04/04/1989 - Minutes PROCEIINGS •THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT WE CI1 UTAH
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of
the Whole on Tuesday, April 4, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City
Hall, 324 South State Street.
The following Councilmembers were present:
Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Sydney Fonnesbeck
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler
Councilmember Kirk was absent.
Council Chairperson Stoler presided at the meeting.
Bill Wright, Planning and narrowed down, but that no other
Zoning, discussed the proposed changes were anticipated.
change to the conditional uses in
a "C3-A" zone. He said the Rede- Ms. Gust-Jenson said the city
velopment Agency established the and the cable company had reached
West Temple Gateway Master Plan an agreement on the Cable TV
some years ago, and the proposed Franchise and the proposed changes
changes fit into that plan. He in the ordinance would have the
said when the changes were pro- support of both.
posed, the Council asked that
conditions be stipulated concern- Elaine Weiss, Airport Authority
ing the establishment of car Board, said the Airport bond issue
dealerships as a conditional use was almost ready and the total
and the new ordinance included the issue would be $30, 520, 000. She
criteria for such a use. (attach- said that negotiations concerning
ment #1 ) the documentation of the bond were
not yet finalized and would re-
Councilmember Stoler asked if quire a change in the agenda. She
the car dealership would accept introduced David Bransky of
the change, and Mr. Wright said Ehrlich Bober, who said that the
the dealership had indicated they net interest on the bond would be
could live with the change. Mr. 7. 95% which was comparable or
Wright said the dealerships would better than similar bonds in the
be approved on a case-by-case market now. He said that two
basis and that he did not expect thirds of the bond had been sold
to have a dealership in each "C3- retail and one third had been sold
A" zone. institutionally. He said that 15%
of the bonds had been sold in Utah
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive which was a very good rate.
Director, reviewed the Council
agenda and calendar. Richard Scott, Bond Counsel
from Chapman & Cutler, said the
Lee King reviewed the upcoming Council would need to pull Item
Olympic Bid committee meetings and Fl, the Bond Issuance Resolution,
Councilmember Fonnesbeck ques- from the agenda. He introduced a
tioned whether the Technical resolution to use in place of Item
Committee was considering any F2. ( attachment #2)
venue changes. Mr. King said that
the list of possible ice hockey
and speed skating venues would be
89-82
41989
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Y� y ,
Conditional Uses in a C-3A Zone 11
STAFF RECOMMENDATION BY: Christine Richman -
ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL: This ordinance is proposed to allow automobile
dealerships as a conditional use in a ".C-3A" District. The purpose of asking
for this change is the proposed development of an automobile dealership in the
Gateway Redevelopment area.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: You held a public hearing on this proposed change in
August of 1988. During the hearing you expressed concern that the conditions
for granting an automobile dealership a conditional use permit were not
included in the ordinance.
In accordance with your direction, the Planning staff has drafted, and the
Planning Commission approved proposed criteria for granting automobile
dealerships a conditional use permit in a Commercial "C-3A" zone. Those
conditions are:
a. That the conditional use is identified as an element of a
neighborhood or block master plan. That the conditional use
development complies with any design guidelines established in the
master plan. The project should be contiguous to and functionally
a part of a neighborhood or community auto retail center.
b. That the use be located on a street with a functional
classification of either minor or major arterial.
c. That primary vehicular access be restricted to the minor or major
arterial street.
d. That all repair activities and parts storage are within an
enclosed structure.
e. That landscaped buffer yards and sight proof screening fences will
be provided, if deemed necessary by the Planning Commission,
particularly when the abutting use is residential.
f. That street trees be provided and that required yard areas be
completely landscaped including a sprinkling system.
g. That public parking areas be identified and maintained open to
the public during hours of operation.
h. That there will be no encroachment into yard areas or public
property for vehicle displays.
i. That public address systems are limited to a noise level, at
property line, of 55 dBA if adjacent to residential uses and 66
dBA when adjacent to commercial uses.
These conditions have been included in the ordinance you now have before you.
89-82A1
• • � APR 41989
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The conditions above address a number of
the concerns you expressed during earlier discussions of the proposal. The
architect for Rick. Warner is currently working with the Department of Planning
and Zoning to ensure that the proposed plans for the automobile dealership in
the C-3A zone .conform to the conditions. _ It is my recommendation that you.--w--
adopt the ordinance as written, allowing work to move ahead on the automobile
dealership proposed for the West Temple/Gateway Redevelopment
RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that we adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 62-6f1`' `
Title 21 allowing automobile dealerships as a conditional use in a
District.
ANTICIPATED OPPOSITION: None.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
89-8 2A2
; tIAFT
APR 4 1989
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
•
No. of 1989
(Amending Chapter 62 of Title 21 allowing
automobile dealerships as a conditional
use in "C-3A" District)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 62 OF TITLE 21 ALLOWING
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN A "C-3A" DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, ' the City Council has considered allowing
automobile sales at part of the "West Temple Gateway
Redevelopment Project Area Plan"; and
WHEREAS, some of the area designated for such sales in -the
plan are currently zoned "C-3A" which prohibits open'storage' of
automobiles for sale; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held hearings before the
Planning Commission and before its own body and believes it
appropriate to allow auto sales in a commercial "C-3A" district
as a conditional use.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,
hereby adopts the following amendments to Chapter 62 of Title 21
of the Salt Lake City Code.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah: •
SECTION 1. That Chapter 62 of Title 21 be amended to 'read
as follows:
21.62.010 Permitted uses.
In a C-3A commercial district, all buildings and premises
may be used for any purpose permitted in a C-3 commercial
district, except any business which requires the open storage of
any merchandise, vehicles or equipment to be sold, rented or
stored is prohibited except as provided in Section 21. 61.050.
89-8 2A3
410 APR 4 B89.
21.62.020 Building height. * * * -,\
•
21.62.030 Front yards. * * *
21.62.040 Side and rear yards. * * *
21.62.050 Conditional uses.
A. In a C-3A commercial district, the [board of-
•
adjustment] Planning Commission may permit as a conditional use
the following:
1. * * *
2. New automobile and light truck sales and leasing
including outdoor sales display and enclosed service and parts
•
departments ( "automobile sales use" ) . ' Sales, leasing ,and display
of used vehicles on the same premises shall be allowed only
ancillary to the sale of new vehicles.
i -f d ti.,., a t o ..
-�-�- a-��s��r��-aza��et��a-�� in kccping with
•
•
21.62.060 [ .] Hearing.
[All businesses-is the C z- ,
d, and all storage and
building. ]
The Planning commission shall hold an informal hearing on
applications for a conditional use under this chapter. .
89-82A4 '
-2-
• I APR 41989
21.62.070 Approval criteria.
The Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize the
issuance of a permit for an automobile sales use if it finds that
the proposed use is identified as a recommended use at the
proposed location in an adopted neighborhood master plan. The
Planning Commission shall also consider whether the proposed
automobile sales use development plan complies with the design
guidelines established in the adopted neighborhood master plan.
21.62.080 Design requirements.
a. Conditional automobile sales 'uses shall be addressed
and front on a street designated on the adopted official street
map as either a minor or major arterial street. Primary
vehicular access to the automobile sales use shall be allowed
only on such minor or major arterial street.
b. All service and repair activities and all parts storage
shall be within an enclosed structure.
c. Required customer parking areas shall be marked and
identified as such and shall be maintained opened to customers
during the hours of operation of the business. _ •
21.62.090 Design criteria.
In approving the conditional use, the Planning Commission
may, in addition, require any or all of the design criteria
specified below which are determined to be, reasonably necessary
to minimize the negative aesthetic and planning impacts
associated with the proposed conditional use:
a. Landscaped buffer yards and sight-proof screening
fences as required considering the use of properties in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed automobile sales use;
89-82A5
-3-
4 411 111 111 APR 4 /989
b. Trees planted in the public right of way as
reasonably determined necessary by the Planning Commission
installed and maintained at the cost of the proposed conditional-
user;
c. Yard areas required for the use in the zone .
completely landscaped including a sprinkling system;
d. Such other conditions reasonably necessary to
insure compatibility of uses within the district in conformance
with adopted master plans and polices and as may be necessary to
protect against traffic problems and to protect the character of
the area.
21.62.100 Display prohibitions.
It shall be unlawful to display vehicles on either the
required front landscape setback or the public right of way.
21.62.110 Noise restrictions.
Public address systems for any automobile sales use in a
C-3A district shall not be operated to produce a greater noise
level, at properly line, than 55dBA if adjacent to• a residential
use or 65dBA adjacent to a commercial use.
• 21.62.120 Denial. -
The Planning Commission may deny any application for an
automobile sales use if it finds that the proposed use would not
be in keeping with the character of the surrounding area or would
create undue traffic problems.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon publication.
89-82A6
-4-
411 410 APR 41989
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1989.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed.
(- ' , MAYOR •
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
BRB:pp
89-82A7
-5-
• • • • APR
4 1989
Amended
Salt'Lake City Planning-&-Zoning.Commission-Staff Report
Commercial "C-3A" ordinance text change
OVERVIEW
The Planning Staff is proposing a "text" amendment to the Commercial "C-3A"
zoning district that will accommodate the implementation the "West Temple
Gateway Redevelopment Project Area Plan". The Redevelopment Plan was prepared
in 1987 with•three blocks of the proposed land use devoted to an "Auto-Mall"
concept. The urban design standards of the Plan require landscaped setbacks
and sign control guidelines. The Plan recommends the use of the Commercial
"C-3A" zoning district to control those urban design standards. Portions of
the land allocated for the "Auto Mall" are currently zoned Commercial "C-3A". •
Presently the ordinance specifically prohibits ". . . any business which -
requires the open storage of any merchandise, vehicles or equipment to be
sold, rented or stored". The Planning Staff proposes a change that will
allow, as a conditional use, the sales and leasing of new and used automobiles
and light trucks.
ANALYSIS •
The Commercial "C-3A" zoning district is designed for general commercial uses
except for open storage. This zoning district is applied in a limited number
of, neighborhoods, specifically eight locations. - 1
Brickyard Center 1100 East to 1300 East at 3300 South
Euclid Neighborhood North Temple to 200 South on 900 West
1000 West to 1200 West on 200 South
West Capitol Hill 600 North to 900 North at 350 West
East Downtown S. Temple to 200 South on 400 East
2100 South Freeway Jordan River to Redwood Road
I-80 Frontage - South of Airport and International Center
Raging Waters Jordan River and 1700 South
West Temple Gateway 600 South to 800 South
Wect Temple to 200 West
Using a "Conditional Use" process will allow the Planning Commission to
evaluate the impact of the open storage nature of automobile sales and leasing
on the adjoining commercial and residential neighborhoods. The compatibility
of use, intensity of use, and site design standards will be evaluated for each
proposed use and determined if the use is in keeping with the Master Plan for
the neighborhood.
89-82A8
111
• APR 4 R;
REQTICN . .
The Planning Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission amend
Section 21.62.050 Conditional Uses in the Commercial "C-3A" zoning district to
the following.
SEC. 21.62.050 CalDITICNAL USES:
(A) . In a C-3A commercial district, the Planning Commission may permit as a
conditional use the following:
(1) . An outdoor theater, provided the screens are so located as not to be
visible from any adjoining street or residential area and that the
entrance and exit driveways and the box office are so located that a
traffic problem will not be incurred on any adjoining public street.
(2) . Outdoor sales and leasing of new automobiles and light trucks with
sales of used vehicles being ancillary to new automobile or truck
dealerships.
Each conditional use shall be subject to Planning Commission
evaluation and approval with regards to the following criteria:
• a) . That the conditional use is identified as an
element of a neighborhood or block master plan.
That the conditional use development complies with
any design guidelines established in the master
plan. The project should be contiguous to and
functionally a part of a neighborhood or community
auto retail center.
b) . That the use be located on a street with a
functional classification of either minor or major
arterial.
• c) . That primary vehicular access be restricted to the
minor or major arterial street.
d) . That all repair activities and parts storage are
within an enclosed structure.
e) . That landscaped buffer yards and sight proof
screening fences will be provided, if deemed
necessary by the Planning Commission,
particularly when the abutting use is
residential.
f) . That street trees be provided and that required
yard areas be completely landscaped including a
sprinkling system.
89-82A9
111
411 Apd 4 1989
g) . That public parking areas be identified and : 7)
maintained open to the public during hours of
operation.
h) . That there will be no encroachment into yard areas
or public property for vehicle displays.
i) . That public address systems are limited to a noise
level, at property line, of 55 dBA if adjacent to
residential uses and 66 dBA when. adjacent to
commercial uses.
(II) . The Planning Commission may refuse to approve any conditional use
if it is found that such development would not be in keeping with the
surrounding area or would create undue traffic problems. In
authorizing such a conditional use, the Planning Commission may impose
any conditions it finds necessary to protect against traffic problems
and to protect the character of the area in which the development is to
be located.
The City Council held a public hearing on the earlier: recommendation of the .
Planning Commission to add .the Conditional Use for automobile and truck sales
and leasing. At the conclusion of that hearing, the City Council requested
the Planning Commission to list in the ordinance the "'criteria" guiding the
approval of these "conditional uses" and forward a recommendation for their
review.
