Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/25/2025 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING   November 25, 2025 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings.  Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chris Wharton, Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy, Vice Chair District 2 Victoria Petro District 1 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7   Generated: 11:57:07 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Sarah Young will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of July 8, 2025, as well as the formal meeting minutes for September 2, 2025. 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall declaring November as Native American Heritage Month in Salt Lake City. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE.   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE. D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)   E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   G.CONSENT: 1. Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act Public Hearing for Sky Harbour Hangar Development The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment on the Sky Harbour hangar development on the east side of the Salt Lake City International Airport that consists of the development of an aircraft storage facility situated on 8.4 acres and will include four box hangars. The project would be funded through a tax-exempt private activity bond (PAB) issued by the Public Finance Authority of Wisconsin. The development entails no financial liability for Salt Lake City, but Federal regulations for tax-exempt PABs require the Council to hold what is known as a TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) public hearing on this proposal. No other Council action is required.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.3 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will set the date for Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes three grants. The first grant would fund license plate reader cameras on major roads to enhance public safety and reduce crime. The second grant would fund the removal of hazardous vegetation from the Jordan River riverbed, banks, and canopy. The third grant would fund expenses relating to homeless shelters, including salary and benefits for existing police officers to maintain public safety in areas surrounding shelters. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3. Resolution: Valley Behavioral Health Public Benefit Analysis The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider authorizing the release of Salt Lake City’s reversionary interest in the property currently owned by Valley Behavioral Health at 107 South 800 West. The release would allow for the development of Saltair Lofts, a 68-unit permanent supportive housing project. It would also be executed in exchange for a 50 year Restrictive Use Agreement preserving certain public benefits most notably, including helping to ensure all units are affordable permanent supportive housing for formerly homeless individuals.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4. Board Appointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board – Parviz Faiz The Council will consider approving the appointment of Parviz Faiz, resident of District 3, to the Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   H.ADJOURNMENT:     CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 20, 2025, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, July 8, 2025. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Allison Parks – Deputy City Attorney, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Nick Norris – Planning Director, Tammy Hunsaker – Deputy Director of Community Services, Michael Sanders – Budget & Policy Analyst, Hannah Vickery – Senior City Attorney, Kate Werrett – Budget & Policy Analyst, Bill Manzanares – Deputy Chief of Police, Kat Andra – Public Lands Senior Planning Strategist The meeting was called to order at 4:37 p.m.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 1 Work Session Items   1.Ordinance: Mixed-Use (MU) Zoning Consolidation Zoning Text and Map Amendment Follow-up ~ 3:45 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing on a proposal that would amend the City's zoning ordinance and zoning map by consolidating up to 27 existing commercial, form- based, and mixed-use zoning districts into six new mixed-use (MU) districts. The proposal aims to simplify zoning regulations, improve clarity of language, and incorporate missing design standards. The new mixed-use districts will be similar to the current districts but will have changes to setbacks, building height, lot coverage, and permitted land uses. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCMixedUse. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2025; Tuesday, April 8, 2025; Tuesday, April 15, 2025; Tuesday, July 1, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 and Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025     Summary: Nick Tarbet and Nick Norris presented the proposed ordinance, discussed landmark setback and stepback requirements, zoning variance process, incentives for qualifying historic buildings, and how they might apply to contributing structures in historic districts that were not designated historic landmarks, reviewing and potentially modifying standards for new construction and additions within overlay zones to better address those properties. Council Member Mano revisited the Planning Commission’s recommendation required stepbacks for properties on streets less than 90 feet wide and expressed concern about its impact on many District 5 properties, recommended aligning stepback requirements with areas that allow additional height, specifically within the boundary from McClelland Street to 2100 South and the freeway, and discussed the possibility of delayed implementation if the ordinance is adopted, to give residents time to understand the upcoming changes. Council Requests: Council Member Wharton requested a text amendment to allow contributing structures within historic districts to be evaluated as historic landmark sites for the purposes of setback and stepback zoning requirements. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 2 Council Member Mano proposed revised language for the stepback requirements and requested a three-month implementation period to allow the parameters to take effect, enabling property owners to begin applying as soon as possible.   2.Ordinance: Amendment of Chapter 11.14 Parties, Gatherings, or Events ~ 4:00 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend Chapter 11.14 of the Salt Lake City Code to establish an administrative process and civil fine in the event of large, unruly gatherings on private property that include illegal activity and disturbances. The proposal would establish a civil enforcement remedy for the City to replace the recently eliminated service fee associated with police officers responding to such calls for service. A companion ordinance will be transmitted and will establish the appeals process for any of these citations. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 12, 2025     Summary: Michael Sanders and Bill Manzanares presented the item and discussed the definitions of mass events compared to small parties, public safety during unofficial college gatherings, additional safety measures for permitted mass gatherings, problems identifying property owners responsible for mass house parties or non-permitted events, the possibility of authorizing civilian enforcement officers to respond to event violation reports, and the public event permitting process. Jill Love, Lehua Weaver, and Hannah Vickery discussed gatherings on private property, stating those did not require filing permits with the city, and clarified the proposed amendments intended to address community concerns related to private house parties that became a continuous public nuisance, not to expand enforcement or deputize civilian enforcement employees. Council Member Petro exercised a moment of personal privilege to introduce a student visitor, Pia Picoli, who attended the meeting to shadow Council Members. Council Requests: Council Members requested a report on the need to deputize civilian response teams and sworn police officers, expand the civilian response team to handle violation calls, and assess the potential impact on the community. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 3   3.Resolutions: Policies for Housing Program Funds Follow- up ~ 4:20 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing on four proposed resolutions that would establish legislative policies for housing activities including: Housing Program Funds, the Home Repair Program, the Community Land Trust Program, and the Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) Preservation Program. If adopted, the legislative policies will establish the standards and processes for allocating funding through the City’s budget and in some cases, to program recipients. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 12, 2025     Summary: Tammy Hunsaker presented the item, reviewed the annual program budget processes, and discussed with the Council the purposes of the Home Repair, Community Land Trust, and Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) Preservation Programs, single-homeowner applicants compared to multi-property owners, and the inclusion of deed restrictions in property acquisitions to preserve long-term affordability. Straw Poll: Support for using available funding made from NOAH for property acquisitions and to prioritize smaller properties and smaller non-institutional property owners. Support was unanimous. Council Requests: Council Member Petro requested a cost analysis comparing Community Land Trust loans managed solely by Salt Lake City to the potential costs and benefits of partnering with an outside organization. Tammy Hunsaker confirmed the department would include this in the Fiscal Year 2026 Legislative Intent. Council Member Mano and Dugan requested an analysis and recommendation from CAN on determining whether individuals or LLC’s cannot take part in the program based on the number of properties already owned. Tammy Hunkaser confirmed she could provide the Council with a recommendation.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 4 4.Council Policy Manual: Communication Budget Discussion Follow-up ~ 4:35 p.m.  30 min. The Council will hold a follow-up discussion about the Communication Budget section of the Council Policy Manual and discuss options for how to update the policy. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 15, 2025; Tuesday, May 13, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Written briefing only, no discussion was held.   5.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Follow-Up ~ 5:05 p.m.  45 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26CIP. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025; Tuesday, July 1, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025     Summary: Kate Werrett presented the follow-up to the Council and discussed the following items: •Item #18 – GREENbike Federal Grant Match for 2026 and Bike Rack Replacements 2026, Jon Larsen stated that a comprehensive list of bike rack locations was available for reference to help confirm that the installation of rack locations was cohesive •Item #19 – Livable Streets Program funding needs and definitions •Item #41 – Glendale Traffic Calming Safety requests in comparison to Livable Streets requests •Item #20 – Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk, and other curb replacement requests, and the need to address recurring infrastructure needs. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 5 •Item #21 – Pedestrian Safety/HAWK at Richmond St. and Zenith Ave funding approval. •Item #22 – Three Sport Court Replacements ◦ Kat Andra clarified that funding would only cover the complete replacement of the West Pointe Basketball Court and that the Liberty Park courts had a partnership with an outside organization that could possibly fund the needed replacement •Item #23 – Playground Replacements ◦Kat Andra stated their current process for choosing projects used Cartography data collected from Public Lands, which could be shared with the Council •Item #25- East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal ◦Council Member Lopez Chavez reminded the Council that this CIP request was in its eighth year of applying for funding •Item #27 – Nevada Street Reconstruction Council Requests: Council Member Young requested a review of Item #18 – GREENbike rack installation locations in comparison to other CIP requests for additional bike racks, to ensure that all bike rack CIP requests could be addressed with one funding allowance, as well as a breakdown of the funding costs for planning, design, etc, for Item #27 – Nevada Street Reconstruction. Council Member Petro requested documentation on what constitutes livable streets, complete streets, regular street maintenance, and the Vision Zero plan regarding Item #19, and a review of the HAWK light information and data at Zenith Avenue related to Item #21. Council Member Puy requested a review of the supporting data for Items #19 – Livable Streets Programs, and Item #41 – Glendale Traffic Calming, to ensure that funding was being used effectively to address safety concerns in both CIP requests and project phases. Council Member Dugan requested that Curtis Park be reviewed for recommended funding for Item #23 – Playground Replacements. Council Member Lopez Chavez requested that Items #20 – Curb Replacements and Item #25 – East Central Community Council Median Restoration Project be reviewed together to ensure these continuous requests are addressed and possibly consolidated into deferred maintenance funds, emphasizing the importance of restoring the curbs and protecting the green space.   6.Board Appointment: Library Board – Sarah Vaughn ~ 5:50 p.m.  5 min.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 6 The Council will interview Sarah Vaughn prior to considering appointment to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025   Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the evening's Formal Meeting Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   7.Board Appointment: Library Board – Margaret Neville ~ 5:55 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Margaret Neville prior to considering appointment to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025     Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the evening's Formal Meeting Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   8.Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Solomon Brumbaugh ~ 6:00 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Solomon Brumbaugh prior to considering appointment to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 25, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 7 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025   Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Wharton stated their name would be on the evening's Formal Meeting Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   Standing Items   9.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    There was no report from the Chair or Vice Chair.   10.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: •MPACT Conference; and •Scheduling Items.    Summary: Lehua Weaver stated that registration was open for the Impact Transit and Community Conference, a pre-approved convention outlined in the Council Policy Manual, and confirmed that the conference falls within the timeframe during which Council Members up for election should not be traveling.   