HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/2025 - Meeting Materials
Board of Directors of the
SALT LAKE CITY
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
AGENDA
November 18, 2025 Tuesday 2:00 PM
Council Work Room
451 South State Street, Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
CRA.SLC.GOV
BOARD MEMBERS:
Darin Mano, Chair Dan Dugan, Vice Chair
Victoria Petro Alejandro Puy Chris Wharton
Eva Lopez Chavez Sarah Young
In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance, the meeting may be held electronically. After 5:00
p.m., please enter the City & County Building through the main east entrance.
This is a discussion among CRA Board Directors and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen,
unless otherwise specified as a public comment period. Items scheduled may be moved and / or discussed
during a different portion of the Meeting based on circumstance or availability of speakers. Item start
times and durations are approximate and are subject to change at the Chair’s discretion.
Generated: 12:14:38
Comments:A.
1.General Comments to the Board ~ 2:00 p.m.
5 min.
The CRA Board of Directors will receive public comments regarding Community
Reinvestment Agency business in the following formats:
1.Written comments submitted to the CRA Board offices: 451 South State Street,
Suite 304, P.O. Box 145476, Salt Lake City, UT. 84114-5476.
2.Comments to the CRA Board of Directors. (Comments are taken on any item not
scheduled for a public hearing, as well as on any other CRA Business. Comments
are limited to two minutes.)
B.Public Hearing - individuals may speak to the Board once per public hearing
topic for two minutes, however written comments are always accepted:
1.Resolution: CRA Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 -
-
The Board will accept public comment about a resolution that would amend the final
budget of the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments in the
Community Reinvestment Agency’s budget, including proposed project additions and
modifications, and staffing changes. The amendment includes reallocating funding from
the Depot District Infrastructure Improvements Program and Program Income Fund to
the Depot District Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program, among other items.
C.Community Reinvestment Agency Business - The CRA Board of Directors
will receive information and/or hold discussions and/or take action on:
1.Approval of Minutes ~ 2:05 p.m.
5 min.
The Board will approve the meeting minutes of June 3, 2025 and June 10, 2025
2.Resolution: CRA Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2025-
26 Follow-Up ~ 2:10 p.m.
10 min.
The Board will receive a follow-up briefing and consider adopting a resolution that would
amend the final budget of the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for
Fiscal Year 2025-26. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect
adjustments in the Community Reinvestment Agency’s budget, including proposed
project additions and modifications, and staffing changes. The amendment includes
reallocating funding from the Depot District Infrastructure Improvements Program and
Program Income Fund to the Depot District Infrastructure Property Acquisition
Program, among other items.
3.Informational: 100 South Between 600 West and Dansie Drive
Pre-Disposition Report
~ 2:20
p.m.
20 min.
The Board will receive a briefing about plans for the disposition of 2.33 acres of land at
approximately 100 South between 600 West and Dansie Drive in the Depot District
project area. The CRA proposes to sell the property for a redevelopment project that may
include housing, artist spaces, and urban farming.
4.Informational: Japantown Streetscape and Public Art Update ~ 2:40 p.m.
30 min.
The Board will receive a briefing about the Japantown Streetscape Design and public art
efforts. Since 2018, the CRA has partnered with the Japanese American community
regarding development matters on Japantown Street, which evolved into the official
Japantown Design Strategy project. The CRA has worked with GSBS Architects and the
Community to translate desires into actionable design elements. The 40% design
package contains construction documents of the streetscape and placemaking project
should the Board decide to move forward with more design.
5.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director TENTATIVE
5 min.
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of information items,
announcements, and scheduling items. The Board of Directors may give feedback or
policy input.
6.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair TENTATIVE
5 min.
Report of the Chair and Vice Chair.
7.Report and Announcements from CRA Staff TENTATIVE
5 min.
The Board may review Board information and announcements. The Board may give
feedback on any item related to City business, including but not limited to:
•Project Updates, and
•Scheduling Items.
D.Written Briefings – the following briefings are informational in nature and
require no action of the Board. Additional information can be provided to the
Board upon request:
1.Informational: Community Reinvestment Agency Semi-
Annual Property Report Written Briefing
-
The Board will receive a written briefing of all Tier 1 and Tier 2 properties owned by the
CRA, as per the Land Disposition Policy. The November 2025 report includes the
description, address, parcel ID, size, zoning, and tier category of each property. In
addition, the report details the approximate acquisition date, current category of
disposition, interim use, and proposed permanent use for each property.
E.Consent – the following items are listed for consideration by the Board and can be
discussed individually upon request. A motion to approve the consent agenda is
approving all of the following items:
NONE.
F.Tentative Closed Session
The Board will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
1.discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of
an individual.
2.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation.
3.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration, or
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms.
4.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
Adjournment
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration, or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms.
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered
for sale, and
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale.
5.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems.
6.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of
the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
G.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m. on _____________________, the undersigned, duly appointed City
Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
KEITH REYNOLDS
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service
711.
Item B1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
TO:CRA Board of Directors
FROM:Kate Werrett, Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:November 18, 2025
RE: Public Hearing CRA Budget Amendment #2 of Fiscal Year 2026
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Board close the public hearing.
Staff note: A follow-up briefing is scheduled immediately after the public hearing in case Board
Members have any additional questions or discussions. The Board may consider adopting the
Budget Amendment during the briefing or at a future meeting.
MOTION 2 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Board continue the public hearing to a future date.
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Submission Date:
09/26/2025
Date Sent to Council:
09/30/2025
From:
Department *
Finance
Employee Name:
Hillier, Randy
E-mail
Randy.Hillier@slc.gov
Department Director Signature
Director Signed Date
09/29/2025
Chief Administrator Officer's Signature
Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
09/29/2025
Subject:
FY25 CRA Budget Amendment #2
Additional Staff Contact:
Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson
Presenters/Staff Table
Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov
Document Type
Resolution
Recommendation:
Discuss and consider the adoption of the proposed second Amendment to the Annual CRA Budget for FY 2025-2026.
Background/Discussion
This amendment proposes the reallocation of $1,890,000 from the Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program within the Depot District and Program Income Fund. Of the $1,890,000, $387,527 is coming from Program Income Fund, with the remainder coming from Depot District Fund. Funds will remain with the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project.Previously, the Board appropriated $4,067,583 to the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project through Budget Amendment 2 FY23-24. An additional $44,857 was appropriated through the FY26 Budget Adoption, totaling $4,112,440 appropriated to the Project. The Project was intended to enable the Agency to begin implementing plans for public improvements in the Rio Grande District (formerly known as Station Center). Funds were designated for public improvements design, site work to prepare Rio Grande District properties for construction, and public improvements construction. Of the total funds appropriated, $2,408,411.77 has not been spent.This amendment will increase the total available in this Project in the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program to $1,890,000 and reduce the total available in the Project in the Infrastructure Improvements Program to $518,411.77. The total Project budget remains the same.
Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Public Hearing
This page has intentionally been left blank
1
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
RESOLUTION NO__________
Second Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE CRA FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2025-2026.
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
(CRA) (formerly known as the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City) Board of Directors
(Board) adopted the final budget of the CRA, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025,
and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 17C-1-601.5 of the Utah
Code.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to amend the CRA's final annual budget have been
accomplished.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Salt Lake
City Community Reinvestment Agency:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to amend the final annual budget of the
CRA, as approved, ratified and finalized by the Board on June 10, 2025.
2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments shown on Exhibit A as “Board
Approved” are hereby adopted and incorporated into the annual budget of the CRA.
3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The Salt Lake City Finance
Department, on behalf of the CRA, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said
budget amendments in the office of the Finance Department, the CRA, and the office of the City
Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2025, to be effective upon adoption.
________________________________
, Chair
Approved as to form: /s/ Jennifer Huntsman_______________
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Jennifer Huntsman
2
The Executive Director:
____ does not request reconsideration
____ requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting
_________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Attest:
_________________________
City Recorder
3
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION
[Attach Board’s Final Approved Budget Amendment]
This page has intentionally been left blank
Project Area
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Reallocation of budget from the Infrastructure Improvements program.Depot District -$ (1,502,473)$ One-time
2 Reallocation of budget to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition program.Depot District 1,502,473 One-time
3 Reallocation of budget from the DD Infrastructure Improvements program.Program Income Fund (387,527) One-time
4 Reallocation of budget to the DD Infrastructure Property Acquisition program.Program Income Fund 387,527 One-time
Total of Budget Amendment Items -$ -$ -$ -$
Redevelopment Agency Depot District -$ One-time
Redevelopment Agency Program Income Fund - One-time
Total of Budget Amendment Items -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Revenue RDA BA #1 Total RDA BA #2 Total RDA BA #3 Total RDA BA #4 Total Total To-Date
Redevelopment Agency 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total of Budget Amendment Items 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total Expense RDA BA #1 Total RDA BA #2 Total RDA BA #3 Total RDA BA #4 Total Total To-Date
Redevelopment Agency 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total of Budget Amendment Items 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2:
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Section F: Donations
Section G: Board Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
Section I: Board Added Items
Section A: New Items
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Fiscal Year 2025-26 CRA Budget Amendment #2
Administration Proposed Board Approved
Initiative Number/Name
Budget Manager
Deputy Director, City Council/RDA Board
Contingent Appropriation and Notes
Certification
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 115 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.CRA.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR RIN ENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY ALZ
Director
STAFF MEMO
DATE: September 26, 2025
PREPARED BY: Baylee White, Financial Analyst
RE: CRA Budget Amendment #2, FY 2025-2026
REQUESTED ACTION: Discuss and consider the adoption of the proposed Second Amendment to the
Annual CRA Budget for Fiscal Year 2026.
BUDGET IMPACTS: The Second Amendment will not change the overall budget total of the Agency
or the Project. Its purpose is to reappropriate funds within the Depot District Infrastructure, Design,
Construction, & Site Work Project from the Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure
Property Acquisition Program. This reallocation is necessary to support the purchase of property to
construct a public right of way.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This amendment proposes the reallocation of $1,890,000 from the
Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program within the
Depot District and Program Income Fund. Of the $1,890,000, $387,527 is coming from Program Income
Fund, with the remainder coming from Depot District Fund. Funds will remain with the Depot District
Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project.
Previously, the Board appropriated $4,067,583 to the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction,
& Site Work Project through Budget Amendment 2 FY23-24. An additional $44,857 was appropriated
through the FY26 Budget Adoption, totaling $4,112,440 appropriated to the Project. The Project was
intended to enable the Agency to begin implementing plans for public improvements in the Rio Grande
District (formerly known as Station Center). Funds were designated for public improvements design, site
work to prepare Rio Grande District properties for construction, and public improvements construction.
Of the total funds appropriated, $2,408,411.77 has not been spent.
This amendment will increase the total available in this Project in the Infrastructure Property Acquisition
Program to $1,890,000 and reduce the total available in the Project in the Infrastructure Improvements
Program to $518,411.77. The total Project budget remains the same.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES: The Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan, endorsed by the CRA
Board of Directors and Mayor Mendenhall in 2024, shows the Rio Grande District as a network of
interconnected rights-of-way and public spaces that prioritize pedestrian experience and safety. Woodbine
Court, aligned across the north and south blocks, is positioned as a central gathering place and focal point
for community gatherings and events.
Reallocation of $1,890,000 to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program enables acquisition of
property for the southern segment of Woodbine Court, which is currently held in private ownership. By
acquiring property to construct the southern segment of Woodbine Court, the CRA secures its future as it
is designed in the Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan. This acquisition will enable the
CRA to further infrastructure and rights-of-way design for the rest of the district.
The acquisition requires demolition of an existing warehouse on site that runs over the future parcel
boundaries of Woodbine Court. The Seller has expressed willingness to demolish the warehouse prior to
closing.
The purchase price of the property is based on a third-party appraisal by a MAI-certified appraiser. The
appraisal includes a consideration of a land swap of 0.15 acres of CRA-owned property of 300 South
frontage that will be deeded to the Seller as part of this transaction. The appraisal compares the value of
the Seller’s property before and after the transaction, resulting in a value difference of $1,890,000 of
value for Woodbine Court.
Commitment to a negotiated purchase price will be contingent upon Board budget approval. Terms of a
Purchase and Sale Agreement are currently being negotiated with the Seller.
Reallocation of Infrastructure Improvement Program
The table below outlines the current appropriations within the Depot District and Program Income Fund
Infrastructure Improvements Program that will be impacted by this amendment. The Agency is requesting
to reallocate $1,612,473 from the Depot District and $387,527 from the Program Income Fund
Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program.
Fund Program Appropriation
Current
Budget Change
Proposed
Budget
Depot Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Depot Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Program
Income Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Total 2,408,411.80 (1,890,000.00) 518,411.80
Proposed Appropriations
The table on the following page outlines the total budget of $1,890,000 allocated to the Infrastructure
Property Acquisition Program from the Infrastructure Improvements Program for the Project.
Fund Program Appropriation
Current
Budget Change
Proposed
Budget
Depot
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Depot
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Program
Income
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Total 0 1,890,000.00 1,890,000.00
Updated Project Appropriations for PRJ-000098 RDA Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction
The following table represents the appropriations for the existing project.
Fund Program Appropriation Proposed Spent Remaining
Budget
Depot
District Infrastructure
Improvements
Improvements-DD [Capital 1,684,527 1,684,527 -
Income Improvements-DD [Capital 19,501 19,501 -
Subtotal
Depot
District
Infrastructure
Improvements Improvements-DD [Capital 518,412 -518,412
Infrastructure
Property
Acquisition
Program
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital 1,457,616 -1,457,616
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital 44,857 -44,857
Program
Income
Fund
Property
Acquisition
RDA-FY23-PIF- Infrastructure
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital
Reserves]
Subtotal 2,408,412
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION:
1. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget Amendment 2.
2. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Supplemental Slides
This page has intentionally been left blank
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The Board of Directors of the Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) of Salt Lake City met
on Tuesday, June 3, 2025.
The following Board Members were present:
Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva
Lopez Chavez
Present Agency Leadership:
Danny Walz – CRA Director, Cara Lindsley – CRA Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Council
Deputy Director, Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Council Deputy
Director, Rachel Otto – Mayor’s Chief of Staff
Present City Staff:
Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Matthew Brown – Deputy
City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of
Staff, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administrative Officer
Director Wharton presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 pm.
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
1
Comments:A.
NONE.
B.Public Hearing - individuals may speak to the Board once per public hearing
topic for two minutes, however written comments are always accepted:
NONE.
C.Community Reinvestment Agency Business - The CRA Board of Directors
will receive information and/or hold discussions and/or take action on:
NONE.
D.Written Briefings – the following briefings are informational in nature and
require no action of the Board. Additional information can be provided to the
Board upon request:
NONE.
E.Consent – the following items are listed for consideration by the Board and can be
discussed individually upon request. A motion to approve the consent agenda is
approving all of the following items:
NONE.
F.Tentative Closed Session
The Board will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
1.discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of
an individual;
2.strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
3.strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property:
(i)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
2
(ii)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
4.strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i)public discussion of the transaction would:
(A)disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B)prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible
terms;
(ii)the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered
for sale; and<
(iii)the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale
5.discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
6.investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of
the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
Closed Session started at 5:49 PM
Held in the Work Session Room (location) and online via Zoom
Board Members in Attendance: Sara Young, Victoria Petro, Chris Wharton, Dan Dugan, Darin
Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez, Alejandro Puy
City Staff in Attendance: Lindsey Nikola, Megan Yuill, Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Nick
Tarbet, Mark Kittrell, Cindy Lou Trishman, Danny Walz, Mary Beth Thompson, Cara Lindsley,
Ashley Ogden, Tauni Barker, Lauren Parisi, Taylee Foulger, Tracy Tran, Austin Kimmel, Allison
Rowland, Tammy Hunsaker, Jennifer Huntsman, Whitney Gonzalez Fernandez, Kelsey
Lindquist, Thais Stewart, Matt Brown
Attendance online via Zoom: Rachel Otto
Closed Session ended at 6:49 PM
Motion:
Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Puy to enter into Closed Session
for the purposes of strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent
litigation; and for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah
Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent
requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Eva Lopez
Chavez, Darin Mano
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
Motion:
Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Dugan to exit Closed Session.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Eva Lopez
Chavez, Darin Mano
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
3
Adjournment
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
G.
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
4
Meeting adjourned at 6:49 pm.
Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano
_______________________________
City Recorder – Keith Reynolds
Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council
Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments
submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may
not remain active indefinitely.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the Salt Lake
City Community Reinvestment Agency meeting held Tuesday, June 3, 2025 and is not intended
to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to
Utah Code §52-4-203.
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
Tuesday, June 3, 2025
5
PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED
The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City
Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 10, 2025.
The following Board Directors/Council Members were present:
Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva
Lopez Chavez
Present Legislative leadership:
Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy
Director
Present Administrative leadership:
Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff
Present City Staff:
Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Matthew Brown- Deputy City
Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder,
Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant
Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
1
LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING
A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building
Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the
Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal
Year 2025-26.
The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt
services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout
the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool
for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better
interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street
projects.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Wharton to
approve Resolution 2 of 2025, adopting the Final Budget for Fiscal Year
2025-26 of the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
2
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young
ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
C.LBA ADJOURNMENT:
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adjourn as the Local Building Authority and convene as the Community
Reinvestment Agency.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young
ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
3
SALT LAKE CITY
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
D.CRA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake
City for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the
Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Dugan to adopt Resolution
10 of 2025, approving the Fiscal Year 2026 CRA Budget reflected in the
attached Key Changes spreadsheet.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young
ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:
Motion:
Moved by Director Wharton, seconded by Director Mano to adjourn as the
Community Reinvestment Agency and convene as the Salt Lake City Council.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
4
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young
ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
5
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor
Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2025 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake
City.
Summary:
Council Member Puy read the Resolution.
Stacy Smith (Car Show Coordinator, Juneteenth Festival Event) was present to accept
the Resolution.
Council Member Lopez Chavez arrived during this agenda item.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez
Chavez to adopt Joint Resolution 15 of 2025, recognizing June 19, 2025 as
Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
NONE.
H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
Ordinances and Resolutions listed below (H1 – H15) are associated with
the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake
City, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more
information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
6
1.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the
Budget for the Library Fund
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City,
Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the
employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Ordinance 32 of 2025, approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2025-26
budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing
document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the
Library Fund, including the contingent appropriations as listed on the
motion sheet under Motion #2, Items A and B.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
2.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah
for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library
Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
7
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member
Young to adopt Ordinance 31 of 2025, approving the budget for the Library
Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
3.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library
Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including
the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City
made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to
adopt Ordinance 33 of 2025, setting the final rate of tax levy, including the
final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within
Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as listed on the
motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary
documentation for the State Tax Commission. The Council has asked the
Attorney’s Office to work with the State Tax Commission and Attorneys to
review the recent tax advice regarding the library budget, understanding the
new advice combining the Library and City as one tax entity, to outline its
impacts to both the Library and City budgets and changes to policy
oversight.
A tax of 0.003180 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which:
A. 0.002130 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating
$108,006,905 of ongoing revenue; and
B. 0.000011 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year
adjustment generating $579,167 of one-time revenue; and
C. 0.000630 shall be credited as revenue in the Library Fund, generating
$31,945,704 of ongoing revenue; and
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
8
D. 0.000328 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds,
generating $16,634,258 of ongoing revenue; and
E. 0.000081 shall be credited as revenue in the Governmental Immunity Fund for
tort liability, generating $4,107,305 of ongoing revenue.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
4.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee
information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 34 of 2025, amending various fees and fee information set
forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. (Items H4 through
H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote
details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
5.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers and
Executive Municipal Officers
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment
for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
9
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 35 of 2025, approving a compensation adjustment for
elected and statutory officers and executive municiple officers of Salt Lake
City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6.
See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
6.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt
Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all
non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 37 of 2025, approving a compensation plan for all non-
represented employees of Salt Lake City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15
were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
7.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an
MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
10
implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation
of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible
employees.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 36 of 2025, appropriating necessary funds to implement,
for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the American Federation
of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004,
representing eligible employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were
approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
8.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the
MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of
Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to
implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
11
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 38 of 2025, appropriating the necessary funds to
implement for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the International
Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible
employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of
Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
9.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of
the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City
owned motor vehicles.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 39 of 2025, amending Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City
Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned
motor vehicles. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of
Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
10.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140,
12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time
frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
12
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 40 of 2025, amending Sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150,
12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time
frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking
enforcement. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of
Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
11.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public
Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt
Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services
and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 41 of 2025, amending Sections of the Salt Lake City Code
pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and
the Department of Community and Neighborhoods. (Items H4 through H13
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
13
and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote
details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
12.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the
Sustainability Department
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend section 2.08.120 of
the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the
Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the
last annual budget.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
defer this item to a future meeting date.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
13.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Complying with Rate Study and Regulatory
Requirements
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Chapter 17 of the
Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align
with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply
with regulatory requirements.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
14
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinance 42 of 2025, amending Chapter 17 of the Salt Lake City
Code, complying with rate study and regulatory requirements. (Items H4
through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for
final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
14.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program
The Council will consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the
Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or
renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures.
Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The
Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget
process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar
year.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June
3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19,
2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to
adopt $55,806,110 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING
$13,489,253 in funding as shown on the motion sheet. Later this year, the
Council will consider CIP project-specific allocations.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
15
15.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit
Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes
Implementation
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter
into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement
2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to
arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900
South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in
2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in
the City’s Transit Master Plan.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - TBD
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday,
June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Ordinances A-K as shown on the Motion Sheet relating to the Fiscal
Year 2025-26 budget, with the exception of Item I, Ordinance: Amending
Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department,
which will be deferred to a future meeting date.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to
adopt Resolution 17 of 2025, authorizing the Mayor to enter into the
proposed addendum No. 9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to
implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. (Items H4
through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for
final vote details.)
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Young to
adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet
under Motion 5, Items 1 through 10.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
16
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
I.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
There were no questions.
2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to
comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person
will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)
Public Comments:
Council Member Puy reiterated the rules of decorum.
Cheneil Hill spoke regarding a proposed Sex Offender Registry Violation Act, the
importance of its passage by State Legislators, and asked for the Council for their support
on the matter.
Scott Bates, on behalf of the Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation, expressed
appreciation for the City’s cooperation with the rezone in connection with the recent
annexation process for the Northpointe area.
Mark Harousseau spoke to a dangerous intersection in his neighborhood (location
inaudible) and urged the Council to support the installation of a hawk signal to enhance
safety for pedestrians.
Abdirizak Ibrahim spoke to issues facing the Westside of the City such as lack of
affordable family-sized housing, no hospital, and no high school in the Glendale
neighborhood.
Lisia Satini spoke to issues facing the Westside, including safety, homelessness,
healthcare (lack of hospital), and asked the Council for additional support for refugee
communities of color on the Westside of the City.
Council Remarks:
Council Member Young addressed the request/need for a hawk signal at the dangerous
intersection and said many neighbors had voiced concerns, options were being reviewed,
and described looking forward to further conversation regarding the issue.
J.NEW BUSINESS:
NONE.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
17
K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1.Ordinance: Northpoint Area Annexation
The Council will consider adopting an ordinance annexing certain unincorporated
properties North-Northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake
County border with Davis County.
For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/NorthpointAnnexationSLC.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez
to adopt Ordinance 43 of 2025, annexing certain unincorporated properties
north-northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake
County border with Davis County pursuant to ordinance and maps included
in Attachment A. I further move the Council adopt a Legislative Action
requesting the administration to review the property at approximately 2699
West 3300 North for potential rezoning to M1-A.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah
Young, Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
L.CONSENT:
1.Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment for Public Hearing Requirements for
Appeals and Variances
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the
Salt Lake City Code relating to public hearing requirements for appeals and variances.
The proposal makes the necessary changes to comply with House Bill 368 (HB368),
adopted by the Utah Legislature in 2025 and went into effect on May 7, 2025. One part of
HB368 prohibits cities from holding a public hearing for any appeals of a land use
decision and requests for variances. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00327.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
18
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
2.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program
The Council will set the date for Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of
buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have
a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt
service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-
specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June
3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19,
2025
Staff Recommendation - Set date.
3.Board Appointment: Airport Board – Jonathan Freedman
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jonathan Freedman to the
Airport Board for a term ending June 10, 2029.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
19
4.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement
Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Jenny Bonk
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jenny Bonk to the CDCIP
Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
5.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement
Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Brad Christensen
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Brad Christensen to the CDCIP
Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing - n/a
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025
Staff Recommendation - Approve.
Motion:
Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to
approve the Consent Agenda.
AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young,
Eva Lopez Chavez
Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass
M.ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting adjourned at 7:36 pm.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
20
Council Minutes Approved:
CRA Minutes Approved:
LBA Minutes Approved:
_______________________________
City Council Chair – Chris Wharton
_______________________________
Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano
_______________________________
Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton
_______________________________
City Recorder – Keith Reynolds
Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council
Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments
submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may
not remain active indefinitely.
This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City
Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a
full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code
§52-4-203.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Tuesday, June 10, 2025
21
Item C2
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
TO:CRA Board of Directors
FROM:Kate Werrett, Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:November 18, 2025
RE: RDA Budget Amendment #2 of Fiscal Year 2026
MOTION 1 – ADOPT
I move that the Board adopt a resolution approving the second amendment of the Fiscal Year 2026
budget of the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Board proceed to the next agenda item.
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Submission Date:
09/26/2025
Date Sent to Council:
09/30/2025
From:
Department *
Finance
Employee Name:
Hillier, Randy
E-mail
Randy.Hillier@slc.gov
Department Director Signature
Director Signed Date
09/29/2025
Chief Administrator Officer's Signature
Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date
09/29/2025
Subject:
FY25 CRA Budget Amendment #2
Additional Staff Contact:
Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson
Presenters/Staff Table
Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov
Document Type
Resolution
Recommendation:
Discuss and consider the adoption of the proposed second Amendment to the Annual CRA Budget for FY 2025-2026.
Background/Discussion
This amendment proposes the reallocation of $1,890,000 from the Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program within the Depot District and Program Income Fund. Of the $1,890,000, $387,527 is coming from Program Income Fund, with the remainder coming from Depot District Fund. Funds will remain with the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project.Previously, the Board appropriated $4,067,583 to the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project through Budget Amendment 2 FY23-24. An additional $44,857 was appropriated through the FY26 Budget Adoption, totaling $4,112,440 appropriated to the Project. The Project was intended to enable the Agency to begin implementing plans for public improvements in the Rio Grande District (formerly known as Station Center). Funds were designated for public improvements design, site work to prepare Rio Grande District properties for construction, and public improvements construction. Of the total funds appropriated, $2,408,411.77 has not been spent.This amendment will increase the total available in this Project in the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program to $1,890,000 and reduce the total available in the Project in the Infrastructure Improvements Program to $518,411.77. The total Project budget remains the same.
Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
Public Hearing
This page has intentionally been left blank
1
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
RESOLUTION NO__________
Second Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT AGENCY AMENDING THE FINAL BUDGET OF THE CRA FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2025-2026.
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
(CRA) (formerly known as the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City) Board of Directors
(Board) adopted the final budget of the CRA, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025,
and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 17C-1-601.5 of the Utah
Code.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to amend the CRA's final annual budget have been
accomplished.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Salt Lake
City Community Reinvestment Agency:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to amend the final annual budget of the
CRA, as approved, ratified and finalized by the Board on June 10, 2025.
2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments shown on Exhibit A as “Board
Approved” are hereby adopted and incorporated into the annual budget of the CRA.
3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The Salt Lake City Finance
Department, on behalf of the CRA, is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said
budget amendments in the office of the Finance Department, the CRA, and the office of the City
Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
Passed by the Board of Directors of the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2025, to be effective upon adoption.
________________________________
, Chair
Approved as to form: /s/ Jennifer Huntsman_______________
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Jennifer Huntsman
2
The Executive Director:
____ does not request reconsideration
____ requests reconsideration at the next regular Agency meeting
_________________________________
Erin Mendenhall, Executive Director
Attest:
_________________________
City Recorder
3
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION
[Attach Board’s Final Approved Budget Amendment]
This page has intentionally been left blank
Project Area
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Revenue
Amount
Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Reallocation of budget from the Infrastructure Improvements program.Depot District -$ (1,502,473)$ One-time
2 Reallocation of budget to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition program.Depot District 1,502,473 One-time
3 Reallocation of budget from the DD Infrastructure Improvements program.Program Income Fund (387,527) One-time
4 Reallocation of budget to the DD Infrastructure Property Acquisition program.Program Income Fund 387,527 One-time
Total of Budget Amendment Items -$ -$ -$ -$
Redevelopment Agency Depot District -$ One-time
Redevelopment Agency Program Income Fund - One-time
Total of Budget Amendment Items -$ -$ -$ -$
Total Revenue RDA BA #1 Total RDA BA #2 Total RDA BA #3 Total RDA BA #4 Total Total To-Date
Redevelopment Agency 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total of Budget Amendment Items 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total Expense RDA BA #1 Total RDA BA #2 Total RDA BA #3 Total RDA BA #4 Total Total To-Date
Redevelopment Agency 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total of Budget Amendment Items 86,036,232$ - - - - $ 86,036,232
Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2:
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
Section F: Donations
Section G: Board Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
Section I: Board Added Items
Section A: New Items
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Fiscal Year 2025-26 CRA Budget Amendment #2
Administration Proposed Board Approved
Initiative Number/Name
Budget Manager
Deputy Director, City Council/RDA Board
Contingent Appropriation and Notes
Certification
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 115 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.CRA.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR RIN ENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY ALZ
Director
STAFF MEMO
DATE: September 26, 2025
PREPARED BY: Baylee White, Financial Analyst
RE: CRA Budget Amendment #2, FY 2025-2026
REQUESTED ACTION: Discuss and consider the adoption of the proposed Second Amendment to the
Annual CRA Budget for Fiscal Year 2026.
BUDGET IMPACTS: The Second Amendment will not change the overall budget total of the Agency
or the Project. Its purpose is to reappropriate funds within the Depot District Infrastructure, Design,
Construction, & Site Work Project from the Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure
Property Acquisition Program. This reallocation is necessary to support the purchase of property to
construct a public right of way.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This amendment proposes the reallocation of $1,890,000 from the
Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program within the
Depot District and Program Income Fund. Of the $1,890,000, $387,527 is coming from Program Income
Fund, with the remainder coming from Depot District Fund. Funds will remain with the Depot District
Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work Project.
Previously, the Board appropriated $4,067,583 to the Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction,
& Site Work Project through Budget Amendment 2 FY23-24. An additional $44,857 was appropriated
through the FY26 Budget Adoption, totaling $4,112,440 appropriated to the Project. The Project was
intended to enable the Agency to begin implementing plans for public improvements in the Rio Grande
District (formerly known as Station Center). Funds were designated for public improvements design, site
work to prepare Rio Grande District properties for construction, and public improvements construction.
Of the total funds appropriated, $2,408,411.77 has not been spent.
This amendment will increase the total available in this Project in the Infrastructure Property Acquisition
Program to $1,890,000 and reduce the total available in the Project in the Infrastructure Improvements
Program to $518,411.77. The total Project budget remains the same.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES: The Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan, endorsed by the CRA
Board of Directors and Mayor Mendenhall in 2024, shows the Rio Grande District as a network of
interconnected rights-of-way and public spaces that prioritize pedestrian experience and safety. Woodbine
Court, aligned across the north and south blocks, is positioned as a central gathering place and focal point
for community gatherings and events.
Reallocation of $1,890,000 to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program enables acquisition of
property for the southern segment of Woodbine Court, which is currently held in private ownership. By
acquiring property to construct the southern segment of Woodbine Court, the CRA secures its future as it
is designed in the Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan. This acquisition will enable the
CRA to further infrastructure and rights-of-way design for the rest of the district.
The acquisition requires demolition of an existing warehouse on site that runs over the future parcel
boundaries of Woodbine Court. The Seller has expressed willingness to demolish the warehouse prior to
closing.
The purchase price of the property is based on a third-party appraisal by a MAI-certified appraiser. The
appraisal includes a consideration of a land swap of 0.15 acres of CRA-owned property of 300 South
frontage that will be deeded to the Seller as part of this transaction. The appraisal compares the value of
the Seller’s property before and after the transaction, resulting in a value difference of $1,890,000 of
value for Woodbine Court.
Commitment to a negotiated purchase price will be contingent upon Board budget approval. Terms of a
Purchase and Sale Agreement are currently being negotiated with the Seller.
Reallocation of Infrastructure Improvement Program
The table below outlines the current appropriations within the Depot District and Program Income Fund
Infrastructure Improvements Program that will be impacted by this amendment. The Agency is requesting
to reallocate $1,612,473 from the Depot District and $387,527 from the Program Income Fund
Infrastructure Improvements Program to the Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program.
Fund Program Appropriation
Current
Budget Change
Proposed
Budget
Depot Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Depot Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Program
Income Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Improvements-DD
Total 2,408,411.80 (1,890,000.00) 518,411.80
Proposed Appropriations
The table on the following page outlines the total budget of $1,890,000 allocated to the Infrastructure
Property Acquisition Program from the Infrastructure Improvements Program for the Project.
Fund Program Appropriation
Current
Budget Change
Proposed
Budget
Depot
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Depot
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Program
Income
Property
Acquisition
Infrastructure Property
Acquisition-DD
Total 0 1,890,000.00 1,890,000.00
Updated Project Appropriations for PRJ-000098 RDA Depot District Infrastructure, Design, Construction
The following table represents the appropriations for the existing project.
Fund Program Appropriation Proposed Spent Remaining
Budget
Depot
District Infrastructure
Improvements
Improvements-DD [Capital 1,684,527 1,684,527 -
Income Improvements-DD [Capital 19,501 19,501 -
Subtotal
Depot
District
Infrastructure
Improvements Improvements-DD [Capital 518,412 -518,412
Infrastructure
Property
Acquisition
Program
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital 1,457,616 -1,457,616
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital 44,857 -44,857
Program
Income
Fund
Property
Acquisition
RDA-FY23-PIF- Infrastructure
Property Acquisition-DD [Capital
Reserves]
Subtotal 2,408,412
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION:
1. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Budget Amendment 2.
2. Approval of the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Supplemental Slides
This page has intentionally been left blank
BUDGET AMENDMENT #2
OCTOBER 2025
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
•The CRA’s Budget Amendment #2 contemplates a reallocation of existing funds.
•The request is to reallocate funds from the Infrastructure Improvements fund to the
Infrastructure Property Acquisition fund, which is a more appropriate program for
acquisition of property.
•All funds discussed are staying within the same project (PRJ-000098 Depot District
Infrastructure, Design, Construction, & Site Work) – no funds are being removed or
added to the project.
•The original intent of the project was to support public improvement design, site work to
prepare Station Center properties for construction, and public improvements
construction.
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
•The Board allocated $4,067,583 to PRJ-000098 previously, with an additional $44,857
allocated through the FY26 budget. The project budget totals $4,112,440.
•Of the total funds appropriated, $2,408,411.77 has not been encumbered or spent.
•The acquisition proposed through this amendment allows the CRA to further
infrastructure and rights-of-way design, in line with the original project approval.
•An amendment is requested as the original program funding allocation (Infrastructure
Improvements Program) is less appropriate for property acquisition than the proposed
funding (Infrastructure Property Acquisition Program).
CURRENT VS PROPOSED PROJECT BUDGET
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
PRJ-000098 RDA – Depot District Infrastructure
Improvements Program
Current Project Budget : $2,020,884.80
RDA-FY24-DD-Infrastructure Improvements-DD [Capital
Reserves]: $1,976,027.80
CRA-FY26-DD-Infrastructure Improvements-DD [Capital
Reserves]: $44,857.00
PRJ-000098 RDA Program Income Fund
Infrastructure Improvements:
Current Project Budget: $387,527
RDA-FY23-PIF-Infrastructure Improvements-DD [Capital
Reserves]: $387,527.00
PRJ-000098 RDA – Depot District Infrastructure Improvements
Program
Proposed Project Budget : $518,411.80
RDA-FY24-DD-Infrastructure Improvements-DD [Capital Reserves]:
$518,411.80
PRJ-000098 RDA – Depot District Infrastructure Property
Acquisition Program
Proposed Project Budget : $1,502,473.00
RDA-FY24-DD- Infrastructure Property Acquisition-DD [Capital Reserves]:
$1,457,616.00
CRA-FY26-DD- Infrastructure Property Acquisition-DD [Capital Reserves]:
$44,857.00
PRJ-000098 RDA Program Income Fund Infrastructure Property
Acquisition:
Proposed Project Budget: $387,527
RDA-FY23-PIF-Infrastructure Property Acquisition-DD [Capital Reserves]:
$387,527.00
WORKDAY WORKTAGS & THE CRA BUDGET
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Appropriation
Cost Center FundFiscal Year Program Region
Worktags allow for tracking of costs, revenues, and other operational metrics across different dimensions like departments, projects, or geographic
locations. The Redevelopment Agency’s budget utilizes the following Worktags:
Cost Center: Represents a specific department, unit, or division within an organization that is responsible for certain costs. The RDA i s a cost center.
Fiscal Year: The original year the funds were appropriated.
Fund: Used to categorize and segregate financial transactions based on the origin of the funds, which is crucial for accurate financial reporting and compliance. The
RDA has Project Area, Housing, Multi-Use, and Operations funds, with various legal and policy-related requirements that need to be monitored.
Program: Enables the segregation and monitoring of financial data, which represents a specific pool of money that needs to be tracked for various legal, policy, or
Board-directed initiatives related to RDA programs. The Program Worktags are designed to fit within program hierarchies such as Housing, Commercial, Infrastructure,
and Operations programs.
Region: Segments expenses based on location, which for the RDA is usually a Project Area. Not all expenses will be associated with a project area, which means this
Worktag may not always be used.
Appropriation: Combines the elements of Cost Center, Fund, Program, and Region into a single, comprehensive identifier, with the fiscal year as a prefix.
APPROPRIATIONS & PROJECT BUDGETS
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Each appropriation supports either the operations of the Agency or projects associated with its
various programs.
Operations Appropriations
Annual appropriations for operational
expenses. Considered approved to
spend when appropriated. If not spent or
encumbered by the end of the fiscal year,
drops to fund balance. Typically, these
would be for RDA operating expenses.
Occasionally may be associated with a
project budget (for example, an office
remodel).
Capital Reserves Appropriations
Appropriations for programs that carry
forward each year. For instance, in the
Housing Development Loan Program,
a set amount is allocated for loans.
Staff will request additional Board
approval to use these funds for specific
loan projects. Funds not awarded to
projects roll forward to the next year,
unless reappropriated by the Board.
Project Budgets
All project budgets must pull
from appropriations. Once project
budgets have been approved by
the Board, the Agency can move
forward with spending. Project
budgets may have multiple
appropriations.
AGENCY FUNDS
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Project Area Funds
Must be used within the boundaries of the project area, except for
revenues transferred to Primary Housing (legally required),
Secondary Housing (supplemental), Agency Operations (defined
by interlocal agreements), or other legal reasons.
•Central Business District (CBD)
•Block 70 (B70)
•Depot District (DD)
•Granary District (GD)
•North Temple (NT)
•North Temple Viaduct (NTV)
•Stadler Rail (SR)
•Northwest Quadrant (NWQ)
•State Street (SS)
•9 Line (9L)
•Block 67 North (B67N)
Housing Funds
May be used anywhere in the City, unless otherwise directed by
the Board, except for the WCI, which must be used west of I-15.
•Primary Housing (1H)
•Secondary Housing (2H)
•Housing Development Fund (HDF)
•West Side Community Initiative (WCI)
Multi-Use Funds
Can be used across project areas (and potentially city-wide),
unless otherwise directed by the Board.
•Program Income Fund (PIF)
•Revolving Loan Fund (RLF)
Agency Operations Fund (OPS)
•Receives transfers in from other funds to fund the Agency’s
operational expenses.
