The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/09/2026 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA FORMAL MEETING June 9, 2026 Tuesday 7:00 PM Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in person at the City & County Building. Learn more at slc.gov/council/agendas. Council Chambers 451 South State Street, Room 315 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 slc.gov/council CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Alejandro Puy, Chair District 2 Erika Carlsen, Vice Chair District 5 Victoria Petro District 1 Chris Wharton District 3 District 4 Dan Dugan District 6 Sarah Young District 7 Generated: 12:11:40 Please note: Dates not identified in the FYI - Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES A.OPENING CEREMONY: 1.Council Member Alejandro Puy will conduct the formal meeting. 2.Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules. 4.The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing June 19, 2026 as Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City. B.PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Ordinance: Indefinite Alleyway Closure in Jefferson Park The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would indefinitely close a 16-foot by 275-foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15-foot by 100-foot east/west alleyway Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision within Jefferson Park, pursuant to Utah Code §72-5-105. The proposal would consolidate all parcels that make up Jefferson Park into a single parcel to facilitate park improvements that are being funded by the Parks, Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bond (GO Bond) and Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funding. If the closure is approved, the alleyways will continue to be part of Jefferson Park. There are no properties that rely on these alleyways for access. The alley portion used by residents on 200 West and Goltz Avenue to access their properties will not be affected by the proposed closure. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 5, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 and Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 14, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Continue the Public Hearing. C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS: 1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No.5 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 The Council will consider adopting an ordinance amending the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes funding for new police officers, replacement of aging police patrol vehicles, the purchase of a transport van, and a pass-through of property tax revenue to the Salt Lake City Public Library, among other items. For more information visit tinyurl.com/SLCFY26. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, June 2, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). D.NEW BUSINESS: 1. Advice and Consent: Salt Lake City Judicial Nominating Commission Members The Council will consider approving the appointment of Kate Fairchild and David Quealy as Salt Lake City's Judicial Nominating Commission Members. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - n/a Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Suspend the rules and consider motions. E.UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Resolution: Intention to Designate The Sugar House Special Assessment Area The Council will consider adopting a Resolution of Intention to designate the Sugar House Business District 2027 (SHBD-27), establishing a Special Assessment Area (SAA) in the core commercial area of Sugar House. The proposal would also establish secondary assessment for specialty lighting and signage for a three-year period. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Thursday, May 28, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, July 14, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, August 18, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Refer to motion sheet(s). F.CONSENT: 1. Ordinance: Alley Vacation at Approximately 567 East Warnock Avenue The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would vacate a City-owned alley adjacent to the properties at approximately 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2434 South 600 East, running between Warnock Avenue and the Interstate 80 right-of-way. If approved, the alley would be divided in half and allocated to the neighboring property owners. The alley is 16.5 feet wide and 80 feet long, with no public access, and is currently occupied by power poles for both properties and lines crossing to the other side of Interstate 80. Located within Council District 7. Petitioner: Jill Genessy, on behalf of property owner Gray Willow, LLC. Petition No.: PLNPCM2025-01099. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 21, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 2. Ordinance: Mobile Business Text Amendment The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to mobile businesses on private property. The proposal would address legislative changes in state law that limit the types of regulations cities can impose on mobile businesses and bring the City’s mobile business code into compliance. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, June 2, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, July 21, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date. 3. Resolution: Capital Improvement Program The Council will set the date of Tuesday, July 21, 2026 at 7 p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution for project funding allocations in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets, or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service and overall CIP funding in June with the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is approved by September 1 of the same calendar year. FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion) Briefing - Tuesday, July 14, 2026 Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, April 21, 2026, Tuesday, May 19, 2026, and Tuesday, June 9, 2026 Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, May 19, 2026, Tuesday, June 2, 2026, and Tuesday, July 21, 2026 at 7 p.m. TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, June 16, 2026 and Tuesday, August 25, 2026 Staff Recommendation - Set date. G.COMMENTS: 1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council. 2.Comments to the City Council. (This is a one-hour time slot for the public to comment on any City business not scheduled for a public hearing. Each person will have two minutes to talk. General comment registration closes at 7:30 p.m.) H.ADJOURNMENT: CERTIFICATE OF POSTING On or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, June 5, 2026, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder, does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who have indicated interest. KEITH REYNOLDS SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations of options discussed. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. JOINT RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING WHEREAS, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation effective January 1, 1863, declaring that all enslaved people in Confederate states free; however, many enslavers in the South continued to ignore this order; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 1865, Union General Gordon Granger and Union soldiers, including U.S. Colored Troops arrived in Galveston, Texas, and issued General Order No. 3, officially enforcing the emancipation of stolen Africans and some Indigenous people still held in human bondage in Texas; and WHEREAS,President Lincoln recognized in 1865 that “without the military help of the Black freedmen, the war against the South could not have been won”; and WHEREAS,Juneteenth is one of the oldest celebrated commemorations of the end of slavery in the United States; first celebrated in Texas in 1866, established as a federal holiday in 2021, and recognized by the State of Utah in 2022; and WHEREAS,Juneteenth allows Salt Lake City to celebrate the heritage, resilience, and contributions of Black Americans, honor their role in the struggle for justice, equality, and freedom, and commit to doing our part to help build a more equitable community; and WHEREAS,Juneteenth also recognizes America’s commitment to liberty and equality, as reflected in the Constitution of the United States, the Emancipation Proclamation, and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified by Congress on December 6, 1865; and WHEREAS, even after the abolition of slavery, other systems of racial oppression—including sharecropping, Jim Crow laws, redlining, and mass incarceration—continue to harm Black communities and perpetuate systemic inequities in health, safety, and education; and WHEREAS, honest acknowledgment of this history is essential to building a future rooted in the core American values of freedom, diversity, equity, and justice for all; and WHEREAS,both the federal government and Utah now recognize Juneteenth as an official holiday. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Salt Lake City Council and Mayor of Salt Lake City recognize Juneteenth Freedom Day in Salt Lake City in celebration of the cultural, economic, and humanitarian role of emancipation and the work toward that liberation in our past, present, and future. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Salt Lake City reaffirms its commitment to freedom and dignity for all people, and unequivocally opposes and rejects all forms of oppression and injustice. Adopted this 9th day of June 2026. Item B1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Brian Fullmer Policy Analyst DATE:June 9, 2026 RE: Alley Closure at Jefferson Park (approximately 1100 South West Temple) MOTION 1 (continue hearing) **Need to continue hearing due to noticing error** I move that the Council continue the public hearing to a future Council meeting. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 02/05/2026 Date Sent to Council: 04/21/2026 From: Department * Public Lands Employee Name: Romero, Maria E-mail maria.romero@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 02/05/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 04/21/2026 Subject: Ordinance - Closing a 16 foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15 foot east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision Additional Staff Contact: Kim Shelley, Public Lands Director Kim.Shelley@slc.govTyler Murdock, Deputy Director Tyler.Murdock@slc.govAmy Reid, Associate Landscape Architect Amy.Reid@slc.govTom Millar, Planning & Design Division Director Tom.Millar@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Kim Shelley, Public Lands Director Kim.Shelley@slc.govTyler Murdock, Deputy Director Tyler.Murdock@slc.govAmy Reid, Associate Landscape Architect Amy.Reid@slc.govTom Millar, Planning & Design Division Director Tom.Millar@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Approve Background/Discussion Attachment 1 for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process PUBLIC PROCESS: This closure is subject to the early notiﬁcation process in 21A.10. The following is a list of public input opportunities related to the proposed alleyway closures that have already been performed:• The Planning Division and the Department of Public Lands provided a 45-day comment period (5/21/2025-7/5/2025) to the Ballpark and Central Ninth Community Councils.• Early notiﬁcation notices were mailed May 27, 2025, to all property owners and residents within 300 ft. of both the alleyway and portion of the alleyway proposed to be closed(Exhibit 4).• A sign notice of the proposed closure was posted at the property on May 27, 2025.• An online open house was posted to the Planning Division's webpage on June 3, 2025, and will remain open until the City Council has made a decision on the proposal.As of the date of this transmittal, Planning and Public Lands staﬀ have not received any public comment on the proposed alleyway closure.State Code noticing requirements for this process include a mailed notice to the owners of abutting properties at least 4 weeks in advance of the hearing and notice to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) of the upcoming hearing.• Notice of the proposal was sent to the abutting property owners December 15, 2025. A copy of this notice is included in Exhibit 4.• Notice to UDOT and abutting property owners of the public hearing will be sent by Council Staﬀ ahead of the hearing. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor Kim Shelley Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 www.slc.gov/parks/ PHONE 801-972-7800 FAX 801-972-7847 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Salt Lake City Public Lands Department is requesting the City Council adopt an ordinance to indefinitely close a 16-foot wide north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15-foot wide east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision, Plat C, Salt Lake City Survey (see Exhibit “A” within the attached Exhibit 1). The purpose of the closure is to consolidate all parcels that make up Jefferson Park into one parcel to facilitate park improvements that are being funded by the Parks. Trails. & Open Space General Obligation Bond (GO Bond) and Capital Improvement Project (CIP) funding. Both alleyways were established when the subdivision in which they are located (West Boulevard Subdivision) was created in 1889. • The alleyway running east/west at mid-block between West Temple and 200 West will only be partially closed because homes along the south side of Goltz Avenue utilize the western extents of the alleyway (outside the park boundary and west of the alleyway in question in this transmittal) as an access to rear structures. The proposed closure for the eastern extent of this alleyway is 100 feet in length by 15 feet in width. • The alleyway running north/south through Jefferson Park from West Goltz Avenue (on the north) to West Fremont Avenue (on the south) will be entirely closed and is 275 feet in length and 16 feet in width. Both the alleyway portion (east/west) and the entire alleyway (north/south) to be closed are located fully within the boundaries of Jefferson Park. They appear to exist only on paper and haven’t been used as a vehicular public right-of-way since at least the mid-1980s when the park and basin were established. There are no properties that rely on this alleyway for access. The alleyway and alleyway portion in question have been fully incorporated into a grassy field in Jefferson Park. If the alleyways are closed, they will continue to be part of Jefferson Park. Jefferson Park was selected as one of the Reimagine Neighborhood Parks projects (at least one in each Council district) that would receive funding from the GO Bond. The completed project will feature new and improved amenities that are prioritized by residents and celebrate the community this park serves. This project is in the early design stage. Although the final design hasn't been determined yet, building permit reviews and issuances (especially by Public Utilities) can be complicated if structures or improvements cross property lines and/or encroach into public rights-of- way. Because of this, these portions of alleyway rights-of-way within Jefferson Park must be vacated , and all the parcels consolidated, to facilitate the Salt Lake City Public Lands Department’s acquisition of building permits for any new amenities or improvements to the park. The alleyway closure process is regulated by State Code 72-5-105 (4), (5), and (7), which requires the City Council to hold a public hearing on this matter and adopt an ordinance to indefinitely close the alleyway and portion of an alleyway. The City Council may indefinitely close them and legally convert to another public use (Jefferson Park, existing), if they find that at least one of the following conditions exists: ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor Kim Shelley Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 www.slc.gov/parks/ PHONE 801-972-7800 FAX 801-972-7847 A. The alleyway and alleyway portion to be closed are not necessary for vehicular travel; B. The closure is necessary to correct or mitigate injury to private or public land resources on or near the alleyway and alleyway portion to be closed; or C. The closure of the alleyway and alleyway portion is necessary to mitigate unsafe conditions. In this case, condition “A” would apply to Public Lands’ request since the alleyway and alleyway portion proposed for closure have not been used for vehicular public right-of-way for several decades and no nearby properties rely on them for access. Additionally, they serve as part of a detention basin for Public Utilities and are fully incorporated into Jefferson Park. Because of these reasons, the City Council may find that the alleyway and alleyway portion to be closed are not necessary for or currently useable for vehicular travel, and that the proposed closure is warranted. PUBLIC PROCESS: This closure is subject to the early notification process in 21A.10. The following is a list of public input opportunities related to the proposed alleyway closures that have already been performed: • The Planning Division and the Department of Public Lands provided a 45-day comment period (5/21/2025-7/5/2025) to the Ballpark and Central Ninth Community Councils. • Early notification notices were mailed May 27, 2025, to all property owners and residents within 300 ft. of both the alleyway and portion of the alleyway proposed to be closed (Exhibit 4). • A sign notice of the proposed closure was posted at the property on May 27, 2025. • An online open house was posted to the Planning Division's webpage on June 3, 2025, and will remain open until the City Council has made a decision on the proposal. As of the date of this transmittal, Planning and Public Lands staff have not received any public comment on the proposed alleyway closure. State Code noticing requirements for this process include a mailed notice to the owners of abutting properties at least 4 weeks in advance of the hearing and notice to the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) of the upcoming hearing. • Notice of the proposal was sent to the abutting property owners December 15, 2025. A copy of this notice is included in Exhibit 4. • Notice to UDOT and abutting property owners of the public hearing will be sent by Council Staff ahead of the hearing. EXHIBITS 1. Ordinance adopting the indefinite closure 2. Legal description and map of the alleyway and portion of alleyway proposed to be closed 3. Survey ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor Kim Shelley Director of Public Lands PUBLIC LANDS DEPARTMENT 1965 WEST 500 SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84104 www.slc.gov/parks/ PHONE 801-972-7800 FAX 801-972-7847 4. Notice of the proposed alleyway closure sent by staff to abutting property owners 5. Notice of City Council public hearing 6. Mailing list This page has intentionally been left blank Legal Description of Proposed Indefinite Closure of an Alleyway and Portion of an Alleyway Closing a 16 foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15 foot east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision, as recorded in Book B, Page 62, in the Salt Lake County Recorders Office. Said closure being described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of Lot 15, Block 1, West Boulevard Subdivision, as recorded in Book B, Page 62, in the Salt Lake County Recorders Office, and running thence South 15 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 54, said Block 1; thence East 100 feet to the Northeast Corner of Lot 57, said Block 1; thence South 130 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Lot 57; thence East 16 feet to the Southwest Corner of Lot 1, said Block 1; thence North 275 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 11, said Block 1; thence West 16 feet to the Northeast Corner of Lot 12, said Block 1; thence South 130 feet to the Southeast Corner of said Lot 12; thence West 100 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 5,900 square feet, or 0.135 acres. This page has intentionally been left blank TC C J O B N U M B E R : 1 DA T E S U B M I T T E D : 1588 SOUTH MAIN STREET SUITE 200 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84115 801.743.1300 ” ” ” ” ” ”” ” EY AH 9679988 ROBERT RV DAN SU OR F P ETTSA FO UT SE NOIS L RO AL LAW This page has intentionally been left blank Notification of a nearby Alley Closure request Dear Property Owner or Resident, You are receiving this notice because your property is directly adjacent to the alley that is requested to be closed. Request Description: Amy Reid (Salt Lake City Department of Public Lands) is requesting to indefinitely close (see image below) for the purpose of converting an alley and portion of an alley into another public use (Jefferson Park). This part of the alley does not currently serve as access for nearby residents to their properties or to the park, and it has been fully incorporated into Jefferson Park as part of a detention basin managed by Public Utilities which have made it unusable as a public right-of- way. The applicant is requesting this closure so that all property that makes up Jefferson Park can be consolidated into one parcel in preparation for park improvements. Alley Closure: Closing an alley in this manner is regulated by State Code 72-5-105 (4). (5). and (7). which requires the request to be heard at a public hearing (City Council) and the alley closed by adopting an ordinance. In addition to this, notice of the request must be sent to UDOT and abutting property owners at least 4 weeks in advance of the public hearing date. To comply with these requirements, a public hearing will not be scheduled until after: January 12, 2026 You will receive an additional notice of the City Council public hearing date once it has been scheduled. The purpose of this notice is to make you aware of the request and let you know how you may obtain more information and provide comments. If you would like additional information or if you have comments, please contact the project manager – Amy Reid, Associate Landscape Architect, Public Lands, at (801) 360-0614 or amy.reid@slc.gov. This page has intentionally been left blank NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Public Lands Department is requesting the City Council adopt an ordinance to indefinitely close a16 foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15 foot east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision, Plat C, Salt Lake City Survey (see Exhibit 1). The purpose of the closure is to consolidate all parcels that make up Jefferson Park into one parcel to facilitate park improvements that are being funded by the Parks Trails & Open Space General Obligation Bond (GO Bond) and constituent Capital Improvement Project funding. The portions of the alleyways proposed for closure do not provide nearby residents with access to their properties or to the park and have been fully incorporated into Jefferson Park as part of a detention basin managed by Public Utilities which have made it unusable as a public right-of-way. The applicant is requesting the closure so that all property that makes up Jefferson Park can be consolidated into one parcel to facilitate future park improvements. The subject alleyways are located within Council District 5, represented by Erika Carlsen. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. DATE: [ ], at 7:00 PM PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Roon 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slc.gov. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Amy Reid at 801.330.0614 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or via e-mail at amy.reid@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at www.bit.ly/citizenaccess, by selecting the “planning” tab and entering the petition number [enter number]. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slc.gov, 801- 535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank OWN_FULL_NAME OWN_ADDR own_unit OWN_CITY OWN_STATOWN_ZIP ABBEY BENTLEY; MICHAEL ABERMAN (JT) BERMAN (JT)1138 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ADAM SAPERS ADAM SAPERS 1052 S WESTTEMPLE ST # 1 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ALLIE R SHAPIRO E R SHAPIRO 1420 PEERLESS PL APT 123 LOS ANGELES CA 90035 CAITLIN ARNWINE; MATTHEW ARNWINE (JT) RNWINE (JT)1120 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CARL CONNELLY RL CONNELLY 2263 E HIGH MOUNTAIN DR SANDY UT 84092 CARLETON J ALLEN TON J ALLEN 128 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 CARY ALLEN WILLIAMSON; TAMMY ANN CASSITY ANN CAS 9938 S TULIP DR WHITE CITY UT 84094 CHARLES EDWIN BUTTON DWIN BUTTON 1052 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 COATES FAMILY INVESTING, LLC ESTING, LLC PO BOX 526344 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 COLLABORATIVE 1135 GP, LLC 135 GP, LLC 513 W 2600 S BOUNTIFUL UT 84010 Current Occupant 1075 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1062 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 168 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1043 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 124 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1042 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1068 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1061 S JEFFERSON ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1058 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1064 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1048 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1052 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1095 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1101 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1103 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1107 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 175 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 167 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 163 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 159 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 149 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 147 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 125 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 121 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 168 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 158 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 154 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 148 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 142 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 136 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 130 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 126 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 122 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 110 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1089 S 200 W Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 185 W GOLTZ AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 163 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 157 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 151 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 145 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 166 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 160 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 134 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 128 W PAXTON AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 36 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1099 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1117 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1135 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1116 S RICHARDS ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1159 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1146 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1144 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1142 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1140 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1138 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1136 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1134 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1132 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1130 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1128 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1126 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1124 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1122 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1120 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 1118 S WEST TEMPLE ST Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 121 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 127 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 131 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT Current Occupant 125 W FREMONT AVE Salt Lake City 84101 UT DALE WINETEER TRUST SHARE 01/14/1999 01/14/1999 132 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DAN O GARZARELLI GARZARELLI 950 HARBOR AVE HENDERSON NV 89002 DARIN MANO; KEVIN RANDALL (JT) ANDALL (JT)620 E 1700 S # 8 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 DARIN MASAO MANO MASAO MANO 709 E HARRISON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 DARREN GONZOL; TARA MLEYNEK (JT) LEYNEK (JT)125 W FREMONT AVE # 119 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DAVID M BEMIS VID M BEMIS 8479 S 1380 E SANDY UT 84093 DAVID P MIDGLEY D P MIDGLEY 1051 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DAVID WULF & AARON NELSON LIVING TRUST 01/01/2018 2845 S IMPERIAL ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DE ANZA-C9 LP ANZA-C9 LP 960 N SAN ANTONIO RD LOS ALTOS CA 94022 DENNIS ALEXANDER TROP XANDER TROP 1132 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 DIV OF FACILITIES STATE OF UT STATE OF UT 450 N STATE OFFICE BLDG SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 DOMINION INVESTMENTS LLC STMENTS LLC 2223 S HIGHLAND DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DOUGLAS FLAGER; MARCUS WRIGHT (JT) WRIGHT (JT)134 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ESTEBAN R. TINOCO; SOPHIE R. TINOCO E R. TINOCO 4628 W 4695 S WEST VALLEY UT 84120 GUADALUPE FLORES LUPE FLORES 1091 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HENRY S MASTAIN Y S MASTAIN 131 W FREMONT AVE # 122 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY 1776 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 JAMES C TAYLOR; JESSICA M TAYLOR (JT) TAYLOR (JT)3556 S 5600 W # 1-533 WEST VALLEY UT 84120 JAMIE L THORPE IE L THORPE 1058 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JENIFER F NELSON ER F NELSON 1126 S WESTTEMPLE ST #112 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JERROD J ROWAN ROD J ROWAN 16 CHURCH AVE ROSCOE NY 12776 JESSA TUMINEZ; ANDRE LONARDO (JT) ONARDO (JT)162 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JESSE C WALKER; MARK HOFELING (JT) FELING (JT)127 W FREMONT AVE # 120 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JG ROWHAUS, LLC OWHAUS, LLC 4035 W 58TH PL LOS ANGELES CA 90043 JKBRT; GRBRT KBRT; GRBRT 639 MOUNTAIN VIEW CIR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 JOB G GOWON JOB G GOWON 145-147 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOHN A KANE; CAROLINE O KANE (JT) O KANE (JT)122 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JOSEPH L HERNANDEZ L HERNANDEZ 1047 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JUAN R BUSTAMANTE; GRISELDA A RAMIREZ (JT) AMIREZ (139 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 JULIE R MCMAHON E R MCMAHON 1136 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KATHLEEN LOIS COCHRAN REVOCABLE TRUST 09-03-2008 0680 E 100 S # 201 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 KATHLEEN MCKEON LEEN MCKEON 1128 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KATHRYN A CAUSEY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 05/07/2024 923 LONGLEAF DR NORTH SALT LAKE UT 84054 KATHRYN MURDOCK; RICHARD T MURDOCK; RUTH MURDO 138 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 KIM ORLANDINI; FLAVIO ORLANDINI (JT) ANDINI (JT)5951 W JUNIPER ACRES CT WEST VALLEY UT 84128 KRISHEILA OCAMPO EILA OCAMPO 123 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LEAH THOMAS LEAH THOMAS 353 E 1500 N OREM UT 84057 LEE ANDERSON EE ANDERSON 137 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LERNICE CABRERA ICE CABRERA 1056 S JEFFERSON ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 LISA MERICAL ISA MERICAL 206 CHOCTAW DR MONTGOMERY AL 36117 MARCUS MCBRIDE CUS MCBRIDE 133 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MARGARET GOERTZEN ET GOERTZEN 138 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 MORTENSEN-MAHYERA LIVING TRUST 01/05/2017 01/05/21122 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 N C CARRIDO INC CARRIDO INC 1085 N NOCTURNE DR SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 NATHAN THOMAS PASKETT; ADAM TROY WHITE (JT) WHIT 129 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 NICTE-HA REZA; OMAR REZA ; OMAR REZA 1048 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PASCUAL CARDENAS; MARIA T PEREZ (JT) PEREZ (JT)1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PATRICK L. HADLEY; KAREN MAYBURY (JT) AYBURY (JT)152 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PATRICK QUINN; ERIN HAMILTON (JT) MILTON (JT)1124 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 PDG JEFFERSON, LLC; POWELL DEVELOPMWNT GROUP, LL 135 W GOLTZ AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 ROWHAUS CONDOMINIUMS HOWMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIO 262 E 3900 S # 200 MURRAY UT 84107 SALT LAKE CITY CORP E CITY CORP PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 SALT LAKE CITY T LAKE CITY 1530 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84115 SCOTT SORENSON TT SORENSON 121 W FREMONT AVE # 17 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SHEILA WILLSON ILA WILLSON 1144 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SLOAN URRY SLOAN URRY 1130 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 SOMEWHERE OTR, LLC RE OTR, LLC PO BOX 9874 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84109 STEVEN CHASE ADAMS CHASE ADAMS 1042 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TAG SLC, LLC AG SLC, LLC PO BOX 520697 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84152 TANGUY MARQUIS GUY MARQUIS 156 W PAXTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TERESA PEREZ; PASCUAL CARDENAS (JT) RDENAS (JT)1121 S 200 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 THREE BIRDS, LLC BIRDS, LLC 169 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 TRUST NOT IDENTIFIED IDENTIFIED 680 E 100 S # 201 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102 WHITNEY MARIE FINLINSON E FINLINSON 135 W FREMONT AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 WILLIAM M III CUTTING; WILLIAM JR CUTTING; AMY B CU 1146 S WESTTEMPLE ST SALT LAKE CITY UT 84101 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2026 (Closing a 16 foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15 foot east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision) An ordinance closing a 16 foot north/south alleyway and a portion of a 15 foot east/west alleyway in Block 1 of the West Boulevard Subdivision. WHEREAS, the subject alleyways are located within the West Boulevard Subdivision of Block 1 and within the bounds of Jefferson Park; WHEREAS, the affected portions of the alleyways are not presently used for travel or as a public right-of-way, rather, both are primarily covered by turf and serving dual purposes as parts of a detention basin and recreational area in Jefferson Park, WHEREAS, Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(7) allows a municipality to indefinitely close public rights of way to vehicular travel and convert rights of way to another public use after following the procedures specified under Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(5), which requires the city to hold a public hearing on the indefinite closure and provide notice of the proposed closure to the Utah Department of Transportation and abutting property owners; and WHEREAS, the city has complied with the procedures set forth in Utah Code Subsection 72-5-105(5); and WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the indefinite closure of the alleyways described herein because they have not been used for vehicular traffic for several decades and are not necessary to access private property and, therefore, are not necessary for vehicular travel; and WHEREAS , closing the alleyways will not be adverse to the general public’s interest because the closures will facilitate improvements to Jefferson Park, which will further the public interest in open space and recreation; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Indefinitely Closing City-Owned Right-of-Way. That the north/south alleyway and east/west portion of the alleyway in the West Boulevard Subdivision of Block 1, and which are more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby are closed as public rights-of-way and declared not presently necessary or available for use as public rights-of- way. The alleyways are hereby converted to another public use, specifically, for park purposes. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above closures are expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of the alleyways, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said closures are also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this _______ day of ______________, 202_. ______________________________ CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ______________________________ CITY RECORDER Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ CITY RECORDER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: April 20, 2026 By: Cameron Johnson Cameron Johnson Senior City Attorney Bill No. ________ of 202_. Published: ______________. Ordinance closing alley in Jefferson Park_v2 This page has intentionally been left blank Item C1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Austin Kimmel, Kira Luke, Allison Rowland, Sylvia Richards, Michael Sanders, and Kate Werrett DATE:June 9, 2026 RE: FY26 BUDGET AMENDMENT No.5 MOTION 1 – ADOPT REMAINING ITEMS AND CLOSE THE BUDGET AMENDMENT I move that the Council adopt the remaining items in the budget amendment as proposed by the Administration and close the budget amendment. Note: On June 2, 2026, the City Council adopted: A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT REMAINING ITEMS AND CLOSE THE BUDGET AMENDMENT I move that the Council not adopt the remaining items in the budget amendment as proposed by the Administration and close the budget amendment. MOTION 3 – DEFER ACTION TO A FUTURE COUNCIL MEETING I move that the Council continue discussion on this item and defer action to a future council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Austin Kimmel, Kira Luke, Allison Rowland, Sylvia Richards, Michael Sanders, and Kate Werrett DATE:June 2, 2026 RE: FY26 BUDGET AMENDMENT #5 View the Administration’s proposal NEW INFORMATION At its Tuesday, May 19 meeting, the Council was briefed on all but one item in sections A: New Items, D: Housekeeping, and G: Council Consent Agenda. The Council also took a straw poll, as requested by the administration on item A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues, and indicated support for the funding. The following is new information learned since the publication of the May 19, 2026 version of the staff report: New Item Added in Updated Administrative Transmittal D-13: Civic Center Public Realm and Recreation Improvements – Rescope of Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation CIP Funding (CIP: One-Time, $0.00) The Administration resubmitted Budget Amendment No. 5 with an additional item, which is a budget- neutral rescope of $3 million approved CIP funding for the Civic Campus (which encompasses Washington Square and Library Square) and Green Loop implementation. The current scope is limited to the public-right-of-way improvements along 200 East between Washington Square and Library Square. This amendment would expand the eligible use of those funds to also include improvements to the interior block of the Civic Center campus, including a potential playground, plaza, gathering space, and other improvements. Schedule: Page | 2 Council Added Item Last April, when the Council adopted the federal housing and community development grants and city Funding Our Future (FOF) housing programs, they also agreed to allocate $255,000 from Funding Our Future fund balance to item 21 on the FOF list, Housing Case Management. This item was inadvertently omitted from the May 19 staff report and has been added here to reflect the Council's direction to include it in Budget Amendment No. 5. The amount listed in the original staff report and on page 17 of the administrative transmittal was incorrect at $2.5 million. The correct amount is $2,583,931. The additional $83,931 was added at the last minute before the request was transmitted. Elsewhere in the transmittal, it is correct. This figure has been adjusted in the report below and in Attachment 1: New Ongoing Costs to the General Fund. D-5: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant Funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South Council Member Puy asked for more details on the specific location of the 700 South railroad crossing. Staff from the Finance Department followed up with the Transportation Division, who shared that the project is at the at-grade railroad crossing at 4900 West 700 South. According to the narrative provided for the grant, this segment is the last stretch of 700 South to be improved with new concrete pavement, bike lanes, curb and gutter, and pedestrian sidewalk. The current crossing conditions and the skew of the crossing to road pose a safety risk for vehicular traffic, rail cars, and travelers who are walking, biking, or rolling. Also, according to the narrative, the safety improvements for this project include: 1.) widening the roadway, 2.) raising the street grade approach to improve sight distance, 3.) replacing the crossing signals and arms, 4.) new concrete crossing panels, 5.) new pedestrian sidewalk on the southwest side of the road, 6.) addition of bicycle lane striping, and 7.) relocating and upgrading the crossing control house due to the widening of the roadway. The following information was provided for the May 19 Council meeting. It is provided again for background purposes. Budget Amendment No. 5 includes 27 proposed amendments, with $104,313,768 in revenues and $112,259,130 in expenditures, including $49,547,961.04 from the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in 11 funds and adds 13.0 FTEs for the Police Department. Page | 3 If the Budget Amendment is approved by the Council, the available fund balance will be 16.48% of the FY26 Adopted Budget. This is 3.48% or $17,838,787 above the 13% minimum Council policy target. Updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages are found in the table on page 2 of this report. Goal of the briefing: To review the proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Amendment No. 5 for Salt Lake City and consider approving the amendments following a public hearing. STRAW POLL REQUESTS The Administration has requested straw polls for item A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues so the Police Department may facilitate hiring for the May 2026 academy class. POLICY QUESTIONS The following policy questions are related to item D-6: CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements. Additional details on page 7 of the staff report. The Council may wish to consider discussing with the Administration the below questions 1. Beyond lighting improvements on North Temple and the Jordan River Trail, what additional CPTED interventions are planned with this allocation (e.g., landscaping, sightline improvements, access control, or other environmental design measures)? 2. Which specific locations or “hotspots” have been identified for CPTED improvements, and what measurable or visible changes should residents expect in those areas? 3. What progress has been made on the previously approved $300,000 Jordan River Trail CPTED allocation, including project status, expenditures to date, timeline, and whether the project remains on UPDATED FUND BALANCE CHART Page | 4 IMPACT FEE UNALLOCATED “AVAILABLE TO SPEND” BALANCES AND REFUND TRACKING The table below is current as of February 28, 2026. Impact fees must be encumbered or spent within six years of the City receiving them. Expired impact fees must be returned to the entity that paid them with interest over the intervening six years. Type Unallocated Cash “Available to Spend” Next Refund Trigger Date $ Expiring in FY2028 Police $1,735,106 More than two years away - Parks $8,644,984 More than two years away - Fire $994,408 More than two years away - Transportation $2,601,362 More than two years away - Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract REVENUE UPDATE The Administration provided the following table with updated revenue details. Page | 5 ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION Section A: New Items A-1: Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade (Airport: Ongoing, $20,000) The Airport is recruiting a new Director of Finance (CFO). Under the direction of the national recruiting firm, to enhance the search, the Airport is changing the pay grade from A03 to A02. The additional funds will go towards the position’s salary allocation. A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues (General Fund: One-time, $2,583,931 $2,500,000; General Fund: Ongoing, $2,583,931 $2,500,000;; IMS: One-time, $103,700; Fleet Fund: One-time, $748,500) The Police Department is requesting approval for funding through an interlocal agreement with the Utah Inland Port Authority (UIPA) to support 12 sworn positions and one civilian position with associated supplies, equipment, and vehicles to support public safety operations in and around the Inland Port. Additionally, they are requesting a straw poll. The requested straw poll would allow the department to begin hiring for the May 2026 police academy class. If approved, recruits are expected to complete academy and field training and be fully deployed by March 2027. Under the proposal, the City will receive from UIPA $5.0 million in funding during the current fiscal year, with an additional $2.5 million anticipated in future fiscal years. The 12 sworn positions will consist of two Sergeants and 10 Officers and would be organized into two squads of one Sergeant and five Officers each. The civilian position would serve as an Evidence Technician responsible for Page | 6 evidence booking, storage, handling, and release. This role is intended to support officers operating in an area that experiences high levels of property crime and thefts, which comes with increased evidence management demands. A-3: Workers Compensation Premium (General Fund: Ongoing, $1,731,829.00) A-4: New Fund: Library Pass-Through (General Fund: Ongoing, $33,195,704) A-5: CRA Pass-Through True-Up (General Fund: Ongoing, $4,536,141) A-6: CRA Pass-Through to the Library (General Fund: One-Time, $2,311,032) A-7: Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums (Risk Fund: Ongoing, $1,710,000.00) Page | 7 Now that there are two years of premium data to aid in the WCF calculations, the Attorney's Office anticipates more refined predictions and accurate budgeting for premiums and outstanding claims going forward. A-8: Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles (General Fund: One-time, ($1,001,800); General Fund: One-time, $1,001,800; Fleet Fund: one-time, $1,001,800) Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources None Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope (General Fund: One-time, $0) Page | 8 D-2: Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvement (CIP: One-time, $4,489,610.79) When the revenue associated with these projects was recognized in the CIP fund, the corresponding amount also had to be recorded as an expense. Although the funds were not initially allocated to any specific project, they were still reflected as an expense in the fund. As a result, once the funds were later allocated to individual projects, it created the appearance of double-counting the expense. The funds were not allocated to the Old Library, Plaza 349, or the Justice Court projects until FY2026 BA 4. This amendment corrects the double expensing of the funds. This housekeeping item has two parts: First, $453,592 would be transferred from Sustainability’s Waste & Recycling Division Fund balance to the Environment & Energy Division Fund balance. In FY25, IMS charges to the department were incorrectly coded to the Environment & Energy Division. This amendment correctly allocates the Waste & Recycling Division’s share of those charges. Second, $902,186 would be transferred from the General Fund to the Refuse Fund for the Utah Renewable Communities (URC), as approved by the Council at its April 21 meeting. Salt Lake City is the lead participant in the URC program. Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) requires a participating agency to sign a contract backstopping the software and administrative startup costs. These costs are expected to be recovered from ratepayer revenues once the program launches, meaning the City’s financial obligation will be temporary. The item will result in a cash balance of $4.9 million, or 15% of operating expenditures in the Refuse fund. This amount would be withdrawn from Parks Impact Fees and used for the acquisition of just over one acre of park space. A closed session will be required to discuss this item. In 2023, the Council approved the FY2022 Railroad Safety Grant in Consent Agenda No. 8 for improvements to a railroad crossing at 700 South. At the time of the grant award, the revenue was recognized but the expenditure budget wasn’t created. This amendment moves $101,005 to CIP. This item relates to Item E-3 which receives the funding in CIP and creates the expenditure budget. The budget will be loaded with other 700 South project budgets. The Administration is proposes a one-time transfer of $200,000 from the Mayor’s Office to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) fund to support Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) initiatives. This would bring the total CPTED project budget to $500,000 when combined with the previously allocated $300,000 in CIP funding. According to the Administration, the intent of the amendment is to consolidate funding and allow the resources to remain available beyond the current fiscal year. The primary focus areas include high-priority "hotspots" identified in the Public Safety Plan, with a specific emphasis on expanding streetlighting infrastructure and optimizing urban landscaping The Administration anticipates approximately $70,000 of the new funding will support LED streetlight upgrades along North Page | 9 Temple, while the remaining balance will be directed toward lighting improvements along the Jordan River corridor. POLICY QUESTIONS D-7: Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer (Impact Fee: One-time, $1,814,796.04; General Fund: One-time, $1,814,796.04; CIP: One-time: $443,705.06; Impact Fee: One-time, $0) This is a request for Excess Capacity to be paid out of Streets Impact Fees to the General Fund in the amount of $1,814,796. The Administration is also requesting to subsequently transfer funds from the General fund to Streets Impact Fees in the amount of $989,253 Parks Impact Fees in the amount of $1,112,238, Fire Impact Fees in the amount of $137,307, and Police Impact Fees in the amount of $19,702, for a total of $2,258,501. These transfers are to pay the Impact Fee funds interest earned on related fund balance amounts but were mistakenly paid to the General Fund in error. The difference of $443,705 in transfers from General Fund CIP to Impact Fees not covered by the $1,814,796 will be covered by excess CIP funds. Note: Impact Fees in general cannot be transferred to the General Fund. This is the exception. Excess Capacity was approved within the IFFP. Excess capacity is capacity previously built into the system that is in excess of the level of service, that can accommodate growth. Impact fee will buy into this excess capacity and effectively reimburse the General Fund for this prior investment. D-8: CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction (CIP: One-time, $6,786,000) FY2020 BA 6 - $2,000,000 & FY: In 2020, after the earthquake, $2,000,000 was allocated to cover insured costs. Via FY2023 BA 5, an additional $2,650,000 was also allocated to reimbursable repairs. These funds were reimbursed and need to be transferred to the General Fund. $800,000 of a 2022 General Fund transfer to CIP was unused and is proposed to be returned to the General Fund. $1,366,000 of CIP fund interest to be transferred to the General Fund. D-9: General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds (Debt Service: One-time, $1,062,474; CIP: One-time, $49,336,400) D-10: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Supplied CIP Budget (CIP: One-time, $895,004) Page | 10 This item provides $894,004 in CIP funding from a Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) grant to expand Green Bike stations in the city. Salt Lake City would receive funding from federal aid highway funds managed and distributed by UDOT. D-11: Moving Mayor's Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor's Office (General Fund: One-time, ($580,000); $580,000) D-12: Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets (CIP: One-time, ($2,000,000); Misc. Grants: One-time ($2,000,000); Misc. Grants: One-time, $2,000,000; Stormwater: One-time, $0.00) Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Green Bike Expansion (Misc Grants: One-time, $895,004) E-2: COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant (Misc Grants: One-time, $500,000) ∼ $292,950 ∼ $50,730 Page | 11 • Local and department training in de-escalation and crisis response ∼ $111,825 • Overtime for staff providing and receiving training ∼ $44,495 A public hearing on the grant was held 9/2/2025 E-3: Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022 (Misc Grants: One-time, $101,005) This item relates to D-5. It receives the $101,005 in CIP and creates the expenditure budget. For more information, please refer to Item D-5. E-4: Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant (Misc Grants: One-time, $26,000) This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $26,000 for the purpose of providing nutritious snacks to Youth City program participants. This is a renewal grant from the Utah State Board of Education Chile and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) grant program to provide snacks to Youth City participants. Public hearing is scheduled for 3/24/2026 E-5: Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant (Misc Grants: One-time, $1,000,000) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $1,000,000 for the purpose of providing design services for the Civic Center area of downtown Salt Lake City. This funding will be used for a design consultant to develop construction documents for public bidding. The design will consider and respond to the larger network of Civic Center District public spaces, transportation needs and the Downtown neighborhood. Public hearing was held 9/2/2025 E-6: International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services (Misc Grants: One-time, $20,000) This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $20,000 for International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services mini-grant. The funds would be used for supplies for outreach items, travel training costs for victim advocate team. Public hearing was held 1/13/2026 Section G: Council Consent Agenda – Grant Awards G-1: Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting Project (Misc Grants: One-time, $600,000) The City Creek Daylighting project will convert a culverted section of City Creek along the Folsom Trail into an open waterway and enhanced public corridor in the Fairpark neighborhood. Funding will finalize construction documents and prepare the project for phased implementation, building on prior design work and a $150,000 investment from the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency. Shaped through extensive community engagement and environmental planning, the project is positioned to advance toward construction. These grant funds are from the Utah Division of Outdoor Recreation Outdoor Recreation Initiative. The city and CRA are collaborating with Seven Canyons Trust on this City Creek Daylighting Project. Page | 12 ATTACHMENTS 1. Ongoing Costs to the General Fund ARPA – American Rescue Plan Act BA – Budget Amendment CACFP – Child and Adult Care Food Program CAN – Community and Neighborhoods Department CIP – Capital Improvement Program CIT – Crisis Intervention Team CM/GC – Construction Manager/General Contractor COPS – Community Oriented Policing Services CRA – Community Reinvestment Agency CPF – Community Project Funding CPTED – Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency FTE – Full-Time Employee IACP – International Association of Chiefs of Police ICAT – Integrated Communications, Assessment, and Tactics IFFP – Impact Fee Facilities Plan IMS – Information Management Services ORI – Outdoor Recreation Initiative POU – Public Order Unit RMP – Rocky Mountain Power TRCC – Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport Grant TY – Tax Year UDOT – Utah Department of Transportation UIPA – Utah Inland Port Authority URC – Utah Renewable Communities WCF – Workers Compensation Fund of Utah Council staff has provided the following list of potential new ongoing costs to the General Fund. Many of these are new FTE’s approved during this fiscal year’s budget amendments, noting that each new FTE increases the City’s annual budget costs if positions are added to the staffing document. Page | 13 BAM#2 D-3 IMS Fund Budget Carry Forward $159,414 Ongoing -0- CCAC recommended funding for multiple departments to address compensation for positions lagging behind market rate. Changes & funding weren’t included in annual budget. BAM#2 D-4 Language Access Transfer from Mayor’s Office $50,000 Ongoing -0- Contract language access services funding was inadvertently left out of IMS budget when it was transferred from Mayor’s to IMS during the annual budget. BAM#3 None. BAM#4 A-3: Wildland Firefighting Expansion Funding $88,000 One-Time, $75,000 Ongoing -0- Reflects additional resources needed for red flag days. A-13: Funding for Gap in Homeless Resource Center Grant Funding for Salaries $292,833 Ongoing -0- The State HRC grant funding was reduced by $292,833. Funding to maintain the HRC functionality levels matches the reduction. A-17: Justice Court, City Prosecutor's Office and Legal Defenders Association (LDA) Staffing Increases $1,554,826 Ongoing 8 Annualized, the additional FY2027 staffing costs are $1,554,826. BAM #5 A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues $2,583,931 $2,500,000; Ongoing 13 Funding for positions is through the 2029 tax year, with the potential for continuation through future amendments beyond 2030. Due to the timing of the receipt of funding and recruitment efforts, expenditures will only be partially realized in FY26, requiring a budget carryforward for the unspent balance into FY27. A-3: Workers Compensation Premium $1,731,829 Ongoing The FY26 budget included the increase to the Risk Fund, but did not include the expense from Non-Departmental. This is a housekeeping item to account for the corresponding transfer. Page | 14 A-4: New Fund: Library Pass-Through (General Fund: Ongoing, $33,195,704) $33,195,704 Ongoing This amendment includes the revenue and expenditure for the transfer of funds to the Library. A-5: CRA Pass- Through True-Up (General Fund: Ongoing, $4,536,141) $4,536,141 Ongoing This is a true-up of the revenue that passes through the General Fund prior to being transferred to the CRA. A-7: Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums $1,710,000 Ongoing This addresses underbudgeting from the FY25 transition to a premium-based workers compensation plan. The request covers three areas: a $255,000 premium shortfall, an $800,000 true-up after WCF underestimated the City's gross wages, and $655,000 for legacy claims that were unresolved at the time of transition and are not covered by current premiums. TOTAL $45,889,678 $45,805,747 SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 05/26/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/26/2026 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 05/26/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 05/26/2026 Subject: FY26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal New transmittal or Revision New transmittal Revision Revision Updates: Added item D-13, pertaining to a rescope of the Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation CIP Funding Additional Staff Contact: Randy Hillier, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Randy Hillier randy.hillier@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2026 adopted budget Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $46,941,604 in revenue and $49,547,961 in expenses in the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in eleven (11) funds, with a total revenue increase of $104,313,768 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $112,259,130. The proposal includes the addition of thirteen (13) general fund-funded positions. Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing NA Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 5/26/2026 Alejandro Puy, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #5- Retransmittal SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Randy Hillier DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $46,941,604.04 $49,574,961.04 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 20,000.00 IMPACT FEES 2,258,501.10 2,219,796.04 IMS FUND 103,700.00 103,700.00 FLEET FUND 2,251,500.00 2,251,500.00 CIP FUND 44,042,798.21 51,272,503.27 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 REFUSE COLLECTION FUND 902,186.00 902,186.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 0.00 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,041,004.00 3,142,009.00 RISK FUND 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 TOTAL $104,313,767.95 $112,259,129.95 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2026. Based on revenue data across the first part of the fiscal year, it is projected that revenues will be realized at approximately $3,378,864 beyond the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. Revenue FY26 Annual Budget FY26 Amended Budget Projection Amended Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) Property Taxes 148,580,334 148,580,334 148,580,334 - Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 126,026,000 126,026,000 125,360,000 (666,000) Franchise Taxes 17,220,000 17,220,000 17,140,000 (80,000) Total Taxes 291,826,334 291,826,334 291,080,334 (746,000) Charges For Services 6,686,820 6,686,820 5,006,431 (1,680,389) Fines & Forfeitures 3,085,827 3,220,827 2,977,231 (243,596) Interest Income 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 - Interfund Service Charges 34,569,169 34,569,169 34,774,907 205,738 Intergovernmental Revenue 6,205,000 6,205,000 6,199,278 (5,722) Licenses 21,847,694 21,847,694 22,666,392 818,698 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,838,663 3,838,663 4,484,128 645,465 Parking Meter Revenue 3,273,255 3,273,255 5,018,737 1,745,482 Parking Tickets 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 - Permits 18,981,859 18,981,859 21,730,107 2,748,248 Property Sale Proceeds - - 64,607 64,607 Gain on Property Dispositions - - 2,545 2,545 Rental & Other Income 1,201,460 1,201,460 1,256,254 54,794 Operating Transfers In 24,780,192 24,780,192 24,879,186 98,994 Total W/O Special Tax 135,669,939 135,804,939 140,259,803 4,454,864 Sales Tax Addition 1/2%58,000,000 58,000,000 58,000,000 - Total General Fund 485,496,273 485,631,273 489,340,137 3,708,864 The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #5. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will remain at 16.48 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 19,731,675 104,201,060 142,867,679 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - (18,919,920) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 19,731,675$ 104,201,060$ 123,947,759$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%33.59%22.96%24.19% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) (15,024) (15,024) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 19,731,675 104,186,036 123,932,735 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57% 29.74% 30.99% 33.59% 22.96% 24.18% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (26,864,250) (26,864,250) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (358,000) (358,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) (913,000) (913,000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (8,700,923) (8,700,923) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 46,941,604 46,941,604 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) (49,574,961) (49,574,961) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 19,731,675 104,201,060 123,932,735 19,731,675 64,716,506 84,463,205 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 32.14% 24.87% 25.80% 33.59% 14.26% 16.48% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,745,525 512,495,524 FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $46,941,604 in revenue and $49,547,961 in expenses in the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in eleven (11) funds, with a total revenue increase of $104,313,768 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $112,259,130. The proposal includes the addition of thirteen (13) general fund-funded positions. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2026 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2026. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2026. Published Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Jaysen Oldroyd This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade Airport 0.00 20,000.00 Ongoing - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF 2,583,931.00 2,583,931.00 Ongoing 13.00 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 One-time - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues IMS 103,700.00 103,700.00 One-time - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues Fleet 1,249,700.00 1,249,700.00 One-time - 3 Workers Compensation Premiums GF 0.00 1,731,171.00 Ongoing - 4 New Fund: Library Pass Through GF 33,195,704.00 33,195,704.00 Ongoing - 5 CRA Pass-Through True-up GF 4,536,141.00 4,536,141.00 Ongoing - 6 CRA Pass-Through to the Library GF 2,311,032.00 2,311,032.00 One-time - 7 Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums Risk 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 Ongoing - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF 0.00 (1,001,800.00)One-time - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF 0.00 1,001,800.00 One-time - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles Fleet 1,001,800.00 1,001,800.00 One-time - 1 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope CIP 0.00 0.00 One-time - 2 Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvements CIP (4,489,610.79)(4,489,610.79)One-time - 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs GF 0.00 902,186.00 One-time - 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs Refuse 0.00 (453,592.00)One-time 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs Refuse 902,186.00 1,355,778.00 One-time - 4 Park Land Acquisition Impact Fees 0.00 405,000.00 One-time 5 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South CIP 101,005.00 101,005.00 One-time 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF 0.00 (200,000.00)One-time - 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF 0.00 200,000.00 One-time - 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements CIP 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fees 0.00 1,814,796.04 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer GF 1,814,796.04 1,814,796.04 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer CIP 0.00 443,705.06 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fees 2,258,501.10 0.00 One-time - 8 CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction CIP 0.00 6,786,000.00 One-time - 9 General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds Debt Service 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 One-time - 9 General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds CIP 49,336,400.00 49,336,400.00 One-time - 10 UDOT Green Bike Expansion Grant Supplied CIP Budget CIP 895,004.00 895,004.00 One-time - 11 Moving Mayor's Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 (580,000.00)One-time - 11 Moving Mayor's Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 580,000.00 One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets CIP (2,000,000.00)(2,000,000.00)One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Misc Grants 0.00 (2,000,000.00)One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Misc Grants 0.00 2,000,000.00 One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Storm Water 2,000,000.00 0.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal 13 Civic Center Public Realm and Recreation Improvements - Rescope of Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation CIP Funding CIP 0.00 0.00 One-time - Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 UDOT Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 895,004.00 895,004.00 One-time - 2 COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant Misc Grants 500,000.00 500,000.00 One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022 Misc Grants 0.00 101,005.00 One-time - 4 Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant Misc Grants 26,000.00 26,000.00 One-time - 5 Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant Misc Grants 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 One-time - 6 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services Misc Grants 20,000.00 20,000.00 One-time - Consent Agenda #2 1 Outdoor Recreation Initiative3 (ORI) City Creek Daylighting Project Misc Grants 600,000.00 600,000.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 104,313,767.95 112,259,129.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #5: General Fund GF 46,941,604.04 49,574,961.04 0.00 0.00 13.00 Airport Fund Airport 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Impact Fees 2,258,501.10 2,219,796.04 0.00 0.00 - IMS Fund IMS 103,700.00 103,700.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 2,251,500.00 2,251,500.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 44,042,798.21 51,272,503.27 0.00 0.00 - Debt Service Fund Debt Service 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Collection Fund Refuse 902,186.00 902,186.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,041,004.00 3,142,009.00 0.00 0.00 - Risk Fund Risk 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 0.00 0.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 104,313,767.95 112,259,129.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - - 46,941,604.04 500,663,129.13 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 1,062,474.60 31,577,296.60 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 5,798,741.00 46,301,299.31 105,981,794.35 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 29,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 - 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 1,581,719.00 2,251,500.00 27,758,919.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 1,710,000.00 71,556,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 - 103,700.00 43,206,634.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 8,918,482.00 902,186.00 35,289,791.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 250,000.00 14,406,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 57,600.00 3,041,004.00 23,442,998.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 4,139,704.89 16,606,542.00 104,313,767.95 2,373,760,029.67 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952 353,000.00 913,000.00 8,700,923.00 49,574,961.04 523,901,836.30 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 1,062,474.60 37,652,257.60 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 6,298,741.00 53,492,299.31 124,305,264.35 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 0.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 100,000.00 20,000.00 477,074,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 1,581,719.00 2,251,500.00 40,770,969.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 1,710,000.00 71,556,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 9,000.00 103,700.00 45,616,929.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 902,186.00 39,610,077.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 250,000.00 27,777,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 57,600.00 3,142,009.00 23,544,003.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 353,000.00 137,008,677.94 4,139,704.89 16,897,983.00 112,259,129.95 2,183,116,627.15 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 - Retransmittal Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade Airport Ongoing $20,000.00 Department: Airport Prepared By: Lorin Rollins For questions, please include Lorin Rollins The Airport Executive Director is currently in the hiring process for the Director of Finance/CFO position at the Airport. A change in the position's pay grade from an A03 to an A02 would enhance the opportunity to hire potential applicants and is being requested at the suggestion of the Recruiting Firm performing the nationwide search to fill the position. A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF One-time $2,500,000.00 GF Ongoing $2,583,931.00 IMS One-time $103,700.00 Fleet One-time $748,500.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Glen Mills For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Glen Mills and Mary Beth Thompson SLC has contract funding for additional police staffing to help cover the area of the Inland Port. A total of $5,083,931 in funding will be received during this fiscal year, with an additional $2.5 million in funding to come in subsequent fiscal years. This funding will establish an additional 12.0 sworn and 1.0 civilian employee positions along with supplies, equipment, and vehicles. Due to the timing of receipt of this funding and hiring of the positions, this funding will be partially utilized in FY 2026 and will require a budget carryforward for the unspent balance in FY 2027 ongoing. The Police Department is requesting a straw poll to facilitate hiring in the May 2026 academy class. A-3: Workers Compensation Premium GF Ongoing $1,731,829.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Sharon Mangelson For questions, please include Sharon Mangelson, Mary Beth Thompson and Lauree Roberts In FY 2025, the City changed from self-insured for Workers Compensation to a premium based plan with the Workers Compensation Fund of Utah. This has increased the amount that will be billed to the General Fund through the Non - Departmental transfer. The FY 2026 increase in premiums was included in the Risk fund budget but was inadvertently excluded from the transfer from Non-Departmental to Risk. This amendment creates the additional budget needed to cover this increase. A-4: New Fund: Library Pass-Through GF Ongoing $33,195,704.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Adie Thakur Due to recent changes to state law, the Salt Lake City Library is no longer a taxing entity. As such, property tax revenue for the library now must pass through the General Fund before being sent to the Library. This amendment budgets the revenue and expenditure for this transfer of funds to the Library. This amendment is also to recommend the creation of a new fund for pass-through revenues and expenses. A-5: CRA Pass-Through True-Up GF Ongoing $4,536,141.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Adie Thakur Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 This amendment is a true-up of the amount of revenue that passes through the General Fund prior to being transferred to the Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA). Tax revenues for the CRA have come in higher than anticipated so the budget must now be adjusted to accommodate the higher amount. A-6: CRA Pass-Through to the Library GF One-time $2,311,032.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Miranda Johnson The Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) received $2,311,032 in tax increment from Salt Lake County that inadvertently included funds that should have been attributed to the Salt Lake City Library for CRA project area in which the Library does not participate. To rectify this error, the CRA will accept the cash and subsequently direct a payment to Salt Lake City as a pass through. From the City, the funds will then be sent to the Library. A-7: Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums Risk Ongoing $1,710,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Sharon Mangelson, Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Sharon Mangelson and Cindy Lou Trishman The City's workers compensation coverage changed in FY 2025 from self-insured (utilizing a third party administrator TPA) to a premium based insurance policy covered by Workers Compensation Fund of Utah (WCF). We are in the second year of the coverage. Our premiums are calculated in advance, based on projected payroll information (gross wages and other personal services data). During FY 2026, WCF performed an audit of our gross wages and we were billed a true-up amount of over $800,000, which was unbudgeted/unanticipated. The true-up amount for FY2025 was approximately $480,000 and we were able to cover it by the existing budget, but are unable to do so in FY 2026. In addition WCF is acting as the TPA for all w/c claims that were initiated prior to the start of the contract with WCF. These claims are not covered by the premiums, but are billed to the City by WCF. These claims were also inadvertently excluded from the FY26 budget and are projected to be about $655,000, which also cannot be covered by existing budget. There is an offsetting revenue in the Risk Fund as all w/c claims are billed to City departments, based the employees for whom the claims were paid. Any excess premiums above claims paid are allocated based on a prior year calculation. A-8: Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF One-time ($1,001,800.00) GF One-time $1,001,800.00 Fleet One-time $1,001,800.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and Shellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting to transfer budget from the Police Department to Fleet to address immediate needs for vehicle acquisition, as well as to replace vehicles with funding from one time efficiency savings in personnel and supplies. A critical priority for the department is the purchase of a dedicated transport van for the Public Order Unit. This vehicle is essential for effective on‑scene response and sustained operational presence during natural disasters, large‑scale events, long‑duration deployments, special events, and public demonstrations. These situations require r apid mobilization of personnel and equipment, and the current fleet does not provide adequate capacity to meet these operational demands. At present, the department must rent vans to support these operations. These rental vehicles are not properly sized or equipped for public safety use and lack required emergency equipment such as lights, sirens, communications systems, and safety modifications. This creates operational inefficiencies and limits the department’s ability to respond effectively, putting both our officers and the public at risk. Additionally, the department’s existing fleet is aging and experiencing increased maintenance needs, resulting in reduced reliability and higher operational costs. A significant portion of police vehicles are beyond their optimal service life, leading to gaps in availability and constraining the department’s ability to maintain consistent service levels. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 Transferring available department budget to the fleet fund provides a cost‑effective and timely solution that remains within existing financial constraints while supporting both operational readiness and long ‑term fleet sustainability. This acquisition will enhance the department’s ability to maintain public safety, support community events, and respond efficiently to emergencies and deploy officers safely. This request will provide an additional 10 patrol vehicles. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope CIP One-time $0.00 Department: CAN - Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stephens / Josh Willie For questions, please include Mark Stephens, Josh Willie, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This budget amendment rescopes funding from fiscal year 2026 of $1 Million and from fiscal year 2023 of $93,322 in Bridge Preservation funds. Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) is asking to broaden the scope from needed bridge repairs and routine maintenance to also include major bridge repairs and full rebuilds. Engineering is currently advancing the design of the 400 South bridge replacement over the Jordan River using a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) project delivery method. This is an alternative delivery method where the city contracts with a General Contractor during the design phase to coordinate with the Design Consultant on scheduling, pricing, an d constructability. The CM/GC method improves collaboration, reduces risk, and often accelerates project completion on large, complex projects. The additional funds will help cover increased costs associated with slightly widening the footprint of the new bridge to better accommodate maintaining one lane of traffic in each direction during reconstruction of the 400 South bridge, eliminating the need for off-site vehicular detours. The wider footprint will also allow pedestrian access to be maintained throughout construction. Any remaining funds after completion of the 400 South bridge project will likely be used to support other bridge maintenance needs across the City. As is necessary, Engineering will supplement the 400 South bridge project with Streets Reconstruction Funding from the following appropriations: FY 2025 CIP-3000-Street Reconstruction Program-Cap Maintenance, FY 2025 CIP-3033- Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3033-Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3000-FOF Streets- Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3000-Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3044-Street Reconstruction Program. D-2: Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvements CIP One-time ($4,489,610.79) Department: Finance Prepared By: Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Bret Montgomery and Mike Atkinson In FY 2026 BA#4 A-11, funding was approved for the old library, Plaza 349, and Justice Courts capital improvements in the amount of $5,498,741.00, which included $889,800 from the General Fund. This amendment did not take into account the $2,655,304.21 of CIP fund 3021 SRTB 2022B Non-taxable bond interest approved in FY25 BA#1 D-2 or the $1,834,306.58 of CIP Fund 3021 SRTB 2022B Non-taxable bond interest in FY26 BA#2 D7 that were both approved. This means that $9,988,351.79 has been approved in total . This amendment is to bring the approved budget total into alignment with the available bond interest by removing the $4,489,610.79 that was previously approved in prior Budget Amendments. Total approved for these projects so far: $5,498,741 Approved in FY26BA#4 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 -$9,988,351.79 from three BA's -$4,489,610.79 FY26 BA#5 Housekeeping total D-3: Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs GF One-time $902,186.00 Refuse One-time ($453,592.00) Refuse One-time $1,355,778.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Ammon Jacobsmeyer For questions, please include Ammon Jacobsmeyer and Debbie Lyons Sustainability is requesting that $453,592 be transferred from the Waste and Recycling Division Fund balance to the Environment and Energy Division Fund balance. In FY 2025, all IMS charges were incorrectly coded to the Environmental & Energy Division. This amendment will correct the allocation of the Waste and Recycling Division's share of the FY 2025 IMS charges. In addition to the adjustment pertaining to the IMS charges, t he amendment also includes a request for a General Fund transfer of $902,186 to allocate towards the Utah Renewable Communities (URC) startup cost agreement, should backstop funds be necessary to cover program start-up costs. Utah Renewable Communities is a coalition of cities, counties, and other municipalities that are working with RMP to source renewable energy for our communities to meet community goals. URC Start-up Costs are estimated to be $902,186. With regulatory approval of the program on March 4 by the Public Service Commission, Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) requires that an agency sign a contract to backstop RMP’s software and administrative start-up costs which are needed to send out notices and new bills for the program. Salt Lake City is the largest community participating in this program creation, working with RMP to provide new renewable energy resources that are equivalent to 100% of our community-wide electricity demand. Unless there is a major failure of the program, once revenue collection begins, these start-up costs fronted by RMP will be recouped from ratepayer revenues after which Salt Lake City’s obligation is expected to end. The Start-Up Cost Agreement and a related ordinance must be signed before June, and the funding from this amendment is needed to be able to sign the contract. The additional revenue and subsequent expenditure will leave a cash balance of $4.9 million, or 15% of operating expenditures in the Refuse fund. D-4: Park Land Acquisition Impact Fees One-time $405,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans The Public Lands Department in coordination with Real Estate Services is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $405,000 that will utilize Parks Impact Fees to fund the acquisition of 1.09 acres of open space. ***This item will require a closed session to discuss th is confidential land acquisition*** D-5: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant Funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South CIP One-time $101,005.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Amy Dorsey Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 Note that this item is related to item E-3 which transfers the funding to CIP. This amendment receives the funding transferred from the Misc. Grants Fund and creates the expenditure budget in CIP to complete the project(s) outlined in the grant funding agreement. In FY 2023 council approved a grant application (Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022) on the fiscal year’s consent agenda #8. When the grant was awarded, the revenue was recognized, but an expenditure budget to move the funds to CIP was never created. The grant was given for improvements to a railroad crossing on 700 South, so it would be most appropriate to load the budget in PRJ -230003 with the other 700 South project budgets. D-6: CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF One-time ($200,000.00) GF One-time $200,000.00 CIP One-time $200,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nicola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola, Mike Atkinson, Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson This amendment is for a one-time budgetary transfer of $200,000 from the Mayor’s Office to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) fund to support Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) initiatives. Combined with $300,000 in existing CIP allocations, this creates a total project budget of $500,000. These resources will be deployed for professional CPTED assessments and physical implementation. Primary focus areas include high-priority "hotspots" identified in the Public Safety Plan, with a specific emphasis on expanding streetlighting infrastructure and optimizing urban landscaping (e.g., strategic planter placement and vegetation manag ement) to eliminate concealment points and enhance natural surveillance. D-7: Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fee One-time $1,814,796.04 GF One-time $1,814,796.04 CIP One-time $443,705.06 Impact Fee One-time $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson / Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Mary Beth Thompson This is a request for Excess Capacity to be paid out of Streets Impact Fees to the General Fund in the amount of $1,814,796.04. The Administration is also requesting to subsequently transfer funds from the General fund to Streets Impact Fees in the amount of $989,253.26, Parks Impact Fees in the amount of $1,112,238.27, Fire Impact Fees in the amount of $137,307.43, and Police Impact Fees in the amount of $19,702.15 , for a total of $2,258,501.10. These transfers are to pay these Impact Fee funds interest earned on related fund balance amounts but mistakenly paid to the General Fund in error. The difference of $443,705.04 in transfers from General Fund CIP to Impact Fees not covered by the $1,814,796.04 will be covered by excess CIP funds. D-8: CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction CIP One-time $6,786,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson / Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Mary Beth Thompson The transfers listed below were all included in FY 2026 Non-Departmental Key Changes as revenue but failed to be included as expenditures on FY 2026 CIP Key Changes. This amendment corrects the oversight. 