11.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 8 transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to enter into Closed Session for the purposes of: d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, disposition, or lease of real property, and attorney-client matters. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to exit Closed Session. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Closed Session started at 6:40 PM Directors in attendance: Dugan, Mano, Wharton, Puy, Young, Petro, Lopez Chavez. Staff in attendance: Laura Briefer Jesse Stewart Lisa Tarufelli Jason Brown Karryn Greenleaf Carly Castle MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 9 Austin Kimmel Tammy Hunsaker Mary Beth Thompson Lehua Weaver Michael Sander Allison Parks Mark Kittrell Rachel Otto Lindsey Nikola Megan Yuill Kate Werrett Nick Tarbet Danny Walz Jennifer Bruno Cindy Lou Trishman Keith Reynolds Matthew Brown Closed Session ended at 6:58     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 10 Meeting adjourned at 6:58 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, July 8, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 11 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, September 2, 2025.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative Leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff  Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott –  Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Brian Fullmer –  Public Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant  The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Darin Mano will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of April 1, 2025, and May 20, 2025. Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the April 1, 2025, and May 20, 2025 work session meeting minutes. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing September as National Suicide Prevention Month in Salt Lake City. Summary: Council Member Mano read the resolution.  Alyssa Burnham (Salt Lake County Health Department Suicide Prevention Coordinator) and Emma Blake (Salt Lake County Health Department Suicide Prevention Health Educator) thanked the city for recognizing September as National Suicide Prevention Month in Salt Lake City and reminded the public about the resources available, highlighting the 988 hotline for mental health help.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt the Joint Ceremonial Resolution 27 of 2025, recognizing September as National Suicide Prevention Month in Salt Lake City. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 – B7 will be heard as one public hearing.   1. Grant Application: Regional Athletic Complex – Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention, and Airport Facilities Tax Act The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Lands to Salt Lake County. If awarded, the grant would fund the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 2 full build out of the Regional Athletic Complex (RAC) to add extra fields and infrastructure in order to host larger-scale tournaments.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item B6 for minute summary and motion.   2. Grant Application: Civic Center District / Green Loop – Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention, and Airport Facilities Tax Act The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Lands to Salt Lake County. If awarded, the grant would fund design documents for a network of Civic Center District public spaces, transportation needs and the Downtown neighborhood.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item B6 for minute summary and motion.   3. Grant Application: Jordan River Trail – Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention, and Airport Facilities Tax Act The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Lands to Salt Lake County. If awarded, the grant would fund the Jordan River Trail project consultant fees for interpretive programming development, MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 3 materials, design, and engineering services.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item B6 for minute summary and motion.   4. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2025 Safer Outcomes: Enhancing De- Escalation and Crisis Response Training for Law Enforcement The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. If awarded, the grant would fund training programs to build and maintain officers’ de-escalation proficiency including the purchase of a virtual reality (VR) simulator, setup and training, FEMA ICAT Train the Trainer and attendance at conferences, overtime for staff providing and receiving training, and local and department training in de-escalation and crisis response.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item B6 for minute summary and motion.   5. Grant Application: River & Roots: Memory, Place, and the Jordan River The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Mayor’s Office to 2892 Miles to Go. If awarded, the grant would fund participant compensation, MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 4 audio/video support, and project expenses/supplies for the River & Roots: Memory, Place, and the Jordan River community storytelling and environmental engagement project for Westside youth.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item B6 for minute summary and motion.   6. Grant Application: Juvenile Fire Setter Prevention Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Fire Department to FEMA. If awarded, the grant would fund the creation of a Task Force to intervene with youth who show fire-setting tendencies. The grant will also provide travel and educational materials for National Fire Academy accreditation, outreach material, leased or purchased assessment software, and consultation with specialists.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   Summary for Public Hearing Items B1-B6: Sylvia Richards gave a brief introduction of the grant items.  There were no public comments.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 5 Close the public hearing and refer Items B1 – B6 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 7. Grant Application: Community Engagement Academy Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Mayor’s Office to The National League of Cities (NLC). If awarded, the grant would fund direct technical assistance from the NLC, in creating more effective public outreach; workshops to learn from other municipalities; and in-person workshops in Washington DC.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   Summary: Council Member Mano stated Item B7 did not receive funding and was pulled from the agenda.    8. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 247 North 800 West The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning for the properties at approximately 247 North 800 West from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential). The proposal would enable development to the west of the existing single-family home. Any new development will be accessed from Hoyt Place, which is a private road. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petitioner: Bert Holland, representing the property owner. Petition No.:PLNPCM2024-00629.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 12, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 6 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Summary: Council Member Lopez Chavez joined online during this item. Brian Fullmer gave a brief introduction.  Public Comments: Leland Stephens expressed concern that the zoning amendment would increase traffic and parking needs, given the already limited parking around the West High School neighborhood.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to close the public hearing and refer action to a future council meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 9. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Approximately 373 West American Avenue The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley situated adjacent to properties located at approximately 373 West American Avenue.  The proposal would close the alley to public use and allow the property owner of three of the four adjacent properties to potentially redevelop this site (the other adjacent property owner also supports the alley vacation.) The alley cannot be used as a mid-block connection because the 900 South viaduct is directly to the south. Located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Jarod Hall. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023- 00636.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 7, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 7 Summary: Brian Fullmer gave a brief introduction.  There was no public comment.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Petro to close the public hearing and refer to a future council meeting for action. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 10. Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment Public Lands (PL) and Street Vacation - West High School The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting the proposed Text Amendment and Street Vacation ordinances at approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School.  The proposed changes include:  •Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. This would apply to all PL zoning districts. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District.  Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00320. •Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00321.  For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/2fdcpe2z.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Summary: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8 Nick Tarbet gave a brief introduction.  Public Comments: Alex Dulwick expressed concern about the expansion, citing the Capitol Hill Master Plan, which prohibits public institutions from expanding into the surrounding neighborhood, and requested that the Council deny the two ordinances.  Colin Kingsbury spoke in support of rebuilding West High School, requested the preservation of the historic building, and expressed concern that the new parking entrances would exacerbate congestion in residential areas.  Krista Nabaum supported the rebuild while stating concern about the location of the proposed building plans' new entrances, citing that student and faculty safety was at risk due to drug and homelessness issues in the neighborhood.  Council Remarks: Council Member Puy stated that the West High School rebuild was a complex proposal, noting that the council did not control the school district’s building design, which necessitated further discussion to address community concerns before the Council took action.  Council Member Wharton thanked the public for their input and encouraged further engagement with the Salt Lake School District and the Council to voice community concerns and propose ideas for the school's rebuild.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to Close the public hearing and defer action to a future council meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 11. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment for the Delta Center Parking Garage at Approximately 301 West South Temple The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a Master Development Agreement for the construction of the Delta Center parking garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. The proposal includes the construction of a seven-story parking garage with approximately 452 parking stalls at the southwest corner of the site, which is intended to provide parking for patrons of the Delta Center Arena and improve the site's functionality. The applicant is requesting approval of the development agreement associated with the project, which establishes specific rules for constructing the parking garage at the Delta Center Arena. If approved, the proposed development agreement could supersede several of the City's rules and regulations. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jazz Arena Investors LLC. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00619. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 9 For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/DeltaCenterParking.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Summary: Nick Tarbet gave a brief introduction.  Public Comments: Emily Sloan-Pace spoke against the proposed Delta Center Design and Master Development Agreement terms, stating concern about the agreement's inability to activate the surrounding areas, coupled with the Developers' disregard for urban planning.   Stephen Otterstrom spoke against the ordinance, expressing concern over the agreement's terms and urged the City to review and request additional activation in the development agreement with Smith Entertainment Group to ensure that public benefits were a priority of Salt Lake City.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer action to a future council meeting for action. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE.   D.COMMENTS: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 10 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no comments to the Mayor from the Council.   2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Scott Johnson spoke on the Downtown Sports District, expressed concern over the implemented tax increases, and requested information regarding public funds used by City Council Members for public transparency.  Jason Ehrhart was called to speak, but was no longer present. Tamra Burton expressed concern that the newly implemented sewer rate structure had adverse effects on the community and did not accurately reflect the sewer system usage, citing a recent bill for a single property that had increased by 2,639%, resulting in the monthly bill balance rising from a few hundred dollars to several thousand, and requested that the rate structure be reviewed.      E.NEW BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Public Utilities Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 2025B and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2025C The Council will consider adopting a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of up to $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bond anticipation notes, Series 2025B, and up $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue refunding bond, Series 2025C. The notes will finance the acquisition, construction, remodeling, and improvement of a campus for Public Utilities. The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the currently outstanding Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2017. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 28 of 2025, Public Utilities Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 2025B and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2025C parameters, and refer to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 11 the consent agenda for setting the date for a public hearing on the bond issuance for October 7, 2025. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Building Permit Fee Waivers for Alliance House and First Step House The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would approve a request for building permit fee waivers from two non-profit developers, Alliance House and First Step House, for two new deeply affordable housing projects. Alliance House, Inc., intends to develop 16 one-bedroom housing units at approximately 1805 South Main Street to serve households at or below 30% AMI. First Step House intends to develop 67 one- and two- bedroom housing units at approximately 44 North 1000 West for households at or below 40% AMI. Approval of these waivers was recommended by the Community and Neighborhood (CAN) Department.