THANK YOU
Tier 1 Property
Pre-disposition Report
November 18, 2025
Austin Taylor, CRA Project Manager
Property Type: Tier 1
Project Area: Depot
Location: 100 South between 600 West
and Dansie Drive
Acreage: 2.33
Current Use: vacant house and barn,
occupied self-storage
Zoning: Gateway Mixed Use (G-MU)
Past Planning Work
1998
Depot District Project Area Plan
2016
Downtown Master Plan
2019
Salt Lake Central Station Area
Plan
2024
100 South Design Workshop (Rio
Grande District Plan)
2024
Salt Lake Central HTRZ
Application
Redevelopment
Proposal
Timeline
Release land sale RFP2025 Q4
Review and rank proposals2026 Q1
Select development partner and enter into exclusive
negotiations2026 Q2
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:
Community Reinvestment Agency Chair
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Submission Date:
10/31/2025
Date Sent to Council:
11/04/2025
From:
Department *
Community Reinvestment Agency
Employee Name:
Stine, Robyn
E-mail
robyn.stine@slc.gov
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signature
Mayor's Office Chief of Staff Signature
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signed Date
10/31/2025
Chief of Staff's Signed Date
11/04/2025
Subject:
Pre-Disposition Report for Tier 1 Property
Additional Staff Contact:
Austin Taylor, austin.taylor@slc.gov
Presenters/Staff Table
Document Type
Information Item
Budget Impact?
Yes
No
Recommendation:
Provide input for the proposed reuse plan of CRA property
Background/Discussion
The CRA is proposing to sell 2.33 acres of land located on 100 South between 600 West and Dansie Drive. The CRA proposes to sell it for a redevelopment project that will include housing, artist spaces, and urban farming.
Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 115 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.SLCCRA.COM
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY WALZ
Director
STAFF MEMO
DATE: October 31, 2025
PREPARED BY: Austin Taylor, Project Manager
RE: Pre-Disposition Report for Tier 1 Property located on 100 South between 600
West and Dansie Drive
REQUESTED ACTION: Briefing; no action requested
POLICY ITEM: Property disposition
BUDGET IMPACTS: Not applicable
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In accordance with the Real Property Disposition Policy that was adopted on March 23, 2021, when
disposing of Tier 1 property, the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) is required to
provide an update to the Board of Directors (Board) at the following stages of the disposition process:
pre-disposition (prior to marketing the property), developer selection, and development agreement.
The information provided in Attachment A is intended to serve as a Pre-Disposition Report for a Tier 1
property located on 100 South between 600 West and Dansie Drive (Property) in the Depot District
Project Area. The report provides an update to the Board as to the Property’s reuse plan, the method of
disposition, timeline of disposition, as well as other information relevant to the disposition of the
Property.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES:
Refer to Attachment A for a Pre-Disposition Report for Tier 1 property located on 100 South between 600
West and Dansie Drive in the Depot District Project Area.
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION: None
ATTACHMENTS:
A.Tier 1 Property Pre-Disposition Report
Attachment A
TIER 1 PROPERTY PRE-DISPOSITION REPORT
Property located on 100 South between 600 West and Dansie Drive
The following information serves as a pre-disposition report for the lease of Tier 1 Property located on
100 South between 600 West and Dansie Drive The report includes the Property’s reuse plan, method of
disposition, timeline of disposition, and other information relevant to the disposition of the Property.
PROPERTY OVERVIEW
Address: The site consists of ten parcels with the following addresses: 42 South 600 West, 622 West 100
South, 624 West 100 South, 628 West 100 South, 632 West 100 South, 636 West 100 South, 648 West
100 South, 650 West 100 South, 652 West 100 South, and 662 West 100 South.
Size and Current Uses:
• 2.33 acres of land
• 648 West 100 South contains a single-story self-storage building that is currently occupied
• 42 South 600 West contains a single-family home with a detached barn; both buildings are vacant
and scheduled to be demolished
Project Area: Depot District (expired), Salt Lake Central Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone
(HTRZ)
Property Type: Tier 1
Zoning: Gateway Mixed Use (G-MU)
PROPOSED REUSE
Mid-rise Mixed-use Development
CRA staff proposes seeking a mid-rise, mixed-use development on this site. This site is zoned Gateway
Mixed Use (G-MU), which allows building heights of 75 to 180 feet. Given current construction costs
and comparable real estate revenues, the most likely building type to be constructed here is a mid-rise
“podium” wood-framed over concrete building. This is the prevailing building type in the immediate
neighborhood and allows for a mix of uses within one building.
Housing Requirement
CRA staff proposes that housing be required on this property. Since the G-MU zoning has a minimum
height of 75 feet, developments here will likely need to be at least 7 stories tall. Given the current office
economy and permitted uses in the G-MU zone, housing, hotel, or self-storage are the most likely uses of
building space above the street level. CRA staff prefers housing because this land is included in our plans
to meet the required housing density in our recently approved Salt Lake Central HTRZ. This use also
brings more life and taxable value than self-storage. CRA will prioritize projects with housing that is
family-sized and/or for sale.
Arts Requirement
CRA staff proposes a requirement of artist space at street level on this site. The area is already home to a
high concentration of artist spaces, including the Utah Arts Alliance campus, Metro Music Hall, The
Complex, Urban Arts Gallery, and Artspace properties. Previous planning efforts, design workshops, and
individual meetings with stakeholders and property owners in this neighborhood revealed a preference for
continued concentration of artist spaces in this area. CRA proposes prioritizing art studios, galleries, and
performance venues in the street-level building area on this property.
Urban Farming Preference
CRA staff proposes a preference for vertical farming into the future development on the property. This
site was used for gardening beginning in the 1990s and was previously home to one of Wasatch
Community Gardens’ largest urban farms, the Green Phoenix Farm. Since the site is adjacent to railroad
tracks and a freeway, hosting vertical farming on the property could provide a screen from ambient noise
and pay homage to the site’s history as a successful urban farm. There are “vertical farms” in urban areas
throughout the world which provide a model of urban farming that could succeed here.
PROPOSED METHOD OF DISPOSITION
Public Land Sale RFP
CRA staff proposes releasing a public land sale RFP soliciting best offers and redevelopment plans for
the property. After a public solicitation period of 90 days, CRA staff will rank proposals based on their
ability to meet City goals. CRA staff will present the top proposal to the Mayor for ratification and to the
Board for information. The CRA will then enter into exclusive negotiations with the chosen developer,
create a development agreement, and inform the Mayor and Board of the agreement. The CRA will sell
the land once the developer is ready to begin construction.
CRA staff believes the market value of this land is approximately $13.7M (or $135 per square foot) and
proposes that this be the asking price. The CRA proposes selling this land—rather than leasing it—to
fund immediate infrastructure needs in the Rio Grande District.
Adjacent property owners to the west of our property are interested in selling. The CRA may publicize the
opportunity to purchase these properties along with ours at the owners’ request.
ESTIMATED TIMELINE
The CRA proposes to implement this disposition plan under the following timeline:
Q4 2025: Release land sale RFP
Q1 2026: Review and rank proposals
Q1 2026: Select development partner and enter into exclusive negotiations
ATTACHMENTS
A: Relevant Pages from Depot District Project Area Plan (1998)
B: Relevant Pages from Downtown Master Plan (2016)
C: Relevant Pages from Salt Lake Central Station Ara Plan (2019)
D: 100 South Design Workshop (2024)
E: Relevant Pages from Salt Lake Central HTRZ Application (2024)
DOWNTOWN’S STORY FROM TOMORROWDOWNTOWN PLAN
ADOPTED May 24, 2016 A DOWNTOWN FOR ALL AGESWWW.DOWNTOWNPLANSLC.COM
A VISION AND POLICY PLAN PROMOTING DOWNTOWN SALT LAKE CITY
AS AN INTERNATIONALLY-RECOGNIZED DESTINATION AND A VIBRANT NEIGHBORHOOD
DEFINED BY MOUNTAIN BEAUTY AND THE BEST QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE COUNTRY
THE
104 STORY FROM TOMORROW
The future of the Depot District is a dense
urban neighborhood that provides a full range
of housing options and is served by all modes
of transit. The Depot District is home to major
destinations, including the energy solutions
arena, Gateway mall, BYu salt lake campus
and the lDs Business college. the area could
easily be the location of a major job center,
such as an urban oriented technology center
or research park (also see Grand Boulevards
District).
celebrated in the Depot District is a mix
of historic and new buildings. The historic
buildings establish the district’s character and
represent the past industrial use of the area.
New construction complements the historic
buildings, respecting street and site patterns,
building placement, site access, and building
form and scale. The spaces left over from the
presence of the railroad allow for new mid-block,
small scale streets, alleys and walkways that
are well designed and function for all users. The
walkways connect to interesting spaces, both
private and public.
The area is home to many community service
providers that care for and help our most at risk
populations. as such, public safety and security
are critical to the needs of all those who live,
work, shop or are served in the neighborhood.
Service providers operate in a manner that
reduces their impact on the neighborhood and
aesthetically fit the character of the district.
DEPOT DISTRICT
SOUTH TEMPLE
NORTH TEMPLE
100 SOUTH
200 SOUTH
300 SOUTH
400 SOUTH
500 SOUTH
600 SOUTH
700 SOUTH
60
0
W
E
S
T
50
0
W
E
S
T
40
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
CITY &
COUNTY
BUILDING
CITY
FLEET
BLOCK
LIBRARY
SQUARE
GALLIVAN
PLAZA
SALT
PALACE
ENERGY
SOLUTIONS
ARENA
UNION
PACIFIC
DEPOT
TEMPLE
SQUARE
PIONEER
PARK
RIO
GRANDE
DEPOT
Our Vision:
urban research park
traX extensions
identified in Downtown
in Motion
Proposed Downtown
Streetcar Preferred
route
leGeND
existing traX lines
& stations
proposed mid-block
Walkways
opportunity site
entrance
Landmarks
Green loop/park
District
existing frontrunner
lines & stations
A compLete urbAn neIghborhooD
105SALT LAKE CITY | DOWNTOWN COMMUNITY PLANDISTRICTS
...provIDeS houSIng choIce
...IS vIbrAnt & ActIve
...IS proSperouS
...foSterS equIt Y & opportunIt Y
...IS connecteD
...IS WALKAbLe
...IS WeLcomIng & SAfe
...unIteS cIt Y & nAture
...IS beAutIfuL
• establish a year-round farmer's market.
• explore potential locations for a major sports venue with good transit
connections.
• Develop a skateboard park along the eastern edge of I-15.
• encourage active use of the public realm surrounding energy solutions
arena to foster a vibrant sports and entertainment center.
• animate the public realm in and around pioneer park for all people.
• Utilize interior streets and walkways for townhouse development to
activate interior of blocks while keeping main streets commercial.
• encourage development of/create incentives for housing for families
with children, as part of identifiable neighborhood areas, in ground-
oriented or low-rise dense developments and close to open space,
schools, childcare centers, community facilities and other amenities
designed for children; and smaller suites should be in towers and/or in
spaces above busy commercial areas.
• Utilize interior streets and walkways for townhouse development to
activate interior of blocks while keeping main streets commercial.
• embrace the utah jazz and energy solutions arena as a major
generator of downtown activity through support of synergistic
development near the arena.
• address barriers (I-15, railroad tracks, bridges, etc.) between
Guadalupe, West Salt Lake and downtown through public realm,
transit, and development improvements.
• Develop strategies that will help integrate social service facilities into
the social and physical fabric of the Depot District.
• extend the red line along 400 s directly to central station from the
University of Utah.
• partner with energy solutions arena to create a comprehensive
strategy for arena access and events, including staging for events,
parking and traffic management.
• encourage development of small neighborhood service nodes.
• consider economic development tools for small neighborhood retail
(i.e. coffee shops, book stores, bodegas, small grocery stores).
• establish new dog park facilities in key locations near housing.
• address barriers to walking routes, such as through public buildings like
the rio Grande Depot.
• maximize visual transparency from sidewalk into stores and vice versa,
including lighting for optimal nighttime light spill and daytime solar
shading to enhance the safety and quality of the pedestrian experience.
Window displays that stimulate interest in products or services is
encouraged.
• Work with uta and other partners to extend all transit operating hours
for early morning and late evening travelers.
• establish downtown as a dog-friendly neighborhood with housing that
allows pets and dog-oriented amenities in the public realm to increase
pedestrian activity downtown throughout the day and night.
• Improve public safety in the Depot District, particularly around pioneer
Park, for the enjoyment of all.
• establish a significant urban forest along the edge of I-15 to help
address emissions issues and mask I-15 from view.
• Investigate burying powerlines along major streets and corridors,
particularly at entrances to the downtown.
Depot DIStrIct
Depot DIStrIct InItIAtIveS
leGeND
29 May 2019
Central Station Area
Plan
Salt Lake City, Utah
CENTRAL STATION AREA PLAN18
WHAT WE HEARD
WE ASKED 3 QUESTIONS
1.What are the strengths of the sites? Neighborhood?
2.What are the weaknesses of the sites? Neighborhood?
3.What are the opportunities of the sites? Neighborhood?
Mapping Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities
When superimposed on a single drawing it becomes clear which neighbor-
hood weaknesses also represent opportunities. These areas receive the most
focus during the testing workshop and are labeled initiatives. Strengths of
the neighborhood are not forgotten but instead are enhanced so that whatev-
er assets they already possess can be enhanced.
Enhance
Initiatives
05.29.19
UN
D
E
R
S
T
A
N
D
I
N
G
&
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
19
Weaknesses
•Barriers to connectivity (I-15, Rail crossings, and Rio Grande Depot)
•Lack of connections to Downtown and western neighborhoods
•Issues related to homelessness
•Recent history of drug use and paraphernalia
•Perception that this is not a safe area
•Not enough shade and green, as well as poor air quality along I-15 corri-
dor
•Empty lots and dead areas with no activation
•Lack of neighborhood serving amenities (food and conveniences)
•Existing condition of 200 S (poor walkability and lack of green space)
•Lack of activity around North Temple and Central Stations
Strengths
•Rich density of transit access, among best in the region
•Opportunity for new development
•Historic significance and landmarks (Rio Grande Depot, Union Pacific
Depot)
•Unique character and sense of place
•Arts and creative industries (urban farm, arts uses, music)
•Gateway Center and theaters
•Community arts and entertainment venues
•Arena and destination events
•500 W park blocks (north of 200 S)
•Pockets of vitality
Opportunities
•Build on the arts and culture and maintain a unique district/destination
•Provide thoughtful open space and programming for a growing area
•Continue to address homelessness
•Improve stations and the transit experience; add density near transit nodes
•Create a great place for bikes and pedestrians
•Address the need for housing and housing choices
•Improve the feeling of safety in the neighborhood; increase the vibrancy
•Build/connect to the Folsom Trail and beyond
•Connect 500 W to the north
•Add value amenities and retail/commercial
CENTRAL STATION AREA PLAN30
RDA AND UTA BLOCKS
These UTA and RDA-owned sites are approximately 16 acres and are bisect-
ed by 100 South. The area is envisioned as a mid-density mixed-use neigh-
borhood.
•Recommend branding as 1st and 6th neighborhood
•UTA will move its central bus operations and maintenance facility west
of Salt Lake Central Station in 3 to 5 years, opening up UTA-owned par-
cels for development
•Full potential requires willing sellers and partnerships between owners
PRIMARY STUDY AREAS
PROGRAM
•500+/- Multi-Family Units
–1 Parking Space / Unit
•5,000+/- SF of Retail
•35,000+/- SF of Office
•40,000+/- SF of Cultural
600 WEST
SIGNIFICANT LANDMARKS
I-15
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL1
2
3
200 SOUTH
100 SOUTH4
5
RDA and UTA Blocks Study Area
1
2
3
4
5
05.29.19
PL
A
N
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
31
200 SOUTH
SIGNIFICANT LANDMARKS
100 SOUTH
FOLSOM TRAIL1
2
3
Proposed RDA and UTA Blocks
MULTI-FAMILY (4 STORIES)
COMMERCIAL (GROUND LEVEL RETAIL)
CIVIC AND/OR CULTURAL (GROUND LEVEL AND 1 STORY
STANDALONE)
USE
METRO MUSIC HALL TO REMAIN
SUN TRAPP TO REMAIN
POTENTIAL CIVIC AND/OR CULTURAL STRUCTURE5
6
7
OFFICE (4 STORIES)600 WEST4
1
ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY (3 STORY TOWNHOUSES)
2
3
4
5
6
7
CENTRAL STATION AREA PLAN46
IMPLEMENTATION
POLICY OBJECTIVES
To guide the implementation of this effort, the following policy objectives
should be adopted by all of the partners. These policy objectives relate to one
another, but each represents advancing the sustainability and viability of the
Central Station district as a desirable place to live, work, and play.
Substantially Improve the Station Environment for Riders
All early UTA efforts should be focused on addressing the deficiencies in
the user experience around the TRAX and Frontrunner station area. Based
on interviews with over 100 rush hour riders, the most desired amenities
include rain/sun coverage, walker-friendly, intuitive signage, and improved
walkability. Adding these types of noticeable amenities will signal to riders
that people-oriented change is taking place in the station area.
Support Walking and Biking Infrastructure
Hand-in-hand with the improvements immediately around the station,
extend walking and biking infrastructure from the station into the neighbor-
hood. Every improvement to existing streets and design for new street net-
works should take into consideration and prioritize the comfort of walking
and bicycling. This adds to the desirability of the neighborhood, as well as to
the viability of transit as a primary mode of transportation.
Support Reduced Parking Ratios
Reduced parking ratios, either through incentives or maximum parking al-
lowances, will increase affordability of new housing, office, and retail space
and incentivize more ridership from residents. City, UTA, and RDA should
develop a common policy to support reduced parking ratios for development
in the station area. Last mile accommodations (bike share, car share, and
curbside rideshare pick up) should be enhanced to balance mobility.
Support Residential uses to Prevent and Minimize the Homelessness
Coordinated efforts among multiple agencies have made measurable prog-
ress in helping the homeless population, while mitigating the effects of con-
solidated services in the Central Station area. The addition of new mixed-in-
come developments will encourage new uses and improve livability of the
neighborhood.
Build a True New Neighborhood Center at 1st & 6th
New development on RDA and UTA's parcels north and south of 100 S
should center around a new retail hub in the city with a unique arts, enter-
tainment, and counter culture character. A funky, interesting mix of tenants
that incorporates several existing establishments will add to the draw.
POLICY OBJECTIVES
•Improve the station environment
•Support walkability and cycling infra-
structure
•Support efforts to prevent and minimize
homelessness
•Support reduced parking ratios
•Build a true neighborhood center at
1st & 6th
•Leverage TOD to infuse housing options
for a mix of incomes
05.29.19
PL
A
N
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
47
STRATEGIES FOR MIXED-
INCOME TOD HOUSING
•Inclusive, community-based station
area vision and plan
•Public/private partnerships
•Transition Naturally Occurring
Affordable Housing (NOAH) units to
permanent affordable housing
•Inclusionary housing requirement
•State priority for LIHTC projects located
within 1/2 mile of TOD station
•Financial tools (TRIDs, TIF, bonds) ded-
icated to fund affordable units
•Land acquisition/bank
•Incentive-based zoning (density bonus)
•Reduced parking requirements
Leverage TOD as an Opportunity to Provide a Range of Housing Options
Transit-oriented development at Central Station provides a timely opportu-
nity to direct the City's policy around affordable and mixed-income housing.
As housing prices in Salt Lake continue to rise and many demographics
delay home ownership, rent burden as a percentage of income has increased,
while the supply of attainable multi-family housing in the city has been
constrained.
A fair amount of subsidized and workforce housing has begun to be built
towards the northern portion of the Station Area. However, during our
process, there were mixed opinions about the desirability of building more
affordable housing in this part of the city. Despite this discord, there is a
critical need. Other cities have seen great success in implementing mixed-in-
come housing strategies in transitional neighborhoods like Central Station.
New development sites in the 1st & 6th neighborhood have the potential to
become equitable TOD neighborhoods. The Central Station developments
could be used as a beta test for putting in place unique incentives for re-
quirements for developers to build 20% of the new housing at affordable to
80-120% of the area median income or lower.
Because housing is a relatively market-viable use, in particular on the east-
ern portions of the station area, those market forces could be harnessed and
supplemented using the strategies to the right. This type of inclusionary
requirement should be included in any RFPs for developer partners.
Benefits of TOD
•Provides housing and mobility choice
•Im roves environmental erformance
•Supports healthy lifestyle
•Strengthens transit system
•Creates lasting value
•Reduces greenhouse gas emission
•Results in infrastructure cost savings
B n fits f Mix -Inc m
Nei hborhood
•Provides needed housin
•Hel s de-concentrate overt
•Integrates lower income
ouse o s into t e w o e
neighborhoo
•Hel s workforce stabilit
A iti n l B n fits
f Mixed-Income TO
•Offers truly affordable
ousin
•Stabilizes transit ridership
•Broa ens access to
ortunit
•Relieves gentrification
pressure
Source: Center for Transit Oriented Development
February 2024
100 South
Design Workshop
Introduction
100 South Design Workshop
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt
Lake City (SLC RDA) owns a collection
of parcels totaling over 4 acres
focused around the segment of 100
South bounded by 600 West and
South Dansie Drive.
The project site is adjacent to
notable cultural uses such as the
Metro Music Hall, the Sun Trapp,
Utah Arts Alliance - Art Factory,
Make Salt Lake, and the Wasatch
Community Gardens.
The western edge of the site
is adjacent to rail tracks for
Frontrunner, Amtrak, and other rail
service as well as Interstate 15, which
serves vehicle and freight movement
across the state.
The parcels are zoned for Gateway
Mixed Use (G-MU) which allows for
‘a mixture of residential, commercial,
and assembly uses within an urban
neighborhood atmosphere.’ The
G-MU zone requires buildings to be
at least 75 feet, with a maximum
allowable height of 180 feet.
6
5
4
3
2
1 Wasatch Community Garden
Make Salt Lake
Map of RDA owned parcels Metro Music Hall
BWP Communications
Utah Arts Alliance
The Sun Trapp
100 South
60
0
W
e
s
t
City-Owned and
Available for Access Use
2 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 3
Existing and Upcoming Multi Family Housing
GREEN LOOP
District Context
1/4 Mile
1/4 Mile
Major Connections
GREEN LOOP
JAPANTOWN
STREET
Cultural Amenities
GREEN LOOP
JAPANTOWN
STREET
Map of major infrastructure in proximity to the 100 South parcels.
Existing and proposed cultural landmarks and amenities in proximity to 100 South parcels.
Map of recently built and proposed multi-family housing in proximity to the 100 South parcels.
100 South Design Workshop
Downtown Connections: The 100
South parcels are located within
walking distance to a wealth of
existing and future transportation
infrastructure including both Salt
Lake Central Station and North
Temple Station, the Folsom Trail, and
the future Green Loop on 500 West.
Cultural Amenities: The site
is located at the heart of the
Downtown entertainment and night
life including venues such as The
Metro Music Hall, The Complex, The
Gateway, and the Delta Center.
This is complemented by important
cultural sites such as the Sun Trapp
bar for the LGBTQIA community and
Centro Civico for the Hispanic and
LatinX community.
Residential Development: In recent
years, this portion of the Depot
District has experience a boom of
multi-family residential development.
The scale of these buildings are
typically in the 4-6 story range.
SITE
SITE
JAPANTOWN
STREET
JAPANTOWN
STREET
SITE
Green Loop
Site Area
Multi-Family Housing
Key Connections
Transit
Green Loop
Site Area
Key Connections
Transit
Green Loop
Site Area
Cultural Landmarks and Amenities
Key Connections
Transit
4 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 5
Design
Workshop
On September 12th, 2023, SLC RDA,
Salt Lake City, and Perkins&Will
conducted a work session to explore
the potential site layout, land
uses, and programming for these
parcels. Perkins&Will presented
4 preliminary design options to
initiate ideation and refinement of a
preferred concept.
Attendees
SLC RDA
SLC Planning Division
SLC Department of Economic
Development
SLC Arts Council
Perkins&Will
Option 1
All
Housing
Mu
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
Mu
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
Multi- Family
Townhomes Townhomes
Mid- Block Walkway
Option 2
All
Housing
Mid- Block Walkway
Multi- Family
Multi- Family
Multi- Family
Townhomes Town
homes
Preliminary Design Options Workshop Comments
100 South Design Workshop
Option 1 focuses on multi-family residential development with
buildings oriented to provide a mid-block walkway in the
interior the site.
Option 3 focuses on multi-family residential development on
the northern portion of the site with commercial development
on the southern portion, including Urban Vertical Farming Use
and space for food trucks.
Option 2 focuses on multi-family residential development
with buildings oriented to provide common green spaces for
residents. The mid-block walkway goes through the ground
floor of new buildings.
Option 4 places multi-family residential on both the northern
and southern segment of the site; Urban Vertical Farming
Use is anchored in the northwest corner to buffer the rail and
freeway; The ground floor is lined with active uses.
Photographs of comments on the
design options from the 9/12 workshop.
Option 4
Housing
and Vertical
Harvest
Vertical
Harvest
Mid- Block Walkway
Mu
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
Multi- Family
Multi- Family
Retail / Cultural
URBAN
VERTICAL
FARMING
Option 3
Housing
and Vertical
Harvest
Mid- Block Walkway
Mu
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
Vertical HarvestCommercial
Food Stalls
URBAN VERTICAL
FARMING
6 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 7
Key Takeaway 1:
Establish a
Development
Framework
1. 100 South: The existing right-of-way for the segment of 100
South between 600 West to Danzie Drive is approximately
120 feet and underutilized. There is an opportunity to
reconfigure the street to provide vehicle access, on-street
parking, usable open spaces and community programming.
2. Mid Block Walkway: In alignment with the Salt Lake City
Downtown Master Plan concept for mid block walkways,
the framework proposes a north-south walkway along the
western edge of the Metro Music Hall and proposed multi-
family residential project along 600 West.
3. 600 West: In the future, 600 West could be redesigned to
ensure a safer, more comfortable multi-modal connection
to Salt Lake Central Station, North Temple Station, and the
Folsom Trail.
4. Loading/Access Zones: Provide loading access routes
in the interior of the parcels to service future mixed-use
development and provide adequate access for fire trucks.
5. Open Spaces: Identify opportunities for new open space
such as the terminus of 100 south as an event plaza,
internal green spaces to support future residents, and
the easy conversion of the mid-block walkway to support
events at the Metro Music Hall.
Conceptual bird’s eye diagram of proposed street
connections and open spaces.
100 South Design Workshop
8 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 9
Key Takeaway 2:
Housing is a
Priority
1. Affordable Housing: Housing development should adhere
to RDA’s housing priorities including deeply affordable
units, opportunities for home-ownership, with a focus on
local artists.
2. 5-Over-1: Emphasis on supporting mid-rise development,
specifically 5 over 1 multi-family residential. This common
construction type is aligned with recent multi-family
development within the Depot District and could help
facilitate greater affordability.
3. Family Size Housing: There was a question about whether
family size housing would be appropriate in this section of
Downtown as it is in the heart of a growing entertainment
and night life district in addition to its proximity to heavy
rail and I-15. This topic will require further consideration by
the RDA.
100 South Design Workshop
Conceptual bird’s eye diagram of proposed multi-family
residential development.
10 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 11
Key Takeaway 3:
Arts, Music,
and Farming
100 South Design Workshop
1. Music Education and Events: Workshop attendees sited
a multi-purpose entertainment complex at the terminus
of 100 South that could include indoor and outdoor
performance spaces, rehearsal rooms, and other relevant
music programming. This typology is based on Stage AE
located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The right-of-way at
the end of the street would be transformed into an outdoor
concert venue. Additionally, to better support the Metro
Music Hall, the mid-block walkway should be designed to
be temporarily closed off for outdoor events.
2. Arts Programming: In lieu of traditional retail spaces lining
100 south, a portion of the ground floor of new residential
development could be designated for artist and artisan
spaces.
3. Urban Vertical Farming Use: Due to the nature of the site,
it was determined that this could be a good location for an
urban vertical farming use that could contribute to the mid-
rise density of the neighborhood while providing access
to fresh produce and potential workforce development
opportunities. There are groups across the country that run
these types of programs, some of which have expressed
interest in establishing a location in Salt Lake City. This type
of facility could be sited at the northern end of the property
as a way to effectively buffer residential from noise coming
from the rail and freeway.
Conceptual bird’s eye diagram of proposed arts, music,
and vertical farming programming.
12 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 13
100 South Design Workshop
Conceptual bird’s eye diagram of the preferred design concept.
14 Rio Grande District Vision and Implementation Plan 15
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED
NOVEMBER 2024
Salt Lake Central
Housing and Transit Reinvestment Zone
(HTRZ)
Provides an opportunity to implement the strategic planning work that
has been done in this area, including recommendations of the Salt Lake
Central Station Area Plan, Rio Grande District Vision and
Implementation Plan, and TechLink TRAX Study.
Planned infrastructure investments include the construction of new
mid-block streets, safe pedestrian and bicycle connections to transit
facilities, the concentration of shared parking facilities, potential
expansion of the TRAX network, and sustainable utility upgrades.
HTRZ funds will support transformative mixed-use development with
a high level of public benefit, with assistance provided to overcome
natural and man-made development impediments and current market
conditions.
The model anticipates that 59.8% of the collection parcel acreage will
contain residential uses for a total of 5,793 residential units averaging
83 units per acre. 174 units will be attainable for those earning up to
60% of Area Median Income (“AMI”) and 521 attainable for those
earning up to 80% AMI. Existing RDA policies target the creation of
owner-occupied housing and will be implemented within the HTRZ
when possible.
The proposed HTRZ is in an area with some of the highest development
potential left in Salt Lake City. The development model anticipates the
creation of 565,358 sf of commercial space, 59,000 sf of light
industrial/maker space, 3,293,234 sf of office, and 325 hotel rooms.
4Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ
The vision for the HTRZ – to encourage dense, mixed-use, walkable, sustainable development
adjacent to the most transit-rich site in the State of Utah – fully embraces key legislative
objectives:
11
Housing Supply
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ
Based on the development model, it is estimated that approximately 59.8% of the collection parcel acreage
will incorporate residential uses for a total of 5,793 housing units averaging 83 units per acre.
Please refer to page 12 – Affordable Housing Funding Priorities – for further details on RDA-imposed
requirements for varied dwelling unit sizes and housing affordability that is maintained through deed
restriction.
Figure 8. Map of estimated housing density, by collection parcel
15
Key Objectives
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ
Higher utilization of public transit
Per 63N-3-603(1), a HTRZ proposal shall promote the following objectives:
Increasing availability of housing, including affordable housing, and fulfillment of
moderate income housing plans
Promoting and encouraging development of owner-occupied housing
The proposed Salt Lake Central HTRZ may be the most transit-rich site in the entire State of Utah and
the convergence of FrontRunner, TRAX, local bus routes, Amtrak, and Greyhound services will offer
compelling alternatives to a vehicle for those who live, work in, and visit the area. Planned future TRAX
extensions will enhance rider options with direct connections to the Airport, U of U, and emerging
Granary District. The broader UTA transit network provides access to event venues such as America First
Field, the future ballpark being developed at Daybreak, and other higher education institutions via the
FrontRunner line that runs from Ogden to Provo.
As described on page 12, the RDA intends to utilize its HTRZ Tax Increment Reimbursement Policy to
offset increased costs associated with affordable housing. Implementation of this policy will ensure that
minimum affordable housing thresholds outlined in 63N-603-2 are not only met but surpassed. Tax
increment generated with the HTRZ may also be utilized to support the RDA’s other various housing
funding programs, which are developed in coordination with Salt Lake City and meant to support its
moderate income housing plan, Housing SLC (2023).
The Agency has published the Residential Wealth Building Pilot Program, which is aimed at helping low-
to moderate-income families and individuals build wealth through affordable housing opportunities. This
initiative is designed to address the homeownership gap in Salt Lake City and provide innovative
pathways for economic stability. The Residential Wealth Building Pilot Program will offer funding for
projects that create affordable homeownership and shared equity models, supporting the development
of family and workforce housing. With an emphasis on promoting long-term financial stability and wealth
accumulation, the program prioritizes housing development solutions such as rent-to-own units, condo or
co-op conversions, tenant shared-equity models, and more. The initiative aligns with RDA’s goal of
equitable economic growth, addressing systemic barriers to wealth for underserved communities.
16Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ
Improving efficiencies in parking and transportation, including walkability of
communities near public transit facilities
Overcoming development impediments and market conditions that render a
development cost prohibitive absent the proposal and incentives
Conserving water resources through efficient land use
Improving air quality by reducing fuel consumption and motor vehicle trips
The dense nature of the proposed developments within the HTRZ leads to water conservation via efficient
landscape design and the lack of individual lawns requiring irrigation, as compared to single family or less-
dense development. According to the EPA’s Protecting Water Resources with Higher-Density Development
study, it has modeled that on a per housing unit basis, higher density developments produce less
stormwater runoff and provide less impervious cover than low-density development. The decrease in
stormwater runoff can assist in the reduction of downstream pollutants and toxins being deposited due to
storm runoff which, combined with other efforts, seek to prevent the Great Salt Lake from further decline.
The Rio Grande District - which will form the heart of the HTRZ near Salt Lake Central Station - is
envisioned to become a model of urban-scale transit-oriented development for the State of Utah. The
Vision & Implementation Plan prioritizes connectivity and accessibility with the creation of new mid-block
streets, low-stress pedestrian and cyclist facilities, and a safe and walkable environment with highly
activated ground floor spaces. The Plan also includes a shared parking garage that will concentrate parking
at the perimeter of the Rio Grande District a) so that other land can be put to more efficient uses and b) to
reduce the number of curb cuts and potential vehicle-pedestrian conflicts within the core. Public parking
spaces within the shared structure could be utilized by those accessing Salt Lake Central Station to take
transit elsewhere.
The RDA acknowledges that the level of density associated with transit-oriented development will incur
substantial horizontal and vertical construction costs. Although interest rates have fallen, and are
forecasted to continue to fall through 2025, they remain high enough to stall this caliber of development.
The HTRZ will allow the RDA to fund critical infrastructure upgrades and offer eligible development
projects a tax increment reimbursement to overcome increased costs and encourage more timely
development. This is especially crucial given the timing of the 2034 Winter Olympics.
The proximity and network breadth of Salt Lake Central Station provides viable alternatives to vehicle
usage. By bringing uses such as office, retail, and housing within walking distance of each other, there are
efficiencies that would not otherwise be viable. Salt Lake Central provides transit access to the wider
Wasatch Front and can reduce vehicle trips. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE),
mixed-use development leads to 20% internal capture, or reduced vehicle trips, which directly lowers
vehicle emissions.
17Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
SALT LAKE CENTRAL HTRZ
Encouraging transformative mixed-use development and investment in
transportation and public transit infrastructure in strategic areas
Strategic land use and municipal planning in major transit investment corridors as
described in Subsection 10-9a-403(2)
Increasing access to employment and educational opportunities
Increasing access to child care
These objectives perfectly encapsulate the vision for the area, and the HTRZ will be a key tool in
bringing the many moving parts together to deliver on it. The Rio Grande District will raise the bar for
development in Salt Lake City and Utah with unprecedented levels of density, mixed-use design,
walkability, and sustainability. The proposed redevelopment of UTA’s Salt Lake Central Station will
enhance the public transit experience at a primary gateway to the city, which is vital to providing lasting
impressions for riders and growing ridership levels. Other initiatives such as the planned TRAX
extensions, Green Loop, and 400 South Bikeway will only enhance the overall network and feasibility of
its use to access jobs, shopping, recreational, and educational opportunities across the Wasatch Front.
In addition, Salt Lake City was awarded nearly $2 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to
study solutions for eliminating barriers caused by transportation infrastructure, and there is potential for
this work to result in recommendations within the HTRZ. Local advocates have developed the concept
of relocating freight and Frontrunner rails into an underground train trench (the “Rio Grande Plan” - not
to be confused with the Rio Grande District Vision & Implementation Plan), which is one option that will
be considered through this effort.
The tax increment generated from the HTRZ can be used to support the development of residential,
office, and retail spaces that would otherwise not be built at this time due to the current cost
prohibitive market conditions. Jobs will be created within the HTRZ through the construction of these
new spaces. The RDA intends to partner with organizations such as EDCUtah, the Salt Lake Chamber,
and the Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity to find the optimal developers and tenants. In
addition, residents of the HTRZ can utilize adjacent transit infrastructure to access job centers and
educational institutions across the Wasatch Front. Many universities and colleges have partnered with
UTA to provide their enrolled students with free transit access.
Salt Lake City has identified a need for more child care facilities in the city, and tax increment generated
from the HTRZ could be used to incentivize their inclusion in residential or commercial developments
within the HTRZ. Additionally, the Agency has a Housing Development Loan Program that provides
competitive low-interest loans to projects that meet certain project priorities, one of which is affordable
family housing with amenities for children.
This page has intentionally been left blank
Japantown Streetscape and Public Art
Update
November 18, 2025
CRA Involvement
•2018: West Quarter development facilitation.
•2019: Japantown Design Strategy and Guidelines document.
•2024-2025: Japantown 40% construction documents.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
West Quarter Facilitation
•The CRA assisted in obtaining the following outcomes between the Community and the
West Quarter development:
1.Ensuring the Community and the Ritchie Group would work together to avoid trash
pickup during festivals, church services, and other events.
2.Negotiating West Quarter design changes that reduced north-facing back of house
functions and improve connectivity with Japantown Street.
3.Regrading and repaving of the SLBT/JCC parking lots parcels to open connections
between the West Quarter and Japantown Street.
4.Reserving 10% of Block 67 tax increment for public right of way improvements to
Japantown Street.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Design Strategy & Guidelines
•The Community created this vision statement that identified important themes and
concepts for the Japantown design, which GSBS worked to incorporate.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Design Strategy and Guidelines - Site Plan
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
40% Construction Documents
•The CRA and GSBS translated the Design Strategy and Guidelines into a validated
technical document with input from Community members.
•These documents further refine the Community desires regarding the annual festivals,
placemaking, and walkability of Japantown.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Agenda
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
•Review Streetscape;
•Review Placemaking elements;
•Review Cost Estimate;
•Update on Public Art and Current Needs;
•Questions
ET01
24
-
0
4
0
07
.
0
3
.
2
0
2
5
JA
P
A
N
T
O
W
N
SU
E
E
X
H
I
B
I
T
TC
C
J
O
B
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
DA
T
E
:
PR
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
1588 SOUTH MAIN STREETSUITE 200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115801.743.1300
SCALE
Placemaking Elements
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT
3/8” = 1’-0”LS807
1 LS807
SITE DETAILS
EAST/WEST
ELEVATION
NORTH/SOUTH
ELEVATION ELEVATION
SECTION A
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
ຊ
ਓ
ொ
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
1'-10"
1'
-
0
"
4"
6'
-
4
"
4'
-
0
"
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
10
"
2'-6"
4"4"
4"
18
'
-
6
"
ALUMINUM ANGLES ON 4
SIDES. CENTERED ON
CORNER POSTS.
ALL EXPOSED ALUMINUM TO
BE PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS
PAINT DARK CHARCOAL,
SATIN FINISH.
CONCEAL ANY STRUCTURAL
ELEMENT/CONNECTION.
SEE SHEET LS101 & LS105
FOR LOCATIONS.
1/8” ALUMINUM SHEET
LASER CUT PATTERN AND
PAINTED.
0.125 ALUMINUM FABRICATED
EXTERIOR COVER TO PROVIDE
1/8” LIP AROUND TO HAVE
THE PATTERN SHEET TO SIT
FLUSH ON.
0.125 ALUMINUM WITH LASER
CUT LETTERS AND GRAPHICS.
RESIN LENS PANEL TO BE
PLACED RIGHT BEHIND. DO
NOT PROVIDE ANY GAP.
1/8” ALUMINUM SHEET
LASER CUT PATTERN AND
PAINTED
ALUMINUM ANGLES
ON 4 SIDES. CENTERED
ON CORNER POSTS.
AA
CONCEALED LED LIGHTING.
COORDINATE WITH ELEC.
COLOR TEMPERATURE AND
COLOR TO BE ADJUSTABLE.