1. This budget item returns temporary General Fund support that was advanced for earthquake repairs. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 In Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Amendment #6, $2,000,000 was appropriated to begin repairs resulting from the 2020 earthquake until insurance reimbursement was received. In FY 2023 Budget Amendment #5, an additional $2,650,000 was appropriated to continue the repair work. 2. This budget item returns to the general fund the $800,000 unused portion of the one-time $10,000,000 General Fund transferred to CIP in fiscal year 2022. The other funds were used for $1,200,000 for GF Security, $6,000,000 deeply affordable housing, and $2,000,000 livable streets. 3. This budget item returns $1,366,000 in interest earned on CIP fund balances that was inadvertently paid to CIP instead of to the General Fund. D-9: General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds Debt Service One-time $1,062,474.60 CIP One-time $49,336,400.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Jou Ying Su / Marina Scott For questions, please include Jou Ying Su, Marina Scott, Mike Atkinson , Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson In November 2022, voters authorized the issuance of up to $85 million in general obligation bonds to fund Parks, Trails and Open Space projects. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026 is the second tranche from this authorization. It is scheduled to be sold on April 7, 2026. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay for renovation of the parks and open space projects associated with the bonds. There will be eleven project funds to which bond proceeds will be allocated. The Glendale Regional Park (1200 West 1700 South) project will receive $23,350,000. The Allen Park (1900 South) project will receive $3,650,000. The Public Open Space at Fleet Block project will receive $5,400,000. The Fairmont Park (1040 East Sugarmont Drive) project will receive $5,850,000. The Reimagine Neighborhood Parks, Trail, or Open Spaces (various locations) projects will receive $3,375,000. The Jordan River Corridor (various locations) project will receive $2,400,000. Contingencies/ Program Management will receive $4,000,000. The Art Allowance will receive $441,000. Salaries, benefits, and operational costs for 3 FTEs for FY27 and FY28 will receive $870,400. The bond's cost of issuance will be $393,600 and will be paid at closing that is currently scheduled on April 28, 2026. D-10: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Supplied CIP Budget CIP One-time $895,004.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lynn Jacobs / Julianne Sabula For questions, please include Lynn Jacobs, Julianne Sabula, Bret Montgomery and Mike Atkinson This amendment provides the budget for CIP to accomplish the necessary acquisitions and construction related to the Green Bike Expansion grant provided by UDOT. This grant is for $895,004 meant for the purpose of building more bike stations around the city. Through this grant, the city will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed and distributed by UDOT. D-11: Moving Mayor's Funding from Non- Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF One-time ($580,000.00) GF One-time $580,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Kathy Nunez For questions, please include Kathy Nunez, Mary Beth Thompson and Lindsey Nikola The purpose of this reallocation/amendment is to consolidate all budget and associated expenditures related to the National League of Cities event into a single cost center. Currently, expenses for this event are split between Cost Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 Centers. Centralizing both the budget and expenditures within the Mayor’s Executive Staff cost center (10101) will improve financial transparency and ensure more accurate reporting of total event costs. D-12: Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets CIP One-time ($2,000,000.00) Misc Grants One-time ($2,000,000.00) Misc Grants One-time $2,000,000.00 Storm Water One-time $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey In January of 2022 Salt Lake City was awarded a $2,000,000 grant from the State of Utah, Governor's Office of Planning and Budget office. This grant was part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) the state received from the US Treasury office. The funds from this grant were combined with City ARPA funds to construct new stormwater infrastructure for the benefit of increasing runoff storage and conveyance and reducing FEMA Floodplain Flood Hazard Zones. This funding was received in FY 2022 BA #7 as state grant revenue. At the time these funds were received, a revenue and expenditure budget was established in CIP, however the revenue was never transferred to CIP. Instead, the project was completed and expenses were paid by the stormwater fund. This housekeeping item is to move the money from the state grant fund to replenish the stormwater fund for these expenditures. The amendment will also remove the revenue and expenditure budget in the CIP fund that was established for the project but never used. D-13: Civic Center Public Real m and Recreation Improvements – Rescope of Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation CIP Funding CIP One-time $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson / Blake Thomas For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson, Mike Atkinson and Blake Thomas Salt Lake City’s Civic Center presents a unique opportunity to create an iconic, inclusive, and vibrant civic destination in the heart of downtown. This request of $3,000,000 represents seed funding toward implementation of public realm, park, and recreation improvements across the Civic Center campus and will serve as leverage for alternative funding sources, including grants and philanthropic partnerships. This amendment is intended to rescope and broaden the potential use of $3,000,000 in funding budgeted in CIP for the Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation. The Civic Center encompasses Washington Square, Library Square, and the connecting public realm along 200 East. Planned improvements will strengthen connections between these civic assets while expanding recreational opportunities, accessibility, gathering spaces, urban greening, and community programming capacity. Project improvements may include design and construction of park, recreation, and public realm features such as playgrounds, plazas, pathways, landscape and shade improvements, gathering areas, stormwater and sustainability elements, streetscape enhancements, accessibility upgrades, and associated infrastructure within the Civic Center campus. The intent of this application is to provide flexible implementation funding for catalytic recreation and public space investments within the Civic Center, particularly where there are timely opportunities to leverage grant funding, philanthropy, partnerships, and adjacent capital projects. In January 2026, the City released the Civic Center Vision Study, establishing a long-term framework for the future of Washington Square, Library Square, and the connecting public spaces between them. The Vision Study identifies opportunities to expand recreation, accessibility, urban greening, civic gathering space, and inclusive public amenities, helping guide future investment and implementation within the Civic Center campus. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $895,004.00 Department: CAN-Transportation Prepared By: Lynn Jacobs / Julianne Sabula For questions, please include Lynn Jacobs, Julianne Sabula and Tammy Hunsaker This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $895,004 for the purpose of building more bike stations around the city. Through this grant, the city will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed and distributed by UDOT. A corresponding amendment will also establish a budget in CIP. A public hearing was not held since the city didn’t apply for this grant. E-2: COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant Misc Grants One-time $500,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard, and Shellie Dietrich This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $500,000 for the purpose of enhancing de-escalation and crisis response training for the city’s law enforcement. The Salt Lake City Police department has received a COPS grant for the FY 2025 Safer Outcomes: Enhancing De- Escalation and Crisis Response Training for Law Enforcement-Support for Law Enforcement Agencies. The award total of $500,000 will be used for the following: • A virtual reality training simulator, as well as the initial setup and training ∼ $292,950 • Travel training costs for FEMA ICAT Train-the-trainer training and CIT International Conferences ∼ $50,730 • Local and department training in de-escalation and crisis response ∼ $111,825 • Overtime for staff providing and receiving training ∼ $44,495 A public hearing on the grant was held 9/2/2025 E-3: Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022 Misc Grants One-time $101,005.00 Department: CAN-Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stephens / Josh Willie For questions, please include Mark Stephens and Josh Willie In FY 2023 council approved a grant application (Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022) on the fiscal year’s consent agenda #8. This budget amendment is to move $101,005 to CIP. Note that this item is related to item D-5 which receives the funding in CIP and creates the expenditure budget. When the grant was awarded, the revenue was recognized, but an expenditure budget to move the funds to CIP was never created. The grant was given for improvements to a railroad crossing on 700 South, so it would be most appropriate to load the budget in PRJ -230003 with the other 700 South project budgets. The current grant worktag is GR-100895 (AWD-000189). Grant awarded in 2023, received as a grant, but never moved to CIP E-4: Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant Misc Grants One-time $26,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Katy Lopez Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Katy Lopez and Tammy Hunsaker This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $26,000 for the purpose of providing nutritious snacks to Youth City program participants. This is a renewal grant from the Utah State Board of Education Chile and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) grant program to provide snacks to Youth City participants. Public hearing is scheduled for 3/24/2026 E-5: Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant Misc Grants One-time $1,000,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tyler Murdock For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Tyler Murdock This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $1,000,000 for the purpose of providing design services for the Civic Center area of downtown Salt Lake City. This funding will be used for a design consultant to develop construction documents for public bidding. The design will consider and respond to the larger network of Civic Center District public spaces, transportation needs and the Downtown neighborhood. Public hearing was held 9/2/2025 E-6: International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services Misc Grants One-time $20,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard and Shellie Murdock This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $20,000 for International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services mini-grant. The funds would be used for supplies for outreach items, travel training costs for victim advocate team. Public hearing was held 1/13/2026 Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #2 G-1: Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting Project Misc Grants $600,000.00 Department: CRA Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Cara Lindsley The City Creek Daylighting project along the Folsom Trail is a critical step toward restoring one of Salt Lake City’s historic waterways and reimagining a major west side corridor as a vibrant, accessible public space. This project will uncover a buried section of City Creek between 800 West and 1000 West in the Fairpark neighborhood, where the creek currently runs through a concrete culvert beneath the former Folsom rail line. In its place, a visible, meandering stream will flow alongside the trail, surrounded by native landscaping, seating, lighting, and recreational amenities. These funds will support the completion of construction documents, advancing the project toward implementation. 40% designs to act as a starting point for a new phased approach, and $150,000 invested by the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Retransmittal Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 10 Agency, this is a well-planned, community-driven project that is ready to move forward. The work is rooted in years of community input and shaped by both technical and environmental considerations. Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees PAGE 1 FYTD 02/28/2026 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Police Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Police 8423003 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Police FY25B1D8-3035-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Police 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3035-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ A Police Impact Fee Refunds FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ 1,397$ 46,195$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3035-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Grand Total 200,641$ 8,408$ 2,937$ 187,521$ Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Parks Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ 1,119,185$ 880,815$ -$ Glendale Waterpark Master Plan & Rehab 8422406 2,246,982$ 57,919$ 2,189,063$ -$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 149,953$ -$ 149,953$ -$ 9 Line Park 8416005 1,733$ -$ 1,733$ -$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,928$ -$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ -$ 23,262$ -$ Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ 4,350,000$ -$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Green Loop 200 E Design 8422408 513,788$ -$ 513,788$ 0$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ -$ 2,596$ 42$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 125,740$ -$ 125,495$ 245$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ -$ -$ 1,705$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ Imperial Park Shade Accounting 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ Fisher House Exploration Center 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 262,043$ -$ 251,758$ 10,285$ C Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ 8,474$ 128,260$ 14,002$ IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Parks 8423005 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 299,269$ 20,685$ 244,524$ 34,060$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Parks FY25B1D8-3037-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Parks 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3037-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3037-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 10,666$ 74,252$ 93,380$ County #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pav 102,000$ -$ -$ 102,000$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Historic Renovation Allen Park 8422410 315,770$ 2,250$ 156,146$ 157,374$ 1200 East Median Reconstruction FY26B2A4-3037-1200 East Median Reconstruction 232,470$ -$ -$ 232,470$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball ExpansionFY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 43,020$ 276,119$ 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ Open Space Property Acquisition (Trails)8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ 35,350$ 314,650$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way FY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 37,639$ 16,577$ 377,644$ Jordan Park Event Grounds 8420134 404,139$ 845$ 15,108$ 388,186$ Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Res 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ Open Space Property Acquisition (City Parks)8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ Riverside Basketball Court Renovation FY26CIP-3037-Riverside Basketball Court Renovation 450,500$ -$ -$ 450,500$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 475,079$ 1,165$ 21,649$ 452,264$ Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms FY26CIP-3037-Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms 456,000$ -$ -$ 456,000$ Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup FY26CIP-3037-Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup 480,000$ -$ -$ 480,000$ Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 996,905$ -$ 513,452$ 483,453$ Jefferson Park Improvements FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ 28,284$ 13,691$ 488,025$ Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,457$ -$ 6,942$ 492,515$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 337 Park Development FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ 85$ 549,915$ Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ Fairmont Park Basketball Court FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 70,924$ 341,593$ 828,801$ Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Playground Shade FY26CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 523,932$ 1,480,804$ 1,048,202$ Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ Parks Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA StandardsFY26CIP-3037-Parks Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards 1,314,000$ -$ -$ 1,314,000$ Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements FY26CIP-3037-Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements 2,597,000$ -$ -$ 2,597,000$ Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation FY26CIP-3037-Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation 2,900,500$ -$ -$ 2,900,500$ Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 137,465$ 6,735,620$ 4,476,915$ Grand Total 50,655,396$ 2,031,146$ 18,852,164$ 29,772,086$ CONT PAGE 2 8,644,984$ 8484003 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,735,106$ PAGE 2 Impact Fees CONT FROM PG 1 FYTD 02/28/2026 Fire Allocation Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Fire Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center 8419202 3,079$ -$ 3,021$ 58$ Fire Station 1 Fencing FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Fire 8423004 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Fire FY25B1D8-3036-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Fire 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ B Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3036-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3036-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ Grand Total 286,402$ 10,182$ 4,561$ 271,659.49 Streets Allocation Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Street Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees 30,183$ 37,360$ -$ (7,177)$ 600/700 North Reconstruction FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ 3,204,371$ -$ -$ FY23 Road Projects BA1 A-5 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 2100 South Reconstruction FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ Crescent Apartments Impact Fee Refund FY25-Crescent Apartments Impact Fee Refund 8,641$ -$ 8,641$ -$ 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstruction 8412001 11,703$ -$ 11,703$ -$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 200S Transit Complete Start Suppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ 20,767$ 1,977$ -$ Transportation Safety Improvement IF 8422620 6,316$ -$ 6,316$ -$ 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ 1700S Corridor Transformation IF - Traffic Safety 8422622 35,300$ -$ 35,300$ -$ D 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ Gladiola Street 8406001 15,169$ 11,885$ 1,625$ 1,659$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419203)FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419203)29,817$ 9,289$ 7,739$ 12,788$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ 9,484$ 63,207$ 17,309$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 2025 IFFP Amendment - Streets FY25B5A12-3038-2025 IFFP Amendment - Streets 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,303$ 12,884$ 136,936$ 31,483$ Transportation Safety Improvements IF 8421500 241,135$ 67,904$ 139,210$ 34,021$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Streets FY25B1D8-3038-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Streets 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 340,236$ 250,390$ 54,638$ 35,207$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3038-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ 75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ 1,139$ 64,816$ 44,045$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 46,883$ -$ (1,117)$ 48,000$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3038-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and CitywFY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide 90,000$ 2,215$ 14,226$ 73,559$ FY24 Street IF Refunds FY24B5D9-3038-FY24 Street IF Refunds 75,000$ -$ -$ 75,000$ Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Tran FY26CIP-3038-Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit FY26 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Oper FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments-FY24 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps FY26 FY26CIP-3038-Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps FY26 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Cityw FY26CIP-3038-Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide FY26 230,000$ -$ -$ 230,000$ Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades FY26 FY26CIP-3038-Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades FY26 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ Grand Total 4,376,082$ 3,627,689$ (1,095,331)$ 1,843,724$ Sum of Budget-Amended Sum of Encum- brances Sum of YTD Expenditures Total 55,518,521$ 5,677,425$ 17,764,330$ 32,074,991$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 2,601,362$ 8484005 13,975,860.10$ $994,408 8484002 Impact Fees - Summary FYTD 02/28/2026 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center Notes: 8484001 1,735,106$ 8484002 994,408$ B 8484003 8,644,984$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 2,601,362$ D 13,975,860$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202607 (Jul2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202608 (Aug2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202609 (Sep2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202610 (Oct2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202611 (Nov2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202612 (Dec2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202701 (Jan2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202702 (Feb2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202703 (Mar2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202704 (Apr2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202705 (May2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202706 (Jun2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202707 (Jul2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202708 (Aug2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202709 (Sep2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202710 (Oct2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202711 (Nov2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202712 (Dec2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202801 (Jan2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202802 (Feb2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202803 (Mar2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202804 (Apr2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202805 (May2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202806 (Jun2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets TotalCalendar Month FY 2 0 2 6 FY 2 0 2 7 FY 2 0 2 8 FY 2 0 2 5 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 04/28/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/01/2026 From: Department * Finance Employee Name: Hillier, Randy E-mail Randy.Hillier@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 04/28/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 04/30/2026 Subject: FY25 Budget Amendment #5 Additional Staff Contact: Randy Hillier, Mary Beth Thompson Presenters/Staff Table Randy Hillier randy.hillier@slc.gov and Mary Beth Thompson: marybeth.thompson@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Recommendation: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2025 adopted budget Background/Discussion The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $49,547,961.04 in expenses in the general fund. The amendment proposes changes in eleven (11) funds, with a total revenue increase of $104,313,768 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $112,259,130. The proposal includes the addition of thirteen (13) general fund-funded positions. Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing NA Public Process Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. _____ of 2026 (Fifth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2025-2026) An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025, which adopted the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2025, and Ending June 30, 2026. In June of 2025, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, pursuant to the requirements of Utah Code section 10-6-118. The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and inspection by the public. All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing document as provided above, have been accomplished. Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 32 of 2025. SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2026, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128 of the Utah Code. SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ____ day of _____, 2026. Chris Wharton, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to the Mayor on Mayor’s Action: Approved Vetoed Mayor Erin Mendenhall ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ____ of 2026. Published Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Approved As To Form Jaysen Oldroyd Jaysen Oldroyd This page has intentionally been left blank Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs 1 Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade Airport 0.00 20,000.00 Ongoing - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF 2,583,931.00 2,583,931.00 Ongoing 13.00 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 One-time - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues IMS 103,700.00 103,700.00 One-time - 2 UIPA Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues Fleet 1,249,700.00 1,249,700.00 One-time - 3 Workers Compensation Premiums GF 0.00 1,731,171.00 Ongoing - 4 New Fund: Library Pass Through GF 33,195,704.00 33,195,704.00 Ongoing - 5 CRA Pass-Through True-up GF 4,536,141.00 4,536,141.00 Ongoing - 6 CRA Pass-Through to the Library GF 2,311,032.00 2,311,032.00 One-time - 7 Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums Risk 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 Ongoing - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF 0.00 (1,001,800.00)One-time - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF 0.00 1,001,800.00 One-time - 8 Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles Fleet 1,001,800.00 1,001,800.00 One-time - 1 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope CIP 0.00 0.00 One-time - 2 Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvements CIP (4,489,610.79)(4,489,610.79)One-time - 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs GF 0.00 902,186.00 One-time - 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs Refuse 0.00 (453,592.00)One-time 3 Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs Refuse 902,186.00 1,355,778.00 One-time - 4 Park Land Acquisition Impact Fees 0.00 405,000.00 One-time 5 UDOT Railroad Safety Grant funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South CIP 101,005.00 101,005.00 One-time 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF 0.00 (200,000.00)One-time - 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF 0.00 200,000.00 One-time - 6 CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements CIP 200,000.00 200,000.00 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fees 0.00 1,814,796.04 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer GF 1,814,796.04 1,814,796.04 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer CIP 0.00 443,705.06 One-time - 7 Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fees 2,258,501.10 0.00 One-time - 8 CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction CIP 0.00 6,786,000.00 One-time - 9 General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds Debt Service 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 One-time - 9 General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds CIP 49,336,400.00 49,336,400.00 One-time - 10 UDOT Green Bike Expansion Grant Supplied CIP Budget CIP 895,004.00 895,004.00 One-time - 11 Moving Mayor's Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 (580,000.00)One-time - 11 Moving Mayor's Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF 0.00 580,000.00 One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets CIP (2,000,000.00)(2,000,000.00)One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Misc Grants 0.00 (2,000,000.00)One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Misc Grants 0.00 2,000,000.00 One-time - 12 Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets Storm Water 2,000,000.00 0.00 One-time - Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed Section A: New Items Section D: Housekeeping Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources 1 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources 1 UDOT Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants 895,004.00 895,004.00 One-time - 2 COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant Misc Grants 500,000.00 500,000.00 One-time - 3 Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022 Misc Grants 0.00 101,005.00 One-time - 4 Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant Misc Grants 26,000.00 26,000.00 One-time - 5 Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant Misc Grants 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 One-time - 6 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services Misc Grants 20,000.00 20,000.00 One-time - Consent Agenda #2 1 Outdoor Recreation Initiative3 (ORI) City Creek Daylighting ProjectMisc Grants 600,000.00 600,000.00 One-time - Total of Budget Amendment Items 104,313,767.95 112,259,129.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure Amount Ongoing or One- time FTEs Total by Fund, Budget Amendment #5: General Fund GF 46,941,604.04 49,574,961.04 0.00 0.00 13.00 Airport Fund Airport 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 - Impact Fees Impact Fees 2,258,501.10 2,219,796.04 0.00 0.00 - IMS Fund IMS 103,700.00 103,700.00 0.00 0.00 - Fleet Fund Fleet 2,251,500.00 2,251,500.00 0.00 0.00 - CIP Fund CIP 44,042,798.21 51,272,503.27 0.00 0.00 - Debt Service Fund Debt Service 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 0.00 0.00 - Refuse Collection Fund Refuse 902,186.00 902,186.00 0.00 0.00 - Storm Water Fund Storm Water 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Misc Grants Fund Misc Grants 3,041,004.00 3,142,009.00 0.00 0.00 - Risk Fund Risk 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 0.00 0.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 104,313,767.95 112,259,129.95 0.00 0.00 13.00 Administration Proposed Council Approved Section I: Council Added Items Section F: Donations Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards 2 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only FY 2025-26 Budget, Including Budget Amendments FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Revenue General Fund (FC 100)453,721,525 0.00 - - 46,941,604.04 500,663,129.13 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)30,514,822 1,062,474.60 31,577,296.60 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)41,675,084 12,206,670.04 5,798,741.00 46,301,299.31 105,981,794.35 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)192,010,432 51,079,400.00 243,089,832.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)357,160,859 357,160,859.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)25,327,969 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 29,327,969.00 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)5,874,881 5,874,881.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)606,598,500 - 606,598,500.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,925,700 - 1,581,719.00 2,251,500.00 27,758,919.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 1,710,000.00 71,556,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,529,865 4,529,865.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 50,000.00 - 103,700.00 43,206,634.00 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)25,469,123 8,918,482.00 902,186.00 35,289,791.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)14,156,634 250,000.00 14,406,634.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 57,600.00 3,041,004.00 23,442,998.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)4,295,000 4,295,000.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)58,749,999 58,749,999.00 Transportation Fund (FC 785)14,332,500 14,332,500.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 Emergency Loan Program Fund - 273,000.00 Total of Budget Amendment Items 2,177,373,732 273,000.00 71,326,282.76 4,139,704.89 16,606,542.00 104,313,767.95 2,373,760,029.67 3 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Total Expense BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total Total Expense General Fund (FC 100)464,359,952 353,000.00 913,000.00 8,700,923.00 49,574,961.04 523,901,836.30 Debt Service Fund (FC 101)36,589,783 1,062,474.60 37,652,257.60 Other Improvement Fund (FC 150)3,000 3,000.00 Capital Improvement Fund (FC 300)48,175,084 16,339,140.04 6,298,741.00 53,492,299.31 124,305,264.35 Water Utility Fund (FC 400)216,611,815 66,849,851.00 283,461,666.00 Sewer Utility Fund (FC 410)159,022,034 12,083,142.00 171,105,176.00 Stormwater Utility Fund (FC 420)26,465,800 7,349,551.00 0.00 33,815,351.30 Street Lighting Utility Fund (FC 430)8,418,357 1,327,234.00 9,745,591.00 Department of Airports Fund (FC 540)476,954,577 100,000.00 20,000.00 477,074,577.00 Fleet Management Fund (FC 610)23,735,252 13,202,498.00 1,581,719.00 2,251,500.00 40,770,969.00 Risk Management Fund (FC 620)69,846,524 1,710,000.00 71,556,524.37 Governmental Immunity Fund (FC 630)4,302,013 94,791.00 4,396,804.00 Information Mgt Serv Fund (FC 650)43,052,934 2,451,295.18 9,000.00 103,700.00 45,616,929.18 Local Building Authority Fund (FC 660)1,172,525 1,172,525.00 Refuse Collection Fund (FC670)29,357,332 9,350,559.00 902,186.00 39,610,077.00 Golf Fund (FC 680)26,570,200 957,404.00 250,000.00 27,777,604.00 Housing and Loan Fund (FC 690)14,082,500 14,082,500.00 CDBG Fund (FC 710)4,885,779 4,885,779.00 Miscellaneous Grants Fund (FC 720)12,714,477 3,490,212.72 4,139,704.89 57,600.00 3,142,009.00 23,544,003.61 Demolition Weed and Forfeiture (FC 730)4,365,000 4,365,000.00 Emergency 911 Dispatch (FC 750)9,646,688 9,646,688.00 Downtown Alliance Fund (FC 760)1,700,000 2,500,000.00 4,200,000.00 Donations Fund (FC 770)500,000 500,000.00 Funding Our Future Fund (FC 780)48,111,572 48,111,571.83 Transportation Fund (FC 785)15,106,833 15,106,833.00 DEA Taskforce (FC 901)1,159,208 1,159,207.61 Community Reinvestment Agency Fund (FC 920)86,036,232 86,036,232.00 Sports Arena Fund (FC 740)79,512,660 79,512,660.00 - Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,912,458,131 353,000.00 137,008,677.94 4,139,704.89 16,897,983.00 112,259,129.95 2,183,116,627.15 4 Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Finance Department City Council Office Contingent Appropriation / Notes 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Impact Fees PAGE 1 FYTD 02/28/2026 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC Police Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Police Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Police 8423003 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Police FY25B1D8-3035-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Police 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3035-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ A Police Impact Fee Refunds FY24B5A6-3035-Police Impact Fee Refunds 47,592$ -$ 1,397$ 46,195$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3035-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Grand Total 200,641$ 8,408$ 2,937$ 187,521$ Parks Allocation Budget Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Parks Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground FY25B1D15-3037-Liberty Park All Abilities Play Park & Playground 2,000,000$ 1,119,185$ 880,815$ -$ Glendale Waterpark Master Plan & Rehab 8422406 2,246,982$ 57,919$ 2,189,063$ -$ 9Line Orchard 8420136 149,953$ -$ 149,953$ -$ 9 Line Park 8416005 1,733$ -$ 1,733$ -$ Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 60,928$ -$ 60,928$ -$ Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 23,262$ -$ 23,262$ -$ Glendale Regional Park Phase 1 8423450 4,350,000$ -$ 4,350,000$ -$ Rose Park Neighborhood Center 8423403 157,280$ -$ 157,280$ -$ Green Loop 200 E Design 8422408 513,788$ -$ 513,788$ 0$ Park's Consultant's Contract 8419204 2,638$ -$ 2,596$ 42$ FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 125,740$ -$ 125,495$ 245$ Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 1,056$ -$ -$ 1,056$ Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 1,570$ -$ -$ 1,570$ Waterpark Redevelopment Plan 8421402 1,705$ -$ -$ 1,705$ Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$ Imperial Park Shade Accounting 8419103 6,398$ -$ -$ 6,398$ Fisher House Exploration Center 8421401 132,208$ 1,400$ 123,813$ 6,996$ Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 9,350$ -$ -$ 9,350$ Bridge to Backman 8418005 262,043$ -$ 251,758$ 10,285$ C Rich Park Comm Garden 8420138 12,431$ -$ -$ 12,431$ Three Creeks West Bank New Park 8422403 150,736$ 8,474$ 128,260$ 14,002$ IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Parks 8423005 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Trailhead Prop Acquisition 8421403 21,830$ -$ -$ 21,830$ Lighting NE Baseball Field 8423409 299,269$ 20,685$ 244,524$ 34,060$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Parks FY25B1D8-3037-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Parks 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3037-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3037-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 54,808$ -$ -$ 54,808$ Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)FY25CIP-3037-Equal Grounds Project (Calisthenics-Fitness Area)86,200$ -$ -$ 86,200$ RAC Playground with Shade Sails 8422415 178,298$ 10,666$ 74,252$ 93,380$ County #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 240,239$ -$ 143,325$ 96,914$ Sugar House Park - 50/50 Cost Share for One Pav 102,000$ -$ -$ 102,000$ UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 120,893$ -$ -$ 120,893$ Historic Renovation Allen Park 8422410 315,770$ 2,250$ 156,146$ 157,374$ 1200 East Median Reconstruction FY26B2A4-3037-1200 East Median Reconstruction 232,470$ -$ -$ 232,470$ Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball ExpansionFY24CIP-3037-Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 253,500$ -$ 8,182$ 245,319$ SLC Foothills Land Acquisition 8422413 319,139$ -$ 43,020$ 276,119$ 900 S River Park Soccer Field 8423406 287,848$ 130$ 8,420$ 279,298$ Open Space Property Acquisition (Trails)8423453 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match FY25CIP-3037-Street Futsal Courts 1:1 Match 350,000$ -$ 35,350$ 314,650$ Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ -$ -$ 327,678$ Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way FY25CIP-3037-Pocket Park Community Space - Jake Garn Way 330,000$ -$ -$ 330,000$ Parks Bilingual Signage Installation FY24CIP-3037-Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 331,200$ -$ -$ 331,200$ Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 431,860$ 37,639$ 16,577$ 377,644$ Jordan Park Event Grounds 8420134 404,139$ 845$ 15,108$ 388,186$ Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Res 416,150$ -$ -$ 416,150$ Open Space Property Acquisition (City Parks)8423452 450,000$ -$ 33,140$ 416,860$ Riverside Basketball Court Renovation FY26CIP-3037-Riverside Basketball Court Renovation 450,500$ -$ -$ 450,500$ Jordan Park Pedestrian Pathway 8422414 475,079$ 1,165$ 21,649$ 452,264$ Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms FY26CIP-3037-Safe, Open and Clean Park Restrooms 456,000$ -$ -$ 456,000$ Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup FY26CIP-3037-Concord St to Alzheimer's Jordan River Cleanup 480,000$ -$ -$ 480,000$ Marmalade Plaza Project 8423451 996,905$ -$ 513,452$ 483,453$ Jefferson Park Improvements FY24CIP-3037-Jefferson Park Improvements 530,000$ 28,284$ 13,691$ 488,025$ Gateway Triangle Property Park 8423408 499,457$ -$ 6,942$ 492,515$ RAC Playground Phase II 8423405 521,564$ -$ -$ 521,564$ Riverside Park Pathway Loop FY25CIP-3037-Riverside Park Pathway Loop 530,000$ -$ -$ 530,000$ 337 Park Development FY24CIP-3037-337 Park Development 550,000$ -$ 85$ 549,915$ Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet FY24CIP-3037-Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 648,000$ -$ -$ 648,000$ Fairmont Park Basketball Court FY25CIP-3037-Fairmont Park Basketball Court 678,600$ -$ -$ 678,600$ SLC Foothills Trailhead Development 8422412 1,241,318$ 70,924$ 341,593$ 828,801$ Mem. Tree Grove Design & Infra 8423407 864,449$ -$ -$ 864,449$ Playground Shade FY25CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Playground Shade FY26CIP-3037-Playground Shade 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ Warm Springs & North Gateway Park FY25B1D15-3037-Warm Springs & North Gateway Park 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Folsom Trail Landscaping, Irrigation & Completing 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ Pioneer Park 8419150 3,052,938$ 523,932$ 1,480,804$ 1,048,202$ Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization FY25CIP-3037-Amplifying Our Jordan River Revitalization 1,300,000$ -$ -$ 1,300,000$ Parks Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA StandardsFY26CIP-3037-Parks Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards 1,314,000$ -$ -$ 1,314,000$ Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements FY26CIP-3037-Event Infrastructure and Pavilion Replacements 2,597,000$ -$ -$ 2,597,000$ Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation FY26CIP-3037-Civic Campus and Green Loop Implementation 2,900,500$ -$ -$ 2,900,500$ Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction FY25B1D15-3037-Glendale Park Phase 2 Design & Construction 11,350,000$ 137,465$ 6,735,620$ 4,476,915$ Grand Total 50,655,396$ 2,031,146$ 18,852,164$ 29,772,086$ CONT PAGE 2 8,644,984$ 8484003 UnAllocated Budget Amount 1,735,106$ PAGE 2 Impact Fees CONT FROM PG 1 FYTD 02/28/2026 Fire Allocation Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Fire Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center 8419202 3,079$ -$ 3,021$ 58$ Fire Station 1 Fencing FY24B4A6-3036-Fire Station 1 Fencing 130,275$ -$ -$ 130,275$ IFFP Consultant Contract Amendment - Fire 8423004 29,000$ 10,182$ 1,540$ 17,278$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Fire FY25B1D8-3036-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Fire 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ B Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3036-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3036-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ Grand Total 286,402$ 10,182$ 4,561$ 271,659.49 Streets Allocation Allocation Encumbrances FY24-FYTD26 Expenditures Remaining Street Impact Fee Activity? Y Values Description Cost Center Sum of Street Allocation Budget Amended Sum of Street Allocation Encumbrances Sum of Street Allocation YTD Expenditures Sum of Street Allocation Remaining Appropriation FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP - Unappropriated Transportation Impact Fees 30,183$ 37,360$ -$ (7,177)$ 600/700 North Reconstruction FY24B3A6-3038-600/700 North Reconstruction 3,204,371$ 3,204,371$ -$ -$ FY23 Road Projects BA1 A-5 8423625 (224,557)$ -$ (224,557)$ -$ 2100 South Reconstruction FY24B3A5-3038-2100 South Reconstruction (131,247)$ -$ (131,247)$ -$ 200 S Recon Trans Corridor IF 8423602 252,000$ -$ 252,000$ -$ Crescent Apartments Impact Fee Refund FY25-Crescent Apartments Impact Fee Refund 8,641$ -$ 8,641$ -$ 300 N Complete Street Recons I 8423606 40,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 (1,359,910)$ -$ (1,359,910)$ -$ 500/700 S Street Reconstruction 8412001 11,703$ -$ 11,703$ -$ Corridor Transformations IF 8422608 25,398$ -$ 25,398$ -$ 200S Transit Complete Start Suppl IF 8422602 37,422$ -$ 37,422$ -$ 500 to 700 S 8418016 22,744$ 20,767$ 1,977$ -$ Transportation Safety Improvement IF 8422620 6,316$ -$ 6,316$ -$ 700 South Phase 7 IF 8423305 (166)$ -$ (166)$ -$ 1700S Corridor Transformation IF - Traffic Safety 8422622 35,300$ -$ 35,300$ -$ D 900 South 9Line RR Cross IF 8422604 28,000$ -$ 28,000$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 (108,000)$ -$ (108,000)$ -$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 (200,000)$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ Gladiola Street 8406001 15,169$ 11,885$ 1,625$ 1,659$ Urban Trails FY22 IF 8422619 6,500$ -$ -$ 6,500$ Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419203)FY24B5A7-3038-Update of the Streets IFFP (Rescope 8419203)29,817$ 9,289$ 7,739$ 12,788$ 400 South Viaduct Trail IF 8422611 90,000$ 9,484$ 63,207$ 17,309$ Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 18,699$ -$ -$ 18,699$ 2025 IFFP Amendment - Streets FY25B5A12-3038-2025 IFFP Amendment - Streets 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$ Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 181,303$ 12,884$ 136,936$ 31,483$ Transportation Safety Improvements IF 8421500 241,135$ 67,904$ 139,210$ 34,021$ Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Streets FY25B1D8-3038-Finance & Accounting O/H Charges - Streets 35,065$ -$ -$ 35,065$ Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 340,236$ 250,390$ 54,638$ 35,207$ Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance FY26Key Changes-3038-Impact Fee Tracking Reporting & Compliance 38,984$ -$ -$ 38,984$ 75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement FY24CIP-3038-75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 40,000$ -$ -$ 40,000$ Transit Cap-Freq Trans Routes 8423608 110,000$ 1,139$ 64,816$ 44,045$ Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 46,883$ -$ (1,117)$ 48,000$ Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting FY26Key Changes-3038-Impact Fee One-Time Historical Reporting 50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)FY25CIP-3037-5th West Commons Conversation Center(s)50,000$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and CitywFY24CIP-3038-Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide 90,000$ 2,215$ 14,226$ 73,559$ FY24 Street IF Refunds FY24B5D9-3038-FY24 Street IF Refunds 75,000$ -$ -$ 75,000$ Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Tran FY26CIP-3038-Transit Capital Program / Funding Our Future Transit FY26 100,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Neighborhood Byways IF 8422614 104,500$ -$ -$ 104,500$ Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Oper FY24CIP-3038-Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments-FY24 110,000$ -$ 513$ 109,488$ Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$ Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps FY26 FY26CIP-3038-Missing Sidewalks & Bikeway Network Gaps FY26 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Cityw FY26CIP-3038-Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide FY26 230,000$ -$ -$ 230,000$ Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades FY26 FY26CIP-3038-Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades FY26 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ Grand Total 4,376,082$ 3,627,689$ (1,095,331)$ 1,843,724$ Sum of Budget-Amended Sum of Encum- brances Sum of YTD Expenditures Total 55,518,521$ 5,677,425$ 17,764,330$ 32,074,991$ E = A + B + C + D TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE 2,601,362$ 8484005 13,975,860.10$ $994,408 8484002 Impact Fees - Summary FYTD 02/28/2026 Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area Area Cost Center Notes: 8484001 1,735,106$ 8484002 994,408$ B 8484003 8,644,984$ C Impact fee - Streets 8484005 2,601,362$ D 13,975,860$ Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month 202407 (Jul2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202408 (Aug2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202409 (Sep2024)2025Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202410 (Oct2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202411 (Nov2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202412 (Dec2024)2025Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202501 (Jan2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202502 (Feb2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202503 (Mar2025)2025Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202504 (Apr2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202505 (May2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202506 (Jun2025)2025Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202507 (Jul2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202508 (Aug2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202509 (Sep2025)2026Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202510 (Oct2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202511 (Nov2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202512 (Dec2025)2026Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202601 (Jan2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202602 (Feb2026)2026Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Current Month 202603 (Mar2026)2026Q3 202604 (Apr2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202605 (May2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202606 (Jun2026)2026Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202607 (Jul2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202608 (Aug2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202609 (Sep2026)2027Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202610 (Oct2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202611 (Nov2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202612 (Dec2026)2027Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202701 (Jan2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202702 (Feb2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202703 (Mar2027)2027Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202704 (Apr2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202705 (May2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202706 (Jun2027)2027Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202707 (Jul2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202708 (Aug2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202709 (Sep2027)2028Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202710 (Oct2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202711 (Nov2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202712 (Dec2027)2028Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202801 (Jan2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202802 (Feb2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202803 (Mar2028)2028Q3 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202804 (Apr2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202805 (May2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 202806 (Jun2028)2028Q4 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Fiscal Quarter E = A + B + C + D Police Fire Parks Streets TotalCalendar Month FY 2 0 2 6 FY 2 0 2 7 FY 2 0 2 8 FY 2 0 2 5 This page has intentionally been left blank Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 1 Section A: New Items A-1: Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade Airport Ongoing $20,000.00 Department: Airport Prepared By: Lorin Rollins For questions, please include Lorin Rollins The Airport Executive Director is currently in the hiring process for the Director of Finance/CFO position at the Airport. A change in the position's pay grade from an A03 to an A02 would enhance the opportunity to hire potential applicants and is being requested at the suggestion of the Recruiting Firm performing the nationwide search to fill the position. A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues GF One-time $2,500,000.00 GF Ongoing $2,500,000.00 IMS One-time $103,700.00 Fleet One-time $748,500.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich / Glen Mills For questions, please include Shellie Dietrich, Glen Mills and Mary Beth Thompson SLC has contract funding for additional police staffing to help cover the area of the Inland Port. A total of $5,000,000 in funding will be received during this fiscal year, with an additional $2.5 million in funding to come in subsequent fiscal years. This funding will establish an additional 12.0 sworn and 1.0 civilian employee positions along with supplies, equipment, and vehicles. Due to the timing of receipt of this funding and hiring of the positions, this funding will be partially utilized in FY 2026 and will require a budget carryforward for the unspent balance in FY 2027 ongoing. The Police Department is requesting a straw poll to facilitate hiring in the May 2026 academy class. A-3: Workers Compensation Premium GF Ongoing $1,731,829.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Sharon Mangelson For questions, please include Sharon Mangelson, Mary Beth Thompson and Lauree Roberts In FY 2025, the City changed from self-insured for Workers Compensation to a premium based plan with the Workers Compensation Fund of Utah. This has increased the amount that will be billed to the General Fund through the Non - Departmental transfer. The FY 2026 increase in premiums was included in the Risk fund budget but was inadvertently excluded from the transfer from Non-Departmental to Risk. This amendment creates the additional budget needed to cover this increase. A-4: New Fund: Library Pass-Through GF Ongoing $33,195,704.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Adie Thakur Due to recent changes to state law, the Salt Lake City Library is no longer a taxing entity. As such, property tax revenue for the library now must pass through the General Fund before being sent to the Library. This amendment budgets the revenue and expenditure for this transfer of funds to the Library. This amendment is also to recommend the creation of a new fund for pass-through revenues and expenses. A-5: CRA Pass-Through True-Up GF Ongoing $4,536,141.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Adie Thakur Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 2 This amendment is a true-up of the amount of revenue that passes through the General Fund prior to being transferred to the Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA). Tax revenues for the CRA have come in higher than anticipated so the budget must now be adjusted to accommodate the higher amount. A-6: CRA Pass-Through to the Library GF One-time $2,311,032.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mary Beth Thompson For questions, please include Mary Beth Thompson and Miranda Johnson The Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) received $2,311,032 in tax increment from Salt Lake County that inadvertently included funds that should have been attributed to the Salt Lake City Library for CRA project area in which the Library does not participate. To rectify this error, the CRA will accept the cash and subsequently direct a payment to Salt Lake City as a pass through. From the City, the funds will then be sent to the Library. A-7: Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums Risk Ongoing $1,710,000.00 Department: Attorney’s Office Prepared By: Sharon Mangelson, Cindy Lou Trishman For questions, please include Sharon Mangelson and Cindy Lou Trishman The City's workers compensation coverage changed in FY 2025 from self-insured (utilizing a third party administrator TPA) to a premium based insurance policy covered by Workers Compensation Fund of Utah (WCF). We are in the second year of the coverage. Our premiums are calculated in advance, based on projected payroll information (gross wages and other personal services data). During FY 2026, WCF performed an audit of our gross wages and we were billed a true-up amount of over $800,000, which was unbudgeted/unanticipated. The true-up amount for FY2025 was approximately $480,000 and we were able to cover it by the existing budget, but are unable to do so in FY 2026. In addition WCF is acting as the TPA for all w/c claims that were initiated prior to the start of the contract with WCF. These claims are not covered by the premiums, but are billed to the City by WCF. These claims were also inadvertently excluded from the FY26 budget and are projected to be about $655,000, which also cannot be covered by existing budget. There is an offsetting revenue in the Risk Fund as all w/c claims are billed to City departments, based the employees for whom the claims were paid. Any excess premiums above claims paid are allocated based on a prior year calculation. A-8: Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles GF One-time ($1,001,800.00) GF One-time $1,001,800.00 Fleet One-time $1,001,800.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich For questions, please include Chief Redd and S hellie Dietrich The Police Department is requesting to transfer budget from the Police Department to Fleet to address immediate needs for vehicle acquisition, as well as to replace vehicles with funding from one time efficiency savings in personnel and supplies. A critical priority for the department is the purchase of a dedicated transport van for the Public Order Unit. This vehicle is essential for effective on‑scene response and sustained operational presence during natural disasters, large‑scale events, long‑duration deployments, special events, and public demonstrations. These situations require rapid mobilization of personnel and equipment, and the current fleet does not provide adequate capacity to meet these operational demands. At present, the department must rent vans to support these operations. These rental vehicles are not properly sized or equipped for public safety use and lack required emergency equipment such as lights, sirens, communications systems, and safety modifications. This creates operational inefficiencies and limits the department’s ability to respond effectively, putting both our officers and the public at risk. Additionally, the department’s existing fleet is aging and experiencing increased maintenance needs, resulting in reduced reliability and higher operational costs. A significant portion of police vehicles are beyond their optimal service life, leading to gaps in availability and constraining the department’s ability to maintain consistent service levels. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 3 Transferring available department budget to the fleet fund provides a cost‑effective and timely solution that remains within existing financial constraints while supporting both operational readiness and long ‑term fleet sustainability. This acquisition will enhance the department’s ability to maintain public safety, support community events, and respond efficiently to emergencies and deploy officers safely. This request will provide an additional 10 patrol vehicles. Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section D: Housekeeping D-1: 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope CIP One-time $0.00 Department: CAN - Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stephens / Josh Willie For questions, please include Mark Stephens, Josh Willie, Tammy Hunsaker and Brent Beck This budget amendment rescopes funding from fiscal year 2026 of $1 Million and from fiscal year 2023 of $93,322 in Bridge Preservation funds. Community and Neighborhoods (CAN) is asking to broaden the scope from needed bridge repairs and routine maintenance to also include major bridge repairs and full rebuilds. Engineering is currently advancing the design of the 400 South bridge replacement over the Jordan River using a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) project delivery method. This is an alternative delivery method where the city contracts with a General Contractor during the design phase to coordinate with the Design Consultant on scheduling, pricing, an d constructability. The CM/GC method improves collaboration, reduces risk, and often accelerates project completion on large, complex projects. The additional funds will help cover increased costs associated with slightly widening the footprint of the new bridge to better accommodate maintaining one lane of traffic in each direction during reconstruction of the 400 South bridge, eliminating the ne ed for off-site vehicular detours. The wider footprint will also allow pedestrian access to be maintained throughout construction. Any remaining funds after completion of the 400 South bridge project will likely be used to support other bridge maintenanc e needs across the City. As is necessary, Engineering will supplement the 400 South bridge project with Streets Reconstruction Funding from the following appropriations: FY 2025 CIP-3000-Street Reconstruction Program-Cap Maintenance, FY 2025 CIP-3033- Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3033-Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3000-FOF Streets- Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3000-Street Reconstruction Program, FY 2026 CIP-3044-Street Reconstruction Program. D-2: Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvements CIP One-time ($4,489,610.79) Department: Finance Prepared By: Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Bret Montgomery and Mike Atkinson In FY 2026 BA#4 A-11, funding was approved for the old library, Plaza 349, and Justice Courts capital improvements in the amount of $5,498,741.00, which included $889,800 from the General Fund. This amendment did not take into account the $2,655,304.21 of CIP fund 3021 SRTB 2022B Non-taxable bond interest approved in FY25 BA#1 D-2 or the $1,834,306.58 of CIP Fund 3021 SRTB 2022B Non-taxable bond interest in FY26 BA#2 D7 that were both approved. This means that $9,988,351.79 has been approved in total . This amendment is to bring the approved budget total into alignment with the available bond interest by removing the $4,489,610.79 that was previously approved in prior Budget Amendments. Total approved for these projects so far: $5,498,741 Approved in FY26BA#4 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 4 -$9,988,351.79 from three BA's -$4,489,610.79 FY26 BA#5 Housekeeping total D-3: Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Start Up Costs GF One-time $902,186.00 Refuse One-time ($453,592.00) Refuse One-time $1,355,778.00 Department: Sustainability Prepared By: Ammon Jacobsmeyer For questions, please include Ammon Jacobsmeyer and Debbie Lyons Sustainability is requesting that $453,592 be transferred from the Waste and Recycling Division Fund balance to the Environment and Energy Division Fund balance. In FY 2025, all IMS charges were incorrectly coded to the Environmental & Energy Division. This amendment will correct the allocation of the Waste and Recycling Division's share of the FY 2025 IMS charges. In addition to the adjustment pertaining to the IMS charges, t he amendment also includes a request for a General Fund transfer of $902,186 to allocate towards the Utah Renewable Communities (URC) startup cost agreement, should backstop funds be necessary to cover program start-up costs. Utah Renewable Communities is a coalition of cities, counties, and other municipalities that are working with RMP to source renewable energy for our communities to meet community goals. URC Start-up Costs are estimated to be $902,186. With regulatory approval of the program on March 4 by the Public Service Commission, Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) requires that an agency sign a contract to backstop RMP’s software and administrative start-up costs which are needed to send out notices and new bills for the program . Salt Lake City is the largest community participating in this program creation, working with RMP to provide new renewable energy resources that are equivalent to 100% of our community-wide electricity demand. Unless there is a major failure of the program, once revenue collection begins, these start-up costs fronted by RMP will be recouped from ratepayer revenues after which Salt Lake City’s obligation is expected to end. The Start-Up Cost Agreement and a related ordinance must be signed before June, and the funding from this amendment is needed to be able to sign the contract. The additional revenue and subsequent expenditure will leave a cash balance of $4.9 million, or 15% of operating expenditures in the Refuse fund. D-4: Park Land Acquisition Impact Fees One-time $405,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Gregg Evans For questions, please include Gregg Evans The Public Lands Department in coordination with Real Estate Services is requesting a budget amendment in the amount of $405,000 that will utilize Parks Impact Fees to fund the acquisition of 1.09 acres of open space. ***This item will require a closed session to discuss th is confidential land acquisition*** D-5: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant Funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South CIP One-time $101,005.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Amy Dorsey Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 5 Note that this item is related to item E-3 which transfers the funding to CIP. This amendment receives the funding transferred from the Misc. Grants Fund and creates the expenditure budget in CIP to complete the project(s) outlined in the grant funding agreement. In FY 2023 council approved a grant application (Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022) on the fiscal year’s consent agenda #8. When the grant was awarded, the revenue was recognized, but an expenditure budget to move the funds to CIP was never created. The grant was given for improvements to a railroad crossing on 700 South, so it would be most appropriate to load the budget in PRJ -230003 with the other 700 South project budgets. D-6: CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements GF One-time ($200,000.00) GF One-time $200,000.00 CIP One-time $200,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Lindsey Nicola For questions, please include Lindsey Nikola, Mike Atkinson, Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson This amendment is for a one-time budgetary transfer of $200,000 from the Mayor’s Office to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) fund to support Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) initiatives. Combined with $300,000 in existing CIP allocations, this creates a total project budget of $500,000. These resources will be deployed for professional CPTED assessments and physical implementation. Primary focus areas include high-priority "hotspots" identified in the Public Safety Plan, with a specific emphasis on expanding streetlighting infrastructure and optimizing urban landscaping (e.g., strategic planter placement and vegetation management) to eliminate concealment points and enhance natural surveillance. D-7: Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income Transfer Impact Fee One-time $1,814,796.04 GF One-time $1,814,796.04 CIP One-time $443,705.06 Impact Fee One-time $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson / Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Mary Beth Thompson This is a request for Excess Capacity to be paid out of Streets Impact Fees to the General Fund in the amount of $1,814,796.04. The Administration is also requesting to subsequently transfer funds from the General fund to Streets Impact Fees in the amount of $989,253.26, Parks Impact Fees in the amount of $1,112,238.27, Fire Impact Fees in the amount of $137,307.43, and Police Impact Fees in the amount of $19,702.15 , for a total of $2,258,501.10. These transfers are to pay these Impact Fee funds interest earned on related fund balance amounts but mistakenly paid to the General Fund in error. The difference of $443,705.04 in transfers from General Fund CIP to Impact Fees not covered by the $1,814,796.04 will be covered by excess CIP funds. D-8: CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction CIP One-time $6,786,000.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Mike Atkinson / Bret Montgomery For questions, please include Mike Atkinson, Bret Montgomery and Mary Beth Thompson The transfers listed below were all included in FY 2026 Non-Departmental Key Changes as revenue but failed to be included as expenditures on FY 2026 CIP Key Changes. This amendment corrects the oversight. 1. This budget item returns temporary General Fund support that was advanced for earthquake repairs. Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 6 In Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Amendment #6, $2,000,000 was appropriated to begin repairs resulting from the 2020 earthquake until insurance reimbursement was received. In FY 2023 Budget Amendment #5, an additional $2,650,000 was appropriated to continue the repair work. 2. This budget item returns to the general fund the $800,000 unused portion of the one-time $10,000,000 General Fund transferred to CIP in fiscal year 2022. The other funds were used for $1,200,000 for GF Security, $6,000,000 deeply affordable housing, and $2,000,000 livable streets. 3. This budget item returns $1,366,000 in interest earned on CIP fund balances that was inadvertently paid to CIP instead of to the General Fund. D-9: General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds Debt Service One-time $1,062,474.60 CIP One-time $49,336,400.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Jou Ying Su / Marina Scott For questions, please include Jou Ying Su, Marina Scott, Mike Atkinson , Ben Luedtke and Mary Beth Thompson In November 2022, voters authorized the issuance of up to $85 million in general obligation bonds to fund Parks, Trails and Open Space projects. The General Obligation Bonds, Series 2026 is the second tranche from this authorization. It is scheduled to be sold on April 7, 2026. This amendment creates the revenue budget for the bond proceeds and the expenditure budget to pay for renovation of the parks and open space projects associated with the bonds. There will be eleven project funds to which bond proceeds will be allocated. The Glendale Regional Park (1200 West 1700 South) project will receive $23,350,000. The Allen Park (1900 South) project will receive $3,650,000. The Public Open Space at Fleet Block project will receive $5,400,000. The Fairmont Park (1040 East Sugarmont Drive) project will receive $5,850,000. The Reimagine Neighborhood Parks, Trail, or Open Spaces (various locations) projects will receive $3,375,000. The Jordan River Corridor (various locations) project will receive $2,400,000. Contingencies/ Program Management will receive $4,000,000. The Art Allowance will receive $441,000. Salaries, benefits, and operational costs for 3 FTEs for FY27 and FY28 will receive $870,400. The bond's cost of issuance will be $393,600 and will be paid at closing that is currently scheduled on April 28, 2026. D-10: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Supplied CIP Budget CIP One-time $895,004.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Lynn Jacobs / Julianne Sabula For questions, please include Lynn Jacobs, Julianne Sabula, Bret Montgomery and Mike Atkinson This amendment provides the budget for CIP to accomplish the necessary acquisitions and construction related to the Green Bike Expansion grant provided by UDOT. This grant is for $895,004 meant for the purpose of building more bike stations around the city. Through this grant, the city will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed and distributed by UDOT. D-11: Moving Mayor's Funding from Non- Departmental to the Mayor's Office GF One-time ($580,000.00) GF One-time $580,000.00 Department: Mayor’s Office Prepared By: Kathy Nunez For questions, please include Kathy Nunez, Mary Beth Thompson and Lindsey Nikola The purpose of this reallocation/amendment is to consolidate all budget and associated expenditures related to the National League of Cities event into a single cost center. Currently, expenses for this event are split between Cost Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 7 Centers. Centralizing both the budget and expenditures within the Mayor’s Executive Staff cost center (10101) will improve financial transparency and ensure more accurate reporting of total event costs. D-12: Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets CIP One-time ($2,000,000.00) Misc Grants One-time ($2,000,000.00) Misc Grants One-time $2,000,000.00 Storm Water One-time $0.00 Department: Finance Prepared By: Amy Dorsey For questions, please include Amy Dorsey In January of 2022 Salt Lake City was awarded a $2,000,000 grant from the State of Utah, Governor's Office of Planning and Budget office. This grant was part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) the state received from the US Treasury office. The funds from this grant were combined with City ARPA funds to construct new stormwater infrastructure for the benefit of increasing runoff storage and conveyance and reducing FEMA Floodplain Flood Hazard Zones. This funding was received in FY 2022 BA #7 as state grant revenue. At the time these funds were received, a revenue and expenditure budget was established in CIP , however the revenue was never transferred to CIP. Instead, the project was completed and expenses were paid by the stormwater fund. This housekeeping item is to move the money from the state grant fund to replenish the stormwater fund for these expenditures. The amendment will also remove the revenue and expenditure budget in the CIP fund that was established for the project but never used. Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources E-1: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Misc Grants One-time $895,004.00 Department: CAN-Transportation Prepared By: Lynn Jacobs / Julianne Sabula For questions, please include Lynn Jacobs, Julianne Sabula and Tammy Hunsaker This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $895,004 for the purpose of building more bike stations around the city. Through this grant, the city will receive financing from federal aid highway funds that are managed and distributed by UDOT. A corresponding amendment will also establish a budget in CIP. A public hearing was not held since the city didn’t apply for this grant. E-2: COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant Misc Grants One-time $500,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard, and Shellie Dietrich This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $500,000 for the purpose of enhancing de-escalation and crisis response training for the city’s law enforcement. The Salt Lake City Police department has received a COPS grant for the FY 2025 Safer Outcomes: Enhancing De- Escalation and Crisis Response Training for Law Enforcement-Support for Law Enforcement Agencies. The award total of $500,000 will be used for the following: • A virtual reality training simulator, as well as the initial setup and training ∼ $292,950 • Travel training costs for FEMA ICAT Train-the-trainer training and CIT International Conferences ∼ $50,730 • Local and department training in de-escalation and crisis response ∼ $111,825 Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 8 • Overtime for staff providing and receiving training ∼ $44,495 A public hearing on the grant was held 9/2/2025 E-3: Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022 Misc Grants One-time $101,005.00 Department: CAN-Engineering Prepared By: Mark Stephens / Josh Willie For questions, please include Mark Stephens and Josh Willie In FY 2023 council approved a grant application (Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022) on the fiscal year’s consent agenda #8. This budget amendment is to move $101,005 to CIP. Note that this item is related to item D-5 which receives the funding in CIP and creates the expenditure budget. When the grant was awarded, the revenue was recognized, but an expenditure budget to move the funds to CIP was never created. The grant was given for improvements to a railroad crossing on 700 South, so it would be most appropriate to load the budget in PRJ -230003 with the other 700 South project budgets. The current grant worktag is GR-100895 (AWD-000189). Grant awarded in 2023, received as a grant, but never moved to CIP E-4: Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant Misc Grants One-time $26,000.00 Department: CAN Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Katy Lopez For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Katy Lopez and Tammy Hunsaker This amendment is to recognize a grant award in the amount of $26,000 for the purpose of providing nutritious snacks to Youth City program participants. This is a renewal grant from the Utah State Board of Education Chile and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) grant program to provide snacks to Youth City participants. Public hearing is scheduled for 3/24/2026 E-5: Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant Misc Grants One-time $1,000,000.00 Department: Public Lands Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Tyler Murdock For questions, please include Amy Dorsey and Tyler Murdock This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $1,000,000 for the purpose of providing design services for the Civic Center area of downtown Salt Lake City. This funding will be used for a design consultant to develop construction documents for public bidding. The design will consider and respond to the larger network of Civic Center District public spaces, transportation needs and the Downtown neighborhood. Public hearing was held 9/2/2025 E-6: International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services Misc Grants One-time $20,000.00 Department: Police Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Laura Nygaard For questions, please include Amy Dorsey, Laura Nygaard and Shellie Murdock Salt Lake City FY 2025-26 Budget Amendment #5 Initiative Number/Name Fund One-time or Ongoing Amount 9 This budget amendment is to recognize the City's funding availability grant award in the amount of $20,000 for International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services mini-grant. The funds would be used for supplies for outreach items, travel training costs for victim advocate team. Public hearing was held 1/13/2026 Section F: Donations Section G: Consent Agenda Consent Agenda #2 G-1: Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting Project Misc Grants $600,000.00 Department: CRA Prepared By: Amy Dorsey / Cara Lindsley The City Creek Daylighting project along the Folsom Trail is a critical step toward restoring one of Salt Lake City’s historic waterways and reimagining a major west side corridor as a vibrant, accessible public space. This project will uncover a buried section of City Creek between 800 West and 1000 West in the Fairpark neighborhood, where the creek currently runs through a concrete culvert beneath the former Folsom rail line. In its place, a visible, meandering stream will flow alongside the trail, surrounded by native landscaping, seating, lighting, and recreational amenities. These funds will support the completion of construction documents, advancing the project toward implementation. 