01/11/2011 - Work Session - Minutes PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011
The City Council met in Work Session on Tuesday, January 11, 2011, at
5 : 00 p.m. in Room 326, Committee Room, City County Building, 451 South
State Street .
In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Van Turner, Jill
Remington Love, JT Martin, Stan Penfold, Luke Garrott and Soren
Simonsen.
Also In Attendance: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director;
Mayor Ralph Becker; Edwin Rutan, City Attorney; Chris Burbank, Police
Chief; Lehua Weaver, Council Policy Analyst/Constituent Liaison; Rick
Graham, Public Services Director; D.J. Baxter, Redevelopment Agency
Executive Director; Helen Langan, Mayor' s Senior Advisor; Frank Gray,
Community and Economic Development Director; Wilford Sommerkorn,
Planning Director; Tim Harspt, Transportation Director; Mary De La
Mare-Schaefer, Deputy Director of Community and Economic Development;
David Everitt, Mayor' s Chief of Staff; David Hart, FAIA, Vice
President/Regional Manager of MOCA Systems; Kevin Miller, GSBS
Architects; Tim Doubt, Deputy Police Chief, Facilities Division; Brian
Dale, Deputy Fire Chief; Lisa Pascadlo, Police Accident Investigator;
and Scott Crandall, Deputy City Recorder.
Councilmember Love presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 5 : 17 p.m.
AGENDA ITEMS
#1. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING A REVIEW OF
COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
No discussion or announcements .
#2 . 5:16:51 PM RECEIVE AN UPDATE FROM DAVID HART, FAIA, VICE
PRESIDENT/REGIONAL MANAGER OF MOCA SYSTEMS, REGARDING PLANS FOR THE
CITY'S NEW PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES. View Attachments
David Hart, Helen Langan, Kevin Miller, Tim Doubt, Brian Dale,
and Frank Gray briefed the Council with a PowerPoint presentation and
the attached handouts. Council Members expressed concerns about
adequate shade and weather related safety issues concerning the
canopy. Mr. Hart said they would continue to address those issues as
the project progressed.
11 - 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011
Councilmember Love said unless there were objections, a request
authorizing release of funds would be placed on the next agenda. A
majority of the Council was in favor.
#3 . 6:14:06PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING
A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF SALT LAKE CITY ("RDA") , MARMALADE H&J, LLC, AND MARMALADE K, LLC
PURSUANT TO A CONDITION OF ORDINANCE 55 OF 2006. THIS ACTION RELATES
TO AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTIES ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF 300
WEST BETWEEN 500 AND 600 NORTH AND CHANGING THE CAPITOL HILL MASTER
PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP TO ALLOW HIGH DENSITY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS.
View Attachments
D.J. Baxter and Wilford Sommerkorn briefed the Council with the
attached handouts . Councilmember Love said the item would be
scheduled for consideration on January 18, 2011 .
#4 . 7:21:50 PM HOLD A POLICY DISCUSSION WITH THE ADMINISTRATION
REGARDING PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. View Attachments
Tim Harpst, David Everitt, Chris Burbank and Lisa Pascadlo
briefed the Council with the attached handouts . Council Members made
a number of suggestions including pedestrian prioritization, more
public transit shelters, exploring east/west routes along 2100 South,
800 South or other locations, enhanced public education programs,
eliminate right turn pockets at certain intersections such as 21st and
21st, develop complete streets policy, engage extended public groups,
identify impediments to implementation, fund ongoing education
programs, dedicated media team with sufficient resources, promote
education through schools, use Main Street/South Temple as a trial
pedestrian test/auto restricted zone and pursue grant funding.
#5. 8:12:39 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING THE MAYOR' S NORTHWEST
QUADRANT MASTER PLAN EVALUATION AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
PROPOSAL. View Attachments
David Everitt, Mary De La Mare-Schaefer and Wilford Sommerkorn
briefed the Council with the attached handouts . Council Members
expressed concerns/questions about a number of issues including
investigating preservation options, allowing the public to see the
area first hand and draw own conclusions, engage property owners
including property rights, investment required to develop a plan,
select panel of experts to evaluate plan, sustainable long-range
planning strategies and development patterns, lack of long-range
natural resources to accomplish plan goals, educate people on entire
11 - 2
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011
scope/range of available land, acquisition of private property and
costs associated with different options .
Discussion was held on receiving follow-up information/updates
from the Administration. One option was to have a quarterly briefing
in addition to informal communications . Councilmember Love said the
Council would develop a schedule for updates .
Councilmember Love asked if any Council Members objected to
moving forward with releasing previously allocated funds . A majority
of the Council was in favor. Councilmember Love said she would work
with staff on the logistics .
#6. (TENTATIVE) RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING THE UPCOMING
REDISTRICTING PROCESS WHICH WILL ESTABLISH BOUNDARIES FOR THE SALT
LAKE CITY COUNCIL AND SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL BOARD DISTRICTS BASED ON
THE 2010 CENSUS. View Attachments
Item removed from agenda.
#7 . 8:35:35 PM COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO HAVE ATTENDED OUT-OF-TOWN
CONFERENCES OR SITE VISITS WILL PROVIDE BRIEF REPORTS ON THEIR
OBSERVATIONS.
Council Members Turner and Penfold briefed the Council on their
trip to Portland, Oregon.
#8. 6:07:23PM INTERVIEW EMILIE CHARLES PRIOR TO HER APPOINTMENT TO
THE LIBRARY BOARD. (ITEM H1)
Councilmember Love said Ms . Charles' s name was on the Consent
Agenda for consideration during the formal meeting.
#9 . 6:19:57PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A JOINT RESOLUTION WITH
MAYOR BECKER IN SUPPORT OF THE LIBRARY BOARD AND LIBRARY MANAGEMENT.
Council Members discussed issues relating to the proposal . A
majority of the Council was in favor of a resolution expressing the
Council' s confidence in the Library Board, director and strategic
plan.
#10. 8:50:33 PM CONSIDER A MOTION TO ENTER INTO CLOSED SESSION, IN
KEEPING WITH UTAH CODE § 52-4-204, FOR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PURPOSES:
a) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PURSUANT
TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (b) ;
11 - 3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
WORK SESSION
TUESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2011
b) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE PURCHASE, EXCHANGE OR LEASE
OF REAL PROPERTY (INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER RIGHT OR WATER SHARES)
WHEN PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL
OR ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE
CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION ON THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS
PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (d) ;
c) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING OR REASONABLY IMMINENT
LITIGATION PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE § 52-4-205 (1) (c) ;
d) A STRATEGY SESSION TO DISCUSS THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY
(INCLUDING ANY FORM OF WATER RIGHT OR WATER SHARES) IF (1) PUBLIC
DISCUSSION OF THE TRANSACTION WOULD DISCLOSE THE APPRAISAL OR
ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION OR PREVENT THE
CITY FROM COMPLETING THE TRANSACTION ON THE BEST POSSIBLE TERMS, (2)
THE CITY PREVIOUSLY GAVE NOTICE THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE OFFERED FOR
SALE, AND (3) THE TERMS OF THE SALE ARE PUBLICLY DISCLOSED BEFORE THE
CITY APPROVES THE SALE; AND
e) FOR ATTORNEY-CLIENT MATTERS THAT ARE PRIVILEGED PURSUANT TO
UTAH CODE § 78B-1-137 .
Councilmember Garrott moved and Councilmember Penfold seconded to
enter into Closed Session. A roll call vote was taken. Council
Members Christensen, Turner, Penfold, Love, Garrott, Martin and
Simonsen voted aye. See file M 11-2 for Sworn Statement and
recording.
The meeting adjourned at 9 : 20 p.m.
UialLiet
r ti, »an '( 1t
COUNCIL CHAIR '.f,:
CI°
♦ \�Ml tS�h �?r�t
l'Air 2 e
Y RE E
This document along with the digital recording constitute the
official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held January
11, 2011 .
sc
11 - 4
4f= ; ;; ;t RECEIVED
j
RALPH B MAYOR
� 1 witil nt.� l JCA N 0 5 2011
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LC COUNCIL OFFICE
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received: b i C=I Z.cl I I
David yen , Chief ff Date sent to Council: (II / .l
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: January 4, 2011
JT Martin, Chair
FROM: Helen Langan, Senior Advisor to the Mayor
David Hart, Public Safety Building Project Manager
SUBJECT: Public Safety Building Update
STAFF CONTACT: Helen Langan, x6244
DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing
RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends that the City Council create a budget for the
remaining $100 million associated with the sale of Public Safety Building General Obligation
Bonds to allow the PSB project to continue to move forward and remain on schedule.
BUDGET IMPACT: $100 million of Public Safety Bond Proceeds, as recommended in
Budget Amendment#2.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Introduction
The Public Safety Building project has been underway since Salt Lake City voters
overwhelmingly passed a general obligation bond for$125 million in November 2009. The City
Council has been receiving regular briefings from project manager David Hart of Moca Systems
and Council staff has been participating on the City's PSB Steering Committee, alongside many
other City department representatives.
At its November 16, 2010 meeting,the City Council held open item#A-4 of Budget
Amendment#2 requesting the creation of a budget of$100 million for the Public Safety
Building project, and asked for further information and discussion of design and budget issues.
Since that time, small group briefings were held throughout the month of December with
451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 306
P.O.BOX 145474,SALT LAKE CITY,UTAH 84114-5474
TELEPHONE:801-535-7704 FAX:801-535-6331
www.slcgov.com
m
Council members to provide a more in depth discussion of the project and the pending issues.
This memo summarizes the status of several of the most important aspects of the project in order
to give the City Council the information needed as they consider creating a budget for the
remaining $100 million of bond proceeds to allow the project to remain on schedule.
Building Design
Design work on the new Public Safety Building has been completed through the Criteria
Design Phase (detailed descriptions of the criteria design and current images of the design can be
found in Attachments 3 and 4). As explained by our architectural team, the architectural design
process is divided into phases that sequentially add detail, add refinement, and evolve the design.
The Criteria Design phase is very early in the process when the goals are to establish the
functional organization of the project, determine the footprint of the building structure, and to
establish the architectural aesthetic and language. These goals are achieved using initial site
plans, floor plans, elevations and models (either physical or computer generated)that illustrate
the basic design concepts at a level of detail that is appropriate for this early phase of the work.
A detailed discussion of the Criteria Design can be found in the end-of-phase deliverable that has
been submitted to the City. Acceptance of the Criteria Design submittal launches the design team
into Detailed Design phase of the work. As the name implies, in this phase, the design team
develops detailed solutions for building systems that are implied in the Criteria Design phase.
The purpose of the detailed design phase is to allow the owner and the design team to analyze
and make decisions on manageable portions of the project in a way that build, one decision upon
another, to a rational, credible and evidence based solution.
Incorporation of City Council and Public Feedback on Design
With the forgoing in mind, it is important to acknowledge that the design team expects there
will be evolution and refinement of the design as work progresses through the remainder of the
design process. The impetus for that evolution will generate from, among other sources, input
from the steering committee, the public comment website and meetings with the specific public
groups, and the comments of the City Council. A few of the items included on this list are:
• Extent and character of the Green Roof areas: Green roofs have been included in the
design to improve the quality of space in program space areas that overlook roofs and to
2
mitigate storm drainage impact from roof run-off. Planting material and access to the roof
areas continues to be studied.
• The "woonerf:" The amount of vehicular vs. pedestrian traffic that is encouraged on this
feature; how much, if any, parking is provided along its course; the means by which a barrier
is provided between the woonerf and the plaza are being considered.
• 500 South: The design team is evaluating a number of opportunities to enhance the
characterization of this street as a Grand Boulevard. Items of study include the scale and
texture of the south elevation with an eye toward improving the human scale identification of
this and the other building elevations. We are also studying the quality of the pedestrian
experience with the expectation that it be equal to the one that will be created on the north
side of the project at 450 South. Lastly, strong consideration is being given to the
opportunities that can be created for public art in this space.
• 450 South: The design team is considering the possible future of the new 450 South and the
ways in which the work that is completed as a part of the Public Safety Building will
contribute to and reinforce the quality of that new street as it develops to the east of the
project.
• The\east half of Library Square: While the project budget and scope are limited to the
boundaries of the PSB site, the design team continues to think about the future development
and usage possibilities for the eastern portion of Library Square. Our goal is to create
opportunities for that parcel by virtue of the work that will be done on the PSB site, and to
encourage a spatial dialogue between the two blocks.
• Blair Street: The extension of Blair Street through the block to 500 South addresses both
programmatic and functional requirements of the PSB as well as achieving a planning goal of
the city. By doing so, however, the potential for a un-walkable service alley has also been
created. The design team is studying a number of elements to ensure the character and
quality of experience of Blair Street is appropriate.
• Mid Block Axis Extension: The axis from the City and County building that runs east past
the library has been extended to the public safety site. It has been discussed by the steering
committee and the administration that the extension of this axial walk way east is an
important element of the design. The design team is looking at opportunities to accomplish
this goal.
3
• Transit Oriented Development Consideration: The design has provided for a significant
amount of Transit Oriented Development(TOD) opportunity. While the TOD is not part of
the PSB project, consideration of how this development may occur has been considered and
provided for. Parking as well as access to the site has been identified and provided within the
current design.
Net Zero Goal
Mayor Becker has challenged the Public Safety Building team to attempt to design a
building that achieves the goal of being net zero, meaning the building generates as much energy
as it uses. As a result of this goal, sustainability has been a big driver for the building and the
architectural team has been working hard on a design that passively and actively conserves
energy use and has the ability to generate more energy, in order to put the net zero goal within
reach. A detailed summary of the net zero approach being taken by this project can be found in
Attachment 2.
One key element of the approach to net zero is the plan to heavily utilize solar energy
through the use of photovoltaic panels, on and around the building and perhaps also at an offsite
location, After extensive research,the project team believes that one of the best options the City
has at its disposal to purchase and maintain the needed solar panels is to enter into a Power
Purchase Agreement in which an outside investor funds a significant portion of the cost of the
panels in exchange for the tax credits, this is a funding method Salt Lake County has used and
had great success with. In order to successfully utilize a PPA, the project manager is
recommending $2 million of the PSB budget(Attachment 1) be set aside to use toward a Power
Purchase Agreement(PPA). The PPA would help ensure that no additional general fund budget
money is needed for this project.
Budget
The PSB project is currently projected to be on budget(Attachment 1) and the project
team is clear on the City's expectation that the PSB project be funded by the $125 million bond
in a way that does not create additional demand for General Fund dollars. The attached budget
and footnotes section illustrates how the project team plans to accomplish that objective and
provides a detailed overview of the current status of the budget.
4
PSB Schedule Key Dates
• Criteria Design—August 23 to October 4, 2010
— Public comments November 10, 2010—December 9, 2010
• Detailed Design—November 25, 2010 to February 2, 2011
— Presentation of Final Design—February 22, 2011
• Construction Bid Packages
— Demolition begins—February 1, 2011
- Excavation begins—May 3, 2011
— Foundation and Parking begins—July 18, 2011
— Base Building begins—November 4, 2011
• Completion Scheduled for March 31, 2013
Conclusion
The design of the Public Safety Building project has been driven by the goals of balance
and function. The City must have a highly functional building for the public safety goals of the
building to ensure the police, fire and emergency management departments can do everything
they need to do to protect the public during a catastrophic event like an earthquake. In addition,
the building must provide for the public space needs that the City promised to voters during bond
election including a public space that is welcoming and a space which includes a police and fire
museum, public meeting and event space, a well designed public plaza, etc. Finally these goals
must also allow the City to achieve the energy goals set by the Mayor that will allow the City to
show leadership on sustainability and set a direction for the future.
The project team is confident that a healthy balance of all the competing demands of the
building has been struck, and the result will be an outstanding building that the City can be proud
of.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Budget Spreadsheet
2. Net Zero Energy Definition and Approach Memo
3. Criteria Design Submittal
4. Images of PSB Site and Initial Building Design
5. Letter from Salt Lake City Police and Fire Department Endorsing Building Design
5
1/4/2011
Previous Category Jul-09 Nov-2010 Doc-10 Budget
Original Previous Currc nt Variance
Project Management 3,04,600 3,227.6 a 7 -
MCCAA .6e0717° "' �Ti .
.r
Net Zero ' ,. " h
ro • -
Ardultectural Fees 5,671,200 6,624,154 � ' l ,, -
6
Non linear Strtglu0l Aplyas 320 Arcbcteral RwnbuAshle 3e400 313.23� 113 i J; -
li%2LA T3
Spedalty Cawrtents 1.312,000 1.162,440 15OM0 (12.000)
.
Maridiertbtrnetjrtrl{ - �- "•;
EMC • NUM M'= .. - ... -
TraMlsMnpsetibpfir - 7.11w �M . .
MI-Abesetnent 14,4ie ' 1 Ne :. -
ExAlblt Covariant 00,000 lases , ' (12.000)
NV ost 200,000 200A00 - ° -
Structural peer nvlew - 73,000 73,000 -
M 261.1e1 111111111111= -
Construction 67,952.556 66,358,679 65,566,000 (792,679)
Demolition 500,000 '9000 (y0,100)
ment 071.000 1.e13,6e0 - (100,000C
ConcrettifCMU/Wick Veneer
r 302 so0 500.000 (MAN
tatwi/eridr venaw
Structural Steel 11,O0r000 11.263,600 (137,000)
HVAAJMedtanlae(/8eer Opening/harass 14,0002210 12.031.2410 (1i7.00q
Electrical 7,1100,000 1,701,000 (100,0001
Elevator,Curtain weil/iletbrg,Melwout, pnnispension 11,770,179 11.61 ,000 (134,179)
system,Metal Penult,Precast Concrete,Canopy,etc.
Water Female 215,000 21ft000 -
General Contractors Fee 2,941,000 3,942,000 -
General Contractors General Conditions 2,300,000 2,300,000 -
General Contractms Cantingenly 5,670,340 5,370,501 5,311,050 (59,4511
Page 1
1/4/2011
.0km.
Owner Cats • 11.610,610" 15.07,110 21.149.514.'t 1.432.134
Furniture,Factures and Equipment 1,5411,100 3,500,000 3,500,000 -
FF&E . 3,000,1100 t 5.800.000,
..
Lab folWAPinent . $004100, : atiaer. '' .' -
Wilk Cases 100•010
Tedtonelgy Padcar 3,200,000 11,113,800 11 7W) i •, ,,
1 41....4 .13!iryit,_,,,,- - -, - s -- ' ' - ,-7---:'----2';! iik,:;;„, ,- -.;. ,.-' i'r;ii„..';‘.,Z •; I, ,•''''i''''I. ,'. -
,:',"17 ki • it..,,- :'... .-..1.4..i,,',tt4.74,,,,.."4.-44.5':2:4,4.1 ...;.,t`,,• ,4A,V-,...,-,,j,i ,_,`,,';%.,0,, ,,,,,,,i, ;,,tp,,, !.:1^`.P:t.4,-.; • ''• ' ..ii•:.•;.,,,t'..•-j..4`.0" ....4-•.` ..,:-:-,z....,....-ye,:::',:r '.;
."--'",-;1' '1-77—' 4- •Itlicalinat Said lanai*Signaja,`,.,:--, ,'--'''--'4.,,,l';,‘C.,,, '-i;;;i4: .,.,:,',.'", '' '.r• • ki,4'ttA4, C":. .- ,^''',. • ''
,
ittP.OddeFL --'--, -- --- --- , -.., -, ' , - -- - ,- -4,4_, ,.:'-- -- - - , • ' .' •
4,, coot,,Ams,..-.. ii.:-,..„-: . .: . .,, __ ,,,,,.,„i,-,1, ';‘, ,t,..-.,., ,--,,,,,7.:..:,), --,,,,-- :-. :;;10,00 0' ‘'..f.,4',,,2..,.. ..:•;,....; ,,,.1 :i.".i=r7,72:71:,,,
, • , " ';\ :' 9Ipeitocits,-:".-',, -„%.,- '„,-,,t,'-'-..„"F,.':--,',.=, 1"-,..:'-,, ::,.,..11,,,,-::. .4 q,,4; -1,.- ....•'' .i.4.?'i" ii,"-.;''',:,,,,l`k.,,,,,,4 .•.`:',, : 1:•,:j.•LiWirt••
mtii.
...,,istarsi#1 -poi,./aithec.-,',,,',_:,:1,,,, •.--,,,'J7-..i:-.-:••7 -. „,, ':-,-,-,':.---,.,-,,,'„4-4;s0;-;, ,v,'-',-- i•-••' '-a-.7,.:;'4. ;., F•=44,4,:ipol- , • .1 :::;-:7,47;, ,.,
44.:
. 0„Aokisc.5 vie*!:-.,,!;:.;.1, ',.,-,, . ,,„ =.,'_,', 1":' e; .,. :-. -.', ,.-44i •:"4. '..4i-t: - ': .-:'if-t:'-.1 '''')-.,,'''''''' 1'''''7.4
Onfrie -.-- "--'r--',..Fe'::=7:-.".:-..,i.• ' " .".:-•: ',.`?,:t:.:,,,'..; r.,, ,.'-....?'''',:,:7;i.,,-4:4';,;:44.4- i':,,:'A,',..... -;;.`I-42,'ifr ,..p.,.f44.....-A,;• , ••
.:.:. .- ',', ,,,,,,.'.... i:,,-_,.. 4,,,--,-•• .r,',.:.„:.,.z•N• f-, -•,-.-i- ,--. :.:,,,,;iii:',‘,1-,,, ,,kr••,:t15.i;T• 1. 1:7, • '
•Tideslivatilmi - --''' — -- ' -,-1404003, ;, ``.,-- , -UW0. 11:%:,;, ::•:-•-• ,,,,t;i:':;:ei•
Land Acquisition Cats 11,200,000 6,649.1163 %SUSS
-'‘- '9/14011:.- f;f,":;,;Y,,' .: , ,. , , , ' r." m., ' 4 147*.,,•,,q-.,
:, • '`- • • - , ..i„ --
''''.:`''' giF.4-4-,- ,:,•'
. C
'.' Matillill,riP•!- ,'',."='1. `.,!:;',.. -: . '-,, -. ' ' '- , - , , ;'-'1:2.,',.''..,.,:7'1: r '.' i.iiS14 :,''',:.;', •-t''
MAI''' 41t,::,-."-'-! ' ' ---.--.--- - - . ,'. - r• .. Lipka* '',-: '.;', ,-,'000,400
150/100.
,141106iFilltli..) ,-,--- • , , - • , 14434004) ',;:"' 'n:10.114104)
Permits,Fee Plan Check,etc. 1,134,400 2,194,400 3,554,000 1,419,600
— Building Permit - - 2.134,400 6111.000 ' - (1.70A.003)
Additions'%MINS 300.1101' • ' '100,000
land Copt, -. - , - - - 1.004100
lend Interior .., MOXY4 :
**Mt Feel;10 lie paid ' 1.1100.1610 ;,'- ' ::1#000.000
limpact ke Mitirdif -_ - . , ' ,-• 'i'LlitileD) 5.-;-' '"IVACO)
Utilities - 710,000 720,000 -
MAP-lientepi"II relosate - •; SOAPS .• 96400 i "''"
IMP-temporary during imratruction - 30400* - $460.000 '1"- " -
IMP..New servers - MAO " 910.900 , -
Comet - $0,000, 1.. 60,100 -
illuester - 90,000 . 50.00IP ' " -
Spaded Testing and Inspection 1,110,400 1,235,600 , 930,000 (305,600)
Testing&ingiocdon - 400.1100 , knot. - *too*
Abaawnent - 114600 MIMIC, , ISA%
LUD NC CertillsatiOn - 30.001/.. ' 20.000 -
Construedon glen repperkietion - aoi000 *ebb' -
Public Art 756,000 771,922 769,311 (2,606)
Moving and Relocation 541,600 541,600 541,600 -
Owildr4611144346104114904'Ar • . tr--' ' , - . 10,61000.. t-'::;Z ' 141191rtili:V41.04#
Construction Unallocated Contingency 7,719,2111 7,612,505 (106,713)
Design Unallocated Contingency 3,067,626 2,795,000 (272,626)
Solar PV Panel 1,1100,000
•
Tedmelegy
Addldend Desigt - 295,000
Total Project Costs 125,004,000 124760.621 124,167,474 2,81,163
Page 2
MOCAIM SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
SYSTEMSRESOLUTION MEMORANDUM
Date: December 8,2010
To: Steering Committee
From: David Hart
CC: PSB Team
Re: Net Zero Energy Goals
Net Zero Energy is a goal of the new Public Safety Building. In order to
achieve this goal the steering committee has resolved that the definition
the project will use to speak about Net Zero and to calculate Net Zero
will be based on Net Zero Energy Emissions,similar to the one
developed by National Research Energy Laboratory (NREL). It can also
be referred to as a Zero Carbon Building or a Zero Emission Building.
The methodology to calculate Net Zero Energy Emission will be
consistent with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol developed by the World
Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable
Development.The calculation will only consider carbon emissions from
energy use of the proposed building,not carbon emission from employee
transportation or construction of the building.The goal will be to balance
the carbon emission from energy use of the proposed building with
avoided carbon emission from renewable energy and off-site renewable
energy credits to achieve a zero carbon footprint or a net zero carbon
building which is consistent with the Mayors goal of net zero energy.The
calculation will use the following rates:
Emissions Rates
Lncrg 1'\pc Isg CO2C/\lhiu
Natural Gas 53.2
District Steam 78.95
District Hot Water 78.95
Electricity 120.6066
District Chilled Water(Electric 28.71582843
Driven Chiller)
MOCA Systems Page 1
Avoided Emissions Rates
I:ncr � "I'vpc Icy CO2c/11hiu
Solar Photovoltaic Array used by 0
the building
On-site Solar Photovoltaic Array 178.1966
supplied to the power grid
Renewable Energy Credits (REC) 178.1966
The project must prioritize the types of renewable energy that will be
used to create a Net Zero Energy Emission project. Prioritization for this
project is as follows:
a. Step 1 —Use PV within the footprint of the building.
b. Step 2—Use PV available at the site.
c. Step 3—Use PV available off site to generate and replace energy
used on site.
d. Step 4—Purchase off site renewable energy credits as needed.
Creating a Net Zero Energy Emission project involves a process of
deliberate steps including
1. The architects,working with the users (Police,Fire and EOC),are to
design an Ultra Low Energy building that is net zero ready(ready to
receive PV).All functions and required needs are to be included in
the design which will result in an overall energy approach.The cost
of the PV will not be included in the projects construction cost.
However,the architects will identify the minimum amount of PV that
will be needed to run the essential services (emergency operations
during an event),as well as the additional amount of PV that will be
need to run the full building on a daily basis.
►.�.�wro. a•,a�.. The starting point for the design work which the design and
construction team will use is as follows:
• Lighting System—24%
• Equipment Plug Load Systems—8%
• HVAC Systems—33%
• Domestic Hot Water System- <1%
• Exterior Lighting Systems- 1%
• Data Center Electrical and MEP Systems— 18%
"'' ....._.�,, • Parking Structure Lighting—15%
cO.a„N,wwt.WM
„r.....�H • Elevator Systems—1%
MOCA Systems Page 2
The Architect will develop an organizational system for consistently
tracking and monitoring the interdependencies and interactive nature
of each of these systems.A description of design responsibilities and
user responsibilities will need to be developed and presented for
discussion.The organizational systems should show how decisions
made by the design team and the steering committee are impacting
the goals and objectives of the project as well as the impact on other
systems.The goal of the system will be to keep the overall project in
balance.
2. The City will pursue and develop a Power Purchase Agreement
(PPA) similar to that of Salt Lake County,with the exception that the
city will hold onto and assign the Renewable Energy Credits (REC's)
to the PSB. The City may decide to pursue a larger PPA than what is
required for the PSB.Therefore, funding for the PPA provided by
the project will be equivalent to the cost of providing the minimum
amount of renewable energy(PV) that will be needed for the essential
services during an event the project will contribute these costs to the
PPA which are currently estimated to be less than $2,000,000.The
project will not contribute funding in excess of the$2,000,000 cap.
The city will also need to determine where the additional PV will be
located.The project will provide space on site for the minimum
amount of PV required to run the essential services of the building
during an event.The project may also provide additional area for PV
which the city may use to install additional PV that would assist in
the project reaching net zero.
3. The Police,Fire and EOC personnel will need to develop new
workplace habits to reduce the impact of working in a Net Zero
Building.These cultural changes will need to be identified and a
workplace plan developed that will help migrate the culture over the
next two years.To facilitate these changes,the PM will need to work
closely with the users and consultants to develop the"Sustainable
Workplace Transition Plan"and will work with leadership to identify
those things that can be modified in the current building that will
migrate the impact on the employees from where they are today to
the PSB of tomorrow.
MOCA Systems Page 3
GSBS
n k:,i.i lfC ill t:i= • I ANfi CAPE d.R;.!IIIECTIURE-• INTERIOR LIE.;CN • Pt PNNtNQ ARCHITECTS
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building
Phase 2 - Criteria Design Report
October 6, 2010
Table of Contents
1. Process Summary
2. Architectural Narrative
3. Site Design Narrative
4. Civil Design Narrative
5. Structural System Narrative
6. Mechanical System Narrative
7. Electrical System Narrative
8. Technology System Narrative
9. Site Design Drawings
10. Architectural Drawings
11. Program Space Summary
375 WEST 200 SOUTH 7291 GLENVIEW DRIVE
SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84101 FORT WORTH,TX 76180
P 801.521 8600 P 817.589 1722
1 801 521 7913 F 817 595.2916 www.gsbsarchitects corn
GSBS ��
ARCHITECTURE • t AN 3SCAPE ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR DESIGN •PLANNING ARCHITECTS
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building
Phase 2 - Criteria Design Report
October 6, 2010
1. Process Summary
The Criteria Design Phase for the Salt Lake City Public Safety Building took place over
a six-week period and will conclude with a presentation to the Steering Committee on
October 6th, 2010.
Milestones
• On August 25th Okland Construction met with the Steering Committee and Design
Team for a project overview and summary of work to date.
• A week-long floor plan workshop was held August 30th through September 3rd at the
current PSB to present preliminary floor plan development to the various building
user groups and receive feedback. GSBS and MWL synthesized feedback given
during the first two days of the workshop and presented revised floor plans to the
Steering Committee on September 1st. They also presented options for location of a
second parking garage access ramp. The following two days were spent meeting
with additional user groups and continuing to develop the plans.
• On September 8th the project engineering consultants (Dunn, Spectrum, and Colvin)
joined the Steering Committee meeting to discuss their proposals for building
systems and ask questions to aid in the development of systems concepts.
• On September 15th Civitas joined GSBS to present concepts for site grading,
circulation, parking, plaza design and development of the pedestrian axis to the
Steering Committee. Initial building exterior design concepts and solar panel array
locations and configurations were presented as well.
• On September 21st GSBS presented further development of the exterior building
massing and articulation and configuration of the solar panel array to the Steering
Committee.
• On September 22nd members of the Steering Committee and Design Team traveled
to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) to tour its new research facility
and learn about their strategy and implementation for achieving a Net Zero design.
• On September 23rd Civitas presented to Steering Committee members revisions and
progress made to the ideas presented the previous week. The presentation included
significant progress made to master plan concepts for the larger block.
375 WEST 200 SOUTH 7291 GLENVIEW DRIVE
SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84101 FORT WORTH,TX 76180
P 801.521 8600 P 817.589 1722
r 801 521 7913 F 817 595 2916 www.9sbsarchitects.com
• A second floor plan workshop was held September 27th - 29th during which floor plan
progress was presented to the various building user groups. Over the course of three
days MWL and GSBS gathered feedback on the plans presented and worked with the
user groups to revise and fine-tune departmental layouts. Progress plans were
presented to the Steering Committee on September 29th
• From September 29th t° October 6th, the Design Team worked to resolve issues
identified and develop the concepts presented during the Criteria Design Phase.
• Throughout the Criteria Design Phase, GSBS worked with its engineering consultants
and MOCA to develop the project's Net Zero strategy, evaluate alternative
approaches to mechanical system design, and prepare data for presentation to
Mayor Becker, the City Council and their representatives.
Significant decisions of this phase
• The Celtic Bank parking area will be purchased by SLC to provide ground space for
parking needs, both public and PSB, and future development.
• A second ramp was added to the parking structure to provide two means of
entering and exiting the garage. This decision was based on security and
maintaining access in the event of a threat. The preferred location for the second
ramp was determined to be north of the mid-block axis. This decision lead to
extending the underground parking levels north to meet the ramp and narrowing
the parking levels on the east to align with the building edge.
• The entry, lobby, and vertical circulation core were shifted south to be centrally
located within the building. This aided in providing a clear diagram for security.
• The elevator core was split into two zones - one for staff and one for visitors.
• A continuous path of circulation was defined around the curved wall with an open
stair connecting levels two through four.
• Finish floor elevation was raised with respect to existing grade to allow finish floor at
level one to be roughly equivalent to grade at the plaza and "living room". A vertical
transition was then created along the south and west sides of the building.
• The curving form of the building was wrapped around the north side of the building
to more dynamically engage the outdoor "living room". The walls around the fourth
level have been moved inboard of the wall below and gently curved to soften the
impact of the building.
• The "living room" concept was evolved into a linear park along the mid-block axis.
• A continuous street running parallel and north of the mid-block axis will become
part of the master plan for the block. It is conceived as a street that is open to
vehicle traffic but gives priority to pedestrians and cyclists.
• Police and Fire Department vehicles will not be parked in the structure underground
due to height clearances and maneuverability. An on-grade structure was added,
east of Blair Street, for storage of five Police and three Fire vehicles.
• The decision was made to provide a stand-alone mechanical system for the PSB but
to make provisions for future connection to the central plant. Future connection will
be made when the central plant has been upgraded for efficiency. At that time, the
central plant will be the main system serving the PSB and the other will become the
redundant system.
Issues that remain unresolved
• The mechanical room is currently located on level four. Alden Breinholt and SLC
maintenance staff have asked the design team to look at moving it below grade to
the lower level of the parking garage. This request is currently being evaluated.