FROSTED WHITE TRANSLUCENT
1/4” RESIN PANEL. CONCEAL
PANEL CONNECTIONS AND
HARDWARE.
ALUMINUM SQUARE TUBE
STRUCTURE FRAMING.
0.125 ALUMINUM
FABRICATED EXTERIOR
COVER.
FABRICATED ALUMINUM
FAUX TOP.
SLC JAPANTOWN LOGO
“OKAGE SAMA DE”
TRANSLATION: “I AM WHO
I AM BECAUSE OF YOU.”
TRANSLATION:
JAPANESE TOWN
FROSTED WHITE
TRANSLUCENT 1/4” RESIN
PANEL LENS.
FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL REQ.
EXPOSED CONCRETE
TO BE ARCHITECTURAL
FINISH.
2'-6"
5"
2'
-
6
"
4"
5'
-
4
"
09/26/2025
CROSSWALK PATTERN
NOT TO SCALELS808
1 LS808
SITE DETAILS
MMA PAINT APPLICATION WITH
REQUIRED COATING. PROVIDE 2’
WHITE PAINTED BAND ON EACH END.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
DIMENSIONS.
FINAL DESIGN TBD
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CROSS
WALKS.
OVERALL CROSSWALK PATTERN LAYOUT
CROSSWALK - WEST CROSSWALK - EASTCROSSWALK - CENTER
09/26/2025
TIMELINE ELEMENTS DETAIL
1 1/2” = 1’-0”LS809
1 LS809
SITE DETAILS
ETCHED BRONZE:
1
8
8
0
s
|
明
治
１
０
年
台
JAPANESE LABORERS
ARRIVE IN UTAH
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer
adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod
tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat
volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tationex ea commodo.
3’ X 1’-6” CAST BRONZE PLAQUE. EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE PAVING.
FINAL DESIGN TBD
JOINT LOCATIONS. SEE SITE PLAN.
TRANSLATION—”MEIJI ERA 10s”
9” EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE
BAND TO FOLLOW THE TIMELINE.
SEE SITE PLAN.
4” BRONZE STRIP EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE
PAVEMENT. 20-25 SECTIONS TO BE ETCHED WITH
LETTERS & NUMBERS AND FILLED.
PLAN VIEW
3'-0"
1'
-
6
"
9"4"
1"
09/26/2025
ERA’S DISPLAYS TYP.
3/8” = 1’-0”LS810
1
LS810
SITE DETAILS
FRONT
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - FRONT & BACK
SINGLE SIDED BACKSIDE-RIGHT SIDE-LEFT
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
͓
͔
͛
͞
·
Ͱ
I
A
M
W
H
O
I
A
M
B
E
C
A
U
S
E
O
F
Y
O
U
I AM WHO I AM BECAUSE OF YOU
1 9 3 0 - 1 9 5 0 | 昭 和 五 年 - 昭 和 ２５ 年
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum
dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in
hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue
duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam,
O K
A
G
E
S
A
M
A
D
E
WOOD PANELS:
2”X8” THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS. APPLY A CLEAR
COAT, SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPER DECK OR EQUIVALENT.
STEEL FRAMING:
1/2” BASE AND VERTICAL CENTER PLATES, AND 1/4” STEEL
PLATE FOR OTHER HORIZONTAL PANELS.
PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS PAINT DARK BRONZE, OR
AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EXTERIOR PAINT. MATTE FINISH.
ALL JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND EDGES AND CORNERS
SMOOTHED.
QUANTITY:
FIVE (5) TOTAL. THREE (3) SINGLE SIDED BACK AND
TWO (2) DOUBLE SIDED BACK PANELS.
THIS IS A NON-ILLUMINATED SIGN.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
INFORMATION PANEL:
HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE FULL COLOR PRINTED PANEL.
1/4” THICKNESS. MOUNTED TO THE WOOD PLANKS BEHIND.
PANELS TO HAVE 45 DEGREE ANGLE CUTS TO SIT FLUSH
WITH OTHER CONNECTING PANELS. CONCEAL ALL
MOUNTING HARDWARE. PANELS MUST BE SERVICEABLE
INDIVISUALLY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
FRONT: 1’-8” X 3’-6“
SIDE: 5.5” X 3’-6”
BACK: 7” X 3’-6”
PREDRILL HOLES FOR THE MOUNTING HARDWARE TO
RECESS INTO THE HOLES. USE TAMPER RESISTANT MINIMALY
VISIBLE HARDWARE. EACH PLANK SHOULD COME OFF
SEPARATELY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - SIDE
WOOD PLANKS2 2
1/4” PLATE CAP
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS.
3'
-
6
"
6"
2'-0"
1'-8"
6'
-
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
7
"
7"
DOUBLE SIDED BACK
I AM WHO I AM BECAUSE OF YOU
1 9 3 0 - 1 9 5 0 | 昭 和 五 年 - 昭 和 ２５ 年
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum
dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in
hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue
duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam,
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
͓
͔
͛
͞
·
Ͱ
I
A
M
W
H
O
I
A
M
B
E
C
A
U
S
E
O
F
Y
O
U
O
K
A
G
E
S
A
M
A
D
E
COORDINATE FOOTING WITH
STRUCTURAL ENG.
EXPOSED CONCRETE TO BE
ARCHITECTURAL FINISH.
8"8"8"2"
6"
6"
3/4"
1/4"
2'-0"
6"
2"
2"
2"
1/2"
6"
6"
1/2"
3'
-
6
"
1'-8"
2"
09/26/2025
MAP DISPLAY TYP.
1 1/2” = 1’-0”LS811
1 LS811
SITE DETAILS
1/2” STEEL PANEL
1/2” STEEL BASE PANEL
CONCRETE FOOTING
COORDINATE WITH
STRUCTURAL ENG.
1/4” STEEL PANEL
2”X8” WOOD PANEL
1/4” THICK STEEL FRAME
1/2” DEEP
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK STEEL FRAME
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
45 DEGREE ANGLE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
PLACED INSIDE OF THE
FRAME
FRONT VIEW EXTERIOR SIDE VIEW
STEEL FRAMING:
1/2” BASE AND VERTICAL CENTER PLATES. 1/4” PLATE TO
BE USED FOR THE REMAINING.
PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS PAINT DARK BRONZE, OR
AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EXTERIOR PAINT. MATTE FINISH.
ALL JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND EDGES AND CORNERS
SMOOTHED.
WOOD PANELS:
2”X8” THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD
PLANKS. APPLY A CLEAR COAT,
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPER DECK OR
EQUIVALENT.
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS.
2’-8” FROM GROUND TO THE
CENTER OF THE SIGN
INFORMATION PANEL:
HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE FULL COLOR PRINTED
PANEL. 1/4” THICKNESS. MOUNTED TO THE WOOD
PLANKS BEHIND. PANELS TO HAVE 45 DEGREE
ANGLE CUTS TO SIT FLUSH WITH OTHER
CONNECTING PANELS. CONCEAL ALL MOUNTING
HARDWARE. PANELS SHOULD BE SERVISEABLE
INDIVISUALLY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
SIZE: 36”X14”
FINAL DESIGN TBD
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - EXTERIOR SIDES
2”X8” THERMALLY
MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS.
PRE-DRILLED HOLE
FOR BOLTS
2”X8” THERMALLY
MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS.
1/2” STEEL PANEL
1/2” STEEL PANEL
COUNTERSUNK
BOLTS
COUNTERSUNK
BOLTS
1/4” STEEL PANEL
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - FRONT & BACK
1/4” STEEL PANEL
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
1/4” THICK STEEL PLATE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
SECURED FROM THE BACK SIDE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
PLACED INSIDE OF THE FRAME
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
A
A
SECTION A
2"
1/2"
6"
1/4"
1'-2"
1/2"
1/4"
6"
1/4"
1/2"
9 1/4"
1/2"
1/2"6"2 3/4"
2"
3'-0 1/2"
1/4"1/4"
2'
-
8
"
4"4"
2'
-
4
1/4"
1'
-
8
1/4"
8"
09/26/2025
LS812
SITE DETAILS
S A L T L A KE CITY JAPANTOWN
•
E
S
T. 1907 • おかげさまで• OKAGE SAMA DE • I AM
WH
O
I
A
M
BECAUSE OF YOU •
TREE GRATE DESIGN
3/4” = 1’-0”LS812
2MANHOLE COVER
NTSLS812
1
CUSTOM CAST IRON MANHOLE COVER TO BE
USED OVER CITY OWNED UTILITIES AND PRIVATE
UTILITIES UPON PERMISSION.
APPROXIMATE SIZE: 3’ DIA.
TWO (2) CUSTOM DESIGNS.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR QUANTITY.
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREEGRATES
TOTAL THICKNESS: 1.25”
INSTALL FRAME PER MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS. NO OPENING GREATER
THAN 1/2. GREY AREAS INDICATE 3/8”
RECESSED AREAS, DO NOT KNOCK OUT.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
FOUR (4) CUSTOM DESIGNS.
FABRICATED IN 4 SECTIONS FOR ACCESS.
18” OPENING FOR TREE.
INSTALL EACH TREE GRATE WITH
PATTERN FACING THE SAME
DIRECTION. FINAL DESIGN TBD
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR
QUANTITY.
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
5'
-
0
"
1'
-
6
"
09/26/2025
LS813
SITE DETAILS
CUSTOM CONCRETE STAMPS
PRESSED ON WET CONCRETE, RECESS
TO BE NO MORE THAN 1/4” DEEP.
THREE (3) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “AUTUMN” AREA.
FOUR (4) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “WINTER” AREA.
CUSTOM CONCRETE STAMP EXAMPLE
3/4” = 1’-0”LS813
1
CUSTOM ONE POINT ELEMENTS STAMPED ON THE
CONCRETE PAVEMENT.
APPROXIMATE FREQUENCY OF STAMPING AND SIZE OF
ELEMENTS SHOWN. EACH STAMP SIZE VARY BETWEEN
2”X2”-5”X5”.
JOINTS
PLAN VIEW
STAMP DESIGN - “WINTER”
STAMP DESIGN - “AUTUMN”
THREE (3) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “SUMMER” AREA.
SIX (6) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “SPRING” AREA.
“SPRING” AREA
“AUTUMN” AREA “WINTER” AREA
“SUMMER” AREA
STAMP DESIGN - “SPRING”
STAMP DESIGN - “SUMMER”
STAMPED CONCRETE
KEY PLAN
3'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
3'-0"3'-0"
09/26/2025
LIGHT POLE BANNERS TYP.
3/8” = 1’-0”LS814
1 LS814
SITE DETAILS
LI
G
H
T
P
O
L
E
BANNER ARM (REFER TO
LIGHT POLE DETAIL)
DOUBLE SIDED POLYESTER FABRIC BANNER.
FULL COLOR PRINTED.
FOUR (4) VARIATIONS, DISTRIBUTED
EVENLY. TWO(2) BANNERS PER VEHICULAR
LIGHT POLE.
SEE ELECTRICAL SHEET FOR LOCATIONS
AND QUANTITY.
BANNER VARIATION: FOUR BANNER VARIATION TO
BE CREATED TO REPRESENT AND BE SWAPPED
FOR EACH SEASON.
LIGHT POLE- REFERENCE
ELECTRICAL SHEET.
FOUR (4) LOOP HANGING
LOOPS TO BE SEWN.
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
KEY PLAN
VEHICULAR LIGHT POLE LOCATION
4"
8'
-
0
"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
2'-6"
7'
-
4
1/8"
4"
09/26/2025
EXISTING
GARDEN
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
551
552
553
554
555
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP102
PLANTING PLAN
1
LP102
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
1
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
3
)
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
1 STREELIGHT
3 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
2 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT
TYPE LS TYPE LP
LI
G
H
T
P
O
L
E
LIGHT POLE
JA
P
A
N
T
O
W
N
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
ES
T
.
1
9
0
7
JA
P
A
N
T
O
W
N
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
ES
T
.
1
9
0
7
BANNER ARM
BANNER ARM
DOUBLE SIDED POLYESTER FABRICBANNER. FULL COLOR PRINTED.
FOUR (4) VARIATIONS, DISTRIBUTEDEVENLY. TWO(2) BANNERS PERVEHICULAR LIGHT POLE.
SEE ELECTRICAL SHEET FORLOCATIONS AND QUANTITY.
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
Cost Estimate
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Japantown Cost Estimate
Streetscape
Improvements $4,899,265
Site Utilities $1,764,930
Electrical and Site
Lighting $886,750
Earthwork $805,951
Contingency, Insurance,
General Conditions,
Overhead
$2,655,501
Total Cost $11,012,397
Japantown Public Art - Mural
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Japantown Mural
Intent Paint a mural on the side of MESH.
Timing Spring 2026 reveal – weather permitting.
Temporary Art Immediate Next
Steps 1.Identify MESH dimensions to refine cost estimate.
2.Identify Community art committee members.
3.Coordinate with Arts Council on planning.
Permanent Art Needs
1.Coordinate with Art Design Board on any permanent object in the public ROW.
2.Identify preferred artist method: limited call for artists or a direct commission.
Budget $50,000-$75,000
Next Steps
•The CRA intends to proceed with the mural, in addition the Board may consider the following
options, which are not mutually exclusive:
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Japantown Options
Option 1 Allocate funding to construct short-term improvements that contribute to the beautification of
Japantown Street, such as the purchase of Japanese cherry trees, planters, and any
placemaking elements that would not be affected by Entertainment District construction.
Funding should also be identified for ongoing maintenance needs.
Option 2 Allocation of funding to complete additional design phases, as appropriate. Taking the project
to 70% design phase would move it closer to “construction ready”. This would allow a future,
100% design phase to accommodate Entertainment District elements that are yet to be
determined, such as vehicular access points.
Option 3 Begin to identify funding sources to allocate for future construction costs to the Project as a
sign of commitment. Funding may also include large construction mitigation grant that could be
allocated to the SLBT and JCC to counter any Entertainment District disruptions.
Option 4 Consider holding off on determining next steps until further details of the Entertainment
District are revealed in Summer 2026. The CRA would bring this project back before the Board
at that time.
Questions?
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:
Community Reinvestment Agency Chair
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Submission Date:
11/12/2025
Date Sent to Council:
11/12/2025
From:
Department *
Community Reinvestment Agency
Employee Name:
Stine, Robyn
E-mail
robyn.stine@slc.gov
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signature
Mayor's Office Chief of Staff Signature
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signed Date
11/12/2025
Chief of Staff's Signed Date
11/12/2025
Subject:
Japantown Streetscape and Public Art Update
Additional Staff Contact:
Marcus Lee, marcus.lee@slc.govDanny Walz, danny.walz@slc.gov
Presenters/Staff Table
Marcus Lee, marcus.lee@slc.govDanny Walz, danny.walz@slc.govBen Rodes, brodes@gsbsarchitects.com
Document Type
Information Item
Budget Impact?
Yes
No
Recommendation:
Consider taking further action on the Japantown Design Project by providing additional design funding, and funding to acquire and maintain up to 50 cherry trees in concrete planters along Japantown Street.
Background/Discussion
This wraps up roughly 7 years of involvement with the Japanese American community and the West Quarter development. The 40% design package contains construction documents of the streetscape and placemaking project should the Board decide to move forward with more design. The CRA has worked with GSBS Architects and the Community to translate desires into actionable design elements.
Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 118 WWW.SLC.GOV · HTTPS://CRA.SLC.GOV/
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR ERIN MENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY WALZ
Director
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
STAFF MEMO
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
RE:
November 7, 2025
Marcus Lee, Project Coordinator
Japantown Streetscape and Public Art Update
REQUESTED ACTION:
POLICY ITEM:
BUDGET IMPACTS:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Since 2018, the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (“CRA” or “Agency”) has partnered
with the Japanese American community regarding development matters on Japantown Street (100 South
between 200 West and 300 West). In 2019, this partnership evolved into the official Japantown Design
Strategy project (“Design Strategy”) through CRA Board (“Board”) funding. The COVID-19 pandemic
and a temporary pause as plans developed for the 2024 Downtown Sports, Entertainment, Culture and
Convention Center District (“Entertainment District”) delayed the next phase of the project, but on
September 29, 2025, the CRA received the Japantown Street 40% Construction Documents (“Japantown
Streetscape Design”) from GSBS Architects. This package, included in Attachment C, is the result of
translating the Japantown Vision that was articulated in the Design Strategy into 40% construction
documents for infrastructure improvements to Japantown Street. The deliverable includes an itemized
project cost estimate, which totals $11,012,397.
The purpose of this memorandum is to update the CRA Board of Directors on the status of the Japantown
Streetscape Design and public art efforts.
BACKGROUND:
In July 2018, the Board asked CRA staff to facilitate discussions between the Ritchie Group, Salt Lake
County (“County”), and the Japanese American community (“Community”) to mitigate the impacts of the
Ritchie Group’s West Quarter Development on Block 67 on Japantown Street (“Japantown”), and to work
with the same identified group (“Stakeholders”) to explore ways to enhance Japantown. The main
representatives of the Community included the Japanese Church of Christ (“JCC”), the Salt Lake
Buddhist Temple (“SLBT”), and the Japanese Community Preservation Committee. The results of this
Facilitation Process produced four concessions regarding the West Quarter and Japantown:
1. The Ritchie Group and Community would work together in good faith to schedule trash pickup to
not interfere with festivals, church services, etc.
2. Design changes to the West Quarter would reduce north-facing, back-of-house functions and
improve connectivity with Japantown Street
3. Regrading and repaving of the SLBT/JCC parking parcels would open up connections between
the West Quarter and Japantown
4. 10% of the annual tax increment collected from Block 67 would be reserved for public right -of-
way improvements to Japantown Street
At the completion of the Facilitation Process in November 2018, the Board was presented with a final
report including recommended next steps. The subsequent creation of a working group (“Working
Group”) allowed the Community to articulate a vision for Japantown, and the Board allocated $100,000
from CRA Downtown Place Making Funds for a consultant to develop a design strategy that would help
bring the Japantown vision to fruition.
The Agency engaged GSBS Architects (“GSBS”) as the consultant for the Japantown Design Strategy.
GSBS worked closely with the Working Group and City departments to incorporate technical
requirements of the street and merge those requirements with the Community’s ideas for the Design
Strategy. The resulting Japantown Design Strategy & Guidelines document was completed in 2021 and is
attached as Exhibit B.
ANALYSIS:
Japantown Streetscape Design
In early 2025, the Agency re-engaged GSBS to resume work on the 40% documents after a project pause
in 2024 as plans evolved for the Downtown Entertainment District. The Agency and GSBS worked with
the Community to organize two committees that would provide input on the 40% design. Both
committees met in June, July, and August 2025. The first committee, the Design Development
Committee, focused on the streetscape and related elements. The second committee, the Historical
Content Committee, focused on the placemaking and story-telling elements of Japantown that would be
incorporated into the street. Both committees included community members across the age and
experience spectrum and provided important feedback on the design and historical content as it relates to
Japanese culture, customs, and artistic motifs.
Due Diligence
As part of the 2025 efforts, GSBS and the Agency conducted technical review meetings of the Japantown
Streetscape Design with the City departments listed below to collect input on the Project:
• Planning and Zoning Department
• Public Utilities Department
• Transportation Department
• Engineering Department
• Urban Forestry
• Accessibility Department
• Streets Division
• Fire Department
• Sustainability Department
City input was valuable in assessing what was feasible and provided insight into the maintenance that
would be required should Japantown Street be constructed as designed – a curbless street with unique
Japanese cultural design elements and materials. GSBS worked through the City feedback and adjusted
the design to reflect what was indicated to be feasible from a maintenance perspective.
Construction / Maintenance Cost Estimates & Phasing
Construction
Construction of the Japantown infrastructure improvements has been estimated to cost $11,012,397. This
is inclusive of all required labor, earthwork, excavation, utility relocation, custom placemaking elements,
safety measures, contingency, insurance, etc. Exhibit D contains the itemized list of materials and
associated costs.
The leading project expense is the streetscape improvements, which include curb and gutter, concrete
material and stamping, cherry trees, seating, and placemaking elements like signs, plaques, displays, and
obelisks. This is estimated to cost $4,899,265.
The second leading project expense is site utility work. Should this project proceed to construction , 800
linear feet of 8-inch water line, 800 linear feet of fiber optic line, and 1,600 linear feet of underground
power would need to be relocated. Site utilities are estimated to cost $1,764,930.
The third largest expense is electrical and site lighting, the custom pedestrian poles, lighting conduits,
circuitry, and lockable power pedestals. These features are estimated to cost $886,750.
The fourth largest expense of earthwork is related to flattening the steep existing crown of Japantown
Street to better facilitate the annual festivals held on the street. This includes excavation, re-grading, street
construction, and traffic control. This is estimated to cost $805,951.
The residual $2,655,501 of project costs are split between the 10% design contingency fund, bonds and
insurance, general conditions, and overhead expenses.
Maintenance
Estimating future maintenance costs will require further conversations with various City departments
including Public Services, Public Utilities, and Public Lands, now that the 40% design specifies materials
and quantities for the Japantown Street improvements.
Phasing
GSBS created three phases of the overall Japantown vision so that the Community may apply for funding
one phase at a time. If funding were to be available for the entire project at once, it is also feasible to
construct all three phases at once.
Originally, each phase was intended to build on itself so that other than minor unavoidable changes to
pavement, as each phase is funded, the previous phase’s improvements would not need to be removed.
Each phase builds towards the final vision of Japantown Street. The originally planned phases are
detailed on page 41 of the Design Strategy & Guidelines document and generally include:
•Phase 1: Plant cherry trees along Japantown Street sidewalks and construct the entry
sidewalks on 200 West and 300 West
•Phase 2: Construct the midblock crossing and expanded pedestrian sidewalks
•Phase 3: Expand the sidewalks, construct the new parking layout, and narrow the drive
aisles.
Given the current complexities in the surrounding developments, moving forward with Phase 1 with the
exception of the entry sidewalk work, could be a suitable short-term improvement that would enhance the
existing Japantown Streetscape. Authorizing the planting and maintenance of up to 50 cherry trees in
concrete, above-ground planters in the park strips could be a positive action the Board could undertake to
beautify Japantown. Additional improvements could be installed, but we acknowledge that future
Entertainment District development might require the removal of these improvements.
Public Art
The CRA and Community are working with the Arts Council to design a mural that would go on the side
of the Multi-Ethnic Senior Housing Tower (“MESH”). There is a central protrusion of the MESH tower
facing Japantown Street that provides good visibility. Prior art discussions involved potentially renting art
from Japanese artists, but the Community has proposed and supported a mural instead, as that would
provide a more distinctive border of Japantown.
The CRA, Arts Council, and Community intend to organize a committee that will provide input on the
type of mural and artist selection beginning in November 2025. The Community is in favor of hiring an
artist from Matsumoto, Japan, as Matsumoto is one of Salt Lake City’s Sister Cities. The committee will
explore all art and artist options. The intent is to have a Spring 2026 reveal of the mural, dependent upon
the weather. The Nihon Matsuri festival is usually held in late April, and the mural would be a welcome
addition to the festival.
The CRA currently has $436,577 allocated towards Japantown public art. The FY25 budget allocated
$336,577 from the Central Business District ($300,000) and Block 67 ($36,577) for Japantown Art. When
combined with prior allocations of $100,000, the total available for art is $436,577. The Arts Council has
provided a rough cost of $15 to $35 per square foot for murals, which would total approximately $50,000
to $70,000 for a 60-foot by 30-foot mural on the MESH building – inclusive of design, revision,
materials, labor, and equipment. This estimate will be refined once the MESH wall dimensions are
confirmed and further planning is conducted. The high-rise nature of the mural would require scaffolding
and safety equipment, possibly putting the mural cost on the higher end of the price range.
The CRA intends to use a portion of the $436,577 Japantown public art allocation to commission the
temporary art, with plans to backfill the expenditure with a future budget appropriation to preserve the
opportunity for permanent Japantown public art pieces.
NEXT STEPS:
As described, the CRA will continue its current work with the Arts Council and Community to plan and
install the mural on the MESH building. CRA staff also supports proceeding with the Project and
determining next steps to preserve momentum. Throughout the Project, the CRA has received
Community input urging the City to not let attention or momentum on this Project lapse again. To
proceed with further design and construction, the project will require Board/City Council support,
clarification of the Entertainment District’s impact on Japantown Street, and additional funding.
Potential uses of additional funding could include one or more of the following options. These are not
mutually exclusive and there are likely more that could be considered.
•Allocate funding to construct short-term improvements that contribute to the beautification of
Japantown Street, such as the purchase of Japanese cherry trees, planters, and any placemaking
elements that would not be affected by Entertainment District construction. Funding should also
be identified for ongoing maintenance needs.
• Allocation of funding to complete additional design phases, as appropriate. Taking the project to
70% design phase would move it closer to “construction ready”. This would allow a future,
100% design phase to accommodate Entertainment District elements that are yet to be
determined, such as vehicular access points.
• Begin to identify funding sources to allocate for future construction costs to the Project as a sign
of commitment. Funding may also include large construction mitigation grant that could be
allocated to the SLBT and JCC to counter any Entertainment District disruptions.
The CRA and City may also consider holding off on determining any next steps until further details of the
Entertainment District are revealed in Summer 2026. The CRA would bring this project back before the
Board at that time.
PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION:
• November 12, 2024:
o The Board adopted the FY25 budget which contained $100,000 in construction document
funding, and $300,000 in public art funding.
• December 11, 2018:
o The Board adopted a resolution expressing its support for an ongoing working group of
Block 67 stakeholders, and a visioning process to articulate a vision for Japantown to be
funded with the $100,000 approved the by Board in the November 2018 Board meeting.
• November 27, 2018:
o The Board approved a motion for the $100,000 from CRA Downtown Place Making
Funds to be utilized for a Japantown design consultant.
• October 9, 2018:
o The Board conducted a straw poll for the City Council to vote to amend the Downtown
Master Plan to recognize Japantown. The Board also authorized the allocation of up to
$100,000 from CRA Downtown Place Making Funds to be utilized for a consultant for
Japantown.
• July 10, 2018:
o The Board adopted a resolution approving Block 67 boundary survey and authorizing a
draft CRA plan for Block 67.
o The Board asked CRA staff to facilitate discussions with the Ritchie Group, Salt Lake
County, and the Community about mitigating the impacts of the proposed Block 67
development on the Community.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Japantown Rendering
B. Japantown Design Strategy and Guidelines
C. Japantown 40% Construction Documents
D. Japantown Construction Cost Estimate
EXHIBIT A: 2025 JAPANTOWN RENDERING
EXHIBIT B: JAPANTOWN DESIGN STRATEGY & GUIDELINES
日本人
まち街
路計画
J A PA N T O W N
D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y
& G U I D E L I N E S
M A RCH 15, 2021
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
In This Guide
1. Executive Sum mar y and Preferred
Design Concept | 03
Executive Summary .....................................................................04
Original Ideas ..................................................................................05
Vision and Design Guidepost ...................................................06
Design Concept ..............................................................................07
Implementation ..............................................................................08
2. Background and History of Project | 09
History of Japantown: "Salt Lake's Nihonjin Machi" ..........10
History of Japantown to Present Day .....................................12
Facilitation Process and Working Group ...............................13
3. Community Engagement Approach | 15
Community Engagement Approach & Events ....................16
4. Design Approach | 21
Vision & Design Guideposts ......................................................22
Initial Design Concepts and Feedback ..................................26
Preferred Design Concept and Key Features ......................31
Placemaking Elements and Feedback ...................................34
5. Implementation and Operations | 40
Phasing and Cost of Improvements ........................................41
Best Practices for Management ...............................................49
Future of Salt Lake City's Japantown ....................................56
6. Appendices | 58
Existing Conditions Report ........................................................59
Photo Archive .................................................................................73
Detailed Implementation Cost Estimate ...............................73
Dear RDA Board of Directors:
We would like to thank you for providing the funding and staff support to the Japanese American Community of Salt Lake
City to hire a consulting team and complete a design concept process focused on the future of Japantown Street.
The design concept, guidelines, and phasing plan included in this document reflect the priorities and desires of the
participants in this process. Over the course of the 15-month process we coordinated closely with representatives of our
organizations and held three, well-attended Japanese American community sessions that guided the design concept you
see here.
On behalf of the Japanese Church of Christ, Salt Lake Buddhist Temple, and Japanese Community Preservation Committee
we submit this design concept, design guideline, and phasing plan. We look forward to working with you on the future of
Japantown Street.
Sincerely,
Senator Jani Iwamoto
Japanese Church of Christ
Japanese Community Preservation Committee
Rolen Yoshinaga
Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
Judge Raymond Uno
Japanese Community Preservation
Committee
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
Participants in Process
AGENCY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mayor Erin Mendenhall
SLC RDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ana Valdemoros, Chair
Dan Dugan, Vice Chair
Amy Fowler
Andrew Johnston
Darin Mano
James Rogers
Chris Wharton
SLC RDA PROJECT MANAGER
Corinne Piazza
THE WORKING GROUP
Judge Raymond Uno,
Japanese Community Preservation Committee
Senator Jani Iwamoto,
Japanese Church of Christ
Japanese Community Preservation Committee
Al Kubota, Japanese Church of Christ
Rolen Yoshinaga, Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
Troy Watanabe, Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
Brent Koga, Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
Kerri Nakamura, Salt Lake County
Ryan Ritchie, The West Quarter Development
Allison Rowland, SLC Council Office
SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS
(JAPANESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY
REPRESENTATIVES)
Metra Barton
Alison Yeh Cheung
Daniel Cheung
Shu Cheng
Lorraine Crouse
Dean Hirabayashi
Ethan Hirabayashi
Lisa Imamura
Mitch Imamura
Trey Imamura
Jean Irwin
Elise Mori
Elizabeth Ward
DESIGN & CONSULTING TEAM
Jesse Allen, GSBS Architects
Annaka Egan, GSBS Architects
Siobhan Locke, The Langdon Group
Valerie Nagasawa, GSBS Architects
Ted Nagata, Cultural Design Consultant
Christine Richman, GSBS Architects
Ben Rodes, GSBS Architects
Shoko Smith, GSBS Architects
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
第一章
Section One
Executive Summary and Preferred Design Concept
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
1 . E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y A N D P R E F E R R E D D E S I G N C O N C E P T
Executive Summary and
Preferred Design Concept
Executive Summary
As the result of a multi-year community driven design process,
the Japanese American Community of Salt Lake City developed a
design concept and approach to guide infrastructure investments
on Japantown Street in downtown Salt Lake City, 100 South
between 200 West and 300 West. The community-driven process
was guided and overseen by Japantown Representatives, GSBS,
and the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency (Agency) and
included the Japanese American community and area stakeholders.
The Agency and Salt Lake City Council provided staff support and
funding for the design process.
Over the course of the 15-month design process (including a
temporary pause due to the COVID-19 pandemic), the Design Team
met with the Japantown Representatives, a larger community-
based Subcommittee and the Japanese American Community to
generate a project vision, design guideposts and priorities, and
ultimately, a preferred design concept and phasing.
The Community donated more than 300 hundred hours of their
personal time to the design process by attending 66 hours of
Japantown Representatives, Subcommittee and Japantown
Community meetings.
Japantown Community Event 1 breakout sessions
A photo of small group notes from Japantown Community Event 1 A screen shot of a feedback session from Japantown Community Event 3
A screen shot from the virtual Japantown Community Event 2
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
1 . E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y A N D P R E F E R R E D D E S I G N C O N C E P T
Original Ideas for Japantown Street
Prior to kick off of the official design strategy process in
December 2019, a facilitation process took place among area
stakeholders of Japantown Street. A Working Group was created
to discuss proposed development and identify priorities for the
future of the street.
The Japantown Representatives identified the following ideas for
improvements to the public right of way of Japantown Street—
Figure 1-1. A check mark indicates it is included in the proposed
design concept.
Japantown’s Vision & Goals
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3Japantown’s Ideas
✓Create placemaking on Japantown Street
✓Design a festival street
✓Create a non-church related gathering place on
Japantown Street
✓Improve walkability of Japantown Street
✓Preserve future economic development and tourism
opportunities
✓Allow area churches to grow and thrive
✓Preserve and create something for future generations of
Japanese Americans
V I S I O N
G O A L S
✓Themed street lighting
✓Banners
✓Streetscape improvements
✓Entrance elements
✓Themed public art
✓Design guidelines
✓Connection to new development area
✓Landscaping
✓Midblock crosswalk
✓Bollards
✓Gathering areas
✓Electrical access
✓Remove the high crown on Japantown Street
✓Bury power lines
P L A C E M A K I N G
W A L K A B I L I T Y
F E S T I V A L S T R E E T
Figure 1-1: Japantown's Ideas
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
1 . E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y A N D P R E F E R R E D D E S I G N C O N C E P T
Vision & Design Guideposts
During the first Community Event, a visioning open house,
the Japantown Community identified important themes
and concepts for a vision to guide decision-making. The
Subcommittee then finalized the Vision and Design Guideposts
based on the Community’s input and a follow-up survey.
A place of remembrance and respect
A place that thrives over time
A place of inclusion
A P L A C E O F V I B R A N C Y
A P L A C E O F G A T H E R I N G
A P L A C E O F I N T R I N S I C B E A U T Y
A P L A C E O F G E N E R A T I O N S
A P L A C E O F S E N S E S
“I am who I am because of you”
Okage sama de
VISION STATEMENT
DESIGN GUIDEPOSTS
A full list of roles and responsibilities can be found on page 22-25.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
1 . E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y A N D P R E F E R R E D D E S I G N C O N C E P T
Design Concept
The preferred design concept brings together the preferred elements
identified in the Japantown Ideas List as indicated on Figure 1-1, page 5
and the design vision and guideposts of this design process. In addition
to the preferred elements and design vision, the Community indicated
that the design concept should also facilitate community festivals and
events as currently staged including required fire lanes and access
corridors, preserve the current number of on-street parking stalls, and
enhance pedestrian safety in a shared street design.
Figure 1-2: The Final Preferred Street Concept
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLEBUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
1 . E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y A N D P R E F E R R E D D E S I G N C O N C E P T
The design concept improves upon the current right-of-way
on Japantown Street by narrowing the road from four lanes of
travel to two lanes of travel with a center turn lane.
Implementation
There is no funding currently allocated to implement the design
concept. Funding for implementation will occur over time
based on funding requests from the Community to potential
funding partners including but not limited to the City, the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, the
State of Utah, and other private granting agencies.
The Best Practice Report beginning on page 49 recommends
creation or identification of management group as the official
and formal decision-making body relating to overseeing
implementation of the design concept, "Japantown
programming", and creating a reliable, consistent decision-
making process.
Table 1-1: Street Element Comparison
SECTION CRITERIA EXISTING RECOMMENDED
FESTIVALS
Obon Dancing Circle 45 ft 60 ft
Nihon Matsuri Booth #39 39
Nihon Matsuri Vendor Lane Location - 14’North North & South Sidewalk
Festival Fire Lane Location - 20’Street North Sidewalk
PEDESTRIAN WAY
Width - North Side 8 ft 40 ft1
Width - South Side 8 ft 40 ft1
Length - North Side 730 ft 730 ft
Length - South Side 712 ft 712 ft
PARKING STALLS
Total On Street Parking 48 50
Accessible Parking Stalls 0 2
ROADWAY
Total Lanes of Travel 4 2
Width - Lane of Travel 12 ft 10 ft
Turning Lane 0 1
Width - Turning Lane N/A 10 ft
Street Width - minus parking 60 ft 30 ft
STREET TREES Trees in Public Right of Way 17 42
RIGHT OF WAY Width 124 ft 124 ft
1At ends of street and mid-block only
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
Background and History of Project
Section Two
第二章
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
2 . B A C K G R O U N D A N D H I S T O R Y O F P R O J E C T
The History of Japantown:
"Salt Lake’s Nihonjin Machi
Salt Lake City’s Japanese Town"
Excerpt from Japanese Americans in Utah
Editor, Design & Layout by Ted Nagata
Published by JA Centennial Committee
Written by Haruko Terasawa Moriyasu
A historic aerial photograph of Japantown Street circa 1966
Source: Japanese Americans in Utah
When the Issei first came into Utah, most migrated to the mining,
railroad, and farming areas, and only those having business needs to
stay in an urban area settled in Salt Lake City. Support businesses such
as small restaurants, boarding houses, bath houses, and hotels were
initially established to meet the immediate needs of the incoming Issei
labor force. The major development of Nihonjin Machi, however, did not
occur until 1907 when the population had grown large enough in Salt
Lake City to require and to support the businesses that had begun to
be established.
By 1907, visible residential and commercial community settlements
became a recognizable geographic area in Salt Lake City. The location
bounded by South Temple, State, Third South and Seventh West Street,
became the major area of concentration for Japanese businesses.
Within this locality, noodle houses, hotels, rooming and boarding
houses, bath houses, variety stores, barber shops, confectioneries,
and tailors were started for the convenience of the Issei. In 1907,
Shiro Iida began publishing the Rocky Mountain Times, a tri-weekly
Japanese vernacular newspaper, to provide a communication network
throughout the Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming tri-state area. To fulfill
religious, social, and cultural needs, the Intermountain Buddhist Church
was established in 1912, and the Japanese Church of Christ in 1918. A
second newspaper, The Utah Nippo, a daily publication at its outset,
was started in 1914 by Uneo Terasawa. As increasing numbers of Nisei
needed to understand Japanese in order to communicate with their
parents, a Japanese language school was started in 1919. The regimen
for the Nisei children was to attend this school during the week after
attending the public schools or on Saturday. By the 1920 census, 403
Japanese, Issei and Nisei, were living in Salt Lake City. Commercial
activity by 1925 added pool halls, automobile repair shops, laundries,
cleaners, grocery and Japanese variety stores, photographers, jewelers,
produce stands, tofu manufacturers, a florist, and fish markets. Some
cleaners and a few restaurants were also scattered in other areas of the
city. Physicians, Drs. Numa and Ozawa, and Dr. Chikaraishi, a dentist,
also practiced in J-town during this period.
Most Japanese lived within the area and for some, living quarters were
set up in the back rooms of the business, and children grew up with the
sidewalk and the back alleys as their playground. Empty lots became
softball fields, and grassy islands to the wide Salt Lake City streets
were popular places to play football. Kick-the-can, hide and seek were
played on dirt surfaced streets in the middle of the blocks.
In 1925, both the Intermountain Buddhist Church and the Japanese
Church of Christ dedicated their new buildings that were to become
major centers of activity for the Salt Lake area Japanese population.
In the following decade, the Obon festival, a Buddhist observance
honoring the spirit of the dead - a memorial day, began to be held and
with the exception of the war years has become an annual tradition in
Salt Lake and Ogden. The Obon commemoration is characterized by
the use of colorful paper lanterns that light the area in which kimono-
clad dancers perform folk dances to recorded music accompanied by
drums and gongs.
The Japanese Church of Christ over the years has also been central to
the activities of their membership. They have sponsored an Oriental
Festival that has showcased cultural exhibits and programs, food
and games and more recently Japanese Art Festivals. The churches
continue to be central to Japanese-American activities.
For entertainment, the basement of the Buddhist Church served as a
theater for Japanese movies and kabuki productions enthusiastically
presented by local Issei who encouraged interested Nisei to participate
as performers. Some Nisei learned traditional classical Japanese dance
and to play the koto and shamisen, traditional Japanese musical
instruments, to perform for various programs during the year. Salt Lake
was a regular stop for various artists on tour from Japan, including
the first Japanese Madam Butterfly, Tamaki Miura. The observances of
Japanese tradition and culture were at their height during the years
preceding World War II.