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt Resolution 29 of 2025, Building Permit Fee Waivers for Alliance House and First Step House. . AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Council Remarks: Council Member Mano thanked the two organizations for their dedication, support, and services provided to the community.    2. Ordinance: Amending the Annual Compensation Plan for All Non- Represented Employees Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the Fiscal Year 2025- 26 Annual Compensation Plan for all non-represented employees.The Administration’s proposal includes several amendments which include policy updates to improve operational efficiency and employee retention. Additionally, corrections related to City retirement contributions are also included. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 12   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 53 of 2025, amending the annual compensation plan for all non-represented employees for the fiscal year 2025-26.. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Changes to Zoning Incentives for Building Preservation/Adaptive Reuse The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to Building Preservation Incentives/Adaptive Reuse. The proposal would expand the types of modifications that can be reviewed administratively through the Design Review and Planned Development process, clarifies design standards for new construction, and introduces the option for applicants to request a one-year time extension of preliminary approval. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00039.   2. Resolution: Public Utilities Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 2025B and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2025C The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment on a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of up to $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bond anticipation notes, Series 2025B, and up $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue refunding bond, Series 2025C. The notes will finance the acquisition, construction, remodeling, and improvement of a campus for Public Utilities. The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the currently outstanding Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2017.    3. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 September 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 13 City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes items which relate to the Main Street fire on August 11, 2025, including funding for an emergency loan fund program, rental assistance, and funding for barriers to allow safe pedestrian passage in front of the buildings burned in the recent fire.  For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   4. Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.1) for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.1) for Fiscal Year 2025-26.    5. Board Appointment: Public Utilities Advisory Committee – Sean McKelvie The Council will consider approving the appointment of Sean McKelvie, resident of Salt Lake County, to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee for a term ending January 15, 2029.    6. Board Appointment: Public Utilities Advisory Committee – Kamiron Anderson The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kamiron Anderson, resident of District 1, to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee for a term ending January 15, 2029.    7. Board Reappointment: Planning Commission – Aimee Burrows The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Aimee Burrows, resident of District 6, to the Planning Commission for a term ending September 2, 2029.   8. Board Reappointment: Historic Landmark Commission – Carlton Getz The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Carlton Getz, resident of District 3, to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending September 2, 2029. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 14 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 15   9. Board Reappointment: Historic Landmark Commission – Michael Abrahamson The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Michael Abrahamson, resident of District 2, to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending September 2, 2029. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 16   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the Consent Agenda. . AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT:       MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 17 Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon Approval] _______________________________  City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________  City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.    This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, September 2, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 18 JOINT RESOLUTION DECLARING NOVEMBER 2025 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH IN SALT LAKE CITY WHEREAS,Salt Lake City stands on the ancestral homelands of many indigenous nations, including the Ute (all bands); Paiute, Goshute, Dine’/Navajo; Shoshoni; Arapaho; Oglala Sioux; Cheyenne River Sioux; Wind River Shoshone; Cherokee; or Rosebud Sioux tribes and their respective bands, whose members have lived, stewarded, and cared for the Salt Lake Valley and the Wasatch Range for millennia; and WHEREAS,the Native American community residing within Salt Lake City contribute to the vibrant character of the city through celebrations, heritage, and achievement; and WHEREAS,Native Americans offer invaluable contributions and play an essential role in the economic, cultural, and social development of Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS,we recognize and honor Indigenous peoples whose legacy and ongoing contributions continue to shape and enhance the city; and WHEREAS,the City remains committed to fostering meaningful dialogue, improving services, and building partnerships with Native American residents, and promoting justice, equity, mutual respect, and shared prosperity for all. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Salt Lake City Council and the Mayor of Salt Lake City hereby declare the month of November 2025 as Native American Heritage Month in recognition of the enduring presence, contributions, and legacy of Native American communities. Adopted this 25 day of November 2025. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/12/2025 Date Sent to Council: 11/13/2025 From: Department * Airport Employee Name: Butler, Brian E-mail Brian.Butler@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 11/13/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 11/13/2025 Subject: TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) public hearing for Sky Harbour Hanger Development at SLC Additional Staff Contact: bill.wyatt@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Eric Stolpman estolpman@skyharbour.group Document Type Information Item Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on December 9th, 2025 Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process The TEFRA hearing allows for public comment This page has intentionally been left blank Background: SLC Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary of Sky Harbour is requesting that the City hold a public hearing so that the Mayor may sign a public approval certificate for SLC Development LLC to receive bond proceeds on a tax exempt basis to (a) finance the costs of an 8.4 acre lot to build four 43k sq ft hangers, office, lounge, parking, apron, ground support equipment, as well as fueling facilities. The City will not issue the bonds or assume any financial liability; rather, the bonds will be issued by the Public Finance Authority, a commission organized under and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 66.0301, 66.0303 and 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes in one or more series, in an amount not to exceed $95,000,000. The public hearing for this types of bonds is required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The request for the public hearing is a requirement of private activity bonds and is a procedural action that must be taken by the developer/issuer to comply with IRS regulations. A TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) hearing allows interested members of the public to express their views regarding the issuance of the bonds for a certain project. Project Overview: The Sky Harbour development on the east side of Salt Lake City International Airport will consist of a development situated on 8.4 acres and will include 4 box hangers including lounge and office space that will be 172k sq ft, 70k sq ft of vehicle driving and parking, 3k sq ft of ground support equipment and support facilities, as well as fueling operations that will all be Leed certified. Sky Harbour will construct all the facilities on a 50 year lease and pay to the airport directly ground lease payments as well as fuel flowage fees. The total cost of the development is for up to $95 million dollars. At the conclusion of the lease term, the facilities will revert to the Salt Lake City International Airport which can be used to lease to hanger tenants. Community Benefits: Sky Harbour is looking to construct and build four large hangers that can be used by any tenant wishing to lease hanger space at the Salt Lake City International Airport. These will be state of the air facilities that will attract tenants of all sizes. In addition, the company will make direct payments to the Salt Lake City International Airport in the form of ground rent as well as fuel flowage fees. It will generate property taxes, aircraft ad valorem, county fuel taxes, and new air sales and use taxes. In addition, Sky Harbour offers four primary benefits to the SLC International Airport and the local community. 1. Significant economic development through direct payments, associated tax revenues and job growth 2. Reduced congestion, noise and environmental impact. The average noise footprint of a Sky Harbour Campus is 2 to 4 db lower than that of a total based fleet 3. Focused environmental, social, and governance and diversity equity and inclusion through direct employment opportunities and vendor relationships. Hundreds of new jobs will be created. 4. No disruption to other airport businesses This page has intentionally been left blank This page has intentionally been left blank 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2025 Sky Harbour Proprietary SKYH NYSE Investor Presentation Summer 2025 Salt Lake City International Airport Community Benefits November 2025 SKYH NYSE 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 •Sky Harbour (NYSE: SKYH) develops and manages modern aviation infrastructure at airports across the U.S. •A Sky Harbour campus offers four primary benefits to airport sponsors and communities 1.Significant economic development through direct payments, associated tax revenues, and job growth 2.Reduced congestion, noise, and environmental impact 3.Focused ESG and DE&I contribution through direct employment opportunities and vendor relationships 4.No disruption to other airport businesses •Sky Harbour ’s development at SLC consists of 1.(~8.4 acres, incl. 4 box hangars): 172K SF of hangar, office, lounge; 207K SF of apron; ~70K SF of vehicle drive and parking 1 Executive Summary 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 SLC Development LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and subsidiary of Sky Harbour Group Corporation, is requesting that the City hold a public hearing so that the Mayor may sign a public approval certificate for SLC Development LLC to receive bond proceeds to (a) finance the costs of the development, construction and/or equipping of an 8.4 acre Business Aviation hangar development located at Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC). The City will not issue the bonds or assume any financial liability; rather, the bonds will be issued by the Public Finance Authority, a commission organized under and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 66.0301, 66.0303 and 66.0304 of the Wisconsin Statutes in one or more series, in an amount not to exceed $95,000,000. The public hearing for this types of bonds is required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The request for the public hearing is a requirement of private activity bonds and is a procedural action that must be taken by the developer/issuer to comply with IRS regulations. A TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) hearing allows interested members of the public to express their views regarding the issuance of the bonds for a certain project. 2 Background Description & Financing Requirements 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 Re-Introducing Sky Harbour 3 The Best Home Basing Solution in aviation – Bar None Not an FBO – rather a completely new operating concept with unique benefits to airports Built to Last / Here to Stay •Publicly Traded (NYSE: SKYH) •Well-Capitalized Active Issuer of Public Bonds Our Product Our Team Culturally and Professionally Diverse •Experienced Airport Operators (30+ airport projects) •Military Aviators •Top Real Estate Professionals •Finance Industry Veterans 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 Sky Harbour Home Basing Operator •Direct Revenues via Ground Rent and Fuel Flowage •Indirect Revenues via Aircraft Ad Valorem, Fuel & A/C Sales tax, and Leasehold Improvement Taxes •Significant Capital Investment in airport infrastructure (hangar, apron, vehicle) •Estimated hundreds of jobs created or preserved •State of the Art Product, LEED design •Positioning for EVTOL pioneering •Robust ESG and DE&I initiatives Note:Additionally, a Sky Harbour campus would have limited impact on airport traffic –applies to landside vehicular and taxiway congestion. 4 Benefit Overview of Sky Harbour Sky Harbour is a proven developer delivering economic value to airport sponsors 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary SLC Development Site Plan 5 Key Details •~8.4 acre plot •4, 43K sqft Private SH-37 Hangars •Office/lounge, storage, and indoor vehicle parking •+200k sqft of apron and managed ramp •+70k sqft parking stalls •~3K sqft of GSE and support facilities •Fuel farm 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary Economic Development: Direct & Indirect Revenues Economic Impact Drivers Direct Payments to SLC •Ground Rent •Aviation Fuel Flowage Other Tax Revenues and Fees •Property Tax, Aircraft Ad Valorem •County Fuel Sales Tax •Property Taxes: Possessory & Leasehold Interest •New Aircraft Sales and Use Taxes 6 Significant expected total direct revenues to the citizens of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary Economic Development: Jobs Sky Harbour preserves or create hundreds of jobs in the local communities Typical Sky Harbour Employment EMPLOYMENT IN DEVELOPMENT •Construction (e.g., GCs, Trades) •Construction Support (e.g., Architects, Engineers) •Associated Development (e.g., Finance, Legal) IN OPERATION •Sky Harbour Employees •Tenant Direct Employment •Aircraft Business Services •Non-Aviation Business Services SKY HARBOUR ACADEMY •Ground Handler, Fueler, and other aviation jobs Hundreds of local jobs on avg. ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary 7 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary Noise Reduction Typical Sky Harbour tenants operate late model business jets that emit less noise than other based aircraft Category Aircraft Year db Midsize Citation XLS 1996 82.9 Super Midsize Citation XLS 1996 72.3 Large Falcon 2000S/EX 2003 79.4 Large Long Range Gulfstream G550 2003 80.3 Super Midsize Citation Sovereign 2004 72.4 Large Long Range Falcon 7x 2005 79.8 Midsize Gulfstream 150 2006 81.4 Large Embraer Legacy 650 2011 77.9 Large Long Range Global 6000 2012 82.7 Super Midsize Challenger 350 2013 75.3 Large Falcon 2000LXS/EX 2014 79.4 Large Gulfstream 500 2014 80.3 Sky Harbour Campus Average 78.68 Illustrative Based Tenant Average 80.56 - 82.68 Source: OEM & FAA Noise Certifications on Take-Off/ Lateral and JETNET data for Base Tenants Illustrative Sky Harbour Campus The average noise footprint of a Sky Harbour campus is 2 to 4 db lower than that of the total based fleet All based-tenant campuses affords the opportunity to encourage our tenants to adhere to airport noise abatement regulations: Quieter Nights Programs Quiet Jet Departure Programs Full Runway Length Departures Maintenance Runup Hours Adherence Limited Use of Reverse Thrust (when safely able) Preferential runway usage (when applicable) 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ESG & DEI Sky Harbour is preparing to lead infrastructure development alongside emerging Electric Aircraft and Air Mobility operators… 9 Sustainable power generation1 Scalable power storage2 Efficient power transmission3 Sky Harbour EVTOL Charging Model …and is compatible with emerging electric aviation leaders 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary Corporate Social Responsibility Each Sky Harbour campus features the Sky Harbour Academy training program Paid training for a lifelong career in the high-paying aviation industry; Hundreds of jobs for the local community 10 •Sky Harbour Academy recruits members of disadvantaged and underrepresented communities with an interest in aviation. •Sky Harbour provides full training and certification as line service technicians and CSRs. •All expenses are paid, including certification fees and personal study stipends. •Assistance with placement in high-paying aviation jobs, including with Sky Harbour at an average salary rate of ~$50K-$65K ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary ~300-500 trained individuals ready for a career in aviation industry Potential Partner Organizations Ground Operator Training at SGR airport … Plus Community Colleges and Technical Schools that with Aviation programs 239 61 41 0 0 0 140 140 140 178 178 178 167 191 219 222 222 222 ©2021 Sky Harbour Confidential and Proprietary 11 Benefits for Many Stakeholders Salt Lake City International Airport •Accelerated and coordinated airfield infrastructure development •Optimize bandwidth for other initiatives •Direct and indirect revenue •New State-of-the-Art Aviation Assets Citizens of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County •Significant Private investment in airport infrastructure •Strong Economic growth •Hundreds of jobs created or preserved Airport Tenants •Efficient land planning and availability for multiple tenant types (e.g., Corporate Hangar, MRO) •Increased Business Aviation footprint 1 2 3 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/18/2025 Date Sent to Council: 11/18/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 11/18/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 11/18/2025 Subject: FY26 Budget Amendment #3 Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $0.00 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in the grants fund only, with a total revenue increase of $4,139,705 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $4,139,705. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: November 18, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #3 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE MISC GRANTS FUND $4,139,704.89 $4,139,704.89 TOTAL $4,139,704.89 $4,139,704.89 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2026. Based on revenue data across the first part of the fiscal year, it is projected that revenues will be realized at approximately $694,500 beyond the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. Revenue FY26 Annual Budget FY26 Amended Budget Projection Amended Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) Property Taxes 148,580,334 148,580,334 148,580,334 - Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 126,026,000 126,026,000 125,326,000 (700,000) Franchise Taxes 17,220,000 17,220,000 17,220,000 - Total Taxes 291,826,334 291,826,334 291,126,334 (700,000) Charges For Services 6,821,820 6,821,820 6,845,951 24,131 Fines & Forfeitures 3,085,827 3,085,827 3,093,198 7,371 Interest Income 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 - Interfund Service Charges 34,569,169 34,569,169 34,569,169 - Intergovernmental Revenue 6,205,000 6,205,000 6,205,000 - Licenses 21,847,694 21,847,694 21,935,228 87,534 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,838,663 3,838,663 4,542,078 703,415 Parking Meter Revenue 3,273,255 3,273,255 3,315,208 41,953 Parking Tickets 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 - Permits 18,981,859 18,981,859 19,493,610 511,751 Property Sale Proceeds - - 17,906 17,906 Gain on Property Dispositions - - 272 272 Rental & Other Income 1,201,460 1,201,460 1,201,623 163 Operating Transfers In 24,780,192 24,780,192 24,780,192 - Total W/O Special Tax 135,804,939 135,804,939 137,199,435 1,394,496 Sales Tax Addition 1/2%58,000,000 58,000,000 58,000,000 - Total General Fund 485,631,273 485,631,273 486,325,769 694,496 The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. No General Fund expenses have been proposed in Budget Amendment #3, so the fund balance percentage will remain the same. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #3, the available fund balance will remain at 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 14,931,953$ 78,854,192$ 93,786,145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%25.42%17.38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57%29.74%30.99%25.42%17.38%18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (27,392,780) (27,392,780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (358,000) (358,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) (913,000) (913,000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) - - BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 50,190,412 65,122,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32%18.82%19.52%25.42%11.06%12.71% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,721,525 512,471,524 FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $0.00 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in one (1) fund, with a total revenue increase of $4,139,705 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $4,139,705. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Third amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2025. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2025. Published Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form ____________________ Jaysen Oldroyd This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Misc Grants 224,000.00 224,000.00 One-time - 2 Jordan River Water Trail River Restoration & Recreation Project Misc Grants 666,000.00 666,000.00 One-time - 3 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY 2026 Misc Grants 3,249,704.89 3,249,704.89 One-time - Consent Agenda Total of Budget Amendment Items 4,139,704.89 4,139,704.89 0.00 0.00 - Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #3: General Fund GF 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 4,139,704.89 4,139,704.89 0.00 0.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 4,139,704.89 4,139,704.89 0.00 0.00 - Administration Proposed Council Approved Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section I: Council Added Items Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 53,881,754.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 27,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 - 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 43,102,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 20,344,394.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 4,139,704.89 - - 2,252,839,719.72 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952 358,000.00 913,000.00 465,630,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 64,514,224.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 100,000.00 477,054,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 36,937,750.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 45,504,229.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 38,707,891.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 27,527,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 20,344,394.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 358,000.00 137,008,677.94 4,139,704.89 - - 2,053,964,514.20 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 4 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: COPS Technology and Equipment Program Misc Grants One-time $224,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By Amy Dorsey and Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard and Shellie Dietrich The Davis County Sheriff's Department has applied for and received a COPS grant from the Department of Justice. The department received $1.5 million of which they are sub-awarding $659,000 to Salt Lake County, $165,000 to Tooele County and $224,000 to Salt Lake City to reimburse $224,000 for the purchase of equipment. Specifically, the grant will pay for license plate reader cameras which will be posted on traffic light poles at major intersections of ingress and egress to and from the City, like Beck Street on the North side of the City. E-2: Jordan River Water Trail River Restoration & Recreation Project Misc Grants One-time $666,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Amy Dorsey and Tyler Fonarow For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Tyler Fonarow and Gregg Evans This grant helps fund the removal of hazardous vegetation from the Jordan River's riverbed, banks and canopy, ensuring a safe, navigable waterway while improving habitat quality. The first phase, completed between 2022 -2024, focused on a full sweep of the riverbed, removing decades worth of dead and downed trees. Following completion of this phase of the project, canoes and kayaks are now able to navigate the full length of Salt Lake City’s portion of the river without needing to navigate through obstacles. The current phase will address riverbanks and tree canopy management, with the goal of reducing hazards from unstable trees and preventing organic debris from entering the river. Public Lands is using $135,000 of operational funds as a required match. These funds will be used to employ a contractor to do the required work. E-3: Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant FY 2026 Misc Grants One-time $3,249,704.89 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey and Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard and Shellie Dietrich The City was awarded funds from an annual formula driven grant which the state provides for homeless shelter mitigation. The City has received this grant each year since FY 2020. The state allocates funding each year to local governments with homeless shelters within their boundaries. The grant provides financial assistance to help cover the expenses related to providing shelter for the unhoused. The total of this award is $3,249,704.89, an amount determined by an allocation formula outlined in Utah State Code and will primarily cover the ongoing personnel costs of 15 SLCPD officers, 3 SLCPD Sergeants, and 1 SLCPD Lieutenant. In addition, the grant will cover overtime and personnel costs for winter overflow shelter response approximately 7,000 hours. In past years, the grant provided funding for the Homeless Engagement and Response Team (HEART), as well as subawards to the Downtown Alliance and Volunteers of America (VOA), in addition to Police staff and equipment. This will be the first year the grant will solely fund Police personnel. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #3 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2,788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1,018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 $777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/21/2025 Date Sent to Council: 11/24/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Logan Hunt E-mail Logan.Hunt@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 11/21/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 11/24/2025 Subject: Valley Behavioral Health PBA Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: See attached PDF. Background/Discussion See attached PDF. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: Date Sent to Council: Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 11/18/25 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Tammy Hunsaker, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) SUBJECT: Public Benefits Analysis for the release of Salt Lake City’s reversionary interest on a property currently owned by Valley Behavioral Health located at 107 South 800 West (“Property”) in exchange for a Restrictive Use Agreement recorded on the Property preserving certain public benefits detailed in the attached Term Sheet, including helping ensure all 68 units are affordable permanent supportive housing for formerly homeless individuals. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Akerlow, Deputy Director 801-244-1070 Mike.akerlow@slc.gov Logan Hunt, Real Estate Services Director, 801-634-9054 logan.hunt@slc.gov DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of the attached resolution authorizing the release of the Salt Lake City’s reversionary interest in the Property as established in the 1992 Quit Claim Deed to allow for the development of Saltair Lofts, a 68-unit permanent supportive housing project. The release will be executed in exchange for a Restrictive Use Agreement preserving certain public benefits detailed in the attached Term Sheet, including helping ensure all 68 units are affordable permanent supportive housing for formerly homeless individuals. BUDGET IMPACT: No change to the adopted budget. The City will forgo $2,400,000 in revenue associated with the reversionary interest in exchange for the long-term public benefits secured through the Restrictive Use Agreement. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Property, located at 107 South 800 West, was originally conveyed by Salt Lake City to Valley Behavioral Health (“Valley”) through a Quit Claim Deed in 1992 containing a reversionary interest in favor of the City. Valley subsequently developed the site as an eight-unit affordable housing project that has been in continuous use since construction in 1993. The reversionary interest reserved by the City through this deed would require Valley to pay to City the appraised value of the property in the event Valley fails to continue the operation of permanent housing for “handicapped homeless” or Valley sells the Property with the City’s approval. Valley now intends to redevelop the site into a 68-unit permanent supportive housing development for formerly homeless individuals, including those with disabilities. For the purposes of acquiring Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”) Valley must transfer ownership of the property to Saltair Lofts, LLC (“Saltair”), of which Valley is the managing partner. This conveyance to Saltair triggers the City’s reversionary interest and would require Valley to pay the City appraised value of the Property. Valley will be the lead service provider for the residents, with Housing Connect providing operating support and property management through project-based vouchers. This includes on- site case management. The new development will incorporate all-electric building systems and will comply with the ENERGY STAR Multifamily New Construction (MFNC) and Enterprise Green Communities energy efficiency standards. The project will include amenities such as a community courtyard, clinic, case management offices, community kitchen, exercise room, and computer lab. The City’s participation through the release of its reversionary interest in exchange for a recorded Restrictive Use Agreement ensures that the new Saltair Lofts project will preserve affordability, specifically for disabled residents, and supportive services long-term. The Restrictive Use Agreement will be recorded on title and will run with the land for the duration of the affordability term, ensuring compliance and annual reporting to the City. This action aligns with the City’s Housing SLC (2023–2027) plan and the Thriving in Place strategy, both of which prioritize the use of City resources to preserve and expand deeply affordable and supportive housing. The project will replace eight older units with 68 new, high- quality supportive homes while maintaining long-term affordability and on-site behavioral health services. PUBLIC PROCESS: Any adjustment to the purchase price or lease rate from fair market value will be subject to approval by the City Council pursuant to §10-8-2 and City Code 2.58. Accordingly, the City has completed a public benefits analysis that includes the: A. Specific benefits the City will receive in return for discounting the property or lease; B. The City’s purpose for the discount, including an analysis of the way the appropriation will be used to enhance the safety, health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort, or convenience of the inhabitants of the City; and C. Whether the discount is necessary and appropriate to accomplish the reasonable goals and objectives of the City in the area of economic development, job creation, affordable housing, elimination of a development impediment, job preservation, the preservation of historic structures and property, and any other public purpose. The managing member of Saltair Lofts is Valley, a Utah nonprofit organization. However, the majority partner, Richman Group is a for-profit organization, and, as such, a formal public benefit analysis is required under Utah Code. EXHIBITS: A. Site Map B. Quit Claim Deed C. Resolution D. Term Sheet E. Public Benefits Analysis EXHIBIT A: SITE MAP EXHIBIT B: RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. OF 2025 (Authorizing the release of Salt Lake City’s reversionary interest in a property located at 107 South 800 West, Salt Lake City) WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”) previously conveyed certain real property located at 107 South 800 West, Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Property”), to Valley Behavioral Health, Incorporated, a Utah nonprofit corporation (“Valley”), through a Quit Claim Deed recorded in 1992 that reserved a reversionary interest to the City; and WHEREAS, Valley now intends to convey the Property to a new entity, Saltair Lofts, LLC, to demolish the existing eight-unit structure and develop a new 68-unit permanent supportive housing project known as “Saltair Lofts” to serve formerly homeless individuals, including those with disabilities; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that releasing the reversionary interest in the Property to help enable the development of Saltair Lofts in exchange for a Restrictive Use Agreement recorded on the Property preserving all 68 units as affordable permanent supportive housing is necessary and appropriate to achieve the City’s housing and community development objectives; and WHEREAS, the City has conducted a Public Benefits Analysis pursuant to Utah Code Section 10-8-2 and Salt Lake City Code Section 2.58, which demonstrates that the release of the reversionary interest provides substantial public benefit through the creation of deeply affordable housing, housing for individuals with disabilities, on-site behavioral health services, and sustainable design practices; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such release is consistent with the City’s Housing SLC (2023–2027) Plan and Thriving in Place anti-displacement strategy, and that it will enhance the safety, health, and prosperity of City residents; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: 1. The City Council hereby approves the release of the City’s reversionary interest as set forth in the 1992 Quit Claim Deed for the Property located at 107 South 800 West on the condition that a Restrictive Use Agreement be recorded on the Property memorializing the public benefits to be received by the City. 2. The City Council further authorizes the Mayor, or her designee, to execute the Release of Reversionary Interest and the Restrictive Use Agreement consistent with the term sheet attached hereto as Exhibit C. 3. The City Council hereby adopts and incorporates the findings of the Public Benefits Analysis attached hereto as Exhibit D. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, on TBD, 2025. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office /s/ Allison Parks Allison Parks, Deputy City Attorney EXHIBIT C TERM SHEET At the time the Release of the Revisionary Interest is recorded, the Restrictive Use Agreement shall be recorded against the Property and contain, at minimum, the following key terms and obligations: AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1. Unit Requirements: Saltair Lofts, LLC (“Saltair”) shall develop and maintain a minimum of 68 units. The units shall be made available and affordable to individuals meeting the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) adopted definition of chronically homeless. 2. Income Restrictions: Units shall be made available only to households that have an aggregate annual income for all qualifying occupants that is at or below the following area median income (“AMI”) for Salt Lake City Utah, Metro Fair Market Rent Area as annually determined by HUD and adjusted for household size. The income restrictions shall be: a. 5 studio units at 30% AMI b. 63 studio units at 40% AMI 3. Maximum Rents: The annualized rent (which includes all required housing costs such as utilities and other charges uniformly assessed to all apartment units, other than charges for optional services) per affordable unit shall be set forth in a written lease and shall not exceed, for the term of the lease, the maximum monthly gross rental rate utilized by IRC Section 42(g)(2) of the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) program for the applicable AMI and unit type and as updated annually. Specifically: a. 5 studio units at 25% AMI b. 63 studio units at 35% AMI HOUSING FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES: Within the Project’s 68 units, a minimum of nine units shall be made available to individuals with mobility impairments. Such units shall be designed to ensure full usability by persons with mobility limitations. SUPPORTIVE SERVICES: Saltair shall ensure the following supportive services are provided to the residents: on-site case management, clinical services, and resident support programming consistent with best practices for permanent supportive housing. The building will also include resident amenities including a community kitchen, fitness area, computer room, and outdoor courtyard. SUSTAINABILITY: The Project shall be all-electric and certified under Energy Star MFNC and Enterprise Green Communities standards. MONITORING 1. Saltair will permit annual inspections at reasonable times by City or its designee to determine compliance with these conditions and covenants. 2. Saltair will provide an initial report demonstrating compliance with the public benefits, including the affordability requirements at full occupancy and, if requested by City, provide annual compliance and affordability documentation each year, no later than thirty (30) days after December 31. 3. If requested by the City, Saltair will recertify income annually with source documents or written statements from the household indicating household size and annual income. TERM: The term of this agreement shall extend until 50 consecutive years from the date the agreement is executed. FORECLOSURE: In the event of a foreclosure, the only restriction that would remain on the Property would be for the units to be made available only to households that have an aggregate annual income for all qualifying occupants that is at or below 60% of the “AMI” for Salt Lake City Utah, Metro FMR Fair Market Rent Area as annually determined by HUD and adjusted for household size. EXHIBIT D: PUBLIC BENEFIT ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM TO: City Council Members SUBJECT: Public Benefits Analysis for the release of Salt Lake City’s reversionary interest on a property owned by Valley Behavioral Health located at 107 South 800 West in exchange for a restrictive use agreement recorded on the Property preserving public benefits. INTRODUCTION Salt Lake City (“City”) has a reversionary interest in property located at 107 South 800 West (“Property”). The Property was originally conveyed by the City to Valley Behavioral Health (“Valley”) in 1992. Valley proposes to redevelop the Property into a 68-unit permanent supportive housing project serving formerly homeless individuals, including those with disabilities. For the purposes of acquiring Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (“LIHTC”) Valley must transfer ownership of the Property to a separate legal entity, Saltair Lofts, LLC (“Saltair”), of which Valley is the managing partner. In exchange for the City’s release of its reversionary interest, Saltair will record a Restrictive Use Agreement preserving certain public benefits, including 68 units as affordable, supportive housing for 50 years. The release of the City’s reversionary interest serves a significant public purpose by enabling construction of a new deeply affordable housing development that addresses homelessness and behavioral health challenges through the inclusion of supportive services. Saltair will replace an aging eight-unit structure with a modern, sustainable building that will create 68 homes that will allow residents to access on-site case management, behavioral health services, and community amenities that promote housing stability and well-being. This action directly advances Salt Lake City’s Housing SLC (2023–2027) plan and the Thriving in Place anti-displacement strategy by utilizing City resources to expand permanent supportive housing, improve neighborhood stability, and reduce homelessness. The project’s all-electric design aligns with the City’s Climate Positive 2040 goals, while its proximity to public transit promotes accessibility and sustainability. Accordingly, the City finds that the release of its reversionary interest provides substantial and measurable public benefit consistent with Utah Code §10-8-2. The Restrictive Use Agreement that will be recorded on the Property ensures long-term affordability, supportive services, and accountability, providing lasting value to the City and its residents. LEGAL FRAMEWORK Under Utah law, after first holding a public hearing, a municipal body may appropriate funds “for any purpose that, in the judgment of the municipal legislative body, provides for the safety, health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort, or convenience of the inhabitants of the municipality.” The factors that must be considered by the City Council in determining the propriety of making such an appropriation or waiver to any type of entity or individual other than a nonprofit entity are set forth under Utah Code §10-8-2(3)(e). The factors include: (1) The specific benefits (including intangible benefits) to be received by the City in return for the arrangement; (2) The City’s purpose in making the appropriation, including an analysis of how the safety, health, prosperity, moral well-being, peace, order, comfort or convenience of the residents of Salt Lake City will be enhanced; and (3) Whether the appropriation is “necessary and appropriate” to accomplish the reasonable goals and objectives of the City in the areas of economic development, job creation, affordable housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the preservation of historic structures and property, and any other public purpose. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT AND CITY PROPERTY The Property located at 107 South 800 West was originally conveyed by the City to Valley in 1992 for the purposes of developing and maintaining housing for homeless and disabled individuals. The Quit Claim Deed included a reversionary interest in favor of the City. Valley constructed an eight-unit affordable apartment complex on the site in 1993, which has since served low-income individuals in need of stable housing. The reversionary interest provides that in the event that Valley sells the property, upon City approval, the appraised value at the time of sale of the land shall be repaid to the City. Valley now proposes to redevelop the site into a 68-unit permanent supportive housing development that will provide deeply affordable housing for formerly homeless individuals, including people with disabilities and mobility impairments. The redevelopment will replace aging, inefficient housing with a modern, sustainable facility that provides comprehensive on-site supportive services (“Project”). Valley will convey the Property to Saltair, which triggers the reversionary interest established in the deed. The project site is half an acre in size and is zoned TSA-UN-T, located approximately .4 miles from a TRAX station. The new building will feature ground-floor clinical and community service space, including a resident clinic, case management offices, community kitchen, fitness area, computer room, and outdoor courtyard. Valley will serve as both developer and lead service provider, leveraging over three decades of experience operating supportive housing and behavioral health programs. Housing Connect will provide property management services through project-based vouchers, ensuring long-term operational stability. The City’s release of its reversionary interest is a necessary and appropriate action to enable the development of the new Project. Further, requiring Saltair to record a Restrictive Use Agreement on the Property will ensure long-term affordability, housing for individuals with mobility impairments, and supportive services. TERMS OF THE RESTRICTIVE USE AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC BENEFITS PROVIDED I. Terms of Restrictive Use Agreement; Costs to the City The City’s release of its 1992 reversionary interest will be executed concurrently with the recording of a Restrictive Use Agreement on the Property. The Restrictive Use Agreement will: • Ensure 5 studio units are preserved as permanent supportive housing for households earning at or below 30% of the area median income (“AMI”), adjusted for household size; • Ensure 63 studio units are preserved as permanent supportive housing for households earning at or below 40% of the area median income (“AMI”), adjusted for household size; • Require a minimum of nine units to be made available to individuals with mobility impairments; • Remain in effect for a minimum of 50 years, running with the land and binding