Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/18/2025 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING   November 18, 2025 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings.  Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chris Wharton, Chair District 3 Alejandro Puy, Vice Chair District 2 Victoria Petro District 1 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Darin Mano District 5 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7   Generated: 09:23:33 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Sarah Young will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of September 2, 2025, as well as the formal meeting minutes of June 10, 2025, July 8, 2025, and September 9, 2025. 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing Nov. 12–19 as Transgender Awareness Week and Nov. 20 as Transgender Day of Remembrance in Salt Lake City. 6.The Council will recognize Maria Garciaz for her service as Executive Director of NeighborWorks. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 and B2 will be heard as one public hearing.   1. Grant Application: Innovative Finance and Asset Concession Grant Program The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Transportation Department to the Department of Transportation. If awarded, the grant would fund the Sugar House Station Area into a finance-ready, mixed-use, transit- oriented development (“TOD”) district.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   2. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2024 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational Solicitation Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office). If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of License Plate Reader (LPR) cameras.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   3. Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code related to RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District) to RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District). As part of the proposal a small number of RMF-35 properties would be changed to RMF-45. The proposal aims to remove barriers to new housing developments and facilitate compatible infill within the City’s moderate-density neighborhoods. These proposed updates introduce design standards for new development, reduce minimum lot size requirements, eliminate lot width minimums, permit multiple buildings per lot, and offer a density bonus for preserving existing housing units. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01388. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/RMFZoneUpdates.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   4. Ordinance: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Text Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would adopt the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Code, a state fire code that the City is required to adopt, along with a map that shows where the WUI Fire Code would apply. The proposal would also amend Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code to give precedence to the adopted WUI Code where it conflicts with regulations, with the exception of the Riparian Corridor Overlay. The WUI code regulates certain building materials, construction requirements, building separation, and landscaping provisions to reduce the risk of fire.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for the Youth & Family Division in support of YouthCity afterschool programs, funding for the National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit being held in November in Salt Lake City, funding for the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system, funding for additional Green Bike stations, and grant funding to support victims of violent crimes, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 and Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2. Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment Public Lands (PL) and Street Vacation - West High School The Council will consider adopting the proposed Text Amendment and Street Vacation ordinances at approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School. The proposed changes include: •Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. This would apply to all PL zoning districts. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00320. •Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00321. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/2fdcpe2z.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.)   E.NEW BUSINESS:. NONE.   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Station Area Plan Exception The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would support an exception from Utah Code adopting six Station Area Plans (SAPs). Utah Code requires the City to adopt SAPs for all fixed guideway public transit stations within the City or within a half mile of the City boundary. Utah Code provides exceptions to the SAP requirements when conditions are met. The six stations that the City is required to produce a SAP for, but for various reasons it is impracticable to do so, include the Airport, Stadium, Central Campus, Fort Douglas, University of Utah Medical Center, and River Trail (located in West Valley City, but some portions of the half mile radius is within Salt Lake).    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, October 21, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).     G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Parking Dimensions and Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to parking dimensions and off-street parking standards. The proposal would clarify driveway parking eligibility for single-family, two- family, and townhome-type dwellings, expand tandem parking allowances, and update parking space dimensions to align with current engineering standards. The proposed changes will align the City parking requirements with S.B. 181 and H.B. 368. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.:PLNPCM2025-00358.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2. Ordinance: Water Conservation and Land Use Element-General Plan Amendment to Plan Salt Lake The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would adopt the plan Water Conservation and Land Use Planning. The proposal would formally integrate the City’s land use plans with the City's 2022 Water Master Plan. The proposal would also update the City’s General Plan to comply with Utah State Code 10-9a-403, which mandates the inclusion of a water element in Plan Salt Lake by December 31, 2025. This proposal is citywide. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00481.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3. Resolution: 2025 Water Conservation Plan The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider a resolution that would adopt the 2025 Water Conservation Plan. The updated plan was developed in accordance with the State’s Conservation Plan Act, as well as other State, federal, and industrial guidelines. It includes estimates of water supply and demand, analysis of historical water use, and establishes 5-, 10-, and 40-year water conservation goals. The plan also outlines programs to achieve these goals and details a communications and outreach strategy to support implementation.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 25, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, December 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4. Board Appointment: Library Board – Janice Kimball The Council will consider approving the appointment of Janice Kimball, resident of District 5, to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT) Advisory Board - Thomas Merrill The Council will consider approving the appointment of Thomas Merrill, resident of District 4, to the PNUT Board for a term ending November 18, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   6. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT) Advisory Board - Austin Whitehead The Council will consider approving the appointment of Austin Whitehead, resident of District 5, to the PNUT Board for a term ending November 18, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   7. Board Appointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT) Advisory Board - Christian Chavez The Council will consider approving the appointment of Christian Chavez, resident of District 4, to the PNUT Board for a term ending November 18, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   8. Board Reappointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Laura Lewis The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Laura Lewis, resident of Salt Lake County, to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending November 18, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   9. Board Reappointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails (PNUT) Advisory Board – Meridith Benally The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Meridith Benally, resident of Salt Lake County, to the PNUT Board for a term ending November 18, 2028.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, November 18, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   H.ADJOURNMENT:     CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 14, 2025, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, September 2, 2025. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Brian Fullmer – Constituent Liaison, Policy Analyst, Nick Norris – Planning Director, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Allison Rowland – Public Policy Analyst, Daniel Echeverria – Senior Planner, Tammy Hunsaker – Deputy Director of Community Services, Laura Briefer – Public Utilities Director, Lorena Riffo Jenson – Director of Economic Development, Weston Clark – Mayor's Senior Advisor, Brooke Olson – Principal Planner, Andrew Hulka – Senior Planner, Noah Elmore – Principal Planner, David Stuenzi – Associate Planner, Austin Kimmel – Public Policy Analyst, Lisa Tarufelli – Public Utilities Finance Administrator, Jacob Maxwell – Economic Development Deputy Director The meeting was called to order at 2:06 p.m.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 1 Work Session Items   1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, wildfire mitigation, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Summary: Nick Norris provided an update on the status of the mixed-use (MU) zoning consolidation text and map amendment, including its effective date of October 8, 2025. Nick highlighted that Planning was working with multiple property owners within the 700 West and 900 West corridors to provide verification of existing uses; the Northwest Pipeline re-use project (former Public Safety building) would not be impeded by the zoning consolidation effort, and the Planning-managed open counter land-use application would be updated and ready by the effective date. Weston Clark provided updates on Engineering, Transportation, Public Lands, Sustainability, and Planning Department’s projects; community event highlights; and metered parking updates. Andrew Johnston provided updates on Homeless Resource Center (HRC) utilization (currently all were at capacity), Rapid Intervention Team locations for the week, upcoming Resource Fair (September 12, 2025 at Library Square), Homeless Winter Emergency services, the Transformative Campus, the Mobile Hygiene Pilot program and the Community Corner homeless services program.   2.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment for the Delta Center Parking Garage at Approximately 301 West South Temple ~ 2:30 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would approve a Master Development Agreement for the construction of the Delta Center parking garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. The proposal includes the construction of a seven-story parking garage with approximately 452 parking stalls at the southwest corner   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 2 of the site, which is intended to provide parking for patrons of the Delta Center Arena and improve the site's functionality. The applicant is requesting approval of the development agreement associated with the project, which establishes specific rules for constructing the parking garage at the Delta Center Arena. If approved, the proposed development agreement could supersede several of the City's rules and regulations. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jazz Arena Investors LLC. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/DeltaCenterParking. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025   Summary: Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction. Brooke Olson noted Planning staff’s recommended approval of the proposal with conditions, in-line with the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and provided information regarding the proposal including overview of the development agreement, proposed design and exit drive approach modifications. Bruce Baird (Attorney for Jazz Arena Investors), Jim Olson (President, Utah Jazz), Addie McNamara (Vice President of Strategic Initiatives, Utah Jazz & Utah Mammoth), and Mike Steele (Vice President, CAA ICON) detailed the purpose of the proposal, addressed the recommended conditions, spoke to current construction work at the arena, and discussed the following with Council Members and Planning staff: •Requiring certain development conditions prior to Council vote or during future phases of the development •Applicant request to approve the development agreement with the requirement that the conditions be met before issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the parking garage •Various options for satisfying some of the conditions •Clarifying the applicant’s responses to recommended conditions •Upcoming meetings between Delta Center representatives and City Staff to finalize development agreement prior to Formal Meeting vote on September 9, 2025 •Site limitations for ground level activation and expanded landscape buffer   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 3 3.Ordinance: Partial Street Vacation at Approximately 1101 West 400 South ~ 3:00 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about an ordinance that would close a portion of the public right-of-way on both 1100 West and 400 South adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South. The closure would facilitate the future construction of a new single- family residence on the property. The petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area is approximately five feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Erik Sansom, property owner. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025     Summary: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction. Andrew Hulka provided details of the proposal, including existing conditions of the property and the current request, corner lot street frontage context, and Planning Commission’s recommendation to approve the vacation request for the 1100 West portion and deny the vacation request for the 400 South portion. Council Members and staff discussed land transaction details for transferring the right- of-way property along 1100 West to the property owner. Erik Sansom (Applicant) provided purpose of the request, reasoning for rebuilding vs. remodeling the existing structure, possible solutions to the Planning Commission’s concerns, and points of consideration for allowing the vacation along 400 South. Council Member Young left the meeting during this agenda item.   4.Ordinance: Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Text Amendment ~ 3:20 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to residential buffer prohibitions. The proposal would review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The proposal also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 4 the distance is measured. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025   Summary: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction. Noah Elmore and Daniel Echeverria provided information regarding proposed changes, prohibited and conditional uses, definitions requiring revision, and Planning Commission having forwarded a positive recommendation. Council Members and staff discussed defining the land uses subject to the 1,000-foot buffer from residential zones and the proposal not impacting MU zones. Council Requests: Council Member Dugan requested a graphic that detailed the new MU zones included into the proposed residential buffer zone. Daniel Echeverria said it would be provided.   5.Ordinance: Utility Installation Exemptions Text Amendment ~ 3:40 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to utility installation exemptions. The proposal would clarify the application of utility exemptions and standardize the footnotes in related land use tables. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, October 21, 2025   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 5   Summary: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction. David Stuenzi provided information regarding proposed changes including new exemptions, administrative approval process for new public utility structures (including historic districts), and technical updates (Ordinance Version 1-B). Council Members, Daniel Echeverria, and David Stuenzi discussed administrative reviews for new utility structures, emphasizing the importance of incorporating feedback from affected residents, requirement of public notice for any new public utility structure, and ensuring Historic Landmark Commission standards continued to be applied and considered within the administrative review process. Council Requests: Council Member Wharton requested a small group meeting regarding the proposal to clear up additional questions. Straw Poll: Support for adding language to clarify that exempted government antennas needed to be considered/classified as “critical infrastructure” that “provide utility or public safety services” to the public and language added in footnotes to maintain that antennas were not permitted in the Eco-Industrial Buffer Area overlay. All Council Members present were in favor, with Council Member Young absent for the poll.   6.Tentative Break ~ 4:00 p.m.  20 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Set Public Hearing Date - Hold hearing to accept public comment - TENTATIVE Council Action -   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 6   7.Resolution: Public Utilities Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 2025B and Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2025C ~ 4:20 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of up to $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue bond anticipation notes, Series 2025B, and up $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Public Utilities revenue refunding bond, Series 2025C. The notes will finance the acquisition, construction, remodeling, and improvement of a campus for Public Utilities. The Bonds will be issued for the purpose of refunding in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the currently outstanding Public Utilities Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2017. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 2, 2025     Summary: Austin Kimmel provided a brief introduction. Laura Briefer and Lisa Tarufelli provided an overview of the proposed bonds including how the bonds would be used, the bond anticipation note financing providing necessary funds for property acquisition without the need to raise utility rates, revenue from the recent utility rate increase would not be used for the purchase of a Public Utilities campus or used to pay for bond anticipation notes, and a preliminary official statement along with other materials that included bond terms, outstanding debt, and the department’s financial profile was made available to the Council.   8.Informational: Initial Discussion of Legislative Intents for Fiscal Year 2025-26 ~ 4:40 p.m.  30 min. The Council will hold the first planned briefing on its Legislative Intent statements for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Legislative Intents are formal requests the Council makes of the Administration that are adopted along with the annual budget. This briefing will consist of conversations with the Administration designed to exchange any preliminary information and feedback needed to clarify each Intent. In addition, the Council will review and consider any staff recommendations for closing some previous years’ intents. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 7 Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   Council Member Young re-joined the meeting during this agenda item. Summary: Allison Rowland provided a brief introduction and discussed the following Legislative Intents with Council Members and City staff: Attorney’s Office Legislative Intents •FY26 Court System Budget and Workload Evaluation ◦ Jill Love indicated the Justice Court would follow up with the Council regarding this item •FY24 Department Role Clarity in Ordinance ◦Council Members agreed to focus on Economic Development next for role clarity •FY23 OPMA ◦Council Members agreed to close this item •FY21 Decriminalization Review of City Code ◦Council Members agreed to close and continue this item Community and Neighborhoods Legislative Intents •FY26 Arts Council Funding and Programs ◦Council Members agreed to keep this item open/ongoing Finance Legislative Intents •FY26 Consolidated Fee Schedule ◦Council Members agreed to close this item •FY24 Legal Defenders Association ◦Council Members agreed to keep this item open •FY23 Grants and Ongoing Programs ◦Council Members agreed to close this item Police Department Legislative Intents •FY26 Police Camera/Body-Worn Camera/Drone Privacy ◦Council Members agreed to consolidate this with the FY21 Police Department Reporting ordinance •FY21 Police Department Role ◦Council Members agreed to close this item Public Lands Legislative Intents •FY24 Golf Fee Structure ◦Council Members agreed to close this item MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 8 Public Utilities Legislative Intents •FY23 Water Usage by the City ◦Council Members agreed to move this item to Public Lands •FY25 Jordan River Water Quality ◦Laura Briefer provided additional information regarding the status of the intent, impacts to the Jordan River from those living in encampments near the river, and establishing a working group to recommend actions to address water quality issues. Council Members agreed to update the legislative intent to include convening various partners/stakeholders to discuss action steps and priorities for the Jordan River Council-Led Legislative Intents •FY25 Council Member Compensation ◦Council Members agreed to keep the item open, update the intent’s language, and further discuss forming a sub-committee for the topic •FY21 Police Department Reporting Ordinance ◦Council Members agreed to combine this intent with FY26 Police Camera/Body-Worn Camera/Drone Privacy Public Services Department •FY15 Maintenance of Business Districts ◦Council Staff indicated additional work would be completed for this item and provided to the Council. Lorena Riffo-Jenson spoke to the funding required for enhanced maintenance within the City, interested areas of the City could apply for an Economic Promotion Special Assessment Area (SAA) where no more than 20% could go towards maintenance, and providing grants to community groups interested in starting maintenance programs Council Requests: Council Member Puy, seeking a possible new intent, requested further study on the long- term effects of removing fluoride from the water in Utah and its impacts to underserved communities in the City. Jennifer Bruno said this could be discussed in a Chair/Vice Chair meeting and inquiries could be made to the Administration and Health Department for ways to gather data.   9.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2025- 26 ~ 5:10 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about Budget Amendment No.1 for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes items which relate to the Main Street fire on August 11, 2025, including funding for an emergency loan fund program, rental assistance, and funding for barriers to allow safe pedestrian passage in front of the buildings burned in the recent fire. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 9 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 or Tuesday, October 7, 2025   Summary: Mayor Mendenhall provided an overview of the budget amendment, noted the Administration was seeking the Council’s input on the proposed amendment, and described the re-worked funding mechanisms for this request. Lehua Weaver, Jake Maxwell, and Tammy Hunsaker provided information regarding: •Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) addressing the same topic at its next meeting, including establishing the new Disaster Relief Program and seeking a budget amendment to fund it •Reactivation of the Emergency Loan Program in response to the Main Street fire, including terms of the business loans and the five businesses who experienced direct damage being offered the loans •Barriers/barricades for pedestrian safety on Main Street •Parameters of the proposed Rental Assistance Program – $100,000 from Funding Our Future, Relocation Assistance Fund for Tenants (RAFT) Program Council Members, Lorena Riffo-Jenson, and staff discussed: •Increasing boarded building fees in the Central Business District to a punitive level to encourage closed/boarded building to open/operate •The goal of the Emergency Loan Program being a gap financing tool for the affected businesses and a requirement for the businesses to stay in Salt Lake City •Redefining the scope of funding to incentivize businesses to remain on Main Street •Concerns regarding redirecting funds from RAFT to this current proposal Council Requests: Council Member Young requested further policy discussions to determine the parameters for future emergencies/assistance. Council Member Lopez Chavez wanted assurances the proposal included language that limited the assistance to businesses directly and indirectly by the fire. Council Member Puy requested further policy discussion regarding the Rental Assistance Program, expressing concern that the redirected funding was needed for its original intention to help displaced residents across the City. Straw Poll: Support for Item A-3 public right of way safety (up to $80K from the General Fund). All MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 10 Council Members present were in favor, with Council Member Petro absent for the vote.   10.Board Appointment: Public Utilities Advisory Committee – Sean McKelvie ~ 5:40 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Sean McKelvie, resident of Salt Lake County, prior to considering appointment to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee for a term ending January 15, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 2, 2025     Summary: Interview held. Council Member Wharton said Sean McKelvie’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   11.Board Appointment: Public Utilities Advisory Committee – Kamiron Anderson ~ 5:45 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Kamiron Anderson, resident of District 1, prior to considering appointment to the Public Utilities Advisory Committee for a term ending January 15, 2029. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 2, 2025   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 11   Summary: Interview held. Council Member Wharton said Kamiron Anderson’s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration.   Standing Items   12.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    Item not held.   13.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.    Summary: Jennifer Bruno inquired which Council Members would be interested in serving on a Council-led sub-committee to discuss and establish Council Member compensation policy. Council Members Wharton, Mano, and Petro volunteered for the sub- committee.   14.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual; b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining; c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation; d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 12 possible terms; e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms; (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale; f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Item not held.     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 13 Meeting adjourned at 6:17 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, September 2, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 2, 2025 14 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, July 8, 2025.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative Leadership: Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson –  Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards –  Public Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Kate Werrett – Budget & Policy Analyst  The meeting was called to order at 7:08 pm.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of March 4, 2025, and March 18, 2025. Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the work session meeting minutes of March 4, 2025 and March 18, 2025. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items B1 – B4 will be heard as one public hearing.   1. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2026 Homeless Shelter Cities Mitigation Grant Application The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Department of Workforce Services Homeless Services. If awarded, the grant would continue to fund 19 existing full-time positions (15 Officers, 3 Sergeants, and 1 Lieutenant).    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See Item B4 for Council action.   2. Grant Application: Fiscal Year 2026 Salt Lake County Youth Advocacy Anti- Drug Coalition Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 2 Department of Community and Neighborhoods to the Salt Lake County Health Department. If awarded, the grant would fund anti-drug advocacy projects for the 2025- 26 school year and travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See Item B4 for Council action.   3. Grant Application: Utah State Board of Education Summer Food Service Program Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Community and Neighborhoods-Youth and Family Division to the Utah State Board of Education. If awarded, the grant would fund reimbursement to provide snacks to Youth City participants during the summer of 2025.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See Item B4 for Council action.   4. Grant Application: Utah Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force Affiliate Funding Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Attorney General’s Office – Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force. If awarded, the grant would fund detective overtime, travel, and local training to assist in the efforts to combat internet facilitated offenses against children. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 3 The project period of the award is for 12 months.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a    Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to close the public hearing and refer Items B1 through B4 to a future Consent Agenda. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Sylvia Richards provided a brief introduction to the grant applications.  There were no public comments.   5. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26CIP.     FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025; Tuesday, July 1, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 4 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to close the public hearing and approve the following changes to the CIP budget: • Remove the second tranche of Public Lands GO Bonds from the Key Changes document. • Allow the Administration to use $300,000 for CPTED lighting. • All other funding will be discussed at the briefings as scheduled and approved at the August 19 Council Meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Kate Werrett provided a brief introduction. Public Comments: Rachel Taylor spoke to a CIP application submitted for a potential nature park located on the west side of the Bonneville Golf Course driving range and urged the Council to approve the request.  Jennifer Robison spoke to the CIP application for Rose Park Lane Beautification Trail & Safety Improvements that addressed safety and health concerns along Rose Park Lane and thanked the Mayor for recommending funding for this project.   Peter Corroon spoke to the CIP application for Main & Broadway Shade that would install shade elements, planter boxes, and outdoor seating for the Clift Building and asked the Council to reconsider the request.  Nicholas Wilkinson spoke to the CIP application for Nevada Street Reconstruction that was focused on safety for the east bench and included ADA, crosswalk, signage, and curb updates for Nevada Street.  Matthew Morris spoke in support of the Glendale Traffic Calming CIP request that would address several safety concerns in the neighborhood such as speeding cars, property damage from speeding cars, animal deaths, and dangerous crossings for th MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 5 children. Kelbe Goupil spoke in support of the Glendale Traffic Calming CIP request, and noted that slowing traffic on 800 West was an investment in the safety and welling being of the neighborhood, and asked for the Council’s support for the request. Evan Sugden spoke to a CIP application submitted for secure bike parking (bike spas), noting the Milk Block would soon benefit from sustainable transportation and secure bike parking for a multitude of users, and requested consideration for the project.  Mary Jo Tedesco spoke to a CIP application submitted for traffic calming in the 1200 East/University neighborhood and recognized/commended other CIP requests for traffic calming efforts to ease safety concerns across the entire City.  Kim Paturzo spoke to the CIP application for Safe Side Streets North that supported traffic calming and safety measures for 1000 East and asked the Council to reconsider funding the request.  Jeff Bair spoke to the CIP application for Slow Down Liberty Wells South that supported traffic calming and safety measures at 300, 400, and 600 East between 1700 South and 2100 South and asked the Council to reconsider funding the request.   Tina Hernandez spoke to a CIP application submitted for a HAWK crosswalk signal installation at the intersection of Zenith Avenue and Richmond Street, noting the intersection was dangerous with numerous close calls, and urged the Council to fund the request.   John Woeste spoke to the CIP application for the Texas Street Replacement, noting dangerous conditions of streets on the east side of the city, and asked the Council to fund the request. Tom Merrill spoke to the CIP application for Broadway & Main Shade, noting the proposal would facilitate a more comfortable pedestrian experience for the elderly community and nearby residents, and asked the Council to fund the proposal.  Council Remarks: Council Member Lopez Chavez thanked the public for their participation and for their repeated application for CIP projects within their neighborhoods, noting the Council was working to process and better understand stronger budgeting in the future to overcome the needed work across the city. Council Member Puy spoke to the challenges of funding CIP projects, noting the Administration and Council used a data based approach to prioritize funding projects for neighborhoods most in need, and thanked the public for their continued persistence in CIP requests.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 6 C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Mixed-Use (MU) Zoning Consolidation Zoning Text and Map Amendment The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the City's zoning ordinance and zoning map by consolidating up to 27 existing commercial, form-based, and mixed-use zoning districts into six new mixed-use (MU) districts. The proposal aims to simplify zoning regulations, improve clarity of language, and incorporate missing design standards. The new mixed-use districts will be similar to the current districts but will have changes to setbacks, building height, lot coverage, and permitted land uses. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00707. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCMixedUse.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to Adopt Ordinance 47 of 2025, approving the Mixed-Use Zoning consolidation petition and accompanying ordinances including the outlined changes: a. Implementing a geographical specific stepback in the Sugar House additional height area (McClelland to 1300 East, 2100 S to I-80) requiring a 10' front stepback after 30' of height, applicable to the MU- 8 and MU-11 zones, and requiring a 10' front stepback after 85' of height as originally proposed for all other MU-8 and MU-11 areas; and, b. Setting the effective date of three-months after adoption. Legislative Actions a. I further move the Council adopt the following legislative actions, initiating the zoning amendments for the following items as outlined in the July 8 staff report: · Review Interior Block Study for potential downzones · Update the Central Community master plan related to the State Street Corridor · Review on-street parking policies and ordinances regarding impacts related to new development b. I further move the Council adopt a legislative action, requesting the administration review and propose changes to the standards for new construction and major additions to more specifically identify appropriate setbacks and step backs when development is adjacent to contributing structures in historic districts. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano NAY: Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 4 – 3 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 7 Council Member Petro offered an amendment to the motion to change the effective date to four-months after adoption. Council Member Dugan rejected the proposed amendment. Summary: Council Members discussed reasoning/justification for extending the effective date timeframe and retaining the proposed three-month timeframe. Council Remarks: Following the original motion’s vote, Council Member Young took a moment of personal privilege to thank all residents of the city for being engaged in the process over the past year and noted the mixed-used zoning consolidation before the Council this evening represented a thoughtful and balanced compromise, responding to the city’s urgent need for affordable housing and ensuring character and charm is retained.   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions.   2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Krista Cook spoke to Rose Park Baseball, a local recreational league in support of players of all skill levels for 70 years, and to supporting the renaming of the ball field in Neil Draper’s honor.    Stephen Otterstrom expressed excitement regarding the Ballpark community design plan and to the opportunities for family housing and co-ops, with owners being the shareholders of the apartment complexes they lived in.     E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 8   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Naming The Northeast Baseball Field at Riverside Park as The Neil Draper Field The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would rename the northeast baseball field at Riverside Park as the Neil Draper Field. Mr. Draper was an engaged member of the community and business owner who passed away in March 2025. His dedication and contributions to Rose Park Baseball had a positive impact on many in the area.   Summary: Council Member Petro spoke to her fondness for Rose Park and to the Draper family being pivotal to the community’s place making and giving youth of the neighborhood positive ways to identify themselves. Council Member Petro read the resolution.  Susan Draper Marshall (daughter of Neil Draper) spoke to her father’s legacy, his endless support for the youth of Rose Park baseball and many other sports teams throughout the Salt Lake Valley, and thanked the Council for keeping Neil Draper’s legacy alive by renaming the park.   Council Member Puy recognized Council Member Petro for spearheading the ballpark renaming effort and championing the voice of Westside residents.  Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Resolution 19 of 2025, naming the northeast baseball field at Riverside Park as the “Neil Draper Field”. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinances: Truth-in-Taxation Hearing for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will set the date for Tuesday, August 19, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting one or more ordinances approving the final rate of tax levy, for all City funds including the Library Fund, in an amount greater than the Certified MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 9 Tax Rate, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and adopting the final budget, including the Library Budget, for Fiscal Year 2025-26.    2. Ordinance: Design Review Standards Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Chapter 21A.59 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to Design Review. The proposal would clarify when each section applies to a project, ensure code language clearly communicates the standard’s intent, and delete duplicative standards from the chapter. The proposal would also introduce new design standards to further the purpose of the design review process.   3. Ordinance: Parking Regulations in the Downtown Zoning Districts Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a ordinance that would amend the parking regulations in the Downtown and Gateway zoning districts sections of the Salt Lake City Code. The proposal is a Citywide text amendment that will affect the D-1 (Central Business District), D-2 (Downtown Support District), D-3 (Downtown Warehouse/Residential District), D-4 (Downtown Secondary Central Business District) and G-MU (Gateway-Mixed Use District) zoning district regulations. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition.   4. Ordinance Amendment of Chapter 11.14 Parties, Gatherings, or Events The Council will set the date of Tuesday, August 12, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an Ordinance that would amend Chapter 11.14 of the Salt Lake City Code to establish an administrative process and civil fine in the event of large, unruly gatherings on private property that include illegal activity and disturbances. The proposal would establish a civil enforcement remedy for the City to replace the recently eliminated service fee associated with police officers responding to such calls for service. A companion ordinance will be transmitted and will establish the appeals process for any of these citations.   5. Board Appointment: Library Board – Sarah Vaughn MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 10 The Council will consider approving the appointment of Sarah Vaughn to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2028.   6. Board Appointment: Library Board – Margaret Neville The Council will consider approving the appointment of Margaret Neville to the Library Board for a term ending June 30, 2028.   7. Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Solomon Brumbaugh The Council will consider approving the appointment of Solomon Brumbaugh to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 25, 2028.    Motion: Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt the Consent Agenda. . AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT:       MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 11 Meeting adjourned at 8:38 pm.  Minutes Approved:  _______________________________  City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________  City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.    This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, July 8, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 8, 2025 12 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Matthew Brown- Deputy City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1     LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Wharton to approve Resolution 2 of 2025, adopting the Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 of the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 2 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and convene as the Community Reinvestment Agency. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Dugan to adopt Resolution 10 of 2025, approving the Fiscal Year 2026 CRA Budget reflected in the attached Key Changes spreadsheet. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Director Wharton, seconded by Director Mano to adjourn as the Community Reinvestment Agency and convene as the Salt Lake City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2025 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Summary: Council Member Puy read the Resolution. Stacy Smith (Car Show Coordinator, Juneteenth Festival Event) was present to accept the Resolution. Council Member Lopez Chavez arrived during this agenda item. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Joint Resolution 15 of 2025, recognizing June 19, 2025 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE.   H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: Ordinances and Resolutions listed below (H1 – H15) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 6 1.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the Budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 32 of 2025, approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund, including the contingent appropriations as listed on the motion sheet under Motion #2, Items A and B. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 7   Motion: Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt Ordinance 31 of 2025, approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 33 of 2025, setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as listed on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax Commission. The Council has asked the Attorney’s Office to work with the State Tax Commission and Attorneys to review the recent tax advice regarding the library budget, understanding the new advice combining the Library and City as one tax entity, to outline its impacts to both the Library and City budgets and changes to policy oversight. A tax of 0.003180 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which: A. 0.002130 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $108,006,905 of ongoing revenue; and B. 0.000011 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $579,167 of one-time revenue; and C. 0.000630 shall be credited as revenue in the Library Fund, generating $31,945,704 of ongoing revenue; and MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 8 D. 0.000328 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $16,634,258 of ongoing revenue; and E. 0.000081 shall be credited as revenue in the Governmental Immunity Fund for tort liability, generating $4,107,305 of ongoing revenue. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 34 of 2025, amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers and Executive Municipal Officers The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 9 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 35 of 2025, approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municiple officers of Salt Lake City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 6.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 37 of 2025, approving a compensation plan for all non- represented employees of Salt Lake City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 7.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 10 implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 36 of 2025, appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 8.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 38 of 2025, appropriating the necessary funds to implement for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 9.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 39 of 2025, amending Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 10.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 40 of 2025, amending Sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 11.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 41 of 2025, amending Sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods. (Items H4 through H13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 12.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the last annual budget.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to defer this item to a future meeting date. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 13.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Complying with Rate Study and Regulatory Requirements The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Chapter 17 of the Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply with regulatory requirements.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 14 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 42 of 2025, amending Chapter 17 of the Salt Lake City Code, complying with rate study and regulatory requirements. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 14.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt $55,806,110 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $13,489,253 in funding as shown on the motion sheet. Later this year, the Council will consider CIP project-specific allocations. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 15 15.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes Implementation The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in 2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinances A-K as shown on the Motion Sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget, with the exception of Item I, Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department, which will be deferred to a future meeting date. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Resolution 17 of 2025, authorizing the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No. 9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5, Items 1 through 10. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 16 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Council Member Puy reiterated the rules of decorum. Cheneil Hill spoke regarding a proposed Sex Offender Registry Violation Act, the importance of its passage by State Legislators, and asked for the Council for their support on the matter. Scott Bates, on behalf of the Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation, expressed appreciation for the City’s cooperation with the rezone in connection with the recent annexation process for the Northpointe area. Mark Harousseau spoke to a dangerous intersection in his neighborhood (location inaudible) and urged the Council to support the installation of a hawk signal to enhance safety for pedestrians. Abdirizak Ibrahim spoke to issues facing the Westside of the City such as lack of affordable family-sized housing, no hospital, and no high school in the Glendale neighborhood. Lisia Satini spoke to issues facing the Westside, including safety, homelessness, healthcare (lack of hospital), and asked the Council for additional support for refugee communities of color on the Westside of the City. Council Remarks: Council Member Young addressed the request/need for a hawk signal at the dangerous intersection and said many neighbors had voiced concerns, options were being reviewed, and described looking forward to further conversation regarding the issue. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 17 K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Northpoint Area Annexation The Council will consider adopting an ordinance annexing certain unincorporated properties North-Northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake County border with Davis County. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/NorthpointAnnexationSLC .   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Ordinance 43 of 2025, annexing certain unincorporated properties north-northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake County border with Davis County pursuant to ordinance and maps included in Attachment A. I further move the Council adopt a Legislative Action requesting the administration to review the property at approximately 2699 West 3300 North for potential rezoning to M1-A. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment for Public Hearing Requirements for Appeals and Variances The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to public hearing requirements for appeals and variances. The proposal makes the necessary changes to comply with House Bill 368 (HB368), adopted by the Utah Legislature in 2025 and went into effect on May 7, 2025. One part of HB368 prohibits cities from holding a public hearing for any appeals of a land use decision and requests for variances. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00327.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 18 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will set the date for Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project- specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Board Appointment: Airport Board – Jonathan Freedman The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jonathan Freedman to the Airport Board for a term ending June 10, 2029.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 19 4.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Jenny Bonk The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jenny Bonk to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Brad Christensen The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Brad Christensen to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:36 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 20 Council Minutes Approved: CRA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 21 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Formal Session on Tuesday, September 9, 2025.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative Leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Caitlin Carlino – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart –  Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder,  The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 1 A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of April 8, 2025 and May 6, 2025.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the work session meeting minutes of April 8, 2025 and May 6, 2025. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 5.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall declaring Sept. 15 - Oct. 15, 2025 as Hispanic Heritage Month in Salt Lake City.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Joint Ceremonial Resolution 30 declaring September 15, 2025 through October 15, 2025 as Hispanic Heritage Month in Salt Lake City. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Summary: Council Member Puy read the Joint Resolution celebrating and honoring Hispanic Heritage Month in Salt Lake City. Council Member Petro made a statement referencing a September 8, 2025 Supreme Court decision and noted contributions made by immigrants and pioneers in Utah. Council Member Puy referenced current affairs and emphasized the importance of unity and supporting one another. Dr. Jose Enriquez (CEO and Founder of Latinos in Action) accepted the Joint Resolution and delivered remarks in recognition of Hispanic Heritage Month, expressing pride in Hispanic heritage, highlighting the pathways and leadership opportunities Latinos in Action provided for youth, and emphasized the importance of continuing to showcase the positive contributions of Hispanic individuals.    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 2 B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes items which relate to the Main Street fire on August 11, 2025, including funding for an emergency loan fund program, rental assistance, and funding for barriers to allow safe pedestrian passage in front of the buildings burned in the recent fire, among other items.   For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.    FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, September 2, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, September 9, 2025 or Tuesday, October 7, 2025    Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to close the public hearing and consider each item separately for Ordinance 54 of 2025, Budget Amendment #1 for FY 2025-26. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez, Victoria Petro Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to approve Item A-3 for Public Right-of-Way Safety barricades. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to approve Item A-1 for the Emergency Loan Program. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 3 ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to defer Item A-4 for Rental Assistance. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to request additional information from the Administration on the programs, including a recommendation on how to address the following topics: • identify criteria for when and why the City would make similar financial assistance programs available in response to other events, tragedies, or community needs, • identify any requirements for use of the Emergency Loan funds, and • considerations for higher boarded building fees within the CBD. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass There were no public comments. Council Remarks: Council Member Puy stated he looked forward to clarification on policy deployment and community outreach to explain the rental assistance tool in Item A-4.  Council Member Lopez Chavez experienced technical difficulties and was unable to vote consistently for this agenda item.   C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 247 North 800 West The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning for the properties at approximately 247 North 800 West from R-1/7,000 (Single-Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential) to R-1/5,000 (Single- Family Residential) and SR-3 (Special Development Pattern Residential). The proposal would enable development to the west of the existing single-family home. Any new development will be accessed from Hoyt Place, which is a private road. Consideration MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 4 may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petitioner: Bert Holland, representing the property owner. Petition No.:PLNPCM2024-00629.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 56 of 2025 for a Zoning Map Amendment at approximately 247 North 800 West. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 2. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Approximately 373 West American Avenue The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley situated adjacent to properties at approximately 373 West American Avenue.  The proposal would close the alley to public use and allow the property owner of three of the four adjacent properties to potentially redevelop this site (the other adjacent property owner also supports the alley vacation.) The alley cannot be used as a mid-block connection because the 900 South viaduct is directly to the south. Located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Jarod Hall. Petition No.: PLNPCM2023-00636.   This item was removed from the agenda.   3. Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment Public Lands (PL) and Street Vacation - West High School The Council will consider adopting the proposed Text Amendment and Street Vacation ordinances at approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School.  The proposed changes include:  • Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. This would apply to all PL zoning districts. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District.  Petition No.: PLNPCM2025- 00320. • Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00321.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 5 For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/2fdcpe2z.    Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Petro to postpone action to a future Council Meeting. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 4. Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment for Delta Center Arena Parking Garage at Approximately 301 West South Temple The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a Master Development Agreement for the construction of the Delta Center parking garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. The proposal includes the construction of a seven-story parking garage with approximately 452 parking stalls at the southwest corner of the site, which is intended to provide parking for patrons of the Delta Center Arena and improve the site's functionality. The applicant is requesting approval of the development agreement associated with the project, which establishes specific rules for constructing the parking garage at the Delta Center Arena. If approved, the proposed development agreement could supersede several of the City's rules and regulations. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: Jazz Arena Investors LLC. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00619.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 57 of 2025 for a Zoning Map Amendment / Development Agreement for the Delta Center Parking Garage at approximately 301 West South Temple. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Council Remarks: Council Member Petro thanked staff and the Applicant for their work and communication on the item, emphasized the need for future planning related to bicycle and pedestrian travel and safety, and encouraged taking a holistic view of the project and surrounding block. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 6 Council Member Puy spoke of the strong coordination and communication between Council and the Applicant while drafting the development agreement but emphasized the need for future mindful planning with a focus on developing westward. Council Member Lopez Chavez attempted to convey her nay vote via electronic means; however, due to technical difficulties the vote was not cast during the meeting.   D.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions.   2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Stephen Otterstrom spoke in opposition to the Delta Center Arena Parking Garage ordinance, citing concerns about public funding, revenue impacts, and the need for additional parking. Josh Velasquez, representing the Downtown Community Council, spoke in opposition to the Delta Center Arena Parking Garage ordinance, stating it lacked ground-floor activation, conflicted with the City’s vision plan, and primarily benefited private owners rather than residents. Council Remarks: Council Member Puy spoke about the Delta Center Arena Parking Garage, highlighting its role in supporting the City’s overall success. He noted that sales tax revenue from the site would benefit residents through city services, such as street repair and upkeep, and help maintain a vibrant downtown, which was essential to prevent decline experienced in other cities. He also emphasized the Ordinance included a path for amendment.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 7 E.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   G.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Partial Street Vacation at Approximately 1101 West 400 South The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would close a portion of the public right-of-way on both 1100 West and 400 South adjacent to the property located at 1101 West 400 South. The closure would facilitate the future construction of a new single- family residence on the property. The petitioner is requesting to purchase this portion of the right-of-way and include it in their property boundary. The area is approximately five feet between the property boundary and the public sidewalk. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Erik Sansom, property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00178.   2. Ordinance: Modify Residential Buffer Prohibitions Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to residential buffer prohibitions. The proposal would review the land uses that are subject to, or should be subject to, the 1,000-foot prohibition from residential zoning districts. The proposal also included reviewing whether other land uses should be subject to the provision and clarifying how the distance is measured. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01357.    3. Ordinance: Utility Installation Exemptions Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 21, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to utility installation exemptions. The proposal would clarify the application of utility exemptions and standardize the footnotes in MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 8 related land use tables. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01352.    4. Resolution: Substantial Amendment to the HOME-ARP Allocation Plan The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would reallocate $230,306 in U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) HOME-American Rescue Plan (ARP) funds. Since these funds were allocated in 2024, Housing Stability Division staff and the service providers have recognized the need for case management to support some of the households receiving Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. Shifting funds to the Supportive Services category will enable the contracted organizations to provide this additional service while remaining within the City’s existing HUD allocation.   5. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Liberty Heights Plat The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a portion of City-owned alley between approximately 1430 East and 1500 East, and between 1300 South and Sherman Avenue. The alley segment is not utilized for access by any abutting property and is obstructed at multiple points. Located within Council District 6. Petitioner: Philip Wilkes, adjacent property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00219.    6. Ordinance: Local Landmark Site Designation for Sampson-Altadena Apartments The Council will set the date of Tuesday, October 7, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting and ordinance that would establish the Sampson and Altadena Apartments as a local landmark site. The site consists of two buildings on one lot at approximately 276 East 300 South and 310 South 300 East. Located within Council District 4. Petitioner: The Sampson-Altadena Condominiums Homeowner Association. Petition No.: PLNHLC2025-00357.   7. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Anthony Wright The Council will consider approving the appointment of Anthony Wright, resident of District 6, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.  MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 9   8. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Denise Begue The Council will consider approving the appointment of Denise Begue, resident of District 3, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    9. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Pablo Cruz-Ayalo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Pablo Cruz-Ayalo, resident of District 5, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    10. Board Appointment: Arts Council – Nicholas Pedersen The Council will consider approving the appointment of Nicholas Pedersen, resident of District 2, to the Arts Council for a term ending September 9, 2028.    11. Board Reappointment: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board – Aaron Wiley The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Aaron Wiley, resident of District 1, to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a term ending September 9, 2028. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 10   Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve the Consent Agenda.. AYE: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Daniel Dugan, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Victoria Petro ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass H.ADJOURNMENT:       MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 11 Meeting adjourned at 7:44 p.m. Minutes Approved:  _______________________________  City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________  City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.    This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, September 9, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 9, 2025 12 JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING TRANSGENDER AWARENESS WEEK AND TRANSGENDER DAY OF REMEMBRANCE 2025 Transgender Awareness Week, observed annually from November 13 through 19, seeks to raise awareness, visibility, and understanding of the transgender community by sharing stories and experiences, educating the public, and advocating against prejudice, discrimination, and violence; and in 1999, Gwendolyn Ann Smith, a transgender woman, founded the first Transgender Day of Remembrance to honor Rita Hester and other transgender individuals whose lives were taken by acts of violence; and Transgender Day of Remembrance serves as a time to honor those lost to transphobic violence and discrimination, while renewing our collective resolve to ensure safety, dignity, and respect for all; and this observance also celebrates the vibrancy, diversity, and resilience of the transgender community, and recognizes the invaluable contributions and achievements of transgender individuals; and Salt Lake City affirms its commitment to equality, justice, and inclusion by uplifting transgender voices, experiences, and leadership, and by fostering a community where every person is seen, heard, and valued; and Salt Lake City remains dedicated to advancing equity and opportunity for transgender residents through inclusive policies and community partnerships; and Salt Lake City stands firmly against discrimination, harassment, and violence targeting transgender and gender-diverse people. that the Salt Lake City Council and the Mayor of Salt Lake City honor and celebrate the lives, strength, and contributions of transgender people; reaffirm the City’s commitment to stand against stigma and transphobic violence; and formally recognize the week of November 13 through 19, 2025, as Transgender Awareness Week, and Thursday, November 20, 2025, as Transgender Day of Remembrance. B1 & B2 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: November 18, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 and B-2 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes. $1 million Source: local resources from combination of developer in- kind support & city staff & consulting contribu- tions None Innovative Finance & Asset Concession Grant Program (IFAC) If approved, the grant will fund the conversion of the Sugar House Station Area into a mixed-use, transit- oriented development (“TOD”) district. Needs Public Hearing No.$2 million in federal funding and $1 million match (in- kind support) U.S. Dept. of Transporta- tion Transportation Division 2.No.None.FY24 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational Solicitation Grant SUBAWARD If approved, the grant will fund the purchase of License Plate Reader cameras which will be installed on major roads leading to other counties and used as routine law enforcement operations to improve public safety and reduce criminal activity. Note: Davis County applied for this grant and the Police Dept. is a subawardee. Needs a Public Hearing Yes.$224,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Svcs. Police Department Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Annie Christensen DATE: October 2, 2025 SUBJECT: IFAC Innovative Finance and Asset Concession Grant Program FUNDING AGENCIES: Department of Transportation GRANT PROGRAM: IFAC Innovative Finance and Asset Concession Grant Program REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $3,000,000 ($2,000,000 federal share, $1,000,000 match) DEPARTMENT: Transportation COLLABORATING AGENCIES: DATE SUBMITTED: 9/30/2025 SPECIFICS: Equipment/Supplies Only Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Please see below Match Required ___$1,000,000___________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: Salt Lake City seeks an Expert Services Cooperative Agreement under USDOT’s Innovative Finance and Asset Concession (IFAC) Grant Program to reposition the Sugar House Station Area into a finance-ready, mixed-use, transit-oriented development (“TOD”) district. The Sugar House streetcar line (S-Line) is currently being extended from Fairmont Station eastward past Highland Drive, directly into the Sugar House shopping district. This investment, paired with City-initiated zoning reforms adopted in July 2025 that expand moderate- and higher-density housing options in the Sugar House Business District adjacent to the S-Line extension, provides a once-in-a-generation opportunity to deliver housing, jobs, and services within walking distance of high-capacity transit and the region’s trail system. Through this IFAC award, Salt Lake City will procure financial, legal, technical, and development advisors to advance the Sugar House Station Area to finance-ready implementation. Advisors will conduct feasibility and market analysis, prepare value-for- money assessments, and structure transaction strategies such as joint development agreements, long-term ground leases, or asset concessions. This work will support TIFIA-eligible infrastructure investments, coordinate redevelopment of adjacent parcels, and align private development with City goals. The outcome will be a mixed-use, transit-oriented district that expands attainable housing, strengthens economic vitality, and provides a replicable model for other station areas. Salt Lake City requests $2,000,000 in IFAC funding to be matched with $1,000,000 in local resources contributed through a combination of developer in-kind support (staff time, consultant resources, planning studies, and predevelopment work) and City staff and consulting contributions. The total project budget of $3,000,000 over 26 months reflects the scale and complexity of advancing a high-visibility station area into a finance-ready, transit-oriented development district. This funding level will support innovative financing and delivery strategies while coordinating multiple private redevelopment efforts within a cohesive station- area framework. All local match contributions will be non-federal in origin, directly related to the IFAC scope, and documented at fair market value consistent with 2 CFR Part 200 requirements. B1 & B2 Page 1 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Sylvia Richards, Policy Analyst DATE: November 18, 2025 RE: MOTION SHEET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ________________________________________________________________________________ The Council will conduct a Public Hearing and may consider the following motion: Motion 1 – Close and Refer I move that the Council close the Public Hearing and refer Items B-1 and B-2 to a future Consent Agenda for action. Project Timeline: NEW GRANT APPLICATIONS City Match Required? Number of FTEs Requested Grant Title Grant Purpose Status Annual Grant Total Grant & and FTE Amount Funding Agency Requested By 1.Yes. $1 million Source: local resources from combination of developer in- kind support & city staff & consulting contribu- tions None Innovative Finance & Asset Concession Grant Program (IFAC) If approved, the grant will fund the conversion of the Sugar House Station Area into a mixed-use, transit- oriented development (“TOD”) district. Needs Public Hearing No.$2 million in federal funding and $1 million match (in- kind support) U.S. Dept. of Transporta- tion Transportation Division 2.No.None.FY24 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational Solicitation Grant SUBAWARD If approved, the grant will fund the purchase of License Plate Reader cameras which will be installed on major roads leading to other counties and used as routine law enforcement operations to improve public safety and reduce criminal activity. Note: Davis County applied for this grant and the Police Dept. is a subawardee. Needs a Public Hearing Yes.$224,000 U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Svcs. Police Department Grant Application Submission Notification Memo TO: Office of the City Council |Krystyn Mace, Linda Sanchez, ccanalysts@slc.gov Office of the Mayor | Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto, Jill Love Department of Finance | Ben Luedtke, Mary Beth Thompson, Amy Dorsey, Randy Hillier, cc Grants Team Office of the City Attorney | Jaysen Oldroyd, Mark Kittrell, SLCRecorder@slcgov.com FROM: Laura Nygaard DATE: October 23, 2025 SUBJECT: FY24 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational (Subaward) FUNDING AGENCIES: United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) GRANT PROGRAM: FY24 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational Solicitation REQUESTED GRANT AMOUNT: $224,000 DEPARTMENT: Police COLLABORATING AGENCIES: N/A DATE SUBMITTED: March 15, 2023 SPECIFICS: X Equipment/Supplies Technical Assistance Provides Hourly Positions Existing New Overtime Requires Funding After Grant Explanation: Match Required ______________________ In-Kind Services and Cash GRANT DETAILS: The Salt Lake City Police Department is a subawardee for the Davis County grant application of the FY24 COPS Technology and Equipment Program Invitational Solicitation. The application includes a request for Salt Lake City for the following:  Purchase of License Plate Reader (LPR) cameras  $224,000 (originally requested $183,760, but increased by Davis Co.) o Cameras will be installed as part of a multi-agency LPR program on major egress and ingress roads that lead to other counties and will be utilized as part of routine law enforcement operations to improve public safety and reduce criminal activity.  The project period of the award is for 24 months, 3/9/2024 through 3/31/2026. Item B3 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE: Text Amendment – RMF-35 & RMF-45 Multi Family Zoning District Update PLNPCM2024-01388 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:November 18 2025 RE: Text Amendment – RMF-35 & RMF-45 Multi Family Zoning District Update PLNPCM2024-01388 BRIEFING UPDATE During the October 7, 2025 briefing Council Members discussed current and proposed setbacks. Current side yard setbacks are four feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. The proposal calls for four-foot side yard setbacks on both sides (unless the property abuts single-family zoned parcels, then a 10-foot setback is proposed). Some Council Members expressed concerns with reduced setbacks in areas with small block sizes, and potential loss of trees. Areas with small block sizes have some of the densest residential development in the city. A question was raised about why the proposed changes are good for those living in these areas. Planning staff noted the large number of homes that were constructed before zoning regulations were adopted and are now nonconforming due to current setbacks. The proposal would help bring many of these into compliance. Additionally, Planning discussed the potential for more affordable housing units in these areas which could provide opportunities for younger people to live there without changing the neighborhood character. It could also provide opportunities for current residents to age in place. Council staff provided some context from when the RMF-35 and -45 zoning was created in 1995. At that time the community wanted larger setbacks which resulted in many nonconforming lots. Housing supply and costs are very different today and the pendulum has shifted to smaller setbacks. Planning staff discussed additional height up to 55 feet if utilizing affordable housing incentives that was in the original proposal. That was not supported by the community, so it was removed. Item Schedule: Page | 2 The following information was provided for previous meetings. It is included again for background purposes. ISSUE AT A GLANCE The Council will be briefed about proposed amendments to the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multifamily Residential) and RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multifamily Residential) zoning ordinance and map. Development of medium- to high-density housing types within the zoning districts has not happened since their creation due to a variety of barriers and limitations. The proposed changes are intended to remove those. Several briefings for both the Historic Landmark and Planning Commission were held on the proposal between February and May 2025, and the Planning Commission held two public hearings. (Planning’s staff reports for the Planning Commission meetings that include changes to the proposal as it progressed can be found at the following links: February 12, 2025, March 12, 2025, and May 14, 2025.) Numerous people spoke at the hearings and were about equally divided in support and opposition to the proposal. Those who spoke in favor noted the ineffectiveness of current regulations, concerns about school closures, low-quality housing, and the need for additional housing in the city. Comments in opposition cited potential increased parking issues, loss of sunlight, and impact to solar power, changes to neighborhood character, and decreased property values. Following the May 14, 2025 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously forwarded a favorable recommendation to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed text amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS 1. In recent years the Council has approved a few housing related zoning amendments such as the RMF-30 and Affordable Housing Incentives. The Council may wish to ask the administration how those changes are being received and implemented by developers. a. Some concerns have been raised about the potential for these recent zoning amendments to encourage demolitions of existing housing stock, including naturally occurring affordable housing. The Council may wish to ask the administration if the recently adopted zoning amendments have resulted in more demolitions. 2. How do the proposed changes to RMF-35 and 45 align with the recently adopted RMF-30 zoning district? 3. How do the proposed changes help advance the City’s adopted housing goals? 4. How does the proposal interplay with affordable housing incentives? 5. How do the proposed changes ensure new construction is compatible with the existing development of neighborhoods throughout the city? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In their current form, the two districts are nearly identical except for maximum building height. The Administration’s initial proposal was to combine both districts into one RMF-45 district. Based on feedback from the public and Planning Commission, the proposal was changed to keep the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts separate and allow additional building types to be constructed on vacant lots and as infill projects. Some additional recommended changes include reduced minimum lot sizes, eliminating lot width minimums, upzoning approximately two dozen properties RMF-35 to RMF-45 (found in attachment A to this report), and clarification of density bonuses. These are discussed below. Page | 3 RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning were adopted in 1995 and intended as a transition from low-density neighborhoods to higher intensity areas. Adding multifamily developments to established neighborhoods was also envisioned. However, Planning staff found single-family homes and large apartment buildings have been the primary development patterns for the zones. Only 4% of lots in the districts have had any new development, with a total of eight moderate-density projects in the last 30 years. Minimum lot size requirements are too restrictive. Nearly half of lots in RMF-35 and 45 are smaller than the required 5,000 square feet so new development is not possible. Multi-family buildings cannot be constructed, and single-family homes are the only option. Minimum lot width requirements are too high. Only about one-third of properties in the RMF-35 and 45 zones meet the 50-foot minimum lot width. All others are too narrow. Parking requirements are too high. Planning found that approximately 96% of RMF-35 and 45 properties are within ¼ mile of a transit stop, yet the parking requirements are the same as single- family zones. Affordability, density, and the viability of multifamily projects are impacted by parking requirements that are too high. Plan Salt Lake (2015), and Thriving in Place and Housing SLC, both adopted in 2023. PROPOSAL SUMMARY Align the districts’ purpose with adopted plans and policies Clarify and simplify regulations Encourage moderate density development and infill development Preserve existing buildings and neighborhood character. New “form-based” approach Adjustments to lot requirements Incentives for retention of existing structures Introduction of design standards New landscaping and open space requirements Updates to parking minimums New “Form-Based” Approach Page | 4 Under the proposal, sideways rowhouses and cottage courts would be added to the current list of building types that includes single-family homes, duplexes, street-facing townhomes, and multi-family buildings. Adjustments to Lot Requirements Lot Widths Lot Area Building Form Current Minimum Lot Area Proposed Minimum Lot Area Urban House & Two-family Single-family: 5,000 square feet Two-family: 8,000 square feet 1,500 square feet (for 1 or 2 units) Cottage Development 5,000 square feet per unit, each as a single-family dwelling 500 square feet per unit Row House 3,000 square feet per unit 750 square feet per unit (minimum of 3 units) Multi-family 3 units: 9,000 square feet RMF-35: +2,000 square feet per unit over 3 RMF-45: +1,000 square feet per unit over 3 750 square feet per unit (minimum of 3 units) Non-residential building 5,000 square feet 5,000 square feet Public Street Frontage Incentives for Retention of Existing Structures Design Standards Page | 5 Durable Building Materials: a minimum of 50% of a building’s street-facing façade must use durable materials such as stone, brick, wood siding, shingles, glass, etc. Glass: Depending on building form, 15% to 20% of street-facing floors above the ground floor must be glass. Ground Floor Transparency: Again, depending on building form, 15% to 20% of street-facing ground floors must be glass. Entry Features: Under the proposal, entry features such as a porch and fence, terrace and light well, portico, awning, forecourt, or stoop. Building Fenestration: Street-facing walls cannot exceed a length of 15 feet without interruptions that include windows, doors, or a change in the wall plane with an offset of at least 12 inches. Image illustrating design standards in the RMF-35 and RMF-45 proposed text amendment. Page | 7 Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division Landscaping and Open Space Currently, the RMF-35 and 45 zones do not require open space other than yard setbacks. The proposal recommends open space, landscaping, and personal and shared space that vary based on building forms, as shown in the table below. Building Form Open Space Per Unit-Personal Open Space Per Unit-Common Requirements Urban House and Two-family N/A but subject to lot area requirements. * N/A but subject to lot area requirements. * General landscaping standards Cottage Development 200 square feet 150 square feet General landscaping and proposed open space standards Row House 200 square feet 150 square feet General landscaping and proposed open space standards Multi-family Not permitted 50 square feet General landscaping and proposed open space standards Other Building Forms Not permitted 15% of lot area General landscaping and standards for common open space. *Open space for Urban houses and two-family dwellings Urban house and two-family dwelling building forms would not be permitted to exceed 60% of the lot area. Because these are smaller scale, the proposal does not call for personal or common open space. They would still need to meet applicable landscaping requirements. It is worth noting that the above open space requirements would not apply when a property is within 800 feet of a public park or open space. Landscape Buffers The proposal retains landscape buffers for row houses, multi-family, and non-residential building forms currently found in City code. They would not be required for cottage developments, urban houses, or single-family dwellings. Parking RMF-35 and 45 zoning are both currently in the “General” parking context, which has the highest minimum parking requirements, with one to two parking spaces for each unit, depending on unit type or number of bedrooms (more bedrooms require more parking). It is Planning’s opinion that this context is appropriate for lower-density neighborhoods that are more car dependent and have limited transit access. The proposal recommends including RMF-35 and 45 in the “Neighborhood Center” parking context which requires only one parking space for all types and sizes of dwellings. Planning found that 20% of RMF-35 and 45 properties are within a quarter mile of a fixed rail station and, as noted above, 96% are within a Page | 7 quarter mile of a transit stop. Planning staff also recommends this change to encourage more bedrooms within multifamily and rowhouse dwelling units. The current “General” parking context requires two parking spaces for units with two or more bedrooms. The “Neighborhood Center” context would require one space per dwelling unit regardless of the number of bedrooms. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Factor Finding Whether a proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed amendment furthers the applicable purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies Whether a proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies. The proposal is compatible with the intent of the H Historical Overlay District. The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. Complies The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on city resources necessary to carry out the provisions and processes required by this title. The adequacy of public facilities a services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Proposed amendments will not change the level of impact that development in the affected districts may have on City resources. The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on other properties that would be subject to the proposal and properties adjacent to subject properties. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent and nearby properties due to the change in development potential and allowed uses that do not currently apply to the property. Proposed amendments will ensure that affected properties have equitable development rights and protections by ensuring that the City’s multifamily districts function as they were initially intended. The community benefits that would result from the proposed text amendment, as identified in 21A.50.050.C. While a community benefit is not required, the proposal will bring a diversity of housing options to neighborhoods that have Page | 8 typically excluded new development since 1995. The status of existing transportation facilities, any planned changes to the transportation facilities, and the impact that the proposed amendment may have on the city’s ability, need, and timing of future transportation improvements. There are adequate transportation facilities to support the potential additional growth from the proposed amendment. The proximity of necessary amenities such as parks, open space, schools, fresh food, entertainment, cultural facilities, and the ability of current and future residents to access these amenities without having to rely on a personal vehicle. RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts are, for the most part, located within neighborhoods close enough to the listed amenities for access without reliance on personal vehicles. The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendments. No public safety concerns were reported during the department review process. Developments will be reviewed for compliance with building codes and fire prevention standards. The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. No more displacement anticipated than current regulations allow. A citywide amendment will help alleviate displacement pressure in vulnerable parts of the city. The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendments and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Proposed amendments are not expected to displace businesses or change their status under current zoning regulations. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • December 2, 2024 – Initial study of RMF-35 and 45 districts published. • December 11, 2024 – o Project story map launched. o 45-day notice sent to recognized community organizations. • December 12, 2024 – Focus group with small-scale affordable housing developers. • December 14, 2024 – Petition to merge RMF-35 and 45 districts initiated by Mayor Mendenhall. • December 23, 2024 – Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the affected properties were provided early notification of the proposal and the March 12, 2025 Planning Commission Page | 10 hearing date. • January-March 2025 – Planning presented at community council meetings. • January 8, 2025 – Public notice signs advertising the proposal and the March 12, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing posted at all Salt Lake City Public Library branches. • January 22, 2025 – General community open house at City Hall. • February 12, 2025 – First Planning Commission briefing. • February 28, 2025 – Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division listserv. • March 12, 2025 – o Second Planning Commission briefing. o First public hearing. • May 14, 2025 – o Third Planning Commission briefing. o Second public hearing. • August 6, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. Page | 9 Attachment A – Properties Proposed to be Rezoned From RMF-35 to RMF-45 Address Council District Land Use Neighborhood Plan 321 S Concord St.2 Located at Neighborhood Node Westside Master Plan 866 West 700 South 870 West 700 South 876 West 700 South 665 South 900 West 2 Nonresidential Use Located at Neighborhood Node Westside Master Plan 1659 West 300 South 1671 West 300 South 1677West 300 South 351 South Concord St. 2 Located at Regional Node and Redwood Road Corridor Westside Master Plan 8 East Hillside Ave.3 High-density Residential Capitol Hill 321 South 600 East 323 South 600 East 602 East 300 South 4 Medium Residential/ Mixed-use Central Community Plan 120 West Mead Ave. 126 West Mead Ave. 130 West Mead Ave. 5 Central 9th Corridor Area Ballpark Station Area Plan 1414 South West Temple 5 Medium Density Transition Area Ballpark Station Area Plan 976 South 200 East 5 Medium High Density Central Community Plan 996 South 200 East 5 Medium High Density Central Community Plan 1418 South 1100 East 5 Low Residential/ Mixed-Use Central Community Plan 2321 East 2100 South 6 Medium High Density Residential Sugar House Neighborhood Plan 2673 South Preston St.7 Medium High Density Residential Sugar House Neighborhood Plan 1945 South 1300 East 1949 South 1300 East 7 Medium High Density Residential Sugar House Neighborhood Plan 1121 East Brickyard Road 7 Medium High Density Residential Sugar House Neighborhood Plan SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/22/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/06/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Barlow, Aaron E-mail aaron.barlow@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/01/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/06/2025 Subject: Text Amendment - RMF-35 & RMF-45 Multi Family Zoning District Update Additional Staff Contact: Krissy Gilmore - kristina.gilmore@slc.govGrant Amann - grant.amaan@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Aaron Barlow - aaron.barlow@slc.govKrissy Gilmore - kristina.gilmore@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council follow the Planning Commission’s recommendation and approve the requested zoning text and map amendments. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Please review Attached memo. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Salt Lake City is proposing amendments to the zoning ordinance and map intended to update the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multifamily Residential and RMF-45 (Moderate/High Density Multifamily Residential) zoning districts. These proposed changes aim to remove barriers to new housing development and facilitate compatible infill within the City’s moderate-density neighborhoods. These proposed updates introduce design standards for new development, reduce minimum lot size requirements, eliminate lot width minimums, permit multiple buildings per lot, and offer a density bonus for preserving existing housing units. In 2023, the City Council adopted Housing SLC, a five-year comprehensive housing plan for the City. That plan calls for changes to zoning regulations that can support an established goal of entitling 10,000 new units throughout the City. Later, in 2023, the City Council also adopted Thriving in Place, Salt Lake City’s Anti-Displacement Strategy, which found that “Salt Lake City has a shortage of housing at every income level, but an especially significant shortage of housing affordable to lower-income households” (p. 15). Among other things, Thriving in Place calls for City staff to “create more diverse housing choices in all areas so that people can find housing that meets their needs in locations that work for them” (p. 48). This proposal aims to update the RMF- 35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) and the RMF-45 (Moderate/High-Density Multi-Family) zoning districts to align with key City plans and policies, including Plan Salt Lake (2015), Thriving in Place (2023), and Housing SLC (2023). WHY UPDATE THESE REGULATIONS? Initially adopted in 1995, the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts were intended to support a variety of medium- to high-density housing types. Development in these districts was meant to serve as a transition from low-density neighborhoods to higher-intensity areas and allow multi- family development to be integrated into established neighborhoods. However, since their creation, both districts have driven two predominant housing outcomes: single-family homes and large-scale apartment building developments. In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of this gap in our housing, referred to as “the missing middle,” and a desire to create more diverse housing choices. Existing District Complications 1. Minimum Lot Size Requirements Are Too Restrictive: 47% of the lots are smaller than 5,000 square feet and do not meet the minimum lot area for new development. Due to their size, these lots would only be eligible for single-family development. This means the two districts cannot accommodate moderate-density development intended for each zoning district. Additionally, what moderate density already exists is likely nonconforming (or “grandfathered”). 2. Minimum Lot Width Requirements Are Too High: To construct any new building, the lot must be at least 50’ wide. 66% of the lots within the two districts do not meet this minimum width. This means that only 1/3 of properties are eligible for redevelopment. All other lots are too narrow. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 2 3. Parking Requirements Are Too High: Approximately 96% of RMF-35 and RMF-45 properties are within ¼ miles of a public transit stop. However, both districts have the same parking requirements as single-family zones. Requiring too much parking can significantly impact the affordability, density, and feasibility of development proposals. As a result, over the past 30 years, only 4% of lots within these districts have seen any development, with just eight projects resulting in moderate- density housing. Most completed projects were low- density, like single-family houses. Due to challenges in meeting existing zoning standards, many of these projects also required special approvals. As they are currently written, both districts have encouraged the removal of older, more affordable units (known as “naturally occurring affordable housing”) for new development that is incompatible with its surroundings. For more information on background and research contributing to the proposal, refer to Planning staff’s study of the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. WHY DOES THIS MATTER? Housing Pressure Utah is on track to be short more than 150,000 housing units by 2030 (Kem Gardner Policy Institute). In Salt Lake City, housing costs have risen far faster than wages. Since 2005, wages have grown by 19%, but rents have climbed 38% and home prices have risen 83%. As a result, over half of renter households in the city are now considered cost-burdened. Despite steady construction—about 1,700 new units per year since 2017—production has not kept pace with demand. The gap continues to widen. The illustration above shows the range of “Missing Middle” housing types. Image © Opticos Design. Inc. For more info visit: https://missingmiddlehousing.com "Moderate-scale" or "missing middle" housing refers to housing types that fall between single-family homes and high-rise apartment buildings. These homes are appropriately scaled, thoughtfully designed, and located to support walkable neighborhoods. Examples include cottage courts, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and small to medium multi-unit apartments. They are intended to be compatible in scale with single-family neighborhoods while providing a gradual transition to higher-density areas. WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "MODERATE-SCALE" AND “MISSING MIDDLE” HOUSING? PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 3 Zoning’s Role Zoning is one of the many factors that influence housing costs. In this case, rules within the RMF- 35 and RMF-45 districts have sharply limited what can be built. Restrictions on lot size, setbacks, and other standards make it challenging to add units, even when the land is otherwise suitable for infill development. This stalls the gradual aging and turnover of housing stock that typically leads to more affordable homes over time—a process often referred to as “filtering.” Without new construction, even older housing becomes more expensive. Impacts on Property Owners: Allowing more housing options, such as accessory units or small-scale infill, can offer practical benefits to homeowners, making it easier to age in place, generate supplemental income, or support extended families under one roof. Unfortunately, numerous requirements in the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zones hinder this flexibility. These proposed changes can help create more inclusive, financially sustainable communities while addressing the City’s growing housing needs. Equity Issues: Like much of the United States, zoning regulations have influenced where people can live in Salt Lake City. Historically, land use policies have excluded lower-income households from many neighborhoods, concentrating new housing near freeways or arterial roads, areas that typically have worse air quality, more noise, and weaker health outcomes. Meanwhile, large parts of the city are zoned only for single-family homes, which are not subject to federal accessibility requirements and are largely out of reach for people with disabilities or lower incomes. Revising RMF zoning can help distribute housing opportunities more evenly and expand access to healthier, better-served areas. Addressing these systemic zoning issues is essential to creating a more inclusive and equitable City. Water Considerations Building more housing closer together, with smaller lots, reduced setbacks, or infill, can reduce per capita water use. Research (cited in staff’s report for the Planning Commission's meeting on March 12, 2025) shows that compact development, especially moderate-density development, uses existing infrastructure more efficiently than single-family development and supports long-term water savings. These principles have been incorporated into the zoning proposal currently under consideration. The illustration above shows how dwelling units make their way down the housing ladder, providing housing opportunities for lower incomes as they age. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. For more info visit: cmhc-schl.gc.ca/ PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 4 PROPOSAL SUMMARY The following is a summary of the proposal approved by the Planning Commission. Throughout the last part of 2024, the Planning Staff developed new regulations based on their initial research and feedback from other departments. The initial proposal was developed based on key proposal objectives (listed to the right), intended to align it with adopted plans and policies. Feedback from residents, community councils, businesses, developers, and commissioners (from both the Planning Commission and the Historic Landmark Commission) shaped updates developed by staff. The proposal underwent several iterations before the Planning Commission ultimately recommended approval to the City Council at its meeting on May 14, 2025. New “Form-Based” Approach This proposal takes a form-based approach to regulating new development. Form-based regulations are development standards that vary based on the type of proposed building. Currently, all residential building types (i.e., multi-family apartments, attached townhouses, individual detached houses, or duplexes) are subject to the same standards. This one-size-fits-all approach overlooks the distinct impacts different building forms have on adjacent properties, the street, and the overall neighborhood. Instead, under the proposed regulations, each building form would be assessed individually with customized standards for setbacks, building heights, and design. Finally, in addition to single-family homes, duplexes, multi-family buildings, and street-facing townhouses, the proposal adds sideways-oriented rowhouses and cottage courts as permitted building types. Adjustments to Lot Requirements These updates include several changes to lot and building configuration standards, specifically adjustments to the lot width, lot area, and public street frontage requirements for the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. •Align the district’s purpose with adopted plans and policies. •Clarify and simplify regulations. •Encourage moderate density development and infill development. •Preserve existing buildings and neighborhood character. Key Proposal Objectives The illustration above shows residential building forms that would be permitted within the proposed RMF-45 zoning district. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 5 Lot Width The current RMF-35 & RMF-45 districts specify minimum lot widths by use. Rather than requiring minimums, these updates would require a maximum lot width of 110 feet, or approximately ¼ of a city block. Lot Area Currently, housing density in the RMF-35 and RMF- 45 districts is determined by a sliding scale; the larger the lot, the greater the density allowed. As shown in the table, this proposal standardizes and reduces minimum lot area requirements. Building Form Current Minimum Lot Area Proposed Minimum Lot Area Single-Family: Two-Family:1,500 sq ft (for 1 or 2 units) Cottage Development 500 sq ft per unit Row House 3,000 sq ft per unit 750 sq ft per unit Minimum 3 units Multi-Family 3 units: RMF-35: +2,000 sq ft per unit over 3 RMF-45: 750 sq ft per unit Minimum 3 units 5,000 sq ft 5,000 sq ft Public Street Frontage The RMF-35 & RMF-45 districts currently require all buildings and lots to have frontage along a public street. Exceptions can only be approved by the Planning Commission. The proposed updates include a general provision that permits lots and buildings without public street frontage, provided certain conditions are met. Incentives for Retention of Existing Structures Increasing development potential carries the potential risk of existing housing being demolished and redeveloped. To mitigate displacement pressure, this proposal includes incentives for retaining existing structures, similar to those in the RMF-30 zoning district. Maintaining one or two dwelling units awards two bonus units beyond the minimum lot area (or density) requirement. Retaining PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 6 three or more dwelling units on a lot allows four additional units. Unlike the Zoning Incentives for building preservation (that would still be permitted in this proposal), this benefit would not require principal buildings to be older than 50 years. Design Standards The current RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts lack standards for the exterior design of new buildings, often resulting in development that feels disconnected from the pedestrian experience and out of step with the neighborhood character. These proposed updates introduce comprehensive design standards intended to ensure that all new development makes a positive contribution to the community. Key features included: • Durable Building Materials: At least 50% of the street-facing facade must use high-quality, durable, natural materials like stone, brick, wood siding, shingles, glass, etc. • Glass: 15% to 20% of all street-facing floors above the ground floor must be glass. The building form determines the exact amount. • Ground Floor Transparency: 15% to 20% of all street-facing ground floors must be glass. The building form determines the exact amount. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 7 • Entry Features: Each ground-floor building entrance facing the street must have an entry feature. Examples include a porch and fence, a terrace and light well, a portico, an awning, a forecourt, or a stoop. • Building Fenestration: No building wall that faces onto a street shall exceed more than 15 feet in length without being interrupted by windows, doors, or a change of building wall plane that results in an offset of at least 12 inches. Landscaping and Open Space Beyond basic yard setback requirements, open space is not currently required in the RMF-35 or RMF-45 zoning districts. Due to varying impacts and resident needs, open space and landscaping requirements for new development would differ based on building form under this proposal. Requirements for personal and shared open space are also differentiated with these updates. A complete summary of the proposed landscaping and open space requirements can be found in staff’s memo for the Planning Commission’s February 12, 2025, briefing. Parking The current RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts both fall under the ‘General’ parking context, where parking requirements can vary (based on unit type or number of bedrooms) from one to two spaces per dwelling unit. This context is particularly suitable for lower-density neighborhoods with limited transit access, which tend to be highly car-oriented, such as single-family neighborhoods and industrial areas. However, Staff’s analysis of the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts found that 96% of their lots were within a quarter mile of a transit stop, and more than 20% are within a quarter mile of a fixed rail station. To better align the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts with their transportation reality, these updates place them under the ‘Neighborhood Center’ context, where new dwelling units are required to have only one parking space (regardless of building type or number of units). This context is appropriate for neighborhoods with more pedestrian-scale development and amenities, while acknowledging that most residents will be car owners. MARCH 2025 UPDATES Cottage Development Requirements A consistent theme from Staff’s discussions with community members was an interest in the cottage development building form. Initially, staff had proposed a larger minimum lot area for cottage developments compared to other building forms (1,000 square feet per unit versus 750 square feet per unit). After some consideration, staff determined that, due to the smaller scale of their buildings, cottage developments could accommodate reduced minimum lot area and open space requirements, and made the following changes: • Minimum lot area: Reduced from 1,000 square feet to 500 sq. ft. per cottage unit. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 8 • Minimum open space area: Reduced personal open space area from 200 sq. ft. to 150 sq. ft. per unit and reduced common open space from 150 sq. ft. to 100 sq. ft. per unit. Zoning Incentives A second consistent theme from both the community and commissioners was a concern about the potential scale of new development. In particular, there was concern about the additional height that could be allowed through zoning incentives. Planning staff’s initial proposal would have allowed up to five stories (up to 55 feet in height) for new multi-family building projects that qualified for either Affordable Housing or Building Preservation incentives. Acknowledging these concerns, the additional height for incentives was removed from the proposal in March 2025. While projects that qualify for incentives would need to meet the height requirements for the base zoning district with this change, they could still receive an exemption from many other zoning regulations, including minimum lot area (density). Open Space Exception Finally, another consistent yet surprising theme was an interest in reducing the minimum open space area requirement for properties located near public parks or open spaces. Open space is an important part of any new development, but Planning staff concurs that public open space can fill that need when it is nearby and accessible to a property. The updated proposal eliminated the open space requirements for projects within 800 feet (via the closest reasonable walking path) of a public park or open space. MAY 2025 UPDATES A complete summary of the final proposal is included in Staff’s memo for the Planning Commission’s continued May 14, 2025, public hearing. Maintain both the RMF-35 and RMF-45 Zoning Districts The original Multi-family Merger proposal combined the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts into a single RMF-45 zoning district. In response to feedback from the Planning Commission and the public, staff revised the proposal to maintain two separate districts. Except for maximum height for certain building forms, the regulations for both districts are essentially the same. Urban Houses, Two-Family Dwellings, and Rowhouses all have a maximum height of 35 feet in both proposed districts. The maximum height for Cottage Developments is also the same in both districts, capped at 23 feet. On the other hand, multi-family and non-residential building forms do not have the same maximum height in both districts. They are permitted to be as tall as 45 feet in the RMF-45 district and limited to 35 feet in the RMF-35 district. Identify Properties that Need a Change in Zoning As directed by the Planning Commission, Planning staff reviewed properties on a block-by-block basis to identify where a different zoning district could be a better fit. They focused on properties in the RMF-35 zoning district with a higher land use designation in an associated adopted neighborhood plan. Naming conventions for Future Land Use Maps can vary between plans; however, for the most part, staff identified properties with a designation of Medium/High Mixed Use or higher. Ultimately, staff identified 23 properties with land use designations that recommended increased zoning intensity. Maps identifying each property are located in Exhibit 4. Other Changes to the Proposal Splitting the proposal back into two districts required Planning staff to make additional adjustments. Since the original proposal only included the RMF-45 zoning district, references to the RMF-35 district were removed. Those have been reincorporated. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 9 Planning staff also clarified the unit bonuses. The revised proposal clarifies that units used to qualify for the bonus do not all need to be located within the same building. Multiple units within multiple structures (i.e., three separate cottages in an existing cottage development) may be preserved to qualify for the unit density bonus. Finally, based on direction from Legal staff, projects that qualify for unit bonuses must have a restrictive covenant recorded on the affected property by the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office. The proposal also includes the necessary terms for those restrictive covenants. PUBLIC PROCESS PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EFFORTS The Planning Division has prioritized equitable and accessible public participation throughout its efforts. To facilitate this, an interactive website (StoryMap) was created as a central hub to access information on the proposal. All public notice requirements in Utah Code and City Code were adhered to, with every affected property owner receiving a specific notice with the required information. All occupants were also notified, as were all occupants and owners within 300 feet of a property that was subject to the changes. The following is a schedule of City-wide early engagement efforts by Planning staff: • December 11, 2024 – The project Storymap was launched • December 11, 2024 – Recognized Organizations were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations • December 12, 2024 – Focus group with small-scale and affordable housing developers • December 23, 2024 – Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the affected properties were provided early notification of the proposal and the March 12, 2025, Planning Commission hearing date. • January 8, 2025 – Public notice signs advertising the proposal and the March 12, 2025, public hearing were posted at all Salt Lake City Public Library branches • January 22, 2025 – General Community Open House at City Hall Additionally, to more efficiently and effectively engage with residents and property owners, Planning staff worked with Community Councils to connect with their established neighborhood networks. The following is a list of Community Council meetings and events where staff gave a presentation, held an open house, or provided both. • January 6, 2025 – East Central Community Council Executive Board Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Downtown Alliance Development Committee Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Central City Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 8, 2025 – Sugar House Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 15, 2025 – Capitol Hill Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 16, 2025 – Liberty Wells Community Council Open House and Presentation • January 23, 2025 – East Liberty Park Community Organization Presentation • February 13, 2025 – East Central Community Council Community Resource Fair Open House and Presentation • March 5, 2025 – Greater Avenues Community Council Presentation PUBLIC FEEDBACK Through the numerous public engagement events and the initial briefings on the proposal to the Historic Landmark Commission (at the meeting on February 6, 2025) and the Planning PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 10 Commission (at their meeting on February 12, 2025), planning staff identified several key themes. They are discussed below 1. Demolition of Existing Housing A common concern raised by the public was that increasing housing allowances could lead to the demolition of existing homes, especially those that may be older or more affordable, to make room for larger, more expensive developments. This is a valid issue and has shaped how staff approached the proposal. While the current RMF zoning districts are intended to permit multifamily housing, in practice, very few lots meet the requirements for its construction. In RMF- 35 and RMF-45 zones, most lots are too small to allow more than a duplex or triplex. Even in RMF-45, only about 53 properties can currently achieve a density of 30 units per acre, which is well below the intended goal of around 43 units per acre set by neighborhood plans. While these changes would allow more units on some lots, many existing multifamily buildings already have more units than would be permitted under the new rules. This means there is less incentive to demolish these buildings, even if the land becomes more valuable. The following were included in the proposal in an attempt to discourage demolition further and prevent displacement: • A 110-foot maximum lot width would limit land assembly for large-scale developments. • Unit bonuses are offered for projects that add housing without demolishing existing structures. • The Building Preservation Incentives, adopted earlier, are also included. These offer benefits such as reduced parking requirements and waived density caps when older buildings are preserved and renovated. • About 37% of all affected lots are in local historic districts, where demolition is more challenging and requires special approval. State and federal historic tax credits also encourage rehabilitation over replacement. Still, staff recognizes that some demolition will happen, as that decision ultimately lies with property owners. The proposal aims to mitigate that impact while still accommodating additional housing. 2. Affordability and Attainability of New Housing Another concern linked to demolition is that the housing replacing older buildings may be unaffordable to current residents. This is a common concern with zoning changes that allow for more development, especially when new buildings tend to be more expensive to rent or buy. It is important to note that housing prices are already rising due to demand outpacing supply. Without any change, this trend is expected to continue. The proposed updates to the RMF districts aim to The chart above illustrates how much the proposed minimum lot area changes would impact the affected properties' development potential. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 11 accommodate more housing, particularly smaller units, which are generally more affordable to construct and own. While zoning changes alone cannot guarantee deeply affordable housing, increasing the overall number of units available helps reduce pressure on the market. With more units to choose from, competition for any single unit decreases. This helps stabilize prices over time and gives households at more income levels a better chance to find housing that fits their needs. The proposal helps address affordability in three main ways: • Makes it easier to build more housing across a range of lot sizes. • Encourages the construction of smaller units, which typically cost less. • Preserves existing buildings where possible, reducing displacement of current residents. 3. Scale of New Development Some residents, especially in areas zoned RMF-35, raised concerns about the size of new buildings that could result from these changes. In response, several guardrails are built into the proposal to manage scale and preserve the feel of existing neighborhoods. Key limits include: • 110-foot maximum lot width to prevent very large developments. • Design standards to guide the look and form of new buildings. • A cap of 20 units per building, which is roughly the size of a traditional four-story walk-up. • Further, in response to scale concerns, the original proposal to allow 55-foot-tall buildings with affordable housing or preservation incentives was removed from the proposal. To reach the 20-unit threshold, a developer would need a lot of space, at least 15,000 square feet. Only about 13.7% of affected properties (299 lots) are large enough to meet that size requirement, and that’s before accounting for existing buildings or site constraints. This balanced approach allows for some growth while still keeping larger-scale buildings limited to specific sites that can support them. COMMISSION BRIEFINGS AND HEARINGS February 2025 Briefings Planning Staff held briefings on the initial proposal with the Historic Landmark Commission (HLC) on February 6, 2025, and with the Planning Commission (PC) on February 12, 2025. Both commissions provided general feedback, with concerns that generally aligned with those of the community. The Historic Landmark Commission had particular concerns about new development within Local Historic Districts. Planning staff assured them that new development and any demolitions of contributing structures would require HLC review. The illustration above show how a limited the supply of housing for all incomes in a community makes it unattainable for lower-income residents. PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 12 March 2025 Planning Commission Hearing The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposal on March 12, 2025. The Commission’s response to staff’s updated proposal was mixed. Specifically, there were scale concerns about the proposed 45-foot height in neighborhoods zoned RMF-35, especially within neighborhoods with relatively larger lots that could see an increase in development pressure. Concerns were also raised regarding individual properties in either district located within neighborhoods that consist primarily of single-family zoning. Other Commission members were more supportive and suggested only minor tweaks, such as setback requirements for larger building forms, including multifamily and non-residential buildings. Some commissioners expressed full support for the original proposal. In their motion, the Commission directed staff to maintain the two districts (RMF-35 and RMF- 45) and identify properties that may be appropriate for an increase (from RMF-35 to RMF-45) or decrease (from RMF-35 to RMF-30) in zoning intensity. Planning Staff has incorporated the Commission’s direction as much as possible. Specific changes are outlined in the “Updates to the Proposal” section of this report. May 2025 Planning Commission Hearing Between the March 12, 2025, Public Hearing and the continued public hearing on May 14, 2025, Planning staff updated the proposal to reflect the Planning Commission’s direction. In particular, the revised proposal maintained the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts and their associated maximum height. Additionally, staff identified RMF-35 properties that are suitable for rezoning to RMF-45. Following staff’s presentation and the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve the proposal. Public Hearing Comments Public comments during the two public hearings were mixed, with opinions roughly evenly divided between support and opposition to the proposal (minutes for the March 12, 2025, public hearing can be found here, and minutes for the May 14, 2025, public hearing can be found here). Those who opposed the proposal raised concerns about the potential changes to affected neighborhoods. Specific issues mentioned by the public included parking, loss of sunlight and solar access, alterations in neighborhood character, possible decreases in property values, and the need for appropriate setbacks between taller and shorter buildings. Supporters of the proposal highlighted several reasons the changes were necessary. They echoed Planning staff’s concerns about the ineffectiveness of current regulations. Many expressed worries about school closures, low-quality housing, and a competitive rental market due to documented shortages in housing, all of which have been exacerbated by existing policies and regulations. They also pointed out the proximity of affected neighborhoods to transit, jobs, and downtown, emphasizing the need to expand housing opportunities in these areas. Advocates countered the argument that new development would displace naturally occurring affordable housing. One commenter reiterated staff’s earlier point that new housing development helps to alleviate demand for existing units, thereby supporting affordability. Additional public comments received after the public hearings are located in Exhibit 3. Planning Commission Records 1. February 6, 2025 – Historic Landmark Commission Briefing a. Agenda b. Minutes PLNPCM2024-01388 – Updated Multi-Family Merger 13 c. Staff Memo d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 2. February 12, 2025 – Planning Commission Briefing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Memo d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 3. March 12, 2025 – First Planning Commission Public Hearing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Report d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording 4. May 14, 2025 – Second Planning Commission Public Hearing a. Agenda b. Minutes c. Staff Report d. Presentation Slides e. Video Recording EXHIBITS: 1. Zoning Map Amendment Ordinance 2. Zoning Text Amendment Ordinances 3. Public Comments Received After Staff Reports Were Published 4. Maps identifying properties to be rezoned from RMF-35 to RMF-45 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels of property from RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District in connection with revised regulations for such districts) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to multiple parcels Citywide as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, to rezone select properties from the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district to the RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2024-01388. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on May 14, 2025, on a petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code related to the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) and RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) zoning districts and establish new regulations pertaining to those districts; and WHEREAS, in order to conform with the future land use maps of the neighborhood plans implicated by these zoning districts, the parcels identified in this ordinance needed to be rezoned; WHEREAS, at its May 14, 2025, meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a position recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the property depicted in Exhibit A and listed by Tax ID number 2 in Exhibit B shall be rezoned from the RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district to the RMF-45 (Moderate Density Multi-Family) district. In the event that a conflict arises between Exhibit A and Exhibit B, Exhibit A shall control. It is not the intent of this Section 1 to modify existing district boundaries (i.e. the physical location between or on parcels where a district boundary lies), only to change the assigned zoning district of the properties subject to this Section 1. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. Ordinance Rezoning Properties for RMF35/45 Amendments_v1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 22, 2025 3 Exhibit “A” Zoning Map Amendment - Depiction NORTH TEMPLE ST 1300 S 13 0 0 E MA I N S T RE D W O O D R D ST A T E S T HI G H L A N D DR 2700 S 90 0 W 600 N 400 S INDIANA AVE 800 S 30 0 W 1700 S 2100 S 40 0 W 90 0 E 11 0 0 E VIC T O R Y RD RE D W O O D R D 21 0 0 E SOUTH TEMPLE ST 500 S FOO T H ILL DR 1000 N 100 S FO O T H I L L D R 90 0 W 600 S 70 0 E BEC K S T 200 S 700 N SUNNYSIDE AVE WE S T T E M P L E S T 500 S PAR L E Y S W A Y 500 S MAR IOCA P E C C H I DR 22 0 0 W 2100 N CALIFORNIA AVE 3300 S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Map Number RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 3000 6000 Feet Zoning Map Amendment - Map Index 7/22/2025 280 N JO R D A N RIV E R PK Y NA V A J O S T PU E B L O S T 13 3 0 W 300 S INDIANSUMM E R DR 200 S 11 0 0 W 200 N NORTH TEMPLE ST 12 8 0 W DE M P S EY LN 180 N MO N T G O M E R Y S T 240 N EM E R Y S T CO N C O R D S T CH E Y E N N E S T FA L L S T 400 S EUCLID AVE 12 0 0 W PIERPONT AVE 13 0 0 W 200 S MOTOR AVE BO T H W E L L S T GL E N D A L E S T 13 0 0 W IOLA AVE 14 0 0 W I-80 EB I-15 NB RAMP 13 2 0 W 13 4 0 W 15 0 0 W FO S S S T I-80 WB FWY I-80 W BREDWOODOFF RAMP CO R N E L L S T 14 6 0 W I-80 EB REDWOOD ON RAMP I-80 EB FW Y RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 1 7/22/2025 ST A T E S T 300 S MA I N S T 200 N EASTCA P I T OL ST CA N Y O N R D 4TH AVE ORPHEUM AVE MA I N S T 400 S 200 S EXCHANGE PL 100 S SOUTH TEMPLE ST NORTH TEMPLE ST 3RD AVE HILLSIDE AVE 2ND AVE 1ST AVE CA N Y O N ( E ) R D 20 0 E ALM O ND ST 30 0 W WE S T T E M P L E S T 20 0 W RE G E N T S T CA N Y O N S I D E L N 100 S PO P L A R C T DE L M A R C T WA Y N E C T MA R G U E R I T E C T SH E L M E R D I N E C T QU I N C E S T QU A R TE R RO W VINEST FL O R A L S T PL U M A L Y GALLIVAN AVE PIERPONT AVE SOCIAL HALL AVE MARKET ST ED I S O N S T RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 2 7/22/2025 SOUTH TEMPLE ST 100 S 200 S 300 S 400 S ARNOLD PL 80 0 E 90 0 E ST R O N G S C T MARKEA AVE 4TH AVE 3RD AVE 2ND AVE 1ST AVE BUENO AVE RE E V E S T E R ISOM PL H S T 60 0 E 50 0 E DE N V E R S T 40 0 E CLAWSON PL LINDEN AVE BA N K S C T IV A N C T HE A T H E R S T C S T WE S T C T D S T E S T 70 0 E F S T G S T I S T J S T K S T L S T M S T ALAMEDA AVE LA K E R C T HA W K E S C T SLADE PL VI N C E N T C T CHAPMAN PL HANOVER PL DO O L E Y C T WI N D S O R S T BU R N S S T MENLO AVE RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 3 7/22/2025 500 S 600 S 700 S 800 S 900 S 90 0 W 40 0 W 50 0 W I-1 5 SB 90 0 SONRAM P I-1 5 NB 90 0 SOFF RAMP 60 0 W 80 0 W 700 S 600 S 500 S PIONEER CIR I- 1 5 S B F W Y I-1 5 S B C O L L E C T O R R A M P JE R E M Y S T I- 1 5 N B F W Y 600 FRTG 50 0 W 70 0 W 76 5 W MONTAGUE AVE MEAD AVE DALTON AVE 70 0 W PACIFIC AVE GENESEE AVE PO S T S T FAYETTE AVE 500 FRTG 46 5 W ARAPAHOE AVE FAYETTE AVE MONTAGUE AVE WO O D B I N E S T JE R E M Y S T I-1 5 N B I - 8 0 W B R A M P I-1 5 NB 40 0 SOF F RA MP I-1 5 S B 4 0 0 S O N R A M P I-80 WB 500SONRAMP I-8 0 EBI-15 SB R A M P I- 1 5 NB 60 0 SOFF RAM P I-8 0 EB 600 SOFF RAM P I-1 5 SB 50 0 S O N R A M P RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 4 7/22/2025 20 0 W 900 S BROOKLYN AVE 800 S 500 S 700 S 600 S 20 0 E ST A T E S T 30 0 W EARDLEY PL MA I N S T PL E A S A N T C T WE S T T E M P L E S T BAILEY PL MA J O R S T BELMONT AVE MEAD AVE LOWELL AVE UPTON PL GREGORY PL MONTROSE AVE WASATCH PL ST R I N G F E L L O W C T MA J O R S T MO R T E N S E N C T COLFAX AVEPORTOLA AVE HUBBARD AVE ORCHARD PL JE F F E R S O N S T WA S H I N G T O N S T HERBERT AVE WILLIAMS AVE RO B E R T A S T ED I S O N S T RI C H A R D S S T FAYETTE AVE I-15SB900SONRAM P WES T TE M P L EFR T G I-15 NB 900 S OFF RAMP RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 5 7/22/2025 MA I N S T WE S T T E M P L E S T 20 0 E 20 0 E 1700 S ANDREW AVE ST A T E S T 1300 S 1400 S BROWNING AVE KENSINGTON AVE 30 0 W 20 0 W HIGH AVE LUCY AVE PAXTON AVE ED I S O N S T MA J O R S T WA S H I N G T O N S T RO B E R T A S T HARRIS AVE WILSON AVE MA J O R S T FO U L G E R S T RO B E R T A S T JE F F E R S O N S T 1630 S GOLTZ AVE FREMONT AVE MERRIMAC AVE VAN BUREN AVE CLEVELAND AVE QUAYLE AVE COATSVILLE AVE WOOD AVE BRYAN AVE HARRISON AVE HARVARD AVE RI C H A R D S S T RI C H A R D S S T JE F F E R S O N S T EDITH AVE KELSEY AVE HAMPTON AVE YALE AVE HERBERT AVE PARAMOUNT AVE BOULEVARD GARDENS ST RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 6 7/22/2025 15 0 0 E PRINCETON AVE 14 0 0 E HARVARD AVE 11 0 0 E 13 0 0 E 10 0 0 E YALE AVE BRYAN AVE MILTON AVE 1700 S MC C L E L L A N D S T 14 0 0 E 1300 S WILSON AVE BLAINE AVE PRINCETON AVE 12 0 0 E UI N T A H C I R LA I R D C I R LAIRD AVE NO R M A N D I E C I R 10 0 0 E WILSON AVE EMERSON AVE HARVARD AVE DO U G L A S S T YALE AVE HARRISON AVE LOGAN AVE FI L M O R E S T ROOSEVELT AVE BLAINE AVE SHERMAN AVE BROWNING AVE KENSINGTON AVE LOGAN AVE WOOD AVE RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 7 7/22/2025 ELM AVE 2100 S HI G H L A N D D R 11 0 0 E HOLLYWOOD AVE RAMONA AVE DOWNINGTON AVE WILSON AVE 13 0 0 E PARKWAY AVE 12 0 0 E DO U G L A S S T EL I Z A B E T H S T 10 0 0 E 15 0 0 E MC C L E L L A N D ST 14 0 0 E I-80 EB FWY SUGARHOUSEPARK SOUTH RD GARFIELD AVE SUGARMONT DR WILMINGTON AVE I-80 WB FWY VI E W S T SU G A R H O U S E PAR K WESTRD EL I Z A B E T H S T SIMPS O NAVE DOWNINGTON AVE I-80 WB FWY WESTMINSTER AVE FI L M O R E S T 15 0 0 E DE A R B O R N S T CH A D W I C K S T BE V E R L Y S T WILSON AVE AL D E N S T WARNOCK AVE 13 0 0 F R T G E GARFIELD AVE RAMONA AVE HOLLYWOOD AVE REDONDO AVE SUGARHOUSE PARK NORTH RD 11 0 0 E ASHTON AVE I-80 WB 1 3 0 0 E OFF RAMP DO U G L A S S T WESTMINSTER AVE ALLEN PARK DR I-80 EB 1300 E O F F R A M P DRIGGS AVE STRINGHAM AVE SUGARHOUSE PARK MIDDLE RD I-80 EB 1300 E ON RAMP RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 8 7/22/2025 2700 S WHITLOCK AVE AN G E L ITA CT 11 0 0 E HIG H L A N D D R 3000 S JASPER CIR CLAYBOURNE AVE ZENITH CIR HU D S O N C I R FO R E S T D A L E C I R CAT O N WAY EL I Z A B ET H ST STRATFORD AVE BRICKYARDRD JU D I T H S T RI C H MOND ST DO U G L A S S T CRANDALL AVE 13 0 0 E ELGIN AVE AUSTIN AVE ZENITH AVE 13 3 5 E ELGINHE I G H T S L N 10 0 0 E CHARLTON AVE HUDSON AVE ATKIN AVE 13 0 0 F R T G E 14 0 0 E 15 0 0 E ATKIN AVE 12 0 0 E WARNOCK AVE BE V E R L Y S T AL D E N S T MALVERN AVE DE A R B O R N S T FI L M O R E S T CRYSTAL AVE CH A D W I C K S T GRAYSTONE WAY MC C L E L L A N D S T 11 7 0 E HUDSON AVE 15 0 0 E RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 10 7/22/2025 STRATFORD AVE 2700 S 20 0 0 E COVE Y V I E W C T CRANDALL CIR YU M A S T ATKIN AVE IM P E R I A L S T MARY DOTT WAY MABEY DR SO N N E T D R ID A C I R PR E ST O N ST STR A T F O R D DR 21 0 0 E CRYSTAL AVE CO N N O R S T HIGHLAND VIEW CIR 17 0 0 E HILLCREST AVE I-80EBFWY PR E S T O N S T 19 0 0 E GR A N D V I E W C I R WE L L I N G T O N S T ME L B O U R N E S T 18 0 0 E KE N W O O D S T PARLEYS TER WHITE AVE BOSHAM LN CLAYBOURNE AVE I-80 W B F W Y RMF-35 to RMF-45 ¯0 300 600 Feet Zoning Map Amendment: Map 11 7/22/2025 4 Exhibit “B” Zoning Map Amendment - Identification by Tax ID Number TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-001-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-002-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-003-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-004-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-005-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-006-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-007-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-008-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-009-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-010-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-011-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-012-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-013-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 207 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-014-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 208 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-015-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-016-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-017-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-018-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-019-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-020-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-021-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 307 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-022-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 308 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-023-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 401 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-024-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 402 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-025-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 403 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-026-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 404 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-027-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 405 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-028-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 406 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-029-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 407 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-030-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 408 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-031-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 501 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 1 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-032-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 502 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-033-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 503 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-034-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 504 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-035-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 505 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-036-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 506 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-037-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 507 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-038-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 508 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-039-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 601 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-040-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 602 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-041-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 603 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-042-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 604 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-043-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 605 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-044-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 701 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-045-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 702 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-046-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 703 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-047-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 704 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-049-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # PENH RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-050-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P6 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-052-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P10 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-053-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P53 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-054-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P12 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-055-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P13 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-056-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P15 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-057-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P17 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-058-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P22 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-059-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P24 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-060-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P25 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-061-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P35 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-062-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P40 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-063-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P47 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-064-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P49 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 2 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 09-31-307-066-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P18 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-067-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # 705 RMF-35 RMF-45 09-31-307-068-0000 8 E HILLSIDE AVE # P9 RMF-35 RMF-45 15-02-306-001-0000 351-363 S CONCORD ST RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-001-0000 1677 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-002-0000 1671 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-03-262-003-0000 1659 W 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-015-0000 665-667 S 900 W RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-016-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-017-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-11-203-018-0000 876 W 700 S RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-004-0000 126 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-005-0000 120 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-12-426-006-0000 134 W MEAD AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 15-13-229-005-0000 1416 S WESTTEMPLE ST RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-284-001-0000 602 E 300 S RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-428-001-0000 321 S 600 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-06-428-002-0000 323 S 600 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-001-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-002-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-003-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-004-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-005-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-006-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-007-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-008-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-009-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-010-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-011-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-012-0000 150 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-013-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 3 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-156-015-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-016-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-017-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-018-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-019-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-020-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-021-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-022-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-023-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-024-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-025-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 13 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-026-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 14 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-027-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 15 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-028-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 16 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-029-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 17 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-030-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 18 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-031-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 19 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-032-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 20 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-033-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 21 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-034-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 22 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-035-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 23 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-036-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 24 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-037-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 1 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-038-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-039-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 3 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-040-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 4 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-041-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 5 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-042-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 6 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-043-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 7 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-044-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 8 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-045-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 9 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 4 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-156-046-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 10 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-047-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 11 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-048-0000 190 E BELMONT AVE # 12 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-050-0000 170 E BELMONT AVE # 2 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-156-051-0000 976 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-307-018-0000 992 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-001-0000 996 S 200 E # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-002-0000 996 S 200 E # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-003-0000 996 S 200 E # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-004-0000 996 S 200 E # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-005-0000 996 S 200 E # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-006-0000 996 S 200 E # 106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-007-0000 996 S 200 E # 107 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-008-0000 996 S 200 E # 108 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-009-0000 996 S 200 E # 109 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-010-0000 996 S 200 E # 110 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-011-0000 996 S 200 E # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-012-0000 996 S 200 E # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-013-0000 996 S 200 E # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-014-0000 996 S 200 E # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-015-0000 996 S 200 E # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-016-0000 996 S 200 E # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-017-0000 996 S 200 E # 207 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-018-0000 996 S 200 E # 208 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-019-0000 996 S 200 E # 209 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-020-0000 996 S 200 E # 210 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-021-0000 996 S 200 E # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-022-0000 996 S 200 E # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-023-0000 996 S 200 E # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-024-0000 996 S 200 E # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-025-0000 996 S 200 E # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 5 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-07-314-026-0000 996 S 200 E # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-027-0000 996 S 200 E # 307 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-028-0000 996 S 200 E # 308 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-029-0000 996 S 200 E # 309 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-030-0000 996 S 200 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-07-314-031-0000 996 S 200 E # 310 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-15-380-022-0000 2243 E 2100 S RMF-35 RMF-45 16-16-352-006-0000 1951 S 1300 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-17-204-032-0000 1418-1426 S 1100 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-17-481-008-0000 1945 S 1300 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-21-479-020-0000 2673 S PRESTON ST RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-002-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1001 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-003-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1002 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-004-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1003 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-005-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1004 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-006-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1005 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-007-0000 1151 E BRICKYARD RD #1006 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-008-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-009-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-010-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-011-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-012-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-013-0000 1149 E BRICKYARD RD #1106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-014-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-015-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-016-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-017-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-018-0000 1145 E BRICKYARD RD #1205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-019-0000 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-020-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-021-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1302 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 6 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-255-022-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-023-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-024-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1305 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-025-0000 1141 E BRICKYARD RD #1306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-026-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1401 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-027-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1402 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-028-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1403 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-029-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1404 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-030-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1405 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-031-0000 1139 E BRICKYARD RD #1406 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-032-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1501 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-033-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1502 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-034-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1503 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-035-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1504 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-036-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1505 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-037-0000 1133 E BRICKYARD RD #1506 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-038-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1601 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-039-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1602 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-040-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1603 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-041-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1604 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-042-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1605 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-043-0000 1125 E BRICKYARD RD #1606 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-044-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1701 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-045-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1702 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-046-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1703 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-047-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1704 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-048-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1705 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-049-0000 1129 E BRICKYARD RD #1706 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-050-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1801 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-051-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1802 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-052-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1803 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 7 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-255-053-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1804 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-054-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1805 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-055-0000 1121 E BRICKYARD RD #1806 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-255-056-0000 1157 E BRICKYARD RD RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-002-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 101 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-003-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 102 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-004-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 103 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-005-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 104 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-006-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 105 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-007-0000 1217 E BRICKYARD RD # 106 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-008-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 201 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-009-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 202 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-010-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 203 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-011-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 204 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-012-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 205 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-013-0000 1227 E BRICKYARD RD # 206 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-014-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 301 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-015-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 302 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-016-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 303 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-017-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 304 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-018-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 305 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-019-0000 1237 E BRICKYARD RD # 306 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-020-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 403 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-021-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 401 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-022-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 402 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-023-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 404 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-024-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 405 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-025-0000 1241 E BRICKYARD RD # 406 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-026-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 501 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-027-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 502 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-028-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 503 RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 8 of 9 TAX ID NUMBER ADDRESS CURRENT ZONE NEW ZONE 16-29-258-029-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 504 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-030-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 505 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-031-0000 1231 E BRICKYARD RD # 506 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-032-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 601 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-033-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 602 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-034-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 603 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-035-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 604 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-036-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 605 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-037-0000 1221 E BRICKYARD RD # 606 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-038-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 701 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-039-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 702 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-040-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 703 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-041-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 704 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-042-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 705 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-043-0000 1181 E BRICKYARD RD # 706 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-044-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 801 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-045-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 802 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-046-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 803 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-047-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 804 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-048-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 805 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-049-0000 1167 E BRICKYARD RD # 806 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-050-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 901 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-051-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 902 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-052-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 903 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-053-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 904 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-054-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 905 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-258-055-0000 1155 E BRICKYARD RD # 906 RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-278-021-0000 3025 S 1100 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-003-0000 1006 E WELBY AVE RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-004-0000 3103 S 1000 E RMF-35 RMF-45 16-29-401-005-0000 3111 S 1000 E RMF-35 RMF-45 Exhibit B - Zoning Map Amendment – Identification by Tax ID Number 9 of 9 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A.24.130 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential 45 Districts Petition No.: PLNPC2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 to remove RMF-35 language • Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 to replace RMF-35 with new RMF-35 & RMF-45 Ordinance • Amends 21A.24.140 to remove RMF-45 language Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends Chapter 21A.24.130 as follows: 1 21A.24.130: RMF-35 and RMF-45 MODERATE DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2 DISTRICTS 3 A. Purpose Statement: The RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential Districts 4 are intended to provide an environment in the city suitable for a variety of residential building forms 5 that are moderate in scale, up to a height of 35 feet in the RMF-35 district and 45 feet in the RMF-45 6 district, with a density based on the land use policies identified in the general plan. The districts serve 7 as a transition between low-density neighborhoods and areas with greater land-use intensity. The 8 primary intent of both districts is to enable infill development, encourage incremental construction of 9 affordable and attainable housing, and support the character of established residential neighborhoods. 