• The extension of the parking garage to the north will require relocation of
underground electrical lines. Lines need to be surveyed and located so the extent
and feasibility of relocation can be discussed with Rocky Mountain Power.
• Preliminary concerns have been raised by SLC Transportation regarding the
proximity of the south parking ramp to the intersection of Blair St. and 500 South
and the relationship of the north ramp to Blair St. A completed traffic study and
further conversation with SLC Transportation are required to define issues and work
toward resolution.
• The location and configuration of Blair Street east of the PSB compromises the 75
foot setback. Moving the curve in Blair St. north of the PSB property line would
resolve this conflict.
• The current plans show the 500 South curb line in its existing location. There has
been discussion of moving the curb line south and removing the angled parking to
gain more landscape area and reduce potential vehicle threat to building. No
decision has been made.
G S B S .. ,
APC.iiITECTUPE • IA1.DSCAPE ARCHI'ECTURE •147EPIOP CESlGN• Ff ANNiNC, ARCHITECTS
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building
Phase 2 - Criteria Design Report
October 6, 2010
2. Architectural Narrative
The new Public Safety Building is organized on four levels above grade with two levels
of below-grade parking. The building totals 160,835 SF. The parking garage totals
157,666 SF, which includes 17,019 SF of occupied program space on the upper parking
deck. Floor areas are as follows:
Level P2 = 78,773 SF
Level P1 = 78,893 SF
Level 1 = 49,114 SF
Level 2 = 42,263 SF
Level 3 = 37,191 SF
Level 4 = 32,267 SF
Parking Garage
The underground parking garage will be served by two enclosed ramps. One will occur
along and parallel to 500 South within the project property boundary. It will be
accessed from 500 South through the south end of Blair Street. The second ramp will
occur parallel to Blair Street north of the mid-block axis. It will be accessed from 400
South. The firm of Fehr and Peers is currently conducting a traffic study to validate the
proposed ramp locations. The ramps will be accessed through security doors at the top
ends of the ramps. The parking garage will be used by staff of the Public Safety
Building only. It will not serve the public. The garage is organized on a 30' x 30'
structural grid, which aligns vertically with the structure of the building above. Parking
capacity is 392 vehicles. An on-grade vehicle garage is located on the east side of Blair
Street to house over-sized Police and Fire Department vehicles. Its dimensions are
approximately 72'x72' .
Circulation
The garage will be used for parking of personal staff vehicles and department vehicles.
Parking garage ramps will be accessed through security doors. Staff not entering from
the garage will come through the main entry at level one or possibly a private
375 WEST 200 SOUTH 7291 GLENVIEW DRIVE
SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84101 FORT WORTH,TX 76180
P 801.521.8600 P 817.589.1722
F 801.521 7913 r-817 595.2916 www.gsbsarcbitects.com
secondary entrance on Blair Street. All visitors will enter through the main entry with
the exception of registered sex offenders who will be directed to a separate registrant
entrance on the Blair Street (east) side of the building. Staff and visitor elevators occur
in separate banks and all will require card access. Staff elevators will be accessed at all
floor levels and open into secure staff circulation zones. Visitor elevators will be
accessed between levels one and four and all will open into vestibules that are secured
from the remainder of the floor. Visitors will be escorted into elevators by security
personnel, and will only have access to the secure vestibules and the adjacent exit
stairs until they are met by a staff member and escorted to another room. Deliveries
enter the building through a secure service yard at level one. A service elevator is
located adjacent to the loading dock and will extend into the parking garage, through
the building and to the roof level.
Building Organization
The building is organized into two primary zones, area that is open to the public and
area that is secured for staff use and authorized visitors. All publicly accessible space is
located on level one. Spaces that occur north of the security counter do not require
security clearance. Spaces that occur south of the security counter require security
clearance (magnetometer) with the possible exception of the Records counter. Levels
two through four and the parking structure levels are secure staff floors. Visitors will
have access to these floors but will be monitored by security personnel and be
accompanied by credentialed staff.
The building is organized along a curving circulation spine that overlooks the lobby, the
exterior entry plaza and the civic district beyond. It is designed to create a visual
connection between the floors while maintaining limited visual access from level one.
The circulation spine, the visual connection and an adjacent open stair are designed to
foster communication and camaraderie amongst the staff of the Police, Fire and
Emergency Operations Departments. It will be abundantly daylit through a full-height
glass curtain wall and will provide a visual connection for the building occupants to the
city they serve. A combination of fragment retaining film and blast resistant framing
systems will protect the building's occupants from the threat of an explosion. In
certain critical spaces, ballistic resistant glazing will be used. Hardening of walls and
floors that separate the non-secured public space from the secured staff space beyond
and above is anticipated and will be studied further as the design is developed. Level
one contains the public spaces including community rooms, media briefing room,
museum, and store. It also contains the Fire Prevention and Medical Departments,
Police Records Department, Police Fusion, Internal Affairs and Meth Initiative
Departments, the Sex Offender Registrant, Quartermaster Department, Maintenance
Amok
Department, recycling room, loading dock, main electrical room and utility spaces.
Level two contains the Police Investigations Department, the main computer
equipment room, fitness room, locker and changing areas. Level three contains the
Police Dispatch Department, Fire Communications Department, Emergency Operation
Center, Salt Lake Information Center, Joint Information Center, and the main
lunchroom. Level four contains administration of the Police and Fire Departments. The
main mechanical room is also located on level four in an enclosed area. The walls
around the mechanical room will be finished with materials that are consistent with the
materials and quality of the surrounding walls.
Net Zero Strategy (see recommendations on following spreadsheet)
The new Public Safety Building is being designed as a net zero-energy building. Net
zero-energy can be defined in several ways depending on the goals and values
established for a project. The new PSB is being designed to fit the definition of Net
Zero Energy Emissions. This means that the new building will produce at least as much
emissions-free renewable energy as it uses from emissions-producing energy sources.
Achieving Net Zero will be done through a combination of reducing energy loads and
creating renewable energy. Energy use reduction will be handled through building and
systems design, building operations, and occupant energy management programs.
Creation of renewable energy will occur through photovoltaic panel arrays
incorporated into the PSB building and site.
Based on the current energy model, the proposed building will emit 600 metric tons/yr
of CO2-eq. The energy model assumes the most aggressive approach to energy
efficiency. To offset this amount of pollution emission, the project will require 3,000
high performance photovoltaic modules (at 19% efficient with 15 degree tilt), which is
946 kWpdc or 53,000 SF. Based on these numbers, the cost of the photovoltaics is
estimated at $5,000 per kWpdc or $4,730,000. It should be noted that these numbers
will change as the design develops and decision-making continues. The final array size
will likely be in the range of 40,000 SF to 80,000 SF.
A significant amount of the required array will be accommodated on site. It may not be
possible, however, to locate the entire required square footage on site, in which case
SLC will look for alternate off-site locations. The areas designated to receive
photovoltaic panels include the large canopy above the entry plaza (currently 12.100 SF
of panel), the shade canopy that extends over the south building facade (currently -wok
5,500 SF of panel), the roof over level four (currently 11,550 SF of panel), and the roof
of the vehicle garage east of Blair Street (currently 4,400 SF of panel). The solar panels
will be funded through a combination of grants, construction budget, and power
purchase agreements.
Exterior Building Materials
The primary exterior building materials being considered for the new Public Safety
Building are composite precast concrete panels and aluminum curtain wall glazing. The
pre-cast panels will likely have a smooth finish with joints expressed on a five foot
module horizontally and a two foot module vertically. The composite panels will include
an internal layer of continuous insulation such that the panel provides an R-value of 15.
Curtain wall glazing will have expressed horizontal mullions at interior and exterior
faces. Vertical mullions will be frameless at the building exterior with mullions at the
building interior. The current energy model includes window systems that are thermally
broken and triple glazed. Glazing is comprised of a ' " outer layer of high performance
glass (such as Solarban 70), an inner layer of Low-E and solar-reflectant film (such as
Heat Mirror 88), a layer of fragment retaining film, and an inner layer of clear glazing.
The layers are separated by 3/8" air gaps.
Solar control on the south-facing elevation will be accomplished with horizontal glass
shading devices with ceramic frit. Solar control on the west and east-facing elevations
will be accomplished with vertical glass shading devices (on south sides of windows)
with ceramic frit. Connections to the wall structure will be made with stainless steel
hardware. At window interiors, solar control will be achieved either with a translucent
light shelf or a vertically-mounted, rigid louver-type product (such as LightLouver or
Retrolux).
Terraced roofs at the north side of the building will be a combination of green roof and
precast concrete pavers. Each of the two roof levels will have a small deck area for
staff use - slightly less than 750 square feet, in order to limit occupancy and the need
for a second means of egress. The green roof will likely be an extensive system with 4
to 8 inches of lightweight growing medium over a drainage layer and roof membrane.
The system should include irrigation. Plant material will be low-profile, drought-tolerant
sedum and groundcover. Deck area will be precast concrete pavers on pedestals over
a roof membrane. The small roof which covers the main building entry will also be
planted roof. The remainder of the roof will be a single-ply membrane over which
photovoltaic array will be located.
Interior Building Materials
Interior finishes will be selected as the design develops. In general, the building interior
will be as transparent as is functional and practical for the uses held within. Frameless
glazing will be used along hallways, whether low or high, to allow borrowed light.
Lobby and public spaces will be finished with hard, durable and timeless materials. The
range of materials being considered include stone, terrazzo, or polished concrete
floors; gypsum board, stone, tile, or wood wall finishes; gypsum board and/or
acoustical cloud ceilings. Staff and private spaces will be finished with comfortable,
durable materials. The range of materials being considered include carpet, carpet tile,
polished concrete or resilient flooring such as rubber; gypsum board walls with a
durable chair rail or wainscot material; high NRC (noise reduction coefficient)
acoustical ceiling panels or clouds. Finishes along the curved circulation spine on the
upper levels will be finished with materials consistent with those used in the main
lobby.
Zoning Code Review
Zoning code review was based on the Salt Lake City Code Title 21A. As stated in
MOCA's Site Considerations document, three zoning possibilities have been identified
for the Public Safely Building site through meetings with SLC Planning and Zoning. The
three zones are PL-2 (Public Lands), Institutional, and Urban Institutional. After
reviewing the purposes and requirements of the various zones, it is the
recommendation of the design team that the site be zoned PL-2. As noted by MOCA,
the library falls within this zone.
Requirements of the PL-2 zone are as follows:
• Maximum building height = 75 feet
o For local government facilities and government offices
o Provided that where adjacent to a zoning district allowing greater
height, the height standard of the adjacent district shall apply.
• Minimum Yard Requirements
o Front yard = 20 feet
o Corner side yard = 20 feet
o Interior side yard = None
o Rear yard = None
• Accessory buildings and structures in yards
o Accessory building and structures may be located in required yard
areas.
• Landscape yards
o All front and corner side yards shall be maintained as landscaped yards
Off Street Parking for general office use are as follows:
• 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for the main floor plus 1
spaces per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for each additional level,
including the basement
• 50x3 = 150
• 43x1 '1/4 = 54
• 38x1 ''A = 48
• 33 x 1 ''A. 42
• Total required = 294/Total provided = 392
Building Code Review
The new Public Safety Building will be designed to meet the requirements of the IBC
2009.
• Occupancy Classification
o Business Group B (main occupancy)
o Assembly Group A-3 (including community rooms, media briefing room,
fitness room)
o Storage Group S-2 (including parking garage)
• Construction Type
Construction type will be finalized when the structural system is selected. Types
IB and IIA, both non-combustible, are suitable choices for the building. Based on
fire separation distance on the PSB site, exterior walls will not require a rating.
o Type IB requires a two-hour fire-resistance rating for primary structural
frame, interior and exterior bearing walls, floor construction and
secondary members, and a one-hour fire-resistance rating for roof
construction and secondary members. This construction type can be
achieved without increases for area or height. Sprinklers could
potentially be substituted for the one-hour rating required at the roof
pending approval of the SLC Building Official.
o Type IIA requires a one-hour fire-resistance rating for primary structural
members, interior and exterior bearing walls, floor construction and
secondary members, and roof construction and secondary members.
Frontage and fire sprinkler increases would be needed to meet
limitations on allowable area and height.
• Special Detailed Requirements based on use and occupancy
o Atriums
The opening that connects the floors of levels two through four and is
open to level one will be classified as an atrium and as such will be
required to have a smoke control system. The walls that separate the
curved circulation spine from the rest of the floor areas will be required
to be one-hour fire barriers. The design team intends to explore
Exception 1 to Section 404.6 to use a glass wall as a smoke partition.
o Open parking garages
A goal of the project is to use natural ventilation in the parking structure
to reduce energy use and reach Net Zero. The parking garage is
designed with areaways of the size required to be classified as an open
parking garage. The classification is pending approval by the SLC
Building Official.
• Fire and Smoke Protection Features
Shaft enclosures will have a two-hour fire-resistance rating where connecting
four stories or more and not less than one-hour where connecting less than four
stories. .
• Fire Protection Systems
The building will be equipped throughout with an approved automatic fire
sprinkler system including the parking garage levels.
• Means of Egress
The three enclosed stairways will have two-hour fire-resistive ratings. The south
stair's rated enclosure will extend to the building exterior. The north stair's
enclosure will end at level one. In order to do this, the entire level one floor will
have a two-hour fire-resistive rating.
SALT LAKE CITY-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING CIVITAS
PRELIMINARY NARRATIVE-PUBLIC REALM
OCTOBER 06, 2010
• Plaza to be sand set narrow modular concrete unit pavers
• Perimeter walks to be standard gray concrete with sand finish
• Retaining Walls/Detention Area Walls to be precast concrete or natural
stone. Along the east side of proposed building all top of walls are 12-18"
above finish grade. Along southern side of proposed building,all proposed
walls are cantilevered over parking garage canopy lid
• Required detention for site drainage to be located within underground
parking structure
• Free standing/Seat Walls to be precast concrete or natural stone walls
• Bollards along either side of woonerf to be stainless steel fixed bollards
• Bollards at both west and east end of woonerf to be retractable bollards
• Retractable bollards at either end of Blair Street
• Planting areas within plaza to be 75%ornamental shrubs and 25%lawn. All
planting in plaza will be raised beds over parking structure
• All trees along west side of 300 East are existing(on Library property)
• Large trees along west side of proposed Public Safety Building are existing,to
remain.
• All other trees around perimeter are proposed shade trees
• Trees within the plaza area are Ornamental
• Please note revised curb alignment along 300 East on the eastern edge. This
begins on the south side of 500 South and continues north to the intersection
of 400 South.
• The mid block crossing on 300 East is proposed to be a raised "table top"
concrete with sand finish
• All striping/paint/parking meters are to be redone/relocated along 300 East
• All paint/parking meters are to be redone/relocated along 500 South,
northern side
• Plaza area and pedestrian spine to have specialty lighting
• Plaza area to have custom water feature,approximately 800 sf
• Proposed art work in median of 300 East(northern Y of block)
• Plaza to have movable 15 tables with movable chairs(4 chairs per table)
• Walls around service yard on east side of building to be living green walls
• Planted green roof on 3rd and 4th levels of north east corner of building,as well
as over entry to building 1200 Bannock Street
Denver, Colorado 80209
• Blair Street to be entirely new curb/gutter/with standard street lighting Tel 303 571.0053
fax 303 825 0438
w ww,ci vi(asinc.coal
F.\2010\2-10-0019 SLC Public Safety Building\design\06_cost estimates\2010.10-06_prehminary narrative.docx
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building
For:
GSBS Architects
375 West 200 South, Suite 100
Salt Lake City, UT
u k _ _
tr-
ii - , .
,„..„,„ -.....„. ,.. _ ;:,
.4, . .
... .
..,..„.„
..,,,,4, :
. . ,.
t ., ,
i .i. , vi.,
,.. , „ , , , .., .
,:. , ,.c.• ) ;, .:.
,i1i1siC
Prepared By:
Stanley Consultants, Inc.
October 5, 2010
Stanley Project 22844
Q:\22844\06-Studies\04-Studies\101005 Civil Criteria Design Narrative REV02.docx
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 2
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Background:
As part of the planning and design for the proposed Salt Lake City Public Safety
Building to be located on the Barnes Block, Stanley Consultants was retained to
provide engineering services related to the following tasks:
• Site Paving, Grading and Drainage
• Water, Fire Protection, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drainage Utilities
• Storm Water Detention
• Roadway Modifications to 300 East
• Extension of Blair Street
Based upon information related to number of occupants, gross area of the site,
access requirements and other Public Safety Building design criteria developed
by the project team, initial design information for the Site Civil task was
developed. This Civil Criteria Design Report summarizes information gathered
and findings to date.
Stanley Consultants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 3
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Site Paving, Grading and Drainage:
Site Paving:
As of the date of this report, site paving requirements have not been fully
identified. Our understanding of site paving requirements includes the City's
desire to minimize on-street parking to the extent possible. Employee parking will
be primarily located in an underground parking structure on site. Limited visitor
parking will be provided adjacent to the facility on 500 South and at the Library
parking facility. Visitor parking requirements have not yet been fully identified. It
is expected that overall quantities of paving at the site will be reduced as a result
of the project, potentially reducing site runoff. The reduction of surface parking
area on the site will also provide a runoff water quality benefit.
Site paving will include improvements to 500 South (possible visitor parking),
improvements to 300 South and incidental paving related to underground garage
access, plaza pedestrian paving and incidental paving required for planters,
sidewalks and related amenities. It is anticipated that Portland cement concrete
paving will provide the best sustainability and life-cycle benefit for these uses.
Plaza pavements have not yet been identified, but it is anticipated that either
conventional Portland cement concrete or a permeable pavement system will be
provided. A permeable pavement system is suggested for consideration as a
means to reduce project related stormwater runoff impacts.
Through discussions with the Owner's representatives, several unique vehicle
types were identified that needed to be accommodated on site. A vehicle swept
area analysis was prepared for use in identifying access limitations, turning
movements and related site planning information. The unique vehicles and the
closest standard vehicle corollary (based upon wheelbase, overall length and
width) were:
• Bomb Truck: Smeal Pumper Wildlands Interface
• Robot Truck: Medtec FD-160
• Bomb Trailer: Big Tex 10ET-16 Auto Hitch
• Tactical Operations Center: Freightliner 20 ft. Reefer -or-
Oshkosh Mk23 Standard Cargo
• Rescue Vehicle: Medtec FD-160
Refer to Appendix A for detailed information related to unique vehicles,
equivalent standard vehicle, and suggested turning templates.
EP_
Stanley Consultants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 4
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Grading:
The existing site slopes generally from northeast to southwest. It is anticipated
that the existing drainage pattern will be retained as part of final design. It is
anticipated that construction of the facility will result in a significant amount of
excavated material from the underground parking structure that will require off-
site disposal. A balanced grading site design, although desirable, is not
considered reasonably feasible given the expected excavation volumes resulting
from the project.
Upon completion of preliminary design of access locations, driveways and
related grade-critical items, preliminary site grading will be developed to promote
positive drainage away from the building envelope to collection and detention
facilities. Overall site slopes will generally be to the southwest corner of the
Barnes block. Site grading will provide the means to collect the majority of the
runoff generated on the site.
Drainage:
Storm drainage facilities will include provisions to collect and detain roof
drainage, plaza and site drainage, and flows generated by foundation drains or
dewatering systems. Design of storm drainage improvements has not
commenced, pending development of preliminary site plans and building
improvements.
As the design process proceeds, site and plaza elements will be identified and
located. The overall approach to site drainage is flexible enough to incorporate
water gardens, landscaping and other sustainability practices in the final
drainage system design.
GP_
Stanley Consultants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 5
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Water, Sewer and Storm Drainage Utilities:
Potable Water:
The project site is located in an area with very high levels of water supply system
redundancy. The largest demand items on the project will be fire water, cooling
water, and irrigation water, in that order. Currently, the requirements for fire,
cooling and irrigation have not been fully identified.
The requirements for full redundancy of the potable water supply (two
independent connections) are being evaluated, with final determination expected
prior to beginning the preliminary design phase. Each system will meet the
following requirements:
Assumptions: Total Staff = 435
Office building with showers: 25 gallons per day per person
Peaking Factor = 5.0
Calculated Peak Day Culinary Water Demand = 10,875 gallons
Peak Instantaneous Demand = (10,875/1440 min/day) x 5.0 peak factor
= 38 gallons per minute
Notes: Fire demand requirements are not included in the Peak
Instantaneous Demand value. The Salt Lake City or County Fire
Marshall will determine fire demand requirements as the building
and site design are developed.
Mechanical system water demands are not included in the Peak
Instantaneous Demand value. Mechanical system water demands
will be identified by the Mechanical design consultant in the future
as mechanical system requirements are identified.
Irrigation system water demands are not included in the Peak
Instantaneous Demand value. Irrigation demand requirements will
be identified by GSBS in the future as landscaping designs are
developed.
Based upon culinary water alone, a 2" meter commercial
connection will be adequate. The connection fee for a 2" meter is
about $15,000. We expect a larger meter will be required, up to
about 4". With all fees, a 4" connection could be as much as
$50,000. These are not large connections, so there is a wide
degree of flexibility for connection location. If it is expected that
Stanley Consuttants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 6
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
mow
culinary, fire, and cooling water will have redundant connections,
double connection fees to accommodate this requirement.
Fire Protection Water:
Fire demand requirements have not been fully developed by the Mechanical
Engineer and the Fire Marshall. Stanley will assist in the design of the fire
protection system connection to the City's water system. Design of the fire
protection system per se is not included as part of this study.
In general, water mains surrounding the Barnes block are not adequate to meet
expected fire protection requirements. Current water/fire protection infrastructure
at the Barnes block includes:
• A single 6" main on 300 East.
• Two (2) 6" mains on 400 South
• A 6" and a 4" main on 400 East
• A 6" and a 30" main on 500 South
The current industry standard for fire protection mains is minimum 8" diameter. In
order to provide adequate fire protection for the proposed Public Safety complex,
the single 6" main on 300 East should be upgraded to a minimum 12" main and
connected to the existing 30" main on 500 South.
Required improvements to water mains, identified in the "Quick Start Program
Report" remain valid at this time.
Sanitary Sewer:
Sewer demand is driven by both culinary water demand and cooling system
blow-down. Cooling system blow-down volumes, frequency and duration have
not been fully identified as of the date of this report.
Sanitary sewer mains exist around the entire perimeter of the Barnes block and
along the northern portion of Blair Street. The mains do not appear to have
capacity limitations and should be adequate for the proposed Public Safety
complex with minimal modification.
For sanitary flows only, preliminary design criteria is as follows:
Assumptions: Peak sanitary sewer discharge rates are similar to peak
culinary rates (38 gpm)
Notes: Existing sewer mains are along both the south and west perimeters
of the site and can accept flows from the Public Safety Building.
Stanley Consuttants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 7
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Expected peak discharge rates do not include Mechanical system
drain requirements or blow-down volumes. Sanitary sewer flow
rates will be amended to include mechanical requirements as the
design proceeds and these requirements can be identified by
mechanical team.
The expected discharge rates represent less than 10% of the
conveyance capacity of a nominal 8"gravity sewer main at
minimum slope. We anticipate that adequate volume is available in
the existing sewer mains and that replacement or significant
modifications will not be required.
Based upon culinary use alone, a 4" service lateral would be
adequate. The connection fee for a 4" lateral is less than $1000. It
is not anticipated that a sewer connection larger than 8"will be
required. Connection fee for an 8"sewer (private main) would be
approximately $20,000. It is not anticipated that redundant sewer
connections will be required.
Storm Drainage:
Existing storm drainage conveyances exist at the northwest, southwest and
southeast corners of the block. Communications with Salt Lake City Public
Utilities (SLCPU) staff indicate that these conveyances are adequate for current
conditions. Because detention facilities will be provided as part of this project,
stormwater discharge rates from the site will decrease, suggesting than new
conveyances will not be required to serve the Barnes block.
Refer to Exhibit, following page, for existing utility information for the project area.
Earl
Stanley Consultants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 8
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
••
* 1111111.
•
•
•
•
•
sow
„,..
t .
I •
•
' . A
1 a
Ia. I
• •••
•
••
oft
0
•
••••
‘011•TYR
•••••••
A----
•
Ea
••••••
•
•
If wad.
orimmott.
—sot
yof -
111
4.
Prtnong Dare 2/V2010
Fde Nitbciatait nue
0 50 100
5011 Lat.Crty Pubic Ubbbes ,,"1.,77
ININIC=10100 Feet
Barnes Block— Existinu Utilities Atimik
410
Stanley Consultants eic
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 9
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Storm Water:
Because it is expected that at least 15,000 square feet of impervious area will be
removed and replaced as part of the overall Public Safety complex project, storm
drainage impacts both during and after construction activities will be mitigated to
meet current storm water regulations. A SWPPP will be prepared and
implemented during construction to address the requirements of NPDES Phase II
regulations.
Although the net impervious area of the project area will probably decrease from
the existing conditions at the site, post-construction stormwater detention will be
required. Net discharge from the site cannot exceed 0.2 cfs per tributary acre
after completion of construction activities. Because of space limitations on the
site, it appears that subsurface detention facilities will be provided in lieu of
conventional surface stormwater detention ponds. The initial design requirement
for stormwater detention is as follows:
Assumptions: Existing off-site conveyances are adequate for current
conditions at the site.
Tributary area for new drainage = 4.6 acres
Design Storm Event = 100 year return, 24 hour duration
Approximate Impervious area: 80%
Allowable outflow rate = 0.2 cfs/acre (0.92 cfs for 4.6 acre
site)
The calculated detention volume, using a Rational Method approach = 0.5
acre-feet (21,500 cubic feet)
Notes: The best location for detention will be near the lowest point of the
project site, near the southwest corner.
Significant modifications to, or replacement of, the storm drainage
system near the point of discharge (southwest corner of site)
should not be required. Proposed discharge rates are expected to
be well below current discharge rates under similar conditions.
On-site conveyances and collection system facilities will be
required to serve roof drainage, foundation drainage and
plaza/parking area drainage.
Detention volume calculations do not include foundation drainage
requirements. To date, estimates of this "base flow" through the
drainage system have not been quantified. We recommend that
detention requirements of approximately 30,000 cubic feet in
available volume be provided.
Stanley Consultants .
Salt Lake City Public Safely Building 10
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
It is expected that a detention vault will be constructed near the
southwest corner of the site, in the area provided for building offset.
The typical construction cost for subsurface detention facilities are
at least $7-10 per cubic foot of storage. These systems should be
designed with at least two feet of "dead' volume to account for
sediment accumulation.
Stanley Consuttants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 11
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
300 East:
The overall site design for access onto 300 East and to the Public Safety Building
has not been fully developed at this time. Lane configurations are being
evaluated to determine preferred alternatives. In general, mid-street parking
along 300 East will be eliminated and the overall width of 300 east (curb to curb)
will be reduced from 400 South to 500 South. Additional park strip and buffer
area will be created as a result of street narrowing.
As part of the team design effort, Stanley Consultants was asked to review traffic
patterns along 300 East, with particular attention to the intersections at 400
South and 500 South. These cursory investigations are summarized as follows:
Existing Traffic Configuration on 300 East:
Northbound on 300 East at 400 South there are currently a total of four lanes
(two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane)
Southbound on 300 East at 500 South there are currently a total of two lanes
(one through lane, and one right turn lane).
There is also a bike lane on each side of 300 East with angled parking along the
west curb and in middle of the road.
Future Traffic Configuration on 300 East:
The most recent site plan for the Public Safety building shifted the east curb on
300 East approximately 22.5' to the west by removing the angled parking in the
middle of the road, adding a 7.5' wide raised median with trees, maintaining five
foot bike lanes on each side of the road, and reducing the number of northbound
traffic lanes from four lanes to one lane at 400 South.
If the northbound lanes are shifted to the west, the northbound through lane on
300 East south of 500 South will also have to be shifted to the west so that the
lanes line up across the intersection.
The proposed site plan does not change the traffic capacity for southbound traffic
on 300 East, but it does significantly reduce the traffic capacity northbound on
300 East at 400 South. No traffic analysis has been completed to evaluate the
impact of reducing the number of northbound traffic lanes on 300 East. The
traffic lanes must be aligned across the intersections, and northbound on 300
East we anticipate that at a minimum two lanes should be provided (one
northbound left turn lane, and one northbound through lane). Maintaining a
northbound right turn lane on 300 East at 400 South would also improve traffic
flow. The Salt Lake City Transportation Department will probably require a traffic
Stanley Consultants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 12
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
study before they would approve the removal of any existing traffic lanes. I did
check with Salt Lake City Transportation staff and they do not have any current
peak hour traffic counts on 300 East near the project.
The removal of the angled parking in the middle of the 300 East and the removal
of the access to the parking for the Public Safety building from 300 East will
reduce the vehicular/bicycle conflicts on 300 East, and would result in a slight
decrease in traffic volume on 300 East.
Stanley Consuttants.�
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 13
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Blair Street:
Blair Street currently extends approximately half the north-south width of the
Barnes Block. It is currently envisioned that Blair Street will be extended from
mid-block southward through to a connection with 500 South. Two traffic lanes
are to be provided, with a total width of 24 feet. The proposed geometrics of the
modifications to Blair Street have not been fully developed pending evaluation of
turning movement requirements, access requirements for public and/or restricted
traffic, gating, and related design considerations.
raw ANN
Existing Extent of
Blair Street .
S
i !`4'.1.
i t
� • $ • r
t .
}
0 11111,4 Proposed Extension
of Blair Street
t t
t 8 ,, :,: --
EIMMO
WRNS
MINIM 1 ......
r..
Malt
The extension of Blair Street will facilitate access to the Public Safety building
and helps to meet the City's long-range planning goals for the area.
Stanley Consultants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 14
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Conclusions and Recommendations:
1. Initial calculations indicate adequate capacity for potable and fire
protection water supply to the site. Improvements to mains adjacent to the
site to meet current design standards have been identified and are
required.
2. Requirements for fire protection flow, irrigation and cooling system water
demands have not been identified. Water supply connection requirements
will need to be revised once these demands have been identified.
3. Adequate available capacity exists adjacent to the site to provide
conveyance of sanitary sewer flows generated by the new facility.
4. Requirements for sanitary sewer flows resulting from cooling system blow-
down, garage structures and other incidental sewer discharges have not
been identified. Sewer discharge connection requirements will need to be
revised once these demands have been identified.
5. Approximately 30,000 cubic feet of subsurface stormwater detention
volume should be provided near the southwest corner of the site.
Foundation drainage and dewatering requirements have not been
identified. Overall stormwater conveyance and detention requirements
may require revision once these volumes have been identified.
6. The project site offers excellent overall water supply redundancy. The
need for full water supply connection redundancy (main to building
connection) should be verified prior to final design.
Stanley Consultants
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 15
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Appendix A: Vehicle Turning Data
}leicht Width .Length Wheel Base Other
Need 12x12 door; — —,
Bomb Truck 10'4" 9'4" 27'3" 16'6" Can Share bay with
Bomb Trailer
Need 12x12 door;
Robot Truck 11'4" 9'4" 21'6" 11'6" Can Share Bay with
Bomb Trailer
Can Share Bay with
Bomb Trailer 8'7" 9'7" 20'3" Bomb Truck or 1
Robot Truck
Tactical Operations Center 13' 9'6" 26' 15'2" Can Share Bay with .
the R.V.
Rescue Vehicle 10' 9'6" 21' 10' Can Share Bay with
the T.O.C.
Bomb Truck Equivalent Vehicle:
/ OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH
711144,W �>
64610E SWEPT PATH
� I
a t
29n f,\
- STEERING LOCK ANGLE•360 deg
187 6 NM ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE
1w ! 3041e2 SWEEP ANGLE 204 deg
•r; 66 deg SWEEP ANGLE 294 deg
6GE—
Wdeg SWEEP ANGLE 34.4deg
120 deg SWEEP ANGLE 366 deg
� 150 deg SWEEP ANGLE 31.6649.
160de9 SWEEP ANGLE 364 deg
I 846 I
i
Smeal Pumper Wildiands Interface
�TSEXT-Emergency
t
Stanley Consultants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 16
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Amok
Robot Truck Equivalent Vehicle
I
'+ t OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH
INSIDE SWEPT PATH
1
29ft gym 213R
STEERING LOCK ANGLE•98 I deg
13.2 It —
ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE:
30 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:
3 deg.
60 deg SWEEP ANGLE:29.5 deg
5.5 ft 90 deg SWEEP ANGLE:33.8 deg
120 deg SWEEP ANGLE:36.0 dog
8.0 ft 160 dog SWEEP ANGLE:37.1 dog.
180 deg SWEEP ANGLE:376 deg
Medtec FD-160
TSEXT-Emergency
[ft]
to 24.14 i1prceekSw,nc.e
,o I 4F,
Stanley Consultants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 17
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Tactical Operations Center Equivalent Vehicle
4101
6d
OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH
90>
INSIDE SWEPT PATH
1
• a !
37fl 1+.4 37.40
Eel STEERING LOCK ANGLE=24.2 Ong
15 3 ft - ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE:
30 deg SWEEP ANGLE.17.0 deg
60 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:22 0 deg
00 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:23 S deg
7 2 g 120 deg.SWEEP ANGLE.24.0 deg
192,090 SWEEP ANGLE•24.24100
620 I 100 deg SWEEP ANGLE 242 deg.
Oshkosh MK23 Standard Cargo
TSEXT-Military
tO°,I(el20a r,..ag4Wp.wI Of fro
v
Stanley Consultants INC
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 18
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Amok
Bomb Trailer Equivalent Vehicle
O3ITSVE 9WEP1 PPAIN
9V
'MAX 9WEPI PATH
f. II
1111
].tA IR aee
STEERING tUCIC ANGtt*,42aA9
I I
1L1eEVE�St[SemRl h40LE
IAOA AO Oe9 SWEEP AWL*10A deg
— COOP.9WEE13AM'ttE:21A Oep `
9Otlq SWe�'A34CLE:2i 7Ae9
-. 30039 SWEEP MIGI.E II7Oe3
1300333 BWEEPM 3 E OOdeq
•AOdog(*NW M0C1.CI.E 1<OOp
.13
AAA I I
E9e
Big Tex 10ET-16 Auto Hitch
TSEXT-Transport
,AAA
Stanley Consultants .
Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 19
Site Civil Criteria Design Report
Rescue Truck Equivalent Vehicle
/-.
Q!
0
//
/ OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH
/
I/
/ y g>
/I
W S\It1F\S\WEPT PATH
--N\---\---\----*\_\,''''`..
29I 21.3fl I \
STEERING LOCK ANGLE=38 1 deg 2--,
13 2 t ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE: \
' 30 deg.SWEEP ANGLE.20 3 dog \
60 deg SWEEP ANGLE 33.8 deg. \
SSR 90 deg SWEEP ANGLE'33.8 deg, \\\\\
— 120 deg SWEEP ANGLE'36 0 deg
E.0 fl I 150 deg SWEEP ANGLE:37.1 deg
180 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:37.6 deg \\ ........0,4,%;.\\;1:\
Medtec FD-160
TSEXT-Emergency ft1
„00,kg w 201O hweGM. 00
0.T ,OFT ¶ Co7
40
Stanley Consultants INC
DUNN
DUNN ASSOCIATES,INC
Consulting Structural Engineers
MEMO
Date: September 27, 2010
To: Kevin Miller,AIA
GSBS Architects
From: Paul W. McMullin, S.E., Ph.D.
RE: PSB Structural Criteria
This memo summarizes the structural design criteria for the Public Safety Building. The
structural design criteria were developed during meetings and discussions with the Steering
Committee and GSBS.
The primary focus for the structural design is on the following four areas: (1) efficient Gravity
Framing, (2) Seismic Performance, and (3) Progressive Collapse Resistance.
Baseline structural design criteria are presented in the attached page from our General
Structural notes. This identifies codes, gravity and environmental loads, and blast and
progressive collapse performance criteria.
The remainder of this document further elaborates the structural design criteria.
1) The building will meet the essential facility(Occupancy Category IV) requirements of
the IBC 2009 for gravity, snow, and wind loading.
2) Seismic design will be performance based utilizing a non-linear dynamic time-history
analysis, as outlined in ASCE 41-06. This is the state-of-the art in seismic analysis
and design. The baseline performance objective is Immediate Occupancy at the
maximum credible earthquake(2%/50)and Life Safety at the 84%deterministic
spectrum (beyond 2%/50). This provides significantly greater performance compared
to an IBC design.
3) The Immediate Occupancy performance objective does not necessarily address non
structural damage which can have a significant impact on building operations
following a major earthquake. During the selection of the main lateral force resisting
system for the building(yet to be determined)consideration will be given as to the
effects this system has on non structural seismic performance. In addition, project
specific seismic design criteria will be issued with the bid documents which will
380 West 800 South,Suite 100 Salt Lake City,Utah 84101 phone:801-575-8877 fax:801-575-8875 www.dunn-se.com
EJDUNNJ
include a pre-qualification requirement for sub contractors and their engineers for the
seismic attachment of non-structural components.
4) Progressive Collapse resistance will be evaluated and designed for according to the
GSA Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines(June 2003).
5) Various admixtures and epoxy coated rebar will be evaluated for use in the parking
garage to extend the service life of the structure.
BASIS OF DESIGN
1. Governing Building Code International Building Code 2009
2. Seismic Design Code ASCE 41-06
3. Progressive Collapse Resistance Code GSA Progressive Collapse Analysis and
Design Guidelines(June 2003)
4. Occupancy Category IV
5. Floor Live Loads
5.1. Uniformly Distributed Loads
5.1.1. Offices+Partitions 80 psf+20 psf
5.1.2. Lobbies&Main Floor Corridors 100 psf
5.1.3. Corridors Above Main Floor 80 psf
5.1.4. Mechanical Rooms 150 psf
5.1.5. Parking Garages 40 psf
5.1.6. Storage/High-Load Areas As identified on plan
5.2. Concentrated Loads,all areas 2000 lbs
6. Roof Live Load(Not concurrent with Roof Snow Load) 20 psf
7. Roof Snow Load
7.1. Ground Snow Load Pg=43 psf
7.2. Flat Roof Snow Load Pf=36 psf
7.3. Snow Exposure Factor Ce=1.0
7.4. Thermal Factor Ct=1.0
7.5. Snow Load Importance Factor Is=1.20
8. Wind Load
8.1. Basic Wind Speed(3 Second Gust) 90 mph
8.2. Wind Importance Factor 1.15
8.3. Wind Exposure B
8.4. Internal Pressure Coefficient t 0.18
9. Seismic Design Criteria
9.1. Basic Seismic Force Resisting System TO BE DETERMINED
9.2. IBC 2009 Criteria
9.2.1. Seismic Importance Factor 1.50
9.2.2. Seismic Design Category D
9.2.3. Analysis Procedure Non-Linear Dynamic,Time History
9.3.4. Acceptance Criteria ASCE 41-06,Non-Linear
9.4. Seismic Performance Criteria(ASCE 41)
5 9.4.1. Immediate Occupancy 2%/50
9.4.2. Life Safety 84th Percentile Deterministic
9.4.3. See PSIIURS report dated??9??for dynamic time histories and response spectra.
N 9.4.4. See this sheet for floor accelerations for design of non-structural equipment and bracing.
10. Progressive Collapse Resistance Criteria
c 10.1. Method of Progressive Collapse Analysis Alternate Path
10.2. Progressive Collapse Resisting System Perimeter Moment Frames
$ 10.3. Future Additions or Alterations to this structure shall not jeopardize the requirements for progressive
collapse resistance.
11. Serviceability Criteria
11.1. Interstory Seismic Drift See Table this sheet ""°
11.2. Deflection Limits Total Live/Snow
Floor U360 U480
0
Roof U240 U360
Perimeter — U600(318"max)
SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
MECHANICAL CRITERIA DESIGN NARRATIVE
GENERAL BUILDING DESCRIPTION
Office building with four above-grade floors and two below-grade parking levels. Building
includes the city's emergency operations center. The total building gross square footage is
approximately 166,000 square feet, excluding the parking levels and mechanical room. At this
time the building is not classified as a high-rise.
APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS
Conform to the latest edition of the following codes and standards, or the requirements defined in
this program, whichever is more restrictive:
2009 IBC
2009 IMC
2009 IPC
2009 IFC
2009 IECC
The project will achieve a LEED NC rating. The level of certification is to be silver.
AVAILABLE UTILITIES
Culinary Water
Culinary water to be provided by connecting to the existing municipal water line in the street. A
domestic water pressure boosting pump system is not anticipated at this time.
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary waste leaving the building will be connected to the existing municipal sewer line in the
street. It is anticipated that all sanitary waste leaving the office floors of the building will gravity
flow to the existing municipal sewer line. Sanitary waste leaving the below-grade garage levels
will be pumped by a combination of grey water pumps and sewage ejectors.
Storm Sewer
Storm water collected from the roof of the building will need to be retained on site, then will
gravity flow at a reduced rate prescribed by the city to the existing municipal storm sewer line in
the street.
Fire Sprinkler Service
The water required by the fire sprinkler system in the building will be provided by a dedicated
fire sprinkler service line that will connect to the existing municipal water line in the street.
Natural Gas
Natural gas will be routed from the existing Questar gas line in the street to the gas meter located
on the side of the building. Questar gas will provide the gas meter.
Diesel Fuel
A diesel fuel storage tank will be buried on-site and will serve the generator and provide the
boilers with a secondary fuel source.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Temperature
Reference ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook,2009 Edition.
Outdoor design temperatures: winter 9.3 °F
summer 97.4DB/63.5wB°F
Indoor design temperatures:
Maintain internal spaces at the following temperatures, +/-2°F. Occupied and unoccupied
schedules to be specified:
Occupied Unoccupied
Cooling Heating Cooling Heating
Normally occupied spaces 75 72 80 60
Data Room Cold Aisles 77 77 77 77
Utility Spaces,including NA 60 NA 60
mechanical rooms
All temperatures are dry bulb temperatures.
Noise
The building mechanical systems will be designed with the following RC Mark II method for
rating HVAC system related noise in mind,with the following design guidelines:
Room Type RC(N)
Private Offices 35
Open Plan Offices 40
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 2
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
Conference Rooms 35
Corridors 45
Atrium/Lobbies 45
Note that the proposed noise levels in the table above are for the mechanical equipment only,and does not account
for noise generated by other building systems or equipment used in the building by the occupants.
Humidity
No humidification will be provided to the office space during the winter months, and the
resulting winter relative humidity inside the office areas will not be controlled. Office area
relative humidity levels during the winter months could range from 5%to 35%, depending on the
outdoor temperature and humidity.
We have proposed that no humidifiers be used in the server room. The Owner's IT group has
been asked to review this and decide if it is acceptable.
Commissioning
The building will be commissioned by an independent commissioning agent as required by the
LEED certification process. The design team strongly recommends that the Owner also engage
the commissioning agent to perform enhanced commissioning on all mechanical and plumbing
systems.
HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS
General Description
Dedicated heating and cooling source equipment will be located at the Public Safety Building
(PSB). The building may be connected to the existing central plant on the library block at some
point in the future and would receive steam for heating and chilled water for cooling. Ventilation
air will be conditioned by dedicated outdoor air handlers (DOAS). The ventilation air will be
distributed to the spaces using ducts and active chilled beams. Space heating and cooling will be
hydronic via active chilled beams and radiant floors. Cooling towers will operate to directly cool
the air, in-directly cool the air thru coils in the air handlers, and provide condenser water to the
chillers.
The location of the boilers, chillers,pumps, and air handlers is being reviewed with the Owner's
Representatives. Options include a mechanical penthouse on the roof, or a below-grade
mechanical room accessible from the lowest level of parking.
Heating Water
Three condensing boilers are proposed for the project and would be sized to provide a minimum
of 50%total boiler capacity in the event that a single boiler fails. Therefore providing an n+l
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 3
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
redundancy. The heating water system will be designed with primary/secondary piping loops,
provide variable flow,with redundant heating water pumps equipped with variable frequency
drives, a differential pressure sensor to control pump speed, and a combination of modulating
two-way valves and two position valves at terminal devices. The heating system fluid will
contain no glycol.
Schedule 40 black steel pipe and Type L copper tubing are allowed to be used in constructing the
heating water piping system. Black steel pipe 2" and smaller to use threaded joints, 2 %" and
larger to use welded or grooved coupling joints. Copper tubing to use soldered joints.
Chilled Water
The chilled water system will serve the data center,the central air handlers, and the radiant
cooling system. This system will consist of modular centrifugal chillers using R-134 refrigerant,
a pair of redundant chilled water pumps(equipped with variable speed drives) that pump chilled
water in the primary loop,primary and back-up chilled water secondary pumps (equipped with
variable speed drives), and a chilled water tank to increase the chilled water system volume to
the minimum required by the chiller manufacturer.Note that the modular chillers are able to
provide n+1 redundancy without purchasing equipment that increases the chilled plant capacity
by 50%of the peak demand. The chilled water coils inside the air handler will be designed for
chilled water supply and return temperatures of 46°F/58°F with a 12°F chilled water temperature
differential. The chillers will be designed for chilled water supply and return temperatures of
45°F/58°F with a 13°F temperature differential,which provides an additional 1°F of temperature `-"s''
rise to account for piping losses and future fouling of chiller tubes and coil surfaces. This chilled
water system will not contain glycol.
Schedule 40 black steel pipe and Type L copper tubing are allowed to be used in constructing the
chilled water piping system. Black steel pipe 2"and smaller to use threaded joints, 2 '/" and
larger to use welded or grooved coupling joints. Copper tubing to use soldered joints.
Condenser Water
The condenser water system will serve the indirect evaporative cooling coils inside the central air
handlers and the centrifugal chillers located inside the mechanical penthouse. The system will
also serve the radiant cooling system in the building and will act as a water-side economizer for
cooling the data center.
The system will consist of three cooling towers,redundant constant volume condenser water
pumps that pump condenser water throughout the condenser water system, and the condenser
water treatment system. The cooling towers will include basin heaters, and all outdoor
condenser water piping will be heat traced and insulated so the system can operate during the
winter.
Schedule 80 black steel pipe is allowed to be used in constructing the condenser water piping
system. Black steel pipe 2" and smaller is to use threaded joints,while pipes 2 '/"and larger are
to use welded or grooved coupling joints. Auk
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 4
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
Central Air Handler
The central air handler will include outdoor air intake, filter bank(MERV 7 filters), multiple
parallel supply/return fans(total air handler air flow rate anticipated at 40,000 cfin with the fans
selected at 6"WC total static pressure),preheat coils, indirect evaporative cooling coils, chilled
water cooling coils, direct evaporative air washers, and a discharge air plenum. Note that the air
handler is part of the dedicated outdoor air system, and will only move outdoor air to satisfy
ventilation purposes inside the building. This air will also act as motive air for the active chilled
beams located in each occupied space.
Air Distribution
All supply and transfer air ductwork will be constructed with galvanized sheet metal. All
medium pressure ductwork will be constructed to SMACNA 6"pressure class. All low pressure
ductwork will be constructed to SMACNA 2"pressure class. Both types of ductwork will be
sealed to SMACNA seal class A. All medium pressure ductwork will be leak tested.
Supply air will be ducted to active chilled beams. A two-position motorized control damper will
be included in the duct to each active chilled beam, and will be controlled by an occupant sensor
in the space it serves.
Return air and relief air systems are not anticipated at this time.
Outside air intakes for the building will be located on the walls of the penthouse and fan room or
will consist of areaways, depending on where the air handler is located.
Plumbing
The height of the building requires only one pressure zones of domestic water piping: this is a
low pressure zone that operates with the municipal system pressure.
Domestic hot water for the building will be provided by two central storage-type gas-fired hot
water heaters located in the penthouse. These gas-fired water heaters will be supplemented by
solar water heating panels located on the roof of the PSB. Domestic hot water will be stored in
the heaters at 110°F. The storage temperature will be increased to 140°F if showers are included
in the building. It would then mix down to 110°F for distribution through the building. One
domestic hot water circulating pump will keep hot water moving throughout the domestic hot
water lines on all floors,preventing the water inside the hot water pipes from becoming cold
during times of low use.
Lavatory faucets will be equipped with battery operated sensor faucets. Urinals will be equipped
with battery operated sensor flush valves. Water Closets will be equipped with manually
operated dual-flush flush valves equal to the Sloan Upper-Cut. Water use will be reduced by
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 5
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
specifying low-flow faucets, low-flow flush valves, and low-flow shower heads. Waterless
urinals are not being recommended for this project.
No water softeners or other water treatment for the domestic water system is foreseen at this
time.
Drainage from the garage will be routed through a sand-oil separator,then pumped to the
municipal sanitary sewer system in the street.
Dewatering System
A dewatering system will carry ground water away from the lowest level of parking. Water
collected by this system will be pumped to the municipal storm sewer system in the street.
Fire Protection
Fire sprinkler protection will be specified throughout building using a design-build type
specification that describes design criteria. System will comply with NFPA 13 and 14.
Because of the requirement for n+l redundancy and the need for particular building systems to
continue operation after a seismic event,the building will be equipped with a fire pump and
water storage tank. This will enable the fire sprinkler system to remain operational even if the
municipal water supply to the building is broken.
Only some areas of the building will be served by n+1 redundant heating systems. Because of
this,the sprinkler system serving all office and parking areas will be a dry sprinkler system. The
server room, EOC, and dispatch areas will be protected by double-interlock pre-action systems
equipped with VESDA smoke detectors.
A single fire department connection will be required on the facade of the building, and two roof
manifolds will be required.
Although the building is not a high-rise, all floors will be equipped with flow switches and
monitored isolation valves. An express drain system will also be included in one of the
stairwells.
Controls
Provide Direct Digital Control(DDC) system that uses the BACnet or LON protocol, and shall
be installed by Siemens or Utah Yamas Controls.
Discussions will be held with the owner to determine if electrical distribution, lighting,
emergency generators,UPS systems and building power are to be designed with some level of
system monitoring occurring on the DDC system.
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 6
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
Temperature control zone layout will be reviewed with the owner. Typically, corner rooms and
spaces with multiple exposures will have their own temperature control zone. A maximum of
three offices on the same exposure will be grouped together into a single temperature control
zone, with the exception of the staff offices in the core of the building,which may be grouped
together in as many as four offices per zone (refer to SD drawings). Rooms with no exterior
exposure will not be zoned together with rooms on the perimeter of the building. It is not
intended that each room will have its own temperature control zone.
Life Safety
A smoke exhaust system will serve the atrium, as required by chapter 9 of the 2009 IBC. Two
fans will be required, each sized for 150,000 CFM. The fans would be located on the roof of the
building.
Contractor is required to provide the services of a special inspection agency to test and verify
proper operation of the atrium smoke exhaust system and related controls.
Data Center
The data center will be designed with all server racks in a hot aisle/cold aisle configuration, with
hot aisle containment that includes panels and doors at the end of the hot aisles and overhead
plenum walls so each hot aisle is completely isolated from the rest of the room. In-rack cooling
units, similar to those by APC, are being proposed at this time. Other options for cooling
systems in the data center are being reviewed with the Owner at this time. Humidification is not
anticipated in the data center at this time. All chilled water piping inside the data center shall be
installed using welded joints and fittings.
N+l Redundancy
Heating, cooling, ventilation, and fire protection must be provided in designated areas of the
building after a major seismic event. A list of rooms/spaces requiring these redundant services is
being developed with the Owner. Note that the Owner has indicated that redundancy of
domestic water and sanitary sewer systems is not required. The Owner will store bottled water
on-site and provide portable toilets in the event the domestic water supply and sanitary sewer
service to the building are disrupted.
10.05.10 Salt Lake City Public Safety Building 7
Mechanical Criteria Design Narrative
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION -
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5, 2010
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
CODES AND STANDARDS
SITE ELECTRICAL AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
BUILDING POWER SYSTEMS
LIGHTING
FIRE ALARM
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PATHWAYS
SYSTEM COMMISSIONING
SUSTAINABABLE DESIGN -ELECTRICAL
Amok
Criteria Design Page E-1
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS
CODES AND STANDARDS
Codes which are applicable to the design of the electrical systems are listed below. Comply with each of
the latest adopted publications.
ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Code
EIA/TIA, Electronics Industries Association/Telecommunications Industry Association
IBC, International Building Code
IECC, International Energy Code Commission
IESNA, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
NEMA, National Electrical Manufacturers Association
NFPA, National Fire Protection Association(applicable sections including but not limited to):
NFPA 70, National Electrical Code
The Emergency Operations Center and related area and functions of the project
shall comply with the more stringent requirements of NEC Article 708, Critical
Operations Power Systems(COPS)
NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code
NFPA 1221, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services
Communications Systems, 2010 Edition
Salt Lake City's Building Management and Control System Guideline
Standards and Guidelines for Communication Sites(Motorola, Inc.)
UL, Underwriters Laboratories
SITE ELECTRICAL AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Site Electrical Utilities
Existing Conditions: The majority of the block on which the new building will be located is served from an
underground Rocky Mountain Power(RMP)ductbank that comes from 300 East, about mid-block, and
heads east into the block. It turns up onto a power pole where overhead lines branch in the north, east
and south directions. The branch heading south will most likely fall within the footprint of the new building,
and this line shall be removed/relocated. It appears to only feed some site lighting and the two buildings
on the southwest corner of the block that are marked for demolition. The underground line as well as the
overhead lines that branch north and east also appear to fall within the footprint of the new building,
especially in the area of the underground parking garage extending north. These lines will be difficult and
costly to remove/relocate as they serve existing buildings on the block that will remain. The city will need
to get involved directly with the power and telephone utility companies to discuss plans and costs to
relocate these lines. Further study is required to determine exact costs, but a line item allowance should
be included in the cost estimate for this work.
New Service to Public Safety Building: It is desired that the new Public Safety building have redundant
services to feed the building, ideally from separate substations, in a primary-selective arrangement.
Communication and coordination will continue with RMP to this end. It is not known at this time if there
will be additional costs involved from RMP to provide a second service. There are RMP underground
feeders along 300 East, and RMP indicates that there are options for redundant service available. New
conduits will be required from each service point at the property line to the building transformer(s). All
underground distribution work, including the duct banks, pad-mounted transformer and metering
equipment shall be done in accordance with RMP standards, and be submitted to RMP for their approval.
Coordination is still required to obtain net metering for on-site renewable energy under current RMP tariffs
and rate schedules.
Option for Central Plant Connection: An option to receiving service directly from RMP is to feed the new
Public Safety Building from the existing Central Plant on the Library block to the west. The Central Plant is
Page E-2
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5,2010
on 500 South, close to 300 East. Existing 12,470 Volt switchgear in the Plant serves the existing Library,
Leonardo and City and County Buildings. There are spares in the switchgear that could feed the new
building. The disadvantage of this option is the cost of running underground feeders to the new building
and having to purchase and maintain the service transformers. Another disadvantage is the reliability risk
of a single radial feed to the new building that, if interrupted, could be down for a significant time without
long-term backup. Still another option would be to take services from both RMP and the Central Plant to
increase reliability by having feeds from the two sources. Regardless of whether this option is taken or
not, empty conduits should be provided from the new building towards the existing central plant so that a
power feed can be added at a later date.
Telecommunications Utilities
Existing Conditions: Qwest Communications serves existing buildings on the block by using the same
poles and overhead line routes as does RMP for the power lines. It appears that both copper and fiber
services are on the poles serving the buildings. All of the same discussion from the electrical section
above applies to the existing telecommunications lines, in that if the pole and overhead lines that run(from
the central overhead pole)east and north are required to be relocated,then it will be very expensive to
have to provide new telecommunications service into each of the affected buildings that remain. Qwest
has indicated that there will be costs that the Owner will incur, but requires more detail and site meetings
with the Architect and Owner to begin the design and estimation work for this to happen.
New Service to Public Safety Building: Qwest has both copper and fiber lines on the block, and redundant
service is available. Qwest requires a minimum of two 4"conduits to the building(from each service
point), and a minimum separation of 25'if redundant services are used. Other potential
telecommunications providers that have been contacted, and have service in close proximity to the project
site, are listed below. If the Owner desires service(s)from any of these companies, then the Owner will
need to make contact with each to explore the requirements and costs associated with obtaining their
services. Regardless of whether service is taken from any additional provider at this time or not, additional
empty conduits shall be provided from the main telecommunications room to a manhole on the site for
ease of taking service from other providers at a later date.
XO Communications
Integra Telecomm
American Fiber Systems
Comcast Metro Ethernet
BUILDING POWER SYSTEMS
Low Voltage Service and Distribution:
The pad-mounted transformer is designed to be close to the building, in a utility yard on the east side. RMP
requirements are very stringent regarding access and clearances, and shall be strictly adhered to. The
transformer is also planned to be in close proximity to the building generators, and shall have at least 25'
separation from the generators,or alternatively,a"blast"wall can be constructed between the transformer and
generator for shorter distances with RMP approval. The equipment yard may also need to accommodate the
primary-selective high-voltage switch that is desired for the project,and will depend upon the power company's
design for this service.
The secondary service to the building shall be 277/480 volts, 3-phase, 4-wire. Based on preliminary load
calculations, the service shall be sized at 4,000 amps, but this shall be verified with actual equipment and
loads as the design progresses.
Criteria Design Page E-3
A main electrical room is located in the building, near the pad-mounted transformer. The main switchboard
shall be provided with digital metering to monitor all important electrical parameters of the building such as
volts, amps, kVA, demand, power factor and harmonic distortion.This meter shall have the capability to be
remotely monitored from the building management system(BMS),as well as be accessible via a web browser.
The switchboards shall have provisions to add breakers for future load growth. Due to the critical nature of the
facility, it is recommended that at least the main breaker(s)of the facility be draw-out type to allow for quick
maintenance and replacement. The main switchboard shall distribute power to the various branch
panelboards for lighting,outlets and miscellaneous loads. For power quality and sub-metering purposes(for
measurement and verification), separate loads onto different feeders based on load type, such as motors,
lighting and outlets. Another requirement for feeder and load separation will be the different load types based
on life safety and standby needs.
Motor control centers shall be provided for areas where 3 or more motors are grouped. All 3-phase motors
shall be provided with phase-loss protection. Variable frequency drives shall be provided where required for
mechanical equipment and be in compliance with Salt Lake City requirements. The VFD's shall have filters to
isolate the damaging harmonics from the electrical distribution system. The requirement for bypass feature
shall be evaluated carefully with the mechanical design to see if a bypass would offer value for each specific
motor and its application.
New branch panelboards shall be provided in new,vertically stacked electrical rooms. Locate the electrical
rooms centrally as much as possible in order to make new and future circuit runs shorter and less costly.
More than one electrical room per floor shall be used when the branch circuit runs are excessively long
resulting in unacceptable voltage drop. Panelboards serving normal lighting and appliance circuits shall be
located on the same floor as the circuits they serve, making circuit identification and future work more
convenient for the campus. Panelboards serving the 120/208V system shall be provided with insulated
grounding bus bars, in addition to the equipment grounding bus, for equipment that requires an
insulated/isolated grounding conductor. Provide at least 50%spare capacity for future growth and flexibility.
Outlet and lighting branch circuits shall be loaded to no more than 80% of what is allowed by NFPA 70.
Dedicated circuits shall be provided where the load requires. On average,6 outlets per circuit shall be used.
No more than 4 computer terminals per circuit will be allowed. In some cases, fewer outlets shall be on a
circuit as required by the loads.Outlets with dedicated branch circuits(one outlet per circuit)are required for
exercise equipment,vending machines,copy machines,break room counters,refrigerators,dishwashers,AN
cabinets and other locations likely to have equipment requiring dedicated circuits. Each branch circuit
homenan conduit shall have no more than 3 circuits. All 120V multi-wire branch circuits shall have a dedicated
neutral conductor for each circuit per the campus standards.
Conductors shall be all copper and installed in raceways, minimum 0.75" diameter. MC cable is strictly
prohibited. Branch circuits shall be sized to prevent voltage drop exceeding 3%at the farthest load. The total
voltage drop on both feeders and branch circuits shall be designed to not exceed 5%. This will ensure that all
equipment in the building operates most efficiently and minimize power quality problems relating to voltage
drop.
A fault current and coordination study shall be performed by a licensed electrical engineer to indicate available
fault current at all points in the distribution system. New equipment shall be adequately rated for the amount
of available fault current. System coordination shall be studied, and fuses or breakers selected to ensure
minimum system outage due to overloads or fault currents. The breakers shall be set with adjustable long
time,short time, instantaneous and/or ground fault settings for optimum system coordination. Demonstrate
compliance with the NEC regarding selective coordination of overcurrent protective devices serving
emergency systems.
Equipment and Furniture: Power shall be run to any equipment indicated in the program as requiring power
and empty raceway. Obtain equipment cut sheets and shop drawings and incorporate requirements into the
design to ensure that the proper power and conduit is run to the equipment.
Power Quality and Reliability
Page E-4
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5,2010
Transient voltage surge suppression(TVSS)and"noise"protection shall be provided at service equipment and
on branch panelboards that serve sensitive electronic equipment. To the greatest extent possible,TVSS units
shall be integral to the panelboard or switchboard to ensure that lead lengths do not raise the clamping voltage
and negate the use of the TVSS unit. The TVSS shall protect the sensitive electronics from disturbances that
are generated inside or outside of the building.
Provide a lightning protection system per NFPA 780. A system of lightning rods on the roof with down
conductors to a counterpoise ground is proposed. Special attention shall be given to the communications
antennas,dishes and other equipment that is located on the roof and site,so that these items are bounded to
the building lightning protection and grounding system. The system shall have a UL Master Label.
Many power quality problems can be attributed to grounding. Poor grounding can cause equipment failures.
The grounding system shall be installed per NFPA 70 requirements. An insulated equipment grounding
conductor shall be provided in all feeder and branch circuit conduits. Other guidelines shall be followed,such
as IEEE Standard 1100-1999, Power and Grounding Sensitive Electronic Equipment. Communications
antennas and equipment shall be grounded in accordance with Motorola's Standards and Guidelines for
Communication Sites and other equipment manufacturer's standards and guidelines.
Outlets
The program space data sheets shall be used as a guideline for placing outlets,however,adjustments shall be
made to suit the end users' needs during the design and review process with campus personnel. Where
requirements cannot be identified,the following shall be used as a general guideline.
Offices/Workstations: For each workstation, provide one outlet dedicated to computer terminals and one
normal outlet,and one additional normal outlet for every 10'of wall space. In areas designated as"critical",
provide outlets served from both the normal and critical branches of the power system.
Conference Rooms and Meeting Rooms: One outlet for every 10'of wall space,plus one outlet dedicated to
computer terminals on two walls. Include at least one floorbox underneath conference room table for power
and data. Provide outlets as required for audio-visual equipment. In areas designated as"critical", provide
outlets served from both the normal and critical branches of the power system.
Training Rooms and other Instructional Spaces: Provide outlets for instructor's station,audio/visual equipment
and each occupant. Ensure that there is at least one outlet for each 10'of wall space. Provide floor outlets,
poke-throughs or underfloor duct where stations or equipment cannot be served directly from the wall without
crossing aisle space and where no access floor is provided.
Dispatch Rooms: Provide outlets for each dispatch work station and all equipment. Design for flexibility to
add and move workstations and equipment.Ensure that there is at least one outlet for each 10'of wall space
for miscellaneous uses. Provide outlets served from both the normal and critical branches of the power
system.
Control Rooms: Multiple outlets and circuits for all equipment. Provide outlets served from both the normal
and critical branches of the power system.
Commons Areas. Lounges and Waiting Rooms : Provide power outlets for laptop computers for planned
seats, but no less than one outlet per each 12' of wall space. Provide floor outlets where stations or
equipment cannot be served directly from the wall without crossing aisle space.
Auk
Criteria Design Page E-5
Weight and Fitness Rooms: Dedicated outlets for fitness equipment(verify voltage requirements),outlets for
TV monitors,plus convenience outlets every 12'of wall space. Provide a grid of underfloor duct for flexibility in
determining floor outlets locations based on equipment locations.
Breakrooms, Kitchenettes: Outlets on dedicated circuits every 4' on counter top plus dedicated outlets for
refrigerator, microwave, and disposal (switched at counter top), plus one outlet for every 10' of other wall
space in room.
Counter tops(in general): One outlet every 4'; GFI where within 8'of a sink.
Restrooms:One GFI outlet near sink.
Locker/Shower Rooms: One GFI outlet on a dedicated circuit near each grooming counter top.
Main Computer/Server Rooms: Outlets for each equipment rack served from standby and UPS power with
circuit density to allow for 100 VA per square foot.
Telephone/Data Closets: At least 6 quad outlets on standby and UPS power with circuit density to allow
for at least 50 VA per square foot.
Electrical Rooms: At least one outlet on emergency power.
Corridors, Lobbies: Provide at least one outlet every 25',on alternating sides of the corridor or lobby.
Stairs: One outlet at the landing of each level.
Storage Rooms(small), Janitors Closets: One outlet.
Building Exterior: One WP/GFI outlet near each entrance.
EMERGENCY, STANDBY AND UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
Generator System
A generator system consisting of multiple generator sets shall be provided to serve the connected load of the
life-safety systems and critical standby loads and equipment. The generator sets shall be paralleled using
paralleling switchgear. Design a load add/load shed scheme based on priority using either multiple transfer
switches for the various load branches,or electrically operated feeder circuit breakers. In the latter option,the
generator sets shall be paralleled onto the utility bus/switchgear and operate with the utility and tie breaker.
This option requires careful consideration and balance between safety, redundancy, maintainability, and
simplicity. In either scenario,the system shall be design so that when all available generators are running and
on line,the generator system can carry the entire load of the building. If one generator fails or is off line for
maintenance,then the non-critical loads are shed allowing the life safety and critical branches to be served.
The electrical engineer shall present generator options to the owner during design development and discuss
all aspects of the system operation so that a decision can be made appropriate to the level of sophistication
that is desired. The following load branches shall be provide for, in order of greatest priority:
Emergency/Life-Safety
Emergency Exit and Egress Lighting
Fire Alarm Systems
Emergency Communication Systems
Elevators,where part of accessible egress
Smoke Control Systems
Page E-6
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5, 2010
Critical Standby
Emergency Operation Center: power, lighting and air conditioning
Policy Room: power, lighting and air conditioning
Dispatch Centers: power, lighting and air conditioning
Telecommunications Rooms: power, lighting and air conditioning
Security Systems
Building Management Systems
Less Critical
Remainder of building: HVAC, lighting and convenience power
The generators are planned to be located outdoors, east of the building in the equipment yard, and shall be
provided with pre-fabricated walk-in type enclosures with lights, convenience outlets and heating. The
generators shall be diesel fueled,with approximately 72-hours of supply at full load. The generators may have
a base-mounted fuel tank, or served from a common above-ground tank and each have a small 2-hour day
tank. Ensure that the latest EPA regulations are met for exhaust emissions. Based on current load
projections,two generators sized at 1250 kW each will be required.
UPS System
The UPS system shall begin with at least two modules for redundancy, and set up as an"N+1"design,
with capabilities to add one more module for additional capacity. The main service and distribution shall
all be sized and designed so that the additional modules can easily be added to the system without
needing to kill power to the critical equipment. Provide UPS power to all critical electronic equipment
throughout the building that requires uninterruptible power. The preliminary size of the UPS system is two
300 kVA units, paralleled in N+1 configuration.
UPS system shall be static, double conversion, on-line type and have an external maintenance bypass.
Size batteries for approximately 10 minutes at full load. The UPS system and batteries shall be located in
a separate,tempered room maintained at about 77 deg. F.
