples have been classified as Neoclassical or Colonial Revival in style. The rest were influenced by the Prairie School. The Sampson and Altadena are most similar in style to several apartment blocks buih by W.C.A. Vissing (1874-1936). The closest example is the Cluff Apartments (later Hillview, listed on the NRHP 10/20/1989). The Cluff has similar porches, but is a much wider building and lacks the distinctive brickwork found on the Sampson and Altadena buildings. Twin apartment blocks are rare in Salt Lake City. Vissing also built the dual Princeton and Boulevard Apartments located on the comer of 900 East and 100 South. The Princeton and Boulevard Apartments feature colossal Ionic columns on the exterior porches (NRHP listed in the Salt Lake Eastside Historic District, Bryant Neighborhood, 2001). Vissing also built several blocks for the Covey Investment Company that are Neoclassical in style. The Covey blocks and those like them are larger in scale, closer to downtown and mostly U-courts. Most did not include the amenities found in the Altadena and Sampson Apartments. There are numerous smaller apartment blocks located within the Salt Lake City .Avenues Historic District. The Avenues neighborhood has a fairly steep slope and most of the apartment blocks were more modest in size and had smaller units than the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. The Altadena and Sampson are particularly well- preserved and most of the typical modifications found on contemporaneous buildings (porch enclosures and removals, window and door replacements, etc.) have been avoided. Constmcted in 1906, the Sampson Apartments, and its companion, the Altadena Apartments, are two of the many urban apartments built in Salt Lake City during the first three decades of the twentieth century. This was an unprecedented era of expansion and urbanization in the city. The period of significance for the Sampson and Altadena Apartments is between 1906 and 1945. which represents this important era. The upscale amenities designed for the original construction of the Altadena and Sampson Apartments, just those amenities that were desirable qualities when the buildings were converted to condominiums in 1989. Urban apartments are significant under Criterion C as an important residential building type that emerged as Salt Lake City was transformed into an urban center during the early twentieth century. Both buildings meet the registration requirements and are significant under the Multiple Property Documentation for the Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion in the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s-1930s, also known as the Salt Lake City Urban Apartments MPS. Salt Lake County tax assessor cards, December 18, 1936. It was much more common for the assessor to note deficits such as crumbling brick or cheap materials. OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 9 Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT BibUography Carter, Thomas and Peter Goss. Utah's Historic Architecture, 1847-1940, A Guide. Salt Lake City, Utah: University ofUtah Press, 1988. Evans, Emily. Interviews conducted by author May 2009 to July 2009. . Research file on the Sampson-Altadena Apartments. Fohlin, E. V. Sah Lake City Past and Present: A Narrative of Its History and Romance, Its People and Cultures, Its Industry and Commerce. Its Attractions and Grandeurs, Its Bright and Promising Future With Chapters of Utah's General Resources And Progressiveness. Salt Lake City, Utah: E. V. Fohlin, 1908. Polk Directories, Sah Lake City, 1900-1993. Published by R.L. Polk & Co. Available at the Utah State Historical Society and the Marriott Library, University of Utah. Roper, Roger V. Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion into the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s-1930s, [Salt Lake City Urban Apartments] Multiple Property Documentation Form. Prepared 1989. Available at the Utah State Historic Preservation Office. [Salt Lake County Tax Cards]. Available at the Salt Lake County Archives. [Salt Lake County Title Abstracts]. Available at the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. Salt Lake Herald. Salt Lake Tribune. [Sampson Apartments, 276 E. 300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah]. Files of the Utah State Historic Preservation Office. Sanbom Fire Insurance Maps for Salt Lake City, 1898, 1911, and 1950. Available at the Utah State Historical Society and the University of Utah Marriott Library United States Federal Census Enumerations. Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, 1900 to 1930. Utah Heritage Foundation. "Through the Eyes of Many Faiths.'" Compiled and edited by the members of the Church Tour Committee of the Utah Heritage Foundation, 1983 & 1990. OMB No 1024-0018. NPS Forni United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 9 Page 2 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT [Utah State Historical Society Burials Database]. Available online at Historical Society's website (www.history.utah.gov). Sampson Apartments Name of Property 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 0 19 acre(s) Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah City, County and State UTM References (Place additional boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) A 1/2 4/2/5/5/4/0 4/5/1/2/5/6/0 B / / / / / / I I I I I I Zone Easting C J_ 1 1 / 11 Zone Easting Northing I I I I I I Northing Zone Easting D / I I I I I Zone Easting Northing I I I I I I Northing Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries ofthe property.) BEG NE COR LOT 8. BLK 54, PLAT A, SLC SUR; S 111 FT; W 74.25 FT; N 111 FT; E 74.25 FT TO BEG. LESS UNITS 0.19 AC (BEING THE COMMON AREA OF SAMPSON ALTADENA CONDOMINIUM). Property Tax No. 16-06-184-001 to 16-06-184-018 Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) The boundaries are those which were historically associated with the property and which continue to be associated with the property. •See continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 10 11. Form Prepared By name/title Korral Broschinsky, Preservation Documentation Resource organization prepared for the Sampson Altadena Homeowners' Association street & number PO Box 58766 city or town Salt Lake City date October 1, 2009 telephone 801-913-5645 state UT zip code 84158 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs: Representative black and white photographs ofthe property. Additional items: (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner name/title Multiple Owners / Contact person: Emily Evans, Owner Representative (see Contiuation Sheet) street & number 276 E. 300 South (Broadway Street), #S6 telephone 801-554-0730 city or town Salt Lake City state UT zip code 84111 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. OMB No 1024-0018. NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. Owner Contact Information Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Owners of the Sampson Apartments Unit# Unit Owner Alternate Address for Non-Occupants SOI Emily Moench n/a S02 Patrick Colclough n/a 1299 W. 4800 South SOS William Vince Park Murray. UT 84123 5131 S. Dawson Street, S04 Hooman Tajbakhsh Seattle, WA 98118 (part-time occupant) 805 Patrick Colclough n/a S06 Emily Evans n/a 451 Bishop Federal Lane, Apt. 4115 S07 John Bucher Salt Lake City, UT84115 555 E 475 South S08 Sarah Brown CenterviUe, UT 84014 S09 John Lopez n/a SIC Heather Moench n/a OMB No 1024-0016 NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. PHOTOS Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Common Label Information: 1. Sampson Apartments 2. 276 E. 300 South, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 3. Photographer: Korral Broschinsky 4. Date: November 2009 5. Digital images on file at Utah SHPO. Photo No. 1: 6. North elevation ofbuilding. Camera facing south. Photo No. 2: 6. North and east elevations of building. Camera facing southwest. Photo No. 3: 6. West and south elevations of building. Camera facing northeast. Photo No, 4: 6. Interior, Unit 6, office with pocket doors. Camera facing northwest. Photo No. 5: 6. North and east elevations of building. Camera facing southwest. Photo No. 6: 6. East elevations of Sampson (right) and Altadena (left). Camera facing west. Photo No. 7: 6. West elevations of Sampson (left) and Altadena (right). Camera facing east. Photo No. 8: 6. West elevation ofbuilding. Camera facing southeast. Photo No. 9: 6. East elevation of building. Camera facing northwest. Photo No. 10: 6. North elevation ofbuilding, entrance detail. Camera facing northwest. OMB No 1024-0018. NPS Forni United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. PHOTOS Page 2 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT PhotoNo. 11: 6. Interior, stair and newel post detail. Camera facing southeast. Photo No. 12: 6. Interior, view into Unit 6 from stair landing. Camera facing west. Photo No. 13: 6. Interior, Unit 6, living room. Camera facing southeast. Photo No. 14: 6. Interior, Unit 6, dining room with alcove and built-ins. Camera facing south. OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Forni United States Department ofthe Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. HISTORIC PHOTOS Page 1 Sampson Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Sampson & Altadena Apartments, photographed August 7, 1907 27 6 E . 3 0 0 S o u t h Sa l t L a k e C i t y , S a l t L a k e C o u n t y . U t a h Sa m p s o n A p a r t m e n t s CO m o O' o X CD H O O •u X O H o TJ •x ; rc C/3 3 C/) o > ID CD 3 03 CO — CD O CO 0) O o c o z O 0 ) !2 : o c f i ) &} ~ =3 : 7 J o ® (A o -\ O &) o 0 O C D 3 Q . 2i . 0 ) -Q a ) * s r 3r < n <D C D 5. 