01/22/2013 - Formal Meeting - Minutes MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22 , 2013
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session
on Tuesday, January 22, 2013 at 7 : 00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council
Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State.
The following Council Members were present:
Carlton Christensen Charlie Luke Kyle LaMalfa
Jill Remington Love Luke Garrott Stan Penfold
Soren Simonsen
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; Edwin Rutan, City
Attorney; Mayor Ralph Becker; David Everitt, Mayor' s Chief of Staff;
and Beverly Jones, Deputy City Recorder; were present.
Councilmember LaMalfa presided at and conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONY
#1 . 7 : 06 : 12 PM The Council led the Pledge of Allegiance.
#2 . 7 : 06 : 45 PM Mayor Ralph Becker presented the annual State of
the City. View Address
(M 13-1)
#3. 7 :42 : 07 PM Councilmember Simonsen moved and Councilmember
Luke seconded to approve the Salt Lake City Council minutes for
Tuesday, January 8, 2013, which motion carried, all members voted aye .
View Minutes
(M 13-3)
POTENTIAL ACTION ITEMS
#1. RE: 7 : 43 : 10 PM Adopting a final bond resolution (a)
authorizing and providing for the issuance and sale of not more than
$2 million aggregate principal amount of Industrial Revenue Bonds
(Uinta Brewing Project) , Series 2013, to finance the costs of the
acquisition, construction, improvement, equipping and furnishing of
certain facilities for use by Uinta Brewing; (b) authorizing the
execution and delivery of a Loan Agreement among the City and Top-
Notch Holdings LLC, an Indenture of Trust between the City and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, and related documents;
and (c) providing for related matters . View Attachments
Councilmember Simonsen moved and Councilmember Christensen
seconded to adopt Resolution 1 of 2013, which motion carried, all
members voted aye .
(Q 12-8)
13 - 1
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22 , 2013
#2 . 7 : 43: 49 PM Adopting an ordinance amending Salt Lake City
Ordinance 56 of 2012, which adopted the final budget of Salt Lake City
for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2012 and ending June 30, 2013 .
This budget amendment would create a revenue and expense budget of
$1 . 8 million for the Street Lighting Enterprise Fund. The amendment
would create three new full time employee positions to run the new
program. The Council adopted ordinances creating the fund on December
11, 2012 . This amendment also includes a Council request to consider
funding in support of the Congress of New Urbanism (CNU) 2013
Conference . (Budget Amendment No. 2) View Attachments
Councilmember Garrott moved and Councilmember Penfold seconded to
adopt Ordinance 5 of 2013, which motion carried, all members voted
aye .
8 : 09 :20 PM Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director, said on
Item D-2, the budget amendment, there were some motions attached and
staff was not clear whether the Council intended those motions to be
included.
Councilmember Penfold moved and Councilmember Simonsen seconded
to include an additional $15, 000 for the CNU Conference and ask the
Administration to prepare a report on the strategic rollout of energy
efficient upgrades , which motion carried, all members voted aye .
(B 12-11)
#3 . RE : 7 : 44 : 35 PM Adopting a resolution: View Attachments
a) Designating the Salt Lake City, Utah, Central Business
Improvement Area No. 13 and authorizing City officials to
proceed with economic development improvements . (The
resolution would create a district in which assessments
would be levied against various properties in downtown Salt
Lake City to fund economic promotion activities there. )
b) To appoint a Board of Equalization and Review for the Salt
Lake City, Utah, Central Business Improvement Assessment
Area No. 13 to hear and consider objections and corrections
to any proposed assessments on various properties within the
district and authorizing the City Recorder to publish and
mail notices about dates and times and place the Board would
meet.
Councilmember Garrott moved and Councilmember Penfold seconded to
adopt Resolution 2 of 2013, designating Salt Lake City Business
District Improvement Area No. 13 and Resolution 6 of 2013 appointing a
13 - 2
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22 , 2013
Board of Equalization to hear and consider objections to that
district, which motion carried, all members voted aye .
(Q 12-11)
COMMENTS TO THE CITY COUNCIL 7 : 45 :22 PM
Oscar Ross spoke about police corruption and police violence. He
asked for an investigation of an incident on January 11, 2009 where he
was accosted by Salt Lake City officers . Councilmember Garrott
referred Mr. Ross to Council staff for assistance .
The following spoke or submitted hearing cards in opposition to
the proposed electronic sign ordinance : Kerry Parker; Randy Evans ;
Steve Miller; Jeff Young; Randy George; Nate Ashby; Vince Coley; Jeff
Krantz; Kevin Anderson; Mike Record; Wes VanDykes; Mike Young; Paul
Young and Brian Baker.
The following submitted cards but did not wish to speak: Brody
Macey and Albert Betoudji.
Miriam Hyde said she felt electronic signs were distracting. She
thanked the Council for what they had done for Communities With
Disabilities . Amir Cornell spoke on accessory dwelling units being
located within mile from public transportation. He said he supported
electronic signs . Diego Carroll spoke in support of the Congress of
New Urbanism.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
#1 . RE: Adopting an ordinance amending Salt Lake City Code
Section 21A. 46 . 020 .B, titled Defined Terms, and enacting Section
21A. 46 . 070 .X, titled Electronic Signs pursuant to Petition Nos .
PLNPCM2010-00717 and PLNPCM2010-00032 . The sections are parts of an
ordinance first considered by the City Council in January 2012 .
Related provisions of Title 21A, Zoning, may also be amended as part
of Council consideration on the petitions . View Attachments
(0 11-7)
2 . RE: 8 : 11 : 53 PM Adopting a resolution ratifying the Mayor' s
appointment of temporary Justice Court judges for the Salt Lake City
Justice Court. Temporary judges are required in the event that Salt
Lake City Justice Court judges need to recuse themselves or otherwise
be absent from their duties . View Attachments
Councilmember Garrott moved and Councilmember Christensen
seconded to adopt Resolution 3 of 2013, which motion carried, all
members voted aye.
13 - 3
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22 , 2013
(R 13-2)
3 . RE : 8 : 12 : 18 PM Adopting a resolution authorizing a loan from
Salt Lake City' s Housing Trust Fund to Liberty Village Property,
LLC/Cowboy Partners for the construction of the Liberty Village
Apartment Building at 2150 South McClelland Street. The 30-year,
$750, 000 loan at 2% simple interest per annum would be used to
construct a five-story building that would consist of 171 residential
units - 35 of which would be affordable rental housing units for
residents at or below 500 of the City' s area median income and 136
units would be market rate . View Attachments
Councilmember Christensen moved and Councilmember Simonsen
seconded to adopt Resolution 4 of 2013, which motion carried, all
members voted aye .
(R 13-3)
CONSENT AGENDA 8 : 14 : 08 PM
Councilmember Penfold moved and Councilmember Simonsen seconded
to approve the Consent Agenda, which motion carried, all members voted
aye .
#1 . RE: Setting the date of Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 7 : 00
p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance
amending the zoning map pertaining to property located at 1614 West
700 North pursuant to Petition No . PLNPCM2012-00225 . The proposal
would amend the Salt Lake City Zoning Map from R-1/5000 (Single Family
Residential) to CB (Community Business) to allow for a dental office
use . (Petitioners Lars and Bethany Christensen) View Attachments
(P 13-1)
#2 . RE: Setting the date of Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 7 : 00
p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance
amending the Future Land Use Map of the Sugar House Community Master
Plan and amending the Zoning Map pertaining to property located at
2016 South 2100 East pursuant to Petition Nos . PLNPCM2012-00367 and
PLNPCM2012-00366 . The proposal would amend the Future Land Use Map
from Low Density Residential (5-10 dwelling units per acre) to Mixed
Use - Low Intensity. The proposal would also amend the Zoning Map from
R-1/7000 (Single Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) . No
specific commercial use has been identified by the petitioner.
(Petitioner 2022 LLC) View Attachments
(P 13-2)
#3 . RE: Setting the date of Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 7 : 00
p.m. to accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance
13 - 4
MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22 , 2013
amending Salt Lake City Ordinance 56 of 2012, which adopted the Final
Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
2012 and ending June 20, 2013 . This amendment includes items such as
carry-forward encumbrances for the sewer, storm water and water funds,
as well as a proposal for the Steiner East Sports Complex. (Budget
Amendment No. 3) View Attachments
(B 13-4)
#4 . RE: Adopting Resolution 5 of 2013 approving the reappointment
of Tom Godfrey and David L. Buhler to the Metropolitan Water District
for a term extending until January 1, 2017 .
(I 13-1)
The meeting adjourned at 8 : 25 p.m.
Council Chair
City Recorder
This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as
additional discussion may have been held; please refer to the audio or
video for entire content.
This document along with the digital recording constitute the
official minutes of the City Council Regular Session meeting held
January 22, 2013 .
bj
13 - 5
/' M - ,~-~
ADDITIONAL
City Council Announcements
January 22, 2013
A. Information Needed by Council Staff
1.s:11:00 PM Council Retreat
One Council Member is not available for the Council Retreat on January 29. Would the
following schedule meet with Council Member approval?
• January 29 - no Council meeting and no retreat
• February 5 - Council Retreat
• February 12 - add a Formal Meeting to the RDA/ Work Session
• February 26 - possible catch-up Work Session, if needed
Council Members were in favor of holding the retreat on February 5th with a
possible catch up Work Session on February 26th if needed. Ms. Gust-Jenson asked what
time the Council wanted to hold the retreat. Council Members were in favor of starting at
11:00 a.m. and going until 4:30 p.m.
1. s:20:01 PM 2013 American Planning Association (APA) Conference
Date: Saturday, April 13 - Wednesday, April 17 - 2013) follows the Utah League Midyear
Conference)
Location: Chicago, IL http: //www.planning.org/conference/
",- Are there Council Members who would like to attend this conference? Ms. Gust-
Jenson said to let staff know if any Council Member was interested in
attending the conference.
2. 8:21:16 PM ULCT - Local Officials Day at the Legislature
Each year the Utah League of Cities and Towns holds a day for local officials to meet with
State legislators. A special program for youth council members to come together for a luncheon
and presentation is also included. http://www.ulct.org/ulct/index.html
Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Time: 7:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Utah State Capitol Hall of Governors, Lower Level
7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. Registration and Continental breakfast
8:00 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. Mock Committee Hearings on Actual Legislative Issues
They will debate HB 3431 (Anti-bullying Amendments)
9:30 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Free time to meet with legislators or take a self-guided tour
of the Capitol
Marriott Downtown at City Creek Ballroom E
10:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m "The Rewards of Curiosity" Keynote Speaker: Ken
Jennings, 74 time winning Jeopardy! Champ
Salt Palace Convention Center Grand Ballroom
1
12:15 p.m. - 2:00 p.m Lunch with Legislators ULCT Style Jeopardy featuring
Speaker of the House, President of the Senate and other
elected officials Hosted by: Ken Jennings
>"' Are there Council Members who would like to attend this event? Registration
deadline is January 24. Ms. Gust-Jenson said these reservations needed to be
made by January z4th so she asked Council Members to let staff know by
tomorrow.
>" Does the Council want to fund registration for the City's Youth City government to
attend this year and/or future years? Ms. Gust-Jenson said for under $1,000
they could send more than 30 children. She said last year the money came
out of the Council's office budget. She said there was a fund available for
legislative issues. Council Members were in favor.
3.8:24:56 PM FYI - 2013 ULCT Midyear Conference
Date: Wednesday, April 10 - Friday, April 12, 2013
Location: Dixie Center, St. George
Ms. Gust-Jenson said to let staff know if anyone wanted to attend.
4. s:2s:os PM FYI - National League of Cities Convention
Correction: Congress WILL be in session during the NLC in Washington D.C. to be held
March 9-13.
2
140 South Dearborn Street
Suite 404
Chicago, IL 60603
Tel: 312-551-7300
Fax: 312-346-3323
cnuinfo@cnu.org
www.cnu21.org
LIVING COMMUNITY:
THE 21ST ANNUAL EVENT FROM
THE CONGRESS FOR THE NEW URBANISM
MAY 29 - JUNE 1, 2013
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
January 21. 2013
Salt Lake City Council Members:
As you are aware the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) will be holding their
annual conference in Salt Lake City on May 29th through June l st. This is a
tremendous opportunity that has been afforded to Salt Lake City and the Wasatch
Front. We stand to benefit greatly from hosting this conference and will also have the
opportunity to give back by sharing much of the great work that is and has been
done here in Utah, associated with creating better and more sustainable places to
live, learn, work, and play.
CNU is a member-based, advocacy organization promoting walkable, mixed-use
neighborhood development, sustainable communities and healthier living
conditions. CNU is one of the thought leaders, and now it is moving into a strong focus
on implementation for better placemaking in the United States. CNU has been
actively involved in initiatives to change the landscape of how development occurs
through making sure that the components of policy, development, and economics
are in line to emit the types of communities which can be viable on a long term basis.
Over the course of the past four and a half years a contingency of individuals (making
up the Local Host Committee for CNU 21) have dedicated time and effort to
preparing for CNU 21. We wanted to bring CNU 21 to Salt Lake City because of a
common belief in the mission of CNU. We believe in the way that it looks at creating
community. We believe there is much that Salt Lake City and the Wasatch Front can
learn with this highly esteemed conference being held right here in our midst. The
preparations alone have been extremely rewarding. The big payoff will come though
when individuals from around the country and the world will descend on Salt Lake City
to both share and learn.
We would like to ask for your consideration in helping us to move these efforts forward.
There is a specific opportunity before you to directly partner with the CNU 21 and the
Congress for the New Urbanism. As the host city for CNU 21 the direct support through
a financial commitment will prove critical to showing direction to other municipalities
who will look to Salt Lake City and your leadership in determining whether to also
become a CNU 21 partner.
As Chairman of the Local Host Committee for CNU 21 I would ask that you ponder the
importance of the role of host city for CNU 21 and partner with us. Your financial
support will be essential to determining the success that we will all experience. I
implore you to pass the budget request before you to support CNU 21 and the
Congress for the New Urbanism. WE NEED YOU!
Sincerely,
MICHAEL HATHORNE
Local Host Committee I Chairman
CNU 21
City Council Announcements
January 15, 2013
Information Needed by Council Staff
View Attachments
A. Council Retreat 9:32:10 PM
On the calendar for 2013, there are two possible dates for a Council Retreat
./ Tuesday, January 29
./ Tuesday, February 26
./ Other
', What date works best for Council Members to hold a Retreat? A majority of
the Council was in favor of January 29th. Councilmember LaMalfa suggested
having a lunch hour social starting at approximately 11:30 a.m. and start
working at 12: 30.
B. Business Advisory Board
There are unfilled seats on the Business Advisory Board for people from City Council
districts 1,5,6, and 7. It should be noted that George Lukes - a District 6 resident a small
business - has been asked by the Administration to submit an application to serve on
the board. The Administration also has issued a news release that says "interested and
qualified candidates within all districts will be considered.
', Do Council Members have any constituents who would be interested in serving
on the Business Advisory Board? Cindy-Gust Jenson, Executive Council
Director, asked Council Members to let the Mayor's Office or Council staff
know if they had any recommendations. Councilmember Love askedfor
clarification on whether or not applicants had to live in the district or have
their business located in the district. Russell Week, Council Policy Analyst, said
either way acceptable. Councilmember Love said she had two or three names
in her district. Councilmember LaMalfa said there were a couple of potential
applicants in his district.
C. Business Advisory Board Meetings
Business Advisory Board staff has indicated that the board's chair would appreciate
having a Council Member or Council Members attend board meetings on a regular basis.
', Is any Council Member interested in attending the board meetings? The board
meets the second Wednesday of each month at 8 a.m. in Room 326.
', Ms. Gust-Jenson said the Board wanted to renew the invitation to have Council
Members attend their meetings. She said any Council Members who were
interested could have their names included on the Board's mailing list to
receive agendas and/or other information. Council Members Garrott, Penfold
and Love expressed interest.
D. Golf Program Consultant Scope Outline (Attached)
Attached is the proposed outline for the Golf Program Consultant Scope. 9:35:47 PM
:,,. Do Council Members have recommendations?
)"'
Ms. Gust-Jenson said during the budget, Council Members indicated interest in
having an opportunity to review the scope to ensure their concerns were
included. She said one key question staff needed direction on was whether the
Council anticipated that the purpose of the study was to look with fresh eyes at
the golf program or whether the Council anticipated it would look at proposals
that had been put on the table in recent years. A majority of the Council was in
favor of fresh eyes.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said she noticed other issues in the scope and asked if Council
Members wanted her to point those out or if they were ok with the scope as
proposed. Councilmember Garrott asked about dog uses. Ms. Gust-Jenson
said there was a section entitled ''Alternative Uses and Opportunities" which
talked about use of golf course properties and at different times Council
Members expressed they did not want to see golf course property sold. She said
she did not know if that was an official position of the Council. She said if it
was, the Council might want to clarify that or have the Administration clarify
that in the scope. Councilmember LaMalfa asked if that was on the table.
Council Members said yes/fresh eyes.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said another issue was a comparison of Salt Lake City's
historical.financial performance with County golf. She said this might take a
fair amount of time and did not know if the Council thought that would add
value. Councilmember Christensen said he was more interested in tying it in
context with the City's competition with other municipal courses unless
subsidizing operations or something similar was being considered. He asked if
there was a reason to go back and perform a historical comparison with the
County. Ms. Gust-Jenson said she did not know but just wanted to bring this to
the Council's attention. Michael Ackerlow, Acting Housing and Neighborhood
Development Director, said he thought the purpose was to look at similar or
comparable public systems to benchmark against. Council Members expressed
concerns that County courses might not provide a good comparison. Mr.
Ackerlow asked if the Council wanted the Administration to look at other
appropriate courses located closer to the City. A majority of the Council was in
favor.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said another issue (Stakeholder Interviews) listed a number of
people/ groups to interview including Key Golf Division staff, Golf Advisory
Board, Mayor's Citizen Task Force, Council Members/Mayor, Open Space
Advisory Board, Open Space staff and Community Councils. She said it did not
appear a component was included for gathering input from the general public
and wanted to bring that to the Council's attention. Councilmember Love
suggested removing community councils and adding golf course users/focus
groups. Councilmember Christensen suggested including other organizations
like the Utah Golf Association.
...
REVISED-ADDITIONAL
City Council Announcements
January 15, 2013
A. Information Needed by Council Staff
1. Central Business Improvement Area - Board of Equalization
Meetings:
Preliminary tabulation of protests against the creation of a Central Business Improvement Area
appears to be less than 1 percent of the assessed value of the proposed area. That means the
Administration plans to forward for the City Council's January 22 meeting proposed ordinances
to create the area and to establish a board of equalization to hear matters involving properties
within the proposed area. The board of equalization requires participation by members of the
City Council as well as a representative of the Engineering Department, and Treasurers Office.
Board of equalization meetings are scheduled to be held in the Engineering Division, First Floor
Conference Room, 349 South, 200 East on
• Wednesday, February 20; 9 a.m. - 10 a.m.
• Thursday, February 21; 10 a.m. - 11 a.m.
• Friday, February 22; 1 p.m. - 2 p.m.
Council Members are a necessary part of the board of equalization.
',, Are there Council Members who will be available at the days and times listed above? Ms.
Gust-Jenson said one Council Member was needed at each session. Councilmember Garrott
asked if there was an official record of who attended the last session and when. Ms. Gust-
Jenson said she thought there was but did not have that information readily available.
Council Members were in favor of getting that information. Councilmember Christensen
said he wanted February 21st. Ms. Gust-Jenson said if Council Members were not available
on the proposed dates, staff needed to know very soon so advertising could be changed.
2. Reminder: Reverend Jesse Jackson - MLK Keynote Address
Huntsman Center-1825 E East South Campus Drive
January 24, 2013
12:00 pm - 1:00 pm
Staff has reserved each Council Member 2 general admission tickets for the MLK
Keynote Address to be given by Reverend Jesse Jackson. Staff has inquired to see if there
any VIP seating is available. At the suggestion of Council Member Garrott, staff has
asked University leadership whether it might be possible for the Council to meet with
Rev. Jackson at some point while he is in town. Staff will let Council Members know.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said the University was still checking on whether there was an
opportunity for the Council to meet with Reverend Jackson in a smaller setting and
would keep the Council posted.
City Council Announcements
January 8, 2013
1:s1:os PM Information Needed by Council Staff
View Attachments
A. 1:s1:1s PM Annual Reminder - Financial Disclosure
This is a reminder to submit a financial disclosure form statement to the Council
Chair if the Council Member's position in his/her business entity has changed or if
the value of such Council Member's interest in the entity has materially increased
since last disclosure (SLC Code 2-44.050)
Council Executive Director Cindy Gust-Jensen reminded the Council of this
requirement to update each January if there has been any change in financial
situation; Councilmember Simonsen indicated he would need to file a new form as
he has had a change in employment this past year.
B. 7:51:43 PM Council District Newsletters for Public Utilities
Mailing:
Prior to each calendar year, the Public Utilities Department identifies months for
Council Members to include Council District newsletters as part of their monthly
mailing. Council Members save on costs associated with mailing, but pay for
printing expenses out of their communication budget. There is a limit of three
Council District newsletters for each month.
, Council Members, please let Council staff know which month you are
interested in:
o March
o August
o December
NOTE: In keeping with Council policy and using the US Congress as a guide,
Council Members who are up for re-election should not mail out Council
newsletters any later than ten weeks before primary election which is August
13, 2013. Council Members seeking re-election should avoid the month of
August.
Council Executive Director Cindy Gust-Jensen explained there is the need to know
which Council members would be interested in the various editions.
• Council members Christensen, Love and LaMalfa said they would like the
March edition.
• Council members Garrott and Simonsen said they would like the August
edition.
• Council members Luke and Penfold said they would like the December
edition.
C. 7:53:59 PM High School Video Contest Update
As previously authorized by the Council, staff plans to launch the video contest for
high school students sometime in January. Council staff is coordinating with School
District staff to help launch a high school video contest. Students are being asked to
produce a 2 minute video to show Salt Lake City what Arts & Culture, Neighborhood
Quality of Life, Transportation & Mobility, Sustainability, Parks and Open Space,
Economic Health, and Education means to them.
Council staff has been working on a video to launch this campaign, and will share
with Council Members prior to launching. The high school video selected will be
broadcast on SLCTV and published on the Council's website.
Council Executive Director Cindy Gust-Jensen explained Staff will keep the Council
updated on the progress.
D. 7:54:27 PM Neighborhood Mini Grants - Lighter, Quicker,
Cheaper
The Council allocated $90,000 of the FY2012-13 CIP funds to be used in the spirit
of doing projects in a "lighter, quicker, cheaper" manner. The $90,000 allocation is
to be split equally among the seven council districts. Details of this program
include: 1) developing the process for gathering and approving ideas, 2) building a
webpage that contains the program information, and 3) developing a
communication strategy to inform the public about the program.
The Council Office team has identified areas of feedback needed from the Council.
The questions are listed below and attachments are provided for the Council's
review.
};;, Does the Council wish to suggest changes to the website content, grant
agreement draft or communication plan? (See Attached)
The proposed program details have not been discussed with the Administration.