10 The form-based standards for the districts are intended to promote a variety of housing options. These 11 districts are meant to facilitate an engaging pedestrian experience, support nearby commercial uses, 12 and encourage sustainable modes of transportation. 13 B. Allowed Uses: Land uses shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use based on the land use 14 tables for each listed district in Chapter 21A.33. Any permitted or conditional use shall also be 15 limited by any specific provision in this chapter or as determined by the building type definitions 16 found in 21A.62.060. 17 1. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures shall be allowed subject to the 18 requirements of 21A.36.020, 21A.36.030, and 21A.40 of this title and any other provisions that 19 specifically apply to accessory uses and structures that may be found in this title. 20 C. General Provisions: 21 1. Building Height: 22 a. Maximum: Building height maximums are based on building forms listed in Section 23 21A.24.130.I. 24 b. Measurement: Building height in this chapter shall be measured from finished grade. 25 2. Yard and Setback: 26 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/16/25_____________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 a. General Yard Applicability: When a development includes multiple lots, the minimum 27 required yards may apply to the perimeter of the development rather than to individual lots. 28 b. Front and Corner Side Yard Exceptions: 29 (1) Adjacent Building Exception: A required minimum front or corner side yard may be 30 reduced to equal an abutting lot's front or corner side yard if the yard area is located along 31 the same block face. 32 (2) Curb Distance Exception: No minimum setback is required for the front or corner side 33 yard if the respective lot line is more than 20 feet from the street curb face. 34 c. Side or Rear Yard Abutting an Alley: Half the width of an abutting alley may be counted 35 toward a required side or rear yard. 36 3. Lot Size Provisions: 37 a. Lot Width Maximum: The width of a new lot shall not exceed 110 feet. Where more than 38 one lot is created, the combined lot width of abutting lots within a new subdivision, including 39 area between lots, shall not exceed 110 feet. 40 b. Lot Area Requirement Exception: No minimum lot area is required for utility buildings and 41 structures or for allowed uses that do not involve the construction of a principal building, 42 such as parks and open space. 43 4. Open Space Area Requirements: Open space areas may include landscaped yards, patios, 44 dining areas, common balconies, rooftop gardens, and other similar outdoor living spaces. Private 45 balconies, required parking lot landscaping, or required perimeter parking lot landscaping shall 46 not be counted toward the minimum open space area requirement. When required by the building 47 form standards in this chapter, the following open space standards shall apply: 48 a. Common Open Space Areas: A common open space area is an outdoor space shared by all 49 dwelling units within a development that meets the minimum size requirement specified in an 50 applicable building form table. For developments that involve subdividing a site into multiple 51 lots, common open space areas may use the entire development area, provided each dwelling 52 unit has legally established access to the common open space area. At least 50% of the 53 required common open space shall be contiguous and include the following: 54 (1) A minimum of 33% live vegetation; 55 (2) A minimum width of 6 feet; 56 (3) and at least two of the following: 57 (A) A bench for every 250 square feet of common open space area; 58 (B) An outdoor amenity intended to provide outdoor recreation and leisure opportunities, 59 which may include playgrounds, seating areas, gardens, sports courts, or similar 60 amenities intended to promote outdoor activity; or 61 (C) A shade structure or tree with a minimum spread of 20 feet at mature height for every 62 250 square feet of common open space area. If a tree is provided, the tree canopy at 63 maturity may count toward the required minimum area of vegetation. 64 b. Personal Open Space Areas: A personal open space area is a private area that is accessible 65 only to its respective dwelling unit. Each personal open space area shall be separated from 66 other areas by a fence, hedge, or other physical barrier to distinguish it as private. When 67 required, the minimum personal open space area shall apply to each dwelling unit in a 68 development. Each personal open space area shall: 69 (1) Contain at least one shade area. Shade may include a tree, pergola, gazebo, or other 70 similar structure designed to provide shade to the area. Shade structures may encroach 71 into a required yard provided they are located at least one foot from all lot lines; 72 3 (2) Have no more than 50% coverage of impervious surfaces; 73 (3) Not be located within a required front yard; and 74 (4) Have a minimum width of 6 feet. 75 c. Proximity to Public Parks: The open space required by a building form standard does not 76 apply when the subject property is within 800 feet of a public park or open space, as 77 measured along the closest reasonable walking path. 78 5. Public Street Frontage: 79 a. Buildings Without Frontage: A lot may contain principal buildings without public street 80 frontage provided that: 81 (1) At least one principal building on the lot has public street frontage and meets the 82 minimum front yard setback, 83 (2) Each building has legally established access to a public street, and 84 (3) Each ground-floor dwelling unit of the Row House, Urban House, Two-Family, and 85 Cottage Development forms shall include an entry feature allowed by 21A.37.050, 86 regardless of street frontage. 87 b. Lots without Frontage: For the purpose of this provision, individual dwellings may be on 88 their own lot, including within a condominium development. Lots without public street 89 frontage, used for individual dwelling units or buildings, are allowed subject to a preliminary 90 subdivision plat process and recording a final subdivision plat that: 91 (1) Documents that new lots have adequate access to a public street by way of easements or a 92 shared driveway and 93 (2) Includes a disclosure of private infrastructure costs for any shared infrastructure 94 associated with the new lot(s) per Section 21A.55.110 of this title and all other 95 requirements therein. 96 6. Midblock Walkways: When identified in the general plan, midblock walkways are subject 97 to the following requirements: 98 a. Width: The midblock walkway shall meet the minimum width requirements established 99 in the applicable plan. If no minimum width is provided, it shall be 6 feet. 100 b. Encroachments: The following building encroachments are permitted in an outdoor 101 midblock walkway: 102 (1) Balconies: All balconies must be located at the third story or above; 103 (2) Building overhangs and associated cantilever: These coverings shall be located no 104 lower than 9 feet above the level of the sidewalk and may project up to 6 feet; 105 (3) Other architectural element(s) not listed above that offer refuge from weather and/or 106 provide publicly accessible usable space, projecting up to 1 foot into the midblock 107 walkway. 108 D. Unit Density Bonus: Bonus dwelling units may be granted when an existing principal building is 109 retained as part of a development that adds at least one additional dwelling unit pursuant to the 110 following: 111 1. Two bonus dwelling units of any building type may be granted for retaining an existing structure 112 that contains one or two dwelling units, or retaining two dwelling units within separate buildings 113 on a site. 114 2. Four bonus dwelling units of any type may be granted for retaining an existing building 115 containing three or more dwelling units or retaining three or more dwelling units within multiple 116 buildings on a site. 117 3. A bonus dwelling unit may be added within or attached to an existing principal building or as a 118 separate building, provided that all other applicable zoning requirements are met. Bonus units are 119 not subject to minimum lot area requirements. 120 4 4. The addition of a bonus dwelling unit to an existing principal building does not change the 121 building type of the existing building. 122 5. Bonus dwelling units are exempt from minimum off-street parking requirements. 123 6. Bonus dwelling units are exempt from open space area requirements. 124 7. The exterior building walls and roofline of the existing principal building must be retained to 125 obtain a bonus dwelling unit. Additional stories are permitted and existing architectural elements 126 may be modified provided they meet applicable zoning or historic preservation standards. 127 8. A density bonus may only be requested with a building permit application for development that 128 meets the minimum lot area requirements. 129 9. Any density bonus granted shall be documented through a restrictive covenant, the form of which 130 shall be approved by the city attorney. The restrictive covenant shall be recorded on the property 131 with the Salt Lake County Recorder prior to final inspection of the bonus units. The restrictive 132 covenant shall run with the land and shall provide for the following, without limitation: 133 a. Indicate that bonus dwelling units were established by retaining existing structures on a site. 134 b. Guarantee that the building(s) containing the unit(s) used to qualify for the bonus units shall 135 not be demolished unless the associated bonus units are also demolished; and 136 c. Establish that the terms of the restrictive covenant are enforceable by the city or, pursuant to 137 Utah Code Section 10-9a-802 (or its successor), any adversely affected party, and that in any 138 such enforcement action the court shall award the prevailing party its attorneys' fees. 139 E. Other Applicable Regulations: The following additional regulations apply to properties within 140 this district: 141 1. 21A.33 Land Use Tables 142 2. 21A.24.010 General Provisions for Residential Districts 143 3. 21A.36 General Provisions 144 4. 21A.37 Design Standards 145 5. 21A.38 Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures 146 6. 21A.40 Accessory Uses, Buildings, and Structures 147 7. 21A.42 Temporary Uses 148 8. 21A.44 Off Street Parking, Mobility, and Loading 149 9. 21A.46 Signs 150 10. 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers 151 F. Building Types, Forms and Standards: Allowed building forms shall be determined based on the 152 definitions in 21A.62.060. Standards for each allowed building form are listed in the Building Form 153 Standards tables below. 154 1. Urban House and Two-Family Building Form Standards: 155 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.1 156 Building Regulation Regulation for Building Forms: Urban House and Two-Family Dwelling Maximum: 35 feet Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Maximum: 2 5 2. Cottage Development Building Form Standards: 157 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.2 158 3. Row House Building Form Standards: 159 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.3 160 Building Coverage Maximum: Landscape Buffer Attached Garage (50%) of the width of the front facade of the building. of multiple garage doors, the sum of the widths of each garage door plus the width of any intervening wall elements between garage doors. No attached garage shall be constructed forward of the "front line of the building" (as defined in section 21A.62.040 of this title). Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Cottage Development Maximum: 23 feet Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Minimum: Maximum: 1 Building Size 850 square feet of gross floor area per Cottage Open Space Area Minimum Landscape Buffers Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Row House Maximum: 35 feet Minimum: Minimum: Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- 6 4. Multi-Family Residential Building Form Standards: 161 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.4 162 5. Non-residential Building Form Standards: 163 TABLE 21A.24.130.F.4 164 Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R-2, FR, or SR zoning district lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Maximum: 6 Open Space Area Minimum: Landscape Buffers Attached Garages Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Multi-Family Residential Maximum: Maximum: Minimum: Minimum: Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- the side lot line, the minimum is 10 feet unless a street or alley separates the Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R- lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Maximum: 20 Open Space Area Minimum: developments with 3 dwelling units, a minimum of 200 square feet of Landscape Buffers Building Regulation Regulation for Building Form: Non-Residential Maximum: Maximum: Minimum: Minimum: 7 165 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District 166 is to provide an environment suitable for a variety of moderate density housing types, including single-167 family, two-family, and multi-family dwellings with a maximum height of thirty five feet (35'). This 168 district is appropriate in areas where the applicable Master Plan policies recommend a density of less than 169 thirty (30) dwelling units per acre. This district includes other uses that are typically found in a multi-170 family residential neighborhood of this density for the purpose of serving the neighborhood. Uses are 171 intended to be compatible with the existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The standards for the 172 district are intended to provide for safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and 173 compatible development patterns and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood. 174 B. Uses: Uses in the RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District, as specified in 175 section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of this title, 176 are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21A.24.010 of this chapter and this 177 section. 178 C. Minimum Lot Area And Lot Width: The minimum lot areas and lot widths required in this district 179 are as follows: 180 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Multi-family dwellings (3 through 11 units) 9,000 square feet1 80 feet Multi-family dwellings (12 or more units) 26,000 square feet1 80 feet Municipal service uses, including City utility uses No minimum No minimum Natural open space and conservation areas, public No minimum No minimum Public pedestrian pathways, trails and greenways No minimum No minimum Public/private utility transmission wires, lines, No minimum No minimum Single-family attached dwellings (3 or more) 3,000 square feet per unit Interior: 22 feet Corner: 32 feet Single-family detached dwellings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Interior Side Yard Minimum: When the interior side yard abuts an R-1, R- the side lot line, the minimum is 10 feet unless a street or alley separates the Rear Yard Minimum: When the rear yard abuts an R-1, R- lot line, the minimum is 15 feet unless a street or alley separates the Minimum: Open Space Area Minimum: 15% of the lot area shall be common or private open space Landscape Buffers 8 Utility substations and buildings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Other permitted or conditional uses as listed in 5,000 square feet 50 feet Qualifying provisions: 181 1. 9,000 square feet for 3 units, plus 2,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to and 182 including 11 units. 26,000 square feet for 12 units, plus 1,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit 183 up to 1 acre. For developments greater than 1 acre, 1,500 square feet for each dwelling unit is required. 184 D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height permitted in this district is thirty five 185 feet (35'). 186 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 187 1. Front Yard: Twenty feet (20'). 188 2. Corner Side Yard: Ten feet (10'). 189 3. Interior Side Yard: 190 a. Single-family detached and two-family dwellings: 191 (1) Interior lots: Four feet (4') on one side and ten feet (10') on the other. 192 (2) Corner lots: Four feet (4'). 193 b. Single-family attached: No yard is required, however, if one is provided it shall not be less than 194 four feet (4'). 195 c. Twin home dwelling: No yard is required along one side lot line while a ten foot (10') yard is 196 required on the other. 197 d. Multi-family dwellings: 198 (1) Interior lots: Side yard shall be at least ten feet (10'). 199 e. All other permitted and conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on each side. 200 4. Rear Yard: Twenty five percent (25%) of the lot depth, but not less than twenty feet (20') and need 201 not exceed twenty five feet (25'). 202 5. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located 203 in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B, "Obstructions In Required Yards", 204 of this title. 205 6. Existing Yards: For buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required yard shall be no 206 greater than the established setback line of the existing building. 207 F. Required Landscape Yards: The front yard, corner side and, for interior multi-family lots, one of the 208 interior side yards shall be maintained as landscape yards. 209 G. Maximum Building Coverage: 210 1. Single-Family Detached: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 211 exceed forty five percent (45%) of the lot area. 212 2. Single-Family Attached Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings 213 shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 214 3. Two-Family And Twin Home Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory 215 buildings shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the lot area. 216 4. Multi-Family Dwellings: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 217 exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 218 5. Existing Dwellings: For dwellings existing on April 12, 1995, the coverage of such existing 219 buildings shall be considered legally conforming. 220 9 6. Nonresidential Land Uses: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall not 221 exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 222 H. Landscape Buffers: Where a lot abuts a lot in a single-family or two-family residential district, a 223 landscape buffer shall be provided in accordance with chapter 21A.48 of this title. (Ord. 56-24, 2024: 224 Ord. 46-17, 2017: Ord. 66-13, 2013: Ord. 12-11, 2011: Ord. 62-09 §§ 6, 9, 2009: Ord. 61-09 § 7, 2009: 225 Ord. 35-99 §§ 18, 19, 1999: Ord. 26-95 § 2(12-12), 1995) 226 227 2. Amends Chapter 21A.24.140 as follows: 228 21A.24.140: Reserved RMF-45 MODERATE/HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 229 DISTRICT 230 231 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential 232 District is to provide an environment suitable for multi-family dwellings of a moderate/high density with 233 a maximum building height of forty five feet (45'). This district is appropriate in areas where the 234 applicable Master Plan policies recommend a density of less than forty three (43) dwelling units per acre. 235 This district includes other uses that are typically found in a multi-family residential neighborhood of this 236 density for the purpose of serving the neighborhood. Such uses are designed to be compatible with the 237 existing scale and intensity of the neighborhood. The standards for the district are intended to provide for 238 safe and comfortable places to live and play, promote sustainable and compatible development patterns 239 and to preserve the existing character of the neighborhood. 240 241 B. Uses: Uses in the RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District, as specified 242 in section 21A.33.020, "Table Of Permitted And Conditional Uses For Residential Districts", of this title, 243 are permitted subject to the general provisions set forth in section 21A.24.010 of this chapter and this 244 section. 245 246 C. Minimum Lot Area And Lot Width: The minimum lot areas and lot widths required in this district 247 are as follows: 248 249 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Land Use Minimum Lot Area Multi-family dwellings (3 to 14 units) 9,000 square feet1 80 feet Multi-family dwellings (15 or more) 21,000 square feet1 80 feet No minimum No minimum No minimum No minimum Places of worship less than 4 acres in size 12,000 square feet 140 feet Public pedestrian pathways, trails and greenways No minimum No minimum No minimum No minimum 10 Single-family attached dwellings 3,000 square feet per unit Interior: 22 feet Corner: 32 feet Single-family detached dwellings 5,000 square feet 50 feet Utility substations and buildings 5,000 square feet 50 feet 10,000 square feet 80 feet Qualifying provisions: 250 1. 9,000 square feet for 3 units, plus 1,000 square feet for each additional dwelling unit up to and 251 including 14 units. 21,000 square feet for 15 units, plus 800 square feet for each additional dwelling unit 252 up to 1 acre. For developments greater than 1 acre, 1,000 square feet for each dwelling unit is required. 253 254 D. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height permitted in this district is forty five feet 255 (45'). 256 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 257 1. Front Yard: Twenty percent (20%) of lot depth, but need not exceed twenty five feet (25'). For 258 buildings legally existing on April 12, 1995, the required front yard shall be no greater than the existing 259 yard. 260 2. Corner Side Yard: 261 a. Single-family attached dwellings: Ten feet (10'). 262 b. Multi-family dwellings: Twenty feet (20'). 263 c. All other permitted and conditional uses: Twenty feet (20'). 264 3. Interior Side Yard: 265 a. Single-family attached dwelling: No yard is required, however if one is provided it shall not be 266 less than four feet (4'). 267 b. Multi-family dwellings: The minimum yard shall be eight feet (8'); provided, that no principal 268 building is erected within ten feet (10') of a building on an abutting lot. 269 c. All other permitted and conditional uses: Ten feet (10') on each side. 270 4. Rear Yard: The rear yard shall be twenty five percent (25%) of the lot depth, but need not exceed 271 thirty feet (30'). 272 5. Accessory Buildings And Structures In Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be located 273 in a required yard subject to section 21A.36.020, table 21A.36.020B, "Obstructions In Required Yards", 274 of this title. 275 F. Required Landscape Yards: The front yard, corner side and, for interior lots, one of the interior side 276 yards shall be maintained as a landscape yard except that single-family attached dwellings, no interior 277 side yard shall be required. 278 G. Maximum Building Coverage: The surface coverage of all principal and accessory buildings shall 279 not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the lot area. 280 H. Landscape Buffers: Where a lot abuts a lot in a single-family or two-family residential district, a 281 landscape buffer shall be provided in accordance with chapter 21A.48, "Landscaping And Buffers", of 282 this title. 283 284 285 286 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A.24.130 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential 45 Districts Petition No.: PLNPC2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Amends 21A.37.060 so that design standard requirements in residential districts are separated by building type. • Amends 21A.37.060 to update design standards for the RMF-35 and RMF-45 districts. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends Chapter 21A.37.060 as follows: 1 21A.37.060: DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRED IN EACH ZONING DISTRICT: 2 This section identifies each design standard and to which zoning districts the standard applies. If a box is 3 checked (X) or noted with a dimension, that standard is required. If a box is blank, it is not required. If a 4 specific dimension or detail of a design standard differs among zoning districts or differs from the 5 definition, it will be indicated within the box. In cases when a dimension in this table conflicts with a 6 dimension in the definition, the dimensions listed in the table shall take precedence. 7 Table 21A.37.060 8 A. Residential Districts 9 1. Standards for Single-family, Urban House, Two-family, and Cottage Development Building 10 Forms: 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _7/16/25__________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 12 2. Standards for Row House Building Form 13 14 3. Standards for Multi-Family Building Form 15 3 16 4. Standards for all Other Building Forms 17 A. Residential Districts: 18 Standard District 4 (Code Section) RMF- 30 RMF- 35 RMF- 45 RMF- 75 FB-UN1 Ground floor use (%) (21A.37.050 A1) Building materials: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050 B3) 50 Building materials: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050 B4) 50 Glass: ground floor (%) (21A.37.050 C1) 20 Glass: upper floors (%) (21A.37.050 C2) 15 Building entrances (feet) (21A.37.050 D) X Blank wall: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050 E) 15 Street facing facade: maximum length (feet) (21A.37.050F) Upper floor step back (feet) (21A.37.050) Lighting: exterior (21A.37.050H) Lighting: parking lot (21A.37.050I) Screening of mechanical equipment (21A.37.050J) X Screening of service areas (21A.37.050K) X Parking garages or structures (21A.37.050M) 19 1 Project Title: RMF 35 and RMF 45 Consolidation: Chapter 21A Assorted References Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01388 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 16, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended May 14, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): 1. Amends the titles found in the table of contents of 21A.24 to reflect the change moving the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts in a single chapter. 2. Amends Chapter 21A.22.010 to reflect the change moving the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts in a single chapter. 3. Amends Chapter 21A.33.020 to update permitted and conditional land uses in both the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. 4. Amends Chapter 21A.34.020.M.2 to update section references. 5. Amends Table 21A.40.090 to update section references. 6. Amends Chapter 21A.44.060.A to update section references. 7. Amends Chapter 21A.44.080.B to update section references. 8. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.G.2 to update section references. 9. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.H.2 to update section references. 10. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.A.4.c to update section references. 11. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.B.4.c to update section references. 12. Amends 21A.55.020.B.4.a to eliminate the lot area limits for waiving density requirements to converting nonconforming commercial properties in RMF districts through a Planned Development. 13. Amends Chapter 21A.55.060 to update section references to only include RMF-45 and reduce the minimum required area for Planned Development. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Amends the titles found in the table of contents of 21A.24 as follows: 1 21A.24.130: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential Districts 2 21A.24.140: RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 3 2. Amends Chapter 21A.22.010 as follows: 4 21A.22.010: Zoning Districts 5 In order to carry out the purposes of this title, Salt Lake City is divided into the following zoning 6 districts: 7 Section Reference District Name 21A.24.130 RMF-35 and RMF-45 Moderate Density Multi- Family Residential Districts APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: __7/16/25__________________ By: ____________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 2 21A.24.140 RMF-45 Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District 3. Amends Chapter 21A.33.020, modifying only the RMF-35 and RMF-45 columns, as follows: 8 21A.33.020: TABLE OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES FOR 9 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS: 10 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District Accessory use, except those that are otherwise specifically regulated elsewhere in this title P P Adaptive reuse for additional uses in eligible buildings C3 C3 Affordable housing incentives development P P Community garden P P Community recreation center C C Daycare center, adult P CP Daycare center, child P P Dwelling, assisted living facility (large) CP P Dwelling, assisted living facility (limited capacity) P P Dwelling, assisted living facility (small) P P Dwelling, congregate care facility (large) CP CP Dwelling, congregate care facility (small) P P Dwelling; dormitory, fraternity, sorority Dwelling, group home (large) CP CP Dwelling, group home (small) P P Dwelling, manufactured home P P Dwelling, multi- family P P Dwelling, residential support (large) P CP Dwelling, residential support (small) CP CP 3 Dwelling, rooming (boarding) house P CP Dwelling, single- family (attached) P P Dwelling, twin home P P Governmental facility C C Home occupation P1 P1 Municipal service use, including City utility use and police and fire station C C Nursing care facility P P Office, excluding medical and dental clinic and office Parking, off site Parking, park and ride lot shared with existing use P6 P6 Place of worship on lots less than 4 acres in size C C Plazas P P School, seminary and religious institute C C Utility, building or structure P5 P5 Qualifying provisions: 11 1. Subject to section 21A.36.030 of this title. 12 2. Provided that no more than 2 two-family buildings are located adjacent to one another and no 13 more than 3 such dwellings are located along the same block face (within subdivisions approved 14 after April 12, 1995). 15 3. Subject to conformance with the provisions of subsection 21A.52.060.A. 16 4. Subject to conformance with the provisions of section 21A.36.150 of this title. 17 5. See subsection 21A.02.050B of this title for utility regulations. 18 6. Prohibited when it includes the demolition of a dwelling unit. 19 4. Amends Chapter 21A.34.020.M.2.a as follows: 20 21A.34.020: H HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT: 21 M. Reconstruction 22 2. Modifications authorized: The following modifications are authorized for reconstruction 23 in accordance with this Subsection: 24 a. Density: The qualifying provisions for density found in the minimum lot area and lot 25 width tables of the zoning district do not apply to the proposed reconstruction, and in 26 4 the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per 27 dwelling unit does not apply. 28 5. Amends Table 21A.40.090, modifying only the RMF-35 and RMF-45 rows, as follows: 29 TABLE 21A.40.090 30 WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES 31 Notes: 32 P =Permitted use C =Conditional use 33 1. Allowed as a permitted use on a residential building consisting of 4 or more attached dwelling 34 units and on nonresidential buildings. Zoning Administrator approval is required to assure 35 compliance to subsection EC2a of this section. 36 6. Amends the headings in Table 21A.44.040 -A. Other than identified below, there are no 37 other changes to the table. 38 TABLE 21A.44.040-A: MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF STREET PARKING: DU= dwelling unit sq. ft.= square feet Land Use Parking General Context Transit Context and MU-11 located fixed- rail transit; Aall not listed in and MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¾ mile from fixed- rail transit; SR-3, FB-UN1, MU-2, MU- -5, MU-6, MU- 8, and MU-11 mile and ¼ mile from fixed-rail transit; D-2 MU-5, MU-6, MU- 8, and MU-11 located within ¼ mile of fixed-rail transit; D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, UI Wall Mount3 Roof Mount Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Less Than 2' 3 Antennas And Antenna Support Structure Greater Than 2' Wide3 Lattice Tower Stealth Height Limit But Not To Is Less) Exceeding The Height Limit Of The Zone Up To 30 Height Limit But Not To Is Less) The Height Limit Of The Zone Up To 30 RMF-35 P1 5 Distance to fixed-rail transit shall be measured radially in a straight line from the closest point of the subject property line to the closest point of a fixed-rail transit station platform 7. Amends headings in Table 21A.44.040-C. Other than identified below, there are no other 39 changes to the table. 40 TABLE 21A.44.040-C: MINIMUM BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS*: (Calculation of Bicycle Parking Spaces to be Provided per Residential Unit or Based on Usable Floor Area) USE General Context Transit Context MU-11 located more than ¾ mile to fixed- transit; Aall zoning districts not listed in MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¾ mile from fixed-rail transit; SR-3, FB-UN1, MU-2, MU-3, 8, and MU-11 located between ½ mile and ¼ mile from fixed- rail MU-5, MU-6, MU-8, and MU-11 located within ¼ mile of fixed- rail transit; D-1, D-3, D-4, G-MU, UI 8. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.G.2 as follows: 41 2. RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 zoning districts: The qualifying provisions for density 42 found in the minimum lot area and lot width tables for the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45, and 43 RMF-75 zoning districts do not apply and in the RMF-30 zoning district, the minimum lot size 44 per dwelling unit does not apply, provided the affordability requirements for Type B in Table 45 21A.52.050.G are met. 46 2. RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45 and RMF-75 zoning districts: In the RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 47 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not apply, and in the RMF-75 48 zoning district, the qualifying provisions for density found in the minimum lot area and lot width 49 table do not apply, provided the affordability requirements for Type B in Table 21A.52.050.G are 50 met. 51 9. Amends Chapter 21A.52.050.H.2 as follows: 52 2. Within the RMF-30, RMF-35, RMF-45, and RMF-75 zoning districts the following provisions 53 shall apply: 54 a. Unit Mix: No more than 25% of the units in the development shall be less than 500 square 55 feet to promote a mix of unit sizes. 56 b. Parking: Unless there is a lesser parking requirement in Chapter 21A.44, only one half (0.5) 57 of an off-street parking space per unit is required in multifamily developments with less than 58 10 units. 59 c. Yards: The minimum required yards shall apply to the perimeter of the development and not 60 to the individual principal buildings within the development. 61 d. Lot width: Minimum lot width requirements do not apply. 62 10. Amends Subsection 21A.52.060.A.4.c as follows: 63 6 c. Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width: Minimum lot area and lot width requirements of the 64 zoning district do not apply for the adaptive reuse in all zoning districts. In the RMF-30, 65 RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts, the minimum lot size per dwelling unit does not 66 apply. 67 11. Amends Chapter 21A.52.060.B.4.c as follows: 68 c. Minimum Lot Area, Width, and Coverage: 69 (1) The minimum lot width for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width 70 tables of the zoning district does not apply. 71 (2) The minimum lot area for the land use found in the minimum lot area and lot width 72 tables of the zoning district only applies for the following zoning districts: FR-1, FR-2, 73 FR-3, R -1/12,000, R-1/7,000 and R-1/5,000. 74 (3) RMF-30, RMF-35, and RMF-45 zoning districts: The minimum lot size per dwelling 75 unit does not apply. 76 (4) Lot coverage may be calculated for the overall development area not the individual lot 77 or parcel within the development area. 78 12. Amends 21A.55.020.B.4.a as follows: 79 a. Developments approved as a Planned Development in In the RMF zoning districts and on 80 lots 0.20 acres or more in size, developments that change a nonconforming commercial use 81 to a residential use that is allowed in the zoning district are exempt from the density 82 limitations of the that zoning district when approved as a planned development. 83 13. Amends Chapter 21A.55.060 as follows: 84 Table 21A.55.060 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 85 District Minimum Planned Development Size Moderate Density Multi- 86 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Warren Crummett Sent:Monday, May 19, 2025 3:33 PM To:Barlow, Aaron Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hey Aaron. Congrats on getting a positive recommendation from planning and sending that to city hall! Has much changed with timing of a July acceptance from city council? Then when would I be able to apply for an application under the new zone? On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:52 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hello Aaron, Hope you are doing well and the RMF project is going as smoothly as possible. I have a property that I am planning to buy, and the lender wanted to get confirmation on the unit count that will be allowed under the new zoning. Basically they wanted to get a letter from the city saying 10 units are possible on the property. The property is .32 acres so it is well within the new guidelines. My closing is at the end of July. Do you think it would be out of the question to ask for an informal letter from you so I can make the lender comfortable? On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, Hope you had a great weekend. Just wanted to include some food for thought as I am working on the design of 2 different RMF-35/45 properties 1. Max Height: I would love to be able to build a 4 story townhome, or at least one with a room upstairs and rooftop deck. Not having a height difference for multifamily vs row houses would be great. In my eyes, changing the use of the building will not impact how well the massing fits into the neighborhood. I understand RMF-35 would still not allow this, but for RMF-45 that could be a great addition. 2. Building Form Unit Limits: I don't think limiting a row house based on units really accomplishes anything. Right now there are limitations on the street facing facade which helps limit the size and massing of the building already. If a developer wants to create smaller units and try to hit a more affordable segment of the market, I feel they should be allowed to do so. 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Barlow, Aaron Sent:Wednesday, June 4, 2025 12:59 PM To:Troy Rawlings Subject:RE: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 I’ve answered your question in green below. From: Troy Rawlings Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 10:42 AM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 Hello Aaron, A follow up to the set-back rules. The address of the subject property is 2172 S 800 E. The neighboring property directly to the east is Single Family. So are you saying that the setback is 10ft, minimum for cottage homes, row houses and apartment buildings? o I’m looking at the zoning map and your property does not abut a single-family zoning district on any side. The single-family houses next to your property are all in the RMF- 35 district and the additional setback is not required. When it is required, that additional setback is only for larger building forms: Row Houses, Apartments, and non- residential buildings—not cottages. Behind the property to the west is an alleyway, and across the alleyway to the west the property is zoned Single Family, what would be the setback for cottage type homes, row houses and apartments? o Since it is zoned RMF-35 not additional setback is required. For parking, what is a standard parking space size? What if the property is located within 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile within public transportation? Can I have fewer parking spaces? o Parking dimension requirements are listed in the Salty Lake City Off-street Parking Manual (found here: https://www.slcdocs.com/Planning/Guides/off-street-parking- manual.pdf). It varies based on a number of factors. o There are parking reductions available to projects within ½ mile of fixed rail in 21A.44 of the zoning regulations. Thank you, Troy On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:14 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: Hi Troy, Thanks for reaching out! I have tried to answer your questions as best I can below: 2 From what I understand the number of units is dictated by lot frontage width and the total acreage (square feet). However, the frontage width will no longer apply potentially if the rules change, Is this correct? o That is correct. Current regulations have a minimum lot width requirement. These are being eliminated, and only the minimum lot size will determine the number of units. If the rule changes then the lot at 2182 S 800 E of .22 acres or 9,583 sq feet would equate to a maximum of 19 units? o For cottage developments, the minimum lot area (density limit) is 500 square feet per unit, so the maximum number of cottages you could build on the lot would be 19. Every other building type in the RMF proposal (Duplexes, Rowhouses, and Apartments) has a minimum lot area of 750 square feet per unit, which would allow for 12 units. Units within cottage developments are typically smaller than other unit types. They cannot have more than 850 square feet of gross floor area (That’s the sq. ft. number usually provided in real estate listings—the floor area of the living space) and must be shorter than 23 feet in height (flat or pitched roof). Could I build a smaller apartment-style complex or condos? o Yes! Apartments are allowed in the proposal, up to 35 feet in height in the RMF-35 district (where your property is located). With a minimum lot area of 750 square feet per unit, your property could have up to 12 units. They can be rented or sold in your case, there is a limit of 20 units per apartment building. A project may have more, but individual buildings are limited to 20. What does a cottage court building style look like? o Cottage developments can come in many forms. Individual units can be standalone, detached buildings, or they can be attached in rows. They can face an internal courtyard or sit in a line, facing the street. Each building can sit on its own lot, or the buildings can all be on one parcel (similar to rowhouses). If a cottage development project includes garages, they cannot be attached to the individual units. Here are some photo examples: 649 E 700 S 3 852 S 800 E What will the setback rules be? o Setbacks would apply to the entire development site and not between individual units (you are only limited by building and fire codes in that regard). Setbacks vary based on the type of building. Smaller buildings, such as cottage developments, single-family houses, and twin homes, have a 4-foot side yard setback and a 10-foot rear yard setback. Larger building types, like apartments and rowhouses, are required to have additional setbacks when a project directly abuts a single-family zoning district (10-foot side yard and 15-foot rear-yard setbacks). Otherwise, they’re the same as the other building types (the tables on pages 5 and 6 in the draft ordinance lay out the requirements for each building type). o Since the setbacks only apply to the perimeter, cottage development units are permitted to be attached like a rowhouse or twin- under 23 feet and less than 850 feet of internal floor area). What parking requirements will there be? o The proposal would require one space per dwelling unit, no matter the unit type, size, or bedroom count. When will the meeting take place when this decision will be final? 4 o I am currently working on the document that we will send to the City Council (I am waiting for a few things from our Attorney’s office) and should have something sent to them by the end of this month. Hopefully, the City Council will review the proposal sometime in July. They would then need to hold a public hearing and make an official decision. I have been saying mid to late fall (October- go well (based on how long similar proposals have taken in the past). How long after the decision is made, will the changes take effect? o That will be up to the City Council, but it is typically immediate with a small gr ace period, where the old regulations are also available if a property owner or developer so chooses. The only delay would be the time it takes for the new regulations to be published—typical 1-2 weeks. Please let me know if you have any follow- the project over the phone if that is easier for you (I know it helps me when I want to talk through a scenario). Thank you! Sincerely, AARON BARLOW, AICP | (he/him) Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: 801.535.6182 | Cell: 801.872.8389 Email: aaron.barlow@slc.gov WWW.SLC.GOV SLC.GOV/PLANNING Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. From: Troy Rawlings Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9:51 PM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Fwd: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 Hello Aaron, 5 I am inquiring about the potential changes to rules around density for RMF-35 and RMF-45 plats. From what I understand the number of units is dictated by lot frontage width and the total acreage (square feet). However, the frontage width will no longer apply potentially if the rules change, Is this correct? Could you confirm a few things for me: - of 19 units? Could I build a smaller apartment style complex or condos? What does cottage court building style look like? -What will the setback rules be? -What parking requirements will there be? -When will the meeting take place when this decision will be final? -How long after the decision is made, will the changes take effect? Thank you, Troy Rawlings ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gilmore, Kristina <kristina.gilmore@slc.gov> Date: Wed, May 28, 2025 at 3:10 PM Subject: RE: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 To: Troy Rawlings 7 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Troy Rawlings Date: Thu, May 22, 2025 at 1:00 PM Subject: 2172 S 800 E - RMF-35 To: Elmore, Noah <Noah.Elmore@slc.gov> Hello Noah, Quick question. For the subject address 2172 S 800 E, the property is approximately 60 feet wide and is .22 acres or just over 9,583 sq ft. According to the table of SLC, for me to have up to 11 units the property must be 80 feet wide, or could I get up to 11 units at 60 feet wide? Or simply ask, how many total units could I build on this lot? I know that there was a rule change recently that consolidated RMF-35 and RMF-40, so is there more flexibility to add more units than existing 4 on the property. I want to tear is down and build more missing middle. Thank you, Troy -- 8 TROY RAWLINGS | Realtor® Realty ONE Group | Rawlings Real Estate 1 Barlow, Aaron From:Warren Crummett Sent:Wednesday, July 9, 2025 11:44 AM To:Barlow, Aaron Subject:Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Aaron, Hope you're enjoying summer. I was wondering if any of the code has changed from the March 5th edition of the code that you sent to me? If it has changed, could you please send? Also, how's the timeline for the next meeting looking? I believe they passed the budget Thanks for all your help! On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 9:38 AM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, a property? If I wanted to do that for RMF-35, would it be after the decision date I could apply for a zoning certification letter that states this? Thanks for helping me work through this On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 2:28 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: The hearing might be in August, but yeah, that’s essentially the timeline we expect (if thing don’t get slowed down). From: Warren Crummett Sent: Friday, May 23, 2025 1:23 PM To: Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> Subject: Re: (EXTERNAL) Re: RMF-35 Zoning Changes Gotcha. And that is a July public hearing and a September decision date unless there is opposition? 3 Then when would I be able to apply for an application under the new zone? On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:52 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hello Aaron, Hope you are doing well and the RMF project is going as smoothly as possible. I have a property that I am planning to buy, and the lender wanted to get confirmation on the unit count that will be allowed under the new zoning. Basically they wanted to get a letter from the city saying 10 units are possible on the property. The property is .32 acres so it is well within the new guidelines. My closing is at the end of July. Do you think it would be out of the question to ask for an informal letter from you so I can make the lender comfortable? On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Hi Aaron, Hope you had a great weekend. Just wanted to include some food for thought as I am working on the design of 2 different RMF-35/45 properties 1. Max Height: I would love to be able to build a 4 story townhome, or at least one with a room upstairs and rooftop deck. Not having a height difference for multifamily vs row houses would be great. In my eyes, changing the use of the building will not impact how well the massing fits into the neighborhood. I understand RMF-35 would still not allow this, but for RMF-45 that could be a great addition. 4 2. Building Form Unit Limits: I don't think limiting a row house based on units really accomplishes anything. Right now there are limitations on the street facing facade which helps limit the size and massing of the building already. If a developer wants to create smaller units and try to hit a more affordable segment of the market, I feel they should be allowed to do so. For instance, if I have a building form that is 150' wide and 40' deep, I can split the 150' into 6 units which is 25' wide for each unit. But if I was able, I would split the units into 20' wide or less unit sizes so I could get roughly 8 units. Both buildings are the same size, could include the same parking, etc but now I have bigger units that I have to sell for a higher price. Feel free to use this as you wish. Also I would love to see the Lake St area be included with your proposal to be RMF-45! On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 5:14 PM Warren Crummett wrote: Right on! Thanks On Wed, Mar 26, 2025, 4:56 PM Barlow, Aaron <Aaron.Barlow@slc.gov> wrote: No that will change to 15 feet Sincerely, Aaron Barlow Sent via phone, so please excuse any typos From: Warren Crummett Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 4:54:06 PM 6 On Mon, Feb 24, 2025, 8:22 AM Warren Crummett wrote: Sounds good. I don't have the info organized, so if there's anything in particular could you please let me know? On the proforma, yes I would be happy to help. Townhomes or apartments? On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 1:16 PM Barlow, Aaron <aaron.barlow@slc.gov> wrote: Hi Warren, That would be great! I’m happy to take a look at anything you have put together. If I gave you an address, would you be able to do help me with a baseline proforma calculation for the property’s development potential? Thank you! Sincerely, AARON BARLOW, AICP | (he/him) Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION | SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION Office: 801.535.6182 | Cell: 801.872.8389 Email: aaron.barlow@slc.gov WWW.SLC.GOV SLC.GOV/PLANNING Disclaimer: The Planning Division strives to give the best customer service possible and to respond to questions as accurately as possible based upon the information provided. However, answers given at the counter and/or prior to application are not binding and they are not a substitute for formal Final Action, which may only occur in response to a complete application to the Planning Division. Those relying on verbal input or preliminary written feedback do so at their own risk and do not vest any property with development rights. This page has intentionally been left blank Properties 1. 8 E Hillside Ave • Capitol Hill Neighborhood Plan • High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 321 & 323 S 600 E and 602 E 300 S • Central Community Plan • Medium Residential / Mixed Use 1 Properties 1.120, 126, & 130 W Mead Ave • Ballpark Station Area Plan • Central 9th Corridor Area 2. 1414 S West Temple • Ballpark Station Area Plan • Medium Density Transition Area Peoples Freeway Park 3. 976 & 996 S 200 E • Central Community Plan • Medium High Density 1 2 3 Properties 1. 2321 E 2100 S • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 2673 S Preston St • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 Properties 1. 1418 S 1100 E • Central Community Plan • Low Residential / Mixed Use 2. 1945 & 1949 S 1300 E • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan 1 2 Properties 1. 351 S Concord St • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node 2. 866, 870, 876 W 700 S and 665 S 900 W • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node • Nonresidential Use 1 2 Properties 1. 1659, 1671, & 1677 W 300 S • Westside Master Plan • Located at Regional Node and Redwood Rd Corridor 2. 351 S Concord St • Westside Master Plan • Located at Neighborhood Node 1 2 Properties 1. 1121 E Brickyard Rd • Sugar House Neighborhood Plan • Medium High Density Residential 1 This page has intentionally been left blank Item B4 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 PUBLIC HEARING MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Michael Sanders, Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE:Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Text Amendment MOTION 1 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and approve the ordinance adopting the Utah Wildland-Urban Interface Code. MOTION 2 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action on this agenda item to a future Council meeting. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY www.slc.gov/council/ TO:City Council Members FROM: Michael Sanders Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE:WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE FIRE CODE TEXT AMENDMENT ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE During the 2025 legislative session, the Utah State Legislature passed House Bill 48. As part of this bill, municipalities are required to “adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building standards.”1 Previously, this requirement was optional for cities.2 If a municipality fails to comply, they risk the State choosing not to pay reimbursement costs associated with fighting wildfire.3 The standards which the City is required to adopt are the 2006 edition of the Utah Wildland Urban Interface Code, issued by the International Code Council, with the alternatives or amendments approved by the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands. This building code would only apply to the parcels identified in Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map (Attachment A of the draft ordinance.4) It is not a citywide application. The map being considered in this ordinance should not be confused with the State map which is being developed which will access fees to certain high risk WUI properties. This difference is addressed on page two of this report. Goal of the briefing: Prepare to consider the ordinance at the November 25th 2025 Formal Meeting. A Public Hearing will be held regarding this proposal on November 18th. POLICY QUESTIONS 1.The Council may wish to ask the Administration what engagement it has had or will have with legislators to help address resident concerns with possible future State legislation updates on WUI code compliance such as county fees and insurance cancelation. 1 H.B. 48 lines 430-433 2 It was not uncommon for cities along the Wasatch Front to adopt WUI code standards prior to the State mandate. Sandy, Draper, and Park City have managed WUI codes previously to the State mandate. 3 H.B. 48 lines 498-505 4 Transmittal pages 11 – 15 Page | 3 ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION This ordinance does three main things. 1. Complies with H.B 48 which requires local governments with an Urban Wildland Interface to adopt the WUI Code 2. Imposes the WUI Code on certain properties in the City which are highlighted in yellow on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map 3. Establishes that in cases of conflict between the City Zoning Code and the WUI Code, the WUI Code takes precedence over the Zoning Code with the exceptions of historic designation and the provisions of the Riparian Corridor Overlay which would require Public Utilities and the Fire Official to find a solution that meets the intent of both codes The intent is for the WUI Code to apply when a property owner seeks a building permit for a new principal structure, major addition, or roof replacement. The landscaping and vegetation requirements in the code may be enforced after adoption. This is commonly understood in the WUI Code as “defensible space” which limits the height and type of vegetation within certain distances of structures. The Legislature is expected to make further modifications to the state-adopted WUI Code in the coming years. The proposed amendment is drafted to self-update to whatever WUI regulations are adopted at the State level in Utah Code 15A-2-103(2), so no additional City Code amendments will be required to stay current with the State WUI Code. In the event that new properties need to be added to the map, the standard map amendment and public hearing process would apply. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map was created in coordination with the State Division of Forrest, Fire, and State Lands. The map went through several iterations as the Fire Department and other City representatives met with property owners and community organizations. The Fire Department went parcel by parcel to identify fire risk, fuel types, and defensible space needs. The goal of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map is to develop city resiliency and defensible positions in the event of a wildfire. The Fire Department presented at 11 Community Council meetings and the Greater Avenues Fair. For more information on the public process and comments, please see pages 16 – 17 of the Planning Division Staff Report. During the Planning Commission Hearing on September 24, 2025, many residents expressed concern at aspects of H.B. 48 which are not in control by the City. The bill sections that address those issues are summarized below H.B 48 lines 119 – 154 - Wildland Urban Interface Evaluation and Fees Properties in identified high-risk wildland urban interface areas will be evaluated each year by either the State or the County. The evaluation is focused on fire risk factors and uses a triage scale. Beginning in 2026, the State requires counties to assess an annual fee on these properties. The amount has not yet been set, but it will be determined by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands. The City does not control the fee level. Property owners will be informed of their property’s classification and provided with information on steps and resources to help lower their risk rating which may lower the fee in future years. H.B. 48 lines 156 – 222 - Insuring Wildland Urban Interface Property Insurance companies that provide property or casualty coverage in Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas must use the official wildfire risk boundary established by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands to determine whether a property is considered “high risk.” The “wildfire risk boundary” is not the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map but may have some overlap. Insurers may use additional fire hazard data for rate setting or underwriting only if it aligns with that state- defined boundary and complies with insurance laws and rules. Property owners may file complaints with the Page | 3 Utah Insurance Department if they believe insurers are not following these rules; the department has authority to investigate and enforce compliance. Property Assessment Update on Assessment of City Properties Compiling a list of all city properties and prioritizing the wildfire risk Tracking these risks in a city owned software (Cartegraph) Implementing the Defensible Space Assessment starting with the highest priorities Determination of mitigation projects based on the Defensible Space Assessments ATTACHMENTS 2006 U W U I C TAH ILDLAND- RBAN NTERFACE ODE 2006 UtahWildland-Urban Interface Code First Printing:July 2006 Second Printing:October 2006 Third Printing:March 2007 Fourth Printing:February 2008 Fifth Printing:June 2008 COPYRIGHT © 2006 by INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. ALLRIGHTSRESERVED.This2006 UtahWildland-Urban InterfaceCode containssubstantialcopyrightedmaterialfromthe 2003 International Wildland-Urban InterfaceCode,whichisacopyrighted work owned by theInternationalCodeCouncil,Inc. Withoutadvancewrittenpermissionfromthecopyrightowner,nopartofthisbookmaybereproduced,distributedortransmittedin anyformorbyanymeans,including,withoutlimitation,electronic,opticalormechanicalmeans(bywayofexampleandnotlimita- tion,photocopying,orrecordingbyorinaninformationstorageretrievalsystem).Forinformationonpermissiontocopymaterial exceeding fair use, please contact: Publications, 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, IL 60478-5771. Phone 1-888-ICC-SAFE (422-7233). Trademarks: “International Code Council,” the “International Code Council” logo and the “International Residential Code” are trademarks of the International Code Council, Inc. PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. PREFACE Introduction Internationally,codeofficialsrecognizetheneedforamodern,up-to-datecodeaddressingthemitigationoffireintheurban-wildlandin- terface.The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code™,inthis2003edition,isdesignedtobridgethegapbetweenenforcementofthe International Building Codeand International Fire Codebymitigatingthehazardofwildfiresthroughmodelcoderegulations,which safeguard the public health and safety in all communities, large and small. Thiscomprehensiveurban-wildlandinterfacecodeestablishesminimumregulationsforlanduseandthebuiltenvironmentindesig- natedurban-wildlandinterfaceareasusingprescriptiveandperformance-relatedprovisions.Itisfoundedondatacollectedfromtestsand fireincidents,technicalreportsandmitigationstrategiesfromaroundtheworld.This2003editionisfullycompatiblewithallthe Interna- tional Codes™(“I-Codes”™)published by the International Code Council(ICC), including the International Building Code, ICC Electrical Code™, International Energy Conservation Code, International Existing Builiding Code, International Fire Code, Interna- tional Fuel Gas Code, International Mechanical Code, ICC Performance Code™, International Plumbing Code, International Pri- vate Sewage Disposal Code, International Property Maintenance Code, International Residential Codeand International Zoning Code. The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code provisionsprovidemanybenefits,includingthemodelcodedevelopmentprocess, whichoffersaninternationalforumforfiresafetyprofessionalstodiscussperformanceandprescriptivecoderequirements.Thisforum providesanexcellentarenatodebateproposedrevisions.Thismodelcodealsoencouragesinternationalconsistencyintheapplicationof provisions. Development Thisisthefirsteditionofthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code (2003)andistheculminationofaneffortinitiatedin2001by theICCandthethreestatutorymembersoftheInternationalCodeCouncil:BuildingOfficialsandCodeAdministratorsInternational,Inc. (BOCA),InternationalConferenceofBuildingOfficials(ICBO)andSouthernBuildingCodeCongressInternational(SBCCI).Theintent wastodraftacomprehensivesetofregulationsformitigatingthehazardtolifeandpropertyfromtheintrusionoffirefromwildlandexpo- sures and fire from adjacent structures, and preventing structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. Technical content of the 2000 Wildland- Urban Interface Code,publishedbytheInternationalFireCodeInstitute,wasutilizedasthebasisforthedevelopment,followed bythepublicationofthe2001FinalDraft.This2003editionisbasedontheFinalDraft,withchangesapprovedinthe2002ICCCodeDe- velopment Process. A new edition such as this is promulgated every three years. Withthedevelopmentandpublicationofthefamilyof International Codes in2000,thecontinueddevelopmentandmaintenanceofthe modelcodesindividuallypromulgatedbyBOCA(“BOCANationalCodes”),ICBO(“UniformCodes”)andSBCCI(“StandardCodes”) wasdiscontinued.The2003 International Codes,aswellastheirpredecessors—the2000 International Codes—areintendedtobethesuc- cessor set of codes to those codes previously developed by BOCA,ICBOandSBCCI. Thedevelopmentofasinglefamilyofcomprehensiveandcoordinated International Codes wasasignificantmilestoneinthedevelop- mentofregulationsforthebuiltenvironment.Thetimingofthispublicationmirrorsamilestoneinthechangeinstructureofthemodel codes,namely,thependingconsolidationofBOCA,ICBOandSBCCIintotheICC.Theactivitiesandservicespreviouslyprovidedbythe individual model code organizations will be the responsibility of the consolidated ICC. Thiscodeisfoundedonprinciplesintendedtomitigatethehazardfromfiresthroughthedevelopmentofprovisionsthatadequatelypro- tectpublichealth,safetyandwelfare;provisionsthatdonotunnecessarilyincreaseconstructioncosts;provisionsthatdonotrestricttheuse ofnewmaterials,productsormethodsofconstruction;andprovisionsthatdonotgivepreferentialtreatmenttoparticulartypesorclassesof materials, products or methods of construction. Adoption The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code isavailableforadoptionandusebyjurisdictionsinternationally.Itsusewithinagovern- mentaljurisdictionisintendedtobeaccomplishedthroughadoptionbyreferenceinaccordancewithproceedingsestablishingthejurisdic- tion’s laws. At the time of adoption, jurisdictions should insert the appropriate information in provisions requiring specific local information,suchasthenameoftheadoptingjurisdiction.Theselocationsareshowninbracketedwordsinsmallcapitallettersinthecode and in the sample ordinance. The sample adoption ordinance on page v addresses several key elements of a code adoption ordinance, including the information required for insertion into the code text. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE iii 10b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_iii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:47:06 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Maintenance The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code iskeptup-to-datethrough thereviewofproposed changessubmittedbycode enforcing officials, industry representatives, design professionals and other interested parties. Proposed changes are carefully considered through an open code development process in which all interested and affected parties may participate. ThecontentsofthisworkaresubjecttochangeboththroughtheCodeDevelopmentCyclesandthegovernmentalbodythatenactsthe codeintolaw.Formoreinformationregardingthecodedevelopmentprocess,contacttheCodeandStandardDevelopmentDepartmentof the International Code Council. Althoughthedevelopmentprocedureofthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code assuresthehighestdegreeofcare,ICCand thefoundingmembersofICC—BOCA,ICBOandSBCCI—theirmembersandthoseparticipatinginthedevelopmentofthiscodedonot acceptanyliabilityresultingfromcomplianceornoncompliancewiththeprovisions,becauseICCanditsfoundingmembersdonothave thepowerorauthoritytopoliceorenforcecompliancewiththecontentsofthiscode.Onlythegovernmentalbodythatenactsthecodeinto law has such authority. Authority TheDivisionisrequiredtoestablishminimumstandardsforawildlandfireordinanceandspecifyminimumstandardsforwildlandfire training,certificationandwildlandfiresuppressionequipmentinaccordancewithsubsections65A-8-6(3)(a)and65A-8-6(3)(b).Thisre- quirement is promulgated under general rule-making authority of subsection 65A-1-4(2). iv 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 20b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_iv.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0b_pref_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:47:24 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen ORDINANCE The International Codes aredesignedandpromulgatedtobeadoptedbyreferencebyordinance.Jurisdictionswishingtoadoptthe2003 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code asanenforceableregulationforthemitigationoffireintheurban-wildlandinterfaceshould ensurethatcertainfactualinformationisincludedintheadoptingordinanceatthetimeadoptionisbeingconsideredbytheappropriate governmentalbody.Thefollowingsampleadoptionordinanceaddressesseveralkeyelementsofacodeadoptionordinance,includingthe information required for insertion into the code text. MinimumStandardsforWildlandFireOrdinance Thedivisionusesthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code asabasisforestablishingtheminimumstandardsdiscussedinthis document.AcountyordinancethatatleastmeetstheminimumstandardsshouldbeinplacebySeptember2006. TheDivisionincorporatesbyreferencethe2003 International Code Council Wildland-Urban Interface Code astheminimumstandard forwildlandfireordinanceinconjunctionwithUtahrequirements. SAMPLE ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE ORDINANCE NO.________ An ordinance of the [JURISDICTION]adopting the 2003 edition of the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code as currently amendedbythedivisionofForestry,FireandStateLands,regulatingandgoverningthemitigationofhazardtolifeandpropertyfromthe intrusionoffirefromwildlandexposures,firefromadjacentstructuresandpreventionofstructurefiresfromspreadingtowildlandfuelsin the [JURISDICTION];providingfortheissuanceofpermitsandcollectionoffeestherefor;repealingOrdinanceNo.______ofthe [JU- RISDICTION]and all other ordinances and parts of the ordinances in conflict therewith. The [GOVERNING BODY]of the [JURISDICTION]does ordain as follows: Section1.Thatacertaindocument,three(3)copiesofwhichareonfileintheofficeofthe [TITLEOFJURISDICTION’SKEEPEROFRE- CORDS]of [NAMEOFJURISDICTION],beingmarkedanddesignatedasthe International Wildland-Urban Interface Code,2003edi- tion, including Appendix Chapters [FILL IN THE APPENDIX CHAPTERS BEING ADOPTED ], as published by the International Code Council,beandisherebyadoptedastheUrban-WildlandInterfaceCodeofthe [JURISDICTION],intheStateof [STATENAME]forreg- ulatingandgoverningthemitigationofhazardtolifeandpropertyfromtheintrusionoffirefromwildlandexposures,firefromadjacent structuresandpreventionofstructurefiresfromspreadingtowildlandfuelsashereinprovided;providingfortheissuanceofpermitsand collectionoffeestherefor;andeachandalloftheregulations,provisions,penalties,conditionsandtermsofsaidUrban-WildlandInterface Codeonfileintheofficeofthe [JURISDICTION]areherebyreferredto,adopted,andmadeaparthereof,asiffullysetoutinthisordi- nance, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes, if any, prescribed in Section 2 of this ordinance. Section 2.The following sections are hereby revised: Section 101.1. Insert:[NAME OF JURISDICTION] Section3.ThatOrdinanceNo.______of [JURISDICTION]entitled [FILLINHERETHECOMPLETETITLEOFTHEORDINANCEOROR- DINANCESINEFFECTATTHEPRESENTTIMESOTHATTHEYWILLBEREPEALEDBYDEFINITEMENTION]andallotherordinancesor parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section4.Thatifanysection,subsection,sentence,clauseorphraseofthisordinanceis,foranyreason,heldtobeunconstitutional,such decisionshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingportionsofthisordinance.The [GOVERNINGBODY]herebydeclaresthatitwould havepassedthisordinance,andeachsection,subsection,clauseorphrasethereof,irrespectiveofthefactthatanyoneormoresections,sub- sections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional. Section5.Thatnothinginthisordinanceorinthe Wildland-Urban Interface Code herebyadoptedshallbeconstruedtoaffectanysuitor proceedingimpendinginanycourt,oranyrightsacquired,orliabilityincurred,oranycauseorcausesofactionacquiredorexisting,under anyactorordinanceherebyrepealedascitedinSection2ofthisordinance;norshallanyjustorlegalrightorremedyofanycharacterbe lost, impaired or affected by this ordinance. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE v 10c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgv.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:33:06 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Section 6.Thatthe [JURISDICTION’SKEEPEROFRECORDS]isherebyorderedanddirectedtocausethisordinancetobepublished. (Anadditionalprovisionmayberequiredtodirectthenumberoftimestheordinanceistobepublishedandtospecifythatitistobeina newspaper in general circulation. Posting may also be required.) Section 7.That this ordinance and the rules, regulations, provisions, requirements, orders and matters established and adopted hereby shall take effect and be in full force and effect [TIME PERIOD]from and after the date of its final passage and adoption. Section 8.Specificboundariesofnaturalorman-madefeaturesofwildland-urbaninterfaceareasshallbeasshownonthewildlandarea interfacemap.Thelegaldescriptionofsuchareasisasdescribedasfollows:[INSERTLEGALDESCRIPTION] vi 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 20c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgvi.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0c_ord_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:33:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 101 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 102 Authority of the Code Official . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 103 Compliance Alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 104 Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 105 Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 106 Plans and Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 107 Inspection and Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 108 Certificate of Completion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Section 201 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 202 Definitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 CHAPTER 3 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Section 301 Wildland-Urban Interface Area Designations. . . . . . 9 CHAPTER 4 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS. . . . . . . . . 11 Section 401 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 402 Applicability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 403 Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 404 Water Supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 405 Fire Protection Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 CHAPTER 5 SPECIAL BUILDING CON- STRUCTION REGULATIONS . . . . 15 Section 501 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 502 Fire Hazard Severity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 503 Ignition-resistant Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 504 Class 1 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 15 505 Class 2 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 16 506 Class 3 Ignition-resistant Construction. . . . . . . . . . 17 507 Replacement or Repair of Roof Coverings. . . . . . . 18 CHAPTER 6 FIRE-PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Section 601 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 603 Defensible Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 604 Maintenance of Defensible Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 605 Spark Arresters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 606 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Installations . . . . . . . . . . 20 607 Storage of Firewood and Combustible Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 APPENDIX A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS. . . . . 21 Section A101 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A102 Vegetation Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 A103 Access Restrictions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A104 Ignition Source Control. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 A105 Control of Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A106 Dumping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A107 Protection of Pumps and Water Storage Facilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 A108 Land Use Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 APPENDIX B VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN. . . . . . . . . . . 25 APPENDIX C FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 INDEX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE vii 10d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgvii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:34:52 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen viii 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE 20d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pgviii.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\0d_toc_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:42:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION101 GENERAL 101.1 Scope.The provisions of this code shall apply to the construction, alteration, movement, repair, maintenance and use of any building, structure or premises within the urban- wildland interface areas in this jurisdiction. Buildingsorconditionsinexistenceatthetimeoftheadop- tionofthiscodeareallowedtohavetheiruseoroccupancycon- tinued,ifsuchcondition,useoroccupancywaslegalatthetime oftheadoptionofthiscode,providedsuchcontinuedusedoes not constitute a distinct danger to life or property. Buildingsorstructuresmovedintoorwithinthejurisdiction shallcomplywiththeprovisionsofthiscodefornewbuildings or structures. 101.2 Objective.The objective of this code is to establish minimum regulations consistent with nationally recognized goodpracticeforthesafeguardingoflifeandproperty.Regula- tions in this code are intended to mitigate the risk to life and structures from intrusion of fire from wildland fire exposures and fire exposures from adjacent structures and to mitigate structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. Thedevelopmentanduseofpropertyinwildland-urbanin- terfaceareasisapotentialthreattolifeand property from fire andresultingerosion.Safeguardstopreventtheoccurrenceof firesandtoprovideadequatefire-protectionfacilitiestocontrol the spread of fire in wildland-urban interfaceareas shallbe in accordance with this code. This code shall supplement the jurisdiction’s building and firecodes,ifsuchcodeshavebeenadopted,toprovideforspe- cial regulations to mitigate the fire- and life-safety hazards of the wildland-urban interface areas. 101.3 Retroactivity.The provisions of the code shall apply toconditionsarisingaftertheadoptionthereof,conditionsnot legally in existence at the adoption of this code, to conditions which, in the opinion of the code official,constitute a distinct hazard to life or property. 101.4 Additions or alterations.Additions or alterations maybemadetoanybuildingorstructurewithoutrequiringthe existingbuildingorstructuretocomplywithalloftherequire- ments of this code, provided the addition or alteration con- forms to that required for a new building or structure. Exception:Provisionsofthiscodethatspecificallyapplyto existing conditions are retroactive. See Section 601.1 and Appendix A. Additions or alterations shall not be made to an existing building or structure that will cause the existing building or structuretobeinviolationofanyoftheprovisionsofthiscode norshallsuchadditionsoralterationscausetheexistingbuild- ingorstructuretobecomeunsafe.Anunsafeconditionshallbe deemed to have been created if an addition or alteration will causetheexistingbuildingorstructuretobecomestructurally unsafeoroverloaded;willnotprovideadequateaccessincom- pliancewiththeprovisionsofthiscodeorwillobstructexisting exits or access; will create a fire hazard; will reduce required fireresistanceorwillotherwisecreateconditionsdangerousto human life. 101.5 Maintenance.Allbuildings,structures,landscapema- terials, vegetation, defensible space or other devices or safe- guards required by this code shall be maintained in conformance to the code edition under which installed. The ownerortheowner’sdesignatedagentshallberesponsiblefor the maintenance of buildings, structures, landscape materials and vegetation. SECTION 102 AUTHORITY OF THE CODE OFFICIAL 102.1 Powersanddutiesofthecodeofficial.Thecodeoffi- cialisherebyauthorizedtoadministerandenforcethiscode,or designatedsectionsthereof,andallordinancesofthejurisdic- tion pertaining to designated wildland-urban interface areas. Forsuchpurposes,thecodeofficialshallhavethepowersofa law enforcement officer. 102.2 Interpretations, rulesand regulations.Thecode of- ficialshallhavethepowertorenderinterpretationsofthiscode andtoadoptandenforcerulesandsupplementalregulationsto clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, rulesandregulationsshallbeinconformancetotheintentand purpose of this code. Acopyofsuchrulesandregulationsshallbefiledwiththe clerk of the jurisdiction and shall be in effect immediately thereafter.Additionalcopiesshallbeavailablefordistribution to the public. 102.3 Liability of the code official.The code official chargedwiththeenforcementofthiscode,actingingoodfaith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by thiscodeorotherpertinentlaworordinance,shallnotthereby be rendered personally liable for damages that may accrue to personsorpropertyasaresultofanactorbyreasonofanactor omissioninthedischargeofsuchduties.Asuitbroughtagainst thecodeofficialoremployeebecauseofsuchactoromission performedbythecodeofficialoremployeeintheenforcement ofanyprovisionofsuchcodesorotherpertinentlawsorordi- nances implemented through the enforcement of this code or enforcedbythecodeenforcementagencyshallbedefendedby this jurisdiction until final termination of such proceedings, andanyjudgmentresultingtherefromshallbeassumedbythis jurisdiction. The code enforcement agency or its parent juris- dictionshallnotbeheldasassuminganyliabilitybyreasonof theinspectionsauthorizedbythiscodeoranypermitsorcertif- icates issued under this code. 102.4 Otheragencies.Whenrequestedtodosobythecode official,otherofficialsofthisjurisdictionshallassistandcoop- 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 1 CHAPTER 1 ADMINISTRATION 101_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:04 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen erate with the code official in the discharge of the duties re- quired by this code. SECTION103 COMPLIANCE ALTERNATIVES 103.1 Practical difficulties.When there are practical diffi- cultiesinvolvedincarryingouttheprovisionsofthiscode,the codeofficialisauthorizedtograntmodificationsforindividual cases on application in writing by the owner or a duly autho- rizedrepresentative.Thecodeofficialshallfirstfindthataspe- cialindividualreasonmakesenforcementofthestrictletterof thiscodeimpractical,themodificationisinconformancetothe intentandpurpose ofthiscode,andthemodificationdoesnot lessenanyfireprotectionrequirementsoranydegreeofstruc- turalintegrity.Thedetailsofanyactiongrantingmodifications shallberecordedandenteredintothefilesofthecodeenforce- ment agency. Ifthecodeofficialdeterminesthatdifficultterrain,dangerof erosionorotherunusualcircumstancesmakestrictcompliance withthevegetationcontrolprovisionsofthecodedetrimental to safety or impractical, enforcement thereof may be sus- pended, provided that reasonable alternative measures are taken. 103.2 Technical assistance.To determine the acceptability of technologies, processes, products, facilities, materials and usesattendingthedesign,operationoruseofabuildingorpre- misessubjecttotheinspectionofthecodeofficial,thecodeof- ficial is authorized to require the owner or the person in possession or control of the building or premises to provide, without charge to the jurisdiction, a technical opinion and re- port. The opinion and report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer, specialist, laboratory or fire safety specialty organi- zation acceptable to the code official and the owner and shall analyze the fire safety of the design, operation or use of the buildingorpremises,thefacilitiesandappurtenances situated thereonandfuelmanagementforpurposesofestablishingfire hazard severity to recommend necessary changes. 103.3 Alternativematerialsormethods.Thecodeofficial, inconcurrencewithapprovalfromthebuildingofficialandfire chief, is authorized to approve alternative materials or meth- ods,providedthatthecodeofficialfindsthattheproposedde- sign,useoroperationsatisfactorilycomplieswiththeintentof thiscodeandthatthealternativeis,forthepurposeintended,at leastequivalent to the level of quality, strength, effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and safety prescribed by this code. Approvalsundertheauthorityhereincontainedshallbesubject to the approval of the building official whenever the alternate materialor method involvesmattersregulated by the Interna- tional Building Code. The code official shall require that sufficient evidence or proofbesubmittedtosubstantiateanyclaimsthatmaybemade regardingitsuse.Thedetailsofanyactiongrantingapprovalof an alternate shall be recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency. SECTION 104 APPEALS 104.1 General.To determine the suitability of alternative materialsandmethodsandtoprovideforreasonableinterpreta- tionsoftheprovisionsofthiscode,thereshallbeandherebyis createdaboardofappealsconsistingoffivememberswhoare qualifiedbyexperienceandtrainingtopassjudgmentonperti- nentmatters.Thecodeofficial,buildingofficialandfirechief shall be ex officio members, and the code official shall act as secretaryoftheboard.Theboardofappealsshallbeappointed bythelegislativebodyandshallholdofficeattheirdiscretion. Theboardshalladoptreasonablerulesandregulationsforcon- ducting its investigations and shall render decisions and find- ingsinwritingtothecodeofficial,withaduplicatecopytothe applicant. 104.2 Limitations of authority.The board of appeals shall not have authority relative to interpretation of the administra- tive provisions of this code and shall not have authority to waive requirements of this code. SECTION105 PERMITS 105.1 General.Whennototherwiseprovidedintherequire- ments of the building or fire code, permits are required in ac- cordance with Section 105. 105.2 Permits required.Unless otherwise exempted, no building or structure regulated by this code shall be erected, constructed, altered, repaired, moved, removed, converted or demolishedunlessaseparatepermitforeachbuildingorstruc- ture has first been obtained from the code official. When required by the code official, a permit shall be ob- tained for the following activities, operations, practices or functions within an wildland-urban interface area: 1. Automobile wrecking yard; 2. Candles and open flames in assembly areas; 3. Explosives or blasting agents; 4. Fireworks; 5. Flammable or combustible liquids; 6. Hazardous materials; 7. Liquefied petroleum gases; 8. Lumberyards; 9. Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing stations; 10.Open burning; 11.Pyrotechnical special effects material; 12.Tents, canopies and temporary membrane structures; 13.Tire storage; 14.Welding and cutting operations; or 15. Other activities as determined by the code official. 105.3 Work exempt from permit.Unless otherwise pro- videdintherequirementsofthebuildingorfirecode,apermit shall not be required for the following: 1. One-storydetachedaccessorybuildingsusedastooland storagesheds,playhousesandsimilaruses,providedthe floorareadoesnotexceed120squarefeet(11.15m2)and ADMINISTRATION 2 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 201_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:04 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen the structure is located more than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from the nearest adjacent structure. 2. Fences not over 6 feet (1829 mm) high. Exemption from the permit requirements of this code shall notbedeemedtograntauthorizationforanyworktobedonein any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. The code official is authorized to stipulate conditions for permits.Permitsshallnotbeissuedwhenpublicsafetywould be at risk, as determined by the code official. 105.4 Permit application.To obtain a permit, the applicant shallfirstfileanapplicationtherefor inwritingon aform fur- nishedbythecodeenforcementagencyforthatpurpose.Every such application shall: 1. Identifyanddescribethework,activity,operation,prac- ticeorfunctiontobecoveredbythepermitforwhichap- plication is made. 2. Describethelandonwhichtheproposedwork,activity, operation,practiceorfunctionistobedonebylegalde- scription, street address or similar description that will readilyidentifyanddefinitelylocatetheproposedbuild- ing, work, activity, operation, practice or function. 3. Indicate the use or occupancy for which the proposed work, activity, operation, practice or function is in- tended. 4. Be accompanied by plans, diagrams, computation and specificationsand other data as required in Section 106 of this code. 5. State the valuation of any new building or structure or any addition, remodeling or alteration to an existing building. 6. Besignedbytheapplicantortheapplicant’sauthorized agent. 7. Givesuchotherdataandinformationasmayberequired by the code official. 105.5 Permit approval.Before a permit is issued, the code official, or an authorized representative, shall review and ap- prove all permitted uses, occupancies or structures. Where lawsorregulationsareenforceablebyotheragenciesordepart- ments, a joint approval shall be obtained from all agencies or departments concerned. 105.6 Permit issuance.The application, plans, specifica- tions and other datafiledby an applicantfor apermit shallbe reviewedbythecodeofficial.Ifthecodeofficialfindsthatthe work described in an application for a permit and the plan, specificationsandotherdatafiledtherewithconformtothere- quirements of thiscode, the code officialisallowed to issue a permit to the applicant. When the code official issues the permit, the code official shall endorse in writing or stamp the plans and specifications APPROVED.Suchapprovedplansandspecificationsshallnot bechanged,modifiedoralteredwithoutauthorizationfromthe codeofficial,andallworkregulatedbythiscodeshallbedone in accordance with the approved plans. 105.7 Validity of permit.The issuance or granting of aper- mitorapprovalofplans,specificationsandcomputationsshall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violationofanyoftheprovisionsofthiscodeorofanyotheror- dinanceofthejurisdiction.Permitspresumingtogiveauthority to violateor conceal the provisions of this code or other ordi- nances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. 105.8 Expiration.Every permit issued by the code official undertheprovisionsofthiscodeshallexpirebylimitationand becomenullandvoidifthebuilding,useorworkauthorizedby suchpermitisnotcommencedwithin180daysfromthedateof suchpermit,orifthebuilding,useorworkauthorizedbysuch permitissuspendedorabandonedatanytimeaftertheworkis commenced for a period of 180 days. Any permittee holding an unexpired permit may apply for anextensionofthetimewithinwhichworkmaycommenceun- derthatpermitwhenthepermitteeisunabletocommencework withinthetimerequired by thissectionfor good and satisfac- toryreasons. Thecodeofficialmayextendthetimefor action bythepermitteeforaperiodnotexceeding180daysonwritten request by the permittee showing that circumstances beyond the control of the permittee have prevented action from being taken. No permit shall be extended more than once. 105.9 Retentionofpermits.Permitsshallatalltimesbekept onthepremisesdesignatedthereinandshallatalltimesbesub- jecttoinspectionbythecodeofficialorotherauthorizedrepre- sentative. 105.10 Revocation of permits.Permits issued under this codemaybesuspendedorrevokedwhenitisdeterminedbythe code official that: 1. Itisusedbyapersonotherthanthepersontowhomthe permit was issued. 2. Itisusedforalocationotherthanthatforwhichtheper- mit was issued. 3. Anyoftheconditionsorlimitationssetforthintheper- mit have been violated. 4. The permittee fails, refuses or neglects to comply with anyorderornoticedulyservedonhimundertheprovi- sions of this code within the time provided therein. 5. Therehasbeenanyfalsestatementormisrepresentation as to material fact in the application or plans on which the permit or application was made. 6. Whenthepermitisissuedinerrororinviolationofany other ordinance, regulations or provisions of this code. Thecodeofficialisallowedto,inwriting,suspendorrevoke apermitissuedundertheprovisionsofthiscodewheneverthe permitisissuedinerrororonthebasisofincorrectinformation supplied,orinviolationofanyordinanceorregulationorany of the provisions of this code. SECTION106 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 106.1 General.Plans,engineering calculations, diagrams andotherdatashallbesubmittedinatleasttwosetswitheach applicationforapermit.Whensuchplansarenotpreparedby anarchitectorengineer,thecodeofficialmayrequiretheappli- cant submitting such plans or other data to demonstrate that state law does not require that the plans be prepared by a li- ADMINISTRATION 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 3 301_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen censed architect or engineer. The code official may require plans,computationsandspecificationstobeprepared andde- signedbyanarchitectorengineerlicensedbythestatetoprac- tice as such even if not required by state law. Exception:Submissionofplans,calculations,construction inspectionrequirementsandotherdata,ifitisfoundthatthe natureoftheworkappliedforissuchthatreviewingofplans is not necessary to obtain compliance with this code. 106.2 Information on plans and specifications.Plans and specificationsshallbedrawntoscaleuponsubstantialpaperor cloth and shall be of sufficientclarityto indicatethe location, natureandextentoftheworkproposed,andshowindetailthat it will conform to the provisions of this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. 106.3 Site plan.In addition to the requirements for plans in the InternationalBuildingCode,siteplansshallincludetopog- raphy, width and percent of grade of access roads, landscape andvegetationdetails,locationsofstructuresorbuildingenve- lopes,existingorproposedoverheadutilities,occupancyclas- sificationofbuildings,typesofignition-resistantconstruction of buildings, structures and their appendages, roof classifica- tion of buildings, and site water supply systems. 106.4 Vegetationmanagementplans.Whenutilizedbythe permitapplicantpursuant toSection502, vegetationmanage- mentplansshallbepreparedandshallbesubmittedtothecode officialforreviewandapprovalaspartoftheplansrequiredfor a permit. See Appendix B. 106.5 Fireprotectionplan.Whenrequiredbythecodeoffi- cialpursuanttoSection405,afireprotectionplanshallbepre- paredandshallbesubmittedtothecodeofficialforreviewand approved as a part of the plans required for a permit. 106.6 Otherdataandsubstantiation.Whenrequiredbythe codeofficial,theplansandspecificationsshallincludeclassifi- cationoffuelloading,fuelmodellight,mediumorheavy,and substantiatingdatatoverifyclassificationoffire-resistiveveg- etation. 106.7 Vicinity plan.In addition to the requirements for site plans, plans shallinclude detailsregarding the vicinitywithin 300feet(91440mm)ofpropertylines,includingotherstruc- tures,slope,vegetation,fuelbreaks,watersupplysystemsand access roads. 106.8 Retentionofplans.Onesetofapprovedplans,specifi- cationsandcomputationsshallberetainedbythecodeofficial foraperiodofnotlessthan90daysfromdateofcompletionof the work covered therein; and one set of approved plans and specifications shall be returned to the applicant, and said set shallbekeptonthesiteofthebuilding,useorworkatalltimes during which the work authorized thereby is in progress. SECTION107 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 107.1 Inspection. 107.1.1 General.All construction or work for which a permitisrequiredbythiscodeshallbesubjecttoinspection bythecodeofficialandallsuchconstructionorworkshall remainaccessibleandexposedforinspectionpurposesuntil approved by the code official. It shall be the duty of the permit applicant to cause the work to remain accessible and exposed for inspection pur- poses.Neitherthecodeofficialnorthejurisdictionshallbe liableforexpenseentailedintheremovalorreplacementof any material required to allow inspection. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be con- strued to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of thiscodeorofotherordinances ofthejurisdiction.Inspec- tions presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisionsofthiscodeorofotherordinancesofthejurisdic- tion shall not be valid. Asurveyofthelotmayberequiredbythecodeofficialto verify that the mitigation features are provided and the building or structure is located in accordance with the ap- proved plans. 107.1.2 Authority to inspect.The code official shall in- spect,asoftenasnecessary,buildingsandpremises,includ- ingsuchotherhazardsorappliancesdesignatedbythecode official for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be correctedanyconditionsthatcouldreasonablybeexpected to cause fire or contribute to its spread, or any violation of thepurposeofthiscodeandofanyotherlaworstandardaf- fecting fire safety. 107.1.3 Reinspections.To determine compliance with thiscode,thecodeofficialmaycauseastructuretoberein- spected.Afeemaybeassessedforeachinspectionorrein- spectionwhensuchportionofworkforwhichinspectionis calledisnotcompleteorwhencorrectionscalledforarenot made. Reinspection fees may be assessed when the approved plansarenotreadilyavailabletotheinspector,forfailureto provideaccessonthedateforwhichinspectionisrequested or for deviating from plans requiring the approval of the code official. Toobtainareinspection,theapplicantshallpaytherein- spection fee as set forth in the fee schedule adopted by the jurisdiction.Whenreinspectionfeeshavebeenassessed,no additionalinspectionoftheworkwillbeperformeduntilthe required fees have been paid. 107.2 Enforcement. 107.2.1 Authorizationtoissuecorrectiveordersandno- tices.Whenthecodeofficialfindsanybuildingorpremises thatare in violation of thiscode, the code officialisautho- rized to issue corrective orders and notices. 107.2.2 Service of orders and notices.Orders and no- tices authorized or required by this code shall be given or servedontheowner,operator,occupantorotherpersonre- sponsiblefortheconditionorviolationeitherbyverbalnoti- fication, personal service, or delivering the same to, and leavingitwith,apersonofsuitableageanddiscretiononthe premises;or,ifnosuchpersonisfoundonthepremises,by affixingacopythereofinaconspicuousplaceonthedoorto theentranceofsaidpremisesandbymailingacopythereof tosuchpersonbyregisteredorcertifiedmailtotheperson’s last known address. ADMINISTRATION 4 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 401_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Orders or notices that are given verbally shall be con- firmed by service in writing as herein provided. 107.3 Right of entry.Whenever necessary to make an in- spectiontoenforceanyoftheprovisionsofthiscode,orwhen- everthecodeofficialhasreasonablecausetobelievethatthere exists in any building or on any premises any condition that makessuchbuildingorpremisesunsafe,thecodeofficialisau- thorized to enter such building or premises at all reasonable timestoinspectthesameortoperformanydutyauthorizedby this code, provided that if such building or premises is occu- pied,thecodeofficialshallfirstpresentpropercredentialsand request entry; and ifsuch building or premises isunoccupied, thecodeofficialshallfirstmakeareasonableefforttolocatethe ownerorotherpersonshavingchargeorcontrolofthebuilding or premises and request entry. Ifsuchentryisrefused,thecodeofficialshallhaverecourse toeveryremedy providedbylawtosecureentry.Owners, oc- cupantsoranyotherpersonshavingcharge,careorcontrolof anybuildingorpremises,shall,afterproperrequestismadeas hereinprovided,promptlypermitentrythereinbythecodeof- ficialforthepurposeofinspectionandexaminationpursuantto this code. 107.4 Compliance with orders and notices. 107.4.1 General compliance.Orders and notices issued orservedasprovidedbythiscodeshallbecompliedwithby the owner, operator, occupant or other person responsible for the condition or violation to which the corrective order or notice pertains. Ifthebuildingorpremisesisnotoccupied, suchcorrec- tive orders or notices shall be complied with by the owner. 107.4.2 Compliance with tags.A building or premises shallnotbeusedwheninviolationofthiscodeasnotedona tag affixed in accordance with Section 107.4.1. 107.4.3 Removal and destruction of signs and tags.A signortagpostedoraffixedbythecodeofficialshallnotbe mutilated, destroyed or removed without authorization by the code official. 107.4.4 Citations.Persons operating or maintaining an occupancy,premisesorvehiclesubjecttothiscodewhoal- lowahazardtoexistorfailtotakeimmediateactiontoabate a hazard on such occupancy, premises or vehicle when or- deredornotifiedtodosobythecodeofficialshallbeguilty of a misdemeanor. 107.4.5 Unsafe conditions.Buildings, structures or pre- misesthatconstitutea firehazard or are otherwise danger- ous to human life, or which in relation to existing use constituteahazardtosafetyorhealthorpublicwelfare,by reason of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsoles- cence,firehazard,disasterdamageorabandonmentasspec- ified in this code or any other ordinance, are unsafe conditions.Unsafebuildingsorstructuresshallnotbeused. Unsafebuildingsareherebydeclaredtobepublicnuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or removal, pursuant to applicable state and local laws and codes. SECTION108 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION No building, structure or premises shall be used or occupied, and no change in the existing occupancy classification of a building, structure, premise or portion thereof shall be made until the code official has issued a certificate of completion thereforasprovidedherein.Thecertificateofoccupancyshall notbeissueduntilthecertificateofcompletionindicatingthat theprojectisincompliancewiththiscodehasbeenissuedby the code official. Issuanceofacertificateofoccupancyshallnotbeconstrued asanapprovalofaviolationoftheprovisionsofthiscodeorof otherpertinentlawsandordinancesofthejurisdiction.Certifi- catespresumingtogiveauthoritytoviolateorcanceltheprovi- sionsofthiscodeorotherlawsorordinancesofthejurisdiction shall not be valid. ADMINISTRATION 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 5 501_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 6 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 601_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\01_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:15:05 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 201 GENERAL 201.1 Scope.Unless otherwise expressly stated, the follow- ing words and terms shall, for the purposes of this code, have the meanings shown in this chapter. 201.2 Interchangeability.Words stated in the present tense include the future; words stated in the masculine gender in- clude the feminine and neuter, and the singular number in- cludes the plural and the plural the singular. 201.3 Terms defined in other codes.Where terms are not defined in this code and are defined in other International Codes,suchtermsshallhavethemeaningsascribedtothemas in those codes. 201.4 Terms not defined.Where terms are not defined through the methods authorized by this section, such terms shallhavetheirordinarilyacceptedmeaningssuchasthecon- text implies. SECTION202 DEFINITIONS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.Abuildingorstructureusedto shelter or support any material, equipment, chattel or occu- pancy other than a habitable building. APPROVED.Approvalbythecodeofficialastheresultofre- view,investigationortestsconductedbythecodeofficialorby reasonofacceptedprinciplesortestsbynationalauthorities,or technical or scientific organizations. BRUSH, SHORT.Low-growingspeciesthatreachheightsof1 to3feet.Sagebrush,snowberryandrabbitbrusharesomevariet- ies. BRUSH, TALL.Arbor-like varieties of brush species and/or shortvarietiesofbroad-leaftreesthatgrowincompactgroupsor clumps.Thesegroupsorclumpsreachheightsof4to20feet.In Utah,thisincludesprimaryvarietiesofoak,maples,chokecherry, serviceberryandmahogany,butmayalsoincludeotherspecies. BUILDING.Anystructureusedorintendedforsupportingor sheltering any use or occupancy. BUILDING OFFICIAL.The officer or other designated au- thoritychargedwiththeadministrationandenforcementofthe InternationalBuildingCode,orthebuildingofficial’sdulyau- thorized representative. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION.Written documenta- tionthattheprojectorworkforwhichapermitwasissuedhas been completed in conformance with requirements of this code. CODE OFFICIAL.Theofficialdesignatedbythejurisdiction tointerpretandenforcethiscode,orthecodeofficial’sautho- rized representative. DEFENSIBLE SPACE.Anareaeithernaturalorman-made, wherematerialcapableofallowingafiretospreadunchecked hasbeentreated,clearedormodifiedtoslowtherateandinten- sityofanadvancingwildfireandtocreateanareaforfiresup- pression operations to occur. DRIVEWAY.Avehicularingressandegressroutethatserves nomorethantwobuildingsorstructures,notincludingacces- sory structures, or more than five dwelling units. FIRE AREA.The floor area, in square feet (square meters), used to determine the adequate water supply. FIRE CHIEF.The chief officer or the chief officer’s autho- rizedrepresentativeofthefiredepartmentservingthejurisdic- tion. FIRE PROTECTION PLAN.A document prepared for a specificprojectordevelopmentproposed forthewildland-ur- baninterfacearea.Itdescribeswaystominimizeandmitigate the fire problems created by the project or development, with thepurposeofreducingimpactonthecommunity’sfireprotec- tion delivery system. FIRE WEATHER.Weatherconditionsfavorabletotheigni- tion and rapid spread of fire. In wildfires, this generally in- cludeshightemperaturescombinedwithstrongwindsandlow humidity. FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED CONSTRUCTION.Theuse of materials and systems in the design and construction of a building or structure to safeguard against the spread of fire withinabuildingorstructureandthespreadoffiretoorfrom buildings or structures to the wildland-urban interface area. FLAME SPREAD RATING.Asusedhereinreferstorating obtainedaccordingtotestsconductedasspecifiedbyanation- ally recognized standard. FUEL BREAK.Anarea,strategicallylocatedforfightingan- ticipated fires, where the native vegetation has been perma- nentlymodifiedorreplacedsothatfiresburningintoitcanbe moreeasilycontrolled.Fuelbreaksdividefire-proneareasinto smaller areas for easier fire control and to provide access for fire fighting. FUEL, HEAVY.Vegetationconsistingofroundwood3inches (76 mm) or larger in diameter. The amount of fuel (vegetation) wouldbe6tonsperacreorgreater. FUEL, LIGHT.Vegetationconsistingofherbaceousandround woodlessthan 1/4 inch(6.4mm)indiameter.Theamountoffuel (vegetation)wouldbe 1/2 tonto2tonsperacre. FUEL, MEDIUM.Vegetationconsistingofroundwood 1/4 to3 inches(6.4mmto76mm)indiameter. Theamountoffuel(vegeta- tion)wouldbe2to6tonsperacre. FUEL MODIFICATION.A method of modifying fuel load byreducingtheamountofnonfire-resistivevegetationoralter- ing the type of vegetation to reduce the fuel load. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 7 CHAPTER 2 DEFINITIONS 102_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\02_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:21:18 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen FUEL MOSAIC.Afuelmodificationsystemthatprovidesfor the creation of islands and irregular boundaries to reduce the visual and ecological impact of fuel modification. FUEL-LOADING.The oven-dry weight of fuels in a given area,usuallyexpressedinpounds peracre(lb/a)(kg/ha).Fuel loading may be referenced to fuel size or timelag categories, and may include surface fuels or total fuels. GREENBELT.A fuel break designated for a use other than fire protection. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.As defined in the Interna- tional Fire Code. HEAVY TIMBER CONSTRUCTION.As described in the International Building Code. INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE (ISO).An agency that recommends fire insurance rates based on a grading schedule that incorporates evaluation of fire fighting resources and capabilities. LEGISLATIVE BODY.Thegoverningbodyofthepoliticalju- risdictionadministeringthiscode. LOG WALL CONSTRUCTION.A type of construction in which exterior walls are constructed of solid wood members and where the smallest horizontal dimension of each solid wood member is at least 6 inches (152 mm). MULTILAYERED GLAZED PANELS.Window or door assemblies that consist of two or more independently glazed panelsinstalledparalleltoeachother,havingasealedairgapin between, within a frame designed to fill completely the win- dow or door opening in which the assembly is intended to be installed. NONCOMBUSTIBLE.As applied to building construction materialmeansamaterialthat,intheforminwhichitisused,is either one of the following: 1. Materialofwhichnopartwilligniteandburnwhensub- jectedtofire.AnymaterialconformingtoASTME136 shallbeconsiderednoncombustiblewithinthemeaning of this section. 2. Materialhavingastructuralbaseofnoncombustiblema- terialasdefinedinItem1above,withasurfacingmate- rialnot over 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) thick,which has aflame- spread rating of 50 or less.Flame-spread rating asused herein refers to rating obtained according to tests con- ducted as specified in ASTM E 84. “Noncombustible” does not apply to surface finish materi- als.Materialrequiredtobenoncombustibleforreducedclear- ances to flues, heating appliances or other sources of high temperature shall refer to material conforming to Item 1. No material shall be classed as noncombustible that is subject to increase in combustibility or flame-spread rating, beyond the limits herein established, through the effects of age, moisture or other atmospheric condition. NONCOMBUSTIBLE ROOF COVERING.Oneofthefol- lowing: 1. Cement shingles or sheets. 2. Exposed concrete slab roof. 3. Ferrous or copper shingles or sheets. 4. Slate shingles. 5. Clay or concrete roofing tile. 6. Approved roof covering of noncombustible material. SLOPE.Thevariationofterrainfromthehorizontal;thenum- beroffeet(meters)riseorfallper100feet(30480mm)mea- sured horizontally, expressed as a percentage. STRUCTURE.That which is built or constructed, an edifice orbuildingofanykind,oranypieceofworkartificiallybuiltup or composed of parts joined together in some manner. TREE CROWN.Theprimaryandsecondarybranchesgrow- ing out from the main stem, together with twigs and foliage. UNENCLOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.An acces- sorystructurewithoutacompleteexteriorwallsystemenclos- ing the area under roof or floor above. WILDFIRE.An uncontrolled fire spreading through vegeta- tive fuels, exposing and possibly consuming structures. WILDLAND.An area in which development is essentially nonexistent,exceptforroads,railroads,powerlinesandsimilar facilities. WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE.The line, area or zone wherestructuresorotherhumandevelopment(includingcritical infrastructure that if destroyed would result in hardship to com- munities)meetorinterminglewithundevelopedwildlandorveg- etativefuel. DEFINITIONS 8 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 202_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\02_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:21:18 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 301 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA DESIGNATIONS 301.1 Declaration.The legislative body shall declare the wildland-urban interface areas within the jurisdiction. The urban-wildlandinterfaceareasshallbebasedonthemapscre- ated in accordance with Section 301. 301.2 Mapping.Incooperation,thecodeofficialandtheDivi- sion of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) wildfire repre- sentative (per participating agreement between county and FFSL) will create or review Wildland-Urban Interface Area maps,toberecordedandfiledwiththeclerkofthejurisdiction. These areas shall become effective immediately thereafter. 301.3 Review of wildland-urban interface areas.The code official and the FFSL wildfire representative shall reevaluate and recommend modification to the wildland-urban interface areasinaccordancewithSection301.1onathree-yearbasisor more frequently as deemed necessary by the legislative body. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 9 CHAPTER 3 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREAS 103_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\03_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:31:56 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 10 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 203_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\03_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:31:56 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION401 GENERAL 401.1 Scope.Wildland-urban interface areas shall be pro- vided with emergency vehicle access and water supply in ac- cordance with this chapter. 401.2 Objective.Theobjectiveofthischapteristoestablish the minimum requirements for emergency vehicle access and water supply for buildings and structures located in the wildland-urban interface areas. 401.3 General safety precautions.General safety precau- tionsshallbeinaccordancewiththischapter.SeealsoAppen- dix A. SECTION 402 APPLICABILITY 402.1 Subdivisions. 402.1.1 Access.New subdivisions, as determined by this jurisdiction, shall be provided with fire apparatus access roads in accordance with the International Fire Code and access requirements in accordance with Section 403. 402.1.2 Water supply.New subdivisions as determined by this jurisdiction shall be provided with water supply in accordance with Section 404. 402.2 Individual structures. 402.2.1 Access.Individual structures hereafter con- structedorrelocatedintoorwithinwildland-urbaninterface areasshallbeprovidedwithfireapparatusaccessinaccor- dancewiththe International Fire Code anddrivewaysinac- cordance with Section 403.2. Marking of fire protection equipment shall be provided in accordance with Section 403.5andaddressmarkersshallbeprovidedinaccordance with Section 403.6. 402.2.2 Water supply.Individual structures hereafter constructed or relocated into or within wildland-urban in- terfaceareasshallbeprovidedwithaconformingwatersup- ply in accordance with Section 404. Exceptions: 1. Structures constructed to meet the requirements for the class of ignition-resistant construction specifiedinTable503.1foranonconformingwa- ter supply. 2. Buildings containing only private garages, car- ports, sheds and agricultural buildings with a floor area of not more than 600 square feet (56 m2). SECTION 403 ACCESS 403.1 Restrictedaccess.Whereemergencyvehicleaccessis restricted because of secured access roads or driveways or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or fire- fighting purposes, the code official is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an accessiblelocation. The key box shallbeof atypeapprovedby thecode officialand shallcon- tainkeystogainnecessaryaccessasrequiredbythecodeoffi- cial. 403.2 Driveways.Driveways shall be provided when any portionofanexteriorwallofthefirststoryofabuildingislo- catedmorethan150feet(45720mm)fromafireapparatusac- cess road. Driveways shall provide a minimum unobstructed width of 12 feet (3658 mm) and a minimum unobstructed heightof 13 feet6inches(4115 mm). Drivewaysinexcessof 150 feet (45 720 mm) in length shall be provided with turn- arounds. Driveways in excess of 200 feet (60 960 mm) in length and less than 20 feet (6096 mm) in width shall be pro- vided with turnouts in addition to turnarounds. Adrivewayshallnotserveinexcessoffivedwellingunits. Drivewayturnarounds shallhaveinsideturningradiiofnot lessthan30feet(9144mm)andoutsideturningradiiofnotless than45feet(13716mm).Drivewaysthatconnectwitharoad orroadsatmorethanonepointmaybeconsideredashavinga turnaround if all changes of direction meet the radii require- ments for driveway turnarounds. Driveway turnouts shall be an all-weather road surface at least 10 feet (3048 mm) wide and 30 feet (9144 mm) long. Drivewayturnoutsshallbelocatedasrequiredbythecodeoffi- cial. Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges on driveways and private roads. Design loads for bridges shall be established by the code official. 403.3 Fire apparatus access road.When required, fire ap- paratus access roads shall be all-weather roads with a mini- mumwidthof20feet(6096mm)andaclearheightof13feet6 inches(4115mm);shallbedesignedtoaccommodatetheloads andturning radiifor fireapparatus;andhaveagradientnego- tiablebythespecificfireapparatusnormallyusedatthatloca- tion within the jurisdiction. Dead-end roads in excess of 150 feet(45720mm)inlengthshallbeprovidedwithturnarounds as approved by the code official. An all-weather road surface shallbeanysurfacematerialacceptabletothecodeofficialthat wouldnormallyallowthepassageofemergencyservicevehi- clestoprotectstructuresandwildlandswithin the jurisdiction. 403.4 Markingofroads.Approvedsignsorotherapproved noticesshallbeprovidedandmaintainedforaccessroadsand driveways to identify such roads and prohibit the obstruction thereof or both. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 11 CHAPTER 4 WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 104_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen All road identification signs and supports shall be of noncombustible materials.Signs shall have minimum 4-inch- high(102mm)reflectiveletterswith 1/2 inch(12.7mm)stroke on a contrasting 6-inch-high (152 mm) sign. Road identifica- tionsignageshallbemountedataheightof7feet(2134 mm) from the road surface to the bottom of the sign. 403.5 Marking of fire protection equipment.Fire protec- tionequipmentandfirehydrantsshallbeclearlyidentifiedina manner approved by the code official to prevent obstruction. 403.6 Address markers.All buildings shall have a perma- nentlypostedaddress,whichshallbeplacedateachdriveway entranceandbevisiblefrombothdirectionsoftravelalongthe road.Inallcases,theaddressshallbepostedatthebeginningof construction and shall be maintained thereafter, and the ad- dressshallbevisibleandlegiblefromtheroadonwhichthead- dress is located. Address signs along one-way roads shall be visible from boththeintendeddirectionoftravelandtheoppositedirection. Wheremultipleaddressesarerequiredatasingledriveway, they shall be mounted on a single post, and additional signs shall be posted at locations where driveways divide. Where a roadway provides access solely to a single com- mercialorindustrialbusiness,theaddresssignshallbeplaced at the nearest road intersection providing access to that site. 403.7 Grade.The gradient for fire apparatus access roads anddrivewaysshallnotexceedthemaximumapprovedbythe codeofficial.Itwillbeuptothecodeofficialtoascertainthestan- dardbasedonlocalfireequipmentgradenottoexceed12percent. SECTION404 WATER SUPPLY 404.1 General.When provided in order to qualify as a con- forming water supply for the purpose of Table 503.1, an ap- proved water source shall have an adequate water supply for the use of the fire protection service to protect buildings and structures from exterior fire sources or to suppress structure fires within the wildland-urban interface area of the jurisdic- tion in accordance with this section. 404.2 Water sources.The point at which a water source is availableforuseshallbelocatednotmorethan1,000feet(305 m)fromthebuildingandbeapprovedbythecodeofficial.The distanceshallbemeasuredalonganunobstructedlineoftravel. Water sources shall comply with the following: 1. Man-made water sources shall have a minimum usable watervolumeasdeterminedbytheadequatewatersup- plyneeds inaccordance withSection404.5. Thiswater sourceshallbeequippedwithanapprovedhydrant.The water level of the water source shall be maintained by rainfall, water pumped from a well, water hauled by a tanker,orbyseasonalhighwaterofastreamorriver.The design,construction,location,waterlevelmaintenance, access, and access maintenance of man-made water sources shall be approved by the code official. 2. Naturalwatersourcesshallhaveaminimumannualwa- ter level or flow sufficient to meet the adequate water supplyneedsinaccordancewithSection404.5.Thiswa- terlevelorflowshallnotberendered unusablebecause of freezing. This water source shall have an approved draftsitewithanapprovedhydrant.Adequatewaterflow andrightsforaccesstothewatersourceshallbeensured in a form acceptable to the code official. 404.3 Draft sites.Approved draft sites shall be provided at allnaturalwatersourcesintendedforuseasfireprotectionfor compliancewiththiscode.Thedesign,construction,location, accessandaccessmaintenanceofdraftsitesshallbeapproved by the code official. Thepumperaccesspointshallbeeitheranemergencyvehi- cle access area alongside a conforming access road or an ap- proveddrivewaynolongerthan150feet(45720mm).Pumper accesspointsandaccessdrivewaysshallbedesignedandcon- structedinaccordancewithallcodesandordinancesenforced bythisjurisdiction.Pumperaccesspointsshallnotrequirethe pumper apparatus to obstruct a road or driveway. 404.4 Hydrants.All hydrants shall be designed and con- structed in accordance with nationally recognized standards. Thelocationandaccessshallbeapprovedbythecodeofficial. 404.5 Adequatewatersupply.Adequatewatersupplyshall be determined for purposes of initial attack and flame front controlbythelocaljurisdiction.NFPA 1142maybeusedasaref- erence. 404.6 Fire department.The water system required by this code can only be considered conforming for purposes of deter- mining the level of ignition-resistant construction (see Table 503.1). 404.7 Obstructions.Accesstoallwatersourcesrequiredby this code shall be unobstructed at all times. The code official shall not be deterred or hindered from gaining immediate ac- cess to water source equipment, fire protection equipment or hydrants. 404.8 Identification.Watersources,draftsites,hydrantsand fireprotectionequipmentshallbeclearlyidentifiedinamanner approvedbythecodeofficialtoidentifylocationandtoprevent obstruction by parking and other obstructions. 404.9 Testing and maintenance.Water sources, draft sites, hydrants and other fire protection equipment required by this code shall be subject to periodic tests as required by the code official.Codeofficialshallestablishaperiodictestingschedule. Costsaretobecoveredbythewaterprovider.Allsuchequipment installedundertheprovisionsofthiscodeshallbemaintained inanoperativeconditionatalltimesandshallberepairedorre- placedwheredefective.Additions,repairs,alterationsandser- vicingofsuchfireprotectionequipmentandresourcesshallbe in accordance with approved standards. Mains and appurte- nancesshallbeinstalledinaccordancewithNFPA24.Watertanks for private fire protection shall be installed in accordance with NFPA22.Thecostsaretobecoveredbythewaterprovider. 404.10 Reliability. 404.10.1 Objective.Theobjectiveofthissectionistoin- creasethereliabilityofwatersuppliesbyreducingtheexpo- sure of vegetative fuels to electrically powered systems. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 12 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 204_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 404.10.2 Clearance of fuel.Defensible space shall be providedaroundwatertankstructures,watersupplypumps and pump houses in accordance with Section 603. 404.10.3 Standby power.Stationary water supply facili- ties within the wildland-urban interface area dependent on electricalpowersuppliedbypowergridtomeetadequatewa- tersupplydemandsshallprovidefunctionalstandbypower systemsinaccordance withtheICC Electrical Code toen- sure that an uninterrupted water supply is maintained. The standby power source shall be capable of providing power for a minimum of two hours. Exceptions:When approved by the code official, a standby power supply is not required where the primary powerservicetothestationarywatersupplyfacilityisun- dergroundorthereisanon-sitegenerator. SECTION405 FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 405.1Purpose.Theplanistoprovideabasistodetermineoverall compliancewiththiscode,fordeterminationofIgnitionResistant Construction (IRC) (see Table 503.1) and for determining the needforalternativematerialsandmethods. 405.2 General.Whenrequiredbythecodeofficial,afirepro- tection plan shall be prepared and approved prior to the first buildingpermitissuanceorsubdivisionapproval. 405.3 Content.The plan shall be based upon a site-specific wildfire risk assessment that includes considerations of loca- tion, topography, aspect, flammable vegetation, climatic con- ditions and fire history. The plan shall address water supply, access,buildingignitionandfire-resistancefactors,fireprotec- tion systems and equipment, defensible space and vegetation management. 405.4 Cost.The cost of fire protection plan preparation and review shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 405.5 Plan retention.The fire protection plan shall be re- tained by the code official. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA REQUIREMENTS 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 13 304_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 14 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 404_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\04_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:20:21 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 501 GENERAL 501.1 Scope.Buildings and structures shall be constructed in accordancewiththe InternationalBuildingCode andthiscode. Exceptions: 1. Accessory structures not exceeding 120 square feet (11m2)infloorareawhenlocatedatleast50feet(15 240mm)frombuildingscontaininghabitablespaces. 2. Agricultural buildings at least 50 feet (15 240 mm) from buildings containing habitable spaces. 501.2 Objective.The objective of this chapter is to establish minimum standards to locate, design and construct buildings andstructuresorportionsthereoffortheprotectionoflifeand property,toresistdamagefromwildfires,andtomitigatebuild- ing and structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. The minimumstandardssetforthinthischaptervarywiththecriti- cal fire weather, slope and fuel type to provide increased pro- tection, above the requirements set forth in the International Building Code, from the various levels of hazards. SECTION 502 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY Thefirehazardseverityofbuildingsitesforallbuildingshere- after constructed, modified or relocated into wildland-urban interfaceareasshallbeestablishedinaccordancewithAppen- dix C. Thefirehazard severityisallowedtobereduced by imple- mentingavegetationmanagementplaninaccordancewithAp- pendix B. SECTION 503 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 503.1 General.Buildingsandstructureshereafterconstructed, modified or relocated into or within wildland-urban interface areas shall meet the construction requirements in accordance withTable503.1.Class1,Class2orClass3ignition-resistant constructionshallbeinaccordancewithSections504,505and 506, respectively. SECTION 504 CLASS 1 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 504.1 General.Class1ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 504. 504.2 Roof covering.RoofsshallhaveaClassAroofcovering oraClassAroofassembly.Forroofcoveringswherethepro- fileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdecking, thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtoprecludeentry of flames or embers. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 15 CHAPTER 5 SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS TABLE 503.1 IGNITION-RESISTANTCONSTRUCTIONa DEFENSIBLE SPACEc FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY Moderate Hazard High Hazard Extreme Hazard Water Supplyb Water Supplyb Water Supplyb Conformingd Nonconforminge Conformingd Nonconforminge Conformingd Nonconforminge Nonconforming IR 2 IR 1 IR 1 IR 1 N.C. IR 1 N.C.Not Permitted Conforming IR 3 IR 2 IR 2 IR 1 IR 1 IR 1 N.C. 1.5 x Conforming Not Required IR 3 IR 3 IR 2 IR 2 IR 1 a. Access shall be in accordance with Section 402. b. Subdivisions shall have a conforming water supply in accordance with Section 402.1. IR 1 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 504. IR 2 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 505. IR 3 = Ignition-resistant construction in accordance with Section 506. N.C. = Exteriorwallsshallhaveafire-resistanceratingofnotlessthan1-hourandtheexteriorsurfacesofsuchwallsshallbenoncombustible.Usageoflogwall construction is allowed. c. Conformance based on Section 603. d.Conformance based on Section 404. e. AnonconformingwatersupplyisanywatersystemorsourcethatdoesnotcomplywithSection404,includingsituationswherethereisnowatersupplyforstruc- ture protection or fire suppression. 105_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 504.3 Protection of eaves.Eavesandsoffitsshallbeprotected on the exposed underside by materials approved for a mini- mum of 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction. Fascias are required and must be protected on the backside by materials approved for a minimum of 1-hour fire-resistance-rated con- struction or 2-inch (51 mm) nominal dimension lumber. 504.4 Gutters and downspouts.Gutters and downspouts shall be constructed of noncombustible material. 504.5 Exterior walls.Exteriorwallsofbuildingsorstructures shallbeconstructedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof 1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstructionontheexteriorsideor constructed with approved noncombustible materials. Exception:Heavy timber or log wall construction. Suchmaterialshallextendfromthetopofthefoundationto the underside of the roof sheathing. 504.6 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with exterior walls in accordance with Section 504.5. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 504.7 Appendages and projections.Unenclosed accessory structuresattachedtobuildingswithhabitablespacesandpro- jections,suchasdecks,shallbeaminimumof1-hour fire-re- sistance-rated construction, heavy timber construction or constructed of approved noncombustible materials. When the attached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin 6inches(152mm)oftheground, withexteriorwallconstruc- tion in accordance with Section 504.5. 504.8 Exterior glazing.Exteriorwindows,windowwallsand glazed doors, windows within exterior doors, and skylights shall be tempered glass, multilayered glazed panels, glass block or have a fire protection rating of not less than 20 min- utes. 504.9 Exterior doors.Exterior doors shall be approved noncombustibleconstruction,solidcorewoodnotlessthan13/4 inchesthick(45mm),orhaveafireprotectionratingofnotless than20minutes.Windowswithindoorsandglazeddoorsshall be in accordance with Section 504.8. Exception:Vehicle access doors. 504.10 Vents.Atticventilationopenings,foundationorunder- floor vents, or other ventilation openings in vertical exterior walls and vents through roofs shall not exceed 144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustiblecorrosion-resistantmeshwithopeningsnotto exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). Attic ventilation openings shall not be located in soffits, in eaveoverhangs,betweenraftersateaves,orinotheroverhang areas.Gableend and dormer ventsshallbelocatedatleast10 feet (3048 mm) from property lines. Underfloor ventilation openings shall be located as close to grade as practical. 504.11 Detached accessory structures.Detached accessory structureslocatedlessthan50feet(15240mm)fromabuild- ing containing habitable space shall have exterior walls con- structedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof1-hourfire- resistance-ratedconstruction,heavytimber,logwallconstruc- tionorconstructedwithapprovednoncombustiblematerialson the exterior side. When the detached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 504.5 or underfloor protection in accordance with Section 504.6. Exception:Theenclosuremaybeomittedwheretheunder- side of all exposed floors and all exposed structural col- umns,beamsandsupportingwallsareprotectedasrequired for exterior 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction or heavy-timber construction. See Section 504.2 for roof requirements. SECTION 505 CLASS 2 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 505.1 General.Class2ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 505. 505.2 Roof covering.Roofs shallhaveatleastaClassA roof covering, Class B roof assembly or an approved noncombustible roof covering. For roof coverings where the profileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdeck- ing,thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtopreclude entry of flames or embers. 505.3 Protection of eaves.Combustibleeaves,fasciasandsof- fits shall be enclosed with solid materials with a minimum thickness of 3/4 inch (19 mm). No exposed rafter tailsshall be permitted unless constructed of heavy timber materials. 505.4 Gutters and downspouts.Guttersanddownspoutsshall be constructed of noncombustible material. 505.5 Exterior walls.Exteriorwallsofbuildingsorstructures shallbeconstructedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof 1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstructionontheexteriorsideor constructed with approved noncombustible materials. Exception:Heavy timber or log wall construction. Suchmaterialshallextendfromthetopofthefoundationto the underside of the roof sheathing. 505.6 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground, with exterior walls in accordance with Section 505.5. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 505.7 Appendages and projections.Unenclosed accessory structuresattachedtobuildingswithhabitablespacesandpro- jections, such as decks, shall be a minimum of 1-hour fire-re- SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 16 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 205_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:28 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen sistance-rated construction, heavy timber construction or constructed with approved noncombustible materials. When the attached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 505.5. 505.8 Exterior glazing.Exteriorwindows,windowwallsand glazed doors, windows within exterior doors, and skylights shall be tempered glass, multilayered glazed panels, glass block or have a fire-protection rating of not less than 20 min- utes. 505.9 Exterior doors.Exterior doors shall be approved noncombustible construction, solid core wood not less than 13/4-inchesthick(45mm),orhaveafireprotectionratingofnot lessthan20minutes.Windowswithindoorsandglazeddoors shall be in accordance with Section 505.8. Exception:Vehicle access doors. 505.10 Vents.Atticventilationopenings,foundationorunder- floor vents or other ventilation openings in vertical exterior walls and vents through roofs shall not exceed 144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustiblecorrosion-resistantmeshwithopeningsnotto exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). Attic ventilation openings shall not be located in soffits, in eaveoverhangs,betweenraftersateaves,orinotheroverhang areas. Gable end and dormer vents shallbe locatedatleast10 feet (3048 mm) from property lines. Underfloor ventilation openings shall be located as close to grade as practical. 505.11 Detached accessory structures.Detached accessory structureslocatedlessthan50feet(15240mm)fromabuild- ing containing habitable space shall have exterior walls con- structedwithmaterialsapprovedforaminimumof1-hourfire- resistance-ratedconstruction,heavytimber,logwallconstruc- tion,orconstructedwithapprovednoncombustiblematerialon the exterior side. When the detached structure is located and constructed so that the structure or any portion thereof projects over a de- scendingslopesurfacegreaterthan10percent,theareabelow thestructureshallhaveallunderfloorareasenclosedtowithin6 inches(152mm)oftheground,withexteriorwallconstruction in accordance with Section 505.5 or underfloor protection in accordance with Section 505.6. Exception:Theenclosuremaybeomittedwheretheunder- side of all exposed floors and all exposed structural col- umns,beamsandsupportingwallsareprotectedasrequired for exterior 1-hour fire-resistance-rated construction or heavy-timber construction. See Section 505.2 for roof requirements. SECTION 506 CLASS 3 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION 506.1 General.Class3ignition-resistantconstructionshallbe in accordance with Section 506. 506.2 Roof covering.Roofs shallhaveatleastaClassAroof covering, Class C roof assembly or an approved noncombustible roof covering. For roof coverings where the profileallowsaspacebetweentheroofcoveringandroofdeck- ing,thespaceattheeaveendsshallbefirestoppedtopreclude entry of flames or embers. 506.3 Unenclosed underfloor protection.Buildingsorstruc- tures shall have all underfloor areas enclosed to the ground with exterior walls. Exception:Completeenclosuremaybeomittedwherethe underside of all exposed floors and all exposed structural columns, beams and supporting walls are protected as re- quiredforexterior1-hourfire-resistance-ratedconstruction or heavy timber construction. 506.4 Vents.Attic ventilation openings, soffit vents, founda- tionorunderfloor ventsorotherventilationopenings inverti- calexteriorwallsandventsthroughroofsshallnotexceed144 square inches (0.0929 m2) each. Such vents shall be covered with noncombustible corrosion-resistant mesh with openings not to exceed 1/4 inch (6.4 mm). SECTION 507 REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF ROOF COVERINGS Theroofcoveringonbuildingsorstructuresinexistenceprior totheadoptionofthiscodethatarereplacedorhave25percent ormorereplacedina12-monthperiodshallbereplacedwitha roofcoveringrequiredfornewconstructionbasedonthetype ofignition-resistantconstructionspecifiedinaccordancewith Section 503. SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 17 305_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:29 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 18 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 405_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\05_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Friday, August 04, 2006 9:01:29 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION 601 GENERAL 601.1 Scope.The provisions of this chapter establish general requirements for new and existing buildings, structures and premises located within wildland-urban interface areas. 