•
•
•
89-82A10
• • • •
APR 41989
•
wriEVERWIDI
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
KATHRYN MARSHALL City Recorder • PALMER DEPAULIS
CITY RECORDER 324 SOUTH STATE STREET, 5TH FLOOR MAYOR
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
(801) 535-7671
August 10, 1988
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission •
FROM: Kathryn Marshall •
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING TEXT OF CHAPTER 62 OF TITLE 21,
REGARDING "C-3A" ZONING CONDITIONAL USE
•
At the regular Council Meeting held August 2, 1988, the City
Council referred the :proposed ordinance amending the text of
Chapter 62 of Title 21 regarding Commercial "C-3A" zoning, to
you for further review and recommendations. They felt there
needed to be parameters and conditions set forth in the -ordi-
nance regarding the conditional use. A copy of the proposed
ordinance is attached:
KM:lb
•
89-82A11 •
• • • APR
4 M9
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 1988
(An ordinance amending Chapter 62 of
Title 21 allowing automobile dealerships as
a conditional use in a "C-3A" District)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 62 OF TITLE 21 ALLOWING
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN A ' C-3A" DISTRICT.
WHEREAS,• the City Council has considered allowing automobile
sales as part of the "West Temple Gateway Redevelopment Project
Area Plan"; and 0 -
WHEREAS, some of the area designated for such sales in the •
Plan are currently zoned "C-3A" which prohibits.,open storage of -
automobiles for sale; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has held hearings before the
Planning Commission and before its own body and believes it
appropriate to allow auto sales in a Commercial "C-3A" District
as a conditional use.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,
hereby adopts the following amendments to Chapter 62 of Title 21
of the Salt Lake City Code.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. That Section 21. 62.010 be amended to read as
follows:
Sec. 21.62.010 Permitted Uses.
In a "C-3A" commercial district, all buildings and premises
may be used for any purpose permitted in a "C-3" commercial
district, except any business which requires the open storage of
89-82Al2
•
•
• APR 4 1989
•
any merchandise, vehicles or equipment to be sold, rented or
stored is prohibited, except that the sale or leaee of new or
used cars or light trucks may be allowed as a conditional use as
specified below.
SECTION 2. That Section 21.62.050 be amended to read as -
follows:
Sec. 212: 62.050 Conditional Uses.
A. ***
1. *** -
2. Outdoor sales and leasing of new or used
automobiles and light trucks.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect the date of its
first publication. ;
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1988.
CHAIRPERSON
•
ATTEST: • ��, --:,:,:.;;r.
b.1:3
CITY RECORDER • •
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's action: Approved Vetoed.
•
MAYOR
•
89-82A13
-2-
411 111 411 APR 4 1989
ATTEST:
•
CITY RECORDER
.„.
•
•
_ • , ,
(SEAL)
• _ -
BILL NO. OF 1987
Published:
it
_
GRH:rc
•
•
-3-
B9-82A14
• • . mar.,`'
.ra
t APR 41989
,.5
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 4, 1989
The Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the
"Municipal Council"), pursuant to due notice met in regular public session on April 4, 1989,
at the hour of 6:00 o'clock P.M., at the regular meeting place of the Municipal Council in
Suite 300 in the City Hall, 324 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The meeting was duly called to order by Councilmember
who was conducting, with the following members being present, constituting a quorum of
the Municipal Council:
W. M. (Willie) Stoler Chair
Alan G. Hardman Vice Chair
Florence Bittner Councilmember
Thomas M. Godfrey Councilmember
Sydney R. Fonnesbeck Councilmember
L. Wayne Horrocks Councilmember
Roselyn Kirk Councilmember.
Absent:
There were also present:
Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor
Kathryn Marshall City Recorder
Roger F. Cutler City Attorney.
Sale Resolution
89-82B1
• • • APR 41989
4,
After the minutes of the preceding meeting had been duly read and approved,
the City Recorder presented to the Municipal Council an affidavit evidencing the giving of
not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of
the April 4, 1989, regular meeting of the Municipal Council in compliance with the
requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, by (1) posting
written notice of the meeting at the principal office of the Municipal Council, and (2)
providing notice to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the geographic
jurisdiction of Salt Lake City, Utah, or to a local media correspondent. The affidavit was
ordered recorded in the minutes of the meeting and is as follows:
•
-2-
89-82B2
• • 'R 4
#Irvg
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake
City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify, according to the records of said City in my
official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the
requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less
than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the
April 4, 1989, regular public meeting held by the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt
Lake County, Utah, by:
(a) causing a Notice of Public Meeting to be posted at the principal office of
the Municipal Council at Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street, in Salt Lake City,
Utah, on March 31, 1989, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the
meeting, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A; said Notice of Public Meeting having
continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection during regular office
hours until the convening of the meeting; and
(b) causing a copy of the Notice of Public Meeting in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A to be provided on March 31, 1989, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the
convening of the meeting, to The Salt Lake Tribune and the Deseret News, newspapers of
general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of Salt Lake City, Utah, and to each
local media correspondent, newspaper, radio station, or television station which has
requested notification of meetings of the Municipal Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and
impressed hereon the official seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 4th day of
April, 1989.
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
Salt Lake City,
[SEAL] Salt Lake County, Utah
-3
89-82B3
APR 41999
EXHIBIT A
[Attach Copy of Meeting Notice]
A-1
89-82B4
• • • • APR 4 if rg
Thereupon, after the conduct of other business not pertinent to the following,
the following resolution was introduced in written form by Council-
member and, pursuant to motion duly made by Council-
member and seconded by Councilmember
was adopted and approved by the following vote:
Aye: W. M. (Willie) Stoler
Alan G. Hardman
Florence Bittner
Thomas M. Godfrey
Sydney R. Fonnesbeck
L. Wayne Horrocks
Roselyn Kirk.
Nay: None.
Absent:
The resolution was thereupon presented to and approved and signed by the
Mayor, was approved as to form and signed by the City Attorney, was signed by the Chair of
the Municipal Council, and was attested and recorded by the City Recorder in the official
records of said City. The resolution is as follows:
-4-
89-82B5
• • PR49
RESOLUTION NO. of 1989
A RESOLUTION authorizing the issuance and confirming the sale
of not more than $30,520,000 aggregate principal amount of
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 1989, of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake
County, Utah; and related matters.
*** *** ***
WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
(the "City") considers it desirable and necessary and for the benefit of the City to issue its
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (the "Bonds"), for the purpose of financing
improvements and extensions to the Salt Lake International Airport; and
WHEREAS, the City has authorized the issuance of the Bonds, within certain
parameters, pursuant to Resolution No. 32 of 1989, adopted on March 7, 1989; and
WHEREAS, Smith Barney, Harris Upham d& Co., Inc., Shearson Lehman Hutton,
Inc. and A. G. Edwards do Sons, Inc. (the "Underwriters") have agreed to purchase the Bonds
pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement dated April 4, 1989 (the "Purchase Agreement"),
among the City and the Underwriters; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of the
Purchase Agreement and to fix the terms of the Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City,
Salt Lake County, Utah, as follows:
Section 1. Terms of Bonds. The Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued in
the aggregate principal amount of $30,520,000, shall mature on the dates, shall be subject
to mandatory and optional redemption, and shall bear interest at the rates, payable at the
times, as set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the provisions of which are incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Sale of Bonds. (a) The Bonds are hereby sold to the Underwriters at
the purchase price set forth in the Purchase Agreement, plus accrued interest on the Bonds
from their date to the date of delivery and payment for the Bonds, on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement and upon the basis of the representations
therein set forth. To evidence the acceptance of the Purchase Agreement, the Mayor is
hereby authorized to execute and deliver, and the City Recorder is hereby authorized to
seal, attest and countersign, the Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented at
the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted.
(b) The final Official Statement of the City in substantially the form presented
at the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted, with such changes, omissions, insertions
and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, is hereby authorized and the Mayor shall
sign and deliver such final Official Statement to the Underwriters for distribution to
prospective purchasers of the Bonds and other interested persons. Such approval of any
such changes shall be conclusively established by the Mayor's signing of one or more copies
of the final Official Statement. The prior distribution of the preliminary Official
Statement is hereby in all respects authorized, ratified and approved.
-5-
89-82B6
• • • • APR 4 689
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of April, 1989.
SALT LAKE CITY,
SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH
[SEAL]
Mayor
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
City Recorder
(Other business not pertinent to the above appears in the minutes of the
meeting.)
Upon the conclusion of all business and upon motion duly made and carried, the
meeting of the Municipal Council was adjourned.
W.M. (Willie) Stoler
Chair
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
•
89-82B7 -6-
• • • APR 41989
( STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Kathryn Marshall, do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting
City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.
I further certify that the above and foregoing constitutes a full, true and
correct copy of the minutes of a regular public meeting of the Municipal Council of Salt
Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, held on April 4, 1989, and of a resolution adopted at
said meeting, insofar as said minutes pertain to the matters above set forth, as said minutes
and resolution are officially of record in my possession.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and
impressed hereon the corporate seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 4th day
of April, 1989.
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
[SEAL]
RJS/jgl/858076SR
-7-
89-82B8
•
PROCEEDINGS APTHE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT IKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on
Tuesday, April 4, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South
State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Alan Hardman Sydney Fonnesbeck
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Willie Stoler
Councilmember Kirk was absent.
Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn
Marshall, City Recorder, and LaNita Brown, Deputy Recorder, were present.
Councilmember Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember
Fonnesbeck conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONIES contacted many attorneys to have
them sue the city for false arrest
#1. The invocation was given and imprisonment, then realized
by Police Chaplain Joseph Sanders. that the City Attorney' s Office
was where he should go for re-
#2. The Council led the course. He said he contacted
Pledge of Allegiance. Assistant Attorney Greg Hawkins by
mail in April 1988, then stopped
#3. Councilmember Godfrey in his office in May and a recep-
moved and Councilmember Stoler tionist told him that if he didn' t
seconded to approve the minutes of hear from the Attorney' s Office
the Salt Lake City Council for the within three months he could
regular meetings held Tuesday, assume he had lost his case
March 21, 1989, and Thursday, against the city. He said he then
March 23, 1989, which motion received a letter from Mr. Hawkins
carried, all members present voted on May 10th saying that the city
aye. had probable cause to arrest him,
(M 89-1) after which he immediately went to
Mr. Hawkins office to find out why
no specifics were mentioned in the
COMMENTS letter and was escorted out of the
office. He said he felt the city
Victor Willey, 1028 South 900 owed what was due him for being
East # B, said he had been arrest- incarcerated for so long.
ed on February 17, 1985, in
Smith' s Food King by their manager Mr. Cutler said that it had
because he did not have a receipt been a citizen' s arrest by Smith' s
for a can of food. He said four Food King and incarceration by the
city police officers responded to County, and the city' s only in-
the call and took him to the volvement was Mr. Willey' s being
County jail. He said the only transported to jail by the city
time he was brought before a judge officers.
he had pled not guilty to a charge
of petty larceny, then he spent 32
days in jail and was released
89-83
• �
PROCEEDINGS •THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT IKECITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1989
CONSENT AGENDA Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake
City for the RDA to manage the
Councilmember Godfrey moved Canterbury Apartments.
and Councilmember Horrocks second- (C 89-121)
ed to approve the consent agenda,
which motion carried, all members
present voted aye. NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS
#1. RE: Ordinance 12 of #1. RE: The reappointment of
1989, recognizing the adoption of Jan Graham to the Central Business
Amendment 5-F to the Master Annex- Improvement District Board.
ation Policy Declarations; extend-
ing the limits of Salt Lake City ACTION: This item was re-
to include the Russell and Olwine ferred to the Consent Agenda
Annexation, zoning the same Com- without objection.
mercial "C-3A" ; and amending the (I 89-11)
Salt Lake City Council District
Boundary Map. #2. RE: The appointment of
(P 88-194) James Stewart to the Central
Business Improvement District
#2. RE: The appointment of Board.
Paulette Mounteer to the Urban
Forestry Board. ACTION: This item was
(I 89-3) referred to the Committee of the
Whole without objection.
#3. RE: Resolution 47 of (I 89-11)
1989, authorizing the execution of
an interlocal agreement with Sandy #3. RE: An ordinance amend-
City for Salt Lake City to provide ing Section 21.74.030 creating
fire and dispatch services to additional residency limitations
Sandy City for a fee stated in the on the Historic Landmark Commit-
agreement. tee.
(C 86-649)
ACTION: Councilmember Hard-
#4. RE: Set a date for a man moved and Councilmember Bitt-
public hearing to be held Tuesday, ner seconded to refer this item to
April 18, 1989 at 6:40 p.m. to the Planning Commission, which
obtain public comment concerning a motion carried, all members
proposed ordinance concerning present voted aye except Coun-
Cable TV Franchises in the city. cilmembers Fonnesbeck and Godfrey
(0 89-8) who voted nay.
#5. RE: Resolution 48 of DISCUSSION: Councilmember
1989, authorizing the execution of Godfrey asked if Councilmembers
an interlocal agreement with the Hardman and Fonnesbeck had dis-
Utah Department of Transportation cussed their differences on the
for a utility line agreement for issue since the Council ' s February
installation of a sewer main in a 25th retreat. Councilmember Fon-
state highway. nesbeck said there had been no
(C 89-122) further discussion, and Coun-
cilmember Hardman said he recom-
#6. RE: Resolution 49 of mended referring the ordinance to
1989, authorizing the execution of the Planning Commission.
an interlocal agreement with the (0 89-7)
89-84
PROCEEDINGS 1P THE CITY COUNCIL OFSALT ORE UTAH
C CITY,
TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1989
UNFINISHED BUSINESS The meeting adjourned at 6:20
p.m.
#1. RE: A resolution provid-
ing for the issuance of Airport
revenue bonds.