Council Staff recommends that all details of the program be reviewed with affected
Administrative Departments.
a. CED - This department currently administers the City's other grant
programs.
b. Legal - Review of the grant agreement.
c. Finance - Review of the payment requests and cash disbursement process.
d. IMS - Review of IMS related issues.
r Is it okay to ask the Administration for its support on this project?
The proposed Neighborhood Mini Grant Program has not yet been assigned to a
City Department. The following are some options about how to proceed with this
program:
a. Turn the funding over to the Administration with conditions, including
splitting the funds equally among council districts and criteria previously
discussed by the Council at the November 20th meeting.
b. Council Office could accept applications, and request the Administration's
assistance in reviewing project ideas with Council Subcommittee.
Subcommittee recommendations would go to full Council for approval.
c. Pass a resolution (similar to Olympic Legacy Project) that states criteria
and approval and administration of funds. Applications could be
accepted, approved by the Council, and then funds could be disbursed by
the Administration.
NOTE: Council Staff has prepared the following materials associated with the proposed
program. Some of the materials will be external, as useful resources for applicants, while
others are intended to be internal in order to administer the program's details, including
complying with accounting requirements. Before finalizing, Council Staff recommends the
Administration (City Attorney's Office, Finance, Community and Economic Development,
IMS, and Other Departments) review program materials.
Attachment Key User Description
Website Public Program content, timeline and requirements,
including online application.
Application Public Project ideas considered for funding can be
submitted either online or printed and mailed.
Checklist Public A resource that provides a list of program
requirements for project proposals to be
considered and steps that will need to be
completed if a project is awarded a grant.
Grant City Staff and Proposed agreement that includes project,
Agreement Grantee payment terms, and responsible party.
Draft
Communication Council Communication plans for getting program
Plan information out to the public, includes press
releases for media and Council Member
weeklies.
Council Executive Director Cindy Gust-Jensen explained the Staff formed a
working group to come up with various ways to approach this issue. It was
known to be important to the Council and it sounded as if the desire was for them
to take an especially active role in the process. She referred to options a, b, c for
Council consideration.
Councilmember Garrott stated he would like to add the option to have CED
administer the grants with a City Council member from the appropriate district
involved in the decision-making committee in any manner determined.
Councilmember LaMalfa stated he can see that Staff has spent a great deal of time
in putting this together; however, he is concerned with being overly bureaucratic
in terms of the contract. He stated the application seems simple until being
requested to check boxes to comply with all permits, processes and plans. He
stated he feels the contract is intimidating and not legal-ease; does it need to be
dispersed to an entity or to a person; and what about insurance requirements
( does the City insure them or require them to purchase their own policy).
Ms. Gust-Jensen explained staff has not vetted this process at all with
Administration pending feedback of the Council; Administration does have the
Small Neighborhood Grant program. She stated when the Council first voted, it
sounded like they wanted the option to administer the program in -house. One
approach would be to ask the Administration to administer it in the same manner
as they do the Neighborhood Grant Program. Another is similar to during the
Olympics, how the City kept control of the funds and dispersed them but the
Council made the final decision on the projects for each district and
Administration carried out the remainder of the items. She suggested checking
with Administration to see if they have an existing simpler process.
Councilmember Penfold stated he would like to check with Administration to see if
there is a simple mechanism already in place that meets his goal of the funds being
really easy to apply for and easy to receive.
Councilmember Christensen stated he feels just having some type of feedback or
oversight as to how the funds got used would be acceptable; there is not the goal of
the Council to administer the entire process. He stated he would hate to recreate
the wheel if there is a way to synergize with the current staff process. It would be
nice to give input on how the funds got used at least the first round to get a flavor
as to what people have applied for.
Ms. Gust-Jensen stated staff can gather the details as to the current Neighborhood
Grant Program and how it could possibly compliment this program.
E. 8:01:54 PM Congressional Visits for 2013 - Washington D.C.
The National League of Cities Conference is scheduled for March 9 - 13, 2013. The Utah
Legislative Sessions ends March 14. Ken Bullock with the ULCT indicated that because of
the scheduling conflict, many of the cities from Utah will not be attending the NLC, and as
such, the ULCT will not be hosting their traditional dinner event. Further, Carlton has
learned that the US House of Representative will not be in session during the time of the
Conference.
, Would Council Members prefer to attend the Conference as scheduled?
, Would Council Members prefer to attend the Conference as scheduled and set up an
another time for congressional visits?
, Would Council Members prefer to schedule another time for a congressional visit?
Council Executive Director Cindy Gust-Jensen stated staff has secured
reservations for the conference; because the timing is off there is the need to
determine who would still like to attend. If not, there is the need to know if there is
desire to go another time to deliver the City's message to the federal legislators.
She explained attendance at the conference is two-fold; attending as well as
making congressional visits. The City lobbyist in Washington, D.C. (Len Simon)
sets those up and they can be done at any time; in conjunction with the Mayor; by
the Council at various times in coordination with the Mayor's Office, etc. It was
determined the individual Council members could decide and get back with Staff.
Councilmember Simonsen stated if the Council feels it important to go, he would
tentatively like to attend but must.first verify his schedule.
M 1J-5
Updated
City Council Announcements
February 19, 2013
(Updated info is in bold)
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Quarterly Housing Report
Attached is the Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2012-13 for the second
quarter.
};., Is the Council interested in a briefing on the report? Councilmember
Garrott wanted to know how the City was enforcing boarded/non
boarded secure buildings. Council Members wanted a written
briefing.
B. Utah League of Cities and Towns Mid-Year Conference,
St. George
FYI, the ULCT mid-year conference in St. George will be held on Wednesday, April
10 through Friday, April 12, 2013. Details of the conference are forthcoming, but
Council staff can begin making travel accommodations if there is interest from the
Council in attending.
};., Are there any Council Members interested attending the ULCT mid-year
conference? Councilmember Christensen said he would be
attending but his lodging was taken care of. Councilmember Luke
said he would not be able to attend. Cindy Gust-Jenson said they
would work with Planning to see how they wanted to handle the
tour.
FYI - February 26, 2013 Council Meeting
The Formal Council Meeting for Tuesday, February 26, 2013 will begin at
5:00 p.m. instead of 7:00 p.m. to allow for public comment regarding the
Utah Performing Arts Center prior to Council Members leaving to attend
the Legislative Night Celebrating the Sundance Institute. Cindy Gust-
Jenson said she wanted to confirm that 5:00 p.m. would be the public
hearing on UPAC and meeting prior to that as determined by the Chair and
Vice Chair in terms of how much would be on the agenda. Councilmember
Penfold said there would be an RDA component to that meeting as well so
that would have to be coordinated with the chairs.
FYI - Sugar House Streetcar Extension Alternatives and the
Circulation and Streetscape Amenities Plan
The Chair and Vice Chair discussed holding a Public Hearing for this item
on Tuesday, March 19, 2013. This allows time for the hearing to be noticed
to individuals and groups who have expressed interest, a mailing sent to
surrounding property owners, notice given to South Salt Lake, and an Open
City Hall posting prepared. Councilmember Garrott asked if this was
extension 2B and if the question was whether to take it to Sugar House
Monument Plaza or somewhere else. Councilmember LaMalfa said it was
the locally preferred alternative whether to go north up 1100 East or east up
2100 South or something else. Council Members wanted noticing to go up
to 1700 East. Councilmember Luke asked about March 19th for a public
hearing. He said maybe the Council should wait until April for the public
hearing. Council Members were in favor of waiting until April.
Councilmember Luke said he received a call from Equality Utah regarding their
statewide non discrimination ordinance legislation being pushed at the Capital. He said
they were trying to put together a list of the different municipalities that have already
started a non discrimination ordinance. He said they wanted to use Salt Lake City's logo
and the Council's support of that state legislation. Council Members were in favor
of letting them use the logo. Ms. Gust-Jenson said they would coordinate
with the Administration.
ADDITIONAL
City Council Announcements
February 12, 2013
tM
Information Needed by Council Staff 6:54:08 PM
View Attachments
A. Possible Resolution
The Salt Lake County Council recently voted unanimously to support state Medicaid
expansion. A constituent has suggested that Salt Lake City pass a brief resolution
encouraging the Governor and legislature to expand Medicaid so that more Utahns
can be covered for basic healthcare.
Background information:
;;., Medicaid expansion is being considered by Legislature and Governor in the
coming weeks.
;;., Counties are responsible for providing behavioral healthcare services for
county residents regardless of ability to cover costs of services.
;;., Counties struggling to meet costs of providing care to those with Medicaid.
Uninsured clients are waiting indefinitely for access to services or are
excluded.
;;., Claim could be made that counties aren't meeting obligations under the law -
potential liability.
;;., In 2014 federal law will require most people to be covered by insurance.
People not sufficiently covered to meet their needs could be turned away by
providers not legally required to provide care for them. They will fall into
safety net.
;;., More people in safety net will place greater burden on counties and their
residents.
> If Utah doesn't expand its share of Medicaid funds (no more than 10%),
Federal funds will go to other states.
Are Council Members interested in doing this? Yes. Councilmember Luke said he
was in support but felt it was important to point out that services were actually provided
by the County.
B. 2013 St. Patrick's Day Parade
Theme: Shamrocks, Shillelaghs & Shenanigans
Date: Saturday, March 16
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Route: through Gateway
www.irishinutah.org
1
Former Council Member Van Turner has invited Council Members to ride on his
fire truck for the St. Patrick's Day parade. The parade is scheduled for Saturday,
March 16 at 10 a.m. Are Council Members planning on participating and would you
be interested in riding on the fire truck? Council Members Luke and LaMalfa
expressed interest. Councilmember LaMalfa asked about parade admission costs.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said costs were covered by the Council.
Staff can follow-up for confirmations, but a general indication of interest would be
helpful. The parade registration deadline is February 23 (after which the fees
double).
C. March Council Meeting Schedule
Council Chair and Vice Chair have suggested changing the March Council meeting
schedule to the following:
March 5, 2013 - Tuesday - Council Work Session & Formal Meeting
March 12, 2013 - Tuesday - Council Work Session & Formal Meeting
March 19, 2013 - Tuesday - RDA MEETING & Council Work Session
Only
Originally, there was not a meeting scheduled on the 12th due to NLC on March 9-
13. Since there are no Council Members attending the NLC, the meeting that is
currently scheduled for March 26th would be cancelled and rescheduled on March
12th.
',, Are Council Members interested in adjusting the March schedule as reflected
above? A majority of the Council was in favor of staying with the original
schedule of March 5th, 19th, and 26th.
D. Giant in Our City 2013
Date: Wednesday, March 27
Time: 6:oo pm - 9:30 pm
Harris H. Simmons, president, chairman and chief executive officer of Zions
Bancorporation, and A. Scott Anderson, president and chief executive officer of
Zions First National Bank will both be honored as A Giant in Our City.
',, Are Council Members interested in attending? Council Members Luke,
Christensen, Simonsen and LaMalfa expressed interest.
',, In the past the Office has reserved a table, would Council Members like the
Office to reserve a table? Yes. Councilmember Christensen said would be
sitting at his employers table.
For Your Information
2
Great Salt Lake Advisory Council's 3rd Annual Report
Council Member Christensen would like to share the Great Salt Lake Advisory
Council's 3rd Annual Report to the State Legislature Natural Resources
Appropriations Subcommittee. Please see attached documents for details. The
report summarizes the Council's accomplishments in 2012 (listed below).
• and Annual Report to the State Legislature
• Published a comprehensive economic benefit report and lake health report
• Developed a master list of Great Salt Lake research priorities
• Developed briefing papers, overview, options and recommendations for:
o Continued eradication of non-native Phragmites
o Funding for creation of a Great Salt Lake integrated water resources
management model.
Councilmember Christensen said the Great Salt Lake generated
approximately $1.3 billion in annual revenue for the State and he thought Council
Members would be interested in reading the report.
3
Fsb l'f, ?.,:_")13
SCANNED TO: ~
SCANNED BY· ~ ';,":,PH 1kriKER G
DATE: 7, z:;7~
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR M:::::~~~~~~;~~~~::~• CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL rn ~F~B ~ lo Z~J~ ill
:- ~ Date Received: ---I..L..Jf:::!.f-.J.LJ-/-__i.a....~-
David E~~tt,Ouef of Staff
ERIC D. SHAW
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
/ "--'.
Date Sent to City Council: d "2--- / ([] / '"uJ/3 r 1
TO: Salt Lake City Council
Kyle LaMalfa, Chair
FROM: Eric Shaw, Director
Community & Economic Development
DATE: January 16, 2013
SUBJECT: Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2012-2013, Second Quarter
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Akerlow, Director of Housing and Neighborhood
Development, at 801-535-7966 or Michael.Akerlow@slcgov.com
ACTION REQUIRED: None
DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing
BUDGET IMPACT: . None
DISCUSSION:
Issue Origin: The City Council has requested a quarterly housing report from the Community
and Economic Development Department.
Analysis: The following information is included in the report.
• Loans to First-Time Homebuyers, Rehabilitation Projects, Funding Sources and
Outreach/Marketing Efforts
• Housing Starts, Additions, Remodels and Repairs
• Boarded Building Activity and Closed/Boarded Houses/ Apartments by Council District
• Housing Trust Fund Ledger
• Subdivision Housing Report
• Community Development Corporation CDBG and HOME Reports
• NeighborWorks Salt Lake CDBG and HOME Reports
• Economic Update
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404
P.O. BOX 1454B6, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114·54B6
TELEPHONE: B01·535·6230 FAX: B01·535·6005
WWW,SLCGOV,COM/CED
@ RECYCLED PAPER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Attachment A: Loans to First-Time Homebuyers, Rehabilitation Projects, Funding
Sources and Outreach/Marketing Efforts
Attachment B: Housing Starts, Additions, Remodels and Repairs
Attachment C: Boarded Building Activity and Closed/Boarded Houses/Apartments by
Council District
Attachment D: Housing Trust Fund Ledger
Attachment E: Subdivision Housing Report
Attachment F: Community Development Corporation CDBG and HOME Reports
Attachment G: NeighborWorks Salt Lake CDBG and HOME Reports
Attachment H: Economic Update
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD
DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING PROGRAMS REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013
QUARTER2
(October 1, 2012-December 31, 2012)
The Housing and Neighborhood Development Division's funding sources include the Community
Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), the HOME Program, and Program Income from CDBG, HOME,
Renter Rehab, Housing Trust Fund and Utah State Funding. Private Funding Sources are with GE Capital, Ally
and American Express.
The First Time Homebuyer Program, which uses HOME, CDBG, and private funding sources, has
placed 385 families in properties. During the second quarter, two houses were rehabilitated and sold. At the end
of the quarter, four homes were available for sale.
First Time Home Buyer Loans
Fiscal YTD 2nd Quarter
Loans Closed 6 2
Dollar Amount $736,595.00 $212,691.00
Average Per Loan $122,765.83 $106,345.50
The Housing Rehabilitation Program has completed 47 projects with 62 units this fiscal year. During
the second quarter, 23 projects with 33 units were closed.
Single Family Rehabilitation Projects
Fiscal YTD 2nd Quarter
Loans Closed 42 19
Dollar Amount $367,269.57 $196,814.00
Change Orders $5,800.00 $5,800.00
Average Per Loan $8,882.61 $10,358.63
Number of Units 42 19
Average Per Unit $8,882.61 $10,358.63
Multi-Family Rehabilitation Projects
Fiscal YTD 2 nu Quarter
Number of Projects 5 4
Dollar Amount $84,025.00 $61,750.00
Average Per Loan $16,805.00 $15,437.50
Number of Units 20 14
Average Per Unit $4,201.25 $4,410.71
Housing Program Funding Sources
FUNDING SOURCES Fiscal YTD %OF 2"ct Quarter %OF
07 /01/12 - 9/30/12 FUNDS 10/01/12 - 12/31/12 FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant $ 501,685.10 42.0% $ 141,010.50 29.6%
Rental Rehab Funds $ 0.00 0.0% $ 0.00 0.0%
Personal Contributions $ 160,892.00 13.5% $ 72,010.00 15.1%
Private Funding Sources $ 95,354.00 8.0% $ 0.00 0.0%
Home $ 372,901.00 31.2% $ 229,812.50 48.1%
River Park Funds $ 59,310.00 5.0% $ 34,222.00 7.2%
Other Funds $ 3,547.47 0.3% $ 0.00 0.0%
TOTAL $ 1,193,689.57 100% $ 477,055.00 100%
Outreach and Marketing Efforts
HAND is continuing its outreach efforts. During the second quarter, it completed its new four-square
marketing program which included delivering 20,000 pieces of information-a letter, brochure, flyer, and door
hanger-on four consecutive weeks to 5,000 households. HAND also sent out letters to each home its target
areas and will begin its regular mailings when the weather improves.
Quarterly Housing Report
For the Quarter From 10/1/2012 to 12/31/2012
BLD2012-04184 6/6/2012
BLD2012-06548 9/5/2012
MERRIMAC TOWN HOMES
ERICKSON RESIDENCE
24 W MERRIMAC Ave
138 W GOLTZ Ave
$425,000.00
$95,000.00
121003013
121030034
10/3/2012
10/30/2012
5
1
Cap ID
BLD2012-04631 6/26/2012 Salazar Residence 938 N SANDHURST Dr $230,000.00 121113045 11/13/2012 1
BLD2012-06183 8/21/2012 SOLEIL COVE LOT #2 1716 S SOLEIL CV $215,000.00 121101014 11/1/2012 1
BLD2012-06270 8/23/2012 CRANDALL COVE #104 2847 S 1335 E $300,000.00 121105018 11/5/2012 1
BLD2012-07284 10/2/2012 1619 KENSINGTON 1619 E KENSINGTON Ave $300,000.00 121130016 11/30/2012 1
BLD2012-07317 10/3/2012 TRUONG RESIDENCE 1102 N TWICKENHAM Dr $600,000.00 121128028 11/28/2012 1
BLD2012-07750 10/18/2012 MOODY RESIDENCE 1723 S SOLEIL CV $300,000.00 121127037 11/27/2012 1
BLD2012-05984 8/13/2012
BLD2012-06901 9/18/2012
21ST SOUTH HOUSE
2233 Parleys
2119 S 600 E
2233 E PARLEYS TER
$120,000.00
$1,750,000.00
121204010
121211023
12/4/2012·
12/11/2012
1
1
Jclditions, Remodels,• & Repairs
October i
Boarded Buildings Activity
2°d Quarter
October 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012
Existing Boarded buildings as of September 30, 2012 52
Vacant/Secure Buildings as of September 3 0, 2012 * 121
Demolition 3
Resolved 1
New boarded buildings 4
Total boarded buildings December 31, 2012 5 2
Buildings vacant/secure December 31, 2012 123
*Properties, which are vacant, and complaints or activity is such that they
require monitoring, but not boarding.
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
Districts . Boarded Buildings Vacant & S$ct1red
Buildings ..