40% designs to act as a starting point for a new phased approach, and $150,000 invested by the Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency, this is a well-planned, community-driven project that is ready to move forward. The work is rooted in years of community input and shaped by both technical and environmental considerations. Section I: Council Added Items This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 ERIN MENDENHALL Mayor MARY BETH THOMPSON Chief Financial Officer CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL ___________________________________ Date Received: _______________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: __________ ______________________________________________________________________________ TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 4/28/2026 Alejandro Puy, Chair FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FY26 Budget Amendment #5 SPONSOR: NA STAFF CONTACT: Mary Beth Thompson, Randy Hillier DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that subsequent to a public hearing, the City Council adopt the following amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026 adopted budget. BUDGET IMPACT: REVENUE EXPENSE GENERAL FUND $46,941,604.04 $49,574,961.04 AIRPORT FUND 0.00 20,000.00 IMPACT FEES 2,258,501.10 2,219,796.04 IMS FUND 103,700.00 103,700.00 FLEET FUND 2,251,500.00 2,251,500.00 CIP FUND 44,042,798.21 51,272,503.27 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 REFUSE COLLECTION FUND 902,186.00 902,186.00 STORM WATER FUND 2,000,000.00 0.00 MISC GRANTS FUND 3,041,004.00 3,142,009.00 RISK FUND 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 TOTAL $104,313,767.95 $112,259,129.95 BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Revenue for FY 2026 Budget Adjustments The chart below presents General Fund Projected Revenues for FY 2026. Based on revenue data across the first part of the fiscal year, it is projected that revenues will be realized at approximately $3,378,864 beyond the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. Revenue FY26 Annual Budget FY26 Amended Budget Projection Amended Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) Property Taxes 148,580,334 148,580,334 148,580,334 - Sales, Use & Excise Taxes 126,026,000 126,026,000 125,360,000 (666,000) Franchise Taxes 17,220,000 17,220,000 17,140,000 (80,000) Total Taxes 291,826,334 291,826,334 291,080,334 (746,000) Charges For Services 6,686,820 6,686,820 5,006,431 (1,680,389) Fines & Forfeitures 3,085,827 3,220,827 2,977,231 (243,596) Interest Income 9,000,000 9,000,000 9,000,000 - Interfund Service Charges 34,569,169 34,569,169 34,774,907 205,738 Intergovernmental Revenue 6,205,000 6,205,000 6,199,278 (5,722) Licenses 21,847,694 21,847,694 22,666,392 818,698 Miscellaneous Revenue 3,838,663 3,838,663 4,484,128 645,465 Parking Meter Revenue 3,273,255 3,273,255 5,018,737 1,745,482 Parking Tickets 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 - Permits 18,981,859 18,981,859 21,730,107 2,748,248 Property Sale Proceeds - - 64,607 64,607 Gain on Property Dispositions - - 2,545 2,545 Rental & Other Income 1,201,460 1,201,460 1,256,254 54,794 Operating Transfers In 24,780,192 24,780,192 24,879,186 98,994 Total W/O Special Tax 135,669,939 135,804,939 140,259,803 4,454,864 Sales Tax Addition 1/2%58,000,000 58,000,000 58,000,000 - Total General Fund 485,496,273 485,631,273 489,340,137 3,708,864 The table below presents updated Fund Balance numbers and percentages, based on the proposed changes included in Budget Amendment #5. With the complete adoption of Budget Amendment #5, the available fund balance will remain at 16.48 percent of the FY 2026 Adopted Budget. For context, at budget adoption fund balance was at 12.93 percent. FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL Beginning Fund Balance 27,841,978 146,448,554 174,290,532 19,731,675 104,201,060 142,867,679 Prior Year Encumbrances (3,547,119) (18,657,815) (22,204,934) - - (18,919,920) Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 24,294,859$ 127,790,739$ 152,085,598$ 19,731,675$ 104,201,060$ 123,947,759$ Beginning Fund Balance Percent 39.57%30.50%31.66%33.59%22.96%24.19% Year End ACFR Adjustments Revenue Changes Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,188,435) (3,188,435) (15,024) (15,024) Fund Balance w/ ACFR Changes 24,294,859 124,602,304 148,897,163 19,731,675 104,186,036 123,932,735 Final Fund Balance Percent 39.57% 29.74% 30.99% 33.59% 22.96% 24.18% Budgeted Change in Fund Balance (4,162,906) (36,664,442) (40,827,348) - (26,864,250) (26,864,250) Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance BA#1 Revenue Adjustment 469,408 469,408 BA#1 Expense Adjustment (2,468,933) (2,468,933) (358,000) (358,000) BA#2 Revenue Adjustment 102,000 102,000 BA#2 Expense Adjustment (3,407,524) (3,407,524) (913,000) (913,000) BA#3 Revenue Adjustment 3,904,861 3,904,861 BA#3 Expense Adjustment (3,959,861) (3,959,861) BA#4 Revenue Adjustment - - BA#4 Expense Adjustment - - (8,700,923) (8,700,923) BA#5 Revenue Adjustment 1,013,067 1,013,067 46,941,604 46,941,604 BA#5 Expense Adjustment (5,200,000) (4,736,688) (9,936,688) (49,574,961) (49,574,961) BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - BA#6 Expense Adjustment Change in Revenue Change in Expense Fund Balance Budgeted Increase Adjusted Fund Balance 19,731,675 104,201,060 123,932,735 19,731,675 64,716,506 84,463,205 Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 32.14% 24.87% 25.80% 33.59% 14.26% 16.48% Projected Revenue 61,397,384 419,006,975 480,404,359 58,749,999 453,745,525 512,495,524 FY2026 BudgetFY2025 Budget Salt Lake City General Fund TOTAL Fund Balance Projections The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $46,941,604 in revenue and $49,547,961 in expenses in the General Fund. The amendment proposes changes in eleven (11) funds, with a total revenue increase of $104,313,768 and a corresponding expenditure increase of $112,259,130. The proposal includes the addition of thirteen (13) general fund-funded positions. A summary spreadsheet outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council. The budget amendment is separated in eight different categories: A. New Budget Items B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources C. Grants for New Staff Resources D. Housekeeping Items E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources F. Donations G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards I. Council Added Items PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 STRAW POLLS CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Jennifer Bruno, Lehua Weaver, Austin Kimmel, Kira Luke, Allison Rowland, Sylvia Richards, Michael Sanders, and Kate Werrett DATE:May 19, 2026 RE: STRAW POLL – FY26 BUDGET AMENDMENT #5 The Administration has requested straw polls for item A-2: Inland Port Related Police Expenses and Revenues so the Police Department may facilitate hiring for the May 2026 academy class. Please see pages 3 and 4 of the FY26 Budget Amendment #5 Council Staff Report for more information. Straw Poll Question YES NO Does the Council support the Administration proceeding with hiring for the May 2026 police academy class to fill the 12 sworn and one civilian position funded through the interlocal agreement with the Utah Inland Port Authority? FY2026 Budget Amendment #5 Revenue Forecast FINANCE DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT Revenue Update (-) Sales, Use and Excise Tax: Decrease due to natural gas tax Mild weather, subdued prices based on industry trends (-) Charges For Services: Due to reduction in Police Secondary Employment FY26 Budget was developed during contract negotiation Correlated to expenditures, Budget Neutral (+) Miscellaneous Revenue: Fire Reimbursement from Palisades Fire in CA and flooding in NM (+) Parking Meter Revenue: Increase due to increase to rates and hours (+) Permits: Increase due to building permit related activities Budget Amendment #5 FINANCE DEPARTMENT $49,574,961 IN EXPENSES IN THE GENERAL FUND. CHANGES IN ELEVEN (11) FUNDS, WITH A TOTAL REVENUE INCREASE OF $104,313,768 AND A CORRESPONDING EXPENDITURE INCREASE OF $112,259,130 THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF THIRTEEN (13) GENERAL FUND POSITIONS. Revenue Expense General Fund $46,941,604.04 $49,574,961.04 Airport Fund 0.00 20,000.00 Impact Fees 2,258,501.10 2,219,796.04 IMS Fund 103,700.00 103,700.00 Fleet Fund 2,251,500.00 2,251,500.00 CIP Fund 44,042,798.21 51,272,503.27 Debt Service Fund 1,062,474.60 1,062,474.60 Refuse Collection Fund 902,186.00 902,186.00 Storm Water Fund 2,000,000.00 0.00 Misc Grants Fund 3,041,004.00 3,142,009.00 Risk Fund 1,710,000.00 1,710,000.00 TOTAL $104,313,767.95 $112,259,129.95 Fund Balance FINANCE DEPARTMENT Budget Amendment #5 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Section A: New Items: Eight (8) Items Section D: Housekeeping: Twelve (12) Items Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources: Six (6) Items Section G: Council Consent Agenda: One (1) Item New Items FINANCE DEPARTMENT A-1: Reclass Airport Director of Finance Pay Grade: Airport, $20K A-2: UIPA Inland Port Related Expenses and Revenues: GF, $2.58 Mill / GF $2.5 Mill / IMS, $103K / Fleet, $1.25 Mill A-3: Workers Compensation Premiums: GF, $1.73 Mill A-4:Property Tax Pass-through (Library) : GF, $33.19 Mill A-5: Property Tax Pass-through (CRA True-up): GF, $4.53 Mill A-6: Property Tax Pass-through (CRA) to the Library: GF, $2.31 Mill A-7: Increase in Workers Compensation Premiums: Risk, $1.71 Mill A-8: Fund Transfer to Fleet for Police Department Vehicles: GF, $1.0 Mill / Fleet, $1.0 Mill Housekeeping Items FINANCE DEPARTMENT D-1: 400 South Bridge Funding Rescope: CIP, $0.00 D-2: Budgeting All Funding Available for the Old Library, Plaza 349 and the Justice Court Capital Improvements: CIP, $4.48 Mill D-3: Sustainability's Environmental & Energy Division Housekeeping and Utah Renewable Communities Startup Costs: GF/Refuse, $902k D-4: Park Land Acquisition: Impact Fees, $405K D-5: UDOT Railroad Safety Grant Funded Railroad Crossing Improvements on 700 South: CIP, $101k D-6: CIP: CPTED Assessments, New Street Lights and Other Improvements: GF/CIP, $200k Housekeeping Items FINANCE DEPARTMENT D-7: Impact Fee Excess Capacity & Interest Income: Impact Fees/GF, $1.81 Mill / CIP $443K D-8: CIP Transfer to General Fund Correction: CIP, $6.78 Mill D-9: General Obligation Series 2026 Bonds (Parks, Trails, and Open Space second tranche): Debt Serv, $1.06 Mill / CIP, $49.33 Mill D-10: UDOT Green Bike Expansion Grant Supplied CIP: CIP, $895K D-11: Moving Mayor’s Funding from Non-Departmental to the Mayor’s Office: GF, $0.00 D-12: Moving State ARPA Funds from Grant Fund to Public Utilities / Remove CIP Budgets: CIP/Misc Grants, -$2 Mill / Misc Grants, $2 Mill Grant Items FINANCE DEPARTMENT E-1: UDOT Green Bike Expansion: Misc Grants, $895K E-2: COPS FY 25 De Escalation Grant: Misc Grants, $500K E-3: Utah Dept. of Transportation, Railroad Safety Grant 2022: Misc Grants, $101K E-4: Utah State of Education Child and Adult Care Food Program Grant: Misc Grants, $26K E-5: Salt Lake County Tourism, Recreation, Cultural, Convention and Airport (TRCC) Grant: Misc Grants, $1 Mill E-6: International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) Law Enforcement-Based Victim Services: Misc Grants, $20K Consent Agenda Items FINANCE DEPARTMENT G-1: Outdoor Recreation Initiative (ORI) City Creek Daylighting Project: Misc Grants, $600K Questions Item D1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Council Staff DATE:June 9, 2026 RE: Advice and Consent: Salt Lake City Chief Judicial Nominating Commission Members – Kate Fairchild and David Quealy MOTION 1 – APPROVE I move that the Council approve the appointment of Kate Fairchild and David Quealy as Salt Lake City’s Judicial Nominating Commission Members. SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 05/28/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/28/2026 From: Department * Mayor Employee Name: Otto, Rachel E-mail rachel.otto@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 05/28/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 05/28/2026 Subject: Appointment of Kate Fairchild and David Quealy as Salt Lake City's Judicial Nominating Commission Members Additional Staff Contact: Kate Fairchild katief@utcourts.govDavid Quealy david.quealy@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Kate Fairchild katief@utcourts.govRachel Otto rachel.otto@slc.gov Document Type Information Item Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Conﬁrm appointment of Kate Fairchild and David Quealy as Salt Lake City’s Judicial Nominating Commission Members Background/Discussion Following an assessment by the Utah Administrative Oﬃce of the Courts (“AOC”) showing that the Salt Lake City Justice Court requires a sixth judge to handle the number of cases the court must hear, the City Council authorized the Justice Court to begin the hiring process for a new judge. As part of the process, the AOC forms a Nominating Commission to vet applicants and send nominees to the Mayor. According to the Utah Judiciary’s “Manual of Procedures for Justice Court Nominating Commissions,” justice court nominating commissions and their composition are established by statute. A county justice court nominating commission will be created when there is a vacant justice court judge position or when a new position is created. Membership of the justice court nominating commission must include: 1. One member appointed by the county commission if the county has a commission form of government OR The county executive if the county has an executive-council form of government2. One member appointed by the municipalities in the counties as follows:a. If the county has only one municipality, appointment will be made by the governing body of that municipality; orb. If the county has more than one municipality, appointment will be made by a municipal selection committee composed of the mayors of each municipality in the county3. One member appointed by the county bar association. If there is no county bar association, the member will be appointed by the regional bar association. If no regional bar association exists, the state bar association will make the appointment4. Two members appointed by the governing authority of the jurisdiction where the judicial o ﬃce is located. Based on their experience and insight into City priorities and the Justice Court system, Mayor Mendenhall has selected Justice Court Administrator Kate Fairchild and Senior City Attorney David Quealy to serve on the Nominating Commission as Salt Lake City's members. Below are brief biographies of Kate and David. Kate Fairchild is the Court Administrator for the Salt Lake City Justice Court, where she oversees court operations, strategic planning, budgeting, legislative aﬀairs, and intergovernmental initiatives. Since joining the court in 2024, she has led signi ﬁcant operational and organizational initiatives, including the expansion of court staﬃng and judicial resources, development of the court’s Mobile Court program, and implementation of long-term strategic planning eﬀorts in partnership with the National Center for State Courts. Prior to serving as Court Administrator, Kate worked in multiple areas of the justice system, including judicial support, case management, training, civil, criminal, family law, and civil commitment proceedings. She also previously worked within the Utah State Board of Education’s legislative division. David Quealy is a Senior City Attorney with the Salt Lake City Attorney’s Oﬃce. He currently represents the Salt Lake City Legislative Aﬀairs Division and advises on First Amendment, election law, and government records issues. Prior to joining Salt Lake City, David worked as the Deputy City Attorney for the City of West Jordan overseeing the civil, litigation, victim advocate, and risk management divisions of the city attorney’s oﬃce. In that role, he also served as the primary legal counsel for West Jordan’s Police Department, Fire Department, Human Resources Department, and advised on government records appeals, internal investigations, and the First Amendment. David has also worked as a civil litigator for Salt Lake County, an Assistant Attorney General assigned to UDOT eminent domain litigation, and as a litigator in private practice. Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank Item E1 CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 MOTION SHEET CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel Public Policy Analyst DATE:June 9, 2026 RE: MOTION SHEET: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO DESIGNATE SUGAR HOUSE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA MOTION 1 – ADOPT I move that the Council adopt the resolution of intention to designate an assessment area for economic promotion activities in Sugar House over a three-year period. Staff note: this resolution is the first legislative step to establish a new Special Assessment Area (SAA) in the core commercial area of Sugar House focused on economic promotion. It is anticipated to begin in 2027. MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT I move that the Council not adopt and proceed to the next agenda item. MOTION 3 – DEFER ACTION I move the Council defer action to a future Council meeting. CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476 SLCCOUNCIL.COM TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY TO:City Council Members FROM: Austin Kimmel DATE:May 28, 2026 RE: RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO DESIGNATE SUGAR HOUSE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE early 2027 and is projected to raise $1,697,640 over the area’s proposed three-year period. The full tentative timeline for establishing the SAA is on pages 10 and 11 of the administrative transmittal. It is also included as a separate attachment (Attachment A) to this staff report. Goal of the briefing: To learn about the steps in establishing two special assessment areas (SAAs) for economic promotion activities in the Sugar House neighborhood and for special lighting and signage on specific properties. Item Schedule: nd Briefing and Council Action: October 20, 2026 Page | 2 POLICY QUESTIONS 1. The Council may wish to ask how the Department of Economic Development plans to communicate with property owners during the SAA establishment process and what ongoing reporting will keep them informed about the services and benefits they can expect from the SHBD-27 assessment. 2. The Council may wish to ask whether the infrastructure to support year-round specialty lighting along 2100 South, 1100 East, and Highland Drive already exists or if upfront capital investment is required. If upfront capital investment is required, the Council could ask whether those costs would be covered by the SAA or through another avenue. 3. The Council could ask at what point into the term of the SAA property owners along streets designated for specialty lighting can expect to see lighting and signage installed. 4. The Council may wish to ask how the entity selected to manage the SAA will be chosen and what the competitive selection process will look like. 5. The Council could ask how disputes or complaints about the services delivered from assessed property owners will be managed during the three-year term. 6. The Council may ask the department to elaborate on its decision not to include multifamily properties with five or more units in the SAA. In Fall 2021, the Sugar House Chamber & Community Alliance (SHC) officially requested the creation of an economic promotion SAA. Following this, the City Council allocated $60,000 to cover research and feasibility costs for the special assessment in Sugar House. Since then, the Department of Economic Development held meetings with SHC and Zions Public Finance to discuss the SAA creation process and potential financial scenarios for the assessment area. Those meetings paused to allow planned road construction in Sugar House until its completion in 2025, when conversations resumed. Economic Development and SHC have worked with property owners to gauge support, determine desired assessment types and rates, and identify services provided under the SAA. The following sections provide an overview of the proposed SAA boundaries and the proposed and preferred financial scenario. Per the Notice of Intent Resolution included in the Administrative Transmittal, the proposed boundaries of the base Sugar House Business District SAA are: A. Ramona Avenue from 700 East to 1200 East B. 1200 East from Ramona Avenue to Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 S 1200 East C. Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East from 1200 East to Alley 12884 D. Alley 12884 from Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East to Douglas Street E. Alley 12109 from Douglas Street to Alley 13236 F. Alley 13236 from Alley 12109 to 1300 East G. 1300 East from Alley 13236 to North right-of-way line of I-80 H. North right-of-way line of I-80 from 1300 East to 1100 East I. 1100 East from North right-of-way line of I-80 to Sugarmont Drive J. Sugarmont Drive from S McClelland Street to 900 East K. 900 East from Sugarmont Drive to Simpson Avenue Page | 3 L. Simpson Avenue from 900 East to 700 East M. 700 East from Simpson Avenue to Ramona Avenue The Lighting/Signage Assessment would apply to the following streets: A. On 2100 South from 900 East to 1300 East B. On 1100 East from Ramona Avenue to 2100 South C. On Highland Drive from 2100 South to Stringham Avenue Proposed Sugar House SAA map Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Department of Economic Development ESTIMATED REVENUE & BUDGET The Sugar House Chamber & Community Alliance reviewed the financial scenarios below and preferred Scenario 3. Scenario 3 includes a base assessment rate of 0.00249 and a final budget of $1,412,762 for the 3-year assessment period. The preferred special lighting and signage assessment is $13 per linear foot of frontage along 2100 South, Highland Drive, and 1100 East. However, the lighting and signage assessment will depend on the cost of the lighting contract selected by the entity responsible for managing the Sugar House Assessment Area. Multifamily housing with five or more units is eligible to be assessed and included in an SAA. However, it was decided not to include these properties due to sensitivity to housing costs. They could be considered in future assessment authorizations after the initial three-year term. Page | 4 Copied from page 6 of the Administrative Transmittal Preferred financial scenario, Scenario 3, outlined in red TENTATIVE SHBD-27 BUDGET Copied from page 7 of the Administrative Transmittal Page | 5 Copied from page 8 of the Administrative Transmittal ADDITIONAL KEY POINTS If property owners holding 40% or more of the total valuation in the SAA protest its creation, the area cannot be created. The following properties are exempt from the SHBD-27 SAA: parcels valued under $20,000, residential, ecclesiastical, and government-owned properties. Property owners are assessed the full amount when the SAA is created but may pay in three annual installments over its term. Properties are assessed using the 2025 taxable property values. Properties along the identified street frontage for the special lighting/signage assessment receive an additional assessment based on linear feet along those identified streets. Properties cannot be added to the SAA after the Notice of Intent is issued without the property owner’s consent. However, they can be removed at the Council’s discretion before the assessment starts. Instead of special lighting only during the holiday season, as is the case in the Central Business Improvement Area SAA, the Sugar House Chamber & Community Alliance has requested year-round specialty lighting. The City will establish a management contract through March 2030 to provide promotional activities for the SAA, subject to its creation. State statute caps total administrative costs (City costs + contractor costs) at 30% of the total SAA budget. Economic Development would be responsible for this monitoring and annual reporting on the City’s website. In first year of the assessment, $60,000 (allocated in FY22 Budget Amendment No. 4) would be earmarked from City Administrative Costs to reimburse the City’s General Fund. Page | 6 According to the tentative timeline, the Administration anticipates the SAA effective date as March 21, 2027, with assessment payments due April 6, 2027. According to the resolution, promotional activities include: “advertising campaigns, newsletters, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services including connection to social services through the Ambassadors & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects.” NEXT STEPS On June 9, the Council is tentatively scheduled to take action on the Resolution of Intention to Designate the SHBD-27 and on August 18 the Council will hold a protest hearing. The protest hearing gives property owners an opportunity to object to the creation of the assessment area, their inclusion in it, or the proposed services. It also opens a 60-day window for filing written protests. If property owners holding 40% or more of the total valuation in the SAA protest its creation, then the SAA cannot be created, and the process ends. Following the protest hearing, if the process continues, the Council will consider the Resolution to Designate the assessment area and appoint a Board of Equalization (BOE). The BOE process is separate from the protest period. At that stage, the question is no longer whether to create the SAA but whether adjustments to individual assessment amounts or property inclusions are warranted based on the benefit a property receives from the proposed services. Finally, the process concludes with the Council's consideration of the Assessment Ordinance, which would officially establish the SHBD-27. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Sugar House SAA Tentative Timeline Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2026 A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, was held on June 9, 2026, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at which meeting there were present and answering to roll call the following members who constituted a quorum: Alejandro Puy Chair Erika Carlsen Vice-Chair Chris Wharton Councilmember Victoria Petro Councilmember Dan Dugan Councilmember Sarah Young Councilmember Also present: Erin Mendenhall Mayor Mark Kittrell City Attorney Keith Reynolds City Recorder Absent: Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were duly had and taken: The following resolution was introduced in writing, was read by title, and Councilmember ____________ moved its adoption: 2 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 RESOLUTION NO. ___ of 2026 A Resolution of intention of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), to designate an Assessment Area for the purpose of levying assessments against properties within the Assessment Area to promote business activity and economic development in the Sugar House neighborhood of the City by assessing benefited properties within the Assessment Area for the costs of such economic promotion activities for a period of three years (the “Assessments”); and to fix a time and place for protests against the Assessment Area and its assessments, and related matters. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. The City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), hereby determines that it will be in the best interest of the City to promote economic growth activities in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City. The proposed activities are more specifically described hereafter, but generally will include, but will not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services, including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects (collectively, the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood as described hereafter and more specifically identified on maps and plans on file in the Office of the City Recorder of the City. In order to accomplish the Economic Promotion Activities, the City proposes to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. DA-SHBD-27 (the “Assessment Area”) pursuant to Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), the area of which is more particularly described in the Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area set out hereafter. Section 2. A portion of the cost of the Economic Promotion Activities shall be paid by a special assessment to be levied against business and commercial properties situated within the Assessment Area that are specially benefited by the Economic Promotion Activities. The assessment will have two components: (i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) an assessment on certain properties by linear feet for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the properties within the Assessment Area and the proposed Assessment related to each property. The Assessment may be paid when assessed or, at the option of the property owner, in three (3) annual installments with interest on any delinquent installment until paid. Section 3. The Council shall hold a public hearing on August 18, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area as set forth in the Act. Thereafter, written protests from property owners against the proposed assessments may be filed in the Office of the City Recorder of the City, whose address is 451 South State Street, Room 415, for a period of 60 days after the date of the public hearing. On October 20, 2026, (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest 3 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 period expires), at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. The Council may thereafter adopt a resolution abandoning or creating the proposed Assessment Area depending on whether adequate protests have been filed. The City Recorder is hereby directed to give notice of intention to designate the Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) to finance and support the Economic Promotion Activities. The Notice of Intention shall specify the date of the public hearing and the time within which protests against the proposed assessments may be filed. The Notice of Intention shall be published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing. As a Class B Notice, the City Recorder shall mail a copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to each owner of property to be assessed within the Assessment Area at the last known mailing address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses of said owners appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, Utah, and, in addition, a copy of the Notice of Intention shall be mailed, postage prepaid, addressed to “Owner” at the street number of each piece of improved property to be affected by the Assessment. If a street number has not been so assigned, then the post office box, rural route number, or any other mailing address of the improved property shall be used for the mailing of the Notice of Intention. Said Notice of Intention shall be in substantially the following form: 4 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DESIGNATE ASSESSMENT AREA PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on June 9, 2026, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) declaring its intention to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. DA-SHBD-27 (the “Assessment Area”) to finance a portion of the cost of economic promotion activities, which are more specifically described hereafter (the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City within the Assessment Area and to levy a special assessment (the “Assessment” or “Assessments”) for a period of three years as provided in Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), on real property situated within the Assessment Area for the benefit of which such assessments are to be expended in the management and costs of the Economic Promotion Activities. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT AREA The Assessment Area is described by reference to the following streets (the “Reference Streets”): A – Ramona Avenue from 700 East to 1200 East B – 1200 East from Ramona Avenue to Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 S 1200 East C – Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East from 1200 East to Alley 12884 D – Alley 12884 from Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East to Douglas Street E – Alley 12109 from Douglas Street to Alley 13236 F -- Alley 13236 from Alley 12109 to 1300 East G – 1300 East from Alley 13236 to North right-of-way line of I-80 H – North right-of-way line of I-80 from 1300 East to 1100 East I – 1100 East from North right-of-way line of I-80 to Sugarmont Drive J – Sugarmont Drive from S McClelland Street to 900 East K – 900 East from Sugarmont Drive to Simpson Avenue L – Simpson Avenue from 900 East to 700 East M – 700 East from Simpson Avenue to Ramona Avenue The area of the Assessment Area shall include all property bounded by Reference Streets A through M described above. The Lighting/Signage Assessment (as described herein) shall apply to the following streets (collectively, the “Lighting/Signage Streets”): A – On 2100 South from 900 East to 1300 East B – On 1100 East from Ramona Avenue to 2100 South C – On Highland Drive from 2100 South to Stringham Avenue 5 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The Resolution, maps, and other information about the Assessment Area are available for examination during business hours in the offices of the Salt Lake City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah. ACTIVITIES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT AREA The “Economic Promotion Activities” shall include, but not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects. The Economic Promotion activities will take place within the boundaries of the Assessment Area for the benefit of business and commercial property owners within the Assessment Area. The City will establish a management contract through March 2030 for purposes of promotional activities for the Assessment Area, subject to the creation of the Assessment Area. ASSESSMENT RATE, FINANCIAL PLAN, AND SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Funds received from the Assessments and the estimated cost of the Economic Promotion Activities are as follows: Sources of Funds* Uses of Funds* __________________ * Figures have been rounded and may not sum due to rounding. The Assessment is proposed to be levied on benefited property within the Assessment Area to pay for a portion of the Economic Promotion Activities according to the estimated benefits to 6 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 the property from such activities. The Economic Promotion Activities will not be financed with bonds. PROPERTIES EXCLUDED FROM ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS Residential, ecclesiastical, and government-owned properties shall be excluded from Assessments unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City and the owners of such properties. Subject to the foregoing sentence, only business and commercial properties shall be assessed. In addition, any properties having a taxable value of less than $20,000 based upon the most recent real property assessment roll of Salt Lake County shall be excluded from Assessments. The determination of qualification for exclusion for ecclesiastical and government-owned property shall be based upon exemptions from ad valorem real property taxes for properties used by churches for non-commercial purposes and for properties owned and operated by governmental agencies. Inasmuch as the Assessment is intended to fund economic promotion activities, the City does not find any benefits for residential, ecclesiastical and/or governmental property excluded from the Assessment. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT It is proposed to levy a one-time Assessment for a three-year period on property in the Assessment Area to pay all or a portion of the estimated costs of the Economic Promotion Activities within the Assessment Area. The Assessment shall not exceed the benefits derived by the properties within the Assessment Area. There shall be two assessment components: (i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) an assessment based on linear feet (except that corner lots will not be assessed for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties with frontage on the Lighting/Signage Streets for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Assessments shall be payable in full or in three (3) annual installments (the “Assessment Installment” or “Installments”). If payable in three (3) Installments, the first Installment will fall due fifteen (15) days after the effective date of the ordinance levying the Assessment (the “Assessment Ordinance”). The total Assessment for the benefited property related to this notice is detailed in the cover letter accompanying this notice. The first Installment is currently estimated to be due on approximately April 5, 2027. The second and third Installments will fall due on the first and second anniversary dates of the first Installment. If any Installment is not paid by the due date, the unpaid Installment(s) will accumulate delinquent interest and/or charges in accordance with the Assessment Ordinance and State law. The Assessments will be collected by directly billing property owners. The City doesn’t currently expect any adjustments to the Assessments for changes in costs associated with Economic Promotion Activities. The City will ensure that no Assessments will be collected and used for purposes other than those described in this Notice. PUBLIC HEARING 7 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The City Council shall hold a public hearing on August 18, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area and all persons desiring to be heard, as set forth in the Act. TIME FOR FILING PROTESTS PROTESTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS OBJECTING TO THE ASSESSMENT AREA DESIGNATION OR OBJECTING TO BEING ASSESSED FOR THE PROPOSED ECONOMIC PROMOTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE FILED IN WRITING WITH THE CITY RECORDER OF SALT LAKE CITY EITHER IN PERSON DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY OR BY MAIL (PO BOX 145515) ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 19, 2026. To be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area, protests or objections MUST BE IN WRITING, signed by the owners of the property proposed to be assessed. The written protest must describe or otherwise identify said property. If the aggregate taxable value of property that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate taxable value of all property within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Base Assessment, and if the linear feet frontage of the Lighting/Signage Streets (except that corner lots will not apply for both frontages as applicable, only one) that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate linear feet frontage of Lighting/Signage Streets assessed within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Lighting/Signage Assessment. Protests withdrawn prior to the expiration of the protest period and protests from areas deleted from the Assessment Area will not be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area. On Tuesday, October 20, 2026 (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest period expires), at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah, the City Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. To stay informed on the electronic means or physical location of the City Council’s hearings and meetings, please visit www.slc.gov/council/agendas. The City shall post the total and percentage of the written protests it has received on its website at least five days before such meeting. 8 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH /s/ Keith Reynolds City Recorder 9 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Councilmember __________ seconded the motion to adopt the foregoing resolution. The motion and resolution were unanimously adopted on the following recorded vote: AYE: NAY: 10 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 After the conduct of other business not pertinent to the above, the meeting was, on motion duly made and seconded, adjourned. (SEAL) By:_________________________________ Chair ATTEST: By: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___/s/ Sara Montoya____________________ Sara Montoya Senior City Attorney 11 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or disapproval on __________, 2026. By: Chair MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this __________, 2026. By: Mayor 12 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify as follows: (a) That the foregoing typewritten pages constitute a full, true, and correct copy of the record of proceedings of the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held in Salt Lake City on June 9, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., insofar as said proceedings relate to the consideration and adoption of a resolution declaring the intention of the City Council to designate the Salt Lake City, Sugar House Assessment Area No. DA-SHBD-27 to provide economic promotion activities therein described as the same appears of record in my office; that I personally attended said meeting, and that the proceedings were in fact held as in said minutes specified. (b) That due, legal, and timely notice of said meeting was served upon all members as required by law and the rules and ordinances of Salt Lake City. (c) That the above resolution was provided to my office on __________, 2026, has been recorded by me, and is a part of the permanent records of Salt Lake City, Utah. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and affixed the seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 13 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING : ss. NOTICE OF INTENTION COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify that a Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) was approved and adopted in the proceedings of the City Council held on Tuesday, June 9, 2026. I further certify that the Notice of Intention was published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing (August 18, 2026). I further certify that on ___________, 2026, I mailed a true copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid to each owner of land to be assessed within the proposed Assessment Area at the last known address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, and in addition I mailed on the same date a copy of said Notice of Intention addressed to “Owner” addressed to the street number, post office box, rural route number, or other mailing address of each piece of improved property to be affected by the assessment. I further certify that a certified copy of said Notice of Intention, together with profiles of the improvements or economic promotion activities and a map of the proposed Assessment Area, was on file in my office for inspection by any interested parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 14 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Keith Reynolds, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City Council”) in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (“Utah Code”), I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the June 9, 2026, public meeting held by the City Council (“Notice”), by causing the Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1: (i) to be posted at the anchor location for the meeting at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; (ii) to be posted to the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and (iii) to be posted on the City’s official website at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. In addition, the Notice of 2026 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be posted at least annually (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) at the anchor location for the meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this __________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 15 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 1 MEETING NOTICE 16 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 2 ANNUAL MEETING NOTICE A-1 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 EXHIBIT A SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 05/07/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/08/2026 From: Department * Economic Development Employee Name: Gibbs, Colin E-mail Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 05/07/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 05/08/2026 Subject: Resolution of Intention to Designate Sugar House Special Assessment Area - 2026.05.08 Additional Staff Contact: Lorena Riﬀo Jenson, Director of Business Development - lorena.riﬀojenson@slc.gov Colin Gibbs, Business Development Division Director – Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Liz Ward, Project Manager – Liz.Ward@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Lorena Riﬀo Jenson, Director of Business Development - lorena.riﬀojenson@slc.gov Colin Gibbs, Business Development Division Director – Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Liz Ward, Project Manager – Liz.Ward@slc.gov Document Type Resolution Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Administration recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution of Intention to designate the Sugar House Business District 2027 (SHBD-27). Background/Discussion See ﬁrst attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ERIN MENDENHALL MAYOR LORENA RIFFO JENSON DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL _______________________ Date Received: ___________ Jill Love, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ____________ DATE: May 8, 2026 FROM: Lorena Riffo Jenson, Director of the Department of Economic Development SUBJECT: Resolution of Intention to Designate Sugar House Special Assessment Area STAFF CONTACTS: Colin Gibbs, Business Development Division Director – Colin.Gibbs@slc.gov Liz Ward, Project Manager – Liz.Ward@slc.gov DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Administration recommends the City Council adopt the Resolution of Intention to designate the Sugar House Business District 202 7 (SHBD-27). This establishes a Special Assessment Area (SAA) in the core commercial area of Sugar House and breaks out a secondary assessment for holiday lighting/signage (area map attached) for a three-year period. BUDGET IMPACT: The budget summary for the City is detailed starting on page 4 under the section “Financial Summary for SHBD-27.” BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: In Fall of 2021, the Department of Economic Development (DED) received a request from the Sugar House Chamber & Community Alliance (SHC) regarding the creation of an economic promotion special assessment area (SAA) for the Sugar House area. In FY22, Budget Amendment #4, the City Council allocated $60,000 to cover costs associated with the research and feasibility of a special assessment within Sugar House. Following this request, staff members from DED convened meetings with representatives from the SHC and Zions Public Finance to discuss the overall process and review potential scenarios for an assessment area. Given planned road construction in Sugar House, the SHC decided to pause the creation of the SAA closer to construction completion. Following construction completion in 2025, the SHC sent an updated request to DED to resume the administrative process to establish an SAA. DED has been working with SHC leadership to confirm property owners’ support, desired rates and types of the assessment, and services that will be provided under the SAA. 2 The creation of special assessment areas is a lengthy and complex process that is governed by State law, has numerous noticing provisions, public hearings, and other requirements that involve a variety of City Council actions over the next year. Below are each of the potential scenarios for the assessment area and have been reviewed by the Sugar House Chamber & Community Alliance (SHC). In each of the scenarios the boundaries remain the same, due to the majority of the areas outside the boundaries being heavily residential and lacking in commercial properties. Sugar House Area map/boundaries (Ramona Avenue on the north, 1300 East on the east, I -15 on the south down to Fairmont Park to Sugarmont Drive and then Sugarmont Drive to 900 East and then Simpson Avenue down to 700 East, and 700 E on the west.) 3 Proposed Primary Assessment Scenarios Estimated Revenue & Budget Options Scenario 1: Multifamily 5+ units and Commercial Scenario 2: Commercial Only Scenario 3: Commercial Only (Inflation-Adjusted Rate) Rate 0.00225 0.00225 0.00249 Primary Assessment $2,439,163 $1,437,725 $1,591,027 Lighting/Signage ($13/ft) $106,613 $106,613 $106,613 Total Revenue $2,545,776 $1,544,338 $1,697,640 City Administrative Costs (One Time Fee - Includes Management, Professional and Technical, Legal, Printing, and Postage) $228,280 $228,280 $228,280 Reserve (3%) $76,373 $46,330 $50,929 Salt Lake City Expenses Subtotal $304,653 $274,610 $279,209 Contract Recipient Budget $2,241,123 $1,269,727 $1,418,430 (Revenue & Budget over 3 years) The SHC representatives have reviewed each of the scenarios and prefer Scenario 3. They expressed that revenue from Scenario 3 is the most sufficient to manage and operate an economic promotion area, while still being acceptable to Sugar House commercial property owners. Additionally, multifamily housing with five or more units is eligible to be included in an SAA, but given sensitivity to housing costs, it was determined to not include these properties at the time of this assessment. Note that during the first year of the assessment, $60,000 would be earmarked from the City Administrative Costs to reimburse the City’s General Fund that was allocated in FY22, Budget Amendment #4. Additionally, state statute places a cap on administrative costs at a total 30% across the total revenue from the assessment. These costs include the City’s administrative costs as well as the administrative costs from the contractor chosen to manage the assessment area. DED will monitor these costs throughout the life of the assessment and complete the state-required yearly reporting on the City’s website. 4 Secondary Assessment: Specialty Lighting & Signage Lighting/Signage Area - Commercial 2100 S Parcel Frontage (feet) 4,728 Highland Dr. - 1100 E Parcel Frontage (feet) 3,473 Total Lighting Area Parcel Frontage (feet) 8,201 Revenue $13/ft $106,613 (Along 2100 South from 700 East to 1300 East and along 1100 East/Highland Drive from Ramona Avenue to Stringham Avenue.) Due to the regulations in State code, taxable value cannot be the sole assessment method, and a secondary assessment is required. The Central Business Improvement Area (Downtown) has, since its inception in 1991, implemented a secondary (holiday/specialty lighting) assessment based on the linear frontage of participating parcels. The SHC has indicated to DED that they would like the same for Sugar House. In addition, instead of only holiday lighting they would like to incorporate the specialty lighting year-round. If future road construction or disruptions to light pole locations happens, secondary assessment funds can also be used to provide temporary signage to all businesses not benefiting from specialty lighting to highlight those businesses, inform their customers they are open during construction, and drive customers to those businesses up until the time that specialty lighting is restored. DED has confirmed with the City Attorney’s Office that this is an appropriate use of secondary assessment funds. Financial Summary for SHBD-27 Revenue for SHBD-27 2025 Taxable Property Valuation $638,988,678 Proposed Taxable Value Assessment Rate 0.00249 Taxable Value Assessment Subtotal $1,591,082 2025 Linear Footage for Holiday Lights /Signage 8,201 Proposed Holiday Light/Signage Rate per Foot $13 Holiday Light Assessment Subtotal $106,613 Total Assessment Revenue $1,697,640 (Figures have been rounded to the nearest dollar amount) 5 Tentative Budget for SHBD-27 Salt Lake City Expenses City Administrative Cost $151,200 Professional and Technical $37,800 Legal Fees $30,000 Printing $6,300 Postage Fees $3,780 Reserve (3%) $50,929 Salt Lake City Expenses Subtotal $279,209 Contract Recipient Budget Economic Development & District Promotion $397,160 Marketing, Events, & Cultural Promotion $312,055 Ambassador Program & Public Realm Services $482,266 Administration $226,949 Contract Recipient Subtotal $1,418,430 Total Use of Funds $1,697,640 (Figures have been rounded to the nearest dollar amount) Special Stipulations Parcels under $20,000 in valuation as well as residential, ecclesiastical and government owned properties are exempt from the assessment, except those whose owners agree in writing to be assessed. By State law, properties that are not included in the initial Notice of Intent cannot be added at a later date unless the property owner consents. However, properties may be removed from the SAA at the Council’s discretion prior to assessment. Property owners are assessed the full amount but may pay the assessment in three annual installments. If owners of 40% or more of the valuation in the SAA boundaries protest the creation of the SAA, the area cannot be created. No more than 30% of the assessment funds can be spent on administrative expenses. Conclusion The SHC’s preferred base rate assessment is Scenario 3, with a rate of 0.002 49, and a final budget of $1,412,762 for the 3-year assessment period. The SHC’s preferred holiday/lighting and signage assessment is for $13/linear foot of frontage along 2100 South, Highland Drive, and 1100 East (see map). Ultimately, any lighting and signage assessment would be determined by the cost of the lighting contract chosen by the entity selected to manage the Sugar House Assessment Area. The creation of an assessment area is a lengthy and complex process that is governed by State law, has numerous noticing provisions, public hearings, and other requirements that involve a variety of City Council actions over an approximately one-year period to meet various deadlines and requirements of the “Assessment Area Act” (Utah Code Chapter 11-42). 6 Relevant Statutes and Ordinances The definition of "economic promotion activities" in the SAA statute, Utah Code Section 11-42- 102(18) is as follows: (18) "Economic promotion activities" means activities that promote economic growth in a commercial area of a local entity, including: (a) sponsoring festivals and markets. (b) promoting business investment or activities. (c) helping to coordinate public and private actions; and (d) developing and issuing publications designed to improve the economic well-being of the commercial area. If the City Council decides to proceed with the creation of a Sugar House Assessment Area, the Department of Economic Development staff can begin setting the tentative 10 to 15-month timeline to initiate a special assessment area. ATTACHMENTS: A. Tentative Proposed Timeline B. Resolution Sugar House SAA Tentative Timeline Step Action Description Group/Lead Deadlines 1 Consultant Contract Contract with a consultant to provide guidance throughout process. DED 2 Develop Assessment Methodology Primary and secondary assessment. Methodology that conforms to Assessment Area Act DED 3/24/2026 3 Technical Description of the Area Technical Description of the area provided to Engineering. Engineering prepares tax roll. Consultant 4/20/2026 4 Bond Counsel Description & Improvement Review Bond Counsel reviews the description of Improvements and Areas to be Improved. DED 4/20/2026 5 Resolution of intent to designate. Bond Counsel drafts resolution of Intent to Designate. Bond Counsel 4/28/2026 6 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification transmittal. (Mayor) Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification documentation transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 5/7/2026 7 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification transmittal. (Council Office) Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification documentation transmitted to C ouncil Office. Mayor’s Office 5/18/2026 8 City Council – Work Session DED will brief the City Council on SAA Information and the Resolution of Intent to Designate. DED 5/28/2026 9 Property Owner Letter (Notice of Intent to Designate) Prep Property Owner letter includes verbiage of preliminary estimate, rate, notice of intent to designate, common question and map finalized. DED 6/8/2026 10 Tax Roll Engineering assesses County Data & DED approves Engineering & DED 6/8/2026 11 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council adopts the Resolution of Intent to Designate the assessment area. City Council Early June 2026 12 Salt Lake County Property Tax Information. Numbers should be available by June 30, 2026. Consultant 6/30/2026 13 Post Notice of Intent to Designate Post notice of intent to designate in at least three public places within boundaries of jurisdiction. 20 – 35 days before protest hearing. DED Late June or Early July 2026 14 Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate Mail Notice of Intent to Designate, within 10 days of notice posting. DED sends via State Mail Early July 2026 15 Minutes prepared for use at protest hearing Distribute to team SAA. Bond Counsel 7/23/2026 16 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council Protest Hearing City Council Early August 2026 17 Draft Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization (BOE). Bond Counsel prepares, DED and Attorney’s Office review. Bond Counsel 8/10/2026 18 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization Transmittal (Mayor’s Office) Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalizatio n Transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 8/17/2026 19 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization (City Council). Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalizatio n Transmitted to the Council Office. Mayor’s Office 8/24/2026 20 Property Owners Written Protests Filing Deadline Property owners who are protesting the assessment area. Also, the end of 60-day written protest period. Recorder's Office Early October 2026 21 Compile Written Protests & Deliver to City Council Compilation of protests sent to City Council. Recorder's Office 10/4/2026 22 Publishing of Written Protests Publishing of Written Protests on City & State public notice website. Recorder's Office 10/5/2026 23 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council announces the protest tally and if it exceeds 40% threshold. Within 15 days after protest period ends. City Council Mid-October 2026 24 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council adopts the Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoints the Board of Equalization. City Council Mid-October 2026 25 Recording of the Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area & Notice of Proposed Assessment Record Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and Notice of Proposed Assessment with Salt Lake County Recorder, within 15 days of adoption. Recorder's Office Late October 2026 26 BOE Notice and Dates of BOE Meetings. Finalize Verbiage for BOE notice and dates of BOE meetings. Bond Counsel 10/22/2026 27 Prepare mailing for the BOE notice. Begins 2 weeks before mailing date. Engineering 11/6/2026 28 Publication of the BOE hearings. Publication and posting of time and location of the 3 consecutive meetings. Poste d in 3+ public places 20 - 35 days from the firs t BOE hearin g date. Published on the Utah Public Notice Website. Recorder's & DED 11/10/2026 29 Mailing due to Recorder’s Office for review. Due 1 week before mailing date. Engineering 11/13/2026 30 Mailing of preliminary assessmen t & notice of BOE hearings Mailing sent to each property owner and each street address. DED 11/20/2026 31 BOE hearings 9:00 am to 10:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/1/2026 32 BOE hearings 10:00 am to 11:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/2/2026 33 BOE hearings 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/3/2026 34 Finalization of BOE Hearings Finalize the report DED 12/11/2026 35 BOE Report Completion BOE report completed, signed, and forwarded to City Council and Bond Counsel. DED 12/14/2026 36 Mailing of BOE Final Report BOE report mailed to objecting property owners. Begins 15-day appeal period. Engineering 12/21/2026 37 Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel drafts Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel 12/21/2026 38 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Mayor’s Office). Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Mayor's Office. DED 1/4/2027 39 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Council Office). Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Council Office. Mayor’s Office 1/11/2027 40 Budget Submission for SAA Submit budget to SLC Finance Department. DED 1/11/2027 41 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council accepts or modifies BOE recommendations and adopts or rejects Assessment Ordinance. City Council Early Feb 2027 42 Assessment Area Management Contract drafting and Execution Execute Agreement between Salt Lake City and the vendor to manage the assessment area. DED After budget approval 43 Transfer properties into billing status. Engineering 2/20/2027 44 Publication & Posting of the Assessment Ordinance Publication of the Assessment Ordinance on the Utah Public Notice Website. Post a copy of the Assessment Ordinance in at least three public places within the jurisdiction boundaries. For at least 21 days DED/Recorder's 2/24/2027 45 Assessment Invoices and Billing Mail assessment notices and invoices to Property Owners Treasurer 3/5/2027 46 Record Notice of Assessment Interest with Salt Lake County Recorder. Utah Code 11-42-404(4)(b)(iii) requires the notice of assessment interest to “describe the property assessed by legal description and ta x identification number.” Metes and Bounds legal description provided by Recorder’s Office. (SLC) Recorder's Office 3/20/2027 47 Effective start date of the Assessment Ordinance Must be specified in the Assessment Ordinance DED 3/21/2027 48 Assessment Payments Due Invoice Payments due from property owners [15 days after effective date of Assessment Ordinance] Treasurer 4/6/2027 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Salt Lake City, Utah June___, 2026 A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, was held on __________, June ___, 2026, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at which meeting there were present and answering to roll call the following members who constituted a quorum: Alejandro Puy Chair Erika Carlsen Vice-Chair Chris Wharton Councilmember Eva Lopez Chavez Councilmember Victoria Petro Councilmember Dan Dugan Councilmember Sarah Young Councilmember Also present: Erin Mendenhall Mayor Mark Kittrell City Attorney Keith Reynolds City Recorder Absent: Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were duly had and taken: The following resolution was introduced in writing, was read by title, and Councilmember ____________ moved its adoption: 2 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 RESOLUTION NO. ___ of 2026 A Resolution of intention of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), to designate an Assessment Area for the purpose of levying assessments against properties within the Assessment Area to promote business activity and economic development in the Sugar House neighborhood of the City by assessing benefited properties within the Assessment Area for the costs of such economic promotion activities for a period of three years (the “Assessments”); and to fix a time and place for protests against the Assessment Area and its assessments, and related matters. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. The City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), hereby determines that it will be in the best interest of the City to promote economic growth activities in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City. The proposed activities are more specifically described hereafter, but generally will include, but will not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services, including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects (collectively, the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood as described hereafter and more specifically identified on maps and plans on file in the Office of the City Recorder of the City. In order to accomplish the Economic Promotion Activities, the City proposes to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. 1(the “Assessment Area”) pursuant to Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), the area of which is more particularly described in the Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area set out hereafter. Section 2. A portion of the cost of the Economic Promotion Activities shall be paid by a special assessment to be levied against business and commercial properties situated within the Assessment Area that are specially benefited by the Economic Promotion Activities. The assessment will have two components: (i)(i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) an assessment on certain properties by linear feet for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the properties within the Assessment Area and the proposed Assessment related to each property. The Assessment may be paid when assessed or, at the option of the property owner, in three (3) annual installments with interest on any delinquent installment until paid. Section 3. The Council shall hold a public hearing on [August___, 2026], at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area as set forth in the Act. Thereafter, written protests from property owners against the proposed assessments may be filed in the Office of the City Recorder of the City, whose address is 451 South State Street, Room 415, for a period of 60 days after the date of the public hearing. On ___________, [October ___, 2026] (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest period expires), at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street 3 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. The Council may thereafter adopt a resolution abandoning or creating the proposed Assessment Area depending on whether adequate protests have been filed. The City Recorder is hereby directed to give notice of intention to designate the Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) to finance and support the Economic Promotion Activities. The Notice of Intention shall specify the date of the public hearing and the time within which protests against the proposed assessments may be filed. The Notice of Intention shall be published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing. As a Class B Notice, the City Recorder shall mail a copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to each owner of property to be assessed within the Assessment Area at the last known mailing address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses of said owners appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, Utah, and, in addition, a copy of the Notice of Intention shall be mailed, postage prepaid, addressed to “Owner” at the street number of each piece of improved property to be affected by the Assessment. If a street number has not been so assigned, then the post office box, rural route number, or any other mailing address of the improved property shall be used for the mailing of the Notice of Intention. Said Notice of Intention shall be in substantially the following form: 4 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DESIGNATE ASSESSMENT AREA PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on [June ____, 2026], the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) declaring its intention to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. _____(the “Assessment Area”) to finance a portion of the cost of economic promotion activities, which are more specifically described hereafter (the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City within the Assessment Area and to levy a special assessment (the “Assessment” or “Assessments”) for a period of three years as provided in Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), on real property situated within the Assessment Area for the benefit of which such assessments are to be expended in the management and costs of the Economic Promotion Activities. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT AREA The Assessment Area is described by reference to the following streets (the “Reference Streets”): A – Ramona Avenue from 700 East to 1200 East B – 1200 East from Ramona Avenue to Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 S 1200 East C – Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East from 1200 East to Alley 12884 D – Alley 12884 from Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East to Douglas Street E – Alley 12109 from Douglas Street to Alley 13236 F -- Alley 13236 from Alley 12109 to 1300 East G – 1300 East from Alley 13236 to North right-of-way line of I-80 H – North right-of-way line of I-80 from 1300 East to 1100 East I – 1100 East from North right-of-way line of I-80 to Sugarmont Drive J – Sugarmont Drive from S McClelland Street to 900 East K – 900 East from Sugarmont Drive to Simpson Avenue L – Simpson Avenue from 900 East to 700 East M – 700 East from Simpson Avenue to Ramona Avenue The area of the Assessment Area shall include all property bounded by Reference Streets A through M described above. The Lighting/Signage Assessment (as described herein) shall apply to the following streets (collectively, the “Lighting/Signage Streets”): A – On 2100 South from 900 East to 1300 East B – On 1100 East from Ramona Avenue to 2100 South C – On Highland Drive from 2100 South to Stringham Avenue 5 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The Resolution, maps, and other information about the Assessment Area are available for examination during business hours in the offices of the Salt Lake City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah. ACTIVITIES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT AREA The “Economic Promotion Activities” shall include, but not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects. The Economic Promotion activities will take place within the boundaries of the Assessment Area for the benefit of business and commercial property owners within the Assessment Area. The City will establish a management contract through March 2030 for purposes of promotional activities for the Assessment Area, subject to the creation of the Assessment Area. ASSESSMENT RATE, FINANCIAL PLAN, AND SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Funds received from the Assessments and the estimated cost of the Economic Promotion Activities are as follows: Sources of Funds* Uses of Funds* __________________ * Figures have been rounded and may not sum due to rounding. The Assessment is proposed to be levied on benefited property within the Assessment Area to pay for a portion of the Economic Promotion Activities according to the estimated benefits to 6 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 the property from such activities. The Economic Promotion Activities will not be financed with bonds. PROPERTIES EXCLUDED FROM ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS Residential, ecclesiastical, and government-owned properties shall be excluded from Assessments unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City and the owners of such properties. Subject to the foregoing sentence, only business and commercial properties shall be assessed. [In addition, any properties having a taxable value of less than $20,000 based upon the most recent real property assessment roll of Salt Lake County shall be excluded from Assessments]. The determination of qualification for exclusion for ecclesiastical and government-owned property shall be based upon exemptions from ad valorem real property taxes for properties used by churches for non-commercial purposes and for properties owned and operated by governmental agencies. Inasmuch as the Assessment is intended to fund economic promotion activities, the City does not find any benefits for residential, ecclesiastical and/or governmental property excluded from the Assessment. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT It is proposed to levy a one-time Assessment for a three-year period on property in the Assessment Area to pay all or a portion of the estimated costs of the Economic Promotion Activities within the Assessment Area. The Assessment shall not exceed the benefits derived by the properties within the Assessment Area. There shall be two assessment components: (i)(i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii)(ii) an assessment based on linear feet (except that corner lots will not be assessed for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties with frontage on the Lighting/Signage Streets for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Assessments shall be payable in full or in three (3) annual installments (the “Assessment Installment” or “Installments”). If payable in three (3) Installments, the first Installment will fall due fifteen (15) days after the effective date of the ordinance levying the Assessment (the “Assessment Ordinance”). The total Assessment for the benefited property related to this notice is detailed in the cover letter accompanying this notice. The first Installment is currently estimated to be due on approximately [April____, 2027]. The second and third Installments will fall due on the first and second anniversary dates of the first Installment. If any Installment is not paid by the due date, the unpaid Installment(s) will accumulate delinquent interest and/or charges in accordance with the Assessment Ordinance and State law. The Assessments will be collected by directly billing property owners. The City doesn’t currently expect any adjustments to the Assessments for changes in costs associated with Economic Promotion Activities. The City will ensure that no Assessments will be collected and used for purposes other than those described in this Notice. PUBLIC HEARING 7 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The City Council shall hold a public hearing on August___, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area and all persons desiring to be heard, as set forth in the Act. TIME FOR FILING PROTESTS PROTESTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS OBJECTING TO THE ASSESSMENT AREA DESIGNATION OR OBJECTING TO BEING ASSESSED FOR THE PROPOSED ECONOMIC PROMOTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE FILED IN WRITING WITH THE CITY RECORDER OF SALT LAKE CITY EITHER IN PERSON DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY OR BY MAIL (PO BOX 145515) ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER_____, 2026. To be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area, protests or objections MUST BE IN WRITING, signed by the owners of the property proposed to be assessed. The written protest must describe or otherwise identify said property. If the aggregate taxable value of property that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate taxable value of all property within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Base Assessment, and if the linear feet frontage of the Lighting/Signage Streets (except that corner lots will not apply for both frontages as applicable, only one) that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate linear feet frontage of Lighting/Signage Streets assessed within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Lighting/Signage Assessment. Protests withdrawn prior to the expiration of the protest period and protests from areas deleted from the Assessment Area will not be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area. On Tuesday, [October____, 2026] (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest period expires), at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah, the City Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. To stay informed on the electronic means or physical location of the City Council’s hearings and meetings, please visit www.slc.gov/council/agendas. The City shall post the total and percentage of the written protests it has received on its website at least five days before such meeting. 8 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH City Recorder 9 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Councilmember __________ seconded the motion to adopt the foregoing resolution. The motion and resolution were unanimously adopted on the following recorded vote: AYE: NAY: 10 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 After the conduct of other business not pertinent to the above, the meeting was, on motion duly made and seconded, adjourned. (SEAL) By:_________________________________ Chair ATTEST: By: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___/s/ Sara Montoya___________________ Sara Montoya Senior City Attorney 11 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or disapproval on __________, 2026. By: Chair MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this __________, 2026. By: Mayor 12 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify as follows: (a) That the foregoing typewritten pages constitute a full, true, and correct copy of the record of proceedings of the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held in Salt Lake City on __________, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., insofar as said proceedings relate to the consideration and adoption of a resolution declaring the intention of the City Council to designate the Salt Lake City, Sugar House Assessment Area No. _____to provide economic promotion activities therein described as the same appears of record in my office; that I personally attended said meeting, and that the proceedings were in fact held as in said minutes specified. (b) That due, legal, and timely notice of said meeting was served upon all members as required by law and the rules and ordinances of Salt Lake City. (c) That the above resolution was provided to my office on __________, 2026, has been recorded by me, and is a part of the permanent records of Salt Lake City, Utah. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and affixed the seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 13 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING : ss. NOTICE OF INTENTION COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify that a Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) was approved and adopted in the proceedings of the City Council held on Tuesday, __________, 2026. I further certify that the Notice of Intention was published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing (__________, 2026). I further certify that on ___________, 2026, I mailed a true copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid to each owner of land to be assessed within the proposed Assessment Area at the last known address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, and in addition I mailed on the same date a copy of said Notice of Intention addressed to “Owner” addressed to the street number, post office box, rural route number, or other mailing address of each piece of improved property to be affected by the assessment. I further certify that a certified copy of said Notice of Intention, together with profiles of the improvements or economic promotion activities and a map of the proposed Assessment Area, was on file in my office for inspection by any interested parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 14 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Keith Reynolds, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City Council”) in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 524202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (“Utah Code”), I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the __________, 2026, public meeting held by the City Council (“Notice”), by causing the Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1: (i) to be posted at the anchor location for the meeting at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; (ii) to be posted to the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and (iii) to be posted on the City’s official website at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. In addition, the Notice of 2026 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be posted at least annually (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) at the anchor location for the meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this __________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 15 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 1 MEETING NOTICE 16 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 2 ANNUAL MEETING NOTICE A-1 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 EXHIBIT A This page has intentionally been left blank Sugar House SAA Tentative Timeline Step Action Description Group/Lead Deadlines 1 Consultant Contract Contract with a consultant to provide guidance throughout process. DED 2 Develop Assessment Methodology Primary and secondary assessment. Methodology that conforms to Assessment Area Act DED 3/24/2026 3 Technical Description of the Area Technical Description of the area provided to Engineering. Engineering prepares tax roll. Consultant 4/20/2026 4 Bond Counsel Description & Improvement Review Bond Counsel reviews the description of Improvements and Areas to be Improved. DED 4/20/2026 5 Resolution of intent to designate. Bond Counsel drafts resolution of Intent to Designate. Bond Counsel 4/28/2026 6 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification transmittal. (Mayor) Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification documentation transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 5/7/2026 7 Resolution of Intent to Designate and Justification transmittal. (Council Office) Resolution of Intent to Designate and justification documentation transmitted to C ouncil Office. Mayor’s Office 5/18/2026 8 City Council – Work Session DED will brief the City Council on SAA Information and the Resolution of Intent to Designate. DED 5/28/2026 9 Property Owner Letter (Notice of Intent to Designate) Prep Property Owner letter includes verbiage of preliminary estimate, rate, notice of intent to designate, common question and map finalized. DED 6/8/2026 10 Tax Roll Engineering assesses County Data & DED approves Engineering & DED 6/8/2026 11 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council adopts the Resolution of Intent to Designate the assessment area. City Council Early June 2026 12 Salt Lake County Property Tax Information. Numbers should be available by June 30, 2026. Consultant 6/30/2026 13 Post Notice of Intent to Designate Post notice of intent to designate in at least three public places within boundaries of jurisdiction. 20 – 35 days before protest hearing. DED Late June or Early July 2026 14 Mail out Notice of Intent to Designate Mail Notice of Intent to Designate, within 10 days of notice posting. DED sends via State Mail Early July 2026 15 Minutes prepared for use at protest hearing Distribute to team SAA. Bond Counsel 7/23/2026 16 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council Protest Hearing City Council Early August 2026 17 Draft Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization (BOE). Bond Counsel prepares, DED and Attorney’s Office review. Bond Counsel 8/10/2026 18 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization Transmittal (Mayor’s Office) Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalizatio n Transmitted to Mayor’s Office. DED 8/17/2026 19 Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalization (City Council). Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoint the Board of Equalizatio n Transmitted to the Council Office. Mayor’s Office 8/24/2026 20 Property Owners Written Protests Filing Deadline Property owners who are protesting the assessment area. Also, the end of 60-day written protest period. Recorder's Office Early October 2026 21 Compile Written Protests & Deliver to City Council Compilation of protests sent to City Council. Recorder's Office 10/4/2026 22 Publishing of Written Protests Publishing of Written Protests on City & State public notice website. Recorder's Office 10/5/2026 23 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council announces the protest tally and if it exceeds 40% threshold. Within 15 days after protest period ends. City Council Mid-October 2026 24 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council adopts the Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and appoints the Board of Equalization. City Council Mid-October 2026 25 Recording of the Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area & Notice of Proposed Assessment Record Resolution to Designate the Assessment Area and Notice of Proposed Assessment with Salt Lake County Recorder, within 15 days of adoption. Recorder's Office Late October 2026 26 BOE Notice and Dates of BOE Meetings. Finalize Verbiage for BOE notice and dates of BOE meetings. Bond Counsel 10/22/2026 27 Prepare mailing for the BOE notice. Begins 2 weeks before mailing date. Engineering 11/6/2026 28 Publication of the BOE hearings. Publication and posting of time and location of the 3 consecutive meetings. Poste d in 3+ public places 20 - 35 days from the firs t BOE hearin g date. Published on the Utah Public Notice Website. Recorder's & DED 11/10/2026 29 Mailing due to Recorder’s Office for review. Due 1 week before mailing date. Engineering 11/13/2026 30 Mailing of preliminary assessmen t & notice of BOE hearings Mailing sent to each property owner and each street address. DED 11/20/2026 31 BOE hearings 9:00 am to 10:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/1/2026 32 BOE hearings 10:00 am to 11:00 am (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/2/2026 33 BOE hearings 1:00 pm to 2:00 pm (public meeting). Held on consecutive days by statute. Recorder's Office 12/3/2026 34 Finalization of BOE Hearings Finalize the report DED 12/11/2026 35 BOE Report Completion BOE report completed, signed, and forwarded to City Council and Bond Counsel. DED 12/14/2026 36 Mailing of BOE Final Report BOE report mailed to objecting property owners. Begins 15-day appeal period. Engineering 12/21/2026 37 Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel drafts Assessment Ordinance Bond Counsel 12/21/2026 38 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Mayor’s Office). Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Mayor's Office. DED 1/4/2027 39 Assessment Ordinance Transmittal (Council Office). Assessment Ordinance transmitted to the Council Office. Mayor’s Office 1/11/2027 40 Budget Submission for SAA Submit budget to SLC Finance Department. DED 1/11/2027 41 City Council – Formal Meeting City Council accepts or modifies BOE recommendations and adopts or rejects Assessment Ordinance. City Council Early Feb 2027 42 Assessment Area Management Contract drafting and Execution Execute Agreement between Salt Lake City and the vendor to manage the assessment area. DED After budget approval 43 Transfer properties into billing status. Engineering 2/20/2027 44 Publication & Posting of the Assessment Ordinance Publication of the Assessment Ordinance on the Utah Public Notice Website. Post a copy of the Assessment Ordinance in at least three public places within the jurisdiction boundaries. For at least 21 days DED/Recorder's 2/24/2027 45 Assessment Invoices and Billing Mail assessment notices and invoices to Property Owners Treasurer 3/5/2027 46 Record Notice of Assessment Interest with Salt Lake County Recorder. Utah Code 11-42-404(4)(b)(iii) requires the notice of assessment interest to “describe the property assessed by legal description and ta x identification number.” Metes and Bounds legal description provided by Recorder’s Office. (SLC) Recorder's Office 3/20/2027 47 Effective start date of the Assessment Ordinance Must be specified in the Assessment Ordinance DED 3/21/2027 48 Assessment Payments Due Invoice Payments due from property owners [15 days after effective date of Assessment Ordinance] Treasurer 4/6/2027 This page has intentionally been left blank Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Salt Lake City, Utah June___, 2026 A regular meeting of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, was held on __________, June ___, 2026, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at which meeting there were present and answering to roll call the following members who constituted a quorum: Alejandro Puy Chair Erika Carlsen Vice-Chair Chris Wharton Councilmember Eva Lopez Chavez Councilmember Victoria Petro Councilmember Dan Dugan Councilmember Sarah Young Councilmember Also present: Erin Mendenhall Mayor Mark Kittrell City Attorney Keith Reynolds City Recorder Absent: Thereupon the following proceedings, among others, were duly had and taken: The following resolution was introduced in writing, was read by title, and Councilmember ____________ moved its adoption: 2 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 RESOLUTION NO. ___ of 2026 A Resolution of intention of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), to designate an Assessment Area for the purpose of levying assessments against properties within the Assessment Area to promote business activity and economic development in the Sugar House neighborhood of the City by assessing benefited properties within the Assessment Area for the costs of such economic promotion activities for a period of three years (the “Assessments”); and to fix a time and place for protests against the Assessment Area and its assessments, and related matters. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, as follows: Section 1. The City Council (the “Council”) of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), hereby determines that it will be in the best interest of the City to promote economic growth activities in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City. The proposed activities are more specifically described hereafter, but generally will include, but will not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services, including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects (collectively, the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood as described hereafter and more specifically identified on maps and plans on file in the Office of the City Recorder of the City. In order to accomplish the Economic Promotion Activities, the City proposes to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. 1(the “Assessment Area”) pursuant to Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), the area of which is more particularly described in the Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area set out hereafter. Section 2. A portion of the cost of the Economic Promotion Activities shall be paid by a special assessment to be levied against business and commercial properties situated within the Assessment Area that are specially benefited by the Economic Promotion Activities. The assessment will have two components: (i)(i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii) an assessment on certain properties by linear feet for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a list of the properties within the Assessment Area and the proposed Assessment related to each property. The Assessment may be paid when assessed or, at the option of the property owner, in three (3) annual installments with interest on any delinquent installment until paid. Section 3. The Council shall hold a public hearing on [August___, 2026], at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area as set forth in the Act. Thereafter, written protests from property owners against the proposed assessments may be filed in the Office of the City Recorder of the City, whose address is 451 South State Street, Room 415, for a period of 60 days after the date of the public hearing. On ___________, [October ___, 2026] (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest period expires), at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street 3 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. The Council may thereafter adopt a resolution abandoning or creating the proposed Assessment Area depending on whether adequate protests have been filed. The City Recorder is hereby directed to give notice of intention to designate the Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) to finance and support the Economic Promotion Activities. The Notice of Intention shall specify the date of the public hearing and the time within which protests against the proposed assessments may be filed. The Notice of Intention shall be published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing. As a Class B Notice, the City Recorder shall mail a copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to each owner of property to be assessed within the Assessment Area at the last known mailing address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses of said owners appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, Utah, and, in addition, a copy of the Notice of Intention shall be mailed, postage prepaid, addressed to “Owner” at the street number of each piece of improved property to be affected by the Assessment. If a street number has not been so assigned, then the post office box, rural route number, or any other mailing address of the improved property shall be used for the mailing of the Notice of Intention. Said Notice of Intention shall be in substantially the following form: 4 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO DESIGNATE ASSESSMENT AREA PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on [June ____, 2026], the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) declaring its intention to designate the Salt Lake City, Utah Sugar House Assessment Area No. _____(the “Assessment Area”) to finance a portion of the cost of economic promotion activities, which are more specifically described hereafter (the “Economic Promotion Activities”) in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake City within the Assessment Area and to levy a special assessment (the “Assessment” or “Assessments”) for a period of three years as provided in Title 11, Chapter 42, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), on real property situated within the Assessment Area for the benefit of which such assessments are to be expended in the management and costs of the Economic Promotion Activities. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT AREA The Assessment Area is described by reference to the following streets (the “Reference Streets”): A – Ramona Avenue from 700 East to 1200 East B – 1200 East from Ramona Avenue to Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 S 1200 East C – Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East from 1200 East to Alley 12884 D – Alley 12884 from Property Line between 1963 South 1200 East and 1979 South 1200 East to Douglas Street E – Alley 12109 from Douglas Street to Alley 13236 F -- Alley 13236 from Alley 12109 to 1300 East G – 1300 East from Alley 13236 to North right-of-way line of I-80 H – North right-of-way line of I-80 from 1300 East to 1100 East I – 1100 East from North right-of-way line of I-80 to Sugarmont Drive J – Sugarmont Drive from S McClelland Street to 900 East K – 900 East from Sugarmont Drive to Simpson Avenue L – Simpson Avenue from 900 East to 700 East M – 700 East from Simpson Avenue to Ramona Avenue The area of the Assessment Area shall include all property bounded by Reference Streets A through M described above. The Lighting/Signage Assessment (as described herein) shall apply to the following streets (collectively, the “Lighting/Signage Streets”): A – On 2100 South from 900 East to 1300 East B – On 1100 East from Ramona Avenue to 2100 South C – On Highland Drive from 2100 South to Stringham Avenue 5 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The Resolution, maps, and other information about the Assessment Area are available for examination during business hours in the offices of the Salt Lake City Recorder, 451 South State Street, Room 415, Salt Lake City, Utah. ACTIVITIES AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ASSESSMENT AREA The “Economic Promotion Activities” shall include, but not be limited to, advertising campaigns, newsletters, publications, festivals, special events, banners, branding/marketing, cultural promotion, placemaking initiatives, limited trash pickup, hospitality, wayfinding assistance, holiday lighting/signage, light maintenance, homeless services including connection to social services through the Ambassadors Program & Public Realm Services, business recruitment, district research/reporting, surveys, government coordination, housing advocacy collaboration, town meetings, strategic planning and special projects. The Economic Promotion activities will take place within the boundaries of the Assessment Area for the benefit of business and commercial property owners within the Assessment Area. The City will establish a management contract through March 2030 for purposes of promotional activities for the Assessment Area, subject to the creation of the Assessment Area. ASSESSMENT RATE, FINANCIAL PLAN, AND SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Funds received from the Assessments and the estimated cost of the Economic Promotion Activities are as follows: Sources of Funds* Uses of Funds* __________________ * Figures have been rounded and may not sum due to rounding. The Assessment is proposed to be levied on benefited property within the Assessment Area to pay for a portion of the Economic Promotion Activities according to the estimated benefits to 6 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 the property from such activities. The Economic Promotion Activities will not be financed with bonds. PROPERTIES EXCLUDED FROM ASSESSMENT AREA ASSESSMENTS Residential, ecclesiastical, and government-owned properties shall be excluded from Assessments unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the City and the owners of such properties. Subject to the foregoing sentence, only business and commercial properties shall be assessed. [In addition, any properties having a taxable value of less than $20,000 based upon the most recent real property assessment roll of Salt Lake County shall be excluded from Assessments]. The determination of qualification for exclusion for ecclesiastical and government-owned property shall be based upon exemptions from ad valorem real property taxes for properties used by churches for non-commercial purposes and for properties owned and operated by governmental agencies. Inasmuch as the Assessment is intended to fund economic promotion activities, the City does not find any benefits for residential, ecclesiastical and/or governmental property excluded from the Assessment. BASIS FOR ASSESSMENT It is proposed to levy a one-time Assessment for a three-year period on property in the Assessment Area to pay all or a portion of the estimated costs of the Economic Promotion Activities within the Assessment Area. The Assessment shall not exceed the benefits derived by the properties within the Assessment Area. There shall be two assessment components: (i)(i) an assessment based on the 2025 taxable property values (the “Base Assessment”), plus (ii)(ii) an assessment based on linear feet (except that corner lots will not be assessed for both frontages as applicable, only one) on certain properties with frontage on the Lighting/Signage Streets for special holiday lights and signage (the “Lighting/Signage Assessment” and together with the Base Assessment, the “Assessment”). PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENTS Assessments shall be payable in full or in three (3) annual installments (the “Assessment Installment” or “Installments”). If payable in three (3) Installments, the first Installment will fall due fifteen (15) days after the effective date of the ordinance levying the Assessment (the “Assessment Ordinance”). The total Assessment for the benefited property related to this notice is detailed in the cover letter accompanying this notice. The first Installment is currently estimated to be due on approximately [April____, 2027]. The second and third Installments will fall due on the first and second anniversary dates of the first Installment. If any Installment is not paid by the due date, the unpaid Installment(s) will accumulate delinquent interest and/or charges in accordance with the Assessment Ordinance and State law. The Assessments will be collected by directly billing property owners. The City doesn’t currently expect any adjustments to the Assessments for changes in costs associated with Economic Promotion Activities. The City will ensure that no Assessments will be collected and used for purposes other than those described in this Notice. PUBLIC HEARING 7 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 The City Council shall hold a public hearing on August___, 2026 at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah to hear all objections related to the Assessment Area and all persons desiring to be heard, as set forth in the Act. TIME FOR FILING PROTESTS PROTESTS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS OBJECTING TO THE ASSESSMENT AREA DESIGNATION OR OBJECTING TO BEING ASSESSED FOR THE PROPOSED ECONOMIC PROMOTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE FILED IN WRITING WITH THE CITY RECORDER OF SALT LAKE CITY EITHER IN PERSON DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY OR BY MAIL (PO BOX 145515) ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER_____, 2026. To be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area, protests or objections MUST BE IN WRITING, signed by the owners of the property proposed to be assessed. The written protest must describe or otherwise identify said property. If the aggregate taxable value of property that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate taxable value of all property within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Base Assessment, and if the linear feet frontage of the Lighting/Signage Streets (except that corner lots will not apply for both frontages as applicable, only one) that is the subject of timely filed written protests represents at least 40% of the aggregate linear feet frontage of Lighting/Signage Streets assessed within the Assessment Area, the City Council will not impose the Lighting/Signage Assessment. Protests withdrawn prior to the expiration of the protest period and protests from areas deleted from the Assessment Area will not be counted against the creation of the Assessment Area. On Tuesday, [October____, 2026] (such date being within 15 days after the date the protest period expires), at 7:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers at 451 South State Street in Salt Lake City, Utah, the City Council shall count the written protests filed and calculate whether adequate protests have been filed and hold a public meeting to announce the protest tally and whether adequate protests have been filed. To stay informed on the electronic means or physical location of the City Council’s hearings and meetings, please visit www.slc.gov/council/agendas. The City shall post the total and percentage of the written protests it has received on its website at least five days before such meeting. 8 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH City Recorder 9 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 Councilmember __________ seconded the motion to adopt the foregoing resolution. The motion and resolution were unanimously adopted on the following recorded vote: AYE: NAY: 10 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 After the conduct of other business not pertinent to the above, the meeting was, on motion duly made and seconded, adjourned. (SEAL) By:_________________________________ Chair ATTEST: By: City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___/s/ Sara Montoya___________________ Sara Montoya Senior City Attorney 11 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 PRESENTATION TO THE MAYOR The foregoing resolution was presented to the Mayor for her approval or disapproval on __________, 2026. By: Chair MAYOR’S APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL The foregoing resolution is hereby approved on this __________, 2026. By: Mayor 12 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah, do hereby certify as follows: (a) That the foregoing typewritten pages constitute a full, true, and correct copy of the record of proceedings of the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held in Salt Lake City on __________, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., insofar as said proceedings relate to the consideration and adoption of a resolution declaring the intention of the City Council to designate the Salt Lake City, Sugar House Assessment Area No. _____to provide economic promotion activities therein described as the same appears of record in my office; that I personally attended said meeting, and that the proceedings were in fact held as in said minutes specified. (b) That due, legal, and timely notice of said meeting was served upon all members as required by law and the rules and ordinances of Salt Lake City. (c) That the above resolution was provided to my office on __________, 2026, has been recorded by me, and is a part of the permanent records of Salt Lake City, Utah. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and affixed the seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 13 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING : ss. NOTICE OF INTENTION COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) I, Keith Reynolds, the duly chosen, qualified, and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify that a Notice of Intention to Designate Assessment Area (the “Notice of Intention”) was approved and adopted in the proceedings of the City Council held on Tuesday, __________, 2026. I further certify that the Notice of Intention was published as a Class B Notice under Section 63G-30-102, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, for at least 20 days but not more than 35 days before the date of the public hearing (__________, 2026). I further certify that on ___________, 2026, I mailed a true copy of the Notice of Intention by United States Mail, postage prepaid to each owner of land to be assessed within the proposed Assessment Area at the last known address of such owner, using for such purpose the names and addresses appearing on the last completed real property assessment rolls of Salt Lake County, and in addition I mailed on the same date a copy of said Notice of Intention addressed to “Owner” addressed to the street number, post office box, rural route number, or other mailing address of each piece of improved property to be affected by the assessment. I further certify that a certified copy of said Notice of Intention, together with profiles of the improvements or economic promotion activities and a map of the proposed Assessment Area, was on file in my office for inspection by any interested parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the corporate seal of Salt Lake City, Utah, this ___________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 14 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW I, Keith Reynolds, the undersigned City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah (the “City Council”) in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 524202, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (“Utah Code”), I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the __________, 2026, public meeting held by the City Council (“Notice”), by causing the Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1: (i) to be posted at the anchor location for the meeting at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting; (ii) to be posted to the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and (iii) to be posted on the City’s official website at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting. In addition, the Notice of 2026 Annual Meeting Schedule for the City Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the City Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be posted at least annually (a) on the Utah Public Notice Website, (b) on the City’s official website, and (c) at the anchor location for the meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this __________, 2026. (SEAL) By: City Recorder 15 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 1 MEETING NOTICE 16 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 SCHEDULE 2 ANNUAL MEETING NOTICE A-1 Notice of Intent Resolution 4919-0691-1907, v. 2 EXHIBIT A This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 05/06/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/08/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Barlow, Aaron E-mail aaron.barlow@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 05/08/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 05/08/2026 Subject: Alley Vacation at Approximately 567 E Warnock Ave Additional Staff Contact: Krissy Gilmore, kristina.gilmore@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Aaron Barlow, aaron.barlow@slc.govKrissy Gilmore, kristina.gilmore@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Positive recomendation frmo the Planning Commission (5-1) Background/Discussion See ﬁrst attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Provide your perspective on the value of recommending a public hearing The request is to vacate (give up ownership of) a public right-of-way. While the alley in question is essentially unusable, it is still public property, and the public needs a chance to weigh in on the process. Public Process • Early Notiﬁcationo December 16, 2025 – The Sugar House Community Council and the Sugar House Chamber of Commerce were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations.o December 16, 2025 – Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the alley were provided with early noti ﬁcation of the proposal.o December 30, 2025 – A public Open House with information about the Alley Vacation was posted on the City’s webpage. o January 28, 2026 – Public Hearing Notice signs were posted on the property.o January 28, 2026 – Public hearing notices were mailed by the Planning Division.o January 28, 2026 – Public hearing notices were posted on the City and State websites, and posted on the Planning Division list serve.• Planning Commission Meetingo February 11, 2026 – The Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the alley and held a public hearing regarding the matter. The hearing can be viewed here beginning at 2:25:21. There were no public comments at the meeting. The Commission voted 5 to 1 in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval. This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Jill Genessy, on behalf of property owner Gray Willow, LLC, has submitted a petition for an alley vacation (PLNPCM2025-1099). The alley runs north-south from Warnock Avenue to the I-80 right-of-way, situated between 567 E Warnock Avenue (owned by the applicant) and 2434 S 600 E. It is roughly 16.5 feet wide and 80 feet long, currently occupied by power poles for both properties and lines crossing to the other side of Interstate 80. If approved, the alley would be divided in half and allocated to the neighboring property owners in accordance with Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City-Owned Public Way. To approve an alley vacation, at least 75% of the abutting property owners must give signed consent; both property owners have consented to this request. The property at 567 E Warnock Avenue is currently vacant. On the property to the east of the alley (2434 S 600 E), there is a single-family house. The subject alley was originally platted in 1909 as part of Hansen’s Addition to Forest Dale. During that time, alleys were commonly included in new subdivisions to cut through blocks and provide rear access to lots. However, because of the construction of I-80, the alley no longer serves its original purpose. It functioned as the de facto driveway for the house that previously stood at 567 E Warnock Avenue. Today, only the two properties and the subject alley are all that remain on this block of Hansen’s Addition to Forest Dale. The subject alley, highlighted in red, sits between two properties on Warnock Avenue. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification o December 16, 2025 – The Sugar House Community Council and the Sugar House Chamber of Commerce were sent the 45-day required notice for recognized community organizations. o December 16, 2025 – Property owners and tenants within 300 feet of the alley were provided with early notification of the proposal. o December 30, 2025 – A public Open House with information about the Alley Vacation was posted on the City’s webpage. o January 28, 2026 – Public Hearing Notice signs were posted on the property. o January 28, 2026 – Public hearing notices were mailed by the Planning Division. o January 28, 2026 – Public hearing notices were posted on the City and State websites, and posted on the Planning Division list serve. • Planning Commission Meeting o February 11, 2026 – The Planning Commission reviewed the request to vacate the alley and held a public hearing regarding the matter. The hearing can be viewed here beginning at 2:25:21. There were no public comments at the meeting. The Commission voted 5 to 1 in favor of forwarding a recommendation of approval. Planning Commission (PC) Records 1) Planning Commission Agenda of February 11, 2026 (Click to Access) 2) PC Minutes of February 11, 2026 (Click to Access) 3) Planning Commission Staff Report of February 11, 2026 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing 4) Original Petition 5) Mailing List This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. ________ of 2026 (Vacating a city-owned alley lying between properties located at approximately 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2434 South 600 East) An ordinance vacating an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to certain property located at approximately 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2434 South 600 East, and running between Warnock Avenue and the Interstate 80 right of way, pursuant to Petition No. PLNPCM2025- 01099. WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Planning Commission (“Planning Commission”) held a public hearing on February 11, 2026, to consider a request made by Jill Genessy on behalf of Gray Willow, LLC to vacate an unnamed city-owned alley adjacent to the properties located at 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2434 South 600 East, and WHEREAS, at its February 11, 2026, meeting the Planning Commission voted in favor of forwarding a positive recommendation on said petition to the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”); and WHEREAS, the City Council finds after holding a public hearing on this matter that there is good cause for the vacation of the alley and neither the public interest nor any person will be materially injured by the proposed vacation. NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Closing and Vacating City-Owned Alley. That an unnamed, city-owned alley, which is more particularly described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto, hereby is vacated and declared not presently necessary or available for public use. SECTION 2. Reservations and Disclaimers. The above vacation is expressly made subject to all existing rights-of-way and easements of all public utilities of any and every description now located on and under or over the confines of this alley, and also subject to the rights of entry thereon for the purposes of maintaining, altering, repairing, removing or rerouting said utilities, including the city’s water and sewer facilities. Said vacation is also subject to any existing rights-of-way or easements of private third parties. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah this ____ day of _________, 2026. ______________________________ Alejandro Puy, Council Chair  ATTEST: ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder Transmitted to Mayor on _______________________. Mayor's Action: _______Approved. _______Vetoed. ______________________________ Erin Mendenhall, Mayor ______________________________ Keith Reynolds, City Recorder (SEAL) Bill No. ________ of 2026 Published: ______________. Ordinance Vacating Alley Near 567 E Warnock Ave APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date:___April 28, 2026___________________ By: ___________________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Blake Thomas Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2025-01099 November 10, 2025 Petition for the Alley Vacation received by the Salt Lake City Planning Division. December 3, 2025 Petition assigned to Aaron Barlow, Senior Planner. December 16, 2025 Information about the proposal was sent to the Sugar House Community Council in order to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. December 16, 2025 Staff sent an early notification announcement of the project to all residents and property owners living within 300 feet of the project site providing information about the proposal and how to give public input on the project. Dec 2025 – Feb 2026 Staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. January 28, 2026 Public hearing notice sign with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing physically posted on the property. Public notice posted on City and State websites and sent via the Planning list serve for the Planning Commission meeting on April 10, 2024. Public hearing notice mailed. February 11, 2026 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 11, 2026. By a vote of 5-1, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council on the proposed zoning map amendment. February 22, 2026 Staff requested a legal description of the alley for the draft ordinance March 24, 2026 Applicant provided legal description of the alley. March 24, 2026 Staff forwarded draft ordinance to Attorney’s Office. April 28, 2026 Draft Ordinance Approved by Attorney’s Office This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2025-01099 – Alley Vacation at Approximately 567 E Warnock Ave – Jill Genessy, on behalf of property owner Gray Willow, LLC, has submitted a petition for an alley vacation. The alley runs north-south from Warnock Avenue to the I-80 right- of-way, situated between 567 E Warnock Avenue (owned by the applicant) and 2434 S 600 E. It is roughly 16.5 feet wide and 80 feet long, currently occupied by power poles for both properties and lines crossing to the other side of Interstate 80. If approved, the alley would be divided in half and allocated to the neighboring property owners in accordance with Chapter 14.52: Disposition of City-Owned Public Way. The subject property is located within Council District 7, represented by Sarah Young. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During the hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The Council may consider adopting the ordinance the same night of the public hearing. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means, while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including Zoom connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-hour comment line at (801) 535-7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slc.gov. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions about this proposal or want to review the file, please call Aaron Barlow at 801- 535-6182 or 801-872-8389 between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or email him at aaron.barlow@slc.gov. The application details are available at www.slcpermits.com by selecting the “Planning” tab and entering the petition number PLNPCM2025-01099. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities can request reasonable accommodations, including alternative formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days ahead of time. To request assistance, contact the City Council Office at https://aca-prod.accela.com/SLCREFcouncil.comments@slc.gov, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank 4. ORIGINAL PETITION October 29, 2025 Salt Lake City Planning Division Attn: Planning Director 451 South State, Room 406 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Subject: Request for Alley Vacation – Between 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2435 South 600 East. ______________________________________________________________________________________ Dear Planning Director, Gray Willow, LLC respectfully submits this request for the vacation of the unused alley located between 567 East Warnock Avenue and 2435 South 600 East in Salt Lake City. The request is based on the following considerations: A. Lack of Public Use The alley terminates at the embankment of Interstate 80, eliminating through access and rendering it no longer functional for public use. B. Public Safety Concerns The area has become a gathering place for unsheltered individuals, resulting in debris accumulation and the presence of hazardous materials such as used needles. This poses a serious safety concern for nearby residents, particularly families within the adjacent townhome development. C. Neighborhood Blight The alley is not maintained by Salt Lake City or UDOT, contributing to its deterioration and creating visual blight that negatively affects the surrounding community. D. Community Benefit If vacated, Gray Willow, LLC intends to incorporate the area into the existing townhome development which will provide a gathering place for the residents. This improvement will enhance the overall appearance, safety, and livability of the neighborhood. We appreciate the Planning Division’s consideration of this request and would welcome the opportunity to provide additional information or meet with staff to discuss the proposal further. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience at 801-577-8536 or Jill@altusdg.com. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Jill Genessy Asset Manager Gray Willow, LLC 1586 East Stratford Avenue, Suite 4 Salt Lake City, UT 84106 jill@altusdg.com Alley Vacation Parcel Map 567 E Warnock Avenue – applicant ’s property 2435 South 600 East – Danielle R Flemming (Supports the Petition) This page has intentionally been left blank 5. MAILING LIST FIRST NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP TIMOTHEA J BRENNAN 980 E HOLLYWOOD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84105 SCOTT SEEDALL (JT); LAURALLE SEEDALL (JT)1192 S 52ND EAST IDAHO FALLS ID 83401 TLT SIMMONS PROPERTIES, LLC 7405 S FOX TAIL BAY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 STATE ROAD COMMISSION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 KURT EADES (JT); AMANDA EADES (JT)562 E DRIGGS AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 ABBEY M HARPER (JT); STEVEN S HARPER (JT)572 E DRIGGS AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 DAVID L KING (JT); CARRIE E KIRKPATRICK (JT)574 E DRIGGS AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 STATE ROAD COMMISSION OF UTAH; SARAH L H HARDY PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 JEREMY C SIMMONS 560 E DRIGGS AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 JEREMY C SIMMONS 7405 S FOX TAIL BAY WEST JORDAN UT 84084 UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 148420 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 DANIELLE R FLEMING 2434 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MORGAN SCHILD (JT); EMERSON SMITH (JT)529 E DIVISION LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MARK & PATRICIA BEEKHUIZEN LIVING TRUST 07/22/2022 535 E DIVISION LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MARK & PATRICIA BEEKHUIZEN LIVING TRUST 07/22/2022 535 E DIVISION LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 WOODLAND COMMONS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1586 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 GRAY WILLOW, LLC 1586 E STRATFORD AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 SALT LAKE CITY CORP.PO BOX 145460 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114 DAVID C TUCKER 549 E DIVISION LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 RUSSELL C BANCROFT 557 E DIVISION LN SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 CORP OF PB OF CH JC OF LDS 50 E NORTH TEMPLE #2225 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 MAKAYLA LOE 2437 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 OLIVER HUGHES 2445 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 MATTHEW J BARILA 2451 S 600 E SALT LAKE CITY UT 84106 VIRGINIA TOBACCO FARMER, LLC 3765 E LOIS LN MILLCREEK UT 84124 AARON BARLOW 1191 N 1500 W SALT LAKE CITY UT 84116 Current Occupant 550 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 552 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 560 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 560 E DRIGGS AVE, EAST Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 570 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 554 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 558 E DRIGGS AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 567 E WARNOCK AVE Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 543 E DIVISION LN Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2435 S 500 E Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 529 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit A Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 529 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit B Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 529 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit C Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 529 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit D Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 539 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit A Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 539 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit B Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 539 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit C Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 539 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit D Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 549 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit A Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 549 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit B Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 549 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit C Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 549 E WARNOCK AVE, Unit D Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 531 E DIVISION LN Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2450 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2429 S 600 E Salt Lake City UT 84106 Current Occupant 2430 S 700 E Salt Lake City UT 84106 This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY TRANSMITTAL To: Salt Lake City Council Chair Submission Date: 04/28/2026 Date Sent to Council: 05/07/2026 From: Department * Community and Neighborhood Employee Name: Seth Rios E-mail Seth.Rios@slc.gov Department Director Signature Director Signed Date 05/07/2026 Chief Administrator Officer's Signature Chief Administrator Officer's Signed Date 05/07/2026 Subject: Mobile Business Text Amendment Additional Staff Contact: Seth Rios - seth.rios@slc.gov Presenters/Staff Table Seth Rios - seth.rios@slc.gov Document Type Ordinance Budget Impact? Yes No Recommendation: Approve Background/Discussion See ﬁrst attachment for Background/Discussion Public Hearing Is there a City or State statutory requirement to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No The City Council reserves the option to hold and notice for a public hearing pursuant to their practices for public engagement. Does the City have a general practice to hold a public hearing for this item?* Yes No Public Process This page has intentionally been left blank ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: On November 15, 2023, Mayor Erin Mendenhall initiated a petition to amend Title 21A regulations regarding mobile businesses. These amendments apply only to mobile businesses operating on private property. The proposed text amendment addresses legislative changes in state law that limit the types of regulations cities can impose on mobile businesses. The intent of the amendment is to bring the City’s mobile business code into compliance with these new state regulations. The proposed text amendment will combine the “mobile food business”, “mobile food court”, “mobile food trailer”, “mobile food truck”, and “vending cart” definitions into a single “mobile business” definition. This approach aligns with the definitions found in state code. The proposed amendments would update the land use tables to reflect the change. Mobile business will continue to be allowed in the same zones where they are currently permitted. Under the new state law, mobile businesses are allowed to operate under a single business license from one municipality. If a mobile business obtains a business license in another city, Salt Lake City must recognize it as valid and cannot require additional business licenses or fees. Section 21A.36.160 of the zoning ordinance is amended to remove the requirement for multiple business licenses, in compliance with state code. State code now prevents cities from prohibiting mobile businesses within a given distance of a restaurant. The proposed amendment removes this language to comply with the state code. Additionally, Section 21A.36.160 of the zoning ordinance is amended to remove design standards already required by the County Health Department. Removing these standards simplifies requirements for mobile businesses and avoids redundancy between jurisdictions. PUBLIC PROCESS: • Early Notification: Notification of the proposal was sent to all recognized community organizations (RCOs) on November 20, 2023. • City Open House: A virtual open house for the proposal was hosted on the City’s website from November 20, 2023, to April 24, 2024. • Meetings with the Business Advisory Board: The text amendment was presented to the Business Advisory Board on April 10, 2024, and May 8, 2024. • Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed text amendment on June 12, 2024. Following Planning staff’s recommendation, the commission voted to recommend that the City Council approve the request with a vote of 6-0. Planning Commission (PC) Records a) PC Agenda of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access) b) PC Minutes of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access) c) Planning Commission Staff Report of June 12, 2024 (Click to Access Report) EXHIBITS: 1) Ordinance 2) Project Chronology 3) Notice of City Council Public Hearing This page has intentionally been left blank 1. ORDINANCE 1 Project Title: Mobile Business Amendments Petition No: PLNPCM2023-00938 Version: Transmitted Date Prepared: 4/7/26 Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval 6/12/2024 The proposed ordinance makes the following amendments (for summary purposes only):  Amends Title 21A to comply with legislative changes to Utah State Code Section 11-56 regarding mobile businesses  Deletes the words “mobile food business, mobile food courts, and vending carts” and replaces them with the words “mobile business.”  Amends Section 21A.36.160 to allow mobile businesses in zones that permit the “restaurant” land use.  Deletes Section 21A.36.161 because mobile food courts are now defined as a “mobile business” and are therefore regulated by Chapter 21A.36.160.  Amends Chapter 21A.62.040 to consolidate the “mobile food business, mobile food court, mobile food trailer, mobile food truck, and vending cart” definitions into one “mobile business” definition. Underlined text is new; text with a strikethrough is proposed to be deleted. The highlighted text reflects recent direction provided by the City Council at a Work Session. All other text is existing with no proposed change. 1 1. Amends Section 21A.33.040 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Manufacturing Districts only 2 as to the following four uses, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 3 4 Use Permitted and Conditional Uses By District M-1 M-2 M-1A Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P P P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P P P Mobile food court P P P APPROVED AS TO FORM Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office Date: ____April 20, 2026___________ By: ____________________________ Katherine D. Pasker, Senior City Attorney 2 Vending cart, private property P P P 5 6 2. Amends Section 21A.33.050 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Downtown Districts only as 7 to the following five uses, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 8 9 10 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 Mobile food business (operation in the public P P P P Mobile food business (operation on private P P P P Mobile food court P P P P Vending cart, private P P P P Vending cart, public 11 12 3. Amends Section 21A.33.060 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses in the Gateway District only as 13 to the following five uses, with no other changes to the table, as follows: 14 15 Use G-MU Mobile food business (operation in the public right-of-way) P Mobile food business (operation on private property) P Mobile food court P Vending cart, private property P Vending cart, public property P 16 17 4. Amends Section 21A.33.070 Table of Permitted and Conditional Uses for Special Purpose Districts 18 only as to the following two uses, with no other changes to the table, as follows:19 3 20 Use Permitted And Conditional Uses By District RP BP FP AG AG- 2 AG- 5 AG- 20 OS NOS A PL PL- 2 I UI MH EI Vending cart, P P Vending cart, public P 21 4 22 5. Amends Section 21A.36.160 as follows: 23 24 21A.36.160: MOBILE BUSINESSES: 25 26 A. Mobile Food Business Allowed: A mobile business is permitted as indicated in this Section. 27 28 1. Public Rights of Way: Mobile businesses located in a right of way shall comply with Title 5, 29 Chapters 5.65 and 5.69. Persons selling food or beverages from mobile food businesses may do 30 so by use of private property only, unless otherwise permitted under title 5, chapter 5.69 of this 31 Code. Use of private property by mobile food businesses shall be arranged with the real property 32 owner and proof of such property owner authorization shall be required prior to the issuance of a 33 business license. 34 35 2. Private Property: Mobile food businesses shall be permitted on private property when: are 36 allowed only within the SNB, CN, CB, CS, CC, CSHBD, CG, TSA, M-1, M-2, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-37 4, G-MU, RP, BP, UI, MH, MU, R-MU, R-MU-35, and R-MU-45 Zones, in accordance with the 38 provisions of this section 39 a. the use is listed as permitted in the land use tables found in 21A.33. 40 b. the property is located on government-owned property and the government entity has 41 authorized the mobile business to operate on the property. 42 c. the mobile business is associated with a special event or temporary use located in any 43 zoning district and is less than 12 hours in duration. 44 d. the mobile business is associated with a public event located in any zoning district that has 45 been authorized by the city, including when the private property is within ¼ mile of a public 46 event held on a public right of way. 47 48 3. Provisions found in this section shall not apply to vending carts, mobile ice cream vendors, 49 seasonal farm stands and other temporary merchants or uses that are specifically authorized by 50 this title or other City ordinances. 51 52 4. Limitations on vending carts: Nonmotorized mobile pushcarts may only prepare and sell food, 53 beverages, or similar items. 54 55 B. Business License Aand Fees Required: No mobile food business shall continue in operation 56 unless the holder thereof has paid an annual business regulatory fee and has met all applicable 57 requirements as set forth in section 5.04.070 of this Code, or its successor section for each mobile 58 food business. A business license is required for the operation of a mobile business as set forth in 59 Title 5, Chapters 5.65 and 5.69. 60 61 C. Separate Applications: Separate business license applications may be required for each mobile 62 food business. Separate business license fees shall be required for each mobile food business vehicle 63 operating under one business license. 64 65 D. Business Activity Tto Bbe Temporary: All business activity related to mobile food businesses 66 shall be of a temporary nature subject to the requirements below: 67 68 1. A mobile food truck business may not park in one individual location for the purpose of 69 conducting business for more than twelve (12) hours during any twenty four (24) hour period. 70 71 2. The mobile food truck shall be occupied by the owner or operator thereof at all times. 72 73 3. No overnight parking is allowed. 74 75 5 D. E. Location Aand Placement Requirements: The business operating location must be on private 76 property, on City streets as defined in title 5, chapter 5.69 of this Code, within the specified zones, or 77 as otherwise authorized by applicable City ordinance, subject to the requirements below: A mobile 78 business shall: 79 80 1. Only access a property using driveways and park on surfaces that comply with the standards 81 for surfacing in the Off Street Parking Standards Manual; Parking on a park strip, or otherwise 82 landscaped area is not allowed. 83 84 2. Park in legally established parking areas or areas that allow vehicular staging. Parking shall not 85 be allowed when blocking traffic, such as on a sidewalk, driveway, trail, or other pedestrian way 86 open to the public, and when creating a dangerous situation, including within a sight distance 87 triangle, a fire zone, or near a fire hydrant. Exceptions to this provision may be approved as part 88 of a special event permit authorized by the city; and A mobile food business shall park on a hard 89 surface. Alternatives to asphalt and cement may be approved by the transportation engineer if the 90 applicant is able to demonstrate that the alternative will not result in the accumulation of debris 91 on the City right-of-way. 92 93 3. Not obstruct pedestrian, bicycle, or vehicle access to any land use, including properties that 94 contain multiple land uses or businesses. Mobile food business vehicles must be parked so that 95 neither the vehicle nor the customers block driveways of existing buildings or uses, or in such a 96 manner as to create a traffic hazard. 97 98 4. No mobile food business shall occupy required parking stalls of the primary use. 99 100 5. No mobile food business shall interfere with the internal parking lot circulation. 101 102 6. Mobile food businesses shall not use the public right-of-way unless otherwise allowed by 103 ordinance. 104 105 7. Any auxiliary power required for the operation of the mobile food truck shall be self-106 contained. No use of public or private power sources are allowed without providing written 107 consent from the owner. 108 109 E. 8. Unless licensed prior to January 1, 2013, aA parked mobile food business shall conform to all 110 requirements in the Salt Lake City vehicle idling ordinances (tTitle 12, cChapter 12.58 of this Code). 111 112 F. 9. All materials generated from a mobile food business that are to be disposed of should shall be 113 disposed of properly. It is illegal to discharge or dispose of any substance, material, food, or waste 114 into the storm drain system. (Sections 17.84.100, prohibition of discharge into storm drain system; 115 17.36.220, prohibition against opening manhole covers, of this Code.) 116 117 G. 10. Mobile food businesses shall comply with all other applicable City ordinances. 118 Provisions found in this section shall not apply to downtown vendors, vending carts, mobile ice 119 cream vendors, seasonal farm stands and other temporary merchants or uses that are specifically 120 authorized by this title or other City ordinances. 121 122 H. F. Design Aand Operation Guidelines: Mobile food trucks operating in the public right-of-way 123 shall comply with the following design requirements: 124 125 1. Mobile food truck vehicles businesses that include the handling and distribution of food shall 126 obtain approval from the Salt Lake Valley Health Department. shall be designed to meet all 127 applicable Salt Lake Valley Health Department requirements relating to the handling and 128 distribution of food. 129 130 6 2. The mobile food truck business shall not have a drive-through. 131 132 3. Mobile food truck vVehicles shall be kept in good operating condition, no peeling paint or 133 rust shall be visible. 134 135 4. No mobile food truck vehicle operating in the public right-of- way shall operate within the 136 same block face as another mobile food vendor at any one time. 137 138 5. No mobile food truck vehicle shall operate within one hundred feet (100') on the same linear 139 block face of a door to a restaurant, mobile food vendor, food cart, or City authorized special 140 event selling food, except: 141 142 a. The above requirement may be waived if the application is submitted with the written 143 consent of the proprietor of such restaurant or shop. The consent shall be on forms deemed 144 appropriate by the Business License Administrator. Such waiver shall not exempt the 145 applicant from compliance with the other location and distance restrictions of this section. 146 147 4 6. All grounds utilized by a mobile food business shall at all times be maintained in a clean 148 and attractive condition at all times. 149 150 5. 7. Trash and recycling containers shall be provided for the use of the business patrons. 151 152 8. Mobile food businesses shall source local products when available. 153 154 9. Any enclosures or canopy extensions must be integrated into the design of the mobile food 155 business vehicle and must not project onto the public sidewalk or any other part of the public 156 right-of-way not authorized by the Transportation Division. 157 158 I G. Signs: No signs shall be used to advertise the conduct of a mobile food business at the premises 159 other than that which is physically attached to the self-contained business, except temporary signs 160 authorized by Ssection 21A.46.055 of this title. 161 162 H. Professional And Personal Services Prohibited: The performance of professional or personal 163 services for sale shall not be provided from a mobile food business. 164 165 I. Approved Kitchen: If the mobile food business includes an area for food preparation and/or sale, it 166 must be approved by the Salt Lake Valley Health Department. 167 168 J. Multiple Mobile Businesses on a Property: Multiple mobile businesses may be located on the same 169 property and at the same time. 170 171 172 6. Section 21A.36.161 is hereby repealed in its entirety: 173 174 21A.36.161: MOBILE FOOD COURTS: 175 A. Mobile Food Courts A Conditional Use: 176 1. Operating a mobile food court is unlawful without first obtaining conditional use approval subject 177 to the qualifying provisions written below as well as those in chapter 21A.54 of this title. 178 2. Mobile food courts are allowed by administrative conditional use approval only within the M-1, 179 M-2, D-1, D-2, D-3, D-4, G-MU, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. 180 3. Provisions found in this section shall apply to mobile food businesses, vending carts, and seasonal 181 farm stands that are specifically authorized by this title or other City ordinances. 182 B. Qualifying Provisions: 183 1. A mobile food court is required to be on a parcel of at least two thousand (2,000) square feet in 184 size. 185 7 2. No less than two (2) and no more than ten (10) individual mobile food businesses or other 186 authorized vendors are allowed on a parcel. 187 3. No participating mobile food business or other authorized vendor shall continue in operation at the 188 mobile food court unless the holder thereof has paid an annual business regulatory fee as set forth in 189 section 5.04.070 of this Code, or its successor section. 190 4. All requirements of chapter 21A.48, "Landscaping And Buffers", of this title and section 191 21A.36.020, "Conformance With Lot And Bulk Controls", of this chapter, or their successor chapter or 192 section shall be met prior to the issuance of a permit. 193 5. Mobile food courts are for the sale of food products only. Retail sale of nonfood items is not 194 permitted. 195 6. A master sign plan for the mobile food court shall be submitted for review and approval as part of 196 the conditional use process. The plan shall provide information relating to permanent signs for the court, 197 as well as individual signs for each business. 198 7. All the proposed activities will be conducted on private property owned or otherwise controlled by 199 the applicant and none of the activities will occur on any public right-of-way. 200 8. The proposed mobile food court will not impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic in the public way. 201 9. The proposed mobile food court complies with all conditions pertaining to any existing variances, 202 conditional uses or other approvals granted for the property. 203 10. All activities associated with a mobile food court must comply with all Salt Lake Valley Health 204 Department requirements. 205 11. A detailed site plan demonstrating the following is required: 206 a. The location and orientation of each vendor pad. 207 b. The location of any paving, trash enclosures, landscaping, planters, fencing, canopies, umbrellas 208 or other table covers, barriers or any other site requirement by the International Building Code, or Health 209 Department. 210 c. The location of all existing and proposed activities on site. 211 d. The circulation of all pedestrian and vehicle traffic on the site. 212 e. The mobile food court shall not occupy required parking stalls of any primary use of the site. 213 12. Live music will not be performed nor loudspeakers played in the mobile food court area unless 214 the decibel level is within conformance with the Salt Lake City noise control ordinance, title 9, chapter 215 9.28 of this Code. 216 13. Hard surface paving at the vehicular entrance to the mobile food court, and for each individual 217 mobile food business is required. Alternatives to asphalt and cement may be approved as part of the 218 conditional use process if the applicant is able to demonstrate that the alternative will not result in the 219 accumulation of mud or debris on the city right-of-way. 220 221 222 7. Amends Section 21A.42.020 as follows: 223 224 21A.42.020: APPLICABILITY: 225 226 This chapter regulates temporary uses not otherwise regulated by tTitle 3, cChapter 3.50 of this 227 Code. Mobile businesses Food trucks and trailers are subject to cChapter 21A.36 of this title if on private 228 property or tTitle 5, chapter 5.69 of this Code if on public property. Art festivals, neighborhood fairs and 229 other similar activities, authorized by other City regulations to operate on public property or within the 230 public way, are not subject to the provisions of this chapter. 231 232 233 8. Amends Subsection 21A.42.060.A as follows: 234 235 A. Application: An application shall be submitted to the Zzoning Aadministrator. Every application 236 for a temporary use permit shall include a site plan and a traffic plan listing the date, time, location, 237 anticipated attendance, anticipated access routes, ingress and egress for emergency vehicles, and available 238 parking in the vicinity. The application shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator at least thirty (30) 239 calendar days before the scheduled date that the temporary event or use is to take place unless the 240 8 Zzoning Aadministrator approves a shorter application deadline. The application shall include: 241 1. A site plan; 242 2. A traffic plan listing the date, time, location, anticipated attendance, anticipated access routes, 243 ingress and egress for emergency vehicles, and available parking in the vicinity; and 244 3. A plan for cleaning and associated wastewater disposal showing that all materials generated 245 from the temporary use are properly disposed, in accordance with Title 17 of this code. 246 247 248 9. Amends Subsection 21A.42.080.D as follows: 249 250 D. Temporary Food Service Aand Oother Small Scale Temporary Uses: Temporary food service and 251 other small scale temporary uses are permitted for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) days each 252 calendar year. Such facilities shall be less than two hundred (200) square feet and shall not interfere with 253 pedestrian access to other businesses on the site. Food trucks and trailers Mobile businesses are subject 254 to cChapter 21A.36 of this title if on private property or tTitle 5, cChapter 5.69 of this Code if on public 255 property. 256 257 258 10. Amends Section 21A.62.040, only as to the following five definitions, as follows: 259 260 a. MOBILE FOOD BUSINESS: A business that serves food or beverages from a self-contained unit 261 maintains ongoing mobility and is either motorized, or in a trailer on wheels, or a cart pushed by a vendor, 262 and conducts all or part of its operations on premises other than its own and is readily movable, without 263 disassembling, for transport to another location. The term "mobile food business" shall not include 264 vending carts or mobile ice cream vendors. 265 266 b. MOBILE FOOD COURT: A parcel of land where two (2) or more mobile food businesses 267 congregate to offer food or beverages for sale to the public. Any cluster of more than one mobile food 268 business, vending cart and seasonal farm stand, located on the same parcel of land shall be considered a 269 mobile food court. 270 271 c. MOBILE FOOD TRAILER: A mobile food business that serves food or beverages from a 272 nonmotorized vehicle that is normally pulled behind a motorized vehicle. The term "mobile food trailer" 273 shall not include vending carts, mobile food trucks or mobile ice cream vendors. 274 275 d. MOBILE FOOD TRUCK: A mobile food business that serves food or beverages from an 276 enclosed self-contained motorized vehicle. The term "mobile food truck" shall not include vending carts, 277 mobile food trailers or mobile ice cream vendors. 278 279 e. VENDING CART: Includes any nonmotorized mobile device or pushcart from which limited 280 types of products, as listed in title 5, chapter 5.65 of this code, are sold or offered for sale directly to any 281 consumer, where the point of sale is conducted at the cart, where the duration of the sale is longer than 282 fourteen (14) days and where the vending cart meets the requirements of title 5, chapter 5.65 of this code 283 for the conducting of business in a specified permit operating area approved by the city. 284 285 286 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately after it has been published in 287 accordance with Utah Code § 10-3-711 and recorded in accordance with Utah Code § 10-3-713. 288 289 [end] 290 This page has intentionally been left blank 2. PROJECT CHRONOLOGY ERIN MENDENHALL DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY Mayor and NEIGHBORHOODS Tammy Hunsaker Director SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 PROJECT CHRONOLOGY Petition: PLNPCM2023-00938 November 15, 2023 Petition for the zoning text amendment initiated by Mayor Erin Mendenhall. November 20, 2023 Petition assigned to Seth Rios, Principal Planner. November 20, 2023 Information about the proposal was sent to all recognized community organizations to solicit public comments and start the 45-day Recognized Organization input and comment period. Nov 2023-April 2024 Planning staff hosted an online Open House to solicit public comments on the proposal. April 10, 2024 & May 8, 2024 Planning staff presented the proposal to the Business Advisory Board. Board members expressed feedback on the changes, and staff worked to incorporate their comments into the text amendment. May 30, 2024 Planning Staff posted notices on City and State websites for the Planning Commission meeting on June 12, 2024. May 30, 2024 Planning Staff posted public hearing notice signs with project information and notice of the Planning Commission public hearing at libraries across the City. June 12, 2024 The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the text amendment. By a vote of 6-0, the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council for the proposed text amendment. April 7, 2026 Planning Staff requested the zoning text amendment ordinance from the City Attorney’s office. April 20, 2026 Planning staff received the zoning map amendment ordinance from the City Attorney’s office. This page has intentionally been left blank 3. NOTICE OF CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Salt Lake City Council is considering Petition PLNPCM2023-00938 Mobile Business Text Amendment. Salt Lake City is proposing an update to regulations regarding mobile businesses on private property. The proposed text amendment addresses legislative changes in state law that limit the types of regulations cities can impose on mobile businesses. The intent of the amendment is to bring the City’s mobile business code into compliance with these new state regulations. As part of their study, the City Council is holding an advertised public hearing to receive comments regarding the petition. During this hearing, anyone desiring to address the City Council concerning this issue will be given an opportunity to speak. The hearing will be held: DATE: PLACE: Electronic and in-person options. 451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah ** This meeting will be held via electronic means while also providing an in-person opportunity to attend or participate in the hearing at the City and County Building, located at 451 South State Street, Room 326, Salt Lake City, Utah. For more information, including WebEx connection information, please visit www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meetings. Comments may also be provided by calling the 24-Hour comment line at 801.535.7654 or sending an email to council.comments@slcgov.com. All comments received through any source are shared with the Council and added to the public record. If you have any questions relating to this proposal or would like to review the file, please call Seth Rios at 801.535.7758 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or by e- mail at seth.rios@slc.gov. The application details can be accessed at slcpermits.com. To view the applicant’s submittal, click on the Planning tab, type the petition number (PLNPCM2023-00938) into the search bar, and click on record info. The submittal materials can be viewed under the “Attachments” tab. The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request, please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay service 711. This page has intentionally been left blank SALT LAKE CITY RESOLUTION NO._________OF 2026 Adopting Capital Improvement Program Allocations for fiscal year 2026-2027. A resolution adopting the attached Capital Improvement Program Allocations for the fiscal year 2026-2027. WHEREAS, pursuant to Salt Lake City Ordinance No. ____ of 2026, the Salt Lake City Council (“City Council”) adopted a final budget for the Salt Lake City Corporation (“City”) fiscal year 2026-2027; and WHEREAS, the budget adopted by the City included a budget for the capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, the City Council now wishes to formalize the appropriations for the capital improvement program. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this resolution is to adopt the capital improvement allocations for the City for fiscal year 2026-2027. SECTION 2. Adoption of Capital Improvement Allocations. The capital improvement allocations for fiscal year 2026-2027, which were included within the 2026-2027 budget, shall be and hereby are adopted according to the specific terms and conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. 11.Res.FY27.CIPSpecificAllocation 2 SECTION 3. Public Inspection. The City budget officer is hereby authorized and directed to certify and file copies of these capital improvement program allocations in the office of said budget officer and in the office of the City Recorder, which allocations shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect upon adoption. Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of _______________, 2026. Alejandro Puy, Council Chair ATTEST: Keith Reynolds, City Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM Office of the City Attorney Date: 05/04/2026 By: /s/Jaysen Oldroyd Jaysen R. Oldroyd, Senior City Attorney 11.Res.FY27.CIPSpecificAllocation 3 EXHIBIT A Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget & Capital Asset Plan FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Page: FY 2026-27 PROJECTS OVERVIEW 1 FY 2026-27 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 5 DEBT SERVICE CIP DEBT SERVICE CIP 19 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES 23 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS Street Reconstruction 2027 27 Sugar House Park 50/50 Match 28 GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Rack Replacements 29 Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027 30 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 31 Street Overlay 2027 32 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement)33 Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements 34 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027 35 Urban Trails 36 Facilities Replacement and Renewal 37 Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance 38 Street's Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility 39 Washington Park Septic Expansion 40 Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program 41 Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin)42 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings 43 EV Charging PSB Phase III 44 Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements 45 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom)46 Wasatch Hollow Dog Park 47 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access 48 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting 49 Glendale Park 50 Bike Racks 51 Cost Overrun 52 Percent for Art 53 ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS Terminal Fire Hydrant Relocation 58 Over Sized Mainline 59 Table of Contents Baggage Storage Office (BSO) Expansion 60 Security Checkpoint Demo & Expansion 61 Escalator & Stairs Terminal Level 1 to Level 2 62 Glycol Plant Main Electrical Distribution 63 Runway 16L-34R Extension Planning, Design, & EA - Phase II 64 Taxiway U Bridges 65 Taxiway E&F Rehabilitation (F3-F5) - (Design Only)66 State Hangar Taxilane 67 SVRA Contract Tower (Siting Study Only)68 3700 W Reconstruction & Improvements (Design Only)69 Rental Car QTA Car Wash Equipment Replacement 70 Rental Car Reallocation Phase II & Equipment 71 S Employee Parking Lot Development Program - Phase II Canal Relocation 72 GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS Tee Box Leveling 74 Pump Replacement 75 Maintenance Equipment 76 Irrigation Improvements - Nibley Park 77 Irrigation Improvements - Rose Park 78 Cart Path Improvements 79 Roof Repair 80 Driving Range Redesign 81 On Course Restroom 82 Maintenance Buildings 83 Deferred Maintenance - All 6 SLC Courses 84 Deferred Maintenance - Mountain Dell 85 Deferred Maintenance - Nibley Clubhouse 86 PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS Water Main Replacements 88 Treatment Plant Improvements 89 Deep Pump Wells; Pumping Plants and Pump Houses 90 Meter Change-Out Program 91 Water Service Connections 92 Storage Reservoirs 93 Culverts, Flumes & Bridges 94 Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)95 Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)96 Treatment Plants (Sewer Utility)97 Collection Lines 98 Storm Drain Lines 99 Riparian Corridor Improvements 100 Landscaping 101 Table of Contents Storm Water Lift Stations 102 Detention Basins 103 Street Lighting Projects 104 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS Japantown Art 106 Civic Center 107 500 West Improvements 108 SUSTAINABILITY CAPITAL PROJECTS Delong Street Operations Yard Improvement 110 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN 111 Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank CIP Summary Documents This page intentionally left blank CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Introduction and Overview Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed to replace or expand the City’s public infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the annual infrastructure improvements and budget schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget. The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development & Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district. The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor. The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and adopting the final CIP budget. The details of the recommended FY2026-27 CIP Budget are included in this book. In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into the decision-making process. Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs. The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress. All projects older than three years that do not show significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready projects. The Administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City’s capital improvement projects, the City analyzes the effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio. Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017 / Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management Policies Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify the expectations of the City’s Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in determining how to best address the City’s deferred and long-term maintenance needs. Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include: –A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches. –A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of $50,000 or more, with few exceptions. –Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and minimize maintenance and replacement costs. –Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in the preservation of the community’s prior investment. –The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an existing balance remains on a completed project. –Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding). Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 1 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FY 2026-27 Capital Improvement Allocations Salt Lake City’s FY2026-27 adopted CIP budget appropriates $360,680,819 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class “C” Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax Funds, Community Reinvestment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other public and private funds. The City’s General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project. The Library Fund covers the Local Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through the City’s Class C Road fund. Funds to pay debt service, equaling $10,146,933, are included in the adopted annual budget. Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City’s capital improvement projects. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City. A total of $17,330,500 was recommended for Transportation and Engineering projects. Of this amount, the budget appropriates $613,379 of General Fund, $2,463,036 of Restricted Property Tax funds, $1,964,000 of Funding our Future funds, $430,000 of Street Impact Fee funds, $4,652,515 of Class C funds, and $7,207,570 in ¼ Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax funding. Programs funded include Street Reconstruction, Traffic Signal Replacements and Upgrades, Street Overlay, Vision Zero Corridors and Safety Improvements, and Urban Trails. Projects funded include GREENBike Federal Grant Match and Bike Rack Replacements, 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossing, Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements, and Bike Racks. The recommended budget for Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total appropriation of $12,736,000 from the General Fund, Restricted Property Tax, Funding our Future, Parks Impact Fee, and ¼ Cent and 5th 5th Tax funds. Projects funded include Sugar House Culinary Water Line, Park Restrooms, Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements, Washington Park Septic Expansion, Parks' Legal Compliance with ADA Standards for Accessible Design, Wasatch Hollow Dog Park, New Lighting to Improve Safety and Access, Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting, and Glendale Park Phase II. Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of $$4,817,500. Of this amount, the budget appropriates $2,817,500 from the General Fund, and $2,000,000 in ¼ Cent and 5th 5th Sales Tax funding. Programs funded include Public Way Concrete Replacement and Rehabilitation, Facilities Replacement and Renewal, and Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance. Projects funded include Streets’ Legal Compliance with ADA Standards for Accessibility, and EV Charging at PSB Phase III. Capital Projects The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2026-27 Budget. These pages provide a breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project. The total for capital projects in the FY2026-27 budget is $34,884,000. Enterprise Fund Projects The City’s enterprise functions; Airport, Golf, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Street Lighting, Community Reinvestment, and Refuse Collection – are by nature, very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality. Airport Fund – The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports (the Airport) has 692 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The Fiscal Year 2027 budget continues to see modest growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants and the Airport Terminal Program (ATP) grants expired in FY 2026. The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) will continue to benefit from the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital projects. The Airport will be bringing on four Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 2 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 additional gates located on Concourse B in July 2026 and the final 7 gates in October 2026. These openings require additional staffing, maintenance, and IT requirements. The developed FY27 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These projects include Phase IV of The New SLC which consists of the final construction of gates on Concourse B. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years. Golf Fund - The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past five years and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects. In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. The Golf Division has budgeted $16,610,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY27. The Golf Division is in the middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each course and has allocated $175,000 in FY26 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course $7,500,000 and Nibley Park golf course $3,000,000. The Golf Division will look to build a new clubhouse at Nibley Park with potential public/private partnership with multiple industry and community partners and have allocated $2,500,000 for their potential share in this project. Other significant projects include new maintenance buildings at Bonneville and Rose Park, on-course restroom at Glendale and a new roof at Rose Park. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $777,321 in FY27 to purchase additional equipment. Public Utilities Funds – Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each operates as an independent enterprise fund, meaning they are not supported by tax dollars. Instead, funding comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally grants or subsidized loans from state or federal sources. To support major infrastructure investments, SLCDPU is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Additionally, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant is supporting the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction. Utility rates, set based on cost-of-service analysis, ensure that customers pay for the services they receive. Given the infrastructure-heavy nature of these utilities, SLCDPU relies on a long-term project and financing strategy to effectively manage its assets. The capital budget is organized by fund, with detailed cost centers under each. For Fiscal Year 2027, SLCDPU is managing over 95 capital projects across its four utility funds, in addition to ongoing projects. Many capital projects span multiple fiscal years – often designed in one year and built in the next. The budget prioritizes high-need projects identified through the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The largest project underway is the replacement of the Water Reclamation Facility, with estimated completion in Fiscal Year 2027. Other system components are also aging and will require increased investment in the coming years. For instance, SLCDPU’s three water treatment plants, built in the 1950s and early 1960s, are due for major updates. The City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction is scheduled for completion in 2027, while planning is underway for two remaining plants. SLCDPU’s capital planning is shaped by a complex mix of federal, state, and local regulations, as well as water rights and exchange agreement obligations – all of which influence project priorities and timeline. Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 3 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 CRA Funds – The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The CRA utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The CRA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The CRA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the CRA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the CRA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The CRA fiscal year 2027 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects: •Japantown Art: Designates an additional $100,000 for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors. •Civic Center: Allocates an additional $2,200,000 to provide climate friendly investment in shade, walkability, and economic development to attract families, workers, and visitors. The initiative aims to beautify the area and provide more green space to be enjoyed by all. •500 West Improvements: Provides an additional $3,300,000 to be used for beautification elements on 500 West from 600 South to 900 South. Sustainability Fund - Sustainability’s Energy & Environment Division supports other departments to minimize the environmental impact of City operations. The Energy & Environment Division does not have any proposed projects for FY 26-27. The Waste & Recycling Division has one project proposed to construct a shelter for container maintenance operations that occur at the Delong Street Operations Yard. Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 4 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Deb t S e r v i c e Debt Service Projects Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond $ 734,000 $ 734,000 Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond $ 1,944,550 $ 1,944,550 Sales Tax Series 2019A Bond $ 349,750 $ 349,750 Sales Tax Series 2019B Bond $ — $ — Sales Tax Series 2021 Bond $ — $ — Sales Tax Series 2022B Bond $ 2,003,500 $ 2,003,500 Sales Tax Series 2022C Bond $ 3,091,172 $ 3,091,172 ESCO Debt Service to Bond $ 853,986 $ 853,986 Fire Station #3 $ 672,925 $ 672,925 Fire Station #14 $ 497,050 $ 497,050 Debt Service Projects Total $ 8,976,958 $ — $ — $ 1,169,975 $ — $ — $ 10,146,933 Ong o i n g Ongoing Projects City Leases for Police Facilities $ 1,220,000 $ 1,220,000 Facilities Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Urban Trail Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Public Lands Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Vacant and Leased City-owned Property Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Ongoing Projects Total $ 2,320,000 $ — $ — $ — $ 200,000 $ — $ 2,520,000 Oth e r O n g o i n g Other Ongoing Public Services- ESCO County Steiner $ 155,300 $ 155,300 Public Services - Memorial House $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Other Ongoing $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 175,300 $ 175,300 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 5 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 New C I P New/Maintenance Projects Total Street Reconstruction 2027 $ 113,379 $ 514,536 $ 4,652,515 $ 3,047,070 $ 8,327,500 Sugar House Park 50/50 Match $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Rack Replacements $ 65,000 $ 65,000 Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 $ 200,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,000,000 Street Overlay 2027 $ 1,842,500 $ 1,457,500 $ 3,300,000 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement) $ 1,136,000 $ 1,136,000 Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027 $ 1,948,500 $ 121,500 $ 230,000 $ 2,300,000 Urban Trails $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Facilities Replacement and Renewal $ 2,737,500 $ 2,737,500 Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Street's Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Washington Park Septic Expansion $ 950,000 $ 950,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 6 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 New C I P ( C o n t i n u e d ) Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program $ 324,400 $ 486,600 $ 811,000 Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin) $ 213,000 $ 213,000 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings $ 263,000 $ 263,000 EV Charging PSB Phase III $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements $ 362,000 $ 362,000 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom) $ 568,000 $ 568,000 Wasatch Hollow Dog Park $ 556,000 $ 556,000 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access $ 460,000 $ 460,000 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting $ 955,000 $ 955,000 Glendale Park $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Bike Racks $ 50,000 $ 50,000 New Projects Total $ 4,680,879 $ 3,463,036 $ 3,100,000 $ 4,652,515 $ 9,293,400 $ 9,694,170 $ — $ 34,884,000 Cost Overrun $ 202,000 $ 202,000 Percent for Art $ 151,500 $ 151,500 Total General Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Tax Fund/Other Fund CIP Projects $ 16,331,337 $ 3,463,036 $ 3,100,000 $ 4,652,515 $ 9,894,170 $ 175,300 $ 48,079,733 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 7 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Air p o r t Airport CIP Projects Terminal Fire Hydrant Relocation $ 87,000 $ 87,000 Over Sized Mainline $ 10,371,000 $ 10,371,000 Baggage Storage Office (BSO) Expansion $ 2,217,100 $ 2,217,100 Security Checkpoint Demo & Expansion $ 3,917,900 $ 3,917,900 Escalator & Stairs Terminal Level 1 to Level 2 $ 3,902,000 $ 3,902,000 Glycol Plant Main Electrical Distribution $ 1,297,000 $ 1,297,000 Runway 16L-34R Extension Planning, Design, & EA - Phase II $ 1,950,000 $ 1,950,000 Taxiway U Bridges $ 20,000,000 $ 20,000,000 Taxiway E&F Rehabilitation (F3-F5) - (Design Only)$ 643,000 $ 643,000 State Hangar Taxilane $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 SVRA Contract Tower (Siting Study Only)$ 50,400,000 $ 50,400,000 3700 W Reconstruction & Improvements (Design Only) $ 6,706,000 $ 6,706,000 Rental Car QTA Car Wash Equipment Replacement $ 4,758,000 $ 4,758,000 Rental Car Reallocation Phase II & Equipment $ 5,200,000 $ 5,200,000 S Employee Parking Lot Development Program - Phase II Canal Relocation $ 21,960,000 $ 21,960,000 Total Airport CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 134,409,000 $ 134,409,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 8 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Gol f Golf CIP Projects Tee Box Leveling $ 175,000 $ 175,000 Pump Replacement $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Maintenance Equipment $ 777,321 $ 777,321 Irrigation Improvements - Nibley Park $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Irrigation Improvements - Rose Park $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000 Cart Path Improvements $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Roof Repair $ 260,000 $ 260,000 Driving Range Redesign $ 100,000 $ 100,000 On Course Restroom $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Maintenance Buildings $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Deferred Maintenance - All 6 SLC Courses $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Deferred Maintenance - Mountain Dell $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Deferred Maintenance - Nibley Clubhouse $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Total Golf CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 17,387,321 $ 17,387,321 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 9 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Pub l i c U t i l i t i e s Public Utilities CIP Projects Water Main Replacements $ 23,185,000 $ 23,185,000 Treatment Plant Improvements $ 48,800,000 $ 48,800,000 Deep Pump Wells; Pumping Plants and Pump Houses $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Meter Change-Out Program $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000 Water Service Connections $ 5,250,000 $ 5,250,000 Storage Reservoirs $ 1,150,000 $ 1,150,000 Culverts, Flumes & Bridges $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)$ 4,325,000 $ 4,325,000 Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)$ 24,000,000 $ 24,000,000 Treatment Plants (Sewer Utility)$ 19,021,603 $ 19,021,603 Collection Lines $ 14,285,162 $ 14,285,162 Storm Drain Lines $ 5,152,000 $ 5,152,000 Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Landscaping $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Storm Water Lift Stations $ 766,000 $ 766,000 Detention Basins $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Street Lighting Projects $ 1,440,000 $ 1,440,000 Total Public Utilities CIP Projects $—$—$—$—$—$—$154,954,765 $ 154,954,765 CRA Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) CIP Projects Japantown Art $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Civic Center $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 500 West Improvements $ 3,300,000 $ 3,300,000 Total CRA CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 5,600,000 $ 5,600,000 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 10 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Sus t a i n a b i l i t y Sustainability CIP Projects Delong Street Operations Yard Improvement $ 250,000 $ 250,000.00 Total Sustainability CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 312,601,086 $ 312,601,086 GRAND TOTAL $ 16,331,337 $ 3,463,036 $ 3,100,000 $ 4,652,515 $ 9,894,170 $ 312,776,386 $ 360,680,819 Salt Lake City General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / 1/4 Cent & 5th 5th Sales Tax / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT GF Restricted Property Tax FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ & 5th 5th SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 11 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Salt Lake City Impact Fee Summary Fiscal Year 2027 PROJECT Parks Impact Fees Streets Impact Fees TOTAL Impact Fee Projects Imp a c t F e e s Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027 $ 230,000 $ 230,000 Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program $ 324,400 $ 324,400 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom)$ 568,000 $ 568,000 Wasatch Hollow Dog Park $ 556,000 $ 556,000 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access $ 460,000 $ 460,000 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting $ 955,000 $ 955,000 Glendale Park $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 Total Impact Fee by Type $ 8,863,400 $ 430,000 $ 9,293,400 Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 12 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Salt Lake City Unfunded Projects Fiscal Year 2027 Unf u n d e d P r o j e c t s Public Lands Lighting Replacement to Improve Safety And Access Citywide $ 564,000 $ 564,000 Public Services Transit Capital Program 2027 Citywide $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Public Services Plaza 349 Balconies and Masonry Repairs and Improvements 349 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Public Services Demolition of Colfax and Odyssey House 223 Colfax Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84111623 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Public Lands Irrigation Upgrades and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping Program Citywide $ 1,200,000 $ 1,200,000 Transportation Bikeway Gaps 2027 Citywide $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Public Lands Civic Center Construction Documents (from 200 East to the Western Library Square Crescent Wall) 442 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 Constituent Repave Alley #4195 Alley #4195 between 1100 East and 1200 East, Approx. 875 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 $ 302,000 $ 302,000 Constituent Traffic Circle 700 S 500 West 700 South 500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84101 $ 577,000 $ 577,000 Public Services Access Control Transition to S2 Citywide $ 300,000 $ 300,000 Constituent Poplar Grove 500 S Traffic Calming 900 West to the Jordan River Trail on 500 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 464,000 $ 464,000 Public Services Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements 1600 Industrial Rd, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Transportation Missing Sidewalks Citywide $ 125,000 $ 125,000 Constituent Slow Down Liberty Wells South 1700 South to 2100 South, 300 East to 600 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 & 84105 $ 517,000 $ 517,000 Constituent Emerson Street 1500 East -1600 East Replacement Emerson Ave (1500 South) 1500 East to 1600 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 390,000 $ 390,000 Constituent Central 9th and Ballpark Traffic Safety Improvements Jefferson St and 900 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101Washington St and 900 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101West Temple and 900 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101West Temple and State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84101West Temple to 200 W on Mead Ave Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 $ 138,000 $ 138,000 Constituent Texas Street Replacement 1874 to 1977 S Texas Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 769,000 $ 769,000 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Total Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 13 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Unf u n d e d P r o j e c t s ( C o n t i n u e d ) Constituent Active Transportation User Improvements - Glendale Glendale, District 2, Salt Lake City, UT 84104:- Jordan River Trail/California Ave crossing near 1126 California Ave (Between Livable Streets Zone 18 & 48) (Along UTA Bus line 9 & 513) - California Ave between Redwood Road and Utah Street (Between Livable Streets Zone 52 and 36) (Along UTA Bus line 513) - Navajo St Circle, 1152 Navajo St, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (Between Livable Streets Zone 12 & 52) (Along UTA Bus line 9) - Navajo St & Glendale Dr intersection, 1192-1198 Glendale Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 (Livable Streets Zone 52) (Along UTA Bus line 9) $ 735,000 $ 735,000 Constituent Nibley Park School Crossing 2785 S 800 E, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Constituent Proposal for Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Improvements 300 E between 900 S and 1300 S and Hubbard Avenue between 200 E and 300 E, Salt Lake City, Utah 8411 $ 705,000 $ 705,000 Public Services Fire Alarm Additions Citywide $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Constituent Jordan Park Basketball Court 1060 South 900 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84104 $ 552,000 $ 552,000 Constituent Playground Shade Multiple playgrounds, Citywide $ 579,000 $ 579,000 Constituent Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff The neighborhood that is generally bounded by Parleys Way (on the south), Nevada Street (on the west), 2500 E (on the east), and Blaine Avenue (on the north). Generally the neighborhood streets around Beacon Heights Elementary, Hillside Middle School, and Cosgriff private school $ 438,000 $ 438,000 Constituent Curtis Park Playground Replacement 1421 S 2200 E Salt Lake City 84108 $ 433,000 $ 433,000 Public Lands 9-Line Greening: Transforming 9.5 Blocks of 900 South from Gray to Green 900 South, from 650 West to 500 East, Salt Lake City, UT $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 Constituent 800 E Traffic Islands 800 E from 1700S to 2100S, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 Constituent Gregson Avenue / Lincoln Street Asphalt Speed Bumps 949 East Gregson Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 and 3085 South Lincoln Street, Salt Lake City UT 84106 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Constituent 700 South Neighborhood Byway and 700 East Crossing 700 South 700 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 $ 1,119,000 $ 1,119,000 Public Services Justice Courts Interim Improvements 333 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 Constituent McClelland Trail Safety Improvements McClelland trail between 1560 S and 1300 S (Bryan, Kensington, Emerson, Roosevelt, Browning, and Harrison Avenue), Salt Lake City, 84015 $ 571,000 $ 571,000 Constituent Repave Alley 3rd & 4th Ave, and Alta & Virginia Alley between 3rd and 4th avenue and Virginia and Alta streets Salt Lake City, Utah 84103.