all successors and assigns. • Require annual reporting to the City verifying compliance with affordability and tenant selection. • Ensure the Project is constructed as all-electric and certified under Energy Star MFNC and Enterprise Green Communities standards. Upon execution, the City’s reversionary interest will be fully released, and the Restrictive Use Agreement will be recorded to ensure long-term enforceability and monitoring by the City. II. Costs to the City The appraised value of the Property as of June 2024, is $2,240,000. In accordance with the reversionary interest, this amount would have been paid to the City upon approving the sale of the property. The release of the reversionary interest makes the Project financially feasible by offsetting the costs associated with supportive housing and on-site service space. The City’s contribution of the release of its reversionary interest in exchange for long-term affordability for homeless and disabled individuals and supportive housing commitments is necessary and appropriate to accomplish the reasonable goals and objectives of the City through the development of the public benefits in the Project. II. Public Benefits Provided by the Project. The Project delivers significant and quantifiable public benefits that justify the City’s release of its reversionary interest under Utah Code §10-8-2, including: Permanent Supportive Housing Creation: 68 new, service-enriched units targeted to formerly homeless individuals and persons with disabilities. Behavioral Health and Support Services: Comprehensive on-site services including case management, clinical treatment, and life skills programs provided by Valley Behavioral Health’s experienced team. Sustainability and Design Excellence: All-electric, high-performance building design meeting Energy Star MFNC and Enterprise Green Communities standards. Transit-Oriented Development: Located within walking distance of TRAX and bus lines, reducing car dependence and supporting the City’s goal of improving access to opportunity for likely transit users who are underserved. Economic and Social Value: Reduces City expenditures on emergency and crisis response services through stable housing solutions. III. Salt Lake City’s Purposes and Enhancing the Quality of Life for Residents. By releasing the reversionary interest, the City directly advances its purpose of improving safety, health, prosperity, and moral well-being for residents. The project converts an aging and underutilized property into a community asset that provides: • A supportive, service-rich environment enabling residents to stabilize their lives. • Integration of behavioral health care and housing, reducing strain on public safety and healthcare systems. The Project will also help reduce nuisance activity and blight in the area, promote community cohesion, and enhance the comfort and convenience of residents citywide. IV. Accomplishing Salt Lake City’s Goals. By developing 68 units of permanent supportive housing, the Project supports the City’s Housing Plan, Housing SLC (2023-2027), which outlines strategies to address Salt Lake City’s shortage of approximately 5,500 units of affordable housing. Housing SLC heavily prioritizes individuals and households who face the greatest risk of housing insecurity and displacement. To do this, the City has developed the following goals: 1) Make progress toward closing the housing gap of 5,500 units of deeply affordable housing by entitling a minimum of 2,000 deeply affordable (30% AMI or below) units and a minimum of 2,000 affordable (31%-80% AMI) units throughout the city. 2) Increasing housing stability throughout the city. The plan also provides guidance for evaluating and appropriating City funds for housing. The priorities relevant to the Project are as follows: 1) Incentivizing new residential development where it will benefit the most people. 2) Support new housing at all income levels by making it easy and attractive to build affordable housing. 3) Increase spending on rental assistance and affordable housing construction and develop new funding sources to make it possible. 4) Create rental housing opportunities in every neighborhood. Additionally, the Project helps further Strategic Priority 3e of Thriving in Place, the City’s anti- displacement strategy plan, to produce more affordable housing, prioritizing long-term affordability, supportive services, and transit access. CONCLUSION The development of the Project will provide significant benefit to residents of the City. The City’s release of its reversionary interest in exchange for the Restrictive Use Agreement for the Project represents an appropriate use of City resources to achieve the City’s reasonable goals and objectives…in the area of economic development, job creation, affordable housing, blight elimination, resource center development, job preservation, the preservation of historic structures and property. This contribution enables the creation of 68 new supportive housing units, ensures long-term affordability, and provides vital on-site behavioral health services that improve resident outcomes and reduce public costs. Accordingly, Salt Lake City finds that the release of its reversionary interest provides substantial public benefit consistent with Utah Code §10-8-2 and City Code §2.58, enhances the welfare of residents, and is in the best interest of the City and its inhabitants. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/03/2025 Date Sent To Council: 09/04/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Parviz Faiz to the Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent and ending on the first Monday in June. Parviz Faiz currently lives in District 3. Approved:* Otto, Rachel Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/19/2025 15:55 Travis STARLEY MF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment Please see attached letter from Central City Neighborhood Council regarding RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment. Thanks, Travis Starley **Attachment 1 - 2 pages 11/19/2025 15:58 Matt Sadauckas Salt Lake Zoning Dear Salt Lake City Council, I am a resident of District 5 and I want to comment in favor of adopting simplified, streamlined, by-right zoning ordinances in Salt Lake City. As many commenters this evening have pointed out, we need more housing in this city as population increases and the secret is out that Salt Lake City is great. For far too long, restrictive zoning that benefits the incumbent residents has restricted natural growth of the housing stock in this city. One speaker spoke in favor of market rate housing, pointing out the ways that it lowers the prices of rents at the bottom of the market. My neighborhood has a large and persistent homeless population and the best way to keep this issue from worsening is by improving the affordability of rent at the bottom of the housing market. The homelessness epidemic is the source of many concerns about public safety. Improving rental market affordability will have a direct impact on the amount the city spends on public safety concerns. Further, by increasing the supply of housing that allows people to live near where they work, especially for residents who staff our restaurants, teach the kids, and form the backbone of our workforce, we can help reduce traffic and improve the efficacy of public transit. This will have a further catalyzing effect of making it easier to start and sustain the small businesses that make our city so appealing. I urge the council to pass the ordinance streamlining city zoning. Making zoning simpler and faster to navigate will directly reduce the cost of new housing. More housing will help matter is urgent. Thank you for your consideration. Matt Sadauckas detected in the water from City Creek Aquifer • Testing and construction activities begin November 19, 2025 • Activity will close 1/3 of the north island of City Creek Park and the bridge at 4th Avenue and Canyon Road Attached to this letter is a flyer SLCPU distributed to many in the Canyon Road neighborhood. The flyer describes the pollution problem, the proposed activity, and future of the pump and well. The PFAS particles were discovered in 2013 and the well was taken off line then. Also attached to this email is a letter sent to SLCPU with these additional questions: • What will be the short term and long term impacts on the park landscaping, any tree removal anticipated? • Is there a budget for revegetation? • What kind of signs and public education are anticipated? • Is there a chance the well will be decommissioned and the building surplused? • Would decommissioning result in drilling a new location on the aquifer? • At what point downstream from the City Creek Water Treatment plant does the PFAS start to appear? • Any indication that recent construction at the City Creek Water Treatment plant may have been a source of the aquifer contamination? • Once the source of the PFAS is identified what are the remediation steps and the construction effects on the neighborhood, parks, and City Creek? There's been no reply to these questions yet. We'll send them along when SLCPU gets back to us. You may ask your own questions of SLCPU about the well by emailing 4thavewell@slc.gov . If you hear anything interesting from them please forward to the email address on this email. Happy Thanksgiving, Craig S Ogan RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment Council Members, Thank you for your time and service. I am writing on behalf of concerned residents and property owners in the Central City neighborhood regarding the proposed changes to the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. We appreciate that the proposal has improved in some ways. However, key issues remain that must be addressed before the ordinance is finalized. One major concern is the setback requirement. The current proposal allows buildings to be constructed just 4 feet from the property line. At that distance, building code rules limit the use of windows and balconies, resulting in long, blank walls that face neighboring homes. This harms the look and feel of our neighborhoods and affects the quality of life for nearby residents. Increasing the minimum setback to 5 feet would allow for more window openings and a better transition between old and new buildings. This small change could make a big difference. These changes would especially impact older neighborhoods like Central City, Capitol Hill, and the Avenues. Many buildings in these areas were built before zoning rules were established and are located right at the property line. These buildings often have more units than would be allowed under today’s code. We want to prioritize the longevity of our historic homes, so we are Attachment 1 - Page 1 particularly concerned that the City has allowed dozens of historic buildings to be delisted and Zoning changes should support affordable and sustainable housing, not incentivize demolition. The Central 9th Community Council raised similar issues several years ago, and the same problems are now appearing across other parts of the city. If the City is going to allow more height or density, that added value must come with real public benefit. We believe any future development should include: •Homes for purchase, like townhomes or condos, not just rental units •Family-sized units with three or more bedrooms •Affordable housing priced below market rates •Green space that is open to the public and designed to be usable •Ground-floor retail or commercial spaces that serve the neighborhood These are the things that make neighborhoods more livable, more connected, and more equitable. Finally, we are concerned that these changes will have unequal impacts. Older neighborhoods with historic buildings will be affected the most, but the proposed rules do little to protect them. The city must do more to support preservation and make sure that any zoning updates work for both current residents and future growth. Thank you for considering our comments and for your commitment to thoughtful planning. Sincerely, Kara Freedman, Annie Isaacson and Travis Starley Central City Neighborhood Council Land Use Committee demolished in recent years without a public process. We would like to see the zoning codes protect the currently existing historic buildings that reflect the desirable "missing middle." Attachment 1 - Page 2 Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/19/2025 17:23 Rosalie Mae Nov 20, 2025 Homelessness Campus Discussion - Comments advance of tomorrows meeting. I believe this centralized, campus-style approach would be very beneficial to our unhoused neighbors. I have concerns about the involuntary admittance idea and how that would work. Under no circumstances do we need more cops on the streets rounding up people who they think must be forced into this center. This feels much like what other groups have done with "undesirables", disappearing them and centralizing them against their will for the good of the public. As it is, shelters are already overfilled, and cops kicking people out of spaces because they are unhoused is not a solution. We need more social workers to be involved even now. My additional concern with this campus is the security and services. Many people refuse to go to shelters because of a lack of privacy, the inability to bring pets with them, or harsh treatment or judgement (actual or perceived) by shelter staff. This campus needs to be a space where people feel they CAN just show up, not just another option when cops come to kick them out of where they currently are. We talk as a city and state about preserving the dignity and humanity of our unhoused neighbors, and from what I have read beyond the official project idea, I do not have faith that this project will ultimately preserve that humanity. I urge the city council to consult with other humanitarian and social service organizations, and to consider an emphasis on treatment and support, not policing, when designing the programs for this campus. I ask you to reflect- will this campus serve the best comfort of the general population, many of whom would rather these people disappeared? Thank you. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/20/2025 16:10 Ian McCubbin 1/2 SLC WUI Code The city's adoption of the new Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) code has been profoundly disappointing due to the complete rejection of public input, culminating in the City Council's approval of a poorly drafted code. SLCFD ignored summer feedback, and the Planning Commission dismissed concerns in September, incorrectly redirecting citizens to state legislators before voting to approve the code despite public opposition. This flawed the new WUI zone. The City missed a vital chance to implement a truly effective code, instead forcing a process raises serious questions about democracy, justice, inclusion, and equity within the city government, despite a diverse legislative body. These concerns are amplified by troubling local events like an October ICE arrest overseen by SLCPD and a June shooting death at a downtown protest. While a bipartisan federal effort like Senator Curtis's "Fix our Forest Act" advances wildfire mitigation, the City of Salt Lake failed to implement the WUI Code completely sidelining public input, severely eroding faith in both the administration and City Council. For eight years, residents have urged SLC to address poor land management in the high-to-extreme fire risk Foothill Open Space, managed by Salt Lake Public Lands and Public Utility. Crucially, the proposed SLC WUI code excludes this city-owned, high-risk land. While the WUI Code is a critical step, its current focus only on privately owned properties near natural vegetation (Upper Avenues, East Bench, Capitol Hill) has negative financial from City-owned lands and neglected Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) electrical infrastructure in high-to-extreme risk zones. Protecting the vital City Creek Canyon Fireshed and water supply must be prioritized and integrated into WUI planning. A major oversight is the code's failure to mandate essential Community Wildfire Preparedness homes, dense vegetation, and high public use significantly increase fire risk, threatening nearby residences and critical infrastructure like the Morris reservoir. Homeowners' efforts to "Harden Structures" and "Manage the Environment" are severely limited because the City's Public Lands and Public Utility Departments have neglected to manage high-risk City land and have ignored years of requests to mitigate RMP's electrical infrastructure risk. infrastructure on City-owned, high-risk land. Nearly 90% of US wildfires are human-caused, and utility equipment sparks are a primary source of catastrophic fires (e.g., Camp, Tubbs, Eaton, West Texas, Lahaina, Marshall Fires). RMP's aging grid and reduced liability from state laws influence its conservative investment. SLC has not adequately hardened RMP infrastructure, implemented power shut-offs, or buried lines in the WUI. The WUI and causing a loss of home equity for residents. Increased wildfire frequency and intensity due to climate change raise concerns about long-term human health risks from soil contamination, as demonstrated by the Los Angeles County soil sampling program following the 2025 Palisades and Eaton fires, which found chemical signatures linked to building material combustion (lead, cadmium, zinc) and the fire itself (dioxins and PAHs). Respectfully Ian McCubbin Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/20/2025 18:39 Anonymous Constituent Parking on City Streets We need to prohibit or start enforcing any existing ordinance that prohibits parking detached trailers boats etc, that are being stored on city streets, Been havig a problem getting garbage out to curb where a trailer occupies the pay the increased tax later on...Greenbike stations(do we already know where they are going to be installed ?) I personally have not noticed any stations west of 900w and about Indiana, i know there is the one by the fairpark and over by 300w and 900s...So hoping that one gets installed by redwood rd: I believe that having one at the park behind the Smiths on 900w 800s would be ideal--even a little further west... Ill support afterschool programs and programs for rehabilitation.. P.S. You all hit the nail right on with these proposals...lets just hope nothing important was cut or money diverted from other important programs to fund this. (yup im the period, dotdotdotdotdot, typing this all out with one breathe.) with mosquitoes that can have west Nile virus.if those people get sick they spread all over the city.besides that,it SNAP benefits, there has been a noticeable increase in demand on the area's food pantries. Supply isn't keeping up. In your position, we would like to request your help in swaying City Council to do more to leverage any available funds to supplement the local food pantries. We've heard demand is up 25%, which is quite the significant bump. Additionally, a request of the residents from your office to consider being a bit more generous could make a big difference. Many (not all) have plenty of wiggle room in their budgets to spare an extra $100+ a month, and some wouldn't miss 10-20x that amount. Thank you for considering our request. Cheers -Eric & Alyssa would think of the housing shortage more like the great toilet paper shortage of 2020. Investors are not the solution, they drive up the cost of limited resources. Substadies also drive up costs because supply and demand are the determinants of cost. Just like the toilet paper shortage, a limit on how much you can buy is the only way to allow others a chance at ownership of the resource. Investors are not saving our city or making it more affordable. We are becoming a city of haves and have nots... Thus the "missing middle" that the haves can keep absorbing without anyone saying anything at all. I know you represent an area with a lot of haves, but the have nots who rent are my neighbors, not the investors who own the properties. Can you work on finding a limit? Any limit, even a hundred single family homes is more protection of our delicate housing market than we have now. Please talk to an economist, or think of housing like toilet paper as it is something we all need. Please let me know if you received this. I appreciate your consideration. Lori Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/24/2025 10:10 Jim Jenkin 1/2 RMF-35 proposal damages Local Historic Districts Dear Concilmember Dugan, While I am not in your District, I appreciated your comments during the Working Session, and I believe the similarities with the 3rd District suggest you might be interested in the following points, which I humbly ask that you consider. Respectfully yours, Jim Jenkin Land Use Committee Chair, Greater Avenues Community Council Comments on Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment To: Salt Lake City Council members From: Jim Jenkin, Chair, GACC Land Use Committee 14 November, 2025 It is the stated goal of Planning Initiatives to protect the existing character of the neighborhood. In a Local Historic District the character of the neighborhood is defined by the Historic District. If this were not so there would be no District. Such Districts is composed of a gestalt of historically contributory properties, and the pattern of private and public green space. This character is neither anchored nor dependent on single historic structures but on the aggregate of all contributing structures to that District. Properties zoned RMF-35 exist within the Avenues, Central City, South Temple, and University Historic Districts (per SLC Zoning Map). The Avenues is particularly vulnerable in the large number of houses zoned RMF-35 that present as SR-1A. This is due to the broadbrush nature of the original RMF-35 zoning. While my viewpoint is necessarily Avenues-centric, significant historic character is a part of the civic and community identity across the City, and, once lost, can never be replaced. I submit that the proposed ordinance as currently crafted fails to protect the character of the community in Local Historic Districts in the following ways: The proposed ordinance limits protections from height and setback encroachment to only Federal Registry properties. Registry properties compose an extremely small subset of contributory historic structures, and individual listings are discouraged by the Secretary of the Interior in existing Historic Districts. Limiting protections to Federal Registry properties is appropriate outside of Local Historic Districts. Within Historic Districts the character of the neighborhood is composed of a gestalt of contributory Historic properties, therefore, encroachment protections should be extended to all contributory structures in a Local Historic District. Planning Staff contends that sufficient protection will be afforded to contributory structures by the process of review by the Historic Landmarks Commission (the Commission). While one cannot fault Staff for supporting the established process, this Observer, as well as others, finds this statement unsupportable, in that: The majority of applications for contributory and non-contributing structures are reviewed at Staff level and thus relatively few are forwarded to the full Commission. For example, at ~225 A Street is a two-and-a-half story flat roof residence that was administratively permitted in ~2010 by recent Planning Staff as a story-and-a-half residence, and in contravention of the Capitol Vista Overlay. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/24/2025 10:10 Jim Jenkin 2/2 CONTINUED!! RMF-35 proposal damages Local Historic Districts capacity of the existing zoning. I have verified this statement with a recent former member of the Historic Landmarks Commission. Summary: The Character of existing Local Historic Districts cannot be maintained under the proposed ordinance as written and the proposal should be defeated. Deficiencies in the proposal will also result in loss of tree coverage, green space, and the possible disruption of private solar generation by height encroachment. Affordability: Local Historic Districts provide an important pool of naturally occurring affordable housing which, while unquantified, is easily established by observing advertised rental rates (even though the choice properties rent word-of-mouth). Under current conditions (construction cost estimates around $350,000 per unit for “affordable” designs) new construction will not result in affordability in the desired “missing middle”. step-back protections afforded to Registry Properties be extended to all Contributory Structures in Local Historic Districts, and by directing the Planning Department to undertake a survey to identify properties that are SR-1 within RMF-35 zoned areas. A survey for structures exceeding RMF-35 was undertaken by Planning Staff in the formulation of this proposal, but no survey was undertaken to identify areas of SR-1. As an example, Second Avenue between F and G presents entirely as SR-1, exempt for an historic LDS facility. Therefore a survey for SR-1 properties within the RMF would correct oversites in the original downzone. Respectfully Submitted, Jim Jenkin Chair, Greater Avenues Community Council (GACC) Land Use Committee; former Chair, GACC; former Member, Salt Lake Transportation advisory Board (2 terms). landusecom@slc-avenues.org I thank and acknowledge members of the Land Use Committee for their contributions to this document. Jim Jenkin Chair, Land Use Committee Greater Avenues Community Council Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/24/2025 10:15 Scott Narus Ongoing discussions with DPU re: FY26 water/sewer rates and fire water line rates regarding FY26 water/sewer rates and fire water line rates. It has been very frustrating that we have been in discussions with them since January for the former item and August for the latter item. Their current response came 58 days after our original letter transmittal, and they missed at least 2 self-imposed deadlines for responding. This is particularly troubling since, as we described in our reply to them, their email did not respond to the specifics of our letters. DPU did not even acknowledge the many violations of City and State Code and Utah Supreme Court precedents we claimed. They simply gave us the same information they have been feeding us since July, which they could have done shortly after receiving our letters instead of waiting almost 2 months. Despite numerous requests, they have also failed to provide us with information about a required administrative appeals process. This leaves us in a financially troubling state because we are required to develop our HOA's budget for next calendar year before the end of this year, and we calculate that our yearly cost for public utilities ranges from $17,693 to $24,640 based on whether DPU agrees to our proposals or sustains the current rate schemes (a $7,000 difference). We cannot complete our budget and decide whether or not we will need to raise HOA fees in January without some resolution. That is why we were hoping for an equitable response based on our action-request letters. We also hope that you will review our claims in our letter and in our reply to DPU regarding are currently charging, the current process they are using to "correct" the Consolidated Fee Schedule (CFS) to establish a basis to charge these fees, and their continued charging of the unpublished fees in violation of City Code. As we have detailed, we have found no evidence that DPU ever informed the City Council of the fee changes, they never supplied materials describing the fee changes, and the City Council never approved, in any form, the fees they are now charging. Because of this, DPU is incurring significant financial liability that will eventually have to be repaid, and this must be stopped immediately. The City Council should also reject any ordinance to "correct" the CFS since the Council never approved the fees in the first place, and should ask that DPU go through a new budget amendment process (including public comments) to establish the new fire water line fees. Respectfully, -scott narus **Attachment 2 - 4 pages & Attachment 3 - 3 pages are facing a huge challenge 20th getting the Great Salt Lake back up to save levels for both humans and animals. Comments to DPU document of Nov 11, 2025 The DPU document of Nov 11, 2025, titled “Public Utility’s Fire Line Response to Council Questions”, is copied here in blue italics, with comments inserted in black: General Comment: The analysis presented by DPU is unserious and wholly inadequate because (a) it does not answer the heart of the Council’s questions concerning how to lessen the immediate impact of the significant increase in fire water line fees, and (b) it does not give any account for the projected costs for fire water lines over the 3 years used in their analysis, nor does it present any historical data about the costs incurred or the costs borne by customers in order to compare these with projected costs and proposed cost distribution. Additionally, none of this analysis takes into account the additional monthly fixed fee DPU has added to fire water line invoices. This additional fee could substantially make up for the claimed shortfall in revenue. (We still claim that this additional monthly fixed fee was never published, never reviewed and never approved by the City Council, so it should be removed immediately. But we show an analysis at the end of this document that revenue collected from this second fee actually more than covers the shortfall DPU projects for the phase-in strategies presented, and significantly reduces the cost per customer of the cost-sharing strategy, too.) •The projected revenue shortfall under various phase-in options, as well as the total anticipated annual revenue from the ire line fees. To what extent could the phase-in mitigate the $740,237 estimated if the fee were not implemented at all. •How would the delayed implementation impact the department’s ability to fund budgeted projects and other critical projects? And to what extent some projects may reasonably be delayed to accommodate the phase-in. •Whether the delayed implementation of the ire line fees over multiple years would result in revenue needed to be made up for through other fees or compensated in future iscal years. Answering the irst question, we considered two phase in options for the ire line fee, Phase 1 is a 2 year implementation and Phase 2 is a 3 year implementation. We also considered who will bear the costs that are associated with maintaining this system. This table shows the expected revenue over 3 years, FY26-FY28, and the revenue shortfall for the two options and our previous rate structure of $1 per inch: FY26 FY27 FY28 Revenue & Shortfall Current Rate $2,011,429 $2,112,000 $2,217,600 $6,341,030 Phase 1 $1,005,714 $2,112,000 $2,217,600 -$1,005,714 Phase 2 $670,646 $1,408,000 $2,217,600 -$2,044,953 Previous Rate $271,692 $271,692 $271,692 -$5,525,954 Attachment 2 - Page 1 Comment: Note that the revenue shortfall between the “Current Rate” and the “Previous Rate” for FY26 is $1,739,737, yet DPU stated previously that the shortfall would be $740,237, a difference of $1M. This needs to be explained before a thorough analysis of the table can be performed. DPU shows a constant