ACTION: Without objection,
this item was pulled from the
agenda. / /
(Q 88-4) Yr/
#2. RE: A supplemental COU IL Alr" -SON
resolution authorizing the issu-
ance and sale of approximately
$31,000,000 Airport Revenue Bonds,
Series 1989, of Salt Lake City, `
Salt Lake County, Utah; and
related matters. Zi°
CI Y ECORDER CHIEF DEPUTY
ACTION: Councilmember
Godfrey moved and Councilmember
Horrocks seconded to approve
Resolution 44 of 1989, authorizing
the issuance and confirming the
sale of $30, 520,000 aggregate
principal amount of Airport
Revenue Bonds, Series 1989, of
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County,
Utah; and related matters, which
motion carried, all members
present voted aye.
(Q 88-4)
#3. RE: An ordinance amend-
ing Chapter 62 of Title 21 allow-
ing automobile dealerships as a
conditional use in "C-3A" Dis-
tricts.
ACTION: Councilmember
Godfrey moved and Councilmember
Horrocks seconded to adopt Ordi-
nance 13 of 1989, allowing automo-
bile dealerships as a conditional
use in "C-3A" Districts, which
motion carried, all members
present voted aye.
DISCUSSION: Councilmember
Fonnesbeck said she had concerns
about the ordinance and felt that
serious problems might arise in
the future from the combined "C-
3A" and Residential districts.
(0 88-23)
89-85
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - (R0 11 n - ,
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER Can u�w a I en6
SUITE 300, CITY HALL _
324 SOUTH STATE STREET C
Tuesday, April 4, 1989 Waq n�
6:00 p.m.
A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Suite 300 City Hall, 324 South State.
1 . Report of the Executive Director.
B. OPENING CEREMONIES:
1 . Invocation.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Approval of the Minutes.
C. COMMENTS:
1 . Questions to the Mayor from the City Council.
2. Citizen Comments to the Council.
D. CONSENT:
1 . Petition No. 400-595-88 - Russell/Olwine Annexation.
Consider adopting an ordinance recognizing the adoption of Amendment 5-F to
the Master Annexation Policy Declarations; extending the limits of Salt Lake
City to include the Russell and Olwine Annexation, zoning the same
Commercial "C-3A" ; and amending the Salt Lake City Council District Boundary
Map. C ce5 1100 e, 11, ichm C o11'ealric6 {p(DCi+vi .EGG o-
(P 88-194) North 50e o¢ 33c05o•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.
2. Urban Forestry Board - Appointment.
Consider approving the appointment of Paulette Mounteer to the Urban
Forestry Board.
(I 89-3)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve.
3. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - Sandy City.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and Sandy City
Corporation for Salt Lake City to provide fire and dispatch services to
Sandy City for a fee stated in the Agreement. G�°3 Curr�r�i 0600110
(C 86-649) V�'�
a5 1)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.
D. CONSENT Cont' '
4. Cable TV Ordinance.
Set a date for a public hearing to be held Tuesday, April 18, 1989 at 6:40
p.m. to obtain public comment concerning a proposed ordinance concerning
Cable TV franchises in the City. (C ;y
1(l
(0 89-8) 1 � �U1�
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set date.
5. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement - UDOT.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the Utah
Department of Transportation for a utility line agreement for installation
of a sewer main in a state.-�- highway.
(C 89-122) ¶ I
v , o . goe0 we31-,S�Qrfir�� GUI 7005U
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt.
6. Management Agreement - Canterbury Apartments.
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City for the RDA to manage the
Apartments. 4)n �tth preuib
�
(C 89-121) 6Lt u5i5 o -thc� 1b?1c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt .
E. NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS:
1 . Central Business Improvement District - Reappointment .
Consider approving the reappointment of Jan Graham to the Central Business
Improvement District Board. (k[77011lia Nti '(� T�I
(I 89-11) yarmil Jrm III
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Consent.
2. Central Business Improvement District - Appointment.
Consider approving the appointment of James Stewart to the Central Business
Improvement District Board. rep fta t�
(I 89-11) CV) ittp. vr� rrncr 1 tittickS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer to Committee of the Whole.
3. Historic Landmark Committee Ordinance.
Consider adopting an ordinance amending Section 21 .74.030 creating
additional residency limitations on the Historic Landmark Committee.
(0 89-7)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: None. bAk nu1 N M°
F. UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS:
J\\ Airport Revenue Bonds - Issuance.
Consider adopting Resolution No. 44 of 1989 providing for the issuance of
Airport revenue bonds.
(Q 88-4)
'1„6, ,L. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt .
Airport Revenue Bonds - Issuance and Sale. ,4(''‘
Oftirill
� � Consider adopti supplemental Resolutio No. of 1989 aut iz'ng the
m ?UZ issuance and le approximately 31 ,000, 0 Airport R enue Bon , Series
V G 1989, of Sa Lake City, It L e County, Uta • a A�a d matters.
boek.t0� (Q 88-4) S�l�
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt. Oj I
3. Conditional Uses in C-3A Zones.
Consider adopting an ordinance amending Chapter 62 of Title 21 allowing
automobile dealerships as a conditional use n " A" Districts.
(0 88-23) Chrair:- ha ( cicoCeJ ii, 40)i puct,e+-
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: -the A�dop :� noW Intl ode t�-c
-pe!Lt.fic (o►vdc ticeb
H. ADJOURNMENT. ILQ,@at '11 -ID Oran-hrr5 0(vn(, one( USr 6/63,1ikvib
** FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON THIS AGENDA
deu.(erdkup ih 6 £ 3-A
-vm, d;3A ie
:•L
I+D;
DATED: March 31 , 1989
BY:
C TY RECO ER
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss.
On the 31st day of March, 1989, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing
notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous
view, at the following times and locations within City Hall, 324 South State
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah:
1 . At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, 5th Floor; and
2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 336.
CITY ORDER
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31st day of Marc , 989.
'Notary Public residin n e
State of Utah
My Commission Expires:
APPROVAL:
(7'
EXECUTI DIRECTO
Salt Lake City, Utah
April 4, 1989
The Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah (the
"Municipal Council"), pursuant to due notice met in regular public session on April 4, 1989,
at the hour of 6:00 o'clock P.M., at the regular meeting place of the Municipal Council in
Suite 300 in the City Hall, 324 South State Street, in Salt Lake City, Utah.
The meeting was duly called to order by Councilmember
who was conducting, with the following members being present, constituting a quorum of
the Municipal Council:
W. M. (Willie) Stoler Chair
Alan G. Hardman Vice Chair
Florence Bittner Councilmember
Thomas M. Godfrey Councilmember
Sydney R. Fonnesbeck Councilmember
L. Wayne Horrocks Councilmember
Roselyn Kirk Councilmember.
Absent:
There were also present:
Palmer A. DePaulis Mayor
Kathryn Marshall City Recorder
Roger F. Cutler City Attorney.
Sale Resolution
After the minutes of the preceding meeting had been duly read and approved,
the City Recorder presented to the Municipal Council an affidavit evidencing the giving of
not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of
the April 4, 1989, regular meeting of the Municipal Council in compliance with the
requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, by (1) posting
written notice of the meeting at the principal office of the Municipal Council, and (2)
providing notice to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the geographic
jurisdiction of Salt Lake City, Utah, or to a local media correspondent. The affidavit was
ordered recorded in the minutes of the meeting and is as follows:
-2-
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Kathryn Marshall, the duly qualified and acting City Recorder of Salt Lake
City, Salt Lake County, Utah, do hereby certify, according to the records of said City in my
official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the
requirements of Section 52-4-6(2), Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, I gave not less
than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time, and place of the
April 4, 1989, regular public meeting held by the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt
Lake County, Utah, by:
(a) causing a Notice of Public Meeting to be posted at the principal office of
the Municipal Council at Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South State Street, in Salt Lake City,
Utah, on March 31, 1989, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the convening of the
meeting, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A; said Notice of Public Meeting having
continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection during regular office
hours until the convening of the meeting; and
(b) causing a copy of the Notice of Public Meeting in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A to be provided on March 31, 1989, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the
convening of the meeting, to The Salt Lake Tribune and the Deseret News, newspapers of
general circulation within the geographic jurisdiction of Salt Lake City, Utah, and to each
local media correspondent, newspaper, radio station, or television station which has
requested notification of meetings of the Municipal Council.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and
impressed hereon the official seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 4th day of
April, 1989.
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
Salt Lake City,
[SEAL] Salt Lake County, Utah
•
-3-
EXHIBIT A
[Attach Copy of Meeting Notice]
A-1
Thereupon, after the conduct of other business not pertinent to the following,
the following resolution was introduced in written form by Council-
member and, pursuant to motion duly made by Council-
member and seconded by Councilmember
was adopted and approved by the following vote:
Aye: W. M. (Willie) Stoler
Alan G. Hardman
Florence Bittner
Thomas M. Godfrey
Sydney R. Fonnesbeck
L. Wayne Horrocks
Roselyn Kirk.
Nay: None.
Absent:
The resolution was thereupon presented to and approved and signed by the
Mayor, was approved as to form and signed by the City Attorney, was signed by the Chair of
the Municipal Council, and was attested and recorded by the City Recorder in the official
records of said City. The resolution is as follows:
-4-
l�
RESOLUTION NO. 1-,--t of 1989
A RESOLUTION authorizing the issuance and confirming the sale
I
of not more than $30,520,000 aggregate principal amount of `
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 1989, of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake '
County, Utah; and related matters.
WHEREAS, the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
(the "City") considers it desirable and necessary and for the benefit of the City to issue its
Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 1989 (the "Bonds"), for the purpose of financing
improvements and extensions to the Salt Lake International Airport; and
WHEREAS, the City has authorized the issuance of the Bonds, within certain
parameters, pursuant to Resolution No. 32 of 1989, adopted on March 7, 1989; and
WHEREAS, Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc., Shearson Lehman Hutton,
Inc. and A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (the "Underwriters") have agreed to purchase the Bonds
pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement dated April 4, 1989 (the "Purchase Agreement"),
among the City and the Underwriters; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the execution and delivery of the
Purchase Agreement and to fix the terms of the Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by the Municipal Council of Salt Lake City,
Salt Lake County, Utah, as follows:
Section 1. Terms of Bonds. The Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued in
the aggregate principal amount of $30,520,000, shall mature on the dates, shall be subject
to mandatory and optional redemption, and shall bear interest at the rates, payable at the
times, as set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the provisions of which are incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2. Sale of Bonds. (a) The Bonds are hereby sold to the Underwriters at
the purchase price set forth in the Purchase Agreement, plus accrued interest on the Bonds
from their date to the date of delivery and payment for the Bonds, on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement and upon the basis of the representations
therein set forth. To evidence the acceptance of the Purchase Agreement, the Mayor is
hereby authorized to execute and deliver, and the City Recorder is hereby authorized to
seal, attest and countersign, the Purchase Agreement in substantially the form presented at
the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted.
(b) The final Official Statement of the City in substantially the form presented
at the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted, with such changes, omissions, insertions
and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, is hereby authorized and the Mayor shall
sign and deliver such final Official Statement to the Underwriters for distribution to
prospective purchasers of the Bonds and other interested persons. Such approval of any
such changes shall be conclusively established by the Mayor's signing of one or more copies
of the final Official Statement. The prior distribution of the preliminary Official
Statement is hereby in all respects authorized, ratified and approved.
-5-
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its adoption.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of April, 1989.
SALT LAKE CITY,
SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH
[SEAL]
Mayor
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
City Recorder
(Other business not pertinent to the above appears in the minutes of the
meeting.)
Upon the conclusion of all business and upon motion duly made and carried, the
meeting of the Municipal Council was adjourned.
W.M. (Willie) Stoler
Chair
[SEAL]
ATTEST:
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
-6-
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
I, Kathryn Marshall, do hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting
City Recorder of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah.
I further certify that the above and foregoing constitutes a full, true and
correct copy of the minutes of a regular public meeting of the Municipal Council of Salt
Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, held on April 4, 1989, and of a resolution adopted at
said meeting, insofar as said minutes pertain to the matters above set forth, as said minutes
and resolution are officially of record in my possession.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature and
impressed hereon the corporate seal of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah, this 4th day
of April, 1989.
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, Utah
[SEAL]
RJS/jg1/858076SR
-7-
PROCEEDINGS F THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT -AKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of
the Whole on Tuesday, March 21, 1989, at 5:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City
Hall, 324 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Sydney Fonnesbeck Tom Godfrey
Wayne Horrocks Alan Hardman Willie Stoler
Councilmember Kirk was absent.
Council Chairperson Stoler presided at the meeting.
The Council interviewed Dan Mr. Stoler said that because of
Bethel prior to consideration of the rumors, damage had already
his proposed appointment to the been done to individual reputa-
Planning Commission. Council- tions and the image of the Coun-
member Stoler asked Mr. Bethel cil. He said he wanted the inves-
what his interests and qualifi- tigation to clear the air. He
cations were for the job. Mr. said he believed that he could
Bethel said he had been attending lead the investigator to the
the Westside Community Council source of the rumor. Council-
meetings and he had worked with member Florence Bittner said that
several architectural firms on because her name was mentioned in
projects in the downtown, such as connection to the rumors she
the Salt Palace Expansion. He wanted the investigation to clear
said he had a bias toward histori- her name and the reputation of the
cal preservation and had worked Council. She said the charges
with the Landmarks Committee in were very serious and reflected
developing some property in the poorly on the Council and on the
Capitol Hill neighborhood. financial institution involved.
Councilmember Horrocks said Mr.
Bethel had spoken with the Chair Councilmember Fonnesbeck asked
of the Planning Commission about if the investigation was to deter-
the time commitment needed and mine the truth of the rumor, or
Mr. Bethel felt he had the time. just its source. Mr. Stoler said
it would try to do both. Ms.
