The URL can be used to link to this page

04/17/1989 - Minutes PI Minutes: Committee of the Whole Monday, April 17, 1989 5:00 - 7:30 P.M. City Council Conference Room 324 South State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 In Attendance: Tom Godfrey, W.M. "Willie" Stoler, Florence Bittner, Wayne Horrocks, Alan Hardman, Sydney Fonnesbeck, Roselyn Kirk, Lee King, Cam Caldwell, James Hall, Larry Thorum, Joe Anderson, Scott Bond, Jim Paulford, Jim Lewis, Brad Stewart, George Jorgensen, Wendell Evensen, Linda Hamilton, Press Joe Anderson, Director of Public Works, said that the presentation concerning the Refuse Collection Enterprise Fund budget would be given by Jim Paulford, Office Coordinator for Streets and Sanitation. Mr. Paulford reviewed the handout (attachment #1 ) which outlines background information, service and staffing levels, revenues and major policy issues. He said that he would briefly review the material and then answers questions from the Council. Mr. Paulford said that in 1972 there were 58 full-time garbage collectors, 2 seasonal workers and 2 supervisors handling the trash pick-up. He said that with the full implementation of the automated system, the program now had 16 operators, 1 supervisor, and one employee to maintain and replace the cans. He said that during the winter there were 8 routes collected with an average of 1100 cans per route. He said that during the summer there were 10 routes with a 900 can average, but that the routes also covered the golf courses, administrative services and some City buildings. Mr. Paulford said that the Fund was not building an account to replace the current vehicles and that plans needed to be made to pay for the replacement equipment. Mr. Cam Caldwell, Council Staff Budget Analyst, reviewed his staff report on the proposed Refuse Collection budget (attachment #2) . He said that he had spoken with the vendor who supplies the collection equipment and that they were impressed with the number of cans that the drivers are picking up each day. He said that the high maintenance costs were due to the workloads put on the trucks. He said that the national average for can pickup was 500-600 per day, according to the vendors, and that Salt Lake operators were picking up between 900 and 1100 per day. He said that with this high rate of use, changing the payback plan from 5 years to 7 years made him uncomfortable. He said that the change would under-represent the actual cost of the program. Mr. Caldwell said that he recommended that the Council ask the Administration to develop a funding plan to cover the full cost of the program since there was no money left from the Municipal Building Authority bond, or in capitalized interest. Mr. Caldwell said that the increase in data processing costs were due to an increased use of the computer, mainly in billing. He said that having Public Utilities absorb the Garbage Fund 's IMS costs would cut into the Public Utilities Capital Improvement fund. Councilmember Sydney Fonnesbeck asked if the Neighborhood Cleanup costs were included in recommendation number one. Mr. Anderson said that a $2 increase in the monthly fee would cover the cost of the neighborhood cleanup and the current subsidy. Councilmember Alan Hardman asked if the fleet maintenance saving at the expense of the life of the truck was a good trade-off. Mr. Caldwell said that the maintenance costs are higher per truck, but still cheaper than buying more vehicles. He said that the trucks should be able to pick up 1 .6 million pounds in the trucks lifetime, and that the Public Works was working with the truck vendor to reduce maintenance costs. Councilmember Tom Godfrey asked where the savings came from by going to the automated system. Mr. Anderson said that the majority of the savings came through lower insurance and workers compensation costs. Mr. Anderson said that they thought the warranty covered everything during the first year but that it did not . Jim Paulford said that they didn't take full advantage of the warranty because City crews did some of the repairs themselves to keep the trucks on the streets. He said that the warranty stipulated having the vendors do all of the repairs which would sometimes take too long. Mr. Anderson said that the vendor didn't guarantee repair schedules, and so the City crews could save time and some costs by doing repairs in house. Mr. Caldwell said that TESCO, the vendor for the loaders, is looking at the maintenance cost to see why they are so high. Mr. Godfrey asked if the City and County agreed on the current rates for dumping fees. Mr. Anderson said that the City and County donated land for the landfill and have been paid back through a rebate on dumping fees. He said that the rebate has run out and that they didn't want to raise the fees because more may people dump illegally to avoid the higher fee. Mr. Godfrey asked if the current fee of $6 a ton was a good price. Mr. Anderson said that it was the lowest fee in the region. Councilmember Florence Bittner asked about the tonnage levels. Mr. Anderson said that the tonnage for the Neighborhood Cleanup was going down, but that the daily pickup tonnage was going up as people fill the larger cans each week. Mr. Hardman asked why the subsidy figures from last year have changed in the current budget. Mr. Caldwell said that the 1988/89 subsidy included bond proceeds and capitalized interest . Mr. Hardman asked for a breakdown of the costs and asked if the Garbage Fund paid interest to the City on the subsidy money. Mr. Anderson said that the fund did not pay interest on the subsidy money. Mr. Paulford said that if the Garbage Fund has a cash surplus, interest is earned on that money as income. If the Fund borrows from the garbage fund, above the subsidy rate, interest is paid on that money. Mr. Hardman asked if those interest payments would be an ongoing cost. Mr. Paulford said that they would be until the Fund was self sufficient. Council Chair W.M. "Willie" Stoler asked if the Council could support the staff recommendations. Concerning recommendation #1 , Mr. Fonnesbeck asked if the City didn't already have a plan. She said that the Council shouldn't have them develop a plan if the Council wasn't ready to support it . Mr. Caldwell said that the current plan didn't figure in vehicle replacement costs. Mr. Hardman asked what the current rate of subsidy was. Mr. Paulford said that it was a 25% subsidy. Mr. Hardman said that it was either continue the subsidy or raise the collection fees. Mr. Stoler asked if depreciation wasn't in the funding plan, if the City would have to bond again to replace the trucks. Mr. Paulford said that they City could bond or pay for the trucks out of the general fund. Mr. Caldwell said that the 7 year payback schedule as proposed raised the possibility of paying for new trucks before the old ones are paid for. Concerning recommendation #3, Mr. Lee King said that there was some disagreement over Public Utilities absorbing the Garbage Fund's data processing costs. Mr. King said that Public Utilities was proposing a water rate increase to pay for capital improvements and that absorbing the Garbage Fund's data processing costs would decrease the capitally improvement budget. He suggested tabling the motion until after the discussion of the Public Utilities budget. The Council supported recommendations #1 and #2 and agreed to table #3 for later discussion. Mr. LeRoy Hooton, Director of Public Utilities, and Jim Lewis, Chief Finance and Accounting Officer, presented the proposed Public Utilities budget for 1989/90. Mr. Hooton said that the Public Utilities department had met every federal standard for water quality and waste disposal. He said that with the thousands of quality test conducted each year, Salt Lake City has a perfect record. He said that the quality standards are getting more stringent and that Salt Lake needs to keep improving its system to keep up the quality. Mr. Hooton said that the quality of the water system comprises 40% of the ratings used to establish fire insurance rates for a city. Mr. Jim Lewis reviewed the Public Utilities budget highlights on pages 2-3 of their written statement (attachment #3) . He said that the Department was proposing a 10% increase in water rates and a 6% decrease in sewer rates (page 4) . Ms. Fonnesbeck asked if the rate change would effect the minimum rates. Mr. Lewis said that it would increase the base rate by one dollar per month and the base use rate by $.04 per hundred cubic feet. Mr. Lewis reviewed the requested personnel changes (page 5) and the staffing levels (page 6) He said that costs have increased, mainly in fleet and data processing, and that water purchases have also increased (page 10). He said that the spreadsheets on page 14 and 15 outlined the cost breakdowns by type code. Mr. Lewis said that the 10% increase would generate $2 million per year for capital improvements. He said that the capital improvements paid for by the bond have all been completed and that the new improvements would involve line replacements. Ms. Bittner asked what the bond debt and payback schedule was. Mr. Lewis said that the total bond was $32 million, 27 for water and 5 million for sewer, and that it would be paid of in 2005. He said that a bond spreadsheet was on page 13. Ms. Bittner asked what would happen with just a 6% increase in water rates. Mr. Lewis said that it would generate $700,000 and would allow the City to bond for $10 million on a 30 year payback schedule. Mr. Hooton said that the City was faced with a huge task in replacing its water mains. He said that the system was old and was breaking down. He said that costs for flooding, street damage and associated problems would increase if the system was not replaced. Mr. George Jorgensen, Chief Engineer, reviewed the list of proposed projects to be paid for by the rate increase (attachment #4) . He said that the City is still using some pipe laid down in 1855 and that the 2.6% of the system slated for replacement does not include pumps, wells or anything other than pipe. Mr. Hooton said that a city should replace 2% of its water system every year. The proposed plan replaces 2% over a ten year period. Councilmember Bittner asked how the City got so far behind in its capital improvements in the water system. Mr. Hooton said that the City has underfunded the program for years and that since the City started bonding for improvements the system has gotten better. Ms. Bittner asked how much money would be needed for an ideal replacement program. Mr. Hooton said that they were asking for $2 million but needed $10 million. He said that if Sandy City came into the Salt Lake system, $2.5 million would be available for the northwest quadrant, to prepare it for anticipated growth. Mr. Stoler said that he was concerned that the City was trying to build a new system while fixing the old system. Mr. Hooton said that Salt Lake was currently paying on both ends and that investment in the new system saves money in the long run. He said that the bond paid for major projects but that the rest of the system is 12 years older and new projects have come to the top of the priority list. Ms. Bittner asked if the rate increase would give the department an annual pot of money to use for improvements. Mr. Hooton said that as the money is spent, and the system improved, the repair costs should go down. Mr. Lewis reviewed the charts on pages 17 and 18 showing the age of the system, saying that different components of the system need to be replaced at different intervals. He said that their 5 year work plan was outlined on pages 24-26. Mr. Jim Lewis reviewed the Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund Budget and the proposed sewer rate decrease (page 27-29) . He said that the capital improvements in the sewer system were still strong due to the recent bonding program but that the City should look at refinancing some of the debt down the line. He said that the City was installing a new filtering system which would improve the quality of the water. Ms. Bittner asked what it would take to keep the water fund solvent and its capital improvements on schedule. Mr. Lewis said that it would take $10 million dollars. Mr. Hooton said that there had been no rate increase because the growth in the system paid for the improvements. He said that if rates go too high, people will stop using they system and revenues will decrease. Ms. Bittner said that she wanted to get the system on a funding program that would allow the system to be replaced in a timely manner and put the program on a sound financial footing. She asked when the Central Utah Project (CUP) water would be available and suggested that when the County joins that system and adjusts its water rates, that the City adjust its rate at the same time. Mr. Hooton said that the CUP project should be on line in 1995 and that investing in an appropriate replacement schedule was more cost efficient in the long run and was better able to accommodate growth. Mr. Lewis reviewed the details of the rate changes outlined on page 46-47. He said that the chart on page 47 outlined the effects that the change would have on various customer groups. Ms. Bittner asked if there was any way to increase the rates without doing it across the board, saying that she was worried about the impact on the small and low income customer. Mr. Hooton said that the rates had to be justifiable and that they could not discriminate. Mr. Lewis reviewed the charts on pages 48-49 which compared water rates between various cities in the west, within the Salt Lake valley and with the consumer price index. Mr. Lewis said that the current budget proposal did not include merit increases for employees and that if the salary increases were approved the money would come out of the capital improvement budget. Mr. Lee King reviewed his staff report and recommendations on the Water and Sewer Utility funds (attachment #5). He said that there would have to be a public hearing held on the rate changes, which could be held in conjunction with the budget hearing. Mr. Hardman asked what resources were available to the two funds. Mr. Lewis reviewed the budget charts on pages 8 (water fund) and 27 (sewer fund) and the cash flow charts on pages 51 and 52, for water and sewer respectively. A straw poll was taken on recommendation #1 , rate changes, the results were as follows: Florence Bittner - No Wayne Horrocks - Yes Sydney Fonnesbeck - Yes Alan Hardman - Abstained Tom Godfrey - Yes Roselyn Kirk - Yes W.M. "Willie" Stoler - Yes No Action was taken on recommendation #2. je A( /%7 Pr �_ W. M. "Willie" Stol-r, Chair ATTEST: City -co • J ( ITY(-C,�,4R °',AIL N OFFICE ;C>F:-THE CITY;COUNCIL SUITE 300, CITY HALL 324'SO UTH STATE STREET' ", SALT_LAKE-CA-T-Y,,UTAH 841`4_L Posted: April 14, 1989 SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. DATE: MAY, APRIL 17, 1989 TIME: 5:00 p.m. PLACE: City Council Conference Room • Suite 300, City Hall 324 South State Street AGENDA The City Council will discuss the proposed Fiscal Year 1989/90 Public Utilities Department budgets. Dinner. The City Council will discuss the proposed Fiscal Year 1989/90 Garbage Fund budget. cc: Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Mike Zuhl, Emilie Charles, Roger Cutler, - Kathie Marshall, Department Heads, Press REFUSE COLLECTION PRESENTATION 111111111 SECTION I - Background Information The automated refuse collection program became fully automated in July of 1988. At this time the collection program was reduced from 17 routes to 12. Individual homes collected went from 600 to 800 per day. In September of 1988 the Sanitation Section was able to increase it's cost effectiveness by operating on 10 hour shifts, 5 days a week. This change reduced the routes from 12 'to 10 and the daily home count went to 960 homes. The Sanitation Section also collects refuse from the golf courses, Parks, Public Utilities and Administrative Services. In March, 1989 the city ran out of landfill rebate bringing our tipping fees cost from $3.00 to $6.00 per ton. The Sanitation Section has shown a steady increase in tonnage. Current records indicate there will be approximately a 20% increase in tonnage collection this next year (47,000 tb 57,000 tons) . In reviewing mechanized refuse collection systems throughout the Wasatch Front and elsewhere we continue to enjoy one of the most cost effective and efficient operations in the country. SECTION II - Service Level No change in level of service • SECTION III - Staffing Current Staffing: 1) personnel: 16 refuse collectors, 1 container maintenance, 1 supervisor. 