rate for FY26 to FY28 in the row for Previous Rate. But City Code states that CFS fees may be updated yearly for CPI without requiring further approval, so presumably each of these years could be updated per estimated CPI. (Because they were not updated for CPI over the years since 1961, this is the primary cause for the claimed shortfall in revenue for ire water line fees.) The yearly revenue increase for the “Current Rate” row is 5%. Is that the budgeted rate, and, if so, where is it re lected in DPU’s budget projections? (Since private ire water lines aren’t broken out in any of the budget information we have seen, we assume this hasn’t been described.) If DPU is expecting a 5% increase in this fee per year, is this in place of CPI or is it on top of CPI? If 5% is the approved, budgeted increase for water rates in general, could DPU use this increase on the “Previous Rate” in order to show increased revenue through FY28? The 2024 Rate Study states that the total cost of “Private Firelines” is $260,000 per year (page 5, Table ES-6). It’s interesting that the revenue collected under the “Previous Rate” appears to be more than enough to cover this cost, and the revenue estimated to be collected under the “Current Rate” far exceeds this cost, which would be a violation of Utah Supreme Court precedent. Nowhere does DPU explain why they need $6,341,030 over the next 3 years to cover costs for private ire lines. They give overly broad statements later in the document concerning O&M, but they really have the onus of explaining that in more detail to justify the signi icant increase they are asking for here. Note that the utility cost for O&M of Public Fire Protection is $850,000 (2024 Rate Study, page 41, Figure 16), and surely there must be more Public infrastructure (and cost) than Private. To answer the second question, these are maintenance and operational costs of the system to provide the level of service required by existing infrastructure. Postponing maintenance any longer than we already have creates substantial risk of failure that is more costly to repair than to maintain. Any shortfall in revenue to pay for the maintenance and repair of the system is paid for using debt through bonds or loans, and will therefore have to be paid back with interest in future rates. Comment: Is DPU stating that they are NOT currently maintaining the system under the “previous rates”? If so, how was this not recognized earlier and the rates updated previously? From the previous table, DPU states that there will be a $5.5M shortfall over the next 3 years if the “previous rates” are kept, which also implies that there was some signi icant fraction of that amount in shortfall over the previous 3+ years (leading to a claimed postponing of maintenance). Again, it is hard to believe that such a sizable shortfall would not have been noticed previously and the budget (and rates) adjusted accordingly. Attachment 2 - Page 2 Note that total water revenue (including revenue from the new rates) for FY26 results in a budget shortfall of over $24M (according to DPU’s FY26 budget), which will be paid for with transfers from reserves. If there is maintenance and repair that must be paid for during the phase-in period, and it is not covered by fees, how much of an impact would that be to the already expected reserve transfer funds? Does this actually involve debt? As stated previously, DPU should provide more detail about the maintenance costs they estimate will be delayed in order to justify the signi icant rate increases. To answer the third question, any delay in implementing the rates will need to be made up in future years since we cannot escape the costs of operating and maintaining the system. We approached this in two ways, irst is applying these costs to the customers who create them, ie ire lines, and second is to apply this to other customers. This table shows the rates that would be established in FY28 to make up for the revenue loss: Current Rate Phase 1 Phase 2 FY28 $9.24 $10.29 $14.71 Comment: Since there are multiple rates involved (dependent on ire line size), it’s not clear what the rates in the table refer to. Is this an average rate, or an additional cost added to expected rates in FY28? Is it one-time to make up for the estimated lost revenue or ongoing? How do these rates in FY28 affect the rates and revenue shown in the irst table? As you can see, it would be an 11% increase above the existing rate for Phase 1 and a 59% increase for Phase 2. This does not include accumulated interest on the debt. The second approach is to apply these costs to other customers to cover the cost of service associated with ire lines. While that would not meet our equity goals in the rate structure, we thought it would be helpful to see the impact. Comment: The idea of “equity goals” for ire water lines is suspect. All customers currently share the cost of all the utility costs for public ire suppression. Those with private ire water lines actually bear more of the cost because they pay fees for their ire water line connections as well as a shared cost of the public infrastructure. How does picking up the entire cost of our ire hydrant plus the shared cost of public ire infrastructure point to equity? This table shows the rate increase for each option of customers. Commercial Multi-family Residential All Customers Accounts 12,251 3,273 72,875 88,399 Attachment 2 - Page 3 Phase 1 Increase $6.64 $25.61 $1.15 $0.95 Phase 2 Increase $13.91 $52.07 $2.34 $1.93 Previous Rate $37.59 $140.70 $6.32 $5.21 Comment: It appears that the rate increase for each customer class reflects the amount needed per month to make up for the 3-year shortfall in revenue for each customer scenario. (This was not obvious at first and took a bit of analysis to determine.) But is anyone asking for a single customer class to absorb all the shortfall? This seems like a gratuitous analysis. We can assume that “All Customers” would be the logical model to share the costs in this scenario, but we can also imagine a scenario where those who have private fire water lines would pick up an additional share of their costs, as they do today. In fact, if the additional monthly fixed fee for fire water lines that was added this fiscal year ($22.48, in our case) is used in the revenue projections, we estimate that there is an additional $763,421 in revenue per year1. This equates to an additional $2,290,262 over 3 years. Added to the revenue estimated under “Previous Rates”, this results in a 3- year total revenue of $3,105,338, or a projected shortfall of $3,235,691 (vs. $5,525,954 shown in DPU’s analysis), leading to a monthly rate increase of $3.05 for “All Customers” (vs. $5.21). Note that it also wipes out the shortfalls for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 scenarios. 1 Assuming the $8 we previously paid per month for our 8-inch line is the average, we divide the “Previous Rate” revenue for FY26 shown in the first table ($271,692) by ($8/month x 12 months) to calculate there would be 2,830 customers paying the monthly fire water line fee. (This is likely conservative as an 8-inch line is at the high end of fire water line sizes.) We then multiply the customers by the additional monthly fixed fee ($22.48 for a ¾-inch detector in our case) to get $63,618.40 per month, or $763,421 per year, in revenue. Attachment 2 - Page 4 Comments to Council StaA Memo of Nov 25, 2025 The staA memo of Nov 25, 2025, titled “Consolidate Fee Schedule (CFS) Correction – Missing Title and Description”, is copied here in blue italics, with comments inserted. NEW INFORMATION – NOVEMBER 25, 2025 Following the October 14 work session briefing, Council Members requested a follow-up briefing to discuss a potential phased implementation of the fire line fee increase, which was mentioned during the discussion. Based on the phase-in scenarios and financial analysis presented by Public Utilities, the Council has postponed action on the Consolidated Fee Schedule (CFS) correction to a future meeting, allowing additional time for review and consideration of options and fiscal impacts. Comment: The agenda item shows that the tentative date for Council Action is Dec 2, 2025. The memo and the agenda item state that a Public Hearing is “N/A”. We assert that this entire Ordinance is improper since DPU is asking for a significant change to fees, including the addition of a second, monthly fixed fee, which the Council never had a chance to review and did not approve, and the public never had a chance to comment on. This should not be considered a “correction”. Therefore, this ordinance should be rejected in favor of a new budget amendment detailing the changes to the current fees, explaining the additional monthly fixed fee, and allowing public comment. Lastly, in additional correspondence with the Administration, it was confirmed that the fire line fee, established in City Ordinance 17.16.520 (below) and in place for at least 64 years, had never been included in the published CFS before this fiscal year. This does not affect the City's authority to charge the fee, but does impact the transparency of the fees charged on accounts. Comment: City Ordinance 3.02.020 is the governing authority for City fees and the Consolidated Fee Schedule: 3.02.020: FEE CHARGES: A. No fee may be imposed by the city except as shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule or as provided in this section. No fee, including cost recovery fees, shall exceed the maximum fee shown on the Salt Lake City consolidated fee schedule. B. Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, all Salt Lake City fees shall be established by the city council except that this subsection B shall not apply to any fee: 1. Established pursuant to a franchise, property, or other agreement to which Salt Lake City is a party; 2. Collected by the city but which is required by a federal or state law; 3. Authorized by this code which is applicable to an airport owned or operated by the city; and Attachment 3 - Page 1 4. Authorized by the state construction code or the state fire code and for which the state code allows no city discretion in deciding whether to impose the fee or the amount of the fee. For the purpose of this subsection, the terms "construction code" and "fire code" have the same meanings set forth in the state construction and fire codes act, title 15A, Utah Code Annotated, or its successor. C. After July 1, 2013, any new fee shall be reviewed and approved by the city council (including any fee that otherwise could be established by a city department or the mayor under a previous delegation of authority). D. Within a reasonable time after July 1, 2013, all fees charged by the city shall be identified and itemized by type, amount, the specific source of authority to impose the fee, and the basis for calculating the fee. After all city fees are identified and itemized the city council intends to confirm any fee authority which may be delegated to a city department or the mayor. The council may establish conditions of delegation, such as: 1. Making fee lists readily available to the public, 2. Requiring public notice and comment prior to establishing any new fee, and 3. Reporting all new fees to the city council on a semiannual basis. (Ord. 28- 13, 2013) Note that 3.02.020 (A) and (B) state that any fee charged must be shown in the CFS, and that the City Council establishes all fees (and the fire water line fee is not an allowed exception to this rule). Paragraph (C) states that new fees must be reviewed and approved by the Council, and the new fire water line fees were never reviewed or approved. This applies to fees previously delegated (such as the fire water line fees). Paragraph (D) says that the Council will decide whether to delegate fee authority to a City department. Therefore, the staA memo is wrong that the City has the authority to charge the fee (which also seems to be implying that they have the authority to charge an unpublished fee). Paragraph (D) (1), (2), and (3) also establish specific conditions for delegation of authority, all of which seem to have been violated by the original changes to the CFS and the currently proposed “corrections”. The staA memo is correct that there is an impact to the transparency of fees charged on accounts, and the proposed “corrections” do not fully address this. The proposed “corrections” also obfuscate the actual amount being charged. 17.16.520: UNMETERED FIRE PROTECTION PIPES PERMITTED WHEN: Pipes to be used only in case of fire will be allowed within buildings on the following conditions: A. Applicant must petition the city in writing for permission to install any unmetered or metered fire protection pipe system, and all installation and connection costs and charges in connection therewith shall be paid by the applicant. B. Except for the water source connection, such fire pipes must be entirely unconnected with any other system and must not serve any other function. C. Fire hose connections must contain adequate seals or other measures acceptable to the director of public utilities, so that they can only be used for fighting fires. D. All nonmetered fire system connections to the city water system shall be subject to a charge as determined by the public utilities director. (Prior code § 49-6-41) Attachment 3 - Page 2 Comment: Note that the opening line to this code refers to fire protection pipes “within buildings.” Since our fire hydrant is external to buildings, there is a question as to whether this code actually applies in situation like ours. Also, unless the Council has formally delegated authority for the DPU Director to set fire hydrant water lines charges (paragraph (D)), the authority granted in this code is overridden by 3.02.020. If the delegation of authority in 17.16.520 (D) was granted after establishment of 3.02.020 (which DPU should be asked to confirm), then 3.02.020 (D) (1), (2), and (3) still apply and have been violated by DPU. Attachment 3 - Page 3 Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/24/2025 16:31 Bernie HART This / That ... and magic potions Good Morning, A little of this, and a little of that, creates an interesting story. $63,000,000-168-100-68-6.8- 50/90%-1 Op Rio Grande cost $63 Mil, 168 people were arrested, 100 of those incarcerated chose jail over treatment, 68 people entered treatment, 6-7 people completed treatment, the relapse rate for involuntary participation in treatment is 50-90%. $63M and 1 person was helped. Unless a new magic potion is added to the water at the new proposed shelter, we should expect to spend an outrageous sum of money and get the same dismal results. The same treatment model applied to the same problem in a different location will likely produce the same disappointing outcomes. The successful Prison Program and the Otherside Academy. I have heard that The Otherside Academy has an interesting working relationship with the Parole System. How do I get information on the number of former participants in the Utah State Prison's model prisoners program who end up at The Otherside Academy? And we will be partnering with a local research class to do a study on the chronically homeless in the Salt Lake Region. I am assuming this effort will confirm what we found in a previous informal survey of over 200 campers. Our interests are: Age, place of birth, religious affiliation, jail history, number of times in treatment, names of programs, mental health diagnosis/drug use, and how old they were when they entered the mental health system, and where they slept last night. If the City Council has an interest in this type of information, we would be happy to have you join us. Bernie Hart Understanding Us Salt Lake City, Ut