Mr. Stoler said he wanted to Fonnesbeck also asked if any names
call an emergency meeting of the had been mentioned specifically by
Redevelopment Agency to discuss Councilmember Godfrey, Mr. Stoler
the possibility of hiring an inde- said that no names had been men-
pendent investigator to investi- tioned.
gate the source of, and the valid-
ity of, rumors of impropriety in Mr. Stoler said the financial
the selection of bond counsel for institution involved deserved to
the Block 57 project. have the suspicion removed from
its reputation, as did the Coun-
Councilmember Godfrey said he cil. Councilmember Horrocks said
felt he was misunderstood during the whole thing had been blown out
the March 16, 1989, RDA meeting of proportion and the investiga-
and said he had written out his tion was needed to set the record
views in a letter to Council Chair straight.
Stoler. Mr. Godfrey then read the
text of the letter ( attachment
#1 ) .
89-71
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT — KE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Mrs. Bittner said she was
said the Council should check with concerned about the maintenance
Bill Oswald, RDA' s attorney, to budget for the units, stating that
see if the call for an emergency many people had complained about
meeting was appropriate. Mr. the upkeep on subsidized housing
Cutler said he was concerned about units. Mr. Nelson passed out a
discussing a non-agenda item and pro forma budget sheet for the
that the Council should take the program (attachment #2 ) and said
time to follow all of the open the maintenance budget was the
meeting procedures. Mr. Stoler same as mandated by federal pro-
said he would call the special grams .
meeting within the next 72 hours
and would make sure that all the Mr. Stoler asked if there were
requirements were met. any other programs providing
single family units. Mr. Horrocks
Mrs. Bittner said the Council asked how this program fit into
needed to provide a forum to the big picture of housing subsi-
discuss complaints from the archi- dies. Mr. Nelson said that while
tectural community regarding the there were other programs designed
contract process for proposed to help singles, elderly and
arena sites. Mrs. Bittner asked handicapped, this was the only
that this be put on the agenda for program for families in single
the special meeting of the RDA units. He said the program com-
Board of Directors. bined housing with job guidance
and required the families to
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive develop a plan for moving out of
Director, reviewed the agenda for subsidized housing. He said the
the meeting. program included job skill train-
ing, counseling and coordinated
Mr. Arlo Nelson, Executive other services geared to making
Director of the Housing Authority, the families self-sufficient.
briefed the Council on the Transi-
tional Housing Interlocal Agree- Mr. Lee King gave an update on
ment (agenda item E3 ) . Mr. Nelson Olympic Committee activity and
said the Housing Authority planned said that RSVPs were needed for
on using revenues generated by the Deer Valley reception as soon
payments paid in lieu of taxes, to as possible.
house sixteen families in single
unit renovated houses in Salt Lake The meeting adjourned at 6 :00
City. He said if the Council p.m.
approved the appropriation, the
Housing Authority would submit an
application to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development for
matching funds to run the program.
He said the average purchase price
for each house was approximately
$37, 000 and the dedication of the
houses to the program counted as
Salt Lake' s portion of the match-
ing funds. Mr. Nelson said the
Housing Authority would be adding
nine units, on which they held
options, and would have 16 total
units in the program.
89-72
COUNCIL MINUTES
f 4. MARCH 21, 1989
ATTACHMENT #1
THOMAS M. GODFREY
COUNCILMAN. DISTRICT #
1233 SOUTH 700 EAST
- .. SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84108 . - �'" _
SALT'r►,;cennr amo° A6 1 IMN1
OFFICE -OF THE.CITY...COUNCIL
•:`21 1•CITY.&-COUNTY BUILDING
SALT LAKE CITY. UTAH 84111-
535:7600
March 21, 1989
•
W. M. "Willie" Stoler
Council Member
District 7 -
Salt Lake City council
•
• Dear Willie:
•
Recent newspaper articles about the RDA bonding contract and about your •
request for an investigation have led me to write this letter. I feel there
is some confusion as to what motivated me to make certain statements at last
Thursday's RDA meeting, and some explanation may help diffuse, what I believe
is, your overreaction to the situation.
As you will recall, I spoke strongly against recognizing a five year old
contract. I did so because I believe that it reflects bad political
judgement. I was concerned about a rumor which stated that this issue had
been discussed with at least one Council Member and a principal of the bank,
and that the agency might steer the contract to Zions. - I felt that anything
that would put any cloud over the agency or cause it embarrassment needed to
"' be cleared up. For me, then and now, the cleanest way to clear up the
situation would•have been to rebid the bond contract. -. From the negative media
attention the Council has received, I think. my perception of bad political
judgement has been.confirmed
I also felt the decision reflected bad business judgement. I feel that, -
after five years with no written contract, it would have been in the best
; interests of the City and the RDA to rebid it. * I am sure that the price bid -.
five years ago was much higher than today's bid. By not rebidding the
contract, I think we give the impression of favoring a particular firm. The
bottom line for me was that to properly take care of the City and other
T . businesses in our community we needed to rebid the contract -
I would also remind you that at no time did I refer to specific people
when I stated that there was a rumor. If you will also recall, you and
Florence strongly denied any dealings with the principals; however, two hours
later you both volunteered having had some contact with the principals. I
• 89-72A
COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 21, 1989
t ,�'f
cannot emphasize enough that I do question your political and business
judgement on this issue, but not your morals or ethics.
As to your request for an investigation by the agency, I have some
problems. First, I believe the situation has gotten out of hand and that an
investigation will not get to the bottom of a rumor, especially since so many
people seem to be aware of it. Secondly since I am convinced no improper or
• illegal deal was made, I feel that the issue is moot. Further discussion
would be ineffective and detrimental to the real business of the City and will
take up too much time.
I consider the issue closed and will decline further press interviews or
• inquiries concerning the matter.
• Sincerely,
Tom Godfrey
Council Member
District 5
•
TG:ccr
•
•
•
•
•
•
89-72B
NG ANT ,,� �•.--, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING 6R OPERATIONS
• , PROFORMA !N i- '4'5 ^"r. . TRANSITIONAL.
ANSITIONAL. PF1
", 06 DEC 1988
OPERATING COST'„ +i�yVj�' L ,
Line Item ' .. PUM• Cost Units Year 1 ,, - Year: 2 • Year 3 a Year 4 Year 5 Total
Maine. Salaries 8. 62 lo 1, 655. 04 1, 704. 69 . • 1, 755. 883 1, 808. 50 1, 862. 75 , . 8, 786. B1
Maint Materials 6. 67 • 16 1, 260. 64 1, 319. 05 1, 358f:62- 1, 399. 37 1, 441. 35 6, 799. 03
• Meant Contracts x. 10. 32 16 1, 981. 44' 2, 040. 88 2, 102 10,. 2, 165. 16.... 2, 230. 11 • 10, 519. 6?
Other Maintenance :'- 3. 95 16 758. 40 .. ; .-. 781. 15� - 804. 58,, 828. 71 853. 571 4, 026. 41
Total Maintenance 5, 075. 52 5, 645. 77 6, 021' 13` x 6, 201. 74 . "' '. 6, 387. 78 • 30, 131. .94
Electricity ` ` 31 74 10 6, 094. OB 6, 276. 90 - 6, 465 20: '6, 659. 15 6, 858. 92 32, 354. 25
Gas 12 E4 ;, -:, 16 _ 2, 465. 28._;: 2, 539. 23 0 2, 615.i40:µ 2, 693. 86 2, 774. 67 13, 088. 44
•Dater/Sewer 17. 69 16 3, 396. 48 " 3, 498. 37" 3, 603 r32 •-' 3, 711. 41 -- 3, 822. 75 18, 032. 33
it h er 3. 21 16 616. 32 634. 80 653. 84- 673. 45 693. 65 3, 272. 06
Total Utilities `. 12, 572. 16 :. 12, 949. 30 13, 337 76.:r 13, 737. 87 14, 149 99 66, 747, OB
Reserve ;or.
Replace 25. 00 16 4, 800. 00 : '4, 944. 00---:' 5, 09232 `„ 5, 245. 08 5, 402."43 25, 483. 83
' Furnishincs' S3. 21 - 16 10, 216. 32 10, 522. 80_ 10, 838:48 - 11, 163. 63 -- 11, 498. 53 - 54, 239. 76
Total Capital E. p 15, 016. 32 15, 466..80 " 15, 930,80-^ 16► 408' 71 16, 900. 96 79, 723. 59
, AF, 4 ,,,,,- i
HA Admin. Salaries 15. 25 16 2, 528. 00 3, 015. 84 3, 106431 3, 199. 49 3, 295. 47 15, 545. 11
co. HA Admin. Other •• 15. 39 16 2, 954. 88 : 3, 043. 52 -- 3, 134 82 3, 228. 86 3, 325. 72 15, 687. 80
H c+v s i n A s s t. Salary 1 1. 11 36 2, 133. 12 2, 197. 1 1 2, 263i 02 2, 330. 91 2, 400. 83 11. 324. 99
V Accounting & Computer . 1 7. 05 16 3, 273. 60 3, 371. 80 3, 472.195 3, 577. 13 3, 684. 44 17, 379. 92
+„ Insurance - 7. 32 16 1, 405. 44 . 1, 447. 60•`' 1, 491`"02 1, 535. 75 1, 581. 82 7, 461. 63
n Total HA Admin. 12, 695. 04 13, 075. 87 13, 468;12_:- 13, 872. 14 14, 288. 28 • 67, 399. 45
at.Y
Support Serv, Admire 888. 50 16 16, 992. 00 17, 501. 76 18, 026. 81"— 18, 567. 61 19, 124. 63 90, 212. B1
Res dent Supervisor 130. 21 - 16 25, 000. 32 25, 750. 32 26, 522. 82 " 27, 318. 50 28, 138. 05 132, 730. 01
Total Support 41, 992. 32 43, 252. 08 44, 549, 63 45, 886. 11 47, 262_68 222, 942.�82
TOTAL. COST 87, 951. 36 90, 589. 82 93, 307:,44 96, 106. 57 98, 989. 69 466, 944. BB
• OPERATING REVENUE.,,:.
;e11-67:t.Ften4i). 75. 00 16 ci ;=4O0.-00. 14, 832. 00 15, 276 96 15, 735. 26 16, 207. 31 76, 451. 53
HUD-rangy 229 04 16 -::143,4975:%'8 43, 975. 68 43, 975. 68 43, 975. 66 43, 975. 68 219, 878. 40
• AI A'--r Cmttas 73. 60 16 ti'4'' 31 1'00 14, 555. 13 • 14, 991: 7B 15, 441. 53 15, 904. 77 75, 024. 41
Saa`tL1 - 7,Lunds SO 44 16 3I:5 444.'4% 17, 227. 01 19, 063. 02 20, 954. 10 22, 901. 93 95, 590. 54
TOTAL REVENUE
07, 951. 36 90, 589. 82 93, 307. 44 96, 106. 57 98, 989. 69 466, 944. 88
OPERATING VARIANCE - 0. 00 O. 00 . 0. 00 - O. 00 • 0. 00 O. 00
S•
H O
6
fir k` /( __ad
.�1 LNJ�_, a c z
tomvii zci wr
r
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _AKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on
Tuesday, March 21, 1989, at 6:00 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South
State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Sydney Fonnesbeck Tom Godfrey
Wayne Horrocks Alan Hardman Willie Stoler
Councilmember Kirk was absent.
Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler City Attorney, Kathryn Marshall,
City Recorder, and Lynda Domino, Chief Deputy Recorder, were present.
Councilmember Stoler presided at the meeting and Councilmember
Horrocks conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONIES and proclaiming Tuesday, March 21,
1989, to be Salt Lake City Day at
#1. The invocation was given Disneyland.
by Reverend Carol West, Mount
Tabor Lutheran Church. Councilmember Horrocks read a
joint resolution of the City Coun-
#2. The Council led the cil and Mayor commending Disney-
Pledge of Allegiance. land for their commitment to the
family and expressing appreciation
#3. Councilmember Godfrey and gratitude for their joint
moved and Councilmember Hardman effort with Coca-Cola and Delta
seconded to approve the minutes of Airlines to bring happiness to
the Salt Lake City Council for the children of all ages, especially
regular meeting held Tuesday, the children of Salt Lake City,
March 7, 1989, which motion car- Utah.
ried, all members present voted
aye. Councilmember Godfrey moved
(M 89-1) and Councilmember Fonnesbeck sec-
onded to adopt Resolution 43 of
#4a. The City Council and 1989, which motion carried, all
Mayor Palmer DePaulis presented a members present voted aye except
resolution of appreciation honor- Councilmember Bittner who was
ing Disneyland for their work with absent for the vote.
children in Salt Lake City. (R 89-1)
Fred Rawlins, representing #4b. The City Council and
Delta Airlines (Disneyland' s major Mayor Palmer DePaulis presented
carrier) , along with representa- the 1989 "Reading is FUNdamental"
tives from Disneyland and several awards. Mayor DePaulis along with
of the Disney characters were the Disney characters presented
present. The Disneyland represen- the awards to the children from
tatives presented Salt Lake City various Salt Lake City schools.
with a proclamation acknowledging
Salt Lake City' s support for
Disneyland in Southern California
89-73
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT ._AKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
COMMENTS Mr. Miller needed to get the best
deal and the public needed to be
#1. Several children from aware of their total investment.
the Jackson Elementary 5th Grade
Extended Learning Program pre- He suggested that several is-
sented the Council with infor- sues needed to be considered such
mation about the deteriorated con- as land costs, infrastructure
dition of sidewalks in the Euclid costs, shared parking revenue, the
area. light rail system, and how this
would help the Central Business
They said after conducting District. He pointed out that Mr.