2) Equipment: 14 automated refuse vehicles, 1 semi-automated refuse truck, 1 container maintenance vehicle. No proposed changes. SCION IV - New Revenues • • Small growth in extra can revenue SnuT1ON V - Major Policy Issues • The Sanitation Fund is not self supporting and will continue to need a general fund subsidy. The garbage fee is a cost borne by city residents and the General Fund considers the residents' ability to pay. The current practice is to keep •the fee low through the General Fund subsidy. Low income residents continue to receive assistance through the County Abatement Program. The Sanitation Fund must continue to build a reserve fund for vehicle and can replacmement. Although we do not anticipate any replacement expenditures in the upcoming fiscal year we will begin replacing vehicles and cans in fiscal years 1993, 1994 and 1995. SECTION VI - Explanation of Other Charges & Services 2545 02 Lease amortization $785,000.00 This is the fund's portion of the bond repayment. 2547 Interest expense $20,000.00 Interest charged by General Fund to Sanitation Fund to use General Fund money. 2549 Risk Management Premium $8,473.00 2549 01 Worker Compensation Premium $8,700.00 2540 02 Unemployment Compensation $1,000.00 Premium 2565 Administrative Fees $127,255.00 a. $60,000.00 to Finance Department for document and report processing. b. $67,255.00 to Street Maintenance Division for management, customer service, document processing and building rental. SECTION VII - Explanation of Travel and Training Expenditures No amounts budgeted REFUSE COLLECTION FACT SHEET 1. Number of Units of Serviced a. single 35,898 b. duplex 3,660 c. triplex 440 d. fourplex 3 e. extra cans 2,907 2. Projected Revenue a. revenue 1. residential 2,208,168 2. parks 27,168 3. administrative services 4,920 4. public utilities 7,320 5. other 960 Total Projected 2,248,536 • b. less deductions 1. abatements -1 (1,291) 33,128 2. abatements 2 (54) 2,496 3. zero bills a. single units (691) 33,168 b. duplex (100) 4,800 c. triplex (17) 816 d. extra cans (69) 3,312 . e. uncollectables -4,757 Total Deductions 80,477 Total Net Revenue 2,168,059 3. Annual Budget 2,723,974 4. Cost Breakdown Information a. average cost per can (44,528 units) 4.78 b. average cost per unit 5.10 c. landfill tipping fee 6.00 d. expected tons to collect 57,000 tons e. trucks assigned 14 f. personnel assigned 18 LANDFILL TONNAGES BY FISCAL YEAR 85/86 JULY 1985 4214 AUGUST 1985 4338 SEPTEMBER 1985 4002 OCTOBER 1985 4402 NOVEMBER 1985 3292 DECEMBER 1985 3046 JANUARY 1986 3070 FEBRUARY 1986 2946 MARCH 1986 3552 APRIL 1986 4368 MAY 1986 4781 JUNE 1986 4623 85/86 TOTAL 46634 3886 MONTHLY AVERAGE 86/87 JULY 1986 4613 AUGUST 1986 4370 SEPTEMBER 1986 4234 OCTOBER 1986 4375 NOVEMBER 1986 3210 DECEMBER 1986 3168 JANUARY 1987 3306 FEBRUARY 1987 2638 MARCH 1987 3272 APRIL 1987 4445 MAY 1987 5321 JUNE 1987 4740 86/87 TOTAL 47693. 2 3974 MONTHLY AVERAGE 87/88 JULY 1987 4416 AUGUST 1987 525.E SEPTEMBER 1987 4837 OCTOBER 1987 4125 NOVEMBER 1987 3968 DECEMBER 1987 3645 JANUARY 1988 2894 FEBRUARY 1988 2787 MARCH 1988 3440 APRIL 1988 4577 MAY 1988 5854 JUNE 1988 5355 87/88 TOTAL 51151. 2 4263 MONTHLY AVERAGE 88/89 JULY 1988 4734 AUGUST 1988 5271 SEPTEMBER 1988 4837 OCTOBER 1988 4335 NOVEMBER 1988 4751 DECEMBER 1988 3431 JANUARY 1989 2815 FEBRUARY 1989 2618 MARCH 1989 4795 87/88 TOTAL YTD 37586. 3 3132 MONTHLY AVERAGE 53372 ESTIMATED YTD TOTAL o . 11111111 • Refuse Collection Budget Executive Summary Prepared by Cam Caldwell * The proposed Refuse Collection budget proposes an 8. 1% increase and an increase in the General Fund contribution from $289,000 to $555,915. This increase is largely the result of an $190,000 increase In Fleet Maintenance, a $39,472 increase in bond maintenance costs, a $99,000 increase in the Waste Disposal tipping fees, and a $26,700 increase in IMS charges. * Lease amortization and capital replacement costs are substantially underfunded in the proposed budget, and are creating a long term cost obligation that will need to be resolved. Council may wish. to request the Administration to develop a plan for funding the Refuse Collection Fund on a self-sustaining basis, for presentation to the City Council by February, 1990. • * The proposed budget does not address the issue of charging property owners for more than one garbage can. Council may wish to request the Administration to review the charges to property owners who use more than one can, for presentation to the City Council as part of its funding plan proposal. * The proposed IMS fee increase of $26,700 is related to the billing charge discussed by the Council in last year's budget process. Council may wish to reduce the amount of the Refuse Collection Fund by $26,700 for IMS services, and increase the Public Utilities Fund by that same amount. The net impact of that action would be to reduce the Public Utilities Fund capital improvement program for FY 1989-90. -1- • Refuse Collection Budget Council Staff Report Overview The Public Works Department proposed budget for the Refuse Collection Fund proposes and 8. 1% increase. The refuse collection program operates with eighteen staff and sixteen pieces of equipment. There are fourteen automated side-loading refuse trucks which cost about $109,000 each, plus a semi- automated rear-loading refuse truck. The FY 1989-90 proposed budget reflects a substantial increase in the General Fund subsidy due to four factors : 1) Fleet Maintenance costs which have consistently been higher than budgeted. The dollar impact on the budget is about $190,000 more than the current year. 2) An increase in the bond payment fee due to a decrease in the amount of available capitalized interest -and bond proceeds. The proposed budget shows a lease amortization increase of $146,000 more than last year. A $106,528 reduction has been made in the Fund Balance Reserve for depreciation to offset ' this increase. 3) A substantial 21% increase in tonnage coupled with an increase in the tipping rate. The dollar impact for Waste Disposal is budgeted to increase about $99,000. 4) A 24% increase, amounting to more than $27,600s in the IMS charges is the Public Works Department's portion of a charge ,for IMS refuse billing related costs. Public Utilities pays about $561 ,000 and Public Works pays. $142,658 to IMS for monthly billing services. Largely as a result of these four factors, the amount required from the General Fund to finance refuse collection will increase from $289,000 in the current year to $555,915. Level of Service • I spent a couple of hours on Thursday afternoon on a refuse collection route. I was impressed with the ability of the truck operator in maneuvering the truck in tight quarters and in articulating the hydraulic arm to pick up multiple cans without knocking them over. The individual route drivers are responsible for personally responding to service complaints along their routes. In winter the drivers pick up as many as 1 ,400 homes per day. The summer pick up averages about 900 homes per day due to the greater amount of garbage. Overall, the department has maintained service at the current year level, although efficiency has improved due to a reduction in staff by one position and a change from an eight hour to a ten hour work day. -2- Expenditure Increases Waste Disposal The projected tonnage increase for garbage collected has increased from 45,000 tons which was estimated last year to 57,000 for next year . This increase has been due to increased summer usage with the new garbage cans. In addition, effective in March, 1989, the City no longer enjoys a reduced tipping charge of $3 per ton. We must now pay the same $6 per ton tipping fee as other dump users, inasmuch as the credit due to the City from Salt Lake County has been used up. Fleet Maintenance The Fleet Maintenance cost for the past year was budgeted at $15,833 per month on the basis that the new vehicles were under warranty and would experience few repairs. Council may remember that I played a major part in arguing to _reduce the Fleet Maintenance allocation last year, based upon the fact that the vehicles were new. The actual experience history has shown a monthly average of nearly $30,000 per month in repairs and fuel. I talked with the vendor who sold the packers to the City. The comments of the vendor were that the maintenance costs were high due to the high number of homes being picked up per day. Based upon current City usage, the vendor has projected the life of the trucks at less than the normal life projections of packers in other cities. A five year average life projection is about as optimistic as Salt Lake City can reasonably expect, the vendor noted. Lease Amortization and 'Replacement Last year Council staff projected an annual depreciation cost of $512,500 for the packers and cans. That depreciation was based upon a six ' year amortization of the packers and a ten year amortization of the cans. Revising • that estimate based upon a five year amortization for the packers, the depreciation cost is projected at $567,000 annually. In addition, the bond payment for the 1989-90 fiscal year is $1 ,167,243. Those figures are not reflected in the amortization and replacement expenses of the Refuse Collection Fund. To the extent they are not reflected, the fund is creating a long term deficit that will eventually need to be financed. The current year retained earnings fund showed a June 30, 1988, balance which was $102,468 in the red. This total reflects the amount that remains in fund balance to replace vehicles and cans, in addition to the amount in the Bond Replacement Fund. In discussing the replacement scheduled for the packers with the Fleet Manager; he expressed his concerns about the Refuse Collection Fund adequately preparing for the financing of replacement packers. INS Charges Last year I advocated reducing the amount charged to the Refuse Collection Fund for garbage billing. That amount was cut from $250,000, plus IMS charges, to $140,000, plus IMS charges. As part of its City-wide increase in charges, Data Processing has indicated that they are increasing the amount being charged to Refuse Collection and Public Utilities for IMS services. Council may wish to consider limiting the amount charged to the Refuse Collection Fund to the amount approved last year, and increasing the Public Utilities budget by the amount not charged to the Refuse Collection Fund. The -3- impact on the Public Utilities Fund would probably be to reduce its ability to complete scheduled capital improvements in FY 1989-90. The dollar amount of savings, to the General Fund would be $26,700, with that amount added to -the -- Public Utilities Fund. Budget Summary The following is a summary of the major items of expenditure in the Refuse Collection Fund, comparing budget to budget, for FY 1988-89 and FY 1989-90. FY 88-89 FY 89-90 Employee Benefits $483,768 $490,516 Fleet Maintenance 199,583 390,016 Lease Amortization 639,000 785,000 Waste Disposal 245,996 345,000 IMS Charges 115,019 142,658 Billing from Pub. Ut. 140,000 140,000 Administ . Serv. Charges 162,255. 162,255 Total 2,519,500 2,723,974 . A slightly modified bar graph summary of this information is included as an attachment to this report. Policy Issues • Council has consciously acknowledged that the Refuse Collection Fund is both subsidized by the' General Fund and under funded with regard to full operating costs. The need to develop a funding plan for this fund was not formalized in a legislative intent during the budget process last year, although Council recognized the need to address this issue. With the increase in annual bond payment for trucks and cans, coupled with the high Fleet Maintenance expense and growing waste disposal tipping fees, the need to resolve the Refuse Collection Fund 's revenue shortfall has grown in importance. In addition, General Fund revenues do not appear to be available to meet the needs of Refuse Collection Fund deficits. Public Works and 'Council staff have also identified the need to increase the tipping fee for those who use the City/County Landfill. This issue will be addressed by the. Public Works Department during the General Fund budget presentation because cost information is not available at this time. The inequity of the charge to duplex and triple property owners was identified by the Administration and presented to the City Council last fall. Although the Council recognized this problem, the issue was not resolved in anticipation that the Administration might present an alternative plan as part of its budget proposal. No recommendation on this issue has been proposed by the Administration as part of this budget presentation, nor is the issue expected to be raised as part of the General Fund proposal to be submitted by the Mayor. -4- Staff Recommendation 1) Request the Administration to develop a plan for funding the Refuse Collection Fund on a self-sustaining basis, for presentation to the City Council by February, 1990. 2) Request the Administration to review the charges to property owners who use more than one can, for presentation to the City Council as part of its funding plan proposal. 3) Reduce the amount of the Refuse Collection Fund by $26,700 for IMS services, and increase the Public Utilities Fund by that same amount. • • -5- ,.. , • „ .: Refuse Collection Comparison Emp. Bens. FIt&Lease Waste Billing . • Other .•••••.•• .+.•:1.❖.•:4� , EMKI • 28 26 24 — 22 — 20 o 16 — y-.••.'.-.-.-.••••-.-•--•-. .❖•❖.❖+•+••❖.❖.••• .••••••••.••. 14 ` •••••+•••.•.•• .❖.❖.❖•❖.❖.❖.•. •❖.❖.❖.••❖.❖.•. 12 r •••..•.•.••.••. ............... •+�*•.•+•.�+•.•.•.++•+•.•.++• •••�+�.•••.�+�•+•••••.�.•. . •❖❖••••••••••❖.❖••••. .j••.j.••❖.j..❖•.....j• 10 — ........•..... .•••••.••.•.•. ••.•.❖+❖•••❖.❖.❖i •.•iiii�iiii❖iiii .�.❖.•+❖.•.•.•+•+•.s.•.•. •.+.❖.•.••❖.•.•.••❖.• ♦•••.•••••••.• ••••••••••••. 8 .••.•••.•••••• •••+•••••••••• .❖.•••.❖••.•••�❖•❖•• .•iiiiiiiiiii�i•* .......•••••.•♦ .•••••••••••• - i••❖••••••+❖.••❖•❖••. •••••••••+•.❖.••••❖•❖•• 6 _ .••+•••••+•..• •...•.•.•..... ••••••.•••.••. • •••••••••.•••. • . ,•w.,•.•,+.►..•w....a..i......A.A.. .t....�..........+.• ... 