0 ) <^ a . " 3 ff i 3 o' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE : NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES EVALUATION/RETURN SHEET REQUESTED ACTION: NOMINATION PROPERTY Sampson Apartments NAME: MULTIPLE Salt Lake City MPS NAME: STATE Sc COUNTY: UTAH, Salt Lake DATE RECEIVED: 12/18/09 DATE OF PENDING LIST: 1/13/10 DATE OF 16TH DAY: 1/28/10 . DATE OF 45TH DAY: 2/01/10 DATE OF WEEKLY LIST: REFERENCE NUMBER: 09001292 REASONS FOR REVIEW: - ' - APPEAL: N DATA PROBLEM: N LANDSCAPE: N LESS THAN 50 YEARS: N OTHER: N PDIL: N PERIOD: N PROGRAM UNAPPROVED: N REQUEST: N SAMPLE: N SLR DRAFT: N NATIONAL: N COMMENT WAIVER: N _ACCEPT RETURN REJECT | * 7S1' DATE ABSTRACT/SUMMARY COMMENTS; £ateredtn RECOM./CRITERIA REVIEWER DISCIPLINE_ TELEPHONE DATE DOCUMENTATION see attached comments Y/N see attached SLR Y/N If a nomination is returned to the nominating authority, the nomination is no longer under consideration by the NPS. ^ ^ ^ ^^ "-!..v...y state of Utah G.ARY R. HERBERT Governor GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor Department of Community and Culture PALMER DePAULIS Executive Director State History PHILIP F. NOTARIANNI Division Director RECEIVED 2280 DEC 1 8 2009 NAT. REGISTER OK HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TO: Dr. Janet Matthews, Keeper, National Register of Historic Places FROM: Cory Jensen, National Register Coordinator Utah State Historic Preser\'ation Office SUBJECT: National Register Nomination The following materials are submitted on this day nfX^Qg^^ for the nomination of the Sampson Apartments ^ ,2009, to the National Register of Historic Places: 1 Original National Register of Historic Places nomination form Multiple Propert}^ Nomination form 14 Photograph(s) (archival) _2 Photograph (s) (supplemental) J Gold Archival CD-R w/Image Files & Nomination PDF J Original USGS Map Sketch map(s)/figure(s) Pieces of Correspondence Other COMMENTS: Please review iSIATE For questions please contact Cory Jensen at 801/533-3559, or coryjensen@utah.gov ISIOKf UTAH STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ANTIQUITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESEARCH CENTER S. COLLECTIONS 300 S. RIO GRANDE STREET. SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-1182 TELEPHONE 801 533-3500 - FACSIMILE 801 533-3503 HISTORY.UTAH.COV state ofUtah GARYR. HERBERT Governor GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor Department of Community and Culture PALMER DePAULIS E.xecutive Director State History PHILIP F. NOTARIANNI Division Director December 10, 2009 DR. JANET MATTHEWS KEEPER NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1201 EYE STREET, NW, 8"^ FLOOR (MS 2280) WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 Dear Dr. Matthews: Enclosed please find the registration form and documentation for the following National Register nominations that have been approved by the State Historic Preservation Review Board and the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places: Chipman, Henry & Elizabeth Parker, House Dunn-Binnall House & Farmstead Altadena Apartments Sampson Apartments American Fork, Utah Co. American Fork, Utah Co. Salt Lake City, Salt Lake Co. Sah Lake City, Salt Lake Co. Thank you for your assistance with this nomination. Please contact me at 801/533-3559, or at coryjensen@utah.gov if you have any questions. J. Cory J ;nsen Architect aral Historian National Register Coordinator Office of Historic Preservation P Enclosures SIATE HISTOFX UTAH STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ANTIQUITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESEARCH CENTER «. COLLECTIONS 300 S. RIO GRANDE STREET SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101-1182 • TELEPHONE 801 533-3500 FACSIMILE 801 533-3503 HISTORY.UTAH.COV NPS Foim 10-900 Utah MS Word Format OMB No 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form y^ RECEIVED 2286 CTlires 5/31/2012) DEC 1 8 2009 NAT. R6GI8TER 0?^ HISTORIC PLACES NATIONiAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts See instructions in How to Complete tfie National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typew/riter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Altadena Apartments other name/site number Altadena Flats, Sampson Altadena Condominiums 2. Location street name city or town state Utah 310 S. 300 East Salt Lake City D not for publication • vicinity code UT county Salt Lake code 035 zip code 84111 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act. as amended. I hereby certify that this S nomination n request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^ meets • does not meet the National Register criteria I reconjmend that this property be considered significant • nationally; • st^tewi;;^^ locally. ( • Se^-pqptjhuation jKeet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Utah Division of State Historv, Office of Historic Preservation Date state or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property • meets • does not meet the National Register criteria. ( • See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. Natipnal Park Service Certification I hereby c^ify that the property is: 57entered in the National Register. • See continuation sheet. • detennined eligible for the National Register • See continuation sheet. • determined not eligible for the National Register. • removed from the National Register. • other, (explain;) Date of Action i-nic) Altadena Apartments Name of Property 5. Classification Ownership of Property (check as many boxes as apply) ^ private • public-local • public-State • public-Federal Category of Property (check only one box) M buiiding(s) • district • site • structure Q object Salt Lake Citv. Salt Lake Countv. Utah City, County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing 1 Noncontributing buildings sites structures objects Total Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) Historic Resources of Salt Lake City (Urban Apartments) Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: Multiple Dvt/elling Current Function (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Neo-Classical Revival Other: Walk-Up Apartment Block Materials (Enter categories from instructions) foundation walls roof other STONE BRICK BUILT-UP Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition ofthe property on one or more continuation sheets.] ^ S ee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 7 NPS Form 10 900-a Utah MS VWord Format MB r4o 1024-0018 . ^ (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Narrative Description The Altadena Apartments, a 3'/2-story Neoclassical brick building, was constructed in 1906. The building is one of two architecturally similar apartment blocks built at the comer of 300 South and 300 East in Salt Lake City. The address of the east-facing Altadena Apartments is 310 S. 300 East. The associated building, the Sampson Apartments, was also built in 1906. It faces north at 276 E. 300 South.' Both buildings are walk-up type apartment blocks with exterior balconies. The materials and construction methods are nearly identical. The raised foundation of both buildings is rock- faced sandstone, currently painted salmon. The red face brick is laid in a running bond with slightly raked mortar joints. There is a softer red brick, now painted dark gray, on the secondary elevations of the buildings. The roofs are flat and built-up. The buildings have several Neoclassical features such as pedimented entrances in the center of the symmetrical fa9ades, Tuscan columns, dentillated cornices and accentuated keystones. All the contrasting elements are painted either white or gray. The flat roof is built-up and there is a single full-height corbelled chimneystack. The Altadena Apartments is narrower and slightly deeper than the adjoining Sampson Apartments. The footprint measures 52 by 44 feet with the wider end facing 300 East. The fa9ade (east elevation) is symmetrical with a central entrance bay and three-story porches on either side. The foundation is rock-faced sandstone laid in a random ashlar bond with raised mortar joints. The front entrance has original sandstone steps, also painted salmon. The front steps are flanked by rubbed-finished sandstone walls with flush mortar joints, currently painted gray. The smooth finish is also found on the belt course above the foundation (also painted gray). On the west (rear) elevation, the original recessed entrance and three-story enclosed porches were modified circa 1980, but many original elements remain. There are two sets of painted sandstone steps on the west side of the rear opening (one is partially demolished). These steps originally accessed the three-story rear porches. However, the separate openings were blocked when the rear enclosure was modified. The current single entrance is accessed by a set of wood steps with a pipe rail (circa 1980). The foundation paint and exterior surface of the rear enclosure are the only major modifications to the exterior. The dominant architectural feature of the facade (east elevation) of the Altadena block is the central entrance bay. The front entrance is sheltered by a portico supported on console brackets and engaged square columns that sit on the stepped stone rail walls. The pediment is covered is rough-textured stucco, painted orange. The simple gable roof features cornice returns and dentils on the recessed raking cornice. These wood elements have been painted contrasting colors of white, orange, and brown. The front door is the original beveled glass with central diamond panes set in a geometric- patterned wood sash. The front door features a metal kick plate and three-quarter glass sidelights. The projecting wood cornice sits above the entrance portico. The cornice visually supports a two-story recessed area with a round-arch head. The arch is accentuated with contrasting blocks of stone, painted white. Three courses of rowlock brick are between the blocks and the stylized keystone. There is a diamond-pattern of rock-face brick below the keystone. Within the recess are four nine-over-one wood-sash windows (two on each floor) with rowlock and soldier brick heads. The windows light the interior stairwell. The upper pair of windows has a continuous stone sill. The windows on the upper floors are eight- over-one wood sash windows with brick heads accentuated by keystones slightly smaller than the main arch and stone sill. The Sampson Apartments is being nominated separately. Both buildings are located on the same legal parcel at 276 E. Broadway Street (300 South). During the historic period, the street name "Broadway" was associated with 300 South in the commercial business district only. The use of the name "Broadway" outside of the business district is recent and "300 South" remains