District #1 5 15
District #2 11 39
District #3 1 14
District #4 22 22
District #5 9 27
District #6 1 2
District #7 3 4
Total 52 123
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT -~~ = ·=- -=- = =-- -~ -~ :~ -= -~~ -=- - -=-:_~ - _ --~:- ~/9/~~1)_- _ - - _:=:-=~,-- - - - - _ _-_ =~-=--~:- -=-~:--~ L
: I I ~~!1ress-_~----- -- - -----~-- - - -- _ - ~--- I District #1 - Boarded ' - - - - - - --~ -- --- -~ ~-~-- ~-- j~ -_- -- _
I
-- --- -- -----------•- ------ ----- - ------- - _J_____________ ----------t---------i- - - --- -
1 Sidwell No. i Owner ' Owner's Address Boarded* · Comments
-- - -- -- -- -- ------ ----- - - _L __ ------ ------- - -- - - - -- -1-- --- -- ------- ------ --1--------~ -- -- -- - ----
1 I ,
1710 West Jensen Meadow-:08--34--13~097 --:Anna LLoya___ - - --- -- - --,-PO Box f 342-- -- --- ---;Residentiafl-- ---- -- - --
- - -- ------- --------------- ---------------------- -- ------ - ---i--------- --------------~--------~ -------- -------
' Bountiful UT 84011 : I -- -- --- -- -- -- - --- - _, _- -- --------- r ---- - -------- -_ --- --- -- - , ----- --- - -- - --_ ------ --i - ---- : __ ---- - - -- - __
571 North Redwood Road ,08-34-131-028 Mariposa Properties & 18841 Cheyenne Way :Residential I
- --- ---- --- ---- -- - -- -- - ------ -- ---------- - -- --- --- - - ---,- - -- --- ---- ---- - -i--------------_J___ ---
; Development LLC · Park City UT 84098 · : --- - -- --- - -- ---------- - ----- --- ---------- --- - - ----- ,----- -- - ----------- --+---------,-------------
578North-Redwood Road -~6s~4-:2oi-6T2--1001 iAlant Parsons- --- - - - -- -~-Po s-ox 373- ---- - -tResidential~---- - -- ---
- --- ----- ----- -- ----- - -- - ------ --, -- - -- - - -- -- -------- -- , ------------ --- -----------1,;------ -'-------- - - - ---
Bountiful, UT 84011 Oct-99 I ------- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - --- -- - -- --- - - - -- --- - - -- -- -- - - -- -- ~ -- --- --- -- ~---- -1------ -- ---- -- -----------
1 I , I
' ' ' ----- ---- -- - --- - -- --"--- -- ---- -- -- -- - - --- -~----- -- - - -- -- - -- --- - -- -- -- -- -----t.::;------------ - -- - --- - - -
'!'11_N(.)__rt~_S~r Crest Driv~ -+98-34-153-023 __ ~o_fua_& Mele S Tu_uefiafi _ __ _ 12816 Provo Way ---tResidentia_l__ I _
· : : Sacramento CA 95822 ' - -- -- -- - - -- - -- __ J_ __ -- ----- - ---: -- - - - - ---- ------- --- --- -- ----- -- -- ----~ ---~----
I
I '
1102 West 400 North io8~5:177-021 - - - 1 Salt Lake City Corporation • PO Box 145460 1 Residential ------ - --- - -- - --- ---,-- -- --- --- -- -- ----- -------- ------ - --- - - -- ., - -- ---- -- - -- T ---------
- __ _ __ c:,_lo i:'r(.)pe_liy_M~nagemen_t _ __ 1 !:>alt -~ake Ci_ty UT _s,i.1_ 1_i __ ~- _
-- _....)_ - ------- -·-- ------------------ ------ -- _(__ --- - -- ----------------
' ' , , I ~- ----- - -- -- - __ J_ -- ----- -- -- - - ------ -- --~ ~--- ---------- --- ----- ---- -
Distrtict #1 - Vacant & Secured I 1
- --- ---- -- -- -------, -~ --- - -- ' --- - -- - - --- -- --------:-- -- - --~- - --- - - - -- -
-------------- -------- -- -- -- ----- - ' ------- -- -----+-:-~-------- -----------+------·--•---------------
~94_ fll_(.)_rt~_Bi~y MJtc~eU_R~_ ~7-36-~1:-004 1!5R~P~(.)p~-~-s LLC :!it~~~c~
1~id~;7~~ad
_ -+Comm~cl<!I_T _
---- -- -- - - - --- -- -- -- - -- -- - ---- - ---- -- --- --- -- ----- T -- --
' --- -- - - ------------ ----------------- ----· ---------~----------- '-- --- --- --------~--t=-----------t---------
1028 West Eclipse Way 108-26-331-009 1Secretary of Housing & Urban Dev ,4500 Cherry Creek Drive --ti Residential 1
-- -- - -- -- - -- -- - - -- --- -- - -- . - ---- -- --- ---- --- -- --- ~- -- --- - - - ------ ~---~---,- -- -- ----- --
1 1 c/o Connor & Baul Michaelson · Glendale CO 80246 ! -- - ---- -- --- -- -- -~- ----- -- ------ -:--- --- -- ------ - ----- -- :- -------- --- ------ -- ----r~-~------,--- -- - -- ------
1 • ' -- -- - - -- --- - -- --- _, __ --- -- --- - - -- ,--- --- --- - ----- -- - ---- -- -- -- _ _j_ --- --- - - ---- -- - - ---,.::;-- --- -- ~ - --- - --
553 North Oakley Street 108-35-106-021 :secretary of Housing & Urban Dev ;4400 Will Rogers Parkway 1Residential 1
---------- - ------- --- ·--- ------- - ~----------------- - ----- - -- ---~------,-~-~----------------------
1 c/o Connor Michaelson & Baul Inc 'Oklahoma City OK 73108 1 ------------ - -- ---- ----;-- --- -- -- -- - - - ------ --------- ----- 1--- --- ------ - ------ ---,---- - -- -- -- -- -------
' --- --- - -- - -- - --- ----------'---- - - --- - -- ----- -- - ·- ---- --- ---- -- ---- ---- ---- ~· -~ --
5_5_~ f\Jort_h Q_akle'y'__~tree! +9-8-35-1_06-_020__ JC>_se 9Iorr~s _ __ _ __ __ _ _ 559 North Oakley Street I Residential--~- _
1 Salt Lake City UT 84116 1_· j_ - -- - - --- - -- - I - -- - - -- - - - -- --- - - --- - - - - --- -- -- ' -- ----- -- - --- - --- -- -- - --- - - - - ---- - --- ---- - - - ---
1 I i
l
1~01__',N~_st_Pa!ric@ V'j__ay __ \0!3-~4-1 Z8-0_?_5 _ -~Te[~S~ M H_anki_11_so1"1 _ __ _ _ _ 1_!?9~- ~est_i:'_atrici§_Way __ ~Residential_ :
,SaltLakeCityUT 84116 i ' ·---;------- --.- --+ -· -- - ----··-- -. -- ·----·- ,--------- - - ----· ·- ---r-------- --·t-·
- -- - ·- - --- ---- - ~- - -- -- - -. ' __ --- - -- -~ ·- - -·- - -+----- ---· -- - ·-- -·-·--- ----1----- --·- ----,- - -
930 North Poinsettia Drive 08-26-407-010 : Pablo Lopez & Margarita Figueroa : 930 North Poinsettia Drive I Residential
-- - -- - - - - -- - -- 1- -- - - - -,- - - --- - -- - - - -- ---- - - - -- -- ,--- - --- -- - -- -- - -1- ---- -- -- -1 - -
i Salt Lake City UT 84116 , ·
---- ------------- r---- --------- ----+--------- +
>- -- ·- -- --- -· ·- -- _: -·---- --- - --- -- -I-----·---- __ , ·- - -· -
· Ma L F Dela Cruz . PO Box 33053 1 Residential :
- - - --------· -- -- -- - ----- - ---1--------- -,- - -- -- - -- -
. , Las Vegas NV 89133 , · +--- - - ---· -- - -------·- ·- -· - +-- --- _J .j----- -----------
' ' I -------- J_ ------- _, - --- --- -,--- - ---- -------------+------------1-------
882NorthSirPhilipDrive _ 108-27-302-002 __ {iliberroTapia j882NorthSirPhilipDrive _JResidential~-- _
___ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ _ _ _ __ 1-S~lt Lc3_ke_ Cjty ~T _§'!!_16
'
- !__ -
- --- -- - -
1?_48 West Sir_Charle_s Qr __ 10_8-2_Z-~?7-010
L
-- -- --1- - - - -- --
I I
------- -- -- --- ,-- ------ ---j-------- ----- -- -f- - -- -------- --+--~----,---- -----
436 r-.J_of"tl'l ~ta_r C~es! Driv~_ ;Q8-34-1]~-0Q8 _ '=._as.!_ M_il_e Properti~s LL_C_ __ _ __ J.0Z?7_§o _Riv_E:!r fro_l'lt Pkwy _1Reside11_ti§!_--1 _
1 , c/o Remax Results : South Jordan UT 84095 1 - - - -- -- --- ---- --~ ----- -- -- - --- -+- --- --- --- - - -- - -- --+ -- - - -- --- -- ----- ~-----t------------ I- --- ----- ----
-- -- - - -- --- - - -- __ I __ - - ----- _. - --~ ---- -~---- -- - --L-- - -- -- --- - - _j _,__ -- ----
1060 West Sterling Drive 108-26-326-014 Larry J Winkelkotter 565 South Cheyenne Street
___________ J -~ -------~SaltLakeCityUT 84104 ' ---- -- -----i------- -- - -------
- -- - - - ---- --------t- - - - -- -- - -
11§_0 _ North _ _T opaz D[iV_e 08-~6-~51:-_0Q_6
L -- ------ -- -- --- - - - +- -- - --- -- --- --- --------j------ - ·-r - - --- -- -
: H R & Glennis T Kirkendall : 1150 North Topaz Drive , Residential
- - - - --- - - - -- --:safrlak-eCityUT84116- -:----- -~- - ---- ---
- - -. -- ~- ·- ---- -----.-- ·- -- -· - - -· ·-· ---- -.- -----1---- - ----·--· - - --·-- -
- -- -· - - ----··-- ·- ---- -- _/ .. -- -- --- -- -- : - -- - - ---- -- -· --- --- - :_ ·-- - --- -- --- - -- _j ·------- -t- -- - - - --
149 North 900 West :08-35-453-014 1Richard B Turnbow PO Box 900563 Residential -- ----- -- ---- --- - 1- --- -- --- ----- -- ---- t---------r-- --- --- - -- ----
Sandy UT 84090 i :
=--------= =---_ -- -!=------~---=-=- -~-==--=_:_~-~------ _- - -~ =~-------=: -=-_:_~_--__-___--_:-=_} _ __-_=~-~--=--1-~=--~=-=-=----~---~=-- 153 North 900 West I 08-35-453-013 : Ralph & Daniele Salazar ; 153 North 900 West : Residential 1
------------------ ----- ----··- -------• ---------------- -- ---T-- ·---------------+_:_-----,----------
I 'Salt Lake City UT 84116 , ---··----- - ---- -· ---- •-·- --- --- - ~----- ---------- - -- _) -- ·- ---- -- -----·~----+- -·-- -------
' '
I I I I -+ ---------·----------,- ------------------------------------1 - ---------- -+----- -- --- ------
279 North 900 West __ / 08-35-403-038 _ _ 1 Salt Lake Neighborhood __ _ _ _ _ 1_622 West 500 North ~ommercial_ _ _
I ; Housing Services Inc Salt Lake City UT 84116
- - --- - -- ___j - -- - ------- - --- -- - -- --r - ------- --- - -- ---
I
452 North 1100 West I 08-35-179-012 - 1 Barbara Burrell --- - - -- -- - - -- - -- --j --- - -- --- -- - -- I ---- --- -- -- --· --- --- -- ------ --
I- --- - - -- -- --- --- +.------ I -- -------- -- JI 44 North Irving St #3 __ ) Residential _ ! _
, Salt Lake Citv UT 84116 '
= -~-- _:_~-- -_- --~:_-_:_--~~-- - - _-_11~L~~-~------ -- '-- -- --- - -- -- - l - - --
-; -- - -- - - _J -- - +- . I ~- _- ~- =- -- __ _ _ ~ - __ -_ - I District #2 - Boarded I -
----~----- - ---- '----------
I
~~dres_s_ -- J§_ici_W!!II fi_o.__ _1__0vy_ne!_ _ _ -- ~ _ -- _ ~ D_V'ln(!r~_ ~cl_d!_e~-- _ - ~~ _ ---~Bo_ard_eff' _-_ ~ Co_,ji11'1_e!]_t~ _
• I I I I I I
§3rsE-llth- q_fen_d_aleSlfejfJ_ 5~Q2-3-8iQ3]_ -~ ~CarlWEf~-rn:ey E _ - -~ -~~ - -- -l_ 283_7_~1n_i~<:>od !_ane ~- _ -~~~-1~6~__! ~YQ _=~ ~ _- ~ _-
- -- - - -- - _ 1 __ _ _ _ _ _ 1LaytonUT_~4040 1Re~id~ntial_! _
I ! ' I 1
- - - - - - -- --- - -- --- -- --- - -- ,-- --· --- ---- - - -- -- ------ -- _[_ -- - -- - -- - -- -- ---- - - -- -- - --t-·-- -- - ---- ---- -
48 South Jeremy Street 115-02-205-006 i Tunnel Investments LLC , PO Box 645 ! Residential 1 __ - --~------- ---=:f - -_-- -_-;-- ----_----_---------- -\et1iUTB404f -- - --·==-~=~ --~~--~------
1
--- -- - ---- - ---------- - ------ -- ---• -- -- - -- ---- ------- --l--- -- ---------- ---- ~--- ------,-----------------
572 South Post Street ; 15-02-451-035 i Robert S & Colene Warren ·3907 West Meadowgate Dr ! Residential 1
- - -- -- - - - --- ---- - - -~ ---- - -- - -- ---- - - --+- ---- -- -- -- -- - - --- -- - --- ---+- - -- --- - - - -- - -- -- --r-- -- ---- -----, - -----~
', c/o RSW FM IV RV TRST I West Valley UT 84120 i 6-Feb ----------- -- --,-- -- -- --- ----------- -----1------------- ----- -- ~ -- ----- -------------------
- __ j --
- - ---- --- -- -- -------- --------- __ l_ -- ---- - - -- - - -- -----t; -~- ---- - --- ----- --- - -- - --- -- ---
7_49 South Prospect Street ] 15-J 0-203-001 _ _ 1_Gai1h C _ North _ __ _ __ __ __ __
1
3653 South 50_Q East __ _ 1 ~ 1_{7 /2_902_ ~ Boarded w/o permits_
i , : Salt Lake City UT 84106 , Residential : ---- -- -- ------- -- ---- - -- ----- -- __ _J - --------- - --- -- --· - -·-- + -- - ---- ---- -------- ·--- - -----~------
1 ' I
' ' I ----- ---------- -- ---·------ -- -- -- --- -- --- -- - -- -- -- -- --- - l- --- --- - - -- -- -- ---- --- -- -- -1---------- --- ---
708 South Pueblo Street_ J 15-10-229-010 _ _ __ 1 Nadine Harman__ __ _ _ ----, 1461 South Cheyenne Street i_Residential 1 __ _ _
I . : Salt Lake City UT 84104 i --- - -----· - - -- ·---- - --- -- -- t- -- --- ------------- ------- -----;- --------- ------
-- - -- -- - --- -- -- -------1- --- -- - -- -- -- --~- -- . - --- -- --- - ----- _j__ --·------- - -- - -- - -l----- ·- ·- ----~--- ------~----
968 West Quayle Avenue , 15-14-405-008 Red Stagg LLC 11015 West 1700 South ·Residential I
--- - - - ---- -- ---- -- -- - ------ --- - - 1_ --- - --- -- - - ·------ -- - - --- ----- - ---- _ _j___ -- --
: Salt Lake City UT 84104 , -- - -_ - -- -- ---- ---- :- - - - - -- --_;- -- --- - -- -- -- - - - -=- -------·---_-- ~ - _-;--- --- --- ,- --~ -=-- - --
10 South 800 West 15-02-226-006 1Salt Lake City Corporation 'PO Box 145460 .Residential 1 ------- - --- - ------ - --- -- ---- -- -· -- -- -- - -- -------- ----- --~ -- - -- -- -- ----- -- --- __,_ - - -- -- _T --- --- - - -- -
'c/o Property Management 1Salt Lake City UT 84114 , ,
- -- --- - - - -- --· -- -- - --- -- - - j__ -- - --- --· -- - -- -- --- --.---- ---- - ---- -- - ---l- -- -- -- -- -------~-- -- --
1 '
1ofosouth s66-WesC -- :f5~11~26-0-fo - - +PennyMac Loan ServicesT.Lc- -;-21001-Agoura Road- ------:Residential r~ -- --
- -------- - -- - ----- --- -+ -- - -- -- --------- ---- -- -------------- -- - ~--------r--------------
1 1 Calabasas CA 91301 . ·- - -- ------ -- --r-- ·- -- ------ - --1-- - -- --- --- - -- -- --- -- -- -·-- -- -- -- -- ---- - ---+- -- --- ---~- -~-------- ---
1 • ! I - - - ---- - - -- -- - - - ---+ - --- --- - - ----·- -- j - -- -- - - - . - - - - - - - - -- - -- --- - -- - -- - --r--- ---- - -- - ---1-- ---
516-518 S 900 W rear 15-02-452-022 'Kimberly F Hansen 1516 South 900 West , Residential I -- ----- ~-- -- -- --- ,--- - - - -- - -- -- -1- -- - --- - - -- -- - --- - ·------- -------- - --- -- --- >-- ---- - -- ·----- --·---
L_Salt Lake City UT 84104 1 i
~- =--=-=--:_-=-~ - - -~- -- -- T- - ~---~ - . - - - - --= · J _ _:--=-- -=-=~--=~--=--__:-__-_:--= -~ ~-- I-=---==~~~=-----=-~
_1317_\J\/est_40_Q Soutb ---11_5-()~-393-_()_0~_ _ Jt-,1_c.!_rlcy_!-! tf_olle_n~ec~ __ __ _ _ ~O_E3o~ 651675 1 Re~~e_nti~~ L _
J_ I c/o Chirstopher M Manha rd I Salt Lake City UT 84165 1
--·-- --- - ---- ---- -- -- -- - - -- -- - -- - --- - -- -- --- --- - ---·----- _ __j ----- ----· -- - - -- --- -·-- ---~--- ------
1
1383 West 900 South ', 15-10-281-009- 'Burntol LC I 1383 West 900 South I Residential --- --- -- -- - -- - -- i- - - - -- - - - -, ----- -- - - - - -- -- --- --- -- --- ---r-- --- --- -- - - ---- - -- . - -- - -- ,- - - -- -- --
, ' . Salt Lake City UT 84104 ' --t------------------ 1------- ------ -- --- ---------r---- --- -------- ---i----------------
___ -- ----- ----- ---------~---- ----t------ ------- - _ _ _ I District #2 - Vacant & Secured I _ _ _ --~ ~ _
' '
8j6-_y\iest_.Ar_§eat,_9e}.ve- 15-Q2-4¥~0~2 _ -~~ns_~Trn_o P_§c3Taf-_:- --= -_ --_:--= Jr_cf_Boxf7_1?2{-_~--- _ - __ 7Res_~den~a1_\-- _
, Salt Lake City UT 84127 1
-- -- - -- --- - - - -- ~- -- -- - ---- - - ---- --- -- -- -- -----------· [_ --- - -- --- - - - ---- -- - --- - -4- --- - ----
- -- - - -------- ---- -• -- - -- -- - -- I __ -- - - -- -- ---- --- -- -- -~ --- -- - - - -- - . -- -- - - - - ---- J_ -- --- ---- -- -
1235 West Arapahoe Ave 115-11-102-005 1 Jose L & Miriam E Rodriguez 1869 West Dale Ridge Ave ! Residential · _ _ ~- - __ -=- _i1 -~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ ; Sa_l!_ L91<~ City UT !34) 16 ; _ - _ -+ _ -----~ - - --
1' i - -- ------- ,_ ---- -- -- -- -- ,--- ----- -- --- - ---- ------ i-:;--- ------ -------- --- ·-· -- - --+------------
1467 West Arapahoe Ave 115-10-226-006 Sundar Sathiyanathan 1104 East 600 South Residential , - - ------ -- - - ---- ---- ' ---- -- ----- -- -- -- -- --- -- -- ----- ---- -- -- --- -" -- -- - - - -- -- - -- _l_' -- - - - - L -·-·-- --- -- - -
1 , ' Salt Lake City UT 84102 '
- - -- ------- --- -- -- ----- - - -- -- - ---j------ -- - -- -- ----- - --- --1--------- -- ----- --j-- - -- --
1 : ; --- - ----- - -- ----~ - -- - -- - -- ,-- ---- -- - - -- - - --- -- -- r --- --- - --- -- -- - ------ - - -- --
1487 West Bell Avenue 1 15-10-4 76-006 i Miguel P Ramos PO Box 27894 ,
- -- ----- ------ ----- -- --- - ----- , --- ------------ -- ----- -- - ----- -- - --- - - - '---- - --- - ,----
: 'Salt Lake City UT 84127 : Residential : ---- - - - -- --- ---- -----•-- - --- - - -- -- - _i__ - ---- -- - - - - --- - -- {----- - - -- - -· -- -- -+-- -- -- - -+ -- --- --- ------ ---
1 I I
1456 West California Ave I 15-10-480-021 , Jose D & Victoria A Melendez 1456 West California Avenue 1 Residential ~ -
-- ----- --- - ~-- -- ------ - -- -- - --- ,------- - - - ---- -- - ~ -- - -- - . --- -- ---- ---------- -
, , Salt Lake City UT 84104 ,
- - - -- --- -· -- -- -- -- - --- - -- -- - - r--- - --- ----- --·--- -- -- ---+ -- --- - -- -1-- --- -- ---------
' I
974 West Euclid7wenue-- 15-oi-263-613 - -- --Tomejiro & Komatsu-Yam-amoto --;-1-L.akevtew -- - - - - - -- - ------ -- -- --- -- - -- - - , ------ -- - --·--- - -- - -- -- 1-- -- ---- - ------ ---- -
,& Yukiko Nataishi Stansbury Park UT 84074
___ _ __ _
1
- --- - - - - - --- - --ciosrad Parsons - - -- ~ - _ i - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ ----:- __
-+--=- - -- - - _I --- ----- --- - - --
12-Nov , Vacant/Secured -- - +-- ----------
Residential , Residential
1030 West Learned Ave ! 08-35-377-004 - , Federal National Mortgage Assoc l 400 National Way - 1 Residential 1 __ ---=-=~-~-~~-=--=--~-~l----=--~~ -~~~ -~ -~~~=- = ~-= ~~- =- _- =---=--=- ~~~v_?}l~c~~~~t~==T- -~---=-- =-~+ =~ -~- -~ --~~
1033 West Learned Ave '08-35-378-002 I Rodney & Cynthia Newby ! 1032 West Learned Avenue I Residential i ___________ - +- -- __ - - --- - - -_____ _ _ISaltLakeCityUT_84116 __ ~--- _-_ L - _
1 I I 1 - - --- --- ----- --- -- - -- - --- - -- - - , __ --- -- -- - - -- - --- - --- ---·-- --- -- ---- - ---- --- --L-- ----- --- -- ----
974 Soutt,_N_~c3_l~?!re~t_ 15-10-285-013 Dep_b~F>_~tt~ !150~_Wes_!_G~_n~s~Dii"'e f3e~d~~tial 1_ _ _ _ _
1 1saltLakeCityUT 84104 I -- - -I - - - -- - -
- -- -- -- -- -- --- -- ~ --- - - --- - - -- --l --- - --- - ------ ' - - - --- ----- --- -- -- ---- --- - +--- -- ------ - - ---
1 , , 1 •
- ---- -- -- -t --- --- -- - ---- - -- --- L__ --- - __ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ --+---·- _ __ __ __ __ --. _ __ __j_ _
121_3_ Wes_!__P_c3c;i_~c;_A_\l__en_t.1_e ~ 1 ~--_02~308-005 M_inerva _fJa_cl_ill§_ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ j 1~ 1_3_ 'A'~s_t_Pacific_ Avenue __ [f3~s~d~_11~a_l__j _
i I Salt Lake City UT 84104 i : - -- --- -- - - ~- - - --- -- - -- -- -- --- -- --- -- ---- --;- - -·-· --- ---- ---- ---,-- -- ---- --j-- ----------- -
I L ,
------ -- -- ----- -- - - '--- -- -- - - --- - -----+------ -- ---- ----- --- ---- - --- _J - -- - -- --- ---·------- -- - ---i-------- - ---- - ----
1 ,
- -- --- -- - - --- --- - ---- --- -- ----- - -- --· - --- -- --- -- - - - --- --- -t-: - ------------ -- --· -- - - -- - - --- _J_ - -- -- - --- -
1050 West Pierpont Ave. , 15-02-179-008 , Edward W & Gladys R Evans , 11991 South 2240 West Residential ' -~ _:~---- ~ ~- :=-~- -- ~-,~ ~~ ~~ ~ --~-~- ~--: -~ -= -=- ~ ~- -=- ~- _- ~- ~-lRiiertor1QT-84065_- ~~- ~-- ~-=:~ --~--=~-- - __ -__--_ ~ _
I
I
713SouthPostStreet -rf5~1f:26s--006- -- :vvelTsFargo-BankNA- - - - -'.347EfstatevfewBlvd- - - 'FfesidentTal_i - --- -
-- - - - ----- --- - -- --- -- -- --- -- --- --- ·- - - -- - - -- -- --- -- -- -- - - -+- -- -- - -- - - - - - - --- -- --- - --1 ---- - - -
. Fort Mills SC 29715 , 1
- --- ~- -- -- _ _j__ -- ------ --- - --+- -- ------ --- --- ------ - -- --- -+ - -- -- -- -- - -- - - - --- ----- --:--·-- -- --- -
' I -- -- - -- -- -- ------- -- - J - - -- -- - - l- - - ---- - - --- - - -- __ .j -- -- --- - --- --- - ------ -- -- ---- ---- ---+-------- -- -- -
921-923 So. Pueblo Street 115-10-280-002 Nathan Parkinson . PO Box 25785 1 Residential i _:= ~ ~--- -~~~ _- --~-~--------~--=- - __ -~ ~~ ~---: ~--~ _-_:_-~--- __ - -=-~: s~Tt i~ke ~ity~~Q_f ~4}_25 _- -~---- --~-----1--=---:-~- - -- __
! ------- --------- ; ------ -- -- 1--- ---------- --------------L------·- -- --·---
8~4 West Simondi Avenue l--08-35-257-027 1Claudia_& Elmer Dove .[_§928 South 'I' St~~- ~Residentia_!_ ~---- _
:
1
iTacorna WA 98408
--- --- -- - - -- -----+--- ------ -- -- - - -----+- -- --- --- -- -- ---- -- -- -·----+ ---- ----------- ----- -- - . - - __,_ ----- -- - -----
1 : i !