two surveys of the area they found Miller's investment was $45 mil-
• that in some areas the sidewalks lion and the public' s was $20
were so bad people could possibly million plus. He asked how the
fall and get hurt so they walked citizens could keep abreast of the
in the street, in places the comparative data being collected
sidewalks were not even visible, on both locations by the Redevel-
and at some points there were opment Agency and the criteria
loose rocks and pebbles on the used to compare that data.
sidewalks. The children passed
around pictures showing the condi- Councilmember Horrocks said
tion of the sidewalks. that every member on the City
Council was cognizant of the needs
These children asked the of the city and citizenry. He
Council for their help to improve said they were also cognizant that
the Euclid area. the tax base was shrinking. He
said there would be a lot of plan-
#2. J. Maurice Clayton, 2427 ning and public input and said the
Emerson Avenue, said he repre- Council appreciated Mr. Puriri ' s
sented the Citizens Golf Committee concerns. Councilmember Horrocks
and he distributed copies of a re- asked Dick Turpin, RDA, to explain
port which identified and ad- the procedure regarding the site
dressed issues which he said were selection.
discriminatory, unfair, ill-con-
ceived and detrimental to the Mr. Turpin outlined his
city. recommended selection criteria:
1 ) Mr. Miller' s choice of sites;
He asked the Mayor and 2 ) land availability and cost; 3 )
Council to acquaint themselves parking availability and cost; 4 )
with the data and then provide a site development costs; 5 ) impact
forum or meeting with the Citizen of the arena on downtown trans-
Golf Committee in order to eval- portation systems; 6 ) consistency
uate and take action upon the of the location with existing city
information in the report. He plans.
asked that a meeting be arranged
no later than the week of April He said all of this informa-
10, 1989. tion was currently being gathered
by consultants or staff. He said
#3. Ra Puriri, 258 No. Main, the Salt Lake City Planning De-
commented about the proposed partment would comment on consis-
sports arena. He said this deci- tency with city plans, the Trans-
sion process was important and was portation Department would comment
a singular opportunity to gather on the impact on the transporta-
support from the public. He said tion systems and the remaining
89-74
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT —ICE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
information would be addressed by #1. RE: Approving the ap-
consultants. pointment of Paul Osborn to the
Community Development Advisory
Councilmember Hardman asked Committee.
if there would be a public hearing (I 89-2)
once the information was gathered.
Mr. Turpin said there would be a #2. RE: Approving the ap-
public meeting but there was no pointment of Karen Wikstrom to the
legal requirement for a formal Housing Advisory and Appeals
public hearing. He said the RDA Board.
could take public comment at their (I 89-6)
regular meeting.
#3. RE: Adopting Resolution
Councilmember Hardman said he 42 of 1989 authorizing the exe-
was concerned about perceptions cution of an Interlocal Cooper-
and asked how soon the information ation Agreement approving a con-
would be available to the public. tract amendment between Salt Lake
Mr. Turpin said the information City and the Redevelopment Agency
gathered to date would be avail- designating the Agency as the
able the Friday prior to the RDA' s Local Urban Homestead Agency.
April 6th meeting (March 31 ) . (C 89-115 )
Councilmember Bittner said #4. RE: Approving the
because of concerns about the site appointment of Dan Bethel to the
selection process she suggested Planning Commission.
that the RDA open a public comment (I 89-5)
process, perhaps with a newspaper
ad indicating that the RDA would #5. RE: Adopting Resolution
accept written comments or tele- 37 of 1989 authorizing the execu-
phone calls so they could become tion of an Interlocal Cooperation
part of the record and considered Agreement between Salt Lake City
at the beginning of the process. Corporation and Utah Department of
She wanted people to have the Transportation to include protect-
opportunity to give input before ing and adjusting the City' s
the decision was made. culinary water facilities in
connection with improvements con-
Councilmember Horrocks re- templated by UDOT from I-215 to
iterated that the RDA meeting was Knudsen' s Corner to Wasatch Boule-
always public. Mr. Turpin agreed yard.
that placing an ad in the news- (C 89-104)
paper was a good idea and indi-
cated that he would follow through #6. RE: Adopting Resolution
as soon as possible. 38 of 1989 authorizing the execu-
(G 89-8) tion of an Interlocal Cooperation
Agreement between Salt Lake City
Corporation and Salt Lake County
CONSENT AGENDA providing for the exchange of fire
protection services within initial
Councilmember Bittner moved action areas as established by the
and Councilmember Hardman seconded Fire Chief of each jurisdiction.
to approve the consent agenda, (C 89-103)
which motion carried, all members
present voted aye. #7. RE: Set a date for a
public hearing to be held Tuesday,
89-75
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT __SCE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
April 4, 1989, at 6:20 p.m. to #2. RE: A resolution autho-
obtain public comment concerning rizing the execution of an
Petition No. 400-662 submitted as Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
a legislative action to rezone between Salt Lake City Corporation
property located between 500 and and the Housing Authority of Salt
600 East and Wilmington and Lake City for renewal of low-rent
Stringham Avenues from "C-1" to housing program of the Housing
"R-3A" classification. Authority of Salt Lake City.
(P 88-346)
ACTION: Councilmember God-
#8. RE: Set a date for a frey moved and Councilmember Sto-
public hearing to be held Tuesday, ler seconded to adopt Resolution
April 18, 1989, at 6:20 p.m. , to 40 of 1989, which motion carried,
obtain public comment concerning all members present voted aye.
Petition No. 400-705 submitted by (C 89-106)
Scott McNeil of McNeil Engineering
requesting Salt Lake City to #3. RE: A resolution author-
rezone property located on the izing the execution of an
southeast corner of 700 North and Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
Redwood Road from "R-2A" to "B-3" between Salt Lake City Corporation
classification. and the Housing Authority of Salt
(P 89-92) Lake City establishing the funding
program for the Transitional
Housing Program of the Housing
NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS Authority of Salt Lake City.
#1. RE: A resolution declar- ACTION: Councilmember God-
ing the intention of Salt Lake frey moved and Councilmember Hard-
city to construct improvements on man seconded to adopt Resolution
or adjoining California Avenue and 41 of 1989, which motion carried,
all other miscellaneous work all members present voted aye.
necessary to complete the improve- (C 89-105 )
ments; to create Salt Lake City,
Utah California Avenue Special
Improvement District No. 38-808; UNFINISHED BUSINESS
to defray the cost and expenses of
a portion of said Improvement #1. RE: An ordinance recog-
District by special assessments to nizing the adoption of amendment
be levied against the property 15 to the Master Annexation Policy
benefited by such improvements; to declarations; extending the limits
provide Notice of Intention to of Salt Lake City to include the
authorize such improvements and to City Creek Annexation, zoning the
set Tuesday, May 9, 1989 , at 6:20 same Preservation "P-1" by amend-
p.m. for protests against such ing the use district map as adopt-
improvements or the creation of ed by Section 21. 14.020 of the
said District; to authorize adver- Salt Lake City Code; and amending
tisement of construction bids and the Salt Lake City Council Dis-
related matters. trict Boundary Map.
ACTION: Councilmember God- ACTION: Councilmember Bitt-
frey moved and Councilmember Sto- ner moved and Councilmember Fon-
ler seconded to adopt Resolution nesbeck seconded to adopt Ordi-
39 of 1989, which motion carried, nance 11 of 1989, which motion
all members present voted aye.
(Q 89-2)
89-76
PROCEEDINGS L._ THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _ .KE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
carried, all members present voted citizen input on general housing
aye. and community development needs
for consideration by Community
DISCUSSION: Councilmember Development Block Grant staff and
Hardman asked LeRoy Hooton, direc- the Mayor prior to submission of
tor of public utilities, if this the Mayor' s annual Community
maintained and preserved the Development Block Grant recommen-
multiple use aspect of City Creek. dations to the City Council .
Mr. Hooton said this was correct
and said that the same activities ACTION: Councilmember God-
that were permitted in the past frey moved and Councilmember Sto-
would continue to be permitted in ler seconded to close the public
the future under the annexation. hearing, which motion carried, all
(P 88-395) members present voted aye.
DISCUSSION: Stephanie Loker,
PUBLIC HEARINGS capital planning and programming,
said this was a required HUD
#1 RE: A public hearing hearing related to general com-
scheduled for 6: 20 p.m. to obtain munity development and housing
comment concerning and consider needs. She said the purpose of
adopting an ordinance amending the hearing was to get input about
Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 39 of the problems and opportunities
1988 adopting the budget of Salt existing in the city which Com-
lake City, Utah, for the Fiscal munity Development Block Grant
Year beginning July 1, 1988, and funds could be used to solve.
ending June 30, 1989 .
She said they had about 96
ACTION: Councilmember project proposals totalling more
Godfrey moved and Councilmember than $9 million and this year' s
Stoler seconded to close the pub- HUD allocation to Salt Lake was
lic hearing, which motion carried, $3, 947,000. She said the capital
all members present voted aye. planning staff came up with
$200, 000 in slippage from closed
Councilmember Bittner moved projects which would be added to
and Councilmember Hardman seconded this amount.
to adopt Ordinance 10 of 1989
amending Ordinance 39 of 1988 She thanked the Community
adopting the budget of Salt Lake Development Advisory Committee
City, Utah, for the Fiscal Year (CDAC) for all the work they did
beginning July 1, 1988, and ending in relation to the project re-
June 30, 1989, which motion car- quests and their recommendations
ried, all members present voted to the Mayor. She said city staff
aye. also reviewed the projects and
made recommendations to the Mayor.
DISCUSSION: No one from city
staff reported on this item and She said staff would be
there were no comments from the meeting with the Mayor in the next
public. two weeks and then he would
(B 88-5) present his recommendations to the
Council at either the April llth
or 18th meeting. She said the
#2. RE: A public hearing Council would then give their
scheduled for 6:30 p.m. to obtain
89-77
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _IKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
preliminary recommendation regard-
ing the 15th Year CD money on May Mary Lee Allen, 364 E. 700
2nd and hopefully the Council So. , spoke on behalf of Housing
would make their final decision Outreach Rental Program. She said
on May 16th. they dealt a lot with emergency
housing and were having more
The following people spoke: difficulty finding suitable hous-
ing since units were closed for
Dr. Stephen Ratcliffe, 300 being substandard. She said last
No. 1300 W. , said he was a family year they served 2,300 people and
physician and medical director of half were from Salt Lake. She
Salt Lake Community Health Cen- asked the Council to help them
ters. He said they were asking find suitable housing.
for funds to assist in building a
new center to replace the North- Max Smith, 357 Pierpont, said
west Community Health Center. He he was on the R/UDAT Housing Sub-
said they served the medically committee and asked the Council to
indigent of Salt Lake City and consider improving the old ware-
were serving about 16, 000 patients houses in the Pierpont area and
a year. He said the current using them for housing. He said
facilities lacked laboratories and this would house people and create
a pharmacy and a new center would neighborhoods. He asked the Coun-
be a full-service center. He also cil to fund housing to the great-
said they could receive a $1. 5 est extent possible.
million loan contingent upon them
obtaining 25% funding for the new Patrick Poulin, 210 Rio
center and the CDBG funds would be Grande St. , executive director of
a significant portion. the Traveler' s Aid Society, said
the number of people seeking
Mike McKendrick, 328 W. 700 services at the homeless shelter
No. , said the area of 700 North had more than doubled. He said
from 300 to 400 West needed curb they were better able to serve
and gutter and street improve- them but the number of homeless
ments. He said none of the resi- was increasing. He encouraged the
dents had the financial means to Council to assist with funding for
pay for the improvements. the shelter so they could provide
services to help get people into
Erlinda Davis, 358 W. 500 housing. He also encouraged the
No. , asked if $20, 000 could be Council to look at the city' s
used to clean up the area north of housing problems and fund trans-
the dog pound on Beck Street. She itional housing-type programs.
said this area would be more
visually appealing to people Councilmember Horrocks asked
coming into the city. about the resource center. Mr.
Poulin said they provided emer-
Lorille Miller, 548 N. Colum- gency shelter which included beds,
bus St. , asked that money be used showers, a laundry, a medical
to maintain the urban forest and clinic, job service, food-stamp
also said the area by West High outreach, counseling services,
looked desolate and needed some community education programs,
trees. Councilmember Fonnesbeck housing references, and on-site
suggested that Ms. Miller also employment projects. ' He said St.
approach the school board about Vincent DePaul provided lunches
landscaping. and the Salvation Army was going
89-78
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _iKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
to start serving dinner seven funds so programs could work to-
nights a week. gether. He said along with a
planning process there needed to
Kathy Sheaffer, 1385 Indiana be follow through for subsequent
Ave. , Neighborhood Housing Ser- years. He referred to block re-
vices, said she echoed the previ- design projects and indicated that
ous comments about housing and they may take more than one year
encouraged the Council to put as to complete so there needed to be
much money as possible into hous- commitment to longer-term pro-
ing because there is a need. jects.