4 : 2 —0 J /�// l a FY 88--89 FY 89 --90 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY IPUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 1 RECL44f4r ti 1 s ��y O 1 vj°PCY a 'M A1��► i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 I1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE * SALT LAKE CITY , UTAH 84115 * 80I-483-676i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES ' BUDGET REQUEST FOR YEAR 1989-90 1 1 1 1 IISALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES PROPOSED BUDCE'1' I FY 89-90 GENERA/, 1 NF(HVt4T ION II Organizational Chart 1 Budget Highlights 2-3 I Budget Policy Issues 4 Requested Personnel Changes 5 Employee Chart 6 IIManning Summary 7 WATER UTILITY BUD E7' IProjected Operating Statement 8 Revenue Forecast 9 IOperations Chart 10 Program Budget Changes 11 I Budget Recap 12-13 10 Year Actuals by Program 14-15 Capital Improvement Chart 16 I Age of Facilities (One) 17 Age of Facilities (Two) 18 ICapital Request 19-23 5 Year Capital Improvement Program 24-26 ISEWER UTILITY BUDGET Projected Operating Statement 27 I Revenue Forecast 28 Operations Chart 29 Program Budget Changes 30 IBudget Recap 31-32 10 Year Actuals By Program 33-34 I Capital Improvement Chart 35 Capital Request 36-41 I 5 Year Capital Improvement Program 42-45 RATE INCREASE I Explanation of Rate Changes 46 Comparison of Annual Water & Sewer Bills 47 Water Rate Compar i son 48 ISewer Rate Comparison 49 Water Rate Comparison With Consumer Price Index 50 I Water Cash Flow (With Rate Increase) 51 Sewer Cash Flow (With Rate Decrease) 52 PUBLIC UTILITIES ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FISCAL YEAR 1989 - 90 • PUBLIC UTILITIES LEROY W. HOOTON JR. DIRECTOR I ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT I MANAGER I l CRAIG HANSEN J SUPERINTENDENT WATER 1 ENGINEERING \ / BUDGET & ACCOUNTING ` , SUPERINTENDENT WATER SUPPLY II WATER WORKS CHIEF ENGINEER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RECLAMATION WENOELL EVENSEN GEORGE JORGENSEN AA LEWIS E. TIM DOXEY / \ 1 \, J \ J IPUBLIC UTILITIES BUDGET 1H1®IL1OfTS II BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS: II With the adoption of the fiscal year 1989-90 Budget, the Public Utilities Department will continue to provide a high level of water and wastewater treatment for the residents of Salt Lake City and water treatment for our county service area. II To finance major capital improvements required by the Water Utility Fund in our 5 Year Capital Improvement Program, it is proposed that water rates be II increased by 1096 and sewer rates be decreased by 696 which will have a net effect of raising overall rates by 496. I The Public Utilities Department is made up of two Enterprise Funds a Water Utility Fund and a Sewer Utility Fund. The reason why enterprise funds were established is to provide a financial structure where the intent of the governing body is that the costs of providing goods or services to the general public could II be recovered through user charges and operate in a manner similar to private business. I Both utility funds are proposing very conservative budget requests. ,MENDED PT.TECI ED PROPOSED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET II 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90 WATER UTILITY Operations $15, 243, 601 $15,597, 687 $15, 281, 199 $15, 215,436 I Capital improvements & Debt Service 8, 069, 269 12, 912, 313 10, 755,575 9, 069, 864 $23, 312, 870 $28,510, 000 $26, 036, 774 $24, 285, 300 I PERCENTAGE CHANGE CLMPARED TO: TOTAL I OPERATIONS BUDGET Actual 1987 88 096 496 Amended Budget 1988-89 (296) (1596) IIProjected Actuals 1988-89 .496 (896) AMENDED PRO1ELTED PROPOSED ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET T BUDGE I II 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90 SEDER UTILITY Operations $5,513, 761 $6, 099, 110 $5, 857,339 $6, 112, 768 I Capital Improvements & Debt Service 6, 286, 858 16, 900, 916 9, 850, 916 15,577, 950 $11, 800, 611 $23, 000,026 $15, 708, 255 $21 , 690, 718 II PERCENTAGE CHANGE Ct1t1PARED TO: 7r7T AL, I OPERATIONS BUIXE7_ Actual 1987- 88 1", 8496 II Amended Budget 1988-89 .2)6 (t �) Projected Actuals 1988-89 496 2896 I2 The proposed Capital Improvement Program for the Water Utility and Sewer Utility has been reduced over the current amended budget, however, the department ' will continue an active program of waterline replacement with the passage of the proposed rate increase. The Sewer Utility will continue to implement the needed improvements listed in the 5 Year Capital improvement Program including ' installation of new drying beds and installation of major trunk lines in the Northwest Quadrant . The budget as submitted provides funding to maintain the current level of ' service which will continue to provide the high level of service enjoyed by the city's Public Utilities customers. DI-Reports ' 3 BUDGET POLICY ISSUES 1 1. Proposed 1U% water rate increase to finance 5 Year Capital Improvement Progran (See separate section Rate Increase) ' 11 . Proposed 696 decrease in sewer rates due to canplction of the first phase of the 201 Cash Flow Plan. (See separate section Rate Increase) 111 . Service level increase of two additional Watershed Patrol Officers to help maintain control and help monitor water quality in our canyons. ' IV. Service level increase of Personnel Representative to assist our department in personnel matters. ' V. Service level increase of one part-time Canal Maintenance person to increase monitoring and cleaning of the city and county canal system which must be maintained to service our water rights associated with them. ' V1 . Sewer Utility Budget increased due to higher costs for waste disposal, expanson of laboratory testing required, and additional operating costs associated with the start up of the Trickling Filter and Solids Contact ' project. V/I . Funding for employee's merit increases or cost of living increases are not included in this proposed budget. Funding for approved increase would require the Capital Improvement Program be reduced. r r I I I I I ' 4 ' PUBLIC l_II'I L I T I ES REQUESTED PERScXVNEL (RANGES PERSONNEL CHANCES: • 1 . Addition of a Personnel Representative to assist in hiring. I ' firing, and other department personnel matters. 2. Deletion of one Accounts Collector fran custaner service. -1 ' Due to the inplementatt ion of monthly billing and mailing out shut off notices, this position is no longer necessary. 3. Deletion of one Engineering Technician fran Transmission -1 ' and Distribution. This position is no longer required due to new canputer technology. ' 4. Deletion of one Civil Engineer position Fran Transmission -1 and Distribution. This position is no longer required due to new canputer technology. ' 5. Deletion of one-half of one hourly billing clerk in the -.5 Billing Department. This position could be cut back due to increased efficiency. ' 6. Deletion of two hourly Custaner Service Clerks in the -2 Customer Service Department due to increased efficiency and implementation of the 'tenthly billing procedure. ' 7. Deletion of one-half of one hourly Meter Repair position. -.5 This was allowed due to increased efficiency of the department. ' 8. Deletion of one hourly Water Treatment Operator at Parley's -1 Treatment Plant. This now converts all treatment plants to ' running only one operator on the night shift. The employees have access to an emergency bracelet in case of an emergency. 9. Addition of two seasonal Watershed Patrol employees to help 2 ' increase control and maintenance of our canyons and high quality canyon streams. This next year they will assist in setting traps for the gypsy moth infestation. ' 10. Addition of one part-time Canal Maintenance man to increase 1 monitoring and cleaning of the city and county canal system which rust be maintained to secure water rights associated with them. 11. Deletion of one. hourly Tharp Station Maintenance man which -1 ' was no longer needed due to new technology. 12. Deletion of one-half of one hourly Engineering Tech -.5 no longer required due to new technology. -4. 5 These changes will decrease the Public Utilities manning document by (2) full time positions and (2.5) full time equivalent positions. This means that the Public Utilities Department has decreased their manning document for the last four years and decreased by (21. 27) positions since 1978. I ' DI --Reports 5 I I I g UR �v, 8n I 18 N 111 I a Ma I11111111/1181111111111811111181/11111111111111111111111111111 Sal iMI — wM I St 1pa Ca 1-..-- J ma W Pi 18 _ _ PC ta 05 09 III s . _ ._ s !s a 1 an 1 '� o 18 Ca I 1111 M I WI N =5 1 szi 181 L _____ __ _ . . _ ._...... . I I I I u I R ' I n R , I I I I 6 I ' R)H.IC U1]LiTJE�DhPAR1TINT MANillZ attlARY ' BY EITAL YEAR I APPREFRIATIQV R tZI[ERR 0[9 PICZJ 78/79 79/80 eq/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/05 85/86 86/87 87/88 88/89 89/90 ' 4Y+'IQ2 UPILPFY 5101 Sauce of S ply 8.00 11.00 12.00 14.0D 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 12.03 13.23 5103 Power and awing 12.00 11.00 11.00 14.00 6.40 5.40 5.40 5.40 5.4D 5.40 6.40 6.30 5105 Rlificatim 41.00 51.00 52.00 54.00 43.50 45.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 42.00 41.00 43.0) II 5107 lansnissim and Distribution 133.00 141.00 137.00 135.00 123.95 122.45 125.45 126.95 124.95 120.17 120.17 116.87 5109 Slop Maintcno 45.0D 48.50 33.00 33.50 37.85 36.35 36.35 33.35 34.35 33.85 32.85 33.35 5111 Clistnrer Acoantirg&Wllectim 45.00 43.50 55.00 49.50 49.25 44.75 46.75 43.75 49.75 56.00 56.00 52.50 ' 5113 F6ter Adninistraticn 13.00 13.00 10.00 10.00 7.20 8.20 7.20 6.50 7.50 8.50 8.00 8.50 5113 Public Utilities Adninistratim 0.0D 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.5D 1.00 1.00 ' 4➢17ER UPILPIY TOTAL 311.00 325.00 315.00 316.00 277.18 274.18 278.18 278.98 278.98 278.45 277.45 274.75 SEVER OPII.IIY 522) Lift Sations 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.03 6.00 6.03 6.0D 5.00 6.00 7.00 II 5230 Wllectim 0Vsteu 32.0) 32.0D 45.00 32.53 36.50 33.50 32.50 31.50 23.50 32.E 31.E 78.98 52E0 F�clanetim Plant 53.00 55.00 55.00 66.25 66.67 0.27 67.27 66.27 64.00 63.03 63.00 62.00 5230 03starer S8vic 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.85 3.25 4.25 5.25 6.25 5.00 5.0D 5.00 ' 5290 ar.AUC Iduinistratim 2.00 2.0D 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.50 5.00 5295 Pdtlic Utilities Adninibliatim 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 ' 31FR UPILPIY IOTA, 94.00 96.00 110.00 103.33 114.02 114.02 113.02 113.02 110.75 110.78 110.78 103.93 FUELIC UPILPIIES I7PAL 405.00 421.00 425.00 425.38 331.20 338.20 391.20 332.00 339.73 399.23 339.23 333.73 ' 0rer or Urhr(-) Prior Year 16 4 0.33 -34.13 -3 3 0.8 -2.27 -0.5 -1 -4.5 ' 0,er or U>ir(-) 78/79 0era11 -21.27 II ' 01-J1/402/88-REK 7 I 1) I I I I I I warE• I I I I I I I II) IWATER UTILITY ENTERPR I SE FUND IPROJLC 1 E_D OPERAT I NC STATEMENT FOR YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1989 AND 1990 IIPROPOSED PROJECTED PROPOSED [JPJAL, A*NU1?ENT AC7UALS BUDGET RESOURCES 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90 I Revenues Sales & Charges for Services $19, 625, 971 $19, 350, 000 $19, 350, 000 $18, 662, 000 Proposed Rate Increase 2, 000, 000 I Interest Incase 918,437 625, 000 655, 000 350, 000 Other Revenue 1, 947, 819 1,004, 000 972, 000 972, 000 $21,592, 227 $20, 979, 000 $20, 977, 000 $21, 984, 000 Other Sources I Grants & Other Related Revenue $ 801,454 $ 235, 000 $ 260, 000 $ 275, 000 Transfer fran Reservoir & Supply Line Fees 222, 696 686, 600 686, 600 26, 300 II Bond Proceeds Loan Fran Sewer utility 1, 048, 665 2,000,000 1,556,355 U 1,500,000 0 1,500, 000 Total Other Sources $ 2, 072, 815 $ 4,421, 600 $ 2,502, 955 $ 1, 801 ,300 ITOTAL RESOURCES $23, 665, 042 $25,400, 600 $23,479, 955 $23, 785, 300 USES II E `CPEND I TURES Cost of Sales & Service: Water Supply $ 2, 099, 080 $ 2,574,398 $ 2, 778, 107 $ 2, 385,550 II Water Power & Plumping 1, 834, 862 1, 825, 656 1,528, 981 1,500,326 Water Treatment 2, 724, 919 2, 745, 028 2,471,522 2, 752, 634 Water Distribution 3, 630, 867 3, 611,483 3, 650,499 3;641, 079 Water Support Services 1,460, 840 1,455, 916 1,402, 981 1,500, 889 IITotal Sales & Services $11, 750,568 $12, 212,481 $11, 832, 090 $11, 780, 478 General & Administrative: I Water Custaner Service $ 2, 064, 302 $ 1, 954.514 $ 2, 091,836 $ 1 , 956, 693 Administrative & General 1,456, 266 1,430, 692 1,357,274 1, 478, 265 I Total Gen & Admin. $ 3,520,568 $ 3,385,206 $ 3,449, 110 $ 3,434, 958 Capital Expenditures $ 5,338,321 $ 9,917,513 $ 8, 120, 774 $ 6, 168, 084 Debt Service 2, 703,413 2, 994, 800 2, 634, 800 2, 901 , 780 I Total Capital & Debt Service $ 8, 041, 734 $12, 912,313 $10, 755,574 $ 9, 069, 864 II 101AL. USES $23, 312, 870 $28,510,000 $26, 036, 774 $24, 285, 300 Excess Revenue And Other Sources Over (Under) Uses 352, 172 (3, 109,400) (2,556, 819) (500, 000) II Operating Cash Balances Beginning July 1 $ 4, 197,856 $ 4,549,528 $ 1 , 992, 709 I Ending June 30 4,549,528 1, 992, 709 1,492, 709 Operating cash balance is defined as total cash less restricted amounts for bond Icovenants and outstanding accounts payable. I 01 -Reports 8 immimmimmimmimi WATER UTILITY OPERATING COMPARISON IN THOUSANDS WATER CONTROLABLE SALARIES UTILITIES PURCHASES SERVICES 20000 t - - ------- 18000 t- 1' 18000 i- 15.2 15.3 15.2 I, F 7 r� ram-{ 14000 1- 13.4 // % ' r I- 11 9 12.7 per/;, ; r,�, 1 12000 •- �•♦ • , .-.,, , 11 .0 �,�,, �' �, .) :X�� x1 10.2 10.4 • ,,_,- ✓/,. -•_. • r-gr �:' "�x# �.. 4000 : :.: :::-x 1 . 2 000 :.� p . 1 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 YEAR P/ICX2?/M BUDC�;T CHANGES t WATER l>T I l i TY FIND I1 . SCU cWE OF SUPPLY This program has increased by the allocation of 20 percent of our Assistant Operation and Maintenance Manager who is now responsible for this program. Also ' this program has been increased by an additional hourly position to help keep up with maintaining, cleaning, and monitoring of our irrigation system. ' The operation and maintenance budget has decreased due to the amount budgeted for the purchase of Metropolitan Water. Cir department has purchased increased quantity of water over the last two years, the current amount budgeted is an average of the last ten years. ' 2. PCR AND PUMP I NG This program is totally dependent on the weather and the amount of water ' required to pump and distribute through our system. The amount budgeted is a ten year average adjusted for additional wells and pumps. ' 3. PURIFICATION This program over the last 2 years has decreased the number of treatment plant operators by 3 full time positions and one part-time by changing to running with only a one operator on the night shift with safety precautions. Also four ' years ago to be more cost effective this area contracted out to the County Sheriffs Department to patrol the county canyons. This year to help implement the goals in the Salt Lake City Watershed Master Plan we are requesting (2) ' additional seasonal employees. 4. TRAN9'1I SS ION AND D I STR I BU1'I ON This program continues to stream line its operation and has eliminated (2) ' full time employees and (1) part-time employee. Operating cost increased due to additional computer maintenance contract on our new G/S and AUTO CAD system. This program also increased by centralizing the cost of our telemetering trunk line ' system in the amount of $30, 000 dollars from the shops and maintenance program. 