the more common name for the street. The Altadena Apartments use the address 310 S. 300 East. Prior to 1972, 300 South and 300 East were more commonly known as Third or 3"^ South and Third or 3"* East. NPS Form 10 900.a Utah MS WbiTl Format MB No. 1024-OOH (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 2 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT The three-story porches are also a prominent feature of the facade. The main floor porch has square brick piers. The second and third-story porches feature trios of Tuscan columns at the front corners and single columns in the rear. All three stories feature a classical (plain) frieze, but the top cornice under the flat-roof porch has a row of dentils that continues the dentil pattern of the main cornice. The main cornice is a projecting wood cornice that wraps around the comers at the secondary elevations. Above the main cornice is a brick parapet with tracery vents and a wood coping (now covered with metal). Originally, the porch roofs featured a wood balustrade with tracery similar to the vents. This feature was removed prior to a 1936 tax photograph. The six porches each feature a curved-slat wrought-iron balustrade and wood rail. All the wood elements are painted white to contrast with the red brick. Each porch has an exterior three- quarter glass door with transom, screen and wide sidelights." The basement windows in the fa9ade are one-over-one windows with flat stone lintels. The original windows on the secondary elevations are mostly Victorian in style. However, the north elevation does feature flat-head wide windows and tripartite casements on each level. The upper apartments on the south and west (rear) elevations feature both tripartite windows and square fixed-frame windows. The window heads are segmental-arched three-course brick heads and the sills are stone (painted gray). There are three basement windows in the foundation on the north and south elevations. These windows have three panes of glass in a wood sash. The stone belt course above the foundation becomes four courses of brick around on the secondary elevations. The belt course remains painted gray. As the belt course meets the basement windows on the rear, the brick courses become segmental arched rowlock brick window heads. The brick is painted dark gray, but is peeling in places revealing the softer red brick of the secondary elevations. The west elevation also taller paired double-hung windows where the foundation is more visible due to the sloping site. The upper windows on the west elevation are narrow one-over-one double-hung windows. There are a few metal vents in the foundation walls. The rear elevation entrances to the apartments have been modified at least twice since 1906. The 1911 Sanbom fire insurance map indicates the recessed rear entrance was enclosed with frame and featured a central open elevator.' The sandstone steps flanking the current entrance suggest that two exits on the rear flanked the elevator before it was removed (circa 1970s). The original wood staircase is located deep in the recess. The brick and foundation in the recess have been painted red (date unknown). Around 1980, the rear enclosure was covered with vertical siding (now painted light gray). The current rear door is half-glass with a square transom (circa 1980). Details in the recess, such as double-hung exterior windows and rock-face brick at the angles suggest that the original rear enclosure was more open to view than the current enclosure (possibly screened). Original bead board ceilings are still visible within the individual porch enclosures. The current enclosure has aluminum slider windows. There is a blocked basement door facing north on the rear enclosure (circa 1980, blocked later). There is about ten feet of space between the south elevation of the Sampson and the north elevation of the Altadena Apartments. The two buildings share a wrought-iron fire escape in the alley space. On the interior, the Altadena Apartments has approximately 2,210 square feet on each floor. The front stairwell is open and features a square-baluster balustrade with newel posts. The mailboxes are mounted on the main level foyer. The carpet and tile are later replacements. There are two units per landing with approximately 970 square feet of space each. The basement unit is slightly smaller at 925 square feet. There is also a common laundry room and boiler room in the basement. Although some of the interiors have been altered by the owners after the conversion to condominiums, the • One of the doors has been replaced with a four-panel door. Other alterations on the porches include the installation of planter boxes, but the changes are reversible and have minimal impact on the historic inEgrity of the building. " The elevator was noted on the 1936 tax card, but was described as a dumb waiter on the later tax cards through the 1960s. It may have not been used for passengers in the second half of the twentieth century. NPS Form 10 900.a Uah MS Word Format MB No 1024-0018 {Expires M1/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 7 Page 3 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT configuration of Unit 2 is representative of the original interiors. This unit features a short central hall extending north from the front door. The kitchen and rear porch are to the west, the bathroom is to the east. The living room is in the northeast comer with access to the exterior porch. There are paneled pocket doors between the living room and an office in the rear. The bedroom is off the main hall. There is a built-in closet in the bedroom and the hall. The kitchen has its original built-in cabinets w ith glass doors. Many of the elements of the original apartment have been retained such as the claw foot tub, paneled doors (with half-glass to the kitchen), pocket doors, hardwood floors, wood casings, moldings above the doors and window, built-ins, and radiators.^ The basement unit was not original and has later features (some historic). The Altadena and Sampson Apartments share common site features. There is only a few feet of setback on the street sides (along 300 South and 300 East). There is a concrete sidewalk between parking strip with trees and lawn and the lawn next to the buildings. Access to the rear of the buildings from 300 East is blocked by chain link gates between the two buildings, and between the Altadena and the neighboring building to the south. The remainder of the parcel is paved with asphalt for parking on the west side. This parking area is shared by the adjacent parcel. There is a small tree behind the Altadena. The neighborhood of the Altadena and Sampson is a mixed-use neighborhood only a few blocks east of Salt Lake City's commercial business district. Notable buildings in the area include the YWCA complex and First Church of Christ, Scientist just to the east, and the newer Broadway Condominiums to the west.' The Altadena and Sampson Apartments, built in 1906, have remarkable historic integrity. They meet the registration requirements of the property type. Urban Apartment Buildings, as described in the Multiple Property Listing, Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion into the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s to 1930s. The Altadena Apartments is a contributing historic resource in Salt Lake City. "* The amount of original material varies by unit. Some units retain the original kitchen cabinetry. Not all units were inspected for this nomination. ^ The First Church of Christian Science is historically associated with the Sampson and Altadena Apartments (see Section 8). It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1977. Altadena Apartments Name of Property 8. Description Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing.) ^ A Property Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. O B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ^ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. • D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" In all the boxes that apply.) Property is: n A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. • B removed from its original location. • C a birthplace or grave. • Da cemetery. • E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. • Fa commemorative property. • G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used In preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets. Salt Lake Citv. Salt Lake Countv. Utah City, County and State Areas of Significance (enter categories from instructions) ARCHITECTURE COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Period of Significance 1906-1945 Significant Dates 1906 Significant Persons (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/A Architect/Builder Builder: August Rudine SSee continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 8 Previous documentation on file (NPS): n preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested • previously listed in the National Register • previously determined eligible by the National Register • designated a National Historic Landmark • recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # • recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # Primary location of additional data: ^ State Historic Preservation Office • Other State agency • Federal agency • Local government • University • Other Name of repository: ^See continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 9 OMBNo 1024.001t . NPSFotm United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Narrative Statement of Significance The Altadena Apartments, built in 1906, is locally significant under Criterion A and C for its associations with the urbanization of Salt Lake City in the early twentieth century. Between 1900 and 1935, Salt Lake City experienced rapid growth and the urban apartment block emerged as a new housing option in the neighborhoods adjacent to the city's commercial center. The availability of urban apartments was particular significant during this period of growth as a response to the suburbanization of the city's outlying neighborhoods beginning in the 1890s. Urban apartments were an important housing option for Salt Lake City's immigrant population and an influx of young