Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/21/2026 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL and SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY and LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY FORMAL MEETING AGENDA April 21, 2026 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at tinyurl.com/SLCCouncilMeetings. Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 SLCCouncil.com   CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Alejandro Puy, Chair District 2 Erika Carlsen, Vice Chair District 5 Victoria Petro District 1 Chris Wharton District 3 Eva Lopez Chavez District 4 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7 Generated: 09:47:51  LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.The Board will approve the meeting minutes of May 6, 2025, May 20, 2025, June 3, 2025, and June 10, 2025. B.LBA CONSENT:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2026-27 The Board will set the date of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2026-27. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2026-27 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   C.LBA ADJOURNMENT:   SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA CONSENT:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2026-27 The Board will set the date of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2026-27.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:     SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of January 13, 2026 and February 3, 2026, as well as, the retreat follow-up meeting minutes of February 3, 2026. G.PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Ordinance: Wilmington Avenue Partial Street Vacation at Approximately 2192 South 2000 East The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a portion of the public right-of-way on Wilmington Avenue adjacent to the property at approximately 2191 South 2000 East. The area is approximately 775 square feet and is between the current property lines and the sidewalk. If approved, the area would be included in the adjacent property owner’s property boundary. The sidewalk would not be impacted by this request. Located within Council District 7. Petitioner: Janice and Vince Ramptons, trustees of the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025- 00990.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 7, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 7, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2.Ordinance: Community Clean Energy Program The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would enact Title 9, Chapter 50 to the Salt Lake City Code, establishing participation in the Community Clean Energy program, formally known as Utah Renewable Communities. The proposal would provide a new opportunity for nearly all homes and businesses within the City to choose clean energy through their Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) bill. Customers will be automatically enrolled in the program, with the option to opt out. If customers choose to stay enrolled in the program, a new fee will appear on their RMP bill.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 7, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Fiscal Year 2026-27 Funding Allocations for Federal Housing and Community Development Grants and City Funding Our Future Housing Programs The Council will consider adopting an appropriations resolution that would authorize grant funding to selected applicants for Federal and City programs. These include funds allocated through Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), the HOME Investment Partnership Program, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funding, along with local Funding Our Future (FOF) housing programs. The resolution would also adopt the Federal One-Year Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). For more information visit www.tinyurl.com/annualhudgrants.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 24, 2026, Tuesday, April 7, 2026, and Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 10, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 24, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 1073 South Navajo Street The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of the property at approximately 1073 South Navajo Street from R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family). The proposal would allow for the construction of additional for-sale homes on the 0.49 acre lot. The applicant intends to retain the existing single-family home. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. Petitioner: Mark Overdevest, the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-01015.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 24, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 24, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 7, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   I.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   J.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   K.CONSENT: 1.Ordinances relating to Fiscal Year 2026-27 City Budget, including the budget for the Library Fund The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment regarding an ordinance adopting the final budget and the employment staffing document for Salt Lake City and related ordinances for Fiscal Year 2026-27. For more information visit https://link.slc.gov/slcfy27.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Ordinance: Compensation for Elected and Statutory Officers and Executive Municipal Officers for Fiscal Year 2026-27 The Council will set the date for Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving the compensation categories for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2026-27.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Ordinance: Camping or Obstructing Public Property and Park Rules Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. at accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to camping on public grounds, streets, parks, and playgrounds, park hours, disposing of unclaimed property, and obstructing sidewalks. The proposal would introduce an updated definition of what constitutes camping and consolidate and clarify the use and obstruction of public spaces and rights of way to reduce confusion and ensure proper enforcement.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   4.Ordinance: Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 346, 350, 354, and 370 South 800 East, and 775 East 400 South The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of the properties at approximately 346, 350 and 354 South 800 East from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Residential Multi-Family) to MU-5 (Mixed-Use 5). The proposal would also amend the Central Community Plan Future Land Use Map of the properties at approximately 346, 350, 354 and 370 South 800 East and 775 East 400 South from Medium Density Residential (15-30 dwelling units/acre) and Medium Density Transit Oriented Development (10-50 dwelling units/acre) to High Density Transit Oriented Development (50 or more dwelling units/acre). The proposed amendments would allow the construction of a mixed-use building encompassing 109 total residential units and ground-floor commercial space, which includes 2-,3- and 4- bedroom units. The properties currently contain three existing residential buildings, including seven apartment units. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to amend the Zoning Map and recommended that the Council deny the amendment to the Central City Community Future Land Use Map. In addition to the requested amendments, the applicant is seeking design review approval to exceed the maximum building façade length of 200 feet, which the Planning Commission will reconsider after the Council takes action on this proposal. The project is within Council District 4. Petitioner: Sean Thompson, representing the property owner Hardage Hospitality. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00641 and PLNPCM2025-00660.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 14, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   5.Ordinance: Fortune Road Partial Street Vacation The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a portion of Fortune Road from approximately 2040 West Fortune Road to the intersection at Wallace Road. The petitioner owns all land adjacent to the proposed street vacation. The proposal would restrict access to their properties, thereby increasing public safety. If approved, the right- of-way would be sold to the petitioners at fair market value and incorporated into their private property. Located within Council District 2. Petitioner: Thatcher Company Inc. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00864.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   6.Ordinance: Mansell Manor Zoning Map Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning of the property at 1726 South Jefferson Street and a portion of 1750 South Jefferson Circle from MU-11 (Mixed- Use District 11) and RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District) to MU-8 (Mixed-Use District 8). The proposal would allow the applicant to construct a multi-family development, however the applicant has not provided details on the proposed development at this time. The proposed Community Benefit for the project states that 15% of the developed units will be sold or rented at 80% AMI (Area Median Income) or below. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 5. Petitioner: The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00690.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   7.Public Hearing: Significant Parcel Conveyance for Mountain View Corridor Construction The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment on the process to transfer a significant parcel of real property to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for the construction of the Mountain View Corridor. Utah Code § 72-4-105 authorizes UDOT to designate existing city streets as state highways, in cooperation with the city, without providing compensation to the municipality. However, in this instance UDOT is seeking title of these city streets and is compensating the City through a roughly equal exchange of property. A public hearing is required under Salt Lake City Code Section 2.58.040, but no further action is required by the Council.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Set date.   8.Resolution: Honorary Street Renaming of a portion of 500 South The Council will set the date of Tuesday May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would honorarily rename a portion of 500 South as “Dolores Huerta Boulevard.” The honorary street name would recognize Dolores Huerta, who is an American labor leader and feminist activist. She co-founded the National Farm Workers Association and is best known for organizing farm workers, leading nationwide grape boycotts, coining the slogan "Sí, se puede" (Yes, we can), and fighting for better wages and working conditions.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   L.COMMENTS:   1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) M.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, 2026, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 6, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – City Council Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Brian Fullmer – Policy Analyst, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Petro presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:04 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 1 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Victoria Petro will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.The Council will approve the meeting minutes of May 7, 2024; May 21, 2024; June 4, 2024; and June 11, 2024. Motion: Moved by Board Member Puy, seconded by Board Member Dugan to approve the meeting minutes of May 7, 2024; May 21, 2024; June 4, 2024; and June 11, 2024. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass B.LBA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget; see the Capital Improvement Program Budget Book.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big construction projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 2 Motion: Moved by Board Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 01 of 2025, adopting the tentative budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Board Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Board Member Dugan to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and convene as the Community Reinvestment Agency. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 3 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Director Puy, seconded by Director Mano to adopt Resolution 07 of 2025, adopting the tentative budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass E.CRA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Director Puy, seconded by Director Wharton to adjourn as the Community Reinvestment Agency and convene as the City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 4 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1. 2. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to approve the work session meeting minutes of February 18, 2025; March 4, 2025; and April 15, 2025, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 25, 2025 and April 15, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3. Summary: Mayor Mendenhall presented the Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Recommended Budget, highlighting the following: • Proposed General Fund Budget of $512,471,524 – marking a 6.7% increase from last year’s General Fund budget • No major tax increases in this budget (including no property tax increase) • $2.7M in Westside focused investment (green space, parks, street lighting, etc.) • $2.3M for Vision Zero safety improvements (upgrading crosswalks, intersections, fixing broken/missing sidewalks) • Rate increases for Public Utilities and Waste & Recycling • $3 M in Capital Improvement funds for the first phase of the Green Loop • Targeted commitment of $5 M for deeply affordable housing • Proposed 4% cost of living adjustment for all non-represented City employees MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 6 Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 18, 2025; March 4, 2025; and April 15, 2025, as well as the formal meeting minutes of March 25, 2025 and April 15, 2025. Mayor Mendenhall will present the proposed Salt Lake City budget, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1.Ordinance: Mixed-Use (MU) Zoning Consolidation Zoning Text and Map Amendment The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the City's zoning ordinance and zoning map by consolidating up to 27 existing commercial, form-based, and mixed-use zoning districts into six new mixed-use (MU) districts. The proposal aims to simplify zoning regulations, improve clarity of language, and incorporate missing design standards. The new mixed-use districts will be similar to the current districts but will have changes to setbacks, building height, lot coverage, and permitted land uses. Other sections of Title 21A may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00707. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCMixedUse. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 4, 2025; Tuesday, April 8, 2025; and Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 7 Summary: Nick Tarbet provided a brief introduction to the ordinance. Public Comment: Noah Shephardson expressed concern regarding the proposed amendment, as their building on 375 West Hope Avenue (Madbrook Donut) would become a non-complying structure, and asked for alternative consideration of the MU-3 zone for the area. Scott Amundsen expressed concern regarding excessive building height and smaller setbacks from homes with the proposed changes. Joe Gallegos expressed concern regarding a hole left after their neighbor’s house was demolished and noted it needed proper fencing as it attracted camping and trespassing. Amy Stocks spoke to impacts of the proposed changes, including potential excessive building heights and smaller setbacks. Paul Cryer spoke to impacts of the proposed changes including, potential excessive building heights and a desire to preserve existing greenspace within his neighborhood. Alex Hamory spoke in opposition to the proposed setback changes for their home/neighborhood and urged the inclusion of the National Park Service document: “Protecting a Historic Structure During Adjacent Construction” as an addendum to the zoning merge to protect against unnecessary damage and/or costly litigation. Annie Isaacson spoke to concerns regarding the potential for no rear/side yard setbacks with the proposed changes. Larry Hancock spoke to the negative impacts of a potential residential development near his home, including the obstruction of view and lack of parking provided. Richard Piggott, representing Maverik Inc., spoke to the proposed changes as negatively affecting the ability to provide new services and locations for current customers as well as the ability to operate and maintain existing convenience store locations. Cindy Cromer asked the Council to not adopt the proposal, noted additional written comments would be provided, and spoke in opposition to the requirement that existing city buildings be on the city register in order to receive tax credits. Tim Frederiksen, representing Olympia Sales & Manufacturing, expressed the importance of not losing the ability to manufacture and said the proposed changes would impact his long-time business. Clay Smith expressed opposition to the proposed overlay district because of impacts to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 8 their business and existing property. Jennifer Goodrum expressed concerns about the proposed changes potentially causing an uptick in parking, traffic, and residents in an already small neighborhood. Cameron Broadbent asked the Council to consider a grace period for property owners who either have zoning changes approved in the last few years or were currently working with the City to develop under existing ordinances, allowing submittal of plans through the end of 2025 under the current zoning. Judi Short spoke in opposition to the potential for excessive building height allowances in the Sugar House Business District. Ben Engel expressed optimism regarding the proposed changes noting it would discourage blight, simplify processes, encourage reasonable parking, and hold property owners responsible for maintaining vacant properties. Jeff McComas expressed concerns regarding the proposed changes adversely affecting established businesses in industrial areas of the city. Lynn Schwarz spoke in opposition to the potential for excessive building height allowances in the Sugar House Business District. Jacqueline Anderson expressed concerns regarding the potential for excessive building heights and minimal setbacks within the Avenues area of the City. Brian Heslop expressed concern regarding the proposed changes and potential of residential areas being allowed in industrial/commercial areas, due to safety and wellbeing of both residents and employees of abutting businesses. Soren Simonsen spoke to areas surrounding the Jordan River that were highlighted for transition, asked the Council to examine preservation and expansion of buffers beyond the 100 foot minimum within the current riparian overlay, and advocated for the development of Urban Design Division to help implement the proposed zoning. Matt Sadauckas spoke in favor of the Council adopting the proposed changes as it would enable a greater variety of housing options, potential to improve both parking and transit, and slow the growth of homelessness. Dan Mullen was called to speak but did not have comments for this item. Council Remarks: Council Member Young thanked the public for speaking on the topic and said continuing the item for public comment provided the opportunity to address public feedback. Council Member Puy thanked the public for their feedback, acknowledged their issues, and described looking forward to providing more time to discuss. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 9 Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Young to continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Alley Vacation Near 2680 South Chadwick The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley between approximately 2615 South and 2700 South, and between Beverly Street and Chadwick Streets. If approved, the alley would be divided and given to the property owners that abut the alley. The applicant has requested the vacation due to various structures and vegetation in the alley, as well as an overall lack of use. The request is supported by the Sugar House Master Plan. Located within Council District 7. Petitioner: Taylor Thomas, owner of 2680 South Chadwick. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024- 00973. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Summary: Brian Fullmer provided a brief introduction to the ordinance. Public Comment: Lenny Fitzgerald spoke regarding a facility that would help homeless individuals with a variety of services. (Comments not intended for this item but for general comments section.) Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 26 of 2025, vacating a City-owned alley between approximately 2615 South 2700 South, and between Beverly Street and Chadwick Streets. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 10 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding to cover remaining costs for the 400 South Bridge Reconstruction project, funds to repair homes in the Community Land Trust, additional funding for the Hive Pass program because of increased usage, and funding to expand the scope of a public restroom study. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 1, 2025; Tuesday, April 8, 2025; Tuesday, April 15, 2025; and Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Summary: Jennifer Bruno provided an introduction to the budget amendment. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 27 of 2025, Budget Amendment No. 5 for all items except Council-added items I-2 (contribution to Mead Avenue underpass) and I-3 (contribution to Art in District 4), and defer action on Items I-2 and I-3 to a future Council Meeting. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 11 4.Grant Application: Financial Empowerment Center Academy The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Housing Stability Division of the Department of Community and Neighborhoods to the Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund. If awarded, the grant would fund a Financial Empowerment Center (FEC) with the aim of preventing housing instability and eviction through financial coaching and identifying strategies for overcoming financial barriers to stable living. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda. Summary: Sylvia Richards provided a brief introduction to the grant application. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Puy to close the public hearing and defer action for Item G-4 to a future Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1.Ordinance: Alley Vacation Near 1409 South Edison Street The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a portion of City- owned alley adjacent to properties at approximately 1409 South Edison Street and 1404 South 200 East. If approved, the alley segment property would be divided and transferred to the abutting property owners. The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation. Located within Council District 5. Petitioner: Davis Oatway, an adjacent property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-00439. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 12 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, March 18, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, March 25, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Motion: Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano to adopt Ordinance 28 of 2025, vacating a portion of City-owned alley adjacent to properties at approximately 1409 South Edison Street and 1404 South 200 East. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Summary: Council Member Petro reiterated the rules of decorum. Public Comment: Will Jamison spoke to increases in utility (water) bills and asked for further review of where costs could be cut to reduce the bills. Hilary Jacobs spoke regarding delayed foothill land use management plans and trail use signage highlighting that the community was concerned about the foothills ecosystem being compromised. Daniel Schelley spoke to the Bonneville Shoreline Trail being a multi-use trail for MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 13 pedestrians and bikes and requested the City install right-of-way/multi-use signage along the trail. Cathy Faulkner was called to speak but was not present for comment. Randell Hoffman spoke in support of the proposed City flag designs and the long history of the LGBTQIA+ community in Salt Lake City. Soren Simonsen expressed gratitude for the Council waiving interest accumulated on a business loan from the City for Impact Hub, and detailed the successes of the business and how it had boosted the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the City. Betty Sawyer, Director of Utah Juneteenth Freedom & Heritage Festival, spoke in support of the proposed city flag design that honored the Juneteenth Holiday and described looking forward to honoring the history and heritage of the event. J.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: City Flag Standards The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving City Flag designs and standards for display of a City Flag. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. Council Remarks: Council Member Young spoke to the proposed City flags as an act of love, consideration, and welcoming for all City residents. Council Member Dugan echoed the sentiment of Council Member Young’s statement and thanked the Mayor for her courage and strength. Council Member Mano thanked the Mayor and fellow Council Members noting that the flags were meaningful to him and his family and was an important and critical symbol for the people of the City to feel safe. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 14 Council Member Lopez Chavez thanked the Mayor and fellow Council Members for the support and unconditional care for the residents of the City, noting this signified a response to the joy and celebration of each resident and neighbor. Council Member Wharton spoke to the meaning of each color of the Pride Flag, representing shared humanity and shared ideals of freedom, perseverance, and love and were symbols of the City’s diversity and unity. Council Member Puy said the flags displayed the City’s care for all communities, many of them marginalized, and they symbolized hope, unity, and that all were welcome. Council Member Petro said there would be no compromise of the dignity of all City residents or anyone that chose to be here, and would be evident in all aspects of City business, including those displayed on the flag pole. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Puy to adopt Ordinance 25 of 2025, approving City Flag designs and standards for display of a City Flag. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Tentative Budget of Salt Lake City, including the Tentative Budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving a resolution adopting the tentative budgets of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025- 26. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 15 Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to approve Resolution 12 of 2025, adopting the tentative budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, including the tentative budget of the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes required annual true-ups of property tax increments that go to the Utah Inland Port Authority, Convention Center Hotel, and the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2.Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Ari Tepper The Council will consider approving the appointment of Ari Tepper to the Transportation Advisory Board for a term ending September 25, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 16 3.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Cenezhana Rokhaneevna The Council will consider approving the appointment of Cenezhana Rokhaneevna to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission Board for a term ending December 27, 2027. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 4.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Maxwell Hoagland The Council will consider approving the appointment of Maxwell Hoagland to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 5.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Kerry Doane The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kerry Doane to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 17 6.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – William D. Davis The Council will consider approving the appointment of William D. Davis to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 7.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Jeannie Rollo The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jeannie Rollo to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. 8.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Rebecca Bauer The Council will consider approving the appointment of Rebecca Bauer to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 6, 2028. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 18 Staff Recommendation - Approve. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano to approve the Consent agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 9:09 pm. Council Minutes Approved: CRA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 19 This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, May 6, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 6, 2025 20 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, May 20, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer, Danny Walz – Community Reinvestment Agency Director Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Sylvia Richards – Public Policy Analyst Council Member Petro presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:03 pm MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 1     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 2 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Victoria Petro will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Board will approve the meeting minutes of April 15, 2025. Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Young to approve April 15, 2025, meeting minutes. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass B.LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 3 Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Lopez Chavez to close the public hearing and refer the item to a new public hearing on June 3, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item. There were no public comments. C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adjourn as the LBA and convene as the CRA. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 4 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 8, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Director Lopez Chavez, seconded by Director Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a new public hearing on June 3, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 5 E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Director Lopez Chavez, seconded by Director Wharton to adjourn as the CRA Board and convene as the Salt Lake City Council. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 6 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1. 2. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to approve April 1, 2025, meeting minutes. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass 3. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Resolution 13 of 2025, Celebrating June 2025 as Pride Month. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez ABSENT: Alejandro Puy Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass Summary: Council Member Lopez Chavez read the resolution to the public. Chad Call (Executive Director of Utah Pride Center) spoke on behalf of the Utah Pride Center and thanked the Council for supporting all community members. There were no public comments. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7 G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Items G1 – G4 will be heard as one public hearing. 1.Grant Application: UOVC 2025-27 Victims of Crime Act Grant Program Application Police Victim Advocates The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Police Department to the Utah Office for Victims of Crime (UOVC). If awarded, the grant would fund 50% of two existing full-time Victim Advocates and 80-90% of four part-time Victim Advocates personnel and benefit costs.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item G4 for summary. 2.Grant Application: Bonneville Shoreline Trailhead Land Purchase The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Public Lands to the State of Utah, Division of Outdoor Recreation. If awarded, the grant would fund the purchase of approximately 10 acres of land which would provide the ability for trailhead facilities, assure a critical Bonneville Shoreline Trail connection and alignment, and will provide access to other trails in the area that currently are somewhat inaccessible.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item G4 for summary. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 8 3.Grant Application: School Age Quality Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Community and Neighborhoods to the Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund School Age Quality Out of School Time (OST) programming for kindergarten through sixth grade children at six YouthCity sites.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   See item G4 for summary. 4.Grant Application: Department of Workforce Services Teen Afterschool Prevention Grant The Council will accept public comment for a grant application request from the Department of Community and Neighborhoods to the Department of Workforce Services. If awarded, the grant would fund afterschool programming for teens attending high school and middle school at three YouthCity sites, plus the City and County Building.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Close and refer to future consent agenda.   Summary: Sylvia Richards introduced the item. There were no public comments. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 9 close the public hearing and refer Items G1 through G4 to a future Consent Agenda for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5.Ordinance: Library Budget Amendment No.2 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend the budget for the Library Fund for Fiscal Year 2024-25. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes required annual true-ups of property tax increments that go to the Utah Inland Port Authority, Convention Center Hotel, and the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). Ordinances and Resolution listed below (G6 – G20) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for the Fiscal Year 2025-26. All ordinances will be heard as one public hearing item during the May 20th and June 3rd public hearings.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 29 of 2025, amending the Fiscal Year 2025 final budget of the Salt Lake City Library, including the employment staffing document as proposed. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Austin Kimmel introduced the item. There were no public comments. 6.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the Budget for the Library Fund MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 10 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 7.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 8.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 11   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 9.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 10.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 12 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 11.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 12.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 13 Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 13.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 14.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 14   See item G20 for summary. 15.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 16.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 17.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department The Council will accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would amend MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 15 section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the last annual budget.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 18.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Compiling with Rate Study and Regulatory Requirements The Council will accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance would amend Chapter 17of the Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply with regulatory requirements.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 19.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget: Capital Improvement Program The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other city-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 16 with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   See item G20 for summary. 20.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes Implementation The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in 2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Close hearing and refer to public hearing on June 3, 2025   Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the budget items and clarified that all budget items were presented as a single collective public hearing to implement the Mayor’s recommended MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 17 budget. Public Comment: Ian McCubbin spoke on a CIP request for the Foothills trails maintenance and fire stations funding, and requested the reallocation of $3 million from Green Loop Funding to cover those items. Nathan Peters spoke on a CIP request for speed bumps in the Fairpark neighborhood and requested that funding be used to install safety measures. Kim Paturzo spoke on a CIP request for additional safety measures to be implemented in the Sugarhouse area. Gary Tadesco spoke on a CIP request for the Safe Streets Program, including the installation of a traffic circle around the University of Utah communities, highlighting the poor visibility for pedestrians and residents. Robbie Reber spoke on mountain biking and hiking accessibility around the city and requested the installation and completion of new trails for all levels to use. Jane Anderson spoke on mountain biking and hiking accessibility around the city and requested the installation and completion of new trails for all levels to use. Ned Skanchy spoke on mountain biking and hiking accessibility around the city and requested the installation and completion of new trails for all levels to use. Peter Corroon spoke on CIP request item 54 for Main and Broadway Shade, which was not selected for funding, and requested reconsideration for funding the updates due to safety concerns. Ada Skanchy spoke on mountain biking and hiking accessibility around the city and requested the installation and completion of new trails for all levels to use. Samuel Rowan from District 4 spoke on a CIP request for speed bumps and the restriction of diesel trucks driving along 2100 South to create safety for the community. Josh Quigley, representing the East Central Community Council, spoke on a CIP request for Item G19 1200 East Island Reconstruction that was not selected for funding, and requested a modification to address the needed repairs to curbs and sprinklers to prevent the continued die-off of newly planted and mature trees from lack of water and car destruction. Elisabeth Barrows spoke about general parks and open space funding, requesting that more community programs and activation be implemented to enhance the trails, thereby helping to combat crime and drug issues on the unused trails. Joseph Murphy proposed a change to the current CIP application and selection MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 18 process, suggesting that a portion of the budget be allocated for safety measures to create a more effective way to address local safety issues. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to close the public hearing and refer items G5-G20 to a new public hearing on June 3, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding to cover remaining costs for the 400 South Bridge Reconstruction project, funds to repair homes in the Community Land Trust, additional funding for the Hive Pass program because of increased usage, and funding to expand the scope of a public restroom study. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, April 1, 2025; Tuesday, April 8, 2025; Tuesday, April 15, 2025; and Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 1, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, May 6, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 and Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Summary: Council Members discussed friendly amendments proposed by Council Members Puy, Young, and Wharton, which included splitting motions, adding legislative intents, and clarifying budget items. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to not adopt item I2 and include a Legislative Intent to allocate $14,000 ($2,000 per district) from fund balance to the Community and Neighborhoods budget for FY 26. The purpose of these funds would be to request that the Arts MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 19 Council create a public arts program for small and/or fast district-based peacemaking projects that: 1.Pursue and facilitate public-private partnerships, 2.Feature an equitable and transparent process, and 3.Include the input of the respective Council Member. Furthermore, it is the intent of the Council that administrative staff report on the progress of this program by December 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Eva Lopez Chavez NAY: Sarah Young Final Result: 6 – 1 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to not adopt item I3, close Budget Amendment No. 5, and add more specifications with the Legislative intent as clarified in the previous motion for item I2. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS:   1. There were no questions for the Mayor. 2. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 20 Public Comments: Judith Murphy requested a pause in construction around the City to conduct an environmental impact study before more infrastructure is built. Cheneil Hill, represented the Stand Against Fear and Exploitation (SAFE) nonprofit organization, spoke on community safety and statewide prison reform to help protect children from offenders entering city parks and public areas. Austin Joseph spoke about non-invasive safety precautions that could be implemented to help enhance the community's safety, instead of relying on expensive surveillance cameras. Matthew Reardon spoke on federal building accountability and the unconstitutional silencing of journalists. Ricardo Mejias thanked the City for the Calm Your Streets Program, stating the results were beneficial, and requested engagement from the Council at the upcoming community meeting to discuss the We Connect Program and provide information on creating community proposals. Ian McCubbin spoke on the City Creek Fire shed and City Creek Watershed issues, and requested that more action be taken to be proactive against the risk of fires after a dry winter. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NONE.   L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Alley Closure at Approximately 9 North Chicago St. (Madsen Park) The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would indefinitely close a portion of City-owned alley located at approximately 9 North Chicago Street (Madsen Park) running north/south mid-block between 1000 West and Chicago Street. The proposed alley closure is needed to consolidate all parcels that make up Madsen Park into one parcel to facilitate park improvements that are being funded by the Parks, Trails, & Open Space General Obligation Bond (GO Bond). This portion of the alley doesn’t provide access to nearby residents to their properties or to the park. Located within Council District 2.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 21 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Board Appointment: Planning Commission – Lilah Rosenfield The Council will consider approving the appointment of Lilah Rosenfield to the Planning Commission for a term ending May 20, 2029.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   3.Board Appointment: Planning Commission – Michael Vela The Council will consider approving the appointment of Michael Vela to the Planning Commission for a term ending May 20, 2029.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   4.Board Appointment: Planning Commission – Jeffrey Barrett The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jeffrey Barrett to the Planning Commission for a term ending May 20, 2029. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 22   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5.Board Appointment: Bicycle Advisory Committee – Esther Daranciang The Council will consider approving the appointment of Esther Daranciang to the Bicycle Advisory Committee for a term ending May 20, 2028.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 23   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 8:19 pm Council Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] CRA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] LBA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 24 full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, May 20, 2025 25 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 3, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff, Danny Walz – Community Reinvestment Agency Chief Operating Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Stephanie Elliott – Minutes & Records Clerk, Matthew Brown – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 1     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 2 LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. B.LBA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will continue to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Board Member Wharton, seconded by Board Member Dugan to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 3 Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item; there was no public comment. C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to adjourn as the LBA and convene as the CRA. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 4 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA PUBLIC HEARINGS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will continue to accept public comment and consider approving a resolution adopting the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item; there was no public comment. Motion: Moved by Director Lopez Chavez, seconded by Director Wharton to close the public hearing and refer the item to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 5 Motion: Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Lopez Chavez to adjourn as the CRA and convene as the City Council. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 6 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1. 2. Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Wharton to approve the work session meeting minutes of February 4, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: Ordinances and Resolutions listed below (G1 – G15) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. All items will be heard as one public hearing. 1.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the Budget for the Library Fund The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2024-25. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 7 Welcome to the Public Meeting Rules The Council will approve the work session meeting minutes of February 4, 2025. Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   2.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   3.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   4.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 8 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   5.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers and Executive Municipal Officers The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   6.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 9 TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   7.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   8.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 10   9.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   10.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   11.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 11 Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   12.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider an ordinance that would amend section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the last annual budget.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   13.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Compiling with Rate Study and Regulatory Requirements The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider approving an ordinance would amend Chapter 17of the Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply with regulatory requirements.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 12 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   14.Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget: Capital Improvement Program The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   15.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes Implementation The Council will continue to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in 2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - TBD Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 13   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to close the public hearing and refer items G1 – G15 to a future date for action. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Jennifer Bruno introduced the item, stating that all items were being held as one public hearing for the Mayor's Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City for FY 2025-26. Public Comments: Evan Sugden spoke to a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) request not being funded for high-end bicycle parking and to cooperation with the City for more bike racks at The Milk Block and Downtown Library. Esther Hunter spoke to a CIP request from the East Central Community that included a maintenance implementation plan for the 1200 East islands that were in need of repair. Matthew Morriss spoke on a CIP request for speed reduction measures on 800 West in the Glendale neighborhood, requesting that funding be used to create a safer environment and mitigate the damage and danger caused by speeding vehicles. Kelbe Goupil spoke on a CIP request for traffic calming measures in the Glendale neighborhood along 800 West and requested that these safety measures be funded in the community. Avery Edenfield spoke to a CIP request for pedestrian safety and installation of a High-Intensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK) in Richmond and Zenith in the Brickyard community, and requested that safety measures be installed to help pedestrian traffic in the Brickyard area near Millcreek Commons. Kimball Young spoke on the health and well-being of Salt Lake City being directly reflected in the condition of the streets in our community, requested that funding be allocated to improve road conditions around the city. Tina Hernandez spoke on the need for improved pedestrian safety at crosswalks be implemented in District 7 on Zenith Street, stating the current signage was inadequate, cars created unsafe conditions in the neighborhood, and a recent rear-end accident created an urgent need to address these safety issues. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 14 John Woeste (Westy) spoke about the unsafe road conditions within Salt Lake City and requested that the Texas Street CIP be funded to help create a safer community and replace the current deteriorating road on this street. Council Comments: Council Member Young thanked the community for attending and advocating for their interests, providing solutions to help create change and making the city a safer place. Council Member Mano clarified that the budget adoption in the coming weeks would include the amount allocated to the CIP program, and specific projects would be approved to fund later in the year. Jennifer Bruno provided the upcoming timeline for the final CIP funding. H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: NONE.   I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions for the Mayor. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Frederick Jenny spoke on the policy requirements for the Granary District Plans and burying the rails along 500 West. Stephen Otterstrom spoke on the recent sales tax adopted by the City, stating it was not beneficial to the community, and requested that simple community needs be funded before projects that increased the community's financial burden. Cheneil Hill spoke on a legislative initiative proposed by the Stand Against Fear and Exploitation (SAFE) nonprofit organization, requesting the Council's support for a sex offender registry violation accountability act to strengthen penalties for violating the terms of the registry. Eduardo Guzman spoke on behalf of the Carpenters Union Local 801, stating labor brokers were creating unfair job opportunities by offering cash bids and payments to labor contractors, and requested city intervention to protect Union members. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 15 Vidal Miranda, a member of Carpenters Union Local 801, spoke about the unfair practices of labor brokers who create opportunities that are not in the best interest of certified, accredited union members seeking employment, and requested city intervention to protect the Union and its members. J.NEW BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Economic Development Loan Fund - Hruskas LLC. The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would approve a $200,000 loan for Hruskas, LLC. at 1751 South 1100 East from the Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Hruskas, LLC. takeout restaurant offering sweet and savory kolaches stuffed pastries. This loan will assist in the creation of two new jobs in the next year and the retention of nine current jobs.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Wharton to adopt Ordinance 30 of 2025, approving a $200,000 loan for Hruskas LLC from the Economic Development Loan Fund. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 The Council will consider adopting a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $700 million aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2025, for the purpose of financing and refinancing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 16 Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Resolution 14 of 2025, adopting the bond parameters and recognizing the date to set a public hearing on the bond issuance for July 1, 2025. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Resolution: Issuance of Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2025 The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment for a parameters resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of not more than $700 million aggregate principal amount of one or more series of Airport Revenue Bonds, series 2025, for the purpose of financing and refinancing certain Capital Improvements to the Salt Lake City International Airport. The Council's action includes authorizing the execution of a supplemental indenture, a bond purchase agreement, and other documents as required.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 13, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Ordinance: Zoning Map Amendment at Approximately 128 North N Street The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting and ordinance that would amend the zoning for the property at approximately 128 North N Street from the SR-1A (Special Development Pattern Residential District) to RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential District). The MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 17 proposal would enable the development of three residential infill rental housing units behind the primary structure on the property. The property sits on the East side of N Street one parcel south of the corner of N Street and 3rd Avenue. The property is located in the Avenues Local Historic District. The existing structure is rated as contributing to the historic district and would not be altered under the proposal. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 3. Petitioner: John Van Trigt, the property owner. Petition No.: PLNPCM2024-01079.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.5) for Fiscal Year 2024-25 The Council will consider approving Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No.5) for Fiscal Year 2024-25.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a Staff Recommendation - Approve.   4.Board Appointment: Racial Equity in Policing Commission – Aleksei Hernandez-Nietling The Council will consider approving the appointment of Aleksei Hernandez-Nietling to the Racial Equity in Policing Commission for a term ending December 27, 2027.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 18 TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 19   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m. Council Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] CRA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] LBA Minutes Approved: [Date will be added upon approval] _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 3, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 20 transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 3, 2025 21 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The Local Building Authority, Community Reinvestment Agency, and the Salt Lake City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Formal Session on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. The following Board Directors/Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Darin Mano, Alejandro Puy, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Matthew Brown- Deputy City Recorder, DeeDee Robinson – Minutes & Records Clerk, Thais Stewart – Deputy City Recorder, Taylor Hill – Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant Council Member Puy presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:01 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 1     LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY of SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH MEETING   A.LBA OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Board/Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. B.LBA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The LBA’s Capital Projects Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26 only includes the bond debt services for the Glendale and Marmalade Libraries. (Other Capital projects throughout the City are included in the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.) The LBA is a financing tool for cities and government entities, like libraries, to bond for capital projects at better interest rates. Capital projects are big projects like parks, public buildings, and street projects.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Board Member Dugan, seconded by Board Member Wharton to approve Resolution 2 of 2025, adopting the Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 of the Capital Projects Fund of the Local Building Authority. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 2 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass C.LBA ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adjourn as the Local Building Authority and convene as the Community Reinvestment Agency. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 3 SALT LAKE CITY COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. D.CRA POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:   1.Resolution: Budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Board will consider approving a resolution that would adopt the final budget for the Community Reinvestment Agency of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Director Mano, seconded by Director Dugan to adopt Resolution 10 of 2025, approving the Fiscal Year 2026 CRA Budget reflected in the attached Key Changes spreadsheet. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass E.CRA ADJOURNMENT:   Motion: Moved by Director Wharton, seconded by Director Mano to adjourn as the Community Reinvestment Agency and convene as the Salt Lake City Council. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 4 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young ABSENT: Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 6 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 5 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined.     F.CITY COUNCIL OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 2.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2025 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. Summary: Council Member Puy read the Resolution. Stacy Smith (Car Show Coordinator, Juneteenth Festival Event) was present to accept the Resolution. Council Member Lopez Chavez arrived during this agenda item. Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Joint Resolution 15 of 2025, recognizing June 19, 2025 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass G.PUBLIC HEARINGS: NONE.   H.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: Ordinances and Resolutions listed below (H1 – H15) are associated with the implementation of the Mayor’s Recommended Budget for Salt Lake City, including the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 6 1.Ordinances Relating to Fiscal Year 2025-26 City Budget, Excluding the Budget for the Library Fund The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for Salt Lake City, Utah, excluding the budget for the Library Fund which is separately adopted, and the employment staffing document of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 32 of 2025, approving Salt Lake City’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget as outlined in the attached key changes spreadsheets and staffing document, excluding the schedule for capital projects and debt and the Library Fund, including the contingent appropriations as listed on the motion sheet under Motion #2, Items A and B. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 2.Ordinance: Adopting the Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 7   Motion: Moved by Council Member Lopez Chavez, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt Ordinance 31 of 2025, approving the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 3.Ordinance: Adopting the Rate of Tax Levy, Including the Levy for the Library Fund, for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance adopting the rate of tax levy, including the levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan to adopt Ordinance 33 of 2025, setting the final rate of tax levy, including the final levy for the Library Fund, upon all real and personal property within Salt Lake City, made taxable by law for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as listed on the motion sheet, and authorize the Council Chair to sign the necessary documentation for the State Tax Commission. The Council has asked the Attorney’s Office to work with the State Tax Commission and Attorneys to review the recent tax advice regarding the library budget, understanding the new advice combining the Library and City as one tax entity, to outline its impacts to both the Library and City budgets and changes to policy oversight. A tax of 0.003180 on each dollar of taxable valuation of which: A. 0.002130 shall be credited as revenue in the General Fund, generating $108,006,905 of ongoing revenue; and B. 0.000011 shall be credited to the judgment levy for the General Fund, a one-year adjustment generating $579,167 of one-time revenue; and C. 0.000630 shall be credited as revenue in the Library Fund, generating $31,945,704 of ongoing revenue; and MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 8 D. 0.000328 shall be credited toward repayment of General Obligation Bonds, generating $16,634,258 of ongoing revenue; and E. 0.000081 shall be credited as revenue in the Governmental Immunity Fund for tort liability, generating $4,107,305 of ongoing revenue. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 4.Ordinance: Amendments to the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider approving an ordinance amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 34 of 2025, amending various fees and fee information set forth in the Salt Lake City Consolidated Fee Schedule. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 5.Ordinance: Compensation Adjustment for Elected and Statutory Officers and Executive Municipal Officers The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municipal officers of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 9 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 35 of 2025, approving a compensation adjustment for elected and statutory officers and executive municiple officers of Salt Lake City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 6.Ordinance: Compensation Plan for All Non-Represented Employees of Salt Lake City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance approving a compensation plan for all non-represented employees of Salt Lake City.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 37 of 2025, approving a compensation plan for all non- represented employees of Salt Lake City. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 7.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of an MOU between Salt Lake City and AFSCME for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating necessary funds to MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 10 implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 36 of 2025, appropriating necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1004, representing eligible employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 8.Ordinance: Appropriating Necessary Funds to Implement Provisions of the MOU between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance appropriating the necessary funds to implement, for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City Corporation and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 11   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 38 of 2025, appropriating the necessary funds to implement for Fiscal Year 2025-26, the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Salt Lake City and the International Association of Firefighters Local 81, representing eligible employees. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 9.Ordinance: City Owned Motor Vehicles The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 39 of 2025, amending Section 2.54.030 of the Salt Lake City Code to update policies and restrictions related to the use of City owned motor vehicles. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 10.Ordinance: Parking Enforcement The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 12 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 40 of 2025, amending Sections 12.56.140, 12.56.150, 12.56.160 and 12.56.200 of the Salt Lake City Code to update the time frames, dates, and processes related to parking and parking enforcement. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 11.Ordinance: Reallocation of the Responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 41 of 2025, amending Sections of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to the responsibilities of the Department of Public Services and the Department of Community and Neighborhoods. (Items H4 through H13 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 12.Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend section 2.08.120 of the Salt Lake City Code identifying the functions and responsibilities of the Sustainability Department. The amendment responds to a Legislative Intent from the last annual budget.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 30, 2024 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to defer this item to a future meeting date. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 13.Ordinance: Title 17 Updates Complying with Rate Study and Regulatory Requirements The Council will consider adopting an ordinance that would amend Chapter 17 of the Salt Lake City Code. The Department of Public Utilities requests the updates to align with the City’s proposed water, sewer, and stormwater rate structures and to comply with regulatory requirements.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 14 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinance 42 of 2025, amending Chapter 17 of the Salt Lake City Code, complying with rate study and regulatory requirements. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass 14.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt $55,806,110 to be transferred into CIP, including APPROVING $13,489,253 in funding as shown on the motion sheet. Later this year, the Council will consider CIP project-specific allocations. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 15 15.Resolution: Addendum No.9 to Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for Transit Master Plan Frequent Bus Service Routes Implementation The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No.9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. Frequent service is a goal for buses to arrive at least every 15 minutes. This agreement covers the routes on 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South and 1000 North/South Temple. The interlocal agreement signed in 2018 is for twenty years, with a goal of full implementation of the FTN as described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - TBD Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025 and Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Ordinances A-K as shown on the Motion Sheet relating to the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget, with the exception of Item I, Ordinance: Amending Title 2 Administrative Organization for the Sustainability Department, which will be deferred to a future meeting date. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Young, seconded by Council Member Petro to adopt Resolution 17 of 2025, authorizing the Mayor to enter into the proposed addendum No. 9 to the Interlocal Agreement with UTA to implement 2025-26 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) service. (Items H4 through H13 and H15 were approved as part of Motion 6. See item H15 for final vote details.) AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Young to adopt the Legislative Intent Statements as outlined on the motion sheet under Motion 5, Items 1 through 10. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 16 AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass I.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. There were no questions. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) Public Comments: Council Member Puy reiterated the rules of decorum. Cheneil Hill spoke regarding a proposed Sex Offender Registry Violation Act, the importance of its passage by State Legislators, and asked for the Council for their support on the matter. Scott Bates, on behalf of the Clark and Christine Ivory Foundation, expressed appreciation for the City’s cooperation with the rezone in connection with the recent annexation process for the Northpointe area. Mark Harousseau spoke to a dangerous intersection in his neighborhood (location inaudible) and urged the Council to support the installation of a hawk signal to enhance safety for pedestrians. Abdirizak Ibrahim spoke to issues facing the Westside of the City such as lack of affordable family-sized housing, no hospital, and no high school in the Glendale neighborhood. Lisia Satini spoke to issues facing the Westside, including safety, homelessness, healthcare (lack of hospital), and asked the Council for additional support for refugee communities of color on the Westside of the City. Council Remarks: Council Member Young addressed the request/need for a hawk signal at the dangerous intersection and said many neighbors had voiced concerns, options were being reviewed, and described looking forward to further conversation regarding the issue. J.NEW BUSINESS: NONE.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 17 K.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1.Ordinance: Northpoint Area Annexation The Council will consider adopting an ordinance annexing certain unincorporated properties North-Northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake County border with Davis County. For more information visit https://tinyurl.com/NorthpointAnnexationSLC.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 6, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s).   Motion: Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to adopt Ordinance 43 of 2025, annexing certain unincorporated properties north-northeast of the Salt Lake International Airport and near the Salt Lake County border with Davis County pursuant to ordinance and maps included in Attachment A. I further move the Council adopt a Legislative Action requesting the administration to review the property at approximately 2699 West 3300 North for potential rezoning to M1-A. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass L.CONSENT: 1.Ordinance: Zoning Text Amendment for Public Hearing Requirements for Appeals and Variances The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code relating to public hearing requirements for appeals and variances. The proposal makes the necessary changes to comply with House Bill 368 (HB368), adopted by the Utah Legislature in 2025 and went into effect on May 7, 2025. One part of HB368 prohibits cities from holding a public hearing for any appeals of a land use decision and requests for variances. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-00327.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 3, 2025 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 18 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 1, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 8, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   2.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will set the date for Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project- specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, June 5, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 15, 2025 and Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 20, 2025; Tuesday, June 3, 2025; and Tuesday, July 8, 2025 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and Tuesday, August 19, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Set date.   3.Board Appointment: Airport Board – Jonathan Freedman The Council will consider approving the appointment of Jonathan Freedman to the Airport Board for a term ending June 10, 2029.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 19 4.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Jenny Bonk The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jenny Bonk to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   5.Board Reappointment: Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs (CDCIP) Advisory Board – Brad Christensen The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Brad Christensen to the CDCIP Advisory Board for a term ending June 5, 2028.   FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 10, 2025 Staff Recommendation - Approve.   Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Petro to approve the Consent Agenda. AYE: Victoria Petro, Daniel Dugan, Chris Wharton, Alejandro Puy, Darin Mano, Sarah Young, Eva Lopez Chavez Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass M.ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at 7:36 pm. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 20 Council Minutes Approved: CRA Minutes Approved: LBA Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ Community Reinvestment Agency Chair – Darin Mano _______________________________ Local Building Authority Chair – Chris Wharton _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council, CRA, and LBA meeting held Tuesday, June 10, 2025 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL, LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY Tuesday, June 10, 2025 21 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, January 13, 2026. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Eva Lopez Chavez, Erika Carlsen, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer, Lindsey Nikola – Deputy Chief of Staff, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administrative Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Caitlin Carlino – Minutes & Records Clerk, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Weston Clark – Mayor's Senior Advisor, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Greg Cleary – Budget Director, Andrew Reed – Deputy Budget Director, Michael Sanders – Budget & Policy Analyst, Kate Werrett – Budget & Policy Analyst, Kira Luke – Communications & Policy Analyst, Angela Price – Legislative Affairs Director, Jorge Chamorro – Director of Public Services, Julie Crookston – Deputy Director of Public Services, Brian Redd – Chief of Police The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1 Work Session Items   1.Nomination of Council Chair and Vice Chair for Calendar Year 2026 ~ 4:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will take a straw poll to nominate the Council Chair and Vice Chair for calendar year 2026. The process includes expressions of interest from Council Members, nominations for each position, and then voting each for the Chair and Vice Chair positions. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, January 13, 2026     Summary: Council Member Dugan nominated Council Member Puy for Council Chair. Council Member Lopez Chavez seconded the nomination. Council Member Dugan moved to close nominations. All Council Members were in favor of closing the nominations. Council Members then cast their votes via paper ballots. Results were confirmed by the City Attorney and City Recorder with seven votes for Council Member Puy as Council Chair. Council Member Young nominated Council Member Carlsen for Council Vice Chair. Council Member Dugan seconded the nomination. Council Member Wharton moved to close nominations. Council Member Young seconded closing the nominations. All Council Members were in favor of closing the nominations. Council Members then cast their votes via paper ballots. Results were confirmed by the City Attorney and City Recorder with seven votes for Council Member Carlsen as Council Vice Chair. Council Members Puy and Carlsen made remarks stating appreciation, humility and preparedness in leading the Council as Chair and Vice Chair.   2.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:15 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, wildfire mitigation, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2 Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   Summary: Weston Clark presented the community engagement highlights, which included: •A reminder for the public to utilize shape.slc.gov •District-specific park and project updates •600/700 North Street reconstruction project updates and website with further information at 600northslc.org •2025 Love Your Block program briefing Andrew Johnston presented the homelessness updates, which included: •Homeless Resource Center utilization above 100% •Rapid Response Team outcomes and reductions in homeless camps due to increase in shelter beds •Code Blue and Unsheltered Utah requests for volunteers with a link for more information at justserve.org/projects/3e6849d0-e8b3-4fd9-942f-b1a0376980bd •Upcoming resource fairs •2026 Point In Time Count requests for volunteers with a link for more information at endutahhomelessness.org/salt-lake-valley/salt-lake-county-pit-count Council Request: Council Member Carlsen requested tangible results from the Love Your Block program. Weston Clark stated that they would work to quantify the program’s feedback/results.   3.Utah Open Meetings Law Training, Code of Conduct, and Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) Training ~ 4:30 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the City Attorney’s Office about the Utah Open Meetings Law and Code of Conduct, and from the Recorder's Office about the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA). This briefing will serve as the annual trainings for both the City Council and the Community Reinvestment Agency Board of Directors. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 3   Summary: Mark Kittrell provided a brief introduction and presented Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA) Law, Council Code of Conduct, and Government Records and Access Management Act (GRAMA) training to Council, as required by Utah State Code. Keith Reynolds presented the 2025 GRAMA request statistics. Council and staff discussed how police report requests must be handled as official GRAMA requests, and Lehua Weaver outlined how GRAMA requests were processed within the Council Office.   4.Informational: State Legislative Briefing ~ 5:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive a briefing about issues affecting the City that may arise during the 2026 Utah State Legislative Session. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Summary: Angela Price provided a brief introduction, noted the Legislative Affairs team’s work as the 2026 Utah State Legislative Session was set to begin, and presented the following updates: •Salt Lake City priorities and values •Utah State priorities as established by the House and the Senate •Number of expected bills to be introduced and methods by which the City tracked and categorized them, available for the public to view at https://www.slc.gov/attorney/legislative-affairs/ •Specific bills to watch regarding Truth in Taxation, property taxes, state/higher education budget cuts, gas tax, land use, Police Officers, and social justice issues •Homeless campus legislative conversation updates •Transportation amendment targeting Salt Lake City roads (SB-195) Council Members and Angela Price discussed clarification on a bill that may impact City employees who identified as transgender, importance of addressing housing issues, bills potentially affecting homelessness, and pride in community members practicing their civic engagement. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4   5.Informational: 2025 Roadway Construction Net Maintenance ~ 5:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing from the Public Services Department on the 2025 roadway construction net maintenance and the impact of newly completed construction projects to overall maintenance needs. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Summary: Kate Werrett introduced the item, noting a 2% maintenance budget increase for the Streets Division and new employee needs being discussed as an initial step rather than a formal request. Jorge Chamorro and Julie Crookston presented the annual report, identifying inventory growth and increased maintenance costs. Council Members and staff discussed the cost of maintenance compared to initial investment, the importance of maintenance within the first seven years of project completion—particularly the use of slurry seal and chip seal to extend roadway life—and how maintenance investment strategies could be applied to other City assets. Council Request: Council Member Young requested information on the process of maintenance prioritization. Julie Crookston stated they would provide that information to Council in small group meetings or a presentation.   6.