5. CUSTGMER SERVICE AND AC OUNT I NG ' This program continues to stream line its operation also and has eliminated (1 ) full time collectors position and (2.5) hourly position due to iri lernentation of monthly billing and mailing out shut off notices. The increase in operations is associated with increase in Data Processing charges and increase in negotiated ' contracts with our lock box payment 'system and the contract we have for inserting and mailing of bills. ' 6. WATER ADl1I N I STRAT lON This program increased due to the addition of our new personnel representative position this past year. Also, operations have increased due to ' additional consultant fees for cloud seeding and consultants in connection with water rights issues and our irrigation exchange agreements. Also, an increase in administrative service fees are currently being expected. This budget does not contain funds for salary increases and all such funding would have to be cut out ' of our proposed Capital I provement Program. DI Reports ' 11 I I FIB UITLITl S-4w+R 1411FR IFP RDE RE/H11S 02/22 89 ALL YEARS 7/1/81-6/33412 910[}I W33133 I ALT U. , 7 A) lC1UAL ACEAL ACQIAL TEN YEAR196Y08D AC131N3` eL9G[, r197)' ET.32A. FISCAL FI3'N, F1XAL FL9CA1. FL4'N. FI.491, F1.4N. AYQY(E INCREA2 F1.90% N). AC03N3'TI11L' 197-80 1930.81 193182 1982-83 193384 1984-85 1935-86 19%,-87 1937-83 1933-83 1982-83 09 19221)901 1019-50 I CpENAT8G WANES 1601 013:331D 9343 8,790,627 9,831,8.35 10,446,176 9,721,933 9,636,804 12,194,503 14,664,136 14,747,947 16,433,193 16,250,000 12,275,733 3,224,261 15,500,000 1631 PRZCE D RALE MAFA9 0 2,020,020 2,000,CCD 1623 ELATE 1381E SALES 52,431 51,414 62,236 36,083 93,532 43,922 41,001 44,422 42,214 47,000 51,237 -11,237 43,660 I 1666 t4TP8N7C FkNW.S 93,600 93,CiJ0 83,000 LL 8 8 6,30 109,000 1(8,03) 1(B4Om 108,IX0 133,000 103,003 104,600 J,JB) 1®,07J 1618 REPAIR I FIILXY4'103 45,651 43,937 52,562 .933 94, 1 63.034 47,302 43,010 96,389 40,000 60,162 -2,162 43,000 1619 081R F65)363 17,735 66,335 57,791 65,476 77,444 43,010 43,233 103,012 133,6135 41,003 (6,111 -25,111 41,0)0 1801 (701(1411FBAIS 23,1399 13,7C0 82,932 64,860 25A51 34,936 35.198 33,433 41,393 35,00) 33.237 -4.27 35210 1830 MEREST 25 T TE ,t301 563,92 W 936,212 234,661 1,105,050 833,676 849,116 621,905 716,669 575,003 666,703 -316,703 350,O I 1890 9.142RK FEXrriFS 21,476 15,057 21.834 23 A71 32,871 (9,555 7,411 10,5,0 16,03) 17,121 -1,321 16,000 1955 0119i IMtI44N) RE111110441115(9300 54,274 123,243 126,634 322,930 346,051 317,750 4)6,030 462.000 777,500 552,033 351,557 2)3043 552,032 (03446K0s) 240,0) 140,3X7) 38,000 102,03 143,000 I2917.L 0 PAt%G 9,115,118 10,00,713 11,512,93 11,213,621 11,514,934 13,707,841 16,213,691 16,183,236 18,654,543 17,797,033 13,670,713 5,151,212 18,822,003 l03LIPEtA'17lG I 1631 Al !MEMO SAFES-RATE 8139601 1931 0 0 1,223,147 2,773,322 2,692,241 2,843,571 3A 003,573 3,12i,210 3,142,812 3,23)7 ) 2,201/97 9E0,513 3,162,0 183) 141k}1�'1N0]£e34) 0 0 54,477 938,334 374,713 213.363 426,331 573,443 192,262 80,000 247,804 -247,904 0 1310 ONHII 33013N 81 933)3(1.GRANT 266,672 107,363 161,052 141,607 113,303 38.3)0 0 0 0 0 99.776 -99.776 0 I 1734 GAIN CN SALE OF PROPS Ti 132,723 136,932 24.589 31.016 18,935 22,82 17,923 55,043 4o.003 47,960 -7,960 43,030 1840 LAN)SALES 155,443 0 8,933 93,43) 1,275 0 75.017 25.00E -25,0 8 0 1841 H11ID1G SUS 2,557 0 3,323 8Al2 0 0 0 0 1,429 -1,423 0 I 1843 Ba1HPIIlr SAFES 9,JE 0 9,53 0 15,056 35,5)2 0 6,917 -6,917 0 1910.10 021IRIEU 1RNS IN AID 10��'43338 15 68,654 25,.336 22.580 21,593 23.941 23.271 256,133 161,972 233,545 10,00 85,318 -55.318 30,000 1910.20 QHQ21871R21S IN AID 10 4319T M85 271,174 34,190 111,436 2,710 73,967 263,703 476,930 ll,554 5.01) 125,033 -100,033 25,01) I 19ll (124c3I87rII1 S IN AID 10 W1)r 74-379333 336,131 156,119 88.142 62,477 85,494 118,637 143,596 55,031 131,69 180,000 141,237 3,763 100,0) 1964 LYN 9333 9343R 1,500000 I 1970 13W14FR 1701 RAZE INLI A9'•;11434,E I18,823 173,917 0 187,000 0 0 43A74 -43,474 0 1975.01 39914411 3104 Fe4RVO1R4 6 H14LY L815 CIT1 0 0 033,643 797,150 141,733 186,6C9 332,53) 45.463 327,00) 189,913 -183,613 6.33) I 1975.02 11W1FR ACM 14-2114301317 6 3433LY 1.815(L1281Y 505,997 333,961 323,411 211,3334 500.030 564,075 19,493 300,994 177,233 399,30 3)2,418 -232,4113 27,000 WA 431)190310-1931 1,618,14) 1,841,517 1,736,051 23,147 0 0 0 0 745,551 -745,551 0 I WA 814)1903315-1932 1,654,076 6,633,057 2.521,971) 833,778 1,303.051 0 0 0 Ib93.H30 -1 b59,E310 0 R01)Ratko PRIMED 1,075,523 1,556,355 28,721 -2A3.721 0 Fh INS NR IM14NE 281,871 1�,6X) 534,933 193,546 666,261) 1,443,315 2,456,819 .930,639 33,361 5.32,03) I TI AL(0(-dflAYCI1G 1,6(5,841 82,742 5,74,241 13,345,818 8,413,352 5.033,8 8 5,883c 3 16,933A^A 16,467,E 78,234,774 6,876,331 -2,913,031 5463,30) 'IDP4.F 86113 10.793.993 11.636.455 17.761.X11 74 541 M') 11 QM Tr. ro 'Y.7.1 71417.11a 3.Ya.11) 74.235.TY1 II tWATER 17r1Lr1Y FINE DI BUDGET FIDGET RECAP WTR 831 RCP IIFI AL YEAR 199-1990 03/15/89 1939 1990 MENDED EU:Er DIFFERENCE PEIdCIIVPACE I APPR. FULL PART RILL PART ACTUAL MEP ESr1NY11ID RHx E I D Eu Er 70 RIME DIE'FYRII3� RI. TIME TIME TIME TIME 1937-1988 1935-1939 1983-]989 1089-1990 SALARIES& ERIDL;E BEFFP'1'1' II 5101 SLECE F RIPPLY 10.00 2.03 10.20 3.03 231,105 295,243 235,954 304,270 8,952 0.0303 5103 PCN R AND PU•PIND 3.40 3.00 3.30 3.00 120,193 149,306 124,879 145,326 -3,980 -0.0267 ' 5105 PCRIFICATICN 5107�ADLR9ISSICN& DISC 35.00 5.00 37.00 6.00 1,297,178 1,254,363 1,254,498 1,336,584 82,221 0.0665 LU.15 9.02 10 .85 8.02 3,181,124 3,158,453 3,242 855 3,102,579 -55,879 -0.0177 5103 SOPS&MAEVI NANCE 30.85 2.00 31.85 1.50 1,018,897 941,562 992,873 934,299 42,737 0.0454 ' 5111 Q1SICFER SERVICE&ACCLG 43.00 8.00 47.00 5.50 1,233,033 1,234,066 1,232,704 1,242,793 -41,273 -0.0321 5113 WATER ADhIINIS1PA1 CN 7.50 0.50 8.00 0.50 238,3(6 472,036 274,339 339,195 -132,891 -0.2315 5113 PUBLIC UrILTTIFS ALMIN 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 43,443 50,423 49,817 50,420 8 -0.0007 ' SIB 10PAL ?ERSSI4L aR/iCES 247.90 29.55 247.2D 27.55 7,473,236 7,605,517 7,515,919 7,505,396 -100,121 -0.0132 IICP'EFATIINIG E7QFNDI1[RFS 5101 SDIRCE CF SUPPLY 1,817,975 2,279,150 2,459,153 2,051,350 -197,80D -0.0393 ' 5103 PLZ+ER AND?OWING 5106 FCRIFICar1a 1,714,6($ 1,676,350 1,399,102 1,355,000 -321,350 -0.1917 1,427,741 1,490,665 1,217,024 1,416,050 -74,615 -0.0501 5107 IRPNIIISEaCNI& DISC 449,742 453,025 407,644 533,500 85,475 0.1E7 5103 SHOPS&MAR 441,943 514,354 410,1C8 516,590 2,236 0.0143 II 5111 CUSHIER S RVICE&PLCLG 826,2� 670,443 809,132 713,900 43,452 0.C643 5113 F&33 R A[NIIDIISIRlK11Q4 1,083,320 904,478 1,029,106 1,035,400 180,922 0.2700 5113 PUBLIC UTILITIES 3,657 3,70D 4,011 3,25D -450 -0.1216 I3B 7T11.[,-(PERIXPIC45 7,770,315 7,992,170 7,765,230 7,710,040 -282,130 -0.mci IITOTAL PERS:NAL SERVICE&CPER. 15,243,601 15,597,667 15,251,199 15,215,436 -382,251 -0.CP45 II ' 12 1 1 VATfR UPILPM RI'IJ Dl BUDGET 81X3ET RECAP VaR 83rFP I FIeet& YEW 1989-1990 0W/15/89 PTEN D WIDGET ACM. ALIUAL IIDCET ESTIMATED REQUESTED IU1EP I ND- 1987--1988 19 3-1989 1938-1939 1939-199D DIFFERENCE PEFONPASE C4PrPAL EXPEDDPIU+ES 1 FINANCED-CURRENT FARM CS 2,067,876 3,491,313 1,684,575 3,136,564 -344,749 -0.0990 FIN8NCE-AID TD(IN 431,857 235,00D 235,00D 235,000 0 0.00DO I FINNI�RESIRIC36)EUADS 222,696 696,600 696,600 26,300 -660,30D -0.9617 FINANCD-RATE INCREASE 177,056 439,2C0 439,290 270,220 -I63,980 -0.3347 ETDY�I D-15139 RAZE Ilx3 A� 2,000,000 2,000,OCO FINANCED-BM PEAS 1,005,52D 2,O60,DOD 2,050,00D 0 -2,050,00D -1.0000 1 FINANOED-SiNPUJS 1,433,315 3,025,400 3,025,400 9)0,003 -2,525,400 -0.8347 3E4O'AIr1APITAL EXPEND. 5,333,321 9,917,513 8,120,775 6,169,654 -3,749,429 -0.3781 1 1881'RE2TREVENr I BAD PRINCIPAL 86 JSIF 924,300 903,800 903,80D 999,350 95,550 0.1057 821)%TERM 86 LS' 1,713,441 1,�6,000 1,696,000 1,632,430 -63,SA -0.0318 IN>FJ�FSr 18 MAN FROM S3FI2 0 250A00 0 250,000 0 81N)1N PDIE EXPENSE 65,672 15,000 20,000 20,000 5,000 0.2500 I VATERNAIN N71ES PAYAEQE 27,535 140A00 25,020 -140,000 -5.6000 SJB-10114,DEBT RETIRE. 2,730,943 2,994,9DD 2,634,800 2,901,780 -93,020 -0.0311 1 10PAL B103ET 23,312,370 23,510,000 26,036,774 24,285,300 -4,224,703 -0.1422 1 1 1 ' 13 ' 5109 SIPS&MAINIENAKE ' 02030 WR(CRDER CFFICE 02100 57,631 65,1f0 E9,624 72,311 81,437 102,015 1()Fi,999 107,265 102,192 111,924 89,199 1ll,274 �� 105,811 103,171 105,473 84,717 147,218 129,E89 133,522 139,C84 141,873 154,333 147,812 152,600 022)0 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 277,647 303,4E8 302,985 401,1E5 330,207 331,1E8 370,436 447,529 499,750 394,106 413,437 430,0E4 02AMGARKE 337,051 320,171 231,517 249,4)4 331,010 3)3,207 336,343 246,913 2E9,48) 330,140 232,143 346,856 II 02400 hEI3R REPAIR 203,830 159,277 173,407 187,378 204,652 180,522 181,375 164,780 193,425 213,1E0 112,450 225,925 02500 B 1RICAL 6 11IFME1[bt 110,852 142,899 133,513 231,910 214,811 220,893 237,277 241,1E9 254,141 252,248 257,967 234,170 ' IOIAL 968,617 1,092,822 1,104,146 1,116,931 1,226,785 1,359,335 1,357,494 1,371,032 1,346,750 1,4E0,8 3 1,455,916 1,432,991 1,500,899 5111 I451FR cuesyR SERVICES ' 02603 NEIER READING 213,415 252,6E0 266,296 230,551 234,946 296,745 303,017 302,901 341,1E8 315,540 357,372 357,280 02700 BILLING 359,207 335,22 457,531 442,847 432,642 570,2C8 634,172 715,623 906,845 754,344 881,379 769,977 02300 Q SPCMER SERVICE 235,106 391,E89 338,435 3C9,878 410,025 433,377 476,894 453,812 550,370 612,334 554,462 935,238 ' 02903 PCCOUITIG 143,411 140,212 174,216 193,833 233,78E 243,976 276,154 245,813 265,919 272,246 298,623 324,143 1OIIAL E86,434 950,139 1,079,789 1,196,523 1,227,106 1,361,401 1,934,306 1,690,237 1,723,149 2,064,302 1,954,514 2,091,836 1,956,693 ' 5113 WRIER N)UNISIRATICN 03000 O Z44LSSI HERS OFFICE 64,926 II03100 ADTCI1 71,493 E8,785 67,478 46,976 52,619 63,071 54,452 51,3� 52,104 54,128 53,823 53,670 032)0 GENERAL( EP),T1CNS 90,824 272,833 206,913 219,350 319,266 346,153 339,731 937,977 742,072 712,344 700,224 715,848 03300 02hYKTS&CCNSIFUTICN 81,656 115,062 114,224 133,216 L54,821 107,154 113,814 163,583 162,373 1E4,220 137,043 153,747 ' 102AL 454,475 33,893 456,630 333,615 404,542 526,706 516,373 556,997 802,873 956,554 933,692 891, 95 92,265 ' OIIIER CPERKCIDG E QENSES CCI4R18J1.'IQ3S 10 GENERAL RND 433,033 236,918 406,226 429,923 4E3,393 489,932 454,E84 526,052 493,617 500,000 452,617 550,033 INCOM 3AB[E POSRNIS 67,700 52,5C8 195,091 -16,338 85,794 23,445 151,050 180,772 13,561 0 13,561 0' (ETA EMICEEES 31,E92 ]�,066 0 0 0 SALARY QNPII3�IJ� 0 0 0 ' 10TAL 523,292 502,392 463,493 601,317 413,540 549,153 518,427 E05,734 706,824 472,173 500,000 4E6,179 550,000 ' C19P/1)T:MAL 7,804,526 9,210,305 9,461,697 10,166,235 10,372,035 10,937,679 11,895,964 12,735,756 13,523,223 15,243,602 15,597,697 15,231,199 15,215,435 1 ' 15 ' PUBLIC UrILrrrEs-WATER[mum FIN) DL/REGEL CPER4TDO E PEIDr1URES-COMPARISON 0310/89 ' FOR PERIOD 7/1/80 TH43J3I 6/32089 AIMED ' ACTUAL ALIU AL AQikL AORTAL ACTUAL PCIUAL ALIUAL KSUAL PCIUAL ALIUAL 7CIIYAL 91C£r 12 MOIIH WEBBED FI' AI YR FL9CAL YR FISAL YR FIRN YR FISAL YR FIT AL YR FISAL YR F13AL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATED FISAL YEAR APRIOPRIATIC11-C CENIFR 1977-78 1978-79 1979,90 1980-81 1931-82 1932-83 1983-84 1934-85 1935-86 1986-87 1937-93 19313-89 19833-69 1939-90 ' 5101 WATER SJ LY 00100 CANAL MAJNJFNE 92,514 119,887 123,957 131,507 146,935 152,693 193,247 195,036 183,975 188,375 172,190 139,175 189,893 ' 00233 SANE OF WEER 510,541 1,066,513 843,883 1,037,335 822,143 725,127 737,600 1,064,816 1,251,633 1,910,705 2,402,2 8 1,4870E84 2,195,W2 TOTAL 414,237 603,0E5 1,186,390 967,84E 1,218,847 9E9,133 877,785 895,847 1,249,912 1,444,603 2,039,030 2,574,33 1,676,893 2,385,550 ' 5103 WATER PO ER& FWIN3 00300 IFIP FIILS 212,556 231,376 360,888 327,751 367,719 322,493 331,493 435,863 431,599 617,929 561,82) 510,784 413,522 ' C0403 870EQER RMPIFG 00500 IId2IC�ICN RMPIFG 353,729 444,129 543,023 572,319 535,144 633,491 763,874 855,784 839,714 985,605 1,OC8 862 834,540 903 830 54,114 74,134 93,493 117,175 67,240 66,355 139,679 146,312 164,840 231,327 254,974 319,29E 171,974 ' TCMAL 537,187 625,42) 749,639 997,410 1,017,245 1,02),103 1,032,339 1,241,051 1,487,960 1,436,153 1,834,861 1,825,656 1,714,622 1,503,326 5105 MIER PURIFICATION ' 00E00 MINED PATROL 171,751 190,925 218,504 215,656 190,204 198,894 223,464 227,198 239,011 365,294 299,604 263,216 355,390 0070E CITY CPEIIC 234,901 316,424 312,671 375,892 405,940 419,302 421,842 451,7E6 537,672 642,492 511,799 835,09) 473,031 00800 PARLFCS 312,710 367,5E4 354,834 403,337 533,987 499,554 524834 525,435 526,767 505,636 520,940 5E0,181 532,016 ' 03333 BIG O71 MECO 01000 CR76S C N4xTIKI3.SAEPiE 3]9,989 530,830 499,573 453,575 540,660 543,313 665,356 578,276 596,176 522,993 619,944 595,412 573,213 33,234 33,613 43,077 55,675 73,475 84,703 83,578 91,754 99,251 71,361 92,741 89,293 118,384 01100 h131TCPOUT1AN WATER 636,031 425,667 499,917 521,878 418,233 323,033 626,6E8 439,676 677,29 717,143 703,000 965,000 D),000 ' TOTAL 1,440,896 1,774,716 1,930,023 1,923,636 2,026,013 2,137,549 2,079,835 2,543,792 2,374,111 2,676,136 2,724,919 2,745,023 3,333,231 2,752,634 S107 1FANS I ]IN&ma. II01200 DRAFPIFG 177,889 2)1,195 223,477 257,621 253,677 255,674 170,077 183,647 137,191 0 0 0 0 01303 EN311I22IIN 233,970 230,193 153,125 134,534 188,962 164,833 163,280 203,193 190,W2 982,6)7 564,891 565,843 535,579 ' 01400 DISERIE[1PB)O1500 QOFUIFR 513,726 545,256 586,061 E83,237 794,43E 801,761 7W,137 877,622 884,168 903,335 968,776 922,192 606,903 46,353 76,302 69,530 31,600 72,499 63,146 77,622 87,370 91,974 90,667 90,892 88,231 117,923 01600 EMEFGEICY& DIS?AIU-N 0 0 371,22) II01700 MA1N712NN� 1,0E5,549 1,334,422 1,279,857 1,367,567 1,5E8,425 1,632,635 1,883,034 1,863,757 1,867,031 2,064,163 1,936,924 2,004,230 2,010,334 01800 II CI'ICN&RRVE U S 74,971 102,633 144,653 136,535 155,334 178,070 165,519 183,247 162,614 0 0 0 IODDL 1,946,550 2,118,453 2,490,001 2,4513,703 2,611,144 2,973,337 3,151,125 3,233,663 3,339,8CQ 3,333,733 3,630,867 3,611,483 3,593,552 3,641,079 1 14 mommommemommemommemememememememem WATER UTILITY FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THOUSANDS CURRENT EARNINGS BOND RESERVES INCREASE •------- :•NY-1•:•!•!•-:!:::::!:::7 6-1 r"-•••* r I 14000 -- 1. 12. 1 1 1 .2 12000 •••, •••. r !iii� -•-•-•- ••�•�•� rn ••••• ••••�•• 10000 -- ••••• • 8. 1 8000 ;•,•,•; 5.9 ••••••� 5 6.2 6 :+.. 6000 5.0 5.3 +❖+•+ I-, 5.4 •••••= : %:::::' - --- •♦••• +•++ i+•+ ♦S.*14• +••. i••♦ •••' ••+. • ••♦ • 3.8 .•:::: ••+' :%V :+ ... V.V. :❖.+; +... ♦.•• --- •+.4000 . 1 ••••••, •••t+Ai .•+•••4 i+•+ 2000 ••••V••: ••••••! ::; • :r.;:: 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 immimmimmimmimmimmimmimmimmew AGE OF WATER UTILITY FACILITIES TREATMENT DISTRIBUTION STORAGE PUMPING PLANTS RESERVOIRS RESERVOIRS PLANTS ....wee.- r4W% now .7 1..6 v / [ / PERCENTAGE .5 OF SYSTEM t CONSTRUCTED .4 = .3 7 0 •. 2 i. / '' • i i li •...•*: •••• :.: 1 2 1_ ::: ....: ... 4. 1 a I 0 = -.- 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 YEAR Mil Mil Mil Mil Mil Mil MN MN INN me um um um um um um um um um AGE OF WATER UTILITY DEEP FACILITIES PUMP CONDUITS & MAINS & WELLS SUPPLY LINES HYDRANTS v / A .5 r .4 ►- CJ PERCENTAGE OF SYSTEM '3 CONSTRUCTED = ro .2 / 7 r Ii 0 17 1 IL 1 1E .z 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 YEAR II WATER UNLIT/ Rl.DD NO. 51 G.A.KE/EALL it/IDATIVE CAPITAL anC£r DI-ancaI ' CPPICN#2/RAIE INCREASE FCR RE FLSAL YEAR ENNIC JUDE 30, 1990 03/15/89 PAM 1 OF 5 RE3RVE ROR REtIR CCN RIRIPICIGS COST CLRRENr AND SEPLY LINES IN AID 10 RATE RESERVE FOR SEVER 'B3TAL II CENTER onnp CF9C2IPTICN FAIN/NUS CL1Y CfluR ONSERJCTICN 1N FA% ThERNENENIS LCWN CAPITAL I51-013D1-2710.10 LAND 51-03331-2710.10 IAND PR11A`g5 1,500,0n 1,500,000 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,500,030 1,500,000 51-01331-2710.30 FROM RI(ll5& RFPLY ' 51-03301-2710.30 N ThR 31CXX PLICHASES 30,OOD 30,000 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000' 51-01391-272D.20 IREATNINI PIPNES ' 51-00801-272D.20 EIS. SEI.3IIIC CIS-PARL&S 2J0,000 2CO,000 0 0 0 0 0 230,000 0 2G0,000 ' 51-01301-2720.35 E ING PLANCS AND FUT HINES 51-014J1-2720.35 6209 S JIH PUP S➢4TICII 60,OOD 60,000 II 60,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 60,000 ' 51-01301-2730.02 0LVERLS, ETIPFS, AND BRIDGES 51-03101-2730.02 REHIILD CEPII r IPRIGATICN FIDES 30,000 11,CCO I30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,030 51-013D1-2730.01 CND F{IV FELLS IS1-COW-MO.04 CALKER LASE FEU, 50,003 50,033 ' 50,030 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 I19 II NAIER WILEY FUND ND. 51 G.A.KFSII4LL 1FN1AIIVE CAPITAL HA'EC D1-HDGEV I CPTICN#WMTE INCREASE FC1 11E FL AL YEAR MAW Z3 JIN 30, 1990 03/1S/89 PACE 2OF5 RESERVE RR RESERVOIR CENIRIHNICNS II WET087ESS ORRINr AND SPPLY LINES IN AID 10 RATE RESERVE RP SFS'R 'i0PAL CENDR OCCE LE312IPTICN EARNMS CITY 01NfRY aSSITUCTICN IN FA% I:MOVEMENTS LOON CAPITAL I51-01 T1l 2730.05 0NDJrts& SPPLY LINES TANNR RESEWOIR 001111T 153,003 150,000 I - 150,033 0 0 0 0 0 0 150,000 51-0131-2730.07 DISIRIH1PICN RE31N01RS IONJ-III.LS SIR&LINE 350,000 350,000 ' 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 51-011ll-t/Jo.B DI RJHJIICN MAINS& LiYCFON S I RELIC WOWS Bois 100,000 100,000 WATER MAIN RFPLPfINFN1'9 a 32) 0 900 i SP- 2100 D)2000 31T111 14),000 140,000 I 2503 311II1-803 10 900 FE3T 42,000 42,000 300 E4Sr- 1700 73 2100 3171H 360,000 360,003 FRCFIIA11 ROAD-1E00 70 2)O0 NORTH 145,000 145,000 700 Nffi'- 1300 ID 210)SCUM 26,000 236,003 I 1300 1+E3r mIPLIIS 10 MEND AVE. 48,000 43,000 CAIIiFRItE Sr.-100QJ 10(XXI IIr1 AVE. 39,OOD 39A00 MX STREET-900 ID 1300 KEITH 163,000 16,030 I MIRE 3IIREFT- 1230 NRIIi 70[URNr AVE. 35,000 35,000 Elm.IM11PNP REPIA 11t IIS 30,000 30,000 NEW MAINLINE VALVES 23,000 20,000 ' DalkIn))LINES 100,000 100,000 VARIQIS LINES43,700 6,300 20,000 V),000 900 LVFSP- 2300 10 2500 31118 150,000 150,000 OM(OVER IR07EOI5 15)A00 150,000 1,456,700 6,300 33,000 103,000 300,000 0 0 1,883,000 ' FAIR UrILrrY ELrD D. 51 G.A.KEND4LL 11N1'Ar1VE CIPrrAL LIEGFT Ill-H3 P I rnriaN #2/RATE II4c9fAsE FcR The FIS;i4L yeAR Etlac JTJE 30, 1990 03/15/89 PAGE3cE5 FIE F R RamoiR QSIIRIHIriENS I COST 03ID_r aRRENr ADD SPPLY LIKES IN AID 1D RASE RESERVE FDR 9E1,ER Tom. CENTER (Tipp CES3 1Priaa E RNmi55 my COLN1Ry aaysnaJ3ricN i1SRFA. IrPRWEl1Erus MAN cCPrrAL FIAIER SHRIKE a21F1 Iac I 51-01701-2730.09 LARD rCIR RFPIALEMENIS 65,500 65,500 51-02201-2733.09 SERVICE LIRE RFPCAG I1S 223,730 270,220 500,000 I 51-02401-2733.03 SNAIL tE1ER pFcGRAm 421,203 421,2C0 51-03301-2733.03 Mk/gRVICE ca443CTICNs 135,000 135,000 I716,430 0 0 135,033 270,220 0 0 1,121,70Z) 51-01301-2750.10 AIAF)IOBRES&Tugs I51-02301-2750.10 2-3/4 MN 4 x 4 25,000 25,030 51-0M-2750.10 1- 1 1CN FE[rFR FLATBEr/.3/4 4X4 12,500 12,500 51-02301-2750.10 3-10411EFL rncs 193,000 193,000 ' 51-0701-2750.10 2-1 1U V& H 04,000 84,000 51-02301-2750.10 2-1 RN ELMS 30,030 30,000 I343,530 0 0 0 0 0 0 349,500_ 51-011 N-2750.30 FIELD t'kIFIr Bcri1FttNr-FDTIVE I51-02301-2750.30 3-BACIICES 150,500 150,500 150,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 153,500 I51-01331-2760.10 Fuci/G HAW EQUIRIIar I51-00401-2760.10 2-SOLID SI ARI ERB0 A/C F0ICR 23,0a0 23,030 5140401-27E0.10 1-200EP A[77 ERHD DRIVE PII1CR crNna Jg ia,000 18,000 51-05101-2760.10 1-Zap SLID SIFT BIDU:ID 1(f.TlGE:DIM S1SRlFR 6,030 6,003 I - 52,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,000 I I21 I ' ;ATER 1JtIL 1Y FUND NJ. 51 G.A.KENDALL 1FNIATIVE CAPITAL BUM. Dl-HDCEC I (PTICN#?