people moving from Utah rural towns to the capitol city in search of employment. The first owners were Octavius and Eunice Sampson, who were part-time residents as well as the managers of this building and the Sampson Apartments next door for nearly four decades. The period of significance is 1906 to 1945, from the date of construction to the year the Sampson family sold the property. The Neoclassical three-story brick Altadena Apartments and its associated building, the Sampson Apartments, were early examples from this period of apartment construction, during which time the typical apartment block was a three-story walk-up with two units on each floor flanking a central staircase. The Altadena and Sampson apartment blocks standout as high-end architectural representatives of the property type. The Neoclassical architectural ornamentation of the building has been exceptionally well-preserved, especially when compared to similar extant apartment blocks from the period. Architecturally, the Altadena Apartments stands out for the relatively upscale amenities found in the units. The building had an exterior elevator, only found on a few early apartment blocks. On the interior, each unit was larger than typical for the period with a large kitchen and a bathroom. The Altadena Apartments is architecturally significant and represents the financial resources of the Sampson family, as well as the craftsmanship of the builder, August Rudine. The building is significant under the Multiple Property Documentation for the Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion in the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s-1930s, also known as the Salt Lake City Urban Apartments MPS. The Altadena Apartments has excellent historic integrity and contributes to the historic resources of one of Salt Lake City's oldest neighborhoods. History of the Altadena and Sampson Apartments At the tum of the nineteenth century, there were three adobe houses at the northeast comer of Block 54. In February 1904, Adelaide M. Williams sold the comer property to Anna Rudine. One month later, Anna Rudine also acquired the adjacent property from Victoria S. Hillier. Anna "'Annie'" Nelson Rudine (1865-1943) was bom in Norway and came to the United States in 1883. In 1892, she married August Rudine in California. August Rudine (1862-?) was a Swedish immigrant who came to the United States in 1882. August Rudine was listed as a bricklayer in an 1893-1894 city directory for Los Angeles. The couple had one son bom in Califomia before moving to Sah Lake City in 1895. They had three more sons bom in Utah. August Rudine continued to be listed as a bricklayer in the Salt Lake City directories in the late 1890s. By 1900, August Rudine had established himself as a general contractor in the Salt Lake area. In the 1920s, the family moved back to Califomia. In June 1905, Rudine had an agreement to sell the property to R. E. McConaughy, but the transaction never occurred. Robert E. McConaughy (1859-1924) was bom in Illinois and moved from Nebraska to Utah in 1880s. He established one ofthe largest real estate and development companies in Salt Lake City in the first quarter of the twentieth century. It is OMBNO 1024-00H. NPS Fomi United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 2 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT not known whether he was involved in the construction ofthe Altadena and Sampson Apartments. The Rudines sold the south nine rods to Emma Whiting (1861-1919) in 1904. Emma Whiting sold to O. T. Sampson in June 1905. On April 26, 1906, August and Anna Rudine sold the comer property to O. T. Sampson. On May 31, 1906, O. T. Sampson obtained two Salt Lake City building permits, each for a three-story terrace apartment block of 68 rooms to be built for an estimated cost of $25,000 at the comer of 300 East and 300 South. No architect or builder was listed on the building permit. Considering the interests of August Rudine in the property, it is likely he was the builder for the project.^ Octavius T. Sampson (1867-1945) was bom in Comwall, England. He came to the United States in 1895. Octavius Sampson married Eunice Elgan in Soda Springs, Idaho, in 1899. Eunice Elgan Sampson (1881-1965) was bom in Saint Clark, Missouri. The couple had two sons, James L. and Octavius T. Jr., bom in Idaho before they moved to Salt Lake City in 1906. Their oldest son James Louis Sampson died of epilepsy at the age of twenty. Their daughter, Altadena, was bom in Salt Lake City in 1908. The Altadena Apartments were originally known as Vivian Flats. The name was changed only a few years after Altadena's birth. Octavius and Eunice Sampson were members of the First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Sah Lake City. Their decision to purchase the Rudine property was likely to do its proximity to the large stone meetinghouse at 352 E. 300 South.'' The congregation had completed building the edifice just a few years previously in 1898. According to oral tradition passed along by older neighbors, the Sampsons were very prominent in the church and built the apartment blocks so that members of the congregation could live there.* The 1906 city directory lists Octavius Sampson living at the address 354 E. 300 South, which is either the church building or the brick house next to it.' Newspaper subscribers listed in the Salt Lake Herald suggest that the apartments were occupied as early as December 1906. By 1907, the Sampsons are living at 310 S. 300 East. The name Sampson Flats is used for both buildings in some sources, but Vivian (later Altadena) had a separate name by 1907. In the winter of 1907, Octavius and Eunice Sampson were living in the Sampson Flats when a burglar entered their apartment. The thief was chased off by the upstairs neighbor, S. A. Giffin, who went to get his revolver.'" The Sampsons were a relatively prosperous family. Various sources list Octavius Sampson's occupation as an apartment manger, a sheepman, and a farmer. By the time ofthe 1910 census, the family was living on a farm in south Salt Lake, but Octavius still gave his occupation as landlord. He is listed as a farmer at 2943 S. 300 East on the 1920 and 1930 census enumerations. In 1930, Octavius T. Jr. was an auto mechanic. R. E. McConaughy was listed as a builder for other projects he developed. Another possible builder is W. C. A. Vissing (1874- 1936), a Danish immigrant, who was one of the earliest apartment builders in the city. Andy Vissing built the Cluff Apartments located at 1270-1280 E. 200 South (NRHP 10/20/1989), which has similar architectural detail to the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. ' The First Church of Christ, Scientist, was listed on the NRHP in 1976, only the second church of that denomination to be listed at the time. The Richardsonian-Romanesque building was designed by the prominent Salt Lake architect, Walter E. Ware. * Correspondence of Allison D. Johnson to the First Church of Christ, Scientist, Communications Office located in the files of Emily Evans. There are no membership records available for the period. A high percentage of early tenants were from the mid-west, but the transient nature of the occupants makes them difficult to trace. ' The address ofthe house is 360 E. 300 South. The 1907-1908 Salt Lake City Blue Book lists Mr. and Mrs. Octavius C. [sic] Sampson living at 354 S. 300 East, which is a duplex. Either way, they were living in the area while the apartments were being constructed. ^'^ Salt Lalie Herald. December 1, 1907. OMB No 1024.0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 3 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT By the mid-1930s, Octavius and Eunice Sampson moved back into town into the Altadena Apartments as resident- managers. Octavius T. Sampson died on March 9, 1945. His occupation was listed on his death certificate was apartment building landlord. Eunice E. Sampson, and her children Octavius T. Sampson, Jr., and Altadena Sampson Cole, sold the property in October 1945 to the Page Investment Company. She moved to a house on Stratford Avenue where she lived until her death in July 1965. The Sampsons are interred in Mount Olivet Cemetery. Items in the local newspapers suggest that the early tenants of the Sampson and Vivian/Altadena buildings were middle to upper-middle class. The name of the buildings appears in the society columns for parties and other social events. One resident of the Vivian Flats, J. J. Ott, placed an advertisement for a lost diamond pin, which he lost somewhere between the Christian Science Church and North Temple." Anonymous Vivian Flats residents placed an advertisement for a young girl to do housework.'^ The residents of the Altadena Apartments listed on the 1910 census enumeration were all couples between their thirties and sixties in age. No servants were listed, but one couple had two lodgers living with them. Another couple had two grown daughters at home and one couple was living with a mother-in-law. With one exception, all ofthe residents were bom in the Midwest, New York or Colorado. The one immigrant was born in Canada. There were no Utah natives living in the Altadena in 1910. The occupations listed on the 1910 census include a lawyer/judge, three real estate agents (one specializing in mining), a clerk in a railroad shop, and two managers (one for an implement company and one for a saloon). The Ott family was still living in the building in 1910. On the 1920 census, seven units are listed for the building, so it is likely the basement was added sometime in the mid- 1910s. Three of the households were couples with no children. One couple lived with a mother-in-law. There were three single heads of household: one lived with a mother, one with a daughter, and one with a daughter and son-in-law. Although the Altadena units were somewhat smaller than the Sampson, they did accommodate extended family living arrangements. The residents were older than those found on the 1910 census. The youngest resident was twenty-seven and the oldest was sixty-three. Five residents were bom in Utah. The rest came from Illinois, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Arizona and Canada. With the exception of the Sampsons, there were no