The advent of the second World War and the voluntary evacuation
of people from the West Coast tripled the size of the Japanese
communities in Utah between 1942-1946. Salt Lake became the
temporary headquarters for two national organizations. The forced
evacuation of the Buddhist Churches of America Headquarters from
San Francisco to the Topaz Relocation Center made the Intermountain
Buddhist Church in Salt Lake the hub from which Church business
was conducted.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
2 . B A C K G R O U N D A N D H I S T O R Y O F P R O J E C T
Land Law, in effect from 1943 to 1947, to prohibit the Japanese from
purchasing land in the State of Utah. In an attempt to further curtail
Japanese-American activity, organizations and groups sent resolutions
to petition the City Commission to discontinue the issuance of city
business licenses. When this matter was brought before the Salt
Lake City Commission for a vote, L.C. Romney dared to cast the one
dissenting vote. Mayor Earl J. Glade appeared before the local JACL
chapter meeting and appealed for cooperation from Community to
withhold any new application until the hysteria passed. After the
war, the Mayor gratefully acknowledged this cooperation on many
public occasions.
From its inception to 1966, J-town became the gathering place for
Issei, Nisei, and Sansei in Salt Lake and areas surrounding the city.
First South was Japanese town for many who lived in the hotels and
apartments on the street and for the many who visited on a regular
basis. On any given day, it was not unusual to gather with friends at
Aloha Fountain, or to encounter them at the California Market, Family
Market, New Sunrise Fish Market and Sage Farm Market, or to dine
with them at the various restaurants on First South and West Temple,
or to talk to them as cars were being gassed up and serviced at Tats
Masuda’s Uptown Service Station or Pee Wee’s Conoco Service. This
When the National Japanese American Citizens League (JACL)
relocated here from San Francisco, Mayor Ab Jenkins personally
welcomed and escorted the caravan from the Nevada-Utah state line.
The Pacific Citizen, official newspaper of the organization, was
also published in Salt Lake City until 1952 when its officers were
moved to Los Angeles. The National JACL headquarters returned
to San Francisco the following year. The National JACL Credit
Union, however, has continued its operation from Salt Lake City
as originally established.
In spite of opposition from the communities at large, the number and
kind of businesses increased as Japanese from the West Coast settled
in Utah. Law offices, beauty salons, apartments, gas stations, produce
companies, florists and nurseries, appliance and jewelry stores, the
Fujimoto miso factory, and a bean sprout producer were added to
the businesses already in existence. The boundary now extended to
Fourth South and North Temple as businesses and families moved their
residences away from the center of Nihonjin machi.
The perception of a large group of Japanese becoming a permanent
fixture caused the Utah Legislature to hurriedly pass the Anti-Alien
was the one place where Japanese faces were the majority and
everyone felt a kinship and a sense of belonging.
In 1966, the move to create the Salt Palace Convention Center
decimated the two major blocks that had been the center of
Japanese-American residential and commercial activity. Many of the
businesses located on the blocks between South Temple and Second
South and West Temple and 2nd West closed permanently. Only
twelve - Sunrise Fish Market, Family Market, Aloha Cafe, California
Market, Pagoda, the Natl. JACL Credit Union, The Utah Nippo, Sage
Farm Market, Ami’s Book Store, Nisei Watch Shop, Uptown Service
Station, and Pee Wee’s - moved to other areas of the city. The
churches, a few apartments, and businesses on the surrounding blocks
remained, but the heart of the Japanese-American community was
gone. The Japanese-Americans no longer had a physical area they
could identify as their “place.” Of the original businesses identified as
being a part of “Japanese Town” only four - Sage Farm Market, the
Pagoda and Mikado Restaurants, and the National JACL Credit Union
continue to operate today. The Salt Lake Buddhist Temple and the
Japanese Church of Christ still function as a gathering place in their
original location on West First South. However, the chance encounters
in the variety of places on a street no longer occur.
Left: Store fronts along Japantown Street. Center: Mary and Kiyoko Nishida on 1st South in front of the New Kimpa Cafe. Right: Wallace Doi and Leo Kawa at the Aloha Snack Bar which was opened in 1947
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
2 . B A C K G R O U N D A N D H I S T O R Y O F P R O J E C T
History of Japantown to Present Day
Provided by the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
Figure 2-1: Project steps during the 2018 process
As discussed in the previous section, the original flourishing Japantown
area was largely dismantled by the construction of the Salt Palace
Convention Center in the 1960’s. The remaining heart of the Japanese
American Community that resided there was mainly comprised of the
Japanese Church of Christ and Salt Lake Buddhist Temple.
After several decades, the Salt Palace was expanded, and the Japanese
American Community organized to bring light to the negative
impacts the expansion would have on the remaining Japantown area
on 100 South between 200 South and 300 West. In 2005, because
of the Japanese American Community’s efforts to work with area
stakeholders, Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County signed a joint
resolution to recognize the unique cultural, economic, and social
contributions of the Japanese American Community, that future efforts
may support the area, and the need to mitigate the impacts of the Salt
Palace.
The Japanese American Community also formed the Japanese
Community Preservation Committee as an organization to represent
Japantown. The JCPC includes members of the JCC, SLBT, and
Japanese American Community. The JCPC worked with area
stakeholders on the mitigation of the Salt Palace impacts, including
lowering the allowed height of the expansion, adding place making
elements to the Salt Palace walls facing Japantown, commissioning
an artist to create decorative gates on the Salt Palace loading docks,
adding themed street lighting, and the addition of a buffer between
the JCC and Salt Palace which became a Japanese garden.
Also in 2005, the State Legislature passed SB 211: Funding for
Convention Facilities, that amended the Sales and Use Tax Act to
provide funding for convention facilities, and included language on
the mitigation of impacts of convention centers on the surrounding
community. Additional efforts included the addition of a Japantown
representative to the Salt Lake County Convention Facility Advisory
Board for continued collaboration, and that the County and JCPC
worked together to improve regulation of the loading docks and
staging process for Salt Palace events minimize impact on Japantown
Street.
In 2006, the County adopted a resolution
acknowledging the impacts of the Salt Palace
construction and expansion on Japantown, the
importance of the preservation and future of the
community, and encouraging the City to rename
100 S between 200 West and 300 West as
Japantown Street. Shortly after, the City adopted
a resolution recognizing the historical importance
of Japantown and officially named 100 S between
200 West and 300 West as Japantown Street.
Additionally, the JCPC worked with the Urban
Land Institute to draft ideas on how to improve the
vibrancy of the area.
In 2012, in the Centennial Celebration of the Gift of
Trees coordinated through the Denver office of the
Consulate General of Japan, thirteen Sakura trees
were planted across Salt Lake City, including trees
located at the SLBT, JCC, and the Japanese Garden
on Japantown Street. To present day, the Japanese
American Community holds Japantown festivals
throughout the year as cultural celebrations that
contribute to the vibrancy of Japantown, including
the Nihon Matsuri, Aki Matsuri, and Obon Festival.
On the south side of Japantown Street is Block
67, which is bound by 100 South and 200 South,
200 West and 300 West, and is of locational
importance within the downtown core. Up until
recently, it had seen limited to no new development
for several decades, and had a significant amount of underutilized and
vacant land. The Ritchie Group, in partnership with Garn Development
Company, had plans to develop a significant portion of Block 67 with
The West Quarter development project (“Development”) including
residential, retail, office, and hotel, with frontage on Japantown Street.
FOCUS ONE
O B J E C T I V E
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
C
E
S
S
Create a platform for Stakeholders to address concerns, identify
potential solutions, and nd amicable paths forward.
O
U
T
C
O
M
E
S
&
N
E
X
T
S
T
E
P
S
Mitigate Potential
Impacts of
Developments
SHORT TERM
ACTION ITEMS
SHORT TERM
ACTION ITEMS
FOCUS TWO
Articulate a Vision
for Japantown
LONG TERM
ACTION ITEMS
Response to
Design Concerns
Approval of
proposed items
for connectivity to
100 South
M A I N I T E M S
Establish Working
Group
Hire Consultant
Recognition in
Downtown Master
Plan
section 3a
Working Group leads
implementation of
Japantown action
items, with design and
street enhancement
elements based on
consultant plan
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
2 . B A C K G R O U N D A N D H I S T O R Y O F P R O J E C T
In 2018, the state legislature passed SB 128 slating $15,000,000
in transportation funds to be issued to the County for regionally
significant parking structures (“Transportation Funds”). As such, the
County made a request to the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
(“Agency”) to create a Community Reinvestment Area (“CRA” or
“Project Area”) for Block 67 and that the Agency would act as a pass
through for the Transportation Funds to The Ritchie Group, and the
tax increment collected from the Project Area created for The West
Quarter development would be used to repay the County on behalf of
The Ritchie Group.
Per the County’s request, in July of 2018 the Salt Lake City
Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors (“Board”) approved two
resolutions, including an Interlocal Agreement with the County for
the transfer of the $15,000,000 to the City for the construction of an
underground parking structure associated with The Ritchie Group’s
proposed West Quarter development, and to adopt the Block 67
boundary survey authorizing Agency staff to draft a CRA plan for
Block 67 to be considered for approval.
Members of the JA Community raised concerns with the Board that
the design of The West Quarter development did not take Japantown
into consideration. In particular, The West Quarter development
was largely designed with Japantown Street as back of house to
the Development’s operations, causing concern that similar to
the construction of the Salt Palace, Japantown Street would once
again lose vitality and functionality in the shadow of a neighboring
development. The JA Community requested that the Development
consider the existing uses of the street, such as church services, and
how it may contribute to the revitalization of Japantown.
In response, the Board asked the Agency to facilitate discussions
between The Ritchie Group, County (as a financial partner in The
West Quarter development as well as the owner of the Salt Palace
with frontage on Japantown Street), and the JA Community
(“Stakeholders”) about how to mitigate the potential impacts of The
West Quarter development on Japantown Street and how to enhance
the Japantown area (“Facilitation Process”). The Stakeholders agreed
that this was an opportunity for a collaborative effort to potentially
contribute to a renaissance of Japantown.
Facilitation Process
In August, 2018, the Agency began the Facilitation Process by
contracting with a professional facilitator, Siobhan Locke from The
Langdon Group (“Facilitator”), who specializes in working with
communities to resolve complex issues. The Facilitation Process took
place over several months and included a history of the work done
prior to the facilitation process to improve the area and creation of a
space where the Stakeholders could collaborate.
In October, 2018, Agency staff presented a process update to the
Board. According to the update the Japanese American Community
felt that Japantown Street had never been officially recognized on
City plans. The Japanese American Community felt that to do so now
would show that Japantown was a valued asset, as well as make future
developers aware of the significance of the street. Additionally, an
important next step was to set up a working group for Stakeholders to
continue to work together after the Facilitation Process. In response,
the Board voted for the Salt Lake City Downtown Master Plan to be
amended at a future date to recognize Japantown, and authorized the
allocation of $100,000 from Agency Downtown Place Making Funds
for a consultant for Japantown.
Working Group: Establishment
In January of 2019, the Working Group was established and made up
of the Stakeholders (“Working Group”) with Agency participation to
provide technical assistance. The Working Group identified goals and
objectives, operational logistics, plans for the consultant process, and
fine-tuned the mitigation steps between The Ritchie Group and JA
Community throughout the year. The Working Group also identified
three members of the JA Community to act as Japantown leadership
within the Working Group and act as a liaison for their community.
These included Judge Uno representing the JCPC, Senator Jani
Iwamoto representing the JCC and Rolen Yoshinaga representing the
SLBT (“Japantown Leadership”). Please see (page 2) for a full list of
participants in the Working Group.
Working Group: Block 67 North CRA & Mitigation
Steps Implementation
As Stakeholders found amicable paths forward, the Agency worked to
draft a CRA plan for Block 67. The originally proposed Project Area was
not possible due to the south side of the block being a collection area
for the Central Business District and committed to bond obligations.
The north half of the block was proposed, and the Board approved
the Block 67 North CRA in March, 2019 to facilitate the use of tax
increment financing as a funding mechanism to further the economic
development goals of the Salt Lake City Downtown Master Plan.
Next the Agency drafted the Interlocal Agreements for the use of
Project Area tax increment between the Agency and City, and Agency
and County, and included that the Agency would retain 10% of the tax
increment generated by the Development over the 20 year Project
Area for improvements to the public right of way on Japantown
Street. The Board approved the interlocal agreements in August and
September, 2019.
For the Tax Increment Reimbursement Agreement between the
Agency and The Ritchie Group, or the current owner during the term of
the agreement, the Agency incorporated the agreed upon mitigation
steps from the Facilitation Process, and received final approval from
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
2 . B A C K G R O U N D A N D H I S T O R Y O F P R O J E C T
Japantown Leadership on the final concessions for Japantown. They
included four main topics, including one, Good Faith Conditions
such as The Ritchie Group and JA Community working together to
schedule trash pink-up so as not to interfere with festivals, church
services, etc. The Good Faith Conditions require timely collaboration
between all parties for the conditions to be met. Two, Design Standard
Improvements such as design changes to the Development to reduce
north facing back of house functions and improve connectivity with
Japantown Street. Three, the Regrade/Repave of the JCC and SLBT
parcels to open up connectivity between the Development and
Japantown Street. These agreements were handled directly between
The Ritchie Group, JCC, and SLBT as private property owners, however
the Agency retained the right to keep $250,000 in tax increment for
improvements to the public right of way on Japantown Street if an
agreement could not be reached between the parties. Four, that 10% of
tax increment would be set aside for improvements to the public right
of way on Japantown Street. The Board approved the Tax Increment
Reimbursement Agreement in December, 2019. Since then, The
West Quarter development has begun construction and is slated for
completion in 2024.
Working Group: Japantown Design Strategy
Process & Next Steps
As the Working Group negotiated Japantown mitigation steps, they
also participated in the consultant selection process and worked
with Agency staff to create a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) for the
consultant (posted August 23 – October 7, 2019), participated in the
Selection Advisory Committee, held finalist interviews, and selected
GSBS Architects as the final consultant (October – November 2019).
The Agency drafted the RFP with key elements reflective of the
Working Group and Board’s goals (“Japantown Design Strategy”)
including community engagement, extensive due diligence to create
a technically obtainable design strategy while balancing the JA
community’s range of priorities, implementation and maintenance cost
estimates, and identification of Japantown best practices for future
management.
In January, 2020, the Japantown Design Strategy process with
GSBS was kicked off, then temporarily paused due to the COVID-19
pandemic, and resumed through completion in April 2021. The
Japantown Design Strategy is an important tool and next step for the
JA Community to begin applying for funding of the improvements they
would like to see. As it is a strategy, it is subject to change as it evolves
with funding and implementation steps.
Due to the estimated costs of the improvements requested, it is
anticipated that funding will not come from one source alone, but
will require many entities to participate including local, County, State,
and even national opportunities. The Block 67 North 10% set aside
of tax increment for improvements to Japantown Street mentioned
previously will become available over a 20 year timeframe, and
although may contribute to improvements, will not be enough to cover
the entire cost.
The Agency is proud to be a partner in this extensive community
engagement and visioning process, and looks forward to continuing
to work with the JA Community on their next steps to see their vision
come to fruition.
Judge Raymond Uno looking through exhibits during Nihon Matsuri
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
第一章
Section One
Executive Summary and Preferred Design ConceptCommunity Engagement Approach
Section Three
第三章
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
3 . C O M M U N I T Y E N G A G E M E N T A P P R O A C H
Japantown Community Engagement Approach
Overview
Over the course of twelve months, the
Japanese American Community in Salt Lake
City developed the Japantown Design Strategy
and Guidelines. The consultant-guided process
included extensive engagement and interaction
to identify the community’s long-term vision
and implementation phases to guide future
infrastructure investment on the street.
Engagement was structured in partnership with
the Community to incorporate several levels of
outreach as seen in Figure 3-1.
Community engagement moved from in-person
meetings to online events as a result of the
coronavirus pandemic during this time. Although
the approach moved from in-person to online,
community participation remained high and
engaged. All materials, a video recording, and
a follow-up survey was released following each
community event on the Agency website for
community review. The Subcommittee reviewed
the survey results following each event to identify
ideas and needs of the overall community.
The Community developed the design concept as
a result of three community events, an extensive
series of community meetings, and additional
survey feedback opportunities.
WHO:
Japantown Working Group
Representatives and Leadership as
identified in the Japantown facilitation
process, including members of the JCC, JCPC,
and SLBT.
ROLE:
- Guides project process and provides feedback.
- Selects subcommittee members.
- Provides initial review and feedback.
- Makes final recommendation on low-, medium-,
and high-cost preferred alternative design
concept and design guidelines.
SUBCOMMI EE
WHO:
The Subcommittee was created
by the Japantown Leadership
to provide additional insight
specifically for the Design Strategy
process, including members of the
JCC, JCPC, SLBT and Japanese
American Community.
WHO:
This is open to the broader
Japanese American community.
The Japantown Leadershiip and
Subcommittee may invite any
attendees they would like to
participate, as well as promote
participation in the engagement
activities.
R O L E S A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S
JAPANTOWN REPRESENTATIVES
ROLE:
+ Provides feedback to Working
Group Japantown Representatives
and consultant team.
+ Acts as project ambassadors
leading up to and during
community engagement
activities.
PARTICIPATION:
+ Participates in engagement activities.
+ Shares experiences and needs.
+ Reacts to draft materials and ideas.
WHO:
Salt Palace, Multi Ethnic
Housing, West Quarter
Development, Vivint Arena,
City Technical Reps.
PARTICIPATION:
+ Participates in one-on-one
stakeholder meetings.
JAPANESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY
AREA STAKEHOLDERS
WHO:
Japantown Representatives as identified
in the Japantown facilitation process and
Working Group creation, including members of
the Japanese Church of Christ (JCC), Japanese
Community Preservation Committee (JCPC),
and the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple (SLBT). This
group also includes three members specifically
identified as Japantown Leadership or
"captains" with one member each representing
the JCC, JCPC, and SLBT.
ROLE:
+ Guides project process and provides feedback.
+ Selects Subcommittee members.
+ Provides initial review and feedback.
+ Makes final recommendation on low-,
medium-, and high-cost preferred alternative
design concept and design guidelines.
Figure 3-1: Japantown Roles and Responsibilities
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
3 . C O M M U N I T Y E N G A G E M E N T A P P R O A C H
Japantown Representatives
The Japantown Representatives were identified in the Japantown
facilitation process and Working Group creation. The Working Group
included members of the Japanese Church of Christ (JCC), Japanese
Community Preservation Committee (JCPC), and the Salt Lake
Buddhist Temple (SLBT). This group also includes three members
specifically identified as Japantown Leadership or "captains" with
one member each representing the JCC, JCPC, and SLBT. Their
responsibilities included guiding the process and providing feedback,
selecting Subcommittee members, providing an initial review of
materials, and making a final recommendation for the low-, medium-,
and high-cost phasing in the final design strategy. Three Japantown
Representative meetings were held over the course of the project, and
Japantown Representatives also attended the Subcommittee meetings
and community events.
Subcommittee
The Japantown representatives invited members of the Japanese
American Community to participate on a Subcommittee to guide the
design process and facilitate outreach to the broader community.
Members included representatives from the Japanese Church of Christ,
Japanese Community Preservation Committee, Salt Lake Buddhist
Temple and the Japanese American Community. Their responsibilities
included providing feedback on materials and events to the Japanese
Representatives and consultant team and acting as ambassadors to
the design process and engagement activities. The Subcommittee met
seven times during the process, and Subcommittee members were
encouraged to attend the community events.
A photo from Japantown Community Event 1
Japanese American Community
Members of the Japanese American Community participated in three
community events. This group included community members from
the Japanese Church of Christ, Japantown Representatives, Japanese
Community Preservation Committee, Salt Lake Buddhist Temple, the
Subcommittee and other community members who share an interest in
the future of Japantown Street.
Area Stakeholders
This group includes Area Stakeholders including the Multi Ethnic
Housing Highrise, West Quarter Development, Vivint Arena, the Salt
Palace, and City Technical representatives.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
3 . C O M M U N I T Y E N G A G E M E N T A P P R O A C H
Timeline
Figure 3-2 outlines the community engagement
process leading to the development of the
Japantown Design Strategy and Guidelines.
Community engagement and outreach for the
Japantown Design Strategy and Guidelines
began in February 2020 with Community
Event 1 at the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple. Each
subsequent community event was followed
by a meeting of the Subcommittee to review
the takeaways from the event and to review
material revised by the Design Team to reflect
the comments and ideas received during
the event.
The Subcommittee reviewed the draft design
strategy which incorporated feedback from
the community event and prior Subcommittee
meetings. The Subcommittee also reviewed
material in preparation for the next community
event. This was repeated after each event
until the final meeting of the Subcommittee
in January 2021, when the group reviewed the
draft design strategy for recommendation to
the Japantown Representatives.
The Japantown Representatives met one last
time in mid-January to confirm the preferred
low-, medium-, and high-cost implementation
phases. This group provided feedback before
the presentation of the final draft design
concept to the RDA Board in April 2021.
Figure 3-2: Japantown Engagement Schedule
Community Event #1
PURPOSE:
Identify project vision &
guideposts.
PARTICIPANTS:
Japantown Representatives
Subcommittee
Japantown Community
FEBRUARY 8, 2020
Community Event #2
PURPOSE:
Review and provide input on
draft concepts.
PARTICIPANTS:
Japantown Representatives
Subcommittee
Japantown Community
OCTOBER 17, 2020
Community Event #3
PURPOSE:
Review and provide input on refined
and more detailed draft concepts.
PARTICIPANTS:
Japantown Representatives
Subcommittee
Japantown Community
DECEMBER 12, 2020
SUBCOMMITTEE AND JAPANTOWN
WORKING GROUP REVIEW:
Finalize Guideposts and internal
“Criteria” for design process.
SUBCOMMITTEE AND JAPANTOWN
WORKING GROUP REVIEW:
Review and provide input on draft
concepts for Community Event 2.
July 28, August 26, September 23
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS:
November 11, 2020
December 1, 2020
SUBCOMMITTEE AND JAPANTOWN
WORKING GROUP REVIEW:
Review and provide input on refined
and more detailed draft concepts
for Community Event 3.
October 28, 2020
SUBCOMMITTEE AND JAPANTOWN
WORKING GROUP REVIEW:
Review and provide input on draft final
concept and implementation strategy
for Working Group final review.
January 6, 2021
Working Group Final Review:
The Japantown Representatives
approved a low-, medium-, and
high-cost preferred options for
future implementation and
submittal to RDA Board.
JANUARY 11, 2021
RDA Board Review
RDA Board review - April meeting
STEP 1
STEP 4
STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4
COMMUNITY
CELEB TION
MAY, 2021*
* Subject to change
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
1 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
3 . C O M M U N I T Y E N G A G E M E N T A P P R O A C H
Community Event 1
February 2020
Location: Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
The Japantown Representatives hosted this event to provide an
introduction and background to the project and identify the key
elements for the design vision and guideposts. The Japantown
Representatives invited members of the Japanese American
Community, the Japanese Church of Christ, the Salt Lake Buddhist
Temple and the Japanese Community Preservation Committee to
participate in the three hour event. Following presentations on the
history of Japantown, the design process, and public placemaking,
participants completed small group exercises to identify community
goals and priorities for the street. Participants then identified
and prioritized recurring ideas and themes. The outcome of these
community exercises was a draft design vision and guideposts. The
draft was reviewed and revised by the Japantown Representatives and
Subcommittee to ensure accurate reflection of Community vision and
goals prior to Community Event 2.
Community Event 2
October 2020
Location: Virtual / Zoom
The Japantown Representatives and Subcommittee hosted this event
to review and generate input on the design vision and guideposts
developed as a result of Community Event 1. Participants also provided
feedback on three different design concepts for Japantown Street based
off of the 2018 Ideas list and Community Event 1. This event was open
to the Japanese American Community, Japanese Church of Christ, the
Salt Lake Buddhist Temple and the Japanese Community Preservation
Committee.
Following a presentation outlining the design process and providing
the draft vision and guideposts, community members were divided into
small break-out groups to discuss the draft materials. Participants gave
feedback and input to the design team in the break-out groups and when
the larger group was reconvened.
A discussion and examples of what defines the public realm prepared
participants to evaluate three preliminary design concepts reflective of
the design vision and guideposts. Participants again broke into small
groups to review the concepts and provide ideas and feedback. The
images above show Japanese American Community feedback through
an interactive Zoom format.
Community members unable to attend the Saturday morning event
reviewed meeting materials, a recording of the meeting, and completed
a questionnaire hosted on the Salt Lake City RDA website. The Design
Team incorporated feedback and ideas from the questionnaire and
event into the design concepts. The Subcommittee reviewed the
updated concepts following Event 2.
Community members identified the following preferred outcomes for
the redesign of Japantown Street:
+ Pedestrian and visitor safety
+ Preserve existing on street parking
+ Accommodate current festivals
+ Improve the pedestrian environment
+ Create a sense of place and uniqueness
+ Meet technical criteria for Salt Palace dock access, fire lane access,
and City engineering design
Small group work during Japantown Community Event 1 A screenshot of othe preferred street concept shape from Japantown Community Event 2 A screenshot from Japantown Community Event 2
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
3 . C O M M U N I T Y E N G A G E M E N T A P P R O A C H
Community Event 3
December 2020
Location: Virtual / Zoom
Community members reviewed and provided input on refined and
more detailed draft concepts for Japantown Street This event was
open to the Japanese American Community, Japanese Church of
Christ, the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple and the Japanese Community
Preservation Committee.
During this event, the Design Team presented the proposed design
including festival dimensions, pedestrian way dimensions, parking stall
counts, roadway dimensions, street trees, and right of way dimensions.
Table 3-1 summarizes the elements on the street that contribute to
Community-identified preferred outcomes identified in Community
Event 2.
The Design Team reviewed precedent images from public spaces
around the country, and Japan, to illustrate how streetscape elements
can be used to create a sense of place. These placemaking elements
A screenshot from Japantown Community Event 3
Table 3-1 : Elements on Japantown Street
SECTION CRITERIA EXISTING RECOMMENDED
FESTIVALS
Obon Dancing Circle 45 ft 60 ft
Nihon Matsuri Booth #39 39
Nihon Matsuri Vendor Lane Location - 14’North North & South Sidewalk
Festival Fire Lane Location - 20’Street North Sidewalk
PEDESTRIAN WAY
Width - North Side 8 ft 40 ft
Width - South Side 8 ft 40 ft
Length - North Side 730 ft 730 ft
Length - South Side 712 ft 712 ft
PARKING STALLS
Total On Street Parking 48 50
Accessible Parking Stalls 0 2
ROADWAY
Total Lanes of Travel 4 2
Width - Lane of Travel 12 ft 10 ft
Turning Lane 0 1
Width - Turning Lane N/A 10 ft
Street Width - minus parking 60 ft 30 ft
STREET TREES Trees in Public Right of Way 17 42
RIGHT OF WAY Width 124 ft 124 ft
included art elements, history, and storytelling elements, and functional
placemaking elements like light poles and benches. This also included
patterns and colors, entry elements and opportunities for art.
Participants discussed the importance of history, storytelling and art
elements in fulfilling the vision and guideposts for the street in small
group sessions. The large group reassembled and the Design Team
asked participants to annotate on their screens what they heard in their
breakout sessions.
The group reviewed functional placemaking elements and took part in
another breakout and annotation session to discuss which functional
elements best fulfill the vision and guideposts and create a sense of
place on Japantown Street.
Community members unable to attend the Saturday morning event
reviewed meeting materials, a recording of the meeting, and completed
a questionnaire hosted on the Agency website. The Design Team
incorporated feedback and ideas from the questionnaire and event into
the final design concept. The Subcommittee reviewed the updated
concept following Event 3.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
第一章
Section One
Executive Summary and Preferred Design ConceptDesign Approach
Section Four
第四章
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Design Approach
Vision and Design Guideposts
The vision statement guides project design and provides
necessary direction for decision-making throughout the
design process. The Subcommittee dedicated great thought
and deliberation to the vision statement, to capture both the
Community’s reason for existence and its promise for the future.
It is motivating and inspirational while reflecting the Community’s
core values and culture.
The five design guideposts provide goals and plans for
implementing the vision through the design concept and
guidelines. Each guidepost begins with “A Place of…” to evoke
the aspirations of the Japanese American Community and the
physical characteristics that will make Japantown a distinct,
identifiable and valued place within the city.
A place of remembrance and respect
A place that thrives over time
A place of inclusion
A P L A C E O F V I B R A N C Y
A P L A C E O F G A T H E R I N G
A P L A C E O F I N T R I N S I C B E A U T Y
A P L A C E O F G E N E R A T I O N S
A P L A C E O F S E N S E S
“I am who I am because of you”
Okage sama de
Design Guideposts
Vision Statement
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
A P L A C E O F G E N E R A T I O N S
GOAL
Memory and transformation that honors the past and inspires
the minds and hearts of future generations.
PLAN
Use of contemporary and historical design elements, design the
street and create spaces for festivals and activity for all ages.
A P L A C E O F G A T H E R I N G
GOAL
Celebration. A place that feels like home, a place
to meet and welcome new friends.
PLAN
A safe street designed for festivals and celebrations
that showcases Japanese and Japanese American culture and arts.
Create opportunity for pop-up interaction.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
A P L A C E O F V I B R A N C Y
GOAL
Create a place of vibrancy that supports commerce
and brings life to the street.
PLAN
Provide elements that bring people into the area
and creates visual interest.
A P L A C E O F
S E N S O R Y E X P E R I E N C E S
GOAL
Include sights, sounds, textures, and smells that evoke a
memorable experience of the Japanese and Japanese American
aesthetic.
PLAN
Use streetscape elements and landscape materials
with a variety of scales and textures.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
A P L A C E O F
I N T R I N S I C B E A U T Y
GOAL
Draw on existing beauty of the space and place.
PLAN
Provide the infrastructure and purpose to draw people
and activity to the street and showcase Japanese and Japanese
American design approaches. Attract the broader community
to support activities in nearby areas of downtown.
Source: Salt Lake Nihon Matsuri Committee
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Initial Design Concepts and Feedback
This project focuses on the public realm, defined as the publicly
owned places and spaces that belong to and are accessible by
everyone. Before automobiles became the dominant form of
transportation, streets were active mixes of pedestrians, shoppers,
vendors with their wagons, horse-drawn carriages and bicycles. The
public realm was a natural place to meet and interact. Though 20th
century street design took a vehicle-centered approach, there has
been a movement in recent decades to reallocate the public realm,
putting more focus on people and less on vehicles. On Japantown
Street, the public realm includes sidewalks, park strips, and street
parking, but the majority of its width is dedicated roadway. The
public realm here is used not only for getting from one place to
another, however, but for festivals, socializing and recreation.
Three preliminary street design concepts, based on the
Community's initial ideas, were presented to the Community for
feedback. They illustrate alternative ways to change the balance
of use in the public realm and give more space to pedestrians,
gathering areas and other people-focused uses, while:
+ Meeting the technical needs for traffic volume
+ Maintaining Salt Palace truck access, and
+ Implementing Community’s preliminary list of goals and priorities,
including placemaking and preferred festival layouts
+ Meeting City code and requirements
In each concept, the number of drive lanes has been reduced from
four lanes to two, one in each direction.
18’16’
PEOPLE SPACE PEOPLE SPACEANGLED PARKINGVEHICULAR SPACE
90’ HARDSCAPE WIDTH
124’ ROW
90’
Figure 4-1: Existing 2020 Japantown Street and Roadway Section
JAPANTOWN STREET / 100 SOUTH
3
0
0
W
E
S
T
20
0
W
E
S
T
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Option A
The first concept presented, Option A, maintains a typical straight-
line street edge, with one vehicle lane in each direction (rather than
two) and a center turning lane. It creates considerably wider sidewalks
to accommodate a double row of trees on each side, planted in tree
wells, to create an urban tree-lined walk. The north and south sides
of the street are connected by a mid-block crossing. Street parking is
accommodated in stalls parallel to the curb, rather than the combination
of angled and parallel stalls that currently exist. (Figure 4-2)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
35’35’54’
94’ HARDSCAPE WIDTH
124’ ROW
VEHICULAR SPACEPEOPLE SPACE PEOPLE SPACE
Figure 4-2: Japantown Street Concept Option A and Roadway Section
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Option B
The second concept presented, Option B, creates two ovular street
areas, one in front of each church, joined by a wide mid-block
crossing. The entries to the street, at the west and east ends, are
narrowed to signify a place that is special and unique within the
city. This concept emphasizes the presence of the two churches and
the connection they share as anchors of the Japanese American
Community. It enhances the mid-block portion of the street, creating a
widened pedestrian area and generous raised crosswalk that becomes
a literal and figurative connector. This concept maintains angled
parking in the ovular street areas. (Figure 4-3)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT B
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
13’26’13’72’
98’ HARDSCAPE WIDTH
124’ ROW
VEHICULAR SPACE PEOPLE SPACE PEOPLE SPACE
Figure 4-3: Japantown Street Concept Option B and Roadway Section
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACESALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
2 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Option C
The third concept presented, Option C, offsets the west and east
street entries and creates as a “zig-zag” movement through the
block that slows traffic and creates interest. The offset results in
wide sidewalk areas in front of each of the two churches, creating
plaza-like spaces for each. Similar to the previous concept, it
creates a wide mid-block crossing. The center turning lane is
omitted in this concept. Parking is accommodated in stalls parallel
to the curb. (Figure 4-4)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT C
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
29’51’14’
110’ HARDSCAPE WIDTH
124’ ROW
PEOPLE SPACE PEOPLE SPACEVEHICULAR SPACE
Figure 4-4: Japantown Street Concept Option C and Roadway Section
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACESALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Feedback
The Community expressed a strong preference for Concept
Options B and C, both of which alter the shape of the street,
create narrowed street ends with the potential to slow traffic,
and offer a significant mid-block crosswalk to facilitate
movement between the churches and improve pedestrian safety.
They favored the additional sidewalk space in front of the two
churches afforded in Option C but recognized the loss of on-
street parking, and width for festivals and turning lane for trucks
to queue before entering the Salt Palace loading dock.
The Community’s concerns focused on maintaining street
parking capacity, maintaining enough street width to
accommodate the Obon, Nihon Matsuri, and other festivals such
as the Aki Matsuri (largely as they are set up today), creating a
universally accessible street without barriers, and maintaining a
safe and non-threatening environment.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T SJ A P A N T O W N /日 本 人 まち - I N I T I A L S T R E E T D E S I G N C O N C E P T S
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT A
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
EXISTING
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLELUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
STREETPEDESTRIAN WALKWAY GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT B
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME:JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER:2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN |日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
CONCEPT C
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH / JAPANTOWN STREET
SHARED ROADWAY FOR
CAR/BIKE/TRUCKS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY & PLAZA
LIGHTS W/ BANNERS, BOLLARDS,
WAYFINDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ART & HISTORIC ELEMENTS
POSSIBLE ENTRY
ELEMENT LOCATION(S)
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GRASS
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
& PLAZA EXTENSION
POSSIBLE ART ELEMENTS
SALT PALACE
STR EET DESIGN CURR ENT
OPTION A
OPTION B
OPTION C
Figure 4-5: Japantown Street Concept Options
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Preferred Design Concept
The Community’s feedback on the initial design concepts led to
a deeper dive into the lay-out and access requirements for the
Obon Festival and Nihon Matsuri, the two largest festivals held on
Japantown Street. Though the Community acknowledges they occur
but two weekends during the year, they are culturally and traditionally
significant and successful in their ability to bring the Japanese
American Community together and share their culture with the public.
The layout and activities have been worked out and refined over the
years as the festivals have grown. However, because there were few
documented festival layout maps, three-dimensional digital models
were created to help the Community consider how to balance festival
needs with the year round uses of the street. It should be noted that
the churches plan to hold other street festivals also. They are smaller
than the two large festivals that the concept was designed around and
should be able to fit accordingly. More detail about the festivals can be
found in the Existing Conditions Appendix.
Figure 4-6: Final Preferred Design Concept
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLEBUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Figure 4-7: Final Street Concept with Nihon Matsuri Figure 4-8: Final Street Concept with Obon Festival
Constraints on the street redesign include:
+ Required fire truck access through the street during festivals
+ A clear lane for vendor vehicles to access the booths during the
Nihon Matsuri
+ Access to the many driveways along the street, including those into
the surface parking lots owned by the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple,
the Japanese Church of Christ, and the adjacent lot serving the
Multi-Ethnic Housing facility, as well as service and parking structure
entries to the West Quarter Development.
+ Access into the Salt Palace loading dock
+ Minimum width of unobstructed festival street for the Obon dancing
circle and seating
+ Maintaining street parking stall capacity while allowing for temporary
festival parking, in the middle of the west half of the street
Conclusion
Design Concept B proved to be the most successful at realizing the
design guideposts while providing for the functional needs of the street
both day-to-day and during festivals, and maintaining street parking
capacity. It was therefore, the Community’s preferred concept.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Key Features of the Design Concept
+ EAST AND WEST STREET ENTRIES
The narrowed street entries identify and define Japantown Street
and provide generous paved areas for street trees, entry monuments,
sculpture and other placemaking elements.
+ MID-BLOCK CROSSING
The wide mid-block crosswalk functions as a safe crossing and
enhanced pedestrian zone that unifies the two sides of the street and
provides space for streetscape, history and story-telling elements.
The paving surface is raised to match the sidewalk and provide a
barrier free crossing for all who visit the street
+ STREET TREES
The streetscape features Japanese Cherry trees, as identified on the
SLC Urban Forestry approved list of tree species and types. They are
located in double rows at the street ends and mid-block, to create
a pleasant pedestrian experience with shade and colorful blossoms
that are a recognizable element of the Japanese landscape.
Figure 4-9: Features of the Preferred Design Concept
+ LANDSCAPE PLANTING
Opportunities for plants and groundcover are primarily at the edges
of the right-of-way to maintain all of the clear access requirements
noted above. Plants and groundcover are opportunities to reinforce
the design vision and guideposts and to make a visual connection to
the Japanese Community Garden on the north side of the street.
+ STREET EDGE
The use of paving at the street edge, rather than planted park strip,
allows fluid movement between the sidewalk and street for greater
flexibility during festivals and events. The Subcommittee had lively
discussions about the potential for a curb-less street design that
utilizes linear trench drains with decorative grates and bollards to
delineate the transition from pedestrian to vehicular zones. This idea
was well-received as a way to make the street universally accessible
and ultimately, more flexible. The preferred concept works either as a
curb-less street or with traditional curb and gutter.
+ FESTIVAL CONSIDERATIONS
Fire Truck Access Lane
A 20-foot-wide fire truck access lane is provided on the north side
of the street along the sidewalk, between the rows of trees and
vertical placemaking elements. The lane requires 13 foot 6 inches
of overhead clearance and rolled curbs where the lane crosses the
ends of the street and the raised mid-block crossing. Paving at the
fire truck access lane is required to be HS-20 rated construction to
accommodate the firetrucks and semi-trucks driving over it.
Vendor Vehicle Access
A 14-foot-wide vendor access lane is provided on the south side of
the street along the sidewalk, between the rows of trees and vertical
placemaking elements. Rolled curbs at the street ends and the mid-
block crosswalk will be required. The vendor lane can also provide
access to the parking lots on the south side of the street during the
festivals.
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT(S)
FIRE TRUCK ACCESS LANE
(DURING FESTIVALS)
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT(S)JAPANESE CHERRY TREES
VENDOR VEHICLE ACCESS
PAVED STREET EDGE
MID-BLOCK CROSSING
LANDSCAPE PLANTING
LUMBINI’S GARDENRITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
20’ WIDE FIRE ACCEESS
10’ VENDOR COOKING AREA
14’ WIDE VENDOR/ PARKING ACCEESS
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Placemaking Elements
Japantown was once marked by the storefronts and signage of
its businesses and amenities and the activity of its residents and
patrons. Today, it is identified primarily by the architecture of the
Salt Lake Buddhist Temple and the Japanese Church of Christ,
and the landscape of the Japanese Community Garden. An
important part of the Japantown Design Strategy is a series of
new placemaking elements that tell its history and story, create a
safe and people-oriented streetscape, and bring opportunities for
place-inspired art.
By virtue of their look and feel, shapes, colors, textures, patterns,
and materials, these placemaking elements will help realize the
Community’s vision for Japantown as a place of remembrance,
importance and inclusion - one that thrives over time. They
will add vibrancy, support multi-generational use, encourage
gathering, engage the senses and bring intrinsic beauty to this
unique place in downtown Salt Lake City.