/RATE INCREASE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1990 C0/15/89 PAGE 4CF5 RESERVE RR RESERVOIR ONIRLHJi1(NS ' 073C 08JEIT 0 RRENP AND SM'Lx LINES IN AID ID RATE RESERVE FOR SEAM TRAL CENTER OlDF•' DE332IPPI(N FARVECS (SPY Q UNTRY CCNSIFUCTICN DXRFASE I ERNEW II'S LOAN CAPITAL 51-01111-2760.20 1RFAIINENT PLANT EIJIRMENI II51-00801-276J.20 PAIYEY'S(BOILER REPAIR) 5,033 5,CO3 51-00301-2760.2D PARLEY'S(FIFATINS MIEN 11 ) 1,003 1,000 ' 51-00901-27E0.20 1-RI WEER 1,800 1,800 51-OB)1-2760.20 8- FRILIER( ISLES& VALV(PERArIN (TSIIIYYB 40,000 40,000 ' 47,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 47,800 51-01 1[11-27G0.30'IFIII�Y RJllR ' 51-01501-2760.30'1439maERI G 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,000 ' 51-01101-2760.50 OFFICE ELRC1LFRE& [300iPEEPIP 51-01331-27E0.50 1-PERSDVAL Q7WU1 RS WASS 7,000 7,03D II 51-02201-27E0.50 1-P[RSN4L 4?HIIII7S I/ASSY 7,000 7,000 51-02701-275050 1-LAIR PRINTER 5,000 5,000 51-02301-27E0.50 1-CA3i REXIISRR-hIIQO CC /1FR& PRINTER 7,400 7,400 ' 51-0001-2760.50 1-PER.4114L O.TRIifRS W/AS L 7,000 7,0(70 51-03321-Z7E0.50 2- SOFAS(RR BREAK R7CMS) 1,C89 1,069 ' 34,439 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,439 I I I22 ' FA11R UPILr1Y RPD NJ. 51 G.A_KEN A L ^�. TENTATIVE CAPITAL HDCfr' Dl-RI T I OPTION#?/RATE IN3 AI ECR ILE FITAL YEAR ENDING ME 33, 1990 03/15/89 PAGES OF5 RE90(VE RR RESERVOIR 03II3IHJIICSS ' Ctllr 087NDP CPRENC AND 31PP[Y LINES IN AID TO RATE IEEERVE RJR EE1493 TOME CNNIER crrF IESCRIPPICN EARNINGS CITY =TRY OCNEERLLTICN %CREA9 INPRXE J 2S LCAN CAPITAL 51-01T1-2760.90 QD1fR N23-M3TIVE ECUIRTNT II51-00101-27E0.90 1-CIFIC SV(BR.31 Cfl 4IJS J AI #33R-NX)-34500 R3S) 550 550 51-00101-2760.90 1- H4131 CLIPPER 18,033 18,000 ' 51-00101-2760.90 1-tLE LIMP 2 FIT CN EXCVIR TO LFr 11a.SIMPS MDL 1D27N 2,950 2,950 51-00101-2760.90 2-PRO TOOL SECS 2,935 2,935 51-00101-2760.90 1- 12,003 LB. NARK NIININ& E MPER KIT 1,075 1,075 II51-0 RRFA 0101-2760.90 1-3,000 HEI BCE HEATER CRAI 3E 393 1,255 1,255 51-00301-27E0.90 1-F1R'TRIC VALVE/ AIIOR 12 INCH 1,700 1,700 51-CCE01-2760.90 1-12,000 LB. W'11 4INEH& ELM ER KIT 1,000 1,000 51-O0901-2760.90 1-EIICIRIC VALVE CPERAIrR 36 INCH 9,000 9,000 ' 51-01301-2760.90 1-WTIMI AIR CLNDrriCNER(D. ANCERECN OFFICE) 1,000 1,000 51-01131-27E0.90 1-GECGRAFHICAL INFO S(SIEN AND CND SYSTEM 42,003 42,000 51-01431-2760.90 1-AIR M43C WAS& 1,605 1,605 I51-01401-2760.90 1-EIELIFLEX MA EITC WOOER 725 725 51-01E01-2 OM 2-NECAL CELffiQ2S 1,400 1,400 51-01701-2760.90 7-CA'P MCCEL S 2 TAMERS 11,865 11,865 51-01701-278J.90 2-ML(R7ID11 22)LC�ATC S 990 990' 51-01701-2760.90 5-HAE ITE H3 1500 GENERAERS 3,300 3,300 51-01701-2760.90 2-MUM cur OFF S4W5 1,32D 1,320 51-01701-27E0.90 1-EL-500 B PAVER(BASIC) 11,500 11,500 ' 51-02101-2760.90 3-MEAL S1DRP1£CABINEIS 2,103 2,100 51-02201-27E0.90 1-(17B ND NITER WEE NAL.T 1701 CRCUTIER 525 525 51-O22J1-27E0.90 1-ME`AF COIFING BAND SAW MODEL ys.p 12 INCH 7,500 7,500 ' 51-07201-2760.90 1-TMS&LRIIL CtIM R NLL>EL FA!1/8 TO 2 1/2 BIT SUE 2,700 2,700 51-0?A)1-2760.90 1-1'0ER maim it r N]I 1 1/2& 2 DEN 6,500 6,500 51-(Q401-27E0.90 1-NATER Nffit TE9r BENCH 5/8& 3/4 INCH 5,500 5,500 51-0M-27E0.9)1-OVERHEAD CANE(EIBImIC FERE ROPE Cam) 1,703 1,7C0 II 51-025)1-2760.90 2-ELECTRICAL TEST IIYLRI'FITS 1,200 1,270 51-032)1-2760.90 1-(35kD ER 1,500 1,500 51-032)1-2760.90 1-26 BICH 1T1 IISLCN 700 700 1 144,095 0 0 0 0 0 0 144,095 ' TOTAL CAPITAL 3,636,564 6,300 23,000 235,000 570,220 203,000 1,5LD,000 6,1E8,034 I 23 PUBLIC UTILITIES 01/JIM WATER UTILITY FUND SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 REMAINING SIZE FIVE YEAR PORTION DEPARTMENT / PROJECT OF FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS PUBLIC UTILITIES LINE 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL NOT INCLUDED TREATMENT PLANTS IMPROVEMENTS TO PARLEY'S PLANT 200,000 200,000 8,200,000 BIG COTTONWOOD INTAKE STRUCTURE 0 300,000 BIG COTTONWOOD PLANT IMPROVEMENT 150,000 150,000 300,000 1,000,000 CITY CREEK PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 0 2,050,000 MILL CREEK PLANT (NEW) 200,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 2,400,000 DAMS AND RESERVIORS LAKE MARY'S DAM 0 250,000 MOUNTAIN DELL DAM 0 500,000 TWINLAKES DAM 50,000 50,000 ry OAK HILLS RESERVOIR AND 'LINE 350,000 350,000 4. ENSIGN DOWNS RESERVOIR 750,000 750,000 1,500,000 45TH SOUTH RESERVOIR AND LINE 0 1,700,000 MORRIS RESERVOIR AND PUMP 250,000 250,000 PUMP STATIONS EAST BENCH RUMP STATION 10,000 10,000 62ND SOUTH PUMP STATION 60,000 60,000 WELLS AND WATER SOURCES WALKER LANE WELL 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 EMIGRATION TUNNEL 235,000 235,000 ARTESIAN BASIN WELL 75,000 75,000 RED BUTTE CANYON WELL (NEW) 0 270,000 RE-HAB EXISTING WELL 19TH EAST 75,000 75,000 HIGHLAND DRIVE 39TH SOUTH WELL (NEW WELL) 0 270,000 CULVERTS FLUMES & BRIDGES HIGHLAND DRIVE IRRIGATION FLUME 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 JORDAN & SALT LAKE CANAL 50,000 50,000 PUBLIC UTILITIES D1/JIM WATER UTILITY FUND SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 REMAINING SIZE FIVE YEAR PORTION DEPARTMENT / PROJECT OF FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS PUBLIC UTILITIES LINE 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL NOT INCLUDED WATER CONDUITS & SUPPU ' LINES TANNER RESERVOIR 150,000 150,000 SUNNYSIDE CONDUIT 0 600,000 3RD EAST 17TH SOUTH TO 21ST S 30 225,000 225,000 3RD EAST 33RD SOUTH TO ARTESIAN 36 0 1,174,635 3RD EAST FROM MARCUS TO ARTESIAN 36 0 1,732,500 70TH SOUTH TO PROMENADE TO 13TH 24 0 1,700,000 21ST SOUTH 4400 WEST TO 5600 W 36 0 675,000 CALIFORNIA GLADIOLA TO PIONEER 30 350,000 350,000 CALIFORNIA REDWOOD TO MO WEST 30 0 700,000 900 WEST 2100 TO 2500 SOUTH 12 140,000 140,000 2500 SOUTH 900 TO 900 WEST 42,000 42,000 300 EAST 1700 TO 2100 SOUTH 360,000 360,000 FRONTAGE ROAD 1600 TO 2000 NORTH 12 145,000 145,000 700 WEST 1300 TO 2100 SOUTH 286,000 286,000 1300 WEST ILLINCIS TO MEAD AVE 6 48,000 48,000 ry CATHERINE ST 1000 N TO GOODWIN 6 39,000 39,000 ol BECK STREET 900 TO 1300 NORTH 12 168,000 168,000 OAKLEY STREET 1200 NORTH /DUPONT 6 35,000 35,000 BECK STREET 1300 N 2200 N 12 463,968 463,968 EASTWOOD DRIVE 3680 TO 3750 E 8 26,334 26,334 EASTWOOD DRIVE 3370 TC 3660 S 6 99,598 99,598 1200 NORTH 'VICTORIA TC COLORADO 6 119,814 119,814 1000 NORTH COLORADO TO CATHERINE 6 25,878 25,878 LOUISE AVENUE 2700 E VALLEY ST 6 147,934 147,934 DELSA DRIVE 2703 E 2835 E 6 33,478 33,478 VENUS DRIVE 25C0 E/MORNINGSTAR 6 47,348 47,348 VALLEY STREET METRO-WAY TO 3300S 6 34,162 34,162 2400 SOUTH 900 WEST TO 800 W 12 53,838 53,838 WARR ROAD WASATCH BLVO/CASCADE 6 30,932 30,932 MONTGOMERY STREET 1300 S/GLENDAL 6 59,280 59,280 AMERICAN AVE CHEYENNE TO PUEBLO 6 24,966 24,966 METROPOLITAN WAY VALLEY/GREGSON 4 53,048 53,048 MT OLYMPUS BARBARA WAY/FOUBERT 4 35,264 35,264 EVELYN DRIVE GARY ROAD TO RUTH 4 72,466 72,466 500 WEST 1200 SOUTH TO 1100 S 6 70,870 70,870 PUBLIC WORK PROJECTS 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 VALVES 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 140,000 DONATED LINES 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 VARIOUS WATER LINES 104,266 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 704,266 CLEAN TRANSMISSION MAINS 100,000 100,000 CARRY OVER / 900 WEST-2300 SOUTH 150,000 150,000 CARRY OVER /700 WEST 1300 SOUTH 150,000 150,000 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES 01/JIM WATER UTILITY FUND SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 REMAINING SIZE FIVE YEAR PORTION DEPARTMENT / PROJECT OF FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS PUBLIC UTILITIES LINE 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL NOT INCLUDED OTHER IMPROVEMENTS REPLACEMENT OF CANYON TOILETS 0 500,000 GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND CADD SYSTEM 50,000 50,000 200,000 EMERGENCY GENERATOR FOR SHOPS 75,000 75,000 SERVICE CONNECTIONS SMALL METER PROGRAM 421,200 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 721,200 NEW SERVICES 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 675,000 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 400,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,400,000 2,500,000 LARGE METER RERPLACEMENT 65,500 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 465,500 N a' OTHER EQUIPMENT WATER STOCK 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 LAND PURCHASES 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,500,000 CULVERTS FLUMES & BRIDGES 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000 TRUCKS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT 500,000 400,000 350,000 500,000 350,000 2,100,000 PUMPING EQUIPMENT 52,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 172,000 TELEMETERING 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 95,000 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT 47,800 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 167,800 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 44,318 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 144,318 OTHER EQUIPMENT 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,168,084 4,030,302 4,033,224 3,939,038 3,961,614 22,132,262 38,096,440 L SEWER SL54ER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND I PROJECTED OPERATING STATEMENT FOR YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1989 AND 1990 ' PROPOSED PROJECTED PROPOSED ACTUAL A9iNINENI' ACRIALS BUDGET RESOJI81ES 1987-88 1988-89 1988-89 1989-90 I Revenues — Sales &Charges for Services Old Rate $ 5,409,305 $ 5,358,500 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,800,000 I 1981 Rate Increase 967,0.53 954,300 996,000 996,000 201 Rate Increase 4,1.?I.773 4,136,000 3,800,000 3,100,000 Interest 1,510,634 1,200,000 1,674,000 1,674,000 I $12,027,825 $11,648,800 $11,270,000 $10,570,000 Other Sources Other Revenue $ 947,376 $ 1,669,100 $ 1,302,300 $ 1,302,300 Aid to Construction I Private _ 691,471 0- -0- 0 Total Other Sources $ 1,38,847 $ 1,669,100 $ 1,302,300 $ 1,302,300 I7CYAL RESCURC S $13,666,672 $13,317,900 $12,572,300 $11,872,300 USES 1 Expenditures Cost of Sales & Service: Pimping $ 217,412 $ 258,159 $ 220,740 $ 280,508 11 Collection 1,0.59.708 1,169,1.57 1,102,469 1,078.222 Reclamation 2.768,536 3,122,668 2,914,711 3,194,465 Custaner Service 1 & Collection 799,806 840,132 879,571 843,043 Total Sales & Service $ 4,845,462 $ 5,390,116 $ 5,117,491 $ 5,396,238 General &Administrative $ 668,299 $ 708.994 $ 739,848 $ 716,530 ' Total Gen. &Adjnin. $ 668,299 $ 708,994 $ 739,848 $ 716,530 Debt Service $ 695,923 $ 701,300 $ 701,300 $ 701,300 ICapital Expenditures 5,590,927 16,199,616 9,149,616 14,876,650 Total Capital & Debt Service $ 6,286_850 $16,900,916 $ 9,850,916 $15,577,950 I TOTAL USES $11,800,611 $23,000,026 $15,708,255 $21,690,718 ' Excess Revenue And Sources Over (Under) Uses $ 1,866,061 (9,682,126) (3,135„955) (9,818,418) ' Operating Cash Balances Beginning July 1 $16,908,689 $18,774,750 $15,638,795 Ending June 30 18,774,750 15,638,795 5,820,377 I Operating cash balance is defined as total cash less restricted amounts for bond covenants and outstanding accounts payable. I DI Reports 27 I PLELIC UTILITIES-a34,14 RID 01 81IIII-33ER I 9943R 0PNCEMENE RENDUS YFAPS 7/01-4'33'821141171 6/3390 02/22/69 7,12104. P111NL, ALMA. ACRIAL N11AL PETAL 'VAAL WSTIMGIN) stair YEAR GQ+9(3) l443( ) I ACR1742 F13AL YEAR VIRAL YEAR F1)311 YEAR Ex8IA.YEAR Fl371 YEAR P13A[.YEAR FINAL YEAR E1.lN.YEAR AVMYIE 1T-91Y, Ix 1R - N0 P011xr 11112 1911-82 1982-83 193384 1934.85 1985.86 19)6-87 1937-83 19 389 1932+H CR 190990 UFRAT71•G RE1kE11.5 I 1651 SE1ER OA ESaD PATE S,IffJ,766 4,830,532 4,663,993 4,640,327 5071,024 5,646,265 4,770,031 4,860,000 4,345,L33 459bb7 4,80),OW c 1654 34E3)31+WlE 122,510 )84,930 146,777 110,`171 137,870 137,713 243,031 160,03) 141,636 18,714 1F0,070 1655 3'01AL A]4)}3FN1S3NR 415869 764,072 342,663 364,732 354,793 52,305 39,374 250,063 3.`i1,721 -101,721 250,01) c 1210 134S3:1103-317462 131+1115 27,015 21,945 41,456 5292 41,135 331123 79,1190 32033 31,E 751 32.010 1430 FICIEELRIEG EE35 0 5,642 19,321 0 0 `CO 7(13 SW 3,279 -2,7A 930 I 1472 SALE OF PE31!<E 23,02) 2),03) 27 A)U 23,W0 2),OJ) 0 0 0 12,500 -12,`13) 0 1955 INIIE7'fl14)F4iIMQ24kQ7r 223A33 147,4(70 1�,56b 3(i,150 23,707 31,176 (33,4Cb A,000 d7 A52 -17,052 70,000 r3 1)831 06131)PNDIL 8,000 12,000 11,100 430 0 0 0 0 3,935 -3,933 0 16113 REPAIR 6 1E1033103 21,437 10,0)6 36,877 143,234 174,643 114,271 106,061 105,0:0 75,905 23,035 1E6,000 I 1653 385)1431.WYES 4,956 5,74) 10,815 11,715 10,185 6,d11 5,760 7,A3 6,9913 `.U2 7.500 1661 FT+1r1RFAII6Nr OWiFS 0 22,E03 33,134 25,336 32,100 45,494 31,937 33,360 23,219 15,031 38,303 1657 :k1+R CCELE1.101 FEES 20,4A 414,501 001,614 450,8>7 XA,418 796b94 119b30 133,Of0 D1,786 -161,786 130,00) 1833 INIEN=118328 425,223 433,620 665,135 735,630 744010 553,317 753,817 837,033 536,072 330,923 637,603 1890 31936(93332+10 1,333 1,933 2,613 16,134 4,9% 25,121 11,743 10,000 7,991 2,03) 10,030 I10031,(384,031E0 6,711,533 6,933,703 67543,37 - 6,668,4% 6352,642 7,36E068 6,432,0% 6,440,370 5,918,523 5211,772 6,443,360 N34-CP RAEI G MIMES I 1651-011931 WE IELIfAg 631,543 772,587 913b78 9ll,259 lA®:0,44J 1024,333 1,030,9� 996A03 796,845 273,Lfi `A6.000 1653 Sri WE IN1I3A9: 0 1,233,559 5,3)2,56 5,273,663 5,0 ,862 3,733,013 4,131,773 3,860A .3 00 31,6A 8,321 3,100,00J a,c,e,f 1653 3'FCIPL AGREE.231 681E DC. 0 99,165 417,931 434,209 324,02) 466,207 255,467 20,033 243,374 -�,374 700,000 a,c,e,f 1653 31,F74 0344.3E35>3)1 PATE INC. 0 81,339 335,033 722,347 523,727 623,760 266,735 359,033 319,323 -33,333 239,000 1842 8731746 7 SALES 6,520 Eel 5,181 14,925 25,241 14,721 0 10,m] 8,535 1,465 10,070 I 1)330 143313 43-7l 6816 0 0 0 736,932 776,764 989,476 759b17 877AN 352,865 434,135 837,000 b 183) 11IIf33r I3a002ffi•.ELM 2,143 614,564 344,1� L98,935 63,725 0 0 0 152,903 -152,903 0 1970 REZONE R3R IMfOVF 9315 1,853,375 1,93E1,033 445,030 1,604,493 7,020,459 4,567,142 4,445,454 3,135,955 2,666,236 7,152,182 9,818,4111 1350 CCNIFU91710-e.PA.(RANTS 66,943 366,696 0 0 37,434 0 0 0 93,7E6 -93•7E 0 I 1910 AID 10 61311R01ICN-PItIYK1E 2D,731 0 d1,561 0 173,372 0 33B,ID1 0 84,189 �q,18I1 0 [LPN EFPFYEEMWE9>Qd•fE7D 4,371 3,231 0 0 0 0 0 0 956 -96G 0 SALE OF INV.10 FA717E OFPC. S1All 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,376 -6.316 0 ILM 43R0(37422 0 1,933,361 1,530,719 1,433,907 1,723,441 0 0 0 823,433 -823,423 0 I10121 140JQ'E682 : 2,641,24 7,104,237 9,365,795 10,7)2,331 16,696,533 10,915,59T 11,333,357 9,267,955 8,606,52 6,644319 15,250,418 10031.MAKES 9,352,823 13,943,056 15,901b92 17,460,786 23,533,175 18,222,366 17,825,421 15,703,255 14,524,057 7,166,661 21,603,718 ' -- a AVENGE YEAR Is tram CN 5.25 YEARS b A337811I YEAR IS 11.0ED 01 4)FAILS c Ik1;8NING JINX 1, 1916 1FIIAL POLLEEE4r l0i INI318*14N OF 01)W IS IEING BILLED 0311E OM41 31 13 AlD)1TIQY4.01.4142S 10 1W1ER GEM'.3Qi 03Mr 048Y I e 231 RAIL 0134149C 336 1996-87(17%11R1939>101P1.11931 EEO I 14430&1)201 RAM IkI1FL OF 144 190.89(6%1k133A,E 101A1.114R FEE) I I28 mmommimmilmiimimmlimmmimmImmomm SEWER UTILITY OPERATING COMPARISON IN THOUSANDS VARIABLE SALARIES UTILITIES CITY CHARGES SERVICES -:-X•:**:•:•:*:•:•:•:•:* F.7)M + / , 1. i ' 9000 1- 8000 f i N 7000 t 5.9 6. 1 6000 r-� I 5.5 53 5.4 5.5 �-,77 , 4.7 T 5. 1 5. 1 fl , •?•.