LIGHTING
General:
The basis for design shall be the IES and its Recommended Practices,such as RP1-93"Office Lighting"and RP-
33-99 "Lighting for Exterior Environments." For exterior lighting, indirect lighting, and other specialized task
lighting,a point-by-point plot of illuminance establishing conformance with the Recommended Practices shall be
furnished. Ballasts shall be 10%THD to minimize system harmonics. The amount of different lamp types shall be
minimized, making replacement and maintenance easier. Lamps shall comply with EPA TCLP requirements.
ASHRAE 90.1 requirements shall be met and exceeded to meet the overall project requirement to beat this
energy code by at least 30%. Energy savings design techniques such as daylighting control,occupancy sensors,
centralized and de-centralized control systems, energy efficient lamps/ballasts shall be used where practical to
maximize energy efficiency. Refer to the Sustainable portion of this narrative for a complete discussion on energy
savings measures to be used.
Parking, Pedestrian,and Street Lighting:
Amok
Criteria Design Page E-7
All exterior lighting fixtures shall be full cut-off to avoid sky glow and light trespass conditions. Control exterior
lighting utilizing combination photocell and time schedule control. Consider LED light sources for energy
conservation. Off-grid pole lights that have integral PV arrays and batteries will be evaluated for possible use in
this project.
Design parking areas to comply with RP-20-98, except that the minimum illuminance shall exceed 1 footcandle
with a 15:1 uniformity. Design pedestrian areas to comply with RP-8(average to minimum uniformity ratio less
than 4 to 1), except that the average horizontal illuminance shall be increased to 1 footcandle and the average
vertical illuminance to 1 footcandle.
Interior Lighting:
Quantitative and qualitative factors must be considered when designing lighting systems for the interior
environments of this facility. Refer to the schedule below, the cited references and to room data sheets for the
desired illuminance levels for each space, and balance this with the requirements for energy conservation.
Important considerations include quality of light,uniformity ratio,glare reduction,color rendering and contrast. To
the greatest extent possible, a task-ambient lighting approach will be used to reduce energy consumption by
reducing the overall ambient lighting level and then using separately switched task lights for work surfaces.
Fluorescent lamps should be considered for use to the greatest extent possible, with the 4' T8 lamp being the
preference based on maintenance and cost. HID sources may be considered where needed to provide the
required illuminance levels in large volume spaces,but the issues of restrike time and the desirability of instant on
need to be addressed. Incandescent sources should be avoided altogether. LED and ceramic metal halide
sources will be considered for task illumination, art and accent lighting.
For offices,training rooms and meeting rooms,pendant indirect lighting should be strongly considered,but must
be carefully coordinated in rooms with projectors so that the fixtures will not interfere with the projected image.
Select luminaires for areas where VDTs are planned which are designed to minimize veiling reflections, and
provide multilevel lighting control and task lighting to reduce the illuminance on the VDT. In addition,in rooms with
audio visual,design lighting with variable or switched levels as indicated with a separate controlled zone to reduce
glare and illuminance on the audio visual display. In rooms with projectors, provide a separate bank of lighting
control switches or station near the instructor position for ease of controlling lighting during presentations.
For spaces where glare control is not required,fluorescent, lay-in fixtures may be used. This includes corridors,
workrooms,restrooms,common areas,equipment rooms and storage rooms. Recessed fluorescent downlights
shall be used in areas where aesthetics call for an upgraded appearance, such as in main lobbies.
All interior lighting shall be controlled by some automatic means. This shall include occupancy sensors for smaller
enclosed areas and relay control with clock and/or timer supervision for larger areas. Consider occupancy sensors
in zones for large open office areas. Manual on/off switches shall be provided for each user with a work station,in
addition to the automatic means of control. Uniformity must be maintained when in reduced lighting modes.
Provide dual-level switching where practical to allow users to reduce light in a uniform manner. The corridors and
common areas shall be controlled through the building management system with local wall switch override.
Wherever natural daylight is provided,incorporate daylighting controls to promote energy savings by using artificial
lighting only as needed. This can be accomplished with automatic dimming, stepped switching or simple on/off
control depending on the functional needs of the space.All lighting shall be"instant on"to facilitate quick response
to demand and power interruptions.
Exit and emergency lighting shall comply with the IBC. Emergency lighting for means of egress to 1 fc average,
0.3 fc minimum, shall be provided. The emergency lighting shall be shut off during non-business hours to avoid
energy waste from 24-hour bum time. Minimal "night-lights"could be considered as way-finding. Emergency
lighting shall be included in restrooms,electrical rooms, and communication rooms.
Lighting Summary:
TYPICAL AREA ILLUMINANCE COMMENTS
IN
FOOTCANDLES
Offices 30/50 Task/ambient,
Training Rooms 10-50 Variable, multi-zoned
Page E-8
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5, 2010
TYPICAL AREA ILLUMINANCE COMMENTS
IN
FOOTCANDLES
Conference Rooms 10-50 Variable, multi-zoned
Emergency Operation Center 30/50 Task/ambient,
Dispatch Centers 30/50 Task/ambient,
Kitchenette.Break Rooms 30 UC lighting
Fitness/Weight Rooms 30 Indirect
Libraries 50 Good vertical and horizontal
illumination
Lobby 30 Daylight Responsive if possible
Locker Rooms 40
Corridors 15
Restrooms 30 UT Health Dept Code
FIRE ALARM
Provide a fire alarm and detection system in compliance with NFPA, IFC,federal,state and local codes. Design
an addressable,Class A system capable of reporting back to a central station. The fire alarm system will include,
but not be limited to,manual fire alarms,automatic smoke detection,audible/visible alarm notification appliances,
and required control equipment. Smoke detection in main server rooms and other critical equipment rooms shall
be accomplished by means of an early-warning or"VESDA"type air sampling system. Strobes shall be visible
from all locations except private offices and coordinate with equipment that may hinder visibility. Provide duct
detectors and fan shutdown where required by NFPA and the IMC. The detailed fire alarm system design will
evaluate electrical distribution zoning and incorporate automatic de-energization of equipment in affected area of
smoke detector alarm. Coordinate location of the building annunciator with the fire marshal. All other detectors
and functions shall comply with the referenced codes and standards. All fire alarm wiring shall be in metal conduit.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PATHWAYS
General
Provide pathways for all telephone, data, radio and communications cabling. Coordinate all design with the
voice/data cabling installer,the communications equipment manufacturers and the Owner.
Site Service
Provide new(6)4"duct banks form two separate manholes into the building's main telecommunications room.
Refer to the Site Telecommunications portion of the program.
Riser Distribution
Stacked telecommunications closets shall be provided to serve each floor of the building. Coordinate size,
equipment layout and wall space with all communications, security, audio/visual and other equipment that will
be housed in these rooms. Closets shall be located such that when cabling is routed through the raceway ogok
system provided, the distance will not exceed 290 feet to the furthest outlet. Provide a minimum of four 4"
Criteria Design Page E-9
conduits from the MDF to the stacked IDF locations and four 4"sleeves between floors. If possible, stack the
MDF below the IDFs. Provide both normal and emergency circuits to each IDF, 3 each, with one fourplex per
circuit. Twenty-four hour HVAC is required in each closet and shall be supplied with emergency power.
Horizontal Distribution
Provide a cable tray distribution network throughout each floor and into the IDF and communications closets.
Extend the cable tray around inside of the IDF closet to allow cables to be routed within the room. Consider
ease of access to the tray system when the building is in full operation. Limit cable tray routing to be above
corridors, common and similar areas. Where ceilings are exposed or inaccessible,then provide a bridge of
equivalent conduit connecting the cable trays in the accessible ceiling areas. Do not load the cable tray and
raceway system to more than 50%of what is allowed by cable fill requirements of NFPA 70.
Voice/Data Drops
Each voice/data outlet location, or"drop", shall consist of a 4"square box with mud ring and one 1"
conduit stubbed to the nearest cable tray. Locations will be coordinated with the users during design. As
a minimum, provide one voice/data drop for each workstation,fax machine, copy machine,desk, computer
terminal and teaching station. Within each drop may be installed up to(4)cables for voice and data per
location. Where wireless networks are being considered for student access, still allow sufficient empty
raceways for future hardwired connections should the wireless system have insufficient bandwidth for
evolving applications.
Other Empty Conduit Systems
Provide empty conduit and boxes for other low-voltage signal and communications wiring systems that
may be provided in this or other contracts, such as audio/visual systems.
SUSTAINABLE DESIGN -ELECTRICAL
General
Achieving "Net Zero" through sustainable design is a primary goal of this project, and will also be under
consideration for LEEDTM' Certification. The following general areas are being considered in the electrical
design in order to meet sustainable design criteria of this project. They are categorized following the LEED-
NC rating system.
SS Credit 8: Light Pollution Reduction: In order to reduce light pollution and maintain a dark-sky friendly site,
exterior lighting for walkways,parking lots and roadways will direct the illumination downward using full cut-off
luminaires. Any facade lighting that is desired should be accomplished without lighting upward(from bottom
up), but rather lighting from top down. All exterior up-light should be strictly avoided. Interior lighting that
spills through perimeter windows will also be aimed downward. Interior light fixtures that cause direct glare to
the outside during the night will be shut off with a time clock after business hours. Lighting levels and lighting
power densities will not exceed the values listed for exterior areas in the ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007,
Exterior Lighting Section.
EA Credit 1: Optimize Energy Performance: The lighting power density for the project is planned to be at
least 30% better than the requirements listed in ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007. The most energy
efficient lamp and ballast combinations that are feasible for the project will be used. Consideration for lamp
maintenance and replacement will be given by keeping the number of different lamp types to a minimum,and
not specifying exotic lamps that are expensive and difficult to find. A variety of lighting control methods and
lighting power reduction techniques will be considered, based on type and use of each space, including the
following:
1. Corridors and Common Areas: A networked lighting relay control system will be provided that
controls lights based on time of day occupancy. The relay control system can also accept a variety of
inputs, including signals from photocells, occupancy sensors, and wall switches. For after hours,
override switches may be used that turn lights on for no longer than one hour at a time.
2. Enclosed Spaces(offices, conference rooms, equipment rooms, etc.): Occupancy sensors will be
provided for each of these spaces,with a manual on-off wall switch. When someone is in the room,
the wall switch is enabled and the occupancy can control the lights on or off.With nobody in the room,
Page E-10
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH Oct. 5,2010
the lights are always off. These same occupancy sensors can also be connected to the building
management system to establish occupancy for the HVAC system. Rooms that are not occupied can
be placed in a"set back"mode to save energy until the room is occupied.
3. Daylighting Areas (also part of IEQ Credit 8.1, Daylight and Views - Daylight): For corridors and
common areas with daylighting, indoor photocells will be provided to turn on/off the artificial
illumination in the area, or to provide stepped switching based on the amount of natural daylighting
available. For interior spaces that are normally occupied(such as offices and conference rooms),
dimmable fixtures may be used along with photocells that can provide an analog signal to the
dimmed fixture and automatically supplement the amount daylight in the room through smooth,
continuous dimming. Therefore the occupant(s) of the room does not notice abrupt changes in
lighting levels due to the daylighting controls.
4. Exterior Areas: Exterior lighting will be controlled through a photocell and timeclock combination. At
least two zones of lighting will be provided:one zone that shuts off after business hours,and another
zone that stays on all night to maintain a minimal level of security lighting throughout the dark night
hours.
5. Task/Ambient Lighting: Energy consumption can be greatly reduced by reducing the ambient lighting
in a room and providing additional,separately controlled lighting for individual tasks. For office areas,
the overhead ambient lighting will be reduced to a lighting level of between 20 footcandles(FC)to 30
FC. Then furniture task lighting will be planned so that the room occupants can have focuses lighting
on the task,to raise the lighting level to around 50 FC that is required for reading.
6. Establish a lighting power density goal of 0.7 watts/sf or less. Do not use any incandescent lighting.
Use only fluorescent, LED or ceramic metal halide.
7. Replace computers with thin-client(preferred),net book,or laptop computers using LED displays with
shut-down controls. � •
8. Use occupancy sensor-power strips to shut down personal power use when not in use.
9. Disallow personal space heaters, microwave ovens, refrigerators,and fans.
10. Establish energy efficiency standards for all plug loads using Energy Star equipment and appliances.
Work closely with Owner and user groups to purchase low-energy consumption equipment,such as:
a. 35 watt TEC laptop computers to replace higher wattage desk top computers.
b. 25 watt LED monitors to replace higher wattage LCD monitors.
c. 2 watt VOIP phones to replace standard phones.
d. Smart power strips with automatic shut off when space is unoccupied.
e. Energy-Star copy machines and printers;consolidate into multi-function devices as opposted
to single-function devices. Eliminate personal copy machines and printers.
f. Energy-star refrigerators and break-room equipment.
g. Eliminate drinking fountain water cooler.
h. Vending Machines: de-lamp and select most efficient available.
i. LED video displays instead of LCD TV's.
11. Use energy efficient servers with virtual-server software(if possible).
12. Add wireless dataloggers to every work station,light switch,fans,and other major energy user to see
where high energy use is.
13. For main server and communications rooms:
a. Use evaporative cooling in lieu of chilled water cooling.
b. Or, consider liquid-submersed cooling system for server racks.
c. Consider DC distribution to save energy from AC-DC transformation.
d. Use UPS systems that normally operate in bypass mode, then transfer to inverter/battery
when utility fails.
e. Use premium-efficiency transformers.
EA Credit 2: Onsite Renewable Energy: Onsite energy production through photovoltaics (PV) will be
maximized for use on this project. PV systems are typically best suited to be placed on the roofs of new
structures, however, ground-mounted PV arrays will also be considered for the site and through creative
Criteria Design Page E-11
collaboration with the Architect, can even be used as shading structures or displays that tell a story of the
owner's commitment to sustainability. There are other options for PV system applications,such as building-
integrated PV modules that can be part of the building's window system. Any ideas for PV systems will be
developed as the building design progresses, and presented to the Owner along with costs and payback
analysis for consideration and decisions.
EA Credit 3: Enhanced Commissioning: As part of the LEED Rating System, commissioning will be an
integral process of the design and construction. We plan to fully participate with the Commissioning Agent
during design, and specify that the electrical systems installers are part of the commissioning. As a
minimum,the following systems shall be included in the commissioning process:
Medium voltage equipment(transformers, switches, cables)
Main switchgear
Lighting Control Devices and Systems
Generators and Transfer Switches
UPS Systems
Motor Controllers
Variable Frequency Controllers
Fire Alarm Systems
Security Systems
EA Credit 5: Measurement and Verification: The building will have a main electrical meter by the utility,but to
achieve this credit,additional metering is required throughout the building. Meters for various subsystems will
be provided, such as lighting and HVAC loads. This will allow the building owner to monitor the amount of
energy used on each specific system,and to make adjustments in the operation if the energy used exceeds
the expected amounts. We will work together with the mechanical engineer and coordinate meter locations
consistent with the measurement and verification plan. Metering should be the networked, digital type to
allow for easy accumulation of data via a web site or centralized location. A central display can be added in
the main lobby to show the energy use of the building, and energy production of solar power(if used).
EA Credit 6: Green Power: Based on the building energy model, alternatives will be studied to provide at
least 35% of the building's electrical energy through grid-source, renewable technologies such as power
derived from wind or biomass energy. This may be obtained from programs offered by the local utility, or
through the purchase of renewable energy certificates(RECs)from companies that comply with the technical
requirements of the Green-e Energy program.
IEO Credit 6.1: Controllability of Lighting: Lighting controls will be maximized by ensuring that at least 90%of
the occupants have individual controllability of lighting in their respective work areas. Where open office
furniture is used,then separately switched task lighting mounted in the systems furniture is the best approach.
Since the systems furniture will most likely be purchased directly by the Owner(and not part of the design
documents),it will be very important that the Owner purchase systems furniture with integral,switchable task
lighting. As discussed above in the Optimize Energy section, the overhead ambient lighting can then be
reduced to save a significant amount of energy. For shared multi-occupant spaces(such as meeting rooms,
training rooms and similar spaces)variable lighting controls will be provided to allow flexible adjustments that
meet the group needs and preferences.
Page E-12
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5,2010 .,
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS
CODES AND STANDARDS
STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEMS
SECURITY SYSTEMS
AUDIO AND VIDEO SYSTEMS
Page T-1
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5,2010
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS
TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS CODES AND STANDARDS
Codes which are applicable to the design of the technology systems are listed below. Comply with each
of the latest adopted publications. They are part of this program by reference and are not restated in the
design narrative.
BICSI, Building Industry Consulting Services International
ANSI/TIA/EIA,American National Standards Institute/Telecommunications Industry
Association/Electronics Industries Association
IBC, International Building Code
NFPA, National Fire Protection Association(applicable sections including but not limited to):
NFPA 70, National Electrical Code
UL, Underwriter's Laboratories
IEEE Compliance: Comply with applicable requirements of IEEE 208
ADA,Americans with Disabilities Act
Standard Broadcast Wiring and Installation Practices", as excerpted from "Recommended Wiring
Practices,"Sound System Engineering,(2nd Edition), D. Davis
STRUCTURED CABLING SYSTEMS
Site Telecommunications
Telecommunications cabling is distributed throughout the campus. Distribution shall include both loose
tube fiber optic cabling and multi-pair UTP Category 3 outside plant rated cabling. All outside plant cable
quantities are to be determined. Refer to Telecommunications Raceways listed in the Electrical Systems
section.
Entrance Facilities and Main Equipment Rooms
Entrance Facility shall have hybrid single/multi mode fiber and category 3 UTP multi pair cable between
the building POP(point of presence)and the main equipment room (MC). Additional equipment rooms
(ER)are to be provided as required by individual departments. Each ER shall have hybrid single/multi
mode fiber and category 3 multi pair cable from the MC. All fiber optic cable strand and UTP pair counts
will be determined.
General Structured Cabling Systems
Voice-data cabling(structured cabling systems)will include 4 pair Category 6 station cabling, multi-pair
copper(UTP)and fiber backbones, all terminations,wall plates,fiber termination panels, copper patch
cables, 110 type IDC punch down blocks, racks and wire management. The installer of the voice and
data cabling system will be have on staff a BICSI certified RCDD and all onsite installers shall be BICSI
Level II certified. In addition the installer shall provide a warranty for the complete installation through the
installed connectivity/cable manufacturer warranty program. Every strand of fiber and every conductor of
copper will be tested in full compliance with the current ANSI/TIA/EIA 568.0 standards. All fiber will be
tested at all applicable window for single and multi mode cables. All test results will be documented on 8
1/"x 11"papers and electronically in an owner identified software format for every conductor of copper
and fiber cable.
Page T-2
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5,2010
Backbone and Horizontal Cable
From the main equipment room(MC), provide a copper backbone of multi pair category 3 UTP copper,
plenum rated cable for voice, and a combination of multimode and single mode fiber cabling for data to
each termination room(TR)on each of the floors for voice and data signal distribution. Provide UTP riser
pair and fiber strand counts as required by owner. All fiber will be terminated into separate fiber
termination panels(FTP)at each end with SC connectors. Install all fiber cable inside of plenum rated
innerduct. Rack mount all cable termination equipment inside open frame 2 post racks. Provide the EF,
MC,all ER's, and all TR's with'/."plywood painted with fire retardant paint on a minimum of two walls.
Locate entrance facility cables on 110 type punch down blocks for termination on plywood walls. Locate
all riser multi-pair UTP cables on rack mounted 110 type punch down blocks. Locate FTP's for termination
of all fiber cable, and all patch panels for termination of all horizontal copper cable in 7', 19"2-post open
frame equipment racks. Provide cable runway(ladder rack)around the entire perimeter of all rooms at 7'
6"above the finished floor,with lateral runs extending from wall to wall over the top of all equipment racks.
Provide 7'high, 6"wide, dual sided vertical wire managers every equipment rack, and horizontal wire
managers at the top and bottom of each equipment rack,as well as between all equipment and patch
panels in equipment racks. Design a minimum of two rack-mounted, 6-outlet TVSS power strips in
designated switch/electronics equipment racks.
Horizontal Cabling
Horizontal cabling will be provided from each voice-data outlet to the nearest TR on the same building
level. All horizontal cable specified for workstation connections, both voice and data,will be Category 6
UTP plenum rated cable and will be terminated to category 6 compliant RJ-45(8 pin)patch panels and
faceplate modules.
Wireless Network ''" ^
Non-classified non-secure building areas, and immediately adjacent outdoor areas, shall be provided with
reliable wireless local area network coverage. Provide data outlets at owner designated locations for
wireless access points to cover all interior areas as well as to spill-out into all immediately adjacent
outdoor areas. Wireless access point data outlets shall consist of 2 Category 6 data jacks mounted on a
double gang wall plate.
Telephone Outlet
Design telephone outlets for pay phones, elevator panels,wall phones and other required uses. Install 4
pair Category 6 cable in a suitable wall plate for the application.
Voice and Data System Active Electronics and Passive Devices
All active voice and data system electronics including, but not limited to, hubs, routers, servers, PBX's,
etc...will be provided from a separate building FF&E budget and are not part of the construction budget.
All passive devices including, but not limited to cabling, termination devices,wall plates, patch panels,
copper patch cables,fiber patch cords,connectors,open frame equipment racks, cable runway, and cable
management systems are part of the construction budget.
SECURITY SYSTEMS
Security systems shall be comprised of three main elements—intrusion detection and duress alarm,
access control(card readers), and video surveillance. These three elements shall be integrated to
Page T-3
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5, 2010
perform as a single enterprise command and control system,with separate partitions, monitor and control
capabilities, and recording at various"satellite"locations to be determined during the design process.
Intrusion Detection/Duress
The planned facilities will be a mixture of 24/7 occupied spaces and regular business hours which will be
monitored using zone partitions. Areas can be"secured"while other spaces remain"alarm-free". Door
contact indicators and motion detectors will be the main sensing devices. Duress buttons will be provided
at all public interface locations.
Access Control
Electronic access control of doors using proximity type card readers shall be provided. Base system
compatibility shall be determined the Salt Lake City standards. Access control system alarms(forced
doors or propped open)shall be integrated into the alarm monitoring system and annunciation. Regular
authorized usage of cards shall be executed in the"background"of the system, not burdening monitoring
officers with regular traffic.
Video Surveillance
Unless otherwise noted, an IP camera system will be implemented. A mixture of megapixel and standard
high resolution digital cameras, both fixed and pan-tilt-zoom,will be installed at all public entrances and
exits,waiting areas, reception and public counters, elevator lobbies, stairwells and all "emergency exit
only"doors. In addition, cameras shall be located viewing all duress button locations and/or designated
sensitive or critical access control locations. Megapixel cameras are to be installed at all high traffic
locations and areas where subsequent video forensics may want to be used(license plate reads,facial
recognition, high definition zooms,etc. Standard high resolution cameras will be used where general
viewing and monitoring of staff or low traffic areas is desired. All cameras are always active and subject to
24/7 recording based on current video diagnostic programming(motion sensed,time/calendar, masked,
behavioral,etc.). Surveillance system is to be fully integrated with duress and access control systems to
provide immediate video image call-ups for all alarms.
Security System Control
All alarm functions, selections of cameras, door and elevator control, and general monitoring of all inputs
and outputs of the three main elements shall be integrated together on a single GUI screen with touch and
mouse click control. Officers will be monitoring events, not a wall of monitors, as the"systems"detect and
automatically"call up'alarms images for their immediate response.
AUDIO AND VIDEO SYSTEMS
General
Audio and video systems will be specified for installation as part of the building construction work,to be
completed with all building trades. Audio and video systems will be specified for full compliance with the
Program Report standards.All video system displays will be planned for low energy consumption utilizing
LED and other emerging technologies. Displays will be RoHS compliant,will have built-in eco-power
consumption modes, and will be created with no consumables.
Standard Conference Rooms
Page T-4
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5, 2010
Standard conference rooms will be equipped with an audio system for media audio reproduction only.
Capability for voice reinforcement will not be provided. Speaker systems will be designed to provide even
sound pressure level throughout the entire seating area with+2 dB at 2 KHz, and a frequency response of
at Ieast150 Hz to 15 KHz+2 dB, and a maximum of 12%articulation loss of consonants. Audio systems
will be equipped with an audio output for connection of a portable assisted listening system.
A video system will be provided for large screen display of meeting subject matter.A single large screen
front projection system will be specified for each room. Projection screens will be sized using industry
standard formulas appropriate for the nearest and furthest viewers. Projection screens will be located in
close coordination with seating layouts to assure appropriate viewing sight lines.
Projection systems will be specified in a 16:9 format,with a minimum native resolution of 1080p. As with
image sizing, industry standard formulas will be used to calculate the required light output for each
projector to assure that images will not be"washed out" by ambient room lighting.
The conference room table will also be wired with analog and digital computer video inputs,along with
their associated audio signals. This connectivity will be provided in"hidden"connection panels with
integrated patch cords. Basic source devices including a Bluray DVD player and digital television tuner
will also be provided.
Conference rooms will be equipped with an integrated control panel for control of all audio and video
system components, lighting systems, and motorized window coverings(if applicable). To meet this need,
a touch screen control panel will be provided. The touch screen control panel will be programmed in full
compliance with the end user's desired button layout, configuration, and labeling. In addition, macros
(multiple events)will occur when a button on the touch panel is engaged.
Standard Conference Rooms with Integrated Teleconferencing
Standard conference rooms with integrated teleconferencing will comply with all requirements identified
above. In addition, audio systems will be integrated with telephone systems for teleconferencing
capability. Conference room tables will be wired with microphones for the capture of meeting participant
audio. Meeting participants via telephone will be heard over the room speaker system. Please note that
this capability does not include video conferencing.
Video Conference Rooms
Video conference rooms will be equipped with an audio system for teleconferencing, video conferencing,
and media source device presentation. Conference room tables will be wired with microphones for the
capture of meeting participant audio. Speaker systems will be designed to provide even sound pressure
level throughout the entire seating area with+2 dB at 2 KHz,and a frequency response of at Ieast150 Hz
to 15 KHz+2 dB, and a maximum of 12%articulation loss of consonants. A wireless assisted listening
system will be provided for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
A video system will be provided for large screen display of meeting subject matter and video conferences.
Multiple large screen images will be provided using rear projection screens and/or large screen flat panel
monitors,or a combination of both. Projection screens will be sized using industry standard formulas
appropriate for the nearest and furthest viewers. Display devices will be located in close coordination with
seating layouts to assure appropriate viewing sight lines.
Displays will be specified in a 16:9 format,with a minimum native resolution of 1080p. As with image
sizing, industry standard formulas will be used to calculate the required light output for each projector to
assure that images will not be"washed out"by ambient room lighting. Pan,tilt, zoom cameras will be
provided for image capture of video conferencing participants.
The conference room table will also be wired with analog and digital computer video inputs, along with
Page T-5
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5,2010
their associated audio signals. This connectivity will be provided in"hidden"connection panels with
integrated patch cords. Basic source devices including a Bluray DVD player and digital television tuner
will also be provided.
Conference rooms will be equipped with an integrated control panel for control of all audio and video
system components, lighting systems, and motorized window coverings(if applicable). To meet this need,
a touch screen control panel will be provided. The touch screen control panel will be programmed in full
compliance with the end user's desired button layout,configuration, and labeling. In addition, macros
(multiple events)will occur when a button on the touch panel is engaged.
Training Rooms
Training rooms will be equipped with an audio system for presenter voice reinforcement, and media
source reinforcement. Speaker systems will be designed to provide even sound pressure level throughout
the entire seating area with +2 dB at 2 KHz, and a frequency response of at Ieast150 Hz to 15 KHz+2
dB, and a maximum of 12%articulation loss of consonants. A wireless assisted listening system will be
provided for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Training rooms will be provided with a technology enabled lectern. Several media source devices will be
provided and housed at each lectern. These devices will include, but not be limited to, one permanent
computer, inputs for portable computers, a Bluray DVD player, and a document camera. Audio originating
from these source devices will be selected, processed, and amplified to the speaker system. The ability to
annotate(write electronically)on displayed images will also be provided.
A video system will be provided for large screen display of training subject matter.A single large screen
front projection system will be specified for each room. Projection screens will be sized using industry
standard formulas appropriate for the nearest and furthest viewers. Projection screens will be located in
close coordination with seating layouts to assure appropriate viewing sight lines.
Projection systems will be specified in a 16:9 format,with a minimum native resolution of 1080p. As with
image sizing, industry standard formulas will be used to calculate the required light output for each
projector to assure that images will not be"washed out"by ambient room lighting.
Training rooms will be equipped with an integrated control panel for control of all audio and video system
components, lighting systems, and motorized window coverings(if applicable). To meet this need, a touch
screen control panel will be provided. The touch screen control panel will be programmed in full
compliance with the end user's desired button layout, configuration, and labeling. In addition, macros
(multiple events)will occur when a button on the touch panel is engaged.
Training Rooms-Divisible
Each section of the divisible training room will be equipped with AV systems as described above. In
addition, infrared sensors will be provided to monitor the position of the folding partition. When open, the
two AV systems will operate as a single, larger system. When closed,the two AV systems will operate
independently.
Operations Control/Dispatch
Multiple large screen displays will be provided in operations control/dispatch. Displays will be specified in
a 16:9 format,with a minimum native resolution of 1080p. Displays may be self-contained rear projection
systems(cubes), or large format flat panel monitors as determined during the design process. Multiple
displays will be located immediately adjacent in a pattern and quantity to be determined during the design
process. Displays will be edge matched, and bezel frames minimized to reduce space between displays
Page T-6
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5, 2010
to an absolute minimum.
Video signals will be controlled to the displays using a video wall control processor. The processor will
allow multiple small images to be shown on a single display, or one large image to be shown across all
displays,or multiple combinations of large and small images. Video signals will be routed to the wall
processor using a large format, high resolution video matrix switcher. Video signal sources will include,
but not be limited to: operations center computers, surveillance cameras, and television stations.
An audio system will be provided for reinforcement of media source devices. Speaker systems will be
designed to provide even sound pressure level throughout the entire seating area with+2 dB at 2 KHz,
and a frequency response of at Ieast150 Hz to 15 KHz+2 dB, and a maximum of 12%articulation loss of
consonants. A multi-channel infrared transmission system will also be provided for private listening to
selected media sources.
Control of the video routing system,video wall control processor, and audio system will be achieved using
an integrated control system. User interface will occur using PC based control screens accessible from
networked computers, and using a resident touch panel.
Interview Rooms
Interview rooms will be provided for private interviews of children,witnesses, and suspects. Discrete
audio and video microphones and cameras will be located to capture interview room proceedings.
Cameras and microphones will feed remotely located hard disk recorders. Live audio and video feeds will
be provided to observation rooms, Lieutenant office, and Sergeant office.
TV Distribution System
An RF TV distribution system will be provided for distribution of audio and video signals throughout the
building. The TV distribution system will be provided with cable, amplifiers, splitters, directional couplers,
terminators, outlets, and connectors. The system will be the broadband type, for distribution of modulated
audio and video signals onto a carrier frequency. A minimum 750 MHz bandwidth will be specified, and all
outlets will be provided with between+5 and+10 dBu at each building television outlet.
TV outlets will be provided to all rooms with AV systems, break rooms,fitness rooms, and all Chief/Deputy
Chief offices. Television monitors will be provided in fitness rooms and all Chief/Deputy Chief offices. The
television monitors in the Chief/Deputy Chief offices will also be provided with a wall mounted computer video
input jack to accommodate the display of computer video signals originating from within the office.
ANTENNA INFRASTRUCTURE
Provision for cable pathways, mounting structures, and space for equipment racks shall be required to
facilitate the installation of several antenna systems, including but not limited to microwave dishes (both
satellite uplink and terrestrial"line-of-sight"),800 MHz RF antenna arrays,GPS acquisition antenna systems
("puck'type disc transponders), and a wave platform(similar to cell radio antenna systems).
Strategies for antenna system array placement and mounting involve a significant tower arrangement,either
ground and/or roof mounted. Impact on tower height and structural size can be reduced by separating the
installation of the microwave dishes from the traditional RF"stick"vertical antenna arrays. Both satellite uplink
(45 degree elevation from horizontal)and"line-of sight"terrestrial dishes(aimed at horizon,typically 0 to 10
degrees)could be roof mounted to building structural elements and screened from view.
00104904
Page T-7
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH October 5, 2010
Expected antenna systems are as follows:
Simulcast 800 Mhz Repeater System(20 Channel). Two sets of antenna arrays,RX(Receive)and
TX (Transmit) are required and with physical vertical separation.The RX array will require a TTA
(Tower top amplifier)and antenna with capacity for 2 each inch Heliax cables with horizontal and
vertical cable management support. RX antenna lengths are approximately 9 feet long. The TX array
will require capacity for a minimum of 4 each 7/8 inch Heliax cables and four actual antennae,with
similar support,and vertically spaced from the RX antennae. TX antenna lengths are approximately
12 feet long. Space for 4 full size floor standing racks will be needed in the communications room
interior to the building.
Terrestrial"Line-of-Sight"Microwave Dishes. Four foot(1.2 meter)diameter with clear views of NW
and SW quadrants. "Cable" requirements will use"elliptical waveguides"with stringent installation
guidelines and support (straight, few and wide sweeping bends, etc.) Provide for three separate
locations.
Satellite Uplink Dish. One required for backup telecommunications(phones).Six foot in diameter will
require 1 each half inch coaxial cable type. Will look up at 45 degrees and if sufficiently placed back
from the edge can be hid by screens, etc.
UASI Support Antenna System. Standard coaxial cable to 4 separate "puck type disc"
transponders, approximately 6"X 4",with clear view of the sky.
Clock/Sync Transponders. Similar disc type transponders with clear view of sky and needing 1
each RG-8 type coaxial cable each.
Wave Platform. Similar to cell radio antenna arrays. Expected to have a minimum of 16 mobile
transmitting antennae plus one for UHF and one for VHF radio (amateur band) transmissions.
Coaxial cable type feeds.
Provisions for both power and signal is anticipated. There will be a significant number of cables all
combined with the majority, if not all,originating from the same communications space interior to the
building. Means of installation, access for maintenance and security are all to be considered in
providing a substantial pathway to the ground and or the roof.