Stephen Hemingway, 1336 S. B. T. Price, 1028 W. Euclid
200 East, said the South Central Ave. , indicated that funds needed
Community was having problems with to be used to help landlords who
street gangs. He said the commu- were providing low-income housing.
nity council suggested two ways to
eliminate this problem. One was Jim Jensen, 567 W. 300 No. ,
to provide something for these director of the Salt Lake Boys and
people to do and the other idea Girls Clubs, said last year when
was to eliminate areas of congre- the Salt Lake Boys and Girls Clubs
gation. He said they submitted an received funding the Council
application for a South Central requested that they increase the
Community Center and also suggest- staff and program hours for the
ed opening Edison Street and high risk boys and girls, which
making it a thoroughfare. they had done. He said there was
a 30% decrease in juvenile arrest
Kim Anderson, 768 N. Redwood rates within the Jackson and
Rd. , chairman of the Community Guadalupe police area. He asked
Development Advisory Committee, the Council to consider funding
said the Mayor and City Council again this year because of the in-
would see all the projects which creased street-gang activity. He
had been submitted whether CDAC said they would like to be able to
approved them or not. He said increase program activities so the
this year CDAC focused on main- youth would have an alternative.
taining, improving, and/or creat- He also said they would also like
ing vital neighborhoods; preserv- to help with anti-graffiti pro-
ing existing low/moderate-income grams.
housing stock; and providing
amenities to improve marketability Roger Borgenicht, 20 So. 1200
of neighborhoods. He said CDAC E. , said there was a loss of
was suggesting that more funds be single-room occupancy units, a
spent specifically in neighbor- loss of low and moderate income
hoods instead of general city-wide units, and a loss of apartment
projects, which they felt should units in the east downtown neigh-
be funded with city-wide funds. borhood. He said he would like
He said CDAC recommendations would the Council to take a proactive
be more neighborhood oriented stand to prevent the growing
towards the lower income people. homelessness that occurs when the
community loses these units. He
Ron Love, 1073 E. 600 So. , also referred to the blight that
East Central Community Council, vacant and boarded up homes
said the CDBG funds should be part brought to neighborhoods .
of a plan and needed to fit in
with the expenditure of other
89-79
PROCEEDINGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT AE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, MARCH 21, 1989
John Anderson, 629 Lake St. ,
said it was difficult for land-
lords to provide and maintain low-
income housing and he asked the
Council to consider using CDBG
money for loans to repair low-
income buildings. He said banks
wouldn' t loan money to repair
buildings in "undesirable" loca-
tions and also said that bad
tenants should be held responsible
for their damages. He thought
funding for landlords to repair
low-income housing units should be
a priority. He said he ap-
proached the RDA two years ago
about a loan for a new roof on an
apartment building but they wanted
him to completely bring the build-
ing up to code.
Councilmember Fonnesbeck said
there was a change in the RDA' s
requirement to completely bring a
building up to code. She said the
RDA couldn't loan money unless the
owner was willing to repair all
life-safety problems but there
were some exceptions to all the
code requirements. She suggested
that Mr. Anderson check again with
the RDA.
(T 89-7)
The meeting adjourned at 7: 50
p.m.
COUNCIL CHAIRPERSON
CITY RECORDER
89-80
PROCEEDINGS . THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT _ .KE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 23, 1989
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in regular session on
Thursday, March 23, 1989, at 7:40 p.m. in Suite 300, City Hall, 324 South
State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Florence Bittner Alan Hardman
Wayne Horrocks Willie Stoler
Councilmembers Fonnesbeck, Godfrey and Kirk were absent.
Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, and Kathryn
Marshall, City Recorder, were also absent.
Council Chair Stoler presided at and conducted the meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Bittner moved
and Councilmember Horrocks sec-
onded to approve the consent agen-
da, which motion carried, all
members present voted aye.
#1. RE: Set a date for a
public hearing to be held Tuesday,
April 18, 1989, at 6:30 p.m. to
obtain public comment concerning
Petition No. 400-662 submitted as
a legislative action to rezone
property located between 500 and
600 East and Wilmington and
Stringham Avenues from "C-1" to
"R-3A" classification.
(P 88-346)
The meeting adjourned at 7:45
p.m.
COUNCIL CHAIR
CITY RECORDER
89-81
,)`
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. o t L 9 ORDINANCE _ _
(Russell and Olwine Annexation and Zoning
pursuant to Petition No. 400-595-88)
AN ORDINANCE RECOGNIZING THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT 5-F TO
THE MASTER ANNEXATION POLICY DECLARATIONS; EXTENDING THE LIMITS
OF SALT LAKE CITY TO INCLUDE THE RUSSELL AND OLWINE ANNEXATION,
ZONING THE SAME COMMERCIAL "C-3A" , BY AMENDING THE USE DISTRICT
MAP AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 21 . 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE;
AND AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP.
- WHEREAS, Petition No. 400-595-88 was filed with the City
Recorder of Salt Lake City, together with a plat showing the
tract of land to be annexed hereafter to be known as the "Russell
and Olwine Annexation" , requesting that_ the contiguous,
irregularly shaped parcel of approximately . 66 acres of
unincorporated territory lying between 1100 East and Richmond
Street along the north side of 3300 South in Salt Lake County be
taken within the city limits of Salt Lake City Corporation to
extend the City' s limits; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by a majority of the owners
of real property and the owners of more than one-third in value
of all real property, as shown by the last assessment roles,
situated in the tract hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the orderly expansion of the
City' s boundaries, the City has previously adopted a Master
Annexation Policy Declaration on June 20, 1979 . The proposed
annexation lies within Study Area No. 5 of said Declaration and
is the specific subject of Amendment No. 5-F of said Declaration
•
which was approved after_ favorable Planning Commission review;
and.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, after examining
the petition and having the petition favorably reviewed by the
various -departments of the City and the Planning Commission, and
having accepted the petition by Resolution No. 88 of 1988, and •
having considered the petition at a publicly advertised hearing
held September 6, 1988, and after finding the proposed annexation
be consistent and in keeping with the City' s Master Annexation
Policy Declaration for Study Area No. 5 and Amendment No. 5-F,
the Council voted by two-thirds or greater vote of its
membership, in favor of the annexation; and
•
' WHEREAS, no objection or contest to such annexation or '
amendment has been filed as required by law or is presently
pending;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt
Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Area. That the city limits of Salt Lake City
be, and• the same hereby are, enlarged and extended so as to
include the following . 66 acre parcel of land located between •
1100 East and Richmond Street along the north side of 3300 South
in Salt. Lake County, Utah:
Beginning at a point on the North line of 3300 South
Street S 89° 47 ' 10" W 253.29 feet and North 7.0 feet
from the Southeast Corner of Lot 1, Block 27, Ten Acre
Plat A, Big Field Survey. Said point of beginning is
also S 89° 47 ' 10" W 286.16 feet and North 40.0 feet TeLL,59
from a Salt Lake County Monument at the intersection $'''
of 3300 South and 1300 East Streets (Basis of Bearing s4
being S 89° 47 ' 10" W along the centerline of 3300
South Street between said county monument and a point
0.4 feet North and 1.17 feet West of a Salt Lake City
-2-
Monument at 1100 East _Street) ; and running thence S
89° 47 ' 10" W 72. 719 feet along the North line of 3300
South Street; thence N 34° 21 ' 04" W 34.333 feet;
thence N 31° 43 ' 20" W 193.410 feet; thence N 89° 47 '
10" E 193 . 788 feet; thence South 193.314 feet to the
point of beginning. Contains 0.595 acres.
SECTION 2. Zoning. Be it further ordained and declared
that the above Annexation is hereby zoned Commercial "C-3A" and
the Use District Map as adopted by Section 21. 14. 020 of the Salt
Lake City Code relating to the boundaries of use districts shall
be, and the same hereby is amended by the addition of this
Annexation zoned Commercial "C-3A" .
SECTION 3. City Council Map. The Salt Lake City Council
District Map is hereby amended to include this Annexation in
Council District 7 as specified on such map.
SECTION -4. General Jurisdiction. Be. it further ordained
and declared that the tract of land described above in Section 1
shall henceforth be within the corporate limits of Salt Lake City
Corporation. All ordinances, jurisdictions, rules and
obligations of, or pertaining to, Salt Lake City are extended
over and made applicable and pertinent to this tract of land; and
the streets, blocks, alleys and public ways of said tract shall
be controlled and governed by the ordinances, rules and
regulations of Salt Lake City in that behalf. The monuments of
the City Engineer shall henceforth be taken therein as the
standards of location and distances of said land.
SECTION 5. Filings and Notice. Upon the passage and
publication of this Ordinance, the Recorder of Salt Lake City is
hereby directed to file with the County Recorder of Salt Lake
County a copy of the approved annexation plan or map, duly
-3-
certified and acknowledged, together with a certified copy of
this Ordinance. The City Recorder is further directed to provide
notice to the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to applicable
state law.
SECTION 6. Publication and Effect. This Ordinance shall
take effect upon the date of its first publication. The City
Recorder is instructed not to publish this Ordinance until an
annexation plat prepared by a registered professional engineer or
- surveyor at the developer' s expense has been submitted to the
City meeting all City standards for such a document and has been
signed by the Mayor.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of • , 1989. •
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
APPROVED •4C-r
CITY RECORDER ____
Transmitted. to the Mayor of
Mayor's Action: Approved Vetoed
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
BRB:pp
-4-
0 88-1
/ • . P 88-194
y:. y z SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE . =:,:r " .,, ."
No. 60 of 19810
(Russell and Olwine Annexation . and Zoning
pursuant to Petition No. 400-595-88)
`. AN ORDINANCE RECOGNIZING THE ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT 5-F TO
THE MASTER ANNEXATION POLICY DECLARATIONS; EXTENDING THE LIMITS
r
t OF SALT LAKE CITY TO INCLUDE THE RUSSELL AND OLWINE ANNEXATION,
ti
ZONING THE SAME COMMERCIAL "C-3A" , BY AMENDING THE USE DISTRICT
.
MAP AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 21 . 14.020 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE;
y AND AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP.
f WHEREAS, Petition No. 400-595-88 was filed with the City
iRecorder of Salt Lake City, together with a plat showing the
tract of land to be annexed hereafter to be known as the "Russell
k and Olwine Annexation" , requesting that the contiguous,`
irregularly shaped parcel of approximately . 66 acres of
unincorporated territory lying between 1100 East and Richmond
Street along the north side of 3300 South in Salt Lake County be
• taken within the city limits of Salt Lake City Corporation to
C. extend the City' s limits; and
WHEREAS, the petition was signed by a majority of the owners
P
of real property and the owners of more than one-third in value
of all real property, as shown by the last assessment roles,
situated in the tract hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the orderly expansion of the
il
City's boundaries, the City has previously adopted a Master
Annexation Policy Declaration on June 20, 1979. The proposed
annexation lies within Study Area No. 5 of said Declaration and
A
is the specific subject of Amendment No. 5-F of said Declaration
- - which was -approved_after- favorable. Planning Commission review;=.. =:''-• 0
and r.
f-- WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, - after examining
the petition and having the petition favorably reviewed by the
various departments of the City and the Planning Commission, and
having accepted the petition by Resolution No. 88 of 1988, and
having considered the petition at a publicly advertised hearing
held September 6, 1988, and after finding the proposed annexation
to be consistent and in keeping with the City's Master Annexation
Policy Declaration for Study Area No. 5 and Amendment No. 5-F,
the Council voted by two-thirds or greater vote of its
membership, in favor of the annexation; and
WHEREAS, no objection or contest to such annexation or
amendment has been filed as required by law or is presently
pending;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt
Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Area. That the city limits of Salt Lake City
be, and the same hereby are, enlarged and extended so as to
include the following . 66 acre parcel of land located between
1100 East and Richmond Street along the north side of 3300 South
in Salt Lake County, Utah:
Commencing 16 Rods West 92.1 Rods South & 286. 16 feet Cnye
West from the East,-I/4 Corner f Section 29, T1S R1E at
Salt Lake Meridian, West 60.36 eet, N 32° W 267.3
feet, N 89°42 ' 201. 93 feet, South2229.27 feet to the
Point of Be ping. Contains 0.66 acres.
SECTION 2. Zoning. Be it further ordained and declared .Capt243
that the above Annexation is hereby zoned Commercial "C-3A" and
-2-
y
•
r.:
the Use District Map as adopted -by Section 21•.14.020-of_the Salt
Lake City Code relating to the boundaries of use districts shall
be, and the same hereby is amended by the addition of this
Annexation zoned Commercial "C-3A" .
SECTION 3. City Council Map. The Salt Lake City Council
District Map is hereby amended to include this Annexation in
Council District 7 as specified on such map.
SECTION 4. General Jurisdiction. Be it further ordained
and declared that the tract of land described above in Section 1
shall henceforth be within the corporate limits of Salt Lake City
Corporation. All ordinances, jurisdictions, rules and
obligations of, or pertaining to, Salt Lake City are extended
over and made applicable and pertinent to this tract of land; and
the streets, blocks, alleys and public ways of said tract shall
be controlled and governed by the ordinances, rules and
regulations of Salt Lake City in that behalf. The monuments of
the City Engineer shall henceforth 'be taken therein as the
standards of location and distances of said land.
SECTION 5. Filings and Notice. Upon the passage and
publication of this Ordinance, the Recorder of Salt Lake City is
hereby directed to file with the County Recorder of Salt Lake
County a copy of the approved annexation plan or map, duly
certified and acknowledged, together with a certified copy of
this Ordinance. The City Recorder is further directed to provide
notice to the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to applicable
state law.
-3-
t :.
li ion •.