Figure 4-10: Japanese patterns designs and meaningsJapanese-American owned storefronts and signagae along Japantown Street
Source: Japanese Americans in Utah
Uroko (Fish Scales)
Shippo (Seven Treeasures)
Kojitsunagi (Interlaced Ko)
Seigaiha (Ocean Waves)
Ichimatsu (Laid Stones)
Yagasuri (Arrow Feathers)
Kikko (Turtle Shell)
Asanoha (Hemp Leaves)
Kids & babies’ healthy growth
and strength
Turtle like longevity
Aiming for a target and not to re-
turn—marriage & graduation
Prosperity of family,
business and projects
Used for ancient court dancers
clothing—prosperity & peace
Infinite pattern—Good fortune
Prosperity of descendants,
relationships and harmony
Used for Samurai’s kimono as a
talisman to protect themselves
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
The placemaking elements identified for this
project are grouped in three categories:
+ Art Elements
+ History and Story-telling Elements
+ Functional Streetscape Elements
Sketches and photographs of varying design
approaches were presented to the Community.
They offered feedback about how the ideas
resonated with the vision and design guideposts
and identified preferred approaches.
Figure 4-11: Placemaking Elements in the Preferred Concept
FUNCTIONAL
PL ACEMAKING
ELEMENT S :
+ Trees and landscape planting
+ Benches
+ Bollards
+ Tree grates
+ Utility elements such as
manhole covers and
trench drains
HISTORY & STORY-
TELLING ELEMENTS:
+ His torical markers and plaques
+ Culturally-inspired patterns,
colors, textures
+ Banner s and other graphic or
photo imagery
ART ELEMENT /
ENTRY MONUMENT:
+ Entry monuments or iconic
sculpture at ends of street
+ Art integrated with other
placemaking elements
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Feedback
Art Elements
The Community indicated a preference for entry elements that are
scaled appropriately to the street, unique to this place and make clear
it is Japantown. Three general forms were illustrated as possibilities
for the entry elements - arches or frames, vertical forms and sculptural
forms. Feedback indicated that vertical and sculptural elements are
preferred to arch or frame elements. Entry elements should celebrate
the people of Japantown and should not be confused with specific
religious symbols such as Torii gates. The Community expressed strong
interest in giving preference to Japanese American artists, particularly
those from the Community.
Figure 4-12: Entry Element Locations on 200 West and 300 West
Figure 4-13:
Entry Element Concepts
Photo of Koi Nobori - An Example of Japanese Art Elements
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
VERTICAL ELEMENT SCULPTUR AL
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
History and Story-telling Elements
The Community is deeply committed to telling the story of Japantown,
thereby honoring its pioneers, sharing its contribution to the city, and
countering collective indifference while looking toward the future.
Interpretive elements should be vertical, above-ground elements that
people can see or read without looking down. In-ground elements can be
included as well but should be thoughtfully vetted and respectful to the
content. Elements should be located on both the north and south sides
of the street to create a sense of order and balance. They should also be
durable for longevity on the street.
Examples of History and Story-Telling Elements
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
Functional Streetscape Elements
Streetscape elements should be consistent in look and feel, striking a
balance between the modern and traditional aspects of Japanese design
and aesthetics. The Community wishes to capture and make visible the
care and detail embodied in Japanese culture and practices. For example,
hand-painted manhole covers can be found throughout the streets of
Japan that celebrate icons of the neighborhood or district.
Existing light poles on the street are sparsely located and inconsistent in
design. New light poles with banner arms are a high priority. In addition
to providing a well-lit, safe environment, they provide opportunity for
identifying the street, celebrating the history and culture, and advertising
festivals and events. All new light poles must have power outlets in the
bases to facilitate the staging of festivals.
Figure 4-14: Examples of Light Fixture Options Figure 4-17: Examples of Paving Options
Figure 4-16: Examples of Seating Options
Figure 4-15: Examples of Bollard Options
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
3 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
4 . D E S I G N A P P R O A C H
There are many opportunities along the street to incorporate patterns
whether in the paving, painted crosswalks, tree grates or trench drains
covers. Traditional Japanese patterns are subtle and beautiful ways
to incorporate cultural symbols, branding and detail. An idea the
Community embraced enthusiastically is an etched or painted pattern
in the street that reflects the Obon dancing circle. See Figure 4-17 on
previous page.
The diagram, shown in Figure 4-19 below, was made to show locations
available for different kinds of placemaking elements with respect to the
clearances required for festival layouts, fire department access, vehicle
access and existing uses such as driveways. Fixed elements, such as
light poles, trees, benches and vertical monuments, must not be placed
within or encroach upon the required clear areas, as indicated in the
color legend.
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
124’ ROW
Figure 4-19: Placemaking Opportunities
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
RITCHIE DEVELOPMENT
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
124’ ROW
GREEN SOFTSCAPE
TREES/GROUND COVER
AVAILABLE AREA FOR VERTICAL
PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS AND
LIGHTPOLES
AVAILABLE AREA FOR
PLACEMAKING ELEMENTS
IN PAVING
Plants Considerations:
+ Periwinkle
+ Jasmine
+ Japanese Iris
+ Wisteria
+ Chinese Yellow Bamboo
+ Cherry Trees
Figure 4-18: Landscape
FIRE TRUCK
ACCESS LANE
VENDOR VEHICLE
ACCESS LANE
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
第一章
Section One
Executive Summary and Preferred Design ConceptImplementation and Operations
Section Five
第五章
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
A phased implementation strategy allows the design to be constructed
as funds become available, while maintaining the integrity of the
full vision. Key to the phasing strategy is a sequence of work that
anticipates the full build-out and minimizes the necessity to remove
and rebuild improvements from one phase to the next. The phases
were developed with the goal of realizing some of each type
of improvement in the earliest phase – functionality, safety, and
placemaking – so that tangible benefits are there from the start.
The phasing plans in Figure 5-1 illustrate the sequence of work and
outline the elements included in each phase. The associated costs
include implementation and maintenance and are broken out by phase
in a summary estimate. Costs are subject to change.
Phasing and Cost of Improvements
Phase One
Phase Two
Phase Three
Source: Salt Lake Nihon Matsuri Committee
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
Figure 5-1: Phasing Plans for Implementation
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Phase One
+ Reduce traffic lanes to two
+ Implement narrowed street entries with
entry elements, paving, lightpoles, trees,
painted crosswalk
+ Remove the crown in the roadway
+ Plant mid-block trees with protective curbs
SECTION ITEM QUANTITY IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
DEMOLITION 78,367 SF $284,984 $356,230
PAVING
Concrete paving at street entry 4,200 SF
$501,802 $627,253
Decorative concrete paving at street entry 3,100 SF
Curb ramps with warning pavers 6
Decorative painting at crosswalk 2,600
Remove crown, repave, restripe existing asphalt
roadway 63,000
TREES &
LANDSCAPE
Street Trees - Cherry 16
$265,585 $331,981
Soil preparation 544 CY
Irrigation connections 16
Tree grates 16
Groundcover around trees
Curbing
STREET
LIGHTING Street light poles with banner arms, power 4 $48,000 $60,000
SECTION ITEM QTY.IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
ART, HISTORY,
STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Street entry elements 2
$258,000 $322,500
Interpretive signage TBD
SITE FURNISHINGS
Benches 8
$50,633 $63,291
Manhole covers 2
UTILITIES
Bury power lines
$685,702 $857,128
Storm drainage
modifications
Traffic light modifications at
300 West
Other utiilty modifications
PHASE ONE TOTAL COST RANGE $2,094,706 $2,618,383
Costs subject to change
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
Table 5-1: Phase One Cost Estimate
Figure 5-2: Phase One of the Preferred Concept
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Phase Two
+ Implement the full mid-block crossing,
including paving, trees, planting, painted
crosswalk, history and story-telling elements,
lightpoles, bollards, manhole covers
SECTION ITEM QUANTITY IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
DEMOLITION 27,987 SF $139,923 $174,904
PAVING
Grading 27,987 SF
$370,095 $462,619
Concrete paving at street mid-block crossing 18,281 SF
Decorative concrete paving at street mid-block
crossing 7,781 SF
Decorative painting at mid-block crossing 5,517 SF
Curb and gutter
Warning pavers 364 LF
TREES &
LANDSCAPE
Street Trees - Cherry 9
$133,412 $166,765
Soil preparation 225 CY
Irrigation connections 9
Tree grates 9
Landscape patching, new 1,559 SF
Curbing
STREET
LIGHTING
Street light poles with banner arms, power 2
$119,000 $148,750
Pedestrian light poles with banners arms, power 12
SECTION ITEM QTY.IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
ART, HISTORY,
STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Interpretive signage TBD See
allowance
SITE FURNISHINGS
Benches 13
$138,997 $173,746Bollards19
Manhole covers 10
UTILITIES
Bury power lines
$468,001 $585,001
Storm drainage
modifications
Traffic light modifications at
300 West
Other utility modifications
PHASE TWO TOTAL COST RANGE $1,369,428 $1,711,785
Costs subject to change
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
Table 5-2: Phase Two Cost Estimate
Figure 5-3: Phase Two of the Preferred Concept
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Phase Three
+ Implement the full roadway with new curb
and gutter, paving, trees, planting, lightpoles,
manhole covers
SECTION ITEM QUANTITY IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
DEMOLITION 54,803 SF $246,271 $307,839
PAVING $557,538 $696,923
Grading 54,803 SF
Concrete paving at roadway 25,908 SF
Concrete paving at sidewalk 22,097 SF
Decorative concrete paving 2,327 SF
Curb and gutter 1,009 SF
TREES &
LANDSCAPE
Street Trees - Cherry 17
$220,106 $275,133
Soil preparation 225 CY
Irrigation connections 17
Tree grates 17
Landscape patching, new 1,559 SF
STREET
LIGHTING
Pedestrian light poles with banners
arms, power 17 $161,500 $201,875
SECTION ITEM QTY.IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
ART, HISTORY,
STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Interpretive signage TBD See allowance
SITE FURNISHINGS Manhole covers 17 $14,255 $17,819
UTILITIES
Bury power lines
$491,392 $61,4240
Other utility modifications
PHASE THREE TOTAL COST RANGE $1,691,062 $2,113,829
Costs subject to change
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
Table 5-3: Phase Three Cost Estimate
Figure 5-4: Phase Three of the Preferred Concept
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
IMPLEMENTATION
COST RANGE
Phase I Construction Cost Estimate $2,094,706 $2,618,383
Phase 2 Construction Cost Estimate $1,369,428 $1,711,785
Phase 3 Construction Cost Estimate w/Curbs $1,691,062 $2,113,828
Add for Curbless Design $592,916 $741,145
Allowance for History/Storytelling Elements $145,125 $181,406
Allowance for Art $64,500 $80,625
Grand Total Construction Cost Estimate Range $5,957,737 $7,447,172
The design concept includes the possibility of developing a curbless
roadway edge. The cost estimate for improvements anticipates
traditional curb and gutter as the base condition and includes an
added cost to implement a curbless design. The curbless design
includes added utility costs and a trench drain in place of gutters. It
also includes bollards along the entire street edge, not just the mid-
block crossing, for pedestrian safety.
Notes:
1. Contractor mark-ups and design contingency included in numbers
2. Estimate priced in today's dollars. Escalation has not been included.
Add 4% per year for escalation.
3. Costs are subject to change.
Photo of Robin Doi, Wada Doi, Craig Nagasawa, Marry Wallace and Kimmie Doi
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
JAPANTOWN DESIGN STRATEGY
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION
COST SUMMARY
Table 5-4: Cost of Improvements
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Table 5-5: Maintenance Estimate - Phase One
Maintenance Estimate continues to next page
SECTION ITEM LABOR COSTS HARD COSTS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST RANGE
PAVING
Snow Removal
$16,224 $10,200 $26,424 $33,030
Cleaning
Concrete Repair
Reapply Concrete Sealer
Reapply Concrete Joint Sealant
Asphalt Repair
TREES & LANDSCAPE
Irrigation Maintenance
$6,912 $6,300 $13,212 $16,515Trees Pruning
Pest Management
Planting Replacement and Maintenance
STREET LIGHTING Street Light Repair $480 $2,000 $2,480 $3,100
ART, HISTORY, STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Art, History, Story-telling Element Repair $4,800 $4,500 $9,300 $11,625Street Light Banner Replacement
SITE FURNISHINGS Replacement of Traffic Sign Poles $1,200 $3,500 $4,700 $5,875Replacement of Site Furnishings
UTILITIES
Storm Drain Maintenance
$960 $5,000 $5,960 $7,450Utility Cost for Electrical
Utility Cost for Irrigation
PHASE ONE TOTAL COST RANGE $30,576 $31,500 $62,076 $77,595
PHASE ONE
Costs subject to change
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Table 5-6: Maintenance Estimate Continued - Phase Two
Maintenance Estimate continues to next page
SECTION ITEM LABOR COSTS HARD COSTS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST RANGE
PAVING
Snow Removal
$3,264 $10,200 $13,464 $16,830
Cleaning
Concrete Repair
Reapply Concrete Sealer
Reapply Concrete Joint Sealant
Asphalt Repair
TREES & LANDSCAPE
Irrigation Maintenance
$3,216 $1,200 $4,416 $5,520Trees Pruning
Pest Management
Planting Replacement and Maintenance
STREET LIGHTING Street Light Repair $960 $4,000 $4,960 $6,200
ART, HISTORY, STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Art, History, Story-telling Element Repair $4,800 $10,500 $15,300 $19,125Street Light Banner Replacement
SITE FURNISHINGS Replacement of Traffic Sign Poles $960 $3,000 $3,960 $4,950Replacement of Site Furnishings
UTILITIES
Storm Drain Maintenance
$0 $5,000 $5,000 $6,250Utility Cost for Electrical
Utility Cost for Irrigation
PHASE TWO TOTAL COST RANGE $13,200 $33,900 $47,100 $58,875
INCREASE FOR PHASE TWO
Costs subject to change
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
INCREASE FOR
TRENCH DRAIN ALTERNATE
# PER
YEAR
# OF
PEOPLE HOURS TOTAL
HOURS
EST. HOURLY
RATE
TOTAL LABOR
COST
TOTAL HARD
COST DESCRIPTION
1.0 Trench Drains 3 2 8 48 $120 $5,760 Removing of grate and vacuuming or flushing the system
$43,776 $62,400 TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WITHOUT TRENCH DRAINS $106,176
$49,536 $62,400 TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WITH TRENCH DRAINS $111,936
Table 5-8: Maintenance Estimate - Trench Drains
Table 5-7: Maintenance Estimate Continued - Phase Three
INCREASE FOR PHASE THREE
INCREASE FOR TRENCH DRAINS
SECTION ITEM LABOR COSTS HARD COSTS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST RANGE
PAVING
Snow Removal
$3,264 $10,200 $13,464 $16,830
Cleaning
Concrete Repair
Reapply Concrete Sealer
Reapply Concrete Joint Sealant
Asphalt Repair
TREES & LANDSCAPE
Irrigation Maintenance
$3,792 $1,200 $4,992 $6,240Trees Pruning
Pest Management
Planting Replacement and Maintenance
STREET LIGHTING Street Light Repair $960 $4,000 $4,960 $6,200
ART, HISTORY, STORY-TELLING
ELEMENTS
Art, History, Story-telling Element Repair $4,800 $14,500 $19,300 $24,125Street Light Banner Replacement
SITE FURNISHINGS Replacement of Traffic Sign Poles $960 $3,000 $3,960 $4,950Replacement of Site Furnishings
UTILITIES
Storm Drain Maintenance
$0 $5,000 $5,000 $6,250Utility Cost for Electrical
Utility Cost for Irrigation
PHASE THREE TOTAL COST RANGE $13,776 $37,900 $51,676 $64,595
SECTION ITEM LABOR COSTS HARD COSTS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST RANGE
INCREASE FOR TRENCH DRAINS Trench Drain Repair $5,760 $0 $5,760 $7,200
TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WITHOUT TRENCH DRAINS $160,852 $201,065
TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE WITH TRENCH DRAINS $166,612 $208,265
Table 5-9: Maintenance Estimate - Total
TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST
Costs subject to change
Costs subject to change
Costs subject to change
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
4 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Elements Evaluated
As part of the design process, the design team identified the approach
to decision making, management, and funding for each of the
communities reviewed.
The best practices process collected the following information for
each of the communities reviewed:
a. Type of District
b. Ownership
c. Management
The analysis identifies the governing structure and approach for each
area, identifies the lessons learned and evaluates the applicability of
the lessons to City’s Japantown Street.
Introduction
As part of the design process, the Agency requested a case study
review of management, programming, and operations structure at other
successful Japantowns so that Salt Lake City’s Japantown could model
the applicable best practices to help bring about their vision of a vibrant
and activated space.
Case Study Selection Process
The three Japantowns reviewed were selected by the Japantown
Representatives from a list of western U.S. Japantowns. They represent
Japantowns in metropolitan areas of differing size. Two of the Japantowns
– San Francisco and San Jose - represent long-term, ongoing areas of
cultural significance. The third case study location, Denver, represents
an area that, like the Salt Lake City Japantown, experienced a loss of
physical cultural resources and a more recent resurgence in interest to
recognize and revitalize the area of historical significance.
Best Practices for Management
Table 5-10: Regional Demographics
SALT LAKE REGION DENVER REGION SAN JOSE REGION SAN FRANCISCO REGION
TOTAL POPULATION 1,277,854 2,988,896 1,984,930 4,652,663
PERCENT ASIAN 3.8%3.6%34.9%23.4%
MEDIAN INCOME $76,256 $80,666 $125,772 $110,994
ORGANIZATIONAL TYPE TBD Non-Profit Development Corp.501c3 Non-Profit 501c3 Non-Profit
FUNDING SOURCE TBD Development Proceeds and Donations Local Improvement District, State &
Local Funds, Grants
Local Improvement District, State &
Local Funds, Grants
Source: U.S. Census
Best Practice Areas
The three Japantowns selected for the best practices evaluation
vary in terms of size, concentration of Japanese Americans in the
Community and history. They share a purpose to provide an area
to showcase their history within the Community, hold cultural
celebrations, and reflect their unique aesthetic qualities. Table 5-10 is
a comparison of population base and key demographic factors. The
size and demographics of the Community in which the Japantown is
located are important considerations when comparing governance
structures and funding. Although the population of Salt Lake is smaller
than the case study locations, management and organizational issues
are comparable.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
San Jose
Introduction
San Jose’s Japantown (Nihonmachi) is immediately north of San
Jose’s central business district. The City of San Jose has a population
of 1,030,119 within a broader metropolitan area of approximately 2
million. The San Jose region has a median income of $125,772, which is
significantly higher than the Salt Lake region median of $76,256. The
San Jose region is the most racially diverse of the three Best Practice
areas with 54 percent of the population identifying as non-white. The
Asian population in the San Jose region is approximately 35 percent
of the total population. The San Jose region also has the highest
percent of population of Japanese descent of all of the areas evaluated
at 1.4 percent of the total population and 4.0 percent of the Asian
population.
Japantown San Jose hosts a variety of events and festivals. San Jose’s
Japantown area is 13 blocks and provides a mix of uses including
historic residential and commercial. The area also provides retail and
social services to the surrounding community. There are over 20 food
establishments, 3 markets, 20 shops, two bars, 10 salons, 15 event and
arts locations and over 20 other services. The mixed-use environment
is supported by 6 apartment buildings in addition to an inflow of
visitors from outside Japantown.
History
San Jose’s Japantown began in the late 19th century with an influx of
Japanese agricultural workers to the Santa Clara Valley. Initial Japanese
immigrants, the Issei generation, found refuge in San Jose’s Chinatown,
but by the early 20th Century, had established a flourishing community
adjacent to Chinatown. It was during this time that many of San
Jose’s Japantown structures were constructed. The area steadily grew
through the great depression and became the primary Asian-American
cultural center for San Jose and the surrounding area.
This steady growth came to an abrupt halt in 1942 with the internment
of Japanese Americans through the remainder of World War II.
Japantown remained largely vacant during this time until 1945 when
the Japanese community was allowed to return. This area provided a
400’
HISTORY WALK
JAPANESE-AMERICAN
MUSEUM OF SAN JOSE
JACK
S
O
N
S
T
.
EMPI
R
E
S
T
.
TAYL
O
R
S
T
.
4T
H
S
T
.
1S
T
S
T
.
Figure 5-5: Map of San Jose’s Japantown (Nihonmachi)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
refuge from anti-Japanese sentiments after the war and the population
grew rapidly into the 1950’s, marking the peak of activity in Japantown.
By the 1970s Japantown saw a decline as much of the founding
Issei were aging and acculturation in mainstream American culture
disbursed Japanese descendants into the greater community.
Starting in the 1980s, community and neighborhood organizations
in and around Japantown initiated several projects to attract new
investment and activity to the area. Redevelopments include upgrade
of building facades, construction of new housing complexes, and
planning for the development of the land that was once Chinatown.
Streetscape and civic projects include the installation of historic
markers and plaques that identify and preserve Japantown’s heritage.
There are several organizations working together in the planning,
development and operation of San Jose’s Nihonmachi.
Today, the Yonsei and Gosei play a greater role in a community that
is becoming more diverse than ever. Japantown’s role in the lives of
Japanese Americans is different today than when it was founded.
Type
San Jose’s Japantown is a Naturally Occurring Cultural District (NOCD)
with historical roots dating back to the late 19th century. There are a
mix of uses within Japantown’s boundary including light industrial,
commercial and residential uses. San Jose City ordinances do not
include design guidelines specific to Japantown although some
sources of funding for historic preservation or culturally focused
projects include design criteria.
Management
There is a Business Improvement District (BID) provides coordinated
decision making and oversight of infrastructure in Japantown. There
are multiple organizations involved in the activities, management,
and preservation of San Jose’s Japantown that are represented on
the BID. They range from non-profit arts organizations to religious
organizations to the (BID) representing the needs of the businesses
in the area. The organizations cooperate and collaborate but each
organization has a unique focus and individual funding sources.
The BID funds maintenance and operations of Japantown
infrastructure. The purpose is to attract customers and visitors to
the area to support the businesses and organizations. San Jose’s
Japanese American non-profit organizations worked with the City
of San Jose to create the BID. The Japanese American Business
Association was recreated as a non-profit 501c6 organization to
manage the use, maintenance and funding of the public infrastructure
as the BID, working with the City of San Jose, identified district
boundaries. The BID is renewed annually by vote of San Jose City
Council after a review of the work and budget of the district. The
non-profit has over 150 members from local businesses, associations,
and community organizations.
Japantown Community Congress of San Jose engages community
members to advocate for the preservation of the area and promotes
ongoing efforts to enhance Community.
Fiscal
Japantown San Jose’s BID status means that commercial property
and business owners are assessed a predetermined fee when they
locate in the area. This fee goes towards management items such
as street cleaning, farmers market logistics, banner poles, website,
marketing, permits, office rent and salaries.
Membership fees associated with BID status vary according to entity
size. Corporate membership fees are $150 annually, non-profits are
$60 annually, associates are $75 annually, and individuals and farmers
market vendors are $25 annually. These fees have remained constant
since 1987 when the BID was formed.
In addition to funding through the BID, Japantowns in California
receive funding for the development of plans for the cultural
preservation of remaining Japantowns within the state.
Top: Annual Shukai, or car show held in San Jose’s Japantown.
Bottom: San Jose’s Naturally Occurring Cultural District is home to dozens of local businesses.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
San Francisco
Introduction
The San Francisco region’s 2018 estimated population was
approximately 4.7 million. San Francisco has a median income of
$110,994 which is significantly higher than the Salt Lake region median
of $76,256. The San Francisco area is racially diverse with 45 percent
of the population identifying as non-white. The Asian population
in the San Francisco region is approximately 23 percent of the total
population. People of Japanese descent are 4.3 percent of the Asian
population.
San Francisco’s Japantown comprises six blocks in the Western
Addition neighborhood of the city. San Francisco’s Japantown hosts
over 58 food and drink establishments, 39 shops, 32 salons and 7 event
and arts locations. The mixed-use environment is supported by a dense
multi-use urban setting with both commercial and residential space.
History
Early Japanese immigrants to the San Francisco area arrived in 1867.
Initial immigrants, or Issei, worked on silk and tea farms and the
Japanese population grew steadily until the mid-1880s when Japan
liberalized emigration restrictions and the Japanese population in the
U.S. grew rapidly. The 1906 earthquake and fires destroyed much of the
early Japanese settlements in the city and prompted the community to
relocate to the present Japantown area in the Western Addition. This
marked the establishment of today’s Japantown.
San Francisco’s Japantown prospered through the 1920’s and 30’s
eventually becoming home to over 5,000 residents and 200 Japanese
owned businesses by 1940. The area drew a culturally diverse audience
and was a part of the web of modern American commerce. Restrictions
400’
GEARY BLVD.
WE
B
S
T
E
R
S
T
.
LA
G
U
N
A
S
T
.
POST ST.
PEACE PLAZA
SUTTER ST.
HISTORY WALK
Figure 5-6: Map of San Francisco’s Japantown
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
on property ownership meant that most businesses located in buildings
designed for other uses. However, a handful of purpose-built structures
provide an example of Japanese American development.
Japantown was impacted in 1941 and 1942 with the internment of
the Japanese community until their release in 1945. The period after
WWII saw a period of urban renewal effort led by the city’s political
and business elite. The San Francisco Redevelopment agency began
acquiring properties through eminent domain. Urban decentralization
during this period caused displacement within the community and led
Japanese American families to relocate elsewhere.
The 1960’s continued to see redevelopment as funds from the federal
highway program funded the Geary Expressway through what had
formerly been the Japantown-Fillmore neighborhood. This era also
saw the development of St. Francis square and the Japanese Cultural
and Trade Center. By 1976 Buchanan Mall was built and a village
highlighting Japanese design characteristics. The area also provided
services to the community. Japantown continued to see redevelopment
efforts to increase housing availability and to preserve ethnic
characteristics into the 1980’s.
Type
The San Francisco Japantown is a Naturally Occurring Cultural District
(NOCD) with historical roots dating back to the late 19th century.
Multiple land uses are included in the San Francisco Japantown area
including residential, retail, office and services. In addition, the City
of San Francisco has imposed design guidelines and other land use
restrictions to protect the character of Japantown by requiring new
land uses to be compatible with the cultural and historic integrity,
neighborhood character, development pattern and design aesthetic.
The regulations are imposed through the Japantown Special Use
District (SUD).
Management
San Francisco Japantown formed a Community Benefit District
(JTCBD) in 2017 to improve and convey special benefits to properties
within Japantown. The JTCBD was formed to meet the goals of the
district. The JTCBD has developed a Management Plan to respond to
today’s market opportunities and district challenges.
The District is responsible for the provision of new improvements and
activities, including both environmental and economic enhancements.
These enhancements include:
+ Street and sidewalk cleaning
+ Safety Ambassadors who provide information about activities and
work with local police to prevent crime and improve quality of life
+ Beautification
+ Business Liaison services to connect the business community with
available resources
+ Economic and business development to support the growth and
vitality of existing business investments
+ Marketing
+ Employment of a full-time professional district coordinator to
manage all initiatives, maintain ongoing communications between
JTCBD and district property owners. Funds are also budgeted for
administrative support for the district and a budget reserve.
Fiscal
The San Francisco Japantown maintains a $400,000 budget.
Economic Enhancement and Environmental Enhancements
represent the highest spending categories ($195,000 and $125,000
respectfully) with Administrative and CBD Reserve costs ($70,000
and $10,000) constituting the remainder of the annual budget.
Of the total revenue, $393,750 is generated by Assessment Revenues
and $6,250 from other sources. This revenue is largely dependent
upon a real property levy. Annual assessments are based upon an
allocation of program costs and building square footage, as well as
land use and linear street frontage.
Top: San Francisco Japantown’s center square with the Peace Pagoda in the Background.
Bottom: The five story Peace Pagoda in the center of San Francisco’s Japantown was gifted
by sister city Osaka in 1960.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Denver
Introduction
The Denver region’s 2018 estimated population was approximately 3
million. The Denver region has a median income $80,666 slightly higher
than the Salt Lake region median of $76,256. In Denver approximately
19 percent of the population identifies as non-white, this is roughly
comparable to the Salt Lake region. The Asian population in the Denver
region is estimated at 3.6 percent of the total population. People of
Japanese descent are 0.3 percent of the total population and 8.3
percent of the Asian population.
Denver’s Japantown, Sakura Square, is one block immediately north
of Denver’s central business district. Sakura Square is a central plaza
with surrounding businesses. Businesses within the block include two
restaurants, four businesses/services, and a market. The square also
has a 20-story apartment tower.
History
Denver’s first Japanese immigrants, Issei, migrated to Colorado in the
late 19th century following the expansion of the railroad and demand
for laborers in farms, mines and domestics. By 1910, the Japanese
population in the state reached nearly 2,300.
Following Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were permitted to
“voluntarily” relocate to Colorado. Prewar Governor Ralph Carr
welcomed Japanese Americans and Denver’s Japanese population
grew to approximately 5,000 with 258 Japanese American businesses
in 1945. However, in 1942 Carr was defeated by opponent Edwin
Johnson who took an avid anti-Japanese stance. Despite Colorado’s
reputation of being tolerant of war-spurred Japanese American
400’
19T
H
S
T
.
PARKING GARAGE
BUDDHIST TEMPLE
PLAZA
LAR
I
M
E
R
S
T
.
RESIDENTIAL TOWER/
FIRST FLOOR RETAIL
ARA
P
A
H
O
E
S
T
.
RETAIL/
PACIFIC MERCANTILE
21S
T
S
T
Figure 5-7: Map of Denver’s Japantown (Sakura Square)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
immigration, Colorado saw the imprisonment of nearly 7,500 persons
at Granada Relocation Center in the southeastern part of the state.
The Japanese American population in the state peaked in 1945 at
11,700, but rapidly fell to 5,412 following the release of internees, as
restrictions lifted in the western states. A vibrant community remained
in the heart of Denver stretching over 9-square blocks. In the early
1970s Denver Urban Renewal Authority began a redevelopment
process of the Downtown area and threatened to divide the
community. However, the community was given the option to move
into a one-block Sakura Square area housing the existing Tri-State
Denver Buddhist Temple. Sakura Square was officially established
in 1973. Although the community shrank as families moved back to
the West Coast, third, fourth and even fifth-generation Japanese
Americans have grown up in the Denver area, and today keep alive
cultural traditions and celebrate their identity in an annual Cherry
Blossom Festival.
More than forty years after its creation, the block is undergoing a
resurgence of cultural significance while reinvigorating its residential
and commercial assets. Since its dedication in May 1973, Sakura
Square has been a multi-generational, multi-cultural community and
a destination for those seeking Japanese goods and services. Sakura
Square is an example of a truly successful multi-use project in the
heart of downtown Denver.
Type
Denver’s Japantown is an historic regeneration type of cultural
area. Sakura Square has its roots in the historic Japantown but,
because of redevelopment pressures from the broader community,
has now concentrated in a one block area.
Management
As a redevelopment entity, Sakura Square is governed by a
Limited Liability Corporation or LLC. There is a nine-member
Board of Managers as well as a five-member staff including a
Chief Executive Officer, Director of Business Operations, Program
Director, Operations Coordinator and Groundskeeper/Maintenance
individual. Sakura Square, LLC oversees the leasing, maintenance
and activities of the residential high rise, retail shops, parking
garage and public plaza located on Sakura Square.
Sakura Square LLC recently initiated an investigation into
redevelopment options to reposition Sakura Square for current and
future generations of the community and the Temple members.
The future of the existing structures on the block has not yet been
determined. Should Sakura Square LLC and Tri-State/Denver
Buddhist Temple decide to move forward with re-development, the
goal will be to create a mix of private uses which may include retail,
commercial and parking venues, plus community uses which will
highlight the Japanese American heritage and culture. The Temple
will remain on the block for the continued use of its members.
The intent of the possible redevelopment is to create an area
that is sustainable and reflects Japanese-influenced design and
architecture.
Fiscal
Funding for operations, maintenance, activities and events on
Sakura Square are a result of lease payments, parking fees and
other real estate related funds.
Top: Tamai Tower at Sakura Square offers housing and helps fund programming on the block.
Bottom: The view from the Japanese garden at Sakura Square.
The Buddhist Temple in Sakura was originally built in 1947 and acts as an anchor to
Sakura Square.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Sakura Square in Denver is owned and operated by a single entity
giving that entity complete control over the development of buildings
on the site, within Denver’s general zoning provisions.
Recommendations
Management & Budget
In all three of the areas evaluated there is a single organization that
acts as the official and formal decision-making body relating to
funding, use and maintenance of infrastructure. Other organizations
participate in the business association or similar group to ensure roles
and responsibilities are clearly defined and competition for limited
funding sources minimized.
In the City, there are several organizations with an interest in
Japantown, including the JCC, SLBT, JCPC and other organizations. As
the Community pursues implementation of the design and continues
to attract visitors and interest to the street through programming it
is recommended that the Japantown Community create a Japantown
Management Group with the following responsibilities:
A new non-profit organization governed by a Japantown Management
Group should be formed with the following responsibilities:
+ Formal decision making process for Japantown
+ Identification and management of funding sources for infrastructure
projects and ongoing operations and maintenance
+ Budgeting and fiscal control
+ Coordination and scheduling of events on Japantown Street
+ Hosting a website that provides comprehensive information
concerning the area
+ Hiring of professional staff to oversee the organization, as funding
becomes available.
Key Lessons Learned
Management & Budget
Each of the best practice areas include an organization such as
a Business Association or similar committee to provide a reliable
decision making process and unified business plan. Individual agencies
or groups that provide programming or own property in the area
serve on the decision-making association or committee. Maintenance
and operations of infrastructure in the two California areas is funded
through a BID or similar levy on property benefiting from the
infrastructure investment. Funding for initial capital improvements in
the two California Japantowns was primarily through state grants.
Sakura Square in Denver has a somewhat different management
structure through the redevelopment corporation that owns and
operates the facilities on the block. Funding for improvements,
maintenance and operations is primarily generated from lease
payments and parking fees. Infrastructure improvements were made
as part of the initial investment on the block.
Planning and Design
In all Japantowns reviewed there is some form of design guidance
for new development and redevelopment in the area based on the
history of the area. New construction in the San Francisco Japantown
is required to meet the provisions of a design overlay zone intended
to preserve architecturally significant structures, building scale and
massing of structures and enhance resident and visitor experience in
the area. There are two sections in the San Francisco zoning code that
define Japantown’s boundaries and identify and govern development
activity in the area.
Planning and zoning for the San Jose Japantown is part of the City’s
overall approach. The area is defined in the City’s general plan and
zoning map.
Future of Salt Lake City’s Japantown
Funding Improvements
There are two categories of funding needed to implement the
Japantown vision:
+ Capital investment for infrastructure
+ Operating funds for maintenance and operations
The following potential funding sources, among others, should be
evaluated and pursued as appropriate:
+ City funding allocations
+ County grants and funding allocations
+ Federal grants
+ Special Improvement District or Business Improvement District
levies on area property owners
+ Private donations
Nihon Matsuri on Japantown Street in Salt Lake City.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
5 . I M P L E M E N T A T I O N A N D O P E R A T I O N S
Next Steps
Create a governance structure to oversee implementation and
management of the design concept and create a reliable, consistent
decision-making process for Japantown.
+ Establish a management group to oversee following steps
+ Identify co-leaders for:
- Fund Raising
- Historic content development
- Artistic content development
Using the design concept, guidelines, and phasing strategy identified
as part of this process:
+ Prioritize design elements for short-, medium- and long-term
implementation
+ Identify needed funding and potential funding sources
+ Develop a strategic approach to pursuing funding and management
of funding
In addition to the infrastructure improvements and design elements
identified in the design guidelines, the Management Group should
work with community partners to:
+ Identify Japantown on visitor and other similar maps.
+ Create City planning and zoning tools to aid in implementation,
as appropriate
+ Work closely with State, City, County, Salt Palace, and Convention
and Visitors Bureau and other partners to achieve community goals
Annual Obon festival in Salt Lake City.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
第一章
Section One
Executive Summary and Preferred Design ConceptAppendices
Section Six
第六章
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
5 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Existing Conditions Report
Overview
Salt Lake City's Japantown is an historical area that was once much
larger than it is today. As of 2020, the Japantown area includes the
stretch of 100 South Street from 200 West to 300 West streets in
downtown.
As part of the design strategy and guidelines project the consultant
team completed an evaluation of the current built environment in
order to identify opportunities and constraints to implementation of
the design vision. Critical to the evaluation was information gathered
through a series of meetings the consultant team held with City
departments and neighboring stakeholders to understand codes,
policies, technical requirements and functional considerations. The
information learned through the existing conditions evaluation process
will be used to inform the final design and implementation steps.
Regional Context
Salt Lake City has a population of 200,519 in the 2018 U.S. Census
Bureau estimate. It falls within a large population along the Wasatch
Front that includes Salt Lake, Davis, Weber and Utah Counties. The
total population along the Wasatch Front is 2,412,366 (U.S. Census
2019) and is expected to increase by 60% by 2040 (WFRC). The
extent of Salt Lake City can be seen in Figure 6-1.
JAPANTOWN
AIRPORT
STATE CAPITOL
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SALT LAKE CITY
I-80
I-15
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
DOWNTOWN
10 MI 2 MI
Figure 6-1: Regional Context Map
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Local Context
Japantown currently stretches from 200 West to
300 West along 100 South. The Japanese Church of
Christ sits on the north block, Block 78, and the Salt
Lake Buddhist Temple sits on the southern block,
Block 67. The Street also hosts various festivals
and gatherings throughout the year including the
Nihon Matsuri, the Obon Festival, the Aki Matsuri,
and an assortment of private and community-
based events. This area is zoned as D-4 Secondary
Central Business District, an area classified to foster
an environment consistent with the area’s function
as a housing, entertainment, cultural, convention,
business and retail section of the city that supports
the Central Business District. Per the 2010 Census,
the total population of Block 67 is approximately
240 people with an estimated 220 housing units.
Most of these residents are within the Multi-Ethnic
Housing and Jackson Apartments.
現在
100 So uth - 2019
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST T EMPLE
SOUTH T EMPLE
10 0 SOUTH
20 0 SOUTH
3 00 S OUTH
3
0
0
W
E
S
T
2
0
0
W
E
S
T
M
A
I
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
W
E
S
T
T
E
M
P
L
E
UNI ON PACI FIC
D EPOT
T HE GATEWAY
VIV INT ARENA
SALT PALACE
THE WEST QUARTER
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
現在
100 Sou th - 2 0 20
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
20
0
W
.
I-
1
5
UNIVERSITY
OF UTAH
SOUTH TEMPLE
Figure 6-2: Regional Context Map
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Past & Future Planning Efforts
Existing Plans
Japantown is subject to existing City plans which guide future
development of the area.
The Downtown Master Plan provides a vision for future growth and
development within the City. Japantown is part of the Salt Palace District,
identified in the Downtown Master Plan as a major economic driver for
the city. Initiatives for this area emphasize the development that:
+ Is vibrant and active through:
- Improvement of signage and wayfinding
- Inviting street activity
- Long-term viability of the convention space
+ Is welcoming and safe by:
- Maximizing visual transparency
- Providing a well lit pedestrian network that enhances safety and
quality of experience
+ Unites city and nature by developing water management programs to
capture and reuse storm water and groundwater for landscape irrigation
The Salt Lake City Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan envisions that
“Walking and bicycling in Salt Lake City will be safe, convenient,
comfortable, and viable transportation options that connect
people to places, foster recreational and economic development
opportunities, improve personal health and the environment, and
elevate quality of life.” This vision illustrates the community and Salt
Lake City’s desire for complete streets and multi-use paths.
The section of 200 West between 200 South and South Temple is
designated as a Multi-Use Path/ Bikeway, although established bike
lanes do not yet exist.