Page T-8
E 400 South Street
i i" '� h Ci existing
�..% building
C i
,,'north entry to
ti u _,. underground parking garage
IV ^)
surface ;; w
parking 'r �,yexisting street trees
-j � existing building •j '
i rj
L + l .i
• - /green roof
existing trees i y%; * " a? 82
w
proposed trees tie street connection F ' o0
co
a3 co
t .
f 2 =1,
. ` New Public
��' ._ i t✓w° / AA = w Safety Building -" -xtension of Blair Street
%r •
' ,� j existing trees to remain u
J1 - •'tf�•
"' � I , t r ''ice area
^-e green lawn terraces > 4
y ; �' �- street trees
. ; , . 1 green planted terraces
/ jj ,----- ---- r ,
--
street tree E 500 South Street south entry to C I V I T A S t G S B S ,,
underground parking garage
P a•iss.. ..,Iimmn ..EN _...,
...._ ...._________T
\ .....,__ Ts-mv ___ r_41,. ___ __=._
. ..,...... ..t_._ __......,... .......
..... , ..„. ,
.....0.7...=---.•3sIMINI
r ���' �_ If
'3S'�.:� ,.,' �a w�nr�l y Mt iii� 77,,E 11";"6& CIAO aQ�a o •.� . . •
1.
m���� . iris..... �, .i'le a�.= .11C fi,Mit Mafia R—Iiss 'I i i -_ — __ '
View from Library Square looking east I C I V I TA S ►1/'�- G S BS ad
101
all
v)
co
/////
•..•• ..
':.r_.• , DOA
•1. •.. "' , 1
/ 4 ./... .' .
A 1 ;• 'z,,, .:, : . , t
—
• V, ,.Y:•.• ,,>•.,1410, ‘
a)
0>
•40 ;: ',.1
r',1'41 •
;..-1,4 ' ,, ' ' •
/
' 'se Ass.' ' • iT.-3k.. .
ilr• ,:Mk. . 7,•••1.II ,..
E
.4•••
, '',41' ii I.• .
I N.,
J. ,.4.
iff ,,,
i* 41;1, /,,,, /,li'7;',11- A0
i :/#1,'4„/7 •f 4 ::_i ,,4:Siv,, , 1
411,.qi ft , : -- ii, 44-fir
I',17/7 # 1
,r , f 17 A•Af „ . , A.
1; If
(
/ qr
/ vtt 1 ipt',it irlIW '11,1 h f/rP.
‘0•11( ......%
............... —
.• ••........
1Vvec,L4D4 4"4• ul
t 'IN1' Vk4t1:.'" 41,414ri,
Illkil
r •''ti''•,
'*IP • 46:::*..........:::::..':....:.......................!....:...: ' . r'..',. , 144.,(9(1144t1)
r .; .. ..
/ i 4.14,
.‘1, h ir7a,
lk4,154•4,it,, i';'. s',‘, ‘%''Vs‘ \ ' l'.,
'4X,,,•..4 II '''':'17, . ''''''',, ki,N N.,\' '\,,,,A1-•
_ ...-
... - ....----
_..—
...
S\
r,
,,'5':
\ ,,,,,,- •,,,,, ,, „'..04,1,-,4,:,,,-, 1.7i 'of s' ''''' '
)„, ': # jf441.0''.;, lif"..,•,' . , ;,-, _,f4.14";i:',*4-?.z-,sr' Arelt..4 % !,.;;', .
s r
)
• .. . .,,,le ; ''-}sri‘,.-** /...tcs '' ';',,: -:-;•.' V:''''C- r
'• 'a , ....,', •••:. ...... '-.....s. •,0 ..4`,.' ' ,
' .';:,•%•,.A'1,4* t;tga"' -,, .;., '.„1, '''
1111 ' Xt)1 :4•''''' ' ,
r r
/ ' ---
1111 '""' '''''‘I !Abit/t ' ."• ''''
,...
- - /
/'
.7,.. ,-_,i ;,-,'.., ,.:-
, .. ,,,,,,„:„ -,,,,,_ ...
\ # ill , qi 4
t '' ' - .-,,'"4,,':',. '1'''''."4 i '-' ,„,
liktioif..v.°`',,,,r,,,-' ,,fi: '4,-,,,,".. 7...,
#A
V ;fir f. ' %.,'"4.
ito . ,.
,,t;-:.," — _ , '., ,‘..,,.,,,, ,-, ,,,, ..-
/
. 41 ,, e1 .:44''''' . 1 / //'
a ':
I - .. • . --(7 cf4"
3,
,:,,,,./. gt.... ./
,
PI
do II
, r
03
611 Ask
,,
•
,- 1r o
•
c
o
cn
co
o
o
{ 1;
�, M '4
t
:? „.1., . ..... ,.. . , , 7,--e,-1.. ,- ) w-o- 1. ... , ,t,',-er .
}E�, � . `Mid ::c
,,,a. 4
•
,�,. ,y...,, ,.. ..,...,„
, "d '
.. L..; ' 1 ' it i i''',.° '•14: : .:4444*14:41t4:'1.1):,;e111: SkreU124-1
' 7' . `Ir..„,143 '4 e...4 , .41,,:._,,,:1'44'-A,12 , ,a...a.142111-''"i t"
,„. , . • . '-4., VW,. ..,,,,__Jkaii.- , 7
,,, , . , , ., _ _„,......, ,,,i ., i.:44. ... ..,,,,,,ev ''.7. ''';'''''
&!I//llhII
vim.
. .. , 1, ti.iik
,,,,....t,.„. „ _ ..,
. .
.. „„ ... , •
....„.:•:'3, ASie 1
Ill I
Y.'y ,r,,„.. .0 • y
II
�. t,'
kw
.•
.■al
tr)
m
tr,
' -' ,.,:it-- , l' ""- i • - ,' .
'`'.,,,, -.... .I'''' ,'," .1.1•As ',/,`;'f',,..t,, —
—
..7,-e,t; ' ,,...,....
.4,.1 r,,,,,,,, -,1": ,, ....• , - , . .,t, .. 1 ''' CO
Ye
a)
•iptl, '„,-r,}4:-. 4 - . e;,..,,.; A II
c)
c
jr
q 1
0
o
-c
0
- I
111 Ai
F
, cn
a
to
1 10 1'4' , a
• 03 14P--------4- ' -*-------, ,
---
,....
, a)
640"is;ii-1/74-7,.lir oir k
7 11 -.P7 *---!..41--
, i •i ...,0.. z_leg%?--- -, ..,
;.-____.....•._
,, -. . .4.0v)1 d /iX - - -
.40ie;,-. t , _
tiV 40 :`'. fir
Aim
I '
/
... . .
.1.`:
tr,
-
. ,
f,„4
C ,...,
;1
, , ,1
.
„-0
1
ta 4:5 7
2 4 '
'
141,
4,
i ... ,
.4 .4
,.
.4 ..
,' F--.4i- ,,
1 4* ,
1
?'
or. —'-'i
P;,*1
,w1.-7,,-18,......... ,.
-,. -,,,r,..i. ,r, 4
-,,,,
li' 1. —
I, :,'.,
1-
'!..
1.
\ ,4,,,t....,10 r; 17.,• ..._ , '' ,,.
,4,,
X'•:1-.. ..1":•:,, .i,l' ''''''i . „,„'
10-,
lik1111
t .
•••:. sil
,. .,:,, .,;.,...,;;• ,-.7.''•,1*Xt•- -q. - ,,4,• - , ' ; - — • :•••ti
•,,,-, tn
%,— . ••!! 4.44'• 4,.1 ;
••'.t.. CO
• 1, '., ,-'-'1471';'•'""-.'"..». .- AV ' ' '.'*,-*;', ;7:9
,.., - .=,,,. '41,".i ':• • ",..! V)
1 i t,.. ,-,•:-'•-••.?";„.•-!:',.-ii..'•i. i.',-;''..-1:', [.!' '-.--:::::-.---- = ''"- -. *;-1;.:`,‘.. -'-'"T..,...4"1:4iY., ..i,•,;:" ..;.•=:-.-,,,-,7-7.,.wViiii • . • ,1-'itititil .„ .•'..",• •.'"'"Ii
.:'-•:.:.Y:.::-.-.4••,1-.-..-r '',..,,,''-‘1. 4..,•: • -''"':H.''-' ;-:::14";----0- *AL •' -,"' ' .•:,,,,. f. , ,i,-,'---.*.iir.‘, -74ii".".„,i7.1.!'- ,i
-- -•1-rt.,t..,.p-,-, ....„(4., ..-„,,.- w. ,,_ .,_.-.7". --„.Ii.,,ft,',.,T,•'; ok,-','- •,..,-; •, ' :. ."
' •:.'';;.44'.."•ii":.-.,'i';•:•P?;-,CA.-;i:Y,- ,,- ; - --I`';',--;:';':',„r r-,-:-•4, ....,..:414‘"-7 -1,_ ,,L-',4„,..k....J.wei-.'-- , . -,--,,
gt.
i„.,,,i,....,.,,,,,, •,-::,.„. ,,.„
„,....:...,.,;.::,:.,::..,:.,..,.:,,,,,...._..,:..,. :,..:::_.:,,4::,!,,„"..:, . .. • ,,;,•__..„„1„.•:- .t.,,- ,,,,,,,,,...,:t47.44,.41. . ,ii... ,./c. ,...,... ,,,,,;.;......
, ,
., ,fill ,, i•";'.;•'•,,
.',:' '.'--.•.-:•;',14?-•.•;,,'.;•'''';,•-,. .,4'. - /-;:.: 7PKI .,,-,.;-k'-.:,;f:';;.',-.-,.-,,,„ff..,1,*?1...; - lf,",";'-;• 't.: / i'l, .-`'..,,,l'''..
..ii,•, :•-: r;'; :-..it 1- '4-Al.*: t'LI.: -7''. -.,-,. - .11:-" i -',f•; 1'.-r--..'.;:-1
••1 (/)
..,..„,;,„,•;..-.•q."-,;,,,-„.••',...,-i!"•1•••••: .r.0.!..;4-i., .:.7-.-,'.4%.2,.:i.....*.:',- '
4t.it
'...t.: 4
.....,,...
..'.'-•',,:'"'X., -..••7•;,i'''. •":•:•'''."'K' ''ft'. t - ---°:,14, ,,-,i„-_-•..,, ....4.,...a,..............4.%,t-4....2%..............._;,`,:,... ..,,-,i,t7...._,_,...„,,,......--,•.. ..
ri
1!..,--).,7P:.,,•,•4. ,'••.1.-'.. '
, „. Fr!wl"..:..
- I- •
-';J;;',.-.4.:?,..,,,.:-A'1.
, _
• ''-'11;,.,'7,..'..-,.. . lt...••,
-1-•
-
>
,..,...,,s,1,.-,:,7*?.f, '4,-
,
. „.... ..., „, ,• _.
'''!---'::,i,,,,1.44,*•;t:
- ihlaW- n
•, —
.. ...•7. -
.• ..-, ..,
. i
: -VrVi.1,';`•;."-',.
,.0- '.,
,..
.--- -
• '
-
•-....4
111!1"„.„.-...,,..._.„ I
,..-""•'"if 1 ..s
1 I ' ) lf,=1-7;',;4';.-4,i' - --
-s..;•„-,c.'" ,,,..", A
.,_....,,_
s...
`".'":,-,i1;t4;,...'- 1
••*•
..,
,.' ..• (
.....
. . ,I, 1 ,..7r,.
- - , ki.L AL.''' •-
1 AT . •
.
,
•
.,
1 , . . -
- 1 -•
..-
..„,„. =
=
• 0
1 ;,...,-,-., -.., ' .,,,.1,00,....,,cs
,
1 . .. .
,,,-,4.41
,
. .
'• cn .
i
.-, .•..--.r.,,
kto,,-4,Li.-4...k.
1 . ,
• •
co
___,_
___ _-i i
i t, ,-..„.,-,4. - ,
,
__ , -,.:„. _:.'• - t.---.....41,'4,1.,r. --_--- — ..
, -
.4, .
.....
'.. .
...Ne
,
.- ' '''•':''.: 1 \ I 1:':'.:'
'''it,:7;1;i174'. - I \
1 '
0
. .
,77'747.Wt..
.,- ,f.4
-...."7.-'....' -,"., '*`''-'-'1.4..&•,",41
• 0
_
i''-'-'-'''' • k
..;
_- '
•
... ,--i.,:,
• >,
\"-'''''''''''': \--\" **4,--tIt'-i-tili4:.,,,741:14:1::::!:1;,k ,f b:4,6„,,,,_.1.. ,.„ „...,,,...:„..!.. . ,
,,,,....,...,,m„,„
..,
..,
...:0 _ .
•
.
,
. ,. . , . ._ ...,. . ,
. ..
.
. ..
.. ,__.
\ ,,.„.,,,,,..„.„..,„„,„.... .,:.... ,.. .„,„,„;.,,.., .,..,. ..„...,,„.., , ,,,
. .
- \.:L :.
.. ...
\ 10-4-09,44•:--f:•.,...4:,,•--4,-• --' 4.,!..--;,-7,1*'4.:;?..-'• •; •
_1
, .,
,,,....." ,
\ 1147,-,;,,--.'.-:....,;.,,,-,ir-f.'.''-, • - •, '--,---,,i -,;-:.---,.17!.."1::;6,ZA Plappi` .'
.4-
,
0..
..
# , ....- ---.-- -.--.:7 ...l't, .. •''./... :11o,• ,
'•:;••." a)
, .
•• —
. •
•
. - .
i
• ,..,"--. .!,;
';',.4.'. . •
ilb,.......____—•AA 7,-1-:•,..,'T-,-.44.—.,----- 4,t..,41,•,i4...,,„„v,-..:-.±.:„.i,_*;,;' L 1
„,_,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,;,„„,..„,..,„
- .
. 4
..,. ...
• ...
. ,_.• •
-..--0'4111r, • '4'--
,:4;•
'•',--i,,4-1r,,,-,:•:=0,1',.. ....• :_ '_-"-,zt..6440,_..41111111116..i;-,•-!'"-V?.*:'--:qii!"-Ak4 _•„.","!,'-!: --..i,„,,•,,,....-,--,,,rgyogilt,
- • . .
. • • •• _
.. ..
. .
. , .
„.„,.....,•._..•
, .....
• -
, :. %. ,uk. ••'... -. -.Mr ., , 5.•
. ....-• :. . ,...1 •;".,..
,Ill'... :,..':,- \ ;,;.' .-.. "'t'-':4:.;?-.Y'r:';:,'',,,„'',....:::!1•4:--4)411111111111.....ilif!' ; .,". ''',,,''' 1 '.: .. .,,.,':•,,,,,.'.1,,,';,'"ii';:
•
•-,—,. ,-..-. . „
4.3.;..,`" •• #'
..,,,,, , „.,,,,.........•Trier:30g....,....... , : , , ;.;„ ,:,.7.,...•
' ;"i'•4,.•%;'•- '''- lk .:?)."
."••
' • , .
-.„..
.......
'.e•A
....
4,•••, -
„••,,,..••,..;.,,,
.4,7.
• -,, -, ';-1
••;.• tf.
.,„. .4„ ,,•
f•ri,
f ,., ,,., •
---•••• ,
,:r.,-.....
•• ••,-.•-,.,
• .... ..
.. .. „.
,4',. ,:,:i---'-',•'''-'-- '''-
.. . .
.40•''
- -• ....
,,.....-
Iiikn„--_,•,',.,..
• .,1,,,.;;;;.i..:;;-t.-;?;i.-:-„ - ,,
ffk.
• . . . .
Toirikk,,.i,,,,,.,•.
.,. ,,,*
;!4141.1;t414•;!'.:,',.,.'.,'-,
,e•,:: :!''Ll.' '*'';"--'•';'' '
„.„.
. . .,
-----.•-!. .".:1-..---- .'•.'f,.4 ' . ..
. .
4 ii:.:11V.,'":„. '.'..". .: ..,''','• .;". :
-4i. • •-
.:-P: ' ;;'';' '' , .• • ,•
..,,.....
ilillitER0:1,.`'-"...":•',- •- ,tft-it''-74-;,": ,,i- ;'- L''.-
140-.'-2.;.,;• ..,• . .• .,,
, • .
...-..... „...i.'..1.44.$1••• :1.,-*.:-..'„;"-.;-,_•".!-;-,'.
'.1801,4;.4 .". "- ••-.,,. ',',...
V " ..:•
',11.P.4,44,a,;;;:,?","-,:,;"••• . ." '.-.'-- los"
..- .`t••••'? - • •,..,- , ,
'',01111i3.140C''''.'''''''.- -•••-., '•:• .77,.. -.._.--,'.•
• '
.#i*.,,;ril•'4i:i.i-elJ.1„-iMiir7,,-,:g,!14,,0..40§4.f4r,'0,1,•iIti,.,..,k."if•:1•.'9.,",•;.1-:-..0."i-,,•i,I'0•..,.:'".._,-,•:•.',..,,'..,„..,...."•',••'.•.•..-.,-:',.:-;.::..,.;.-.-.,,.'.,'.,'..:„-.--•„-,;.,--...:-.7-„•'-,-:-,:i.l-'4 j..';';''i./''..--::,,;r•'L":--•,.':,"'i,,--':•:"•:;;,7-;.•;:-'it'--:-‘i;•-A'!•,•''_'t-,,.•1."''.••:;::r-;;':::;•,L',•-'-.',.-.;:::,•1:''..,-.,1.'..,.'-',,.-.:•;-•,•.'-.?•.-.':,i:.•-:..i•:;-...:.:,-„,::."i:'._.:g."..c-.1''•.J.'"':-$i(.-!.,...7,'•.-,;::' ; i1#*,f,Y.:;;i,;-„,-,,,J•.-1z:..-4•-I;...';.,,..:-,'-: •-411„S,,t;.iif..,',:-"V`',.1,„;,,‘';_2'.,„ s"„4,;i',,l,,,,,•-,'"'. ''.-'`.10',,...._-,,,,'7};;-`..,.,,.,. ;•,4,'7.„,,-.4;"._,"-k!,:,,,,,,,,':,,4-:.".'",,'-,,'','',;..-'.('''...-..i:•"',•,'-,
Pg'I t0, . . t
t„-,.:..-,iT,•
,'. • • _•• ".•'..'-•-....... -.
...,
.,.. .
.,,...,.
-rl . -• :-
•,••••,•,.!•••• . •' '2 '11;.• , ki','",;',-; "..,..:
..
figkttN,'"."".,•,''...'!•,. .',;..:........-,,j'...--,',,,,•,.,:,,;.• •:•r,,!'"?,$',;,i, '..-.•,:.'..-;..-..,:•,:.,-,:;'6,...,..Z.:.;-',4-5:4,•. "-,-VI.i)i.„1,0..k; ..'"*".. i'0ti-fi„,ti,l.,,l„Xi4e,„„P.„„ot.„.4,ri,tT„.t.4k4:„k..,4.„I,e'41.:k.„0..1.t4„,.1.-,,.i,1ii.%t„,-..?.1•,1',4gz.,,,,.;,,,4:,.t.S..„:.,..„.,,:..:'.-..•:..!•„•:Je.••;.:•'-'i.-...;.:,...:.',..•r.„."-.':.•,..';,-,-'.-.•..•".,••-•,•..•....•••.•..-.•..,.•.'.-..'..,,•";•'-.".',".:.,-.-•.l•-.,i.••,..:-•...•.L:•_-•;••••••.;..'.,..,;:.;„:'-•.•-1:-.."-:,'-!.,„,„.•!,.,"'•••-•••••.:.,",'•";.-;.--,:;'''..-•.4..•,.•-.1•-..•7--.'-',:..:.-..:,•:'F.-"•.-„,-",-;..--,':t._,1.,.:-'-...-'.i--,:,,.•;:,,--..:;W.-".-,-..-J,1-•;1,7.;...':,.::i.•'i::..:':-.,.;-.,.•:..'.,.-.S,.-*i„•.:-.•".,':i.i-•:-•..-,.-,•::-;:•,---::.,-.,-,:-r•.-:•.:.•::..'-•:::,:.-..:•'-.".'---:-'.-'.-...:....."-".:7--"-.""•:-.,:.."..-•,,-."•',---,-"'..:r'-,--..,:,-;-.,-:*:§:::-,.-'r-;---,-t-'..-:i.,,.:,,-4-,,-.:,,-..,-'-...-.1',-.,-•k-‘,.:(-.:,,-''-,;-;,;-.-..--,-.,..----,-,47--4-1ft-.-w'•-4i',l4'-:*-'z...z,i7,gt,,4f.it4fw,...'..4:tlf,mtiNi,,fi'"u•%-7.A,-„i.i-.-,*i,.t..f1,,0i.,440t;44'
•.•;,"I.--!,,.
-a",::'-•it;,{.l.=,-Ni,
O.t-,-A.i4t#,iff4t--,-z0.il':,-4„f,.,.W.--4,."-i„i-.1.i.iftxr"ic•f',.-f-i...'„,.,'„:f,,z.-4:•-.,•-,t;ti,".-.-1T,.A,-i-i,..!5f,„-7a,,-;••--,'.,-'.-,--..*i'•i,.p,,'.o,..„,.,-‘.t"44.A..e:;.-i,,-,.,•,!.,,-Yc.;•:..,-...-4,-,^'-,".','',„';,,-.,..,,,,',,',,:•-,,--,,L"^':.,,..-''..,....'.-i•.,4-.',:-"
. - 1; :. . ..:.,:.,.,'••-.
-.
....
*..,--•" -•••,-,',,,-'.
i
,. „,.„ : , . -, - tl . I 1 ,.•....',.."!N..rA-...:-.-•.I'-:`
'.s.,-.•,.„,-
..3..
-..1,:-•- .
--
......
•
.. .
..
.•,...,„,,,,,-.,...,,,•••,•.....-,-,--e:....:- ,-„..,..-.--,4 -.41-;*sul-,„Y.-,',:':•1--„Nti,•.]:,,,ARAn-,,A.-.1f.,,%:•;:1?4,41.7-',1-.4-.Wit,'ff;',,*,,E,Vi-'.' '.4 44."'-*".":"• •
:',.1.4,:;41k-,'"!;..',..,"•'•;".';,.:';':-,;;;';;i;!'„•:,•i•,. .-'-';•..,-.3';";; ;' ''-'-' 7'"••-•`-2::::-,1-,;;;;,;,'"iri'3':14-1W.74;44 -.04,4t:t.404°1,•'6j'''''''41',A-'..q3i-t...&,•;J';; ''-'',.L .-. ''":.:-•:-...;-..... ',,, .
347:?!!";Ni.11.). ',6';•,-,";-'7,-.'''-..;'''..,.-;-,',,,'„1".•.,',;:. 7.';'.•."'--'''''',:;;' ,-';-'-.-•".:,::';i: ,';',Iikti,.,,..4t,:,('''.'','-i,lAgt1;"7•*?I'lf irilii';7;',,i -EgtillU:•; : III" '''''':''. - -
-..fiffrilli.-„8-f,;.-:".-". ;,.•';..'•••-';'•,;•;-.-" :,-.:'•:.,•••;;:';''.';- :•.4.'':-•"'-';:',..''.-,'''.:•--"711-,;•'.;4:•'.iii?-701(111,:.#, •11,t!i.',* -,4;.4:4,":41*-S .Ve•liag,-
; •. .,
, „ , . -';','-"--4•C'V''''''41,,,,,-; -, .-,,,,g,h1.-•,,,,,V.i".4',,,...,14.44r'''''''''*';'''4'4°
...4
ilikittti..:f.„,:;',"•,•,'.•,•'.::,',••,•'...:.....-•,...:4,"';',.?••,".'•;'-,'.',''"''-', .''.,7;;:l,::"'"'"'''';',..'.:;-.A?;'4"t1,--1,t4tItIrts,'".*410.g.'•Kirgt4441;144ii.sl-t•Pb.%.-11i-444,4
- :"., ...• r.-..''.
litwolt...,...... -.-',-;,,, ....,::-.-,...,:.•,',.,:;,,'._'_,••',„'",••-.7,-•`:,"!,,,,..„-,..,'-'•..,;.;:,:'",,,.:.-...-Z11;',,;-4.-41.411..:1!;:' ,1?',',4*.!it'AC,!1'60:00`.•;:;':4igi40iiikr4.'4ft
.„_. .,..., .......„.,,•
. .. .• .
•,,, -
.,:t1#.1,'Of:','"I'""•••''-•-•'':.." •• ...:.,g,''',,,,-,.,.....;,.,•i•.•i'i,-.!•?•*,',.,"347 .....•,'`.%;-••‘-'---,-'•;:-.!..,Y.,.-7:1-'•,,'.;..•••*...4?; ..,'?".-,"'K'fv"10.'..•"-'''''4•40.il--4,4tV"if317i.".',143.4f0e2..›'",)Z0•`,,.„.1. ,
igtk...4-Vti',A.-,....,-. -."';..--'''',.'''''''''''':;•4r4"''':'.••••'1. .'''''..1:S".•:'-'.;7.•;•.-;-...:- '.'-..',,4•".J.;i•. ':.t,t43.10.47X.f.rf,14;3.1141-Wii.rititti:,%1,4" -'41.''''''''.- '
. .. . -
, .
'...',V''''''f-'1,?.t:K''.7".:',.'' -••-:!:;-;:: '.''''''''..'-',''',;:i,,"''': ",,,,•; •-,:'.'1:"--.';'';".'"'-:;;-,.',';'-7.---;::.',',i1.?-'1-'-V-4ii.;,,Sti-4 IPACkitiC.'1,-ViAr.17;
• ... .• .. ---
•'.,!".?;;A"..13'.7.-...":"••'.,:....• '••.•,,','. '-'•;•••'','-''.,,,j--,..'";:.'e.y0,......;i:''''',.,:;;''.--,.:.
',,' .161y..1•:',:l.:;Y-"r•-•";,.;:,•„..:,.--,..,•••,, ,-,:i;;:r;,..),1:k•k-,V: ." ,,'"..:,•? :-•,'•!. ..,:i4Pti!#,!",ti,11;',..:ti,ti..!'.e?-4ii-j- ,?4#:MItA.N.4., .•:".
,,,f$'...- ..4,11 ,•.;'-':',-;"''...;,',. ..:, ::•;;:•'..'•r""';''-','Ti. .-.,..,•';•:•.•.c''''.-•.;.•:"•;-.,-;;".-:,,,-.'f',..;,:-.-,";•;-,...,,%Y.'-M•,,,,.,',..,t.:,;,41.'•,.•ii,'Aii4,,;,..te-1,441:;."r"..fg-4:40".
ilkir.''.'%•0114,;;,k,',.'""'",',L;;:.S.;,•'.,;•.'';':',,-;,,":.-,'-•,,t::(.:;.:'•,•,,'.•;;,,.:,'..i-:.1;;..1..''.."...,!: -;--•;-- '.";,.-;.,-;":". 14,4W.PP.-"..!.;14,--",...4K:41,4'.14:134•Ifiik,' -•••..,,,........ '
,.,01•-!,,,,.4.,!,•,-.'",,..-..,-.'....;.-:'. _.„'';'.,.,,.,,.,:,-...-,-,,.:.,-,'--y.„.7,-,.,:,,-.,..:„....!,•";,-.„,,.•,;'-___,;--;:-..,.7.---.----.-;;;,.,,""i;-441-V.,.141;;"TiFii-...1,,AR4:04-„g,y,fr,,, ,:;7;.;,
.,;,:g.?1?:".',.:,11".••-•-;;";;.•••.•.-...;"•''.r: ,';'-•-,LL',-1:-„;.;.,;,-',,i''-.'-'',;,,-"..4--`•-- '..--..---.'-','.'7..V.;_e ':"_"-:„,-:',;-A*_.'_'i,,„'''''-'4;'%iagf;g;T%t;Vf.t•_ffAc.;t,';••: ;!
"-":";'' '''.-J--"I't"::-•i•'•••-.'..••••:',"..";.i.'..;--'.-i-;-;.--".."---•".'i.J,!...,'.•,-••r'';;'-"'..'"--''''":-,;-•-; ..;'-'i-"4----'•••-,i,,,"-5iii4j1;..'ii-fi'-;;.'''.-..,''...rtf't6;14;"-4i;V4IkarTfit...-,,.:-4..i,;,,,,.,
.f.'44,i;A•giii'.'.g...... .......:,..-",.-;-,..'",- ...:.!';','N'',.•":"..• ."".7.-•'- .:..-;-•....::-",''...:••-',•"1-"-'1,.'4-.V4rA.147-',, "?...'7''-'''''.',•,•'ki.'••'?"'";,-""-..Zt'•;-4-C•''';;, ..g.''''''''''''''It'''
.0,"4",".•40t.,"'"i"P" ,'":","•...1.„,•••••.--,",I."--.".;.,LC'4q-•--."..,,,,', ...:14 ,-,*-,,---;."-:•,.-,,-, -- ---'
--iN.01,00..t,,,,.2-"_,,,i."::,,L;iii," :0-' -4:il?--.'""`1'•-;''''''' ';'"•'.
:411.4erilig:-,,,..-,',',...:-,"0,- --
January 4,2011
Salt Lake City Council
RE: Public Safety Building Design
Dear City Council Members;
On behalf of the Salt Lake City Police and Fire Departments,we would like to express our enthusiasm for
the design work that has been done so far on the new Public Safety Building by GSBS and MWL
architects. We are pleased that the building that has been designed will be highly functional and meet
the needs of our departments.The functionality and design of the new Public Safety Building will help us
continue in our mission to maintain and improve public safety in Salt Lake City.
As part of the PSB Steering Committee,we have worked closely with the project manager,architect and
the contractor during the program development,concept design and criteria design phases. We are
pleased with the design as the building is currently envisioned largely because it accommodates the
needs and features of a modern police and fire facility in the following ways:
• The building will provide improved opportunity for greater internal departmental collaboration
including collaboration between the police and fire departments.
• The design incorporates all critical spaces that are required to address emergency situations in a
professional and comprehensive manner.
• The layout of the facility is efficient and has mostly eliminated hallways by providing open working
environments for both improved communication and future flexibility.
• The first floor provides for public access,an exhibit space for police and fire artifacts and community
meeting space.The first floor organization will create an open relationship with the community.
These functional elements described above as well as other functional relationship that this new
building incorporates,will allow for higher level of communication throughout all police and fire
divisions which will become a great resource and tool that will aid in the accomplishment of both
departments.
The fire and police departments would also like to express our appreciation to the City Council for their
support and commitment to providing a state-of-the-art Police and Fire Administration Building that will
not only improve the working conditions of the police and fire employees while making the community
safer and better prepared to handle a major earthquake or other emergency.
Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for this great project.
Sincerely,
Tim Doubt Brian Dale
Deputy Chief,SLCPD Deputy Chief,SLCFD
R AEIV D
I``ll _ `pa �,, tin',j, f ��
FRANK B. GRAY '.+� �tu .i 1 ' I CEIVED
RALPH BECKER
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECO - C D VELOPMEN
R
OFFICE OF THE SLC COUNCIL OFFICE tY DE LA MARE-SCHAEFER
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
DEC 1 0 2010
ROBERT FARRINGTON, JR.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR Salt Lake City Mayor
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
SCANNED TO:
Date ReceivedcS CA N N E D BY:
• •, �cr , € aff DATE: \1 / 4
ier- t
Date Sent to City Council: L2- t(3 f 7.6/0
TO: Salt Lake City Council DATE: December 10, 2010
JT Martin, Chair —4
FROM: Frank Gray, Community & Econo is
Development Department Director
RE: Request for confirmation by resolution of a Development Agreement required by
Ordinance 55 of 2006, which adopted amendments to the Capitol Hill Master Plan
and change of zoning for the properties generally located on the East and West sides
of 300 West Street, between 500 North Street and 600 North Street.
STAFF CONTACTS: Nole Walkingshaw Planning Program Supervisor, at 801-535-7128
or nole.walkingshaw@slcgov.com
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council confirm by resolution the
"Marmalade West" Development Agreement between Howa
Capital, LLC and the Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
required by Ordinance 55 of 2006.
DOCUMENT TYPE: Resolution
BUDGET IMPACT: None
DISCUSSION:
Issue Origin: The City Council passed Ordinance 55 of 2006 to amend the future land use map
for the Capitol Hill Master Plan to reflect"High Density Mixed Use"for both the east and west
sides of the subject property. Additionally, the subject properties are presently zoned Mixed Use
"MU," Moderate Density Multi Family "RMF-35," Moderate/High Density Multi-Family
Residential "RMF-45," Community Shopping"CS" and Special Development Pattern
Residential "SR-1." Ordinance 55 of 2006 uniformly classifies the subject properties
Residential/Mixed Use"RMU."
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404
P.O. BOX 145486, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5486
TELEPHONE: 801-535-6230 FAX: 801-535-6005
WWW.SLCGOV.COM/CED
If
►f RED YCL ED PAPER
Two conditions were attached to the Ordinance at its adoption.-The first condition is the ,.
execution of a Development Agreement. Attached is a letter from DJ Baxter, Executive Director
of the RDA, requesting a resolution and confirming that on October 2, 2008, in connection with
the sale of the West parcel by the RDA to Howa Capital, LLC ("Howa"), the RDA and Howa
executed a Development Agreement for the redevelopment of the West Parcel (but not the East
Parcel, which was not purchased by Howa). This project, known as "Marmalade West," was
finished last spring. At the time the Development Agreement was executed, both parties
simultaneously executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with respect to the East Parcel. The
Purchase and Sale Agreement expired in March, 2010, and therefore, no development agreement
has been executed with respect to the East Parcel.
The second condition specified in section 4 of the Ordinance, is that the Development
Agreement must be confirmed by resolution of the City Council. If the City Council confirms the
Development Agreement, the Executive Director of the RDA, in accordance with Section 5 of
the Ordinance, will notify the City Recorder that both conditions have been satisfied.