SECTION 6. Pub cat and•.Effect. This Ordinance^shall•. ,
take effect upon the date _of.its :first publication. �,-.The City
Recorder is instructed not to publish this Ordinance until an
annexation plat prepared by a registered professional engineer or
surveyor at the developer's expense has been submitted to the
City meeting all City standards for such a document and has been
signed by the Mayor.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,
this 13th day of September 1989
CHAIRPERSON
•
ATTEST _ . • " (�
/421d4.4471Z1---
C T RDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on September 13, 1988
Mayor's Action: 9/13/88 Approved Vetoed
•
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CI Y EC ER •
BRB:pp
( SE )
Bill of 19
Published:
•
-4-
t. % .. • .,::f::•• I.:,;;:',111:74—",s;{...•,':410:P.Of:—NOsig;. 14.0gHit')
:.• i r. •,),L,:a, :,:,..:..,ii.,'1,,! it. t.ta 1' kl 'r.'t.i'.4!1
. c. 1..c • i'::: 1 '.!•i•,'' .t, ,,, • • lif:1,„i.„. ,AiPrIrt,t 4s..04.,,4,'Zi,-,,1).'',13'ti',i
'7,.'••.. ....'•%•• ' •4.:•.4.:,1 If S.r•Ir 4. •,'S...!V • TtI4eloti,)1.4.4.1f:Al:"./i., !•',
.,, . • * . :. • e, ;::',-, ,! 4,:;;Y: . '.1°4.'1 '''' +,4•,: (‘. 4. 1,,i 0tvis, ig• .t• .,a•
• .., ;,,, ,l, ii;;,..., ;;-,,, JoN••,,..i 4.v.4 .•..P,...±,..,
:'..• -. .
.,,..
.•.•
.•.
,
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
,,i,V,,C,,,s‘I,•,,.','i,,,. •'•'''„:..'•,,,,.,',:!,,
;4,',;',...'..;,;,.!, •,m$1!..;.,i..-.-,„.I1,1,,c7',,,.o,),1.wP,..'.,s r„i„.i1,iii...(.I,!iv:,i,•„f.:,q':0k 4,r,1-k„1-4.1!,.,:,!..,,:.,r•4.1,,,5•;,1.4.g,4.0,.:,'•#.- 1 1l1-i,'',j zt1.,iA•,,t i-1*,4.)y,a.„l t„,,r,I•,a,,-,,„s.1,,e„.r lt'.i0T•0,i-Ni0c4l,4r:-1
1
1 ,' 114
t 1", - ',/ • ' • ''4,'.:,,c -r:. IA.11,c
: ''' j— I '',!. , r-,-.., N±tc.-•,,±.0 . k.r'lLtim..,1.441,.,.3, rrr.,?,c
' •,., ' ;I.or.-t ,.4),..,-,1;,?„,4,14 . A • i ,,v,„,,.,,,,,i,,,.:,,,.,,
. .,
,:. ,,:.... 1, JOIIN El...WOOD NEFF, a Registered i Land Surveyo.r.,!.., as ,i,;-•,;., .vi .ii.,)-•, ?,!•1‘c " . .• Iti •irly,.,01-).!,1.
',.. . S• .' ;*.1 ' ii.1 1.• 14,f r`'.:t
prescribed tinder the laws of the State of,. Utah and : holding`,1::p''''' trt .-1',,,,:!-I.i %A :•.• ..: 4 ,,loivIS,,,c'v:
!.. '. . !Is'.
:.1,.. . . , Certificate Number 1101, (lo hereby certify. that this is a . true and 1.0A Ortr'''oa";.12,. )0 ; e *ie341-.''''Iti..2.i1/243.?4,
;;‘,04 irri4i:2:11 i' •• 0.4' .i'7.i.lr'VA,Ve4Y,;i:61-,
.s-,., , . •
. • correct map showing the area to be annexed to!:'Salt Lake:.City. and N44 • .kg'41,.ri,. l',.....iis tt,.411k-s,<4!.;• ,k4.4,
n!,,• '. , ,, ,
/;,,, .... ,. ii.,... . ,i-,..i,,,, -.3.', .0 • `1,)•A ;,i,..r1.-to ,,.. e..,
more particularly described as follows: - c.,1:;.
1?"::
.:; .. •'.:1,...:,'.;..•:. ..• •. • • ,:. , ,. '1..;.'....:,, . !•,IIf,.-,:.' ' !.-,'•_%;,;:,'. t:.,:.s.,..:,,....:,), N,'t1',i,!7,1!''.t), .O,.Z'rc.'!6';..i11tkP:,),•4i 6 t
: C? -s...1..,t4;M!1•4,t)rr'.i1:,,r'eP1‘.1(ve5;i't''„',}+1h:7,,„1.;.7.0:;,--;:,1•;i,:,,‘/-tiiyrtll,xi.e444 1'(-!:',•',.••• - ' • • ,,. . ,04' '.:,;!;'.1. ,',11,. ($1,,1 .15v,:q.,!‘ffi-!2;.e-ii.q‘ 1 4.4?".51.1, 11:111f,F.f;
. .,
. •:'• . V. : :.,. : .. t,;.,,,.,..1',.t.:.:is'!-e6ti.,t);.•15:41.4;i4 IV. 3.4kit'-'fi.rii,10i1VI'''..)J
1
• .
'. -)1*.•:.•4.i.,I; :4,.',.-4.7''.I'V ' 1.-1,1%; g„-Nit`,14LM•3'-...`;'±• ,
•. ,, , , i,.. ,,). ,,, •1;•,.,,,,•:,;:4,„Jpgt.,At;,,,,A..,.,t-ri 41.40,1}•±7,±ti,5 :4,2.,...,
. : •,. i •.'"'•- •:-,'t'' ''., iiY4$i ‘'. 1.,-•..‘., ;.',.,::::t,f.,,t,.,?./. -14•; i1*.;f• ...',(1!`.. • . .:,-. .;i`.:..i,.. r,-;;,J....,,,ze.,.;.km, r."...'4'.,:ilPt.lii1",,...°,4 ../lit:;i4.1, 01''.4'i!j
, •• • ,i j'i,
1.1. . . .'.'''. '''.'''Yi44 Ilr'Viir4?rit.% 4§ • ' ', l'.....•.,. ,Ai.G.. , .
Beginning at a point on the North line of 3300 So th ‘Street'',P,1 '''.,P;o::;ov,,ili.414 k•-"4.-f;'t, Oe'i'',..‘i is.Lii' t•t,':,'!.'"t' t 4 &l. 1-1,•': l'V'ArrOi'-,
S 89° 47' 10" W 253.29 feet and North 7.0 feet from the.,Southeast
Corner of Lot 1, Block 27, Ten Acre Plat .. , .Big Field Survey.H•Said Of''r '..'r';„,t-',4i11?0,rii., '• 2741tit'';15;;',i1'4.:ri.'4:'''!;
. . .,:s. 4 point of beginning is also S 89° 47' 10" ' W . .286.16 feet i'and North 4'1:
•
•$S ‘ r47,-,,,e•, ., c-,
33G0 South and 1300 East Streets (Basis of Be S89
•_::
a'rIng being :247';',',,,,,'"u
, -.A.,..,:z,,,. . •,,,.,...,,,,,... .,./.4,J .P. A .,1;ilti 1!...i.r/1
10" W along the centerline of 3300 outh Street between , said ,.,.,-,4,14,,ek,,,.4,.4.. ltiv4,141, ,,-.5•42.1k,v,...4,14,,,,icrv,1,0%
• • • ) . ,
...
county monument and a point 0.4 feet No th and:.:,":1.17 feet; West ,.of).a ,Y.t,.k.*t,-_,'11-414,%„•?:iii.."%10-Pt.,)J." ; -.,:u1,40,c;,%.21,S),.0,19
Salt Lake City Monument at 1100 East Street); i.apd running. thence SA:,‘,;;;'''f,..4,,,1:1..1'
. • •
..,,.,........' ,,- 89° 47' 10" W 72.719 feet along the North kline of 3300 •Southl ,4,-;:t 1.1-, SI{ ttlI111 i'-'71f9gatl,tb\
34° 21' II. 0- 43' 20" ii.l't iii k f'714`4014;111PPFII.'t
Street; thence N 04" W 34.333 feet; t ence N 31 .. : I ... 1:1.,,•,,-4,,,.„• ;g,,,•,;:,
;:.:-. ..- . •'. :... • . . '. ,,:i;:fx- ,41--,.,..„.i. 1; ., •N•rt..11,...,.,-,:r:1,,,.io
•,:. i .... •..c. . W 193.410 feet; thence N 89° 47' ID' E 193.788 feet; thence South 1.`..":-., leo,i, a ,f. 5 . 4F•44.4il-17401•.14.1,,'\
r?::.• , 1 4* : ' , .L. • WYr,f 1,... 10* ,,.,I! • rh.3,4'4 ,...4,Avo,,,tTA
:::•.,?:".. . . -•,,,V4:-• . 193.314 feet to the point of beginning. Contains0.595 acres.. .!•,•,.:! 1',,„.r t .±.•;J,A-,.• •e.. -1, 1;,1 • I 111*.f*,,,r',J±4,.
01. .4±,-"Pf•i ;. 'ci!ti• i nig. 4 , ,,,,,., '-.,,,, ti ,t,):
../,,:.::-• / ;I'V'il''.ni!,t,,LiI;. :,'I!/...,.. :':,641. ,r,kfk •It ! 4e,;41:7'1 4'1,,,,,,
' •
4.-:•— • . ,..; • .:1.• in''
:. -,..': ••• Ce.i
,...: 1;.I r 4,:...,:i t 1 0 4:1,4 '''',o4;1 Illi • .i.,. 41 t4.4.4 Its, .0,•' r 7.,0'. •.:' '?AV,. ; •'4ri' 0, 4' ; 4 4 •P'.6,''',(11 . . ')'
.,',• : :,..,.' . 1 1 j.
, ' • , ... ' :: li°n s; I 1 '..-- -..
6 ...;:ivil,,,,,*, :
... ..
. ..
, - J..- -1. r)-:,1`CIV t A ''tr'^kr,. kir 0 • •
DATE JOHN ELWOOD NEFF ,,,4111L.41 '
.., , . . .
, ..,z 11;, ?,,i ..'I ,!trf
Registered Engineer ,and: La d i,ord:r-.4. 4,4 ..., •:, •is, ?t,i% .
Surveyor -'Utah CertI4#:, 11011i 1. ,,t'N • !±1! ' ''' ,..r..40.:,[Attt. tli.kilt4
. • •. . i r'1,7;•,. ,1,',1 4,t;!. 14114. .'115,X,,I,,,: ••;••.,.',•11 ,,,,, cy.4, ;:, 111,N .,4 1i.,:,,i.
.,. , .
. - • .6,... ,k.;;1; ',!: ,Jr•i'01.1!i r,k , 4.1fity .,,, ,.1 ..,r.a/1,-1,:',..,--rv,P. T tl
, . , \cope( ano• 4Nk: Iii'lif;:l. i r1,4 :!z: 1:,,, ;'1 ; ,i -.et
. '1: 11.1'2,1i1'34: L N:04: -c-Ni.. ' '' '''. ',•1 NA.. . ,... ' i
, . ;,' . 44"4 "I'J'' ' • IV ' !&:111ii:'' 't ,...;i4i;.•.4 i',•: •, ' :10 ..,',Ativ,• ',,,','
•,, , , , • „ it, N„I;., ., .:,,.,.. , .;,. ,i,„ ; : .i. 1.,.• 1,:., ,.... , ,,,,, ., •,,,,,,A.,. 1,:. T,, .
..,:. ,,,, ,:1 ,,,,,,, ........„:„.„,,,-• . • .
. . . . . . ,,- ,§. ,,,a; um t),: •,,cr.„ ',,I,[ . g,:„ 1, 0. .,.1..ti ,z• , ,i .,, szt,,, kr:',,,,rseW.;er.• ,A' '
•
,.-
.,..•! 4iit,:- ''
. ;:1' , ./.:'t . ter)) 1- ''. '• "-- (ii, i'• f 7 .1: ''.0, `, ..;I,E:: 1.1'4i'
•.P. i : 1 . '!',,.. ' .0
•
:,N,:;'.i;: ' ;.. '; .i--•,. . SI' f ii• : i 1 ' W* 1....4'11 t" .1:4;ilti„.?fe. i..7-;':;J: jt, •;:". '
'.•-Li. ' ,."44.4 . ;. ‘...a. .1 -ill ,
• .
.,;.. •i• • :•,," - ' . P.:. '.I NEFF'ir 0 oti 1., i •, ....1-, -,ze '1,4 ,i'5;r1,, ::..".r.'5:?•, ..'.4#,'A;
, beo.\\......„, t„ 1 R.•
'— 5 1'„i •i :; ,s,....:i7,;i: •,)t ': ',4' .-4.Y.4.-qc,°..4 °,.' ''
;„; ;i!! , ;,)x,,,, 'ill'•' 1 -ilV. i Tv. 1 41 k •s0 1.1. i,, r?.,..1'-
2...!. ',. T P , 4 i:i:r i:;. . .sill rio -i • . ,•• ...., 0 ,'.44'. 4.."...,',.1,.:e'•j,- %,,
If:'k :,•,!!.. .: ,;=,, .
• • • ; ., ,
• . :., ';orate of Vo`-
l .. .4.11., 1,s
. . ; 4); : /di ,,::11rttli .4' ,fl , ,e,'4 , '!.
,
•••-1.1 A -1,11-1± -,ji !,;• , f*','''L ''''.1 i,.... ,. '.i., f,f,teA di-4K i',..',. ,:
--...,, -
' ` '' .1.21i;. • ',t,1•%i••41:: ,4',15' . !I.i, i 51 ' t ..?:I 3. 1.1... ...f ...TO ', . .,
osc\D_ 3 ,
V\ 74-- 11P
is t `-�
•
_ F
•
PALMER DEPAULIS ��+ ���-_
MAYOR it
OFFICE,OF: THE MAYOR;
324.SOUTH STATE STREET.;
FIFTH FLOOR, SUITE 5OO '
SAL-T:LAKE-CITY-UTAH 84111-
- --535:7704
January 3, 1989
Willie Stoler, Chairperson, and .