residents who stayed longer than a decade during the historic period, which was typical for Salt Lake apartments in the first half of the twentieth century. Only five units were listed on the 1930 census enumeration. Eleven of the seventeen residents in 1930 were born in Utah. The others were bom in Colorado, Arizona, Califomia and Pennsylvania. In contrast to the previous censuses, half of the employed residents were working women. Their occupations included a dry goods saleslady, a school teacher, a stenographer and two typists. The men were employed as a miner, a bank clerk, a printer, and a railroad clerk. The youngest resident was thirteen and the oldest was seventy-five. One household was exceptionally large with a mother, two daughters, and two female boarders. After Octavius T. Sampson death in 1945, the Sampson family sold the property to the Page Investment Company in October 1945.In April 1947, Meredith and Maurine S. Page deeded their interest in the propertj' to Gwynne and Duke Page. The Page Investment Company owned and managed the property until 1972, when it was sold to Donald B. Hadley " Salt Lake Herald, January 5, 1907. ^-Salt Lake Herald November 16, 1908. The deed was transferred from the Sampsons to Riverton Motor Company on October 13, 1945, and then on the same day to the Page Investment Company. OMB No 1024.0018 NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 4 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT et al. This period coincided with a general decline in the urban apartment market in downtown Salt Lake City and was likely when the rear enclosure was made more secure. Subsequent owners of the property include GT Real Estate, and later Capitol Redevelopment. The buildings were converted to condominiums in 1998 after the declaration of the Sampson Altadena Condominiums. The conversion and ongoing rehabilitation of the two buildings is part of a general renaissance in urban living in Salt Lake City, which began in the 1990s. The units currently have multiple owners with the common areas owned by the Sampson Altadena Homeowners Association. Salt Lake City Development and the Architecture of the Altadena and Sampson Apartments On July 24, 1847, a small contingent of members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS or Mormon Church) entered the Salt Lake Valley under the direction of Brigham Young. On August 2, 1847, a little more than a week later, the first city survey, known as Plat A, consisting of 135 blocks, was completed. The land was divided into ten-acre blocks, each containing eight lots of one and one-quarter acres. Streets were 132 wide feet. One house could be constructed on each lot with a standard setback of twenty feet from the front of the property. The first Sanbom map to cover Plat A's Block 54 was produced in 1898 and show three adobe dwellings (two single-family and one duplex) at the comer of 300 South and 300 East. Between the late 1840s and 1900, the population of Salt Lake City had grown from 6,000 to 54,000. By the time of the 1910 census the population had grown to 92,777. This transformation from agrarian village to a bustling urban metropolis was spurred by the railroads, which brought an increase in every type of manufacturing and commerce, as well as an enormous influx of immigrant laborers and their families. The original lots of the each ten-acre block had been divided and subdivided until most of the Plat A blocks had inner-block streets, courts and places. During this period there was a great range of architecture in the early neighborhoods. Pioneer settlement adobe and frame hall- parlors were intermingled with brick and frame Victorian cottages. Multiple-family dwellings first appeared as double houses, which became popular in the 1890s. By the tum of the century the city core had developed into an urban commercial district with high-rise office buildings and multiple streetcar lines. During the first half of the twentieth century, the rapid increase in the city's population created a demand for housing that was met by two diametrically opposed types of housing: central city apartments and subdivision homes.''' The city instigated massive urban improvement projects such as water mains, sewage facilities, electrical lines and telephone service, both in the central city and in the emerging suburbs. Rising land values and urban congestion made the apartment house a feasible investment for developers. This was noted in a Salt Lake Tribune that appeared in 1902, just as the first major apartments were being constructed: "It is generally recognized by farseeing investors that the period of cottages in Salt Lake has reached its highest point and the period of flat buildings, marking another stage in the evolution from town to city, has just begun."'^ Over 180 apartment buildings, all built by private investors, were constructed in Salt Lake City during the first three decades of the twentieth century. The emergence of apartment building also presented a practical housing altemative for those residents who could not (or would not) take advantage the increasing attractive and convenient suburbs. Though, the vast majority consisted of apartments for the middle class, a few early urban apartments were more luxury units, including the Altadena and Sampson Apartments. The later period of apartment construction in Salt Lake City, in the Roger Roper, Salt Lake City Urban Apartments, MPS, 1989. " Salt Lake Tribune, July 27, 1902: 32. Quoted in MPS. OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 5 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT 1920s and 1930s, were primarily large-scale double-loaded corridor apartments that were built for the middle and higher working classes. The gradual transformation of some of these buildings into housing for the inner-city poor did not take place until the last quarter of the twentieth century. In fact, the economic status of the early apartment dwellers was virtually the same as that of suburban homeowners of the same period, middle and upper-middle class. The major difference between the two groups was transitory nature of apartment dwellers. Tenants were often in transitional phases of their lives. Common occupants include newly married or childless couples, widows and widowers, retirees, and working single adults. The Sampson family and their fellow tenants represent a somewhat higher socio-economic strata than the general demographic trends for the period, although they were just as transitory. The Altadena and Sampson, built in 1906, are excellent examples of an early apartment complex built for the architectural tastes and comforts of the upper-middle class. The Neoclassical architectural detail in the brick and stone masonry is exceptional. While a few amenities in the two buildings, such as built-in cupboards and exterior porches were typical for the period, several features were atypically luxurious. A cursory study ofthe 1911 Sanborn maps reveals only a handful of contemporaneous multi-story apartment blocks with elevators. Although the 1906 open elevator at the rear of apartments would be considered crude by today's standards, it would have been considered a luxury in its day. The interior of the original units are particularly striking for their numerous windows. The four and five-room units are considerably larger than the average turn-of-the-century apartment in Salt Lake City, and the over-sized (by today's standards) kitchen and bathroom in each unit were particularly commodious. Each unit included one or two built-in closets, a rare feature in 1906. One indication of the upscale condition of the apartments can be found in a rare complimentary comment written by an anonymous tax assessor on the December 1936 tax cards for both the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. On both cards, the assessor wrote "These apts. have been keep in the best of condition.'"'^ The Altadena and Sampson Apartments are two of twenty-five extant examples of walk-up apartments built between 1903 and 1915. Although a few walk-ups were buih after 1915, they lack exterior porches and are stylistically distinct from the earlier examples. Eighteen of these examples have been classified as Neoclassical or Colonial Revival in style. The rest were influenced by the Prairie School. The Altadena and Sampson are most similar in style to several apartment blocks built by W.C.A. Vissing (1874-1936). The closest example is the Cluff Apartments (later Hillview, listed on the NRHP 10/20/1989). The Cluff has similar porches, but is a much wider building and lacks the distinctive brickwork found on the Altadena and Sampson buildings. Twin apartment blocks are rare in Salt Lake City. Vissing also built the dual Princeton and Boulevard Apartments located on the comer of 900 East and 100 South. The Princeton and Boulevard Apartments feature colossal Ionic columns on the exterior porches (NRHP listed in the Salt Lake Eastside Historic District, Bryant Neighborhood, 2001). Vissing also built several blocks for the Covey Investment Company that are Neoclassical in style. The Covey blocks and those like them are larger in scale, closer to downtown and mostly U-courts. Most did not include the amenities found in the Altadena and Sampson Apartments. There are numerous smaller apartment blocks located within the Salt Lake City Avenues Historic District. The Avenues neighborhood has a fairly steep slope and most of the apartment blocks were more modest in size and had smaller units than the Sampson and Altadena Apartments. The Altadena and Sampson are particularly well-preserved and most of the typical modifications found on contemporaneous buildings (porch enclosures and removals, window and door replacements, etc.) have been avoided. Salt Lake County tax assessor cards, December 18, 1936. It was much more common for the assessor to note deficits such as crumbling brick or cheap materials. OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 8 Page 6 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Constructed in 1906, the Altadena Apartments, and its companion, the Sampson Apartments, are two of the many urban apartments built in Salt Lake City during the first three decades of the twentieth centur>'. This was an unprecedented era of expansion and urbanization in the city. The period of significance for the Altadena and Sampson Apartments is between 1906 and 1945, which represents this important era. The upscale amenities designed for the original construction of the Altadena and Sampson Apartments, just those amenities that were desirable qualities when the buildings were converted to condominiums in 1989. Urban apartments are significant under Criterion C as an important residential building type that emerged as Salt Lake City was transformed into an urban center during the early twentieth centur>\ Both buildings meet the registration requirements and are significant under the Multiple Property Documentation for the Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion in the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s- 1930s, also known as the Salt Lake City Urban Apartments MPS. OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Form United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. 