Analysis: The original purpose of this request was to fulfill the objectives of the Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City. In 1996 the West Capitol Hill Neighborhood was designated by the
RDA as a redevelopment project area. Since that time the focus of the Redevelopment Agency
has been to revitalize the area with the intent of creating a mixed-use commercial/residential
node that would revitalize and stabilize the area and allow for private reinvestment.
The "Marmalade West" development reflects these objectives and is consistent with the executed
0.4
Development Agreement. The East Parcel remains under the ownership of the RDA, which is
now focused on remarketing this property. Staff recommends confirmation of the Development
Agreement and recording of Ordinance 55 of 2006, amending the Master Plan and zoning
classification for all subject properties identified therein. Staff believes that the R-MU zoning
intended for the East Parcel is consistent with the intentions of future development strategies.
The RDA Board, consistent with past practice, will not sell the East Parcel unless the purchaser
agrees to enter into a development agreement with the RDA in form and substance satisfactory to
the RDA Board.
Master Plan Considerations: Amends the Future Land Use Map for the Capital Hill Master
Plan to reflect "High Density Mixed Use" for the subject properties.
PUBLIC PROCESS: There have been no additional public processes relating specifically to
the request for confirmation by resolution. The subject Ordinance was processed in accordance
with all required notifications and hearings leading up to its adoption on August 8, 2006.
RELEVANT ORDINANCES: Ordinance 55 of 2006 is attached.
Table of Contents
1. Chronology
2. Resolution
3. Ordinance
4. Letter from Redevelopment Agency Director
a. Development agreement
b. Marmalade project background document prepared by
RDA Staff
CHRONOLOGY
Marmalade Rezoning Petition 400-05-40
November 18, 2005 Petition 400-05-40 Application submitted by Howa Capitol, LLC.
November 21, 2005 Petition received in Planning Division
December 16, 2005 Planning Commission Planned Development Subcommittee Meeting
January 18, 2006 Capitol Hill Community Council Presentation
January 18, 2006 Planning Commission Planned Development Subcommittee Meeting
March 29, 2006 Planning Commission Planned Development Subcommittee Meeting
April 26, 2006 Planning Commission holds a public hearing
April 28, 2006 Ordinance requested from City Attorney's office
May 19, 2006 Ordinance received from City Attorney's office
June 26, 2006 Council receives transmittal
July 11, 2006 Council Briefing from Administration, Hearing date set
August 8, 2006 Council Hearing
October 3, 2008 Development agreement signed
October 8, 2008 Building Permits issued for"Marmalade West Project"
July 20, 2010 Building, Certificates of Occupancy issued for "Marmalade West Project"
October 8, 2010 Meeting with Community and Economic Development, Planning Management the
Developer and Agents to discuss potential for drive through coffee use. Use
determined to be not permitted in the R-MU zoning district, upon further review of
ordinance it was discovered that the resolution to record the ordinance had not
occurred.
November 16, 2010 Confirmation of Executed Development Agreement letter received in Planning
1
RESOLUTION NO. OF 201_
(Confirming a development agreement per Ordinance No. 55 of 2006)
A resolution confirming a development agreement entered into between the
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City("RDA"), Marmalade H&J, LLC, and Marmalade K,
LLC pursuant to a condition of Ordinance No. 55 of 2006.
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 55 of 2006 approved an amendment to the City's zoning
map, conditioned upon the execution of a development agreement between the RDA Board and
the development applicant in that matter; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 55 of 2006 further required that said development agreement
be confirmed by resolution of the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council"); and
WHEREAS, the interests of the development applicant, Howa Capital, LLC, have
succeeded to Marmalade H&J, LLC and Marmalade K, LLC regarding the "West Parcel"; and
WHEREAS, the RDA has entered into a development agreement with Marmalade H&J,
LLC and Marmalade K, LLC pertaining to development of the "West Parcel".
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake City:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby confirm the execution of a development
agreement between the RDA Board and the development applicant regarding the "West Parcel"
in accordance with the condition set forth in Section 4 of Ordinance No. 55 of 2006.
DATED this day of , 201 .
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of
, 201 .
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL ..911460,
By:
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CITY RECORDER
HB_ATTY-k 15 746-v 1-Resolution_confirming_development_agreement_Howa.DOC
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attorney's Office
Date:
By:
Pa 11C.Nielson, et or Cur Attorney
„rwnNIN
7
0 06-1
P 06-12
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. 55 of 2006
(Rezoning Properties on the East and West Sides of 300 West Street,Between 500 North Street
and 600 North Street, and Amending the Capitol Hill Master Plan)
REZONING PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST
SIDES OF 300 WEST STREET, BETWEEN 500 NORTH STREET AND 600 NORTH
STREET, FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ZONING DESIGNATIONS, INCLUDING SPECIAL
DEVELOPMENT PATTERN RES I I)ENTIAL DISTRICT (SR-1), COMMUNITY SHOPPING
DISTRICT(CS), MODERATE/HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
(RMF-45),MODERATE DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (RMF-35),
AND MIXED USE DISTRICT(MU), TO RESIDENTIAL/MIXED USE DISTRICT(R-MU),
AND AMENDING THE CAPITOL HILL MASTER PLAN, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO.
400-05-40.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah,
have held public hearings and have taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing, and
demographic details of the area, the long range general plans of the City, and any local master
plan as part of their deliberations. Pursuant to these deliberations, the City Council has
concluded that the proposed amendments to the Master Plan and change of zoning for the
properties generally located on the East and West sides of 300 West Street, between 500 North
Street and 600 North Street, is appropriate for the development of the community in that area and
in the best interest of the city.
NOW. THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. REZONING OF PROPERTIES. The properties generally located on the
East and West sides of 300 West Street,between 500 North Street and 600 North Street, which
are more particularly described on Exhibit"A"attached hereto and identified therein as the "East
Parcel"and "West Parcel," shall be and hereby are rezoned from their respective zoning
designations,including: 1) Special Development Pattern Residential District (SR-1), 2)
Community Shopping District(CS), 3)Moderate/High Density Multi-Family Residential District
(RMF-45), 4)Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential District(RMF-35), and 5)Mixed Use
District(MU), to Residential/Mixed Use District(R-MU).
SECTION 2. AMENDMENT TO ZONING MAP. The Salt Lake City Zoning Map,
adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning districts,
shall be, and hereby is amended consistent with the rezoning of properties identified above.
SECTION 3. AMENDMENT OF MASTER PLAN. The Capitol Hill Master Plan, as
previously adopted by the Salt Lake City Council, shall be, and hereby is amended consistent
with the rezoning set forth herein and shall be further amended to reflect"high density mixed
use"rather than"general commercial"for the properties located on the East side of 300 West
Street,between 500 North Street and 600 North Street, which are more particularly described on
Exhibit"A" attached hereto and identified therein as the "East Parcel."
SECTION 4. CONDYIIONS. This Ordinance is conditioned upon a Development
Agreement executed by the RDA Board and confirmed by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. The City Recorder is instructed not to publish or
record this Ordinance until the Director of the RDA has identified that the conditions set forth
herein have been satisfied. If the conditions set forth herein have not been satisfied within one
year after adoption, the Ordinance shall become null and void.
2
SECTION 6. TIME. The City Council may,by resolution, for good cause shown, extend
the deadlines set forth herein.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah this I day of= mot ,
2006.
i
a_e____z/
CHAIRPERSON
AEST:
i ► r
C lEF DEPUTY C Y RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on 9-12-06 ,
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
CHIEF DEPUTY TY RE ORDER
--.;'w:_=ri; APPROVED AS TO FORM
Ba�et klr� .��R l ice ity Attorneys Mee?§, V Date
(SEAL) s. .ri's't is
Bill No. 55 of 2006. �`�i7 e; -•^:`ter,.-1,�',
Published: ,
L\Ordinance 05\Rezoning East and West Sides of 300 West,Between 500 North Street and 600 North Street-08-16-06 draft.doc
3
Exhibit"A"
Boundary Descriptions
Approximate Location:
Both Sides of 300 West Street,between 500 and 600 North Streets
Affected Sidwell Numbers:
East side: 08-36-205-001, -005, -006, -007, -008, -010,-012, -019, -020, -021, -022,
-026, -027,-028, -031, -033, -035
West side: 08-36-204-019, -020, -022, -027, -028, -029, -030, -032
EAST PARCEL
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCK 132, PLAT A,
SALT LAKE CITY SURVEY,AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 00°01'28" EAST
ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 132, 660.24 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5 OF SAID BLOCK 132; THENCE NORTH
89°59'33" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 132, 201.92
FEET;THENCE SOUTH 00°01'15" WEST 177.50 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89°59'33"
WEST 37.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 5;
THENCE SOUTH 00°01'15" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 70.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°59'33" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°01'15" WEST
82.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID BLOCK
132; THENCE NORTH 89°59'59" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 144.94 Amok
FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE SOUTH
00°01'02" WEST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, 330.16 FEET TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 89°59'35" WEST
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 132, 329.92 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS: 171,579 SQ.FT. OR 3.939 ACRES
WEST PARCEL
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 133,PLAT A, SALT LAKE
CITY SURVEY, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 00°02'52" WEST ALONG THE
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 133, 521.82 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH
00°02'52" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 26.64 FEET FROM THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 8 OF SAID BLOCK 133; THENCE NORTH
89°54'03" WEST 131.66; THENCE NORTH 00°02'45" EAST 155.06 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 89°53'28" WEST 16.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'45" EAST 73.33
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'28" EAST 16.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'45"
EAST 146,80 FEET;THENCE NORTH 89°53'11" WEST 16.52 FEET;THENCE
NORTH 00°02'45" EAST 40.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'11" EAST 16.32
FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°02'45" EAST 106.33 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 133;THENCE SOUTH 89°52'54" EAST
ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 131.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS: 70,604 SQ.FT, OR 1.621 ACRES
RALPH BECKER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY D.J. BAXTER
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER OF SALT LAKE CITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
November 16, 2010
Mr. Wilf Sommerkorn, Director
Salt Lake City Planning Division
451 S. State Street, Room 406
P.O. Box 5480
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480
Re: Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 55 of 2006 (Property Located on East and West
Sides of 300 West between 500 and 600 North) ---
Confirmation of Executed Development Agreement
Dear Wilf.
As you know, Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 55 of 2006 (the"Ordinancd)rezoned the"East Parcel'
and the"West Parcel'(as such terms are defined in the Ordinance) to Residential/Mixed Use
District (R-MU), subject to the two conditions set forth in Section 4 of the Ordinance.
The first condition is the execution of a Development Agreement. This letter is to confirm that
on October 2, 2008, in connection with the sale of the West Parcel by the RDA to Howa Capital,
LLC (`Howdy, the RDA and Howa executed a Development Agreement for the redevelopment of
the West Parcel (but not the East Parcel, which was not purchased by Howa). A copy of this
Development Agreement is attached. This project, known as"Marmalade West"was finished last
spring. At the time the Development Agreement was executed, both parties simultaneously
executed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with respect to the East Parcel. The Purchase and Sale
Agreement expired in March, 2010, and therefore no development agreement has been executed
with respect to the East Parcel.
The second condition specified in Section 4 of the Ordinance is that the Development Agreement
must be confirmed by a resolution of the City Council. If the City Council so confirms the
Development Agreement, I will, in accordance with Section 5 of the Ordinance, notify the City
Recorder that both conditions have been satisfied.
The RDA; which remains the owner of the East Parcel, is now focused on remarketing this
property and has hired Citiventure Associates to guide it through a development strategy process.
The RDA Board has stated its desire to create a community gathering place that could possibly
include a branch of the Salt Lake City Library. I believe the R-MU zone intended for this
451 SOUTH STATE, ROOM 418
P❑ Box 145518, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 14
TELEPHONE: 801-535-7240 FAX: 801.S35-7245
WWW.SLCRDA.COM
property would be consistent with such plans for future development. In addition, the RDA
Board, consistent with past practice,will not sell the East Parcel unless the purchaser agrees to
enter into a development agreement with the RDA in form and substance satisfactory to the RDA
Board.
I understand from your office that the deadline for the satisfaction of the two conditions in the
Ordinance has been extended until February 8, 2011. If the City Council confirms the
Development Agreement by resolution prior to such date, please let me know.
Please let me know if you require any additional information.
Sincerely,
-K//Ck
D.J. Baxtef
Executive Director
cc: Frank Gray, Director, Salt Lake City Community & Economic Development
10/006/2 008 03:29 PM =
Book i; - t•_;�9 c 3-E
J
'fir'`:'_ F`; - 'a^:t"?..r,:,,
t ..•. CRINT'r; IT H
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
ITi -
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: E'.` ,TE+. r•rr STY 1,7 _ -
Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Attn: Executive Director
451 South State Street, #418
P.O. Box 14458
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5518
(Above space for recorder's use only)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(West Side)
between
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
and
MARMALADE H&J, LLC
and
MARMALADE K, LLC
Sidw'ell Nos.: 08-36-204-032
08-36-204-027
08-36-204-028
08-26-204-029
08-26-204-030
08-36-204-019
08-36-204-020
08-36-204-021
08-36-204-022
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(West Side)
This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the- cof
October, 2008 by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY, a
public agency ("Agency"), and MARMALADE H&J, LLC, a Utah limited liability company,
and MARMALADE K, LLC, a Utah limited liability company (together, "Developer"), both of
whom are collectively referred to herein as the"Parties", and individually as a"Party."
WHEREAS, Agency and Howa Capital, LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Howa")
entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 16, 2008 (the "Purchase
Agreement"), pursuant to which Agency agreed to sell, and Howa agreed to purchase, on the
terms and conditions contained therein, certain property located on the west side of 300 West
Street between 500 North and 600 North in Salt Lake City, Utah;
WHEREAS, in the Purchase Agreement, Howa agreed that, in the event of a closing
thereunder, it would construct certain improvements (as more particularly defined below, the
"Developer Improvements") on the Property (as defined below) in accordance with the terms of
a development agreement in the form hereof;
WHEREAS, the rights and obligations of Howa under the Purchase Agreement have
been assigned to and assumed by Marmalade H&J, LLC; and
WHEREAS, Developer owns the Property as of the date hereof and, in connection with
the closing of such purchase, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement;
NOW. THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Definitions
As used herein, the following terms shall have the meanings respectively indicated:
"Agency" means the Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City, a public agency, and includes
any successor designated by Agency or succeeding to Agency.
"Architect" means Prescott Muir and Associates, the Utah licensed architect hired by Developer
to perfouu design and architectural services in connection with the Developer Improvements.
"Architect Contract" means that certain Standard Foiui of Agreement between Owner and
Architect (AIA Document B1431-1997) dated as of July 7, 2006 between Developer and
Architect.
"City" means Salt Lake City Corporation, a municipal corporation.
"Contractor" means the Utah licensed contractor hired by Developer to construct the Developer
Improvements.
Page 1
857293.4
"Construction Contract" means the construction contracts approved by Agency pursuant to
Section 3.2 of the Purchase Agreement.
"Developer Improvements"means the improvements to be constructed on the Property by
Developer as described in Exhibit B attached hereto and as shown on the Site Plan.
"Events of Force Majeure" means any event or period of delay preventing the
performance of Developer's obligations, which delay is caused by strikes, lock-outs, fire or other
casualty, inclement weather abnounal for the period of time and not reasonably anticipatable, the
elements or acts of God, war, riot, insurrections or shortages of or unusual delays in the delivery
of construction materials (which have been ordered in a timely manner) or other causes, other
than financial and managerial, beyond the reasonable control of Developer or the Contractor, or
their subcontractors of any tier, agents or employees.
"Final Construction Documents" means the final construction documents for the
Developer Improvements prepared by the Architect and dated March 28, 2008, which were
approved by Agency pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. A copy of the index sheet of the Final
Construction Documents is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
"Major Subcontractor" means Ferran Construction and Okland Construction.
"Option Agreement" shall have the meaning assigned thereto in the Purchase
Agreement.
"Property" means the real property upon which the Developer Improvements are to be
constructed as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
"Punchlist Items" means items which are qualitatively minor and which do not materially
impair Developer's ability to use the Developer Improvements for their intended purpose or
materially impair Developer's ability to occupy the Developer Improvements.
"Records" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 3.11 below.
"Reverter Agreement" means that certain Special Warranty Deed and Right of Reverter
Agreement recorded in Salt Lake County Official Records on the date hereof pursuant to which
Agency conveyed the Property to Developer subject to the covenants and conditions contained
therein.
"Schedule of Development" means the respective times for the completion of the construction
of the Developer Improvements set forth in Exhibit D attached hereto.
"Site Plan" means the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit C which generally depicts the
Property and the configuration of the Developer Improvements.
ARTICLE 2
Requirements for the Development of the Property
Page 2
857293.4
2.l Insurance. Building Permits and Bonds. Prior to commencing any construction
activities on the Property or adjacent property or any construction staging area, Developer shall
(or Developer shall cause the Contractor to) deliver to Agency the following:
(a)certificates of insurance verifying that the insurance required under Sections
2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 has been obtained.
(b)copies of all permits, including without limitation building permits, which are
required by the City or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the
construction of the Developer Improvements.
(c) a performance bond and a payment bond from each Major Subcontractor,
naming the Major Subcontractor as principal and the Contractor, Agency and Developer
as dual obligees,jointly and severally, written on bond forms, approved by Agency and
Developer in a penal amount of not less than the full amount of the contract price for the
construction of the Developer Improvements, together with (i) a certified and current
copy of the power of attorney for the attorney-in-fact who executes the bonds on behalf
of the surety and (ii) evidence that the penal sum shall be within the maximum specified
for such surety; provided,however, that in the event that that the senior lender under the
Construction Financing (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) requires payment and
performance bonds with terms reasonably acceptable to Agency, Agency will accept such
bonds to satisfy the requirements of the Development Agreement.
2.2Propertv Insurance. Developer shall maintain property insurance in the amount of the
contract price for construction of the Developer Improvements (including any increase in price
based on change orders) on a replacement cost basis without voluntary deductibles in excess of
$50,000. Such property insurance shall be maintained, unless otherwise agreed in writing by all
persons and entities who are beneficiaries of such insurance, until final payment has been made
to the Contractor for the construction of the Developer Improvements. Agency shall be named
as an additional named insured of such insurance policy. Such insurance shall include the
interests of Agency, Developer, Contractor and any subcontractors and sub-subcontractors in the
work. Such property insurance shall be on an all-risk policy form and shall insure against the
perils of fire and extended coverage and physical loss or damage including, without duplication
of coverage, flood, earthquake, theft, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, false work,
temporary buildings and debris removal, including demolition occasioned by enforcement of any
applicable legal requirements, and shall cover reasonable compensation for the Architect's
services and expenses required as a result of such insured loss. Developer shall also maintain
Boiler and Machinery Insurance which shall specifically cover such insured objects during
installation until final acceptance by Developer. Agency shall be named as an additional named
insured of such insurance policy. Such insurance shall include the interests of Agency,
Developer, the Contractor, subcontractors and sub-subcontractors in the work.
2.3Contractor's Insurance. Developer shall cause the Contractor to maintain insurance
with at least the following minimum insurance coverages:
(a)Workers' compensation insurance in the amount of the statutory limit;
Page 3
857293.4
(b)Employers' liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000; and
(c)The Contractor's Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, including
coverages of owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, shall be written with combined
single limits (including personal injury liability, bodily injury liability and property
damage liability) of not less than$3,000,000 per each occurrence during the policy year.
(d)The Contractor's General Liability Insurance shall be written on a Commercial
General Liability coverage form, which coverages shall include Independent Contractor's
Liability coverage, Blanket Contractual Liability Endorsement, premise and operation
coverage, Broad Form Property Damages Endorsement, explosion, collapse and
underground hazard coverage, fire legal liability coverage, Product-Completed
Operations coverage and coverage (which shall be kept in effect for two years after the
completion of the Developer Improvements) and Personal Advertising Injury Coverage.
The coverage limits shall be not less than the following:
(i)Each Occurrence limit- $3,000,000
(ii)General Aggregate - $3,000,000
(iii)Product/Completed Operations Aggregate - $3,000,000
(iv)Personal and Advertising Injury Limit - $3,000,000
Developer and Agency shall be additional named insureds on the Contractor's General Liability
Insurance and Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance. The Contractor's General
Liability Insurance and Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance shall be provided on an
"occurrence" form and not on a"claims made" form.
2.4Architect's Insurance. Developer shall cause the Architect to continuously maintain
during the course of its perfoiinance of professional services, insurance as follows:
(a)General Liability Insurance written on an occurrence basis with per claim and
aggregate annual limits of liability of not less than $1,000,000 and with a deductible or
self-insured retention of not greater than$10,000; and
(b)Professional liability insurance with per claim and aggregate annual limits of
liability of not less than $2,000,000 and with a deductible or self-insured retention of not
greater than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000).
The Professional Liability Insurance shall be maintained without interruption for a period of two
(2) years after the date of the completion of the Developer Improvements. Developer and
Agency shall be additional named insureds on Architect's General Liability Insurance.
2.5lnsurance Requirements Generally. Each insurance policy and bond required
hereunder must be issued by a company lawfully authorized to do business in the State of Utah
rated A- or better with a financial size category of class VIII or larger by A.M. Best Company
and, in the case of the bonds, from a surety holding a certificate of authority as an acceptable
Page 4
857293.4
surety on federal bonds as listed by the United States Department of Treasury (Circular 570, as
amended) in its most recent list at the time of issuance of the applicable bond. Developer shall,
and shall obtain the agreement of Contractor and Architect to,permit Agency, upon request, to
examine the original insurance policies required hereby along with any endorsements thereto. In
the event the aggregate annual limits of any insurance policies required in Sections 2.3 and 2.4
above are depleted below the aggregate annual limits required set forth therein because of
payment of claims, defense costs or any other reason, Developer shall require that the Contractor
or Architect, as the case may be, purchase such additional insurance coverage as is necessary to
cause such insurance policy(ies)to achieve the aggregate annual limits of liability required in
Sections 2.3 and 2.4 above. Developer shall provide in its contracts with the Contractor and
Architect that if the Contractor or Architect at any time neglects or refuses to provide the
insurance required herein, or should such insurance be canceled, Developer shall have the right,
but not the obligation, to procure the same at the cost and expense of the Contractor and
Architect, and the cost thereof may be deducted by Developer from any monies then due or
thereafter to become due to the Contractor and the Architect. Developer shall promptly exercise
its rights under such contracts. Developer shall bear all costs, expenses and damages incurred by
Agency arising from such failure to purchase and maintain insurance required by this
Agreement.
ARTICLE 3
Agreements to Develop the Property
3.1 Developer Obligation. Developer agrees to cause the Property to be developed in ,.
accordance with the teinus and provisions set forth in this Agreement.
3.2Construction of Developer Improvements. Within three business days of the date
hereof, Developer shall commence and thereafter diligently prosecute to completion the
construction of the Developer Improvements in accordance with this Agreement. Subject to
Events of Force Majeure, by the time set forth in the Schedule of Development, Developer shall
substantially complete the Developer Improvements in accordance with the Final Construction
Documents and the requirements of all governmental authorities and fire underwriters, except for
"Punchlist Items." Developer shall have an additional sixty (60) days to complete the Punchlist
Items.
3.3Cost of Construction of Developer Improvements. The cost of developing and
constructing the Developer Improvements and all other costs shall be borne solely by Developer.
3.4Change Orders. Developer shall obtain Agency's prior written approval to any change
order to the contract with the Contractor that (either individually or together with any previous
change orders) reduce the size of any element of the Project (more than 5%) or involve the
substitution of any materials or design specified in the Final Construction Documents that have a
lower cost or is otherwise inconsistent with Developer's Obligations under Section 4.7 of the
Purchase Agreement.
3.5Certificate of Completion. After completion of all construction and development of
the Developer Improvements, Developer shall provide a certificate to Agency to that effect
signed by Developer and the Architect, and Developer shall provide a certificate (the "LEED"
Page 5
857293.4
Certificate) from the Architect certifying that the construction of the Developer Improvements is
consistent with the design elements required to achieve the "certified" level according to the
LEED standards established by the U.S. Green Building Council (official certification will not be
required). If the Agency finds that the certificates are in order, Agency shall furnish Developer a
certificate of completion("Certificate of Completion") upon written request therefor by
Developer. The Certificate of Completion shall be a preliminary determination of satisfactory
completion of Developer's obligations required by this Agreement with respect to the Developer
Improvements and the Certificate of Completion shall so state. Notwithstanding any issuance of
a Certificate of Completion, the duty of Developer to construct the Developer Improvements in
accordance with the Final Construction Documents shall survive the issuance of a Certificate of
Completion and causes of action related to the Developer Improvements shall be limited solely
by the applicable statute of limitations. A Certificate of Completion shall be in recordable form
and may, at the option of Developer, be recorded in the Recorder's Office of Salt Lake County.
If Agency refuses or fails to furnish a Certificate of Completion for the Developer Improvements
within twenty (20) days after a written request from Developer, Agency shall, within five (5)
days of written request therefor, provide Developer with a written statement of the reasons
Agency refused or failed to furnish a Certificate of Completion. The statement shall also contain
Agency's opinion of the actions Developer must take to obtain a Certificate of Completion. A
Certificate of Completion shall not constitute evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any
obligation of Developer to any holder of any mortgage, or any insurer of a mortgage securing
money loaned to finance the Developer Improvements, or any part thereof.
3.6Rights of Access. For the purpose of assuring compliance with this Agreement, so
long as they comply with all safety rules of Developer and its Contractor, including signing a
standard construction area release, representatives of Agency shall have the right of access to the
Property without charges or fees, during the period of construction for the purposes of this
Agreement, including, but not limited to, the inspection of the work being performed in
constructing the Developer Improvements. In addition, Agency shall have the right to enter the
Property (and the improvements thereon) or any part thereof at all reasonable times for the
purpose of exercising Agency's remedies, including cure rights contained in this Agreement and
for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair or service of any public improvements
or public facilities located on the Property.
3.7Local. State and Federal Laws. Developer shall carry out the construction of the
Developer Improvements in compliance with all applicable federal, state, county, municipal and
other local laws, regulations, codes and ordinances, licenses, permits and orders.
3.8Antidiscrimination During Construction. Developer, for itself and agrees that in the
construction of the Developer Improvements, its Contractor, subcontractors, sub-subcontractors,
Architect, and its and their agents and employees, shall not discriminate against any employee
or applicant for employment on any unlawful basis. Developer agrees not to discriminate against
or segregate any person or group of persons on any unlawful basis in the sale, lease, rental,
sublease; transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property or any part thereof or of
any Developer Improvements erected or to be erected thereon or any part thereof. Developer
agrees that it shall not obtain any grants, financing, subsidy or other inducements that would
require it to discriminate against any person or group of persons on the basis of income or source
of income in connection with the sale, lease, rental, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or
Page 6
857293.4
enjoyment of the Property hereby conveyed or any part thereof or of any Developer
Improvements erected or to be erected thereon or any part thereof.
3.9Event of Force Majeure. Developer shall immediately notify Agency of the
occurrence of an Event of Force Majeure and a proposed adjustment to applicable dates in the
Schedule of Development, which Developer and Agency shall then modify as appropriate. If
Developer fails to so provide Agency with written notice of the occurrence of an Event of Force
Majeure, Developer shall have waived the right to claim an Event of Force Majeure.
3.10One Percent for Art. One percent (1%) of the Purchase Price (as defined in the
Purchase Agreement) shall, at the election of Developer, either be (i) donated by Developer to
the "Percent for Art Fund" as set forth in Section 2.30 of the Salt Lake City Ordinances or any
successor ordinance or policy for art work in the West Capitol Hill Project Area, or(ii) paid by
Developer for the installation of an art feature on the Property. In the event Developer elects to
install an art feature on the Property, it shall first obtain Agency's written approval of the art
feature and its location. Developer shall complete its donation to the Percent for Art Fund or its
installation of an art feature on the Property, as the case may be,prior to or concurrent with its
completion of the Developer Improvements.
3.11 Maintenance of Records. Developer shall keep complete and comprehensive records
and books of account as to all of its activities, including the performance of its obligations, under
this Agreement. Developer shall maintain all records pursuant to Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) and pursuant to pronouncements by the Financial Accounting „,
Standards Board (FASB). Upon not less than five (5) business days prior written notice to
Developer, Agency shall have reasonable access during customary business hours to all records,
functions, property and to the extent reasonably available personnel of Developer, including
Developer's consultants and subcontractors under this Agreement, for the purpose of reviewing
and auditing,, at Agency expense, all records of Developer related to the Developer
Improvements as necessary to determine Developer's entitlement to receive Reimbursements
under this Agreement. Such right shall include access and rights to Developer's records, which
shall include, but not be limited to, accounting records (hard copy, as well as computer readable
data if it can be made available), written policies and procedures; subcontract files (including
proposals of successful and unsuccessful bidders, bid recaps, etc.); original estimates; estimating
work sheets; correspondence; change order files (including documentation covering negotiated
settlements); backcharge logs and supporting documentation; general ledger entries detailing
cash and trade discounts earned, insurance rebates and dividends; and any other supporting
evidence deemed necessary by Agency (all the foregoing hereinafter referred to as "Records").
The Records shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and/or reproduction by Agency or
authorized representatives to the extent reasonably necessary to adequately permit evaluation and
verification of cost of the work. Agency's audits may require inspection and copying from time
to time and at reasonable times and places of any and all Records pertaining to the
Reimbursements that may in Agency's judgment have any bearing on or pertain to any matters,
rights, duties or obligations under or covered by this Agreement.
3.12Release of Existing_ Deed of Trust. A Deed of Trust made by Tuneup Masters, Inc.
in favor of Dresdner Bank, A.G. Developer recorded October 16, 1997 as Entry No. 6764773 in
Book 7782 at Page 2537 of the records of the Salt Lake County Recorder's Office, the beneficial
Page 7
857293.4
interest of which was assigned to Turn Holdings, Inc. pursuant to an assignment recorded July
17, 1998 as Entry No. 7030901 in Book 8039 at Page 2886 of such records, encumbered the
property described as the "Building K Property" on Exhibit A hereto (the "Existing Deed of
Trust"). The deed of reconveyance previously recorded with respect to the Exiting Deed of Trust
may have been improperly executed. Developer agrees to use its commercially reasonable
efforts to cause the Existing Deed of Trust to be properly reconveyed or made legally ineffective
pursuant to the appropriate Utah statutory process no later than 120 days from the date hereof.
ARTICLE 4
Indemnity.
4.11ndemnification. Developer assumes all responsibility, both before and after the
issuance of the Certificate of Completion for, and holds Agency and the City, and their
consultants, officers, employees and agents harmless from, and agrees to indemnify and defend,
Agency, the City and their consultants, officers, employees and agents (collectively and
individually the "Indemnitees"), against, all claims, liabilities, losses, costs and expenses
(including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, reasonable investigative and discovery costs and
court costs) and damages and injuries (including, without limitation, injuries to persons, loss of
life, damage to tangible or intangible property or rights or economic loss, whenever occurring)
arising out of or caused in whole or in part by the acts, errors or omissions of Developer or its
agents, employees, servants, or their contractors, subconsultants of any tier, or subcontractors of
any tier, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or for whose acts they may be liable,
in the design and construction of the Developer Improvements, the Property and/or adjacent
property or any improvements thereon (as applicable), specifically excluding, however, all
claims incurred in a material way as a result of or arising out of(i)the gross negligence or willful
conduct of the Indemnitee and its agents, servants and employees, and (ii) the breach of the
Indemnitee's obligations hereunder. This indemnification obligation is intended to include,
without limitation, the indemnification of Indemnitees for damages apportioned to any one or
more of them in cases of comparative negligence or fault, where any portion of such damages is
also apportioned to Developer or its agents, employees, servants, consultants, contractors,
subconsultants of any tier, or subcontractors of any tier, or anyone directly or indirectly
employed by them or for whose acts they may be liable.
4.2Defense. Developer shall defend all suits brought upon such claims and shall pay all
costs and expenses incidental thereto.
4.3No Affect on Other Rights. This obligation to indemnify shall not be construed to
negate, abridge or otherwise reduce other rights or obligations of indemnity which may
otherwise exist in favor of the Indemnitees.
4.4Coverage. This obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall remain
effective notwithstanding the completion of Developer Improvements, and shall apply to
damages and injuries discovered before and after the issuance of the Certificate of Completion
for a period of two years. In claims against the Indemnitees by an employee of Developer, or its
agents, employees, servants, consultants, subconsultants of any tier or subcontractors of any tier,
or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them or anyone for whose acts they may be liable,
the indemnification obligation under this Section shall not be limited by any limitation on the
Page 8
857293.4
amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for Developer or its agents, .
employees, servants, consultants, subconsultants of any tier or subcontractors of any tier, under
workers' or workman's compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefits
acts. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the indemnity and obligation to defend
and hold harmless shall extend to:
(a)Design and/or construction by or through Developer of the Developer
Improvements or any other work or thing done in, on or about the Property or adjacent
property (if applicable), or a part thereof;
(b)During the term hereof, any use,non-use, possession, occupation, construction,
alteration, repair, condition, operation or maintenance of the Property or adjacent
property (if applicable), or improvements thereon by or through Developer, or any
nuisance made or suffered thereon or any failure by Developer to keep the Property,
adjacent property (if applicable), or improvements thereon or of any street, alley, parking
area or facility, sidewalk, curb, vault,passageway, gutter, tunnel, bridge or space
comprising a part thereof in a safe condition;
(c)Any fire, accident, injury (including death) or damage to any person or
property occurring, in, on or about the Property or adjacent property (if applicable) or
improvements thereon or any part thereof or in, on or about any street, alley, parking area
or facility, sidewalk, curb, vault, passageway, gutter, tunnel, bridge or space comprising a
part thereof; and AMNON
(d)Any lien or claim which may be alleged to have arisen against or on the
Property, or improvements thereon or any part thereof or any of the assets of, or funds
appropriated to, Agency, or any liability which may be asserted against Agency with
respect thereto.