$ 214,000 $ 214,000 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Total Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 14 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Unf u n d e d P r o j e c t s ( C o n t i n u e d ) Constituent Roxbury & Kensington Pedestrian Safety Kensington Avenue, from Wasatch Drive to Indian Hills Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108Roxbury Road, from 1300 S to Canterbury Dr., SLC, UT 84108 $ 380,000 $ 380,000 Constituent Main & Broadway Street Activation 10 West Broadway, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 $ 247,000 $ 247,000 Constituent 1300 South CIP North curb of 1300 South at its intersection with Foothill Boulevard on the south side of 1300 South to the west side of the intersection of 1300 S / 2300 E. This would essentially create a project corridor from Foothill Boulevard to 2300 East. Salt Lake City UT 84108 $ 278,000 $ 278,000 Constituent Greenway Connector - Chapman Library to Jordan River Parkway 600 South - between 900 West and 1000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 528,000 $ 528,000 Constituent Safe Side Street North Extension 1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South)Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 EastWilson Avenue 900 East - 1100 EastSalt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 412,000 $ 412,000 Constituent 700 E Beautification Project 1300 S to 2100 S on 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 2,328,000 $ 2,328,000 Constituent Pedestrian Placemaking at the Ballpark Library Lab 1406 S. West Temple St. Salt Lake City, UT 84115 $ 140,000 $ 140,000 Constituent Traffic Calming for Sherman Avenue Sherman Avenue (1335 South) between 1300 East and 1500 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 72,000 $ 72,000 Constituent Median Conversion to Parklet 2518 E Skyline Dr. Salt Lake City, UT 84108 , (Median grass island)$ 52,000 $ 52,000 Constituent First Encampment Park 1704 South 500 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 $ 53,000 $ 53,000 Constituent Sunnyside Ave & Amanda Safe Street Crossing Street block coordinates are Sunnyside Avenue (850 South) at Amanda Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 Constituent Virginia Street Safety and Mobility Improvements 70 Virginia Street, Salt Lake City, 84103 to 357 Virginia Street, Salt Lake City, 84103 $ 161,000 $ 161,000 Constituent Atkin Avenue Curb and Gutter 1300 Atkin Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT, 841061350 Atkin Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 $ 218,000 $ 218,000 Constituent Outdoor Calisthenics Equipment 1060 S 900 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 87,000 $ 87,000 Constituent Rosslyn Heights Corridor Island 2000 East Street, between 2280-2300 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 $ 487,000 $ 487,000 Public Lands Event Infrastructure for Vibrant, Safe City Parks Program 1700 South River Park: 1200 W 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 580,000 $ 580,000 Constituent Public Pet Memorial Bend in the River - Closest address 1005 Fremont Ave WHidden Hollow - Closest address 1165 Wilmington Ave Or other location as deemed appropriate by Public Lands staff $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Constituent Nature Park at Bonneville Golf Course Bonneville Golf Course, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ 1,268,000 $ 1,268,000 Constituent Hubbard Ave (200 East to 300 East)200/300 Block of Hubbard Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Total Unfunded CIP Projects $ 28,338,000 $ 28,338,000 Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Total Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents 15 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 This page intentionally left blank Debt Service Capital Improvement Program This page intentionally left blank Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $734,000 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds September 2014 October 1, 2034 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property, and roads. The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of $10,935,000. As of June 30, 2026, $5,855,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2034. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $1,944,550 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds June 2016 October 1, 2028 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the Series 2009A Bonds. The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition, construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City offices and other capital improvements within the City. Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $21,715,000. As of June 30, 2026, $7,315,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2028. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $349,750 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 April 1, 2027 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown. The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of $2,620,000. As of June 30, 2026, $340,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April 1, 2027. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2021 October 1, 2034 General Fund/Library Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2021, were issued in December 2021 to refund a portion of the Series 2013B Bonds and a portion of the LBA Series 2013A and 2014A Bonds. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 19 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 The Series 2021 bonds were issued with a par amount of $15,045,000. A portion of the debt service is paid by the Library for the LBA 2013A and 2014A (Glendale and Marmalade libraries). As of June 30, 2026, $11,810,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2034. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds January 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund/CRA Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022A, were issued in January 2022 to refund the Series 2012A Bonds. The Series 2012A Bonds were originally issued to fund the construction and improvement of various City roads, including the replacement of the North Temple Viaduct and improving North Temple Boulevard. The Series 2022 A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,900,000. As of June 30, 2026, $6,350,000 in principal remains outstanding. The debt service is currently mostly funded by tax increment revenue from the CRA related to the North Temple Viaduct project. General Fund pays debt service when the tax increment revenue does not fully cover the debt service and for the North Temple Boulevard portion. Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2032. Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $2,003,500 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2042 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022C 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $3,091,172 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2022B&C, were issued in November 2022 to finance all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving capital improvement projects, including: City Cemetery irrigation and road repairs and reconstruction; Pioneer Park; 600 North Corridor; new radio towers for City communication; an upgrade of the electrical transformer at the Central Plant and emergency back-up generators; Westside railroad quiet zones; Warm Spring Plunge structure stabilization; Smith's Ballpark; urban wood re-utilization equipment and storage additions; and Fisher Mansion stabilization; and various other capital improvement program projects. The Series 2022B bonds were issued with a par amount of $40,015,000. As of June 30, 2026, $40,015,000 in principal remains outstanding. The first Principal payment is due on October 1, 2033 and annually thereafter on October 1. Interest is due semi- annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2042. The Series 2022C bonds were issued with a par amount of $24,240,000. As of June 30, 2026, $18,175,000 in principal remains outstanding. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 20 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature October 1, 2032. ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $337,082 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient-equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of this facility is shared 50% with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment. ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $516,904 Capital Lease August 2012 January 2029 General Fund This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy-efficient equipment for City parks. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $497,050 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds March 2016 April 15, 2037 Impact Fees The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March 2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project. The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $6,755,000. As of June 30, 2026, $4,350,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on April 15, 2037. Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $672,925 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds April 2017 April 15, 2038 Impact Fees The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April 2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project. The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,115,000. As of June 30, 2026, $5,935,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on April 15, 2038. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 21 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B 2027 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source $—Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 April 1, 2038 CRA Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, were issued in October 2013 for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, and equipping a performing arts center and related improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B. The CRA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the CRA is unable to pay any of the debt service, the City’s General Fund would be responsible for it. The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000. As of June 30, 2026, $55,290,000 in principal remains outstanding. Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on April 1, 2038. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 22 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES City Leases for Police Facilities Payments 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $1,220,000 General Fund Yearly payments for City Leases for Police facilities including the Community Connections Center, Crime Lab, Downtown Central Precinct, and the North Temple Substation. Facilities Maintenance 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $350,000 General Fund The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City’s building stock. Urban Trail Maintenance 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $200,000 ¼ Cent Tax These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails and trail segments that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe for all that use them and so they can be used year-round. Public Lands Maintenance 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $250,000 General Fund The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems early on and prevent larger failures in the City’s park stock. Percent for Art 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $151,500 General Fund To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, and other works of art. (1.5% of CIP) Cost Overrun 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $202,000 General Fund Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 23 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 CIP Memorial House 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $20,000 Other - Rental A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation. Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use of the funding is to be determined. Vacant City-owned Property Maintenance and Development 2027 Budget Origination Date Funding Source $500,000 General Fund Salt Lake City Corporation holds several properties in its real estate inventory that are not used for City functions but that are either vacant or are leased to third parties. This fund is for the maintenance, security, and improvement of these properties. Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP 24 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 General Fund Capital Projects This page intentionally left blank Project Title:Street Reconstruction 2027 Project Address:Citywide Project Description: This program funds reconstructions of Salt Lake City streets including associated design improvements for walking, bicycling, and transit, as required by City Ordinance and federal law. When a street is reconstructed, the entire right of way is surveyed and deficiencies corrected to all elements including roadway, drainage, sidewalks, and street trees. The program meets all federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are always triggered with a complete reconstruction. This year's funding request is higher than FY26's $4.5 million to allow reconstruction of more lane miles, in keeping with the ongoing deterioration of the city's street network. Streets tentatively to include: 200 S (Univ St to 1300 E) in prep for S Davis Connector; 600 East (100 S to 400 S) in combination with FY26 constituent CIP; Gilmer Dr. (Douglas to 1300 E); 900 South (Diestel to LeGrande); Military Dr. (900 S to 1700 E); Emerson Ave (1500 E to 1700 E); Texas St. (N terminus to 2100 S); Belaire Dr (Scenic to Glen Oaks); and 500 West (600 S to 900 S). This is the first year without funds from the 2018 Streets Bond; ideal funding would be closer to $50-60 million per year. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-1 Department:CAN - Engineering Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $113,379 Restricted Property Tax $514,536 Class C Funds $4,500,000 $4,652,515 Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $2,989,500 $3,047,070 TOTAL:$7,489,500 $8,327,500 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: This project is expected to decrease the expenses of the Streets Division in maintaining pavement and street signs but may increase maintenance costs for ADA crosswalks and other updated facilities incorporated into the street. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 27 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Sugar House Park 50/50 Match Project Address:Sugar House Park, 1330 2100 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 Project Description: This project (a 50/50 cost share with Salt Lake County) will make a critical infrastructure improvement to Sugar House Park. The replacement of the culinary waterline, which is nearing the end of its useful life and may soon be in a state of critical failure. Failure of the water line would result in park closure and significant emergency maintenance costs. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-23 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $1,000,000 Restricted Property Tax $1,000,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$1,000,000 $1,000,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Decreased operating cost for water line, by approximately $8,000-$10,000 annually. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 28 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Rack Replacements Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Salt Lake City’s bike share system, GREENbike, has received $792,455 in federal funds that require $57,545 in city match. This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations. GREENbike's oldest equipment is over 12 years old and has been exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. The balance of this funding request will be used to replace old, rusted, bent, or missing bike racks and/or bike corrals which primarily support Salt Lake City's local business districts and nodes, including many small retail and restaurant businesses. Federal grants: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-4 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $65,000 $65,000 TOTAL:$65,000 $65,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Capital investments in GREENbike will decrease maintenance needs. The annual maintenance impact for bike racks is unknown because bike rack damage has not been tracked historically. Bike racks are now inventoried in Cartegraph (the City's asset management system) and an estimate will be available in the future. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 29 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027 Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Funds replacement of concrete street panels, broken sidewalks, and rehabilitation such as sawcutting & labjacking for safety considerations. This program has great need and could easily use $1.5 million per year. This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 5 years has averaged 63%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-19 Department:Public Services- Streets Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $750,000 $750,000 TOTAL:$750,000 $750,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: No budget impact, preserves existing concrete assets while reducing ongoing maintenance requirements. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 30 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Salt Lake City's Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been adequately funded for years. As a result, traffic signals throughout the city are falling into failing condition, requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics and wiring each year. When a traffic signal fails, it is not as obvious as a pothole -- unless the signal pole rusts through and the signal falls over, which can happen. More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a simple timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light running, and crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff attention to physical repairs and/or resetting the signal's computers. For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements per year and 5 upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years.However, since only zero, one or two signals have been funded each year, this program continues to fall further behind. This financially constrained request of $2.5 million seeks to fund full replacement of 4 ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus 6 capital upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Locations tentatively to include: 1300 E 100 S; Main St. North Temple; 600 E 500 S; 500 E 600 S. Alternates: Arapeen / Sunnyside; 1300 E 200 S. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-2 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $200,000 ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $2,000,000 $1,800,000 TOTAL:$2,000,000 $2,000,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: This project is expected to decrease the expenses of the Streets Division in maintaining aging signals. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 31 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Street Overlay 2027 Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Short segments of streets focused on preventing deterioration that would require a full reconstruction. Includes streets in livable streets zones and along neighborhood byways. Streets tentatively to include: 1000 North (Featherstone Drive to Redwood Road); 1200 West (1400 South to Andrew Avenue); 1500 West (Hayes Avenue to American Avenue); Alta Street (Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road); Connor Street (Sunnyside Avenue to 900 South); Livingston Avenue (Star Crest Drive to Omni Drive); Omni Drive (Omni Avenue to Livingston Avenue); South Temple Street (University Street to South Temple traffic circle); Village View Street (Village Hill Avenue to Village Park Avenue); Brava Street (Amiga Drive to cul-de-sac end); Reveille Circle (Colonel Road to cul-de-sac-end). Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-3 Department:CAN - Engineering Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds Funding Our Future $1,842,500 $1,842,500 ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $1,457,500 $1,457,500 TOTAL:$3,300,000 $3,300,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: This project is expected to decrease the expenses of the Streets Division in maintaining pavement but may increase maintenance costs for ADA crosswalks or paint striping. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 32 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement) Project Address:Herman Franks Park: 1371 S 700 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84105Riverside Park: 1491 W 600 N, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Project Description: This project will fund the replacement of one failing restrooms of Salt Lake City's 47 park restrooms, and upgrade one (Riverside Park). Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, frequently closed or unusable when they are intended to be open due to vandalism and misuse. New restrooms will improve safety and maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with the 2010 ADA Standards and increase accessibility. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-26 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds Funding Our Future $1,136,000 $1,136,000 TOTAL:$1,136,000 $1,136,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Directly and immediately decreases maintenance costs by up to $10,000 citywide for two restroom replacements (approximately $5,000 in maintenance savings per restroom per year) Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 33 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements Project Address:Jordan Park, 1060 S 900 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Project Description: Currently, the northern parking lot at Jordan Park is not appropriately connected to the City's stormwater and sewer systems, causing frequent back-ups into the parking lot and northern portion of the park. This emergency maintenance project would allow for adequate, safe connections to the City's sewer and stormwater systems and compliance with Public Utilities, alleviate maintenance burdens for Parks Division operations teams, and allow for safe and healthy park use by visitors. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-22 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $300,000 $300,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$300,000 $300,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Direct decrease of up to $3,000 annually. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 34 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027 Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in a city. While all crashes cannot be avoided, proven safety countermeasures can help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders. This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A) that was formulated, after being funded by Congress, under the leadership of former SLC Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson. The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the Wasatch Front Regional Council, with Salt Lake City as a partner. The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake City where safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are state highways, but some are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. This request seeks targeted funds to focus on those corridors with a significant crash history, and with characteristics that can be made safer with infrastructure investments.This program funds two aspects: (1) $1.2 million Vision Zero Corridors Phase II, addressing key safety concerns on top three identified SLC corridors in Comprehensive Safety Action Plan: 900 West, 800 South, and Redwood Road. These 3 corridors were recommended in WFRC's 2024 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan for a total of $128.5 million. SLC is selecting strategic and feasible projects within those recommendations to implement first. More expensive elements are likely to be grant funded and/or combined with future street reconstructions. (2) $1.1 million safety improvements citywide including selected crosswalks near schools. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-6 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $1,948,500 Restricted Property Tax $1,948,500 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $230,000 $230,000 Funding Our Future $121,500 $121,500 TOTAL:$2,300,000 $2,300,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Some departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project, such as concrete maintenance or traffic signal maintenance of new assets. Other departments may have decreased operating expenses, such as responses to traffic crashes or medical transport. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 35 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Urban Trails Project Address:Citywide Project Description: This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year's funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-5 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $450,000 $450,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$450,000 $450,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Some departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 36 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Facilities Replacement and Renewal Project Address:Citywide Project Description: This program supports our goal of keeping City facilities safe, code-compliant, and functional by addressing existing building assets that are beyond their useful life, nearing or at failure, or no longer meeting operational needs. Asset management data (Cartegraph) and recent Facility Condition Assessment reports help identify likely priorities; this list is a starting point, but facility needs require flexibility to adapt to changing conditions, funding, and real-time insights. Consistent investment is critical and without it, the maintenance backlog will continue to grow, making it more difficult and costly to maintain safe, reliable, and compliant facilities. These investments help prevent failures, reduce emergency repairs, avoid service disruptions, and support ongoing regulatory compliance. Below are the definitions of priorities 1–4.1. Life Safety & Code Compliance - Assets that ensure the building is safe for occupancy and meets legal codes and emergency standards.2. Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) - Assets that provide structural support and protect the building from external elements.3. Core Infrastructure Systems (MEP) - Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems that support base building operations.4. Operational Building Systems - Assets that support day-to-day function, accessibility, and internal operations. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-10 Department:Public Services- Facilities Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $2,737,500 $2,737,500 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$2,737,500 $2,737,500 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Reduced, repairing and replacing existing facility assets lowers ongoing maintenance needs. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 37 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance Project Address:Citywide Project Description: This funding is to address the need for ongoing lifecycle replacement for traffic signal components/assets. This is to ensure long-term cost savings compared to reactive replacement. Traffic signals and pedestrian facilities are critical infrastructure components that directly affect safety, mobility, equity, and quality of life. It enhances accessibility for all users, including those with disabilities. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-20 Department:Public Services- Streets Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $500,000 $500,000 TOTAL:$500,000 $500,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: No budget impact, replacing existing signal assets lowers ongoing maintenance needs. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 38 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Street's Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility Project Address:Citywide Project Description: ADA Ramps provide a fully accessible public right-of-way, which is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cities are required to update ramps and ADA access to meet federal law (Americans with Disabilities Act - ADA), ensure safety and independence for people with limitations, which triggers requirements for compliant curb ramps to allow safe movement between streets and sidewalks. Outdated or missing ramps and sidewalks force people into the street, create hazards, and disconnect neighborhoods. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-21 Department:Public Services - Streets Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $750,000 TOTAL:$750,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: $1,200 yearly. This project preserves and upgrades existing concrete assets to meet ADA compliance. While newer concrete has less maintenance, ADA ramps do require some specialized maintenance. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 39 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Washington Park Septic Expansion Project Address:Washington Park: 7945 E Mountain Dell Golf Rd, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 Project Description: Currently, the capacity of the septic system at Washington Park is insufficient to serve the current use. Due to the increased use (Salt Lake City's most reserved pavilions and event space) and the age and capacity of the current system, Parks Division staff spend considerable time pumping and maintaining the current system, which diminishes their capacity to maintain other parks and costs the City more money. By upgrading the system, maintenance time and frequency of pumping would decrease. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-27 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $950,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$950,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Direct and significant decrease up to $80,000 annually in maintenance, operations, and emergency repair costs. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 40 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Parks' Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is federal civil rights law, and the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Three types of park infrastructure at up to seven parks will be improved to or beyond the aforementioned standards: (1) site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and accessible ground surfacing under play areas; (4) access to and within restrooms. This is a build-to-budget request. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-29 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: Renewal Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $324,400 ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $486,600 TOTAL:$811,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Neutral maintenance impact for existing infrastructure to be upgraded, but increase in maintenance for new infrastructure, between $1,000 and $4,000 per site annually. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 41 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin) Project Address:Kenwood St and Atkin Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT 84106 Project Description: A portion of Highland Park Elementary's designated "Safe Routes to School" is lacking sidewalks and curb & gutter. It is on Kenwood Street, right at the school's west exit and continues on Atkin Avenue until the crosswalk (with a crossing guard) on Imperial Street. It is a high traffic area, with many students walking or biking in an area with limited visibility, no safe pathway, and many cars. It is dangerous we want our students to be able to safely walk and bike to school. Proposal ID:509197 Department:CAN - Engineering Project Type:Capital Category: New - Constituent Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $213,000 $213,000 TOTAL:$213,000 $213,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Some departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 42 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings Project Address:1700 South 600 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 Project Description: The 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings CIP aims to make safety improvements to intersections with neighborhood byways from 200 East to 1200 East. 6 neighborhood byways cross 1700 South through this stretch, with many of these critical crossings lacking any kind of increased visibility, traffic control, or protection for people walking or biking on these byways and attempting to cross 1700 South, greatly hindering the connectivity of these routes. This CIP focuses on the crossings at 200 East, 400 East, 800 East, 1000 East, and 1200 East (McClelland Trail), covering the Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park, and Sugar House communities. The crossing improvements would utilize strategies to reduce the crossing distance, improve visibility, and provide physical refuge for pedestrians and cyclists, including bulb-outs and refuge islands. This corridor provides access to schools, grocery stores, local businesses, parks, and lots of housing, and these improvements could greatly improve the active transportation network and access to Bus Route 17. This project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions for SLC's sustainability goals. Proposal ID:508983 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: New - Constituent Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds ¼ Cent & 5th 5th Tax $263,000 $263,000 TOTAL:$263,000 $263,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Some departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses due to this project. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 43 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:EV Charging PSB Phase III Project Address:475 S 300 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Project Description: We are requesting funding for Phase 3, the final phase, of the EV charging infrastructure project at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a critical facility supporting Police, Fire, the Emergency Operations Center, and combined dispatch. The overall project provides 20 Level 2 charging ports to support approximately 50 Public Services, Police, and Fire vehicles.Phases 1 and 2 establish the necessary electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer and supporting upgrades identified by Kimley-Horn & Sawatch. Phase 3 completes the project by installing the remaining chargers, allowing the charging system to be fully utilized as designed and ensuring the facility can support the City’s expanding EV fleet. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-18 Department:Public Services – Facilities Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $80,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$80,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: The anticipated cost for the Facilities Division to maintain is $0 - $1,200 per station per year or maintenance could be contracted out for a flat rate of a few hundred dollars per station per year. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 44 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements Project Address:1105 W 1000 N, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Project Description: Rose Park Elementary has been collaborating with Bike Utah, the Rose Park Community Learning Center, and SLC Transportation since June 2024 to improve safety for students who walk and bike to school. The project purpose is to identify the safest routes to school for students and improve intersections where even the safest routes have barriers. This part of the project was informed by traffic safety data, 2 community bilingual open houses, and a bike safety audit during the 2024-25 school year, resulting in the Rose Park Elementary Safe Routes to School Assessment (attached). The school community and traffic safety data agreed: the crossings along 900W, particularly at the intersections of 800N and 900N, as well as Sterling Dr & American Dr, present major barriers for students trying to access the school neighborhood and other amenities from their apartments. Improvements to 900W are planned, however they do not reach this neighborhood. Rose Park Elementary, Bike Utah, and SLC Transportation are planning a quick-build installation for late October to address these crossings temporarily. However, the proposed permanent crossing solutions are appropriate and will bring relief to many students and other community members in this densely populated yet isolated block of the Rose Park neighborhood. The intersection of Sterling Dr and American Beauty Dr, where students frequently cross on their way to school, is only a two way stop and cars going north-south cut through the neighborhood.This application proposes to make the crossings on 900W at 800N and at 900N safer through infrastructure change via RRFB's, concrete islands, speed feedback signs, and school crosswalks. These measures will capture the attention of drivers and slow them down. We also propose adding stop signs at American Beauty Dr and Sterling Dr to create a four-way stop. Together, these measures will create a safer and more comfortable route for children walking, scooting, or biking to school. Proposal ID:509087 Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: New - Constituent Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds 1/4 Cent $362,000 $362,000 TOTAL:$362,000 $362,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Increased Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 45 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom) Project Address:11th Avenue Park: 581 Terrace Hills Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 Project Description: This project will fund the strategic installation of one new restroom in Salt Lake City. Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable when they are intended to be open due to poor design and vandalism. New restrooms will improve safety, maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with ADA and increase accessibility. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-30 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $568,000 $568,000 TOTAL:$568,000 $568,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Initial increase in operational costs due to new infrastructure, of approximately $6,000-$8,500 per restroom. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 46 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Wasatch Hollow Dog Park Project Address:Wasatch Hollow Park: 1650 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 Project Description: During our meeting on June 25, 2025, the council discussed the current un-fenced, time-restricted off-leash dog area and its challenges.After thorough deliberation and community input, the Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) voted in favor of sending a recommendation to the City to fence an approximate 0.5-acre off-leash dog area within the park. The motion was passed with 28 votes in favor and 1 abstention.We believe that fencing the off-leash dog area will address the concerns raised by community members and enhance the safety and usability of the park for all visitors.We kindly request your support in advancing this recommendation through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application process. We understand that the scope and funding of the project depend on the application's acceptance. In addition, the WHCC board would welcome a meeting with representatives from the City as the process progresses to discuss the details of the fenced area. Proposal ID:509070 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: New - Constituent Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $556,000 $556,000 TOTAL:$556,000 $556,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Increased, approximately $7,000 increase in maintenance annually. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 47 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access Project Address: Potential Locations:1700 South River Park: 1200 W 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104Glendale Park: 1235 W 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Project Description: This project will strategically add lighting to parks to both improve safety throughout key parks and to extend play for sport fields and courts. Lighting added to entire parks will help improve sight lines, safety and the perception of safety, comfort, usability, level of service, and will allow for better monitoring of historically underutilized spaces. Sport and field lighting will allow for extended play during darker months and will allow spaces to be more activated during park opening hours. This is a build-to-budget request. Proposal ID:FY27-CAP-32 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $460,000 $460,000 TOTAL:$460,000 $460,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Initial increases will be approximately $2,500 annually per site depending on number of fixtures and purpose. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 48 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting Project Address:1235 W 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Project Description: This project would install lighting at the popular Glendale Park pickleball and tennis courts. Proposal ID:508814 Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: New - Constituent Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $955,000 $955,000 TOTAL:$955,000 $955,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Increased by approximately $2,500 annually for all courts. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 49 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Glendale Park Project Address:1235 W 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Project Description: This funding will help to advance Phase II improvements, which could include improvements in the center of the site or adjacent to the Jordan River, as identified in the Vision Plan. Design to confirm which amenities will advance in Phase II is now underway with construction anticipated to begin on Phase II in 2026.This funding will also be used for Glendale Park project contingency. Proposal ID:N/A Department:Public Lands Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds $6,000,000 TOTAL:$6,000,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: For $6,000,000 in improvements for Phase 2, it is estimated that maintenance would increase by approximately $100,000-$200,000 annually. As projections continue to be refined, these estimates are scaled based on maintenance projections of the entire Phase 2 area, and previous maintenance impacts of Phase 1. Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 50 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Bike Racks Project Address:Citywide Project Description: This funding will be used for the purchase and installation of new bicycle racks citywide with a focus near local businesses in high-demand areas to support cyclists and improve access to nearby shops and services. Funds will not be used for renewal or replacement. Proposal ID:N/A Department:CAN - Transportation Project Type:Capital Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $50,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$50,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: $2,000 to $3,000 in Streets operating budget Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 51 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Cost Overrun Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects. Proposal ID:NA Department: Project Type:Overrun Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $202,000 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$202,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: None Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 52 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Percent for Art Project Address:Citywide Project Description: Funding set aside to provide art at City developed projects. Matt Monsoon, What We Build Together (2025)500 North 1300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116Photo courtesy of Salt Lake City Arts Council Proposal ID:NA Department: Project Type:Art Category: New Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund $151,500 Class C Funds Impact Fee Funds TOTAL:$151,500 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: None Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects 53 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 This page intentionally left blank Enterprise Fund Capital Projects This page intentionally left blank The Department of Airports The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports (the Airport) has 692 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience. The Fiscal Year 2027 budget continues to see modest growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants and the Airport Terminal Program (ATP) grants expired in FY 2026. The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) will continue to benefit from the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital projects. The Airport will be bringing on four additional gates located on Concourse B in July 2026 and the final 7 gates in October 2026. These openings require additional staffing, maintenance, and IT requirements. The developed FY27 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These projects include Phase IV of The New SLC which consists of the final construction of gates on Concourse B. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield, landside, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years. Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 57 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Terminal Fire Hydrant Relocation Project Description: This project will relocate a fire hydrant currently located within the pedestrian walkway along the commercial curb at the southeast corner of the Terminal, near the Economy Lot busing queues. The existing hydrant restricts pedestrian circulation and creates congestion for passengers with luggage, strollers, and mobility devices. Work includes abandoning the existing hydrant piping, installing a new fire line connection, and relocating the hydrant assembly in compliance with NFPA and Salt Lake City Public Utilities requirements. The concrete pavement will be restored to meet airport standards. This relocation will improve pedestrian flow, ADA accessibility, and overall safety along one of the airport’s busiest curbside areas while maintaining full fire protection coverage for the Terminal. Project Justification: This project is necessary to improve pedestrian circulation and safety at the Terminal curbside by relocating a fire hydrant currently obstructing the public walkway. The relocation will maintain public accessibility and safety, enhance ADA accessibility, and maintain compliance with NFPA requirements and Salt Lake City Public Utilities requirements. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 April 2027 July 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $55,000 $12,000 $2,000 $1,000 $17,000 $87,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $87,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 58 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Over Sized Mainline Project Description: This project will design and install two (2) new mainline induction points from Level 3 to the Ski Bag Inspection System (SKI-BIS) for oversized baggage. These lines will need to exit the terminal building to the east and west side, run parallel to the terminal, turn into the inbound baggage area, and finally merge with SKI-BIS. The SKI-BIS is a secondary Checked Baggage Inspection System (CBIS) for the baggage expansion project where Over Sized (OS) baggage and skis are inspected separately from regular sized baggage. These lines will need to include catwalk access for maintenance. Project Justification: The Airport has reached a point where multiple times a year the Baggage Handling System (BHS) is beyond capacity and can no longer sustain the influx of Over Sized (OS) baggage. In 2024 the Airport exceeded capacity in the system over 2 dozen times, causing long wait times, slow throughput, and missed baggage for many flights. Although the current SKI-BIS project aims to deal with some of these issues, it unfortunately falls short of dealing with the mainline congestion since it still uses the original induction points to transfer bags into SKI-BIS after the main system choke point. The intent is to induct OS bags onto an independent mainline system direct to the newly installed SKI-BIS. This will allow a route around the choke points and inherently gives the Airport a processing redundancy. These new lines can be used to insert regular luggage in the event of loss of the main lines that exist today. This will allow extra capacity and faster throughput times by separating regular bags from OS bags. As previously mentioned, missed bags cause the airlines thousands of dollars per year and for the upcoming 2026 ski season, the BHS system can no longer keep up with the demands and will likely under-perform at a higher rate than last season. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 April 2027 December 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $6,960,000 $1,183,000 $70,000 $70,000 $2,088,000 $10,371,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $10,371,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 59 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Baggage Storage Office (BSO) Expansion Project Description: This project includes construction of 5 new baggage storage offices (BSO) located at the southwest corner of the terminal building. Each office includes a reception area and storage area and would be built to closely match the BSO offices at the southeast corner. Project Justification: This project is associated with the proposed security checkpoint expansion project. That project will remove restrooms and 3 BSO offices, necessitating that new offices be constructed elsewhere. The proposed area is able to accommodate the construction of additional offices for future airlines. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 November 2026 April 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $1,466,000 $220,000 $18,000 $146,600 $366,500 $2,217,100 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $2,217,100 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 60 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Security Checkpoint Demo & Expansion Project Description: This project expands the TSA queue lanes eastward requiring demolition of existing restroom and baggage storage offices (BSO). Work includes the following new work items: drywall, ceiling, fire alarm and suppression, terrazzo, doors, MEP, cameras, PA system, and signage. Project Justification: Expanding the TSA queue space will provide additional capacity that will eliminate backups into the baggage claim area during peak periods; will allow for the creation of a new dedicated family queue lane; and will give SLC greater flexibility in how ADA passengers are queued and screened, with the goals of increased efficiency and better customer service in mind. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date April 2026 July 2027 March 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $2,878,300 $35,400 $269,600 $734,600 $3,917,900 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $2,590,300 $1,327,600 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 61 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Escalator & Stairs Terminal Level 1 to Level 2 Project Description: This project will install a second 32" escalator from the Level 1 checkpoint up to Level 2. This new escalator willbe installed where the existing stairs are, adjacent to the existing escalator. The existing stairs will be relocated tobe above the existing Sally Port, which will also be modified. Work includes demo and new construction forflooring, ceiling, walls, MEP, fire system, and lighting. The work also requires relocation of a major cable tray. Project Justification: The L1 checkpoint was originally designed for international recheck and for overflow. In recent years, thischeckpoint has been converted to a regular checkpoint and has become quite busy; enough that TSA hasreceived funding for 2 additional screening lanes and a possible third. This project will increase capacity of thevertical transportation system which currently consists of 1 escalator, one stairway, and one elevator. In addition,the second escalator will provide redundancy should the lone existing escalator unexpectedly fail. Without thisredundancy, the elevator would not provide the needed capacity and queuing would occur.. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date April 2026 February 2027 March 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $2,889,400 $32,200 $258,000 $722,400 $3,902,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $3,902,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 62 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Glycol Plant Main Electrical Distribution Project Description: The Glycol Plant Main Electrical Distribution is currently undersized and has no capacity for any additional equipment to be added or increased in size due to exceeding allowable electrical code restrictions. The system is currently exceeding the allowable ampacities of 80% continuous loading, exceeding the 4 hour minimum. The plant operates on five (5) day, 24 hours per day intervals once online. The scope of this project will be to upsize the Meter Main Distribution Equipment to a 3,000 amp service, replacing the current 1600 amp service, the RMP Transformer, Main Distribution Panel, and Automatic Transfer Switch. Project Justification: The existing Glycol Plant Main Electrical Distribution is limited by its ability to add any additional equipment since it is past the 80% restrictions for continuous use. The plant is on a 1200 amp main breaker and during operations it is pulling 980 amps, exceeding the allowable guidelines. There is a need to add additional equipment and upsize, which is not currently possible. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 4/1/2027 November 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $876,000 $140,000 $9,000 $9,000 $263,000 $1,297,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $1,297,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 63 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Runway 16L-34R Extension Planning, Design, & EA - Phase II Project Description: The 2022 Airport Master Plan determined that Runway 16L-34R should be extended in the near term to accommodate the growing demand for long-haul international flights. A runway length analysis has been performed to determine the correct length to build the runway and now the planning effort must continue to include several enabling projects that will also need to be analyzed. Enabling projects potentially include the power line relocation, taxiway extensions to the new runway threshold, relocation of NAVaids, developing new flight procedures, integrating deicing, the realignment of 2100 North, and an environmental analysis. This runway extension will likely require an Environmental Assessment (EA) as part of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The EA will state the purpose and need of the proposed action, identify reasonable alternatives, and assess potential environmental impacts of the project. The intent for this project is to perform Planning, Design, and fund the kickoff of the NEPA Process for the 16L-34R Runway Extension Program. Project Justification: The runway extension project will allow long-haul international commercial operations, as well as provide operational take-off efficiencies to all carriers operating at SLCIA by allowing reduced thrust departures. The EA is required by NEPA and represents the first phase of the Runway 16L-34R Extension program which includes several enabling projects. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 N/A November 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $1,700,000 $250,000 $1,950,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $1,500,000 $450,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 64 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Taxiway U Bridges Project Description: The Taxiway U project is the second bid package in the Taxiways U and V program. This phase completes the superstructures for three bridge structures beneath Taxiway U and constructs a portion of Taxiway U between Taxiways A and B. Work elements include installation of bridge girders and bridge deck, concrete pavement and associated pavement sections, in-pavement centerline and taxiway edge lights with underground cabling and connectors, updated airfield signage, pavement markings, and related earthwork and structural concrete. Project Justification: The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified Taxiways U and V as a new cross field taxiway system between the north cargo support area and existing concourses. Currently Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway connections between Runways 16R/34L and 16L/34R and the terminal area. The construction of Taxiways U and V will provide alternative taxi routes to improve aircraft circulation and overall airfield efficiency and safety, particularly during snow removal operations on Taxiways E and F. This project will provide an immediate benefit to the flow of aircraft on the airfield as well as improving safety by reducing traffic in a very congested area on the airfield. With current passenger numbers already approaching 2019 numbers and the airlines expecting to increase operations at SLCIA, there is a need to expand the airfield capacity. Additionally, the new taxiway system will allow for future maintenance to occur on Taxiways E and F as well as provide an enabling project for a future Concourse C. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 July 2027 October 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $18,000,000 $860,000 $360,000 $1,000 $779,000 $20,000,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $15,000,000 $5,000,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 65 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Taxiway E&F Rehabilitation (F3-F5) - (Design Only) Project Description: This project is part of the ongoing efforts to maintain the Airport’s infrastructure. Work will include rehabilitating and, if necessary, replacing spalled panels and joints on Taxiways E and F between F3 and F5. The scope includes installing new PCCP panels to bring the taxiway shoulders and tapers into compliance with current FAA design standards. Additional work includes selective demolition of existing pavement and econocrete base, placement of new econocrete, portland cement concrete, diamond grinding, and spall and joint repairs. Project Justification: Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway system that connect Runways 16R-34L and 16L-34R with the terminal area, serving as the primary taxi route for arriving and departing aircraft. Due to this high traffic volume, the pavement panels are experiencing distress and are projected to require rehabilitation within the next five years. This project will address those deficiencies by upgrading the pavement to current FAA Advisory Circular standards, while also enhancing safety and capacity by preserving taxiway integrity and reducing the potential for Foreign Object Debris (FOD). Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 N/A October 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $643,000 $643,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $643,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 66 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:State Hangar Taxilane Project Description: This project is for site development to allow for the State of Utah's aeronautical activities including the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Utah Highway Patrol (UHP), and Civil Air Patrol (CAP). Work includes design and construction of a new taxilane to the site, the realignment of the existing perimeter roadway, and any utility infrastructure that remains to be run to the lease line. Project Justification: North and west of the Boeing Facility is a tract of land that has been undevelopable for 38 years as Boeing has a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) to develop it. Airport Properties has negotiated a take back of approximately 20 acres immediately west of the Boeing facility which will accommodate a much needed aeronautical development with airfield connectivity. This work is necessary to enable aeronautical developments on property that is unencumbered by agreements and will result in additional revenue to the SLCDA. The project enables the SLCDA to house the State of Utah in one area, enabling the Airport to demolish and redevelop existing State properties. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 April 2027 October 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $718,600 $115,900 $14,200 $7,400 $143,900 $1,000,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $1,000,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 67 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:SVRA Contract Tower (Siting Study Only) Project Description: The recent Master Plan conducted for South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA) has identified that the design and construction of a modern and efficient control tower at SVRA is essential for the safe and smooth management of air traffic operations. This project is for the funding necessary once the NEPA process and a Siting Study, as required by the FAA, have been completed. Project Justification: Airports with similar airspace challenges as South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA) generally have an Airport Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) if they have more than 200 based aircraft and/or 80,000 operations. SVR has approximately 100,000 annual operations and 177-based aircraft. Based on a conversation with the FAA Airport District Office (ADO), SVRA has exceeded the eligibility benchmarks and needs to begin planning for this tower. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 April 2027 October 2028 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $34,248,000 $4,560,000 $342,000 $2,740,000 $8,510,000 $50,400,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $32,107,500 $18,292,500 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 68 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:3700 W Reconstruction & Improvements (Design Only) Project Description: This project will reconstruct 3700 W between the Airport Operations Building (AOB) and the Airport OperationsCenter (AOC) and incorporate a new shared use path for bicycles, scooters, and pedestrians to more safely accessthe terminal. Reconstruction will include rehabilitation of the existing base and a new concrete riding surface tosupport long term durability and increased bike and pedestrian traffic. The project will also upgrade sidewalks and walkways, add bike markings, and include restriping the road segment north of Gate 13 where bicycles and scooters will share the travel lanes with vehicles. Pedestrians will continue along existing sidewalks and use designated crosswalks across the TRAX line. Project Justification: The existing pavement along 3700 W is in failing condition, with PCI ratings of 27 and 28, largely due to the use ofheavy construction traffic during the ARP program. The roadway also has a history of accidents involving bicyclesand scooters, reflecting ongoing safety concerns as multiple modes of travel interact in a constrained space. Withthe opening of the South Employee Parking Lot and continued growth in airport staffing, use of this route bypedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles will increase. A combined approach to reconstruct the roadway and introduce adedicated shared use path will reduce conflict between users, improve safety, and ensure the long term reliability of this critical access corridor. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 April 2027 October 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $4,637,000 $617,000 $93,000 $200,000 $1,159,000 $6,706,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $6,706,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 69 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Rental Car QTA Car Wash Equipment Replacement Project Description: This project will replace the car wash equipment for twelve (12) car washes inside the car rental Quick Turn Around (QTA) facility. The QTA has been operational since March 2016 and the car wash equipment is wearing out, beginning to fail, and repairs are costly. This project would be a total equipment change out to provide new equipment at each wash bay. The current pressure washers in the wash bays will be replaced with new water cannons to eliminate the need for car wash prep stations. Project Justification: The car washes in the QTA are heavily used and nearing the end of their useful life. Repairs to the system have been frequently needed and costly. The car wash systems in the QTA are essential for the operation of rental car companies at the Salt Lake City Airport. When these systems need repairs or are unusable, it increases the amount of time needed to process a returned car and results in slower service for customers. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 March 2027 September 2027 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $3,326,000 $400,000 $34,000 $998,000 $4,758,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $4,758,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 70 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Rental Car Reallocation Phase II & Equipment Project Description: Project includes various improvements to enable new rental car lease separations as a result of the recent rental car solicitation, including: relocation of SE stair tower at the QTA; barricade, security gate and other equipment relocations throughout the garage and QTA; demising walls and improvements at the RSS sites, etc; improvements and dividing lots at the overflow rental car area by the Parking Spot, etc. Project Justification: New lease areas require improvements to the various areas that the rental cars lease for the recent solicitation to allow efficient operations for the duration of the new agreements commencing 7-1-2026. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 August 2026 December 2026 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $4,141,000 $500,000 $38,700 $34,600 $485,700 $5,200,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $5,200,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 71 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:S Employee Parking Lot Development Program - Phase II Canal Relocation Project Description: This project is Phase 2 of a program that will implement a series of projects over the next 5 years that will allow for the development of the Southern Open Space into an employee parking lot as shown on the new SLCIA Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Phase 1 of this program designed the relocation of the surplus canal and began construction on the new South Employee Parking Lot. Phase 2 of this project will mitigate the wetlands and relocate the canal to the south, parallel to the existing TRAX line. Phase 3 will be to complete the design and build the balance of the infrastructure, parking lot, and roadways. Phase 4 will construct an employee screening facility required to operate the South Employee Parking Lot. Project Justification: The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified that a new employee parking lot will be needed toaccommodate the forecasted increase in employee numbers at the airport. The existing South Employee ParkingLot will be reutilized to accommodate the forecasted increase in passenger parking. With passenger numbersalready approaching past 2019 numbers and the airlines expecting to increase both their operations and employee numbers at SLCIA, the need to expand parking has been accelerated. There currently is not enough parking to sustain peak days. This program will provide an immediate and long-term parking solution. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2026 January 2027 October 2029 Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion $15,889,600 $2,710,600 $317,800 $1,453,000 $1,589,000 $21,960,000 AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds $21,960,000 PROJECT LOCATION Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects 72 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 The Salt Lake City Golf Division The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by user fees. The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past five years and is able to begin re-investing funds into long-overdue projects. In addition, for the FY22 budget the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects. The Golf Division has budgeted $16,610,000 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY27. The Golf Division is in the middle of a multi-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee box areas at each course and has allocated $175,000 in FY26 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division will undergo a major project installing a new irrigation system at the Rose Park golf course $7,500,000 and Nibley Park golf course $3,000,000. The Golf Division will look to build a new clubhouse at Nibley Park with potential public/private partnership with multiple industry and community partners and have allocated $2,500,000 for their potential share in this project. Other significant projects include new maintenance buildings at Bonneville and Rose Park, on-course restroom at Glendale and a new roof at Rose Park. As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $777,321 in FY27 to purchase additional equipment. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 73 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Tee Box Leveling Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing tee box leveling at all 6 courses ($175,000). Salt Lake City customer satisfaction surveys and course evaluation initiatives have shown that the biggest area of needed improvement is the condition of the tee boxes. This is an area where course labor can be utilized to perform a large portion of the work. The Golf Division proposes utilizing Golf CIP funds to pay for needed equipment and supplies. Each course will undertake a four-year plan to address tee box leveling of existing tee boxes and to begin construction of new forward tee boxes. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Funds $175,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 74 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Pump Replacement Project Address:Glendale Project Description: The Golf Division will be replacing the first of five irrigation pumps at Glendale golf course ($25,000). The replacement of these pumps will take place over a 5-year period. This is the second of 5 pumps that are nearing their life expectancy. At any time if one of these pumps goes down it will have impact on our ability to irrigate the golf course. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Replacement Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Funds $25,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 75 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Maintenance Equipment Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses Project Description: As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $777,321 in FY27 to purchase additional used equipment (usually lease-return equipment from high-end private courses). The plan would be to purchase equipment if available such as Reelmaster, Groundsmaster, Greensmaster. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Equipment Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf Operating Fund $777,321 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 76 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Irrigation Improvements Project Address:Nibley Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing irrigation improvements at Nibley Park ($3,000,000). The current mainline system is as old as 65 years and is in desperate need of replacement. This project also includes a turfgrass reduction plan and some redesign of certain holes to allow for a more efficient system, utilizing fewer heads and potential water use reduction of up to 40%. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $3,000,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 77 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Irrigation Improvements Project Address:Rose Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing irrigation improvements at Rose Park ($7,500,000). The current mainline system is as old as 65 years and is in desperate need of replacement. This project also includes a turfgrass reduction plan and some redesign of certain holes to allow for a more efficient system, utilizing fewer heads and potential water use reduction of up to 40%. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $7,500,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 78 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Cart Path Improvements Project Address:Rose Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing cart path improvements at Rose Park golf course ($150,000). Well-maintained golf cart paths are critical for the overall customer experience and for helping to preserve golf course playing conditions. The existing paths are decades behind receiving proper repair and expansion. Additionally, with slight modifications, many cart paths can be used by non-golfers during the off season or other times when conditions are not ideal for golf. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $150,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 79 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Roof Repair Project Address:Rose Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be replacing the roof at Rose Park ($260,000). Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $260,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 80 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Driving Range Redesign Project Address:Rose Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing the next phase of the driving range redesign ($100,000). The first phase was the fencing along redwood, disk golf course and Jordan river trail. The next phase of the project consists of new hitting pads, a redesigned practice putting and chipping area. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $100,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 81 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:On Course Restroom Project Address:Glendale Project Description: The Golf Division will be doing an on-course restroom at Glendale ($150,000). This course doesn’t have a permanent restroom structure on the course. It is a highly requested amenity by customers. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $150,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 82 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Maintenance Buildings Project Address:Bonneville, Rose Park Project Description: The Golf Division will be building new maintenance buildings for Bonneville and Rose Park golf courses ($1,000,000). Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $1,000,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 83 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Deferred Maintenance Project Address:All 6 Courses Project Description: The Golf Division needs money set aside for emergency deferred maintenance that is frequent now with the age of multiple golf clubhouses ($250,000). Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $250,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 84 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Deferred Maintenance Project Address:Mountain Dell Project Description: The Golf Division project is for the Lake Course Culvert repair and hillside stabilization ($1,500,000). This project includes Public Utilities oversight. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $1,500,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 85 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Deferred Maintenance Project Address:Nibley Clubhouse/Partnership Project Description: The Golf Division project is for a new clubhouse at Nibley Park, which will have additional uses by potential industry and community partners. The current clubhouse is in major need and likely not worth patching up. This will likely include a public/private partnership. The final amount will include partner matching funds/joint fundraising to generate funds necessary to design and construct the project. Proposal ID: Department:Public Lands - Golf Project Type:Improvements Category: Capital Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Golf CIP Fund $2,500,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets. Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects 86 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 The Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities, water, sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each operates as an independent enterprise fund, meaning they are not supported by tax dollars. Instead, funding comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue bonds, and occasionally grants or subsidized loans from state or federal sources. To support major infrastructure investments, SLCDPU is utilizing a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility construction. Additionally, a Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant is supporting the City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction. Utility rates, set based on cost-of-service analysis, ensure that customers pay for the services they receive. Given the infrastructure-heavy nature of these utilities, SLCDPU relies on a long-term project and financing strategy to effectively manage its assets. The capital budget is organized by fund, with detailed cost centers under each. For Fiscal Year 2027, SLCDPU is managing over 95 capital projects across its four utility funds, in addition to ongoing projects. Many capital projects span multiple fiscal years – often designed in one year and built in the next. The budget prioritizes high-need projects identified through the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The largest project underway is the replacement of the Water Reclamation Facility, with estimated completion in Fiscal Year 2027. Other system components are also aging and will require increased investment in the coming years. For instance, SLCDPU’s three water treatment plants, built in the 1950s and early 1960s, are due for major updates. The City Creek Water Treatment Plant reconstruction is scheduled for completion in 2027, while planning is underway for two remaining plants. SLCDPU’s capital planning is shaped by a complex mix of federal, state, and local regulations, as well as water rights and exchange agreement obligations – all of which influence project priorities and timeline. Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 87 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Water Main Replacements Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The Water Main Replacement Projects replaces aging and failing water pipelines to improve system reliability, reduce water main breaks, and maintain consistent water service for residents. In FY27, projects include the Kearns Line Replacement, Heughs Canyon Neighborhood Water Main Replacement, 1140 East Water Main Replacement, Olympus Splendor Water Line Replacement, Parkview Drive Water Main Replacement, 11th Avenue Waterline Replacement, Cheyenne Street Water Line Replacement, and the R18 Pressure Reducing Valve Replacement. Many of these pipes have experienced repeated breaks, corrosion, or pressure limitations, and several were originally installed decades ago. These projects replace aging infrastructure, improve system capacity and fire-flow capability where needed, and help ensure safe and reliable drinking water delivery throughout Salt Lake City. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $23,185,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 88 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Treatment Plant Improvements Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Salt Lake City’s Water Treatment Plant Improvements Projects invest in planning and upgrading for the long-term replacement of the City’s drinking water treatment facilities. All three city-owned water treatment plants (WTPs), originally built in the 1950's and early 1960's, are approaching the end of their operational life and require upgrades, emergency repairs, or long-term replacement planning to meet modern safety, reliability, and water quality standards. These investments help ensure Salt Lake City can continue delivering safe, high-quality drinking water while preparing for the future rebuilding of critical treatment facilities. In FY27, projects include Water Plants Compliance Projects (Annual), Treatment Plant Upgrades, City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades – CM/GC, City Creek Treatment Plant Upgrades – Public Engagement, Parleys Water Treatment Plant Raw Water Intake & Priority Improvements, Parleys Water Treatment Plant Rebuild – Alternatives Analysis, Big Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant Rebuild, Salt Lake Aqueduct Replacement – Cottonwoods Connection, and Emergency Big Cottonwood Water Treatment Plant Screenings and Solids Collector Replacement. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $48,800,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Estimated operational increase of $500,000 per/year (City Creek) Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 89 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Deep Pump Wells; Pumping Plants and Pump Houses Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Deep pump wells projects maintain and upgrade the City’s well facilities to ensure reliable groundwater supplies and safe drinking water. In FY27, projects include the 4800 South Well Roof Replacement, Artesian 1 Well Project, and 1300 East Well Chlorination. Final design is planned for the 3900 South Pump Station. These projects address needed repairs to well facilities, improvements to treatment systems, and upgrades that help maintain regulatory compliance and protect water quality. Together, these investments help ensure the City’s groundwater sources remain safe, reliable, and available to supplement Salt Lake City’s drinking water supply. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $1,500,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 90 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Meter Change-Out Program Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The budget includes the continuation of the small meter change out program piloted in 2015 and initiated in 2018. Metering water consumption by customers is the source of our revenue. Approximately 55,000, or 68%, of the system’s water meters have been replaced with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) read meters. With optimal conditions, 10,000 to 12,000 meters per year can be replaced. Supply chain issues have created delays thus replacement is planned at 8,000 meters per year. The plan is to complete the residential AMI meter change out program in the next 2 ½ to 3 years. AMI technology provides hourly usage information instead of relying on monthly data. An online portal provides our customers with information to better manage their water usage and alerts them to the status of their water service. Better information will assist us in water conservation efforts. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $4,000,000 Priority: Ongoing program Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 91 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Water Service Connections Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Water service extends beyond the corporate boundaries of Salt Lake City. Approximately 37% of our service connections are in this outlying area. Repair and replacement of these connections are part of an ongoing program. The components of this program are service line replacements, new connections, and small and large meter maintenance and replacement. Public Utilities is proceeding to implement the EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) by performing inventories, sampling plans, public outreach, and lateral service line replacements. The plan will include resources, personnel, and capital needs. Budget associated with the LCRR includes $2,000,000 to support pothole work associated with inventory development and service line material identification. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $5,250,000 Priority: Project/need specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Estimated operational increase of $100,000 per year associated with LCRR line replacement and temporary filters. Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 92 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Storage Reservoirs Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: SLCDPU owns and operates seven raw water reservoirs that store snow run-off. Little Dell and five of SLCDPU’s reservoirs are used to store water that is treated for drinking water. All seven of the reservoirs are a contingent way for the Department to meet exchange agreements for secondary water. Three of the reservoirs are used by ski areas for snowmaking, and three of the reservoirs are used for flood control. In FY27, projects include Mountain Dell Dam Concrete Repairs and Little Dell Dam Outlet Pipe Coating Restoration. These projects address aging infrastructure, including deteriorating concrete and failed protective coatings, to prevent further damage and maintain structural integrity. These investments help meet state safety requirements and ensure the long-term reliability of the City’s water storage system. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $1,150,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 93 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Culverts, Flumes & Bridges Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The secondary water conveyance systems are critical to maintaining our water exchange agreements. In FY27, Culverts, Flumes, and Bridges includes the Replace Flume/Auto Dump and JSL Canal Enclosure at Millcreek Project, which will replace a deteriorating flume, install new automated controls, and improve access for operations and maintenance. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $1,500,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 94 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks) Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: SLCDPU has over 100,000,000 gallons of finished water storage in 22 tanks and reservoirs. These components require on-going inspection and maintenance. The location and elevation of these facilities is critical to the operation of the water distribution system. In FY27, work will include Distribution Tank and Reservoir Paving (Annual), Tanner Reservoir Valve Replacement, Tanner Reservoir Replacement, Eastwood North Tank Interior Coating, and Perry Hollow Tank Accessibility and Improvements. These projects address aging infrastructure, including deteriorating tank coatings, failing valves, poor site access, and needed safety and operational upgrades. Together, these investments help extend the life of storage facilities, improve system reliability, and ensure safe and efficient operations across Salt Lake City’s water system. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $4,325,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 95 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility) Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The Maintenance & Repair Shops Project focuses on modernizing and upgrading Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities facilities to support efficient operations and a safe working environment. In FY27, this includes the first phase of the DPU New Campus Project, which will fund the design, renovation, and construction of a new maintenance yard and improvements to existing buildings. This project will help relocate staff, reduce operational congestion, and improve coordination between divisions. These investments address aging facilities and capacity limitations while supporting long-term operational efficiency and service delivery. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $24,000,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design. Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 96 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Treatment Plants (Sewer Utility) Project Address:1365 West 2300 North, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Project Description: The Treatment Plans category focuses on maintaining, upgrading, and replacing the critical Water Reclamation Facility infrastructure to ensure reliable operations and compliance with environmental regulations. In FY27, projects include the 5th Rotary Drum Thickener, Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Upgrades (Annual), East Maintenance Building Remodel, Cogen Integration to New Facility, Digester Control Building Declassification Phase II, and multiple components of the New Water Reclamation Facility Program, including design services, capital project support, public outreach, construction, and related documentation and commissioning efforts. These projects increase system capacity, improve reliability, support energy efficiency through reuse of digester gas, and advance the design and construction of a new facility to meet future regulatory requirements. Together, these investments help ensure the City can continue providing effective wastewater treatment while preparing for long-term system needs. The existing plant improvements are critical to maintaining existing operations while the new water reclamation facility is commissioned. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $19,021,603 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: The operational cost of the wastewater treatment facility is anticipated to increase by $6,000,000 annually, or by approximately 40%, with the completion of the New WRF project. This increase in operational costs is associated with increased chemical, power, and other miscellaneous operational costs attributed to the new treatment process. This estimate will be refined as construction progresses. Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 97 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Collection Lines Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: SLCDPU has over 667 miles of aging sewer collections pipelines. The Collection Lines Program focuses on maintaining, repairing, and upgrading Salt Lake City’s sewer system to ensure reliable wastewater conveyance and prevent backups or failures. In FY27, projects include Miscellaneous Public Services Projects (Annual), 1% Per Year Sewer Rehabilitation/System Renewal (Annual), 1200 West Trunk Line Rehabilitation, Emery Street Replacement and Upsize, Emergent Operational Support Projects (Annual), Maintenance Access (Manhole) Rehabilitation Program, Developer Contributions and Emergency Projects, SharePoint Project Delivery Support, Water Fill Stations, Development Services Contributions, and the 200 East Sewer Upsizing Project. These projects address aging and deteriorating infrastructure, increase system capacity to support growth, and fund both planned and emergency repairs across the collection system. Together, these investments help protect public health, reduce the risk of sewer overflows, and ensure the long-term reliability of the City’s wastewater system. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $14,285,162 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 98 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Storm Drain Lines Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The SLCDPU owns and maintains over 350 miles of storm drain in the system. The Storm Drain Lines category focuses on upgrading and expanding Salt Lake City’s storm drainage system to reduce flooding, improve water quality, and support growth. In FY27, projects include the Lee Drain Culvert Replacement, Lake Street Storm Drain Improvements, 700 North Storm Drain Improvements, 1700 East Storm Drain Replacement, Local Streets Storm Drain Projects, Green Loop Stormwater Improvements, Surplus Canal Encroachment Corrections, Cleanout Box Rehabilitation, Underdrain Improvements, Development Services Contributions, and SharePoint Project Delivery Support. These projects address undersized and aging infrastructure, increase system capacity, incorporate low-impact development features, and ensure compliance with federal floodplain and water quality requirements. Together, these investments help reduce flood risk, improve neighborhood drainage, and protect waterways throughout the city. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $5,152,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 99 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Riparian Corridor Improvements Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The city places a high value on protecting its riparian corridors and SLCDPU serves as a steward to those corridors. The planned riparian project for FY 2027 is Emigration –Allen Park. This funding will support construction of planned Allen Park improvements. These efforts are to be coordinated with overall capital improvement efforts by the city to open and activate Allen Park to the public. Project will consider streambank and channel stabilization, culvert removal, emergent benches, and debris basins. In addition, funding will be provided to paint a mural at the Cornell Wetlands Area. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $450,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 100 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Landscaping Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Stormwater landscaping provides an important role to water quality and the aesthetic value of the city. The landscaping budget includes $50,000 for the Northwest Oil Drain canal remediation. This Northwest Oil Drain budget is to reserve funding for cleanup and closeout on the remediated portions of the Northwest Drain. The Cornell Wetlands Revegetation project is to eliminate invasive vegetation and revegetate open areas of the Cornell Wetland area with hardy, open-space vegetation. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $50,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 101 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Storm Water Lift Stations Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: The Stormwater Utility manages 26 stormwater lift stations. These projects maintain and improving critical lift station infrastructure to ensure effective stormwater management and reduce flood risk. In FY27, projects include the 900 North and City Drain Lift Station Improvements and the Northwest Drain Lift Station Debris Boom Installation. These projects improve system reliability, enhance debris management, and ensure lift stations can operate effectively during storm events. Together, these investments help protect nearby neighborhoods and waterways by maintaining proper stormwater flow and reducing the risk of flooding. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $766,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 102 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Detention Basins Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Stormwater detention basins serve a critical role in managing storms and mitigating associated flooding. This project focuses on improving stormwater capacity, reducing flood risk, and enhancing water quality through natural and engineered solutions. In FY27, this project includes pre-design of the Northwest Drain Treatment Wetlands Project, which will create a large detention and treatment wetland system connected to the Northwest Drain. This project will help reduce flooding in nearby neighborhoods, improve stormwater quality before it reaches the Great Salt Lake, and provide added environmental and community benefits such as habitat and educational opportunities. Together, these investments support a more resilient stormwater system while improving water quality and environmental outcomes for Salt Lake City. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund Enterprise Funds: $80,000 Priority: Project specific Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Negligible Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 103 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Street Lighting Projects Project Address:Various Locations Project Description: Street lighting projects planned for FY2027 are budgeted for $1,240,000 to upgrade to high efficiency lighting and other system improvements on arterial streets, collector streets, and in neighborhoods. This includes budget to hire a contractor to perform inspections on new street lighting facilities, consultant support to further develop an Implementation Plan, and budget for improvements for base level lighting services and three enhanced lighting groups. The master plan developed with the implementation plan determines and guides best practices for upgrades and new lights. A smart controller pilot project is contemplated for $200,000. Proposal ID: Department:Public Utilities Project Type: Category: Street Lighting Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Funds Enterprise Funds: $1,440,000 Priority: Ongoing program Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Reduction in electricity costs. Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects 104 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency The Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency (CRA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The CRA utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The CRA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account. The CRA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure projects. As part of the CRA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent on the CRA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval. The CRA fiscal year 2027 budget process proposes three potential City infrastructure projects: •Japantown Art: Designates an additional $100,000 for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art installations recommended in the Japantown Design Strategy that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors. •Civic Center: Allocates an additional $2,200,000 to provide climate friendly investment in shade, walkability, and economic development to attract families, workers, and visitors. The initiative aims to beautify the area and provide more green space to be enjoyed by all. •500 West Improvements: Provides an additional $3,300,000 to be used for beautification elements on 500 West from 600 South to 900 South. Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects 105 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Japantown Art Project Address:Block 67 North Project Area Project Description: Appropriation of funds for the Japantown Art project, totaling $ 100,000. The funding is designated for enhancing the cultural landscape through various art installations that celebrate and preserve Japantown’s heritage. The initiative aims to beautify the neighborhood and provide an engaging artistic experience for both residents and visitors. Proposal ID: Department:CRA Project Type: Category: Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund (CRA)$100,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects 106 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Civic Center Project Address:CBD Project Area Project Description: Appropriation of funds for the Civic Center enhancements project totaling $2.2M. The funding is allocated for the design of more green space, shade, and economic development for all. The initiative aims to beautify Utah’s capital city to attract families, workers, and visitors. Proposal ID: Department:CRA Project Type: Category: Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund (CRA)$2,200,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects 107 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:500 West Improvements Project Address:Granary District Project Area Project Description: Appropriation of funds for the 500 West Improvements project totaling $3.3M. The funding will be used for beautification elements on 500 West from 600 South to 900 South. Proposal ID: Department:CRA Project Type: Category: Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council General Fund (CRA)$3,300,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Salt Lake City CRA Capital Projects 108 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 The Salt Lake City Sustainability Department Sustainability’s Energy & Environment Division supports other departments to minimize the environmental impact of City operations. The Energy & Environment Division does not have any proposed projects for FY 26-27. The Waste & Recycling Division has one project proposed to construct a shelter for container maintenance operations that occur at the Delong Street Operations Yard. Salt Lake City Sustainability Capital Projects 109 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 Project Title:Delong Street Operations Yard Improvement Project Address:500 Delong St, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 Project Description: Constructing a metal structure to provide shelter for container maintenance operations. Proposal ID: Department:Sustainability - Refuse Fund Project Type:Capital Category: Funding Recommendations CDCIP Board Mayor Council Refuse Fund $250,000 Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense: Maintenance requirements are expected to be minimal, limited to cleaning, regular pest control, and periodic inspections for rust and loose bolts, and applying primer or paint to prevent rusting. Salt Lake City Sustainability Capital Projects 110 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND Fiscal Years 2027-2032 Salt Lake City, Utah CAPITALINVESTMENT NEEDS TOTAL OVER SIX YEARS $1.5 billion REPAIR & REPLACE IMPROVE EXISTING 3.7% | $56.4 million BUILD NEW 37.9% | $569.9 million 58.4% | $876.6 million CAPITAL ASSET long-lasting investments, costing $50,000 or more, that help deliver essential services and public beneﬁts across the City Executive Summary Salt Lake City invests in the infrastructure that supports daily life, including streets, bridges, buildings, parks, and public spaces. These long-term investments, known as capital assets, are funded each year through the Capital Improvement Program, or CIP. Examples include street reconstruction projects, park improvements, public safety facilities, public art and upgrades to sidewalks and traffic signals. This Capital Asset Plan (the Plan) for the General Fund builds on the annual CIP process by providing a multi-year roadmap for how the City will maintain, improve, and expand infrastructure over time. By planning ahead, the City can identify capital needs earlier and make more informed, cost-effective decisions. Over the six-year planning horizon, the City identified approximately $1.5 billion in capital investments across all capital asset types in the General Fund. Of this total, about $876.6 million is needed to repair and replace existing infrastructure, $56.4 million to improve existing capital assets, and $569.9 million to build new capital assets. These estimates highlight the scale of investment required to maintain current service levels while preparing for future growth. The Plan focuses on capital assets paid for by the General Fund, which deliver core services used across the community. It balances three key priorities: maintaining existing capital assets, improving existing capital assets, and investing in new capital assets. • Maintaining capital assets may include projects like repairing streets, replacing aging playground equipment, or a roof replacement. • Improving existing capital assets may include projects like upgrading building systems such as security systems or seismic retrofits and improving accessibility. • New investments may include building new facilities, new amenities in parks, or adding new infrastructure like protected bike lanes to transportation corridors. Each year, the Plan is updated to reflect changing conditions and priorities. City teams evaluate capital asset conditions, such as the quality of pavement, the age of buildings, or the performance of irrigation systems in parks, to determine when repairs or replacements are needed. This work results in a six-year list of planned projects, organized into CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 1 250 Works of Art PUBLIC ARTS maintaining capital assets, improving or expanding existing infrastructure, and building new capital assets. The Plan works closely with the annual CIP process, which evaluates and funds projects each year. CIP projects may be proposed by City departments or submitted by community members. Examples of constituent requests include neighborhood traffic calming measures or park improvements. It should be noted constituent requests are not included in the Plan. The CIP projects are reviewed by City staff and advisory boards before sharing recommendations with the Mayor and then revised and approved by the City Council through a public process. Funding decisions are guided by clear priorities, including maintaining existing infrastructure, improving safety, meeting legal requirements, and supporting community needs. For example, projects that address failing infrastructure, improve pedestrian safety, or meet accessibility requirements are often prioritized. The Plan and CIP process strengthens coordination across City departments. An internal committee with representatives from most city departments, known as the CAP Committee, reviews the Plan and recommends internal CIP applications each year. This strong coordination helps align project timing, funding strategies, design decisions, and construction schedules so related work can move forward together. This approach allows multiple projects, such as street reconstruction, utility upgrades, accessibility and sidewalk improvements, to be completed at the same time, reducing disruption to a neighborhood and saving taxpayers’ money. Capital projects are funded through a combination of ongoing and one-time sources. Ongoing sources, such as General Fund transfers and dedicated sales taxes like Funding Our Future, typically support recurring needs like street capital maintenance, but can support improvements or new growth- related projects. One-time sources, such as grants and bonds, can support capital maintenance projects and larger investments, such as new buildings, major road improvements, or park development. The Plan is supported by City policies, master plans, and technical studies, ensuring that investments reflect community priorities and long-term goals. It is reviewed and updated each year and presented to the City Council as part of the annual budget process. Together, this approach helps Salt Lake City invest responsibly in its infrastructure, maintain reliable services, and plan in a way that is transparent, coordinated, and aligned with community needs. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND2 60 City Buildings 16 Fire Buildings 6 Police Buildings 52 EV Charging Stations 1,500 Lane Miles of Roads 195 Street Signals 900 Miles of Sidewalks 11,920 Curb Ramps 146 Miles of Bikeways 55 Miles of Alleys 2,711 Acres of Park Space 203 Sport Courts 63 Athletic Fields 79 Playgrounds 44 Pavilions 39 Restrooms 135 Miles of Trails 47 Miles of Bike Trails TRANSPORTATION PARKS BUILDINGS COST TO MAINTAIN EXISTING CAPITAL ASSETS $688,200,00 $111,500,000 $76,900,000 COST TO IMPROVE EXISTING CAPITAL ASSETS $51,200,000 $5,200,000 COST OF NEW CAPITAL ASSETS $279,400,000 $254,300,000 $36,100,000 COMBINED COST $1,018,900,000 $371,000,000 $113,000,000 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 3 Capital Asset Plan – General Fund Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 6-year Capital Asset Plan 7 Data Collection and Review 8 Transparency and Reporting 9 One-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – Annual Process Overview 10 Budget Funding/Project Life Cycle 11 Funding Priorities 12 Capital Asset Plan Roles and Partnerships 13 Funding Sources 16 City Policies, Master Plans, and Other Qualifying Studies 19 Existing Capital Asset Project Descriptions – Capital Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement 21 Appendices 25 Appendix I Annual CIP Budget–Project Lists 26 Appendix II 6-year Expenditure Projection 57 Appendix III Analytics Reports 60 Appendix IV List of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances, - Master Plans and Qualifying Technical Studies 63 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND4 GENERAL FUND City’s main operating fund used to support the basic services, personnel costs, facilities, and public infrastructure that serve the community each day. Introduction Salt Lake City invests in the infrastructure that supports daily life. This plan only covers the capital assets in the City’s General Fund, which largely includes our streets, bridges, buildings, parks, and public systems. Other types of capital assets are managed separate from the General Fund including the Airport, Public Utilities, and Waste & Recycling among others. Each year, investments in these capital assets are funded through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which focuses on major construction projects. These capital assets are long-lasting investments, costing $50,000 or more, that help deliver essential services and public benefits across the City. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 5 The Capital Asset Plan (the Plan) builds on this annual process by looking ahead. It is a multi-year roadmap that outlines how the City will build, maintain, and pay for infrastructure over time. By planning beyond a single year, the City can move from a reactive approach to a more proactive and strategic one, identifying needs earlier and making more informed and coordinated decisions. This Plan helps balance competing priorities: maintaining the infrastructure we already have and investing in new projects to serve a growing city. Taking care of existing capital assets extends their useful life and protects past investments, while new projects ensure the City can meet future needs. The Plan also connects the Mayor and City Council’s priorities with the City’s most critical infrastructure needs. While there are always more needs than available funding, bringing them together into one plan supports more transparent and thoughtful decision-making. The Plan also improves coordination across the City and with regional partners. It informs long-term financial planning and helps to align work across departments, including Public Utilities and the Community Reinvestment Agency. It also allows partners like the Utah Transit Authority and Salt Lake County to better coordinate their projects with the City’s plans. For residents and businesses, this can mean fewer disruptions, more efficient construction, and greater overall impact when projects are completed together. The Plan will be reviewed and updated each year to reflect changing needs, economic conditions, and community priorities—ensuring Salt Lake City continues to invest wisely in its future. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND6 CAPITAL ASSETS Buildings Streets Parks Public Spaces Other Major Infrastructure 6-Year Capital Asset Plan The Plan focuses on infrastructure owned by the City’s General Fund, which supports core public services. These capital assets include buildings, streets, parks, public spaces, and other major infrastructure funded primarily through taxes. Unlike services that are funded by user fees, such as utilities, these investments support services used broadly across the community and benefit residents and visitors citywide. The Plan is a living document that is updated each year to reflect the City’s evolving needs and priorities. This information supports better planning, helps prioritize limited resources, and ensures public capital assets remain safe and reliable. Updates include progress on current projects, changes in the condition of capital assets, and new or emerging infrastructure needs. Evaluating how capital assets such as streets, buildings, and parks are performing helps the City determine how long they are expected to last and when maintenance, rehabilitation, or replacement may be needed. The Plan also reflects priorities set by elected officials and updates to City policies, ordinances, or procedures that affect how projects are funded and delivered. Each year, the Plan is submitted along with the Mayor’s Recommended Budget to the City Council on the first Tuesday in May. The Council reviews and adopts the Plan alongside the annual Capital Improvement Program budget by September 1, in accordance with Utah Code. The Plan guides which projects move forward into the annual CIP, ensuring that short-term investments align with long-term priorities. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 7 Each year from September through December, City teams work together to prepare and update the Plan. Data is provided to Finance’s CAP Team by Community & Neighborhoods, Public Services and Public Lands departments. The teams review existing infrastructure data, update project information, and identify future needs. The data collected provides an estimate of the annual funding needed to maintain current service levels. The departments also develop and refine a six-year list of planned projects, which helps the CAP Team develop a citywide prioritization of investments and plan for the future. Projects in the Plan fall into three categories: • Existing Capital Assets – Capital Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement. These projects focus on maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing capital assets that are already in service. The goal is to sustain current service levels, preserve capital asset conditions, extend useful life, reduce the risk of failure, and protect prior public investment. • Improvements to Capital Assets – These projects improve or upgrade existing capital assets beyond their current condition. They are intended to enhance service delivery, improve safety and accessibility, respond to operational needs, and increase the overall performance and usefulness of the capital assets. • New Capital Assets – These projects create or acquire new City capital assets, expand existing capital assets beyond their current capacity to meet growing demand, expand public access, support development, or advance strategic priorities. These investments help ensure the City can serve both current and future residents and future needs. Data Collection and Review CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND8 YEAR1 Updated Each Year Review & Update the Plan Presented to Mayor & City Council City Council Considers & Adopts ANNUAL PLAN UPDATE & ADOPTION Project Progress Capital Asset Conditions Maintenance & Replacement Needs Revisions to Six-Year Project List WHAT THE ANNUAL UPDATE INCLUDES Strengthens Accountability Builds Public Trust Supports Informed Decision-Making Investments Reﬂect Community Needs WHY REGULAR REPORTING MATTERS Project Status Changes Funding Updates Other Impacting Factors ADDITIONAL UPDATES AS NEEDED Capital Asset Conditions Transparency and Reporting To support transparency and informed decision-making, the Plan is updated each year and presented to the Mayor and City Council as part of the City’s regular capital planning and budgeting process. The annual update includes project progress, information on capital asset conditions, updated maintenance and replacement needs, and revisions to the six-year project list. The City Council has the opportunity to consider and adopt an updated Plan each year. Additional updates may be shared throughout the year, as needed, to highlight significant changes in project status, funding, capital asset conditions, or other factors that may affect implementation of the Plan. Regular reporting strengthens accountability, builds public trust, and helps ensure that capital investment decisions remain clear, consistent, and accessible to the community. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 9 The Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, is the City’s annual process for reviewing, prioritizing, and funding capital projects. CIP is an open and competitive process where community members and City departments submit project proposals. Capital assets must cost at least $50,000 and have a useful life of at least five years. Any capital asset funded with impact fees is required to have a useful life of at least ten years. Each year, the process begins after the previous year’s funding decisions are completed. The City gathers new project ideas by inviting applications from residents and identifying infrastructure needs across departments. Community-submitted projects are reviewed and refined with City staff to develop scope and cost estimates. City staff, through the Capital Asset Planning Committee, evaluate and prioritize internal project proposals utilizing established criteria and master plans. These recommendations are forwarded alongside eligible community-submitted applications to the Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board, which conducts a public review and provides funding recommendations. The Mayor uses these recommendations to develop a proposed CIP budget. Each June, the Council appropriates overall funding available for CIP and approves debt payments and ongoing obligations as part of the annual budget. Over the summer, the Council reviews individual projects and per state law must approve project-specific funding by September 1. This annual process supports transparency, encourages public participation, and helps ensure that funding decisions are coordinated, consistent, and aligned with the City’s long-term priorities. One-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – Annual Process Overview CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND10 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE City Council Approves Funding Public Dollars Dedicated Make Signiﬁcant Progress Within 3 Years Some Projects Take Longer Successful Outcomes for the Community Planning BREAKING LARGE PROJECTS INTO PHASES Phasing helps ensure eﬃcient delivery by spreading work over time, reducing upfront costs, and allowing ﬂexibility as work progresses. Secure FundingDesign ReviewConstruction Repeat for Next Phase(s) as Needed Beneﬁts of Phased Delivery Reduces upfront costs Faster phase timelines Allows ongoing adjustments Improves project alignment Beneﬁts the community When the City Council approves funding for a capital project, those public dollars are dedicated to a specific purpose. Once a project receives funding, it is generally expected to make significant progress within three years, in line with City policy and the CIP framework. Some projects may take longer to complete, especially if they are delivered in multiple phases or receive additional funding over time. Highly complex projects, or those that rely on federal grants or other external sources, may require several years of planning and coordination before construction can begin. Breaking large projects into phases can help ensure efficient delivery. Early phases may focus on planning and design, allowing the City to develop scope and cost estimates before committing to full construction funding. This approach reduces the need for all funding upfront, shortens the timeline for each phase, and provides flexibility to adjust as work progresses. Departments are then able to better coordinate project timing, scope, and funding to support successful outcomes for the community. Budget Funding/Project Life Cycle CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 11 Each year, Salt Lake City receives more capital project requests than available funding. To make thoughtful and transparent decisions, the City uses a set of funding priorities to evaluate and compare projects in the CIP. These priorities, established through City Council Resolution 29 of 2017, help guide how limited resources are invested. They focus on maintaining existing infrastructure, reducing risk, meeting legal obligations, and delivering projects that provide strong public value. Together, they support responsible long-term planning and help ensure that investments align with the City’s needs and community priorities. Projects are evaluated by the internal Capital Asset Planning Committee and the public Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board based on the following considerations: Existing Capital Asset: Projects that maintain, repair, renovate, or replace existing City infrastructure are a top priority. Taking care of capital assets that are already in service helps preserve past investments, extend useful life, and reduce more costly repairs in the future. Critical Capital Asset Failure: Projects that address capital assets at risk of failure receive urgent attention. These include situations that could impact public safety, disrupt essential services, or result in significant financial or operational consequences if not addressed quickly. Legal and Contractual Obligations: Some projects are necessary to meet legal, regulatory, or contractual requirements. Funding these projects ensures the City remains compliant, avoids penalties, and fulfills its commitments. Risk: Life, Health & Safety: Priority is given to projects that address code violations, reduce crime, or improve safety conditions, including efforts to prevent serious injuries and fatalities related to transportation and mobility. Reduce Cost and Increase Efficiency: Projects that lower long-term costs or improve efficiency are prioritized. This may include coordinating work with other projects, reducing maintenance needs, or delivering services more effectively. Balanced Budgeting: Priority is given to internal projects from departments that have received less capital funding in recent years or have greater unmet needs compared to others. This helps ensure a more balanced allocation of limited resources. Resiliency: Projects that strengthen the City’s ability to respond to and recover from disruptions are an important focus. This includes preparing for emergencies, extreme weather, and other risks that could affect infrastructure and services. Project Phase: Projects that are ready to move forward, particularly those transitioning from design to construction, are prioritized to maintain momentum. Advancing projects in a timely manner helps control costs and improves overall delivery. Community Support: Constituent submitted projects that reflect community needs and have support from residents, stakeholders, or Community Councils are an important part of the process. Public input helps ensure investments align with neighborhood priorities. Workforce Support: Internal projects that support the physical, mental or economic well-being of City employees are prioritized, keeping with the Mayor’s goal of supporting “Our City Family.” Sustainability: Projects that support long-term environmental and financial sustainability are encouraged. This includes efforts to improve energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce emissions, and use resources responsibly. Includes Outside Funding: Projects that leverage outside funding, such as grants or partnerships, are prioritized when feasible. These opportunities help stretch City resources and expand the impact of local investments. One City Approach: Internal projects should have coordination among City departments and align with the Mayor’s goals. Community Benefit: Constituent submitted projects that have a high public benefit. Funding Priorities CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND12 Capital Asset Plan Roles and Partnerships The Plan is built through collaboration across City staff, advisory groups, elected officials, and the public. Each group plays a distinct role in identifying needs, evaluating projects, and making funding decisions. Together, these partnerships help ensure that capital planning is transparent, fiscally responsible, and aligned with City priorities. Capital Asset Planning Team The Capital Asset Planning Team, within the Finance Department, oversees the development and maintenance of the Plan. The team coordinates the annual update, identifies funding needs and gaps, and ensures the Plan remains accurate and aligned with City priorities. The team also prepares reports and materials that clearly communicate project status, funding needs, and investment priorities to decision-makers and the public. Departments and Divisions City departments and divisions identify infrastructure needs, propose projects related to existing capital assets and to implement master plans, and provide the technical and operational expertise needed for planning. They help maintain accurate capital asset information, assess risks, and coordinate with the Finance Department on project timing, funding, and readiness. Their input ensures the Plan reflects real service needs across the City. Constituents Community stakeholders help shape capital priorities by both applying for CIP funding through constituent applications and sharing feedback on proposed projects at public meetings. Public input helps the City understand where investments will have the greatest impact and ensures planning reflects the experiences of the community. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 13 Capital Asset Planning Committee (CAP Committee) The CAP Committee brings together representatives from most City departments to review and evaluate internal capital project proposals. The committee helps ensure projects align with City priorities and operational needs and provides recommendations to the CDCIP Board. This collaborative approach supports consistent and informed decision-making across departments. CAP Committee members include the following City representatives (or their respective designees): Economic Development Deputy Director Sustainability Program Manager Community Reinvestment Agency Deputy Director Police Chief of Staff Public Lands’ Planning & Design Division Director Assistant Fire Chief Over Support Deputy Chief Information Officer Public Utilities Deputy Director Finance’s Capital Asset Planning Manager Senior Advisor to Mayor Community & Neighborhoods Deputy Director Public Services Deputy Director Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board (CDCIP Board) The CDCIP Board provides an added level of review and public accountability by evaluating proposed projects, funding needs, and long-term priorities. Their recommendations help inform the City’s CIP budget and support transparency, public awareness, and informed decision-making. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND14 Data, Analysis, & Reporting Reports & Updates Public Input & Feedback Needs, Projects, & Expertise ROLES & PARTNERSHIPS CAPITAL ASSET PLAN Capital Asset Planning Team Constituents • Oversees and updates the plan • Identify funding needs & gaps • Prepares reports Departments & Divisions • Identify infrastructure needs • Provide expertise and insight • Coordinate funding, timing, and readiness • Apply for CIP funding • Share project feedback • Help shape priorities and guide investments CAP Committee Reviews and recommends internal project proposals. City Council Approves funding and adopts the ﬁnal budget. Mayor Sets funding priorities and recommends a budget. CDCIP Board Reviews and recommends projects and funding. EVALUATION & DECISION-MAKING Mayor The Mayor provides leadership and sets priorities for capital funding. Working with City departments and the Finance Department, the Mayor helps ensure the Plan aligns with broader policy goals, operational needs, and long-term strategy. The Mayor reviews the CDCIP Board’s recommendations and may modify them to ensure capital investments reflect community needs, fiscal responsibility, and long-term infrastructure goals. The Mayor then transmits a Recommended CIP Budget to the City Council alongside the annual budget. City Council The City Council plays a critical role in shaping the direction of the CIP, setting policies and authorizing funding each year. By thoroughly examining proposals and making final approvals, the Council helps guarantee that infrastructure investments meet the priorities and needs of residents while upholding financial stewardship and supporting the City’s long-term needs. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 15 ONGOING FUNDING SOURCES General Fund Class C Road Funds Transportation Fund Funding Our Future Funding Sources Salt Lake City uses a mix of funding sources to invest in infrastructure and deliver capital projects. The General Fund, which supports most City services and operations, plays a key role by transferring funding each year to support the CIP. Capital funding sources generally fall into two categories: ongoing funding and one-time funding. • Ongoing funding includes revenues the City receives regularly, typically each year. These sources provide a stable foundation for planning and maintaining infrastructure over time. • One-time funding includes limited or project-specific resources that are not expected to continue year after year. These sources are typically used for specific projects or phases of work. Not all funding sources can be spent on all projects and matching the funding source to the project type helps the City plan responsibly, maintain long-term financial stability, and commit funding sources to specific projects. Ongoing Funding Sources General Fund The General Fund supports services such as public safety, parks, streets and public art. Each year, the City Council transfers a portion of General Fund revenues to the CIP to fund capital projects. These are the City’s most flexible funds which can be used for any project. General Fund revenues come from sources such as sales taxes, property taxes, franchise taxes, permits, and fees. Funding Our Future A portion of the General Fund is revenue from a local option sales tax labelled “Funding Our Future” that supports key community priorities. This funding is dedicated to affordable housing, public transit, public safety, streets, and parks maintenance. The sales tax increase was adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2019 budget following extensive public outreach. While the dedicated categories have CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND16 evolved over time, funding continues to be directed toward critical community needs and is allocated annually through the budget process. Class C Road Funds aka the State Gas Tax Class C Road Funds come from the State’s gas tax and are distributed to cities based on roadway mileage. State law limits how these funds can be used, including qualifying roadway construction and maintenance, safety improvements, and related costs. Salt Lake City primarily uses these funds for street maintenance and reconstruction projects that are selected through a structured planning process and included in the City’s pavement management plan. Transportation Fund Sales Taxes The County Quarter Cent and “Fifth Fifth” Transportation Fund revenues come from local sales taxes dedicated to improvements. These funds support a multimodal system, including qualifying streets, sidewalks, bike facilities, transit improvements, safety upgrades, street maintenance and reconstruction. Funding is shared among regional partners, including the Utah Transit Authority and Salt Lake County, and must be used for eligible transportation purposes as defined by state law. One-Time Funding Sources Impact Fees Impact fees are one-time charges on new development that help fund the infrastructure needed to support that growth. Impact fees help ensure that growth contributes to the cost of the infrastructure it requires, rather than placing the full burden on existing residents. Since impact fees may only be used for the growth-related portion of a project, they often fund only part of a project which also requires matching funds from another funding source. State law generally requires these fees to be spent or contractually committed within six years. Grants The City receives grants from federal, state, county, and private sources to support capital projects. Each grant has specific requirements for how funds can be used, along with reporting, procurement, and contracting rules that the City must follow. Grants also often require a local match and may be paid out through a reimbursement to the City that occurs after costs are incurred. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 17 ONE-TIME FUNDING SOURCES Impact Fees Donations Bonds Public-Private Paternships Grants Donations Donations are voluntary contributions from individuals, businesses, or organizations that support public projects. These may include cash or in-kind contributions such as land, materials, or services. Donations are often used for eligible capital costs and may help expand or enhance projects. Any recognition associated with a donation follows City policy. Public-Private Partnerships Public-Private Partnerships allow the City to work with private partners to deliver infrastructure projects. These agreements may include design, construction, financing, or ongoing operations. This approach can help deliver projects more efficiently and share certain risks, while maintaining public ownership and oversight. Bonds Bonds are a key tool the City uses to fund large capital projects. The City borrows money from investors and repays the principal over time with interest. Bond funding is often limited to capital uses such as design, property acquisition, and construction. Bond programs are typically approved through a public process and include ongoing reporting for transparency. There are many different types of bonds available to cities. Three of the more common types used by the City are: • General Obligation Bonds: These voter-approved bonds are repaid through a dedicated property tax and are used for a wide variety of projects such as streets, parks, and public facilities. The dedicated property tax ends when the General Obligation bond is fully paid off. • Revenue Bonds: These bonds are repaid from specific revenue sources. Revenue bonds are currently repaid through sources such as Sales Tax, Municipal Energy Tax, Franchise fees, and Class C road funds. • Local Building Authority Bonds: These bonds are used to finance the construction of new public buildings. The City makes lease payments over time to repay the debt. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND18 City Policies, Master Plans, and Other Qualifying Studies Capital projects in Salt Lake City are guided by a framework of plans, policies, and regulations. To be eligible for CIP funding, projects must be identified in or advance a priority in an adopted City master plan or supported by a technical study. This approach helps ensure that investments are thoughtful, consistent, and aligned with community priorities. Together, these tools help align capital investments with legal requirements, financial policies, and long-term goals. Additionally, some projects are required to be reviewed and approved by partners, according to state law, adding another layer of review and assurance of meeting regional needs. City Ordinances City ordinances govern how certain funding sources, such as impact fees, can be used. They also establish the role of the CDCIP Board in reviewing projects and making funding recommendations as part of the CIP process. City Council Resolutions Resolutions provide policy guidance on capital planning, debt management, handling cost overruns and ensuring responsible use of public funds. Resolution 29 Resolution 29 of 2017 provides the foundation for how Salt Lake City plans and funds capital improvements in a transparent and consistent way. It defines what qualifies as a capital project, emphasizes maintaining existing infrastructure, and supports long-term planning. The resolution also outlines expectations for evaluating projects, including cost, operational impacts, and community benefits. It establishes processes for prioritizing projects, managing cost overruns, and using available funding sources effectively. Administrative Policies Administrative Policies guide how projects are evaluated and prioritized. They support consistency, transparency, and alignment with City objectives throughout the planning process. Title 57, Capital Asset Management Title 57 of the Administrative Policies establishes the Capital Asset Planning Committee, to guide the review and coordination of major CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 19 capital projects. The committee includes leadership from most City departments and supports a coordinated, citywide approach to infrastructure planning. The Capital Asset Planning Committee reviews and evaluates internal project proposals, recommends projects to the CDCIP Board, and helps guide policies related to the Capital Asset Plan and CIP. The Finance Department supports this work by managing the Capital Asset Plan, coordinating CIP budgeting and reporting, and providing analysis and administrative support to City leadership and the City Council. Master Plans and Supporting Studies The Capital Asset Plan reflects the priorities and values of Salt Lake City residents. Projects are based on adopted master plans, technical studies, and community input, ensuring that investments respond to real needs across the city. These plans guide investments in key areas such as transportation, buildings, parks, and other public infrastructure. Links to relevant master plans and supporting studies are included in the appendix. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND20 Existing Capital Assets include City-owned buildings, infrastructure like bridges or park pavilions, and other long-lived capital assets that are already in service and support daily operations and public services. A city capital asset must cost at least $50,000 and have a minimum life span of 5 years, or 10 years if funded with impact fees. Maintaining these capital assets is essential to deliver reliable services across the city. For planning purposes, maintenance, renewal, and replacement work is organized by capital asset type and by the department responsible for managing those capital assets. The categories below describe the types of projects used to keep infrastructure in good condition, extend its useful life, maintain reliable service, and protect the City’s long-term investment. Transportation/Engineering Divisions Street Capital Asset Replacement and Renewal (collector, arterial, and local streets, and alleyways) • Street Overlay - Overlay of City streets that have not yet fallen to the level of deterioration where full reconstruction is required. The overlay program includes a 3 inch or greater depth asphalt mill and overlay, curb and gutter replacement and sidewalk replacement in select locations, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. • Street Reconstruction - Reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including street pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements as necessary, and appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. • Alleyways - Reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary. Bridge Capital Asset Replacement and Renewal • Bridge Reconstruction – Reconstruction or major rehabilitation of deteriorated City bridges that have reached the point where substantial structural repair or replacement is needed. Work may include bridge decks, structural supports, railings, joints, drainage components, and other related elements necessary to restore safe and reliable use. • Bridge Maintenance – Planned preservation and renewal of City bridges to help extend their useful life and reduce the need for more Existing Capital Asset Project Descriptions – Capital Maintenance, Renewal and Replacement CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 21 costly major repairs. Work may include repairs or replacement of bridge decks, joints, railings, drainage components, protective coatings, and other structural elements based on inspection findings and condition assessments. Traffic Signals, and Intersection Replacement and Renewal • Replaces aging traffic intersections and signals that have reached the end of their useful life, typically around 40 years, based on condition rankings that consider equipment age, condition, maintenance history, and staff input. Improvements may include replacing outdated equipment—such as steel poles, span wires, signal heads, and loops— with upgraded infrastructure like mast arm poles, new signal heads, pedestrian countdown timers, improved detection for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians, left-turn phasing (as needed), replacement of non-functional CCTV cameras, curb and gutter and ADA ramps. • Upgrades computer system and software near mid-life to increase the overall lifespan of the system to 40 years. This is budgeted at 30% of the cost of full intersection replacement. These upgrades improve safety, reliability, and operations for all travel modes and reduce the risk of structural failure or signal outages. Streets Division Traffic Signal Maintenance–Supports the off-cycle replacement of individual traffic signal and pedestrian infrastructure components throughout the City. Rather than waiting for full intersection replacement, the program addresses specific capital assets that have reached the end of their useful life to maintain safe, reliable, and accessible operations. This proactive approach helps reduce long-term costs compared with reactive repairs or emergency replacement. Public Way Concrete/Sidewalk–Addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. ADA Sidewalk Ramps–Installation and upgrade of ADA-compliant curb ramps at locations throughout the City to improve accessibility within the public right-of-way. These improvements help the City meet requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and provide safer, more independent travel for people with disabilities and others with mobility limitations. By replacing outdated or missing ramps, the program improves connections between streets and sidewalks, reduces hazards, and helps create a more accessible and connected transportation network. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND22 Facilities Division Building Capital Asset Renewal and Replacement–Supports planned replacement, renewal, and major rehabilitation of City-owned buildings and building systems. Improvements may include roofs, heating and cooling systems, electrical and plumbing systems, structural elements, safety and security features, and accessibility upgrades. The program helps preserve City facilities, reduce the risk of unexpected failures, improve building performance, and ensure that public buildings remain safe, reliable, and capable of supporting City services. Public Lands Department Playgrounds–Planned renewal and replacement of playground equipment and related site features in City parks. Improvements may include play structures, safety surfacing, shade elements, seating, fencing, and other components needed to maintain safe, functional, and welcoming play areas. This helps address aging infrastructure, improve safety, and preserve access to quality recreational spaces for children and families. Courts–Replacement and renewal of outdoor recreational courts in City parks and public spaces. This helps maintain safe and usable facilities for recreation while extending the life of public capital assets. Fields–Replacement and renewal and improvement of athletic and recreational fields throughout the City. Work may include turf replacement, grading, drainage improvements, irrigation upgrades, field lighting, and related site improvements needed to maintain playability and safety. This helps preserve recreational opportunities, improve field conditions, and support continued community use. Irrigation Systems–Improves irrigation efficiency and replaces some turf areas with low-water, regionally-appropriate plantings. Many of the public lands’ irrigation systems are 50-60 years old. They use more water, take more time, and cost more to maintain than newer systems. Converting irrigation systems so that trees can be watered separately from turf reduces water usage and protects these critical assets, too. During extreme drought conditions, upgraded irrigation systems can also dramatically reduce or even turn off turf irrigation while continuing to water trees. Pavilions–Renewal and replacement of pavilions, as well as associated amenities (signage, tables, barbecues, landscaping, water, and accessibility features). CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 23 Public Restrooms–Renewal and replacement of public restrooms in parks and other City facilities. Improvements may include building systems, fixtures, plumbing, accessibility upgrades, ventilation, lighting, and other work needed to maintain safe, sanitary, and reliable service. The program helps ensure that public restrooms remain functional, accessible, and suitable for community use. Park ADA Requirements–Supports improvements needed to help parks comply with accessibility requirements under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Work may include accessible routes, curb ramps, parking improvements, restroom upgrades, seating access, playground accessibility features, and other barrier-removal measures. The program helps create a more inclusive park system by improving access, safety, and usability for people with disabilities and others with mobility limitations CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND24 I A nnual CIP Budget–Project Lists II Six-Year Projection III A nalytics Reports IV L ist of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances, Master Plans and Qualifying Technical Studies Appendices CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 25 Appendix I Annual CIP Budget–Project Lists This appendix presents the City’s annual Capital Improvement Program project lists, including projects reviewed, recommended, funded and unfunded through the yearly open and competitive capital budgeting process. It is intended to provide a clear record of annual capital investment proposals and decisions and to demonstrate how near-term funding actions support the broader goals of the Capital Asset Plan. #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 1 Street Reconstruction Engineering Division This program funds reconstructions of Salt Lake City streets including associated design improvements for walking, bicycling, and transit, as required by City Ordinance and federal law. When a street is reconstructed, the entire right of way is surveyed and deficiencies corrected to all elements including roadway, drainage, sidewalks, and street trees. The program meets all federal Americans With Disability Act (ADA) requirements, which are always triggered with a complete reconstruction. This year’s funding request is higher than FY26’s $4.5 million to allow reconstruction of more lane miles, in keeping with the ongoing deterioration of the city’s street network. Streets tentatively to include: 200 S (Univ St to 1300 E) in prep for S Davis Connector; 600 East (100 S to 400 S) in combination with FY26 constituent CIP; Gilmer Dr. (Douglas to 1300 E); 900 South (Diestel to LeGrande); Military Dr. (900 S to 1700 E); Emerson Ave (1500 E to 1700 E); Texas St. (N terminus to 2100 S); Belaire Dr (Scenic to Glen Oaks); and 500 West (600 S to 900 S). This is the first year without funds from the 2018 Streets Bond; ideal funding would be closer to $50-60 million per year. REQUEST $8,327,500 CDCIP $7,489,500 $4,500,000 $2,989,500 MAYOR $8,327,500 $113,379 $514,536 $4,652,515 $3,047,070 COUNCIL $ - 2 Sugar House Park 50/50 Match Public Lands Department This project (a 50/50 cost share with Salt Lake County) will make an infrastructure improvement to Sugar House Park. The replacement of the culinary waterline, which is nearing the end of its useful life and may soon be in a state of critical failure. Failure of the water line would result in park closure and significant emergency maintenance costs. REQUEST $1,000,000 CDCIP $1,000,000 $1,000,000 MAYOR $1,000,000 $1,000,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND26 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 3 GREENbike Federal Grant Match 2027; Bike Rack Replacements Transportation Division Salt Lake City’s bike share system, GREENbike, has received $792,455 in federal funds that require $57,545 in city match. This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations . GREENbike’s oldest equipment is over 12 years old and has been exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. The balance of this funding request will be used to replace old, rusted, bent, or missing bike racks and/or bike corrals which primarily support Salt Lake City’s local business districts and nodes, including many small retail and restaurant businesses. Federal grants: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) REQUEST $65,000 CDCIP $65,000 $65,000 MAYOR $65,000 $65,000 COUNCIL $ - 4 Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027 Streets Division Funds replacement of concrete street panels, broken sidewalks, and rehabilitation such as sawcutting & slabjacking for safety considerations. This program has great need, and could easily use $1.5 million per year. This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 5 years has averaged 63%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. REQUEST $750,000 CDCIP $750,000 $750,000 MAYOR $750,000 $750,000 COUNCIL $ - 5 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 Transportation Division Salt Lake City’s Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been adequately funded for years. As a result, traffic signals throughout the city are falling into failing condition, requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics and wiring each year. When a traffic signal fails, it is not as obvious as a pothole -- unless the signal pole rusts through and the signal falls over, which can happen. More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a simple timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light running, and crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff attention to physical repairs and/or resetting the signal’s computers. For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements per year and 5 upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years. However, since only zero, one or two signals have been funded each year, this program continues to fall further behind. This financially constrained request of $2.5 million seeks to fund full replacement of 4 ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus 6 capital upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Locations tentatively to include: 1300 E 100 S; Main St. North Temple; 600 E 500 S; 500 E 600 S. Alternates: Arapeen / Sunnyside; 1300 E 200 S. REQUEST $2,500,000 CDCIP $2,000,000 $2,000,000 MAYOR $2,000,000 $200,000 $1,800,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 27 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 6 Street Overlay 2027 Engineering Division Short segments of streets focused on preventing deterioration that would require a full reconstruction. Includes streets in livable streets zones and along neighborhood byways. Streets tentatively to include: 1000 North (Featherstone Drive to Redwood Road); 1200 West (1400 South to Andrew Avenue); 1500 West (Hayes Avenue to American Avenue); Alta Street (Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road); Connor Street (Sunnyside Avenue to 900 South); Livingston Avenue (Star Crest Drive to Omni Drive); Omni Drive (Omni Avenue to Livingston Avenue); South Temple Street (University Street to South Temple traffic circle); Village View Street (Village Hill Avenue to Village Park Avenue); Brava Street (Amiga Drive to cul-de- sac end); Reveille Circle (Colonel Road to cul-de-sac-end) REQUEST $3,300,000 CDCIP $3,300,000 $1,842,500 $1,457,500 MAYOR $3,300,000 $1,842,500 $1,457,500 COUNCIL $ - 7 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement) Public Lands Department This project will fund the replacement of one failing restrooms of Salt Lake City’s 47 park restrooms, and upgrade one (Riverside Park). Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands’ inventory are unsafe, frequently closed or unusable when they are intended to be open due to vandalism and misuse. New restrooms will improve safety and maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with the 2010 ADA Standards and increase accessibility. REQUEST $1,136,000 CDCIP $1,136,000 $1,136,000 MAYOR $1,136,000 $1,136,000 COUNCIL $ - 8 Jordan Park Sewer and Stormwater Infrastructure Improvements Public Lands Department Currently, the northern parking lot at Jordan Park is not appropriately connected to the City’s stormwater and sewer systems, causing frequent back-ups into the parking lot and northern portion of the park. This emergency maintenance project would allow for adequate, safe connections to the City’s sewer and stormwater systems and compliance with Public Utilities, alleviate maintenance burdens for Parks Division operations teams, and allow for safe and healthy park use by visitors. REQUEST $300,000 CDCIP $300,000 $300,000 MAYOR $300,000 $300,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND28 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 9 Vision Zero Corridors & Safety Improvements Citywide 2027 Transportation Division Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in a city. While all crashes cannot be avoided, proven safety countermeasures can help turn fatal crashes into bumps or fender benders. This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A) that was formulated, after being funded by Congress, under the leadership of former SLC Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the Wasatch Front Regional Council, with Salt Lake City as a partner. https://wfrc.org/programs/csap/ The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake City where safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are state highways, but some are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. This request seeks targeted funds to focus on those corridors with a significant crash history, and with characteristics that can be made safer with infrastructure investments. This program funds two aspects: (1) $1.2 million Vision Zero Corridors Phase II, addressing key safety concerns on top three identified SLC corridors in Comprehensive Safety Action Plan: 900 West, 800 South, and Redwood Road. These 3 corridors were recommended in WFRC’s 2024 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan for a total of $128.5 million. SLC is selecting strategic and feasible projects within those recommendations to implement first. More expensive elements are likely to be grant funded and/or combined with future street reconstructions. (2) $1.1 million safety improvements citywide including selected crosswalks near schools. REQUEST $2,300,000 CDCIP $2,300,000 $1,948,500 $121,500 $230,000 MAYOR $2,300,000 $1,948,500 $121,500 $230,000 COUNCIL $ - 10 Urban Trails Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. REQUEST $450,000 CDCIP $450,000 $450,000 MAYOR $450,000 $450,000 COUNCIL $ - 11 Lighting Replacement to Improve Safety And Access Public Lands Department This project will replace existing lighting fixtures in parks that have neared or reached the end of their useful life. Lighting replacement will improve safety and visibility, allow for the continued monitoring of underutilized spaces, and decrease maintenance costs. REQUEST $564,000 CDCIP $564,000 $564,000 MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 29 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 12 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Facilities Division This program supports our goal of keeping City facilities safe, code-compliant, and functional by addressing existing building assets that are beyond their useful life, nearing or at failure, or no longer meeting operational needs. Asset management data (Cartegraph) and recent Facility Condition Assessment reports help identify likely priorities; this list is a starting point, but facility needs require flexibility to adapt to changing conditions, funding, and real-time insights. Consistent investment is critical and without it, the maintenance backlog will continue to grow, making it more difficult and costly to maintain safe, reliable, and compliant facilities. These investments help prevent failures, reduce emergency repairs, avoid service disruptions, and support ongoing regulatory compliance. Below are the definitions of priorities 1–4. 1. Life Safety & Code Compliance - Assets that ensure the building is safe for occupancy and meets legal codes and emergency standards. 2. Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) - Assets that provide structural support and protect the building from external elements. 3. Core Infrastructure Systems (MEP) - Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems that support base building operations. 4. Operational Building Systems - Assets that support day-to-day function, accessibility, and internal operations. REQUEST $2,910,000 CDCIP $2,737,500 $2,737,500 MAYOR $2,737,500 $2,737,500 COUNCIL $ - 13 Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance Streets Division This funding is to address the need for ongoing lifecycle replacement for traffic signal components/assets. This is to ensure long-term cost savings compared to reactive replacement. Traffic signals and pedestrian facilities are critical infrastructure components that directly affect safety, mobility, equity, and quality of life. It enhances accessibility for all users, including those with disabilities. REQUEST $750,000 CDCIP $500,000 $500,000 MAYOR $500,000 $500,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND30 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 14 Transit Capital Program 2027 Transportation Division The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and accessible first/last mile connections to transit. This program implements two of the key recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe, and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law, particularly when streets are repaved or reconstructed. After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop amenities and maintains them for the life of the assets. Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible “frequent service” brand and enhanced amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at Frequent Transit Route bus stops throughout the city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit access and waiting experience. Some of the new shelters are now equipped with lighting, which will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are waiting. REQUEST $500,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 15 Plaza 349 Balconies and Masonry Repairs and Improvements Facilities Division A recent condition assessment at Plaza 349 identified significant deterioration of the balcony guard walls and railings, including failing masonry blocks and unsecured metal handrails, creating a potential life-safety hazard due to the risk of falling materials. The existing guard rail heights also do not meet current building code requirements. The study evaluated existing conditions through site observations, field measurements, and selective demolition to expose concealed structural components. Findings indicate limited masonry reinforcement and inadequate anchorage of the guard rail system. Based on these conditions, the study recommends retrofitting or reconstructing the balcony guard walls and railings to meet current code requirements for guard height and structural loading, and to eliminate ongoing safety risks to building occupants and the public below. REQUEST $750,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 16 Demolition of Colfax and Odyssey House Facilities Division Colfax and Odyssey House are both vacant and in poor condition. Odyssey House has sustained significant structural damage that places the building at risk of failure and poses a safety hazard to adjacent areas. Demolition of both structures is recommended to address safety concerns and eliminate ongoing maintenance liabilities. Removal of these buildings would allow for expanded City use of the site, with initial needs identified for Facilities and Parking Enforcement equipment storage. REQUEST $80,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 31 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 17 Street’s Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility Streets Division ADA Ramps provide a fully accessible public right-of-way, which is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cities are required to update ramps and ADA access to meet federal law (Americans with Disabilities Act - ADA), ensure safety and independence for people with limitations, which triggers requirements for compliant curb ramps to allow safe movement between streets and sidewalks. Outdated or missing ramps and sidewalks force people into the street, create hazards, and disconnect neighborhoods. REQUEST $750,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $750,000 $750,000 COUNCIL $ - 18 Irrigation Upgrades and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping Program Public Lands Department This climate-forward project will help shape a water and resource-conscious future with two essential components: replacement of aged and damaged irrigation systems, improving irrigation efficiency and reducing operational costs; and strategically replacing water-intensive turf in passive areas with climate adapted, regionally-appropriate plantings. The project also may separate tree-specific irrigation from other area or drip irrigation zones to ensure the health of our City’s canopy even during drought. Funding will also go towards updating and replacing water meters as required by Public Utilities for compliance. This will be a build-to-budget request. Possible Locations: First Encampment Park, 200 West Medians (North REQUEST $1,200,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 19 Bikeway Gaps 2027 Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. REQUEST $125,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND32 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 20 Washington Park Septic Expansion Public Lands Department Currently, the capacity of the septic system at Washington Park is insufficient to serve the current use. Due to the increased use (Salt Lake City’s most reserved pavilions and event space) and the age and capacity of the current system, Parks Division staff spend considerable time pumping and maintaining the current system, which diminishes their capacity to maintain other parks and costs the City more money. By upgrading the system, maintenance time and frequency of pumping would decrease. REQUEST $950,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $950,000 $950,000 COUNCIL $ - 21 Civic Center Construction Documents (from 200 East to the Western Library Square Crescent Wall) Public Lands Department This project will fund construction document design for the heart of Library Square, west of the Library’s crescent wall and contiguous with 200 East, creating a cohesive public space serving as Salt Lake City’s “living room”. The proposed design will replace or eliminate existing failed assets, including crumbling walls, pavers and stairs; address deferred maintenance needs for the square waterproofing and Old Library parking structure where waterproofing has long failed; and, add trees for shade along with level or gently sloped green spaces conducive to both events and everyday uses. The design will create the central “room” of the Civic Center, bringing spaces and people together. REQUEST $2,200,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 22 Parks’ Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Program Public Lands Department Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is federal civil rights law, and the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Three types of park infrastructure at up to seven parks will be improved to or beyond the aforementioned standards: (1) site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and accessible ground surfacing under play areas; (4) access to and within restrooms. This is a build-to-budget request. REQUEST $811,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $811,000 $324,400 $486,600 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 33 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 23 Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin) Constituent Application; Engineering Division A portion of Highland Park Elementary’s designated “Safe Routes to School” is lacking sidewalks and curb & gutter. It is on Kenwood Street, right at the school’s west exit and continues on Atkin Avenue until the crosswalk (with a crossing guard) on Imperial Street. It is a high traffic area, with many students walking or biking in an area with limited visibility, no safe pathway, and many cars. It is dangerous we want our students to be able to safely walk and bike to school! Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart. REQUEST $213,000 CDCIP $213,000 $213,000 MAYOR $213,000 $213,000 COUNCIL $ - 24 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings CIP aims to make safety improvements to intersections with neighborhood byways from 200 East to 1200 East. 6 neighborhood byways cross 1700 South through this stretch, with many of these critical crossings lacking any kind of increased visibility, traffic control, or protection for people walking or biking on these byways and attempting to cross 1700 South, greatly hindering the connectivity of these routes. This CIP focuses on the crossings at 200 East, 400 East, 800 East, 1000 East, and 1200 East (McClelland Trail), covering the Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park, and Sugar House communities. The crossing improvements would utilize strategies to reduce the crossing distance, improve visibility, and provide physical refuge for pedestrians and cyclists, including bulb-outs and refuge islands. This corridor provides access to schools, grocery stores, local businesses, parks, and lots of housing, and these improvements could greatly improve the active transportation network and access to Bus Route 17. This project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC’s goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions for SLC’s sustainability goals. REQUEST $263,000 CDCIP $263,000 $263,000 MAYOR $263,000 $263,000 COUNCIL $ - 25 Repave Alley #4195 Constituent Application; Engineering Division Repair alley #4195 damage from SLC’s 2019 9th S reconstruction. Alley #4195 was severely damaged from contractor use of the alley to move equipment and materials from 11th E to 12th E as a convenience. The 08-2018 ELPCO meeting materials from SLC describes the impact to be 1 lane closed, driveway closures and parking restrictions. SLC or the contractor should be responsible for damage caused outside of the construction zone of 9th S. The pre-2018 condition of the alley had semi consistent pavement and a partial storm drain infrastructure. After 9th S reconstruction; broken pavement and no effective surface or spring water management. This damaged infrastructure impacts property use, parking, safety and ADU development. Additionally, storm water and spring water have accelerated the deterioration of this public infrastructure that is necessary for public utility access as well as private property use and development. This CIP proposal is a request for SLC to address deferred maintenance, 9th S construction impacts and impediments to reasonable access to and development of properties that abut an easement that SLC is responsible to maintain. Affected residents look forward to the opportunity to meet with the SLC departments with shared roles in managing easement-maintenance and the very real need for a solution that can bridge the existing gaps in departments, budgets and responsibility that residents must navigate to find a resolution. We are enthused that the current CIP funding has increased funding to $500K and includes surface water and alley easement issues as a priority. REQUEST $302,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND34 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 26 EV Charging PSB Phase III Facilities Division We are requesting funding for Phase 3, the final phase, of the EV charging infrastructure project at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a critical facility supporting Police, Fire, the Emergency Operations Center, and combined dispatch. The overall project provides 20 Level 2 charging ports to support approximately 50 Public Services, Police, and Fire vehicles. Phases 1 and 2 establish the necessary electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer and supporting upgrades identified by Kimley-Horn & Sawatch. Phase 3 completes the project by installing the remaining chargers, allowing the charging system to be fully utilized as designed and ensuring the facility can support the City’s expanding EV fleet. REQUEST $80,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $80,000 $80,000 COUNCIL $ - 27 Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division Rose Park Elementary has been collaborating with Bike Utah, the Rose Park Community Learning Center, and SLC Transportation since June 2024 to improve safety for students who walk and bike to school. The project purpose is to identify the safest routes to school for students and improve intersections where even the safest routes have barriers. This part of the project was informed by traffic safety data, 2 community bilingual open houses, and a bike safety audit during the 2024-25 school year, resulting in the Rose Park Elementary Safe Routes to School Assessment (attached). The school community and traffic safety data agreed: the crossings along 900W, particularly at the intersections of 800N and 900N, as well as Sterling Dr & American Dr, present major barriers for students trying to access the school neighborhood and other amenities from their apartments. Improvements to 900W are planned, however they do not reach this neighborhood. Rose Park Elementary, Bike Utah, and SLC Transportation are planning a quick-build installation for late October to address these crossings temporarily. However, the proposed permanent crossing solutions are appropriate and will bring relief to many students and other community members in this densely populated yet isolated block of the Rose Park neighborhood. The intersection of Sterling Dr and American Beauty Dr, where students frequently cross on their way to school, is only a two way stop and cars going north-south cut through the neighborhood. This application proposes to make the crossings on 900W at 800N and at 900N safer through infrastructure change via RRFB’s, concrete islands, speed feedback signs, and school crosswalks. These measures will capture the attention of drivers and slow them down. We also propose adding stop signs at American Beauty Dr and Sterling Dr to create a four-way stop. Together, these measures will create a safer and more comfortable route for children walking, scooting, or biking to school. REQUEST $362,000 CDCIP $362,000 $362,000 MAYOR $362,000 $362,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 35 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 28 Traffic Circle 700 S 500 West Constituent Application; Transportation Department The Granary District Alliance (GDA) hopes to fund a traffic circle at 700 South and 500 West in the heart of the Granary District. REQUEST $577,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 29 Access Control Transition to S2 Facilities Division This project completes the transition of access control systems at the remaining 13 City facilities to the S2 platform. The City has already begun migrating facilities to this standardized, more secure access control system, and this phase represents the final rollout to ensure consistency across the portfolio. Upgrading these remaining locations will improve security, system reliability, and centralized management, while reducing risks associated with outdated or unsupported technologies and ensuring a consistent approach to access control citywide. REQUEST $300,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 30 Poplar Grove 500 S Traffic Calming Constituent Application; Transportation Division Traffic calming measures between 900 West and the Jordan River Trail on 500 South. * Reduce the speed of vehicles using a system of speed humps (6). * Make pedestrian crossings shorter and make pedestrians more visible * Marked/raised cross walks leading to the Post Street Tot Lot, The Neighborhood House, and at the intersection of the Jordan River Parkway REQUEST $464,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND36 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 31 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (New Restroom) Public Lands Department This project will fund the strategic installation of one new restroom in Salt Lake City. Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands’ inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable when they are intended to be open due to poor design and vandalism. New restrooms will improve safety, maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with ADA and increase accessibility. REQUEST $568,000 CDCIP $568,000 $568,000 MAYOR $568,000 $568,000 COUNCIL $ - 32 Fire Training Grounds Site Improvements Fire Department; Facilities Division The Fire Training Grounds currently has ~45,000 square feet of underutilized space, primarily covered in gravel and weeds. The proposed site improvement project aims to enhance this area to better support firefighter training, reduce grounds maintenance, and secure the site. The project includes the excavation and construction of paved area surrounding fire training props to allow access for firefighters and fire vehicles as they train. Ideally this training ground would simulate a small cross section of the structures that are in Salt Lake City and the site improvement would resemble streets and access points like what is in the city along with the addition of the Drager Training Prop. This project is broken into three phases: (1) Training Ground Improvements Phase 1 - Regrading the half the field to drain to existing catch basins, clearing and grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads. (2) Training Ground Improvements Phase 2 - Regrading the remaining half of the field to drain to existing catch basins, clearing and grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads. (3) Drager Training Prop - Installation of the training prop. Prop will enable training in: fire behavior, fire control, hydration, SCBA and safety equipment training, heat stress management, smoke and ventilation exercises, and more. Note: This phase will be requested in a future CIP cycle. REQUEST $1,000,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 33 Missing Sidewalks Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year’s funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. REQUEST $125,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 37 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 34 Wasatch Hollow Dog Park Constituent Application; Public Lands Department During our meeting on June 25, 2025, the council discussed the current un-fenced, time-restricted off-leash dog area and its challenges. After thorough deliberation and community input, the Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) voted in favor of sending a recommendation to the City to fence an approximate 0.5-acre off-leash dog area within the park. The motion was passed with 28 votes in favor and 1 abstention. We believe that fencing the off-leash dog area will address the concerns raised by community members and enhance the safety and usability of the park for all visitors. We kindly request your support in advancing this recommendation through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application process. We understand that the scope and funding of the project depend on the application’s acceptance. In addition, the WHCC board would welcome a meeting with representatives from the City as the process progresses to discuss the details of the fenced area. REQUEST $556,000 CDCIP $556,000 $556,000 MAYOR $556,000 $556,000 COUNCIL $ - 35 Slow Down Liberty Wells South Constituent Application; Transportation Division The addition of traffic calming measures within the Liberty Wells community - specifically on 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E between 1700 S and 2100 S. The community has suffered under the onslaught of vehicles traveling north and south on these streets ignoring the posted speed limit through the residential area. I personally have been asking Salt Lake City to provide some sort of traffic calming since 2007. I live on 400 E, within sight of the electronic driver feedback boards, and the speeds displayed on the boards regularly show in the 30 to upper 40 MPH, even though the posted speed limit is 20 MPH. REQUEST $517,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 36 Emerson Street 1500 East -1600 East Replacement Constituent Application; Engineering Division Replacement of the existing Emerson Ave. street from 1500 East to 1600 East. REQUEST $390,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND38 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 37 Central 9th and Ballpark Traffic Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division The Central Ninth neighborhood is one of Salt Lake City’s most walkable and transit-connected districts; however, pedestrian and bicycle safety remains a concern. This project will deliver targeted safety upgrades that improve crossings, visibility, and driver awareness in key locations that access open spaces, while also strengthening connections to the 9 Line Trail. The proposal: - New crosswalks crossing West Temple at Mead Ave, with road striping, roadway narrowing with concrete planters to calm traffic, and solar-powered push-button LED crosswalk beacons (RRFB) for greater visibility, without the need for trenching. - Six solar-powered street lights located in the park strip along Mead Avenue, between West Temple and 200 W. Two lights are positioned on the south side of Mead Avenue between West Temple and Jefferson Street. Four lights will be on the north side of Mead Ave. between Jefferson St and 200 W, with double lights pointing at the sidewalk and street. - Solar-powered push-button crosswalk beacons at 900 S. crossings at Jefferson St. and Washington St. enhance pedestrian visibility. - A street light on the southwest corner of Jefferson St. and 900 S to illuminate the 9 Line crossing of Jefferson St. - Motion-activated LED warning signs on the 9 Line Trail crossings at West Temple and State St. alert drivers to stop for pedestrians and cyclists. - Angled parking striping on the north side of Mead Ave from Jefferson St to 200 W and also on the east side of Jefferson St. from Mead Ave to Goltz Ave. - These upgrades will make walking and biking in Central Ninth safer and more user-friendly. This project combines proven traffic-calming strategies with highly visible crosswalk technology to meet Salt Lake City’s goals for equitable, safe, and multimodal transportation, while reinforcing the neighborhood’s role as a vibrant and walkable area. REQUEST $138,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 38 Texas Street Replacement Constituent Application; Engineering Division Replacement of Texas Street asphalt (OCI 13) from terminus south of Hillside Middle School one block to Redondo Avenue. Most of the “Overhead approach” driveways on the east side of the street are in equally poor condition and need to be replaced. The conditions are noticeably deteriorated since submitting a CIP for this last year. REQUEST $769,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 39 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 39 Active Transportation User Improvements - Glendale Constituent Application; Transportation Division This project is designed in response to public comments in Glendale Neighborhood Council meetings, neighbor concerns, and data collected via the West-East connection study advocating for the concept of a safe “walkable” neighborhood. It addresses several small budget-friendly but influential infrastructure improvements along two bus lines (UTA line 9 and 513) with a history of both chronic vehicle accidents and high pedestrian usage. The improvements can be quickly implemented for rapid community impact as resources permit, or over a multi-year period if necessary. Infrastructure improvements include (1) redesigning the JRT/California intersection for increased signal usage by pedestrians, resulting in improved traffic flow and safety for cyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles, (2) implementing a first-responder friendly speed table at a key neighborhood entry point on California Ave (East of Redwood Road) to enforce speed limits and prevent further serious pedestrian accidents, (3) constructing a bulb-out at the intersection adjacent to Title I K-8 school Dual Immersion Academy (DIA), a site of heavy child-pedestrian, vehicle, and UTA bus activity, and (4) the installation of raised cross-walks at the Glendale Dr/Navajo St intersection near the same high-poverty school. REQUEST $735,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 40 Nibley Park School Crossing Constituent Application; Transportation Division Add new ADA ramps and crosswalk south of the driveway for Nibley Park School. REQUEST $140,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 41 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access Public Lands Department This project will strategically add lighting to parks to both improve safety throughout key parks and to extend play for sport fields and courts. Lighting added to entire parks will help improve sight lines, safety and the perception of safety, comfort, usability, level of service, and will allow for better monitoring of historically-underutilized spaces. Sport and field lighting will allow for extended play during darker months, and will allow spaces to be more activated during park opening hours. This is a build-to-budget request. REQUEST $460,000 CDCIP $460,000 $460,000 MAYOR $460,000 $460,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND40 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 42 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project would install lighting at the popular Glendale Park pickleball and tennis courts. REQUEST $955,000 CDCIP $955,000 $955,000 MAYOR $955,000 $955,000 COUNCIL $ - 43 Proposal for Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division The streets between 200 E and 300 E, from 900 S to 1300 S, experience excessive speeding at all hours. This presents a significant safety concern, particularly for school-aged children walking to Liberty Elementary. While a crossing guard is stationed at 900 S, the next supported crossing is not until Herbert Avenue, leaving a long stretch without safe pedestrian access. To address this, I propose the installation of raised crosswalks along 300 E. In addition, smaller neighborhood streets, Hubbard, Belmont, Williams, and Herbert, would benefit from mid-block speed cushions to reduce speeding. As a resident of Hubbard Avenue, I recommend prioritizing this block for speed cushions, along with a raised crosswalk at 200 E. Hubbard, which is narrower than the surrounding streets and has a history of traffic calming requests for support, including speed trailers. It is also a primary walking route for students attending Liberty Elementary and the Salt Lake Arts Academy. Residents have repeatedly reported excessive speeding with cars trying to avoid the lights at 900 S. These improvements would significantly enhance pedestrian safety, support walkability, and protect the well-being of both residents and visitors. With a growing residential population and an increase in local businesses, the city must prioritize traffic calming measures to ensure the neighborhood remains safe and accessible for all. REQUEST $705,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 44 Fire Alarm Additions Facilities Division During a recent facilities audit, it was identified that about 27 City facilities lacked fire alarm systems. This project will use allocated funds to install compliant fire alarm systems at these locations to address safety gaps and meet code requirements. Fire alarm systems have been averaging approximately $50,000 per facility, though costs will vary based on building conditions and scope. As a life safety asset, installation is critical to protecting occupants, operations, and assets. REQUEST $1,000,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 41 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 45 Playground Shade Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Install shade clothes over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the summer, playground equipment is too hot to use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds, the community will enjoy increased use of play equipment for the full day in the summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer. Potential locations include Westpointe Park, Riverside Park, Sherwood Park, Modesto Park, 1700 South River Park, Herman Franks Park, Fairmont Park based on previous funding, overall condition of current assets, funding equity, and efficiencies with other construction projects. REQUEST $552,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 46 Jordan Park Basketball Court Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project proposes the design and construction of a full-length outdoor basketball court at Jordan Park in Glendale, Utah. The court will serve as a safe, accessible and inclusive recreational space for youth, families, and community members of all ages. By adding this facility, we will expand opportunities for physical activity, mentorship and community- building in a neighborhood where quality recreational spaces are limited. REQUEST $579,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND42 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 47 Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff Constituent Application; Transportation Division This project will make the neighborhood more livable, walkable, and safe for pedestrians, including for school children. We have three schools in a small area (Beacon Heights Elementary, Hillside Middle School, and Cosgriff private). Due to the increase in cut-through and speeding traffic in our neighborhood, it has become increasingly unsafe to cross the street, especially at school drop-off/pick-up times. As a result we need to calm traffic to make safe routes. Specifically, we request the following (each aspects can be phased): 1) 4 speed cushions on 2100 S (between Nevada St and 2600 E) 2) 3 raised crosswalks on 2100 S (between Nevada St and Wyoming St) 3) No parking signs near blind corners along 2100 S (between Nevada Street and 2600 E) 4) 3 enhanced crosswalks on Redondo St (at Texas St, Wyoming St, and 2500 E intersections) 5) 2 speed cushions on Texas Street (between 2100 S and Parley’s Way) The speed cushions will help to slow traffic and draw the driver’s attention to safe driving. It is very common to see drivers speeding much in excess of the speed limit on this stretch, particularly while cutting from Foothills to 2300 E, and vice versa. The raised crosswalks will advance pedestrian safety and visibility. There is currently only one cross-walk on this stretch of 2100 S, and its a simple painted crosswalk. For the amount of pedestrian traffic across this road, it is simply insufficient as is. The no parking signs will help to make turning out to 2100 S much safer, as currently turning onto 2100 S from several intersecting roads, drivers and pedestrians cannot see the oncoming traffic, and have to inch out into the roadway too far. The enhanced crosswalks will slow traffic and increase pedestrian visibility. The intersections on Redondo are currently two way stop, and often have confusion about stopping/non-stopping, making it unsafe for drivers and pedestrians. Together, these actions will improve the safety of our neighborhood. REQUEST $438,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 43 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 48 Curtis Park Playground Replacement Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Our application seeks to revitalize Curtis Park (1421 S 2200 E, Salt Lake City, District 6), a small but high-use open space currently hosting an outdated playground and under utilized open space. Despite its condition, the playground is heavily used because it sits just west of Foothill Village and is surrounded by a vibrant active neighborhood. Our project will: - Replace the small, outdated playground with a larger modern one. - Activate the property by lowering the earth wall on 2200 E - Connect the public land north to south with pathways so the park can be walked and ridden on a bike in a loop. The loop will connect to the already planned corridor running east to west that connects 2200E to the Foothill Village Mall’s new west entrance, flowing through to the the playground. This proposal deserves consideration because: - Timely opportunity to leverage private funding while it’s available: Foothill Village remodel. This project ensures the park serves as a connector, not a barrier. - Walkability & SLC goals: Creating paths and connections supports a walkable city, reduces vehicle trips, and aligns with SLC’s Reimagine Nature plan. - Safety & accessibility: New playground, lighting, and safe pathways for bikes, strollers, and scooters will greatly improve community use. - Vibrant hub: Updating the park alongside Foothill Village’s remodel transforms underused land into an inviting, modern public space. REQUEST $433,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 49 9-Line Greening: Transforming 9.5 Blocks of 900 South from Gray to Green Public Lands Department This project will convert gray gravel to green landscaping on nine and a half blocks along 900 South (9-Line Trail) from 650 West to 500 East. This is the final phase of the transformation of 900 South into an urban greenway, putting the bow -- and the green space amenities -- on top of the 900 South Reconstruction project, completed in early 2024. The reconstruction project had budget sufficient to install only gravel along many of the spaces that were ideally intended for vegetation, landscaping, and park-like amenities. This project will complete the street transformation with irrigation, trees, landscaping, and other amenities to turn the gravel patches along the side of the street into a functional public greenway. REQUEST $2,000,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND44 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 50 800 E Traffic Islands Constituent Application, Transportation Division 800 E between 1700 S and 2100 S is a wide street without any breaks so speeding vehicles regularly usually use this street as an alternative to 700 E and 900 E (north and south bound) especially when it is rush hour traffic. The city had a proposal to build traffic calming islands a few years ago and all residents got mailers from the city about this project but from my conversations with the City’s Transportation Division, the project has been shelved due to funding issues. The entire section of 800 E between 900 S and 2100 S did function as a walkable, live and play street during COVID and it was amazing for residents and pedestrians. The city converted a portion of 800 E between 1700S and 1300 S permanently into a live/play street which is super nice but the other sections have gone back to vehicular traffic as the project has been shelved due to funding issue. The proposal here is to revive this project to install traffic calming island and other such features to be installed between 1700S and 2100 S with some green elements such as trees and shrubs included in these islands/ Chicanes. This section of 800 E between 1700S and 2100 S is arguably more important to have these traffic calming features due to its proximity to 2100 S and all the vehicular traffic flows into our neighborhood making it quite dangerous for our kids and pets. REQUEST $1,400,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 51 Gregson Avenue / Lincoln Street Asphalt Speed Bumps Constituent Application; Transportation Division Install two concrete speedbumps that are separated by 200 feet along the curved intersection of Gregson Avenue and Lincoln Street in Sugarhouse, Salt Lake City. REQUEST $60,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 52 700 South Neighborhood Byway and 700 East Crossing Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 700 South Neighborhood Byway CIP aims to make safety improvements to 700 South between 300 East and 900 East, including intersection curb extensions, traffic calming, and, vitally, provide a safe and signalized walking and biking crossing on 700 East, connecting the Central City and East Central REQUEST $1,119,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 45 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 53 Justice Courts Interim Improvements Facilities Division This project provides interim improvements to the Justice Court facility while a new building is planned. Upgrades will focus on enhancing security, improving space utilization, and supporting operational efficiency. Specific improvements may include addressing an egress code issue, security lighting additions, glazing improvements, modifications to optimize workspace layout, and enhancements to access control and other security systems. These measures will help protect City assets, ensure life safety, and support the Justice Court’s ability to continue operations effectively until a permanent facility is constructed REQUEST $450,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 54 McClelland Trail Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division I live in the East Liberty Park Community Organization’s (ELPCO) boundaries and I am concerned about the McClelland trail crossings in my neighborhood. Specifically, the streets that cross the McClelland trail between 1560 S and 1300 S (Bryan, Kensington, Emerson, Roosevelt, Browning, and Harrison Avenue). Emerson Elementary school children regularly walk or bike this trail on the way to and from school. The trail is heavily used by people in the neighborhood. The existing cross walks with the signage, safety islands on street margins, and pink color help, but some kind of speed bump, raised crosswalk, and/or flashing light would really make it a lot safer because based on my and other neighbor’s observations, some cars ignore the signage and speed though the crosswalks. I’ve been in contact with a staff member at Salt Lake City DOT about this application. I had a discussion with him about what might work best at the crossings. Both of us think that a raised crosswalk would slow traffic and flashing lights on the trail crossing signs connected to a push button (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons or RRFBs) at each trail crossing would help in increasing pedestrian safety particularly because they could be installed on the safety islands along the street margins where they would be much more visible. Speed bumps near the crossings would accomplish the same goal as the raised crosswalks, and may be a more economic alternative because they would not require alteration of the current crossings. REQUEST $571,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 55 Repave Alley 3rd & 4th Ave, and Alta & Virginia Constituent Application; Engineering Division Requesting repavement of our alley between 3rd and 4th avenue and Virginia and Alta streets Salt Lake City, Utah 84103. REQUEST $214,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND46 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 56 Roxbury & Kensington Pedestrian Safety Constituent Application; Transportation Division The East Bench Community Council and the Indian Hills Elementary School Community Council have collaborated to jointly propose important improvements for pedestrian safety in two areas of the St. Mary’s neighborhood near school catwalks. These projects address pedestrian safety hazards in school zones and will protect children, improve walkability for all residents, and align with Salt Lake City’s goals for safe routes to school and Vision Zero. 1. There are no sidewalks on either side of Beacon Drive (east of Wasatch Dr.) leading to a school catwalk accessing Indian Hills (approximately 2570 E. Beacon Dr); nor are there any on Kensington Ave. At this time, a number of the residents on Beacon Dr. are adamantly opposed to the installation of sidewalks, so we propose a sidewalk on Kensington Ave., where the neighbors are more amenable to a sidewalk cutting through their property. 2. Roxbury Road borders the east side of Indian Hills Elementary School. Two school crosswalks extend across the street, leading to a catwalk that provides school access. Excessive speeding is a major concern in this area, especially at the wide intersection of Roxbury & Canterbury. To address these safety concerns, we propose: *Raising crosswalks *Speed bump(s) south of the catwalk * Road narrowing treatments, such as bollards and high-visibility paint to reduce lane width, discourage speeding, and prevent illegal parking near crosswalks, possibly similar to the attached picture from Westminster Road in SLC. * Center island or raised median at the Canterbury” “Roxbury Intersection REQUEST $380,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 57 Main & Broadway Street Activation Constituent Application; Engineering Division The Downtown Community Council and the owners of the Clift Building seek to improve and activate the northwest corner of Main Street and Broadway, arguably one of the most prolific downtown corners for crime, vandalism, and drug use. The applicants are proposing new sidewalk improvements on Broadway from the alley for the 222 parking garage to Main street. This stretch of sidewalk was not completed in Salt Lake City’s shade tree planting program. In its current state, this area acts as a sun-drenched heat island out of character aesthetically with sidewalks and streets in the surrounding area. These deficiencies will be addressed with planting of trees, placement of planters and seating. Safety issues for bicyclists and scooters will be addressed with appropriate placement of bollards and larger planters to clearly delineate car lanes from the bicycle lane at the corner of Main Street. The historic Clift Building is located on this corner. The Clift Building owners are willing to install outdoor dining at this location for its retail tenants if the city is willing to put in planters, trees and other street amenities that the city has already installed in the Central Business District. The City did not previously install trees in this area due to a misunderstanding about the sidewalk’s structural weight capacity. The proposed improvements include planters and other trees in the sidewalk to create a shade canopy that would have normally been installed. The activation of this portion of Main Street will help reduce crime on Main Street and help attract new businesses to the downtown central business district. Staff note: The Engineering Division has identified potential feasibility concerns due to sidewalk weight limitations at the proposed location which may require further inquiry. REQUEST $247,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 47 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 58 1300 South CIP Constituent Application; Transportation Division Project is proposed as a Phase 1 for the California Trail, a proposed multi-use path on the south side of 1300 S, between Foothill and 2300 E. The proposal is meant to help achieve three objectives: 1) Better address traffic conflicts between all modes of transportation, - pedestrian, bicycle/scooter, vehicular in the area to allow people of all ages (especially younger and older citizens) with different abilities to safely travel on foot, bikes, and the like without being forced to use the roadway. Current sidewalks bring these individuals and modalities in conflict with each other. Also, we would hope to provide signs or similar to allow slower people to move safely and avoid user conflicts. 2) Create a neighborhood identity for Saint Mary’s/Sunnyside/East Bench by placing monument signage along the trail to better identify 1300 South as the gateway to the St Mary’s and east bench neighborhood and better address pass through traffic resulting from significant increases in traffic that have occurred incrementally over the last 60 years. The neighborhood plans to pay for the monument signage. 3) Memorialize the path of the California Pioneer Trail (Donner Party) with a” trail marker (s)” as well as the identification of historical features that are located in or adjacent to the area. We would also focus on the preservation of existing trees, and/or planting of new trees. These costs would be covered outside this CIP application. Specifically, the following are included: -- A 12 Foot Wide, Concrete, Multi Use Path on 1300 South (focus of this funding request). Existing sidewalk and park strip will be maintained. New trail/concrete will be built adjacent to (north of) existing park strip. -- Custom Neighborhood Identity and/or California trail historical marker signs (paid for by neighbors). Importantly, J Development, developers of property just east of Foothill, will contribute $200,000 toward the trail improvements. Staff note: The outside funding is not guaranteed at this time therefore the request will remain at $278,000. REQUEST $278,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 59 Greenway Connector - Chapman Library to Jordan River Parkway Constituent Application; Transportation Division As a resident of Poplar Grove, I would like to propose a greenway project that I believe would bring significant benefits to our neighborhood. This project would improve traffic safety, enhance public accessibility, address concerns related to homelessness, and help mitigate urban heat island effects with over 20 new trees for the West Side. Most importantly, it would create a stronger and more welcoming connection between the Jordan River Parkway and the Chapman Library. The Chapman Library serves as a historic landmark, a gathering place, and a vital hub for our community. By creating an island of green space and a traffic circle along 600 South between 900 West and 1000 West, we could transform this stretch of road into a safer, more attractive, and more functional space. This improvement would also complement the design of the street on the opposite side of the circle park, creating a more cohesive and enjoyable experience for both residents and visitors as they move between these two key community destinations. REQUEST $528,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND48 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 60 Safe Side Street North Extension Constituent Application; Transportation Division The project being submitted is a “completely separate project” to a past CIP project within the same block of zone 46. The south side of zone 46 is the “Sugar House Safe Side Streets Project.” https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2023/12/08/safesidestreets/ We are seeking the continuation of traffic calming on the north portion of zone 46. The streets involved are: 1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South) Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 East Wilson Avenue 900 East - 1100 East 1000 East is an iconic byway and a prime destination for active transportation. At the south end of the block is the heart of Sugar House and the north end a children’s destination, Westminster Park. And further north is an elementary school, Emerson Elementary. The goal for the residents of this area is to decrease cut through traffic and slow vehicle speeds. Also to promote safer streets for bicyclists, walkers, joggers, skateboarders and alike to travel this neighborhood byway. Within this block the street calming efforts are not systemic. The residents of this area are asking for the completion of street calming within the neighborhood. This application has the signatures of 120 residents of the area. It also has the support of Landon Clark Sugar House Community Council Chair and Chris Longhurst Sugar House Community Council Transportation Committee Chair. REQUEST $412,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 61 700 E Beautification Project Constituent Application; Engineering Division 700 E is one of the busiest roads in the city. This industrial-looking road emits substantial air pollution and is a source of immense heat affecting health and quality of life for residents in the adjoining neighborhoods. The proposed project aims to plant close to 125 tree saplings along the central median and the curb on the east side of 700 E. Project Location: From 1300 S to 2100 S on 700 E Benefits: i) The lung space created through this project will help absorb toxic green house gases emitted by the traffic. ii) Contains noise pollution iii) Reduces the heat emanating from concrete and asphalt surfaces. iv) Aesthetically pleasing approach road will also lead to increased congregation of people improving economic activity along this road. v) Water percolation along the permeable median created as part of this project can also improve the ground water table which will ultimately benefit the Great Salt Lake. Project details: 700E is a state road, SR-71, which needs coordination with UDOT for project implementation but there are multiple examples of state roads improved by Salt Lake City recently including US-89, SR-186. While 700E is as big of a road as foothill drive or state street with 6 lanes total running through several neighborhoods but is cared for less. The proposed project is an attempt to rectify years of neglect and also use this opportunity to address climate change and make Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park and Sugarhouse communities resilient for the future. REQUEST $2,328,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 49 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 62 Pedestrian Placemaking at the Ballpark Library Lab Constituent Application; Transportation Division The new Ballpark Library Lab, which opened on May 23, 2025, is expected to draw a significant increase in children, families, and neighbors walking to and from West Temple and 1400 South. This section of West Temple currently has limited pedestrian infrastructure, only a single marked crosswalk north of 1400 South, and is a corridor where drivers often travel at high speeds. Without additional investment, the increased foot traffic generated by the Library Lab will create serious safety concerns for residents, library visitors, and students walking to nearby schools. This project proposes safety-focused placemaking to reduce risk and improve visibility for pedestrians in the immediate vicinity of the Library Lab. Project elements would include: - Two high-visibility, book-themed painted crosswalks to slow vehicle speeds and reinforce driver awareness of frequent crossings. - Pedestrian safety and library signage to alert drivers before they approach the library block. - Additional street markings and wayfinding cues that clearly designate pedestrian priority zones. These improvements would directly support Salt Lake City’s Vision Zero commitment and the Transportation Master Plan goal of safer, multimodal corridors. By investing in traffic-calming measures now, the City can prevent collisions, reduce speeding, and ensure that the Ballpark Library Lab opens as a safe, accessible, and family-friendly destination. This project addresses a clear infrastructure gap while also creating a replicable model for pairing new civic facilities with proactive pedestrian safety measures. It is a cost-effective intervention that protects vulnerable users and strengthens neighborhood connections. REQUEST $140,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 63 Traffic Calming for Sherman Avenue Constituent Application; Transportation Division Installing traffic calming measures on Sherman Avenue between 1300 East and 1500 East in order to minimize vehicles speeding on our street. REQUEST $72,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND50 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 64 Median Conversion to Parklet Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project will fund trees, new code compliant curb and gutter, a new efficient irrigation system, a bench and drought- tolerant landscaping. Curb and gutter are critical infrastructure improvements. This project will fund the new curb and gutter. Curb and gutter will direct storm runoff. Adequate curbing provides safety, separating the median from the street. Curb cuts allow improved access. This project funds a new efficient irrigation system. Turf reduction and water conservation are critical. Turf reduction and proper irrigation will reduce water usage, lowering water bills. This project will fund the installation of trees. Trees are vital to our urban communities. Trees provide shade and cooler temperatures, combatting the heat island effect. They sequester carbon, fight climate change and capture runoff. Trees boost our mental health and improve our wellness. This project will fund a bench, for comfort and relaxing, landscape boulders for their aesthetic appeal and drought- tolerant landscaping. Let’s create an inviting parklet on this under-utilized public open space. The median is the property of Salt Lake City, Department of Public Lands/Parks. REQUEST $52,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 65 First Encampment Park Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project will remove the deteriorated chain-link fence surrounding First Encampment Park, along with the trees and stumps that have grown through and damaged the fence line. The current fence is broken, unsafe, easily climbed, and heavily compromised by overgrowth, creating concealment opportunities and attracting harmful activity. Replacing it with a full-height, solid privacy fence will provide a safe, uniform, and durable perimeter that reflects the dignity of this historic Pioneer landmark. This improvement will also allow neighbors to restore their own affected landscaping and will give the park a clean, intentional appearance from the street inward. REQUEST $53,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 66 Sunnyside Ave & Amanda Safe Street Crossing Constituent Application; Transportation Division This is a safe street crossing for everyone, transit and trail connecting, urban heat island mitigation and air quality improvement project. A rapid flashing beacon signalized crosswalk with landscape island and user refuge will provide a safe signalized crossing for a neighborhood area where k-12 school age children and youth, employees, and recreational users cross a 5 lane street on a daily basis. A landscape island will provide an opportunity to mitigate severe heat island effect - which also includes polluted air induced by urban heat island effect. As of August 2025, the street temperature has been measured at 140 F. REQUEST $350,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 51 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 67 Virginia Street Safety and Mobility Improvements Constituent Application; Engineering Division I am writing to urge the use of Capital Improvement Program funds to restore safety and function to Virginia Street. I propose funding (1) the removal of five of the seven speed humps and (2) construction of an off-Virginia bike lane behind Shriners Hospital connecting Alta Street to the Popperton Park Trailhead via an existing sidewalk and dirt trail. Virginia Street is more dangerous post redesign. Four speed humps on the steepest slope, combined with narrowed intersections, create hazards for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians. Drivers brake abruptly while cyclists continue at constant speed, leading to near misses. The right lane down now ends abruptly, forcing bikes around cars into concrete barriers. Vehicles swerve into bike lanes to use cutouts. Humps are placed between, not at, crosswalks, so cars accelerate into crossings. On a 10% grade, the humps make braking and accelerating dangerous; in winter, plows leave ice and at humps, creating slick surfaces. These placements conflict with FHWA and ITE guidelines, which advise against humps on grades above 6%. According to city data, there was no history of serious crashes here, but if and when they happen, it will be the city’s fault. The current design harms quality of life. Residents face longer commutes, more wear on vehicles, and delayed emergency response. Stop-and-go traffic has increased noise, pollution, and brake dust, and diverted traffic to previously quiet L Street, Fairfax, and Alta. Mobility is impaired. 88 percent of neighborhood workers commute by car, and the speed humps on Virginia have made their life worse. Two fixes address this: remove four humps above 4th Avenue and the redundant hump between 1st and 2nd, leaving two on the flatter section. Second, improve the Alta-to-11th Avenue route: add curb cuts, pave the dirt path, and adapt the sidewalk. This provides a safe, shaded, low-traffic option connecting directly to Popperton Park and 11th Avenue. REQUEST $161,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 68 Atkin Avenue Curb and Gutter Constituent Application; Engineering Division We request the installation of curb and gutter on Atkin Avenue between Highland Drive and Beverly Street (approximately 1 city block), particularly on the south side of the street. There are 9 houses on the south side of the street that front Atkin. The north side of the street has two houses that front Atkin and several others that are adjacent to Atkin. We believe the curb and gutter will improve the overall stormwater system. Likewise, the 1300 East project has resulted in Atkin Ave. being used as a detour regularly. Curb and gutter on Atkin would be a nice, inexpensive addition to the overall 1300 East project. Curb and gutter on Atkin would improve the aesthetic of the street and make street parking and snow removal easier. Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart. REQUEST $218,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND52 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 69 Outdoor Calisthenics Equipment Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Construct outdoor fitness equipment similar to that at Murray Park in the underused northeast corner of 9th South River Park. Open to other amenable locations, just want this somewhere reasonably accessible in the city REQUEST $87,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 70 Rosslyn Heights Corridor Island Constituent Application; Transportation Division We are requesting an island to be placed within the wide area of 2000 E. St. between 2280 S and 2300 S (approx.) This proposal includes a raised crosswalk for safe pedestrian travel and traffic calming. Four additional speed humps are proposed along 2000 E to provide consistent vehicle speed control. This proposal would address the following concerns: - Auto and bus traffic have no lanes to funnel safely through the area. (lack pavement markings to delineate travel lanes) - This is an ever-evolving neighborhood, where there are many young families with children continuously using the roads and sidewalks on bike, scooters, skates, and strollers, etc. - Entering or departing the Rosslyn Heights Sports Complex means that cars, buses and pedestrians, are crossing through two-way traffic with no marked lanes. - There is not a crosswalk for pedestrians. This road is very wide, and well populated! - Snow plows often block driveways and sidewalks with their extra large loads, creating difficulty for homeowners, cars, and pedestrians. - Parking on the street can be two-deep in the wide area, and at times, becomes a crowded parking lot. REQUEST $487,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 71 Event Infrastructure for Vibrant, Safe City Parks Program Public Lands Department This project will add infrastructure, such as power, concrete walkways and pads, and lighting, to allow several public parks to serve as active, vibrant hubs for community gatherings and public events. This project will reduce event setup costs, minimize environmental impacts, and increase accessibility for organizers and participants alike to make gathering as communities more accessible. A primary goal of this project is also to alleviate maintenance burdens on parks that receive an excess of events now and to spread out impacts, opportunities, and events in other parks throughout the City. REQUEST $580,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 53 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 72 Public Pet Memorial Constituent Application; Public Lands Department A statue, statues, or placemaking feature of pets on a public space. Radiating out from the placemaking feature will be memorial bricks, benches, and landscaping/trees etc. The bricks and landscaping can be sponsored by the public in memory of pet that person has lost. The bricks can be engraved with the pets name and put in the ground and area can grow over time. The landscaping or trees can have a small plaque listing the pets name and information. Adding a memorial/donation element will ensure that the memorial always continues to grow and is taken care of. Also drinking fountains for both humans and pets. REQUEST $200,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 73 Nature Park at Bonneville Golf Course Constituent Application; Public Lands Department The Nature Park at Bonneville will turn two and a half acres of unusable fire hazard into a small nature park for the surrounding residents. We have the support of SLC’s Golf Division for this project (see Supporting Documents). The height of the fence from the driving range will be increased for safety. This area has been used by three generations of children in this neighborhood, but was recently fenced off for safety reasons. It has a large amount of dead wood, creating a significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area. We see evidence of “campsites” and drug paraphernalia left behind; as well as large piles of concrete and asphalt chunks, dead and broken trees from the golf course, and broken or obsolete golf course equipment. We propose the area be converted to a small nature park with a shredded bark walking path utilizing bark chips from dead wood processed from the area; three benches, access to water to establish drought-tolerant native trees, shrubs and pollinator plants (utilizing free or low-cost programs like the Utah Pollinator Habitat Program, currently offering 90-900 seedlings for free each September). This will require access to water but not an irrigation system. This area will be cleared of junk and debris. Some dead tree material will be cleaned out, but not all, leaving a natural area on the northwestern side for our native wildlife habitat and protection. We will also work to protect the habitat of great horned owls and various hawks living in the area. We propose two entrances: (1) southend of 2200 East, (2) east side of Connor St. at property line to the course. There may also be a southern entrance from the golf course. The end result will offer a safe, natural area for both adults and children to enjoy nature and her wildlife such as great horned owls, red tailed hawks, deer, foxes, and other wild creatures losing habitat in our highly developed city. Staff Note: The “significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area” represents the constituent’s opinion and does not reflect a designation made by the Fire Department. An evaluation of the area would need to be completed by the Fire Department prior to assigning the level of fire risk. REQUEST $1,268,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND54 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 74 Hubbard Ave (200 East to 300 East) Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 200/300 East block of Hubbard Ave (the block directly south of 900 S) desperately needs the city to implement traffic mediation devices to SLOW and potentially divert traffic from the very narrow street. The street is a 2-way street has approximately less that 14ft between parked cars. With the increased motor/vehicle/human traffic on the 9th South corridor, the 200/300 block of Hubbard Ave has seen an overwhelming increase in overflow activity and crime (I have saved footage from my security cameras). Recently, numerous residents of this block met to discuss possible solutions. Some of the solutions that were discussed were: speed humps, increased street lighting, and the possibility to chance the dual traffic flow to a one-way street. The general consensus of the Hubbard constituents are quite grateful of the city’s involvement and vision with the 9th South Corridor. That said, there was also some resentment because the city hasn’t given much consideration to the overflow “growing pains” of the 9th South Corridor. Some residents of the street have actually taken it upon themselves to purchase speed bumps and paint portions of the street to try and slow down the visitors to the 9th South Corridor. Albeit illegal for people to paint the street and place speed bumps, please note those actions were taken out of sheer desperation for the safety of our street and to protect the lives of many children that reside on our street. Numerous families on Hubbard Ave have reached out to our representative (Darin Mano, who is not seeking reelection) and city employees in the Division of Transportation. The only action Hubbard Ave has seen has been the removal of the constituent placed speed bumps. That has sent a message to many that the city is actually hearing complaints but are taking counterproductive measures that essentially make the street less safe. Any proactive measures taken to slow traffic and increase security and safety will be greatly appreciated. REQUEST $100,000 CDCIP $ - MAYOR $ - COUNCIL $ - 75 Glendale Park Mayor Added Project, Public Lands Department This funding will help to advance Phase II improvements, which could include improvements in the center of the site or adjacent to the Jordan River, as identified in the Vision Plan. Design to confirm which amenities will advance in Phase II is now underway with construction anticipated to begin on Phase II in 2026. This funding will also be used for Glendale Park project contingency. REQUEST CDCIP $ - MAYOR $6,000,000 $6,000,000 COUNCIL $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 55 #Totals General Fund Restricted Property Tax Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Transportation Dedicated Sources Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes Title, Lead Office, and Description 76 Bike Racks Mayor Added Project, Transportation Division This funding will be used for the purchase and installation of new bicycle racks citywide with a focus near local businesses in high-demand areas to support cyclists and improve access to nearby shops and services. Funds will not be used for renewal or replacement. REQUEST CDCIP $ - MAYOR $50,000 $50,000 COUNCIL $ - TOTALS REQUEST $58,094,500 CDCIP $25,969,000 $7,000,000 $ - $3,100,000 $2,539,000 $230,000 $4,500,000 $8,600,000 MAYOR $34,884,000 $4,680,879 $3,463,036 $3,100,000 $8,863,400 $430,000 $4,652,515 $9,694,170 COUNCIL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND56 Asset Status Category Asset Year 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Existing Buildings Life Safety & Code Compliance $2,880,000 $90,000 $200,000 $400,000 $420,000 $470,000 Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) $6,360,000 $430,000 $1,340,000 $1,950,000 $1,450,000 $1,280,000 Core Infrastructure Systems (MEP)$14,010,000 $10,420,000 $3,210,000 $6,080,000 $1,750,000 $5,520,000 Operational Building Systems $3,510,000 $750,000 $1,610,000 $730,000 $300,000 $830,000 Interior & Exterior Fixtures & Functional Layouts $4,340,000 $1,220,000 $ - $ - $570,000 $420,000 Comfort, Efficiency, & Aesthetics $ - $430,000 $1,150,000 $940,000 $510,000 $1,330,000 Buildings Total $31,110,000 $13,340,000 $7,490,000 $10,110,000 $5,000,000 $ 9,840,000 Parks Green House Replacement $ - $2,160,000 $ - $ - $2,430,000 $2,530,000 Jordan River Repair $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,250,000 $2,340,000 $2,430,000 $2,530,000 Other Park Structure Replacement $1,530,000 $1,590,000 $1,650,000 $1,720,000 $1,790,000 $1,860,000 Parking Lot and Road Replacements $1,560,000 $1,620,000 $1,690,000 $1,750,000 $1,820,000 $1,900,000 Parks Legal Compliance with ADA Standards for Accessible Design $1,870,000 $1,950,000 $2,020,000 $2,110,000 $2,190,000 $2,280,000 Pavilion Replacements $1,530,000 $1,590,000 $1,650,000 $1,720,000 $1,790,000 $1,860,000 Playground Replacement $1,790,000 $2,180,000 $2,270,000 $2,180,000 $2,260,000 $2,750,000 Safe Open and Clean Restrooms $1,920,000 $2,000,000 $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,240,000 $2,330,000 Appendix II 6-year Expenditure Projection This appendix provides the City’s six-year capital expenditure projection, identifying anticipated investment needs and the planned timing of capital expenditures over the planning horizon. It is intended to support long- range planning, improve financial forecasting, and provide greater transparency regarding the scale and sequencing of future capital needs. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 57 Asset Status Category Asset Year 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Skate Park Replacements $2,080,000 $ - $ - $2,340,000 $ - $ - Sports Court $2,030,000 $2,520,000 $3,030,000 $ 3,690,000 $2,660,000 $3,050,000 Parks Total $16,390,000 $17,770,000 $16,640,000 $20,000,000 $19,630,000 $21,090,000 Transportation Alleyways $5,540,000 $5,770,000 $6,000,000 $6,240,000 $6,480,000 $6,740,000 Bridge Reconstruction $9,330,000 $9,710,000 $10,090,000 $10,500,000 $10,920,000 $11,360,000 Existing Renwal & Replacement Street Signals $2,600,000 $2,700,000 $2,810,000 $2,920,000 $3,040,000 $3,160,000 Public Way Concrete Replacement $750,000 $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 Street OverLays $38,670,000 $40,210,000 $41,820,000 $43,500,000 $45,240,000 $47,050,000 Street Reconstruction $45,110,000 $46,920,000 $48,790,000 $50,750,000 $52,780,000 $54,890,000 Street’s Legal ADA Compliance $750,000 $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 Traffic Signal Capital Maintainance $1,000,000 $1,040,000 $1,080,000 $1,120,000 $1,170,000 $1,220,000 Transportation Total $103,760,000 $107,910,000 $112,220,000 $116,710,000 $121,380,000 $126,240,000 Existing Total $151,250,000 $139,020,000 $136,360,000 $146,820,000 $146,010,000 $157,170,000 Improvement Parks Irrigation Replacement and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 $950,000 Parks Total $780,000 $810,000 $840,000 $880,000 $910,000 $950,000 Transportation Transit Capital Program $14,660,000 $2,000,000 $6,550,000 $11,820,000 $15,300,000 $890,000 Transportation Total $14,660,000 $2,000,000 $6,550,000 $11,820,000 $15,300,000 $ 890,000 Improvement Total $15,440,000 $2,810,000 $7,400,000 $12,690,000 $16,210,000 $1,830,000 New Buildings Life Safety & Code Compliance $650,000 $310,000 $ - $110,000 $ - $ - Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) $170,000 $4,160,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Core Infrastructure Systems (MEP)$50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Operational Building Systems $4,350,000 $11,100,000 $10,840,000 $3,040,000 $170,000 $730,000 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND58 Asset Status Category Asset Year 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Interior & Exterior Fixtures & Functional Layouts $150,000 $310,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - Buildings Total $5,370,000 $15,880,000 $10,840,000 $3,150,000 $170,000 $730,000 Parks Emerald Ribbon Action Plan Transformational Projects $ - $ - $8,440,000 $8,770,000 $9,120,000 $9,490,000 Event Infrastructure & Pavilion Replacement For Safe City Parks $2,600,000 $1,800,000 $1,870,000 $1,950,000 $2,030,000 $2,110,000 Downtown Beautification Corridors $310,000 $320,000 $340,000 $350,000 $360,000 $380,000 Playground Shade $520,000 $540,000 $560,000 $580,000 $610,000 $320,000 Soft Surface Trails- NEW ASSETS $2,200,000 $22,300,000 $ - $38,440,000 $ - $19,010,000 Civic Center $14,220,000 $46,980,000 $6,690,000 $6,960,000 $26,060,000 $18,070,000 Parks Total $19,850,000 $71,940,000 $17,900,000 $57,060,000 $38,190,000 $49,370,000 Transportation Bike Share & Bike Racks $100,000 $110,000 $110,000 $120,000 $120,000 $130,000 Downtown Beautification Corridors $2,090,000 $2,170,000 $2,260,000 $2,350,000 $2,450,000 $2,540,000 Livable Streets $420,000 $430,000 $450,000 $470,000 $490,000 $510,000 Missing Sidewalks and Bikeway Gaps $1,140,000 $1,620,000 $3,600,000 $1,290,000 $1,580,000 $1,710,000 Neighborhood Byways $2,080,000 $2,160,000 $2,250,000 $2,340,000 $2,430,000 $2,530,000 New Street Signals & Roundabouts $520,000 $3,240,000 $3,600,000 $12,990,000 $11,590,000 $3,800,000 Urban Trails $9,520,000 $10,280,000 $7,310,000 $3,580,000 $6,270,000 $9,870,000 Vision Zero $ - $5,410,000 $ - $5,850,000 $18,250,000 $6,330,000 West-East Connections $14,220,000 $46,980,000 $6,690,000 $6,960,000 $26,060,000 $18,070,000 Transportation Total $30,090,000 $72,410,000 $26,280,000 $35,940,000 $69,240,000 $45,480,000 New Total $55,310,000 $160,230,000 $55,020,000 $96,150,000 $107,600,000 $95,570,000 Grand Total $222,010,000 $302,060,000 $198,770,000 $255,670,000 $269,820,000 $254,580,000 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 59 Appendix III Analytics Reports This appendix includes supporting analytical reports used to inform capital planning, funding decisions, and long-term investment strategies. These materials provide additional context regarding historical trends, current budget conditions, and project-level information to support informed decision-making and public transparency. a. Historical Actual Funding This section provides historical information on capital funding levels over prior years. It is intended to show how the City has invested in capital assets over time and to provide context for understanding current funding needs and future planning considerations. Historal Funding Row Labels 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Bonds $21,455,027 $23,779,454 $90,284,342 $24,366,000 $8,672,609 $55,355,027 Buildings $379,454 $12,100,000 ($3,000,000) $3,237,371 Parks $955,027 $23,531,342 $24,366,000 $5,719,428 $50,382,140 Transportation $20,500,000 $23,400,000 $54,653,000 $5,953,181 $1,735,516 Class C $2,046,329 $2,716,306 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,250,000 $10,500,000 Transportation $2,046,329 $2,716,306 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,250,000 $10,500,000 General Fund $10,979,190 $12,175,065 $24,873,605 $29,515,760 $37,479,652 $14,784,549 Buildings $4,928,710 $2,295,373 $10,298,588 $6,329,046 $8,415,300 $3,333,557 Parks $1,164,973 $3,957,609 $4,618,108 $2,509,275 $8,101,996 $8,751,379 Transportation $4,885,507 $5,922,083 $9,956,909 $20,677,439 $20,962,356 $2,699,613 Impact Fees $2,962,282 $ 7,991,970 $13,766,533 $6,363,496 $19,174,800 $9,912,470 Buildings $587,282 $130,275 Parks $500,000 $7,506,950 $9,133,198 $2,728,850 $19,174,800 $ 8,800,000 Transportation $1,875,000 $485,020 $4,633,335 $3,504,371 $1,112,470 Transportation Fund $8,695,770 $4,852,000 $8,000,000 $7,905,177 $13,800,000 $11,151,000 Parks $1,967,000 $1,038,500 $200,000 $200,000 Transportation $6,728,770 $3,813,500 $8,000,000 $7,905,177 $13,600,000 $10,951,000 Grand Total $46,138,598 $51,514,795 $139,924,480 $71,650,433 $83,377,061 $101,703,046 * includes an anticipated $49 million Public Lands Bond tranche. CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND60 b. Projected Revenue This section summarizes revenue information related to capital investment and funding capacity. It is intended to provide context regarding the resources available to support capital projects and to illustrate trends in both ongoing and one-time funding sources. Note the table only shows major ongoing funding sources and not one-time funding sources such as bonds. c. Capital Asset Projects–Remaining Existing Budget This section identifies capital asset projects with remaining budget authority from prior appropriations. It is intended to improve transparency regarding previously approved funding, provide context for project delivery timelines, and help inform future capital budgeting and funding decisions. Forecasted Funding Source 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 Class C $4,500,000 $4,590,000 $4,680,000 $4,770,000 $4,870,000 $4,970,000 General Fund $20,000,000 $20,400,000 $20,810,000 $21,230,000 $21,650,000 $22,080,000 Impact Fees $9,800,000 $10,000,000 $10,200,000 $10,400,000 $10,610,000 $10,820,000 Transportation Fund $9,000,000 $9,180,000 $9,360,000 $9,550,000 $9,740,000 $9,930,000 Grand Total $43,300,000 $44,170,000 $45,050,000 $45,950,000 $46,870,000 $47,800,000 CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 61 Capital Asset Project Category Budget* Buildings $18,232,400 Facilities Capital Asset Renewal and Replacement $13,156,380 New/Improvements Facilities $2,545,913 New/Improvements Fire $171,422 Operational Maintenance $877,907 Other Capital Maintenance $1,480,779 Parks $89,816,884 New/Improvements Parks $70,696,670 Operational Maintenance $2,686,963 Other $338,642 Other Capital Maintenance $4,622,028 Pavilions $1,107,117 Playgrounds/Courts $4,355,605 Public Lands ADA Compliance $2,684,929 Public Lands Irrigation Improvements $1,197,932 Public Restrooms $2,127,000 Transportation $103,883,802 Alleyways $933,247 Bridge Maintenance $1,142,573 Bridge Reconstruction $7,835,794 Complete Street Un-related to Overlay or Reconstruction $4,944,895 Livable Streets $4,999,898 Neighborhood Byways $2,171,263 New/Improvements Engineering $8,600,806 New/Improvements Transportation $4,183,760 Other $684,608 Other Capital Maintenance $43,905 Public Way Concrete $988,954 Street Overlay $7,668,823 Street Reconstruction $36,608,026 Traffic Safety/Safer Crossings/Zero Fatalities $5,923,468 Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade $6,395,942 Transit $5,309,107 Transportation Corridor $5,448,733 Grand Total $211,933,086 * as of 03/31/2026. Includes $51 million of encumbered funds. Does not include anticipated $49 million Public Lands Bond tranche. Includes General Fund, Funding our Future, Transportation Fund, Class C, Impact Fees and Bonds CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND62 Appendix IV List of related Policies, Resolutions, Ordinances, Master Plans and Qualifying Technical Studies This appendix compiles the principal policies, resolutions, ordinances, master plans, and qualifying technical studies that guide the City’s capital planning and investment decisions. It provides the policy and planning framework that supports the Capital Asset Plan and demonstrates how proposed investments align with adopted City direction, legal requirements, and long-term planning objectives. Policies, Resolutions, and Ordinances This section identifies the governing policies, resolutions, and ordinances that shape the City’s approach to capital planning, project eligibility, funding decisions, and program administration. Together, these documents establish the legal and policy framework for consistent, transparent, and accountable capital investment. a. City Council Resolutions i. Guiding Document for CIP - Resolution 29 of 2017 ii. Allocation of Funds from the Cost Overrun Account - Resolution 65 of 2004 i. Policy for Preparing Master Plans - Resolution 14 of 2020 b. Code of Ordinances i. Establishing City Boards and Commissions Chapter 2.07 - City Boards and Commissions ii. CDCIP Board Bylaws Chapter 2.33 - Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Advisory Board iii. Impact Fee Policy Chapter 18.98 - Impact Fees iv. Disposition of Proceeds Chapter 2.58 – City Owned Real Property v. Dedicating Private Streets to the Public Chapter 14.54 – Dedication of Private Streets to Public Ownership vi. Complete Streets Policy Chapter 14.06 - Accommodation of Bicyclists and Pedestrians at All City Owned Transportation Facilities in the Public Right of Way vii. Creation of Capital Projects Fund within the Recreation Enterprise Fund Chapter 15.28 - Capital Projects Fund viii. Allocation to public art and responsibilities of Arts Council Design Board in regards to CIP Chapter 2.30 - Salt Lake Art Design Board ix. Responsibilities of Parks, Natural Lands, Trails and Urban Forestry Advisory Board in regards to CIP Chapter 2.94 - Parks, Natural Lands, Trails, and Urban Forestry Advisory Board CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND 63 x. Public Facility investments within Historic Districts Chapter 21A.06.050 - Historic Landmark Commission xi. Information needed for City Council to make decisions Chapter 2.04 – Office of the Mayor c. Administrative Policies i. Sustainable Infrastructure Policy Chapter 56.3 - Air Quality & Climate Change ii. Capital Asset Planning Committee Chapter 57.10 – Capital Asset Management iii. Debt Financing Management Practices Chapter 53.11 – Debt Financing iv. Impact Fee Policy Chapter 57.11 - Impact Fee Expenditures d. State Legislation i. Utah’s State Impact Fee Act Chapter 11.36a - Utah Impact Fee Act Master Plans and Adopted Plans This section includes the adopted master plans and related planning documents that help identify infrastructure needs, establish community priorities, and support project eligibility for capital funding. These plans help ensure that capital investments are aligned with broader City goals, long-range planning efforts, and adopted policy direction. The City’s General Plan, Plan Salt Lake, sets the big-picture vision of Salt Lake City. The collection of plans below focusses on specific details either at a smaller geographic area or subject matter. a. Engineering Division: Engineering-Six-Year-Plan-Executive-Summary- 2022-Transmittal b. Planning Division: https://www.slc.gov/planning/general-plans c. Transportation Division: https://www.slc.gov/transportation/ plans-studies d. Public Lands Department: Public Lands Master Plan and Qualifying Study List CAPITAL ASSET PLAN – GENERAL FUND64 4,680,879$ 3,463,036$ 3,100,000$ 8,863,400$ 430,000$ 4,652,515$ 9,694,170$ Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes REQUEST 8,327,500$ CDCIP 7,489,500$ 4,500,000$ 2,989,500$ MAYOR 8,327,500$ 113,379$ 514,536$ 4,652,515$ 3,047,070$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 1,000,000$ CDCIP 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ MAYOR 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 65,000$ CDCIP 65,000$ 65,000$ MAYOR 65,000$ 65,000$ COUNCIL -$ Transportation Division Salt Lake City’s bike share system, GREENbike, has received $792,455 in federal funds that require $57,545 in city match. This funding will be used to replace old, rusting, falling-apart stations . GREENbike's oldest equipment is over 12 years old and has been exposed to weather and the public 24/7/365. The balance of this funding request will be used to replace old, rusted, bent, or missing bike racks and/or bike corrals which primarily support Salt Lake City's local business districts and nodes, including many small retail and restaurant businesses. Federal grants: Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ) and Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) COUNCIL AVAILABLE TO SPEND 1 Street Reconstruction Engineering Division This program funds reconstructions of Salt Lake City streets including associated design improvements for walking, bicycling, and transit, as required by City Ordinance and federal law. When a street is reconstructed, the entire right of way is surveyed and deficiencies corrected to all elements including roadway, drainage, which are always triggered with a complete reconstruction. This year's funding request is higher than FY26's $4.5 million to allow reconstruction of more lane miles, in keeping with the ongoing deterioration of the city's street network. S)in combination with FY26 constituent CIP; Gilmer Dr. (Douglas to 1300 E); 900 South (Diestel to LeGrande); Military Dr. (900 S to 1700 E); Emerson Ave (1500 E to 1700 E); Texas St. (N terminus to 2100 the 2018 Streets Bond; ideal funding would be closer to $50-60 million per year. 2 Sugar House Park 50/50 Match Public Lands Department This project (a 50/50 cost share with Salt Lake County) will make a critical infrastructure improvement to Sugar House Park. The replacement of the culinary waterline, which is nearing the end of its useful life and may soon be in a state of critical failure. Failure of the water line would result in park closure and significant emergency maintenance costs. #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 1 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 750,000$ CDCIP 750,000$ 750,000$ MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 2,500,000$ CDCIP 2,000,000$ 2,000,000$ MAYOR 2,000,000$ 200,000$ 1,800,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 3,300,000$ CDCIP 3,300,000$ 1,842,500$ 1,457,500$ MAYOR 3,300,000$ 1,842,500$ 1,457,500$ COUNCIL -$ Engineering Division Short segments of streets focused on preventing deterioration that would require a full reconstruction. Includes streets in livable streets zones and along neighborhood byways. Streets tentatively to include: 1000 North (Featherstone Drive to Redwood Road); 1200 West (1400 South to Andrew Avenue); 1500 West (Hayes Avenue to American Avenue); Alta Street (Federal Heights Drive to Fairfax Road); Connor Street (Sunnyside Avenue to 900 South); Livingston Avenue (Star Crest Drive to Omni Drive); Omni Drive (Omni Avenue to (Village Hill Avenue to Village Park Avenue); Brava Street (Amiga Drive to cul-de-sac end); Reveille Circle (Colonel Road to cul-de-sac-end) 4 Public Way Concrete Replacement & Rehabilitation 2027 Streets Division Funds replacement of concrete street panels, broken sidewalks, and rehabilitation such as sawcutting & slabjacking for safety considerations. This program has great need, and could easily use $1.5 million per year. This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 5 Traffic Signal Replacements & Upgrades 2027 Transportation Division Salt Lake City's Traffic Signal Replacement and Upgrade Program has not been adequately funded for years. As a result, traffic signals throughout the city are falling into failing condition, requiring many patchwork repairs to their electronics and wiring each year. When a traffic signal fails, it is not as obvious as a pothole -- unless the signal pole rusts through and the signal falls over, which can happen. More frequently when a traffic signal fails, it no longer accurately detects motor vehicle and bicycle traffic. This means that the signal then has to be set on a simple timer without being able to sense whether traffic is waiting to cross. This results in additional traffic delays, congestion, and may contribute to road rage, red-light running, and crashes. Signals can also fail in that they require frequent staff attention to physical repairs and/or resetting the signal's computers. For the past several years, the traffic signal program has sought to fund 6 signal replacements per year and 5 upgrades. This level of funding has been needed each year for 10 years. However, since only zero, one or two signals have been funded each year, this program continues to fall further behind. This financially constrained request of $2.5 million seeks to fund full replacement of 4 ranked signals in failing condition with structural and/or equipment deficiencies, plus 6 capital upgrades to detection and/or communications equipment. Arapeen / Sunnyside; 1300 E 200 S. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 2 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 1,136,000$ CDCIP 1,136,000$ 1,136,000$ MAYOR 1,136,000$ 1,136,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 300,000$ CDCIP 300,000$ 300,000$ MAYOR 300,000$ 300,000$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department Currently, the northern parking lot at Jordan Park is not appropriately connected to the City's stormwater and sewer systems, causing frequent back-ups into the parking lot and northern portion of the park. This emergency maintenance project would allow for adequate, safe connections to the City's sewer and stormwater systems and compliance with Public Utilities, alleviate maintenance burdens for Parks Division operations teams, and allow for safe and healthy park use by visitors. 7 Safe, Open and Clean Park Restroom Program (Replacement) Public Lands Department This project will fund the replacement of one failing restrooms of Salt Lake City's 47 park restrooms, and upgrade one (Riverside Park). Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, frequently closed or unusable when they are intended to be open due to vandalism and misuse. New restrooms will improve safety and maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with the 2010 ADA Standards and increase accessibility. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 3 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 2,300,000$ CDCIP 2,300,000$ 1,948,500$ 121,500$ 230,000$ MAYOR 2,300,000$ 1,948,500$ 121,500$ 230,000$ COUNCIL -$ Transportation Division Traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, not just an inevitable result of traveling in a city. While benders. This is the premise of an entire body of work at the U.S. Department of Transportation, and the Safe Streets and Roads For All program (SS4A) that was formulated, after being funded by Congress, under the leadership of former SLC Transportation Director Robin Hutcheson. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety- countermeasures The SS4A program funded a regional Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) through the Wasatch Front Regional Council, with Salt Lake City as a partner. https://wfrc.org/programs/csap/ The CSAP identifies key corridors in Salt Lake City where safety improvements are likely to result in fewer and less severe crashes. Many of these are state highways, but some are local streets. The three priority corridors identified in the plan are Redwood Road, 900 West, and 800 South. This request seeks targeted funds to focus on those corridors with a significant crash history, and with characteristics that can be made safer with infrastructure investments. This program funds two aspects: (1) $1.2 million Vision Zero Corridors Phase II, addressing key safety concerns on top three identified SLC corridors in Comprehensive Safety Action Plan: 900 West, 800 South, and Redwood Road. These 3 corridors were recommended in WFRC's 2024 Comprehensive Safety Action Plan for a total of $128.5 million. SLC is selecting strategic and feasible projects within those recommendations to implement first. More expensive elements are likely to be grant funded and/or combined with future street reconstructions. (2) $1.1 million safety improvements citywide including selected crosswalks near schools. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 4 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 450,000$ CDCIP 450,000$ 450,000$ MAYOR 450,000$ 450,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 564,000$ CDCIP 564,000$ 564,000$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 2,910,000$ CDCIP 2,737,500$ 2,737,500$ MAYOR 2,737,500$ 2,737,500$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 750,000$ CDCIP 500,000$ 500,000$ MAYOR 500,000$ 500,000$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department This project will replace existing lighting fixtures in parks that have neared or reached the end of their useful life. Lighting replacement will improve safety and visibility, allow for the continued monitoring of underutilized spaces, and decrease maintenance costs. 12 Facilities Replacement and Renewal Facilities Division This program supports our goal of keeping City facilities safe, code-compliant, and functional by addressing needs. Asset management data (Cartegraph) and recent Facility Condition Assessment reports help identify likely priorities; this list is a starting point, but facility needs require flexibility to adapt to changing conditions, funding, and real-time insights. Consistent investment is critical and without it, the maintenance backlog will continue to grow, making it more difficult and costly to maintain safe, reliable, and compliant facilities. These investments help prevent failures, reduce emergency repairs, avoid service disruptions, and support ongoing regulatory compliance. Below are the definitions of priorities 1–4. 1. Life Safety & Code Compliance - Assets that ensure the building is safe for occupancy and meets legal codes and emergency standards. 2. Structural Integrity & Envelope (Shell) - Assets that provide structural support and protect the building from external elements. 3. Core Infrastructure Systems (MEP) - Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems that support base building operations. 4. Operational Building Systems - Assets that support day-to-day function, accessibility, and internal operations. 13 Traffic Signal Capital Maintenance Streets Division This funding is to address the need for ongoing lifecycle replacement for traffic signal components/assets. This is to ensure long-term cost savings compared to reactive replacement. Traffic signals and pedestrian enhances accessibility for all users, including those with disabilities. 10 Urban Trails Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year's funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 5 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 500,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 750,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 80,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Transportation Division The Funding our Future Transit Capital Program leverages outside funds from UTA to install bus shelters, benches, trash cans, and partner on the development of mobility hubs and accessible first/last mile connections to transit. This program implements two of the key recommendations of the Transit Master Plan, seeking to make all transit stops accessible, safe, and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. This is also required by federal law, particularly when streets are repaved or reconstructed. After Salt Lake City constructs a concrete bus stop pad, UTA pays for and installs the stop amenities and maintains them for the life of the assets. Also as outlined in the Transit Master Plan, a highly visible "frequent service" brand and enhanced amenities has been developed and is ready for deployment at Frequent Transit Route bus stops throughout the city. These investments in branding and enhanced stations can help achieve the Transit Master Plan goal of providing a safe and comfortable transit access and waiting experience. Some of the new shelters are now equipped with lighting, which will make passengers who are waiting more visible to operators, as well as to increase safety and security while they are waiting. 15 Plaza 349 Balconies and Masonry Repairs and Improvements Facilities Division A recent condition assessment at Plaza 349 identified significant deterioration of the balcony guard walls and railings, including failing masonry blocks and unsecured metal handrails, creating a potential life-safety hazard due to the risk of falling materials. The existing guard rail heights also do not meet current building code requirements. The study evaluated existing conditions through site observations, field measurements, and selective demolition to expose concealed structural components. Findings indicate limited masonry reinforcement and inadequate anchorage of the guard rail system. Based on these conditions, the study recommends retrofitting structural loading, and to eliminate ongoing safety risks to building occupants and the public below. 16 Demolition of Colfax and Odyssey House Facilities Division Colfax and Odyssey House are both vacant and in poor condition. Odyssey House has sustained significant structural damage that places the building at risk of failure and poses a safety hazard to adjacent areas. liabilities. Removal of these buildings would allow for expanded City use of the site, with initial needs identified for Facilities and Parking Enforcement equipment storage. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 6 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 750,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR 750,000$ 750,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 1,200,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 125,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 950,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR 950,000$ 950,000$ COUNCIL -$ Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year's funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. 20 Washington Park Septic Expansion Public Lands Department Currently, the capacity of the septic system at Washington Park is insufficient to serve the current use. Due to the increased use (Salt Lake City's most reserved pavilions and event space) and the age and capacity of the current system, Parks Division staff spend considerable time pumping and maintaining the current system, which diminishes their capacity to maintain other parks and costs the City more money. By upgrading the system, maintenance time and frequency of pumping would decrease. 17 Street's Legal Compliance with 2010 ADA Standards for Accessibility Streets Division ADA Ramps provide a fully accessible public right-of-way, which is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cities are required to update ramps and ADA access to meet federal law (Americans with Disabilities Act - ADA), ensure safety and independence for people with limitations, Outdated or missing ramps and sidewalks force people into the street, create hazards, and disconnect neighborhoods. 18 Irrigation Upgrades and Supportive Waterwise Landscaping Program Public Lands Department This climate-forward project will help shape a water and resource-conscious future with two essential components: replacement of aged and damaged irrigation systems, improving irrigation efficiency and reducing operational costs; and strategically replacing water-intensive turf in passive areas with climate adapted, regionally-appropriate plantings. The project also may separate tree-specific irrigation from other area or drip irrigation zones to ensure the health of our City's canopy even during drought. Funding will also go towards updating and replacing water meters as required by Public Utilities for compliance. This will be a build-to-budget request. Possible Locations: First Encampment Park, 200 West Medians (North Temple to Wall Street), 1200 East Islands from South Temple to 200 South (remaining after FY26 funding) , 600 East and 800 West Medians, Kay Rees Park, and Allen Park Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 7 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 2,200,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 811,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR 811,000$ 324,400$ 486,600$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 213,000$ CDCIP 213,000$ 213,000$ MAYOR 213,000$ 213,000$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department Funding will bring park infrastructure into legal compliance with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which is federal civil rights law, and the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Three types of park infrastructure at up to seven parks will be improved to or beyond the aforementioned standards: (1) site arrival points, (2) pedestrian access routes, and (3) playgrounds and accessible ground surfacing under play areas; (4) access to and within restrooms. This is a build-to-budget request. 23 Highland Park Elementary Sidewalks (Kenwood & Atkin) Constituent Application; Engineering Division A portion of Highland Park Elementary's designated "Safe Routes to School" is lacking sidewalks and curb & gutter. It is on Kenwood Street, right at the school's west exit and continues on Atkin Avenue until the crosswalk (with a crossing guard) on Imperial Street. It is a high traffic area, with many students walking or biking in an area with limited visibility, no safe pathway, and many cars. It is dangerous we want our students to be able to safely walk and bike to school! Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart. 21 Civic Center Construction Documents (from 200 East to the Western Library Square Crescent Wall) Public Lands Department This project will fund construction document design for the heart of Library Square, west of the Library's crescent wall and contiguous with 200 East, creating a cohesive public space serving as Salt Lake City's "living room". The proposed design will replace or eliminate existing failed assets, including crumbling walls, pavers and stairs; address deferred maintenance needs for the square waterproofing and Old Library parking structure where waterproofing has long failed; and, add trees for shade along with level or gently sloped green spaces conducive to both events and everyday uses. The design will create the central "room" of the Civic Center, bringing spaces and people together. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 8 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 263,000$ CDCIP 263,000$ 263,000$ MAYOR 263,000$ 263,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 302,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Engineering Division Repair alley #4195 damage from SLC's 2019 9th S reconstruction. Alley #4195 was severely damaged from contractor use of the alley to move equipment and materials from 11th E to 12th E as a convenience. The 08- 2018 ELPCO meeting materials from SLC describes the impact to be 1 lane closed, driveway closures and parking restrictions. SLC or the contractor should be responsible for damage caused outside of the construction zone of 9th S. The pre-2018 condition of the alley had semi consistent pavement and a partial storm drain infrastructure. After 9th S reconstruction; broken pavement and no effective surface or spring water management. This damaged infrastructure impacts property use, parking, safety and ADU development. Additionally, storm water and spring water have accelerated the deterioration of this public infrastructure that is necessary for public utility access as well as private property use and development. This CIP proposal is a request for SLC to address deferred maintenance, 9th S construction impacts and impediments to reasonable access to and development of properties that abut an easement that SLC is responsible to maintain. Affected residents look forward to the opportunity to meet with the SLC departments existing gaps in departments, budgets and responsibility that residents must navigate to find a resolution. We are enthused that the current CIP funding has increased funding to $500K and includes surface water and alley easement issues as a priority. 24 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 1700 South Neighborhood Byway Crossings CIP aims to make safety improvements to intersections with neighborhood byways from 200 East to 1200 East. 6 neighborhood byways cross 1700 South through this stretch, with many of these critical crossings lacking any kind of increased visibility, traffic control, or the connectivity of these routes. This CIP focuses on the crossings at 200 East, 400 East, 800 East, 1000 East, and 1200 East (McClelland Trail), covering the Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park, and Sugar House communities. The crossing improvements would utilize strategies to reduce the crossing distance, improve corridor provides access to schools, grocery stores, local businesses, parks, and lots of housing, and these improvements could greatly improve the active transportation network and access to Bus Route 17. This project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions for SLC's sustainability goals. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 9 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 80,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR 80,000$ 80,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 362,000$ CDCIP 362,000$ 362,000$ MAYOR 362,000$ 362,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 577,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Department The Granary District Alliance (GDA) hopes to fund a traffic circle at 700 South and 500 West in the heart of the Granary District. 26 EV Charging PSB Phase III Facilities Division We are requesting funding for Phase 3, the final phase, of the EV charging infrastructure project at the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building, a critical facility supporting Police, Fire, the Emergency Operations Center, and combined dispatch. The overall project provides 20 Level 2 charging ports to support approximately 50 Public Services, Police, and Fire vehicles. Phases 1 and 2 establish the necessary electrical infrastructure, including a new utility transformer and supporting upgrades identified by Kimley-Horn & Sawatch. Phase 3 completes the project by installing the remaining chargers, allowing the charging system to be fully utilized as designed and ensuring the facility can support the City’s expanding EV fleet. 27 Rose Park Safe Routes to School Crossing Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division Rose Park Elementary has been collaborating with Bike Utah, the Rose Park Community Learning Center, and SLC Transportation since June 2024 to improve safety for students who walk and bike to school. The project purpose is to identify the safest routes to school for students and improve intersections where even the safest routes have barriers. This part of the project was informed by traffic safety data, 2 community bilingual open houses, and a bike safety audit during the 2024-25 school year, resulting in the Rose Park Elementary Safe Routes to School Assessment (attached). The school community and traffic safety data agreed: the crossings along 900W, particularly at the intersections of 800N and 900N, as well as Sterling Dr & American Dr, present major barriers for students trying to access the school neighborhood and other amenities from their apartments. Improvements to 900W are planned, however they do not reach this neighborhood. Rose Park Elementary, Bike Utah, and SLC Transportation are planning a quick-build installation for late October to address these crossings temporarily. However, the proposed permanent crossing solutions are appropriate and will bring relief to many students and other community members in this densely populated yet isolated frequently cross on their way to school, is only a two way stop and cars going north-south cut through the neighborhood. This application proposes to make the crossings on 900W at 800N and at 900N safer through infrastructure change via RRFB's, concrete islands, speed feedback signs, and school crosswalks. These measures will capture the attention of drivers and slow them down. We also propose adding stop signs at American Beauty Dr and Sterling Dr to create a four-way stop. Together, these measures will create a safer and more comfortable route for children walking, scooting, or biking to school. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 10 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 300,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 464,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 568,000$ CDCIP 568,000$ 568,000$ MAYOR 568,000$ 568,000$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department This project will fund the strategic installation of one new restroom in Salt Lake City. Currently, many restrooms in the Public Lands' inventory are unsafe, closed, or unusable when they are intended to be open due to poor design and vandalism. New restrooms will improve safety, maintenance, and may be open for more of the year. All new restrooms will comply with ADA and increase accessibility. 29 Access Control Transition to S2 Facilities Division This project completes the transition of access control systems at the remaining 13 City facilities to the S2 platform. The City has already begun migrating facilities to this standardized, more secure access control system, and this phase represents the final rollout to ensure consistency across the portfolio. Upgrading these remaining locations will improve security, system reliability, and centralized management, while reducing risks associated with outdated or unsupported technologies and ensuring a consistent approach to access control citywide. 