9 Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Bibliography Carter, Thomas and Peter Goss. Utah's Historic Architecture, 1847-1940, A Guide. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press, 1988. Evans, Emily. Interviews conducted by author May 2009 to July 2009. . Research file on the Sampson Altadena Apartments. Fohlin, E. V. SaU Lake City Past and Present: A Narrative of Its History and Romance, Its People and Cultures, Its Industry and Commerce, Its Attractions and Grandeurs, Its Bright and Promising Future With Chapters of Utah's General Resources And Progressiveness. Salt Lake City, Utah: E. V. Fohlin, 1908. Polk Directories, Salt Lake City, 1900-1993. Published by R.L. Polk & Co. Available at the Utah State Historical Society and the Marriott Library, University ofUtah. Roper, Roger V. Historic Resources of Salt Lake City, Urban Expansion into the Early Twentieth Century, 1890s-1930s, [Salt Lake City Urban Apartments] Multiple Property Documentation Form. Prepared 1989. Available at the Utah State Historic Preservation Office. [Salt Lake County Tax Cards]. Available at the Salt Lake County Archives. [Salt Lake County Title Abstracts]. Available at the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. Salt Lake Herald. Salt Lake Tribune. [Altadena Apartments, 310 S. 300 East, Salt Lake City, Utah]. Files of the Utah State Historic Preservation Office. Sanbom Fire Insurance Maps for Sah Lake City, 1898, 1911, and 1950. Available at the Utah State Historical Society and the University ofUtah Marriott Library United States Federal Census Enumerations. Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, 1900 to 1930. Utah Heritage Foundation. "Through the Eyes of Many Faiths.'" Compiled and edited by the members of the Church Tour Committee of the Utah Heritage Foundation, 1983 & 1990. [Utah State Historical Society Burials Database]. Available online at Historical Society's website (www.history.utah.gov). Altadena Apartments Name of Property 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 0.19 acre(s) Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah City. County and State UTM References (Place additional boundaries ofthe property on a continuation sheet.) A 1/2 4/2/5/5/6/0 4/5/1/2/5/4/0 B / I I I I I I I I I I I Zone Easting C_/_ I I I I I Zone Easting Northing I I I I I I Northing Zone Easting D / I I II I Zone Easting Northing I I I I I I Northing Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property.) BEG NE COR LOT 8, BLK 54, PLAT A, SLC SUR; S 111 FT; W 74.25 FT; N 111 FT; E 74.25 FT TO BEG. LESS UNITS 0.19 AC (BEING THE COMMON AREA OF SAMPSON ALTADENA CONDOMINIUM). Property Tax No. 16-06-184-001 to 16-06-184-018 Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected.) The boundaries are those which were historically associated with the property and which continue to be associated with the property. •See continuation sheet(s) for Section No. 10 11. Form Prepared By name/title Korral Broschinsky, Preservation Documentation Resource organization prepared for the Sampson Altadena Homeowners' Association street & number PO Box 58766 city or town Salt Lake City date October 1, 2009 telephone 801-913-5645 state UT zip code 84158 Additional Documentation . .... .... Submit the following items with the completed fonn: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs: Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items: (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner name/title Multiple Owners / Contact person: Emily Evans, Owner Representative (see Continuation Sheet) street & number 276 E. 300 South (Broadway Street), #S6 telephone 801-554-0730 city or town Salt Lake City state UT zip code 84111 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 ef seq.;. Estimated Burden Statement; Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this forni to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service. P O Box 37127, Washington. DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. OMB No 1024-OOH. NPS Fomi United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. Owner Contact Information Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Owners of the Altadena Apartments VnitU Unit Owner Alternate Address for Non-Occupants AOl Ian Gascoyne n/a A02 Candace Dewaal n/a AOS Melissa Mackie 0308 SW Montgomery #507 AOS Melissa Mackie Portland, OR 97201' A04 Kevin Emerson n/a A05 Joanna Marusienski n/a A06 Jon Wagstaff 4126 Parkview Drive SLC, UT 84124 A07 Amber Stackhouse n/a OMB No. 1024-0018, NPS Fonm United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. PHOTOS Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Common Label Information: 1. Altadena Apartments 2. 310 S. 300 East, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah 3. Photographer: Korral Broschinsky 4. Date: November 2009 5. Digital images on file at Utah SHPO. Photo No. 1: 6. East elevation of building. Camera facing west. Photo No. 2: 6. East and north elevations of building. Camera facing southwest. Photo No. 3: 6. West elevation of building. Camera facing east. Photo No. 4: 6. West and south elevations of building. Camera facing northeast. Photo No. 5: 6. Interior, Unit 2, living room and door to porch. Camera facing southeast. Photo No. 6: 6. East elevation ofbuilding, main level detail. Camera facing southwest. Photo No. 7: 6. East and south elevations of building. Camera facing northwest. Photo No. 8: 6. East elevations of Altadena (left) and Sampson (right). Camera facing west. Photo No. 9: 6. West elevations of Altadena (right) and Sampson (left). Camera facing east. Photo No. 10: 6. Interior, stairwell and main entrance. Camera facing east. Photo No. 11: 6. Interior, Unit 2, living room and pocket doors. Camera facing west. OMB No. 1024-001S, NPS Fomi United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. PHOTOS Page 2 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Photo No. 12: 6. Interior, Unit 2, office and pocket doors. Camera facing northeast. Photo No. 13: 6. Interior, Unit 2, kitchen cabinets. Camera facing northwest OMB No 1024-0018, NPS Fomi United States Department ofthe Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section No. HISTORIC PHOTOS Page 1 Altadena Apartments, Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, UT Sampson & Altadena Apartments, photographed August 7, 1907 31 0 S , 3 0 0 E a s t Sa l t L a k e C i t y , S a l t L a k e C o u n t y , U t a h Al t a d e n a A p a r t m e n t s in CD O p (X H O o I o H o CO Tl SD 0) IN ) Q-CD > T3 3 13 CD (D O 0) 0) o o c 13 O Z O f i ) • O c o > fi ) • • a: 7 J O 0 (0 o o "V fi ) o CD (A z c SI 5 . —• O A 3 Q . » S T JT ( A 0) o <D 3 3- S«! Sol State ofUtah GARY R. HERBERT Governor GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor Department of Community and Culture PALMER DePAULIS Executive Director State History PHILIP F. NOTARIANNI Division Director RECEIVED 2280 DEC 1 8 2009 . NATIONAL PARK SERVICE TO: .. Dr. Janet Matthews, Keeper, National Register of Historic Places FROM: Cory Jensen, National Register Coordinator Utah State Historic Preservation Office SUBJECT: National Register Nomination The following materials are submitted on this l ^ ^ "^ day nf^^:^vJjrO^ , 2009, for the nomination of the Altadena Apartments " ' to the National Register of Historic Places: w 1 Original National Register of Historic Places nomination form Multiple Property Nomination form 13 Photograph (s) (archival) _2 Photograph(s) (supplemental) J Gold Archival CD-R w/Image Files & Nomination PDF J Original USGS Map Sketch map (s)/figure (s) Pieces of Correspondence Other COMMENTS: Please review 5SIATE For questions please contact Cory Jensen at 801/533-3559, or coryjensen@utah.gov UTAH STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY • ANTIQUITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION RESEARCH CENTER «, COLLECTIONS 300 S. RIO GRANDE STREET SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101 -1182 • TELEPHONE 801 53J-3.SOO . FACSIMILE 801 533-3503 • HiSTORYUTAH.COV 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director Project Chronology Petition: PLNHLC2025-00357 April 11, 2025 Petition submitted by the applicant. May 7, 2025 Petition was deemed complete. May 7, 2025 Petition assigned to Noah Elmore, Principal Planner. May 23, 2025 Notice of petition sent to all City-recognized community organizations. May 27, 2025 Petition posted to the Planning Division’s Online Open House webpage. Public comment period ended July 23, 2025 June 26, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. July 3, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission staff report posted to Planning’s webpage. July 10, 2025 Historic Landmark Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. July 9, 2025 Planning Commission agenda posted to the website and emailed to the listserv. July 16, 2025 Planning Commission staff report posted to Planning’s webpage. July 23, 2025 Planning Commission meeting and public hearing held. A positive recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. August 14, 2025 Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office August 26, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s Office 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2024-01357. At the November 13, 2024 Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to initiate a zoning text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The petition also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other related provisions in Title 21A may also be modified as part of this proposal. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: TIME: 7:00 pm PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing for an in -person that opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Noah Elmore at (801) 535-7971 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at noah.elmore@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2024-01357. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, (801) 535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 1 November 1, 2024 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS Staff Report To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Nick.norris@slc.gov or 801-535-6173 Date: November 13, 2024 Re: Petition initiation requested by Planning Commission to modify the provision that prohibits some land uses from being within 1,000 feet of single and two family zoning districts. Petition Initiation REQUEST: The commission recently requested that a work session item be placed on an agenda to discuss broadening the applicability of a regulation that prohibits certain land uses within 1,000 feet of single- and two-family zoning districts. The request proposed expanding the 1,000-foot prohibition to any residential zoning district. The purpose of this request is to protect the health and safety of residents living in other zoning districts, not just those who live in a single- or two- family district. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the commission initiate a petition that would potentially expand the regulation that prohibits some land uses that are detrimental to the health and safety of residents from being located within 1,000 feet of a single- or two-family zoning district to apply to other residential zoning districts where people live. The following motion may be considered by the commission: “I move that the commission initiate a text amendment to review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot spacing requirement from residential zoning districts. The initiation may include reviewing other land uses that should have the provision applied, clarifying whether the distance applies to the property or the boundaries of a use, and other related provisions that may help protect the health and safety of city residents.” ATTACHMENTS: A. ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 2 November 1, 2024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Planning Commission recently asked the Planning Division to provide some background information on a potential text amendment related to the spacing requirements between some land uses and single- or two-family residential zoning districts. Specifically, the commission asked if that wording should be changed so the spacing requirement would apply more equitably to all residential zoning districts and not just the single- and two-family zoning districts. The commission also asked about clarifying how the measurement is applied so the spacing applied if any portion of the property is within 1,000 feet. The purpose of the footnote is to prohibit land uses that generate noise, odor, pollution and other impacts that negatively impact the health and/or safety of people who live near such uses. The allowed land uses in each zoning district are listed in tables found in 21A.33. The uses listed are shown as either permitted or conditional. If the table does not indicate that the use is permitted or conditional, then the use is considered prohibited. Some land uses in some zoning districts include footnotes that typically further restrict a specific land use under specific circumstances. One of the footnotes found in the land use tables reads “Prohibited within 1,000 feet of a Single- or Two-Family Zoning District.” A sample of the uses that this footnote applies are in the table below. Zoning Districts Permitted or Conditional M-2, P The table indicates that most of the land uses with this provision are in the M-1 Light Manufacturing Zoning District and the M-2 Heavy Manufacturing Zoning District. Some of the uses are also in the CG General Commercial Zoning District or the EI Extractive Industry Zoning District. If the commission initiates a petition, a more thorough review of the land use tables will identify all land uses that are subject, or should be subject, to the footnote provision. 3 November 1, 2024 All but two of the other land uses with the provision are in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. Attachment A includes maps that show portions of the M-1, M-2, and EI zoning districts that are within 1,000-feet of a residential zoning district. The maps show that the land impacted by the 1,000-foot buffer are all in the Capitol Hill, Northwest, and Westside Planning Communities. The maps show single- and two- family zoning districts in yellow and all other residential districts in orange. The A-Agriculture zones are included as well because they allow single family dwellings on large lots. The intent of separating out the zoning districts is to demonstrate how the provision currently applies (residential shown in yellow on the maps) and how it may apply if modified to apply to all residential districts. The “Theater, Live Performance” land use was recently reviewed by the Planning Commission because the City Council initiated a text change to expand where this use is allowed. That land use would not be considered as part of this initiation as a result. There are likely other land uses within the land use table that create pollution and other health or safety impacts where this provision may be appropriate. As part of the review, the land use tables will be analyzed in more detail to identify the uses that create health and safety impacts to determine if the uses should be subject to the proposal. The analysis will also review the land use tables that are part of the zoning consolidation project. It is possible that the footnote may be applied to other zoning districts, be modified as well, or additional footnotes added based on the analysis. APPROVAL PROCESS AND COMMISSION AUTHORITY The commission has the authority to initiate a zoning amendment. To do so, the action must be advertised on the agenda with at least 24 hours public notice, a commissioner must make a motion to initiate the amendment, and then a majority of the commissioners present must vote to initiate the petition. If an amendment is approved, the Planning Division will research the relevant changes, draft the proposed changes, check in with the commission to ensure the changes are consistent with what the commission intends, and then start the public engagement process. The desired output of the process is to update the code to protect health and safety by limiting how close some impactful land uses are to where people live and to do so as quickly as possible to limit the possibility of the identified uses being established. 4 November 1, 2024 ATTACHMENT A: Maps of areas impacted by the 1,000-foot spacing requirement 5 November 1, 2024 6 November 1, 2024 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/26/2025 Date Sent To Council: 08/29/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Anthony Wright to the Arts Council for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Anthony Wright currently lives in District 6. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/26/2025 Date Sent To Council: 08/29/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Denise B to the Arts Council for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Denise B currently lives in District 3. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/26/2025 Date Sent To Council: 08/29/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Pablo Cruz-Avalo to the Arts Council for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Pablo Cruz-Avalo currently lives in District 5. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/26/2025 Date Sent To Council: 08/29/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Arts Council Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Nick Pedersen to the Arts Council for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Nick Pedersen currently lives in District 2. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER APPOINTMENT To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 08/21/2025 Date Sent To Council: 08/26/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the reappointment of Aaron Wiley to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Aaron Wiley currently lives in District 1. Approved:* Otto, Rachel Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 9/3/2025 10:49 Tamra Burton Comment to City Council Tamra Burton with Asset Management Services called about increased sewer rates and their properties. The rates at this property have increased significantly under the new rate structure. The constituent inquired about potential solutions, including a separate irrigation meter. Austin connected with Ms. Burton and requested assistance from Public Utilities to work with the constituent directly. Ms. Burton also intends to attend Tuesday's Council meeting to provide comments. 9/3/2025 16:34 Michael McIntosh PLNPCM2025-00320, File Z 20250132 Dear Salt Lake City Council, My name is J. Michael McIntoshand I live at REDACTED, Salt Lake City , 84108. I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed Zoning Text Amendment (Case #PLNPCM2025- 00320), which was scheduled for a public hearing on September 2, 2025. I am deeply concerned about this city- wide amendment that would apply to all public schools. My primary objections are: • Excessive Building Height: The proposal to increase the maximum building height for schools to 125 feet is a dramatic change that will negatively impact residential neighborhoods. This is an extreme height that is out of scale with our communities. • Drastically Reduced Setbacks: The minimum distance from property lines would be cut in half, allowing these large structures to be built as close as 30 feet from homes on the side and 50 feet in the rear. This will directly impact sunlight, privacy, and the overall character of my neighborhood. This proposal sets a dangerous precedent by giving away local control over fundamental development standards like height and setbacks. I urge you to deny this petition and uphold the zoning laws that protect our quality of life and the character of our neighborhoods. I live near Bonneville, Clayton and East and I am concerned about a building of this scale being constructed so close to my home." Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Michael McIntosh 9/4/2025 10:51 Kadee Nielson Phone call to City Council Caller would like to talk to Victoria about the proposed homeless housing in Rose Park. She is very against it and thinks there are better places then in their neighborhood. Transfer to Vili. 9/4/2025 12:23 Marianne Errebo SLCPD Pride Parade On 8 June 2025, I looked down from my fourth story balcony onto West Temple and the line-up for the Pride Day parade. And in that line I saw no less than a Salt Lake City Police car displaying a large Pride flag. Wait, what?! You mean that now Salt Lake citizens’ tax money is going to a police department to promote special interest groups? Shouldn’t the only flags that our Salt Lake Police Dept. display be the US or Utah flag… flags representing all citizens of Salt Lake City? Should I expect to see a Black Lives Matter flag next? Who, in the world, was responsible for this lack of good taste in the Salt Lake City Police Department, a department that is otherwise commendable in so many ways? It calls into question the credibility and dignity that should be afforded our police force. I urge you to investigate this and I look forward to your reply. Yours truly, Marianne Errebo 9/4/2025 13:48 Heather Wilkins Drug use in Salt Lake City So I don't feel this problem bring us into thriving in our city. These homeless need to be put into mental hospitals and pulled off the streets for everyone's benefit. 9/4/2025 15:46 Traci Johanson Phone call to City Council Caller is upset about the increase in the public utilities bill for her business. She understands the need to increase prices but this is too much. Her sewer bill went from $40 to $240 and the water for her sprinkler system, that she is required to have, went from $6 to $33. Her business won't last with the continued increase. She contacted Public Utilities and they told her it was for the next year and the Council set it, not them. Information given to Austin. 9/5/2025 10:43 Karen Mccreary (EXTERNAL) Semi Trucks on our neighborhood streets Constituents are concerned about large semi-trucks commuting often on the roads in the neighborhood. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 9/5/2025 13:40 Anonymous Constituent Comment to City Council Hi Council Members, I spoke with Traci Johanson with Card Signs at 2100 South 900 West. This is a follow up to the call and comment provided earlier. Ms. Johanson is frustrated about the new increased sewer rates. She said her company does work for the Police Department, and are only allowed to increase their costs by 3% per the contract. So she's frustrated the utility rates have increased by more than this amount and does not think that it's fair. She states it was more affordable for her when the stabilization fee was in place last year. She wants to stay informed the next time rates are considered. I encouraged her to sign up for Public Utilities' newsletter, follow them on social media, and I let her know I would sign her up for her Council Members' newsletter to stay engaged. She appreciated the call back but remains frustrated. Passing her comments along for your awareness. Thank you 9/5/2025 16:39 Bernie HART Light ... we need light ...Dear Council, I find it interesting that the people who pretend they have the backs of the people they represent, and the homeless, make decisions that will have a major impact on their quality of life behind closed doors. The Council Member representing the District housing the latest "new and greater, Big Beautiful ... can't fail ... homeless shelter" is the same Councilperson who blocked my emails when I suggested that the Salt Lake City Council was exhibiting a high degree of III (Intentional Institutional Ignorance) when discussing homelessness. The other party to this Big Beautiful Project, the Homeless Oversight Committee, has always been reluctant to provide any information on how well "supportive mental health and addiction programs" work. The programs that will be at the center of how the shelter impacts the lives of the homeless and the nearby community. You all, and Mr Niederhauser and Mr Shumway, tell us how great this will work and then refuse to talk about it. Shame on you all. III doesn't get it ... humm.... I like to say it ... "Intentional Institutional Ignorance" only survives behind closed doors and in the dark. Now, tell me again, how much you all care about the homeless. No. don't tell me... start showing us. You all have been telling the people you represent, and the homeless, that you care and have the answer, and our jails are overflowing, overdose deaths are up, and the number of homeless in Utah increased last year ... by how much ... Please open the door, then look for the light switch, flip the switch, and then start the conversation ..... Bernie 9/5/2025 16:53 Jordan Anderson Public Comment on Proposed Homeless Shelter Location Dear Salt Lake City Council, My name is Jordan Anderson, and I am a resident of North Salt Lake. I would like to share my concerns regarding the newly approved homeless shelter location. I respectfully ask why this site was chosen so close to residential neighborhoods, especially considering it is only about three miles from Spectrum Academy (a school for children with special needs) and just a few miles from an elementary school. I believe these factors make the location concerning for families in the area. As someone who has volunteered with the Road Home, I have seen firsthand the struggles individuals experiencing homelessness face, including mental health challenges, most of them carry a sharp weapons, and some of them even a sex offenders. I understand the importance of providing services and shelter. However, safety is also a critical concern, particularly when it comes to children and schools. I would encourage the Council to consider alternative locations, such as areas closer to the prison or other sites further from residential neighborhoods and schools. This could better balance the need for services with the safety and peace of nearby communities. Thank you for your time and consideration. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss further. Sincerely, Jordan Anderson North Salt Lake Resident 9/8/2025 16:35 Ron Nelson Phone call to City Council A Constituent in D2 Calling to leave a comment to Victoria and would like a contact back in regarding of the construction to fix the pipe line in North temple because he believed all these are benefits the new apartment and not all the other resident, he would like to discuss. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 9/9/2025 11:02 Evelyn Bossart Phone call to City Council The constituent is calling and would like speak to Chris and prefer to have Chris calling her back in regarding of the sewer bill that she's unable to pay and she needs Chris taking an action right away, Tucky let her know that Olivia will be in contact with her asap. 9/9/2025 13:55 Emily Sloan-Pace DCC follow-up response to SEG Parking Garage Proposal . Response from the Salt Lake City Downtown Neighborhood Community Council As representatives of the downtown community, we strongly oppose Smith Entertainment Group’s (SEG) request to override Salt Lake City’s ordinance requiring ground-floor activation. Constructing a private, vehicle-oriented garage with no meaningful pedestrian design undermines the city’s vision for a vibrant, inclusive downtown — and betrays the community values this ordinance was designed to protect. This project is not a neutral development. It uses taxpayer dollars to build an elites-only parking facility that serves corporate convenience rather than public need. In doing so, it breaks faith with the agreement SEG made with the City: that public support would yield public benefit. Instead of enriching shared spaces for residents, workers, and families, the proposal directs resources toward an exclusive structure that contributes nothing to daily downtown life. SEG has proven it can create immersive experiences for arena visitors and entertainment district patrons. Yet when it comes to public-facing infrastructure, its strategy prioritizes ticketholders while neglecting the broader community. The very ordinance they now seek to sidestep exists for good reason: to ensure that every new development “promotes future downtown growth that is safe…and encourages downtown living.” That vision is already visible in places like Copper Common, Artspace, Granary, and the Post District — where thoughtful design turned inactive frontage into dynamic, human-scaled gathering spaces. Utah Jazz President Jim Olson’s claim that “this corner is not adaptable to street activation and habitable space” dismisses both precedent and creativity. Cities across the country have balanced service needs with vibrant street life. From screened loading bays to flexible retail modules, proven design strategies exist. What’s lacking is not adaptability of the site, but SEG’s willingness to treat the community as more than a backdrop for private events. Approving this exemption would send the dangerous message that Salt Lake City’s ordinances are optional whenever private interests press hard enough. It would sacrifice safety, vitality, and inclusivity for a facility that walls off public life while consuming public dollars. For these reasons, we urge City leaders to hold firm to the ordinance and require SEG to honor both the letter and spirit of its agreement with the community. Our streets, sidewalks, and public funds should serve all Salt Lake residents — not just those with privileged access behind garage doors. [Delivered by Emily Sloan-Pace, Vice Chair DCC]