The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan recommends the
implementation of a buffered bike lane along 100 South between
200 West and 600 West.
300 West is recommended to include a separated bikeway as a long
term recommendation within 10-15 years.
200 West is recommended to receive a buffered lane within the 20
year Vision Map.
1965, Salt Lake City’s Japantown on 100 S between West Temple and 100 West.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Future Plans and Development
Japantown is in an area of downtown that is undergoing significant
new private investment and redevelopment. The West Quarter
Development , by the Ritchie Group, is under construction along the
southwestern frontage of the street and extends through the block to
200 South. Since its construction, the County has owned and operated
the Salt Palace Convention Center that is now part of Japantown’s
frontage. Japantown Street is used for access to loading docks for
both the main exhibit hall to the east and for the secondary exhibit
halls that are located on the street.
THE WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT - ON BLOCK 67
The West Quarter Development will have a significant impact on
Japantown Street both in terms of the built environment and in
terms of activity and traffic on the street.
The first phase of the development, which includes the Japantown
frontage, consists of:
+ Apartment tower
+ Plaza and private street
+ Hotel
+ Parking garage
+ Retail
The parking garage and service entrances are on Japantown Street.
Active uses at street level of the apartment building, that will become
part of Japantown Street, are limited to the corner of Japantown Street
and 300 West. The opportunity exists for a potential connection to the
midblock via a walkway between the West Quarter Development and
the SLBT parking lot.
An increase in activity is expected on the street, along with an
increase in traffic at levels that can be accommodated in a two-
lane with center turn-lane road configuration.
The West Quarter approved development, on Block 67
CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL
(200 S. West Temple)
A new convention center hotel is under construction on the Salt Palace
Convention Center property at West Temple and 200 South. The new
hotel is located on what used to be a plaza, used as an outdoor venue
by the Convention Center operator. Although the new hotel does not
directly impact Japantown Street, the loss of an outdoor venue for the
Convention Center may be an opportunity for the street.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Area & Site Evaluation
Pedestrian Environment
Japantown is in the city’s Central Business District. As seen in Figure
6-3, Japantown is near a variety of different pedestrian draws
including over 52 restaurants within a ten-minute walking distance,
the Salt Palace, Vivint Smart Home Arena, The Gateway and various
event destinations. This area is also surrounded by multiple high-rise
housing options which are served by multiple bus and TRAX lines.
The pedestrian environment on Japantown Street faces several
challenges. The Salt Palace inhibits movement on Japantown Street
Figure 6-3: Pedestrian Amenities Map
Table 6-1 : Existing Elements on the Japantown Street
SECTION CRITERIA EXISTING
FESTIVALS
Obon Dancing Circle 45 ft
Nihon Matsuri Booth #39
Nihon Matsuri Vendor Lane Location - 14’North
Festival Fire Lane Location - 20’Street
PEDESTRIAN WAY
Width - North Side 8 ft
Width - South Side 8 ft
Length - North Side 730 ft
Length - South Side 712 ft
PARKING STALLS
Total On Street Parking 48
Accessible Parking Stalls 0
ROADWAY
Total Lanes of Travel 4
Width - Lane of Travel 12 ft
Turning Lane 0
Width - Turning Lane N/A
Street Width - minus parking 60 ft
STREET TREES Trees in Public Right of Way 13
RIGHT OF WAY Width 124 ft
and forces pedestrians to navigate an extra quarter of a mile to 200
South to reach Japantown. The large blocks of this area in the city
also presents obstacles to pedestrians. Large setbacks, fencing and
parking lots on the south side of the block makes mid-block crossing
difficult if not impossible.
In addition, there are safety concerns related to loading and
unloading for the Salt Palace along the street. Japantown Street
feels wide, when crossing on foot, and lacks a mid-block crossing to
connect the north and south sides of the street.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Site Conditions
Figure 6-4 is a map of the existing utilities and site conditions
on Japantown Street. All utilities serving buildings in the area are
located in the street including water, sewer, and storm drain.
In addition, there are significant communications lines located
beneath the northern-most lanes of the road. The communications
facilities include a vault and junctions that are critical to operations
of the Salt Palace.
The presence of the communications infrastructure beneath Japan-
town Street poses a challenge for lowering the crown in the road.
Figure 6-4: Utilities and Site Conditions on Japantown Street
Technical Representative Meetings
The design team met with representatives from the applicable City
departments to gather preliminary information regarding existing
conditions and comments for the Japantown area. Key information
from each meeting is summarized below.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
+ An existing conditions report in the Downtown Master Plan mentions
the different cultural influences on the area. The Downtown Plan
encourages projects to tell the story of each place with reference to
culture and history.
+ There is a precedent for street narrowing, downtown, along 300
South Street between 300 East and the Rio Grande Depot. A similar
concept could be considered for Japantown Street.
PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
+ The City is pushing toward sustainable street design including
providing water management in the street through permeable
surfaces, bioswales, and similar water retention strategies.
+ Japantown Street has water main lines running on both the north and
south side of the street.
+ Water is being drained from north loading dock of the Salt Palace to
just in front of the Japanese Garden, on the east side of the Japanese
Church of Christ.
+ There is existing street lighting on the north side of Japantown Street
Street. The city has considered replacing with standard acorn style
fixtures. There is one street pole and five pedestrian poles, three
of which were installed as part of a previous effort to acknowledge
Japantown. The detail of these three pole tops reflect a Japanese
aesthetic. The fixture arms are oriented over the curb, however,
rather than the sidewalk, making them less effective as pedestrian
fixtures. The other two pedestrian poles are standard acorn style
fixtures. There are no pedestrian poles on the south side of the street
and only one street light head, mounted to a wooden power pole.
According to Public Utilities, fixtures that are not the city’s standard
fixtures have to be coordinated with the city’s street lighting division
and maintenance (including lamp replacement) is the responsibility
of the special improvement district.
+ The West Quarter Development will bury power on 300 West and
along their property on Japantown Street. The remaining overhead
power lines on Japantown Street will remain and should be buried
as part of the Japantown Street redesign. There is an opportunity to
work with the West Quarter development to select new fixtures that
are consistent with the Japantown Design Strategy and Guidelines.
+ The wood power pole on the north side of Japantown Street is
decommissioned.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
+ City’s pedestrian/bike master plan shows protected bike lanes on
Japantown Street. The additional parking between 400 and 500
West prevented a dedicated bike lane near the Gateway.
+ A shared street might be a good option for Japantown Street.
(Shared streets remove the formal distinctions between spaces
dedicated to pedestrians, cyclists, and motorized vehicles. The
street is shared by everyone, with each user becoming increasingly
aware and respectful of the others.) City is interested in creating
true shared streets.
+ Consider instead of angled parking, narrowing the street and
creating more sidewalk and green space.
+ Only one lane is needed in each direction. There is a precedent
for this on Japantown Street between 400 West and 500 West.
Narrowing the street to one lane will require modification to the
signals at the intersection of 300 West to make the eastbound
right-hand lane on Japantown Street, a right turn only. 300 West is
a UDOT road and changes will have to be coordinated with them.
+ City prioritizes pedestrian movement and green space over
vehicular movement in this area.
+ The idea of a wide mid-block crossing on Japantown Street was
discussed. Transporation is not opposed to the idea but because it
is unconventional within SLC, will require more detailed discussion.
SUSTAINABILITY DEPARTMENT
+ The design team met with representatives of City’s Office of
Sustainability to review programs that may be available to building
owners on the street.
+ City is working towards the implementation of bioswales and
solar lighting throughout the city, which may be a possibility for
infrastructure improvements on Japantown Street.
ARTS COUNCIL
+ The design team met with representatives of the Salt Lake City Arts
Council to discuss opportunities for public art on Japantown Street.
The Arts Council observed that some of the best opportunities will
come from incorporating art into as many of the street elements as
possible. Examples included artist designed bollards and signage.
The Arts Council stated they are available as a resource to the
project moves forward.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
+ City allows pavers in public sidewalks
+ Multiple examples of downtown frontage with a combination of brick
pavers and concrete paving.
- The Salt Lake City Downtown Master Plan discusses the use
of paving patterns to help establish and characterize different
districts.
- Engineering Department will consider proposals to remove curbs
and use materials other than asphalt and concrete in the street.
+ Engineering’s primary concern is for safety and ADA compliance
+ Where curbs are not used, boundaries between pedestrian and
vehicular zones must be continuously delineated with tactile
materials that alert pedestrians, both sighted and sight-impaired as
implemented on Regent Street.
+ Wide mid-block crossings are unconventional in City and will require
additional discussion and coordination with City departments.
+ There could potentially be fiber, electrical, telephone lines running
under Japantown Street
- There are 32 manholes along that section of Japantown Street
(See Figure 6-4)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
+ A 20-foot wide fire access lane must be maintained along the entire
length of the street during festivals. Nothing may be placed in this
access lane, not even chairs. The minimum overhead clear height of
the fire access lane is 13’-6”.
+ The West Quarter development will have fire access from 300 West.
Fire access will not be required from Japantown Street.
+ City is currently discussing adopting alternate means and methods
that would allow more flexibility to Appendix D105.3 of the
International Fire Code (IFC) regarding the 15-foot to 30-foot
proximity requirement for aerial fire apparatus to buildings over 30
feet in height.
+ The fire code requires a 10-foot separation between festival booths
with cooking equipment. If the cooking equipment uses propane,
the propane tank must be separated from the cooking equipment by
10 feet.
Vendors selling Japanese snacks during the Aki Matsuri
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
The Japanese Church of Christ
and the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple
The SLBT and JCC still function as the gathering places of the
Japanese American Community and are the enduring vestiges of City’s
Japantown. They anchor the east and west ends of the street and
generate activity on Sundays, special gatherings and activities during
the week, seasonal events, and the traditional street festivals attended
by community members from across the Wasatch Front and the public
at large, sharing their culture with the greater community.
Church-goers often utilize street parking in addition to the surface
parking lots adjacent to their buildings and on the south side of
Japantown Street. The SLBT and JCC have a memorandum of
understanding with the County to allow free parking in the Salt Palace
parking structure for events and festivals. Temporary event parking is
also set-up in the middle of the street for activities as described below.
Funerals are often held at each of the two churches requiring clear
space along the curbs in front of their entry doors for hearse parking
and casket processions.
Cultural Festivals
Japantown Street is the venue for several annual festivals, hosted by
the SLBT, the JCC and independently. These festivals are the lifeblood
of Community and a primary way they welcome and share Japanese
and Japanese American culture with the public. Three of the larger
and more well-know festivals are the Obon Festival, the Nihon Matsuri,
and the Aki Matsuri. The street is closed to through traffic during
festival times.
The Japanese Church of Christ was built in 1924 and is on the National Register of Historic Places. It is significant as
one of the few remaining sites to have been continuously associated with ethnic minorities in Utah.
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive J. Willard Marriott
Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
OBON FESTIVAL
The Obon Festival is held each year on a Saturday during the month
of July. It is a Buddhist tradition that commemorates and remembers
deceased ancestors. Chochin (paper) lanterns are hung and Obon
dances (bon odori) are performed. The festival begins early in the day
and continues late into the evening. It features a variety of Japanese
American food and gifts, music, taiko drum performances, and
traditional Japanese dances that are performed in a very large circle
on the east half of the Street. The circle represents oneness and is
symbolically important however, in reality the circle has become an
oval to accommodate the large number of dancers within the width of
the street. There are three rows of dancers around the oval. Chairs are
set up around it for spectators. On the north side, the chairs are set
well within the curb line to allow a 20-foot clear fire truck access lane
during the festival.
Food is served primarily inside the SLBT gymnasium though there are a
few food and drink booths outside. One is in front of the temple at the
east end of the street, within the SLBT property. The other is in front of
Lumbini’s Garden adjacent to the sidewalk. A beer garden with seating is
held on the patio that is south of the temple and enclosed from the streets.
Festival parking is provided in three areas. Volunteers park in the SLBT
lot on the south side of Japantown Street, just east of the West Quarter
development. Festival-goers park either in temporary street stalls, angled
in two rows at the center of the west half of the Japantown street, or in the
Salt Palace parking structure immediately to the North, or on surrounding
streets. The SLBT and JCC have a memorandum of understanding with the
County for free parking in the parking structure during festivals and events.
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
THE WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
Figure 6-5: Obon Festival diagram on existing Japantown Street
Annual Obon festival in Salt Lake City.
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 8
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
NIHON MATSURI
Nihon Matsuri, meaning “Japan Festival”, is held each year on a
Saturday during the month of April. It is organized by the Utah Nihon
Matsuri Committee and supported by the JCC. Its mission is “To share
and educate the larger Utah community about Japanese and Japanese
American culture, history, and traditions as well as to be a way to pass
on the Japanese traditions and culture to younger fifth, sixth, and
seventh generation Japanese Americans and to help them identify with
their heritage.” For more information about the Nihon Matsuri, visit
https://www.nihonmatsuri.com/.
The festival is set up along the entire length of Japantown Street with
stages and audience seating at the east and west ends, and booths
lining the north and south sides of the street. The booths are arranged
to allow for fire truck access on one side and a vendor lane on the other.
Food booths are located on the north side of the street for proximity to
the JCC facilities. The fire code requires a 10-foot separation between
booths with cooking equipment. If the cooking equipment uses propane,
the propane tank must be separated from the cooking equipment by 10
feet. These constraints inform the festival layout.
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
THE WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
Figure 6-6: Nihon Matsuri diagram on existing Japantown Street
AKI MATSURI & OTHER FESTIVALS
The churches have hosted a number of other festivals and events over
the years, such as the JCC's Fall festival - the Aki Matsuri, and have
indicated a strong interest to continue and to use the street as the
venue. They are expected to be no larger in footprint than the Obon
Festival and Nihon Matsuri so the same spatial criteria and physical
constraints can be assumed adequate for them as well.
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
6 9
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
The Salt Palace Convention Center
The County-owned Salt Palace Convention Center terminates the east
end of Japantown Street along 200 West. A 2006 addition bridges
200 West and occupies much of the block between Japantown Street
and South Temple. Over half of the frontage along the north side
of the street is occupied by its loading dock and parking structure
entrance and exit. There is a screening wall at the back of the sidewalk
on Japantown Street and the loading dock and dumpsters. Large
trucks access the loading dock through gated entries from Japantown
Street. They also queue in the street for periods of time in preparation
for conventions and events. In the past there have been instances
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
THE WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
Figure 6-7: Salt Palace truck turning radius
of packing and other materials stored on the street, outside of the
screening wall for extended periods of time. Salt Palace management
and representatives of the SLBT and JCC have work closely to
minimize the queuing and storage impacts on the street.
The Salt Palace’s main functional concerns relating to the redesign of
Japantown Street are:
+ Maintaining adequate queuing space for trucks on the street,
+ Ensuring adequate turning access into the loading dock, and
+ Continued coordination of festival schedules with loading and
unloading requirements at the facility.
Any narrowing of the public right-of-way should include angled curb
cuts at the entrances from the street into the loading dock area to
accommodate truck turning radii. All streetscape elements placed
in the right-of-way must similarly respect requirements for truck
maneuvering and access. See Figure 6-7.
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 0
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
THE JAPANESE COMMUNITY GARDEN
During the 2006 expansion, County dedicated the open space
between the Salt Palace parking structure entrance and the JCC as a
Japanese community garden. This was done in acknowledgment of its
encroachment on the Japanese neighborhood and in living homage to
the Issei and Nisei, the Japanese people who first immigrated, and their
U.S.-born children.
The design of the garden is described by Gaylis Linville, former
Director of Communications and Public Relations for the Salt Palace
Convention Center as follows:
“Amid the concrete, bricks, asphalt and hard, angular edges of the
west side of the Convention District, there lies an urban oasis that is
totally unexpected. A small garden that uses light, space, wind, water,
and even part of the adjoining building to create a haven in the middle
of hectic. The Japanese Community Garden is tucked away between
the Salt Palace Convention Center and the Japanese Church of Christ,
offering visitors a compact view into the tradition, symbolism and art of
the Japanese garden.
This Japanese garden is designed using the “shakkei 借景” method,
meaning “borrowed landscape.” It draws the large, outer landscape –
tall trees further down the street, for example – into the composition of
the small garden. What it lacks in size it makes up for in content; a rich
layering of textures, colors and shapes.”
The garden is maintained by SMG, the company that manages the Salt
Palace. SMG consulted on maintenance with long-time community
member and architect Gordon Hashimoto, who had expertise in the art
of Japanese gardening techniques and a distinguished background in
design. Mr. Hashimoto passed away in 2018 and his cultivation of the
garden is sorely missed.
Garden plants and trees include - Periwinkle, Jasmine, Japanese Iris,
Wisteria, Chinese Yellow Bamboo, Cherry Trees, Pine, Japanese Lace-
leaf Maple, Linden, and Boston Ivy as a backdrop.
Photos and more detail about the garden can be found at https://www.
japanesegardening.org/site/salt-palace/.
Photo of the Japanese Community Garden Photos of Kimono Gates at the Salt Palace Convention Center
Photo of Japantown Sign and Plaques
KIMONO GATES
The Salt Palace loading dock is enclosed with walls and gates that were
embellished with materials and artwork that reference the history of
the street. The following words are engraved on the dedication plaque,
by artist Cliff Garten in 2006:
The Japanese Church of Christ and the Salt Lake Buddhist Temple are
cornerstones of the Japanese community of Salt Lake City, which once
thrived for many blocks in this area. These gates are homage to the
history of the Japanese community in Salt Lake City and Utah. They
are composed of the fragments of 18th century Japanese Kimonos
and their textile patterns that the artist used to form a new pattern
in bronze for these gates. The assimilation of Japanese culture within
America is only equal to the capacity of Japanese culture to endure in
order preserve the essence of being a Japanese American. The artist
and the community offer these gates in honor of Japanese ancestors
who walked this district, raised families, became civic leaders and
contributed to American culture. The gates are a sign of the cultural
connections between America and Japan that will endure as a part of
our community.
Artist Cliff Garten 2006.
Fabrication by Metal Arts Foundry, Lehi, Utah.
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 1
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
The West Quarter Development
The West Quarter Development wraps the southwest corner of
Japantown Street and forms part of the streetscape. Two sets of
in-and-out driveways, one for service vehicles and the other for
automobile access to the parking structure, occur on the street at
the east end of the development. Pedestrian access connecting
Japantown Street to the West Quarter Development is located along
the eastern boundary of the West Quarter property adjacent to the
SLBT parking lot.
The sidewalk, curb and gutter, and street trees along this section of
Japantown Street should be revised to match the rest of the street
design. This includes the paving materials and pattern, the tree
species and grates. The tree locations, relative to the street edge,
should also be revised to align with those along the rest of the street
and to allow the necessary clearance for vendor vehicles during the
Nihon Matsuri.
Rendering of the West Quarter development. View from Northwest.
Japantown street to the left of image. - Nexas Architects
Figure 6-8: Project boundary of the West Quarter development.
Figure 6-9: Location of the West Quarter development shown in red dotted line adjacent to the Japantown Street.
375 WEST 200 SOUTH
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
P 801.521.8600
F 801.521.7913
PROJECT NAME: JAPANTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES
GSBS PROJECT NUMBER: 2019.088.00
DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 2020
JAPANTOWN | 日本人まち | INITIAL STREET LAYOUT CONCEPTS
LUMBINI’S GARDEN
SALT PALACE LOADING DOCK
THE WEST QUARTER DEVELOPMENT
20
0
W
E
S
T
30
0
W
E
S
T
JAPANESE CHURCH
OF CHRIST
JAPANESE
GARDEN
SALT LAKE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
JAPANESE
GARDEN
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
JAPANESE
CHURCH OF
CHRIST
PARKING
MULTI-ETHNIC
HOUSING
PARKING
STRUVE
BUILDING
SALT PALACE
SALT LAKE
BUDDHIST
TEMPLE
PARKING
THE WEST
QUARTER
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 2
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S R E P O R T
Existing Light Fixtures on Japantown Street
North side of Japantown Street, 5 typical
pedestrian poles (Acorn head)
North side of Japantown Street, 3 specialty
pedestrian pole (“lantern” style)
South side of Japantown Street,
typical street pole (Cobra head)
100 South Street, typical street &
pedestrian pole (Cactus style)
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 3
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - P H O T O A R C H I V E
Photo Archive
Aloha Fountain and Saikayen Confectioner
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
Craig Nagasawa and Robin Doi
Beverly Seki watching Shigeru Goto promenading in Town
Don Seki from Hawaii in Salt Lake City
Aloha Fountain Snack Bar Sign
Demolition of Japantown making room for the new
convention center
Bushnell boys at the O K Cafe in Salt Lake City where the group
would meet and play Hawaiian music for the customers Willie
Oshiro two unidentified women Toshio Kokubun Jerry Miyashiro
unidentified woman Kiyoshi Yoshii and Willie Higa
First South Salt Lake City’s Japan Town before it was de-
molished for the Salt Palace In 1923 it was also home to the
Japanese Church of Christ
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 4
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - P H O T O A R C H I V E
Photo Archive
Fred Toyota in front of the OK Cafe in Salt Lake City's Japan
Town
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
Jackson Muramoto standing on a sidewalk between State
and Main Street on First South The KDYL Radio Station
can be seen in the background across from which was the
Western Hotel 1947
Hideo Ochi and Mary Murakami standing next to a car
Kiyoji Kanegai with Kimie Doi in front of Aloha Fountain
Group of men on the front steps of the newly constructed church
Jerry Miyashiro standing in front of the OK
Cafe
In 1963 the Aloha Fountain moved next door and changed its
name to the Aloha Cafe Next door was the Judo Center and Family
Market
Kiyoko Tashiro in front of Hama san Tailor Shop and the
Colonial Noodle
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 5
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - P H O T O A R C H I V E
Photo Archive
Mary and Kimie Doi outside the Aloha Fountain
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
Mihoya Confectioner Aloha Cafe and Salt Lake Judo
Center
Mary Murakami and Hideo Ochi standing in front of a car
New Kimpa Cafe Sunrise Fish Market and Dawn Noodle
House
Mary and Kiyoko Nishida on 1st South in front of the
New Kimpa Cafe
Moving supplies out of the Aloha Cafe before its
demolition
Members gathered on the steps of the church circa 1920s
Paul Iwasaki and Robin Doi with toy guns
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 6
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - P H O T O A R C H I V E
Photo Archive
Robin Doi Wade Doi Craig Nagasawa Mary Wallace and
Kimie Doi
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
View before excavation for Salt Lake Auto Parts Utah
Nippo Long Hotel American Fur Co and the Greyhound
Bus Depot
U S Cafe later the Mikado Restaurant operated by the Tsuyuki
family
Wallace and Mary Doi working in the Aloha Fountain
The Japanese Church of Christ shortly after completion
Wallace and Kimie Doi outside the Aloha Fountain
Unidentified group in front of the Japanese Church of Christ Salt
Lake City Utah
Wallace Doi and Leo Kawa at the Aloha Snack Bar
which was opened in 1947
G S B S A R C H I T E C T S
7 7
J A P A N T O W N D E S I G N S T R A T E G Y & G U I D E L I N E S / 日 本 人 まち 街 路 計 画 / M A R C H 1 5 , 2 0 2 1
6 . A P P E N D I C E S - P H O T O A R C H I V E
Photo Archive
Willie Oshiro Toshio Kokubun Jerry Miyashiro Kiyoshi Yoshii
and Willie Higa performing at the O K Cafe in Salt Lake City
Utah 1944 1945
Source: Mitsugi M. Kasai (Chief Warrant Officer, CWO 4) Memorial Japanese American Archive
J. Willard Marriott Library Special Collections Department, The University of Utah
First South Salt Lake City’s Japan Town before it was
demolished for the Salt Palace In 1923 it was also home
to the Japanese Church
Yasuko Kawakami and Susie Ariyoshi in front of Japanese
Town Sunrise Fish Market
Women s group Included Mrs Tajima Mrs Uno Mrs Takashima
Mrs. Hirasawa Mrs. McDonald Mrs. Hashimoto Mrs. Lida
Mrs. Shiba Mrs. K Suzuki Mrs. Tatai Mrs. Takasu and Mitsu
Hayakawa
Fred Mishima Mary and Wallace Doi
Young boy standing outside the Aloha Cafe
EXHIBIT C: JAPANTOWN 40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
L000
COVER SHEET
JAPANTOWN STREET
40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
SEPTEMBER 26, 2025
VICINITY MAP
SITE ORIENTATION MAP
SEE SITE
ORIENTATION MAP
MAP OF SALT LAKE CITY
100 S
20
0
W
30
0
W
SOUTH TEMPLE
DRAWING INDEX
SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME
GENERAL
G100 COVER SHEET
CIVIL
C200 SITE PLAN
C201 SITE PLAN
C202 SITE PLAN
C203 SITE PLAN
C204 SITE PLAN
C300 GRADING PLAN
C301 GRADING PLAN
C302 GRADING PLAN
C303 GRADING PLAN
C304 GRADING PLAN
C400 UTILITY PLAN
C401 UTILITY PLAN
C402 UTILITY PLAN
C403 UTILITY PLAN
C404 UTILITY PLAN
C700 DETAILS
C701 DETAILS
LANDSCAPE
LS101 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
LS102 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
LS103 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
LS104 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
LS105 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
LS801 SITE DETAILS
LS802 SITE DETAILS
LS803 SITE DETAILS
LS804 SITE DETAILS
LS805 SITE DETAILS
LS806 SITE DETAILS
LS807 SITE DETAILS
LS808 SITE DETAILS
LS809 SITE DETAILS
LS810 SITE DETAILS
LS811 SITE DETAILS
LS812 SITE DETAILS
LS813 SITE DETAILS
LS814 SITE DETAILS
LS815 SITE DETAILS
LI101 IRRIGATION PLAN
LI102 IRRIGATION PLAN
LI103 IRRIGATION PLAN
LI104 IRRIGATION PLAN
LI105 IRRIGATION PLAN
LI801 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LI802 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LI803 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LI804 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LI805 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LI806 IRRIGATION DETAILS
LP101 PLANTING PLAN
LP102 PLANTING PLAN
LP103 PLANTING PLAN
LP104 PLANTING PLAN
LP105 PLANTING PLAN
LP801 PLANTING DETAILS
LP802 PLANTING DETAILS
LP803 PLANTING DETAILS
LP804 PLANTING DETAILS
ELECTRICAL
L100 LIGHTING NOTES
L200 LIGHTING PLAN
L201 LIGHTING PLAN
L202 LIGHTING PLAN
L203 LIGHTING PLAN
L204 LIGHTING PLAN
L300 LIGHTING DETAILS
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
C200
SITE PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
0
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
C201
SITE PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
C202
SITE PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
4
)
C203
SITE PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
SCALE
C204
SITE PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
C300
GRADING
PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
0
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
C301
GRADING
PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
C302
GRADING
PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
4
)
C303
GRADING
PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
SCALE
C304
GRADING
PLAN
D
D
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
C400
UTILITY
PLAN
S SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
0
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
C401
UTILITY
PLAN
S SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
1
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
C402
UTILITY
PLAN
S
D
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
2
)
SCALE
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
4
)
C403
UTILITY
PLAN
D
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
C
2
0
3
)
SCALE
C404
UTILITY
PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
C700
DETAILS
ADA DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
CONCRETE BLOCK PAVER
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
C701
DETAILS
12
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
8'-0"
5'-0"
533
521
522
523
523
519
509
510
524511
505
501
512
516
527
518
502
520
519
511
531
514
502
503
513
531
504
504
528
533
503
502
525
508
30
0
W
E
S
T
EXISTING BUILDING
100 SOUTH
DESIGNATED
AREA FOR
PUBLIC ART
(20' x 16')
12
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
10
'
-
0
"
8'-0"
5'-0"
533
521
522
523
523
519
509
510
524511
505
501
512
516
527
518
502
520
519
511
531
514
502
503
513
531
504
504
528
533
503
502
525
508
30
0
W
E
S
T
EXISTING BUILDING
100 SOUTH
DESIGNATED
AREA FOR
PUBLIC ART
(20' x 16')
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LS101
LANDSCAPE
SITE PLAN
1
LS101
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
2
)
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
533
515
527
523
518
533 502
503
529
524
525
504
513
501501
532
509
527
518
502
531
514
513
521
516
533
506
522
526
511
501528
504
525
530
527
533
504
508
528 503
502
529
526 522
529
EXISTING
GARDEN
EV EV
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
533
515
527
523
518
533 502
503
529
524
525
504
513
501501
532
509
527
518
502
531
514
513
521
516
533
506
522
526
511
501528
504
525
530
527
533
504
508
528 503
502
529
526 522
529
EXISTING
GARDEN
EV EV
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LS102
LANDSCAPE
SITE PLAN
1
LS102
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
1
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
3
)
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
507
507
530
524
516 501
504
503
502 525 528
530 530
506
509
505
502
503
526
503
502
506
522
525
550
530
531
504
513
514
528527
527533
504
533527
508
521
528
507
EV EV
100 SOUTH
507
507
530
524
516 501
504
503
502 525 528
530 530
506
509
505
502
503
526
503
502
506
522
525
550
530
531
504
513
514
528527
527533
504
533527
508
521
528
507
EV EV
100 SOUTH
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
LS103
LANDSCAPE
SITE PLAN
1
LS103
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
2
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
4
)
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
M
523
501
532
509
527 503
509
509
550 550501
529
515
504
513
518
522
526
526
502
503
528
525
504
529
527 514
513524
511
506
503
501
533
506
511
527
EV
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
M
523
501
532
509
527 503
509
509
550 550501
529
515
504
513
518
522
526
526
502
503
528
525
504
529
527 514
513524
511
506
503
501
533
506
511
527
EV
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LS104
LANDSCAPE
SITE PLAN
1
LS104
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
3
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
5
)
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
CODE DESCRIPTION
8" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
6" THICK CONCRETE PAVING; SEE CIVIL
CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (VEHICULAR RATED
PAVER AT DRIVE AISLES) - DARK GRAY
COLOR, SEE DETAIL 1/LS802
EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE FINISH
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE,
12"X12"X3" PAVER, CHARCOAL COLOR
2' WIDE CONCRETE WATERWAY; SEE CIVIL
3'-1"X11" MAP DISPLAY, SEE DETAIL:
1/LS811
2'X5'-7"X6" SEASONS DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS815
2'X5'-7"X6" ERA'S DISPLAY SIGN; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS810
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS807
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREE GRATE; SEE
DETAIL 2/LS812
BIKE RACK; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS806
SAWCUT JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS801
EXPANSION JOINT; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS801
STRIPING; SEE CIVIL
CROSSING STENCIL MMA PAINT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS808
IN-GROUND MAP; SEE DETAIL 1/LS814
CONCRETE WHEEL STOP
CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER; SEE CIVIL
6" TALL CONCRETE PLANTER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS806
CONCRETE SEAT WALL; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS805
DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP.) ; SEE DETAIL
3/LS801
REMOVABLE BOLLARD (TYP.)
3'X1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS804
1"-4" BRONZE STRIPE; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS804
STREET LIGHT POLE WIITH BANNER; SEE
ELEC. & DETAIL: 1/LS815
PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE; SEE ELECTRICAL
CUSTOM MANHOLE COVER; SEE DETAIL:
1/LS812
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT; SEE
DETAIL: 1/LS803
STONE BLOCK BENCH W/ WOOD SEAT -
BACKED; SEE DETAIL: 2/LS803
CURVED WOOD BENCH; SEE DETAIL:
2/LS805
EV CHARGER; SEE ELECTRICAL
PLANTING AREA; SEE PLANTING PLAN
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
550
REFERENCE NOTE SHEDULE
8'-0"
523
510
501
533
516
512
521
515
526
509
503
502
511
524
525
518
503
533
501
506
520
550
522
521
504
505
501
513
508533
513
531
528
503527
514
513
527
531528
511
20
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH
DESIGNATED
AREA FOR
PUBLIC ART
(20' x 16')
8'-0"
523
510
501
533
516
512
521
515
526
509
503
502
511
524
525
518
503
533
501
506
520
550
522
521
504
505
501
513
508533
513
531
528
503527
514
513
527
531528
511
20
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH
DESIGNATED
AREA FOR
PUBLIC ART
(20' x 16')
LS105
LANDSCAPE
SITE PLAN
1
LS105
LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
S
1
0
4
)
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
LS801
SITE DETAILS
LS801
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
SAWCUT CONTROL JOINT
1" = 1'-0"
DEPTH OF CUT TO BE 1 4 THE DEPTH OF
SLAB PLUS 1 4". MAKE ALL SAW CUTS
WITHIN 12 HR. OF CONCRETE POUR
SAWCUT CONTROL JOINT
TYPICAL CONCRETE
PAVING
2
P-JT-55LS801
DECORATIVE BOLLARD
1/2" = 1'-0"
8
1
/
8
"
9 1/16"
3'
-
0
"
15
/
1
6
"
FINISH GRADE
8 1/8"8"
3'
-
0
"
STEEL BEAM
COLOR: BRONZE
WOOD ACCENT
PANELS
COLOR: TEAK
ALTERNATE: STEEL
BOLLARD CORE BOLLARD
3
P-JT-73LS801
CONCRETE CURB,
WALL, ETC.
CONCRETE PAVING AT VERTICAL PLANE
ENLARGED TYPICAL SEALANT JOINT - NTS
PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT
FILLER PER SPECIFICATIONS
TYPICAL 1/4" TOOLED RADIUS EDGE
TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVING
FOAM BACKER ROD
MASTER SEALANT, PER SPECIFICATIONS,
COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVING. WIDTH
TO DEPTH RATIO OF MASTIC PER
MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS
TYPICAL CONCRETE PAVING
SEALANT JOINT, SEE
ENLARGEMENT DETAIL
EXPANSION JOINT
1" = 1'-0"
1
P-JT-74
LS802
SITE DETAILS
CONC. UNIT PAVER @ CONC. EDGE
NTS
4"
9"6"
4"
7"
STRUCTURAL SOIL
COMPACT SUBGRADE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
3'
M
I
N
.
MONOLITHIC CONSTRUCTION 5
WITH 2" DIA. DRAIN HOLES
18" O.C. (AT LOW END ONLY)
ANY PAVERS THAT ARE CUT
TO FIT MUST BE AT LEAST
1/2 THE ORIGINAL PAVER SIZE
WRAP FABRIC
VERTICALLY UPWARD
TO MEET PAVER
THICKNESS
1/2" MIN.
1" MAX.
2
6
36
7
2
1
1
P-JT-63
SHEET KEYNOTES:
1. STRUCTURAL SOIL
·EXTENDS BETWEEN TREES FROM THE BACK OF
CURB TO A MAXIMUM OF 15' OR TO EDGE OF
CONCRETE IF LESS THAN 15' PARALLEL TO THE
CURB UNLESS VAULTS OR OTHER OBJECTS
PREVENT THIS. EXTEND SOIL 10' BEYOND THE TREE
GRATE FOR END TREES
2. CONCRETE REF. CIVIL
3. CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS (APWA 32 14 13)
·SIZE: 60 X 200 X 100 MM
·COLOR: DARK GREY
4. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC (APWA 32 14 13)
·NON-WOVEN
·SPAN 2" DIA. DRAINAGE HOLE PLUS 2 INCHES
5. PEA GRAVEL (APWA 31 05 13)
·ASTM SIZE NO. 6 OR 7
6. BEDDING AND JOINT SAND (ASTM C 144)
·NATURAL OR MANUFACTURED
7. JOINT SAND STABILIZER
·WATER BASED POLYMER SEALER CAPABLE OF
PENETRATING THE JOINT SAND TO A DEPTH OF 1/2
LS802
TREE GRATE @ CONC. UNIT PAVER
NTS
4"
6"
1"
6"9"
3'
M
I
N
.
COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR
FRAME
WELD
ANY PAVERS THAT ARE CUT
TO FIT MUST BE AT LEAST
1/2 THE ORIGINAL PAVER SIZE 1/4" X 5" STEEL PLATE
PAINTED BLACK; LENGTH
DETERMINED BY TREE
GRATE USED
3/8" X 3" EXPANSION
ANCHOR 16" O.C. FOR
LENGTH OF PLATE
STRUCTURAL SOIL 1
GRATE
AIR SPACE
MULCH
2
P-JT-64LS802
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LS803
SITE DETAILS
LS803
LS803
1'-1 1/2"
CONC. UNIT PAVERS,
SEE DETAIL:
TOE-KICK
10" STAINLESS STEEL
DOWEL
1'-6"
2 1/4"
2 1/4"
1'
-
3
"
3"
FINISH GRADE OF
ADJACENT CONC.
PAVEMENT;
SEE SITE PLAN
BROWN'S CANYON SANDSTONE
BLOCK BENCH
1x4 WOOD SLATS. SPACE 5/8"
3 - 2x2 WOOD CROSS SUPPORTS,
EQ. SPACED. FASTEN TO STONE
TOP WITH MASONRY ANCHORS.
STONE BLOCK W/ WOOD SEAT
3/4" = 1'-0"
1/LS802
1
P-JT-66LS803
1'-1 1/2"
CONC. UNIT PAVERS,
SEE DETAIL:
TOE-KICK
10" STAINLESS STEEL
DOWEL
1'-6"
2 1/4"
2 1/4"
1'
-
3
"
3"
FINISH GRADE OF
ADJACENT CONCRETE
PAVEMENT;
SEE SITE PLAN
BROWN'S CANYON SANDSTONE
BLOCK BENCH
1x4 WOOD SLATS.
SPACE 5/8"
3 - 2x2 WOOD CROSS
SUPPORTS, EQ.
SPACED. FASTEN TO
STONE TOP WITH
MASONRY ANCHORS.
STONE BLOCK BACKED BENCH
3/4" = 1'-0"
1/LS802
2
P-JT-67
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
STONE BLOCK
6" = 1'-0"
8'-0"
FINISH GRADE
SUB-BASE COMPACTED TO 95%
AGGREGATE COMPACTED TO 90%
CONCRETE BASE
10
"
1'
-
3
"
3
P-JT-45
LS804
SITE DETAILS
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
1" OR 4"; SEE SITE
PLAN
BRONZE STRIPE PAVING
1" MORTAR SETTING BED
CAULK WITH GRAY SEALANT
CONCRETE PAVING, REF. CIVIL
BRONZE STRIPE PAVING
3/8" = 1'-0"
2" = 1'-0"
2
P-JT-70LS804
2" = 1'-0"
2"
1/4"
3'-0" x 1'-6"
1" MORTAR SETTING BED
CAULK WITH GRAY SEALANT
CONCRETE PAVING, REF. CIVIL
3' X 1'-6" BRONZE PLAQUE
3/8" = 1'-0"
BRONZE PLAQUE,
SEE DETAIL 1/LS809
FOR TEXT & ELEMENTS
1
P-JT-75LS804
LS805
SITE DETAILS
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
CONCRETE SEATWALL
3/4" = 1'-0"
1'-6"
1'
-
8
"
ADJACENT CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
EXPANSION JOINT
#4 REBAR, 16" O.C., BOTH
DIRECTION
ADJACENT PLANTER
OR PAVEMENT, SEE
SITE PLAN
95% COMPACTED
AGGREGATE BASE
ARCHITECTURAL
CONCRETE WALL WITH
SMOOTH FINISH ON
ALL EXPOSED SIDES.
PARGING NOT
PERMITTED
3"
C
L
R
.
A
L
L
DI
R
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
4"
4"
4"
90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE
NOTE: PROVIDE
VERTICAL SCORE
JOINTS ON TOP AND
FACE OF SEATWALL
EVERY 8' O.C.
1/2" CHAMFER, TYP.
P-JT-56
1
LS805
CURVED BENCH (ONE SECTION)
3/8" = 1'-0"
51 1/4"
2"x3" (NOM.)