ARTICLE 5
Transfer: Financial Encumbrances
5.1 Prohibition Against Transfer of Property. Developer Improvements and Assignment
of Agreement. Prior to the issuance by Agency of the Certificate of Completion, Developer shall
not, without the prior written approval of Agency (which may be withheld in its absolute
discretion) (i) sell. transfer, or convey directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the Property
or the buildings or structures thereon or (ii)transfer, assign or convey this Agreement or
Developer's obligations hereunder; provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing,
Developer shall be entitled to (A) enter into reservation agreements, pre-sale agreements,
purchase and sale agreements, leases and other similar agreements with respect to portions of the
Property so long as such agreements are documented on forms previously approved by Agency,
and (B) sell residential units pursuant to bona fide sales to third parties. Developer shall not
permit any change in the general partner(s), if applicable, or in the ownership of or with respect
to the parties which own an interest in Developer on the date hereof, prior to the issuance of
Certificate of Completion for the Developer Improvements, without the prior written consent of
Apipsk
Agency, which consent may be withheld in its absolute discretion. These prohibitions shall not
Page 9
857293.4
be deemed to prevent the granting of utility easements or permits to facilitate the construction of
the Developer Improvements.
5.2Encumbrances. Except pursuant to the Construction Financing, no mortgages, deeds
of trust, or other forms of conveyance required for any financing shall be permitted before the
issuance of Certificate of Completion for the Developer Improvements.
ARTICLE 6
Defaults and Remedies
6.1 Default. It shall be an event of default under this Agreement by Developer (an"Event
of Default") if Developer shall fail to perform any of its duties or obligations hereunder at the
time for performance set forth herein or if Developer shall default in its obligations under any of
the covenants and conditions contained in Covenants First through Seventh in the Reverter
Agreement, and thereafter fails to cure such default within twenty (20) days of its receipt of a
written notice of default from Agency; provided, however, that in the event that the nature of
such default is such that more than twenty (20) days are reasonably required for its cure, then
such default will not be deemed to be an Event of Default if Developer shall commence such
cure within such twenty (20) days period and shall thereafter diligently prosecute such cure to
completion; provided, further, that the maximum additional time to complete such cure shall be
sixty (60) days (eighty (80) days in total), unless and for the time period that such cure is
impossible because of an Event of Force Majeure. Following an Event of Default, Agency shall
have all remedies at law or in equity, which shall include the right to restrain by injunction any
violation or threatened violation and by decree to compel specific performance of any terms,
covenants or conditions of this Agreement, it being agreed that the remedy at law for any breach
of any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement is not adequate.
6.2Right to Cure. Should Developer fail to timely perform any of the obligations set
forth in this Agreement and thereafter fail to diligently commence performing any of such
obligations within twenty (20) days of its receipt of Agency's written demand therefor, and
diligently and continuously pursue such performance to completion, Agency, its successors and
assigns, shall, in addition to any other remedy provided at law or in this Agreement, have the
right (but not the obligation) to perform such obligation on behalf of Developer, and Developer
shall reimburse Agency, its successors and assigns, for the actual cost of performing such work
within ten (10) days after receipt of billing therefor and proof of payment thereof. In the event
Developer does not reimburse the Agency or its successors and assigns within such ten (10)
days, Agency, its successors or assigns, shall have (i) the right to exercise any and all rights
which Agency, its successors or assigns, might have at law to collect the same, and (ii) have a
lien on the Property to the extent of the amount paid by Agency, its successors or assigns. but not
reimbursed by Developer, which amount shall bear interest at a rate equal to the then published
"Prime Rate" of Citibank, N.A., plus two percent (2%) per annum (the "Interest Rate") (the
Parties acknowledging that such rate may not be the lowest or "best"rate), or the highest legal
rate of interest, whichever is less, from the date of billing until paid. Such lien may be filed for
record as a claim against Developer, in the form required by law, in the Salt Lake County
Recorder's Office, which lien shall contain at least the following information:
(a)The name of the lien claimant;
Page 10
857293.4
(b)The name of Developer;
(c)A description of the work performed on behalf of Developer and a statement
itemizing the cost thereof; and
(d)A description of the Property.
The lien so claimed shall attach from the date of recordation in the amount claimed, and it may
be enforced and foreclosed in any manner allowed by law, including, but not limited to, suits to
foreclose a mechanic's lien, trust deed or mortgage under applicable law. Such lien, when so
established against the real property described in such lien, shall be prior and superior to any
right, title, interest, lien or claim which may be or is acquired or attached to such real property
after the time of recording the claim of lien.
6.3Breach Shall Not Peiiiiit Teiiuination. No breach of this Agreement shall entitle
Developer to cancel, rescind or otherwise terminate this Agreement.
6.4No Limitation of Remedies: Sole Discretion. The various rights and remedies herein
contained, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, shall not be considered as exclusive
of any other right or remedy, but shall be construed as cumulative and shall be in addition to
every other remedy now or hereafter existing at law, in equity or by statute. No delay or
omission of the right to exercise any power or remedy shall impair any such right, power or
remedy or be construed as a waiver of any default or nonperformance or as acquiescence therein. ''"'
Developer and the successors and assigns of Developer, shall be jointly and severally liable for
any default under this Agreement; provided, any action with regard to such default may be
instituted against all or any one of them. All decisions and determinations made by Agency
under this Article 6 may be made in Agency's sole discretion.
6.5Rights of Agency on Revesting. Upon the revesting, if ever, in Agency of title to the
Property or any part thereof as provided in the Agency Deed, Agency may elect (but is not
required) to assume the Construction Contract or enter into new contract documents with a new
contractor and complete construction of the Developer Improvements or such other
improvements as it determines appropriate. Alternatively, Agency may resell such Property, in
such manner as Agency shall find feasible and consistent with applicable law to a qualified and
responsible party or parties as deteiiuined by Agency, who will assume the obligation of making
or completing the Developer Improvements, or such other improvements in their stead, as shall
be satisfactory to Agency and in accordance with the uses specified for the Property. Upon such
election or upon such resale of the Property, as the case may be,the following requirements shall
be satisfied:
(a)First, except as otherwise provided in Section 1.1(h) of that certain Qualified
Exchange Accommodation Agreement of even date herewith among RJH, Ltd.,
Marmalade H&J, LLC, Metro National Exchange Services, Inc. and Agency, and except
as otherwise provided in Section 1.1(h) of that certain Qualified Exchange
Accommodation Agreement of even date herewith among Howa Capital, LLC,
Matnialade K, LLC, Metro National Exchange Services, Inc. and Agency, any loan
Page 11
857293.4
secured by a mortgage or deed of trust permitted by the Development Agreement, if any,
shall be paid in full or assumed.
(b)Second, Agency shall be entitled to reimburse Agency, on its own behalf, or on
behalf of Salt Lake City, for all costs and expenses of Agency incident to the sale and/or
conveyance of the Property, for all costs and expenses incurred by Agency (excluding
salaries to personnel) in connection with the exercise of Agency's rights hereunder and in
the management and resale of the Property (but less any income derived by Agency from
the Property in connection with such management); all taxes, assessments, and water,
sewer and other utility charges with respect to the Property; any payments made or
necessary to be made to discharge any existing encumbrances or liens, or prevent from
attaching or being made any subsequent encumbrances or liens due to obligations,
defaults or acts of the Developer or any expenditures made or obligations incurred with
respect to the making or completion of the Developer Improvements or any part thereof
on the Property or portion thereof; and any amounts otherwise owing Agency by
Developer; and
(c)Third, Developer shall be entitled to a reimbursement in an amount equal to the
sum of:
(1) the purchase price in cash actually received by Agency by Developer for the
Property (or allocable to the portion thereof); plus
(2) the costs reasonably incurred by Developer in connection with the
construction of any of the Developer Improvements existing on the Property at the
time of the reentry and repossession (including the fees paid to the Architect for
preparing the Final Construction Documents, to Developer's engineers and to
design development and construction professionals whose work product Agency
concludes creates value for the Development Improvements, such conclusion not
to be unreasonably withheld, but excluding all other soft costs and other expenses
incurred by Developer in connection with the development of the Developer
Improvements and the costs of personnel of Developer, if and to the extent that
Agency determines such existing Developer Improvements may be used in
completing the construction of the remaining Developer Improvements or may be
used in completing any other development of the Property as determined by
Agency (such determinations to be made on a reasonable basis).
Any balance remaining after such reimbursement shall be retained by Agency.
6.6Reversion of Zoning. At any time after Agency acquires the Property the Agency
determines that it will not pursue completion of the Developer improvements, the zoning for the
Property will revert back to its zoning prior to the PUD Approval by the City.
6.7Agencv Default. Agency shall be deemed to be in default hereunder in the event
Agency shall, for any reason other than Developer's default, fail to meet, comply with, or
perform any covenant, agreement; or obligation on its part required within the time limits
(including applicable cure periods) and the manner required in this Agreement. In the event
Page 12
857293.4
Agency shall be deemed to be in default hereunder, Developer may, at its sole and exclusive
remedy, obtain specific performance of, or a writ of mandamus to compel performance of, such
duties.
ARTICLE 7
Mortgagee Protection
7.1 Definitions. As used in this Agreement, each of the following terms shall have the
indicated meaning:
(a)"Mortgage" means a mortgage, or a deed of trust, or other security agreement
recorded in the Official Records.
(b)''Mortgagee" means the mortgagee under a mortgage, the beneficiary under a
deed of trust or the secured party under any security agreement recorded with respect to
the Property or any portion thereof in the Official Records.
(c)"Official Records" means the official records of the Salt Lake County
Recorder, State of Utah.
(d)"Qualified Mortgagee" means a Mortgagee of which Agency has been given
written notice, including such Mortgagee's name and address.
7.2Obligations of Mortgagee. Unless and until it enters into possession or acquires title
pursuant to foreclosure or any arrangement or proceeding in lieu of foreclosure, any Qualified
Mortgagee shall have no obligation to take any action to comply with, and may not be compelled
to take any action to comply with, this Agreement.
7.3Notices: Right to Cure. On delivering to Developer any notice, demand or other
communication pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, Agency shall at the same time
deliver copies of such notice to each Qualified Mortgagee at the latest address provided to
Agency by such Qualified Mortgagee. Although otherwise effective with respect to Developer,
no notice delivered to Developer shall affect any rights or remedies of a Qualified Mortgagee
unless a copy of such notice has been delivered to such Qualified Mortgagee in accordance with
the immediately preceding sentence. Each Qualified Mortgagee shall have the right to remedy a
default, or cause the same to be remedied within the time allowed to Developer.
7.4Performance. A Qualified Mortgagee shall have the right to act for and in the place of
Developer to the extent permitted by the applicable Mortgage or otherwise agreed to by
Developer in writing. Agency shall accept performance by or on behalf of a Qualified
Mortgagee as if the same had been performed by Developer. A Qualified Mortgagee shall have
the right, to the extent Developer agrees in writing, to appear in a legal action or proceeding on
behalf of Developer in connection with the Property.
7.5Recoanition. Within 30 days of a written request therefor together with evidence as
Agency may reasonably require that a proposed Qualified Mortgagee in fact meets the Amikik
requirements of a Qualified Mortgagee as set forth herein, Agency agrees to execute,
Page 13
857293.4
acknowledge and deliver to such Qualified Mortgagee an instrument stating that such Qualified
Mortgagee is a"Qualified Mortgagee" entitled to the benefits of this Article 7.
7.6Estoppel Certificate. Within ten(10) days after a written request by Developer, a
Qualified Mortgagee or a proposed Qualified Mortgagee, and upon payment of Agency's
reasonable out-of-pocket legal costs incurred in connection with the issuance thereof, Agency
shall issue a certificate confirming or not confirming if not accurate:
(a)that this Agreement is in full force and effect;
(b)the unpaid amount of Developer's Reimbursement Cap;
(c)that to Agency's knowledge no default(or event which with the giving of
notice or passage of time, or both) exists on the part of Developer or Agency under this
Agreement;
(d)that no change or modification of this Agreement shall be made without the
written consent of Mortgagee;
(e)that Agency shall provide Mortgagee with a copy of all notices including,
without limitation, notices of default sent to Developer; and
(f)such other matters pertaining to this Agreement as may reasonably be
requested.
The Person requesting the certificate shall be entitled to rely on the certificate.
ARTICLE 8
General Provisions
8.1 Captions. The captions, headings, and arrangements used in this Agreement are for
convenience only and do not in any way affect, limit, amplify, or modify the terms and
provisions hereof.
8 2Number and Gender of Words. Whenever herein the singular number is used, the
same shall include the plural where appropriate, and words of any gender shall include each
other gender where appropriate.
83Attornevs' Fees. In any legal or equitable proceeding for the enforcement of, or to
restrain the violation of, or otherwise pertaining to a dispute concerning this Agreement or any
provision hereof, by reference or otherwise, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to an award of
reasonable attorneys' fees in such amount as may be fixed by the court in such proceedings, in
addition to costs of suit. If counsel is otherwise employed to enforce this Agreement or any
provision hereof, the Party forced to take action that does not involve litigation shall be entitled
to its reasonable attorneys' fees.
8.4Notices. All notices, demands, requests and other communications required or
permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be deemed to be delivered, whether actually
Page 14
857293.4
received or not, three (3) days after deposit in a regularly maintained receptacle for the United
States mail, registered or certified, or another commercially acceptable means requiring a return
receipt, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
If to Developer: Marmalade H&J, LLC
Marmalade K, LLC
663 West 100 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84104
Attention: Corporate Counsel
With a copy to: David Broadbent
Holland & Hart
60 East South Temple, 42000
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
If to Agency: Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City
Attn: Executive Director
451 South State Street, 4418
P.O. Box 145518
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5518
oiniN
With a copy to: Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough, P.C.
170 South Main Street, Suite 1500
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Attention: Tom Berggren
Upon at least ten days prior written notice, each Party shall have the right to change its address to
any other address within the United States of America.
8.5Governine Law. This Agreement is intended to be performed in the State of Utah, and
the laws of Utah shall govern the validity, construction, enforcement, and interpretation of this
Agreement, unless otherwise specified herein.
8.6Approvals and Consents. Whenever either Party is obligated to not unreasonably
withhold an approval or consent hereunder, such Party shall also not unreasonably delay or
condition such approval or consent.
8.7Entiretv and Amendments. This Agreement, together with the Purchase Agreement,
embodies the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes any prior agreements and
understandings, if any, relating to the Property, and may be amended or supplemented only by an
instrument in writing executed by both Agency and Developer.
8.8Invalid Provisions. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable under present or future laws, such provision shall be fully severable; this
Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable provision
Page 15
857293.4
had never comprised a part of this Agreement; and the remaining provisions of this Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable provision or by its severance from this Agreement.
8.9Further Acts. In addition to the acts and deeds recited herein and contemplated to be
performed, executed and delivered by Agency and Developer, Agency and Developer agree to
perform, execute and deliver or cause to be performed, executed, and delivered any and all such
further acts, deeds and assurances as may be necessary to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby.
8.10Survival. Except as otherwise provided for herein, all agreements, covenants,
representations and warranties contained herein shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement and the performance by Developer of its obligations hereunder.
8.11 Warranty against Payment of Consideration for Agreement. The Developer
represents and warrants that neither it nor any of its members, managers, employees or officers
has: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to Salt Lake City ("City") or an Agency officer or
employee or former City or Agency officer or employee, or his or her relative or business entity;
(2) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a
commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona
fide commercial selling agencies for the purpose of security business; (3) knowingly breached
any of the ethical standards set forth in the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44,
Salt Lake City Code; or (4) knowingly influenced, and hereby promises that it will not
knowingly influence, a City officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth
in the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City Code.
8.12Nonliability of Agency Officials and Employees. No member, official or employee
of Agency shall be personally liable to Developer, or any successor in interest, in the event of
any default or breach by Agency or for any amount which may become due to Developer or its
successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.
8.l3Recordation. At Agency's election, this Agreement or a memorandum of this
Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Salt Lake County Recorder.
8.14No Relationship of Principal and Agent. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor
any acts of the Parties shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and
agent or of limited or general partnership or of joint venture or of any other similar association
between Agency, its successors or assigns, or Developer, its successors or assigns.
8.15No Presumption. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed only by the
contents hereof and there shall be no presumption or standard of construction in favor of or
against either Party.
8.16Exhibits. All references to Exhibits contained herein are references to exhibits
attached hereto, all of which are made a part hereof for all purposes.
Page 16
857293.4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed
as of the date first above written.
REDEVELOPM• '' 1GENCY OF SALT LAKE CITY
By /, _•'
Ralph :ecker
Its Chief Administrative;- fficer
By Ile—
D.J. Bax r-.—
Its Executive Director
Approved as to legal form:
Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough, P.C.
By: \
DEVELOPER
MARMALADE H&J, LLC
By Metro National Exchange Services, Inc.
Bya �-�_
Name: R a ,,- L fiee,,. �
Its �14-Le-1, / -1
MARMALADE K, LLC
By Metro Nato yl Exchange Services, Inc.
Name: ,c, J 4-.1 J /ik
Its ()Nen ti
t
Page 18
857293.4
STATE OF UTAH )
: ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
On the day of October, 2008,personally appeared before me Ralph Becker, who
being by me duly sworn did say he is the Chief Administrative Officer of The Redevelopment
Agency of Salt Lake City, and that the whin and foregoing instrument was signed on behalf of
said Agency. j i i F n i
' //,, //) ,
liein (I
NOTARY PUB I.0 t 7 ,,i),
Residing at: i/ /l.'VVIl 1..I
My Commission Expires: 1
S -TGCFUii;; i
=i'; Sr;Cuu m,._ ccDir", i
STATE OF UTAH ) -' "'" 2.J°9
' :,=i' CA -2i;-,j S C ,21,
1 -r ,
SS. r`'..;�;/ 15 ze L S .��iE�•'Tc2r.JL'li".G1'�
1 — S A.°Cq ' Utn 84111
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE y _
On the /tl day of October, 2008, personally appeared before me D.J. Baxter, who
being by me duly sworn did say he is the Executive Director of The Redevelopment Agency of
Salt Lake City, and that the within and for going instrument was signed on behalf of said f • -�;:`
Agency. j I a�. '
�.1i 11( jp I ; ,
NOTARY PUFLIC 1/7"3/0(''1, -
1 L�
Residing at: 6/,` / 1-91/t1 1- - �-
r:.N�,5 p-C7-U�7 p
My Commission Expires: ` 'A n.
': '.}:��`,.., e.-._. x ;::10tar)1"-UQli-'i J �• yr- ��n.~'7;
STATE OF UTAH ) i pp`; ' . ray_g a.ro .y�,, 1 ''
};i a:�j J sail Lska Ci v,Utah 8�111
: ss. i'�`v,,,.was' `,,�7 My Commission Expiry: a
�''. Via`' March 12,2011
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) -.2o. ' _,�«t. of Utah
On the 5 day of October, 2008 personally appeared before me ).,-a .c- ... .. .
who being by me duly sworn did say that he is the President of Metro National Exchange
Services, Inc., a Utah corporation, which is the Manager of Marmalade H&J, LLC, a Utah
limited liability company, and that the within and foregoing instrument was signed on behalf of
said limited liability company.
,-2,- , )-' '!
NOTARY PUBLICf
Residing at: 5 �', -{=- -----
My Commission Expires:
Page 19
857293.4
��pF YkE� Notary Public
1 _;1 , ERICH L.TELFORD 1
g _ . 345 East Broadway 5
STATE OF UTAH )
S 5 ' Batt Lake City,Utah 84111
SS. ''y�',jai- '4 1
My Commission Expires
March 12,2011 9
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) Wm WMA Wei State Of Utah
On the 3 day of October, 2008 personally appeared before me(7.),,,,,,,, ,1-. A ,,,;;;,,,.,
who being by me duly sworn did say that he is the President of Metro National Exchange
Services, Inc., a Utah corporation, which is the Manager of Marmalade K, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company, and that the within and foregoing instrument was signed on behalf of said
limited liability company.
N&IARY PUBLIC J-`6
Residing at: .(7,.% :/ ___ _
My Commission Expires:
Page 20
857293.4
EXHIBIT A ,
(To Development Agreement)
Legal Descriptions
Building H&J Property
Parcel No. 1:
Beginning at a point of the East line of Block 133, Plat"A", Salt Lake City Survey, said point
being North 18.33 feet from the Northeast corner of Lot 7 of said Block 133; thence South
220 feet along said East line to a point which is South 36.67 feet from the Southeast corner of
said Lot 7; thence West 148.5 feet; thence North 73.33 feet; thence East 17 feet; thence North
146.67 feet; thence East 131.5 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel No. 2:
Commencing 17-7/9 rods North of the Southeast corner of Block 133, Plat "A", Salt Lake City
Survey; and running thence West 131-1/2 feet; thence South 36-2/3 feet; thence East
131-1/2 feet; thence North 36-2/3 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel No. 3:
Commencing 54.99 feet North of the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 133, Plat"A", Salt Lake '"
City Survey; and running thence North 36-2/3 feet; thence West 8 rods; thence South 36-2/3 feet;
thence East 8 rods to the place of beginning.
Parcel No. 4:
Commencing 179.716 feet North of the Southeast corner of Block 133, Plat"A", Salt Lake City
Survey; and running thence North 40.284 feet; thence West 131-1/2 feet; thence South
40.284 feet; thence East 131-1/2 feet to beginning.
Parcel No. 5:
Beginning 8-7/18 rods North of the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 133, Plat "A", Salt Lake
City Survey; and running thence North 41.3 feet; thence West 131-1/2 feet; thence South
41.3 feet; thence East 131-1/2 feet to the place of beginning.
Building K Property
08-36-204-019: Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Lot 6, Block 133, Plat A, Salt Lake City
Survey; thence South 73 feet 4 inches; thence West 131 feet 6 inches; thence North 73 feet 4
inches; thence East 131 feet 6 inches to the point of beginning.
08-36-204-020: Beginning 4 4/9 rods South of the Northeast corner of Block 133, Plat A, Salt
Lake City Survey; thence South 33 feet; thence West 131 1/3 feet; thence North 33 feet; thence
East 131 1/3 feet to the point of beginning.
Exhibit A - Page 1
S57293.4
08-36-204-021: Beginning 106.333 feet South and 131.33 feet West from the Northeast corner of
Lot 6, Block 133, Plat A, Salt Lake City Survey; thence South 7.34 feet; thence West 16.67 feet;
thence North 7.34 feet; thence East 16.67 feet to the point of beginning.
08-36-204-022: Beginning 6 4/9 rods South of the Northeast corner of Block 133, Plat A, Salt
Lake City Survey; thence South 40.34 feet, more or less; thence West 148 feet; thence North 33
feet; thence East 16 2/3 feet; thence North 7.34 feet; thence East 131 1/3 feet to the point of
beginning.
Exhibit A - Page 2
857293.4
EXHIBIT B
(To Development Agreement)
Description of Developer Improvements
The project consists of the construction of three buildings and related site improvements on the
west side of 300 West and in between 500 and 600 north, as follows:
Sitework:
The work that will be completed under this phase includes but is not limited to improvements in
the public right-of-way along 500 north, 300 west and 600 north on the west side of 300 West. It
will also include the installation of site utilities, light poles, curb and gutter, asphalt paving,
excavation for footings and foundations, and other related items.
Building H: 4,670 SF of leaseable space (2,480 restaurant,2,190 retail).
Building J: 3,290 SF of leaseable retail space.
The work includes but is not limited to (2) single story grey shell retail buildings. Each structure
consists of structural CMU block walls and open web steel joists. The exterior finish will be brick '.1"
veneer, metal panel, and aluminum storefront.
Building K: 15,635 SF of leaseable space (4,520 SF restaurant, 2,535 SF retail, 8,580 SF
office).
The work includes but is not limited to a two (2) story grey shell retail/office building. The
structure consists of a structural CMU block wall with steel columns. The floor is metal
deck and concrete at level two. The exterior finishes include brick veneer, metal panel, and
aluminum storefront.
97 parking stalls.
Exhibit B —Page 1
857293.4
EXHIBIT C
(To Development Agreement)
Site Plan
u'-r K•r
.- r'-r ,r
:_� tW?I.11.
1 .1,: 1 0
h
•:ilia• 1= �Di. u
aar
1. a A�
: :: J � CII
Ci ��
4S1 a •
7
iiigim
ti ��
_.1. ao _ "elw
I�.. L a— •1sim ; ,
v`► �
VI
O _ r NI
1,
A'N
(iiiikt.:' - _- ____=1
Exhibit C—Page 1
857293.4
cso
t_n
---:
.0
t...-/
le.
Marmalade Development Schedule
ID 'Task Name 1 Duration l Start Predecessors: rrnish % ! :2009 .
0 . Qomolele .,i 'J I A.i.S..:0. 1.i Pi.-1..1.F.i M:A 1•M 1.4"[A 1.AL s..
i ..—-inn';i-§rei-,;Buildingsii,Jr/C..-- -----J.-- 2gcfay- '... tu;3-711 51/08 • Men aii 7169 - . W.-i--App• 4,
Schematic Design 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% 4> 7/15
1
Owner/RDA Plan Revrew SD's 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 4) 7/15
Design Development 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%' 4) 7/15
,
Owner/RDA Plan Review DO'S 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Toe 7/15/08 100%; 4) 7/15
6 Construction Documents 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tire 7/15/08 100%; 4.7/15
Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% 4 7/15 (i)
rri 1 •-•
>< Permit Set Preperation 0 days Tue 7/15/09 Tue 7/15/08 100%i 4> 7/15 roc2,
.--•• : •
Plan Check 0 days Tue 7i15/08 Tr re 7/15/08 100%! 4> 7115 0
11,Ci ---16- s/ Bidding and Procurement 0 days Tue 7/15/08 I
Tue 7/15/08 100%1 4b., 7115 e-e,
IC)
I i ' a
i
.0 <
Response to City Comments 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 4 7/15 (0
AD
GO a
cD
12 Construction 238 days Thu 9/18/08 Mon 13/17/03 0%j 171111=11111:111111312111MMIIIMIIMMINSIMM,
S
1--,
1 1 CD
13 n Start Construction 180 days Thu 9/18/08 Wed 5/27/09 0%I .
I IL
,--,
1 .
1 '
14 Certificate of OccUpanc-y 58 days, Thu 5/28/09 13 Mon 8117/09 0%i ' '
1 ,
. .: . ___
• 0
(0
Task i ! Milestone ' External Tasks
CD
Project.Marmalade WEST Developmf SplitSummaryN?'ml'—rn 9l External Milestone 4. 0
Date:Thu 7/10/08 !-0
Progress =15====1 Project Summary Trig="1=1=747.571 Deadline
CD
Page 1
,,,4t21
Cict
,-1 =
to 1--I
to
CD H
=
)
CO
t0
1,3
Marmalade Development Schedule
ID ;Task Name ; Duration Start Finish %Complete i J I j
i �--� .. .i ,2 0 � � 2010
9
14 iSjOrNiD;JIF MIAIM J,-'J A1S;OjN DiJ_ _A-M_J1JIA'S
1 Site Work Per Approved Permit 534 days? Tue 7/15/08 Fri 7/30/10 68% „ '.`
2 Schematic Design 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%i 40.
3 Owner/RDA Plan Review SD's 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%i 4p.. 7/15
4 Design Development 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 4t* 7/15
5 I Owner/RDA Plan Review DD'S 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 411, 7/15
6 Construction Documents 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%j 4 7/15
Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%1 .0. 7/15
8---I Permit Set Preperation 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%1 7/1 5
//
9 Plan Check 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% • 7/15
10 Bidding and Procurement 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I .4). 7/15
11 l Response to City Comments 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 4. 7/15
rn
- 12- I
Construction 360 days? Mon 3/16/09 Fd 7/30/10 .68%
'C.I -13 Start Construction 355 days? Mon 3/16/09 Fri 7/23/10 68% 1 h
.-1., 14 Turnover K Closeout 5 days Mon 7/26/10 Fri 7/30/10 0% j l p
--t 5I Certificate of Occupancy 0 days Fri 7/30/10 Fri 7/30/10 0% If 7/
16 Construction
--� Complete Cotruction 0 days Fri 7/30/10 Fri 7/30/10 0% 7/
CM 17
N18 East Side Mlxod-Uso 0 543 days Tvo 7/15/08 Thu 8/12/10 0% ,` .
19 Schematic Design 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%j 4> 7/15
20 Owner/RDA Plan Review SD's 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% /4 7/15
21 1 Design Development 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% Ip 7/15
2 --1 Plan Review DO'S 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% 40,„ 7/15
23 1 Construction Documents 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%; 4 7/15
24 Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 5 days Fri 1/16/09 Thu 1/22/09 0%
25 Permit Set Preperation 10 days Fri 1/23/09 Thu 2/5/09 0%
Task I I Milestone ® Extemal Tasks I �` l r `.irr✓Gr�bT E
Project:Marmalade EAST Developme Split Summa External Milestone
Date:Thu 7/10/08 „,„, ...,.,.„.-.,..,, ry
Progress Project Summary 1,52151M121111, Deadline
Page 1
0O
In
N
w
.A
Marmalade Development Schedule
ID I Task Name Durationy Start ! Finish ! %Complete LJIJ:AS OIN'D'JOF;M_;A'M.JJjA:S 0 NjDIJ F;M'AIM JjJ;A_S�
26 Financing 180 days Tue 7/15/08 /23/0 !----- 1 . -.J i Mon 3/23109 0%� I
27 Plan Check 30 days Mon 12/15/08 Fri 1/23/09 0%I
1
28 Bidding and Procurement 30 days Fri 2/6/09 Thu 3/19/09 0%
I
29 Response to City Comments 10 days Mon 1/26/09 Fri 2/6109 0% I
30 Construction 330 days Fri 3/20/09 Thu 6/24/10 0%1!
31 J Turnover&Closeout 30 days Fri 6/25/10 Thu 8/5/10 0%1 L l
y
32 Certificate of Occupancy 5 days Fri 8/6/10 Thu 8/12/10 0%; O
33
34 East Side Mixed-Use A 539 days Tue 7/15/08 Fri 8/6/10 0%1 %
--35 Schematic Design 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%1 40. 7115
36 Design Development • 30 days Wed 12/17/08 Tue 1/27/09 0%
I i
X37 .I Owner/RDA Plan Review DD'S 5 days Wed 1/28/09 Tue 2/3/09 0%I 1-1�
38 1 Construction Documents 45 days Wed 2/4/09 Tue 4/7/09 0%ICr I
n1
e=* 39 I Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 5 days Wed 4/8/09 Tue 4/14/09 0%I i Ul
40 I Permit Set Preperation 8 days Wed 4115f09 Fri 4/24/09 0
41 i Financing 180 days Tue 7/15/08 Mon 3/23/09 0%
1) 42 1 Plan Check 45 days. Mon 4/27/09 Fri 6/26/09 0%' .
(IQ _
CD 43 Bidding and Procurement 30 days Mon 4/27/09 Fri 6/5/09 0%
tom..)
44 1 Response to City Comments 5 days Mon 6/29/09 Fri 7/3/09 0%
45—� Construction 250 days Mon 7/6/09 Fri 6/18/10 0% I
46 I Turnover&Closeout 30 days Mon 6/21/10 Fri 7/30/10 0%i
47 I Certificate of Occupancy 5 days Mon 8/2/10 Fri 8/6/10 0%I ,
49 East Side Retail B 546 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 8117110 0% Ili
50 Schematic Design 0 clays Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100% .4, 7/15
Task I I Milestone ® External Tasks '. .S,t„
Pla
Project:Marmalade EAST Developme Split Summary External Milestone 4
Date:Thu 7/10/06
Progress ISMISESSINtall=11 Project Summary Deadline
Page 2
„1
1, ) % ) )
00
4 — --
Marmalade Development Schedule
ID 'Task Name Duration Start f Inr;h %Complete 2009 :2010
_ _ _ J,J A:S OIN,D J F M iM;A. J J;AjS;O N D�'J'F:M.AIM JJ.A Si,
51 Design Development 30 days Mon 2/23/09 Fri 4/3/09 . - 0% f' 1—1
II I I
52 I Owner/RDA Plan Review DD'S 5 days Mon 4/6l09 Fir 4/10/09 0% _
I 1
53 Construction Documents 45 days Fri 5/22/09 Thu 7/23/09 0%! Till,
54. Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 5 days Fri 7/24/09 Thu 7/30/09 0%' Il
55 Permit Set Preperation 8 days Fri 7/31/09 Tire 8/11/09 0%, Il
50 Plan Check 45 days Wed 8/12/00 Tire 10/13/09 D%. f —11
57 Bidding and Procurement 30 days Wed 8/12/09 Tue 9/22/09 0% f
I
SA . . Response to City Comments 15 days Wed 10/14/09 Tue 11/3/09 0%, f
i
— It
59 Construction 180 days Wed 11/4/09 Tue 7/13/10 0%i f
1
I ,
60 Certificate of Occupancy 25 days Wed 7/14/10 Tire 8/17/10 0%I I-
61
tTi
>4 62 East Side Townhomos 512 days' Tue 7/15/08 Wed 6/30/10 0%1 "Et, .
63 Schematic Design 0 days Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7115/08 100%I 0 7/15
I
64 Owner/RDA Plan Review SD's 0 days I Tue 7/15/08 Tue 7/15/08 100%I 4 7/15
65. Design Development 45 days Mon 1/19/09 Fri 3/20/09 0%1 El,
6fi Owner/RDA Plan Review DO'S 5 days Mon 3/23/00 Fri 1/27/09 0%I O
OQ 67 Construction Documents 60 days. Mon 3/30/09 Fri 6f19/09 0%
cD 68 I Owner/RDA Plan Review CD's 5 days Mon G/22/09 Fri 6/26/09 0%I
69 Permit Set Preperalion 8 days Mon 6/20/09 Wed 7/8/09 0%
iliti=
70 1 Plan Check 50 days Thu 7/0/09 Wed 9/16/09 0%I
71 Bidding and Procurement 30 days Thu 7/9/09 Wed 8/19/09 0%I I
72 1 Response to City Comments 15 days Thu 9/17/09 Wed 10/7/09 0% Ul
73 1 Construction 180 days Thu 10/8/09 Wed 6/16/10 0%! ,t
74 I Certificate of Occupancy 10 days Thu 6/17/10 Wed 6/30/10 0% f}
Task I J Milestone ® External Tasks D ir�i " u,v
Project:Marmalade EAST Developme Split Summary 170110121211159P External Milestone
Date:Thu 7/10/08 ^•.^^^.• ^„.,.......^
Progress cv.m+_^r.�... ...asmsm+.J Project Summary Deadline
Page 3
.7 i i
EXHIBIT E
(To Development Agreement)
Index Sheet of Final Construction Documents
NOWA
HOWA CONSTRUCTION
EXHIBIT A:
Building H:
I. Project Specification manual titled"Marmalade-A Multi-Use Project"dated
October 2,2006.