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2025- 26 ~ 5:35 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about Budget Amendment No.4 for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes the rescoping of Open Streets funds, a mobile command center purchase, Old Library (formerly known as the Leonardo) capital improvements, a pedestrian bridge, and Fleet purchases, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 5 Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 17, 2026   Summary: Kate Werrett and Greg Cleary introduced the item. Mary Beth Thompson stated that Greg Cleary would be leaving employment at Salt Lake City for international opportunities and thanked him for his service. Andrew Reed presented the revenue forecast. Greg Cleary presented the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 budget amendment, its effects on the General Fund (GF) and revenue, and a fund balance change from 11.1% to 16.91%, above the 13% target. Council received clarity that the fund balance increases were one-time funds and not ongoing funds. •Council Request: Council Member Young requested information on the $272 in gains on property dispositions in the revenue forecast. Andrew Reed stated they would follow up with that information. Council Members and staff reviewed and discussed several budget amendment items: Item A-10: Backhoe for Public Services Streets Division & Tractor for Public Lands Parks Division (General Fund: One-time – $292,819) Kate Werrett presented the item. Council Members and Julie Crookston discussed the future use plans for the equipment. •Straw Poll: Support for Item A-10, funding for the backhoe for Public Services Streets Division and tractor for Public Lands Parks Division. All Council Members were in favor. Item A-17: Justice Court, City Prosecutor’s Office and Legal Defenders Association (LDA) Staffing Increases (General Fund: Ongoing – $189,749 & IMS: One-time – $9,000) Michael Sanders presented the item. Council Members, Mary Beth Thompson, Richard Mauro (Executive Director of the Salt Lake Legal Defender Association), Jill Love, and Will Carlson (Deputy District Attorney, Salt Lake County District Attorney’s Office) discussed funding for the proposed sixth Justice Court judge and associated staff; timing related to onboarding staff; recent increases in judicial caseloads; the importance of upholding constitutional rights/due process; and a variety of factors accounted for in the Mayor’s proposed budget as they related to funding new attorneys. •Straw Poll: Support for Item A-17, budget allocation related to the Justice Court, Prosecutor, and City Attorney. All Council Members were in favor. •Council Request: Council Member Petro requested of the LDA an efficiency audit or annual report to evaluate how funding was allocated, identify potential redundancies, and ensure resources were maximized in support of the MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 6 organization’s mission and outcomes. Item D-5: Streets GO Bonds Interest Reallocation for FY 2025-26 (Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Fund, One-time – $1,735515.83, Budget Neutral) Kira Luke presented the item; there was no further discussion. •Straw Poll: Support for Item D-5, approval of Streets GO Bond interest reallocation. All Council Members were in favor. Item A-14: Police Overtime Funding (General Fund, One-time – $3,810,941) Michael Sanders presented the item. Council Members and Chief Brian Redd discussed appreciation for officers’ service; fiscal responsibility in the budget with regard to police overtime while maintaining public safety; staffing efficiency strategies, including a recent pay raise for officers; and the importance of officer wellness, rest, and retention. •Straw Poll: Support for Item A-14, budget amendment request specific to police overtime. All Council Members were in favor. Chief Brian Redd then addressed the need for a police mobile command post, citing recent reliance on Fire Department resources and its importance during large-scale and critical incidents. Council Members, Mary Beth Thompson and Chief Brian Redd discussed police retirement costs and budgetary challenges/strategies. Item D-1: Legislative Affairs Operating Budget (General Fund: Ongoing – $80,000) Michael Sanders Presented the item; there was no further discussion.   Standing Items   7.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of Chair and Vice Chair.    There was no report of the Chair and Vice Chair.   8.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: •Financial Disclosure, and •Scheduling Items.    Summary: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 7 Lehua Weaver and Nick Tarbet reminded Council Members to submit their annual conflict of interest disclosure forms and reviewed legislative committee assignments, which Council agreed to continue. Staff also announced that the legislative subcommittee meetings would begin the following day and occur weekly during the legislative session.   9.Tentative Closed Session -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an individual. b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining. c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation. d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration, or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms. e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration, or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms. (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale, and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale. f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems. g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.    Item not held.     MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 8 Meeting adjourned at 6:29 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Alejandro Puy _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, January 13, 2026 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Work Session on Tuesday, February 3, 2026. The following Council Members were present: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Eva Lopez Chavez, Erika Carlsen, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young Present Legislative leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer, Megan Yuill – Deputy Chief Administration Officer Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Caitlin Carlino – Minutes & Records Clerk, Scott Corpany – Staff Assistant, Brian Fullmer – Public Policy Analyst, Mary Beth Thompson – Chief Financial Officer, Nick Norris – Planning Director, Andrew Johnston – Director of Homelessness Policy and Outreach, Allison Rowland – Senior Public Policy Analyst, Cassie Younger – Senior Planner, Wayne Mills – CRA Senior Project Manager, Angela Price – Legislative Affairs Director, Ben Buckley – Associate Planner, Weston Clark – Mayor's Senior Advisor, Kate Werrett – Budget & Policy Analyst, Austin Kimmel – Public Policy Analyst, Marina Scott – City Treasurer, Tammy Hunsaker – Director of Community & Neighborhoods, Tom Millar – Planning & Design Division Director, Logan Hunt – Real Estate Director, Mark Stephens – City Engineer, Zach Posner – Chief Information Officer The meeting was called to order at 2:07 p.m.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 1 Work Session Items   1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 2:00 p.m.  15 min. The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts, wildfire mitigation, and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Recurring Briefing Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Summary: Weston Clark reminded the public to utilize shape.slc.gov for City department and division community engagement opportunities. Weston Clark also updated the Council on Northwest, Avenues, and Capitol Hill Community Plans, zoning amendments to allow for expanded housing options, and the Ballpark Next upcoming proposed zoning process. Andrew Johnston provided the homelessness update, including homeless resource center utilization rate of 97%, no Encampment Impact Mitigation (EIM) currently scheduled due to lack of large camps, Rapid Response Team (RRT) location details, 2026 Point In Time count completion, upcoming resource fairs, and a call for volunteers for Unsheltered Utah. Council and staff discussed: •The transition to the new public engagement site of shape.slc.gov •Collaboration between the Geraldine E. King Women’s Resource Center and the Gail Miller Resource Center with the Medically-Vulnerable Persons (MVP) program located in Sandy, Utah   2.Ordinance: Disposition of Alleys and Street Text Amendment ~ 2:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend sections 14.52 and 20.16.050 of the Salt Lake City Code to establish a consistent process for requests to close or vacate City-owned public streets or alleys. The proposal would also make the disposition process consistent in the context of a subdivision application and update the polices and standards that must be adhered to.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 2 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 17, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 10, 2026   Council Member Wharton arrived during this item. Summary: Brian Fullmer gave a brief introduction. Benjamin Buckley presented the item, including Planning Commission’s recommendations, consideration factors, method of disposition, inclusion of a street vacation, and public hearing requirement changes. Council Members, Nick Norris, Ben Buckley and Mark Stephens discussed: •Reasoning for April 12,1995 used as the cutoff date for self-inflicted obstructions to be allowed for consideration in vacating an alley •Engineering considerations such as maintaining public right-of-way for existing and future utilities •The text amendment’s goal of streamlining the process to vacate alleys and streets, and not of an act to approve all requests to vacate •Appreciation for the thoughtfulness of the plan and future considerations, such as autonomous vehicle use Council Requests: Council Member Carlsen requested clarification on whether the fees were waived automatically for government entities (such as school districts) or whether the waivers were discretionary. Nick Norris replied they would follow up with verification.   3.Ordinance: Rio Grande Master Plan and Zoning Map Amendment ~ 2:35 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a proposal that would amend the zoning for 32 properties located in the Rio Grande District, between 200 South and 400 South, and 500 West and 600 West, from G-MU (Gateway-Mixed Use District) to D-4 (Downtown Secondary Central Business District). The proposal would allow for additional building height. The proposal would also amend the Downtown Plan to include the mid-block walkways within the Rio Grande District and update the Implementation Plan. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar characteristics. The project is within Council District 2. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 17, 2026   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, March 10, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, March 24, 2026   Summary: Kate Werrett gave a brief introduction. Cassie Younger presented the item, including the plan’s vision, properties proposed to be rezoned, adherence with City’s long-term vision for the neighborhood, and Planning Commission’s positive recommendation. Council Members, Nick Norris, and Wayne Mills discussed: •Concerns of traffic and street safety on 500 South •Intention to operate ground leases on the Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA)-owned properties •Future considerations with regards to possible transit rail line changes/additions and easements •The zoning map amendment’s alignment with the City’s vision for the area   4.Resolution: Northwest Pipeline Building and New Construction Public Benefits Analysis ~ 2:55 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about a public benefit analysis conducted by the Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) for a housing development project known as The Grove, at approximately 321 East 200 South. The proposed development, which would include the historic Northwest Pipeline building as well as new construction, would provide 196 affordable housing units, plus commercial space, a parking structure, a public plaza, and more. The City would sell the 2.42-acre property at a below-market sales price of $1 million, paid over a 55-year period. The public benefit analysis finds that this development project would promote City goals of increasing affordable housing, elimination of a development impediment, and preservation of historic structures and property, among others. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 17, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 17, 2026     Summary: Allison Rowland gave a brief introduction. Tammy Hunsaker and Logan Hunt presented the item, offering both contextual and project-specific information regarding the property, including the following: MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 4 •Significant financing challenges affecting the affordable housing environment •A proposed below-market financing structure designed to support project viability while protecting the City’s interests •The property’s historical designation and background •The request for proposal (RFP) requirements, preferences, and selection process •Housing affordability and wealth-building components of the project •An overview of project costs, timeline, and public benefits Dan Ackerman (President, Housing Assistance Management Enterprise (HAME) and Executive Director of the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC)) presented the unusual challenges of the property, the public-nonprofit collaborative nature of the project, and project process information. Council Members, staff, Dan Ackerman, Ben McAdams (CEO, Common Ground Institute) and Nnenna Lynch (CEO, Xylem Projects) discussed: •Concerns of public safety and site control/activation plans •Strategies to avoid possible vacancies of the building and plans for market rate rent in the commercial spaces •For-rent aspect of the building rather than for-sale •Public benefits for residents of various economic backgrounds •Importance of this project and alignment with long-term City goals   5.Tentative Break ~ 3:25 p.m.  20 min. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - n/a Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a     Council Member Lopez Chavez left during this item.   6.Resolution: Second Issuance of General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space Improvements ~ 3:45 p.m.  30 min. The Council will receive a briefing about the second issuance of the General Obligation Bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space, Series 2026. Voters authorized no more than $85 million for the bond in November 2022. The second issuance would be up to $51 million to fund acquiring, improving, renovating and upgrading various parks, trails, open space and related facilities and recreational amenities in the City, delegating authority to certain officials and officers of the City, and providing for related matters.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 5 FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 17, 2026   Council Member Young arrived during this item. Summary: Allison Rowland gave a brief introduction. Marina Scott and Mary Beth Thompson presented the item, including the background, scope, and timeline of the second issuance ($51 million) of the General Obligation (GO) bond for Parks, Trails, and Open Space Improvements. Council Members, Marina Scott, Mary Beth Thompson, Tom Millar, and Jennifer Bruno discussed: •Timeline and costs of the upcoming tranche affecting property taxes beginning November 2026 •The cost implications of increasing the number of tranches for residents •Importance of communication to residents that this was a voter-approved tax •Clarification that GO Bonds appeared on resident property tax bills (separate line item) only as they were issued and debt service began •The City’s healthy financial situation and its impact on favorable interest rate projections Council Requests: Council Member Petro requested projected cost estimates to taxpayers on their property tax bills. Mary Beth Thompson responded that they would provide the information once the bond sale was complete. Council Member Puy requested increased community engagement, such as mailings and newsletters, directed towards users of the improved parks.   7.Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.4 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Follow-Up ~ 4:15 p.m.  20 min. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about Budget Amendment No.4 for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes the rescoping of Open Streets funds, a mobile command center purchase, Old Library (formerly known as the Leonardo) capital improvements, a pedestrian bridge, and Fleet purchases, among other items.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 6 For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026, Tuesday, January 20, 2026, and Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 17, 2026   Summary: Kate Werrett gave a brief introduction to the budget amendment and items needing straw polls. Allison Rowland, Mary Beth Thompson, Jill Love, and Austin Kimmel presented individual items. Item A-6: Pedestrian Bridge Over the Surplus Canal at Glendale Golf Course (General Fund: One-time – $250,000) Allison Rowland presented the item; there was no further discussion. •Straw Poll: Support for Item A-6, the pedestrian bridge over the surplus canal. All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent. Item A-20: Funding for Fisher Mansion (Capital Improvements Program (CIP): One-time – $500,000) Kate Werrett presented the item. Council Members, Jill Love, and staff discussed the importance of utilizing funds for the Fisher Mansion and preserving Salt Lake City’s history through curated historical exhibits. Council Member Wharton proposed setting aside $100,000 of the $500,000 for artifacts exhibits. •Council Requests: ◦Council Member Puy requested information on remaining funds needed to complete the Fisher Mansion preservation project. Jill Love responded that they would provide that information. ◦Council Member Puy requested including a rotating, more diverse exhibit in the Council Chambers during the loan of the Brigham Young portrait. ◦Council Member Puy requested that the previously displayed immigrant- focused exhibit on the City and County building’s first floor be restored. •Straw Poll: Support for $100,000 artifacts exhibit funding. All Council Members present were in favor with Council Member Lopez Chavez absent. Item A-18: Parking Wayfinding Signage (General Fund: One-time – $584,495) Council Members stated their interest for updated parking signage and digital tools within the City for wayfinding. •Council Request: Council Member Puy proposed a legislative intent to look at coordination with private partnerships that could identify open public parking spot availability for the public. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 7 Item D-2: Engineering Planning and Design Housekeeping and Expansion (General Fund: Ongoing – $80,000) Allison Rowland presented the item, including clarification of additional funds as a housekeeping item; there was no further discussion. Item D-3: Refuse Fund Carry Revenue Budget for Lease Agreement (Refuse: One-time – $8,918,482) Austin Kimmel presented the item; there was no further discussion. Item D-4: Community Events – Rescope (General Fund: One-time – $400,000) Austin Kimmel presented the item. Council Members and staff discussed options to either no longer fund the Open Streets program or rescope it’s purpose. •Council Request: Council Member Puy requested a deeper discussion on the Administration’s vision of activation events and success metrics for downtown business community. Jennifer Bruno suggested incorporating that information with a future Downtown Alliance Council briefing.   8.Advice and Consent: Salt Lake City Chief Information Officer – Zach Posner ~ 4:35 p.m.  10 min. The Council will interview Zach Posner prior to considering his appointment as the Salt Lake City Chief Information Officer (Director of Information Management Services or IMS). FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 3, 2026     Summary: Zach Posner stated excitement to join Salt Lake City and referenced former employment at Salt Lake County as experience. Council Members and Zach Posner discussed a vision for the City’s use of technology, community engagement opportunities, leveraging use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and importance of data protection. Council Member Puy stated their name would be included on the Consent Agenda for formal approval. Council Member Lopez Chavez arrived during this item.   9.Informational: State Legislative Briefing Follow-Up ~ 4:45 p.m.  20 min.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 8 The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about issues affecting the City that may arise during the 2026 Utah State Legislative Session. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, January 13, 2026 and Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a   Summary: Angela Price introduced the item and reminded the public to follow along with the City’s tracking of Utah State House and Senate bills at slc.gov/legislativeaffairs. Angela Price provided an update on numerous bills, primarily tax, transportation, policing, and homelessness measures. Council Members and staff discussed significant concerns about local fiscal impacts, loss of local control (especially over transportation and traffic calming), unfunded mandates, and ongoing negotiations as legislation continued to evolve.   10.Board Appointment: Historic Landmark Commission – Steven Cornell ~ 5:05 p.m.  5 min. The Council will interview Steven Cornell, resident of District 7, prior to considering appointment to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending February 3, 2030. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, February 3, 2026   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 9   Summary: An interview was held. Council Member Puy stated their name would be on the Consent Agenda for formal approval.   Standing Items   11.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair -  - Report of the Chair and Vice Chair    Summary: Council Member Carlsen announced plans to form a future working group that would bring together members of the public, community stakeholders, and City representatives to address concerns recently raised before the Council, including issues related to federal immigration enforcement. Council Member Puy stated importance of building trust with the community.   12.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -  - Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to: •Public Utilities Newsletter •Scheduling Items.    Summary: Jennifer Bruno asked Council Members to inform staff if they wanted to include their newsletters in the April, August, or December utility billings, and of which option they would prefer after reviewing a recent cost comparison of a City-wide newsletter mailing compared to utility bill inclusion. Council Member Puy and Jennifer Bruno discussed the importance of public utility bills for identifying possible water leaks and that Council mailers were also included in utility bill electronic statements.   13.Tentative Closed Meeting -  - The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Meeting. A closed meeting described under Utah Code Annotated (UCA) Section §52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to discussing: a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental    MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 10 health of an individual. b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining. c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation. d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration, or (ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms. e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right or water shares, if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: (A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration, or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best possible terms. (ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be offered for sale, and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the sale. f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems. g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct. A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. Motion: Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Lopez Chavez to enter into Closed Meeting for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act. AYE: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Eva Lopez Chavez, Erika Carlsen, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass Summary: Closed meeting started at 5:37 p.m. Council Members in attendance: Council Members Dugan, Lopez Chavez, Puy, Carlson, Wharton, Petro, and Young Staff and Administration in attendance: Mayor Mendenhall, Lindsey Nikola, Rachel Otto, Megan Yuill, Jennifer Bruno, Nick Tarbet, Lehua Weaver, Whitney Gonzalez Fernandez, Mark Kittrell, Keith Reynolds, Matt Brown, and Austin Kimmel Closed meeting ended at 6:31 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 11  Motion: Moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Wharton to exit the Closed Meeting. AYE: Victoria Petro, Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Eva Lopez Chavez, Erika Carlsen, Daniel Dugan, Sarah Young Final Result: 7 – 0 Pass   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 12 Meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m. Minutes Approved: _______________________________ City Council Chair – Alejandro Puy _______________________________ City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely. This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held Tuesday, February 3, 2026 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 13 PENDING MINUTES – NOT APPROVED The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met on Tuesday, February 3, 2026.  The following Council Members were present: Alejandro Puy, Chris Wharton, Eva Lopez Chavez, Erika Carlsen, Daniel Dugan The following Council Members were absent: Victoria Petro, Sarah Young Present Legislative Leadership: Jennifer Bruno – Executive Director, Lehua Weaver – Deputy Director, Nick Tarbet – Deputy Director Present Administrative Leadership: Mayor Erin Mendenhall, Rachel Otto – Chief of Staff, Jill Love – Chief Administrative Officer  Present City Staff: Mark Kittrell – City Attorney, Keith Reynolds – City Recorder, Caitlin Carlino – Minutes & Records Clerk  The meeting was called to order at 1:18 p.m. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 1 City Council Retreat Follow-Up A Retreat Summary Summary: Council Member Puy recapped the recent Council Retreat, held on January 27, 2026. Council Member Carlsen stated there would be upcoming one-on-one meetings to clarify goals and strategies. Jennifer Bruno requested feedback on retreat materials and edits. Council Members reflected on the retreat and discussed 2026 Council priorities. Discussions included: • Council Member Dugan thanked staff and expressed appreciation for the work and future discussions. • Council Member Lopez Chavez said she was unable to attend the retreat and outlined additional priorities for the coming year, including preparing for potential budget changes with a communications plan, addressing the needs of an aging City population, supporting increased arts funding, and discussing a possible Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA)–Arts Council merger. • Council Member Wharton stated support of the retreat format and raised priorities including legislative and process improvements, distinct and more user-friendly policies (zoning, off-leash dogs, trails signage), traffic safety and enforcement, expansion of murals and public art, and strengthening Council dynamics for more effective disagreement and decision-making. • Council Member Puy highlighted working on achievable municipal actions despite possible federal constraints, with interest in engaging community groups and advancing ordinances to meet City goals. • Council Member Carlsen, serving as the Vice Chair, asked Council Members to view her as a partner and emphasized respectful interactions and adherence to orderly processes. MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 2 Meeting adjourned at 1:42 p.m. Minutes Approved:  _______________________________  City Council Chair – Alejandro Puy _______________________________  City Recorder – Keith Reynolds Please refer to Meeting Materials (available at https://data.slc.gov by selecting City Council Meeting Information) for supportive content including electronic recordings and comments submitted prior to or during the meeting. Websites listed within the body of the Minutes may not remain active indefinitely.    This document along with the digital recording constitutes the official minutes of the City Council Formal meeting held Tuesday, February 3, 2026 and is not intended to serve as a full transcript. Please refer to the electronic recording for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52- 4-203.   MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, February 3, 2026 3 Item G1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: 2191 South 2000 East Partial Street Vacation PLNPCM2025-00990 MOTION 1 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 2 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance not requiring the applicant to purchase the vacated property from the City. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: 2191 South 2000 East Partial Street Vacation PLNPCM2025-00990 BRIEFING UPDATE During the March 10, 2026 City Council briefing, Council Members expressed general support for the proposed partial street vacation. A Council Member suggested the Council consider utilizing the recently updated City code and not charging the applicant for the vacated property since it is in a low-density residential area. The following information was provided for the April 7, 2026 briefing. It is included again for background purposes. ISSUE AT A GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal to vacate an approximately 775 square foot triangular-shaped portion of City right-or-way adjacent to the applicant’s property at 2191 South 2000 East in Council District Seven as shown in the image below. The subject property is between the applicant’s property and the sidewalk on the Wilmington Avenue side of this corner lot and has been fenced and used as part of the applicant’s property for decades. Although the request is for a partial street vacation, granting the request would not affect pedestrian or vehicular travel since the subject property is between the sidewalk and applicant’s property. The existing sidewalk, park strip, curb, and gutter would not be affected. When the application was accepted by the Planning Division, City ordinance required vacated street property to be sold to applicants at market value or an agreement for public improvements in lieu of Item Schedule: Page | 2 payment. An updated ordinance was recently adopted by the City Council which no longer requires payment for vacated street property when adjacent to low density residential properties. The Council has the option to not charge the applicant for the vacated property. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted unanimously to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed partial street vacation and determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. Aerial image showing the subject property’s approximate location outlined in red. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division. POLICY QUESTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page | 3 In addition to the Planning Commission public hearing commenter, Planning staff received four emailed comments, including one from the Sugar House Community Council, supportive of the proposed partial street vacation. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Consideration 1 – Policy Considerations Consideration 2 – Community Plan Considerations Sugar House Plan and 1990 Salt Lake City Design Element. The Sugar House Plan doesn’t specifically address partial street or right-of-way vacations. They noted that redevelopment of the area is unlikely due to its single-family residential zoning. Consideration 3 – Department Review Comments PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Page | 4 • December 31, 2025 – Planning Commission agenda posted to the website, State public notice website, and emailed to the Planning Division listserv. • January 14, 2026 – The Planning Commission briefed on the proposal and held a public hearing for the request. The commission voted 7-0 to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed partial street closure. • January 22, 2026 – Ordinance requested from City Attorney’s Office. • March 12, 2026 – Planning received signed ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. • March 16, 2026 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2026 (Vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on Wilmington Avenue adjacent to the property located at 2191 South 2000 East) An ordinance vacating a portion of the public right-of-way on Wilmington Avenue adjacent to the property located at 2191 South 2000 East, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00990. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 14, 2026, to consider a request made by Janice Rampton (“Applicant”) (Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00990) to vacate a portion of Wilmington Avenue in order to facilitate the construction of a new fence on the property located at 2191 South 2000 East; and WHEREAS, at its January 14, 2026, hearing, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation for the request to vacate the portion of right-of-way adjacent to Wilmington Avenue to the Salt Lake City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter, that good cause exists for the vacation of the public right-of-way described below and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of Wilmington Avenue adjacent to the property located at 2191 South 2000 East, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00990, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, is hereby vacated. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this property, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this Ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of _____________, 20__. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__4/16/24______________________ By: ___________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney Bill No. ________ of 20__. Published: ______________. Ordinance Vacating ROW on Wilmington Ave Adjacent to Property at 2191 S 2000 E EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of the portion of property to be vacated on Wilmington Avenue adjacent to the property located at 2191 South 2000 East: BEGINNING AT A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH 0°12’00” EAST 32.84’ AND WEST 77.33’ FROM THE STREET MONUMENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILMINGTON AVENUE AND 2000 EAST STREET AND RUNNING, THENCE NORTH 0°37’55” EAST 1.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°52;41: EAST 117.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°02’03” WEST 23.27 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF SIDEWALK; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF THE SIDEWALK THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) BEARINGS AND DISTANCES: (1) WESTERLY, 67.06 FEET ALONG A NON- TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT LIES SOUTH 27°51’50” WEST A RADIUS OF 197.90 FEET, AND HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°24’51”; (2) NORTH 86°18’26” 21.85 FEET; (3) THENCE NORTH 89°44’56” WEST 32.62 FEET’ THENCE NORTH 00°37’55” EAST 1.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 775 SQUARE FEET. Item G2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Michael Sanders Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2025 RE:Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance MOTION 1 (close and adopt (if the Council would like to adopt tonight)) I move that the Council close the public hearing and adopt the ordinance enacting Title 9, Chapter 50 to the Salt Lake City Code, Community Clean Energy Program. MOTION 2 (close and defer) I move that the Council close the public hearing and defer action to a future Council meeting. MOTION 3 (continue hearing) I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Michael Sanders Budget & Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE:ORDINANCE – COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM New information obtained since the 12/09/2025 briefing has been added in blue. The Council is being asked to consider an ordinance to formally enroll Salt Lake City as a participating community in the Community Clean Energy Program. This step isrequired under state law and the recently released Public Service Commission (PSC) approval order when the Community Clean Energy Program was approved. The March 4, 2026 approval started a 90-day clock for communities to adopt program participation ordinances. Salt Lake City must decide by June 2, 2026 whether to adopt an ordinance to participate in the Community Clean Energy program, informally known as Utah Renewable Communities. This would automatically enroll most residents and businesses in a new renewable energy program on an opt-out basis, costing about $4/month for residential customers. If the Council does not take action, the City would be removed from the program and it would not be available locally. (Due to the size of the City, it would also negatively affect the program in other cities.) A Public Hearing for this item has been scheduled for 04/21/2026 prior to the Council’s vote to enroll. Once the sixteen cities take action on whether to enroll, several system changes will be initiated by Rocky Mountain Power. Additionally, the program requires budget support in two ways: Reimbursable upfront “startup costs” (estimated at approximately $820,000, plus contingency) are required to enable Rocky Mountain Power’s billing and customer systems. Rocky Mountain Power will initially fund these costs but requires at least one participating community to backstop the expenses through a contractual agreement in the event that program revenues do not fully reimburse the utility after launch. o The City proposes to allocate funds to the Department of Sustainability to serve as this backstop, allowing the program to move forward for the benefit of all participating Schedule: st Briefing: 12/09/2025 nd Briefing: 04/14/2026 Page | 2 communities. These funds would be held and only used if necessary. Based on participation estimates, Sustainability anticipates that startup costs will be fully recovered through ratepayer revenues within the first few months of operation (early 2027) and this City holding account will not be needed. If those estimates and Rocky Mountain Power’s costs are recovered, the City’s contractual obligation would end and the funds would no longer be needed. Mailing expenses of about $156,000 that would be paid to Rocky Mountain Power. This would not be reimbursed. (These funds have already been budgeted throughout the years by Sustainability.) POLICY QUESTIONS ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION What the Ordinance Does The ordinance outlines the main rules and structure of the program, including: Salt Lake City officially joining the program as a participating community. Allowing most electricity customers within current and future city boundaries to participate. Defining when the program starts, including the “Implementation Date” when customer notices are first sent. Explaining that customers will be automatically enrolled unless they opt out by the deadline in the notices. Allowing customers who are not enrolled to opt in later if they choose. Setting rules for termination fees if customers leave the program after the initial no-fee period, and identifying cases where fees would not apply. Describing how new clean energy resources will be selected and approved. Confirming that the PSC sets and adjusts program rates, and that Rocky Mountain Power is responsible for billing customers and notifying them of any changes. Continuing to work with other communities on decisions about clean energy projects and program operations. Following through on the Utility Agreement with Rocky Mountain Power, which is required to operate the program. Reimbursing Rocky Mountain Power for the cost of sending required customer notices. Page | 3 o This is estimated to cost $156,000. Sustainability has budgeted for this expense over several years and it will be included in their FY27 budget Recognizing that the City along with all other participating communities have already contributed funding to reimburse state agencies for third-party expertise to help develop the program. o SLC appropriated funds totaling $385,966.47 in Fiscal Years 2022 and 2023 to the Agency’s budget. Onetime SLC budget impact Before the program can begin, Rocky Mountain Power must complete several required “startup” activities. These include upgrading billing systems so the new program charge can appear on customer bills, setting up customer service support (such as a call line), and creating systems that allow customers to opt out and apply any required fees. These steps are necessary to launch the program, but they must be completed before any program revenue can be collected. The total estimated cost for these startup activities is about $820,000, plus a 10% contingency. Because the program cannot collect revenue until it is fully set up, these costs must be covered upfront. Rocky Mountain Power will pay for these upfront, but requires at least one community to backstop the expenses by signing a contract in the case that RMP is not fully reimbursed through program revenues after the program begins. The City is proposing to act as this backstop so the program can move forward and meet required timelines. Program revenues are expected to begin in early 2027 and are expected to generate significant monthly revenue. Based on current estimates, the full startup cost could be recovered by RMP within the first month or shortly after the program begins collecting revenue. The City is currently in discussions with other participating communities about sharing in these costs if needed. Overall, while the City would take on short-term financial responsibility to launch the program, the long-term financial risk is expected to be low, and funds may only need to be held temporarily rather than be paid to RMP in the case the startup cost contract is triggered. How will this impact residents The Community Clean Energy Program is set up as an opt-out program, which means most customers will be automatically enrolled until they choose to leave. After customers are notified, there will be a period when they can opt out for free. After that period ends, a fee will apply if they decide to leave the program. Based on current participation assumptions, the program is expected to cost approximately $4 per month for most residential customers. Income-qualified residents will not pay this cost, as they will receive a credit that fully offsets the monthly charge. The program is expected to begin sending customer notices in late 2026, with billing starting in early 2027 once implementation is complete. Current planning assumes that about 40% of eligible Rocky Mountain Power customers will participate. If participation is lower than projected, the program is designed to adjust by building out resources more gradually or by starting with a lower-cost renewable project, rather than by increasing customer rates. These conservative assumptions are already reflected in the program’s initial procurement approach. If participation exceeds projections, the program will be able to build more resources and do so more quickly. Noticing and timeline Customers will be notified about the program before it begins. The first notice is expected to be sent in November or December 2026. This notice will be mailed and will inform customers that the program is being implemented and that they will be enrolled unless they choose to opt out. A second notice will be sent about 15 days after the first notice. This follow-up notice may be mailed or sent digitally, depending on the customer’s pre-existing communication preferences. These notices are meant to give customers clear information about the program and time to decide whether they want to participate. Page | 4 The City is required to cover the cost of sending these notices. The Sustainability Department has budgeted about $156,000 to reimburse Rocky Mountain Power for this work. Page | 4 An estimated timeline is below. Page | 5 The following information was provided for the December 9, 2025 briefing. Utah Renewable Communities (URC) is a partnership of 19 Utah cities and counties working together to offer residents and businesses access to net-100% clean electricity by 2030. Formed under the state’s Community Clean Energy Act, URC collaborates with Rocky Mountain Power to design and implement a voluntary clean- energy program that matches participants’ annual electricity use with an equivalent amount of renewable energy. The clean power used for the program will come from a mix of existing renewable resources on the PacifiCorp grid and new projects built specifically for URC customers. Participating customers will remain Rocky Mountain Power customers, and the utility will continue to provide reliable service regardless of whether a customer joins the program. The City has been supportive of this program since 2019 through the passing of various resolutions and contributing financially to the URC budget for program development and implementation costs. The next step for program implementation is for the Public Services Commission (PSC) to review the Program Application at a hearing. This hearing is scheduled for December 16, 2025, after which a decision is anticipated as early as January 2026. If approved, eligible communities will have 90 days after the PSC’s approval to adopt the participation program ordinance. Currently, if timelines continue to unfold as expected, URC could begin collecting ratepayer revenue as soon as November of 2026. If Salt Lake City adopts a participation program ordinance, customers will be automatically enrolled, with the option to opt out at no cost during an initial cancellation period. If a customer opts out at a later period, a termination fee would apply. The URC’s goal is to limit the average household bill increase to no more than $3– $4 per month. To protect low-income customers, the program offers a monthly bill credit of up to $7 and will waive termination fees for those enrolled in Rocky Mountain Power’s Schedule 3 HELP program, with the credit funded by a charge up to $0.70 per month on other participating customers. Goal of the briefing: This briefing is informational only. Following the PSC hearing, if the PSC adopts the Program Application, the Administration will prepare a transmittal for the Council to consider a participation program ordinance. 6. The Council may wish to discuss how they may want to customize the Program Ordinance recitals to reflect Salt Lake City’s energy commitments and policy direction. 7. The Council may wish to ask the administration how many participants are needed to maintain the projected average bill increase of $3–$4 per month for participating households. o What would happen to rates if there are not enough participants? o Should the City advocate for additional mitigation measures if actual costs exceed projections? 8. If a resident currently participates in the BlueSky program, is it anticipated they would leave that to participate in the URC program? 9. The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration what engagement and education efforts they might be planning to ensure Salt Lake City residents have as much notice as possible before a potential RMP fee increase, including the reasoning for that increase, and the timeline. Below is an annotated history of legislative actions taken by the City Council regarding URC: The Council adopted a joint resolution adopting two renewable energy goals.: 1. 50% renewable energy for municipal operations by 2020 2. 100% renewable energy for both municipal operations and the community by 2032 Page | 6 2019 The Council adopted a joint resolution advancing its community goal to 100% net renewable electricity by 2030 which qualified the City to participate in URC. The Council approved a total of $550,000 over FY22 and FY23 to cover the City's share of program developments costs as required by state statute. The actual expense over FY22 and FY23 was approximately $386,000. The Council approved a resolution endorsing the continued participation in the development of the URC program and authorized the Mayor to sign the Utility Agreement with other participating communities. Once the program launches, all Rocky Mountain Power customers located in jurisdictions that adopt Program Ordinances will be automatically enrolled, consistent with provisions in state law allowing customers to opt out at any time. The Agency’s target is to limit the average household bill increase to no more than $3–$4 per month. Customers may opt out at no cost during an initial 100-day cancellation period, which begins when the URC charges first appear on their bills. After that window closes, a termination fee will apply for those who choose to leave the program. The cancelation fee is currently proposed to be $30 for residential customers. To protect households with limited financial resources, the program includes the below low-income customer provisions: Proactive outreach and engagement, Monthly bill credit of up to $7, and Waived termination fees for those who decide to opt out after the initial cancellation period. These protections apply to customers enrolled in Rocky Mountain Power’s Schedule 3 Home Electric Lifeline Plan (HELP). To qualify for the HELP program, customers must be at or below the 150% of Federal Poverty Levels. The low-income bill credit is funded by customers participating in the clean energy program who are not enrolled in Schedule 3. These non-HELP customers will contribute up to $0.70 per month to support income- qualified households. The program ordinance may be modified to tailor certain components to better reflect local priorities and align with City Code. We are prohibited from modifying the overarching parameters of the statewide Program Ordinance without coordination with other URC communities and PSC review/approval. The draft Program Ordinance filed with the PSC consists of two parts: (1) a recitals section and (2) the ordinance itself. Of these, the recitals section provides the greatest flexibility for customization. The recitals can be expanded to incorporate additional “whereas” statements that highlight Salt Lake City’s climate and energy commitments, articulate the City’s rationale for participating in the URC program, and reinforce the City’s long-standing pursuit of clean energy goals. Although state law no longer requires participating communities to adopt a resolution stating a goal of achieving 100% renewable electricity by 2030, the Administration has noted that continuing to include such language would emphasize the City’s enduring commitment to renewable energy. Page | 7 Modifications to the ordinance section itself should be limited to changes necessary to conform with Salt Lake City’s code conventions, such as numbering and formatting. The Administration is evaluating potential adjustments to Sections 7.3 - 7.5 of the draft ordinance to clarify that the City is responsible for paying noticing costs for all customers within Salt Lake City, while removing references to fund appropriations since appropriations are handled through the City’s budget process. Council Participation in the PSC Hearing Next Steps Outline 1 During this time period, they may opt out at no cost. After this period concludes, customers may still opt-out of the program but would be subject to a termination fee currently proposed at $30 for residential accounts. ATTACHMENTS 1 In its testimony in the Program Application docket, URC proposed an even longer no-fee cancelation window of 6 months to the PSC to help ensure that participants have ample time to consider opting out after program-related bill impacts begin. The PSC will ultimately decide the actual duration of the cancelation period as per R746-314-101(3) and subject to statutory requirements. Page | 8 ATTACHMENT 1 Estimated 2026 URC Timeline SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 03/31/2026 Date Sent to Council: 03/31/2026 From: Department * Sustainability Employee Name: O'Malley, Monica E-mail monica.omalley@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 03/31/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 03/31/2026 Subject: Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: Adding the proposed ordinance for consideration (Attachment D). All other information is the same. Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Glade Sowards, Sr. Energy and Climate Program Manager, Glade.Sowards@slc.gov Sophia Nicholas, Deputy Director, Sophia.Nicholas@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Adopt the participation ordinance for the Community Clean Energy Program no later than June 2, 2026. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing Neither the Act nor the Rules require a public hearing for adoption of this ordinance. The Department is supportive of scheduling this item for public comment as timing permits and adopting the ordinance according to the City Council’s established protocol. Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance Background/Discussion Summary of Key Points • With the adoption of Salt Lake City’s net-100% renewable electricity goal in 2016 1, we began working with Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) and other communities to pass legislation in 2019 to facilitate that goal. The passage of HB 411 permitted communities to negotiate a proposed clean energy program with RMP to develop renewable energy resources to serve customers within the communities’ boundaries. • Salt Lake City has been involved in a joint cooperative effort with 18 other communities, informally called the Utah Renewable Communities (URC), to develop a Community Clean Energy Program (Program) pursuant to the 2019 legislation. • The Program was submitted to the Public Service Commission of Utah (PSC) and was approved, with minor modifications, on March 4, 2026. Following the recent PSC approval, all 19 communities involved have to determine whether to enact the Program within our respective boundaries by adopting the program ordinance. • The ordinance adoption process runs 90 days from the PSC order, meaning the ordinance must be adopted no later than June 2, 2026, for Salt Lake City to participate. • The Community Clean Energy Program, should Salt Lake City choose to enact it, will provide a new opportunity for nearly all homes and businesses within Salt Lake City to choose clean energy through their RMP bill. A new line item will be added to customer RMP bills to support the investment in clean energy, with the option for customers to exit at any time. • The Program is still several months from kicking off. We expect customers to see notices by the end of 2026 and the new URC clean energy line item on their bill in early 2027 (at the earliest). • The initial residential rate set by the PSC is $4 per month. • Income-eligible customers can receive a bill credit, enabling them to participate for free. • The Program directly supports the addition of new, utility-scale clean energy to the PacifiCorp grid, and is distinct from other clean energy offerings. • The Community Clean Energy Program ordinance is forthcoming for the Salt Lake City Council to discuss and consider adopting. o If Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance, it will officially bring the Community Clean Energy Program to our community and Salt Lake City will continue to be part of the URC Agency, collaborating with RMP to launch and operate the program. o If Salt Lake City does not adopt the ordinance, the Community Clean Energy Program will not be an option for our community and we will no longer be part of the URC Agency. 1 Joint Resolution 33 of 2016. 2 Legislative Background During the 2019 General Session, the Utah State Legislature passed and the Governor signed HB 411, the Community Renewable Energy Act (Act)2, Utah Code Ann. §§ 54-17-901 to 909 3. The Act created a pathway for communities to work together to establish a community clean energy program in partnership with Rocky Mountain Power (RMP), a subsidiary of PacifiCorp, for residents and businesses in participating communities. The Rules Governing the Community Renewable Energy Program (Rules), Utah Administrative Code R746-314 4, were also adopted in 2019 by the Utah Public Service Commission (PSC) to implement the Act. The Act and associated Rules outline a process whereby interested communities could work with RMP to develop a Program Application that the utility could file with the PSC on behalf of those communities. This effort and program is more frequently called the Utah Renewable Communities (URC). State Code was amended in 2024 5, changing the name to “Community Clean Energy Act”, among other changes. During the 2026 session, additional amendments to this section of code were adopted by the State legislature under HB 238 6, which is pending the Governor’s signature. HB 238 adds specific noticing and opt-out features. These changes are not anticipated to have significant impact on the Program. Communities’ Involvement To pursue this opportunity, and as contemplated by the Act, 23 Utah communities established clean energy goals, taking the first step towards participating in the effort to jointly design a proposed program in partnership with RMP. Eighteen of the original 23 interested communities continued participating by entering into the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement Among Public Entities Regarding the Community Renewable Energy Program (ILA), creating a cooperative of communities called the Community Renewable Energy Agency (Agency, known informally as URC), to jointly make decisions and negotiate with RMP to create the proposed program. Midvale City joined the Agency in 2024, bringing the total number of eligible communities to 19, following a change to the enabling legislation which removed the requirement that a community adopt a clean energy goal before December 31, 2019, in order to be eligible to participate. Each community appoints a primary and alternate board member to the Agency, one of whom should be an elected official. Council Member Dan Dugan represents Salt Lake City on the Agency board and serves as the chair. Three subcommittees were formed by the URC in 2021 to advance program development: the Program Design, Low-Income Plan, and Communications subcommittees. Board members and support staff from URC communities have worked diligently and thoughtfully since 2021 to design the proposed program for submission to the PSC, working closely with the Agency’s legal and technical consultants to negotiate 2 [1] See https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/HB0411.html 3 State Code §54-17-901 to §54-17-901: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title54/Chapter17/54-17-S901.html?v=C54-17- S901_2024050120240501 4 Utah Administrative Code R746-314: https://adminrules.utah.gov/public/rule/R746-314/Current%20Rules 5 See https://le.utah.gov/~2024/bills/static/HB0241.html 6 See https://le.utah.gov/~2026/bills/static/HB0238.html 3 with RMP. Salt Lake City staff have played key roles on all three subcommittees, including leading the Program Design work over the years. What is the Goal of the Program? The goal of the Program is to drive the development of clean, renewable energy resources like solar and wind energy on our grid that would not have been developed otherwise, while keeping the Program affordable and accessible to customers. Ultimately, the target is to develop enough renewable resources to match the amount of electricity used annually by Program participants. While a community is no longer required by state law to have a net-100% renewable electricity goal to have joined the Agency, the Board still aims to push for making net-100% renewable electricity available to homes and businesses in participating communities by 2030; however, this target may be adjusted over time. PacifiCorp is RMP's parent company whose grid serves six states7, including Utah. The clean energy counting towards the Program is proposed to come from both existing clean energy on the grid plus new clean energy projects the Program brings to the grid. These resources are and will be part of the PacifiCorp grid. The Program has been developed and will be implemented in collaboration with RMP, and all URC participants will remain RMP customers. RMP will continue to be required to provide reliable power to all customers, regardless of a customer’s URC participation status. Program Approval by the Utah Public Service Commission As described by step 5 in Attachment A, the Act and Rules required that the proposed program be filed by RMP with the PSC. Following years of careful work and negotiations between the URC and RMP, on January 24, 2025, and June 4, 2025, RMP submitted parts I and II, respectively, of a two-part Application to Implement Community Clean Energy Program Authorized by the Community Clean Energy Act (Docket 25-035-06 8). As required by the Act, the Program Application included, among other items, information about the customers within the boundaries of the participating communities, projected rates under the proposed program, a Utility Agreement between each participating community and RMP, low-income plans for each community, a draft ordinance that establishes an eligible community’s participation in the proposed program, and more. Rounds of direct, rebuttal, and surrebuttal testimony followed. The process concluded with a technical hearing and public witness hearing in front of the Utah Public Service Commission on December 16 and 17, 2025. The Parties to the docket are: RMP, URC, the Division of Public Utilities (DPU), the Office of Consumer Services (OCS), Western Resource Advocates, and the Sierra Club. Each party participated in the rounds of testimony and the hearing. 7 In February 2025, PacifiCorp announced their plans to exit Washington, which will reduce the number of states they operate in to five in the coming years: https://www.pacificorp.com/about/newsroom/news- releases/pacificorp-to-sell-washington-service-area-to-pge.html 8 Docket No: 25-034-06 on the PSC website: https://psc.utah.gov/2025/01/25/docket-no-25-035-06/ 4 On March 4, 2026, a significant milestone was achieved when the Utah Public Service Commission issued an Order9 in Docket 25-035-06 (“Order”) approving the proposed program with modifications. The PSC ruling was generally favorable toward the proposed program and the URC communities’ interests and provides clarity on how the Program will work, the initial cost to participate, and more. However, the PSC did not resolve every dispute URC and RMP raised in the docket. For unresolved items, the Order provided guidance and clear action items for the communities and RMP to move forward. The main issues that still need to be addressed are the resource valuation methodology that considers the financial benefit the new resources bring to non-URC customers, as well as the first resource(s) contract which is called a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). These are discussed in more detail below, in the section “Additional URC Agency Processes.” Ordinance Timeline The PSC approval of the Program on March 4, 2026, set off the 90-day ordinance adoption window, as required by the Act. Each URC community has until June 2, 2026, to pass the required ordinance to formally adopt the Program. Given the Salt Lake City Council’s schedule of public hearings and current workload, we recommend targeting the May 19 formal meeting to adopt the ordinance. In October 2022, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council seeking feedback on the draft model ordinance. The version submitted as part of the Program Application was shared with the Council in October 2025. The ordinance has changed moderately from the last version shared. After the Order, the Agency’s legal counsel updated parts of the ordinance to fully comply with the Order and these redlines were shared with the communities’ legal counsels. It is important that the ordinance remain largely unchanged; particularly the “therefore” clauses and Exhibit A. This is because the ordinance draft submitted to the PSC as part of the Program Application was meant to be indicative of the ordinances to be adopted, pursuant to the Act. Furthermore, the ordinances should remain consistent between the participating communities. The Sustainability Department has updated key “whereas” sections to reflect Salt Lake City’s climate and sustainability goals. Program Details Customer participation and opt-out The Program was established under the Act as an “opt-out” program, meaning that every eligible RMP customer in a community participating in the Program will be automatically enrolled with the option to exit at any time. Customers in these communities will see a new Community Clean Energy Program line item (“Schedule 100”) on their RMP bills as early as the first quarter of 2027 (See Attachment C). The new line item will only appear after certain additional processes by the Agency and RMP are completed and approved by the PSC. This means that if Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance, nearly all RMP customers in our community will be automatically enrolled when the Program commences, likely not until early 2027, with the choice to 9 March 4, 2026 Order: https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/25docs/2503506/3441662503506oapwm3-4-2026.pdf 5 opt out. Customers will be able to exit the Program at any time. There will be an initial “cancellation period” whereby customers exiting the Program can do so without incurring a termination fee. After the “cancellation period,” customers can still exit at any time but will be subject to a termination fee. The termination fees are outlined in Attachment B. Initial Program rates One of the most significant outcomes of the Order is the establishment of the initial Program rate. The Order established an initial residential flat rate totaling $4 per month ($3.88 per month plus a $0.12 low-income program surcharge). This amount is in line with the Agency’s targeted dollar amount to keep the Program affordable and accessible to customers. The low-income proposal from the Agency was also approved by the PSC. Income-qualified residents who are on Schedule 3 (RMP’s Home Electric Lifeline Program, or HELP) will see a monthly rate of $3.88 which would be matched by a $3.88 credit on their bill, making the Program free for these customers. For all other (non-residential) customer classes, the PSC approved a volumetric rate of $0.00609 per kWh and a low-income surcharge of $0.12 per month. Bill impacts for these commercial customers will depend on how much electricity they use each month. Program rates over time Rates will be adjusted periodically (not more than annually) to account for actual customer participation, annual administrative cost true-ups, and the Program valuation and resource costs. Regular rate adjustments happen with all other utility ratemaking and are not unique to the Program. It is not expected that future URC rates will increase significantly from the initial Program rate. Importantly, the PSC in its Order recognized that future rates may even decline as the required administrative and resource reserve funds are established. Page 24 of the PSC order states: While future Program rates may diverge from those under RMP’s proposal contingent on later determinations regarding Resource Valuation and changes to other underlying variables, no evidence in the record suggests that Program rates are likely to meaningfully increase from the initial rates approved in this order. Instead, under RMP’s proposal, they would decrease rather significantly after the first two years. At the Program’s inception, customers will be deciding whether to opt-out with reference to rates that are likely to be higher than rates charged later, after the reserve balances are sufficiently established. While this is not guaranteed and will be influenced by multiple factors including additional future resource procurements, the PSC found it within the public interest to allow the Program to begin with an initial fixed rate of $4 per month. Customer Noticing and Estimated Timelines There are two distinct but important milestones when customers will hear about the Program, defined in the order and State law: 6 • “Program Implementation” happens when the first customer notices are mailed by RMP. • “Program Commencement” is when RMP initiates collection of Program rates. The following is the anticipated timeline for Program milestones: June 2, 2026 Deadline for Communities to Adopt the ordinance (Hard) June - Nov/Dec 2026 RMP upgrades customer service and billing systems (estimated) Nov/Dec 2026 “Program Implementation” – First customer notices (estimated) Nov/Dec 2026 Second customer notices – 15 days after first notices (estimated) Jan/Feb 2027 “Program Commencement” – Program revenue collection begins (estimated) May/June 2027 Free cancellation period ends, termination fees apply (estimated) 2028-2030 Resources begin to come online. Exact timing will depend on resource selection and the terms of its PPA (estimated) Once the ordinance deadline of June 2 passes and RMP concludes its customer service upgrades (i.e. the “Startup Activities”) which are estimated to take approximately five months, RMP customers in a participating community will receive their first official notices about the Program. The first noticing date is defined as the beginning of “Program Implementation.” All RMP customers in communities that adopt the ordinance will receive two notices that are separate from their bills. This includes at least one mailed notice. The second notice will be mailed or digital, depending on customer communication preferences (i.e. if the customer has signed up for online billing.) Large commercial customers on Schedules 8 or 9 that have an electric load of one megawatt or greater will instead receive a noticing meeting, which may be conducted in-person or via video conference. The Agency expects the first customer notices will be mailed in late 2026. As required in the Act and the Utility Agreement, any community that enacts the Program (by passing the ordinance) is responsible for reimbursing RMP for the cost of providing the two required notices to all RMP customers within the community’s boundaries. The Sustainability Department has budgeted accordingly for this expected expense of $156,000. After the first notices go out, there will be two billing cycles, or approximately 60 days, until the first URC clean energy line item appears on RMP customer bills. This period of initial program rate collection is defined as “Program Commencement.” The Agency is estimating that Program Commencement will occur in early 2027. Utah HB 238 from 2026 passed and is currently awaiting the Governor’s signature. This bill adds additional requirements for the customer notices that are not expected to add additional burden to the already planned noticing process. Customers Wishing to Opt Out of the Program Once the Program begins, all customers can always exit it at any time. However, there may be termination fees after a certain time period for certain customers. 7 After “Program Implementation” when the first notices are sent out, customers will have a six-month period during which they can exit the Program for free (this is known as the “Cancellation Period.”) After six months, there will be a $30 termination fee for residential customers. There will be approximately four months during the Cancellation Period when customers will be paying the regular Program rates, but will not incur a termination fee if they choose to exit the Program. Income-qualified customers enrolled in HELP are never subject to a termination fee. Commercial customers will pay a termination fee specific to their particular rate schedule after the Cancellation Period ends. Termination fees are outlined in Attachment B. In addition to the Cancellation Period, the Program includes other circumstances during which the termination fee will not apply, including customers moving out of a participating community, ceasing to be a customer of RMP, or seeking protection through bankruptcy proceedings. New customers moving into a participating community, or annexed into it, will receive their own notice and no-fee cancellation period of 60 days from their first notice about the Program. Additional URC Agency Processes and Resource Solicitation While communities consider adopting the Program ordinance, the URC Agency will be working on several related processes that need to conclude before the Program launches. These include helping RMP upgrade their billing system and set up new customer service support for the Program (these are described in the order as “Startup Activities”.) The funding to backstop these required Startup Activities is the subject of an item in Budget Amendment 5 of FY2026 and is further discussed below. The Agency is also in the middle of a resource solicitation process to determine the first new clean energy resource(s) that will serve the Program. This process has played out separately and ahead of the Program Application. On November 19, 2024, RMP filed an Application for Approval of Solicitation Process 10 with the PSC describing the proposed process to solicit bids from clean energy developers (Docket 24-035-5511). The PSC granted the application12, clearing the way for URC to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) on May 22, 2025 13. Fifteen bids were initially received by the July 10, 2025, RFP deadline, one of which was later withdrawn 14. These bids were evaluated and scored by URC technical consultants, and an “initial short list” of six projects was selected by URC for further evaluation by RMP. URC received the results of this analysis in December 2025 and used this information to create a “final 10 See https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/24docs/2403555/336616Application11-19-2024.pdf 11 Docket No. 24-035-55 on the PSC website: https://psc.utah.gov/2024/11/19/docket-no-24-035-55/ 12 See https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/24docs/2403555/3397642403555ogrmpaam5-13-2025.pdf 13 URC RFP website: https://www.urc2024rfp.com/ 14 URC blog post regarding responses to the RFP: https://www.utahrenewablecommunities.org/post/urc-closes- the-call-for-clean-energy-resources-the-response-was-outstanding 8 short list”. In February 2026, the URC board approved Resolution 2026-0215 selecting all four final short list projects for power purchase agreement (PPA) negotiations. PPA negotiations are currently underway and the process to execute an agreement with one or more projects will eventually coincide with the valuation process, described below, and preparations towards implementing the URC Program. Finally, the Agency is also working with RMP and state agencies to determine how those resources will be valued. A program resource valuation methodology was not determined by the PSC in the Order and will be considered in a future regulatory proceeding. This will be based, in part, upon determinations that RMP and the PSC will make in the utility’s long-range planning effort across its multi-state service territory. This process is called the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The IRP lays out the utility’s forecast load growth over a 20-year timeline and what resources it plans to utilize to serve electricity demand. The IRP process– which culminates in plans that are released every two years and less robust “updates” that are released in intervening, off-cycle years— influences how the utility values new renewable energy brought to the grid. Once the latest version of the IRP is finalized, it will allow the URC and RMP to settle on a valuation methodology for URC clean energy resources going forward, pending PSC approval. What this means for individual customers is not likely to be noticeable, but will mean that the rates will change to a small degree in the future (as do all rates). Program Ordinance Ordinance details There are more details included in the ordinance than may be typical of many Salt Lake City ordinances, including many one-time deadlines and dates that will quickly stale in the code. While a bit awkward, it was decided deliberately by the URC communities to spell out the full details of the Program in the ordinance to offer transparency and clarity in one central location, without requiring community members to track down additional information in the Act, Rules, and Order. While atypical, the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office did not identify any issues with this approach. The ordinance must do two key things: ● Enact the approved program by the eligible community adopting the ordinance; and, ● Make it clear that the PSC has the final say on how the program will work. There are three sections in the ordinance that cover the following: • Preamble: describes the history and context for development of the Program. • Program adoption: while short in length, this is the “action” of the ordinance - that the community’s governing body votes to adopt the Community Clean Energy Program. • Exhibit A describes key elements of the Program that will occur if Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance. This includes: • Establishing Salt Lake City’s participation in the approved Community Clean Energy Program. 15 URC Resolution 2026-02 Resolution of the Board Selecting Projects for Contract Negotiation: https://www.utah.gov/pmn/files/1387795.pdf 9 • Enabling all retail electricity customers in current and future boundaries of Salt Lake City to participate in the Program. This does not include rooftop solar customers on Schedule 135, the older net metering schedule, in accordance with the Act.16 Rooftop solar customers on Schedules 136 and 137 are eligible to participate. • Defining the Program’s “Implementation Date” as the date when RMP sends out its first notices to customers of their forthcoming enrollment in the Program and describing RMP’s noticing requirements. • Explaining that eligible customers will be enrolled in the Program if they decline to opt-out by the date used in the RMP notices. • Describing that any customer in a participating community who is not enrolled in the Program may opt-in at any time. • Imposing termination fees for customers who opt out after the cancellation period as well as situations when termination fees will not occur. • Describing the process and approvals needed for clean energy resource acquisition under the Program. • Acknowledging that the PSC determines the Program rate and can approve adjustments to the rates periodically. • Acknowledging that RMP is responsible for billing customers and notifying them of changes to the Program rate. Section 7 of Exhibit A sets forth Salt Lake City’s role and responsibilities. This includes: • Salt Lake City will continue to participate in future decisions regarding clean energy resource solicitation, acquisition, and other issues. • Salt Lake City’s obligation to enter into an agreement with RMP to effectuate the Program. This “Utility Agreement” was negotiated between RMP and the communities between 2022-23, with the core participation of Salt Lake City staff and attorneys. It was shared with the City Council in October 2023. It was signed by Council Member Dugan, serving as the URC Agency Board Chair, on August 22, 2024, and by Mayor Mendenhall for Salt Lake City on November 26, 2024. The Utility Agreement is consistent for all communities and RMP, as required by the Act. • Per the Utility Agreement, Salt Lake City will reimburse RMP for their costs to provide the two required notices to all eligible customers within our boundary. Funds were first appropriated for this in the Department’s FY24 budget, which has been carried forward as a base budget item each year into the Department’s proposed FY27 base budget. • Salt Lake City has already appropriated and paid additional funds (when we joined the Agency) which, in part, were used to reimburse the OCS and DPU for their costs of contracting third-party expertise to evaluate the Program. Why Create a New Clean Energy Option? Participating Communities, as defined under the Act, are served by RMP – i.e., they do not have their own municipal utilities – and their options for procuring clean energy resources are, therefore, limited. 16 54-17-905(5) states that "a residential customer that is participating in the net metering program under Title 54, Chapter 15, Net Metering of Electricity, may not be a participating customer under this part." 10 The Program offers homes and businesses in our community a new option for supporting clean energy. Furthermore, the Program creates a unique opportunity to drive investment in new clean energy at scale, since, collectively, URC represents about 25% of RMP's electricity sales in Utah 17, which in turn represents 80% of total electricity sales in the State. Benefits of the URC Program Utah is facing a worrisome energy shortage, as our energy supply is projected to decrease while demand continues to rise, according to Governor Cox’s Operation Gigawatt18. Thankfully, URC is part of the solution: the Program will add hundreds of megawatts of new clean energy to the grid in the 2020s, with the aim of adding even more in the next decade to support our communities’ clean energy goals and growing energy needs. By adding new clean energy to our electricity mix, URC is part of the solution by creating a more reliable energy supply for Utah. Health and Environment The electricity used to power our homes and businesses comes from a collection of power plants connected to our grid. This includes electricity generated by natural gas, coal, wind, solar, hydropower, and more. Throughout the day, power plants are dispatched to generate enough electricity to meet demand. Wind and solar power plants have no fuel costs, so they are often dispatched before coal and gas plants which do have fuel costs. When coal and natural gas plants generate electricity, greenhouse gases and air pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere as byproducts. Renewable electricity generation does not come with harmful fossil fuel emissions. By adding more renewable energy to the grid, the URC program may reduce how often fossil fuel plants need to run. This reduces pollution, improving our air quality, water quality, and climate on a local and regional scale. In particular, there are several natural gas plants along the Wasatch Front, owned by RMP or other entities. Due to our state’s increasing electricity demands, these pollution-emitting gas plants will likely need to run more often, which is a particular concern for the Gadsby power plant, given its age and location in the Fairpark neighborhood of Salt Lake City, as well as others that impact our airshed. Adding new, clean energy to the grid helps alleviate overall electricity demand which can result in less air pollution from local fossil fuel power plants. This benefits the neighborhoods immediately next to power plants and those living throughout our inversion-prone valley. Similarly, the Hunter and Huntington coal plants in central Utah are large fossil fuel plants that contribute to air pollution in other parts of the state and reduce visibility in our national parks. The URC program aims to bring more clean energy to reduce pollution throughout the state. The Program ultimately aims to bring online about 500 MW of clean energy over the coming years, based on current participating customer projections. This amount of clean energy, which would occur 17 This estimate is based on the 19 currently participating communities. It is possible that not all 19 communities enact the final program by passing the ordinance 18 Information on Operation Gigawatt: https://energy.utah.gov/homepage/about-us/operation-gigawatt/ 11 over several different resource procurements, would result in an estimated reduction of 1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution annually, and 1,000 pounds of criteria pollution annually.19 Economic Growth The Program supports economic growth by bringing new energy development to areas of the state that are hotspots for solar, wind, or other clean energy development. (Note that Salt Lake County is not a prime location for utility-scale solar and wind.) New projects create construction and operational jobs; provide resources to public schools via the Trust Lands Administration if projects are sited on certain state land; support private landowners if sited privately; and add to local counties’ tax base. These benefits were captured in a recent study by The Western Way20. Supporting a healthy environment is also core to many economic drivers in Utah– whether that’s the local ski and snow sports industry, national park visitation in gateway communities, or the upcoming 2034 Olympic & Paralympic Games. In fact, the Program is a cornerstone of the sustainability goals of Utah’s bid to the International Olympic Committee.21 Program comparison Homes and businesses have a few different ways to access clean energy. The Program is distinct from existing clean energy offerings: • The Blue Sky program has been available for nearly 26 years and allows participants to voluntarily contribute at $1.95 per 100 kWh “block” or 1.95 cents per kWh. Blue Sky is an important program that supports grants to help organizations offset the cost of rooftop solar (Salt Lake City has benefitted from a Blue Sky grant which helped cover the cost of solar on the Sorenson Center). Blue Sky participants also fund the purchase of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) nationwide which, while helpful to the industry, do not significantly catalyze the growth of new utility-scale renewable energy. Blue Sky is also more expensive on a per kilowatt-hour basis than the initial residential Program rate of $4 per month per residential customer approved by the PSC (0.609 cents per kWh for the average residential consumption of 637 kWh per month, plus a 12 cent per month surcharge charged to participants to assist low-income customers). This is, in part, due to key differences between the programs, including Blue Sky’s ability to claim RECs, while URC is aiming to use its rate revenue to develop new clean energy to match participant demand. • The Subscriber Solar Program is also one that Salt Lake City Corporation participates in. It offers RMP customers shares in an existing 20 MW solar farm in Southern Utah. While allowing customers to directly purchase a share of clean energy is an important benefit compared with Blue Sky, Subscriber Solar has a capped participation opportunity and RMP has not indicated they plan to build more projects to make available to additional subscribers. 19 Source: EPA’s AVERT model. https://www.epa.gov/avert 20 The Economic Benefits of Utah’s Rural Renewable Energy Industry: https://www.thewesternway.org/ut-eco-devo 21 "SALT LAKE CITY—UTAH COMMITTEE FOR THE GAMES Future Host Questionnaire Response" https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Future-Host/SLC-UT-2034-Future-Host- Questionnaire-Response.pdf : Pages 24, 46, 57 12 • Customers can individually install rooftop solar on their homes or businesses. This is an important option to support renewable energy growth and energy security. However, it is expensive and only available to some types of customers with the funding and property types that allow for it. For these reasons, Salt Lake City and the other participating communities that are part of URC have worked diligently to develop the Community Clean Energy Program with RMP over the last several years. The Program offers participating communities the opportunity to drive renewable energy development at utility scale and offers their residents and businesses the choice to participate. If the ordinance is not adopted, that choice is removed for them. History of Salt Lake City’s support Salt Lake City joint resolution Number 33 of 2016, adopted November 1, 2016 (“2016 Resolution”) established two renewable energy goals – one for Salt Lake City’s government operations and another for the wider Salt Lake City community. For government operations, the 2016 resolution established a goal to achieve at least 50% municipal renewable energy by 2020. It also established 2032 as the year to achieve 100% renewable energy for both government operations and the community. The community goal was advanced to 2030 in Joint Resolution 23 of 2019, which established “a community goal of achieving an amount equivalent to 100% of the annual electric energy supply for participating customers from renewable energy resources by 2030.” By adopting this latter resolution, Salt Lake City qualified under the Act to join the URC and develop the Program in partnership with RMP. Subsequently, Salt Lake City made financial contributions totaling $385,966.47 in Fiscal Years 2022 and 2023 to the Agency’s budget, which were proportional to our community’s population and electricity load. The Rules require participating communities to pay for program development and implementation costs incurred by the utility and regulators to avoid shifting costs to non-participating customers. On August 3, 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted Resolution 22 of 2023 endorsing the City’s ongoing participation in the development of the Program, and following that, Mayor Mendenhall signed the Utility Agreement along with the other participating communities. RMP is expected to sign the Utility Agreement soon now that the PSC has issued the Order. Transmittals shared with Council In addition to actions taken above, we are sharing the most recent transmittals on this program over the last few years, as reference: • In October 2022, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council seeking feedback on the draft model ordinance and approaches to low-income assistance. • In October 2023, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council providing a copy of the Utility Agreement. • In December 2024, the Department submitted an informational transmittal giving an update on Program milestones. • In October 2025, the Department provided a transmittal updating the City Council on the Program Application and Solicitation processes and expected next steps, should the PSC approve the Program. 13 Budgetary Updates The Agency will begin to receive Program rate revenue after RMP begins revenue collection, anticipated in early 2027 according to the timeline above and in Attachment C. To date, Program costs have been paid for from member communities contributions. URC has also been successful in receiving one grant and a financial donation to support its efforts over the last year. Because the Agency unexpectedly had to run its own resource solicitation process, it charged bid fees from developer applicants to pay for consultants to run the solicitation and other legal and technical costs. The Agency has remaining budget to fund expected activities through 2026, and URC support staff continues to seek philanthropic opportunities to continue funding URC work to bridge any gaps until revenue collection begins. If additional funds are requested of member communities, which the Sustainability Department cannot cover with existing budget for Salt Lake City’s share, the Sustainability Department will prepare a budget amendment. As noted in the transmittal sent to the City Council in December 2024 and in the section below, there is a separate outstanding issue of unexpected administrative “Startup Costs.” Sustainability has included a funding request in FY26 Budget Amendment 5 to backstop the cost of these activities. Once revenue collection begins, all other costs associated with administering the program and for program resources will be covered by participating RMP customers and there is no further community obligation. Startup Costs There are certain customer service activities, with associated costs, that need to occur in order for RMP to send out bills with the Program line item, thus allowing the Program to commence. These activities can be paid for by ratepayer revenues, but those cannot be collected before such activities occur. Accordingly, these activities are called “Startup Activities” and their associated costs, “Startup Costs”. The most significant Startup Cost is an upgrade to RMP’s information systems to automate statutory aspects of the Program, namely, to: • allow Program-eligible customers to opt-out one or more of their electric accounts; • generate ongoing opt-out notices for new Program-eligible customers; and • assess any applicable termination fees. Other costs include setting up a 1-800 number for customer support, customer service training, and other miscellaneous costs. The total Startup Cost estimate provided to the PSC as part of the Program approval docket was $820,169. Unfortunately, RMP did not initially identify these Startup Costs as an expense that the URC would need to cover. For that reason, the URC’s initial $700,000 budget—fully funded through contributions by its 19 member communities—was not designed to cover it. Additionally, the Rules adopted by the PSC say that costs related to operation of the Program should be recovered through the Program rate paid by participating customers – not the participating communities. Further, neither the Act nor Rules allow Program-related costs like this to be shifted to non-participating customers. If these Program-related costs are included in the established rate, RMP has expressed 14 concern that the liability for the Startup Costs could be shifted to all customers if a majority of URC customers opt out of the Program. This is an extremely low likelihood event, but RMP has required that URC’s member communities sign an agreement, in advance, to cover the Startup Costs if those costs have not been recovered through Program rates after an agreed timeframe. The nature and estimated amounts of the Startup Costs were discussed in the Program Approval docket, with cost estimates and challenges made before the PSC. Ultimately, the PSC, in approving the program, acknowledged that the Startup Costs could be paid for up-front by RMP, but would need to be reimbursed, either by ratepayer revenues, or a URC community, so as not to shift costs to other RMP customers. Recognizing that Salt Lake City is the community with the largest population and electricity load of all 19 URC communities and could thus most benefit from the Program’s impact, the Sustainability Department agreed to request budget allocation that could be obligated, allowing Salt Lake City to sign such a contract with Rocky Mountain Power. As confirmed in recent conversations with RMP staff, the Startup Costs will remain approximately the same whether solely Salt Lake City participates in the program, or all 19 communities. The Startup Cost estimate we are using for Budget Amendment 5 is the one RMP provided to the PSC of $820,169, plus an additional 10% contingency. While this number is an estimate and actual costs would vary, we believe it is on the higher end of what would be required, allowing us to move forward contractually. Furthermore, it is very unlikely that Salt Lake City would end up needing to pay this money to RMP. Rather, it is being identified and held as a backstop in order to sign the Startup Cost agreement. That is because it is estimated the Program could generate around $18 million in revenues each year at the PSC-approved initial rate of $4 per month for residential customers and $0.00609 per kWh for non- residential customers. At these rates, it is likely that the Startup Cost estimate of $820,169 will be more than recovered from a single month of Program revenue. Given RMP’s requirement that a contract be in place and the high likelihood that the full cost will be recovered through one month of Program revenues, it is very likely that this Startup Cost budget can be de-obligated shortly after Program revenue collection begins. These details have been worked into the contractual language that is currently being negotiated with RMP. Salt Lake City is separately talking with other communities that are part of the Agency on their potential contributions to reimburse the City, in the case that the Startup Costs are collected. Conclusion After nearly a decade of thoughtful, intentional, and complex work to plan, design, negotiate, and apply for approval, the Community Clean Energy Program has been approved by the PSC. This milestone starts a 90-day clock for each of the 19 communities involved in URC to consider enacting the approved Program by adopting the program ordinance by June 2, 2026. If adopted, the first customer notices are 15 expected to go out in late 2026, and the new clean energy line item will appear in early 2027 on customers’ RMP bills. This page has intentionally been left blank ATTACHMENT A This page has intentionally been left blank ATTACHMENT B Information on termination fees included in the Program Application This page has intentionally been left blank Estimated 2026-27 URC Timeline PROGRAM: v PSC program approval: (March 4, 2026) 1 v Ordinance adoption (within 90 days of PSC approval: ends June 2,2026) 2 v RMP preps billing system (5 months following adoption window) 3 Noticing period (60 days following implementation) 4 No fee opt-out period (~ 4 months following commencement) 5 Fee-Free Cancellation Period of 6 months "Implementation Date" Noticing begins (~November 2, 2026) "Commencement Date" Revenue collection begins (~January 1, 2027) “Implementation” = when customer noticing begins. Currently estimated in late 2026 “Commencement” = when rate collection begins. Currently estimated in early 2027 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ____ of 2026 (Enacting Title 9, Chapter 50 to the Salt Lake City Code, Community Clean Energy Program) WHEREAS, in 2019, the Utah State Legislature enacted House Bill 411, codified at Utah Code Ann. §§ 54-17-901 to -909 (“Act”), titled the “Community Renewable Energy Act”; and WHEREAS, in 2024, the Utah State Legislature enacted House Bill 241 and Senate Bill 214 which, collectively, renamed the Act the “Community Clean Energy Act” and amended certain provisions of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the Utah Public Service Commission (“Commission”) to approve a program (“Program”) negotiated by towns, municipalities, and counties with qualified utilities to provide electric energy from clean energy resources for participating customers; and WHEREAS, the Act further authorizes the Commission to adopt administrative rules to implement the Act and the Commission has adopted such rules as set forth in Utah Administrative Code R746-314-101 through -402 (“Rules”); and WHEREAS, the Rules require that, in addition to the requirements of the Act, the Community which may be served by the Program also adopts an agreement (“Governance Agreement”) with other eligible Communities to establish a cooperative decision-making process for Program design, resource solicitation, resource acquisition, and other Program issues and provides a means of ensuring that eligible Communities and those that become participating Communities will be able to reach a single joint decision on any necessary Program issues; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of the Rules, Salt Lake City entered into an agreement with other eligible Communities entitled the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement Among Public Entities Regarding the Community Renewable Energy Program (“Governance Agreement”), thereby becoming a member of the Community Renewable Energy Agency (“Agency”), which endeavors to make certain joint decisions about the proposed Program on behalf of all Communities; and WHEREAS, the Act and Rules further specifies a requirement that the Community must enter into an agreement with a qualified utility (“Utility Agreement”) whereby the Community stipulates to pay certain costs associated with establishing the Program, determines the obligation of payment for termination charges that are not paid through participating customers, and identifies any initially proposed replaced assets; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of the Act, Salt Lake City executed a Utility Agreement with Rocky Mountain Power, a qualified utility under the Act, on November 26, 2024, which addresses the issues required by the Act; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of the Act, on January 24, 2025, and June 4, 2 2025, Rocky Mountain Power filed an application with the Commission seeking approval of the Program and the Commission opened Docket No. 25-035-06 to consider the application; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of the Act, on March 4, 2026, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 25-035-06 (“Commission Order”) approving the Program; and WHEREAS, the Act further provides that a Community must, within ninety (90) days after the date of the Commission’s order approving the Program, adopt a local ordinance (“Program Ordinance”) that establishes the Community’s participation in the Program and is consistent with the Utility Agreement, if the Community desires that the Program be available to customers of the qualified utility residing or operating within its boundaries; and WHEREAS, following the approval of the Commission Order on March 4, 2026, Salt Lake City must adopt a Program Ordinance no later than June 2, 2026, if it desires to adopt the Program for electric customers within Salt Lake City boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council desires to take actions which it has determined promotes the health, safety and welfare of Salt Lake City’s residents; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council finds that energy sources utilized by and within Salt Lake City can impact public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has determined that adoption of this ordinance will help address public health and welfare concerns related to poor air quality and other environmental concerns arising in part from the use of fossil fuels; and WHEREAS, recent advances in energy technology have made certain clean energy resources more economically viable than in the past and, in some cases, more cost-effective than traditional energy sources; and WHEREAS, proximity to outdoor recreation, which is critical to public welfare and is a key economic contributor to Salt Lake City, relies on preservation of the environment and protection of natural resources; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council has determined that adoption of this ordinance will enhance the economic well-being of Salt Lake City and its residents through prudent management of Salt Lake City’s financial resources; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City and its residents have shown an interest in environmental stewardship through various initiatives and activities surrounding growth and development; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Joint Resolution No. 33 of 2016, adopted November 1, 2016, established two renewable energy goals: (1) to achieve at least 50% municipal renewable energy by 2020, and (2) to achieve 100% renewable energy for both municipal operations and the community by 2032; and 3 WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Joint Resolution No. 23 of 2019, adopted August 27, 2019, advanced the previously established community energy goal, striving to achieve an amount equivalent to 100% of the annual electric energy supply for participating customers from renewable energy resources by 2030, thereby qualifying Salt Lake City under the Act to participate in the Program; and WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Resolution No. 22 of 2023, adopted July 18, 2023, endorsed the City’s ongoing participation in the development of the Program; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council believes that determining and undertaking further actions designed to reduce fossil fuel dependence while appropriately balancing financial stewardship and promoting economic growth is an important component of safeguarding public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council met in regular session on ______________, 2026, to, among other things, consider adopting the Program on behalf of Salt Lake City’s electric customers; and WHEREAS, as contemplated in the Act, the Salt Lake City Council desires to adopt the attached Program Ordinance that satisfies the requirements of the Act and adopts the Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption. Salt Lake City Code, Title 9, Chapter 50, Community Clean Energy Program, which is published as a code in book form, is adopted in accordance with Exhibit A herein, copies of which have been filed for use and examination in the Office of the City Recorder (the “Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance”). Section 2. Savings Clause. In the event one or more of the provisions of this Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance shall, for any reason, be held to be unenforceable or invalid in any respect under applicable laws, such unenforceability or invalidity shall not affect any other provision; and in such an event, this Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance shall be construed as if such unenforceable or invalid provision had never been contained herein. Section 3. Effective Date. This Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the date of its first publication. 4 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _____ day of ______________, 2026. ATTEST: _________________________ __________________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder CHAIRPERSON Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Bill No. _______ of 2026. Published: __________________ Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office 5 EXHIBIT A TITLE 9 CHAPTER 50 COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM 9.50.010: SALT LAKE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM: A. Salt Lake City hereby establishes its participation in the Community Clean Energy Program (“Program”) as approved by the Public Service Commission of Utah (“Commission”). B. The Commission has adopted such rules as set forth in Utah Administrative Code R746-314-101 through -402 (“Rules”). On March 4, 2026, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 25-035-06 (“Commission Order”) approving the Program. The Commission Order is on file with the Commission. The Program’s rates and requirements are governed by the Commission Order, and may be modified from time to time by subsequent Rules and orders adopted by the Commission. To the extent that the Commission Order or any subsequent Rule or order adopted by the Commission contradicts any portion of this Title, the Commission order or Rule or order adopted by the Commission shall govern. C. ELIGIBLE CUSTOMERS. Pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 54-17-905(5), residential customers participating in the net metering program under Utah Code Title 54, Chapter 15, Net Metering of Electricity, Rocky Mountain Power Schedule 135, are not eligible to participate in the Program. All other retail electric customers of Rocky Mountain Power (“RMP”) within the current and future boundaries of Salt Lake City, including all residential, commercial, and industrial customers, are eligible to participate in the Program (“Eligible Customer”). Eligible Customers include rooftop solar customers on Rocky Mountain Power Schedules 136 and 137, which are compensated through an export credit rather than a net metering schedule. D. IMPLEMENTATION DATE. The Program shall be implemented on the date that RMP sends out the first Notices identified in section 9.50.020 (“Program Implementation Date”). Eligible Customers shall be enrolled in the Program if they receive the Notices and decline to opt out of participation in the Program by the date set forth in the Notices. Consistent with the Act and the Rules, the Notices shall be sent to each Eligible Customer before the commencement date that applies to each such customer (“Customer Commencement Date”), as set forth in the Rules. 9.50.020: CUSTOMER PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY CLEAN ENERGY PROGRAM: A. Each Eligible Customer shall be automatically enrolled in the Program unless the customer opts out of the Program prior to the Customer Commencement Date. B. NOTICES. As set forth in the Act and the Rules before any Eligible Customer becomes a participant in the Program, RMP first shall deliver to each Eligible Customer certain 6 notices (collectively, the “Notices”) containing content and in the form, manner, and delivery method as required by the Act and Rules and other orders and Rules. C. OPT-OUT. Each Eligible Customer may elect not to participate in the Program and instead to pay applicable existing electric rates by giving notice to RMP in the manner and within the time period set forth in the Notices. 1. FIRST OPT-OUT NOTICE. RMP shall provide a First Opt-Out Notice, separate from standard monthly bills, to each Eligible Customer within Salt Lake City, no earlier than sixty (60) days and no later than thirty (30) days before the Customer Commencement Date applicable to each customer. The First Opt-Out Notice shall, in all material respects, use the form and content of the First Opt-Out Notice as approved by the Commission. 2. SECOND OPT-OUT NOTICE. RMP shall provide a Second Opt-Out Notice, separate from standard monthly bills, to each Eligible Customer within Salt Lake City, at least fifteen (15) days after the First Opt-Out Notice was provided and at least seven (7) days before the Customer Commencement Date applicable to such customer. The Second Opt-Out Notice shall, in all material respects, use the form and content of the Second Opt-Out Notice as approved by the Commission. 3. Each Eligible Customer that receives the First Opt-Out Notice and the Second Opt-Out Notice as described herein and declines to opt out of the Program by the customer’s Customer Commencement Date will be enrolled in the Program. D. CUSTOMER OPTION TO OPT IN TO PROGRAM. An Eligible Customer located within Salt Lake City that is not enrolled in the Program may at any time elect to participate in the Program by providing notice to RMP in the form and content approved by the Commission. Following such notice to opt in to the Program, the customer will be enrolled in the Program starting with the billing period following the notice in which it is reasonably practicable for RMP to enroll such customer. The reasonably practicable billing period shall be based on when the notice was received from the customer and the customer’s billing cycle. Following enrollment in the Program, the customer shall be subject to all Program requirements E. CUSTOMER OPTION TO EXIT PROGRAM. Customers enrolled in the Program may exit the Program by giving notice to RMP. 9.50.030: TERMINATION FEES: A. If a customer declines to opt out of the Program prior to the applicable Customer Commencement Date, but subsequently exits the Program, the exiting customer may be required to pay a termination fee, as set forth in this section and further specified by the Rules and the Commission Order. B. When applicable, the amount of the termination fee shall be based on the rate schedule of the exiting customer as approved by the Commission and may be modified from time to time by subsequent orders of the Commission. 7 C. CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH TERMINATION FEE SHALL NOT APPLY: A termination fee shall not apply in the following circumstances: 1. any customer that opts out of the Program within the “Cancellation Period” applicable to that customer, as defined in the Rules. 2. any customer that ceases to be an electric customer of RMP; 3. any customer that moves to a new location that is not within the boundaries of a community that participates in the Program; 4. any customer that seeks protection through bankruptcy proceedings; or 5. any customer enrolled in Rocky Mountain Schedule 3 bill assistance (“Low- Income Lifeline Program”). 9.50.040: ACQUISITION OF CLEAN ENERGY RESOURCES: A. For purposes of this section, “clean energy resource” shall have the definition set forth in the Act. B. RMP may adopt or procure one or more clean energy resources to serve the needs and goals of the Program. The acquisition of any such clean energy resource must follow solicitation application and evaluation criteria approved by the Commission. C. Any clean energy resource adopted or procured by RMP to serve the needs and goals of the Program must be approved by the Commission based on a finding the same is reasonable and in the public interest. D. The Commission shall determine the method of cost recovery for any clean energy resource acquired to meet Program needs and goals, and the Commission’s determination regarding cost recovery may affect Program rates. 9.50.050: PROGRAM RATES AND RATE ADJUSTMENT FILINGS: A. Program rates will be determined by the Commission. B. The initial Program rates were determined by the Commission in the Commission Order. C. Program rates may be adjusted by the Commission from time to time, consistent with the procedures approved by the Commission for adjusting Program rates. 9.50.060: UTILITY BILLING FOR PARTICIPATING CUSTOMERS: A. RMP shall bill each Participating Customer on a monthly basis and shall: 1. include information in its monthly bills to participating customers 8 identifying the Program cost; and 2. provide notice to participating customers of any change in rates for participation in the Program. 9.50.070: SALT LAKE CITY PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM: A. Through its membership in the Community Renewable Energy Agency, Salt Lake City participated in the design and approval of the Program and shall participate in future decisions regarding clean energy resource solicitation, clean energy resource acquisition, and certain other Program issues. B. Consistent with Utah Code Ann. § 54-17-903(2)(a), Salt Lake City entered into an agreement with RMP regarding the facilitation of the Program (“Utility Agreement”). Pursuant to the Utility Agreement: 1. Salt Lake City shall pay for the costs of third-party expertise contracted for in connection with the Program’s development and initial approval by the Commission; 2. Salt Lake City shall pay its proportional costs associated with RMP providing the Notices to the Salt Lake City customers as discussed in section 9.50.020; 3. termination fees not paid by a participating customer shall be included in participating customer rates and shall not be paid by Salt Lake City; 4. there shall be no initially proposed “Replaced Asset” as that term is defined by Utah Code Ann. § 54-17-902(15). C. Salt Lake City has already approved the appropriation of funds and has already paid those funds to the Agency for the Agency to make payments for the costs of third-party expertise contracted for in connection with the Program’s development and initial approval by the Commission pursuant to the Governance Agreement. D. Salt Lake City has approved the appropriation of funds to pay its proportional costs associated with RMP providing the Notices to Salt Lake City customers as discussed in section 9.50.020. E. Salt Lake City shall not be obligated to pay any costs of the Program other than those costs set forth herein and any costs that Salt Lake City may bear as a utility customer that participates in the Program, if applicable. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 03/27/2026 Date Sent to Council: 03/27/2026 From: Department * Sustainability Employee Name: O'Malley, Monica E-mail monica.omalley@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 03/27/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 03/27/2026 Subject: Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Glade Sowards, Sr. Energy and Climate Program Manager, Glade.Sowards@slc.gov Sophia Nicholas, Deputy Director, Sophia.Nicholas@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Adopt the participation ordinance for the Community Clean Energy Program no later than June 2, 2026. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing Neither the Act nor the Rules require a public hearing for adoption of this ordinance. The Department is supportive of scheduling this item for public comment as timing permits and adopting the ordinance according to the City Council’s established protocol. Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank 1 Community Clean Energy Program Ordinance Background/Discussion Summary of Key Points • With the adoption of Salt Lake City’s net-100% renewable electricity goal in 2016 1, we began working with Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) and other communities to pass legislation in 2019 to facilitate that goal. The passage of HB 411 permitted communities to negotiate a proposed clean energy program with RMP to develop renewable energy resources to serve customers within the communities’ boundaries. • Salt Lake City has been involved in a joint cooperative effort with 18 other communities, informally called the Utah Renewable Communities (URC), to develop a Community Clean Energy Program (Program) pursuant to the 2019 legislation. • The Program was submitted to the Public Service Commission of Utah (PSC) and was approved, with minor modifications, on March 4, 2026. Following the recent PSC approval, all 19 communities involved have to determine whether to enact the Program within our respective boundaries by adopting the program ordinance. • The ordinance adoption process runs 90 days from the PSC order, meaning the ordinance must be adopted no later than June 2, 2026, for Salt Lake City to participate. • The Community Clean Energy Program, should Salt Lake City choose to enact it, will provide a new opportunity for nearly all homes and businesses within Salt Lake City to choose clean energy through their RMP bill. A new line item will be added to customer RMP bills to support the investment in clean energy, with the option for customers to exit at any time. • The Program is still several months from kicking off. We expect customers to see notices by the end of 2026 and the new URC clean energy line item on their bill in early 2027 (at the earliest). • The initial residential rate set by the PSC is $4 per month. • Income-eligible customers can receive a bill credit, enabling them to participate for free. • The Program directly supports the addition of new, utility-scale clean energy to the PacifiCorp grid, and is distinct from other clean energy offerings. • The Community Clean Energy Program ordinance is forthcoming for the Salt Lake City Council to discuss and consider adopting. o If Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance, it will officially bring the Community Clean Energy Program to our community and Salt Lake City will continue to be part of the URC Agency, collaborating with RMP to launch and operate the program. o If Salt Lake City does not adopt the ordinance, the Community Clean Energy Program will not be an option for our community and we will no longer be part of the URC Agency. 1 Joint Resolution 33 of 2016. 2 Legislative Background During the 2019 General Session, the Utah State Legislature passed and the Governor signed HB 411, the Community Renewable Energy Act (Act)2, Utah Code Ann. §§ 54-17-901 to 909 3. The Act created a pathway for communities to work together to establish a community clean energy program in partnership with Rocky Mountain Power (RMP), a subsidiary of PacifiCorp, for residents and businesses in participating communities. The Rules Governing the Community Renewable Energy Program (Rules), Utah Administrative Code R746-314 4, were also adopted in 2019 by the Utah Public Service Commission (PSC) to implement the Act. The Act and associated Rules outline a process whereby interested communities could work with RMP to develop a Program Application that the utility could file with the PSC on behalf of those communities. This effort and program is more frequently called the Utah Renewable Communities (URC). State Code was amended in 2024 5, changing the name to “Community Clean Energy Act”, among other changes. During the 2026 session, additional amendments to this section of code were adopted by the State legislature under HB 238 6, which is pending the Governor’s signature. HB 238 adds specific noticing and opt-out features. These changes are not anticipated to have significant impact on the Program. Communities’ Involvement To pursue this opportunity, and as contemplated by the Act, 23 Utah communities established clean energy goals, taking the first step towards participating in the effort to jointly design a proposed program in partnership with RMP. Eighteen of the original 23 interested communities continued participating by entering into the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement Among Public Entities Regarding the Community Renewable Energy Program (ILA), creating a cooperative of communities called the Community Renewable Energy Agency (Agency, known informally as URC), to jointly make decisions and negotiate with RMP to create the proposed program. Midvale City joined the Agency in 2024, bringing the total number of eligible communities to 19, following a change to the enabling legislation which removed the requirement that a community adopt a clean energy goal before December 31, 2019, in order to be eligible to participate. Each community appoints a primary and alternate board member to the Agency, one of whom should be an elected official. Council Member Dan Dugan represents Salt Lake City on the Agency board and serves as the chair. Three subcommittees were formed by the URC in 2021 to advance program development: the Program Design, Low-Income Plan, and Communications subcommittees. Board members and support staff from URC communities have worked diligently and thoughtfully since 2021 to design the proposed program for submission to the PSC, working closely with the Agency’s legal and technical consultants to negotiate 2 [1] See https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/HB0411.html 3 State Code §54-17-901 to §54-17-901: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title54/Chapter17/54-17-S901.html?v=C54-17- S901_2024050120240501 4 Utah Administrative Code R746-314: https://adminrules.utah.gov/public/rule/R746-314/Current%20Rules 5 See https://le.utah.gov/~2024/bills/static/HB0241.html 6 See https://le.utah.gov/~2026/bills/static/HB0238.html 3 with RMP. Salt Lake City staff have played key roles on all three subcommittees, including leading the Program Design work over the years. What is the Goal of the Program? The goal of the Program is to drive the development of clean, renewable energy resources like solar and wind energy on our grid that would not have been developed otherwise, while keeping the Program affordable and accessible to customers. Ultimately, the target is to develop enough renewable resources to match the amount of electricity used annually by Program participants. While a community is no longer required by state law to have a net-100% renewable electricity goal to have joined the Agency, the Board still aims to push for making net-100% renewable electricity available to homes and businesses in participating communities by 2030; however, this target may be adjusted over time. PacifiCorp is RMP's parent company whose grid serves six states7, including Utah. The clean energy counting towards the Program is proposed to come from both existing clean energy on the grid plus new clean energy projects the Program brings to the grid. These resources are and will be part of the PacifiCorp grid. The Program has been developed and will be implemented in collaboration with RMP, and all URC participants will remain RMP customers. RMP will continue to be required to provide reliable power to all customers, regardless of a customer’s URC participation status. Program Approval by the Utah Public Service Commission As described by step 5 in Attachment A, the Act and Rules required that the proposed program be filed by RMP with the PSC. Following years of careful work and negotiations between the URC and RMP, on January 24, 2025, and June 4, 2025, RMP submitted parts I and II, respectively, of a two-part Application to Implement Community Clean Energy Program Authorized by the Community Clean Energy Act (Docket 25-035-06 8). As required by the Act, the Program Application included, among other items, information about the customers within the boundaries of the participating communities, projected rates under the proposed program, a Utility Agreement between each participating community and RMP, low-income plans for each community, a draft ordinance that establishes an eligible community’s participation in the proposed program, and more. Rounds of direct, rebuttal, and surrebuttal testimony followed. The process concluded with a technical hearing and public witness hearing in front of the Utah Public Service Commission on December 16 and 17, 2025. The Parties to the docket are: RMP, URC, the Division of Public Utilities (DPU), the Office of Consumer Services (OCS), Western Resource Advocates, and the Sierra Club. Each party participated in the rounds of testimony and the hearing. 7 In February 2025, PacifiCorp announced their plans to exit Washington, which will reduce the number of states they operate in to five in the coming years: https://www.pacificorp.com/about/newsroom/news- releases/pacificorp-to-sell-washington-service-area-to-pge.html 8 Docket No: 25-034-06 on the PSC website: https://psc.utah.gov/2025/01/25/docket-no-25-035-06/ 4 On March 4, 2026, a significant milestone was achieved when the Utah Public Service Commission issued an Order9 in Docket 25-035-06 (“Order”) approving the proposed program with modifications. The PSC ruling was generally favorable toward the proposed program and the URC communities’ interests and provides clarity on how the Program will work, the initial cost to participate, and more. However, the PSC did not resolve every dispute URC and RMP raised in the docket. For unresolved items, the Order provided guidance and clear action items for the communities and RMP to move forward. The main issues that still need to be addressed are the resource valuation methodology that considers the financial benefit the new resources bring to non-URC customers, as well as the first resource(s) contract which is called a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). These are discussed in more detail below, in the section “Additional URC Agency Processes.” Ordinance Timeline The PSC approval of the Program on March 4, 2026, set off the 90-day ordinance adoption window, as required by the Act. Each URC community has until June 2, 2026, to pass the required ordinance to formally adopt the Program. Given the Salt Lake City Council’s schedule of public hearings and current workload, we recommend targeting the May 19 formal meeting to adopt the ordinance. In October 2022, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council seeking feedback on the draft model ordinance. The version submitted as part of the Program Application was shared with the Council in October 2025. The ordinance has changed moderately from the last version shared. After the Order, the Agency’s legal counsel updated parts of the ordinance to fully comply with the Order and these redlines were shared with the communities’ legal counsels. It is important that the ordinance remain largely unchanged; particularly the “therefore” clauses and Exhibit A. This is because the ordinance draft submitted to the PSC as part of the Program Application was meant to be indicative of the ordinances to be adopted, pursuant to the Act. Furthermore, the ordinances should remain consistent between the participating communities. The Sustainability Department has updated key “whereas” sections to reflect Salt Lake City’s climate and sustainability goals. Program Details Customer participation and opt-out The Program was established under the Act as an “opt-out” program, meaning that every eligible RMP customer in a community participating in the Program will be automatically enrolled with the option to exit at any time. Customers in these communities will see a new Community Clean Energy Program line item (“Schedule 100”) on their RMP bills as early as the first quarter of 2027 (See Attachment C). The new line item will only appear after certain additional processes by the Agency and RMP are completed and approved by the PSC. This means that if Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance, nearly all RMP customers in our community will be automatically enrolled when the Program commences, likely not until early 2027, with the choice to 9 March 4, 2026 Order: https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/25docs/2503506/3441662503506oapwm3-4-2026.pdf 5 opt out. Customers will be able to exit the Program at any time. There will be an initial “cancellation period” whereby customers exiting the Program can do so without incurring a termination fee. After the “cancellation period,” customers can still exit at any time but will be subject to a termination fee. The termination fees are outlined in Attachment B. Initial Program rates One of the most significant outcomes of the Order is the establishment of the initial Program rate. The Order established an initial residential flat rate totaling $4 per month ($3.88 per month plus a $0.12 low-income program surcharge). This amount is in line with the Agency’s targeted dollar amount to keep the Program affordable and accessible to customers. The low-income proposal from the Agency was also approved by the PSC. Income-qualified residents who are on Schedule 3 (RMP’s Home Electric Lifeline Program, or HELP) will see a monthly rate of $3.88 which would be matched by a $3.88 credit on their bill, making the Program free for these customers. For all other (non-residential) customer classes, the PSC approved a volumetric rate of $0.00609 per kWh and a low-income surcharge of $0.12 per month. Bill impacts for these commercial customers will depend on how much electricity they use each month. Program rates over time Rates will be adjusted periodically (not more than annually) to account for actual customer participation, annual administrative cost true-ups, and the Program valuation and resource costs. Regular rate adjustments happen with all other utility ratemaking and are not unique to the Program. It is not expected that future URC rates will increase significantly from the initial Program rate. Importantly, the PSC in its Order recognized that future rates may even decline as the required administrative and resource reserve funds are established. Page 24 of the PSC order states: While future Program rates may diverge from those under RMP’s proposal contingent on later determinations regarding Resource Valuation and changes to other underlying variables, no evidence in the record suggests that Program rates are likely to meaningfully increase from the initial rates approved in this order. Instead, under RMP’s proposal, they would decrease rather significantly after the first two years. At the Program’s inception, customers will be deciding whether to opt-out with reference to rates that are likely to be higher than rates charged later, after the reserve balances are sufficiently established. While this is not guaranteed and will be influenced by multiple factors including additional future resource procurements, the PSC found it within the public interest to allow the Program to begin with an initial fixed rate of $4 per month. Customer Noticing and Estimated Timelines There are two distinct but important milestones when customers will hear about the Program, defined in the order and State law: 6 • “Program Implementation” happens when the first customer notices are mailed by RMP. • “Program Commencement” is when RMP initiates collection of Program rates. The following is the anticipated timeline for Program milestones: June 2, 2026 Deadline for Communities to Adopt the ordinance (Hard) June - Nov/Dec 2026 RMP upgrades customer service and billing systems (estimated) Nov/Dec 2026 “Program Implementation” – First customer notices (estimated) Nov/Dec 2026 Second customer notices – 15 days after first notices (estimated) Jan/Feb 2027 “Program Commencement” – Program revenue collection begins (estimated) May/June 2027 Free cancellation period ends, termination fees apply (estimated) 2028-2030 Resources begin to come online. Exact timing will depend on resource selection and the terms of its PPA (estimated) Once the ordinance deadline of June 2 passes and RMP concludes its customer service upgrades (i.e. the “Startup Activities”) which are estimated to take approximately five months, RMP customers in a participating community will receive their first official notices about the Program. The first noticing date is defined as the beginning of “Program Implementation.” All RMP customers in communities that adopt the ordinance will receive two notices that are separate from their bills. This includes at least one mailed notice. The second notice will be mailed or digital, depending on customer communication preferences (i.e. if the customer has signed up for online billing.) Large commercial customers on Schedules 8 or 9 that have an electric load of one megawatt or greater will instead receive a noticing meeting, which may be conducted in-person or via video conference. The Agency expects the first customer notices will be mailed in late 2026. As required in the Act and the Utility Agreement, any community that enacts the Program (by passing the ordinance) is responsible for reimbursing RMP for the cost of providing the two required notices to all RMP customers within the community’s boundaries. The Sustainability Department has budgeted accordingly for this expected expense of $156,000. After the first notices go out, there will be two billing cycles, or approximately 60 days, until the first URC clean energy line item appears on RMP customer bills. This period of initial program rate collection is defined as “Program Commencement.” The Agency is estimating that Program Commencement will occur in early 2027. Utah HB 238 from 2026 passed and is currently awaiting the Governor’s signature. This bill adds additional requirements for the customer notices that are not expected to add additional burden to the already planned noticing process. Customers Wishing to Opt Out of the Program Once the Program begins, all customers can always exit it at any time. However, there may be termination fees after a certain time period for certain customers. 7 After “Program Implementation” when the first notices are sent out, customers will have a six-month period during which they can exit the Program for free (this is known as the “Cancellation Period.”) After six months, there will be a $30 termination fee for residential customers. There will be approximately four months during the Cancellation Period when customers will be paying the regular Program rates, but will not incur a termination fee if they choose to exit the Program. Income-qualified customers enrolled in HELP are never subject to a termination fee. Commercial customers will pay a termination fee specific to their particular rate schedule after the Cancellation Period ends. Termination fees are outlined in Attachment B. In addition to the Cancellation Period, the Program includes other circumstances during which the termination fee will not apply, including customers moving out of a participating community, ceasing to be a customer of RMP, or seeking protection through bankruptcy proceedings. New customers moving into a participating community, or annexed into it, will receive their own notice and no-fee cancellation period of 60 days from their first notice about the Program. Additional URC Agency Processes and Resource Solicitation While communities consider adopting the Program ordinance, the URC Agency will be working on several related processes that need to conclude before the Program launches. These include helping RMP upgrade their billing system and set up new customer service support for the Program (these are described in the order as “Startup Activities”.) The funding to backstop these required Startup Activities is the subject of an item in Budget Amendment 5 of FY2026 and is further discussed below. The Agency is also in the middle of a resource solicitation process to determine the first new clean energy resource(s) that will serve the Program. This process has played out separately and ahead of the Program Application. On November 19, 2024, RMP filed an Application for Approval of Solicitation Process 10 with the PSC describing the proposed process to solicit bids from clean energy developers (Docket 24-035-5511). The PSC granted the application12, clearing the way for URC to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) on May 22, 2025 13. Fifteen bids were initially received by the July 10, 2025, RFP deadline, one of which was later withdrawn 14. These bids were evaluated and scored by URC technical consultants, and an “initial short list” of six projects was selected by URC for further evaluation by RMP. URC received the results of this analysis in December 2025 and used this information to create a “final 10 See https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/24docs/2403555/336616Application11-19-2024.pdf 11 Docket No. 24-035-55 on the PSC website: https://psc.utah.gov/2024/11/19/docket-no-24-035-55/ 12 See https://pscdocs.utah.gov/electric/24docs/2403555/3397642403555ogrmpaam5-13-2025.pdf 13 URC RFP website: https://www.urc2024rfp.com/ 14 URC blog post regarding responses to the RFP: https://www.utahrenewablecommunities.org/post/urc-closes- the-call-for-clean-energy-resources-the-response-was-outstanding 8 short list”. In February 2026, the URC board approved Resolution 2026-0215 selecting all four final short list projects for power purchase agreement (PPA) negotiations. PPA negotiations are currently underway and the process to execute an agreement with one or more projects will eventually coincide with the valuation process, described below, and preparations towards implementing the URC Program. Finally, the Agency is also working with RMP and state agencies to determine how those resources will be valued. A program resource valuation methodology was not determined by the PSC in the Order and will be considered in a future regulatory proceeding. This will be based, in part, upon determinations that RMP and the PSC will make in the utility’s long-range planning effort across its multi-state service territory. This process is called the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The IRP lays out the utility’s forecast load growth over a 20-year timeline and what resources it plans to utilize to serve electricity demand. The IRP process– which culminates in plans that are released every two years and less robust “updates” that are released in intervening, off-cycle years— influences how the utility values new renewable energy brought to the grid. Once the latest version of the IRP is finalized, it will allow the URC and RMP to settle on a valuation methodology for URC clean energy resources going forward, pending PSC approval. What this means for individual customers is not likely to be noticeable, but will mean that the rates will change to a small degree in the future (as do all rates). Program Ordinance Ordinance details There are more details included in the ordinance than may be typical of many Salt Lake City ordinances, including many one-time deadlines and dates that will quickly stale in the code. While a bit awkward, it was decided deliberately by the URC communities to spell out the full details of the Program in the ordinance to offer transparency and clarity in one central location, without requiring community members to track down additional information in the Act, Rules, and Order. While atypical, the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office did not identify any issues with this approach. The ordinance must do two key things: ● Enact the approved program by the eligible community adopting the ordinance; and, ● Make it clear that the PSC has the final say on how the program will work. There are three sections in the ordinance that cover the following: • Preamble: describes the history and context for development of the Program. • Program adoption: while short in length, this is the “action” of the ordinance - that the community’s governing body votes to adopt the Community Clean Energy Program. • Exhibit A describes key elements of the Program that will occur if Salt Lake City adopts the ordinance. This includes: • Establishing Salt Lake City’s participation in the approved Community Clean Energy Program. 15 URC Resolution 2026-02 Resolution of the Board Selecting Projects for Contract Negotiation: https://www.utah.gov/pmn/files/1387795.pdf 9 • Enabling all retail electricity customers in current and future boundaries of Salt Lake City to participate in the Program. This does not include rooftop solar customers on Schedule 135, the older net metering schedule, in accordance with the Act.16 Rooftop solar customers on Schedules 136 and 137 are eligible to participate. • Defining the Program’s “Implementation Date” as the date when RMP sends out its first notices to customers of their forthcoming enrollment in the Program and describing RMP’s noticing requirements. • Explaining that eligible customers will be enrolled in the Program if they decline to opt-out by the date used in the RMP notices. • Describing that any customer in a participating community who is not enrolled in the Program may opt-in at any time. • Imposing termination fees for customers who opt out after the cancellation period as well as situations when termination fees will not occur. • Describing the process and approvals needed for clean energy resource acquisition under the Program. • Acknowledging that the PSC determines the Program rate and can approve adjustments to the rates periodically. • Acknowledging that RMP is responsible for billing customers and notifying them of changes to the Program rate. Section 7 of Exhibit A sets forth Salt Lake City’s role and responsibilities. This includes: • Salt Lake City will continue to participate in future decisions regarding clean energy resource solicitation, acquisition, and other issues. • Salt Lake City’s obligation to enter into an agreement with RMP to effectuate the Program. This “Utility Agreement” was negotiated between RMP and the communities between 2022-23, with the core participation of Salt Lake City staff and attorneys. It was shared with the City Council in October 2023. It was signed by Council Member Dugan, serving as the URC Agency Board Chair, on August 22, 2024, and by Mayor Mendenhall for Salt Lake City on November 26, 2024. The Utility Agreement is consistent for all communities and RMP, as required by the Act. • Per the Utility Agreement, Salt Lake City will reimburse RMP for their costs to provide the two required notices to all eligible customers within our boundary. Funds were first appropriated for this in the Department’s FY24 budget, which has been carried forward as a base budget item each year into the Department’s proposed FY27 base budget. • Salt Lake City has already appropriated and paid additional funds (when we joined the Agency) which, in part, were used to reimburse the OCS and DPU for their costs of contracting third-party expertise to evaluate the Program. Why Create a New Clean Energy Option? Participating Communities, as defined under the Act, are served by RMP – i.e., they do not have their own municipal utilities – and their options for procuring clean energy resources are, therefore, limited. 16 54-17-905(5) states that "a residential customer that is participating in the net metering program under Title 54, Chapter 15, Net Metering of Electricity, may not be a participating customer under this part." 10 The Program offers homes and businesses in our community a new option for supporting clean energy. Furthermore, the Program creates a unique opportunity to drive investment in new clean energy at scale, since, collectively, URC represents about 25% of RMP's electricity sales in Utah 17, which in turn represents 80% of total electricity sales in the State. Benefits of the URC Program Utah is facing a worrisome energy shortage, as our energy supply is projected to decrease while demand continues to rise, according to Governor Cox’s Operation Gigawatt18. Thankfully, URC is part of the solution: the Program will add hundreds of megawatts of new clean energy to the grid in the 2020s, with the aim of adding even more in the next decade to support our communities’ clean energy goals and growing energy needs. By adding new clean energy to our electricity mix, URC is part of the solution by creating a more reliable energy supply for Utah. Health and Environment The electricity used to power our homes and businesses comes from a collection of power plants connected to our grid. This includes electricity generated by natural gas, coal, wind, solar, hydropower, and more. Throughout the day, power plants are dispatched to generate enough electricity to meet demand. Wind and solar power plants have no fuel costs, so they are often dispatched before coal and gas plants which do have fuel costs. When coal and natural gas plants generate electricity, greenhouse gases and air pollutants are emitted into the atmosphere as byproducts. Renewable electricity generation does not come with harmful fossil fuel emissions. By adding more renewable energy to the grid, the URC program may reduce how often fossil fuel plants need to run. This reduces pollution, improving our air quality, water quality, and climate on a local and regional scale. In particular, there are several natural gas plants along the Wasatch Front, owned by RMP or other entities. Due to our state’s increasing electricity demands, these pollution-emitting gas plants will likely need to run more often, which is a particular concern for the Gadsby power plant, given its age and location in the Fairpark neighborhood of Salt Lake City, as well as others that impact our airshed. Adding new, clean energy to the grid helps alleviate overall electricity demand which can result in less air pollution from local fossil fuel power plants. This benefits the neighborhoods immediately next to power plants and those living throughout our inversion-prone valley. Similarly, the Hunter and Huntington coal plants in central Utah are large fossil fuel plants that contribute to air pollution in other parts of the state and reduce visibility in our national parks. The URC program aims to bring more clean energy to reduce pollution throughout the state. The Program ultimately aims to bring online about 500 MW of clean energy over the coming years, based on current participating customer projections. This amount of clean energy, which would occur 17 This estimate is based on the 19 currently participating communities. It is possible that not all 19 communities enact the final program by passing the ordinance 18 Information on Operation Gigawatt: https://energy.utah.gov/homepage/about-us/operation-gigawatt/ 11 over several different resource procurements, would result in an estimated reduction of 1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide pollution annually, and 1,000 pounds of criteria pollution annually.19 Economic Growth The Program supports economic growth by bringing new energy development to areas of the state that are hotspots for solar, wind, or other clean energy development. (Note that Salt Lake County is not a prime location for utility-scale solar and wind.) New projects create construction and operational jobs; provide resources to public schools via the Trust Lands Administration if projects are sited on certain state land; support private landowners if sited privately; and add to local counties’ tax base. These benefits were captured in a recent study by The Western Way20. Supporting a healthy environment is also core to many economic drivers in Utah– whether that’s the local ski and snow sports industry, national park visitation in gateway communities, or the upcoming 2034 Olympic & Paralympic Games. In fact, the Program is a cornerstone of the sustainability goals of Utah’s bid to the International Olympic Committee.21 Program comparison Homes and businesses have a few different ways to access clean energy. The Program is distinct from existing clean energy offerings: • The Blue Sky program has been available for nearly 26 years and allows participants to voluntarily contribute at $1.95 per 100 kWh “block” or 1.95 cents per kWh. Blue Sky is an important program that supports grants to help organizations offset the cost of rooftop solar (Salt Lake City has benefitted from a Blue Sky grant which helped cover the cost of solar on the Sorenson Center). Blue Sky participants also fund the purchase of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) nationwide which, while helpful to the industry, do not significantly catalyze the growth of new utility-scale renewable energy. Blue Sky is also more expensive on a per kilowatt-hour basis than the initial residential Program rate of $4 per month per residential customer approved by the PSC (0.609 cents per kWh for the average residential consumption of 637 kWh per month, plus a 12 cent per month surcharge charged to participants to assist low-income customers). This is, in part, due to key differences between the programs, including Blue Sky’s ability to claim RECs, while URC is aiming to use its rate revenue to develop new clean energy to match participant demand. • The Subscriber Solar Program is also one that Salt Lake City Corporation participates in. It offers RMP customers shares in an existing 20 MW solar farm in Southern Utah. While allowing customers to directly purchase a share of clean energy is an important benefit compared with Blue Sky, Subscriber Solar has a capped participation opportunity and RMP has not indicated they plan to build more projects to make available to additional subscribers. 19 Source: EPA’s AVERT model. https://www.epa.gov/avert 20 The Economic Benefits of Utah’s Rural Renewable Energy Industry: https://www.thewesternway.org/ut-eco-devo 21 "SALT LAKE CITY—UTAH COMMITTEE FOR THE GAMES Future Host Questionnaire Response" https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Olympic-Games/Future-Host/SLC-UT-2034-Future-Host- Questionnaire-Response.pdf : Pages 24, 46, 57 12 • Customers can individually install rooftop solar on their homes or businesses. This is an important option to support renewable energy growth and energy security. However, it is expensive and only available to some types of customers with the funding and property types that allow for it. For these reasons, Salt Lake City and the other participating communities that are part of URC have worked diligently to develop the Community Clean Energy Program with RMP over the last several years. The Program offers participating communities the opportunity to drive renewable energy development at utility scale and offers their residents and businesses the choice to participate. If the ordinance is not adopted, that choice is removed for them. History of Salt Lake City’s support Salt Lake City joint resolution Number 33 of 2016, adopted November 1, 2016 (“2016 Resolution”) established two renewable energy goals – one for Salt Lake City’s government operations and another for the wider Salt Lake City community. For government operations, the 2016 resolution established a goal to achieve at least 50% municipal renewable energy by 2020. It also established 2032 as the year to achieve 100% renewable energy for both government operations and the community. The community goal was advanced to 2030 in Joint Resolution 23 of 2019, which established “a community goal of achieving an amount equivalent to 100% of the annual electric energy supply for participating customers from renewable energy resources by 2030.” By adopting this latter resolution, Salt Lake City qualified under the Act to join the URC and develop the Program in partnership with RMP. Subsequently, Salt Lake City made financial contributions totaling $385,966.47 in Fiscal Years 2022 and 2023 to the Agency’s budget, which were proportional to our community’s population and electricity load. The Rules require participating communities to pay for program development and implementation costs incurred by the utility and regulators to avoid shifting costs to non-participating customers. On August 3, 2023, the Salt Lake City Council adopted Resolution 22 of 2023 endorsing the City’s ongoing participation in the development of the Program, and following that, Mayor Mendenhall signed the Utility Agreement along with the other participating communities. RMP is expected to sign the Utility Agreement soon now that the PSC has issued the Order. Transmittals shared with Council In addition to actions taken above, we are sharing the most recent transmittals on this program over the last few years, as reference: • In October 2022, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council seeking feedback on the draft model ordinance and approaches to low-income assistance. • In October 2023, the Department submitted an informational transmittal to City Council providing a copy of the Utility Agreement. • In December 2024, the Department submitted an informational transmittal giving an update on Program milestones. • In October 2025, the Department provided a transmittal updating the City Council on the Program Application and Solicitation processes and expected next steps, should the PSC approve the Program. 13 Budgetary Updates The Agency will begin to receive Program rate revenue after RMP begins revenue collection, anticipated in early 2027 according to the timeline above and in Attachment C. To date, Program costs have been paid for from member communities contributions. URC has also been successful in receiving one grant and a financial donation to support its efforts over the last year. Because the Agency unexpectedly had to run its own resource solicitation process, it charged bid fees from developer applicants to pay for consultants to run the solicitation and other legal and technical costs. The Agency has remaining budget to fund expected activities through 2026, and URC support staff continues to seek philanthropic opportunities to continue funding URC work to bridge any gaps until revenue collection begins. If additional funds are requested of member communities, which the Sustainability Department cannot cover with existing budget for Salt Lake City’s share, the Sustainability Department will prepare a budget amendment. As noted in the transmittal sent to the City Council in December 2024 and in the section below, there is a separate outstanding issue of unexpected administrative “Startup Costs.” Sustainability has included a funding request in FY26 Budget Amendment 5 to backstop the cost of these activities. Once revenue collection begins, all other costs associated with administering the program and for program resources will be covered by participating RMP customers and there is no further community obligation. Startup Costs There are certain customer service activities, with associated costs, that need to occur in order for RMP to send out bills with the Program line item, thus allowing the Program to commence. These activities can be paid for by ratepayer revenues, but those cannot be collected before such activities occur. Accordingly, these activities are called “Startup Activities” and their associated costs, “Startup Costs”. The most significant Startup Cost is an upgrade to RMP’s information systems to automate statutory aspects of the Program, namely, to: • allow Program-eligible customers to opt-out one or more of their electric accounts; • generate ongoing opt-out notices for new Program-eligible customers; and • assess any applicable termination fees. Other costs include setting up a 1-800 number for customer support, customer service training, and other miscellaneous costs. The total Startup Cost estimate provided to the PSC as part of the Program approval docket was $820,169. Unfortunately, RMP did not initially identify these Startup Costs as an expense that the URC would need to cover. For that reason, the URC’s initial $700,000 budget—fully funded through contributions by its 19 member communities—was not designed to cover it. Additionally, the Rules adopted by the PSC say that costs related to operation of the Program should be recovered through the Program rate paid by participating customers – not the participating communities. Further, neither the Act nor Rules allow Program-related costs like this to be shifted to non-participating customers. If these Program-related costs are included in the established rate, RMP has expressed 14 concern that the liability for the Startup Costs could be shifted to all customers if a majority of URC customers opt out of the Program. This is an extremely low likelihood event, but RMP has required that URC’s member communities sign an agreement, in advance, to cover the Startup Costs if those costs have not been recovered through Program rates after an agreed timeframe. The nature and estimated amounts of the Startup Costs were discussed in the Program Approval docket, with cost estimates and challenges made before the PSC. Ultimately, the PSC, in approving the program, acknowledged that the Startup Costs could be paid for up-front by RMP, but would need to be reimbursed, either by ratepayer revenues, or a URC community, so as not to shift costs to other RMP customers. Recognizing that Salt Lake City is the community with the largest population and electricity load of all 19 URC communities and could thus most benefit from the Program’s impact, the Sustainability Department agreed to request budget allocation that could be obligated, allowing Salt Lake City to sign such a contract with Rocky Mountain Power. As confirmed in recent conversations with RMP staff, the Startup Costs will remain approximately the same whether solely Salt Lake City participates in the program, or all 19 communities. The Startup Cost estimate we are using for Budget Amendment 5 is the one RMP provided to the PSC of $820,169, plus an additional 10% contingency. While this number is an estimate and actual costs would vary, we believe it is on the higher end of what would be required, allowing us to move forward contractually. Furthermore, it is very unlikely that Salt Lake City would end up needing to pay this money to RMP. Rather, it is being identified and held as a backstop in order to sign the Startup Cost agreement. That is because it is estimated the Program could generate around $18 million in revenues each year at the PSC-approved initial rate of $4 per month for residential customers and $0.00609 per kWh for non- residential customers. At these rates, it is likely that the Startup Cost estimate of $820,169 will be more than recovered from a single month of Program revenue. Given RMP’s requirement that a contract be in place and the high likelihood that the full cost will be recovered through one month of Program revenues, it is very likely that this Startup Cost budget can be de-obligated shortly after Program revenue collection begins. These details have been worked into the contractual language that is currently being negotiated with RMP. Salt Lake City is separately talking with other communities that are part of the Agency on their potential contributions to reimburse the City, in the case that the Startup Costs are collected. Conclusion After nearly a decade of thoughtful, intentional, and complex work to plan, design, negotiate, and apply for approval, the Community Clean Energy Program has been approved by the PSC. This milestone starts a 90-day clock for each of the 19 communities involved in URC to consider enacting the approved Program by adopting the program ordinance by June 2, 2026. If adopted, the first customer notices are 15 expected to go out in late 2026, and the new clean energy line item will appear in early 2027 on customers’ RMP bills. This page has intentionally been left blank ATTACHMENT A This page has intentionally been left blank ATTACHMENT B Information on termination fees included in the Program Application This page has intentionally been left blank Estimated 2026-27 URC Timeline PROGRAM: v PSC program approval: (March 4, 2026) 1 v Ordinance adoption (within 90 days of PSC approval: ends June 2,2026) 2 v RMP preps billing system (5 months following adoption window) 3 Noticing period (60 days following implementation) 4 No fee opt-out period (~ 4 months following commencement) 5 Fee-Free Cancellation Period of 6 months "Implementation Date" Noticing begins (~November 2, 2026) "Commencement Date" Revenue collection begins (~January 1, 2027) “Implementation” = when customer noticing begins. Currently estimated in late 2026 “Commencement” = when rate collection begins. Currently estimated in early 2027 This page has intentionally been left blank Item H1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY tinyurl.com/AnnualHUDGrants TO:City Council Members FROM:Allison Rowland, Senior Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR FEDERAL HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS AND CITY FUNDING OUR FUTURE HOUSING PROGRAMS MOTION 1 – ADOPT ANNUAL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS I move that the Council approve a resolution adopting the funding allocations attached to the motion sheet as Exhibit A. These include, for the One-Year Annual Action Plan, the 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA grant funding, as well as funding distributions for 2025-2026 Funding Our Future funding. I further move that in the next budget amendment, First Step House be allocated $255,000 for Funding Our Future item 21, Housing Case Management, from Funding Our Future fund balance. Staff note (do not read aloud): This year, HUD announced the City’s final CDBG, ESG, HOME, and HOPWA funding amounts just before the Council made its final decisions. The contingencies for how individual grant awards to applicants were adjusted are included at the end of Exhibit A. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council proceed to the next agenda item. SALT LAKE CITY 2026-2027 HUD & 2025-2026 FOF FINAL Simplified Funding Log COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD TOTAL $3,250,831.00 ACTUAL GRANT AWARD TOTAL $3,213,874.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME $950,000.00 ACTUAL PROGRAM INCOME $950,000 REALLOCATED FUNDING $917,447.00 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE 100% TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ESTIMATE)$5,118,278.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ACTUAL)$5,081,321.00 FUNDING CATEGORIES CATEGORY NAME ALLOCATION CAP ($); OR (%)AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT AWARDED (CONTINGENCY)TOTAL APPLICANTS Neighborhoods, Housing and Infrastructure n/a n/a $4,702,500 $3,813,696.00 10 Public Services $630,124.65 15%$2,461,340 $624,850.00 27 Administration $650,166.20 20%$650,166.20 $642,775.00 1 TOTAL $7,814,005.83 $5,081,321.00 38 COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS If funding is GREATER than estimated: Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award and estimated CDBG Program Income to Public Services. Add additional funding to the highest-scoring applications up to and in excess of the full ask before moving to the next highest-scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000. If funding is LESS than estimated: Allocate 20% of the annual CDBG award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award and estimated CDBG Program Income to Public Services. Remove funding from the lowest-scoring activities down to the minimum amount required to run the program, moving up from the lowest-scoring, funded activity. If you reach the top of the programs and funding still needs to be decreased, remove the lowest scoring, funded activity, and reallocate the funding to the highest scoring activity up to the board's recommended amounts, moving down the list. Round to the nearest 1,000 or 10,000. APPLICATIONS #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR City Administration 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Staff Housing Stability Division / Finance / Attorney's Office n/a $650,166.20 $650,166.20 $650,166.00 $642,775.00 $642,775.00 TOTAL $650,166.20 $650,166.20 $650,166.00 $642,775.00 $642,775.00 Neighborhoods, Housing and Infrastructure 2 YWCA Utah Transitional Housing Conversion 79%$215,000.00 $215,000.00 $215,000.00 $215,000.00 $215,000.00 3 NIS Team Neighborhood Business Improvement Program (NBIP)74%$720,000.00 $720,000.00 $720,000.00 $720,000.00 $720,000.00 4 Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Repair Program 74%$400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 5 Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (DBA NeighborWorks)Homeownership Promotion Services 71%$402,500.00 $402,500.00 $402,500.00 $402,500.00 $402,500.00 6 Odyssey House Adolescent Residential Facility Upgrades 71%$315,000.00 $315,000.00 $315,000.00 $315,000.00 $315,000.00 7 Assist, Inc.Emergency Home Repair, Accessibility, and Community Design 71%$900,000.00 $900,000.00 $900,000.00 $900,000.00 $900,000.00 8 First Step House Building Improvements 71%$300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 9 NIS Team Fix the Bricks 68%$460,000.00 $460,000.00 $460,000.00 $460,000.00 $460,000.00 10 Community Development Corporation of Utah Homebuyer Education and DPA 63%$750,000.00 $125,488.00 $125,488.00 $101,196.00 $101,196.00 11 Upwards Care, Inc.Boost Program 58%$240,000.00 $-$-$-$- TOTAL $4,702,500.00 $3,837,988.00 $3,837,988.00 $3,813,696 $3,813,696 Public Services 12 Salt Lake Donated Dental Services Community Dental Project 84%$60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 13 YWCA Utah Housing and Stability Access 79%$80,500.00 $80,500.00 $80,500.00 $80,500.00 $80,500.00 14 Wasatch Homeless Health Care, Inc. (DBA Fourth Street Clinic)Health and Housing Transition Team (HHoT)79%$207,412.00 $207,412.00 $157,412.00 $167,412 $167,412.00 15 The Road Home Housing Staffing 79%$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 16 THRIVE Center for Survivors of Torture Integrated Services for Torture Survivors 79%$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 17 South Valley Services Case Management 76%$60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $-$- 18 Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah Site-Based Mentoring 76%$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 19 The Road Home Gail Miller Resource Center (GMRC)76%$100,000.00 $72,212.00 $72,212.00 $66,938.00 $66,938.00 20 Fit to Recover Free Meals, Scholarships, & Recovery Resources for Unhoused Adults and At-risk Youth 74%$50,000.00 $-$50,000.00 $50,000 $50,000.00 21 First Step House Housing Case Management 74%$72,486.00 $-$-$-$- 22 International Rescue Committee ESL & Financial Readiness 74%$60,000.00 $-$-$-$- 23 Catholic Community Services Housing Locator 74%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- 24 Catholic Community Services Employment & Client Specialist 74%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- 25 Disability Law Center Jobs for All 71%$55,000.00 $-$-$-$- 26 Utah Community Action Early Childhood Services 71%$240,000.00 $-$-$-$- 27 Wasatch Community Gardens Green Team 71%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- 28 English Skills Learning Center Workplace English and Career Pathways for Limited English Speakers 71%$60,321.58 $-$-$-$- 29 Odyssey House Bus Passes 71%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- 30 Women of the World Self-Sufficiency Services 68%$150,000.00 $-$-$-$- 31 Asian Association of Utah Stability, Opportunity, Assistance, & Resilience for Survivors of Trafficking (SOAR)68%$215,842.84 $-$-$-$- 32 A Tall Order HomeInn Rio Grande Reentry Services Program 68%$75,000.00 $-$-$-$- 33 Salt Lake American Refugee Services for Survival 68%$30,000.00 $-$-$50,000 $50,000 34 Spy Hop Productions Advanced Apprenticeship 66%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- 35 Asian Association of Utah Refugee Rental Assistance & Housing Stability 66%$219,777.21 $-$-$-$- 36 A Tall Order HomeInn Rio Grande Employment Initiative Program 66%$75,000.00 $-$-$-$- 37 Odyssey House Transitional Housing 63%$150,000.00 $-$-$-$- 38 Advantage Services Homeless Employment Program 63%$100,000.00 $-$-$-$- TOTAL $2,461,339.63 $630,124.00 $630,124.00 $624,850.00 $624,850.00 GRAND TOTAL $7,814,005.83 $5,118,278.20 $5,118,278.00 $5,081,321.00 $5,081,321.00 EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT (ESG) ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD TOTAL $293,174.00 ACTUAL GRANT AWARD TOTAL $285,714 ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME $0.00 ACTUAL PROGRAM INCOME $0 REALLOCATED FUNDING $5,890.00 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE 100% TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ESTIMATE)$299,064.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ACTUAL)$291,604 FUNDING CATEGORIES CATEGORY NAME ALLOCATION CAP ($); OR (%)AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT AWARDED (CONTINGENCY)TOTAL APPLICANTS ESG Part 1 $179,438.40 60%$299,398.00 $167,076 5 ESG Part 2 n/a n/a $458,756.00 $103,099 4 Administration $21,988.00 7.5%$21,988.00 $21,429 1 TOTAL $780,142.00 $291,604 10 COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS If funding is GREATER than estimated: Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program administration. Do not exceed the 60% Part 1 funding cap. Add additional funding to the highest-scoring applications up to or in excess of the full ask before moving to the next highest-scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000. If funding is LESS than estimated: Allocate 7.5% of the annual ESG award to program administration. Remove funding from the lowest-scoring activities down to the minimum amount required to run the program, moving up from the lowest-scoring, funded activity. If you reach the top of the programs and funding still needs to be decreased, remove the lowest scoring, funded activity, and reallocate the funding to the highest scoring activity up to the board's recommended amounts, moving down the list. Round to the nearest $1,000. APPLICATIONS #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE*REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR City Administration 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Staff Housing Stability Division / Finance / Attorney's Office n/a $21,988.00 $21,988.00 $21,988.00 $21,429.00 $21,429.00 TOTAL $21,988.00 $21,988.00 $21,988.00 $21,429.00 $21,429.00 #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE*REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR ESG Part 1 2 Volunteers of America Youth Resource Center 82%$62,200.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 3 First Step House Resource Center Program 79%$60,000.00 $57,076.00 $57,076.00 $57,076.00 $57,076.00 4 Volunteers of America Geraldine E. King Women's Resource Center 79%$74,750.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 5 Ruff Haven Ruff Haven Street Outreach 66%$52,448.00 $-$-$30,000 $- 6 Family Promise Family Promise Direct Family Services 63%$50,000.00 $-$-$-$- TOTAL $299,398.00 $167,076.00 $167,076.00 $167,076.00 $167,076.00 ESG Part 2 7 YWCA of Utah YWCA Utah: Housing Stability Through Survivor- Centered Case Management 79%$80,500.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $53,099.00 $53,099.00 8 Utah Community Action UCA FY26 SLC ESG 74%$158,256.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 9 The Road Home TRH - ESG RRH - FY27 (Rapid Re-housing)74%$100,000.00 $-$-$-$- 10 Asian Association Refugee and Immigrant Homeless Prevention & Rapid Re-Housing Program 71%$120,000.00 $-$-$-$- TOTAL $458,756.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $103,099 $103,099.00 GRAND TOTAL $780,142.00 $299,064.00 $299,064.00 $291,604 $291,604.00 HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD TOTAL $817,318.00 ACTUAL GRANT AWARD TOTAL $832,192.89 ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME $800,000.00 ACTUAL PROGRAM INCOME $800,000.00 REALLOCATED FUNDING $574,508.00 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE 100% REALLOACTED CHDO $351,086.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ESTIMATE)$2,542,912.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ACTUAL)$2,557,786.89 FUNDING CATEGORIES CATEGORY NAME ALLOCATION CAP ($); OR (%)AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT AWARDED (CONTINGENCY)TOTAL APPLICANTS HOME Projects $1,930,046 n/a $2,022,324.00 $1,941,202 7 HOME CHDO $473,680.00 15% + Reallocated CHDO $475,000.00 $475,914.00 1 Administration $139,182.60 10%$139,182.65 $140,670.09 1 TOTAL $2,636,506.65 $2,557,786 9 COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS If funding is GREATER than estimated: Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award for the CHDO Set-Aside. Add additional funding to the highest-scoring applications up to or in excess of the full ask before moving to the next highest-scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000. If funding is LESS than estimated: Allocate 10% of the annual HOME award to program administration. Allocate 15% of the annual award and 15% of the estimated 2024- 25 CDBG Program Income to Public Services. Remove funding from the lowest-scoring activities down to the minimum amount required to run the program, moving up from the lowest-scoring, funded activity. If you reach the top of the programs and funding still needs to be decreased, remove the lowest scoring, funded activity, and reallocate the funding to the highest scoring activity up to the board's recommended amounts, moving down the list. Round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000. APPLICATIONS #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR City Administration 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Staff Housing Stability Division / Finance / Attorney's Office n/a $139,182.65 $139,182.00 $139,182.00 $140,670.00 $140,670.00 TOTAL $139,182.65 $139,182.00 $139,182.00 $140,670.00 $140,670.00 HOME Projects 2 The Road Home TRH - HOME - Tenant-Based Rental Assistance - FY27 82%$350,000.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 3 Volunteers of America Youth Resource Center’s Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Program 82%$176,194.00 $176,194.00 $176,194.00 $176,194.00 $176,194.00 4 Community Development Corp of Utah Emeril Avenue Apartments 76%$200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 5 Community Development Corp of Utah Community Development Land Trust (CDLT)74%$400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 6 First Step House TBRA 74%$326,055.00 $326,055.00 $326,055.00 $326,055.00 $326,055.00 7 Utah Community Action UCA FY26 SLC TBRA 71%$294,075.00 $294,075.00 $294,075.00 $294,075.00 $294,075.00 8 Neighborworks Homeownership Promotion Services 63%$276,000.00 $183,722.00 $183,722.00 $194,878.00 $194,878.00 TOTAL $2,022,324.00 $1,930,046.00 $1,930,046.00 $1,941,202.00 $1,941,202.00 CHDO Projects 9 Community Development Corp of Utah CHDO Capacity Building and Emeril Ave New Construction 63%$475,000.00 $473,684.00 $473,684.00 $475,914.00 $475,914.00 TOTAL $475,000.00 $473,684.00 $473,684.00 $475,914.00 $475,914.00 GRAND TOTAL $2,636,506.65 $2,542,912.00 $2,542,912.00 $2,557,786.00 $2,557,786.00 HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONS WITH AIDS (HOPWA) ESTIMATED GRANT AWARD TOTAL $972,032.00 ACTUAL GRANT AWARD TOTAL $1,043,109.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME $0 ACTUAL PROGRAM INCOME $0 REALLOCATED FUNDING $0 MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE 100% TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ESTIMATE)$972,032.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ACTUAL)$1,043,109.00 FUNDING CATEGORIES CATEGORY NAME ALLOCATION CAP ($); OR (%)AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT AWARDED (CONTINGENCY)TOTAL APPLICANTS HOPWA Projects n/a n/a $996,318 $1,011,815 2 City Administration $29,160.96 3%$29,160.96 $31,293 1 TOTAL $1,025,478.96 $1,043,108 3 COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS If funding is GREATER than estimated:Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program administration. Add additional funding to the highest-scoring applications up to the full ask before moving to the next highest-scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000. If funding is LESS than estimated: Allocate 3% of the annual HOPWA award to program administration. Remove funding from the lowest-scoring activities down to the minimum amount required to run the program, moving up from the lowest-scoring, funded activity. If you reach the top of the programs and funding still needs to be decreased, remove the lowest scoring, funded activity, and reallocate the funding to the highest scoring activity up to the board's recommended amounts, moving down the list. Round to the nearest $1,000 or $10,000. APPLICATIONS #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR City Administration 1 Salt Lake City Corporation Staff Housing Stability Division / Finance / Attorney's Office n/a $29,160.96 $29,160.00 $29,160.00 $31,293.00 $31,293.00 TOTAL $29,160.96 $29,160.00 $29,160.00 $31,293.00 $31,293.00 HOPWA Projects 2 Housing Connect Salt Lake City HOPWA – Housing Connect 79%$737,508.00 $737,508.00 $737,508.00 $753,005.00 $753,005.00 3 Utah Community UCA FY26 SLC HOPWA 74%$258,810.00 $205,363.00 $205,363.00 $258,810.00 $258,810.00 TOTAL $996,318.00 $942,871.00 $942,871.00 $1,011,815.00 $1,011,815.00 GRAND TOTAL $1,025,478.96 $972,031.00 $972,031.00 $1,043,108.00 $1,043,108.00 FUNDING OUR FUTURE HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES (FOF 2025-2026) APPROPRIATED FUNDING TOTAL $2,370,500.00 APPROPRIATED FUNDING TOTAL $2,370,500.00 ESTIMATED PROGRAM INCOME n/a ACTUAL PROGRAM INCOME n/a REALLOCATED FUNDING n/a MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SCORE 100% TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE $2,370,500.00 TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE (ACTUAL)$2,370,500.00 FUNDING CATEGORIES CATEGORY NAME ALLOCATION CAP ($); OR (%)AMOUNT REQUESTED AMOUNT AWARDED (CONTINGENCY)TOTAL APPLICANTS Equity and Home Ownership Assistance $350,000.00 n/a $562,500.00 $350,000.00 3 Tenant-based Housing Assistance $2,020,500.00 n/a $4,636,397.45 $2,020,500.00 20 TOTAL $5,198,897.45 $2,370,500 23 COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS COMMITTEE CONTINGENCY PLANS If available funding is INCREASED:Add additional funding to the highest-scoring applications up to the full ask before moving to the next highest-scoring application. As much as practicable, round to the nearest $100 or $1,000. APPLICATIONS #APPLICANT PROJECT/PROGRAM SCORE REQUEST RECOMMENDATIONS COUNCIL FUNDING ALLOCATIONS CONTINGENCY FUNDING ALLOCATIONSCDCIP BOARD MAYOR Equity and Home Ownership Assistance 1 Community Development Corporation of Utah Homebuyer Cohort & Matched Savings 69%$100,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 2 Community Development Corporation of Utah Down Payment Assistance 67%$200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 3 SL Neighborhood Housing (NeighborWorks Down Payment Assistance & Home Improvements 62%$262,500.00 $-$-$- TOTAL $562,500.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 Tenant-based Housing Assistance 4 The INN Between Medical Supportive Housing for the Homeless 90%$185,000.00 $165,700.00 $165,700.00 $165,700.00 5 Utah Community Action Landlord Tenant Mediation 79%$449,408.00 $355,200.00 $355,200.00 $325,200.00 *ESG Ruff Haven**Ruff Haven Street Outreach n/a $52,448.00 $-$-$30,000.00 ** Council allocation of $30,000 from FOF #5 Utah Community Action to #5 Ruff Haven, ESG Pt 1. 6 The Road Home Shared Housing 79%$171,811.00 $135,800.00 $135,800.00 $135,800.00 7 The Road Home Supportive Housing Case Management 78%$269,100.00 $210,200.00 $210,200.00 $210,200.00 8 Odyssey House Transitional Housing 78%$198,079.00 $154,700.00 $154,700.00 $154,700.00 9 The Road Home House 20 77%$200,626.00 $154,800.00 $154,800.00 $154,800.00 10 International Rescue Committee New American Rental Assistance 76%$150,000.00 $114,300.00 $114,300.00 $114,300.00 11 Family Support Center Child & Family Support at LifeStart Village 76%$100,000.00 $76,200.00 $76,200.00 $76,200.00 12 South Valley Services Wraparound Case Management 76%$280,000.00 $213,400.00 $213,400.00 $213,400.00 13 Wasatch Community Gardens Green Team Case Management 76%$69,000.00 $52,600.00 $52,600.00 $52,600.00 14 Community Development Corporation of Utah Community Navigation & Rental Assistance 75%$250,000.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 15 Asian Association of Utah Rental Assistance for Human Trafficking Survivors 75%$229,032.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 16 Volunteers of America House 20 75%$248,029.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 17 Asian Association of Utah Rental Assistance for Vulnerable Refugee and Immigrant Populations 75%$239,253.45 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 $96,900.00 18 Women of the World Assistance for Refugee, Immigrant, and Asylum-Seeking Women 74%$150,000.00 $-$-$- 19 YWCA Utah Residential Self-Sufficiency Pilot, Survivor Driven Housing, and KRH Incentivized Rent Assistance 73%$347,300.00 $-$-$- 20 Catholic Community Services of Utah Refugee Resettlement Assistance 73%$185,000.00 $-$-$- *21 First Step House Housing Case Management 71%$679,513.00 $-$-$- 22 The Road Home Landlord Assurance 70%$185,246.00 $-$-$- 23 Utah Housing Coalition Renter, Tenant, and Landlord Education 69%$50,000.00 $-$-$- TOTAL $4,636,397.45 $2,020,500.00 $2,020,500.00 $2,020,500.00 GRAND TOTAL $5,198,897.45 $2,370,500.00 $2,370,500.00 $2,370,500.00 Item H2 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel Public Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: ORDINANCE: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AT 1073 SOUTH NAVAJO STREET (PLNPCM2025-01015) MOTION 1 – ADOPT ORDINANCE I move that the Council adopt the ordinance. MOTION 2 – REJECT I move that the Council reject the ordinance. MOTION 3 – DEFER ACTION I move the Council postpone action to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: ORDINANCE: ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AT 1073 SOUTH NAVAJO STREET (PLNPCM2025-01015) NEW INFORMATION ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE Planning staff recommended approval, and the Commission voted 6-1 to forward a positive recommendation for the proposed zoning map amendment to the City Council. Details from the Planning Commission’s January 14, 2026 meeting are provided below. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendment and determine if the Council supports moving forward. The Council will then hold a public hearing and consider adopting the zoning map amendment at future meetings. POLICY QUESTIONS Item Schedule: Page | 2 1. The Council may wish to ask the applicant if they anticipate providing off-street parking for the planned new units they intend to construct. 2. The applicant states the additional units will be for-sale, family-sized homes. If the Council is interested in ensuring those units are owner-occupied, they may wish to ask the administration how the city can ensure they will not become rentals. 3. The Council may wish to ask if the administration has discussed with the applicant using the Affordable Housing Incentives ordinance to provide some affordable housing at this location. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The current R-1/5,000 zone allows one single-family dwelling per 5,000 square feet of lot area and 50 feet of lot width, so the 21,000-square-foot property could accommodate up to four single-family homes. However, site constraints and zoning standards make infill development difficult. The RMF-30 district allows greater flexibility in development style and housing types, including row homes, multiple single- family dwellings, small-scale multi-family housing, and lots without direct public street frontage. As shown in the image on the right, the subject property is adjacent to R-1/5,000 zoning to the north, east, and south, with R- 1/7,000 across the street to the west. Salt Lake City Code Chapter 21A.50.050 states that a proposed zoning amendment must satisfy the consideration factors, including compliance with citywide policies, goals, and adopted plans, as well as demonstrating a community benefit that would not be achievable without the amendment.Area zoning map with subject parcel outlined in blue. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division In this case, an identified option for community benefit includes providing housing that meets current or future community needs as identified by the general plan. The applicant proposes to maintain the existing single- family home and build additional family-sized units that are smaller in size and scale, and compatible with the existing neighborhood, in line with the Westside Master Plan. Each new unit would be on its own lot intended for ownership. If the Council adopts the zoning map amendment, there is no guarantee the proposed development will be constructed. The property could be redeveloped with any use allowed within the zone or sold to another party. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. Because zoning can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. Page | 3 SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its January 14, 2026, meeting and held a public hearing, during which three people spoke. Two commenters expressed a desire that the neighborhood’s existing character and scale be retained. Concerns were raised about the potential increased density and its impact on traffic, especially given the property’s proximity to a school and children walking nearby. A third commenter questioned the type of housing proposed and whether the units would be owner-occupied or could be sold and rented out. The applicant husband and wife spoke in support of the project, emphasizing their intention to build attainable, for-sale housing. They noted that home ownership is increasingly difficult because of rising prices and believe this street is well-suited for additional density and is near a bus line. The applicants stated the city needs higher- density, for-sale housing and that this project helps provide it. The Commissioner who voted against the proposal questioned the appropriateness of rezoning a single parcel in an otherwise fairly uniform neighborhood, especially given the property’s location near the middle of the block, and expressed a preference for neighborhood densification when it transitions from the edges of a block. The commissioner also expressed difficulty in evaluating the zoning map amendment without a detailed development proposal. Some Commissioners agreed with these points but ultimately voted to forward a positive recommendation. The proposed ordinance included in the administrative transmittal requires the petitioner to enter into a development agreement with Salt Lake City that includes the following conditions: a. The existing primary home on the site be retained. b. Any additional dwelling units over four units must be for-sale. In its staff report to the Planning Commission, Planning staff identified four key considerations, summarized below. The complete analysis is on pages 3-7 of the report, linked in the ATTACHMENTS section below. Planning staff found the proposed amendment generally aligns with the goals identified in adopted plans listed below. Page | 4 Plan Salt Lake (2015): The proposal aligns with the citywide plan, which encourages infill development in areas with existing infrastructure and services. The Plan also supports increased moderate density within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. Planning staff finds the 20,000 sq. ft. lot underutilized because it currently has only one single-family home. The proposed RMF-30 district would allow the petitioner to increase medium-density housing. Housing SLC (2013): The proposed rezone aligns with Housing SLC’s objectives to increase homeownership opportunities, family-sized units, and missing middle housing to address housing needs citywide. Westside Plan (2014): The proposal aligns with the Westside Plan, which supports compatible infill density and encourages incremental density, including “allowing two- or multi-family development on lots that are zoned for only single-family where appropriate. Appropriate cases include lots that have unique shapes or where the impact on adjacent properties would be negligible due to the unique properties of the parcels.” Neighborhood Nodes identified by the Westside Plan – Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division The property is within one-third of a mile of a Neighborhood Node along Indiana Avenue and one-quarter mile of a Neighborhood Node on Glendale Drive. Increased housing at the property would be serviced by these nodes. Consideration 2 – Neighborhood Context Single-family homes make up a significant portion of the Glendale neighborhood, where the subject property is located. The neighborhood also contains several duplexes, triplexes, and small multi-family buildings, many built before current zoning standards, reflecting a historic pattern of incremental density. Planning staff finds the subject property's large lot size and proximity to bus routes, schools, neighborhood commercial corridors, and Jordan Park make it well-suited for residential infill. The flexibility of RMF-30 zoning would allow additional homes to be built in a manner consistent with the neighborhood's existing scale and character, without requiring an additional Planned Development review. Consideration 3 – Development Potential Comparison R-1-,5000 vs RMF-30 Under the existing R-1/5,000 zoning, the site could realistically accommodate two single-family lots with a flag lot configuration. The Affordable Housing Incentives option could allow up to four units with affordability restrictions. Under the proposed RMF-30 zoning, the site could accommodate up to 14 units, depending on the housing type. The proposed zone would permit single-family homes, two-family dwellings, multifamily buildings, row houses, cottages, and tiny houses. Given the lot’s shape and the applicant’s intention to retain the existing home, the site is likely to accommodate five to eight additional housing units. Any development would be subject to all applicable setback, height, design, and parking requirements. Consideration 4 – Proposed Community Benefit The applicant's identified community benefit is “Providing housing that aligns with the current or future needs of the community as determined by the general plan. Needs could include the level of affordability in excess of the number of dwellings that exist on the site, size in terms of number of bedrooms, or availability of housing for purchase,” per Salt Lake City Code 21A.50.50.C. Page | 5 About 70 percent of housing in Glendale is renter-occupied, compared to about 52 percent citywide. Homeownership rates in Glendale are lower than in nearby neighborhoods such as Poplar Grove and Rose Park. The neighborhood also has a higher proportion of mid- to high-rise apartment buildings than other missing middle housing types. The proposed rezone would allow housing types that are underrepresented in Glendale and expand homeownership opportunities. CURRENT AND PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON The purpose of the existing R-1/5,000 zoning district is to accommodate single-family residential development on lots of at least 5,000 square feet, with limited allowance for up to four units under affordable housing incentives. The district is intended to preserve neighborhood character, compatible with existing scale and intensity, and provide safe, sustainable living environments. ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS Zoning Map Amendment Factor Finding Complies Complies Complies N/A Complies; though the applicant will be required to provide waste- removal facilities with Page | 6 any development application. The status of existing transportation facilities, any planned changes to the transportation facilities, and the impact that the proposed amendment may have on the city’ s ability, need, and timing of future transportation improvements. Complies The proximity of necessary amenities such as parks, open space, schools, fresh food, entertainment, cultural facilities, and the ability of current and future residents to access these amenities without having to rely on a personal vehicle. Complies The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. Complies The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Complies; the applicant does not intend to demolish the existing single-family home The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement Complies; no existing businesses on property The community benefits that would result from the proposed map amendment.Complies CITY DEPARTMENT AND DIVISION REVIEW The proposal was reviewed by several Salt Lake City Departments and Divisions; none of which opposed the proposed rezone. The following departments and divisions responded to this proposal: Fire Department, Police Department, Department of Public Utilities, Department of Sustainability, Engineering Division (Department of Community & Neighborhoods), Urban Forestry Division (Department of Public Lands). PROJECT CHRONOLOGY October 9, 2025 – Application for a Zoning Map Amendment reviewed for pre-screen. November 4, 2025 – Application for a Zoning Map Amendment was accepted. November 11, 2025 – Petition PLNPCM2025- 01015 for a zoning map amendment was assigned to Olivia Cvetko, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. October 1, 2025 – Notice was sent to the Glendale Community Council Recognized Community Organization (RCO) informing them of the petition. Early notification of the project was also sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal. The proposal was posted for an online open house. The proposal can still be viewed online. An Early Notification sign was posted on the properties by the applicant. January 1, 2026 – The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. Planning Staff posted notices on City and State websites and sent notices via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notices were mailed. Page | 7 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Page | 7 January 8, 2026 – Planning Commission Staff Report was posted. January 14, 2026 – Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed map amendment. January 16, 2026 – Requested Final Draft of Ordinance from Attorney’s Office. February 2, 2026 – Final Draft of Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office. February 24, 2026 – Transmittal received in City Council Office ATTACHMENTS A.Planning Commission Staff Report B.Stream January 14, 2026 Planning Commission Briefing SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 02/04/2026 Date Sent to Council: 02/24/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Cvetko, Olivia E-mail Olivia.Cvetko2@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 02/06/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 02/24/2026 Subject: Zoning Amendment at 1073 S Navajo Street Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance as recommended by staff Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The applicant and owner, Mark Overdevest, is requesting approval from the City to amend the zoning map for the property located at 1073 S Navajo Street from the R-1/5,000 (Single-Family Residential) District to the RMF-30 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) District. If approved, the applicant intends to retain the existing single-family home and construct additional future for-sale homes on the lot which is roughly 0.49 acres (21,000 sq. ft.) in size. Under the requested RMF-30 (Low-Density Multi-Family) zoning, the property would allow greater flexibility in unit type and configuration. The district permits single-family homes, two-family dwellings, multifamily buildings, and row houses, generally requiring 2,000 square feet of lot area per unit. The property could accommodate 10-14 units depending on building form based on minimum lot size requirements; however, retention of the existing home along with setbacks, open space, and parking requirements will likely reduce the number of dwelling units the site can accommodate. Council Considerations The proposed amendments should meet the consideration factors outlined in Chapter 21A.50.050 of the Salt Lake City Code. Included in these factors are compliance with citywide policies, goals, and adopted plans; and to identify a community benefit that would not otherwise be provided without the amendment. One of the identified options for a community benefit includes “Providing housing that aligns with the current or future needs of the community as determined by the general plan. Needs could include the level of affordability in excess of the number of dwellings that exist on the site, size in terms of number of bedrooms, or availability of housing for purchase”. The property owners have proposed to maintain the existing single-family home and build additional family-sized housing units similar in size, scale, and compatibility to the existing neighborhood in accordance with the Westside Master Plan. In addition, each home would be on its own lot allowing for the opportunity for ownership opportunities. This item was reviewed by the Planning Commission in a public hearing on January 14th, 2026. The Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation of the Zoning Map Amendment to the City Council in a six to one vote. Details regarding the community benefit requirements will need to be finalized as part of the development agreement but were deemed sufficient. PUBLIC PROCESS: The following is a list of public meetings that have been held, and other public input opportunities, related to the proposed project since the applications were submitted: •November 17, 2025 Early Engagement Outreach o The Glendale Community Council was sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. The council did not provide comments. o Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the development were provided early notification of the proposal. o The project was posted to the Online Open House webpage. •January 1, 2026 Notice of the Planning Commission Public Hearing o Public hearing notice sign posted on the property o Public hearing notice mailed o Public notice posted on City and State websites and Planning Division list serve •January 14, 2026 Planning Commission Public Hearing o The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. The Planning Commission voted six to one to forward a recommendation of approval for the request, with the following conditions of approval: 1.The following provisions be incorporated into a development agreement for the zoning map amendment: 1.The existing primary home on the site be retained. 2.Any additional dwelling units over four units must be for-sale. Planning Commission (PC) Records a)PC Agenda of January 14, 2026 (Click to Access) b)PC Minutes of January 14, 2026 (Click to Access) c)Planning Commission Staff Report of January 14, 2026 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1.Ordinance 2.Project Chronology 3.Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4.Original Petition 5.Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-01015 October 9, 2025 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment reviewed for pre-screen. November 4, 2025 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment was accepted. November 11, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-01015 for a zoning map amendment was assigned to Olivia Cvetko, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. November 17, 2025 Notice was sent to the Glendale Community Council Recognized Community Organization (RCO) informing them of the petitions. Early notification of the project was also sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal. The proposal was posted for an online open house. The proposal can still be viewed online. November 17, 2025 An Early Notification sign was posted on the properties by the applicant. January 1, 2026 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. January 1, 2026 Planning Staff posted notices on City and State websites and sent notices via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notices were mailed. January 1, 2026 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. January 8, 2026 Planning Commission Staff Report was posted. January 14, 2026 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed map amendment. January 16, 2026 Requested Final Draft of Ordinance from Attorney’s Office February 2, 2026 Final Draft of Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-01015 Zoning Map Amendment at 1073 S Navajo Street - Mark Overdevest is requesting approval from the City to amend the zoning at 1073 S Navajo Street From the R-1-5000 Single Family Residential District to the RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District to allow for the construction of additional for-sale homes on the 0.49 acre lot. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at 801.535.7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Olivia Cvetko at 801-535-7285 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by e-mail at Olivia.Cvetko@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://www.slc.gov/planning/2025/10/17/openhouse2025-00704/ The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. ORIGINAL PETITION Property Address: 1073 S Navajo St SLC UT 84104 Parcel ID: 15113010080000 Master Plan: Westside Master Plan Current Zoning District: R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential Proposed Zoning District: RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential Additional items submitted concurrently with this letter: 1. Photos of Historical Development Pattern and Built Environment 2. Supporting goals, objectives, and policies of the City 3. Comparable Approved Zoning Amendments 4. Redevelopment potential under RMF-30 and R-1/5,000 Request: This application seeks to amend the zoning classification for the parcel located at 1073 S Navajo St, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (the “Project” or “Subject Property”) from R -1/5,000 to RMF-30. The current R-1/5,000 zoning, established in the 1990s, no longer aligns with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of Salt Lake City (the “City”) as outlined in Plan Salt Lake, Housing SLC, and the Westside Master Plan (WSMP). Updating the zoning for this property will harmonize land use regulations with the City's stated goals. The RMF-30 Zone is a low-density residential zone that permits slightly higher density than the existing R-1/5,000 Zone. Additionally, the development regulations for RMF-30 are similar to the current zone in terms of bulk, setbacks, and building height. In support of rezoning the property to RMF-30, the applicant respectfully requests that the City balance existing rules and regulations with the flexibility needed for change and growth, as established in the WSMP. Entry-level home ownership used to be more attainable for young families, but today, many SLC residents are not afforded this same opportunity due to the scarcity of family-sized housing and generally unfavorable market conditions. We believe the RMF-30 zone is pivotal in helping address this ongoing market disconnect. Property Information: The parcel is 0.49 acres (over 21,000 square feet) of highly underutilized space, currently featuring only a small 2-bedroom home built in the 1940s. This home contributes minimally to the City’s housing stock. The graphic below outlines the subject parcel and adjacent properties. Notably, the parcels along Navajo are significantly larger, being over five times the size of the properties along 1300W and Concord St. The owners are looking to, bring investment to the community, and are looking to utilize the newly created RMF-30 zone that allows unique infill development opportunities within an existing neighborhood in line with historical development patterns of the community, Westside Master Plan (WSMP), and City housing plans. While it is theoretically possible to try and subdivide the property into flag lots under the R -1/5000 zone, it is not the most practical option as the flag requirements and lot restrictions established in SLC code hinder development potential and functionality. The property owners believe they can create a development in line with the stated goals of the Westside Master Plan with RMF-30. Proposed Map Amendment: Following the historical development pattern and built environment of the neighborhood, the property owners plan to maintain the existing single-family home and build supplemental single-family homes similar in size, scale, and compatibility to the existing neighborhood in accordance with the Westside Master Plan. The RMF-30 zone, with its less restrictive lot size minimum requirements, is in line with the historical development pattern and built environment, adheres to City plans and guidance, and is documented in sections (a) – (h) below with accompanying attachments. (a) The Project will not materially affect adjacent properties. The Project will in no way fundamentally change the residential nature of the neighborhood as the land use will continue to be low density residential. The property owners have already and will continue to engage with the community council and the City to ensure any project will be context sensitive to the existing character of the neighborhood while providing opportunities for new growth and to enhance the sense of place. (b) Consistent Land Use. The land use of the Property will remain residential, not mixed use, and will be consistent with land use in the surrounding neighborhood. Additionally, a drive through the surrounding neighborhood shows small lots and homes throughout. There are multiple duplexes, triplexes, and apartments (some with an R- 1/5,000 or 7000 zoning assignment) within close proximity to the proposed Project, including multiple duplexes on Navajo St. Attached within the application is a document that outlines the historical and existing development pattern in the area, which demonstrates the reasonability of the rezone request. *See attachment 1. “Photos of Historical Development Pattern and Built Environment” While much of Glendale was assigned R-1/5,000 zoning in the 1990s when the zoning code was adopted, the historical development pattern of the area and existing built environment demonstrates a higher density with some homes built as early as the 1870s. Most of the community and its single-family homes would not be permitted under the burdensome lot minimum requirements of the R-1/5,000 zone, as is evidenced by the attached map and highlights (*attachment 1.). R-1/5,000 has the second smallest minimum lot size requirement in the City, and it is still larger in scale than the historical development pattern. The RMF-30 zone was created to provide a variety of housing types that are small in scale suitable for low-density housing, including single-family, and two-family. Smaller homes and lots are part of what gives the community an identity and differentiates it from other parts of the City and has kept it as a more affordable option for many SLC residents. (c) Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt Lake. The property owners recognizes that the Property is in the Westside district and subject to, among other planning documents, the Westside Master Plan. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan which provides for Special Single-Family Allowances. The master plan details the challenges it faces in developing the community and the “barriers in and out of Glendale underscore the community’s need to grow from within”. The subject property (highlighted in yellow with bright red outline) is located within proximity (less than 1000 feet) from a designated neighborhood node. The Westside Master Plan states the following: “Neighborhood nodes rely on the neighboring residential properties because they are not intended to bear a heavy load of new residential development”. In addition to the neighborhood node, a community node and a regional node are within walking distance. Nodes are intended to increase the stability of existing neighborhoods by providing necessary daily or discretionary retail and service options, and by providing opportunities for employment and recreation within the community. “The viability of the nodes relies on people to access their activities and services. To support these uses, more residents are needed within the vicinity”. Page 34 of the WSMP states the following- Special Single-Family Allowances: The Salt Lake City Planning Division should explore regulatory options for permitting unique, single-family residential development within the existing single-family zoning districts. Examples of special single-family developments include small-lot, detached, single-family residential units on parcels that are currently considered too small for development and attached single -family residential units. Multi-Family Infill Allowances: The Salt Lake City Planning Division should explore regulatory options for allowing two- or multi-family development on lots that are zoned for only single-family where appropriate. Appropriate cases include lots that have unique shapes or where the impact on adjacent properties would be negligible due to the unique properties of the parcels. Regulations such as these can help add even a small amount of additional density without impacting on the prevailing single-family character of the Westside. The unique size (.49 acres) and characteristics of the subject property make it an ideal candidate to build from within. *See attachment 2. “Supporting goals, objectives, and policies of the City” for additional adherence to Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt Lake. (d) Comparable Zoning Amendments granted. Similar Zoning Amendments have been granted throughout Salt Lake City, with the most recent and similar request being granted for the City owned parcel at 1050 W 1300 S, which rezoned an R-1/5,000 lot surrounded by single family homes, near the Jordan River, within the “riparian corridor” (which subject property is not) to RMF-30. The same Master Plan and City policies apply to both this property as well as the Subject Property. Another is 238 S concord which was changed from R-1/5000 to RMF-30. *See attachment 3. “Comparable Approved Zoning Amendments” (e) Future Developments. Just a few hundred feet to the south, a proposed large townhome development has been proposed at the old Tejeda’s market fronting Navajo St and Glendale Dr. Below are preliminary renderings of the project. https://buildingsaltlake.com/townhomes-in-glendale-to-be-for-sale-and-energy-efficient/ Another infill project close by is located at 1549 South 1000 West where the plans show 46 townhomes on 2.2 acres detailed below. (f) Adequate Public Facilities and Services. The Project is small scale and limited to residential units/lots, which will have a minimal impact on traffic and other required public facilities. (g) Affordable Housing Incentives consideration. The property owners have closely followed the AHI developments for years. While the plan is a good step in the right direction, the property owners have not been able to make the AHI work or pencil for this project. If the AHI path were to be taken, you really could only add 3 additional units of density. In theory, the property owners could build 1 large 4-Plex on the existing lot; however, they do not believe this is a desirable outcome as the goal is to create modest family sized housing which the City is significantly lacking. Ignoring the AHI and any rezone, as it stands today, a flag lot parcel could be created, the existing home could be demolished, and 2 large homes (4000 sq ft+) with 2 detached ADUs could be built while still meeting all setback and lot coverage requirements of R-1/5,000 without requiring any public input. This would not fit the character of the neighborhood or achieve the goals of the community and City; further, this demonstrates how the current zoning rules do not fit with the historical development pattern of the community. Salt Lake City needs more people in houses, not less We need more people in houses, not less people in bigger houses. *See attachment 4. Redevelopment potential under RMF-30 and R-1/5,000 (h) Community Benefit Analysis. Housing: Provision of affordable or family-sized housing. Throughout the application, the petitioners demonstrate alignment with stated city and community goals and plans. See *Att.2 Supporting goals, objectives, and policies of the City Following the historical development pattern and built environment of the neighborhood, the property owners would plan to maintain the existing single-family home and build additional family sized housing units similar in size, scale, and compatibility to the existing neighborhood in accordance with the Westside Master Plan. In addition, each home would be on its own lot allowing for the opportunity for fee simple ownership opportunities. The RMF-30 zone, with its increased options and flexibility would allow for a much better overall future development, that would be in line with the historical development pattern, built environment, and City plans and guidance. While formal plans and renderings have not been pursued or included in this application, RMF-30 allows for a variety of housing types and forms not included in R/1-5000. SLC is in dire need of missing middle housing options as is identified and highlighted in Housing SLC Plan 2023-2027. This was a major driver to the creation of the RMF-30 zone. An increase in density and development will help the identified nodes in the West Side Master Plan thrive. Looking at comparable comp sales in the neighborhood, as well as the characteristics of the lot location, modest family sized housing units built in this project are not anticipated to sell for greater than the area median priced house. Modernizing the zoning on the property to RMF-30 will bring land use regulations into agreement with stated city goals while incrementally increasing the density allowance. The RMF-30 Zone much like the R- 1/5000 zone is a low-density residential zone in addition, development regulations are similar regarding bulk, setbacks, and building height. Support for Local Businesses: While local business would not be directly allowed on RMF-30 Parcels, the WSMP notes that identified nodes within the neighborhood need local residential support to thrive. Rental History: Over the past 5 years, the home has been rented at market rate and tenants are responsible for utilities. Current Occupants- As of the time of this application, only one tenant lived at the property. In closing: Recent City plans and documents have recognized that as the population of Salt Lake City grows, prices are spiking, leaving folks with fewer housing options and pushing some people out altogether. Family sized housing is desired and needed. This rezone provides the unique opportunity to build in an area where it will cause minimal disruption, and with the increased density of the project will come increased attainability in pricing. Creative infill projects are needed if Salt Lake City wants to create attainable family housing. Implementing these various goals, objectives, and policies, as reflected in the adopted planning documents, requires a unique approach of balancing the existing rules and regulations while exercising flexibility to achieve real and responsive changes that will encourage the market to develop the diverse and affordable housing needed to accommodate the growing community. We believe the Rezone Request is consistent with the City’s development goals and objectives to provide diversity of housing types and to support attractive and well-maintained neighborhoods. We appreciate the City’s consideration of these matters and look forward to working with you. Existing neighborhood development pattern examples: Throughout the Glendale community, there are homes on very narrow lots with small structures. These homes would not meet the lot size requirements or the mandatory street frontage requirements of R-1/5,000 today. Many pockets of Glendale have a historical development pattern that closely resembles RMF-30 zoning. On Navajo as well as Glenrose, there are multiple Duplex structures demonstrating a higher historical pattern of higher density than existing R1 zoning. Below is a representation of built environment with smaller homes with lower setbacks. (YELLOW lot 305-010 is .08 acres) (YELLOW lot 306-021 is .05 acres) (YELLOW lot 334-025 is .05 acres) (BLUE lot 258-004 is .06 acres) (1200 W Yellow .07 acres) KEY CONSIDERATIONS The key considerations listed below were identified through the analysis of the project: 1. Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt Lake 2. Neighborhood Compatibility & Impact 3. Development Potential Key Consideration 1: Implementation of the Westside Master Plan, Housing SLC, and Plan Salt Lake Westside Master Plan (2014) The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is intended to support appropriately scaled housing choices as recommended by the Westside Master Plan. This plan was adopted in 2014 and focuses on land use related opportunities. The plan covers the area that is generally between I-15 and I-215 on the east and west, the city boundary on the south, and I-80 on the north. The subject property on Navajo is within the Westside Master Plan area. In general, the Westside Master Plan supports incremental increase in density by allowing different housing types provided the general scale and characteristics of the surroundings are respected. The policies that relate to neighborhoods identify that there is ‘some opportunity for incremental additions to density and minor adjustments to the development pattern within the Glendale and Poplar Grove neighborhoods.’ The plan specifically calls for different types of housing options, including ADU’s, duplexes and cottage developments. The plan also emphasizes that future housing should be compatible in terms of building height, bulk, setbacks, architecture, landscaping, and building materials. The plan specifically identifies vacant and underutilized parcels as opportune places for infill development and, depending on their size, opportune places for multi-family projects. The Westside Master Plan envisions: “The established and stable neighborhoods of the Westside will remain the core of the community, retaining traditional development patterns while also providing new housing opportunities.” The Glendale neighborhood can be considered stable as there are limited opportunities for large-scale changes to the character and development pattern, but the larger lots and blocks provide flexibility for infill projects. As with many established communities, neighborhood stability is greatly valued by its residents. However, that does not mean there are no opportunities for growth. Nor does it imply that changes are neither desired nor anticipated. For example, some change within the neighborhoods will be required to attract more businesses and services. Although stable areas expect to see minor changes, development should be consistent with the scale of the surrounding structures and new zoning regulations should aim to maintain the existing development characteristics of the neighborhood while allowing appropriately scaled infill development. Nodes Nodes, or intersections, are defined in this plan as ‘integrated centers of activity. The subject property is located within proximity (less than 1000 feet) from a designated neighborhood node. The Westside Master Plan states the following: “Neighborhood nodes rely on the neighboring residential properties because they are not intended to bear a heavy load of new residential development”. In addition to the neighborhood node, a community node and a regional node are within walking distance. Nodes are intended to increase the stability of existing neighborhoods by providing necessary daily or discretionary retail and service options, and by providing opportunities for employment and recreation within the community. “The viability of the nodes relies on people to access their activities and services. To support these uses, more residents are needed within the vicinity”. Proposed The proposal supports neighborhood stability by increasing density at a vacant property, since increasing density by expanding is not an option for the Glendale neighborhood or the Westside as a whole. Its size (.25 acres) and shape with access to multiple streets allow for flexibility in site layout and housing types. The development regulations for the RMF-30 are similar to the existing zone in regard to bulk, setbacks, and building height. Additionally, any new development will be bound by design standards for building materials, ground floor glass, and building entrances, which will ensure high quality design and compatibility with the neighborhood. Housing SLC (2023- 2027) The City has recently adopted a citywide 5-year housing plan includes goals to increase the overall supply of housing through-out Salt Lake City. The goal of the plan is to respond to the ongoing housing crisis by increasing housing stability throughout the City. The plan provide initiatives to “create sustainable, mixed-use, mixed-income neighborhoods with access to jobs, transit, greenspace, and basic amenities.” The proposal would allow more density and housing type options in an existing neighborhood. Plan Salt Lake (2015) Plan Salt Lake is a Citywide vision for the City for the next 25 years and includes guiding principles for the City related to sustainable growth and development. The goal of the plan is to create a city that is resilient, inclusive, and economically viable. With this in mind, the plan outlines goals and initiatives to support a mix of housing types and increased density. Applicable initiatives from the plan are below: Growth: • Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. • Accommodate and promote an increase in the City’s population. Housing: • Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. • Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. The proposed rezone aligns with Plan Salt Lake’s goals for housing and growth. The proposal will allow infill development of an underutilized parcel while increasing the number of housing types and options. Further Excerpts supporting the zoning amendment. The Project is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the City. The Citywide vision, City Housing Plan, HUD Plan, Westside Master Plan, Affordable Residential Guide and Ordinances all recognize, support, and call for increasing the housing supply and expanding housing opportunities throughout the city, including removing local barriers to housing development. Below is supporting verbiage taken directly from adopted city plans and guidance supporting this type of request: Westside Master Plan Goals pg. 4 • Promote reinvestment and redevelopment in the Westside community through changes in land use, improved public infrastructure and community investment to spur development that meets the community’s vision while maintaining the character of Westside's existing stable neighborhoods. • Protect and encourage ongoing investment in existing, low-density residential neighborhoods Opportunities pg. 26 Neighborhoods: There are opportunities for incremental additions to density and minor adjustments to the development pattern to make them more efficient and sustainable. The neighborhoods will see changes through modifications to how Salt Lake City regulates and promotes infill development Neighborhoods pg. 30 Vision: The established and stable neighborhoods of the Westside will remain the core of the community, retaining traditional development patterns while also providing new housing opportunities. Glendale can be considered stable in the sense that there is limited opportunity within the neighborhoods for large-scale changes to the character and development pattern. That does not mean, however, that they are without any opportunities for growth. Nor does it imply that changes are neither desired nor anticipated by the residents of the neighborhood or by the city itself. For example, some change within the neighborhoods will be required to attract more businesses and services. The Potential pg. 33 The current zoning in the majority of the Westside, and in nearly the entirety of the neighborhoods, is for Single-Family residential, which prohibits multi-family development. Another option is a zoning ordinance modification that allows for duplexes in single-family zones provided the infill parcel is over a certain size and the development meets certain design standards to ensure compatibility. Small lot single-family residential infill development, both attached and detached, are also options for adding new residential uses within the neighborhoods. A third option is to create zoning-based incentives to encouraging small-lot development. Can a community that is over 90 percent single-family with little room for large-scale infill development achieve the vision that its residents desire? Throughout the process of developing the Westside Master Plan, it appeared that the residents and stakeholders recognized that the answer is no unless there were substantial changes to the development pattern of the Westside. One of the aims of this plan is to demonstrate that localized changes in the community’s development patterns can bring about the desired vision despite the perceived limitations. Moving Forward pg. 34 Special Single-Family Allowances: The Salt Lake City Planning Division should explore regulatory options for permitting unique, single-family residential development within the existing single-family zoning districts. Examples of special single-family developments include small-lot, detached, single-family residential units. Multi-Family Infill Allowances: The Salt Lake City Planning Division should explore regulatory options for allowing two- or multi-family development on lots that are zoned for only single-family where appropriate. Appropriate cases include lots that have unique shapes or where the impact on adjacent properties would be negligible due to the unique properties of the parcels. Regulations such as these can help add even a small amount of additional density without impacting the prevailing single-family character of the Westside and potentially introduce unique housing types and designs to the community or the city Plan Salt Lake Citywide Vision (adopted 2015) Growth Initiatives: 1. Locate new development in areas with existing infrastructure and amenities, such as transit and transportation corridors. 2. Encourage a mix of land uses. 3. Promote infill and redevelopment of underutilized land. Housing Initiatives: 1. Ensure access to affordable housing citywide (including rental and very low income). 2. Increase the number of medium density housing types and options. 3. Encourage housing options that accommodate aging in place. 4. Direct new growth toward areas with existing infrastructure and services that have the potential to be people-oriented. 5. Enable moderate density increases within existing neighborhoods where appropriate. Salt Lake 5-year housing plan 2023-2027 Key Finding: There is a mismatch between the types of housing the market is producing and the needs of the community. Residents perceive that most new housing is “luxury” while many desire more affordability throughout the city. Additionally, residents want more “missing middle” housing and more family-sized housing. Pg 10: Family Sized Unit shortfall Salt Lake City has a declining proportion of family households, decreasing from 56 percent in 2000 to 43 percent in 2021 (USCB, 2001, 2022). Among regional peer cities, Salt Lake City has the lowest percentage of family-sized housing units (3+ bedrooms) with only 41 percent of all units. Public Engagement Results: There is a mismatch between the types of housing the market is producing and the needs of the community. Residents perceive that most new housing is “luxury” while many desire more affordability throughout the city. Additionally, residents want more “missing middle” housing and more family-sized housing. When asked where they would like to see more affordable housing built, respondents expressed desires to have affordability throughout the city Thriving in Place Study: Displacement in Salt Lake City is significant and getting worse. It is an issue of high concern in the community; nearly everyone reported directly experiencing its impact in their lives and neighborhoods. There are no “more affordable” neighborhoods in Salt Lake City where lower income families can move once displaced. Salt Lake City is growing and there are not enough housing units at every price level, and a significant lack of affordable units for low-income families. There is a consensus view in the community that creating more affordable housing should be a high priority while also protecting renters from being displaced. The patterns of displacement reflect historic patterns of discrimination and segregation, with many areas experiencing high displacement risk being the same as areas that were redlined in the past. Guiding Principles: Increase housing everywhere. In addition, the plan says the city will keep pushing to create more tiny homes and accessory dwellings in existing neighborhoods as well as raising permitted density and building heights around its transit corridors and job centers. Comp #1 PLNPCM2023-00609 - Zoning Map Amendment at 1050 W 1300 S MASTER PLAN: Westside Master Plan Former ZONING DISTRICT: R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District Approved ZONING DISTRICT: RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District This request is for a Zoning Map Amendment for city-owned property at 1050 West 1300 South. Requested to rezone the property from the R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential Zone to the RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential Zone. The purpose of the proposal is to accommodate future residential development and the proposed RMF-30 zone would allow an incremental increase in density and more options for housing types – including duplexes, townhomes, multi-family, and cottage style development. Development within the R-1/5,000 zoning district is limited to primarily single-family dwellings. There is no current development plan or concept for future development. If the proposed rezone is adopted by the City Council, the City would then issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) for development of the property. This proposal is very similar to the Subject Property as it is also surrounded by single-family homes. While the parcel is larger, a good portion of it is in the riparian corridor , which cannot be built on. Comp #2 PLNPCM2024-00389- 238 s Concord st MASTER PLAN: Westside Master Plan Former ZONING DISTRICT: R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District Approved ZONING DISTRICT: RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District Petition to amend the zoning map for 238 S Concord St and 1255 W Pierpoint Ave. The proposed amendment would change the zoning of these properties from R-1/5,000 Single Family Residential to RMF-30 Low Density Multifamily Residential. The applicant has stated that they intend to build family sized housing units on individual lots. Currently between the two lots, there are 10,700 square feet and one single family home. Comp #3 PLNPCM2023-00452 – Zoning Amendment at 450 East 700 South – RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi Family to RMF-30 Low Density Multi Family Residential This request, while already in a higher zoned area, is a good comparison. It shows a similar plan to the Subject Property, where a lot is very underutilized and can accommodate infill development allowed with RMF-30. RMF-30 Development Potential Any future development on the property would be designed to utilize the deep nature of the parcel and minimize impact to the existing street. The RMF-30 zone was primarily created to enable new options for missing middle development that the R1 zones do not allow. Types of housing allowed: Single Family Detached, Single Family Attached, Row housing, Tiny Homes, Cottage Developments, Twin Homes, and more. Below are potential redevelopment ideas for the property. These are simply ideas, not plans or renderings, and are intended to show the possibilities under RMF-30. Detached Single Family Tiny Homes Cottage Homes Attached Single Family Mixed Project R/1-5000 Option As the parcel is today, 2 large single-family homes with ADU’s could be built using a flag lot configuration. We estimate, they could have each home be over 4000 Square feet while meeting bulk, height, and setback requirements under the R/1-5000 zone. While not interested in going this route, it goes to show how the current zone is incentivizing larger houses with less density. AHI Option There is the potential to do a 4-Plex Unit on the parcel while building within the buildable box as is required under the AHI. The property owners are not looking to enter the highly competitive and saturated multi-family rental housing market and instead wish to develop family sized housing, which this city needs greatly. The intent of this example is to simply demonstrate what is allowed on the parcels under the AHI. As was demonstrated above, RMF-30 would provide more flexibility regarding building forms, while still having similar lot, height, and bulk requirements. This page has intentionally been left blank 5. MAILING LIST OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STA OWN_ZIP CHARLES H VIOLETTE (JT); CLARENCE W VIOLETTE (JT); HELEN I VIOLET3346 RIVERCREST DR GRANTS PASS OR 97527 KAYLEIGH MULLEN 1042 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LANCE LANGTON 1052 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 M FM TRST 434 ZINFANDEL CIR CLAYTON CA 94517 RACHAEL HALL (JT); ALISON SCHEIG (JT)1066 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CARL B STENHOLM (TC); GERRYANNE F MOREAU (TC)1084 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MAKAH INVESTMENTS, LLC 10681 S TRAIL RIDGE CIR SANDY UT 84092 HSIAO-AN HUO; DYNASTY EMPIRE PROPERTY, LLC 10013 S ROCKVIEW DR SANDY UT 84092 EMMA F LAMBERT (JT)1434 STONEWALL BND MESQUITE NV 89027 DYNASTY EMPIRE PROPERTY LLC 10013 S ROCKVIEW DR SANDY UT 84092 FIRST FIDELITY MORTGAGE CORP PO BOX 17172 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 GREG J GARCIA (JT); REBA MONTOYA (JT)1078 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SYNDETIC INC PO BOX 17172 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84117 TYLER HADFIELD 1035 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 FRANCINE M KOHART 1043 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 MARK REITER 1053 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 EARL M SUTTON 1061 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 NAVAJO REAL ESTATE, LLC 2162 S BELAIRE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 HTOE WAY (JT); MA LET (JT)1083 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SALT LAKE COUNTY PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 ROBERTO CARRILLO; RC & MAV FAM REV TR 1091 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SCOSHI CAHOON 1101 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 DEAN SCHINDLER 1119 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 RUSSELL S FRANKLIN (JT); MINDY J FRANKLIN-BOWEN (JT); JODI L FRA1129 S NAVAJO ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GONZALO H SANCHEZ (JT); CONCEPCION S ALVAREZ (JT)1040 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GURMINDER SINGH PARMAR; KIRANJIT PARMER 2205 E CHAPARRAL OAK C COTTONWOOD HTS UT 84121 ROSEMARIE HERNANDEZ 1054 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CHRIS FRECKLETON 1062 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LUCIA G PHAM 1068 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GRAYSON M SMITH 1076 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 CLAUDIA MARGARITA TROCHEZ (JT); RENE BENJAMIN VAZQUEZ (JT)1084 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LISSETTE D LOPEZ AQUINO (JT); WILLIAM ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ MOR 1090 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JENNIFER WILSON DAVIS 1096 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AMANDA PARRANTO 1106 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ANNA MARIA CAPUTO LIVING TRUST 06/25/2021 1112 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 WARREN GERRITSEN TRUST 08/02/2017 1126 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 UDIT CHAUHAN (JT); SHEELU KUMARI (JT)1043 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ELIZABETH LANGTON 1053 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 DONALD E CLAUS (JT); ANDREA C ASH (JT)1061 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 OLEN D JR TURNER (JT); IRACI TURNER (JT)1067 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 GERALDINE GRIMSDELL TRUST 5/16/15 1075 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 JOSE LUIS LOPEZ AGUILAR (JT); EDGAR LOPEZ (JT)1083 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 EMILY THOMAS 1089 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 REBECCA RAY 1095 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 THULINH PHAM 1105 S 1300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 1326 PARAMOUNT PROPERTIES LLC 1326 S 900 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 NICHOLAS JAMES SALMON 1062 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SANTANA VILLANUEVA (JT); JULIA VILLANUEVA (JT)1068 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ESMERALDA OROZCO SENCION 1076 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 HALANI UTUONE (JT); VALENITAINE UTUONE (JT)1084 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 LAZARO BUZOT (JT); SANDRA CEDENO (JT)1090 S CONCORD ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 Current Occupant 1036 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1058 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1094 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1112 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1118 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1102 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1078 S NAVAJO ST NFF1 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1082 S NAVAJO ST NFF2 Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1067 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1073 S NAVAJO ST Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1086 S 1300 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1044 S 1300 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1111 S 1300 W Salt Lake City UT 84104 This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2026 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1073 S Navajo Street to rezone the parcel from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1073 S. Navajo Street from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2025-01015. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 14, 2026 to consider a petition from Mark Overdevest to rezone a parcel of property located at 1073 S Navajo Street from R-1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to R-1/7,000 Single-Family Residential District pursuant to petition number PLNPCM2025-01015; and WHEREAS, at its January 14, 2026 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council on the petition; and WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the parcel located at 1073 S Navajo Street (Tax ID No. 15-11- 2 301-008-0000), identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from R- 1/5,000 Single-Family Residential District to RMF-30 Low Density Multi-Family Residential District. SECTION 2. Condition. This ordinance is conditioned upon the owner(s) of the property entering into a development agreement with the city requiring: a. The existing primary home on the site be retained. b. Any additional dwelling units over four units must be for-sale. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___ day of ____________, 2026. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2026 Published: ______________. Ordinance rezoning 1073 S Navajo St. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ___2/2/2026______________________ By: ___________________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 3 Exhibit “A” Legal description of the property Tax ID No. 15-11-301-008-0000 GLENDALE PARK PLAT A" 0729,BEG 500 FT S FR NW COR LOT 61 GLENDALE PARK PLAT A S 70 FT E,306 FT N 70 FT W 306 FT TO BEG. 5110-1241, 5147-1358 ,5151-1080 7153-404 8647-4013 8741-8382 09161-6940 11208-0239" This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 01/21/2026 Date Sent to Council: 01/22/2026 From: Department * Mayor Employee Name: Johnston, Andrew E-mail Andrew.johnston@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 01/22/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 01/22/2026 Subject: No Camping Ordinance Additional Staff Contact: Rachel OttoSara Montoya Presenters/Staff Table Rachel.Otto@slc.govSara.Montoya@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance. Background/Discussion The intent of this transmittal is to update Salt Lake City ’s municipal code to address challenges arising from the use of public spaces as living accommodations, which exceeds the intended purpose of those areas. The comprehensive revisions are intended to promote efficiency in government, foster community harmony, preserve public spaces for their intended use, and address public health, safety and welfare concerns, all while doing so in a humane and compassionate manner that focuses enforcement on conduct causing negative impacts to the community. It is the city ’s goal to ensure these public spaces are equally accessible to all residents and visitors of the city. The city ’s current ordinance prohibits camping or erecting tents and other camping equipment in any city park. This narrow prohibition does not address more recent issues arising from the increased use of public spaces (including parks but also encompassing sidewalks and other public property) as residential spaces while not using any camping equipment at all, but which nonetheless poses risks to public health and safety. The proposed ordinance changes seek to better define these prohibited activities and better equip the city with enforcement mechanisms to preserve these public spaces for equal enjoyment by all. The current camping provision and other regulations on the use of public spaces such as parks, park strips, sidewalks, streets, and other public property, are dispersed throughout various chapters of the municipal code, which can be confusing to citizens and city staff. Consolidating these regulations under Chapter 11.12, Offenses Against Public Order, and defining key terms brings the city ’s camping regulations and related ordinances into a unified, clearer framework that enhances readability, improves understanding, and promotes more efficient and consistent government oversight. It is important to note that any prohibition on camping within the city is but one tool available to the city to address the adverse impacts on public health, safety, and access to public spaces that have accompanied the increase of people living in spaces not meant for human habitation; it is not intended as a punitive enforcement tool to be used against unhoused individuals. Similarly, the proposed changes are not meant to address the underlying causes of homelessness—those must be addressed through proactive policies meant to address housing, shelter and other services. The new proposal would: •Continue to broadly prohibit camping in parks, as well as extend this prohibition to other public property. This prohibition is subject to a few notable exceptions, including permission by the government property owner, designated routes prior to and during permitted parades, and pursuant to a Mayoral declaration of emergency and any accompanying orders. o Notwithstanding the allowable exceptions, under no circumstance may camping activities be permitted if they pose an immediate threat or an unreasonable risk of harm to any person or to the public health or safety, or if they pose a disruption to vital government services. o Additionally, even under the allowable exceptions, camping activities are never permitted within 1000 feet from an overnight shelter, permanent supportive housing, designated warming/cooling center, hospital, urgent care facility, or walk-in health clinic; within 500 feet from any daycare, senior center, primary or secondary school; within 10 feet from a driveway or building entrance/exit; or within an RCO riparian corridor. •Consolidate camping prohibitions from two different chapters of code (11.12, Offenses Against Public Order and 15.08, Park Rules) into one section within Chapter 11.12, Offenses Against Public Order.•Define “camp” or “camping” and other key terms. The definitions seek to provide a modern definition reflective of the current challenges arising from the use of public property as residential spaces or other forms of living accommodation. The defined term “camp” or “camping” includes:o Sleeping outdoors in or on public property closed to the public, or between the hours of 11:00PM and 5:00AM.o Sleeping in a vehicle in or on public property closed to the public, or between the hours of 11:00PM and 5:00AM.o Leaving personal property unattended in or on public property closed to the public.o Using a vehicle in or on public property for living accommodation purposes.o Using or occupying public property as a residence or dwelling for living accommodation purposes. •Provide clarity on what constitutes “using or occupying public property for living accommodation purposes” by providing that evidence or observations of two or more of the following constitutes indica that public property is being used for living accommodation purposes: sleeping, storing of personal property, preparing or consuming meals, using camp stoves or otherwise making fires in an unauthorized area, establishing or occupying sleeping quarters or otherwise laying down of bedding for sleeping purposes, erecting or occupying temporary structures, including but not limited to tents, tarps, tarpaulins, huts, lean-tos, awnings, or shacks, or engaging in personal hygiene activities, toileting or bathing outside designated facilities. •Consolidate and clarify regulations related to vehicular and pedestrian thoroughfares and points of building ingress and egress while continuing to prohibit individuals from obstructing these spaces for more than 2 minutes to help ensure safe and unobstructed access to the public for their intended purpose. The administration understands that some may feel that this time frame is not sufficient time for compliance, and is open to other reasonable proposals, provided they do not unduly burden city staff charged with enforcement. •Continue to regulate the use of city parks and public squares through designated park hours and provide more clarity that adjacent park strips are subject to the same closures as their neighboring park or public square. The hours of closure have been updated to better reflect the current uses of city parks and public squares, ensuring they remain accessible, well-managed, and responsive to community needs. We understand that this proposed ordinance will not address all current and future nuisance issues occurring in parks and other public spaces. Some of those should be handled elsewhere in city code. We also want to be clear that the intent of the new ordinance is to protect all people’s right to access and use public parks and other spaces for the purposes for which they are intended, and to do so in ways that do not compromise general public health and safety or inhibit the accessibility of all people to those spaces. To these ends, we have proposed language in a “Purpose” section within the draft ordinance that is intended to supplement the ordinance’s reading and guide enforcement policies developed by police and other city departments to fulfill its intent. Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing Propose ordinance would have an impact on many city departments and will have an interest from the general public. Public Process City council public hearing. This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ______ of 2026 (Camping on or Obstructing Public Property and Park Rules) An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to camping on public grounds, streets, parks, and playgrounds, park hours, disposing of unclaimed property, and obstructing sidewalks WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”) considers one of its foremost responsibilities to set standards for the preservation and protection of human life, health and safety of all City residents; WHEREAS, the City has seen an increase in the use of public spaces a living accommodations, for example, for uses such as sleeping, storing personal property, preparing or cooking meals, and toileting or personal hygiene, which uses exceed the intended purpose of public spaces and compromise public health, safety, and welfare; WHEREAS, the City currently prohibits camping, lodging, cooking, making a fire, pitching a tent, fly, lean to, tarpaulin, or any other type of camping equipment in public spaces; WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the current prohibition on camping to more broadly encompass all living accommodation activity that more accurately describes the conduct being observed in public spaces throughout the City, as well as to extend this prohibition to apply to the use of vehicles as living accommodations; WHEREAS, it is also the purpose of the City to establish a process for the removal of encampments and personal property found on public property to promote the health safety, and welfare of City residents and users of public property. WHEREAS the City additionally wishes to consolidate and clarify various ordinances in City code that regulate the use and obstruction of public spaces and rights of way, to reduce confusion among City staff and citizens and ensure proper enforcement; 2 WHEREAS, the City is committed to protecting the rights of individuals related to their personal property and to treating individuals and their property with respect and consideration in the enforcement of these ordinances; and WHEREAS, for these purposes, and with the balance of these critical interests in mind, the City finds it necessary to make certain amendments to the Salt Lake City Code as provided herein. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. That Chapter 11.12 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to camping on public grounds, streets, parks, and playgrounds, is hereby amended as follows: Chapter 11.12 Offenses Against Public Order 11.12.080: CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY: A. PURPOSE. The City has a vital government interest in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of all inhabitants in the City by ensuring that the streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public property are maintained in a clean, sanitary, and accessible condition and kept safe and orderly for any persons using or passing upon such public property. These interests are nonetheless intended to be balanced by the essential human dignity and civil rights of all City inhabitants, and in enacting this ordinance, it is not the City’s intent to criminalize homelessness or violate any person’s constitutional rights. Enforcement of this ordinance shall be undertaken to avoid such results and enforcement efforts shall be focused on mitigating adverse impacts to public health, safety, and welfare that may arise from camping. B. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this section the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein: “Abandoned personal property” means personal property that has been discarded, or the owner is not present or is unable to be identified. 3 “Camp” or “Camping” means: 1. Sleeping outdoors in or on public property closed to the public, or between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) PM and five o’clock (5:00) AM; 2. Sleeping in a vehicle, including but not limited to, a recreational vehicle, travel trailer, motor coach, or motor home in or on public property closed to the public, or between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) PM and five o’clock (5:00) AM; 3. Leaving personal property unattended in or on public property closed to the public; 4. Using a vehicle, including but not limited to, a recreational vehicle, travel trailer, motor coach, or motor home in or on public property as a residence or dwelling, whether temporary or permanent, for living accommodation purposes; or 5. Using or occupying public property as a residence or dwelling, whether temporary or permanent, for living accommodation purposes. Observations and/or evidence of any combination of at least two of the following are indicia that public property is being used for living accommodation purposes: sleeping, storing of personal property, preparing or consuming meals, using camp stoves or otherwise making fires in an unauthorized area, establishing or occupying sleeping quarters or otherwise laying down of bedding for sleeping purposes, erecting or occupying temporary structures, including but not limited to tents, tarps, tarpaulins, huts, lean-tos, awnings, or shacks, or engaging in personal hygiene activities, toileting or bathing outside designated facilities. “Encampment” means personal property, including but not limited to vehicles, including recreational vehicles, travel trailers, motor coaches, tents, tarpaulins, chairs, cots, beds, bedding materials, huts, awnings, lean-tos, shacks, items used to cook or prepare food, household furniture items used to engage in personal hygiene activities, and other items used to facilitate camping. “Overnight shelter” means a public or private facility whether permanent, temporary, or emergency in nature, with all necessary governmental occupancy approvals, open to an individual or a family experiencing homelessness to house the individual or family at no charge. 