WOOD SLAT
1'-7"
1'
-
6
"
1'-2 3/4"1/2" X 6"
STEEL BAR
3/8" THICK
STEEL PLATE 5/16" X 1 1/4"
STAINLESS
STEEL BTN SKT
HD LAG SCR
1/2" X 1" S, TL,
CGE BOLT W/
WASHER & THIN
LOCK NUT
9/16" DIA. HOLEPLANSECTION
AXONOMETRIC
45
2
P-JT-68LS805
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LS806
SITE DETAILS
6" CONCRETE CURB
2" = 1'-0"
CONCRETE CURB
1/2" TOOLED EDGE
CONCRETE PAVING
OR UNIT PAVERS
4"
1
1
/
2
"
PLANTING AREA
COMPACTED
AGGREGATE BASE
COMPACTED
SUBGRADE
6"
9"
4"
1
P-JT-71LS806
INVERTED "U" BIKE RACK
1/2" = 1'-0"
NPS 1 1/4" OR
1 1/2", TYP.
SURFACE MOUNT
MOUNTING BOLTS
PER MANUFACTURER
RECOMMENDATION
30
-
3
6
"
24-30"
2
P-JT-72LS806
STREET ENTRY MONUMENT
3/8” = 1’-0”LS807
1 LS807
SITE DETAILS
EAST/WEST
ELEVATION
NORTH/SOUTH
ELEVATION ELEVATION
SECTION A
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
ຊ
ਓ
ொ
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
1'-10"
1'
-
0
"
4"
6'
-
4
"
4'
-
0
"
AXONOMETRIC VIEW
10
"
2'-6"
4"4"
4"
18
'
-
6
"
ALUMINUM ANGLES ON 4
SIDES. CENTERED ON
CORNER POSTS.
ALL EXPOSED ALUMINUM TO
BE PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS
PAINT DARK CHARCOAL,
SATIN FINISH.
CONCEAL ANY STRUCTURAL
ELEMENT/CONNECTION.
SEE SHEET LS101 & LS105
FOR LOCATIONS.
1/8” ALUMINUM SHEET
LASER CUT PATTERN AND
PAINTED.
0.125 ALUMINUM FABRICATED
EXTERIOR COVER TO PROVIDE
1/8” LIP AROUND TO HAVE
THE PATTERN SHEET TO SIT
FLUSH ON.
0.125 ALUMINUM WITH LASER
CUT LETTERS AND GRAPHICS.
RESIN LENS PANEL TO BE
PLACED RIGHT BEHIND. DO
NOT PROVIDE ANY GAP.
1/8” ALUMINUM SHEET
LASER CUT PATTERN AND
PAINTED
ALUMINUM ANGLES
ON 4 SIDES. CENTERED
ON CORNER POSTS.
AA
CONCEALED LED LIGHTING.
COORDINATE WITH ELEC.
COLOR TEMPERATURE AND
COLOR TO BE ADJUSTABLE.
FROSTED WHITE TRANSLUCENT
1/4” RESIN PANEL. CONCEAL
PANEL CONNECTIONS AND
HARDWARE.
ALUMINUM SQUARE TUBE
STRUCTURE FRAMING.
0.125 ALUMINUM
FABRICATED EXTERIOR
COVER.
FABRICATED ALUMINUM
FAUX TOP.
SLC JAPANTOWN LOGO
“OKAGE SAMA DE”
TRANSLATION: “I AM WHO
I AM BECAUSE OF YOU.”
TRANSLATION:
JAPANESE TOWN
FROSTED WHITE
TRANSLUCENT 1/4” RESIN
PANEL LENS.
FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL REQ.
EXPOSED CONCRETE
TO BE ARCHITECTURAL
FINISH.
2'-6"
5"
2'
-
6
"
4"
5'
-
4
"
09/26/2025
CROSSWALK PATTERN
NOT TO SCALELS808
1 LS808
SITE DETAILS
MMA PAINT APPLICATION WITH
REQUIRED COATING. PROVIDE 2’
WHITE PAINTED BAND ON EACH END.
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
DIMENSIONS.
FINAL DESIGN TBD
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR
THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CROSS
WALKS.
OVERALL CROSSWALK PATTERN LAYOUT
CROSSWALK - WEST CROSSWALK - EASTCROSSWALK - CENTER
09/26/2025
TIMELINE ELEMENTS DETAIL
1 1/2” = 1’-0”LS809
1 LS809
SITE DETAILS
ETCHED BRONZE:
1
8
8
0
s
|
明
治
１
０
年
台
JAPANESE LABORERS
ARRIVE IN UTAH
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer
adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod
tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat
volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tationex ea commodo.
3’ X 1’-6” CAST BRONZE PLAQUE. EMBEDDED
INTO CONCRETE PAVING.
FINAL DESIGN TBD
JOINT LOCATIONS. SEE SITE PLAN.
TRANSLATION—”MEIJI ERA 10s”
9” EXPOSED AGGREGATE SURFACE
BAND TO FOLLOW THE TIMELINE.
SEE SITE PLAN.
4” BRONZE STRIP EMBEDDED INTO CONCRETE
PAVEMENT. 20-25 SECTIONS TO BE ETCHED WITH
LETTERS & NUMBERS AND FILLED.
PLAN VIEW
3'-0"
1'
-
6
"
9"4"
1"
09/26/2025
ERA’S DISPLAYS TYP.
3/8” = 1’-0”LS810
1
LS810
SITE DETAILS
FRONT
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - FRONT & BACK
SINGLE SIDED BACKSIDE-RIGHT SIDE-LEFT
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
͓
͔
͛
͞
·
Ͱ
I
A
M
W
H
O
I
A
M
B
E
C
A
U
S
E
O
F
Y
O
U
I AM WHO I AM BECAUSE OF YOU
1 9 3 0 - 1 9 5 0 | 昭 和 五 年 - 昭 和 ２５ 年
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum
dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in
hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue
duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam,
O K
A
G
E
S
A
M
A
D
E
WOOD PANELS:
2”X8” THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS. APPLY A CLEAR
COAT, SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPER DECK OR EQUIVALENT.
STEEL FRAMING:
1/2” BASE AND VERTICAL CENTER PLATES, AND 1/4” STEEL
PLATE FOR OTHER HORIZONTAL PANELS.
PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS PAINT DARK BRONZE, OR
AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EXTERIOR PAINT. MATTE FINISH.
ALL JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND EDGES AND CORNERS
SMOOTHED.
QUANTITY:
FIVE (5) TOTAL. THREE (3) SINGLE SIDED BACK AND
TWO (2) DOUBLE SIDED BACK PANELS.
THIS IS A NON-ILLUMINATED SIGN.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
INFORMATION PANEL:
HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE FULL COLOR PRINTED PANEL.
1/4” THICKNESS. MOUNTED TO THE WOOD PLANKS BEHIND.
PANELS TO HAVE 45 DEGREE ANGLE CUTS TO SIT FLUSH
WITH OTHER CONNECTING PANELS. CONCEAL ALL
MOUNTING HARDWARE. PANELS MUST BE SERVICEABLE
INDIVISUALLY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
FRONT: 1’-8” X 3’-6“
SIDE: 5.5” X 3’-6”
BACK: 7” X 3’-6”
PREDRILL HOLES FOR THE MOUNTING HARDWARE TO
RECESS INTO THE HOLES. USE TAMPER RESISTANT MINIMALY
VISIBLE HARDWARE. EACH PLANK SHOULD COME OFF
SEPARATELY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - SIDE
WOOD PLANKS2 2
1/4” PLATE CAP
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS.
3'
-
6
"
6"
2'-0"
1'-8"
6'
-
4
"
2'
-
4
"
6"
5'
-
7
"
7"
DOUBLE SIDED BACK
I AM WHO I AM BECAUSE OF YOU
1 9 3 0 - 1 9 5 0 | 昭 和 五 年 - 昭 和 ２５ 年
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis
nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum
dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in
hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue
duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna
aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam,
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
͓
͔
͛
͞
·
Ͱ
I
A
M
W
H
O
I
A
M
B
E
C
A
U
S
E
O
F
Y
O
U
O
K
A
G
E
S
A
M
A
D
E
COORDINATE FOOTING WITH
STRUCTURAL ENG.
EXPOSED CONCRETE TO BE
ARCHITECTURAL FINISH.
8"8"8"2"
6"
6"
3/4"
1/4"
2'-0"
6"
2"
2"
2"
1/2"
6"
6"
1/2"
3'
-
6
"
1'-8"
2"
09/26/2025
MAP DISPLAY TYP.
1 1/2” = 1’-0”LS811
1 LS811
SITE DETAILS
1/2” STEEL PANEL
1/2” STEEL BASE PANEL
CONCRETE FOOTING
COORDINATE WITH
STRUCTURAL ENG.
1/4” STEEL PANEL
2”X8” WOOD PANEL
1/4” THICK STEEL FRAME
1/2” DEEP
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK STEEL FRAME
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
45 DEGREE ANGLE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
PLACED INSIDE OF THE
FRAME
FRONT VIEW EXTERIOR SIDE VIEW
STEEL FRAMING:
1/2” BASE AND VERTICAL CENTER PLATES. 1/4” PLATE TO
BE USED FOR THE REMAINING.
PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS PAINT DARK BRONZE, OR
AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EXTERIOR PAINT. MATTE FINISH.
ALL JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND EDGES AND CORNERS
SMOOTHED.
WOOD PANELS:
2”X8” THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD
PLANKS. APPLY A CLEAR COAT,
SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPER DECK OR
EQUIVALENT.
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS.
2’-8” FROM GROUND TO THE
CENTER OF THE SIGN
INFORMATION PANEL:
HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE FULL COLOR PRINTED
PANEL. 1/4” THICKNESS. MOUNTED TO THE WOOD
PLANKS BEHIND. PANELS TO HAVE 45 DEGREE
ANGLE CUTS TO SIT FLUSH WITH OTHER
CONNECTING PANELS. CONCEAL ALL MOUNTING
HARDWARE. PANELS SHOULD BE SERVISEABLE
INDIVISUALLY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
SIZE: 36”X14”
FINAL DESIGN TBD
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - EXTERIOR SIDES
2”X8” THERMALLY
MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS.
PRE-DRILLED HOLE
FOR BOLTS
2”X8” THERMALLY
MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS.
1/2” STEEL PANEL
1/2” STEEL PANEL
COUNTERSUNK
BOLTS
COUNTERSUNK
BOLTS
1/4” STEEL PANEL
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - FRONT & BACK
1/4” STEEL PANEL
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
1/4” THICK STEEL PLATE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
SECURED FROM THE BACK SIDE
INFORMATIONAL PANEL
PLACED INSIDE OF THE FRAME
1/2” DEEP, 1/4” THICK
STEEL FRAME
A
A
SECTION A
2"
1/2"
6"
1/4"
1'-2"
1/2"
1/4"
6"
1/4"
1/2"
9 1/4"
1/2"
1/2"6"2 3/4"
2"
3'-0 1/2"
1/4"1/4"
2'
-
8
"
4"4"
2'
-
4
1/4"
1'
-
8
1/4"
8"
09/26/2025
LS812
SITE DETAILS
S A L T L A KE CITY JAPANTOWN
•
E
S
T. 1907 • おかげさまで • OKAGE SAMA DE • I AM WH
O
I
A
M
BECAUSE OF YOU •
TREE GRATE DESIGN
3/4” = 1’-0”LS812
2MANHOLE COVER
NTSLS812
1
CUSTOM CAST IRON MANHOLE COVER TO BE
USED OVER CITY OWNED UTILITIES AND PRIVATE
UTILITIES UPON PERMISSION.
APPROXIMATE SIZE: 3’ DIA.
TWO (2) CUSTOM DESIGNS.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR QUANTITY.
CUSTOM CAST IRON TREEGRATES
TOTAL THICKNESS: 1.25”
INSTALL FRAME PER MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS. NO OPENING GREATER
THAN 1/2. GREY AREAS INDICATE 3/8”
RECESSED AREAS, DO NOT KNOCK OUT.
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
FOUR (4) CUSTOM DESIGNS.
FABRICATED IN 4 SECTIONS FOR ACCESS.
18” OPENING FOR TREE.
INSTALL EACH TREE GRATE WITH
PATTERN FACING THE SAME
DIRECTION. FINAL DESIGN TBD
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR
QUANTITY.
PLAN VIEW
PLAN VIEW
5'
-
0
"
1'
-
6
"
09/26/2025
LS813
SITE DETAILS
CUSTOM CONCRETE STAMPS
PRESSED ON WET CONCRETE, RECESS
TO BE NO MORE THAN 1/4” DEEP.
THREE (3) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “AUTUMN” AREA.
FOUR (4) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “WINTER” AREA.
CUSTOM CONCRETE STAMP EXAMPLE
3/4” = 1’-0”LS813
1
CUSTOM ONE POINT ELEMENTS STAMPED ON THE
CONCRETE PAVEMENT.
APPROXIMATE FREQUENCY OF STAMPING AND SIZE OF
ELEMENTS SHOWN. EACH STAMP SIZE VARY BETWEEN
2”X2”-5”X5”.
JOINTS
PLAN VIEW
STAMP DESIGN - “WINTER”
STAMP DESIGN - “AUTUMN”
THREE (3) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “SUMMER” AREA.
SIX (6) CUSTOM DESIGNS FOR THE “SPRING” AREA.
“SPRING” AREA
“AUTUMN” AREA “WINTER” AREA
“SUMMER” AREA
STAMP DESIGN - “SPRING”
STAMP DESIGN - “SUMMER”
STAMPED CONCRETE
KEY PLAN
3'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
3'-0"3'-0"
09/26/2025
LIGHT POLE BANNERS TYP.
3/8” = 1’-0”LS814
1 LS814
SITE DETAILS
LI
G
H
T
P
O
L
E
BANNER ARM (REFER TO
LIGHT POLE DETAIL)
DOUBLE SIDED POLYESTER FABRIC BANNER.
FULL COLOR PRINTED.
FOUR (4) VARIATIONS, DISTRIBUTED
EVENLY. TWO(2) BANNERS PER VEHICULAR
LIGHT POLE.
SEE ELECTRICAL SHEET FOR LOCATIONS
AND QUANTITY.
BANNER VARIATION: FOUR BANNER VARIATION TO
BE CREATED TO REPRESENT AND BE SWAPPED
FOR EACH SEASON.
LIGHT POLE- REFERENCE
ELECTRICAL SHEET.
FOUR (4) LOOP HANGING
LOOPS TO BE SEWN.
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S
A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
KEY PLAN
VEHICULAR LIGHT POLE LOCATION
4"
8'
-
0
"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
4 5/8"
4"
2'-6"
7'
-
4
1/8"
4"
09/26/2025
SEASONS DISPLAY TYP.
3/8” = 1’-0”LS815
1 LS815
SITE DETAILS
FRONT
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - FRONT & BACK
BACKSIDE-RIGHT SIDE-LEFT
WOOD PANELS:
2”X8” THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD PLANKS. APPLY A CLEAR
COAT, SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPER DECK OR EQUIVALENT.
STEEL FRAMING:
1/2” BASE AND VERTICAL CENTER PLATES, AND 1/4” STEEL
PLATE FOR OTHER HORIZONTAL PANELS.
PAINTED WITH MATTHEWS PAINT DARK BRONZE, OR
AUTOMOTIVE GRADE EXTERIOR PAINT. MATTE FINISH.
ALL JOINTS TO BE WELDED AND EDGES AND CORNERS
SMOOTHED.
INFORMATION PANEL:
HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE FULL COLOR PRINTED PANEL.
1/4” THICKNESS. MOUNTED TO THE WOOD PLANKS BEHIND.
PANELS TO HAVE 45 DEGREE ANGLE CUTS TO SIT FLUSH
WITH OTHER CONNECTING PANELS. CONCEAL ALL
MOUNTING HARDWARE. INCLUDE WAYFINDING DIRECTIONS
TO LANDMARKS NEARBY—NO MORE THAN FIVE LINES.
PANELS MUST BE SERVICEABLE INDIVISUALLY IF
REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
FRONT: 1’-8” X 3’-6“
SIDE: 5.5” X 3’-6”
BACK: 7” X 3’-6”
PREDRILL HOLES FOR THE MOUNTING HARDWARE TO
RECESS INTO THE HOLES. USE TAMPER RESISTANT MINIMALY
VISIBLE HARDWARE. EACH PLANK SHOULD COME OFF
SEPARATELY IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
DISPLAY BASE DETAIL - SIDE
WOOD PLANKS2 2
1/4” PLATE CAP
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
WELDED JOINT
SEE LANDSCAPE SITE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS.
FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL REQ.
EXPOSED CONCRETE
TO BE ARCHITECTURAL
FINISH.
2'-0"
8"8"8"2"
6"
6"
3/4"
1/4"
6'
-
4
"
2'-0"
6"
2"
1/2"
2"
6"
5'
-
7
"
2"
1/2"
6"
6"
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E
S
T
.
1
9
0
7
I A M W H O I A M B E C A U S E O F Y O U
CHILDREN’S DAY
S U M M E R | 卯 月 皐 月 水 無 月
CONVENTION CENTER
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
JAPANESE BUDDHIST TEMPLE
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
OBON FESTIVAL
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
O K A G E S A M A D E
お か げ さ ま で
3'
-
6
"
6"
1'-8"
2'
-
4
"
QUANTITY:
FOUR (4) TOTAL. NON-ILLUMINATED, DOUBLE SIDED.
2"
FINAL DESIGN TBD.
CHILDREN’S DAY
S U M M E R | 卯 月 皐 月 水 無 月
GATEWAY SHOPPING CENTER
ARENA
JAPANESE CHURCH OF CHRIST
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi.
OBON FESTIVAL
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, cons ectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
JAPANESE GARDEN
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT
I A M W H O I A M B E C A U S E O F Y O U
O K A G E S A M A D E
お か げ さ ま で
+
"
1
"
/
5
0
8
/
S A
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
E S
T
.
1
9
0
7
1'-8"
1/2"
09/26/2025
30
0
W
E
S
T
EXISTING BUILDING
100 SOUTH
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-SOCK 1401
MINI ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18.0"
LONG WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE AND
RAIN BIRD 1401 0.25 GPM OR 1402 0.5 GPM BUBBLER AS
INDICATED. WITH CHECK VALVE, AND SAND SOCK FOR
SANDY SOIL.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-LC
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, FOR LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES. 1" PEB VALVE, WITH 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI
BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.
PIPE TRANSITION POINT IN DRIP BOX
PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING
WITH RISER IN 6" (150MM) DRIP BOX.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT 12"
O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1", 1-1/2", 2" PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES. LOW FLOW
OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 3-RC
3/4" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 1-PIECE BODY.
RAIN BIRD EFB-CP-PRS-D 1-1/2"
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2" BRASS MASTER VALVE, THAT IS
CONTAMINATION PROOF W/SELF-FLUSHING FILTER SCREEN.
GLOBE CONFIGURATION, RECLAIMED WATER COMPATIBLE,
AND PURPLE HANDLE COVER DESIGNATES NON-POTABLE
WATER USE. WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR.
ZURN 375 1-1/2"
REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2",3/4",
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2".
HUNTER ACC-1200-PED-SS
12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE
REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. STAINLESS STEEL
PEDESTAL. INCLUDE (1) RM-EV-ANT-FD ANTENNAE, (1)
HU-ACC-COM-HWR COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, (1)
HU-RAD3 UHF RADIO (000460.23750000MHZ)
FLOMEC QS200-10
1" INSERTION FLOWMETER, SCHEDULE 80 PVC HOUSING.
0.22-33 GPM RANGE, MAX. OPERATING PRESSURE 150PSI.
2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND
PULSE. STORAGE TEMPS -20 F TO +160 F.
STRONG BOX SBBC-30AL
LOW PROFILE BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE, WITH MARINE GRADE
ALUMINUM. 30"L, 30"H, 16.25"W (76.2CM L, 76.2CM H,
41.275CM W).
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: DUCTILE IRON PIPE- CLASS 350
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
1401 1402
BFE
VALVE NUMBER
VALVE SIZE
VALVE GPM
VALVE CALLOUT
##
#"
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
LI101
IRRIGATION PLAN
1
LI101
IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
2
)
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
EXISTING
GARDEN
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-SOCK 1401
MINI ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18.0"
LONG WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE AND
RAIN BIRD 1401 0.25 GPM OR 1402 0.5 GPM BUBBLER AS
INDICATED. WITH CHECK VALVE, AND SAND SOCK FOR
SANDY SOIL.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-LC
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, FOR LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES. 1" PEB VALVE, WITH 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI
BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.
PIPE TRANSITION POINT IN DRIP BOX
PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING
WITH RISER IN 6" (150MM) DRIP BOX.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT 12"
O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1", 1-1/2", 2" PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES. LOW FLOW
OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 3-RC
3/4" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 1-PIECE BODY.
RAIN BIRD EFB-CP-PRS-D 1-1/2"
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2" BRASS MASTER VALVE, THAT IS
CONTAMINATION PROOF W/SELF-FLUSHING FILTER SCREEN.
GLOBE CONFIGURATION, RECLAIMED WATER COMPATIBLE,
AND PURPLE HANDLE COVER DESIGNATES NON-POTABLE
WATER USE. WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR.
ZURN 375 1-1/2"
REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2",3/4",
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2".
HUNTER ACC-1200-PED-SS
12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE
REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. STAINLESS STEEL
PEDESTAL. INCLUDE (1) RM-EV-ANT-FD ANTENNAE, (1)
HU-ACC-COM-HWR COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, (1)
HU-RAD3 UHF RADIO (000460.23750000MHZ)
FLOMEC QS200-10
1" INSERTION FLOWMETER, SCHEDULE 80 PVC HOUSING.
0.22-33 GPM RANGE, MAX. OPERATING PRESSURE 150PSI.
2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND
PULSE. STORAGE TEMPS -20 F TO +160 F.
STRONG BOX SBBC-30AL
LOW PROFILE BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE, WITH MARINE GRADE
ALUMINUM. 30"L, 30"H, 16.25"W (76.2CM L, 76.2CM H,
41.275CM W).
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: DUCTILE IRON PIPE- CLASS 350
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
1401 1402
BFE
VALVE NUMBER
VALVE SIZE
VALVE GPM
VALVE CALLOUT
##
#"
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
LI102
IRRIGATION PLAN
1
LI102
IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
1
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
3
)
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
100 SOUTH
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-SOCK 1401
MINI ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18.0"
LONG WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE AND
RAIN BIRD 1401 0.25 GPM OR 1402 0.5 GPM BUBBLER AS
INDICATED. WITH CHECK VALVE, AND SAND SOCK FOR
SANDY SOIL.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-LC
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, FOR LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES. 1" PEB VALVE, WITH 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI
BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.
PIPE TRANSITION POINT IN DRIP BOX
PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING
WITH RISER IN 6" (150MM) DRIP BOX.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT 12"
O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1", 1-1/2", 2" PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES. LOW FLOW
OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 3-RC
3/4" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 1-PIECE BODY.
RAIN BIRD EFB-CP-PRS-D 1-1/2"
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2" BRASS MASTER VALVE, THAT IS
CONTAMINATION PROOF W/SELF-FLUSHING FILTER SCREEN.
GLOBE CONFIGURATION, RECLAIMED WATER COMPATIBLE,
AND PURPLE HANDLE COVER DESIGNATES NON-POTABLE
WATER USE. WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR.
ZURN 375 1-1/2"
REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2",3/4",
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2".
HUNTER ACC-1200-PED-SS
12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE
REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. STAINLESS STEEL
PEDESTAL. INCLUDE (1) RM-EV-ANT-FD ANTENNAE, (1)
HU-ACC-COM-HWR COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, (1)
HU-RAD3 UHF RADIO (000460.23750000MHZ)
FLOMEC QS200-10
1" INSERTION FLOWMETER, SCHEDULE 80 PVC HOUSING.
0.22-33 GPM RANGE, MAX. OPERATING PRESSURE 150PSI.
2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND
PULSE. STORAGE TEMPS -20 F TO +160 F.
STRONG BOX SBBC-30AL
LOW PROFILE BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE, WITH MARINE GRADE
ALUMINUM. 30"L, 30"H, 16.25"W (76.2CM L, 76.2CM H,
41.275CM W).
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: DUCTILE IRON PIPE- CLASS 350
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
1401 1402
BFE
VALVE NUMBER
VALVE SIZE
VALVE GPM
VALVE CALLOUT
##
#"
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
LI1031
LI103
IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
2
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
4
)
IRRIGATION PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
BFE
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-SOCK 1401
MINI ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18.0"
LONG WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE AND
RAIN BIRD 1401 0.25 GPM OR 1402 0.5 GPM BUBBLER AS
INDICATED. WITH CHECK VALVE, AND SAND SOCK FOR
SANDY SOIL.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-LC
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, FOR LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES. 1" PEB VALVE, WITH 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI
BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.
PIPE TRANSITION POINT IN DRIP BOX
PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING
WITH RISER IN 6" (150MM) DRIP BOX.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT 12"
O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1", 1-1/2", 2" PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES. LOW FLOW
OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 3-RC
3/4" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 1-PIECE BODY.
RAIN BIRD EFB-CP-PRS-D 1-1/2"
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2" BRASS MASTER VALVE, THAT IS
CONTAMINATION PROOF W/SELF-FLUSHING FILTER SCREEN.
GLOBE CONFIGURATION, RECLAIMED WATER COMPATIBLE,
AND PURPLE HANDLE COVER DESIGNATES NON-POTABLE
WATER USE. WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR.
ZURN 375 1-1/2"
REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2",3/4",
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2".
HUNTER ACC-1200-PED-SS
12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE
REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. STAINLESS STEEL
PEDESTAL. INCLUDE (1) RM-EV-ANT-FD ANTENNAE, (1)
HU-ACC-COM-HWR COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, (1)
HU-RAD3 UHF RADIO (000460.23750000MHZ)
FLOMEC QS200-10
1" INSERTION FLOWMETER, SCHEDULE 80 PVC HOUSING.
0.22-33 GPM RANGE, MAX. OPERATING PRESSURE 150PSI.
2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND
PULSE. STORAGE TEMPS -20 F TO +160 F.
STRONG BOX SBBC-30AL
LOW PROFILE BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE, WITH MARINE GRADE
ALUMINUM. 30"L, 30"H, 16.25"W (76.2CM L, 76.2CM H,
41.275CM W).
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: DUCTILE IRON PIPE- CLASS 350
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
1401 1402
BFE
VALVE NUMBER
VALVE SIZE
VALVE GPM
VALVE CALLOUT
##
#"
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
LI1041
LI104
IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
3
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
5
)
IRRIGATION PLAN
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
20
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD RWS-M-B-C-SOCK 1401
MINI ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 4.0" DIAMETER X 18.0"
LONG WITH LOCKING GRATE, SEMI-RIGID MESH TUBE AND
RAIN BIRD 1401 0.25 GPM OR 1402 0.5 GPM BUBBLER AS
INDICATED. WITH CHECK VALVE, AND SAND SOCK FOR
SANDY SOIL.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-LC
WIDE FLOW DRIP CONTROL KIT, FOR LIGHT COMMERCIAL
USES. 1" PEB VALVE, WITH 1" PRESSURE REGULATING 40PSI
BASKET FILTER. 0.3GPM TO 20GPM.
PIPE TRANSITION POINT IN DRIP BOX
PIPE TRANSITION POINT FROM PVC LATERAL TO DRIP TUBING
WITH RISER IN 6" (150MM) DRIP BOX.
AREA TO RECEIVE DRIPLINE
RAIN BIRD XFS-06-12
XFS SUB-SURFACE PRESSURE COMPENSATING DRIPLINE
W/COPPER SHIELD TECHNOLOGY. 0.6 GPH EMITTERS AT 12"
O.C. LATERALS SPACED AT 12" APART, WITH EMITTERS
OFFSET FOR TRIANGULAR PATTERN. UV RESISTANT. SPECIFY
XF INSERT FITTINGS.
SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION
RAIN BIRD PEB
1", 1-1/2", 2" PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL VALVES. LOW FLOW
OPERATING CAPABILITY, GLOBE CONFIGURATION.
RAIN BIRD 3-RC
3/4" BRASS QUICK-COUPLING VALVE, WITH
CORROSION-RESISTANT STAINLESS STEEL SPRING,
THERMOPLASTIC RUBBER COVER, AND 1-PIECE BODY.
RAIN BIRD EFB-CP-PRS-D 1-1/2"
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2" BRASS MASTER VALVE, THAT IS
CONTAMINATION PROOF W/SELF-FLUSHING FILTER SCREEN.
GLOBE CONFIGURATION, RECLAIMED WATER COMPATIBLE,
AND PURPLE HANDLE COVER DESIGNATES NON-POTABLE
WATER USE. WITH PRESSURE REGULATOR.
ZURN 375 1-1/2"
REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE ASSEMBLY. SIZES 1/2",3/4",
1", 1-1/4", 1-1/2", 2".
HUNTER ACC-1200-PED-SS
12 STATION OUTDOOR MODULAR CONTROLLER. NO MODULE
REQUIRED. HIGH-END COMMERCIAL USE. STAINLESS STEEL
PEDESTAL. INCLUDE (1) RM-EV-ANT-FD ANTENNAE, (1)
HU-ACC-COM-HWR COMMUNICATION HARDWARE, (1)
HU-RAD3 UHF RADIO (000460.23750000MHZ)
FLOMEC QS200-10
1" INSERTION FLOWMETER, SCHEDULE 80 PVC HOUSING.
0.22-33 GPM RANGE, MAX. OPERATING PRESSURE 150PSI.
2-WIRE CONNECTOR W/ LED INDICATORS FOR POWER AND
PULSE. STORAGE TEMPS -20 F TO +160 F.
STRONG BOX SBBC-30AL
LOW PROFILE BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE, WITH MARINE GRADE
ALUMINUM. 30"L, 30"H, 16.25"W (76.2CM L, 76.2CM H,
41.275CM W).
IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: DUCTILE IRON PIPE- CLASS 350
IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40
1401 1402
BFE
VALVE NUMBER
VALVE SIZE
VALVE GPM
VALVE CALLOUT
##
#"
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE
LI1051
LI105
IRRIGATION PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
I
1
0
4
)
IRRIGATION PLAN
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LI801
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
LI801
WILKINS REDUCED PRESSURE
PRINCIPLE 1" BACKFLOW
PREVENTER MODEL 375B
BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE
SEE DETAIL
GALV. THREADED UNION
GALV. NIPPLE LENGTH AS
REQ.
GALV. THREADED
UNION
PVC SLEEVE DIA. SIZE
NEXT SIZE ABOVE
NIPPLE TYP. EACH
NIPPLE
90-DEGREE SCH. 80
ELEC. SWEEP EL.
POWER SUPPLY
QUICK COUPLER. SEE
DETAIL
RAINBIRD EFB-CP BRASS NORMALLY CLOSED CONTROL VALVE CONNECTED TO CONTROLLER MASTER VALVE CIRCUIT
WITH MAXI 2 WIRE INSTALL ENCODERS AND GROUNDING PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS
POWER TO THE MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR SHALL BE BROUGHT FROM THE CONTROLLER AS PER ALL LOCAL
CODES AND REGULATIONS. MAXI 2 WIRE FROM THE FLOW SENSOR SHALL BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE CONTROLLER
WHICH WILL BE USED FOR THE FLOW SENSOR AND MASTER VALVE. ALL COMPONENTS REQUIRED FOR THE COMPLETE
OPERATION OF THE MASTER VALVE AND THE FLOW SENSOR SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURERS
RECOMMENDATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING THE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY UNTIL
CERTIFICATION IS PASSED. MUST BE TESTED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF GOING INTO SERVICE AND TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED
TO WATER PURVEYOR (SLCDPU). SUBMIT CERTIFICATION SHEETS TO OWNER.
INSTALL FLOW SENSOR MIN OF 10 TIMES PIPE SIZE/DIA. UPSTREAM AND 5 TIMES PIPE SIZE/DIA. DOWNSTREAM OF
STRAIGHT UNINTERRUPTED FLOW FROM ANY MAINLINE FITTINGS.
STOP & WASTE VALVE
(LINE SIZE) SEE DETAIL.
MAINLINE AS PER
PLAN. MIN DEPTH 18"
BELL END
TOE
NIPPLEGALV. NIPPLE
LENGTH AS
REQ.
GALV.
FITTINGS TYP
RE
L
I
E
F
V
A
L
V
E
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
M
U
S
T
BE
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
1
2
"
A
B
O
V
E
FI
N
I
S
H
G
R
A
D
E
18" MIN.
BE
L
O
W
F
R
O
S
T
D
E
P
T
H
TY
P
S
T
O
P
&
W
A
S
T
E
DIRECTION OF FLOW
18" MIN.
NOTE:
USE GALV. NIPPLES THROUGHOUT BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY.
TYP. LENGTH AS REQUIRED.
USE RAINBIRD DBRY WIRE CONNECTORS OR APPROVED
EQUAL FOR ALL WIRE CONNECTIONS INSIDE ENCLOSURES.
NOTE:
FLOW SENSOR AND MASTER VALVE SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE CLOSEST SATELLITE
CONTROLLER WHICH CONTROLS THE SUBJECT AREA FOR ALL LOCAL CODES AND REGULATIONS.
CONTRACTOR TO BRING WIRE BACK TO CONTROLLER FROM FLOW SENSOR.
BACKFLOW PREVENTER /MASTER VALVE FOR 3/4" OR 1" MAINLINE
1" = 1'-0"
FINISH GRADE
4"
M
I
N
.
1
1
P-JT-52
1
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LI802
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
LEGEND
1. HINGED BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE; MAINTAIN 6" MIN. CLEARANCE AROUND BACKFLOW.
2. BACKFLOW PREVENTOR. SEE DETAIL: 1/LI120
3. HINGE (TYPICAL). WHEN PLACING CONC. BASE WET INSTALL W/ J BOLTS OR EQUAL.
NO EPOXY
4. 6" CONCRETE SLAB W/ 6" GRAVEL BASE MINIMUM THICKNESS. EXTEND 12' BEYOND
OUTSIDE DIMENSIONS OF ENCLOSURE ALL SIDES.
5. WATER SERVICE INLET PIPING.
6. 1" MINUS GRAVEL 6" LAYER BENEATH CONCRETE 12" LAYER BENEATH BACKFLOW.
7. WATER SERVICE OUTLET PIPING.
8. FINISH GRADE TO BE 4" BELOW TOP OF CONCRETE BASE.
9. BRACKET W/ SLOT FOR EYE BOLT (TYPICAL).
10. PROVIDE PVC SLEEVE NEXT SIZE LARGER THAT WILL FIT OVER NIPPLE.
BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE
NTS
SIDE VIEW
TOP VIEW
P-JT-53
1
LI802
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LI803
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
DRIP VALVE / FILTER/ PRE. REG.
NTS
MAINLINE (SEE PLANS)
1" MIN.
4"
M
I
N
.
12
"
M
A
X
.
4"
M
I
N
.
NOTE:
MAINTAIN 6" MIN. CLEARANCE
BETWEEN VALVES IF (2) VALVES
ARE PLACED IN ONE BOX.
THREADED PVC SCH. 80 RISER
PVC FITTING TURNED ON ITS SIDE WITH AS
THREADED OUTLET SAME SIZE AS THE VALVE.
USE ALL THREADED SCH. 80 FITTINGS UP TO
THE VALVE AS SHOWN.
12" MIN. GRAVEL LAYER
PRESSURE TREATED 4x4 CONT. UNDER
BOX
ACTION BUTRESS #18010 AND 18011
ACTION BUTRESS #18011 AND 180112
NOTCH VALVE BOX TO PROVIDE MIN. 1"
SPACE AROUND PIPE.
PVC LATER LINE AS PER PLAN
FINISH GRADE
RAINBIRD JUMBO VALVE BOX W/
"T" TYPE BOLT DOWN COVER
RAINBIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM
CONTROL ZONE KIT
CONTROL WIRE TO CONTROLLER &
DECODER AT VALVE PER MANUF.
SPEC'S. (SEE PLAN) CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL ONE ADDITIONAL WIRE TO
EACH VALVE FROM CONTROLLER 2'
MIN. EXCESS W/IRE LOOP IN VALVE
BOX. USE KING INNOVATION DRYCONN
BLACK/GRAY WATERPROOF
CONNECTORS.
2
P-SO2-23
NOTES:
1. TWO RWS PER TREE TYP. EQUALLY SPACED
2. INSTALL RAINBIRD 1401 BUBBLER ON SALCO PIPE. PLACE ADJACENT TO
TRUNK (2) PER TREE
3. PLACE RWS ON HIGHEST SIDES OF TREE ROOT BALL PIT IF ON SLOPE
LEGEND:
1. ROOT WATER SYSTEM (RWS) SEE IRRIG. PLAN FOR MODEL NO.
2. FINISH GRADE
3. LATERAL LINE
4. PVC SCH. 80 ELL OR TEE
5. EXISTING SOIL
6. BACKFILL MIX. SEE DETAIL.
7. TREE ROOT BALL
8. RAINBIRD 1401 BUBBLER ON SPX SERIES SWING PIPE TWO PER TREE
ADJACENT TO ROOTBALL PERPENDICULAR TO RWS
ROOT WATER SYSTEM
NTS
12"-18"
6"
6"
MARLEX STREET ELL
SECTION / ELEVATION
PLAN VIEW
1
8
8
4 4 4 4
7
3
6
1
1 8 7
1
2
3
4
56
4
P-SO2-24
1
LI803LI803
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LI804
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
QUICK COUPLER
NTS
RUBBER COVER
FINISH GRADE
10" ROUND RAINBIRD
VALVE BOX WITH BOLT
DOWN "T' TYPE LID
4"
FROM BOTTOM OF LID
TO TOP OF QUICK
COUPLER
(2) #4 BAR 18" LONG
PVC MAINLINE AS PER PLAN
BRASS NIPPLE (LENGTH
AS REQ.'D)
12" MIN. GRAVEL LAYER
UNDER ENTIRE VALVE BOX
LASCO INSERT SWING JOINT
G 13-B-212 WITH GI09-000
STABILIZER ELBOW
FILL BOX WITH CLEAN
3/4" MINUS GRAVEL
RAINBIRD 44RC QUICK
COUPLER VALVE (SET MIN.
2" BELOW BOTTOM OF
VALVE BOX LID)
1
P-SO2-17
STOP & WASTE VALVE
NTS
FINISH GRADE
RAINBIRD 10" PLASTIC VALVE
BOX W/ BOLT DOWN COVER
2" PVC SNUB CAP
2" SCH. 40 PVC SLEEVE
(LENGTH AS REQ'D.).
FEMALE THREAD x SLIP
GRAVEL SETTING BED TO
SECURE SLEEVE
MUELLER MARKII ORISEAL
STOP & WASTE CURB
VALVE FIP THREADED
MAINLINE SIZE
MAINLINE TO BACKFLOW
GRAVEL SUMP - 1 1/2" DRAIN
ROCK, 4 CU. FT. MIN. 12" MIN.
DEPTH DIRECTLY UNDER
VALVE
IRRIGATION MAINLINE AS
PER PLAN
4"
M
I
N
.
2
P-SO2-19
CONTROL VALVE
NTS
MAINLINE (SEE PLANS)
ACTION BUTRESS #18010 AND 18011
12" MIN. 1" MINUS GRAVEL LAYER
1" MIN.
4"
M
I
N
.
12
"
M
A
X
.
ACTION BUTRESS #18011 AND 180112
PIPE BELL END
4"
M
I
N
.
NOTCH VALVE BOX TO PROVIDE MIN. 1"
SPACE AROUND PIPE.
PVC LATER LINE AS PER PLAN
FINISH GRADE
RAINBIRD VALVE BOX W/ "T" TYPE
BOLT DOWN COVER
CONTROL VALVE AS PER PLAN
SOLENOID WIRES
RAINBIRD DBRY DIRECT BURY
SPLICE KIT TYP.
RAINBIRD DECODER
2 WIRE CABLE ALLOW 3' OF EXTRA
CABLE LENGTH LOOPED
(NOT COILED) IN EACH BOX
NOTE:
INSTALL ONE VALVE PER BOX.
FOR SECONDARY WIRE RUN, THE
DISTANCE BETWEEN THE FIELD
DECODER AND THE SOLENOID
(VALVE) CAN NOT EXCEED 450'.
NO DECODER SHALL BE MORE
THAN 500' (OF WIRE PATH) AWAY
FROM GROUNDING GRID.
PRESSURE TREATED 4x4 CONT. UNDER
BOX
SCHEDULE 80 GATE VALVE (SAME
SIZE AS LINE)
SCH. 80 THREADED NIPPLE
PVC FITTING TURNED ON ITS
SIDE WITH A THREADED OUTLET.
SAME SIZE AS THE VALVE. USE ALL
THREADED SCH. 80 FITTINGS UP TO
THE VALVE AS SHOWN
P-SO2-20
3
LI804LI804
LI804
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LI806
IRRIGATION
DETAILS
TWO WIRE PANEL ENCLOSURE
NTS
12"
MIN
CABINET PLAN VIEW
CONCRETE BASE
OWNER
ENCLOSURE
CIRCUIT
BREAKERS
OWNER
SIDE UTIL
I
T
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
12" MIN
12
"
MI
N
IRRIG. SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION NOTES
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY THE FOLLOWING ITEMS
WHICH WILL BE INSTALLED BY THE OWNER, ALL OTHER
ITEMS FOR THE COMPLETE AND OPERATIONAL IRRIGATION
SYSTEM SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE
CONTRACTOR:
1. AG240IC3 SURGE ARRESTOR
2. BLANK BACK PAN FROM ENCLOSURE
3. 5 POSITION BUSS BAR (FOR GROUNDING)
METER SIDE SECTION/ELEV.PANEL
1" MINUS
GRAVEL
4000 PSI
CONCRETE
12"
MIN
METER SOCKET TO CONFORM
WITH LOCAL CODES
UTILITY TEST SECTION
STRONG BOX 240 VOLT MPE SERIES METER
ENCLOSURE MODEL # MPE-A16-22KW/MPE
BASE ORDER WITH BLACK BACK PAN
PANEL NOTES
FURNISH AND INSTALL (1) 2 POLE, 20 AMP. ELECTRICALLY HELD CONTACTOR.
GENERAL NOTES
NEW STRONG BOX PANEL ENCLOSURE MODEL # SB-1852SS W/MPE BASE 240 VOLT AND NEW PANEL ON
ONE SIDE WITH NEW IRRIGATION CONTROLLER, GFI OUTLET, SURGE ARRESTER.
CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ELEC. METER W/ROCKY MT. POWER.
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL LIGHTING CONTROL AND WIRES TO NEW ENCLOSURE IF APPLICABLE.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL GROUNDING GRID FOR IRRITATION CONTROLLER, AS PER
DETAIL AND MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL TIE GROUNDING FROM UTILITY TO GROUNDING FROM IRRIGATION UTILITY TO BE NEC
COMPLIANT.
CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL LONG SWEEP ELLS FOR ALL WIRES, SIZE AS SHOWN.
CONTRACTOR SHALL MOCK UP 120V & 240V WIRING
ORIENTATION OF ENCLOSURE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT.
CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH OWNER TO TEST AND VERIFY PROPER INSTALLATION TO
SPECIFICATIONS FOR GROUNDING REQUIREMENTS OF 10 OHMS OR LESS BEFORE FINAL WALK THOROUGH
BY AUTHORIZED SERVICE PROVIDER.
PANEL "A' VOLTAGE 120/240 VOLTS, I PHASE, 3 WIRE, BLANK BACK PANEL, SURFACE MOUNT,
BOLT ON BREAKER, MAIN 100A ML0 A.I.C 10,000 SERIES RATED 22K
TO IRRG. VALVES
LIGHTING CONTROLS
AG240IC3 SURGE
ARRESTOR
BLANK BACK PAN
2 GANG GFI OUTLET W/
SWITCH DISCONNECT
SINGLE POLE
CONDUIT/WIRE TO
CIRCUT BREAKER
TWO WIRE 14 GAUGE
WIRES TO IRRG. VALVES
COPPER WIRE FOR
GROUNDING GRID
CONDUIT WIRE /
CONDUIT TO
GROUNDING GRID
CONDUIT/WIRE TO
LIGHTS IF APPLICABLE
12"
MIN
2" SWEEP ELL FOR EXIST. ELEC.
WIRES OR FUTURE ELEC. WIRES
4'-0"
SWEEP ELL FOR GROUNDING
WIRES SEE DETAIL
INSTALL (2) SPARE 2" CONDUITS
ONE EACH SIDE
SEE PANEL BELOW
POINT OF SERVICE
12"
MIN
(2) 1/4" DIA. BOLTS W/
WASHERS ONE EACH CORNER
TO BOLT BOXES TOGETHER
METER COORDINATE W/ROCKY
MT. POWER FOR INSTALLATION
CIRCUT BREAKER
1" CONDUIT FROM LOAD
SECTION TO IRRG. CONTROL
SECTION
2" CONDUIT MIN.
36" RADIUS SWEEP
ELL TO POWER
COMPANY
1
P-SO2-28LI806
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
30
0
W
E
S
T
EXISTING BUILDING
100 SOUTH
552
553
551
554
555
LP101
PLANTING PLAN
1
LP101
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
2
)
EXISTING
GARDEN
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
551
552
553
554
555
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP102
PLANTING PLAN
1
LP102
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
1
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
3
)
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
100 SOUTH
551
550552
553
554
555
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP1031
LP103
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
2
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
4
)
PLANTING PLAN
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
100 SOUTH
EXISTING BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING
550550
551
552
553
554
555
551
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP1041
LP104
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
3
)
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
5
)
PLANTING PLAN
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
20
0
W
E
S
T
100 SOUTH
550 552
553
554
555
551
CODE DESCRIPTION
PRESERVE AND PROTECT EXISTING TREE
TREES; 3" CALIPER
SHRUB; 5 GAL. CONTAINER
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING; 1 GAL.
CONTAINER
STRUCTURAL SOIL MIX
SOILS CELL; SEE DETAIL: 1/LS806
550
551
552
553
554
555
REFERENCE NOTES SCHEDULE
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
TREES
PK PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN' / KWANZAN JAPANESE
FLOWERING CHERRY 3" CAL.
SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE
SHRUB AREAS
AH ANEMONE X HYBRIDA 'HONORINE JOBERT' / HONORINE
JOBERT JAPANESE ANEMONE 1 GAL
BT BERBERIS THUNBERGII / JAPANESE GREENLEAF BARBERRY 2 GAL
EJ EUONYMUS JAPONICUS / JAPANESE EUONYMUS 2 GAL
HM HAKONECHLOA MACRA / JAPANESE FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
HA HAKONECHLOA MACRA 'AUREOLA' / GOLDEN VARIEGATED
FOREST GRASS 1 GAL
IJ IRIS ENSATA / JAPANESE WATER IRIS 2 GAL
JJ JASMINUM OFFICINALE / POET'S JASMINE 1 GAL
JM JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS PROCUMBENS 'GREEN MOUND' /
GREEN MOUND JUNIPER 2 GAL
KJ KERRIA JAPONICA / JAPANESE KERRIA 1 GAL
LG LIRIOPE GRAMINIFOLIA / LILYTURF 1 GAL
PT PACHYSANDRA TERMINALIS / JAPANESE PACHYSANDRA 1 GAL
PC PHLOX STOLONIFERA / CREEPING PHLOX 1 GAL
PJ PIERIS JAPONICA / JAPANESE PIERIS 2 GAL
TC TAXUS CUSPIDATA / JAPANESE YEW 2 GAL
TS THYMUS SERPYLLUM / CREEPING THYME 1 GAL
VC VINCA MINOR / COMMON PERIWINKLE 1 GAL
WF WISTERIA FLORIBUNDA / JAPANESE WISTERIA 2 GAL
PLANT SCHEDULE
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP1051
LP105
PLANTING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=20'
MA
T
C
H
L
I
N
E
(
S
E
E
S
H
E
E
T
L
P
1
0
4
)
PLANTING PLAN
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'60'
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP801
PLANTING NOTES
PLANTING NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE A MINIMUM
OF 24 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION COMMENCES. ANY DISCREPANCIES
BETWEEN THE PLAN AND FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY FOR DECISION.
2. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE TO THE PLANT MATERIAL LIST WITHOUT
WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALL
UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIALS IN THE QUANTITIES
AND SIZES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL
DRAWINGS.
5. COMPLETE ROUGH GRADING BEFORE PLANTING OPERATIONS BEGIN.
6. ALL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED 5' MINIMUM AWAY FROM WATER, SEWER AND
STORM DRAIN LINES, WITH A ROOT BARRIER.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINE GRADING ALL PLANTED
AREAS.
8. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCARIFY
ROOTBALL VERTICALLY IN TWO LOCATIONS.
9. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24
HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL THEN BE WATERED AS
NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY ESTABLISHMENT.
10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE COVERED BY A HARD SURFACE OR
VEGETATION.
11. LANDSCAPING SHALL RECEIVE A FULL AND COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM PER
PLANS AND COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS. IRRIGATION SHALL HAVE
AN ELECTRONIC CONTROLLER, ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES
INSTALLED IN PLASTIC VALVE BOXES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO LEAKS
AFTER A 24 HOUR PRESSURE TEST.
12. ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE FULL AND DENSE AND FREE FROM INSECT
AND DISEASE INFESTATION AND SHALL NOT BE ROOTBOUND. INSTALL PER
DETAILS WITH COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER AND WITH PREPARED PLANT PIT
BACKFILL.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION UPON
COMPLETION OF WORK. LOCATIONS FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE
APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AT THE SITE PRIOR TO
PLANTING. ALL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO
THE PLANTING AREAS. PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE RAKED CLEAN OF ALL
DEBRIS, ROCKS, STICKS AND ROOTS GREATER THAN 2" DIAMETER.
14. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY LICENSED LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS.
P-JT-51LP801
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP802
PLANTING
DETAILS
LP802
SHRUB PLANTING
NTS
MULCH
PLANTING
MIX
PREPARED SUB-GRADE
INSTALL SHRUB SO THAT
ROOT FLARE IS AT FINISH
GRADE, DO NOT PLACE
MULCH WITHIN 3" OF
SHRUB TRUNK
FILTER FABRIC
P-JT-03
1
BACK OF WALK OR CURB
EDGING
SETBACK FROM BACK OF CURB,
BACK OF WALK, OR HEADER IS
EQUAL TO 1/2 O.C. SPACING
EQUILATERAL
TRIANGULAR SPACING
PLAN VIEW
SECTION
GROUNDCOVER
MULCH
PLANTING MIX
PREPARED SUB-GRADE
INSTALL GROUNDCOVER SO THAT
ROOT FLARE IS AT FINISH GRADE, DO
NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3" OF
GROUNDCOVER
1/2
1/
2
EQ. SP.
EQ
.
S
P
.
EQ
.
S
P
.
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING
NTS
FILTER FABRIC
2
P-JT-11LP802
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP803
PLANTING
DETAILS
LP803
12
4
3
5
16
7 8
2
9
1011
TREE PIT
OPENING
DETAIL
PAVEMENT
AND EDGE
DETAIL
TREE SOIL CELL
1" = 5'
KEYNOTES:
1. SOIL CELL (24" DEPTH)
2. ROOT & MOISTURE BARRIER
(12" DEPTH)
3. RIBBED ROOT BARRIER
(12" DEPTH)
4. TREE / ROOTBALL
5. GEOCOMPOSITE
FABRIC/GRID
6. STRUCTURAL SOIL
7. CONCRETE PAVING, REF.
CIVIL
8. AGGREGATE BASE
9. COMPACTED BACKFILL
MATERIAL
10. AGGREGATE SUB-BASE
11. COMPACTED SUBGRADE
12. TREE GRATE,
SEE DETAIL: 2/LS815
RE
F
.
C
I
V
I
L
2'
-
2
5
/
8
"
4"
PAVEMENT
AND EDGE
DETAIL
1
P-JT-65LP803
TREE PLANTING WITH STAKES
NTS
PREPARED SUB-GRADE
3X ROOTBALL
MULCH
PLANTING
MIX
CONSTRUCT WATERING
RING AROUND EDGE OF
PLANTING PIT 2"-3" DEEP
INSTALL TREE SO THAT ROOT
FLARE IS AT FINISH GRADE,
DO NOT PLACE MULCH WITHIN
3" OF TREE TRUNK
NOTE: EXCAVATE TREE
PITS 3X DIAMETER OF
ROOTBALL
P-JT-05
2
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
09/26/2025
LP804
PLANTING
DETAILS
LP804
TREE PROTECTION
NTS
6'
-
0
"
EXISTING TREE
TREE CANOPY
CONSTRUCTION FENCE STAKED
AT 4'-0" O.C. LOCATE 2/3
DISTANCE OF CANOPY DROP LINE
AND IN A COMPLETE CIRCLE
AROUND TREE
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
1. TREES CALLED OUT FOR PRESERVATION SHALL BE FENCED AT THE DRIPLINE. FENCING
MAY OCCUR AT THE COMBINED DRIPLINES OF TREES TO BE PRESERVED.
2. FENCING SHALL BE 6-FOOT TALL CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH STEEL POSTS IMBEDDED IN
THE GROUND.
3. NO GRADING SHALL OCCUR WITHINTHE DRIPLINES/FENCED AREA OF EXISTING TREES.
4. NO CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS OR CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MAY BE STORED WITHIN
THE DRIPLINES/FENCING AREAS OF EXISTING TREES.
5. CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR MACHINERY MAY NOT PASS BETWEEN TWO OR MORE
EXISTING TREES IDENTIFIED FOR PRESERVATION IF THEIR CANOPIES ARE WITHIN 10
FEET OF TOUCHING.
6. TREE PRESERVATION MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE CONSTRUCTION,
DEMOLITION AND /OR GRADING ACTIVITIES COMMENCE.
7. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO HAVE AN ARBORIST CERTIFIED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE (ISA) ON SITE, IF SITE CONSTRUCTION
EFFORTS REQUIRE REMOVAL OF EXISTING ROOTS OR BRANCH PRUNING. A CERTIFIED
ARBORIST SHALL BE ON SITE AND MONITOR ALL ROOT PRUNING AND BRANCH PRUNING
OF EXISTING TREES.
8. UNAUTHORIZED TREE REMOVAL IS SUBJECT TO IN-KIND REPLACEMENT EQUAL TO THE
MATURE RESOURCE LOST
9. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO WATER, FERTILIZE AND ATTEND TO OTHER
MAINTENANCE NEEDS OF EXISTING TREES AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY GROWTH
THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. SIX FEET DIAMETER, MINIMUM, BY SIX-INCH
TALL EARTH BERMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT THE BASE OF EACH TREE TO FUNCTION
AS TEMPORARY WATERING BASINS DURING THE CONSTRUCITON PERIOD. TREES SHALL
BE WATERED ACCORDING TO WEATHER AND TREE REQUIREMENTS.
P-JT-61
1
'
M
T
PC
S2S1
1
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
S2
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
S2 S2S2
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
1
09/26/2025
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
1
09/26/2025
M
T
S2
S2
PC
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
1
09/26/2025
S2
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
1 STREELIGHT
3 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
2 PEDESTRIAN LIGHT
TYPE LS TYPE LP
LI
G
H
T
P
O
L
E
LIGHT POLE
JA
P
A
N
T
O
W
N
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
ES
T
.
1
9
0
7
JA
P
A
N
T
O
W
N
SA
L
T
L
A
K
E
C
I
T
Y
ES
T
.
1
9
0
7
BANNER ARM
BANNER ARM
DOUBLE SIDED POLYESTER FABRICBANNER. FULL COLOR PRINTED.
FOUR (4) VARIATIONS, DISTRIBUTEDEVENLY. TWO(2) BANNERS PERVEHICULAR LIGHT POLE.
SEE ELECTRICAL SHEET FORLOCATIONS AND QUANTITY.
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SERVICES
IC T Y
S
A
LT LA
K
E
3
6
9
12
09/26/2025
EXHIBIT D: JAPANTOWN CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 9/25/2025
94,073 SITE SF
CSI/TAG #DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL
02 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.53$ 332,283$
03 CONCRETE $ - -$
04 MASONRY $ - -$
05 METALS $ - -$
06 WOODS & PLASTICS $ - -$
07 THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION $ - -$
08 DOORS & WINDOWS $ - -$
09 FINISHES $ - -$
10 SPECIALTIES $ - -$
11 EQUIPMENT $ - -$
12 FURNISHINGS $ - -$
14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS $ - -$
21 FIRE SUPPRESSION $ - -$
22 PLUMBING $ - -$
23 HVAC $ - -$
26 ELECTRICAL 9.43$ 886,750$
27 COMMUNICATION $ - -$
28 ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY $ - -$
31 EARTHWORK 8.57$ 805,951$
32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS 52.08$ 4,899,265$
33 SITE UTILITIES 18.57$ 1,746,930$
SUBTOTAL 92.18$ 8,671,179$
GENERAL CONDITIONS 10%9.22$ 867,118$
BONDS & INSURANCE 2%1.84$ 173,424$
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 5%4.61$ 433,559$
DESIGN CONTINGENCY 10%9.22$ 867,118$
TOTALS 117.06$ 11,012,397$
ALTERNATE - ADD WOOD PANEL TO BOLLARDS ($750/EA)71,438$
BUILDING COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT NAME……...…..JAPANTOWN STREETSCAPE
LOCATION…………......…..SALT LAKE CITY, UT
ARCHITECT……...……...…GSBS
STAGE OF DESIGN.………40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
UNIT QTY
Page 1
PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 9/25/2025
94,073 SITE SF
CSI/TAG #DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL
PROJECT NAME……...…..JAPANTOWN STREETSCAPE
LOCATION…………......…..SALT LAKE CITY, UT
ARCHITECT……...……...…GSBS
STAGE OF DESIGN.………40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
UNIT QTY
200 Existing Site Hardscape Demolition 94, 073 SF 3.00$ 282,219$
219 Sawcut Asphalt 319 LF 6.00$ 1,914$
225 Adjust Utility Structures to Grade 20 EA 950.00$ 19,000$
550 Protect Existing Tree, Tree Fence 10 EA 1,500.00$ 15,000$
550 Temporary Tree Watering 8 MO 800.00$ 6,400$
406 Remove SD Inlet 2 EA 500.00$ 1,000$
601 Remove & Salvage Light Pole 9 EA 750.00$ 6,750$
TOTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS 332,283$
26 ELECTRICAL
Service & Distribution
615 Bury Existing Power Lines - Electrical Ductbank 450 LF 400.00$ 180,000$
615 Connect to Power 1 LS 3,500.00$ 3,500$
615 Electrical Meter Enclosure 1 EA 6,500.00$ 6,500$
604 Power/Pull Box 7 EA 3,500.00$ 24,500$
603 Main Feeder Conduit - 3" Bored 190 LF 300.00$ 57,000$
Subtotal Service & Distribution 271,500$
612 Power Pedestal w/ Locking Cover - 20A 2 0 EA 1,450.00$ 29,000$
613 Special Outlet w/ Locking Cover - 60A 2 EA 1,950.00$ 3,900$
614 EV Charger 2 EA 12,500.00$ 25,000$
602 Conduit & Circuitry - 2" 1, 500 LF 40.00$ 60,000$
Subtotal Site Power 117,900$
Site Lighting
606 Custom Pedestrian Light Pole 22 EA 10,500.00$ 231,000$
606 Custom Pedestrian Light Pole - Extra Stock 2 EA 8,500.00$ 17,000$
607 Custom Street Light Pole 8 EA 19,000.00$ 152,000$
607 Custom Street Light Pole - Extra Stock 2 EA 16,500.00$ 33,000$
608 Floodlight 2 EA 650.00$ 1,300$
606,607 Photocell 1 EA 450.00$ 450$
606,607 Conduit & Circuitry - 2" 1, 800 LF 32.00$ 57,600$
606,607 Lighting Controls 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000$
Subtotal Site Lighting 497,350$
TOTAL ELECTRICAL 886,750$
31 EARTHWORK
200 Site Excavation & Haul Off - 8" 2, 334 CY 45.00$ 105,030$
200 Site Grading 94, 073 SF 2.00$ 188,146$
200 8" Base Course (Whole Site) 3, 735 Ton 65.00$ 242,775$
200 Traffic Control 6 Months 40,000.00$ 240,000$
200 SWPPP 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
TOTAL EARTHWORK 805,951$
32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
201 Curb & Gutter 170 LF 40.00$ 6,800$
221 Curb & Gutter Transition to Zero 71 LF 40.00$ 2,840$
Page 2
PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 9/25/2025
94,073 SITE SF
CSI/TAG #DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL
PROJECT NAME……...…..JAPANTOWN STREETSCAPE
LOCATION…………......…..SALT LAKE CITY, UT
ARCHITECT……...……...…GSBS
STAGE OF DESIGN.………40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
UNIT QTY
202,506 Waterway 2471 SF 18.00$ 44,478$
203 Decorative 8" Concrete Paving 5950 SF 16.00$ 95,200$
204,501 8" Concrete Paving 41321 SF 14.28$ 590,064$
205 Sidewalk - 8"7786 SF 14.28$ 111,184$
206,502 Decorative Sidewalk - 6"21832 SF 13.00$ 283,816$
502 Spring Concrete Stamping Add 3042 SF 5.00$ 15,210$
502 Summer Concrete Stamping Add 4237 SF 5.00$ 21,185$
502 Autumn Concrete Stamping Add 1420 SF 5.00$ 7,100$
502 Winter Concrete Stamping Add 1597 SF 5.00$ 7,985$
504 Concrete Exposed Aggregate Band 2300 SF 50.00$ 115,000$
223 ADA Ramp Paving 231 SF 18.00$ 4,158$
208,503 Brick Pavers - City Standard 12207 SF 80.00$ 976,560$
220 Asphalt Patch 1884 SF 4.00$ 7,536$
207,505 ADA Truncated Dome Pavers 720 SF 85.00$ 61,200$
222 Concrete Curb Wall 85 LF 40.00$ 3,400$
218,521 18" Concrete Seat Wall 619 LF 500.00$ 309,500$
217 Diagonal Striping 697 SF 3.00$ 2,091$
216 Solid Striping 1053 LF 1.00$ 1,053$
551 Tree 62 EA 650.00$ 40,300$
552,553 Shrub Beds 9636 SF 9.00$ 86,724$
556 Topsoil 714 CY 75.00$ 53,550$
557 Shrub Irrigation System 9636 SF 5.00$ 48,180$
557 Tree Irrigation 62 EA 1,500.00$ 93,000$
557 Backflow Preventer w/ Enclosure 1 LS 8,500.00$ 8,500$
557 Spinkler Controller 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000$
557 Connect to Existing Irrigation 1 LS 4,500.00$ 4,500$
554 Silva Cells, Fabric Wrap 11284 SF 50.00$ 564,200$
555 Silva Cell Structural Soil 836 CY 125.00$ 104,500$
212,518 Precast Concrete Wheel Stop 43 EA 225.00$ 9,675$
213,522 Custom Steel Bollard 77 EA 3,650.00$ 281,050$
213,523 Custom Removable Bollard 7 EA 7,650.00$ 53,550$
516 Custom Crosswalk Stenciling 5572 SF 8.00$ 44,576$
510 Custom Entry Obelisk - 18', LED Lighting 2 EA 50,000.00$ 100,000$
528 Custom Manhole Cover 26 EA 1,950.00$ 50,700$
511 Custom Tree Grate 44 EA 3,350.00$ 147,400$
531 Curved Wood Bench - 16'10 EA 5,500.00$ 55,000$
529 Stone Block/Wood Bench - 8'6 EA 7,500.00$ 45,000$
530 Stone Block/Wood Bench w/ Back - 8'4 EA 8,500.00$ 34,000$
524 Bronze Plaque - 3'X1.5' Embed in Concrete 19 EA 2,500.00$ 47,500$
525 4" Bronze Stripe Etched - Embed in Concrete Paving 688 LF 250.00$ 172,000$
517 Bronze Medallion - Embed in Concrete Paving 86 EA 450.00$ 38,700$
512 Bike Rack 10 EA 1,250.00$ 12,500$
509 Eras Display Freestanding Sign 6 EA 8,500.00$ 51,000$
507 Map Display Structure 2 EA 9,500.00$ 19,000$
508 Seasons Freestanding Display 4 EA 8,500.00$ 34,000$
607 Street Light Banner 64 EA 450.00$ 28,800$
TOTAL EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENT 4,899,265$
33 SITE UTILITIES
400 Catch Basin 5 EA 3,250.00$ 16,250$
Page 3
PROJECT ESTIMATE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL CORPORATION 9/25/2025
94,073 SITE SF
CSI/TAG #DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL
PROJECT NAME……...…..JAPANTOWN STREETSCAPE
LOCATION…………......…..SALT LAKE CITY, UT
ARCHITECT……...……...…GSBS
STAGE OF DESIGN.………40% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
UNIT QTY
401 SD Line 916 LF 80.00$ 73,280$
402 Relocate Water Line - 8"800 LF 1,100.00$ 880,000$
407 Water Valve 2 EA 3,650.00$ 7,300$
403 Replace, Relocate Fire Hydrant 2 EA 6,500.00$ 13,000$
408 Water Tee 1 EA 1,650.00$ 1,650$
405 Sewer Line 23 LF 100.00$ 2,300$
404 Remove, Replace Manhole 2 EA 7,850.00$ 15,700$
410 12" to 8" Reducer 1 EA 1,450.00$ 1,450$
403 Relocate Fiber Optic Line 800 LF 120.00$ 96,000$
403 Relocate Underground Power 1600 LF 400.00$ 640,000$
TOTAL SITE UTILITIES 1,746,930$
Page 4
This page has intentionally been left blank
UPDATES TO THE BOARD OF DirEctors
November 2025
Housing Development Loan Program (HDLP) NOFA
The CRA released the annual competitive Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
for the Housing Development Loan Program on October 21, 2025. Over $8 million
is available as gap financing for affordable housing developments within Salt
Lake City. For developments to qualify, at least 10% of the units must target
either deeply affordable units, defined as 30% of the AMI, or affordable
family-sized housing units, defined as units with 3 or more bedrooms for those
earning 60% or less of the AMI.
UP
D
A
T
E
S
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
Residential Wealth Building NOFA
The CRA released the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Residential Wealth
Building Pilot Program at the same time as the HDLP NOFA. Over $6 million is available to fund
developments that help low-to-moderate-income individuals and families access affordable
housing and wealth-building opportunities, such as homeownership and shared equity
models, which improve their long-term financial stability.
The deadline for applications for both NOFAs is December 4, 2025.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Ribbon Cutting Announcement: Citizens West 2 & 3
The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency is pleased to announce the ribbon-cutting on December 2nd for Citizens West 2 & 3, a new
mixed-use development located at approximately 509 W 300 N.
Citizens West 2 & 3 delivers 80 new affordable units along with ground-floor commercial space, further expanding housing options and
neighborhood amenities on Salt Lake City’s west side. The project is constructed as a seven-story residential building featuring a diverse mix
of unit types—including larger family-oriented units—with the following breakdown:
45 studios
25 three-bedroom units
10 four-bedroom units
64 of the apartments are reserved for households earning 45% to 50% of the area median income, with 16 units dedicated specifically to
households earning between 25% to 39% AMI.
The project received a $3,050,000 loan through the CRA’s FY2022-2023 competitive Housing Development Loan Program. Additionally, as part
of the loan approval, the developer committed to investing at least 1.5% of the loan amount ($45,750) in on-site, publicly visible artwork.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency
Ribbon cutting announcment: The Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah (PHF)
Celebrated ribbon cutting of 515 Tower (515 East 100 South) on October 30:
A 96-unit adaptive re-use affordable housing development with a tenant wealth-building initiative, consisting of studios to 4-
bedroom units, for households earning 25-50% of the area median income (AMI).
The tower also includes a Montessori school and office space.
The City, by way of the CRA, provided $10M in ARPA funds to the Perpetual Housing Fund of Utah (PHF) for the acquisition of floors within the
tower in exchange for PHF developing affordable housing with a profit-sharing tenant wealth-building initiative.
The CRA also provided a $2.65M High Opportunity Area affordable housing loan.
As part of the $10M contribution:
PHF has committed to developing an additional 1,000 affordable units under this tenant wealth-building model over the next 20 years
The CRA is anticipated to receive 2-6% return on the $10M
With the completion of this tower, PHF can revolve the $10M towards additional projects. PHF has a couple of projects on the horizon
that anticipate the creation of 700 additional tenant wealth-building units.
We will schedule a time for PHF to provide a briefing at future Board meeting
UP
D
A
T
E
S
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
THANK YOU
For questions contact department
SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL
To:
Community Reinvestment Agency Chair
Salt Lake City Council Chair
Submission Date:
10/31/2025
Date Sent to Council:
11/04/2025
From:
Department *
Community Reinvestment Agency
Employee Name:
Stine, Robyn
E-mail
robyn.stine@slc.gov
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signature
Mayor's Office Chief of Staff Signature
Community Reinvestment Agency
Director Signed Date
10/31/2025
Chief of Staff's Signed Date
11/04/2025
Subject:
CRA Semi-Annual Property Inventory
Additional Staff Contact:
Jim Sirrine jim.sirrine@slc.gov
Presenters/Staff Table
Document Type
Information Item
Budget Impact?
Yes
No
Recommendation:
N/A
Background/Discussion
N/A
Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*
Yes
No
Public Process
This page has intentionally been left blank
SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 115 WWW.SLC.GOV · WWW.CRA.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5518 TEL 801-535-7240 · FAX 801-535-7245
MAYOR RIN ENDENHALL
Executive Director
DANNY ALZ
Director
STAFF MEMO
DATE: October 31, 2025
PREPARED BY: Jim Sirrine, CRA Property Manager
RE: CRA Semi-Annual Property Inventory
REQUESTED ACTION: None. Written Briefing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: As stated in the Salt Lake Community Reinvestment Agency’s (“CRA’s”)
Land Disposition Policy, CRA staff provides the Board, not less than semi-annually per fiscal year, with
an inventory of all Tier 1 and Tier 2 properties.
ANALYSIS & ISSUES: The attached report contains a current inventory of all CRA-owned properties.
The report includes the description, address, parcel ID, size, zoning, and tier category of each property.
In addition, the report details the approximate acquisition date, current category of disposition, interim
use, and proposed permanent use for each property.
This report includes the addition of former right-of-way parcels along 300 South and updated names and
parcel groupings in the Depot District to match the Rio Grande development plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
•November 2025 CRA Property Inventory
Semi-Annual Property Report | November 2025
Description Assessor Address Parcel ID Zoning Tier Acquired Use Status Proposed Reuse
1 Commissary Kitchen Former gas station property 877 W. 400 S.15-02-406-001-0000 0.32 0.32 R-MU-35 T-2 2021 Use Study Leased to Taqueria El Angel To be determined
2 Indiana Avenue Vacant land (former city owned property)1410 W. Indiana Ave.15-10-236-018-0000 0.57 0.57 CN T-2 2024 Use Study To be determined To be determined
TOTAL # of Project Properties: 3 # of Acres:1.84 # of Parcels:5
BLOCK 70
Eccles Theater, retail spaces, and plaza 16-06-105-064-0000 1.7
Alley to Priority Dispatch and 111 16-06-105-065-0000 0.01
Midblock walkway connecting Main St. to Regent St. and
access to the Eccles Theater 147 S. Main St.16-06-105-009-0000 0.08
167 S. Regent St.16-06-151-003-0000 0.03
167 S. Regent St.16-06-151-018-0000 0.04
TOTAL # of Project Properties: 2 # of Acres: 1.92 # of Parcels: 6
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
6 Broadway Center (Parking Garage)Parking structure with retail spaces 251 S. Floral St.16-06-154-048-0000 0.66 0.66 D-1 T-2 1989 Permanent Use N/A
Parking Structure under Gallivan Plaza 49 E. Gallivan Ave.16-06-152-077-6001 3.49 Leased to Boyer-Block 57
Associates LTD
TOTAL # of Project Properties: 4 # of Acres: 28.65 # of Parcels: 13
DEPOT DISTRICT
10 Rio Grande Hotel, Block 62 Home Inn - Single room occupancy housing units 428 W. 300 S.15-01-179-012-0000 0.3 0.3 D-3 T-2 2009 Permanent Use N/A
Warehouse buildings(formerly SDI)502 W. 300 S.15-01-152-021-0000 1.65
Paved parking lot area (formally Beehive Brick parking )250 S. 500 W.15-01-152-025-0000 0.56
Rio Grande District Block A and E 300 S. north frontage 542 W 300 S 15-01-151-021-0000 0.36 GMU N/A
Depot continued on page 2
2010 Use Study
Leased to USA Climbing, SLC
"A Place For Your Stuff," Fill the
Pot, and parking for Mac. Flats To be determinedD-3 T-1
To be determined3Northeast Assemblage 0.95 2024T-2 Use Study To be determined
Project Area/Property
Parking stalls leased to the State
of UtahT-2 1991
Acres/Total
7.92
0.13 D-1 T-1
N/ALower two levels (250 stalls) of an underground parking
structure
Land leased to Jazz Arena
Investors, LLC thru 2040 N/A
Permanent Use350 S. 200 E.D-10.02
20.05
2.57
N/A
D-4 T-1 1989 Permanent Use
Retail Retail spaces
1984-1991 Permanent Use
Gallivan Center - plaza, event center, and amphitheater Event spaces, plaza, and
walkway239 S. Main St.
228 S. State St.
301 W. S. Temple
365 W. S. Temple
D-1 T-1
2013 Active Disposition development
Entered into a Purchase Agreement with C. W.
Urban
131 S. Main St.
1.79 D-1 T-1 2003-2014 Permanent Use
Theater events in partnership
with County Center for the Arts
and leased retail
N/A4
Regent Street at 200 South
Eccles Theater and Ancillary Spaces
5
7 Gallivan Center Plaza, Parking, and Retail (Block 57)
Land - Arena (Block 79)8
Metro Condos Parking (Block 53)9
Rio Grande District Block A11
CRA-Owned Properties - Page 1 of 4
Semi-Annual Property Report | November 2025
Description Assessor Address Parcel ID Zoning Tier Acquired Use Status Proposed ReuseProject Area/Property Acres/Total
Depot continued from page 1
Vacant building (formally Serta mattress factory)15-01-302-018-0000 0.6 D-3
Warehouse building (former State art storage)310 S 500 W 15-01-153-009-0000 0.59 D-3
Rio Grande District Block B and F 300 S. south frontage 543 W 300 S 15-01-153-013-0000 0.36
540 W. 400 S.15-01-302-017-0000 0.93
346 S. 500 W.15-01-302-021-0000 0.32
Vacant warehouse (blue)336 S. 500 W.15-01-302-022-0000 1.25 N/A
Rio Grande District Block D and E Vacant land (former Intermountain Furniture)243-255 S. 600 W.15-01-151-009-0000 0.5 2008
16 Sun Bar (Block 47)Vacant land 702 W. 200 S.15-02-234-015-0000 0.31 0.31 GMU T-2 2003 Use Study N/A To be determined
Howa Storage Bays 648 W. 100 S.15-01-103-022-0000 0.5 storage units - multiple tenants
TOTAL # of Project Properties: 9 # of Acres:16.07 # of Parcels:48
development
development
N/A
Leased to USA Climbing
N/A
To be determined
To be determined
To be determined
2002 Active Disposition
N/A
USA Climbing
N/AVacant land (formally owned by State of Utah)
Vacant land
Vacant land
535 W. 300 S.
336 S. 500 W.
Vacant land
GMU
T-1
Included as part of the Salt Lake Central
Station area planGMUT-1 Use Study
N/A2022
2008
GMU Use Study Leased to Utah Art Alliance
17
2.5
2.54
1
1.78
2.33
2.7412
13
14
15 Use Study
Use Study
Use Study2002
2008
2008GMU
T-1D-3
GMU
D-3
T-1
T-1
Rio Grande District Block B
Rio Grande District Block C
Rio Grande District Block D
Rio Grande District Block E Vacant Land (West part of BLK 63)
Central Station (North)
18 Central Station (South)Included as part of the Salt Lake Central
Station area planT-2 2008
CRA-Owned Properties - Page 2 of 4
Semi-Annual Property Report | November 2025
Description Assessor Address Parcel ID Zoning Tier Acquired Use Status Proposed ReuseProject Area/Property Acres/Total
NORTH TEMPLE
19 East Folsom Trail Property Vacant building (former Schovaers Electronics)22 S JEREMY ST 15-02-204-007-0000 0.34 0.34 TSA-UN T-2 2023 Use Study Environmental Remediation To be determined
Office building with large training room 961-965 W. Folsom Ave 15-02-020-03-0000 0.15 CG
Warehouse space and small office building 47 S. 1000 W.15-02-202-001-0000 0.19 TSA-UN
Warehouse space and small restaurant 51 S. 1000 W.15-02-202-002-0000 0.19 TSA-UN
TOTAL # of Project Properties: 2 # of Acres:0.87 # of Parcels:4
STATE STREET
Single family home used as a business 15-12-259-008-0000 0.17 D2 T-2
TOTAL # of Project Properties:2 # of Acres:1.21 # of Parcels:6
SUGAR HOUSE
23 Street Car Traction Power Substation Site S-Line Facility 1015 E. Sugarmont Dr. 16-20-205-021-0000 0.06 0.06 R-1-5000 T-2 2012 Permanent Use S-Line Facility N/A
24 S-Line Greenway S-Line/Parley's Trail Greenway 2211 S. 900 E 16-20-135-021-0000 0.04 0.04 FB-SE T-2 2013 Permanent Use S-Line/Parley's Trail Greenway N/A
TOTAL # of Project Properties:3 # of Acres:1.71 # of Parcels:7
WEST CAPITOL HILL
26 Marmalade Development Marmalade Lot 1 - Future Park 524 N. 300 W. 08-36-205-044-0000 0.56 0.56 R-MU T-1 2005 Permanent Use City park To be determined
27 524 N. Arctic Ct.Vacant Land 524 N. Arctic Ct.08-36-206-011-0000 0.11 0.11 SR-1A T-1 2015 Active Disposition N/A To be determined
TOTAL # of Project Properties:2 # of Acres:0.67 # of Parcels:2
Affordable residential mixed-use and S-Line
extension25Sugarmont Plaza Use Study2021T-2PL1.61 CRA Storage
Folsom Ave. Complex (Formerly Whipple Plumbing)0.53 2024 To be determinedUse Study To be determinedT-220
22 Major Street Vacant Lots 0.96 T-2 Use Study To be determined
937 S. 200 W.
Vacant Lot
Use Study To be determined
To be determined
To be determined937 S. 200 W.0.25 2025
2024CC
21
CRA-Owned Properties - Page 3 of 4
Semi-Annual Property Report | November 2025
Description Assessor Address Parcel ID Zoning Tier Acquired Use Status Proposed ReuseProject Area/Property Acres/Total
15-12-206-013-6000 0.1
15-12-206-013-2000 0.1
Vacant land (formally A&E Generator, N. yard)252 W. Montrose Ave.15-12-206-015-6000 0.09
Vacant land 254 W. Montrose Ave.15-12-206-017-0000 0.1
Vacant land and storage building (formally DeVroom)753 S. 300 W.15-12-207-001-0000 0.34
TOTAL # of Project Properties:1 # of Acres:2.16 # of Parcels:11
COMBINED TOTALS # of Project Properties:28 # of Acres:55.10 # of Parcels:102
FBUN-2 T-1*2008 Use Study
Leased shop and storage to
Bulldog Sheetmetal Fabrication
W. Montrose Ave.
NA
28
745 S. 300 W.
Vacant land
2.16
Vacant shop and apartment (formally T&G Upholstery)
Building (Bulldog Sheet Metal)244-246 W. Montrose Ave.
Affordable residential mixed-use
*T-1 Pending decision on title issues. Attorneys may
determine the acreage is less than 2 acres.
CRA-Owned Properties - Page 4 of 4
This page has intentionally been left blank