• ••: •:. tis: 2000 �- :: w • •: : : :' `s': 1000 -.:.; • .•.: ' 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 YEAR PhtCRA 1 1311ILET CHANGES SANER UT I l,1YY MIND I . LIFT STATIONS The operations and nra i nt enance budget has decreased due to the on going program of upgrading our sanitary sewer lift stations fran submersible to wet well -dry well stations. ' 2. COLLECTION SYSTEM This progran's operation and maintenance budget has been decreased due to budgeting at a level of the previous two years ' actual and has eliminated . 80 of a full time personnel position and one-half of one hourly Inspector. These positions are no longer required due to new technology. 3. RECLAMATION PLANT This program is continuing to monitor and evaluate the operations of the plant to cut costs where applicable and still ' maintain a high level of productivity and service. This past year we have eliminated one full time position. Operation costs increased due to the increase costs of sludge processing and odor ' control . 41. Cl/STOVER SERVICE ' The continuing monitoring and evaluation of costs and productivity provide an efficient operation of this progran. 5. SEWER ALYvII N I STRAT IO'd ' This program has increased due to the addition of our new personnel representative position this past year, and an increase in administrative fees. I I I 1)1-Reports 30 Ell ION OM Ell OM OM Ell IIIIII OM OM NM IIIII Ell Ell IIIIN SIM NMI Ell SEWER UTILITY FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THOUSANDS BOND CURRENT EARNINGS 18000 16000 - 14.9 14000 - 13. 1 W / 12000 - 10000 9. 1 8000 6 8.6 .4 52 6000 / 0 4. . . 4000 31 33 2. 1 z000 0 / _A. / 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR I ' EIDC£P RECAP SEVER UTILITY RN) D1/HID(EP-AVER IFI3AL YEAR 1989- 1990 02/22/89 PAGE 1(F2 1989 1990 I R EEC APPR. PAFQ' FULL PART FULLACTUAL HDGII' EMI:MALED REED a vT no. TIAE TIME TIME TIME 1987-1988 1938-1939 L938-1939 1939-1990 DIE-FEMME PEKENIDGE ISALARIES& MINCE LEVEE-US 522)LIFT 4rATICKS .00 6.00 .00 6.00 159,256 174,359 165,735 206,203 31,&B 0.1827 ' 523)aTnrrICN 1931EM 30.63 .18 29 80 865,173 913,532 897,795 835,067 -78,465 -0.0359 5E0 E i&TICK PLANT .E02A0 61.00 2.00 (0.0) 1,946,610 2,003,254 1,793,384 2,002,733 -515 -0.Cm3 5230 C1S1C*1 SERVICE .CO 5.00 .00 5.00 141,541 143,432 152,811 146,643 3,211 0.0224 ' 5290 SEVER ACHNISIRATIQN 00 4.90 .00 5.00 209 871 263„451 232,235 209,225 -54,226 -0.2058 5295 E[1H IC UfIL1TIFS AGM. OD 1.00 .00 1.00 48,066 50,4� 49,820 50,420 -8 -0.0002 II4)8 101%-PE1190IAL SERVICES 2.6 108.10 2.18 106.80 3,2E,517 3,543,456 3,291,780 3,450,302 -99,154 -0.0277 CPERATII G E PEDDEURES' 5227 LIFT 30 TICDIS 59,156 83,800 55,C05 74,300 -9,500 -0.1134 5233 CalE78103 Sis11l 194,535 255,625 24,674 243,155 -12,470 -0.0438 ' 5260 RE)SPIMT223 RPM SERVICE921,926 1,119,414 1,121,327 1,191,726 72,312 0.0646 658,265 �6,700 726,7W 696,400 -3� -0.0004 5290 SBFR ADIRI 8iRATICf1 403,510 393,990 455,940 455,7E 61,770 0.15E ' 5295 PUELIC UPILrrIFS ACM. 1,852 1,125 1,853 1,125 0 0.0000 S18 ICMAL 17CNS 2,244,244 2,550,664 2,565,559 2,662,466 111,812 0.0433 II 10114L PERS)IAL B3RIICE&CPER. 5,513,761 6,039,110 5,957,33) 6,112,7E8 13,6E8 O.lro7 I II ' 31 ' WIDGET RECAP SEAER UTILITY FUN) WILD GE-93 ER FISCAL YEAR 1939- 1990 02-22-89 PAGE 2OF2 II BDC£T APPR. ACTUAL ROGET E4TIMALIED RBX7ESTND BUDGET ND. 1937-1988 1988-1939 1988-1999 1999-1990 DIFFERENCE PERCENFIGE IICAPITAL EWIPEADTIURES II FIIVNCED-Q7 ENr EA131I&S 513,102 832,490 634,661 337,532 -434,993 -0.5946 FINAIVOEI�EE 4,893,655 9,652,12E 3,135,955 9,818,4113 136,292 0.0141 FIN D-aN)PROCEEDS 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 FINANC D-1931 RAZE INC. 0 253,000 253,00D 294,700 41,700 0.0030 II FINANCED-21 RATE INC. 179,170 5,432,000 5,126,000 4,426,000 -1,(06,000 -0.1852 FII34[ PRIVATE OSIT. 0 0 0 0 0 0.0000 tS-TOTALCAPTIAL EXPEND. 5,590,927 16,199,616 9,149,616 14,876,650 -1,322,966 -0.C817 ' caw REV-MINI BOND PRII30TPAL 240,451 253,100 253,100 253,100 0 0.0000 II =Tsar 455,472 443,200 448,20D 443,200 0 0.0000 SJ8-1DTAL DEEP RETIRE. 695,923 701,300 701,3:0 701,300 0 0.0000 I ' 701AL BDG T 11,800,611 23,000,026 15,703,255 21,690,718 -1,309,303 -0.0583 I I ' 32 I PU3LIC urlLrrlFs- SEVER UTILITY REG Dl/ - • OPERATING©IIEND -CaPAERISON 02-22.89 FOR PERIOD 7/]J82 TH12135 61/30/90 IPc1UAL AMC ACTUAL AC GAL AERIAL PCIIAL ,c1UP, 8JD[ElED ESIIMI D RBJJEM1D FISCAL YEAR FL9:AL YEAR FISCAL YEAR EZcalI YEAR FISUS,YEAR FISCAL YEAR FIXAL.YEAR FETAL YEAR FIXAL YEAR FI.R'AI YEAR APPE FRIAT1a,-Oasr CENTER 1931-82 1932-83 1953,54 1954-85 1955-86 1966.87 1957,58 1938-89 1933-89 1939-90 II522)LIFT SIY2IQ1S I10100 LIFT SDNIICNS 140,726 335,628 202,940 233,380 217,765 210,894 217,412 295,199 220,740 260,503 523)CIiL FC1ICN SY31IT1 I 10300❑RAFTRC&OFFICE ENS. 521419 940556 104,245 106,743 103,623 119,874 0 0 0 0 a 10400 SURVEY& FIELD ENS. 87 851 87,957 66,221 14,923 73,824 88,241 334,303 334,5C9336,417 351,834 a 10600 COLLECTION LAWS 438,134 536,064 503,635 449,717 544,226 430,638 485,744 526,240 514,883 456,478 I 10703 SYSIIIrIS II2S?FL7GFS 112,671 118,634 1�,517 85,757 136,910 142,519 0 0 0 0 a 1030D MJBIIE CAEFRA IN I18831 197r756 214,836 182r501 2�r085 233,186 163,673 152,463 164,4Cb 162,707 160,780 11000 F1 Er MAINr.COIL.. SYS. 223,954 211,970 176,938 211,639 83,010 33,467 87,193 94,020 85,457 109,13D I1,116,241 1,264,317 1,162A57 1,095,914 1,179,779 1,053,468 1,059,703 1,1E9,157 1,102,469 1,0 3,222 52E0 RECIAMATICN FEW II1110D 1.ABOMECRI T3aUW4 0 13,523 22,027 20,522 122,632 107,147 155,035 273,135 226,679 271,316 11200 VVIIBINANCE 2,414,133 2,843,037 2,623,130 2,502,160 2,2E0,017 7830835 885,556 1,172,812 925,897 935,729 II 1130DAMINISTRKTIEN 183,195 233,230 262,818 223,763 133,493 176,781 214,531 234,367 220,024 263,732 12200 CI�EFATi(NS 0 0 0 0 155,957 1,745,466 1,407,865 1,345,214 1,453,111 1,567,798 12330 REI7:AETATICN FLEET MZNT. 0 0 0 0 72,793 49,590 75,439 97,139 89,000 96,890 I2,597,378 3,194,795 2,912,975 2,751,445 2,794,907 2,867,819 2,7E8,536 3,122,6E8 2,914,711 3,194,465 524)CIJ910EER SERVICE&ACCIG. I11400 CUSE1 R S:RIICE 172,415 344,269 379,775 403,029 472,543 523,811 724,635 766,216 810,346 771,643 11500 A03JlNT1N1 33,8% 39,974 41,271 46,442 50,697 44,83 60,171 73,916 69,225 71,200 I236,271 394,243 421,046 454,471 523,240 573,649 799,806 840,132 879,571 843,043 I tPUELIC UTILITIES-93+FR urmrry RN) 01/H n rg1+FR CPERATINU E)Q?EbD17LRFS-ODPARI3N 02-22439 RR PFRItfl 7/1/82 TEICU3-1 6/33/90 I ACIIIAL PCRIAL ACR]AL AC1Li<L XILUAL AP1UTAL A(3 JAL EUJZIED F rl WIFD FEJJESIED FISCAL YEAR FLR'AL YEAR ELM%YEAR FIS'AL YEAR FL9CAL YEAR FL9:'AL YEAR 11S L AFAR FLTAL YEAR FIXAL YEAR EY8:4L YEAR APPFCP1IAT1a-QDEC CENTER 1931 82 1432-83 1933-84 1934-85 L935-86 1936-87 1937-88 1939-89 1988-89 1989-90 ' 52S0 SENER AIEBNISIRATIGN 11t00 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES W,416 78,163 76,174 93,170 110,014 129,934 183,235 170,718 206,970 194,175 ' 11700 GENERAL WU TICt3S 275,332 63,933 92,411 134,5W 144,526 253,664 219,780 7179,143 271,205 233,810 344,793 142,071 103,935 232,739 254,543 333,253 431,935 379,893 478,175 433,985 I5230 R18[SC UTILITIES Nil. 11900 AL NS1?ATICN 18,766 45,063 46,W7 43,254 50,338 47,237 43,918 51,553 51,673 51,545 I (I NB IHTTICN TD GENERAL RN) 226,796 171,734 162,039 175,0:6 201,020 170,356 183,1W 210,000 210,000 231,000 ' RE3RVE ELR 00L131FLL AOUNIS 54,239 67,422 31,352 W,463 79,602 57,923 33,237 0 0 0 CUITINGEECIES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67,593 0 0 ' (RAND 1CJ24L 4,705,276 5,475,253 5,107,621 5,060,672 5,3)1,251 5,393,633 5,513,761 6,093,110 5,857,339 6,112,7t8 ' a aging July 1, 1987 Crafting, Eh7ineering&Sxvey rave all been mdbina3 into 0bst(Inter 10400. 1 I 34 II ' SEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 1 OF 6 FOR FISCMT YEAR 1989-1990 I 201 TOTAL IMPLEM COST OBJECT CURRENT RESERVE FOR 1981 ENTATICN CAPITAL CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET 1 BUILDINGS 52-11701 2720 ADMINISTRATION BLDG. ADDITION $500,000 $500,000 ' $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000 ILIFT STATIONS 52-10101 2720.05 BILLY MITCHELL STATION UPGRADE $50,000 $50,000 52-10101 2720.05 PIONEER ROAD UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 II 52-10101 2720.05 AIRPORT STAT. 4000 W.N.TEMPLE 25,000 25,000 52-10101 2720.05 BONNEVILLE STAT. UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 52-10101 2720.05 1805 INDEPENDENCE BLVD. ROSE PARK( CARRY OVER) 20,000 20,000 I 52-10101 2720.05 NORTHWEST QUADRANT LIFT STATION (CARRY OVERY) 500,000 500,000 52-10101 2720.05 4130 SOUTH & CENTENNIAL PARK (CARRY OVER) 50,000 50,000 52-10101 2720.05 350 NORTH & 4800 WEST (CARRY OVER) 50,000 50,000 I $0 $765,000 _N_NMY $0 $0$0 _ $765,000 II I I I II ' 36 ISEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 2 OF 6 I FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 201 TOTAL COST OBJECT CURRENT RESERVE FOR 1981 IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET ITREATMENT PLANT I 52-11201 2720.30 MODIFICATION CHLORINATION SYS. $50,000 $50,000 52-11201 2720.30 SERVICE WATER FILTRATION 10,000 10,000 52-11201 2720.30 FREEWAY IRRIGATION DEMO. 125,000 125,000 52-11201 2720.30 IMPROV. PRIMARY SCUM REMOVAL 50,000 50,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 IMPROVEMENTS TO INFLUENT GATE 25,000 AT PRETREATMENT PLANT 25,000 52-11201 2720.30 REPLACE GRIT SCREW-MAIN PLANT 25,000 25,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 CORRECT ROOF TIE PROBLEMS FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION 100,000 103,000 52-11201 2720.30 EARTHQUAKE LIQUEFATION STUDY 50,000 50,E I 52-11201 2720.30 IMPROVEMENT TO PROTECT FACILITY FROM EARTHQUAKE 50,000 50,000 52-11201 2720.30 PRETREATMENT PLANT FUEL TANK 200,000 200,000 MODIFICATIONS 10,000 10,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 FUEL SYSTEM CONTROL FOR ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM - UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 52-11201 2720.30 SLUDGE DRYING BEDS IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 2,000,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT 300,000 300,000 52-11201 2720.30 EXPANDING SLUDGE MANAGE. PROGRAM 10,000 10,000 52-11201 2720.30 ODOR CONTROL FOR SLUDGE THICKENERS 4,000 96,000 100,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 DIGESTER MODIFICATIONS 10,000 10,000 52-11201 2720.30 SITE CURBING 15,000 15,000 52-11201 2720.30 EMERGENCY BYPASS PUMPING 200,000 200,000 52-11201 2720.30 RAG DEWATERING PRETREAT. PLANT 30,000 30,000 I 52-11201 2720.30 ENGINEERING FOR SLUDGE BEDS (CARRY OVER) 120,000 120,000 52-11201 2720.30 ENGINEERING FOR MAINT. BLDG. (CARRY OVER) 30,000 30,000 52-11201 2720.30 REHAB MAINT. STOREHOUSE AND I ADDITION TO LABORATORY (CARRY OVER) 500,000 500,000 52-11201 2720.30 SITE CURBING (CARRY OVER ) 15,000 15,000 52-11201 2720.30 DIGESTER VENTILATION (CARRY OVER) 25,000 25.000 I 52-11201 2720.30 COVER GRIT CHANNEL (CARRY OVER) 50,000 50,000 52-11201 2720.30 INFLUENT GATE MODIFICATION (CARRY OVER) 25,000 25.000 52-11201 2720.30 FIBERGLASS GRATING 15,000 15,000 52-11201 2720.30 FAN HOUSE RADIATOR 10,000 10,000 I $0 $2,019,000 $0 $2,151,000 $4,170,000 SEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 3 OF 6 II FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 TOTAL 201 COST OBJECT CURRENT RESERVE FOR 1981 IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL I CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET SEWER COLLECTION LINES I 52-10401 2730.14 1100 E 300-400 S. 790 FT 8 INCH LINE 45,000 $45,000 52-10401 2730.14 400 W 225-300 S 650 FT 8 INCH LINE 45,000 45,000 52-10401 2730.14 LAKE ST LOVELAND AVE 1000 FT 8 INCH LINE 55,000 55,000 I 52-10401 2730.14 MEAD AVE EMERY ST 300 FT 12 INCH LINE 40,000 40,000 52-10401 2730.14 ALLEY 900 S 700-800 W 780 FT 10 INCH LINE 50,000 50,000 52-10401 2730.14 200 W FAYrrrE,BROOKLINE WASHINGTON 1300 FT 10 INCH LINE 20,300 59,700 80,000 I 52-10401 2730.14 ALPINE PLACE,GILMER DR. 350 FT 8 INCH LINE 35,000 35,000 52-10401 2730.14 ALLEY 100 S EUCLID 100-1100 W 800 FT 15 INCH LINE 65,000 65,000 ' 52-10401 2730.14 700 S I-15 700 FT 15 INCH LINE 55,000 55,000 52-10401 2730.14 500 S I-15 600 W 1100 FT 24 INCH LINE 115,000 115,000 52-10401 2730.14 800 S 300-400 W 8900 FT 24 INCH LINE 75,000 75,000 I 52-10401 2730.14 600 S 800-900 W 800 FT 30 INCH LINE 95,000 95,000 52-10401 2730.14 BALTIC COURT 360 FT 8 INCH LINE 45,000 45,000 52-10401 2730.14 300 WEST (EAST SIDE) 442 TO 500 NORTH (CARRY OVER) 35,000 35,000 52-10401 2730.14 WEST TEMPLE,1080 TO 1180 SOUTH (CARRY OVER) 45,000 45,000 I 52-10401 2730.14 MAIN STREET (EAST SIDE) 200 TO 300 NORTH (CARRY OVER) 45,000 45,000 52-10401 2730.14 500 NORTH (NO. SIDE) 240 TO 295 WEST (CARRY OVER) 35,000 35,000 52-10401 2730.14 600 WEST, 700 TO 800 SOUTH 24 INCH LINE (CARRY OVER) 60,000 60,000 I 52-10401 2730.14 600 SOUTH, 100 WEST TO 1100 WEST 21 INCH LINE (CARRY OVER) 75,000 75,000 52-10401 2730.14 600 SOUTH, 1100 WEST TO 1170 WEST 21 INCH LINE (CARRY OVER) 50,000 50,000 52-10401 2730.14 EMERY STREET, 700 SOUTH TO 1000 SOUTH 15 INCH LINE (CARRY OVER 75,000 75,000 I52-10401 2730.14 VARIOUS COLL. LINES REPLACEMENTS 200,000 200,000 $0 $1,125,300 $294,700 $0 $1,420,000 I I ' 38 I ISEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 4 OF 6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 201 TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET SEWER TRUNK LINES 52-10401 2730.16 1400 N BECK ST 600 FT 64 INCH LINE 200,000 $200,000 I52-10401 2730.16 800 N 1000-1200 W 1600 FT 42 INCH LINE 350,000 350,000 52-10401 2730.16 800-700 S 500 W I-15 2400 FT 24 INCH LINE 225,000 225,000 52-10401 2730.16 4800 W 700-1300 S 4500 FT 24 INCH LINE 500,000 500,000 I 52-10401 2730.16 NORTHWEST QUADRANT TRUNK LINES 1,000,000 1,000,000 52-10401 2730.16 5600 WEST, 2100 SOUTH EXT 50-1370 (CARRY OVER) 1,800,000 1,800,000 52-10401 2730.16 3500 WEST, 1800 SOUTH TO 5TH SOUTH EXT 50-1371 (CARRY OVER) 1,800,000 1,800,000 I52-10401 2730.16 5TH SOUTH TO PUMP STATION 1,480,000 1,480,000 $0 $5,080,000 $0 $2,275,000 $7,355,000 I AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS ' 52-11001 2750.10 (2) TWO TON HIGH PRESSURE TRUCKS $136,000 $136,000 52-11001 2750.10 (2) 3/4 ION PICKUPS 22,000 22,000 I $158,000 $0 $0 $0 $158,000 ' FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT ' 52-11001 2750.30 FRONT END WADER $74,000 $74,000 $74,000 $74,000 I ---- -- ---------- ----- ---------- I I 39 ' SEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 5 OF 6 ' FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989-1990 201 TOTAL I COST OBJECT CURRENT RESERVE FOR 1981 IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET ITREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT 52-11201 2760.20 PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMPS REPLACEMENT $19,994 $20,006 $40,000 ' 52-11201 2760.20 REPLACEMENT OF SERV.WATER PUMPS 25,000 25,000 52-11201 2760.20 FLOW MEASURING DEVICE & SEWER INTERCEPTOR SAMPLES 50,000 50,000 52-11201 2760.20 INFLUENT PUMP HOIST (CARRY OVER) 20,000 20,000 52-11201 2760.20 SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMP (CARRY OVER) 20,000 20,000 I 52-11201 2760.20 PARTS FOR INFLUENT PUMPS (CARRY OVER) 125,000 125,000 52-11201 2760.20 GATE OPERATORS - CLARIFIERS 10,000 10,000 ' $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $175,000 ' TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT 52-10101 2760.30 TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT FOR LIFT STATIONS $20,000 $20,000 I $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 ' OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT I 52-11100 2760.50 COPY MACHINE $1,500 $1,500 TYPEWRITER 1,000 1,000 MICROCASSETTE RECORDER I AND ADAPTORS (2) 500 500 OFFICE FURNITURE (2 OFFICES) 10,000 10,000 ' $13,000 $0 $0 $0r�$13,000 I I an I SEWER UTILITY FUND 02-17-89 I CAPITAL REQUEST SUMMARY PAGE 6 OF 6 FOR FISOAr YEAR 1989-1990 II COST OBJECT 201 TOTAL CURRENT RESERVE FOR 1981 IMPLEMENTATION CAPITAL CENTER CODE DESCRIPTION EARNINGS IMPROVEMENTS RATE INCREASE RATE INCREASE BUDGET I OTHER MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT ' 52-10101 2760.90 GENERATOR UPGRADE LIFT STATION $13,000 $13,000 52-11100 2760.90 IN LINE CONDUCTIVITY & PH METER 2,000 2,000 