4 “Park strip” means the portion of the right-of-way between a curb, or a place where a curb would be located if improvements were installed, and where a sidewalk is located or would be installed. “Personal property” means any tangible item reasonably recognizable as belonging to a person. Personal property does not include litter, trash, junk, discarded items, and other types of waste, or property owned by the United States of America and its agencies, or the state of Utah or any of its political subdivisions, including Salt Lake City Corporation or any department thereof. “Public property” means any real property, building, or structure owned, used, or leased by the United States of America and its agencies, or the state of Utah or any of its political subdivisions, including Salt Lake City Corporation or any department thereof, regardless of whether such public property is vacant or occupied and actively used for any public purpose. Public property includes any street, highway, sidewalk, park strip, alley, traffic island or median, park, public square, open space, trail, path, bench, equipment, and other similar property. “Reasonable notice” means notice reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise a person that camping is prohibited at a particular location and, where personal property is deposited, affording the person time to gather their personal property and depart. “Store,” “Stored,” “Storing,” or “Storage” means to put aside or accumulate for use when needed, to put for safekeeping, and/or place or leave personal property on public property. Moving personal property to another location on public property or returning personal property to the same area on a daily or regular basis shall be considered storing and shall not be considered to be removing the personal property from public property. This definition does not include personal property left on public property pursuant to the express written permission of the City, or as otherwise authorized by law. C. CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION PROHIBITED 1. No person may camp or maintain an encampment in or upon any public property unless: 5 a. The person has the authorization of the property owner to camp at that location; b. The public property is along a permitted parade route, and the person is camping in the 24 hours prior to and through the duration of such parade; or c. Camping is necessary after the Mayor declares a local emergency in accordance with chapter 22.03 of this code. 2. At all times, regardless of whether camping would otherwise be permitted under subsection 1 herein, it is unlawful for any person to camp or to maintain an encampment: a. Where such activity poses an immediate threat or an unreasonable risk of harm to any person; b. Where such activity poses an immediate threat or an unreasonable risk of harm to public health or safety; c. Where such activity poses a disruption to vital government services. d. Within 1000 feet from the property boundary of an overnight shelter, permanent supportive housing, designated warming or cooling center, hospital, urgent care facility, or walk in clinic for physical or mental health. e. Within 500 feet from the property boundary of any daycare, senior center, and primary or secondary schools. f. Within 10 feet of a driveway or a building’s entrance and exit. g. Within an RCO riparian corridor overlay as defined in Section 21A.13.34 of this code. 6 3. Camping in a vehicle is also subject to the parking regulations set forth in Chapter 12.56 of this code. D. REMOVAL OF UNLAWFUL ENCAMPMENT 1. Upon discovery of activities in violation of this section, removal of an encampment by City employees and its authorized agents may occur if: a. After reasonable notice, the individual refuses to remove their personal property from the public property; in areas where camping frequently occurs, reasonable notice may be provided by signage. b. Encampment appears to be abandoned personal property. c. There is probable cause for law enforcement officials to believe that illegal activities other than camping are occurring at the encampment. d. There is immediate danger to human life, health, or safety, including possible contamination of public or private property by unsanitary and/or hazardous waste or materials. e. Removal of the encampment does not conflict with any provision of an applicable state or federal law. 2. An encampment that has not been abandoned may not be removed during a code blue event pursuant to Utah Code, Section 35A-16-701, et seq., or its successor. E. REMOVAL, DISPOSITION, AND RELEASE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY 1. Personal Property that comes into the possession of a Salt Lake City employee in their capacity of a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law enforcement agency shall be gathered, retained, and released, in accordance with Utah Code Title 77, Chapters 11a through 11d, section 2.10, Article IV of this Code, and any applicable Salt Lake City Corporation ordinances, regulations, and policies. 7 2. Upon removal of an encampment by City employees and its authorized agents, all abandoned personal property, litter, trash, junk, other types of waste, and items in an unsanitary condition may be immediately discarded. F. ENFORCEMENT AND MITIGATION Upon conviction for a violation of this ordinance, in addition to any other factors deemed appropriate by the Court, the Court shall consider in mitigation whether or not the person immediately removed all personal property and litter, including, but not limited to, bottles, cans, and garbage from the encampment after being informed it was in violation of the law. G. APPLICATION TO CITY PROPERTY OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS This Chapter applies to public property owned by Salt Lake City Corporation that is located outside the City’s municipal limits. H. CONFLICT OF LAW If any provision of this section conflicts with a provision of an applicable state or federal law or regulation, such law or regulation shall supersede the conflicting provision of this chapter. 11.12.130: OBSTRUCTING THOROUGHFARES: A. DEFINITIONS. For purpose of this section the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein: “Park strip” means the portion of the right-of-way between a curb, or a place where a curb would be located if improvements were installed, and where a sidewalk is located or would be installed. “Street” means the roadway portion of the right-of-way between the curbs, or places where a curb would be located if improvements were installed, and is used primarily for vehicular and bicycle travel. 8 “Sidewalk” means the paved portion of the right-of-way, outside of the curb, or a place where a curb would be located if improvements were installed, and the adjacent property lines, and is used primarily for pedestrian travel. B. It is unlawful for any person to obstruct any building entrance or exit, street, sidewalk, park strip, traffic island or median, driveway, trail, or other public place used as a thoroughfare for vehicular or pedestrian travel by sitting, lying, or sleeping, or by storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property for a period longer than two (2) minutes, or in a manner that obstructs passage as provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, PL 101-336, 42 USC section 12101 et seq, as amended from time to time. SECTION 2. That Section 15.08.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to park hours, is hereby amended as follows: 15.08.020: PARK HOURS; DESIGNATED: A. All parks as defined in section 15.08.010 of this code, which includes Library Square and the Public Safety Building plaza, and public squares as defined in section 15.12.020 of this code, as well as the park strips adjacent to such parks and public squares shall be closed to the public between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. and five o’clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning, with the exception of: 1. Lee Charles Miller Bird Refuge and Nature Park, which shall be closed to the public between the hours of nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning; 2. Donner Trail Park and East Bench Preserve, between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning; 3. All parks of the City which are five (5) acres or less in size, whether or not specifically named or described in this title, which shall be closed to the public between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning, except for 9 City Creek Park, which is closed between the hours of eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning; and 4. The Memorial House in Memory Grove shall be closed to public use at twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight; outdoor activities on the leased south lawn shall be closed at eleven thirty o'clock (11:30) P.M.; and the Memorial House shall be locked and vacant no later than two o'clock (2:00) A.M. Between twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight and two o'clock (2:00) A.M., use of the Memorial House shall be limited to employees cleaning the premises after an activity. B. No person or persons shall be permitted in said parks, either on foot or on or in any type of vehicle while the park or public square is closed. SECTION 3. That Section 15.08.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to camping on lands under the jurisdiction of the Department of Public Lands, is hereby amended as follows: 15.08.080: RESERVED. SECTION 4. That Sections 2.10.100, 2.10.110, and 2.10.120 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to disposition of unclaimed property, are hereby amended as follows: 2.10.100: DEFINITIONS: LOST OR MISLAID PROPERTY: A. Any property that comes into the possession of a Salt Lake City employee in their capacity of a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law enforcement agency: 1. That is not claimed by anyone who is identified as the owner of the property; or 2. For which no owner or interest holder can be found after a reasonable and diligent search; B. Includes any property received by Salt Lake City employees in their capacity as a peace officer or law enforcement agency from a person claiming to have found the property; and 10 C. Does not include property seized by Salt Lake City employees in their capacity as a peace officer or law enforcement agency pursuant to title 24, forfeiture and disposition of property act, Utah state code. PROPERTY HELD AS EVIDENCE: Any property received in evidence by a court submitted by a city agency. PUBLIC INTEREST USE: Use by a governmental agency as approved by the city council as provided in section 2.10.150 of this chapter; or use by a bona fide charity registered with the state of Utah as approved by the city council. UNCLAIMED PROPERTY: Tangible and intangible property that comes into possession of a Salt Lake City employee in their capacity as a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law enforcement agency, through circumstances not involving criminal procedures in which the owner is either unknown or unavailable to take possession of said property. 2.10.110: DISPOSITION OF LOST OR MISLAID PROPERTY: Lost or mislaid property shall be disposed of in accordance with Utah code chapter 77-11d as amended, or its successor statute. 2.10.120: DISPOSITION OF FOUND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY TO FINDER: Unclaimed property shall be disposed of in accordance with Utah code chapter 77-11d as amended, or its successor statute. SECTION 5. That Section 14.20.100 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to loitering on a sidewalk, is hereby amended as follows: 14.20.100: RESERVED: SECTION 6. That Section 12.76.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to obstruction of sidewalks, is hereby amended as follows: 12.76.090: RESERVED: 11 SECTION 7. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the date of its first publication. 12 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _____ day of ______________, 2026. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR _______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. _________ of 2026. Published: ___________________. Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE 1 No. ______ of 2026 2 (Camping on or Obstructing Public Property and Park Rules) 3 An ordinance amending various sections of the Salt Lake City Code relating to camping 4 on public grounds, streets, parks, and playgrounds, park hours, disposing of unclaimed property, 5 and obstructing sidewalks 6 WHEREAS, Salt Lake City Corporation (the “City”) considers one of its foremost 7 responsibilities to set standards for the preservation and protection of human life, health and 8 safety of all City residents; 9 WHEREAS, the City has seen an increase in the use of public spaces a living 10 accommodations, for example, for uses such as sleeping, storing personal property, preparing or 11 cooking meals, and toileting or personal hygiene, which uses exceed the intended purpose of 12 public spaces and compromise public health, safety, and welfare; 13 WHEREAS, the City currently prohibits camping, lodging, cooking, making a fire, 14 pitching a tent, fly, lean to, tarpaulin, or any other type of camping equipment in public spaces; 15 WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the current prohibition on camping to more broadly 16 encompass all living accommodation activity that more accurately describes the conduct being 17 observed in public spaces throughout the City, as well as to extend this prohibition to apply to 18 the use of vehicles as living accommodations; 19 WHEREAS, it is also the purpose of the City to establish a process for the removal of 20 encampments and personal property found on public property to promote the health safety, and 21 welfare of City residents and users of public property. 22 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT WHEREAS the City additionally wishes to consolidate and clarify various ordinances in 23 City code that regulate the use and obstruction of public spaces and rights of way, to reduce 24 confusion among City staff and citizens and ensure proper enforcement; 25 WHEREAS, the City is committed to protecting the rights of individuals related to their 26 personal property and to treating individuals and their property with respect and consideration in 27 the enforcement of these ordinances; and 28 WHEREAS, for these purposes, and with the balance of these critical interests in mind, 29 the City finds it necessary to make certain amendments to the Salt Lake City Code as provided 30 herein. 31 Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 32 SECTION 1. That Chapter 11.12 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to camping on 33 public grounds, streets, parks, and playgrounds, is hereby amended as follows: 34 Chapter 11.12 35 Offenses Against Public Order 36 11.12.080: CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY GROUNDS, STREETS, PARKS, AND 37 PLAYGROUNDS: 38 A. It is unlawful for any person to camp, lodge, cook, make a fire or pitch a tent, fly, lean to, 39 tarpaulin, or any other type of camping equipment on any "public grounds", as defined in 40 subsection B of this section, upon any portion of a "street", as defined in section 1.04.010 of this 41 code, or in any park or playground, unless allowed by section 15.08.080 of this code. It is 42 unlawful for any person using or benefiting from the use of any of the foregoing items of 43 camping equipment to fail to remove the same for more than five (5) minutes after being 44 requested to do so by any police office. PURPOSE. The City has a vital government interest in 45 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of all inhabitants in the City by ensuring that 46 the streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public property are maintained in a clean, sanitary, and 47 accessible condition and kept safe and orderly for any persons using or passing upon such public 48 property. These interests are nonetheless intended to be balanced by the essential human dignity 49 and civil rights of all City inhabitants, and in enacting this ordinance, it is not the City’s intent to 50 criminalize homelessness or violate any person’s constitutional rights. Enforcement of this 51 ordinance shall be undertaken to avoid such results and enforcement efforts shall be focused on 52 mitigating adverse impacts to public health, safety, and welfare that may arise from camping. 53 B. For the purpose of this section, the term "public grounds" means any real property owned 54 in whole or in part by the United States Of America and its agencies, or the state of Utah or any 55 of its political subdivisions, including Salt Lake City Corporation, upon which no camping has 56 been authorized by the owner. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this section the following terms, 57 phrases, words, and their derivations shall have the meaning given herein: 58 “Abandoned personal property” means personal property that has been discarded, or the 59 owner is not present or is unable to be identified. 60 “Camp” or “Camping” means: 61 1. Sleeping outdoors in or on public property closed to the public, or between the hours 62 of eleven o’clock (11:00) PM and five o’clock (5:00) AM; 63 2. Sleeping in a vehicle, including but not limited to, a recreational vehicle, travel 64 trailer, motor coach, or motor home in or on public property closed to the public, or 65 between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) PM and five o’clock (5:00) AM; 66 3. Leaving personal property unattended in or on public property closed to the public; 67 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4. Using a vehicle, including but not limited to, a recreational vehicle, travel trailer, 68 motor coach, or motor home in or on public property as a residence or dwelling, 69 whether temporary or permanent, for living accommodation purposes; or 70 5. Using or occupying public property as a residence or dwelling, whether temporary or 71 permanent, for living accommodation purposes. 72 Observations and/or evidence of any combination of at least two of the following are indica that 73 public property is being used for living accommodation purposes: sleeping, storing of personal 74 property, preparing or consuming meals using camp stoves or otherwise making fires in an 75 unauthorized area, establishing or occupying sleeping quarters or otherwise laying down of 76 bedding for sleeping purposes, erecting or occupying temporary structures, including but not 77 limited to tents, tarps, tarpaulins, huts, lean-tos awnings, or shacks, or engaging in personal 78 hygiene activities, toileting or bathing outside designated facilities. 79 “Encampment” means personal property, including but not limited to vehicles, including 80 recreational vehicles, travel trailers, motor coaches, tents tarpaulins, chairs cots, beds, bedding 81 materials, huts, awnings, lean-tos, shacks, items used to cook or prepare food, household 82 furniture items, items used to engage in personal hygiene activities, and other items or equipment 83 used to facilitate camping. 84 “Overnight shelter” means a public or private facility whether permanent, temporary, or 85 emergency in nature, with all necessary governmental occupancy approvals, open to an 86 individual or a family experiencing homelessness to house the individual or family at no charge. 87 “Park strip” means the portion of the right-of-way between a curb, or a place where a curb 88 would be located if improvements were installed, and where a sidewalk is located or would be 89 installed. 90 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT “Personal property” means any tangible item reasonably recognizable as belonging to a person. 91 Personal property does not include litter, trash, junk, discarded items, and other types of waste, 92 or property owned by the United States of America and its agencies, or the state of Utah or any 93 of its political subdivisions, including Salt Lake City Corporation or any department thereof. 94 “Public property” means any real property, building, or structure owned, used, or leased by the 95 United States of America and its agencies, or the state of Utah or any of its political subdivisions, 96 including Salt Lake City Corporation or any department thereof, regardless of whether such 97 public property is vacant or occupied and actively used for any public purpose. Public property 98 includes any street, highway, sidewalk, park strip, alley, traffic island or median, park, public 99 square, open space, trail, path, bench, equipment, and other similar property. 100 “Reasonable notice” means notice reasonably calculated under all the circumstances to apprise 101 a person that camping is prohibited at a particular location and, where personal property is 102 deposited, affording the person time to gather their personal property and depart. 103 “Store,” “Stored,” “Storing,” or “Storage” means to put aside or accumulate for use when 104 needed, to put for safekeeping, and/or place or leave personal property on public property. 105 Moving personal property to another location on public property or returning personal property 106 to the same area on a daily or regular basis shall be considered storing and shall not be 107 considered to be removing the personal property from public property. This definition does not 108 include personal property left on public property pursuant to the express written permission of 109 the City, or as otherwise authorized by law. 110 C. CAMPING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION PROHIBITED 111 1. No person may camp or maintain an encampment in or upon any public property 112 unless: 113 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT a. The person has the authorization of the property owner to camp at that 114 location; 115 b. The public property is along a permitted parade route, and the person is 116 camping in the 24 hours prior to and through the duration of such parade; 117 or 118 c. Camping is necessary after the Mayor declares a local emergency in 119 accordance with chapter 22.03 of this code. 120 2. At all times, regardless of whether camping would otherwise be permitted under 121 subsection 1 herein, it is unlawful for any person to camp or to maintain an 122 encampment: 123 a. Where such activity poses an immediate threat or an unreasonable risk of 124 harm to any person; 125 b. Where such activity poses an immediate threat or an unreasonable risk of 126 harm to public health or safety; 127 c. Where such activity poses a disruption to vital government services. 128 d. Within 1000 feet from the property boundary of an overnight shelter, 129 permanent supportive housing, designated warming or cooling center, 130 hospital, urgent care facility, or walk in clinic for physical or mental 131 health. 132 e. Within 500 feet from the property boundary of any daycare, senior center, 133 and primary or secondary schools. 134 f. Within 10 feet of a driveway or a building’s entrance and exit. 135 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT g. Within an RCO riparian corridor overlay as defined in Section 21A.13.34 136 of this code. 137 3. Camping in a vehicle is also subject to the parking regulations set forth in Chapter 138 12.56 of this code. 139 D. REMOVAL OF UNLAWFUL ENCAMPMENT 140 1. Upon discovery of activities in violation of this section, removal of an 141 encampment or other personal property by City employees and its authorized 142 agents may occur if: 143 a. After reasonable notice, the individual refuses to remove their personal 144 property from the public property; in areas where camping frequently 145 occurs, reasonable notice may be provided by signage. 146 b. Encampment appears to be abandoned personal property. 147 c. There is probable cause for law enforcement officials to believe that 148 illegal activities other than camping are occurring at the encampment. 149 d. There is immediate danger to human life, health, or safety, including 150 possible contamination of public or private property by unsanitary and/or 151 hazardous waste or materials. 152 e. Removal of the encampment does not conflict with any provision of an 153 applicable state or federal law . 154 2. An encampment that has not been abandoned may not be removed during a code 155 blue event pursuant to Utah Code, Section 35A-16-701, et seq., or its successor. 156 E. REMOVAL, DISPOSITION, AND RELEASE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY 157 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 1. Personal Property that comes into the possession of a Salt Lake City employee in 158 their capacity of a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law enforcement agency shall be gathered, 159 retained, and released, in accordance with Utah Code Title 77, Chapters 11a through 11d, section 160 2.10, Article IV of this Code, and any applicable Salt Lake City Corporation ordinances, 161 regulations, and policies. 162 2. Upon removal of an encampment by City employees and its authorized agents, all 163 abandoned personal property, litter, trash, junk, other types of waste, and items in an unsanitary 164 condition may be immediately discarded. 165 F. ENFORCEMENT AND MITIGATION 166 Upon conviction for a violation of this ordinance, in addition to any other factors deemed 167 appropriate by the Court, the Court shall consider in mitigation whether or not the person 168 immediately removed all personal property and litter, including, but not limited to, bottles, cans, 169 and garbage from the encampment after being informed it was in violation of the law. 170 G. APPLICATION TO CITY PROPERTY OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS 171 This Chapter applies to public property owned by Salt Lake City Corporation that is located 172 outside the City’s municipal limits. 173 H. CONFLICT OF LAW 174 If any provision of this section conflicts with a provision of an applicable state or federal law or 175 regulation, such law or regulation shall supersede the conflicting provision of this chapter. 176 11.12.090: OBSTRUCTING THOROUGHFARES: 177 A. DEFINITIONS. For purpose of this section the following terms, phrases, words, and their 178 derivations shall have the meaning given herein: 179 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT “Park strip” means the portion of the right-of-way between a curb, or a place where a curb 180 would be located if improvements were installed, and where a sidewalk is located or would be 181 installed. 182 “Street” means the roadway portion of the right-of-way between the curbs, or places where a 183 curb would be located if improvements were installed, and is used primarily for vehicular and 184 bicycle travel. 185 “Sidewalk” means the paved portion of the right-of-way, outside of the curb, or a place where a 186 curb would be located if improvements were installed, and the adjacent property lines, and is 187 used primarily for pedestrian travel. 188 B. It is unlawful for any person to obstruct any building entrance or exit, street, sidewalk, 189 park strip, traffic island or median, driveway, trail, or other public place used as a thoroughfare 190 for vehicular or pedestrian travel by sitting, lying, or sleeping, or by storing, using, maintaining, 191 or placing personal property for a period longer than two (2) minutes, or in a manner that 192 obstructs passage as provided by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, PL 101-336, 42 193 USC section 12101 et seq, as amended from time to time. 194 SECTION 2. That Section15.08.020 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to park hours, 195 is hereby amended as follows: 196 15.08.020: PARK HOURS; DESIGNATED: 197 A. All parks, shall be closed to the public between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. 198 and five o’clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning as defined in section 15.08.010 of this code, 199 which includes Library Square and the Public Safety Building plaza, and public squares as 200 defined in section 15.12.020 of this code, as well as the park strips adjacent to such parks and 201 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT public squares shall be closed to the public between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. and 202 five o’clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning, with the exception of: 203 1. Lee Charles Miller Bird Refuge and Nature Park, which shall be closed to the 204 public between the hours of nine o'clock (9:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following 205 morning; 206 2. Pioneer Park, which shall be closed to the public: a) from May 1 through 207 September 30, between the hours of eleven o’clock (11:00) P.M. and five o’clock (5:00) A.M. 208 the following morning; and b) from October 1 through April 30, between one-half (1/2) hour 209 after sunset to seven o’clock (7:00) A.M. the following morning, except that in connection with 210 events or activities at Pioneer Park for which a permit has been issued under title 3, chapter 3.50 211 of this Code, the Director of Public Services, or his or her designee, shall, at the request of the 212 sponsor of such event or activity, allow Pioneer Park to remain open until eleven o’clock (11:00) 213 P.M. for not to exceed three (3) consecutive days during which the event or activity is occurring 214 Donner Trail Park and East Bench Preserve, between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and 215 five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning; and 216 3. Donner Trail Park and East Bench Preserve, each of which shall be closed to the 217 public between the hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following 218 morning; and All parks of the City which are five (5) acres or less in size, whether or not 219 specifically named or described in this title, which shall be closed to the public between the 220 hours of ten o'clock (10:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning, except for 221 City Creek Park, which is closed between the hours of eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. and five 222 o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning. 223 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 4. With the exception of City Creek Park, which shall be closed to the public 224 between the hours of eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following 225 morning, all parks of the City five (5) acres or less in size, whether or not specifically named or 226 described in this title, which shall be closed to the public between the hours of ten o'clock 227 (10:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. the following morning The Memorial House in 228 Memory Grove shall be closed to public use at twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight; outdoor 229 activities on the leased south lawn shall be closed at eleven thirty o'clock (11:30) P.M.; and the 230 Memorial House shall be locked and vacant no later than two o'clock (2:00) A.M. Between 231 twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight and two o'clock (2:00) A.M., use of the Memorial House shall 232 be limited to employees cleaning the premises after an activity. 233 B. The Memorial House in Memory Grove shall be closed to public use at twelve o'clock 234 (12:00) midnight; outdoor activities on the leased south lawn shall be closed at eleven thirty 235 o'clock (11:30) P.M.; and the Memorial House shall be locked and vacant no later than two 236 o'clock (2:00) A.M. Between twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight and two o'clock (2:00) A.M., use 237 of the Memorial House shall be limited to employees cleaning the premises after an activity. No 238 person or persons shall be permitted in said parks, either on foot or on or in any type of vehicle 239 while the park or public square is closed. 240 C. No person or persons shall be permitted in said parks, either on foot or on or in any type 241 of vehicle, during such hours unless for the express purpose of traveling directly through the park 242 on a public street that passes through the park. 243 SECTION 3. That Section 15.08.080 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to camping on 244 lands under the jurisdiction of the Department of Public Lands, is hereby amended as follows: 245 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 15.08.080: RESERVED. CAMPING 246 A. No person shall camp, lodge, make a fire or pitch a tent, fly, lean to, tarpaulin, or any 247 other type of camping equipment in any park except: 248 1. In cases of local emergency as declared by the Mayor of the City. 249 2. By permit issued to youth groups the majority of whose members’ ages are at 250 least eight (8) years of age, but no more than seventeen (17) years of age, under the following 251 conditions: 252 a. The youth are accompanied by adult leaders in the ratio of two (2) adults for 253 every ten (10) youth at all times while the youth are camping. 254 b. The youth group provides adequate police and fire security to ensure the safety 255 of the campers and garbage removal and cleanup. The sponsor shall submit a plan along with an 256 application for a special events permit to the City that shall be reviewed and approved by the 257 Public Services Department Director, the Fire and Police Chiefs, or their designees, who will 258 forward a recommendation to the Mayor as to whether or not the request for camping should be 259 granted. Application for the special events permit shall be made directly to the Special Events 260 Coordinator who shall forward all accompanying information to the appropriate departments. 261 c. The youth group files a bond in the amount of ten thousand dollars 262 ($10,000.00) to compensate the City for any damage to the park caused by the youth group 263 during its camping activities. 264 d. The youth group files a certificate of insurance in the aggregate amount of one 265 million dollars ($1,000,000.00), which names the City as an additional insured. 266 e. No camping is allowed in any one park for more than forty eight (48) 267 continuous hours in any thirty (30) day period. 268 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT f. The youth group shall comply with all applicable ordinances and park 269 regulations. 270 g. No more than sixty (60) people shall be allowed to camp at one time. 271 B. The Public Services Department Director shall issue rules and regulations for the use of 272 parks and parking lot areas for camping and parking of vehicles. Said rules shall specify in which 273 parks camping will be allowed by permit only, wherein the location camping may be allowed 274 and restrict activities of campers with regard to noise, fires, attaching structures to the ground, 275 and specifying qualifications for security personnel. 276 SECTION 4. That Sections 2.10.100, 2.10.110, and 2.10.120 of the Salt Lake City Code, 277 relating to disposition of unclaimed property, are hereby amended as follows: 278 2.10.100: DEFINITIONS: 279 LOST OR MISLAID PROPERTY: 280 A. Any property that comes into the possession of a Salt Lake City employee in their capacity of 281 as a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law enforcement agency: 282 1. That is not claimed by anyone who is identified as the owner of the property; or 283 2. For which no owner or interest holder can be found after a reasonable and diligent 284 search; 285 B. Includes any property received by Salt Lake City employees in their capacity as a peace 286 officer or law enforcement agency from a person claiming to have found the property; and 287 C. Does not include property seized by Salt Lake City employees in their capacity as a peace 288 officer or law enforcement agency pursuant to title 24, forfeiture and disposition of property act, 289 Utah state code. 290 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT PROPERTY HELD AS EVIDENCE: Any property received in evidence by a court submitted by 291 a city agency. 292 PUBLIC INTEREST USE: Use by a governmental agency as approved by the city council as 293 provided in section 2.10.150 of this chapter; or use by a bona fide charity registered with the 294 state of Utah as approved by the city council. 295 UNCLAIMED PROPERTY: Tangible and intangible property that comes into possession of a 296 Salt Lake City employees employee in their capacity as a peace officer or a Salt Lake City law 297 enforcement agency, through circumstances not involving criminal procedures in which the 298 owner is either unknown or unavailable to take possession of said property. 299 2.10.110: DISPOSITION OF LOST OR MISLAID PROPERTY: 300 Lost or mislaid property shall be disposed of in accordance with Utah code chapter 77-24a 77-301 11d as amended, or its successor statute. 302 2.10.120: DISPOSITION OF FOUND UNCLAIMED PROPERTY TO FINDER: 303 Unclaimed property, which has been surrendered to the city by one who found the property and 304 for which no owner has been identified, shall be released to the finder on the following 305 conditions: 306 A. There has expired not less than thirty (30) calendar days from date of surrender to the city; 307 B. The finder signs a statement containing: 308 1. An explanation as to how the property came into the finder's possession, including the 309 time, date and place, 310 2. A statement that the finder does not know who owns the property, 311 3. A statement that, to the finder's knowledge, the property was not stolen, 312 4. A statement that the finder's possession of the property is lawful, 313 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 5. Such other information known to the finder that may lead to an identification of the 314 owner, and 315 6. Other information the department receiving the property may request that will reasonably 316 lead to discovering the true owner; 317 C. The true owner has not been determined from information provided by the finder or known 318 to the city from other sources, after reasonable efforts by the city; 319 D. The intent to dispose of property has been advertised by the procedure set forth in 320 section 2.10.130 of this chapter, the finder has paid a proportional share of the costs of 321 advertising and storage, and eight (8) days have elapsed from the date of publication and posting 322 of the notice. 323 No city employee may claim or receive unclaimed property as a finder. 324 Unclaimed property shall be disposed of in accordance with Utah code chapter 77-11d as 325 amended, or its successor statute. 326 SECTION 5. That Section 14.20.100 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to loitering on 327 a sidewalk, is hereby amended as follows: 328 14.20.100: RESERVED. LOITERING ON SIDEWALK 329 It is unlawful for any person to remain standing, lying or sitting on any sidewalk for a longer 330 period than two (2) minutes, in such manner as to obstruct the free passage of pedestrians 331 thereon, or wilfully to remain standing, lying or sitting thereon in said manner for more than one 332 minute after being requested to move by any police officer, or wilfully to remain on any 333 sidewalk in such manner as to obstruct the free passage of any person or vehicle into or out of 334 any property abutting upon said sidewalk or any property having access to such sidewalk. 335 LEGISLATIVE DRAFT SECTION 6. That Section 12.76.090 of the Salt Lake City Code, relating to obstruction 336 of sidewalks, is hereby amended as follows: 337 12.76.090: RESERVED. PEDESTRIANS OBSTRUCTING SIDEWALKS PROHIBITED 338 Pedestrians shall not obstruct or prevent the free use of sidewalks or crosswalks by other 339 pedestrians. 340 SECTION 7. Effective Date. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon the 341 date of its first publication. 342 Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _____ day of ______________, 343 2026. 344 ______________________________ 345 CHAIRPERSON 346 ATTEST: 347 348 ________________________________ 349 CITY RECORDER 350 351 Transmitted to Mayor on 352 _______________________. 353 354 Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 355 356 ______________________________ 357 MAYOR 358 Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Sara Montoya, Senior City Attorney LEGISLATIVE DRAFT 359 _______________________________ 360 CITY RECORDER 361 362 363 (SEAL) 364 365 366 367 Bill No. _________ of 2026. 368 Published: ___________________. 369 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 02/23/2026 Date Sent to Council: 02/25/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Amann, Grant E-mail grant.amann@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 02/23/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 02/25/2026 Subject: General Plan and Zoning Map Amendment - Approx. 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S. 800 E., and 775 E. 400 S. Additional Staff Contact:Presenters/Staff Table Grant Amann Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: At its November 12, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of transmitting a recommendation of approval that the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) amend the Zoning Map, and recommended that the City Council deny the application to amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing Required Public Process The Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will hold a work session and a public hearing and make the final decision on the petition. I have attached a Public Hearing Notice sheet which will need to be sent out prior to the public hearing. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL RECOMMENDATION: PLNPCM2025-00660 – Deny the Central Community master plan as recommended by Planning Commission. PLNPCM2025-00641 – Approve the zoning map amendment request for the properties located at 346 S. 800 E, 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E. from RMF-35 to MU-5 as recommended by Planning Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Sean Thompson, representing the property owner, Hardage Hospitality, is requesting approval from Salt Lake City to amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map designations and zoning map for the following properties: 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S 800 E, and 775 E. 400 S. The second request only impacts 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E. The applicant is seeking the amendments to enable the construction of a mixed-use building encompassing 109 total residential units and ground floor commercial space. The building will also offer multi-bedroom units, including 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom units, if approved. The request must adhere to the Community Benefit standards outlined in 21A.50.050. Both requests went to Planning Commission on November 11, 2025. The Planning Commission recommended denial for the Central Community Plan Future Land Use Map amendment and approval for the Zoning Map amendment. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: The proposed changes includes 2 petitions. REQUEST 1: Central Community Future Land Use Map The subject properties are currently identified as “Medium Density Transit Oriented Development (10-50 dwelling units/acre)” and “Medium Density Residential (15-30 dwelling units/acre)”. The plan amendment seeks to change the General Plan Future Land Use Map designation of all the properties to High Density Transit Oriented Development. The existing uses are 1 single-story commercial building and 3 residential buildings. The subject properties are located in the boundaries of the Central Community Plan area where a variety of medium density housing types and a mix of neighborhood serving uses are appropriate. The subject properties are located in the Bryant neighborhood, which is characterized by diverse architectural styles and a wide variety of land uses, with a strong commercial presence along 400 South. This request would maintain consistency between the Future Land Use Map and the desired units per acre. The case number for request 1 is PLNPCM2025-00660. REQUEST 2: Zoning Map Amendment The second proposal is to rezone 3 of the 5 properties from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Residential Multi- Family) to MU-5 (Mixed-Use 5) District. The MU-5 district allows for greater density, height and a wider range of uses than permitted in the RMF-35 zoning district. If the zoning map amendment is approved, the applicant intends to apply for a lot consolidation to combine the subject properties and construct a mixed- use multi-family and storefront development consisting of approximately 109 residential units and approximately 2,590 square feet of publicly accessible retail space. The applicant is proposing to meet the requirements of the Community Benefit, Tenant Displacement, and Unit Replacement standards located in Section 21A.50.050 of the Zoning Ordinance. The case number for request 2 is PLNPCM2025-00641. Existing Zoning Map Existing Future Land Use Map COUNCIL CONSIDERATIONS: The proposed amendments must meet the consideration factors outlined in Chapters 19 and 21A of the Salt Lake City Code. Included in these factors are compliance with citywide policies, goals, and applicable plans. The applicant must indicate the project’s compliance with efforts by the city to mitigate tenant displacement and unit demolition, along with the proportionality of the community benefit proposed by the petitioner and the increase in the development potential of the site. Section 19.06 of the City Code outlines the process for general plans and amendments. Section 19.06.070 lists the factors to consider for amendments to the general plan, and a complete analysis of those standards is found in Attachment E of the Staff Report. A decision to amend a plan is ultimately up to the discretion of the City Council. The proposed community benefit is intended to provide housing that aligns with the community needs and the applicable general plan by increasing the number of units on the land from 5 units to 109 units. Of these 109 units, 24% are two-, three-, and four-bedroom units. The development also exceeds the city’s commercial frontage requirements, providing 2,590 square feet of active ground -floor commercial space along 400 South, designed to serve both residents and the broader community. Details regarding the community benefit requirements, tenant relocation assistance and unit replacement will need to be finalized as part of the development agreement, but have been deemed sufficient to advance to a public hearing. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification – On May 10th, 2025, notice of the proposal was mailed to all property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the property. The East Bench Community Council a was sent the 45- day required notice for recognized community organizations. Staff and the applicant attended the August 14, 2025, community council meeting. An online open house has been posted on the Planning Division’s website since July 2025. • Planning Commission Meeting – The petition was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on November 12, 2025. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval for the request, with the following conditions of approval: 1) Council review the components of Thriving in Place to ensure they are all represented in the potential rezone. 2) The following provisions be incorporated into a development agreement for the zoning map amendment: a. Each demolished residential dwelling unit shall be replaced in accordance with 21A.50.050.E. b. The developer shall provide tenant relocation assistance to tenants displaced by the demolition of the residential dwelling units on the subject properties as specified in subsection 21A.50.050.D. The full public meeting can be viewed using this link. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of November 12, 2025 b) PC Minutes of November 12, 2025 c) PC Staff Report of November 12, 2025 EXHIBITS: 1. Project Chronology 2. Notice of City Council Public Hearing 3. Original Petition 4. Mailing List 5. Ordinance This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petitions: PLNPCM2025-00641 – Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2025-00660 – General Plan Amendment PLNPCM2025-00856 – Design Review ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- July 2, 2025 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment, General Plan Amendment reviewed for pre-screen. July 16, 2025 Application for a Zoning Map Amendment was accepted. July 16, 2025 Petitions PLNPCM2025-00641 and PLNPCM2025-00660 were assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. July 17, 2025 Notice was sent to the East Bench Community Council Recognized Community Organization (RCO) informing them of the petition. Early notification of the project was also sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the proposal. The proposal was posted for an online open house. The proposal can still be viewed online. July 17, 2025 An Early Notification sign was posted on the properties by the applicant. August 14, 2025 The applicant presented their proposal at the East Central City Community Council meeting. August 28, 2025 Application for a Design Review was accepted. September 18, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-00856 was assigned to Grant Amann, Principal Planner, for staff analysis and processing. October 8, 2025 The MU zoning consolidation went into effect. The changed the existing zoning of the subject property, and the applicant’s request from TSA- UN-T to MU-5. October 29, 2025 Planning Staff posted notices on City and State websites and sent notices via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting. Public hearing notices were mailed. October 29, 2025 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. November 1, 2025 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property by the applicant. November 1, 2025 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. November 6, 2025 Planning Commission Staff Report was posted. November 12, 2025 Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the proposed map amendment. November 21, 2025 Requested Final Draft of Ordinance from Attorney’s Office February 2, 2026 Final Draft of Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petitions PLNPCM2025-00660, PLNPCM2025-00641, and PLNPCM2025-00856. Sean Thompson, representing the property owner Hardage Hospitality, is requesting approval from the City to amend the zoning map and the Central Community Future Land Use Map designations of the following properties: 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S 800 E, and 775 E. 400 S. In addition to the requested amendments, the applicant is seeking Design Review approval to exceed the maximum building façade length of 200’. The subject properties contain existing 3 existing residential buildings, including 7 apartment units. The proposed rezone is intended to allow for a portion of a 109-unit residential multi-family apartment development, which includes 2- ,3-, and 4- bedroom units. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at 801.535.7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Grant Amann at 801-535-6171 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by e-mail at grant.amann@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at https://www.slc.gov/planning/2025/07/08/openhouse2025-00558/ . The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 East Properties Rezone Zoning Amendment CONTENT • Purpose and Justification • Future Development • Current Zoning Map • Community Benefit • Data Collection • Tenant Displacement • Demolish Unit Replacement November 12, 2025 Page 28 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 370 S 800 E Purpose and Justification November 12, 2025 Page 29 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Purpose for the Amendment The primary purpose of this zoning amendment is to facilitate significant housing production in direct response to Salt Lake City's acute housing crisis. As outlined in Housing SLC, the city must entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023-2027 to address both projected population growth and existing housing deficits. This project transforms 7 existing substandard units into 109 modern, code-compliant residential units—representing a 15-fold increase in housing capacity on underutilized urban land. This requests a zoning map amendment for parcels 16-05-303-015, 16-05-303-016, and 16-05-303-017 from RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family, 35' Maximum Height) to MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories). This amendment will enable the redevelopment of underutilized properties containing deteriorated residential structures and a vacant, fire-damaged commercial building into a vibrant mixed-use development that directly advances Salt Lake City's housing and economic development objectives. AREA OF REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE FIG. 1 - CURRENT ZONING MAP AND AREA OF REQUESTED CHANGE RMF-35 to MU-5 TSA-UN-T to MU-5 November 12, 2025 Page 30 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Purpose for the Amendment Addressing Critical Housing Shortage The primary purpose of this zoning amendment is to facilitate significant housing production in direct response to Salt Lake City's acute housing crisis. As outlined in Housing SLC, the city must entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023-2027 to address both projected population growth and existing housing deficits. This project transforms 7 existing substandard units into 109 modern, code-compliant residential units—representing a 15-fold increase in housing capacity on underutilized urban land. Creating Mixed-Use Urban Environment The MU-5 zoning designation will enable a true mixed-use development featuring approximately 3,460 square feet of ground- floor commercial space alongside diverse residential options. This mixed-use approach eliminates the current vacant commercial eyesore while creating space for multiple local businesses, charitable organizations, and community services that enhance neighborhood walkability and economic vitality. Maximizing Transit-Adjacent Development Located just 600 feet from two TRAX stops with exceptional walkability scores (80s-90s), this site represents an ideal opportunity for transit-oriented development. The MU-5 zoning supports appropriate density and mixed-use character that reduces car dependency, supports public transit investment, and promotes sustainable urban growth patterns. FIG. 2 - SALT LAKE CITY / PLANNING DIVISION, IMAGE CORTESY OF WWW.SLC.GOV/PLANNING November 12, 2025 Page 31 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Justification for the Amendment 1. Alignment with City Planning Objectives Housing SLC Implementation: In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council voted to adopt Housing SLC, a five-year plan that is to “serve as a guiding document for the City over the next five years, providing a framework for action across City Departments and Divisions” (Housing SLC, page 58). Goal 1 of this plan is to entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023 and 2027. The population of Salt Lake City is projected to increase by 6,000 during the five-year period of the Plan, which will require an additional 3,000 new housing units on top of the existing deficit (Housing SLC, page 9). The problem is that there is very limited buildable land on which these additional units can be placed within the City. Many parts of the city are unable to be developed due to the presence of wetlands and foothills. Areas in proximity to the Salt Lake City International Airport cannot be built on due to Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Most of the developable land has already been built on. We are out of land to continue growing outward. The solution is greater density - providing more housing on the existing developable land. New developments in Salt Lake City are required to select at least five Moderate Income Housing Plan (MIHP) strategies that will be incorporated into the project. Projects must utilize at least six strategies in order to be eligible for state funding. Four of the strategies have to do with rezoning or amending regulations in order to allow for higher density and more multifamily residential dwellings (Strategies A, F, G, and W; Housing SLC, pages 28-29). The Housing SLC plan states that “The crisis we are currently facing has been decades in the making and extends beyond the municipal boundaries of the city, reaching across the county, the state, and the nation. It will take collaboration across governmental, non-profit, community, and private partners to work through this housing crisis.” That includes us. That includes you. The proposed rezoning and subsequent project helps meet these City goals. Currently, these lots host 7 units (4 one-bed, 1 two-bed, 1 three-bed, and 1 four-bed) while the proposed project would host 109 units (22 studio, 61 one-bed, 22 two-bed, 3 three-bed, and 1 four-bed). Mixed-Use Development Support: The project exemplifies the mixed-use, walkable development promoted throughout Salt Lake City's planning documents, creating an integrated live-work-shop environment that reduces transportation demand and supports local economic activity. FIG. 3 - GRAPH OF POPULATION AND PROJECTED POPULATION, HOUSING SLC (LEFT), GRAPH OF EXISTING VS PROPOSED UNITS ON PROJECT AREA LOTS (RIGHT) 15x Increase in Housing 8x Increase in Family Units November 12, 2025 Page 32 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone Justification for the Amendment 2. Zoning Consistency and Logical Planning: The block in question is already predominantly zoned TSA- UN-T (~93%). Rezoning the remaining RMF-35 parcels to MU-5 will establish a consistent zoning pattern, reduce regulatory complexity, and support coherent urban planning. The initial request was for TSA-UN-T; however, during the application review, the zoning designation was changed to MU-5. The current request aligns with that designation and seeks to formally rezone the parcels to MU-5. 3. Optimal Land Use and Site Conditions: Underutilized Property Transformation: The current site contains deteriorated structures that cannot economically be renovated to meet current building codes and livability standards. The existing 4-plex, duplex, and single-family home are in poor condition, while the commercial space has been vacant and fire-damaged. Redevelopment represents the highest and best use of this prime urban location. Infrastructure Readiness: The development team is actively coordinating with Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department and utility consultants to evaluate infrastructure capacity needed to support the proposed project. Ongoing discussions indicate that the necessary systems can be planned to accommodate the development. In addition, a Traffic Impact Study has been prepared and is currently under review. Preliminary coordination with UDOT suggests that transportation impacts can be addressed, particularly given the site’s strong transit access and walkability. FIG. 4 - PORTION OF ZONING MAP, IMAGE COURTESY OF SLC FIG. 5 - PROPERTY VIEW FROM TRAX, IMAGE COURTESY OF GOOGLE MAPS November 12, 2025 Page 33 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone Justification for the Amendment 4. Enhanced Public Safety and Emergency Access Fire Department Coordination: The project design has been developed in consultation with Salt Lake City Fire Department to ensure optimal emergency access. Current site constraints, including narrow streets and overhead power lines, limit emergency vehicle access under existing zoning. The MU-5 development enables unified site planning that significantly improves fire and emergency access compared to the fragmented current configuration. Modern Safety Standards: New construction will meet all current building and fire safety codes, replacing aged structures with modern safety systems and accessibility features. Zoning Setback Buildable Area AERIAL FIRE ACCESS WIDTH REQUIREMENT THE MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH IS 26’, 800 E IS 24’ WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FIRE CODE REQUIREMENT. A AERIAL FIRE ACCESS OBSTRUCTION OVERHEAD UTILITY AND POWER LINES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED OVER AERIAL FIRE ACCESS ROAD OR BUILDING. CAERIAL FIRE ACCESS PROXIMITY TO BLDG. REQUIRED TO BE NOT LESS THAN 15’ AND NOT GREATER THAN 30’ FROM BUILDING. B 400 S 80 0 E LINDEN AVE 24' - 0" 11% of Building Perimeter 26 ' . M i n . Buildable Area 32' 15% of Building Perimeter Construction with Proposed Rezoning Rezone allows for SLCFD preferred approach, reduces asphalt and maximizes housing potential A B C Max.Allowable height 35’ Maximum allowable height 50’ Construction with Added Fire Lane Fire lane between zones results in additional asphalt and reduced housing A B C Max.Allowable height 35’ Maximum allowable height 50’ A B C Construction with Current Zoning SLCFD will not allow roofs at multiple heights FIG. 6 - 400 S AND LINDEN AVE. FIRE AERIAL ACCESS ANALYSIS November 12, 2025 Page 34 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone Justification for the Amendment Due to physical site constraints, aerial fire access from 800 East is not feasible. The road width, which cannot be increased, and presence of high voltage power lines prevent compliance with Salt Lake City Fire Department standards for aerial operations. Per Salt Lake City Code, the Fire Department requires a minimum of 25% of the building perimeter to be aerial apparatus accessible in order to ensure life safety and fire protection. Given the limitations along 800 East, the only viable way to meet this requirement is to provide aerial access along Linden Avenue and 400 South, which offer sufficient clearance, appropriate setbacks, and operational space for fire equipment. The requested zone change to MU-5 supports this layout by enabling a development form that can meet fire access requirements while also contributing to the city’s goals for higher-density, transit-oriented design. 5. Economic and Community Development Substantial Private Investment: The project represents significant private investment in neighborhood infrastructure and housing stock, generating construction employment and ongoing economic activity. Local Business Support: The 3,460 square feet of commercial space will accommodate multiple local businesses, professional services, and potentially charitable organizations, creating local employment and serving daily needs of residents and the surrounding community. Community-Endorsed Development: Local community area representatives have provided positive feedback on the project's approach to addressing vacant properties and increasing family housing options. 6. Family Housing Production Critical Family Unit Shortage: The project increases family-sized units (2-4 bedrooms) from 3 existing to 26 proposed— an eight-fold increase that directly addresses the shortage of family housing in Salt Lake City's urban core. The unit mix specifically responds to diverse household needs identified in the General Plan: • 22 studio units for workforce housing • 61 one-bedroom units for diverse household types • 22 two-bedroom units for small families • 3 three-bedroom units for larger families • 1 four-bedroom unit for larger families November 12, 2025 Page 35 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone Justification for the Amendment 7. Environmental and Transportation Benefits Urban Infill Development: The project represents responsible urban infill that maximizes existing infrastructure rather than encouraging sprawling greenfield development. Reduced Transportation Demand: The combination of transit access, high walkability, and integrated commercial space minimizes vehicle trips per unit, supporting the city's sustainability and transportation efficiency goals. FIG. 8 - TRAX STOP NEAR PROPERTY, IMAGE COURTESY OF SLC 8. Compatibility with Surrounding Neighborhood Character Because the adjacent properties to the South and West are already zoned MU-5, the proposed amendment will not introduce incompatible land uses or disrupt the existing development pattern. Instead, it will promote continuity in building scale, architectural design, and streetscape character, thereby enhancing neighborhood cohesion. To ensure a sensitive and gradual transition from the MU-5 zone to the adjacent RMF-35 zone north of Linden Avenue, the proposed development will comply with the angular plane requirements outlined in Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.37.050. Specifically, a 45-degree angular plane measured from the shared property lines provides a clear framework for scaling down from higher-density, high-rise forms to lower-scale residential development. This design approach mitigates potential impacts on neighboring properties and supports a compatible urban form that respects the established residential context. FIG. 7 - PROPOSED HEIGHT TRANSITION 45.00° Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e Setback 10'107' Stepback Building157' Setback 10' Angular Plane from (E) Property Building Context and Facade Length Diagram Elevation 0 8'32'16' FIG. 9 - 800 EAST FACADE TSA-UN-T November 12, 2025 Page 36 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Justification for the Amendment 9. Solar Shading Study: The comprehensive solar shading study demonstrates that the proposed 4-story mixed-use building at 370 S 800 E will not create adverse solar access impacts on neighboring properties. Key findings include: Contained Shadow Patterns: Shadows fall predominantly within the development site boundaries and on public street areas, Seasonal Stability: Both equinox and winter solstice conditions show consistent pattern of contained shadow impact, Time-of-Day Analysis: Morning and afternoon peak periods demonstrate minimal extension of shadows onto neighboring private properties. Responsible Building Design: Appropriate Scale: 4-story height balances density objectives with neighborhood compatibility, Strategic Orientation: Building placement and design minimize shadow extension during critical daylight hours, Transition Elements: Angular plane compliance and height stepping provide appropriate transitions to adjacent properties. Regulatory and Community Compatibility: Standards Compliance: Project meets all MU-5 zoning requirements for height, setbacks, and building relationships. Urban Context: Shadow patterns appropriate for established urban mixed-use area with existing infrastructure and development. Net Community Benefit: Minimal shadow impact is significantly outweighed by housing production, commercial activation, and neighborhood improvement benefits. The solar study confirms that this well-designed mixed-use development will integrate successfully into the neighborhood fabric while preserving appropriate solar access for surrounding properties. The building's scale, orientation, and positioning demonstrate careful consideration of neighboring properties' solar access needs while achieving important community housing and economic development objectives. FIG. 10 - EQUINOX - 9AM FIG. 12 - WINTER SOLSTICE - 9AM FIG. 11 - EQUINOX - 3PM FIG. 13 - WINTER SOLSTICE - 3PM November 12, 2025 Page 37 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Future Development November 12, 2025 Page 38 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties FIG. 14 - ALLOWABLE VOLUME Future Development 1. Proposed Use of the Property: Upon approval of the requested Zoning Map Amendment, the affected property is intended for development as a five-story structure designed and constructed in accordance with MU-5 zoning requirements. The development will feature active ground-floor uses, including commercial space, and amenity and support spaces to engage the street scape and contribute to a vibrant pedestrian environment. Parking will be incorporated internally within the structure to minimize its visual impact and support transit-oriented goals. Residential units will occupy floors one through five, providing a mix of housing types from studio to three bedroom units, consistent with the City’s goals for increased density and walkability in transit station areas. (Refer to Floor Plans) 2. Proposed Density of the Property: The current zoning designation, RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family), permits a building height of up to 55 feet. The proposed MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories) zoning allows for increased residential density and a maximum building height of up to 50 feet, subject to compliance with design and compatibility standards outlined in the Salt Lake City Code. Approval of this zone change would allow for the addition of approximately 24 residential units (studios, 1bed, 2bed, 3bed and 4bed) beyond what is currently permitted under RMF-35. This increase in density supports a more efficient use of the land in a transit-adjacent location and enables the development of a four-story, mixed-use building. The proposed density and height are compatible with the surrounding context and further the City’s goals for walkable, transit-oriented, and higher-intensity urban neighborhoods. MU-5 ALLOWABLE VOLUME TSA-UN-T ALLOWABLE VOLUME RMF-35 ALLOWABLE VOLUME November 12, 2025 Page 39 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Future Development 3. Scale of the Development: The proposed development will consist of a five-story, mixed-use building that reflects the scale and character encouraged in the MU-5 zoning district. The structure will reach a height of approximately 55 feet to the roof, consistent with the maximum height allowed under the MU-5 zone and in keeping with surrounding buildings within the block, the majority of which are already recently zoned MU-5. Along Linden Avenue, the building will incorporate a 45-degree angular plane from the shared property lines, as required by Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.37.050, to provide a visually appropriate step-down in height and massing. This approach minimizes visual impact and supports a cohesive streetscape. In terms of footprint and form, the building will occupy the northern portion of the block, with internalized parking and active ground-floor uses that contribute to the pedestrian environment. The overall scale is compatible with the area’s evolving urban context and aligns with the City’s goals for higher-density, transit-oriented development. 4. Timing of the Development: The project will proceed to planning immediately upon approval of the requested Zoning Map Amendment. 5. Impact to Existing land uses and Occupants: At a prominent corner of the block is a vacant commercial building, most recently a Pizza Hut that was damaged by a transient-set fire. The subject property also features a mix of older, non- historical structures: a single-family home, a duplex, and a four-plex. These existing uses represent a fragmented and underutilized condition that does not align with the area’s evolving urban character or its potential for transit-oriented, mixed-use redevelopment. The buildings on-site are not historically significant, and offer limited contribution to the surrounding urban fabric or pedestrian experience. The vacancy and visible decline of the site diminish the vitality of the neighborhood, which is predominantly recently zoned MU-5 and currently experiencing significant reinvestment and redevelopment activity. Rents received on said properties do not support renovation of said buildings. The requested zone change would result in a financially viable project to redevelop all of the parcels, which will facilitate a cohesive, higher-density redevelopment that supports Salt Lake City’s vision for Transit Station Areas. The proposed mixed-use project will introduce active commercial uses, live/work spaces, and new housing options that enhance walkability, support transit ridership, and contribute to the long-term vibrancy and resilience of the neighborhood. FIG. 14 - CURRENT VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING November 12, 2025 Page 40 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties ¼ Mi.½ Mi. Retail Medical Businesses Site Grocery Restaurants Transit Vicinity Map This graphic illustrates businesses within walking distance of the 800 E Properties. Redevelopment of the site and the addition of units will increase pedestrain traffic in the area. November 12, 2025 Page 41 of 160 Site Plan 0 8'32'16' N 11’ - 5 ¾” 12’ - 4 ¼”103’ - 9 ¾”157’ - 0 ¼” 18’-1 ¾“ 17’ - 11 ¼” 10’ - 0”27’ - 5” Aerial Access Road WidthSet Back 22’ 2 ½” Existing Road WidthProximity 5’ 2 ½” 316’ - 8 ¼” 10 7 ’ - 2 ¾ ” Le s s t h a n 1 4 % o f B u i l d i n g P e r i m e t e r 54’ - 11 ¾” 293’ - 3 ¾ ” M a x D i a g o n a l D i m e n s i o n (Dista n c e b e t w e e n A c c e s s R o a d s M i n . 1 4 6 ’ ½ ” ) Less than 2% of Perimeter Less than 7% of Perimeter 71 ’ - 1 0 ” 32 ’ - 8 ½ ” 24 ’ - 0 ” Le s s t h a n 9 % o f B u i l d i n g P e r i m e t e r Building Perimeter is 798’ 7 ¼” 5 Stories (over 30’, less than 60’) 110 Residential Units Required Fire Sprinkler System NFPA-13 AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD □ Access to one entire side of the building - D105.3 □ Road width is over 26’ - D105.2 □ The road curb is 18’ - 1 ¾” from the building - D105.3 40 0 S Li n d e n A v e n u e 800 E AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD □ Access to one entire side of the building - D105.3 □ Road width is over 26’ - D105.2 □ The road curb is 23’ - 1 ¾” from the building - D105.3 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length Existing Primary Feed Overhead Power Line Distance Between Access Roads is Over 139’ Proximity Exceeds Maximum Distance from Building Road Width Does Not Meet Fire Apparatus Access Road Requirements Existing Overhead Utility To be Buried or Relocated Fi r e L i n e , N O P A R K I N G 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 42 of 160 UP DN UP 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 205 21222425 26272829 23 3132 30333435 363738 40 41 42 43 44 53 54 55 5657 58 60 6159 62 63 64 65 66 67 6850 51 5247 48 4945 46 39 8 14 1414 3 3 2 2 12 Lobby Plan Key 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Stair Elevators Bike Storage Tenant Amenity Trash/Recycling Chutes Dumpsters Parking Garage Clubhouse Leasing/Management Mail & Package Room Mechanical/Electrical Roof Deck Tenant Storage Transformer Legend Studio...........................497 SF 1 Bedroom Junior........689 SF 1 Bedroom...................764 SF 2 Bedroom..................1025 SF Live/Work Loft Commercial 3 Bedroom..................1469 SF Circulation Indoor Amenity Parking Vertical Circulation Storage Service/Mechanical Building Plans - Below Grade 0 5'20'10' N 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 43 of 160 DN UP DN UP Ramp Down Parking Garage Entry Drive Fi r e L a n e Parking Garage Entry Drive 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 95 10 11 12 15 14 1318 17 1621 20 19 11 1 10 4 3 3 1 7 12 12 2 2 8 15 12 12 Lease Space Gym Space Lobby Plan Key 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Stair Elevators Bike Storage Tenant Amenity Trash/Recycling Chutes Dumpsters Parking Garage Clubhouse Leasing/Management Mail & Package Room Mechanical/Electrical Roof Deck Tenant Storage Transformer Legend Studio...........................497 SF 1 Bedroom Junior........689 SF 1 Bedroom...................764 SF 2 Bedroom..................1025 SF 4 Bedroom..................1760 SF Commercial 3 Bedroom..................1469 SF Circulation Indoor Amenity Parking Vertical Circulation Storage Service/Mechanical Building Plans - Level 1 0 5'20'10' N 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 44 of 160 DN UP UP DN 9 3 3 2 5 5 2 13 6 12 12 Lobby Plan Key 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Stair Elevators Bike Storage Tenant Amenity Trash/Recycling Chutes Dumpsters Parking Garage Clubhouse Leasing/Management Mail & Package Room Mechanical/Electrical Roof Deck Tenant Storage Transformer Legend Studio...........................497 SF 1 Bedroom Junior........689 SF 1 Bedroom...................764 SF 2 Bedroom..................1025 SF Live/Work Loft Commercial 3 Bedroom..................1469 SF Circulation Indoor Amenity Parking Vertical Circulation Storage Service/Mechanical Building Plans - Level 2 0 5'20'10' N 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 45 of 160 DN DN UP 3 3 2 5 52 6 12 12 Lobby Plan Key 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Stair Elevators Bike Storage Tenant Amenity Trash/Recycling Chutes Dumpsters Parking Garage Clubhouse Leasing/Management Mail & Package Room Mechanical/Electrical Roof Deck Tenant Storage Transformer Legend Studio...........................497 SF 1 Bedroom Junior........689 SF 1 Bedroom...................764 SF 2 Bedroom..................1025 SF Live/Work Loft Commercial 3 Bedroom..................1469 SF Circulation Indoor Amenity Parking Vertical Circulation Storage Service/Mechanical Building Plans - Levels 3 - 5 0 5'20'10' N 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 46 of 160 Roof Plan 0 5'20'10' N 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 47 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 North Elevation 2 5 10 9 6 7 9 10 4 6 5 0 5'20'10' 1 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 48 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 East Elevation 1 2 6 3 7 97 9 6 8 7 9 2 5 5 1 10 10109 7 10 0 5'20'10' 1 7 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 49 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 South Elevation 1 2 5 10 10 9 78 5 9 10 9 5 6 0 5'20'10' 74 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 50 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 West Elevation 4 6 6 6 7 9 7 7 9 2 5 5 9 1 10 8 1 9 5 10 4 0 5'20'10' 2 5 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 51 of 160 South View from Across 8th East 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 52 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Current Zoning Map November 12, 2025 Page 53 of 160 1 21 - 0 9 5 20 2 2 - 0 8 - 3 1 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties RECORD OF SURVEY FOR THE PARCELS IN QUESTION. Purpose for the Amendment The purpose of this requested zoning map amendment is to establish a consistent zoning designation across the block, which is currently 94% zoned MU-5. This change will enhance fire and emergency access and support higher-density development of family-friendly housing on the northern portion of the properties owned by Hardage Hospitality. Specifically, this request seeks to rezone the following parcels: 16-05-303-015, 16-05-303-016 & 16-05-303-017. From RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family, 35 units/acre) to MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories). November 12, 2025 Page 54 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit November 12, 2025 Page 55 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit The development at 800 East Properties provides substantial community benefits as required by Section 21A.50.050.C, delivering housing that aligns with community needs and commercial space for local businesses that would not otherwise be provided without the zoning amendment. Section 21A.50.050.C.1.a - Housing Aligned with Community Needs Providing housing that aligns with the current or future needs of the community as determined by the general plan. Needs could include the level of affordability in excess of the number of dwellings that exist on the site, size in terms of number of bedrooms, or availability of housing for purchase. Dramatic Increase in Housing Supply The proposal transforms underutilized residential structures and vacant commercial space into 109 residential units - a significant increase from the existing 4-5 dwelling units currently on site. This represents over a 2,000% increase in housing density, directly addressing Salt Lake City's documented housing shortage. Family-Sized Housing Mix Addressing Community Needs The project's unit distribution specifically addresses the "size in terms of number of bedrooms" criterion identified in Section 21A.50.050.C.1.a: • Studios (22 units, 20%): 445-536 SF - Entry-level housing for young professionals and students • Junior One-Bedrooms (17 units, 16%): 630-651 SF - Transitional housing for couples and small households • One-Bedrooms (44 units, 40%): 704-726 SF - Core market housing for diverse household types • Two-Bedrooms (22 units, 20%): 951-1,114 SF - Family housing accommodating children and home offices • Three-Bedrooms (3 units, 3%): 1,384 SF - True family-sized units retaining families in the urban core • Four-Bedrooms (1 unit, 1%): 1,678 SF - True family-sized unit retaining families in the urban core This diverse mix directly responds to Salt Lake City's General Plan goals for housing diversity and the documented need for family-appropriate housing along transit corridors. The inclusion of larger 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom units (24% of total) specifically addresses the shortage of family housing in urban mixed-use developments. Alignment with General Plan Objectives The housing mix supports Plan Salt Lake's objectives for: Transit-Oriented Development: 109 units directly on the 400 South/800 East corridor Housing Diversity: Units ranging from 445 SF to 1,384 SF serve multiple income levels and family types Urban Density: Efficient use of existing infrastructure while maintaining neighborhood character STUDIO UNIT (22) ONE BED UNIT (61)TWO BED UNIT (22)THREE BED UNIT (3)FOUR BED UNIT (1) 497 SF 689-764 SF 1,025 SF 1,469 SF 1,678 SF November 12, 2025 Page 56 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit Section 21A.50.050.C.1.b - Commercial Space for Local Businesses, Providing commercial space for local businesses or charitable organizations. Community-Serving Commercial Programming The project provides 2,590 SF of active commercial space specifically designed to support local businesses and address documented community needs: Public Gymnasium (1,978 SF) • Addresses overcrowding at existing area fitness facilities • Serves both residents and the broader community • Creates employment for fitness professionals and support staff • Provides accessible health infrastructure along the transit corridor Local Business Commercial Space (612 SF) • Dog Wash Station: Serves pet owners in the dense residential corridor who currently lack convenient pet care facilities • TRAX Bike Storage & Repair: Supports cyclists using public transit, encouraging multimodal transportation • Flexible space designed to accommodate other neighborhood-serving businesses Local Business Benefits These commercial uses specifically benefit local entrepreneurs by: • Providing turn-key facilities for service businesses addressing unmet community needs • Creating visible, accessible storefronts with extensive glazing and sidewalk orientation • Offering affordable commercial space in a prime transit-accessible location • Supporting business sustainability through built-in customer base (109 residential units) and transit accessibility FIG. 16 - UTA BIKE LOCKER WEBSITEFIG. 15 - ICLEAN DOG WASH FIG. 17 - LOCAL GYM November 12, 2025 Page 57 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit Section 21A.50.050.C.2.h - General Plan Policy Support The proposed community benefits align with multiple General Plan policies: • Grow Plan: Increasing density along transit corridors • Live Plan: Providing diverse housing options for different life stages • Connect Plan: Supporting multimodal transportation through bike facilities • Play Plan: Enhancing community health through fitness facilities Conclusion The 800E Properties development provides exceptional community benefits under Section 21A.50.050.C that would not be possible without the zoning amendment. The project transforms underutilized property into 110 units of diverse, family-appropriate housing while creating commercial space specifically designed to support local businesses and address documented community needs. These benefits - a 2,000%+ increase in housing supply with family-sized units and community-serving commercial space - clearly justify the requested zoning amendment and provide lasting value to the 400 South transit corridor neighborhood. November 12, 2025 Page 58 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Data Collection November 12, 2025 Page 59 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties 4 Plex - 346-348 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 4 Square Footage per Floor Unit Summary *Note: Unit B (main level) includes shared entrance, hall, and staircase to Unit A. Duplex - 350 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 2 Unit Summary Unit Est. Sq Ft Bedrooms Current Residents Bonus Rooms Rent Now Rent 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 A 500 1 1 $995 $995 $995 $675 B 800 1 1 2 finished basement bonus rooms $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $895 C 1,600 2 1 Small office $1,495 $1,495 $1,195 $1,195 D 500 1 1 $895 $895 $895 $995 Sum 3,400 5 4 $4,480 $4,480 $4,180 $3,760 Floor Sq Ft per Floor Notes Floor 1 1,444 Floor 2 1,444 Basement ~1,444 Approx. 60-70% Finished Living Space + Utility Room Sum ~4,332 Unit Est. Sq Ft Bedrooms Current Residents Notes Rent Now Rent 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 352 560 1 1 $895 $995 $995 $945 354 1,380 3 3 $1,545 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 Unfinished Basement 1,120 0 0 No residents have access to this space Sum 3,060 4 4 $2,440 $2,290 $2,290 $2,240 Data Collection November 12, 2025 Page 60 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties House - 354 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 1 Bedrooms: 4 Total People Living in Property: 5 Square Footage per Floor Rent Vacant Commercial Space - 775 E 400 S SLC, UT 84102 Current Use: Vacant Prior Occupant: Pizza Hut Square Footage: ~1,600 Sq Ft Cost to Lease Now 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 Rent $1,895 $1,895 $1,895 $1,895 Floor Sq Ft Floor 1 1,630 Floor 2 1,630 Unfinished Basement 1,090 Sum 2,720 Data Collection Now 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 Rent $0 $0 $$ November 12, 2025 Page 61 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement November 12, 2025 Page 62 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement If the petition is successful, the owner will coordinate with the planning department to ensure compliance with City Ordnance 21A.50.050.D.4. and 21A.50.050.E, Tenant Displacement Obligations and Demolished Unit Replacement. Section 19.06.070.D.4 Tenant Relocation Assistance - Applicant Proposal There are seven (7) existing units, four (4) are occupied and three (3) are vacant. All units will be demolished as part of this proposed project. The existing four (4) leases are month-to-month short-term leases. Upon project approval the applicant will provide (60) written notice to existing tenants that their leases will be terminated and notice that the applicant will provide the relocation assistance identified herein to the remaining affected tenants. The applicant will provide each tenant the following assistance as provided under Section 19.06.070.D.4.a-d subject to the following terms: a. Moving expenses based on a reasonable estimate provided by the tenant, up to a maximum of $1,500. a. To qualify for moving expenses, the tenants will be required to provide applicant estimates/quotes (10) business days prior to expenses being incurred for reimbursement. b. The applicant will reimburse moving expenses based upon the estimate provided by tenant within (10) business days of receipt of estimates. b. Application fees for the replacement housing. a. The applicant will reimburse tenant for reasonable application fees up to maximum of (20) separate applications. b. The tenants must provide applicant copies of application fees and receipts of fees paid. c. The applicants will reimburse tenant application fees (10) business days after receipt of invoices. c. A reasonable deposit that the displaced tenant would have to pay to secure replacement housing. a. The applicant will reimburse deposits up to max amount equal to current monthly rent rate of tenant. b. The tenant will provide applicant invoices and receipts of required deposits for replacement housing within (10) business days of invoices. c. The applicant will reimburse invoices within (10) business days of receipt. d. Monthly Rental Assistance payment. The rental assistance payment is based upon the difference, if any, between the cost of the currently monthly rent of the existing housing and a reasonably comparable unit. The rental payment total amount paid shall not be more than $7,200. a. The applicant will provide rental assistance payment to tenants for the difference between current rent and rent for reasonably comparable replacement housing for up to (12) months total and/or a maximum of $7,200, whichever amount is less. b. The tenant seeking rental assistance will only qualify in for reimbursement if the tenant has found a reasonably comparable unit. Comparable is defined as equal in size, number of bedrooms, baths, level of finishes, amenities available, and age of property (within 20 years). Tenants will be required to submit comparable properties applications to application to confirm they are comparable properties. c. The tenant will provide applicant with a copy of the new lease and different rent calculation to applicant within (10) business days of commencement of lease for reimbursement. d. The applicant will reimburse tenant within (10) business of receipt of new lease and rent assistance calculation. November 12, 2025 Page 63 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement Section 19.060.070.E Demolished Unit Replacement There are (7) existing units that will be demolished as part of this proposed project. The future development will be replacing the existing housing units with units having the same number of bedrooms. Additionally, the applicant will provide the following option as permitted by Section 19.06.070.E.2. 2. As allowed under the City Code, the applicant will make a payment to the city in lieu of rental restrictions on the new unit to go toward the city’s housing fund to offset the loss of naturally affordable housing. The payment will be equal to the monthly rent of the units prior to demolition times outlined in the data tables on page 32 and 33 multiplied by the number of months between the time the unit is vacated prior to demolition until a temporary certificate of occupancy for applicant’s new development is issued. November 12, 2025 Page 64 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 East Properties Design Review CONTENT • Compliance with Section 21A.59.050 • Site Plan • Existing Conditions • Project Description • Proposed Development November 12, 2025 Page 65 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Compliance with Section 21A.59.050 November 12, 2025 Page 66 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Compliance with Section 21A.59.030 A. Consistency with MU-5 Zone, Urban Design Element, and Master Plans The MU-5 (Mixed Use District 5) zone is intended to promote higher-density, mixed-use, transit-oriented development. This project advances those goals by: • Delivering 109 residential units in a mix of studios, junior one-bedrooms, one-bedrooms, two-bedrooms, three- bedrooms, and four-bedrooms (Pages 16-18). • Incorporating active, publicly accessible ground floor uses, including a gym (1,978 sf), commercial space (612 sf) clubhouse, leasing office, and lobby (Page 16). • Locating all parking within the builing (Page 15 -16), eliminating surface parking and reinforcing the pedestrian realm. • Supporting master plan and Urban Design Element goals for the 400 South/Transit Corridor by enhancing walkability, providing higher-intensity housing near transit, and activating the street frontage with retail-like functions. B. Orientation to Sidewalk • Primary Entrances: The lobby, lease spaces, and gym entries face 400 South and 800 East, directly addressing the sidewalk (Page 16). • Building Siting: The building maintains a 10’ setback, reinforcing the urban street wall (Page 7). • Parking: All parking is internalized and screened. Garage access is limited to driveways on secondary frontages, minimizing pedestrian conflicts (Pages 15-16). The two access points is a 60 % reduction of driveways compared to current state. C. Active Ground Floor & Transparency • Active Uses: The ground level includes a gym, and leasing functions, ensuring continuous activation along sidewalks (Page 16). • Transparency: Clear, non-reflective storefront glazing is used extensively along 400 South and 800 East (Pages 19- 22). • Storefront Articulation: Sign bands, transom glazing, and articulated transitions reinterpret traditional storefront design. • Outdoor Visual Connections: Amenity and landscaped open spaces at ground level provide direct visual connections to the street (Pages 23-26). D. Human-Scale Massing • Contextual Scale: The 5 story structure (59’ max height) fits the anticipated scale of MU-5 and adjacent mixed-use development. • Modulation: Stepbacks, recesses, and alternating façade planes break down massing (Pages-19-22). • Secondary Elements: Balconies, bays, horizontal courses, and window reveals enhance articulation. • Window Rhythm: Fenestration establishes a solid-to-void ratio that reflects desired urban patterns (Pages-19-22). November 12, 2025 Page 67 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties E. Large Building Masses (>200’) • Vertical Breaks: Façade modulation occurs through inset balconies and material shifts (Pages-19-22). • Material Changes: The exterior employs architectural metal, EIFS, brick veneer, and wood accents materials in a manner to suggest different buildings if not in fact separate masses (Pages-19-22). • Massing Changes: The east and west wings create differentiated volumes. • Active Uses at Grade: More than 80% of ground floor frontage includes active, publicly accessible uses (Page 16). • Stepbacks: Upper levels step back 10’ from the streetwall, creating a defined pedestrian-scaled base (Pages-19-22). F. Privately-Owned Public Spaces The project provides outdoor gathering spaces along 400 South and 800 East (Page 7), including: • Seating areas for residents and visitors. • Street trees and landscaping offering shade, visual interest and a softening of the hardscape. • Public art opportunities integrated into plazas. • Outdoor connection to amenity patios and community spaces. G. Building Height & Human Scale • Stepbacks: Stepbacks are used above the base to maintain human scale. • Minimizing Impacts: Building modulation and orientation reduce shadow and wind impacts; taller portions are set back from property edges. • Roofline & Cornice: Rooflines are articulated with parapets, material changes, and mechanical screening (Pages-19- 22) • Roof Deck: A roof amenity deck provides outdoor living space and supports sustainability (Page 14). H. Parking & Circulation • All parking is internal and screened from pedestrian view(Pages 15-16). • Driveway entries are minimized to protect sidewalks. • Direct pedestrian connections link entries to sidewalks and transit stops (Page 7). I. Screening of Service Areas Trash, recycling, transformers and mechanical rooms are located within the building and accessed via service drives (Z- 006). All equipment is screened with materials consistent with the façade (Pages-19-22). November 12, 2025 Page 68 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties J. Signage • Signage zones will be integrated into storefront bands (Page 19). • Blade signage opportunities are provided at primary corners. • Signage locations are coordinated with lighting and landscaping. K. Lighting • Pedestrian-scale lighting will be installed per the Salt Lake City Lighting Master Plan. • Building and plaza lighting is designed for comfort, safety, and dark sky compliance. • Accent lighting highlights building entries and key design features. L. Streetscape Improvements Street Trees: New trees will be planted along both 400 South and 800 East at approx. 30’ intervals, per city forestry guidelines (Page 7). Hardscape: • Durable, ADA-accessible materials differentiate public vs. private spaces. • High-SRI paving minimizes heat island effects. • Landscape-integrated seating supports universal accessibility. Conclusion The Viv – MU-5 has been designed to fully comply with the intent and requirements of Salt Lake City Code §21A.59.050. The project delivers a transit-oriented, pedestrian-scaled, mixed-use development that strengthens the urban edge of 400 South and 800 East, enhances public realm conditions, and provides high-quality housing supported by active ground floor uses. November 12, 2025 Page 69 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Site Plan November 12, 2025 Page 70 of 160 Fi r e L a n e S00o14'08"W 170.29' Line of Building Above Raised Planters -Native Plants -Drip Irrigation Building Line of Building Above 33' - 3 3/4"22' - 4 1/4"102' - 3 1/2" Drive Width 24' - 0"91' - 1 1/4" Dr i v e W i d t h 27 ' - 0 " Transforme 13' - 9" 13 ' - 1 " Sidewalk Parking Strip 800 East Si d e w a l k 40 0 Se t b a c k 3' - 6 " Se t b a c k 6' - 7 1 / 2 " Setback 6' - 8 3/4" Setback 10' - 1 1/4" Se t b a c k 12 ' - 1 1 / 4 " Setback 11' - 5" Se t b a c k 1' - 8 1 / 2 " Setback 10' - 0 3/4" 275' - 4 3/4" 11 0 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 12 0 ' - 8 " Ne a r e s t D w e l l i n g Nearest Dwelling Pool Deck, Level 2 Unit Deck 48 SF, Typ. Unit Deck 48 SF, Typ. Unit Deck Railing, 42" Typ. Li n d e n A v e n u e Clear Sight Triangle Clear Sight Triangle Pool Deck Raised Planters -Native Plants -Drip Irrigation Clear Sight Triangle Clear Sight Triangle Retaining Wall, 18" Retaining Wall, 18" Commercial Entry Terrace, 490 SF Commercial Entry Terrace, 105 SF Raised Planters -Native Plants -Drip Irrigation Exterior Wall Sconce Lights Building Sign, 11' x 6'-11" 17 ' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 0" Lot Area: 34,299 SF N00o14'08"E 82.59' N8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " W 1 6 . 5 0 ' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 4 9 . 5 0 ' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 1 1 5 . 5 0 ' S00o14'08"W 41.25' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 8 2 . 5 0 ' N00o14'08"E 297.12' 7' - 9 3 / 4 " 38 ' - 7 1 / 4 " Site Plan 0 5'20'10' N November 12, 2025 Page 71 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Existing Conditions November 12, 2025 Page 72 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Existing Conditions The existing residential structures on the site are aged, substandard, not historically significant, and are not up to current building codes. Their replacement with new, code-compliant housing will improve living conditions and contribute to a healthier and safer neighborhood. The corner parcel currently contains a vacant commercial space, most recently a Pizza Hut. There is also a vacant lot between this corner lot and the three lots for which rezoning has been requested. Redevelopment will eliminate these eyesores, replacing them with an attractive, well-maintained building that enhances the character and visual appeal of the block. 1 21 - 0 9 5 20 2 2 - 0 8 - 3 1 RECORD OF SURVEY FOR THE PARCELS IN QUESTION. EXISTING DRIVEWAYS 1 1 21 - 0 9 5 20 2 2 - 0 8 - 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 423 4 1 November 12, 2025 Page 73 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Project Description November 12, 2025 Page 74 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Project Description The Building The proposed building is a five-story, mixed-use residential building designed to reinforce the 400 South/800 East transit corridor with an active ground floor and urban residential density above. The project introduces 110 residential units, a structured parking facility, and active community-serving spaces along the sidewalk, meeting the intent of the MU-5 district. Building Length Exception The proposed structure exceeds the 200-foot maximum contiguous building length standard in §21A.59.050(E). To mitigate bulk and support a pedestrian-friendly scale, the design incorporates: • Vertical and horizontal modulation including stepbacks, recessed balconies, and breaks in the façade plane (see Z-009). • Distinct material shifts (brick veneer, EIFS, architectural metal, wood accents) that visually separate masses. • Strong ground floor activation with gym, leasing, and community amenities occupying more than 80% of the 400 South and 800 East frontages (see Z-006). • Stepbacks above the second story (minimum 10’) that create a defined pedestrian-scaled base and reduce shadow/wind impacts (see Z-020). These strategies ensure the building reads as a series of smaller volumes rather than a single elongated block, meeting the intent of the code while allowing an exception for additional building length. Construction Type • Below Grade: Reinforced concrete structured parking. • First Level / Podium: Reinforced concrete structure housing active ground floor uses and structured parking. • Upper Levels (2–5): Anticipated wood frame construction over the podium; a steel frame alternative may be considered for efficiency and durability. Unit Count & Mix The project provides a balanced residential mix sized to attract diverse households: Unit Type Count % Of Total Range (SF) Studios 22 20% 445 - 536 sf Junior One-Bedroom 17 16% 630 - 651 sf One-Bedroom 44 40% 704 - 726 sf Two Bedroom 22 20% 951 - 1114 sf Three Bedroom 3 3% 1384 Four Bedroom 1 1% 1678 TOTAL 109 100%— November 12, 2025 Page 75 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Parking & Bicycle Facilities • Vehicle Parking: 89 structured stalls (internal and screened from the street) (Z-005, Z-006). • Bicycle Parking: 34 indoor bike spaces provided at ground level, near building entries, to encourage multimodal use. • Parking ratios comply with MU-5 standards and prioritize transit-oriented development. Exterior Materials The building is designed with a durable and varied material palette that breaks down the massing and enhances architectural quality (Z-011–Z-014, Z-018–Z-019): • Brick Veneer: Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer, Platinum 60% Matte / 40% Ruff Mix – grounding the base and emphasizing permanence. (or equal approved) • Metal Panels: PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate (Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4), PAC-CLAD Bone White flush panels, and PAC-CLAD Onyx composite panels — accentuating upper levels and balconies. (or equal approved) • EIFS: Medium warm gray with reveals and bone white accents, adding variation and texture. • Wood Accents: ChamClad Sunbleached Oak shadowline panel and brushed silver panels used at balconies and inset details, introducing warmth and residential character. (or equal approved) • Glazing: Clear anodized aluminum storefront and silver vinyl windows, with black powder-coated railings at balconies. This material strategy emphasizes a base–middle–top composition: • A concrete and brick base that grounds the structure. • A varied middle zone articulated with balconies, window bays, and material shifts. • A lightened upper portion with stepbacks and accent cladding, visually reducing the overall mass. Summary The proposed building is a concrete podium, wood/steel frame mixed-use building with 110 units, 89 parking stalls, 34 bicycle spaces, and a carefully curated material palette. While the building length exceeds 200 feet, the proposal meets the intent of the ordinance through modulation, stepbacks, material diversity, and strong ground-level activation, ensuring a pedestrian-scaled, context-sensitive, and transit-supportive development. November 12, 2025 Page 76 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Propose Development November 12, 2025 Page 77 of 160 Exterior Renderings November 12, 2025 Page 78 of 160 Exterior Renderings November 12, 2025 Page 79 of 160 Exterior Renderings November 12, 2025 Page 80 of 160 Exterior Renderings November 12, 2025 Page 81 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties General Plan Amendment CONTENT • Purpose and Justification • Proposed Modification to General Plan Map • Future Development • Community Benefit • Data Collection • Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement November 12, 2025 Page 82 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Purpose and Justification November 12, 2025 Page 83 of 160 AREA OF REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Purpose for the Amendment The primary purpose of this zoning amendment is to facilitate significant housing production in direct response to Salt Lake City's acute housing crisis. As outlined in Housing SLC, the city must entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023-2027 to address both projected population growth and existing housing deficits. This project transforms 7 existing substandard units into 109 modern, code-compliant residential units—representing a 15-fold increase in housing capacity on underutilized urban land. This requests a zoning map amendment for parcels 16-05-303-015, 16-05-303-016, and 16-05-303-017 from RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family, 35' Maximum Height) to MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories). This amendment will enable the redevelopment of underutilized properties containing deteriorated residential structures and a vacant, fire-damaged commercial building into a vibrant mixed-use development that directly advances Salt Lake City's housing and economic development objectives. FIG. 1 - CURRENT ZONING MAP AND AREA OF REQUESTED CHANGE RMF-35 to MU-5 TSA-UN-T to MU-5 November 12, 2025 Page 84 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties FIG. 2 - GRAPH OF POPULATION AND PROJECTED POPULATION, HOUSING SLC (LEFT), GRAPH OF EXISTING VS PROPOSED UNITS ON PROJECT AREA LOTS (RIGHT) 15x Increase in Housing 8x Increase in Family Units Justification for the Amendment 1. Alignment with City Planning Objectives Housing SLC Implementation: In June of 2023, the Salt Lake City Council voted to adopt Housing SLC, a five-year plan that is to “serve as a guiding document for the City over the next five years, providing a framework for action across City Departments and Divisions” (Housing SLC, page 58). Goal 1 of this plan is to entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023 and 2027. The population of Salt Lake City is projected to increase by 6,000 during the five-year period of the Plan, which will require an additional 3,000 new housing units on top of the existing deficit (Housing SLC, page 9). The problem is that there is very limited buildable land on which these additional units can be placed within the City. Many parts of the city are unable to be developed due to the presence of wetlands and foothills. Areas in proximity to the Salt Lake City International Airport cannot be built on due to Federal Aviation Administration regulations. Most of the developable land has already been built on. We are out of land to continue growing outward. The solution is greater density - providing more housing on the existing developable land. New developments in Salt Lake City are required to select at least five Moderate Income Housing Plan (MIHP) strategies that will be incorporated into the project. Projects must utilize at least six strategies in order to be eligible for state funding. Four of the strategies have to do with rezoning or amending regulations in order to allow for higher density and more multifamily residential dwellings (Strategies A, F, G, and W; Housing SLC, pages 28-29). The Housing SLC plan states that “The crisis we are currently facing has been decades in the making and extends beyond the municipal boundaries of the city, reaching across the county, the state, and the nation. It will take collaboration across governmental, non-profit, community, and private partners to work through this housing crisis.” That includes us. That includes you. The proposed rezoning and subsequent project helps meet these City goals. Currently, these lots host 7 units (4 one-bed, 1 two-bed, 1 three-bed, and 1 four-bed) while the proposed project would host 109 units (22 studio, 61 one-bed, 22 two-bed, 3 three-bed, and 1 four-bed). Mixed-Use Development Support: The project exemplifies the mixed-use, walkable development promoted throughout Salt Lake City's planning documents, creating an integrated live-work-shop environment that reduces transportation demand and supports local economic activity. November 12, 2025 Page 85 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone FIG. 3 - PORTION OF ZONING MAP, IMAGE COURTESY OF SLC Justification for the Amendment 2. Zoning Consistency and Logical Planning: The block in question is already predominantly zoned TSA- UN-T (~93%). Rezoning the remaining RMF-35 parcels to MU-5 will establish a consistent zoning pattern, reduce regulatory complexity, and support coherent urban planning. The initial request was for TSA-UN-T; however, during the application review, the zoning designation was changed to MU-5. The current request aligns with that designation and seeks to formally rezone the parcels to MU-5. 3. Optimal Land Use and Site Conditions: Underutilized Property Transformation: The current site contains deteriorated structures that cannot economically be renovated to meet current building codes and livability standards. The existing 4-plex, duplex, and single-family home are in poor condition, while the commercial space has been vacant and fire-damaged. Redevelopment represents the highest and best use of this prime urban location. Infrastructure Readiness: The development team is actively coordinating with Salt Lake City Public Utilities Department and utility consultants to evaluate infrastructure capacity needed to support the proposed project. Ongoing discussions indicate that the necessary systems can be planned to accommodate the development. In addition, a Traffic Impact Study has been prepared and is currently under review. Preliminary coordination with UDOT suggests that transportation impacts can be addressed, particularly given the site’s strong transit access and walkability. FIG. 4 - PROPERTY VIEW FROM TRAX, IMAGE COURTESY OF GOOGLE MAPS November 12, 2025 Page 86 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone Zoning Setback Buildable Area AERIAL FIRE ACCESS WIDTH REQUIREMENT THE MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH IS 26’, 800 E IS 24’ WHICH DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FIRE CODE REQUIREMENT. A AERIAL FIRE ACCESS OBSTRUCTION OVERHEAD UTILITY AND POWER LINES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED OVER AERIAL FIRE ACCESS ROAD OR BUILDING. CAERIAL FIRE ACCESS PROXIMITY TO BLDG. REQUIRED TO BE NOT LESS THAN 15’ AND NOT GREATER THAN 30’ FROM BUILDING. B 400 S 80 0 E LINDEN AVE 24' - 0" 11% of Building Perimeter 26 ' . M i n . Buildable Area 32' 15% of Building Perimeter Construction with Proposed Rezoning Rezone allows for SLCFD preferred approach, reduces asphalt and maximizes housing potential A B C Max.Allowable height 35’ Maximum allowable height 50’ Construction with Added Fire Lane Fire lane between zones results in additional asphalt and reduced housing A B C Max.Allowable height 35’ Maximum allowable height 50’ A B C Construction with Current Zoning SLCFD will not allow roofs at multiple heights FIG. 5 - 400 S AND LINDEN AVE. FIRE AERIAL ACCESS ANALYSIS Justification for the Amendment 4. Enhanced Public Safety and Emergency Access Fire Department Coordination: The project design has been developed in consultation with Salt Lake City Fire Department to ensure optimal emergency access. Current site constraints, including narrow streets and overhead power lines, limit emergency vehicle access under existing zoning. The MU-5 development enables unified site planning that significantly improves fire and emergency access compared to the fragmented current configuration. Modern Safety Standards: New construction will meet all current building and fire safety codes, replacing aged structures with modern safety systems and accessibility features. November 12, 2025 Page 87 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Rezone FIG. 6 - RENDERING OF PROPOSED BUILDING Justification for the Amendment Due to physical site constraints, aerial fire access from 800 East is not feasible. The road width, which cannot be increased, and presence of high voltage power lines prevent compliance with Salt Lake City Fire Department standards for aerial operations. Per Salt Lake City Code, the Fire Department requires a minimum of 25% of the building perimeter to be aerial apparatus accessible in order to ensure life safety and fire protection. Given the limitations along 800 East, the only viable way to meet this requirement is to provide aerial access along Linden Avenue and 400 South, which offer sufficient clearance, appropriate setbacks, and operational space for fire equipment. The requested zone change to MU-5 supports this layout by enabling a development form that can meet fire access requirements while also contributing to the city’s goals for higher-density, transit-oriented design. 5. Economic and Community Development Substantial Private Investment: The project represents significant private investment in neighborhood infrastructure and housing stock, generating construction employment and ongoing economic activity. Local Business Support: The 3,460 square feet of commercial space will accommodate multiple local businesses, professional services, and potentially charitable organizations, creating local employment and serving daily needs of residents and the surrounding community. Community-Endorsed Development: Local community area representatives have provided positive feedback on the project's approach to addressing vacant properties and increasing family housing options. 6. Family Housing Production Critical Family Unit Shortage: The project increases family-sized units (2-4 bedrooms) from 3 existing to 26 proposed— an eight-fold increase that directly addresses the shortage of family housing in Salt Lake City's urban core. The unit mix specifically responds to diverse household needs identified in the General Plan: • 22 studio units for workforce housing • 61 one-bedroom units for diverse household types • 22 two-bedroom units for small families • 3 three-bedroom units for larger families • 1 four-bedroom unit for larger families November 12, 2025 Page 88 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Justification for the Amendment 7. Environmental and Transportation Benefits Urban Infill Development: The project represents responsible urban infill that maximizes existing infrastructure rather than encouraging sprawling greenfield development. Reduced Transportation Demand: The combination of transit access, high walkability, and integrated commercial space minimizes vehicle trips per unit, supporting the city's sustainability and transportation efficiency goals. FIG. 7 - TRAX STOP NEAR PROPERTY, IMAGE COURTESY OF SLC FIG. 7 - PROPOSED HEIGHT TRANSITION 45.00° Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e Pr o p e r t y L i n e Setback 10'107' Stepback Building157' Setback 10' Angular Plane from (E) Property Building Context and Facade Length Diagram Elevation 0 8'32'16' FIG. 8 - PROPOSED HEIGHT TRANSITION 8. Compatibility with Surrounding Neighborhood Character Because the adjacent properties to the South and West are already zoned MU-5, the proposed amendment will not introduce incompatible land uses or disrupt the existing development pattern. Instead, it will promote continuity in building scale, architectural design, and streetscape character, thereby enhancing neighborhood cohesion. To ensure a sensitive and gradual transition from the MU-5 zone to the adjacent RMF-35 zone north of Linden Avenue, the proposed development will comply with the angular plane requirements outlined in Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.37.050. Specifically, a 45-degree angular plane measured from the shared property lines provides a clear framework for scaling down from higher-density, high-rise forms to lower-scale residential development. This design approach mitigates potential impacts on neighboring properties and supports a compatible urban form that respects the established residential context. November 12, 2025 Page 89 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Justification for the Amendment 9. Solar Shading Study: The comprehensive solar shading study demonstrates that the proposed 4-story mixed-use building at 370 S 800 E will not create adverse solar access impacts on neighboring properties. Key findings include: Contained Shadow Patterns: Shadows fall predominantly within the development site boundaries and on public street areas, Seasonal Stability: Both equinox and winter solstice conditions show consistent pattern of contained shadow impact, Time-of-Day Analysis: Morning and afternoon peak periods demonstrate minimal extension of shadows onto neighboring private properties. Responsible Building Design: Appropriate Scale: 4-story height balances density objectives with neighborhood compatibility, Strategic Orientation: Building placement and design minimize shadow extension during critical daylight hours, Transition Elements: Angular plane compliance and height stepping provide appropriate transitions to adjacent properties. Regulatory and Community Compatibility: Standards Compliance: Project meets all MU-5 zoning requirements for height, setbacks, and building relationships. Urban Context: Shadow patterns appropriate for established urban mixed-use area with existing infrastructure and development. Net Community Benefit: Minimal shadow impact is significantly outweighed by housing production, commercial activation, and neighborhood improvement benefits. The solar study confirms that this well-designed mixed-use development will integrate successfully into the neighborhood fabric while preserving appropriate solar access for surrounding properties. The building's scale, orientation, and positioning demonstrate careful consideration of neighboring properties' solar access needs while achieving important community housing and economic development objectives. FIG. 9 - EQUINOX - 9AM FIG. 11 - WINTER SOLSTICE - 9AM FIG. 10 - EQUINOX - 3PM FIG. 12 - WINTER SOLSTICE - 3PM November 12, 2025 Page 90 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Proposed Modification to General Plan Map November 12, 2025 Page 91 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties RMF-35 to MU-5 TSA-UN-T to MU-5 FIG. 14 - CURRENT ZONING MAP AND AREA OF REQUESTED CHANGE FIG. 13 - PORTION OF ZONING MAP Proposed Modification to General Plan Map The purpose of this requested General Plan amendment is to facilitate significant housing production in direct response to Salt Lake City's acute housing crisis. As outlined in Housing SLC, the city must entitle 10,000 new housing units between 2023-2027 to address both projected population growth and existing housing deficits. This project transforms 7 existing substandard units into 109 modern, code-compliant residential units—representing a 15-fold increase in housing capacity on underutilized urban land. Specifically, this request seeks to rezone the following parcels: 16-05-303-015, 16-05-303-016 & 16-05-303-017. From RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family, 35 units/acre) to MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories). November 12, 2025 Page 92 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Future Development November 12, 2025 Page 93 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Future Development 1. Proposed Use of the Property: Upon approval of the requested General Plan Amendment, the affected property is intended for development as a four-story structure designed and constructed in accordance with MU-5 zoning requirements. The development will feature active ground-floor uses, including commercial space, live/work units, and amenity and support spaces to engage the streetscape and contribute to a vibrant pedestrian environment. Parking will be incorporated internally within the structure to minimize its visual impact and support transit-oriented goals. Residential units will occupy floors one through four, providing a mix of housing types from studio to three bedroom units, consistent with the City’s goals for increased density and walkability in transit station areas. (Refer to Floor Plans) 2. Proposed Density of the Property: The current zoning designation, RMF-35 (Residential Multi-Family), permits a building height of up to 35 feet. The proposed MU-5 (Mixed Use, 5 stories) zoning allows for increased residential density and a maximum building height of up to 50 feet, subject to compliance with design and compatibility standards outlined in the Salt Lake City Code. Approval of this zone change would allow for the addition of approximately 24 residential units (studios, 1bed, 2bed, 3bed and 4bed) beyond what is currently permitted under RMF-35. This increase in density supports a more efficient use of the land in a transit-adjacent location and enables the development of a four-story, mixed-use building. The proposed density and height are compatible with the surrounding context and further the City’s goals for walkable, transit-oriented, and higher-intensity urban neighborhoods. FIG. 15 - ALLOWABLE VOLUME MU-5 ALLOWABLE VOLUME TSA-UN-T ALLOWABLE VOLUME RMF-35 ALLOWABLE VOLUME November 12, 2025 Page 94 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Future Development 3. Scale of the Development: The proposed development will consist of a five-story, mixed-use building that reflects the scale and character encouraged in the MU-5 zoning district. The structure will reach a height of approximately 55 feet, consistent with the maximum height allowed under the MU-5 zone and in keeping with surrounding buildings within the block, the majority of which are already recently zoned MU-5. Along Linden Avenue, the building will incorporate a 45-degree angular plane from the shared property lines, as required by Salt Lake City Code Section 21A.37.050, to provide a visually appropriate step-down in height and massing. This approach minimizes visual impact and supports a cohesive streetscape. In terms of footprint and form, the building will occupy the northern portion of the block, with internalized parking and active ground-floor uses that contribute to the pedestrian environment. The overall scale is compatible with the area’s evolving urban context and aligns with the City’s goals for higher-density, transit-oriented development. 4. Timing of the Development: The project will proceed to planning immediately upon approval of the requested Zoning Map Amendment. 5. Impact to Existing land uses and Occupants: At a prominent corner of the block is a vacant commercial building, most recently a Pizza Hut that was damaged by a transient-set fire. The subject property also features a mix of older, non- historical structures: a single-family home, a duplex, and a four-plex. These existing uses represent a fragmented and underutilized condition that does not align with the area’s evolving urban character or its potential for transit-oriented, mixed-use redevelopment. The buildings on-site are not historically significant, and offer limited contribution to the surrounding urban fabric or pedestrian experience. The vacancy and visible decline of the site diminish the vitality of the neighborhood, which is predominantly zoned MU-5 and currently experiencing significant reinvestment and redevelopment activity. Rents received on said properties do not support renovation of said buildings. The requested zone change would result in a financially viable project to redevelop all of the parcels, which will facilitate a cohesive, higher-density redevelopment that supports Salt Lake City’s vision for Transit Station Areas. The proposed mixed-use project will introduce active commercial uses, live/work spaces, and new housing options that enhance walkability, support transit ridership, and contribute to the long-term vibrancy and resilience of the neighborhood. FIG. 16 - CURRENT VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING November 12, 2025 Page 95 of 160 Site Plan 0 8'32'16' N 11’ - 5 ¾” 12’ - 4 ¼”103’ - 9 ¾”157’ - 0 ¼” 18’-1 ¾“ 17’ - 11 ¼” 10’ - 0”27’ - 5” Aerial Access Road WidthSet Back 22’ 2 ½” Existing Road WidthProximity 5’ 2 ½” 316’ - 8 ¼” 10 7 ’ - 2 ¾ ” Le s s t h a n 1 4 % o f B u i l d i n g P e r i m e t e r 54’ - 11 ¾” 293’ - 3 ¾ ” M a x D i a g o n a l D i m e n s i o n (Distanc e b e t w e e n A c c e s s R o a d s M i n . 1 4 6 ’ ½ ” ) Less than 2% of Perimeter Less than 7% of Perimeter 71 ’ - 1 0 ” 32 ’ - 8 ½ ” 24 ’ - 0 ” Le s s t h a n 9 % o f B u i l d i n g P e r i m e t e r Building Perimeter is 798’ 7 ¼” 5 Stories (over 30’, less than 60’) 110 Residential Units Required Fire Sprinkler System NFPA-13 AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD □ Access to one entire side of the building - D105.3 □ Road width is over 26’ - D105.2 □ The road curb is 18’ - 1 ¾” from the building - D105.3 40 0 S Li n d e n A v e n u e 800 E AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD □ Access to one entire side of the building - D105.3 □ Road width is over 26’ - D105.2 □ The road curb is 23’ - 1 ¾” from the building - D105.3 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length 150’ Hose Pull Length Existing Primary Feed Overhead Power Line Distance Between Access Roads is Over 139’ Proximity Exceeds Maximum Distance from Building Road Width Does Not Meet Fire Apparatus Access Road Requirements Existing Overhead Utility To be Buried or Relocated Fi r e L i n e , N O P A R K I N G 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 96 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 North Elevation 2 5 10 9 6 7 9 10 4 6 5 0 5'20'10' 1 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 97 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 East Elevation 1 2 6 3 7 97 9 6 8 7 9 2 5 5 1 10 10109 7 10 0 5'20'10' 1 7 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 98 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 South Elevation 1 2 5 10 10 9 78 5 9 10 9 5 6 0 5'20'10' 74 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 99 of 160 PAC-CLAD Burnished Slate Alternating Box Rib 2 & 4 Medium Warm Gray EFIS w/ Reveals PAC-CLAD Bone White Flush Wall Panel Black Powder Coated Railings Black Aluminum Storefront and Black Vinyl Windows Interstate Brick Thin Brick Veneer - Platinum 60% Matte 40% Ruff Mix - Modular 2 1/4" x 8" ChamClad Sunbleached Oak 6" Shadowline Panel -3" Reveal Bone White EFIS w/ Reveals ChamClad Black Sand 12" Flush Panel Cladding Type -1 (North and South Masses) Cladding Type -2 (On West Side) (10% of East Facade) (Elevator and Stair Penthouse) Cladding Type -3 (East Center Mass) (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -4 (West Center Mass) Cladding Type -5 (Base and Two Corner Balcony Insets (including ceilings at balconies on top floor) and Accent Cladding Window System Surround Cladding (On Balconies Surrounding Sliders) (Recesses on East and West Sides) (Between Storefront and Vinyl Windows) Open Rails Windows and Window Systems PAC CLAD -Onyx - PAC4000 Composite Panel System Flat Profile Metal Panel (Solid Rails and Balcony and Canopy Fascias) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 West Elevation 4 6 6 6 7 9 7 7 9 2 5 5 9 1 10 8 1 9 5 10 4 0 5'20'10' 2 5 8 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 100 of 160 South View from Across 8th East 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 101 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit November 12, 2025 Page 102 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit The development at 800 East Properties provides substantial community benefits as required by Section 21A.50.050.C, delivering housing that aligns with community needs and commercial space for local businesses that would not otherwise be provided without the zoning amendment. Section 21A.50.050.C.1.a - Housing Aligned with Community Needs Providing housing that aligns with the current or future needs of the community as determined by the general plan. Needs could include the level of affordability in excess of the number of dwellings that exist on the site, size in terms of number of bedrooms, or availability of housing for purchase. Dramatic Increase in Housing Supply The proposal transforms underutilized residential structures and vacant commercial space into 109 residential units - a significant increase from the existing 4-5 dwelling units currently on site. This represents over a 2,000% increase in housing density, directly addressing Salt Lake City's documented housing shortage. Family-Sized Housing Mix Addressing Community Needs The project's unit distribution specifically addresses the "size in terms of number of bedrooms" criterion identified in Section 21A.50.050.C.1.a: • Studios (22 units, 20%): 445-536 SF - Entry-level housing for young professionals and students • Junior One-Bedrooms (17 units, 16%): 630-651 SF - Transitional housing for couples and small households • One-Bedrooms (44 units, 40%): 704-726 SF - Core market housing for diverse household types • Two-Bedrooms (22 units, 20%): 951-1,114 SF - Family housing accommodating children and home offices • Three-Bedrooms (3 units, 3%): 1,384 SF - True family-sized units retaining families in the urban core • Four-Bedrooms (1 unit, 1%): 1,678 SF - True family-sized unit retaining families in the urban core This diverse mix directly responds to Salt Lake City's General Plan goals for housing diversity and the documented need for family-appropriate housing along transit corridors. The inclusion of larger 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom units (24% of total) specifically addresses the shortage of family housing in urban mixed-use developments. Alignment with General Plan Objectives The housing mix supports Plan Salt Lake's objectives for: Transit-Oriented Development: 109 units directly on the 400 South/800 East corridor Housing Diversity: Units ranging from 445 SF to 1,384 SF serve multiple income levels and family types Urban Density: Efficient use of existing infrastructure while maintaining neighborhood character STUDIO UNIT (22) ONE BED UNIT (61)TWO BED UNIT (22)THREE BED UNIT (3)FOUR BED UNIT (1) 497 SF 689-764 SF 1,025 SF 1,469 SF 1,678 SF November 12, 2025 Page 103 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit Section 21A.50.050.C.1.b - Commercial Space for Local Businesses, Providing commercial space for local businesses or charitable organizations. Community-Serving Commercial Programming The project provides 2,590 SF of active commercial space specifically designed to support local businesses and address documented community needs: Public Gymnasium (1,978 SF) • Addresses overcrowding at existing area fitness facilities • Serves both residents and the broader community • Creates employment for fitness professionals and support staff • Provides accessible health infrastructure along the transit corridor Local Business Commercial Space (612 SF) • Dog Wash Station: Serves pet owners in the dense residential corridor who currently lack convenient pet care facilities • TRAX Bike Storage & Repair: Supports cyclists using public transit, encouraging multimodal transportation • Flexible space designed to accommodate other neighborhood-serving businesses Local Business Benefits These commercial uses specifically benefit local entrepreneurs by: • Providing turn-key facilities for service businesses addressing unmet community needs • Creating visible, accessible storefronts with extensive glazing and sidewalk orientation • Offering affordable commercial space in a prime transit-accessible location • Supporting business sustainability through built-in customer base (109 residential units) and transit accessibility FIG. 18 - UTA BIKE LOCKER WEBSITEFIG. 17 - ICLEAN DOG WASH FIG. 19 - LOCAL GYM November 12, 2025 Page 104 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Community Benefit Section 21A.50.050.C.2.h - General Plan Policy Support The proposed community benefits align with multiple General Plan policies: • Grow Plan: Increasing density along transit corridors • Live Plan: Providing diverse housing options for different life stages • Connect Plan: Supporting multimodal transportation through bike facilities • Play Plan: Enhancing community health through fitness facilities Conclusion The 800E Properties development provides exceptional community benefits under Section 21A.50.050.C that would not be possible without the zoning amendment. The project transforms underutilized property into 110 units of diverse, family-appropriate housing while creating commercial space specifically designed to support local businesses and address documented community needs. These benefits - a 2,000%+ increase in housing supply with family-sized units and community-serving commercial space - clearly justify the requested zoning amendment and provide lasting value to the 400 South transit corridor neighborhood. November 12, 2025 Page 105 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Data Collection November 12, 2025 Page 106 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties 4 Plex - 346-348 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 4 Square Footage per Floor Unit Summary *Note: Unit B (main level) includes shared entrance, hall, and staircase to Unit A. Duplex - 350 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 2 Unit Summary Unit Est. Sq Ft Bedrooms Current Residents Bonus Rooms Rent Now Rent 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 A 500 1 1 $995 $995 $995 $675 B 800 1 1 2 finished basement bonus rooms $1,095 $1,095 $1,095 $895 C 1,600 2 1 Small office $1,495 $1,495 $1,195 $1,195 D 500 1 1 $895 $895 $895 $995 Sum 3,400 5 4 $4,480 $4,480 $4,180 $3,760 Floor Sq Ft per Floor Notes Floor 1 1,444 Floor 2 1,444 Basement ~1,444 Approx. 60-70% Finished Living Space + Utility Room Sum ~4,332 Unit Est. Sq Ft Bedrooms Current Residents Notes Rent Now Rent 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 352 560 1 1 $895 $995 $995 $945 354 1,380 3 3 $1,545 $1,295 $1,295 $1,295 Unfinished Basement 1,120 0 0 No residents have access to this space Sum 3,060 4 4 $2,440 $2,290 $2,290 $2,240 Data Collection November 12, 2025 Page 107 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties House - 354 S 800 E SLC, UT 84102 Unit Count: 1 Bedrooms: 4 Total People Living in Property: 5 Square Footage per Floor Rent Vacant Commercial Space - 775 E 400 S SLC, UT 84102 Current Use: Vacant Prior Occupant: Pizza Hut Square Footage: ~1,600 Sq Ft Cost to Lease Now 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 Rent $1,895 $1,895 $1,895 $1,895 Floor Sq Ft Floor 1 1,630 Floor 2 1,630 Unfinished Basement 1,090 Sum 2,720 Data Collection Now 2024 Rent 2023 Rent 2022 Rent $0 $0 $$ November 12, 2025 Page 108 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement November 12, 2025 Page 109 of 160 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement If the petition is successful, the owner will coordinate with the planning department to ensure compliance with City Ordnance 21A.50.050.D.4. and 21A.50.050.E, Tenant Displacement Obligations and Demolished Unit Replacement. Section 19.06.070.D.4 Tenant Relocation Assistance - Applicant Proposal There are seven (7) existing units, four (4) are occupied and three (3) are vacant. All units will be demolished as part of this proposed project. The existing four (4) leases are month-to-month short-term leases. Upon project approval the applicant will provide (60) written notice to existing tenants that their leases will be terminated and notice that the applicant will provide the relocation assistance identified herein to the remaining affected tenants. The applicant will provide each tenant the following assistance as provided under Section 19.06.070.D.4.a-d subject to the following terms: a. Moving expenses based on a reasonable estimate provided by the tenant, up to a maximum of $1,500. a. To qualify for moving expenses, the tenants will be required to provide applicant estimates/quotes (10) business days prior to expenses being incurred for reimbursement. b. The applicant will reimburse moving expenses based upon the estimate provided by tenant within (10) business days of receipt of estimates. b. Application fees for the replacement housing. a. The applicant will reimburse tenant for reasonable application fees up to maximum of (20) separate applications. b. The tenants must provide applicant copies of application fees and receipts of fees paid. c. The applicants will reimburse tenant application fees (10) business days after receipt of invoices. c. A reasonable deposit that the displaced tenant would have to pay to secure replacement housing. a. The applicant will reimburse deposits up to max amount equal to current monthly rent rate of tenant. b. The tenant will provide applicant invoices and receipts of required deposits for replacement housing within (10) business days of invoices. c. The applicant will reimburse invoices within (10) business days of receipt. d. Monthly Rental Assistance payment. The rental assistance payment is based upon the difference, if any, between the cost of the currently monthly rent of the existing housing and a reasonably comparable unit. The rental payment total amount paid shall not be more than $7,200. a. The applicant will provide rental assistance payment to tenants for the difference between current rent and rent for reasonably comparable replacement housing for up to (12) months total and/or a maximum of $7,200, whichever amount is less. b. The tenant seeking rental assistance will only qualify in for reimbursement if the tenant has found a reasonably comparable unit. Comparable is defined as equal in size, number of bedrooms, baths, level of finishes, amenities available, and age of property (within 20 years). Tenants will be required to submit comparable properties applications to application to confirm they are comparable properties. c. The tenant will provide applicant with a copy of the new lease and different rent calculation to applicant within (10) business days of commencement of lease for reimbursement. d. The applicant will reimburse tenant within (10) business of receipt of new lease and rent assistance calculation. November 12, 2025 Page 110 of 160 Tenant Displacement & Demolished Unit Replacement Section 19.060.070.E Demolished Unit Replacement There are (7) existing units that will be demolished as part of this proposed project. The future development will be replacing the existing housing units with units having the same number of bedrooms. Additionally, the applicant will provide the following option as permitted by Section 19.06.070.E.2. 2. As allowed under the City Code, the applicant will make a payment to the city in lieu of rental restrictions on the new unit to go toward the city’s housing fund to offset the loss of naturally affordable housing. The payment will be equal to the monthly rent of the units prior to demolition times outlined in the data tables on page 32 and 33 multiplied by the number of months between the time the unit is vacated prior to demolition until a temporary certificate of occupancy for applicant’s new development is issued. 1441 UTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, PARK CITY, UT 84098 | 435.649.0092 | ELLIOTTWORKGROUP.COM 800 E Properties November 12, 2025 Page 111 of 160 Fi r e L a n e S00o14'08"W 170.29' Building Footprint Transformer Sidewalk Parking Strip 800 East Si d e w a l k 40 0 S o u t h Li n d e n A v e n u e N00o14'08"E 82.59' N8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " W 1 6 . 5 0 ' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 4 9 . 5 0 ' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 1 1 5 . 5 0 ' S00o14'08"W 41.25' S8 9 o47 ' 0 2 " E 8 2 . 5 0 ' N00o14'08"E 297.12' Pool Deck (Level 2) Roof Deck (Roof Level) Building Footprint.............22,293.9 SF (65%) Driveway...............................1,316.9 SF (3.8%) Open Space.........................5,028 SF (14.7 %) Roof Decks..........................5,666 SF (16.5 %) Property.............................34,299.5 SF (100%) LEGEND Open Space Calculation November 12, 2025 Page 112 of 160 Durable Materials............14,592 SF (90%) Street Facing Facade......16,132 SF (100%) LEGEND Durable Materials............6,851 SF (100%) Street Facing Facade......6,851 SF (100%) LEGEND Durable Materials............4,106 SF (100%) Street Facing Facade......4,106 SF (100%) LEGEND Durable Building Materials Calculation SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" 800 East Facade SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" 400 South Facade SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" Linden Avenue Facade November 12, 2025 Page 113 of 160 First Floor Glass Facade 1079 SF (40%) First Floor Street Facing Facade 2,731 SF (100%) LEGEND Upper Floors Glass Facade 2,600 SF (20%) Upper Floors Street Facing Facade 12,781 SF (100%) First Floor Glass Facade 555 SF (41%) First Floor Street Facing Facade 1,333 SF (100%) LEGEND Upper Floors Glass Facade 1,040 SF (20%) Upper Floors Street Facing Facade 5,290 SF (100%) First Floor Glass Facade 200 SF (40%) First Floor Street Facing Facade 496 SF (100%) LEGEND Upper Floors Glass Facade 572 SF (16%) Upper Floors Street Facing Facade 3,537 SF (100%) Glazing Calculation SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" 800 East Facade SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" 400 South Facade SCALE:1/16" = 1'-0" Linden Avenue Facade November 12, 2025 Page 114 of 160 GRASSES PERENNIALS - Divide up plants equally, 24" O.C. Triangular Spacing Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 1 Gal. 32 Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Overadam' Feather Reed Grass 1 Gal. 24 Panicum virgatum 'Prarie Sky'Switch Grass 1 Gal. 38 Panicum virgatum 'Shenandoah'Switch Grass 1 Gal. 26 Schizachyrium scoparium 'Ha Ha Tonka' Little Blue Stem 1 Gal. 32 Schizachyrium scoparium 'Smoke Signal' Little Blue Stem 1 Gal. 36 Schizachyrium scoparium 'Twilight Zone' Little Blue Stem 1 Gal. 16 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed 1 Gal. 36 1 Gal. Achillea millefolium 'Summerwine'Yarrow Agastache cana 'Sinning Sonoran' Wild Hyssop Campanula portenshlagiana Dalmatian Bellflower Echinacea Big Sky Yellow Coneflower Gaillardia aristata 'Arizona Sun'Blanket Flower Guara lindheimeri Whirling Butterflies Guara Heuchera 'Firefly'Coral Bells Oenothera missouriensis Missouri Evening Primrose Penstemon eatonii Eaton's Beardedtongue Phlox subulata Creeping Phlox Salvia nemorosa 'May Night'Salvia Notes: 1. All Planter Beds Shall be Covered in 4" Min. of Bark or Rock Mulch Depending on Location. 2. Placement of Trees to be Approved by Landscape Architect. 3. See Civil Drawings for Existing and Proposed Utility Locations and Proposed Grading and Drainage. 4. Areas Impacted During the Construction Process Outside the Limit of Disturbance to be Restored. Ramp Down Parking Garage Entry Drive Fi r e L a n e Parking Garage Entry Drive Lease Space Gym Space DN UP UP DN 800 East Un i v e r s i t y B l v d . SHRUBS TREES SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY. Acer tataricum 'GarAnn' Hot Wings Tartarian Maple 2" Cal. 2 Amelanchier alnifolia 'Oblelisk'Columnar Serviceberry 8-10" Tall 3 Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 15 Gal. 7 Koelreuteria paniculata 'Fastigiata' Columnar Goldenrain Tree 8-10' Tall 6 Zelkova serrata 'City Sprite'Zelkova 2" Cal. 7 Forsythia 'Nimbus'Dwarf Forsythia 5 Gal. 16 Physocarpus opulifolius Little Angel Dwarf Ninebark 5 Gal. 18 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'Fragrant Sumac 5 Gal. 25 Pinus mugo 'Slowmound'Mugo Pine 5 Gal. 15 Salix repens argentea Silver Creeping Willow 5 Gal. 19 PLANTING SCHEDULE Roof Top Deck 2nd Level Landscape Plan 0 10'40'20' N Proposed Building November 12, 2025 Page 115 of 160 Parking Garage Entry Drive Fi r e L a n e Parking Garage Entry Drive 800 East Un i v e r s i t y B l v d . TREES SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY. GRASSES Amelanchier alnifolia 'Oblelisk'Columnar Serviceberry 8-10" Tall 5 Bouteloua gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 1 Gal. 14 Schizachyrium scoparium 'Ha Ha Tonka' Little Blue Stem 1 Gal. 13 Schizachyrium scoparium 'Twilight Zone' Little Blue Stem 1 Gal. 21 Notes: 1. All Planter Beds Shall be Covered in 4" Min. of Rock Mulch. 2. Placement of Trees to be Approved by Landscape Architect. 3. See Civil Drawings for Existing and Proposed Utility Locations and Proposed Grading and Drainage. 4. Areas Impacted During the Construction Process Outside the Limit of Disturbance to be Restored. PLANTING SCHEDULE Landscape Plan - Roof Top 0 10'40'20' N Proposed Building Roof Top Deck November 12, 2025 Page 116 of 160 NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIALS IN QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTINGS SHOWN ON ALL DRAWINGS. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN OR EQUIVALENT. 4. NO PLANT SHALL BE PUT INTO THE GROUND BEFORE ROUGH GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUAL. 5. ALL PLANTS SHALL BEAR THE SAME RELATIONSHIP TO FINISHED GRADE AS THE PLANT'S ORIGINAL GRADE IN THE CONTAINER, B&B, OR IF TRANSPLANTED. 6. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN. NO CONTAINER GROWN STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED AT TIME OF PLANTING. 7. WITH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER BALL SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE SURFACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 8. THE DAY PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE STAKED FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUAL. 9. AT PLANTING TIME, ALL PLANTS SHALL BE THINNED BY REMOVING A BALANCED ONE-THIRD OF THE VEGETATIVE MATERIAL. DO NOT CUT LEADERS. 10. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTI-DESSICANT WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTI-DESSICANT AT THE BEGINNING OF THEIR FIRST WINTER. 11. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING THE FIRST 24-HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL THEN BE WATERED AS NEEDED AND SUGGESTED BY LOCAL CONDITIONS DURING THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. 12. AREAS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE RAKED OF STONES AND DEBRIS. DEBRIS AND STONES OVER 1" IN DIAMETER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 13. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN AFTER EACH PLANT HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER REPRESENTATIVE. MAINTENANCE INCLUDES WATERING, PRUNING, WEEDING, MULCHING, REPLACEMENT OF SICK OR DEAD PLANT MATERIAL, AND ANY OTHER CARE NECESSARY FOR THE PROPER GROWTH OF THE PLANT MATERIAL. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PLANS TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH GRADING AND SURFACE UTILITIES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT HIS WORK DOES NOT INTERRUPT ESTABLISHED OR PROJECTED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LIGHTING AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTORS REGARDING TIMING OF INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL. 17. EVERY POSSIBLE SAFEGUARD SHALL BE TAKEN TO PROTECT BUILDING SURFACES, EQUIPMENT AND FURNISHINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE OR INJURY TO PERSON OR PROPERTY WHICH MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 18. ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED EITHER ENTIRELY IN OR ENTIRELY OUT OF PLANTING BEDS. PLANTING BED LINES ARE NOT TO BE OBSTRUCTED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE WHOLLY RESPONSIBLE FOR STABILITY AND PLUMB CONDITIONS OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS, AND SHALL BE LEGALLY LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY INSTABILITY OF ANY PLANT MATERIALS. STAKING OF TREES OR SHRUBS, IF DESIRED OR REQUESTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHALL BE DONE UTILIZING A METHOD AGREED UPON BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AS INDICATED ON THE DOCUMENTS. 20. UPON COMPLETION OF ALL LANDSCAPING, AN INSPECTION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK SHALL BE HELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER FOR SCHEDULING THE INSPECTION AT LEAST SEVEN (7) DAYS PRIOR TO THE ANTICIPATED INSPECTION DATE. 21. ALL TREES, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR 12 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. REPLACEMENT PLANTS USED SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL 90 DAYS. 22. IN THE EVENT OF VARIATION BETWEEN QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND THE PLANS, THE PLANT SCHEDULE SHALL CONTROL. IMPROPER PLANT COUNT MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NO CAUSE FOR ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. SOD QUANTITY TAKE-OFFS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING. 23. ALL LAWN AREAS TO BE SEEDED BY HYDROSEEDER USING A MULCH CONTAINING TAKIFIER 24. PERENNIALS TO BE PLANTED @ 24" O.C. IN CLUSTERS OF 3-10 PER SPECIES AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY SITE PLACEMENT OF PLANTS BEFORE PLANTING BEGINS. 25. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES. 26. ALL PERENNIAL BEDS TO BE MULCHED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" PINE BARK. 27. LANDSCAPE AREA WILL BE COVERED 100% BY EITHER DRIP OR SPRAY IRRIGATIONS. AN IRRIGATION PLAN WILL BE INCLUDED AS A DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT AND WILL BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY COUNTY PRIOR TO IRRIGATION AND PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION. 28. ALL MAINTAINED LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE COVERED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 1. PLACE BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL 2. REMOVE ALL SYNTHETIC SOIL WRAPPING MATERIALS (TREATED BURLAP, NYLON TWINE, WIRE BASKETS, ETC.) AND DISCARD UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE EXCAVATE HOLE TO DIAMETER 2X WIDER THAN ROOTBALL. BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX. BERM TO FORM DEPRESSED WATERING BASIN. (TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO END OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD.) ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EXPOSED, MULCH SHOULD BE WITHIN 4" OF SHRUB TRUNK SET CROWN 2" HIGHER THAN FINISH GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLING NOTES: SCALE: SHRUB2NTS SECTION 5 6 2 1 1/2 SIZE ROOTBALL 1/2 SIZE 3 PLACE BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL 7 6 1 2 3 4 7 4" DEEP BARK MULCH4 5 5 1. INSTALL TREE PLUMB 2. REMOVE ALL SYNTHETIC SOIL WRAPPING MATERIALS AND WIRE BASKET PLACE BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE EXCAVATE HOLE TO DIAMETER 2X WIDER THAN ROOTBALL. BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX. BERM TO FORM DEPRESSED WATERING BASIN. (TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO END OF MAINTENANCE PERIOD.) 4" DEEP BARK MULCH ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EXPOSED; MULCH SHOULD NOT BE WITHIN 4" OF TREE TRUNK TOP OF ROOTBALL SHALL BE 1-2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE NOTES: SCALE: DECIDUOUS TREE1NTS SECTION 3 4 5 6 7 2 1 1/2 SIZE ROOTBALL 1/2 SIZE 31 2 4 5 5 6 7 12" DEEP PLANTING MIX 4" DEEP BARK MULCH GRASSES (SEE PLANTING PLAN) SEE PLAN FOR EDGE CONDITION SEE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING SCALE: GRASSES3NTS SECTION/PLAN 3 4 5 2 1 PLAN SECTION VA R I E S 1 2 3 4 6 12" DEEP PLANTING SOIL MIX 4" DEEP BARK MULCH GROUNDCOVER/PERENNIALS SEE PLAN FOR EDGE CONDITION SEE PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING SCALE: GROUNDCOVER/PERENNIALS4NTS SECTION/PLAN 3 4 5 2 1 PLAN SECTION VA R I E S 1 2 3 4 5 Landscape Details November 12, 2025 Page 117 of 160 This page has intentionally been left blank OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit WILLIAMSEN VC, LLC SEN VC, LLC 154 E MYRTLE AVE VINCENT COURT LLC T COURT LLC 154 E MYRTLE AVE # 303 HP COUNCIL CREST LLC L CREST LLC 2855 WASHINGTON BLVD SUSAN N JOHNSON N N JOHNSON 752 S 900 E SPENCER STEWART APARTMENTS LLC RTMENTS LLC PO BOX 1521 MARK R REX; MAHA A BARRANI (JT) ARRANI (JT)744 E 300 S JAMES R GARDNER; LYNN F GARDNER (JT) ARDNER (JT)626 E SIXTH AVE GREGORY P. REHERMANN; EDWINA REHERMANN (JT) ERMANN (JT)PO BOX 1259 MELISSA KELLY FRYER KELLY FRYER 319 S 800 E 1 BIN GUO BIN GUO 3468 S SCOTT PARK LN COLLETTE A HOLMES TE A HOLMES 319 S 800 E 3 ELIZABETH A DAYTON TH A DAYTON 3240 SHADOWBROOK DR MADDOX FAMILY TRUST MARRIED A B ALTERNATE B REVOCABLE LIVING TRUS6385 PASEO ASPADA HUANHE LI; QIYUAN WU (JT) UAN WU (JT)319 S 800 E 6 CITY HAVEN CONDOMINIUMS PH 1 OWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION262 E 3900 S # 200 MICHAEL NUNEZ CHAEL NUNEZ 662 E WILSON AVE PAUL HOFFMAN AUL HOFFMAN 3702 CHANNEL PLACE JONATHAN ACCARRINO N ACCARRINO 2905 CLAREMONT RD SARA BRINGHURST BRINGHURST 320 S 800 E # 14 CLAUDIA BATEY SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST 07/02/2019 07/02/2019 3275 BUTTERFLY LN MIN YANG MIN YANG 1180 S FOOTHILL DR # 712 MADISON KATE MUNGER; JONAS SETH MUNGER (JT) MUNGER (JT)310 S 800 E 17 COLLARD TRUST 11/06/2012 11/06/2012 13387 VIA RANCHERO DR WILLIAM CHARLES SISKA; ELIZABETH SIMONA CONLEY (JT) CONLEY (JT)3604 S ASTRO CIR JIE SHI CHUN IE SHI CHUN 320 S 800 E # 20 MCKENNZIE GENETTI LIVING TRUST 06/14/2018 06/14/2018 310 S 800 E 21 CARRIE SNOW CARRIE SNOW 320 S 800 E # 22 LYNETTE M EICHERS; FRANKIE MCCANDLESS (JT) NDLESS (JT)2849 E 2850 S IREVA G PETTY; BPB TRUST ; BPB TRUST 2001 S WINDSOR ST WILLIAMSEN SOUTH JORDAN INC JORDAN INC 154 E MYRTLE AVE # 303 JALEH AFSHAR ALEH AFSHAR 777 HAMILTON AVE ABDELAZIZ ABOELSEUD Z ABOELSEUD 721 E LINDEN AVE PAK TRUST PAK TRUST 727 E LINDEN AVE TRAVIS COE; KRISTIE GILES (JT) GILES (JT)116 W LAYTON AVE LEON SHERIDAN CHODOS; GISELA JOHANNA CHODOS (JT) CHODOS (JT)928 S LAKE ST JACEK A KOWALCZYK; ALINA J KOWALCZYK (JT) ALCZYK (JT)739 E LINDEN AVE KIMBERLY GOODSON; JARED WILKINSON (JT) KINSON (JT)743 E LINDEN AVE DARIN D ARNELL IN D ARNELL 4503 W 3285 S SALT CITY URBAN PROPERTIES LLC PERTIES LLC PO BOX 521402 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 12 BAYO VISTA WAY KHRIS JENSEN HRIS JENSEN 325 S LAKER CT KADRI O BARRANI I O BARRANI PO BOX 581432 WU-LANG KAO WU-LANG KAO 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 21 NICOLE N DAVIS OLE N DAVIS 156 E 900 S ZIONS FIRST NATIONAL BANK TIONAL BANK PO BOX 54288 SLC 400 S LLC C 400 S LLC 12555 HIGH BLUFF DR #330 VIDOVICH-765 LOFTS LP 65 LOFTS LP 960 N SANT ANTONIO RD ABBY CONDON; RACHEL CONDON; DARC, LLC (JT) C, LLC (JT)323 S 800 E NIKOLE J PAULOS LE J PAULOS 596 EL SUENO RD DEBORA J WRATHALL; JAMES BIRCHLER (JT) RCHLER (JT)331 S 800 E JEFF TAYLOR JEFF TAYLOR 1160 E 200 S JADE PROPERTIES, LLC ERTIES, LLC 647 S 350 E ERIC NESS ERIC NESS 1345 S 1200 W ADELE CORPORATION CORPORATION 815 E 400 S TRMC RETAIL LLC RETAIL LLC PO BOX 711 WDG SEVENTH EAST, LLC H EAST, LLC 1178 LEGACY CROSSING BLVD DON C HALE INVESTMENT COMPANY ENT COMPANY PO BOX 902020 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS H JC OF LDS 50 E NORTHTEMPLE ST #2225 LP SPIRIT REALTY IRIT REALTY 744 E 400 S LIBERTY BLVD ASSOCIATES LLC OCIATES LLC 6440 S WASATCH BLVD VALLEY HEIGHTS INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 496 W WINDMILL GATE CV DANIEL THOMAS LAMBERT MAS LAMBERT 327 S 700 E 2 LUCAS PARELIUS AS PARELIUS 327 S 700 E 3 BENJAMIN KARTCHNER; MELISSA KARTCHNER (JT) TCHNER (JT)7126 E OSBORN RD #3012 WHITNEY ESPINEL NEY ESPINEL 327 S 700 E 5 JAMES MAXWELL THOMAS WELL THOMAS 327 S 700 E 6 MABEL OWNERS ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION 610 N 800 W MANA DEVELOPMENT LLC LOPMENT LLC 790 N NORTHSHORE ST CHRISTOPHER DEMURI; MEREDITH DEMURI (JT) DEMURI (JT)1420 E CIRCLE WY OILWELL PROPERTIES LC OPERTIES LC 7430 S CREEK RD # 200 JOHN BOLTON JOHN BOLTON 820 E 400 S Occupant PARCEL_ADDR NEW_UNIT Current Occupant 302 S 700 E Current Occupant 314 S 700 E REAR Current Occupant 314 S 700 E Current Occupant 660 E 300 S Current Occupant 706 E 300 S Current Occupant 315 S 700 E Current Occupant 710 E 300 S Current Occupant 718 E 300 S Current Occupant 726 E 300 S Current Occupant 730 E 300 S Current Occupant 740 E 300 S Current Occupant 752 E 300 S Current Occupant 754 E 300 S Current Occupant 766 E 300 S Current Occupant 804 E 300 S Current Occupant 319 S 800 E 2 Current Occupant 319 S 800 E 4 Current Occupant 319 S 800 E 5 Current Occupant 319 S 800 E Current Occupant 310 S 800 E 11 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 12 Current Occupant 310 S 800 E 13 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 14 Current Occupant 310 S 800 E 15 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 16 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 18 Current Occupant 310 S 800 E 19 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 20 Current Occupant 320 S 800 E 22 Current Occupant 310 S 800 E Current Occupant 328 S 700 E Current Occupant 330 S 700 E Current Occupant 677 E 400 S Current Occupant 320 S 700 E Current Occupant 655 E 400 S Current Occupant 335 S 700 E Current Occupant 729 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 733 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 320 S REEVES TER Current Occupant 749 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 757 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 327 S REEVES TER Current Occupant 324 S 800 E Current Occupant 328 S 800 E Current Occupant 336 S 800 E Current Occupant 747 E LINDEN AVE NFF Current Occupant 761 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 747 E LINDEN AVE NFF2 Current Occupant 753 E LINDEN AVE Current Occupant 323 S REEVES TER NFF Current Occupant 321 S REEVES TER Current Occupant 365 S 700 E Current Occupant 346 S 800 E Current Occupant 350 S 800 E Current Occupant 354 S 800 E Current Occupant 373 S 700 E Current Occupant 701 E 400 S Current Occupant 775 E 400 S Current Occupant 765 E 400 S Current Occupant 370 S 800 E Current Occupant 327 S 800 E Current Occupant 339 S 800 E Current Occupant 343 S 800 E Current Occupant 347 S 800 E Current Occupant 353 S 800 E Current Occupant 809 E 400 S Current Occupant 365 S 800 E Current Occupant 674 E 400 S Current Occupant 680 E 400 S Current Occupant 416 S 700 E Current Occupant 424 S 700 E Current Occupant 716 E 400 S Current Occupant 762 E 400 S Current Occupant 420 S 800 E Current Occupant 424 S 800 E Current Occupant 712 E 400 S Current Occupant 714 E 400 S Current Occupant 710 E 400 S Current Occupant 425 S 700 E Current Occupant 455 S 700 E Current Occupant 327 S 700 E 1 Current Occupant 327 S 700 E 4 Current Occupant 327 S 700 E Current Occupant 348 S LAKER CT Current Occupant 821 E 400 S Current Occupant 411 S 800 E Current Occupant 804 E 400 S OWN_CITY OWN_STATEOWN_ZIP MURRAY UT 84107 MURRAY UT 84107 OGDEN UT 84401 OREM UT 84097 PARK CITY UT 84060 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84103 KAMAS UT 84036 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84106 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 PROVO UT 84604 CARLSBAD CA 92009 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 MURRAY UT 84107 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84105 NEWPORT BEACHCA 92663 RALEIGH NC 27608 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 MORGAN HILLCA 95037 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84108 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SARATOGACA 95070 MILLCREEKUT 84109 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 MILLCREEKUT 84109 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84105 MURRAY UT 84107 MENLO PARKCA 94025 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84115 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84105 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 WEST VALLEYUT 84120 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84152 SAN RAFAELCA 94901 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84158 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84115 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84111 LEXINGTONKY 40555 SAN DIEGOCA 92130 LOS ALTOS CA 94022 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SANTA BARBARACA 93110 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 FARMINGTONUT 84025 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84104 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 DALLAS TX 75221 CENTERVILLEUT 84014 SANDY UT 84090 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84150 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 HOLLADAY UT 84121 DRAPER UT 84020 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SCOTTSDALEAZ 85251 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 CENTERVILLEUT 84014 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84103 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84103 SANDY UT 84093 SALT LAKE CITYUT 84102 CITY ZIPCODE STATE SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT SALT LAKE CITY84102 UT This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2025 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E. and amending the Central Community Plan Future Land use Map pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S. 800 E., and 775 E. 400 S.) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Residential Multi-Family) to MU-5 (Mixed Use 5) District pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00641; and amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S. 800 E., and 775 E. 400 S. from Medium Density Residential (15- 30 dwelling units/acre) and Medium Density Transit Oriented Development (10-50 dwelling units/acre) to High Density Transit Oriented Development (50 or more dwelling units/acre) pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00640. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on November 12, 2025 to consider a petition by Elliott Work Group, representing the property owners, Hardage Hospitality, to rezone the parcels located at 346 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-015-0000), 350 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-016-0000) and 354 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-017-0000) from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Residential Multi-Family) to MU-5 (Mixed Use 5) pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00641; and to amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map future land use designations pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-015-0000), 350 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05- 303-016-0000), 354 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-017-0000), 370 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16- 05-303-034-0000), and 775 E. 400 S. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-028-0000 from (15-30 dwelling units/acre) and Medium Density Transit Oriented Development (10-50 dwelling units/acre) to 2 High Density Transit Oriented Development (50 or more dwelling units/acre) pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00640. WHEREAS, at its November 12, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) to amend the Zoning Map on Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00641, and recommended that the City Council deny the application to amend the Central Community Future Land Use Map on Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00640. WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E., identified on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned from RMF-35 (Moderate Density Residential Multi-Family) to MU-5 (Mixed Use 5). SECTION 2. Amending the Central Community Future Land Use Map. The Salt Lake City Central Community Future Land Use Map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the future land use of properties, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E., 354 S. 800 E., 370 S. 800 E., and 775 E. 400 S., identified on Exhibit “B” attached hereto, shall be and hereby are amended to change the future land use designations from Medium Density Residential (15-30 dwelling units/acre) and Medium Density Transit Oriented Development (10-50 dwelling units/acre) to High Density Transit Oriented Development (50 or more dwelling units/acre). 3 SECTION 3. Conditions. The proposed amendments are conditioned upon the Applicant entering into a development agreement with Salt Lake City that will mitigate the demolition of the existing residential units and displacement of tenants and specify the details and terms of the Community Benefit required by the Zoning Ordinance, section 21A.50.050. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 5. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 3 above have not been met within one year after adoption, then this ordinance shall become null and void. Prior to such one year period, the City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions identified above. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ______ day of ______________, 2026. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor’s Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. 4 ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2026. Published: ______________. Ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to properties located at 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E and rezoning 346 S. 800 E., 350 S. 800 E. and 354 S. 800 E. APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:__2/19/26___________________________ By: ___________________________________ Courtney Lords, Senior City Attorney 5 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Descriptions of Properties to be Rezoned: 346 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-015-0000) 818,BEG 2 RDS S FR NE COR LOT 8, BLK 40, PLAT B, SLC SUR; S 2.5 ,RDS; W 5 RDS; N 2.5 RDS; E 5 RDS TO BEG 4672-0490 7573-827 ,8639-2371 9148-9411 9161-3070 TO 3073 9161- 3087 9271-8073 ,9271-8074 9316-9587 10353-4159 350 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-016-0000) 818,BEG 4 1/2 RDS S FR NE COR LOT 8, BLK 40, PLAT B, SLC SUR; S ,2 1/2 RDS; W 8 RDS; N 2 1/2 RDS; E 8 RDS TO BEG. 4158-245 ,4158-0244 3673-318, 4002-43 7176-0873 8639-6488 9317-0208 ,10353-4159 354 S. 800 E (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-017-0000) 818,COM 5.25 FT N FR SE COR LOT 8 BLK 40 PLAT B SLC SUR N 44.25 ,FT W 8 RDS S 2.5 RDS E 1 RD S 3 FT E 7 RDS TO BEG 7435-1119 ,9305-1553 10353-4159 6 EXHIBIT “B” Legal Descriptions of Properties to be Amended on the Central Community Future Land Use Map: 346 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-015-0000) 818,BEG 2 RDS S FR NE COR LOT 8, BLK 40, PLAT B, SLC SUR; S 2.5 ,RDS; W 5 RDS; N 2.5 RDS; E 5 RDS TO BEG 4672-0490 7573-827 ,8639-2371 9148-9411 9161-3070 TO 3073 9161- 3087 9271-8073 ,9271-8074 9316-9587 10353-4159 350 S. 800 E. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-016-0000) 818,BEG 4 1/2 RDS S FR NE COR LOT 8, BLK 40, PLAT B, SLC SUR; S ,2 1/2 RDS; W 8 RDS; N 2 1/2 RDS; E 8 RDS TO BEG. 4158-245 ,4158-0244 3673-318, 4002-43 7176-0873 8639-6488 9317-0208 ,10353-4159 354 S. 800 E (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-017-0000) 818,COM 5.25 FT N FR SE COR LOT 8 BLK 40 PLAT B SLC SUR N 44.25 ,FT W 8 RDS S 2.5 RDS E 1 RD S 3 FT E 7 RDS TO BEG 7435-1119 ,9305-1553 10353-4159 370 S 800 E (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-034-0000) 922,BEG N 00?01'02 W 99 FT FR SE COR OF LOT 1, BLK 40, PL B, ,SLC SUR; S 89?57'57" W 115.50 FT; N 00?01'02" W 71.33 FT; N ,89?58'01" E 115.50 FT; S 00?01'02" E 71.33 FT TO BEG. 0.19 ,AC M OR L. 4824-0588 5582-2351 5598-1278 6869-0086 6870-0330,8405-0319 775 E. 400 S. (Tax ID No. 16-05-303-028-0000) 818,COM AT SE COR LOT 1, BLK 40, PLAT B, SLC SUR; W 74 1/4 FT; N,6 RDS; E 74 1/4 FT; S 6 RDS TO BEG, ALSO BEG 4 1/2 RDS W OF ,SE COR SD LOT 1; W 2 1/2 RDS; N 6 RDS; E 2 1/2 RDS; S 6 RDS ,TO BEG 4516-1034 6226-512 6226-0518 9129-0956 9237-0227 ,9278-796 This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: Fortune Road Street vacation (PLNPCM2025-00864) ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Thatcher Company to vacate (or relinquish ownership of) a portion of Fortune Road between the intersection with Wallace Road (approximately 1900 West) and where the road dead ends at approximately 2040 West as shown in the image below. The applicant owns all properties abutting this section of the road and their stated intent is to consolidate the surrounding properties and incorporate the street segment into the Thatcher campus. If approved by the Council, the applicant would be required to obtain an appraisal for the street segment and purchase it from the City at market value. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at its January 14, 2026 meeting and held a public hearing at which no one spoke. Planning staff recommended and the Commission voted 6:1 to forward a recommendation of approval to the City Council for the requested street vacation with the conditions listed below. The Commissioner who voted against the proposal did not say why they were opposed. 1. The lots shall be consolidated with the portion of the vacated street so that no parcel is landlocked or without public street frontage. 2. Any private utilities installed within the proposed vacated right-of-way must be granted easement for access to the City Engineering Department. 3. The road should be maintained as a fire access, with a fire-approved gate, per the department comments in Attachment F in the staff report, and the fire hydrant shall remain active and accessible. Item Schedule: Page | 2 Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed partial street closure, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. Vicinity map with the subject road segment proposed to be vacated highlighted. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The Thatcher Company campus is located between Redwood Road and Interstate 215, and between California Avenue and the Surplus Canal. Given this location, it is highly unlikely a new road would be built connecting to Fortune Road. The company manufactures and distributes chemicals. It is their belief that vacating the street segment will allow increased security and safety at its campus by limiting access to its properties. As noted in the Planning Commission recommended conditions, a fire-approved gate would allow emergency access to the property, and a fire hydrant would remain active. Thatcher’s properties are zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing) and M-2 (Heavy Manufacturing). Surrounding zoning is primarily M-1 in the immediate area and transitions to MU-5 (Mixed-Use 5) for properties on both sides of Redwood Road. R-1/5,000 single-family residential is the dominant zoning farther to the east. At the time this street vacation application was submitted, street vacations were processed like alley vacations following standards found in Salt Lake City Code Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City Owned Alleys. At least one of the following policy considerations was required to be met: A. Lack of Use Page | 3 B. Public Safety C. Urban Design D. Community Purpose As discussed in Attachment D (page 22) of the Planning Commission staff report, Planning staff found the lack of use and public safety considerations are applicable. (It is worth noting that the recently adopted text amendment for alley and street vacations does not affect how this street vacation is processed. The applicant would be required to purchase the street property at market value under the current and previous ordinance.) KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified three key considerations during analysis of this proposal which are found on pages 5-6 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals & Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning reviewed the proposed street vacation and how it aligns with the Westside Master Plan. The Plan states: “The west side of Redwood Road is not suitable for residential development because many of the properties have been, or are currently, sites for intensive industrial development. Even the parcels that have been remediated or that were not used in this way are still adjacent to those industrial sites. In this case, Redwood Road’s role as a buffer is critical to achieving the vision for the corridor.” Westside Master Plan, page 54 Given the nature of surrounding properties, it is unlikely the properties surrounding this segment of Fortune Road will be redeveloped into other lower intensity uses. It is Planning’s opinion that the proposed street vacation does not conflict with the Westside Master Plan. Consideration 2 – Compliance with Zoning Requirements Street vacations require that no parcels will be landlocked or left without street access. If the proposed street vacation is adopted by the Council, some parcels would be landlocked. However, as noted above, all abutting parcels are owned by the applicant. They plan to consolidate the parcels into their campus which would resolve the issue. Some of the parcels abutting the street are smaller than the minimum 10,000 and 20,000 square feet required by M-1 and M-2 zoning. There is no maximum lot size for either zone, so consolidating the parcels is not anticipated to create an issue. Consideration 3 – Department Review Comments During City department review of the proposed street vacation, the Fire Department included a condition requiring the vacated street to remain a fire access road with a department approved gate, and the existing fire hydrant remain active and accessible. The Engineering Division would require an easement for any private utilities in the subject section of road. City Transportation, Public Utilities, Urban Forestry, and Police did not express concerns with the proposal. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY September 2, 2025 – Application for street vacation was received by Planning Division. September 18, 2025 – Petition assigned to Cassie Younger, Senior Planner. Additional information requested from the applicant. Page | 4 October 30, 2025 – o 45- day notice was sent to the Glendale Community Council informing them of the petition. The 45-day input and comment period began. o Early notification was sent to property owners within 300 feet of the applicant’s property. November 5, 2025 – o Signs posted on Fortune Road notifying the public of the proposed vacation. o Project posted to the City’s Online Open House webpage for public comments. No comments have been received as of the writing of this report. December 14, 2025 – 45-day comment period ended. December 31, 2025 – o Planning Commission agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. o Public hearing notice posted on City and State websites. January 2, 2026 – Planning Commission public notice signs posted along Fortune Road. January 14, 2026 - The Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation to the City Council to approve the street vacation request. February 11, 2026 – Draft ordinance sent to the Attorney’s Office. April 1, 2026 – Final ordinance received from the Attorney’s Office. April 6, 2026 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. STREET CLOSURE PROCESS The street closure process is dictated by Section 10-9a-609.5 Utah State Code which is included below for reference. 10-9a-609.5. Petition to vacate a public street. (1)In lieu of vacating some or all of a public street through a plat or amended plat in accordance with Sections 10-9a-603 through 10-9a-609, a legislative body may approve a petition to vacate a public street in accordance with this section. (2)A petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement shall include: (a)the name and address of each owner of record of land that is: (i)adjacent to the public street or municipal utility easement between the two nearest public street intersections; or (ii)accessed exclusively by or within 300 feet of the public street or municipal utility easement; (b)proof of written notice to operators of utilities and culinary water or sanitary sewer facilities located within the bounds of the public street or municipal utility easement sought to be vacated; and (c)the signature of each owner under Subsection (2)(a) who consents to the vacation. (3)If a petition is submitted containing a request to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall hold a public hearing in accordance with Section 10-9a- 208 and determine whether: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)the public interest or any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. (4)The legislative body may adopt an ordinance granting a petition to vacate some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement if the legislative body finds that: (a)good cause exists for the vacation; and (b)neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the vacation. Page | 5 (5)If the legislative body adopts an ordinance vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement, the legislative body shall ensure that one or both of the following is recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the land is located: (a)a plat reflecting the vacation; or (b)(i)an ordinance described in Subsection (4); and (ii)a legal description of the public street to be vacated. (6)The action of the legislative body vacating some or all of a public street or municipal utility easement that has been dedicated to public use: (a)operates to the extent to which it is vacated, upon the effective date of the recorded plat or ordinance, as a revocation of the acceptance of and the relinquishment of the municipality's fee in the vacated public street or municipal utility easement; and (b)may not be construed to impair: (i)any right-of-way or easement of any parcel or lot owner; (ii)the rights of any public utility; or (iii)the rights of a culinary water authority or sanitary sewer authority. (7)(a)A municipality may submit a petition, in accordance with Subsection (2), and initiate and complete a process to vacate some or all of a public street. (b)If a municipality submits a petition and initiates a process under Subsection (7)(a): (i)the legislative body shall hold a public hearing; (ii)the petition and process may not apply to or affect a public utility easement, except to the extent: (A)the easement is not a protected utility easement as defined in Section 54-3-27; (B)the easement is included within the public street; and (C)the notice to vacate the public street also contains a notice to vacate the easement; and (iii)a recorded ordinance to vacate a public street has the same legal effect as vacating a public street through a recorded plat or amended plat. (8)A legislative body may not approve a petition to vacate a public street under this section unless the vacation identifies and preserves any easements owned by a culinary water authority and sanitary sewer authority for existing facilities located within the public street. STREET VACATION –FORTUNE RD PLNPCM2025-00864 City Council Briefing April 21, 2026 Thatcher Chemical Company has requested that the City vacate a portion of Fortune Road, from approximately 2040 Fortune Road to the intersection at Wallace Road. REQUEST LOCATION & CONTEXT Salt Lake City // Planning Division LOCATION & CONTEXT Salt Lake City // Planning Division Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning •Transportation, Public Utilities, Urban Forestry, and Police had no issues with the request •Fire - Street needs to remain a Fire Access road, with Fire approved access gate. Fire hydrant maintained and accessible, •Engineering - Any utility in the vacated right-of-way will need an easement to city engineering •Real Estate Services – next steps: Applicant will need to follow the vacation process: the applicant will provide an appraisal and determine the fair market value of the right of way. The applicant can then purchase the vacated portion of the right-of-way and consolidate the parcels to comply with zoning. DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning •Staff finds that this petition complies with the Standards outlined in the City Council Street Closure Policy and Utah State Code 10-8-8 STANDARDS Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning The Planning Commission recommended approval of this petition, with the following conditions, at the January 14, 2026 meeting: •The applicant shall pay fair-market value for the right of way •The lots shall be consolidated with the portion of the vacated street so that no parcel is landlocked or without public street frontage. •Any private utilities installed within the proposed vacated right-of-way must be granted easements for access to the City Engineering Department •The road should be maintained as a fire access, with a fire-approved gate, per the department RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Salt Lake City // Planning Division Cassie Younger // Senior Planner Cassie.Younger@slcgov.com SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 04/01/2026 Date Sent to Council: 04/06/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Younger, Cassie E-mail Casisie.Younger@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 04/06/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 04/06/2026 Subject: Partial Street Vacation of Fortune Road Additional Staff Contact: Kelsey Lindquist, kelsey.lindquist@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Cassie Younger and Kelsey Lindquist Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: To approve the partial vacation with conditions Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Early Notification -A 45-day notice was sent to the Glendale Community Council on October 30, 2025. The Council responded with a letter of support for the vacation.-Property owners within 300 feet were sent a mailer notification of the petition on October 30, 2025.-Early notification signs were posted on the subject properties by the applicant on November 5, 2025.-The project was posted to the Online Open House webpage on November 5, 2025. It remains active. No public comments were received. Planning Commission- Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted (6:1) to forward a positive recommendation with conditions on January 14, 2026. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Thatcher Company, Inc, has submitted a petition for the City to vacate a portion of Fortune Road, from approximately 2040 Fortune Road to the intersection at Wallace Road. Thatcher Company owns all of the land adjacent to the proposed vacation. Thatcher Company is a chemical manufacturer and distributor that has been located at these properties for several decades. Thatcher is requesting the vacation of this street to restrict access to its properties, thereby increasing public safety. Because Thatcher is the only property owner along this portion of Fortune Road, and the road terminates at their site, there is already minimal public use of this street. This section of road is used primarily by Thatcher employees and customers and effectively functions as a private roadway rather than a public street. The total area of the portion of the proposed vacated street is approximately 950 feet long and contains 46,827 square feet. If the vacation is approved by Council, the property owner would be required to pay fair market value for the land. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request on January 14, 2026, and voted (6:1) to forward a positive recommendation to the City Council with the following conditions: 1. The lots shall be consolidated with the portion of the vacated street so that no parcel is landlocked or without public street frontage. 2. Any private utilities installed within the proposed vacated right-of-way must be granted easements for access to the City Engineering Department. 3. The road should be maintained as a fire access, with a fire-approved gate, per the department comments in Attachment F in the Staff Report, and the fire hydrant shall remain active and accessible. Council Policy After the Planning Commission, the Planning Staff added the following condition to the ordinance in order to align with Council policy: 4. Payment of the fair market value of the right-of-way property shall be made to the City, based upon the value added to the abutting property. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification o A 45-day notice was sent to the Glendale Community Council on October 30, 2025. The Council responded with a letter of support for the vacation. o Property owners within 300 feet were sent a mailer notification of the petition on October 30, 2025. o Early notification signs were posted on the subject properties by the applicant on November 5, 2025. o The project was posted to the Online Open House webpage on November 5, 2025. It remains active. No public comments were received. • Planning Commission o Planning Commission held a public hearing and voted (6:1) to forward a positive recommendation with conditions on January 14, 2026. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of January 14, 2026 b) PC Minutes of January 14, 2026 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of January 14, 2026 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2026 (Vacating a portion of Fortune Road between 2040 Fortune Road and Wallace Road) An ordinance vacating a portion of Fortune Road between 2040 Fortune Road and Wallace Road pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00864. WHEREAS the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 14, 2026 to consider a request made by Thatcher Company Inc. (“Applicant”) to vacate a portion of Fortune Road between 2040 Fortune Road and Wallace Road; and WHEREAS, at its January 14, 2026 meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Vacating City-Owned Right-of-Way. That a portion of Fortune Road located between 2040 Fortune Road and Wallace Road, which is the subject of Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00864, and which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto 2 (“Right-of-Way”), hereby is vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the Right-of-Way, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Conditions. This vacation is conditioned upon the following: 1. The Applicant shall pay fair market value of the Right-of-Way to the City, based upon the value added to the abutting property. 2. The Applicant shall consolidate parcels 15-10-351-006-0000 (1942 W Fortune Rd), 15- 10-351-005-0000 (2040 W Fortune Rd), 15-10-352-012-0000 (1975 W Fortune Rd), 15- 10-352-008-0000 (1947 W Fortune Rd), and 15-10-353-001-0000 (1905 W Fortune Rd). 3. The Applicant shall grant an access easement to any private utility provider that has facilities installed within the Right-of-Way as required by the applicable franchise agreements. 4. The Applicant shall grant the City a fire access easement so that the Right-of-Way is maintained as a fire access, with a fire-approved gate, and the fire hydrant shall remain active and accessible. SECTION 4. Time. If the conditions set forth in Section 3 above have not been met within one year after adoption, then this ordinance shall become null and void. Within such one 3 year period the City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the conditions identified above. SECTION 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the conditions set forth in Section 3 are satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. When the publication conditions have been met this ordinance shall likewise be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2026. ______________________________ Alejandro Puy, Council Chair  ATTEST: ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2026 Published: ______________. Ordinance Vacating Portion of Fortune Road APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___March 31, 2026__________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Legal description of Portion of Fortune Road to be vacated: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF FORTUNE ROAD WHICH IS NORTH 404.93 FEET, WEST 1371.08, N48°06'08"W 35.68 FEET AND N48°06'08"W 484.90 FEET FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 10, T1S, R1W, S.L.B.& M. THENCE N48°06'08"W 936.59 FEET; THENCE N41°53'52"E 50.00 FEET; THENCE S48°06'08"E 936.59 FEET; THENCE S41°53'52"W 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINS 46,827.7 SQUARE FEET OR 1.075 ACRES. This page has intentionally been left blank PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00864 September 2, 2025 Street vacation petition was received September 18, 2025 Petition PLNPCM2025-00864 was assigned to Cassie Younger, Senior Planner. The Planner reached out to the applicant to obtain additional information in order to consider the application complete. October 30, 2025 The 45-day notice was sent to the relevant Recognized Community Organization, which included the Glendale Community Council. The early engagement period officially began. November 3, 2025 The application was routed internally for department comments. November 5, 2025 Signs were posted along Fortune Road to notify the public of the proposed vacation. Project posted on the City’s Online Open House webpage to solicit public comments. None received December 14, 2025 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended. December 31, 2025 Planning Commission Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. Public hearing posted on City and State website. January 2, 2026 Signs were posted along Fortune Road to notice the public hearing January 9, 2026 Planning Commission Staff Report was posted. January 14, 2026 Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation to City Council February 11, 2026 Draft Ordinance sent to the Attorney’s Office April 1, 2025 Final Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00864 for a Street Vacation for a portion of Fortune Road. Thatcher Company Inc, has initiated a petition to vacate a portion of Fortune Road, from approximately 2040 Fortune Road to the intersection at Wallace Road. Thatcher Company owns all land adjacent to the proposed street vacation. If the street vacation is approved, the right-of-way would then be sold to the petitioners at fair market value and incorporated into their private property. As part of the process, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: TBD PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slc.gov. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Cassie Younger at 801-535-6211 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at cassie.younger@slc.gov The application details can be accessed at www.slcpermits.com by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-00864 The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at https://aca-prod.accela.com/SLCREFcouncil.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank Thatcher Company, Inc. Street Vacation Letter 11 u . 2025 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 0 P.O. Box 27407 • Salt Lake City, UT 84127 • 801-972-4587 Street Vacation Letter Introduction/Background Thatcher Company, Inc. (“Thatcher”) is requesting a street vacation of a segment of West Fortune Road in Salt Lake City. The anticipated street segment includes everything north of South Wallace Road to the segment termination at Thatcher’s property 2040 West Fortune Road (just south of I-215). All parcels adjacent to this street are owned by Thatcher. These parcels are utilized as part of a chemical manufacturing, storage and distribution campus where a variety of chemicals are handled. Upon approval of this street vacation petition, Thatcher will petition for a consolidation of all the parcels adjacent to and including this street. Policy Considerations Thatcher believes transference of right-of-way of the proposed section of West Fortune Road to Thatcher meets policy consideration 14.52.020.A regarding lack of use. This is a closed-end street fully surrounded by and terminating at the Thatcher campus. As such the property is unusable as a public right-of-way. Additionally, with the ownership of the subject street Thatcher would be able to significantly increase site access control, monitoring and security. One primary public access point could replace six of the existing access gates. The picture below shows where existing access points are and where the new entry would be. Since hazardous materials are handled onsite, safety and security are a top priority for Thatcher and for the public interest. Satellite image of subject segment of West Fortune road (green) showing existing Thatcher site entry gates (red) and singe future potential access point (blue) to limit access. Factors Considered The following factors are taken from the 14.52.030 Salt Lake City ordinance with discourse from Thatcher on how these factors were considered and/or addressed. 1. All other relevant City departments have no objection to the proposal. Thatcher participated in a pre-submittal meeting on September 26, 2024 with the planning staff and in a DRT meeting on October 17, 2024. No objection was given during these preliminary meetings. If any concerns arise, Thatcher will work with all relevant departments to ensure they are resolved. 2. The petition meets at least one of the policy considerations stated [in Ordinance 14.52.020]. Thatcher Company, Inc. Street Vacation Letter 11 u . 2025 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 0 P.O. Box 27407 • Salt Lake City, UT 84127 • 801-972-4587 See Policy Considerations section above. 3. The vacation will not deny access or parking to any adjacent property. Thatcher owns all adjacent properties and there are no easements through the area for adjacent properties. 4. The vacation will not result in any property being landlocked. Thatcher is anticipating approval to consolidate all the adjacent properties so no parcels will be landlocked. This petition will be initiated upon approval of this street vacation petition. 5. The vacation will not result in a use of the alley property which is otherwise contrary to the policies and goals of the City. Thatcher anticipates the street parcel to continue to operate as a road indefinitely. It is anticipated to be rezoned to match the zoning of the adjacent properties. The area is zoned as M-1 (Light Manufacturing District). Thacher company is operating on the property as legal nonconforming as a heavy industrial facility. West fortune road (yellow) as seen on Salt Lake City Zoning Map. 6. No abutting property owner intends to build a garage requiring access from the alley; Not applicable as Thatcher owns all adjacent parcels. 7. The petition is for an entire alley, rather than a small segment of it. Yes, it is for the entire street going NW from the intersection of Wallace Rd and Fortune Rd. 8. The alley is not necessary for actual or potential rear access to residences or for accessory use. Thatcher owns all adjacent properties and there are no rear accesses to other properties through the area. FO R T U N E R O A D ( P O R T I O N T O B E V A C A T E D ) BE G I N N I N G A T A P O I N T O N T H E S O U T H W E S T E R L Y L I N E O F F O R T U N E R O A D W H I C H I S N O R T H 4 0 4 . 9 3 FE E T , W E S T 1 3 7 1 . 0 8 , N 4 8 ° 0 6 ' 0 8 " W 3 5 . 6 8 F E E T A N D N 4 8 ° 0 6 ' 0 8 " W 4 8 4 . 9 0 F E E T F R O M T H E S O U T H Q U A R T E R CO R N E R O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T 1 S , R 1 W , S . L . B . & M . TH E N C E N 4 8 ° 0 6 ' 0 8 " W 9 3 6 . 5 9 F E E T ; TH E N C E N 4 1 ° 5 3 ' 5 2 " E 5 0 . 0 0 F E E T ; TH E N C E S 4 8 ° 0 6 ' 0 8 " E 9 3 6 . 5 9 F E E T ; TH E N C E S 4 1 ° 5 3 ' 5 2 " W 5 0 . 0 0 F E E T T O T H E P O I N T O F B E G I N N I N G . CO N T A I N S 4 6 , 8 2 7 . 7 S Q U A R E F E E T O R 1 . 0 7 5 A C R E S . I N T E R S T A T E H I G H W A Y 215 N00°00'00"E - QUARTER SECTION LINE - 5304.18' F O R T U N E R O A D W A L L A C E R D. TO BE VACATED TO REMAIN F O R T U N E R O A D SO U T H Q U A R T E R C O R N E R S E C T I O N 1 0 T1 S , R 1 W , S . L . B . & M . FO U N D S A L T L A K E C O U N T Y MO N U M E N T NO R T H Q U A R T E R C O R N E R S E C T I O N 1 0 T1 S , R 1 W , S . L . B . & M . FO U N D S A L T L A K E C O U N T Y MO N U M E N T 25' 25' 50.00' N41°53'52"E P. O . B . 404.93' N 9 0 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 " W 1 3 7 1 . 0 8 ' (1 3 7 0 . 4 7 ' ) N4 8 ° 0 6 ' 0 8 " W 35 . 6 8 ' (1 5 . 8 1 ' ) 484.90' N48°06'08"W N 48°06'08" W 936 . 5 9 ' S 48°06'08" E 936 . 5 9 ' 50 . 0 0 ' S 4 1 ° 5 3 ' 5 2 " W N00°00'00"E DI S T A N C E O F R E C O R D ( ) D E N O T E S R E C O R D B E A R I N G A N D O R MA R K E D " T A T E 3 3 4 5 5 2 " SE T 3 0 " # 5 R E B A R W I T H P L A S T I C C A P AL I Q U O T C O R N E R A S D E S C R I B E D FO U N D C O R N E R B Y O T H E R S P . O . B . P O I N T O F B E G I N N I N G TH A T C H E R C O M P A N Y 20 2 5 1o f 1 AS S H O W N 4- A U G - 2 0 2 5 55 2 RE C O R D O F SU R V E Y FO R T U N E R O A D Po r t i o n t o b e V a c a t e d In S e c t i o n 1 0 , T 1 S , R 1 W , S . L . B . & M . Sa l t L a k e C o u n t y , Sa l t L a k e C i t y , U t a h D E F G H I J K L A B C 4 5 6 7 8 9123 987654321 L K J I H G F E D C B A GE N E R A L N O T E S TH E B E A R I N G B A S E F O R T H I S S U R V E Y I S O R I E N T E D T O T H E N O R T H - S O U T H CE N T E R S E C T I O N L I N E B E T W E E N T H E S O U T H A N D N O R T H Q U A R T E R C O R N E R S O F SE C T I O N 1 0 , T 1 S , R 1 W , S . L . B . & M . A S S H O W N SU R V E Y O R N O T E S FI E L D S U R V E Y C O N D U C T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 5 - F E B R U A R Y 2 0 2 6 AL L U T I L I T I E S S H O W N A R E F R O M O B S E R V E D E V I D E N C E A N D / O R P L A N S A N D DO C U M E N T S P R O V I D E D B Y T H E S I T E C O N T R A C T O R O R I N D I V I D U A L U T I L I T Y CO M P A N I E S . S O M E O F T H E P I P E M A T E R I A L A N D S I Z E S W E R E N O T K N O W N A S O F TH E D A T E O F T H E S U R V E Y . O T H E R U T I L I T Y L I N E S A N D S E R V I C E S T U B S T H A T WE R E N O T O B S E R V E D O R D I S C L O S E D M A Y E X I S T O N S I T E . SU R V E Y O R ' S C E R T I F I C A T E TH I S P L A T W A S P R E P A R E D F R O M F I E L D N O T E S O F A N A C T U A L S U R V E Y M A D E B Y M E OR U N D E R M Y S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T T H E S A M E I S T R U E A N D A C C U R A T E T O T H E BE S T O F M Y K N O W L E D G E A N D B E L I E F . T H I S P L A T I S I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H AP P L I C A B L E S T A N D A R D S O F P R A C T I C E . . DA T E O F P L A T 2 0 - F E B R U A R Y - 2 0 2 6 . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ RI C H A R D K . T A T E D A T E 1 C h a n g e P O B t o k e e p t u r n r a d i u s i n t h e S L C r o a d w a y 0 2 / 1 3 / 2 6 This page has intentionally been left blank OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATE OWN_ZIP BENDING RIVER ROAD LLC PO BOX 28508 ANAHEIM CA 92809 SALT LAKE COUNTY 2001 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 WESTERN STATES JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE PO BOX 1386 PAGE AZ 86040 JERRY SWITA 1955 W BENDING RIVER CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 AAA BARRICADE COMPANY, LLC PO BOX 96 LEHI UT 84043 THE GARCIA COMPANY,1925 W BENDING RIVER CT SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ROMERO BROTHERS INVESTMENTS, LLC 9757 S CANDLEWOOD CIR SANDY UT 84092 MIDDLETON LAND LLC 9547 S 500 W SANDY UT 84070 WINDING RIVER LLC 3009 DANALDA DR LOS ANGELES CA 90064 THATCHER COMPANY, INC PO BOX 27407 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84127 THATCHER COMPANY PO BOX 27407 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84127 UTAH DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 THATCHER COMPANY 1905 W FORTUNE RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 ACE INTERMOUNTAIN RECYCLING CENTER, LLC 180 S 100 W # 158 PLEASANT GROVE UT 84062 Current Occupant 1930 W BENDING RIVER CT Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1704 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1965 W BENDING RIVER CT Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1937 W BENDING RIVER CT Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1080 S WINDING RIVER CV Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1075 S WINDING RIVER CV Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1085 S WINDING RIVER CV Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 2040 W FORTUNE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1942 W FORTUNE RD REAR Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1900 W FORTUNE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1947 W FORTUNE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 2044 W CALIFORNIA AVE Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1975 W FORTUNE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1240 S WALLACE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 Current Occupant 1905 W FORTUNE RD Salt Lake City UT 84104 This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: Zoning Map Amendment at 1726 South Jefferson Street and 1750 South Jefferson Circle (Mansell Manor) PLNPCM2025-00690 The Council will be briefed about a proposal from the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (HASLC) to amend the zoning map for the parcel at 1726 South Jefferson Street and a portion of the parcel at 1750 South Jefferson Circle in City Council District Five. HASLC’s stated objective is to construct a multi-family development on the properties. Twenty two-bedroom townhomes on the properties would be demolished under the proposed plan. If demolished, the applicant would be required to replace the townhomes with units at a similar rental rate and would be required to provide relocation assistance to displaced tenants. No draft site plans have been submitted to date, though the applicant estimates 160-200 one- to three- bedroom units could be developed on the site. Exact unit count and configuration will be determined if the requested zoning map amendment is adopted by the Council. It is unknown at this point if the proposed units will be rentals or for sale. Currently the 1726 parcel is zoned MU-11 (Mixed-Use 11), and the 1750 parcel is zoned RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential) as shown in the images below. The Council is being asked to consider MU-8 (Mixed-Use 8) zoning on the subject properties. (It is worth noting that if the proposal is adopted the 1750 South Jefferson Circle parcel will be split zoned with the western portion MU-8 and the eastern side RMF-35. However, HASLC submitted a preliminary subdivision application to consolidate the MU-8 properties and the RMF-35 portion would become a separate lot.) The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its January 28, 2026 meeting and held a public hearing at which a representative of the Ballpark Community Council spoke expressing general support but Item Schedule: Page | 2 noted some nearby residents expressed concerns with potential increased density. The Commission voted 3:2 recommending the Council amend the zoning map for the subject properties to MU-8 rather than the applicant’s requested MU-5. (This will be discussed in the additional information section below.) Commissioners who were opposed did not say why they objected. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed zoning map amendments, determine if the Council supports moving forward with the proposal. POLICY QUESTIONS Area zoning maps with subject properties outlined in red. The applicant’s original proposed rezone area is on the left, and the updated area based on the Planning Commission’s MU-8 recommendation on the right. (Note: the portion of 1790 South West Temple outlined in the left image was removed following the Planning Commission’s recommendation because that property is already zoned MU-8.) Images courtesy of Salt Lake City Planning Division Page | 3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The applicant’s original proposal was to change zoning of the subject parcels to MU-5 (Mixed-Use 5). During the Commission’s discussions a suggestion was made to rezone the properties to MU-8, so they match zoning of properties to the south. The applicant is not opposed to the recommended change. It is important to note that if the zoning map amendment is adopted by the Council there is no guarantee the proposed development will be constructed. The property could be redeveloped with any use allowed within the zone or sold to another party. Any conditions included with rezoning the properties will be memorialized and recorded in a development agreement that runs with the land. The Council is only being asked to consider rezoning the property. Because zoning of a property can outlast the life of a building, any rezoning application should be considered on the merits of changing the zoning of that property, not simply based on a potential project. KEY CONSIDERATIONS Planning staff identified five key considerations related to the proposal which are found on pages 4-8 of the Planning Commission staff report and summarized below. For the complete analysis, please see the staff report. Consideration 1 – How the Proposal Helps Implement City Goals and Policies Identified in Adopted Plans Planning staff found that the proposed zoning map amendment supports several initiatives in Plan Salt Lake (2015), Central Community Master Plan (2005), and Housing SLC: 2023-2027. It has the potential to add housing density, including affordable units, in a neighborhood with existing infrastructure. Consideration 2 – Comparison of Zones The current RMF-35 and MU-11 zoning districts along with the proposed MU-8 district all allow a variety of housing types, though there are differences between the zones. A primary difference between the zones is allowed height. RMF-35 allows up to 35 feet, MU-8 45- 90 feet (depending on building form), and MU-11 structures can be between 45-125 feet, again depending on building form. A table comparing the three zones is included below. Consideration 3 – Proposed Community Benefit HASLC proposes 15% of future units in a development would be offered to those earning 80% AMI or below. Based on an estimate of 160-200 units, there would be 24-30 new affordable units. (These would be in addition to the 20 units proposed to be demolished that would need to be replaced.) Planning staff found that the community benefit meets requirements. Details of the community benefit would be recorded in a development agreement with the City. Consideration 4 – Neighborhood Impacts Planning staff analyzed impacts to the neighborhood based on HASLC’s original requested MU-5 zoning. They found that because the subject properties are located between MU-11 properties to the west and north, and R-1/5,000 properties to the east, MU-5 zoning would provide a transition between more intense uses and low-density residential. HASLC stated they intend to construct buildings that meet MU-5 standards so they would not have more impact on surrounding properties. However, as noted above, if the zoning amendment is approved, any structures allowed under MU-8 could be built. Page | 4 Consideration 5 – Existing Housing Replacement & Tenant Relocation Assistance As discussed above, 20 affordable housing units are proposed to be demolished as part of the proposed housing development. City code calls for the demolished units to be replaced with the same number of bedrooms and rented at the same amount. There is an option for the developer to make a payment toward the City’s affordable housing fund. Tenant relocation assistance is also required which includes moving expenses, and application fees for replacement housing. If tenants move to other HASLC properties within the city relocation assistance is not required. Because HASLC proposes 15% of units in a new development as its community benefit, Planning staff recommended not allowing affordable housing incentives for those units. Additional affordable units beyond the proposed 15%, those units could utilize AHI if the qualify under City code. ZONING DISTRICT COMPARISON Attachment D to the Planning Commission staff report (page 29) includes a table comparing the existing and originally proposed MU-5 zoning districts. The following table compares existing and currently proposed MU-8 zoning districts. MU-8 (Proposed)MU-11 (Existing at 1726 S Jefferson St.) RMF-35 (Existing at 1750 S Jefferson Cir.) Building Forms -Row house -Multi-family residential, storefront and vertical mixed-use. -Row house - Multi-family residential, storefront and vertical mixed-use. -Urban house, two-family dwelling, and cottage development -Row house -Multi-family residential Uses Allowed Residential (building forms listed above), bar establishment, offices, clinic, restaurants, theater, among many others -Residential, adaptive reuse, governmental facility -No commercial uses (except with adaptive reuse) Height Range depends on building form 45-90 feet 45-125 feet 35 feet Front & Corner Setbacks Range depends on building form 0-20 feet 5-20 feet 10-20 feet Interior Setbacks Range depends on building form and abutting zoning district 0-10 feet 4-10 feet 4-10 feet Rear Setbacks Range depends on building form and abutting zoning district 0-20 feet 0-20 feet 10-15 feet Off-street Parking All properties lie within the Neighborhood Center context,” between ½ mile and ¾ mile from fixed rail transit Page | 5 Analysis of Standards Attachment E (pages 30-34) of the Planning Commission staff report outlines zoning map amendment and community benefit standards that should be considered as the Council reviews this proposal. The standards and findings are summarized below. Please see the Planning Commission staff report for additional information. Factor Finding Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with and helps implement the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the city as stated through its various adopted planning documents. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance. Complies The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent and nearby properties due to the change in development potential and allowed uses that do not currently to the property. Complies Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards. Complies The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including, but not limited to, roadways, parks and recreational facilities, police and fire protection, schools, stormwater drainage systems, water supplies, and wastewater and refuse collection. Some City public facilities and services may need to be upgraded. The status of existing transportation facilities, any planned changes to the transportation facilities, and the impact that the proposed amendment may have on the City’s ability, need, and timing of future transportation improvements. Complies The proximity of necessary amenities such as parks, open space, schools, fresh food, entertainment, cultural facilities, and the ability of current and future residents to access these amenities without having to rely on a personal vehicle. Complies The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. Complies The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the Complies (displaced tenants Page | 6 proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. will qualify for relocation assistance) The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. Complies The community benefits that would result from the proposed map amendment as identified in 21A.50.050.C 15% of units are proposed to be available to those earning 80% AMI or below. City Department Review During City review of the petitions, no responding departments or divisions expressed concerns with the proposal but stated additional review and permits would be required if the properties are redeveloped. Some offsite utility improvements may need to be made which have the potential to increase development costs. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY • July 21, 2025 – Petition for zoning map amendment received by Planning Division. • July 30, 2025 – Petition assigned to Cassie Younger, Senior Planner. • August 5, 2025 – o Notice sent to Midtown Business and Ballpark Community Council. o Notice sent to property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the subject properties. • August 11, 2025 – 45-day notice posted on the properties by the applicant. • September 19, 2025 – 45-day comment period ended. • December 3, 2025 – Housing Authority provided details of the proposed community benefit. • January 8, 2026 – Applicant presented at Ballpark Community Council. • January 15, 2026 – o Planning Commission agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. o Notice of public hearing posted on City and State websites and distributed via Planning Division listserv. • January 15, 2026 – Planning Commission public hearing notice posted on the property. • January 28, 2026 – Planning Commission public hearing. The Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation for MU-8, with conditions outlined above, to the City Council for the proposed zoning map amendment. • February 11, 2026 – Draft ordinance sent to City Attorney’s Office. • April 2, 2026 – Planning received final ordinance from the Attorney’s Office. Page | 7 • April 3, 2026 – Transmittal received in City Council Office. Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning City Council Briefing April 21, 2026 PLNPCM2025-00690 MANSELL MANOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning REQUEST The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City requests a rezone of the following properties •1726 Jefferson St (MU-11) •1750 Jefferson Cir (portion) (RMF-35) •20 existing 2-bedroom units on property •Existing properties have many zones on them •Preliminary Subdivision to consolidate these parcels for uniformity and development ease Salt Lake City //Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning BACKGROUND INFORMATION Original Request The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City requests a rezone of the following properties to MU-5 Updated Ordinance: Following the Planning Commission’s recommendation to rezone to MU-8 instead, 1790 West Temple is eliminated from the ordinance Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning MU-8 ZONE Single & Two–family Not Permitted Row House Max height: 45’ Front / Corner setback: 10-20’ Rear: 10’ -20’ Max height: 90’ 75’+ with Design Review Front and Corner setback: 5-20’ Rear: 0-20’ Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning ZONE COMPARISON TABLE RMF-35 MU-8 MU-11 MU-8 Proposed Zone RMF-35 Existing zone MU-11 Existing Zone Height 90’ 35’ 125’ Front & Corner Setbacks 0-20 10-20 5-20’ Building forms - Row house - Multi-family, storefront, and vertical mixed use -Urban house, two-family dwelling, and cottage development -Row house -Multi-family - Row house -Multi-family, storefront, and vertical mixed use Uses Residential + Commercial Residential (Commercial allowed thru adaptive reuse) Residential + Commercial Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning 15% of the future units will be rented or sold to those making 80% AMI or below This process happens through a Development Agreement and would run with the land Development plans are not required for a rezone petition. The applicant anticipates between 160-200 units, with a mix of one, two and three-bedroom units COMMUNITY BENEFIT Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning Per 21A.50.050.D, Tenant relocation shall be provided by the property owner to the tenants, including application fees and moving stipend. At least 20 units on the property shall be built with 2- bedrooms each at similar rent as existing units TENANT RELOCATION & HOUSING REPLACEMENT Salt Lake City // Planning Division www.slc.gov/planning On January 28, 2026, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the map amendment for the MU-8 Zone, with the following Conditions: 1. At least 15% of the units on the Property shall be rented or sold to those with incomes at 80% AMI or below. 2. At least 20 units on the Property shall be built with at least 2 bedrooms each. These units shall initially be rented at the same rental rate as the demolished units with no more than 3% annual increase on the rental rate for a period of 20 years. These units cannot be counted towards the 15% required by Condition 1. 3. Tenant relocation assistance shall be provided by the property owner to the tenants displaced by the demolition of the existing residential dwelling units on the Property in accordance with subsection 21A.50.050.D. 4. The 15% affordable units required by Condition 1 cannot be applied towards the eligibility requirements of any future Affordable Housing Zoning Incentives applications to the City. Additional affordable housing beyond that which is provided pursuant to Conditions 1 and 2 may be eligible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS Cassie Younger // Senior Planner Cassie.Younger@slc.gov SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 04/02/2026 Date Sent to Council: 04/03/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Younger, Cassie E-mail Cassie.Younger@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 04/03/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 04/03/2026 Subject: Mansell Manor Zoning Map Amendment Additional Staff Contact: Kelsey Lindquist, kelsey.lindquist@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Cassie Younger, Kelsey Lindquist Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: To approve the zoning map amendment with the following conditions: 1. At least 15% of the units on the Property shall be rented or sold to those with incomes at 80% AMI or below. 2. The 15% affordable units required by Condition 1 cannot be applied towards the eligibility requirements of any future Affordable Housing Zoning Incentives applications to the City. Additional affordable housing beyond that which is provided pursuant to Conditions 1 and 2 may be eligible. 3. At least 20 units on the Property shall be built with at least 2 bedrooms each. These units shall initially be rented at the same rental rate as the demolished units with no more than a 3% annual increase on the rental rate for a period of 20 years. These units cannot be counted towards the 15% required by Condition 1. 4. Tenant relocation assistance shall be provided by the property owner to the tenants displaced by the demolition of the existing residential dwelling units on the Property in accordance with subsection 21A.50.050.D. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process Early Notification period – •The Ballpark Community Council and the Midtown Business District were sent a formal notice requesting input on August 5, 2025• Mailers were sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property on August 5, 2025• An Open House blogpost was posted on the Planning Division website on August 6, 2025• A sign was posted on the subject property on August 11, 2025• The applicant presented at the Ballpark Community Council on January 8, 2026 Planning Commission• The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation with conditions on January 28th, 2026. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Housing Authority of Salt Lake City is requesting a zoning map amendment for 1726 Jefferson Street and a portion of 1750 Jefferson Circle. Currently, the land is used for storage, offices, and housing. The current zoning is split between MU-11 (Mixed-Use 11) and RMF-35 (Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential). The applicant is seeking to rezone the properties to MU-8 (Mixed-Use 8) to enable a multi- family development. The applicant has not provided details on the proposed development at this time. Background The applicant’s original request was a zoning change to MU-5 (Mixed Use 5) and included a portion of 1790 S West Temple (see image below). After deliberation, the Planning Commission determined that MU-8 was a more appropriate zoning district for the properties. The Commission voted (3:2) to alter the request from MU-5 to MU-8. Because this portion of property was already zoned MU-8, it has been left out of the ordinance. The original proposed rezone area outlined in red The updated rezone area based on the recommendation Community Benefit The proposed Community Benefit for the project states that 15% of the developed units will be sold or rented at 80% AMI (Area Median Income) or below. No development plans have been submitted with the application; however, the applicant estimates that 160-200 units will be developed. Unit Replacement and Tenant Relocation Assistance Twenty two-bedroom units currently exist on the property. When these units are demolished, the applicant will be required to replace them with the same number of bedrooms and at a similar rent. The applicant is also required to provide tenant relocation assistance as outlined in 21A.55.050.D.4, which includes moving expenses and application fees for replacement housing. Planning Commission Planning Commission held a hearing on January 28, 2026, and voted (3:2) to recommend the zoning map amendment to MU-8 (Mixed Use 8) with the following conditions: 1. At least 15% of the units on the Property shall be rented or sold to those with incomes at 80% AMI or below. 2. The 15% affordable units required by Condition 1 cannot be applied towards the eligibility requirements of any future Affordable Housing Zoning Incentives applications to the City. Additional affordable housing beyond that which is provided pursuant to Conditions 1 and 2 may be eligible. 3. At least 20 units on the Property shall be built with at least 2 bedrooms each. These units shall initially be rented at the same rental rate as the demolished units with no more than a 3% annual increase on the rental rate for a period of 20 years. These units cannot be counted towards the 15% required by Condition 1. 4. Tenant relocation assistance shall be provided by the property owner to the tenants displaced by the demolition of the existing residential dwelling units on the Property in accordance with subsection 21A.50.050.D. PUBLIC PROCESS: Early Notification period – • The Ballpark Community Council and the Midtown Business District were sent a formal notice requesting input on August 5, 2025 • Mailers were sent to property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property on August 5, 2025 • An Open House blogpost was posted on the Planning Division website on August 6, 2025 • A sign was posted on the subject property on August 11, 2025 • The applicant presented at the Ballpark Community Council on January 8, 2026 Planning Commission • The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a positive recommendation with conditions on January 28th, 2026. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of January 28, 2026 b) PC Minutes of January 28, 2026 c) Planning Commission Staff Report of January 28, 2026 EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 1 SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2026 (Amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1726 S Jefferson St and a portion of 1750 S Jefferson Circle from MU-11 Mixed Use District 11 and RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to MU-8 Mixed-Use District 8) An ordinance amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1726 S Jefferson St and a portion of 1750 S Jefferson Circle from MU-11 Mixed Use District 11 and RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to MU-8 Mixed-Use District 8 pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025-00690. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (”Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on January 28, 2026, on an application submitted by the property owner, Housing Authority of Salt Lake City, to rezone certain property located at 1726 S Jefferson St, a portion of 1750 S Jefferson Circle, and a portion of 1790 S West Temple from MU-11 Mixed Use District 11, MU-8 Mixed Use District 8, and RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to MU-5 Mixed-Use District 5. WHEREAS, at its January 28, 2026, meeting, the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) to rezone the property located at 1726 S Jefferson St and a portion of 1750 S Jefferson Circle from MU-11 Mixed Use District 11 and RMF-35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to MU- 8 Mixed-Use District 8. The portion of 1790 S West Temple identified in the petition is already zoned MU-8 Mixed Use District 8. WHEREAS, after a public hearing on this matter, the City Council has determined that adopting this ordinance is in the city’s best interests. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: 2 SECTION 1. Amending the Zoning Map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts, shall be and hereby is amended to reflect that the property located at 1726 S Jefferson St and a portion of 1750 S Jefferson Circle, as more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto (“Property”), shall be and hereby is rezoned from from MU-11 Mixed Use District 11 and RMF- 35 Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District to MU-8 Mixed-Use District 8. SECTION 2. Condition. This ordinance is conditioned upon the owner(s) of the Property entering into a development agreement requiring: a. At least 15% of the units on the Property shall be rented or sold to those with incomes at 80% AMI or below. b. At least 20 units on the Property shall be built with at least 2 bedrooms each. These units shall initially be rented at the same rental rate as the demolished units with no more than a 3% annual increase on the rental rate for a period of 20 years. These units cannot be counted towards the 15% required by Condition 2a. c. Tenant relocation assistance shall be provided by the property owner to the tenants displaced by the demolition of the existing residential dwelling units on the Property in accordance with subsection 21A.50.050.D. d. The 15% affordable units required by Condition 2a cannot be applied towards the eligibility requirements of any future Affordable Housing Zoning Incentives applications to the City. Additional affordable housing beyond that which is provided pursuant to Conditions 2a and 2b may be eligible. 3 SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication. The Salt Lake City Recorder is instructed to not publish this ordinance until the condition set forth in Section 2 is satisfied as certified by the Salt Lake City Planning Director or his designee. SECTION 4. Time. If the condition set forth in Section 2 above has not been met within one year after adoption, then this ordinance shall become null and void. Prior to such one year period, the City Council may, for good cause shown, by resolution, extend the time period for satisfying the condition identified above. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 2026. ______________________________ Alejandro Puy, Council Chair  ATTEST: ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Bill No. ________ of 2026. Published: ______________. 1726 Jefferson St and 1750 S Jefferson Cir. to MU-8 APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___April 1, 2026____________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 4 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description of the Property 1726 Jefferson St (Parcel ID 15-13-426-008-0000) Parcel 1: (PARCEL No. 15-13-426-008) Beginning at a point 23 rods West of the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT, "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence West 9 rods; thence North 8.7 rods; thence East 9 rods; thence South 8.7 rods to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract also being described as: Beginning at a point South 89°55'44" West 384.54 feet from the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence South 89°55'44" West 150.39 feet; thence North 0°13'44" East 143.55 feet; thence North 89°55'44" East 150.39 feet to the West right of way of Jefferson Street; thence South 0°01'10" East along said West right of way 143.55 feet to the Point of Beginning A portion of 1750 S Jefferson Cir (Parcel ID 15-13-430-025-0000) Beginning at a point on the North line of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, 9 rods West of the Northeast corner of said lot and running thence South 174.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet to the South line of said Lot 13; thence along boundary of said Lot 13, 407.42 feet, more or less, to Grantor's West boundary line; thence North 287.10 feet; thence East 578 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion conveyed by that certain Warranty Deed recorded December 28, 1982 as Entry No. 3743279 in Book 5427 at Page 2598 and being more particularly described as follows: The Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Also less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 5 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane- RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. A portion of 1750 S Jefferson Cir (Parcel ID 15-13-430-026-0000) Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve 6 to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane- RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North 89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" This page has intentionally been left blank PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-00690 July 21, 2025 July 30 , 2025 August 5, 2025 August 6, 2026 August 11, 2025 Housing Authority of Salt Lake City submitted a Petition for a Zoning Map Amendment to MU-5 (Mixed Use District 5) Petition PLNPCM2025-00690 and assigned to Cassie Younger, Senior Planner, and accepted by the Salt Lake City Planning Division 45-day notice sent to the Midtown Business District and Ballpark Community Recognized Community Organizations. Property owners and residents within 300 feet of the subject property were notified by mail of the proposal Application was routed internally for department comments Project posted on the City’s Online Open House webpage to solicit public comments Signs were posted on the property by the applicant noticing the 45- day engagement period September 19, 2025 The 45-day public comment period for Recognized Organizations ended December 3, 2025 January 8, 2026 January 15, 2026 January 16, 2026 January 23, 2026 January 28, 2026 Housing Authority gave Staff details of the proposed Community Benefit in order to move forward with the Planning Commission The applicant presented at the Ballpark Community Council Planning Commission Agenda posted to the Planning Commission website and the State of Utah Public Notice webpage. Public hearing posted on City and State websites; distributed via Planning Division listserve Signs were posted on the subject property noticing the public hearing Planning Commission Staff Report was posted Planning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation of approval for the MU-8 (Mixed Use District 8) February 11, Draft Ordinance sent to the Attorney’s Office Final Ordinance received from Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-00690 for a Zoning Map Amendment for the following properties: 1726 Jefferson St and a portion of 1750 Jefferson Cir. The properties are owned by the Housing Authority of Salt Lake City. The existing zoning on the properties is MU-11 Mixed Use District 11 and RMF-35 Moderate Density Multifamily Residential. The proposed zone is for the MU-8 Mixed Use District 8. The proposed Community Benefit is 15% of the housing developed will be rented or sold to incomes with 80% AMI or below. No development plans have been submitted at this time. As part of the process, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: TBD PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slc.gov. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. “lanning” tab and entering the petition number This page has intentionally been left blank ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 1 PLANNING PROCESS // ZONING AMENDMENT ABOUT THE APPLICATION Thank you for your interest in submitting a Zoning Amendment application. The following packet will provide general information to get started on your project and guide you through the application process from start to finish. The package is broken down into three sections: Information about the application, a visual diagram of the application process, and the application form. We highly encourage you to work with our Planning staff prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding any of the information listed in this packet or to set up a pre-submittal meeting please contact us at zoning@slcgov.com or give us a call at 801.535.7757. PLANNING DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET ROOM 406 PO BOX 145480 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5480 SLC.GOV/PLANNING ZONING@SLCGOV.COM TEL 801-535-7757 1 2 3 Important Process Information Process Timeline Application Form Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 2 PURPOSE & INTENT OF THE PROCESS An amendment may be initiated to modify the text of the Zoning Ordinance or to change the designations or boundaries of the Zoning Map. The amendment process is not intended to relieve particular hardships nor to confer special privileges or rights upon any person, but only to make adjustments necessary in light of changed conditions or changes in public policy. WHO CAN INITIATE AN AMENDMENT? Applications for amendments may be initiated by the Mayor, the City Council, the Planning Commission, the Owner of the property included in the application, or the Property Owner’s Authorized Agent. CONSIDERATION FACTORS FOR AMENDMENTS (21A.50.050 ) A decision to amend the text of this title or the zoning map by general amendment is a matter committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard. A. In making its decision concerning a proposed text amendment, the City Council should consider the following factors: 1. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the City as stated through its various adopted planning documents; 2. Whether a proposed text amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance; 3. Whether a proposed text amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards; and 4. The extent to which a proposed text amendment implements best current, professional practices of urban planning and design. 5. The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on city resources necessary to carry out the provisions and processes required by this title. 6. The impact that the proposed text amendment may have on other properties that would be subject to the proposal and properties adjacent to subject properties. 7. The community benefits that would result from the proposed text amendment, 21A.50.050.C. B. In making a decision to amend the zoning map, the City Council should consider the following: 1. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the City as stated through its various adopted planning documents; 2. Whether a proposed map amendment furthers the specific purpose statements of the zoning ordinance; 3. The extent to which a proposed map amendment will affect adjacent properties; 4. Whether a proposed map amendment is consistent with the purposes and provisions of any applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards; and 5. The potential impacts on the City to provide safe drinking water, storm water, and sewer to the property and other properties based on the additional development potential of future development including any impact that may result in exceeding existing or planned capacities that may be located further away from the subject property. IMPORTANT PROCESS INFORMATION 21A.50 O R D I N A N C E Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 3 IMPORTANT PROCESS INFORMATION 21A.50 O R D I N A N C E 6. The status of existing transportation facilities, any planned changes to the transportation facilities, and the impact that the proposed amendment may have on the city’s ability, need, and timing of future transportation improvements. 7. The proximity of necessary amenities such as parks, open space, schools, fresh food, entertainment, cultural facilities, and the ability of current and future residents to access these amenities without having to rely on a personal vehicle. 8. The potential impacts to public safety resources created by the increase in development potential that may result from the proposed amendment. 9. The potential for displacement of people who reside in any housing that is within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. 10. The potential for displacement of any business that is located within the boundary of the proposed amendment and the plan offered by the petitioner to mitigate displacement. 11. The community benefits that would result from the proposed map amendment, as identified in 21A.50.050.C. COMMUNITY BENEFIT (21A.50.050.C) Every zoning text and zoning map amendment application must include a proposed community benefit and should demonstrate that the benefit would not otherwise be available without the proposed amendment. The proposed community benefit should be proportional to the increase in development potential should the amendment be adopted. The following are community benefits that could be proposed: • Housing: Provision of affordable or family-sized housing. • Dedication of Publicly Accessible Open Space: Dedication of open spaces accessible to the public. • Preservation of Critical Lands: Conservation or restoration of critical lands such as wetlands, river corridors, or wildlife habitats. • Historic Building Preservation: Safeguarding historic structures not already protected against demolition. • Support for Local Businesses: Inclusion of space for small businesses or charitable organizations within a development. • Expansion of Public Infrastructure: Enhancement of public infrastructure beyond what’s necessary for future development. Any community benefit that is required as a condition of approval of the amendment(s) would be secured through a Development Agreement. Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 4 TENANT DISPLACEMENT OBLIGATIONS (21A.50.050.D.4) If a proposal is expected to involve the demolition of any residential unit, the City Council may require the petitioner to provide relocation assistance to the current tenant(s). It is the responsibility of the applicant or property owner to ensure compliance with this requirement and provide proof that the obligation has been satisfied. The applicant can submit the evidence along with their application, or it may be required as a condition for approval determined by the City Council. All payments should be received by the tenant 24 hours in advance of leaving the unit to be demolished. Relocation assistance includes the following: • Moving expenses based on a reasonable estimate provided by the tenant, up to a maximum of $1,500. • Application fees for the replacement housing. • The deposit that the displaced tenant would have to pay to secure replacement housing. • Rental assistance payment based on the difference, if any, between the cost of the monthly rent of the demolished housing and a comparable unit. The rental payment total amount paid shall not be more than $7,200. DISCLAIMER: IF A HOUSING UNIT IS DEMOLISHED OR NEGLECTED TO THE POINT OF BEING UNINHABITABLE AT ANY TIME DURING THE FIVE YEARS PRIOR TO A PETITION FOR A ZONING AMENDMENT BEING SUBMITTED OR IS PLACED ON THE CITY’S BOARDED BUILDING INVENTORY, THE CITY COUNCIL MAY REQUIRE THIS SECTION TO APPLY TO TENANTS THAT WERE DISPLACED BY THE DEMOLITION OR REQUIRE THE TENANT RELOCATION AMOUNT TO BE PAID TO THE CITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF OTHER TENANT RELOCATION ASSISTANCE. IMPORTANT PROCESS INFORMATION 21A.50 O R D I N A N C E DEMOLISHED UNIT REPLACEMENT (21A.50.050.E) The future development may be required to replace the demolished housing unit within the new development. The replacement housing unit should have the same number of bedrooms as the demolished unit. In addition, the applicant shall propose one of the options listed below: a. The replacement unit shall be rented at the same amount as the demolished unit with no more than a 3% annual increase on the rental rate for a period of 20 years. b. The applicant may propose a payment to the city in lieu of the rental restriction on the new unit to go toward the city’s housing fund to offset the loss of affordable housing. The payment shall be equal to the monthly rent of the unit prior to demolition multiplied by the number of months between the time the unit is vacated prior to demolition until a Certificate of Occupancy for the replacement dwelling is issued. CONSULTATION If you have questions regarding the Zoning Amendment regulations or process, please contact the Salt Lake City Planning Counter staff at zoning@slcgov.com or give us a call at 801-535-7757. If you would like to discuss your development plan in more detail, you can request a pre-submittal meeting with Planning staff by contacting the Planning Counter. Pre-submittal meetings are held on Thursdays in 30 minute slots between 1:30 and 3:30 pm. Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D 21 days 21 days 45 days CITY COUNCIL PROCESS City Council holds a briefing with staff during work session. Public hearing and action follows. Timeline determined by City Council office. www.slc.gov/council DISCLAIMER: APPLICATION TIME FRAMES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON CURRENT WORKLOAD AND COMPLEXITY OF APPLICATIONS. INCOMPLETE OR MISSING INFORMATION ON DRAWINGS AND APPLICATION FORMS WILL DELAY THE PROCESS. PROCESS TIMELINE PLANNING COMMISSION Public hearing scheduled, notices sent, staff report produced, and commission recommendation made. TRANSMITTAL OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOODS (CAN) Commission minute approval and public record are assembled by staff. After review, the package is transmitted to City Council. APPLICATION RECEIVED Application submitted and pre-screened to ensure submittal requirements are met and fees are paid. 1 2 4 3 6 PLANNER ASSIGNED Application reviewed by Planner to ensure complete documentation (if incomplete, the applicant will be provided a list of missing info to submit). PUBLIC NOTICE Public notices sent to nearby neighbors, property owners and Community Councils (when required by ordinance). Application routed to City Departments for review. APPLICATION MODIFICATIONS Modifications based on public input & City Department review comments (if needed, applicant must submit updates). Minor issues will be conditions of approval. Note: Significant issues may cause additional delays. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT Open House and/or Community Council presentation held. Note: The Planning Director has the discretion to extend the public engagement period, including additional public hearings on complex proposals. 6 - 12 MONTHS T I M E F R A M E 5 8 7 APPLICANT STAFF 14 days Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 6 CONSULTATION Available prior to submitting an application. For questions regarding the requirements, email us at zoning@slcgov.com. REQUIRED FEES • Map Amd: $1,262 filing fee, plus $121 per acre (in excess of 1 ac). • Text Amd: $1,262 filing fee. • Additional required notice fees assessed after submission. SUBMISSION Submit your application online through the Citizen Access Portal. Learn how to submit online by following the step-by-step guide. I M P O R T A N T I N F O R M A T I O N ZONING AMENDMENT DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT PLANNER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS. ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR STAFF ANALYSIS WILL BE COPIED AND MADE PUBLIC, INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL OR ENGINEERING DRAWINGS, FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC REVIEW BY ANY INTERESTED PARTY. Owner Contractor* Other*Architect* REQUEST CASE NUMBER MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN PROPERTY (*owner’s consent required) A P P L I C A N T I N F O R M A T I O N O F F I C E U S E ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY PROJECT NAME (OPTIONAL) RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (if different from applicant) EMAIL PHONE PHONE EMAIL IF OTHER, PLEASE LIST Mansell Manor Rezone and Lot Consolidation 1750 S Jefferson Circle, 1726 S Jefferson Circle, 1725 S Jefferson Street, 1790 S West Temple Street Rezone to MU-5 Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (801) 916 3571 1776 S West Temple dnackerman@haslcutah.org ssiabi@haslcutah.org Housing Authority of Salt Lake City (801) 487 2161 1776 S West Temple dnackerman@haslcutah.org Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 7 NAME OF OWNER EMAIL PHONEMAILING ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS APPLICATION TYPE A C K N O W L E D G M E N T O F R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y L E G A L P R O P E R T Y O W N E R C O N S E N T NAME OF APPLICANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY EMAIL SIGNATURE SIGNATURE DATE DATE 1. This is to certify that I am making an application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with all City requirements with regard to this request. This application will be processed under the name provided below. 2. By signing the application, I am acknowledging that I have read and understood the instructions provided for processing this application. The documents and/or information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the documents provided are considered public records and may be made available to the public. 3. I understand that my application will not be processed until the application is deemed complete by the assigned planner from the Planning Division. I acknowledge that a complete application includes all of the required submittal requirements and provided documents comply with all applicable requirements for the specific applications. I understand that the Planning Division will provide, in writing, a list of deficiencies that must be satisfied for this application to be complete and it is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the missing or corrected information. I will keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and the progress of this application. 4. I understand that a staff report will be made available for my review prior to any public hearings or public meetings. This report will be on file and available at the Planning Division and posted on the Division website when it has been finalized. If the applicant is not the legal owner of the property, a consent from property owner must be provided. Properties with a single fee title owner may show consent by filling out the information below or by providing an affidavit. Affirmation of sufficient interest: I hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. 1. If a corporation is fee titleholder, attach copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing the action. 2. If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner, attach copy of agreement authorizing action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. 3. If a Home Owner’s Association is the applicant then the representative/president must attach a notarized letter stating they have notified the owners of the proposed application. A vote should be taken prior to the submittal and a statement of the outcome provided to the City along with the statement that the vote meets the requirements set forth in the CC&Rs. DISCLAIMER: BE ADVISED THAT KNOWINGLY MAKING A FALSE, WRITTEN STATEMENT TO A GOVERNMENT ENTITY IS A CRIME UNDER UTAH CODE CHAPTER 76-8, PART 5. SALT LAKE CITY WILL REFER FOR PROSECUTION ANY KNOWINGLY FALSE REPRESENTATIONS MADE PERTAINING TO THE APPLICANT’S INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. Housing Authority of Salt Lake City dnackerman@haslcutah.org 1776 S West Temple (801) 916 3571 Rezone See Attached Exhibit "Zoning Amendment Overlay" Housing Authority of Salt Lake City dnackerman@haslcutah.org 1776 S West Temple Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D 7/1/2025 7/1/2025 ZONING AMENDMENT PROCESS PLANNING DIVISION | v7.1.24 8 A written description regarding the proposed community benefit(s) associated with the amendment. The description shall adequately describe the necessary details to demonstrate that the proposed community benefit is roughly proportionate to the potential increase in development right if the proposed amendment were to be adopted. See 21A.50.050.C for a list of community benefits that can be proposed. A statement declaring the purpose and justification for the proposed amendment. A written general description of any future development that is planned for the property including the anticipated use, density, scale of development, timing of development, the anticipated impact to existing land uses and occupants of the land subject to the proposal, and any additional land use petitions that may be anticipated to develop the site. Visual renderings and basic site plans may be provided by the applicant. Is the request amending the Zoning Map? If so, please list the parcel numbers to be changed and a map that shows the current use of the subject property and adjacent properties. Is the request amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance? If so, please include language and the reference to the Zoning Ordinance to be changed. Text that is proposed to be added shall be underlined and text that is proposed to be deleted shall be shown with a strikethrough line. REQUIREMENTS (21A.50) COMMUNITY BENEFIT (21A.50.050.C) SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please provide the following information with your application. Confirm that you have included each of the requirements listed below by adding a check mark for each item. I N C O M P L E T E I N F O R M A T I O N W I L L N O T B E A C C E P T E D INITIALS DISCLAIMER: I ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SALT LAKE CITY REQUIRES THE ITEMS ABOVE TO BE SUBMITTED BEFORE MY APPLICATION CAN BE PROCESSED. I UNDERSTAND THAT PLANNING WILL NOT ACCEPT MY APPLICATION UNLESS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. 1 / 1 CHECK STAFF DISCLAIMER: FILL OUT THE REQUIRED DATA COLLECTION INFORMATION BELOW BY USING THIS LINK. DO NOT UPLOAD THIS INFORMATION TO THE CITIZENS ACCESS PORTAL. https://bit.ly/slcplanning-datacollection For residential properties, the following information must be provided: • The current or prior number of dwellings; • Square footage and number of bedrooms for each dwelling unit; • The current cost of rent and the cost of rent for the previous 36 months; • The total number of people residing on the property. For nonresidential properties, the following information must be provided: • Details on the nature of the existing and prior use; • Square footage of the leasable area; • Detailed list of current or prior occupants; • The current cost to lease and the cost to lease for the previous 36 months. DATA COLLECTION (21A.50.040.A ) Docusign Envelope ID: 088F0AD8-7BC9-4F4F-A5EE-AFA9EC77501D SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS XX X SD SD SD SD SD CH A I N L I N K F E N C E X X X X X X X X X X X SD SD SD E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G SD SD W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E E E S WV EXIST. WATER VALVE X X X X X X X SD SD SD SD IRR E CHAIN LINK FENCE CHA I N L I N K F E N C E CH A I N L I N K F E N C E CHAIN LINK FENCE X X X EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING SHEDS EXISTING SHEDS WE S T T E M P L E S T R E E T (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) E SOUTHEAST CORNER LOT 12, BLOCK 7 FIVE ACRE PLAT A BIG FIELD SURVEY PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE SALT LAKE COUNTY SALT LAKE COUNTY SD SD G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G EXISTING POND E E E E E E E E E E T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G S5' W W W W W W W W 14" R C P 12" RCP 15" RCP 6" 36 " 6" 3" 52 . 2 8 ' EXISTING BUILDING NORTHEAST CORNER LOT 14, BLOCK 7 FIVE ACRE PLAT "A" BIG FIELD SURVEY BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S 0 0 ° 0 1 ' 1 0 " E 2 9 4 4 . 2 2 ' ( M E A S U R E D ) 2 9 4 2 . 3 3 ' ( R E C O R D ) G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SD SD X X X X X X X CH A I N L I N K F E N C E SHEDS SHEDS SHEDSCONCRETE PAD 8. 9 ' 9. 0 ' 40.9' 38.3'36.8' 16 . 5 ' W W W W W W W W W W HYD WV WV W HYD W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WV SS SS CO SS CO FW L SS SS SS CO CO SS SS CO SS SS CO W FW L SS SS SS CO SS SS CO CO COCOCO WV G G G G GGGGGGGGGG WV WV D X W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W W W VA N VA N XFMR XFMR XFM R XFM R XFM R D D D D DD RD DD D D RD RD RD DDD D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D DDDD D D D D D D D D D DDDD D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RDRD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RDRDRDRDRD RD RD RD RD RD RD HYD WV WV W W W W W WVWV WV G G G G OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P SHED DUMPSTER DUMPSTER DUMPSTER QUAYLE AVENUEASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT WATERWAY MONUMENT SIGNWATERWAY DD D D D D D D SDV SD V SD V SD V SD V SDV D SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD S S S S S SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS S EXIST. SSMH S EXIST. SSMH COMM EXIST. COMMS BOX B&C B&G 127636B&C LS 4814 571-7450 EXIST. GAS METEREXIST. LIGHT SINGLE 432 9" DIA NE EXIST. WATER SPGT EXIST. LIGHT DOUBLE DNC E EXIST. ELEC BOX 6" DIA ABANDOND B&C ENSIGN ENG. EXIST. GAS METER WMEXIST. WATER METER EXIST. ELEC POLE 10" DIA E-W-SW-NE EXIST. ELEC POLE 10" DIA E-W-N EXIST. IRR METER EXIST. UTIL GUY WIREEXIST. UTIL GUY WIREEXIST. ELEC POLE 8" N-S-E-W E EXIST. ELEC METER EXIST. ELEC POLE 12" E-W DNC EXIST. ELEC POLE 12" DIA E-W-SW XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X XX PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PA R C E L L I N E PARC E L L I N E PA R C E L L I N E PARCEL 1 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 6 PARCEL 5 JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) 11.1' 66.0' PARCEL 2 PARCEL No. 15-13-426-007 181 WEST MGT, LLC PARCEL No. 15-13-426-002 JEREMY NEFF PARCEL No. 15-13-430-025 HASLC PARCEL No. 15-13-430-017 MARY COX PARCEL No. 15-13-430-003 HASLC UT A T R A X R I G H T - O F - W A Y S 89°55'44" W 38.80' 44 9 . 4 4 ' C O N S O L I D A T I O N P A R C E L FENCE COR. IS 0.9' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.0' EAST OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.2' EAST OF PROP LINE POINT OF BEGINNING CONSOLIDATION PARCEL 15 8 . 0 3 ' FENCE COR. IS 1.0' WEST & 0.4' NORTH OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 0.8' EAST & 0.4' SOUTH OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 0.2' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 3.7' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 3.6' SOUTH & 1.7' WEST OF PROP COR. D EXIST. SDCO D EXIST. SDCO D EXIST. SDCO SD V EXIST. SD VAULT D EXIST. SDCO EXIST. SDCB SQR EXIST. SDCB SQR EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING FENCE END IS 4.0' WEST OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 4.0' WEST OF PROP LINE PARCEL No. 15-13-430-030 HASLCCU R B & G U T T E R SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K CU R B & G U T T E R CU R B & G U T T E R CU R B & G U T T E R WATERWAY CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING JEFFERSON CIRCLE (PRIVATE STREET) WEST 355.65' 318.79' CONTAINS:157,151 sq.ft. 3.608 acres CONSOLIDATION PARCEL N 89°55'43" E 308.92' SO U T H 2 8 7 . 1 0 ' S 89°55'44" W 99.43' N 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 3 " E 5 7 5 . 4 0 ' S 89°58'36" E 192.60' N 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 0 " E 1 4 3 . 5 5 ' S 89°58'36" E 148.50' S 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 0 " W 1 8 4 . 2 3 ' C1 C2 S 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 6 1 . 6 3 ' SHEP COR. IS 2.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE SHEP COR. IS 2.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE SHEP COR. IS 1.7' SOUTH OF PROP LINE PARCEL No. 15-13-430-035 HASLC CURVE TABLE CURVEC1 C2 RADIUS25.00' 50.00' LENGTH17.25' 149.44' DELTA39°32'21" 171°14'46" BEARINGS19°59'50"W S45°51'22"E CHORD16.91' 99.71' CALL BLUESTAKES @ 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.Know what's below.before you dig.Call R HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE 0 ( IN FEET ) HORZ: 1 inch = ft.40 40 20 40 80 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH DESIGNED BY PROJECT NUMBER FOR: PROJECT MANAGER PRINT DATE PHONE: CONTACT: WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM SANDY 45 W 10000 S, Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTON Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 5313D 1 OF 1 HA S L C C O N S O L I D A T I O N # 2 CO N S O L I D A T I O N S U R V E Y 17 2 6 S O U T H J E F F E R S O N S T R E E T SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H CONSOLIDATION SURVEY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY1776 SOUTH WEST TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, 84101 DANIEL NACKERMAN 801-509-0801 P. Harris B. Greenleaf 2025-06-06 ENSIGN ENG. LAND SURV. LEGEND WM HYD U D D S IRR swv WV W SS SW SD W IRR X LD SECTION CORNER MONUMENT EXIST REBAR AND CAP SET ENSIGN REBAR AND CAP WATER METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SECONDARY WATER VALVE IRRIGATION VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN COMBO BOX STORM DRAIN CULVERT SIGN ELECTRICAL BOX UTILITY MANHOLE UTILITY POLE LIGHT CABLE BOX TELEPHONE BOX GAS METER TREE SHRUB ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE DEED LINE TANGENT LINE EXIST DITCH FLOW LINE FENCE EDGE OF ASPHALT SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE LAND DRAIN LINE CULINARY WATER LINE SECONDARY WATER LINE IRRIGATION LINE OVERHEAD POWER LINE ELECTRICAL LINE GAS LINE EXISTING CONTOURS CONCRETE BUILDING PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT DENSE VEGETATION PREVENTING ACCESS FOR ACCURATE SURVEY E OHP E CABLE G NOTE: MAY CONTAIN SYMBOLS THAT ARE NOT USED IN THIS PLAN SET. STREET MONUMENT 1700 SOUTH STREET WEST TEMPLE STREET (FOUND 2" BRASS CAP) STREET MONUMENT 2100 SOUTH STREET WEST TEMPLE STREET (FOUND 2" BRASS CAP) H HARRIS EATT S UTA OF F PATRICK M. No. 286882 RO P ISSE N LAO OR SUR Y VE DANL 6/6/25 1700 SOUTH QUAYLE AVE LAYTON AVE VENTURE WAY RI C H A R D S S T R VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) MA I N S T WE S T T E M P L E SITE SURVEYOR'S NARRATIVE I, Patrick M. Harris do hereby state that I am a Professional Land Surveyor and that I hold certificate no. 286882 as prescribed by the laws of the State of Utah and represent that I have made a survey of the following described property. The Purpose of this survey is to provide a Consolidation Survey for use by the client. The Basis of Bearing is the line between a Street Monument at the Intersection of 1700 South Street and West Temple Street and a Street Monument at the Intersection of 2100 South Street and West Temple Street measuring South 0°01'10" East 2944.22 feet. COMMITMENT DESCRIPTIONS Parcel 1: (PARCEL No. 15-13-426-008) Beginning at a point 23 rods West of the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT, "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence West 9 rods; thence North 8.7 rods; thence East 9 rods; thence South 8.7 rods to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract also being described as: Beginning at a point South 89°55'44" West 384.54 feet from the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence South 89°55'44" West 150.39 feet; thence North 0°13'44" East 143.55 feet; thence North 89°55'44" East 150.39 feet to the West right of way of Jefferson Street; thence South 0°01'10" East along said West right of way 143.55 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 5: (PARCEL No. 15-13-430.025) Beginning at a point on the North line of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, 9 rods West of the Northeast corner of said lot and running thence South 174.