30 Poplar Grove 500 S Traffic Calming Constituent Application; Transportation Division Traffic calming measures between 900 West and the Jordan River Trail on 500 South. * Reduce the speed of vehicles using a system of speed humps (6). * Make pedestrian crossings shorter and make pedestrians more visible * Marked/raised cross walks leading to the Post Street Tot Lot, The Neighborhood House, and at the intersection of the Jordan River Parkway Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 11 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 1,000,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 125,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Fire Department; Facilities Division The Fire Training Grounds currently has ~45,000 square feet of underutilized space, primarily covered in gravel and weeds. The proposed site improvement project aims to enhance this area to better support firefighter training, reduce grounds maintenance, and secure the site. The project includes the excavation and construction of paved area surrounding fire training props to allow access for firefighters and fire vehicles as they train. Ideally this training ground would simulate a small cross section of the structures that are in Salt Lake City and the site improvement would resemble streets and access points like what is in the city along with the addition of the Drager Training Prop. This project is broken into three phases: (1) Training Ground Improvements Phase 1 - Regrading the half the field to drain to existing catch basins, clearing and grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads. (2) Training Ground Improvements Phase 2 - Regrading the remaining half of the field to drain to existing catch basins, clearing and grubbing, compacting existing material, asphalt paving, and placing multiple concrete pads. (3) Drager Training Prop - Installation of the training prop. Prop will enable training in: fire behavior, fire control, hydration, SCBA and safety equipment training, heat stress management, smoke and ventilation exercises, and more. Note: This phase will be requested in a future CIP cycle. Transportation Division This program implements recommendations from the council-adopted 2015 Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan, the 2024 Citywide Transportation Plan, and some recommendations from the 1992 Open Space Plan and the recent Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. This year's funding request will allow the design of the Red Butte Creek Trail, Airport Trail Rehabilitation, and the construction of active transportation gaps (missing sidewalks or bikeway gaps). The Urban Trails program is a partnership between Transportation and Public Lands, with both departments funding and implementing selected projects within the urban trails network. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 12 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 556,000$ CDCIP 556,000$ 556,000$ MAYOR 556,000$ 556,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 517,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 390,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Public Lands Department During our meeting on June 25, 2025, the council discussed the current un-fenced, time-restricted off-leash dog area and its challenges. After thorough deliberation and community input, the Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) voted in favor of sending a recommendation to the City to fence an approximate 0.5-acre off-leash dog area within the park. The motion was passed with 28 votes in favor and 1 abstention. We believe that fencing the off-leash dog area will address the concerns raised by community members and enhance the safety and usability of the park for all visitors. We kindly request your support in advancing this recommendation through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) application process. We understand that the scope and funding of the project depend on the application's acceptance. In addition, the WHCC board would welcome a meeting with representatives from the City as the process progresses to discuss the details of the fenced area. 35 Slow Down Liberty Wells South Constituent Application; Transportation Division The addition of traffic calming measures within the Liberty Wells community - specifically on 300 E, 400 E, and 600 E between 1700 S and 2100 S. The community has suffered under the onslaught of vehicles traveling north and south on these streets ignoring the posted speed limit through the residential area. I personally have been asking Salt Lake City to provide some sort of traffic calming since 2007. I live on 400 E, within to upper 40 MPH, even though the posted speed limit is 20 MPH. 36 Emerson Street 1500 East -1600 East Replacement Constituent Application; Engineering Division Replacement of the existing Emerson Ave. street from 1500 East to 1600 East. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 13 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 138,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 769,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division The Central Ninth neighborhood is one of Salt Lake City's most walkable and transit-connected districts; however, pedestrian and bicycle safety remains a concern. This project will deliver targeted safety upgrades that improve crossings, visibility, and driver awareness in key locations that access open spaces, while also strengthening connections to the 9 Line Trail. The proposal: - New crosswalks crossing West Temple at Mead Ave, with road striping, roadway narrowing with concrete planters to calm traffic, and solar-powered push-button LED crosswalk beacons (RRFB) for greater visibility, without the need for trenching. - Six solar-powered street lights located in the park strip along Mead Avenue, between West Temple and 200 W. Two lights are positioned on the south side of Mead Avenue between West Temple and Jefferson Street. Four lights will be on the north side of Mead Ave. between Jefferson St and 200 W, with double lights pointing at the sidewalk and street. - Solar-powered push-button crosswalk beacons at 900 S. crossings at Jefferson St. and Washington St. enhance pedestrian visibility. - A street light on the southwest corner of Jefferson St. and 900 S to illuminate the 9 Line crossing of Jefferson St. - Motion-activated LED warning signs on the 9 Line Trail crossings at West Temple and State St. alert drivers to stop for pedestrians and cyclists. - Angled parking striping on the north side of Mead Ave from Jefferson St to 200 W and also on the east side of Jefferson St. from Mead Ave to Goltz Ave. - These upgrades will make walking and biking in Central Ninth safer and more user-friendly. This project combines proven traffic-calming strategies with highly visible crosswalk technology to meet Salt Lake City's goals for equitable, safe, and multimodal transportation, while reinforcing the neighborhood's role as a vibrant and walkable area. 38 Texas Street Replacement Constituent Application; Engineering Division Replacement of Texas Street asphalt (OCI 13) from terminus south of Hillside Middle School one block to condition and need to be replaced. The conditions are noticeably deteriorated since submitting a CIP for this last year. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 14 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 735,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 140,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 460,000$ CDCIP 460,000$ 460,000$ MAYOR 460,000$ 460,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 955,000$ CDCIP 955,000$ 955,000$ MAYOR 955,000$ 955,000$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division Add new ADA ramps and crosswalk south of the driveway for Nibley Park School. 41 New Park Lighting to Improve Safety and Access Public Lands Department This project will strategically add lighting to parks to both improve safety throughout key parks and to extend play for sport fields and courts. Lighting added to entire parks will help improve sight lines, safety and the perception of safety, comfort, usability, level of service, and will allow for better monitoring of historically- underutilized spaces. Sport and field lighting will allow for extended play during darker months, and will allow spaces to be more activated during park opening hours. This is a build-to-budget request. 42 Glendale Park Sport Court Lighting Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project would install lighting at the popular Glendale Park pickleball and tennis courts. 39 Active Transportation User Improvements - Glendale Constituent Application; Transportation Division This project is designed in response to public comments in Glendale Neighborhood Council meetings, neighbor concerns, and data collected via the West-East connection study advocating for the concept of a safe "walkable" neighborhood. It addresses several small budget-friendly but influential infrastructure improvements along two bus lines (UTA line 9 and 513) with a history of both chronic vehicle accidents and high pedestrian usage. The improvements can be quickly implemented for rapid community impact as resources permit, or over a multi-year period if necessary. Infrastructure improvements include (1) redesigning the JRT/California intersection for increased signal usage by pedestrians, resulting in improved traffic flow and safety for cyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles, (2) implementing a first-responder friendly speed table at a key neighborhood entry point on California Ave (East of Redwood Road) to enforce speed limits and prevent further serious pedestrian accidents, (3) constructing a bulb-out at the intersection adjacent to Title I K-8 school Dual Immersion Academy (DIA), a site of heavy child-pedestrian, vehicle, and UTA bus activity, and (4) the installation of raised cross-walks at the Glendale Dr/Navajo St intersection near the same high-poverty school. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 15 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 705,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 1,000,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 552,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division The streets between 200 E and 300 E, from 900 S to 1300 S, experience excessive speeding at all hours. This presents a significant safety concern, particularly for school-aged children walking to Liberty Elementary. While a crossing guard is stationed at 900 S, the next supported crossing is not until Herbert Avenue, leaving a long stretch without safe pedestrian access. streets, Hubbard, Belmont, Williams, and Herbert, would benefit from mid-block speed cushions to reduce speeding. As a resident of Hubbard Avenue, I recommend prioritizing this block for speed cushions, along with a raised crosswalk at 200 E. Hubbard, which is narrower than the surrounding streets and has a history of traffic calming requests for support, including speed trailers. It is also a primary walking route for students attending Liberty Elementary and the Salt Lake Arts Academy. Residents have repeatedly reported excessive speeding with cars trying to avoid the lights at 900 S. These improvements would significantly enhance pedestrian safety, support walkability, and protect the well- the city must prioritize traffic calming measures to ensure the neighborhood remains safe and accessible for all. 44 Fire Alarm Additions Facilities Division During a recent facilities audit, it was identified that about 27 City facilities lacked fire alarm systems. This and meet code requirements. Fire alarm systems have been averaging approximately $50,000 per facility, though costs will vary based on building conditions and scope. As a life safety asset, installation is critical to protecting occupants, operations, and assets. 45 Playground Shade Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Install shade clothes over up to five existing playgrounds, listed below. In the summer, playground equipment is too hot to use by 10am. By providing shade to the existing playgrounds, the community will enjoy increased use of play equipment for the full day in the summer. Shade clothes will also help with the prevention of skin cancer. Potential locations include Westpointe Park, Riverside Park, Sherwood Park, Modesto Park, 1700 South River Park, Herman Franks Park, Fairmont Park based on previous funding, overall condition of current assets, funding equity, and efficiencies with other construction projects. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 16 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 579,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 438,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project proposes the design and construction of a full-length outdoor basketball court at Jordan Park in Glendale, Utah. The court will serve as a safe, accessible and inclusive recreational space for youth, families, and community members of all ages. By adding this facility, we will expand opportunities for physical activity, mentorship and community-building in a neighborhood where quality recreational spaces are limited. 47 Safe Routes to Beacon Heights, Hillside, and Cosgriff Constituent Application; Transportation Division This project will make the neighborhood more livable, walkable, and safe for pedestrians, including for school children. We have three schools in a small area (Beacon Heights Elementary, Hillside Middle School, and Cosgriff private). Due to the increase in cut-through and speeding traffic in our neighborhood, it has become increasingly unsafe to cross the street, especially at school drop-off/pick-up times. As a result we need to calm traffic to make safe routes. Specifically, we request the following (each aspects can be phased): 1) 4 speed cushions on 2100 S (between Nevada St and 2600 E) 2) 3 raised crosswalks on 2100 S (between Nevada St and Wyoming St) 3) No parking signs near blind corners along 2100s (between Nevada Street and 2600 E) 4) 3 enhanced crosswalks on Redondo St (at Texas St, Wyoming St, and 2500 E intersections) 5) 2 speed cushions on Texas Street (between 2100 S and Parley's Way) The speed cushions will help to slow traffic and draw the driver's attention to safe driving. It is very common to see drivers speeding much in excess of the speed limit on this stretch, particularly while cutting from Foothills to 2300 E, and vice versa. The raised crosswalks will advance pedestrian safety and visibility. There is currently only one cross-walk on this stretch of 2100 S, and its a simple painted crosswalk. For the amount of pedestrian traffic across this road, it is simply insufficient as is. The no parking signs will help to make turning out to 2100 S much safer, as currently turning onto 2100 S from several intersecting roads, drivers and pedestrians cannot see the oncoming traffic, and have to inch out into the roadway too far. The enhanced crosswalks will slow traffic and increase pedestrian visibility. The intersections on Redondo are currently two way stop, and often have confusion about stopping/non-stopping, making it unsafe for drivers and pedestrians. Together, these actions will improve the safety of our neighborhood. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 17 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 433,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 2,000,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department This project will convert gray gravel to green landscaping on nine and a half blocks along 900 South (9-Line Trail) from 650 West to 500 East. This is the final phase of the transformation of 900 South into an urban completed in early 2024. The reconstruction project had budget sufficient to install only gravel along many of the spaces that were ideally intended for vegetation, landscaping, and park-like amenities. This project will complete the street transformation with irrigation, trees, landscaping, and other amenities to turn the gravel patches along the side of the street into a functional public greenway. 48 Curtis Park Playground Replacement Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Our application seeks to revitalize Curtis Park (1421 S 2200 E, Salt Lake City, District 6), a small but high-use playground is heavily used because it sits just west of Foothill Village and is surrounded by a vibrant active neighborhood. Our project will: - Replace the small, outdated playground with a larger modern one. - Activate the property by lowering the earth wall on 2200 E - Connect the public land north to south with pathways so the park can be walked and ridden on a bike in a loop. The loop will connect to the already planned corridor running east to west that connects 2200E to the Foothill Village Mall's new west entrance, flowing through to the the playground. This proposal deserves consideration because: - Timely opportunity to leverage private funding while it's available: Foothill Village remodel. This project ensures the park serves as a connector, not a barrier. - Walkability & SLC goals: Creating paths and connections supports a walkable city, reduces vehicle trips, and aligns with SLC's Reimagine Nature plan. - Safety & accessibility: New playground, lighting, and safe pathways for bikes, strollers, and scooters will greatly improve community use. - Vibrant hub: Updating the park alongside Foothill Village's remodel transforms underused land into an inviting, modern public space. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 18 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 1,400,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 60,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 1,119,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division Install two concrete speedbumps that are separated by 200 feet along the curved intersection of Gregson Avenue and Lincoln Street in Sugarhouse, Salt Lake City. 52 700 South Neighborhood Byway and 700 East Crossing Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 700 South Neighborhood Byway CIP aims to make safety improvements to 700 South between 300 East and 900 East, including intersection curb extensions, traffic calming, and, vitally, provide a safe and signalized walking and biking crossing on 700 East, connecting the Central City and East Central Neighborhoods. 700 South has been formally identified as a neighborhood byway, specifically including the crossing improvement at 700 East. The current roadway of 700 South is wide and at the crossing of 700 East, a median blocks all traffic traveling on 700 South from crossing 700 East. Those attempting to cross safely on foot currently need to detour 2 blocks total (one quarter of a mile), and the closest improved bicycle crossing is at 900 South. Local businesses dot the corners of this intersection, and improvements will benefit access to Taufer Park, Judge Memorial High School, senior living communities, the Women's Resource Center, the Central City Recreation Center, and the McGillis School. An improved 700 South would provide an east-west connection in the low-stress cycling network, with busy 4/5/600 South to the north and 800 South to the south, and provide connections to north/south routes like the 3/4/500 East bike lanes and 600 and 800 East neighborhood byways. This project is supported by the Salt Lake City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, would contribute to SLC's goal of zero deaths and severe injuries by 2035, and reduce emissions in line with SLC's sustainability goals. 50 800 E Traffic Islands Constituent Application, Transportation Division 800 E between 1700 S and 2100 S is a wide street without any breaks so speeding vehicles regularly usually use this street as an alternative to 700 E and 900 E (north and south bound) especially when it is rush hour traffic. The city had a proposal to build traffic calming islands a few years ago and all residents got mailers from the city about this project but from my conversations with the City's Transportation Division, the project has been shelved due to funding issues. The entire section of 800 E between 900 S and 2100S did function as a walkable, live and play street during COVID and it was amazing for residents and pedestrians. The city converted a portion of 800 E between 1700S and 1300 S permanently into a live/play street which is super nice but the other sections have gone back to vehicular traffic as the project has been shelved due to funding issue. The proposal here is to revive this project to install traffic calming island and other such features to be installed between 1700S and 2100S with some green elements such as trees and shrubs included in these islands/ Chicanes. This section of 800 E between 1700S and 2100S is arguably more important to have these traffic calming features due to its proximity to 2100S and all the vehicular traffic flows into our neighborhood making it quite dangerous for our kids and pets. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 19 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 450,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 571,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 214,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Facilities Division This project provides interim improvements to the Justice Court facility while a new building is planned. Upgrades will focus on enhancing security, improving space utilization, and supporting operational efficiency. Specific improvements may include addressing an egress code issue, security lighting additions, glazing improvements, modifications to optimize workspace layout, and enhancements to access control and other security systems. These measures will help protect City assets, ensure life safety, and support the Justice Court’s ability to continue operations effectively until a permanent facility is constructed 54 McClelland Trail Safety Improvements Constituent Application; Transportation Division I live in the East Liberty Park Community Organization's (ELPCO) boundaries and I am concerned about the McClelland trail crossings in my neighborhood. Specifically, the streets that cross the McClelland trail between 1560 S and 1300 S (Bryan, Kensington, Emerson, Roosevelt, Browning, and Harrison Avenue). Emerson Elementary school children regularly walk or bike this trail on the way to and from school. The trail is heavily used by people in the neighborhood. The existing cross walks with the signage, safety islands on street margins, and pink color help, but some kind of speed bump, raised crosswalk, and/or flashing light would really make it a lot safer because based on my and other neighbor's observations, some cars ignore the signage and speed though the crosswalks. I've been in contact with a staff member at Salt Lake City DOT about this application. I had a discussion with him about what might work best at the crossings. Both of us think that a raised crosswalk would slow traffic and flashing lights on the trail crossing signs connected to a push button (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons or RRFBs) at each trail crossing would help in increasing pedestrian safety particularly because they could be installed on the safety islands along the street margins where they would be much more visible. Speed bumps near the crossings would accomplish the same goal as the raised crosswalks, and may be a more economic alternative because they would not require alteration of the current crossings. 55 Repave Alley 3rd & 4th Ave, and Alta & Virginia Constituent Application; Engineering Division Requesting repavement of our alley between 3rd and 4th avenue and Virginia and Alta streets Salt Lake City, Utah 84103. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 20 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 380,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division The East Bench Community Council and the Indian Hills Elementary School Community Council have collaborated to jointly propose important improvements for pedestrian safety in two areas of the St. Mary's neighborhood near school catwalks. These projects address pedestrian safety hazards in school zones and will protect children, improve walkability for all residents, and align with Salt Lake City's goals for safe routes to school and Vision Zero. 1. There are no sidewalks on either side of Beacon Drive (east of Wasatch Dr.) leading to a school catwalk accessing Indian Hills (approximately 2570 E. Beacon Dr); nor are there any on Kensington Ave. At this time, a number of the residents on Beacon Dr. are adamantly opposed to the installation of sidewalks, so we their property. 2. Roxbury Road borders the east side of Indian Hills Elementary School. Two school crosswalks extend across the street, leading to a catwalk that provides school access. Excessive speeding is a major concern in this area, especially at the wide intersection of Roxbury & Canterbury. To address these safety concerns, we propose: *Raising crosswalks *Speed bump(s) south of the catwalk *Road narrowing treatments, such as bollards and high-visibility paint to reduce lane width, discourage speeding, and prevent illegal parking near crosswalks, possibly similar to the attached picture from Westminster Road in SLC. *Center island or raised median at the Canterbury" “Roxbury Intersection Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 21 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 247,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Engineering Division The Downtown Community Council and the owners of the Clift Building seek to improve and activate the vandalism, and drug use. The applicants are proposing new sidewalk improvements on Broadway from the alley for the 222 parking garage to Main street. This stretch of sidewalk was not completed in Salt Lake City's shade tree planting program. In its current state, this area acts as a sun-drenched heat island out of character aesthetically with sidewalks and streets in the surrounding area. These deficiencies will be addressed with planting of trees, placement of planters and seating. Safety issues for bicyclists and scooters will be addressed with appropriate placement of bollards and larger planters to clearly delineate car lanes from the bicycle lane at the corner of Main Street. The historic Clift Building is located on this corner. The Clift Building owners are willing to install outdoor dining at this location for its retail tenants if the city is willing to put in planters, trees and other street amenities that the city has already installed in the Central Business District. The City did not previously install trees in this area due to a misunderstanding about the sidewalk's structural weight capacity. The proposed improvements include planters and other trees in the sidewalk to create a shade canopy that would have normally been installed. The activation of this portion of Main Street will help reduce crime on Main Street and help attract new businesses to the downtown central business district. Staff note: The Engineering Division has identified potential feasibility concerns due to sidewalk weight limitations at the proposed location which may require further inquiry. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 22 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 278,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division Project is proposed as a Phase 1 for the California Trail, a proposed multi-use path on the south side of 1300 S, between Foothill and 2300 E. The proposal is meant to help achieve three objectives: 1) Better address traffic conflicts between all modes of transportation, - pedestrian, bicycle/scooter, vehicular in the area to allow people of all ages (especially younger and older citizens) with different abilities to safely travel on foot, bikes, and the like without being forced to use the roadway. Current sidewalks bring these individuals and modalities in conflict with each other. Also, we would hope to provide signs or similar to allow slower people to move safely and avoid user conflicts. 2) Create a neighborhood identity for Saint Mary's/Sunnyside/East Bench by placing monument signage along the trail to better identify 1300 South as the gateway to the St Mary's and east bench neighborhood and better address pass through traffic resulting from significant increases in traffic that have occurred incrementally over the last 60 years. The neighborhood plans to pay for the monument signage. 3) Memorialize the path of the California Pioneer Trail (Donner Party) with a" trail marker (s)" as well as the identification of historical features that are located in or adjacent to the area. We would also focus on the preservation of existing trees, and/or planting of new trees. These costs would be covered outside this CIP application. Specifically, the following are included: --A 12 Foot Wide, Concrete, Multi Use Path on 1300 South (focus of this funding request). Existing sidewalk and park strip will be maintained. New trail/concrete will be built adjacent to (north of) existing park strip. --Custom Neighborhood Identity and/or California trail historical marker signs (paid for by neighbors). Importantly, J Development, developers of property just east of Foothill, will contribute $200,000 toward the trail improvements. Staff note: The outside funding is not guaranteed at this time therefore the request will remain at $278,000. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 23 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 528,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 412,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division As a resident of Poplar Grove, I would like to propose a greenway project that I believe would bring significant benefits to our neighborhood. This project would improve traffic safety, enhance public accessibility, address concerns related to homelessness, and help mitigate urban heat island effects with over 20 new trees for the West Side. Most importantly, it would create a stronger and more welcoming connection between the Jordan River Parkway and the Chapman Library. The Chapman Library serves as a historic landmark, a gathering place, and a vital hub for our community. By creating an island of green space and a traffic circle along 600 South between 900 West and 1000 West, we could transform this stretch of road into a safer, more attractive, and more functional space. This more cohesive and enjoyable experience for both residents and visitors as they move between these two key community destinations. 60 Safe Side Street North Extension Constituent Application; Transportation Division The project being submitted is a "completely separate project" to a past CIP project within the same block of zone 46. The south side of zone 46 is the "Sugar House Safe Side Streets Project." https://www.slc.gov/transportation/2023/12/08/safesidestreets/ We are seeking the continuation of traffic calming on the north portion of zone 46. The streets involved are: 1000 East between 1700 South - Garfield Avenue (1860 South) Blaine Avenue 900 East - 1100 East Wilson Avenue 900 East - 1100 East the heart of Sugar House and the north end a children's destination, Westminster Park. And further north is an elementary school, Emerson Elementary. The goal for the residents of this area is to decrease cut through traffic and slow vehicle speeds. Also to promote safer streets for bicyclists, walkers, joggers, skateboarders and alike to travel this neighborhood byway. Within this block the street calming efforts are not systemic. The residents of this area are asking for the completion of street calming within the neighborhood. This application has the signatures of 120 residents of the area. It also has the support of Landon Clark Sugar House Community Council Chair and Chris Longhurst Sugar House Community Council Transportation Committee Chair. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 24 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 2,328,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Engineering Division 700 E is one of the busiest roads in the city. This industrial-looking road emits substantial air pollution and is a source of immense heat affecting health and quality of life for residents in the adjoining neighborhoods. The proposed project aims to plant close to 125 tree saplings along the central median and the curb on the east side of 700 E. Project Location: From 1300 S to 2100 S on 700 E Benefits: i)The lung space created through this project will help absorb toxic green house gases emitted by the traffic. ii) Contains noise pollution iii) Reduces the heat emanating from concrete and asphalt surfaces. iv) Aesthetically pleasing approach road will also lead to increased congregation of people improving economic activity along this road. v) Water percolation along the permeable median created as part of this project can also improve the ground water table which will ultimately benefit the Great Salt Lake. Project details: 700E is a state road, SR-71, which needs coordination with UDOT for project implementation but there are multiple examples of state roads improved by Salt Lake City recently including US-89, SR-186. While 700E is as big of a road as foothill drive or state street with 6 lanes total running through several neighborhoods but is cared for less. The proposed project is an attempt to rectify years of neglect and also use this opportunity to address climate change and make Liberty Wells, East Liberty Park and Sugarhouse communities resilient for the future. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 25 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 140,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division The new Ballpark Library Lab, which opened on May 23, 2025, is expected to draw a significant increase in children, families, and neighbors walking to and from West Temple and 1400 South. This section of West Temple currently has limited pedestrian infrastructure, only a single marked crosswalk north of 1400 South, and is a corridor where drivers often travel at high speeds. Without additional investment, the increased foot traffic generated by the Library Lab will create serious safety concerns for residents, library visitors, and students walking to nearby schools. This project proposes safety-focused placemaking to reduce risk and improve visibility for pedestrians in the immediate vicinity of the Library Lab. Project elements would include: - Two high-visibility, book-themed painted crosswalks to slow vehicle speeds and reinforce driver awareness of frequent crossings. - Pedestrian safety and library signage to alert drivers before they approach the library block. - Additional street markings and wayfinding cues that clearly designate pedestrian priority zones. These improvements would directly support Salt Lake City's Vision Zero commitment and the Transportation Master Plan goal of safer, multimodal corridors. By investing in traffic-calming measures now, the City can prevent collisions, reduce speeding, and ensure that the Ballpark Library Lab opens as a safe, accessible, and family-friendly destination. This project addresses a clear infrastructure gap while also creating a replicable model for pairing new civic facilities with proactive pedestrian safety measures. It is a cost-effective intervention that protects vulnerable users and strengthens neighborhood connections. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 26 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 72,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 52,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 53,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 350,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Transportation Division This is a safe street crossing for everyone, transit and trail connecting, urban heat island mitigation and air quality improvement project. A rapid flashing beacon signalized crosswalk with landscape island and user refuge will provide a safe signalized crossing for a neighborhood area where k-12 school age children and youth, employees, and recreational users cross a 5 lane street on a daily basis. A landscape island will provide an opportunity to mitigate severe heat island effect - which also includes polluted air induced by urban heat island effect. As of August 2025, the street temperature has been measured at 140 F. 65 First Encampment Park Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project will remove the deteriorated chain-link fence surrounding First Encampment Park, along with the trees and stumps that have grown through and damaged the fence line. The current fence is broken, unsafe, easily climbed, and heavily compromised by overgrowth, creating concealment opportunities and attracting harmful activity. Replacing it with a full-height, solid privacy fence will provide a safe, uniform, and durable perimeter that reflects the dignity of this historic Pioneer landmark. This improvement will also allow neighbors to restore their own affected landscaping and will give the park a clean, intentional appearance from the street inward. 64 Median Conversion to Parklet Constituent Application; Public Lands Department This project will fund trees, new code compliant curb and gutter, a new efficient irrigation system, a bench and drought-tolerant landscaping. Curb and gutter are critical infrastructure improvements. This project will fund the new curb and gutter. Curb and gutter will direct storm runoff. Adequate curbing provides safety, separating the median from the street. Curb cuts allow improved access. This project funds a new efficient irrigation system. Turf reduction and water conservation are critical. Turf reduction and proper irrigation will reduce water usage, lowering water bills. This project will fund the installation of trees. Trees are vital to our urban communities. Trees provide shade and cooler temperatures, combatting the heat island effect. They sequester carbon, fight climate change and capture runoff. Trees boost our mental health and improve our wellness. This project will fund a bench, for comfort and relaxing, landscape boulders for their aesthetic appeal and drought-tolerant landscaping. Let's create an inviting parklet on this under-utilized public open space. The median is the property of Salt Lake City, Department of Public Lands/Parks. 63 Traffic Calming for Sherman Avenue Constituent Application; Transportation Division Installing traffic calming measures on Sherman Avenue between 1300 East and 1500 East in order to minimize vehicles speeding on our street. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 27 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 161,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 218,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Engineering Division I am writing to urge the use of Capital Improvement Program funds to restore safety and function to Virginia Street. I propose funding (1) the removal of five of the seven speed humps and (2) construction of an off- Virginia bike lane behind Shriners Hospital connecting Alta Street to the Popperton Park Trailhead via an existing sidewalk and dirt trail. Virginia Street is more dangerous post redesign. Four speed humps on the steepest slope, combined with narrowed intersections, create hazards for cyclists, drivers, and pedestrians. Drivers brake abruptly while cyclists continue at constant speed, leading to near misses. The right lane down now ends abruptly, forcing bikes around cars into concrete barriers. Vehicles swerve into bike lanes to use cutouts. Humps are placed between, not at, crosswalks, so cars accelerate into crossings. On a 10% grade, the humps make braking and accelerating dangerous; in winter, plows leave ice and at humps, creating slick surfaces. These placements conflict with FHWA and ITE guidelines, which advise against humps on grades above 6%. According to city data, there was no history of serious crashes here, but if and when they happen, it will be the city's fault. The current design harms quality of life. Residents face longer commutes, more wear on vehicles, and delayed emergency response. Stop-and-go traffic has increased noise, pollution, and brake dust, and diverted traffic to previously quiet L Street, Fairfax, and Alta. Mobility is impaired. 88 percent of neighborhood workers commute by car, and the speed humps on Virginia have made their life worse. Two fixes address this: remove four humps above 4th Avenue and the redundant hump between 1st and 2nd, leaving two on the flatter section. Second, improve the Alta-to-11th Avenue route: add curb cuts, pave the dirt path, and adapt the sidewalk. This provides a safe, shaded, low-traffic option connecting directly to Popperton Park and 11th Avenue. 68 Atkin Avenue Curb and Gutter Constituent Application; Engineering Division We request the installation of curb and gutter on Atkin Avenue between Highland Drive and Beverly Street (approximately 1 city block), particularly on the south side of the street. There are 9 houses on the south side of the street that front Atkin. The north side of the street has two houses that front Atkin and several others that are adjacent to Atkin. We believe the curb and gutter will improve the overall stormwater system. Atkin would be a nice, inexpensive addition to the overall 1300 East project. Curb and gutter on Atkin would improve the aesthetic of the street and make street parking and snow removal easier. Staff note: This year, there are two separate constituent requests for street improvements to two separate and noncontiguous sections of Atkin Avenue which are several blocks apart. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 28 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 87,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 487,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 580,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Public Lands Department This project will add infrastructure, such as power, concrete walkways and pads, and lighting, to allow several public parks to serve as active, vibrant hubs for community gatherings and public events. This project will reduce event setup costs, minimize environmental impacts, and increase accessibility for organizers and participants alike to make gathering as communities more accessible. A primary goal of this project is also to alleviate maintenance burdens on parks that receive an excess of events now and to spread out impacts, opportunities, and events in other parks throughout the City. 70 Rosslyn Heights Corridor Island Constituent Application; Transportation Division We are requesting an island to be placed within the wide area of 2000 E. St. between 2280 S and 2300 S (approx.) This proposal includes a raised crosswalk for safe pedestrian travel and traffic calming. Four additional speed humps are proposed along 2000 E to provide consistent vehicle speed control. This proposal would address the following concerns: - Auto and bus traffic have no lanes to funnel safely through the area. (lack pavement markings to delineate travel lanes) - This is an ever-evolving neighborhood, where there are many young families with children continuously using the roads and sidewalks on bike, scooters, skates, and strollers, etc. - Entering or departing the Rosslyn Heights Sports Complex means that cars, buses and pedestrians, are crossing through two-way traffic with no marked lanes. - There is not a crosswalk for pedestrians. This road is very wide, and well populated! - Snow plows often block driveways and sidewalks with their extra large loads, creating difficulty for homeowners, cars, and pedestrians. - Parking on the street can be two-deep in the wide area, and at times, becomes a crowded parking lot. 69 Outdoor Calisthenics Equipment Constituent Application; Public Lands Department Construct outdoor fitness equipment similar to that at Murray Park in the underused northeast corner of 9th South River Park. Open to other amenable locations, just want this somewhere reasonably accessible in the city Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 29 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 200,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 1,268,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ Constituent Application; Public Lands Department The Nature Park at Bonneville will turn two and a half acres of unusable fire hazard into a small nature park for the surrounding residents. We have the support of SLC's Golf Division for this project (see Supporting Documents). The height of the fence from the driving range will be increased for safety. This area has been used by three generations of children in this neighborhood, but was recently fenced off for safety reasons. It has a large amount of dead wood, creating a significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area. We see evidence of "campsites" and drug paraphernalia left behind; as well as large piles of concrete and asphalt chunks, dead and broken trees from the golf course, and broken or obsolete golf course equipment. We propose the area be converted to a small nature park with a shredded bark walking path utilizing bark chips from dead wood processed from the area; three benches, access to water to establish drought-tolerant native trees, shrubs and pollinator plants (utilizing free or low-cost programs like the Utah Pollinator Habitat Program, currently offering 90-900 seedlings for free each September). This will require access to water but not an irrigation system. natural area on the northwestern side for our native wildlife habitat and protection. We will also work to protect the habitat of great horned owls and various hawks living in the area. We propose two entrances: (1) south end of 2200 East, (2) east side of Connor St. at property line to the course. There may also be a southern entrance from the golf course. The end result will offer a safe, natural area for both adults and children to enjoy nature and her wildlife such as great horned owls, red tailed hawks, deer, foxes, and other wild creatures losing habitat in our highly developed city. Staff Note: The “significant fire hazard to neighbors in the area” represents the constituent’s opinion and does not reflect a designation made by the Fire Department. An evaluation of the area would need to be completed by the Fire Department prior to assigning the level of fire risk. 72 Public Pet Memorial Constituent Application; Public Lands Department A statue, statues, or placemaking feature of pets on a public space. Radiating out from the placemaking feature will be memorial bricks, benches, and landscaping/trees etc. The bricks and landscaping can be sponsored by the public in memory of pet that person has lost. The bricks can be engraved with the pets name and put in the ground and area can grow over time. The landscaping or trees can have a small plaque listing the pets name and information. Adding a memorial/donation element will ensure that the memorial always continues to grow and is taken care of. Also drinking fountains for both humans and pets. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 30 Streets Impact Fees Class C (gas tax) 1/4 ¢ & 5th 5th Sales Taxes #Title, Lead Office, and Description Totals General Fund Funding Our Future (FOF) Parks Impact Fees Restricted Property Tax REQUEST 100,000$ CDCIP -$ MAYOR -$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST CDCIP -$ MAYOR 6,000,000$ 6,000,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST CDCIP -$ MAYOR 50,000$ 50,000$ COUNCIL -$ REQUEST 58,094,500$ CDCIP 25,969,000$ 7,000,000$ -$ 3,100,000$ 2,539,000$ 230,000$ 4,500,000$ 8,600,000$ MAYOR 34,884,000$ 4,680,879$ 3,463,036$ 3,100,000$ 8,863,400$ 430,000$ 4,652,515$ 9,694,170$ COUNCIL -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TOTALS Constituent Application; Transportation Division The 200/300 East block of Hubbard Ave (the block directly south of 900 S) desperately needs the city to implement traffic mediation devices to SLOW and potentially divert traffic from the very narrow street. The street is a 2-way street has approximately less that 14ft between parked cars. With the increased motor/vehicle/human traffic on the 9th South corridor, the 200/300 block of Hubbard Ave has seen an overwhelming increase in overflow activity and crime (I have saved footage from my security cameras). Recently, numerous residents of this block met to discuss possible solutions. Some of the solutions that were discussed were: speed humps, increased street lighting, and the possibility to chance the dual traffic flow to a one-way street. The general consensus of the Hubbard constituents are quite grateful of the city's involvement and vision with the 9th South Corridor. That said, there was also some resentment because the city hasn't given much consideration to the overflow "growing pains" of the 9th South Corridor. Some residents of the street have actually taken it upon themselves to purchase speed bumps and paint portions of the street to try and slow please note those actions were taken out of sheer desperation for the safety of our street and to protect the lives of many children that reside on our street. Numerous families on Hubbard Ave have reached out to our representative (Darin Mano, who is not seeking reelection) and city employees in the Division of Transportation. The only action Hubbard Ave has seen has been the removal of the constituent placed speed bumps. That has sent a message to many that the city is actually hearing complaints but are taking counterproductive measures that essentially make the street less safe. Any proactive measures taken to slow traffic and increase security and safety will be greatly appreciated. 75 76 Glendale Park Mayor Added Project, Public Lands Department This funding will help to advance Phase II improvements, which could include improvements in the center of the site or adjacent to the Jordan River, as identified in the Vision Plan. Design to confirm which amenities will advance in Phase II is now underway with construction anticipated to begin on Phase II in 2026. This funding will also be used for Glendale Park project contingency. Bike Racks Mayor Added Project, Transportation Division This funding will be used for the purchase and installation of new bicycle racks citywide with a focus near local businesses in high-demand areas to support cyclists and improve access to nearby shops and services. Funds will not be used for renewal or replacement. Fiscal Year 2027 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget 5/5/2026 Page 31 Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/3/2026 7:25 Anonymous Constituent Zoning Turf Allowance Proposal Hello, Though some of the public may be requesting to use artificial turf, I support continuing to ban artificial turf in back and side yards and would request that decisions regarding allowing the use of artificial turf be based on wider community input if possible. 6/3/2026 11:31 Brigitte Allison Eberly Phone call to City Council - D4 Vacancy Caller would like to leave her opinion on who she would like to fill the D4 vacancy - - During the last election, I voted for Clayton Scrivner, and I am sticking to that choice. He has been involved in the community and has lived in District 4 for a long time. He understands our neighborhoods, our areas, and our needs. He took the time to run in the last election and truly would do a great job. He did an interview about the unhoused, and I really like his stance on this issue. I am not a fan of ranked choice voting. I don't like that my vote moves from who I truly want to someone else. I have not heard from a Council Member who has been in District 4 for a very long time, since Derek K. I have felt like we haven't had someone in place who understands our area and cares. I hope the process will be fair and you will listen to the District 4 constituents. Please choose someone qualified who understands the community's needs. Thank you. 6/3/2026 11:39 Philip Carroll D3/ No to Proposed PU Rate Increase and other ideas Chris, Thank you for taking the time this week to listen to my concerns about the utility rate increase. Again, I want you to know that I support the city's efforts to maintain our infrastructure. My concern is the impact on our lower income residents and this large increase combined with the large increase last year. I have spent considerable time analyzing our city utility bills and the impact they will have on our properties. I appreciate the "rate calculator", once it is calibrated against an actual bill it works well. My analysis shows that for sewer alone our average increase for our 515 units in the city will be $24.00 PUPM. A major concern is housing affordability. This rate increase will be passed through to the tenants. We can debate that assumption but, in the end, it will be passed through making all rental housing less affordable. Yesterday I heard a presentation on housing affordability. Half of renters are overburdened, paying more than 30% of their income for housing. Half of these are paying 50%. As you consider this rate increases, please consider a more uniform application across all residential units. Separating out units 4 and below seems to me as odd and unnecessary. I particularly like the proposal to flat rate the sewer changes. I believe separating out sewer, at a flat rate, makes sense as with storm water and lighting. It creates predictability for managing our wastewater system. Finally, I have attached my own utility bill with the rate calculator and ask the question, why does our four-bedroom, two bath home in the Avenues have a new sewer rate of $29.26 while one of our one-bedroom units of about 600 sq/ ft. has a sewer rate for $48.94? Please let's create equity in the rate system. (Note that Carroll family MUST do much better managing our water consumption this summer.) Thank you. Phil Carroll 6/3/2026 11:45 Johanna Semon Phone call to City Council I would like to say thank you to the Mayor. She gets a lot of push back but has done a great job. She is a rockstar and a strong woman who is great at speaking up for us. No one like to have rates and taxes raise but we also need the city to continue to run. Thank you to everyone who works at the city and good job! 6/3/2026 16:48 Theo Dunham Budget Comment This is mister Dunham calling again. I just want to remind the mayor as she talks about all these budget things that they're doing right now. They're elected to use the money wisely. They are not elected to think of new ideas, suspend money, and, raise property taxes. It's tough enough to have the property taxes that we have without raising it every time somebody wants to do something special. Thank you. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/3/2026 16:50 Alvarez VINCE Budget Comment Hello. My name is Vicente Alvarez. I am a resident of in here of Salt Lake City in Central City at REDACTED Salt Lake City, Utah. A property owner as well in the city, paying property taxes. Here, you share my comments in regards to the twenty six twenty twenty seven budget. I find that preposterous after several council meetings that I've attended in person that you guys are still pushing for a budget that is providing a 15% increase to the largest expense that we invest on in the city already at a ridiculous level, which is the police for the police department. In particular, for additional surveillance through drone usage, which has been already been used to target, people ex ex exerting their constitutional right to protest. I find this preposterous after attending several meetings in which this budget and at the end prior, proposals for increase on policing were heavily challenged by all attendees and commentators. I don't understand why it is that the city council or Erin Mendenhall stop continue to avoid to listen to their constituents, in particular those from targeted and underrepresented communities such as us. Immigrants who are now scared more and more so at, things like the development of a new, detention center in here, the level of ICE presence in the state increasing and kidnappings in place, unconstitutionally taking, people, and how you guys feel comfortable proposing an increase on budget for the very tools that are used by the police to support ICE in these illegal activities. I am strongly against this proposal. I am strongly against anyone who supports this, and I keep an eye on actions of my representatives, including the council. Not on what they say, because I've attended plenty of council meetings where things are said and actionsarecom speak completely different to what you guys are doing. I I'm gonna keep an eye on this, and my voting will reflect this. My voting has reflected this and will continue to reflect this. We are up for election of a new council member in my district. Eva Lopez was found no longer eligible to represent us. Not that I believe that she did a great job. I've had personal conversations with her and with mayor Erin Mendenhall, that contradict that promise certain things that they are literally contradicting with the due budget proposal. And I'm keeping my eye out for that. And to be honest, seeing the 15% increase pass will will mean that will take note of this and make sure that you're not reelected again. It's preposterous that you guys continue to do this. No more. Oh, paying the phone, picking out the parking lot next door. We literally live by the police department, and we see the waste of tax money being invested on on these things. So no more. Thanks. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/3/2026 16:52 Olive Peterson Jacoby Budget Comment Hi. My name is Olive Peterson Jacoby. I live in Salt Lake City, Utah. And I'm calling today because I was unable to attend last night's city hall meeting. So I just wanted to express here that I am opposed to any, ordinances or legislations, bills, what have you, that would increase the police funding, for the coming year or, I mean, just for forever, basically. In particular, any money that would be put towards more drones or more overtime, additional canine units or equipment just across the board, anything that gives the cops more money and more tool wise Salt Lake City residents, I am opposed to. I'm also opposed to any, legislation, ordinances, laws, what what have you that would further criminalize homelessness. As we're entering the summer months, there is a real danger for anyone who is just living out on the streets of heat stroke, and dehydration, and the city should be looking to solve this problem, not criminalize it. I'm just very disappointed with what the city is doing, what the city council is doing right now. It seems they're forgetting that they are human beings, surrounded by other human beings, and are prioritizing honestly, I don't I don't know what, the the democratic establishment, it seems like when they should really be more concerned about the well-being of their fellow human beings. Yeah. I'd love to hear back. Again, I wasn't at the city council meeting, so if they struck down any ordinances or I think maybe finally voted on whether or not they were passing the ordinance that would further criminalize, like, camping in your car and whatnot. It'd be great to know. Just it'd be great to hear back from anyone, across the board. I hope whoever's listening to this has a good day, and I'd love to hear back from someone. 6/3/2026 17:00 Leticia Dornfeld Police Budget Proposal Good evening, As someone who works in Salt Lake City, I would strongly urge that the budget for the police not be increased. The budget is high enough as it is and doesn't need more. Thank you, Leticia Dornfeld 6/3/2026 17:01 Esiah Rodriguez Item G2. June 2nd Hello council, I put in a request to speak just before comments were closed, but I was permissed to speak. I wanted to reach out and say that I, as well as many other community members adamitly oppose spending more money on our already over inflated police budget. I have watched the work sessions and still draw blanks as to why the police need more resources when crime is literally dropping in SLC year over year. We are throwing money at our police force for the sake of throwing money away. Take the nearly 300,000 that this grant would give them and put it into something for the community. This grant is from the DOJ and comes with strings. Trump has proven he doesn't play by any rules set forth other than the ones he makes for himself. Sincerely, Esiah Rodriguez Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/3/2026 17:02 Rachel Whipple Support for Austin Taylor SLC Council District 4 I would like to add my support for Austin Taylor to fill the District 4 council seat. I have known Austin for many years. I first met him in the context of bicycling in Provo. My family had moved to downtown Provo because we knew that it would be close enough that we could walk or bike to everything that we needed, but I had no experience in riding a bike in an urban environment, especially not with small children. Austin helped me learn how to move through the city on two wheels with my kids in tow, and how to advocate for the modest but impactful changes in bike infrastructure and city culture so that it was safer for all families in Provo. Austin moved from the bike advocacy realm to city government, working in the development services department on a variety of issues, including parking, which is a perennial concern. He was able to quantify the excess of parking that we have in the downtown area, countering the unfounded perspective that parking is a scare resource. He did substantial good work in our city, even without the city investing significant resources to help him fulfill the assigned objectives. Austin has even gone through the rezoning process in Provo as an applicant, successfully petitioning the city to allow for a change in density of a parcel to allow for modest infill in a desirable neighborhood. Because Austin has worn all of these hats: an advocate, a city planner, and a citizen applicant, he has the broad range of personal experience that will make him an informed councilor. I would be happy to work with him on the Provo City Council, and I’m a little jealous that Salt Lake gets to have him. Thank you, Rachel Whipple, Provo City Council, District 5 6/3/2026 17:04 Ben Engel District 4 Representative Recommendation Hello beloved council My name is Ben Engel and I live at REDACTED in the historic Hollywood Condominiums. I'm a proud citizen of Salt Lake City and I need representation. I would like to recommend Austin Taylor. He has been the backbone of our Central City Neighborhood Council. When I was feeling like I was the only one who cared about my community, it was Austin and the CCNC that led me to see that I am not alone. He has empowered me to participate and express my care for my neighbors and community. Without Austin and the CCNC, I never would have come to see and understand how great you all are. That greatness includes our former District 4 City Council member, Eva Lopez Chavez. She was incredible when she first took office. I am sad that changed. I empathise with the discomfort and pain that it must have caused all of you. I sincerely hope you have frank and open conversations so that you can heal and find ways to prevent this sort of thing from happening again. It appears that the official reasoning helps to save on litigation, it also seems to sweep the more painful truth under the rug. Please, do not un-officially sweep this under the rug. You all deserve much better. You deserve to heal. The future deserves to have bad behavior called out and stopped immediately. I'm sorry you had to experience it. I'm sure that Austin Taylor would represent us responsibly and earnestly. I cannot think of anyone better suited for the position Thank You Ben Engel Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/3/2026 17:05 Susan Fleck District 4 City Council candidate Hello council members, I am writing you today to encourage you to fill the open seat in my district with Jennifer Starley. As a resident of District 4 for 24 years, I have seen our ever-evolving needs and challenges. Jenny Starley, of the 27 candidates, would best represent us and do so diligently and selflessly. Both my husband and I have been home owners here since 2002 and involved in many aspects of our community and really knowing our neighbors. We've raised children here who are now voting age (and the newly 18yr old is SO excited to be a voter) and have been observant eye witnesses to all that comes with living in District 4. Our family hopes you will choose Jenny Starly to be our rep. It's with the same weight for the big decision you must make, that I respectfully encourage you to not consider Austin Taylor for this seat. Having been involved with him here in our neighborhood and in a personal capacity with his family as neighbors, I feel he would not serve our district in a way that wouldn't be weighted with the fanaticism he has for the LDS church, his active disrespect for women and his entitled dismissive general behavior. I feel he would only advocate for the residents of this district if he and his church approved of any decision put before him. I doubt his ability to separate his zealousness for his faith from his duties as our rep. Austin could not be a solid representation of our diverse and wonderful district. Thank you for your careful consideration. Thank you again for giving us a chance to share our hopes with you. Sincerely, A proud district 4 family 6/4/2026 10:05 Susan Corth D3/Capitol Hill Arch Opposition A few constituents voice their concerns regarding the arch set to be constructed west of the Capitol, especially concerning its potential to change the landscape of nearby neighborhoods and parks. The residents also list concerns like the arch's size and lack of public input towards its construction. 6/4/2026 10:17 Craig Ogan D3/Crime Prevention Strategy Suggestion Constituent forwarded the Council Office and SLCPD an article discussing Baltimore's crime prevention strategies and suggested the council could implement some of the same strategies to combat SLC's rising crime rates. 6/4/2026 11:09 Damian Borbolla Concern Regarding District 4 Council Candidate Councilmember Dugan, My name is Damian Borbolla, and I am a property owner in your district (REDACTED). Since you are my City Council representative, I wanted to share a concern as the Council reviews candidates for the District 4 vacancy. Although I have not reviewed every applicant in depth, I am particularly concerned about one candidate who appears to be receiving support: Austin Taylor. While he seems knowledgeable in planning and development issues, I am troubled by several public statements he has shared on social media. Some of his posts promote personal beliefs about marriage, family, and religion in ways that feel out of step with Salt Lake City’s inclusive values. He has also amplified viewpoints from highly divisive political figures in our state and nationally. These patterns raise questions for me about whether he would represent the full diversity of District 4 residents and uphold the welcoming, pluralistic character of our city. I wanted to make sure you were aware of these concerns as you evaluate candidates. I hope the Council will support someone who reflects the values of our community and can represent all residents fairly. Thank you for your time and service. Damian Borbolla Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/4/2026 11:43 Lynn Pershing D6 / Rezoning 3 SF residential parcels to CB Good evening Dan I read the staff report on this proposed rezoning east of Foothill Dr on 1300 South “At this point, the applicant has not stated an intended use proposal for the property. However, it is anticipated that it would be developed in junction with adjoining properties to the south and would be used for multi-family housing or a mixed- use development” This area has a HIGH traffic pattern and site of many traffic accidents and likely future pedestrian/traffic accidents Entry and exit to any proposed housing development must be CAREFULLY REVIEWED erecting 18 condominiums and 8 townhouses is too dense for this property. Developer Promises for some units (3?) sale cost for persons less than 80% AMI is dubious. Cannot be trusted or guaranteed unless in contractual agreement with and enforcement by City We’ve all witnessed promises that haven’t been kept. The city MUST due diligence on this proposed project and report to the community councils impacted Thanks for your service Lynn K. Pershing, Ph.D. 6/4/2026 16:45 Matthew MEDURA budget The proposed property tax increase is a double whammy on top of the property value increases. Must we incur both? -- Matt Medura 6/4/2026 16:47 Jacquie Bernard Budget Dear Council Members, I am opposed to the extraordinarily large property tax increase proposed by the mayor, on top of the significant increases in fees for water, sewer and garbage, plus the very large tax increase adopted by the County. I think we should pause some of the discretionary spending until we can pay for it without large tax increases. I don’t know how much is proposed for the Green Line, for example, but it can certainly wait. Fixing up the City/County surrounding grounds can wait. Liberty Park and Pioneer Park upgrades are already underway—can they be revised to be less expensive? What administrative positions can wait? What “nice to have” stuff can wait? I don’t hate taxes—but this proposed increase is too much at this time and too much for those on fixed incomes or simply struggling to keep up in a bad economy. Jacquie Bernard 6/4/2026 16:49 Marsha Judkins Recommendation for Austin Taylor Salt Lake City Councilmembers, I am writing to recommend Austin Taylor for your District 4 City Council seat. I have worked with Austin for several years on community issues in Provo. Austin has proven himself as an effective leader both as city staffer and as a grassroots organizer and advocate. He understands city government and is passionate about serving his community. I would trust him to serve in this position and recommend him without reservation. Please reach out if you have any questions, Marsha Judkins 6/4/2026 16:50 Elizabeth Watson 2026/2027 Budget Dear Council Members, I urge you to eliminate any proposed increases to the property tax and cost of utilities for Salt Lake City residents. The cost of living already is too high in Salt Lake given previously approved utility rate hikes. The residents are having to tighten their budgets especially with the unpredictabilities in the price of gasoline and other commodities due to Federal actions. The Council needs to do the same. Sincerely, Elizabeth Watson Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/5/2026 8:50 Amy Jacobs Cottonwood Dog Park access bridge Hello I am writing to express my respectful comments regarding the closure of the footbridge connecting parking to the Cottonwood Dog Park in Fairpark/RosePark. This bridge has been in poor condition for several years, with City entities knowing it needed replacement rather than continued band aid repairs. Recently the bridge was closed due to safety concerns, without secured funding for replacement or a temporary solution while funding is secured. I have met with several community leaders, the Park council and community council members regarding access concerns for senior residents and dogs, and mobility challenged individuals and dogs and this restricting access to the Park to able-bodied residents and their able-bodied dogs. I urgently ask that funding be allocated to replace this brdige that has been on the "need to replace" list for several years. Please restore much needed access to all City residents and their companion animals by allocating needed funding to replace the bridge this fiscal year. 6/5/2026 9:41 Frances Lykins Van Buren Rezone - D2 Francis called to express opposition to the Van Buren rezone proposal. She is concerned with the Public Utilities infrastructure, parking and traffic issues that will arise with this number of units on this street. She will share her concerns with the Planning Commission. 6/5/2026 11:16 Austin Whitehead D4 Candidates Hey Erika, I'm a constituent and a Master's of City + Metropolitan Planning student at the University of Utah. I'm reaching out to offer my opinion on the vacant District 4 replacement. There are a number of quality candidates on the list; those that I am familiar with and would recommend include Tom Merrill, Brenda Scheer, Scott Lyttle, and Jennifer Napier-Pierce. I trust your judgement to make a good selection. That being said, I think selecting Ava Valdemoros would be a mistake. Regardless of her qualifications, the district deserves representation from someone fully invested in the district and the council deserves someone who is fully invested in the city. Selecting someone who just bought a house in Draper would be disingenuous, especially given the context of the vacancy. Thanks, Austin Whitehead 6/5/2026 11:42 Josh Lampson D5/ Parking Ticket Concerns Dear Council Member Carlsen, I am writing to you today as a resident of Ballpark to express my concerns regarding inconsistent parking enforcement/rules in our area. Two days ago, Paxton and Fremont avenues were barraged with parking tickets in a zone that we as neighbors have thought was unrestricted for quite some time. I’ve spoken to several of my neighbors and we were under the impression that in the absence of the Salt Lake Bees and while Ballpark NEXT initiative was underway, these restricted signs would not apply for the time being. In the year that I’ve lived here, I’ve never been tagged as a resident on Paxton. We are looking for some clarity and consistency. Would you be able to find out for us if the city intends to continue ticketing this area moving forward? It simply doesn’t sit well with taxpaying neighbors to have their cars ticketed seemingly out of the blue when in practice (and in what we thought we’d heard at recent community council meetings) this area hasn’t been patrolled in this manner for quite some time. We are open to petitioning the signage being taken down, but I think it would be wiser to see how all the new development around us might adjust the need to keep the signage down the road. I can understand if a neighbor had someone parking in front of their house who didn’t belong there, but that doesn’t seem to happen very much on this street. Thank you for your time and your continued dedication to our community. I look forward to hearing how we can work together to improve the parking situation in our neighborhood. Thank You, Josh Lampson Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/5/2026 15:39 Patrick EIKENS 999 Bicycle Hi. I'm a concerned resident from the Liberty Wells neighborhood. I was on the 9 nine nine bike ride yesterday night. That would have been, June 4. There was an absolutely concerning amount of police presence there, and they were just tackling people for, like, almost no reason, really. It was an extremely excessive abuse of force. I think that that is not something that we should allow in our communities, and it's just making more distrust in law enforcement and the the bike ride in anyone in the community. I do understand that there is kind of an necessity for law enforcement to work with large events like this, but in my personal opinion, this is not the way it should be done. It was an extremely egregious display of force for, like, almost no reason. People are getting closing off their bikes and getting tackled. You know, having cops, like, riot masks and stuff like that is just absolutely ridiculous, and there's no place for that in my community. 6/5/2026 15:55 Alessandro Rigolon Support for Tom Merrill for CD4 Dear SLC Council and Dan, As a resident of District 6, I support the candidacy of Tom Merrill for the vacant CD4 seat. I've met Tom several times, and I can really see his leadership and capacity. He's been doing great community work downtown, and as downtown grows, the area needs local representation, too. He's a father of two teenagers and knows what it takes to get families to stay (or return to) SLC. That's a goal of the mayor and of the council at large, and I'm confident Tom would do great in that regard. He'd also do great at representing downtown at a time of large transformative projects led by the state that seem more aimed at serving the broader Utah community than downtown residents themselves. Those residents need a voice, and Tom would be excellent in that regard. All the best, Alessandro Rigolon 6/7/2026 22:10 January Walker Sound Cameras In 2024 the City Council (as confirmed by Eva Lopez) passed budget for sound cameras to be installed along state street beginning at 200 S through 264 N State Street. It's been 2 years. Can you please confirm why the camera's have not been installed, and more than that simply have all the automated ticketing system sound camera's placed along state street? Each sound ticket is worth $50, and there are at least 100 sound violations a day which is $5,000 in revenue daily left on the table for taxpayers who deal with the noise nuisance. At 365 days that's $1,825,000 in dollars we are missing out on. Multiply that by two years and $3,650,000 has been left uncollected. That money can be used for so many things, like bikeways. Thank you for all you do. January Walker Salt Lake City Resident 6/8/2026 9:52 James Ogilvie D3/Property Tax Budget Comment Constituent responded to recent D3 budget proposal update to express concern that increasing property taxes and fees will create affordability problems for retired residents. 6/8/2026 12:36 Michael Juarez D3/SLC Hive Pass Constituent is concerned that cuts to the Hive Pass could impact residents' ability to get back and forth from work and participate in the community. He is asking that CM Wharton advocate for the Hive Pass to stay funded in the upcoming budget. 6/8/2026 16:59 Ben Throndsen 999 and new d4 rep Just curious why it too SLCPD so long to take action against the 999 "bike" ride, Citizens have been complaining for years. Seems like only something happened because chief redd was affected by it. Also district 4. Why can't the people that live here have a say? This vacated position is solely appointed by nobody that lives in said district and one candidate direct ties to the mayor and her husband 6/8/2026 17:00 Susan Fleck Upcoming district four selection Hello City Council, My name is Tim and I'm a long time district four resident. I'm writing to put my support behind Jennifer Starley for the seat. She would be an excellent choice to represent us. A candidate I do not feel is a good fit is Austin Taylor. He holds deeply conservative views in religion and other areas that make him an inappropriate selection to represent such a diverse section of our community. Thank you. Tim Spier Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/8/2026 17:01 Jennifer Starley Letter of Support for Austin Taylor: District 4 Vacancy Dear Salt Lake City Council Members, I am writing to express my support for Austin Taylor as a candidate for the District 4 City Council vacancy. As you know, I am also seeking appointment to this position. Although I remain enthusiastic about my own candidacy, I believe it is important to recognize other applicants whose commitment to Salt Lake City deserves acknowledgment. While I understand the Council’s decision must be based on the totality of each applicant’s qualifications, I wanted to share my firsthand experience working with Austin and my respect for his service to our community. Over the course of serving alongside Austin on the Central City Neighborhood Council, where he currently serves as Chair, I have been consistently impressed by his preparation, professionalism, and commitment to finding solutions that benefit residents. He takes his responsibilities seriously, comes prepared, and demonstrates a genuine desire to make our community stronger. Austin listens respectfully to differing viewpoints and engages in conversations in a way that helps build understanding and productive dialogue. In a city as diverse and dynamic as Salt Lake City, that ability to bring people together and focus on shared goals is an important leadership quality. What stands out most to me is his commitment to public service and his deep care for both District 4 and the city as a whole. He has invested significant time and energy in understanding the issues facing our community and consistently approaches those issues with thoughtfulness and integrity. Regardless of the Council’s final decision, I believe Austin would bring dedication, preparation, and a sincere commitment to serving residents. I appreciate his willingness to step forward and contribute his time, talents, and leadership to our community. Thank you for your consideration and for the time and effort each of you are investing in this appointment process. Respectfully, Jenny Starley Jennifer Starley District 4 Resident Vice Chair, Central City Neighborhood Council 6/8/2026 17:03 Rhianna Riggs District 4 Vacancy - Support for Jennifer Starley Hello, I am pleased to offer my wholehearted support for Jenny Starley. As the former Chair of the Central City Neighborhood Council, I have had the privilege of witnessing first hand Jenny’s unwavering commitment to her neighbors and to the broader community. In her role as Vice Chair of the Central City Neighborhood Council, Jenny has been a dedicated advocate for the issues that matter most to District 4 residents, including public safety, the equitable distribution of supportive resources, and affordable housing. She consistently works hard to ensure that the voices and concerns of her neighbors are heard and represented in city decision-making. Jenny combines thoughtful leadership, strong community engagement, and a genuine passion for public service. I am confident that she would excel in this role and make a meaningful and lasting contribution to both District 4 and the City as a whole. I strongly encourage her appointment to the Council. Thank you, Rhianna Riggs Central City Resident 6/9/2026 9:26 Bruce Pulver Phone call to City Council Bruce Pulver called to express his opposition to the proposed FY27 property tax and utility rate increases. During the call he stated: • Utilities consistently represent his largest monthly bill, • He will be required to pay more to SLC in taxes and fees despite not making more money as a retired person on a fixed budget, and • Wishes that SLC and the state would peruse a similar law that is being considered in Florida to exempt single family homes from paying property taxes. Mr. Pulver requested more information about where property taxes go. Austin will follow up with him with more information. Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/9/2026 10:04 Sandra Buendia Budget concerns As you consider approving the proposed SLC budget and utilities increases, please keep in mind that when all of these increases are combined it can be a real hardship on many of us. My combined utilities range between $300- $500/month--the lower end occurs when I don't turn on my heat or air conditioning. Please take into consideration the combined costs of increased utilities and the financial hardship it places on residents before approving these increases. It's a little deceptive to present the utility and tax increases as separate and "small" increases when, in fact, the combined costs can amount to an increase of $100+ per month per household. 6/9/2026 10:34 Bernie Hart The ethics of "good intentions".... and Institutional Laziness Good Morning, I will return to regularly attending Council sessions. In this email, I will state my concerns about the lack of urgency in how we go about the business of "doing good" and our efforts to help the most vulnerable mentally ill and addicted in our community. When it is my turn to speak, I will stand before you and say nothing ... knowing that you already are aware of my disappointment that no elected official appears interested in addressing the shortcomings of the current system. No need for an old man to go on and on when you all know what I am going to say, and I know that you know, that our "good intentions" are helping almost no one. I will be standing silently in front of the County and City Councils during general comments, reminding everyone that "intellectual laziness" is no longer an acceptable option. AI on the ethics of Good Intentions: The ethics of well-intentioned but harmful assumptions center on the tension between moral intent (desiring to do good) and impact (the actual harm caused). While good intentions reduce an agent’s moral culpability, relying on unexamined assumptions remains unethical when it reflects intellectual laziness, negligence, or an unwillingness to prioritize the welfare of others. [1, 2, 3, 4] And my unaddressed concerns: Page 43 Are the Valley Behavioral Health data collection outcomes on housing mentioned on the bottom of page 43 available? Pg 48 "Does the LA have an agency plan, as defined in the SUMH Office Directives, to address appropriate service provision for individuals with complex behavioral health conditions who require frequent engagement, have multiple systems involvement, and who are clinically indicated to need multiple mental health supports to remain in the community?" Yes for adults Yes for youth No, not at this time The answer given was "No, not at this time". Pg 48 references the people in our program. It has been difficult to find data we can compare our outcomes to. Page 120 Is the data for the 3rd District Mental Health Court outcomes available? And ... a quick NIH check shows little or no evidence that the efficacy of the NOMS outcome monitoring effort is supported by clinical studies: Key Elements of Integrated Care General medical settings can implement a range of care integration strategies somewhere on the spectrum between the complex, multi-component collaborative care Model and the simpler SBIRT model. While there is considerable interest in understanding which elements of integrated care models are essential to improving care delivery and patient outcomes, studies seeking to identify “key ingredients” have inconclusive results. Two meta-analyses of 37 collaborative care clinical trials published in 2006 suggested that employing a care manager with mental health training and frequent psychiatrist supervision of the care manager were associated with better patient outcomes.28,29 However, a 2014 meta-regression of 74 collaborative care clinical trials failed to identify an association between these or any other specific model elements and changes in patients’ depressive symptoms; systematic identification of patients with depression was associated with increase anti-depressant use.30 Pg 123 Coordinate with the Dept of Corrections to Provide Treatment Services to High-Risk Habitual Offenders (UCA 64-13-21(8)(a)). Thanks, Bernie Hart Understanding Us Taylorsville, Ut Date/Time Opened Contact Name Subject Description 6/9/2026 11:39 Shannon Woulfe D1/ Hive Pass inclusion in the Budget Councilmember Petro, I live at REDACTED, Salt Lake City, UT 84116. I work at Salt Lake Legal Defender Association. I use the HIVE pass to get to and from work and to and from court, as well as occasionally for other trips around town. My spouse and I own two cars and he works from home. Before I knew about the HIVE pass, I drove to and from work despite enjoying both the experience of riding public transportation and the benefits it provides to the community by me not driving to and from work (traffic, pollution). I had had a free UTA pass as a student and while working for the federal government, but when I started working at SLLDA, I resorted to driving again because I couldn't justify the cost of a monthly transit pass when I own a car and it is much faster and cheaper to drive (parking is free for me at the courthouse and at work). Then I learned about the HIVE pass and signed up. I have been using the HIVE pass for just over two years now. I take a lot of trips on transit because of it. I will discontinue doing so if the HIVE pass is cancelled. It simply does not make financial sense for me to buy a full cost pass when I own a car. However, I can't see how me driving to and from work and court would benefit our community at all. For those of us who live and work in SLC but whose employers do not offer a transit pass, it will result in more of us driving. We don't need the additional traffic and air pollution!! Please make room for it in the budget! Shannon 6/9/2026 13:49 Barbara Basmadjian Upcoming budget hearings Hi Dan, I hope your year is going well so far and you're not terribly impacted by the crazy weather we're experiencing. My CIP project is included in the FY27 Mayor's Recommended CIP Budget. It's titled Median Conversion to Parklet and is #64. This project has full support from the East Bench Community Council. In addition, I gathered over one hundred signatures, also in favor of the project, from residents on Skyline Drive, Wasatch Drive, Kensington Avenue, 1700 South, Foothill Drive and other nearby streets in District 6. I'm happy to speak about it at the upcoming budget hearing on Tuesday, June 2. The project means a lot to our neighborhood. Thank you for your support. And thank you for your continued support with DABS and the liquor store's HVAC noise problem. Kindly, Barbara Basmadjian 6/9/2026 13:51 Philip LoPiccolo Living Traditions Festival Dear Council Member Dugan - I wanted to send you a quick note to let you know how much I enjoyed attending the Living Traditions Festival this past weekend in Salt Lake City. I am so glad that the Smithsonian could play a small role in the success of this great Festival! Thank you for your leadership and support of the cultural arts. I also have to give a shout out to Felicia Baca and Laurel Cannon Alder. They did a fantastic job at organizing this and keeping everything running so smoothly. I appreciate their energy and dedication. What a great celebratory event. Congratulations! Let me know if there is anything you need from the Smithsonian. Pl Philip LoPiccolo Congressional/Cultural Liaison Smithsonian Office of Government Relations Smithsonian Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage