01/05/2021 - Formal Meeting - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
FORMAL MEETING
January 5,2021 Tuesday 7:00 PM
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Salt Lake City
Emergency Proclamation.
SLCCouncil.com
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Chris Wharton,Chair
District 3
Andrew Johnston,Vice Chair
District 2
James Rogers
District 1
Ana Valdemoros
District 4
Darin Mano
District 5
Dan Dugan
District 6
Amy Fowler
District 7
Generated:16:06:55
This meeting will be an electronic meeting pursuant to the Chair’s determination
that conducting the City Council meeting at a physical location presents a
substantial risk to the health and safety of those who may be present at the anchor
location.
The Salt Lake City Council Chair has determined that conducting a meeting at an anchor
location under the current state of public health emergency constitutes a substantial risk to the
health and safety of those who may attend in person.For these reasons,the Council Meeting
will not have a physical location at the City and County Building and all attendees will connect
remotely.
Members of the public are encouraged to participate in meetings.We want to make sure
everyone interested in the City Council meetings can still access the meetings how they feel most
comfortable.If you are interested in watching the City Council meetings,they are available on
the following platforms:
•Facebook Live:www.facebook.com/slcCouncil/
•YouTube:www.youtube.com/slclivemeetings
•Web Agenda:www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
•SLCtv Channel 17 Live:www.slctv.com/livestream/SLCtv-Live/2
If you are interested in participating during the Formal Meeting for the Public Hearings or
general comment period,you may do so through the Webex platform.To learn how to connect
through Webex,or if you need call-in phone options,please visit our website or call us at
801-535-7607 to learn more.
As always,if you would like to provide feedback or comment,please call us or send us an email:
•24-Hour comment line:801-535-7654
•council.comments@slcgov.com
More info and resources can be found at:www.slc.gov/council/contact-us/
Upcoming meetings and meeting information can be found
here:www.slc.gov/council/agendas/
Based on feedback we have received,we will be going back to our regular Formal Meeting
format.Public hearings will be heard in the order on the agenda followed by a general comment
session later in the meeting.
Please note:Dates not identified in the FYI -Project Timeline are either not applicable or not yet
determined.
WELCOME AND PUBLIC MEETING RULES
A.OPENING CEREMONY:
1.Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meetings.
2.Pledge of Allegiance.
3.Welcome and Public Meeting Rules.
4.The Council will approve the formal meeting minutes of Tuesday,November 10,
2020;Tuesday,November 17,2020;and Tuesday,December 1,2020.
B.PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1.Ordinance:Budget Amendment No.6 for Fiscal Year 2020-21
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that
would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment staffing
document,for Fiscal Year 2020-21.Budget amendments happen several times
each year to reflect adjustments to the City’s budgets,including proposed project
additions and modifications.The proposal includes funding to cover cost increases
to turn the historic Fisher Mansion Carriage House into a recreation hub,create a
redevelopment plan for the former Glendale Waterpark,and consolidate multiple
employee positions in different departments and add one new position to form a
new City Innovations Team,among other changes.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 5,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -Tuesday,December 8,2020
Hold hearing to accept public comment -Tuesday,January 5,2021 and Tuesday,
January 19,2021 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action -TBD
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
C.POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS:
NONE.
D.COMMENTS:
1.Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2.Comments to the City Council.(Comments are taken on any item not scheduled
for a public hearing,as well as on any other City business.Comments are limited to
two minutes.)
E.NEW BUSINESS:
1.Motion:Nomination of Council Chair and Vice Chair for Calendar Year
2021
The Council will consider a motion to ratify the election of Chair and Vice-Chair of
the Salt Lake City Council for calendar year 2021.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,January 5,2021
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 5,2021
Staff Recommendation -Suspend the rules and adopt.
2.Motion:Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location
The Council will consider a motion to ratify the determination that the Council will
continue to meet remotely and without an anchor location under HB5002.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,July 7,2020;Tuesday,August 11,2020;
Tuesday,September 1,2020;Tuesday,October 6,2020;Wednesday,October 28,
2020;Tuesday,November 17,2020;Tuesday,December 8,2020;and Tuesday,
January 5,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
F.UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1.Resolution:Funding Our Future:Transit Master Plan Implementation
Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority (UTA)
The Council will consider adopting a resolution that would authorize the Mayor to
enter into two proposed adjustments to an interlocal agreement (ILA)with UTA.
Amendment to Addendum No.2 provides accounting adjustments and credits to
the City for cost savings from COVID-19 related bus service reductions,reaching
service thresholds,and actual fuel costs.Addendum No.3 is the service agreement
from August 2020 to August 2021 for the Frequent Transit Service (FTN)routes
on 200 South,900 South,and 2100 South streets.The ILA is a twenty-year
agreement with a goal of full implementation of the Frequent Transit Network as
described in the City’s Transit Master Plan.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -Tuesday,December 8,2020
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 5,2021
Staff Recommendation -Refer to motion sheet(s).
G.CONSENT:
1.Board Reappointment:Police Civilian Review Board –Jessica Andrew
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Jessica Andrew to the
Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending November 21,2021.Jessica
recently moved to District One from District Seven.The board's District One seat
was recently vacated by Kevin Park who was term limited.The Administration is
recommending Jessica finish her first term in the now vacant District One seat.
FYI –Project Timeline:(subject to change per Chair direction or Council
discussion)
Briefing -n/a
Set Public Hearing Date -n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment -n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action -Tuesday,January 5,2021
Staff Recommendation -Approve.
H.ADJOURNMENT:
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 5:00 p.m.on _____________________,the undersigned,duly appointed City
Recorder,does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1)posted on the Utah Public
Notice Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701,and (2)a copy of the foregoing provided
to The Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any
others who have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda,including but
not limited to adoption,rejection,amendment,addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
People with disabilities may make requests for reasonable accommodation,which may include
alternate formats,interpreters,and other auxiliary aids and services.Please make requests at least
two business days in advance.To make a request,please contact the City Council Office at
council.comments@slcgov.com,801-535-7600,or relay service 711.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 1
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in an electronic Special
Formal Session on Tuesday, November 10, 2020 pursuant to the Chair
determination and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No. 2 of 2020
(2)(b).
The following Council Members participated electronically:
Chris Wharton Amy Fowler James Rogers
Andrew Johnston Daniel Dugan Darin Mano
The following Councilmember was absent:
Analia Valdemoros
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno,
Council Executive Deputy Director; Erin Mendenhall, Mayor; Rachel Otto,
Mayor’s Chief of Staff; Katherine Lewis, City Attorney; Sylvia Richards,
Council Public Policy Analyst; Nick Tarbet, Council Senior Public Policy
Analyst; Russell Weeks, Council Senior Public Policy Analyst; Benjamin
Luedtke, Council Public Policy Analyst; and DeeDee Robinson, Deputy City
Recorder participated electronically.
The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m.
A. OPENING CEREMONY
#1. Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal meetings.
#2. 7:16:20 PM Pledge of Allegiance. (A moment of silence was held
while the American Flag/Anthem was displayed on the screen)
#3. 7:17:13 PM Welcome and Public Meeting rules.
#4. 7:17:26 PM Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler
seconded to approve the Work Session meeting minutes of Tuesday,
September 15, 2020 as well as the Special Limited Formal meeting minutes
of Wednesday, October 28, 2020, which motion carried, all members present
voted aye (roll call). View Minutes
(M 20-3)(M 20-4)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Note: 7:21:11 PM Items B1 & B2 were heard as one public hearing
#1. Grant Application: Salt Lake Rotary Foundation – Furniture and
Supplies for Utah State Fairground YouthCity Site. The Council will
accept public comment for a grant application request from the Division
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 2
of Youth and Family Services to the Salt Lake Rotary Foundation. If
awarded, the funding would be used for furniture and supplies to set up
the new YouthCity site at the Utah State Fairgrounds. The Administration
intends to open this new site in mid-November to early December 2020.
View Attachment
#2. Grant Application: Child and Adult Care Food Program
Reimbursement for YouthCity Program Snacks. The Council will accept
public comment for a grant application request from the Division of Youth
and Family Services to the Utah State Office of Education. If awarded,
the funding would be used to reimburse the YouthCity Program for snacks
given to participants during the 2020-21 school year. View Attachment
Sylvia Richards, Council Public Policy Analyst, introduced the two
attached grant items.
Emily Alworth expressed support for both grant items.
Councilmember Dugan moved and Councilmember Mano seconded to close
the public hearing and refer Items B-1 and B-2 to a future Consent
Agenda, which motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(B 20-3)
#3.7:24:59 PM Ordinance: Fleet Block Zoning Amendments (300 and 400
West and between 800 and 900 South). The Council will accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would create a new land
use zone titled Form-Based Urban Neighborhood 3 (FB- UN3) and rezone the
10-acre City block known as the Fleet Block (located between 300 and 400
West and between 800 and 900 South) from Public Land (PL) and General
Commercial (CG) to FB-UN3. The area was previously used by the City for
a fleet maintenance facility that has since been relocated. Form-Based
code focuses on the form and appearance of buildings. It also has more
regulations that control those aspects of development than traditional
zones. The proposal would apply regulations to future developments such
as building design, height, bulk, use, and other development standards
and land uses. The regulations are intended to support the block’s
redevelopment. Consideration may be given to rezoning the property to
another zoning district with similar characteristics. Other sections of
Title 21A – Zoning may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition
No. PLNPCM2019-00277. View Attachment
Nick Tarbet, Council Senior Public Policy Analyst, introduced the
attached proposal. He said the Council had previously received comments
expressing concern regarding future development negatively impacting the
murals at this location and noted there were no immediate
impacts/development plans at this time. He added there would be future
opportunity for feedback regarding development of the property. He
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 3
specified this was the first of two public hearings.
7:35:25 PM Councilmember Wharton noted there was nothing in the
current zoning that was preserving the murals at this location and added
that his statement was not intended to influence any comments made
regarding the proposal.
CC Cummings, Jessy Salas, Michael Showalter, Tash, Grace Menzie,
Kendee Hamilton, Shawn Wilson, Rae Duckworth, Madeline Gearheart,
Beverly Hawkins, Misti Okimoto, Janet Alcala, Mike Zee, Natalie Blanton,
John Ause, Marvin Oliveros, Kay M., Mitch Poen, Nancy Johnson, Karen
Crow, Julie Cordell-Seamons, Lex Scott, and Alexis Athens provided
comments regarding the murals located on the Fleet Block. In summary,
comments included:
• Community involvement needed regarding development of property
(creation of a community advisory group);
• Artwork (murals) being therapeutic/sacred space/important place for
grieving/celebrating life for families/community and promoting
unity in the community;
• Rezoning the block would allow gentrification to continue;
• Transparency being important (current lack of transparency);
• Demanding the Council commit (despite any development) to keeping
murals on-site/protect murals at all costs;
• Communities needing places to congregate, organize events, etc.
that include public art;
• Fleet Block should not be used for high-cost housing (needing to
choose people over profit;)
• Destroying the murals being a monumental mistake, causing
devastating damage/impact to the community; and
• Suggested alternative uses for the property: community garden,
affordable housing, farmers market, and public park.
Nigel Swaby and Alixander Court provided comments in support of the
rezoning. In summary, comments included:
• Public/open space should be provided within the development
• Murals important to the community and should be preserved
• Current area was blighted
• City/Council performing due diligence regarding the property
Paul Johnson, Anne Charles, Emily Alworth, and Antonio BB provided
comments in opposition to the rezoning. In summary, comments included:
• Rezoning the block would allow gentrification to continue, taller
buildings, and high cost development;
• Proposing the block be converted to a park (area lacking green
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 4
space/trees);
• Suggesting an alternative zoning designation that would provide
development desired by the public; and
• More important to provide a space for the community to gather.
George Chapman suggested the Fleet Block become a park and
recommended the murals be an anchor point for a Black Lives Matter plaza
for public gatherings, shows, and protests.
Ashley Cleveland offered the Council alternative options for the
Fleet block: keeping the block zoned for public land/use as a public
park, tabling the rezone for a more appropriate time, choosing a new
block for development (not located on the 900 Street corridor), and
decrease scope of code change (break up the block/rezone smaller
portion).
8:10:18 PM Councilmember Wharton took a moment of personal privilege
to inform the public that Councilmember Valdemoros wanted her
constituents to know she would have been present at the meeting but was
unable to attend because she was recovering from the recent birth of her
child.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
close the public hearing and note a second public hearing has been
scheduled for November 17, 2020, which motion carried, all members
present voted aye (roll call).
(P 20-23)
#4.8:46:25 PM Ordinance: Congregate Care Text Amendment Additional
Recommendations. The Council will accept public comment and consider
adopting an ordinance that would create a land use classification to
address short-term housing for the terminally ill and seriously ill
(sometimes known as eleemosynary, residential support, group home,
assisted living facility, or congregate care facilities). The updated
proposal includes reviewing compatibility concerns for how this land
use, and others like it, would impact the adjacent residential
neighborhoods, particularly the Institutional Zoning District. Related
provisions of Title 21A – Zoning may also be amended as part of this
petition. Petition No. PLNPCM2016-00024. View Attachment
Mr. Tarbet introduced the attached proposal and specified this was
the first of two public hearings.
Anne Charles, Emily Alworth, and Alixander Court provided comments
in support of the proposal. In summary, comments included:
• Additional proposed housing was needed;
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 5
• Importance of ensuring care facilities followed all guidelines;
• Proposal allowing more access to housing for the disadvantaged; and
• Providing ability to accommodate more diverse establishments.
George Chapman spoke in opposition of the proposal and said assisted
living centers did not make sense in the middle of neighborhoods, and
congregate care facilities should be near commercial services (stores,
restaurants, etc.)
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
close the public hearing and note a second public hearing has been
scheduled for November 17, 2020, which motion carried, all members
present voted aye (roll call).
(P 19-1)
#5.8:54:40 PM Ordinance: Shared Housing Zoning Text Amendments
(formerly Single Room Occupancy or SROs). The Council will accept public
comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would amend various
sections of Title 21A of the Salt Lake City Code pertaining to Single
Room Occupancy (SRO) uses (to be called Shared Housing uses). The
proposed amendments would redefine what was previously Single Room
Occupancy (SRO) housing to Shared Housing, and defines it as a
residential building, or part of one, that contains smaller housing units
consisting of one or more sleeping rooms and contains either a private
kitchen or private bathroom, but not both. In the updated proposal, units
could contain multiple sleeping rooms, rather than limiting the unit to
one sleeping room. Other sections of Title 21A – Zoning may also be
amended as part of this petition. Petition No. PLNPCM2018-00066. View
Attachment
Russell Weeks, Council Senior Public Policy Analyst, introduced the
attached proposal and specified this was the second public hearing.
Nigel Swaby, Anne Charles, Emily Alworth, and Michael Showalter
spoke in support of the proposal. In summary, comments included:
• Single occupancy housing providing an important niche for low-
income population of the City;
• Proposal should be expanded to other areas of the City as well as
beyond Salt Lake City; and
• Properly managed shared housing allowing for a new
start/transitioning from homelessness.
Shelley Bodily, Paul Johnson, Ryan O’Mahony, Michelle Goldberg,
George Chapman, and Amy Hawkins spoke in opposition of the proposal. In
summary, comments included:
• Proposed housing/living style bringing more crime/negatively
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 6
impacting the Ball Park area of the City;
• Geographic limitations of the proposal being un-fair/equitable
(targeting low-income areas west of State Street and lacking
east/west geographical equity);
• Shared housing should be dispersed across the State/integrated into
every City;
• More beneficial to integrate shared housing into existing/newly
built apartment buildings (promoting more diversity/redistributing
equity of housing across the community);
• Proposed ordinance would discourage the building of high-density
housing in Salt Lake City (implement inclusionary zoning instead);
and
• Shared/low-cost housing causing increased loitering and
encouraging/enabling criminal behavior.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
close the public hearing and defer action to a later date, which motion
carried, all members present vote aye (roll call).
(P 19-5)
#6.9:13:23 PM Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 4 for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021. The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the
City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.
The proposal includes:
• $1.5 million as part of a proposed expansion to the Accelerator
program ($500 prepaid debit cards in direct aid to resident’s
ineligible for CARES Act stimulus checks);
• a new apprentice program pairing high school students and young
adults with City employees;
• additional funding for the enhanced YouthCity program;
• homeless camp clean-up funding;
• a downtown ambassadors program expansion into the Rio Grande
neighborhood and North Temple area;
• and other items. View Attachment
Benjamin Luedtke, Council Public Policy Analyst, introduced the
attached proposal and specified a second public hearing was scheduled
for November 17, 2020.
Nigel Swaby spoke regarding the downtown ambassador program
expansion and said it provided expanded reach of the program to other
areas of the City (assisting neighborhoods affected by crime/vagrancy).
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 7
Emily Alworth and Kay M. provided comments opposing the proposal.
In summary, comments included:
• Not enough funding provided for the Accelerator program;
• CARES money should not be funding homeless camp clean-up and the
downtown ambassador program; and
• Provide City-permitted homeless camping zones.
Anne Charles said she was in favor of the expansion of the
Accelerator program; however, she expressed concerns regarding homeless
camp clean-up funding (used to push people out/take their belongings)
and the downtown Ambassadors program (language regarding panhandling
stigmatizing homeless).
George Chapman said he was against funding Hogle Zoo utilities and
felt the proposed amendment needed more funding for additional police
officers. He suggested repurposing a portion of the prison tax for more
lateral police transfers to fully staff the Police Department.
Tash and Rae Duckworth said they opposed funding for homeless camp
clean-ups and priority should be made to provide shelters/needed
resources (restrooms, healthcare, mental health resources, job
placement, etc.).
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
continue the public hearing to Tuesday, November 17, 2020, which motion
carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(B 20-11)
#7.9:28:20 PM Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 5 for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021. The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the
City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.
The proposal includes:
• accepting $7.1 million in U.S. Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) CARES Act grants which will be awarded to specific
community organizations through a separate, open, and competitive
process;
• adding temporary lighting near homeless resource centers;
• repairs to City sidewalks damaged during the September 8
windstorm;
• demolition of the Glendale water park;
• $20.5 million from the next issuance of the $87 million voter-
approved Streets Reconstruction Bond;
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 8
• and other items. View Attachment
Mr. Luedtke introduced the attached proposal and specified this was
the first public hearing and a second public hearing/briefing was
scheduled for November 17, 2020.
George Chapman spoke about the Animal Services Contract (including
the Raccoon Abatement Program) needing to be better publicized, temporary
lighting proposal should be made permanent/more extensive (near resource
centers), and funding should be provided for more cop-cams/camera
installations for adjacent businesses near resource centers.
Emily Alworth said more clarity/accessibility was needed regarding
materials provided for the proposed amendment (for public to understand
what was proposed), budget for the Vice Presidential debate being too
high (tax-payers should not be footing the bill), and the description of
the Refuse Packers (Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueled delivery systems)
was confusing/disappointing coming from the Sustainability Department.
Tash said the Housing & Urban Development (HUD) funding portion of
the proposal should go to legitimate community organizations (Wasatch
Front, Rose Park Brown Berets, etc.) to ensure funding went directly to
the community, the Glendale waterpark space should be provided to the
community as a park, and requested more clarification regarding the
Streets Reconstruction Bond (what it was to be used for).
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Johnston seconded to
continue the public hearing to November 17, 2020, which motion carried,
all members present voted aye (roll call).
(B 20-12)
C. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS
#1.9:36:15 PM Ordinance: Rezone and Master Plan Amendment at 833
South 800 East (Telegraph Exchange Lofts). The Council will consider
adopting an ordinance that would amend the zoning map and future land
use map for property located at 833 South 800 East. If approved, the
property would be rezoned from R-2 (Single & Two-Family Residential)
zoning designation to RMF-45 (Moderate/High-Density Multi-family
Residential). The future land use map designation would change from “Low-
Density Residential” to "Medium/High Density Residential”. The applicant
also owns the adjacent property at 847 East 800 South (the Telegraph
Exchange Building). Under the proposal, the two properties would be
consolidated into one parcel for the development of 23 residential units.
Consideration may be given to another zoning district with similar
characteristics. Petition No. PLNPCM2019-01110 and Petition No.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 9
PLNPCM2019-01111. View Attachment
9:36:31 PM Councilmember Wharton read a statement from Councilmember
Valdemoros in her absence regarding negotiation with the developer to
retain three new affordable housing units for the next five years.
9:38:35 PM Councilmember Mano made a statement regarding the issue
of additional residential density being appropriate for this location.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
adopt Ordinance 50 of 2020, subject to the Administration entering into
a development agreement with the applicant which includes the following
conditions: 1) Provide three two-bedroom townhome rental units at 80%
area median income for a period of not less than five years from the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy, 2) Height of the townhome
building will not exceed 30 feet.
Councilmember Mano proposed an amendment to the motion to include
a third condition: Limiting the total number of units to 23 on this
property and the adjacent property. Council Members Rogers and Fowler
accepted the amendment.
Councilmember Mano proposed an additional amendment to the motion
to add additional language to the second condition to include: “excluding
parapets”. Council Members Rogers and Fowler accepted the additional
amendment, which motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll
call).
(P 20-22)
D. COMMENTS
#1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
There were no questions.
#2.9:44:42 PM Comments to the City Council.
Councilmember Wharton re-stated the rules of decorum and public
comment rules.
Rae Duckworth spoke regarding the Fleet Block murals and expressed
concerns that if the block was rezoned, it would be sold to developers
for the City to profit off those who were deceased at the hand of police
officers. She also said the Council/police needed to stop harassing
unsheltered/homeless and suggested the Council provide individual
outreach to the unsheltered.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 10
Melinda McIlwaine and Nancy McHugh spoke about the Inland Port
(Board). In summary, comments included:
• Concern for increased air pollution;
• Buildings in the Port were built unsustainably; and
• Suggesting the City conduct a human health risk assessment before
any further development was made (in view of global warming and the
intent to make a zero-emissions City).
Kelly Martensen said the United States was responsible for the
killing of 62 Million un-born babies (abortion), Roe vs. Wade was being
codified by the President/Vice President elect, and abortion needed to
end now.
Alixander Court spoke about a large/dangerous pothole on 200 South
& Edison Street, and commended the Council on their solutions for the
homeless population.
Marvin Oliveros said he wanted to dedicate his two minutes for a
moment of silence for police brutality victims and houseless residents
who had died from lack of City support.
Nicole Taylor said the Council needed to listen to the community,
and that the Fleet Block murals were meaningful to the community/families
of victims.
Jeff Bair expressed concern that other speakers used the general
comment period to speak on public hearing items, as well as concerns
regarding speeding vehicles on 400 East (creating dangerous conditions),
and suggested Councilmember Mano attend the December Liberty Wells
meeting to discuss the issue.
Emily Alworth suggested more transparency/clarity and comprehensive
community outreach regarding agenda items addressed by the Council during
Council meetings (complex language - lack of understanding from general
public).
George Chapman spoke about the addition of 10 additional Police
Officers (Budget Amendment No. 5), Utah Transit Authority (UTA)
implementing service decreases on bus routes and said UTA needed to use
CARES Act funding and recent tax increases to implement one-dollar bus
fares.
Tash spoke regarding issues surrounding homelessness (deserving
basic human rights), pothole needing to be fixed (previous speaker’s
concern), speed limit sign needed on 400 East (previous speaker’s
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 11
concern), abortion being a woman’s choice (previous speakers concern),
and inquired about the legalization of marijuana in Utah.
Anne Charles spoke about the Telegraph Exchange Lofts (833 South
800 East) and said the three affordable units for five years was not
long enough, and that three out of 23 units was not enough.
Michael Showalter spoke about deaths caused by police officers (24%
of all gun related deaths in 2019), homeless camp clean-ups, and
suggested funding for health care/affordable housing for the homeless.
Jesse Salas said more resources (social workers) should be provided
for the unsheltered population, homelessness stemmed from the opioid
crisis in Utah, and the legalization of marijuana would allow
relief/alleviate issues of the opioid crisis.
E. NEW BUSINESS
NONE.
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE.
G. CONSENT 10:15:07 PM
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
adopt the Consent Agenda except for Item #4 (appointment of Marie Bambo
to the Police Civilian Review Board), which motion carried, all members
present voted aye (roll call).
#1. Ordinance: Dockless Shared Mobility. The Council will set the
date of Tuesday December 1, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. to accept public comment
and consider adopting an ordinance that would regulate the use of
electric scooters and other dockless, shared mobility devices in the
City. The Council would also consider amending the Consolidated Fee
Schedule as part of the dockless shared mobility device ordinance.
Currently, dockless scooter companies operate under temporary operating
agreements until an ordinance is passed. The latest version of a draft
ordinance was sent to the Council in March 2020. The updated ordinance
incorporates some feedback and concerns including additional
requirements for safety features, insurance requirement changes, and
language to better differentiate between scooters and devices – motorized
or otherwise – used by individuals with reduced or specialized mobility,
among other changes. View Attachment
(O 20-12)
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 12
#2. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board – Perry
Bankhead. The Council will consider approving the appointment of Perry
Bankhead to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending September
4, 2023. View Attachment
(I 20-32)
#3. Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board – Tonya Allred
The Council will consider approving the appointment of Tonya Allred
to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending September 4, 2023.
View Attachment
(I 20-32)
#4. (Item Pulled) Board Appointment: Police Civilian Review Board
– Marie Bambo. The Council will consider approving the appointment of
Marie Bambo to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending
September 4, 2023. View Attachment
(I 20-32)
#5. Board Reappointment: Police Civilian Review Board – Catalina
Pilar Cardona. The Council will consider approving the reappointment of
Catalina Pilar Cardona to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term
ending September 5, 2022. View Attachment
(I 20-32)
#6. Board Reappointment: Police Civilian Review Board – Rebekah
Myers. The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Rebekah
Myers to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term ending September 5,
2022. View Attachment
(I 20-32)
#7. Board Reappointment: Human Rights Commission – Shauna Doumbia
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Shauna
Doumbia to the Human Rights Commission for a term ending December 30,
2024. View Attachment
(I 20-20)
#8. Board Reappointment: Historic Landmark Commission - Robert
Hyde. The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Robert
Hyde to the Historic Landmark Commission for a term ending October 4,
2024. View Attachment
(I 20-31)
The meeting adjourned at 10:16 p.m.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2020
20 - 13
______________________________
Council Chair
______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as
additional discussion may have been held; please refer to the audio or
video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the
official minutes of the Salt Lake City Formal Session held November 10,
2020.
dr
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 1
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in an electronic Formal
Session on Tuesday, November 17, 2020 pursuant to the Chair’s
determination and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No. 2 of 2020
(2)(b).
The following Council Members were in virtual attendance:
Chris Wharton James Rogers Andrew Johnston
Daniel Dugan Darin Mano Amy Fowler
The following Councilmember was absent:
Analia Valdemoros
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno,
Council Executive Deputy Director; Erin Mendenhall, Mayor; Rachel Otto,
Mayor’s Chief of Staff; Katherine Lewis, City Attorney; Nick Tarbet,
Council Senior Policy Analyst; Robert Nutzman, Council Administrative
Assistant; Amanda Lau, Council Public Engagement/Communications
Specialist; Cindy Lou Trishman, City Recorder; and Scott Crandall, Deputy
City Recorder were also in virtual attendance.
The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m.
A. OPENING CEREMONY
#1. 7:06:31 PM Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal
meetings.
#2. 7:06:49 PM Pledge of Allegiance. (A moment of silence was held
while the American Flag/Anthem was displayed on the screen)
#3. 7:08:04 PM Welcome and Public Meeting rules.
#4. 7:08:21 PM The Council will approve the Work Session meeting
minutes of Tuesday, July 14, 2020 and Tuesday, August 18, 2020 as well
as Formal meeting minutes of Tuesday, October 6, 2020. View Minutes
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Dugan seconded to
approve the minutes, which motion carried, all members present voted
aye (roll call).
(M 20-4)(M 20-3)
#5. 7:09:15 PM The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial
resolution with Mayor Mendenhall declaring November 20th as Transgender
Day of Remembrance in Salt Lake City. View Attachment
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 2
7:12:51 PM The resolution was read by Councilmember Wharton after
which it was presented to Candice Metzler, Transgender Education
Advocates (TEA) of Utah; Dallas Rivas, Transgender Education Advocates
(TEA) of Utah; Kevin Randall, Blackbird Communication; Samantha Taylor,
Utah LGBTQ+ Chamber of Commerce; and Jonathan Foulk, Utah Pride Center.
The recipients commented on the importance of remembering/honoring Rita
Hester and thanked the Council for the resolution.
Councilmember Mano moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to adopt
Resolution 38 of 2020, which motion carried, all members present voted
aye (roll call).
(R 20-1)
#6. 7:21:30 PM The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial
resolution with Mayor Mendenhall recognizing December 1st as World AIDS
Day in Salt Lake City. View Attachment
(R 20-1)
The resolution was read by Councilmember Mano after which it was
presented to Jared Hafen, Utah AIDS Foundation. Mr. Hafen thanked the
Council for the resolution and continued support.
Councilmember Fowler moved and Councilmember Johnston seconded to
adopt Resolution 39 of 2020, which motion carried, all members present
voted aye (roll call).
(R 20-1)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:26:51 PM
Note: Comments/materials submitted to the City Council have been
attached as part of the official record. Click link to view.
https://www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meeting-comments/
#1. 7:30:04 PM Ordinance: Congregate Care Text Amendment Additional
Recommendations
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would create a land use classification to address short-
term housing for the terminally ill and seriously ill (sometimes known
as eleemosynary, residential support, group home, assisted living
facility, or congregate care facilities). The updated proposal includes
reviewing compatibility concerns for how this land use, and others like
it, would impact the adjacent residential neighborhoods, particularly
the Institutional Zoning District. Related provisions of Title 21A Zoning
may also be amended as part of this petition. Petition No. PLNPCM2016-
00024. View Attachment
Councilmember Wharton introduced the attached proposal.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 3
Jared Arvanitas said he joined the meeting just to listen.
Emily Alworth and Anne Charles said they supported the proposal and
felt it would be a valuable community resource.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Mano seconded to close
the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 51 of 2020, which motion carried,
all members present voted aye (roll call).
(P 19-1)
#2. 7:34:32 PM Ordinance: Fleet Block Zoning Amendments (300 and 400
West and between 800 and 900 South)
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would create a new land use zone titled Form-Based Urban
Neighborhood 3 (FB- UN3) and rezone the 10-acre City block known as the
Fleet Block (located between 300 and 400 West and between 800 and 900
South) from Public Land (PL) and General Commercial (CG) to FB-UN3. The
area was previously used by the City for a fleet maintenance facility
that has since been relocated. Form-Based code focuses on the form and
appearance of buildings. It also has more regulations that control those
aspects of development than traditional zones. The proposal would apply
regulations to future developments such as building design, height, bulk,
use, and other development standards and land uses. The regulations are
intended to support the block’s redevelopment. Consideration may be given
to rezoning the property to another zoning district with similar
characteristics. Other sections of Title 21A – Zoning may also be amended
as part of this petition. Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00277. View Attachment
Councilmember Wharton took a moment of personal privilege to read
a statement about the proposal. Comments included Council Members
listening to community members comments/requests (area being a community
gathering place, wanting space to be saved/secured for future, meeting
with advocates/family members of people depicted in the murals and
sharing those conversations with the full Council), wanting area to be
more than apartments/businesses, continued interaction with Council
Members, Council’s ongoing desire to ensure open space/parks as part of
future block development (area continuing to be a community gathering
space), and committing to work with community to ensure space was
designed correctly.
Jennifer Bruno introduced the attached proposal and specified this
was the second public hearing. She said the Administration responded to
questions raised by the Council during a prior Work Session and a follow-
up briefing would be scheduled to review responses and consider potential
options moving forward.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 4
Beverly Hawkins, Mary Castellanos, Rae Duckworth, Gina Thayne,
Derek Dyer, Jessy Sala, Janet Alcala, Tim Dwyer, Kain Kutz, Tash, Kristin
Knippnberg, Ashley, Nora Lang, Arturo Gamboa, Antonio BB, Marvin Oliveros
(Save Murals), Ethan Shaw, Maggie Kutz, and MaryAnne Rojas spoke about
the proposal. Comments included:
• out-of-control policing, racial equity, defunding police, police
brutality, encampment issues/harassment;
• murals being a path to broader healing, community resource, grass
roots community center, building safer communities (vital community
connection);
• destruction of murals being a tremendous loss, postpone development
for further analysis;
• community needing to gain trust with City officials, shirking
responsibility, respecting victims, recognizing ongoing need for
change;
• honoring lives/loved ones (murals providing lasting memories);
• creating a community advisory committee;
• creating green/open space around murals; community input,
innovation/adaptation, downsize scope of rezone;
• fear of block being developed for profit, not allowing
gentrification to continue, maintaining current zoning;
• condemning white supremacy, bringing back people of color;
• proposal lacking transparency; and
• alternative uses needed for property (community garden, affordable
housing, public park/farmers market).
8:18:31 PM Councilmember Johnston moved and Councilmember Mano
seconded to close the public hearing, which motion carried, all members
present voted aye (roll call).
(P 20-23)
#3. 8:19:34 PM Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 4 for Fiscal Year
2020-21
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the
City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.
The proposal includes:
• $1.5 million as part of a proposed expansion to the Accelerator program
($500 prepaid debit cards in direct aid to resident’s ineligible for
CARES Act stimulus checks);
• a new apprentice program pairing high school students and young adults
with City employees;
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 5
• additional funding for the enhanced YouthCity program;
• homeless camp clean-up funding;
• a downtown ambassadors program expansion into the Rio Grande
neighborhood and North Temple area;
• authorizing the third round of CARES Act funding the City may receive
in the coming weeks to cover payroll expenses in the Fire Department
and 911 Department;
• and other items. View Attachment
Benjamin Luedtke introduced the attached proposal and specified
this was the second public hearing.
Rhonda Uber, Rae Duckworth, Tash, Marvin Oliveros, and Sarah Stone
spoke about the proposal. Comments included need for restrooms/washing
facilities for unsheltered community, camp cleanups, prohibiting the
County Health Department from raiding camps (ban police participation),
providing long-term solutions, housing/job placement, increasing
harassment/loitering/property damage, and funding Downtown Ambassadors
(assisting downtown businesses).
Councilmember Wharton talked about the rules for speakers to provide
their full names and said those wishing to speak anonymously needed to
use the phone line.
8:32:36 PM Councilmember Fowler moved and Councilmember Rogers
seconded to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 52 of 2020,
amending the FY 2020-21 final budget of Salt Lake City including the
employment staffing document as requested by the Administration (see
motion), which motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(B 20-11)
#4. 8:34:09 PM Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 5 for Fiscal Year
2020-21
The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting an
ordinance that would amend the final budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Budget
amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the
City’s budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications.
The proposal includes:
• accepting $7.1 million in U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
CARES Act grants which will be awarded to specific community
organizations through a separate, open, and competitive process;
• adding temporary lighting near homeless resource centers;
• repairs to City sidewalks damaged during the September 8 windstorm;
• demolition of the Glendale water park;
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 6
• $20.5 million from the next issuance of the $87 million voter-approved
Streets Reconstruction Bond;
• and other items. View Attachment
Benjamin Luedtke introduced the attached proposal and specified
this was the second public hearing. He said the Administration was
preparing a revised recommendation which would be transmitted to the
Council. He said action on the item was scheduled for December, 2020.
Marvin Oliveros said he would defer his time.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
close the public hearing and defer action to a future date, which motion
carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(B 20-12)
#5. 8:36:53 PM Ordinance: Demolition of Dangerous or Boarded
Buildings
The Council continue to accept public comment and consider adopting
changes to the City’s Demolition ordinance. The proposed changes are
intended to streamline the process for demolitions on commercial and
residential properties, remove the requirement for a replacement use,
landscape plan and bond, and provide clarity to the enforcement process
for boarded buildings. Chapters 18.48, 18.64 and 2.21.030 of the Salt
Lake City Code will be amended as part of this proposal.
*Note, a previous agenda occurrence incorrectly listed Chapter 18.84
instead of 18.48. View Attachment
(O 20-16)
Nick Tarbet introduced the attached proposal and specified two
public hearings had been held.
Janet Hemming spoke about how proposed regulations could
potentially destroy historic/treasured homes/neighborhoods throughout
the City.
Nigel Swaby spoke in support of the proposal but thought an
alternative option would be to have a “nuisance demolition” ordinance.
Cindy Cromer talked about requirements being over burdensome and
filling the landfill with demolished structures (being wasteful). She
said it was important to achieve a balance and asked the Council to
reevaluate the effects/results of proposed changes in two years.
8:42:38 PM Councilmember Mano moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded
to close the public hearing and adopt Ordinance 53 of 2020 and further
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 7
moved to adopt the following legislative intents as outlined in the Staff
Report.
Councilmember Rogers made a friendly amendment to revisit the issue
in two years to assess the status of the legislative intents (pros/cons).
Council Members Mano and Fowler accepted the amendment. Councilmember
Wharton called for the question, which motion carried, all members
present voted aye (roll call).
(O 20-16)
C. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS
None.
D. COMMENTS
#1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
There were no questions.
#2. 8:44:30 PM Comments to the City Council.
Rae Duckworth, Tash, Michael Showalter, and Marvin Oliveros
reiterated public comments made during Item B2 (Fleet Block) and Item B3
(Budget Amendment No. 4).
Jessy Salas thanked the Council for adopting the Transgender Day of
Remembrance resolution and talked about how much that meant to the
Transgender community.
MaryAnne Rojas talked about the need for additional community health
centers to help underserved/vulnerable members of the community (City
officials needing to listen to and address community issues).
E. NEW BUSINESS
#1. 8:58:59 PM Motion: Meeting Remotely Without an Anchor Location
The Council will consider a motion to ratify the determination that
the Council will continue to meet remotely and without an anchor location
under HB5002. View Attachment
Councilmember Johnston moved and Councilmember Mano seconded to
adopt the motion, which motion carried, all members present voted aye
(roll call).
(G 20-9)
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 8
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
G. CONSENT 8:59:50 PM
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Johnston seconded to
approve the Consent Agenda, which motion carried, all members present
voted aye (roll call).
#1. Resolution: 2020 Salt Lake City Water Conservation Plan
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 7:00
p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting a resolution that
would adopt the Department of Public Utilities’ 2020 City Water
Conservation Plan. The updated plan was developed per the State’s
Conservation Plan Act, in addition to other State and regional guidelines
and industry best practices. Guidelines for plan development, as well as
requirements in the conservation plans, include:
• Water supply;
• Historical water demand;
• Water conservation goals;
• Conservation program information; and
• Adoption or approval by each water provider's governing body.
The State Conservation Plan Act requires all water providers with
more than 5,000 connections to submit a water conservation plan to the
State every five years for review and approval. Implementation of the
Water Conservation Program is included in the Public Utilities proposed
budget each year. View Attachment
(T 20-5)
#2. Ordinances: Creating an Appeal Hearing Officer System by
Repealing Civil Service Commission and Employee Appeals Board
The Council will set the date of Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at 7
p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting two ordinances:
1. One would repeal City Code Chapter 2.16 (the Civil Service
Commission ordinance), amend the entirety of City Code 2.24 (the
Employee Appeals Board ordinance) and replace both the Civil Service
Commission and the Employee Appeals Board with an appeal hearing
officer system.
2. One would enact Chapter 2.98 Competitive Merit-based Recruitment
and Promotion Processes in the Fire Department and the Police
Department.
The numbering of City Code 2.24 would remain the same, however the
entire text would be replaced with the new hearing officer system for
all eligible employee appeals. View Attachment
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2020
20 - 9
(O 20-18)
#3. Board Reappointment: Planning Commission – Andres Paredes
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Andres
Paredes to the Planning Commission for a term ending June 16, 2023. View
Attachment
(I 20-9)
#4. Board Appointment: Transportation Advisory Board – Paul
Schulte
The Council will consider approving the reappointment of Paul
Schulte to the Transportation Advisory Board as a representative of the
School District for a term ending September 25, 2023. View Attachment
(I 20-6)
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
______________________________
Council Chair
______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as
additional discussion may have been held; please refer to the audio or
video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the
official minutes of the Salt Lake City Formal Session held November 17,
2020.
sc
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 1
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in an electronic Formal
Session on Tuesday, December 1, 2020 pursuant to the Chair determination
and Salt Lake City Emergency Proclamation No. 2 of 2020 (2)(b).
The following Council Members participated electronically:
Chris Wharton Amy Fowler James Rogers
Andrew Johnston Daniel Dugan Darin Mano
The following Councilmember was absent:
Analia Valdemoros
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council Executive Director; Jennifer Bruno,
Council Executive Deputy Director; Erin Mendenhall, Mayor; Rachel Otto,
Mayor’s Chief of Staff; Katherine Lewis, City Attorney; Brian Fullmer,
Council Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst; Samuel Owen, Council Public
Policy Analyst; Benjamin Luedtke, Council Public Policy Analyst; and
DeeDee Robinson, Deputy City Recorder participated electronically.
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m.
A. OPENING CEREMONY
#1. 7:05:03 PM Council Member Chris Wharton will conduct the formal
meetings.
#2. 7:05:21 PM Pledge of Allegiance. (A moment of silence was held
while the American Flag/Anthem was displayed on the screen)
#3. 7:06:11 PM Welcome and Public Meeting rules.
#4. 7:06:30 PM Councilmember Dugan moved and Councilmember Fowler
seconded to approve the formal meeting minutes of Tuesday, October 20,
2020, which motion carried, all members present voted aye, except
Councilmember Johnston who was absent for the vote (roll call). View
Minutes
(M 20-3)
#5. 7:07:31 PM The Council will consider adopting a joint ceremonial
resolution with Mayor Mendenhall in support of creating the Fairpark
Public Market in partnership with the State of Utah and Salt Lake County.
View Attachment
Councilmember Rogers read the resolution.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 2
The resolution was presented to David Lewis, Chairman of the Board
of Utah State Fairpark Corporation, and Larry Mullenax, Executive
Director of Utah State Fairpark Corporation.
Councilmember Rogers moved and Councilmember Fowler seconded to
adopt Resolution 40 of 2020, which motion carried, all members present
voted aye, except Councilmember Johnston who was absent for the vote
(roll call).
(R 20-1)
B. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Note: Comments/materials submitted to the City Council have been attached
as part of the official record. Click link to view.
https://www.slc.gov/council/virtual-meeting-comments/
#1. 7:20:43 PM Ordinance: Street Vacation Near 800 North and Warm
Springs Road. The Council will accept public comment and consider
adopting an ordinance that would close a portion of 800 North Street
adjacent to I-15 and Warm Springs Road. The applicant owns the property
to the north and proposes that the vacated area will be split between
the owners to the north and south. The closure will not impact traffic
or access. The subject right-of-way is no longer used as a roadway and
is generally unoccupied. Petition No. PLNPCM2019-00824. View Attachment
Brian Fullmer, Council Constituent Liaison/Policy Analyst,
introduced the attached proposal.
Dewey Regan, Nate Secrist, and Lynn Wall (property owner to the
south) indicated they were present only to listen.
Councilmember Mano moved and Councilmember Johnston seconded to
close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting, which
motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(P 20-24)
#2. 7:24:37 PM Resolution: 2020 Salt Lake City Water Conservation
Plan. The Council will accept public comment and consider adopting a
resolution that would adopt the Department of Public Utilities’ 2020
City Water Conservation Plan. The updated plan was developed per the
State’s Conservation Plan Act, in addition to other State and regional
guidelines and industry best practices. Guidelines for plan development,
as well as requirements in the conservation plans, include:
• Water supply;
• Historical water demand;
• Water conservation goals;
• Conservation program information; and
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 3
• Adoption or approval by each water provider's governing body.
The State Conservation Plan Act requires all water providers with more
than 5,000 connections to submit a water conservation plan to the State
every five years for review and approval. Implementation of the Water
Conservation Program is included in the Public Utilities proposed budget
each year. View Attachment
Samuel Owen, Council Public Policy Analyst, introduced the attached
proposal.
Cindy Cromer spoke in support of the proposal and referenced
information regarding the Water Maps Program (Page 4-35), and said she
looked forward to reading the document without “draft” stamped on every
page.
Anne Charles spoke regarding wanting to ensure accurate reporting
within the plan, high water usage in the City, and the utilization of
native/low water use plants/planting.
George Chapman expressed concerns regarding the plan needing more
flexibility with residents who wanted to conserve water (reducing
landscape/park strip planting requirements) and eliminating the need for
Zoning Enforcement citations regarding lack of landscaping.
Emily Alworth said rebates/cost initiatives encouraged residents to
be involved and more funding/effort should go to Demonstration Garden &
SLCWise; however, the information on the website was outdated, and
suggested collaboration with local horticulturalists to help guide up-
to-date information.
Councilmember Fowler moved and Councilmember Rogers seconded to
close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting, which
motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(T 20-5)
#3. 7:35:00 PM Ordinance: Dockless Shared Mobility. The Council will
accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance that would
regulate the use of electric scooters and other dockless, shared mobility
devices in the City. The Council would also consider amending the
Consolidated Fee Schedule as part of the dockless shared mobility device
ordinance. Currently, dockless scooter companies operate under temporary
operating agreements until an ordinance is passed. The latest version of
a draft ordinance was sent to the Council in March 2020. The updated
ordinance incorporates some feedback and concerns including additional
requirements for safety features, insurance requirement changes, and
language to better differentiate between scooters and devices – motorized
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 4
or otherwise – used by individuals with reduced or specialized mobility,
among other changes. View Attachment
Mr. Owen introduced the attached proposal.
Ado Milicevic, Mackenzie Viau, and Alex April provided comments in
support of the proposal. Comments in summary included:
• Scooters helping to fill transportation gaps;
• Prioritizing safety and implementing best practices;
• Commitment to ensuring scooters were properly parked and not ridden
on sidewalks; and
• Support for hybrid fee structure (upfront fee & .10 cent per trip)
Dave Iltis expressed concerns regarding the proposal, including:
parking limitations (where scooters/shared mobility could park) being
more restrictive than automobiles, no bike lanes provided on ¾ of City
streets (100 South, State Street, etc.), and the need for insurance
limits to be codified in the ordinance.
George Chapman suggested the City allow bicycle riding on downtown
sidewalks and said scooters should not be allowed in the City until they
were required to have speed limiting switches (reducing speed to 5 miles
per hour).
Mike Christensen indicated he was present only to listen.
Councilmember Mano moved and Councilmember Dugan seconded to close
the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting, which motion
carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(O 20-12)
#4. 7:49:23 PM Ordinances: Creating an Appeal Hearing Officer System
by Repealing Civil Service Commission and Employee Appeals Board. The
Council will accept public comment and consider adopting two ordinances:
1. One would repeal City Code Chapter 2.16 (the Civil Service
Commission ordinance), amend the entirety of City Code 2.24 (the
Employee Appeals Board ordinance) and replace both the Civil Service
Commission and the Employee Appeals Board with an appeal hearing
officer system.
2. One would enact Chapter 2.98 Competitive Merit-based Recruitment
and Promotion Processes in the Fire Department and the Police
Department.
The numbering of City Code 2.24 would remain the same, however the
entire text would be replaced with the new hearing officer system for
all eligible employee appeals. View Attachment
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 5
Benjamin Luedtke, Council Public Policy Analyst, introduced the
attached proposal and indicated the Council would vote on the item at
the December 8, 2020 meeting.
George Chapman spoke in opposition of the proposal and suggested
the ordinance needed further analysis/buy-in from Public Safety
employees. He added the proposal would encourage more employees to leave
Public Safety (already down 50 employees) and expressed concern that the
burden would lie with only one person (eliminating Civil Service
Commission & Employee Appeals Board).
Anne Charles indicated she was present only to listen.
Councilmember Fowler moved and Councilmember Dugan seconded to
close the public hearing and defer action to a future meeting, which
motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll call).
(O 20-18)
C. POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS
NONE.
D. COMMENTS
#1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
There were no questions.
#2. 7:55:06 PM Comments to the City Council.
Councilmember Wharton read the modified rules for general comments
and reiterated the rules of decorum.
Arthur Sandack indicated he did not have any comments at this time.
Yvette Melby-Garcia requested the City consider enacting a
law/ordinance to restrict open carry (firearms) in public parks/public
spaces, after experiencing an uncomfortable/threatening situation at
Sugar House Park with individuals carrying guns (threatening violence).
Councilmember Wharton said this would be an issue regulated by State
law and said Staff could provide the appropriate contact information.
8:07:19 PM Councilmember Wharton said the Mayor had suggested Ms.
Melby-Garcia file a police report for a potential hate-crime and/or
reported to the FBI as hate-rhetoric.
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 6
Anne Charles expressed support for the Fairpark Market initiative
and concerns regarding information pertaining to Raise Up SLC (unable to
find information on how to apply or who would qualify).
Dave Iltis spoke regarding issues concerning the Council’s website
for agenda/agenda materials (needing to be fixed for mobile viewing –
creating technology barriers), the City’s plan for use of downed trees
from windstorm (avoid sending to landfill), and 2200 West being an
environmental tragedy (wet lands destroyed, too many warehouses).
George Chapman suggested the City collaborate with the County
(animal services) regarding re-implementation of pet licenses for
seniors, additional lighting and mobile cop-cams were needed at resource
centers and reducing diesel truck pollution (from idling) was needed.
Emily Alworth spoke regarding City/Council website accessibility
and said all citizens of Salt Lake City needed better access to the
information which would lead to a more informed public.
Councilmember Johnston took a moment of personal privilege and said
he wanted more specific information on website access issues that the
public was experiencing. Jennifer Bruno said Staff would be following up
with the individuals to find out more about their difficulties accessing
information on the City’s website.
Lisa Hazel expressed concerns regarding City street lighting (too
bright), and that her requests to Public Utilities for low-color
temperature bulbs, had not been answered. She said this issue was
important for wildlife and insects in general.
E. NEW BUSINESS
NONE.
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
#1. 8:17:39 PM Ordinance: Police Officer Body-worn Cameras. The
Council will consider adopting a new ordinance for the Police
Department’s use of body-worn cameras. The Police Department has policies
for body-worn camera use and there have been executive orders relating
to footage release. Currently, however, there is not a City ordinance
that standardizes the policy direction. This is part of a multifaceted
approach the City is taking to examine internal systems and identify
paths toward better accountability and equity. View Attachments
Councilmember Mano moved and Councilmember Dugan seconded to adopt
Ordinance 54 of 2020, enacting Chapter 2.10.200 Regulating the Police
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL FORMAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1, 2020
20 - 7
Department’s Use of Body-worn Cameras, further moving that the Council
adopt the following legislative intent:
• It is the intent of the Council that the Administration explore
additional mechanisms to increase transparency and accountability as
it relates to the regular auditing of body camera footage and that
future modifications may be made to the ordinance to codify these
mechanisms, which motion carried, all members present voted aye (roll
call).
(O 20-19)
G. CONSENT
NONE.
The meeting adjourned at 8:19 p.m.
______________________________
Council Chair
______________________________
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as
additional discussion may have been held; please refer to the audio or
video for entire content pursuant to Utah Code §52-4-203(2)(b).
This document along with the digital recording constitute the
official minutes of the Salt Lake City Formal Session held December 1,
2020.
dr
Item B1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget Analysts
DATE:January 5, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY21
MOTION 1 – CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council continue the public hearing to Tuesday, January 19.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
COUNCIL.SLCGOV.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke and Sylvia Richards
Budget and Policy Analysts
DATE:January 5, 2021
RE: Budget Amendment Number Six FY2021
________________________________________________________________________________
Budget Amendment Number Six includes requested changes to four funds. Total expenditures are $1,810,804 including
$63,673 from Fund Balance. There are a total of seven items, five of which are new items in Section A. The sixth is a
Housekeeping item in Section D. The seventh is a Council-added item in Section I. Additionally, this budget amendment
includes the transfer of six employees from the General Fund to the IMS fund and the creation of one additional position
within the IMS Fund. The Administration is requesting a straw poll on the Housing-related Funding Our Future
Applications. (See Item I-1 Council-Added Item.) The Administration indicates that all seven of these budget
items are time-sensitive.
General Budget Updates
The Administration anticipates updated sales tax revenues for October and Comprehensive Annual Finance Report
(CAFR) confirmed Fund Balance numbers will be available to share with the Council at the January 5 briefing.
The City received $150,000 from the County for a third round of CARES Act funding. The Administration plans to include
in an upcoming budget amendment the $150,000 and a reconciliation of the second round of CARES Act funding.
The President has not decided whether to declare a disaster for the September windstorm. The March earthquake did not
qualify for FEMA reimbursements to the City. However, individual and household assistance is available up to $938,506.
279 applications have been submitted at the time of publishing this report. FEMA’s website for the earthquake disaster is
available here: https://www.fema.gov/disaster/4548
The Administration provided the following status update on insurance claims and payments for earthquake damage to
City buildings: “The City received a $2,000,000 advance payment from the property insurance carrier for earthquake
damages. Once the City’s expenditures for repairs exceed $2,100,000 ($100,000 deductible + claim
advance), we can submit those expenses for reimbursement.”
Project Timeline:
Set Date: December 8, 2020
1st Public Hearing: January 5, 2021
1st Briefing: January 5, 2021
2nd Briefing: January 12, 2021 (if needed)
2nd Public Hearing: January 19, 2021
Potential Action: TBD
Page | 2
Revenue Update
The Administration indicates that they are seeing a decrease in revenue budget due to trends for apartment units, new
business license and business license renewals. Due to the administrative order for COVID, parking ticket revenue shows a
decrease of nearly $500k due to only 51,000 pay station transactions through the end of August (normally well over 200k).
This decrease is also having an effect on citations written. Additionally, Justice Court fines are down $37,000, while moving
violations are down $151,000. In Charges and Services, field reservation fees are down $273,000 while auto parking fees
are also under budget. Miscellaneous revenues are also down due to a decrease in special events and the elimination of take-
home vehicle fees during the current pandemic.
Page | 3
Fund Balance Update:
This fund balance projection includes a line item adding in funding budgeted for use for expenses associated with COVID-
19 in the fiscal year 2020 that was not spent.
Page | 4
Impact Fees Update
The Administration provided a summary of impact fee tracking, details on refunding amounts and dates and lists of
unfinished projects with impact fee funding. The information is current as of December 1, 2020. $88,479 of police impact
fees are scheduled to expire by the end of this fiscal year. The Administration reports the impact fee consultant is
finalizing the police section update and transmittal to the Council Office is anticipated in early 2021.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $732,533 More than a year away -
Parks $6,404,154 More than a year away -
Police $318,626 December 2020 $9,155
Transportation $3,623,027 More than a year away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Section A: New Items (note: to expedite the processing of this staff report, staff has included the
Administration’s descriptions from the transmittal for some of these items)
A-1: Fisher Carriage House Exploration Center Construction Overage ($540,732 – CIP Impact Fees)
See Attachment 1 for renderings of the Fisher Mansion Carriage House redevelopment project
In FY20 CIP, the Council approved $1,098,764 of parks impact fees for this project which is in addition to $280,000 from
the Chevron donation (2010 oil spill in Red Butte Creek). The total approved budget for the project was $1,378,764. The
new funding request represents a 58% increase for a new total project budget of $2,172,496. If approved, then the
available to spend balance of parks impact fees would be $5,610,422.
Council staff asked the Administration if the impact fee consultant had confirmed using $253,000 of parks impact fees to
purchase indoor furnishings and equipment. It was determined these expenses are for items with a useful life less than 10
years and ineligible for parks impact fees. As a result, this request was reduced from $793,732 to $540,732. It’s unclear
how the $253,000 will be funded or if scope reductions can deliver the project within the approved budget.
The Administration’s transmittal indicates the following: “As design development nears completion, SLC Engineering and
the consulting architect, CRSA, have updated budget projections for the project. Unfortunately, those cost projections
have increased significantly from the original budget estimate created in 2018 based on a preliminary conceptual design.
This budget amendment requests the additional funding necessary to implement the project, which (if funded) would go
to bid in December 2020 and be constructed in 2021. Increased costs for the project are associated with all project
elements, but particularly relate to the preservation of historic windows and doors, interior finishes, necessary plumbing
and electrical upgrades, unforeseen utility upgrades and increased cost for proposed furnishings associated with the public
exhibit space”.
This project is eligible for up to $100,000 from the CIP Cost Overrun Account. In previous discussions the Council
expressed a preference to spend impact fees before General Fund dollars because impact fees must be spent within six
years or refunded to the developer with interest.
According to the Administration, “The project scope includes construction of an exploration center at the historic Fisher
Carriage House that provides standing exhibits on the natural and cultural history of the Jordan River and surrounding
area, and which showcases a beautiful restored historical structure. The exploration center will provide space for activities
and education programs, places for visitors to engage with city staff and partners and get information about the Jordan
River Parkway Trail and water trail. The center will also provide a home-base for outreach & education staff with the SLC
Trails & Natural Lands Division, from which they can conduct programming up and down the Jordan River. Additionally,
the project will compliment an adjacent boat ramp (construction planned for winter 2020) and create a recreational
jumping-off point for the future Folsom Trail, the Jordan River Parkway Trail, and the Jordan River 'Paddle Trail”.
The Administration would also like to let the Council know about future costs associated with the project. The two new
employee positions and the ongoing costs listed below are anticipated to be needed for the FY23 annual budget based on
the current project timeline.
Future Ongoing Costs
FTE Site Manager & Part-time Assistant $ 90,000.00
Supplies and Materials $ 20,000.00
Page | 5
Kayak Rental Fleet (One-Time) $ 10,000.00
Facility Maintenance Costs $ 18,238.00
Grounds Maintenance Costs $ - *
TOTAL $ 138,238.00
* In Trails Natural Lands budget
Policy Questions:
$253,000 Indoor Furnishings Unfunded – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for funding
recommendations and/or scope reductions to address the $253,000 of indoor furnishings that are ineligible for
parks impact fees.
Fisher Mansion Redevelopment – The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration if redevelopment of
the Fisher Mansion should be prioritized instead of the Carriage House given the project cost increases. During
FY20 CIP, the Administration had a general cost estimate of $3.7 million to redevelop the Fisher Mansion. Note
this cost may have increased due to damage from the March earthquakes. The Administration anticipates detailed
Fisher Mansion redevelopment scenarios to be available mid-2021 such as public-private partnerships,
nongovernmental organization operated facility models and City-operated models. The scenarios could inform a
new Request for Information (RFI) for the mansion.
A-2: Glendale Water Park Redevelopment Plan ($225,000 – CIP Impact Fees)
The Administration’s transmittal indicates the following: “Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment for $225,000
in parks impact fees to hire a consultant to create a Development Plan for Glendale Water Park, a Land and Water
Conservation Fund (LWCF) site. A recent community survey found slightly more than half of the 3,700 respondents
supported new uses on the site. The Development Plan would articulate a long-term community supported vision for the
site with phased implementation.” Full restoration of the water park may be cost prohibitive at over $20 million but reuse
of some components may be feasible.
According to the Administration, the first phase, (to be determined with the input of public feedback) would implement
active recreation on site within the three-year LWCF requirement. The clock begins once the State LWCF official inspects
the site which is currently on hold due to the pandemic. The City will receive a letter confirming the three-year deadline to
restore public access to the site. A violation of the conservation easement could result in denial of future federal funding
grants to the City and/or a court action by the National Parks Service to require active outdoor recreation access.
The resulting redevelopment plan will be considered a small area plan. A draft will be presented to and reviewed by the
Planning Commission in an open and public meeting. Then the Council will be briefed, review and have the opportunity to
adopt, modify and adopt or decline the plan.
As indicated by the Administration in their transmittal,
“The 17-acre water park site located along the Jordan River is adjacent to two park sites, a golf course, the surplus
canal and natural areas along the Jordan River… The benefits or goals of the project would include the following:
Creating a plan that unifies these public amenities through connecting trails, unifying landscape character and the
development of complementary recreation uses into a regional asset. Developing the water park site within the
context of the more than 210 acres of public lands would foster positive activation and creating a dynamic
community asset. Because this site was private for so long, the development will essentially create a new park,
added to the City’s park inventory, with new service to residents and is impact fee eligible. In the time of a
pandemic and political divisions, it is more important than ever to invest in dynamic public spaces that connect
people and break down demographic and economic divides. The Glendale property is a unique opportunity to
create a very special place the supports economic development, public health, a sense of community, and
environmental sustainability as well as increase confidence in city government’s use of public funds.”
Project Tasks may include but not limited to:
• Analyze the site and surrounding context: opportunities and constraints
• Facilitate community and stakeholder engagement: community support
• Define the Park Vision: Community vision and goals
• Develop conceptual site plan alternatives: Explore development alternatives and cost estimates. Include
analysis of alternative plan operations and maintenance requirements and cost estimates
• Develop Final Site Development Plan
• Develop an implementation plan that includes plan phasing and funding strategies
• Facilitate adoption by City Council.
Page | 6
The Administration shared the following general timeline for project based on annual quarter (for example “Q1” is first
quarter from January 1 – March 31):
Q1 Engage a consultant
Q2 Engagement Window #1: Foundation of Understanding
Share background on the project site and City goals
Gather information from the community about what kinds of activities they would like to see
and priorities
Understand how they see the park playing a role in their neighborhood, community, city and region
Present engagement results to Council
Q3 Engagement Window #2: Visioning Glendale
Present preliminary site improvement vision for feedback
Targeted engagement and city department collaboration
Initial strategy recommendations development
Present engagement results to Council
Q4 Final Community Engagement Window #3
Sharing of the draft plan
Focus on next steps of implementation
Planning Commission Review
Council hearings
Q5 Plan adoption by Council
Policy Question:
Small Area Plan Early Council Input – The Council may wish to ask the Administration when the Council will be
able to provide early policy input on the small area plan similar to the master plan process.
A-3: Trailhead Property Acquisition ($275,000 – CIP Impact Fees)
The Administration is requesting $275,000 of Impact Fees to purchase land for a trailhead. The Administration is
prepared to provide additional details of the property in a closed session.
A-4: City Innovations Team ($63,673 - General Fund/$453,399 – IMS Fund)
See Attachment 2 for the Chief Innovation Officer job description
The Administration’s transmittal indicates the following: “Salt Lake City Administration is looking to take transformational
steps with regards to enterprise technologies and improved business practices. To do this the development of a team is
required, this team will be known as the City Innovations Team. The team initially will be built upon existing resources
from the Mayor’s Office, Public Services, IMS, and Community and Neighborhoods. This team will take on larger enterprise
projects like the new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) effort.”
The Administration states the team’s services will be available to all General Fund departments with a goal to increase
service levels over time. The team will be located on the fifth floor of Plaza 349. No additional costs are needed to make that
office space ready. One new FTE position, a second strategy & special projects manager, is requested for a total of seven
FTEs on the team. The total annual cost for the new FTE is $106,348 but this request is for $63,673 or seven months of
funding. One of the Public Services Department deputy director positions will be removed from the staffing document.
Public Services will have two deputy director positions after this change. A new title and FTE, Chief Innovations Officer, will
be created on the staffing document for IMS. The total annual cost for the Chief Innovations Officer is $220,500. See
Attachment 2 for the job description.
The team will also improve coordination and resources between the Civic Engagement Team and IMS Media Services. A
further step to improve engagement is to combine SLC Media Services and the Civic Engagement Team into a city-wide
communications/engagement team in the Information Management Services (IMS) which is an internal service
department. As indicated in the transmittal, “Currently, departments work with both teams separately to develop
engagement and communications strategies for projects. Both teams also co-manage SLCgov social media accounts. By
combining the groups, the City can create a one stop shop for engagement & communications efforts.” The proposal also
includes operational costs associated with the team. The positions include:
Public Services:
Chief Innovations Officer – Nole Walkingshaw transfer FTE Deputy Director position
Strategy & Special Projects Manager – Alyssa Johnson transfer FTE Strategy & Special Projects Manager
From Community and Neighborhoods:
Civic Engagement Team – Four FTE’s transferred from Community and Neighborhoods
Page | 7
o Elizabeth Buhler, Civic Engagement Manager
o Kyle Strayer, Civic Engagement Program Specialist
o Christianna Johnson, Civic Engagement Program
Specialist
o Ronnie Buttons, Special Projects Assistant
New Position:
Strategy & Special Projects Manager
Policy Questions:
In addition to the ERP effort, will there be other projects this group tackles in its first year?
From a longer-term perspective, will this team be similar to an internal service for all City departments? Or will that
be project or service dependent?
Back when the Civic Engagement Team was initially created, it was anticipated that they would provide support and
engagement work for both branches of government. As the group launched and the Council Office’s communications
work evolved, there has been a different but successful way that the groups coordinate. Will the future Innovations
Team, and specifically engagement staff, continue to be available to extend and collaborate on the Council
engagement efforts?
A-5: Police Department Hiring Class ($ -0- General Fund)
See Attachment 3 for the Administration's memo about this request.
The transmittal indicates the following: “The Administration and the Police Department are seeking Council support for
the hiring of a police recruit class in January or February of 2021. The Police Department is not seeking additional funding
but will use current budget for fully funded positions and attrition savings from the first six months of the year”.
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources Section
(None)
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources Section
(None)
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Airport Interim Financing ($ -0- Airport Fund)
The Administration’s transmittal indicates the following: “Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA) plans to issue
interim financing up to $300 million in the form of either Commercial Paper backed by a Letter of Credit or a revolving
Line of Credit directly with a bank. We are currently in procurement and are negotiating the terms of the agreement which
we deem to be favorable especially considering the low interest rate environment. These funds will ultimately be refunded
with long term debt, but we will maintain the facility for upwards of three years to help with financial flexibility on the
Airport Redevelopment Project. These funds can be used for operating and maintenance expenses or to fund construction
costs as determined by the Airport Finance division”.
If the Council approves this request, then the Administration will transmit a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale
of bonds not to exceed $300 million. A public hearing must be held after the resolution is approved and following public
notice of the bonds issuance per state law. Council staff is working with the Administration to understand the time
sensitivity of the resolution in January.
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
(None)
Section F: Donations
(None)
Section G: Council Consent Agenda – Grant Awards
(None)
Section I: Council Added Items
I-1: Housing-related Funding Our Future Applications (time-sensitive) Straw Poll Request
The Administration has indicated that two categories of applications received fewer funding requests than what the
Council approved in the FY21 annual budget, and two categories received more funding requests. The Administration is
requesting a straw poll from the Council to approve a shift of the unallocated $797,000 to unmet Incentivized Rent and
Page | 8
Vulnerable Populations needs.
CATEGORY TOTAL BUDGET TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTED
IN APPLICATIONS
Community Land Trust $500,000 $0
Landlord Assurance Program $350,000 $53,000
Incentivized Rent Assistance $900,000 $2,323,512
Service Models for the Most Vulnerable
(children experiencing homelessness
and individuals with mental illness)
$200,000 $725,380
The $900 billion pandemic relief bill approved by Congress (pending presidential action at the time of writing this staff
report) includes an extension of the national eviction moratorium through January 31, 2021 and $25 billion in rental
assistance, however, it’s unclear how those funds will be distributed / accessed by landlords and renters. Utah is estimated
to receive $214 million.
The public facing website www.fundingourfutureslc.com provides the following program descriptions:
Community Land Trust (CLT): make homes perpetually affordable. There are currently 9 properties in the
CLT. The program reduces the cost of home ownership significantly, decreasing the purchase price of a home by
removing the land cost from the total mortgage price.
Landlord Assurance Program: works to mitigate perceived risks related to renting to low-income clients. Agency
will recruit eligible landlords, provide tenant financial assistance, landlord financial assistance, and provide
tenant education.
Incentivized Rent Assistance: continue to fund an assistance program to stabilize low-income renters using best
practices and an outcome-based approach, to help prevent homelessness.
Service Models for the Most Vulnerable: support housing programs for individuals with mental illness and
children experiencing homelessness.
Policy questions:
Outreach to Applicants – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how would potential applicants have
learned about the Funding Our Future housing programs and how to apply? The Council may also wish to ask if
how many applications were received in prior fiscal years for these programs.
Status of Community Land Trust – The Council may wish to ask the Administration for a status update on the
City’s Community Land Trust and how the model compares to others around the nation.
Balance of Other Housing Budgets – The Council may wish to ask the Administration if the other Funding Our
Future budgets for FY21 have been spent or if funds remain that could be recaptured for urgent housing
assistance.
Connecting Applicants with Other Funding Sources – The Council may wish to ask the Administration how
applicants are connected with other funding sources from the City, County, State, Federal (such as HUD Grants)
when Funding Our Future budgets are less than applicant’s requests.
I-2: HUD-CV Emergency Services Grant for the Temporary Winter Shelter ($750,000 – ESG-CV Grant)
A request was made through the City’s modified mid-year HUD Cares Act funding cycle for $750,000 to fund the
operating costs at the temporary winter shelter. The shelter, which is located on North Temple, will be operated by
Switchpoint.
The Council may recall that in a previous budget amendment, the City received a round of Cares Act funding ($7.1 million)
that would be set aside for a modified mid-year CDBG-type process. The Council appropriated the money, but it has been
held while the Administration publicized the funding availability and received applications from community organizations
for the grant funds for COVID-related services.
The Administration has transmitted the funding log with recommendations from the Mayor and Community Development
and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) Board. However, we are requesting that the item for Switchpoint be pulled
out and considered separately in order to ensure the operating costs for the temporary shelter are in place as quickly as
possible.
Page | 9
Funding: Some questions may arise related to the funding partners for the temporary winter shelters. In addition to this
funding request for $750,000, the Administration has shared this public funding breakdown:
State ESG-CV funding, $525,000, operations, Millcreek and SLC Airport Inn.
County ESG-CV funding, $234,320, operations, just Millcreek.
There is also a private contribution related to security expenses at the Millcreek and Salt Lake City locations.
Overall ESG Projects: The Council may also have questions about the remainder of the ESG funding availability. The
log for those items is included in Attachment 4 and will be scheduled for a full briefing as soon as possible. The full
briefing would include the remainder of the ESG funding requests, plus the other CDBG funding requests. As a note,
based on this $750,000 request and the other applications that were received, there would be $460,828 in funding
remaining for future discussion.
Policy Questions:
The Council may wish to ask whether additional funds will be requested for the temporary shelter.
The Council may wish to ask whether there have been any conversations about the County providing funding for
the Salt Lake City side operations.
The Council may wish to ask about the other support costs related to shelter-resistant camping locations in the
City, and whether adequate budget remains for the waste disposal and temporary restroom facilities.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Fisher Carriage House Redevelopment Renderings
2. Chief Innovation Officer Job Description
3. Administration's Memo about Request for Hiring Police Officers in Budget Amendment #6
4. ESG Funding log
ACRONYMS
CAFR – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
CARES Act – Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
CLT – Community Land Trust
COPS - Community Oriented Policing Services
DAQ – Utah Division of Air Quality
ERP – Enterprise Resource Planning
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency
FTE – Full time employee
FY – Fiscal Year
HUD – United States Housing and Urban Development Department
IMS – Department of Information Management Services
LWCF - Land and Water Conservation Fund site
RFI – Request for Information
SLCDA – Salt Lake City Department of Airports
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
SITE PLAN
W 200 S
FUTURE
BOAT
ACCESS
FOLSOM TRAIL
JORDAN RIVER TRAIL
PADDLE
SHARE
LOCKERS
CARRIAGE HOUSE
FISHER
MANSIONJORDAN RIVERLOCATION MAP
N
PROPOSED
BOAT ACCESS
BOAT ACCESS
BOAT ACCESS
JORDAN
RIVER
TRAIL
FOLSOM TRAIL
NORTH TEMPLE
W 200 N
I - 15
I - 80
W 200 S N 800 WS 900 WN 900 WS 1000 WEMERY STS CHEYENNE STREDWOOD RDNAVAJO STCALIFORNIA AVE
INDIANA AVE
W 300 S
W 400 S
W 700 S
POPLAR GROVE BLVD
W 1700 S S 700 WJOR
D
A
N
R
I
V
E
R
PROJECT SITE
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
MAIN LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN
N
OPEN
OFFICE
MEETING
AREA
RESTROOMS
WORK ROOM /
FLEX SPACE
UTILITY
CLOSET
OFFICE OFFICE
EXHIBIT SPACE /
FLEX SPACE
EXHIBIT
FOYER
OFFICE
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
SECTION LOOKING WEST SECTION LOOKING NORTH
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTHWEST
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTHEAST
Fisher Mansion Carriage House Improvements
JORDAN RIVER TRAILSIDE EXPLORATION CENTER
PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTH
Salt Lake City Corporation, Human Resources Department
Job Title: Chief Innovation Officer
Job Code Number: xxxxxx FLSA: Exempt
Pay Level: 039 EEO Code: 1
Bargaining Unit: 000 Benchmark: Executive / Administrative
JOB SUMMARY:
Working under the general direction of the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), incumbent is responsible
for managing the innovation process within the City and providing the necessary ecosystem that allows
ideas to germinate, take root and flourish. Works closely as a management consultant to departments
to develop and inspire the creation and implementation of data-driven best practices in municipal
government and foster a culture of innovation, efficiency, and process improvement. Focuses on
identifying and scaling creative ideas that work throughout the City’s business, operational, and
administrative functions. Implements solutions in partnership with internal and external
stakeholders. Acts as a strategic and forward-thinking catalyst for change throughout City Hall and
identifies opportunities to improve, adapt, and implement creative, data-driven, comprehensive
solutions to traditional, technological, and operational problems. Drives the organization towards
innovative solutions. Assists with and coordinates the implementation of citywide administrative and
policy initiatives. May direct and/or supervise staff and program functionality in the Mayor’s office.
This is an appointed, at-will position without tenure and exempt from the career service system.
TYPICAL DUTIES:
1. Formulates and implements effective new ideas and innovative strategies and incorporate them into
the City’s plans.
2. Researches and analyzes trends in local government to forecast future changes in practices,
processes, and programs; explore and import innovations from other communities for testing where
they may be applicable.
3. Utilizes quantitative and research methods to identify opportunities for improvement in operations and
services throughout the city. Analyzes and researches a variety of administrative and operational
issues/problems/opportunities and provide sound solutions or courses of action; establishes and
maintains systems for measuring, monitoring and reporting on operational and management
performance citywide.
4. Formulates solutions and provides implementation alternatives to various governmental systems,
processes, and service delivery models and delivers recommendations to the mayor, city council,
departments, and outside agencies.
5. Evaluates the progress of innovation and adjust the pace or direction of new projects in accordance
with the city’s various strategic priorities.
Chief Innovation Officer - Cont.
6. Provides citywide oversight of metrics and data analytics to facilitate strategic utilization of data.
7. Forges partnerships with local community groups, companies, universities and school systems that
can support the research and development of innovative solutions.
8. Works in partnership with the Chief Information Officer on identification, development, and testing of
civic technologies and projects that advance the city’s Open Government mission; ensures a forward-
thinking, cohesive, and strategic approach to technology in support of all municipal business units.
9. Represents the city and serves as liaison and convener with other local, state and federal agencies
and related NGOs to align community innovation with broader regional and national programs.
10. Leads multi-functional, cross-departmental teams that may consist of employees from all levels of the
organization.
11. Develops and equips managers in their role as change agents and leaders of innovation in their
respective departments.
12. Performs highly responsible and complex administrative work related to planning and managing the
activities of assigned departments and units; develops short- and long-range plans, goals, and
objectives with clear objectives, outcomes, and performance measures.
13. Advises city leaders on the effective, efficient, and economical management of the areas of
assignment; submitting reports; monitoring grant opportunities (i.e., local, state, federal, private) to
add innovative capacity to city operations.
14. Performs other duties as assigned.
KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL REQUIREMENTS:
Demonstrated knowledge of:
• Complexity management, organizational alignment and change management, supported
by complex technology operations.
• Fiscal management, including budget preparation, expenditure control, and record
keeping.
• Management and supervisory principles and practices.
• Leadership theories and practices, work styles and teambuilding.
• Principles and practices of municipal administration, functions, services and organization.
• Advanced project management skills.
• Organizational development principles and practices.
• Innovation and continuous improvement principles and practices.
• Management and supervisory principles, practices and methods.
Demonstrated skill in:
• Interacting with a variety of agencies and departments, community groups, elected
officials, and advocates.
• Developing program goals and objectives.
• Developing program goals and objectives and directing, conducting and implementing
planning activities.
• Identifying new ideas, potential opportunities and ways of working by leveraging
technologies; ability to frame problems and perspectives
• Analyzing and evaluating program operations and develop and implement corrective
action to resolve problems.
• Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with department
management, employees, city council members, other agencies, and the general public.
• Representing the city to external contacts and customers at the highest professional
level.
• Communicating effectively, both orally and in writing, with individuals and groups
regarding complex or sensitive issues or regulations.
• Facilitating group decision making and resolve complex problems at a high level of
complexity.
• Building and maintaining strong internal and external relationships
• Influencing others toward process improvement, developing effective means to challenge
assumptions and "usual" ways of doing things.
• Presenting complex concepts and issues to a wide variety of audiences in an effective
and understandable manner.
• Communicating effectively both orally and in writing, regarding complex technical issues.
• Assembling, organizing and presenting complex statistical and factual data derived from
a variety of sources.
• Analyzing and interpreting complex data and information; direct others involved with
analysis.
• Remaining current with technical developments in the field.
WORKING CONDITIONS:
• Light physical effort. Intermittent sitting, standing and walking. Comfortable working
conditions.
• Considerable exposure to stress resulting from complex problem solving, stringent
project deadlines, and liaison work between City departments, Mayor’s Office,
politically powerful community groups, and the City Council.
A TEN YEAR PERSONAL, CRIMINAL AND EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND CHECK IS REQUIRED
FOR THIS POSITION.
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed
by persons assigned to this job. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all duties,
responsibilities and skills required of personnel so classified.
All requirements are subject to possible modification to reasonably accommodate individuals
with disabilities.
Position Review Information
Date: 3-31-2020
Departmental Approval: Lisa Shaffer, Deputy Chief of Staff
HR Consultant Approval:
Compensation Approval: David Salazar
Notes: New job/position
Request to hire Police Officer positions
vacated through resignations, separations and
retirements
The Police Department is requesting to hire Police Officers to
replace vacancies created through resignations, separations
and retirements.
While the Police Department understands the City Council’s resolve to increase civilian positions in
community programs such as social work and relieve some of the need for police officers in the
community, those positions and programs are not fully developed. The need to maintain police officer
staffing to adequately respond to community needs, calls for service and emergency response is still
paramount for the police department and the City.
The community deserves excellence, not adequate service and we are not even at adequate.
The Police Department is experiencing low staffing levels which creates difficulties in providing timely
response to calls for service and other community needs. These low staffing levels have created an ever
growing concern that, in the event of an emergency, the police department does not have the necessary
staffing to respond to basic community safety needs or provide the level of service required to maintain
safety in the city. With these low staffing levels there is very little opportunity for patrol to provide
proactive policing.
Contributing issues to the understaffing of police
officers
Resignations, Separations and retirements
The Police Department is experiencing an unprecedented number of resignations, separations
and retirements. From July 1, 2020 to December 20, 2020.
S wo rn c ou nt by FY
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Grand To tal
1 July 2 1 7 9 11 30
2 August 2 3 5 1 4 15
3 September 2 2 1 4 10 19
4 Octo ber 4 4 6 1 17 32
5 No vember 3 2 5 2 4 16
6 December 3 4 6 2 7 22
7 Ja nua ry 2 8 1 3 1 15
8 February 4 4 4 2 14
9 Marc h 4 2 6 1 13
10 April 2 4 3 2 11
11 May 1 4 8 4 17
12 June 3 6 6 15
Gran d Total 29 41 58 37 54 219
THIS CHART IS CALENDAR YEAR – FOR COMPARISON to Fiscal Year above
THIS CHART IS CALENDAR YEAR – FOR COMPARISON to Fiscal Year above
The Police Department will have 53 vacant funded (including attrition positions) sworn and 20
vacant unfunded sworn positions with the announced retirements and resignations through
December 2020. There are also 3 pending vacancies for January.
Departmental Leaves
The number of Officers on leaves from the Police Department, including Short term disability, Workers
Compensation, FMLA, ERPL, Administrative Leave, Parental Leave and Military Leave has fluctuated from
45 leaves in July to a high of 70 leaves in October.
These numbers do not include accrued leave time available and taken to include Vacation, Personal
Leave, Compensatory Time, Holiday and Funeral Leave. Other factors that affect officer availability
include court time and training time.
Quarantines
The nature of police work lends itself to exposure risk of the COVID 19 virus.
The Police Department has worked diligently to reduce the risk from COVID by implementing training,
PPE requirements and contact tracing. Along with all other precautionary measures taken, quarantines
have been necessary to reduce spread of the virus within the department and the community.
COViD Quarantines
This chart represents persons placed into quarantine. Quarantines last between 4 and 14 days in most
cases. **The data in this chart are preliminary figures due to changing protocols throughout the time
of the data collection, some data may be missing and/or incomplete.
The chart above reflects the number of employees that entered quarantine per day. Quarantined
employees are assigned to work telephonic but are not available for patrol response.
The culmination of resignations, separations, retirements, leaves, quarantines and training creates a
huge gap in staffing. The Police Department is now staffing at a level that does not provide adequate call
response or timely case resolution for the community we serve.
Other issues affecting staffing
The city continues to see an increase year to year in calls for service
Calls for Service
Call time response has increased due to many factors including the increased number of calls for service
and the reduced number of officers available.
Protest and free speech events
The City continues to experience protest and free speech events on a regular basis. For the period of
March to November the city has had over 270 protests or free speech events. These events all require
research and analysis. When safety concerns are identified for any event staffing for safety and
investigation are also required. It also required deployment or standby of motors and public order units
to mitigate potential or experienced civil unrest.
Homeless Encampment cleanups
The Police Department has been integral in working with the Department of Health on all encampment
cleanups. This has put a strain on both on-duty and overtime resources.
COVID mitigation
Salt Lake County and DNR have funded overtime resources for COVID mitigation in parks and open areas
of city. Working these overtime shifts have also strained the ability to staff departmental overtime
patrol coverage shifts.
Use of on-duty resources
The Police Department continues to utilize on-duty resources for large events such as the Vice-
Presidential Debate, protests, free speech events and public safety response such as homeless
encampment cleanups and COVID 19 mitigation whenever possible. Use of on-duty resources is
necessary to reduce the budget impacts that would occur with the use of overtime as well as the
inability to fill overtime rosters with voluntary signup by officers.
Inability to fill overtime shifts
The police department is experiencing low rates of voluntary overtime shift signups including patrol
coverage signups. This is seemingly due to many factors including morale and the increased stress that
they are experiencing related to their positions.
All factors mentioned above are damaging to the ability of the police department to maintain an
adequate response but in totality they are detrimental to public safety, the city and the communities we
serve.
Budgetary Impacts of low staffing numbers
The police department is experiencing multiple impacts related to the inability to retain and maintain
adequate staffing.
Overtime
Call outs
Backfill
Officer mental health and wellness (workers compensation)
Retirements, separations, resignations
Cost of retirement, separation and resignation payouts
Retention vs replacement
Required attrition savings – the retirements that are providing these savings are also creating costs
related to retirement payouts and overtime.
Overtime needs and associated costs will continue to increase as the number of officers on staff
decrease. Overtime costs will not decrease at the time officer vacancies are filled but approximately one
year after the hiring process of a new officer begins. We currently have officers in the background
process that could be hired in February and placed into service in January of 2022.
Cyclical issues - Low staffing in an environment with increasing calls for service creates backlogs in calls
for service and longer response times. The mental stress from running from call to call and never
catching up creates additional stress. When officers are under additional stress that they cannot
mitigate we see additional mental health and physical illness. These stress related issues have multiple
costs which includes medical visits, workers compensation and leaves. When officers go out on leave, it
again lowers staffing which increases the workload and stress on the other officers.
Police Department efforts to
improve community response
times
The police department has been proactive in efforts to mitigate the staffing issues presented above, but
these efforts are not sustainable long term.
Redeployment of resources
The police department recently made a temporary reallocation of resources from investigative and
special response areas of the department to patrol. This temporary redeployment will help manage calls
for service in the short term but puts extreme limitations on the resources available to investigate
crime, respond and investigate increasing gang related violence and criminal activity, it reduces school
resource officer availability as schools return to on-site learning, reduces focused enforcement of drive
by shootings, narcotics, auto theft, property crimes, reduces motor deployment availability and creates
issues related to delays in solving criminal cases and taking the criminal element off the street in a
timely manner. Bike squads are not currently affected, but daily needs to cover calls for service may
require us to reallocate bike squad resources on a daily basis.
Use of available overtime funding
The police department has been utilizing available funding for overtime related to COVID from outside
agencies such as Salt Lake County and the Division of Natural Resources. This funding has been
temporary in nature and most of it has ended. Grant funding for overtime has been utilized when it is
applicable to the grant objectives.
Ongoing evaluation of community needs and the most
effective ways to meet those needs
Preparing to meet the long term needs of the
community
Hiring
The police department has been working towards a hiring class to fill vacant officer positions. A hiring
class can be implemented as early as February of 2021. Officers from this class will not be available to
handle calls for service for 10 months which would put them in service in January of 2022. This is an
extremely long time to improve staffing and calls for service response. In order to proceed with this
hiring class in February of 2021, the police department would need approval to hire no later than
January 12, 2021 to meet post requirements for an academy.
It is paramount to maintain a consistent hiring process in order to mitigate large swings in staffing.
Redeploying resources on a regular basis incurs costs in multiple areas. Consistent small academy
classes are more manageable in budget and curriculum scheduling then fluctuating hiring processes.
Training
The police department also supports the administration, city council and the community to provide
increasing training within the department. Training would need to be dynamic to meet the needs of the
community and to provide training in a timely manner additional time availability for officers or
overtime would be needed to accomplish additional training.
1 Utah Community Action New REQUEST:1,212,940$
Homeless Prevention CDCIP:1,212,940$
MAYOR:1,212,940$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 108.42
REQUEST:1,212,940$
CDCIP:1,212,940$
MAYOR:1,212,940$
COUNCIL:-$
2 Utah Community Action New REQUEST:773,355$
Rapid Rehousing CDCIP:773,355$
MAYOR:773,355$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 110.81
3 The Road Home New REQUEST:50,000$
Prevention Assistance CDCIP:50,000$
MAYOR:150,000$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 105.89
REQUEST:823,355$
CDCIP:823,355$
MAYOR:923,355$
COUNCIL:-$
SALT LAKE CITY ESG-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2020-2021
Support for households who have recently exited Rapid
Re-Housing Program and are in need of an immediate intervention to
retain their housing stability.
ESG-CV RAPID REHOUSING TOTAL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY % OF GRANT AWARD
$3,986,9112020-2021 Funding Available:
Emergency rental assistance for clients experiencing a COVID related
crisis, and funding for case managers to provide case management
services to clients.
ESG-CV HOMELESS PREVENTION TOTAL
Emergency rental assistance for clients experiencing a Covid related
crisis, and funding for case managers to provide case management
services to clients to ensure they are able to become self-reliant.
ESG-CV RAPID REHOUSING
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
ESG-CV HOMELESS PREVENTION
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY % OF GRANT AWARD
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
ESG-CV Page 1
4 Volunteers of America New REQUEST:128,917$
Homeless Outreach Program CDCIP:128,917$
MAYOR:128,917$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 106.70
5 Soap to Hope New REQUEST:112,180$
Street Outreach Program CDCIP:112,180$
MAYOR:112,180$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 71
REQUEST:241,097$
CDCIP:241,097$
MAYOR:241,097$
COUNCIL:-$
6 Friends of Switchpoint New REQUEST:750,000$
Salt Lake Winter Overflow Shelter CDCIP:750,000$
MAYOR:750,000$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 96.7
7 The Inn Between New REQUEST:114,400$
Medical Respite CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:-$
CDCIP did not score this application due to it's HUD-CV ineligibility.
REQUEST:864,400$
CDCIP:750,000$
MAYOR:750,000$
COUNCIL:-$
Reach the increased number of unsheltered individuals experiencing
homelessness due to COVID-19. Funding will support new positions,
and to provide basic needs items.
Essential care and supplies for homeless persons living on the street,
including substance abuse services. Staffing costs to increase outreach.
ESG-CV STREET OUTREACH TOTAL
Staff costs for a medical housing, to medically frail and terminally ill
homeless individuals, who need to be in a COVID-free environment due
to underlying health conditions and other high-risk factors.
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
Application is HUD-CV ineligible. Application does not meet the HUD-CV definition of
Emergency Temporary Shelter.
ESG-CV STREET OUTREACH
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY % OF GRANT AWARD
Funds will be used for staffing two 24/7 facilities that will operate as
winter overflows. Shelter rental costs, staffing, food and
PPE supplies will be included in the use of funds.
ESG-CV EMERGENCY SHELTER TOTAL
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
ESG-CV EMERGENCY SHELTER
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY % OF GRANT AWARD
Emergency Shelter Housing
ESG-CV Page 2
8 Salt Lake City Corporation New REQUEST:398,691$
Administration of Grant Programs * CDCIP:398,691$
MAYOR:398,691$
COUNCIL:-$
Maximum Score 129
Applicant Score: 103.9
REQUEST:398,691$
CDCIP:398,691$
MAYOR:398,691$
COUNCIL:-$
FUNDS REQUESTED FUNDS AVAILABLE
Homeless Prevention 1,212,940$ 3,986,911$
Rapid Rehousing 823,355$ 3,986,911$
Street Outreach 241,097$
Emergency Shelter 864,400$ FUNDS RECOMMENDED
Administration 398,691$ CDCIP:3,426,083$
TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED:3,540,483$ MAYOR:3,526,083$
COUNCIL:-$
CDCIP Board Recommendation:
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION
CDCIP:-$
MAYOR:460,828$
COUNCIL:3,986,911$
Administration Staff Analysis:
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY
% OF GRANT AWARD
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:
TOTALS
Board Motion For Remaining ESG and CDBG Funding: To go to homeless service agencies that could help with
COVID-19 vaccination, such as agencies that can help identify low income, homeless, marginalized populations, and
communities of color, to obtain and receive the COVID-19 vaccine.
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and
Respond to COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
Grant administration for ESG-CV Funding.
* $314,748 Has been appropriated by City Council to cover
administration costs for 2020-2021. Balance will be utilized for the
remainder of the grant period.
ESG-CV ADMIN
GRANT AWARD:
(NOTE: 10% is the maximum ESG-CV amount) ESG-CV ADMIN TOTAL
ESG-CV Page 3
2020-2021 Funding Available: $87,443
1 Utah Community Action REQUEST:82,196$
Housing Stability HTFAB:82,196$
MAYOR:82,196$
COUNCIL:-$
Max Score: 129
Applicant Score 119.83Applicant Score 119.83
REQUEST:82,196$
HTFAB:82,196$
MAYOR:82,196$
COUNCIL:-$
2 Salt Lake City Corporation REQUEST:5,247$
Administration of Grant Program*HTFAB:5,247$
MAYOR:5,247$
COUNCIL:-$
Max Score: 129
Applicant Score: 109.17
REQUEST:5,247$
HTFAB 5,247$
MAYOR:5,247$
COUNCIL:-$
FUNDS REQUESTED FUNDS AVAILABLE
Housing Stability $ 82,196 87,443$
Administration 5,247$ 87,443$
TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED 87,443$
FUNDS RECOMMENDED
HTF Board Recommendation:HTFAB:87,443$
MAYOR:87,443$
COUNCIL:-$
AVAILABLE FOR ALLOCATION
Administration Staff Analysis:HTFAB:-$
MAYOR:-$
COUNCIL:87,443$
HOPWA-CV ADMIN
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME
This funding will be utilized to provide Permanent Housing Placement
(PHP) and Short-term Rent, Mortgage and Utility (STRMU) assistance for
persons with HIV/AIDS, during the COVID-19 Crisis
Grant administration for HOPWA-CV funding.
* $314,748 Has been appropriated by City Council to cover administration
costs for 2020-2021. Balance will be utilized for the remainder of the grant
period.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY % OF GRANT AWARD
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and Respond to
COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
SALT LAKE CITY HOPWA-CV PROGRAM: FUNDING LOG 2020-2021
APPLICANT/ PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN and COVID-19 ELIGIBILITY
HOPWA-CV HOUSING STABILITY TOTAL
HOPWA-CV HOUSING STABILITY
PREVIOUS GRANT
AWARDS
REQUEST/RECOMMENDED
% OF GRANT AWARD
TOTALS
Aligns with Consolidated Plan and meets eligibility through the Prepare, Prevent, and Respond to
COVID-19 requirement of the CARES ACT.
GRANT AWARD:
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE:
(NOTE: 6% is the HOPWA-CV admin amount.) HOPWA-CV ADMIN TOTAL
HOPWA-CV Page 1
MARY BETH THOMPSON
Chief Financial Officer
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
POLICY AND BUDGET DIVISION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 238
PO BOX 145467, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5455 TEL 801-535-6394
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
___________________________________ Date Received: ________________
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: ___________
______________________________________________________________________________
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 16, 2020
Chris Wharton, Chair
FROM: Mary Beth Thompson, Chief Financial Officer
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment #6
SPONSOR: NA
STAFF CONTACT: John Vuyk, Budget Director (801) 535-6394 or
Mary Beth Thompson (801) 535-6403
DOCUMENT TYPE: Budget Amendment Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that, subsequent to a public hearing,
the City Council adopt the following amendments to the FY 2020 – 21 adopted budget.
BUDGET IMPACT:
REVENUE EXPENSE
GENERAL FUND $ 0.00 $ 63,673.00
IMS FUND 453,399.00 453,399.00
AIRPORT FUND 300,000,000.00 0.00
CIP (IMPACT FEE) FUND 0.00 1,293,732.00
TOTAL $ 300,453,399.00 $ 1,810,804.00
Lisa Shaffer (Dec 16, 2020 14:21 MST)
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Revenue for FY 2019-20 Budget Adjustments
The Fiscal Year 2021 projections are coming in below budgeted revenues. The following chart
shows a current projection of General Fund Revenue for fiscal year 2021.
Business licensing is seeing a decrease from budget due to trends for apartment units, new
business license and business license renewals. Due to the administrative order for COVID
parking ticket revenue shows a decrease of nearly $500k due to only 51,000 pay station
transactions through the end of August (normally well over 200k). This decrease is also having
an effect on citations written. Additionally, Justice Court fines are down $37k, while moving
violations are down $151k. In Charges and Services, field reservation fees are down $273k while
auto parking fees are also under budget. Miscellaneous revenues are also down due to a decrease
in special events and the elimination of take-home vehicle fees during the current pandemic.
FY20-21 Variance
Annual Revised Favorable
Revenue Budget Forecast (Unfavorable)
Property Taxes 111,418,455 111,418,455 -
Sales and Use Tax 67,999,593 67,999,593 -
Franchise Tax 26,812,125 26,812,125 -
PILOT Taxes 1,508,894 1,508,894 -
TOTAL TAXES 207,739,067 207,739,067 -
License and Permits 28,601,482 28,225,928 (375,554)
Intergovernmental 4,444,400 4,444,400 -
Interest Income 1,900,682 1,900,682 -
Fines & Forfeiture 3,938,848 3,202,960 (735,888)
Parking Meter Collection 3,347,986 2,848,523 (499,463)
Charges and Services 4,428,069 4,083,647 (344,422)
Miscellaneous Revenue 4,014,037 3,435,330 (578,707)
Interfund Reimbursement 20,281,706 20,281,706 -
Transfers 9,750,600 9,750,600 -
TOTAL W/OUT SPECIAL TAX 288,446,877 285,912,843 (2,534,034)
Sales and Use Tax - 1/2 cent 32,797,506 32,797,506 -
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 321,244,383 318,710,349 (2,534,034)
Given the available information fund balance would be projected as follows:
This projection of fund balance includes a line item adding in funding budgeted for use for
expenses associated with COVID-19 in fiscal year 2020 that were not spent.
2019 Actual FOF GF Only TOTAL FOF GF Only TOTAL
Beginning Fund Balance 56,104,269 10,372,054 69,441,955 79,814,009 6,625,050 36,900,813 43,525,863
Budgeted Use of Fund Balance (380,025) - (1,510,094) (1,510,094) - (4,885,620) (4,885,620)
Prior Year Encumbrances (8,731,774) (3,105,004) (6,566,830) (9,671,834) - - -
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 46,992,470 7,267,050 61,365,031 68,632,081 6,625,050 32,015,193 38,640,243
Beginning Fund Balance Percent 14.57%18.52%21.06%20.76%20.20%11.38%12.30%
Year End CAFR Adjustments
Revenue Changes - - - - - - -
Expense Changes (Prepaids, Receivable, Etc.) (3,701,982) - (4,127,838) (4,127,838) - - -
Fund Balance w/ CAFR Changes 43,290,488 7,267,050 57,237,193 64,504,243 6,625,050 25,390,143 38,640,243
Final Fund Balance Percent 13.42%18.52%19.65%19.51%20.20%9.03%12.30%
Budget Amendment Use of Fund Balance (1,858,647)
BA#1 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#1 Expense Adjustment - (410,173) (410,173) - - -
BA#2 Revenue Adjustment - 135,628 135,628 - - -
BA#2 Expense Adjustment - (745,025) (745,025) - (288,488) (288,488)
BA#3 Revenue Adjustment - - - - - -
BA#3 Expense Adjustment - (50,000) (50,000) - (6,239,940) (6,239,940)
BA#4 Expense Adjustment (2,300,000) (10,987,506) (13,287,506) - - -
BA#5 Revenue Adjustment - - - - (242,788) (242,788)
BA#5 Expense Adjustment - (1,350,000) (1,350,000) - (2,783,685) (2,783,685)
BA#6 Revenue Adjustment - 438,980 438,980 - - -
BA#6 Expense Adjustment - (3,071,042) (3,071,042) - (63,673) (63,673)
FOF Revenues 3,149,980 - - - - - -
Projected Revenue Shortfall 758,000 (4,297,242) (3,539,242) - (2,534,035) (2,534,035)
Fund Balance Budgeted Increase 2,500,000 900,000 - 900,000 - - -
Unspent COVID Funds - - - - 5,900,000 5,900,000
HAND Rent Assistance Reimbursement - 1,100,000 1,100,000
- Adjusted Fund Balance 47,081,821 6,625,050 36,900,813 43,525,863 6,625,050 20,237,534 33,487,634
Adjusted Fund Balance Percent 14.60%16.88%12.67%13.17%20.20%7.19%10.66%
Projected Revenue 322,562,293 39,242,000 291,317,665 330,559,665 32,797,506 281,282,923 314,080,429
2021 Projection2020 Projection
Salt Lake City
General Fund
TOTAL
Fund Balance Projections
The Administration is requesting a budget amendment totaling $300,453,399 of revenue and
expense of $1,810,804.00. The amendment proposes changes in the four funds, including the
General Fund, the IMS Fund, the Airport Fund and the CIP Impact Fee Fund, with $63,673 from
the General Fund fund balance. The proposal includes six initiatives for Council review. Each of
the initiatives are time sensitive.
The proposal does include the transfer of six employees from the General Fund to the IMS fund
and the creation of one additional position within the IMS Fund.
A summary spreadsheet document, outlining proposed budget changes is attached. The
Administration requests this document be modified based on the decisions of the Council.
The budget opening is separated in eight different categories:
A. New Budget Items
B. Grants for Existing Staff Resources
C. Grants for New Staff Resources
D. Housekeeping Items
E. Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
F. Donations
G. Council Consent Agenda Grant Awards
I. Council Added Items
PUBLIC PROCESS: Public Hearing
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. ______ of 2020
(Sixth amendment to the Final Budget of Salt Lake City, including
the employment staffing document, for Fiscal Year 2020-2021)
An Ordinance Amending Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 27 of 2020 which adopted the
Final Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2020 and Ending
June 30, 2021.
In June of 2020, the Salt Lake City Council adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City,
Utah, including the employment staffing document, effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2020 and ending June 30, 2021, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-118 of the
Utah Code.
The City’s Budget Director, acting as the City’s Budget Officer, prepared and filed with
the City Recorder proposed amendments to said duly adopted budget, including the amendments
to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes specifically
stated herein, copies of which are attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
All conditions precedent to amend said budget, including the employment staffing
document as provided above, have been accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the final budget of
Salt Lake City, including the employment staffing document, as approved, ratified and finalized
by Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 27 of 2020.
SECTION 2. Adoption of Amendments. The budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document necessary to effectuate the staffing changes
2
specifically stated herein, attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance shall be, and the
same hereby are adopted and incorporated into the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, including the
amendments to the employment staffing document described above, for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10-6-128
of the Utah Code.
SECTION 3. Filing of copies of the Budget Amendments. The said Budget Officer is
authorized and directed to certify and file a copy of said budget amendments, including
amendments to the employment staffing document, in the office of said Budget Officer and in
the office of the City Recorder which amendments shall be available for public inspection.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this _____ day of __________, 2020.
________________________
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on __________________
Mayor’s Action: ____ Approved ____ Vetoed
_________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. _________ of 2020.
Published: ___________________.
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
Approved As To Form
_________________________
Jaysen Oldroyd
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
1 Fisher Carriage House Exploration Center
Construction CIP - 793,732.00 One-time -
2 Glendale Waterpark Redevelopment Plan CIP - 225,000.00 One-time -
3 Trailhead Property Acquisition CIP - 275,000.00 One-time -
4 City Innovations Team - Non Departmental GF - 453,399.00 On-going -
4 City Innovations Team - CAN GF - (166,764.00)On-going (4.00)
4 City Innovations Team - Public Services GF - (222,962.00)On-going (2.00)
4 City Innovations Team IMS 453,399.00 453,399.00 On-going 7.00
5 Police Department Hiring Class GF - - On-going -
1 Airport Interim Financing Airport 300,000,000.00 - One-time -
-
Total of Budget Amendment Items 300,453,399.00 1,810,804.00 - - 1.00
Total by Fund Class, Budget Amendment #1:
General Fund GF - 63,673.00 - - (6.00)
IMS Fund IMS 453,399.00 453,399.00 - - 7.00
Airport Fund Airport 300,000,000.00 - - - -
Capital Improvement Program Fund CIP - 1,293,732.00 - - -
Total of Budget Amendment Items 300,453,399.00 1,810,804.00 - - 1.00
- -
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #6
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Section I: Council Added Items
Section A: New Items
Section D: Housekeeping
Section F: Donations
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Section G: Council Consent Agenda -- Grant Awards
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
1
Initiative Number/Name Fund Revenue Amount Expenditure
Amount Revenue Amount Expenditure
Amount
Ongoing or One-
time FTEs
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Budget Amendment #6
Council ApprovedAdministration Proposed
Current Year Budget Summary, provided for information only
FY 2020-21 Budget, Including Budget Amendments
FY 2020-21 Adopted
Budget BA #1 Total BA #2 Total BA #3 Total BA #4 Total BA #5 Total BA #6 Total Total To-Date
General Fund (FC 10)326,130,003 288,487.58 6,184,940.00 2,783,685.00 63,673.00 335,450,789
Curb and Gutter (FC 20)3,000 3,000
DEA Task Force Fund (FC 41)1,763,746 1,763,746
Misc Special Service Districts (FC 46)1,550,000 1,550,000
Street Lighting Enterprise (FC 48)5,379,697 1,500.00 5,381,197
Water Fund (FC 51)126,333,193 296,750.00 126,629,943
Sewer Fund (FC 52)212,638,399 108,500.00 212,746,899
Storm Water Fund (FC 53)17,961,860 32,650.00 17,994,510
Airport Fund (FC 54,55,56)302,311,600 - 520,000.00 38,956,452.00 341,788,052
Refuse Fund (FC 57)16,515,438 53,200.00 2,742,500.00 19,311,138
Golf Fund (FC 59)8,484,897 8,484,897
E-911 Fund (FC 60)3,789,270 3,789,270
Fleet Fund (FC 61)19,209,271 93,000.00 19,302,271
IMS Fund (FC 65)18,289,687 237,000.00 453,399.00 18,980,086
County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for
Transportation (FC 69)7,571,945 7,571,945
CDBG Operating Fund (FC 71)3,509,164 3,063,849.00 6,573,013
Miscellaneous Grants (FC 72)8,261,044 716,764.00 5,925,738.42 5,925,738.00 7,818,505.00 28,647,789
Other Special Revenue (FC 73)- -
Donation Fund (FC 77)2,380,172 2,380,172
Housing Loans & Trust (FC 78)23,248,016 23,248,016
Debt Service Fund (FC 81)37,519,401 (3,858,955.00) 33,660,446
CIP Fund (FC 83, 84 & 86)24,420,242 36,435,000.00 1,293,732.00 62,148,974
Governmental Immunity (FC 85)2,855,203 2,855,203
Risk Fund (FC 87)51,409,025 14,350.00 51,423,375
Total of Budget Amendment Items 1,221,534,273 716,764.00 7,463,826.00 45,141,392.00 5,925,738.00 49,091,934.00 1,810,804.00 1,331,684,731
Budget Manager
Analyst, City Council
Contingent Appropriation
2
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
1
Section A: New Items
A-1: Fisher Carriage House Exploration Center Construction
Overage
CIP Impact
Fees
$793,732.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente/Lorna Vogt
The Carriage House Exploration Center project was initially funded through the CIP process, using Park Impact Fees, in
FY2019. The project scope includes construction of an exploration center at the historic Fisher Carriage House that
provides standing exhibits on the natural and cultural history of the Jordan River and surrounding area, and which
showcases a beautiful restored historical structure. The exploration center will provide space for activities and education
programs, places for visitors to engage with city staff and partners and get information about the Jordan River Parkway
Trail and water trail. The center will also provide a home-base for outreach & education staff with the SLC Trails & Natural
Lands Division, from which they can conduct programming up and down the Jordan River. Additionally, the project will
compliment an adjacent boat ramp (construction planned for winter 2020) and create a recreational jumping -off point for
the future Folsom Trail, the Jordan River Parkway Trail, and the Jordan River 'Paddle Trail.'
As design development nears completion, SLC Engineering and the consulting architect, CRSA, have updated budget
projections for the project. Unfortunately, those cost projections have increased significantly from the original b udget
estimate created in 2018 based on a preliminary conceptual design. This budget amendment requests the additional
funding necessary to implement the project, which (if funded) would go to bid in December 2020 and be constructed in
2021. Increased costs for the project are associated with all project elements, but particularly relate to the preservation of
historic windows and doors, interior finishes, necessary plumbing and electrical upgrades, unforeseen utility upgrades and
increased cost for proposed furnishings associated with the public exhibit space.
The Administration would also like to let the Council know about future costs associated with the project.
Future Ongoing Costs
Personnel
FT Site Manager and PT Assistant $ 90,000.00
Supplies and Materials $ 20,000.00
Kayak Rental Fleet (One-Time) $ 10,000.00
Facility Maintenance Costs $ 18,238.00
Grounds Maintenance Costs $ - *
TOTAL $ 138,238.00
* In Trails Natural Lands budget
A-2: Glendale Waterpark Redevelopment Plan CIP Impact
Fees
$225,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente/Lorna Vogt
Public Lands is requesting a budget amendment for $225,000 in Impact Fees to hire a consultant to create a Development
Plan for Glendale Water Park, a Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) site. A recent community survey found
slightly more than half of the 3700 respondents supported new uses on the site. The Development Plan would articulate a
long-term community supported vision for the site with phased implementation. The first phase, (to be determined with
the input of public feedback) would implement active recreation on site within the three-year LWCF requirement.
The 17-acre water park site located along the Jordan River is adjacent to two park sites, a golf course, the surplus canal and
natural areas along the Jordan river. This is an opportunit y to create a plan that unifies these public amenities through
connecting trails, unifying landscape character and the development of complementary recreation uses into a regional
asset. Developing the water park site within the context of the more than 210 acres of public lands would foster positive
activation and create a dynamic community asset. Because this site was private for so long, the development will
essentially create a new park, added to SLC's park inventory, with new service to residents and is impact fee eligible. In the
time of a pandemic and political divisions, it is more important than ever to invest in dynamic public spaces that connect
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
2
people and break down demographic and economic divides. The Glendale property is a unique opportunity to create a very
special place the supports economic development, public health, a sense of community, and environmental sustainability
as well as increase confidence in city government’s use of public funds.
Project Tasks may include but not limited to:
• Analyze the site and surrounding context: opportunities and constraints
• Facilitate community and stakeholder engagement: community support
• Define the Park Vision: Community vision and goals
• Develop conceptual site plan alternatives: Explore development alternatives and cost estimates.
Include analysis of alternative plan operations and maintenance requirements and cost estimates
• Develop Final Site Development Plan
• Develop an implementation plan that includes plan phasing and funding strategies
• Facilitate adoption by City Council.
A-3: Trailhead Property Acquisition CIP Impact
Fees
$275,000.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Dawn Valente/Lorna Vogt
The Administration is requesting $275,000 of Impact Fees to purchase land for a trailhead. The Administration can
provide additional details of the property in a closed session.
A-4: City Innovations Team GF $63,673.00
IMS $453,399.00
Department: Public Services Prepared By: Lisa Shaffer/John Vuyk
Salt Lake City Administration is looking to take transformational steps with regards to enterprise technologies and
improved business practices. To do this the development of a team is required, this team will be known as the City
Innovations Team. The team initially will be built upon existing resources from the Mayor’s Office, Public Services, IMS
and Community and Neighborhoods. This team will take on larger enterprise projects like the new Enterprise Resource
Planning (ERP) effort.
The team will also improve coordination and resources between the Civic Engagement Team and IMS Media Services. A
further step to improve engagement is to combine SLC Media Services and the Civic Engagement Team into a city -wide
communications/engagement team outside of the Mayor’s Office.
Currently, departments work with both teams separately to develop engagement and communications strategies for
projects. Both teams also co-manage SLCgov social media accounts. By combining the groups, the City can create a one
stop shop for engagement/communications efforts.
Positions:
From Public Services
Chief Innovations Officer – Nole Walkingshaw transfer FTE Deputy Director position
Strategy & Special Projects Manager – Alyssa Johnson transfer FTE Strategy & Special Projects Manager position
From Community and Neighborhoods
Civic Engagement Team – Four FTE’s transferred from Community and Neighborhoods
Elizabeth Buhler, Civic Engagement Manager
Kyle Strayer, Civic Engagement Program Specialist
Christianna Johnson, Civic Engagement Program Specialist
Ronnie Buttons, Special Projects Assistant
New Position
Strategy & Special Projects Manager
The proposal also includes operational costs associated with the team.
Salt Lake City FY 2020-21 Budget Amendment #6
Initiative Number/Name Fund Amount
3
A-5: Police Department Hiring Class GF $0.00
Department: Police Department Prepared By: Shellie Dietrich
The Administration and the Police Department are seeking Council support for the hiring of a police recruit class in
January or February of 2021. The Police Department is not seeking additional funding but will use current budget for fully
funded positions and attrition savings from the first six months of the year .
Section B: Grants for Existing Staff Resources
Section C: Grants for New Staff Resources
Section D: Housekeeping
D-1: Airport Interim Financing Airport $0.00
Department: Airport Prepared By: Brian Butler
Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA) plans to issue interim financing up to $300 million in the form of either
Commercial Paper backed by a Letter of Credit or a Line of Credit directly with a bank. We are currently in procur ement
and are negotiating the terms of the agreement which we deem to be favorable especially considering the low interest rate
environment. These funds will ultimately be refunded with long term debt, but we will maintain the facility for upwards of
three years to help with financial flexibility on the Airport Redevelopment Project. These funds can be used for operating
and maintenance expenses or to fund construction costs as determined by the Airport Finance division.
Section E: Grants Requiring No New Staff Resources
Section F: Donations
Section G: Consent Agenda
Section I: Council Added Items
Impact Fees ‐ Quick Summary Confidential
Data pulled 12/01/2020
Unallocated Budget Amounts: by Major Area
Area Cost Center UnAllocated
Cash Notes:
Impact fee - Police 8484001 318,626$ A
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 732,533$ B
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 6,404,154$ C
Impact fee - Streets 8484005 3,623,027$ D
11,078,339$
Expiring Amounts: by Major Area, by Month
202007 (Jul2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202008 (Aug2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202009 (Sep2020)2021Q1 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202010 (Oct2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202011 (Nov2020)2021Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202012 (Dec2020)2021Q2 9,155$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 9,155$ Current Month
202101 (Jan2021)2021Q3 669$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 669$
202102 (Feb2021)2021Q3 16,273$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,273$
202103 (Mar2021)2021Q3 16,105$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 16,105$
202104 (Apr2021)2021Q4 1,718$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 1,718$
202105 (May2021)2021Q4 14,542$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 14,542$
202106 (Jun2021)2021Q4 30,017$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 30,017$
202107 (Jul2021)2022Q1 10,107$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 10,107$
202108 (Aug2021)2022Q1 6,804$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 6,804$
202109 (Sep2021)2022Q1 5,554$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 5,554$
202110 (Oct2021)2022Q2 3,106$ ^ 1 -$ -$ -$ 3,106$
202111 (Nov2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
202112 (Dec2021)2022Q2 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Total, Currently Expiring through June 2021 88,481$ -$ -$ -$ 88,481$
Notes
^1 Fiscal Year 2021Fiscal
Quarter
E = A + B + C + D
Police Fire Parks Streets
Total
FY 2022Calendar
Month
12/01/20: We are currently in a refund situation. We will refund $88k in the next 11 months without offsetting expenditures
Impact Fees Confidential
Data pulled 12/01/2020 AAA BBB CCC DDD = AAA - BBB - CCC
Police
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Crime lab rent 8417001 -$ 118$ -$ (118)$
Impact fee - Police 8484001 -$ -$ -$ -$
Eastside Precint 8419201 21,639$ 21,639$ -$ -$
Sugarhouse Police Precinct 8417016 10,331$ 10,331$ -$ -$
Public Safety Building Replcmn 8405005 14,068$ 14,068$ -$ 0$
Police'sConsultant'sContract 8419205 5,520$ 5,462$ -$ 58$
Police impact fee refunds 8417006 510,828$ -$ -$ 510,828$
Police Refunds 8418013 539,687$ -$ 2,883$ 536,804$ A
PolicePrecinctLandAquisition 8419011 1,410,243$ 239,836$ -$ 1,170,407$
Grand Total 2,512,316$ 291,454$ 2,883$ 2,217,979$
Fire
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Fire refunds 8416007 82,831$ -$ -$ 82,831$
Fire Station #14 8415001 6,650$ 6,650$ -$ -$
Fire Station #14 8416006 52,040$ -$ -$ 52,040$
Fire Station #3 8415002 1,568$ -$ -$ 1,568$
Fire Station #3 8416009 1,050$ 96$ 485$ 469$
Impact fee - Fire 8484002 -$ -$ -$ -$
Study for Fire House #3 8413001 15,700$ -$ -$ 15,700$
FireTrainingCenter 8419012 46,550$ -$ 46,550$ -$ B
Fire'sConsultant'sContract 8419202 10,965$ 10,907$ -$ 58$
FY20 FireTrainingFac. 8420431 66,546$ 2,000$ 8,576$ 55,971$
Fire Station #3 Debt Service 8421200 541,106$ -$ -$ 541,106$
Fire Station #14 Debt Service 8421201 339,172$ -$ -$ 339,172$
Grand Total 1,164,177$ 19,653$ 55,610$ 1,088,913$
Parks
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
Impact fee - Parks 8484003 -$ -$ -$ -$
Three Creeks Confluence 8419101 173,017$ 159,062$ 13,955$ -$
Park'sConsultant'sContract 8419204 7,643$ 7,601$ -$ 42$
337 Community Garden, 337 S 40 8416002 277$ -$ -$ 277$
Folsom Trail/City Creek Daylig 8417010 766$ -$ 353$ 414$
Cwide Dog Lease Imp 8418002 24,056$ 23,000$ -$ 1,056$
Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence 8417018 11,856$ 50$ 10,237$ 1,570$
Rosewood Dog Park 8417013 16,087$ -$ 14,155$ 1,932$ C
Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn 8417017 2,946$ -$ -$ 2,946$
Fairmont Park Lighting Impr 8418004 50,356$ 43,597$ 605$ 6,155$
Parks and Public Lands Compreh 8417008 7,500$ -$ -$ 7,500$
Rich Prk Comm Garden 8420138 27,478$ 7,561$ 11,210$ 8,707$
Redwood Meadows Park Dev 8417014 15,939$ 760$ 4,851$ 10,329$
ImperialParkShadeAcct'g 8419103 10,830$ -$ -$ 10,830$
Park refunds 8416008 11,796$ -$ -$ 11,796$
9line park 8416005 86,322$ 38,566$ 34,689$ 13,067$
Warm Springs Off Leash 8420132 27,000$ -$ -$ 27,000$
JR Boat Ram 8420144 125,605$ 57,482$ 1,226$ 66,897$
IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks 8420406 350,000$ -$ 257,265$ 92,736$
Parks Impact Fees 8418015 102,256$ -$ -$ 102,256$
UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails 8420420 200,000$ 70,340$ 17,100$ 112,560$
9Line Orchard 8420136 195,045$ -$ -$ 195,045$
Cnty #2 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420426 515,245$ 319,862$ (7,517)$ 202,900$
Bridge to Backman 8418005 350,250$ 323$ 24,045$ 325,881$
Parley's Trail Design & Constr 8417012 327,678$ 979$ -$ 326,699$
Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen 8420424 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$
Jordan Prk Event Grounds 8420134 431,000$ -$ -$ 431,000$
Wasatch Hollow Improvements 8420142 490,830$ -$ -$ 490,830$
FY20 Bridge to Backman 8420430 727,000$ 63,456$ -$ 663,544$
Marmalade Park Block Phase II 8417011 1,145,394$ 64,287$ 15,756$ 1,065,351$
Fisher Carriage House 8420130 1,098,764$ -$ -$ 1,098,764$
Pioneer Park 8419150 3,442,199$ 94,100$ 14,400$ 3,333,699$
Grand Total 10,375,136$ 951,025$ 412,329$ 9,011,782$
Streets
Allocation
Budget Amended
Allocation
Encumbrances YTD Expenditures
Allocation
Remaining
Appropriation
Values
700 South Reconstruction 8414001 310,032$ -$ 310,032$ -$
700 South Reconstruction 8415004 1,157,506$ 258,285$ 899,221$ -$
IF Roundabout 2000 E Parleys 8420122 455,000$ -$ 455,000$ -$
Impact fee - Streets Westside 8484005 -$ -$ -$ -$
500 to 700 S 8418016 575,000$ 575,000$ -$ -$
LifeOnState Imp Fee 8419009 124,605$ 3,120$ 121,485$ -$
Transportation Safety Improvem 8417007 22,360$ 20,000$ 821$ 1,539$
Gladiola Street 8406001 16,544$ 13,953$ 347$ 2,244$ D
Street'sConsultant'sContract 8419203 39,176$ 17,442$ 9,360$ 12,374$
Trans Master Plan 8419006 13,000$ -$ -$ 13,000$
Transp Safety Improvements 8420110 250,000$ 211,917$ -$ 38,083$
500/700 S Street Reconstructio 8412001 41,027$ 118$ -$ 40,909$
1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr 8416004 42,833$ -$ -$ 42,833$
Complete Street Enhancements 8420120 125,000$ 60,848$ -$ 64,152$
Trans Safety Improvements 8419007 210,752$ 118,878$ 6,134$ 85,740$
Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design 8412002 124,593$ -$ -$ 124,593$
Transportation Safety Imp 8418007 147,912$ 2,162$ 7,506$ 138,244$
9 Line Central Ninth 8418011 152,500$ -$ -$ 152,500$
Bikeway Urban Trails 8418003 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$
TransportationSafetyImprov IF 8421500 375,000$ 72,947$ -$ 302,053$
IF Complete Street Enhancement 8421502 625,000$ -$ -$ 625,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8419008 251,316$ 9,969$ 5,719$ 235,628$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8420105 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$
Traffic Signal Upgrades 8421501 875,000$ -$ -$ 875,000$
Street Improve Reconstruc 20 8420125 2,858,090$ 452,870$ -$ 2,405,220$
Grand Total 9,292,247$ 1,817,510$ 1,815,625$ 5,659,112$
Total 23,343,877$ 3,079,643$ 2,286,446$ 17,977,787$
E = A + B + C + D
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
318,626$
$732,533
8484001
UnAllocated
Budget
Amount
6,404,154$
3,623,027$
11,078,339$
8484002
8484003
8484005
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL WWW.SLCCOUNCIL.COM
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304 TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
PO BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY UT 84114-5476 EMAIL: COUNCIL.COMMENTS@SLCGOV .COM
January 5, 2021
As Salt Lake City Council Chair, we hereby determine that conducting the Salt
Lake City Council meeting at an anchor location presents a substantial risk to the
health and safety of those who may be present at the anchor location. The World
Health Organization, the President of the United States, the Governor of Utah, the
Salt Lake County Health Department, Salt Lake County Mayor, and the Mayor of
Salt Lake City have all recognized a global pandemic exists related to the new strain
of the coronavirus, SARS- CoV-2.
Due to the state of emergency caused by the global pandemic, I find that
conducting a meeting at an anchor location under the current state of public health
emergency constitutes a substantial risk to the health and safety of those who may
be present at the location.
Sincerely,
Chris Wharton
Chair, Salt Lake City Council
Item F1
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Kira Luke
Policy Analyst
DATE:January 5, 2021
RE: MOTION SHEET: Resolution: Funding Our Future: Interlocal Agreement with Utah
Transit Authority Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 2 and Addendum No. 3
MOTION 1 – ADOPT
I move that the Council adopt the resolution entering into Amendment Number 1 to Addendum Number 2, and
Addendum Number 3 to the Interlocal Agreement with the Utah Transit Authority, and that the remaining
$979,545.19 be placed into a holding account reserved for future Funding Our Future transit expenses.
Staff note: this motion records the Council’s intention to hold a discussion about potential uses for the
remaining funding once Transportation’s formal recommendations are available. Staff will track this
in an upcoming budget opening to ensure that funds are legally allocated as intended.
MOTION 2 – NOT ADOPT
I move that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and proceed to the next agenda item.
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Kira Luke, Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analysts
DATE: December 8, 2020
RE: FUNDING OUR FUTURE Transit Update: Interlocal Agreement with Utah Transit Authority
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Funding Our Future: In 2018, the City implemented a 0.5% increase to the sales tax rate in Salt Lake
City. Following significant public engagement, the increase was approved to address unfunded critical
needs for projects and services, including improved transit service. To this end, the Council set four
priorities to improve transit:
Increasing coverage for under-served areas, particularly the West side but not excluding
other underserved areas of the City;
Increasing ridership, particularly in the City’s downtown core;
Building out infrastructure on Transit Master Plan routes;
The budget and timeline are based on 1000 North, 600 North, 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South. 400
South will be the last route implemented.
The Council prioritized 200 South, 900 South, and 2100 South for the first phase of transit improvements, with later
improvements planned for 600 North and 1000 North. i
NEW INFORMATION
There are outstanding questions about financing, true-ups and previously-encumbered funds which
were not addressed in the original transmittal. At the time of publishing, staff is waiting for
clarification on some of those issues and will update the report and Council Members once received.
The resolution included for the Council’s consideration would approve an amendment to the second addendum (2.1) to
the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) governing the City and Utah Transit Authority (UTA)’s collaboration. The second
addendum governed the first year of services from August 2019 to August 23, 2020, the latter half of which has been
impacted by COVID-19 since adoption.
The resolution also approves the third addendum to the Interlocal agreement, governing the next year of service from
August 2020 through the August change day of 2021.
Addendum 2, Amendment 1 (2.1)
The change to the second addendum addresses impacts on services from COVID-19. During the peak of the “Stay Safe,
Stay Home” phase, UTA sharply reduced services, including those governed by the ILA. The resolution takes this
reduction into account, along with decreased costs for fuel, and a slight increase in actual miles funded and amends the
addendum to reflect a net reduction of $511,472. The amendment proposes to credit this amount to the City for the
next service period governed by Addendum 3 (August 2020-August 2021).
Addendum 3 (3)
The third addendum currently under consideration authorizes funding for frequent transit network (FTN) service from
August 2020 to August 2021, including operator wages, benefits, service administration, vehicles and maintenance,
fuel, paratransit, and customer service for Routes 2, 9, and 21. As of August 23, 2020, UTA restored services system
wide to 91% of pre-pandemic levels, which includes frequent service on Routes 2, 9, and 21.
Page | 2
BUDGET IMPACT
There are outstanding questions about the financing, true-ups, and previously-encumbered funds which were not addressed in the original
transmittal. As of the posting of the agenda packets, staff is waiting for clarification on some of those issues and will update the report and
Council Members once received.
Fiscal Year 2020 (Addendum 2)Fiscal Year 2021 (Addendum 3)
Items Budgeted
Amendment
2.1 Budgeted Addendum 3
200 South, 900 South, 2100
South/2100 East FTN $5,307,845 $5,307,845 $ 4,700,000 $4,446,267.79
Fuel cost and gas true up -$107,404
Actual mileage difference $58,165
Pandemic reduction - $462,233
Service threshold adjustment*-$156,175.35
TOTAL
$ 5,307,845
$4,796,373
(-$511,472
proposed
credit)
$4,700,000
$4,290,092.44
(-$409,907.56 below
amount budgeted)
*Once service reaches a specific threshold in terms of riders served, UTA assumes sponsorship and funding of that
service, and City-funded sponsorship is no longer required. More information on this can be found on pages 56 and 70
of the Administrative Transmittal.
The $511,472 from 2.1 will be credited to the City for Addendum 3 service, pending the Council’s approval of the
amendment, but this does not appear to be reflected in Addendum 3. Staff is working with the City’s Finance
Department to confirm.
The Administration had three recommendations for the excess $409,907.56 budgeted for Addendum 3:
1. A transit-specific rainy day fund separate from Fund Balance to maintain service levels if future sales tax
revenues become insufficient
2.A renewed attempt for a Trips to Transit program focusing on Westside service. This funding level is likely
insufficient to fully fund the program.
3.Partial funding for 1000 North mobilization
In Budget Amendment #1 of FY2020 the Council placed $999,824 of remaining funding into a holding account which
was originally appropriated but ultimately not needed for frequent transit services under Addendum 2. Council Staff is
confirming the status of those funds with the Finance Department. The Council could consider adding these funds
(once confirmed) to any of the above initiative, or consider for other transit/transportation uses.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. Excess allocation: The Council may wish to discuss the Administration’s recommendation or other potential
uses for the available $409.907.56.
2.Contract timing: Due to delays in paperwork transmission, the Council allocated funding in the FY22 annual
budget but has not had the opportunity to review the addendum prior to the service implementation in August.
Staff understands that this may impact the City’s ability to deliver timely payments for current services. The
Council may wish to ask the Administration, are additional resources needed to enable Council
review prior to the next addendum’s effective date?
3.Additional routes: During the Fiscal Year 2020-21 discussions, the Council received an update that UTA
plans to sponsor (cover costs for) 600 North, and the City is planning on 1000 North mobilization next.
However, staff understands that there are significant delays or increased costs to implement those routes as
planned in addition to going uncertainty related to the pandemic. The Council may wish to request a
formal update detailing implementation of those two routes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (ILA)
Routes
Page | 3
The ILA categorizes the City’s service improvements as Frequent Transit Network
(FTN) routes and refers to the City’s Transit Master Plan (TMP) for the controlling
definition. The minimum service for routes serving 200 South, 900 South, and 2100
South is as outlined below. UTA may choose to provide additional service with no cost
to the City; any City-requested service expansions are subject to additional negotiation
and funding.
Figure 1 – Administrative
Transmittal, Page 5
The map on page 55 of the Administrative transmittal currently reflects a modified Route 9 from the original plans,
currently ending at 400 South instead of continuing to North Temple. This was due to multiple factors involving
pending plans for a Westside Transit Hub, the location of which is anticipated to affect multiple westside bus routes,
and changes at the eastern end of the line, where 2019 realignment to all routes on the University of Utah campus
resulted in changes to several routes, including Route 9.
Responsibilities in the Interlocal Agreement
City UTA
Provide funding to support route operation; appropriate funding and
notify UTA of available funding annually
Manage and operate routes, equipment,
personnel, insurance and accounting
May construct new bus stops, in compliance with UTA’s standards;
enhanced* maintenance to be negotiated prior to construction and
funded by the City
Produce/install branded bus stop signs
Send designee (City Transportation Director) to technical working group Send designee (UTA Planning Director)
to technical working group
Regularly exchange information to assess performance and report to the parties**
Share fuel costs via a semiannual “true-up”
*The Addendum template provides a section to define baseline (non-enhanced) services.
**Performance metrics could be added to the Funding Our Future website
The interlocal agreement between Salt Lake City and the Utah Transit Authority has two parts – a 20-year master
agreement, and specific addenda, which are negotiated each year. The master agreement is scheduled to end June 30,
2039. The master agreement is intended to form the framework of how transit improvements in the City’s Transit
Master Plan will be implemented.
Transit Master Plan Implementation
The agreement contemplates following the Frequent Transit Network as identified in the Transit Master Plan.
The Transit Master Plan used a formula based on transit industry standards to develop the Frequent Transit Network
recommendations. According to the plan, the formula can be used in the future to help determine when the plan’s
recommendations can be revised to reflect population or job growth within the City. Here is the formula:
o Operate light rail in areas where there are 12 to 24 or more households per acre and/or 16 to 32 or more jobs
per acre.
o Operate Bus Rapid Transit in areas where there are 10 to 15 households per acre and/or 12 to 20 jobs per acre.
o Operate buses every 15 minutes in areas where there are 10 to 12 households per acre and/or 12 to 16 jobs per
acre.
o Operate buses every 30 minutes in areas where there are 6 to 10 households per acre and/or 8 to 12 jobs per
acre.
o Operate buses every hour in areas where there are 3 to 6 households per acre and/or less than 4 jobs per acre.ii
According to the Administration, the thresholds are best practices based on current industry research and
should be used as guidelines rather than standards. Transit planning would take a variety of local conditions into
consideration about appropriate densities, as would UTA in establishing service levels. The guidelines also can be
helpful to communicate the relationship between density and successful transit.
Glossary
Frequent Transit Network – FTN
Page | 4
Fiscal Year - FY
Interlocal Agreement – ILA
Transit Master Plan - TMP
Utah Transit Authority - UTA
i Videotape, Council work session, Russell Weeks, October 9, 2018, 1:09.
ii Transit Master Plan, Page 6-4, 6-5. (Attachment 1)
8/31/2020
1
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
DEPARTMENT of COMMUNITY
and NEIGHBORHOODS
BLAKE THOMAS
Director
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404 WWW.SLC.GOV
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486 TEL 801.535.6230 FAX 801.535.6005
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council:
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE:
Chris Wharton, Chair
FROM: Blake Thomas, Director, Department of Community & Neighborhoods
SUBJECT: Amended Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with
Utah Transit Authority (UTA), Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 2 and Addendum No. 3 – FTN
Routes on 200 S, 900 S, and 2100 S
STAFF CONTACT: Julianne Sabula, Transit Program Manager, julianne.sabula@slcgov.com or
801-535-6678
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt a resolution (Exhibit 1) authorizing the
Mayor to enter into the proposed amendment to Addendum 2 (Exhibit 3), which would make
adjustments for cost savings on the basis of COVID-19 related bus service reductions and actual
fuel costs, as well as the proposed Addendum No. 3 (Exhibit 4) to the Interlocal Agreement with
UTA (Exhibit 2) to implement 2020-21 FTN service.
BUDGET IMPACT: The budget impacts are twofold. The first budget impact reflects three
adjustments to the cost of 2019-20 FTN service that yield an overall reduction of $569,637.63 in
the cost of FTN service provided during FY19-20. The first adjustment is an annual fuel “true-
up” based on the actual per gallon fuel cost and gas mileage as compared with UTA’s budgeted
fuel cost that informed the total budget of Addendum No. 2. This adjustment results in a credit
to the City of $107,404. The second adjustment is to the actual mileage of the FTN routes as
compared with what was anticipated and used to calculate the total budget of Addendum No. 2.
This adjustment results in a debit to the City of $58,165. The third adjustment is a reduction in
the cost for the FTN service provided during FY 19-20 in the amount of $462,233 for decreased
frequency due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This credit will be credited to the City in UTA’s
August and September invoices to the City for 2020-21 FTN service. The second budget impact
is for FY2020-21, and after adjusting to UTA’s new baseline, is expected to be $4,290,092.44,
subject to adjustment based on actual fuel costs and potential COVID-19 related discounts.
$4,700,000 was approved for this service by City Council in the FY2020-21 budget.
November 2, 2020
Lisa Shaffer (Nov 9, 2020 07:36 MST)
11/09/2020
11/09/2020
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The ILA is a twenty-year agreement that has a goal of full
implementation of the Frequent Transit Network as described in Salt Lake City’s Transit Master
Plan. Last year City Council approved Addendum No. 2, along with a corresponding budget
appropriation, to begin frequent transit service on the Routes 2, 9 and 21, which began operations
in August 2019. Addendum No. 3 extends that service from August 2020 to August 2021. A
discount may be applied if overall transit system levels are reduced in response to the impacts of
COVID-19, and that discount will be proportional to the percentage of service decrease, e.g., if
system-wide service is reduced 56% across all routes, including FTN routes, invoices to the City
will reflect a 56% discount.
Per the ILA, UTA has evaluated existing service on the 2, 9 and 21, and has determined that
weekday service on the 2 now meet UTA’s threshold for “productivity” (riders per service hour)
and “propensity” (surrounding population and land use characteristics support frequent service)
as defined in their April 2020 Service Design Guidelines (Exhibit 5). This reduces the overall
number of miles that the City will sponsor from 2019-20 levels of service on these routes during
2020-21. The reduced mileage costs based on meeting UTA thresholds is reflected in the cost
calculator included as an exhibit to Addendum 3.
This represents a savings of $156,175.35, and the refined cost for 2020-21 service is $409,907.56
below Council’s $4,700,000 appropriation. Potential uses for these funds recommended by staff
for Council consideration include the following, all of which support economic recovery for
residents who need it most.
• Contribution to a “rainy day” fund so that transit service levels can be maintained if sales
tax revenues are lower than projections,
• Partial funding for a “Trips to Transit” pilot focused on the City’s West Side,
• Partial funding for mobilization of transit service on the 1000 North Corridor.
It should be noted that Trips to Transit should either precede or be implemented concurrently
with service on 10th North because they are operationally connected, and further noted that UTA
plans to implement service on 600 North concurrently with both of these services.
Because COVID-19 related service reductions occurred during 2019-20, and because fuel costs
were lower than anticipated, UTA is also providing a discount to reflect those savings. UTA has
also adjusted 2019-20 mileage, which was slightly higher than was anticipated. Together these
adjustments yield a savings to the City of $569,637.63, and they are detailed in Exhibit 3, which,
if approved, will be reflected through reduced invoicing for 2020-21 FTN service.
In anticipation of implementing the Council’s next priority routes, and to support decision
making about whether this should occur in 2021 or 2022, staff is also including information
about mobilization and operation of the 1000 North route. Addendum No. 4 to the ILA (Exhibit
6) would supply mobilization funding to UTA to create the route, which would be followed by
Addendum No. 5 to fund service on that route (Exhibit 7) the following year for provision of the
service itself. If Council desires 2021 implementation of 1000 North, Addendum No. 4 and a
corresponding budget amendment would need to be approved by the end of this calendar year.
8/31/2020
2
During this first annual evaluation of true-ups, baseline service, and other factors described in the
ILA, staff had an eye to potential future refinements to the agreement. This was anticipated in the
initial negotiations, given the complexity of the agreement and relatively few precedents across
the country. A variety of issues arose that will be considered, and Council can anticipate
reconfirmation or recommended changes to the agreement’s methodologies. For example, we
will explore whether additional specificity is needed in how we calculate the annual escalator
(inflation) rate, how we evaluate baseline service, and how we transfer responsibilities when the
baseline thresholds are met.
Staff also learned that as both agencies work toward improving transit, we occasionally
encounter win-win situations, and these are worth mentioning as a natural outcome of working
together toward shared goals. Last year, UTA was able to provide seven-minute headways on the
Route 2 that had both operational and customer benefits. This year, UTA is extending the span of
service on Routes 2, 9, 21, 519, 520, and 6 as part of their Five-Year Service Plan update to
provide better shifts for their operators and extended access for customers, especially in the very
early morning hours. The value of this service is nearly $4.4 million without any increase in the
level of City sponsorship.
PUBLIC PROCESS: The public process included City-hosted public hearings on both the ILA
and Addendum No. 2, which initiated the service to be continued by Addendum No. 3, as well as
on the budget process that appropriated funding to increase service on those routes. This year’s
budget process, including public hearings, provided for additional public comment on the transit
service line item. In addition, UTA holds a public hearing process for each “change day”, of
which there are three per year for the purpose of making service changes. That process will occur
in advance of the August 2020 change day during which continuation of service levels would be
confirmed.
EXHIBITS:
1) Resolution
2)Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation
Interlocal Agreement
3) Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 2
a) Attachment A Service True-Up
b)Attachment B Fuel True-Up
4) Addendum No. 3
a)Attachment A1 FTN Definition
b) Attachment A2 FTN Corridors
c)Attachment B 2020-21 Baseline
d)Attachment C1 NTD Profile
e)Attachment C2 Cost per Mile
f)Attachment C3 Paratransit
g) Attachment C4 Funding for 2020-21 Transit Service Cost Calculator Worksheet
5) UTA Service Design Guidelines (April 2020)
8/31/2020
3
6) Draft Addendum 4 1000 North Mobilization (information only)
7) Draft Addendum 5 2021-22 Sponsored Service Funding Cost Calculator Worksheet
(information only)
8/31/2020
4
EXHIBIT 1 RESOLUTION
8/31/2020
5
8/31/2020
6
8/31/2020
7
EXHIBIT 2 Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement
8/31/2020
8
8/31/2020
9
8/31/2020
10
8/31/2020
11
8/31/2020
12
most recently reported in the NTD to determine an "Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate."
(d)The Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate includes administrative and overhead costs.
The Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate shall be discounted by twenty percent (20%) to reflect the
administrative and overhead expenses that would be incurred by UTA regardless of the
sponsored service. For the purposes of this Agreement, administrative and overhead expenses
for bus operational support are listed in the table attached as Exhibit "B." Because the Parties
are estimating the administrative and overhead expenses that are attributable to the City
sponsored service, the Parties agree to review the actual costs incurred by UTA every two
years, and adjust the administrative discount based on any actual increases or decreases directly
attributable to the City-sponsored service relative to the transit system as a whole. To facilitate
the Parties' review, UTA agrees to provide a breakdown of bus administration, bus operational
support, and administration for all modes agency-wide (and supporting information showing,
how the cost information is calculated into the reported NTD data) every year by September 30
of the year after the service is provided, in a reporting format substantially similar to the format
attached as Exhibit "D." UTA further agrees to cooperate with the City in the review and
provide further information in a timely manner if requested by the City.
(e)After application of the administrative and overhead discount set forth in Section
S(d), the Adjusted Per Mile BOE Rate shall be multiplied by the total sponsored revenue miles
to arrive at the "Service Mileage Cost, Without Fuel or Paratransit Costs."
(J)A charge for paratransit service shall then be added. The charge for paratransit
services shall be a sum equal to a fixed percentage of the Service Mileage Cost, Without Fuel
or Paratransit Costs. The percentage factor applied to determine the paratransit service charge
shall be determined by dividing the most recently reported NTD Annual Vehicle Revenue
Service Hours for Demand Response services by the most recently reported NTD Annual
Vehicle Revenue Service Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail transportation modes.
(g)The estimated fuel costs for the total sponsored revenue miles shall then be
added to determine the "Annual Service Mileage Cost."
(h)The methodology for calculating the Annual Service Mileage Cost is set forth in
Exhibit "C."
6.CITY OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO FTN ROUTES.
(a)The City shall contribute funding (the "City Funding") to UTA to support the
sal
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH 11/ANSJT A UTJJORITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN
IMP LEMENTA 110N AGREEMENT
Page 5 of 11
8/31/2020
13
8/31/2020
14
8/31/2020
15
8/31/2020
16
8/31/2020
17
8/31/2020
18
8/31/2020
19
8/31/2020
20
8/31/2020
21
8/31/2020
22
8/31/2020
23
8/31/2020
24
8/31/2020
25
8/31/2020
26
8/31/2020
27
8/31/2020
28
8/31/2020
29
8/31/2020
30
8/31/2020
31
8/31/2020
32
8/31/2020
33
8/31/2020
34
8/31/2020
35
8/31/2020
36
8/31/2020
37
8/31/2020
38
8/31/2020
39
8/31/2020
40
8/31/2020
41
8/31/2020
42
EXHIBIT 3 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO ADDENDUM NO. 2
Attachment A Service True-Up
Attachment B Fuel True-Up
8/31/2020
43
Amendment No. 1 to Addendum No. 2
To Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Interlocal Agreement
This Amendment No. 1 (Amendment) to that certain Addendum No. 2 to the Salt Lake City
Corporation and Utah Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal
Agreement (“ILA”) is made this ____ day of August 2020, by and between Utah Transit
Authority, a public transit district organized under the laws of the State of Utah (“UTA”) and
Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal corporation (“City”). UTA and City are hereinafter
collectively referred to as “Parties” and each may be referred to individually as “Party”.
Whereas on March 6, 2019 the Parties entered into an ILA for joint participation in
planning and funding transportation improvements in and around the City; and
Whereas on August 6, 2019 the Parties entered into an Addendum No. 2 to the ILA
which identified City-sponsored frequent transit network routes (“FTN Routes”) to be
provided by UTA for a period of one-year from the August 2019 change date until the
next succeeding August change day; and
Whereas Addendum No. 2 also provided, along with a description of FTN Routes, a
description of baseline services and charges associated with those FTN Routes; and
Whereas the COVID-19 Pandemic has caused as significant disruption of the services
required by the City and provided by UTA; and
Whereas the Parties desire to amend Addendum No. 2 to reflect those changes;
NOW THERFORE THE PARTIES AGREE TO AMEND ADDENDUM NO. 2 AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The description of FTN Routes set forth in Addendum 2 Attachment 1 are unchanged.
2. The frequency of the Baseline Services set forth in Addendum 2 Attachment 2 has
been decreased due to diminished demand occasioned by COVID-19. Frequency will
increased or decreased in UTA’s discretion according to demand.
3. The Funding for Transit Services described in Addendum 2 Attachment 3 shall be
subject to the forgoing:
a. The City shall be provided with an annualized service discount of $462,233
calculated as shown in this Amendment 1 Attachment A. The discount shall be
reflected in monthly invoices beginning with the June 2020 invoice. Any remaining
refund for overpayment owed to the City at the end of the service year (August 2020
change day) shall be carried over and reflected in billing discounts for the succeeding
service year.
8/31/2020
44
b. The City shall be provided with an annualized fuel charge refund of $107,404
calculated as shown in this Amendment 1 Attachment B. The discount shall be
reflected in monthly invoices beginning with the June 2020 invoice. Any remaining
refund for overpayment owed to the City at the end of the service year (August 2020
change day) shall be carried over and reflected in billing discounts for the succeeding
service year.
4. Any other provision of Addendum No. 2 not affected by paragraphs 2 or 3 above shall
remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Amendment as of the Effective
Date.
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY SALT LAKE CITY
CORPORATION
____________________________________
________________________________
By: By:
Title: Title:
___________________________________
_______________________________
By: AATF:
Title: Salt Lake Attorney’s Office
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office
____________________________________
________________________________
AATF: By:
UTA Legal Counsel City Recorder
8/31/2020
45
Addendum 2, Amendment 1
Attachment A
2019‐2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South
Service True‐Up
Addendum
2
Annual mileage
true‐up
COVID‐19
Reduction
Addendum 2,
Amendment
1
Cost per mile 7.62$ 7.62$ 7.62$
Annual escalator 2.2% 2.2% 2.2%
number years since NDT 2 2 2
Administrative Discount 20% 20% 20%
Miles 503,359 511,664 288,760
Total mileage cost 3,204,975$ 3,257,852$ 1,838,584$
Paratransit rate 10% 10% 10%
Total Paratransit Cost 320,497$ 325,785$ 183,858$
Number Vehicles 10 10 10
Lease Cost 41,088$ 41,088$ 41,088$
Total Vehicle cost 410,885$ 410,885 410,885
Total annual cost w/o fuel 3,936,357$ 3,994,521$ 2,433,327$
Total monthly cost w/o fuel 328,030$ 332,877$ 202,777$
8 months (August ‐ March 2,663,014.22$ 2,663,014$
4 months (April ‐ July) 811,109$ 811,109$
Total Cost to City without Fuel 3,474,123$
Original Annual Cost 3,936,357$
Reduced Annual Cost 3,474,123$
Discount Amount 462,233$
8/31/2020
46
Addendum 2, Amendment 1
Attachment B
2019‐2020 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 South
Fuel True‐Up
Addendum
2
Annual Fuel
true‐up
COVID‐19
Reduction
Addendum 2,
Amendment
1
Cost per gallon $2.50 $1.59 $1.59
Fuel efficiency (mpg)5 4.82 4.82
Miles 503,359 511,664 288,760
Total Annual Cost $251,679.50 $168,785.43 $95,254.85
Total Monthly Cost $20,973.29 $14,065.45 $7,937.90
8 months (August‐March) $167,786.33 $112,523.62 $112,523.62
4 months (April‐July)$31,751.62 $31,751.62
Total Cost to City $144,275.24
Original Annual Cost 251,680$
Reduced Annual Cost 144,275$
Discount Amount 107,404$
8/31/2020
47
EXHIBIT 4 ADDENDUM NO. 3
Attachment A1 FTN Definition
Attachment A2 FTN Corridors
Attachment B 2020-21 Baseline
Attachment C1 NTD Profile
Attachment C2 Cost per Mile
Attachment C3 Paratransit
Attachment C4 Funding for 2020-21 Transit Service Cost Calculator
Worksheet
8/31/2020
48
1
ADDENDUM NO. 3
TO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
TRANSIT MASTER PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
(2020-21 FTN Routes)
This Addendum No. 3 (“Addendum”) to that certain Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah
Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement (“ILA”) is made this
____ day of August, 2020, by and between Utah Transit Authority, a public transit district
organized under the laws of the State of Utah (“UTA”), and Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah
municipal corporation (“City”). UTA and City are hereinafter collectively referred to as “Parties”
and each may be referred to individually as “Party,” all as governed by the context in which such
words are used.
RECITALS
A. On the 6th day of March, 2019, the Parties entered into the ILA, whereby the parties
agreed to participate jointly in planning and funding for public transportation improvements in and
around the City; and
B. Pursuant to the terms of the ILA, the Parties desire to specifically identify certain
components of the Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan to be governed by this Addendum.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Pursuant to Section 3 of the ILA, the City, in cooperation with UTA, identified the
City-sponsored frequent transit network routes for the 2020-21 (“FTN Routes”) to be provided by
UTA for a one-year period from the August 2020 change day until the next succeeding August
change day.
2. The description of those 2020-21 FTN Routes is set forth in Attachment 1.
3. The description of the 2020-21 Baseline Services is set forth in Attachment 2.
4. The calculation of the Annual Service Mile Charge for the City-sponsored 2020-
21 FTN Routes is set forth in in Attachment 3.
5. The final routing and implementation of the FTN Routes shall be determined in
accordance with all applicable laws, regulations and policies regarding transit service planning
(including, without limitation, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act) and operational considerations
shall be addressed in consultation with the City.
6. Invoicing for implementation of the FTN Routes will be according to Section 7 of
the ILA.
7. UTA will maintain the span of service on the FTN routes during the term of this
Addendum. Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, however, UTA may change the frequency
of the FTN Routes as necessary based upon official guidance from the CDC, the State of Utah, the
Salt Lake County Health Department, and/or Salt Lake City emergency proclamations, as well as
significant changes in ridership. If the frequency of service of the FTN Routes is reduced below
the levels set forth in Attachment 1, UTA shall provide written notice to the City of UTA’s
intention to reduce the frequency of the FTN Routes. If the City agrees with such reductions in
service, then UTA will reduce the monthly invoice amounts (as calculated under Section 7 of the
8/31/2020
49
2
ILA) immediately in proportion to the reduction in services until full service, including frequency
and span, of the FTN Routes is restored. The City and UTA shall agree in writing on the levels of
service reductions and the amount of the discount of the monthly invoices prior to any reduction
of frequency of the FTN Routes.
8. This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
9. This Addendum is limited to the terms expressly provided herein and except as set
forth herein, the ILA shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there
is a conflict between this Addendum and the ILA, the terms of this Addendum shall prevail and
control.
10. Any capitalized terms that are not specifically defined in this Addendum shall have
the meanings set forth in the ILA.
11. This Addendum will become effective upon Salt Lake City Council’s adoption of
a resolution authorizing the Mayor or her designee to enter into this Addendum; and appropriation
of funding to meet the City’s financial obligations under this Addendum (the “Effective Date”).
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
8/31/2020
50
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Addendum as of the Effective
Date.
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 3 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
By______________________________________
Its______________________________________
By______________________________________
Its______________________________________
Approved as to Form
____________________________________
UTA Legal Counsel
8/31/2020
51
4
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 3 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By______________________________________
Its______________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
By: ____________________________
Senior City Attorney
Date: ___________________________
ATTEST & COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office
By: ____________________________
City Recorder
[Attach Salt Lake City Council Resolution Approving Addendum]
8/31/2020
52
5
ATTACHMENT A
Description of the 2020-21 FTN Routes
For This Addendum No. 3
8/31/2020
53
14| SALT LAKE CITY TRANSIT MASTER PLAN | EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Transit Master Plan provides a vision for
an expanded Frequent Transit Network (FTN);
it is a long-term, 20-year vision that identifies
the corridors where high-frequency service
should be provided in Salt Lake City. Building
off the existing grid network, the FTN is a
set of designated transit corridors that offers
frequent and reliable service connecting major
destinations and neighborhood centers seven
days a week throughout the day and evening.
The lines on the FTN map (following page) do
not represent individual routes, but are corridors
where frequent service would be provided
by a combination of bus or rail technologies.
Defining an FTN vision allows Salt Lake City to
work closely with Utah Transit Authority (UTA)
to set priorities for service provision now and
in the future.
SALT LAKE CITY'S
Radial(Hub and Spoke)HybridGrid
Why a Grid Network?
Salt Lake City’s existing, centralized hub model
is effective for regional connections but is
inefficient for some local trips. Currently, many of
UTA’s routes terminate at Central Station, which
provides good connectivity to commuter rail
service, but creates challenges for people who
need to travel to other destinations throughout
the city, necessitating multiple transfers and/or
indirect trips. The FTN builds on Salt Lake City’s
strong street network grid.
Frequent Transit
Network
Sunday
Monday - Friday
4
AM
6 8 10 12
PM
2 4 6 8 10 12
AM
Hours of Service
Saturday
15 minutes
(or better)
30 minutes
Frequency
Sunday
Monday - Friday
4
AM
6 8 10 12
PM
2 4 6 8 10 12
AM
Hours of Service
Saturday
15 minutes
(or better)
30 minutes
Frequency
FTN Frequency and Span
Radial vs. Grid Network
8/31/2020
54
Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan
Phase I Service Improvements Legend
UTA Rail
Funded I
0 10.5 Mile
Redwood Road2100 E2100 S
1700 S
1300 S
600 N
California Ave
Indiana Ave West Temple900 S
South Temple
300 WPoplar Grove Blvd University Blvd
State St700 E900 E1300 E200 S
North Temple
1000 N
Foothill Dr
S Campus Dr
N Campus Dr
Mario Capecchi Dr900 WNavajo StUnfunded
8/31/2020
55
6
ATTACHMENT B
2020-21 Baseline Services
For This Addendum No. 3
8/31/2020
56
2020 Sponsored Service Baseline Calculation
Assessment of Sponsored Routes
Route Weekday Saturday Sunday
2 yes no yes City sponsorship of additional Saturday miles above April 2019 baseline
9 no no no City sponsorship of all additional service above April 2019 baseline
21 yes no yes City sponsorship of additional Saturday miles above April 2019 baseline
Weekday Miles
Route April 2019 August 2019 Delta *252 WKD
2 525.23 603.81 78.58 19,802.16
21 928.47 1123.52 195.05 49,152.60
68,954.76
Sunday Miles
Route April 2019 August 2019 Delta *52 SUN
2 255.8 255.8 13,301.60
21 216.75 450.69 233.94 12,164.88
25,466.48
94,421.24 Total delta ‐ miles to be covered by UTA
8/31/2020
57
2020 Comprehensive System Analysis
LEGEND
Quantity % of Total
exceeds standards (under served)16 14%
meets standards 86 75%
partially meets standards 9 8%
does not meet standards (over served)3 3%
All‐Day Service
Route Current Tier
People‐
Based TPI
WKD
Pass/Hr SAT Pass/Hr SUN
Pass/Hr
2 1 689 34.8 16.2 15.4
3 2 447 30.9 11
4 2 325 16.1 11 8.6
6 2 598 19.3 11.7 9.1
9 1 346 12 6.9 7.5
11 3 472 16.9
17 3 303 16.7
21 1 307 29.4 13.3 15.8
33 1 136 25.9 29.2 26.3
35M 1 89 19.2 20.5
35 2 172 22.1 19.9 23.2
39 1 209 28.2 24 20.7
41 1 225 22.1 17.1 16.9
45 1 148 21.6 22.3 16.8
47 1 206 22.1 17.7 15.6
54 1 175 22 25.3 23.3
62 3 124 13.8 10.1
72 3 148 24.6 17
F94 3 117 16.4 10.4
200 1 383 30 22.9 24.1
201 3 168 23 16.6
205 1 406 26.9 25.2 22.6
209 1 319 26.1 25.6 23.5
213 2 263 20.6 9.8
217 1 227 26.2 25.9 23.7
218 2 92 20.9 15.7
220 1 295 18.4 13.9 12.7
223 3 199 10.3
227 3 133 12.1
232 3 168 12.4
240 2 208 16.6 14.8 15
248 3 206 11.8
F400 3 45 7.2
F402 3 63 6.6
F453 3 8 7.3
455 3 144 12.7
470 2 136 16.7 14.1 12.2
F504 3 65 8 6.3
509 2 128 20.6 10.6
8/31/2020
58
F514 3 57 11.3 6.2
F518 3 48 8.3
519 2 239 14.2 16.2 12.5
520 3 244 14.3
525 2 159 30.8 14.7
F546 3 67 4.8
F547 3 52 7
F556 3 126 10.4 7.3
F570 3 119 8.3
F578 3 136 9.3 9.3
F590 3 92 12.6
601 2 203 11 13.9
603 1 239 29.5 21.4 18.9
604 2 70 13.4 9.7
F605 3 87 5.8
612 1 145 18.1 14.1 16
613 3 70 13.3
F618 3 64 11 4.7
F620 3 48 6.4
625 2 147 12.4 7.8
626 2 51 13.8 10
627 2 106 13.8 8.1
628 2 73 20.1 19.6
630 3 48 12.4 13.1
F638 3 79 9.1
640 2 114 11.8 6.8
645 2 214 11.4 8
667 2 30 28.4 52.8
701 1 372 136.7 162.3 75.7
703 1 356 162.3 172.8 63.4
704 1 463 142.2 127 68.1
720 1 860 56.6 65.8 46.4
750 2 1341 163.5 109.8
821 3 69 16.1 13.6
830X 1 581 60.2 51.8
831 2 373 25 13
833 3 72 12.2 10.5
834 3 188 18.6 12.5
841 2 185 80.6 22.8
850 1 157 19.1 19.3 10
862 2 155 24.7 10
864 3 13 13.5
871 3 18 7.6 6.6 7.6
Targeted Service
Route Current Tier
Job‐ Based
TPI
WKD
PassMi/ Mi
SAT PassMi/
Mi
SUN
PassMi/ Mi
2X 4 429 9.7
307 4 863 7.4
313 4 323 6
320 4 896 9.8
354 4 318 7.3
8/31/2020
59
451 4 198 27.1
454 4 170 6.1
456 4 64 11.8
460 4 611 5.2
461 4 469 5.5
462 4 630 8.2
463 4 514 6
471 4 613 7.9
472 4 177 21.7
473 4 289 14.9
513 4 337 5.2
F522 4 109 0.7
526 4 98 16.6
F534 4 140 1.8
551 4 75 13.8 10.7 7.7
606 4 123 19.8
608 4 192 14.7
616 4 40 1.5
650 4 139 7.6
805 4 51 8.3
806 4 52 9.7
807 4 115 8.2
809 4 267 1.1
822 4 284 8.3
902 4 403 3
919 4 1016 26.5
920 4 930 26.1
953 4 132 7.6 10.7 5.2
8/31/2020
60
7
ATTACHMENT C
Funding for 2020-21 Transit Service
For This Addendum No. 3
8/31/2020
61
http://www.rideuta.com/Utah Transit Authority
669 West 200 South 2018 Annual Agency Profile
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
General Information Financial Information
Urbanized Area Statistics - 2010 Census Service Consumption Database Information Sources of Operating Funds Expended Operating Funding Sources
Salt Lake City-West Valley City, UT 358,146,681 Annual Passenger Miles (PMT)NTDID:80001 Fares and Directly Generated $84,206,427 19.6%
278 Square Miles 44,176,331 Annual Unlinked Trips (UPT)Reporter Type:Full Reporter Local Funds $283,418,933 66.0%
1,021,243 Population 151,901 Average Weekday Unlinked Trips State Funds $0 0.0%
42 Pop. Rank out of 498 UZAs 75,207 Average Saturday Unlinked Trips Federal Assistance $61,759,422 14.4%
Other UZAs Served 29,911 Average Sunday Unlinked Trips
77 Ogden-Layton, UT, 82 Provo-Orem, UT, 0 Utah Non-UZA Total Operating Funds Expended $429,384,782 100.0%
Service Area Statistics Service Supplied Sources of Capital Funds Expended
737 Square Miles 39,149,927 Annual Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM)Fares and Directly Generated $0 0.0%
1,883,504 Population 2,160,581 Annual Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH)Local Funds $46,753,477 54.3%
1,113 Vehicles Operated in Maximum Service (VOMS)State Funds $7,479,676 8.7%
1,388 Vehicles Available for Maximum Service (VAMS)Federal Assistance $31,806,236 37.0%
Capital Funding Sources
Modal Characteristics Total Capital Funds Expended $86,039,389 100.0%
Modal Overview Summary of Operating Expenses (OE)
Mode
Directly
Operated
Purchased
Transportation
Revenue
Vehicles
Systems and
Guideways
Facilities and
Stations Other Total Labor $210,617,778 70.0%
Commuter Bus 43 - $0 $14,777 $13,468 $19,269 $47,514 Materials and Supplies $49,475,245 16.4%
Commuter Rail 50 - $0 $9,023,656 $84,673 $99,256 $9,207,585 Purchased Transportation $4,725,168 1.6%
Demand Response 67 45 $3,534,540 $37,536 $68,374 $49,876 $3,690,326 Other Operating Expenses $36,135,860 12.0%
Light Rail 92 - $0 $12,002,130 $626,659 $163,734 $12,792,523 Total Operating Expenses $300,954,051 100.0%
Bus 412 6 $19,675,338 $2,157,049 $6,063,861 $326,885 $28,223,133 Reconciling OE Cash Expenditures $128,430,731
Vanpool 398 - $1,149,248 $85,204 $30,099 $113,214 $1,377,765 Purchased Transportation
Total 1,062 51 $24,359,126 $23,320,352 $6,887,134 $772,234 $55,338,846 (Reported Separately)$0
Fare Revenues: 19.6%Local Funds: 66.%Federal Assistance: 14.4%Local Funds: 54.3% State Funds: 8.7% Federal Assistance: 37.%
Operation Characteristics
Mode
Operating
Expenses Fare Revenues
Uses of
Capital Funds
Annual
Passenger Miles
Annual Vehicle
Revenue Miles
Annual Vehicle
Revenue Hours
Commuter Bus $8,635,671 $521,819 $47,514 12,395,920 563,563 1,066,181 41,128 0.0 47 43 8.5%12.6
Commuter Rail $43,421,951 $7,375,985 $9,207,585 129,673,508 5,082,168 5,429,232 164,930 174.5 69 50 27.5%17.2
Demand Response $18,695,571 $400,466 $3,690,326 4,567,676 394,816 2,798,928 180,342 0.0 142 112 21.1%4.3
Light Rail $71,414,293 $18,089,935 $12,792,523 89,112,550 17,899,716 6,655,535 362,257 93.9 114 92 19.3%11.3
Bus $140,001,661 $17,788,256 $28,223,133 79,344,438 19,061,372 16,845,223 1,243,058 0.0 531 418 21.3%7.9
Vanpool $18,784,904 $3,946,125 $1,377,765 43,052,589 1,174,696 6,354,828 168,866 0.0 485 398 17.9%5.4
Total $300,954,051 $48,122,586 $55,338,846 358,146,681 44,176,331 39,149,927 2,160,581 268.4 1,388 1,113 19.8%
Performance Measures
Mode Mode
Commuter Bus $8.10 $209.97 Commuter Bus $0.70 $15.32 0.5 13.7
Commuter Rail $8.00 $263.28 Commuter Rail $0.33 $8.54 0.9 30.8
Demand Response $6.68 $103.67 Demand Response $4.09 $47.35 0.1 2.2
Light Rail $10.73 $197.14 Light Rail $0.80 $3.99 2.7 49.4
Bus $8.31 $112.63 Bus $1.76 $7.34 1.1 15.3
Vanpool $2.96 $111.24 Vanpool $0.44 $15.99 0.2 7.0
Total $7.69 $139.29 Total $0.84 $6.81 1.1 20.4
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Bus
OE/VRM $6.51 $6.46 #$7.68 #$7.37 #$8.21 #$8.31 Light Rail 2006: 6.51 2007: 6.46 2008: 6.79 2009: 7.68 2010: 7.28 2011: 7.37 2012: 7.63 2013: 8.21 2014: 7.88 2015: 8.31
OE/PMT $1.04 $0.83 #$1.98 #$1.20 #$1.45 #$1.76 2006: 1.04 2007: .83 2008: .87 2009: 1.98 2010: 1.44 2011: 1.2 2012: 1.19 2013: 1.45 2014: 1.5 2015: 1.76
UPT/VRM 1.23 1.32 #1.45 #1.33 #1.24 #1.13 2006: 1.23 2007: 1.32 2008: 1.36 2009: 1.45 2010: 1.28 2011: 1.33 2012: 1.4 2013: 1.24 2014: 1.17 2015: 1.13
OE/VRM $8.74 $8.62 #$7.11 #$8.03 #$10.08 #$10.73 2006: 8.74 2007: 8.62 2008: 9.06 2009: 7.11 2010: 6.87 2011: 8.03 2012: 8.22 2013: 10.08 2014: 9.61 2015: 10.73
OE/PMT $0.48 $0.49 #$0.53 #$0.54 #$0.72 #$0.80 2006: .48 2007: .49 2008: .49 2009: .53 2010: .53 2011: .54 2012: .55 2013: .72 2014: .7 2015: .8
UPT/VRM 4.03 4.12 #2.93 #3.09 #2.88 #2.69 2006: 4.03 2007: 4.12 2008: 3.99 2009: 2.93 2010: 2.87 2011: 3.09 2012: 2.98 2013: 2.88 2014: 2.8 2015: 2.69
Notes:
ªDemand Response - Taxi (DT) and non-dedicated fleets do not report fleet age data.
Average Fleet
Age in Yearsª
Annual
Unlinked Trips
Percent
Spare Vehicles
Vehicles Operated
in Maximum Service Uses of Capital Funds
Fixed Guideway
Directional
Route Miles
Vehicles Available
for Maximum
Service
Vehicles Operated in
Maximum Service
Service Efficiency Service Effectiveness
Operating Expenses per
Vehicle Revenue Mile
Operating Expenses per
Vehicle Revenue Hour
Operating Expenses per
Passenger Mile
Operating Expenses per
Unlinked Passenger Trip
Unlinked Trips per
Vehicle Revenue Mile
Unlinked Trips per
Vehicle Revenue Hour
19.6%
66.0%
14.4%
54.3%
8.7%
37.0%
$0.00
$2.00
$4.00
$6.00
$8.00
$10.00
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue
Mile: Bus
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Operating Expense per Passenger Mile:
Bus
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle
Revenue Mile: Bus
$0.00
$5.00
$10.00
$15.00
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Operating Expense per Vehicle Revenue
Mile: Light Rail
$0.00
$0.20
$0.40
$0.60
$0.80
$1.00
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Operating Expense per Passenger Mile:
Light Rail
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Unlinked Passenger Trip per Vehicle
Revenue Mile: Light Rail
8/31/2020
62
2018 NTD Operating Expenses by ModeLess Fuel Costs (Diesel, CNG and Gasoline) Add Capital Maintenance Debt Service Depreciation Total CostsAnnual Vehicle Revenue MilesCost Per Vehicle Revenue Mile Without Fuel excluding Vehicle DepreciationBus Service 140,001,661$ (10,183,098)$ 5,973,050$ 17,144,993$ 152,936,606$ 16,845,223 8.06$ Bus ServiceCommuter Bus 8,635,671$ (635,588)$ 382,833$ 8,382,916$ 1,066,181 7.86$ Commuter BusCommuter Rail 43,421,951$ (7,002,733)$ 1,287,135$ 45,500,194$ 28,412,725$ 111,619,272$ 5,429,232 15.33$ Commuter RailLight Rail71,414,293$ 11,146,472$ 45,500,194$ 28,412,725$ 156,473,684$ 6,655,535 19.24$ Light RailParatransit Service18,695,571$ (1,367,502)$ 672,761$ 4,290,318$ 22,291,148$ 2,798,928 6.43$ Paratransit ServiceOther Service 18,784,904$ (963,770)$ 180,162$ 2,304,317$ 20,305,613$ 6,354,828 2.83$ Other Service NTD Totals 300,954,051$ (20,152,691)$ 19,642,413$ 91,000,388$ 80,565,077$ 472,009,238$ 39,149,927 10.00$ Fuel Costs20,152,691$ NTD Plus Fuel492,161,929$ CAFR plus $38,654,1(capital maintenance)492,161,929$ Difference‐$ Utah Transit AuthorityOperating Cost per Mile by Mode 2018Sources: 2018 Federal Transit Administration's National Transit Database (NTD), Agency Profile,https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/transit‐agency‐profiles2018 Utah Transit Authority Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), http://www.rideuta.com/About‐UTA/UTA‐Reports‐and‐Documents8/31/2020 63
SPONSORED SERVICE PARATRANSIT COST ‐ Addendum 341,128 Commuter Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD)362,257 Light Rail Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD)1,243,058 Bus Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD)1,646,443 Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and LRT180,342 Total Demand Response Vehicle Revenue Hours (2018 NTD)11% Demand Response Percentage of Total Vehicle Revenue Hours for Bus, Commuter Bus, and Light Rail8/31/2020 64
Addendum 32020‐2021 Sponsored Service: 200 South, 900 South, 2100 SouthVARIABLE VALUESSPONSORED SERVICE COST 8.06$ Most recent NTD Cost per Revenue Mile, Bus Service (1)8.06$ Most recent NTD Cost Per Mile ‐ Bus Service2.2% Annual escalator rate (2)2 Number of Years since NTD report8.42$ NDT rate Adjusted to Service Year Costs20% Administrative Discount (3)6.73$ Discounted NTD Adjusted to Service Year Costs491,862 Sponsored Revenue Miles: 200 South, 900 South and 2100 South491,862 Sponsored Revenue Miles3,311,538.42$ Total Mileage Cost, Without Fuel, Annual 11% Sponsored Paratransit Service rate (4)362,727.08$ Add Paratransit Service3,674,265.50$ Total Annual Operating Costs without fuel2.00$ Fuel Cost per Gallon (Service Year Budgeted Cost)2.00$ Fuel Cost per Gallon4.8 Fuel Efficiency, Miles per Gallon (adjust per vehicle type)4.8 Bus Miles per Gallon491,862 Sponsored Revenue Miles204,942.43$ Total Fuel Cost41,088$ Sponsored Vehicle Lease Costs41,088.45$ Per Vehicle Principal + 4% Interest Rate, Annual10 Sponsored Vehicles10 Vehicles needed for sponsored service410,884.50$ Total Annual Vehicle Cost for Sponsored Service4,290,092.44$ TOTAL4,446,267.79$ original cost of sponsored service4,290,092.44$ new cost after baseline adjustment156,175.35$ value of service being added to UTA baseline(1) NTD Cost per Revenue Mile has been adjusted to exclude fuel expense but does include approximately 2% for capital maintenance (e.g. engine replacement, etc).(2) The annual escalator is a calculated average of the CPI‐U over a twenty year period.(3) UTA will discount the administrative charges in proportion to the scale of the service increase in revenue miles.(4) Paratransit Service rate is equal to the percentage of the most recent NTD reported total demand response vehicle revenue hours as compared to total vehicle revenue hours for Bus, Commuter Bus and Light Rail.8/31/2020 65
EXHIBIT 5 UTA Service Design Guidelines (April 2020)
8/31/2020
66
April 2020
8/31/2020
67
1
Service Design Guidelines
April 2020
8/31/2020
68
2
Contents
Levels of Service ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Tier 1: 15-minute peak service .................................................................................................................. 3
Tier 2: 30-minute peak service .................................................................................................................. 4
Tier 3: 60-minute service .......................................................................................................................... 5
Tier 4: Peak-Only Service .......................................................................................................................... 6
Other Service............................................................................................................................................. 7
Service Standards .......................................................................................................................................... 7
Vehicle Loads ............................................................................................................................................ 7
Vehicle Headways ..................................................................................................................................... 7
Operational Performance ......................................................................................................................... 8
On-Time Performance ........................................................................................................................... 8
Other Operational Performance Metrics .................................................................................................. 8
Service Availability & Stop Spacing ........................................................................................................... 9
Stop Amenities Distribution ...................................................................................................................... 9
Vehicle Assignment ................................................................................................................................. 12
8/31/2020
69
3
Levels of Service
Tier 1: 15-minute peak service
Minimum Level of Service:
Sun Mon - Fri Sat
5 AM – 6 AM
30-min service
5 AM – 6 AM
30-min service
7 AM – 7 PM
30-min service
6 AM – 7 PM
15-min service
6 AM – 7 PM
15-min service
7 PM – 12 AM
30-min service
7 PM – 12 AM
30-min service
To qualify for Tier 1 service, one of the following conditions must be met:
- Route is designated as a Core Route
- Route has a people-based Transit Propensity Index (TPI) per mile greater than 300
- Route carries at least 20 Passengers per Hour (PPH) on weekdays and Saturdays
- Route carries at least 10 Passengers per Hour (PPH) on Sundays
- Route is sponsored by a third party to sustain the level of service
Routes may run above the minimum level of service if system considerations require and productivity
levels are met.
Tier 1 routes with sufficient propensity but not productivity will run the minimum level of service and
are subject to analysis to determine ways to improve ridership performance.
Changes in TPI due to significant land use, demographic, or other changes in the service area will also be
analyzed to determine if changes to minimum level of service are necessary.
Sponsored routes will run irrespective of TPI and PPH, but UTA may work with sponsors to make
adjustments to routes to improve performance.
8/31/2020
70
4
Tier 2: 30-minute peak service
Minimum Level of Service:
Sun Mon - Fri Sat
6 AM – 9 PM
30-min service
6 AM – 9 PM
60-min service
To qualify for Tier 2 service, one of the following conditions must be met:
- Route has a people-based TPI per mile greater than 200
- Route carries at least 10 PPH
- Route is sponsored by a third party to maintain the level of service
Routes may run above the minimum level of service, including on Sunday, if system considerations
require and productivity levels are met.
Routes with sufficient propensity but not productivity will run the minimum level of service and are
subject to analysis to determine ways to improve ridership performance.
Tier 2 routes that consistently perform at Tier 1 levels of productivity will be analyzed to determine the
feasibility of increasing minimum level of service.
Changes in TPI due to significant land use, demographic, or other changes in the service area will also be
analyzed to determine if changes to minimum level of service are necessary.
Sponsored routes will run irrespective of TPI and PPH, but UTA may work with sponsors to make
adjustments to routes to improve performance.
8/31/2020
71
5
Tier 3: 60-minute service
Minimum Level of Service:
Sun Mon - Fri Sat
6 AM – 9 PM
60-min service
To qualify for Tier 3 service, one of the following conditions must be met:
- Route has a people-based TPI per mile greater than 100
- Route carries a PPH of 5 or greater:
o PPH > 5: Flex Route
o PPH > 10: Flex Route or Fixed Route
- Route is sponsored by a third party to maintain the level of service
Routes may run above the minimum level of service, including on weekends, if system considerations
require and productivity levels are met.
Routes with sufficient propensity but not productivity will run the minimum level of service and are
subject to analysis to determine ways to improve ridership performance.
Tier 3 routes that consistently perform at Tier 2 levels of productivity will be analyzed to determine the
feasibility of increasing minimum level of service.
Changes in TPI due to significant land use, demographic, or other changes in the service area will also be
analyzed to determine if changes to minimum level of service are necessary.
Sponsored routes will run irrespective of TPI and PPH, but UTA may work with sponsors to make
adjustments to routes to improve performance.
8/31/2020
72
6
Tier 4: Peak-Only Service
Minimum Level of Service:
Sun Mon - Fri Sat
6 AM – 9 AM
60-min service
3 PM – 6 PM
60-min service
To qualify for Tier 4 service, one of the following conditions must be met:
- Route has a job-based TPI per mile of greater than 100
- Route has a Passenger Miles Traveled (PMT) per mile of 7 or greater
- Route is sponsored by a third party to maintain the level of service
Routes may run above the minimum level of service if system considerations require and productivity
levels are met.
Routes with sufficient propensity but not productivity will run the minimum level of service and are
subject to analysis to determine ways to improve ridership performance.
Tier 4 minimum level of service is determined independently from other tiers; Tier 4 routes are not
subject to be upgraded to other tiers unless changes in people-based TPI show that analysis is necessary.
Changes in job-based TPI due to significant land use, demographic, or other changes in the service area
will also be analyzed to determine if changes to minimum level of service are necessary.
Sponsored routes will run irrespective of TPI and PMT/mi, but UTA may work with sponsors to make
adjustments to routes to improve performance.
8/31/2020
73
7
Other Service
Areas that do not have sufficient TPI, productivity, or sponsorship to qualify for any of the above tiers of
service will not be served by fixed-route or flex-route transit. UTA will work with local communities and
stakeholders to implement other mobility solutions. Other mobility solutions include (but are not limited
to):
• UTA-operated demand-responsive transit (DRT)
• Contractor-operated DRT
• UTA Vanpool and/or Ride Van Plus
• Partnership with Transportation Network Company (TNC)
• Employer-sponsored shuttles
• Transportation Management Associations
Service Standards
Vehicle Loads
UTA has set the following standard for vehicle loads:
For Bus Rapid Transit and peak only service, the median maximum load on a trip should be no greater
than the vehicle seating capacity.
For other fixed-route bus services and commuter rail, the median maximum load on a trip is no greater
than 150% of seating capacity.
Light rail has determined that average weekly loads on regularly scheduled trips should not exceed
100% of the seating capacity. If the loads regularly exceed capacity, then vehicles will be added to the
consist until the maximum consist size is reached. Thereafter loads should not exceed 150% of seating
capacity.
Vehicle Headways
The average number of minutes between regional commuter trains should not exceed 60 minutes. The
average number of minutes between light rail trains should not exceed 20 minutes.
UTA’s Service Design Guidelines identify four tiers or minimum levels of bus service. Route alignments
and level of service are based on current or modeled productivity, the propensity of the alignment for
transit use, as well as service design guidelines for route and stop spacing.
The transit propensity index is calculated based on a combination of factors – minority population
density, transit supportive population density, job density, intersection density, higher-education
student density, intersection density, and zero-car household density.
8/31/2020
74
8
Operational Performance
On-Time Performance
UTA tracks on-time reliability for all routes. A variety of root causes affect reliability, including traffic and
weather conditions, operator driving styles, vehicle types, and scheduled running times. UTA will
evaluate whether adjustments to routing/stops are necessary when:
• The on-time performance for the whole route is consistently below 88%
• Running time adjustments to individual trips are so large that they disrupt the cycle time of the
whole route
For commuter rail service, on-time is defined as departing stations 0 seconds early and less than 5
minutes late. The on-time standard is 88% on-time for all departures. UTA continuously monitors on-
time performance and conducts analysis to determine root causes of non-standard performance then
makes adjustments where feasible.
For light rail service, on-time is defined as departing stations 0 seconds early and less than 5 minutes
late. The on-time standard is 88% on-time for all departures. Light rail service is continually monitored
and schedule adjustments or other corrective action taken annually at a minimum.
For fixed-route bus, on-time is defined as departing time point crossings 0 seconds early and less than 5
minutes late for regular fixed-route and 0 seconds early and less than 15 minutes late for flex routes.
UTA will evaluate whether adjustments are necessary when:
• The on-time performance for the whole route is consistently below 88%
• Running time adjustments to individual trips are so large that they disrupt the cycle time of the
whole route
For paratransit, on-time is defined as at least 90% of customers picked up within 10 minutes before to
20 minutes after the stated pick-up time and 90% of customers dropped off within 30 minutes of any
stated appointment time.
Other Operational Performance Metrics
In addition to on-time reliability, UTA tracks other operational performance metrics such as Miles per
Service Interruption and Avoidable Accidents. Performance in these metrics is not typically affected by
the design of the service; however, in special cases UTA may evaluate whether changes to the service
plan are necessary to improve operational performance without negatively impacting the riding
customer.
8/31/2020
75
9
Service Availability & Stop Spacing
Recommended route spacing for fixed and flex routes in the UTA system is as follows:
Environment Stop Spacing (in feet)
Central Business District 1/8 mile to 1/4 mile
Urban 1/4 mile to 1/2 mile
Suburban 1/2 mile to 1 mile
Rural (as needed based on surrounding development and
activities)
Exceptions to route spacing guidelines may be justified to accommodate street grid patterns and/or
preserve access to major destinations. Where routes converge on a major destination, a small amount
of duplication may be necessary.
Stop Amenities Distribution
UTA is responsible for establishing a policy for how transit amenities are added to the system and
ensuring the equitable distribution of amenities throughout the service area. “Transit amenities” refer
to items of comfort, convenience, and safety that are available to the general riding public. They include,
but are not limited to items such as seating, shelters, canopies, provisional information, escalators,
elevators, and waste receptacles. Additionally, UTA is making efforts to upgrade existing stops to the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.
In accordance with this requirement, UTA has developed a master plan outlining all of the criteria
involved in prioritizing which stops will receive improvements, what improvements are warranted based
on use, and outlines construction specs for improvements. The Bus Stop Master Plan outlines and
encourages partnerships with local government and property owners to improve the accessibility,
comfort, and convenience of the riding public.
The creation of this document required an extensive inventory of all of UTA’s 6,055 bus stops,
standardizing the specifications by which all stops would be improved and updating UTA’s decision
making matrix for prioritizing what amenities will be added to a stop.
8/31/2020
76
10
Category 1 Point 2 Points 3 Points 4 Points 5 Points
Non-ADA Compliant* - - - - Yes
Total Stop Activity (TSA)
– Average Daily
Weekday**
1 to 19 20 to 39 40 to 59 60 to 79 80 +
Total Annual Bus Ramp
Deployments 1 to 49 50 to 99 100 – 149 150 – 199 200+
Transfer Point***
Equal to or Greater than
30 min. freq. 1 Route 2 Routes 3 Routes 4 Routes 5+ Routes
Less than 29 the min.
freq. 1 Route 2 Routes 3 Routes 4 Routes 5+ Routes
Serves Title VI
Community
Title VI
Route/Area
Safety
Intersection
1 of 5
Elements
2 of 5
Elements
3 of 5
Elements
4 of 5
Elements
5 of 5
Elements
Parking Allowed
Obstacle(s) Present
No lighting Present
Sidewalk Not Level
Social
Education Adjacent Yes
Library Adjacent Yes
* Non-ADA compliant bus stop locations automatically receive five (5) points
** TSA Data is average weekday ridership taken from the last eight change day periods
***One (1) additional point is assessed each route at a transfer point with 30 minute or less frequency
8/31/2020
77
11
UTA bases the recommended level of amenities at bus stops on the headway of the route(s) serving the
stop and the weekday Total Stop Activity (TSA), defined as the sum of boardings and alightings at the
stop:
Stop Level Headway
TSA
(Avg.
Daily) Amenities
Level I - A 15 Min or Less 0 to 9 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
Level I - B Greater than
15 Min 0 to 4 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
Level II - A 15 Min or Less 10 to 39 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
• Trash Can
Level II - B Greater than
15 Min 5 to 9 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
Level III - A 15 Min or Less 40 to 59 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
• Trash Can
• 4’x8’ Shelter
Level III - B Greater than
15 Min 10 to 19 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
• Trash Can
• 4’ x 8’ Shelter
Level IV - A 15 Min or Less 60 to 79 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
• Trash Can
• 6’ x 12’ Shelter
Level IV - B Greater than
15 Min 20 - 29 • Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Bench
• Trash Can
• 6’ x 12’ Shelter
Level V - A 15 Min or Less 80 to 99
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• Two (2) Benches
• 6’ x 12’ Shelter
Level V - B Greater than
15 Min NA
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• 6’ x 12’ Shelter
Level VI - A 15 Min or Less 100 to 49
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• 6’ x 16’ Shelter
• Two (2) Benches
• Light Fixture
8/31/2020
78
12
Level VI - B Greater than
15 Min NA
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• Two (2) Benches
• 6’ x 12’
Shelter**
Level VII - A 15 Min or Less 150 +
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• Two (2) Benches
• Custom Shelter
• Light Fixture
• Digital Sign
Level VII - B Greater than
15 Min NA
• Pole
• Sign
• ADA Pad
• Trash
Can
• Two (2) Benches
• 6’ x 16’ Shelter
For more information on stop amenities, please refer to the Bus Stop Master Plan.
Vehicle Assignment
The guidelines that UTA uses in assigning vehicles to routes are as follows. The quantity of buses in each
Business Unit is determined by the demand, which is the peak pull-out for the calendar year. The
Planning Department from each Business Unit generates information regarding routes and schedules
that is cut into runs and blocks for Operators to work. This information is shared with the respective
Business Units’ Maintenance Departments. Buses are assigned within a service area according to the
characteristics of the service, such as canyon, commuter express, shuttle or regular transit bus service,
passenger loads, and topography of the service area. Specially equipped canyon buses have different
specifications than buses that operate in regular transit service in the valley.
Each Maintenance Department determines vehicle assignment based on criteria stipulated by the
planners and operational characteristics as to what type of equipment is required for each route or
schedule. The vehicle type that can accommodate the runs and blocks is entered into the Fleet Control
Sign-out database software program. Also, the status of buses that are out for repair, body work, or
temporarily out of service is updated in the database.
Vehicles are assigned on a daily basis through a Sign-out Sheet. All-day blocks (runs that are out around
16 hours or more) are typically assigned the same type of bus each day. Any remaining buses are
assigned to tripped blocks (buses sent out during overloads or blocks that are less than 8 hours in
duration). Once the sign-out sheet is generated, the sign-out is sent to Operations Dispatch for Operator
assignment.
8/31/2020
79
EXHIBIT 6 DRAFT ADDENDUM 4
1000 North Mobilization
(information only)
8/31/2020
80
1
ADDENDUM NO. 4
TO SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
TRANSIT MASTER PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
(Mobilization Funding for 1000 North)
This Addendum No. 4 (“Addendum”) to that certain Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah
Transit Authority Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement (“ILA”) is made this
____ day of June, 2020, by and between Utah Transit Authority, a public transit district organized
under the laws of the State of Utah (“UTA”), and Salt Lake City Corporation, a Utah municipal
corporation (“City”) is made and entered into as of the date the Addendum is stamped by the Salt
Lake City Recorder’s Office (“Effective Date”). UTA and City are hereinafter collectively
referred to as “Parties” and each may be referred to individually as “Party,” all as governed by the
context in which such words are used.
RECITALS
A. On the 6th day of March, 2019, the Parties entered into the ILA, whereby the parties
agreed to participate jointly in planning and funding for public transportation improvements in and
around the City; and
B. Pursuant to the terms of the ILA, the Parties desire to specifically identify certain
components of the Salt Lake City Transit Master Plan public transportation improvements to be
governed by this Addendum.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. As contemplated in Section 3 of the ILA, the City, in cooperation with UTA, has
identified and funded a total of four corridors for City-sponsored frequent transit network routes
(“FTN Routes”) to be provided by UTA for a one-year period from the August 2020 change day
until the next succeeding August change day. The corridors are depicted in Attachment A to this
Addendum. Three of the corridors began service in August of 2019, and are subject to other
addenda. These are 200 South, 900 South, and 2100 South. One additional corridor, 1000 North,
is proposed for mobilization in 2020, and is the subject of this Addendum. The service
characteristics of the FTN Routes, the additional vehicles necessary to support the FTN Routes,
and the Annual Service Mile Charge (as such term is defined in the ILA) applicable to the FTN
Routes shall all be memorialized pursuant to an additional addendum to be subsequently executed
by the parties.
2. The term of this Agreement is from the Effective Date until August __, 2021
(“Term”).
3. Pursuant to Section 6 of the ILA, UTA has identified a mobilization charge
reflecting the costs to be incurred by UTA to prepare for the sponsored FTN Routes (the
“Mobilization Funding”). The Mobilization Funding shall be utilized solely for implementation of
the FTN Routes according to the itemized description in Attachment B to this Addendum.
4. UTA shall submit detailed invoices for the Mobilization Funding in accordance
with the milestone payment schedule included as Attachment B. To the extent that the hiring of
additional headcount contemplated in Attachment B does not match the proposed schedule
identified in Attachment B, then UTA shall adjust the invoices for milestone payments to reflect
8/31/2020
81
2
actual hiring of additional headcount during the Term; provided, however, that any adjustment of
amounts invoiced shall not exceed $x during the Term of this Agreement. The City shall pay all
approved invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt. If the City does not approve an invoice, a
written explanation of disputed items will be sent within ten (10) business days of the City’s receipt
of the invoice.
5. This Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures were upon the same instrument.
6. This Addendum is limited to the terms expressly provided herein and except as set
forth herein, the ILA shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. If there
is a conflict between this Addendum and the ILA, the terms of this Addendum shall prevail and
control.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.]
8/31/2020
82
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Addendum effective the date
first set forth herein.
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
By______________________________________
Executive Director
By______________________________________
Acting Chief Service Development Officer
Approved as to Form
____________________________________
UTA Legal Counsel
8/31/2020
83
4
[Signature pages to Addendum No. 4 to Salt Lake City Corporation and Utah Transit Authority
Transit Master Plan Implementation Interlocal Agreement]
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By______________________________________
Its______________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Salt Lake City Attorney’s Office
By: ____________________________
Senior City Attorney
Date: ___________________________
ATTEST & COUNTERSIGN:
Salt Lake City Recorder’s Office
By: ____________________________
City Recorder
[Attach Salt Lake City Council Resolution Approving Addendum]
8/31/2020
84
5
ATTACHMENT A
Description of FTN Routes
For This Addendum No. 4
8/31/2020
85
6
ATTACHMENT B
Funding for Mobilization
For This Addendum No. 4
8/31/2020
86
DRAFT
Addendum 4
1000 North Mobilization (122,274 miles, 22,918 hours)
FTE/Unit Position/Item
Monthly Cost
per FTE/unit January February March April May June July
Mobilization
Total
2 Mechanics 6,423$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 89,922$
1 Fixed Supervisors 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 50,400$
1 TCC Dispatch 5,100$ -$ -$ -$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 20,400$
0 Para Supervisors 7,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
15 Operator Recruitment one time 30,000$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 88,000$
15 Operator Training one time 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 288,000$
15 Operator Service 5,703$ 28,515$ 28,515$ 57,030$ 57,030$ 85,545$ 85,545$ 342,180$
4 Vehicle Procurement 4,858$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,432$ 19,432$ 38,864$
Sub Total 50,046$ 126,561$ 116,561$ 132,176$ 132,176$ 180,123$ 180,123$ 917,766$
20%Administration 10,009$ 25,312$ 23,312$ 26,435$ 26,435$ 36,025$ 36,025$ 183,553$
TOTAL 60,055$ 151,873$ 139,873$ 158,611$ 158,611$ 216,148$ 216,148$ 1,101,319$
1/1/2021 60,055$
2/1/2021 151,873$
3/1/2021 139,873$
4/1/2021 158,611$
5/1/2021 158,611$
6/1/2021 216,148$
7/1/2021 216,148$
TOTAL 1,101,319$
Mobilization Milestone Payments
The above is a not-to-exceed amount,
invoices will be based on actual FTE hires.
8/31/2020
87
EXHIBIT 7 DRAFT ADDENDUM 5
2021-22 Sponsored Service
(information only)
8/31/2020
88
DRAFT
Addendum 4
1000 North Mobilization (122,274 miles, 22,918 hours)
FTE/Unit Position/Item
Monthly Cost
per FTE/unit January February March April May June July
Mobilization
Total
2 Mechanics 6,423$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 12,846$ 89,922$
1 Fixed Supervisors 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 50,400$
1 TCC Dispatch 5,100$ -$ -$ -$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 5,100$ 20,400$
0 Para Supervisors 7,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
15 Operator Recruitment one time 30,000$ 30,000$ 20,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 88,000$
15 Operator Training one time 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 288,000$
15 Operator Service 5,703$ 28,515$ 28,515$ 57,030$ 57,030$ 85,545$ 85,545$ 342,180$
4 Vehicle Procurement 4,858$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,432$ 19,432$ 38,864$
Sub Total 50,046$ 126,561$ 116,561$ 132,176$ 132,176$ 180,123$ 180,123$ 917,766$
20%Administration 10,009$ 25,312$ 23,312$ 26,435$ 26,435$ 36,025$ 36,025$ 183,553$
TOTAL 60,055$ 151,873$ 139,873$ 158,611$ 158,611$ 216,148$ 216,148$ 1,101,319$
1/1/2021 60,055$
2/1/2021 151,873$
3/1/2021 139,873$
4/1/2021 158,611$
5/1/2021 158,611$
6/1/2021 216,148$
7/1/2021 216,148$
TOTAL 1,101,319$
Mobilization Milestone Payments
The above is a not-to-exceed amount,
invoices will be based on actual FTE hires.
8/31/2020
89
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
______________________________
Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Date Received: 12/10/2020
Date Sent to Council: 12/10/2020
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: 12/10/2020
Chris Wharton, Chair
FROM: Rachel Otto, Chief of Staff
Office of the Mayor
SUBJECT: Board Reappointment Recommendation: Police Civilian Review Board
STAFF CONTACT: Sandy Casement
sandy.casement@slcgov.com
Board Reappointment Recommendation:
Police Civilian Review Board
DOCUMENT TYPE:
RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends the Council consider the
recommendation in the attached letter from the Mayor and reappoint Jessica Andrew
as a member of the Police Civilian Review Board.
ERIN MENDENHALL
Mayor
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
P.O. BOX 145474
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-5474 WWW.SLCMAYOR.COM
TEL 801-535-7704
December 10, 2020
Salt Lake City Council
451 S State Street Room 304
PO Box 145476
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Dear Councilmember Wharton,
Listed below is my recommendation for membership reappointment to the Police Civilian Review Board:
Jessica Andrew – to be reappointed for a term ending November 21, 2021. Jessica recently moved to D1
from D7. The board's D1 seat was recently vacated by Kevin Park who was term limited. We are
recommending Jessica finish her first time in the now vacant D1 seat.
I respectfully ask your consideration and support for this reappointment.
Respectfully,
Erin Mendenhall, Mayor
Cc: File
Public Comment Jan. 1st - 8th 2021
Topic Name Comment District
FisherMansion John Clapp I am in support of continued funding to utilize the jewel of a home, the Fisher Mansion. I know the city has
visions and investments including the Folsom Trail , the bridge that was built over the railroad tracks and the
upcoming developments of housing coming to the North temple area, It makes great sense to include the Fisher
Mansions part of the vision for our city. The Jordan River , the bike trails, would only be enriched by the
investment of this building along the Jordan River. Thankyou John Clapp (resident of the Euclid Neighborhood)
n/a
Fleet Block Mary Castellanos I've included the signed petition so far. Please save the murals, we've lost our loved ones in such a horrific way,
please don't take this away from us too, it has brought us a place of peace, new friendships, and support systems.
We have come together to collect for those less fortunate, items such as clothing and food. This could be a very
positive space, we all just need to work together. Thank you Mary Castellanos *See Corresponding Attachment*
5
City Creek Canyon Anonymous The individual who called is concerned about the last of care near the City Creek Canyon area behind the Capitol.
She believes the City should invest more resources in the area.
3
9:56 AM 1/11/2021 Page 1
Public Comment Jan. 1st - 8th 2021
Topic Name Comment District
Crime in District
Five
Dale Scott Good Morning, I live in your district and voted for you. I want to express my absolute disappointment in you're
your ineptitude and failure to represent the people who elected you. Crime in our neighborhood has reached the
point where we are one of the most unsafe places in the city. We have had two murders/shootings in the last few
weeks, both of the perpetrators are still at large. You appear either to be totally out of touch, not bothered or
completely ineffective in doing anything to help us in this situation. The current mayor who preceded you also
seems to have no clue how to deal with the crime in the city overall but at least she was present and visible when
she was our council member. The fact that your nickname in the district is Darin "The Invisible" Mano pretty
much sums up your job performance. Specifically we have a "convenience" store which is actually a head shop
and open air drug market next to an elementary school in the middle of a residential neighborhood. A child was
almost killed in a drive by shooting at this store a few months ago and another drive by shooting resulted in a
murder last week. We have been pleading with you, the mayor and anyone who could help if they cared for
months about this. The owner claims they have never witnessed criminal activity in the area around his
"convenience" store. Everyone knows they're lying but apparently you couldn't care less. Thieves roam the area
every single night trying to steal anything from us that isn't nailed down and then head back to their campsites
which are all over the area. Why is Salt Lake City the only major city I've ever lived in whose police department
has zero interest in community policing? How about cops actually get out of their cars and walk around the
neighborhood including Liberty park getting to know it and the people who live in it? What a novel idea. And
please don't blame the pandemic, they have never patrolled the area for the past decade. I won't even mention
the Hooker Hotels that the city is so proud of that line State street. Please do your constituents a favor and resign
if you can't contribute anything to solving this issue. Sincerely, Dale Scott
5
Crime in District
Five
John Smith Dear Council, You know what was happening at Corner Stop, but you did nothing. This has been forwarded to the
media. How many more people have to die before you do your job?
5
9:56 AM 1/11/2021 Page 2
Recipient:Salt Lake City Council
Letter:Greetings,
Save The Murals!
Signatures
Name Location Date
Melinda Castellanos South Jordan, UT 2020-12-08
Kira Smith Taylorsville, UT 2020-12-08
Rebecca Terry Draper, UT 2020-12-08
Faith Smith Woods Cross, UT 2020-12-08
Shannan Davis Hazen, ND 2020-12-08
Gina Thayne Magna, UT 2020-12-08
Dori Myers Spring Creek, NV 2020-12-08
Sue Wilcox Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-08
Amber Helm Irving, TX 2020-12-08
Perry Tucker Sandy, UT 2020-12-08
Markie Smith Elko, NV 2020-12-08
austin ward Albany, OR 2020-12-08
JON INWOOD Brooklyn, NY 2020-12-08
Gayle Campbell Murray, UT 2020-12-08
Misty Crawford West Valley City, UT 2020-12-08
Ricky D Adams Sandy, UT 2020-12-08
Teeshawn Jackson Bellflower, CA 2020-12-08
Alyssa Hauck Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-08
Cassandra Fuentes Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-08
Dominique Manzanares Midvale, UT 2020-12-08
Name Location Date
David Ligon Salinas, US 2020-12-08
Franco Carlo New York 2020-12-08
Julia Zhu Fremont, US 2020-12-08
Ahanna Jacobs Mcdonough, US 2020-12-08
angela ocon Presidio, US 2020-12-08
Melina Ceja Tracy, US 2020-12-08
Amber Turd Sucks Lampasas, US 2020-12-08
Oliver Byers Sacramento, US 2020-12-08
Asher Rhys Austin, US 2020-12-08
Elliot Hales Colorado Springs, US 2020-12-08
Liliana Oppo West Palm Beach, US 2020-12-08
Paula Knatt Arlington, US 2020-12-08
Caitlin Slobodzian Kenton, US 2020-12-08
phroggie .Newark, US 2020-12-08
Henry M Eugene, US 2020-12-08
Alivia Roberge Berwick, US 2020-12-08
Ella krasnow Watertown, US 2020-12-08
aliyah viscantas Grove City, US 2020-12-08
bianca z Haddonfield, US 2020-12-08
Chelsea Fischer Orlando, FL 2020-12-08
Kelby Clark Union, US 2020-12-08
Mark Carbone Greenwich, US 2020-12-08
Name Location Date
Alena Butler Lehi, US 2020-12-08
Ricky Adams San Marino, UT 2020-12-08
Olivia L New York, US 2020-12-08
Marquez Blanks Columbia, US 2020-12-08
Lamonique Allen Harker Heights, US 2020-12-08
Rosemary Sciarrillo Middlesex, US 2020-12-08
Asmaa Salih Anaheim, US 2020-12-08
Lakeisha Knight Cleveland, US 2020-12-08
briawnna boleman Nashville, US 2020-12-08
ava frame Lebanon, US 2020-12-08
Yarely Rodriguez San Marcos, US 2020-12-08
Emma McKibben Circleville, US 2020-12-08
Michael Tatum Broken arrow, US 2020-12-08
Hannah Linaweaver US 2020-12-08
caroline heyerdahl burke, US 2020-12-08
Michelle Rodriguez Redmond, OR 2020-12-08
Agim Demirovski US 2020-12-08
Kannon Woodrow Augusta, US 2020-12-08
Roopa Reddy Fremont, US 2020-12-08
Basheer Ramjan Newark, US 2020-12-08
Rylee Spoon Casa Grande, US 2020-12-08
Jackie D Matawan, US 2020-12-08
Name Location Date
Darling Aquino Bronx, US 2020-12-08
Alejah Aragon Carson, US 2020-12-08
Madeline Baird Austin, US 2020-12-08
kristine b New York, US 2020-12-08
Gwen Zalace Desoto, US 2020-12-08
Arial Dixon Fort Mill, US 2020-12-08
Sarah Ward Boca Raton, US 2020-12-08
Alize Valle San Antonio, US 2020-12-08
Isabel Colon Shawano, US 2020-12-08
Samantha Becker San Francisco, US 2020-12-08
Abby Oropeza Tucson, US 2020-12-08
Kaleb Tate Thomas, US 2020-12-08
Lillian Green Henderson, US 2020-12-08
Orange Guy Houston, US 2020-12-08
Larry Rogers Baton Rouge, US 2020-12-08
Sadie Davis Redford, US 2020-12-08
Brady Younger Knoxville, US 2020-12-08
Yasmin Pereira US 2020-12-08
Darby Breaux Lawrence, US 2020-12-08
Natalie Meyer US 2020-12-08
Wilhand Grant Brooklyn, US 2020-12-08
Anna Armandi New York, US 2020-12-08
Name Location Date
j town Saint Peters, US 2020-12-08
Lauryn Alajaji Elk Grove, US 2020-12-08
Anti Racists Anti racist pane, US 2020-12-08
Emi Ngu Anaheim, US 2020-12-08
Kayla Stissel Hickory, US 2020-12-08
Berry Zhang Elmhurst, US 2020-12-08
Aidalin Falcon Hempstead, US 2020-12-08
Maa Lamah Newark, US 2020-12-08
Sarah Adams Grove City, US 2020-12-08
zoe c Chicago, US 2020-12-08
Aidan Zou Silver Spring, US 2020-12-08
Randy Avalos Menlo Park, CA 2020-12-09
Ashley Clarke Redondo Beach, US 2020-12-09
Crystal Hall Tampa, FL 2020-12-09
Denise Mccarty Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Christine Case Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Cassandra Chandler Castle Dale, UT 2020-12-09
Clarisa Alderete Pasadena, TX 2020-12-09
Rosa Mercado Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Juan Mercado Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Edwin Mercado Indian Head, MD 2020-12-09
Braxton Harmon Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Angel Moreno Utah, UT 2020-12-09
JackoLine Miller Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Matt Elkins Plano, IL 2020-12-09
Ashlee Gavaldon Tooele, UT 2020-12-09
Thomas Nieland Alamo, TX 2020-12-09
Aris Fragos Greece 2020-12-09
Susan Neese Plainfield, IL 2020-12-09
Karina Palacios Las Vegas, NV 2020-12-09
Carolyn Bettfreund Hurricane, UT 2020-12-09
Jeremy Davies Midvale, UT 2020-12-09
Mike Ramos West Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
SnowOwl Sor-Lokken Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Michael McCune Draper, UT 2020-12-09
Sav P North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-09
Robert Kennedy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
sugarmoon love ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Ruby Mercado Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Janet Cook Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
damon harris salt lake city, UT 2020-12-09
Amy Sanchez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Peggie Hayes Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Alisa Walker North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Eric Jorgensen Orem, UT 2020-12-09
Monica Christensen West Valley City, UT 2020-12-09
Jessica Arthurs Ashburn, VA 2020-12-09
Kiara P Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Niki Venugopal Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-09
Adam Guymon Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Chanel Stewart Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Atherlee Ramirez West Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Austin Holmes West Valley City, UT 2020-12-09
Kaile Akina Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Jade Arter Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Carin Crowe Las Vegas, NV 2020-12-09
Cynda Nygaard Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
daisy gonzalez South salt lake, UT 2020-12-09
Aaron Ogilvie Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Neisha Lockwood Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Kimberly Sanchez Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Mikayla Lynn Vancouver, WA 2020-12-09
Shannon Ackman US 2020-12-09
Justin Larsen West Valley City, UT 2020-12-09
Lupe Gonzalez Las Vegas, NV 2020-12-09
Adrian Lambrinos Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Dana Rossi Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Haylee Monfredi Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Leland McCarthy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Preslie Paur Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Elena Perez Houston, US 2020-12-09
kesh kesh long beach, US 2020-12-09
Maya Williams Crofton, US 2020-12-09
Kresta Best North Las Vegas, US 2020-12-09
Adisa Dervisevic Astoria, US 2020-12-09
T L Denver, US 2020-12-09
ayanna m.Bowie, US 2020-12-09
Aubree Antell Wausau, US 2020-12-09
Sage Namaste-Rose Leaf River, US 2020-12-09
Eliza Ah Verona, US 2020-12-09
Louie Tiel Gilbert, US 2020-12-09
Priscilla g Palmdale, US 2020-12-09
Janel Montano Palm Springs, US 2020-12-09
Shannon Woulfe Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
A G Albuquerque, US 2020-12-09
jhajaira tapia New York, US 2020-12-09
Elly Keever High Point, US 2020-12-09
Gillian Hay Toms River, US 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Alyssa Ali Queens, US 2020-12-09
kyshai milligan pflugerville, US 2020-12-09
Jacqueline Mendoza Santa Ana, US 2020-12-09
Marci Bonham Tooele, UT 2020-12-09
Emma Reinberg Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Red Hawk Hartwell Chicago, IL 2020-12-09
Devin Despain Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Armando Ruiz Denver, CO 2020-12-09
Adam Koritz Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Ashley Bourque American Fork, UT 2020-12-09
Katherine Gardiner Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Avery Overstreet Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Alexandra Wunderlich Park City, UT 2020-12-09
Ben Phan North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-09
Jessica Hayes Murray, UT 2020-12-09
Jessyka Fife Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Jasmine Carlin Sandy, UT 2020-12-09
Akesa Mila Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Ruby Berntsen South Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Calen Smith Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Elsie Valencia Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Kim Dragon US 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Kara Hefley Midvale, UT 2020-12-09
Pearl Northrup Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Angel Camarillo West Valley City, UT 2020-12-09
Allie Ramseyer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Jace Lemp Centerville, UT 2020-12-09
deborah blake Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Vincent Pate Orem, UT 2020-12-09
Katherine Himstedt Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Jackie Daniels-Brown Norwalk, CA 2020-12-09
Dayton Christensen Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Johnny Ause Gualala, CA 2020-12-09
Katy Neilson Smithfield, UT 2020-12-09
cadie Norris Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Xista Garcilazo Mesa, AZ 2020-12-09
Karolyn Campbell Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Susan Mikesell Park City, UT 2020-12-09
Derek Ballard Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Veronica Sierra Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Kelly Lublin West Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Summer Smith Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Landrie Miller Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Janay Oler Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Grace Cunningham Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Anna Coltrin Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Chaleighe Elliott Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Sage Thee Magna, UT 2020-12-09
Laura O'Neill Auckland, New Zealand 2020-12-09
rachel broadbent Utah 2020-12-09
amelie khiar Norwalk, CT 2020-12-09
Parker Mortensen Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Evan Barbosa Chicago, IL 2020-12-09
Amy Larsen Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
VAL DOMINGUES SARATOGA SPRINGS, UT 2020-12-09
Carly Toyn Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Quinn Cornett Tampa, FL 2020-12-09
Amelia Long Lincoln, NE 2020-12-09
Rebecca Tanner Burbank, CA 2020-12-09
Edward Perry Heber City, UT 2020-12-09
Cameron Lee Orem, UT 2020-12-09
Mary Schmitz Willimantic, CT 2020-12-09
Margaret Miller Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Roshawna Carter South Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Melissa Ellsworth Midvale, UT 2020-12-09
Haelee Wood Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Victoria Moreno Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Emmaly Anderson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Ian Harris Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-09
Joshua Johanson West Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Melanie Mercado Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Stephanie Shiver Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Miguel Torres Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Colton Ward Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
mariah Wheaton US 2020-12-09
Sara Fladmo Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Irovel Nunez Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Graycee Kennedy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
susan fleck salt lake city, UT 2020-12-09
biridiana quevedo Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Alexandra Stroud Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Adalina Ramirez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Katie Robinson salt lake city, UT 2020-12-09
Patrick Rogers Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Alyson Pinkelman Seattle, WA 2020-12-09
Jessica Drake Foothill Ranch, CA 2020-12-09
Michael Pepe Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Justice Mercado West Jordan, UT 2020-12-09
Name Location Date
Amber Dwyer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Autumn Anderson Leesburg, VA 2020-12-09
Guisell Vazquez Clearfield, UT 2020-12-09
Erika Torres Ogden, UT 2020-12-09
Alicia Rice Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Ronald Moore Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-09
Nadja Redd Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Lupe Moore Portland, OR 2020-12-10
Del Sahagun Alameda, CA 2020-12-10
Kathryn Phillips American Fork, UT 2020-12-10
Morty Foster Columbus, OH 2020-12-10
Zoë Wooff Portland, OR 2020-12-10
Rachel Gillmor Hamilton Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Arthur Fairchild Batesville, IN 2020-12-10
Timothy Jacobsen North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-10
Elinda McKenna Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jarad Ringer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Melinda Harden Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Susan Bowlden Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jacqueline Salazar Las Vegas, NV 2020-12-10
Mary McKendrick Provo, UT 2020-12-10
mary vaughan sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Julia Dressman Provo, UT 2020-12-10
Chelsie Ross Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Oliver Harrington Riverton, UT 2020-12-10
Jennica Earle Las Vegas, NV 2020-12-10
Lisa Lofstrom Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Dianne Olson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Clyde Ashby Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jenni FooFoo West Jordan, UT 2020-12-10
Liz Maryon Bountiful, UT 2020-12-10
Sara Lambrinos Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Ed Corvera Midvale, UT 2020-12-10
Jessica Peterson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Trina Stanley Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Paige Anderson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Ian Hurn Forest Grove, OR 2020-12-10
Kaelene Colobella SLC, UT 2020-12-10
Chantel Trujillo US 2020-12-10
Taylor Weidner Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Ana Shaw West Jordan, UT 2020-12-10
Michele Muchmore Roy, UT 2020-12-10
Monica Florez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Theresa Johnson Spanish Fork, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Eduardo Hernandez Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Jena Trujillo Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-10
Lee Hirsch Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Sarah Walsh Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Malik Dayo Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
cassandra oquendo Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Timery Reis Layton, UT 2020-12-10
Annette Mifflin Clearfield, UT 2020-12-10
Eddy Berrest Farmington, UT 2020-12-10
Natalia Carvajal Los Angeles, CA 2020-12-10
Siera Green Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Angela Hernandez Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Laura Strickland Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Kady Newland Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Abigail Bellows Park City, UT 2020-12-10
Hunter Burningham Kaysville, UT 2020-12-10
Kimberly Garcia Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Ellen Ringer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jaime Contreras Ogden, VT 2020-12-10
Nicole Taylor Eagle Mountain, UT 2020-12-10
Nick Baxter Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Jacqueline Briggs Utah, ID 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Scott Hardman Layton, UT 2020-12-10
Marlene L. Pikyavit Kanosh, UT 2020-12-10
Devonte Powell Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Shelby Joos Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Deanna Denmead Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
sarajane fife Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Natasha Elander Salt Lake City Utah, UT 2020-12-10
isa izazaga Layton, UT 2020-12-10
Tony Noble Murray, UT 2020-12-10
Melussa Goodblanket Clinton, OK 2020-12-10
Patrick Mac Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Lea Kinikini Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Audi Madrigal Los Angeles, CA 2020-12-10
Yolanda Hampt Portland, OR 2020-12-10
Michelle Stiner Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Taliea Curtis Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Didi t Port Orchard, WA 2020-12-10
Rachael Richmond Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Rebecca Smith Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jamilyn Yazzie Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Mckenzie Banks Mapleton, UT 2020-12-10
Rachel Ferguson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Jenny Amack Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Whitney Geertsen Syracuse, UT 2020-12-10
Donna Baluchi Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Brandee Burnam SLC, UT 2020-12-10
Ally Sweeney South Jordan, UT 2020-12-10
Paulina Redd Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Zack Reiter Long Beach, CA 2020-12-10
Ruth Faulkner Boulder City, NV 2020-12-10
Anthony Snow Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Matthew Raines Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jennifer Vesnaugh Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Jacoyia Roseberry Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jazmin Perez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Robert Hobson Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-10
Estefanía Duran Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Shonelle Acosta Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Travis Bailey Alhambra, CA 2020-12-10
Aliya Elander Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Marci Zwygart Richfield, UT 2020-12-10
Lisa Chandler Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Stacey Matheson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
scott stanley midvale, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Mikayla Viny Bountiful, UT 2020-12-10
Jessica Whipple Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Kirsten Holly Jackpot, NV 2020-12-10
Ryan Parker American Fork, UT 2020-12-10
Callin Randle Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Cody Reuschel Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Celi Haslam Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
alberto rodriguez El Paso, TX 2020-12-10
Erin P Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Stephanie Bevill Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Vanessa Angulo Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Lekzi Roper Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jeanne Sasaki Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Nicole McFarlane Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Sel Leyba Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Amanda Jensen Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Teagan Stewart Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Bonina Brobeck Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Nicole Merhi Draper, UT 2020-12-10
Abigail Olson Sandy, UT 2020-12-10
Kenzi Coker Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
devin jordan West Valley City, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Gracelyn Bonham Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Josh Emery Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Emilie Reilly SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 2020-12-10
Bobbette Santiago San Bernardino, CA 2020-12-10
Natalie Hunt West Valley City, UT 2020-12-10
Hannah Stubbs Columbus, US 2020-12-10
Dusk X Wentzville, US 2020-12-10
nene newsome La Verne, US 2020-12-10
Campbell Brice Brooklyn, US 2020-12-10
Sophia Vazquez Los Angeles, US 2020-12-10
Jimena Reyes Chicago, US 2020-12-10
Makenz Smith Harvard, US 2020-12-10
Emmie Kanelos Alexandria, US 2020-12-10
Alivia Snider Lee county, US 2020-12-10
Fragile Penguin Depew, US 2020-12-10
poooop poooop West Chester, US 2020-12-10
Sam L Brooklyn, US 2020-12-10
Hyejin Yun Montrose, US 2020-12-10
Martha Castillo Gurnee, US 2020-12-10
Ashley Eversole Porterville, US 2020-12-10
Lexie Terry Greensboro, US 2020-12-10
Emma Suchsland Chillicothe, US 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
adella shin duluth, US 2020-12-10
gabby nicole Norwich, US 2020-12-10
Isabella Gray Patterson, US 2020-12-10
Matthew Mesa San Antonio, US 2020-12-10
Leanna Hostetler Cleveland, US 2020-12-10
Liza Gee Dripping Springs, US 2020-12-10
Carrie Poynton New Lenox, US 2020-12-10
Teagan Swanson La Conner, US 2020-12-10
kendall bawden Napa, US 2020-12-10
Sophie Spector Boise, US 2020-12-10
Leila Cardenas San Bernardino, US 2020-12-10
Malia Hafoka Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-10
Yasmine Horton Bessemer, US 2020-12-10
Gabriela Corral Santa Fe, US 2020-12-10
Michael Ellner Pioneer, US 2020-12-10
Jameika Glass Las Vegas, US 2020-12-10
Stephanie Revolorio Bell Gardens, US 2020-12-10
Hala Mohamed Columbus, US 2020-12-10
E J Volkyl San Francisco, US 2020-12-10
Sarah Cade Broken Arrow, US 2020-12-10
Iggy Manzanero Jersey City, US 2020-12-10
Jordan Vesely Charleston, US 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
ingrid castillo Moreno Valley, US 2020-12-10
Hannah Groves Frederick, US 2020-12-10
Christopher Stimson Akron, US 2020-12-10
Alec Molina Bridgeport, US 2020-12-10
Yusra Nouh North Hills, US 2020-12-10
Brianna Arrevillado Washington, US 2020-12-10
Nyrie Jade Mckinleyville, US 2020-12-10
Kamren Richardson Greenfield, US 2020-12-10
Dann O Port Orchard, US 2020-12-10
jada belisle Tualatin, US 2020-12-10
nzingaa jennings San Bernardino, US 2020-12-10
evelyn morales Ocean View, US 2020-12-10
Jocelyn ubillus Montclair, US 2020-12-10
Jacky Ramirez Carlsbad, US 2020-12-10
Laleah Atkinson Brandon, US 2020-12-10
nylah rushing Fontana, US 2020-12-10
Skyler Riley Antioch, US 2020-12-10
Zidhara Hall Albuquerque, US 2020-12-10
amy hernandez Brighton, US 2020-12-10
Liza Yefremova Hilton Head Island, US 2020-12-10
Natali Aparicio Brooklyn, US 2020-12-10
graylyn rhee Newton, US 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Halie Ray Cicero, US 2020-12-10
Marley Waterman Ogden, UT 2020-12-10
Zipporah Andrews Mansfield, US 2020-12-10
McKenzie Andrews Ontario, US 2020-12-10
Daniel Perez-Enriquez Pompano Beach, US 2020-12-10
Lupita Sanchez Orange Cove, US 2020-12-10
Ari Davis North Las Vegas, US 2020-12-10
Hailey Adams Detroit, US 2020-12-10
sara traverzo new york, US 2020-12-10
Aubrey Marks Pittsburgh, US 2020-12-10
sabrina ahmed Minneapolis, US 2020-12-10
jessica de la paz Houston, US 2020-12-10
Kyrah Nitz Marion, US 2020-12-10
Tanya Hernandez Watsonville, US 2020-12-10
Teresina Bradley Mclean, US 2020-12-10
ashlyn fowler Chesapeake, US 2020-12-10
Ziesha Harris Bronx, US 2020-12-10
Kiyana Hazel Meridian idaho, US 2020-12-10
katelyn rivera Wyoming, US 2020-12-10
Skylar Chirko Seattle, US 2020-12-10
Yarianys Cuevas Kissimmee, US 2020-12-10
aidab e no, US 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Brianna Bella Winter Garden, US 2020-12-10
Robert N Walker West Windsor, US 2020-12-10
Jenny Padilla Bakersfield, US 2020-12-10
sarah kalemba New Port Richey, US 2020-12-10
Ashley Hernandez San Frenando, US 2020-12-10
Ena cruz Richmond, US 2020-12-10
Natasha Daigle Dracut, US 2020-12-10
pluto im real yes yes Phoenix, US 2020-12-10
Alyvia Cornett Davison, US 2020-12-10
Elly Obondo Cleveland, US 2020-12-10
Sara Cattran Puyallup, US 2020-12-10
Brooklyn Price Meridian, US 2020-12-10
Jasonie Hickman Summerville, US 2020-12-10
Justin Abdalla Antioch, US 2020-12-10
Maya Robinson NY, US 2020-12-10
Josephine Duran Denver, US 2020-12-10
maddie baldon Upland, US 2020-12-10
Natalie Hernandez Lockeford, US 2020-12-10
mom chan Berkeley, US 2020-12-10
Alli Garcia Tracy, US 2020-12-10
Machais Pagán worcester, US 2020-12-10
Izzy Z Glastonbury, US 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Tracie Lozano Fremont, US 2020-12-10
Jonathan Mensah College Park, US 2020-12-10
Elaine Lemae Minneapolis, US 2020-12-10
Rosa Garcia Santa Ana, US 2020-12-10
Fatima Mendoza Fremont, US 2020-12-10
Adrian Hughes Maryland Heights, US 2020-12-10
Bella sanders Lincolnton, US 2020-12-10
Ariana Jackson Cincinnati, US 2020-12-10
Madeline Crowder Antioch, US 2020-12-10
Kyla Sedgwick New Richmond, US 2020-12-10
Robert Ortiz San Francisco, US 2020-12-10
Kayleigh Torres Pittsburgh, US 2020-12-10
Emily Weaver San Francisco, US 2020-12-10
Danielle Machuca Rosamond, US 2020-12-10
Breanna Semenuk Woodbridge, US 2020-12-10
m.i.s.f.i.tt jitt tampa, US 2020-12-10
Brenda Gomez Brooklyn, US 2020-12-10
Amber Alejos Moreno Valley, US 2020-12-10
Kalo Palei WEST VALLEY CITY, UT 2020-12-10
Sofie Swartling Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Brenden Conroy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Erica Shaw Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Jamie Duckworth Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Kylie Vivenzio Park City, UT 2020-12-10
Aliss Niles Olympia, WA 2020-12-10
Joseph Brandin Springville, UT 2020-12-10
Julie Shaw Herriman, UT 2020-12-10
Chris Moore Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Savannah Smith Utah 2020-12-10
David Hawkins Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-10
Hurija Mustafic West Valley City, UT 2020-12-10
Ben Christensen Provo, UT 2020-12-10
Misti Okimoto Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Ivy Neiswanger Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Ermina Mustafic West Valley City, UT 2020-12-10
Brendan O'Leary Park City, UT 2020-12-10
Tea Savea Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Kevin Kruse Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Puanani Delling Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
TEVITA PUPUA SALT LAKE CITY, UT 2020-12-10
Kylee covington Pleasant Grove, UT 2020-12-10
Pamela Balluck Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Jerek Clark Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Adam Rudy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-10
Name Location Date
Jose Morales Layton, UT 2020-12-11
Natalie Talamante Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Jillian DiNucci Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Justin Rodriguez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Victoria Wolfe Tiverton, RI 2020-12-11
Jenny Gubler Orem, UT 2020-12-11
Marco Say Seattle, WA 2020-12-11
Piper Salazar Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Jae Weit Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Matthew Tripp Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Abraham Alonso Honeyville, UT 2020-12-11
sarah nass Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Mel Moeinvaziri Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Luis Cotton Clearfield, UT 2020-12-11
Victoria Lopez West Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Vickie Rodríguez West Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Demia Vaenuku Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
jayna balzer Seattle, WA 2020-12-11
Abdi Hussein Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Tyson Whitney Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Michelle Chavez Glendale, UT 2020-12-11
Jessica Andrews Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Name Location Date
Connor Nipper Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Kate Kelly Golden, CO 2020-12-11
Zoe Reid West Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Elizabeth Gutierrez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Brook Neilson Chicago, IL 2020-12-11
Ramiz Mustafic Minneapolis, MN 2020-12-11
Terrance Mannery West Valley City, UT 2020-12-11
Courtney Sondrol Vandalia, OH 2020-12-11
Amona Faatau Santa Clara, CA 2020-12-11
Christina Ordonez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Sally Caldora Bountiful, UT 2020-12-11
Holly Burrows West Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Mila Sherman Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Jessie Maloney Burlington, NJ 2020-12-11
Kyle Murray Taylorsville, UT 2020-12-11
Russ Wood Chico, CA 2020-12-11
cade beck Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
juliejulie castellanos Merced, CA 2020-12-11
Danielle Fuentes Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-11
Shulamit Baram-guzman Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Jennifer Andrus Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Haley Sorenson Midvale, UT 2020-12-11
Name Location Date
Mike Macart West Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Adrianna stanley Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Morgan Law Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Colin Young Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Chantelle Kiessner Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Lydia Hartman Evanston, IL 2020-12-11
Brooklyn Wood Draper, UT 2020-12-11
Cj Bovee Ogden, UT 2020-12-11
Tricia Cacace Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Zachary Campbell Ogden, UT 2020-12-11
Megan Chandramouli North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-11
Jessica Tisdale Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Candice Pugh Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Briahna Sprinkle Slc, UT 2020-12-11
Chloe Simpson Layton, UT 2020-12-11
Amber Rocque US 2020-12-11
Katherine Baeza Saratoga Springs, UT 2020-12-11
Michael Larson Provo, UT 2020-12-11
Kristie Rogers Ogden, UT 2020-12-11
Garrett Taylor Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Hadiel Mohamed Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Steve Turnbull Minneapolis, MN 2020-12-11
Name Location Date
Manny Monroy Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Tom Southerton Lowell, MA 2020-12-11
Jennifer Emerson Boise, ID 2020-12-11
Greg Woodhead Boise, ID 2020-12-11
Marisa Massery Pittsfield, MA 2020-12-11
Har Poulson Ogden, UT 2020-12-11
Phoebe Heins South Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Davin Trujillo Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Shyanne Miller Wilmington, DE 2020-12-11
Frances Dingivan Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Shayla Ocegueda Ogden, UT 2020-12-11
Dean Wathen South Jordan, UT 2020-12-11
Mikayla Grubbs No, UT 2020-12-11
Chloe' Cox Orem, UT 2020-12-11
Tilesa Fotu Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-11
Michelle Ricciardi Holladay, UT 2020-12-11
jeremy eaton Taylorsville, UT 2020-12-11
Heather Atwood West Valley City, UT 2020-12-11
Yasamin Marashi San Francisco, CA 2020-12-11
Sabrina Cluff Lehi, UT 2020-12-12
Lukas Rainer West Jordan, UT 2020-12-12
Shawn Wilson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Name Location Date
Emma Miller Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Morgan Medina Ogden, UT 2020-12-12
Christy Kobe Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Olivia Cree Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Reed Palmer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Luis Sanchez Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Amy DeLong Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Chloe Kinney West Valley City, UT 2020-12-12
Julie Cordell-Seamons Eagle Mountain, UT 2020-12-12
Jorge Rojas Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Claire Garff Tooele, UT 2020-12-12
Devin Christensen Erda, UT 2020-12-12
Evie Rivas Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Paloma Cervantes Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-12
Brintha Knowlton West Valley City, UT 2020-12-13
Kristen Baldwin Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-13
Tiffany Mankins Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-13
Aaron Tapp Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-13
Antoinette Chynoweth Cedar City, UT 2020-12-13
Kieshia Reeves US 2020-12-13
Amber Western West Valley City, UT 2020-12-13
Zora Shaw West Jordan, UT 2020-12-13
Name Location Date
Darwin Argueta Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-13
Ashlyn jones Salt lake city, UT 2020-12-13
Justin Harnish Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-13
Aspen Russell Draper, UT 2020-12-13
Brooks Hale Layton, UT 2020-12-13
Linnaea Mendoza Sandy, UT 2020-12-14
Marisela Mendoza Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-14
John Miller West Jordan, UT 2020-12-14
Jermaine Gardner Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-14
Becka Florczyk Teaneck, US 2020-12-14
Patrick Leyerle Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Anna McNamer Cottonwood Heights, UT 2020-12-15
Shantel Reitz Riverton, UT 2020-12-15
Sydney Nettesheim Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Alexis Bauer Roy, UT 2020-12-15
Larissa Andersen Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Shannon Clark Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Tish Hicks Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Sam Huntington Sandy, UT 2020-12-15
Caroline Phinney Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Carly Huchendorf Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Matthew Rosu West Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
Katie Sales Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Whitney Weinberg Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
ERICA BINDAS Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Holly Pierce Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Isaac Hawker Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Lex scott Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kirsten Capunay Sandy, UT 2020-12-15
Amber McFee Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Eric Herschthal Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Miranda Organ Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Rachel McKeen Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Ashley Cruz Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Lori Whittam Draper, UT 2020-12-15
Carey Dufner Logan, UT 2020-12-15
Genevieve Healey Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Tiffany Shults Layton, UT 2020-12-15
Callie Chandler Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
ALICE PETERSEN-GRIMES salt lake city, UT 2020-12-15
Melanie Williams South Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Chelsea Solorzano Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Taylor Hoyt Layton, UT 2020-12-15
Rachel Malaga Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
keith weimer Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Patrick Wentworth Pittsburgh, PA 2020-12-15
Jennie Bingham Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Shyanne Cheng Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Michelle Hayes Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Brenda Kidman Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Terri Marshall Sandy, UT 2020-12-15
Leota Pearson Herriman, UT 2020-12-15
Alex Amaya Phoenix, US 2020-12-15
Kristin Jackson Ogden, US 2020-12-15
Jasper Gillespie Austin, US 2020-12-15
Dr Phils Baby momma Sterling, US 2020-12-15
No Name Park City, US 2020-12-15
Jaden Tagle Placentia, US 2020-12-15
Shannon DeSalvo Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Sparrow Moon Dallas, US 2020-12-15
Yun Bun Red Deer, US 2020-12-15
michael wright Santa Ana, US 2020-12-15
Maya Theiss East Lyme, US 2020-12-15
ye boi eaeae Wichita, US 2020-12-15
Nova Cooper East Moline, US 2020-12-15
Ryan Madden Claymont, US 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
Nicole Vasile Deerfield, US 2020-12-15
Kaylee Collins Ward, US 2020-12-15
Ruby Shipp Nashville, US 2020-12-15
Kerri Moynihan East Falmouth, US 2020-12-15
Kiara Valdez Montebello, US 2020-12-15
Kathryn Harstad Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Jeffrey Moreno Centereach, US 2020-12-15
Kaitlyn M Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Cleo Ricks Bristol, US 2020-12-15
Candace Rich Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-15
Monica Heaton Topeka, US 2020-12-15
Amy Pickettt Saint Paul, MN 2020-12-15
Taylor Colton South Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Jamie Joanou Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Jenessa Halliday SLC, UT 2020-12-15
Rockkeem Hoskins Magna, UT 2020-12-15
Maura Cheney Centerville, UT 2020-12-15
Ann Scarborough Sandy, UT 2020-12-15
Laurie Hofmann Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Melissa Acker Syracuse, UT 2020-12-15
Stacey Van Dahm Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Keith Embrey Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
Tracie Darcey Kaysville, UT 2020-12-15
Kylee McCluskey South Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Jaime Ortega Midvale, UT 2020-12-15
Michelle Damian Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Ashley Strong Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kev Nemelka Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kelly Wallace Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Lori Bunnell West Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Stacy Wilk Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Tanika Larsen Pleasant Grove, UT 2020-12-15
ZOEY BRIDGES Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Shawn Gillard Milford, UT 2020-12-15
Kathleen Koprowski Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
LaShawn Jennings Provo, UT 2020-12-15
Jackson Keller Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Jan Chamberlin American Fork, UT 2020-12-15
Alison Bayles Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kevin Koons Ogden, UT 2020-12-15
Erin Castro Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Megan Hurster Park City, UT 2020-12-15
Deborah Walton Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kay Corley West Jordan, UT 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
Tia Haycock Spanish Fork, UT 2020-12-15
Laura Rencher Riverton, UT 2020-12-15
Kayla Harris Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Joanne Kiehn Heber City, UT 2020-12-15
Cory Givens Kent, US 2020-12-15
Brianna (Bee) Brisk Milwaukee, US 2020-12-15
Natalie Harrocks Concord, US 2020-12-15
Jayoni Harper Cleveland, US 2020-12-15
taylor murante Bethlehem, US 2020-12-15
Devon Covey Oldsmar, US 2020-12-15
John Stofko Allentown, US 2020-12-15
madi parkinson Benton City, US 2020-12-15
hannah kuehn Milwaukee, US 2020-12-15
Taylor Edwards Shoreview, US 2020-12-15
ella mccarthy Richmond, US 2020-12-15
Mariana Murillo Edgewood, US 2020-12-15
Marie Zaccaria Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Jackeb-Eligah Milan Oberlin, US 2020-12-15
Zephaniah Henson Mount Carmel, US 2020-12-15
Jessa Hurty Midvale, UT 2020-12-15
Kiylee Reed Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Sheylyn Ivester Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Name Location Date
Allison Kokonas Hurricane, UT 2020-12-15
T Andrew Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Emily Edmonston Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Erica Wood Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Hailey Anderson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Cheryl Altman Sandy, UT 2020-12-15
Kevin steele Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Blake Barlow Broomfield, CO 2020-12-15
Emma Toyn Riverton, UT 2020-12-15
Carina Whiteside Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Priscilla Meleisea Midvale, UT 2020-12-15
Dulsi Covington Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Kimilyn Poulson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-15
Aubree Riggsby West Jordan, UT 2020-12-16
Robbin Daffin Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Susanna Buss Ogden, UT 2020-12-16
Joelle Roberts West Jordan, UT 2020-12-16
Angie Keeton North Salt Lake, UT 2020-12-16
Bernadette Caldwell Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Tamara Fox Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Holly Ancell Provo, UT 2020-12-16
Val Murdock Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Name Location Date
Levy Woodruff Sandy, UT 2020-12-16
Carrie Reilly Salt lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Kandy R Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Kara Cope Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Bret Webster Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Derek Gersdorf Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
William Donohue Flowery Branch, GA 2020-12-16
Paul Wagner Capitola, CA 2020-12-16
Carol foster Bingham, UK 2020-12-16
Sunny Nelson West Jordan, UT 2020-12-16
Matt Park Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Jennifer Jackson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
ROBERT DOXEY Ogden, UT 2020-12-16
Courtney Harris Roy, UT 2020-12-16
Melissa Van Putten South Jordan, UT 2020-12-16
Drew Plavchak Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
Jackie Assaad Slc, UT 2020-12-16
Stephanie Heard Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-16
maralee grimes salt lake city, UT 2020-12-16
LaDawn Allem Sandy, UT 2020-12-16
Sarah Schlaefke Milwaukee, WI 2020-12-16
Ashley Blake Clearfield, UT 2020-12-17
Name Location Date
Matthew Klein US 2020-12-17
Alicia Fisher Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-17
Tia Mitsinikos Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-17
SARAH COLLETT Springville, UT 2020-12-17
Anna Steffensmeier Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-17
Margaret Kieweg Portland, OR 2020-12-18
Jessica Whitley Brigham City, UT 2020-12-18
Amber Whitaker West Valley City, UT 2020-12-20
Aimee Johnson West valley, UT 2020-12-20
esperanza chavez Silverton, OR 2020-12-20
Ashley Hall Provo, UT 2020-12-21
Janet Williams Park City, UT 2020-12-21
Juanita Florez Ogden, UT 2020-12-21
Carina Munoz Ogden, UT 2020-12-22
Lauren Kink Herrin, IL 2020-12-22
Vivian Wakonabo Cloquet, US 2020-12-22
Melanie Hernandez La Habra, US 2020-12-22
Jazlyn Mendez Wenatchee, US 2020-12-22
Bailey Whittaker Charles Town, US 2020-12-22
Raquel E Las Vegas, US 2020-12-22
Alli Flores Phoenix, US 2020-12-22
Beah It Rochester, US 2020-12-22
Name Location Date
Owen Kaayou Germantown, US 2020-12-22
Katelynne Crider Santa Rosa Beach, US 2020-12-22
Savannah Plante West Valley City, US 2020-12-22
sai mccummiez Chicago, US 2020-12-22
manileen chan Elk Grove, US 2020-12-22
Umar Tepancochqui Denver, US 2020-12-22
Linda Torres Porterville, US 2020-12-22
Kaniyah Gordon Chicago, US 2020-12-22
Kylee Eklund Elko, US 2020-12-22
Daniel Robinson Tampa, US 2020-12-22
Kara Vazquez Salt Lake City, US 2020-12-22
Izzy Faith Lewisport, US 2020-12-22
John Paul Asheville, US 2020-12-22
Katherine Cutie Las Vegas, US 2020-12-22
Lincoln Darlyn Twin Falls, US 2020-12-22
Alexa Galindo Las Cruces, US 2020-12-22
Hailey Gilley Dallas, US 2020-12-22
Alexis Wilson Havertown, US 2020-12-22
Chase Williams Simpsonville, US 2020-12-22
Mason Laos Castle Rock, US 2020-12-22
bunni .Duluth, US 2020-12-22
Hossein Saeedi Clifton, US 2020-12-22
Name Location Date
Carla Alhallak El Segundo, US 2020-12-22
Siddharth Katta College Station, US 2020-12-22
Liz Diaz North Augusta, US 2020-12-22
momena shah Sugar Land, US 2020-12-22
Destiny Harland Rice Lake, US 2020-12-22
Maggie Utgoff Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-22
Heidi Lloyd South Jordan, UT 2020-12-27
JoAnne Johanson Salt Lake City, UT 2020-12-29
Jennifer Segundo Los Angeles, CA 2020-12-30
Dawn-Marie Tabery Salt Lake City, UT 2021-01-03
Carlos Alarco Orem, UT 2021-01-03
Alma Bustinza Salt Lake City, UT 2021-01-03
Caitlin LaVange Pleasant Grove, UT 2021-01-03
Abulaila Ibn-deluz Hamden, US 2021-01-03
Kim Gonzalez Mesa, US 2021-01-03
Stephanie Dominguez Orange, US 2021-01-03
Alekzander Hayes Pottstown, US 2021-01-03
Simone Baham Little Elm, US 2021-01-03
Nicole Clark Stow, US 2021-01-03
Aline Alino Falls Church, US 2021-01-03
B F Bridgeport, US 2021-01-03
Skyy Hughes San Francisco, US 2021-01-03
Name Location Date
Emily Huber Seymour, US 2021-01-03
abby bates Atascadero, US 2021-01-03
Gracen Mae Dandridge, US 2021-01-03
Solomon Byrd Charlotte, US 2021-01-03
Monserrat Mendoza Chicago, US 2021-01-03
Justin Kaufman Fort Wayne, US 2021-01-03
Natalia Padilla Houston, US 2021-01-03
Madison Hayes Ashkum, US 2021-01-03
Jose Santiago Salt Lake City, UT 2021-01-03
Vanessa Bocanegra Lehi, UT 2021-01-04
Melanie Bocanegra Salt Lake City, UT 2021-01-04
Azalia Bocanegra Saratoga Springs, UT 2021-01-05
Pavin Argyle Azusa, CA 2021-01-05
Liz Lopez Las Vegas, NV 2021-01-05
Police Budget Comments 12.30.2020-01.08.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment
1/5/2021 11:08 Polly Butler Jette
Subject: (EXTERNAL) Dear Ana. My name is Polly Butler Jette and I live at
in SLC. I have lived in my home for 29 years and have NEVER
experienced the fear and frustration I now feel living in the liberty park area. I
am fed up with the crime in my area and have decided to start a grass roots
movement to address and replace every member of the city council and any
other public servant that has put "road blocks" in place to solve the huge
problem we now have. We have experienced a massive increase in criminal
activity on my street and on my own property in the past few months and
especially the past few weeks. Last night for the fifth time in two weeks we
encountered a stranger on our property trying to break into our cars and our
home. We are under siege in the Liberty park area! For years this area has
been improving and in a few short months it's crime has gotten worst then it's
ever been, EVER!!! DO SOMETHING! The DA doesn't prosecute anyone that
isn't charged with a federal crime so these "petty" criminals just get bolder
and the crimes just keep getting worse. There was a car jacking three blocks
from our home last night. *Continued 1/2*
3:56 PM 1/8/2021 Page 1
Police Budget Comments 12.30.2020-01.08.2021
Date/Time Opened Contact Name Comment
Polly Butler Jette
* Continued 2/2 * Im asking you to support the hiring of more police and
TRAIN THEM. THIS WILL IN TURN support your citizens!! We need solutions
and we need it now! This administration is failing its community and have
handled the homeless situation, the riots, and worse of all the lack of support
for our police department in a deplorable manner. 80 officers have left the SLC
department since May. They can go to a dozen other cities, make more money
and not be put on such dangerous circumstances. WE NEED THESE OFFICERS!!
TRAIN THEM, SUPPORT THEM, HIRE MORE OF THEM, BEFORE WE BECOME AN
EVEN MORE DANGEROUS CITY!! It is out of control. While you people put a
"hiring freeze" on new officers you also piss money away on total pork
projects while we are left to defend ourselves against the biggest crime wave
this city has ever seen. What the hell is going on???? Everyone I've talked to is
fed up. I'm afraid to walk out my own back door because of who may be out
there. I'M FED UP AND IM SCARED!! YOU AND THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS
ARE NOT DOING ENOUGH TO CHANGE THE SITUATION.
3:56 PM 1/8/2021 Page 2