H. Drawings titled"Marmalade Building H Permit/Bid Set""535 North 300 West Salt
Lake City,Utah Phase 2"
a. Addendum#1-April 18,2007
b. Addendum#2—April 24,2007
c. Addendum#3—July 161 2007
d. Addendum#4—July 27th 2007
e. Addendum#5—July 27th 2007
f. Memo—August 17,2007 RE:CMU Color
BUILDING H SHEETS
ARCHITECTURAL
T.1 TITLE SHEET,VICINITY PLAN,INDEX,ABBREVIATIONS,GENERAL NOTES
Al.l MAIN FLOOR PLAN,TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Al.2 ' N,
ROOF PLAN&DETAILS
A3.1 WALL SECTIONS
A4.1 DOOR/WINDOW SCHEDULE&DETAILS STRUCTURAL
S 101 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
S201 FOOTING&FOUNDATION PLAN,ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S301 SCHEDULES
S501 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION DETAILS S701 ROOF FRAMING DETAILS
MECHANICAL
M001 TITLE SHEET,LEGEND&ABBREVIATIONS
Iv1201 BUILDING I MECHANICAL FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
M501 MECHANICAL DETAILS
M701 IvIECFLANICAL SCHEDULES PLUMBING
P201 BUILDING J PLUMBING FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
P501 PLUMBING DETAILS
P701 PLUMBING SCHEDULES
ELECTRICAL E0.1 BUILDING J FLOOR PLAN-ELECTRICAL
E1.1 BUILDING I ELECTRICAL-POWER&LIGHTING PLANS
CIVIL
C0.00 CIVIL COVER SHEET
C0.01 CIVIL LEGEND AND NOTES
C0.02 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITY STANDARD NOTES
C1.00 OVERALL SITE PLAN
C2.00 OVERALL EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2.02 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
(WEST)
C4.00 OVERALL SUE UTILITY PLAN
C5.01 CIVIL DETAILS
C5.02 STORIvITECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
C5.03 STORMTECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
C5.04 APWA DETAILS
C5.05 UDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE
1 9/29/2008
Exhibit E—Page 1
857293.4
NOWA
LP.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
LP.2 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS
LI.I LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
LI.2 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
LH.1 LANDSCAPE HARDSCAPE PLAN
LH.2 LANDSCAPE HARDSCAPE DETAILS
Building J:
III. Project Specifications titled`Building J"dated April 7,2007;Project
IV. "Marmalade Building J PermitBid Set""555 North 300 West Salt Lake City,Utah
Phase 2"
a. Addendum#1-April 18,2007
b. Addendum#2—April24,2007
c. Addendum#3—July 16th 2007
d. Addendum#4—July 27th 2007
e. Addendum#5—July 27th 2007
f. Memo—August 17,2007 RE:CMU Color
BUILDING J SHEETS:
ARCHITECTURAL
T.1 TITLE SHEET,VICINITY PLAN,INDEX,ABBREVIATIONS,GENERAL NOTES
A 1.1 M ALN FLOOR PLAN,TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A 1.2
ROOF PLAN&DETAILS
A3.1 WALL SECTIONS
A4.1 DOOR/WM/DOW SCHEDULE&DETAILS STRUCTURAL
S 101 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
S201 FOOTING&FOUNDATION PLAN,ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S301 SCHEDULES
S501 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION DETAILS S701 ROOF FRAMING DETAILS
MECHANICAL
M001 TITLE SHEET,LEGEND&ABBREVIATIONS
M201 BUILDING J MECHANICAL FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
M501 MECHANICAL DETAILS
M701 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES PLUMBING
P201 BUILDING J PLUMBING FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
P501 PLUMBING DETAILS
P701 PLUMBING SCHEDULES
ELECTRICAL E0.1 BUILDING J FLOOR PLAN-ELECTRICAL
E 1.1 BUILDING J ELECTRICAL-POWER&LIGHTING PLANS
CIVIL
C0.00 CIVIL COVER SHEET
C0.01 CIVIL LEGEND AND NOTES
C0.02 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITY STANDARD NOTES
C 1.00 OVERALL SITE PLAN
C2.00 OVERALL EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2.02 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
(WEST)
C4.00 OVERALL SITE UTILITY PLAN
C5.01 CIVIL DETAILS
C5.02 STORMTECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
9/29/2008
Exhibit E—Page 2
857293.4
NOWA
C5.03 STORMTECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
C5.04 APWA DETAILS
C5.05 UDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS LANDSCAPE
LP.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
LP.2 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS
LI.1 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
LI.2 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
LH.1 LANDSCAPE HARDSCAPE PLAN
LH.2 LANDSCAPE HARDSCAPE DETAILS
SITE WORK:
Project Specifications titled"Marmalade-A Mixed-Use Project"dated March 5,2007;
Project Drawings titled"Marmalade Site Work Phase 1A"-Response to RFI#8 Titled
"Response to RFI November 14,2007"
T.1 Title Sheet
A0.1 Architectural Site Plan
C0.00 Civil Cover Sheet
C0.01 Civil Legend and Notes
C0.02 Salt Lake City Public Utility Standard Notes Final Plat
C1.00 Overall Site Plan
C2.00 Overall Erosion Control Plan
C2.02 Grading and Drainage Plan '""
C2.03 Retaining Wall Plan
C3.01 300 West Street Plan and Profile(NE TBC STA. 10+00-14+00)
C3.02 300 West Street Plan and Profile(SE TBC STA.14+00-17+92)
C3.03 300 West Street Plan and Profile(NW TBC STA. 10+00-13+50)
C3.04 300 West Street Plan and Profile(SW TBC STA. 13+50-17+00)
C3.05 600 North Street Plan and Profile(S TBC STA.7+50-13+00)
C3.06 600 North Street Plan and Profile(N TBC STA.10+00-14+50)
C4.00 Overall Site Utility Plan
C4.01 On-Site Sewer Plan and Profile
C5.01 Civil Details
C5.02 Stormtech SC-740 Subsurface Storm Detention System Details
C5.03 Stormtech SC-740 Subsurface Storm Detention System Details
C5.04 APWA Standard Drawings
E0.0 Site Demo Plan
E0.1 Site Utility Plan
E0.2 Site Lighting and Power Plan
3
9/29/2008
Exhibit E-Page 3
857293.4
HOWA
September 18,2008
EXHIBIT A:
Building K:
I. Project Specifications/Manual titled"Marmalade a Multi-Use Project"dated October
2,2006
H. Drawings titled"Marmalade Building K Permit/Bid Set""535 North 300 West Salt
Lake City,Utah Phase 2"
a. Addendum#1- March 3,2008
b. Addendum#2—March 3,2008
c. Addendum#3—July 30,2008
BUILDING K SHEETS:
ARCHITECTURAL
T.1 TITLE SHEET,VICINITY PLAN,INDEX,ABBREVIATIONS,GENERAL NOTES
A0.1 SITE PLAN&DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
A1.1 MAIN FLOOR REFERENCE PLAN,TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN
A1.2 ROOF PLAN,ROOF DETAILS
A1.3 REFLECTED CEILING PLANS
A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS,EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL SCHEDULE
A3.1 BUILDING SECTIONS,WEST CANOPY FRAMING PLAN
A3.2 WALL SECTIONS,CANOPY DETAILS A3.3 WALL SECTIONS
A4.1 DOOR AND WINDOW SCHEDULE,DOOR DETAILS,WINDOW DETAILS
A4.2 DOOR DETAILS,WINDOW DETAILS A5.1 EXTERIOR DETAILS,STAIR DETAILS
A5.2 MISC.DETAILS
STRUCTURAL
S 101 GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES
S201 FOOTING&FOUNDATION PLAN
S202 FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
S203 ROOF FRAMING PLAN
S301 SCHEDULES
S501 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION DETAILS S502 FOOTING AND FOUNDATION DETAILS
S601 FLOOR FRAMING DETAILS
S701 ROOF FRAMING DETAILS
S702 ROOF FRAMING DETAILS
MECHANICAL
M001 TITLE SHEET/LEGEND&ABREVIATIONS
M201 BUILDING K FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL PLANS
M202 BUILDING K ROOF MECHANICAL PLAN
M501 MECHANICAL DETAILS
M701 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES PLUMBING
P201 BUILDING K FIRST&SECOND FLOOR PLUMBING PLANS
P202 BUILDING K ROOF&LARGE SCALE PLUMBING PLANS
P501 PLUMBING DETAILS
P701 PLUMBING SCHEDULES
ELECTRICAL
E0.1 BUILDING K FLOOR PLAN-ELECTRICAL El. BUILDING K ELECTRICAL-POWER&
LIGHTING PLANS
E2.1 BUILDING K SECOND FLOOR ELECTRICAL/POWER&LIGHITNG PLANS CIVIL
C0.00 CIVIL COVER SHEET
C0.01 CIVIL LEGEND AND NOTES
C0.02 SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITY STANDARD NOTES
9/29/2008
Exhibit E—Page 4
857293.4
HOWA
C1.00 OVERALL SITE PLAN
C2.00 OVERALL EROSION CONTROL PLAN C2.02 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN(WEST)
C4.00 OVERALL SITE UTILITY PLAN C5.01 CIVIL DETAILS
C5.02 STORM-TECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
C5.03 STORM-TECH SC-740 SUBSURFACE STORM DETENTION SYSTEM DETAILS
C5.04 APWA DETAILS
C5.05 UDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS
LANDSCAPE
LP.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
LP.2 LANDSCAPE PLANTING DETAILS
LI.1 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
LI.2 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
LH.1 LANDSCAPE HARD SCAPE PLAN
LH.2 LANDSCAPE HARD SCAPE DETAILS
SITE WORK AND PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
Project Specifications titled"Marmalade-A Mixed-Use Project"dated March 5,2007;
Project Drawings titled"Marmalade Site Work Phase 1A"-Response to RFI#8 Titled
"Response to RFI November 14,2007"
SHEETS:
T.1 Title Sheet
A0.1 Architectural Site Plan
C0.00 Civil Cover Sheet
C0.01 Civil Legend and Notes ads
C0.02 Salt Lake City Public Utility Standard Notes Final Plat
C1.00 Overall Site Plan
C2.00 Overall Erosion Control Plan
C2.02 Grading and Drainage Plan
C2.03 Retaining Wall Plan
C3.01 300 West Street Plan and Profile(NE TBC STA.10+00-14+00)
C3.02 300 West Street Plan and Profile(SE TBC STA.14+00-17+92)
C3.03 300 West Street Plan and Profile(NW TBC STA. 10+00-13+50)
C3.04 300 West Street Plan and Profile(SW TBC STA.13+50-17+00)
C3.05 600 North Street Plan and Profile(S TBC STA.7+50-13+00)
C3.06 600 North Street Plan and Profile(N TBC STA.10+00-14+50)
C4.00 Overall Site Utility Plan
C4.01 On-Site Sewer Plan and Profile
C5.01 Civil Details
C5.02 Stormtech SC-740 Subsurface Storm Detention System Details
C5.03 Stormtech SC-740 Subsurface Storm Detention System Details
C5.04 APWA Standard Drawings
E0.0 Site Demo Plan
E0.1 Site Utility Plan
E0.2 Site Lighting and Power Plan
2 9/29/2008
Exhibit E-Page 5
857293.4
BACKGROUND: On June 13, 2002, the Board approved the reuse plan and design guidelines
for the property that anticipate a mixed-use development consisting of approximately 27,000
square feet of commercial space, 65 multi-family housing units and 5-7 single family homes as
well as the renovation of the two historic structures on 500 North. In November of 2002, the
Board of Directors adopted resolution No. 557.02 approving the revised Commercial Node Term
Sheet for the parcels located at 500 North 300 West. The resolution also authorized the
preparation and distribution of a Request for Proposals.
In December 2002, the Agency issued the Request for Proposals to the public and began
marketing the parcels.
In July 2003, the Agency received three responses to the RFP. The Board rejected the proposal
from Garrison Development to develop 50 rental townhouse units and 6,000 square feet of
commercial space. The Board did not reject or enter into a 90-day exclusive right to negotiate
with Overland Developmentis proposal for 23 single-family homes, 10 attached twin-homes as
well as a 3,000 square foot commercial pad. The Board did enter into an exclusive right to
negotiate with Dan Bethel to renovate the existing nine-plea and store. Mr. Bethel later withdrew
his proposal due to economic feasibility concerns about the project.
In October 2003, the Board approved a revised Reuse Plan for the Commercial Node. The
changes included pad sites on the corners of 500 North and 600 North for neighborhood services
such as a drugstore, a bank, grocery, or hardware store. The Reuse Plan also included six
additional single-family homes, for a total of 12 single family homes, with the option for two
additional single-family homes to be located along 500 North in place of the existing nine-plex
and store. The Board also rejected the proposal submitted by Overland Development.
In December 2003, the Board approved the terms for the issuance of a Request for
Qualifications. The overall goal was to provide a mixed-use neighborhood scale commercial
center that relates to and respects the historic context of the Capitol Hill community. In
accordance with the approved Reuse Plan and Design Guidelines, the Agency offered five
parcels for development, and the sixth parcel was withheld until negotiations had been completed
with the library. The Agency added an incentive by reducing the overall asking price for all five
of the parcels to S 1,213,000 to entice a developer to purchase and develop the entire site.
In November 2004, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was issued for qualified and interested
developers to develop the Agency's property located at 500 North 300 West (Commercial Node)
and 519 North 300 West(Greek Shish Kabob) in the West Capitol Hill Project Area. The RFQ
targeted developers with commercial, retail, residential and mixed use experience, financial
capability, and required developers to describe their intention and scope of development of the
parcels. The project scope in the RFQ called for a 1-2 story commercial building, two 3-3.5
story mixed-use buildings with a preferred restaurant/retail/office use with partial underground
parking, one 1-2 story commercial building (bank), and twelve two-story single family owner
occupied homes. The RFQ stated a preference for primarily commercial uses but allowed for
residential uses as well.
HOWA and Front Gate Homes submitted responses to the RFQ for the Commercial Node. The
Agency's Redevelopment Advisory Committee acted as the Selection Committee. The Selection
Committee's recommendation was to accept the qualifications of HOWA as a first ranked
developer and to reject the qualifications of Front Gate Homes. In April 2005,the Board adopted
Resolution No. 599.02 authorizing the Agency to enter into a Nine-Month Exclusive Negotiation
with HOWA Capital, LLC.
HOWA and Urban Oasis Development, LLC submitted responses to the RFQ for the Greek
Shish Kabob property. The Agency formed a selection committee made up of Agency staff,
Planning staff, RAC members and other development specialists to review the submitted
proposals. The Selection Committee's recommendation was to accept the qualifications of
HOWA as a first ranked developer. In April 2005, the Board adopted Resolution No. 599.03
authorizing the Agency to enter into a nine-month Exclusive Right to Negotiate with HOWA.
In June 2005, the Board delegated limited authority of approving or rejecting an extension of the
Exclusive Right to Negotiate time period to RAC. Under this system, the Board continued to
serve as the final approval authority over the selection of the developer and the initial terms of
the Exclusive Right to Negotiate when marketing Agency-owned property. Members of RAC
acted as the consenting authority for extension requests related to the negotiation process. An
Exclusive Right to Negotiate extension could be granted if the developer had continuously acted
in good faith and had not yet, despite all reasonable efforts, had sufficient time to complete the
project planning. A developer would be limited to two 90-day extension requests to RAC; any
additional requests would be subsequently referred to the Board.
In January 2006, RAC approved a six-month extension of the exclusive negotiation period.
In November 2006, the Board established a subcommittee of three Board Members to assist in
refining HOWA‘s final proposal for the development of Agency-owned property located at 500
North 300 West (Commercial Node) and 519 North 300 West (Greek Shish Kabob).
In August 2006, the Board adopted Resolution No. 616.01 authorizing the Agency to enter into a
three-month Exclusive Negotiation with HOWA for the development of Agency owned property
located at 500 North 300 West (Commercial Node) and 519 North 300 West (Greek Shish
Kabob).
2
In December 2006,the Board adopted Resolution No.622.02 authorizing the Agency to enter
into a three-month Exclusive Negotiation with HOWA for the development of Agency owned
property located at 500 North 300 West (Commercial Node)and 519 North 300 West(Greek
Shish Kabob).
In February 2007,the Board adopted Resolution No.624.03 approving the Terms for the
Purchase and Sale Agreement,Purchase Money Note,Deed of Trust,Payment Guaranty,
Development Agreement,Development Agreement Guaranty,Option Agreement,
Reimbursement Agreement,Declaration of Covenants,Conditions,and Easements,Arctic Court
Mid-Block Walkway Easement,and Project Mid-Block Pedestrian and Vehicular Easement with
Howa Capital,LLC for the Development of Agency owned property located at 500 North 300
West (Commercial Node)and 519 North 300 West(Greek Shish Kabob). The Developer
Improvements include the following:
• 80 condominium housing units above commercial(±5%):48 units on the
500 North corner and 32 units on the 600 North corner. Construction of 9
townhouse units along Arctic Court.The residential portion will be
comprised of 1-,2-and 3-bedroom units.
• 39,150 square feet(±5%)of commercial space,with a minimum of 30,350
square feet(±5%)on the ground floor for retail and commercial services
(non-office).
• 73 on-site commercial parking stalls(±5%)and 156 residential parking
stalls(±5%)all of which arc structured parkins.
• Water feature and public pavilion plaza.
In March 2007,the Board adopted Resolution No.625.01 authorizing the Agency to grant an
additional 30-day Exclusive Negotiation with I1O WA for the development of Agency owned
property located at 500 North 300 West (Commercial Node)and 519 North 300 West(Greek
Shish Kabob)and to amend the Terms for the Purchase and Sale Agreement,Purchase Money
Note,Deed of"trust,Payment Guaranty,Development Agreement,Development Agreement
Guaranty,Option Agreement.Reimbursement Agreement and Easement Agreements.
In June 2007,the Board adopted Resolution No.630.03 approving the first amendment to the
Purchase and Sale Agreement with HOWA,allowing the closing date be extended until August
16,2007.
In August 2007,the Board adopted Resolution No.632.01 approving the second amendment to
the Purchase and Sale Agreement with HOWA,allowing the closing date be extended until
November 16.2007.
At the Board meeting held November 13,2007,the Board adopted Resolution No.636.01
approving the third amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement with IIOWA,thereby
extending the closing date of the property purchase until May 16,2008.
3
In May 2008,the Board adopted Resolution No.644.06,approving a fourth amendment to the
Purchase and Sale Agreement with HOWA,LLC,extending the closing of the property purchase
until August 16,2008.
On June 10,2008,the RDA Board adopted Resolution No.645.05,approving terms for a
Purchase and Sale Agreement for Agency-owned property on the east and west sides of 300
West between 500 North and 600 North.The closing date for the west side properties was
September 16,2008. The deadline for closing for the east side properties is March 16,2009.
On October 2,2008,HOWA closed on the purchase of the Agency's west side properties.
Construction commenced shortly thereafter.
On February 10,2009,the RDA Board approved an extension of the Purchase and Sale
Agreement for Marmalade East,which is set to expire on March 16,2010. The Board further
approved that HOWA could present changes to the project design to the Board,but must be done
by September 30,2009. HOWA must also submit its conceptual design to the Planning
Commission by October 30,2009,and have proof of project financing by December 31,2009.
On September 22,2009,HOWA presented a new design scheme for the Marmalade East project
to the Board. The new design included a 2-story L-shaped building with approximately 30,600
square feet of retail and office space,a 4,700 square foot bank,and a 40,000 square foot grocery
store.The Board slid not approve the new design,and directed staff to form a subcommittee
comprised of three Board members to reach a consensus on a design solution with HOWA.
On October 13,2009,the Board adopted Resolution No.665.04,approving a Second Amended
Purchase and Sale Agreement,thereby granting HOWA an additional three-month extension of
all the milestone dates.
Due to the need for additional time to work with HUD on a 221d(4)application for the housing
phase,Howa Capital,L1,C requested a 30-day extension of the milestone dates for the
Marmalade East Project.On December 8,2009,the Board adopted Resolution 670.03,approving
a Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement.
On January 12.,2010,HOWA presented a new design concept for the Marmalade East project,in
response to concerns from the Board about the revised design that was presented in September.
The Board deferred approval of the design to the Marmalade Subcommittee,which subsequently
denied approval.All submissions required to accompany the design concept were not received
by the RDA by the January 29t deadline,per the Purchase&Sale Agreement.
4
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 11, 2011
To: City Council Members
SUBJECT: Policy Discussion regarding Pedestrian Safety
During the Council's mid-year retreat last July, the Council established "Walkability and
Transportation" as one of its top project priorities. Of the issues included in this larger priority
category, the Council chose to request further discussion on Pedestrian Safety. Topics for the
discussion would include a broader understanding of current City initiatives and opportunities to
improve walkability and safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists.
To move this priority forward and focus the large topic, the Administration has proposed using
this briefing session for the Council to hold a policy discussion with various Department and
Division directors to focus on the following points:
1. A discussion of what is currently happening throughout the City (what is "on the
ground"), compared to what our various guiding policy documents dictate should be
occurring.
2. A discussion of what the council's vision is for the prioritization of pedestrians.
3. A discussion of some examples of how we could do things differently.
The Administration's intent for the discussion would be to identify action items or next steps,
including:
A. An updated policy statement that spells out the City's position on the importance of
pedestrians and how the City is to view all of its policy and projects through the filter
of being pedestrian-friendly;
B. A list of specific initiatives that the Council wishes to see implemented by the Mayor
in the next 12-18 months (or at least explored/scoped, with budget info and a timeline
to be submitted at a later specified date).
An existing section of the Council's Policy Manual related to a"Citywide Transportation
Philosophy" is attached.
Council Member Policy Manual
Section F: Transportation
4
F.1 CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION
PHILOSOPHY
I
a. The Council fully supports changing the
IFF4
� focus of transportation discussions from moving
• • • • cars to moving people. The Council strongly
supports and encourages the Administration's efforts
to look for all alternatives which will allow Salt
Lake City's neighborhoods to be preserved and to flourish. The Council:
1. considers neighborhoods, residential and commercial, as the
building blocks of the community;
2. encourages the preservation and enhancement of living
environments,particularly the Downtown area;
3. discourages through traffic on streets,other than arterial streets,
in residential neighborhoods;
4. will focus on ways to transport people to their desired
destinations, not on moving motorized vehicles at the expense of
neighborhoods;
5. will make and support transportation decisions that increase the
quality of life in the City,not necessarily the quantity of development;
6. supports the creation of a series of linkages (provisions and
incentives)to foster appropriate growth in currently defined growth centers;
7. supports more public-private partnerships in which all who
benefit from capital improvements participate in funding those
improvements;
8. supports considering the impacts on neighborhoods on at least
an equal basis with the impacts on transportation systems in the
transportation master plan and related planning;and
9. will give all neighborhoods equal consideration in transportation
decisions.
Item A . 5
Please See
Item A . 5
from 11 . 16 . 2010
Agenda
Item A . 6
Please See
Item A . i
from 1 . 4 . 2011
Agenda
Library Board Appointment: Emilie Charles
INTRODUCTION:
Mayor Becker is recommending Emilie Charles to be appointed to serve
on the Library Board. If appointed she will replace John Becker and will serve
the term through June 30, 2011.
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
Ms. Charles resides in District 3 and works as a public involvement
consultant for Wilkinson Ferrari & Co. LLC. Before joining Wilkinson Ferrari,
Ms. Charles was a project manager for Bear West Company, an environmental
land use planning firm in Salt Lake City. She has also served as Deputy Chief
of Staff for Salt Lake City Mayor Palmer DePaulis and as an Executive
Assistant for Utah Governor Scott M. Matheson.
Ms. Charles is interested in serving on the board to give back to the
Library and City that has given her so much. She believes that the Library is a
focal point in the community and would be honored to be a part of the
conversation and future of the Library.
RESPONSE DEADLINE:
If you have any objections to this appointment, please let Amber know by
January 10, 2011.
CURRENT COMPOSITION OF LIBRARY BOARD:
All members of the Salt Lake City Library Board are required to be City
residents. Board members include: Hugh Gillilan, District 6; Ella Olsen,
District 6; Mark Alvarez, District 4; Ila Rose Fife, District 2; and Kevin Werner,
District 5.
BOARD STRUCTURE:
The mission of this nine-member board is to make and adopt rules for the
operation and care of the libraries and branches; control expenditures of the
library fund; purchase, lease and sell land; purchase, lease and erect or sell
buildings; establish policies for operation of the library and appoint a
Librarian/Director.
# APPLICATION
Salt Lake City Boards&Commissions
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
451 S.STATE STREET,ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84111
NOTE: PLEASE ATTACH YOUR RESUIVIE.
Name: c W I 1 ito C,kety, k ,
Home 1-le tOt AVMAtitC
Address: Street
City Zip Council District
Phone: Cib1' 17,S".9.1 Of 3tiJ•DOJ' % -232 -2'1'13
Home Work Cellular# Mail Address
/ � •_ I YY�I +t 1/k n'00 C li4 M
144 r��5. CO
Occupation: ?VWI
C V r d M �'.P ebY1914 f` {4t. ' .
Committee(s),Board(s),Commission(s)or Authority in which you are interested:
�! 'lora r F3oard
RRe`op for your interest in this particular committee%board/gommissio or authority:
1
ra'"i�Y'I�try so��lNer(,Kam. L 5 �ui IdiN7}19ook.4 avid Co(ler kias-Sr
150-V.W-41,0-0 Qwv Ow» wa41 E-v t c ir^edauci P,ite4"cr ledl focti5LoveirtlAvA olatta4,40
ed •144 do w to cut! . 16414
tvi:stt i wL4 Y4 Gs� r�+4 Dft+¢.+%v 144' wept .t, eped t .hs^4ct i tf+c Tu,c i4
rit l%Ot4cvecd - Iv++.l ttd deiw.t.as.the u r boaiol Fp`I.4..pow*:eF f� - c�O 4 , ,4vuoi.'
tt�c d ti a to al f''K+.e_+IA h e�r-� t-c.6i%'y a�s.d{-v.a 'HIM- G,ai C 40 Huu:G.
Are you currently serving on any other City committees? If so,which
committee(s)/board(s)/commission(s)/authority?'
k'
Have you had previous contact with the committee/board/commission/authority for which you are making
application? WO If so,when,and the circumstances?
(OVER) ._
1
Cacnmuni Sc A es ast and present):
ripm t ' Gt L t �/i
AO Cat 0 SeW
It(1,11At (� ,hi iira�easS tie ill Sam 5 5vc,G.e.-v- G-C44.6 i= .> )/
Professions Activities•
14k ektah ui Q - sc,i'a h Pa r c Pa-trA C-L A c 1 .
Civic/Professional Organization Memberships:
1
•
•
Ethnic Group(to assure fair and equal representation—answer optional):
1.
Other Pertinent Information:
Please`list three references d phone numbers:
1) 54U/1—Pat—.0 I / 9t)I "' 'I?? 33
2) ko v lel ►dos 4 ?0( -- 5-q6 - 5a0 O
3) f'cdt,tiev 7lePat4k5 ?o.( - 5 @ F4LAS"."
DATE: i /AMA--
5 J / 1 J
j { SI ATURE
WOO
1
4
BOARDS &COMMISSIONS '
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
This statement is to be filed by all applirxnts for positions on regular or special committees,
boards,authorities,and comC/t4c
issions of Salt Lake City.
I, -GM I I I e L-t e 5 (Name),being first duly sworn,certify that I
am applying to serve on the S.L t kt a 41 Ct r n a ril Dfastrioard or Commission)and
that the following statements of my financial interests are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
A. EMPLOYMENT
Section 2..44.05o,Salt Lake City Code,requires that every person holding any position with
Salt Lake City Corporation who is also an officer,director,or employee of any other(non-city) •
business entity disclose such position and the nature of such position or employment. A"business
entity"means a sole proprietorship,partnership,association,joint venture,corporation,firm,trust,
foundation,or other organization or entity used in carrying on a business.
The following questions refer to your primary non-city job:
T. Are you presently employed?
V Yes No
If you answered"yes"to the above question,please list each of your employment interests:
. kl'iVi 501 SChsVIW 1 .
a. The name of the business entity: j ' I
j- �ry
b. The address of the business entity: F3 j t&$j 2 0 D SO. SLC-J u l-
c. The principal activity engaged in by the business entity: 134,614• 1' la f-7 ems
d. Your job title in the business entity: P-4•6116..1-"AVoloctiviefri Ir ► ''t4 'i,1 j �{�
e. The length of time employed by the business entity: , Y 5
• If you answered"no"to the above question,please state if you are.zetired,unemployed,etc:
r 14
41
Jk
&. BUSINESS INTERESTS
Section 2.4445o,Salt Lake City Code,requires that all substantial Interests you may have in any(non-city)business
entity be disclosed. Please fill out only if separate from the above employment information,unless self-employed.
I. Do you engage in a business in which you are the sole proprietor(owner)?T Yes ✓No
a. Do you,your spouse or your rhilriren own stock in any corporation which,when considered in any
combinatio�j.comprises tea percent(row,)ownership of the outstanding shares of said corporation?
t Yes No
3. Do you,your spouse,or your children have any interests in any limited partnerships or other business
entity whicl3,when considered in any combination,exceeds a ten percent(ro%)interest in such business?
V Yes No
4. Do you own any interest in any business for which Salt Lake City issues a business Iicense,Le.,a
restaurant,an apartment building with three or more units,tavern,etc.? Yes ✓No
N. If you answered"yes"to question 4,does the business entity have a Salt Lake City Business License?
Yes No
If you have answered"yes"to any of the above questions,please state for each business interest
a. Name of the business: Wi(ki Y15CV, P vY o Ari 4- �
b. Address of the business 1.3q i 6 - ('Q b c -li yu%fie /0'0 44 LC Ur/34/o ts�
c. The principal activity engaged in by the business pt611 C• !'e(4-I-014 s
d. The nature of your interest in the business: litUS440,4 i s co% dw He v.; Z way p t.4•+i 44,.
—1—i�o srr
e. The length of time associated with the business: 141.3101444 t t/-` 44111 j Wes, (I� Yea y�j
E. If You answered"yes"to question 4 above,state whether the value of your interest is:
L Under;TS,000 Over s 5,000
(attach additional sheets if necessary)
I certify that no conflicts of interest exist or that all conflicts have been disclosed in writing on this
statement.
Dated this ✓ day of Jc, A
),41#.400.4.,,,
( ture of Applicant or Board Member)
STATE OF UTAH )
:ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
Subscribed and sworn to(or affirmed)before me byt11.4le S('f5 dryAvIts • on this
r k day L\1A� 1�,}(l Y ,z>311 (Appl,rane or Board Member)
''J
•
~�• TRESSfE JQRDAP!
(Notary Public,residing in Salt Lake County,Utah
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF UTAH
My Comm.Commission
Exp. 8/08/012
(This is a conflict of interest disclosure statement only. Additional disclosures or restrictions may apply if
your financial,business,or professional activities conflict with your city responsibilities.)
II
1
4
; -i Emilie (Mimi) Charles
. � M Public Involvement Manager
Fzrar
�►'� Mimi has more than 25 years of community
and public involvement experience.Her
WILKINSON strong analytical and communication skills were put to work managing the
FERRARI communications and public involvement efforts for the Utah Department of
$� C e M P A N Y Transportation's Wasatch Back,Box Elder,and Eastern Iron County emerging area
plans,UDOT's Long Range Transportation Plan,the Uintah Transportation Special
Service District Corridor Bypass Study,the North Legacy Supplemental Study,Holly
Corporation's Porcupine Ridge Pipeline Alignment Study,Utah Transit Authority's Airport Light Rail Re-
evaluation Study, Bureau of Land Management's Moab and Monticello Field Office Resource
Management Plans,and UDOTs Utah County 1-15 Corridor Management Plan Study. Mimi provides
governmental relations consultation for the UNEV Pipeline,a 400-mile petroleum products pipeline that
will run from North Salt Lake to North Las Vegas.
Before joining WF&Co.in 200D,Mimi was a project manager for Bear West Company,an environmental
land-use planning firm in Salt lake City.As project manager,Mimi gained extensive experience in client,
stakeholder,public,government and community relations,National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)
implementation,public involvement and project management.Mimi's responsibilities included NEPA
implementation consultation,NEPA public Involvement,meeting facilitation and document preparation
for large public projects such as the Bureau of Land Management's preparation of the Questar,Williams
and Kern River Pipeline Expansion Environmental Impact Statement(EIS),the U,S.Forest Service's
preparation of the Brighton Ski Resort EIS,and the development of resource management plans for U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation's Lost Creek Reservoir,Starvation Reservoir,Deer Creek Reservoir and Willard
Bay Reservoir.
Mimi served as Deputy Chief of Staff for Salt Lake City Mayor Palmer DePaulis managing the Mayor's
personal staff and serving as liaison between the Mayor and City Council.Prior to working for Mayor
DePaulis,Mimi served as an Executive Assistant for Utah Governor Scott M.Matheson.
Mimi earned a BA degree in history from the University of Utah.
Item C . i
Please See
Item A . 3
from 11 . 16 . 2010
Agenda