-- - - ----- - -- - - -- --- ---- --- [_ -- ·-- - - - - -. - ·--·-- •- -- - -- -- - -- - -•---·- --- ,----~---------
1616 W Snow Queen Pl 115-15-258-012 1 Hartland Apartments Utah LLC 137 Graham Street #200B · Residential 1 ---- - - --- ---- - - -- - -- - . ·-- -- -- --- -- -- ---- -·-------- ---·- --l-- --------- ------------ - -- -- -----·,-------- ---
-- ]_ ~o_!:l~n,_ilton ~a_11z~_&_Q_0_1!1P~QY __ j~n_Fr~~i~~o ~A_9412~ __ j_ ;_ _
-------------------- __ J __ ----·------------,---------------- - _L ------ - ----1-----
514 South Stewart Street 115-03-476-014 I Leticia Maldonado 1514 South Stewart Street Residential 1
- -- - ---· - - --- ---·-- --- --- - ,- -- - - - -- -- --- - - -•----- ------ -- ·- --· -- -·-- ------ --- ·--t·-- --------- - --
i i :saltLakeCityUT 84104 . : I I --- - - - -· -- -I -- -· - - ---
1 I , I --- - -- - -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - - - ---- rr --- - -- -- - --- ·- -- - -- ----- - - ---· ----- -- --- - - " -- ---- ·-- -~------- -- -- --- - ---
863 West 100 South 15-02-206-003 Curt D Warren 1864 West 100 South 'Residential : ----- -- - --- ---- -- --·-•--·-·- -- ---· ---·-"·--- ------·- ---·-- - -- ------·---------. --- ------- -- ---- -- 1----------------- ---
1 : Salt Lake City UT 84104 , : -- -- - -- - ---- -- - -- - - . -- - - -- ·- -. r -- --- - - -- -- --- -- - - -· -- -- --·- ------- ·-- -- - --- ·- -- - -- ---,- --- --- -- ·-- ·- --- -
I I I I
-- - -------------,------- --- - _j - --------------------------- _J_ --------------------- --
927 West 300 South l 15-02-257-002 I Ron Case 19288 South Janalee Drive Residential 1
--I--- -- -- --- -- -- ---t--- ---- - - - --------- - -- --- ------ --------- - -- -
' 1 West Jordan UT 84088 1 - -- ~---- -- ------ - -- -~- -- ------ -- __ - ---_--r -_ - ----- ------ ----_----- __ ;---~----- -~-= _-:_- _- ~ ~-- _- =-r-~-------
864 West 400 South ! 15-02-403-011 1"ongan United Methodist Church I PO Box 271026 , Residential ! --- -- -· - -- ·- ---· ---· - - - -·---- --. -t- --- -- ------- -- - - ·- -- --- ---- --- - - ---- --· -- __ , - - -· -· -
· of Salt Lake City I Salt Lake City UT 84127 , ---------- --·-- -- - -- -- 1-··-- --- - - - --------i- -- - - - ·--- --- -- -- ----- J__ __ ------- --- - ·-- - •-- --
' I --- - -----·--- - ----- -- -+--- ---- -- -- - -+ ---· ------- - - - - ---- - ~- -- -·-·-·--· -- -- --- __ 1_ --· -
1101 West 400 South • 15-02-334-007 , Charles D & Alma G Davis 1101 West 400 South / Residential ---- -- --- --- ----- -- -- -- - -- - -- ,-- - - -- - - - --- --- -- -- __ 1&iii [a1<e"gity_Ui--a4104- ~- _
---------- -
---- ---·-·- - - I - - - - --:- - --- --
-----~- - -- --'- --- - - - - - - --I ---- ----- ---- ----- -- - - - _L - - ---- -- - -- -- --- _.:__ ·---- -----+------- - --- ---
1429 West 400 South ', 15-03-427-017 Kinko M Taylor !2656 East Barbey Drive , Residential 1 ----- - - -- --·-- -~------- ----·- t----··--- ------------ ---- ------ ·------ --- -- ---- ,_ --- -------r-----~- - ---
, i Salt Lake City UT 84109 1 1 ----- - -- --- -- -- +- ------------- ---+ -- ---- ----- -- -- -- --- - --- +---- ---- - - - ------- +-- -- ---- -------,- -- -------
' I I ·, I •---· -- ---- ------ -- -- -- - --- --- - -- I,·-- --- - ---------- ---- -- -- ~ ------ ---- ---- - -·-"-· ·- --- -,----·---~-
844 West 500 South ~15_::!)~-407-01~_ ---+J-~hn__~_Dah~ @~~e~P~~ific~venu~ ~~~sidential
: · I Salt Lake City UT 84104 . ------------- - - ---·---- - ---- ---+---------------- --------------+---------- -----------·-r------·-
973 West 500 -South- - - · 15-02.:-451--::cfo2- ---- ;Empire Rec-reation fnc - ---- - --' 12142-south 3300 West - - ;s~JuT - - 'Residential, Partially
------- -- -- - ----- - --- -- ------- --~--- - -- - ---- ----------t------ - --
clo Michael Fountaine Riverton UT 84065 Residential 'Boarded, -------- ---- -I-- - -- --- - --+-------- ------- - - __ ] - -- - ---- --- ----,-~--- ----+-- ---
' I
- - -- -- -- - _J - - --- -- -·-- -- - ·4 - -- - - -- --- -- - -- - --- - -+ - ---- -- -- -- -- - - - ---- +- ---- -- -
765 West 800 South , 15-11-276-005 Robert B Sheldon 1354 East Tenth Avenue Residential i -=--~--- ----~-- - __ ~--~-------- - _ ~:~ _-_t_--= __ -~--=~---=~ _- ~--- -=---~ _[s~1t{ak_e ~itiD·(~41Q3 _-:- , -~-------=--t--_- -~~-- _ -_: _
• 15::-11-=221-=038 - - TMarylee -Eckman - - 182,fwest 860 South - - 1Reside-ntial - - - -
- ---- - -- -- - -, - ------ -- -- --- - - - -- - Salt T_ake Citil.rf 84-104 1-- ---- --- -- - -- - - - -
--1- ------------ ---- - ------ ---1--- ----- - -- -- ---- - ~---------- ---------- ------
' I
I I
1106Westaoo South - -T15-::-11-130-008 - --- ~WellFargoBankNA - - -- - 3476 Stateview-Bfvd- -- - -:ResTdential_T __ - - - -- - --
- - --- - - - --- ~ - -- --- -- ----4 - - --- -- - - - - -- - -- +- -- ---------- -- -------+-------,------ --------- ----·
: i 'Fort Mills SC 29715 ! I -- - --- -- ----- ---- -- -;------- -- - - --- -i- -- ------- ----- - --- --- -+- ---- --- --- - - - --- - + -- ---- -1--- - - ---- - ---
-- --- ------- --- -- -t-- -- -- -- -- -- I - - --- -- ----- - - - j_ ---- -- -- -- --·---------+ - ----+- -- - ----- - -
1107 West 800 South __ -~ 5-11-131-003 __ _1 Maka L & Vika P Vai _ _ _ _ _ 11448 South 1200 West _ _ )_Residential i _ __ _ _ _
_ _ _ __ _ --l : ~ _jSalt Lake City UT _§41_04 __ _j ---~ 1 _
824 West 800 South
-- - ------- - ---- -l- -------------- __ -----~---- I -------+----------,------ _
967 West 1700 South , 15-14-405-001 Page P Blakemore : 1005 East 3900 South i Residential ' - --- -- ------- - -- __ 1 ---- ---- ~- - - -- ----- -------- ---- ----------- --- --- -- - -- --- -,-------~ -- -- - --- -----
c/o Constitution Gas Transport Co ! Salt Lake City UT 84124 , ' --------- - - - --- - --------- - -,------------------------·----r----- ---- - -- - --- -~-----~-----t----------------------
1 I \
348 Norfh so6 West - - - !08--::35-279-014 - - + G-Blatne-& -Annemarie o 5avfa- -! 3144 E-asf Danish -RidgeWy ! Residential: - -- - - -
- - -- - -- - - --- -- _L -- ---- --- -- -- - I- - - - --- - -- -------- rt·--- ---- --- -- -- - --- -- +------- -t----- -- - -- - --
1 '1 Cottonwood Hgts UT 84121 1 · -~ -- -- --- - -- ~ -- - ,- -- --- - - -- - --- ---- -----1-- - -- --- - - ------- ~ ----- - +-------- -- - -- - -
' ' I - --- ---- - - -- ---- - - -- --- - - -- -- -- --- -- - l- -- - - ---- - --- -~ --- ------ +--- - - --- --- ---- - - -- - --+-
572 South 800 West i 15-02-476-017 I Deutsche Bank Trust Company 12650 Ingenuity Drive I Residential ---------------- - ---- --- - -~--- --- -- --- -- ------------ -----1------------ ----- ---- - ·r---------
1 ! 1 Orlando FL 32826 , ------- -------- - - --T- - --- ---------- ------- , - - ----- ----- --
819 South 800-West - 15-11-276-010 - :-Donald C Clark & Larry L Clark :488 West 3150 South !Residential ------- ------ -- - --- -- ----- +---- -- ---- -- ---- --- -- ----- ---L-- --- --- -- - -- -- - -- --r- --- --~ ~ --- ----- ---------
1 i Bountiful UT 84010 ,
,-- - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -+-- - --- ~ - - - - -----r-- ---- - - --- --- - -- -- -- -- --- - - -- - - --- -- -- -- -- ---+ -- -- - - -;-- -- - -- -- -- - - -
I I I i I ---------- ---- - - -L------ --- - ------, - -- -- - -- ---- - - - ---------- ---- --- - - - - --- - -1-- ----- -~·-- -- - --- - ----
1006 South 800 West · 15-11-426-009 Secretary of Housing & Urban Dev ! 4400 Will Rogers Pkwy Residential I
- -·- - -- - --·----- ---- ---- -- --- -- - --- --- -- -- ------ ------ - ----· ------- - ------~ - - --- --~-- ---,-- -- -- --- -- - ----
:c/o Connor & Boul Michaelson !Oklahoma City OK 73108 . 1 -------- -- -- -- -- - J ---- - --- - - --- -- --- -- ---- -- -- - - -- , --·----- - --- -- - -- ---- ~ --------r---- - - - --- --•
I l I I
3-56--North-900 West - - - -~08--35--257-019 - - - 1 Brandon Phillips-- -- - -- - - - !356 North 900-West - - Residential -r- -- --- - - --- - -----·--- ---- --- -~ --- --- ---------- ----- ------~----------- ---- ~---- ----- - ----- - - ----t- --------~- - --- -- -- --------
1 1 I Salt Lake City UT 84116 I
- - -- - - - - - - - -- -- y- -- - - - - -- -- -· - - -- - - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- --- -- - - - - - -- -- --- __ l _ ---- -- ~
' I I
. I , ' -~ ------ -- - -- - - ---~ --- -------- - '-- --- ----- ----- --- --- --- ~ ·--------- ~-- - --- --- ---1-- - -------,--- - - - - - - -
50~-~0l.l_th ~OQ We~t l 15_:-_9~-453-Q9_1 __ __ !Q_eo_r-ge_ & Stephanie Goldie ---~~:~ ~~~~=nix ~~070 +Residential +--- _
--------·- ----- ---- - --- -------- - ------ --------- ----------·--- ----r--- ------------- --- 0---------r--- -- --------
1 '
~1~--51_!3 ~ou_!h_90_Cl_ ~~t _ '.15~Q_2-j5~-Q_22 )5i111_b~rly F Hansen _ _ .~16_ S()_uth_ 90_0 \/v~st 8_e~id~n~al _ 1 _
, Salt Lake City UT 84104 1 - : - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - ~- -- -- - - -- I --- - -
I I
rzso south-906 WesC- -- 115-:-11-454.:-027 - --- t Milissa-Lyman - -- "307 East 5300South-- -- --1 ResTdential--1- -
-- - -- ------ --- - - -- -- ,-- -- - -- - -----1-- - --~------------ --- - --~ -- --- --- - --- ---- --- -- ,--- ------ -, - -
Murray UT 84107 , ·. ~- -- - -- -- - - - -- - --+ -- -- - -- -- -+ -- -
--r- - -- -- f-
I I I I
33~.f south -1606West -- -: 1 s--:02~31-026- -- - i Jorge col1azo.:-oe1gado &- - - - ~ 334 south 1 ooo-wesC - -- ;Residential -;- - - - - -- -
- - - - -- - - - -- i-- - - - - -- - - ;Ana Torres :Salt Lake City UT 84104 J_1 I
-- --- -- -- - - - - --- - ' - - - - - - -- - --'.-- -- -- - ------ -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- - - - --~ -- - I - --- - - --i- -- ---- --- - - -
--- --------- --,- - -- ---------.,------------------------ ----- - - --------------+------- ---,--------------
1~52 Sol.J_th_1_0_9_0_V\/_es_! _ ,_15_-14-2_Cl_3_-_9Q_8 J_P~uJ_M_§. _!;,'l_ari~ E_Y~rela _ _ _ 1 !45_9 §_outh _1_0QQ_\/v~s_!_ ---$~~i~~n_!ic1I ~ _
', i I Salt Lake City UT 84104 ! 1
--- --- - - - -- -- -- ----1- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -· ----------- ---- --- -- - - - ---t- - --- --- -- --- - ------r- ---- - - -f----- - --- ---- --- -
' I
637 south--1300-vvest --- 115-02::-356--ooEf -- --1 ManonT-Jones - --- -- --:25-86\Vest soosouth----~esidential--1 - - -
- - ~ I (salt Lake City UT 84104 : 1 - -
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
1/9/2013
i District #3 - Boarded
• Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments
579 W North Temple St 08-36-354-020 Grant Tower LLC 242 South 200 East Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84111
I District #3 - Vacant & Secured I
238 North 'B' Street 09-31-407-001 Craig R Vierig 5695 South Hihgland Drive Residential
Holladay UT 84121
658 North East Capitol St 09-31-104-043 Jeffrey E Adams 1448 West 950 North Residential
& Igor Maksymiw Provo UT 84604
1119 East First Avenue 09-32-481-016 Locke Avenues LLC 3500 Lenox Road #200 Residential
c/o One Alliance Center Atlanta GA 30326
417 North 'M' Street 09-32-178-015 Michael & Nuchanaad Martin 7948 South Old Flaxton Ct Residential
West Jordan UT 84081
524 East Ninth Avenue 09-31-282-009 Robert B Sheldon 354 East Tenth Avenue Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84103
214 East Tenth Avenue 09-31-176-001 Elsie M Knowlton 725 South 200 West #102 Residential
c/o Heather Knowlton Salt Lake City UT 84101
1076 East Third Avenue 09-32-4 76-005 Jeri Lou Coty 6721 South Bonham Lane Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84123
275 North Vine Street 08-36-433-002 Chad Spector 1909 Shadow Valley Drive Residential
Ogden UT 84403
572 North Wall Street 08-36-229-015 Derek S Miller 166 North 'T' Street Residential
c/o Lisa Miller Salt Lake City UT 84103
245 West 300 No #Rear 08-36-403-043 Charles D & Charles R Larsen 186 East Dorchester Drive Residential
c/o Dean Larsen Salt Lake City UT 84103
175 West 400 North 08-36-282-010 George A Venizelos 175 West 400 North 3-Mar Vacant Secured
Salt Lake City UT 84103 Residential
340 West 700 North 08-25-378-021 Michael W McKendrick 336 West 700 North Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84103
430 North 400 West 08-36-177 -008 Hansen Lance Partnership 2120 East 3900 South #301 Residential
c/o Gemm Properties Holladay UT 84124
585 North 400 West 08-36-128-031 Allen Jeppesen & 1346 North Colorado Street Commercial
Michael G Haslam Salt Lake City_ UT 84116
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
1/9/2013
i District 4 - Boarded i
Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments
836-838 S Jefferson St 15-12-254-027 Redevelopment Agency of PO Box 145518 Duplex Vacant/Secured
Salt Lake City Salt Lake City UT 84114 Residential PTB Expired 4/29/08
554 So McClelland St 16-05-452-018 Abana Apartment Co LTD 3006 South Highland Dr #200 Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84106
455 East Sego Avenue 16-06-461-018 Richard K Thomas Jr 167 West 1300 North 1992 PTB Expires
Sunset UT 84015 Residential 26-Aug
729 South 500 East 16-07-229-009 Susan A Brown PO Box 18488 Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84118
46 South 700 East 16-05-101-005 Northcliffe Ill LLC 780 East Northcliffe Drive Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84103
50 South 700 East 16-05-101-006 Northcliffe Ill LLC 780 East Northcliffe Drive May-89 PTB Exp 7/01
Salt Lake City UT 841 03 Residential
632 So 700 East #rear 16-05-353-014 Trolley Square Associates LLC 367 Trolley Square 1-Aug Permit Exp 10/9/02
c/o Dawn Katter Salt Lake City UT 84102 Residential
322 South 1100 East 16-05-402-026 V Paul Schaaf 1140 East Harrison Avenue 1-Sep Stay granted
Salt Lake City UT 84105 Residential Going to B.O.A.
219 West 200 South 15-01-254-018 Olafson II LLC 224 South 200 West 3-Sep Secured
c/o Jaye Olafson/T omax Salt Lake City UT 84101 Residential
566 West 200 South 15-01-108-011 Mary M Drasbek 530 Utterback Store Road Residential
Great Falls VA 22066 Jul-06
40-52 East 300 South 16-06-153-005 International Investment & 4505 So Wasatch Blvd #215 Commercial
Development Corporation Salt Lake City UT 84124
69 West 300 South 15-01-281-001 David W Bernolfo 163 South Main Street Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84111
666 East 300 South 16-05-154-003 Vincent Court LLC 655 East 400 South #200 PRE 1998 PTB 10-06
Salt Lake City UT 84102 Residential
4 79 East 400 South 16-06-403-018 Grey Oak LLC 2157 South Lincoln Street Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84106
652 East 600 South 16-05-353-001 Trolley Square Associates LLC 367 Trolley Square PRE 1990 Exp, 10/09/05
c/o Dawn Katter Salt Lake City UT 84102 Residential
345 West 700 South 15-12-130-027 Urban Blue Development LLC 250 East 100 South Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84111
349 West 700 South 15-12-130-002 Urban Blue Development LLC 726 East Sixth Avenue Commercial Fire damage
Salt Lake City UT 84103 6-Jul
29 East 900 South 16-07-151-020 Ninth Street Development LLC PO Box 65809 Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84165
110 West 900 South 15-12-276-034 Manier lsho & Ronzik Simon 110 West 900 South Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84101
501 East 900 South 16-07-276-028 MB Rentco LLC 8 East Hillside Ave #801 Spring 1997 PTB Exp 3/01/06
Salt Lake City UT 84103 Commercial
521 East 900 South 16-07-276-031 Lionel M Drage 3830 South 2900 East 2/24/2004
c/o Filia H Uipi Salt Lake City UT 84109 Residential
643 South 400 West 15-01-380-011 Ameritel Inn Elko LLC 10200 West Emerald Street Commercial
Boise ID 83704
1District #4 - Vacant & Secured I
925 East East Place 16-05-332-013 Kay H Christensen 925 East East Place 4-Sep Boarded
Salt Lake City UT 84102 Residential
835 South Edison St 16-07-176-042 Wagner Biomedical Inc 6037 South Highland Drive Residential
Holladay UT 84121
755 South Elizabeth St 16-08-229-009 Susan R Fulsome 755 South Elizabeth Street Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84102
354 South Strongs Ct 16-05-326-015 Clark WMiles PO Box 25083 Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84125
825 So Washington St 15-12-253-003 SNT Enterprises LC 231 West 800 South #A Residential Active permits
Salt Lake City UT 84101 Sep-06
831 So Washington St 15-12-253-004 SNT Enterprises LC 231 West 800 South #A 5-Apr VacanVSecure
Salt Lake City UT 84101 Residential Closed to Occupancy
123 S West Temple St 15-01-229-012 VMM Arrow Press LLC 51 East 400 South #210 Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84111
643 South 300 East 16-06-386-002 Wells Fargo Bank NA One Home Campus Residential
Des Moines IA 50328
541-543 So 500 East 16-06-4 7 6-041 Autonomy Incorporated 6036 South Linden Street Residential
Holladay UT 84121
780 South 500 East 16-07-210-022 Joseph Shoal 2388 East 1700 South Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84108
634 South 700 East 16-05-353-012 Martha Daniels 1960 South 400 East Apr-99 Vacant Secure
c/o Janie M Durham Salt Lake City UT 84115 Residential CTO Fire damage
320-322 So 900 East 16-05-327-011 Sundar Sathiyanathan 1104 East 600 South Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84102
543 South 1000 East 16-05-452-006 Lewis J Paskett 369 East 900 South #132 Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84111
45 East 200 South 16-06-151-006 Alice Hsia PO Box 80804 Commercial
San Marino CA 91118
279 East 300 South 16-06-179-025 Telephone & Telegraph 230 East South Tempie Street Residential
Exchange Building LLC Salt Lake City UT 84111
540 East 500 South 16-06-4 76-032 SCP 500 South LLC 500 No Market Place Drive Residential
Centerville UT 84014
563-565 East 600 So 16-06-4 77 -023 Toshia Osaka 4446 South Adonis Drive Residential Vacant duplex
Salt Lake City UT 84124
319 East 800 South 16-07-131-004 Tuy-Hong Vo PO Box 651553 Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84165
149 East 900 South 16-07-176-016 Bonnie Miller Investments LTD 292 East 12200 South #100 Commercial
Draper UT 84020 Rehab w/permits
839 South 200 West 15-12-254-008 Redevelopment Agency of SLC PO Box 145518 Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84114
244 South 500 West 15-01-152-022 Randall M Browning 1085 North 1200 East Commercial
Bountiful UT 84010
161 South 600 West 15-01-108-008 E Jex & Jeannine Hepworth LLC 708 East Riverview Circle Commercial
Pine ID 83647
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
1/9/2013
•
District #5 - Boarded
• Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments
1856 South Edison Street 16-18-308-011 Douglas C & Linda H Bott 1863 South State Street 1996 Permit Exp. 11/30/2004
486-1691 Salt Lake City UT 84115 Residential BOA Commercial Appeal
1875 South Edison Street 16-18-333-006 Wade Rees Real Estate LLC PO Box 1190 Residential
Riverton UT 84065
365 East Harvard Avenue 16-07-405-013 Kathryn Lichfield 3045 East 2965 South Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84109
915-17 South Jefferson St 15-12-279-004 Dwight Laird LLC 1182 East Laird Avenue 6/4/1999 No Permit to Board
Salt Lake City UT 84105 Residential
1241 South Major Street 16-07 -353-009 Free Wesleyan Church of 57 East 1300 South Commercial
Tonga in Utah Salt Lake City UT 84115
1359 South Major Street 16-18-102-001 Aurora Loan Services LLC 2617 College Park Drive Residential
Scottsbluff NE 69361
1815 South State Street 16-18-306-004 MFFP LLC Series Dad's Store 170 West Rosewood Circle Commercial
AKA 1811 & 1819 S State Centerville UT 84014
154 West Westwood Ave 15-13-4 78-020 Jenny Lopez 154 West Westwood Avenue Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84115
1087 South 1300 East 16-08-433-023 Tyler S Gourley PO Box 526319 Residential
& Julie Christenson Salt Lake City UT 84152
I District #5 - Vacant & Secured I
60 East Bryan Avenue 16-18-155-004 Gene L & Shirley S Evans 60 East Bryan Avenue Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84115
23 East Cleveland Avenue 16-18-101-020 Dan Garzarelli 1813 South 1500 East Residential Boarded no PTB
Salt Lake City UT 84105 6-Jun Junk/Tire Storage
1001 South Denver Street 16-07-403-005 Beneficial Mortgage Company PO Box 4153-K Residential
Carol Stream IL 60197
1852 South Edison Street 16-18-308-01 0 Blaine E & Phyllis J Tanner 1833 South State Street Residential
c/o Tanner Transmissions Inc Salt Lake City UT 84115
254 West Fayette Avenue 15-12-257-023 Ronald H & Danielle K 514 North Locust Avenue Residential Vacant Duplex
Torgersen Lindon UT 84042
1363 South Filmore Street 16-16-127-003 H Ken Engeman 1435 East Yale Avenue Residental
Salt Lake City UT 84105
856 East Harrison Avenue 16-17-127-012 Solomon Investments LLC 64 East Kaysville Ct Residental
Draper UT 84020
16 East Kensington Avenue 16-18-151-005 Mesa Development Inc PO Box 828 Commercial
c/o Nathan Coulter Sandy UT 84091
135 West Layton Avenue 15-13-4 76-010 Jesse Wright 135 West Layton Avenue Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84115
1367 South Lincoln Street 16-17 -132-005 Carl E Connelly 2263 E High Mountain Drive Residential
Sandy UT 84092
1497 South Main Street 16-18-104-019 Won June Lee 4372 South Bouck Circle Commercial
West Valley UT 84120
1779 South Main Street 16-18-301-013 Eduardo Rojas 1099 South West Temple St Residential
Salt Lake City_ UT 84101
1341 East Michigan Avenue 16-09-153-062 Constance K & Scott S Maves 3100 E Carrigan Canyon Drive 6-Aug
Salt Lake City UT 84109 Residential
771 East Roosevelt Avenue 16-17-107-031 Keith S Lund 771 East Roosevelt Avenue Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84105
1149 So West Temple St 15-12-431-004 Todd W Gee 1145 South West Temple St Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84101
1500 So West Temple St 15-13-232-015 Micheal J Pehrson 1500 South West Tempie St. Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84115
1044 East Wood Avenue 16-17-253-010 Claudia S & J Douglas 4693 Madison Residential
Jacobsen - c/o Sallee Orr Ogden UT 84403
1050 East Wood Avenue 16-17-253-011 Claudia A & J Douglas 4693 Madison Avenue Residential
Jacobsen - c/o Sallee Orr Ogden UT 84403
150 East 1300 South 16-07-379-001 Quality for Animal Life Inc 6037 South Highland Drive #2 Residential
Holladay UT 84121
18 West 1700 South 15-13-282-011 James H Hatch 838 North Main Street Residential
Farmington UT 84025
28 West 1700 South 15-13-282-010 James H Hatch 838 North Main Street Residential
Farmington UT 84025
36 West 1700 South 15-13-282-009 James H Hatch 838 North Main Street Residential
Farmington UT 84025
1430 South 400 East 16-18-204-026 Steve Atkin & Jim Arthur 1426 South 400 East Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84115
1321 South 500 East 16-07-478-015 Michael C Lobb 1714 South 1100 East Residential
c/o Service First Realty Group Salt Lake City UT 84105
2038 South 500 East 16-19-202-013 Chung-Ji Dai & Chung Chu-Dai 4780 South Fortuna Way Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84124
1081 South 1300 East 16-08-433-025 Kirkland D & Lariane A King 13306 South Bellevue Way Residential
c/o K&LK Trust Draper UT 84020
909 South 200 West 15-12-259-003 909 South Properties LLC 3366 West 9000 South Residential
c/o Harvey E Pulley West Jordan UT 84088
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
1/9/2013
Address Sidwell No.