Members of the Salt Lake City Council
324 South State Street, Room 300
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Dear Willie:
I am transmitting herewith recommendations for board appointments which I
would appreciate the Council to advise and consent upon:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Paul P. Osborn to be appointed to a term extending through
July, 1990
URBAN FORESTRY BOARD
Paulette Mounteer to be appointed to fill Mary Pat Matheson' s unexpired
term extending through April 8, 1989
I would appreciate your consideration -of these appointments and ask that they
be placed on the Council ' s agenda at the earliest opportunity. If I can
provide you with any further information, please don't hesitate to call .
Sincerely,•
etti,vtAiLZAL
Mayor
PD/EC:jf
1
RESOLUTION NO. OF 1989
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND
SANDY CITY
WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13 of the Utah Code Annotated 1953
as amended allows public entities to enter into cooperative
agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and
WHEREAS; the attached agreement has been prepared to
accomplish said purposes;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake
City, Utah:
1. That it does hereby approve the attached agreement
generally described as follows:
Salt Lake City will provide fire and dispatch services
to Sandy City for a fee stated in the Agreement.
2. Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is
hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt
Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day
' of , 1989.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attomey's Office
?-0 Y- �y
FMN:cc
Date
SAIR i A) 1 GlTlYi 00 P I j
FIRE DEPARTMENT
PETER 0. PEDERSON 315 EAST 200 SOUTH
CHIEF OF FIRE DEPARTMENT SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
799-4101
TO: Salt Lake City Council
DATE: January 19, 1989
RE: Dispatch Agreement between Salt Lake City and
Sandy City. Salt Lake City Fire will
dispatch Sandy City for a pre-
determined monthly fee.
Recommendation: That the City Council agrees to this
cooperation agreement. We are already
dispatching for Sandy City. This is
merely an update on price for such services.
Availability of Funds: None required. Sandy City pays
Salt Lake City for the service of dispatching
fire and emergency calls.
Discussion: The dispatching of other entities for a fee
is a good way for Salt Lake City to build up
a fund. We are dispatching for fire
departments throughout the valley for
negotiated amounts.
Sub ' tted by:
--a —c%:.f-,a'. (/:,7.4,,M.--jo-z---
Peter O. Pederson
Chief of Fire Department
POP/aa
Encls. 4 Original 16 Copies
o Shirley A. Bloxham
+-- Sandy City Recorder
, 440 East 8680 South
5 Sandy, Utah 84070-9990
(801) 566-1561 , ex. 245
AMENDMENT TO
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by and between SALT
LAKE CITY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Sandy City, a municipal
corporation of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as
"Sandy"
•
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, on or about the 27th day of September 1983, the
parties hereto entered into an interlocal agreement for the
provision by Salt Lake City of fire and rescue dispatch services
to Sandy City: and Sandy.
WHEREAS, paragraph 5 of said agreement provides that the
monthly fee for said service shall be renegotiated annually by
written amendment tb said agreement, which renegotiation has been
effected:
NOW, THEREFORE, for consideration deemed just and adequate
by the parties, said original agreement is amended as follows:
1. Paragraph 5 of said original agreement shall read as
follows:
Sandy City agrees to pay a fee of $ 3, 445. 26 per
month as a basic dispatch fee to Salt lake City during
the fiscal year 1988. Said fee shall be renegotiated
anually by a written amendment of the parties during the -
term of this Agreement.
PROPERTY OF SANDS' CilY RECORDERS OFHCE
-1-
2. All other terms and conditions of the original agreement
between the parties relating to fire and rescue dispatch
services not otherwise amended by this or prior
amendments shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have subscribed this
amendment this day of _ , 1988.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
ATTEST: ' BY
PALMER A. DePAULIS, Mayor
KATHERYN MARSHALL
City Recorder
SANDY CITY CORPORATION
BY SSA/N Y CITY
- 1
ATTEST:
SANDY CI' RE D R
=40161.4.
_ O
illle? I 2.1)
NO • At
'SF11
PROPERTY OF CITY RECORDERS OFFICE
SALT LAKE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Dispatch Contract Fees For F.Y. 1987/88
Provided To: SANDY CITY
Date Prepared: 1/15/87
Total:
ASSESSED 231,137,671 X $137,418 = $9,777
VALUE FACTOR:
(a)3,248,591,406
(20K of Total Budget)
POPULATION 63,498 X $137,418 = 013,696
VALUE FACTOR:
(a) 637,118
(20x of Total Budget)
USAGE (b) 2,220 X S412,254 = S23,718
VALUE FACTOR:
(a) 38,587
(60% of Total Budget)
Contract Coats: S47,191
Ad in1.rGti v e Feed: $4,719
Total Yearly Fee: 551,910
Total Monthly Fee: 54,325.83
ADJUSTED YEARLY FEE: 039,753
ADJUSTED MONTHLY FEE: $3,312.75
Summary of Costs In Calculating Dispatch Formula:
87188 Recommended Fiscal Budget Budget Percent Total:
Dispatch Office(60-00600) 0671,776 100x $671,776
Communication Shop(12-00025) $306,267 5x 015,313
Total Budget: S687,089
FOOTNOTES:
(a) Base figures ad]usted to reflect 9 cities.
Source: Statistical Review of Government in Utah, published
by the Utah Foundation (1986 Edition).
(b) Usage information provided by CAD ayste■ of Salt Lake City
Fire Department.
SALT LAKE CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Diapatch Contract Fees For F.Y. 1988/89
Provided To: SANDY CITY
Date Prepared: 2/3/88
Date Raviaed: 3/1/88 Total:
MARKET 1,258,773,939 X S149,540 = 011,165
VALUE FACTOR:
(a)16,859,806,077
(20x of Total Budget)
POPULATION 52,210 X $149,540 = $12,555
VALUE FACTOR:
(a) 621,880
(20X of Total Budget)
USAGE (b) 2,486 X $448,621 $29,041
VALUE FACTOR:
(a) 38,403
(60x of Total Budget)
Interlocal Dispatch Contract: S52,761
Administrative Fees: $5,276
Total Annual Fee Based On Formula: S58,037
Total Monthly Fee Based On Formula: $4,836.41
z=za=zmezx==ms
USE THE CALCULATION OF COSTS AS LISTED BELOW:
Annual Yearly Fee Based On Adjustments: (c) 041,343
Monthly Fee Based On Adjuatsente: 03,445.26
zaz
Suuuary of Costs In Calculating Dispatch Formula:
88/89 Recoasended Fiscal Budget Budget Percent Total:
Dispatch Office(60-00600) 0733,448 100x 0733,448
Coaaunication Shop(12-00025) 0285,083 5% 014,254
Total Budget: 0747,702
FOOTNOTES:
(a) Base figures adjusted to reflect 9 cities.
Source: Statistical Review of Government in Utah, published
by the Utah Foundation (1987 Edition).
(b) Usage information provided by CAD system of Salt Lake City
Fire Department.
(c) Fee edjsutaents are based upon historical information
of past trends in G.H.P. performance.
..T ,-....,C3'.ws35c-•'.wu^'_ _ - m...4- ...;.............1..........,..............,,.........-:-s:.-_.-, -.,.:,,..,. • a.._.... _
f ., -
'.. ,s_.•117.1., •-• /
• 1..y y- /VAIN (� r l`J . ` j v / .•l
•
•
aye.. ,
•
A.
1-.•-, , , INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT i• •
•
; i (For Exchange of Fire Protection
'� ' . and Rescue Services)
y . }
x T.9IS'AGRFL•1ENT, dated this ?7••tr` day of 4il.. _ , 1983,
r, , , r
' Y> ▪ ... by a-rd, between SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corpora- •
, .• 1: Y {-u; , tion of tyre State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as "City" an •
d
.,'''▪ a-,; SANDY CITY,`a municipal corporation of the State of Utah, herein-
1 r� S
h" ,,, , after referred to as "Sandy",
t •
,�•u' .' ih.. , k, .. ram - . ,
(s-1 X*.' :=� K� s t W I•'r N' E S S E T H: .
le j V '� • , ` -
` ar • s, WI1E'tEAS, the parties hereto each have the authority .
k_', `^ ,'� ," ` conferred by law to provide fire protection services and to enter
`- tit
'. A �y1 into mutual aid:contracts with respect thereto; and - ; a ;-,
,, �Sa , ,.�. 4 • -
fit ),,, ,r- 1 WHEREAS, the parties desireV to enter into an- n�reenent-'"""--^ ' 1_,,
a
�-r -fit . ,, whereby the City will'Provide, Sandy with fire dispatch services
A-,Yrif -• ---A.-, 'including both fire and etaergency medical; and • - 1 1
,rtr
^ ei :r 1-THEPEAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code ,Annotated, 1953, ic, :. >
.� „4-;, _
I
r •,,� � a
' aended, authorizes contracts between public agencies for the
A'as••.x ' performance' of governmental services which each public a;^ncy .
•
' i--, .. authorized by law to perform.
� ; 3 -SOW, THER,EFOPE,: in consideration ci the rr.c.u, 1 r.rc i s ,
t,: q1`I
ter^s and conditions set forth herein, the p-arties c:�ree .is
. +• , follows
r s*, 1. Commencing July 1 , 1932, the a:.it L ) •
-
:
y, • De,�art,.ent_shall dispatch all fire and medical al::r:-s
r
M 1'
ftL11<; •e )r- .• uir g ', �j,'� t 'j"�{ j' .y I f t4`•', t -. ) r,d•_
i ph, t c „o- r i"' x - r, f�.; �",' 4j �� t� p
� 4 j s � S` i yw 1� 4 " ,,q( i�i d" Si' .p, r, y , 1�fin:7 }�_. J b r c
/ ;.• -41i " ,.. <3 •••r .: toµ .,� , -1. 7n� £
•
• Q�
1•1 tea ' • 2 • - a , .Yl;,-,,•trx-1.�F.FiY • ,-•s'✓s
�_3 niG }l: YS 4c ) '�..T Y�`•J'ti 4.' l i ..l..f 1'M (( /A' 5�� '�.
Y i'i.., ' K.,-., .lb'[�^-N.,- �r(}VrJ Alp-,
• .-Vag j, ' 'F' �$' ' •" �p�t• .' .' r t 'e� �• '. ..f7-? S '
3 .... -SIY��Na 1.''- F-1 j, t AyTi'i.pJi-�y - v.,fil.}b .,t� l�h �t,' ---a.C' %y •{'m t �x ,,. 1:
' ] Vt,: k+ �" �3Yr n-. �.o„ '7Rf ,� ace . ,,. %'.`'7 441,,1.lt r�a '[.? �h�,✓�Lin t< �'2�-' ••r s♦u 1 .x �"+ �' �� .3f�' 2,1F;' S�E',.."l-x,,,.• _e ,„: .- 2 ''.era' Zh .`Ti 4. �y° 5,;,�•l+ 1 .w,A,54.4 riJ„. ',,c,tr°' 4 ti^y ,1, S yf ,• ....r.44. � 1
��': �.:,K`"i Z"�• r et f w 1 r'�a�GA,� � 'z'a ? .. � c .�r w
--e -- +-, r,:k�1 . !;�`Y.r ^,I, ,,.. r,- .a. ra?-Yy�5 r� ''g.'e t -y, .G w c -t r• T • `
x,., r�1� 1 Z- C �. k�,PY'f�.s 2' `.- � yvr 7A.p s4 r`�,' '�y'�4yli �.'�� z�' F < S' S 1-. W,, k ,i _
y b T ` , k +, P'e rc3` vy''T ,�',': --'-r d .:S v8• � „'i. {:-
.�1:'S ,a.t>y...,�.k.,-�• ,,.,,1r_sr as iy y:-� �r.2�5a- � w�•y� �,I 9'� , 7 �•.rr .t� �,,'� �f.r ? .,-:�'r i I
c.': R1. 1.•„.4Tiie•toi!. s,m"F' a. sse.> `Ka fti•••-,-e r r 4 �s ri- . ttw~ a i� t .n .y �• pi,,, C y \ _
1 'Z MG '�.`'.a�..,,1'+,, ,� y.e'^ tL�`.�`' •a lr Yy' � � i L`�_ .
. .y 3 E "'s-? t. 3+-' '>l r ;'- so'A' c a is'- -- -r_t�i :, ` ,4..7 4.r uY7�' ,�!`:.,'••,.<y,. '- ry,t 41--- it 't' -' !�,
t,`T"v tt-.^.F y .- c r'1 { a,� -:—.• . v�,�-r� _ ,i;u1. tr i _,' 2 e. ,( . ..` .x," ot,..,+,, --;'.t F,,tf�` . " +,ri.',,- s,-
F 4r`k ♦.0 1.4:d .,. fi `P•r ?:,"Ye ` • 7'�c. t'1'14A. .,aE }, \��`,.t7-r. •,c.. S�a ''✓'sc YrFt.[ r Z:::: '," Yr .N Y ,.
.Y pi.ait i t1 w r , 't '''. -cr°C `tit=a '-•le y} . ��r 3"r'y ib`. 'g Y tn,*ie.,. ti r I' ,ti
±"• 1- ..,r". S4a' y �v.. j he :... Y✓ j F.-Y 'Yvi A x f %ti Y _ ` r ,q' 1
a • '"�t ... �
^x "- 'h 'Yar :� ,' e r .'F,• "'x. <7.' R,P. .: i r a.7.4 -" ` ,f,:Q S.' 1°q, r -r':C 3i `.. x ''r `.., - IJ
:T, ,_ t .401T -g,.. .?� e # 4 N,-;< -Y'f'' -.,�C 4:."171 r{ ^,'�.r .y'''Y';�,'t'- t.13 t1 INi . }."r. 7,' 1' `StD.ik '7a/t1,r�9� G_�, 1#'.;• '.�.