I52-11100 2760.90 WALK-IN INCUBATOR FOR BOD STORAGE 12,000 12,000 52-11100 2760.90 WALL SIZED REFRIDGERATOR 8,000 8,000 52-11100 2760.90 OOLIFORM INCUBATOR 1,000 1,000 52-11100 2760.90 ADAPTOR & CAMERA FOR MICROSCOPE 1,000 1,000 I 52-11100 2760.90 MILL,GRINDER,VENTILATOR SYSTEM FOR SOILS 8,000 8,000 52-11100 2760.90 AA LAMPS & ULTRASONIC CLEANER 3,000 3,000 I 52-11100 2760.90 DRYING OVEN FOR SOILS 2,050 2,050 52-11100 2760.90 SAMPLERS 2,488 2,012 4,500 52-11101 2760.90 RADIO & BASE 500 500 I52-11101 2760.90 FIRE PROOF DOCUMENT STORAGE 5,000 5,000 52-11101 2760.90 SAFETY EQUIPMENT (NON-SPARKING) 1,500 1,500 52-11101 2760.90 DRYING OVEN 1,000 1,000 52-11101 2760.90 BALANCE,METTLER AE 260 2,500 2,500 I 52-11101 2760.90 AMPEROUTRIC TITRATOR 1,500 1,500 52-11101 2760.90 CLASS S CERTIFIED WEIGHT 1,500 1,500 52-11101 2760.90 NBS CERTIFIED THERMOMETER 600 600 I52-11101 2760.90 CULTURE INCUBATOR 500 500 52-11201 2760.90 POWER CONDITIONERS 9,500 9,500 52-11201 2760.90 PORTABLE PERSONNEL LIFT 12,000 12,000 52-11201 2760.90 CARPENTRY SHOP TOOLS 17,000 17,000 ' 52-11201 2760.90 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT 4,000 4,000 t $52,538 _-$599112 $0 $0 $111,650 TOTAL CAPITAL $337,532 $9,818,418 $294,700 $4,426,000 $14,876,650 I I 41 11111 1 1 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES DI/SEWER SEWER UTILITY FUND FIVEYEAR/2 SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 02-16-88 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 FIVE YEAR DEPARTMENT / PROJECT FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM PUBLIC UTILITIES 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL BUILDINGS ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE 500,000 500,000 LIFT STATIONS BILLY MITCHELL STATION UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 PIONEER ROAD UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 AIRPORT STA.4000 W N.TEMPLE PUMP & MOTOR 25,000 25,000 900 S W TEMPLE NEW 150,000 150,000 AIRPORT GATE UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 AIRPORT FUEL FARM UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 N BONNEVILLE STATION UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 1800 NORTH REDWOOD RD UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 5850 W AMELIA EARHART UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 N STAR DR & PATERCIA WY UPGRADE 10,000 10,000 1805 INDEPENDENCE BLVD 20,000 20,000 NORTHWEST QUADRANT LIFT STATION 500,000 500,000 4130 SOUTH & CENTENNIAL PARK 50,000 50,000 350 NORTH & 4800 WEST 50,000 50,000 STORM SEWER LIFT STATIONS 2495 W ANDREW AVE. UPGRADE 10,000 10,000 1950 W 1100 NORTH UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 PAXTON AVE. & 700 W UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 LIBERTY PARK STATION UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 1304 S CONCORD ST UPGRADE 30.000 30,000 300 WEST 1300 SOUTH 20,000 20,000 1950 W. 1100 N. RD.& DRAIN. LS 20,000 20,000 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES D1/SEWER SEWER UTILITY FUND FIVEYEAR/2 SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 02-16-88 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 FIVE YEAR DEPARTMENT / PROJECT FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM PUBLIC UTILITIES 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT MODIFICATION CHLORINATION SYSTEM 50,000 50,000 SERVICE WATER FILTRATION 10,000 10,000 FREEWAY IRRIGATION DEMO 125,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,125,000 IMPROV. PRIMARAY SCUM REMOVAL 50,000 50,000 IMPROVEMENTS TO INFLUENT GATE AT PRETREATMENT PLANT 25,000 25,000 REPLACE GRIT SCREW - MAIN PLANT 25,000 25,000 CORRECT ROOF TIE PROBLEMS FOR SEISMIC PROTECTION 100,000 100,000 _ EARTHQUAKE LIQUEFACTION STUDY 50,000 50,000 IMPROVEMENT TO PROTECT FACILITY FROM EARTHQUAKE 50,000 100,000 150,000 300,000 LABORATORY ADDITION 200,000 200,000 PRETREATMENT PLANT FUEL TANK MODIFICATIONS 10,000 10,000 FUEL SYSTEM CONTROL FOR ENERGY c"' RECOVERY SYSTEM UPGRADE 20,000 20,000 SLUDGE DRYING BEDS IMPROVEMENTS 2,000,000 2,000,000 WETLANDS ENHANCEMENT 300,000 300,000 EXPANDING SLUDGE MANAGE.PROGRAM 10,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 100,000 000R CONTROL FOR SLUDGE THICKENERS 100,000 100,000 LOWERING SLUDGE STORAGE TANK & PAINT INTERIOR 100,000 100,000 NEW PRIMARY CLARIFIER 300,000 300,000 DIGESTER STEAM BOILERS REPLACE. 50,000 50,000 DIGESTER MIXING SYSTEM UPGRADE 150,000 150,000 VARIABLE SPEED DRIVE AT PRETREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 50,000 50,000 METHANE GAS STORAGE 350,000 350,000 STRUCTURAL REPAIRS - TRICKLING FILTER UNITS 50,000 50,000 DIGESTER MODIFICATIONS 10,000 10,000 20,000 SITE CURBING 15,000 15,000 30,000 EMERGENCY BYPASS PUMPING 200,000 300,000 500,000 RAG DEWATERING PRETREAT.PLANT 30,000 30,000 POTABLE WATER SYSTEM-PRETREATMENT 10,000 10,000 GRIT REMOVAL AT PRETREAT. PLANT 500,000 500,000 ENGINEERING FOR SLUDGE BEDS 120,000 120,000 ENGINEERING FOR MAINT. BLDG. 30,000 30,000 REHAB MAINT. STOREHOUSE AND 0 ADDITION TO LABORATORY 500,000 500,000 PUBLIC UTILITIES 01/SEWER SEWER UTILITY FUND FIVEYEAR/2 SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 02-16-88 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 FIVE YEAR DEPARTMENT / PROJECT FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM PUBLIC UTILITIES 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL SITE CURBING 15,000 15,000 DIGESTER VENTILATION 25,000 25,000 COVER GRIT CHANNEL 50,000 50,000 INFLUENT GATE MODIFICATIN 25,000 25,000 FIBERGLASS GRATING 15,000 15,000 FAN HOUSE RADIATOR 10,000 10,000 SEWER COLLECTION LINES 1100 E 300-400 S,790 FT.8 INCHES 45,000 45,000 400 W 225-300 S,650 FT.8 INCHES 45,000 45,000 LAKE ST.LOVELAND AVE,1000 FT.BIN 55,000 55,000 MEAD AVE.EMERY ST.,300 FT. 12 IN 40,000 40,000 ALLEY 900 5 7-8TH W,780FT.10IN 50,000 50,000 200 W,FAYETTE,BROOKLYN, WASHINGTON,1300 FT. 10 INCHES 80,000 80,000 ALPINE PL.GILMER DR.350 FT.8IN 35,000 35,000 ALLEY 100 S EUCLID 100-1100 W 800 FT. 15 INCHES 65,000 65,000 -o. 700 S I-15 700 FT. 15INCHES 55,000 55,000 500 S 1-15-600 W 1100FT. 24 INCH 115,000 115,000 800 S 300-400 W BOOFT. 24INCH 75,000 75,000 600S 800-900 W,800FT. 30INCH 95,000 95,000 BALTIC COURT 360FT. 8INCH 45.000 45,000 EMERGENCIES 200,000 200,000 300 WEST (EAST SIDE)442-500 NO. 35,000 35,000 WEST TEMPLE, 1080 TO 1180 SOUTH 45,000 45,000 MAIN STREET(EAST SIDE)200-300 NO 45,000 45,000 500 NO. (N.SIDE)240-295 WEST 35,000 35,000 600 WEST,700-800 SOUTH 60,000 60,000 600 SO. , 100 W. TO 1100 WEST 75,000 75,000 600 50. ,1100 WEST TO 1170 WEST 50,000 50,000 EMERY STREET, 700-1000 SOUTH 75,000 75,000 VARIOUS COLL. LINE REPLACEMENTS 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,000,000 SEWER TRUNK LINES 1400 N BECK ST 600FT.64INCH 200,000 200,000 800 N 1000-1200 W 1600FT.42IN 350.000 350.000 800-700 5 500 W I-15,2400FT24IN 225,000 225,000 4800W 700-1300S 4500FT.24INCH 500,000 500,000 1 PUBLIC UTILITIES 01/SEWER SEWER UTILITY FUND FIVEYEAR/2 SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 02-16-88 ' 7/1/89 THROUGH 6/30/94 FIVE YEAR DEPARTMENT / PROJECT FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL PROGRAM PUBLIC UTILITIES 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 TOTAL SEWER TRUNK LINES 1300 S 4200-4800W,4500FT.18INCH 350,000 350,000 2200W 1800-2100N,2300FT.24IN 250,000 250,000 2100N2200-3200W,8000FT.18INCH 640,000 640,000 1300S 5600-7200W,16000FT.18INCH 0 VARIOUS TRUNK LINE REPLACEMENTS 650,000 650,000 NORTHWEST QUADRANT TRUNK LINES 1,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 5600 W. 2100 SOUTH EXT 50-1370 1,800,000 1,800,000 3600 W. 1800 SOUTH EXT 50-1371 1,800,000 1,800,000 N.TEMPLE-PUMP ST. EXT 50-1385 1,480,000 1,480,000 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT u' cn PRIMARY SLUDGE PUMPS REPLACEMENT 40,000 40,000 REPLACEMENT OF SERV. WATER PUMPS 25,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 FLOW MEASURING DEVICES & SEWER INTERCEPTOR SAMPLES 50,000 50,000 #2 & #3 INFLUENT PUMPS UPGRADE 150,000 150,000 300,000 INFLUENT PUMP HOIST 20,000 20,000 SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMP 20,000 20,000 PARTS FOR INFLUENT PUMPS 125,000 125,000 GATE OPERATORS-CLARIFIERS 10,000 10,000 OTHER EQUIPMENT: L.STATION SONAR LEVEL:TELE EQUIP 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS 232,000 240,000 190,000 121,000 241,000 1,024,000 COMPUTER UPGRADE TREAT. PLANT 200,000 200,000 GENERATOR UPGRADE LIFT STATION 13.000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 65,000 ENGINE GENERATOR UPGRADE T.P. 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 LABORATORY INTRUMENTATION T.PLANT 100,000 100,000 POWER CONDITIONERS 9,500 9,500 PORTABLE PERSONNEL LIFTS 12,000 12,000 CARPENTRY SHOP TOOLS 17,000 17,000 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT 4,000 4,000 GENERATOR FOR LIFT STATIONS 13,000 13,000 LABORATRY EQUIPMENT 56,150 56,150 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 14,876,550 5,173,000 3,538,000 3,124,000 2,654,000 29,365,650 , I I) I I I I I IRATE INCREASE .......•••••••••••••"""*"...1 I • 1 I I I I I ID I II • PUBLIC UTILITIES PROPOSED RATE CHANGES II I. PROPOSED WATER RATE INCREASE ITo finance the major capital improvements required by the Water Utility Fund in our 5 Year Capital Improvement Program, the department I of Public Utilities recommends as part of the 1989-90 Budget that a sur- charge be placed on the minimum charge of $1.00 per month ($12.00 per yr) for residential 3/4" x 1" meter and a proportional amount as shown for the following meter sizes. It is also proposed that the usage rate be I increased by $.04 per hundred cubic feet from $.38 to $.42 for city residents and by $. 06 per hundred cubic feet from $.56 to $.62 for our county customers. This rate increase would generate $2,000,000 per year II to finance major capital improvements. Size of City's Old City's New County's Old County's New Increase 1 Connection Rate/Month Rate/Month Rate/Month Rate/Month Per Year 3/4" - 1" $ 5. 70 $ 6. 70 $ 8.20 $ 9.20 $ 12.00 II 1" - 1/2" 16.55 19.30 23.55 26.30 33.00 2" 24. 85 29. 10 34.85 39. 10 51.00 II 3" 49. 75 58.50 70. 75 79.50 105.00 4" 76. 70 90.20 117. 70 131.20 162.00 I6" 163. 75 192.50 234. 75 263.50 345.00 1 8" . 244.55 287.30 350.55 393.30 513. 00 10Ir 348.20 409.20 499.20 560.20 732.00 IIII. PROPOSED SE4E'? RATE DECREASE I In reviewing the Sewer Utility 201 Cash Flow Plan with the revised projections for 1989 and budget requests for 1989-90 it is anticipated that the sewer rates could be reduced and still fund the capital II improvements required for the next 10 years. This will assure the citizens of Salt Lake City one of the lowest rates in the valley and still provide a strong financial plan for the next decade. The sewer rate reduction would be from $.85 to $.80 which would reduce the average IIresidential use by $.40 per month or $4. 80 per year. IIIII. NET EFFLL"I TO CITY RESIDENTIAL CUS7CARS AMMO' RATE 'PEARLY RATE CURRENT PROPOSED II l!'CREASE/DECREASE INCREASE/DECREASE ANNUAL BILL ANNUAL B 1 LL WATER $1. 00 $12.00 $135.28 $147. 28 II SERER (.40) (4. 80) 81.60 76. 80 TOTAL $0. 60 $7.20 $216.88 $224. 08 II46 IPUBLIC UTILITIES COMPARISON OF ANNUAL WATER & SEWER BILLS IUNDER PROPOSED RATE CHANGES Option 12/Water Rate Increase 2,M Minimum 5.70 to 6.70 ' Usage Rate .38 to .42 Sewer Rate Decrease .85 to .80 I SMALL AVERAGE MULTIPLE MEDIUM LARGE LARGE I RESIDENCE RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS BUILDING BUILDING HOTEL MINIMUM ONLY 3/4 CONNECTION 1 1/2 CONNECTION 4 CONNECTION 8 CONNECTION 6 CONNECTION CURRENT CHARGES I WATER 68.40 135.28 999.48 2,748.03 12,662.99 27,222.57 SEWER 81.60 81.60 1,782.02 1,397.31 7,752.10 53,037.75 ITOTAL 150.00 216.88 2,781.58 4,145.34 21,415.09 80,260.32 PROPOSED RATE CHANGE ' WATER 80.40 154.32 1,114.39 3,087.85 15,258.44 28,674.25 SEWER 76.80 76.80 1,677.20 1,315.12 7,296.09 49,917.88 TOTAL 157.20 235.92 2,791.59 1,772.73 22,554.53 78,592.13 IDIFFERENCE WATER 12.00 19.04 114.91 339.82 1,595.45 1,451.68 ' SEWER (4.80) (4.80) (104.82) (82.19) (456.01) (3,119.87) TOTAL 7.20 14.24 10.09 257.63 1,139.44 (1,668.19) IPERCENTAGE CHANGE 4.8 6.6 .36 6.00 5.00 (2) ' ANNUAL INCREASE WATER INCREASE IN MINIMUM 12.00 12.00 33.00 162.00 513.00 732.00 IINCREASE IN USAGE RATE .00 7.04 81.91 177.82 1,082.45 719.68 ANNUAL DECREASE SEWER (4.80) (4.80) (104.82) (82.19) (456.01) (3,119.87) ITOTAL 7.20 14.24 10.09 257.63 1,139.44 (1,668.19) ' DI-REPORTS 47 M WATER RATE COMPARISON FOR RESIDENTIAL USERS AN N UAL B 1 LLI N G .•.❖.•.•.•.t. 400 --- -- L 350 •- .. - i•i� .�•� ••. 300 ♦� • •••• '•••4 ►• • �� •�•� ••.•.• ... 250 - �� •••• •♦ •• ... •♦• ••• ••• ... I. •••• '•••4 •••♦• ►•••• ••••• ►�•�• ••�• ►•• •♦ ♦♦ ►•• ♦♦ ... ♦♦ •♦• ••• ♦♦ ►•41 ♦• 41,4 ►♦• ♦• •♦ .•• •• 0♦1 ��'� .•••• ►•••1 '•••4 ••♦•4 '•••1 ►•••• • '••♦1 ►•••1 ••. 0"0 150 }- • .. •�••4 • '•♦•' '•••• ►'•'i '•••' ►'•••4 �•••1 ••••' •••♦• ♦• •• ►•• •• .•♦ •• ••• ••• •• •• ••1 ►•• ►♦• •• •• .•• ••4 •• ►•• •• ••4 ••• •• •. ••• •• •• ••1 •• ►•• •• •• ••♦ .•• .. ►•• ••• •• .•• •• ••1 ••• •• 100 - • ►•. ••• .• ►•• •• ►•• •• ••• .•• •• •• ••• •••• •• ••• •• 1•1 •••• •• •• ►•• .• •• 6•4 •♦ ►•• •• •• ►♦• A. •• •• ••• ►•• •• 6•1 •• ••• ••• •• •• ••• •• •• .•• •• .•• •• •• ••• •• •♦ .♦• .•• •• •••4 •• 0•4 ••4•• •• ••• ••4 •• 50 •• •♦ .•►•• •• •. ••• •• ..• •♦ ••• ►♦• ••• ►•• •♦ ►.• .• ►•• ►•• •♦ •• ►•• •• •• 6•4 •• ►•• •• •• .♦• •♦ •• ••• ►•• •• .•♦ •• •.• .•• •• • ••�• ••• •♦ •• ►1• .♦ ►•• •. •• ••• 0 •�• ••••i .•••. �•••� ••••i �•••� ••.•• �•••4 - .•••0, ►�••• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. LAS VEGAS VALLEY 6. SL COUNTY CONSERVANCY DISTRICT 2. OGDEN CITY 7. SANDY CITY 3. SL COUNTY PROPOSED RATE INCREASE 8. SLC PROPOSED RATE INCREASE 4. SALT LAKE (COUNTY) 9. TAYLORSVILLE/BENNION DISTRICT 5. BOUNTIFUL CITY 10. SALT LAKE CITY CORP. 11111 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UT SEWER RATE AND CONNECTION FEE AS OF MARCH 17,1989 AVERAGE RES. USER CHARGE CONNECTION RECIEVED YEARLY ANNUAL ESTIMATED ENTITY PER MONTH FEE TAX RATE EPA FUNDS USER FEES TAXES YEARLY TOTAL GRANGER / HUNTER $9.00 $961.23 0.000590 YES $108.00 $18.88 $126.88 SALT LAKE CITY $6.80 $1,000.00 0.000000 NO $81.60 $0.00 $81.60 SALT LAKE SURBURBAN NO 1 $4.00 $700.00 0.000531 YES $48.00 $16.99 $64.99 COTTONWOOD SANITARY DISTRICT $6.00 $1,200.00 0.000800 YES S72.00 $25.60 $97.60 KEARNS $4.00 $435.00 0.000894 YES $48.00 $28.61 $76.61 SANDY SURBURBAN DISTRICT $5.00 $1,000.00 0.000750 YES $60.00 $24.00 $84.00 SALT LAKE SUBURBAN NO 2 $10.00 $300.00 0.001116 YES $120.00 $35.71 $155.71 MURRAY CITY $5.92 $500.00 0.000000 YES $71.04 $0.00 $71.04 TAYLORSVILLE / BENNION $10.20 $400.00 0.001822 YES $122.40 $58.30 $180.70 WEST JORDAN $14.40 $1,098.00 0.000000 YES $172.80 $0.00 $172.80 LLD S.L. COUNTY SEW IMP DIST #1 $15.00 $1,153.00 0.001734 YES $180.00 $55.49 $235.49 (Serves the City of Draper) AVERAGE $8.13 $778.60 0.000765 $97.58 $24.47 $122.05 PROPOSED RATE DECREASE .80 $6.40 $1,000.00 $76.80 $0.00 S76.80 = 1= NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI NMI mu me um mu me um mu me um mu WATER RATE COMPARISON WITH CONSUMER PRICE INDEX TOTAL INCREASE IN TOTAL INCREASE IN CONSUMER PRICE INDEX WATER RATES 221. 11. - - - - 20 a--.-- �� _ .- 1s 1 Z V 16 - mac.._.. 14 h— , .7 127 / 10 ---- _ ., — / 8 - f �---1 6 / 1 4 r---- i 2 . 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 I I I t 2 1111F3I 41 FUN FUN) (YC1Q1 12 1V�R Rut:MRPA2'OF !CLAN (1(34 E431 YEARS 1935-315 I IIIIRIBIYJISD PEU'N RNS ?EARED RATE 0W1 31 hD 1OCN. O8NQ'81; COD 0(81'W. 01'117L EQO 10CN, YEARLY 11 Il`' Wt L11VE YENS SALES DUCASE IR SERVICE OFNELOPFAS 8OI$/SMO ROANE 81@DCRR6S PAU'FNC 831114'431f MWN28INIS P1117815 D443D11U4 1015E II4031E 1OW. 2% 2% 2% FERaIIdTM 34 31 3% a BFL'QNIIC BAK,¢ 1,533,319 1985-86• 14,654,1863A31,573 700,43) 856,2131,457,25 20,036,836 12,735.756 2,511,714 651A16 2,962,4331,457,25 27.438.56) 183,126 843,116 2,567,551 1986.87• 14,747,947 3,126,21O 799,353 1,327,067 1,015,526 21415,1O3 13,522,293 2,344,597 533,060 3,23,793 1,015,526 20A32,223 332,875 1.234,673 4.135.1(8 1987-88• 15,535,935 3,142,812 2,039,437 930,185 1,043,665 22,746.36 15,271,135 2,641,1E6 545,767 3,743,839 1,043,66 23.250.622 -9)4A18 918,437 4,541,523 1988$9••16,293A03 3,100A00 972,000 946.60)1.556,355 22,824.955 15.81.199 2,634,800 1.533.886 5A25,534 1,556,355 26A36,774 -3,211,819 665A0) 1,932.709 1939-90 17,50,023 3,162,000 972,000 301,330 1,503,023 23,435,3:0 15,215,435 2,901,233 919,118 3,743,9E6 1,500.03D 24,25,300 -853A00 150AJO 1,492,703 1930-91 17,850A00 3,225,2,0 991,44) 235A00 22,301,0)0 15,671.699 2,895,00) 6EA07 3,365,302 22,537,21 -235,521 80.037 1,277,894 1991 32 18,227A00 3,239,745 1,011,29 235A00 22,743414 16,142,56 2,895A70 615A1) 3A18,224 23,070,230 -327,2E6 66.855 1,017,473 I 1992-93 18,571,140 3,355,513 1,031A34 235,000 23,193,174 16,62,318 2,805,0(1D 765Am 3,174A33 B.4(D,356 -267,182 57A37 803,324 1993-94 18.942.5633.42.660 1A62,167 235,00 23,652,337 1,126,1W 2,895A00 615,003 3,346,614 23,581.721 -38.