1316 E Downington Ave 16-17-430-001
1456 East Logan Avenue 16-16-157-009
2134 East Roosevelt Ave 16-15-110-005
I District #6 - Boarded I
Owner's Address
PO Box 520638
Salt Lake City UT 84152
858 South 300 East
Salt Lake City UT 84111
1320 East 500 South #112
Salt Lake City UT 84102
Boarded*
4-Mar
Residential
Residential
Residential
Comments
Duplex
Vacant
Owner
Roger Swensen
IDistrict #6 - Vacant & Secured I
Gary L Beard
Ann R Cunningham
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
1/9/2013
I District #7 - Boarded I
Address Sidwell No. Owner Owner's Address Boarded* Comments
2818 South Highland Drive 16-29-229-002 John E Arrington 1921 East Summer Willow Pl Residential Vacant Partial Boarded
c/o Craiag P Arrington Sandy UT 84093
880 East 21 00 South 16-20-129-019 921 Properties LC 4070 South Evelyn Drive Commercial
aka 2110 South 900 East c/o B G Russell Salt Lake City UT 84124
2849 South 900 East 16-29-130-005 Robert Seeley 2849 South 900 East Residential
Salt Lake City UT 84106
IDistrict #7 - Vacant & Secured i
2624 So Elizabeth Street 16-20-455-018 Joseph T & Natalie C Richmond 800 Braesgreen Drive Residential
Round Rock TX 78664
2855 South Highland Drive 16-29-235-007 DTRL & Associates LLC 1127 West Dalton Avenue Commercial
Salt Lake City UT 84104
984 East Wilson Avenue 16-17-333-015 Manoochehr Khavari 2700 West 2nd Street Residential
c/o Khavar Rohat Abadi Roswell NM 88201
2165 South 2100 East 16-22-107-008 Robert 8 Sheldon 354 East Tenth Avenue Residential Vacant Partial Boarded
Salt Lake City UT 84103
RDA AND HOUSING TRUST FUND QUARTERLY REPORTS LEDGER
Second Quarter - 2012-13
2012-13 - RDA HOUSING TRUST FUND CREDIT DEBIT BALANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE as of September 30, 2012 1,750,000.00
2012-13 - HOUSING TRUST FUND CREDIT DEBIT BALANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE as of September 30, 2012 2,830,002.17
Quarterly Subdivision Housing Report
For the Quarter From October 2012 to December 2012
XR'p~*\~»J!f:8: ~,', ~~"tDr11~!11~i:
Preliminary Plats*
10/3/2012 Planning Commission 596 N Wall Street, Minor Sub. 596 N WALL St 2 Res
10/8/2012 Planning Commission Presidential Villas Plat amendment 925 S DONNER Way 0 Res modify lotline
10/17/2012 Planning Commission 24 and 9 2442 S 900 E, Minor Sub. 2442 S 900 E 3 Res
10/24/2012 Planning Commission 571 N Redwood Rd, Minor Sub 571 NREDWOODRd 2 Com
11/15/2012 Administrative 718 N 5600 W Preliminary Subdivision 718 N 5600 W 2 Com
Hearing
11/15/2012 Administrative 2819 W 500 S Minor Subdivision 2819 W 500 S 2 Res
Hearing
Quarter Totals Lots/ Units 11
Preliminary*
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
This form is to be used to report on the funding provided by Salt Lake City for this grant.
Do not report 1000/o of your programmatic results unless Salt Lake City CDBG fully funded your program.
FY 12/ 13:I ._ l_st_Q..,.t_r_,. =...._._I 2_n_d_Qt_,.__r.-=-X-=.a.!_3r_d_Qt...__r.-==-'-l 4_t_h_Q.._t_r.-==....., Date Submitted: ._I 1.,_/1_5;..:./_2_0 __ 13'-'I
Name of Subrecipient: Community Developmnt Corporation of Utah
Name of Program: Administration
Contact Person: Jean Barton )Phone#: 801-994-7222 I Email: jean@cdcutah.org
SECTION I • PROJECT DESCRIPTION & STATUS
SECTION II - RACE/ETHNICITY
, otar 'If ::,ervea , n.1.::, rnspamcr
Race Category Qtr Latino
White 5 1
Black or African American
Asian 1
American Indian or Alaskian Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American
Multi-Racial Other
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 7 1
SECTION III • BENEFICARY INCOME
Income Category New/Continuing access to Improved access to Service or Service or Infrastructure no
(Median Family Income) Service or Infrastructure Infrastructure longer substandard
extrerneiv LOW
(<30% MFI}
very LOW
(31% to 50% MFI)
LOW/MOO
(51%-79% MFI) 7
nu11·1-uw '"'""'
(>800/o MFI}
Totals: 7 0 0
SECTION IV - ACCESS TO SERVICES
Of All Reported Beneficiaries, How Many Are: # Clients
1. Disabled 0
2. Single Female Head of Household (with children under the age of 18) 2
SECTION V - PROGRAM FUNDS (List all sources of funding utilized in supporting this program)
PROGRAM FUNDS AMOUNT
ESG Funds
HOME Funds
HOPWA Funds
Other Federal Funds (including CDBG from other sources) $ 25,698.80
State/Local Funds
Private Funds
Other
Total $ 25,698.80
SECTION VI - HOUSING INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
Of Owner Occupied Units: # Units
1. Units Occupied by Elderly: 0
2. Units Moved from Substandard to Standard (HQS or Local Code) 0
3. Section 504 Accessible Units 0
4. Units Qualified as Energy Star 0
5. Units Brought into Compliance with Lead Safety Rules (24 CFR Part 35) 0
LBP Requirements: # Units
1. Housing Constructed pre 1978
2. Exempt Housing Constructed post 1978 0
3. Otherwise Except 0
4. Except: No Paint Disturbed 0
Lead Hazard Remediation Actions: (For REHAB ONLY) # Units
1. Lead Safe Work Practices (24 CFR 35.930(b)) (Hard Costs <=$5,000) 0
2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices ( 24 CFR 35.930 ( c)) (Hard Costs $5,000 - $25,000) 0
3. Abatement (24 CFR 35.930 (d)) (Hard Costs> $25,000) 0
SECTIOIN VII - RENTER INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
IUI.CII -H
Race Category (Renters) Served THIS Hispanic/ Income Category
Report "OWNERS" in Section II Qtr Latino Report "OWNERS" IN SECTION 111 Renters
White 0 Extremely Low ( <30% MFI) 0
Black or African American 0 Very Low (31%-50% MFI) 0
Asian 0 Low/Mod (51%-79% MFI) 0
American Indian or Alaskian Native u Non-Low Mod (>Huu10 Ml"lJ 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0
American Indian or Alaska Native & White 0
Asian and White 0
Black or African American & White 0
Am Indian/ Alaska Native & Black/ African Am 0
Multi-Racial Other 0
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 0 0
SECTION VIII: SHELTER ACTIVITIES - FILL IN SHADED AREAS ONLY
** This section is to be filled out by: CCS, Road Home, YWCA and any other organization that received funding under the "PUBLIC
SERVICE" category of the CDBG grant that provides support to Homeless individuals/families.
Of the total number of persons assisted: # Persons
Homeless Persons given Overnight Shelter 0
Beds Created (w / this funding) in Overnight Shelter 0
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
HOME quarterly reports shall be due to Salt Lake City no later than October 31, January 31, ,
April 30, , and July 31,. In addition to the quarterly reports, the annual report shall also be due
no later than July 31, 2013. Submit all reports to:
Steven Akerlow Phone: 535-7115
Housing & Neighborhood Development
451 South State St., Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5488
NAME OF SUBGRANTEE ORGANIZATION: _Comunity Development Corporation of Utah_
PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME:
_Acquisition/Rehabilitation _
CONTACT NAME:_Jean Barton. CONTACT PHONE: 801-994-7222_
CONTACT ADDRESS:_501 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106 _
CONTACT EMAIL:jean@cdcutah.org _
TIME PERIOD COVERED: __ 10-1-2012 __ to _12-31-2012 _
Month Day Year Month Day Year
Report the total number of clients served in the first column. In the second column report the
number of clients counted in the first column also claiming Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. If clients
only claim Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, include them first in the White race column. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
CODE RACE/ETHNICITY Total Number Hispanic
14 American Indian or Alaska Native - 0
16 American Indian or Alaska Native and White - 0
19 American Indian or Alaska Native and Black - 0
or African American
13 Asian - 0
17 Asian and White _o
12 Black or African American _o
18 Black or African American and White _o
15 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander - 0
11 White - 0
20 Balance of individuals reporting more than one race - 0
TOTALS -- 0
INCOME INFORMATION
Indicate below the number of households/persons served in each income category below.
Please indicate whether you are serving households (H) or persons (P). Total numbers from
Income Information must match those from the Race/Ethnicity totals above. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
Number of clients assisted at 30% AMI or lower
Number of clients assisted between 31 % and 50% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 51 % and 60% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 61 % and 80% AMI
Total Number of Households/Persons Served during the Quarter:
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
FAIR HOUSING DATA
Number of clients assisted that are disabled
Number of clients assisted that are Female Head of Household
(must have children under the age of 18)
__ o __
__ o __
HOUSING ACTIVITIES NONE THIS QUARTER
Types of housing activities: Rental housing development, property acquisition for home buyer
development, home owner housing development, home buyer assistance, housing rehabilitation
and tenant based rental assistance.
Types of activities NOT considered housing activities: Emergency shelter assistance and short-
term assistance to support homeless persons are considered public service activities, not
housing activities.
Homebuyer Assistance Activities:
Types of homebuyer assistance housing activities: Down payment and closing cost assistance,
gap financing, interest rate buy-downs, and subsidized second mortgages.
Of the total number of persons assisted, how many:
Are first time home buyers _O _
Are receiving down payment/closing cost assistance _o _
Are coming from subsidized housing _o _
Are receiving housing counseling _o _
Total number of housing units in entire project: _o _
Of those, how many are HOME assisted _o _
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards _o _
Of those, how many are HOME assisted _o _
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards _o _
Of those, how many are HOME assisted _o _
Homebuyer Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted:
Homebuyer Development Activities:
Types of homebuyer development housing activities: Property acquisition for homebuyer
housing development, new construction of homebuyer units and rehabilitation of existing units
for resale to homebuyers.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of those, how many units are restricted for those at 80% AMI
or less whether HOME assisted or not
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility:
Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed:
Number for households previously living in subsidized housing
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Rental Housing Activities NONE
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
Types of rental housing activities: Acquisition of existing units for rent, property acquisition for
new construction of rental units, new construction of rental units, rehabilitation of existing rental
units, and conversion of nonresidential structures into rental units.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed: NONE
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of years the project will remain affordable
Number of units subsidized with project-based rental assistance
by another federal, state or local program
Number of units designated for homeless persons and families
including units receiving assistance for operations
__ NIA_
_NIA_
_NIA_
_N/A_
_N/A
Types of homeowner rehabilitation activities: All activities designed to make physical
improvements to owner-occupied housing units.
Total number of units in the entire homeowner housing rehab project:
Of those, the number of units to be occupied by the elderly
(62 and older)
Units moved from substandard to standard (HQS or local code)
Units qualified as meeting Energy Star Standards
Units made accessible that now meet Section 504 Standards
Units brought into compliance with lead safety rules
Types of tenant-based rental assistance activities: All direct rental assistance to tenants
(TBRA), and short-term assistance to households including security deposits.
Total number of households assisted:
Of those, how many receive short-term rental assistance
(not more than 3 mos.)
Of those, the number of chronically homeless households
Total number of housing units in entire program:
Of those, the number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, the number designated for the chronically homeless
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless
Permanent housing units designated for homeless persons and
families including units receiving assistance for operations
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless
Homeowner Rehabilitation NONE
Rehab Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted, if applicable:
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance NONE
Was this activity carried out by a faith-based organization? YES __ NO __
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
This form is to be used to report on the funding provided by Salt Lake City for this grant.
Do not report 1000/o of your programmatic results unless 5alt Lake City CDBG fully funded your program.
FY12/13: !lstQtr.= !2ndQtr. x:)3rdQtr, !4th Qtr. Date Submitted: L 1.._/7....,/'-2_0_1__.3 !
Name of Subrecipient: NeighborWorks Salt Lake
Name of Program:
Contact Person: Geoff Hardies I Phone#: 801.539,1590 I Email: geoff@nwsaltlake.org
SECTION I • PROJECT DESCRIPTION & STATUS
SECTION II - RACE/ETHNICITY
1ota1,; ~ervea 1r11~ mspamc)
Race Category Qtr Latino
White 1 1
Black or African American 0 0
Asian 0 0
American Indian or Alasklan Native 0 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native & White 0 0
Asian and White 0 0
Black or African American & White 0 0
American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American 0 0
Multi-Racial Other 0 0
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 1 1
SECTION III • BENEFICARY INCOME
Income Category New/Continuing access to Improved access to Service or Service or Infrastructure no
(Median Family Income) Service or Infrastructure Infrastructure longer substandard
exrremeiv Low
(<300/o MFI) 0 0 0
very LOW
(31% to 500/o MFI) 0 0 0
LOW/MOO
(51%-790/o MFI) 1 0 0
nun"LOW l'IUU
(>800/o MFI) 0 0 0
Totals: 1 0 0
SECTION IV - ACCESS TO SERVICES
Of All Reported Beneficiaries, How Many Are: # Clients
1. Disabled 0
2. Single Female Head of Household (with children under the age of 18) 0
SECTION V • PROGRAM FUNDS (list all sources of funding utilized in supporting this program)
PROGRAM FUNDS AMOUNT
ESG Funds $ -
HOME Funds $ 171,422.00
HOPWA Funds $ -
Other Federal Funds (including CDBG from other sources) $ 60,000.00
State/Local Funds $ -
Private Funds $ 42,000.00
Other $ -
Total $ 273,422.00
SECTION VI - HOUSING INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
Of Owner Occupied Units:
# Units
1, Units Occupied by Elderly:
2. Units Moved from Substandard to Standard (HQS or Local Code)
3, Section 504 Accessible Units
4. Units Qualified as Energy Star
5. Units Brought into Compliance with Lead Safety Rules (24 CFR Part 35)
LBP Requirements:
# Units
1. Housing Constructed pre 1978
2. Exempt Housing Constructed post 1978
3. Otherwise Except
4. Except: No Paint Disturbed
Lead Hazard Remediation Actions: (For REHAB ONLY) # Units
1, Lead Safe Work Practices (24 CFR 35.930(b)) (Hard Costs <=$5,000)
2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices ( 24 CFR 35.930 ( c)) (Hard Costs $5,000 - $25,000)
3. Abatement (24 CFR 35.930 (d)) (Hard Costs > $25,000)
SECTIOIN VII - RENTER INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
IULGI 'ff
Race Category (Renters) Served THIS Hispanic/ Income Category
Report "OWNERS" in Section II Qtr Latino Report "OWNERS" IN SECTION Ill Renters
White Extremely Low 1 <30% MFI)
Black or African American Very Low (31%-50% MFI
Asian Low/Mod (51%-79% MFI;
American Indian or Alaskian Native Non-Low Mod (>1juv10 Mfl;
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
Am Indian/ Alaska Native & Black/ African Am
Multi-Racial Other
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 0 0
SECTION VIII: SHELTER ACTIVITIES - FILL IN SHADED AREAS ONLY
** This section is to be filled out by: CCS, Road Home, YWCA and any other organization that received funding under the "PUBLIC
SERVICE" category of the CDBG grant that provides support to Homeless individuals/families.
Of the total number of persons assisted: # Persons
Homeless Persons given Overnight Shelter
Beds Created (w/ this funding) in Overnight Shelter
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
HOME quarterly reports shall be due to Salt Lake City no later than October 31, January 31, ,
April 30, , and July 31,. In addition to the quarterly reports, the annual report shall also be due
no later than July 31, 2013. Submit all reports to:
Steven Akerlow Phone: 535-7115
Housing & Neighborhood Development
451 South State St., Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5488
NAME OF SUBGRANTEE ORGANIZATION: NeighborWorks Salt Lake
PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME:--------------------
CONTACT NAME: Geoff Hardies CONTACT PHONE: 801.539.1590
CONTACT ADDRESS:622 W 500 N SLC, UT 84116
CONTACT EMAIL: geoff@nwsaltlake.org
TIME PERIOD COVERED: _10/01/12 to 12/31/12
Month Day Year Month Day Year
Report the total number of clients served in the first column. In the second column report the
number of clients counted in the first column also claiming Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. If clients
only claim Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, include them first in the White race column. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
CODE RACE/ETHNICITY Total Number Hispanic
14 American Indian or Alaska Native -- 0 - 0
16 American Indian or Alaska Native and White -- 0 - 0
19 American Indian or Alaska Native and Black o __ - 0
or African American
13 Asian -- 0 - 0
17 Asian and White -- 2 - 0
12 Black or African American -- 0 - 0
18 Black or African American and White -- 0 _o __
15 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander -- 0 _o __
11 White -- 0 _o __
20 Balance of individuals reporting more than one race - 0
0
TOTALS -- 2 - 0
INCOME INFORMATION
Indicate below the number of households/persons served in each income category below.
Please indicate whether you are serving households (H) or persons (P). Total numbers from
Income Information must match those from the Race/Ethnicity totals above. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
Number of clients assisted at 30% AMI or lower
Number of clients assisted between 31% and 50% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 51 % and 60% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 61 % and 80% AMI
Total Number of Households/Persons Served during the Quarter:
FAIR HOUSING DATA
Number of clients assisted that are disabled
Number of clients assisted that are Female Head of Household
(must have children under the age of 18)
HOUSING ACTIVITIES
__ o __
__ 1 __
__ o __
__ 1
__ 2. __
__ 1
Types of housing activities: Rental housing development, property acquisition for home buyer
development, home owner housing development, home buyer assistance, housing rehabilitation
and tenant based rental assistance.
Types of activities NOT considered housing activities: Emergency shelter assistance and short-
term assistance to support homeless persons are considered public service activities, not
housing activities.
Homebuyer Assistance Activities:
Types of homebuyer assistance housing activities: Down payment and closing cost assistance,
gap financing, interest rate buy-downs, and subsidized second mortgages.
Of the total number of persons assisted, how many:
Are first time home buyers
Are receiving down payment/closing cost assistance
Are coming from subsidized housing
Are receiving housing counseling
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Homebuyer Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted:
Homebuyer Development Activities:
Types of homebuyer development housing activities: Property acquisition for homebuyer
housing development, new construction of homebuyer units and rehabilitation of existing units
for resale to homebuyers.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of those, how many units are restricted for those at 80% AMI
or less whether HOME assisted or not
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility:
Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed:
Number for households previously living in subsidized housing
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
_24 _
_17 _
_22 _
_o _
__ o __
_o _
_o _
Rental Housing Activities
Types of rental housing activities: Acquisition of existing units for rent, property acquisition for
new construction of rental units, new construction of rental units, rehabilitation of existing rental
units, and conversion of nonresidential structures into rental units.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed:
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of years the project will remain affordable
Number of units subsidized with project-based rental assistance
by another federal, state or local program
Number of units designated for homeless persons and families
including units receiving assistance for operations
__ 2, __
__ 2 __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ 15 __
__ o __
__ o __
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless _o _
Permanent housing units designated for homeless persons and _o _
families including units receiving assistance for operations
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless _o _
Homeowner Rehabilitation
Types of homeowner rehabilitation activities: All activities designed to make physical
improvements to owner-occupied housing units.