601.2 Objective.The objective of this chapter is to establish minimumrequirementstomitigatetherisktolifeandproperty from wildland fire exposures, exposures from adjacent struc- turesandtomitigatestructurefiresfromspreadingtowildland fuels. SECTION 602 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS DELETED SECTION 603 DEFENSIBLE SPACE 603.1 Objective.Provisions of this section are intended to modify the fuel load in areas adjacent to structures to createa defensible space. 603.2 Fuel modification.In order to qualify as a conforming defensiblespaceforindividualbuildingsorstructuresonaprop- erty,fuelmodificationshallbeprovidedwithinadistancefrom buildingsorstructuresasspecifiedinTable603.2.Forallother purposes, the fuel modification distance shall not be less than 30 feet (9144 mm) or to the property line, whichever is less. DistancesspecifiedinTable603.2shallbemeasuredonahori- zontalplanefromtheperimeterorprojectionofthebuildingor structureasshown inFigure 603.2. DistancesspecifiedinTa- ble 603.2 may be modified by the code official because of a site-specificanalysisbasedonlocalconditionsandthefirepro- tection plan. Personsowning,leasing,controlling,operatingormaintain- ing buildings or structures requiring defensible spaces are re- sponsible for modifying or removing nonfire-resistive vegetationonthepropertyowned,leasedorcontrolledbysaid person. Treesareallowedwithinthedefensiblespace,providedthe horizontaldistancebetweencrownsofadjacenttreesandover- headelectricalfacilitiesorunmodifiedfuelisnotlessthan10 feet (3048 mm). Deadwood and litter shall be regularly re- moved from trees. Where ornamental vegetative fuels or cultivated ground cover,suchasgreengrass,ivy,succulentsorsimilarplantsare usedasground cover,theyareallowedtobewithinthedesig- nated defensible space, provided they do not form ameans of transmitting fire from the native growth to any structure. TABLE 603.2 REQUIRED DEFENSIBLE SPACE WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA FUEL MODIFICATION DISTANCE (feet) Moderate hazard 30 High hazard 50 Extreme hazard 100 For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. 603.3 Community fuel modification zones.Fuel modification zones to protect new communities shall be provided when re- quiredbythecodeofficialinaccordancewithSection603,inor- dertoreducefuelloadsadjacenttocommunitiesandstructures. 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 19 CHAPTER 6 FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FIGURE 603.2 MEASUREMENTS OF FUEL MODIFICATION DISTANCE 106_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\06_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:42:52 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen 603.3.1 Land ownership.Fuelmodificationzonelandusedto protectacommunityshallbeunderthecontrolofanassocia- tionorothercommonownershipinstrumentforthelifeofthe communitytobeprotected. 603.3.2 Fuel modification zone plans.Fuel modification zoneplansshallbeapproved prior to fuelmodification work andshallbeplacedonasitegradingplanshowninplanview. Anelevationplanshallalsobeprovidedtoindicatethelength ofthefuelmodificationzoneontheslope.Fuelmodification zoneplansshallinclude,butnotbelimitedtothefollowing: 1. Plan showing existing vegetation. 2. Photographs showing natural conditions prior to work being performed. 3. Gradingplanshowinglocationofproposedbuildings and structures, and set backs from top of slope to all buildingsorstructures. SECTION 604 MAINTENANCE OF DEFENSIBLE SPACE 604.1 General.Defensible spaces required by Section 603 shall be maintained annually, or as necessary in accordance with Section 604. 604.2 Modified area.Nonfire-resistive vegetation or growth shall be kept clear of buildings or structures, in accordance withSection603,insuchamannerastoprovideaclearareafor fire suppression operations. 604.3 Responsibility.Persons owning, leasing, controlling, operating or maintaining buildings or structures are responsi- ble for maintenance of defensible spaces. Maintenance of the defensiblespaceshallincludemodifyingorremovingnonfire- resistivevegetationandkeepingleaves,needlesandotherdead vegetativematerialregularlyremovedfromroofsofbuildings and structures. 604.4 Trees.Individual trees and/or small clumps of trees or brush crowns, extending to within 10 feet (3048 mm) of any structure, shall be pruned to maintain a minimum horizontal clearanceof10feet(3048mm).Treecrownswithinthedefen- siblespaceshallbeprunedtoremovelimbslocatedlessthan6 feet(1829mm)abovethegroundsurfaceadjacenttothetrees. Portions of tree crowns that extend within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the outlet of a chimney shall be pruned to maintain a minimum horizontal clearance of 10 feet (3048 mm). Deadwoodandlittershallberegularlyremovedfromtrees. SECTION 605 SPARK ARRESTERS Chimneysservingfireplaces,barbecues,incineratorsordeco- rative heating appliances in which solid or liquid fuel isused, shallbeprovidedwithasparkarrester.Sparkarrestersshallbe constructed of woven or welded wire screening of 12 USA standard gage wire (0.1046 inch) (2.66 mm) having openings not exceeding 1/2 inch (12.7 mm). Thenetfreeareaofthespark arrestershallnotbelessthan four times the net free area of the outlet of the chimney. SECTION 606 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS INSTALLATIONS 606.1 General.ThestorageofLP-gasandtheinstallationand maintenance of pertinent equipment shall be in accordance withthe InternationalFireCode or,intheabsencethereof,rec- ognized standards. 606.2 Location of containers.LP-gas containers shall be lo- cated within the defensible space in accordance with the Interational Fire Code. SECTION 607 STORAGE OF FIREWOOD AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS Firewoodandcombustiblematerialshallnotbestoredinunen- closed spaces beneath buildings or structures, or on decks or undereaves,canopiesorotherprojectionsoroverhangs.When requiredbythecodeofficial,storageoffirewoodandcombus- tible material stored in the defensible space shall be located a minimumof30feet(9144mm)fromstructuresandseparated fromthecrownoftreesbyaminimumhorizontaldistanceof15 feet (4572 mm). Firewoodandcombustiblematerialsnotforconsumptionon thepremisesshallbestoredsoastonotposeahazard.SeeAp- pendix A. FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 20 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 206_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\06_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:42:52 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen SECTION A101 GENERAL A101.1 Scope.Theprovisionsofthisappendix establishgen- eralrequirementsapplicabletonewandexistingpropertieslo- cated within urban-wildland interface areas. A101.2Objective.Theobjectiveofthisappendixistoprovide necessaryfire-protectionmeasurestoreducethethreatofwild- fireinanurban-wildlandinterfaceareaandimprovethecapa- bility of controlling such fires. SECTION A102 VEGETATION CONTROL A102.1 General.Vegetation control shall comply with this section. A102.2Clearanceofbrushorvegetativegrowthfromroad- ways.Thecodeofficialisauthorizedtorequireareaswithin10 feet(3048mm)oneachsideofportionsoffireapparatusaccess roads and driveways to be cleared of nonfire-resistive vegeta- tion growth. Exception:Single specimens of trees, ornamental vegeta- tive fuels or cultivated ground cover, such as green grass, ivy,succulentsor similarplantsused asground cover,pro- videdtheydonotformameansofreadilytransmittingfire. A102.3 Clearance of brush and vegetative growth from electrical transmission and distribution lines. A102.3.1 General.Clearance of brush and vegetative growth from electrical transmission and distribution lines shall be in accordance with Section A102.3. Exception:Section A102.3 does not authorize persons nothavinglegalrightofentrytoenteronordamagethe property of others without consent of the owner. A102.3.2Supportclearance.Personsowning,controlling, operatingormaintainingelectricaltransmissionordistribu- tionlinesshallhaveanapprovedprograminplacethatiden- tifies poles or towers with equipment and hardware types thathaveahistoryofbecominganignitionsource,andpro- videsacombustiblefreespaceconsistingofaclearingofnot lessthan10feet(3048mm)ineachdirectionfromtheouter circumferenceofsuchpoleortowerduringsuchperiodsof time as designated by the code official. Exception:Lines used exclusively as telephone, tele- graph,messengercall,alarmtransmissionorotherlines classed as communication circuits by a public utility. A102.3.3 Electrical distribution and transmission line clearances. A102.3.3.1 General.Clearances between vegetation and electrical lines shall be in accordance with Section A102.3.3. A102.3.3.2 Trimming clearance.At the time of trim- ming,clearancesnotlessthanthoseestablishedbyTable A102.3.3.2 shall be provided. The radial clearances shown below are minimum clearances that shall be es- tablished, at time of trimming, between the vegetation and the energized conductors and associated live parts. TABLE A102.3.3.2 MINIMUM CLEARANCES BETWEEN VEGETATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES AT TIME OF TRIMMING LINE VOLTAGE MINIMUM RADIAL CLEARANCE FROM CONDUCTOR (feet) 2,400-72,000 4 72,001-110,000 6 110,001-300,000 10 300,001 or more 15 For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm. Exception:The code official is authorized to estab- lish minimum clearances different than those speci- fied by Table A102.3.3.2 when evidence substantiating such other clearances is submitted to and approved by the code official. A102.3.3.3 Minimum clearance to be maintained. Clearances not less than those established by Table A102.3.3.3 shall be maintained during such periods of timeasdesignatedbythecodeofficial.Thesite-specific clearanceachieved, attimeof pruning, shallvary based on species growth rates, the utility company-specific trim cycle, the potential line sway due to wind, line sag due to electrical loading and ambient temperature and thetree’slocationinproximitytothehighvoltagelines. Exception:The code official is authorized to estab- lish minimum clearances different than those speci- fied by Table A102.3.3.3 when evidence substantiating such other clearances is submitted to and approved by the code official. TABLE A102.3.3.3 MINIMUM CLEARANCES BETWEEN VEGETATION AND ELECTRICAL LINES TO BE MAINTAINED LINE VOLTAGE MINIMUM CLEARANCE (inches) 750-35,000 6 35,001-60,000 12 60,001-115,000 19 115,001-230,000 30.5 230,001-500,000 115 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm. A102.3.3.4Electricalpowerlineemergencies.During emergencies,theutilityshallperformtherequiredwork totheextentnecessarytoclearthehazard.Anemergency 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 21 APPENDIX A GENERAL REQUIREMENTS(optional) 107_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:23 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen can include situations such as trees falling into power lines, or trees in violation of Table A102.3.3.3. A102.4 Correction of condition.The code official is autho- rizedtogivenoticetotheownerofthepropertyonwhichcon- ditions regulated by Section A102 exist to correct such conditions. If the owner fails to correct such conditions, the legislative body of the jurisdiction is authorized to cause the sametobedoneandmaketheexpenseofsuchcorrectionalien on the property where such condition exists. SECTION A103 ACCESS RESTRICTIONS A103.1Restrictedentrytopubliclands.Thecodeofficialis authorized to determine and publicly announce when urban- wildlandinterfaceareasshallbeclosedtoentryandwhensuch areasshallagainbeopenedtoentry.Entryonandoccupationof urban-wildlandinterfaceareas,exceptpublicroadways,inhab- itedareasorestablishedtrailsandcampsitesthathavenotbeen closed during such time when the urban-wildland interface area is closed to entry, is prohibited. Exceptions: 1. Residents and owners of private property within ur- ban-wildland interface areas and their invitees and guests going to or being on their lands. 2. Entry, in the course of duty, by peace or police offi- cers,andotherdulyauthorizedpublicofficers,mem- bers of a fire department and members of the Wildland Firefighting Service. A103.2 Trespassing on posted private property. A103.2.1General.Whenthecodeofficialdeterminesthata specific area within an urban-wildland interface area pres- ents an exceptional and continuing fire danger because of thedensityofnaturalgrowth,difficultyofterrain,proximity to structures or accessibility to the public, such areas shall berestrictedorcloseduntilchangedconditionswarrantter- minationof such restrictionor closure. Such areasshallbe posted in accordance with Section A103.2.2. A103.2.2Signs.Approvedsignsprohibitingentrybyunau- thorizedpersonsandreferringtothiscodeshallbeplacedon every closed area. A103.2.3 Trespassing.Entering and remaining within ar- eas closed and posted is prohibited. Exception:Owners and occupiers of private or public property within closed and posted areas; their guests or invitees; authorized persons engaged in the operation andmaintenanceofnecessaryutilitiessuchaselectrical power, gas, telephone, water and sewer; and local, state and federal public officers and their authorized agents acting in the course of duty. A103.3Useoffireroadsanddefensiblespace.Motorcycles, motorscootersandmotorvehiclesshallnotbedrivenorparked on, and trespassing is prohibited on, fire roads or defensible space beyond the point where travel is restricted by a cable, gate or sign, without the permission of the property owners. Vehiclesshallnotbeparkedinamannerthatobstructstheen- trance to a fire road or defensible space. Exception:Publicofficersactingwithintheirscopeofduty. Radioandtelevisionaerials,guywiresthereto,andotherob- structions shall not be installed or maintained on fire roads or defensible spaces, unless located 16 feet (4877 mm) or more above such fire road or defensible space. A103.4 Use of motorcycles, motor scooters, ultralight air- craft and motor vehicles.Motorcycles, motor scooters, ultralight aircraft and motor vehicles shall not be operated withinurban-wildlandinterfaceareas,withoutapermitbythe code official, except on clearly established public or private roads. Permission from the property owner shallbe presented when requesting a permit. A103.5 Tampering with locks, barricades, signs and ad- dressmarkers.Locks,barricades,seals,cables,signsandad- dress markersinstalledwithinurban-wildland interfaceareas, by or under the control of the code official, shall not be tam- pered with, mutilated, destroyed or removed. Gates, doors, barriers and locks installed by or under the control of the code official shall not be unlocked. SECTION A104 IGNITION SOURCE CONTROL A104.1General.Ignitionsourcesshallbeinaccordancewith Section A104. A104.2 Objective.Regulations in this section are intended to provide the minimum requirements to prevent the occurrence of wildfires. A104.3Clearancefromignitionsources.Clearancebetween ignitionsourcesandgrass,brushorothercombustiblemateri- als shall be maintained a minimum of 30 feet (9144 mm). A104.4 Smoking.When required by the code official, signs shallbepostedstatingNOSMOKING.Nopersonshallsmoke within15feet(4572mm)ofcombustiblematerialsornonfire- resistive vegetation. Exception:Placesofhabitationorintheboundaries ofes- tablished smoking areas or campsites as designated by the code official. A104.5 Equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames.Equipment and devices generating heat, sparks or open flames capable of igniting nearby combustibles shall notbeusedinurban-wildlandinterfaceareaswithoutapermit from the code official. Exception:Use of approved equipment in habitated pre- misesordesignatedcampsitesthatareaminimumof30feet (9144mm)fromgrass-,grain-,brush-orforest-coveredar- eas. A104.6Fireworks.Fireworksshallnotbeusedorpossessedin urban-wildland interface areas. Exception:Fireworks allowed by the code official under permitinaccordancewiththe InternationalFireCode when notprohibitedbyapplicablelocalorstatelaws,ordinances and regulations. The code official is authorized to seize, take, remove or cause to be removed fireworks in violation of this section. APPENDIX A 22 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 207_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen A104.7 Outdoor fires. A104.7.1General.Nopersonshallbuild,igniteormaintain anyoutdoorfireofanykindforanypurposeinoronanyur- ban-wildland interface area, except by the authority of a written permit from the code official. Exception:Outdoor fires within inhabited premises or designatedcampsiteswheresuchfiresareinapermanent barbecue,portablebarbecue,outdoorfireplace,incinera- tororgrillandareaminimumof30feet(9144mm)from anycombustiblematerialornonfire-resistivevegetation. A104.7.2Permits.Permitsshallincorporatesuchtermsand conditionsthatwillreasonablysafeguardpublicsafetyand property. Outdoor fires shall not be built, ignited or main- tainedinoronhazardousfireareasunderthefollowingcon- ditions: 1. When high winds are blowing, 2. Whenaperson17yearsoldoroverisnotpresentatall times to watch and tend such fire, or 3. Whenapublicannouncementismadethatopenburn- ing is prohibited. A104.7.3 Restrictions.No person shall use a permanent barbecue, portable barbecue, outdoor fireplace or grill for thedisposalofrubbish,trashorcombustiblewastematerial. A104.8Incinerators,outdoorfireplaces,permanentbarbe- cues and grills.Incinerators, outdoor fireplaces, permanent barbecues and grillsshallnot be built,installedor maintained inurban-wildlandinterfaceareaswithoutapprovalofthecode official. Incinerators, outdoor fireplaces, permanent barbecues and grillsshallbemaintainedingoodrepairandinasafecondition atalltimes.Openingsinsuchappliancesshallbeprovidedwith an approved spark arrestor, screen or door. Exception:When approved by the code official, unpro- tectedopeningsinbarbecuesandgrillsnecessaryforproper functioning. A104.9 Reckless behavior.The code official is authorized to stopanyactionsofapersonorpersonsiftheofficialdetermines thattheactionisrecklessandcouldresultinanignitionoffire or spread of fire. A104.10 Planting vegetation under or adjacent to ener- gizedelectricallines.Novegetationshallbeplantedunderor adjacent to energized power lines that, at maturity, shall grow within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the energized conductors. SECTION A105 CONTROL OF STORAGE A105.1 General.In addition to therequirements of the Inter- nationalFireCode,storageanduseofthematerialsshallbein accordance with Section A105. A105.2Hazardousmaterials.Hazardousmaterialsinexcess of10gallons(37.8L)ofliquid,200cubicfeet(5.66m3)ofgas, or10pounds(4.54kg)ofsolidsrequireapermitandshallcom- ply with nationally recognized standards for storage and use. A105.3 Explosives.Explosives shall not be possessed, kept, stored, sold, offered for sale, given away, used, discharged, transportedordisposedofwithinurban-wildlandinterfacear- eas, except by permit from the code official. A105.4 Combustible materials. A105.4.1General.Outsidestorageofcombustiblemateri- als such as, but not limitedto, wood, rubber tires, building materialsorpaperproductsshallcomplywiththeotherap- plicable sections of this code and this section. A105.4.2Individualpiles.Individualpilesshallnotexceed 5,000 square feet (465 m2) of contiguous area. Piles shall notexceed50,000cubicfeet(1416m3)involumeor10feet (3048 mm) in height. A105.4.3 Separation.A clear space of at least 40 feet (12 192 mm) shall be provided between piles. The clear space shall not contain combustible material or nonfire-resistive vegetation. SECTION A106 DUMPING A106.1 Waste material.Waste material shall not be placed, deposited or dumped in urban-wildland interface areas, or in, on or along trails,roadwaysor highwaysor againststructures in urban-wildland interface areas. Exception:Approved public and approved private dump- ing areas. A106.2Ashesandcoals.Ashesandcoalsshallnotbeplaced, deposited or dumped in or on urban-wildland interface areas. Exceptions: 1. Inthehearthofanestablishedfirepit,campstoveor fireplace. 2. In a noncombustible container with a tightfitting lid, whichiskeptormaintainedinasafelocationnotless than10feet(3048mm)fromnonfire-resistivevegeta- tion or structures. 3. Where such ashes or coals are buried and covered with1foot(305mm)ofmineralearthnotlessthan25 feet (7620 mm) from nonfire-resistive vegetation or structures. SECTION A107 PROTECTION OF PUMPS AND WATER STORAGE FACILITIES A107.1General.Thereliabilityofthewatersupplyshallbein accordance with Section A107. A107.2 Objective.Theintentofthissectionistoincreasethe reliability of water storage and pumping facilities and to pro- tect such systems against loss from intrusion by fire. A107.3 Fuel modification area.Water storage and pumping facilitiesshall be provided with a defensible space of not less than30feet(9144mm)clearofnonfire-resistivevegetationor growth around and adjacent to such facilities. Persons owning, controlling, operating or maintaining wa- ter storage and pumping systems requiring this defensible APPENDIX A 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 23 307_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen spaceareresponsibleforclearingandremovingnonfire-resis- tive vegetation and maintaining the defensible space on the property owned, leased or controlled by said person. A107.4 Trees.Portions of trees that extend to within 30 feet (9144 mm) of combustible portions of water storage and pumping facilities shall be removed. A107.5 Protection of electricalpower supplies.When elec- trical pumps are used to provide the required water supply, suchpumpsshallbeconnectedtoastandbypowersourcetoau- tomatically maintain electrical power in the event of power loss. The standby power source shall be capable of providing powerforaminimumoftwohoursinaccordancewiththeICC Electrical Code. Exception:A standby power source is not required where theprimarypowerservicetopumpsareundergroundasap- proved by the code official. SECTION A108 LAND USE LIMITATIONS A108.1 General.Temporary fairs, carnivals, public exhibi- tionsandsimilarusesmustcomplywithallotherprovisionsof this code in addition to enhanced ingress and egress require- ments. A108.2 Objective.The increased public use of land or struc- tures in urban-wildland interface areas also increases the po- tential threat to life safety. The provisions of this section are intended to reduce that threat. A108.3 Permits.Temporary fairs, carnivals, public exhibi- tionsorsimilarusesshallnotbeallowedinadesignatedurban- wildland interface area, except by permit from the code offi- cial. Permitsshallincorporatesuchtermsandconditionsthatwill reasonably safeguard public safety and property. A108.4 Access roadways.In addition to the requirements in Section 403, access roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (7315mm)wideandpostedNOPARKING.Twoaccessroad- ways shall be provided to serve the permitted use area. When required by the code official to facilitate emergency operations, approved emergency vehicleoperating areas shall be provided. APPENDIX A 24 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACECODE 407_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.ps M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\07_AppA_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:29:24 PM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen APPENDIX B VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Vegetation management plans shall be submitted to the code officialforreviewandapprovalaspartoftheplansrequiredfor a permit. Vegetation management plans shall describe all ac- tionsthatwillbetakentopreventafirefrom beingcarriedto- ward or away from the building. A vegetation management plan shall include at least the following information: 1. A copy of the site plan. 2. Methodsandtimetablesfor controlling,changingormod- ifyingareasontheproperty.Elementsoftheplanshallin- clude removal of slash, snags, vegetation that may grow into overhead electrical lines, other ground fuels, ladder fuelsanddeadtrees,andthethinningoflivetrees. 3. Aplanformaintainingtheproposedfuel-reductionmea- sures. To be considered a fuel modification for purposes of this code, continuous maintenance of the clearance is required. 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 25 Grasses Agropyron cristatum (Crested Wheatgrass) Agropyron smithii (Western Wheatgrass) Buchloe dactyloides (Buffalograss) Dactylis glomerata (Orchardgrass) Festuca cinerea and other species (Blue Fescue) Lolium species (Rye Grass) Poa pratensis (Kentucky Bluegrass) Poa secunda (Sandberg Bluegrass) HerbaceousPerennials Achillea clavennae (Silvery Yarrow) Achillea filipendulina (Fernleaf Yarrow) Achillea - other species & hybrids (Yarrow)* Aquilegia - species & hybrids (Columbine) Armeria maritime (Sea Pink, Sea Thrift) Artemisia stelleriana (Beach Wormwood, Dusty Miller) Artemisia - other species & hybrids (Various names)* Bergenia – species & hybrids (Bergenia) Centranthus rubber (Red Valerian, Jupiter’s Beard) Cerastium tomentosum (Snow-in-summer) Coreopsis auriculata var.Nana (Dwarf Mouse Ear Coreopsis) Coreopsis – other perennial species (Coreopsis) Delosperma nubigenum (Hardy Ice Plant) Dianthus plumarius & others (Pinks) Erigeron hybrids (Fleabane)* Gaillardia X grandiflora (Blanket Flower) Geranium cinereum (Hardy Geranium) Geranium sanguineum (Bloody Cranesbill, Bloodred Geranium) Geranium species (Geranium) Hemerocallis species (Daylily) Heuchera sanguinea (Coral Bells, Alum Root) Iberis sempervirens (Evergreen Candytuft) Iris species & hybrids (Iris) Kniphofia species & hybrids (Red-hot Poker) Lavandula species (Lavender) Leucanthemum X superbum (Shasta Daisy) Limonium latifolium (Sea-lavender, Statice) Linum species (Flax) Liriope spicata (Lily-turf) Lupinus species & hybrids (Lupine)* Medicago sativus (Alfalfa) Oenothera species (Primrose) Papaver species (Poppy) Penstemon species & hybrids (Penstemon) Perovskia atriplicifolia (Russian Sage, Azure Sage) Potentilla nepalensis (Nepal Cinquefoil) Potentilla tridentata (Wineleaf Cinquefoil) Potentilla verna (tabernaemontani)(Spring Cinquefoil; Creeping Potentilla) Potentilla – other non-shrubby species & hybrids (Cinquefoil, Potentilla)* Salvia species & hybrids (Salvia, Sage)* Sedum species (Stonecrop, Sedum) Sempervivum tectorum (Hen and Chicks) Stachys byzantina (Lamb’s Ear) Yucca filamentosa (Yucca) UTAHFIRE RESISTIVE SPECIES Adapted from “UtahForestFacts: FirewisePlants forUtahLandscapes” Utah State University Extension, 2002 continued 108_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_25.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\08_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:57:00 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen APPENDIX B 26 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE Shrubs and Woody Vines Atriplex species (Saltbush) Ceanothus americanus (New Jersey Tea) Ceanothus ovatus & others (Ceanothus) Cistus species (Rock-rose) Cotoneaster dammeri (Bearberry Cotoneaster) Cotoneaster horizontalis (Rockspray or Rock Cotoneaster) Cotoneaster – other compact species (Cotoneaster) Hedera helix (English Ivy) Lonicera species & hybrids (Honeysuckle) Mahonia repens (Creeping Oregon Grape) Parthenocissus quinquefolia (Virginia Creeper) Prunus besseyi (Sand Cherry) Purshia tridentata (Bitterbrush, Antelope Bitterbrush) Pyracantha species (Firethorn, Pyracantha) Rhamnus species (Buckthorn) Rhus trilobata (Skunkbush Sumac) Rhus – other species (Sumac) Ribes species (Currant, Gooseberry) Rosa rugosa & other hedge roses (Rugosa Rose) Shepherdia canadensis (Russet Buffaloberry) Syringa vulgare (Lilac) Vinca major (Large Periwinkle) Vinca minor (Dwarf Periwinkle, Common Periwinkle) Trees Acer species (Maple) Betula species (Birch) Cercis canadensis (Eastern Redbud) Populus tremuloides (Quaking Aspen) Populus – other species (Poplar, Cottonwood) Salix species (Willow) *Plantsorgroupsofplantsmarkedwithanasterisk(*)canbecomeweedyincertaincircumstances,andmayevenbenoxiousweedswithlegal restrictionsagainsttheirplantingandcultivation. CheckwithyourlocalExtensionofficeorStateDepartmentofAgricultureforinformation on noxious weeds in your area. Note:Some of the listed plants may not be considered “water-wise” or drought-tolerant for arid climates. 208_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_26.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\08_AppB_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:53:03 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen A. Subdivision Design Points 1. Ingress/Egress Twoormoreprimaryroads 1___ One road 10___ One-laneroadin,one-laneroadout 15___ 2. Width of Primary Road 20 feet or more 1___ Less than 20 feet 5___ 3. Accessibility Roadgrade5%orless 1___ Road grade 5-10%5___ Roadgradegreaterthan10%10___ 4. Secondary Road Terminus Loop roads, cul-de-sacs with an outside turning radiusof45feetorgreater 1___ Cul-de-sac turnaround 5___ Dead-endroads200feetorlessinlength 8___ Dead-endroadsgreaterthan200feetinlength 10___ 5. Street Signs Present but unapproved 3___ Not present 5___ B. Vegetation (IUWIC Definitions) 1. Fuel Types Surface Lawn/noncombustible 1___ Grass/shortbrush 5___ Scattereddead/downwoodymaterial 10___ Abundantdead/downwoodymaterial 15___ Overstory Deciduoustrees(excepttallbrush)3___ Mixeddeciduoustreesandtallbrush 10___ Clumped/scatteredconifersand/ortallbrush 15___ Contiguousconiferand/ortallbrush 20___ 2. Defensible Space 70%ormoreoflotscompleted 1___ 30%to70%oflotscompleted 10___ Lessthan30%oflotscompleted 20___ C. Topography Locatedonflat,baseofhill,orsetbackatcrestofhill 1___ Onslopewith0-20%grade 5___ Onslopewith21-30%grade 10___ Onslopewith31%gradeorgreater 15___ Atcrestofhillwithunmitigatedvegetationbelow 20___ D. Roofing Material ClassAFireRated 1___ ClassBFireRated 5___ ClassCFireRated 10___ Nonrated 20___ E. Fire Protection—Water Source 500GPMhydrantwithin1,000feet 1___ Hydrantfartherthan1,000feetordraftsite 5___ Watersource20min.orless,roundtrip 10___ Water source farther than 20 min., and 45min.orless,roundtrip 15___ Watersourcefartherthan45min.,roundtrip 20___ F. Siding and Decking Noncombustible siding/deck 1___ Combustiblesiding/nodeck 5___ Noncombustible siding/combustible deck 10___ Combustiblesidinganddeck 15___ G . Utilities (gas and/or electric) All underground utilities 1___ Oneunderground,oneaboveground 3___ All aboveground 5___ Total for Subdivision Moderate Hazard 50–75 High Hazard 76–100 Extreme Hazard 101+ 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 27 APPENDIX C FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM This appendix is to be used to determine the fire hazard severity. 109_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_27.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\09_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:49:26 AM Color profile: DisabledComposite Default screen 28 2006 UTAH WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE 209_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg28.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\09_AppC_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:57:15 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen INDEX A ACCESS Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402 Driveways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.2 Fire apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.2 Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.7 Individual structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.2 Marking of roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.4 Restricted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .403.1 Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.1 ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.4 ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS OR METHODS. . . .103.3 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS . . . . . .602 C CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108 CLASS 1 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504 Detached accessory structures . . . . . . . . .504.11 Exterior doors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.9 Exterior walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.5 Protection of eaves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.3 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.2 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.10 Windows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .504.8 CLASS 2 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505 Detached accessory structures . . . . . . . . .505.11 Exterior doors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.9 Exterior walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.5 Protection of eaves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.3 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.2 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.10 Windows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .505.8 CLASS 3 IGNITION-RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506 Roof covering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506.2 Unenclosed underfloor protection . . . . . . . .506.3 Vents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .506.4 CONTROL OF STORAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A105 D DEFENSIBLE SPACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .603 Fuel modification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .603.2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .202 DUMPING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A106 F FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .502 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY FORM . . . . . . .Appendix C G GENERAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A I IGNITION SOURCE CONTROL . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A104 INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Authority to inspect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.1.2 Citations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.4.4 Enforcements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.2 Reinspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.1.3 Right of entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.3 Unsafe conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .107.4.5 L LAND USE LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A108 LIABILITY OF THE CODE OFFICIAL . . . . . . . . .102.3 LPG INSTALLATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .606 M MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.6 MAINTENANCE OF DEFENSIBLE SPACE . . . . . .604 Modified area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.2 Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.3 Trees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .604.4 P PERMITS Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.4 Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.5 Expiration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.8 Issuance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.6 Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.2 Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.9 Revocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.10 Validity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.7 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 29 110_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_29.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\10_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:53:12 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Work exempt from permit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .105.3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .106 Information on plans and specifications. . . .106.2 Vegetation management plans. . . . . . . . . . .106.4 POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE CODE OFFICIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .102.1 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103.1 PROTECTION OF PUMPS AND WATER STORAGE FACILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A107 R REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR OF ROOF COVERINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .507 RETROACTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101.4 S SPARK ARRESTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .605 STORAGE OF FIREWOOD AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .607 T TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .103.2 U URBAN-WILDLAND INTERFACE AREA DESIGNATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301 Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.1 Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.2 Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .301.3 V VEGETATION CONTROL . . . . . . . . . . . . .Appendix A, Section A102 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN . . . .Appendix B W WATER SUPPLY Adequate water supply. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.5 Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402 Draft sites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.3 Hydrants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.4 Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.8 Individual structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.2 Obstructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.7 Reliability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.10 Subdivisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .402.1 Testing and maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.9 Water sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404.2 INDEX 30 2006 UTAHWILDLAND-URBANINTERFACE CODE 210_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006_pg_30.prn M:\data\CODES\STATE CODES\Utah\2006\Wildland-Urban\Final VP\10_Utah_WildlandUrban_2006.vp Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:52:41 AM Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profileComposite Default screen Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 1 Wildland Urban Interface Modifications 2025 GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor: Casey Snider Senate Sponsor: Michael K. McKell 2 3 LONG TITLE 4 General Description: 5 This bill addresses efforts to oversee wildfire risks associated with wildland urban interface 6 property. 7 Highlighted Provisions: 8 This bill: 9 ▸ defines terms; 10 ▸ requires counties to take certain actions related to wildland urban interface property, 11 including assessing a fee; 12 ▸ directs the fee to be retained by a county and deposited into the Wildland-urban Interface 13 Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund; 14 ▸ addresses insuring wildland urban interface property; 15 ▸ imposes notice requirements related to insuring wildland urban interface property; 16 ▸ requires counties and municipalities to adopt the wildland urban interface building code 17 standards; 18 ▸ permits the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands (division) to choose not to cover 19 costs of local governments under certain circumstances; 20 ▸ directs the division to establish a program for wildland urban interface coordinators to 21 evaluate, using a triage scale, high risk wildland urban interface property; 22 ▸ addresses actions related to evaluating the high risk wildland urban interface property; 23 ▸ provides for a database to be accessed by certain insurers related to evaluating high risk 24 wildland urban interface property; 25 ▸ authorizes rulemaking; 26 ▸ addresses liability; and 27 ▸ makes technical changes. H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 28 Money Appropriated in this Bill: 29 None 30 Other Special Clauses: 31 This bill provides a special effective date. 32 Utah Code Sections Affected: 33 AMENDS: 34 15A-5-203, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapters 21, 381 35 63G-7-201, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapters 34, 105, 259, 329, 452, and 36 456 37 65A-8-203, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 77 38 65A-8-215, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 77 39 ENACTS: 40 17-16-22, Utah Code Annotated 1953 41 31A-22-1310, Utah Code Annotated 1953 42 65A-8-401, Utah Code Annotated 1953 43 65A-8-402, Utah Code Annotated 1953 44 65A-8-403, Utah Code Annotated 1953 45 46 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah: 47 Section 1. Section 15A-5-203 is amended to read: 48 15A-5-203 . Amendments and additions to IFC related to fire safety, building, 49 and site requirements. 50 (1) For IFC, Chapter 5, Fire Service Features: 51 (a) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 501.5, Access grade and fire flow, is added as 52 follows: "An authority having jurisdiction over a structure built in accordance with 53 the requirements of the International Residential Code as adopted in the State 54 Construction Code, may require an automatic fire sprinkler system for the structure 55 only by ordinance and only if any of the following conditions exist: 56 (i) the structure: 57 (A) is located in an urban-wildland interface area as provided in the Utah 58 Wildland Urban Interface Code adopted as a construction code under the State 59 Construction Code; and 60 (B) does not meet the requirements described in Utah Code, Subsection 65A-8-203 61 (4)[(a)] (f) and Utah Administrative Code, R652-122-1300, Minimum - 2 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 62 Standards for County Wildland Fire Ordinance; 63 (ii) the structure is in an area where a public water distribution system with fire 64 hydrants does not exist as required in Utah Administrative Code, R309-550-5, 65 Water Main Design; 66 (iii) the only fire apparatus access road has a grade greater than 10% for more than 67 500 continual feet; 68 (iv) the total floor area of all floor levels within the exterior walls of the dwelling unit 69 exceeds 10,000 square feet; or 70 (v) the total floor area of all floor levels within the exterior walls of the dwelling unit 71 is double the average of the total floor area of all floor levels of unsprinkled 72 homes in the subdivision that are no larger than 10,000 square feet. 73 (vi) Exception: A single family dwelling does not require a fire sprinkler system if 74 the dwelling: 75 (A) is located outside the wildland urban interface; 76 (B) is built in a one-lot subdivision; and 77 (C) has 50 feet of defensible space on all sides that limits the propensity of fire 78 spreading from the dwelling to another property." 79 (b) In IFC, Chapter 5, Section 506.1, Where Required, is deleted and rewritten as 80 follows: "Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of 81 secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or 82 fire-fighting purposes, the fire code official, after consultation with the building 83 owner, may require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box 84 shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the fire code official. For 85 each fire jurisdiction that has at least one building with a required key box, the fire 86 jurisdiction shall adopt an ordinance, resolution, or other operating rule or policy that 87 creates a process to ensure that each key to each key box is properly accounted for 88 and secure." 89 (c) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 507.1.1, Isolated one- and two-family dwellings, is 90 added as follows: "Fire flow may be reduced for an isolated one- and two-family 91 dwelling when the authority having jurisdiction over the dwelling determines that the 92 development of a full fire-flow requirement is impractical." 93 (d) In IFC, Chapter 5, a new Section 507.1.2, Pre-existing subdivision lots, is added as follows: 94 "507.1.2 Pre-existing subdivision lots. 95 The requirements for a pre-existing subdivision lot shall not exceed the requirements - 3 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 96 described in Section 501.5." 97 (e) In IFC, Chapter 5, Section 507.5.1, here required, a new exception is added: "3. One 98 interior and one detached accessory dwelling unit on a single residential lot." 99 (f) IFC, Chapter 5, Section 510.1, Emergency responder communication coverage in 100 new buildings, is amended by adding: "When required by the fire code official, 101 unless the new building is a public school as that term is defined in Section 102 53G-9-205.1 or a private school, then the fire code official shall require," at the 103 beginning of the first paragraph. 104 (2) For IFC, Chapter 6, Building Services and Systems: 105 (a) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 604.6.1, Elevator key location, is deleted and rewritten as 106 follows: "Firefighter service keys shall be kept in a "Supra-Stor-a-key" elevator key 107 box or similar box with corresponding key system that is adjacent to the elevator for 108 immediate use by the fire department. The key box shall contain one key for each 109 elevator, one key for lobby control, and any other keys necessary for emergency 110 service. The elevator key box shall be accessed using a 6049 numbered key." 111 (b) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 606.1, General, is amended as follows: On line three, after 112 the word "Code", add the words "and NFPA 96". 113 (c) IFC, Chapter 6, Section 607.2, a new exception 5 is added as follows: "5. A Type 1 114 hood is not required for a cooking appliance in a microenterprise home kitchen, as 115 that term is defined in Utah Code, Section 26B-7-401, for which the operator obtains 116 a permit in accordance with Section 26B-7-416." 117 (3) IFC, Chapter 7, Fire and Smoke Protection Features, Section 702.5, is deleted. 118 Section 2. Section 17-16-22 is enacted to read: 119 17-16-22 . Wildland urban interface evaluation and fees. 120 (1) As used in this section: 121 (a) "County officer" means the same as that term is defined in Section 17-16-21. 122 (b) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means the same as that term is defined 123 in Section 65A-8-401. 124 (c) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 125 65A-8-401. 126 (d) "Wildland urban interface coordinator" means the same as that term is defined in 127 Section 65A-8-401. 128 (2) If evaluation of high risk wildland urban interface property is assigned to a county under 129 Section 65A-8-402: - 4 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 130 (a) the county shall enter into a cooperative agreement with the Division of Forestry, 131 Fire, and State Lands, in accordance with Subsection 65A-8-203(2)(a), which 132 agreement shall address compliance with this Subsection (2) for evaluation and 133 classification of high risk wildland urban interface property; and 134 (b) a county officer shall require that a wildland urban interface coordinator representing 135 the county annually evaluate high risk wildland urban interface property within the 136 county in accordance with Section 65A-8-402. 137 (3) Beginning January 1, 2026, a county officer shall: 138 (a) annually assess a fee: 139 (i) against the property owner of high risk wildland urban interface property within 140 the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the county; and 141 (ii) in the amount set by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands under Section 142 65A-8-402; and 143 (b)(i) after retaining a portion of the fee under Subsection (3)(b)(ii), transmit the fee 144 assessed under Subsection (3)(a) to the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands 145 for deposit into the Wildland-urban Interface Prevention, Preparedness, and 146 Mitigation Fund created in Section 65A-8-215; and 147 (ii) retain that portion of the fee assessed under Subsection (3)(a) necessary to pay 148 costs incurred by the county in implementing this section, which the county may 149 include in the county's annual accounting of wildfire prevention, preparedness, 150 mitigation actions, and associated costs for purposes of Subsection 151 65A-8-203(4)(c). 152 (4) A county may hold a political subdivision lien on high risk wildland urban interface 153 property for a fee that is past due by following the procedures in Sections 17B-1-902 154 and 17B-1-902.1, as if the county is a special district. 155 Section 3. Section 31A-22-1310 is enacted to read: 156 31A-22-1310 . Insuring wildland urban interface property. 157 (1) As used in this section: 158 (a) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means the same as that term is defined 159 in Section 65A-8-401. 160 (b) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 161 65A-8-401. 162 (c) "Wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer" means an insurer that issues 163 property or casualty insurance for wildland urban interface property. - 5 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 164 (2)(a) For purposes of determining whether property is high risk wildland urban 165 interface property, a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer may only 166 use the boundary provided in the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool maintained 167 by the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands in accordance with Subsection 168 65A-8-203(8) to determine whether the property is high risk wildland urban interface 169 property. 170 (b) A wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer may use additional fire 171 hazard data, beyond the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool described in 172 Subsection (2)(a), in connection with setting a rate for, or the underwriting of, high 173 risk wildland urban interface property if the wildland urban interface property and 174 casualty insurer's use of additional fire hazard data is in compliance with: 175 (i) the boundary determination made in Subsection (2)(a); and 176 (ii) this title and department rules made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, 177 Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act. 178 (c) If a property is determined not to be high risk wildland urban interface in accordance 179 with Subsection (2)(a), this Subsection (2) does not apply to the use of fire hazard 180 data in connection with rate setting or underwriting of the property. 181 (d) This Subsection (2) does not restrict the use of data or underwriting tools in 182 determining risks that are unrelated to fire risk. 183 (3)(a) If an owner of property located within the wildland urban interface files a 184 complaint with the department asserting that a wildland urban interface property and 185 casualty insurer has violated, or is violating, this section, the department may 186 investigate the wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to determine 187 whether a violation has occurred or is occurring. 188 (b) If after an investigation under this Subsection (3) the department finds that a 189 wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer has violated or is violating this 190 section, the department may: 191 (i) issue prohibitory, mandatory, and other orders as necessary to secure compliance 192 with this section; and 193 (ii) impose penalties against the wildland urban interface property and casualty 194 insurer in accordance with Section 31A-2-308. 195 (4) In addition to complying with relevant requirements of Section 31A-21-303, if due to 196 risks of wildfire a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer: 197 (a) cancels or nonrenews property and casualty insurance covering wildland urban - 6 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 198 interface property, the wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer shall 199 include in the notice of cancellation or nonrenewal the facts on which the wildland 200 urban interface property and casualty insurer's decision is based with reasonable 201 precision; and 202 (b) increases the premium by more than 20% of the previous term's premium for 203 property and casualty insurance covering wildland urban interface property, after 204 receipt of a request for the information by the insured the wildland urban interface 205 property and casualty insurer shall provide the insured the facts on which the 206 wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer's decision is based with 207 reasonable precision. 208 (5) Subsections (1) through (4) apply on and after January 1, 2026. 209 (6) This section does not: 210 (a) create a cause of action for an act or failure to act under this section against: 211 (i) the state; 212 (ii) the department; 213 (iii) the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 214 (iv) an officer, consultant, or employee of the department or Division of Forestry, 215 Fire, and State Lands; 216 (v) a wildland urban interface coordinator, as defined in Section 65A-8-401; or 217 (vi) a county; 218 (b) waive governmental immunity in accordance with Subsection 63G-7-201(5); or 219 (c) create a cause of action against a wildland urban interface property and casualty 220 insurer for use in accordance with Subsection (2)(a) of the boundary provided in the 221 wildfire risk assessment mapping tool maintained by the Division of Forestry, Fire, 222 and State Lands in accordance with Subsection 65A-8-203(8). 223 Section 4. Section 63G-7-201 is amended to read: 224 63G-7-201 . Immunity of governmental entities and employees from suit. 225 (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each 226 employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from 227 the exercise of a governmental function. 228 (2) Notwithstanding the waiver of immunity provisions of Section 63G-7-301, a 229 governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit: 230 (a) as provided in Section 78B-4-517; and 231 (b) for any injury or damage resulting from the implementation of or the failure to - 7 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 232 implement measures to: 233 (i) control the causes of epidemic and communicable diseases and other conditions 234 significantly affecting the public health or necessary to protect the public health as 235 set out in Title 26A, Chapter 1, Local Health Departments; 236 (ii) investigate and control suspected bioterrorism and disease as set out in Sections 237 26B-7-316 through 26B-7-324; 238 (iii) respond to a national, state, or local emergency, a public health emergency as 239 defined in Section 26B-7-301, or a declaration by the President of the United 240 States or other federal official requesting public health related activities, including 241 the use, provision, operation, and management of: 242 (A) an emergency shelter; 243 (B) housing; 244 (C) a staging place; or 245 (D) a medical facility; and 246 (iv) adopt methods or measures, in accordance with Section 26B-1-202, for health 247 care providers, public health entities, and health care insurers to coordinate among 248 themselves to verify the identity of the individuals they serve. 249 (3)(a) A governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit, and 250 immunity is not waived, for any injury if the injury arises out of or in connection 251 with, or results from: 252 (i) a latent dangerous or latent defective condition of: 253 (A) any highway, road, street, alley, crosswalk, sidewalk, culvert, tunnel, bridge, 254 or viaduct; or 255 (B) another structure located on any of the items listed in this Subsection (3)(a)(i); 256 or 257 (ii) a latent dangerous or latent defective condition of any public building, structure, 258 dam, reservoir, or other public improvement. 259 (b)(i) As used in this Subsection (3)(b): 260 (A) "Contaminated land" means the same as that term is defined in Section 261 11-58-102. 262 (B) "Contamination" means the condition of land that results from the placement, 263 disposal, or release of hazardous matter on, in, or under the land, including any 264 seeping or escaping of the hazardous matter from the land. 265 (C) "Damage" means any property damage, personal injury, or other injury or any - 8 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 266 loss of any kind, however denominated. 267 (D) "Environmentally compliant" means, as applicable, obtaining a certificate of 268 completion from the Department of Environmental Quality under Section 269 19-8-111 following participation in a voluntary cleanup under Title 19, Chapter 270 8, Voluntary Cleanup Program, obtaining an administrative letter from the 271 Department of Environmental Quality for a discrete phase of a voluntary 272 cleanup that is conducted under a remedial action plan as defined in Section 273 11-58-605, or complying with the terms of an environmental covenant, as 274 defined in Section 57-25-102, signed by an agency, as defined in Section 275 57-25-102, and duly recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in 276 which the contaminated land is located. 277 (E) "Government owner" means a governmental entity, including an independent 278 entity, as defined in Section 63E-1-102, that acquires an ownership interest in 279 land that was contaminated land before the governmental entity or independent 280 entity acquired an ownership interest in the land. 281 (F) "Hazardous matter" means hazardous materials, as defined in Section 19-6-302, 282 hazardous substances, as defined in Section 19-6-302, or landfill material, as 283 defined in Section 11-58-102. 284 (G) "Remediation" means the same as that term is defined in Section 11-58-102. 285 (ii)(A) A government owner and the government owner's officers and employees 286 are immune from suit, and immunity is not waived, for any claim for damage 287 that arises out of or in connection with, or results from, contamination of 288 contaminated land. 289 (B) A government owner's ownership of contaminated land may not be the basis 290 of a claim against the government owner for damage that arises out of or in 291 connection with, or results from, contamination of contaminated land. 292 (iii) Subsection (3)(b)(ii) does not limit or affect: 293 (A) the liability of a person that placed, disposed of, or released hazardous matter 294 on, in, or under the land; or 295 (B) a worker compensation claim of an employee of an entity that conducts work 296 on or related to contaminated land. 297 (iv) Immunity under Subsection (3)(b)(ii)(A) is not affected by a government owner's 298 remediation of contaminated land if the government owner is environmentally 299 compliant. - 9 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 300 (4) A governmental entity, its officers, and its employees are immune from suit, and 301 immunity is not waived, for any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or 302 omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment, if the injury arises 303 out of or in connection with, or results from: 304 (a) the exercise or performance, or the failure to exercise or perform, a discretionary 305 function, whether or not the discretion is abused; 306 (b) except as provided in Subsections 63G-7-301(2)(j), (3), and (4), assault, battery, 307 false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, intentional trespass, abuse of 308 process, libel, slander, deceit, interference with contract rights, infliction of mental 309 anguish, or violation of civil rights; 310 (c) the issuance, denial, suspension, or revocation of, or the failure or refusal to issue, 311 deny, suspend, or revoke, any permit, license, certificate, approval, order, or similar 312 authorization; 313 (d) a failure to make an inspection or making an inadequate or negligent inspection; 314 (e) the institution or prosecution of any judicial or administrative proceeding, even if 315 malicious or without probable cause; 316 (f) a misrepresentation by an employee whether or not the misrepresentation is negligent 317 or intentional; 318 (g) a riot, unlawful assembly, public demonstration, mob violence, or civil disturbance; 319 (h) the collection or assessment of taxes; 320 (i) an activity of the Utah National Guard; 321 (j) the incarceration of a person in a state prison, county or city jail, or other place of 322 legal confinement; 323 (k) a natural condition on publicly owned or controlled land; 324 (l) a condition existing in connection with an abandoned mine or mining operation; 325 (m) an activity authorized by the School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration or 326 the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 327 (n) the operation or existence of a trail that is along a water facility, as defined in Section 328 73-1-8, stream, or river, regardless of ownership or operation of the water facility, 329 stream, or river, if: 330 (i) the trail is designated under a general plan adopted by a municipality under 331 Section 10-9a-401 or by a county under Section 17-27a-401; 332 (ii) the trail right-of-way or the right-of-way where the trail is located is open to 333 public use as evidenced by a written agreement between: - 10 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 334 (A) the owner or operator of the trail right-of-way or of the right-of-way where the 335 trail is located; and 336 (B) the municipality or county where the trail is located; and 337 (iii) the written agreement: 338 (A) contains a plan for operation and maintenance of the trail; and 339 (B) provides that an owner or operator of the trail right-of-way or of the 340 right-of-way where the trail is located has, at a minimum, the same level of 341 immunity from suit as the governmental entity in connection with or resulting 342 from the use of the trail; 343 (o) research or implementation of cloud management or seeding for the clearing of fog; 344 (p) the management of flood waters, earthquakes, or natural disasters; 345 (q) the construction, repair, or operation of flood or storm systems; 346 (r) the operation of an emergency vehicle, while being driven in accordance with the 347 requirements of Section 41-6a-212; 348 (s) the activity of: 349 (i) providing emergency medical assistance; 350 (ii) fighting fire; 351 (iii) regulating, mitigating, or handling hazardous materials or hazardous wastes; 352 (iv) an emergency evacuation; 353 (v) transporting or removing an injured person to a place where emergency medical 354 assistance can be rendered or where the person can be transported by a licensed 355 ambulance service; or 356 (vi) intervening during a dam emergency; 357 (t) the exercise or performance, or the failure to exercise or perform, any function 358 pursuant to Title 73, Chapter 10, Board of Water Resources - Division of Water 359 Resources; 360 (u) an unauthorized access to government records, data, or electronic information 361 systems by any person or entity; 362 (v) an activity of wildlife, as defined in Section 23A-1-101, that arises during the use of 363 a public or private road; 364 (w) a communication between employees of one or more law enforcement agencies 365 related to the employment, disciplinary history, character, professional competence, 366 or physical or mental health of a peace officer, or a former, current, or prospective 367 employee of a law enforcement agency, including any communication made in - 11 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 368 accordance with Section 53-14-103; or 369 (x) providing or failing to provide information under Section 53-27-102 or Subsection 370 41-1a-213(6), (7), or (8), 53-3-207(4), or 53-3-805(5). 371 (5) The following are immune from suit, and immunity is not waived for an action or 372 failure to act within the scope of duties or employment, if the injury arises out of, in 373 connection with, or results from the implementation of Section 17-16-22 to the extent it 374 addresses evaluating and classifying high risk wildland urban interface property, Section 375 31A-22-1310, or Title 65A, Chapter 8, Part 4, Wildland Urban Interface Property: 376 (a) the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 377 (b) an officer, employee, or consultant of the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands; 378 (c) a county; 379 (d) a wildland urban interface coordinator, as defined in Section 65A-8-401; 380 (e) the Insurance Department; or 381 (f) an officer, employee, or consultant of the Insurance Department. 382 Section 5. Section 65A-8-203 is amended to read: 383 65A-8-203 . Cooperative fire protection agreements with eligible entities. 384 (1) As used in this section: 385 (a) "Eligible entity" means: 386 (i) a county, a municipality, or a special service district, special district, or service 387 area with: 388 (A) wildland fire suppression responsibility as described in Section 11-7-1; and 389 (B) wildland fire suppression cost responsibility and taxing authority for a specific 390 geographic jurisdiction; or 391 (ii) upon approval by the director, a political subdivision established by a county, 392 municipality, special service district, special district, or service area that is 393 responsible for: 394 (A) providing wildland fire suppression services; and 395 (B) paying for the cost of wildland fire suppression services. 396 (b) "Fire service provider" means a public or private entity that fulfills the duties of 397 Subsection 11-7-1(1). 398 (2)(a) The governing body of any eligible entity may enter into a cooperative agreement 399 with the division to receive financial and wildfire management cooperation and 400 assistance from the division, as described in this part. 401 (b) A cooperative agreement shall last for a term of no more than five years and be - 12 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 402 renewable if the eligible entity continues to meet the requirements of this chapter. 403 (3)(a) The state shall assume an eligible entity's cost of suppressing catastrophic wildfire 404 as defined in the cooperative agreement if the eligible entity has entered into, and is 405 in full compliance with, a cooperative agreement with the division, as described in 406 this section. 407 (b) A county or municipality that is not covered by a cooperative agreement with the 408 division, as described in this section, shall be responsible for wildland fire costs 409 within the county or municipality's jurisdiction, as described in Section 65A-8-203.2. 410 (4) To enter into a cooperative agreement with the division, the eligible entity shall: 411 [(a) if the eligible entity is a county, adopt and enforce on unincorporated land a 412 wildland fire ordinance based upon minimum standards established by the division or 413 Uniform Building Code Commission;] 414 [(b)] (a) require that the fire department or equivalent fire service provider under contract 415 with, or delegated by, the eligible entity on unincorporated land meet minimum 416 standards for wildland fire training, certification, and suppression equipment based 417 upon nationally accepted standards as specified by the division; 418 [(c)] (b) invest in prevention, preparedness, and mitigation efforts, as agreed to with the 419 division, that will reduce the eligible entity's risk of catastrophic wildfire; 420 [(d)] (c)(i) file with the division an annual accounting of wildfire prevention, 421 preparedness, mitigation actions, and associated costs; 422 (ii) meet the eligibility entity's participation commitment by making direct payments 423 to the division; or 424 (iii) do a combination of Subsections [(4)(d)(i) and (ii)] (4)(c)(i) and (ii); 425 [(e)] (d) return the financial statement described in Subsection (6), signed by the chief 426 executive of the eligible entity, to the division on or before the date set by the 427 division;[ and] 428 [(f)] (e) if the eligible entity is a county, have a designated fire warden as described in 429 Section 65A-8-209.1[.] ; 430 (f) subject to Subsection (9), adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building 431 standards, as defined in Section 65A-8-401, if the eligible entity is a: 432 (i) county for purposes of an unincorporated area within the county; or 433 (ii) municipality for an incorporated area within a county; and 434 (g) if the eligible entity is a county, comply with Section 17-16-22. 435 (5)(a) The state forester may execute a cooperative agreement with the eligible entity. - 13 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 436 (b) The division shall make rules, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 437 Administrative Rulemaking Act, governing the: 438 (i) cooperative agreements described in this section; 439 (ii) manner in which an eligible entity shall provide proof of compliance with 440 Subsection (4); 441 (iii) manner by which the division may revoke a cooperative agreement if an eligible 442 entity ceases to meet the requirements described in this section; 443 (iv) accounting system for determining suppression costs; 444 (v) manner in which the division shall determine the eligible entity's participation 445 commitment; and 446 (vi) manner in which an eligible entity may appeal a division determination. 447 (6)(a) The division shall send a financial statement to each eligible entity participating in 448 a cooperative agreement that details the eligible entity's participation commitment for 449 the coming fiscal year, including the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation actions 450 agreed to under Subsection (4)[(c)] (b). 451 (b) Each eligible entity participating in a cooperative agreement shall: 452 (i) have the chief executive of the eligible entity sign the financial statement, or the 453 legislative body of the eligible entity approve the financial statement by 454 resolution, confirming the eligible entity's participation for the upcoming year; and 455 (ii) return the financial statement to the division, on or before a date set by the 456 division. 457 (c) A financial statement shall be effective for one calendar year, beginning on the date 458 set by the division, as described in Subsection (6)(b). 459 (7)(a) An eligible entity may revoke a cooperative agreement before the end of the 460 cooperative agreement's term by: 461 (i) informing the division, in writing, of the eligible entity's intention to revoke the 462 cooperative agreement; or 463 (ii) failing to sign and return its annual financial statement, as described in 464 Subsection (6)(b), unless the director grants an extension. 465 (b) An eligible entity may not revoke a cooperative agreement before the end of the term 466 of a signed annual financial statement, as described in Subsection (6)(c). 467 (8)(a) The division shall develop and maintain a wildfire risk assessment mapping tool 468 that is online and publicly accessible. 469 (b)[(i)] The division shall analyze [adding an additional high-risk category] and - 14 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 470 establish by rule, made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 471 Administrative Rulemaking Act, boundaries for high risk wildland urban interface 472 property and what constitutes wildland urban interface property that is not high 473 risk within the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool described in Subsection 474 (8)(a): 475 [(A)] (i) using a scientific assessment; and 476 [(B)] (ii) that is focused on the risk to dwellings within the wildland[-] urban interface 477 area. 478 [(ii) The division shall report the results of the division's analysis under this 479 Subsection (8)(b) to the Natural Resources, Agriculture, and Environment Interim 480 Committee by no later than the 2024 November interim meeting of that committee.] 481 (c) With regard to the categories used within the wildfire risk assessment mapping tool 482 described in Subsection (8)(a), the division may adjust the assessment for 483 participation commitments if the adjustment is based on the Consumer Price Index 484 for All Urban Consumers as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the 485 United States Department of Labor, in accordance with a formula established by the 486 division by rule made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative 487 Rulemaking Act. 488 (9)(a) If the state under Section 15A-2-103 adopts an edition of the Utah Wildland 489 Urban Interface Code, issued by the International Code Council, with the alternatives 490 or amendments approved by the division, as a wildland urban interface building 491 standard that may be adopted by a local compliance agency: 492 (i) for purposes of an unincorporated area within a county, the county shall adopt and 493 enforce the wildland urban interface building standard described in this 494 Subsection (9)(a); and 495 (ii) for purposes of an incorporated area within a county, the relevant municipality 496 shall adopt and enforce the wildland urban interface building standard described 497 in this Subsection (9)(a). 498 (b) If a county or municipality fails to comply with Subsections (4)(f) and (9)(a), the 499 division may choose to not pay costs of the county or municipality under a 500 cooperative agreement executed under this section. 501 (c)(i) If the state adopts a different wildland urban interface building standard than 502 was previously adopted under Section 15A-2-103, a county or municipality has 503 two years from the date the state adopts the different wildland urban interface - 15 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 504 building standard to adopt the appropriate wildland urban interface building 505 standard. 506 (ii) If a county or municipality fails to adopt the appropriate wildland urban interface 507 building standard within the time period described in Subsection (9)(c)(i), the 508 division may choose to not pay costs of the county or municipality under a 509 cooperative agreement executed under this section beginning two years from the 510 day on which the state adopts the different wildland urban interface building 511 standard and until such time as the county or municipality adopts the appropriate 512 wildland urban interface building standard. 513 Section 6. Section 65A-8-215 is amended to read: 514 65A-8-215 . Wildland-urban interface fire prevention, preparedness, and 515 mitigation. 516 (1) As used in this section: 517 (a) "Prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund" means the Wildland-urban Interface 518 Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund created in this section. 519 (b) "Suppression fund" means the Wildland Fire Suppression Fund created in Section 520 65A-8-204. 521 (c) "Wildland-urban interface" means the zone where structures and other human 522 development meets, or intermingles with, undeveloped wildland. 523 (2)(a) There is created an expendable special revenue fund known as the 524 "Wildland-urban Interface Prevention, Preparedness, and Mitigation Fund." 525 (b) The prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund shall consist of: 526 (i) interest and earnings from the investment of money from the prevention, 527 preparedness, and mitigation fund; 528 (ii) money received as direct payment from cooperative wildfire system participation 529 commitments; 530 (iii) money appropriated by the Legislature;[ and] 531 (iv) money transferred to the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund under 532 Section 63J-1-314[.] ; and 533 (v) fees deposited into the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund under 534 Section 17-16-22. 535 (c) The division shall administer the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund to: 536 (i) pay costs of prevention and preparedness efforts on wildland-urban interface 537 within the state, as defined by the division by rule made in accordance with Title - 16 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 538 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, including costs of an 539 eligible entity that has entered into a cooperative agreement, as described in 540 Section 65A-8-203; 541 (ii) issue fire department assistance grants, which in the aggregate may not exceed 542 10% of the money in the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund each fiscal 543 year; and 544 (iii) in cases of catastrophic need as determined by the state forester, pay costs that 545 could be paid from the suppression fund under Section 65A-8-204. 546 (d) Disbursements from the prevention, preparedness, and mitigation fund may only be 547 made upon written order of the state forester or the state forester's authorized 548 representative. 549 (3)(a) The division may by rule, made in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 550 Administrative Rulemaking Act, establish criteria for community wildfire 551 preparedness plans addressing wildland-urban interface. The criteria shall require 552 action that is: 553 (i) qualitative and quantitative; and 554 (ii) leads to reduced wildfire risk. 555 (b) An eligible entity, as defined in Section 65A-8-203, shall agree to implement 556 prevention, preparedness, and mitigation actions identified in a community wildfire 557 preparedness plan addressing wildland-urban interface that is approved by the 558 division. 559 Section 7. Section 65A-8-401 is enacted to read: 560 Part 4. Wildland Urban Interface Property 561 65A-8-401 . Definitions. 562 As used in this section: 563 (1) "High risk wildland urban interface property" means property located within the 564 boundary of high risk wildland urban interface as designated by the wildfire risk 565 assessment tool in Subsection 65A-8-203(8)(a) and defined by rule made in accordance 566 with Subsection 65A-8-402(5)(a). 567 (2) "Triage scale" means a scale with three classifications adopted by the division to 568 evaluate and classify property located within the wildland urban interface as to what 569 actions are needed to prepare the property for fire. 570 (3) "Wildland urban interface" means the same as that term is defined in Section 571 65A-8a-102. - 17 - H.B. 48 Enrolled Copy 572 (4) "Wildland urban interface building standards" means the edition of the Utah Wildland 573 Urban Interface Code adopted under Section 15A-2-103. 574 (5) "Wildland urban interface coordinator" means a representative of the division or a 575 county who evaluates and classifies wildland urban interface property in accordance 576 with Section 65A-8-402. 577 (6) "Wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer" means the same as that term is 578 defined in Section 31A-22-1310. 579 Section 8. Section 65A-8-402 is enacted to read: 580 65A-8-402 . Evaluation of wildland urban interface property -- Fee amounts -- 581 Rulemaking. 582 (1)(a) The division shall establish a program under which a wildland urban interface 583 coordinator evaluates and classifies high risk wildland urban interface property using 584 a triage scale. 585 (b) The wildland urban interface coordinator shall be: 586 (i) a representative of the division; or 587 (ii) if the evaluation and classification is assigned to a county, a representative of the 588 county. 589 (c) At the beginning of each calendar year, the division shall determine whether to 590 assign evaluation and classification under this section of high risk wildland urban 591 interface property to a county. 592 (2) After completing the evaluation and classification under this section, the wildland urban 593 interface coordinator shall inform a property owner of property described in Subsection 594 (1)(a) of: 595 (a) the classification assigned to the property described in Subsection (1)(a) under the 596 triage scale; 597 (b) the fee the property owner shall pay under Section 17-16-22; and 598 (c) resources from the division or county that the property owner may access to bring the 599 property described in Subsection (1)(a) to the first or second classification by 600 applying wildland urban interface building standards. 601 (3) As part of the program established under this section, the division: 602 (a) may provide resources to a property owner described in Subsection (2)(b) to 603 facilitate the property owner bringing the property described in Subsection (1)(a) to 604 the first or second classification under the triage scale; and 605 (b) beginning on January 1, 2028, shall develop and maintain a database that may be - 18 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 48 606 accessed by a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to learn the 607 classification under the triage scale for any portion of high risk wildland urban 608 interface property to be covered by the wildland urban interface property and casualty 609 insurer. 610 (4)(a) The division shall annually set a fee amount that is based on the square footage of 611 a structure within the high risk wildland urban interface to pay for the costs 612 associated with the implementation of this part to be assessed and collected by a 613 county in accordance with Section 17-16-22. 614 (b) The division may tier the fee amount to account for what level on the triage scale a 615 property is assigned by a wildland urban interface coordinator. 616 (5) The division may make rules, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah 617 Administrative Rulemaking Act, to: 618 (a) define high risk wildland urban interface property and wildland urban interface 619 property that is not high risk as provided in Subsection 65A-8-203(8)(b); 620 (b) establish the criteria used to evaluate and classify property located within high risk 621 wildland urban interface property; 622 (c) create a process by which the division and counties communicate classifications 623 assigned to property described in Subsection (1)(a); 624 (d) create a process for communicating to a property owner the information described in 625 Subsection (2); 626 (e) establish how the division may provide resources under Subsection (3); 627 (f) create a process for a wildland urban interface property and casualty insurer to learn 628 the classification described in Subsection (3)(b); and 629 (g) establish how the fee amount described in Subsection (4) is set. 630 Section 9. Section 65A-8-403 is enacted to read: 631 65A-8-403 . Liability. 632 This part does not create a cause of action against the state, the division, an officer, 633 employee, or consultant of the division, a county, or a wildland urban interface coordinator for 634 an act or failure to act under this part and does not waive governmental immunity in 635 accordance with Subsection 63G-7-201(5). 636 Section 10. Effective Date. 637 This bill takes effect on January 1, 2026. - 19 - SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/29/2025 Date Sent to Council: 10/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Norris, Nick E-mail nick.norris@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 10/03/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 10/07/2025 Subject: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Text Amendment Additional Staff Contact: Tony Allred anthony.allred@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Nick Norris nick.norris@slc.gov anthony.allred@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the proposed text amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process 45 day public engagement process and Planning Commission Public Hearing have been completed. The City Council is required to hold a public hearing prior to making a decision regarding this text amendment. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Earlier this year the Utah Legislature passed a law that requires cities to adopt the same wildland urban interface (WUI) code that the State has adopted to be eligible for state level financial reimbursement for fighting wildfires. The state requires cities to adopt this fire code before January 1, 2026 to avoid being noncompliant. The Utah Code requires adoption if the wildland urban interface is at least 640 acres. The total land area of the parcels and lots that would be subject to the WUI code in Salt Lake City is more than 1900 acres. This text amendment would adopt what the same WUI Code identified in Utah Code. A WUI code includes special regulations intended to: • Reducing the risk created by wildfires; • Protect life and property; • Support emergency management best practices; WUI codes are typically applied to properties that are next to or close to larger areas with natural vegetation. Adoption of the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code would subject certain properties to additional fire code requirements related to the construction of new buildings, additions to existing buildings, roofing materials, building materials, and creating defensible space be adding specific landscaping provisions intended to provide spaces between landscaping and buildings. The Fire Department has created a map that shows which properties would be subject to the WUI code. The map is intended to be adopted as part of Title 18 and will not be part of the zoning map because the regulations are building code regulations, not zoning regulations. Only the properties highlighted in the attached map would be subject to the WUI code. The map is attached to the adopting ordinance and found in Planning Commission records. If a property is not highlighted on the map, the WUI code would not apply. The proposal will give precedence to the fire code in situations where the Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code and the Zoning Code conflict. The zoning code does regulate building materials, fence materials, and landscaping that may not be allowed under the WUI code. This is likely to occur in the Foothill Residential Zoning Districts, in low density residential zones and local historic districts where properties are adjacent to natural lands, and potentially in other zoning districts where building materials and landscaping are regulated. It may also impact the setbacks of some types of buildings, including garages and sheds, because WUI codes typically require larger setbacks than what the city’s zoning code requires. PUBLIC PROCESS: City Code 21A.10 does not require a 45-day public engagement period for text amendments that are necessary to bring the city code into compliance with state or federal law. However, this item did include a 45-day public input period that started on August 7, 2025 and ended on September 21, 2025. This item was posted on the Planning Division Open House website during this timeframe and all property owners were mailed a notice of the pending code amendment. In addition, the Fire Department presented the proposal to the following recognized organizations: • Capitol Hill • Yalecrest • Sugarhouse • Greater Avenues • Wasatch Hollow • East Bench • Rose Park (parcels removed from final map) • Fairpark (parcels removed from final map) • Glendale (parcels removed from final map) • East Liberty Planning Subcommittee (9/11/2025) A summary of the public input can be found in the Planning Commission records. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 24, 2025 b) PC Minutes of September 24, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report EXHIBITS: The following is a list of attachments/files to be included in the final transmittal via Laserfiche. These files do not need to be combined into a single PDF; they can be uploaded as separate attachments. Please ensure that each Exhibit is saved with the exact file name specified below. 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Public Comments Received After Staff Report Publication 5) Mailing List 6) Original Petition This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE 1. ORDINANCE V1 1 Project Title: Adopting the Utah Wildland-Urban Interface Code Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00554 Version: 1 Date Prepared: 9/29/2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended 9/24/2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): Sections 1 and 2: Establishes the adoption of the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as adopted by the State of Utah; Section 3: Adopts the Salt Lake City Wildland-Urban Interface Map by reference in 18.44 International Fire Code and Standards Adopted; Section 4: Updates 21A.34.010 by adding a new section that gives precedence to the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code over any conflicting provision of an overlay zoning district; and Section 5: Modifies 21A.36.010 to give precedence to the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code over any conflicting provision found in Title 21A. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1. Adopts the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code amending Section 18.04.040 as follows:1 18.04.040: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CODES ADOPTED: 2 3 The following codes, as adopted by the State of Utah, along with any adopted appendices are hereby 4 adopted as part of the code of Salt Lake City: 5 The International Building Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code; 6 The International Residential Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code; 7 The International Fire Code; 8 International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, as promulgated by Title 15A of the Utah State Code 9 International Existing Building Code; 10 International Energy Conservation Code; 11 International Fuel Gas Code; 12 National Electrical Code; 13 The International Mechanical Code; 14 The International Plumbing Code; 15 The International Swimming Pool and Spa Code; 16 Rule R156-56 of the Utah Administrative Code; 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney September 29, 2025 V1 2 ICC/MBI 1205-2021 Standard for Off-Site Construction: Inspection and Regulatory Compliance, or its 18 successor, and 19 1997 Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. 20 21 2. Adopts the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code adopted by the State of Utah into the fire22 prevention standards administered by the Fire Department by amending Section 18.44.010 as 23 follows: 24 18.44.010: INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND STANDARDS ADOPTED: 25 A. The edition of the international fire code as adopted by section 15A-5-103, Utah Code Annotated,26 or its successor section is adopted by Salt Lake City as the fire code ordinance, rules and regulations of 27 the city. Appendices A, B, C, E, F, G of the international fire code are specifically adopted by Salt Lake 28 City as part of the fire code of the city. Appendix D of the international fire code, including the 29 amendments to subsection D105.3 provided in Salt Lake City Code section 18.44.020, is also specifically 30 adopted by Salt Lake City as part of the fire code of the city. Hereafter, all references in this code to the 31 fire code shall mean the edition adopted by section 15A-5-103, Utah Code Annotated, or its successor 32 section, together with its appendices. One copy of the international fire code shall be filed for use and 33 examination by the public in the office of the city recorder. 34 B.The Utah Wildland Urban Interface Code as adopted by Utah Code Section 15A-2-103, or its35 successor, is adopted by Salt Lake City as the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code as part of 36 the fire code of the city. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code applies to property shown on 37 the “Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map,” a copy of which shall be maintained on file with the 38 Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office. 39 3. Adopts the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map as referenced in proposed Subsection40 18.44.010.B and as shown in Attachment A. A list of the properties affected by this map is provided in 41 Attachment B. In the event of a conflict between Attachment A and Attachment B, Attachment A will 42 govern. The Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map declares the wildland urban interface 43 areas within the city and is based on the following findings of fact: 44 A.The Salt Lake City Wildland-Urban Interface Map is based on an assessment of fuel types and45 physical characteristics affecting likely wildland fire behavior within the city; 46 B.That the city is situated on or near two fault lines the Wasatch Fault and the West Valley Fault,47 both capable of generating earthquakes of significant magnitude. These faults are subject to becoming 48 active at any time; the city is particularly vulnerable to devastation should such an earthquake occur. The 49 potential effects of earthquake activity include restricting or eliminating internal circulation due to the 50 potential for collapsing of highway overpasses and underpasses, earth slides, and the potential for vertical 51 movement rendering surface travel unduly burdensome or impossible. Additional potential situations 52 inherent in such an occurrence include loss of the city’s water sources, including local reservoirs, water 53 mains, and storage facilities; broken natural gas mains causing structure and other fires; leakage of 54 V1 3 hazardous materials; the need for rescues from collapsed structures; and the rendering of first aid and 55 other medical attention to large numbers of people. The protection of human life and the preservation of 56 property in the event of such an occurrence support the imposition of fire-protection requirements greater 57 than those set forth in the International Building Code or International Fire Code. 58 C. Seasonal climatic conditions during the summer and fall create numerous serious difficulties 59 regarding the control of and protection against fires in the city. The hot, dry weather typical of this area, 60 coupled with very wet winter and spring conditions that can create abundant grass and shrub fuels that 61 can elevate fire risk, results in wildfires that threaten or could threaten the city. Although some code 62 requirements, such as fire-resistive roof classification, have a direct bearing on building survival in a 63 wildland fire situation, others, such as residential automatic sprinklers, may also have a positive effect. In 64 the city’s dry and generally low humidity climate, many materials are much more easily ignited. More 65 fires are likely to occur and any fire, once started, can expand extremely rapidly. Residential automatic 66 sprinklers can arrest a fire starting within a structure before the fire is able to spread to adjacent brush and 67 structures. The aforementioned problems support the imposition of fire protection requirements greater 68 than those set forth in the International Building Code or International Fire Code. 69 4. Amends Section 21A.34.010 only as to include a new subsection “c” as follows: 70 C. Except as described below with respect to the RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District, the 71 provisions of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code, as adopted in Title 18, shall take 72 precedence over any conflicting provision of an overlay zoning district in this chapter as to those 73 properties shown on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map. If a building permit is submitted 74 that includes plans that may create a conflict between application of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban 75 Interface Code and the RCO Riparian Corridor Overlay District, the Salt Lake City Fire Chief and the 76 Director of the Department of Public Utilities, or their designees, will coordinate permit approvals for 77 work in applicable areas to assure that the plans associated with the permit meets the intent and 78 performance of both the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code and the RCO Riparian Corridor 79 Overlay District. 80 5. Amends Section 21A.36.010 Use of Lands and Buildings only by adding a new subsection F to 81 indicate that the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code takes precedence over any conflicting 82 provision found in title 21A. 83 F. Regulations Conflicting with the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code. The Salt Lake 84 City Wildland Urban Interface Code as adopted in Title 18 shall take precedence when a provision of 85 Title 21A conflicts with a provision of the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Code, but only as to 86 those properties shown on the Salt Lake City Wildland Urban Interface Map. 87 6. Effective Date: This ordinance, if passed, shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake City Recorder. [end] I S t 100 S 200 S 300 S F S t J S t H S t G S t K S t L S t 1st Ave E S t D S t 2nd Ave B S t C S t 11th Ave A S t M S t 5th Ave 9th Ave N S t U S t City Creek Cyn 30 0 E 40 0 E 50 0 E 60 0 E 13th Ave 11 0 0 E 10 0 0 E 12 0 0 E 13 0 0 E P S t Chan d l e r D r R S t 16th Ave 18th Ave Can y o n R d Al t a S t Tomahawk Dr Wasa t c h D r Oa k F o r e s t R d Arlingt o n D r Wo l c o t t S t Can y o n O a k s W a y 185 0 E 14 0 0 E Kristianna Cir Hanover Dr Alameda Ave 15 5 0 E 14th Ave Voyles Pl M S t Avenues Planning Community ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550Feet Attachment A Bec k S t I-1 5 S B F w y I-1 5 N B F w y 600 N 90 0 W 40 0 W Wa r m S p r i n g s R d F S t 500 N 400 N 30 0 W 50 0 W Vict o r y R d E S t D S t 80 0 W UPR R M a i n O n e R d 20 0 W Can y o n R d B S t Ea s t C a p i t o l B l v d 1000 N 60 0 W 10 0 0 W 1200 N Sa n d h u r s t D r Mai n S t 800 N Co l u m b u s S t Be c k S t r e e t F r t g 70 0 W 1500 N Oa k F o r e s t R d Ch i c a g o S t 11 0 0 W La f a y e t t e D r Ardmore Pl 11 0 0 W 400 N 800 N 90 0 W Capitol Hill Planning Community ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,200 2,400 3,600600Feet 23 0 0 E 2100 S I-80 EB Fw y I-80 WB Fwy 1300 S 1700 S Parley s W a y Sce n i c D r 25 0 0 E Sherwood Dr 900 S La k e l i n e D r Da l l i n S t Wasatch Dr Foo t h i l l D r Crestview Dr Heritage Way Don n e r W a y Te x a s S t Comanche Dr Moha w k W a y Sunnyside Ave Ut e D r Wilson Ave Su m m i t C i r Sce n i c D r Foo t h i l l D r 23 0 0 E East Bench Planning Community: Emigration Canyon-Parleys Canyon ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550Feet 11 0 0 E 19 0 0 E 15 0 0 E 1300 S 1700 S 17 0 0 E 800 S 18 0 0 E 900 S Emerson Ave 16 0 0 E Harvard Ave Harrison Ave Sunnyside Ave Garfield Ave Roosevelt Ave Sherman Ave 12 0 0 E Browning Ave Westminster Ave Yalecrest Ave Mc C l e l l a n d S t Yale Ave Laird Ave 13 0 0 E Bryan Ave Blaine Ave Logan Ave Dies t e l R d Ramona Ave Michigan Ave Hubbard Ave Wilson Ave Mi l i t a r y D r Hollywood Ave Gilmer D r Kensington Ave Wood Ave Princeton Ave Downington Ave Herbert Ave Do u g l a s S t 14 0 0 E Co l o n i a l D r Thornton Ave El i z a b e t h S t 18 0 0 E 13 0 0 E Ramona Ave 140 0 E 900 S Laird Ave 14 0 0 E 16 0 0 E Blaine Ave 12 0 0 E 1700 S 17 0 0 E Harvard Ave 18 0 0 E Sunnyside Ave Mc C l e l l a n d S t East Bench Planning Community: Emigration and Red Butte Creeks ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 650 1,300 1,950325Feet 900 S 1300 S 1700 S 21 0 0 E 17 0 0 E Sunnyside Ave 23 0 0 E 18 0 0 E Foo t h i l l D r 16 0 0 E Waka r a W a y Sherwood Dr Ma r i o C a p e c c h i D r Wasatch Dr Yale Ave 500 S Hubbard Ave Arape e n D r Medic a l E a s t D r Red B u t t e R d Valde z D r Pollo c k R d Crestview Dr Don n e r W a y Colo r o w D r Kensington Ave Bryan Ave Comanche Dr 1900 E Skyline D r 22 0 0 E Baker S t Lewis St 180 0 E Lai r d W a y Arling t o n D r 24 0 0 E Hanover Dr Do v e r R d 15 5 0 E 1700 S Sunnyside Ave 19 0 0 E Yale Ave Wasa t c h D r Hubbard Ave East Bench Planning Community: University of Utah-Emigration Canyon ¯ Salt Lake City Planning Division 9/25/2025 WUI_Parcels_20250903 0 1,100 2,200 3,300550Feet OBJECTID *PARCEL_SID HOUSE_NBRST_DIR ST_NAME ST_TYPE UNIT CITY STATE ZIPCODE COUNTY PROP_LOCATION 109 16-11-201-001-0000 2988 E EMIGRATIO RD Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2988 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 116 16-16-179-007-0000 1569 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1569 S 1600 E 117 16-16-179-008-0000 1575 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 S 1600 E 118 16-16-179-009-0000 1583 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 S 1600 E 119 16-16-179-010-0000 1589 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1589 S 1600 E 120 16-16-179-011-0000 1593 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1593 S 1600 E 121 16-16-179-013-0000 1603 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 S 1600 E 122 16-16-179-014-0000 1609 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1609 S 1600 E 123 16-16-179-018-0000 1629 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1629 S 1600 E 124 16-16-179-019-0000 1637 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1637 S 1600 E 125 16-16-179-020-0000 1655 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1655 S 1600 E 126 16-16-179-021-0000 1695 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1695 S 1600 E 127 16-16-179-029-0000 1646 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1646 E KENSINGTON AVE 128 16-16-179-030-0000 1596 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1596 S 1700 E 129 16-16-179-032-0000 1631 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 130 16-16-179-034-0000 1603 S 1600 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 131 16-16-179-035-0000 1609 S 1600 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 S 1600 E 132 16-16-179-036-0000 1597 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 133 16-16-179-037-0000 1599 S 1600 E NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1597 S 1600 E 134 16-16-179-038-0000 1611 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1611 S 1600 E 135 16-16-179-040-0000 1619 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1619 S 1600 E 136 16-16-179-041-0000 1625 S 1600 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1625 S 1600 E 137 16-16-180-014-0000 1600 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1600 E 1700 S 138 16-16-180-015-0000 1604 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1604-1606 E 1700 S 139 16-16-180-016-0000 1610 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1610 E 1700 S 140 16-16-180-017-0000 1620 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1620 E 1700 S 141 16-16-180-018-0000 1640 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1640 E 1700 S 144 16-16-209-007-0000 1759 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1759 E ROSECREST DR 145 16-16-209-012-0000 1751 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1751 E ROSECREST DR 146 16-16-209-013-0000 1743 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1743 E ROSECREST DR 147 16-16-209-014-0000 1741 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1741 E ROSECREST DR 148 16-16-209-015-0000 1739 E ROSECRES DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 E ROSECREST DR 149 16-16-209-016-0000 1455 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1455 S 1700 E 150 16-16-209-017-0000 1499 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1453 S 1700 E 182 16-16-251-006-0000 1680 E EMERSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1680 E EMERSON AVE 183 16-16-251-008-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 184 16-16-252-001-0000 1650 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE 185 16-16-252-002-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 186 16-16-252-003-0000 1650 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE #RE 187 16-16-252-004-0000 1665 E KENSINGTOAVE NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1665 E KENSINGTON AVE 188 16-16-252-013-0000 1614 S 1700 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 189 16-16-252-014-0000 1614 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1614 S 1700 E 190 16-16-252-015-0000 1604 S 1700 E NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 191 16-16-252-017-0000 1626 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1626 S 1700 E 192 16-16-252-018-0000 1602 S 1700 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1631 E 1700 S 193 16-16-253-005-0000 1646 E 1700 S Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1646 E 1700 S 194 16-16-254-001-0000 1739 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 E KENSINGTON AVE 195 16-16-254-002-0000 1735 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1735 E KENSINGTON AVE 196 16-16-254-003-0000 1729 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1729 E KENSINGTON AVE 197 16-16-254-004-0000 1725 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1725 E KENSINGTON AVE 198 16-16-254-005-0000 1719 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1719 E KENSINGTON AVE 199 16-16-254-006-0000 1715 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1715 E BRYAN AVE 200 16-16-254-007-0000 1709 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1709 E BRYAN AVE 201 16-16-254-008-0000 1705 E BRYAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1705 E BRYAN AVE 202 16-16-254-009-0000 1745 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1745 E KENSINGTON AVE 203 16-16-254-010-0000 1749 E KENSINGTOAVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1749 E KENSINGTON AVE 204 16-16-305-025-0000 1750 S 1500 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1750 S 1500 E 205 16-16-305-026-0000 1444 E WILSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1760 S 1500 E 206 16-16-306-013-0000 1445 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1445 E DOWNINGTON AVE 207 16-16-307-001-0000 1324 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1324-1326 DOWNINGTON AVE 208 16-16-307-002-0000 1334 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1334 E DOWNINGTON AVE 209 16-16-307-003-0000 1344 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1344 E DOWNINGTON AVE 210 16-16-307-004-0000 1350 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1350 E DOWNINGTON AVE 211 16-16-307-005-0000 1358 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1358-1360 DOWNINGTON AVE 212 16-16-307-006-0000 1366 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1366 E DOWNINGTON AVE 213 16-16-307-007-0000 1374 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1374 E DOWNINGTON AVE 214 16-16-307-008-0000 1382 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1384 E DOWNINGTON AVE 215 16-16-307-009-0000 1390 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1390 E DOWNINGTON AVE 216 16-16-307-010-0000 1396 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1396-1398 DOWNINGTON AVE 217 16-16-307-011-0000 1414 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1414 E DOWNINGTON AVE 218 16-16-307-012-0000 1416 E DOWNINGTAVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1416 E DOWNINGTON AVE Attachment B 219 16-16-307-013-0000 1422 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1422 E DOWNINGTON AVE 220 16-16-307-014-0000 1432 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1432 E DOWNINGTON AVE 221 16-16-307-015-0000 1440 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1440 E DOWNINGTON AVE 222 16-16-307-016-0000 1446 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1446 E DOWNINGTON AVE 223 16-16-307-017-0000 1328 E ALLEN PAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1328 E ALLEN PARK DR 224 16-16-307-018-0000 1838 S 1500 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1838 S 1500 E 225 16-16-327-001-0000 1504 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1504 E GLEN ARBOR ST 226 16-16-327-002-0000 1510 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1510 E GLEN ARBOR ST 227 16-16-327-003-0000 1516 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1516 E GLEN ARBOR ST 228 16-16-327-004-0000 1522 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1522 E GLEN ARBOR ST 229 16-16-327-005-0000 1528 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1528 E GLEN ARBOR ST 230 16-16-327-007-0000 1538 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST 231 16-16-327-008-0000 1544 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1544 E GLEN ARBOR ST 232 16-16-327-009-0000 1550 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1550 E GLEN ARBOR ST 233 16-16-327-010-0000 1556 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1556 E GLEN ARBOR ST 234 16-16-327-011-0000 1562 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1562 E GLEN ARBOR ST 235 16-16-327-012-0000 1570 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1570 E GLEN ARBOR ST 236 16-16-327-013-0000 1578 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1578 E GLEN ARBOR ST 237 16-16-327-014-0000 1591 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1591 E GLEN ARBOR ST 238 16-16-327-016-0000 1588 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1588 E GLEN ARBOR ST 239 16-16-327-017-0000 1584 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1584 E GLEN ARBOR ST 240 16-16-327-018-0000 1551 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake <Null> 241 16-16-327-019-0000 1605 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1605-1607 E BLAINE AVE 242 16-16-327-021-0000 1623 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1623 E BLAINE AVE 243 16-16-327-022-0000 1635 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1635 E BLAINE AVE 244 16-16-327-025-0000 1532 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1532 E GLEN ARBOR ST 245 16-16-327-026-0000 1536 E GLEN ARBO ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST 246 16-16-327-027-0000 1592 E GLEN ARBO ST Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1592 E GLEN ARBOR ST 247 16-16-327-029-0000 1592 E GLEN ARBO ST NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E BLAINE AVE 248 16-16-327-030-0000 1615 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E BLAINE AVE 249 16-16-328-001-0000 1514 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1514 E BLAINE AVE 250 16-16-328-005-0000 1526 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1526 E BLAINE AVE 251 16-16-328-006-0000 1532 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1532 E BLAINE AVE 252 16-16-328-007-0000 1540 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1540 E BLAINE AVE 253 16-16-328-008-0000 1548 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1548 E BLAINE AVE 254 16-16-328-009-0000 1554 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1554 E BLAINE AVE 255 16-16-328-010-0000 1558 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1558 E BLAINE AVE 256 16-16-328-011-0000 1564 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1564 E BLAINE AVE 257 16-16-328-012-0000 1572 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1572 E BLAINE AVE 258 16-16-328-013-0000 1580 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1580 E BLAINE AVE 259 16-16-328-022-0000 1586 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1586 E BLAINE AVE 260 16-16-330-001-0000 1603 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1602 E BLAINE AVE 261 16-16-330-002-0000 1612 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1612-1614 E BLAINE AVE 262 16-16-330-003-0000 1616 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1616-1618 E BLAINE AVE 263 16-16-330-004-0000 1626 E BLAINE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1626 E BLAINE AVE 264 16-16-330-008-0000 1603 E WILSON AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1603 E WILSON AVE 265 16-16-351-001-0000 1325 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1325 E WESTMINSTER AVE 266 16-16-351-002-0000 1329 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1329 E WESTMINSTER AVE 267 16-16-351-003-0000 1335 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1335 E WESTMINSTER AVE 268 16-16-351-004-0000 1341 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1341 E WESTMINSTER AVE 269 16-16-351-005-0000 1343 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1343 E WESTMINSTER AVE 270 16-16-351-006-0000 1357 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1357 E WESTMINSTER AVE 271 16-16-351-007-0000 1363 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1363 E WESTMINSTER AVE 272 16-16-351-008-0000 1369 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1369 E WESTMINSTER AVE 273 16-16-351-009-0000 1375 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1375 E WESTMINSTER AVE 274 16-16-351-010-0000 1379 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1379 E WESTMINSTER AVE 275 16-16-355-001-0000 1403 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1403 E WESTMINSTER AVE 276 16-16-355-002-0000 1413 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1413 E WESTMINSTER AVE 277 16-16-355-003-0000 1421 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1421 E WESTMINSTER AVE 278 16-16-355-004-0000 1427 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1427 E WESTMINSTER AVE 279 16-16-355-005-0000 1433 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1433 E WESTMINSTER AVE 280 16-16-355-006-0000 1441 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1441 E WESTMINSTER AVE 295 16-17-430-003-0000 1877 S 1300 E Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1877 S 1300 E 296 16-17-430-005-0000 1319 E WESTMINS AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1319 E WESTMINSTER AVE 297 16-17-430-006-0000 1310 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1310 E DOWNINGTON AVE 298 16-17-430-007-0000 1312 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1312 E DOWNINGTON AVE 299 16-17-430-008-0000 1314 E DOWNINGT AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1314 E DOWNINGTON AVE 300 16-17-430-010-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1311 E WESTMINSTER AVE 301 16-17-431-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 100 302 16-17-431-002-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 101 303 16-17-431-003-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 102 304 16-17-431-004-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 103 305 16-17-431-005-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E # 104 306 16-17-431-006-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1871 S 1300 E 337 16-09-182-002-0000 973 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 973 S DIESTEL RD 338 16-09-182-003-0000 971 S DIESTEL RD NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 971 S DIESTEL RD # REAR 339 16-09-182-004-0000 971 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 971 S DIESTEL RD 340 16-09-182-005-0000 965 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 965 S DIESTEL RD 341 16-09-182-006-0000 963 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 963 S DIESTEL RD 342 16-09-182-007-0000 957 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 957 S DIESTEL RD 343 16-09-182-011-0000 953 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 953 S DIESTEL RD 344 16-09-182-012-0000 951 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 951 S DIESTEL RD 345 16-09-182-014-0000 939 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 939 S DIESTEL RD 346 16-09-182-015-0000 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE 347 16-09-252-001-0000 1707 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1707 E 900 S 348 16-09-252-002-0000 867 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 867 S DIESTEL RD 349 16-09-252-003-0000 861 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 861 S DIESTEL RD 350 16-09-252-004-0000 855 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 855 S DIESTEL RD 351 16-09-252-005-0000 851 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 851 S DIESTEL RD 352 16-09-252-006-0000 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 353 16-09-252-009-0000 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 354 16-09-253-001-0000 1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 355 16-09-253-007-0000 1731 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1731 E 900 S 356 16-09-253-008-0000 1741 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1741 E 900 S 357 16-09-253-009-0000 1757 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1757 E 900 S 358 16-09-253-020-0000 1763 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 359 16-09-255-001-0000 935 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 935 S DIESTEL RD 360 16-09-255-002-0000 931 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 931 S DIESTEL RD 361 16-09-255-003-0000 927 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 927 S DIESTEL RD 362 16-09-255-004-0000 923 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 923 S DIESTEL RD 363 16-09-255-005-0000 915 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 915 S DIESTEL RD 364 16-09-255-006-0000 913 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 913 S DIESTEL RD 365 16-09-255-007-0000 911 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 911 S DIESTEL RD 366 16-09-255-008-0000 907 S DIESTEL RD Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 907 S DIESTEL RD 367 16-09-255-009-0000 1702 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1702 E 900 S 368 16-09-255-010-0000 1710 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1710 E 900 S 369 16-09-256-002-0000 986 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 986 S MILITARY DR 370 16-09-256-005-0000 976 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 976 S MILITARY DR 371 16-09-256-006-0000 972 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 972 S MILITARY DR 372 16-09-256-007-0000 968 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 968 S MILITARY DR 373 16-09-256-008-0000 966 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 966 S MILITARY DR 374 16-09-256-011-0000 944 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 944 S MILITARY DR 375 16-09-256-012-0000 938 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 938 S MILITARY DR 376 16-09-256-013-0000 932 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 932 S MILITARY DR 377 16-09-256-014-0000 928 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 928 S MILITARY DR 378 16-09-256-015-0000 922 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 922 S MILITARY DR 379 16-09-256-016-0000 916 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 916 S MILITARY DR 380 16-09-256-017-0000 910 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 910 S MILITARY DR 381 16-09-256-018-0000 904 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 904 S MILITARY DR 382 16-09-256-020-0000 988 S MILITARY DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 988 S MILITARY DR # NFF1 383 16-09-256-021-0000 980 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 980 S MILITARY DR 384 16-09-256-022-0000 964 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 964 S MILITARY DR 385 16-09-256-024-0000 954 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 954 S MILITARY DR 427 16-09-327-007-0000 1575 E YALECREST AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 E YALECREST AVE 428 16-09-327-008-0000 1583 E YALECREST AVE NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 E YALECREST AVE 429 16-09-327-011-0000 1540 E BONNEVIEW DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1540 E BONNEVIEW DR 430 16-09-327-012-0000 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE 431 16-09-328-001-0000 1726 E 900 S Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 432 16-09-328-002-0000 1505 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1505 E YALE AVE 433 16-09-328-003-0000 1521 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1521 E YALE AVE 434 16-09-328-005-0000 1537 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1537 E YALE AVE 435 16-09-328-006-0000 1547 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1547 E YALE AVE 436 16-09-328-007-0000 1553 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1553 E YALE AVE 437 16-09-328-008-0000 1561 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1561 E YALE AVE 438 16-09-328-009-0000 1575 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1575 E YALECREST AVE 439 16-09-328-010-0000 1583 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1583 E YALECREST AVE 440 16-09-328-011-0000 1589 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1589 E YALECREST AVE 441 16-09-328-012-0000 1601 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1601 E YALECREST AVE 442 16-09-328-013-0000 1607 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1607 E YALECREST AVE 443 16-09-328-014-0000 1615 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1615 E YALECREST AVE 444 16-09-328-015-0000 1619 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1619 E YALECREST AVE 445 16-09-328-016-0000 1627 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1627 E YALECREST AVE 446 16-09-328-017-0000 1635 E YALECREST AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1635 E YALECREST AVE 447 16-09-328-018-0000 1030 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1030 S MILITARY DR 448 16-09-328-019-0000 1020 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1020 S MILITARY DR 449 16-09-328-020-0000 1016 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1016 S MILITARY DR 450 16-09-328-021-0000 1000 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1000 S MILITARY DR 451 16-09-328-022-0000 1521 E YALE AVE NFF Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1521 E YALE AVE 452 16-09-328-024-0000 1529 E YALE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84105 Salt Lake 1529 E YALE AVE 453 16-09-401-002-0000 994 S MILITARY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 994 S MILITARY DR 1012 16-23-179-018-0000 2962 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2962 E BENCHMARK DR 1013 16-23-179-019-0000 2377 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2377 S SUMMIT CIR 1014 16-23-179-020-0000 2387 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2387 S SUMMIT CIR 1015 16-23-251-003-0000 2378 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2378 S CANNON POINT DR 1016 16-23-251-004-0000 2379 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2379 S CANNON POINT DR 1017 16-23-251-006-0000 2396 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2396 S CANNON POINT DR 1018 16-23-251-008-0000 2404 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2404 S CANNON POINT DR 1019 16-23-251-010-0000 2424 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2424 S CANNON POINT DR 1020 16-23-251-012-0000 2438 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2438 S CANNON POINT DR 1021 16-23-251-014-0000 2484 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2484 S CANNON POINT DR 1022 16-23-331-001-0000 2401 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2401 S SUMMIT CIR 1023 16-23-331-002-0000 2423 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2423 S SUMMIT CIR 1024 16-23-331-003-0000 2439 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2439 S SUMMIT CIR 1025 16-23-331-004-0000 2455 S SUMMIT CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2455 S SUMMIT CIR 1026 16-23-331-005-0000 2465 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2465 S PROMONTORY DR 1027 16-23-331-015-0000 2531 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2531 S SCENIC DR 1028 16-23-331-016-0000 2477 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2477 S PROMONTORY DR 1029 16-23-331-017-0000 2495 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2495 S PROMONTORY DR 1030 16-23-331-018-0000 2513 S PROMONTO DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2513 S PROMONTORY DR 1031 16-23-451-001-0000 2569 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2569 S SCENIC DR 1032 16-23-251-018-0000 2554 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3042 E CANNON POINT DR 1033 16-14-306-042-0000 1800 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1800 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1034 16-14-306-043-0000 1795 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1795 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1035 16-14-306-016-0000 1847 S WASATCH DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1847 S WASATCH DR # NFF1 1036 16-14-306-017-0000 1871 S WASATCH DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1037 16-14-306-021-0000 1805 S MOHAWK WAY NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1038 16-14-306-022-0000 1799 S DEVONSHI DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1822 S LAKELINE DR 1039 16-14-306-024-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF4 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1040 16-14-306-025-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF5 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1041 16-14-306-027-0000 1867 S WASATCH DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1042 16-14-306-029-0000 1819 S MOHAWK WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1043 16-14-306-030-0000 1805 S MOHAWK WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1044 16-14-306-046-0000 1797 S DEVONSHI DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1045 16-14-306-050-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF6 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1046 16-14-306-051-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF7 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1047 16-14-326-016-0000 1763 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1807 S MOHAWK WY 1048 16-14-352-002-0000 1936 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1049 16-14-352-003-0000 1938 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1050 16-14-352-026-0000 1936 S SCENIC DR NFF3 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1051 16-14-353-001-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1935 S SCENIC DR 1052 16-14-353-002-0000 1945 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1945 S SCENIC DR 1053 16-14-353-003-0000 1955 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1955 S SCENIC DR 1054 16-14-353-004-0000 1961 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1961 S SCENIC DR 1055 16-14-353-005-0000 1969 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1969 S SCENIC DR 1056 16-14-353-006-0000 1977 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1977 S SCENIC DR 1057 16-14-353-007-0000 1985 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1985 S SCENIC DR 1058 16-14-353-008-0000 1995 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1995 S SCENIC DR 1059 16-14-353-009-0000 2005 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2005 S SCENIC DR 1060 16-14-353-010-0000 2015 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2015 S SCENIC DR 1061 16-14-353-011-0000 2025 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2025 S SCENIC DR 1062 16-14-353-012-0000 1937 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1063 16-14-353-013-0000 1939 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1064 16-14-353-015-0000 2777 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2777 E 2100 S 1065 16-14-353-016-0000 2090 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2090 S SCENIC CIR 1066 16-14-353-018-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1067 16-14-353-020-0000 1935 S SCENIC DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1068 16-14-353-022-0000 1940 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1936 S SCENIC DR 1069 16-14-353-024-0000 2084 S SCENIC CIR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2025 S SCENIC DR 1070 16-14-353-026-0000 2084 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2084 S SCENIC CIR 1071 16-14-353-032-0000 2076 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2076 S SCENIC CIR 1072 16-14-376-006-0000 2799 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2799 E 2100 S 1073 16-14-376-007-0000 2811 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2811 E 2100 S 1074 16-14-376-008-0000 2821 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2821 E 2100 S 1075 16-14-376-009-0000 2831 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2831 E 2100 S 1076 16-14-376-013-0000 2100 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2100 S BELAIRE DR 1077 16-14-376-014-0000 2084 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2084-2086 S BELAIRE DR 1078 16-14-376-015-0000 2080 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2080 S BELAIRE DR 1079 16-14-376-016-0000 2087 S BELAIRE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2087 S BELAIRE DR 1080 16-14-376-030-0000 1878 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1878 S LAKELINE DR 1081 16-14-376-031-0000 2052 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2052 S LAKELINE DR 1082 16-14-376-032-0000 2062 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2062 S LAKELINE DR 1083 16-14-376-041-0000 1820 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1084 16-14-376-042-0000 1830 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1830 S LAKELINE DR 1085 16-14-376-043-0000 1840 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1840 S LAKELINE DR 1086 16-14-376-044-0000 1856 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1856 S LAKELINE DR 1087 16-14-376-045-0000 1870 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1870 S LAKELINE DR 1088 16-14-376-048-0000 2002 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1972 S LAKELINE DR 1089 16-14-376-050-0000 2081 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2079 S SCENIC CIR 1090 16-14-376-052-0000 1822 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1091 16-14-376-053-0000 1822 S LAKELINE DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1820 S LAKELINE DR 1092 16-14-376-054-0000 1858 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1858 S LAKELINE DR 1093 16-14-376-055-0000 1864 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1868 S LAKELINE DR 1094 16-14-376-056-0000 2857 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2857 E 2100 S 1095 16-14-376-057-0000 2859 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2859 E 2100 S 1096 16-14-376-058-0000 2087 S SCENIC CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2087 S SCENIC CIR 1097 16-14-376-060-0000 2841 E 2100 S Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2841 E 2100 S 1098 16-14-378-001-0000 1825 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1825 S LAKELINE DR 1099 16-14-378-002-0000 1835 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1835 S LAKELINE DR 1100 16-14-378-003-0000 1849 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1849 S LAKELINE DR 1101 16-14-378-004-0000 1865 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1865 S LAKELINE DR 1102 16-14-400-043-4001 1995 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1972 S LAKELINE DR 1103 09-33-426-001-0000 251 N 1800 E Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1104 09-33-452-001-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1105 09-33-452-002-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1106 09-33-452-003-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1107 09-33-452-004-0000 1690 E NORTH CAM DR NFF3 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1108 09-33-452-006-0000 1696 E NORTH CAM DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1109 09-33-452-007-0000 1730 E NORTH CAM DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 111 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1110 09-33-452-014-2000 50 N MEDICAL E DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 100 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1111 09-33-452-014-6000 100 N MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 100 N MARIO CAPECCHI DR 1112 09-33-476-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1113 09-34-300-002-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1114 16-03-100-001-0000 2010 E MEDICAL S DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 320 S WAKARA WY 1115 16-03-100-004-2000 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1116 16-03-100-004-2004 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1117 16-03-100-004-6003 303 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 303 S CHIPETA WY 1118 16-03-100-004-6004 295 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S CHIPETA WY 1119 16-03-100-005-0000 295 S FORT DOUG BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1120 16-03-100-007-0000 295 S MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1121 16-03-100-008-0000 295 S MARIO CAP DR Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 295 S WASATCH DR 1122 16-03-300-002-2000 480 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 480 S WAKARA WY 1123 16-03-300-002-2001 375 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 375 S CHIPETA WY 1124 16-03-300-002-2002 390 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 390 S WAKARA WY 1125 16-03-300-002-2003 360 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 360 S WAKARA WY 1126 16-03-300-002-2004 400 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 400 S WAKARA WY 1127 16-03-300-002-2005 410 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 410 S CHIPETA WY 1128 16-03-300-002-2006 420 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 420 S CHIPETA WY 1129 16-03-300-002-2007 560 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 560 S ARAPEEN DR 1130 16-03-300-002-2008 391 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1131 16-03-300-002-2010 650 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 540 S ARAPEEN DR 1132 16-03-300-002-2012 420 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 420 S WAKARA WY 1133 16-03-300-002-2013 505 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 505 S WAKARA WY 1134 16-03-300-002-2014 540 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 650 S KOMAS DR 1135 16-03-300-002-2019 421 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 419 S WAKARA WY 1136 16-03-300-002-2020 419 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 421 S WAKARA WY 1137 16-03-300-002-2023 600 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 600 S KOMAS DR 1138 16-03-300-002-2024 500 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S CHIPETA WY 1139 16-03-300-002-2026 423 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 423 S WAKARA WY 1140 16-03-300-002-2027 615 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 615 S ARAPEEN DR 1141 16-03-300-002-2028 675 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 675 S ARAPEEN DR 1142 16-03-300-002-6001 375 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1143 16-03-300-002-6002 390 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 390 S WAKARA WY 1144 16-03-300-002-6003 360 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 360 S WAKARA WY 1145 16-03-300-002-6004 400 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 400 S WAKARA WY 1146 16-03-300-002-6005 410 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 410 S CHIPETA WY 1147 16-03-300-002-6006 420 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 420 S CHIPETA WY 1148 16-03-300-002-6007 560 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 560 S ARAPEEN DR 1149 16-03-300-002-6008 391 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 391 S CHIPETA WY 1150 16-03-300-002-6009 606 S BLACKHAW WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 606 S BLACKHAWK WY 1151 16-03-300-002-6010 650 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 540 S ARAPEEN DR 1152 16-03-300-002-6011 585 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 585 S KOMAS DR 1153 16-03-300-002-6012 420 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 420 S WAKARA WY 1154 16-03-300-002-6013 505 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 505 S WAKARA WY 1155 16-03-300-002-6014 540 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 650 S KOMAS DR 1156 16-03-300-002-6015 417 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 417 S WAKARA WY 1157 16-03-300-002-6019 421 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 419 S WAKARA WY 1158 16-03-300-002-6020 419 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 421 S WAKARA WY 1159 16-03-300-002-6021 480 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84113 Salt Lake 438 S WAKARA WY 1160 16-03-300-002-6023 600 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 600 S KOMAS DR 1161 16-03-300-002-6024 500 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S CHIPETA WY 1162 16-03-300-002-6026 423 S WAKARA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 423 S WAKARA WY 1163 16-03-300-002-6027 615 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 615 S ARAPEEN DR 1164 16-03-300-002-6028 675 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 675 S ARAPEEN DR 1165 16-03-400-001-0000 403 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 431 S CHIPETA WY 1166 16-03-400-003-0000 515 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1167 16-03-400-004-2000 501 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1168 16-03-400-004-2002 515 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1169 16-03-400-004-2004 575 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 575 S CHIPETA WY 1170 16-03-400-004-2005 579 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 579 S CHIPETA WY 1171 16-03-400-004-6002 497 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 515 S COLOROW DR 1172 16-03-400-004-6003 500 S HUNTSMAN WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 500 S HUNTSMAN WY 1173 16-03-400-004-6004 575 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 575 S CHIPETA WY 1174 16-03-400-004-6005 579 S CHIPETA WAY Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 577 S CHIPETA WY 1175 16-03-400-004-6007 383 S COLOROW DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 383 S COLOROW DR 1176 16-10-126-005-2000 714 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1177 16-10-126-005-2001 770 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 770 S KOMAS DR 1178 16-10-126-005-2002 790 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1179 16-10-126-005-2003 630 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 630 S KOMAS DR 1180 16-10-126-005-6001 770 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 770 S KOMAS DR 1181 16-10-126-005-6002 790 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 714 S ARAPEEN DR 1182 16-10-126-005-6003 630 S KOMAS DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 630 S KOMAS DR 1183 16-10-127-002-0000 785 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 785 S ARAPEEN DR 1184 16-10-127-003-0000 2255 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2255 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1185 16-10-127-004-0000 729 S ARAPEEN DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 729 S ARAPEEN DR 1186 16-10-127-006-0000 2301 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2301 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1187 16-10-226-002-0000 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1188 16-11-102-001-2000 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1189 16-11-102-001-6001 2601 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1190 16-11-102-003-0000 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2749 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1191 16-11-126-004-2000 2755 E SUNNYSIDE AVE Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2755 E SUNNYSIDE AVE 1192 09-19-452-001-0000 344 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 344 E OAK FOREST RD 1193 09-19-452-002-0000 380 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 380 E OAK FOREST RD 1194 09-19-452-004-0000 442 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 436 E OAK FOREST RD 1195 09-30-201-008-0000 1110 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1110 N OAK FOREST RD 1196 09-30-201-016-0000 310 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 310 E CANYON OAKS WY 1197 09-30-202-003-0000 1192 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1192 N OAK FOREST RD 1198 09-30-202-008-0000 302 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 302 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1199 09-30-202-009-0000 350 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 350 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1200 09-30-202-010-0000 378 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 378 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1201 09-30-202-011-0000 412 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 412 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1202 09-30-203-001-0000 1302 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1302 N OAK FOREST RD 1203 09-30-203-002-0000 1258 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1258 N OAK FOREST RD 1204 09-30-203-003-0000 337 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 337 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1205 09-30-203-004-0000 373 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 373 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1206 09-30-203-006-0000 407 E CAPITOL OA LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 407 E CAPITOL OAKS LN 1207 08-14-200-005-0000 2490 N BECK STRE FRTG Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2490 N BECK ST # FRTG 1208 08-14-400-003-0000 2100 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2140 N BECK ST # NFF3 1209 08-14-400-014-0000 2380 N BECK STRE FRTG Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2380 N BECK ST 1210 08-14-400-016-0000 2270 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2270 N BECK ST 1211 08-14-400-017-0000 2200 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2140 N BECK ST # NFF4 1212 08-14-400-020-0000 2080 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2080 N BECK ST 1213 08-23-201-001-0000 2082 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 2080 N BECK ST 1214 08-23-201-004-0000 1956 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1954 N BECK ST 1215 08-23-201-008-0000 1954 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1954 N BECK ST 1216 08-23-201-009-0000 1952 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1952 N BECK ST 1217 08-23-201-010-0000 1942 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1942 N BECK ST 1218 08-23-226-002-0000 1940 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1940 N BECK ST 1219 08-23-252-001-0000 1850 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1220 08-23-253-001-0000 1800 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1221 08-23-276-001-0000 1670 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1670 N BECK ST 1222 08-23-405-001-0000 1730 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1730 N BECK ST 1223 08-23-427-001-0000 1674 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1664 N BECK ST 1224 08-23-427-002-0000 1630 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1630 N BECK ST 1225 08-23-427-004-0000 1616 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1616 N BECK ST 1226 08-23-482-006-0000 1520 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1500 N BECK ST 1227 08-23-482-008-0000 1594 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1594 N BECK ST 1228 08-24-300-015-0000 1478 N BECK ST NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1594 N BECK ST # REAR 1229 08-24-300-017-0000 1450 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1450 N BECK ST 1230 08-24-300-019-0000 1398 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1398 N BECK ST 1231 08-24-300-020-0000 1476 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1514 N BECK ST 1232 08-25-102-003-0000 1370 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1370 N BECK ST 1233 08-25-102-005-0000 1340 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1340 N BECK ST 1234 08-25-126-002-0000 1234 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1234 N BECK ST 1235 08-25-126-003-0000 1224 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1212 N BECK ST 1236 08-25-126-006-0000 1200 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1200-1204 N BECK ST 1237 08-25-126-017-0000 1208 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1208 N BECK ST 1238 08-25-126-018-0000 1202 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1200-1204 N BECK ST 1239 08-25-126-020-0000 1320 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84116 Salt Lake 1264 N BECK ST 1240 08-25-126-021-0000 1180 N BECK ST Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1180 N BECK ST 1241 08-25-126-024-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1120 N VICTORY RD 1242 08-25-200-008-0000 1020 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1020 N VICTORY RD 1243 08-25-200-010-0000 1000 N VICTORY RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1000 N VICTORY RD 1244 08-25-404-001-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake <Null> 1245 08-25-276-001-0000 975 N CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 977 N CHURCHILL DR 1246 08-25-276-002-0000 7 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 7 E CHURCHILL DR 1247 08-25-276-003-0000 11 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 11 E CHURCHILL DR 1248 08-25-276-004-0000 15 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 15 E CHURCHILL DR 1249 08-25-276-005-0000 19 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 19 E CHURCHILL DR 1250 08-25-276-006-0000 951 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 982 N SANDHURST DR 1251 08-25-278-001-0000 943 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 943 N SANDHURST DR 1252 08-25-278-002-0000 1159 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR 1253 08-25-278-003-0000 1149 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1149 N TWICKENHAM DR 1254 08-25-278-004-0000 1135 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1135 N TWICKENHAM DR 1255 08-25-278-005-0000 1121 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1121 N TWICKENHAM DR 1256 08-25-278-006-0000 1107 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1107 N TWICKENHAM DR 1257 08-25-278-007-0000 60 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 60 W CRAGS CT 1258 08-25-278-009-0000 63 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 63 W CRAGS CT 1259 08-25-278-010-0000 53 W CRAGS CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 53 W CRAGS CT 1260 08-25-278-011-0000 1063 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1063 N TWICKENHAM DR 1261 08-25-278-013-0000 1160 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1160 N TWICKENHAM DR 1262 08-25-278-014-0000 1144 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1144 N TWICKENHAM DR 1263 08-25-278-015-0000 1130 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1130 N TWICKENHAM DR 1264 08-25-278-016-0000 1116 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1116 N TWICKENHAM DR 1265 08-25-278-017-0000 1102 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1102 N TWICKENHAM DR 1266 08-25-278-018-0000 1076 N TWICKENH DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1076 N TWICKENHAM DR 1267 08-25-278-019-0000 982 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 982 N SANDHURST DR 1268 08-25-428-002-0000 941 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 941 N SANDHURST DR 1269 08-25-428-003-0000 927 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 927 N SANDHURST DR 1270 08-25-428-004-0000 913 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 913 N SANDHURST DR 1271 08-25-428-005-0000 899 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 899 N SANDHURST DR 1272 08-25-428-006-0000 885 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 885 N SANDHURST DR 1273 08-25-428-007-0000 871 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 871 N SANDHURST DR 1274 08-25-428-008-0000 857 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 857 N SANDHURST DR 1275 08-25-428-009-0000 843 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 843 N SANDHURST DR 1276 08-25-428-010-0000 829 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 829 N SANDHURST DR 1277 08-25-428-011-0000 815 N SANDHURS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 815 N SANDHURST DR 1278 08-25-428-013-0000 8 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 8 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1279 08-25-428-014-0000 22 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 22 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1280 08-25-428-015-0000 36 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 36 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1281 08-25-428-016-0000 42 E KNIGHTSBR LN Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 42 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN 1282 09-19-300-006-0000 1283 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1291 N OAK FOREST RD 1283 09-19-300-009-0000 299 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 299 E OAK FOREST RD 1284 09-19-451-001-0000 349 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 349 E OAK FOREST RD 1285 09-19-451-002-0000 375 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 375 E OAK FOREST RD 1286 09-19-451-003-0000 403 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 403 E OAK FOREST RD 1287 09-19-451-004-0000 429 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 429 E OAK FOREST RD 1288 09-19-451-005-0000 457 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 457 E OAK FOREST RD 1289 09-19-476-001-0000 475 E OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 475 E OAK FOREST RD 1290 09-19-476-002-0000 1334 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1334 N CANYON OAKS WY 1291 09-30-101-001-0000 1075 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1075 N OAK FOREST RD 1292 09-30-101-009-0000 1233 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1233 N OAK FOREST RD 1293 09-30-101-011-0000 1173 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1173 N OAK FOREST RD 1294 09-30-101-016-0000 1201 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1201 N OAK FOREST RD 1295 09-30-101-018-0000 1065 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1075 N OAK FOREST RD 1296 09-30-101-019-0000 1061 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1061 N OAK FOREST RD 1297 09-30-101-020-0000 1261 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1261 N OAK FOREST RD 1298 09-30-101-023-0000 1043 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1043 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1299 09-30-101-025-0000 1141 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1141 N OAK FOREST RD 1300 09-30-101-026-0000 1101 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1101 N OAK FOREST RD 1301 09-30-151-004-0000 1048 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1048 N CHARTWELL CT 1302 09-30-151-005-0000 1046 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1046 N CHARTWELL CT 1303 09-30-151-006-0000 1040 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1040 N CHARTWELL CT 1304 09-30-151-007-0000 1036 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1036 N CHARTWELL CT 1305 09-30-151-008-0000 1045 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1045 N CHARTWELL CT 1306 09-30-151-009-0000 1039 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1039 N CHARTWELL CT 1307 09-30-151-011-0000 163 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 163 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1308 09-30-152-006-0000 166 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 166 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1309 09-30-153-002-0000 23 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 23 E CHURCHILL DR 1310 09-30-153-003-0000 29 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 29 E CHURCHILL DR 1311 09-30-153-004-0000 41 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 41 E CHURCHILL DR 1312 09-30-153-005-0000 51 E CHURCHIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 51 E CHURCHILL DR 1313 09-30-153-006-0000 989 N ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 989 N ENSIGN VISTA DR 1314 09-30-176-001-0000 1034 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1034 N CHARTWELL CT 1315 09-30-176-002-0000 1026 N CHARTWEL CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1026 N CHARTWELL CT 1316 09-30-176-003-0000 209 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 209 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1317 09-30-176-004-0000 219 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 219 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1318 09-30-176-006-0000 229 E ENSIGN VIS DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 229 E ENSIGN VISTA DR 1319 09-30-201-006-0000 1012 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1012 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1320 09-30-201-007-0000 1000 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1000 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1321 09-30-201-009-0000 1104 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1104 N OAK FOREST RD 1322 09-30-201-017-0000 352 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 352 E CANYON OAKS WY 1323 09-30-201-019-0000 1212 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1212 N CANYON OAKS WY 1324 09-30-201-021-0000 1080 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1080 N OAK FOREST RD 1325 09-30-201-022-0000 1066 N OAK FORES RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1066 N OAK FOREST RD 1326 09-30-201-027-0000 1302 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1302 N CANYON OAKS WY 1327 09-30-201-028-0000 1250 N CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1250 N CANYON OAKS WY 1328 09-30-201-029-0000 1038 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1038 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1329 09-30-201-030-0000 1024 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1024 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1330 09-30-202-004-0000 355 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 355 E CANYON OAKS WY 1331 09-30-202-005-0000 377 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 377 E CANYON OAKS WY 1332 09-30-202-006-0000 409 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 409 E CANYON OAKS WY 1333 09-30-202-007-0000 369 E CANYON O WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 369 E CANYON OAKS WY 1334 09-30-301-009-0000 125 E DORCHEST DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 147 E NORTHSANDRUN RD 1335 09-30-301-012-0000 155 E NORTH SAN RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 155 E NORTHSANDRUN RD 1336 09-30-330-001-0000 970 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 970 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1337 09-30-330-002-0000 960 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 960 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1338 09-30-330-003-0000 946 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 946 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1339 09-30-330-004-0000 934 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 934 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1340 09-30-330-005-0000 922 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 922 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1341 09-30-330-006-0000 906 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 906 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1342 09-30-330-007-0000 900 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1343 09-30-330-008-0000 890 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 890 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1344 09-30-330-009-0000 878 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 878 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1345 09-30-330-010-0000 866 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 866 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1346 09-30-330-011-0000 856 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 856 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1347 09-30-330-012-0000 846 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 846 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1348 09-30-376-001-0000 836 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 836 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1349 09-30-376-002-0000 828 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 828 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1350 09-30-376-003-0000 820 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 820 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1351 09-30-376-004-0000 804 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 804 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1352 09-30-376-005-0000 790 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 790 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1353 09-30-376-006-0000 776 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 776 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1354 09-30-376-007-0000 762 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 762 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1355 09-30-376-008-0000 748 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 748 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD #A 1356 09-30-376-009-0000 736 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 736 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1357 09-30-376-010-0000 724 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 724 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1358 09-30-376-011-0000 710 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 710 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1359 09-30-376-012-0000 704 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 704 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1360 09-30-376-013-0000 698 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 698 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1361 09-30-376-020-0000 690 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1362 09-30-401-001-0000 988 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 988 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1363 09-31-126-002-0000 676 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 676 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1364 09-31-126-003-0000 672 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 672 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1365 09-31-126-004-0000 668 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1366 09-31-126-005-0000 664 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 664 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1367 09-31-126-006-0000 660 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 660 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1368 09-31-126-007-0000 656 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 656 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1369 09-31-126-008-0000 648 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 648 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1370 09-31-126-010-0000 684 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 684 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1371 09-31-126-011-0000 680 N EAST CAPIT BLVD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 680 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD 1372 16-14-400-002-0000 3017 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1833 S LAKELINE DR 1373 16-14-400-011-0000 3029 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3029 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1374 16-14-400-012-0000 3051 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3051 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1375 16-14-400-013-0000 3069 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3069 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1376 16-14-400-014-0000 3081 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3081 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1377 16-14-400-015-0000 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR 1378 16-14-400-016-0000 1879 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR 1379 16-14-400-017-0000 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 1873 S CARRIGAN CIR 1380 16-14-400-018-0000 3113 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1381 16-14-400-019-0000 3145 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3145 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1382 16-14-400-020-0000 3169 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3169 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1383 16-14-400-021-0000 3183 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3183 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1384 16-14-400-022-0000 3188 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3188 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1385 16-14-400-023-0000 3012 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3012 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1386 16-14-400-024-0000 3020 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3020 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1387 16-14-400-025-0000 3076 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3076 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1388 16-14-400-026-0000 3100 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3100 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1389 16-14-400-027-0000 3116 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3116 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1390 16-14-400-028-0000 3138 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3138 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1391 16-14-400-029-0000 3156 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3156 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1392 16-14-400-030-0000 3176 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3176 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1393 16-14-400-033-0000 3002 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3002 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1394 16-14-400-036-0000 2055 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2055 S LAKELINE DR 1395 16-14-400-040-0000 2093 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2093 S LAKELINE DR 1396 16-14-400-041-0000 2081 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2081 S LAKELINE DR 1397 16-14-400-042-0000 2083 S LAKELINE DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2081 S LAKELINE DR 1398 16-14-400-043-4002 2992 E CARRIGAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2990 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR 1399 16-23-133-001-0000 2161 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2161 S LAKELINE DR 1400 16-23-133-002-0000 2167 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2167 S LAKELINE DR 1401 16-23-133-003-0000 2191 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2191 S LAKELINE CIR 1402 16-23-133-004-0000 2215 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2215 S LAKELINE CIR 1403 16-23-133-005-0000 2225 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2225 S LAKELINE CIR 1404 16-23-133-008-0000 2253 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2253 S LAKELINE CIR 1405 16-23-133-009-0000 2277 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2277 S BENCHMARK CIR 1406 16-23-133-010-0000 2285 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2285 S BENCHMARK CIR 1407 16-23-133-011-0000 2293 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2293 S BENCHMARK CIR 1408 16-23-133-012-0000 2301 S BENCHMAR CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2301 S BENCHMARK CIR 1409 16-23-133-013-0000 2957 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2957 E BENCHMARK DR 1410 16-23-133-014-0000 2233 S LAKELINE CIR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2233 S LAKELINE CIR 1411 16-23-201-001-0000 2111 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2111 S LAKELINE DR 1412 16-23-201-002-0000 2119 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2119 S LAKELINE DR 1413 16-23-201-003-0000 2127 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2127 S LAKELINE DR 1414 16-23-201-004-0000 2133 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2133 S LAKELINE DR 1415 16-23-201-005-0000 2141 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2141 S LAKELINE DR 1416 16-23-201-006-0000 2147 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2147 S LAKELINE DR 1417 16-23-201-018-0000 2155 S LAKELINE DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2155 S LAKELINE DR 1418 16-23-251-002-0000 2975 E BENCHMAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2975 E BENCHMARK DR 1419 16-23-251-004-0000 2379 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2379 S CANNON POINT DR 1420 16-23-251-005-0000 2383 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2383 S CANNON POINT DR 1421 16-23-251-007-0000 2401 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2401 S CANNON POINT DR 1422 16-23-251-009-0000 2421 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2421 S CANNON POINT DR 1423 16-23-251-011-0000 2427 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2427 S CANNON POINT DR 1424 16-23-251-013-0000 2441 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2441 S CANNON POINT DR 1425 16-23-251-014-0000 2484 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2484 S CANNON POINT DR 1426 16-23-251-015-0000 2485 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2485 S CANNON POINT DR 1427 16-23-251-016-0000 2519 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2519 S CANNON POINT DR 1428 16-23-251-017-0000 2555 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3041 E CANNON POINT DR 1429 16-23-251-019-0000 2579 S CANNON P DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3063 E CANNON POINT DR 1430 16-23-251-020-0000 2587 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3074 E CANNON POINT DR 1431 16-23-251-021-0000 2588 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3070 E CANNON POINT DR 1432 16-23-251-022-0000 2598 S CANNON P DR NFF Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 3072 E CANNON POINT DR 1433 16-23-328-006-0000 2452 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2452 S SCENIC DR 1434 16-23-328-007-0000 2464 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2464 S SCENIC DR 1435 16-23-328-008-0000 2478 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2478 S SCENIC DR 1436 16-23-328-009-0000 2486 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2486 S SCENIC DR 1437 16-23-328-010-0000 2498 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2498 S SCENIC DR 1438 16-23-328-011-0000 2510 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2510 S SCENIC DR 1439 16-23-328-012-0000 2522 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2522 S SCENIC DR 1440 16-23-328-020-0000 2558 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2558 S SCENIC DR 1441 16-23-328-021-0000 2534 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2534 S SCENIC DR 1442 16-23-328-022-0000 2546 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2546 S SCENIC DR 1443 16-23-451-002-0000 2583 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2583 S SCENIC DR 1444 16-23-451-003-0000 2584 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2584 S SCENIC DR 1445 16-23-451-004-0000 2572 S SCENIC DR Salt Lake C UT 84109 Salt Lake 2572 S SCENIC DR 1446 16-11-201-002-0000 3052 E EMIGRATIO RD Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 1447 16-11-262-003-0000 3044 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3044 E KENNEDY DR 1448 16-11-262-004-0000 3054 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3054 E KENNEDY DR 1449 16-11-262-005-0000 3052 E EMIGRATIO RD NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3150 EMIGRATION CANYON RD 1450 16-11-262-006-0000 3100 E KENNEDY DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3100 E KENNEDY DR 1451 16-11-262-007-0000 3094 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3094 E KENNEDY DR 1452 16-11-262-008-0000 3084 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3084 E KENNEDY DR 1453 16-11-262-009-0000 3080 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3080 E KENNEDY DR 1454 16-11-262-010-0000 3070 E KENNEDY DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3070 E KENNEDY DR 1455 16-11-262-011-0000 3100 E KENNEDY DR NFF2 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3130 E KENNEDY DR 1456 16-11-383-001-0000 2942 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2942 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1457 16-11-383-002-0000 1369 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1458 16-11-383-003-0000 1379 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1379 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1459 16-11-402-004-0000 3021 E CHAUCER PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E CHAUCER PL 1460 16-11-403-004-0000 3020 E CHAUCER PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E CHAUCER PL 1461 16-11-403-008-0000 3025 E DICKENS PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3025 E DICKENS PL 1462 16-11-404-004-0000 3020 E DICKENS PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E DICKENS PL 1463 16-11-404-008-0000 3021 E SHAKESPEA PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E SHAKESPEARE PL 1464 16-11-405-004-0000 3020 E SHAKESPEA PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E SHAKESPEARE PL 1465 16-11-405-008-0000 3021 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3021 E THACKERAY PL 1466 16-11-406-008-0000 3014 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3014 E THACKERAY PL 1467 16-11-406-009-0000 3020 E THACKERAY PL Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3020 E THACKERAY PL 1468 16-11-406-014-0000 3017 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3017 E ST MARYS CIR 1469 16-11-451-011-0000 3020 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3018 E ST MARYS CIR 1470 16-11-451-012-0000 3018 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3018 E ST MARYS CIR 1471 16-11-451-013-0000 3013 E SHERWOO DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3013 E SHERWOOD DR 1472 16-11-451-015-0000 3022 E ST MARYS CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3022 E ST MARYS CIR 1473 16-11-453-009-0000 2954 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2954 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1474 16-11-453-010-0000 2960 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2960 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1475 16-11-453-011-0000 2970 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2970 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1476 16-11-453-018-0000 2972 E DEVONSHI CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2972 E DEVONSHIRE CIR 1477 16-11-453-023-0000 3049 E SHERWOO CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3049 E SHERWOOD CIR 1478 16-11-453-024-0000 3060 E SHERWOO CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 3060 E SHERWOOD CIR 1479 16-14-129-001-0000 1399 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1399 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1480 16-14-129-002-0000 1409 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1409 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1481 16-14-129-003-0000 1423 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1423 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1482 16-14-129-004-0000 1437 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1437 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1483 16-14-129-005-0000 1449 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1449 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1484 16-14-129-006-0000 1467 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1467 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1485 16-14-129-007-0000 1479 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1479 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1486 16-14-129-008-0000 1497 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1497 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1487 16-14-129-009-0000 1505 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1505 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1488 16-14-129-010-0000 1519 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1519 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1489 16-14-129-011-0000 1529 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1529 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1490 16-14-129-013-0000 2919 E SUNSET CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2919 E SUNSET CIR 1491 16-14-178-002-0000 2916 E SUNSET CIR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 2916 E SUNSET CIR 1492 16-14-178-003-0000 1575 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1493 16-14-178-004-0000 1589 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1589 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1494 16-14-178-007-0000 1627 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1627 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1495 16-14-178-008-0000 1639 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1639 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1496 16-14-178-009-0000 1651 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1651 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1497 16-14-178-010-0000 1663 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1663 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1498 16-14-178-011-0000 1675 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1675 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1499 16-14-178-013-0000 1615 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1615 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1500 16-14-178-014-0000 1599 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1599 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1501 16-14-306-044-0000 1785 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1785 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1502 16-14-306-045-0000 1771 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1771 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1503 16-14-326-002-0000 1699 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1699 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1504 16-14-326-003-0000 1687 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1505 16-14-326-009-0000 1699 S DEVONSHI DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1699 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1506 16-14-326-010-0000 1705 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1705 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1507 16-14-326-011-0000 1711 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1711 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1508 16-14-326-012-0000 1725 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1725 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1509 16-14-326-013-0000 1739 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1739 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1510 16-14-326-014-0000 1755 S DEVONSHI DR Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 1755 S DEVONSHIRE DR 1511 09-28-351-001-0000 643 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 643 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1512 09-28-351-002-0000 625 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 625 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1513 09-28-351-003-0000 609 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 609 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1514 09-28-351-004-0000 587 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 587 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1515 09-28-352-001-0000 626 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1516 09-28-352-002-0000 1273 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1273 E TOMAHAWK DR 1517 09-28-352-003-0000 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR 1518 09-28-352-004-0000 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR 1519 09-28-352-005-0000 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR 1520 09-28-354-012-0000 690 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1521 09-28-354-015-0000 658 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 658 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1522 09-28-354-016-0000 644 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1523 09-28-354-021-0000 689 N NEW BONN PL Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 689 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL 1524 09-32-226-003-0000 1171 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1171 E CHANDLER DR 1525 09-32-226-004-0000 1181 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1181 E CHANDLER DR 1526 09-32-226-006-0000 1201 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1201 E CHANDLER DR 1527 09-32-226-007-0000 1225 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1225 E CHANDLER DR 1528 09-33-101-001-0000 573 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 573 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1529 09-33-101-006-0000 529 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 529 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1530 09-33-101-008-0000 1239 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1531 09-33-101-019-0000 537 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 537 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1532 09-33-101-020-0000 563 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1533 09-33-101-021-0000 555 N PERRYS HO RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 555 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD 1534 09-33-104-001-0000 1353 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1353 E TOMAHAWK DR 1535 09-33-104-002-0000 1367 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1367 E TOMAHAWK DR 1536 09-33-104-005-0000 1341 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1351 E TOMAHAWK DR 1537 09-33-104-006-0000 1335 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1351 E TOMAHAWK DR 1538 09-33-104-008-0000 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR 1539 09-33-126-002-0000 1435 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1435 E TOMAHAWK DR 1540 09-33-126-003-0000 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR 1541 09-33-126-004-0000 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR 1542 09-33-126-005-0000 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR 1543 09-33-126-006-0000 1475 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1475 E TOMAHAWK DR 1544 09-33-126-007-0000 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR 1545 09-33-126-008-0000 1499 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1499 E TOMAHAWK DR 1546 09-33-126-009-0000 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR 1547 09-33-126-010-0000 1517 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1517 E TOMAHAWK DR 1548 09-33-126-011-0000 1527 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1527 E TOMAHAWK DR 1549 09-33-126-012-0000 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR 1550 09-33-126-013-0000 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR 1551 09-33-126-015-0000 1407 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1407 E TOMAHAWK DR 1552 09-33-201-013-0000 1616 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1616 E TOMAHAWK DR 1553 09-33-202-002-0000 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR 1554 09-33-202-005-0000 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR 1555 09-33-202-006-0000 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR 1556 09-33-202-007-0000 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR 1557 09-33-202-008-0000 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR 1558 09-33-202-009-0000 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR 1559 09-33-202-015-0000 1547 E TOMAHAWK DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1547 E TOMAHAWK DR 1560 09-33-202-031-0000 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR NFF1 Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR 1561 09-33-251-005-0000 1627 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1627 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1562 09-33-251-010-0000 1628 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1628 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1563 09-33-251-011-0000 1632 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1632 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1564 09-33-251-012-0000 1648 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1648 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1565 09-33-251-013-0000 1672 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1566 09-33-251-014-0000 1684 E NEW BEDFO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1684 E NEW BEDFORD DR 1567 09-33-251-025-0000 1686 E CONNECTI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1686 E CONNECTICUT DR 1568 09-33-251-030-0000 1604 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1604 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1569 09-33-251-031-0000 1616 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1616 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1570 09-33-251-032-0000 1624 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1624 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1571 09-33-251-033-0000 1636 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1636 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1572 09-33-251-034-0000 1654 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1654 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1573 09-33-251-035-0000 1668 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1668 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1574 09-33-251-036-0000 1548 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1548 E HANOVER DR 1575 09-33-251-037-0000 1566 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1566 E HANOVER DR 1576 09-33-251-038-0000 1578 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1578 E HANOVER DR 1577 09-33-251-039-0000 1590 E HANOVER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1590 E HANOVER DR 1578 09-33-251-040-0000 1610 E FEDERAL P DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1610 E FEDERAL POINTE DR 1579 09-33-401-003-0000 333 N FEDERAL H CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 333 N FEDERAL HEIGHTS CIR 1580 09-33-403-003-0000 342 N FEDERAL H CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1581 09-33-403-008-0000 1691 E FEDERAL H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1691 E FEDERAL HEIGHTS DR 1582 09-33-403-013-0000 1771 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1771 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1583 09-33-403-014-0000 1785 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1785 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1584 09-33-403-015-0000 1793 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1793 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1585 09-33-403-016-0000 1803 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1803 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1586 09-33-403-017-0000 1813 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1813 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1587 09-33-403-018-0000 1814 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1814 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1588 09-33-403-021-0000 1757 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1757 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1589 09-33-403-022-0000 1765 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1765 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1590 09-33-404-011-0000 1804 E FORT DOUG CIR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1804 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR 1591 09-33-404-012-0000 2 N MEDICAL E DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1815 E NORTHCAMPUS DR 1592 09-29-176-001-0000 1027 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1027 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1593 09-29-176-002-0000 1036 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1036 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1594 09-29-301-007-0000 589 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 589 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1595 09-29-301-008-0000 623 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 623 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1596 09-29-301-010-0000 633 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1597 09-29-301-011-0000 919 N HILLTOP RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 919 N HILLTOP RD 1598 09-29-301-012-0000 915 N HILLTOP RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1599 09-29-326-003-0000 1013 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1013 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1600 09-29-326-004-0000 997 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 997 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1601 09-29-326-005-0000 845 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 845 E EDGEHILL RD 1602 09-29-326-006-0000 835 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 835 E EDGEHILL RD 1603 09-29-326-007-0000 823 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 823 E EDGEHILL RD 1604 09-29-326-008-0000 809 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 809 E EDGEHILL RD 1605 09-29-327-001-0000 657 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 657 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1606 09-29-327-002-0000 669 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 669 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1607 09-29-327-003-0000 681 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 681 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1608 09-29-327-004-0000 697 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 697 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1609 09-29-327-005-0000 711 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 711 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1610 09-29-327-006-0000 725 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 725 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1611 09-29-327-007-0000 760 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 760 E EDGEHILL RD 1612 09-29-327-008-0000 770 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 770 E EDGEHILL RD 1613 09-29-327-009-0000 784 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 784 E EDGEHILL RD 1614 09-29-327-010-0000 800 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 800 E EDGEHILL RD 1615 09-29-327-011-0000 810 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 810 E EDGEHILL RD 1616 09-29-327-012-0000 820 E EDGEHILL RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 820 E EDGEHILL RD 1617 09-29-327-017-0000 729 E 18TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 729 E EIGHTEENTH AVE 1618 09-29-328-001-0000 1008 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1008 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1619 09-29-328-003-0000 978 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 978 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1620 09-29-328-004-0000 968 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 968 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1621 09-29-328-011-0000 992 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 992 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1622 09-29-328-012-0000 1020 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1020 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1623 09-29-403-001-0000 958 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 958 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1624 09-29-403-002-0000 948 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 948 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1625 09-29-403-003-0000 938 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 938 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1626 09-29-403-004-0000 928 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 928 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1627 09-29-403-006-0000 900 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1628 09-29-403-009-0000 922 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 922 E NORTHVALE WY 1629 09-29-403-010-0000 910 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1630 09-29-403-014-0000 929 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 929 E NORTHVALE WY 1631 09-29-403-015-0000 933 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 936 E NORTHVALE WY 1632 09-29-403-016-0000 930 E NORTHVAL WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 930 E NORTHVALE WY 1633 09-29-403-017-0000 919 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1634 09-29-452-002-0000 999 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 999 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1635 09-29-452-003-0000 1003 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1636 09-29-452-006-0000 1005 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1637 09-29-452-009-0000 975 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 975 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1638 09-29-452-010-0000 987 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 987 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1639 09-29-452-012-0000 939 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 939 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1640 09-29-452-017-0000 1007 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1007 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1641 09-29-452-018-0000 1025 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1025 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1642 09-29-452-019-0000 1043 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1043 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1643 09-29-452-021-0000 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null>Salt Lake C UT 84108 Salt Lake 957 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1644 09-29-480-001-0000 1099 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1099 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1645 09-29-480-002-0000 1113 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1113 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1646 09-29-480-003-0000 1131 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1647 09-29-480-004-0000 1137 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1648 09-29-480-005-0000 747 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 747 N RICHLAND DR 1649 09-29-480-006-0000 1149 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1149 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1650 09-29-480-007-0000 1085 E NORTH BO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 1085 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR 1651 09-29-481-001-0000 742 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 742 N RICHLAND DR 1652 09-29-481-002-0000 732 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 732 N RICHLAND DR 1653 09-29-481-003-0000 720 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 720 N RICHLAND DR 1654 09-29-481-004-0000 710 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 710 N RICHLAND DR 1655 09-30-426-001-0000 447 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 447 E NORTHMONT WY 1656 09-30-426-002-0000 451 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 451 E NORTHMONT WY 1657 09-30-426-003-0000 455 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 455 E NORTHMONT WY 1658 09-30-426-004-0000 459 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 459 E NORTHMONT WY 1659 09-30-426-005-0000 469 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 469 E NORTHMONT WY 1660 09-30-426-006-0000 479 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 479 E NORTHMONT WY 1661 09-30-426-007-0000 489 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1662 09-30-426-008-0000 499 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 499 E NORTHMONT WY 1663 09-30-426-009-0000 509 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 509 E NORTHMONT WY 1664 09-30-426-010-0000 519 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 519 E NORTHMONT WY 1665 09-30-427-002-0000 555 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 555 E NORTHMONT WY 1666 09-30-427-003-0000 557 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 557 E NORTHMONT WY 1667 09-30-427-004-0000 561 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 561 E NORTHMONT WY 1668 09-30-427-005-0000 569 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 569 E NORTHMONT WY 1669 09-30-427-007-0000 529 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 529 E NORTHMONT WY 1670 09-30-427-008-0000 545 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 545 E NORTHMONT WY 1671 09-30-452-020-0000 849 N JUNIPERPO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR 1672 09-30-452-021-0000 847 N JUNIPERPO DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR 1673 09-30-452-027-0000 803 N GRANDRID DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 803 N GRANDRIDGE DR 1674 09-30-452-028-0000 805 N GRANDRID DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake <Null> 1675 09-30-452-035-0000 789 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 789 N NORTHPOINT DR 1676 09-30-452-036-0000 791 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 791 N NORTHPOINT DR 1677 09-30-452-043-0000 833 N GRANDRID DR 42D Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR 1678 09-30-452-044-0000 835 N GRANDRID CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 835 N GRANDRIDGE CT 1679 09-30-452-051-0000 837 N JUNIPERPO CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 837 N JUNIPERPOINT CT 1680 09-30-452-054-0000 798 N NORTHPOI DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 798 N NORTHPOINT DR 1681 09-30-454-017-0000 341 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 341 E CHARITY CV 1682 09-30-454-020-0000 344 E CHARITY CV Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 344 E CHARITY CV 1683 09-30-454-021-0000 343 E REDBRICK CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 343 E REDBRICK CT 1684 09-30-476-001-0000 445 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 445 E NORTHMONT WY 1685 09-30-476-003-0000 435 E NORTHMO WAY Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 435 E NORTHMONT WY 1686 09-30-476-004-0000 446 E NORTH HIL DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 446 E NORTHHILLS DR 1687 09-31-203-001-0000 257 E 11TH AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 257 E ELEVENTH AVE 1688 09-31-203-012-0000 346 E REDBRICK CT Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 346 E REDBRICK CT 1689 09-31-203-014-0000 315 E CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE 1690 09-31-203-015-0000 623 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1691 09-31-203-016-0000 615 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1692 09-31-203-030-0000 607 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1693 09-31-203-031-0000 589 N CAPITOL PA AVE Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 589 N CAPITOL PARK AVE 1694 09-31-203-032-0000 290 E PENNY PAR DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 290 E PENNY PARADE DR 1695 09-32-202-003-0000 693 N NORTHLAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 693 N NORTHLAND DR 1696 09-32-202-004-0000 677 N NORTHLAN DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 677 N NORTHLAND DR 1697 09-32-202-007-0000 661 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 661 N SADDLE HILL RD 1698 09-32-202-012-0000 624 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 624 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1699 09-32-202-013-0000 602 N TERRACE H DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 602 N TERRACE HILLS DR 1700 09-32-202-014-0000 925 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 925 E CHANDLER DR 1701 09-32-202-015-0000 949 E CHANDLER DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 949 E CHANDLER DR 1702 09-32-229-003-0000 674 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 674 N SADDLE HILL RD 1703 09-32-229-004-0000 686 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 686 N SADDLE HILL RD 1704 09-32-229-007-0000 690 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 690 N RICHLAND DR 1705 09-32-229-008-0000 696 N RICHLAND DR Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 696 N RICHLAND DR 1706 09-32-229-012-0000 650 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 650 N SADDLE HILL RD 1707 09-32-229-013-0000 662 N SADDLE HI RD Salt Lake C UT 84103 Salt Lake 662 N SADDLE HILL RD This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Chronology June 17, 2025 Petition Initiated by Mayor Mendenhall July 29, 2025 Map provided by Fire Department to show which parcels would be subject to the proposed WUI Code. August 7, 2025 45-day Public Notice and Public Hearing notice (scheduled for September 24, 2025) mailed. August 20, 2025 Notice emailed to recognized organizations. September 3, 2025 Updated map provided by Fire Department September 11, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed (based on updated map) September 24, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing held This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00646 a text amendment to Titles 18 Buildings and Construction that would adopt the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Code, a state fire code that the city is required to adopt, along with a map that shows where the WUI Fire Code would apply. The proposed text amendment also amends Title 21A Zoning to give precedence to the adopted WUI Code where it conflicts with regulations found in Title 21A. The WUI Fire Code applies additional building code requirements for specified properties as indicated on the proposed map. The WUI code regulates certain building materials, construction requirements, building separation, and landscaping provisions in order to reduce the risk of fire. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com . All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Anthony Allred at 801-799-4162 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at anthony.allred@slc.gov The application details can be accessed at https://www.slc.gov/planning/2025/08/07/openhouse2025-00626/. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER STAFF REPORT PUBLICATION Regards, Pat and Teri Akers Salt Lake City, UT 84103 Norris, Nick From:Allred, Anthony Sent:Tuesday, September 16, 2025 4:00 PM To:Norris, Nick Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Re: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code FYI. I responded separately. T Tony Allred Division Chief Fire Prevenon Bureau Salt Lake City Fire Department o:801.799.4162 m:801.654.7416 hps://gcc02.safelinks.protecon.outlook.com/?url=hp%3A%2F%2Ffire.slc.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7CNick.Norris%40 slc.gov%7Ce22a74b6e8f24602d20c08ddf56c657c%7C9fa2c952dd504b06ba6a4b9bd7adda03%7C0%7C0%7C638936568 083961009%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkF OIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qrijmW7Z2xpkpsAr38Wqma7IBZz5X8nbtJmpe19iQLY%3D&r eserved=0 -----Original Message----- From: Carleton DeTar Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 2:56 PM To: Allred, Anthony <anthony.allred@slc.gov> Cc: Carleton DeTar Subject: (EXTERNAL) Re: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Code Cauon: This is an external email. Please be cauous when clicking links or opening aachments. Dear Chief Allred, We support adopng the WUI code to encourage migang measures to protect homes on the edge of the city and to establish an orderly process for insurance companies to assess risks. Our main concern is with the proposed implementaon, as presented at the Greater Avenues City Council meeng earlier this month. It appeared from the maps that the properes designated as highest risk were only those that are immediately adjacent to wild land. So, for example, in our neighborhood, only parcels on Edgehill Rd were marked red. Why such a narrow designaon? Embers from wildfire could carry some distance into the city. Isn't there by new some fairly extensive experience from California fires to determine a more realisc high risk zone. We say this, because when more homes are included, the risk can be spread more broadly. It would be unfair to saddle a few homeowners with the burden of paying extra high insurance premiums to cover the risks of a wider swath of homes. I should menon that our home just missed being in the red zone, so we are arguing against ourselves. But our neighbors are concerned enough that some are considering selling their homes before they get the bad news from their insurance companies. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Carleton DeTar It is also of great concern as to why this “assessment” would only be applied to those residents who have the misfortune to live in the designated WUI area and not to all residents of Salt Lake City. The benefits of the program will extend to all residents of Salt Lake City and therefore all residents should be bearing the costs of this program. Additionally, this taxation-assessment places and unfair burden on these homeowners and I feel, would be more appropriately a shared cost across all homeowners in Salt Lake City. To me, this is similar to the cost sharing that has been implemented in Florida to help cover costs related to hurricanes and flooding in that state and similar to what is happening in California and other states relating to fires and related insurance and disaster coverages in those areas. There are currently no established criteria or standards for evaluating the WUI properties as mandated by 65A-8- 402(1)(a). The adoption of the ordinance prior to defining the criteria for the “triage” and implementation criteria is premature. My wife and I are concerned about the lack of criteria for evaluation, the possibility of an assessment of only the residents living in the WUI and that assessment not being spread across all residents of Salt Lake City and a profound lack of implementation guidelines concerning the program dictated by H.B.48. Please contact us if you have questions and thank you for your time. Regards. Judy A. Daly Joel L. Deaton Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 Norris, Nick From:Allred, Anthony Sent:Wednesday, September 17, 2025 2:17 PM To:Norris, Nick Subject:FW: (EXTERNAL) Proposed Amendment to the City fire Code FYI. I responded to his quesons separately. Best. Tony Allred Division Chief Fire Prevenon Bureau Salt Lake City Fire Department o:801.799.4162 m:801.654.7416 hps://gcc02.safelinks.protecon.outlook.com/?url=hp%3A%2F%2Ffire.slc.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7CNick.Norris%40 slc.gov%7C085fc6585c8e48e622f108ddf62730fd%7C9fa2c952dd504b06ba6a4b9bd7adda03%7C0%7C0%7C6389373703 61163272%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOI joiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=boGY655QK0KaNYSl6JZPsY9c%2BQqSGwdNGmhE1HnyztA%3D &reserved=0 -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Havlik Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2025 12:36 PM To: Allred, Anthony <anthony.allred@slc.gov> Subject: (EXTERNAL) Proposed Amendment to the City fire Code Cauon: This is an external email. Please be cauous when clicking links or opening aachments. Dear Mr. Allred, I live in the Avenues and am wring with concerns about the proposed amendment to the City Fire Code, specifically as it regards the WUI areas such as we have in the Avenues. I’m very concerned about fire risk and prevenon, but we need to give careful thought to what we do and how we regulate this. I live in the Wildland Urban Interface area. My understanding is that adopon of the proposed ordinance is mandated by H.B. 48. I support efforts to reduce the risk of wildland fires in Salt Lake City to dwellings. However, I have two concerns. 1) The types and amounts of fees that will be assessed to those living or owning property in the WUI haven’t been determined or announced. I have concerns that the mandate to collect an annual fee from owners of properes located within the wildland urban interface (65A-8-402(2)(b)) could result in prohibive expenses. These funds are to be used “to pay for the costs associated with implementaon of this part. . . .” 65A-8-402(4). What will those costs be ? Are the fees from owners of property in the WUI the only funding source for implementaon ? The benefits of implemenng the Wildland Urban Interface Code extend to all residents of Salt Lake City, not just the homeowners located within the defined wildland urban interface. Accordingly, the cost of the program should be shared by all Salt Lake City residents, not just those who own homes within the interface. The cost of fire prevenon and fire fighng in all other areas of the city is shared by all residents, and the WUI shouldn’t be different. For several years I lived on 1700 East, then for several years I lived on Elizabeth Street. Neither of these residences was in the WUI. I wasn’t expected to pay for all the potenal costs of fire fighng at those addresses - those costs were shared by everyone in the city. In return, I helped pay for the cost of fire prevenon and fire fighng in all other areas of the city. Paying for fire related costs in the WUI should be similarly shared by all residents of the city. In a condominium complex like Northpoint, where I live, will fees be assessed to individual unit owners, or to the HOA as its own enty ? These things should be determined and understood before anything is implemented. In Florida, residents along the coasts are at risk for damage from hurricanes. When owners can’t get or afford insurance, the state has become the insurer of last resort. The cost of that insurance isn’t born just by the cizens living along the coast, instead it is shared by everyone in the state. We should have the same approach here when it comes to fire associated risks and costs. 2) The standards for evaluang wildland urban interface property as mandated by 65A-8-402(1)(a) are not established. Adopng the ordinance in advance of defining the criteria to be used in the “triage scale” , and how individual risk will be determined and defined, is premature. These things should be decided and announced before the amendment is adopted and enacted. 3) There seems to be inconsistency about how fire risk is currently determined and this amendment doesn’t seem to clear that up. ffThe City has their map of fire risk. The state also has a wild fire risk calculator and map, and the two diff significantly. I live at the top of F Street in Northpoint Estates Condominium. Our homes are close to and somemes abung City Creek Canyon, and we are clearly at risk for fire and should do what we can to lower this risk. A stone’s throw away is a new development which Ivory Homes is building and which logically should be at the same risk as our HOA - yet your map doesn’t show them as being at increased risk. The state’s risk calculator tool shows my residence to be at moderate fire risk, yet as near as I can tell the City map places me at high risk. I have friends who live in the St. Mary’s neighborhood. The state’s fire risk tool places their home at high risk for wildfire, yet the City’s map says they are not at any increased risk. Thank you for your consideraon of these issues. Kevin Havlik Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 program should be borne by all Salt Lake City residents, not just those who own homes within this Interface. Second, the standards for evaluating Wildland Urban Interface property as mandated by 65A-8-402(1)(a) are not established. Adopting and subsequently enforcing the ordinance in advance of defining the criteria to be used in the “triage scale” is premature. Such criteria must be clear, unambiguous and understandable. Thank you in advance for consideration of my concerns. Sent from my iPhone look like. We would like to see descriptive information about this posted if applicable so that we can determine if there are specific actions we must take to become compliant with the Code if it is adopted. Thank you. Scott Narus - Higher construction expenses discourage renovation and new homebuilding, deepening the local housing shortage. # 2. One-Size-Fits-All Regulations - The code draws rigid boundaries that ignore variations in topography, prevailing winds, and existing defensible-space efforts. - Communities that have proactively managed vegetation and maintained local firebreaks will be penalized at the same rate as higher-risk areas. # 3. Threat to Housing Affordability and Equity - By driving up building costs, the WUI code disproportionately impacts first-time buyers, service workers, and lower-income families. - Redlining entire neighborhoods as “high-risk” can depress property values and limit our city’s capacity to attract new residents. - Equitable fire safety should balance risk reduction with affordable-housing goals. # 4. Insufficient Public Engagement - The public comment period has been poorly advertised, and town-hall presentations use technical jargon that confuses lay audiences. - A genuine dialogue—complete with visual risk maps and case studies—would build trust and yield better outcomes. # 5. Alternative, Community-Driven Approaches - Offer sliding-scale grants or 0% interest loans to help homeowners make voluntary upgrades. - Coordinate with local fire districts to fund targeted fuel-reduction projects in the highest- risk zones. I respectfully ask the Council to pause adoption of the WUI fire code and pursue a more balanced, locally tailored strategy, with existing grant programs in place prior to adopting any changes. Let’s combine sound science, community input, and targeted incentives rather than prescriptive mandates that penalize responsible residents. Thank you for your careful consideration. Jim Westover SLC resident This page has intentionally been left blank 5. Mailing List PARCEL_PIN OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP OWN_ZIP_FOUR 1.61633E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.60925E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.60933E+13 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>2209 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1118 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>3133 S 2700 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 2822 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>1381 E PARKWAY AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 3139 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62345E+13 <Null>53 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1006 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1985 9.33426E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.33476E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.343E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 8.25404E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.62325E+13 <Null>4775 S MILE HIGH DR MILLCREEK UT 84124 4728 1.62325E+13 <Null>2209 S DALLIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1118 1.62325E+13 <Null>3381 E JOYCE DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 4205 1.62325E+13 <Null>6603 S OLD MILL CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6919 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>170 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1602 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>1947 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1323 1.62325E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62325E+13 <Null>787 E AMARA PL MILLCREEK UT 84106 4555 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62325E+13 <Null>451 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3102 1.62345E+13 <Null>124 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1909 1.62345E+13 <Null>1986 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3131 1.62345E+13 <Null>53 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1006 9.33101E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.33403E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.30426E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 9.30452E+12 <Null><Null><Null><Null><Null><Null> 1.61631E+13 1324-1326 DOWNINGTON AVE, A SERIES OF LORD RP LLC LORD RP LLC 8813 S BLUEJAY CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6155 1.61633E+13 1578 GLEN ARBOR, LLC ARBOR, LLC 651 N COLUMBUS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2118 1.61618E+13 1700 SOUTH, LLC SOUTH, LLC 1753 E CORNELL CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1801 9.19452E+12 5W LAND INVESTMENTS, LLC TMENTS, LLC PO BOX 478 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 478 8.25278E+12 60 W CRAGS CT LLC RAGS CT LLC 68 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 1506 9.30376E+12 73 EMPIRE DG, LLC IRE DG, LLC 600 N EASTCAPITOL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2107 8.25276E+12 A FAM LIV TR FAM LIV TR 7 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 8.23427E+12 A&L INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 1630 N BECK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 1215 9.30476E+12 AARON DAVID KING; STEPHANIE KING (JT) E KING (JT)446 E NORTHHILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3334 1.61438E+13 ADAM D AIRD; ALYSON N PAXMAN (JT) PAXMAN (JT)2811 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.62313E+13 ADAM J NORRIS; HEATHER A NORRIS (JT) NORRIS (JT)2191 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 9.30202E+12 ADH PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 3465 N PINES WY STE 104 WILSON WY 83014 9129 1.62333E+13 ADRIANNE B LEE; SHAWN LEE (JT) WN LEE (JT)2495 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 1.61633E+13 AGENTIA J THOMAS; DEAN E THOMAS (JT) THOMAS (JT)1580 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.6232E+13 ALAN & ORLENE COHEN LIVING TRUST 05/19/2022 05/19/2022 2133 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.30452E+12 ALAN & PAMELA LAKOMSKI TRUST 08/05/2013 08/05/2013 833 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3306 9.30452E+12 ALAN B HAYES & SUSAN E MACNAMARA REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 04/16/202 803 N GRANDRIDGE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3306 9.29326E+12 ALEXANDER F MITKUS; KATHY-ANNE MIKLOSSY (JT) KLOSSY (JT)845 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.33101E+12 ALEXANDER H BOCOCK ER H BOCOCK 563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.33101E+12 ALEXANDER H BOCOCK; AMY E SULLIVAN (JT) LLIVAN (JT)563 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30376E+12 ALEXANDER KRAVETS; VICTORIA TAILLAC (JT) AILLAC (JT)828 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.29452E+12 ALEXANDER LORENZO COLONNA & SARAH VIOLET COLONNA REVOCABLE LIVING 939 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61635E+13 ALEXANDRA BENNING; JUERGEN BENNING (JT) ENNING (JT)1341 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61145E+13 ALI AKBAR MATINKHAH; ROYA KHOSRAVIPOUR (JT) VIPOUR (JT)2972 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.61635E+13 ALISON LITTLEFIELD; RYAN LITTLEFIELD (JT) EFIELD (JT)1375 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61435E+13 ALLAN HARTMAN; ALLISON HARTMAN (JT) ARTMAN (JT)1969 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.60933E+13 ALLEN LIVING TRUST 03/08/2021 03/08/2021 1615 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.61618E+13 ALLISON J GURSKEY N J GURSKEY 1431 S BEACON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2402 1.61418E+13 ALLISON YOUNG LISON YOUNG 1675 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61743E+13 AMANDA JOY BISCHOFF; JON E BISCHOFF; SARAH ANNE BISCHOFF (JT) SCH 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 9.31203E+12 AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.31203E+12 AMD & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST OF THE DAVID PARKINSON TRUST 607 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 1.61126E+13 AMERICAN TEL & TEL COMPANY TEL COMPANY 1010 PINE ST #6E-L-01 ST LOUIS MO 63101 2015 1.61743E+13 AMY E FLORANCE LIVING TRUST 08/31/2011 08/31/2011 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 1.62333E+13 AMY K BAHNA REVOCABLE TRUST 04/11/2023 04/11/2023 2477 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 1.6114E+13 ANDERS KIERULF; SARA A RICH (JT) A RICH (JT)3021 E CHAUCER PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2503 1.60925E+13 ANDRE G MARTINEZ G MARTINEZ 1757 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 1.61435E+13 ANDREW & KAREN LEITCH LIVING TURST 06/11/2003 06/11/2003 2076 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 9.29403E+12 ANDREW L WAKEFIELD; TARA F WAKEFIELD (JT) EFIELD (JT)568 N I ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3223 1.61618E+13 ANDREW LEIGH FREEMAN; MEGHAN BOYD (JT) N BOYD (JT)1583 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.30426E+12 ANDREW WAKEFIELD REVOCABLE TRUST 12/02/2016 12/02/2016 447 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30427E+12 ANNA GANNET HALLAR; IAN MCCUBBIN (JT) CUBBIN (JT)555 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61743E+13 ANTHONY GODFREY LIVING TRUST 05/03/2024; MALGORZATA S MICHALOWICZ 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 9.29326E+12 ARCHIBALD-NAVAS FAMILY TRUST 02/04/2013 02/04/2013 1013 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4029 9.31126E+12 ARTHUR E GRIFFIN & MARGO A MARKOWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/24/2015 06/2 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 9.31126E+12 ARTHUR E GRIFFIN & MARGO A MARKOWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/24/2015 06/2 668 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.6033E+13 ARUP LABORATORIES INC ATORIES INC 500 S CHIPETA WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1221 1.61145E+13 ASHOK & XUEJUAN LIN TUTEJA TRUST 03/25/2015 03/25/2015 2954 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.6033E+13 ASSOCIATED REGIONAL AND UNIVERSITY PATHOLOGISTS INC LOGISTS INC 500 S CHIPETA WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1221 9.33126E+12 ATHANASIOS P SEVASTOPOULOS VASTOPOULOS 1425 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.62313E+13 AXXON INVESTMENT COMPANY, LC COMPANY, LC 2155 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.29327E+12 B&D PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 784 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.61631E+13 B&DN2013LT B&DN2013LT 128 S CRESTLINE DR ST GEORGE UT 84790 1123 9.30201E+12 BABCOOK KEETON LIVING TRUST 12/02/2019 12/02/2019 1000 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 1.60925E+13 BARTON LYNN ROBISON; KIMBERLY ANN ROBISON (JT) OBISON (JT)867 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 1.60933E+13 BECKIE WINSTON; PHILLIP H WINSTON (TC) INSTON (TC)1589 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 9.29326E+12 BENJAMIN LANOHA; ALEXIS FREED (JT) FREED (JT)835 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.33251E+12 BENNETT JOINT FAMILY TRUST 11/05/2019 11/05/2019 1686 E CONNECTICUT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4203 1.62318E+13 BERG REVOCABLE TRUST 08/03/2024 08/03/2024 2387 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 1.61633E+13 BERNHARD FASSI; ALLISON JO JUDKINS (JT) UDKINS (JT)1584 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61145E+13 BETTY B CLARK TTY B CLARK 3013 E SHERWOOD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2544 1.61633E+13 BETTY H JEPSON TRUST 9/10/2013 T 9/10/2013 8564 S MARDI GRAS LN WEST JORDAN UT 84088 2762 1.6144E+13 BEVERLIN FAMILY TRUST 08/22/2024 08/22/2024 3183 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.3033E+12 BEVERLY G HARRIE REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 8/27/2013 D 8/27/2013 866 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.2948E+12 BFT BFT 747 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4006 1.61635E+13 BHARADWAJ KADIYALA; VINILA SISTA (JT) SISTA (JT)1392 W 12115 S RIVERTON UT 84065 7425 9.30202E+12 BHUPENDRA PATEL; ANNE KENNEDY (JT) ENNEDY (JT)377 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2252 1.61635E+13 BITTLE FAMILY TRUST 11/01/2023 11/01/2023 1343 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 BLAINE EAST BLAINE EAST 1990 N 4000 W DAYTON ID 83232 1.61633E+13 BLAINE PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3440 S 3650 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3250 1.61633E+13 BLAINE WEST BLAINE WEST 1990 N 4000 W DAYTON ID 83232 1.62318E+13 BLANKEVOORT FAMILY TRUST 11/05/2018 11/05/2018 PO BOX 58643 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 643 8.25428E+12 BOBBY JO ROETZEL; CHARLENE ROETZEL ENE ROETZEL 22 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 1.61145E+13 BOWEN FAMILY TRUST 01/07/2020 01/07/2020 2960 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 9.3033E+12 BRAD AND CONNIE POSS LIVING TRUST 06/19/2023 06/19/2023 890 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.60926E+13 BRADLEY G FISHER; KIM R FISHER (JT) FISHER (JT)916 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.19451E+12 BRADLEY S SCOTT LEY S SCOTT 403 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 8.25126E+12 BRANDON BICKMORE ON BICKMORE 10 S DAWN HILL SANDY UT 84092 4901 1.61635E+13 BRANDON PARRY ANDON PARRY 11918 S JENSON FARM CV DRAPER UT 84020 9.30153E+12 BRIAN A SIMPSON; RACHEL G SIMPSON (JT) IMPSON (JT)23 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.29327E+12 BRIAN CHAN; PRIYA CHAN (JT) A CHAN (JT)669 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61633E+13 BRIAN D FAY BRIAN D FAY 1562 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.62333E+13 BRIAN LINGLE; HEIDI LINGLE (JT) LINGLE (JT)2522 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61621E+13 BRIDGE JONES FAMILY TRUST 09/21/2023 09/21/2023 1741 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61618E+13 BRITTA RETZLAFF BRENNAN AFF BRENNAN 1609 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61618E+13 BRITTA RETZLAFF BRENNAN AFF BRENNAN 1609 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61618E+13 BROKEDOWN PALACE LEGACY TRUST 02/23/2024 02/23/2024 1611 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61636E+13 BRUCE & TONYA SLOAN TRUST 09/30/2003 09/30/2003 1413 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61631E+13 BRUCE B GREEN FAMILY TRUST 08/21/2015 08/21/2015 1334 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 8.25278E+12 BRUCE O PALENSKE; MIKE A TOMPKINS (JT) MPKINS (JT)1076 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2250 9.29327E+12 BRUNS FAMILY TRUST DATED 11/26/2024 11/26/2024 725 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 9.29481E+12 BWL 2006 TR BWL 2006 TR 732 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 9.29328E+12 C FAM TR C FAM TR 978 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33104E+12 CAB REV TR CAB REV TR PO BOX 58007 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 7 1.61435E+13 CARA S DZIUDA; GEOFFREY JOSEPH DZIUDA (JT) DZIUDA (JT)1955 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61618E+13 CARDINAL PROPERTY LLC ROPERTY LLC 2551 N GREEN VALLEY PKWY HENDERSON NV 89014 1.6144E+13 CARL S PETERSEN; PEGGY B PETERSEN (JT) TERSEN (JT)3051 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 9.30452E+12 CARLTON JAMES GROUP LLC S GROUP LLC PO BOX 1110 ATASCADERO CA 93423 9.29326E+12 CAROLINE K MILNE INE K MILNE 809 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 9.29326E+12 CAROLINE K MILNE INE K MILNE 809 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3726 1.60933E+13 CAROLYN HARLAN; ROBERT MARK HARLAN (JT) HARLAN (JT)1547 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61618E+13 CASSANDRA FERGUSON LIVING TRUST 07/17/2023 07/17/2023 1575 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 1.61631E+13 CATHERINE CATES; CATHRINE CATES IRREVOCABLE TRUST 08/28/2023 08/2 1414 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.30176E+12 CATHERINE CONNELLY-WARREN ELLY-WARREN 1026 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.33104E+12 CATHERINE COOK; JAN KUBANEK (JT) UBANEK (JT)1353 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 1.60925E+13 CATHERINE MAHER ROMERO; PEDRO ROMERO (JT) ROMERO (JT)1731 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 1.61435E+13 CATHY CHAMBLESS LIVING TRUST 11/23/1998 11/23/1998 1977 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 9.30203E+12 CHARLES B MUSGRAVE; LUANNE TSENG MUSGRAVE (JT) SGRAVE (JT)1302 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2246 9.33251E+12 CHARLES E MAGGELET TRUST 06/25/2003 06/25/2003 PO BOX 980790 PARK CITY UT 84098 701 9.31126E+12 CHERYL M MORI; CHRISTOPHER WARNER (JT) WARNER (JT)656 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 9.31126E+12 CHERYL MORI CHERYL MORI 660 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61631E+13 CHRIS L KLEKAS IS L KLEKAS 1422 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.30376E+12 CHRISTIANE FAURON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 02/24/2010 02/24/2010 820 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.61625E+13 CHRISTINE E WINSLOW TRUST 04/09/1997 04/09/1997 1725 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 9.31126E+12 CHRISTINE ELIZABETH MILLER LIVING TRUST 11/20/2017 11/20/2017 1979 S WASATCH DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3367 1.61618E+13 CHRISTOPHER BROCK OPHER BROCK 102 PASEO VIS SAN CLEMENTE CA 92673 8.25278E+12 CHRISTOPHER J LURAS; MELISSA K LURAS (JT) LURAS (JT)53 W CRAGS CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2251 1.61625E+13 CHRISTOPHER JAMES LEVIN; KATHERINE HUMPHRIES LEVIN (JT) LEVIN (JT 1739 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 9.28351E+12 CHRISTOPHER M HULL REVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT 03/31/2009; ERIN B H 587 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30426E+12 CHRISTOPHER R JOHNSON; KATHARINE A COLES (JT) COLES (JT)455 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 1.61438E+13 CID ENTERPRISES, LLC PRISES, LLC PO BOX 58089 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 89 8.25278E+12 CITIZEN HOUSE, LLC HOUSE, LLC 2782 W LOU JEAN ST TAYLORSVILLE UT 84129 2324 1.61618E+13 CJF TRUST CJF TRUST 1486 W 4950 S TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 4250 9.32229E+12 CLAIRE B STAMPFER REVOCABLE TRUST 08/03/2009 08/03/2009 662 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.28352E+12 CLARK W JOHNSON; BETHANY J PEARSON (JT) EARSON (JT)626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4246 9.28354E+12 CLARK W JOHNSON; BETHANY J PEARSON (JT) EARSON (JT)626 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4246 9.31126E+12 CLAUDE R & LAORAINE F BRANDT FAMILY TRUST 09/06/2007 09/06/2007 676 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61145E+13 CMT REV TRUST T REV TRUST 3022 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.6144E+13 COLIN P KING & WENDY KING FAMILY LIVING TRUST 04/19/2001 04/19/20 3176 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.30151E+12 CONSTANCE BENNETT DESHA REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 PO BOX 3594 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 3594 1.60926E+13 CONSTANCE L LIEBER LIVING TRUST 07/30/2014 07/30/2014 1455 S 1100 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2423 1.61631E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.30301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 1.61621E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9001 1.61631E+13 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.29301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 9.29301E+12 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC OF LDS F JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 1.60933E+13 CORP OF THE PB OF CH JC LDS F CH JC LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 22 1.6232E+13 CORY L MAYLETT; RHONDA H MAYLETT (JT) AYLETT (JT)2147 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.60926E+13 CRAIG L DEMORDAUNT; CHRISTINE R DEMORDAUNT (JT) RDAUNT (JT)932 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30452E+12 CRAIG N PACINI; JULIE M PACINI (JT) PACINI (JT)10454 S GOLDEN WILLOW DR SANDY UT 84070 4236 1.61633E+13 CRIMMEL-WEINBAUER REVOCABLE TRUST 10/05/2023 10/05/2023 1540 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 9.33101E+12 CRUM QUIGLEY FAMILY TRUST 09/05/2024 09/05/2024 537 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.30476E+12 CWF TRUST; JHF III TRUST F III TRUST 445 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.32226E+12 CYTOKAM TRUST 12/11/2019 12/11/2019 1201 E CHANDLER CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4237 9.29176E+12 CZ REV TRUST Z REV TRUST 1027 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4029 1.61625E+13 D STEVEN BREWSTER EN BREWSTER 1715 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 9.28352E+12 DAILEY WAGNER LIVING TRUST 12/15/2015 12/15/2015 1285 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.62313E+13 DALE RUTLEDGE; KARRI BURESH (JT) BURESH (JT)2301 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 9.29481E+12 DALE WACHOWIAK; AYAKO YAMAGUCHI (JT) AGUCHI (JT)720 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 1.61435E+13 DAMON SCOTT FETTERS; HONEY FAYE (JT) Y FAYE (JT)2090 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 1.6144E+13 DAN CARY; PAULETTA V CARY (JT) V CARY (JT)3138 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.60918E+13 DANIEL & LORI LOVE TRUST 06/23/2023 06/23/2023 953 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61618E+13 DANIEL L. SPECTOR; GWENDOLYN R. COOK (JT) . COOK (JT)2191 S MCCLELLAND ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 2396 9.30201E+12 DANIEL MCARTHUR COTTAM; JOCELYN ROSE XUCI COTTAM (JT) COTTAM (JT)1024 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 1.60918E+13 DARIN & GAIL PICCOLI TRUST 05/16/2017 05/16/2017 939 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25278E+12 DARREN DUNN; AMY DUNN (JT) Y DUNN (JT)1130 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 9.33251E+12 DASP REV TR DASP REV TR 1604 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 9.29403E+12 DAVE WILSON; SHAUNA EDSON (JT) EDSON (JT)948 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33202E+12 DAVID & BETHANY STEINBERG TRUST 06/22/2023 06/22/2023 1571 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 DAVID ANDERSON; GRETA ANDERSON (JT) DERSON (JT)1547 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.30427E+12 DAVID C CLASSEN; LAURIE HOFMANN (JT) OFMANN (JT)561 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61633E+13 DAVID C FAWSON; LINDA J FAWSON (JT) FAWSON (JT)1501 S 2300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2744 1.61633E+13 DAVID FAWSON AVID FAWSON 1501 S 2300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2744 1.61413E+13 DAVID H HUNTSMAN; MICHELLE R HUNTSMAN (JT) NTSMAN (JT)1399 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 1.62313E+13 DAVID KUO; SONYA SONG (JT) A SONG (JT)2233 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 9.28352E+12 DAVID L DEISLEY; JANET E DEISLEY (TC) EISLEY (TC)1273 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.61435E+13 DAVID M PLATT; AUTUMN N WEST (TC) N WEST (TC)1995 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61138E+13 DAVID S GRAY AVID S GRAY 1369 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 9.30426E+12 DAVID SELLER GOLDSMITH; KARA E DIORIO (JT) DIORIO (JT)499 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30151E+12 DAVID URMANN AVID URMANN 1040 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.30201E+12 DAVID W FREED FAMILY TRUST 09/26/2011 09/26/2011 1250 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2253 1.61743E+13 DAVID WILLIAM REICHERT AM REICHERT 1312 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 9.30376E+12 DDS TR DDS TR 736 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.32202E+12 DELORES ANN MERRELL TRUST 10/27/1992 10/27/1992 677 N NORTHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4053 1.61433E+13 DENNIS D REESE; MARY J REESE (JT) REESE (JT)1705 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 1.61635E+13 DEREK & KIMBERLY PAYNE TRUST 07/20/2018 07/20/2018 1369 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 9.3033E+12 DEREK MILLER; LAURA MILLER (JT) MILLER (JT)900 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.61413E+13 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE, LLC DRIVE, LLC 5138 S 4950 W HOOPER UT 84315 1.61418E+13 DEVONSHIRE FAMILY LLC FAMILY LLC 1368 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2563 8.25276E+12 DIANNA GIBSON ANNA GIBSON 2504 E COMMONWEALTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1310 1.60926E+13 DIEFFENBACHER-LAMMERS TRUST 03/11/2022 03/11/2022 986 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60926E+13 DIEFFENBACHER-LAMMERS TRUST 03/11/2022 03/11/2022 986 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.62333E+13 DIMITRIOS & ZOE TSAGARIS FAMILY TRUST 12/15/2017 12/15/2017 3815 S 2900 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3661 9.30452E+12 DJB LIV TRUST B LIV TRUST 791 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3358 1.61625E+13 DONALD A WARNER; KATHLEEN P WARNER (JT) WARNER (JT)1745 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61636E+13 DONALD K BLACKWELL K BLACKWELL PO BOX 504 WILSON WY 83014 8.25276E+12 DORCHESTER POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 3331 S 900 E # 130 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 2083 8.25278E+12 DORCHESTER POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 1558 1.60933E+13 DOUGLAS R CHADWICK; RANDY T WESTPAL (JT) ESTPAL (JT)1521 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 9.32202E+12 DOUGLAS WOSETH GLAS WOSETH 949 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4206 1.6232E+13 DOUNG & BRIGITTE LIRL FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/24/2021 05 2127 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 9.30176E+12 DRY DOG LLC DRY DOG LLC 15 SANDSTONE CV PARK CITY UT 84060 1.61625E+13 DUGGLEBY-GEROSO FAMILY TRUST 04/13/2018 04/13/2018 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 1.61625E+13 DUGGLEBY-GEROSO FAMILY TRUST 04/13/2018 04/13/2018 1650 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 1.61625E+13 EDWARD A HART; CLARA Y LIEU (JT) Y LIEU (JT)1735 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.6144E+13 EDWARD B FELT; DEBORAH B FELT (JT) B FELT (JT)3029 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 1.60933E+13 ELIZABETH A M JACKSON; DANIEL W JACKSON (JT) ACKSON (JT)440 E 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 3004 1.61631E+13 ELIZABETH ACADEMY ETH ACADEMY 2870 S CONNOR ST MILLCREEK UT 84109 1932 1.62333E+13 ELIZONDO FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 04/11/2018 04/11/2018 2510 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 9.30101E+12 EMERSON LLC EMERSON LLC 546 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4244 9.30101E+12 EMERSON LLC EMERSON LLC 546 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4244 1.60933E+13 EMILY B MCCORMICK; ADAM P MCCORMICK (JT) ORMICK (JT)1607 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60925E+13 EMMA ROTHKOPF; CONOR SCHLOSSER R SCHLOSSER 527 VISTA GLORIOSA DR LOS ANGELES CA 90065 1.61633E+13 EMMA THATCHER; LEVI THATCHER (JT) ATCHER (JT)1591 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3800 9.33126E+12 ERIK T BADGER; AMY K BADGER (JT) BADGER (JT)1407 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.61618E+13 ERIN F CUNNINGHAM; JASON T CUNNINGHAM (JT) INGHAM (JT)1637 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.61631E+13 EUGENE S & MEILAN BAIERSCHMIDT REVOCABLE TRUST 04/15/2025 04/15/2 1137 N CROWN KING AVE WASHINGTON UT 84780 2646 1.61633E+13 EVAN JOYCE EVAN JOYCE 825 E STATE ST BOISE ID 83712 9.29328E+12 EVAN MOORE & JOSHUA RHEA REVOCABLE TRUST 02/07/2018 02/07/2018 992 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.33251E+12 FEDERAL POINTE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION PO BOX 9375 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 375 9.19451E+12 FITZPATRICK FAMILY TRUST 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 349 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2245 1.61418E+13 FLORIAN SOLZBACHER REVOCABLE TRUST 04/05/2013 04/05/2013 1639 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61413E+13 FLYNN & MIMI JUSTICE LIVING TRUST 04/28/2022 04/28/2022 1437 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 9.31126E+12 FOSTER BOND FOSTER BOND 684 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61438E+13 FRANK J DELROSSI; YVONNE F; AN K DELROSSI (JT) LROSSI (JT)2799 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1444 1.61633E+13 FREDERICK E PEYTON CK E PEYTON 1514 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.61618E+13 FREDRICK C LINDBECK; SHAUNA LINDBECK (JT) NDBECK (JT)1593 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.33126E+12 FU/CHANG FAMILY TRUST 07/25/2012 07/25/2012 1465 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33403E+12 G FAM TR G FAM TR 1814 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4492 1.62318E+13 GABRIEL VANRENEN; MARIA LY VANRENEN (JT) NRENEN (JT)2962 E BENCHMARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1465 1.60925E+13 GARRETT BEECHER ETT BEECHER 851 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 8.25428E+12 GARY B NIEBOER; HEIDI M MCGUIRE-NIEBOER (JT) IEBOER (JT)885 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9.30201E+12 GAY ETTA HEMINGWAY REVOCABLE TRUST 7/16/2021 T 7/16/2021 1212 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2253 1.60933E+13 GEORGE & CATHLEEN KELNER FAMILY LIVING TRUST 06/03/2024 06/03/202 1000 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 9.30376E+12 GEORGE & JANICE NIXON SURVIVORS TRUST 03/24/2024 03/24/2024 836 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.32226E+12 GEORGE E FURGIS; SUSANNE GUSTIN-FURGIS (JT) FURGIS (JT)1181 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4238 9.32226E+12 GEORGE J PAYNE RGE J PAYNE 1171 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4238 9.28352E+12 GEORGE MICHAEL MASTAKAS EL MASTAKAS 1297 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4261 1.61633E+13 GIANNA HAMMER ANNA HAMMER 1623 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 8.25276E+12 GINA DALTON REVOCABLE TRUST 02/14/2003 02/14/2003 19 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.32202E+12 GLEN M SCHMIDT; MARIE SCHMIDT (JT) CHMIDT (JT)624 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4033 9.30201E+12 GM RV TRST GM RV TRST 1080 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 1.60926E+13 GMH REV TRUST; PAH REV TRUST H REV TRUST 935 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61631E+13 GOURLEY-SMITH TRUST 10/15/2015 10/15/2015 1416 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 8.25126E+12 GRANT TOWER, LLC TOWER, LLC 2055 E 3900 S # 100 MILLCREEK UT 84124 1766 1.61631E+13 GREG GUNN; J JEFFREY GUNN (JT) Y GUNN (JT)1411 S CANTERBURY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2830 1.60926E+13 GREGG LASSEN (JT) LASSEN (JT)1710 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1334 9.29481E+12 HAMID SHG GHANDEHARI; MITRA JAVDAN (JT) JAVDAN (JT)742 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 8.25428E+12 HANADI FARRUKH; IMAD FARRUKH (TC) ARRUKH (TC)5879 E PIONEER FORK RD EMIGRATN CYN UT 84108 1699 1.61145E+13 HANNAH DANIELS MARQUARDT LIVING TRUST 01/15/2016; DANIEL B MARQUA 2970 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.60926E+13 HANSEN LEGACY PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 2034 E LAIRD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1902 9.19476E+12 HARRIS H SIMMONS S H SIMMONS 475 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 1.60926E+13 HEATHER HOLMGREN; ALEX JONATHAN BELL (JT) N BELL (JT)954 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.33251E+12 HEATHER LOVELL; PAUL LOVELL (JT) LOVELL (JT)1616 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 9.2948E+12 HENRY E COBB TRUST 11/29/2016 11/29/2016 1085 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.61435E+13 HILARY A HEWES; BRENT T ROTONDI (JT) OTONDI (JT)1355 CHERRINGTON PKWY MOON TOWNSHIP PA 15108 1.61438E+13 HILLARY FRANDSEN; STEPHEN FRANDSEN (JT) ANDSEN (JT)PO BOX 2022 PARK CITY UT 84060 1.6232E+13 HM REV TRUST M REV TRUST PO BOX 58183 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 183 9.29481E+12 HOLLY J CARVETH; JOHN R CARVETH (JT) ARVETH (JT)710 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4000 9.31126E+12 HOLLY RYAN HOLLY RYAN 680 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2139 1.61743E+13 HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF SUGAR HOUSE CENTRAL PARK CONDOMINIUMS 2045 E WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1156 9.29403E+12 HOUGE REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST 11/08/2006 11/08/2006 928 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.61126E+13 HOWARD KENT INC RD KENT INC 450 E BURTON LN KAYSVILLE UT 84032 1.6144E+13 HUGH DANIEL CHACE; GISELLA MACIAS CHACE (JT) CHACE (JT)3156 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.6144E+13 HUISH PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 7511 GREENWOOD AVE N#325 SEATTLE WA 98103 1.6144E+13 HYRULE TRUST 02/22/2018 02/22/2018 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 9.33404E+12 I.J & JEANNE WAGNER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER NITY CENTER 1815 E NORTHCAMPUS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84112 9.30101E+12 IGOR BEST DEVEREUX; CYNTHIA CONNER BEST-DEVEREUX ST-DEVEREUX 1173 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 9.32229E+12 IMRAN ZUBIAR FAMILY TRUST 09/28/2023; DOROTHY ZUBAIR TRUST 12/13/650 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.33126E+12 IRENA R EDWARDS LIVING TRUST 8/6/2019 ST 8/6/2019 1539 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.193E+12 ITF TRUST 04/03/2023 04/03/2023 299 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2245 8.252E+12 JACK B PARSON COMPANIES N COMPANIES 2350 S 1900 W # 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 1.61438E+13 JACKIE M EDGCOMB; PAUL A EDGCOMB (JT) DGCOMB (JT)2831 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.6033E+13 JACOBSEN CONSTRUCTION ONSTRUCTION 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.6033E+13 JACOBSEN CONSTRUCTION CO TRUCTION CO 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.61618E+13 JAKE KIRSHNER; KATIE NICHOLLS (JT) CHOLLS (JT)1619 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 9.32229E+12 JAMES & DEBORAH ALTO TRUST 07/18/2019 07/18/2019 674 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 1.60926E+13 JAMES D WEBSTER; MARYANN S WEBSTER N S WEBSTER 938 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60933E+13 JAMES DOOLIN; NICHOLL R HEIEREN DOOLIN TRUST DATED 1813/2006 D 18 1627 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 9.29452E+12 JAMES HENSHAW; QUINETTE HENSHAW (JT) ENSHAW (JT)1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.29452E+12 JAMES HENSHAW; QUINETTE HENSHAW (JT) ENSHAW (JT)1003 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.6144E+13 JAMES K & PAMELA A WILFAHRT REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 4/20/2006 T 4/2081 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 1.6144E+13 JAMES K WILFAHRT; PAMELA A WILFAHRT (JT) LFAHRT (JT)2081 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 9.33126E+12 JAMES KENNEDY; SHARON KENNEDY (JT) ENNEDY (JT)1517 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.6144E+13 JAMES S HUNTER ES S HUNTER 3012 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 1.62333E+13 JAMES THOMAS COLLINS MAS COLLINS 2546 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61625E+13 JAMES WINSTON CRAGHEAD & DALE SHARON CRAGHEAD LIVING TRUST 11/7/2 1729 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 8.25278E+12 JARED L SIMON RED L SIMON 1063 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2229 1.6114E+13 JASON HUNZIKER; HOLLY C HUNZIKER (JT) NZIKER (JT)3020 E DICKENS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2505 9.32229E+12 JASON WIESE; ELIANE S WIESE (TC) WIESE (TC)686 N SADDLE HILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4044 9.30101E+12 JEFFREY J ROCCO REVOCABLE TRUST 4/29/2006; ALEXANDRA S ROCCO REVO 1101 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 1.61438E+13 JEFFREY P JOHNSON; CARLA JEAN JOHNSON (JT) OHNSON (JT)2062 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1486 1.60926E+13 JENA CARVER JENA CARVER 907 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61145E+13 JENNIFER H PARKIN REVOCABLE TRUST 08/25/1999 08/25/1999 3060 E SHERWOOD CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2537 9.33202E+12 JEREME THAXTON EME THAXTON 1577 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.61141E+13 JEREMY S LANCHBURY; MARGARET A HALL (JT) A HALL (JT)3021 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2518 9.33403E+12 JESSE M KRANNICH; MEREDITH L KRANNICH (JT) ANNICH (JT)1765 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.60933E+13 JESSE N FOX; VIRGINIA R FOX (TC) R FOX (TC)1575 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 JESSE N FOX; VIRGINIA R FOX (TC) R FOX (TC)1575 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.61145E+13 JESSICA IVANKA TREIDL ANKA TREIDL 3018 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.61145E+13 JESSICA IVANKA TREIDL ANKA TREIDL 3018 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 1.62313E+13 JESSICA WALSH SSICA WALSH 2225 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 8.23201E+12 JIMMY REYNOLDS TRUST 05/08/2018 05/08/2018 1221 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1207 1.61625E+13 JIYOUNG CHANG; PILSOON LEE (JT) ON LEE (JT)1646 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 9.30426E+12 JLPDR TR JLPDR TR 509 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.61636E+13 JLSFT JLSFT 1403 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61631E+13 JMG FAMILY LIVING TRUST 09/23/2016 09/23/2016 2313 OAK BLUFF DR CORINTH TX 76210 9.30426E+12 JOAN M ANDREWS; SHANE CARLSON (JT) ARLSON (JT)519 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.60918E+13 JOAN T OBRIEN AN T OBRIEN 973 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60926E+13 JODI L HOWICK DI L HOWICK 972 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30454E+12 JOHANNA BRUNKEN FAMILY RUST AGREEMENT 12/2/1993 T 12/2/1993 341 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5205 1.6144E+13 JOHN & JANE CREER FAMILY TRUST 1/24/2024 T 1/24/2024 3076 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 1.60933E+13 JOHN & LESLIE FRANCIS FAMILY TRUST 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 1600 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1712 9.33403E+12 JOHN B D'ARCY; FLORA C D'ARCY (JT) D'ARCY (JT)1803 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4493 9.30376E+12 JOHN CLARK; LISA CLARK (JT) CLARK (JT)42 FOREST ST APT 5 NEW CANAAN CT 6840 1.61621E+13 JOHN D WEIST; ELLEN F WEIST (JT) WEIST (JT)1739 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61633E+13 JOHN EDGAR BRANNON GAR BRANNON 1570 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.60918E+13 JOHN L BLACK; KAREN S BLACK (JT) BLACK (JT)957 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.62313E+13 JOHN N NIKOLS LIVING TRUST 07/16/2019 07/16/2019 PO BOX 711458 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 1458 1.62313E+13 JOHN N NIKOLS LIVING TRUST 07/16/2019; NICK J NIKOLS CK J NIKOLS PO BOX 711458 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84171 1458 9.28351E+12 JOHN R & CLARA T MICHAEL FAMILY TRUST 10/31/2005 10/31/2005 625 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 8.25428E+12 JOHN R MERENDINO TRUST 12/11/2003; LAURA A MERENDINO TRUST 04/19/899 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 9.29328E+12 JOHN S. PARKINSON; ALICE R. PARKINSON . PARKINSON 1008 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 9.30151E+12 JOHN THOMAS QUINN HOMAS QUINN 1034 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 9.33251E+12 JOHNSON-GURTCHEFF REVOCABLE TRUST 02/19/2021 02/19/2021 1636 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.60925E+13 JON LEATHAM PENMAN & RHEIM BARRANI PENMAN LIVING TRUST 10/18/2024 1062 S DOUGLAS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1506 9.33251E+12 JPB TR JPB TR 1566 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 9.30476E+12 JRA 1994 TRUST 1994 TRUST 435 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 1.60918E+13 JSM REV LIV TRUST V LIV TRUST 951 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 9.3033E+12 JULIE FREED TRUST 03/06/2009 03/06/2009 878 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 1.6144E+13 JULIEN BAUDRAND EN BAUDRAND 2093 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1487 1.62313E+13 JULIET MICKELSON T MICKELSON 2957 E BENCHMARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1466 1.61631E+13 K LVG TR K LVG TR 1446 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 1.61633E+13 KANNIKAR MARSHALL; VERLAN T MARSHALL (JT) RSHALL (JT)1544 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61145E+13 KAREN H HUNTSMAN H HUNTSMAN 500 S HUNTSMAN WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1235 9.33101E+12 KARL & TERRI LINS REVOCABLE TRUST 08/13/2024 08/13/2024 573 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 1.61438E+13 KARL A SOWA TRUST 09/12/2005 09/12/2005 2841 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 9.29327E+12 KATHERINE C ROMNEY REVOCABLE TRUST 12/21/2023 12/21/2023 770 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.6144E+13 KATZ REVOCABLE TRUST 03/01/2024 03/01/2024 875 S DONNER WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2102 8.25428E+12 KAY PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 1256 S 1000 W VERNAL UT 84078 9.30153E+12 KAYE L GUNNELL; RONALD C GUNNELL (JT) UNNELL (JT)51 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.19452E+12 KEELEY M HELLBERG TRUST 07/26/2002 07/26/2002 380 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2247 1.61633E+13 KENNER B KINGSTON; JENNIFER KINGSTON (JT) NGSTON (JT)1615 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 1.61633E+13 KENNER B KINGSTON; JENNIFER KINGSTON (JT) NGSTON (JT)1615 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 1.61435E+13 KENNETH F RASMUSSEN LIVING TRUST 12/19/1997; SHAWNA M RASMUSSEN L 1334 E WILSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3739 1.62333E+13 KENNETH R DAVIS ETH R DAVIS 2465 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1469 1.62333E+13 KENNY LAM; KIM N LAM (JT) N LAM (JT)2534 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 9.33251E+12 KENT & CAPPEY JONES TRUST 02/01/2013 02/01/2013 1627 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4205 9.2948E+12 KENT FLOYD FULLER & ELLA CHRISTINE FULLER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1113 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 1.6144E+13 KEVIN A KEEFE; KAREN G KEEFE (JT) KEEFE (JT)325 PENN RD UNIT 102 WYNNEWOOD PA 19096 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30201E+12 KEVIN BOTT KEVIN BOTT 717 S 5600 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 5301 9.30101E+12 KEVIN L BOTT; TESSA BOTT (JT) A BOTT (JT)1110 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 1.61435E+13 KIM COLLINS-SMITH & RONALD DAVIDSON SMITH REVOCABLE TRUST 05/16/2 1945 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.6144E+13 KJR FAM LIV TRUST M LIV TRUST 3100 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61625E+13 KMA FAM LIV TRUST M LIV TRUST 1719 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61625E+13 KOBE TRUST 12/12/2014 12/12/2014 1680 E EMERSON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2730 1.6033E+13 KOMAS LLC KOMAS LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.62333E+13 KRIS N JOHNSON S N JOHNSON 2558 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1484 1.61633E+13 KRISTEN M STRAY; JAMES E STRAY (JT) STRAY (JT)3615 E LAUREL CREEK DR SAN MATEO CA 94403 4027 1.61413E+13 KRISTIN P HOPSON TRUST 12/27/2021 12/27/2021 1505 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2531 9.33404E+12 KUEHNE FAMILY TRUST 02/10/2021 02/10/2021 1804 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4492 8.142E+12 L R P INVESTMENT LLC ESTMENT LLC PO BOX 700 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 8.144E+12 L R P, LLC L R P, LLC PO BOX 540700 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 1.61431E+13 LAKSHMANAN VENKITARAMAN; DEEPTHI LAKSHMAN (JT) KSHMAN (JT)1771 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 1.61633E+13 LARRY & ANN WRIGHT FAMILY TRUST 03/01/2021 03/01/2021 1554 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 8.25278E+12 LARRY & LORI DALTON TRUST 02/03/2005 02/03/2005 1149 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25278E+12 LARRY F MAURER; JOLENE M MAURER (JT) MAURER (JT)1107 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.62333E+13 LARRY SHELTON RRY SHELTON 2531 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1485 1.61431E+13 LAURA FORSGREN; MATT FORSGREN (JT) RSGREN (JT)4033 S PARKVIEW DR MILLCREEK UT 84124 3418 1.61438E+13 LAURA IMES MCBRIDE MES MCBRIDE 2821 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61618E+13 LAURA MCDONOUGH A MCDONOUGH 1695 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 1.62313E+13 LAURA MCNERNEY; NICHOLAS BERTAGNOLLI BERTAGNOLLI 2293 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 1.62333E+13 LE TRAN; VAN TRAN (JT) N TRAN (JT)2464 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 9.30203E+12 LEIGH ANNE NEUMEYER REVOCABLE TRUST 8/21/2016 T 8/21/2016 375 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2256 9.2948E+12 LEO & HARRIET HOPF LIVING TRUST 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 1099 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 1.61126E+13 LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 08/29/2022 08/29/2022 3054 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2123 1.61431E+13 LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 11/14/2011 11/14/2011 1901 CALLE DE ESPANA LAS VEGAS NV 89102 8.144E+12 LEWIS, FOSS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC RUCTION INC 2350 S 1900 W STE 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 8.23201E+12 LEXICON INVESTMENTS, LLC TMENTS, LLC 1942 N BECK ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 1221 9.30202E+12 LGH TRST LGH TRST 409 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2282 9.30202E+12 LGH TRST LGH TRST 409 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2282 1.61743E+13 LIANA HATHAWAY; JOHN ROBERT WISE (JT) T WISE (JT)50960 FOX TRAIL GRANGER IN 46530 9.30202E+12 LINDA M HOWELL REVOCABLE TRUST 07/02/2021 07/02/2021 378 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 1.60926E+13 LISA J VANDERSTEEN VANDERSTEEN 964 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25126E+12 LITTLE AMERICA HOTEL CORP HOTEL CORP PO BOX 92108 AUSTIN TX 78738 1.61633E+13 LITTLEBERG LLC TLEBERG LLC 2425 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1926 1.61631E+13 LIZ SIANTZ; MARK MCDOWELL (JT) DOWELL (JT)1432 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 9.29452E+12 LIZABETH O'NAN; SEAN G O'NAN (JT) O'NAN (JT)1460 WOOD ROW WAY WELLINGTON FL 33414 9.30203E+12 LKUT, LLC LKUT, LLC 3944 N 450 W PROVO UT 84604 9.30452E+12 LOLA LIVING TRUST 09/29/2023 09/29/2023 847 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3357 9.29327E+12 LORENZO BOTTO & CRISTINA RASPOLLINI REVOCABLE TRUST DATED 4/5/201 729 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 1.6232E+13 LOUIS R BARROWS; ANDREA M BARROWS (JT) ARROWS (JT)2119 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.61631E+13 LUCY ANDERSON; CRISTOFORO FEO (JT) RO FEO (JT)1344 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.6232E+13 LYNN B MABEY YNN B MABEY 2155 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1424 1.62333E+13 M IQBAL SIAL IQBAL SIAL 2513 S PROMONTORY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1473 9.19451E+12 MACCALL HOLDINGS LLC OLDINGS LLC 185 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1505 9.33403E+12 MADELINE TANK; ERIN MARTIN (JT) MARTIN (JT)1771 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.61413E+13 MADELYN CANNON; RYAN CANNON (JT) CANNON (JT)1529 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2531 9.30376E+12 MANOR HOLDINGS LC HOLDINGS LC PO BOX 755 OREM UT 84059 1.6144E+13 MARC DAVEY REVOCABLE TRUST 07/20/2016 07/20/2016 3081 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 9.29301E+12 MARC ENGELS; REBECCA ENGELS (JT) ENGELS (JT)919 N HILLTOP RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3700 9.30376E+12 MARC WEINREICH TRUST 09/08/2015 09/08/2015 748 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30151E+12 MARIE HYNES SCHULTHIES LIVING TRUST 03/03/2022; RONALD AVON SCHUL 1015 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2218 9.33251E+12 MARILYN D CORBETT N D CORBETT 1590 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 1.6144E+13 MARILYN H PETERSON REVOCABLE TRUST 02/23/1989 02/23/1989 3069 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1478 1.6144E+13 MARK C MOENCH; MARTHA Y MOENCH (JT) MOENCH (JT)3020 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1477 9.33202E+12 MARK IRVING SEGAL RVING SEGAL 1583 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.3033E+12 MARK R LEWIS TRUST 05/05/1989; SUSAN H LEWIS TRUST 05/05/1989 05 970 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 9.29301E+12 MARLA A HOLMAN MERRILL MAN MERRILL 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 9.29301E+12 MARLA A HOLMAN MERRILL MAN MERRILL 633 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 8.25428E+12 MARLON MICHEL RLON MICHEL 36 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 1.61631E+13 MARTHA SHANNON THA SHANNON 1366 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 9.3033E+12 MARVA MATCH LIVING TRUST 06/10/2014 06/10/2014 934 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 MATTHEW B SMITH; CYNTHIA A SMITH (JT) SMITH (JT)910 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.61631E+13 MATTHEW CARDON THEW CARDON 1374 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61413E+13 MATTHEW F KIRK; STEPHANIE B KIRK (JT) B KIRK (JT)1467 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 1.62313E+13 MATTHEW FLATT; WEN YUAN G FLATT (JT) FLATT (JT)2285 S BENCHMARK CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1471 9.33202E+12 MATTHEW L BARRETT W L BARRETT 1565 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.60933E+13 MATTHEW PARKIN; ANN PARKIN (JT) PARKIN (JT)1553 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 9.28354E+12 MATTHEW PERUN; JAMIE PERUN (JT) PERUN (JT)20 S 200 E # 1 SPANISH FORK UT 84660 2126 9.30201E+12 MATTHEW SCOTT DINGER; LEWIS WONG (JT) S WONG (JT)2961 S TOWER HILL WY WEST VALLEY UT 84120 9.29328E+12 MATTHEW T LYON; BIANCA A LYON (JT) A LYON (JT)968 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.61435E+13 MCKENNA LEVEY REVOCABLE TRUST 04/30/2021 04/30/2021 2005 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 9.29327E+12 MCLESKEY KIVING TRUST 06/04/2015 06/04/2015 800 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.33251E+12 MDK REV TRUST; LK REV TRUST K REV TRUST 1668 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.61431E+13 MELANIE BROWN LYON TRUST 10/16/2014; PAUL DURR LYON TRUST 10/16/2 1785 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30151E+12 MELINDA RIRIE SLIGHTING FAMILY TRUST 02/01/2023 02/01/2023 163 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2261 1.61618E+13 MELISSA A P KRAJESKI P KRAJESKI 1600 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 1.61126E+13 MELISSA CHAN LEWIS; LEWIS FAMILY TRUST 08/29/2022 (SURV) 2022 (SU 3054 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2123 1.61631E+13 MELISSA K LADAKIS A K LADAKIS 1382 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61618E+13 MELVIN NOSANCHUK; PATRICIA A NOSANCHUK (JT) ANCHUK (JT)1646 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2806 9.30376E+12 MELVIN SMITH; DANIEL PUNT (JT) L PUNT (JT)762 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.33403E+12 MERILYN P HARVEY YN P HARVEY 824 E SOUTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 1338 1.60926E+13 MEYERS & KAPLAN LIVING TRUST 11/05/2018 11/05/2018 944 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60918E+13 MICHAEL & CATHERINE RIDD FAMILY TRUST 07/18/2023 07/18/2023 971 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25428E+12 MICHAEL BALOGH; SUSAN BALOGH (JT) BALOGH (JT)32 W 200 S # 409 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 8.25428E+12 MICHAEL BALOGH; SUSAN E BALOGH (JT) BALOGH (JT)32 W 200 S # 409 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 9.33251E+12 MICHAEL D RASMUSSEN; LISA MARIEL WIRTHLIN (JT) RTHLIN (JT)1628 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 1.61633E+13 MICHAEL DALE JR MILLS E JR MILLS 1532 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.62333E+13 MICHAEL J COOPER EL J COOPER 2455 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 9.29403E+12 MICHAEL P TESKE TRUST 5/25/1994 T 5/25/1994 938 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 1.62313E+13 MICHAEL S MACKRIS; MEREDITH F MACKRIS (JT) ACKRIS (JT)2215 S LAKELINE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1423 1.61633E+13 MICHAEL WHITE; CHRISOULA ANDREOU (JT) NDREOU (JT)1588 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61438E+13 MICHELLE H BRADSHAW REVOCABLE TRUST 05/19/2022 05/19/2022 2100 S BELAIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1411 1.60933E+13 MIKE YEATES MIKE YEATES 1016 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 1.61438E+13 MING & LIMON CHEN TRUST 11/05/2014 11/05/2014 2079 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 9.28354E+12 MING & LIMON CHEN TRUST 11/05/2014 11/05/2014 2079 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 1.61743E+13 MITCH DAVID WEAVER; FAYE WEAVER FAYE WEAVER 1314 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 1.61138E+13 MITCHELL CURTIS; MAILE CURTIS (JT) CURTIS (JT)2942 E DEVONSHIRE CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2526 1.61138E+13 MJHR TRUST MJHR TRUST 1379 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2557 1.61635E+13 MOFFETT; DARRYL G MOFFETT (JT) OFFETT (JT)4173 E ABINADI RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84124 4001 9.30201E+12 MOJABI FAMILY TRUST 09/28/2021 09/28/2021 1012 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2242 8.25126E+12 MOYLE INVESTMENT LC VESTMENT LC P O BOX 798 VALLEY FORGE PA 19482 8.25126E+12 MOYLE INVESTMENTS LC ESTMENTS LC P O BOX 798 VALLEY FORGE PA 19482 8.25102E+12 MUI INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 892 N COLORADO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 3852 9.30153E+12 MUTSCHELLER FAMILY TRUST 01/15/2020 01/15/2020 29 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 1.61633E+13 NATHAN E DOWLING; MARGARET C SQUIRES (JT) QUIRES (JT)1550 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.60933E+13 NATHAN J MORGAN; KAREN B MORGAN (JT) MORGAN (JT)1529 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61413E+13 NAYER H HONARV REVOCABLE TRUST 12/01/2001 12/01/2001 PO BOX 58742 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 742 9.30101E+12 NEBEKER HOUSE LLC R HOUSE LLC 1141 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2258 1.60926E+13 NEIL J VICKERS; TANYA M VICKERS (JT) ICKERS (JT)966 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.62333E+13 NHAT NGUYEN; THULAN NGO (JT) AN NGO (JT)2478 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.61631E+13 NICHOLAS & NATALIE NEWMAN TRUST 02/05/2024 02/05/2024 1445 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3736 1.62313E+13 NICHOLAS JAMES DANZIGER; ANNA MCKENZIE WILSON (JT) WILSON (JT)2348 FUNSTON AVE SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 1.61743E+13 NICOLE POULSON; TYLER POULSON (JT) OULSON (JT)1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 8.25428E+12 NICOLOFF FAMILY TRUST 05/12/2008 05/12/2008 913 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2237 9.30151E+12 NINA DE LACY; BRIAN ALLEN DICKINSON (JT) KINSON (JT)1046 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 1.61633E+13 NMOPRO LLC NMOPRO LLC 1267 E SHERMAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2545 9.30203E+12 NORIENE O JEE LIVING TRUST 05/21/2019 05/21/2019 1258 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2246 9.30101E+12 NORTH COVE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 1055 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2243 9.30452E+12 NORTHPOINT ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 798 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3353 1.61013E+13 OBSIDIAN, LLC SIDIAN, LLC 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1619 9.30101E+12 OLIVER LI WEI YEH; ANGELA POON (JT) A POON (JT)1043 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2243 1.60925E+13 OMAR A BARRANI; JON L PENMAN; RHELM B PENMAN (JT) PENMAN (JT)1756 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 9.29327E+12 OWEN GINTIS OWEN GINTIS 760 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3724 1.61418E+13 P T CAMPBELL REVOCABLE TRUST 02/12/2020 02/12/2020 1599 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.6033E+13 PARADIGM RESOURCES LC ESOURCES LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.6033E+13 PARADIGM RESOURCES LC ESOURCES LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 9.31203E+12 PARTICK & NICHOLE PARRISH FAMILY TRUST 06/07/2019 06/07/2019 257 E ELEVENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2517 1.61635E+13 PATRICK DEPAULIS; TRACIE DEPAULIS (JT) PAULIS (JT)1335 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 9.33403E+12 PAUL M DOUGAN; TERRELL H DOUGAN (JT) DOUGAN (JT)1813 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4493 9.29327E+12 PAUL WINTEROWD L WINTEROWD 697 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61633E+13 PETER & DINA DEWEERD FAMILY TRUST 02/09/2012 02/09/2012 1548 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.61635E+13 PETER FRANCIS TER FRANCIS 1363 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 PETER IDSTROM; JULIE DILLON (JT) DILLON (JT)1635 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3802 9.29452E+12 PHIL & AUDREY JIRICKO TRUST 09/07/2012 09/07/2012 957 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61625E+13 PHILIP PLUMB; JESSICA S PLUMB (JT) PLUMB (JT)1705 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 9.33126E+12 PHILLIP E BARNETTE & JANET E BARNETTE FAMILY TRUST 12/23/2014 12/1475 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.62333E+13 PHONG NGUYEN; CUC THI NGUYEN (JT) NGUYEN (JT)2498 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 9.29327E+12 PIERO G RUFFINENGO REVOCABLE TRUST 12/18/2007 12/18/2007 820 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.28354E+12 PRESTON CHIARO STON CHIARO 689 N NEW BONNEVILLE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4281 9.33452E+12 PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL NS HOSPITAL PO BOX 3390 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84110 3390 9.3033E+12 QTIP TRUST UNDER THE CLARENCE T SCHMITZ 05/03/2013; KAROLINE ESTE 946 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 9.30401E+12 R&SK FAM TR R&SK FAM TR 988 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 RA FM TR; CML FAM TRUST L FAM TRUST 904 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60926E+13 RACHEL JACOBS CHEL JACOBS 1702 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1334 9.30426E+12 RAMIRO GARZON MIRO GARZON 479 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 8.25428E+12 RANDAL B & GLORIA L AUSTIN REVOCABLE TRUST 1/31/2002 T 1/31/2002 815 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2285 9.30202E+12 RANDOLPH NELSON; CYNTHIA NELSON (JT) NELSON (JT)350 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 1.60933E+13 RANDY T WESTPAL; DOUGLAS R CHADWICK (JT) ADWICK (JT)1521 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61618E+13 RAY PETER TETREAULT; ANNE WOLFER (JT) WOLFER (JT)2915 MILLCREEK CANYON RD MILLCREEK UT 84109 3107 9.19452E+12 REDOUBT TRUST 06/10/2014 06/10/2014 9161 S BARONAY CIR SANDY UT 84093 3858 1.61438E+13 REIMER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST 11/24/2002 11/24/2002 1840 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1498 1.6033E+13 RESEARCH PARK ASSOCIATES INC OCIATES INC 10619 S JORDAN GATEWAY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 9.3033E+12 RF TRST RF TRST 906 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.60926E+13 RHETT C EVANS ETT C EVANS 1857 E HARVARD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1804 1.61418E+13 RHETT W CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 5185 BRAWNER PL ALEXANDRIA VA 22304 9.33251E+12 RICHARD & BRENDA BROWNTRUST 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 1648 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 1.6094E+13 RICHARD & TANYA JOHNSON FAMILY TRUST 1/3/2024 ST 1/3/2024 994 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 1.60933E+13 RICHARD C JEDRZIEWSKI LIVING TRUST 06/15/2022 06/15/2022 1537 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61633E+13 RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT) W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.31203E+12 RICHARD F GROW; JODY W GROW (JT) W GROW (JT)623 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 1.61633E+13 RICHARD SPENCE BURDETT; SHARON ANN JENSEN ANN JENSEN 1592 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61633E+13 RIO CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61633E+13 RIO CHRISTENSEN CHRISTENSEN 1538 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 9.30151E+12 RL&JMCR TR RL&JMCR TR 1039 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2248 9.2948E+12 ROBERT & KAREN BURKS REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 9.2948E+12 ROBERT & KAREN BURKS REVOCABLE TRUST 9/12/2017 T 9/12/2017 1131 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 8.25278E+12 ROBERT & TERESA KAY FAMILY TRUST 04/23/2010 04/23/2010 1116 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 1.60933E+13 ROBERT A SPERLING; JULIE A SPERLING (JT) ERLING (JT)1020 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 9.30202E+12 ROBERT C COSBY; MARY M COSBY (JT) COSBY (JT)302 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2255 9.30376E+12 ROBERT FOGARTY ERT FOGARTY 776 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30454E+12 ROBERT RYAN RICHARDS; MARTINA WRIGHT RICHARDS (JT) CHARDS (JT)343 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5201 9.30152E+12 ROBERT S WARD; RUTH M INDAHYUNG (JT) AHYUNG (JT)166 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2260 9.29176E+12 ROBERT Z TASHJIAN; SARAH MAJERCIK (JT) JERCIK (JT)1036 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 9.31203E+12 ROBIN & JANE KIM FAMILY TRUST 10/09/2020 10/09/2020 615 N CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5207 9.29403E+12 ROBIN DUNLEAVY IN DUNLEAVY 930 E NORTHVALE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4013 9.29403E+12 ROBIN DUNLEAVY IN DUNLEAVY 930 E NORTHVALE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4013 1.60925E+13 ROBYN G CRAIG; BRENT H CRAIG (JT) CRAIG (JT)855 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1627 1.6033E+13 ROCKWELL COLLINS SIMULATION & TRAINING SOLUTIONS LLC LUTIONS LLC 400 COLLINS RD NE CEDAR RAPIDS IA 52498 1.6144E+13 ROGER & ANNE WALTHER REVOCABLE TRUST 3/31/1992 T 3/31/1992 3636 BUCHANAN ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 1709 1.6144E+13 ROGER & ANNE WALTHER REVOCABLE TRUST 03/31/1992 03/31/1992 3636 BUCHANAN ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 1709 9.3033E+12 ROGER & PAULA EVERSHED LIVING TRUST 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 3772 W SAND HILL CIR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 8713 9.30153E+12 ROGER K HOBBS REVOCABLE TRUST 03/11/2022; DENISE C HOBBS REVOCABL 41 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.30452E+12 ROLAND K BARBERO & CASSANDRA E BARBERO LIVING TRUST 01/26/2016 01 789 N NORTHPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3358 9.33251E+12 RONALD SOREN HANSON TRUST FBO FAMILY TRUST 11/21/2019; SHIRLEY HA 1548 E HANOVER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4279 1.61636E+13 ROSE FRANCIS; NATHAN ANDREW BRAIN (JT) BRAIN (JT)1421 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.61413E+13 ROXANNE BARTEL; DANIELA SOLZBACHER (JT) BACHER (JT)1497 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 1.61438E+13 ROY BLOEBAUM FAMILY TRUST 08/31/201 T 08/31/201 2052 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1486 1.6144E+13 RUDY GOBERT RUDY GOBERT 3113 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61743E+13 RUSS L ISENBURG; ANN MARIE ISENBURG (JT) ENBURG (JT)1303 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61633E+13 RWD TRUST RWD TRUST 1564 E BLAINE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3801 1.60925E+13 RYAN H SAVAGE; JULIE E SAVAGE (JT) SAVAGE (JT)1707 E 900 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1333 9.30376E+12 RYAN P LOWDER AN P LOWDER 704 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.30376E+12 RYAN STEVEN GOODWIN VEN GOODWIN 710 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 1.61413E+13 S CHRISTOPHER CLARK FAMILY TRUST 06/7/2011; JAMIE T CLARK FAMILY 1409 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 1.61633E+13 S JOHN WEBBER; J&DWT BBER; J&DWT 3553 E SUTTON CIR COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 6150 9.30201E+12 S RAY, LLC S RAY, LLC 170 W 400 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 1.6112E+13 SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 5460 1.61625E+13 SALT LAKE COUNTY LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 4575 9.29403E+12 SAMUEL & DIANE STEWART FAMILY TRUST 03/19/2019 03/19/2019 269 N A ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2511 9.30427E+12 SARA M LENHERR; SCOTT R MILLER (JT) MILLER (JT)569 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 9.29326E+12 SARAH CHILDS; STUART CHILDS (JT) CHILDS (JT)997 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4028 1.61433E+13 SARAH DEVOLL REVOCABLE TRUST 07/13/2020 07/13/2020 1725 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30454E+12 SCHMIDT FAMILY LIVING TRUST 5/8/2014 ST 5/8/2014 344 E CHARITY CV SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5205 1.61633E+13 SCHRIBER-KHAN FAMILY 2005 TRUST 08/31/2005 08/31/2005 3451 N WINDRIVER CT EDEN UT 84310 9549 9.33126E+12 SCHWARTZ-GARTRELL FAMILY TRUST 06/04/1997 06/04/1997 1445 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.61435E+13 SCOTT & ANNETTE TURVILLE FAMILY TRUST 09/21/1989 09/21/1989 3812 S HONEYCUT RD MILLCREEK UT 84106 3820 9.33401E+12 SCOTT & JENNIFER TRUST 05/23/2024 05/23/2024 333 N FEDERAL HEIGHTS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4440 8.25428E+12 SCOTT CONWAY 2012 GIFT TRUST 12/11/2012 12/11/2012 843 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2285 1.6144E+13 SCOTT PELICHOFF; LYNN PELICHOFF (JT) ICHOFF (JT)3173 E CARRIGAN CANYON DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1476 1.61413E+13 SES 147, LLC ES 147, LLC 111 E BROADWAY ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 5225 9.32202E+12 SG REVOC TRUST; OPG REVOC TRUST REVOC TRUST 693 N NORTHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4053 8.25102E+12 SHACKLETON'S ENDURANCE, LLC URANCE, LLC 2471 S 150 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 8.25126E+12 SHACKLETON'S ENDURANCE, LLC URANCE, LLC 2471 S 150 W BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 1.61435E+13 SHANON K BERGMAN; M GREG BERGMANN (JT) RGMANN (JT)2025 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61435E+13 SHANON K BERGMAN; M GREG BERGMANN (JT) RGMANN (JT)2025 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61743E+13 SHARRON B BARNUM TRUST 06/14/2023 06/14/2023 1871 S 1300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3636 1.60926E+13 SHEILA PAGE; MICHAEL A COX (JT) A COX (JT)913 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 8.25428E+12 SHELDON J WILLIAMS; JANET C WILLIAMS (JT) LLIAMS (JT)941 N SANDHURST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2237 1.61621E+13 SHELLEY L JARRARD; HELEN A REYNOLDS (JT) YNOLDS (JT)1751 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 9.32229E+12 SHUBELLA-ZUTI FAMILY TRUST 12/20/2000 12/20/2000 696 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4042 9.29452E+12 SHUI CHIN CHAN I CHIN CHAN 975 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 8.25126E+12 SINCLAIR TRANSPORTATION COMPANY ION COMPANY PO BOX 92108 AUSTIN TX 78709 9.33251E+12 SIRIUS CAPITAL LLC CAPITAL LLC 1973 W GRAYHAWK CIR ST GEORGE UT 84770 1.6114E+13 SJG FAM TRUST; MCG FAM TRUST G FAM TRUST 3020 E CHAUCER PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2504 9.30203E+12 SLH TRUST 02/12/1999 02/12/1999 407 E CAPITOL OAKS LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2256 8.243E+12 SOSSIHAUS5, LLC IHAUS5, LLC 3350 S 2940 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3136 8.243E+12 SOSSIHAUS5, LLC IHAUS5, LLC 3350 S 2940 E MILLCREEK UT 84109 3136 9.33403E+12 SRINIVASAN FAMILY TRUST 07/29/2021 07/29/2021 1793 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 1.61438E+13 SRINIVASAN GOVINDARAJAN; SUJATHA SAMPATH (JT) AMPATH (JT)2080 S BELAIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1409 8.23226E+12 STAKER & PARSON COMPANIES N COMPANIES 2350 S 1900 W # 100 OGDEN UT 84401 3481 9.30176E+12 STANFORD P FITTS; MELANIE H FITTS (JT) FITTS (JT)209 E ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2261 1.6111E+13 STATE OF UTAH DIV OF PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION PO BOX 146001 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 6001 1.61438E+13 STAVROS G DRAKOS; ALIKI C MILIOTI (JT) ILIOTI (JT)1865 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 1.60926E+13 STEPHANIE Z KLEIN NIE Z KLEIN 976 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25278E+12 STEPHEN BACH; PATRICE BACH (JT) E BACH (JT)1121 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.60933E+13 STEPHEN GLENN SENINGER REOVACBLE TRUST 04/22/2002; KATHRYN J SENI 1561 E YALE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1717 1.61438E+13 STEPHEN J CARSON; POOK R CARSON (JT) CARSON (JT)2087 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1496 1.61431E+13 STEPHEN KENT BRADLEY; BARRY FRANSON (JT) RANSON (JT)1795 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.30101E+12 STEPHEN L MANNSCHRECK; MARIAN J MANNSCHRECK (JT) CHRECK (JT)1261 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2254 9.33201E+12 STEPHEN M HARMSEN; KELLY HARMSEN (JT) ARMSEN (JT)1616 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4257 8.25276E+12 STEPHEN S REVOC TRUST; STEPHANIE S REVOC TRUST REVOC TRUST 11 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 1.61141E+13 STEVE J GOORMAN; CHRISTA ZARO (JT) A ZARO (JT)3017 E ST MARYS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2511 8.25278E+12 STEVE RAGSDALE; NAOMI RAGSDALE (JT) GSDALE (JT)14874 S VILLAGE VISTA DR DRAPER UT 84020 5563 8.25278E+12 STEVEN & DEBORAH TUTTLE TRUST 04/22/2024 04/22/2024 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25278E+12 STEVEN & DEBORAH TUTTLE TRUST 04/22/2024 04/22/2024 1159 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 1.6144E+13 STEVEN A BURGESS N A BURGESS 1888 S CARRIGAN CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1475 1.62333E+13 STEVEN K WALKER; SHERRY L WALKER (JT) WALKER (JT)2452 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.60918E+13 STEVEN L LONG & LISA L LONG FAMILY TRUST 05/05/2022 05/05/2022 1608 E MICHIGAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1712 1.61433E+13 STEVEN SKAAR TEVEN SKAAR 9846 E EMERALD DR SUN LAKES AZ 85248 9.29452E+12 STEVEN W ALLRED EN W ALLRED 1007 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.29328E+12 STEVENS LIVING TRUST 01/06/2015 01/06/2015 1020 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4030 1.61413E+13 STEWART OGDEN; JOAN P OGDEN (JT) OGDEN (JT)1423 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2550 1.61141E+13 STL IRR TRUST L IRR TRUST 3014 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2519 1.61438E+13 STRALEY FAMILY TRUST 12/28/2011 12/28/2011 3536 E MONZA DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 3829 9.32202E+12 SUNDANCE 2012 IRREVOCABLE CHILDREN'S TRUST I 12/03/2012 12/03/201 1045 QUARRY MOUNTAIN LN PARK CITY UT 84098 9.33251E+12 SUSA DAWSON FAMILY TRUST 07/15/1998 07/15/1998 1654 E FEDERAL POINTE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4268 1.62333E+13 SVKL TR SVKL TR 2423 S SUMMIT CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1470 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TR AGREE; EBC 1998 TR AGREE 98 TR AGREE 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TRUST; EBC 1998 TRUST 1998 TRUST 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 SWC JR 1998 TRUST; EBC 1998 TRUST 1998 TRUST 1687 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 9.19451E+12 SYNTAX INVESTMENTS LC ESTMENTS LC PO BOX 540478 NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 9.29452E+12 T H S C JR FM TR; T P K S C FM TR K S C FM TR 999 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.61418E+13 T&CD LIV TR T&CD LIV TR 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.61126E+13 TAG SLC, LLC AG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 697 8.25428E+12 TAMI W MARQUARDT TRUST 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 42 E KNIGHTSBRIDGE LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2241 9.28351E+12 TAMIKO A LONG MIKO A LONG 609 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 1.61618E+13 TAMSIN E STONE SIN E STONE 1625 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2825 9.33126E+12 TARA ROSEN; PAUL ROSEN (JT) ROSEN (JT)1527 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.60926E+13 TC TRUST 05/29/2024 05/29/2024 927 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60926E+13 TCD PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC 3640 JOHNSTON WY NE NORTH LIBERTY IA 52317 1.6112E+13 TEANCUM PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.61126E+13 TEANCUM PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 3052 EMIGRATION CANYON RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.60926E+13 TERESA BRAMWELL SA BRAMWELL 923 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.61633E+13 TERRI HUGHES; IAN HUGHES (JT) HUGHES (JT)1522 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61413E+13 THE BAE FAMILY TRUST 07/10/2019 07/10/2019 1479 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2529 9.33202E+12 THE MARK DODSON & JAMIE ZUSSMAN TRUST 06/25/2019 06/25/2019 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 THE MARK DODSON & JAMIE ZUSSMAN TRUST 06/25/2019 06/25/2019 1589 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 1.6034E+13 THERA TECH THERA TECH 400 INTERPACE PKWY PARSIPPANY NJ 7054 1120 1.61418E+13 THOMAS & CANDACE DEE LIVING TRUST 08/27/2010 08/27/2010 1575 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 9.30427E+12 THOMAS B PILGER AS B PILGER 545 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 1.60926E+13 THOMAS G RICHMOND; CYNTHIA SQUIRE (JT) SQUIRE (JT)928 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 8.25278E+12 THOMAS K CARLIN REVOCABLE TRUST 10/08/2018; ASHLEY A CARLIN REVOC 1102 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2262 9.33251E+12 THOMAS M BONACCI; KRISTIN S BONACCI (JT) ONACCI (JT)1024 S 1500 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1641 9.33126E+12 THOMAS M BROOKS; CARRIE L BROOKS (TC) BROOKS (TC)1489 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33126E+12 THOMAS M. BROOKS S M. BROOKS 1489 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 1.6114E+13 THOMAS R GRANT; SUZANNE T GRANT (JT) GRANT (JT)3025 E DICKENS PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2505 9.30153E+12 TIAUNA MADISON SCOTT ROEMER; ZACHARY KEITH SCOTT ROEMER (JT) ROEM 989 N ENSIGN VISTA DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2265 1.61636E+13 TIFFANY W PETERSON W PETERSON 1441 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 9.30176E+12 TIMOTHY B HUFFAKER; MARGARET M HUFFAKER (JT) FFAKER (JT)693 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2140 9.30427E+12 TIMOTHY WATCKE OTHY WATCKE 529 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3324 9.3033E+12 TOM KEENAN TOM KEENAN 960 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2216 1.61633E+13 TRAVIS LONG; JULIANA GROSCOST (JT) OSCOST (JT)1504 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 8.25278E+12 TRISTAN BRUNIER MELE RUNIER MELE 1135 N TWICKENHAM DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2213 8.25428E+12 TRUONG PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 1559 W 3860 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 6291 1.61621E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1759 E ROSECREST DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2641 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1614 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2662 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1709 E BRYAN AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2605 1.61625E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1749 E KENSINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2621 1.61633E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1516 E GLEN ARBOR ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3813 1.61635E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1357 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3715 1.61636E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1427 E WESTMINSTER AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3717 1.60918E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 965 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60918E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 963 S DIESTEL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1701 1.60925E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 1.60925E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1740 E SUNNYSIDE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1328 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1583 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1583 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1721 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1601 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1619 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1635 E YALECREST AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1723 1.60933E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1030 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1714 1.61431E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 5912 RAPHAEL DR HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1961 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1985 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3315 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2015 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 3317 1.61435E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2084 S SCENIC CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1437 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1870 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1498 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2857 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 2857 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1446 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1835 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 1.61438E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1849 S LAKELINE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1492 9.30101E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1233 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2254 9.30202E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 355 E CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2252 9.3033E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 856 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.3033E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 846 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.30376E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 790 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2210 9.31126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 643 E SIXTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3704 1.6232E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 812 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 1832 1.6114E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3021 E SHAKESPEARE PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2514 1.61141E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3370 W 500 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 4402 1.61141E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3020 E THACKERAY PL SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2519 1.61418E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1663 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61418E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1615 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2560 1.61433E+13 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1755 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.28352E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1311 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 9.33101E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 529 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4245 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED PO BOX 58248 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84158 248 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1455 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4226 9.33126E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1507 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33202E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1553 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4228 9.33251E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 9.33251E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1672 E NEW BEDFORD DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4277 9.33403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1757 E FORT DOUGLAS CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4451 9.29327E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 810 E EDGEHILL RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3725 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 958 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4005 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29403E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 900 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4023 9.29452E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 1043 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4004 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 451 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 3125 E KENNEDY DR # 102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2169 9.30426E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 469 E NORTHMONT WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3322 9.30452E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 849 N JUNIPERPOINT DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3357 9.32229E+12 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 690 N RICHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4042 1.61631E+13 TYLER R ANDERSON R ANDERSON 1440 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3737 1.61743E+13 TYLER R KEARN LER R KEARN 1 ARBOR ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94131 1.61013E+13 UNITED STATES (MILITARY RESERVE FT DOUGLAS) FT DOUGLAS)7500 E 53RD PL # 1108 DENVER CO 80266 9918 1.6031E+13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF AMERICA 125 S STATE ST # 8100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84138 1147 1.6034E+13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF AMERICA 125 S STATE ST # 8100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84138 1147 1.61013E+13 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ITY OF UTAH 2733 E PARLEYS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1619 1.6031E+13 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOUNDATION 303 S CHIPETA WY # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.6034E+13 UTAH STATE DIVISION OF PARKS & RECREATION RECREATION PO BOX 146301 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 6301 9.29327E+12 VALHALLA INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 711 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3718 1.60926E+13 VALORIE J PARKER LIVING TRUST 11/04/2024 11/04/2024 922 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.31203E+12 VANESSA INEZ PAYNE TRUST 02/28/2023 02/28/2023 315 E CAPITOL PARK AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5209 1.61126E+13 VENGATA C CHINNATHAMBI; VINODHINI KOLANDAVELU (TC) DAVELU (TC)3125 E KENNEDY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2124 9.33104E+12 VFB TRUST VFB TRUST 1389 E TOMAHAWK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4248 9.32202E+12 VGC TRUST VGC TRUST 602 N TERRACE HILLS DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4033 8.25126E+12 VICTORY STORAGE LLC STORAGE LLC 915 PLUM CT NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 9.31203E+12 VILLAR JOINT FAMILY TRUST 03/25/2013 03/25/2013 290 E PENNY PARADE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2857 9.30176E+12 VITAMIN Q CAPITAL SERIES D LLC ERIES D LLC 1034 N CHARTWELL CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2200 1.61433E+13 VON WHITBY VON WHITBY 1739 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2562 9.31203E+12 W SCOTT & KATHY TENNEY LIVING TRUST 4/2/2025 ST 4/2/2025 346 E REDBRICK CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 5201 1.6033E+13 WAKARA LC WAKARA LC 2733 E PARLEYS WY # 300 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1661 1.61625E+13 WASATCH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH RIAN CHURCH 1626 S 1700 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2662 1.61013E+13 WASATCH RESEARCH PARK, LLC H PARK, LLC 299 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 1941 1.6034E+13 WATSON LABORATORIES ABORATORIES 400 INTERPACE PKWY PARSIPPANY NJ 7054 1120 9.19451E+12 WAYNE & LESLEY WEBSTER LIVING TRUST 11/05/2021 11/05/2021 429 E OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2244 1.61618E+13 WAYSON D WIGHT; SABRINA B WIGHT (JT) WIGHT (JT)1640 E 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2828 9.19476E+12 WEIBO CHENG; YONGGANG ZHANG (JT) ZHANG (JT)1334 N CANYON OAKS WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2283 9.2948E+12 WESLEY B LARSEN; ROBIN C LARSEN (JT) LARSEN (JT)1149 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4041 9.30376E+12 WESLEY ROBERT WHITE REVOCABLE TRUST 08/28/1975; CONSTANCE B WHITE 804 N EASTCAPITOL BLVD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2212 9.29327E+12 WGG TRUST WGG TRUST 657 E EIGHTEENTH AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 3716 1.61618E+13 WILEY & CHRISTINA THUET FAMILY TRUST 10/13/2017 10/13/2017 1597 S 1600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 2829 9.29452E+12 WILLIAM A PAULOS FAMILY TRUST 04/30/2021; JULIE S PAULOS FAMILY T 987 E NORTHBONNEVILLE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4002 1.60926E+13 WILLIAM J EVANS; JEAN M EVANS (JT) EVANS (JT)968 S MILITARY DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1326 9.30201E+12 WILLIAM J FAIR; KARI M FAIR (JT) M FAIR (JT)1066 N OAK FOREST RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2257 8.25276E+12 WILLIAM S CAMPBELL TRUST 08/28/2018 08/28/2018 15 E CHURCHILL DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 2267 9.28351E+12 WILLIAM T COULDWELL; MARIE F COULDWELL (JT) LDWELL (JT)643 N PERRYS HOLLOW RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4201 9.32202E+12 WILMA S LIVSEY TRUST 11/06/2023 11/06/2023 925 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 4206 1.6033E+13 WOODFIRE L.L.C DFIRE L.L.C 303 S CHIPETA WY # 100 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 1.61418E+13 YIHUI PAN; CHUNMING CHEN (JT) G CHEN (JT)1589 S DEVONSHIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84108 2552 1.62333E+13 YURI BAE CHAN TRUST 12/20/2019 12/20/2019 2486 S SCENIC DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 1480 1.62333E+13 ZENON BABIAK; MARY TETER BABIAK (JT) BABIAK (JT)2167 HUNTINGDON RD HUNTINGDON VALLEY PA 19006 1.61743E+13 ZYANYA BEJARANO; MATTHEW TOWLE (JT) TOWLE (JT)1310 E DOWNINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 3735 This page has intentionally been left blank 6. Original Petition SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM To: Cc: From: Date: Re: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Tammy Hunsaker, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director; Mark Kittrell, City Attorney; Chief Karl L b and Chief Tony Allred, Fire Department; Troy Anderson, Building Official. Nick Norris, Planning Director June 17, 2025 Initiation of a text amendment to adopt the Urban Wildfire Interface (UWI) Fire Code adopted by the Utah Legislature and an Urban Wildfire Interface Zoning Overlay that would identify where the UWI code would apply. In coordination with the Fire Department and Building Services, the Planning Division is requesting that you initiate a text amendment to the city code that would adopt the version of the Urban Wildfire Interface Fire Code adopted by the Utah Legislature and adopt a zoning overlay that will indicate on the zoning map where the UWI code would apply. The map proposed by the Fire Department is attached. The code would apply to the foothill areas, along stream and river corridors, and next to other natural areas in the Northwest Quadrant and north of the Salt Lake International Airport. The proposal will go through the typical public engagement process, with a minimum of 45-days public input period with notice to all recognized organizations and the division’s email distribution list. It is anticipated that the planning commission will hold a public hearing in late summer, and the item will then be transmitted to the City Council for a decision. Utah Code adopted legislation that goes into effect on January 1, 2026 and requires cities to adopt the UWI code by that date. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is not to initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made to not initiate the petition. Please contact me at 801-535-6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. ______________________________________ _________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date This page has intentionally been left blank Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Michael Sanders, Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE: FISCAL YEAR 2026 BUDGET AMENDEMNT No.2 MOTION 1 – Adopt remaining items and close the budget amendment. I move that the Council 1. Adjust item A3 – Elected Officials Transition Costs from $45,000 to $14,440 2. Adopt item A3 and the remaining items in the budget amendment as proposed by the Administration, including the Scrivenor’s error correction on item G2 - VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department; and 3. Close the budget amendment. *Note the original budgeted amount for item A-3 accounted for transition services for up to three council districts. As of the printing of this motion sheet it appears that only one council district will need transition services. **Note that on October 21st, 2025, the Council adopted items A2, A6, and A11. ***Note that on October 23rd, 2025, the Council Office was made aware of a Scrivenor’s error which has been corrected. Item G2 VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department has been updated from $596,025.60 to $414,061.69. MOTION 2 – Not adopt the remaining items and close the budget amendment I move that the Council 1. Not adopt the remaining items in the budget amendment as proposed by the Administration; and 2. Close the budget amendment. MOTION 3 – Defer action to a future Council Meeting I move that the Council continue discussion on this item and defer action to a future council meeting. MOTION 4 - Potential Legislative Intent I move that the Council adopt a legislative intent as follows “It is the Council’s intent to request the Administration to develop a formal policy which clearly defines when and how private donations should be accepted for CIP projects. It is the Council's desire that said policy include evaluation criteria and approval procedures. Ongoing maintenance of the asset(s) purchased or constructed with said donation should be considered in relation to its benefit(s).” COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Austin Kimmel, Kira Luke, Allison Rowland, Sylvia Richards, Michael Sanders, and Kate Werrett DATE:November 18, 2025 RE: Follow Up: FY 2026 Budget Amendment #2 NEW INFORMATION The Council received a briefing on this proposal during the October 07, 2025 Work Session. Council Staff gave an overview on items A-1 – A-11. During the briefing, the Council took straw polls on the following: A-2 National League of Cities Summit Costs A-6 Modification of an Appointed Position in the Police Department A-11 Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Results from all straw polls indicated favorable support. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Budget Amendment #2 includes 34 proposed amendments, including $71,326,282 in revenues and $137,008,677 in expenditures, including $913,000 from the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in 15 funds and adds 4.0 FTE’s. One is related to a proposed reclassification in Police and three pertain to the Utah Office of Victims of Crime grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. With the adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will be 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. If the items are adopted as proposed, then Fund Balance would be $1,498,933 below the 13% minimum target. As indicated by the Administration, a revenue update and projection will be provided with Budget Amendment #3. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. Updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages can be found on the table on page 2 of this report. STRAW POLL REQUESTS The Administration has requested straw polls for the following items: 1.A-2 National League of Cities Summit Costs 2.A-6 Modification of an Appointed Position in the Police Department CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: October 7, 2025 Set Date: October 7, 2025 Public Hearing: Oct. 21, 2025 Potential Action: Nov. 18, 2025 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 Page | 3 Updated Fund Balance Chart The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. Page | 4 ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant. (General Fund One-time $350,000) This one-time allocation from Fund Balance would sustain current service levels and programming for three middle school programs—in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park—after the loss of the Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant, from the State Department of Workforce Services (DWS), for students in grades 7 and 8. The Division has received the grant for the past nine years (three funding cycles) but did not this year because statewide allocations from the Federal government dropped and DWS shifted its priority to rural areas. The $350,000 amount also would ensure that the School-Age Quality (SAQ) grant, which funds Youth & Family programs for elementary school children, will remain in compliance with Child Care Licensing standards. The loss of the TAP grant represents $1,008,000 of City’s program funding across the typical three-year cycle. In response, the Division has reviewed its allocations and streamlined programs and processes. The Division’s strategic plan, which will reflect these funding challenges, will be ready this fall. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs (General Fund One-time $300,000) The Administration is requesting an additional $300,000 from Fund Balance to cover costs associated with hosting the National League of Cities (NLC) annual Cities Summit this November. Those costs include services related to conference contractual obligations, transportation, venue rental, catering, entertainment, printing, and more. The requested funding is in addition to the $250,000 allocated by the Council as part of Budget Amendment No. 5 in FY25 and the $250,000 approved in the City's FY26 budget. The Administration continues to fundraise to offset conference costs to the City with a goal of raising $250,000. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs (General Fund One-time $45,000) The Administration is requesting $45,000 from Fund Balance to fund transition expenses for elected officials. City Code 2.03.030 requires that, during an election year, the City consider appropriating funds through the annual budget process or a budget amendment to support the transition of a newly elected mayor or council members. For the 2025 municipal election, up to three councilors may require transition funding. The estimated cost for salaries and benefits over eight pay periods is $14,440 per Council Member, totaling $43,320. An additional $1,680 is requested for device purchase(s). Any further device costs would be coordinated through the IMS Interservice Fund. These costs are consistent with current City Council compensation. This item could be held and the amount adjusted based on the outcome of the election to minimize the impact on Fund Balance. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South (CIP Fund – One-time $722,250 and Impact Fees – One-time $232,470) As part of the FY2026 CIP review, Council issued the following CIP Legislative Intent: “I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians ( CIP Project # 25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” In response to the Legislative Intent, the Administration is requesting $954,720 from the following funding appropriations: -Park Impact Fees: $232,470 -Rescope of FY2024 CIP Complete Streets Funding: $351,000 -FY2025 CIP Irrigation System Replacement Funding: $371,250. NOTE: the 300 South to 400 South blocks were included in the approved FY2025 CIP application, and this reappropriation extends the irrigation replacement to 500 South. This funding will fully fund the $954,720 request included in CIP Project #25. The separate CIP application requesting public art for this area is not included in this proposed funding. If approved, construction will occur in 2026 or 2027. Page | 5 A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police (General Fund – Ongoing $0) The Administration is requesting a modification to an appointed position in the Police Department. Specifically, the proposal updates the title of the Communications Administrative Director to Civilian Chief of Staff. Additionally, the job description will be updated. The Civilian Chief of Staff is described as an appointed, at-will position that supports the Chief of Police in advancing department goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. The role provides non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance departmental performance. For a full job description, please see Attachment 2. This proposal makes changes only to the title in the Compensation Plan and the job description. The position will remain classified at Grade A3, with a salary range of $110,000 to $250,000. No one-time or ongoing funds are being requested. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs (General Fund – ongoing $0) The Administration is proposing to reclassify the Internal Affairs Director into two new FTE’s. The new positions are as follows: (1)Communications Coordinator – Social Media Content a. This position will play a key role in enhancing the visibility, transparency, and community engagement efforts of the Department. This position will be responsible for creating, managing, and distributing engaging multimedia content across various social media platforms. The ideal candidate would be a skilled storyteller who can highlight the department’s mission, daily activities, community outreach, and public safety initiatives through compelling video, photography, and written content. (2)Communications Coordinator – Communications Specialist a. This position will support the Department's internal and external communication efforts by developing content, creating materials, and assisting the Public Information Officer (PIO) staff. They will play a key role in ensuring timely, accurate, and consistent communication to department staff, city leadership, the media, and the public. Both positions are proposed to be classified at Grade E25, with a salary range of $58,013 - $100,232. No one- time or ongoing funds are being requested. These positions will be funded through the payroll savings from the elimination of the Internal Affairs Director, which was classified at Grade A3, with a salary range of $110,000 to $250,000. The positions will report to the proposed Civilian Chief of Staff. The duties of the internal affairs director will be assumed by the Internal Affairs Lieutenant who will report to a Deputy Chief. For a full description of the current Internal Affairs Director’s duties, please see Attachment 3. The Administration reports that this change will streamline the Internal Affairs process and be in alignment with an updated Personnel Complaints policy. The department is also currently evaluating the possible need for an audit/policy adherence position similar to an inspector general. The Administration is requesting a straw poll which, if in the affirmative, would allow for early advertisement of the requested positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP (CIP Fund – One-time $180,000) In accordance with the relevant donation and funding agreements, the Inland Port has provided $180,000 to the City to support the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This marks the second contribution from Inland Port funds toward this initiative. Subject to future actions under the applicable agreements, additional funding may be available in subsequent years. If received, future funds will be used to support the system’s expansion and ongoing operational costs, such as software licenses, maintenance, and repairs. Page | 5 Page | 6 A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP (CIP Fund – One-time $70,000) To help address ongoing street racing issues in front of their facility, Airgas has provided $70,000 to the City for street modifications. These funds must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. The total cost for installing two speed tables is $115,365. The remaining balance will be covered using either Livable Streets Quick Action funds or Vision Zero funds. The Administration has previously partnered with other businesses to install similar speed tables on Ninigret Drive, which have proven effective in deterring street racing. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment (Government Immunity Fund - Ongoing $94,791) The Administration is requesting $94,791 to fund increased insurance premium costs for the Take-Home Vehicle Program. When the FY25 budget was adopted, $200,000 was appropriated based on a December 2024 estimate. However, due to losses incurred between the estimate and the July 1 renewal, the actual premium increased to $294,791. The proposed allocation will fund the difference. Additionally, this will represent an ongoing cost to the Government Immunity Fund. There may be continued increases to the premium, however, without actual data, it’s difficult to confirm whether there will be a continued increase, but it is dependent on the necessary use of the policy. In Fiscal Year 2027 the policy will be re-evaluated. Safety programs are being implemented throughout the City to mitigate the risk of accidents relating to take home city vehicles. A-10: CBIA-25 Budget (Misc. Special Revenue Fund - Ongoing $2,500,000) In April 2025, the Council adopted an ordinance re-establishing the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional three-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budgeting process. The Administration requests $2.5 million to support the special assessment in its first year. The total amount recognizes both the estimated revenue and expenses based on what the City has raised since the establishment of CBIA-25. Most of these funds will be paid to the contractor responsible for economic promotion. Additionally, $151,200 will be allocated for the City’s administrative fee. $185,630 will be held in a reserve account. A-11: Assistance for Airport Federal Partners Due to Government Shutdown (Airport Fund One- time $100,000) Due to the federal government shutdown that began on October 1st, the Administration is requesting authorization to use $100,000 in existing Airport funds to purchase food, household supplies, and gas cards to support Transportation Security Administration (TSA) personnel at the airport. These employees are expected to continue working without pay during the shutdown. The Council may recall a similar request made in 2019, when assistance was also provided to support our TSA partners. With the recent expansion of the airport and an increase in passenger traffic at security checkpoints, the need for support is even greater. Based on guidance from legal counsel, the Administration is seeking City Council approval and endorsement of using existing funds in this way; no new funds are being requested. Page | 7 Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources None Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources None Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward (General Fund One-time $168,000) The Department of Economic Development (DED) requests that the remaining Construction Mitigation Fund balance of $168,000 be carried from FY25 Budget Amendment #5 to FY26. The Council allocated $270,000 as part of Budget Amendment #5 in FY25, and DED deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the end of FY25. The remaining $168,000 is anticipated to support 56 additional grants of $3000 to qualifying businesses impacted by specific construction sites. The Construction Mitigation Grant Program aims to help retain businesses during critical and necessary infrastructure upgrades. As part of FY26, the Council approved $350,000 for the program. This $168,000 amount would be in addition to the previous allocation. D-2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget (IMS Fund One-time $159,414) IMS is requesting to use $159,414 to bring 22 positions within cybersecurity, system engineering, project management, data privacy, and directors of technology services up to the market rate for FY26, as recommended in the 2025 Citizens’ Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) report. The allocation is proposed to come from IMS's fund balance. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward (IMS Fund One-time $2,241,88) IMS has requested to carry forward $2,241,881 from their FY25 budget to cover expenses and contracts that were funded but not fully paid in FY25. These include office equipment and software expenses where the transaction timing did not align with the City's fiscal year. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office (Ongoing $50,000) The ongoing expense has been moved from the Mayor's Office to IMS to reflect IMS's management of contracts with language access service providers and translation assistance. The Mayor's Office decrease was reflected in the FY26 budget, but the corresponding increase was omitted. This amendment corrects that omission. No decrease or disruption in translation service access is anticipated. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward. (Golf Fund – One-time $957,404) This is a budget carry-forward to pay outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY25 and will be paid in FY26. Rather than representing a single project amount, the total reflects equipment purchases totaling $437,666 (mostly related to care for the greens and surrounding areas) plus $519,476 in facility improvements and repairs. The four largest individual expenses are: Bonneville Range Fence $158,435 Forest Dale Roof $131,430 Mountain Dell Stairs $123,971 Forest Dale Simulators $105,900 TOTAL $519,476 Page | 8 D-6: Green Bike Expansion (CIP Fund – One-time $608,290) UDOT has awarded the City $608,290 in federal funding to support the expansion of the Green Bike Program. The City is required to provide a local match of $44,172. This funding will support the addition of approximately nine new Green Bike stations, which will include bicycles. The UDOT funds are currently held in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund and must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP Fund One-time $6,355,027) This item accounts for interest revenue on proceeds that accumulated from July 2024-July 2025. The revenue was generated by unspent proceeds from multiple bond issuances, including three issuances of the Streets Reconstruction General Obligation Bonds (2020-2022), the October 2022 issuance of the Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, and the October 2023 Parks General Obligation Bonds. This amendment adjusts the CIP budget to reflect the actual amounts available. Interest revenue from bonds is allocated to the same projects the bonds were originally approved for. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward (Fleet Fund One-time $13,202,498) This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles and equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. Council Members may recall that during Budget Amendment No. 5, the Council authorized $5 million in Funding Our Future monies for vehicle replacements to avoid price increases due to anticipated tariffs. According to Fleet, the order was placed near the end of FY25 and will be arriving in the coming months. The majority of the $13 million was allocated to purchase vehicles that were ordered in 2025. There is a natural lead time on most vehicles, and Fleet is currently within the normal scope of those lead times. There are about 7 vehicles that were ordered prior to 2025, but the delay in delivery is not due to supply chain issues. These are fire engines that always have at least a few years in lead times due to the nature of the vehicle and the customization required. D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services (CIP Fund – One-time $414,753) The Administration is requesting the transfer of $414,753.24 from the holding account to CIP to fund two City Hall physical security improvement projects. These funds are part of the $586,867 allocated to the holding account through FY2023 Budget Amendment #5. The requested funding will support the following projects: 1.Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project – Cultural Landscape Report and Implementation Design Total: $380,000 •Cultural Landscape Report – $80,000 The Use and Conservancy Board provided Mayor Mendenhall a recommendation to perform a Cultural Landscape Report, estimated to cost $80,000. The report will ensure that any proposed security enhancements are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. •Project Implementation Design Phase – $300,000 The design plans will integrate vehicle ramming mitigation measures into Washington Square’s aesthetic and culturally significant layout. 2.Wireless Door Release System Total: $34,753.24 Several departments have requested wireless door release systems. The system will allow employees to remotely unlock secured doors via a computer and/or phone application. The intent is to reduce face-to- face interactions in unpredictable situations. The wireless door release system will increase employee safety and reduce confrontational incidents. Page | 8 Page | 9 D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward (Water Fund One-time $66,849,851, Sewer Fund one-time $12,083,142, Storm Water Fund one-time $7,349,551, Street Lighting Fund one-time $1,327,234) The request also includes funding associated with the Department’s Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs), Series 2025B, for which the Council adopted a parameters resolution for during its Sept. 2 formal meeting. As a reminder, the BANs are intended to finance the acquisition of property for the department’s future campus. This housekeeping budget amendment for the Department of Public Utilities would carry forward funding for items from the FY25 budget. These items include grant proceeds, capital purchases, and projects that were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed by the end of FY25. The request also includes funding associated with the department's Bond Anticipation Notes (BANs), Series 2025B, for which the Council adopted a parameters resolution during its Sept. 2 formal meeting. The BANs are intended to finance the acquisition of property for the department's future campus. Public Utilities indicated that the $50 million BANs and associated issuance costs will initially be fully accounted for in the department's Water Fund, which explains the high total amount in the Water Fund. The department intends to evaluate the allocation of these funds to determine the appropriate distribution across other funds. Upon a clear definition of the allocation, Public Utilities will prepare the necessary budget changes in a future budget amendment or in its FY27 budget. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract. (General Fund One-time, -$301,500 and +$301,500 (net $0)). Replacement funding for the City’s Volunteers of America (VOA) contract was inadvertently left out of the FY26 budget deliberations when the City’s State Mitigation Grant funding was shifted to PD-related items for FY26. The Housing Stability Division in CAN (the Community and Neighborhoods Department) used $100,500 of FY25 Funding Our Future funds to pay this contract for the first three months of FY26. The remainder of the amount needed to keep this item budget-neutral, $301,500, is proposed to come from not-yet-contracted FY26 Funding Our Future funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA contract pays for street outreach and the salary of a Safety and Community Liaison for the Homeless Resource Centers (HRCs). The Liaison conducts outreach to businesses and residents near the HRCs to address concerns related to homelessness. In future years, CAN proposes splitting this item into two separate contracts, one of $240,627 for VOA and the other of $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. This would facilitate shifting the Liaison position from VOA to Shelter the Homeless, which provides services (like maintaining building systems and security) that are more closely related to the core responsibilities of the Liaison. The Liaison’s coverage area would grow to include a half-mile radius around the HRCs, the Youth Resource Center, the YWCA, the Weigand Homeless Resource Center, and St. Vincent de Paul. CAN further requests that in the future this function be paid by the General Fund. Council Policy Question. Does the Council agree with the Administration’s proposal to shift $301,500 from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget to cover the FY26 VOA contract? D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward (Refuse Fund One-time $9,350,559) The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY25 to FY26. The majority of this amount (approximately $8.9 million) is for fleet vehicles for the Waste & Recycling Division. Broken out by division, $9,142,905 is for Sustainability’s Waste & Recycling Division and $207,654 for the Environment & Energy Division. Page | 10 D-13: CIP Housekeeping (CIP Fund – One-time $678,600 and $3,900,000) FY2025 Parks Impact Fees – Revenue and Expenditure Adjustment In the FY2025 Adopted Budget, Parks Impact Fee revenue was under reported by $678,600. While sufficient impact fees existed, the funds were not recognized as a revenue or expenditure in the Council Key Changes approved in June 2024; however, the funds were allocated in the August 2024 approval. This Budget Amendment increases the revenue by that amount to reflect the correct total. These funds have already been allocated to the Fairmont Park basketball court project. This amendment formally recognizes both the revenue and associated expenditure in the budget. FY25 Budget Amendment 3, Item A-4 – Fleet Block Property Sale: Infrastructure Development Condition Two corrections are needed for how funds from the Fleet Block property sale were budgeted in FY2025: 1. The funds should have been transferred from the CIP Surplus Land Fund (Fund 3039) to the CIP General Fund (Fund 3000). 2. The expenditure was incorrectly treated as a project rescope rather than a new appropriation from the Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment corrects both issues by transferring the funds appropriately and establishing the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion (Misc Grants – One-time $608,290) UDOT has awarded the City $608,290 in federal funding to support the expansion of the Green Bike Program. The City is required to provide a local match of $44,172. This funding will support the addition of approximately nine new Green Bike stations, which will include bicycles. The UDOT funds are currently held in the Miscellaneous Grants Fund and must be transferred to CIP for expenditure. E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award. (Misc Grants – One-time $5,284) CAN was notified recently of an error in HUD’s calculation of 2023 and 2024 HOME-ARP awards. The City did not include funding contingencies in the HOME-ARP awards at the time because no change was anticipated in the amount. The Department proposes allocating this additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, which received the highest score in this category in the category of Tenant-Based Rental Assistance. E-3. Increased HUD HOPWA Award. (Misc Grants – One-time $26,832) CAN was notified recently that Salt Lake City’s FY26 HOPWA award is $26,832 over what was projected earlier. Per the contingencies approved in the Department’s estimated award amount, the Division of Housing Stability will receive an additional $804 for administration of these funds. Then, since the two HOPWA funding recipients both received more than their requested amounts for FY26, the Division proposes the remaining $26,028 be allocated to the highest-scoring of the two awardees, Utah Community Action. The organization has confirmed that the additional funds will allow them to serve approximately five more households with short- term rent or mortgage assistance, utility assistance, and/or supportive services. Section F: Donations None Section G: Council Consent Agenda – Grant Awards G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor' s Office (Misc Grants – One-time $596,025) The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) Fully funding an existing victim advocate. 2) The Prosecutor's office will hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims. 4) Funding for travel and training for staff. 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, Page | 11 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license to track statistics. The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The public hearing was held April 15, 2025. G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department (Misc Grants – One-time $256,518) The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is benefits for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. The public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (Misc Grants – One-time $579,834) This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City Police Department K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to the task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. The public hearing was held August 13, 2024. G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) (Misc Grants – One-time $9,029) Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. The public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025. G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 (Misc Grants – One-time $6,500) The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. The public hearing was held July 8, 2025. G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services (Misc Grants – One- time $1,368,000) Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. A public hearing was held May 20, 2025. G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant (Misc Grants – One-time $33,900) The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research-based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025. Section I: Council Added Items None Page | 12 ATTACHMENTS 1. New Ongoing Costs to the General Fund 2. Civilian Chief of Staff Job Description 3. Internal Affairs Director Job Description ACRONYMS BEMS – Bureau of Emergency Service CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CAN – Department of Community & Neighborhoods FTE – Full time Employee / Equivalent FY – Fiscal Year HOME – ARP – The HOME Investment Partnerships American Rescue Plan Program HOPWA – Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS HUD – Housing & Urban Development GF – General Fund IMS – Information Management Services OST – Out of School Time SFSP –Summer Food Service Program VOCA – Victims of Crime Act VSTRACKING – Victim Services Tracking Software YAGI – Youth Advocacy Grant Initiative Page | 12 Page | 13 Attachment 1: New Ongoing Costs to the General Fund Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Note that some items in the table below are partially or fully funded by grants. If a grant continues to be awarded to the City in future years, then there may not be a cost to the General Fund but grant funding is not guaranteed year-over-year. Budget Amendment Item Potential Cost to FY2026 Annual Budget Full Time Employ ee (FTEs) Notes BAM#2 D-3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward $159,414 Ongoing -0-CCAC recommended funding for multiple departments to address compensation for positions lagging behind market rate. Changes & funding weren’t included in annual budget. D-4 Language Access Transfer from Mayor’s Office $50,000 Ongoing -0- Contract language access services funding was inadvertently left out of IMS budget when it was transferred from Mayor’s to IMS during the annual budget. TOTAL $209,414 Page | 14 Attachment 2: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Description Page | 14 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 15 Page | 16 Page | 16 Page | 17 Attachment 3: Internal Affairs Director Job Description Page | 18 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/30/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/30/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/30/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/30/2025 Subject: FY 2026 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: An item was added for the Airport to provide assistance to federal partners impacted by the federal government shutdown Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Budget Impact: See attached documentation Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fifteen (15) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $137,008,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modi fied based on the decisions of the Council. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 1 of 4 Overview Overview Inactive No View As Of 09/11/2025 Date of Last Change 06/20/2025 11:05:29.781 PM Job Profile Name Communications Coordinator Job Code 002520 Include Job Code in Name No Job Profile Summary Performs full professional level communications and promotional work involved in preparing, implementing, and presenting a variety of departmental informational campaigns, communications, and knowledge-based materials for city operations. Works closely with senior executives to establish organizational messages and keep staff informed of key work initiatives and developments. Coordinates internal employee communications programs, including employee newsletters, brochures, policies and procedures manuals, and related communications. Creates, coordinates, and oversees the distribution and delivery of information across divisions. TYPICAL DUTIES: Participates in planning, developing, and implementing marketing strategies and employee engagement plans, projects, or programs. Ensures all plans are in alignment with the department’s overall mission and strategic plan. • Research, plan, draft, design, edit, and distribute various materials, including fact sheets, brochures, news articles, annual reports, and presentations. • Develops comprehensive timelines for projects and events, implements agreed upon communications strategy within budget. • Synthesizes complicated matters and data into an understandable context and follows through on inquiries, research requests, and drafting messages for approval.  • Disseminates information pertinent to employees through newsletters, bulletins, email, presentations, print, or other communication techniques to reach employees out in the field.  • Builds and coordinates social media output by creating communications for internal and external audiences and distributing information and materials for social media websites. • Supports emergency communication efforts and media management during a crisis.• Monitors and evaluates communication effectiveness to ensure employees utilize the information provided.• Archives and maintains department communications assets and publishing content on internal and external department websites. • May supervisor part time employees.• Perform other duties as assigned.• MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in English, Marketing, Communications, or a closely related field plus two to four years of professional-level experience performing communications, marketing, and/or • Job Description 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 2 of 4 public relations. Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year-for-year basis. Creative ability to devise effective communication strategies.• Knowledge and familiarity with information technology, basic design, and digital editing is essential.• Excellent writing, editing, and proofreading skills.• Effective oral and written communication skills; excellent interpersonal skills.• Ability to resolve highly complex issues; develop and communicate new policies and procedures.• Ability to work effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and at various levels of the organization.• WORKING CONDITIONS: Generally comfortable working conditions requiring light physical effort.  Intermittent sitting, standing, and walking.  May require frequent travel between office and department or meeting location. • Considerable exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and job requirements.• The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job.  They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified.  All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE $   -   $ DEPARTMENT XX Job Title Default Restrict to Country Management Level Individual Contributor Job Family Employee Marketing & Communications Specialist Job Classifications 600 - (Professional 600) PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Work Shift Required No Public Job Yes Referral Payment Plan 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 3 of 4 Characteristics Difficulty to Fill Critical Job No Compensation Compensation Grade E25 Compensation Grade Profile Impacted Eligibility Rules Business Process History Business Process History Business Process Effective Date Initiated On Completed On Status Edit Job Profile: Communications Coordinator 10/07/2024 10/07/2024 10:48:10 AM 10/07/2024 10:55:27 AM Successfully Completed Qualifications Certifications Certification Required Country Certification (Predefined)Certification (Not Predefined)Issuer (Not Predefined) Skills Skill Attributes Required Skill Skill Level Competencies Competencies from Other Sources Required Competency Target Rating Source Source Type Education Education Required Degree Field of Study Languages Languages 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 4 of 4 Required Language Ability Proficiency Responsibilities Responsibilities Required Responsibility Training Training Required Training Training Type Description Work Experience Work Experience Required Work Experience Experience Level Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Derived Logic Pay Pay Rate Type Pay Rate Types Country Pay Rate Type United States of America Salary Job Exempt Job Exempt Country / Country Region Job Exempt United States of America Yes Workers' Compensation Code Worker's Compensation Codes Workers' Compensation Code Country Country Region Location 3 - Clerical (United States of America)United States of America This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170,000 - $425,000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130,000 - $270,000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110,000 - $250,000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Communications Administrative DirectorCivilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. * Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 30, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $0.00 $913,000.00 IMS FUND 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 GOLF FUND 0.00 957,404.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 13,202,498.00 REFUSE FUND 0.00 9,350,559.00 WATER FUND 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 SEWER FUND 0.00 12,083,142.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 STREET LIGHTING FUND 0.00 1,327,234.00 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 0.00 94,791.00 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL SERV FUND 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 100,000.00 IMPACT FEES FUND 0.00 232,470.00 CIP FUND 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 TOTAL $71,326,282.76 $137,008,677.94 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments A revenue update and projection will be provided with the next budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will adjust to 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 14,931,953$ 78,854,192$ 93,786,145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%25.42%17.38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57% 29.74% 30.99% 25.42% 17.38% 18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (27,392,780) (27,392,780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (358,000) (358,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) (913,000) (913,000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 50,190,412 65,122,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32% 18.82% 19.52% 25.42% 11.06% 12.71% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,721,525 512,471,524 General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fifteen (15) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $137,008,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170,000 - $425,000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130,000 - $270,000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110,000 - $250,000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Civilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. * Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Second amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2025. ___________________________ Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed ___________________________ Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: ________________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2025. Published: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved as to Form /s/Jaysen Oldroyd 09/2/2025 Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF 0.00 350,000.00 One-time - 2 National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF 0.00 300,000.00 One-time - 3 Elected Officials Transition Costs GF 0.00 45,000.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (51,000.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (300,000.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (371,250.00)One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S CIP 0.00 722,250.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Unallocated Park Impact Fees Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 One-time - 5 Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing - 6 Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 1.00 7 Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP 180,000.00 180,000.00 One-time - 8 Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP 70,000.00 70,000.00 One-time - 9 Take-home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 Ongoing - 10 CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Ongoing - 11 Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Airport 0.00 100,000.00 One-time - 1 Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF 0.00 168,000.00 One-time - 2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS 0.00 159,414.00 One-time - 3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS 0.00 2,241,881.18 One-time - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office IMS 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 5 Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf 0.00 957,404.00 One-time - 6 Green Bike Expansion CIP 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 7 Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP 6,355,027.04 6,355,027.04 One-time - 8 Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 One-time - 9 CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP 414,753.00 414,753.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 (301,500.00)One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 301,500.00 One-time - 12 Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 678,600.00 678,600.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 0.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 3,900,000.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 2 Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants 5,284.00 5,284.00 One-time - 3 Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants 26,832.00 26,832.00 One-time - Consent Agenda 1 VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants 596,025.60 596,025.60 Ongoing 3.00 2 VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants 256,518.12 256,518.12 Ongoing - 3 Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants 579,834.00 579,834.00 Ongoing - 4 Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS)Misc Grants 9,029.00 9,029.00 One-time - 5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants 6,500.00 6,500.00 One-time - 6 School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce ServicesMisc Grants 1,368,000.00 1,368,000.00 Ongoing - 7 Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants 33,900.00 33,900.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 137,008,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2: General Fund GF 0.00 913,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 IMS Fund IMS 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 0.00 0.00 3.00 Golf Fund Golf 0.00 957,404.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Fund Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 0.00 0.00 - Water Fund Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 0.00 0.00 - Sewer Fund Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 0.00 0.00 - Street Lighting Fund Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 0.00 0.00 - Governmental Immunity Fund Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 0.00 0.00 - Miscellaneous Special Service Fund Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Airport Fund Airport 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 0.00 0.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 137,008,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 53,881,754.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 27,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 - 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 43,102,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 - - - 2,248,700,014.83 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952 358,000.00 913,000.00 465,630,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 64,514,224.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 100,000.00 477,054,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 36,937,750.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 45,504,229.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 38,707,891.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 27,527,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 358,000.00 137,008,677.94 - - - 2,049,824,809.31 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 - Retransmittal #1 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF One-time $350,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Liz Rich For questions, please include Liz Rich, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker The Community and Neighborhood Department is requesting $350,000 for the Youth and Family (YF) Division to sustain current service levels and programming following the loss of the DWS Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant with a federal funding source. Salt Lake City previously received the TAP grant for three funding cycles (nine years) but was not awarded funding this year due to reduced statewide allocations and a shift in priority toward rural communities. Had it been awarded, the three-year TAP grant would have provided $1,008,000 to operate middle school programs across the city. This shortfall is compounded by the expiration of ARPA funds that once supported summer grants, as well as licensing requirements that mandate low staff-to-student ratios and the need to offer competitive wages for frontline staff. To maintain services, YF has strategically reviewed general fund allocations and streamlined programs and processes. However, a $350,000 funding gap remains, which impacts programming in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park. Youth & Family has already taken significant steps to maximize existing resources, aligning with its strategic plan. Once that plan is finalized this fall, YF will pursue new public and private funding opportunities. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF One-time $300,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nikola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola and Mary Beth Thompson As the City prepares to host the National League of Cities annual Cities Summit this November the administration is requesting an additional $300,000 to be added to the Council funds allocated in the annual budget. Ahead of the conference the City must pay for services related to conference contractual obligations, including transportation, venue rental, event catering, entertainment, printing, and more. This additional funding will allow the City to finalize all contractually required elements of the conference in the lead up to November while the Administration continues to work on raising sponsorship money for the event, which is anticipated to be ongoing into November. Sponsorship has a goal to raise $250,00 to offset conference costs to the City. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite finalization of conference plans. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs GF One-time $45,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman Amending the budget to include $45,000 for Transition expenses of Elected Officials pursuant to City Code 2.03.030 and the upcoming 2025 Municipal Election. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South CIP One-time ($51,000.00) CIP One-time ($300,000.00) CIP One-time ($371,250.00) Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 CIP One-time $722,250.00 Impact Fees One-time $232,470.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Ben Luedtke For questions, please include Ben Luedtke, Mike Atkinson and Mary Beth Thompson In response to the Council’s legislative intent from August 19 (copied below), the Administration is proposing to fully fund the $954,720 project from a mix of funding sources as listed below: • $232,470 of parks impact fees which would maximize the eligible portion of the project for 56 new trees, new median island noses / extensions, ADA access / crosswalks, and pollinator gardens, four benches, and public art. • $351,000 rescope of FY2024 CIP complete streets appropriation. These funds are available because the Virginia Street reconstruction project is finishing under budget and a State Street project that had grant funding pulled resulting in the local matching funds being made available for other complete street projects. The funds would be used for removing curb, adding eight inch curb, asphalt tie ins on four islands, demolition, erosion control, earthwork, and mobilization. • Rescope of $371,250 the $500,000 FY2025 CIP appropriation for adapting irrigation systems for irrigation system replacement, tree specific watering, sod removal, one-inch new topsoil, and at least 50% new sod for four islands, of which none has been expended. Note that the original appropriation included the medians from 300 South – 400 South but not from 400 South – 500 South. Legislative Intent: Budget Amendment Addressing Improvements to the Curb, Gutter, and Irrigation of the 1200 East Medians “I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians (CIP Project #25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” Project Description from the FY2026 CIP Funding Log: East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South and 400- 500 South) A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Redd For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Communications Administrative Director Grade A03 Requested Position Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Grade A03 Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Further Job Description information is included as an attachment in the amendment packet. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Internal Affairs Director Grade A03 (1) FTE Requested Position(s): Communications Coordinator - Social Media Content Grade E25 1 FTE Communications Coordinator - Communications Specialist Grade E25 1 FTE No additional funding is being requested. The Department would request a straw poll to allow for advertisement of the requested positions. Further Job Description information is included in the attachments in the amendment packet A straw poll is being requested on this item to expedite the recruitment of these positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $180,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City has received a from the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds were received and now need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for this afore mentioned expenditure. A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $70,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City received a $70,000 from Airgas for street modifications in front of their facility. Airgas desires to eliminate street racing events on 700 South. Airgas desires to have two speed tables installed near their Facility. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for the project. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt. Immunity One-time $94,791.00 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman and Lauree Roberts The request submitted with the annual budget was in anticipation of a proposed policy premium cost ($200,000); however, due to losses incurred between the time of the estimate (Dec 2024) and the July 1 decision deadline, the premium cost increased to $294,791. The difference in proposed cost to actual cost will be covered by the Government Immunity Fund while the budget amendment process proceeds. Since the allocation and budgetary approval was for a lesser amount, this serves as a request to increase the allocation considered for premium payment. A-10: CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Rev One-time $2,500,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jocob Maxwell / Lorena Riffo-Jenson For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson CBIA-25 - On April 1, 2025, the City Council adopted to re-establish the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional 3-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budget. As part of the adoption/allocation, $151,200 for the City's needs is to be transferred as "General Fund Expense" for the City's Administrative Fee. Also, $185,630 would need to be held in a reserve account. A-11: Airport Assistance for Federal Partners Due to the Government Shutdown Airport One-time $100,000.00 Department: Airport Prepared By: Brian Butler For questions, please include Brian Butler, Shaun A nderson and Lorin Rollins The federal government will most likely shut down on October 1st. When a similar federal shutdown happened in 2019, the Airport administration aided its federal partners by providing food, household goods, and some gas cards so they could continue to come to work even though they weren't getting paid. The Airport now has more passengers going through the security checkpoint than ever before and is trying to not just support its federal partners but also do its best to limit the impact this federal shutdown will have to passengers traveling through the Airport. As such, the Airport administration would like to do something like what was done in 2019, and based on legal counsel's opinion, would like to get City Council approval and support for the necessary funding. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF One-time $168,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jacob Maxwell For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson In FY 2025, budget amendment #5, the City Council allocated $270,000 in Construction Mitigation Funds to continue supporting the eligible businesses within the local community that would be impacted by the major road reconstruction projects. From mid- May and all of June 2025, the Department of Economic Development (DED) deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the close of FY 2025. DED would like to request that the remaining $168,000 be carried forward into FY 2026, which amounts to 56 additional $3,000 grants to businesses. The construction projects that began in FY 2025 and are still impacting businesses in FY 2026 include: Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 • 2100 South (700 E – 1100 E) - ongoing • 2100 South Median (1100 E – 1300 E) – began spring 2025 • 1300 East (2100 S to 3300 S) - began spring 2025 • 300 West Bike Lane (900 S to 300 S) - began spring 2025 This item was highlighted as part of the FY 2026 annual budget, with the intent to address this need via budget amendment and the carry over process. D-2: IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS One-Time $159,414.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley As part of the FY 2026 budget, the Citizen Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) recommended funding for multiple city departments to address compensation for positions lagging the market. IMS was impacted and additional funding was recommended. Due to the timing of the IMS budget process, this funding was not captured in the IMS budget. IMS, with the use of the IMS Fund Balance, is now requesting this budget to be accounted for as part of the FY 2026 annual budget. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS One-time $2,241,881.18 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting carry forward budget from FY 2025 to FY 2026 to cover contract encumbrances that were established during FY 2025 but not yet been fully paid. Without this carry forward amendment, the contract payments would need to be paid from the FY 2026 budget, which isn’t sufficient to cover these costs. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office IMS Ongoing $50,000.00 GF Ongoing $50,000.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting $50,000 for the language access transfers needed to operate contract language access services within the city. These funds were previously part of the Mayor’s Office budget. However, the total amount allocated for Language Access was reduced from the Mayor’s Office budget; $50,000 was moved to the Justice Court, and $50,000 was transferred to IMS. However, the increase was inadvertently omitted from the IMS budget, requiring this amendment to add it in for FY 2026. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf One-time $957,404.00 Department: Public Lands - Golf Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans and Bryce Lindeman The Public Lands Department is requesting $957,404 for the Golf Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY 2025 but will be paid in FY 2026. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 D-6: Green Bike Expansion CIP One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance - CIP Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Mike Atkinson This amendment will establish a budget in CIP for funds received from UDOT for the expansion of the Green Bike program. $608,290 was received for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. The funds are received in the Miscellaneous Grants fund and must be transferred to CIP for the above-mentioned purposes. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP One-time $6,355,027.04 Department: Finance - Treasurer Prepared By: Jared Jenkins / Jou Ying Su For questions, please include Marina Scott, Jared Jenkins and Jou Ying Su Over the past few years, unspent proceeds from various bond issuances have earned interest while being deposited with trustees. This amendment will adjust the budgets to include interest for the various issuances to reflect the actual proceeds available. Greater detail on each is contained below. General Obligation Bond Series 2020, was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2021, was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $20,600,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2022, was issued in September 2022 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $21,785,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B&C, were issued in October 2022 for the purpose of financing several capital projects throughout the City. The bonds were issued at a par amount of $64,225.000. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2023, was issued in August 2023 to fund improvements of City parks and trails. Par value of the issued bonds was $24,765,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet One-time $13,202,498.00 Department: Public Services – Fleet Prepared By: Julie Crookston / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Julie Crookston, Kimberly Schmelling and Obreaee Hardy This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles/equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP One-time $414,753.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro / Nate Kobs / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro, Nate Kobs and Kimberly Schmelling Public Services is requesting the release of $414,753.24 from the CIP holding account for physical security improvements at City Hall. These funds were allocated in Budget Amendment #5, of FY 2023, and were placed in a holding account. After the last releases of funds, in January and September, 2024, the current unallocated balance in the holding account stands at $586,867.21, from which the $414,753 will come. This latest release is intended to support two critical projects under the Internal Security Program. 1. Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project - Cultural Landscape (CL) Report + Implementation Design ($380,000): The Use and Conservancy Board has voted on and provided their recommendation to Mayor Mendenhall to conduct the Cultural Landscape Report. The cost of the CL report is estimated to be $80,000 and will provide a comprehensive analysis of the historical, cultural and design elements of Washington Square, ensuring that any proposed security improvements, particularly ramming mitigation implementations, are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. The report will serve as a critical foundation for the Project Design phase, estimated at $300,000, which will develop detailed plans for integrating vehicle ramming mitigation measur es while maintaining the Square's aesthetic and cultural significance. Both the CLR and Implementation Design will be completed by the same firm to ensure continuity. 2. Wireless Door Release Systems - City Hall ($34,753.24): Several departments within City Hall have submitted requests for wireless door release systems. The systems provide employees with the ability to remotely unlock secured doors using a handheld or desktop control device. By minimizing direct face-to-face interactions in potentially volatile situations, these systems significantly improve employee safety and reduce the risk of confrontational incidents. D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water One-time $66,849,851.00 Sewer One-time $12,083,142.00 Storm Water One-time $7,349,551.00 Street Lighting One-time $1,327,234.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Lisa Tarufelli For questions, please include Lisa Tarufelli, Laura Briefer and Mark Christensen The items included in this housekeeping budget amendment for Public Utilities are carry forwards from the FY 2025 budget. These include grant proceeds, capital purchases and projects which were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed (final purchase order or contract) before June 30, 2025. During the Fiscal Year 2026 budget preparation process, it was anticipated the procurement process for these items would be completed prior to year end, thus they were not re-budgeted in FY 2026. The Bond Anticipation Notes were not anticipated during the budget process and will be executed prior to the next budget amendment. Public Utilities staff have been directed to include this transaction as part of this amendment. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract GF One-time ($301,500.00) GF One-time $301,500.00 Department: CAN – Housing Stability Prepared By: Tony Milner Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker In FY 2025, $402,000 was budgeted for the Volunteers of America (VOA) through the State Mitigation Grant. Since the grant is now focused on PD-related budgets for FY 2026, the VOA budget was inadvertently excluded during the FY 2026 budget process. CAN is now requesting that the VOA be funded through the General Fund. Housing Stability was able to use FY 2025 funds to extend the VOA contract for three months into FY 2026. As a result, the FY 2026 request is $301,500 rather than the full $402,000. To keep this request budget neutral, CAN proposes reallocating existing , not yet contracted funds. Specifically, $301,500 from FY 2026 Housing FOF funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA funding is utilized for street outreach and to pay a staff salary for a Safety and Community Liaison for the resource centers. For this year, the Liaison has been reorganized and placed under the Shelter the Homeless organization. As such, for FY 2026, CAN is also proposing to split the funding into two separate contracts: $240,627 for VOA and $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse One-time $9,350,559.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Debbie Lyons For questions, please include Debbie Lyons The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required in order to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY 2025 into FY 2026. D-13: CIP Housekeeping CIP One-time $678,600.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson FY25 Key Changes - Parks Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditure – In FY 2025, this item was underfunded by $678,600. This Budget Amendment will increase the amount of Revenue by $678,600. These funds have already been allocated the Fairmont Park Basketball court. This amendment will formalize the budget. FY25 BA3 A-4 Fleet Block Property Sale - Infrastructure Development Condition – In FY 2025, this item was first, not properly transferred from CIP Surplus Land Fund 3039 to CIP General Fund 3000, and second, treated like a rescope rather than a new expenditure from Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment properly transfers the funds and establishes the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey. This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $608,290 for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. Salt Lake City will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed by UDOT. These funds will be used to build additional bike stations. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants One-time $5,284.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This item recognizes $5,284 in new HUD HOME-ARP funding. On April 30, 2025, the City was notified of an error in HUD’s calculation of HOME-ARP allocations. As a result, the City will receive an additional $5,284, which requires a budget amendment to recognize the new funding for FY26. For context, in 2023 and 2024 the City approved a $3,533,195 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) award. Those funds were allocated to development projects, Tenant -Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) programs, and administration activities. Because the full award amount was assumed at the time of Council approval, no funding contingencies were included. The Administration now proposes allocating the additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, the highest -scoring applicant in the TBRA category. E-3: Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants One-time $26,832.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This is a housekeeping item to recognize an increased HUD HOPWA award of $26,832. The amendment is overall budget neutral. This action increases the FY26 appropriated budget from $945,200 to $972,032 to reflect the additional HOPWA funds awarded to Salt Lake City, which exceeded the original budget projection. As a reminder, on April 21, 2025, through Resolution 11 of 2025, the City Council approved FY26 HOPWA subrecipient awards along with contingency plans for distributing any additional funding. The Administration will follow these Council-approved contingencies to allocate the $26,832 increase to designated programs and subrecipients. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #1 G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants $596,025.60 Department: Attorney’s Office - Prosecutor Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tina Orme The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) The grant will now fully fund an existing victim advocate whose time is currently grant funded at 63.75%. 2) The grant will allow the Prosecutor's office to hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims 4) Funding for travel and training for staff 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license. Funding for the 1st year is $293,152.80, and the 2nd year is $302,872.80 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 10 The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The Mental Health workshops are designated to assist victims of violent crimes by being a part of a safe open group discussion and are led by an LCSW every month on a different topic such as: Healthy relationships, making and keeping boundaries, Anxiety, Self Worth, and other topics that would assist the victim with information, resources and education. The emergency fund assists the victim to cover the cost of immediate needs such as the travel necessary for stability and safety, obtaining the necessities of life if the victim left home with just the clothes they had on, or if the victim needs childcare while attending court. Finally, the Victim Services Tracking (VSTracking) software keeps track of all the statistics that the grants require. It also the Victim Advocates notes following communication with the victims, their wants/needs and the resources that the office gives out. Public hearing was held April 15, 2025 G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants $256,518.12 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is fringe for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants $579,834.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held August 13, 2024 G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) Misc Grants $9,029.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Brittany Blair Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. Public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 – Retransmittal #1 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 11 G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants $6,500.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Koty Lopez The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide nutritious snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. Public hearing was held July 8, 2025 G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Misc Grants $1,368,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. Each year, the following amounts are allocated from the $456,000 being provided; $ 382,889.52 for Salaries and Fringe for existing positions, $3,120 for Communications, $20,000 for client services, $5,000 for snacks, $30,070.48 for Materials and Supplies, and $3,000 for Professional Fees and Contract Services and $11,920 . A public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants $33,900.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025 Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2,788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1,018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 $777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank Proposed Job Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Code: New FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Supervisor Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Executives Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Job Description TYPICAL DUTIES: • Manage the Police Chief’s priorities, aligning command staff and department initiatives with the agency’s strategic goals. • Oversee or facilitate the development and implementation of strategic plans, reform initiatives, and performance measurement systems. • Lead or coordinate administrative functions such as budgeting, human resources, policy review, and special projects. • Serve as a liaison between the department and city administration, community partners, and other stakeholders. • Support cultural change efforts, workforce development, and modernization initiatives. • Drive high-priority initiatives across divisions, ensuring timelines, impact, and accountability are met. • Research, write and edit, or assists in the research, writing and editing, of speeches for the Police Chief and others as requested. Acts as Public Information Officer when assigned as such by the Police Chief or designee. • Keep Police Chief and/or command staff advised regarding the coordination of information dissemination. Works with GRAMA coordinator and/or legal counsel to ensure consistency and uniformity in position statements, and in dealing with members of the media. • Counsel command staff on public relations protocols and implication of issues vital to the well being and best interests of the City and Police Department. • Responsible for the Police Department’s communication materials including the design and content of the Department’s web site and social media. • Research, write, prepare, edit and oversee publication of the informational brochures/flyers and a broad range of other publications. • Coordinate photography, interviews, statistics and other needed information. Develops and directs radio, television, film and newspaper advertising campaigns. Writes letters, speeches and presentations. • Serve as Public Information Officer when directed. • Serve as the Department’s contact for local, national and international media. Responds to requests for specialized information, coordinates interviews/release of information and performs research on behalf of the media. • Direct or manage on camera interviews. • Direct or manage media releases and public information announcements, coordinates news conferences and handles the media in emergency response situations. Promotes the Police Department through positive media exposure and directs or manages the Department’s spokesperson. • Proofread, edit and analyze City and Police Department documents before they become public domain (budget books, policy papers, etc.). • As directed, coordinates and directs press conferences arranged by the Chief or designee. • Coordinate responses to issues raised by the public and other stakeholders and works with the Mayor’s Office in this endeavor to ensure consistent reaction while tracking issues and responses. • Establish and maintain strong working relationships with internal bureaus and units as well as other departments within the city, county and state to promote collaboration, to include participating in monthly city communications coordination meetings acting as the police department’s representative. • Seek out, coordinate, and engage in all department outreach programs and community engagements to leverage involvement and face-to-face interactions on behalf of the Department. • Coordinate annual events such as the Fallen Officer Memorial, Awards Gala, and Police Week activities for the department, to include engaging key attendees, creating branding and programs, finalizing script, and working closely with involved committees. • Evaluate success and establish mechanisms for feedback through two-way communication channels to meet department goals, to include developing cross sector partnerships that allow for ongoing and substantive dialogues on community needs and vision. • Establish and maintain associations and contacts with national, state and local representatives to ensure the Department is properly represented within the industry and local community as well as with the public. • Manage designs, order, and update all public education and recruiting collateral in conjunction with CompStat assignments, outreach programs, and community engagement. • Oversee all daily press releases (Watch Logs, wanted persons, public warnings, media advisories, etc.) and confers with counsel on release of information. • Performs other duties as assigned. PREFERED QUALIFICATIONS: • Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Broadcast Media, English, Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Political Science or a related field. At least five years’ experience in journalism or public relations; experience in broadcast television and in management preferred. • Ability to interact effectively with police personnel, department heads, government and business leaders, and others in positions of authority and influence. • Demonstrated superior communications skills, including the ability to deal effectively with members of both broadcast and print media and to appear on behalf of the Chief, and Police Department on radio or broadcast television. • Preference may be given to applicants with local media experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: • Light physical effort. Mostly comfortable working positions, handling light weights, intermittent sitting, standing, and walking. • Frequent exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and the requirements of the job. The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified. All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. • Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE $ - $ DEPARTMENT XX Created on August 27, 2025 Created by Aubrey Garduno, HRBP This page has intentionally been left blank Current Position: Job Title: 0035504 Internal Affairs Administrative Director Job Code: 002525 FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Division Director Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: OFFICIALS_AND_ADMINISTRATORS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Management Analyst Base Comp: $164,750.83 ($187,946) Proposed: Communications Coordinator (Job Profile attached) (1) Social Media Content Creator (1) Communication Specialist This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/ 23/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/ 23/2025 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/ 23/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/ 23/2025 Subject: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 Additional Staff Contact: Greg Cleary, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Greg Cleary: greg.cleary@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913,000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fourteen (14) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $136,908,678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassication in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor ’s Oce.A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modied based on the decisions of the Council.Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?*Yes No Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: September 23, 2025 Chris Wharton, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #2 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Greg Cleary DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $0.00 $913,000.00 IMS FUND 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 GOLF FUND 0.00 957,404.00 FLEET FUND 0.00 13,202,498.00 REFUSE FUND 0.00 9,350,559.00 WATER FUND 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 SEWER FUND 0.00 12,083,142.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 STREET LIGHTING FUND 0.00 1,327,234.00 GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FUND 0.00 94,791.00 MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL SERV FUND 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 IMPACT FEES FUND 0.00 232,470.00 CIP FUND 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 TOTAL $71,326,282.76 $136,908,677.94 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments A revenue update and projection will be provided with the next budget amendment of FY26. No updates or modifications from the FY26 Adopted Budget are proposed at this time. Finance staff will be preparing a revised revenue forecast with the close of September revenues, which will be made available in late October. The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #2. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #2, the available fund balance will adjust to 12.71 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146, 448, 554 174,290, 532 14,931, 953 78,854, 192 93,786, 145 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - - Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127, 790, 739$ 152,085, 598$ 14,931, 953$ 78,854, 192$ 93,786, 145$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30. 50%31.66%25.42%17. 38%18.30% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188, 435) ( 3,188, 435) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124, 602, 304 148,897, 163 14,931, 953 78,854, 192 93,786, 145 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57%29. 74%30.99%25.42%17. 38%18.30% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664, 442) (40,827, 348) - ( 27,392, 780) ( 27,392, 780) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469, 408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468, 933) ( 2,468, 933) (358, 000) (358, 000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407, 524) ( 3,407, 524) (913, 000) (913, 000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904, 861 3,904, 861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959, 861) ( 3,959, 861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013, 067 1,013, 067 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736, 688) ( 9,936, 688) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 14,931,953 78,854,192 93,786,145 14,931,953 50,190,412 65,122,365 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 24.32%18. 82%19.52%25.42%11. 06%12.71% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419, 006, 975 480,404, 359 58,749, 999 453, 721, 525 512,471, 524 General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections FY2026BudgetFY2025Budget The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $913, 000 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in fourteen (14) funds, with a total revenue increase of $71,326,283 and an expenditure increase of $136,908, 678. The amendment will also add 4.0 FTEs. One is related to a reclassification in Police and three pertain to a VOCA grant for the Prosecutor’s Office. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 Second amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2025. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2025. Published: Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved as to Form s/Jaysen Oldroyd 09/2/2025 Jaysen Oldroyd Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF 0.00 350,000.00 One-time - 2 National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF 0.00 300,000.00 One-time - 3 Elected Officials Transition Costs GF 0.00 45,000.00 One-time - 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (51,000.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (300,000.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Project Reclass CIP 0.00 (371,250.00)One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S CIP 0.00 722,250.00 One-time 4 Council Legislative Intent - 1200 East Median Reconstruction 300 S to 500 S - Unallocated Park Impact Fees Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 One-time 5 Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 6 Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF 0.00 0.00 Ongoing 1.00 7 Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP 180,000.00 180,000.00 One-time 8 Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP 70,000.00 70,000.00 One-time 9 Take-home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 Ongoing 10 CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Ongoing 1 Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF 0.00 168,000.00 One-time - 2 IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS 0.00 159,414.00 One-time - 3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS 0.00 2,241,881.18 One-time - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office IMS 50,000.00 50,000.00 Ongoing - 4 Language Access Transfer from the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 50,000.00 Ongoing 5 Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf 0.00 957,404.00 One-time - 6 Green Bike Expansion CIP 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 7 Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP 6,355,027.04 6,355,027.04 One-time - 8 Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 One-time - 9 CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP 414,753.00 414,753.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 One-time - 10 Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 (301,500.00)One-time - 11 Volunteers of America Contract GF 0.00 301,500.00 One-time - 12 Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 678,600.00 678,600.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 0.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - 13 CIP Housekeeping CIP 3,900,000.00 3,900,000.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 CouncilApprovedAdministrationProposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 608,290.00 608,290.00 One-time - 2 Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants 5,284.00 5,284.00 One-time - 3 Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants 26,832.00 26,832.00 One-time - Consent Agenda 1 VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants 596,025.60 596,025.60 Ongoing 3.00 2 VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants 256,518.12 256,518.12 Ongoing - 3 Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants 579,834.00 579,834.00 Ongoing - 4 Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS)Misc Grants 9,029.00 9,029.00 One-time - 5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants 6,500.00 6,500.00 One-time - 6 School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce ServicesMiscGrants 1,368,000.00 1,368,000.00 Ongoing - 7 Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants 33,900.00 33,900.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 136,908,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #2: General Fund GF 0.00 913,000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 IMS Fund IMS 50,000.00 2,451,295.18 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,490,212.72 3,490,212.72 0.00 0.00 3.00 Golf Fund Golf 0.00 957,404.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 0.00 13,202,498.00 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Fund Refuse 0.00 9,350,559.00 0.00 0.00 - Water Fund Water 51,079,400.00 66,849,851.00 0.00 0.00 - Sewer Fund Sewer 0.00 12,083,142.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 7,349,551.00 0.00 0.00 - Street Lighting Fund Street Lighting 0.00 1,327,234.00 0.00 0.00 - Governmental Immunity Fund Govt Immun 0.00 94,791.00 0.00 0.00 - Miscellaneous Special Service Fund Misc Spec Serv 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Fund Impact Fees 0.00 232,470.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 12,206,670.04 16,106,670.04 0.00 0.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 71,326,282.76 136,908,677.94 0.00 0.00 4.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - 453,721,525.09 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 30,514,822.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 53,881,754.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 27,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 23,925,700.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 43,102,934.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 25,469,123.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 14,156,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 - - - 2,248,700,014.83 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464, 359,952 358,000.00 913,000.00 465,630,952.26 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 36,589,783.00 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 64,514,224.04 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 476,954,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 36,937,750.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 69,846,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 45,504,229.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 38,707,891.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 27,527,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 16,204,689.72 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 358,000.00 136,908,677.94 - - - 2,049,724,809.31 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Youth & Family Funding Due to Loss of Grant GF One-time $350,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Liz Rich For questions, please include Liz Rich, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker The Community and Neighborhood Department is requesting $350,000 for the Youth and Family (YF) Division to sustain current service levels and programming following the loss of the DWS Teen Afterschool Prevention (TAP) grant with a federal funding source. Salt Lake City previously received the TAP grant for three funding cycles (nine years) but was not awarded funding this year due to reduced statewide allocations and a shift in priority toward rural communities. Had it been awarded, the three-year TAP grant would have provided $1,008,000 to operate middle school programs across the city. This shortfall is compounded by the expiration of ARPA funds that once supported summer grants, as well as licensing requirements that mandate low staff-to-student ratios and the need to offer competitive wages for frontline staff. To maintain services, YF has strategically reviewed general fund allocations and streamlined programs and processes. However, a $350,000 funding gap remains, which impacts programming in Glendale, Central City, and Rose Park. Youth & Family has already taken significant steps to maximize existing resources, aligning with its strategic plan. Once that plan is finalized this fall, YF will pursue new public and private funding opportunities. A-2: National League of Cities Annual Cities Summit Costs GF One-time $300,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nikola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola and Mary Beth Thompson As the City prepares to host the National League of Cities annual Cities Summit this November the administration is requesting an additional $300,000 to be added to the Council funds allocated in the annual budget. Ahead of the conference the City must pay for services related to conference contractual obligations, including transportation, venue rental, event catering, entertainment, printing, and more. This additional funding will allow the City to finalize all contractually required elements of the conference in the lead up to November while the Administration continues to work on raising sponsorship money for the event, which is anticipated to be ongoing into November. Sponsorship has a goal to raise $250,00 to offset conference costs to the City. This item is being requested as a straw poll to expedite finalization of conference plans. A-3: Elected Officials Transition Costs GF One-time $45,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman Amending the budget to include $45,000 for Transition expenses of Elected Officials pursuant to City Code 2.03.030 and the upcoming 2025 Municipal Election. A-4: 1200 East Median Restoration 300 South to 500 South CIP One-time ($51,000.00) CIP One-time ($300,000.00) CIP One-time ($371,250.00) Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 CIP One-time $722,250.00 Impact Fees One-time $232,470.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Ben Luedtke For questions, please include Ben Luedtke, Mike Atkinson and Mary Beth Thompson In response to the Council’s legislative intent from August 19 (copied below), the Administration is proposing to fully fund the $954,720 project from a mix of funding sources as listed below: 232,470 of parks impact fees which would maximize the eligible portion of the project for 56 new trees, new median island noses / extensions, ADA access / crosswalks, and pollinator gardens, four benches, and public art. 351,000 rescope of FY2024 CIP complete streets appropriation. These funds are available because the Virginia Street reconstruction project is finishing under budget and a State Street project that had grant funding pulled resulting in the local matching funds being made available for other complete street projects. The funds would be used for removing curb, adding eight inch curb, asphalt tie ins on four islands, demolition, erosion control, earthwork, and mobilization. Rescope of $371,250 the $500,000 FY2025 CIP appropriation for adapting irrigation systems for irrigation system replacement, tree specific watering, sod removal, one-inch new topsoil, and at least 50% new sod for four islands, of which none has been expended. Note that the original appropriation included the medians from 300 South – 400 South but not from 400 South – 500 South. Legislative Intent: Budget Amendment Addressing Improvements to the Curb, Gutter, and Irrigation of the 1200 East Medians I further move that it is the intent of the Council to address funding for curb, gutter, and irrigation needs on the 1200 East medians (CIP Project #25) with existing funds in Transportation and Public Lands, in an upcoming budget amendment.” Project Description from the FY2026 CIP Funding Log: East Central Community Council 1200 East Median Restoration Proposal (300-400 South and 400- 500 South) A-5: Modification of Appointed Position at Police GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Chief Redd For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Communications Administrative Director Grade A03 Requested Position Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Grade A03 Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 Further Job Description information is included as an attachment in the amendment packet. A-6: Reclassification of Police Appointed Position to 2.0 FTEs GF Ongoing $0.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting a modification of the Communications Administrative Director appointed position. The modification request is to reflect updates to the title and job description to reflect the necessary administrative and functional duties of this position to be filled. No additional budget is being requested. Current Position Title: Internal Affairs Director Grade A03 (1) FTE Requested Position(s): Communications Coordinator - Social Media Content Grade E25 1 FTE Communications Coordinator - Communications Specialist Grade E25 1 FTE No additional funding is being requested. The Department would request a straw poll to allow for advertisement of the requested positions. Further Job Description information is included in the attachments in the amendment packet A straw poll is being requested on this item to expedite the recruitment of these positions. A-7: Utah Inland Port Authority Funding - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $180,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City has received a from the Inland Port Authority to help fund the expansion of the Trainfo system. These funds were received and now need to be transferred to CIP for expenditure. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for this afore mentioned expenditure. A-8: Airgas Funding to Transportation - Transfer to CIP CIP One-time $70,000.00 Department: CAN - Transportation Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery, Amy Dorsey, Jon Larsen and Randy Hillier The City received a $70,000 from Airgas for street modifications in front of their facility. Airgas desires to eliminate street racing events on 700 South. Airgas desires to have two speed tables installed near their Facility. This amendment establishes the CIP related budget for the project. A-9: Take-Home Vehicle Insurance Policy Premium Adjustment Govt. Immunity One-time $94,791.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Cindy Lou Trishman and Lauree Roberts The request submitted with the annual budget was in anticipation of a proposed policy premium cost ($200,000); however, due to losses incurred between the time of the estimate (Dec 2024) and the July 1 decision deadline, the premium cost increased to $294,791. The difference in proposed cost to actual cost will be covered by the Government Immunity Fund while the budget amendment process proceeds. Since the allocation and budgetary approval was for a lesser amount, this serves as a request to increase the allocation considered for premium payment. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 A-10: CBIA-25 Budget Misc Spec Rev One-time $2,500,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jocob Maxwell / Lorena Riffo- Jenson For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson CBIA-25 - On April 1, 2025, the City Council adopted to re-establish the Central Business Improvement Assessment Area (CBIA-25) for an additional 3-year term. Due to the timing of the adoption, the budget was unable to be set during the City’s annual budget. As part of the adoption/allocation, $151,200 for the City's needs is to be transferred as "General Fund Expense" for the City's Administrative Fee. Also, $185,630 would need to be held in a reserve account. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: Construction Mitigation Fund Carry Forward GF One-time $168,000.00 Department: Economic Development Prepared By: Jacob Maxwell For questions, please include Jacob Maxwell and Lorena Riffo-Jenson In FY 2025, budget amendment #5, the City Council allocated $270,000 in Construction Mitigation Funds to continue supporting the eligible businesses within the local community that would be impacted by the major road reconstruction projects. From mid- May and all of June 2025, the Department of Economic Development (DED) deployed $102,000 to impacted businesses before the close of FY 2025. DED would like to request that the remaining $168,000 be carried forward into FY 2026, which amounts to 56 additional $3,000 grants to businesses. The construction projects that began in FY 2025 and are still impacting businesses in FY 2026 include: 2100 South (700 E – 1100 E) - ongoing 2100 South Median (1100 E – 1300 E) – began spring 2025 1300 East (2100 S to 3300 S) - began spring 2025 300 West Bike Lane (900 S to 300 S) - began spring 2025 This item was highlighted as part of the FY 2026 annual budget, with the intent to address this need via budget amendment and the carry over process. D-2: IMS CCAC FY 2026 Budget IMS One-Time $159,414.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley As part of the FY 2026 budget, the Citizen Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) recommended funding for multiple city departments to address compensation for positions lagging the market. IMS was impacted and additional funding was recommended. Due to the timing of the IMS budget process, this funding was not captured in the IMS budget. IMS, with the use of the IMS Fund Balance, is now requesting this budget to be accounted for as part of the FY 2026 annual budget. D-3: IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward IMS One-time $2,241,881.18 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting carry forward budget from FY 2025 to FY 2026 to cover contract encumbrances that were established during FY 2025 but not yet been fully paid. Without this carry forward amendment, the contract payments would need to be paid from the FY 2026 budget, which isn’t sufficient to cover these costs. D-4: Language Access Transfer from the Mayor’s Office IMS Ongoing $50,000.00 GF Ongoing $50,000.00 Department: IMS Prepared By: Joseph Anthony For questions, please include Joseph Anthony, Gloria Cortez and Aaron Bentley IMS is requesting $50,000 for the language access transfers needed to operate contract language access services within the city. These funds were previously part of the Mayor’s Office budget. However, the total amount allocated for Language Access was reduced from the Mayor’s Office budget; $50,000 was moved to the Justice Court, and $50,000 was transferred to IMS. However, the increase was inadvertently omitted from the IMS budget, requiring this amendment to add it in for FY 2026. D-5: Golf Fund Budget Carry Forward Golf One-time $957,404.00 Department: Public Lands - Golf Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans and Bryce Lindeman The Public Lands Department is requesting $957,404 for the Golf Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward. Budget is required to pay the outstanding financial obligations that were encumbered in FY 2025 but will be paid in FY 2026. D-6: Green Bike Expansion CIP One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance - CIP Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Mike Atkinson This amendment will establish a budget in CIP for funds received from UDOT for the expansion of the Green Bike program. $608,290 was received for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. The funds are received in the Miscellaneous Grants fund and must be transferred to CIP for the above-mentioned purposes. D-7: Interest on General Obligation and Sales Tax Bonds CIP One-time $6,355,027.04 Department: Finance - Treasurer Prepared By: Jared Jenkins / Jou Ying Su For questions, please include Marina Scott, Jared Jenkins and Jou Ying Su Over the past few years, unspent proceeds from various bond issuances have earned interest while being deposited with trustees. This amendment will adjust the budgets to include interest for the various issuances to reflect the actual proceeds available. Greater detail on each is contained below. General Obligation Bond Series 2020, was issued in September 2020 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $17,745,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including interest earned from July 2024 through July 2025. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 General Obligation Bonds Series 2021, was issued in November 2021 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $20,600,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2022, was issued in September 2022 to fund reconstruction of City streets. Par value of the issued bonds was $21,785,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022 B&C, were issued in October 2022 for the purpose of financing several capital projects throughout the City. The bonds were issued at a par amount of $64,225.000. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. General Obligation Bonds Series 2023, was issued in August 2023 to fund improvements of City parks and trails. Par value of the issued bonds was $24,765,000. At the time the bonds were issued the proceeds were deposited with the Trustee. Since then, unspent bond proceeds have earned interest. This amendment will adjust the budget to reflect actual proceeds available including accumulated interest from July 2024 through July 2025. D-8: Fleet Fund Budget Carry Forward Fleet One-time $13,202,498.00 Department: Public Services – Fleet Prepared By: Julie Crookston / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Julie Crookston, Kimberly Schmelling and Obreaee Hardy This is the Fleet encumbrance carry forward for vehicles/equipment that were committed to with the funds appropriated in FY 2025 or earlier, but that have not been received or completed and put into service. Additionally, a small amount of this request relates to encumbrances for various vehicle asset maintenance services or purchases that were also not fully expensed by the FY 2025 year-end. D-9: CIP Holding Account Release for Security Services CIP One-time $414,753.00 Department: Public Services Prepared By: Jorge Chamorro / Nate Kobs / Kimberly Schmelling For questions, please include Jorge Chamorro, Nate Kobs and Kimberly Schmelling Public Services is requesting the release of $414,753.24 from the CIP holding account for physical security improvements at City Hall. These funds were allocated in Budget Amendment #5, of FY 2023, and were placed in a holding account. After the last releases of funds, in January and September, 2024, the current unallocated balance in the holding account stands at $586,867.21, from which the $414,753 will come. This latest release is intended to support two critical projects under the Internal Security Program. 1. Washington Square Safety Enhancement Project - Cultural Landscape (CL) Report + Implementation Design ($380,000): The Use and Conservancy Board has voted on and provided their recommendation to Mayor Mendenhall to conduct the Cultural Landscape Report. The cost of the CL report is estimated to be 80,000 and will provide a comprehensive analysis of the historical, cultural and design elements of Washington Square, ensuring that any proposed security improvements, particularly ramming mitigation implementations, are context-sensitive and preserve the site's historic integrity. The report will serve as a critical foundation for the Project Design phase, estimated at $300,000, which will develop detailed plans for integrating vehicle ramming mitigation measures while maintaining the Square's aesthetic and cultural significance. Both the CLR and Implementation Design will be completed by the same firm to ensure continuity. 2. Wireless Door Release Systems - City Hall ($34,753.24): Several departments within City Hall have submitted requests for wireless door release systems. The systems provide employees with the ability to Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 remotely unlock secured doors using a handheld or desktop control device. By minimizing direct face-to-face interactions in potentially volatile situations, these systems significantly improve employee safety and reduce the risk of confrontational incidents. D-10: Public Utilities Budget Carry Forward Water One-time $66,849,851.00 Sewer One-time $12,083,142.00 Storm Water One-time $7,349,551.00 Street Lighting One-time $1,327,234.00 Department: Public Utilities Prepared By: Lisa Tarufelli For questions, please include Lisa Tarufelli, Laura Briefer and Mark Christensen The items included in this housekeeping budget amendment for Public Utilities are carry forwards from the FY 2025 budget. These include grant proceeds, capital purchases and projects which were in process during the prior fiscal year but were not completed (final purchase order or contract) before June 30, 2025. During the Fiscal Year 2026 budget preparation process, it was anticipated the procurement process for these items would be completed prior to year end, thus they were not re-budgeted in FY 2026. The Bond Anticipation Notes were not anticipated during the budget process and will be executed prior to the next budget amendment. Public Utilities staff have been directed to include this transaction as part of this amendment. D-11: Volunteers of America Contract GF One-time ($301,500.00) GF One-time $301,500.00 Department: CAN – Housing Stability Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Brent Beck and Tammy Hunsaker In FY 2025, $402,000 was budgeted for the Volunteers of America (VOA) through the State Mitigation Grant. Since the grant is now focused on PD-related budgets for FY 2026, the VOA budget was inadvertently excluded during the FY 2026 budget process. CAN is now requesting that the VOA be funded through the General Fund. Housing Stability was able to use FY 2025 funds to extend the VOA contract for three months into FY 2026. As a result, the FY 2026 request is $301,500 rather than the full $402,000. To keep this request budget neutral, CAN proposes reallocating existing , not yet contracted funds. Specifically, 301,500 from FY 2026 Housing FOF funds from the Tenant Housing Assistance budget. The VOA funding is utilized for street outreach and to pay a staff salary for a Safety and Community Liaison for the resource centers. For this year, the Liaison has been reorganized and placed under the Shelter the Homeless organization. As such, for FY 2026, CAN is also proposing to split the funding into two separate contracts: $240,627 for VOA and $60,873 for Shelter the Homeless. D-12: Refuse Fund Budget Carry Forward Refuse One-time $9,350,559.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Debbie Lyons For questions, please include Debbie Lyons The Sustainability Department is requesting $9,350,559 for the Refuse Fund annual encumbrance balance carry forward budget. Budget is required in order to pay the outstanding financial obligations that have been obligated and carried forward from FY 2025 into FY 2026. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 D-13: CIP Housekeeping CIP One-time $678,600.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 CIP One-time $3,900,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson FY25 Key Changes - Parks Impact Fees Revenue and Expenditure – In FY 2025, this item was underfunded by $678,600. This Budget Amendment will increase the amount of Revenue by $678,600. These funds have already been allocated the Fairmont Park Basketball court. This amendment will formalize the budget. FY25 BA3 A-4 Fleet Block Property Sale - Infrastructure Development Condition – In FY 2025, this item was first, not properly transferred from CIP Surplus Land Fund 3039 to CIP General Fund 3000, and second, treated like a rescope rather than a new expenditure from Surplus Land Fund Balance. This Budget Amendment properly transfers the funds and establishes the correct expenditure amount of $3,900,000 within Fund 3000. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $608,290.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey. This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $608,290 for the purpose of building more additional bike stations. Salt Lake City will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed by UDOT. These funds will be used to build additional bike stations. E-2: Increased HUD HOME-ARP Award Misc Grants One-time $5,284.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This item recognizes $5,284 in new HUD HOME-ARP funding. On April 30, 2025, the City was notified of an error in HUD’s calculation of HOME -ARP allocations. As a result, the City will receive an additional $5,284, which requires a budget amendment to recognize the new funding for FY26. For context, in 2023 and 2024 the City approved a $3,533,195 HUD HOME Investment Partnerships Program – American Rescue Plan Act (HOME-ARP) award. Those funds were allocated to development projects, Tenant -Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) programs, and administration activities. Because the full award amount was assumed at the time of Council approval, no funding contingencies were included. The Administration now proposes allocating the additional $5,284 to the Asian Association of Utah, the highest -scoring applicant in the TBRA category. E-3: Increased HUD HOPWA Award Misc Grants One-time $26,832.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Tony Milner Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 For questions, please include Tony Milner, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This is a housekeeping item to recognize an increased HUD HOPWA award of $26,832. The amendment is overall budget neutral. This action increases the FY26 appropriated budget from $945,200 to $972,032 to reflect the additional HOPWA funds awarded to Salt Lake City, which exceeded the original budget projection. As a reminder, on April 21, 2025, through Resolution 11 of 2025, the City Council approved FY26 HOPWA subrecipient awards along with contingency plans for distributing any additional funding. The Administration will follow these Council-approved contingencies to allocate the $26,832 increase to designated programs and subrecipients. Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #1 G-1: VOCA Grant Victim Services for the Prosecutor's Office Misc Grants $596,025.60 Department: Attorney’s Office - Prosecutor Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tina Orme The Salt Lake City Prosecutor's Office applied for and received a Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grant. This grant is for two years. The funded items include: 1) The grant will now fully fund an existing victim advocate whose time is currently grant funded at 63.75%. 2) The grant will allow the Prosecutor's office to hire two additional Victim Advocates and will pay 100% of their salary and benefits. 3) Funding for mental health workshops for victims 4) Funding for travel and training for staff 5) Emergency funds for victims and finally, 6) Funding for the VSTracking software license. Funding for the 1st year is $293,152.80, and the 2nd year is $302,872.80 The job posting for the two additional Victim Advocates will indicate the funding limitations, and that the positions could be removed should no funding be obtained after the two -year period. The Mental Health workshops are designated to assist victims of violent crimes by being a part of a safe open group discussion and are led by an LCSW every month on a different topic such as: Healthy relationships, making and keeping boundaries, Anxiety, Self Worth, and other topics that would assist the victim with information, resources and education. The emergency fund assists the victim to cover the cost of immediate needs such as the travel necessary for stability and safety, obtaining the necessities of life if the victim left home with just the clothes they had on, or if the victim needs childcare while attending court. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 10 Finally, the Victim Services Tracking (VSTracking) software keeps track of all the statistics that the grants require. It also the Victim Advocates notes following communication with the victims, their wants/needs and the resources that the office gives out. Public hearing was held April 15, 2025 G-2: VOCA Grant Victim Services Police Department Misc Grants $256,518.12 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard The Salt Lake City Police Department applied for and received a VOCA grant. This grant is for two years. This grant will pay for existing Victim Advocates. The grant has also provided funding for the previous year’s Victim Advocate costs. The total funded per year is $128,259 of which $105,468 is salary and $22,791 is fringe for part time victim advocates. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and if this grant is not renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-3: Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Misc Grants $579,834.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard This grant will fund the salary and benefits for the existing Salt Lake City PD K9 officer and Task Force Finance Manager/Grant Administrator assigned to task force. Funding will also support overtime for outside agencies that participate in the task force. The positions have been previously funded by the grant and should this grant not be renewed in future years, the positions will not be able to continue. Public hearing was held August 13, 2024 G-4: Bureau of Emergency Medical Service (BEMS) Misc Grants $9,029.00 Department: Fire Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Brittany Blair Each year, the Fire Department receives an allocation based on a per capita formula to support emergency medical services. The amount varies but has been approximately $10-000-$15,000 which is used by the department for medical supplies. Public hearing was held Feb. 18,2025 G-5 SFSP Summer Food Service Program Summer 2025 Misc Grants $6,500.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Koty Lopez The Division of Youth and Family Services submitted a renewal application for reimbursement to provide nutritious snacks to Youth City participants during summer of 2025. Public hearing was held July 8, 2025 G-6: School-Age Program State of Utah, Department of Workforce Services Misc Grants $1,368,000.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich Youth and Family Services applied for and received a grant award of $456,000 per year for three years to support Out of School (OST) time program. High quality OST programs provide safe, supportive, interactive and engaging environments for school age youth. This grant will provide support for OST programs with a focus on achieving and maintaining quality programming, and an emphasis on student, community and organization engagements. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #2 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 11 Each year, the following amounts are allocated from the $456,000 being provided; $ 382,889.52 for Salaries and Fringe for existing positions, $3,120 for Communications, $20,000 for client services, $5,000 for snacks, $30,070.48 for Materials and Supplies, and $3,000 for Professional Fees and Contract Services and $11,920 . A public hearing was held May 20, 2025 G-7: Salt Lake County YAGI Grant Misc Grants $33,900.00 Department: CAN – Youth & Family Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Elizabeth Rich The Youth Advocacy Initiative will support the Salt Lake City YouthCity Government program to engage in advocacy efforts to promote healthy youth. Funding from this grant will support advocacy projects for the 2025 -2026 school year, as well as travel to the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions forum in Washington DC. This grant is intended to help the city continue the work on anti-bullying initiatives and adolescent mental health. The project will include gathering teens to develop research based talking points, Q&A's and preventative strategies for reducing bullying within Salt Lake City. The grant will also provide funding for Youth City Government to create a public service campaign to inform teens about preventative health measures. A public hearing was held July 8, 2025 Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees (Page 1) Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Fire Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Budget Amount Values Description Cost Center 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$ 8419202 3,079$ 3,021$ 3,021$ (2,963)$ 8423004 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ B Grand Total Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Remaining Description Cost Center FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 8416005 1,733$ 855$ 1,733$ (855)$ 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ 8420136 149,953$ -$ 162,067$ (12,114)$ FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ 8418005 262,043$ 262,043$ -$ -$ FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ 8418002 23,262$ -$ 19,638$ 3,624$ FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ FY24CIP-3037-Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ FY FY25B1D15-3037-Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing the Trail 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 8420430 125,740$ 66,901$ 58,839$ -$ 8423408 499,457$ -$ 5,511$ 493,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 5,609,300$ 273,777$ 5,466,922$ 8423450 4,350,000$ 1,561,800$ 2, 788,200$ -$ 8422406 2,246,982$ 1,228,956$ 1, 018,027$ -$ 8422408 513,788$ 24,243$ 489,546$ 0$ C 8422410 315,770$ -$ 156,146$ 159,624$ 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ 8423005 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 8420134 404,139$ 1,649$ 14,304$ 388,186$ 8422414 475,079$ 6,361$ 13,693$ 455,024$ 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 8423409 299,269$ -$ 220,000$ 79,269$ 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,821$ 107$ 8423451 996,905$ -$ 429,207$ 567,698$ 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ 8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ 8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ 2,596$ 2,596$ (2,554)$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 1,050,562$ 830,103$ 1,172,273$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn WFY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Exp FY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 11,542$ 63,456$ 103,300$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 14,175$ 304,964$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 127,040$ 103,060$ 1,011,218$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ -$ -$ 150,736$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 22,382$ 11,481$ 397,996$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ 1,705$ -$ -$ Grand Total 9,160,648$ 8484003 777,182 8484002 Impact Fees (Page 2)CONTINUED from PG1 Data pulled 04/30/2025 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Description Cost Center 8423003 9,000$ -$ 1,540$ 7,460$ FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ -$ 47,592$ Grand Total Streets Allocation Budget Amended Allocation Encumbrances YTD Expenditures Allocation Remaining Appropriation Values Description Cost Center 8422622 35,300$ -$ -$ 35,300$ 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 8423606 40,000$ 40,000$ -$ -$ 8422611 90,000$ 25,000$ -$ 65,000$ 8418016 22,744$ -$ -$ 22,744$ 8412001 11,703$ 5,685$ 6,018$ -$ D FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ -$ -$ 3,204,371$ 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ 8418003 181,303$ -$ 136,936$ 44,367$ 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 8406001 15,169$ 12,925$ 585$ 1,659$ 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ FY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, an 90,000$ -$ 1,418$ 88,582$ 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 8421501 340,236$ -$ 53,109$ 287,127$ 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ 8423608 110,000$ -$ 5,205$ 100,000$ FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ 8420110 46,883$ 11,820$ 5,480$ 29,583$ 8422620 6,316$ -$ -$ 6,316$ 8421500 241,135$ 2,558$ 118,188$ 120,388$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriate 30,183$ -$ -$ 30,183$ FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419 29,817$ 17,442$ -$ 12,374$ 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Grand Total Total E = A + B + C + D 15,372,660$ 3,799,855$ 8484005 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,634,974$ 8484001 This page has intentionally been left blank Proposed Job Title: Civilian Chief of Staff Job Code: New FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Supervisor Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Executives Job Profile Summary The Civilian Chief of Staff serves as a strategic advisor and organizational leader supporting the Chief of Police in advancing department-wide goals, improving operational efficiency, and strengthening interdepartmental and community relationships. This position brings non-sworn expertise in management, policy, communications, and administration to enhance the department’s performance and responsiveness. This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system. Job Description TYPICAL DUTIES: Manage the Police Chief’s priorities, aligning command staff and department initiatives with the agency’s strategic goals. Oversee or facilitate the development and implementation of strategic plans, reform initiatives, and performance measurement systems. Lead or coordinate administrative functions such as budgeting, human resources, policy review, and special projects. Serve as a liaison between the department and city administration, community partners, and other stakeholders. Support cultural change efforts, workforce development, and modernization initiatives. Drive high-priority initiatives across divisions, ensuring timelines, impact, and accountability are met. Research, write and edit, or assists in the research, writing and editing, of speeches for the Police Chief and others as requested. Acts as Public Information Officer when assigned as such by the Police Chief or designee. Keep Police Chief and/or command staff advised regarding the coordination of information dissemination. Works with GRAMA coordinator and/or legal counsel to ensure consistency and uniformity in position statements, and in dealing with members of the media. Counsel command staff on public relations protocols and implication of issues vital to the well being and best interests of the City and Police Department. Responsible for the Police Department’s communication materials including the design and content of the Department’s web site and social media. Research, write, prepare, edit and oversee publication of the informational brochures/flyers and a broad range of other publications. Coordinate photography, interviews, statistics and other needed information. Develops and directs radio, television, film and newspaper advertising campaigns. Writes letters, speeches and presentations. Serve as Public Information Officer when directed. Serve as the Department’s contact for local, national and international media. Responds to requests for specialized information, coordinates interviews/release of information and performs research on behalf of the media. Direct or manage on camera interviews. Direct or manage media releases and public information announcements, coordinates news conferences and handles the media in emergency response situations. Promotes the Police Department through positive media exposure and directs or manages the Department’s spokesperson. Proofread, edit and analyze City and Police Department documents before they become public domain (budget books, policy papers, etc.). As directed, coordinates and directs press conferences arranged by the Chief or designee. Coordinate responses to issues raised by the public and other stakeholders and works with the Mayor’s Office in this endeavor to ensure consistent reaction while tracking issues and responses. Establish and maintain strong working relationships with internal bureaus and units as well as other departments within the city, county and state to promote collaboration, to include participating in monthly city communications coordination meetings acting as the police department’s representative. Seek out, coordinate, and engage in all department outreach programs and community engagements to leverage involvement and face-to-face interactions on behalf of the Department. Coordinate annual events such as the Fallen Officer Memorial, Awards Gala, and Police Week activities for the department, to include engaging key attendees, creating branding and programs, finalizing script, and working closely with involved committees. Evaluate success and establish mechanisms for feedback through two-way communication channels to meet department goals, to include developing cross sector partnerships that allow for ongoing and substantive dialogues on community needs and vision. Establish and maintain associations and contacts with national, state and local representatives to ensure the Department is properly represented within the industry and local community as well as with the public. Manage designs, order, and update all public education and recruiting collateral in conjunction with CompStat assignments, outreach programs, and community engagement. Oversee all daily press releases (Watch Logs, wanted persons, public warnings, media advisories, etc.) and confers with counsel on release of information. Performs other duties as assigned. PREFERED QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited four-year college or university with a degree in Broadcast Media, English, Journalism, Communications, Public Relations, Political Science or a related field. At least five years’ experience in journalism or public relations; experience in broadcast television and in management preferred. Ability to interact effectively with police personnel, department heads, government and business leaders, and others in positions of authority and influence. Demonstrated superior communications skills, including the ability to deal effectively with members of both broadcast and print media and to appear on behalf of the Chief, and Police Department on radio or broadcast television. Preference may be given to applicants with local media experience. WORKING CONDITIONS: Light physical effort. Mostly comfortable working positions, handling light weights, intermittent sitting, standing, and walking. Frequent exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and the requirements of the job. The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified. All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE DEPARTMENT XX Created on August 27, 2025 Created by Aubrey Garduno, HRBP This page has intentionally been left blank Current Position: Job Title: 0035504 Internal Affairs Administrative Director Job Code: 002525 FLSA: FLSA Exempt Pay Rate Type: Salary Comp Grade: A03 Management Level: Division Director Job Classifications BU: 000 - (Appointed 000) EEO Code: OFFICIALS_AND_ADMINISTRATORS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Workers’ Comp Code: 3 - Clerical Job Family: Management Analyst Base Comp: $164,750.83 ($187,946) Proposed: Communications Coordinator (Job Profile attached) 1) Social Media Content Creator 1) Communication Specialist This page has intentionally been left blank 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 1 of 4 Overview Overview Inactive No View As Of 09/11/ 2025 Date of Last Change 06/20/ 2025 11:05:29.781 PM Job Profile Name Communications Coordinator Job Code 002520 Include Job Code in Name No Job Profile Summary Performs full professional level communications and promotional work involved in preparing, implementing, and presenting a variety of departmental informational campaigns, communications, and knowledge-based materials for city operations. Works closely with senior executives to establish organizational messages and keep staff informed of key work initiatives and developments. Coordinates internal employee communications programs, including employee newsletters, brochures, policies and procedures manuals, and related communications. Creates, coordinates, and oversees the distribution and delivery of information across divisions. TYPICAL DUTIES: Participates in planning, developing, and implementing marketing strategies and employee engagement plans, projects, or programs. Ensures all plans are in alignment with the department’s overall mission and strategic plan. Research, plan, draft, design, edit, and distribute various materials, including fact sheets, brochures, news articles, annual reports, and presentations. Develops comprehensive timelines for projects and events, implements agreed upon communications strategy within budget. Synthesizes complicated matters and data into an understandable context and follows through on inquiries, research requests, and drafting messages for approval. Disseminates information pertinent to employees through newsletters, bulletins, email, presentations, print, or other communication techniques to reach employees out in the field. Builds and coordinates social media output by creating communications for internal and external audiences and distributing information and materials for social media websites. Supports emergency communication efforts and media management during a crisis.• Monitors and evaluates communication effectiveness to ensure employees utilize the information provided.• Archives and maintains department communications assets and publishing content on internal and external department websites. May supervisor part time employees.• Perform other duties as assigned.• MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor’s degree in English, Marketing, Communications, or a closely related field plus two to four years of professional-level experience performing communications, marketing, and/or Job Description 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 2 of 4 public relations.Education and experience may be substituted one for the other on a year-for-year basis. Creative ability to devise effective communication strategies.• Knowledge and familiarity with information technology, basic design, and digital editing is essential.• Excellent writing, editing, and proofreading skills.• Effective oral and written communication skills; excellent interpersonal skills.• Ability to resolve highly complex issues; develop and communicate new policies and procedures.• Ability to work effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and at various levels of the organization.• WORKING CONDITIONS: Generally comfortable working conditions requiring light physical effort.Intermittent sitting, standing, and walking.May require frequent travel between office and department or meeting location. Considerable exposure to stress as a result of human behavior and job requirements.• The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed by persons assigned to this job.They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties, responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified.All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Additional Job Description POSITION TYPE Full-Time / Part-Time / Seasonal POSITION SALARY RANGE DEPARTMENT XX Job Title Default Restrict to Country Management Level Individual Contributor Job Family Employee Marketing & Communications Specialist Job Classifications 600 - (Professional 600) PROFESSIONALS - (EEO-4 Job Classification) Work Shift Required No Public Job Yes Referral Payment Plan 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 3 of 4 Characteristics Difficulty to Fill Critical Job No Compensation Compensation Grade E25 Compensation Grade Profile Impacted Eligibility Rules Business Process History Business Process History Business Process Effective Date Initiated On Completed On Status Edit Job Profile: Communications Coordinator 10/07/2024 10/ 07/2024 10:48: 10 AM 10/07/2024 10:55:27 AM Successfully Completed Qualifications Certifications Certification Required Country Certification (Predefined)Certification (Not Predefined)Issuer (Not Predefined) Skills Skill Attributes Required Skill Skill Level Competencies Competencies from Other Sources Required Competency Target Rating Source Source Type Education Education Required Degree Field of Study Languages Languages 10:46 AM 09/11/2025 Page 4 of 4 Required Language Ability Proficiency Responsibilities Responsibilities Required Responsibility Training Training Required Training Training Type Description Work Experience Work Experience Required Work Experience Experience Level Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Equivalence Rule Derived Logic Pay Pay Rate Type Pay Rate Types Country Pay Rate Type United States of America Salary Job Exempt Job Exempt Country / Country Region Job Exempt United States of America Yes Workers' Compensation Code Worker's Compensation Codes Workers' Compensation Code Country Country Region Location 3 - Clerical (United States of America)United States of America This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170, 000 - $ 425, 000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130, 000 - $ 270, 000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110, 000 - $ 250, 000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be ninety percent (90%) of the salary of a district court judge.JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 Justice Court Administrator E37 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 Community Outreach Special Projects & Access Coordinator E24 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Communications Administrative DirectorCivilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank Salary Range Grade Department Directors $170, 000 - $ 425, 000 A01 Deputy Department Directors $130, 000 - $ 270, 000 A02 Division Directors & Executive Staff $110, 000 - $ 250, 000 A03 Judges In accordance with city code 2.84.040, compensation of a judge of the justice court shall be ninety percent (90%) of the salary of a district court judge.JC01 All other appointed employees Refer to General Employee Pay Plan (GEPP) DEPARTMENT JOB TITLE GRADE 911 BUREAU 002626 911 Dispatch Director A01 AIRPORT 001551 Executive Director of Airports A01 002533 Airport Chief Operating Officer A02 000795 Director Airport Design & Construction Management A03 000794 Director of Airport Maintenance A03 000163 Director of Finance & Accounting - Airport A03 000162 Director of Real Estate & Commercial Development A03 001365 Director of Airport Information Technology A03 001654 Director of Airport Planning & Capital Programming A03 001011 Director of Operations - Airport A03 002349 Director of Communications and Marketing - Airport A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 CITY ATTORNEY 001553 City Attorney A01 001577 Deputy City Attorney A02 3041 Deputy Director of Operations and Administration A02 3040 City Prosecutor A03 000314 City Recorder A03 002923 Legislative Affairs Division Director A03 CITY COUNCIL NO PROFILE Council Member-Elect N/A* 000021 Executive Director - City Council Office A01 000026 Deputy Director - City Council A02 001459 Council Legal Director A03 001980 Associate Deputy Director - City Council E37 002637 Legislative & Policy Manager E37 001954 Senior Public Policy Analyst E33 001895 Communications Director - City Council E31 002636 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist III E31 002472 Operations Manager & Mentor - City Council E31 000344 Public Policy Analyst E31 002355 Policy Analyst / Public Engagement E28 002358 Public Engagement / Communications Specialist II E28 002357 Constituent Liaison / Policy Analyst E27 002354 Constituent Liaison E26 3063 Public Engagement & Communications Specialist I E26 002353 Assistant to Council Executive Director E25 002351 Council Administrative Assistant E24 COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS 002060 Director of Community & Neighborhoods A01 002068 Deputy Director of Community & Neighborhoods A02 002562 Deputy Director of Community Services - Community & Neighborhoods A02 002312 Arts Division Director A03 006440 Building Official A03 004031 City Engineer A03 006401 Division Director of Housing & Neighborhood Development A03 002899 Division Director of Transportation A03 004165 Planning Division Director A03 002326 Youth & Family Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 APPENDIX B – APPOINTED EMPLOYEES BY DEPARTMENT Effective June 22, 2025 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 001992 Director of Economic Development A01 002096 Deputy Director Economic Development A02 002545 Business Development Division Director A03 FINANCE 002091 Chief Financial Officer A01 002593 Deputy Chief Financial Officer A02 002342 City Treasurer A03 000504 Chief Procurement Officer A03 FIRE 008010 Fire Chief A01 001771 Assistant Fire Chief A02 001989 Executive Assistant E26 HUMAN RESOURCES 002475 Chief Human Resources Officer A01 002081 Deputy Chief Human Resources Officer A02 000337 Civilian Review Board Investigator E35 111001 Transition Chief of Staff N/A* 111002 Transition Communications Director N/A* 111003 Transition Executive Assistant N/A* INFORMATION MGT SERVICES 001578 Chief Information Officer A01 002816 Deputy Chief Information Officer A02 JUSTICE COURT 001601 Justice Court Judge A01 000539 Justice Court Administrator E37 MAYOR 000249 Chief of Staff A01 002470 Chief Administrative Officer A01 000897 Communications Director A03 002671 Deputy Chief Administrative Officer A03 001823 Deputy Chief of Staff A03 000002 Senior Advisor A03 002115 Communications Deputy Director E30 002536 Communications & Content Manager - Mayor's Office E30 002206 Policy Advisor E29 3064 REP Commission Policy Advisor E29 000898 Community Liaison E26 001989 Executive Assistant E26 001721 Office Manager - Mayor's Office E24 002526 Community Outreach Special Projects & Access Coordinator E24 001988 Administrative Assistant N19 002282 Consumer Protection Analyst N16 POLICE 007010 Chief of Police A01 001275 Deputy Chief of Police A02 002524 Civilian Chief of Staff A03 002525 Internal Affairs Administrative Director A03 3034 Police Commander E36 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC LANDS 002581 Director of Public Lands A01 002548 Deputy Director of Public Lands A02 002178 Golf Division Director A03 002405 Parks Division Director A03 002853 Urban Forestry Division Director A03 3019 Planning & Design Division Director A03 002330 Trails & Natural Lands Division Director A03 PUBLIC SERVICES 000579 Director of Public Services A01 002506 Deputy Director, Public Services A02 002894 Safety & Security Director A03 002176 Facilities Division Director A03 002177 Fleet Management Division Director A03 002189 Streets Division Director A03 002327 Compliance Division Director A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 PUBLIC UTILITIES 001552 Director of Public Utilities A01 000036 Deputy Director - Public Utilities A02 000037 Finance Administrator - Public Utilities A03 002092 Chief Engineer - Public Utilities A03 000039 Water Quality & Treatment Administrator A03 001989 Executive Assistant E26 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 002511 Director - Redevelopment Agency A01 002512 Deputy Director - Redevelopment Agency E37 SUSTAINABILITY 002036 Sustainability Director A01 002404 Sustainability Deputy Director A02 002186 Waste & Recycling Division Director A03 Except for a change in job title or reassignment to a lower pay level, no appointed position on this pay plan may be added, removed or modified without approval of the City Council. Compensation for transitional positions, including city council member-elect, is set as provided under Chapter 2.03.030 of the Salt Lake City Code. Benefits for transitional employees are equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. Except for leave time, benefits for city council members- elect are also equivalent to those provided to full-time employees. This page has intentionally been left blank Item C2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE:MOTION SHEET – Public Lands Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 W 200 N (West High Rebuild Related Zoning Amendments) MOTION 1 I move the Council adopt the ordinances amending the K-12 public school development standards and vacating a portion of 200 North between 300 West and 200 West. MOTION 2 I move the Council reject the ordinances. MOTION 3 I move the Council postpone action to a future Council meeting. COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Nick Tarbet, Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE:Public Lands Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 W 200 N (West High Rebuild Related Zoning Amendments) PROJECT TIMELINE: Briefing: August 19, 2025 Set Date: August 19, 2025 Public Hearing: Sept 2, 2025 Potential Action: Nov 18, 2025 NEW INFORMATION The Council deferred action on October 7. However, the Council did not ask for changes to the ordinance. It is on the November 18 agenda for potential action. The following information was provided for the September 9 Council meeting. It is provided again for background purposes. PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY Four people spoke during the September 2 public hearings about the proposed changes. They expressed concerns that the proposed design for the new school is not consistent with city plans and about the impact to the historic neighborhoods along 200 west / 200 north due to increased vehicle traffic accessing the new parking. Others said the preservation of the historic West High should have Page | 2 been more important for the school district. Some encouraged the Council to vote against the street vacation hoping this would prevent the construction from going forward. The following information was provided for the September 2 public hearing. It is provided again for background purposes. WORK SESSION SUMMARY The following information was provided for the August 19 briefing. It is provided again for background purposes. ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed on a proposed Text Amendment & Street Vacation at Approximately 240 West 200 North, related to the reconstruction of West High School. The proposed changes include: a.Zoning Text Amendment: The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Case Number: PLNPCM2025-00320 b.Street Vacation: Street vacation for a 130-foot-wide and 530-foot-long portion of 200 N between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. Case Number: PLNPCM2025-00321 Mayor Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend the Public Lands Zoning District to enact Temporary Land Use Regulations (TLUR) adopted by the City Council in March 2025 on a permanent basis. Those changes are: 1.Max building height up to 125 feet for public schools. Page | 3 2.Setbacks decreased when next to any zoning district that isn’t residential. 3.Allowed obstructions in required yards introduced. 4.K-12 Public Schools exempted from Historic Preservation Overlay District Provisions. 5.Any K-12 public school alteration will be approved by the Planning Division. 6.Modifications for Health and Safety Purposes are permitted according to the planning director. The Planning Commission forward a negative recommendation for the text amendment and a positive recommendation for the street vacation. STREET CLOSURE PROCESS The street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference. 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (1)In lieu of vacating some or all of a public street through a plat or amended plat in accordance with Sections 10-9a-603 through 10-9a-609, a legislative body may approve a petition to vacate a public street in accordance with this section. (2)A petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement shall include: (a)the name and address of each owner of record of land that is: (i)adjacent to the public street or municipal utility easement between the two nearest public street intersections; or (ii)accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public street or municipal utility easement; (b)proof of written notice to operators of utilities and culinary water or sanitary sewer facilities located within the bounds of the public street or municipal utility easement sought to be vacated; and (c)the signature of each owner under Subsection (2)(a) who consents to the vacation. (3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a- 208 and determine whether: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. (4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. Page | 4 (5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land is located: (a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or (b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and (ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated. (6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that has been dedicated to public use: (a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public street or municipal utility easement; and (b)may not be construed to impair: (i)any right-of-way or easement of any parcel or lot owner; (ii)the rights of any public utility; or (iii)the rights of a culinary water authority or sanitary sewer authority. (7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a process to vacate some or all of a public street. (b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a): (i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing; (ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent: (A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27; (B)the easement is included within the public street; and (C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and (iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street through a recorded plat or amended plat. (8)A legislative body may not approve a petition to vacate a public street under this section unless the vacation identifies and preserves any easements owned by a culinary water authority and sanitary sewer authority for existing facilities located within the public street. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 07/29/2025 Date Sent to Council: 08/07/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Amann, Grant E-mail grant.amann@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 08/06/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 08/07/2025 Subject: Zoning Text Amendment - PL Public Lands AND Street Vacation - Approx. 200 N 240 W Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Grant Amann, Grant.Amann@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Deny the Public Lands Zoning Text Amendment as recommended by Planning Commission and approve the 200 North Street Vacation as Recommended by Planning Commission Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Both petitions include City Code Ordinances that require approval by City Council during a public hearing after recommendation from Planning Commission. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director RECOMMENDATION: PLNPCM2025-00320 - Deny Public Lands text amendment as recommended by Planning Commission. PLNPCM2025-00321 - Approve the 200 North Street Vacation as recommended by Planning Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This proposal includes two separate petitions. PLNPCM2025-00320 is a text amendment specific to the Public Lands Zoning District. Th is requested text amendment is necessary to achieve the 2024 High School Bonded Improvements. In November of 2024, a High School Improvement Bond was approved by voters in Salt Lake City. The ballot title was as follows, “Shall the Board of Education of Salt Lake City School District, Utah, be authorized to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $730,000,000 and to mature in no more than twenty-one (21) years from the date or dates of issuance of such bonds for the purpose of raising money for constructing and acquiring buildings and furnishings and remodeling and updating existing school property, under the charge of the Board, and, to the extent necessary, for providing moneys for the refunding, at or prior to the maturity thereof, of general obligation bonds of the Board authorized hereunder or heretofore issued and now outstanding?” As a result of this bond approval, the Salt Lake City Council adopted temporary land use regulations (TLUR) on February 18th of 2025 (published on February 27, 2025). These temporary land use regulations were adopted with the purpose of facilitating the improvement bond. These temporary land use regulations were necessary to enable the redevelopment of K-12 public schools located within the Public Lands Zoning District. It is anticipated that the school district will receive site plan approval for the new Highland High and West High while the temporary land use regulations are in effect. This text amendment seeks to codify the amendments to the Public Lands Zoning District initiated by the temporary land use regulations (TLUR). These amendments altered the zoning requirements that apply to K-12 public schools, including increasing the maximum height, decreasing setbacks, allowing certain school related equipment in required yards, and exempting K-12 public schools from any provisions required by the Historic Preservation Overlay District. These amendments allow K-12 public schools more flexibility, but they also bring the requirements for the PL zoning district closer to the existing reality for K-12 schools that were built prior to the requirements of the district. The street vacation is specifically related to improvements for West High School and would ease its redevelopment. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: The proposed ordinance language is provided in Exhibit 1. The following changes are being proposed. Text Amendment to the PL – Public Lands Zoning District The following changes apply only to the specific “Schools, K-12 Public” use: A. The maximum building height increased to 125 feet. B. Interior side and rear yard setbacks decreased from 50’ to 30’ when adjacent to zoning districts that are not residential or manufacturing. C. Allowed obstructions in required yards introduced. D. K-12 Public Schools exempted from any provisions required by the Historic Preservation Overlay District. E. Any k-12 public school alteration will be approved by the Planning Division. F. Modifications for Health and Safety Purposes are permitted according to the planning director. Street Vacation The second application, PLNPCM2025-00321, is a partial street vacation for a portion of 200 North currently occupied by recreational uses associated with West High School. It is approximately 130 feet wide and 445 feet long. The current use of 200 N is regulated by a 1987 lease agreement between the School District and Salt Lake City. The street vacation is requested to relinquish public interest in the specified portion of the public street and to create a legitimate parcel of land. The parcel of land would be consolidated as part of a larger effort to consolidate the many parcels that make up West High School’s campus. The School District has not indicated intentions to build on the vacated portion of land, but rather, to use it as paved vehicular access for the property to the north of the former street. Map of the proposed street vacation. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Notice of the project and request for comments was sent to all Recognized Community Councils on May 15, 2025 • The Planning Commission public hearing was held on July 9, 2025 o The Planning Commission voted 5-3 to forward a negative recommendation to the City Council for the text amendment proposal. o The Planning Commission voted 7-1 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the street vacation proposal as requested by the applicant. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of July 9, 2025 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of July, 9 2025 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1. Ordinance for Public Lands – PL Zoning Text Amendment: Final and Legislative Versions 2. Ordinance for 200 N Street Vacation: Final and Legislative Versions 3. Project Chronology 4. Notice of City Council Hearing 5. Original Petition 6. Public Comment Received After the Planning Commission Staff Report was published 7. Mailing List ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC LANDS – PL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2. ORDINANCE FOR 200 N STREET VACATION 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 5. PETITION INITIATION 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED 7. MAILING LIST This page has intentionally been left blank 3. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00320 – Public Lands Zoning Text Amendment November 6, 2024 Voters of Salt Lake City approved a $730,000,000 general obligation bond to rebuild two high schools, construct an athletic field house, and to make sustainability upgrades at schools and facilities throughout the school district February 18, 2025 The Temporary Land Use Regulations are Adopted by City Council April 2, 2025 The petition for the amendment was initiated by the Salt Lake City Planning Division May 8, 2025 Petitions PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025-00321 were assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. May 15, 2025 Early notification announcement of the project to all recognized community councils, providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Beginning of 45- day input and comment period. June 19, 2025 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted at various library public noticing points city wide. June 29, 2025 End of 45-day Recognized Community Organization notice period. July 9, 2025 Planning Commission holds a public hearing and makes a negative recommendation 5-3 to deny the proposed text amendment. The Commission then votes 7-1 to recommend approval of the proposed street vacation. July 16, 2025 Planning Department requested the official Ordinance language from the City Attorney’s office. July 29, 2025 Ordinance received from City Attorney’s office This page has intentionally been left blank 4. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025- 00321- In response to the passing of the 2024 High School Improvement Bond and the associated temporary land use regulations (TLUR) by the City Council in February of 2025, Mayor Mendenhall is requesting to amend the Public Lands Zoning District. This amendment impacts Chapters 21A.32.070, 21A.36.020, and 21A.34.020 and would make the TLUR adopted by City Council permanent. By doing so, the city’s zoning regulations will be updated to support changes to the PL (Public Lands) zoning district, associated with public schools. The amendments alter building height restrictions, buffering requirements, and allowed uses. Additionally, new construction would be exempt from Historic Landmark Commission review associated with the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Additionally, the second petition is street vacation for an approximately 130- foot-wide and 445-foot-long portion of 200 N between 300 West and 200 West, which is currently incorporated into West High School's campus. This application would vacate public ownership and interest of a portion of the street. As part of their study, the City Council is holding two advertised public hearings to receive comments regarding the petition. During these hearings, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance on the same night of the second public hearing. The hearing will be held electronically: DATE: TIME: PLACE: 451 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held in-person, to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, please visit www.slc.gov/council. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24- Hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 or via e-mail at grant.amann@slcgov.com. The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00320 The City and County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation no later than 48 hours in advance in order to participate in this hearing. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com , 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 7. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIP BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY 440 E 100 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 HALVARD G GRONDAHL; LORINE K GRONDAHL (JT) ONDAHL (JT)239 W 300 N REAR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 RACHEL MARIE OSBORNE RIE OSBORNE 233 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TONI JONES FELTON TRUST 08/12/2022 08/12/2022 229 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JOHN S KEYES OHN S KEYES 225 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JL EATON, LLC EATON, LLC 515 E THIRD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 RITA S LUND RITA S LUND 2784 E CANYON VIEW DR MILLCREEK UT 84109 TYLER PETERSON; ALISON PETERSON (JT) TERSON (JT)257 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 JONATHAN NOVAK; PAULA SENBOUTARATH (JT) TARATH (JT)255 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MARLINDA THOMPSON DA THOMPSON 273 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 NEVA T NIELSEN A T NIELSEN 10168 S REDWOOD RD SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 STH WENDELL, LLC ENDELL, LLC 1415 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BARLEY II LIMITED, LLC IMITED, LLC 186 E DORCHESTER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 BRENDA LYNNETTE STEPHENS; LELAND THOMAS STEPHENS (JT) EPHENS (JT)225 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ANNETTE AIKO HORIUCHI FAMILY TRUST 05/04/2021 05/04/2021267 N 980 E LINDON UT 84042 MARMALADE HILL PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 512 SUGAR PLUM LN NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 CHERRY APTS LLC RY APTS LLC 2855 WASHINGTON BLVD OGDEN UT 84401 VILLAGE MARMALADE, LLC MALADE, LLC 223 W 700 S # 200 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ANGELA M HANNA ELA M HANNA 1101 JACKSON ST OMAHA NE 68102 INSAN 232 NORTH, LLC NORTH, LLC PO BOX 657 VENICE CA 90294 JOHN MAXIM JOHN MAXIM 226 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ALEXANDER DULWICK DER DULWICK 222 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 KRISTA A NABAUM TA A NABAUM 216 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 DELANY KAMMEYER FAMILY TRUST 10/23/1997 10/23/1997256 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MBKU LLC MBKU LLC 1231 MICKEY LANE E MONMOUTH OR 97361 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 251 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HANCOCK LIVING TRUST 04/15/2019 04/15/2019 245 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MCDB2, LLC MCDB2, LLC 923 E EXECUTIVE PARK DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 BROWNSTONE CONDMN COMMON AREA MASTER CARD MASTER CARD5530 RACQUET LANE BOULDER CO 80303 ERIK JOHNSON; JULIE JOHNSON (JT) OHNSON (JT)8630 N HWY 38 HONEYVILLE UT 84314 GUS G CHAUS; KIMBERLY REESE (JT) REESE (JT)11191 S MIDAS TRAIL RD SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 MNS & BJS FM TR & BJS FM TR 166 W 200 N # 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 SCOTT HYER; CHRISTIE POWELL (JT) POWELL (JT)491 ISLAND VIEW CIR FARMINGTON UT 84025 BOSS FAMILY TRUST 4/21/2022 T 4/21/2022 5530 RACQUET LN BOULDER CO 80303 MARMALADES HOA MALADES HOA 208 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CHRISTOPHER KANAAN PHER KANAAN 208 N 200 W 208 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 MASON D BREWER ON D BREWER 208 N 200 W 208 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CAPITOL TWO, LLC OL TWO, LLC 366 DOLORES ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94110 SANE LLC SANE LLC 13830 SAXON LAKE DR JACKSONVILLE FL 32225 BASES LOADED INVESTING, LLC ESTING, LLC 230 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CAMERON SAPPA MERON SAPPA 206 N 200 W 206 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ERIKA PL FINLAYSON TRUST 11/18/2021 11/18/2021 206 N 200 W 206 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 BRIAN D SILKEY AN D SILKEY 206 N 200 W 206 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 COLBY JONES; RACHAEL L JONES (JT) JONES (JT)206 N 200 W 206 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 NORTH TEMPLE ENTERPRISES, LLC PRISES, LLC PO BOX 4697 LOGAN UT 84323 KATSANEVAS ENTERPRISES INC RPRISES INC 118 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 CITY CREEK ASSOCIATES, LLC CIATES, LLC 95 W 100 S #340 LOGAN UT 84321 DANIEL HARRISON BARNES ISON BARNES 1544 E 800 N LEHI UT 84043 JACK B SMITH ACK B SMITH 14641 KING CANYON VICTORVILLE CA 92392 MAVERIK COUNTRY STORES INC STORES INC 185 S STATE ST # 800 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 CORP OF PRES. BISH. OF THE CH OF J C OF LDS J C OF LDS50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 WESTERN ROCKY COMPANY CKY COMPANY 2001 UNION ST # 300 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94123 UTAH DOORS, LLC SERIES 161 SERIES 161 4607 W DAYBREAK PKWY SOUTH JORDAN UT 84009 RIVERDALE COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, LLC LDINGS, LLC 95 W 100 S LOGAN UT 84321 ELIA TULE ELIA TULE 216 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 EUGENE F SASSER NE F SASSER 1765 PEACHTREE ST NE #B3 ATLANTA GA 30309 PIETRA PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 273 N 1550 E LAYTON UT 84040 MARILYN E BRANHAM REVOCABLE TRUST 11/30/2017 11/30/20178203 WHETSTONE RD MOUNTAIN GRV MO 65711 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 14485 SHADOWLANE CT MORGAN HILL CA 95037 ARNOLD L SWINDLEHURST; KAREN A SWINDLEHURST (JT) EHURST (JT)17 WHITMAN CT IRVINE CA 92617 DAVID L NORMAN ID L NORMAN 214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST # E2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 HEIDI NESTEL; STEVE NESTEL TEVE NESTEL 1380 CAPITOL ST OGDEN UT 84401 DANIEL TAYLOR LARKIN YLOR LARKIN 3411 W BOULDEN BLVD BLUFFDALE UT 84065 RACHEL PARKIN CHEL PARKIN 10 FAXON AVE APT 808 QUNICY MA 02169 NATHAN SNOW; MAREN SNOW (JT) N SNOW (JT)214 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ANDRA L LALLI REVOCABLE TRUST 09/05/2006 09/05/20063070 S 950 E BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 401K HOME MOSTLY INC. MOSTLY INC.1474 BLACK STONE AVENUE SAN JOSE CA 95118 MARC KENNEDY ARC KENNEDY PO BOX 802 DRAPER UT 84020 MAREN SNOW; NATHAN SNOW (JT) N SNOW (JT)218 W NORTHTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 A J & M CO LLC & M CO LLC 7875 S 965 E SANDY UT 84094 GARRETT C ZUPAN ETT C ZUPAN 2131 SPRINGSTONE DR LELAND NC 28451 PAUL T BERGERA FAMILY TRUST 04/02/2001 04/02/20012666 S FILMORE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 214 NORTH TEMPLE CONDOMINIUMS AMD COMMON AREA MASTER CARD MASTER 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 CORP OF PRES. BIS. OF THE CH OF J C OF LDS J C OF LDS50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #FL22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 PROPERTY RESERVE, INC ESERVE, INC PO BOX 511196 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84151 Current Occupant 241 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 288 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 270 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 266 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 262 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 267 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 251 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 217 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 279 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 271 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 244 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 276 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 270 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 258 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 240 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 232 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 204 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 243 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 265 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 211 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 220 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 245 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 212 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 231 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 229 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 227 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 171 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 163 W 300 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 268 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 264 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 250 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 242 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 232 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 263 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 257 N QUINCE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 156 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 166 W 200 N 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 208 N 200 W 208 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 208 N 200 W 208 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 206 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 143 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 175 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 308 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 160 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 150 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 144 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 138 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 140 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 140 N 300 W NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 116 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 112 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 102 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 274 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 264 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 250 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 248 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 242 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 230 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 279 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 275 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 261 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 213 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 211 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 209 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 165 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 107 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 206 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 180 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 125 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 133 N 200 W NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 233 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 246 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 161 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 157 N 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 216 W NORTH TEMPLE ST C8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E-1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST E-7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 218 W NORTH TEMPLE ST W8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 214 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 150 W NORTH TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 Current Occupant 131 W 200 N SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 This page has intentionally been left blank 6. PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAS PUBLISHED From: Colin K Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 8:16 AM To: planning@slc.gov; Amann, Grant; Wharton, Chris Subject: (EXTERNAL) Formal Opposition: Zoning Cases PLNPCM2025-00320 & PLNPCM2025-00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Salt Lake City Planning Commission, I am a resident and property owner at 216 N 200 W and a deeply concerned member of the community. I am writing to formally submit my strong opposition to the proposed Zoning Text Amendment (PLNPCM2025-00320) and the Street Vacation (PLNPCM2025-00321) related to the West High School rebuild. These changes will permanently and negatively impact the quality of life and the historic fabric of our neighborhood. My opposition is based on several critical concerns: * **Impact on Neighborhood Traffic and Parking:** We understand that a significant portion of the new parking will be located on the northwest side of the campus, directly adjacent to our residential streets. This will increase traffic, noise, and congestion in our residential areas, impacting the daily lives of families. * **Extreme Building Height and Reduced Setbacks:** The proposal to allow a new school structure up to **125 feet tall** and as close as **30 feet** from our property lines is completely out of scale with the surrounding residential homes. This change will block sunlight, create a massive visual burden, and eliminate privacy for countless residents. * **Abandonment of Historic Preservation Standards:** Granting an exemption from historic preservation review is a severe blow to the integrity of our historic district. The new construction should be required to respect the character of the neighborhood, not be built as a monolithic, incompatible structure that ignores its surroundings. I grew up in this neighborhood. I graduated from West High. I understand the need for a new high school. But Option 3 is not the best option for the neighborhood or the West High Students of the future. Option 3 places the new burdens on the neighborhood, splits the school across an extremely busy street and will have to be redone in future. Spend the money now and do it right. I urge you to deny these petitions and recommend to the City Council that they do not approve these changes. Please prioritize the preservation of our neighborhood over institutional convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Colin Kingsbury Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: LARRY HANCOCK Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 1:24 PM To: Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) Fwd: Case #'s PLNPCM2025-00320/ PLNPCM2025- 00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ---------- Original Message ---------- From: LARRY HANCOCK To: "planning@slc.gov" <planning@slc.gov> Date: 06/30/2025 1:19 PM MDT Subject: Case #'s PLNPCM2025-00320/ PLNPCM2025-00321 I have grave concerns about the rezoning along lower Quince and 2nd west from 2nd north to 3rd north. It is not necessary to ruin the historic nature of this area and i oppose the removal of our historic designation. Sincerely Larry Hancock 245N. Quince Street Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: Marie Leon Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 9:44 PM To: Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) Feedback on Proposed Zoning Changes Near West High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Salt Lake City Planning Division, I recently visited Salt Lake City for the first time, and during my stay, I spent a lot of time exploring the Marmalade neighborhood. I absolutely fell in love with it. The historic homes, the tree-lined streets, the small local shops — it all had such a welcoming, unique character that made it stand out from so many other neighborhoods I’ve visited. While I was there, I happened to notice a flyer about the proposed zoning changes near West High School. Even as a visitor, it caught my attention because one of the things that struck me most during my time in Marmalade was the presence of that beautiful, historic high school. It felt like such an important part of the neighborhood’s identity and history. It honestly made me sad to read that these changes could allow buildings much taller than anything that exists there now, reduce buffers that give the area its open feel, and bypass the historic review process that helps keep neighborhoods like Marmalade so special. I understand that growth and updates are part of every city’s future, but this felt like the kind of change that could alter the neighborhood permanently, and not in a good way. I may not live in Salt Lake City, but I can tell you that neighborhoods like Marmalade are what make a city worth visiting. It would be a real loss to see its historic charm replaced by oversized buildings that don’t reflect the community’s history and character. Thank you for taking the time to hear feedback from a visitor who left with a real appreciation for what makes your city so special. I hope you will protect the unique feel of Marmalade as you make decisions about this proposal. Sincerely, Marie California Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From: Marlinda Thompson Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 10:49 AM To: planning@slc.gov; Amann, Grant Subject: (EXTERNAL) PLNPCM2025-00320 and PLNPCM2025-00321 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. Attention: This is regarding the building of the West High School specifically and the height and set- back distance of the new structures. I live close to where the proposed new structures will be constructed. I have lived in the neighborhood for 25 years and I do not want such significant changes. Please do not allow buildings to be built that would tower over my home and the rest of the homes by what—6 times their height? And 30 feet is much too close. This is where I live; this is where I walk; this is where I meet and talk with my neighbors. I do not want to live in the shadow of tall buildings. This is a quaint neighborhood with historic homes and buildings. Please, let us preserve these homes and buildings and historical significance. Perhaps we could build on the existing block and building where West High is located at a reduced height. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. Marlinda Thompson This page has intentionally been left blank 5. PETITION INITIATION REQUEST This page has intentionally been left blank 2. ORDINANCE FOR 200 N STREET VACATION: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Closing the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West) An ordinance vacating the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00321. WHEREAS, the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West, as legally described on Exhibit A (“Right-of-Way”), is not presently used for travel or as a public right-of-way, rather it is primarily serving as West High School’s track and field; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Section 10-9a-609.5 establishes the power for cities to vacate public rights of way subject to certain procedures, which have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on July 9, 2025 to consider a petition initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall to vacate the Right-of-Way pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00321; and WHEREAS, at its July 9, 2025 meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation of the Right-of-Way, and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating Right-of-Way. That the western portion of the street known as 200 North between 200 West and 300 West, which right-of-way is as legally described on Exhibit A, is hereby vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. The Right-of-Way is hereby converted to a parcel of land, to be within the Public Lands – PL Zoning District. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2025. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2025. Published: ______________. Ordinance vacating 200 N between 200-300 Wv1 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 29, 2025 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of Portion of 200 North to be vacated: Beginning at point that is S 89°52’42” E 530 feet along the south line of Block 103 and from the Southwest Corner of Lot 2, Block 103, Plat ‘A’ Salt Lake City Survey; S 0°01’06” E 6.11 feet; thence S 89°56’56” W 31.71 feet; thence along a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 60.44 feet and a curve length of 90.45 feet s chord bearing of S 44°16’59” W and chord distance of 82.24 feet to a line of tangency; thence S 0°24’51” W 66 feet; thence S 89°58’50” E 90.81 feet along the north line of Lots 7 & 8, Block 96, Plat ‘A’ Salt Lake City Survey; thence N 0°01’06” W 124.80 feet along the east line of the West High School lease parcel to the Salt Lake City School Board and to the point of beginning. Area 10,405 SQ. FT. or 0.240 Acres This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE FOR PUBLIC LANDS – PL ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT: FINAL AND LEGISLATIVE VERSIONS V1 1 Project Title: K-12 Public School Development Standards in the PL District Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00320 Version: 1 Date Prepared: July 29, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Not Recommended 7/9/2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only):  Amends Title 21A to permanently incorporate the K-12 development standards adopted earlier this year through a temporary land use regulation.  Amends the development standards for K-12 public schools in the PL district to facilitate the construction of new high schools.  Exempts K-12 Public uses and their accessory uses from the standards in the Historic Preservation Overlay District. Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. All other text is existing with no proposed change.   1 1. Amending Section 21A.32.070 as follows: 2 3 21A.32.070: PL PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT 4 A. Purpose Statement: The purpose of the PL Public Lands District is to specifically delineate areas 5 of public use and to control the potential redevelopment of public uses, lands and facilities. This district is 6 appropriate in areas of the City where the applicable master plans support this type of land use. 7 B. Uses: Uses in the PL Public Lands District, as specified in sSection 21A.33.070, "Table Of 8 Permitted And Conditional Uses For Special Purpose Districts", of this title, are permitted subject to the 9 general provisions set forth in sSection 21A.32.010 of this chapter and this section. 10 C. Minimum Lot Area Aand Lot Width: 11 12 Land Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Width Public schools 5 acres 150 feet Other permitted uses 20,000 square feet 75 feet 13 D. Maximum Building Height: 14 1. Local government facilities, prison or jail, government offices, arenas, stadiums, fairgrounds and 15 exhibition halls: Seventy five feet (75') 75 feet; provided, that where abutting a zoning district 16 allowing greater height, the height standard of the abutting district shall apply. 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___________________________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney July 29, 2025 V1 2 2. Schools, K-12 Public: 125 feet 18 3. Other uses: 35 Thirty-five feet (35'). 19 E. Minimum Yard Requirements: 20 1. Public School Schools, K-12 Public: when a site for a public school includes multiple parcels or 21 lots, setbacks shall apply to the perimeter of the site and to property lines shared between the school 22 district and a different property owner. 23 a. Front Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 24 b. Corner Side Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 25 c. Interior Side Yard: 26 i. Buildings next to a residential or manufacturing zoning district: Fifty 50 feet (50'). 27 ii. Buildings next to any other zoning district: 30 feet 28 d. Rear Yard: One hundred feet (100'). 29 i. Buildings next to a residential or manufacturing zoning district: Fifty 50 feet (50'). 30 ii. Buildings next to any other zoning district: 30 feet 31 2. Other Uses: 32 a. Front Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 33 b. Corner Side Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 34 c. Interior Side Yard: Twenty 20 feet (20'). 35 d. Rear Yard: 30 Thirty feet (30'). 36 3. Accessory Buildings Aand Structures Iin Yards: Accessory buildings and structures may be 37 located in required yard areas subject to sSection 21A.36.020, tTable 21A.36.020B of this title. 38 F.Required Landscape Yards: All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscaped yards in 39 conformance with the requirements of cChapter 21A.48 of this title. 40 G. Landscape Buffers: When a lot in the PL Public Lands District abuts a lot in a Ssingle-Ffamily or 41 Ttwo-Ffamily Rresidential Ddistrict, landscape buffers, in accordance with the requirements of 42 cChapter 21A.48 of this title, shall be required. 43 H. Modifications for Schools, K-12 Public: In accordance with Utah Code 10-9a-305 the planning 44 director may modify a regulation set forth in this zoning district or that applies to the zoning district 45 when located elsewhere in this title, if the modification does not negatively impact the health or safety 46 of the general public or occupants of a K-12 Public School. The planning director may consult other 47 city departments when determining if a modification negatively impacts the health or safety of the 48 general public or building occupants. 49 50 2. Amending Subsection 21A.34.020.B as follows: 51 V1 3 52 B. Applicability: All properties located within the boundaries of a local historic, part of a thematic 53 designation, or designated as a landmark site are subject to the requirements of this chapter. 54 1. Applicable Standards: The applicable standards of this chapter are determined by the historic status 55 rating of the property, either contributing or noncontributing, as identified in the most recent historic 56 resource survey on file with the Salt Lake City Planning Division or a historic status determination 57 issued in accordance with Subsection 21A.34.020.D. 58 2. Exceptions: School, K-12 Public uses and their accessory uses are exempt from any provisions in 59 Section 21A.34.020 Historic Preservation Overlay District 60 61 3. Amending Subsection 21A.36.020.B as follows: 62 63 B. Obstructions In Required Yards: Accessory uses and structures, and projections of the principal 64 structure, may be located in a required yard only as indicated ("X") in table 21A.36.020B of this 65 section. No portion of an obstruction authorized in table 21A.36.020B of this section shall extend 66 beyond the authorized projection. Dimensions shall be measured from the finished surface of the 67 building or structure. 68 69 [note to codifier: Table 21A.36.020B Obstructions in Required Yards, along with the Notes thereto, 70 remains in this portion of the subsection and is unaffected by this amendment – a new subsection 1 71 follows the tables and notes] 72 73 1. Allowed obstructions in required yards for Schools, K-12 Public: 74 a. All yards: 75 (1) Parking stalls, vehicle drive aisles, and circulation elements necessary for the safe and 76 efficient movement of people, bicycles, and vehicles. Curb cut locations, width, spacing and 77 total number of curb cuts shall be determined by the Transportation Director on streets with 78 city jurisdiction and the Utah Department of Transportation on streets under state jurisdiction. 79 (2) Playground equipment and structures are allowed in any required yard. 80 (3) Athletic fields and courts, including necessary accessory buildings to support the athletic 81 facility. Bleachers over 20 feet in height shall be setback a minimum of 50 feet from a 82 property line that is shared with a residential land use. 83 b. Any other obstruction allowed in 21A.36.020 Conformance with Lot and Bulk Controls. 84 85 4. Effective Date. If adopted this text amendment will become effective on the date of its first publication. 86 This page has intentionally been left blank Item F1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 WWW.SLC.GOV/COUNCIL TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Kate Werrett, Budget and Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE: Station Area Plan Exceptions MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Council approve a resolution recognizing the impracticability findings for certain transit station area plans so that the City may request a Wasatch Front Regional Council exception for said station area plans. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/25/2025 Date Sent to Council: 09/30/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Norris, Nick E-mail nick.norris@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 09/29/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 09/29/2025 Subject: Resolution supporting an exception from Utah Code regarding adopting station area plans Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the resolution so the city can seek an exception from the Wasatch Front Regional Council regarding station area plan requirements in Utah Code. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Not required This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Utah Code section 10-9a-403.1 Station Area Plans, requires the city to adopt Station Area Plans (SAPs) for all fixed guideway public transit stations located within the boundaries of the city. Furthermore, the code requires an SAP for fixed guideway public transit stations that are located outside of the boundaries of the city if the ½ mile radius of the station extends into the city. Utah Code provides exceptions to the SAP requirements in section 10-9a-403.1(2)(b)(ii) when: (A) the municipality has determined that conditions exist that make satisfying a portion or all of the requirements of Subsection (2)(a) for a station area impracticable, including conditions that relate to existing development, entitlements, land ownership, land uses that make opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment infeasible, environmental limitations, market readiness, development impediment conditions, or other similar conditions; and (B) the municipality adopts a resolution describing the conditions that exist to make satisfying the requirements of Subsection (2)(a) impracticable. There are six stations that Salt Lake City is required to produce a station area plan for, but for various reasons it is impracticable to do so. These stations include: 1. Airport 2. Stadium 3. Central Campus 4. Fort Douglas 5. University of Utah Medical Center 6. River Trail (located in West Valley City, but some portions of the ½ mile radius is within Salt Lake) When seeking an exception due to impracticability, the city council is required to adopt a resolution describing the conditions that make satisfying the requirements of the state code impracticable. The Planning Division has reviewed the station areas around each station and determined that creating a station area plan for these stations is impracticable. The attached report outlines the reasons for each station. PUBLIC PROCESS: A public process is not required. EXHIBITS: 1) Resolution 2) Exceptions to Station Area Plans Report This page has intentionally been left blank 1. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION _____ OF 2025 FINDING OF IMPRACTICABILITY TO ADOPT STATION AREA PLANS FOR CERTAIN TRANSIT STATIONS WITHIN SALT LAKE CITY OR WITHIN ½ MILE OF THE SALT LAKE CITY BOUNDARY WHEREAS, Utah Code 10-9a-403.1 requires cities to adopt station area plans for each transit station that is located within the city or within ½ mile radius of the city; and WHEREAS, Utah Code Subsection 10.9a.403.1(2)(b)(ii) provides a process for cities to determine that certain conditions exists that make satisfying a portion or all of the requirements of Utah Code Subsection 10-9a-403.1(2)(a) impracticable; and WHEREAS, the Airport, Stadium, Central Campus, Fort Douglas, and University of Utah Medical Center are located within Salt Lake City; and WHEREAS, all land within a ½ mile radius from the Airport station is surrounded by airport facilities and it is impracticable to support the objectives for station area plans outlined in Utah Code Subsection 10.91.403.1; and WHEREAS, nearly all the land within ½ mile radius of the Central Campus, Fort Douglas, and University of Utah Medical Center stations is considered state lands that are not subject to Salt Lake City’s general plan, moderate income housing plans, or land use regulations and is therefore impracticable for the city to adopt a station area plan for these stations; and WHEREAS, the majority of the land surrounding the Stadium Station is state or federally protected land that is not subject to Salt Lake City’s general plan, moderate income housing plans, or land use regulations and the remainder of the land is all developed, within a national and local historic district, already zoned for mixed housing types and is therefore impracticable for the city to adopt a station area plan for this station; and WHEREAS, the River Trail station is located outside of the boundaries of Salt Lake City but within a ½ mile radius of the city where SR-201, a limited access highway, separates the River station from the land within Salt Lake City and therefore adopting a station area plan for the land within Salt Lake City that is within ½ mile radius of the station is impracticable; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that conditions exist that make satisfying a portion or all of the requirements of Utah Code Subsection 10-9a-403.1(2)(a) for the Airport, Stadium, Central Campus, Fort Douglas, University of Utah Medical Center, and River Station impracticable due to existing development, land ownership, state land exemptions from city’s general plans and zoning codes, existing entitlements, and other factors as outlined in attachment A; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah that the City Council hereby certifies that adopting station area plans for the Airport, Stadium, Central Campus, Fort Douglas, University of Utah Medical Center, and River Station impracticable as set forth in Utah Code Subsection 10-9a-403.1(2)(b)(ii). Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ___ day of _____________, 2025. ______________________________________ CHRIS WHARTON, CHAIR ATTEST: _________________________ CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___9/25/25_________________________ By: ___________________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank 2. EXCEPTIONS TO STATION AREA PLAN REPORT Exceptions to Station Area Plan Requirements September 25, 2025 Nick Norris, Planning Director Department of Community and Neighborhoods 2 Introduction Utah Code section 10-9a-403.1 Station Area Plans, requires the city to adopt Station Area Plans (SAPs) for all fixed guideway public transit stations located within the boundaries of the city. Furthermore, the code requires an SAP for fixed guideway public transit stations that are located outside of the boundaries of the city if the ½ mile radius of the station extends into the city. Utah Code provides exceptions to the SAP requirements in section 10-9a-403.1(2)(b)(ii) when: (A) the municipality has determined that conditions exist that make satisfying a portion or all of the requirements of Subsection (2)(a) for a station area impracticable, including conditions that relate to existing development, entitlements, land ownership, land uses that make opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment infeasible, environmental limitations, market readiness, development impediment conditions, or other similar conditions; and (B) the municipality adopts a resolution describing the conditions that exist to make satisfying the requirements of Subsection (2)(a) impracticable. Salt Lake City is seeking an exception to the requirement to develop SAPs under this section for the following stations located within Salt Lake City, or include a station area where only a portion of the land is within Salt Lake City: • Airport • Stadium • Central Campus • Fort Douglas • University of Utah Medical Center • River Trail (located in West Valley City) The following analysis identifies the factors that make creating and adopting a station area plan impracticable for each station identified above. Each of these stations have several conditions that would impact the effectiveness and need for Salt Lake City to adopt a SAP. Summary Table of Stations and Justification for Exceptions Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other Airport  Stadium  Central Campus  Fort Douglas   (located in WVC) 3 Airport Station The Airport Station serves the Salt Lake City International Airport. The station is located just east of the public entrance to the main terminal building. The ½ mile station area for this location would fall entirely within the operating boundaries of the Salt Lake City International Airport. This makes realizing any of the objectives for a station area plan in Utah Code 10-9a- 403.1(7) and 10-9a.403.1(8) impracticable. 4 The factors considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for station area plans are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other Airport        1. Existing Development: the entirety of the station area is located within the operational area of the Salt Lake City International Airport and there is no opportunity for other development. 2. Entitlements: all the land within the station area boundary is land used by the airport and there is no opportunity to entitle land for other uses desired in a SAP other than employment. 3. Land Ownership: all the land within the station area boundary is owned by Salt Lake City Corporation for the sole purpose of operating the airport. Much of the land is restricted to airport-supportive land uses. 4. Environmental Limitations: the air and noise pollution generated by the airport is not conducive to residential land uses and it is not appropriate for residential land uses to be located within the station area. 5. Market Readiness: the land is public land used exclusively for the operations and ancillary needs of the airport. It cannot be marketed for other types of development. 6. Development Impediments: All land within ½ mile from the station is used for airport operations and justifiably impedes other types of development. 5 Stadium Station The Stadium station is located on the edge of the University of Utah, adjacent to the University Local Historic District. Approximately half of the land within this station area is occupied by institutional uses on land that is not subject to local land use regulations or that is deed- restricted by the federal government for specific uses. The remaining land in the station area is in a national historic district and about one quarter of the land is within a local historic district. National district designation provides financial benefits for property owners to maintain the historic nature of their property. Local district designation requires landowners to obtain approvals for any exterior change to the property and prohibits the demolition of historic buildings except when prohibiting demolition results in a regulatory taking of private property. 6 The factors that were considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for SAPs are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other Stadium      1. Existing Development: Nearly all the land within ½ mile radius is developed or not subject to the city’s general plan or land use regulations because it is state land or federally restricted land. About 50% of the land is in a national historic district, with half of that land in a local historic district. This limits the ability and desirability of redeveloping land in the area. Despite this, the land that is subject to the city’s zoning regulations include nearly 3,000 dwelling units with densities as high as 190 dwelling units per acre on some blocks. 2. Entitlements: Entitlement to increase the density would be limited to those properties that do not contain a historic building. Half of the land is not subject to local land use regulations and is owned by the University of Utah. Some of the land includes deed restrictions established by the United States Government when the land was transferred from federal ownership to private ownership. The deed restrictions restrict the use to the current uses and would require federal legislation to change. 3. Land Ownership: Most of the area consists of relatively small parcels (under 7,000 square feet). As a result, there are hundreds of property owners of small lots that make it challenging to assemble land to building higher densities. 4. Existing Land Uses: Due to the existing land uses and development patterns, opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment are infeasible. The institutional uses on the eastern half of the station area make redevelopment infeasible because the lands are occupied by the University of Utah, a private cemetery, and private educational facilities that are unlikely to change or that are not subject to local land use regulations, which makes implementation by the City impracticable. 5. Other: Less than 180 acres of land within the ½ mile radius is subject to the city’s general plan and development regulations. Approximately 77% of the land is public rights of way, state owned or federally restricted land. There is less than one acre of undeveloped land within the station area. The limits on the applicability of the zoning regulations makes it impracticable to achieve all of the objectives required in Utah Code 10-9a-403.1 for station area plans. 7 Central Campus Station Area The Central Campus Station is located on South Campus Drive on the University of Utah Campus. Nearly all the station area is occupied by the University of Utah, the LDS Church Institute, the Federal Government, or public recreation facilities. The exceptions are small pieces where private student housing has been built and is under construction. Only the properties owned by the LDS Church are subject to city zoning regulations. 8 The factors considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for SAPs are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other Central Campus      1. Existing Development: Nearly all the land within the station area is occupied by the University of Utah or the Federal Government. The land that is not Federal or Utah land contains student housing that is under construction, religious uses, and recreational facilities owned by Salt Lake City. 2. Entitlements: There is no private land that can be entitled beyond the current entitlement within the station area. The city cannot entitle development on land that is not subject to the city’s plans or land use regulations. 3. Land Ownership: The only land in the station area not owned and occupied by a public institution or a religious institution is a student housing project that was recently completed. This land is also deed restricted for student housing. 4. Existing Land Uses: Land uses that make opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment infeasible. The land in the station area is occupied by large institutional land uses that are not likely to change in the future. 5. Development Impediments: Items 1-4 above all create development impediments. 9 Fort Douglas Station The Fort Douglas Station is located on the eastern side of the University of Utah Campus on Mario Capecchi Drive. Nearly 100 percent of the land within ½ mile of this station is owned by the University of Utah or the Federal Government, except for a small piece that is currently under construction for student housing and land owned by the LDS church. 10 The factors considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for SAPs are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other Fort Douglas      1. Existing Development: Nearly all the land within the station area is occupied by the University of Utah or the Federal Government. The land that is not Federal or Utah land contains student housing that is under construction, religious uses, and recreational facilities owned by Salt Lake City. 2. Entitlements: There is no private land that can be entitled beyond the current entitlement within the station area. The city cannot entitle development on land that is not subject to the city’s plans or land use regulations. 3. Land Ownership: The only land in the station area not owned and occupied by a public institution or a religious institution is a student housing project that was recently completed. This land is also deed restricted for student housing. 4. Existing Land Uses: Land uses that make opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment infeasible. The land in the station area is occupied by large institutional land uses that are not likely to change in the future. 5. Development Impediments: Items 1-4 above all create development impediments. 11 University of Utah Medical Center The University of Utah Medical Center Station is located on Mario Capecchi Drive and approximately 50 South. The station primarily serves the University of Utah Hospital, medical campus, Primary Children’s Hospital, and student housing located on portions of land formerly occupied by Fort Douglas. Approximately 4o acres of land is privately owned in the Federal Heights Neighborhood. Smaller amounts of land are owned by Salt Lake City Public Utilities. 12 The factors considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for SAPs are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environmental Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other U of U Medical      1. Existing Development: Nearly all the land within the station area is occupied by the University of Utah. The private land is occupied by single family homes and institutional uses. 2. Entitlements: There is no private land that can be entitled beyond the current entitlement within the station area. The city cannot entitle development on land that is not subject to the city’s plans or land use regulations. 3. Land Ownership: the only land in the station area not owned and occupied by a public institution is in a developed neighborhood with no opportunity for redevelopment to different land uses. 4. Existing Land Uses: Land uses that make opportunities for new development and long-term redevelopment infeasible. The land in the station area is occupied by large institutional land uses that are not likely to change in the future. The private land in the station area has been subdivided into relatively large, single-family dwellings that are not likely to be redeveloped into a different type of land use. 5. Development Impediments: Items 1-4 create impediments for development. 13 River Trail Station The River Trail Station is located at approximately 2320 South and 1070 West located in West Valley City. Less than 6% of the land within the ½ mile station area is located within Salt Lake City. SR 201 separates the land within Salt Lake City boundaries and the River Trail Station, with the only connection a portion of the Jordan River Parkway Trail. The length of the trail from the station to the closest point in Salt Lake City is approximately 0.7 miles. This is 14 generally outside of the distance that is considered walking distance to transit and is greater than the ½ mile radius distance from the station. The factors considered in determining if it is impracticable to meet the objectives required for SAPs are as follows: Station Existing Development Entitlements Land Ownership Existing land Uses Environment al Limitations Market Readiness Development Impediments Other River Trail (located in      1. Existing Development: The location of SR-201 separates the station from the land that is located within Salt Lake City. In addition, all the land within Salt Lake City is already developed. 2. Existing Land Uses: All the land that is in Salt Lake City and within the ½ mile radius of the station is currently developed as light industrial and manufacturing. The zoning of the land does allow housing, and a townhome development has been approved on the north side of 2100 South but has not been constructed. The land on the south side of 2100 South is not likely to be redeveloped in the future. The proximity and impact of SR-201 make the area less than ideal for housing and unlikely to benefit from being within ½ mile of the station due to SR-201 blocking connectivity. Area highlighted in blue in the above image is within Salt Lake City 15 3. Environmental Limitations: The Jordan River and the Salt Lake Surplus Canal runs through the station area. The Surplus Canal is a Salt Lake County Flood Control facility that prevents the Jordan River from flooding and includes a levee to reduce the risk of flooding. The toe of the levee encroaches onto private property in some locations within the station area, which requires an additional setback from the levee. The Jordan River requires a 50-foot setback from the high-water line of the river, which restricts land from being furthered developed, and an additional 50 feet of setback that limits development. 4. Development Impediments: The development of the land that is within Salt Lake City is separated from the River Trail Station by SR 201, a limited accessway freeway that prohibits the connection of surface streets to the station. The only connection is a segment of the Jordan River Trail that would result in 0.7 mile walk from where the trail intersects 2100 South. This is generally considered outside of the distance that someone is willing to walk to access transit. The lack of connectivity to the station is an impediment that limits new development from being considered “transit-oriented” and taking advantage of being within walking distance of transit and limits mobility within and through the station area. The area lacks any sort of street connectivity, with only 2100 South and 1040 West (a local street) running through the station area within the city. 5. Other: Vehicle Infrastructure: The presence of SR-201 significantly impacts the ability of any future development within SLC in this station area from taking advantage of the proximity to the River Trail Station. The SR-201 right of way is over 200 feet wide in this area and creates significant air and noise pollution. This creates an inhospitable condition for residential use and is not an appropriate location for high density housing. The impact of SR-201 would prevent the city from developing a station area plan that satisfies the following objectives found in Utah Code 10-9a-403.1(7) • Promote sustainable environmental conditions; • Enhance access to opportunities; and • Increase transportation choices and connections. This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Kate Werrett Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE:Parking Dimensions and Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE To align with S.B. 181 and H.B. 368, the Planning Division has reviewed the existing Off-Street Parking Standards Manual, recommended changes, and proposed that these updated standards be codified, as required by state code. State code requires that these amendments be codified by December 31, 2025. The purpose of the State’s legislation is to help reduce overall construction costs, thus making housing more attainable. Goal of the briefing: Receive details regarding changes to existing parking standards as required by state code. At a future meeting, Council will adopt these changes to City zoning and the Off Street Parking Manual. ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION The following summarizes the specific updates and clarifications proposed to the City’s Zoning Code and Off- Street Parking Standards Manual. These changes reflect the necessary revisions to align local regulations with S.B. 181 and H.B. 368: Zoning Code Changes - Allow tandem parking for all uses to align with S.B. 181 - If driveway parking leads to at least one stall behind the front line of the building, the driveway counts toward the required parking for single-family, two-family, townhome, and rowhouse dwellings - Defines “unobstructed” Off Street Parking Manual Changes - Allow tandem parking for all uses to align with S. B. 181 - Stylistic edits and updated references Items NOT Changing - Parking minimums - Landscaping, screening, and lighting standards - Surfacing standards and materials - Driveway standards Project Timeline: 1st Briefing: October 18, 2025 Public Hearing: December 2, 2025 Tentative Action: December 9, 2025, or later Page | 2 - ADA standards - Parking standards for existing homes The Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council with a clarification to the existing language that “when a tandem parking space is being used to fulfill the requirement for parking based on a residential use, each of the two tandem parking stalls shall be designated for a specific residential” [unit], or substantively similar text. The Planning Division has incorporated this recommended revision into the proposed zoning and parking manual amendments to be considered by the Council. ATTACHMENTS 1)Parking Dimensions and Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update 2) Impacted Existing Documents: a)Off-Street Parking Standards Manual b)21A.44 (particular sections: 21A.44.060.A.3 & 21A.44.060.A.15) c)21A.62 3) Utah Code a)S.B. 181 b)H.B. 368 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council Briefing-November 18, 2025 PLNPCM2025-00358 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT// PARKING DIMENSIONS OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS MANUAL UPDATE Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning OVERVIEW This amendment updates Salt Lake City’s parking regulations to ensure consistency with recently adopted state laws, S.B 181 and H.B. 368, pertaining to barriers parking may have on housing affordability. Compliance deadline of December 31, 2025. State Law Scope: •Formally adopt Off-Street Parking Standards Manual •Update tandem and driveway parking regulations •Amend Zoning Code Section 21A.44.060 Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY CHANGES Zoning Ordinance Changes: •Allows tandem parking for all land uses (21A.44.060.A.16) •Allows driveway parking to count toward the required minimum parking for single-family, two-family, rowhouse, and townhome uses. The driveway must lead to at least one space behind the building front line of the building. (21A.44.060) •Defines 'unobstructed' in the definitions chapter (21A.62) Off-Street Parking Manual: •Codifies the off-street parking manual •Allows tandem parking for all land uses •Stylistic and reference edits Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning PARKING BEHIND THE FRONT LINE OF THE BUILDING TANDEM PARKING Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHAT IS NOT CHANGING •Parking Dimensions •Parking Minimums •Landscaping, Screening & Lighting Standards •Surfacing Standards or Materials •Driveway Width Standards •ADA Standards •Parking Standards for Existing Homes Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning STANDARDS OF APPROVAL 21A.50.050: STANDARDS FOR GENERAL AMENDMENTS •Evaluates alignment with city's purpose, goals, objectives, and policies •Reviews compliance with zoning ordinance and district regulations •Ensures amendment implements current best practices in urban planning and design •Assesses impact on city resources •Assesses impact on adjacent properties Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS AND OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS MANUAL. STAFF RECOMMENDATION •No anticipated detrimental impacts •Generally, meets zoning standards •Complies with State Law Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Meagan Booth // Principal Planner meagan.booth@slc.gov 801-535-7213 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/06/2025 Date Sent to Council: 10/15/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Booth, Meagan E-mail meagan.booth@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 10/08/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 10/15/2025 Subject: Zoning Text Amendment-Citywide, Text Amendment-PLNPCM2025-00358 - Parking Dimensions & Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update Additional Staff Contact: Meagan Booth, Principal Planner Presenters/Staff Table Meagan Booth, Principal Planner Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed text amendment as presented. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process See Project Chronology This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a zoning text amendment to allow driveway parking to count toward the minimum required off-street parking for single-family, two-family, townhome, and rowhouse dwellings and to allow tandem parking for all land uses. This change aligns the City’s zoning code and Off-Street Parking Standards Manual with 2025 state legislation (SB 181 and HB 368), which limits local regulation of parking design and requires engineering standards to be codified. The proposed amendments will affect 21A.44.060.A.3, 21A.44.060.A.15, and 21A.62 of the zoning ordinance, as well as the Off-Street Parking Standards Manual. The changes include allowing driveway parking to count toward minimum off-street parking requirements for single-family, two-family, townhome, and rowhouse dwellings, provided the driveway leads to at least one parking stall behind the front line of the building. Tandem parking will also count toward the minimum off-street parking for all land uses. Additionally, we are adding the term 'unobstructed' to the definitions chapter as defined by State law. Tandem parking is defined as the in-line parking of one vehicle behind another in such a way that one parking space can only be accessed through another parking space. Under current standards in Salt Lake City Code §21A.44.060, tandem parking is permitted for residential uses in all zoning districts that require off-street parking and may count toward minimum parking requirements when both spaces serve the same dwelling unit. The proposed amendment expands this allowance to permit tandem parking for all land uses in all zones, allowing tandem spaces to count toward the required off-street parking requirement regardless of the land use type. This change provides greater design flexibility, supports more compact and efficient site layouts, and aligns with the City’s goals of promoting adaptable parking design and reduced impervious surface area. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal on September 10, 2025, and recommended approval of the amendment to the City Council, with the condition that the language be clarified to specify that tandem parking for residential units must be assigned to a specific unit. The revised ordinance now states that tandem parking is permitted for all uses; however, for residential dwellings, each tandem arrangement must be assigned to a specific unit. PUBLIC PROCESS: • July 1, 2025 - All community councils were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. Staff presented an overview of the project to the Ballpark Community Council on August 7, 2025. No comments were submitted by the Community Councils after the presentation. • An online open house was posted on the Planning Divisions Webpage. • September 10, 2025 The Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council, with an amendment to Section 15, Subsection B: "If a tandem parking space is used to meet residential parking requirements, each tandem stall must be assigned to a specific residential unit, or similar language." Planning Staff has added these changes to the revised ordinance for the City Council. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of September 10, 2025 b) PC Minutes of September 10, 2025 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of September 10, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY 2. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING 3. ORIGINAL PETITION 4. ORDINANCE This page has intentionally been left blank PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00358 April 10, 2025 The Mayor signed the petition to initiate the application. April 11, 2023 Petition PLNPCM2023-00496 was assigned to Meagan Booth, Principal Planner and accepted by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. April 11, 2025 Application was routed internally for department comments. July 1, 2025 After revisions were incorporated to the text and manual the required 45-day notice sent to all Recognized Community Organizations citywide. The early engagement period officially began. No formal comments received. July 8, 2025 Project posted on the City’s Online Open House webpage to solicit public comments. None received August 7, 2025 Community Council Review completed. Presentation given to the Ballpark Community Council. Requested by Amy J. Hawkins, Chair, several councils coordinated to use this meeting date due to July holiday conflicts; Ballpark hosted the presentation at 7 pm. No additional comments were received afterwards. August 15, 2025 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. August 25, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report was posted. August 29, 2025 Planning Commission Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. Public hearing posted on City and State websites; distributed via Planning Division list serve. September 10, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing is held and makes a recommendation for approval with one condition. September 11, 2025 Draft Ordinance sent to the Attorney’s Office September 30, 2025 Final Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00358 for a Zoning Text Amendment. Mayor Erin Mendenhall has initiated a zoning text amendment to clarify driveway parking eligibility for single family, two-family, and townhome-type dwellings, expand tandem parking allowances, and update parking space dimensions to align with current engineering standards. This proposed amendment is in response to SB 181, which limits local regulations of parking design, and HB 368, which requires local engineering standards to be codified by ordinance. The proposed amendments will affect 21A.44.060.A.3, 21A.44.060.A.15, and 21A.62 of the zoning ordinance, as well as the Off-Street Parking Standards Manual. As part of the process, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: TBD PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Meagan Booth at 801-535-7213 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at meagan.booth@slc.gov . The application details can be accessed at https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2022-01120. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406 WWW.SLC.GOV PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 TEL 801-535-7757 FAX 801-535-6174 PLANNING DIVISION DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY and NEIGHBORHOODS MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Erin Mendenhall Cc: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff; Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer; Tammy Hunsaker, Department of Community and Neighborhoods Director; Michaela Oktay, Deputy Planning Director. From: Nick Norris, Planning Director Date: April 9, 2025 Re: Initiation of an amendment to the parking manual and zoning code to update parking dimensions and allowance for low-scale residential uses. The Planning Division is requesting that you initiate an amendment to the city’s adopted Off-Street Parking Standards Manual and to the Zoning Code aligning with recently adopted state laws. The changes are related to parking stall dimensions and allowances for single-family, two-family and townhome-type dwellings. Off-Street Parking Standards Manual changes The amendment to this manual will allow tandem parking for townhomes and reduce certain parking stall dimensions for single-family, two-family and townhome-type dwellings. These changes were recently adopted by the state in S.B. 181 Housing Affordability Amendments. It adopts changes made to the manual since its 2022 adoption in 2022 and as part of the off-street parking chapter re-write. The manual was initially created as an administrative living document but state law H.B. 368 Local Land Use Amendments, now requires an “engineering or development standard” to follow a legislative process. Zoning Code changes The amendment to the ordinance (21A.44.060: Parking Location and Design) will allow driveway parking to count towards the required number of stalls when the use of the property is single-family, two-family or a townhome-type dwelling. The changes may include additional provisions such as a requirement that the driveway leads to at least one stall behind the front façade of the building. This amendment will align the parking standards with city goals and address state law. While the aforementioned changes are the focus, other inconsistencies identified, or changes needed in 21A or to the Parking Standards Manual may also be included in the final proposal. A public process will be conducted, and the proposal will follow the required steps of any other text amendment, including notification to recognized community organizations, a public hearing with the Planning Commission and a decision by City Council. This memo includes a signature block to initiate the petition if that is the decided course of action. If the decided course of action is not to initiate the application, the signature block can remain blank. Please notify the Planning Division when the memo is signed or if the decision is made not to initiate the petition. Page 2 Please contact me at ext. 6173 or nick.norris@slcgov.com if you have any questions. Thank you. Concurrence to initiate the zoning text amendment petition as noted above. Erin Mendenhall, Mayor Date Erin Mendenhall (Apr 10, 2025 15:00 MDT) 04/10/2025 Parking Dimensions - Petition Initiation_4.9.25 Final Audit Report 2025- 04-10 Created:2025-04-10 By:Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) Status:Signed Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAaJYoLbh7AzlAvUgHSFAWyAMksTvvcgh3 Parking Dimensions - Petition Initiation_4.9.25" History Document created by Michaela Oktay (michaela.oktay@slc.gov) 2025-04-10 - 3:21:08 PM GMT Document emailed to Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) for signature 2025-04-10 - 3:21:33 PM GMT Email viewed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) 2025-04-10 - 3:21:59 PM GMT Document e-signed by Erin Mendenhall (erin.mendenhall@slc.gov) Signature Date: 2025-04-10 - 9:00:36 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed. 2025-04-10 - 9:00:36 PM GMT This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Project Title: Parking Dimensions & Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00358 Version: 1 Date Prepared: September 25, 2025 Planning Commission Action: Recommended September 10, 2025 This proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only): • Modifies Subsection 21A.44.060.A.3:to amend the requirements to the parking manual and zoning code to update parking dimensions and allowance for low-scale residential uses. • Amends the Off-Street Parking Standards Manual and Zoning Code (21A.44.060) to align with recent state legislation. Zoning Code (21A.44.060): • Allows tandem parking for all uses (21A.44.060). • Counts driveway parking toward required parking if the driveway leads to at least one stall behind the front line of the building for single-family, two-family, rowhouse, and townhome uses (21A.44.060). • Defines 'unobstructed' in 21A.62 Off-Street Parking Standards Manual: • Allows tandem parking for all uses. • Aligns the manual with House Bill 368 and codifies parking dimensions after City Council adoption. • Incorporates departmental comments. • Makes minor editorial and reference updates for consistency. Planning Note: This proposed text amendment is contingent upon the adoption and codification of the Commercial and Mixed-Use Zoning District Consolidation. The Mixed-Use (MU) zoning ordinance was adopted by Salt Lake City on July 8, 2025, and is scheduled to take effect on October 8, 2025. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: _____9/25/25_________________ By: ____________________________ Senior City Attorney 2 Underlined text is new; text with strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. Modifications made as part of the Planning Commission recommendation are highlighted in yellow. All other text is existing with no proposed change. Adopts the Salt Lake City Off-Street Parking Standards Manual to read and appear as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto, and amends Subsections 21A.44.060.A.3 and 21A.44.060.15 and Section 21A.62.040 as follows: Amending Subsection 21A.44.060.3: 1 3. Parking in Front and Corner Side Yards: Location: 2 a. Parking in Required Yards: Parking stalls are prohibited in a required front yard or the 3 required corner side yard except when authorized by Section 21A.44.090. In the FR, R1, R2, 4 and SR-1A zoning districts, parking in driveways that comply with all applicable city 5 standards is allowed but shall not be used to satisfy off-street parking requirements except as 6 provided in this section. 7 8 b. Driveway Parking for single-family, two-family, townhome or rowhouse dwellings: 9 Parking in front and corner side yard areas, including on driveways, may be used to satisfy 10 off-street parking requirements when the driveway provides access to at least one parking 11 stall located behind the front line of the principal building. This provision does not override 12 any requirement in the underlying zoning district that all parking be located behind the 13 principal building. All parking must comply with the Off-Street Parking Standards Manual. 14 15 c. Parking stalls may be allowed in a provided front or corner side yard where it exceeds the 16 minimum yard requirement when: 17 1. In any zoning district found in Chapter 21A.28 Manufacturing Districts or Chapter 18 21A.32 Special Purpose Districts; or 19 2. Approved following the requirements in Section 21A.44.090; or 20 3. Authorized in the zoning district. 21 22 d. Parking for land uses that do not include a principal building shall be setback a minimum of 23 25 feet from the front or corner side lot line. The 25-foot setback shall be considered a 24 landscaped yard subject to the requirements of landscaped yards in Chapter 21A.48. 25 26 e. If this section conflicts with any standard or regulation of the underlying zoning district, the 27 provisions of the underlying zoning shall take precedence. 28 3 Amending Subsection 21A.44.060.15: 29 15. Tandem Parking: When more than one parking space is required for a residential dwelling 30 unit, the parking spaces may be designed as tandem parking spaces, provided that:Is allowed 31 for all land uses to fulfill required parking. 32 a) No more than two required spaces may be included in the tandem parking layout: and 33 Must be designed to be unobstructed. 34 b) Residential Dwelling Units: 35 1. No more than two required spaces may be included in the tandem layout; and 36 2. Each set of two tandem parking spaces layout shall be designated to a specific 37 residential unit. 38 Amending Subsection 21A.62.040 only for the purpose of adding a new definition of 39 “Unobstructed”, which shall be inserted in alphabetical order and shall read as follows: 40 Unobstructed: Refers to a parking space that has no permanent barriers such as walls, posts, 41 planters, or built-in storage that would reduce the space to smaller than the required stall 42 dimensions (9 feet by 20 feet for uncovered spaces; 10 feet by 20 feet for covered spaces). 43 Effective Date: This ordinance, if passed, shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake City Recorder. (Signatures follow on the next page) 4 ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________________. Mayor’s Action: _____Approved. _____Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 202__. Published: ______________. Ordinance Parking Dimensions & Off-Street Parking Standards Manual Update (legislative)_v1 5 EXHIBIT A: Salt Lake City Off-Street Parking Standards Manual This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:November 18, 2025 RE: Water Conservation and Land Use Element-General Plan Amendment to Plan Salt Lake PLNPCM2025-00481 ISSUE AT A GLANCE The Council will be briefed about an amendment to Plan Salt Lake proposed by the Administration that would integrate the City’s land use plans and the 2022 Water Conservation and Land Use Planning Plan (found on pages 7-9 of the Administration’s transmittal). This would bring the City’s general plan, Plan Salt Lake, into compliance with Utah State Code, which requires integrating a water element into the plan by December 31, 2025. The proposed amendment fulfills this requirement. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its August 27, 2025 meeting and held a public hearing at which one person spoke. The commenter suggested including more information about the Great Salt Lake, using gray water, the diversity of lower water consuming turf grasses, and reducing per capita water use. Public Utilities staff responded to the comments saying many of the topics mentioned are addressed in the Water Conservation Plan, on which the Council is tentatively scheduled to receive a briefing at its November 25, 2025 meeting. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation for approval to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed plan amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Item Schedule: Page | 3 Planning staff identified six key considerations related to the proposal, found on pages 2-5 of the Planning Commission staff report, and briefly summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the Planning Commission staff report. Consideration 1 – The Effect of Current and Future Development on Water Demand and Supply Water Supply and Demand Plan (2022) is included in the proposal with projected populations and water use based on three scenarios with varying degrees of water demand and conservation. Impacts from drought, climate change, wildfire, and other water supply risks are considered in this plan. The proposal recommends that the Water Supply and Demand Plan be updated every five years. The Public Utilities Department manages this plan and the Water Conservation Plan, both of which are being updated and are anticipated to go through the City adoption process in the coming months. Consideration 2 – Methods to Reduce Water Consumption Per Capita Avenues Plan definition of low density residential as up to five dwellings per acre, while the adjacent Capitol Hill Plan defines low density residential as up to 15 dwellings per acre. Planning noted updating the community plans and reducing the number of land use designations will help with future water planning. Consideration 3 – Opportunities to Reduce Water Consumption in City Operations Page | 4 Public Utilities reviewed water use and efficiency on City properties in this report. Water conservation at City facilities is primarily updating utilities and improving irrigation systems. The department plans and budgets for infrastructure upgrades. Additionally, some funds from the parks and open space bonds will be used to upgrade irrigation systems at several City parks. Information on park improvement projects is available here. Consideration 4 – Consideration of the Regional Water Conservation Goals Scenario 1 – Water savings primarily by improved efficiency. Does not represent significant changes in lifestyle or development patterns. Scenario 2 – Additional water conservation efforts through partial conversion to higher-efficiency household fixtures and lower water use landscaping methods. Scenario 3 – Maximum likely conservation, including full conversion to both higher-efficiency household fixtures and low water use landscaping methods. Plan Salt Lake set a goal of achieving the goals in Scenario 2 of the Water Supply and Demand Management Plan because the 2065 water conservation goals have already been met. Consideration 5 – Consideration of the Regional Water Conservation Plans Consideration 6 – Consideration of Policies Related to the Principles of Sustainable Landscaping Plan Salt Lake, which may result in future zoning changes. DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS property owners’ responsibility for park strip landscaping, including installation, maintenance, repair or replacement is in the current ordinance. Page | 5 Sustainability recommended using low water consuming turf grass where it’s allowed and in high-use public spaces, citing the potential cooling effects turf grass can have. They also recommended prioritizing water for the tree canopy. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS Attachment C (pages 12-13) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines factors for general plan updates that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether the proposal is consistent with citywide policies.Complies Whether the proposal is consistent with the goals, policies, or implementation actions of the general plan, including applicable element plans. Establishes a new chapter into Plan Salt Lake that addresses water conservation and land use planning. Whether significant change has occurred that warrants the creation of a new plan or an update to an adopted plan. Proposal is mandated by changes to Utah code requiring adoption of a water plan element. Whether the goals, policies, or implementation actions of the plan to be amended have been achieved, are no longer relevant to or capable of addressing the current issues or needs of the neighborhood or the city, or are no longer aligned with policies in citywide plans. Proposal is a new section to Plan Salt Lake and does not replace any outdated or irrelevant policies or goals. For petitions submitted by a property owner, the extent, effectiveness, and proportionality of the public benefit proposed by the petitioner to the increase in development potential if the proposal were to be adopted by the city council. Not applicable. The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Not applicable (proposal does not displace any people or housing). The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Does not displace any business but may result in future regulations that limit businesses consuming large amounts of water. The potential impacts to properties in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. Proposal is likely to result in additional regulations that limit water use, and it may impact some properties as a result. Page | 6 The potential impacts on the city to provide safe drinking water, storm water, and sewer to the property based on the additional development potential of future development. Proposal is intended to ensure the City can provide adequate drinking water, address storm water impacts, and treat wastewater to benefit the Great Salt Lake. The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. Ensuring safe and adequate drinking water is a benefit to public safety. The potential impacts to any other city service, infrastructure, or resource that may be impacted by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. Proposal does not increase development potential in the city. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • April 21, 2025 – Petition initiated by Mayor Mendenhall. • April 23, 2025 – Planning Commission briefed on project and Growing Water Smart initiative. • May 19, 2025 – Proposal and background information posted on the Planning Division Open House website. 45-day public notice and Utah general plan notices sent. • July 9, 2025 – 45-day input period ended. No public comments received. • August 13, 2025 – Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed. • August 27, 2025 – Planning Commission briefing and public hearing. The Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. • October 22, 2025 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council Briefing–November 18, 2025 PLNPCM2025-00481 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT // GROWING WATER SMART Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHAT IS GROWING WATER SMART? Update general plan by end of 2025 Intent: Plan for the impact of land use on water conservation Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning COORDINATION NATION. Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning SIX KEY COMPONENTS Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 1.Effect of current & future development on water demand and water infrastructure SCENARIO 2:ADDITIONAL WATER CONSERVATION SLC PU WATER SYSTEM AREA Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 2. Methods to reduce water consumption per capita. •Develop consistent future land use designations •Identify land uses with high water consumption •Gain efficiencies with large water users •Support decreased lot size standards •As water supply reduces: consider additional programs, policies and regulations that can reduce water use •Consider incentives for developments to lower water demand Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 3. Methods to reduce water in City Operations. •Improving & updating utilities and irrigation •Focus on park and golf course irrigation systems Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 4. Consideration of the regional water conservation goals. Water conservation state goals are set. •Salt Lake regional goal: reduce per capita use over time •SLC Public Utilities users reached state goal 40 years ahead of target •Identifying Scenario 2: increased levels of conservation Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 5. Consider city’s existing Water Conservation Plans Cites existing plans: •SLC Water Supply and Demand Management Plan •SLC Water Conservation Plans Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning KEY COMPONENTS 6. Consideration of policies related to sustainable landscaping. •SLC implemented most principles of sustainable landscaping •2024 SLC adopted most of the State’s landscaping recommendations •More zoning ordinance amendments could result… Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning WHAT IS GROWING WATER SMART? Update general plan by end of 2025 Intent: Plan for the impact of land use on water conservation SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/15/2025 Date Sent to Council: 10/22/2025 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Bell, Michaela E-mail Michaela.Bell@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 10/15/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 10/22/2025 Subject: PLNPCM2025-00481, Water Conservation and Land Use Element-General Plan amendment to Plan Salt Lake Additional Staff Contact: Laura Briefer laura.briefer@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Laura Briefer laura.briefer@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the general plan amendment. Background/Discussion Mayor Mendenhall initiated a plan amendment to Plan Salt Lake, to formally integrate the city’s land use plans with the City's 2022 Water Master Plan. This proposal updates the city’s general plan to comply with Utah State Code 10-9a-403, which mandates the inclusion of a water element in Plan Salt Lake by December 31, 2025. Planning and Public Utilities have worked in conjunction on this amendment to ensure compliance but reference to both land use and water plans. Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This project has been through a public engagement process. The Planning Commission was briefed once on the amendment and held a subsequent public hearing where the commission recommended to the Council to adopt the amendment to the general plan. The Council has final decision making authority. The item must be adopted by the end of the year 2025, as per state code. This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 202__ (Adopting the Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan) An ordinance adopting the Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan as part of Salt Lake City’s general plan. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a hearing on August 27, 2025 on a petition to adopt the Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan as part of Salt Lake City’s general plan as governed by Part 4 of Utah Code Chapter 10-9a; and WHEREAS, at its August 27, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) on said petition; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Adopting the Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan. That the Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan provided in Exhibit “A” attached hereto is adopted as part of Salt Lake City’s general plan as governed by Part 4 of Utah Code Chapter 10- 9a. The adoption of this plan serves to identify the goals and objectives identified within the plan, all of which are subject to future budget appropriations. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 202__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 202__. Published: ______________. Ordinance adopting Water Conservation plan APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney October 7, 2025 EXHIBIT “A” Water Conservation and Land Use Planning plan 42 SALT LAKE CITY | PLAN SALT LAKE 14/ WATER CONSERVATION AND LAND USE PLANNING GUIDING PRINCIPLE/ Grow in a manner that ensures water supply meets demand and provides sufficient redundancy to respond to water supply risks. 43SALT LAKE CITY | PLAN SALT LAKE 14/ WATER CONSERVATION AND LAND USE PLANNING POLICIES 1.Update water supply and demand plans every five years, or as appropriate, to maintain an understanding of the effect current development has on water demand and water infrastructure needs. 2.Utilize current Conservation Plan strategies to meet the Water Supply & Demand Plan goals. 3.Update community plans and zoning regulations to reduce the amount of water demand and per capita water use for future development. •Develop consistent future land use regulations across all community and small area plans to better understand the impact future development has on water demand and supply. •Identify land uses with high water consumption and develop water saving strategies. •Support decreased lot size and configuration standards. •As supply availability reduces, consider additional programs, policies, and regulations that can reduce water use. •Review allowed land uses in the zoning code and consider prohibiting land uses that consume large amounts of water. •Consider incentives for new and existing developments to utilize low-water demand landscaping and fixtures. •When needed, require new development to contribute water to increase the supply of water. 4.Support zoning regulations that promote sustainable landscaping practices to reduce outdoor water use and stormwater runoff, including: •Water wise landscaping that limits the use of high-water consuming turf and prohibits turf on steeper slopes, in small, landscaped areas, and in park strips. •Prioritize the maintenance, water, and planting of trees. •Reduce the amount of water used to irrigate park strips within city rights of way through elimination of overwatering and water waste. •Promote the maintenance and update of irrigation systems to reduce water waste. •Establish regulations that reduce storm water runoff, including appropriate grading, landscaping, and limits on impervious surfaces. 5.Support actions that improve the City’s water resiliency, including: •Strategies identified in the current Water Conservation Plan. •Ensure water is conserved and used efficiently at City facilities and operatus. •Investments into the City’s water, stormwater, and wastewater infrastructure. •Strategies promoting the health of Great Salt Lake, the City’s Wasatch Mountain watersheds, the Jordan River, and its tributaries. •Climate adaptation and mitigation. Salt Lake City provides water services not only to properties within the city boundaries, but to properties outside of the city as well. This creates a great responsibility to manage water resources responsibly for current and future generations. The City is also expected to grow significantly between now through at least 2040. Planning our growth is necessary to ensure that the city can provide clean, safe drinking water for residents and visitors while also ensuring water is available for businesses. To accomplish this, the city will continue efforts to reduce water demand and eliminate water waste, through changing development patterns, reducing overall water use, improving delivery systems, and appropriately pricing the cost of water based on the amount of water consumed. The following policies and initiatives will help the city ensure future residents, visitors, and businesses have adequate water in the future. GUIDING PRINCIPLE/ Grow in a manner that ensures water supply meets demand and provides sufficient redundancy to respond to water supply risks. 2060 METRICS: 1.CITYWIDE PER CAPITA WATER USE. 44 SALT LAKE CITY | PLAN SALT LAKE Salt Lake City Public Utilities provides water service to areas outside the city that include other cities on the eastern side of the valley, south of Salt Lake City. Public Utilities prepares a new 40-year Long Range Water Supply & Demand Plan approximately every five years, with the most recent plan prepared in 2022, primarily using 2018 data. The water demand projections are based on the water service area population below. In 2023 the service area used 154 gallons of water per capita per day. This amount takes the daily water use for all land uses (not just residential) and divides it by the service area population. The population projections for the service area are from the 2022 Water Supply & Demand Plan. Salt Lake City is expected to grow up to 272,468 people by 2060, with the city’s water service area population growing to 447,804. The anticipated demand, with the regional goal reduction of 25%, will be 122,300-acre feet of water. This exceeds the anticipated supply (during dry years). The current Water Supply & Demand Plan outlines three conservation planning scenarios to test the ability of the city’s water supply to reliably meet demand by the year 2060. •Scenario 1 - Water savings primarily by improved efficiency. Does not represent significant changes in lifestyle or development patterns. •Scenario 2 - Additional water conservation efforts through partial conversion to higher- efficiency household fixtures and lower water use landscaping methods. •Scenario 3 - Maximum likely conservation, including full conversion to both higher- efficiency household fixtures and low water use landscaping methods. For planning purposes, the City is incorporating Scenario 2, which includes increased water conservation and the development of the City’s remaining water rights by the year 2060. The City also utilizes the current Conservation Plan, which is informed by the Water Supply & Demand Plan, for strategies to meet this goal. This is subject to change, as long-range water supply and demand plans are regularly updated to incorporate new information. CONSIDERATION OF WATER CONSUMPTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATION Source: 2022 Salt Lake City Water Supply & Demand Plan Year 25% Reduction in Per Capita Use in Acre Feet (current state goal) Conservation Scenario 1 in Acre Feet Conservation Scenario 2 in Acre Feet Conservation Scenario 3 in Acre Feet Service Area Population 2025 105,100 103,500 91,000 74,500 378,838 2030 111,300 109,600 96,600 79,300 401,049 2040 117,400 115,700 102,300 84,600 424,671 2050 122,300 120,500 106,700 88,600 447.804 2060 127,200 125,200 111,200 92,600 470,704 ANNUAL WATER PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS [ THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ] 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Chronology April 21, 2025 Petition Initiated by Mayor Mendenhall April 23, 2025 Planning Commission briefed on project and Growing Water Smart initiative. May 19, 2025 The proposal and background information was posted on the Planning Division Open House Website.45-day Public Notice and Utah general plan notices sent. July 9, 2025 45-input period officially ended. No public comments or inquiry received. August 13, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing notice mailed (based on updated map) August 27, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing held—Positive Recommendation sent to City Council. 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering PLNPCM2025-00481 a general plan amendment to Plan Salt Lake, that would formally integrate the City’s land use plans with the City's 2022 Water Master Plan. This proposal updates the City’s General Plan to comply with Utah State Code 10-9a-403, which mandates the inclusion of a water element in Plan Salt Lake by December 31, 2025. This proposal is citywide. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in- person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Michaela Bell at 385-214-5311 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at michaela.bell@slc.gov The petition details can be accessed at https://www.slc.gov/planning/2025/05/20/openhouse2025-00481//. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. 4. ORIGINAL PETITION 5. PLANNING COMMISSION (PC) RECORDS • PC Agenda of April 23 & August 27, 2025 (Click to Access) • PC Minutes of April 23 & August 27, 2025 (Click to Access) • Planning Commission Staff Reports April 23 & August 27, 2025 (Click to Access Report) This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/06/2025 Date Sent to Council: 11/07/2025 From: Department * Public Utilities Employee Name: Briefer, Laura E-mail Laura.Briefer@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 11/06/2025 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 11/07/2025 Subject: 2025 Water Conservation Plan Update Additional Staff Contact: Stephanie Duer, stephanie.duer@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Laura Briefer, laura.briefer@slc.govStephanie Duer, stephanie.duer@slc.govKeith Larson, klarson@bowencollins.com Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Budget Impact: 671,000 (allocated for Conservation Program FY 2025-2026 Recommendation: It is recommended to adopt the 2025 Water Conservation Plan Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Will there need to be a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Over the past year as work was being conducted to develop this Plan, conservation staff met with a variety of stakeholders, including internal and external stakeholders, landscape professionals, experts in commercial and industrial water use, and academicians. Website and social media materials were developed and shared with City Council, community councils, and extensive contact lists provided by conservation and sustainability staff. Public meetings included a virtual town hall meeting held in September, followed by two open houses. An online survey was also posted on the conservation plan webpage (address below), with 147 respondents. In early July, a draft of the conservation plan was submitted for review to the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources/Division of Water Resources (DWRe), as per Utah State Code 73-10-32 (Water Conservation Plan Required). The DWRe rated the plan as excellent, stating, “the plan is well-written, easy to understand, and full of valuable information. The tables, graphs, and visuals are especially well done—clear and effective.” Stakeholder and public responses to the plan have been positive, with community members and stakeholders expressing support for conservation in general, and with an understanding of, and support for these new goals. Several stakeholders are developing 5-year Conservation Action Plans, including SLC Sustainability, SLC Parks, Salt Lake County, and others. Several businesses that participated in the on-line survey also have expressed interest in developing Conservation Action Plans and are currently working with conservation sta ff. The Public Utilities Advisory Committee reviewed the Plan and voted to recommend the Plan to the Mayor and Council for adoption during its meeting on September 18, 2025. This page has intentionally been left blank To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Date: November 4, 2025 From: Laura Briefer, Director, Public Utilities Department: Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities SUBJECT: 2025 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ADOPTION Document Type: Resolution Budget Impact: Impact to Water Fund/Water Conservation Budget FY 2025/26 $671,000 (allocated). Recommendation: It is recommended that City Council adopt the 2025 Water Conservation Plan PUBLIC PROCESS Over the past year as work was being conducted to develop this Plan, conservation staff met with a variety of stakeholders, including internal and external stakeholders, landscape professionals, experts in commercial and industrial water use, and academicians. Website and social media materials were developed and shared with City Council, community councils, and extensive contact lists provided by conservation and sustainability staff. Public meetings included a virtual town hall meeting held in September, followed by two open houses. An online survey was also posted on the conservation plan webpage (address below), with 147 respondents. In early July, a draft of the conservation plan was submitted for review to the State of Utah Department of Natural Resources/Division of Water Resources (DWRe), as per Utah State Code 73-10-32 (Water Conservation Plan Required). The DWRe rated the plan as excellent, stating, “the plan is well-written, easy to understand, and full of valuable information. The tables, graphs, and visuals are especially well done—clear and effective.” Stakeholder and public responses to the plan have been positive, with community members and stakeholders expressing support for conservation in general, and with an understanding of, and support for these new goals. Several stakeholders are developing 5-year Conservation Action Plans, including SLC Sustainability, SLC Parks, Salt Lake County, and others. Several businesses that participated in the on-line survey also have expressed interest in developing Conservation Action Plans and are currently working with conservation staff. The Public Utilities Advisory Committee reviewed the Plan and voted to recommend the Plan to the Mayor and Council for adoption during its meeting on September 18, 2025. BACKGROUND The Department of Public Utilities has completed an update of Salt Lake City’s Water Conservation Plan (Plan). Working with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., Public Utilities has prepared this Plan in accordance with Utah State Code 73-10-31 (Conservation Plan Act), and pursuant to industry best practices and other state and regional guidelines. Since the State of Utah first adopted the Conservation Plan Act, Public Utilities has developed conservation plans every five years for adoption by the City; this Plan represents the fifth update of the conservation plan first submitted in 1999. The Conservation Plan Act requires that all water providers with more than 5,000 water connections submit to the Utah State Department of Natural Resources/Division of Water Resources (DWRe) a conservation plan every five years. The Conservation Plan Act contains guidelines for plan development, as well as requirements of specific inclusions in conservation plans. These include: • Water supply • Historical water demand • Water conservation goals • Conservation program information • Adoption or approval by water providers governing body This Plan has been developed in accordance with the State’s Conservation Plan Act, as well as guidelines in the American Water Works Association Manual 52: Water Conservation Programs; US-EPA Water Conservation Plan Guidelines; Alliance for Water Efficiency Assessments of Conservation Programing; and the State of Utah’s Governor’s Office Recommended State Water Strategy. The Plan contains five chapters and appendices, summarized below. Chapter 1: Supply and Demand Chapter 1 summarizes the City’s overall water supply and demand for its service area through the year 2060, incorporating future growth projections and various water resource vulnerabilities and resiliency considerations, such as climate change. Analysis shows the following actions must be taken by the City: (1) additional water conservation is needed to ensure water supplies meet water demand needs in both short and long term time scales; (2) the City must continue to protect and manage its current and future water supplies; (3) the effects of climate change must continue to be studied, monitored, and planned for; and (4) expand an already robust conservation program by improving our understanding of water use patterns by specific customer groups, or classifications. Chapter 2: Historical Water Use Chapter 2 summarizes how water is used in Salt Lake City’s service area. Salt Lake City’s water service area includes Salt Lake City and portions of other communities within Salt Lake County, including Millcreek, Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, and other areas. An accounting of historical water use by year, by water user classification, and by season is provided. The data helps inform areas of programmatic prioritization to achieve conservation goals. The data also shows significant conservation progress to date has been made by our community since the base year 2000, with a reduction in total water demand of nearly 24 percent, a reduction in peak demand of 26 percent, and an average annual water reduction of over 21,000 acre- feet per year. Chapter 3: Conservation Goals Water use reduction goals (also referred to as water conservation goals) are evaluated regularly to ensure relevance to current and future water supplies, State Regional goals, and contractual goals related to our use of Central Utah Project water Use within the service area continues to trend below both state, regional, and contractual goals. Also presented in this chapter are new goals based on the analysis of supply, demand, and historical water use. New goal metrics include reducing gallons per capita per day (GPCD) to 146 gpcd by 2060; a reduction of 18.7 per cent. The goals include additional metrics regarding indoor and outdoor water use reductions, quantified in GPCD and in acre-feet, by subcategories within residential, commercial, and institutional water users. Conservation goals also include shorter term water conservation goals (5 and 10 years). Summary tables of these goals are shown below. Chapter 4: Conservation Programs, Practices, and Measures Chapter 4 outlines several programmatic elements of the City’s water conservation work. These include 1) Outreach; 2) Economic; 3) Utility; 4) Law and Policy; and 5) Research and Metrics. Community engagement, water rate structure, utility operations, ordinances, and good analytics are examples of practices within eac h of these programmatic elements. The City has incorporated many of these practices into its water conservation program. The Plan describes each programmatic element along with implementation requirements where available, such as funding, partnerships or collaborations, metrics and measures, as well as budgetary needs. Chapter 5: Public Outreach and Communication Chapter 5 of the Plan describes the public outreach for the conservation plan process, as well as goals and objectives for ongoing public engagement to incorporate public feedback regarding the Plan and achieve short- and long-term water conservation goals. Public comments and survey results indicate both an understanding and acceptance of the need to reduce water use, with most respondents indicating support for continued watershed and water source protection, environmental stewardship, and efforts to protect Great Salt Lake. Many also acknowledged that managing costs was a factor in their water use reduction behaviors. However, many survey respondents also indicated an unawareness of existing programs such as landscape transformation rebates, smart irrigation controller toilet rebates, and programs such as Water Check and WaterMAPS™. This knowledge gap reinforces the development of a short- and long-term strategic communications plan for conservation to enhance and build on community knowledge of conservation behaviors as well as program support. Appendices: The Plan appendices include helpful information for the public as well as the regulatory agencies reviewing the Plan. These include: • SLCDPU Service Area Map • State Division of Water Resources 2018 Water Conservation Plan Checklist • ANSI/AWWA G480 Water Conservation Program Operation and Management Standard Checklist • Water Conservation Budget, FY 2025/26 • Water Shortage Contingency Planning Ordinance and Response Summary • Public Utility Advisory Community Minutes/Water Conservation Plan Discussion and Recommendation • AWWA M36 Water Loss Audit report summary • Summary report on impacts of conservation on water rates • Salt Lake City Council Transmittal, Minutes, and Resolution • Links and References • Glossary of Terms, Abbreviations, and Acronyms WEBPAGE: A webpage, located at https://www.slc.gov/utilities/conservation/water-conservation-plan-2025/ hosts the following content: • Conservation Plan draft • Link to Townhall meeting • Plan presentation in pdf format • Link to online survey • Frequently Asked Questions This page has intentionally been left blank RESOLUTION NO. OF 2025 (2025 Water Conservation Plan) A resolution adopting the 2025 Water Conservation Plan, as required by Section 73-10-32 of the Utah Code. WHEREAS, Section 73-10-32 of the Utah Code requires that water conservancy districts and retail water providers adopt water conservation plans and update such plans no less frequently than every five years; and WHEREAS, consistent with Section 73-10-32(3) of the Utah Code, the City Council provided notice and held a public hearing to receive community input on the proposed 2025 Water Conservation Plan, and has considered such input in determining that adoption of the Plan is in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City recognizes that water conservation is essential to sustaining the City’s long-term water supply reliability, protecting the Great Salt Lake ecosystem, and ensuring that future generations benefit from responsible and equitable water management; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City supports the efforts to reduce water demand and improve water efficiency that have occurred and were outlined in previously adopted water conservation plans; and WHEREAS, the 2025 Water Conservation Plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 73-10-32 of the Utah Code; and WHEREAS, the 2025 Water Conservation Plan identifies updated strategies and measurable objectives for reducing per-capita water demand, increasing water-use efficiency, and expanding public outreach and education; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City is concerned about future efforts for further water conservation and has determined that it would be in the best interest of the community to adopt the 2025 Water Conservation Plan. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City that: 1. The City Council hereby adopts the 2025 Water Conservation Plan, attached hereto as Attachment A, as Salt Lake City’s plan for water conservation, demand management, and water-use efficiency. 2. The Department of Public Utilities is directed to implement the goals, objectives, and actions outlined in the 2025 Water Conservation Plan. 3. The City Council encourages continued collaboration with regional, state, and federal partners to secure funding, technical assistance, and community participation in achieving the Plan’s conservation objectives. 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and approval. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of , 2025. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL By: _ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: CITY RECORDER Resolution Adopting 2025 Water Conservation Plan 2 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: 11 /04/2025 By: /s/ Carly Castle Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Landscape Efficiencies Commercial Programs Education and Outreach Demonstration Gardens Environmental Stewardship Landscape Transformations Landscape Efficiencies Commercial Programs Education and Outreach Demonstration Gardens Environmental Stewardship Landscape Transformations DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page PS-1 PLAN SUMMARY DRAFT PLAN SUMMARY I NTRODUCTION Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (Department) has completed an update of its water conservation plan (Plan). Working with Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc., the Department has prepared this Plan in accordance with the State of Utah Conservation Plan Act 73-10-32, as well as under guidelines outlined in the American Water Works Association Manual M52: Water Conservation Programs and the State’s Regional Conservation Goals. At its simplest, water conservation is the effort of learning to use less water while maintaining quality-of-life standards. There are many reasons to conserve water, and for a community, it makes sense to plan that conservation effort. Planning helps quantify water supply and assess historical demand so that conservation goals may be established that help us live within and sustain limited water resources. Planning helps ensure that water conservation programs are adequate to achieve established goals. Planning helps communicate complex issues that affect short- and long-term conservation efforts, such as climate change and growth. And finally, conservation planning can convey the need to conserve, identify tools and resources available to the community for use in their conservation efforts, and build a shared water steward ethic that motivates us all to achieve the desired, and necessary, conservation goals. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page PS-2 PLAN SUMMARY SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page PS-3 PLAN SUMMARY SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS DRAFT CHAPTER ONE: SUPPLY AND DEMAND 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE AREA........................................... 1-2 1.2 DEMANDS ON THE WATER SYSTEM ........................................................... 1-2 1.3 SLCDPU WATER SUPPLY ....................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Existing Sources...................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.2 Future Sources ....................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.3 Total Annual Water Supply .................................................................... 1-6 1.4 WATER SYSTEM RISK ............................................................................ 1-7 1.5 FUTURE ANNUAL PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS COMPARED TO FUTURE DEMAND 1-9 1.6 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................... 1-10 CHAPTER TWO: HISTORICAL WATER USE 2.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 TOTAL WATER USE ............................................................................... 2-2 2.2 PER CAPITA USE .................................................................................. 2-3 2.3 SYSTEM LOSSES ................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 USE BY CLASSIFICATION AND SUB-CLASSIFICATION ........................................ 2-5 2.5 INDOOR AND OUTDOOR WATER USE ........................................................ 2-7 2.6 CONSERVATION PROGRESS TO DATE ....................................................... 2-12 CHAPTER THREE: CONSERVATION GOALS 3.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 CONSERVATION GOALS .......................................................................... 3-2 3.1.1 Governor’s 2001 Statewide Water Conservation Goal .......................... 3-2 3.1.2 Central Utah Project Conservation Agreement (Utah Lake System Conservation Goals) ........................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Recommended State Water Strategy, July 2017 ................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals, November 2019 And June 2025 ........................................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.5 Water Conservation And Great Salt Lake............................................... 3-4 3.1.6 Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan Conservation Goals ............................................................................................................... 3-4 3.1.7 Comparison Of Conservation Goals ....................................................... 3-4 3.2 DETAILS OF SLCDPU CONSERVATION GOALS .............................................. 3-5 3.2.1 Overall Conservation Goal ..................................................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Conservation Goal by Customer Classification .......................................3-5 3.2.3 Conservation Goals By Sub-Classification ...............................................3-9 3.2.4 Five- And Ten-Year Conservation Goals ...............................................3-13 3.2.5 Additional Conservation Potential For Great Salt Lake ........................3-14 CHAPTER FOUR: CONSERVATION PROGRAMS, PRACTICES, AND MEASURES 4.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CONSERVATION PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................ 4-2 4.1.1 Criteria ....................................................................................................4-2 4.1.2 Evaluation ...............................................................................................4-2 4.1.3 Resource allocation ................................................................................4-2 4.1.4 Terminology............................................................................................4-2 4.2 CONSERVATION BY CONNECTION ............................................................. 4-3 4.3 SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF CONSERVATION ............................................ 4-4 4.4 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS, PRACTICES, AND MEASURES ................... 4-5 4.4.1 Programs ................................................................................................4-5 4.4.2 Practices and Measures ..........................................................................4-6 4.4.3 Program Tables .......................................................................................4-6 4.5 OUTREACH......................................................................................... 4-8 4.5.1 Demonstration Gardens And SLCGARDENWISE.COM [0-3, 0-4, 0-5] .....4-9 4.5.2 Public Access, Cloud-based Portals [0-17] ............................................4-10 4.5.3 Conservation Learning Labs [0-14] .......................................................4-10 4.5.4 School Classroom Program [0-10] ........................................................4-11 4.5.5 Water Week and other Events [O-10, O-18] ........................................4-12 4.5.6 Conservation Action Plans [O-9, U-6] ...................................................4-12 4.6 ECONOMICS ..................................................................................... 4-17 4.6.1 Rebates, Micro-Grants, and Incentives [E-4, E-6, E-7, E-8] ...................4-18 4.6.2 CII Audits and Direct Installs [E-10] ......................................................4-18 4.7 UTILITY OPERATIONS .......................................................................... 4-21 4.7.1 Evaluate Data-Mining Opportunities of AMI Technologies [U-7, U-9] .4-22 4.7.2 Landscape Upgrades and Maintenance [U-2, U-10, U-11] ...................4-22 4.7.3 Leak Detection and M36 Audit Outcomes [U-3] ..................................4-23 4.7.4 City-Wide Water Efficiency Study [U-2, O-7] ........................................4-23 4.8 LAW AND POLICY ............................................................................... 4-27 4.8.1 Evaluate Ordinances and Policies [LP-4, LP-7, LP-8] .............................4-27 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.9 RESEARCH AND METRICS ...................................................................... 4-32 4.9.1 Conduct AWWA M36 Study [R-19] ...................................................... 4-33 4.9.2 Establish Metrics, Benchmarks, and Goals for Conservation Programing [R-1, O-6] ....................................................................................................... 4-33 4.9.3 5- and 10-Year Proposed Water Conservation budget ....................... 4-33 4.9.4 Landscape and Turf Conversion Impacts ............................................. 4-33 4.9.5 SLCDPU/USU Collaboration [R-1, R-5, O-6, O-16] ................................ 4-34 4.9.6 SLCDPU/CVWCD Landscape Transformation Analysis [R-] .................. 4-38 4.9.7 CII Water Depletion Evaluation and Conservation/Great Salt Lake Impacts [R-20, R-21] ..................................................................................... 4-39 4.9.8 CII Analytics [R-20] ............................................................................... 4-39 CHAPTER 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION PLAN 5.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................... 5-1 5.2 STAKEHOLDERS AND SPECIAL INTERESTS ..................................................... 5-2 5.3 MEDIA AND SOCIAL PLATFORMS .............................................................. 5-2 5.4 AVENUES OF COMMUNICATION ............................................................... 5-2 5.5 ONGOING COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH ............................................ 5-2 APPENDICES A. SLCDPU WATER SERVICE AREA MAP ..................................................... A-2 B. MWDSLS ULS REPORT 2024, TABLE 4: SALT LAKE CITY WATER USAGE AND CONSERVATION TRENDS ...................................................................... A-3 C. STATE DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 2025 WATER CONSERVATION PLAN CHECKLIST ........................................................................................ A-4 D. ANSI/AWWA G480-13 WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT STANDARD, FIRST EDITION. JULY 1, 2013 ............................ A-8 E. WATER CONSERVATION BUDGET 2025/26 ............................................ A-14 F. 17.16.092: WATER SHORTAGE MANAGEMENT POLICY ............................. A-16 G. SALT LAKE CITY CODE 21A-48-055 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPING STANDARDS ................................................................................................... A-17 H. PUBLIC UTILITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES/WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DISCUSSION .................................................................................... A-18 I. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SALT LAKE & SANDY BOARD MINUTES/WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ........... A-19 J. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING ..................... A-20 K. SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL, MINUTES, AND RESOLUTION ............ A-21 L. M36 WATER AUDIT SUMMARIES ......................................................... A-22 M. SLCDPU DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN SUMMARY ................................. A-23 N. IMPACTS OF WATER CONSERVATION ON RATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM, 2025 .. .................................................................................................... A-24 O. WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM MANAGER JOB DESCRIPTION .................. A-25 P. CONSERVATION ACTION PLANS ............................................................ A-26 Q. RESIDENTIAL WATER SALES TARGETS ..................................................... A-27 R. LINKS AND REFERENCES ...................................................................... A-29 S. GLOSSARY OF TERMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ACRONYMS ............................ A-30 LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page 1-1 Water System Service Area.......................................................................1-2 1-2 Demographic Factors Predictive Of Demand ............................................1-3 1-3 Projected SLCDPU Service Area Annual Production Requirements ..........1-4 1-4 Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Supply and Demand .................1-7 1-5 Little Cottonwood Creek-Annual Flow Volume at LCWTP ........................1-8 1-6 Projected SLCDPU Annual Production Requirements vs. Supply (Dry Year) With Supply Redundancy Buffers .............................................................1-9 2-1 Water Sales (gpd) .....................................................................................2-2 2-2 Salt Lake City Per Capita Water Use (gpd) ................................................2-3 2-3 Water Use Classification and Sub-Classification .......................................2-5 2-4 Volume of Use by Classification (AF/Year) ................................................2-6 2-5 Volume of Use by Sub-Classification (AF/Year) .........................................2-6 2-6 Seasonal Water Use, Single Residence (2022-2024) ................................2-7 2-7 Location of Use by Classification ..............................................................2-8 2-8 % Total Indoor Use by Classification .........................................................2-8 2-9 % Total Outdoor Use by Classification ......................................................2-8 2-10 Location of Use by Sub-Classification .......................................................2-9 2-11 % Total Indoor Use by Sub-Classification ..................................................2-9 2-12 % Total Outdoor Use by Sub-Classification ...............................................2-9 2-13 Volume of Use by Location of Use and Classification (AF/Year ..............2-10 2-14 Volume of Use by Location and Sub-Classification (AF/Year) .................2-10 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Page 2-15 Per Capita Water Use by Classification (gpd) ......................................... 2-11 2-16 Monthly Conservation, Average of All Connections............................... 2-12 2-17 Percent Reduction Since 2001 by Classification ..................................... 2-13 2-18 Percent Reduction Since 2001 by Classification ..................................... 2-14 2-19 Volumes of Conservation Since 2001 by Location of Use and Classification (AF/Year) ................................................................................................ 2-14 2-20 Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Per Capita Peak Day Water Use (GPD) ............................................................................................... 2-15 3-1 Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals ...................................... 3-3 3-2 SLCDPU Service Area Conservation Trend ................................................ 3-4 3-3 Additional Conservation by Month Averaged Across All Connections ..... 3-6 3-4 Estimated Additional Percentage to Achieve Long-Term Goal by Customer Classification ............................................................................................ 3-7 3-5 Volume of Conservation Needed to Achieve Long-Term Goal by Location of Use and Classification (AF/Year, Existing Customers) ........................... 3-8 3-6 Volume of Conservation Needed to Achieve Long-Term Goal by Location of Use and Sub-Classification (AF/Year, Existing Customers) ................... 3-9 3-7 Hotel and Motel Total Annual Use ......................................................... 3-10 3-8 Finance and Insurance Total Annual Use ............................................... 3-10 3-9 Hospitals Total Annual Use ..................................................................... 3-10 3-10 Real Estate and Rental Leasing Total Annual Use ................................... 3-10 3-11 CII Mean LIR ........................................................................................... 3-11 3-12 CII LIR by Service Connection ................................................................. 3-11 3-13 Conservation Alternatives ...................................................................... 3-14 4-1 Average Residential LIR Ranges .............................................................. 4-36 4-2 Residential Categorization by LIR and Water Volume ........................... 4-36 LIST OF TABLES No. Title Page 1-1 Projected Annual Yield of SLCDPU Surface Water Sources.......................1-5 1-2 SLCDPU Projected Dry Year Production Existing and Future Sources ......1-6 2-1 Water Sales in Acre-Feet ..........................................................................2-2 2-2 Estimated System Losses 2021-2024 ........................................................2-4 2-3 Total Connections .....................................................................................2-6 2-4 Reported Water Sales to Division of Water Rights (Acre-Feet) ................2-6 2-5 Updated Water Sales Data (Acre-Feet) .....................................................2-6 2-6 2024 Per Capita Water Use By Classification (gpd).................................2-11 3-1 Long-Term Conservation Goals Expressed as Per Capita Use (Gallons Sales Per Day) ....................................................................................................3-5 3-2 Percent Reduction In Per Capita Sales To Achieve Long-Term Goals ........3-5 3-3 Recommended Per-Household Interim Conservation Goals for Single Family Residential Customers ...................................................................3-8 3-4 Long-Term (2060) Conservation Goals by Sub-Classification .................3-12 3-5 Recommended Interim Conservation Goals ...........................................3-13 3-6 Interim Conservation Goals By Classification (af/year) ..........................3-13 3-7 Long-Term (2060) GSL Conservation Alternative Goals ..........................3-14 4-1 Additional Reduction In Per Connection Use Needed (Gpd/Connection) 4-3 4-2 Outreach .................................................................................................4-13 4-3 Economics ...............................................................................................4-19 4-4 Utility Operations ...................................................................................4-24 4-5 Law and Policy ........................................................................................4-29 4-6 Research and Metrics .............................................................................4-40 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-1 DRAFT SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE 1 Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, Bowen Collins & Associates, February 2019 CHAPTER ONE: SUPPLY AND DEMAND 1.0 I NTRODUCTION Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (Department or SLCDPU) retained Bowen Collins & Associates (BC&A) to complete a supply and demand master plan for its water system1. The purpose of that study was to compare the availability of water supplies to the existing and future demands on the system. The results of that study are meant to guide the Department’s decisions regarding supply management and development, as well as inform the Department’s decisions regarding demand management, including the establishment of conservation targets. Key elements of that study are summarized here to ensure consistency within the Department’s multiple planning processes. The details contained in this chapter are derived nearly entirely from the Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, 2019 (Supply and Demand Plan), including service area, demand projections, current and future water supplies, water supply risks, and recommended actions. As summarized in the highlights to the left, future demand (without additional conservation) will outpace future supply by approximately 14 percent, owing in part to anticipated growth. A number of potential risks have been identified, though impacts from climate change bring the widest range of variables and may alter both water supply and demand projections. A number of strategies have been identified to meet this potential water supply shortfall. One strategy already in place is to plan for reserve water supplies through the use of operational and planning practices. Continued research related to climate change will improve our understanding of supply and demand impacts, lessening uncertainty. Lastly, and the subject of this plan, is to expand an already robust conservation program by improving our understanding of water use behaviors and patterns to further enhance water conservation efforts and meet newly established demand reduction goals. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-2 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE 1.1 S ALT L AKE C ITY P UBLIC U TILITIES S ERVICE A REA Salt Lake City (City) currently provides all retail water service within Salt Lake City corporate boundaries. It also provides retail service to portions of other communities on the east side of the Salt Lake Valley. This includes portions of South Salt Lake, Mill Creek, Holladay, Murray, Cottonwood Heights, and unincorporated Salt Lake County. The service area is shown in Figure 1-1 with a larger, more detailed map included in the appendix to this plan. The Utility service area is shown in pink. It should be noted that there are two private water providers completely surrounded by the City’s service area. The University of Utah (shown in red) and Holliday Water Company (shown in blue) have their own sources and distribute water within their respective service areas. They also purchase water from the Utility, with that purchased water included within this analysis. 1.2 D EMANDS ON THE W ATER S YSTEM When discussing water demand, system water volume is measured either as production or water sales. Water supply needs are typically discussed in terms of production, where water demand is assessed by analyzing water sales. Water Sales. Water sales (sometimes referred to as “water use”) refers to the amount of water metered at the point of connection to customers. This total amount is reported to the State of Utah Division of Water Rights and Central Utah Project (CUP) annually for tracking water use and conservation progress. Because of the more detailed information available regarding individual water customers, water sales are used for calculating use and reduction values in Chapters 2 and 3. Production. Evaluation of supply is based on demands on the water system expressed in terms of production requirement. The production requirement is the amount of water that must be produced at wells and treatment plants, and be purchased from wholesale providers, in order to meet the entire water supply and water storage needs of the system and our customers. Water sales do not represent the full volume of water within the system. Inherent in any system is water loss, which is the difference between produced water and authorized consumption. This water loss may be real losses (such as leakage, unmetered authorized uses such as firefighting water, and storage tank overflows) and apparent losses (such as meter inaccuracies at the point of delivery, data errors, or theft of water). FIGURE 1-1 WATER SYSTEM SERVICE AREA SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-3 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE As future production requirements are evaluated, there are limitations in making these projections. We cannot predict actual demand, but we can project future use by evaluating select demographic factors. This information then informs projections of total water use. Water production requirements in the service area were estimated by first developing projections for the four characteristics predictive of demand as shown in Figure 1-2: 4.1 Residential Population to predict residential indoor use; 5.1 Employment Population to predict commercial and institutional indoor use; 6.1 Industrial Area to predict industrial uses; and 7.1 Irrigated Area to predict outdoor use for all water user classifications (residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial). The water production for each characteristic was projected with respect to anticipated growth and development. The predictions of system growth are based on planning data (e.g. SLC zoning maps), regional planning data (e.g. U.S. 2010 census and Wasatch Front Regional Council growth projections), and coordination with City officials. For additional detail, please refer to the Supply and Demand Master Plan. With growth in each component projected, it is then possible to model future indoor and outdoor water use: Indoor Use. For most indoor use, it was determined that water demand could be reasonably estimated using residential population (to project residential water use) and employment projections (to project commercial and institutional water use). The only type of indoor use that did not appear to be well represented by these two parameters is industrial use. For industrial demands, water use was projected based on total developed industrial area. Outdoor Use. Outdoor use was determined by evaluating estimated total irrigatable area multiplied by historical outdoor water use. This was initially estimated to be 3.5 AF/acre (or 42 inches of water per season) in 2001,2 but 2 Per 2001 irrigation water use data. See Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, p2-9 has gradually decreased to an estimated current use of 2.66 acre-feet (32 inches of water per season).3 The final step of projecting demands is to combine the projected indoor and outdoor water demand. 3 Per recent water use data (2022-24). See Chapter 2. Please note that these values are for water production. Actual application rate at the point of delivery (including system losses) will be 10 to 12 percent less. FIGURE 1-2 DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS PREDICTIVE OF DEMAND SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-4 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE The outcome of this analysis is displayed in Figure 1-3, which shows the historical and projected water production requirements in terms of annual production. This projected water production is based on expected demands if no additional conservation is achieved beyond what has been accomplished to date. Without increased levels of conservation, required production is expected to increase from 87,000 acre-feet today to about 127,200 acre-feet by the year 2060, or roughly a 34% increase in production to meet population growth over the next 40 years. 1.3 SLC DPU W ATER S UPPL Y The City has a number of existing water sources and is also planning future supplies. Like nearly all water sources, the water produced is tied to precipitation. As intuition would suggest, in years with above average snow and rainfall, sources almost always produce more, and sometimes a lot more. Conversely, in dry years, sources usually produce less water. Consecutive dry years can exacerbate pressures on supplies and result in reduction in source water. This reduction can then be compounded by increased demands due to hotter and drier periods. Water demand management during times of drought is addressed in the Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan, which can be found on line at www.slc.gov/utilities/conservation. Available water associated with both existing and future sources for both average and dry water years is summarized in the following sections. 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 An n u a l P r o d u c t i o n ( a c r e -fe e t ) Historical Production Projected Production Without Additional Conservation FIGURE 1-3 PROJECTED SLCDPU SERVICE AREA ANNUAL PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-5 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE 1.3.1 EXISTING SOURCES The existing water supply comes from a number of different sources, and for planning purposes, have been grouped into three categories: Surface Water Sources. Salt Lake City and the Department hold water rights for a number of surface water sources. This includes surface water treated at the following utility-owned and operated treatment plants: Big Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant (BCWTP), Parleys Water Treatment Plant (Parleys WTP), and City Creek Water Treatment Plant (CCWTP). This category also includes portions of surface water in Little Cottonwood Creek. This water is treated at Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant (LCWTP), a plant owned and operated by Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (MWDSLS). Expected yields for each source based on historic flow records, available storage, and available treatment capacity at each of the plants are summarized in Table 1-1. TABLE 1-1 PROJECTED ANNUAL YIELD OF SLCDPU SURFACE WATER SOURCES Source Average Year Yield (acre-feet) Dry Year Yield (acre-feet) Comments BCWTP 22,000 18,900 Dry Year in 2015 Parleys WTP 11,200 3,100 Dry year based on firm yield of Little Dell Reservoir CCWTP 5,950 4,500 Dry Year in 2015 LCC (LCWTP) 20,350 14,320 Dry year in 2015 Total 59,500 40,820 Groundwater Sources. Salt Lake City and the Department hold water rights for a number of groundwater sources. For evaluation purposes, groundwater sources have been broken into two categories: Base Wells and Springs. The City has several springs and artesian wells that require little or no pumping. Water from these sources is used year-round. The estimated average production of these sources is 7,500 acre-feet per year. This is for both average and dry water years. Peaking Wells. All remaining ground water sources are generally used only during the summer months to meet peak demands. Annual water production from these wells will vary significantly based on needs, but has an estimated maximum of 10,400 acre-feet. Preferred Storage Rights through Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (MWDSLS). This category of supply consists of water received through membership in MWDSLS. This includes water stored in Deer Creek and Jordanelle Reservoirs and comes in two components as follows: MWDSLS Provo River Project (PRP) Storage. The average year production of this source is 53,760 acre-feet. This is based on the full MWDSLS allotment of 61,700 acre-feet less 7,940 acre-feet of preferred storage reserved for Sandy City. Dry year production from this source has been estimated at 18,900 acre-feet. This is based on a 43.5% percent allotment from Deer Creek Reservoir as was experienced during the recent drought (2013). MWDSLS Central Utah Project (CUP) Storage. The available supply from this source is assumed to be 20,000 acre-feet in both average and dry years, which is the contractually defined amount. Utah Lake System Water. The City petitioned Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD) for Central Utah Project (CUP) water through the planned Utah Lake System (ULS). This system was completed this year and is expected to supply 3,100 acre-feet going forward. 1.3.2 FUTURE SOURCES Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR). In conjunction with Sandy City and MWDSLS, the City is currently investigating the utilization of aquifer storage and recovery. This option will utilize high spring runoff from surface water sources to be injected or infiltrated into the aquifer and documented with the State Engineer. Then, in dry years, this water would be available for extraction through wells. It is estimated that potential dry year yield of this source will be 5,900 acre-feet. This amount could be greater depending on sustained conservation efforts, as reduction in demand would reduce extraction volume. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-6 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE New Well Development. Development of additional groundwater has been planned to meet future growth and estimates development of current rights could yield up to 12,000 acre-feet additional groundwater. Wastewater Reuse. Opportunities for wastewater reuse have been studied. Initial plans for wastewater reuse would produce approximately 4,200 acre -feet annually. Additional Surface Water Development. Another potential supply is the development of a treatment plant to treat water from Millcreek Canyon or from other surface water sources. Based on historic flow records for Millcreek, potential yield from this source is estimated to be 3,970 acre-feet in an average year and 3,300 acre-feet in a dry year. Secondary Water. Recently, an analysis of potential opportunities for using secondary water on City properties within its service area4 was completed. While there are some limited opportunities for the use of secondary water, the analysis concluded that most of these opportunities were not viable at this time. The analysis also concluded that nearly all of the secondary water rights woul d be needed for other purposes in a dry year and correspondingly would not add appreciably to the reliable annual water supply of the City. A final consideration is that within the City watershed, secondary water is generally derived from the same sources as is culinary water, that is, from snow melt from the Wasatch Mountains. With this in mind, secondary water does not offer a new or discrete supply and so does not fully alleviate culinary demand burdens. 1.3.3 TOTAL ANNUAL WATER SUPPLY The total projected production of each category of supply described above is summarized in Table 1-2. For dry year conditions, annual supply is expected to increase from its existing yield of 97,620 acre-feet to a total future yield of 126,120 acre-feet. 4 Salt Lake City Secondary Water Irrigation Master Plan, Bowen Collins & Associates, February 2019. TABLE 1-2 SLCDPU PROJECTED DRY YEAR PRODUCTION EXISTING AND FUTURE SOURCES Supply Category Projected Average Year Production (acre-feet)1 Projected Dry Year Production (acre-feet) Existing Surface Water Sources 59,500 40,820 Existing Groundwater Sources 7,500 17,900 Existing Storage Sources 73,760 38,900 New Wells 0 12,000 Additional Surface Water (MCWTP) 3,970 3,300 ULS 3,100 3,100 ASR2 -5,900 5,900 Additional SLC Surface Water 4,200 4,200 Total3 146,130 126,120 1. New Wells are projected at no production in the average year not because they are not available, but because they are not needed during average (or wet) years. 2. ASR is shown to have a negative production in the average year to represent the use of excess surface water source in the spring for injection into the aquifer. Thus, it will be a new demand, represented here as a “negative” source. This activity will occur in average years to make water available for extraction in dry years. 3. Secondary water supply is not included in this table as it is already being used for other purposes or was determined to not be a viable source of water at this time. Refer to Salt Lake City Secondary Water Irrigation Master Plan. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-7 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE 1.4 W ATER S YSTEM R ISK When planning for water supply, it is important to prepare for uncertainty by identifying and addressing risk and vulnerability to water supplies and within the system infrastructure. Regardless, if these uncertainties take the form of extreme weather conditions, system interruptions or failures, or other events, careful analysis and planning can mitigate or ameliorate negative outcomes. Four important questions were considered when analyzing long-term water supply projections in relation to mitigating risk: A. Is the historical data an appropriate indication of future source performance in the critical planning scenario (i.e. the “dry year”)? The last 30 years have been drier than the long- term measured period of record.5 However, this 30-year dry period is typical of dry periods in the paleo record.6 Therefore, the use of historical data (over the past 30 years) to describe future source performance appears to be an appropriate starting point. B. Are there factors (such as climate change) that would cause water supplies to perform differently than in the past? There are several conceivable events that might affect future supplies in such a way that would cause future performance to be different than the historical record might suggest. These events can range from temporary supply interruptions (with causes such as sudden equipment failure, earthquake, or wildfire) to long term changes to supply performance (with causes such as climate change). 5 See Figures 4-2 and 4-3 from the Water Supply and Demand Master Plan. 6 See Figures 4-4 and 4-5 from the Water Supply and Demand Master Plan. Climate change analysis is incorporated into long-term water resource planning. Though immediate changes in climate or weather variability are addressed in the Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan, increasing frequency or duration of these variables will affect day -to-day water demand. As such, it is important to consider the impacts of climate change not only to supply, but also to demand as conceptually shown in Figure 1-4.7 The EPA Climate Change Adaptation Resource Center identifies water demand modification as one of many viable strategies for increasing water supply resilience and security in the face of climate change. 7 Climate Resilience Approaches in Salt Lake City. May 16, 2018. Laura Briefer. American Water Resources, Utah Section. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CURRENT AVERAGE MAKEUP WATER CURRENT AVERAGE SUPPLY FUTURE AVERAGE DEMAND? FUTURE AVERAGE SUPPLY? CURRENT AVERAGE DEMAND MET FIGURE 1-4 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SUPPLY AND DEMAND SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-8 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE C. What level of system redundancy is reasonable to address possible supply interruptions, such as a source failure or outage? As part of its Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, several supply redundancy criteria have been adopted to address potential supply interruptions. This includes different levels of redundancy for single source loss and catastrophic loss of water supplies. Additional details regarding these redundancy criteria are contained in the Water Supply and Demand Master Plan. (See Figure 1-5). D.How can demand management and conservation proactively reduce potential impacts to supply or system as a result of risk? Demand management can be an effective tool in ameliorating future potential negative impacts related to risk and vulnerability of supply. This is the primary topic of this plan and is addressed in Chapter 4. Relative to risk, it should be noted that all practical and necessary steps are undertaken to minimize these types of risks. This includes regularly scheduled maintenance, regular inspections of key equipment, advanced asset management tracking, and rehabilitation and replacement planning. Additional discussion pertaining to risk, vulnerability, and potential mitigation can be found in the Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan. 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 19 1 2 19 1 4 19 1 6 19 1 8 19 2 0 19 2 2 19 2 4 19 2 6 19 2 8 19 3 0 19 3 2 19 3 4 19 3 6 19 3 8 19 4 0 19 4 2 19 4 4 19 4 6 19 4 8 19 5 0 19 5 2 19 5 4 19 5 6 19 5 8 19 6 0 19 6 2 19 6 4 19 6 6 19 6 8 19 7 0 19 7 2 19 7 4 19 7 6 19 7 8 19 8 0 19 8 2 19 8 4 19 8 6 19 8 8 19 9 0 19 9 2 19 9 4 19 9 6 19 9 8 20 0 0 20 0 2 20 0 4 20 0 6 20 0 8 20 1 0 20 1 2 20 1 4 20 1 6 Average Flow Volume FIGURE 1-5 LITTLE COTTONWOOD CREEK-ANNUAL FLOW VOLUME AT LCWTP SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-9 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE 1.5 F UTURE A NNUAL P RODUCTION R EQUIREMENTS C OMPARED TO F UTURE D EMAND Figure 1-6 compares the total dry year water supply (including new supplies that have not yet been developed) with SLCDPU’s recommended supply planning demand scenario (including applicable provisions for risk). The scenario assumes that: 1. Conservation will, minimally, continue to maintain pace with recent levels and the current regional Conservation goal (15% reduction in per capita water usage by 2040). 2. The new conservation goals (see Chapter 3), which meet or exceed the State’s newly adopted regional conservation goals; and 3. Required production will include provisions to meet levels of supply risk as described in the previous section. 4. Reuse water is no longer a projected water source, as the Utility is making that water available to Great Salt Lake. As can be seen in Figure 1-6, as long as the conservation goals are met by the end of the planning window, current and anticipated future supplies are sufficient for long term projected system demands. However, the figure also shows that there will be very little excess capacity when supply risk and recommended redundancy is considered. This means that failing to meet the conservation goals could result in risk of inadequate water supply for projected FIGURE 1-6 PROJECTED SLCDPU ANNUAL PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS VS. SUPPLY (DRY YEAR) WITH SUPPLY REDUNDANCY BUFFERS SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 1-10 SUPPLY AND DEMAND: CHAPTER ONE demands. Reviewing and reevaluating these goals to lessen risk, decrease pressure on reserved water, improve supply redundancies, and optimize changes in technology and behavior related to demand management is recommended. 1.6 R ECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis summarized above, the following actions identified in the Water Supply and Demand Master Plan are recommended for inclusion in the SLC Water Conservation Plan: Increase Efforts in Water Conservation Programming to Achieve Short - and Long-term Goals. Water supply challenges will occur if conservation programming efforts and outcomes to achieve the recommended planning scenario goals defined in this report (see Chapter 3) are not reached . Details of the conservation program proposed to meet these goals are discussed in Chapter 4 of this plan. Protect and Manage Water Supply. The City will require all identified water supplies to accommodate future growth with adequate buffer to address reasonable risk to the water supply. This includes: • Developing an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) program (Estimated completion time =2025) • Developing new groundwater wells (gradually added between 2026 and 2036) • Plan to dedicate water previously planned for reuse to the Great Salt Lake. • The City should continue to monitor supplies and demands into the future and refine project timelines accordingly. Monitor Effects of Climate Change. Climate change impacts analysis should continue to remain a component of long-term water resource planning. Though immediate changes in climate or weather variability can be addressed in the Salt Lake City Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (2019), increasing frequency or duration of these variables will affect day -to-day water demand. As such, it is important to consider the impacts of climate change not only on supply but also demand. The US Environmental Protection Agency Climate 8 Resilient Strategies Guide for Water Utilities. US-EPA 2019 Change Adaptation Resource Center identifies water demand modification as one of many viable strategies for increasing water supply resilience and security in the face of climate change. Continued monitoring of the water supply and demand is recommended, modifying this plan as necessary to address changing circumstances associated with climate change.8 Review and Reevaluate Conservation Goals. Regular review of conservation goals and outcomes will help to reduce risk, increase resiliency, and improve the ability to respond to changes in demand and supply, particularly in light of impacts to supply of increased reduction in use for Great Salt Lake. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-1 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO DRAFT CHAPTER TWO: HISTORICAL WATER USE 2.0 I NTRODUCTION Measuring water demand in terms of water production is the common practice for supply planning; however, water sales can be a more useful measurement when considering water use by connection and customer. This measurement is useful because water delivery meters are tied to specific end users. As discussed in Chapter 1, water use data reported to the State of Utah Division of Water Rights is based on water sales. The service area has been fully metered at the customer connection for nearly one hundred years. Meters are read every month and bills are issued to every water customer, including city and other government entities. This depth of metering history and data informs planning processes, and in particular, shapes the nature of water demand management and conservation planning. To analyze historical water use, we consider not only total water sales, but also general characteristics of those using the water, as well as the nature of water use patterns. Identifying types of customers and aggregating them into groups– classifications–helps us more effectively analyze water use, recognize patterns, chart trends, and anticipate future water needs based on the characteristics of our customers (user classifications) and the numbers of customers within each classification. This analysis informs planning across all aspects of the Department and is particularly useful in conservation planning. This chapter documents historical water use based on total water sales, water sales in several classifications and subclassifications, water sales as expressed as gallons per capita day (gpcd) and impacts of historical water conservation. Additionally, water loss–the difference between water produced and water sold–is also discussed, as well as an overview of water conservation program impacts. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-2 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO 2.1 T OTAL W ATER U SE Water sales data has been collected, analyzed, and reported for many years. A summary of the reported sales since 2000 is shown in Table 2-1 and plotted in Figure 2-1. TABLE 2-1 WATER SALES IN ACRE-FEET Year Total Sales Reported to DWRi 2000 89,138 2001 91,712 2002 85,306 2003 80,641 2004 78,900 2005 71,297 2006 76,645 2007 87,190 2008 75,843 2009 74,697 2010 75,755 2011 70,130 2012 83,611 2013 80,196 2014 75,300 2015 72,722 2016 75,261 2017 78,310 2018 77,867 2019 69,299 2020 78,713 2021 68,767 2022 69,523 2023 69,134 2024 77,901 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Us e P e r C a p i t a ( g p d ) DWRi Records FIGURE 2-1 WATER SALES (GPD) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-3 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO 2.2 P ER C APITA U SE The primary way in which the State has chosen to measure water use and conservation progress is based on per capita water sales. Per capita water sales are calculated by dividing total water sales by a census-based population, a simplistic statistical analysis representing complex use characteristics. Per capita water sales for the service area over the past 18 years is shown in Figure 2-2. The per capita measuring approach is commonly used by the State of Utah as it provides a uniform methodology that can be applied to the many water systems it regulates. Unfortunately, there are also a number of weaknesses associated with measuring water and conservation progress based on per capita water sales. System Losses. Basing calculations on water sales rather than water production does not capture the effect of system losses on water consumption. Consequently, elimination of leaks and other system losses has no effect on per capita water sales even though these kinds of savings are an important part of overall conservation efforts. This may also result in undervaluing water loss programing as an effective conservation tool, as this method of calculation does not account for water loss and therefore reducing water loss do es not alter gallons per capita calculations. Effects of Land Use. Per capita water sales can be misleading because it does not adequately communicate the effects of density and other land use aspects on water use. For example, if a community significantly increases its population density, the amount of outdoor water use associated with each person may go down. This may result in lower per capita water sales even if the actual efficiency of water use does not improve. While this type of decrease in per capita water sales may reduce peak demand, it may not reflect overall changes in water use as a result of densification. Demand Forecasting. Frequently used to forecast future water demand, the use of per capita consumption assumes that water use increases in a predictable manner as population grows. This, however, ignores a number of national trends important to determining use levels, including but not limited to drought, recession, changes in demographics, changes in household or lot size, changes in commercial and industrial profiles, and improvements in technology. 9Water Conservation Programs M52, page 41 Additionally, assuming use increases with population ignores the role of conservation planning, education, and improvements in efficiencies related to use.9 Misinterpretation. Per capita consumption may also be misinterpreted to mean “volume of water used per person,” when in fact, it includes much more than direct use by individuals. As noted above, it also includes water use from all other classifications (commercial, institutional, and industrial) averaged across the population. Comparing gallons per capita of communities with differing 100 150 200 250 300 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Us e P e r C a p i t a ( g p d ) DWRi Records FIGURE 2-2 SALT LAKE CITY PER CAPITA WATER USE (GPD) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-4 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO demographics or commercial and industrial bases can lead to misleading comparisons or characterizations of how water is actually being used. This may also affect an individual’s response to calls to conserve as they may not relate to the volume of water described in the gallons -per-capita statistic. When looking at residential use only, use per person in 2024 was only about 81 gpd (indoor and outdoor use). Adjustment for Equivalent Employment Population. While the weaknesses above are universal to all water providers, there are also some other weakness to using per capita water sales that are unique to the situations of individual water providers. One of these weaknesses is the impact of daytime employment population on water demand. Salt Lake City has a larger daytime worker population compared to other cities in Utah. Not only is the total magnitude large, but the ratio of workers to permanent population is also much larger than most other communities, even when compared to similarly sized communities across the country. This was demonstrated as an outcome of the 2000 US Census. The consequence of this larger-than-average worker population is that, in calculating per capita water sales, the standard calculation does not account for a daytime population surge of nearly 50 percent of the residential population. This in turn could result in under-projecting daytime water needs and distribution capacity. Additionally, this daytime surge may result in inflated daily per capita calculations. To account for this issue, a revised methodology has been developed which calculates per capita water sales based on a revised population number .10 This revised population number includes both permanent residents and an equivalent residential population representing the higher than average worker population. This revised population has been used to generate the results in Figure 2-10. Because of these weaknesses, tracking water use and conservation on a per capita basis does not provide as complete a view of actual water use patterns as is necessary to properly analyze and evaluate water use patterns and trends for planning purposes. However, since this is the method traditionally used by the State to track water use, it will continue to be referenced here. Additional metrics will also be added where useful to help define and clarify water use and conservation within the service area. 10 Documentation of MWDSLS Conservation Performance – ULS Supply Petition, Bowen Collins & Associates, April 28, 2006 2.3 S YSTEM L OSSES As discussed in Chapter 1, water use (as measured through sales at individual delivery points), does not encompass all of the water held or consumed in the water system. Water loss is defined as the difference between water produced and authorized consumption (such as metered water sales or fire protection). The resulting “unaccounted for” water may be apparent loss, such as theft or data analysis errors, or real losses, which consist of water lost through all types of leaks and breaks within the water infrastructure system. Understanding the nature of system loss is critical to developing effective management and mitigation strategies, with the goal of reducing system-wide losses. A comparison of water sales to metered production can identify the magnitude of water losses in the system. This is summarized in Table 2-2. TABLE 2-2 ESTIMATED SYSTEM LOSSES 2021-2024 YEAR Sales (Acre-feet) Production (Acre-feet) System Losses (Acre-feet) System Losses (%) 2021 68,767 85,473 16,706 19.54% 2022 69,523 81,634 12,111 14.84% 2023 69,134 83,813 14,679 17.51% 2024 77,901 89,939 12,038 13.38% To verify and address system losses, a water loss and control audit in accordance with AWWA M36 recommendations has been conducted from 2000 to 2024.11 More details of these programs can be found in Chapter Four: Water Conservation Programs. 11American Water Works Association (AWWA). 2017. M52 Water Conservation Programs: A Planning Manual, Second Edition. Denver, Colorado. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-5 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO 2.4 U SE BY C LASSIFICATION AND S UB -C LASSIFICATION To provide additional background and context for developing, evaluating, and ultimately implementing conservation measures, it is useful to understand the details of how water is used within the service area. The figures and tables contained in this section have been assembled to provide additional detail regarding the breakdown of use by customer classification. These same classifications and sub-classifications will be used in the discussion of conservation programing in Chapter 4. Customers have been organized into a number of classifications based on shared characteristics such as use patterns and costs of service. This includes both broad classifications (residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional) and more narrowly defined sub-classifications (single-family residence, triplex, hospital, restaurant, etc.). The classifications and sub-classifications used for this analysis are summarized in the corresponding graphic (Figure 2-3). Total numbers of existing connections by classification as reported to the DWRi are summarized in Table 2-3. Reported use by classification is summarized in Table 2-4 and Table 2-5. Table 2-4 includes a long-term record of use by Residential Single Residence Duplex Triplex Fourplex Commercial Business Hospital Hotel or Motel Restaurant Apartment Miscellaneous Institutional School Church Parks Government Industrial Industrial customers of all types FIGURE 2-3 WATER USE CLASSIFICATION AND SUB-CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-6 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO classification as reported to the DWRi. Table 2-5 includes records from 2021- 2024 based on improved customer classification data as discussed previously . Total use by classification and sub-classification are shown graphically in Figures 2-4 and 2-5, respectively. TABLE 2-3 TOTAL CONNECTIONS YEAR Residential Commercial Industrial Institutional Total 2024 73,256 9,322 272 1,332 84,182 TABLE 2-4 REPORTED WATER SALES TO DIVISION OF WATER RIGHTS (ACRE-FEET) YEAR RESIDENTIAL2 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL1 TOTAL 2010 43,283 17,584 3,397 11,491 75,755 2011 40,703 16,534 2,688 10,205 70,130 2012 48,611 18,813 3,331 12,856 83,611 2013 44,454 19,078 3,459 13,205 80,196 2014 42,283 18,587 3,699 10,731 75,300 2015 40,702 17,723 3,474 10,823 72,722 2016 42,695 17,858 3,527 11,181 75,261 2017 43,534 20,313 3,662 10,801 78,310 2018 44,272 18,792 3,627 11,176 77,867 2019 38,642 17,145 3,745 9,767 78,867 2020 46,294 16,881 3,693 11,845 69,299 2021 39,543 16,228 3,690 9,306 78,713 2022 36,817 15,996 3,870 12,840 68,767 2023 36,817 17,616 4,118 10,583 69,523 2024 39,914 18,921 5,577 13,490 69,134 1.In 2005 and 2006, a portion of SLC water use was reported under a customer class labeled as “Other”. This use has been included under the institutional classification in Table 2-4. 2. For purposes of this table and consistency with State reporting documents, apartments are included in the residential classification. However, apartments will be considered commercial for all subsequent portions of this report. TABLE 2-5 UPDATED WATER SALES DATA (ACRE-FEET) YEAR Residential Commercial1 Institutional Industrial Total 2022 29,522 29,658 7,713 4,076 70,969 2023 29,567 28,959 7,194 4,161 69,882 2024 32,177 31,555 8,152 4,378 76,261 1. Including apartments. - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALL CII - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 FIGURE 2-4 VOLUME OF USE BY CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) FIGURE 2-5 VOLUME OF USE BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-7 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO 2.5 I NDOOR AND O UTDOOR W ATER U SE Water meters are read and recorded every month (or more factually, by a range of days approximating a month). Understanding not only how much water is used, but also when it is used helps in both supply planning and demand management. One way to evaluate water use is to consider whether the water is being used indoors or outside. As this region has a distinct winter season, some inferences can be made regarding water use based on the time of year of the use. With this in mind, it is assumed that water use which occurs in winter months (November through March) is used indoors. Water use during the months of April through October (approximating the landscape irrigation season) is a combination of outdoor and indoor use. Outdoor use, (assumed to be water primarily used to support landscapes) is therefore determined to be the volume of water use during the irrigation season, less the volume of water during the winter months. This process has shortcomings, in that other water use patterns may alter with shifts in the season, but it represents the best estimate based on available data and is accepted industry practice. Figure 2-6 illustrates this analysis within the single-family residential classification. While the reasonableness of this assumption might make sense with residential properties, it is less certain that the same assumption can be made for commercial, institutional, and industrial customers. However, to simplify the discussion of seasonal water use and for purposes of this plan, outdoor water use is water used during the non-winter months and is assumed to be used on landscapes. As installation of AMI technology (Advanced Metering Infrastructure, or smart meters), CII analysis, and WaterMAPS™ is completed, this analysis will greatly improve in accuracy. Estimates for winter and summer usage by customer classifications follow. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mo n t h l y U s e P e r C o n n e c t i o n ( c c f ) Outdoor Use Indoor Use FIGURE 2-6 SEASONAL WATER USE, SINGLE RESIDENCE (2022-2024) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-8 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Water Use by Classification (Figures 2-7 through 2-9). When looking at the broader classifications, the two largest water users are the residential and commercial classifications. Residential use accounts for about half of all outdoor use and a third of all indoor use. Conversely, commercial water accounts for about half of indoor use and a third of the outdoor use. Because more water is used outdoors than indoors, residential water use is greater overall. The percentage of water used indoors and outdoors varies significantly between the various classifications. Almost 80 percent of institutional water use occurs outdoors while industrial outdoor use is less than 20 percent. This makes sense, given that institutional users include parks, schools, and other sub-classifications that are responsible for and maintain outdoor public spaces. Overall, about 46 percent of the water is used indoors and 54 percent is used outdoors. 37.6% 55.3% 20.5% 82.5% 51.7% 45.8% 62.4% 44.7% 79.5% 17.5% 48.3% 54.2% 0%20%40%60%80%100% RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALL CII TOTAL -ALL CATEGORIES Indoor Outdoor 35% 50% 5% 10%Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial 48% 34% 16% 2% Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial FIGURE 2-7 LOCATION OF USE BY CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-8 % TOTAL INDOOR USE BY CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-9 % TOTAL OUTDOOR USE BY CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 2-9 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Water Use by Sub-Classifications (Figures 2-10 through 2-12). Water use varies between sub-classifications. The sub-classification of single-family residence uses more water both indoors and outdoors than other sub-classifications. While the total portion of indoor water use by single-family customers is slightly more than indoor use by businesses, it is more than double the outdoor use of any other sub-classification. This may not be due to overuse but may be a result of property characteristics unique to this sub -classification. Analyzing use at this level, for instance, through programs like WaterMAPS™, can improve conservation programming design, and therefore, effectiveness. This in turn will help to assure that conservation goals are achieved in a manner that is timely, cost effective, and fair. Water use also varies within larger classifications. Residential outdoor use varies from 65 percent for single-family residential use to 31 percent for higher density properties. Among commercial users, Miscellaneous uses more water outdoors, while restaurants and hotels use more indoors. It is not unexpected that Parks has their highest percentage of use outdoors, and should not in itself be interpreted as overuse, but may indicate opportunity to conserve. 58.2% 78.2% 82.5% 72.9% 38.9% 67.4% 3.7% 24.2% 68.3% 69.0% 54.7% 53.4% 83.2% 35.4% 41.8% 21.8% 17.5% 27.1% 61.1% 32.6% 96.3% 75.8% 31.7% 31.0% 45.3% 46.6% 16.8% 64.6% HOSPITAL HOTEL OR MOTEL INDUSTRY RESTAURANT SCHOOL/CHURCH TRIPLEX PARKS & MUNICIPALS MISCELLANEOUS FOURPLEX APARTMENT DUPLEX BUSINESS MIXED USE SINGLE RESIDENCE Indoor Outdoor 1% 3% 10% 1% 4% 0.5% 0.4%3% 1% 16% 3%26% 0.3% 30% Hospital Hotel or Motel Industry Restaurant School/Church Triplex 1%1% 2% 0.3% 6% 0.2% 10% 7% 1%6%2% 19%0.1% 45% Hospital Hotel or Motel Industry Restaurant School/Church FIGURE 2-10 LOCATION OF USE BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-11 % TOTAL INDOOR USE BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-12 % TOTAL OUTDOOR USE BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-10 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Total Volume of Indoor and Outdoor Use (Figures 2-132 and 2-14). Figures 2-13 and 2-14 summarize indoor and outdoor water use by classification and sub- classification in terms of total volume (based on 2024 water use data). This provides some perspective on the total potential for conservation savings in each area. Consistent with previous conclusions, these figures confirm that much of the volume of water saved through conservation will need to come from single- family residences. However, the combined volume of other user types is also significant and cannot be overlooked. Detailed analysis for the commercial, industrial, and institutional classifications will ensure a clearer picture of water use patterns within these sectors. Understanding how businesses, offices, and industry use water helps identify opportunities for conservation, facilitating the development and implementation of effective demand management strategies. Commercial, industrial, and institutional customers are integral partners in the community, and helping them become better water stewards while not imperiling the economy benefits everyone. - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALL CII Indoor Outdoor - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 HOSPITAL HOTEL OR MOTEL INDUSTRY RESTAURANT SCHOOL/CHURCH TRIPLEX PARKS & GOVERNMENT MISCELLANEOUS FOURPLEX APARTMENT DUPLEX BUSINESS SINGLE RESIDENCE Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 2-13 VOLUME OF USE BY LOCATION OF USE AND CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR FIGURE 2-14 VOLUME OF USE BY LOCATION AND SUB-CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-11 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Summary of Per Capita Use by Classification (Table 2-6 and Figure 2-15). Table 2-6 and Figure 2-15 summarize use by classification on a per capita basis as requested in the State’s guidelines for conservation plans. Results are shown for 2024 water use. It should be noted that the per capita calculation has been based on the same equivalent population as used for generating Figure 2-1. As a result, while the figure and table are consistent with previous per capita calculations and may be useful in visualizing the ratio of use between the various classifications, they should not be interpreted as an accurate calculation of per person water use on a residential basis. Additionally, the range of characteristics within the commercial and industrial classifications is far greater than those within other classifications, making evaluations of per capita use by classification dubious in value. For example, commercial classifications contain small clothing boutiques (low water users) and large, many-tabled restaurants (high water users). Oil refineries are included in the industrial classification (high water user), but so are retail shipping warehouses (low water users). Even the residential classification is diverse, including single-family homes and multistory apartments with hundreds of units. Advances in metering technology, improvements in data and records keeping, and continued CII and WaterMAPS™ analysis will refine the data and bring more relevance to this particular statistical report. TABLE 2-6 2024 PER CAPITA WATER USE BY CLASSIFICATION (GPD) Residential 12 Commercial Institutional Industrial Total Indoor 28 41 4 8 82 Outdoor 47 33 15 2 97 Total 76 74 19 10 179 12 It should be noted that values in this table are based on the State of Utah’s methodology for calculating per capita water use (use per category divided by total permanent population). As a result, calculations may appear different than those in the Historical Use and Demand chapters. For example, the reported “Residential” indoor use of 28 gpcd includes single-family household indoor use divided by the total population. The State’s methodology separates single -family residential from apartments and other multiunit housing, placing these classifications in the “Commercial” category. This can result in an underrepresentation of the actual indoor use of residential customers. For purposes of this plan, indoor use of residents is 54 gpcd, and includes single family, duplex, triplex, and multiunit customers. Residential Indoor, 28 Residential Outdoor, 47 Commercial Indoor, 41 Commercial Outdoor, 33 Institutional Indoor, 4 Institutional Outdoor, 15 Industrial Indoor, 8 Industrial Outdoor, 2 Total All Classifications = 179 gpd FIGURE 2-15 PER CAPITA WATER USE BY CLASSIFICATION (GPD) FIGURE 2-15 PER CAPITA WATER USE BY CLASSIFICATION (GPD) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-12 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO 2.6 C ONSERVATION P ROGRESS TO D ATE Significant progress has been made in improved efficiencies and conservation over the last two decades. While detailed records are not available for 2000, detailed analysis of water use patterns for each subsequent year was conducted. To evaluate where and how water was conserved, the water use patterns from 2001 have been compared to water use patterns over the 2022-24 period. The results are shown in Figures 2-15 through 2-18. Monthly Conservation Averaged Across Connections (Figure 2-16). Figure 2-16 shows estimated indoor and outdoor water use in the service area over the course of the year for both recent (average of 2022-24) and historical (2001 and 2016-18) water use patterns. As can be seen in the figure, the community has done an excellent job in saving water both indoors and outdoors and throughout recent years. This seems to indicate that the conservation program and messaging has been helpful in increasing overall awareness of the value of water, the importance of conservation, and implementing effective strategies for accomplishing sustained water use reductions. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Mo n t h l y U s e P e r C o n n e c t i o n ( c c f ) 2022-24 Total Use 2022-24 Indoor Use 2001 Total Use 2001 Indoor Use 2016-18 Indoor Use 2016-18 Total Use FIGURE 2-16 MONTHLY CONSERVATION, AVERAGE OF ALL CONNECTIONS FIGURE 2-16 MONTHLY CONSERVATION, AVERAGE OF ALL CONNECTIONS SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-13 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Percent Water Use Reduction by Classification (Figure 2-17). Figure 2- 17 shows the percent reductions by customer classification since 2001. These results have been calculated based on the reduction in water sales per connection. A few interesting trends can be observed in this figure: i. Conventional thinking has been that conservation will need to come primarily from outdoor water use. However, the percent savings between estimated indoor and outdoor water since 2001 is about the same. There is slightly more savings outdoors than indoors (28.4% vs. 24.2%), but the difference is less than might have been expected. ii. Commercial savings are a little less than half of the savings observed for residential customers since 2001. This does not necessarily indicate that commercial customers have not reduced water use appropriately. Further analysis is required to determine the capacity to reduce water use based on current practices and technologies. Continuing efforts to disaggregate water use within all CII classifications will improve understanding of water use patterns and enhance programing opportunities. iii. Institutional customers have seen the largest reduction in total use of all classifications. This demonstrates the efforts of large property managers in golf, parks, and other open spaces to reduce water use. While there is always more to do, this means institutional users have taken a good first step in conserving water on its properties. iv. Industrial customers appear to be showing an increase in indoor water use since 2001. In considering this result, it should be emphasized that the values reported here are based on sales per connection. While it is possible that per-connection water use has increased since 2001, it is also possible that new industrial connections have been added since 2001, accounting for the apparent increase in average use per connection. Ideally, these results could be presented in a format that only looked at water used by industrial customers that existed in 2001 to see how their actual water use has changed. Unfortunately, the data does not exist to make this distinction. Work is on-going to clarify water use within this classification. For more detailed information, refer to Chapter 4. Industrial customers, however, had the greatest reduction in outdoor use between classifications. 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Total Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 2-17 PERCENT REDUCTION SINCE 2001 BY CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-17 PERCENT REDUCTION SINCE 2001 BY CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-14 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Percent of Water Use Reduction by Sub-Classification (Figure 2-18). Figure 2-18 shows the percent of water use reduction by sub-classification. This provides some additional detail regarding where reductions in per connection water use have occurred since 2001. Similar to what was observed for industrial customers in Figure 2-16, the “negative savings” observed for hospitals, hotels, and apartments are not believed to be per capita increases in water use, but a function of an increase in the number of connections or expansion in service within these sub-classifications since 2001. The conservation reported for indoor use in the miscellaneous classification may not be representative of actual savings, but a function of change in how customers in this classification are being reassigned to other classifications. As work continues in CII analysis, understanding of water use patterns and actual use reductions will improve. Volume Water Use Reduction by Classification (Figure 2-19). Figure 2-19 shows the estimated volume of water saved each year by each customer classification as a result of conservation. These results are an approximation of water volume use reductions as calculated by multiplying the percent reduction per connection by the average use per connection. As a result, it continues to reflect the same problem with industrial use as noted previously. However, it does provide some indication of the magnitude of reductions in various areas. As can be seen in Figure 2-19, use reductions outdoors accounts for slightly more than 54% of the total reduction. While the percent reduction of indoor use to outdoor use is comparatively similar (as noted previously), the larger total volume of water used outdoors results in a greater volume of conservation reductions. A similar conclusion can be made regarding residential water use reductions. About two-thirds of the total decrease in use is derived from residential customers. This is not because residential customers are saving at substantially higher rates, but simply because they, as a classification, use more water than other classifications. Research being conducted utilizing WaterMAPSTM, the CII Analytics Tool, and other methodologies will help to increase understanding of water use, demand reduction, and capacity to conserve across all classifications. See Chapter 4: Water Conservation Practices for program details. -20.0% -10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% Total Indoor Outdoor - 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL TOTAL -ALL CATEGORIES Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 2-19 VOLUMES OF CONSERVATION SINCE 2001 BY LOCATION OF USE AND CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) FIGURE 2-19 VOLUMES OF CONSERVATION SINCE 2001 BY LOCATION OF USE AND CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) FIGURE 2-18 PERCENT REDUCTION SINCE 2001 BY CLASSIFICATION FIGURE 2-18 PERCENT REDUCTION SINCE 2001 BY CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 2-15 HISTORICAL WATER USE: CHAPTER TWO Peak Day Water Use Reduction (Figure 2-20). All of the previous figures have focused on reductions in the volume of water used annually. However, significant strides have been made in reducing peak demands. This is important because most of the water infrastructure facilities must be sized to meet peak demands. Reducing these demands translates to significant savings for the service area. In system-wide numbers, peak day demand has been reduced from 216.3 million gallons per day (mgd) to 160.0 mgd in 2024. This is a reduction of 26 percent. While this is impressive in itself, the reduction is even greater when growth is taken into account. If peak day demand is converted into a per capita value following the same procedure described for total annual demands (see description of Figure 2-1), the observed reduction increases to 38 percent. Figure 2-20 shows how the reduction in per capita peak demand has occurred over time. Water savings associated with this reduction in demand are sizable, as identified in the recently completed storage and conveyance plan. When this new plan13 (using updated demand projections with conservation) is compared to the previous plan14 (based on historical demands without conservation), several projects are now able to be eliminated or decreased in size or scope because of reduced peak demands. Estimated savings associated with downsized or eliminated conveyance project resulting from recent and projected conservation exceed $20 million.15 When considering avoided costs of water supply, storage, and conveyance, the cumulative cost savings associated with water conservation between 2000 and 2024 is approximately $420 million (see Appendix P). 13 Salt Lake City Water Storage and Conveyance Plan, BC&A, 2020 14 Major Conveyance Study, BC&A, January 2007 15 Based on elimination or downsizing of projects identified in the 2007 Major Conveyance Study that are no longer needed. This includes elimination of the 4500 South Transmission Main and Storage Tank (Project 3.3B), 7800 South Low Improvements (Projects 3.6A, 3.6B, 3.6C, and 3.12B), and adjustments to the size of the East-West Aqueduct (Projects 3.1A and 3.1B). 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Us e P e r C a p i t a ( g p c d ) FIGURE 2-20 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES PER CAPITA PEAK DAY WATER USE (GPD) FIGURE 2-20 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES PER CAPITA PEAK DAY WATER USE (GPD) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-1 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE DRAFT CHAPTER THREE: CONSERVATION GOALS 3.0 I NTRODUCTION As discussed in Chapter 1, conservation is an essential part of water resource planning to meet the future water needs of its community. The purpose of this chapter is to articulate and describe the goals for conservation that will: • Keep on track to meet its long-term water supply needs. • Facilitate efforts to increase resource and system resilience in the face of identified risks, including climate change. • Encourage the continued wise use of an important limited resource; and • Be consistent with conservation goals established by the State, Central Utah Project, Alliance for Water Efficiency, US-Environmental Protection Agency, and this plan. This chapter highlights historical and proposed goals from various sources that are relevant to current conservation planning efforts. Included are discussions of specific goals articulated in the Governor’s Water Conservation Goal, the Utah Lake System contract with the Central Utah Project, and the recently updated State Regional Conservation Goals. Also included is a discussion of the relationship between conservation goals and the ongoing need to support efforts to protect Great Salt Lake. Unless explicitly stated, all goals are listed in terms of customer sales. Achievements towards programmatic goals are also discussed in this chapter, such as those outlined in the Governor’s Strategic Water Plan, American Water Works Association (AWWA) G-480 Checklist, Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) Landscape Guidelines, and the State Division of Water Resources Water Conservation Plan Checklist. Additionally, the Appendices contain these guidelines and goals in checklist format. Central to this chapter and the discussions contained are these newly developed established conservation goals. These goals have been developed based on outcomes of the Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan and reflect current and future projections of both supply and demand within the service area. While not identical to the State Regional Goals, these goals meet or SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-2 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE exceed these regional goals and are more in keeping with our own system, resources, and characteristics. 3.1 C ONSERVATION G OALS 3.1.1 GOVERNOR’S 2001 STATEWIDE WATER CONSERVATION GOAL In 2001, Governor Mike Leavitt published a statewide conservation goal to reduce per capita water use by 25 percent (as compared to water use from the benchmark year of 2000). Governor Gary Herbert later enhanced that goal by reducing the timeline to be met by 2025. While the conservation goals over the years have been guided by supply and demand, as well as climate and drought concerns, the Governor’s Statewide Goal has been used as a benchmark for measuring program achievements. Additionally, the statewide goals were incorporated into the water supply plan as part of the SLCDPU’s 2007 Major Conveyance Study. As documented in Chapter 2, water users within the service area have thus far stayed significantly ahead of this goal in its efforts to reduce water use. 3.1.2 CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT CONSERVATION AGREEMENT (UTAH LAKE SYSTEM CONSERVATION GOALS) As part of its request for water from the Utah Lake System (ULS), the City has entered into an agreement (through Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy) with Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD) to achieve a minimum level of conservation. This conservation requirement specified a reduction in per capita water use (from year 2000 levels) of 12.5 percent by 2020 and 25 percent by 2050. While this is an important goal from a contractual standpoint, it has not been the driver of conserva tion programming goals as internal conservation goals have been more aggressive. However, achieving this goal results in avoided additional cost on water purchased through these agreements, adding to the value of the conservation programming beyond the achievement of water use reduction goals. 3.1.3 RECOMMENDED STATE WATER STRATEGY, JULY 2017 In 2013, Governor Gary Herbert convened a group of stakeholders with extensive backgrounds to form the State Water Strategy Advisory Team. Out of this process, a diverse group of water practitioners, advocates, and academics were asked to help devise a state water strategic plan. Stephanie Duer, the City’s water conservation manager, participated in this process, representing both Salt Lake City specifically, and municipal interests in general. The group examined a range of issues, including, but not limited to conservation, competing demands on water, the roles of technology and science, how law and policy affect our relationship with water, and sustainability and the environment. The outcome of this process is the Recommended State Water Strategy, published in 2017. Strategies were organized into eleven categories, with the first being the role of conservation in supporting a sustained water supply. Conservation, demand management, demand reduction, improvements in efficiencies, and the role of technology and science also appear in each of the other ten strategies. Though this strategic plan does not articulate specific goals, it does outline ideas and approaches to enhancing and building on conservation efforts. Those strategies pertaining most closely to urban demand management and conservation have been collected and organized in a list in the appendices. These strategies were tracked as part of the development of this plan a nd have also been integrated into day-to-day programming as appropriate. 3.1.4 UTAH’S REGIONAL M&I WATER CONSERVATION GOALS, NOVEMBER 2019 AND JUNE 2025 Over the last several years, efforts have been made to better understand how the State of Utah manages water conservation efforts in the state, including the process for identifying and assigning water use reduction goals. These efforts include a legislative audit completed in 2015 and the Recommended State Water Strategy completed in 2017 by the Governor’s Water Strategy Advisory Team (GSWAT) (see Section 3.1.3). One of the major conclusions of both documents was the need to update the State’s conservation goal to make it more regionally appropriate and relevant. One of the limitations of the historical statewide water conservation goal is that it failed to integrate the effects of regional climate, local and discrete supply, and water use pattern differences. Utah is a large state with diverse terrain, climates, populations, development patterns, and attitudes that affect what water is available and how it is used. With this in mind, the State commissioned a study to reevaluate the statewide conservation goal, and to establish water conservation goals that reflect each region’s characteristics, challenges, and SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-3 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE opportunities as related to water. The result is Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals. The goals established in the Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals are shown in Figure 3-1.16 For the Salt Lake region (consisting of Salt Lake and Tooele Counties), the new goal was to reduce per capita water use to 187 gallons per capita per day (gpcd), an additional 11% reduction from the average use in the region observed in 2015. In 2025 (during the preparation of this plan), the Division of Water Resources presented a few modifications to this goal. The major proposed changes included moving from 2015 as a baseline to the average of 2015 to 2019 and changing the goal for a specific gpcd value for each region to a percentage reduction to be applied evenly to all entities. In other words, the new regional goal for SLCDPU would be an 11% reduction from their average water use from 2015 to 2019. While not official “goals”, the study also identifies some projected future levels of conservation. This includes achieving a cumulative 15% reduction in use by 2045 and 19% by 2065. The existing SLCDPU service area is contained in the Salt Lake Region, which also includes all of Salt Lake and Tooele Counties. 16 Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals. Utah Division of Water Resources. November 2019. FIGURE 3-1 UTAH’S REGIONAL M&I WATER CONSERVATION GOALS F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -1 U TAH ’S R EGIONAL M&I W ATER C ONSERVATION G OALS F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -12F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -1 U TAH ’S R EGIONAL M&I W ATER C ONSERVATION G OALS F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -1 U TAH ’S R EGIONAL M&I W ATER C ONSERVATION G OALS SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-4 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 3.1.5 WATER CONSERVATION AND GREAT SALT LAKE Salt Lake City is committed to doing what it can to support efforts to support and restore Great Salt Lake. As part of that effort, additional conservation scenarios are being evaluated that might achieve goals beyond those stated in Chapter 3. Part of this evaluation is the role of depletion in achieving additional water savings for Great Salt Lake. This task has been added to ongoing research relating to refining projected demand reductions (see Table 4-6, R-17). 3.1.6 SALT LAKE CITY WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND MASTER PLAN CONSERVATION GOALS As part of its water supply and demand study, a number of conservation scenarios were considered. These scenarios parallel similar scenarios developed for the State’s regional conservation goals. Ultimately, a scenario was selected (referred to as Scenario 2 in the Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan)17 that both achieves the goal of continuing to reliably supply water for long-term needs and is slightly more aggressive than the new state regional goals. This scenario is the new conservation goal moving forward. 3.1.7 COMPARISON OF CONSERVATION GOALS Historical and proposed water conservation goals are summarized and compared in Figure 3-2. All values are shown in terms of per capita water use, based on equivalent population adjusted for employment (see Chapter 2). As shown in the figure, the proposed conservation goal for this plan is consistent wit h the State’s regional conservation goals and meets or exceeds all other historical goals. Included in the figure is also the observed per capita water use in the service area. From the figure, it can be seen that cu stomers within the service area are meeting or exceeding all of its previously established goals. There was a slight rebound in per capita water use last year. Even with the excellent results achieved to date, this emphasizes the need for continued and increased efforts in the promotion of long-term conservation, including enhanced education and outreach efforts. 17 Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, page 2-11 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 Pe r C a p i t a W a t e r U s e ( g p c d ) Year Metered Per Capita ULS Conservation Goal (12.5% reduction by 2020, Trend Line of Actual Historic State Conservation Goal (25% reduction by 2025) New City Conservation Goal in Supply and Demand Master Plan (Scenario 2) Utah's Regional Conservation Goal 11% by 2030 Future Regional Conservation Goal Projections 15% by 2040 19% by 2065 FIGURE 3-2 SLCDPU SERVICE AREA CONSERVATION TREND SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-5 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 3.2 D ETAILS OF SLCDPU C ONSERVATION G OALS While an overall conservation goal is an important first step in planning, it will be difficult to turn the goal into reality unless we understand the individual components of the goal, that is, who is using the water, and how and when they are using it. The purpose of this section is to provide additional information regarding the conservation goals so that more detailed plans can be developed to achieve discreet components of the goal. 3.2.1 OVERALL CONSERVATION GOAL For the planning window of the Salt Lake City Supply and Demand Master Plan, the long-term conservation goal can be expressed in the following metrics summarized in Table 3-1 and Table 3-2. TABLE 3-1 LONG-TERM CONSERVATION GOALS EXPRESSED AS PER CAPITA USE (GALLONS SALES PER DAY)18 2015-19 SLCDPU Observed Regional M&I Conservation Goal for 2024 2022-24 SLCDPU Observed Utah’s Regional M&I Goal Long- term (2065) SLCDPU Long-term Goal (2060) 195 182 171 158 146 TABLE 3-2 PERCENT REDUCTION IN PER CAPITA SALES TO ACHIEVE LONG-TERM GOALS State Regional Long- term Goal from 2015-29 Observed (2065) SLCDPU Historic Long- term Goal from 2015-19 Observed (2060) SLCDPU Long-term Goal from 2022-24 Actual 19.0%19 25.1% 14.6% As can be seen in the tables, long-term goals exceed Utah’s Regional M&I Conservation Goals for the Salt Lake region. 18 Based on equivalent population adjusted for employment as described in Chapter 2. 3.2.2 CONSERVATION GOAL BY CUSTOMER CLASSIFICATION As a starting point, it is useful to define the water use characteristics that will need to be achieved in order to reach long-term water use reduction goals. Changes in per capita water demands may result from a number of factors, not all of which are the result of more prudent water use. For example, increases in density (and the corresponding decrease in average lot size) may significantly decrease per capita outdoor water use, even if water use patterns do not otherwise change. Economic growth and socio-economic conditions, improvements in fixture and appliance efficiency, and climate change are examples of other factors that may, for better or worse, affect demand. To better measure where savings will be derived through conservation activities, we need first understand the who and how of water use. Besides the factors mentioned above, it is also helpful to examine water use by grouping customers together that exhibit similar characteristics, demographics, or water use behaviors. For example, homeowners use water differently than do businesses, and both have water use patterns different from schools. By grouping water users into classifications with similar characteristics, we can improve water use analysis and enhance programing to achieve demand reduction. Setting conservation goals for water use reduction in specific water use areas will enhance our opportunities to successfully achieve our conservation goals. For conservation planning purposes, customers have been disaggregated into the primary classifications of residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial, which are the same classifications used in Chapter 2 to facilitate analysis of historical water use. These groups have been further divided into subclassifications (see Section 2.3). 19 State Regional Goals measured as reduction from average 2015 to 2019 water use. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-6 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE The analysis of historical use and projected future growth presented in Chapter 2 is used here to estimate how much savings may come from each classification and subclassification based on the following general assumptions: • Residential indoor water use to be reduced to 49 gpcd • Outdoor water use to be reduced to 22.8 inches average irrigation • CII indoor reduction to be determined For Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional customers (CII), it has been assumed that outdoor conservation will occur at the same rate as in the residential classification, but indoor water use will be reduced in an amount equal to approximately 50 percent of the reduction observed in residential use.20 This is based on maintaining the same ratio of conservation between residential and non-residential classifications as observed in the past (see Chapter 2). As work continues in evaluating water use in CII sectors, enhanced understanding of disaggregated water use patterns will facilitate establishment of more meaningful goals within the CII sector. For more details, see Chapter 4. Based on these assumptions, projected conservation by classification and season of use is summarized in Figures 3-3 through 3-5. Additional Conservation Throughout the Year (Figure 3 -3). Figure 3-3 shows current indoor and outdoor water use over the course of the year, as well as projected demand reductions needed to attain the planned long -term conservation goal. As seen in the figure, additional conservation is needed both indoors and outdoors, as well as throughout the course of the year. 20 The exception to this is the apartment sub-classification where it has been assumed that indoor water savings will be the same as residential. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mo n t h l y U s e P e r C o n n e c t i o n ( c c f ) 2022-24 Total Use 2022-24 Indoor Use Total Use - Conservation Target Indoor Use - Conservation Target FIGURE 3-3 ADDITIONAL CONSERVATION BY MONTH AVERAGED ACROSS ALL CONNECTIONS SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-7 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE Estimated Additional Conservation by Customer Classification (Figure 3-4). Figure 3-4 provides estimated, disaggregated conservation targets for both indoor and outdoor water use by customer classification. Target outdoor conservation on a percentage basis is identical for all groups. Indoor targets vary depending on the estimated potential conservation for each group based on historical average use by classification. Note that indoor industrial conservation is indicated as only about half of what is expected for other CII customers. This does not mean that industrial users are not expected to make the same effort to conserve water as other CII customers. An active conservation program among industrial customers is recommended and necessary. All industrial users are expected to look for ways in which they can improve their water use. The lower indoor conservation target at this writing is a recognition that there is a great deal of variability in the nature of industrial water use that makes the establishment of a single, aggregate reduction goal difficult. Further analysis is necessary to better understand water use patterns and the capacity to conserve within this and other CII sub- classifications. 7.0% 7.1% 7.2% 7.3% 7.4% 7.5% 7.6% 7.7% 7.8% 7.9% Combined Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 3-4 ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL PERCENTAGE TO ACHIEVE LONG-TERM GOAL BY CUSTOMER CLASSIFICATION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-8 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE Estimated Additional Conservation Per Classification by Volume (Figure 3-5).21 In addition to considering percent reductions, it is often useful to understand the accompanying volume of water that will need to be reduced within each classification. Figure 3-5 provides perspective in this regard. As can be seen in the figure, most of the water reduction in the service area will need to come from residential customers. This is not a conscious attempt to target these customers but simply a reflection of the size of this customer classification, its current volume of use, and the estimated capacity to conserve within this classification. To aid the residential customers conceptualize the level of conservation proposed in this plan, Table 3-3 identifies target conservation on a per-household basis over time. Even though other customer classifications may currently appear to have lower reduction demands expressed, conservation will be needed in all areas to reach planned short- and long-term goals. Also, as understanding and evaluation of water use continues, with the accompanying analysis of the capacity to conserve, these conservation targets should be reviewed and refined. TABLE 3-3 RECOMMENDED PER-HOUSEHOLD INTERIM CONSERVATION GOALS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS 2024 10-year Long-Term Total Per-Household Use Target (gpd) 389 377 359 Per-Household Indoor Use Target (gpd) 138 134 127 Per-Household Outdoor Use Target (gpd) 251 244 232 21 Water use reduction for industrial customers will be more clearly defined as CII analysis continues. - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALL CII TOTAL -ALL CATEGORIES Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 3-5 VOLUME OF CONSERVATION NEEDED TO ACHIEVE LONG-TERM GOAL BY LOCATION OF USE AND CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR, EXISTING CUSTOMERS) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-9 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 3.2.3 CONSERVATION GOALS BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION As with analysis of historical water use, conservation goals may also be divided into sub-classifications, a practice helpful in the design and implementation of conservation strategies. The result is highly targeted, efficient programs. The limitation is that there is a great deal of difference between customers within the classifications, and so a stated reduction goal that is averaged for the larger classification may not align reasonably with specific water patterns of discrete customers within a classification. For example, while the residential classification generally has similar patterns between its sub-classifications, commercial and industrial classifications are very diverse, from art galleries to grocery stores and bottling plants to oil refineries. Being aware of these variabilities highlights the need for further analysis. With these caveats in mind, projected conservation by sub -classification and season of use is summarized in Table 3-3 and Figure 3-6. Figures 3-7 through 3- 10 further highlight the differences in water use patterns across various industries. It should be emphasized that savings in each sub-classification are an estimate for planning purposes only. As additional information and insight is gained, modifications to these numbers will occur and it may be determined that more conservation is appropriate for some groups and less in others. These types of adjustments are expected and to be encouraged, as conservation programing is adjusted to optimize its program impacts while ensuring water use reduction “burdens” are shared equitably between all water customers. It should also be noted that total volumes contained in Table 3-3 are for existing customers only. As future customers are added, these new customers, whether residential or CII, will also need to contribute toward achieving water conservation goals. Although not a true “reduction” in water use (since they have not yet used water), future customers will contribute to reducing per capita water use as they implement the same improvements in water use efficiency as is being pursued by existing customers. When the efforts of both existing and future users are combined, the total volume of reduced water use (compared to existing water use patterns) is expected to be an additional 16,100 AF/year over the current annual use levels. When considering only the new reduction goal and not what has already been achieved, approximately 6,800 AF/yr of this total is expected to come from residential customers with the remaining 9,300 AF/yr. coming from CII classifications. - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 HOSPITAL HOTEL OR MOTEL INDUSTRY RESTAURANT SCHOOL/CHURCH TRIPLEX PARKS & MUNICIPALS MISCELLANEOUS FOURPLEX APARTMENT DUPLEX BUSINESS SINGLE RESIDENCE Indoor Outdoor FIGURE 3-6 VOLUME OF CONSERVATION NEEDED TO ACHIEVE LONG-TERM GOAL BY LOCATION OF USE AND SUB-CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR, EXISTING CUSTOMERS) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-10 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 11,490 10,667 8,637 7,686 9,048 - 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CC F Average Median 25%75% 390 443 353 444 379 - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CC F Average Median 25%75% 17,154 16,902 14,082 16,863 15,467 - 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CC F Average Median 25%75% 738 679 577 760 698 - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CC F Average Median 25%75% FIGURE 3-7 HOTEL AND MOTEL TOTAL ANNUAL USE FIGURE 3-8 FINANCE AND INSURANCE TOTAL ANNUAL USE FIGURE 3-9 HOSPITALS TOTAL ANNUAL USE FIGURE 3-10 REAL ESTATE AND RENTAL LEASING TOTAL ANNUAL USE SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-11 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE When analyzing water use, particularly when it comes to setting water use reduction goals, it is not enough to consider total water use, or even estimates of seasonally driven water use. More relevant are estimates that consider the efficiency of that water use and if there exists a capacity to conserve. In 2019, in conjunction with USU/CWEL, the Utility launched the WaterMAPS™ program. The WaterMAPS™ program integrates parcel data, land cover data, water meter data, and weather data to calculate what is called the “Landscape Irrigation Ratio (LIR).” LIR values indicate how efficiently water is being used to maintain a landscape and whether the water use is outpacing the water need. LIRs are calculated on both an annual and a monthly basis. Figure 3-11 shows the mean LIR for all evaluated CII connections; Figure 3-12 shows the LIRs by CII sub-classifications. This analysis helps to refine outdoor water conservation goals within the various CII classifications. FIGURE 3-11 CII MEAN LIR F IGURE 3 -12F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -12 CII LIR B Y S ERVICE C ONNECTION F IGURE 3 -12F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR F IGURE 3 -12F IGURE 3 -11 C II M EAN L IR FIGURE 3-12 CII LIR BY SERVICE CONNECTION F IGURE 3 -12 CII LIR B Y S ERVICE C ONNECTION F IGURE 3 -12 CII LIR B Y S ERVICE C ONNECTION F IGURE 3 -12 CII LIR B Y S ERVICE C ONNECTION SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-12 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE TABLE 3-4 LONG-TERM (2060) CONSERVATION GOALS BY SUB-CLASSIFICATION Location of Use Hospital Hotel or Motel Industry Restaurant School or Church or Charity Triplex Parks & Government Miscellaneous Fourplex Apartment Duplex Business Single Residence Total Cu r r e n t An n u a l Us e (AF ) 22 Total 757 1,449 4,378 510 3,977 250 4,175 4,074 721 7,850 1,920 16,729 29,286 76,076 Indoor 441 1,134 3,611 372 1,548 168 154 987 492 5,419 1,049 8,928 10,373 34,675 Outdoor 316 316 767 138 2,429 82 4,020 3,087 229 2,431 870 7,802 18,913 41,401 Da i l y U s e P e r Co n n e c t i o n ( g p d ) Total 16,093 9,656 14,369 1,566 6,432 433 5,049 5,218 603 4,166 382 2,300 389 66,656 Indoor 9,370 7,554 11,851 1,141 2,503 292 186 1,264 412 2,876 209 1,227 138 39,022 Outdoor 6,722 2,102 2,518 425 3,929 141 4,863 3,954 191 1,290 173 1,073 251 27,634 Go a l f o r F u t u r e An n u a l U s e (A F ) Total 700 1,342 4,056 472 3,675 230 3,850 3,762 665 7,237 1,770 15,471 27,000 70,229 Indoor 409 1,051 3,348 345 1,435 155 143 915 454 4,995 967 8,278 9,562 32,057 Outdoor 292 291 707 128 2,240 75 3,707 2,847 211 2,241 802 7,193 17,438 38,172 Re q u i r e d Re d u c t i o n i n An n u a l U s e (A F ) Total 57 107 323 38 302 20 325 313 56 613 150 1,258 2,286 5,848 Indoor 32 83 263 27 113 13 11 72 38 424 82 650 811 2,618 Outdoor 25 25 60 11 189 6 314 241 18 190 68 609 1,475 3,229 % S a v i n g s Total 7.5% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 7.6% 7.8% 7.8% 7.7% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.5% 7.8% 7.7% Indoor 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 6.7% 7.3% 7.3% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.3% 7.8% 7.6% Outdoor 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% 7.8% Sa v i n g s P e r Co n n e c t i o n (g p d ) Total 1,207 714 1,059 116 489 34 393 400 47 325 30 173 30 5,124 Indoor 682 550 863 83 182 19 14 92 32 225 16 89 11 2,947 Outdoor 524 164 196 33 306 11 379 308 15 101 14 84 20 2,155 22 For the purposes of this table, all volumes are shown for existing customers only. As future users join the system, it is ass umed that they will use water at the same reduced level as identified in the conservation goals. SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-13 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 3.2.4 FIVE- AND TEN-YEAR CONSERVATION GOALS As noted previously, current goals are ahead of the Governor’s Water Conservation Goals and ULS Goals. With this in mind, it is not enough to meet the new Regional goals; more aggressive goals will be important–both to keep pace with long-term supply plans and to model good water resource stewardship. Correspondingly, this conservation plan has identified 5 - and 10- year conservation goals as summarized in Table 3 -4. These goals follow the overall structure of the regional goals23 but are more aggressive to account for conservation reductions already achieved and the need to both sustain those achievements and meet additional water use reductions. To assist Department personnel in identifying and implementing the practices and programming needed to meet these goals, Table 3-6 provides the estimated water use reduction need of the various classifications. This table calculates the needed reduction in total volume required to reach the goals, along with disaggregation of how this reduction might be divided between indoor and outdoor use. While it is not necessary to achieve the exact mix of conservation shown in this table, and it is certain that these volumes will need to be revised over time as more information is collected, this table provides staff with a starting point to estimate how and where conservation efforts should be initially focused. Additional break-downs of recommended residential conservation goals are also included in appendix Q. 23 Utah’s Regional M&I Water Conservation Goals for the Salt Lake Region indicates that just over half of the long-term goal should be achieved in the next ten years (234 gpcd to 201 gpcd [2030 Goal] vs. 169 gpcd [2065 long-term TABLE 3-5 RECOMMENDED INTERIM CONSERVATION GOALS 2024 5-year 10-year Long-Term Per Capita Use (gpcd) 179 174 166 146 Percent Reduction Per Capita - 2.9% 7.4% 18.7% Percent Reduction Indoors - 1.2% 3.0% 7.6% Percent Reduction Outdoors* - 1.2% 3.1% 7.8% Percent Reduction Total Use - 1.2% 3.0% 7.7% *Represents reduction in total outdoor water use for existing customers TABLE 3-6 INTERIM CONSERVATION GOALS BY CLASSIFICATION (AF/YEAR) Classification Location 5-Year 10-Year Long-term Residential Indoors 1,033 1,704 3,356 Outdoors 1,714 2,828 5,569 Total 2,746 4,532 8,926 Commercial Indoors 1,407 2,322 4,574 Outdoors 1,202 1,983 3,906 Total 2,609 4,305 8,479 Institutional Indoors 135 224 440 Outdoors 550 908 1,788 Total 686 1,131 2,228 Industrial Indoors 287 474 934 Outdoors 65 108 213 Total 353 582 1,147 All Classifications Indoors 2,863 4,724 9,305 Outdoors 3,531 5,826 11,475 Total 6,394 10,550 20,780 projection]). This same ratio has been assumed for the 10-year goal, adjusted to account both the lower initial starting point and more aggressive goal. The 5 - year goal has been similarly interpolated. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 3-14 CONSERVATION GOALS: CHAPTER THREE 3.2.5 ADDITIONAL CONSERVATION POTENTIAL FOR GREAT SALT LAKE The Utility recognizes that more water conservation than the proposed conservation goals may be needed in the future to maintain and improve water levels of Great Salt Lake. With this perspective, two additional conservation scenarios have been developed for consideration which would reduce outdoor water demands by 10% and 15% more than the proposed conservation scenario. These additional water demand savings would allow the Utility to dedicate more water to bolstering the health of Great Salt Lake. These additional scenarios are referred to as GSL Alternative 2 and GSL Alternative 3. The resulting water reduction requirements of these alternatives are shown in Table 3 -6. Additionally, the estimated impacts to long-term water demands are shown in Figure 3-13. TABLE 3-7 LONG-TERM (2060) GSL CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVE GOALS 2024 Proposed Goal GSL Alternative 2 GSL Alternative 3 Per Capita Use (gpcd) 179 146 139 136 Indoor Per Capita Use (gpcd) 82.0 79.5 79.5 79.5 Outdoor Irrigation Application Rate (inches/yr)* 24.1 22.8 20.5 19.4 Percent Reduction Outdoors from Existing - 5.3% 15.3% 20.3% Percent Reduction from Total use - 18.7% 22.4% 24.3% *Represents the reduction in outdoor irrigation application rate 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 Pe r C a p i t a W a t e r U s e ( g p c d ) Year Metered Per Capita Water Use Trend Line of Actual Conservation New City Conservation Goal in Supply and Demand Master Plan (Scenario 2) GSL Alternative 2 GSL Alternative 3 FIGURE 3-13 CONSERVATION ALTERNATIVES SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 PAGE 4-1 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR DRAFT CHAPTER FOUR: CONSERVATION PROGRAMS, PRACTICES, AND MEASURES 4.0 I NTRODUCTION Few resources are as critical to a community’s health, well-being, or economy as water. Over the duration of its history, the Utility has protected its water resources, from critical watersheds, through urban riparian corridors, in the stormwater system, its water rights, and, of course, by practicing and promoting the wise and efficient use of water. This plan not only reflects that history of conservation; it demonstrates the continued commitment to lead through example. With reliance on research, science, and experience, and in partnership with the community, academicians, and stakeholders, the Utility strives to achieve sustainable reductions in water use to ensure a reliable and secure water supply today and for the future. For us, water is not just a r esource; it is a responsibility. The first steps in developing effective programing are to understand how much water there will be, who the customers are and how they use water, and what future water use will look like to ensure a sustained supply and fair access. Chapters One, Two, and Three address these questions, respectively. This chapter describes the programming that will help maintain a sustainable, reliable supply and achieve the goals described within this plan. Programs, and practices need to consider short- and long-term conservation goals and improve water efficiency or reduce water waste, all while maintaining quality-of-life standards. Programs must be relevant to how water is used or wasted, present meaningful opportunities for engagement to all customers, and be equitable in reach and access. Foremost, conservation programming must move attitudes, behaviors, practices, and actions in such a manner as to facilitate meaningful, measurable, and sustained conservation. This chapter focuses on the programs initiated or proposed that meet the above criteria and support and facilitate short- and long-term water use reductions that will help to meet the conservation goals outlined in Chapter 3. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-2 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.1 C ONSERVATION P LANNING P ROCESS There are many manuals, texts, and papers describing methods for successful conservation planning and programming, and this planning process has been informed by and benefited from those resources. The first steps in program planning involve assessing supply and demand, evaluating historical use, and establishing water use reduction goals, both systemwide and by the customer classifications described in previous chapters. This chapter addresses the discussion of program selection criteria, description of programs, summary of evaluation processes, and program outcomes where available. Though these steps are identified here linearly, the process is fluid and iterative, reflecting both the nature and dyn amics of planning processes, and the shifting nature of our relationship to water. 4.1.1 CRITERIA The criteria for program selection are simple; programming should: • Help to reduce water use or water waste, • Enhance water stewardship ethos, • Have community and political support, • Be equitable and fair, and • Provide a cost-benefit to the Utility and its rate payers. Though not all programs exhibit all these criteria, all programs have most of these criteria. 4.1.2 EVALUATION Program evaluation is not as straightforward as identifying a quantity of water saved. Some programs, such as outreach, may be difficult to measure in terms of gallons saved, but they bring a high degree of community benefit and add to our understanding of water. Research and metrics, on the other hand, present ample opportunity for measuring program outcomes, either through gallons saved or participants reached. Every effort was made to identify some method of measurement and provide a benchmark or metric to facilitate program evaluation; these measures are provided in Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, and 4-6. Other methods for evaluation include industry best practices or regulatory frameworks for plan development. The appendices include checklists that informed the development of this plan and against which it is compared. • EPA WaterSense Program • ANSI/AWWA G480 Conservation Program Operations and Management • Utah DWRe Water Conservation Master Plan Checklist • State of Utah Regional Goals 4.1.3 RESOURCE ALLOCATION A necessary step in this process is the establishment of fiscal and staffing resource budgets. Fiscal year 2025 allocations for specific program measures are included in this plan and are included in program measure focuses where available and listed in Tables 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6. More extensive future budget planning is a component of the Research and Metrics Program. Combined program budget allocation for the 2025 fiscal year is approximately $672,000. This does not include program measure funds derived from partnerships, grants, or other sources. 4.1.4 TERMINOLOGY Within this chapter and throughout the plan are various terms used to express conservation planning, goal setting, and program development. Some terms used extensively in this chapter follow: Water conservation. Those practices, techniques, and technologies that reduce water consumption, water loss, and water waste, or improve the efficiency of water use. Program. A set of conservation practices and/or measures planned to be implemented together. Practice. An action, procedure, or method that is beneficial, empirically proven, cost-effective, and widely accepted in the professional community. Measure. A device, incentive, or technology targeted at a particular type of end user or water use that, when implemented, will save water. Measures may be a component of a specific practice. For example, maintaining an irrigation system in working condition is a practice; installing high efficiency nozzles is a measure, and offering irrigation system evaluations which assist in improving practices and identify measures, such as the Water Checks, is a program. For a more extensive glossary, please refer to the Appendices. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-3 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.2 C ONSERVATION BY C ONNECTION To identify the water conservation goals expressed in this plan, projections of future reliable water supply coupled with the optimal strategy to plan to not use every drop (reserved water) were analyzed through the lens of historical water use patterns and future predicted growth. These goals are expressed in terms of millions of gallons and acre feet by classifications and subclassifications. While these expressions meet the language of various standards for conservation planning, they hardly meet the intent, which is to derive meaningful, actionable goals to guide and measure conservation programs and outcomes for actual water users. It is this level of conservation goal setting that is attempted here. Using population and economic growth indicators, the number of service connections, and historical use by classification and sub -classification, along with future supply and demand projections, we derive water use reduction goals within classifications by connection as summarized in Table 4-1. TABLE 4-1 ADDITIONAL REDUCTION IN PER CONNECTION USE NEEDED (GPD/CONNECTION) There are limitations to these calculations. As mentioned previously in earlier chapters, while the customers in some classifications are relatively uniform in use characteristics (residential), others are much more diverse (commercial and industrial). Even within the residential classifications, there are distinctions in use patterns. The differences in water use patterns between single-family homes and multi-family units, small urban and large suburban lots, owners and renters, are examples of the complexity of this task. Another limitation is that the assumption of future use based on historical practice does not account for innovations in technology that will inevitably change how water is used or measured, nor can it account for changes in population or development projections. Installation of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) will greatly enhance our understanding of water use and waste at the connection-level, study is ongoing to determine how this technology will impact use as an influencer of behavior. Assumptions made regarding landscapeable area and irrigation requirements described in Chapter 2 (see Figure 1-2) depended on data from the year 2000. But we know from observation, turf studies conducted by the Center for Water Efficient Landscaping (USU/CWEL), as well as initial findings derived from WaterMAPS™ that those estimates are likely unnecessarily generous. As research continues, we will gain insights into the capacity to conserve in landscapes and thus inform that area of programing and also future planning scenarios. The limitations become more obvious when CII classifications are evaluated. Landscape nurseries, laundromats, and breweries are all classified as Commercial, though it is apparent they have vastly different water use profiles as well as different needs when addressing conservation. Industries range from shipping warehouses with little water demand to oil refineries, much greater consumers of water by comparison. The CII analytics project, as well as AMI will greatly enhance understanding of water use by discreet commercial and industrial profiles. Collaboration with Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE), US - EPA WaterSense, CalWEP, and others will help identify benchmarks and standards by which to evaluate these sub-classifications and enhance meaningful programming. Even with these limitations, the value of moving towards goals of this nature should not be ignored or overlooked. As understanding of water use patterns is deepened, these initial estimates for water use reduction will be refined and made even more relevant. Classification Location 5-Year 10-Year Long-term Residential Indoors 14 23 46 Outdoors 10 17 34 Total 24 40 79 Commercial Indoors 314 517 1019 Outdoors 214 353 695 Total 527 870 1714 Institutional Indoors 36 59 117 Outdoors 121 199 393 Total 157 259 509 Industrial Indoors 159 262 516 Outdoors 35 57 112 Total 193 319 628 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-4 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.3 S OCIOECONOMIC I MPACTS OF C ONSERVATION Effective conservation programming considers the characteristics of the customers using water, both as individuals and within user classifications. While it is commonplace to consider characteristics such as “single-family residence”, “apartment”, or “restaurant”, less common is the integration of demographics and socioeconomic characteristics into the analytical and programing framework. According to Beecher, et al,24 neglecting the unintended effects of conservation programming on socioeconomic groups can result in unexpected analytical, practical, and political consequences, which may undermine desired program outcomes and have negative impacts on some customer groups. The service area is a diverse community in both its characteristics and its water needs. Understanding, and being responsive to this diversity helps to build positive relationships and ensure we meet our long-term goals of a resilient water supply. Income, household composition, housing, language and ethnicity, education, and special needs are all important characteristics that may affect water use. Businesses, too, have characteristics that need to be identified and analyzed so that programing builds partnerships and increases participation. As conservation programming is developed, understanding the relationship between water use and socioeconomic and other demographic characteristics enhances program outcomes while ensuring that the end user has the tools and support necessary to make good choices regarding water use. Additionally, this understanding also helps to identify potential barriers to participation, improving overall program design, reducing unintended consequences, and increasing participation. Conservation programing can be an effective tool to mitigate the impact of inevitable price increases across all user classifications and socioeconomic characteristics. Helping customers understand their relationship with water and providing meaningful and actionable tools and knowledge to make better choices helps customers manage water costs while also reducing their water footprint. The Utility recently completed a technical memorandum which provides an analysis of the relationship between water conservation and water rates. This analysis showed significant savings attributed to a sustained 24 Beecher, Janice A., Thomas Chesnutt, David Pekelney. Socioeconomic Impacts of Water Conservation. AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 2001. reduction in water use in the avoided costs associated with developing new water supply, water storage, and capital improvement costs when compared to water demand without conservation. Communicating these savings to customers may enhance general understanding of the value to conserve, as well as conveying the practical outcomes of a robust conservation program. To be successful and sustainable, everyone—every person, business, industry, school, church, government agency—needs to be engaged in reducing water demand and protecting our water resources. Effective programing should facilitate water demand reduction across all sectors and user classifications, without placing the burden for conservation on one group, or excluding any group. Striving for equity and fairness in program implementation, whether through well-thought-out pricing structures, availability of product and behavioral incentives, or access to educational materials and classes will help to remove barriers to participation, improve program reach, and avoid unintended consequences that limit access or unfairly shift the burden of conservation. In addressing these variables, conservation programming can: • Improve affordability for customers; • Enhance customer relationships; • Respond to environmental justice concerns; • Manage risk and uncertainty of water supplies; • Achieve enhanced water efficiency; • Decrease costs by reducing opportunity costs; and • Reduce water utility revenue losses. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-5 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.4 W ATER C ONSERVATION P ROGRAMS , P RACTICES , AND M EASURES Water conservation is a critical component of water resource management and should not be viewed as a temporary measure or as a public relations tool. Effective water conservation can sustain and extend water supplies; alleviate infrastructure capacity issues; mitigate impacts to supply and demand due to weather and climate variability; address affordability; and foster a sense of community-shared stewardship. To achieve this, conservation programming needs to provide the necessary tools to achieve and sustain these effects, and therefore, needs to fully address the how, who, when, and where of water use. At the core of this conservation plan are the programs, practices, and measures supported and funded through the water conservation program. For conservation programming to achieve and sustain the necessary water use reductions, it needs to address the diverse nature of water use within the service area. To ensure programming reflects the complexity of the water infrastructure and the diversity of end users, practices have been organized into five program focuses: Outreach, Economics, Utility Operations, Law and Policy, and Research and Metrics. Within each of these programs is a selection of practices and measures that meet the criteria identified on page 4.2. Some, like lawn watering guides and Water Check, have been active since the conservation program was created in June 2001. Other practices, such as WaterMAPS™, the CII analytics tool, and SLC TurfTrade are more recent and still evolving. There are also practices new to the program planned for the coming years, including landscape assessments and elementary school curricula. Though the practices are varied, they all meet some, if not all the criteria of providing targeted, meaningful, and equitable programing that will facilitate meeting and sustaining short- and long-term water conservation goals. 4.4.1 PROGRAMS The water conservation program is comprised of dozens of practices and measures organized into one of five programs: Outreach. Education, information, and community engagement are how we inform and encourage the adoption of practices, behaviors, and technologies that reduce water use and water waste. Sometimes considered “soft” practices, due in part to the difficulty of isolating and quantifying practice outcomes and effectiveness, none the less, these practices are typically simple to enact and have limited barriers to customer participation. This program focuses on conveying information and engaging in community dialogue that facilitates the meeting of conservation goals. And though difficult to measure, they are informed by the outcomes of the Research & Metrics program and so are based in actionable science. Economic. The price of water is an important mechanism through which to convey the value of water. Though, to clarify, it is not merely the rate at which water is charged, but also the other information that is conveyed in a water bill. Even more fundamentally, that meters are read, and bills are generated and SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-6 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR provided in a timely manner also help to inform the customer and convey the value of this limited resource. There are other ways, too, that economics can play a role in water conservation. Illustrating avoided costs can also be an incentive to reduce water use, whether it is the avoided costs associated with water use in a higher tier, or the avoided costs of not having to develop new sources of water. More direct incentives, in the form of rebates, can also help to reduce water use and offer the added benefit of potentially providing measurable outcomes. Utility Operations. To be a leader in water conservation, it is not enough to have a plan, but to integrate that plan into daily operations, maintenance, and capital programs. This program focuses on identifying and implementing opportunities to integrate conservation best practices into all aspects of department functions. From landscape management to construction of stormwater wetlands and street-side biofiltration; water supply planning to distribution system operations, conservation can and does support broader Department functions. Law & Policy. Salt Lake City has landscape code provisions that proactively encourage the implementation of best practices in landscapes; periodic review of these provisions ensures that the City continues to meet the inten tion of these provisions. Currently lacking are codes that clearly state water use prohibitions. Though codes exist that allow the regulation of water use, the codes as currently written do not clearly address water waste, so review will facilitate addressing this lack. There are also codes that support a variety of planning processes, including conservation and drought planning. City policy can also support conservation efforts by addressing the adoption of actions internally to City departments and divisions which support conservation. Ongoing review of City codes and policies that support conservation is an iterative process that is most successful when other City stakeholders are engaged in partnership, as demonstrated in the City’s participation of Growi ng Water Smart, which still brings together Planning, Utility, and other City staff to more fully integrate water and planning. Research and Metrics. Fundamental to the implementation and effectiveness of conservation programming is the adoption of programs that provide the necessary outcomes. Science, research, and analytics are at the core of conservation programming, ensuring that all other programs and practices have a basis in knowledge, research, and science. 4.4.2 PRACTICES AND MEASURES Within each program is a selection of practices and measures designed to facilitate the achievement of short- and long-term water conservation goals. These practices and measures are directed at specific end users to address various types of water use. They are designed to be implemented alone or in combination and all meet one or more of the identified criteria. For practice and measure details, see the corresponding practice tables. 4.4.3 PROGRAM TABLES Each practice and measure are listed in one of the following tables (Tables 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6), with select practices receiving more detailed coverage in section focuses. Within the tables, practices are generally described by title, target audience, practice timeline, project cost, metric or measurement, and partnership. Number (No.). Each practice is assigned a number within its program. This is useful when identifying practices relevant to specific documents, grant applications, and similar circumstances where space constraints limit the full title of description of a practice. Practice Title. The name of the practice, which is sometimes broadly descriptive, as in the case of “Brochures,” and sometimes specific to a single practice, such as “WaterMAPS™” customer reports. Effort has been made to keep the names descriptive and brief. Classification. Not all practices are for every customer. This column organizes and identifies practices by classification. These classifications correspond to the classifications described and used throughout this plan. They include Residential (Res), Industrial (Ind), Commercial (Com), and Institutional (Inst). (See Figure 2 - 2). Brief Description. Generally, an expansion on the practice title or a broader, though short, description. Practice Timeline. Timeline details may range from a single event, for instance, the development of a study or plan, to ongoing practices such as meter replacement or monthly billing. “Active” column indicators include “√’ (Active), “ID” (In Development), TBD (To Be Determined), or NA (Not Applicable or Not Active). Implementation indicates when the practice was active or is planned to be active. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-7 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Cost/Funding. Costs mostly reflect current budget allocations or future planned allocation estimates. Costs over the practice lifetime have not been calculated, unless noted. In some cases, funding has been provided in the form of grants, memorandum of understanding, or as a component of partnership, which have been noted accordingly. The development of recommended five- and ten-year budgets is a component of the Research and Metrics program and is currently underway. Reach/Metrics. Measuring practice effectiveness helps determine if resources (staff time or budget) are being allocated in a manner that supports program goals or allocated sufficiently to ensure practice success. Some of these measures are soft, such as the number of visitors to a garden, brochures mailed, website visits; some are hard, as in the number of Water Checks performed, metered water use reduction, or commercial audits completed. Not all programs should be measured by the same metric; for one thing, that isn’t practical or pragmatic. A demonstration garden may serve multiple purposes but how do you measure how much water has been saved due to its existence? How much water is saved when schoolrooms are visited, or when phone calls are answered? This is where the measurement of reach helps to inform practice evaluation: how many visitors, how many classrooms, how many brochures. These practices bring value, even if the measure of success is knowing the reach, as they have value in the relationships built, the assistance provided, and opportunity for inspiration. Partnerships. The Utility has been fully vested in conservation programing for decades. And while Utility staff have accomplished a great deal towards implementing conservation programs, partnerships have been instrumental to the ongoing success and will continue in importance as work towards achieving current and future water use reduction goals continues. Some partnerships are more singular and tied to specific practices, such as the contract with Utah State University Climate Center to operate and maintain research quality weather stations within our service area. Other partnerships revolve around funding, particularly grants, as is the case of drought planning and the Bureau of Reclamation. Other partnerships are ongoing, such as the work with CUWCD and DWRe pertaining to CII studies. Some partnerships, such as the one with Utah State University (USU), have relevance beyond the scope of specific practices, informing conservation efforts across the reach of programing and providing invaluable collaboration. However, th e most valued partner is the community; the people, businesses, industry, and institutions served who do the work of saving water every day. Savings. Ideally, every conservation practice or measure has demonstrable water savings. This is, however, difficult to assess for most practices. Improvements in metering technology and the integration of GIS/IT technologies in conservation programing will improve this moving ahead. In the meantime, where possible, historical and projected water savings have been provided. Not every practice can be described with all these details, but every effort has been made to provide as much detail as possible within these pages. Where details are either not available or not relevant, it has been so indicated. For instance, some programs have no direct cost, such as developing internal City department conservation plans. In other cases, practice metrics may be difficult to determine; how, for instance, do we measure the impact of a garden or brochure? Within each program there are summaries of select practices and measures, intended to offer more detail, including timeline, budget, and desired outcomes. These select practices represent current and proposed programming that is reflective of short- and long-term conservation goals, as well as the needs and interests of water customers across all classifications. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-8 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.5 O UTREACH Education and public outreach are a necessary component of successful conservation programing. Though the types of programing vary, they share the common attributes of informing and educating customers of the needs and benefits of conservation; the risks to the community and environment in not conserving; and actions to take to achieve water conservation goals. Outreach initiatives are characterized as being customer-focused, low-input programs with an emphasis on education and information to motivate changes by either adopting or abandoning general or specific practices. These initiatives are thought of as “soft programs,” in that they depend on behavioral changes and not changes to fixtures or infrastructure. Programs can generally be organized by those designed to change behavior or to encourage the adoption of new methodologies and techniques. Outreach also includes education and messaging campaigns, designed to provide actionable, proven techniques and methods for reducing water use. Such campaigns include “Never Waste,” “Rain On/Sprinklers Off,” and “7 Gallon Challenge,” to name a few. And while actual water savings may be difficult to measure, metrics of site visits, shares, and “likes” helps us know if the messaging is on track. Outreach practices also create opportunities for reciprocal, iterative dialogue, leading to community engagement and acceptance, critical for program success and the achievement of short- and long-term conservation goals. It is in classroom settings, community gatherings, and social media that we, as practitioners, can hear and learn from the customers for whom these programs are designed, to make programming accessible, meaningful, and actionable. Outreach isn’t “just talk.” The Water Check program provides site-specific guidance to assist property managers or homeowners in improving irrigation efficiency. WaterMAPSTM delivers relatable and actionable information to property owners to enhance understanding of the relationship between landscape characteristics and water need. Providing actionable information commercial, industrial, and institutional customers will enhan ce engagement by those sectors in conservation efforts and deliver meaningful resul ts in demand reduction. Residential leak detection programs inform homeowners of indoor water loss, while delivering messages of the importance of managing all water use and waste. Learning labs offer education, advice, and guidance in improving landscape practices, leak detection and repair, and other areas of conservation. The following are details of select conservation programs which reflect short- and long- term goals as outlined in Chapter 3 and address community feedback on existing programming. FIVE -YEAR FOCUS Outreach Programs •Demonstration Gardens and slcgardenwise.com •Public Access Cloud -based Portals •Learning Labs •School Programs •Water Week SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-9 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.5.1 DEMONSTRATION GARDENS AND SLCGARDENWISE.COM [0-3, 0-4, 0-5] Timeline: 2005 to present 2025 Budget: $14,500 Partners: TBD Reach: Across all customer classifications Savings/Metric: Number of visitors; events While it may be difficult to measure the worth of public gardens, water conservation gardens bring value to conservation programming as well as to the neighborhoods where gardens reside. Offering information, education, and inspiration of best practices in landscaping methods and plant selection, demonstration gardens provide self-directed as well as led experiences. These spaces also create opportunities for volunteering, bringing value to the program and making learning a hands-on experience. Demonstration gardens also create opportunities to bring value to neighborhoods by providing beautiful and sustainably managed landscapes to enjoy and inspire. For example, the 900 South Stormwater Wetland and Demonstration Garden is located along a former storm drain ditch and abandoned railroad corridor. The conversion of this space into a stormwater wetland and conservation demonstration garden created multiple values for the City and the neighborhood. The Greater Avenues Conservation Garden sits on what was once an abandoned lot in the Avenues neighborhood. Its location adjacent to urban -wildland interface areas presented an opportunity to demonstrate not only water -wise techniques, but also how site sensitive landscaping can support wildlife and community aesthetic values. And lest there is concern that a formerly un - watered site is now receiving previously undelivered resources; Greater Avenues Garden has not been irrigated since 2015. As enjoyable as actual demonstration gardens can be, weather or other impediments may discourage visitors. Learning opportunities may also be limited as it is impossible to include every plant or incorporate multiple design concepts. Slcgardenwise.com provides an alternative visitor experience, offering examples of water-wise gardens from throughout the service area. Virtual tours, landscape solutions, and an extensive and locally developed plant database makes slcgardenwise the next best thing to actual garden tours. Future focus for the demonstration gardens and slcgardenwise is to upgrade landscape features and irrigation systems, update learning materials, and create on-site learning opportunities. www.SLCgardenwise is scheduled and budgeted for an update in the current fiscal year. This will include updated landscapes, expanded plant data base, and enhanced functionality. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-10 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.5.2 PUBLIC ACCESS, CLOUD-BASED PORTALS [0-17] Timeline: 2018 - current Budget: TBD Partners: Utah State University, EWIG Reach: Residential and CII customers Savings/Metrics: Number of visitors; change in individual and average LIR Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), Water Checks, WaterMAPS TM, and CII Analytics are providing data that not only informs conservation programming but offers opportunities to provide timely and action able information directly to water customers. Older methods of communicating information, such as brochures and even web-based communication, are giving way to up-to-the- moment, customer-targeted information via cloud-based communications applications. Water Checks, a well-established, proven program, has benefited from recent technological advances. With funds received through Extension Water Initiative Grants (EWIG), USU, conservation programming, and Department GIS/IT staff, Water Check reporting added cloud-based reporting, messaging, and mapping capabilities. Water Check participants now receive GIS-generated irrigation zone maps with site details, online reports, tips, and support via direct messaging. This portal will also support efforts to promote other conservation programing, as well as to facilitate pre-qualification and post-verification of program measure implementation, where appropriate. Homeowners are not the only customers with the capacity to conserve water in their landscapes. WaterMAPSTM, a USU-developed program, helps identify our capacity to conserve in the landscape. Getting this information to the customer requires a cloud-based communications system. Homeowners and landscapes are not the only customers with the capacity to conserve. Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional customers (CII) are also an important part of our water conservation strategy. While these customers’ water use profiles can be more complex than that of residential users, they have the same need for timely, meaningful, and actionable information. Improving the depth and range of information to CII customers will enhance engagement in conservation programing and increase opportunities to successfully achieve stated conservation goals. 4.5.3 CONSERVATION LEARNING LABS [0-14] Timeline: 2026 Budget: TBD Partners: USU/CWEL, UofU Lifelong Learning, EPA-WaterSense Reach: Residential Savings/Metric: Number of participants Research indicates that Utah residents, including those within the service area, believe in the need for, and are committed to water conservation. What is lacking is not the will, but the knowledge of the best, most effective ways to reduce water use. Homeowners want to know how best to water to support conservation while sustaining a landscape, such as: how to select plants, plan the landscape, or convert sprinklers to drip. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-11 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Homeowners also have questions about water efficiency indoors, and ask about toilets, the best way to wash dishes, and how to find and repair leaks? In short, customers have a lot of questions. We have answers. Improving access to solid, up-to-date information and strategies to help homeowners make sensible, sustainable choices will help achieve current and long-term water use reduction goals. Lectures, hands-on labs, and how-to webinars offer in-person and interactive opportunities to convey useful and relevant information. This program will focus on maximizing existing resources to deliver high -quality learning experiences focused on water conservation. Partnerships with USU/CWEL, University of Utah’s Lifelong Learning, and US-EPA WaterSense will ensure quality instruction and content. Conservation education must be an essential, if not always quantifiable, part of any conservation plan. As noted in the State of Utah Regional Water Conservation Goal Report25, “When projecting future water use and conservation potential, it is important to understand that water users’ choices regarding water use will be influenced by a complicated combination of factors…” Thus, even though specific water savings may not be directly attributable to a given conservation program or practice, conservation education and outreach through learning labs and other educational venues is a necessary component of the “combination of policies” that must be in place to motivate and facilitate the ultimate conservation actions. 25 Regional Water Conservation Goal Report, Hansen Allen & Luce and Bowen Collins & Associates, November 2019, p. 16 4.5.4 SCHOOL CLASSROOM PROGRAM [0-10] Timeline: curriculum developed 2022. Relaunch 2026 Budget: NA Partners: USU/CWEL, UofU Lifelong Learning, EPA-WaterSense, AWE Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: Number of events, participants Curriculum was developed in 2022 in partnership with Salt Lake School District 4th grade teachers to introduce water conservation concepts, values, and activities into a classroom setting. Program focus was on grades 4 and 9, to reflect state curriculum, with classroom events occurring that fall and into 2023. With planned increase in conservation staff, this program has a planned relaunch in 2026. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-12 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.5.5 WATER WEEK AND OTHER EVENTS [O-10, O-18] Timeline: On-going. Budget: TBD Partners: USU/CWEL, UofU Lifelong Learning, EPA-WaterSense, AWE Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: Number of participants, partners, and related events In 2007, the State of Utah adopted the first full week in May as State Water Week, thanks to the efforts of the conservation staff and then-legislator Ralph Becker. Though inspired by American Water Works Association Water Week, the event expanded on that concept to include stormwater, waste water, watershed, and water conservation topics along with culinary water. Using art, film, poetry, and even dance to convey the complexity, value, and beauty of all things related to water, the goal of Water Week is to foster a deeper understanding and build stewardship of this incredibly critical resource. The success of this effort is reflected in the number of water agencies across the state that celebrate Water Week with tours, library readings, and other events. In the coming years, the conservation program will re -focus energy to promoting Water Week, as well as other nationally and internationally recognized water - related events, such as Fix-a-Leak Week, Global Water Week, and a Day Without Water. These events are also incorporated into the classroom program and general conservation messaging. 4.5.6 CONSERVATION ACTION PLANS [O-9, U-6] Timeline: On-going. Budget: NA Partners: Internal and external stakeholders; CII customers Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: Water savings with implementation; Number of plans Though this plan is comprehensive, covering the entire Utility service area, it cannot address every opportunity or circumstance of how and where water efficiencies can take place. With that in mind, the conservation team is working directly with internal and external stakeholders, as well as with CII customers, to formulate and implement customer-specific conservation action plans. These plans will include 2 to 5 actionable and measurable goals, timelines for implementation (not to exceed five years), metrics, and an on-site team. Action plans have been completed by SLC Sustainability and SL County Sustainability, with plans in process from SLC Parks, SLC Golf, and SLC Facilities. Completed plans can be found in Appendix P. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-13 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-2 OUTREACH No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected O-1 Brochures √ √ √ √ Develop and distribute brochures relating to water conservation and best practices TBD 2001 - ongoing $14,000 per mailing/service area Quantities mailed. Spikes in visits to related websites NA NA NA O-2 Water Stewardship Calendar √ √ √ 12-month calendar with information and tips covering a variety of water issues. TBD 2007 - 2020 $30,000 for 25,000 copies. Distributed to SLC schools, SL City and County Libraries NA NA NA 0-3 Demonstration Gardens √ √ √ √ Design and install demonstration gardens throughout service area C varied NA TBD NA NA 0-4 SLCTV 17 GardenWise √ √ √ √ Develop and distribute water conservation- focused programming for SLC TV17 C 2001 - 2014 NC Site visits and other web metrics SLC-IMS NA NA O-5 SLC Gardenwise: Virtual Water Conservation Garden tours √ √ √ √ Develop virtual garden tours on web site, include plant data bases, design tips, watering/maintena nce guidance. Incorporates several past program initiatives. √ 6/2014 (SLC Gardenwise) $25,000 for site upgrade. $2,500 for licensing. Site visits Initially partially funded through a Bureau of Reclamation grant NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined – C - Completed SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-14 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-2 OUTREACH No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected O-6 Water Check √ √ √ √ Promote and conduct lawn sprinkler check-ups for residential, commercial, and institutional properties √ (S) Estab. 1988; Partnered with USU 2007. Ongoing. $60,000 provided by MWDSLS annually. SLCDPU one- time funding of additional components, including APP, portal, and GIS capability ($22,000) Map and track use. MWDSL&S 557 AF 47,000 gallons per residential participant annually O-7 SLC Landscape BMPs: Design, Planting and Maintenance Guide √ √ √ √ Develop guide to support best practices in landscape design, implementation, and maintenance to support conservation, stormwater protection, and riparian corridor health. C 10/1/2011 (see E-8) Part of in-kind contribution for BoR Grant TBD SLC Code Enforcement; Northern Colorado Water District; Green Industries of Colorado (GreenCO); UNLA NA NA O-8 Commercial and Industrial Certification √ Develop and implement a water- wise certification program for commercial and institutional water customers ID TBD, in conjunction with CII Tool and CII audits/direct installs TBA Audit and track use of participants TBA NA NA O-9 Conservation Action Plans √ √ Encourage and publish water conservation plans √ In Process NC Track achievements and water use reductions NA NA TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined – C - Completed SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-15 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-2 OUTREACH No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected O-10 Classroom Programs √ Develop package programs and activities to facilitate classroom learning focused on water conservation ID 2026 TBD Track classroom visits and students TBD NA NA O-11 Landscape Assessment and Check-ups √ Provide residential landscape assessments to enhance water efficiencies ID Some landscape assessment is included in Water Check. Expansion contingent on staff capacity. TBD Map and track use TBA NA TBD O-12 Private Garden Project √ √ √ √ Promote institutional, commercial, and residential properties to be water-wise demonstrations ID Dependent on staff capacity TBD. Cost may involve media outreach, yard signs, and other support materials. Map with public access TBD NA NA O-13 Residential Leak Detection and Repair √ Provide low or no- cost leak detection and repair to qualifying households ID TBD TBD Map and track use TBD NA Ave. 490 gallons/ person/ year 480 AF/year for utility O-14 Learning Labs √ √ √ √ Workshops on water conservation techniques and strategies √ Intended start date of 2020; canceled due to Covid-19 outbreak. To be resumed contingent on staff capacity. TBD Track participation rates TBD NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined – C - Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-16 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-2 OUTREACH No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected O-15 CitySourced App √ √ √ √ Mobile app allowing users to submit notifications of observed water waste and other water issues √ Ongoing NC - Program supported thru GIS/IT functions Track number of reported incidents. NA NA NA O-16 WaterMAPS™ √ √ √ √ Outreach focused on WaterMAPSTM outcomes √ Development began in 2018. Public launch June 2023. $100,000 Customer response; target survey; track use USU/CWEL; EWIG grant NA TBD O-17 Cloud-based Public Portals √ √ √ √ Provide cloud- based, secure access of water use analytics to customers across sectors ID In development TBD Visitors; customer response TBD NA NA O-18 Water Week and other Events √ √ √ √ Utilize recognized events to promote understanding and foster stewardship √ 2011 - Ongoing $ Participant levels TBD NA NA O-19 Strategic Communications Plan √ √ √ √ √ 9/2025 $50,000 NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined – C - Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-17 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.6 E CONOMICS Economic initiatives are focused on pricing, rebates, and other programs that offer financial incentives to customer participation or offer services that provide economic value to customers. These programs encourage changes in behavior or upgrades to fixtures, while generating opportunities to measure program effectiveness by monitoring and analyzing water use pre- and post-product or fixture installation, or before and after changes in pricing signals. The targeted nature of these programs will also assist in the challenges of meeting specific, short- and long-term conservation goals. Financial incentives may either be built around avoided costs, such as inclining tiered rates leading to larger bills for more water use; or they may encourage improvements to landscapes or indoor fixtures through product or service discounts or rebates. All conservation incentives should be designed and implemented in such a way as to help to achieve water use reduction goals in a manner that is transparent, cost-effective, and fair, all while ensuring that such programs do not place any undue burdens or create unintended costs for some customers. When creating programs with financial incentives, there are several key issues to keep in mind, whether the signal is a carrot or a stick. If using pricing signals, they need to reflect the cost of water and all that it takes to acquire, treat, and deliver that water; the structure should provide some level of revenue stability; and rates should be fairly and equitably set so as to encourage appropriate use while also making essential water affordable. It is important to note that billing messages may be as important as the bill itself in driving and reducing demand. Rebates and cost-sharing may help reduce water use by encouraging customers to use improved technologies, install better fixtures, renovate landscapes, or otherwise change behavior. As with pricing signals, product or service rebates and cost-shares should provide incentives for a range of customer classifications, help achieve meaningful and sustainable use reductions, demonstrate measurable outcomes, and be equitable. According to a recent Alliance for Water Efficiency (AWE) study, the most effective and efficacious rebate programs are targeted to specific user classifications or uses (residential or commercial, indoor or outdoor); and have clearly stated pre-qualifications and post-evaluation components. This is to ensure that the rebate provided achieves the desired goal for both customer and utility. When used appropriately, incentive pricing and rebates can be highly targeted tools for achieving short- and long-term water use reductions goals while providing value and benefits to customers. FIVE -YEAR FOCUS Economic Programs •CII Audits and Direct -Installs •Rebates, Microgrants, and Other Incentives SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-18 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.6.1 REBATES, MICRO-GRANTS, AND INCENTIVES [E-4, E-6, E-7, E-8] Timeline: TBD Budget: TBD Partners: TBD Reach: Residential Savings/Metric: Acres altered; meter-use comparisons. NOTE: this metric only considers know participants in programs and does not include reductions in water use derived from non-participant landscape transformations. Customers within the service area have done a remarkable job reducing water use. Since 2001 and the beginning of the water conservation program, total water use has reduced nearly 28%, and residential household use has reduced by 29%. As good as these numbers are, there is still more to do as indicated in the Water Supply and Demand Study. To sustain future supplies and live within our water means, residential water users will need to reduce an additional 14% indoors, and as much as a third of our outdoor use. Up to now, conservation has been achieved primarily through voluntary actions as home and property owners adopt better practices or make improvements to homes and landscapes. To meet new water conservation goals and to support homeowners in their efforts, a series of pilot rebate programs have been proposed. Irrigation spray heads, rain sensors, lawn trades, and low-flow fixtures are being considered. Additionally, this program will also work to increase consumer awareness of existing rebates available through partnership with Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD). Recently published studies by the AWE indicate that program success depends on proper customer vetting, prequalification, and post -engagement verification. WaterMAPSTM and Water Check programs are well suited to provide the necessary quality control measures to ensure rebate program effectiveness. Not all customers have issues with outdoor watering, but rather, need to manage general use or bill amounts. Rebate programs focused on leak detection and repair, and fixture replacement will help qualifying households reduce water use and waste, and reduce their water bills, keeping essential indoor water use affordable. Directed at both indoor and outdoor water use, these programs should help customers achieve greater levels of efficiency and reduce waste. Following water use of participating households will provide greater insight into residential water use patterns, which will inform future programs, and building relationships within the community will further enhance conservation efforts. 4.6.2 CII AUDITS AND DIRECT INSTALLS [E-10] Timeline: 2020 Budget: Phase I $95,000 Partners: CUWCD Reach: CII Savings: TBD Though conservation practices have historically focused on outdoor single- family residential water use, that use reflects roughly one-fourth of all use. Though comprising only 12 percent of water connections, CII water use (both indoors and out) accounts for more than half of all metered water sales. With this in mind, programing in the CII sector has increased to include enhanced analytics, identification of sector-specific water use standards, and establishment of preliminary water use reduction goals. One way to assist select CII customers in reducing water use is to identify inefficient practices or fixtures and to incentivize changes. This project proposes audits of select CII accounts including assessment of water use records and trends, review of standard practices, and inventory and measurement audits of appliances and fixtures. Phase I of this project will focus on small hotels and motels, restaurants, and public and assisted housing. Sites have been selected through water use analytics, identifying properties that show higher than average water use within each sector. After conducting initial assessments, recommendations will be made for fixture, appliance, and practice changes. Some fixture and appliance practices may provide incentives or rebates through matched funding. Besides directly assisting participating CII customers in reducing water waste and overall water use, this project will provide invaluable data regarding common practices within specific CII sectors, as well as building relationships between CII customers and conservation program staff. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-19 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-3 ECONOMICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected E-1 Irrigation Meters and Budgets √ √ √ √ Establish budgets for accounts with dedicated irrigation- only meters √ 2003-Current NA Map and track use. Map eligible sites not currently using irrigation meters; chart potential savings/budget impacts NA NA NA E-2 Rate Structuring √ √ √ √ Utilize a rate structure to encourage responsible use of water √ Periodic NA Track water use through various tiers over time. NA NA NA E-3 Volumetric and loading Sewer Charge √ √ √ √ Base sewer rates on metered winter water usage √ Periodic TBD Track use and discharge over time NA NA TBD E-4 Rebate: Irrigation Rain Sensors √ √ √ √ Incentivize installation of irrigation rain sensors through rebates ID TBD TBD Pre-quality/verify through Water Check; Map locations; track/compare use TBD NA TBD E-5 Rain barrels √ Provide for purchase rain barrels to homeowners √ 2015-Current Potentially no cost to Utility dependent on selected vendor Map barrel locations. Track water use. Can we identify locations of barrels purchased elsewhere? NA TBD TBD E-6 Rebate: HE Irrigation Spray Heads √ √ Incentivize installation of high- efficiency irrigation spray heads through rebates ID TBD TBD Pre-quality/verify through Water Check; Map locations; track/compare use USU Water Check NA TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-20 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-3 ECONOMICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected E-7 Turf Trades √ √ √ √ Incentivize utilization of low-water, low- input turf grasses, either as seed or sod, in new landscape or as retrofits. √ 2022 – current Program is direct funded by program participants Track participant water use USU/CWEL and TWCA TBD 2.3 AF per acre of turf conversion E-8 Rebate: Pressure Regulators √ Incentivize installation of pressure regulation devises to improve indoor and outdoor efficiency and enhance product/appliance wear. ID TBD TBD Track water use TBD NA TBD E-9 Residential Leak Detection and Repair √ √ Provide low or no- cost leak detection and repair to qualifying households; fixture replacement. ID TBD TBD Map and track use TBD NA 490 gallons/ person/ year 480 AF/year for utility E-10 CII Audits and direct installs √ Conduct audits and provide direct- installs on select CII properties. 2023 focus on City properties. ID 2022 - Current Pilot: $200,000 Track water use $50,000 NA TBD E-11 Rebate: Landscape Transform- ation √ √ √ √ √ 2020 – Current NC Acreage converted; metered-use analysis CUWCD TBD TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-21 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.7 U TILITY O PERATIONS The City is committed to be a leader in water conservation. With that in mind, these initiatives represent adopted actions and practices that will help ensure infrastructure is built and maintained in a manner which optimizes water efficiency, minimizes or eliminates waste, and demonstrates best practices. Salt Lake City has been fully metered since the 1920s, making it one of the earliest and longest running metered water systems in the Western United States. Historically, meters have been read monthly (or more technically, each meter is read roughly every 28 to 31 days), and from those readings’ bills are generated and mailed. Until recently, meter technology has not changed a great deal; Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) profoundly changes both when and the how of meter reading. Utilizing long-range radio systems, AMIs record and report water use more accurately and with much greater frequency than has been possible. Utilizing this new technology, water use can be monitored in increments as small as 15-minute intervals. Work has begun to replace all meters (roughly 92,000) with AMIs. Outdoor water use, specifically, landscape water use and waste, is an important component of managing and reducing our water footprint. While it may seem that conservation and landscape programs focus on single-family residential customers, every landscape can be more efficient. Last year, a comprehensive audit of Department landscaped properties was conducted, with the intent to develop a strategy to increase outdoor water use efficiency. This program aims to reduce water use and greenhouse gas emissions while demonstrating best practices. The Residential End Uses of Water26 estimated that an average of 12 percent of residential indoor water use is lost to leaks. This water loss can account for as much as 10,000 gallons per year. Imagine then, how much water is lost within an entire water system. According to the Salt Lake City Supply and Demand Master Plan, water loss within the water infrastructure system is estimated to be between 10 to 12 percent, an amount over 11,000 AF of water annually. Implementation is planned for conducting water system audit modeled after 26Footnote: DeOreo, William, Peter Mayer, Benedykt Dziegielewski, Jack Kiefer. Residential End Uses of Water 2016. Water research foundation. Denver, Co AWWA-M36 methodologies to identify the volume of water loss, determine what proportion of this water is apparent or real loss, and identify appropriate steps and practices to address this loss. FIVE -YEAR FOCUS Utility Programs •Evaluate Data -Mining Opportunities of AMI Technologies •Landscape Upgrades and Maintenance •Implement M36 Findings •Implement City -Wide Water Efficiency Study Findings SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-22 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.7.1 EVALUATE DATA-MINING OPPORTUNITIES OF AMI TECHNOLOGIES [U-7, U-9] Timeline: TBD Budget: TBD Partners: NA Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: Efficacy of data extraction Utilization of water meters, coupled with regular readings and billing statements, helps to manage water supplies and convey specific and critical information to water users. Water users can then use this information to make good decisions regarding future water use. Since the 1920’s, water use has been metered, read, and billed throughout the service area. Outside of the computerization of meter and billing data functions, this practice has seen little change over its history. Though this process might have been adequate, it did present shortcomings for conservation programming. Receiving regular meter billing data helps inform customers, but it is a snapshot of past behavior and lacks immediacy. The development of advanced metering infrastructure technologies (AMI) has revolutionized this process. Currently, residential and CII mechanical meters are being replaced with AMI technology. This will provide daily information to water managers and water customers, enhancing resource management response and improving customer understanding of water use. AMI technologies are providing live-time water use data, improving leak detection, and enhancing understanding of water use patterns, all of which is informing current and future water conservation programs. A better understanding of the data available and how to use that data will enhance technology impacts. 4.7.2 LANDSCAPE UPGRADES AND MAINTENANCE [U-2, U-10, U-11] Timeline: 2020 to current Budget: $100,000 (proposed annually) Partners: NA Reach: Utility-wide Savings: 480 AF/year for upgrades to City properties including Parks and Golf properties Approximately 55 percent of water use within the service area is used to maintain landscapes, and landscape and irrigation design, installation, and maintenance affect water use. Improving site management helps to reduce water waste. With this in mind, a comprehensive practice has been established for landscape and irrigation design and management that addresses existing properties and to-be-developed properties. For newly developed properties, staff engineers and consultants work with water conservation staff on site design, ensuring that best practices are followed, and new landscapes are efficient, sustainable, and attractive. Existing properties are also a component of this program. Properties have been catalogued and are being evaluated for irrigation and landscape characteristics, maintenance histories, as well as water use. After completing the WaterMAPS™ assessments, landscapes will be classified and prioritized for improvements, including irrigation and landscape improvements. In the meantime, water conservation staff are working closely with the stormwater and distribution divisions to enhance site management, ensuring reduction in water use and other inputs. Additional to proposed and planned landscape upgrades, conservation and stormwater staff are collaborating to develop specifications and guidelines for implementation of biofiltration and other Low Impact Design (LID) infrastructure. The purpose will be to facilitate the construction of biofiltration retention and other green infrastructure in order to improve and protect stormwater quality. The synergistic collaboration between stormwater and conservation programing will ensure that future LIDs support both stormwater and conservation goals. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-23 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.7.3 LEAK DETECTION AND M36 AUDIT OUTCOMES [U-3] Timeline: Ongoing Budget: TBD Partners: NA Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: 1,450 AF/year This assumes that system losses can be reduced from 12% to 9% (see R-19) and that 50 percent of the saved system losses come from leak detection and repair. Public Utilities began its leak detection program in 2005 with the purchase of one correlator. Currently we have 2 full-time employees, 2 correlators, and 10 portable loggers dedicated to leak detection. The program pinpoints leaks that are surfacing away from the actual break, helping crews to identify and locate leaks more quickly. We also use a machine learning model to predict the likelihood of failure to determine the best areas to survey. We are hoping to enhance the program with new technology such as AI, more loggers, satellite, and ground penetrating radar. In 2025, the Utility completed the AWWA M36 water audit, a robust top-down evaluation to identify and address non-revenue water. Over the next five years, the Utility will develop a strategy for evaluating and, as feasible, implementing the findings of that study. Additionally, now that the baseline has been set, the conservation office will update the findings annually 4.7.4 CITY-WIDE WATER EFFICIENCY STUDY [U-2, O-7] Timeline: 2023 - ongoing Budget: TBD Partners: Maddaus Water Management, USU/CWEL/ CUWCD, DWRe, Salt Lake County Reach: City properties Savings/Metric: At least 5 MG annually In 2023, with support from the Utility director, Laura Briefer, Mayor Mendenhall requested the Utility to expand its CII analysis project to focus on City-owned and operated properties. An existing contract with Maddaus Water Management Inc. was amended, and over the next six months, an extensive analysis of City properties was implemented. Assistance in conducting CII audits was provided by Central Utah Water Conservancy District and Utah State Division of Water Resources staff. The project involved evaluating water use through 757 meters, conducting Water Checks at 16 sites, applying WaterMAPS™ to 68 properties, and conducting 14 indoor audits. The report was submitted to the Mayor’s Office December 2023. Findings included: • Identifying 350,000 square feet of un-utilized turf; • Irrigation system issues; • Leaking water-cooled HVAC systems; • Leaking or poorly operating toilets and faucets; and • Large vehicle wash-station hose issues. Some actions have already been taken, including replacing a cooling tower with a high-efficiency air-cooled unit. Bathroom fixture repairs began upon identification, and irrigation system maintenance addressed the following irrigation season. An estimated 5 million gallons of water could be saved annually by addressing the findings in the report; the conservation office is currently working with other city departments on implementation plans and funding mechanisms. (See https://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/2023CityWaterEfficiencyReport.pdf.) SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-24 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-4 UTILITY OPERATIONS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected U-1 Customer Use Change Notification √ √ √ √ Notify customers when water usage exceeds winter usage by 20 percent. √ Currently only applied to commercial and industrial customers. NA Map. Compare addresses to home age, frequency of notification. Can we reduce this number? NA NA TBD U-2 Landscape Upgrades √ Inventory and assess Utility properties for water efficiencies and make necessary upgrades. √ Recommendations of practice scope to be derived from updated Supply and Demand Study, and WaterMAPSTM Analysis. Varies Map utility locations, water usage. Assess landscape change potential, ROI. NA NA 480 AF/year (Including Parks and Golf) U-3 Leak Detection and Repair √ Implement program to ensure enhanced distribution system efficiencies; identify and repair system leaks in a timely manner. √ Utility completed AWWA M36 Assessment in 2003. NA Mapped through CityWorks. NA NA 1,450 AF/year U-4 Monthly meter reading and billing √ √ √ √ Provide timely and accurate information to customer to increase awareness of water use. √ 1928 NA Track use NA NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C - Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-25 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-4 UTILITY OPERATIONS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected U-5 Public Utility Advisory Committee √ Standing citizen committee to advise in conservation policy and programming. √ 1930’s NA Board support and engagement in programing. NA NA NA U-6 SLC Dept/Div Conservation and Drought Plans √ Encourage and publish water conservation plans from City Departments and Divisions. √ Some completed as part of 2014 Water Conservation Master Plan Update; planned for 2019 WCMP update. 2019: $75,000 + in-kind match Track response and use levels during drought per drought plan guidelines. 2019 Update funded through Bureau of Reclamation Grant for $75,000 NA NA U-7 Universal metering and meter replacement √ √ √ √ Each account is metered and meter replacement program in place. √ 2000s Cost Varies Map meter replacement locations? Map different types of meters? Measure pre/post change usage. NA 900 AF for every 1% of lost accuracy recovered 900 AF for every 1% of lost accuracy recovered U-8 Water Re-use Study √ Study feasibility of water re-use pilot project. C Study completed in 2015 - See study outcome recommendati ons. NA NA NA U-9 Advanced Meter Technologies √ √ √ √ Adopt new technologies that allow for instant reading of meters while facilitating data analysis √ Utility implementing AMI installation for residential and CII customers. Cost Varies Map locations; meter use analysis. NA NA TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C - Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-26 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-4 UTILITY OPERATIONS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected U-10 Landscape Specifications √ √ Update landscape and irrigation specifications for inclusion in SLCPDU construction projects. ID 2020/21 TBD TBD NA NA NA U-11 Landscape Maintenance √ Implement BMPs for maintaining SLCDPU properties to enhance conservation and sustainability. √ Contract implemented 2019 Varies Track water use on sites. NA NA NA U-12 EPA WaterSense Partnership √ Become a partner in EPA WaterSense. √ 2025 NA NA US-EPA NA NA U-13 AWWA/AWE Program Certification √ Submit documentation for review and scoring of conservation program. √ 2026 NA NA AWWA, AWE NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C - Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-27 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.8 L AW AND P OLICY Since the inception of the conservation program, the City has depended predominantly on volunteer engagement to achieve its water use reduction goals. There are examples of ordinances and policies that support conservation, including landscape codes and the billing rate structure. In order to achieve the next level of goals, there are ordinances and policies that would support further conservation by codifying some best practices and addressing egregious water waste. 4.8.1 EVALUATE ORDINANCES AND POLICIES [LP-4, LP-7, LP-8] Timeline: Ongoing Budget: NA Partners: NA Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: TBD Squandered Water Ordinance [LP-8] Even before the creation of the water conservation program, water customers acted promptly and appropriately to calls for temporary reductions in water use. As a result of this long history, the conservation program has come to depend on this volunteer spirit to facilitate our initial water use reductions. However, after nearly twenty years, not everyone is part of the solution. Usually, when asked to change or correct a behavior, requests are positively received; sometimes they are not. Sometimes, property owners insist on watering daily; an absentee owner won’t repair a leaking swamp cooler; or a remote corporate office isn’t concerned with the broken and geysering spray head at a grocery store, miles, or states away. This disregard for a limited and valued resource is the definition of squandering and is why it may be time to consider such an ordinance. FIVE -YEAR FOCUS Law & Policy Programs •Evaluate Ordinances and Policies o Squandered Water o Clarification of Irrigation - Only Meter Ordinance o Evaluation of Irrigation Only Budgets o Review Existing Landscape Ordinances SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-28 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Clarification of Irrigation-only Meter Ordinance In 2003, a seasonal tiered rate structure was adopted as a means to enhance the message of the value of water and to ensure that those who use the most water pay the most for that water. Along with establishing rates for residential and CII customers, irrigation-only meter accounts were also established. These meters are intended to service outdoor water use during irrigation season months. Each account receives site-specific, monthly water budgets based on landscapeable area and modified evapotranspiration equations. Staying in budget means water is charged in the second tier, identified as reasonable outdoor use. Occasionally, a property owner or manager doesn’t turn off their irrigation system and the irrigation-only meter continues to be used. Owing to v ague language in the rate ordinance, this un-authorized winter use of irrigation-only meters has been billed in the first tier, as is all other winter water use. Evaluation of Irrigation-only Meter Budgets [LP-12] As mentioned above, irrigation-only meters and budgets were established in 2003 to encourage responsible outdoor water use while maintaining landscape health, support efforts to sustain water supplies for necessary and beneficial uses, and to help achieve both overall water use reduction as well as reduction of peak water demand. These budgets, developed in conjunction with Utah State University Plants, Soils, and Climate Department, consider irrigated areas, reference evapotranspiration, and irrigation efficiencies of 60 percent. Since then, through continued research, understanding of actual turf water need has grown, and adequate science exists to indicate that it is time to review and reassess these budgets. Additionally, better technology helps deliver water more efficiently. Given the new goals as outlined in the Water Supply and Demand Study and articulated in Chapter 3 of this plan, it is important to align irrigation-only budgets with current science and long-term outdoor water reduction goals. Review Existing Landscape Ordinances and Policies Salt Lake City Planning Department conducted a rigorous evaluation of landscape codes over the past several years, including Salt Lake City’s Code 21A.48.055: Water Efficient Landscaping, which establishes best practices to help reduce water waste in landscapes and park strips. This evaluation was conducted, in part, to ensure city code met the recommendations of Central Utah Water Conservancy District in order to continue participation in landscape transformation programs. As a part of this evaluation, the City clarified the intent of existing landscape code that prohibits the use of artificial turf in park strips, front yards, buffer zones, and parking lots. The reasons for this prohibition are based on research identifying negative impacts of artificial turf on heat-island effect and storm water quality. Research conducted by the conservation office supported this review and takes the position that, while artificial turf might seem to use less water during commissioning, its manufacturing, cleaning, and disposal may negate those seeming benefits. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-29 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-5 LAW AND POLICY No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected LP-1 Graywater √ √ √ √ Research issues regarding Graywater use and establish appropriate policy. C Initial research completed 2017 NA Is there a way to identify where graywater is being used? USU NA NA LP-2 Irrigation Audit Policy √ √ Develop and adopt an ordinance requiring Irrigation Audits on all new commercial and institutional properties, and accounts which exceed target or set CCF. C 7/2014 Can be compelled through Landscape Ord NA Number of audits and report outcomes NA NA NA LP-3 Irrigation Efficiency Standards √ √ √ Develop and adopt Irrigation Efficiency Standards for all commercial and institutional properties. C 7/2014 Landscape Ord/new construction NA NA Irrigation Association NA NA LP-4 Landscape Ordinance √ √ √ √ Amend existing landscape code to accommodate and encourage water- wise landscaping in front yards and to be consistent with CUWCD model ordinance. C 2022 NA NA SLC Planning NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-30 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-5 LAW AND POLICY No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected LP-5 Parkstrip Code √ √ √ √ Develop and adopt ordinance to accommodate and encourage non- traditional, lower water plantings. C Adopted 2004 (currently in review) NA NA NA NA NA LP-6 Rainwater Harvesting √ Research issues relating to rainwater harvesting and support appropriate legislation. C Adopted by State 2010 (SB 32) Initial investment of $14,000. Barrels sold at cost sustains program. Track water use of known participating households. NA NA NA LP-7 Rain Sensor Ordinance and Policy √ √ Require all properties with automated outdoor sprinkler systems to be fitted with rain sensors. C A component of 2014 water efficient landscape code NA NA NA NA NA LP-8 Squandered Water Ordinance √ √ √ √ Develop and adopt ordinance prohibiting the squandering of water. ID TBD NA NA NA NA TBD LP-9 Sub-surface or Low- impact Irrigation for Small Areas √ √ Require sub-surface or low-impact irrigation on medians, park strips, and in parking lots. C Landscape code prohibits standard irrigation in these areas NA NA NA NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-31 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-5 LAW AND POLICY No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected LP-10 Water Shortage Contingency Plan √ √ √ √ Identify specific calls for action during water shortages and emergencies. C 2025 $75,000 WaterSmart grant with $78,000 in- kind match. See Plan for monitoring details. Funded through grant from Bureau of Reclamation NA NA LP-11 Irrigation- only Meters √ √ √ Review existing policy and make recommendations. √ Review existing policy NA Map: locations, meters that exceed target/frequenc y by user class; potential sites not currently metered NA NA NA LP-12 Sub- metering on New Multi- Family Dwelling Units √ Explore requiring all new multi-family dwelling units to be sub-metered and address metering in mixed use development ID TBD TBD Identify and map submeters NA NA NA LP-13 Alternative Water Sources Use Recommen- dations √ Establish guideline for implementation pertaining to alternative water sources, including secondary water C Study on secondary water sources for park sites was completed 2018. $62,500 See study NA NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-32 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.9 R ESEARCH AND M ETRICS Successful conservation programs require an understanding of the community served, including the relationship of the end water user to their water use. Continuing research helps to identify the ways in which water is used; how it may be over- or misused; and the best means for altering behavior or practices to improve use efficiencies and reduce or eliminate waste. It is also crucial to understand program efficacy and effectiveness. In this regard, identifying meaningful benchmarks and metrics is key to program evaluation, review, and improvement. The value of research and establishment of metrics should not be underestimated; the Governor’s 2017 Recommended State Water Strategy27 devotes an entire chapter to the role of science and technology in enhancing our understanding as well as to develop practical and actionable steps to meet our future water needs. According to the strategic plan, science, technology, and innovation are crucial components of meeting water needs, now and in the future. Fortunately, conservation staff have developed collaborative and cooperative relationships with many academic institutions and professional organizations that offer opportunities to extend knowledge, build understanding, and devise meaningful strategies to move towards water conservation goals. Internally, the water conservation program works with team members from GIS/IT, finance, billing, metering, and engineering to identify areas of study and meaningful benchmarks. For example, through the Water Check program, we know that, while residential property owners tend to apply nearly twice as much water as is necessary to support lawns, commercial and institutional users may irrigate three to four times as much as needed. Though the overall footprint of landscaped areas of non-residential property is less than that of residential property, this represents a great opportunity to reduce water waste, given the degree of overwatering. Applying WaterMAPS™ to commercial and institutional properties will help to quantify the potential water savings, while surveys and focus groups will identify how best to capture that savings. Research into emerging technologies and 27 https://envisionutah.org/utah-water-strategy-project practices will continue as a critical component of effective conservation programing in order to achieve newly established water use reduction goals. FIVE -YEAR FOCUS Research & Metrics Programs •Conduct AWWA M36 Study •Establish Metrics, Benchmarks, & Goals •5 - and 10 -year Program Budget •CII Analytics •SLC D PU/USU Collaborative Research SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-33 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.9.1 CONDUCT AWWA M36 STUDY [R-19] Timeline: 2020-2025 Budget: $125,000 Partners: NA Reach: all Savings/Metric: 2,900 AF (900 million gallons) per year if system losses are reduced to 9%. Note that these savings are not associated with the audit alone, but with the actions taken to eliminate system loss as a result of the audit. Currently, a leak detection program and water data analysis programs are underway. The water conservation office led undertaking the AWWA Manual of Water Supply Practices: M36 Water Audits and Loss Control Program . This comprehensive study will facilitate improvements in water resource management, optimize revenue recovery while promoting equity among rate payers, minimize distribution system interruptions, enhance system integrity, and reduce water waste through identification of metering and system losses. Over the last five years, system losses have averaged approximately 12 percent. While it is not reasonable to expect zero system losses, it is believed that system losses could be reduced to somewhere between 8 to 10 percent with proactive leak detection and repair. Thus, potential water savings could be estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of gallons per year. Next steps include evaluating study recommendations for feasibility of implementation. 4.9.2 ESTABLISH METRICS, BENCHMARKS, AND GOALS FOR CONSERVATION PROGRAMING [R-1, O-6] Timeline: Ongoing Budget: TBD Partners: Reach: all Savings/Metric: TBD Over the lifetime of the conservation program, 16,000 acre-feet of water have been saved annually. Establishing metrics, benchmarks, goals, and potential water savings for conservation programing will facilitate understanding how those savings were achieved, and how best to sustain and enhance those savings. Not all metrics and benchmarks will be identical; for instance, the impact of a brochure or demonstration garden cannot be measured in the same manner as would the effectiveness of rain sensor rebates or Water Checks. Reliance on industry best practices, research by AWE, US-EPS, and AWWA, as well as efforts by other conservation programs to identify benchmarks and metrics will facilitate this program measure. 4.9.3 5- AND 10-YEAR PROPOSED WATER CONSERVATION BUDGET Timeline: 2020-2030 Budget: NA Partners: Internal Reach: Utility-wide Savings/Metric: NA Continued program continuity and success depends on the ability to plan ahead. The establishment of 5- and 10-year budget proposals will facilitate program planning, support partnership arrangements, and optimize grant opportunities. Past budget and program performance, future stakeholder and partnership opportunities, outside conservation program examples, and AWE and AWWA program estimate costs will be consulted in establishing proposed budgets. 4.9.4 LANDSCAPE AND TURF CONVERSION IMPACTS Timeline: Ongoing Budget: NA Partners: CUCWD and Internal Reach: Utility Wide Savings/Metric: Acres of traditional turf converted into alternative landscaping. Beginning in 2022 SLCDPU began offering a low-water grass seed alternative for customers to purchase, referred to as “SLC TurfTrade”. CUWCD also began a landscape transformation rebate program within its entire service area in August 2021. Since that time, many customers within SLCDPU have taken advantage of one or both of these programs, or have independently adjusted their landscaping to be more water conscience. These landscape conversions need to continue for SLCDPU to reach their ultimate goal of outdoor use water reduction. The table below illustrates the acreage of traditional turf that would need to be converted to alternative landscaping to meet interim and long-term conservation targets. The landscape conversions considered were the SLCDPU SLC TurfTrade, a very high water efficiency Waterwise landscape, and a typical CUWCD landscape transformation. Note that the targets shown in this table represent three separate scenarios in which all landscaping is converted into only one alternative; in reality, a mixture of all three landscaping conversions will need to occur to achieve the long-term stated application rates. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-34 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR LANDSCAPE CONVERSION (ACRES) TO ACHIEVE LONG-TERM (2060) GOAL* SLC TurfTrade Conversion Only Waterwise High Efficiency Conversion Only Landscape Transformation Conversion Only Resulting Application Rate (in/yr) 2020 0 0 0 24.7 2025 150 477 718 24.1 2035 2,715 1,599 2,569 23.6 2045 3,839 2,067 3,368 23.3 2060 5,619 2,809 4,633 22.8 * ET Rates: Standard turf =24"; Turf trade = 18"; Waterwise High Efficiency = 12.3"; Landscape Transformation = 20" Application Rates: Standard turf = 34.3"; Turf trade = 25.7"; Waterwise High Efficiency = 13.7"; Landscape Transformation = 22.2" 4.9.5 SLCDPU/USU COLLABORATION [R-1, R-5, O-6, O-16] Timeline: Ongoing Budget: Varies Partners: Varies Reach: Service-wide Savings/Metric: Varies Water Check [R-1, O-6] Timeline: Ongoing Budget: $18,000 (proposed) Partners: USU, MWDSLS, Sandy City Reach: Residential, CII Savings/Metric: 577AF To Date Landscape irrigation accounts for almost 25% of water use within the service area. Understanding how water is used and communicating better practices to home and property owners supports long-term water use reduction goals. The Water Check irrigation audit program was created in 1999 and is provided by Utah State University and the Center for Water Efficient Landscaping, with financial and technical support from department conservation staff and Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy (MWDSLS). Typical Water Check participants know they have a problem but don’t know what to do about it. The Water Check program provides recommended site - specific irrigation schedules as well as irrigation system and landscape action items to help increase their landscape irrigation efficiency. By comparing pre and post Water Check water usage, we know that having a Water Check typically results in a 30% reduction in water use in subsequent years. It’s important to note that audits need to be done regularly to maintain efficiency. Water Check will also be incorporated into future landscape incentive programs. Studies indicate landscape program success depends on pre-qualification and post-verification to ensure landscape interventions are appropriately implemented. Water Check will assist in providing those functions, ensuring that program goals for incentives are met. GIS technology has been integrated with the Water Check application for enhanced data accuracy including use area, asset location, attributes (nozzle spray pattern, etc.), and condition (broken, tilted, etc.). A further benefit is that property owners now receive, along with an electronic report, a site map indicating location, zone, and condition of spray heads. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-35 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Water MAPSTM [R-5, O-16] Timeline: 2018-current Budget: $70,000 annually Partners: USU/CWEL, EWIG Reach: Utility-wide Savings: TBD WaterMAPSTM is a collaboration between the WaterMAPS™ team in USU’s Center for Water Efficient Landscaping (CWEL) and the Water Conservation Program of SLCDPU. WaterMAPSTM provides SLCDPU with technical assistance and science-based analysis to locate and quantify additional landscape water conservation potential so it can determine when, where, and how to deliver current and future outdoor-focused water conservation programs. Besides providing detailed information on outdoor water use to customers, this project will help to effectively utilize existing programs such as Water Check and optimize implementation of new programs such as landscape incentives. How much water conservation potential exists within the landscapes of the service area and how are those potential savings captured? What tools are most effective with any given group of water users to eliminate waste, increase efficiency, and reduce use? The answers to these questions will enable SLCDPU to prioritize delivery of future outdoor water conservation programs and help the community to be adaptive and responsive in its relationship with water in order to create a more sustainable water supply now and for the future. However, we do not know how much water is actually being wasted on existing landscapes. Analysis of city meter data can provide clues as to watering practices, but the question remains: How much irrigation water currently being applied is not necessary to support existing urban landscapes? Application of USU Water Management Analysis and Planning Software (WaterMAPS™) addresses this specific information need. WaterMAPS™ is a custom software application that has been developed by an interdisciplinary team of USU researchers for the purpose of promoting urban landscape water conservation (visit watermaps.usu.edu). WaterMAPS™ integrates water meter data with property records, weather data, and landscape classifications into one database, then enables different time-step calculations of site-specific Landscape Irrigation Ratios (LIRs) that compare landscape water use to landscape water need. The LIRs represent an efficiency standard, with values under 1 indicating efficient use and increasingly higher numbers indicating “capacity to conserve” (or water waste). Various patterns in how LIRs change over time can signal the need for delivery or refinement of conservation messaging and programming. In this project, several different innovations will be implemented in the application of WaterMAPS™ to help SLCDPU meet the challenge of refining and focusing outdoor water conservation programs in the future. From water meter data and Water Checks reports, we “know” many households over water their landscapes. And now, through their WaterMAPS™ reports, homeowners can also understand how they water and identify their own capacity to conserve. But WaterMAPS™ also performs analytics that helps to inform conservation programming. Figure 4.1 shows the number of households in each LIR category over a ten-year period, the majority of which are within the lowest LIR Ranges. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-36 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Within the WaterMAPS™ analysis, we came to recognize four distinct categories of water users: low use and low LIR; low use and high LIR; high use and low LIR; high use and high LIR (see Figure 4.2). This helps in directing programming to more specifically address water use patterns. For example, a house with a low LIR but high use might have completed a landscape transformation but haven’t yet adjusted the watering schedule to reflect the new landscape; they may just need information on watering a new plant palette. Conversely, a house with a high LIR and high-water use might be a good candidate for the landscape transformation program. FIGURE 4-1 AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LIR RANGES F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -1 A VERAGE R ESIDENTIAL LIR R ANGES F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -1 A VERAGE R ESIDENTIAL LIR R ANGES F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -1 A VERAGE R ESIDENTIAL LIR R ANGES F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME FIGURE 4-2 RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIZATION BY LIR AND WATER VOLUME F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 1 -3 P ROJECTED SLCDPU S ERVICE A REA A NNUAL P RODUCTION R EQUIREMENTS FIGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 1 -3 P ROJECTED SLCDPU S ERVICE A REA A NNUAL P RODUCTION R EQUIREMENTS FIGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME F IGURE 1 -3 P ROJECTED SLCDPU S ERVICE A REA A NNUAL P RODUCTION R EQUIREMENTS FIGURE 4 -2 R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORIZATION B Y LIR A ND W ATER V OLUME SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-37 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR Golf Course Turfgrass Study Timeline: 2018-2022 Budget: $45,000 Partners: USU/CWEL Reach: CII Savings/Metric: 30-80% Reduction in water use In 2018, conservation programs began working collaboratively with Salt Lake City Golf (SLC-Golf); Utah State University Department of Plants, Soils, & Climate (USU/CWEL); and the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Forage and Range Research Laboratory (USDA -FRRL) to find solutions that reduce water demand and eliminate water waste while supporting the golf division in enhancing long-term sustainability of its courses by managing fiscal impacts of increasing water costs, all while supporting playability and economic viability of City courses. Conservation staff, SLC-Golf, USU/CWEL, and USDA-FRRL devised field-based research in the areas of drought tolerant grass research, soil surfactant application, water conditioning evaluations, and soil temperature measurement. Outcomes from these studies will not only provide actionable information for SLC-Golf but is already influencing landscape management decisions at department sites and is helping to inform incentive and rebate program planning. This study has been recommended for an additional two-year extension. Alternative Turfgrass Study Timeline: 2020-2023 Budget: $25,000 (proposed) Partners: USU/CWEL Reach: Utility-wide Savings: 1.67 AF/43,500SF Outdoor water use has been an important focus of water conservation efforts locally and statewide over the last twenty years, and in the center of this focus sits Kentucky Blue grass. Over the last fifteen years, USU has conducted field studies of Poa species (blue grass), as well as other grass species and varieties with the intent of identifying alternative turfs to traditional lawn grass. The outcome of these studies has been the identification of turfs requiring fewer inputs while still delivering on the aesthetic and environmental qualities that make lawns so compelling a landscape choice. Conservation staff propose to work with USU and other partners to increase the use of these turf grasses within the service area as well as regionally, through a number of strategies. These will include turf demonstration areas, installation of these turfs on department properties, development of educational and promotional materials, collaboration with seed and sod growers, and consideration for inclusion in incentive programming. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-38 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR An outcome of these ongoing studies was the identification of a low-water residential quality turf grass that requires 30 to 40% less water than the typical Kentucky bluegrass Lawn. In 2022, the Utility launched the SLC TurfTrade program, making available a low-water seed mix at cost to customers within the service area. The success of this project was immediate, with over 2,000 households purchasing and planting SLC TurfTrade grass seed. The program has now spread to Colorado, Arizona, California, and even to communities in Ontario, Canada. Synthetic Grass Study Timeline: 2026 Budget: $25,000 (proposed) Partners: USU/CWEL Reach: All Savings/Metric: Completed white paper It is commendable that we strive to identify new ways to reduce water use and eliminate water waste. As part of this search for solutions, however, it is also important that impacts to other areas of environmental concern are incorporated into decision making. It is also important that as best as possible, unintended consequences are also considered. Synthetic grass has been presented as a solution to reducing water use in landscapes. When lifecycle water use is calculated, this premise seems more tenuous. Research provides information regarding impacts to human health, urban heat island effects, and water quality. USU, working with conservation staff, conducted a metastudy on research pertaining to artificial turf, with a desire to identify any potential negative impacts to soil health, surrounding landscape health, surrounding landscape water demand, and insect populations. Study outcome indicates there is little or no scientific research pertaining to these questions. As a result, a collaborative research study is being designed and proposed to conduct field and modeling studies to measure impacts, if any, of synthetic turf on landscape, soil, and beneficial insect health. Irrigation-Only Meter Budgets Review Timeline: 2026 Budget: $4,000 Partners: USU/CWEL Reach: utility-wide Savings/Metric: TBD In 2003, a seasonally tiered rate structure was adopted. A component of those rates was the establishment of rates specific for those properties with meters that serviced only outdoor, landscape water needs. Those accounts are referred to as Irrigation-Only Meter Accounts. In conjunction with USU, budgets based on square footage of landscaped areas and evapotranspiration were established for each property with irrigation-only meters. Improvements in best practices, irrigation system technologies (including irrigation controllers and sensors), and turfgrass may allow for revisions of established budgets without negatively affecting landscapes. Additionally, new conservation goals articulated in the Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Plan indicate a greater level of outdoor water conservation is necessary to achieve short- and long-term water use reduction goals. Accordingly, a review of the landscape water budgets is in order. 4.9.6 SLCDPU/CVWCD LANDSCAPE TRANSFORMATION ANALYSIS [R-] Timeline: 2020 to present Budget: NA Partners: CUWCD Reach: Service area Savings/Metric: Acreage converted; metered use reductions; reduced LIRs This practice will analyze water use reduction resulting from landscape transformations, including participation in CUWCD Landscape Transformation program, SLC TurfTrade, and non-participant landscape transformations. Working in coordination with CUWCD, team will track acreage conversion, water use reduction, and echo effect (impact of transformations on neighboring properties). SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-39 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR 4.9.7 CII WATER DEPLETION EVALUATION AND CONSERVATION/GREAT SALT LAKE IMPACTS [R- 20, R-21] Timeline: 2026 Budget: TBD Partners: TBD Reach: service area Savings/Metric: TBD Building on the City and Utility’s commitment to protect Great Salt Lake (GSL), this practice will attempt to determine the impact of conservation on GSL water levels and also measure water depletion of various CII user classifications. 4.9.8 CII ANALYTICS [R-20] Timeline: 2017-2022 Budget: $135,000 Partners: NA Reach: CII Savings/Metric: TBD The service area is comprised of a diverse customer base, from suburban residential properties to high-density urban core dwellings, and from art spaces to tattoo parlors, health food stores to hospitals, model toy stores to airports, and gas stations to oil refineries. While our residential base is rich in its diversity, understanding water demand, use patterns, and barriers to behavioral change seem straightforward when compared to the diversity and complexity of our CII customers. Conservation staff began working on CII analytics in earnest in 2015. Since that time and working with a team of consultants, we have developed a method for gathering, analyzing, and assessing water use within the CII sector. With tools developed by Radian Inc., we can now begin to develop realistic water efficiency targets for commercial, industrial, and institutional (CII) clients through better understanding of demand patterns, specific CII sector analysis, and comparisons to newly developing national standards data. Through this process advanced and automated reporting queries, automatic updates for consumption, weather, GIS, and AMI data with usage and other predefined alerts have been developed to provide valuable information to conservation program staff. By integrating existing commercial billing data and established NAICS codes with external data sources including GIS, AMI, and weather, a clearer picture of water demand emerges. This in turn helps support water use reduction efforts in the CII sector in a meaningful, actionable way. CII customers comprise roughly 12 percent of the connections within the service area, and their total water demand accounts for half of water use. In order to more fully integrate CII customers with conservation planning, it is necessary to understand how water is used in order to drive sustainable conservation within this sector to achieve long-term water reduction goals while still maintaining a vibrant, healthy economy. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-40 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-6 RESEARCH AND METRICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected R-1 Water Check √ √ √ √ Promote and conduct lawn sprinkler check-ups for residential, commercial, and institutional properties √ (S) Estab. 1988; Partnered with USU 2007. Ongoing. $60,000 provided by MWDSLS annually. SLCDPU funds additional components, including APP, portal, and GIS capability ($45,000) Map and track use. MWDSL&S, USU/CWEL 47,000 gallons per participating residential customer annually R-2 EPA Residential Study √ Measure and evaluate water efficiency in newly constructed homes. √ Completed 201128 $20,000/ $360,000 grant and partners Map participating households. EPA Grant; Aquacraft, Inc., 8 participant cities NA NA R-3 Irrigation Controller Study √ √ √ Test and evaluate weather-based irrigation controllers. √ On-going (USU) NA Study outcomes inform recommend- dations USU/CWEL NA NA R-4 Irrigation Intervention Study √ Investigate impediments and barriers for homeowners in correcting irrigation system defects. √ Initial studies conducted 5/2015, 2018 Funded in FY2013-14 cons. budget; matched by USU NA USU NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active 28 DeOreo, William, and Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. Analysis of Water Use in New Single-Family Homes. Boulder Co. January 2011 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-41 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-6 RESEARCH AND METRICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected R-5 WaterMAPS™ √ √ √ √ Utilize technology developed by USU to analyze potential water-use savings in landscape settings. √ Phase1: Study began August 2018. Phase 2: began implementing WaterMAPS™ software over service area. Phase 1: $49,000; Phase 2: $50,000 with EWIG match grant Monitor LIR by parcel, sector USU/CWEL; EWIG NA TBD R-6 Landscape Inventory √ √ √ √ Inventory alternative landscapes and quantify savings. √ 2019 NA Identify, map, measure, compare USU, SL Co Master Gardeners, community citizen scientists NA TBD R-7 Residential Plumbing Fixtures Inventory √ √ √ Inventory upgrades in plumbing fixtures and calculate quantity of remaining, older fixtures. TBD TBD TBD Compare water use between sites; refer to End Water Use Study TBD NA TBD R-8 Water Softener Study √ √ √ √ Research effects on water softener use on waste stream quality and impacts on water re-use water quality. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-42 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-6 RESEARCH AND METRICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected R-9 Supply and Demand Master Plan √ Analyze the impacts of conservation on the assumptions pertaining to storage and capacity. √ Component of 2020 Water Conservation Master Plan and Storage and Conveyance Master Plan SLCDPU Engineering - Consultant: Bowen Collins NA Since 2007 projected peak demand 270 MGD; current projection 200 MGD R-10 Climate Change, and Resiliency √ √ √ √ Review existing research on climate change; evaluate impacts of conservation on risk reduction and mitigation. √ Study currently being conducted - - NA NA R-11 Secondary Water Irrigation Master Plan √ √ √ √ Study availability, quality, and opportunity to use non-culinary water sources. C 2019 Water Resources Division budget and SLC Public Services Map locations using non- culinary water: by customer class and water source. SLC Public Services Consultant: Bowen Collins NA NA R-12 Commercial and Industrial Water Demand Study √ Evaluate C&I was use patterns and water-use reduction innovations. √ 2015 - Ongoing Phase 1 & 2: funded $10,000 each budget cycle 2015/16 and 2016/17 Phase 3 & 4: $50,000 funded in 2017/18 Analysis and monitor CII water use sector, account - NA TBD ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-43 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-6 RESEARCH AND METRICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected R-13 Behavior and Policy Study √ Conduct studies linking consumer behavior and policy development. C Completed 2017/18: Can we map participant locations? USU Consumer study and iUtah study. NA NA R-14 Incentives √ √ √ √ Study incentive programs; investigate. ID TBD NA Survey/audit to determine reach/interest/ product. Map and track use. USU/CWEL, AWE, US- EPA, IA NA TBD R-15 Turf Study √ √ √ √ Turf bluegrass and alternative turfs to identify best qualities/applicatio ns. √ 2017/18; Golf Turf Study completed summer 2019 – recommend contract extension. Mapping begun Fall 2019. SLC TurfTrade launch 2022. $50,000 for study. No cost for SLC TurfTrade program Comparative water use Funded $25,000 in 2017/18 budget, with $25,000 match from USU. USDA- FRR NA TBD R-16 Program Effec- tiveness √ √ √ √ Where appropriate, develop methodology to measure practice impact. ID Ongoing TBD varies USU/CWEL NA NA R-17 Projected Demand Reduction √ √ √ √ Develop baseline and projected customer-class water demand. C Water Supply and Demand Master Plan Study (2022) SLCDPU Engineering WaterMAPS™, CII tool Consultant: Bowen Collins - 16,100 AF/ Annually ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 4-44 CONSERVATION PRACTICES: CHAPTER FOUR TABLE 4-6 RESEARCH AND METRICS No. Practice Classification Brief Description Practice Timeline Cost/Funding Reach/Metric Partnership Savings Res Ind Com Inst Status Implementation To Date Projected R-18 Artificial Turf Study √ √ √ √ Study impacts of artificial turf on landscape water need and soil health √ Metastudy completed 2019; field study proposed TBD - USU/CWEL NA NA R-19 Water Loss Control Study √ Complete loss audit based on AWWA M36 standards and implement findings. C Completed 2025, to be updated annually $70,000 Track percentage loss after implementatio n of plan components. NA - TBD R-20 CII Water Depletion Evaluation √ √ √ Research and evaluate methodologies for determining CII depletion levels. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA NA R-21 GSL √ √ √ √ Evaluate and estimate water demand reductions related to Great Salt Lake TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD NA NA ID - In Development NA - Not Applicable NC - No Cost TBD - To Be Determined C – Completed √ – Active SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 5-1 PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION PLAN: CHAPTER FIVE DRAFT CHAPTER 5: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION PLAN 5.0 I NTRODUCTION This Communications and Outreach Plan (COP) serves two primary purposes: first, to actively gather input and feedback from customers and stakeholders during the development of the 2025 Water Conservation Plan; and second, to establish a clear, inclusive process for informing and engaging the community throughout the plan’s implementation. The COP outlines strategies designed to promote meaningful participation, transparency, and trust. Engagement efforts will include both in -person and digital tools to ensure broad accessibility. These efforts will be coordinated with key milestones to encourage feedback that can directly shape the plan and its implementation. While digital platforms—such as social media, surveys, and virtual meetings— will play a major role, we recognize that not all community members have reliable internet access. To ensure equitable participation, outreach will also include printed materials and postings at high-traffic public locations such as libraries, recreation centers, parks, and golf courses. By combining modern communication tools with trusted, community-based engagement methods, this plan ensures that all voices have the opportunity to be heard and that the final Water Conservation Plan reflects the shared values and priorities of the community it serves. 5.1 G OALS AND O BJECTIVES To ensure the desired outcomes, the communications and outreach goals are to: • Create meaningful opportunities for community feedback during the development of the Water Conservation Plan; • Identify and involve a wide range of stakeholders, ensuring that all community voices are represented; • Facilitate the transfer of technical information to educate and encourage public engagement; SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 Page 5-2 PUBLIC OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION PLAN: CHAPTER FIVE • Provide timely and transparent responses to public questions and feedback; • Establish credibility and build trust in the planning process; • Build partnerships with municipalities within the service area; • Achieve public understanding and support for the plan’s adoption and implementation. 5.2 S TAKEHOLDERS AND S PECIAL I NTERESTS Stakeholder engagement is a cornerstone of this plan. In addition to the general public, special outreach will be made to: • Internal Stakeholders: SLC Parks and Public Lands (Forestry, Open Space, Parks), SLC Golf, SLC Planning, SLCDPU Engineering, Sustainability, etc. • Municipal Partners: Millcreek, Holladay, Murray, South Salt Lake, Cottonwood Heights, Salt Lake County. • Advisory and Oversight Bodies: Public Utility Advisory Committee (PUAC), Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy. • Political Leadership: SLC Mayor’s Office, City Council, and mayoral offices of partner cities. • Other Agencies and Advocacy Groups: Utah Division of Water Resources, Jordan Valley Water Conservation District, AWWA, USU Extension, environmental nonprofits, and community advocacy organizations. Meetings, presentations, surveys, and regular updates will be tailored to fit the interests and level of involvement of each stakeholder group. A full stakeholder matrix is available in the project documentation. 5.3 M EDIA AND S OCIAL P LATFORMS A multi-channel media strategy will ensure outreach is inclusive, engaging, and far-reaching: • Website: All project information, including draft plans and FAQs, will be posted at slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025, with links provided on other City pages. • News Releases: Coordinated with the SLC Mayor’s Office to announce project milestones, draft releases, and public comment periods. • Blogs: Stories and updates will be posted on City and partner blogs to provide both technical content and human-interest narratives. • Facebook / Instagram / X (formerly Twitter): o One post per week over a six-month period. • Content includes project updates, meeting notices, water-saving tips, and community stories. • Interactive Q&A formats and reposting from partner organizations will extend reach. • YouTube / SLCtv Media: Short video vignettes and a 2-minute animated video will communicate plan highlights. A recorded virtual townhall will be posted here. • Community Media: Outreach will include local radio, the Salt Lake Chamber’s “Building Utah” podcast, and communications through schools, libraries, and partner organizations. 5.4 A VENUES OF C OMMUNICATION Community input will be collected via: • Digital surveys (including QR codes on fliers and signs) • Public meetings (in-person and virtual) • Email, phone, and social media messaging • Comment cards and signage at events and public locations All feedback will be compiled, analyzed, and shared with the project team. A final outreach summary will include an executive summary of community feedback, a record of comments received, and a list of outreach activities conducted. 5.5 O NGOING C OMMUNICATIONS AND O UTREACH Strategies employed during plan development will continue over the duration of the plan implementation to enhance public understanding, program acceptance, and active engagement. SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-1 APPENDICES APPENDICES SLCDPU Water Service Area Map MWDSLS ULS Report 2024. Table 4: Salt Lake City Water Usage and Conservation Trends State Division of Water Resources 2025 Water Conservation Plan Checklist ANSI/AWWA GA80 -13 Water Conservation Program Operation and Management Standard, First Edition July 1, 2013 Water Conservancy Budget 2025/26 17.16.092: Water Shortage Management Policy 21A -48 -055 Water Efficient Landscaping Standards Public Utility Advisory Committee Minutes/Water Conservation Plan Discussion Minutes of the Meeting of the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy Board Minutes/Water Conservation Plan Minutes of the Salt Lake City Council Fourmal Meeting Salt Lake City Council Transmittal, Minutes and Resolution M36 Water Audit Summaries (2022 -24) SLCDPU Drought Contingency Plan Summary Impacts of Water Conservation on Rates Technical Memorandum, 2025 Water Conservation Program Manager Job Description Conservation Action Plans Residential Water Sales Targets Links & References Glossary of Terms, Abbreviations & Acronyms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-2 APPENDICES A. SLCDPU W ATER S ERVICE A REA M AP PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE AREA SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-3 APPENDICES B. MWDSLS ULS R EPORT 2024, T ABLE 4: S ALT L AKE C ITY W ATER U SAGE AND C ONSERVATION T RENDS TABLE 4 - SALT LAKE CITY WATER USAGE AND CONSERVATION TRENDS DOCUMENTATION OF CONSERVATION PERFORMANCE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SALT LAKE & SANDY Year Without Consideration of Worker Population Population Adjusted Based on Worker Population Relative to WFRC Average ULS Goal (gpcd) State Goal (gpcd) Population Annual Metered Sales (gallons) Per Capita Use (gpcd) Population Employment Average Employment Based on Population Worker Population Above Averages Total Equivalent Population Annual Metered Sales (gallons) Per Capita Use (gpcd) New State Goal (gpcd) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 287,431 287,405 287,379 287,353 287,327 287,300 288,445 289,765 290,671 291,312 291,953 309,664 310,387 310,516 311,066 312,281 316,028 319,820 323,658 327,542 331,473 335,450 324,022 325,683 327,352 32,479,397,940 31,156,592,852 27,795,222,972 25,866,715,160 25,709,610,476 23,230,740,000 25,546,829,220 28,409,000,000 24,713,538,800 24,339,970,111 24,684,871,280 22,851,774,007 27,244,926,535 26,132,150,545 24,536,287,605 23,694,971,212 24,524,178,919 25,515,449,124 25,371,120,280 22,597,819,761 25,648,647,896 22,407,825,138 22,654,139,073 21,327,273,801 25,384,118,751 310 297 265 247 245 222 243 269 233 229 232 202 240 231 216 208 213 219 215 189 212 183 192 179 212 287,431 287,405 287,379 287,353 287,327 287,300 288,445 289,765 290,671 291,312 291,953 309,664 310,387 310,516 311,066 312,281 316,028 319,820 323,658 327,542 331,473 335,450 324,022 325,683 327,352 255,161 259,575 264,066 268,634 275,242 280,500 283,762 285,060 285,951 286,582 287,213 283,183 283,844 284,292 284,740 286,633 290,072 293,553 297,076 300,641 304,249 307,899 401,343 407,806 411,821 148,889 148,876 148,862 148,849 148,835 148,821 149,415 150,098 150,568 150,900 151,232 160,406 160,780 160,847 161,132 151,144 152,958 154,793 156,651 158,530 160,433 162,358 147,754 148,511 149,273 106,272 110,699 115,204 119,785 126,407 131,679 134,348 134,962 135,383 135,682 135,981 122,777 123,064 123,444 123,608 135,489 137,115 138,760 140,425 142,110 143,816 145,542 253,589 259,294 262,548 312,192 313,198 314,221 315,263 316,780 317,981 319,748 321,211 322,215 322,926 323,637 338,271 339,061 339,279 339,867 343,850 347,976 352,152 356,377 360,654 364,982 369,362 376,008 378,838 381,174 32,479,397,940 31,156,592,852 27,795,222,972 25,866,715,160 25,709,610,476 23,230,740,000 25,546,829,220 28,409,000,000 24,713,538,800 24,339,970,111 24,684,871,280 22,851,774,007 27,244,926,535 26,132,150,545 24,536,287,605 23,694,971,212 24,524,178,919 25,515,449,124 25,371,120,280 22,597,819,761 25,648,647,896 22,407,825,138 22,654,139,073 21,327,273,801 25,384,118,751 285 273 242 225 222 200 219 242 210 207 209 185 220 211 198 189 193 199 195 172 193 166 165 154 182 285 283 281 280 278 276 274 273 271 269 267 265 264 262 260 258 257 255 253 251 249 248 247 246 245 285 282 279 276 274 271 268 265 262 259 257 254 251 248 245 242 239 237 234 231 228 225 222 219 217 210 209 207 206 204 203 201 200 198 197 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-4 APPENDICES C. S TATE D IVISION OF W ATER R ESOURCES 2025 W ATER C ONSERVATION P LAN C HECKLIST State Div of Water Resources 2025 Water Conservation Plan Checklist Section Requirement Documentation System Profile 1 Population, Serive Area, Existing Water Users 1.1 Provide map of current service area. Page 1-2 and Appendix B 1.2 List number of M&I water connections, categorized by type: (Residential/Domestic, Commercial, Institutional, Industrial, Unmetered) Table 2-3 2 Supply 2.1 Chart current water supply, categorized by source (Wells, Springs, Surface, Purchased, Exchanged) Section 1.3.1 and 1.3.2 2.2 Describe when applicable, occurrences of groundwater depletion, aquifer recharge (artificial and natural) and storage and recovery practices. No groundwater depletion has occurred. Aquifer Recharge and Recovery program discussed on page 1-5 and 1-6. 2.3 Provide comparison graph, which includes a) reliable supply through 2050, b) current water use projections and c) efficient use. Figure 1-4 2.4 If after reaching conservation targets, use exceeds supply, list future water sources and cost projections. Not applicable. Please see the SLC Water Supply and Demand Master Plan. 3 Water Measurement and Billing SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-5 APPENDICES State Div of Water Resources 2025 Water Conservation Plan Checklist Section Requirement Documentation 3.1 List current water measurement methods and practices. (percent of metered connections by type, reading frequency, calibration schedule, new development laws & replacement schedule) 1) 100% of connections are metered; 2) Meters are read roughly every 30 days; 3) Solid-state multijet and ultrasonic meters are sealed in factory and calibrated to AWWA Standards and not calibrated in field. Flow tests may be conductyed in field. when meters do not perform to AWWA standards they are replaced ; Non-AMI meters 1.5" and up are field tested at a rate of appox 1000 meters per year. 4) All new connections are required to be metered per code; 5) All 3/4" and 1" meters within SLCDPU service area are scheduled to be replaced with AMI within next 6 years.Larger meters are replaced as needed, though 85% of 1.5" meters and up are OMNI C1 or OMNI F2. 3.2 List water (by volume: Acre-Feet or M Gallons) and revenue losses and the control practices implemented to minimize both. If utilizing the AWWA Free Water Audit Software© please list water audit validity grade. See M36 Summary in Appendices L. Current system loss is estimated to be 11% of production volume, or 8,036 AF. Water audit validity grade is 65/100. Implementation of M36 was completed 2022, 2023, and 2024. 3.3 Include a copy of the system's water rate structure in the WCP. For a retail water supplier, as defined in Section 19 -4- 102, the retail water supplier's rate structure that is: (A) adopted by the retail water supplier's governing body in accordance with Section 73-10-32.5; and (B) current as of the day the retail water supplier files a water conservation plan https://www.slc.gov/utilities/what-new-rates-mean/ 3.4 List leak detection and repair methods, include details on a loss prevention plan if applicable See M36 Water Audit summary pages (Appendices L) 4 Water Use 4.1 Gather 2005-current records of potable and non-potable water use by sector and service area population. Please check for accuracy and consistency with what is submitted to Water Rights at: www.waterrights.utah.gov/wateruse/WaterUseList.asp Table 2-1 and Table 2-4. SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-6 APPENDICES State Div of Water Resources 2025 Water Conservation Plan Checklist Section Requirement Documentation 4.2 List current total potable and non-potable water deliveries by volume (please specify volume: Acre-Feet or M Gallons) categorized by type: (Residential/Domestic, Commercial, Institutional, Industrial, Wholesale and Un-metered). Table 2-1 and Table 2-4. 4.3 Chart current per capita water use in gallons per capita per day (GPCD) by type and use: (Total water deliveries/365/Total service area population=GPCD). Table 2-6 and Figure 2-14. 4.4 Graph your water efficiency progress: Take 2005-today, total potable and non-potable water use by sector and population records and go to www.conservewater.utah.gov/compliance.html for a Conservation Goal Calculator and Graph. Then input data and produce graph for WCP. Figure 2-1 and Figure 3-2. Conservation Practices 5 Conservation Practices 5.1 Provide update on ongoing practices and list and detail all ongoing and new conservation practices. When implementing new practices provide costs, partnerships and implementation timeline. (BMP options at www.conservewater.utah.gov/compliance.html) See Chapter 4, Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-6 5.2 Provide names and contact information for those responsible for meeting efficiency goals. (i.e. Administrative staff, conservation coordinator(s), conservation committee members, Mayor, town council and/or board members.) Stephanie Duer, SLCDPU Water Conservation Program Manager stephanie.duer@slc.gov 801.483.6860 5.3 Share evaluation of existing water conservation best management effectiveness Over the past 18 years of active program implementation, SLCDPU has seen a 24% reduction in total water use; 26% reduction in peak demand (see Chapter 2 Highlights). Achievements have exceeded goals set by Gov's Office, State regional goals, and CUP Contract. See Figure 3-2. 5.4 List new Best Management Practice(s) and implementation plan(s). See Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-6. 5.5 List and detail all Conservation Public Awareness practices implemented. See Table 4-2 . SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-7 APPENDICES State Div of Water Resources 2025 Water Conservation Plan Checklist Section Requirement Documentation 5.6 List and detail all Education/Training practices implemented. See Table 4-2 . 5.7 List and detail all Rebates/Incentives/Rewards currently implemented. See Table 4-3 . 5.8 List and detail conservation Ordinances & Standards currently implemented. See Table 4-5 . 5.9 List water waste prohibition and model landscape ordinances. See Appendices G. 5.10 Include a copy of the system's drought contingency plan. See Appendices F and O. 5.11 List Reviews or Updates to City Codes/Requirements pertaining to Water Waste Prohibition, Model Landscape Ordinance, Water Shortage Plan, Climate Resiliency Plan See Table 4-5. Next Steps 6 Public Meetings and Adoption 6.1 After receiving approval from DWRe to move forward with Public/Board/Council Adoption. Following adoption, please email the follwoin to waterwise@utah.gov: * Final approved Water Conservation Plan * Water Conservation Plan Resolution/Adoption signatures * Public meeting notice & approved meeting minutes See Appendices J and K. 6.2 Post the water conservation plan on a public website. See Utility website: www.slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-8 APPENDICES D. ANSI/AWWA G480 -13 W ATER C ONSERVATION P ROGRAM O PERATION AND M ANAGEMENT S TANDARD , F IRST E DITION . J ULY 1, 2013 Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed 4.1 Regulatory Requirements 4.1.1 Demonstrate meet or exceed applicable regulatory requirements for jurisdiction: 1) Utah Water Conservation Plan Act 73.10.32: Submit Water Conservation Plan to State DWRe every five years 2) Utah Governor’s Conservation Goal (non-mandatory): reduce water use by 25% from baseline year 2001 (Exceeded) 3) CUP Conservation Goal (Exceeded) 1) Have submitted Water Conservation Master Plans (WCMP) as required and to standards 2) have consistently exceeded State-wide conservation goals (see 2020 WCMP Chapter 3, Figure 3-2 ) 3) Have consistently exceeded ULS Contractual Conservation Goal (see 2020 WCMP Chapter 3, Figure 3-2) 1) 2025 Water Conservation Master Plan in process 1) 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014, 2020 2) See Figure 3-2 3) on-going 4.2 Top Level Organizational Functions 4.2.1 Staff for conservation initiatives 4.2.1 Assign dedicated water conservation coordinator Provide job description of staff person assigned duties, Appendices O June, 2001. Last update 2/15/2024. 4.2.2 Water conservation planning 4.2.2 Create, implement, and maintain a water conservation plan www.slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025 2025 Plan Update to be completed by Oct 2025 1999, 2004, 2009, 2014 , 2020 Plan guided by AWWA M52 – AWWA Water Conservation Programs – a Planning Manual or some other guidance Refer to this list and corresponding references. See Appendices L. 2022, 2023, 2024 Plan must: 1. Address water conservation across all relevant customer categories See 2020 WCMP Chapter 3, and in particular Table 3- 3. See Chapter 4, Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-6. See 2025 Water Conservation Master Plan Completed 2025 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-9 APPENDICES Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed Plan should include: 1. Clearly defined and measurable program performance goals 2. A suite of benchmarks that can be used to assess progress in implementation of the program 3. A supply assessment 4. Water conservation strategy 5. Water conservation goals 6. Plan evaluation 7. Ongoing plan maintenance See 2025 WCMP 1. Chapter 3, 2. Chapter 3, Table 3-3 3. Chapter 2 4. Chapter 4, Tables 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 4-6 5. Chapter 3 6. Chapter 4 7. Chapter 4 Ongoing with each Plan implementation 4.2.3 Water conservation in integrated resources planning 4.2.3 Treat conservation equally to other water supply options Water Conservation participated in or led development of the 2022 Major Conveyance Study, Supply and Demand Study, Water Resources Data Study, 2025 Water Shortage Contingency, 2023 40- Year Water Supply Plan, Growing Water Smart (2025) The years these studies were updated or completed varies; engagement in implementation is ongoing. Where appropriate, include water made available through conservation as part of the supply portfolio when conducting supply and demand forecasting analyses See SLC Water Supply and Demand Master Plan, and 2022 WCMP Chapter 2, Figure 1-5 2022 4.2.4 Public information and education program SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-10 APPENDICES Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed 4.2.4 Develop or incorporate into existing programs information efforts aimed at: • raising awareness • fostering a culture of conservation and behavior change www.slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025, Chapter 4, Section 4.5 On-going Components of program should include: • Effectively communicating the value of water • Information on methods and opportunities for reducing consumption • Deliver consistent and persistent messages www.slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025, Chapter 5. On-going 4.2.5 Water waste ordinance 4.2.5 Develop or support creation, implementation, and maintenance of an enforceable water waste ordinance www.slc.gov/utilities/water-conservation-plan-2025, Chapter 4, Section 4.8.1 Proposed in 2025 Water Conservation Master Plan. 4.3 Internal Utility Actions and Requirements 4.3.1 Metering Practices 4.3.1 Implement metering practices that promote conservation, including metering of: • All water sources • All service connections Salt Lake City has been fully metered on the user side since the 1920s. Monthly billing to all of its customers commenced shortly after. Computerized billing began in the 1970s. Bills are now available as mailing or electronically. Most source waters are metered at treatment locations. Completed 1920, On-going SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-11 APPENDICES Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed 4.3.1.1 Universal metering Move towards implementing universal metering of all service (private and public) connections Metering completed in 1920s. Currently converting to AMI technology. Remaining AMI conversion expected to take 4 to 6 years Fully metered, 1920; On-going for AMI implementation Establish goal to meter 100 percent of all service connections SLCDPU has been fully metered since 1920’s. 1920s 4.3.1.2 Source water metering Implement metering of all sources including: • Groundwater • Surface water • Reclaimed water Water sources are metered. On-going 4.3.2 Rate structures 4.3.2 Use a nonpromotional water rate that provides incentive for customers to reduce water use http://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/PDF%20Files/Utility Rates/WaterrateswebCurrent.pdf 2003 4.3.3 Billing practices 4.3.3 Bill customers based on metered use http://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/PDF%20Files/Utility Rates/WaterrateswebCurrent.pdf 1920’s 4.3.3.1 Billing frequency Bill at least bi-monthly Billing occurs on monthly basis (see above attachment) http://www.slcdocs.com/utilities/PDF%20Files/Utility Rates/WaterrateswebCurrent.pdf 1920’s 4.3.3.2 Reporting Consumption Clearly indicate units for consumption See example bill: 2025-05_UtilityBill-Explanation-presentation-r2 Bills have shown consumption since 2003; Updated 2025. SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-12 APPENDICES Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed 4.3.4 Landscape efficiency program 4.3.4 Establish a program to improve and maintain water efficient landscapes and irrigation (See Chapter 4 for program details) Many programs support landscape water efficiency, including: Water Check WaterMAPSTM SLC Landscape Best Practices Manual Landscape Code 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers Water Checks since 1998; WaterMAPSTM customer reports since 2023; Landscape code updated 2023. 4.3.4.1 Design, installation, and maintenance practices Develop program intended to maximize water efficiency through proper design, installation, and maintenance of new and existing landscapes and irrigation systems. Programs may include: • Audits • Financial incentives • Design information • Ordinances • Development standards • Education • Examples of how to properly design and operate irrigation systems Water Check WaterMAPSTM SLC Gardenwise (www.slcgardenwise.com) 21A.48 Landscaping and Buffers, parkstrip and front yard codes SLC Landscape Best Practices Manual SLC TurfTrade Learning Labs Rebates Water Checks since 1998; SLC TurfTrade since 2022; WaterMAPSTM since 2023; Landscape code updated 2023. 4.3.4.2 Irrigation scheduling • Encourage customers to water based upon plant needs • Discourage customers from overwatering or watering during the times of day when water loss to evaporation and wind drift is greatest Plant and Hydrozone list SLC Gardenwise (www.slcgardenwise.com) Code 21A.48 Landscapes and Buffers, hydrozoning Lawn watering guide Water Checks WaterMAPSTM Water Waste ordinance Water Checks since 1998; SLC TurfTrade since 2022; WaterMAPSTM since 2023; Landscape code updated 2023. 4.3.4.3 Landscape water budgets • Where appropriate, implement landscape water budgets to address water use and encourage efficiency See Attachment: Irrigation-Only Meters and Rates https://www.slc.gov/utilities/what-new-rates- mean/ 2003 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-13 APPENDICES Section Requirement Documentation To Do Date Completed 4.3.5 Distribution system and pressure management 4.3.5.1 Water utility audit Conduct an annual audit of the system using AWWA/IWA Water Audit Method, including AWWA Water Audit Reporting Worksheet See Appendices L. 2022, 2023, 2024 4.3.5.2 Water loss control program Develop a water loss control program Leak detection and repair program implemented 2025. See Chapter 4, Section 4.7.3 and Tables 4-3 and 4-4. On-going 4.4 External Policy Requirements 4.4.1 Water efficiency in building codes and standards 4.4.1 Encourage: • adoption of water efficient codes and standards • adoption at both state and local level Provide evidence that water efficiency is addressed in local building codes for new buildings. (5.1.8) 21A.48 Landscapes and Buffers 2023 4.4.2 Promote water efficient products and services 4.4.2 Promote the use and maintenance of water efficient: • Products • Practices • Services Water Stewardship Calendar Water Check program CUP Rebates partner On-going 4.5 Wholesale Agency Requirements 4.5 Directly implement: • 4.1 Regulatory Requirements • 4.2.4 Public Information and Education Program • 4.3 Internal Utility Actions and Requirements N/A May provide: • Regional coordination on conservation issues and program • Technical assistance to their retail agencies N/A May manage conservation activities that are more effectively implemented on a regional scale N/A SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-14 APPENDICES E. W ATER C ONSERVATION B UDGET 2025/26 Program Cost center Contract Number 24/25 Budget 25/26 Budget Notes Budget Total (excluding personnel) 51701 $ 671,598.00 Public Relations 51701 100,000 $ 100,000 Water Week, plumbing repair how-to guides, Wyland Foundation Mobile Water Learning Lab (grades 3-5), conservation strategic plan, conservation messaging, etc. Other Prof Services 51701 $ 207,000.00 Water Check support team CA-004072 (2024 Water Check Season) 22,000 $ 22,000.00 Agreement with MWDSLS. Perform full audits on all golf sites; ground truth mapping; post-verify SLC TurfTrade; other CI sites. WaterMAPSTM CA-003891 (Dec 2026) 70,000 $ 70,000.00 Perform updated imagery analysis; areas approx. 10sq mi. based on customer tier, customer LIR, or other criteria. Goal is to update all residential properties with updated imagery. Contract is for 140,000, to provide two years of WaterMAPSTM updates. CII Tool In progress 0 $ 45,000 Analytics dashboard upgrades. Conservation Plan In progress $90,000 $25,000 Will also close up M36 and drought plan with parallel data. Conservation Plan In progress $50,000 Funds to hire a consultant to support and facilitate public outreach of conservation plan and water shortage plan. USU/Golf Turf Study CA-003369 (Dec 2025) 50,000 $ 50,000.00 Turf trials; GCSAA grant opportunity. Contract extended one year. GardenWise Website update 0 $12,000.00 Increase functionality; update images; add sites; etc. USU/Climate Center Weather Station Calibration signed, awaiting recording 0 $8,500.00 USU Weather Station Calibration for 5 sites. Completing 10-year contract; these funds will need to be allocated annually for duration on contract. Previously part of the WaterMAPSTM contract. Other Expenses 51701 $ 63,200.00 Grass seed 50,000 $ 23,000.00 1400– 2000 grass seed. Cost returned to utility. Rain barrels 0 $ 40,200.00 600 barrels. This item may not need to be funded if we continue agreement with Upcycle Products as they collect payment and there is no Utility expense. Landscape Transformation Grants $100,000 To facilitate landscape transformations and indoor fixture upgrades for qualifying households. Out Ground Maintenance Supplies 51701 $ 268,000.00 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-15 APPENDICES Program Cost center Contract Number 24/25 Budget 25/26 Budget Notes Landscape Transformations 51701 100,000 $100,000.00 Landscape upgrades to improve efficiencies. Utility sites: 50K sqft of lawn that could be replaced. 20K lawn that could be converted to alternate vegetation (current 100K for lawn and irrigation), and $100K for addition vegetation transformations Landscape Maintenance Contract Completing bid packet for contract 25,000.00 $ 68,000.00 Maintenance for Greater Ave and 900 South (1/2) including mulch and gravel. Line items in Stormwater, Water, and WR for additional sites Landscape Repairs $25,000.00 For unanticipated irrigation and landscape repairs. 900 South Wetland $60,000.00 To remediate damage to site due to unauthorized occupancy Licensing Fees 51701 $ 26,398.00 GardenSoft 2500 $ 2,500.00 License, upgrades, maintenance AWE Home Audit 7500 $ 7,500.00 License, upgrades, maintenance CII Tool Service and Upgrades 12,798 $ 12,798.00 License, upgrades, maintenance (FY21/22 paid thru Scotts Grant) This is not currently under contract and there has been no expenditure. AWE Sales Force Platform 3600 $ 3600.00 Platform to support rebate programs. Small tools and Equipment 51701 500 (also cii audit kits) $ 500.00 Hand tools, audit supplies (measuring cups, flow gauges, etc) Memberships 51701 2300 $ 2,500.00 AWE, UWCF In City Conventions and Workshops 51701 500 $ 500.00 Out of town travel 51701 3500 $ 3500.00 Typically WaterSMART Innovations SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-16 APPENDICES F. 17.16.092: W ATER S HORTAGE M ANAGEMENT P OLICY A. Declaration Of Policy: Given the prevailing semiarid climate of the region, the limited water resources available to Salt Lake City, and the vitally important role an adequate supply of municipal and industrial (M&I) water plays in maintaining a healthy and safe environment in the community, it is hereby declared to be the policy of Salt Lake City that, during times of water shortage caused by drought, facilities failure or any other condition or event, M&I water usage within the city's water service area shall be managed, regulated, prioritized and restricted in such a manner as to prevent the wasteful or unreasonable use of water, and to preserve at all times an adequate supply of M&I water for essential uses. B. Water Shortage Contingency Plan: The director of the department of public utilities shall cause to be prepared and implemented a water shortage contingency plan (the "plan"). Such plan may be included as part of, or prepared separately from, the water conservation master plan provided for in section 73-10-32, Utah Code Annotated, and shall be revised from time to time as conditions and circumstances warrant. The plan shall, among other things: 1) establish graduated stages of water shortage severity, and 2) establish appropriate M&I water use restriction response measures for each stage. The plan shall include guidelines and criteria for determining the appropriate stage to be implemented under various water supply, delivery, and demand conditions. Each plan stage of water shortage, and the accompanying use restrictions, shall be implemented by declaration of the mayor, upon the advice and recommendation of the director pursuant to the plan guidelines. C. Compliance: Compliance with the water use restriction response measures called for under any applicable plan stage may be either recommended or mandatory, as specified in the plan. The plan may not provide for mandatory restrictions on residential or commercial customers until either: 1) the projected water supply from all sources is sixty percent (60%) or less of the average annual water supply, or 2) the director otherwise determines that, in the exercise of his or her best professional judgment, the city is unable to meet anticipated essential water needs without implementing such mandatory measures. D. Enforcement: The director shall enforce compliance with all mandatory response measures set forth in the plan through the imposition and collection of civil fines, as provided in section 17.16.792 of this chapter. Nothing herein or in section 17.16.792 of this chapter shall prevent the city from exercising any other available means, either in law or equity, of enforcing compliance with the plan. E. Plan Nonexclusive: The creation and implementation of the plan shall be in addition to, and not exclusive of, any other steps taken by the city from time to time to conserve water or manage limited water supplies, including mayoral proclamations issued pursuant to section 17.16.080 of this chapter. (Ord. 50-03 § 1, 2003) SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-17 APPENDICES G. S ALT L AKE C ITY C ODE 21A -48 -055 W ATER E FFICIENT L ANDSCAPING S TANDARDS Link to most current code: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/saltlakecityut/latest/saltlakecity_ut /0-0-0-70284 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-18 APPENDICES H. P UBLIC U TILITY A DVISORY C OMMITTEE M INUTES /W ATER C ONSERVATION P LAN D ISCUSSION SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-19 APPENDICES I. M INUTES OF THE M EETING OF THE OF THE M ETROPOLITAN W ATER D ISTRICT OF S ALT L AKE & S ANDY B OARD M INUTES /W ATER C ONSERVATION P LAN SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-20 APPENDICES J. M INUTES OF THE S ALT L AKE C ITY C OUNCIL F ORMAL M EETING SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-21 APPENDICES K. S ALT L AKE C ITY C OUNCIL T RANSMITTAL , M INUTES , AND R ESOLUTION SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-22 APPENDICES L. M36 W ATER A UDIT S UMMARIES 69,5 2 3 90 428 3,556 8036 Billed M e t e r e d C o n s u m p t i o n ( B M A C ) Bille d U n m e t e r e d C o n s u m p t i o n ( B U A C ) * Unbil l e d M e t e r e d C o n s u m p t i o n ( U M A C ) Unbi l l e d U n m e t e r e d C o n s u m p t i o n ( U U A C ) Wate r E x P o r t e d Water U n a c c o u n t e d F o r Water and Loss Control Audit THE WATER AND LOSS CONTROL AUDIT IS A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF HOW WATER IS ACCOUNTED FOR IN SALT LAKE CITY’S CULINARY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. S A L T L A K E C I T Y ’ S W A T E R : TOTAL SYSTEM INPUT: 81,633 AC-FT TOTAL WATER USAGE ACCOUNTED FOR: 73,597 AC-FT TOTAL WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR: 8,036 AC-FT WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?AND WHERE DOES IT GO? As part of the City’s overall conservation efforts, understanding how water is accounted for is a priority. An audit was completed using methodology established in Manual M36 – Water Audits and Loss Control Programs from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Completing this audit will help the City understand the performance of their water system and what inefficiencies may be present. The audit also helps estimate the revenue impacts of identified system losses and develops recommended actions to reduce losses. Treatment Plants (City Creek, Parleys, Big Cottonwood) Unbilled Unmetered Consumption (UUAC) Wells Water Unaccounted For Water Exported Tunnels and Springs Unbilled Metered Consumption (UMAC) MWDSLS Wholesale Purchases MWDLS Wholesale Purchases 42,666 AC-FT Billed Accounts 69,523 AC-FT Unbilled Accounts 90 AC-FT Water Used for Maintenance 428 AC-FT Water Unaccounted For 8,036 AC-FT Water Exported to Holliday Water & Others 3,556 AC-FTTreatment Plants 33,907 AC-FT 16 Wells 3,869 AC-FT Tunnels & Springs 1,191 AC-FT Billed Metered Consumption (BMAC) WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR IS EQUAL TO THE VOLUME USED BY 14,000 RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS 2022 DATA SET Meter & Data Handling Losses Other LossesNon-Revenue Water HOW VALID IS SALT LAKE CITY’S DATA? HOW DO SALT LAKE CITY SYSTEM LOSSES COMPARE TO OTHER SYSTEMS? Performance Indicator When compared to available AWWA data, SLC is about at the 75th percentile for system loss. This would suggest that SLC is performing poorly. However, it should be clarified that this percentile is based on an AWWA data set consisting of only entities with a Level 1 validated water audit. As a result, the data being used for comparison is coming from entities that have had several years to minimize water loss and work on developing high quality data. Many of these utilities provide indoor water only and consequently have much smaller systems (per capita) than SLC. For comparison, a target goal for system losses of 8 percent (a good initial goal for utilities beginning to work on reducing system loss) has been added to the data comparison graphic. As can be seen, this target ends up around the 60th percentile, verifying the aggressive nature of the AWWA dataset. 90th %ile 90th %ile 90th %ile10th %ile 10th %ile 10th %ileUnit Total Losses:Unit Apparent Losses:Unit Other Losses: 75 th % i l e SLC Goal 75 th % i l e 75 th % i l e Med i a n Med i a n Med i a n 25th %ile 25th %ile 25th %ile 85.1 gal/conn/day 26.5 gal/conn/day 58.6 gal/conn/day Data Validity Score: 67 See Loss Control Planning for Tier Details Tier I (≤25) Tier II (26-50)Tier III (51-70) Tier IV (71-90) Tier V (91-100) Data Validity Tier: Tier III (51-70) Data Validity SLC Goal SLC GoalCurrent SLC Losses Current SLC Losses Current SLC Losses Result is above 90th %ile Result is above 90th %ile What does that mean? Once data was gathered and input into the AWWA software, a data scoring matrix was completed to give SLC a sense of this audit’s data validity. Data gradings are user-selected ratings of the validity—or trustworthiness—of the individual volumetric and system data inputs. SLC’s data validity score (DVS) was calculated to be 65/100, thus landing in Tier III, an intermediate level of data validity. At this level, AWWA indicates that the data is sufficiently trustworthy that an entity may begin to launch loss control interventions in specific areas, use performance indicators to track its ongoing loss control performance, and compare its data with other water utilities. Despite this moderate data validity score, there are still some reservations about the City’s data. Most of these reservations center on the City’s metering data. During the audit process there was some difficulty pulling consistent data from the City’s system. On several occasions, it was discovered that the data included multiple duplicate records or was missing records provided as part of previous requests. The database is also missing clear identifiers of certain important types of water use. Improving the documentation of records will allow the City to have more confidence in the remainder of the conclusions contained here. WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL VALUE OF UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY? Unknown Losses Total Volume of Unaccounted For Water = 8,554 AC-FT/YR Total Value of Unaccounted For Water = $6,389,058/YR Vo l u m e ( A C - F T / Y R ) Co s t ( D o l l a r s ) Unauthorized Consumption Systematic Data Handling Errors Meter & Data Handling Losses Basis of Valuation*Volume AC-FT/YR Value $/YR Other LossesNon-Revenue Water Unbilled Unmetered Authorized Consumption Metering Inaccuracies Unknown Losses Including System Leaks 5,535 AC-FT Systematic Data Handling Errors 174 AC-FT Water Theft 174 AC-FT Metering Inaccuracies 2,153 AC-FT U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R C O M P O N E N T S S U M M A R Y UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY HAS A VALUE OF ABOUT $6 MILLION. ALTHOUGH ONLY A PORTION OF THIS REPRESENTS REAL WATER THAT CAN BE RECOVERED, THIS IS STILL A SUBSTANTIAL ASSET THAT SHOULD BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $0 2,501 $2,586,947 6,053 $3,802,111 8,554 $6,389,058 CRUC VPCBlended U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R *Based on Customer Retail Unit Charge (CRUC) or Variable Production Cost (VPC) per AWWA M36 methodology. Apparent Losses 27% Water Theft 2% Systematic Data Handling Errors 2% Real Losses 69% Apparent Losses Water Theft Systematic Data Handling Errors Real Losses 1 The number of stars (“ *”) indicate the relative potential impact the recommendation could have on reducing losses in the SLCDPU system. The more stars, the greater the potential impact. WHAT CAN SALT LAKE CITY DO TO REDUCE WATER LOSSES? A number of potential actions have been identified to make improvement relative to the system audit. This includes potential actions in three separate categories: gathering improved data to provide better understanding of system losses, improving processes to increase confidence in the validity of the collected data, and making physical improvements to minimize real losses in the system. Potential impact on both real and apparent losses, relative cost, and priority for the City to implement the actions are summarized below. Our hope is that this information will provide a better understanding of the water system loss control in the Salt Lake City culinary water distribution system. If you have questions about the information in this document, or if you just want to know more, please drop us a note at stephanie.duer@slcgov. com. 1545 E 14075 S 801.495.2224 Draper UT, 84020 wwww.bowencollins.com Water and Loss Control Audit THE WATER AND LOSS CONTROL AUDIT IS A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF HOW WATER IS ACCOUNTED FOR IN SALT LAKE CITY’S CULINARY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. S A L T L A K E C I T Y ’ S W A T E R : TOTAL SYSTEM INPUT:83,813 AC-FT TOTAL WATER USAGE ACCOUNTED FOR: 75,731 AC-FT TOTAL WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR: 8,082 AC-FT WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?AND WHERE DOES IT GO? As part of the City’s overall conservation efforts, understanding how water is accounted for is a priority. An audit was completed using methodology established in Manual M36 – Water Audits and Loss Control Programs from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Completing this audit will help the City understand the performance of their water system and what inefficiencies may be present. The audit also helps estimate the revenue impacts of identified system losses and develops recommended actions to reduce losses. Treatment Plants (City Creek, Parleys, Big Cottonwood)Unbilled Unmetered Consumption (UUAC) Wells Water Unaccounted For Water Exported Tunnels and Springs Unbilled Metered Consumption (UMAC) MWDSLS Wholesale Purchases MWDSLS Wholesale Purchases 37,344 AC-FT Billed Accounts 69,134 AC-FT Unbilled Accounts 800 AC-FT Water Used for Maintenance 2,500 AC-FT Water Unaccounted For 8,082 AC-FT Water Exported to Holliday Water & Others 3,116 AC-FT Treatment Plants 39,422 AC-FT 16 Wells 4,362 AC-FT Tunnels & Springs 2,684 AC-FT Billed Metered Consumption (BMAC) WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR IS EQUAL TO THE VOLUME USED BY 14,100 RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS 2023 DATA SET Billed Unmetered Consumption (BUAC)(0) Meter & Data Handling Losses Other Losses Non-Revenue Water HOW DO SALT LAKE CITY SYSTEM LOSSES COMPARE TO OTHER SYSTEMS? Performance Indicator When compared to available AWWA data, SLC is about at the 75th percentile for system loss. This would suggest that SLC is performing poorly. However, it should be clarified that this percentile is based on an AWWA data set consisting of only entities with a Level 1 validated water audit. As a result, the data being used for comparison is coming from entities that have had several years to minimize water loss and work on developing high quality data. Many of these utilities provide indoor water only and consequently have much smaller systems (per capita) than SLC. For comparison, a target goal for system losses of 8 percent (a good initial goal for utilities beginning to work on reducing system loss) has been added to the data comparison graphic. As can be seen, this target ends up around the 60th percentile, verifying the aggressive nature of the AWWA dataset. Unit Total Losses:Unit Apparent Losses:Unit Other Losses:81.4 gal/conn/day 25.3 gal/conn/day 56.1 gal/conn/day 90th %ile 90th %ile 90th %ile10th %ile 10th %ile 10th %ile 75 th % i l e 75 th % i l e 75 th % i l e Med i a n Med i a n Med i a n 25th %il e 25th %ile 25th %ile Result is above 90th %ile SLC Goal Current SLC Losses SLC Goal & Current Losses SLC G o a l Current SLC Losses HOW VALID IS SALT LAKE CITY’S DATA? Data Validity Score: 64 See Loss Control Planning for Tier Details Tier I (≤25) Tier II (26-50)Tier III (51-70) Tier IV (71-90) Tier V (91-100) Data Validity Tier: Tier III (51-70) Data ValidityWhat does that mean? Once data was gathered and input into the AWWA software, a data scoring matrix was completed to give SLC a sense of this audit’s data validity. Data gradings are user-selected ratings of the validity—or trustworthiness—of the individual volumetric and system data inputs. SLC’s data validity score (DVS) was calculated to be 65/100, thus landing in Tier III, an intermediate level of data validity. At this level, AWWA indicates that the data is sufficiently trustworthy that an entity may begin to launch loss control interventions in specific areas, use performance indicators to track its ongoing loss control performance, and compare its data with other water utilities. Despite this moderate data validity score, there are still some reservations about the City’s data. Most of these reservations center on the City’s metering data. During the audit process there was some difficulty pulling consistent data from the City’s system. On several occasions, it was discovered that the data included multiple duplicate records or was missing records provided as part of previous requests. The database is also missing clear identifiers of certain important types of water use. Improving the documentation of records will allow the City to have more confidence in the remainder of the conclusions contained here. WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL VALUE OF UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY? Total Volume of NRW = 11,357 ACRE-FT/YR Total COST OF NRW = $8,607,563/YR Meter & Data Handling Losses Basis of Valuation* Volume AC-FT/YR Value $/YR Other Losses Non-Revenue Water U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R C O M P O N E N T S S U M M A R Y UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY HAS A VALUE OF ABOUT $8.6 MILLION. ALTHOUGH ONLY A PORTION OF THIS REPRESENTS REAL WATER THAT CAN BE RECOVERED, THIS IS STILL A SUBSTANTIAL ASSET THAT SHOULD BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD. 2,509 $2,699,730 8,873 $5,907,832 11,382 $8,607,562 CRUC VPC Blended U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R *Based on Customer Retail Unit Charge (CRUC) or Variable Production Cost (VPC) per AWWA M36 methodology. Unknown Losses Including System Leaks 5,573 AC-FT Systematic Data Handling Errors 173 AC-FT Water Theft 173 AC-FT Metering Inaccuracies 2,163 AC-FT Vo l u m e ( A C - F T / Y R ) Co s t ( D o l l a r s ) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 Real Losses Unauthorized Consumption Systematic Data Handling Errors Unbilled Metered Authorized Cons. Customer Metering Inaccuracies NRW Components Summary Unbilled Unmetered Auth. Cons. 1 The number of stars (“ *”) indicate the relative potential impact the recommendation could have on reducing losses in the SLCDPU system. The more stars, the greater the potential impact. WHAT CAN SALT LAKE CITY DO TO REDUCE WATER LOSSES? A number of potential actions have been identified to make improvement relative to the system audit. This includes potential actions in three separate categories: gathering improved data to provide better understanding of system losses, improving processes to increase confidence in the validity of the collected data, and making physical improvements to minimize real losses in the system. Potential impact on both real and apparent losses, relative cost, and priority for the City to implement the actions are summarized below. Our hope is that this information will provide a better understanding of the water system loss control in the Salt Lake City culinary water distribution system. If you have questions about the information in this document, or if you just want to know more, please drop us a note at stephanie.duer@slcgov.com. 1545 E 14075 S 801.495.2224 Draper UT, 84020 www.bowencollins.com Water and Loss Control Audit THE WATER AND LOSS CONTROL AUDIT IS A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF HOW WATER IS ACCOUNTED FOR IN SALT LAKE CITY’S CULINARY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. S A L T L A K E C I T Y ’ S W A T E R : TOTAL SYSTEM INPUT:89,939 AC-FT TOTAL WATER USAGE ACCOUNTED FOR: 81,517 AC-FT TOTAL WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR: 8,423 AC-FT WHERE DOES IT COME FROM?AND WHERE DOES IT GO? As part of the City’s overall conservation efforts, understanding how water is accounted for is a priority. An audit was completed using methodology established in Manual M36 – Water Audits and Loss Control Programs from the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Completing this audit will help the City understand the performance of their water system and what inefficiencies may be present. The audit also helps estimate the revenue impacts of identified system losses and develops recommended actions to reduce losses. Treatment Plants (City Creek, Parleys, Big Cottonwood) Wells Tunnels and Springs MWDSLS Wholesale Purchases MWDSLS Wholesale Purchases 50,803 AC-FT Treatment Plants 33,525 AC-FT 16 Wells 3,322 AC-FT Tunnels & Springs 2,290 AC-FT WATER UNACCOUNTED FOR IS EQUAL TO THE VOLUME USED BY 14,600 RESIDENTIAL HOUSEHOLDS 2024 DATA SET Unbilled Unmetered Consumption (UUAC) Water Unaccounted For Water Exported Unbilled Metered Consumption (UMAC) Billed Accounts 75,251 AC-FT Unbilled Accounts 650 AC-FT Water Used for Maintenance 2,000 AC-FT Water Unaccounted For 8,423 AC-FT Water Exported to Holliday Water & Others 3,417 AC-FT Billed Metered Consumption (BMAC) Billed Unmetered Consumption (BUAC)(0) Meter & Data Handling Losses Other Losses Non-Revenue Water HOW DO SALT LAKE CITY SYSTEM LOSSES COMPARE TO OTHER SYSTEMS? Performance Indicator When compared to available AWWA data, SLC is about at the 75th percentile for system loss. This would suggest that SLC is performing poorly. However, it should be clarified that this percentile is based on an AWWA data set consisting of only entities with a Level 1 validated water audit. As a result, the data being used for comparison is coming from entities that have had several years to minimize water loss and work on developing high quality data. Many of these utilities provide indoor water only and consequently have much smaller systems (per capita) than SLC. For comparison, a target goal for system losses of 8 percent (a good initial goal for utilities beginning to work on reducing system loss) has been added to the data comparison graphic. As can be seen, this target ends up around the 60th percentile, verifying the aggressive nature of the AWWA dataset. 90th %ile 90th %ile10th %ile 10th %ile Unit Total Losses:Unit Apparent Losses:Unit Other Losses: 75 th % i l e 75 th %il e Med i a n 25th %il e 25th %ile 87.7 gal/conn/day 28.4 gal/conn/day 59.4 gal/conn/day Result is above 90th %ile SL C G o a l Current SLC Losses SLC Goal & Current Losses Med i a n 90th %ile10th %ile 75 th % i l e Med i a n 25th %ile SLC G o a l Current SLC Losses HOW VALID IS SALT LAKE CITY’S DATA? Data Validity Score: 66 See Loss Control Planning for Tier Details Tier I (≤25) Tier II (26-50)Tier III (51-70) Tier IV (71-90) Tier V (91-100) Data Validity Tier: Tier III (51-70) Data ValidityWhat does that mean? Once data was gathered and input into the AWWA software, a data scoring matrix was completed to give SLC a sense of this audit’s data validity. Data gradings are user-selected ratings of the validity—or trustworthiness—of the individual volumetric and system data inputs. SLC’s data validity score (DVS) was calculated to be 65/100, thus landing in Tier III, an intermediate level of data validity. At this level, AWWA indicates that the data is sufficiently trustworthy that an entity may begin to launch loss control interventions in specific areas, use performance indicators to track its ongoing loss control performance, and compare its data with other water utilities. Despite this moderate data validity score, there are still some reservations about the City’s data. Most of these reservations center on the City’s metering data. During the audit process there was some difficulty pulling consistent data from the City’s system. On several occasions, it was discovered that the data included multiple duplicate records or was missing records provided as part of previous requests. The database is also missing clear identifiers of certain important types of water use. Improving the documentation of records will allow the City to have more confidence in the remainder of the conclusions contained here. WHAT IS THE POTENTIAL VALUE OF UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY? Real Losses Unauthorized Consumption Systematic Data Handling Errors Meter & Data Handling Losses Basis of Valuation* Volume AC-FT/YR Value $/YR Other Losses Non-Revenue Water Unbilled Unmetered Auth. Cons. Unbilled Metered Authorized Cons. Customer Metering Inaccuracies Unknown Losses Including System Leaks 5,699 AC-FT Systematic Data Handling Errors 188 AC-FT Water Theft 188 AC-FT Metering Inaccuracies 2,347 AC-FT U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R C O M P O N E N T S S U M M A R Y UNACCOUNTED FOR WATER IN SALT LAKE CITY HAS A VALUE OF ABOUT $9 MILLION. ALTHOUGH ONLY A PORTION OF THIS REPRESENTS REAL WATER THAT CAN BE RECOVERED, THIS IS STILL A SUBSTANTIAL ASSET THAT SHOULD BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD. 2,724 $3,511,795 8,349 $5,836,479 11,073 $9,348,274 CRUC VPCBlended U N A C C O U N T E D F O R W A T E R *Based on Customer Retail Unit Charge (CRUC) or Variable Production Cost (VPC) per AWWA M36 methodology. Total Volume of NRW = 11,052 ACRE-FT/YR Total COST OF NRW = $9,348,274/YR Vo l u m e ( A c r e - F T / Y R ) Co s t ( D o l l a r s ) 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 NRW Components Summary 1 The number of stars (“ *”) indicate the relative potential impact the recommendation could have on reducing losses in the SLCDPU system. The more stars, the greater the potential impact. WHAT CAN SALT LAKE CITY DO TO REDUCE WATER LOSSES? A number of potential actions have been identified to make improvement relative to the system audit. This includes potential actions in three separate categories: gathering improved data to provide better understanding of system losses, improving processes to increase confidence in the validity of the collected data, and making physical improvements to minimize real losses in the system. Potential impact on both real and apparent losses, relative cost, and priority for the City to implement the actions are summarized below. Our hope is that this information will provide a better understanding of the water system loss control in the Salt Lake City culinary water distribution system. If you have questions about the information in this document, or if you just want to know more, please drop us a note at stephanie.duer@slcgov.com. 1545 E 14075 S 801.495.2224 Draper UT, 84020 www.bowencollins.com SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-23 APPENDICES M. SLCDPU D ROUGHT C ONTINGENCY P LAN SUMMARY plan summary drought & water shortage contingency plan Understanding the potential impact of drought on the Salt Lake City water supply and establishing a plan to meet customer needs during periods of drought and water shortage. The Wasatch Front has experienced several drought periods over the past 100 years with typical drought periods extending between 3-5 years. In more recent decades, the frequency and intensity of drought has increased with 2021 being an Exceptional Drought year (highest category of drought conditions) for the area according to the National Integrated Drought Information System. Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) recognizes that it has become increasingly important to protect current water sources, plan for future water supply during periods of drought and other water shortage, and improve water reliability. Water shortage may result from a variety of circumstances such as climate change, regular climate variability, water supply contamination, system disruption or interruption, and even unanticipated surges in demand. This Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan is intended as a guide for monitoring, measuring, mitigating, and responding to water supply shortages or disruptions as a result of any of these or other scenarios. DROUGHT AND WATER SHORTAGE PLAN COMPONENTS This drought and water shortage plan consists of four major components. WATER SHORTAGE MONITORING & STAGES Monitoring is needed to detect early warning signs of water shortage and includes indicators such as precipitation defecits, high temperatures, water storage reductions, and low runoff flows. WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE Water storage triggers and stages are developed to identify when projected supplies reach levels where response actions are needed. PUBLIC OUTREACH Response actions are near immediate behaviors triggered by defined water shortage stages with the goal of effecting quick water use reductions. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION To make the City’s supply as reliable as possible, vulnerabilities were assessed and mitigation actions were developed to minimize the potential for impact of each water supply vulnerability. Table 1: Water Shortage Triggers Stage Projected Available Supply as a Percent of Demand Projected Available Stream Flow Yield as a Percent of Historical Average Stage 1 - Watch >100 but NIDIS indicates Drought 87 - 100% Stage 2 - Mild 94 - 100%<87% Stage 3 - Moderate 86 - 94%- Stage 4 - Severe 76 - 86%- Stage 5 - Critical <76%- water shortage MONITORING & STAGES WATER SHORTAGE MONITORING & SUPPLY VULNERABILITY The purpose of water shortage monitoring is to assess and determine projected surface and ground water supply, available storage water volumes, and current and projected water demand in order to predict times of water shortage and initiate response efforts when necessary. It should be emphasized that SLCDPU staff have been tracking and evaluating drought and water shortage for many years. SLCDPU has a number of supplies that contribute to its overall water portfolio and that are included in the City’s water shortage monitoring process. These supplies are shown in Figure 1 along with a typical year’s production. While we may think water supply shortages only relate to drought, each of the supplies shown in Figure 1 is vulnerable to water shortages caused by climate change, water supply contamination, system disruption or interruption, etc. Because of these vulnerabilities, it is important that each supply is continually monitored and measured to ensure that the City’s demands can be met. If a water shortage is determined, then demand reduction efforts will be needed. Figure 1: Typical Year Supply Figure 2: Water Shortage Stages WATER SHORTAGE TRIGGERS & STAGES Water shortage monitoring results can be used to establish and implement water shortage triggers and stages. SLCDPU’s water shortage stages are primarily defined based on projected available supply as a percent of demand. These stages are summarized in Figure 2 and Table 1. As shown in Table 1, a secondary criterion has been included for when stream flows are below average. This criterion is needed for dry years in which storage or other source water may be available to meet demands but management of demand is prudent to prepare for potential extended drought. Stage 5 ‐Critical Stage 4 ‐Severe Stage 3 ‐Moderate Stage 2 ‐Mild Stage 1 ‐Watch 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Pe r c e n t a g e  of  Av a i l a b l e  Su p p l y  to  De m a n d water shortage RESPONSE PLAN The City has identified actions at each level needed to achieve reductions in demand that will ensure water is available for users in times of shortage. The recommended actions for each water shortage level for outdoor and indoor water use are summarized below. Water Shortage Stages Daily Reduction Goal Water Shortage Response Summary: Outdoors Water Shortage Response Summary: Indoors Single Family Homes Commercial, Industrial,  Other Institutional, Business, Multi-Family, & HOAs Parks, Golf, Schools, & other Government Facilities Single Family Homes (per household) Commercial, Industrial,  Other Institutional, Business, Multi-Family, & HOAs (percentage across all customers) Parks, Golf, Schools, & other Government Facilities (percentage across all customers) Stage 1 – Watch Avoid Entering Mild Stage • Avoid wasting water • Avoid wasting water • Adhere to best practices • Avoid wasting water • Avoid wasting water • Reduce indoor use by 5% Stage 2 – Mild 10 mgd • Water lawn less often • Water lawn less often • Adhere to best practices • Required to adhere to budget • No lawn watering between 8 AM & 8 PM • Voluntary reduce average gallons per house hold by 3 gallons per day (2%) • Voluntary reduce indoor use by 5% • Reduce indoor use by 10% Stage 3 – Moderate 25 mgd • Water no more than two times per week • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: Adherence to water budget for irrigation-only meters • Water no more than two times per week • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: Adherence to water budget for irrigation-only meters • Adhere to best practices • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: Reduce outdoor water use by 15% • Reduce average gallons per house hold by 8 gallons per day (5%) • Reduce indoor use by 10% • Reduce indoor use by 14% Stage 4 – Severe 40 mgd • Water no more than one time per week • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: 25% reduction of water budget • Water no more than one time per week • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: 25% reduction of water budget • Adhere to best practices • No lawn watering between 8 AM and 8 PM • Mandatory: Reduce outdoor water use by 25% • Reduce average gallons per house hold by 11 gallons per day (7.5%) • Reduce indoor use by 16% • Reduce indoor use by 21% Stage 5 – Critical 65 mgd • Lawn watering prohibited • No new landscapes • No filling pools, jacuzzies, or hot tubs, etc. • Lawn watering prohibited • No new landscapes • Reduce consumption by at least 35% • Lawn watering not allowed without permit • No new landscapes • Reduce average gallons per house hold by 15 gallons per day (10%) • Reduce indoor use by 21% • Reduce indoor use by 28% Should greater reduction be necessary within a stage, more actions may be required than indicated. For specific guidelines to achieve necessary reductions visit slc.gov/utilities/conservation Vulnerability definitions and impacts associated with each were assessed along with consideration of issues such as probability of occurrence, magnitude of effect on water supply, cost of consequence, and potential mitigations. . MITIGATION ACTIONS: Mitigation actions will become the foundation of the City’s plan to prepare for and respond to future water shortages For each vulnerability included in the categories discussed above, one or more mitigation actions were identified that may be used by SLCDPU to help protect its service area against water shortage. Mitigation activities the City is pursuing to minimize water shortage vulnerabilities are summarized on the City’s conservation website at www.slcgov.com/conservation. Below are a few examples of City Projects that have been completed to help protect against water supply vulnerabilities. PLAN EXECUTION VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION Beyond defining water shortage responses, this plan has also proactively looked for ways to reduce the City’s vulnerability to drought and other water shortages. PUBLIC OUTREACH Notifying and educating SLC water users is critical to the success of this Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan. To do this efficiently and effectively, SLC will email customers and send out flyers in the mail requesting voluntary water reduction. Additionally, SLC will request reductions via social media, on their website, and various other digital platforms. WATERSHED PROTECTION GREATER AVENUES WATER CONSERVATION DEMONSTRATION GARDEN Executing the plan will be under the direction of the SLCDPU Director and will occur in three basic steps: WATER SHORTAGE MONITORING STAGE IDENTIFICATION & DECLARATION In order to protect the City’s water supply, the Director will lead efforts to notify the community of the water shortage stage and inform them of ways that they can conserve water and contribute to the success of this plan. The Director uses drought monitoring tools and water supply data to determine if the City is experiencing a water shortage. Once a water shortage is determined, the Director and Mayor will identify and declare which water shortage stage the City is experiencing and required response actions. COMMUNICATION & OUTREACH 1 2 3 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: Several potential water supply vulnerabilities were identified and assembled into the following five categories: • Surface Water Vulnerabilities • Well Water Vulnerabilities • Transmission Vulnerabilities • Increased Water Demand Vulnerabilities • Drought Consequences SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-24 APPENDICES N. I MPACTS OF W ATER C ONSERVATION ON R ATES T ECHNICAL M EMORANDUM , 2025 Below are excerpts from the technical memo: Introduction The 2025 update to the water conservation plan for Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU or the Utility), in combination with recent consumer water rate increases, has created interest in the relationship between water conservation and cons umer water rates. SLCDPU asked Bowen Collins & Associates (BC&A) to complete an analysis to understand this relationship and document our findings in this technical memo. The purpose of this analysis and technical memo is to understand the economic impacts of water conservation on water service and consumer water rates. Methodology Conservation can result in both upward and downward pressure on water rates: • Upward Pressure on Rates – A common complaint about conservation from rate payers is often voiced in this way, “The problem I have with conservation is that, if I am successful in reducing my water use, it results in less revenue for the utility. To make up for lost revenue, the utility then raises my rates. I feel like I am being punished for doing a good job at conserving.” There is some truth to this complaint. Every utility has significant costs that are fixed, regardless of water treated and delivered. Beyond normal utility fixed costs, operating a conservation program within a utility introduces additional fixed costs to the system. When conservation results in less water deliveries, these costs must still be paid for. This means that the average unit cost of water ($/gallon) must increase to account for the lower sales. However, this is only half the picture. • Downward Pressure on Rates – Often less obvious but equally important is the downward pressure conservation has on rates. While some of the Utility’s costs are fixed, other costs increase in proportion to demands in the system. Especially in areas such as Salt Lake City where water resources are scarce, water costs can increase significantly as demands increase. This includes increases in water supply and infrastructure costs. Thus, the challenge of this study becomes to define the magnitude of each of these factors and understand which has a greater impact on rates overall: • Calculating upward pressure on rates can be done relatively easily. Historical annual costs can be adjusted by inflation and then divided by total water sales and/or total ERUs. The resulting unit costs can then be compared from year to year to understand how conservation has increased costs. • Calculating downward pressure on rates is more difficult. This is because it requires calculating avoided costs which (by definition) can’t be directly measured. However, the City does have several tools that can provide a reasonable estimate of these costs including its existing water system model and an understanding of alternative water costs. Once avoided costs are calculated, they can be added to observed costs and then divided by projected sales without conservation to calculate unit costs without conservation. These costs can then be compared to unit costs with conservation to understand the overall impact of conservation on rates. For this study, water rate impacts will be calculated for observed conservation from 2000 to 2024 and project conservation moving forward based on the Utility’s conservation goals. The details of these calculations are summarized in the following sections. Conclusions The analysis described in the technical memo has allowed us to estimate the economic impact of water conservation on water services and consumer water rates. Below is a summary of our conclusions: • Conservation saves the Utility (and therefore customers) money over time by reducing the cost to supply, store, and convey water to consumers. • It is estimated that, between 2000 and 2025, conservation resulted in $468 million in savings to SLCDPU, and that the cumulative savings between 2026 and 2060 will be approximately $1.29 billion. • For a typical residential household in 2025, these cost savings result in an average monthly bill that is approximately $34/month less than it would be without conservation. SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-25 APPENDICES O. W ATER C ONSERVATION P ROGRAM M ANAGER J OB D ESCRIPTION 12:20 PM 07/17/2025 Page 1 of 5 Overview Overview Inactive No View As Of 07/17/2025 Date of Last Change 02/15/2024 07:20:04.091 PM Job Profile Name Water Conservation Program Manager Job Code 002784 Include Job Code in Name No Job Profile Summary Reporting to the Water Resource Manager, incumbent plans, develops, organizes, coordinates and executes department water conservation programs and activities. Regularly interfaces with outside agencies, media, and consultants. Provides technical expertise and assistance in landscaping, irrigation, residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional water use and other approaches to cultivate and foster water conservation. Develops and coordinates dissemination of public education information and materials. Regularly represents the Department at public meetings, technical conferences, and at local, State, and regional stakeholder workshops, panels, etc. TYPICAL DUTIES: Working with department leadership, plans and implements the department’s water conservation program.  Monitors water- use records and evaluates program effectiveness. Collects, analyzes, interprets and presents information on water conservation activities to department management, local community leaders, elected officials, special interest groups and customers. Recommends program direction responsive to landscape, horticulture, commercial and industrial needs. • Researches and reports up-to-date information regarding current legislation and/or ordinances related to water conservation issues.  Organizes and coordinates a volunteer docent program, workshops, promotional activities, educational tours, and field days to teach and encourage appropriate water conservation methods.  Coordinates development of interpretive signs and printed informational materials to reflect proper gardening, landscape and conservation program objectives. Attends and/or participates in meetings and represents the department on water conservation issues.  Acts as coordinator to and advisor for citizen advisory committees on special projects pertaining to water conservation issues and program initiatives. • Develops educational and informational brochures, articles, and other media. Provides input for water conservation web site and assists in page maintenance.  Coordinates activities with other city departments in providing public information programs, including presentations covering general conservation, residential and commercial programs to schools, civics and other groups. Works with other city departments in developing and implementing water conservation best practices. • Drafts correspondence on behalf of the Department regarding water-conservation-related inquiries and policies.  Attends, participates, or conducts meetings representing the Department to the public on a variety of issues. Conducts research to provide information essential for staff decision making on critical issues and existing programs. Assists in the preparation of the Department annual report. Assists in the development of materials for the Department web page and assists in page maintenance. • Reviews interim and final reports for water conservation projects submitted by outside agencies and makes recommendations.  Oversees development and administration of a certification program for commercial and industrial • Job Description 12:20 PM 07/17/2025 Page 2 of 5 customers in conjunction with specialists in the community. Assists in development and implementation of model water conservation ordinances.  Works with outside agencies and City planning departments in providing training and support for staff, contractors and residents. Assists in research, testing and reporting of new water conservation technologies and joint projects with other agencies and universities.  Monitors and advises on landscape conservation research, including research on water conserving plants.  Interfaces with others in commercial, industrial, institutional and residential water conservation projects.  Participates in pre and post field verifications of landscape water conservation projects.  Provides technical review and assistance in landscape water conservation project design and development, and in particular the use of advanced irrigation technology and incentive programs.  Reviews irrigation design documents, specifications and ordinances. • Hires, trains, and supervises seasonal, intern or other conservation program staff as needed. Conducts internal training programs to enhance customer service related to water conservation. • Assists in the preparation of annual budget and updates to the department’s conservation plan.• Performs other duties as assigned.• MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Bachelor’s degree from an accredited university in landscape architecture, horticulture, plant or water sciences, environmental planning, education, public relations or related field.  Four years’ job-related, paid experience, including two years in public relations type work.  • Advanced knowledge of horticulture principles, plant identification, irrigation design, and water-conserving landscaping practices.  Also, considerable knowledge of basic conservation methods and techniques, including related engineering, mathematical and economic analytical methods.  • Ability to apply common sense, analyze data and interpret results yielding varying outcomes.  Ability to communicate and interact effectively with the public, and with employees and representatives of both inside and outside agencies.  Ability to operate basic office machines such as computers, copiers, adding machines, printers, phones, and fax. • Demonstrated ability to exercise independent judgment and make sound, logical, well thought out decisions.• Possession of a valid driver’s license or driving privilege card.•  Must be able to obtain within 6 months of hire the Irrigation Landscape Auditor certification as administered by the International Irrigation Association.  • WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is generally performed in a comfortable office environment.  Frequent sitting, walking, standing, stooping and lifting of light to moderately heavy weights.  Frequent driving and setting up education materials for informational meetings. Occasional minor climbing. Exposure to outdoor elements, cold, heat, dust and noise.  Occasional exposure to hazards associated with construction areas, toxic or caustic chemicals, fumes or airborne particles.  May be required to wear a respirator and may occasionally be exposed to wet or humid conditions.  • Irregular and extended work hours required to prepare for and attend committee and public information meetings, including • SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-26 APPENDICES P. C ONSERVATION A CTION P LANS SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-27 APPENDICES Q. R ESIDENTIAL W ATER S ALES T ARGETS Note: The following tables are included to provide approximate targets to better inform customers conservation efforts. These values are based on the data available at the time of the conservation plan update, and may change as better or more accurate data becomes available, water use patterns change, residential population patterns in the SLCDPU service area change, and as other factors change over time. Combined Residential Water Targets Current (2024) 5-year goal (2030) 10-year goal (2035) 15-year goal (2040) Long-term (2060) Total Per Household Sales (gal/household) 171 169 166 164 158 Indoor Household (gal/household) 64 64 62 62 59 Outdoor Household (gal/household) 107 105 103 102 98 Per Capita Production (gpcd) 109 108 104 101 96 Total Per Person Sales (gpcd) 89 88 86 85 82 Indoor (gpcd) 54 53 52 52 49 Outdoor (gpcd) 35 34 34 33 32 Single Family Residential Water Targets Current (2024) 5-year goal (2030) 10-year goal (2035) 15-year goal (2040) Long-term (2060) Total Per Household Sales (gal/household) 389 384 377 376 359 Indoor Household (gal/household) 138 136 134 133 127 Outdoor Household (gal/household) 251 248 244 243 232 Per Capita Production (gpcd) 187 185 178 173 164 Total Per Person Sales (gpcd) 151 150 147 145 140 Indoor (gpcd) 54 53 52 52 49 Outdoor (gpcd) 98 97 95 95 90 SALT LAKE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN DRAFT Page A-28 APPENDICES Duplex Water Targets Current (2024) 5-year goal (2030) 10-year goal (2035) 15-year goal (2040) Long-term (2060) Total Per Household Sales (gal/household) 191 189 185 183 176 Indoor Household (gal/household) 104 103 101 100 96 Outdoor Household (gal/household) 87 86 84 83 81 Per Capita Production (gpcd) 122 121 116 113 107 Total Per Person Sales (gpcd) 99 98 96 95 91 Indoor (gpcd) 54 53 52 52 49 Outdoor (gpcd) 45 44 43 43 42 Triplex Water Targets Current (2024) 5-year goal (2030) 10-year goal (2035) 15-year goal (2040) Long-term (2060) Total Per Household Sales (gal/household) 144 143 140 139 133 Indoor Household (gal/household) 97 96 94 93 89 Outdoor Household (gal/household) 47 47 46 45 44 Per Capita Production (gpcd) 99 98 94 92 87 Total Per Person Sales (gpcd) 80 79 78 77 74 Indoor (gpcd) 54 53 52 52 49 Outdoor (gpcd) 26 26 25 25 25 Four-Plex Water Targets Current (2024) 5-year goal (2030) 10-year goal (2035) 15-year goal (2040) Long-term (2060) Total Per Household Sales (gal/household) 151 149 146 145 139 Indoor Household (gal/household) 103 102 100 99 94 Outdoor Household (gal/household) 48 47 46 46 45 Per Capita Production (gpcd) 98 96 93 90 86 Total Per Person Sales (gpcd) 79 78 77 76 73 Indoor (gpcd) 54 53 52 52 49 Outdoor (gpcd) 25 25 24 24 24 SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 DRAFT Page A-29 APPENDICES R. L INKS AND R EFERENCES Alliance for Water Efficiency. Landscape Transformation: Assessment of Water Utility Programs and Market Readiness Evaluation. Chicago, Alliance for Water Efficiency. 2019 Alliance for Water Efficiency. Landscape Transformation Study2018 Analytics Report: Chicago, Alliance for Water Efficiency. 2018 Alliance for Water Efficiency. State-Level Water Loss Laws in the United States. Chicago, Alliance for Water Efficiency. 2019 Alliance for Water Efficiency. Sustainable Landscapes: A Utility Program Guide. Chicago, Alliance for Water Efficiency. 2019 Alliance for Water Efficiency. The Water Efficiency and Conservation State Scorecard: An Assessment of Laws. Chicago, Alliance for Water Efficiency. 2017. American Water Works Association. Evaluating Urban Water Conservation Programs: A Procedures Manual. American Water Works Association. 1993. American Water Works Association. M1 Principles of Water Rates, Fees, and Charges. Sixth Addition. Denver, American Water Works Association. 2012 American Water Works Association. M36 Water Audits and Loss Control Programs. Third Addition. Denver, American Water Works Association. 2009. American Water Works Association. M52 Water Conservation Programs: A Planning Manual. Second Addition. Denver, American Water Works Association. 2017. American Water Works Association. Water Conservation-Oriented Rates: Strategies to Extend Supply, Promote Equity, and Meet Minimum Flow Levels. Denver, American Water Works Association. 2005. American Water Works Association Research Foundation. Effectiveness of Residential Water Conservation Price and Nonprice Programs . Denver, AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 1998. American Water Works Association Research Foundation. Impacts of Demand Reduction on Water Utilities. Denver, American research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 1996. American Water Works Association Research Foundation. Public Involvement Impact Strategies: A Manager’s Handbook. Denver, AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 1995. American Water Works Association Research Foundation. Residential End Uses of Water. Denver, AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 1999. Beecher, Janice A., Thomas Chesnutt, David Pekelney. Socioeconomic Impacts of Water Conservation. AWWA Research Foundation and American Water Works Association. 2001. DeOreo, William, Peter Mayer, Benedykt Dziegielewski, Jack Kiefer. Residential End Uses of Water. Water Research Foundation. Denver, Co. 2016. Recommended State Water Strategy. Salt Lake City, Governor’s Water Strategy Advisory Team. 2017. Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. Salt Lake City Secondary Water Irrigation Master Plan. Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. 2019. Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. Salt Lake City Storage and Conveyance Plan. Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. 2020. Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (2019). Salt Lake City Water Supply and Demand Master Plan. Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. 2019. Salt Lake City Drought and Water Shortage Contingency Plan www.slc.gov/utilities/conservation/droughtplan State of Utah. Regional Water Conservation Goal Report. Hansen Allen & Luce, Bowen Collins & Associates, Inc. 2019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Water Conservation Plan Guidelines. USEPA-832-D-98-001. Washington, D.C. 1998 US Environmental Protection Agency. Resilient Strategies Guide for Water Utilities. 2019. Utah Code73-10-31: Water Conservation Plan Required https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title73/Chapter10/73-10-S32.html Vickers, Amy. Handbook of Water Use and Conservation. Amherst, Waterplow Press. 2001. SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 DRAFT Page A-30 APPENDICES S. G LOSSARY OF T ERMS , A BBREVIATIONS , AND A CRONYMS Acre Feet (af): A measurement to describe a volume of water; One acre-foot is the amount of water which would cover one acre of land to a depth of one foot; 325,851 gallons. Action Plan: A more detailed, analytical course of action to implement programs, initiatives, or measures outlined in the Master Plan to achieve specific objectives, typically including information relating to time-lines for implementation, evaluative measures, and costs relating to staffing and/or materials; a component of the Annual Report. Annual Report: This report will provide an evaluative update on existing programs, as well as outlining new conservation initiatives for the coming year, providing initiative timelines, estimated costs, participating groups, and responsible parties. ASR: Aquifer Storage and Recovery BCWTP Big Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant Best Management Practice (BMP): For the purposes of Salt Lake City, a BMP is defined as a policy, program, practice, rule, regulation, or ordinance, or the use of devices, equipment, or facilities that meets either of the following criteria: • An established and generally accepted practice among water suppliers that results in the more efficient use of water; or • A practice for which sufficient data are available to indicate that significant conservation or conservation related benefits can be achieved; that the practice is technically and economically reasonable and not environmentally or socially unacceptable; and that the practice is not otherwise unreasonable for most water suppliers to carry out CAP: Water Conservation Action Plan; these are plans submitted by City Divisions and community stakeholders and reflect commitments of actions and goals towards achieving further water conservation. CCF: one hundred cubic feet; a unit of volume equivalent to 748 gallons of water and is the standard of measure used by the Department for billing purposes. CCWTP City Creek Water Treatment Plant Conservation: A set of strategies to solve the dilemma of providing water to people, both through supply and demand management; wise, efficient use of water by suppliers and customers. CUP: Central Utah Project CUWCD: Central Utah Water Conservancy District Demand Management: Methods to encourage customers to reduce water demand, whether through a change in behavior, the implementation of water- saving technologies, or through the reduction or elimination of waste. Evaluation: An overall determination of a conservation program or measure’s effectiveness in achieving an articulated objective. GPCD Gallons per capita per day; a unit of measure typically used to express the average number of gallons of water used by the average person each day in a water system. The calculation is made by dividing the total gallons of water used each day within a water system by the total number of people identified as residing within that water system. This calculation does not account for nor describe the industrial or commercial base within a community, nor does it account for individuals using water within the system, but not counted as residing within the system delivery area, such as commuters. Goals: General statements of purpose for a measure or program; goals should compliment and reinforce other community and Utility goals. Gray Water: wastewater generated in the household or at a place of work, excluding toilet wastes (black water), and including wastewater from bathroom sinks, baths, showers, laundry facilities, dishwashers, assuming there is no fecal material present. JVWTP via Jordan Aqueduct Jordan Valley Water Treatment Plant via Jordan Aqueduct LCWTP Little Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design SALT LAKE CITY WATER CONSERVATION PLAN 2025 DRAFT Page A-31 APPENDICES Major Conveyance Study: A study conducted by Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities to provide a report on existing and future supplies; major conveyances and storage facilities; and demand projections. Master Plan: A conceptual framework to show direction of intent. Measure: A device, incentive, or technology targeted at a particular type of end user or water use that, when implemented, will save water Metrics: a systematic method of measurement or comparison; in relationship to the Water conservation Master Plan, a method to assess program need and effectiveness mg Million gallons mgd Million gallons a day Monitoring: An ongoing process to assess results of an effort; steps in the process might include identifying what will be measured, what assumptions will be held, what estimates are agreed on, and what measuring tools will be used. Multi-family Residential: A planning term used to describe a building where two or more families live in separate units under one common roof; for example, duplexes, apartments houses, townhouses, and condominiums. Parleys WTP Parleys Water Treatment Plant POMWTP via POMA Point of the Mountain Water Treatment Plant via Point of the Mountain Aqueduct Practice: An action or system that is beneficial, empirically proven, cost- effective, and widely accepted in the professional community. Program: A set of conservation practices and measures planned to be implemented together and intended to support water conservation efforts. Project: Systemized efforts to achieve an objective. Projected savings: An estimate of the amount of water which will be conserved because suppliers and/or customers are implementing certain practices. Public Utilities: Refers to the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Retrofit: An umbrella term that refers to the modification of something; in the case of water conservation, retrofit refers to modifications to plumping fixtures or processes to increase efficiencies. Supply Management: Methods by which a utility maximizes the use of available untreated water. Sustainability: A decision-making concept describing development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. ULS: Utah Lake system Unaccounted-for water: A term used to describe the various ways water is difficult or impossible to measure due to such issues as the evaporation of water in canals and reservoirs, under-registering of water through aging meters, leaks, fire suppression, and hydrant flushing. Watershed: The major canyons of the Wasatch Mountain Range (the Wasatch Canyons), and their drainages that are a critical source of water for the communities served by the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities. WCMP: Water Conservation Master Plan This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 09/22/2025 Date Sent To Council: 09/23/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Library Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Janice Kimball to the Library Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent and ending on June 30th. Janice Kimball currently lives in District 5. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/17/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/20/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Thomas Merrill to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Thomas Merrill currently lives in District 4. Approved:* Otto, Rachel ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor KIM SHELLEY Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 www.slc.gov/parks/ PHONE 801-972-7800 FAX 801-972-7847 October 16, 2025 Dear Mayor Erin Mendenhall, We are pleased to share our formal recommendation for Thomas Merrill as the District 4 Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Trails Advisory Board representative. Thomas Merrill brings extensive experience in community advocacy, particularly within the downtown area of District 4. He has a deep understanding of the neighborhood’s needs and priorities, informed by his years of dedicated service and experience. From 2018 to 2024, Thomas served on the Downtown Community Council, including the last two years as Council Chair. During his tenure, he consistently demonstrated strong leadership and a commitment to representing Salt Lake City’s downtown families. We respectfully ask for your consideration and support of Thomas Merrill's appointment as the District 4 representative on the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Trails Advisory Board. Respectfully, Kim Shelley, Public Lands Director Tyler Murdock, Deputy Director for Public Lands SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/17/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/20/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Austin Whitehead to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Austin Whitehead currently lives in District 5. Approved:* Otto, Rachel ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor KIM SHELLEY Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 www.slc.gov/parks/ PHONE 801-972-7800 FAX 801-972-7847 October 16, 2025 Dear Mayor Erin Mendenhall, We are pleased to share our formal recommendation for Austin Whitehead as the District 5 Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Trails Advisory Board representative. Austin Whitehead is currently pursuing his Master’s degree in City and Metropolitan Planning at the University of Utah. Austin is deeply passionate about ensuring that outdoor spaces are accessible and welcoming to everyone. Austin actively advocates for community use of parks and trail systems, encouraging residents to connect with and enjoy these shared spaces. His commitment to park safety and community engagement makes him an excellent choice to represent District 5. We respectfully ask for your consideration and support of Austin Whitehead's appointment as the District 5 representative on the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Trails Advisory Board. Respectfully, Kim Shelley, Public Lands Director Tyler Murdock, Deputy Director for Public Lands SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/17/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/20/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board appointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the appointment of Christian Chavez to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Christian Chavez currently lives in District 4. Approved:* Otto, Rachel ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor KIM SHELLEY Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH PHONE 801-972-7800 October 16, 2025 Dear Mayor Erin Mendenhall, We are pleased to share our formal recommendation for Christian Chavez as an At-Large Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Trails Advisory Board representative. Christian Chavez is a dedicated advocate for West Side residents, drawing on his strong personal connections to those neighborhoods to understand their unique needs and priorities. In addition to his advocacy for the West Side, Christian prioritizes making the downtown district a welcoming and secure environment where families can live, gather, recreate, and enjoy accessible green spaces. His approach emphasizes both community well-being and the importance of creating inclusive outdoor spaces that foster connection and pride across the city. We respectfully ask for your consideration and support of Christian Chavez’s appointment as an At-Large representative on the Parks, Natural Lands, Urban Forestry & Advisory Board. Respectfully, Kim Shelley, Public Lands Director Tyler Murdock, Deputy Director for Public Lands SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 10/16/2025 Date Sent To Council: 10/20/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board reappointment Recommendation: Bicycle Advisory Committee Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the reappointment of Laura Lewis to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Laura Lewis currently lives outside the City. Approved:* Otto, Rachel SALT LAKE CITY BOARD MEMBER TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 11/03/2025 Date Sent To Council: 11/04/2025 From:  Otto, Rachel Subject: Board reappointment Recommendation: Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board Recommendation:  The Administration recommends the Council approve the reappointment of Meridith Benally to the Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board for a 3 year term starting on the date of City Council advice and consent . Meridith Benally currently lives outside the City. Approved:* Otto, Rachel Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/22/2025 15:14 Tonua Hamilton help with housing stability aging in place home modifications I contacted Dan Dugan regarding an ADU but I now realize I must modify my home first. What assistance can I seek for this? Architecture assistance and planning? Vetted contractors? 10/28/2025 16:30 Joseph Smith Shut down the decorated house on 900 E There's a house on 900 E near Bryan Avenue that is constantly over decorated for Halloween every year. Every year cars slam on their brakes in front of their house and almost cause accidents. I can't tell you how often I hear cars honking because someone slammed on their brakes to look at that house. Furthermore, it's incredibly dangerous for pedestrians. There's a crosswalk there with a light that people constantly ignore because they're staring at the house instead of driving safely. Tonight someone almost hit me and my dog while we were walking. It's really exhausting for people in the neighborhood to worry about their safety because of this vanity project. Would be great to see the city do something about it for once. 10/30/2025 13:52 Emily Mortensen Question on city molasses-style gears Inquiry about expediting process of building-use changes 10/31/2025 11:15 Janet Smith Bryan Avenue road between 1700 E and 1900 E Hi Dan, This is my second request for our road to be repaved. It’s crumbling before our eyes. The construction project at the end of the street is probably not helping yet beautiful new home is being built. Blake and I won’t be able to attend your town hall meeting for District 6 so we’re letting you know our hopes before the meeting. Thanks so much for offering to take questions. Hopefully, we will be able to attend another Town Hall later on. Warmest regards, Blake and Jan Smith 10/31/2025 13:56 Betty Iverson Oppose the Sugar House Park Hotel Dan, I understand that the Sugar House Park Hotel now goes to the SLC Council for a vote. I hope that we can count on you to vote NO on this proposed hotel. Sugar House is already over run with development which has made traffic a nightmare especially in the 1300 E 2100 S area. A hotel is not needed and I know you have heard from many long time sugar house residents (like Judi Short) in the article who oppose the development. Please do not rubber stamp this and stand with the Sugar House residents who oppose this development! Check out this post on Nextdoor: https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextdoor.com%2Fp%2FYgQNDwh- 6h74%3Futm_source%3Dshare%26extras%3DMjY4NTIzMzE%253D%26ne_link_preview_links%3D%26share_pla tform%3D6%26utm_campaign%3D1761613079528%26share_action_id%3Daae48d5f-99b4-4bbc-b588- ca1973671276&data=05%7C02%7CDaniel.Dugan%40slcgov.com%7Cebe34a03b8bc4f6ea34308de15be01a7% 7C9fa2c952dd504b06ba6a4b9bd7adda03%7C0%7C0%7C638972103131999021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3 D%7C80000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xR8EIVXAyAgFFpBOTx%2B4Ncg6Whge2FpPcNCENlzhuVI%3D&reserved=0 Betty Iverson 10/31/2025 13:59 Michelle Lundberg Bad Roads Hi Dan, An acquaintance of mine shared this marketing campaign from Dominos. It’s pretty creative. It leads me to wondering how we get our road repaved. Do I need to call Dominos? I’m not republican but it leads me to wonder: if Trump can get private donors to pay for a new ballroom, then can we get creative to repave Belaire Drive? It’s silly that you can have your road repaved/surfaced twice in 5 years and one of the steepest streets in SLC can’t get resurfaced even though it’s in terrible condition and hasn’t been resurfaced in 15 years. Is the secret to resurfacing our road that I need to run for office? I think we can do better. What ideas do you have to help us get better streets in SLC soon? Have a great day! Michelle Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 10/31/2025 15:36 Anonymous Constituent City Immigrant Statement Hi, I'm calling to express my disappointment about the statement that the Mayor and City has said about the arrested of the illegal immigrant lady yesterday at the Airport. I can't believed that our government is picking side and will not enforce the immigrants law. I had been robs by an illegal immigrants before and they're causing such a problems. you guys don't understand! I have a lot of immigrant friends that they came here legally and did all the right things. but these illegal one I do not support and I can't believed that the city is picking their side. Bye 11/3/2025 16:31 Anonymous Constituent Phone call to City Council Hello I'm calling because over the weekend, The SLCPD has murder the illegal immigrants and I'm voting my voice to demand the bodycam to be release as soon as possible! 11/4/2025 12:43 David Vickery Sugarhouse Hotel Hi Dan I think the proposed Sugarhouse Hotel is a great idea. It will enhance the park to have a place to get a snack, a cup of coffee or a meal after a walk around the park. I hope you will support the planning commission’s recommendation to modify the zoning and approve construction. I also hope you will support the Rio Grande Plan. I think it would provide enormous benefit to the city if implemented. There is no reason why it couldn’t be completed in time for the 2032 Winter Olympics. What it holding back approval? As for the proposed sports district, I’m skeptical, despite all the hoopla. I’m old enough to remember back to the 1970’s when another billionaire, named Adnan Kashoggi, was going to remake downtown with a massive development including 30 story office towers. It was to be called the Triad Center. It ended up as just a few modest buildings on the northwest corner of 300 West and North Temple. Regards David Vickery 11/4/2025 12:51 Tod Cracroft Dilworth Tennis Courts Should Be Changed to Pickleball Hi, I live near Dilworth School where the tennis courts are an eye sore and rarely used. What would it take to convince those in charge to convert that neglected recreation area into pickleball courts that would be a real benefit to our neighborhood? Does Salt Lake City have a say in it? Would you be agreeable to advocate for this needed and surely popular choice? I’m not pleased to drive by the torn and drooping tennis nets every day. Let me know what you think and what I should do to keep the ball rolling. Thank you, Tod Cracroft 11/4/2025 13:02 Dwight Barrett Use of deadly force I am sorry that an officer had to shoot and kill a man Wednesday. I am sorry the officer had to use deadly force. No one has a right to throw rocks at our police without consequences. I don't throw rocks at the police. I know better. If you throw rocks at the police you should expect to be shot or beat up etc. I support the use of deadly force and support the policeman who shot the man who was throwing rocks. Law and order must be maintained. Dwight J Barrett 11/5/2025 15:30 Brad Shelton State Street Racing/Noise & Graffiti Concerns D4 Brad Shelton reached out to the Council Office to highlight the issue of the noise on State St. As a resident of Downtown he mentioned that the racing up and down the street is a real problem. He asked that there be a focus on noise ordinances. He also shared an image of graffiiti on the old PSB. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/6/2025 15:00 John Woesteut CIP Project Support Request Dan, You will eventually see that I have submitted a CIP again for Texas Street Replacement.  I appreciate your reaching out last spring,  our meeting and your support for the request last year.  I am asking for your support again this year.  I learned recently that successful CIP requests have the support of Community Councils. Nick Wilkinson has again submitted a CIP request for replacing Nevada Street.  We spoke last year of doing these “new door” streets at the same time to benefit from economy of scale. We are seeking a letter of support from the Sugar House Community Council. The CIP program was initially explained to me as a program for citizens to make requests for projects outside of the City’s priorities for a given year.  It quickly became clear that this is not the primary emphasis of the program.  The vast majority of projects and funding are for City projects, not citizen/constituent requests.  The ability for citizens to get projects funded is progressive, wise and sincerely appreciated. However, the funding for City projects over citizen projects is out of balance.  Citizens get excited about the possibility of getting a project approved and then are reasonably disappointed to see only a small number of their projects approved. Please help me understand the current status and if it’s possible to increase the number of citizen requests.  In my opinion, the funding available for citizen requests is inconsistent with the message about the CIP being for citizen requests. Thank you! John Woeste 11/6/2025 15:18 Janine Bailey Sheldon Yalecrest Park Local Historic District Petition (PLNHLC2025-00927) ) Dear Dan, Thank you again for your willingness to hear my concerns regarding the apparent shutdown of the City’s legitimate LHD process by an apparently unauthorized and definitely unqualified person(s). Also, below is the letter I left with owners I was not able to contact in person. I am attaching it to document that we carefully emphasized that signing the petition was meant only as an expression of interest in hearing from the City (as opposed to the rumor mill) what the LHD designation entails for owners. Signing the petition was by no means a ballot. I did hear from people who signed and did not withdraw their signatures that whoever went door-to-door gathering withdrawals was trumpeting inaccurate information, making both me and the City out to be dishonest and untrustworthy. I am offended by this and would hope that the City would also value the opportunity to correct misinformation and tamp down speculation. Sincerely, Janine Sheldon 11/14/2025 15:09 Kristin Phillips Strongly oppose rezoning in my area Just to reiterate my previous email and a voice message I left. I do not want to rezone in my area. I think that will ruin the entire feel of this area. As it is so many apartment buildings and townhouses are going in just around the corner on REDACTED. The University has also added so many students that are contributing to congestion and noise in the area. I also am very disappointed with the Council regarding the goings on at the Senior Center. It is appearing like a shady situation and that doesn't look good for anyone. I would hope there will be lots of public meetings and explanations as to what the heck happened with this remodel. Thank you for your time. 11/14/2025 16:51 Christian Mogren mult-family housing the more affordable housing, be it multi family or not, the better. opponents are selfish and class-ist --Christian 84102 11/14/2025 16:55 Justus Salazar Fire Ordinance I think that fire ordinance is important for our state and cities during dry seasons. We are a desert state and have many fires per year, but I think we are too strict on policy when it comes to Professionals doing fireworks during the 4th and 24th of July. Citizens should not be allowed to light off fireworks in high risk areas but if it is a Professional Company that the City and the Fire Marshalls are involved and on hand at the event I don't see a problem with it. ( The drone event at Jordan Park was such a waste of time and dumb. It lasted 10 min and families took their kids down to watch the fireworks and got a drone show that was a waste of time). 11/14/2025 20:04 Jonathan Boxer Wildlife interface I am in favor of it. Please adopt it. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/14/2025 22:12 Scott Rosenbush Feedback on Proposed Fire Safety Rules to Reduce Wildfire Risk Dear Council Members, Please accept and consider my comments on the Proposed Fire Safety Rules to Reduce Wildfire Risk in the Wildlife / Urban Interface (WUI). I have serious concerns about the impact of the legislation proposed for adoption. I respectfully request that the City amend the proposed language to minimize impact on the affected property owners – including my family. This would not be the first time that Salt Lake City has modified language proposed by another authority to make it in the best interests of the City and its residents. My specific requests and recommendations are in bold below. This ordinance, and the creation of the property maps have put a target on the backs of these property owners – including me. You may be aware that homeowners’ insurance rates have increased substantially in the last few years. Some neighbors report being cancelled by their carriers without notice. In order to prevent unintended consequences of this ordinance – that is, wholesale cancellation of insurance – I request that you specifically add language that prevents insurance companies from discriminating against the mapped properties if they are in compliance with the ordinance. The proposed ordinance includes a definition of an Insurance Services Office (ISO). However there is no further description of this office anywhere in the ordinance. It does not describe how it would be created, how it would operate, or who it would be responsible to. As a result I request that this Definition be removed from the ordinance. 202 Definitions: INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE (ISO). An agency that recommends fire insurance rates based on a grading schedule that incorporates evaluation of fire fighting resources and capabilities. It seems that permits would be required under this ordinance (Sections 105.2 sub sections 7, 12) even if only interior alterations are being proposed. That should be beyond the reach of this ordinance. Please remove Sections 105.2 sub sections 7, 12. RESPONSIBILITY comes with Authority. Sections 107.1.1 and 108 absolve the City for any errors by its employees. I understand that employees are human and humans make mistakes. However a property owner should NOT be held responsible for errors made by City employees. Responsibility comes with Authority. I request that these two sections be removed from the ordinance: 107.1.1. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Inspections presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. 108 Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other pertinent laws and ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other laws or ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Thank you for your attention and action to address these concerns. Respectfully, Scott Rosenbush 11/15/2025 9:31 Greg BERGMANN Ramifications to Property Owners Are Unclear Based on the information provided, there is no reasonable way I can determine the impact of this proposal on my property. Specifically, will this obligate property owners to modify their property even if new construction is not contemplated? Is this designation likely to impact home insurance rates? My property does not actually abut wildlands, why is it included? 11/15/2025 12:26 Erin Moore Support missing middle housing rezone I support this rezone! It is an important part of bringing more kinds of housing opportunity to our city! Please pass this rezoning. 11/16/2025 19:26 Nathab Pyper Missing middle housing Hello, I’m in full support of the act of changing zoning rules around SLC. My wife and I are renting in SLC and are trying to find our first home to purchase. As you know, it’s very expensive and I think it’s at least in part because of the lack of a “missing middle”. We need more variety in the density of our housing around SLC. I also believe that a more walkable, efficient and robust community starts with mixing small commercial spaces for local business into a neighborhood. Thank you! Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/17/2025 10:26 Rosalie Mae Nov 18, 2025 Public Hearing Comment - RMF-35 and RMF-45 I would like to share my support for the proposed changes to the RMF-35 and RMF-45 zoning districts. After reviewing the study, including history and proposed changes, I feel that the changes are needed to better address the need for affordable housing in Salt Lake City. It is a hot topic in the state currently, and I believe by changing/relaxing the restrictions on multi-family housing that are not large apartment buildings, more units will be able to be built. I support the proposed changes, and thank you for your time in considering these updates that will increase available housing in Salt Lake City. 11/17/2025 16:33 Lee Killian Comment on Map of Wildland Urban Interface Parcels This comment pertains to the proposed Map of Wild Urban Interface - Avenues Planning Community. The large residential parcel located at REDACTED (parcel number 09-33-403-004-0000, Lot 4, Federal Heights Plat F) has not been designated as a WUI parcel despite it having a residence, having a high fuel load, and being adjacent to wildland parcels. Consequently, many parcels adjacent to this large residential parcel have been designated as WUI parcels, including our parcel at REDACTED, even though they are not adjacent to wildland parcels and do not have the same wildfire risk. As our parcel is not adjacent to a wildland parcel, our greatest fire danger is likely from the large residential parcel located at REDACTED and not from fire spreading from a wildland parcel. We propose that our parcel not be designated as a WUI parcel for this reason and be treated the same as other parcels not adjacent to wildland parcels. Thank you, Lee Killian Co-owner Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/17/2025 16:36 Scott Rosenbush Feedback on Proposed Fire Safety Rules to Reduce Wildfire Risk Dear Council Members, Please accept and consider my comments on the Proposed Fire Safety Rules to Reduce Wildfire Risk in the Wildlife / Urban Interface (WUI). I have serious concerns about the impact of the legislation proposed for adoption. I respectfully request that the City amend the proposed language to minimize impact on the affected property owners – including my family. This would not be the first time that Salt Lake City has modified language proposed by another authority to make it in the best interests of the City and its residents. My specific requests and recommendations are in bold below. This ordinance, and the creation of the property maps have put a target on the backs of these property owners – including me. You may be aware that homeowners’ insurance rates have increased substantially in the last few years. Some neighbors report being cancelled by their carriers without notice. In order to prevent unintended consequences of this ordinance – that is, wholesale cancellation of insurance – I request that you specifically add language that prevents insurance companies from discriminating against the mapped properties if they are in compliance with the ordinance. The proposed ordinance includes a definition of an Insurance Services Office (ISO). However there is no further description of this office anywhere in the ordinance. It does not describe how it would be created, how it would operate, or who it would be responsible to. As a result I request that this Definition be removed from the ordinance. 202 Definitions: INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE (ISO). An agency that recommends fire insurance rates based on a grading schedule that incorporates evaluation of fire fighting resources and capabilities. It seems that permits would be required under this ordinance (Sections 105.2 sub sections 7, 12) even if only interior alterations are being proposed. That should be beyond the reach of this ordinance. Please remove Sections 105.2 sub sections 7, 12. RESPONSIBILITY comes with Authority. Sections 107.1.1 and 108 absolve the City for any errors by its employees. I understand that employees are human and humans make mistakes. However a property owner should NOT be held responsible for errors made by City employees. Responsibility comes with Authority. I request that these two sections be removed from the ordinance: 107.1.1. Approval as a result of an inspection shall not be construed to be an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction. Inspections presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or of other ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. 108 Issuance of a certificate of occupancy shall not be construed as an approval of a violation of the provisions of this code or of other pertinent laws and ordinances of the jurisdiction. Certificates presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this code or other laws or ordinances of the jurisdiction shall not be valid. Thank you for your attention and action to address these concerns. Respectfully, Scott Rosenbush Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/17/2025 16:38 Jim Jenkin 1/2 Comments on Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment Comments on Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment To: Salt Lake City Council members From: Jim Jenkin, Chair, GACC Land Use Committee 14 November, 2025 It is the stated goal of Planning Initiatives to protect the existing character of the neighborhood. In a Local Historic District the character of the neighborhood is defined by the Historic District. If this were not so, there would be no District. Such Districts are composed of a gestalt of historically contributory properties, and the pattern of private and public green space. This character is neither anchored nor dependent on single historic structures but on the aggregate of all contributing structures to that District. Properties zoned RMF-35 exist within the Avenues, Central City, South Temple, and University Historic Districts (per SLC Zoning Map). The Avenues is particularly vulnerable in the large number of houses zoned RMF-35 that present as SR-1A. This is due to the broadbrush nature of the original RMF- 35 zoning. While my viewpoint is necessarily Avenues-centric, significant historic character is a part of the civic and community identity across the City, and, once lost, can never be replaced. I submit that the proposed ordinance as currently crafted fails to protect the character of the community in Local Historic Districts in the following ways: 1. The proposed ordinance limits protections from height and setback encroachment to only Federal Registry properties. Registry properties compose an extremely small subset of contributory historic structures, and individual listings are discouraged by the Secretary of the Interior in existing Historic Districts. Limiting protections to Federal Registry properties is appropriate outside of Local Historic Districts. Within Historic Districts the character of the neighborhood is composed of a gestalt of contributory Historic properties, therefore, encroachment protections should be extended to all contributory structures in a Local Historic District. 2. Planning Staff contends that sufficient protection will be afforded to contributory structures by the process of review by the Historic Landmarks Commission (the Commission). While one cannot fault Staff for supporting the established process, this Observer, as well as others, finds this statement unsupportable, in that: a. The majority of applications for contributory and non-contributing structures are reviewed at Staff level and thus relatively few are forwarded to the full Commission. For example, at ~225 A Street is a two-and-a-half story flat roof residence that was administratively permitted in ~2010 by recent Planning Staff as a story-and-a-half residence, and in contravention of the Capitol Vista Overlay. b. The historic pattern of Commission decisions has been to allow non- contributory structures to be built to the full capacity of the existing zoning. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/17/2025 16:38 Jim Jenkin 2/2 CONTINUED!! Comments on Ordinance: RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment I have verified this statement with a recent former member of the Historic Landmarks Commission. Summary: The Character of existing Local Historic Districts cannot be maintained under the proposed ordinance as written and the proposal should be defeated. Deficiencies in the proposal will also result in loss of tree coverage, green space, and the possible disruption of private solar generation by height encroachment. Affordability: Local Historic Districts provide an important pool of naturally occurring affordable housing which, while unquantified, is easily established by observing advertised rental rates (even though the choice properties rent word-of-mouth). Under current conditions (construction cost estimates around $350,000 per unit for “affordable” designs) new construction will not result in affordability in the desired “missing middle”. Remedies: The listed deficiencies in the Proposal could be addressed by an Amendment requiring the setback and step-back protections afforded to Registry Properties be extended to all Contributory Structures in Local Historic Districts, and by directing the Planning Department to undertake a survey to identify properties that are SR-1 within RMF-35 zoned areas. A survey for structures exceeding RMF-35 was undertaken by Planning Staff in the formulation of this proposal, but no survey was undertaken to identify areas of SR-1. As an example, Second Avenue between F and G presents entirely as SR-1, exempt for an historic LDS facility. Therefore a survey for SR-1 properties within the RMF would correct oversites in the original downzone. Respectfully Submitted, Jim Jenkin Chair, Greater Avenues Community Council (GACC) Land Use Committee; former Chair, GACC; former Member, Salt Lake Transportation advisory Board (2 terms). landusecom@slc-avenues.org I thank and acknowledge members of the Land Use Committee for their contributions to this document. 11/17/2025 16:40 Kathryn Lindquist zoning changes Dear City Council Members: Regarding proposed zoning changes to allow higher density in neighborhoods with existing single-family lots, please consider that having a set-back from the street of anything less than 20 feet makes the sidewalk unsafe for pedestrians and young kids on bikes. It makes the streets claustrophobic as well. Neighborhoods lose their distinctiveness. Kids on bikes or scooters and parents pushing babies in strollers need space to waver and pass each other. Thank you for considering this, Kathryn Lindquist 11/17/2025 16:42 Lauren Cole RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment Good morning, Attached please find written comment from Wasatch Advocates for Livable Communities (formerly SLC Neighbors for More Neighbors) in strong support of the RMF-35 and RMF-45 Multi-Family Zoning District Text Amendment. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, -- Lauren Cole Policy Manager Wasatch Advocates for Livable Communities Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/18/2025 10:35 Thomas Smart 1/3 East Central Community Neighborhood Watch Unrelated Persons Living Together Dear council member Lopez-Chavez, liasons Fullmer and Johnson, and others, I am writing with regard to the proposal before you that would relax or eliminate the current occupancy limits governing nonrelated persons sharing single-family housing. From a policy perspective, I believe this proposal is counterproductive to the goal of making housing accessible and affordable to permanent residents and families. Its adoption will tend to make the housing market even more attractive than it already is to absentee landlords and Airbnb hosts, fostering an increase in transient occupancy at the expense of housing stock available to those hoping to put down long-term roots in our neighborhoods. Additionally, it will lead to a decrease in the quality of life for those of us who have already made those long-term commitments. My personal experience may be instructive. I purchased my home in the University Gardens neighborhood 28 years ago. I was fully committed to living here, close to downtown, the U and the foothills that I love, and I paid off my mortgage on an accelerated schedule. At the time, the house to my north was owned and occupied by a married couple of university professors, wonderful people. They eventually moved away because of the party culture that sometimes disturbed the neighborhood peace, a culture that was far tamer then than it has become today, but it still drove them away. That house sold to an absentee landlord who has repeatedly overpacked it with a rotating cast of "dude-bro" students. They tend to party incessantly. At 3:00 a.m., one of their parties was so out of control that I was finally attempted to sleep in my car in the garage on the opposite side of the house with earplugs in and white noise playing at full volume on my phone. I never did get to sleep that night. On another occasion, some of the tenants came over to introduce themselves and let me know they would be having a small gathering the next day. At 9:00 a.m. the next morning, they started blasting extremely loud music from an outdoor sound system, drinking heavily from illegal kegs. I would estimate at least 150 people showed up, packing both the front and back yards, the public right of way on two streets, and even climbing onto the roof. I observed several intoxicated people urinating on my fence right outside my window. I observed an intoxicated young woman urinate in my driveway in full view of the street and sidewalk. After several neighbors called, the police responded, but the party resumed as soon as they left. After the police responded a second time, the tenants I had met the day before came over to ask if it was me who had called the police. They said I should know enough to expect that kind of behavior as they're "teenagers in college, and that's what teenagers do" (i.e., admitting to underage drinking and telling me to expect more of the same). These are just two of the more egregious incidents, but I have been a victim of that type of behavior at that house over and over again, and I believe continuing violation of the occupancy rule has been a primary reason why this supposedly single-family residence has become a notorious party house. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/18/2025 10:35 Thomas Smart 2/3 CONTINUED!! East Central Community Neighborhood Watch Unrelated Persons Living Together When I tried to bring these problems to the attention of the property manager, he essentially called me a liar. After the police responded to a recent incident and then left, the tenants yelled at me loudly by name to "f*ck off." That's the house to my north. The one to my south was owned and occupied by a very well-known public servant and his young family when I first moved into my house. They moved to a school district that could better accommodate their special-needs son, but hung onto the house and rented it out to seven U of U football players. They partied loudly and constantly, drank with their many friends at all hours on the front porch, parked their seven giant SUVs illegally on the city parking strip and even in my driveway, threw trash in my bushes even when their own garbage cans were closer at hand, and in many other ways made my life a living hell. During one of their all night parties, one of them could be heard screaming threats to rape a woman all along the block as she fled to get away. Presumably several people, including me, called the police, which led to 12 police cars showing up. A few days later, the football coach showed up at my door to apologize. The homeowner told me he would evict the offenders, but he never did and nothing ever changed. Eventually that owner sold the house, and it has changed several times since then. Almost all the owners have been absentee landlords renting the place out to a far greater number of people than the current ordinance allows. There have even been people living in multiple tents pitched in the backyard, and for several months there were even two people and their two barky dogs living in a camping trailer in the driveway. For the last several years, that property has operated as an Airbnb with seven or more people living in it. Many of these tenants have been unbearable, partying constantly at all hours. The front porch is where many of them have gathered daily to drink and smoke vast quantities of pot, play loud music, and even shoot off aerial fireworks toward the street. It's understandable that they want to "live" on the porch, because inside the house they are packed in like rats, which must be miserable and is certainly dangerous. Early one morning on a game day, they set up a powerful PA system and blasted music out to the street. I recorded the sound pressure levels for 21 seconds at an average of 114 dB and a peak of 132 dB. My window was rattling so hard I thought it would break. Then they started using a microphone over the PA to yell obscenities at random people passing by. I have observed a recent tenant visiting dozens of cars, sometimes 4 or 5 in the space of a couple of hours. They park nearby; he gets into the passenger seat for anywhere from 30 seconds to a few minutes; then he returns to the house and they drive away. More than once I have been able to see the exchange of a ziploc bag and cash. You can draw your own conclusions about what that means. Speaking of cars, tenants of that house have parked their cars in my driveway (sometimes overnight) or blocking my driveway more than 100 times, without exaggeration. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 11/18/2025 10:35 Thomas Smart 3/3 CONTINUED!! East Central Community Neighborhood Watch Unrelated Persons Living Together Sometimes I have had to drive down the sidewalk and out their own driveway to get out of my own house. After one late night / early morning unruly party was shut down by the police, tenants presumably from that house cracked eggs into my mailbox on two different occasions (a felony under federal law), and threw eggs and rotten bananas at the side of my house. And they began harassing me repeatedly by name, even though we had never been introduced. This behavior is extremely intimidating. The elderly neighbor to the south of this offending house (two doors south of me) has also been repeatedly victimized by their unruly and often illegal behavior, but has confided in me that he is too frightened to take any action. By city policy, aside from the people camping in a trailer in the driveway, which they were able to observe directly, zoning enforcement was unable to gather evidence or do anything about these occupancy problems, For example, to my understanding, zoning was forbidden from simply knocking on the door to interview tenants. Finally, a zoning officer was able to get the needed evidence by looking through the front window and seeing multiple mattresses laid out on the living room floor. I believe he issued a warning. Things have become somewhat quieter for me since then, and since the police have broken up multiple parties in the house to my north, (The party house across the street has also been a huge problem for many years, and the house directly west of me has recently started to party hard on occasion, but I won't bore you with those details.) That said, I believe things may be headed in the wrong direction again, and I know that neighbors even closer to the U than me have recently been living through horrific problems. However, at least in theory, we homeowners and permanent residents have the tool of the current occupancy limits to try to address these issues. But if the city decides to enable and even encourage this kind behavior by removing the current occupancy limits, I think I'm done with this neighborhood. I hate to think that my own house will almost inevitably sell to an absentee landlord and become part of the problem after I'm gone, but I have to put my own peaceful existence first. Instead of turning this neighborhood into all flop- and party-houses, I would hope that you strengthen enforcement of the existing ordinances and adopt new policies that encourage people to buy permanent housing for their families and work to knit a closer fabric of community where they choose to live. When people ask me where I live, I half-jokingly say "the University Slums." Let's make it the "University Gardens" again. Let's make policies that encourage the U of U to take proper care of the ever-expanding number of students it admits, help local people and families achieve homeownership and a peaceful life in the communities they love, and encourage people like me (and believe me, there are many) to not just give up. Respectfully, Thomas T Smart East Central City Resident 11/18/2025 20:41 Anonymous Constituent Ale Puy He is a great representative for the Fairpark community