�4 �.318 512.758 1999-95 19.321.414 3A31.103 1,073,167 235,0)3 29.1i0.694 17,fiE,%p 2,B95A03 633,453 3A47Al2 24,614,323 -433.633 15,92 34,546 1935-96 19,707,842 3.560,926 1,514.633 235A00 24.938,338 18,1E8,026 2,B95,00 662,454 3,560,423 25,265,503 -66/.506 -17.952 -650,912 1996.97 2),101,999 3,632,144 1,116.522 235A00 25,05,666 18,713,067 2,895,00) 672,027 3,656,935 25,937,033 -851,364 64,936 -1,566,871 ' 1997-93 2),504.033 3,704,737 1,133,853 235,030 25.932.6"A 19.P4.443 2935AOD ®2.1� 3.766.Cr14 26.623.B1 -lAM5,612 -Ib.BI -2.737,863 1990139 21,914,12)3,77d,883 1,161.630 275A00 2i,083,633 tl,852.®3 2,895.00 712,954 3,8'A,643 27,343.29 -1,293,657 -201,792 -4,190,312 1993-03 21,332.4)2 3,854,43) 1.184,863 235.000 26,65,725 20,443,274 2,935A03 734,342 3,936,032 23.073,6E -1,466,923 -2)5,426 -5,952,661 2:0-0O01 21,793,0503.931,550 1,23,560 235,003 27,134,167 21,061,722 2,895,000 756.372 4,115,913 23,829A07 -10394,843 -43A05 -8455,511 I 3001-3102 22.194.2314,010,181 1.232,731 23.000 27,672,143 21.833.574 2,835A00 7AA64 4.YD.330 8.607,0� -1.934,�5 -541.JP -W.531.775 21012A3 72,633,116 4A30,B4 1,25/,316 2Y>AOD 23,2m,603 23,344,81 2.835,003 826,436 4,437,572 23,627,23 -1,934 503 �7.532 -13.416,775 2[I33.23D4 8,090,BA 4,172,192 1.82,533 235,000 23,780,®4 Z3,014,712 2,B95AOD 82G,503 4,'E7,5® 31,233,790 -2,453,187 -87E3,604 -16,7,8,63 2034-2E05 23,552,636 4,256.636 1,303,184 235,000 35.351,516 23.705.154 2,895,00 851,301 4,632,496 32,83,954 -2,732A33 -1,036.80 -20,80,927 I ,11032 YEAS 1985.1988 NE 83154,MOMS COL3MM •1989-1989 PRE ORIELS any MOMS IS81(R34673)01)30 N3T1312198`FCR OY141Q'FR 592I315. 1.0803AT1I0 KEYENE,PAIE Q CPEAM,MO 0741E5(64 any Ices NE(31'1m(D 1O 0O.7 AY 1%MU 1989-23%. 2.6976717�MO CANT L 13i9OC7R(SS NE F PECIED 10 1DOEAg Er 34 PFR YEAR 11141 1909-3135. I 3.DEBT 33N16:IS me ICIU6,Py'()2098 N1)1RMi18E P681347 REQUIRED CR 111E 1E2311II8)1937 BaD6. 4.INIERMC IS MIMED EASED 64 64 Oa PRIM YEARS BNx1E M1)34 04 111E YEARLY NEC 1OR4.IO4'OE ROW/117RS 1999-205. I I51 I I 03roYD9 UMW 2/PATE 1III4A2 Cr 6 R FU2.7 M 31433 Ur11.r1Y E424) -g i (A91(11W R3R PEERS 1932-20. I I-xI3riN IM1)W(1163 `#3 31 IU1,E1 UENNf1F1; 3)1 PAlE ONFLr1QJ IUDS1U43 W(1513 01PAr1015 CAPITAL U11r 33210E RA3f N1) (441061-1)NW YEARLY 3mT RA14: YEAR F4;V1NE D414A4: F1NS PIC0111S 0L91ARE 5 HUNT EXEN)rN£ 111115 KUIFICATIW I&87(94,F3t 16 F11)PAD' VIAL 1 15tSf 0%91 M1W 1% 1R IR 36 36 36 LI>E CCNS1'. 32M Mr m9C 6.0 R ' DR;ININ;0%91 lW 33 2,SCD,03) 1.03•191283 6,793,23) 1,463,113 435,893 1,367,161 5,450,495 2,094,144 275,945 50,375 2,254,330 4)3,6A 5,1971)00 1.03• 193384 6,330,025 5,710,438 736,032 4,427,783 5,005,332 2,219,144 864,917 718,160 8,437,365 665,135 14,2E0,500 1.03•1484.95 6,335,433 5,707,863 1,172,951 951,749 4,933,634 2,339,654 854,955 371,833 5,665,925 1,532,562 21,493,987 I .90•193586 6,855,864 5,327,332 79,145 S,1A,357 LA15.531 852,6A 7,723,723 2,655,130 -4,444A3) 1,521,564 18,535,711 .90•1936.8E 6,967,925 4b12,113 1A17b53 AIA00 5,354,602 1,�4,626 425,00D 5,714,H34 834.703 950.033 23,370,503 .90•197E-116 6,918,733 41141,745 396,555 5,513,763 1.238,474 095,922 4,935,723 53.156 1.519.639 18.774.750 A5••1988.89 5,796,000 3,800,000 1,332,303 100,E 5,757,39 4,059,616 701.303 4,93,03) 9)3,000 -4190)1155 1,74.07) 15,633,745 I AO 1939-93 5.796.00) 3,100A03 1,332,3) 100A00 6Al2.7� 3.3)6.6`A A1,303 4.1d A00 7.355.000 -ll,492.418 1.674.0m 5,030.17E AO 1930,91 5,953,9.50 3,131,003 1,315,323 103,0)0 6,193,151 1,BBAW ®9,587 1,365,00D 2,000A0D -lA®A`L 233,183 9,245,Q31 AD 1941,92 5,912,500 3,162,310 1,333,476 106A30 6,378,945 1,9�,0m A1,764 1.990,000 -321,514 315A60 4,1E,637 AO 1992-93 5,971,66 3,193,933 1,341,761 103,273 6,573,314 2,034,000 6)7,070 1,030,000 6,662 250,318 4A25,617 .80 1993-94 6,031,341 3,225,872 1,355,179 112,551 6,767,423 1,7041)03 037,316 993,03) 311,102 276,973 5,013,189 I AO 193495 1,031,654 3,259,131 1,363,73) 115.92E 6,9A,446 3,110,000 833.941 2,0m.00D -2,177,799 2A,PB7 3,145,57E AO 19459E 6,152.571 3,290,712 1,82,418 1I9,�5 7,1A,59) 3,313,3W 700.219 -376,193 177,411 2,946,226 AO 1996-97 6,214.037 3,323,62) 1,396,242 122,937 7,334,946 3,299,394 699,035 -932,460 193,3E0 2,523,055 AO 193E 93 6,276,237 3,3561356 1,410,E4 126,677 8,322,716 3,3)3,331 731,933 -1,53,409 106,222 1,123137 I AO 1993 73 6,33),000 3,330,424 1,424,X6 130,47E 8,572,A7 3,503,332 b6,863 2,000,000 -3.676.347 -41.6'1i -2.554.LID AO 1999-2X70 6,412,390 3,434,323 1,433,543 1)4,342 D,BD.S® 3.E05.342 934.4)4 -1,93B.4B -XA.9m -4.652.aA AO b'700-1!)01 6.466.414 3.4�.572 1.452.9Ti 133.473 9.037,456 3.713.503 534A09 -2,152,8E6 -343,734 -7,143,09) AO 431-432 6,511,09 3,493,193 1,467,464 142,576 9,367,20 3232,90B 515,423 -2,423.532 -531.793 -10,064.309 .80 3))2-303 6,916,399 3,523,089 1,42,139 1462953 9,643,333 3,933b55 938,472 -2,716,673 -4E86.252 -13,432.51 I 3130 3703-2021 6,662,353 3,553,323 1,416,960 151.254 9,9A.79J 4A61,845 `1B.019 2.00D,000 -5,012.28 1359.3Qi -19A531357 AO 3A1-27C6 6.78.976 3.599ADi 1.5ll.97D ISS.A7 LL.235,691 4.1A,580 SBDA79 52491,124 -57,213,561 -21183,548 -79,547,966 I 146,633,795 84,903,939 23,376,033 7,543.633 2,115,E63 1E5,631,523 65,194,339 15,073,718 32,434,935 18.510,13) 521391,124 -134,941/92 6/352,467 -13k79,416 • 11111T YEARS 1932 1I141 1913 ARE N11Y4,0793 MUMS 031FL19). •• 1983-1979 ARE 014FM'R.U}1FD M31415. ' 1.O'FIW IN;ROANE,201 PAYE 1N74A.%,AN)NNlSTRN F45 ARE F31/441ID 10 ULW 8r 1%11A7'0£RIM'YEARS 1939-23A6. 2.(1EP)(2IN;AN)CAPITAL 08320r1U45 ARE E1(39135D 11)1104A9;Li(3%PER YEAR 11.4111E ROM'YEARS 1939-2315. 3.N11r 33N1O:IS'D£ACAJAL 1N11M75r EXPENSE AN)19II371E PN1FN)34m3114D 04 TEE I6}SNID 1937 1474)S. 4. 1NI514531 IS EN11M4150 13L93)W 06 W(1U0R YEARS MAKE AN)36 03 11£YEARLY NM'101AL F1R 11E RII1:T YEARS 1989-305. 5.11111:T YEAR 33)4-3113(191931(NS AN)ININIITYN3 COSTS!WE ION MEMEL BY 1,W0,00)10 NITSr I03 83M7IlP 0'F114 PLAIT. ' 6.11111314)N33 P1AIf IS En1114'1FD Al'013r1N;32M IN 1943 1111AP5 P01WHr@G P31 1NIATIW AT 36'0E 0)3f MEANS 10$52,391,124. I52 411111 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES - DISTRIBUTION UPGRADE PROGRAMS PROPOSAL ti ADDRESS STATION SIZE TOTAL LF UNIT COST TOTAL 1 2700 SOUTH 2300 EAST AREA - MABEY 8 2300 EAST 6" 1,200 $38.00 $45,600.00 2700 SOUTH, 2300 EAST AREA - VIMONT AVENUE 6" 700 $38.00 $26,600.00 2 2300 EAST FROM 2700 SOUTH TO 3300 SOUTH 6" 4,700 $38.00 $178,600.00 3 BONNEVILLE HIGH LINE - WASATCH, KENNEDY DRIVE TO EMIGRATION 16" 900 ; $76.00 $68,400.00 4 GLENDALE STREET - CALIFORNIA AVENUE TO 1160 SOUTH 6" 2,000, $38.00 $76,000.00 5 HARTWELL AVENUE - 300 WEST TO 400 WEST 6" 800, $38.00 $30,400. 0 6 HIGH AVENUE - CHEYENNE, CALIFORNIA AVENUE TO VAN BUREN 6" 2,800 $38.00 $106,400.00 7 CANYON RIM LANE 6" 800 $38.00 $30,400.00 8 LARCHMONT - 3380 EAST TO 2920 SOUTH 6" 46 $38.00 $1,748.00 9 COTTONWOOD LANE AREA - DONELSON L. , HIGHLAND DR. TO COTTONWOOD LN. 6" 3,800 $38.00 $144,400.00 COTTONWOOD LANE AREA - WALKER LANE TO BIG COTTONWOOD CREEK 6" 1,500, $38.00 $57,000.00 COTTONWOOD LANE AREA - 2100 EAST TO DONELSON LANE 6" 200' $38.00 $7,600.00 10 PHEASANT WAY AREA - FARDOWN, 2050 EAST TO 2300 EAST 8" 3,500 $42.00 $147,000.00 PHEASANT WAY AREA - 2300 EAST, FARDOWN TO 6200 SOUTH 6" 1,400: $38.00 $53,200.00 PHEASANT WAY AREA - PHEASANT WAY, REGULATOR WEST TO EXISTING 6" 700 $38.00 $26,600.00 11 HILLSIDE LANE - EVERGREEN TO 3900 SOUTH 8" 3,600 $42.00 $151,200.00 HILLSIDE LANE - 3900 SOUTH, 2300 EAST TO 2700 EAST 8" 2,600 $42.00 $109,200.00 12 WOODLAND AVENUE - ORCHARD STREET, 3300 SOUTH TO WOODLAND AVENUE 6" 1,100' $38.00 $41,800.00 13 LA MESA ROAD - EL SERRITO, CUMMINGS TO DEL VERDE 8" 302 , $42.00 $12,684.00 14 RAINER TANK AREA - 3100 SOUTH, SOUTH TO 3300 SOUTH, REPAIR TANK 8" 2,000 $42.00 $84,00C.^" 1i 5TH SOUTH - MILITARY WAY TO WAKARA WAY 12" 2,200 $54.00 $118,800.00 16 UPPER BOUNDARY SPRING LINE - MILLCREEK TANK TO WASATCH BLVD. 8" 2,800 $42.00 $117,600.00 17 LOWER BOUNDARY SPRING LINE - MILLCREEK TANK TO WASATCH BLVD. 6" 2,800, $38.00 $106,400.00 18 MILLCREEK CANYON CANYON RD.- WASATCH BLVD. TO 3800 SO. 8 PARKVIEW DR. 8" 2,500 $42.00 $105,000.00 TOTAL - $1,846,632.00 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 111111/11 WiTER Q SEWER rrILIT . s •. •• . ENTERPRISE FUNDS Prepared by Lee King * The Public Utilities budget, including both Water and Sewer Utility Funds is projected to be $45,976,018. This is 11% below the current year's amended budget. The Water Utility Fund's proposed budget is $24, 285,300 and the Sewer Utility Fund budget is $21,690,718. The budget as submitted provides funding to maintain the current level of operations and maintenance programs which will continue the high level of service enjoyed by the City's Public Utilities customers. * The proposed budget does include a 10% increase in the water rates to fund the 5 Year Capital Improvement Program. Also included is a proposed sewer rate decrease of 6%. The net effect of both changes would increase the average residential users bill by $.60 per month or $7. 20 per year. * Service levels are projected to increase with the addition of 4 personnel. These increases will be offset by a reduction of 8.5 full or part time hourly , positions. The net reduction will be 4.5 positions overall. * Peat Marwick's study on Interfund Charges indicates that Payment in Lieu of Taxation is an option to be considered. The total estimated payment to the General •Fund could be as high as $248,522 for Water and $271, 325 for Sewer. The final report should be presented to the Council and Mayor by the end of the • month. PUBLIC UrIL1TJ S WATER AND SEWER ENTERPRISE FUNDS MATERIAL CHAES IN BUDGET TOTALS The Public Utilities Department is made up of two Enterprise Funds for budgetary purposes, a Water Utility Fund and a Sewer Utility Fund. The combined budgets for the two funds are projected to be $45,976,018 for the FY 89/90 budget year. This is 11% below the current year's combined budget. The Water Utility Fund-s proposed budget is $24, 285,300 and the Sewer Utility Fund budget is $21,690,718. Although' rates are decreasing, the Sewer Utility Budget increased due to higher costs for waste disposal, expansion of required laboratory testing, and additional operating costs associated with the start up of the Trickling Filter and Solids Contact Project. To finance major capital improvements necessary for the Water Utility Fund to complete its 5 Year Capital Improvement Program the department is proposing that water rates be increased by 10% and sewer rates be decreased by 6% for a net increase of 4%. The proposed-rate increase will result in an additional $2,000,000 in revenues for the water utility. The proposed • decrease in sewer rates is due to completion of the first phase of the 201 Cash Flow Plan. The Schedule of Capital Improvements for 1989-1994 is listed on pages 24-26 of the attached Public Utilities Budget. The total 5 year plan is $22, 132,262 of which $6, 168,084 is budgeted for 1989/90. This includes $200,000 for treatment plants, $350,000 'for Dams & Reservoirs, $60,000 for Pump Stations, $50,000 for Wells & Water Sources, $2,067,266 for Water Conduits & Supply Lines, $1,021,700 for Service Connections, and $2,419,118 for Other Equipment. Capital Outlay for the Sewer Utility Fund for the period 1989-1994 is listed on pages 42-45. The total amount is $29,365,650 with the 1989 amount projected at $14,876,650. Funding for employee's merit increases or cost of living increases are not included as part of either utility's budget. Funding for approved increases would require that the Capital Improvement Program be reduced. PROPOSED CHANGES IN SERVICE LEVELS • • Service levels are projected to increase with the addition of two Watershed Patrol Officers to help maintain control and help monitor water quality in the canyons; funding for a Personnel Representative to assist with department personnel matters; and the addition of one part time Canal Maintenance person to increase monitoring and cleaning of the city and county canal system which must be maintained to service water rights associated with the canals. POSSIBLE NEW REVENUES To finance the major capital improvements required by the Water Utility Fund in their 5 Year Capital Improvement Program, the department is requesting a rate increase by placing a surcharge of $1.00 per month on the residential 3/4" x 1" water meter and a proportional amount on other connection sizes. This rate change will have the net effect of raising the minimum rate per month from $5.70 to $6.70 for City residents and $8. 20 to $9. 20 for County residents. The department has estimated that they can reduce sewer rates and still fund the capital improvements for the sewer system for the next 10 years. The sewer rate reduction would be from $.85 to $.80 which would reduce the average residential use by $. 40 per month or $4. 80 per year. The net effect to City residential customers is: MONTHLY RATE YEARLY RATE CURRENT PROPOSED INCREASE/DECREASE INCREASE/DECREASE ,ANNUAL BILL ANNUAL BILL WATER $1.00 $12.00 .•,$135. 28 $147.28 SEWER (.40) (4. 80) $81.60 $76.80 TOTAL $0.60 $7.20 $216. 88 $224.08 CHANGES IN STAFFING • In addition to the increases in personnel staffing for service level changes, the department is recommending that 8.5 positions be eliminated. The net affect will be to decrease the Public Utilities manning document by 2 full time positions and 2. 5 full time equivalent positions. A complete list of requested personnel changes is shown on page 5 of the Public Utilities Budget Request. POLICY ISSUES As part of the overall Interfund Charges Study, the project steering committee requested that Peat Marwick Main & Co. review the concept of Payments in Lieu of Taxation as it pertains to enterprise funds. Their initial draft findings seem to indicate that it payments in lieu of taxation are legally permissible for public utilities; that the Fiscal Procedures Act and bond resolutions expressly allow payments in lieu of taxation; and that some (not many) municipal water systems make payments in lieu of taxation to their general fund. Although Peat Marwick made an initial determination that it is legally permissible for a public utilities to make this kind of payment, they raised the issue of equity in the amounts charged to county users. As was discussed during the Airport budget briefing, Peat Marwick was not so clear on the Airport issue. If payments in lieu of taxation were made by Public Utilities, the estimated tax for City-water users would by $122,818 and $125,704•for the - County. If implemented, the impact would be to reduce the capital improvements program for the Water Utility Fund by this amount. The estimated tax for the Sewer Utility is still under review. The Public Utilities Department has reviewed the initial findings with Peat.Marwick and generally concur with the tone of the report. They do have some concern that the County will object to the estimated taxes being tacked on to their bills. They are also concerned about the equity of charging one enterprise fund and not charging another, i.e. if Public Utilities agrees to the charge but the Airport does not. We should have a better understanding of this issue by the end of the month. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Approve the budget request for FY 1989/90 to include the proposed rate increase for the Water Utility and the rate .decrease for the Sewer Utility. Defer consideration of charging the Water and Sewer Utility Funds for General Fund Services until the Peat Marwick Study is completed.