Total number of units in the entire homeowner housing rehab project:
Of those, the number of units to be occupied by the elderly
(62 and older)
Units moved from substandard to standard (HQS or local code)
Units qualified as meeting Energy Star Standards
Units made accessible that now meet Section 504 Standards
Units brought into compliance with lead safety rules
Rehab Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted, if applicable:
_n/a _
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
Types of tenant-based rental assistance activities: All direct rental assistance to tenants
(TBRA), and short-term assistance to households including security deposits.
Total number of households assisted:
Of those, how many receive short-term rental assistance
(not more than 3 mos.)
Of those, the number of chronically homeless households
Total number of housing units in entire program:
Of those, the number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, the number designated for the chronically homeless
Was this activity carried out by a faith-based organization? YES --
_n/a. _
NO __
Rocky Mountain Region
HUD Region VIII
(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming)
U.S. Housing Market Conditions Report - 3rd quarter 2012
Economic growth continued in the Rocky Mountain region during the third quarter of 2012. During the 12
months ending September 2012, nonfarm payrolls in the region averaged approximately 5.05 million jobs, an
increase of 95,400 jobs, or 1.9 percent, compared with a year earlier. Employment levels nearly recovered to
the previous peak, recorded in 2008, when nonfarm payrolls averaged 5.12 million jobs. The greatest job
gains occurred in the professional and business services, education and health services, and manufacturing
sectors, which increased by approximately 23,400, 12,500, and 9,400 jobs, or 3.8, 1.9, and 2.8 percent,
respectively. In addition, the mining and logging and the retail trade subsectors added 8,900 and 7,600 jobs,
increases of 9.5 and 1.4 percent, respectively. Losses in the information and government sectors, which
decreased by 500 and 2,900 jobs, or 0.4 and 0.3 percent, respectively, partially offset those gains. Although
state government subsector payrolls increased by 3,500 jobs, or 1.4 percent, local government and federal
government subsector payrolls declined by 1,900 and 4,600 jobs, or 0.3 and 3.4 percent, respectively. During
the 12 months ending September 2012, the unemployment rate averaged 6.6 percent for the region, down
from 7.3 percent a year earlier. Within the region, state unemployment rates ranged from 3.1 percent in
North Dakota to 8.0 percent in Colorado, but the rates for all six states in the region remained below the
national average of 8.3 percent.
For the eighth consecutive quarter, North Dakota had the highest rate of job growth, not only within the
region, but also in the nation. Nonfarm payrolls in the state increased by 24,100 jobs, or 6.2 percent. The
mining and logging subsector, which grew by 5,700 jobs, or 38 percent, led the growth, largely because of oil
exploration and production in the Bakken Shale formation in western North Dakota. In addition, the
construction and the transportation and utilities subsectors in North Dakota increased by 3,400 and 3,100
jobs, or 15 and 17 percent, respectively. Colorado had the greatest job gain in the region, with nonfarm
payrolls increasing by 38,200 jobs, or 1.7 percent. The sectors with the greatest increases were the
professional and business services, leisure and hospitality, and education and health services sectors, which
grew by 10,900, 7,100, and 6,000 jobs, or 3.2, 2.6, and 2.2 percent, respectively. The information sector
partially offset this growth, decreasing by 2,000 jobs, or 2.8 percent, led by a decline in telecommunications
payrolls in the Denver area. In Utah, nonfarm payrolls grew by 27,500 jobs, or 2.3 percent, led by gains in the
professional and business services and the manufacturing sectors, which added 7,600 and 4,400 jobs,
increases of 4.8 and 3.9 percent, respectively. Job growth was weaker in Wyoming, South Dakota, and
Montana, where nonfarm payrolls increased by 2,500, 2,100, and 1,000 jobs, or 0.9, 0.5, and 0.2 percent,
respectively. In Wyoming, payrolls increased in the mining and logging and the retail trade subsectors by 900
and 700 jobs, or 3.4 and 2.4 percent, respectively, but decreased in the construction subsector by 500 jobs,
or 2.4 percent. In South Dakota, the education and health services and the manufacturing sectors added
1,400 and 1,200 jobs, increases of 2.1 and 3.1 percent, respectively, but those gains were partially offset by
decreases in the leisure and hospitality and the government sectors, which declined by 1,000 and 700 jobs, or
2.3 and 0.9 percent, respectively. In Montana, the professional and business services sector and the
construction subsector increased by 1,600 and 1,500 jobs, or 4.0 and 6.6 percent, respectively, but the
government sector decreased by 2,800 jobs, or 3.1 percent.
As the economy expanded during the past year, sales housing markets in the Rocky Mountain region
strengthened, although conditions remain slightly soft in most areas. According to data from CoreLogic, Inc.,
home sales increased in most states of the region. In Colorado and Utah, approximately 87,500 and 43,100
existing homes sold during the 12 months ending August 2012, increases of 13 and 6 percent, respectively. In
Montana, North Dakota, and Wyoming, approximately 12,900, 12,700, and 5,400 existing homes sold,
increases of 3, 17, and 9 percent, respectively. Home sales prices also increased throughout the region. Based
on the CoreLogic, Inc. Home Price Index, average sales prices for existing single-family homes during the 12
months ending August 2012 were up 4 percent in North Dakota, compared a year earlier. Prices were up 3
percent in Montana, South Dakota, and Utah, and prices were up 2 percent in Colorado and 1 percent in
Wyoming. A decline in the number of troubled mortgages also suggests a strengthening of the sales housing
market. As of September 2012, according to LPS Applied Analytics, 3.9 percent of mortgages in the region
were 90 or more days delinquent, were in foreclosure, or transitioned into REO (Real Estate Owned), down
from 4.3 percent a year earlier. The rate for the region was also well below the 7.5-percent national average.
Within the region, distressed mortgage rates ranged from 1.9 percent in North Dakota to 5.1 percent in Utah.
Home sales and prices were up in most metropolitan areas in the region. Based on data from CoreLogic, Inc.,
in the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, Fort Collins-Loveland, and Colorado Springs metropolitan areas in
Colorado, sales of existing homes were up 17, 13, and 3 percent, to approximately 44,700, 5,600, and 9,800
homes sold, respectively, during the 12 months ending August 2012. In the Grand Junction, Pueblo, and
Greeley areas, sales were up 13, 8, and 1 percent, to 2,600, 2,400, and 4,200 homes sold, respectively. In the
Salt Lake City and Provo-Orem metropolitan areas in Utah, existing home sales were up 13 and 6 percent, to
19,800 and 7,300 homes sold, respectively, but in the Ogden-Clearfield area, sales decreased 8 percent, to
7,200 homes sold. Sales were up substantially in some metropolitan areas in the northern part of the region.
During the 12 months ending August 2012, existing sales in the Fargo area were up 27 percent from a year
earlier, to 3,500 homes sold. In the Missoula and Billings areas in Montana, sales were up 17 and 4 percent,
to 1,450 and 2,400 homes sold, respectively. Existing sales totaled approximately 1,700 homes each in the
Casper and Cheyenne metropolitan areas in Wyoming, increases of 9 and 4 percent, respectively. Based on
the CoreLogic, Inc. Home Price Index, average sales prices for existing single-family homes in the Denver-
Aurora-Broomfield and Fort Collins-Loveland metropolitan areas in Colorado were up 3 and 2 percent,
respectively, compared with a year earlier, and prices in Greeley were up 5 percent from a year earlier.
Existing home prices increased approximately 1 percent in both Grand Junction and Colorado Springs. In the
Salt Lake City and Provo-Orem metropolitan areas in Utah, existing home prices rose 4 and 3 percent,
respectively, but in the Ogden-Clearfield area, prices remained unchanged. Prices in the Fargo area were up
slightly more than 1 percent. In Montana, prices in the Billings metropolitan area were up 3 percent, but
prices remained unchanged in Missoula. Existing home prices rose 7 percent in Casper but remained
unchanged in Cheyenne.
The strengthening home sales market in the Rocky Mountain region led to rising demand for new home
construction, although single-family homebuilding activity remains below historic averages. Based on
preliminary data, during the 12 months ending August 2012, single-family construction, as measured by the
number of homes permitted, was up 33 percent from a year earlier, to approximately 25,500 homes. By
comparison, from 2000 through 2007, single-family construction in the region averaged more than 66,000
homes a year. Single-family homebuilding increased in every state of the region. In Colorado, Utah, and North
Dakota, approximately 10,400, 7,850, and 2,700 homes were permitted in the 12 months ending August
2012, increases of 34, 32, and 62 percent, respectively. In South Dakota, Wyoming, and Montana,
approximately 1,875, 1,400, and 1,275 single-family homes were permitted, increases of 23, 13, and 25
percent, respectively. Stronger rental demand in the past year also led to increased multifamily construction.
During the 12 months ending August 2012, approximately 16,200 multifamily units were permitted in the
region, a 63-percent increase from a year earlier. Multifamily building activity in Colorado more than
doubled, to about 8,150 units permitted. More than three-quarters of those units were in the Denver-
Aurora-Broomfield metropolitan area. In Utah, multifamily building activity was up 18 percent, to 3,000 units
permitted. Nearly 1,100 multifamily units were permitted in the Salt Lake City area, and more than 600 units
were permitted in the Logan metropolitan area. In South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and North Dakota,
multifamily building activity increased 75, 57, 42, and 37 percent, to approximately 1,000, 600, 850, and
2,600 units permitted, respectively.
Rental housing markets in the Rocky Mountain region tightened during the 12 months ending September
2012, and conditions currently range from balanced to tight in most areas. Based on data from Apartment
Insights, rental markets were tight in most Colorado Front Range areas in the third quarter of 2012. In the
Denver-Aurora-Broomfield metropolitan area, the apartment vacancy rate averaged 4.8 percent in the third
quarter, down from 5.0 percent a year ago. The average apartment rent was up 7 percent during that period,
to approximately $960. In the Boulder metropolitan area, the vacancy rate remained steady at 3.8 percent,
and the average rent increased 7 percent, to $1,065. The Fort Collins-Loveland and the Greeley metropolitan
areas had apartment vacancy rates of 3.5 and 5.0 percent, down from 3.8 and 6.5 percent, respectively, a
year earlier and average apartment rents that increased 6 and 3 percent, to $975 and $700, respectively. In
the Colorado Springs area, conditions were balanced, with a 5.8-percent apartment vacancy rate, up from 5.2
percent a year ago, while the average rent increased 3 percent, to $755. More than 500 new units are in
lease-up in Colorado Springs, contributing to the rise in vacancies. Conditions in major metropolitan areas in
Utah are generally tight. Based on data from Reis, Inc., apartment markets in the Salt lake City and Ogden-
Clearfield areas were tight in the third quarter of 2012, with vacancy rates of 4.0 and 3.4 percent, down from
5.4 and 4.4 percent, respectively, a year ago. Apartment rents averaged about $795 and $710, increases of 3
and 2 percent, respectively, from a year earlier. The Provo-Orem apartment market remained somewhat
tight, with a 4.2-percent vacancy rate up from 3.6 percent a year ago, and rents averaged $785, a 1-percent
increase from a year earlier. Rental conditions were tight in some northern areas of the region. According to
Appraisal Services, Inc., the Fargo metropolitan area had a 2.5-percent apartment vacancy rate in September
2012, down from 5.7 percent a year ago. According to the Wyoming Community Development Authority, the
Casper and Cheyenne metropolitan areas had rental vacancy rates of 2.1 and 2.3 percent, respectively, in
June 2012 (the most recent data available), compared with 3.7 and 1.9 percent, respectively, a year earlier.
Updated
City Council Announcements
March 5, 2013
6:18:os PM Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Truth in Taxation Hearing Date Issue
In planning to reserve the date for a potential Truth in Taxation hearing for FY
2014, Council Staff realized that the Council does not have any regularly scheduled
meetings that fall before the state-mandated deadline of August 17th. The first week
in August (Aug 6th) is the night out against crime, and the second week (13th) is the
primary election night.
Staff confirmed with the attorney's office that it is legal for the Council to hold a
truth in taxation hearing in July, provided that the notice requirements are met (2
notices, with the last one being 7 days before the hearing). Staff has also inquired
with the County Auditor's office to see when their preliminary estimates of property
taxes are mailed out to property owners, so that the hearing can be scheduled after
this mailing has been received. Staff has not yet heard back from the County, but
will hopefully know by the Council's discussion on Tuesday.
Staff has identified the following 5 options for the Council to consider for a FY 2014
truth in taxation hearing date:
• July 23rd (meeting already on the Council schedule). The only issue with
this date might relate to when the County notices are received. There
might not be sufficient time elapsed from the send date of the County
notices.
• July 30th (Move the July 23rd meeting to July 30th to hold the truth in
taxation hearing on the 30th)
• August 6th - night out against crime - have a brief meeting only to have a
truth in taxation hearing. Note: this hearing does not have to be at 7Pm,
although holding the hearing after the standard workday of 5pm might
facilitate attendance.
• August 13th - primary election night - have a brief meeting only to have a
truth in taxation hearing. Same time issue applies as above.
• Other - the Council may wish to consider other days of the week for a
special meeting, although by law the City cannot schedule their truth in
taxation hearing on the same night and time as another taxing entity for
which a Salt Lake City taxpayer might be a part of (County, School District,
etc). Staff can inquire with the County as to available dates.
The Council consensus was to consider this item in conjunction with the already-
scheduled meeting on July 23, 2013.
B. City Council/School Board Leadership Meeting
The upcoming City Council/School Board leadership meeting is scheduled for
Friday, March 15 from noon to 1:30 pm. The School Board plans to host the
meeting. Council staff is inquiring with the School Board regarding their
agenda topics. Council staff will share those topics with the Council as
soon as they are received.
So far, the agenda for the meeting includes these topics:
• CDBG opportunities moving forward
• The School Board's role in the Capital City Education Proposal
• School Board response to recent news articles
>" Are there additional topics of interest that Council Members would like to
add to the agenda?
No response given at this time.
C. Utah Heritage Foundation Award
Salt Lake City has been selected for a 2013 Heritage Award in recognition for
outstanding preservation achievement.
An award ceremony will be held on Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. in The
Leonardo. According to protocol, the Mayor and Council Chair, to represent the
Council, will receive the award. The event will begin with a cash bar and a small
silent auction at 6:oo p.m. Dinner and the awards presentation will start at 7:00
p.m. Tickets are $85 each and a sponsored table of eight begins at $1,000.
, Do Council Members have names of associates, colleagues and friends they
would like to receive an invitation to purchase a ticket? Mailing addresses are
needed. This information is needed no later than March 15.
No response given at this time.
D. Hiberian Parade
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Council Office has submitted the Parade entry form to Parade Director
John Welsh, Council office still waiting for lineup information. Former
Councilman Van Tuner has graciously offered his Antique Fire truck for
Council Members to ride down the parade route.
, Councilmen LaMalfa, Christensen and Luke all have expressed interest. Are
any other Councilmember's interested in participating?
No response given at this time.
E. G. American Planning Association AP A-Utah Chapter Spring
Conference 2013
Wednesday, April 1~-19th early registration ends March 1"71h
Utah State University, Logan UT
>" Are any Councilmember's interested in attending?
Council member Simonsen indicated he will be attending; no additional response
given at this time.
F. Women's History Month - March
The country celebrates the accomplishments of women in American
history by celebrating Women's History Month every March.
'),- Is Council supportive of promoting and highlighting a few Salt Lake City
women who have made a difference in their community?
The Council consensus was in support.
G. Upcoming Anti-Bullying Events
./ March 15th Planned Parenthood event
Planned Parenthood Utah Teen Council members to do an Open Mike night
focused on Safe Space for Teens. Teens will host and sign up to share their
thoughts, songs, readings on this subject. The event is open to all youth and will
be promoted by youth themselves. Questions: email education@ppau.org
./ Week of March 18th Equality Utah events
Details not yet finalized .
./ March 2~ Wrap-up event
Details not yet finalized.
Information Only.
H. Completed Anti-Bullying Events
./ February 12th Kick-off press conference
./ February 19th YouthCity--"Lights On"
./ February 28th through Saturday, March 2nd "Excuse Me While I Change the
World" series of events from I Love Bullies:
o Everybody's Different Fashion Show, Thursday, February 28th
o Art Needs No Labels Art Show Friday, March 1st
o Will Sing For Good Concert. through Saturday, March 2nd
./ March 5th Playworks-"Community Recess" (11 a.m.)
o Join Playworks at Meadowlark Elementary for a Community Recess. Learn how
to make recess a safe, inclusive, and FUN part of every child's day. We'll start
with a brief workshop and then head out to the playground to participate in a
Playworks recess. Please RSVP to Allie Teller at: ateller@playworks.org
Information Only.
I. H.B. 36 Water Storage
H.B. 36, Stormwater Capture Amendments, is now pending in the
Senate. This bill would allow a person to capture up to 2,500 gallons
of precipitation for use on property ifit (i) is allowed by local law, (ii)
does not interfere with an existing water right; and (iii) is designed to
slow, detain or retain storm water or protect watersheds from
pollution. This would not be a water right and stored water could not
put to "beneficial use." Such water also could not be used for land
development. If the bill does not pass, the city could explore ways to
allow storage and use of precipitation in the same or similar ways,
including adoption of an ordinance.
Inquiry was raised as to if this is a House version or Senate version, with Council
member Simonsen stating there is a pending amendment in the Senate which the City
was involved in negotiating. He said that amendment is not friendly to the original
bill sponsor; he has alternate language that he feels effectively accomplishes
watershed protection rather than turning this water bill into a de-facto land use issue.
He said without support from the Council, he does not have the power to promote or
lobby a change.
Determination was made for Council member Simonsen to have authority to proceed
and pursue an amendment (which satisfies both Jeff Niermeyer and Mayor Becker) in
that Salt Lake City does not lose its ability to regulate its watershed and without the
land use regulations that have raised concerns and opposition for the original bill
sponsor.
City Council Announcements
March 19, 2013
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. City Asset Naming Request (Attachment) View Attachments
8:47:00 PM The Public Services Department has received requests, or has taken steps
to initiate the process of naming the following City assets.
• Tree Planting Recognition Marker. Last year the Rotary Club of Salt Lake
donated 100 trees to the City to commemorate its 100 Year Anniversary.
The trees were planted in Liberty Park, near the Rotary Play Park, and
several other community parks. The Club has asked the City for
permission to place a commemorative marker, consisting of a stone and
brass plaque, in Liberty Park to recognize the duration and the names of
citizens who donated and in whose names the trees were planted. The rock
and plaque would be placed in Liberty Park near the Rotary Play Park.
There will be no expense to the City.
o Would Council Members want to be involved in the naming process
and to what extent? By straw poll, the Council voted unanimously
to decline involvement in the process.
• Spring Mobile holds the naming rights to the City's baseball stadium
through March, 2014. It has decided not to exercise its option to renew its
right. The City is now free to offer a naming right to another buyer. The
Public Services Department has contracted with Miller Sports and
Entertainment (Bees Baseball Club) to market and negotiate a new
agreement. Miller is a proven expert in the field of sports marketing. The
Administration would like to start to process and release Miller to begin its
marketing campaign for the City. A new naming right agreement must be
in place by October 2013.
o Would Council Members want to have the final authorization on the
naming of the ball field or would Council Members want to be
involved in another way? By straw poll, the majority of the Council
declined involvement in the process.
• Public Safety Building Walkway Naming. The Administration has already
started a public campaign to name the walkway running through the new
Public Safety Building complex. This is a public competition and an
announcement of the name will be made as part of the Grand Opening
Celebration. A Public Relation firm is assisting the Mayor's office in this
activity. A walkway is defined as a major asset. The walkway is not a street,
but it is designed to accept an occasional vehicle for maintenance or
emergency purposes. Its character will be similar to the Library Square
walkway.
o Would the Council want to be involved in the process of naming the
Public Safety Building Walkway? By straw poll, the majority of the
Council voted to be involved in the naming process.
o Would the Council want to consent or decline to consent on a
recommendation or would Council want to be more involved in the
process? 8:51:15 PM Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director
clarified the question and asked 1) if one name was given to the
Council, would they want to agree or disagree, or 2) would the
Council want several names to be presented, and have Council
choose from the set of names. Ms. Gust-Jenson asked if they would
also want a public hearing. Discussion followed regarding various
options. Councilmember Simonsen suggested the Council receive
the recommended name, then vote to consent after the name was
presented at a public hearing. By straw poll, the majority of Council
Members was in favor.
};, By definition, the Spring Mobile Ball Park and the Public Safety Building
Walkway are major assets. The Tree Planting Recognition Marker is a minor
asset. Does the Council choose to opt-in to the naming request? See answers
above.
B. Philosophy Videos
8:58:02 PM Staff is working on 1-minute videos to explain the Council's philosophies
and respective priority projects. We're trying to get each 1-minute video done in
time for the Council's discussion of the project, and it will end up being about one
video per council meeting. (We missed the first 3, but will circle back to those later.)
The video will help explain the work session discussion, but won't be specific to
just the discussion - it will be a broader explanation of the topic and the Council's
focus.
We're going to link to the video on the Council's website, advertise it on social
media, link it to the Council agenda item, etc. in addition to posting them on
Channel 17.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said staff was working on one-minute videos to highlight the
Council's philosophy statements and would send the videos to Council Members for
review one or two days prior to putting them on Channel 17.
City Council Announcements
April 2, 2013
m 10-5
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Twitter Feed & Council Meetings
Based on a conversation with a member of the public, Council Chair LaMalfa would
like to renew the conversation about incorporating the Council's Twitter feed into
Council Meetings and Work Sessions. He has asked Council staff to explore with
IMS how to make this work, including readability, maximizing interaction,
preserving the public record, and other functionality points. Staff would coordinate
with RDA staff as well. This could potentially be expanded to incorporate Open City
Hall comments, etc., as has been raised by other Council Members.
, Is the Council supportive of staff pursuing this and doing a few trial runs
during upcoming Council Meetings when it is ready? After Council
discussion, the Council said they wanted to test the Twitter Feed in
August.
B. Grants for the Council's review
The Administration has forwarded information about the following grant
opportunities that they are pursuing. Following is a quick list of the items. A memo
with more information is attached. If the Council does not have any objections, and
the City is awarded the grant, these will come back through the Consent and Budget
Amendment process. The Council may wish to ask for more information related to
the Community Healthcare Program grant, because it includes funding for seven
new positions that may need to be kept and funded through the General Fund in
future years.