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet to the South line of said Lot 13; thence along boundary of said Lot 13, 407.42 feet, more or less, to Grantor's West boundary line; thence North 287.10 feet; thence East 578 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion conveyed by that certain Warranty Deed recorded December 28, 1982 as Entry No. 3743279 in Book 5427 at Page 2598 and being more particularly described as follows: The Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Also less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane-RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 6: (PARCEL No. 15-13-430-026) Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane-RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North 89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONSOLIDATION PARCEL Beginning at a point on the south line of Jefferson Street Street said point being South 00°13'43" West 158.03 feet along the west line of West Temple Street and West 318.79 feet from the Southeast Corner of Lot 12, Block 7, Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey, said point also being South 00°01'10" East 449.44 feet along the center line of said West Temple Street and West 355.65 feet from a Street Monument at the Intersection of 1700 South Street and said West Temple Street and running: thence South 00°13'43" West 161.63 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 308.92 feet; thence South 287.10 feet; thence South 89°55'44" West 99.43 feet; thence North 00°13'43" East 575.40 feet; thence South 89°58'36" East 192.60 feet; thence North 00°13'40" East 143.55 feet; thence South 89°58'36" East 148.50 feet to a point on the west line of Jefferson Street; thence South 00°13'40" West 184.23 feet along said west line of said Jefferson Street; thence Southwesterly 17.25 feet along the arc of a 25.00 feet radius curve to the right (center bears North 89°46'20" West and the chord bears South 19°59'50" West 16.91 feet with a central angle of 39°32'21") along said west line of said Jefferson Street; thence Southeasterly 149.44 feet along the arc of a 50.00 feet radius curve to the right (center bears South 45°51'22" East and the chord bears South 45°51'22" East 99.71 feet with a central angle of 171°14'46") along said west line of said Jefferson Street to the point of beginning. Contains 157,151 sq. ft or 3.608 acres. __________ _________ ___________________________ Date Patrick M. Harris License No. 286882 6/06/25 SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS XX X SD SD SD SD SD CH A I N L I N K F E N C E X X X X X X X X X X X SD SD SD E E E E E E E E E E E E E E G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G SD SD W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E E E S WV EXIST. WATER VALVE X X X X X X X SD SD SD SD IRR E CHAIN LINK FENCE CHA I N L I N K F E N C E CH A I N L I N K F E N C E CHAIN LINK FENCE X X X EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING SHEDS EXISTING SHEDS WE S T T E M P L E S T R E E T (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) E SOUTHEAST CORNER LOT 12, BLOCK 7 FIVE ACRE PLAT A BIG FIELD SURVEY PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE SALT LAKE COUNTY SALT LAKE COUNTY SD SD G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G EXISTING POND E E E E E E E E E E T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T G S5' W W W W W W W W 14" R C P 12" RCP 15" RCP 6" 36 " 6" 3" 52 . 2 8 ' EXISTING BUILDING NORTHEAST CORNER LOT 14, BLOCK 7 FIVE ACRE PLAT "A" BIG FIELD SURVEY BA S I S O F B E A R I N G S 0 0 ° 0 1 ' 1 0 " E 2 9 4 4 . 2 2 ' ( M E A S U R E D ) 2 9 4 2 . 3 3 ' ( R E C O R D ) G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E SD SD X X X X X X X CH A I N L I N K F E N C E SHEDS SHEDS SHEDSCONCRETE PAD 8. 9 ' 9. 0 ' 40.9' 38.3'36.8' 16 . 5 ' W W W W W W W W W W HYD WV WV W HYD W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WV SS SS CO SS CO FW L SS SS SS CO CO SS SS CO SS SS CO W FW L SS SS SS CO SS SS CO CO COCOCO WV G G G G GGGGGGGGGG WV WV D X W W W W W W W WWW W W W W W W W W W VA N VA N XFMR XFMR XFM R XFM R XFM R D D D D DD RD DD D D RD RD RD DDD D D D DD D D D D D D D D D D D DDDD D D D D D D D D D DDDD D D D D D D D D DD D D D D D RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RDRD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RDRDRDRDRD RD RD RD RD RD RD HYD WV WV W W W W W WVWV WV G G G G OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P OH P SHED DUMPSTER DUMPSTER DUMPSTER QUAYLE AVENUEASPHALTASPHALTASPHALT WATERWAY MONUMENT SIGNWATERWAY DD D D D D D D SDV SD V SD V SD V SD V SDV D SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD S S S S S SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS S EXIST. SSMH S EXIST. SSMH COMM EXIST. COMMS BOX B&C B&G 127636B&C LS 4814 571-7450 EXIST. GAS METEREXIST. LIGHT SINGLE 432 9" DIA NE EXIST. WATER SPGT EXIST. LIGHT DOUBLE DNC E EXIST. ELEC BOX 6" DIA ABANDOND B&C ENSIGN ENG. EXIST. GAS METER WMEXIST. WATER METER EXIST. ELEC POLE 10" DIA E-W-SW-NE EXIST. ELEC POLE 10" DIA E-W-N EXIST. IRR METER EXIST. UTIL GUY WIREEXIST. UTIL GUY WIREEXIST. ELEC POLE 8" N-S-E-W E EXIST. ELEC METER EXIST. ELEC POLE 12" E-W DNC EXIST. ELEC POLE 12" DIA E-W-SW XXXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X XX PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PARCEL LINE PA R C E L L I N E PARC E L L I N E PA R C E L L I N E PARCEL 1 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 6 PARCEL 5 JE F F E R S O N S T R E E T (P U B L I C S T R E E T ) 11.1' 66.0' PARCEL 2 PARCEL No. 15-13-426-007 181 WEST MGT, LLC PARCEL No. 15-13-426-002 JEREMY NEFF PARCEL No. 15-13-430-025 HASLC PARCEL No. 15-13-430-017 MARY COX PARCEL No. 15-13-430-003 HASLC UT A T R A X R I G H T - O F - W A Y S 89°55'44" W 38.80' 44 9 . 4 4 ' C O N S O L I D A T I O N P A R C E L FENCE COR. IS 0.9' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.0' EAST OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 1.2' EAST OF PROP LINE POINT OF BEGINNING CONSOLIDATION PARCEL 15 8 . 0 3 ' FENCE COR. IS 1.0' WEST & 0.4' NORTH OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 0.8' EAST & 0.4' SOUTH OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 0.2' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 3.7' SOUTH OF PROP LINE FENCE COR. IS 3.6' SOUTH & 1.7' WEST OF PROP COR. D EXIST. SDCO D EXIST. SDCO D EXIST. SDCO SD V EXIST. SD VAULT D EXIST. SDCO EXIST. SDCB SQR EXIST. SDCB SQR EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING FENCE END IS 4.0' WEST OF PROP COR. FENCE COR. IS 4.0' WEST OF PROP LINE PARCEL No. 15-13-430-030 HASLCCU R B & G U T T E R SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K SI D E W A L K CU R B & G U T T E R CU R B & G U T T E R CU R B & G U T T E R WATERWAY CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER EXISTING BUILDING JEFFERSON CIRCLE (PRIVATE STREET) WEST 355.65' 318.79' CONTAINS:157,151 sq.ft. 3.608 acres CONSOLIDATION PARCEL N 89°55'43" E 308.92' SO U T H 2 8 7 . 1 0 ' S 89°55'44" W 99.43' N 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 3 " E 5 7 5 . 4 0 ' S 89°58'36" E 192.60' N 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 0 " E 1 4 3 . 5 5 ' S 89°58'36" E 148.50' S 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 0 " W 1 8 4 . 2 3 ' C1 C2 S 0 ° 1 3 ' 4 3 " W 1 6 1 . 6 3 ' SHEP COR. IS 2.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE SHEP COR. IS 2.0' SOUTH OF PROP LINE SHEP COR. IS 1.7' SOUTH OF PROP LINE PARCEL No. 15-13-430-035 HASLC CURVE TABLE CURVEC1 C2 RADIUS25.00' 50.00' LENGTH17.25' 149.44' DELTA39°32'21" 171°14'46" BEARINGS19°59'50"W S45°51'22"E CHORD16.91' 99.71' CALL BLUESTAKES @ 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION.Know what's below.before you dig.Call R HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE 0 ( IN FEET ) HORZ: 1 inch = ft.40 40 20 40 80 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH DESIGNED BY PROJECT NUMBER FOR: PROJECT MANAGER PRINT DATE PHONE: CONTACT: WWW.ENSIGNENG.COM SANDY 45 W 10000 S, Suite 500 Sandy, UT 84070 Phone: 801.255.0529 LAYTON Phone: 801.547.1100 TOOELE Phone: 435.843.3590 CEDAR CITY Phone: 435.865.1453 RICHFIELD Phone: 435.896.2983 5313D 1 OF 1 HA S L C C O N S O L I D A T I O N # 2 CO N S O L I D A T I O N S U R V E Y 17 2 6 S O U T H J E F F E R S O N S T R E E T SA L T L A K E C I T Y , U T A H CONSOLIDATION SURVEY HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY1776 SOUTH WEST TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, 84101 DANIEL NACKERMAN 801-509-0801 P. Harris B. Greenleaf 2025-06-06 ENSIGN ENG. LAND SURV. LEGEND WM HYD U D D S IRR swv WV W SS SW SD W IRR X LD SECTION CORNER MONUMENT EXIST REBAR AND CAP SET ENSIGN REBAR AND CAP WATER METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT SECONDARY WATER VALVE IRRIGATION VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN COMBO BOX STORM DRAIN CULVERT SIGN ELECTRICAL BOX UTILITY MANHOLE UTILITY POLE LIGHT CABLE BOX TELEPHONE BOX GAS METER TREE SHRUB ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE DEED LINE TANGENT LINE EXIST DITCH FLOW LINE FENCE EDGE OF ASPHALT SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE LAND DRAIN LINE CULINARY WATER LINE SECONDARY WATER LINE IRRIGATION LINE OVERHEAD POWER LINE ELECTRICAL LINE GAS LINE EXISTING CONTOURS CONCRETE BUILDING PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT DENSE VEGETATION PREVENTING ACCESS FOR ACCURATE SURVEY E OHP E CABLE G NOTE: MAY CONTAIN SYMBOLS THAT ARE NOT USED IN THIS PLAN SET. STREET MONUMENT 1700 SOUTH STREET WEST TEMPLE STREET (FOUND 2" BRASS CAP) STREET MONUMENT 2100 SOUTH STREET WEST TEMPLE STREET (FOUND 2" BRASS CAP) H HARRIS EATT S UTA OF F PATRICK M. No. 286882 RO P ISSE N LAO OR SUR Y VE DANL 6/6/25 1700 SOUTH QUAYLE AVE LAYTON AVE VENTURE WAY RI C H A R D S S T R VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) MA I N S T WE S T T E M P L E SITE SURVEYOR'S NARRATIVE I, Patrick M. Harris do hereby state that I am a Professional Land Surveyor and that I hold certificate no. 286882 as prescribed by the laws of the State of Utah and represent that I have made a survey of the following described property. The Purpose of this survey is to provide a Consolidation Survey for use by the client. The Basis of Bearing is the line between a Street Monument at the Intersection of 1700 South Street and West Temple Street and a Street Monument at the Intersection of 2100 South Street and West Temple Street measuring South 0°01'10" East 2944.22 feet. COMMITMENT DESCRIPTIONS Parcel 1: (PARCEL No. 15-13-426-008) Beginning at a point 23 rods West of the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT, "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence West 9 rods; thence North 8.7 rods; thence East 9 rods; thence South 8.7 rods to the Point of Beginning. The above described tract also being described as: Beginning at a point South 89°55'44" West 384.54 feet from the Southeast corner of Lot 12, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, and running thence South 89°55'44" West 150.39 feet; thence North 0°13'44" East 143.55 feet; thence North 89°55'44" East 150.39 feet to the West right of way of Jefferson Street; thence South 0°01'10" East along said West right of way 143.55 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 5: (PARCEL No. 15-13-430.025) Beginning at a point on the North line of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, 9 rods West of the Northeast corner of said lot and running thence South 174.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet to the South line of said Lot 13; thence along boundary of said Lot 13, 407.42 feet, more or less, to Grantor's West boundary line; thence North 287.10 feet; thence East 578 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion conveyed by that certain Warranty Deed recorded December 28, 1982 as Entry No. 3743279 in Book 5427 at Page 2598 and being more particularly described as follows: The Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Also less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane-RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel No. 6: (PARCEL No. 15-13-430-026) Beginning at a point 298.58 feet South 89°55'43" West and 32.00 feet South 0°13'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, running thence South 0°13'43" West 10.55 feet; thence Southeasterly 43.38 feet along the arc of a 70.00 foot radius curve to the right (long chord bears South 22°48'20" East 42.69 feet); thence Easterly 135.19 feet along the arc of a 430.00 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 81°03'52" East 134.64 feet); thence North 89°55'43" East 148.79 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 55.00 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 148.50 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 16.09 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 170.08 feet; thence South 0°13'43" West 113.015 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 323.00 feet; thence North 0°13'43" East 134.00 feet; thence North 54°06'27" East 206.91 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 175.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom all that portion of Jefferson street dedicated by that certain dedication plat recorded May 25, 1984 in Book 84-5 at Page 74 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 318.58 feet South 89°55'43" West from the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 7, FIVE ACRE PLAT "A", Big Field Survey, also described as being 24.35 feet North 89°59'39" East along a monument line 323.94 feet South 0°13'43" West from a monument in the intersection of 1700 South street and Jefferson street, and running thence South 0°13'43" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears South 19°26'40" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 foot radius curve to the right (long chords bears North 89°46'17" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 19°54'06" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°13'43" East 40.28 feet; thence North 89°55'43" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. The following description is the mathematical equivalent of the preceding description with all description terms correctly converted to the description terms of the Utah State plane-RECTANGULAR coordinate system as filed with the Salt Lake City Engineer, record of Survey Map Rsp#10039. Beginning at a point with state plane RECTANGULAR coordinates of X=L,890,675.068 AND Y=874,L87.490 based on the Lambert conformal projection Utah central Zone and running thence South 0°29'36" West 40.62 feet; thence 17.17 feet Southeasterly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left, (long chord bears South 19°10'47" East 16.83 feet); thence 225.75 feet Southerly, Westerly and Northerly along the arc of a 50.0 feet radius curve to the right (long chord bears North 89°30'24" West 77.33 feet); thence 17.17 feet Northerly along the arc of a 25.0 foot radius curve to the left (long chord bears North 20°09'59" East 16.83 feet); thence North 0°29'36" East 40.28 feet; thence South 89°48'24" East 66.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. CONSOLIDATION PARCEL Beginning at a point on the south line of Jefferson Street Street said point being South 00°13'43" West 158.03 feet along the west line of West Temple Street and West 318.79 feet from the Southeast Corner of Lot 12, Block 7, Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey, said point also being South 00°01'10" East 449.44 feet along the center line of said West Temple Street and West 355.65 feet from a Street Monument at the Intersection of 1700 South Street and said West Temple Street and running: thence South 00°13'43" West 161.63 feet; thence South 89°55'43" West 308.92 feet; thence South 287.10 feet; thence South 89°55'44" West 99.43 feet; thence North 00°13'43" East 575.40 feet; thence South 89°58'36" East 192.60 feet; thence North 00°13'40" East 143.55 feet; thence South 89°58'36" East 148.50 feet to a point on the west line of Jefferson Street; thence South 00°13'40" West 184.23 feet along said west line of said Jefferson Street; thence Southwesterly 17.25 feet along the arc of a 25.00 feet radius curve to the right (center bears North 89°46'20" West and the chord bears South 19°59'50" West 16.91 feet with a central angle of 39°32'21") along said west line of said Jefferson Street; thence Southeasterly 149.44 feet along the arc of a 50.00 feet radius curve to the right (center bears South 45°51'22" East and the chord bears South 45°51'22" East 99.71 feet with a central angle of 171°14'46") along said west line of said Jefferson Street to the point of beginning. Contains 157,151 sq. ft or 3.608 acres. __________ _________ ___________________________ Date Patrick M. Harris License No. 286882 6/06/25 “…statement declaring the purpose and justification for the proposed amendment”: Within the area of the proposed re-zoning, the Housing Authority proposes to construct approximately three new buildings containing approximately 250-280 units of affordable housing with attached resident amenities. See attached architectural exhibit. Upon completion, this proposal will provide a net increase of approximately 230-260 affordable units at an affordability range to be determined. As currently zoned and subdivided, the subject parcels do not support the required density and contain property lines and setbacks that significantly increase the cost and decrease the yield of the project. Approval of this application supports the Housing Authority’s mission –and Salt Lake City’s priority—of providing affordable housing for our community. “…written general description of any future development”: Approval of this Zoning application will increase the allowable density of affordable housing on the subject properties. Along the west side of the site, on vacant land abutting the TRAX right- of-way and the GC zone, we propose four stories of affordable apartment units above structured parking. See attached architectural exhibit. The visual impact of these structures will be minimal as seen from the single-family residential areas to the east. We anticipate that these buildings will contain ground-floor resident amenities facing Jefferson Street and will be served by a driveway and fire-access lane inside the consolidated properties. Pending further study, the Housing Authority anticipates mostly family-sized affordable apartment units. “…written description regarding the proposed community benefits”: This application proposes two community benefits listed in 21A.50.050: a net increase of approximately 230-260 affordable family-sized dwelling units on otherwise vacant land; and the preservation and dedication of open green space north of Jefferson circle on a portion of lot # 1513430025. This proposal also contains one unlisted benefit we consider valuable to a residential neighborhood and to reducing the urban heat-island effect: covered, structured parking hidden from off-site view. These benefits become possible thanks to the removal of internal property lines and setbacks and the increased building height allowed by the lot- consolidation and re-zoning approvals. Caution: This is an external email. Please be cautious when clicking links or opening attachments. From:Siah Siabi To:Younger, Cassie Cc:Van Lewis Subject:(EXTERNAL) Mansell Manor Rezone Public Benefit Date:Wednesday, December 3, 2025 4:33:20 PM Attachments:image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png Cassie, Thanks for your time today. Below is the statement that you can use as a commitment. Please move us into getting the approval/council approval as soon as possible. Let us know if you need anything else from us to wrap up the rezoning/consolidation process on the western portion. Thank you. Currently approximately 200-250 units are being contemplated as a path on the proposed property. As a public benefit the project will seek adding 15% (30-38) of those units at or below 80% AMI. Best, Siah Siah Siabi Development Project Executive Housing Authority of Salt Lake City 1776 S West Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84115 p: 801-428-0603 c: 801-916-3571 www.haslcutah.org “To provide affordable housing opportunities for our community.” The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future. This page has intentionally been left blank OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATOWN_ZIP LP 1700 SOUTH HOLDINGS 620 S STATE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 OKLAND CONSTRUCTION C 1978 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KELSI AMANDA GORMLEY 1636 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CINDY KHA CINDY KHA 1638 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 COLE SQUARED L.L.C. ARED 851 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 STEVE V BARNETT; SUSAN 1622 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GEORGE S RUSTER GE S RU1629 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOEL G ARMENDARIZ ARM 1637 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NATOSHA WASHINGTON W1628 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JAMES M WILLARD S M WI 1634 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDE879 N LITTLE VALLEY RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 FAMILY PROMISE-SALT LAK 814 W 800 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84104 SYDNEE SCARBOROUGH; M 134-136 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LESLEY ULIBARRI EY ULIBAR8009 S HALEHAVEN CT WEST JORDAN UT 84081 MAXINE POTTER XINE POT 1631 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 17TH TOWNHOMES, LLC N 70 NORTH MAIN STREET #106 BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 JACK H KOLKMAN K H KOL 64 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEREMY JOHN NEFF Y JOHN 163 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GZMO PROPERTIES, LLC ER 1181 E CHANDLER DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 ANNE KENDALL GOTTWALT 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MARGARET SCHAUFLER T S2001 CALIFORNIA ST APT101 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94109 JEANNIE LYNNE GUERZON; 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BRITAIN CARTER TAIN CAR 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALEXANDRA MARKS; MARI 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1710 SOUTH, A SERIES OF 3932 S 3075 E HOLLADAY UT 84124 ALEXA NORLIN; KEVIN BOL 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JAMES B CURRAN; ROBERT 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAVID BENJAMIN DICKSHI 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBERT WILLIAM NAYLOR 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 1709 SOUTH, A SERIES OF PO BOX #322 LA VERKIN UT 84745 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORAT PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 AXIST PROPERTIES LLC PER 351 W 400 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 17TH SOUTH INVESTMENT 7103 S REDWOOD RD WEST JORDAN UT 84084 ASHLEY REAL ESTATE, LLC E ONE ASHLEY WY ARCADIA WI 54612 OREGON SHORT LINE RAIL 1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640 OMAHA NE 68179 FRIDAY CORPORATION CO 4924 S WALLACE LN HOLLADAY UT 84117 FASTENER ENGINEERING & 185 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WINFORD L ALLAN TRUST 1 233 E 13560 S DRAPER UT 84020 181 WEST MGT, LLC; THAN 2040 W 3605 S WEST VALLEY UT 84119 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF S 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE COUNTY LAKE C PO BOX 144575 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 LARSEN DAVID SEQUIST VI 909 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 1734 S WEST TEMPLE L.L.C 909 S 1000 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 BRYCE NELSON; ERIC ADAM 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SHANE M STEPHENSON; HA 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 YING-TING LIN NG-TING LIN336 S 800 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 CONOR J BUCKLEY R J BUC 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JENNIFER MCCALLUM ER M1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FRANK FELDMAN; DAVID S 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KENNETH OWEN NAIL H OW 736 S 300 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84111 OLIVIA J AKERLEY A J AKER 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BRIDGE CAPITAL, LLC; SATU 724 W 500 S #500 WEST BOUNTIFUL UT 84087 HALEY MORRISON; JOHN M 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DAVID JOSEPH JANGRO SE 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOHN MCKENZIE-CARTER; 1710 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROY SISTO ALIRES & ARLEN 3899 S BURNINGHAM DR WEST VALLEY UT 84119 GRANT J NORTON; COLLEE 657 WINDSOR CT ALPINE UT 84004 CHRISTIAN L CASE TIAN L C 1741 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FRANCISCO AVILA-CRUZ; P 1751 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CODY C CARVER DY C CARV1755 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FORREST BODILY REST BOD1759 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JAVIER H ALEGRE-ALCAYAG 1722 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SIA GERARD; KARSTEN R G 1728 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 REBECCA ALEMAN RYON A 1736 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ADAM BIRKEN; ERIC BIRKE 1742 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDE1748 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALEXANDRA H GIBSON RA 1754 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DIANE VAN ROOSENDAAL; 1760 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLIAM L CARR; WENDY T 1767 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ROBERT J RILEY; GARY AYT 74 W QUAYLE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SARA SUPINSKI; BRIAN SM 58 W QUAYLE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MOLLY ALEXANDER Y ALEX 1784 S RICHARDS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUDITH WILLIAMS; ANDREW 1723 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MEGAN RADVANSKY N RAD1738 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MARY L COX MARY L COX 1746 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SALT LAKE CITY HOUSING A 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTIN NEVILLE; KELSEY LIN 82 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GRAHAM MATTHEW ABRA 76 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TRACY COTTLE RACY COTT 70 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ALEXANDER REID; AMAND 64 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEREMIAH MOLLMAN; JILL 58 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MIGUEL PEDRO GONZALEZ 81 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JOSEPH E NELSON PH E NE 75 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 EMILY J BYBEE; COREY BYB 763 N 700 W AMERICAN FORK UT 84003 MICHAEL MARTIN HAEL M 63 W BOULEVARD GARDENS SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 PARKER FREEMAN KER FRE421 W 3RD ST APT 1804 AUSTIN TX 78701 ZHONG X LI ZHONG X LI 145 E COATSVILLE AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SYLVIA A PLATERO; MARIO 1823 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ICHASE PROPERTIES LTD PE 12401 S 450 E # G2 DRAPER UT 84020 TERRE DU LAC PROPERTIES 1166 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 JOYCE RODEBACK CE RODE1847 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 THUY-TIEN HUYNH; JED PIE 70 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WENDY M SHERNER Y M S 64 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BRADY HANSEN RADY HAN60 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LANI VIGIL; DAVE VIGIL (JT 10061 S MEMORIAL DR SOUTH JORDAN UT 84095 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST A SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST B SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST C SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST D SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 407 COVELL RD EDMOND OK 73003 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 101 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 102 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 103 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 104 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 105 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 106 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 107 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 108 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 109 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 110 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 111 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 114 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 115 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 116 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 117 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 118 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 121 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 123 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 124 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 125 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 126 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TOWERS 1810 MAIN, LLC 0 1810 S MAIN ST 127 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 TWO PINES CONDMN COM 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ANASTASIA DARABAN SIA D1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WHITNEY HILLS ITNEY HILL 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JESSICA DOMINGUEZ A DO 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BERGEN ESKILDSEN N ESKI 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MICHAL C TRAEDEN L C TR 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUZ E HINOSTROZA HINOST1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 NICHOLAS RUSHFORD; MA 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LUIZ CARLOS RIOS-ABREU 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JASON CLARK RIPPLINGER 1833 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KYLEE TOKITA JENKINS ITA 1522 W SMILEY DR TAYLORSVILLE UT 84123 SALT LAKE CITY CORP E CIT PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 CINDY KUO; BENJAMIN PH 166 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BIRUK TEREFE ANAME ERE 160 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JULIA FRANKLIN; CHAD NIE 152 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GREGORY W BUTCHER Y W 146 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DONOVAN POZO ONOVAN 744 W KIRKBRIDE AVE SOUTH SALT LAKE UT 84119 CARLOS TINOCO RLOS TINO132 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LANSIA WANN LANSIA WA 124 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MICHAEL J HARDIE EL J HA 116 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JEFFREY LEE GRIMSDELL; C 110 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CHERYLEN TIDWELL; DAWN 102 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 STEVEN B LEWIS VEN B LEW175 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ADAM FROST ADAM FROST167 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MARY E NAJARRO TRUST 1 161 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MARKUS B MILLER; LINDA 153 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BRIAN K JENSEN; LARA ANN 241 OAKLEAF LN # A NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JEREMY KOPP JEREMY KOPPO BOX 18954 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84118 GLEN J LARKIN EN J LARKIN133 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ADAM BRUNER; DREW ME 125 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 T&J R.E. INVESTMENT GRO 1898 E FOXMOOR PL SANDY UT 84092 111WEST LLC 111WEST LLC111 W VENTURE WY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 B.E.S.T. WAVE II .T. WAVE 9007 S SUMMER CREST DR SANDY UT 84093 JEREMY ANDERSON MY AN178 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CIARA JANAE GOINS; NATH 3161 S 1000 E MILLCREEK UT 84106 JARED J GUTOWSKI; CHELS 166 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 RANDY T NIELSEN Y T NIELS160 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 LINDSEY FELL; RILEY HAWK 154 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 FELIPE LUNA CRISANTOS; R 148 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CELESTE PINO; CONNOR PI 142 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DEREK LARSEN; ARDITH D 134 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 WILLARD MARSHALL MCNA 128 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JILLIAN N MCQUAIL; KENN 122 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KRISTIE GILES COE E GILES 116 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MELISSA OLSEN LISSA OLSE1840 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SAM'S REAL ESTATE BUSIN PO BOX 8050 BENTONVILLE AR 72716 PETER CONTRERAS R CONT180 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 KAITLIN LINDSEY; DONALD 177 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 MOHAMMAD KHODADAD 6575 S CANYON CREST DR HOLLADAY UT 84121 BRAULIO E R MENDOZA; M 165 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SARAH REALE SARAH REAL 159 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 BLAKE COLLINS AKE COLLIN153 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SETH WISCOMBE TH WISCO255 N 400 W # 5097 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84103 TIMOTHY G BLUTH THY G B141 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JUSTIN LEE ABBOTT LEE AB2486 MARKS RD CAMERON NC 28326 WILLIAM M HENSHAW M M 129 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JANAE JENSEN ANAE JENSE9571 S 700 E # 201 SANDY UT 84070 CHALYCE D COREY YCE D C 117 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 ECHELON PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 14040 SANTA ROSA CA 95402 KARI D DALTON RI D DALTO1860 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 GORDON E HANKS DON E H1868 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 AARON BRANDON TORRES 1876 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 HOME SHARE, LLC SHARE, 6898 S 825 E MIDVALE UT 84047 ALAN J BOYER; MICHELLE S 1166 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 RAY E DEMKE; BARBARA J 1873 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 CORP OF PB OF CH OF JC L 50 E NORTHTEMPLE # FL-22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 JAMES E DAVIS MES E DAV 69 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 DOUGLAS L BURR; DUANE 63 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 230 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 170 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1646 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1639 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1628 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1634 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1640 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1646 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 134 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 124 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1631 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1689 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 129 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 10 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1709 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 59 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 67 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 205 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 241 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1773 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1811 S 300 W NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1845 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 217 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 215 W 1700 S NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1712 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 183 W 1700 S SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 185 W 1700 S NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 181 W 1700 S NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1726 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1717 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1723 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1733 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1733 S JEFFERSON ST NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1720 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1734 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 23 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 22 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 21 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 20 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 19 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 18 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 16 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 15 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 12 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 13 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1710 S WEST TEMPLE ST 14 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1715 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1729 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1735 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1741 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1751 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1755 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1759 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1767 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1719 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1723 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1812 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1738 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1746 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1758 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1760 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1750 S JEFFERSON CIR NORTH SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1750 S JEFFERSON CIR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1776 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1790 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 82 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 76 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 70 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 64 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 58 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 81 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 75 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 69 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 63 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 57 W BOULEVARD GARDENS ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1811 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1823 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1841 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1845 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1847 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 56 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1810 S MAIN ST E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 2 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 3 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 4 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 5 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 6 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 7 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 9 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1833 S WEST TEMPLE ST 11 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 178 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 166 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 160 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 152 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 146 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 138 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 132 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 126 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 116 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 110 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 102 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 177 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 175 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 167 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 161 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 153 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 147 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 139 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 133 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 125 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 117 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 111 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 103 W VENTURE WAY SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 172 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1840 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1850 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1905 S 300 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 171 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 159 W LAYTON AVE NFF1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 147 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 135 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 123 W LAYTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 110 W HIDDEN VILLA RD SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1860 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1868 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1876 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1861 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1867 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1873 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 Current Occupant 1883 S WEST TEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM:Brian Fullmer, Policy Analyst DATE:April 21, 2026 RE: Mountain View Corridor Property Conveyance ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE The Council will be briefed about an initiative to transfer City-owned right-of-way to UDOT for construction of a portion of the Mountain View Corridor. The proposal calls for UDOT to exchange property of similar value it owns for the City property. Under State code (72-4-105) UDOT can designate City streets as state highways but if the City isn’t compensated ownership remains with the City. In this instance, UDOT prefers to own the property and is providing the land exchange as compensation. As shown in the images below the subject City property is located at approximately 5750 West 1300 South and is about 1.3 acres. UDOT property to be conveyed to the City is an expanded 1300 South right-of-way adjacent to the Mountain View Corridor, and new rights-of-way at approximately 1730 South 5600 West, and 1100 South 5600 West. The only required Council action is to schedule and hold a public hearing. No Council vote is necessary. Goal of the briefing: Review the proposed land exchange and schedule a public hearing. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Under chapter 2.58 of City code, the subject property is considered a significant parcel. Transferring property between the City and UDOT requires a public hearing. Once a public hearing date is set the Administration will provide the required public notice. When the public hearing is closed that is the end of the Council’s role. The Administration will then work with UDOT to transfer ownership of the properties through quit claim deeds. Item Schedule: Page | 2 The following images showing properties that are proposed to be exchanged were included in the Administration’s transmittal. Page | 3 Page | 4 Mountain View Corridor (MVC) Parcel Transfer Cooperative Agreement No. 2 Between UDOT and Salt Lake City MVC Parcel Transfer Overall Site Plan: •Green: SLC Transfer to UDOT •Red: UDOT Transfer to SLC Cooperative Agreement No. 2 formalizes the exchange of property and infrastructure between the City and UDOT related to the buildout of the MVC •City to Transfer Green Segment to UDOT: •California Avenue (1300 South) •UDOT to Transfer Red Segments to City: •California Avenue Widening •Legacy View Street Cul-de-Sac Current Condition (2026): Construction Completed MVC Parcel Transfer •UDOT to Transfer Red Segments to City: •Newly Created 1730 South Extension •Shared Use Path Trailhead Parking Area MVC Parcel Transfer Current Condition (2026): Construction Completed •UDOT to Transfer Red Segment to City: •Newly Created 1100 South Extension Between 5600 W and Legacy View St MVC Parcel Transfer Current Condition (2026): Construction Completed SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To:  Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 04/02/2026 Date Sent to Council: 04/03/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Hunt, Logan E-mail Logan.Hunt@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 04/03/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 04/03/2026 Subject: Initiative to convey City-owned Right of Way to UDOT for UDOT’s construction of the Mountain View Corridor. Additional Staff Contact: Mark Stephen Presenters/Staff Table Document Type Information Item Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Set the date for a public hearing to facilitate public noticing and hearing requirements for the transfer of significant parcels to UDOT. Background/Discussion See first attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process The public process for the conveyance of significant parcels will be carried out with the submission of this transmittal, Class A noticing of the public hearing, and through the public hearing held before Council. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ________________________ Date Received: _________________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: _________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: April 2, 2026 Victoria Petro, Chair FROM: Tammy Hunsaker, Director, Department of Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) __________________________ SUBJECT: Initiative to convey City-owned Right of Way (ROW) to Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) for UDOT’s construction of the Mountain View Corridor segment from 4100 South to SR-201. The City-owned ROW is identified as a “significant parcel” under City Code Chapter 2.58, which triggers a notice and hearing process prior to the parcel being conveyed to UDOT. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Stephens, City Engineer 801-503-5370, mark.stephens@slc.gov Logan Hunt, Real Estate Services Director 801-535-7249, logan.hunt@slc.gov DOCUMENT TYPE: Written briefing RECOMMENDATION: Set the date for a public hearing to facilitate public noticing and hearing requirements for the transfer of significant parcels to UDOT. BUDGET IMPACT: N/A BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The purpose of this transmittal is to initiate the process to transfer a significant parcel of real property to UDOT for the construction of the Mountain View Corridor. Utah Code § 72-4-105 authorizes UDOT to designate existing city streets as state highways, in cooperation with the city, without providing compensation to the municipality. Utah § 72-4-105 does not provide UDOT the authority to acquire title of these city streets without compensation, however, in this instance, UDOT is seeking title of these city streets and is compensating the City through a roughly equal exchange of property. The parcel of existing City owned right of way to be conveyed to UDOT includes the land described at Mountain View Corridor and California Avenue (1300 South Street) at approximately 5750 West, consisting of 57,664 square feet (1.324 acres) described in exhibit A. UDOT will convey the expanded 1300 South right of way adjacent to the Mountain View Corridor and the new right of way located at approximately 1730 South and 5600 West, and 1100 South and 5600 West to the City as described in exhibit A. Pursuant to City Code Chapter 2.58, conveying the City’s interest in a street is identified as a significant parcel. Consequently, a public process is required under City Code Section 2.58.040. This process requires Class A noticing and a Public Hearing before the City Council. The Council’s role in this transaction is as follows: a. The Administration is requesting that the Council set the date for a public hearing. Once the public hearing date is set by Council, the Administration will provide notice of the proposed transfer and the public hearing through the process outlined in section 63G-30-102 of state code for “Class A” public notice. This includes posting the public notice on the Utah Public Notice and City websites, and on the affected parcel in accordance with the State code. b. The Council will then hold a public hearing. There is no need for Council to take any action after holding a public hearing. PUBLIC PROCESS: The public process for the conveyance of significant parcels will be carried out with the submission of this transmittal, noticing of the public hearing, and through the public hearing held before Council. EXHIBITS: A. Maps of ROW transferred from UDOT to Salt Lake City and from Salt Lake City to UDOT S-0085(9)0; SALT LAKE County SR-85, Mountain View Corridor; 4100 South to SR-201 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CID 72192 PIN 13149 Page 1 of 5 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 2 Between UDOT and Salt Lake City MVC: 4100 South to SR-201 Right-of-Way Exchange THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT, entered into this ______ day of _______________, 2024, by and between the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as "UDOT", and SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Municipal Corporation in the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, UDOT is engaged in preparing plans, specifications, and estimates of costs toward constructing that certain section of highway identified as Mountain View Corridor , 4100 South to SR-201; Project Number MP-0085(9)0 in Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah; and WHEREAS, Work shall be defined as: all duties and services to be furnished and provided by Design-Builder as required by the construction contract, including the administrative, design, engineering, quality control, quality assurance, relocation, procurement, legal, professional, manufacturing, supply, installation, construction, supervision, management, testing, verification, labor, materials, equipment, documentation and other efforts necessary or appropriate to achieve construction contract completion except for those efforts which the construction contract documents specify will be performed by the UDOT or other persons. WHEREAS, UDOT will include in its construction contract those items of work required to construct, relocate, and adjust CITY’s facilities in accordance with the provisions of 23 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, Part 645, Subpart A, Utility Relocations, Adjustment, and Reimbursement; and WHEREAS, the parties have determined to exchange certain parcels of land associated with the roads in the vicinity of the work that are necessary to address the impacts of the work and provide for the operation of CITY and UDOT roadways; and UDOT has reviewed the exchanges involved in connection with Utah Code §§72-5-117 and 72-6-117 and determined that the values involved are congruent and the transfers are for a public transportation purpose; and WHEREAS, to facilitate traffic flow along and to facilitate access to Mountain View Corridor from intersections and access points in the CITY, the parties shall designate specific access management and corridor preservation elements. S-0085(9)0; SALT LAKE County SR-85, Mountain View Corridor; 4100 South to SR-201 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CID 72192 PIN 13149 Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. CONVEYANCE OF FEE PROPERTY 1.1. PROPERTY AT INTERCHANGE CROSS STREETS: Both UDOT and the CITY currently own fee property at the future interchange cross street location as identified in Exhibit 1 and listed below: 1.1.1. California Avenue (1300 South) As part of the MVC Project, UDOT acquired property to widen CITY cross streets at this location. UDOT will convey to the CITY via quit claim deed, without any compensation to UDOT, property as shown on Exhibit 1 and the CITY will convey to UDOT via quit claim deed, without any compensation to the CITY pursuant to Utah Code §72-4-105, property as shown on Exhibit 1. 1.2. PROPERTY AT NON-INTERCHANGE (GRADE SEPARATED) CROSS STREETS: UDOT has obtain the required Right-of-Way and has construct 1730 South; as shown on Exhibit 2. The MVC Project has constructed a grade-separated crossing at 1730 South. The CITY will coordinate with UDOT on any maintenance activities that impact the bridges or the operation of MVC. The CITY will maintain all of 1730 South, including the portion that crosses under MVC. Upon completion of the roadway construction, UDOT will convey to the CITY via quit claim deed, without any compensation to UDOT the Right-of-Way outside of the MVC, as shown on Exhibit 2 and the CITY will convey to UDOT via quit claim deed, without any compensation to the CITY pursuant to Utah Code §72-4- 105, property as shown on Exhibit 2. 1.3. PROPERTY FOR 1100 SOUTH: UDOT has obtain the required Right-of-Way and has construct 1100 South between 5600 West and Legacy View Street; as shown on Exhibit 3. Upon completion of the roadway construction, UDOT will convey to the CITY via quit claim deed, without any compensation to UDOT, property as shown on Exhibit 1 pursuant to Utah Code §72-4-105, property as shown on Exhibit 3. This property has been deeded to the CITY and recorded as Entry 13659367, Book 11172, Page 4964-4965 on May 11, 2021 in the Salt Lake County Recorder’s Office 2. The CITY shall notify the UDOT Resident Engineer upon entering the project corridor. The UDOT Project Utility Coordinator shall be contacted only when the UDOT Resident Engineer cannot be contacted. 2.1. The UDOT Resident Engineer and Project Director is: Marwan Farah 2010 South 2760 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 Phone (801) 887-3415 Email: mfarah@utah.gov S-0085(9)0; SALT LAKE County SR-85, Mountain View Corridor; 4100 South to SR-201 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CID 72192 PIN 13149 Page 3 of 5 3. The parties agree that all materials from the CITY’s existing facilities which are recovered by the Contractor while performing the work covered herein and not reused on the project shall become the property of said highway contractor except as noted otherwise herein. 4. The parties agree that, in the event there are changes in the scope of the work, extra work, or changes in the planned work covered by this Agreement, a modification approved in writing by the parties hereto shall be required prior to the start of work on said changes or additions. 5. The parties agree that access for future maintenance and servicing of UDOT owned, CITY maintained property located on the Mountain View Corridor right-of-way will be by permit issued by UDOT to the CITY, and that the CITY shall obtain said permit and abide by the conditions thereof for policing and other controls in conformance with Utah Admin. Code R-930-7. However, UDOT agrees that no permit is needed for the maintenance or modification of landscaping located behind the curb and gutter on the outside of the roadway and/or CITY facilities (roadway, curb & gutter, drainage, etc) that are grade- separated from the state highway, such as 1730 South. 6. UDOT and the CITY are both governmental entities subject to the Governmental Immunity Act. Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless from and against all claims, suits and costs, including attorneys' fees for injury or damage of any kind, arising out of its negligent acts, errors or omissions of its officers, agents, contractors or employees in the performance of this project, and from and against all claims, suits, and costs, including attorneys' fees for injury or damage of any kind. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to create additional rights to third parties or to waive any of the provisions of the Governmental Immunity Act. The obligation to indemnify is limited to the dollar amounts set forth in the Governmental Immunity Act, provided said Act applies to the action or omission giving rise to the protections in this paragraph. The indemnification in this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. The CITY further agrees to relieve UDOT from any responsibility or liability that may result from the CITY’s operation or maintenance activities covered herein. 8. Any periodic plan and specification review or construction inspection performed by UDOT arising out of the performance of the project does not relieve the CITY of its duty in the performance of this project or to ensure compliance with acceptable standards. 9. Based on future considerations and as additional needs arise, this Cooperative Agreement may be amended from its original form; however, any such amendments shall require evidence of the concurrence of both parties, UDOT and the CITY, in the form of an Amendment to Cooperative Agreement signed by an authorized individual. 17. Each party represents that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement. 18. This Agreement may be amended, changed, modified or altered only by an instrument in writing. 19. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the UDOT and the CITY. S-0085(9)0; SALT LAKE County SR-85, Mountain View Corridor; 4100 South to SR-201 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CID 72192 PIN 13149 Page 4 of 5 20. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah. In any action brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the Parties agree that the appropriate venue shall be the Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, Utah. 21. The parties, respectively for their interests, and for their heirs, representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as part of the consideration hereof, do hereby covenant and agree that in connection with facilities that are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated for the project, they shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said regulations may be amended, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities; (2) in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination; and (3) the parties, respectively for their interests, shall use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to such laws. 22. Each party agrees to undertake and perform all further acts that are reasonably necessary (except when expressly prohibited by law) to carry out the intent and purpose of the Agreement, and to maintain compliance with the laws applicable to each party, after receiving a written notice that explains the need for such action from another party. S-0085(9)0; SALT LAKE County SR-85, Mountain View Corridor; 4100 South to SR-201 SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION CID 72192 PIN 13149 Page 5 of 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Utah (Affix Seal) By:_________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ City Attorney City Engineer Date:_______________________________________ Date:________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ City Recorder Date:________________________________________ Date:________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ Project Director Director of Right-of-Way Date:________________________________________ Date:________________________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED: By:__________________________________________ By:__________________________________________ UDOT Counsel UDOT Comptroller Office, Contract Administrator Date:________________________________________ Date:________________________________________ WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Utah Department of Transportation Right of Way, Fourth Floor Box 148420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 Continued on Page 2 UDOT RW-05CY (11-01-03) Quit Claim Deed (County) Salt Lake County Affecting Tax ID No. NA PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:601 Salt Lake City, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Utah, Grantor, hereby QUIT CLAIMS to the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Grantee, at 4501 South 2700 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 841 1 4 , for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations, the parcel of land in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to-wit: A parcel of land for a highway known as the Mountain View Corridor (SR-85), being part of the existing California Avenue (1300 South Street) situate in the SW1/4 SE1/4 and the SE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 11, and the NW1/4 NE1/4 and the NE1/4NE1/4 of Section 14 T.1S., R.2W., S.L.B.&M. The boundaries of said parcel of land are described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing southerly right of way line of California Avenue (1300 South Street), which point is 747.66 feet N.89°41'43"W. along the section line and 33.00 feet S.00°18 '17"W. from the Northeast Corner of said Section 14; and running thence N.89°41'43"W. 783.49 feet along said existing southerly right of way line; thence N.00°18'17"E. 66.00 feet to the existing nor therly right of way line of said California Avenue (1300 South Street); thence along said existing northerly right of way line the following three (3) courses: (1) S.89°41'43"E. 122.01 feet; thence (2) N.00°11'44"E. 9.00 feet; thence (3) S.89°41'43"E. 661.50 feet; thence S.00°18'17"W. 75.00 feet to the point of b eginning as shown on the official map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. The above described parcel of land contains 57,664 square feet in area or 1.324 acres, more or less. (Note: All bearings in the above description match highway bearings.) Page 2 PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:601 Prepared by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 10S - 12/19/2021 UDOT RW-05CY (11-01-03) STATE OF ) OF: Salt Lake City ) ss. ) COUNTY OF ) By: On this day of , in the year 20 , before me personally appeared, , whose identity is personally known to me (or proven on the basis of satisfactory evidence) and who by me being duly sworn/affirmed, did say that he/she is the , of Salt Lake City, a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, and that said document was signed by him/her on behalf of said Salt Lake City by Authority adopted at a regular meeting of the held on the of A.D. 20 , and said acknowledged to me that said municipal corporation executed the same. Notary Public WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Utah Department of Transportation Right of Way, Fourth Floor Box 148420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 Continued on Page 2 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) Quit Claim Deed (Controlled Access) Salt Lake County Affecting Tax ID No. 14-14-200-003 PIN No. 3616 Project No. SP-0182(1)0 Parcel No. 0182:519:AQ The UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, by its duly appointed Director of Right of Way, Grantor, of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, hereby QUIT CLAIMS to SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah Municipal corporation, Grantee, for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations, the tract of land in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to-wit: A tract of land, situate in the NE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 14, T.1S., R.2W., S.L.B. & M. The boundaries of said tract of land: Beginning at a point 32.41 feet S.00°14'53"W. along the section line and 110.29 feet West from the Northeast Corner of said Section 14; and running thence S.00°18'17"W. 58.82 feet to the existing southerly right of way line of California Avenue at a point 92.23 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from the California Avenue Right of Way Control Line of said project opposite engineer station 126+14.83; thence along said existing southerly right of way line the following four (4) courses: (1) N.89°33'05"W. 24.83 feet to a point 92.14 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 125+90.00; thence (2) N.84°14'12"W. 11.75 feet to a point 91.01 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 125+78.31 and the beginning of a 144.50-foot radius curve to the left; thence (3) westerly 13.88 feet along the arc of said curve , through a central angle of 05°30'07" (Note: Chord to said curve bears N.86°59'16"W. for a distance of 13.87 feet) to a point 90.34 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 125+64.45; thence (4) N.89°44'19"W. 287.51 feet to a point marking the end of the existing southerly right of way and no-access line of Mountainview Corridor, said point is 90.24 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 122+76.94; thence along said existing southerly right of way and no-access line the following five (5) courses: (1) N.89°44'19"W. 52.44 feet to a point 90.22 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 122+24.50; thence (2) N.87°56'07"W. 19.01 feet to a point 89.61 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 122+05.50; thence (3) N.81°58'18"W. 21.20 feet to a point 86.74 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 121+84.50; thence (4) N.84°24'36"W. 69.30 feet to a point Page 2 PIN No. 3616 Project No. SP-0182(1)0 Parcel No. 0182:519:AQ Continued on Page 3 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) 80.28 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 121+15.50; thence (5) N.89°44'37"W. 138.05 feet to a point 80.24 feet perpendicularly distant southerly from said control line opposite engineer station 119+77.45; thence N.00°18'17"E. 47.55 feet; thence S.89°41'43"E. 637.40 feet to the point of beginning as shown on the official map of said pro ject on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. The above described tract of land contains 34,642 square feet in area or 0.795 acre, more or less. In the event Grantee transfers the property or uses the described property for uses inconsistent with roadway purposes, the property shall automatically revert to, vest in, and become the fee property of the Utah Department of Transportation and assigns. Signs, Billboards, outdoor Advertising structures, or advertising of any kind as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 131, shall not be erected, displayed, placed or maintained upon or within this tract, EXCEPT signs to advertise the sale, hire or lease of this tract or the principal activities conducted on this land. The grantor reserves rights to use the abutting state property for highway purposes and excludes from this grant any rights to air, light, view and visibility over and across the abutting state property. The Grantee is hereby advised that due to present or future construction on the adjacent highway including but not limited to excavation, embankment, structures, poles, signs, walls, fences and all other activities related to highway construction, or which may be permitted within the Highway Right of Way that air, light, view and visibility may be restricted or obstructed on the above property. Together with and subject to any and all easements, rights of way and restri ctions appearing of record or enforceable in law and equity. Junkyards, as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 136, shall not be established or maintained on the above described tracts of lands. RESERVING UNTO GRANTOR the right to control the access from the adjacent property to the South over and across the right of way and no-access line as defined by this document and shown on the official map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. Page 3 PIN No. 3616 Project No. SP-0182(1)0 Parcel No. 0182:519:AQ Prepared by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 54Q 11/30/2021 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) STATE OF UTAH ) UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) Ross Crowe, Director of Right of Way, UDOT On this day of , in the year 20 , before me personally appeared, Ross Crowe, whose identity is personally known to me (or proven on the basis of satisfactory evidence) and who by me being duly sworn/affirmed, did say that he is the Director of Right of Way of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notary Public Revised by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 1/02/2024 WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Utah Department of Transportation Right of Way, Fourth Floor Box 148420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 Continued on Page 2 UDOT RW-05UD (11-01-03) Quit Claim Deed Salt Lake County Affecting Tax ID No. 14-14-400-003 PIN No. 3616 Project No. SP-0182(1)0 Parcel No. 0182:519:Q The UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, by its duly appointed Director of Right of Way, Grantor, of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, hereby QUIT CLAIMS to SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah Municipal corporation, Grantee, for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations, the tract of land in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to-wit: A tract of land, situate in the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 14, T.1S., R.2W., S.L.B. & M. The boundaries of said tract of land are described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the existing northerly right of way line of 1730 South Street and the existing westerly right of way line of 5600 West Street (SR-172), which point is 114.50 feet S.00°15'18"W. along the section line and 75.00 feet West from the East Quarter corner of said Section 14; and running thence S.00°15'18"W. 135.00 feet to existing southerly right of way line of said 1730 South Street; thence West 825.22 feet along said existing southerly right of way line to the existing easterly right of way and no-access line of the Mountain View Corridor (SR-85); thence North 135.00 feet along said existing easterly right of way and no-access line to the existing northerly right of way line of said 1730 South Street; thence East 825.82 feet along said existing northerly right of way line to the point of beginning as shown on the officia l map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. The above described tract of land contains 111,445 square feet in area or 2.558 acres, more or less. In the event Grantee transfers the property or uses the described pr operty for uses inconsistent with roadway purposes, the property shall automatically revert to , vest in, and become the fee property of the Utah Department of Transportation and assigns. Together with and subject to any and all easements, rights of way and restrictions appearing of record or enforceable in law and equity. Page 2 PIN No. 3616 Project No. SP-0182(1)0 Parcel No. 0182:519:Q Prepared by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 54Q 11/30/2021 UDOT RW-05UD (11-01-03) Junkyards, as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 136, shall not be established or maintained on the above described tracts of lands. Signs, Billboards, outdoor Advertising structures, or advertising of any kind as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 131, shall not be erected, displayed, placed or maintained upon or within this tract, EXCEPT signs to advertise the sale, hire or lease of this tract or the principal activities conducted on this land. STATE OF UTAH ) UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) Ross Crowe, Director of Right of Way, UDOT On this day of , in the year 20 , before me personally appeared, Ross Crowe, whose identity is personally known to me (or proven on the basis of satisfactory evidence) and who by me being duly sworn/affirmed, did say that he is the Director of Right of Way of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notary Public Revised by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 1/02/2024 WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Utah Department of Transportation Right of Way, Fourth Floor Box 148420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 Continued on Page 2 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) Quit Claim Deed (Controlled Access) Salt Lake County Record as Requested Affecting Tax ID No. NA PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:519:2AQ The UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, by its duly appointed Director of Right of Wa y, Grantor, of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, hereby QUIT CLAIMS to SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah Municipal corporation, Grantee, for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations, the tract of lan d in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to-wit: A tract of land, situate in the NW1/4 SE1/4 and the SW1/4 SE1/4 and the SE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 14, T.1S., R.2W., S.L.B. & M. The boundaries of said tract of land are described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing westerly right of way and limited-access line of the Mountain View Corridor (SR-85), which point is 269.67 feet S.00°15'18"W. along the section line and 1,378.81 feet West from the East Quarter corner of said Section 14, said point is also 201.24 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from the Mountain View Corridor Right of Way Control Line opposite engineer station 1945+16.05; and running thence along said existing westerly right of way and limited-access line the following two (2) courses: (1) southwesterly 260.19 feet along the arc of a 225.00-foot curve to the left through a central angle of 66°15'20" (Note: Radius bears S.21°09'32"E., Chord bears S.35°42'48"W. for a distance of 245.93 feet) to a point 343.65 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1943+15.55; thence (2) S.01°19'06"W. 1,056.20 feet to a point in said existing westerly right of way and limited-access line, said point is 361.89 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1932+59.50; thence S.01°19'06"W. 78.01 feet to a point in said existing westerly right of way and limited-access line, said point is 363.24 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1931+81.50; thence along said existing westerly right of way and limited-access line the following two (2) courses: (1) S.01°19'06"W. 284.57 feet to the beginning of a 660.11-foot radius non-tangent curve to the right (Note: Radius bears S.89°22'22"W.) at a point 368.15 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1928+96.97; thence (2) southwesterly 671.03 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 58°14'38" (Note: Chord to said curve bears S.28°29'42"W. for a distance of 642.51 feet) to the existing northerly right of way line of Page 2 PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:519:2AQ Continued on Page 3 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) the SR-201 frontage road at a point 671.44 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1923+30.55; thence along said existing northerly right of way line the following three (3) courses: (1) S.86°43'21"W. 893.93 feet to the begin ning of a 11,564.16-foot radius non-tangent curve to the left (Note: Radius bears S.03°14'01"E.); thence (2) westerly 36.01 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 00°10'42" (Note: Chord to said curve bears S.86°40'38"W. for a distance of 35.99 feet) to the beginning of a 5,888.58-foot radius non-tangent curve to the left (Note: Radius bears S.03°27'21"E.); thence (3) westerly 769.05 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 07°28'59" (Note: Chord to said curve bears S.82°48'10"W. for a distance of 768.53 feet); thence N.89°54'26"W. 180.80 feet; thence N.00°05'34"E. 76.93 feet ; thence N.86°28'21"E. 1,553.87 feet to the beginning of a 535.11-foot radius curve to the left; thence northeasterly 815.47 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 87°18'53" (Note: Chord to said curve bears N.42°48'54"E. for a distance of 738.82 feet); thence N.01°19'06"E. 1,409.84 feet to the beginning of a 350.00-foot radius non-tangent curve to the right (Note: Radius bears S.89°41'52"E.); thence northeasterly 466.55 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 76°22'3 3" (Note: Chord to said curve bears N.38°29'24"E. for a distance of 432.77 feet) to said existing westerly right of way and no-access line of the Mountain View Corridor (SR-85); thence S.00°14'53"W. 130.75 feet along said existing westerly right of way and no-access line to the point of beginning as shown on the official map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. The above described tract of land contains 399,736 square feet in area or 9.177 acres, more or less. In the event Grantee transfers the property or uses the described property for uses inconsistent with roadway purposes, the property shall automatically revert to, vest in, and become the fee property of the Utah Department of Transportation and assigns. Pursuant to Title 72, Chapter 6, Section 117, the above described tract of land is granted without access to or from the adjoining highway over and across the easterly boundary line of said tract of land. Signs, Billboards, outdoor Advertising structures, or advertising of any kind as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 131, shall not be erected, displayed, placed or maintained upon or within this tract, EXCEPT signs to advertise the sale, hire or lease of this tract or the principal activities conducted on this land. The grantor reserves rights to use the abutting state property for highway purposes and excludes from this grant any rights to air, light, view and visibility over and across the abutting state property. The Grantee is hereby advised that due to present or future construction on the adjacent highway including but not limited to excavation, embankment, structures, poles, signs, walls, fences and all other activities related to highway construction, or which may be permitted within the Highway Right of Way that air, light, view and visibility may be restricted or obstructed on the above property. Together with and subject to any and all easements, rights of way and restrictions appearing of record or enforceable in law and equity. Page 3 PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:519:2AQ Prepared by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 04Q 11/30/2021 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) Junkyards, as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 136, shall not be established or maintained on the above described tracts of lands. STATE OF UTAH ) UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) By Charles A. Stormont, Director of Right of Way On this day of , in the year of 20 , before me personally appeared, Charles A. Stormont , whose identity is personally known to me (or proven on the basis of satisfactory evidence) and who by me being duly sworn/affirmed, did say that he is the Director of Right of Way of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . Notary Public Revised by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 6/27/2023 WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Utah Department of Transportation Right of Way, Fourth Floor Box 148420 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8420 Continued on Page 2 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) Quit Claim Deed (Controlled Access) Salt Lake County Affecting Tax ID No. 14-14-401-002 PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:519:3AQ The UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, by its duly appointed Director of Right of Way, Grantor, of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, hereby QUIT CLAIMS to SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Utah Municipal corporation, Grantee, for the sum of TEN ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable considerations, the tract of land in Salt Lake County, State of Utah, to-wit: A tract of land, situate in the SW1/4 SE1/4 of Section 14, T.1S., R.2W., S.L.B. & M. The boundaries of said tract of land are described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing westerly right of way and limited-access line of the Mountain View Corridor (SR-85), which point is 1,525.28 feet S.00°15'18"W. along the section line and 1,541.08 feet West from the East Quarter corner of said Section 14, said point is also 361.89 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from the Mountain View Corridor Right of Way Control Line opposite engineer station 1932+59.50; and running thence along said existing westerly right of way and limited-access line the following three (3) courses: (1) S.89°40'17"E. 76.39 feet to a point 285.50 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1932+59.50; thence (2) S.00°19'43"W. 78.00 feet to a point 285.50 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1931+81.50; thence (3) N.89°40'17"W. 77.74 feet to a point 363.24 feet perpendicularly distant westerly from said control line opposite engineer station 1931+81.50; thence N.01°19'06"E. 78.01 feet to the point of beginning as shown on the official map of said project on file in the office of the Utah Department of Transportation. The above described tract of land contains 6,011 square feet in area or 0.138 acre, more or less. In the event Grantee transfers the property or uses the described property for uses inconsistent with roadway purposes, the property shall automatically revert to, vest in, and become the fee property of the Utah Department of Transportation and assigns. Page 2 PIN No. 13149 Project No. S-0085(9) Parcel No. 0085:519:3AQ Prepared by: (TJB) Meridian Engineering, Inc. 04Q 6/27/2023 UDOT RW-05UDA (11-01-03) Pursuant to Title 72, Chapter 6, Section 117, the above described tract of land is granted without access to or from the adjoining highway over and across the northerly, easterly and southerly boundary lines of said tract of land. Signs, Billboards, outdoor Advertising structures, or advertising of any kind as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 131, shall not be erected, displayed, placed or maintained upon or within this tract, EXCEPT signs to advertise the sale, hire or lease of this tract or the principal activities conducted on this land. The grantor reserves rights to use the abutting state property for highway purposes and excludes from this grant any rights to air, light, view and visibility over and across the abutting state property. The Grantee is hereby advised that due to present or future construction on the adjacent highway including but not limited to excavation, embankment, structures, poles, signs, walls, fences and all other activities related to highway construction, or which may be permitted within the Highway Right of Way that air, light, view and visibility may be restricted or obstructed on the above property. Together with and subject to any and all easements, rights of way and restrictions appearing of record or enforceable in law and equity. Junkyards, as defined in Title 23 United States Code, Section 136, shall not be established or maintained on the above described tracts of lands. STATE OF UTAH ) UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ) ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) By Charles A. Stormont, Director of Right of Way On this day of , in the year of 20 , before me personally appeared, Charles A. Stormont , whose identity is personally known to me (or proven on the basis of sa tisfactory evidence) and who by me being duly sworn/affirmed, did say that he is the Director of Right of Way of the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . Notary Public This page has intentionally been left blank Attachment 1 - Page 1 Attachment 1 - Page 2