1) SLC Fire Department Community Healthcare Program
(Attachment)
a) Purpose / Goal of the Grant: fund the setup and first year of the
Community Healthcare Program in the Fire Department, including
staffing and needed materials & supplies.
b) Grant amount: $685,552 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,
Unsolicited Pioneer Portfolio
c) Requested by: Fire Department in collaboration with Gold Cross
Ambulance, Intermountain Healthcare, University of Utah Hospitals and
Clinics, 4th Street Clinic
d) Match Requirement: 100% required, met with planned purchases
e) Staff Positions: Seven new positions (5 community paramedics
and 2 nurse dispatcher positions) which would require
continued funding after the expiration of the grant
Ms. Gust-Jenson asked if council wanted a briefing? The Council said thev
would like a briefing.
2) 5th Annual Comm UNITY Fair (Attachment)
a) Purpose / Goal of the Grant: funding for supplies in support of the
Sorenson Unity Center 5th Annual Comm UNITY Fair, held May 29, 2013.
b) Grant amount: $600 for equipment and supplies from the Walmart Local
Giving Program (through Walmart Store #3589)
c) Requested by: Department of Community & Economic Development in
collaboration with several agencies involved in the event
d) Match Requirement: none.
C. Advance Ride on Airport Line
UTA would like to offer the Salt Lake City Council an opportunity to take
an advance ride. We are able to do this next Tuesday, April 9 and would
like to schedule a time for the City Council to take a ride.
It could take up to 90 minutes to ride the entire line, including getting
out and looking at a few stations. We can meet either at the North
Temple Bridge Station (FrontRunner part), or if people are driving we
will meet at the Fairpark Station (they can park at the Fairpark).
~ Is there a time when most/all of the council could ride?
The Council would like to join the .Joint Policv Advisoff Committee at 9:30 am .
Councilmember Christensen said the group was getting on at the ,Jordan River
stop.
D. Update - Sugar House Streetcar Public Hearing
1. Mailing & Notifications:
Attached is the suggested layout for the postcard and draft press
release. Staff needs the Council's approval on both items to
move forward.
o There are two map options - staff needs Council direction on
whether to include the possible route north along 1300 East,
and if so, whether the mailing list should be expanded to
include property owners there.
•
o By straw poll, the majoritv of the Council decided not to include the
1300 East line on the postcard and draft press release.
o Also, by straw poll, the majority of the Council decided to show the
routes on 1100 East north to 1700 South and 2100 South east to 1700
East on the postcard and draft press release.
• The postcard will be sent to property owners and tenants
along 2100 South up to 1700 East and along 1100 East
north to 1700 South, and a quarter-mile from each of
these routes.
• The postcard should be in the mail by early next week.
• Content from the postcard will also be used to create
posters and larger signs that will be placed in businesses
around Sugar House center, at local events over the
coming weeks, and other places as appropriate.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said Staff would like the Council's approval of text
on the postcard.
2. Hearing night:
The Chair has also asked staff to brainstorm ways to take
advantage of the potential crowd at the Council Meeting on
April 23 by setting up additional displays and stations in the
hallway to provide people with Streetcar information as well as
getting them engaged in other City Council news, transit
initiatives, etc.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said Staff will be asking for the Council's ideas and would
bring back proposals.
~ Does Council have any feedback or suggestions?
ADDITIONAL ITEMS:
1. Policy for handling sharply divided issues.
Ms. Gust-.Jenson said she was asked what the policy was for handling
issues when people ,.,·ere sharplv divided. She said if Staff was in a
difficult situation, the rule was at the discretion of the Councilmember, to
take the issue to the Chair and Vice-Chair or the full-body Council.
2. Expression of Appreciation for the Mayor's Bicycle Committee
Ms. Gust-Jenson said Staff needed clarification on Mayor's Bicycle
Committee's expression of appreciation:
She asked if Council wanted a separate resolution or as part of the
ordinance:
Sugar House
Streetcar
Tell the Salt Lake City Council where you'd like the
Sugar House Streetcar to take you
Public Hearing April 23, at 7:00 p.m,
Room 315 City & County Building
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah
(Refreshments will be served)
., ,.,. 0 1' • 1' ~ l
Web: www.slcgov.com/opencityhall
Attend: April 23rd Public Hearing
Email: council.comments@slcgov.com
Phone: 801-535-7654
Mail: Salt Lake City Council
P.O. Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476
Scan this QR code for
more information and
to share your input
Salt Lake City Council Office
P.O. Box 145476
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5476
PRST STD
U.S. POSTAG!i.:1•
PAID
POMA
84199
Resident
123 City Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
,
..
The Sugar House.Streetcar is cornir.j,
this year, where will it go next?
._ - - ..
:1111111Qm11111111111111
'
\
\
\
\
~
/-80
1- Recommended Route
l
. 1- Possible Future Expansions ·
270050UTH
The Salt Lake City Council will soon decide the
route for a proposed extension of the
Sugar House Streetcar
Tell the Council what YOU think
· ,,..fhe Sugar House, Streetcar is comiks
this year, where will it go next?
,_ ,_ 1--
V) "' "' ~ ~ s
0 0 0
a 2 a
"' ~ • • I I
,1111111011111111111111111
... --•
\
\
\
\ •
1-80
2700SOUTH
~ Recommended Route
~ Possible Future Expansions
The Salt Lake City Council will soon decide the
route for a proposed extension of the
Sugar House Streetcar
Tell the Council what YOU think
PRESS RELEASE
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April XX, 2013
Contact: XXXXXXXXXXX 1::
t~:~~,·;,:,I:.:.,;:·:,:·.... . s , .. ~;.\ ·{<i:f:;t\
Council launches, ublie~tl ch effort in
X•~ '\ \>
lead-up to Sugar·. :,iJ1\l~~ Str~i.~car public
hearing , ,,,.,:: {/:)t,.,,3:,, "~j 'c, "'~t;,;'.·.i . .::~.· .. :',,\:,:.:,·",·,·.,·,·.··,.:.· .. :.: .. :,:··, .. ,::h,·.'·,····:·,··~: ... ~f.il;s~i%,t,:,:.:., -: ,,'.·>
0)Pi?:p::::··•.,,~~1),·,, '{:ifo\ • · ·• . ·
The Salt Lake.Gey Cmili'cil·is taking·ttr ,, ts fo'!~~fJ~. crowd at its April 23, public
hearing about where.:tli~:P,ext phasl~~f the Sui\~ ... ,,, se Streetc~ should go.
More than 3,606(::'..: · ·: · · J postcards::·~·0 • en route to mailboxes along the potential
streetcar ro . ~ exten' . \ 'fse~ .what . ' . dents and business owners think about
'>'•'(< :,:<c•' '/ \\ ;-;:~
a r ommissi{lµ~d by,'l~ayor Ralph Becker's Administration.
the City· : " that·.. ·.i;i.tually b'8ffi{~ds of the streetcar will be connected to a
larger, ·de streetcai ,, . .,m, t:ltt·JJitY Coundl must first decide on one extension based on
available J:~d the time'i~,~~ssary ~~,!~ and build it.
The repij:~lecommend'. · tendintt:lie streetcar line north on Highland Drive and 1100
East to 1700 Sou('J3; he report ·, · contains several alternatives.
The public , ·ng is th xt step in extending the Sugar House Streetcar line that will
open in September oft~:. · 'at line that will link South Salt Lake and Sugar House and
currently ends at McCleIF · reet north of the Fairmont Park Aquatic Center.
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX@slcgov.com
• Who: Salt Lake City Council.
• What: Public hearing on Sugar House Streetcar route
recommendations
• When: April 23 at 7:00 p.m.
• Where: City Council Chamber in the City & County Building, 451
South State Street
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.SLCGOV.COM/COUNCIL IA',
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 '9;
-'
Other ways the public can comment:
Online forum: Open City Hall at http://www.slcgov.com/opencityhall
E-mail: council.comments@slcgov.com.
24-Hour Comment Line: 801-535-7654,
Mail: Office of the City Council, Room 304,
P.O. Box 145476, Salt Lake City, UT, 84114.
Hard copies of the streetcar report are available in the City Council Office and the Salt
Lake City Recorder's Office.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
WWW.SLCGOV.COM/COUNCIL f.A',
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651 '9,,
City Council Announcements
March 26, 2013
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. 6:17:35 Sidewalk Snow Removal - Enhanced City
Involvement
Council Member Luke Garrott and Council Member Charlie Luke have both raised
ideas for enhanced City involvement in sidewalk snow removal.
~ Does the Council wish to ask the Administration to provide alternatives in
the upcoming budget for funding that would further the City's goal of
having sidewalks cleared within 24 hours after each storm?
~ Does the Council wish to allocate staff resources to focus on a variety of
alternative approaches and report back to the Council following the budget
season, with the understanding that the Council may consider funding in a
budget opening?
This issue fits within the Council's Walkability emphasis
Administration did say they were going to be looking at this
further and coming back with some ideas.
Councilmember Luke discussed various circumstances that would
warrant enhanced snow removal. He suggested volunteer groups or
City staff that is already clearing sidewalks in some areas. He
said he is looking for something fairly limited but open for
individuals who do not have the ability or where it truly is
unreasonable to expect. He clarified it would not be a citywide
snow removal .
Councilmember Garrott said there are areas that simply do not
get shoveled. He suggested that the City send out a crew to
clean the sidewalk, or a process similar to cleaning up Code
Enforcement violations and then charging a property owner.
David Everitt said a request has been made for Orion Goff to put
together a work group and analysis of snow removal holes based
on last year's experience and come up with recommendations to
bring to the Council for options for additional enforcement
and/or effectiveness. He said Mr. Goff has begun that process
and would welcome Council Staff participation, direction, or
guidance. He said perhaps the group can return with a menu of
options and prioritized plowing of sidewalks and parks (similar
to streets) . He said staff would also look at the idea of one
side of the street being cleared of cars on heavy snow days and
how other cities do that. He said sidewalks at intersections
are also an issue.
Councilmember Penfold suggested a process for Council Staff to
identify some of the gaps. He said he is personally interested
in school districts, the connection between business licensing
and apartment owners, and other obvious problem areas.
There appeared to be consensus to add City Council Staff to
Administration's deliberations and participation on this work
group.
B. Administrative Response
Council Member Charlie Luke thanked David Everitt for the quick response to many
items by Administration and their Staff.
c. July Meeting Dates
Council Member Love raised the issue of July meeting dates, including the
necessary Truth in Taxation Meeting. She said she would prefer July 9 and 16
versus July 23.
Council Member LaMalfa will not be in town on July 9; Council
Member Christensen indicated July 23 is problematic for him.
No further response provided.
D. Alcohol Ordinance Modification
Council Member Charlie Luke said he would like to request Staff consider an
ordinance modification based on recently passed legislation where cities are now
able to set/regulate hours of operation for alcohol-specific establishments. He said
these types of establishments could potentially be surrounded by neighborhoods.
He asked for Council Staff to be able to return with options for hours of operation
for alcohol establishments; whether it be by conditional use, zoning, etc.
Councilmembers Carlton and Penfold indicated support.
Revised
City Council Announcements
April 9, 2013
(Updated information in bold)
Information Needed by Council Staff 8:53:23 PM
A. Locally Owned/Small Business
Council Member Love would like the Council to consider adopting a Legislative Action that
would require any project which uses City loans/money, to set aside a certain percentage of the
space for locally owned/ small businesses at reasonable rental rates. This policy would be
adopted by ordinance.
This would support locally owned/small businesses by helping them to secure properties that
would maintain lower lease rates. It could also be designed to assist locally owned/small
businesses buy their space.
Council Member Love would also like to ask the administration to research other incentives and
tools that would help local businesses to buy their building space, and what incentives are
available to developers that would encourage them to set aside a small part of their projects for
local/ small businesses.
This initiative relates to the Economic Health of the City and Neighborhood Quality of Life
priorities. Council Members Penfold and Simonsen said they would support the
legislative action so it could be forwarded to the Administration.
B. Budget Amendment #4 (Attachment)
Budget Amendment #4 includes (re-submitted) a request to fund the upgrade of
the five (5) electric charging stations to fast charge stations. The cost is estimated
at $26,000. The City is aware of a grant from Clean Cities that will allow for the
reimbursement of 50% of the cost or approximately $12,700. Catch is, the project
needs to be completed by the end of the month. We will need an appropriation to
make the upgrade. Facilities can float the cost now, if there is some expectation
that the amendment will be come through.
);.- Could the Council pre-authorize the amendment expenditure? A majority of
the Council was in favor. Councilmember Simonsen said approximately
three years ago the Council had a legislative intent related to setting up
charging stations by which this was created. He said one of the legislative
intent items was to update the Citywide parking ordinance to encourage or
even require the inclusion of parking stations in private lots similar to what
was done with handicapped and rideshare parking. He requested an update
from the Administration on the current status of that issue. Ms. Gust-
Jenson said she would follow-up.
C. July Council Meetings
Although the Council has discussed the schedule for July meetings already, there
is still some confusion on the best dates to meet, because of potential conflicts for
Council Members. It would help staff if the Council could take a straw poll on
availability for the following dates: A majority of the Council was in favor of July
9th and July 16th.
July9-Yes
July 16-Yes
July23-No
Crandall, Scott
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Crandall, Scott
Wednesday, April 10, 201311:05 AM
Sommerkorn, Wilford; Shaw, Eric
Tarbet, Nick; Jardine, Janice; Mansell, Cindi
Legislative Action Item
Hi Folks,
Please be aware as part of the April 9, 2013 Council Announcements, the Council was in support of initiating
the following Legislative Action Item relating to Locally Owned/Small Business. Please take appropriate action.
P.S. Please forward this e-mail to anyone else who needs to be involved.
Locally Owned/Small Business
Council Member Love would like the Council to consider adopting a Legislative Action that would require any
project which uses City loans/money, to set aside a certain percentage of the space for locally owned/small
businesses at reasonable rental rates. This policy would be adopted by ordinance.
This would support locally owned/small businesses by helping them to secure properties that would maintain
lower lease rates. It could also be designed to assist locally owned/small businesses buy their space.
Council Member Love would also like to ask the administration to research other incentives and tools that
would help local businesses to buy their building space, and what incentives are available to developers that
would encourage them to set aside a small part of their projects for local/ small businesses.
This initiative relates to the Economic Health of the City and Neighborhood Quality of Life priorities. Council
Members Penfold and Simonsen said they would support the legislative action so it could be
forwarded to the Administration.
1
A-II
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
David Everitt
Rick Graham
March 8, 2013
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations-Quick Charge Upgrade
It is time to revisit this issue. A door of opportunity (funding) has opened up to us.
Several months ago, Councilmember Love raised the issue of replacing the City's five (5) EV
"slow charge" units with "quick charge" units. She had hoped to attach funding to BA #3.
The timing of her request, and our suggestion that we further study the cost and public value of
the upgrade stopped all action to get funding.
Since then, we have learned the following:
1. Estimated cost to convert five (5) slow charge (8 hour) stations to quick charge (2)
hour) stations is $25,400.
2. Based on state DMV records, 117 electric powered vehicles are registered in Salt Lake
County. I don't know exactly how many are registered to City residents.
3. Between April and December 2012, there were 82 vehicle charges recorded on the
City's five stations; or about nine per month. Total City electricity cost was $5.02.
4. Utah Clean Cities has grant money available to the City to cover 50% of the upgrade
cost. With the grant, the City cost would be approximately $12,700 (Final cost of
upgrade won't be known until bids are issued and received). The grant funded work is
due immediately and must be completed and billed by April 30, 2013.
5. We are prepared to seek funding in BA#4, which has a submittal deadline today.
With the grant opportunity, and at the small cost to the City, I recommend that we push this
forward. We have not determined the public value, but I am predicting more public use once
the City re-markets the service and runs a public information campaign. At $12,700, I believe
the return of investment is there. It feels like the right thing to do. It is a nice statement for the
City to make.
To get this done, and to meet the grant deadline, we will include the expenditure in our BA#4
submittal. But, we will need to have the Council agree to the proposal up front and pre-
authorize the expenditure of funds. Though I haven't talked to Councilmember Love or Cindy,
I trust there is still strong interest in that office. Again, to get the grant, the City must commit
to spending the funds by April 30th. That is not much time to bid and receive the materials.
May we proceed? With your approval, I will contact Cindy to confirm the Council's
willingness to support.
Cc: Vicki Bennett
Jim Cleland
Alden Breinholt
City Council Announcements
May 7, 2013
Information Needed by Council Staff 9:03:04 PM
A. Proposed Ordinance Regulating Outdoor Fires in Residential
Areas
Council Member Simonsen would like to investigate time, place and manner
requirements for frequent or prolonged smoke from wood-burning fires in
residential areas. In some instances, outdoor fires are occurring with such regularity
and over extended periods of time, and are becoming a nuisance and potential
health risk to neighbors. The Salt Lake City Code and the International Fire Code
regulate "open burning" but do not require a permit for a "recreational fire." The
proposed ordinance may address when, where and how outdoor fires may occur in
residential areas to mitigate adverse impacts.
~ Does the Council support having the Council staff develop
such an ordinance? In order to move this proposalforward
under the Council's recently amended rules, at least three
Council Members must support it. Council Members
Garrott and LaMalfa said they supported the proposal.
Councilmember Simonsen said he saw to parts to this issue,
1) would be kind of a research component to see what
specific impacts there might be, health or air quality
related, and 2) trying to define whether or not there were
regulatory issues that we could consider. He said this could
be expanded to include broader air quality issues which
were not initially part of the consideration.
Additional Item:
Cindy. Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director, said Council
Members looked at potential scheduling dates for budget meetings. She
said there were two dates that had a majority of the Council available
which were Friday, May 31st and Friday, May 11Jlh. Councilmember
Simonsen said he would not be available for anything in May, but
potentially something in June. Ms. Gust-Jenson said additional meetings
were needed to try and adopt the budget on June 11th. She said staff would
getfeedback to the Chair/Vice Chair.
Announcement for Tuesday, June 8, 2013 {NOT HELD)
Iraqi Young Leaders with the Exchange Program (IYLEP)
Friday, July 12 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers
Council Member Simonsen plans to help coordinate and participate in a mock City Council
meeting with some youth from the Iraqi Young Leaders with the Exchange Program (IYLEP).
The group includes 9 Iraqi students, 2 local students, 1 Iraqi adult and 3 staff members from the
Utah Council for Citizen Diplomacy (UCCD). Following the mock meeting, the group plans a
lunch either on Washington Square or across the street at the library. Council Members are
invited to participate as their schedules allow.
Tuesday, July 16
This group oflraqi Young Leaders also plans to attend the Tuesday, July 16 City Council
meeting. They will be recognized by the Council at the meeting and be presented with
certificates. Council Chair and Vice Chair have invited the group to have dinner with Council
Members. Logistics for the dinner will be provided to the Council once details are confirmed by
staff.
City Council Announcements
July 9, 2013 fJ{)f-tldc{
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Citywide Concrete Study Scope (See Attached)
In the initial discussion the Council requested that the issue of identifying areas
where sidewalk does not exist and options to addressing those needs be included in
this study.
The Administration has received a bid proposal from NV5 regarding the Citywide
Concrete Replacement Study. The Administration would like to proceed as soon as
possible, and would like the Council's okay before issuing a Notice to Proceed.
The proposed bid for the project is $39,450. It includes: review of the existing City
concrete program; identify and study other similar Municipal programs; identify
and evaluate other funding sources, strategies, and best practices; and present
findings to the City Council. The Administration noted that, if needed, some
changes to the scope could be possible given the proposed bid.
• Does the Council have additional requests or suggestions?
NVS
BEYOND ENGINEERING
May 23, 2013
Salt Lake City Corporation
Attn: JOHN J. NASER, P.E.
349 South 200 East, Suite 600
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Re: City Wide Public Way Concrete Study
Dear Mr. Naser,
NV5 appreciates the opportunity to present our proposal to help the City find solutions to address
the city's concrete infrastructure maintenance, repair and replacement needs, including funding
strategies.
NV5 has prepared pavement and asset management plans for a number of municipalities and
other entities including the City of Santa Clara, CA; Pittsburg, CA; Martinez, CA; Lorma Linda,
CA; Novato, CA; Madera County, CA; Midvale City, UT; the City of South Salt Lake, UT;
Davis County School District, UT and Tooele School District, UT. We also have a major role in
the concrete replacement program for the City of Colorado Springs, CO. NV5 staff has been
under contract for over seven years assuming full management of all asphalt and concrete for the
City (see attached). From this and other experience, we understand that investing in ongoing
maintenance can help defer the cost of reconstruction, and provide reasonable and safe passage
for its citizens.
Concrete infrastructure encompasses a substantial investment by the City. The proper
maintenance of this asset will provide dividends in numerous areas, including pedestrian safety,
conformance with ADA requirements and functional infrastructure (control of storm water and
pavement preservation) based on reasonable maintenance and replacement programs.
Using a benchmarking process, NV5 will review the current system of repair/replace/funding
utilized by Salt Lake City. We will compare Salt Lake City's system with a broad range of other
city's approaches to concrete repair and funding strategies. We will utilize our network of
relationships with other municipalities to access and review what cities of similar size and make
up are doing successfully and have tried (but perhaps not continued with) in order to provide a
comprehensive evaluation of strategies and funding options for use by the City. NV5 proposes
the following scope and fee:
Task 1 - Review the existing City concrete program
It is important at the onset of any project to understand the work that has already been
accomplished. NV5 realizes that City staff has already assembled data and created documents
relevant to this scope of work. NV5 will work closely with City staff (Engineering and Public
:, r ;, i
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET, STE 300 MURR.<Y. UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM : O<F'1CE EOI. 743. 1300 FM 801 743 0300
'l 11-11 ~ »
NV 5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Services) to assemble and peer review the previously compiled information in order to identify
any gaps or additional data that may be required.
NV 5 will review the current system including the installation of needed concrete infrastructure in
areas where none exists, review existing inventory and maintenance strategies for existing
concrete infrastructure, and the upgrade of infrastructure to comply with changing legislation
(ADA requirements). The infrastructure included for this scope of work consists primarily of
public sidewalk, curb and gutter, stairs, walls, ADA ramps, and driveway approaches.
NV5 will also review the City ordinance (Title 14) and policies for the current public way
concrete program. NV5 will summarize the current program administration and construction
practices. NV5 will work closely with staff to summarize current political, legal and financial
considerations that are driving the current City practices and funding options.
This task assumes two meetings with staff to understand the current inventory, maintenance
program and funding sources.
Task 1- $5,700.00
Task 2 - Identify other similar Municipal Programs
Task 2a - NV5 will conduct a very broad evaluation of other cities regarding their approach to
addressing public way concrete repair and funding strategies. We will identify multiple cities from
across the country to create a pool of 25 representative cities for an initial screening phone
interview to ensure we capture a wide spectrum of strategies for the maintenance/replacement
and funding for concrete in the public way. NV5 will conduct one two hour meeting with staff to
review the findings of the initial screening. During this meeting, NV5 and City staff will select
ten cities for more detailed comparison.
Task 2a - $3,750.00
Task 2b - We will review the ordinances and policies and conduct a second more in depth phone
interview with staff from the ten selected cities to understand how their current system for
maintaining concrete infrastructure functions including: inventory, maintenance of concrete,
administration and construction practices, codes, advantages or gaps in their current system, how
they communicate with citizens, and funding strategies to pay for maintenance and replacement
of this infrastructure. Many municipalities simply maintain concrete as part of their roadway
infrastructure and pay for it with similar funds. However this infrastructure is closely related to
the drainage system and this raises the possibility of other funding vehicles.
Task 2b - $10,000.00
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3'.)() MuRRJ.Y, UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM OFFICC eOI 743 1300 >AX 801 743 0300
t ~• 1 1..-, 1 r , , ~~ , r • ~\ '
NVS
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Task 3 - Identify and Evaluate Funding Sources and Strategies
NV5 will summarize the funding sources currently used by the City including Community
Development Block Grants, General Funds, Class C funds, the State's Safe Sidewalk Program,
Private improvements and Property owner shared improvements (City 50/50 program). NV5
with staff will identify potential alternative funding sources based on the funding strategies used
by other municipalities identified in Task 2 specifically for the repair and replacement ( outside of
CIP funds) of concrete assets and make specific recommendations about any other funding
sources or strategies that might be viable for the City. We will provide summary data on all
funding strategies and partnering opportunities found being utilized by the ten cities from Task 2.
Since concrete curb and gutter provide roadway benefits including controlling storm water and
pavement preservation, funding sources associated with these benefits will be identified where
they exist. This task includes two meetings with staff to discuss funding sources and strategies.
Task 3 - $5,100.00
Task 4 - Best Practices and Stakeholder Input/Recommendations
NV5 will identify and evaluate any new or alternative products, materials, or evaluation
techniques and construction practices based on the information gathered in Task 2 and from
readily available market data.
NV5 will solicit comments and concerns from City Departments and stake holders and identify
options for addressing each. This will include one meeting with City staff and one public
meeting to gather community concerns.
NV 5 will prepare a report to document the findings of the previous tasks for use by staff, the
administration and City Council. We will summarize the data into easily understandable tables
to facilitate comparison of the City's current practices including ordinances, policies,
administrative approach, inventory, maintenance, repair, replacement, and construction practices
and funding with those of the ten interviewed cities. We will also identify, evaluate, and make
recommendations for potential funding sources and strategies. The recommendations will
include a cost comparison between the City's program (including the 50/50 program) and the
other municipalities. The report will identify staff and stake holder concerns and options for
addressing those concerns including recommendations for ordinance or policy changes if
warranted. The report will identify and evaluate any alternative products or new techniques and
include recommendations and alternatives to improve the City's current public way concrete
program.
Task 4 - $13,300.00
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3'.)() MURR,<Y, UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM OFFICE eOI 743 1300 Ft,X 801 743 0300
N 11..' T ''J . ' A,
,\ J ,---.: .r vr »:
NV S
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Task 5 - Present findings to City Council
NV5 will summarize and present the findings of this effort to the City Council. We anticipate
this effort to include creating presentation graphics and tables, summarizing the effort in a short
report, and presenting this summary to the council.
Task 5 - $1,600.00
Schedule: NV5 anticipates that the entire process can be completed in approximately three
months which will allow a reasonable time to review the existing City program, gather data and
interview other municipalities and to solicit staff and stakeholder input.
Task 1 - Review the existing City concrete program
Task 2 - Identify other similar Municipal Programs
Task 2a
Task 2b
Task 3 - Identify and Evaluate Funding Sources and Strategies
Task 4 - Best Practices and Stakeholder Input/Recommendations
Task 5 - Present findings to City Council
$5,700.00
$3,750.00
$10,000.00
$5,100.00
$13,300.00
$1,600.00
Total $39,450.00
The NV5 Team is committed to finding the most appropriate design solutions for this project and
we are eager to exceed your expectations of what a civil engineering company can do.
Sincerely,
NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC.
(a subsidiary of Nolte Vertical Five)
/
Curt McCuistion, PE, LEED-AP, CMQ/OE
Office Director/ Associate
Authorized Signature Date
, ~ r L
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3:)() MURRAY. UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM o~FICE EOI 743 1300 F'A X 801 743 0300
NV 5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
City of Colorado Springs
NV5 is managing the resurfacing program, the concrete replacement program associated with the street
overlay work, and the alley program. The resurfacing program is estimated at $6.4 million annually, the
concrete program is approximately $5.5 million (including 42 miles of sidewalks, 80 miles of curbs and
gutters, 695 crosspans and, 3,059 pedestrian ramps), and the alley program is approximately $750
thousand over the next five years for an annual budget of about $12.65 million annually.
The resurfacing projects include up to 80 miles of roadway maintenance in the form of slurry seal, chip
seal, and overlay improvements. The concrete program involves replacement of curb/gutter/sidewalk and
crosspans for the overlay programs of the Street Division and the PPRTA. The Alley program improves
approximately 35 of the over 1253 alleys in Colorado Springs.
NV5 developed the project delivery management system to help monitor the work, develop the
specifications for the work, provide necessary documentation of work being performed, and financial
information. Other services included:
• Preparation of Request for Funds support documents for presentation to the PPRTA Board for
project funding.
• Reviewing Pavement Management Analysis results for the PPRTA and Street Division Program
• Creating contract documents for resurfacing work, the concrete program, and the alley program
for the PPRT A and the outside contractor portion of the Street Division annual program.
Managing the projects from bidding thru completion of the work.
• Coordination of the contract work with City Agencies and other agencies impacted by the work.
Inspecting projects thru completion including traffic control and material testing.
• Providing Public Relations required during the program including advising the emergency
services providers of the work, the Transit personnel of areas affecting their bus routes, the
neighborhoods affected by the work and handle any phone calls from interested parties.
• Preparing weekly reports to the Street Division and monthly reports to the PPRT A Board
including the project financials.
We assisted them in the creation of their concrete repair/replacement program including the criteria
describing the level or priority of need based on specific examples available to the public via the city
website. Examples are:
Priority 1 Priority 3
'l , 1 1 , 'i ..
MURRAY, UT 84107
f ,,
WWW NV5 COM I Of'FICC eOI 743 1300 FA< 80\ 743 0300 5217 SOUTH STATE 5TREET, STE 3:)()
/\ d ,< ... ; I', ,\ 1 f.. l
M 13-~
City Council Announcements
July 16, 2013
(Not held)
Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Quarterly Housing Report
Attached is the Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2012-13 for the third
quarter.
• Is the Council interested in a briefing on the report?
B. Possible Work Session Meeting on Thursday, Aug 15
• Does the Council want to stay after the 6 p.m. meeting to address other
agenda items?
City Council Announcements
August 15, 2013
7:59:41 PM Information Needed by Council Staff
A. Central Community Master Plan and Zoning Map
Applicant is requesting an extension to fulfill the condition of Ordinance 60 or 2012, Central Community
Master Plan and zoning map pertaining to the properties located between 1015 and 1035 South 200
West and at 1068 South Jefferson Street. The applicant is continuing to work towards developing the
property and has requested additional time to complete the project.
A public hearing is not necessary to extend the timeframe for the ordinance. If the Council approves,
the extension would be scheduled for August zo" for potential action.
An ordinance amending the Central Community Master Plan and zoning map pertaining to the
properties located between 1015 and 1035 South 200 West and at 1068 South Jefferson Street.
The ordinance has a condition that the applicant and the City enter into a development
agreement that:
• Limits building heights on the properties to seventy-five feet
• Requires compatibility for pedestrian and bicycle access
• Requires buildings to be oriented in a manner that is compatible with the neighborhood
• Runs with the land
If the conditions set forth in the ordinance are not satisfied within one year from adoption of the
ordinance, it shall become null and void. The deadline to extend the ordinance is August 21,
2013.
~ Is the Council interested in a briefing on the report?
The Council consensus was for no briefing and to move forward with action.
B. Quarterly Housing Report
Attached is the Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2012-13 for the third
quarter.
~ Is the Council interested in a briefing on the report?
The Council consensus was to accept the written report and not require a briefing.
C. FY 2013 Justice Assistance Grant Application Submission
Notification
Attached is the full application submitted to the Department of Justice Bureau of
Justice Assistance. It is the requirement of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2013 Local Solicitation, that the Council please
review the attached grant application submission notification.
'r Does the Council have any questions? There were no questions.
D. Possible Donation to 2013 National Association of Civilian
Oversight and Law Enforcement Conference (See attachment)
Council Member Christensen would like to discuss whether it would be relevant for
the City to consider making a contribution to the NACOLE conference in Salt Lake City
September 22-26th.
• NACOLE, a 501(c)(3), attracts 250-300 attendees from a community of oversight
practitioners from across the United States and over 10 different nations
• A contribution of $5,000 would allow up to 10 guests, which would provide an
opportunity to invite non-traditional community members to attend conference
workshops.
• Rick Rasmussen, Administrator for the Salt Lake City Police Civilian Review board,
encourages the council to contribute to the Keynote Speaker lunch or the guest
reception.
• Following the recent controversy over the West Valley City Police department, the
conference is expected to generate meaningful discussion of oversight practices, and
create a dialogue between oversight practitioners and law enforcement.
»- Is the Council supportive of making a contribution to the 2013 NACOLE
conference hosted in Salt Lake City?
There appeared to be Council consensus towards making a contribution jrom the
General Fund; it was requested Stafjjollow proper procedures for completion.
E. Citywide Concrete Study Scope (See Attachment)
In the initial discussion the Council requested that the issue of identifying areas
where sidewalk does not exist and options to addressing those needs be included in
this study.
The Administration has received a bid proposal from NV5 regarding the Citywide
Concrete Replacement Study. The Administration would like to proceed as soon as
possible, and would like the Council's okay before issuing a Notice to Proceed.
The proposed bid for the project is $39,450. It includes: review of the existing City
concrete program; identify and study other similar Municipal programs; identify
and evaluate other funding sources, strategies, and best practices; and present
findings to the City Council. The Administration noted that, if needed, some
changes to the scope could be possible given the proposed bid.
»- Does the Council have additional requests or suggestions?
Ms. Gust-Jenson said she would ensure the bid proposal/scope of work includes
comments/items (i.e. gutters) previously suggested by the City Council. The Council
acknowledged they would direct any additional requests or suggestions to Staff via e-
mail and requested Staff provide them with the Citywide Concrete Replacement Study
and attachment information.
ERIC D. SHAW
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
MARY DE LA MARE•SCHAEFER
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
m~®~DW~~
WJ JUN 2 7 2013 ~
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
Date Received:
Date sent to Council: .......... _.,. ........ .!IL.I',._~,
TO: Salt Lake City Council
Kyle LaMalfa, Chair
DATE: June 3, 2013
FROM:
SUBJECT:
STAFF CONTACT:
Eric D. Shaw, CED Director_~"'-------"---'----'------
3rd Quarterly Housing Report for Fiscal Year 2012/2013
Michael Akerlow, Director of HAND
(801) 535- 7966, michael.akerlow@slcgov.com
Nichol Bourdeaux, Deputy Director of HAND
(801) 535-6264, nichol.bourdeaux@slcgov.com
COUNCIL SPONSOR: None
DOCUMENT TYPE: Briefing
RECOMMENDATION: None
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The 3rd quarter housing report for FY 2013 is presented to the Council in a new format.
The new quarterly housing report is presented in a reader-friendly summary report
containing charts, figures and graphs. The summary has comparable figures with
quantifiable data, backup showing outputs and the overall impact of the housing program.
The goal of the new format is to present a clear picture of Salt Lake City housing in its
present state, with a comparison of the previous year.
Analysis: The following information is included in the report:
• Quarterly Housing Report
• Attachments A - I
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404
P.O. BOX 145466, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 64114•5466
TELEPHONE: 801·535•6230 F"AX: 601·535•6005
WWW,SLC::GOV.COM/Cf!l)
PUBLIC PROCESS: None
ATTACHMENT:
• A - Loans to First-Time Homebuyers, Rehabilitation Projects, Funding Sources and
Outreach/Marketing Efforts
• B - Housing Starts, Additions, Remodels and Repairs
• C - Boarded Building Activity and Closed/Boarded Houses/ Apartments by Council
District
• D - Housing Trust Fund Ledger
• E - Subdivision Housing Report
• F - Community Development Corporation CDBG and HOME Reports
• G- NeighborWorks Salt Lake CDBG and HOME Reports
• H - CDBG and HOME Reports
• I - Economic Update
Housing and Neighborhood
Development
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
3RD QUARTER 2012-2013
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
First-Time Home Buyers and Rehabilitation Projects
Loans Closed Dollar Amount
40 $700,000
35 $600,000
30 $500,000 --
25
$400,000
20
$300,000 15
$200,000 --~~----- 10
$100,000 5
0 $0
FTHL SFRP MFRP FTHL SFRP MFRP
Iii Fiscal YTD 2012-2013 Iii 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 03rd Quarter 2011-2012
Project Type Loans Closed Dollar Amount Loans Closed Dollar Amount Loans Closed Dollar Amount
First Time Hornebuyer Loans (FTHL) 6 $ 736,595.00 0 $ 0.00 4 $ 475,800.00
Single Family Rehabilitation Projects (SFRP) 60 $ 559,572.98 18 $ 192,303.41 13 $ 153,418.00
Multi-Family Rehabilitation Projects (MFRP) 5 $ 84,025.00 0 $ 0.00 1 $ 19,400.00
Total 71 $ 1,380,192.98 18 $ 192,303.41 18 $ 648,618.00
Fiscal YTD 2012-2013 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 3rd Quarter 2011-2012
FIRST TIME HOME BUYERS, REHABILITATION PROJECTS, FUNDING SOURCES, AND OUTREACH EFFORTS
The City's Housing Program funding sources for this fiscal year are the Community Development Block
Grant Program (CDBG}, the HOME Program and Program Income from CDBG, HOME, Renter Rehab, Housing
Trust Fund and Utah State Funding. Private Funding Sources are with GE Capital, Ally and American Express.
The First Time Homebuyer Program, which uses HOME, CDBG, and private funding sources has placed 385
families in properties this year. As of the end of the third quarter, four homes are available for sale and
applications are beginning to increase, and no houses were sold this quarter. Two properties are under
contract and are waiting for the applicant to close. The Housing Rehabilitation Program has completed 65
projects with 80 units this fiscal year. For the second quarter, the rehabilitation staff closed 18 projects with 18
units. For the third quarter, 39 rehab applications were received of which four were declined upon initial
review. The number of applications that passed the initial review was 12.9% higher than the third quarter of
last year. Of those declined, most are rejected due to poor credit, high outstanding mortgage balances or high
income. Several of those showing as passing the initial review were placed on hold pending receipt of further
information. Fourteen first time home buyer applications were received of which two were declined during the
pre-screening process.
See Attachment A 1
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
The number of First Time Home Buyer applications that passed the initial review was 300% higher than the
third quarter of last year. During the third quarter, 10 projects were bid, one more over the same time
period last year. Home prices are rising and we are still seeing multiple offers on homes being made. The
number of First Time Home Buyer applications is increasing, however, finding product has been difficult due
to competition from private rehab projects. In addition, interest rates are at an all time low giving borrowers
more financing options. Housing and Neighborhood development is looking at additional products to ensure
an affordable way of financing a home.
Funding Sources
Fiscal YTD 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 3rd Quarter 2011-2012
• Personal Contributions Iii Community Development Block Grant
Iii Private Funding Sources
Iii Other Funds*
Iii HOME
*Other Funds includes Rental Rehab and River Park Funds
See Attachment A 2
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Housing Starts, Additions, Remodels, and Repairs
Additions, Remodels & Repairs New Housing Units
Number of Units
Permits Issued
0 200 400 600 800
Iii 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 Iii Fiscal YTD 2012-2013
0 so 100 150 200 250 300
03rd Quarter 2011-2012
Fiscal YTD 2012-2013 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 3rd Quarter 2011-2012
Additions, remodels,
New Housing Units Additions, remodels, New Housing Additions, remodels, New Housing
and Repairs and Repairs Units and Repairs Units
Number of Units
614 300 208 25 200 32
Permits Issued
830 143 232 9 229 17
HOUSING STARTS. ADDITIONS. REMODELS. AND REPAIRS
During the 3rd quarter of fiscal year 2012-2013 there were 9 permits issued for 25 new
housing units. The number of housing units is greater than the number of permits issued in some cases due to
one permit being issued for several new housing units (see attachment B for more details). There were 232
permits issued for 208 housing units for housing additions, remodels, and repairs. The number of permits, in
this case, is lower than units due to permits being issued for things like bathrooms, kitchens, etc. Compared
to last year's data for the same time period, there was a 47% decrease in the number of permits issued for
new housing permits and a 21.9% decrease in new housing units and a slight increase of 4% in permits issued
and a 1.3% increase in the number of housing units for additions, remodels, and repairs.
See Attachment B 3
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Boarded & Vacant/Secured Buildings
3rd Quarter
2012-2013
Boarded Buildings Vacant/ Secured Buildings I ' I
3rd Quarter
2011-2012
0 10 20 30 40 so 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
11 District #1 11 District #2 cJ District #3 iii District #4 • District #5 iii District #6 iii District #7
-
Boarded Buildings
District #1 District #2 District #3 District #4 District #5 District #6 District #7 TOTAL
3rd Quarter 2012 5 10 2 19 7 1 3 47
3rd Quarter 2013 5 11 2 21 7 1 3 so
Vacant/Secured Buildings
District #1 District #2 District #3 District #4 District #5 District #6 District #7 TOTAL
3rd Quarter 2012 10 26 17 21 24 2 6 106
3rd Quarter 2013 13 41 14 21 25 2 4 120
BOARDED AND VACANT/SECURED BUILDINGS
During the 3rd quarter of fiscal year 2012-2013 there were a total of 50 boarded buildings and 120
vacant/ secured buildings or an increase of 6.38% and 13.21% respectively in comparison to the 3rd quarter
of the previous year. Districts 2 and 4 showed increases in boarded buildings of 10% and 10.53% when
compared to the previous year while all other districts showed no changes. Districts 3 and 7 showed
decreases in the number of vacant/ secured buildings when compared to the previous year of 17.65% and
33.21% respectively. Districts 5, 1, and 2 all showed increases in the number of vacant/ secured buildings of
4.17%, 30%, and 57.69% respectively. District 6 had no change in comparison to the previous year.
See Attachment C 4
I ):'VfLOPiv'.E',T
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Housing Trust Fund
3rd Quarter 2012-2013
Dollar Amount Total Units Affordable Project Status
Units
1 LibertyVillageinSugarHouse $ 750,000.00 Completed 171 35
2 Wendell Apartments $ 404,998.00 Pending 32 32
3 Ci ti front Apartments s 265,000.00 Pending 6 6
4 Brunswick Apartments $ 500,000.00 Pending 132 127
HOUSING TRUST FUND
There was one project completed during the 3rd quarter of 2012-2013 for a total dollar amount of
$750,000 in borrowed funds, 171 total units, and 35 affordable housing units. Liberty Village Properties, LLC
was approved for a loan through the Housing Trust Fund for the development of Liberty Village in Sugar
House Apartment Building located at 2150 South McClelland St. in the Sugar House neighborhood of Salt Lake
City. Other projects that have been approved but are still pending include the Wendell Apartments, Citifront
Apartments, and Brunswick Apartments housing development projects. The total amount of units, including
the pending projects, is 341 units with 200 affordable housing units.
See Attachment D 5
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Subdivision Housing Report
Projects Approved
Total# of Lots/ Units
iiiiilii I I
i
I
I
I
liil 2nd Quarter 2011-2012
liil 3rdQuarter 2012-2013
D Fiscal YTD 2012-2013
Total Preliminary Plats
0 5 10 15
3rdQuarter
'
2012-2013
Total Preliminary Plats 13 2 1
Total# of Lots/ Units 23 6 5
SUBDIVISION HOUSING REPORT
During the 3rd quarter of fiscal year 2012-2013 there were two new preliminary plats approved with
6 lots/ units to make a yearly total of 13 preliminary plats approved with a total of 23 lots/ units. The projects
approved during the 3rd quarter of 2012-2013 included the Lotus Blue Koi Minor Subdivision at 1706 South
900 East and the Watcke Subdivision at 1514 West Indiana Avenue. Compared to the previous year the
number of preliminary plats doubled and the number of lots/ units increased by 20 percent.
See Attachment E 6
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
HOME and CDBG
Units Funded
Salt Lake City CDBG
Neighbor Works CDBG
Neighbor Works Home
CDC CDBG
CDC Home
' ' ' j
! I I
l
I
I !
-l
! I I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Number of Units Funded
Organization 3rd Quarter 2012-2013 ~
Salt Lake City CDBG 18
Neighbor Works CDBG 5
Neighbor Works HOME 2
CDC CDBG 8
CDC HOME 7
Dollar Amount Funded
$0.00 $75,000.00 $150,000.00 $225,000.00
Iii Sa It Lake City • NeighborWorks w Community Development Corporation
HOME AND CDBG
For the 3rd quarter of the fiscal year 2012-2013 the Salt Lake City CDBG funded 18 units with a total
dollar amount of $121,040.56, Neighbor Works funded 5 units with CDGB funds and 2 units with HOME funds
for a total dollar amount of $59,453. The Community Development Corporation funded 8 units with CDBG
funds and 7 units with HOME funds with a total dollar amount of $51,505.
See Attachment F,G, and H 7
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Economic Update
The economy of the Rocky Mountain region continued to strengthen in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Seasonally adjusted nonfarm payrolls increased by 39,000 jobs, or 0.8 percent, from the previous quarter, to
about 5.12 million jobs. Payrolls were up by 115,000 jobs, or 2.3 percent, from a year ago. For the past 2
years North Dakota has had the fastest rate of job growth in the region (and the U.S.); nonfarm payrolls
increased by 18,000 jobs, or 4.5 percent, from a year ago. In Colorado, Utah, Montana and South Dakota,
payrolls increased by 49,000, 35,000, 10,000 and 3,000 jobs, or 2.2, 2.9, 2.4 and 0.7 percent, respectively. In
Wyoming, nonfarm payrolls were essentially unchanged from a year ago. The unemployment rate for the
region averaged 6.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, down from 6.7 percent a year earlier and during
the previous quarter. Unemployment rates within the region ranged from 3.1 percent in North Dakota to 7.7
percent in Colorado. The U.S. rate was 7.8 percent in fourth quarter 2012, down from 8.7 percent a year ago.
U.S. nonfarm payrolls in the fourth quarter were up by 2.17 million jobs from a year earlier, and payrolls were
up by 537,000 jobs from the previous quarter. Sectors with large gains in the fourth quarter included
professional and business services, education and health services, and leisure and hospitality. Combined,
those sectors added about 295,300 jobs. (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "ROCKY
MOUNTAIN ECONOMY: UPDATE." February 2013.)
Utah Nonfarm Employment
(thousands)
1,220
LJ Last Year ii Last Quarter a Current Quarter22
Percentage Change in Employment
Compared to Last Year and Last Quarter
4.0% "T--------------------
Utah Region United States
Iii Last Year a Last Quarter
See Attachment I 8
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
In addition, the construction and retail trade subsectors added 45,000 and 123,400 jobs,
respectively. This growth was partly offset by a loss of 40,300 jobs in the government sector, including 25,700
local government jobs, and a slight decrease in manufacturing payrolls. U.S. Real Gross Domestic Product
(GDP) decreased slightly in the fourth quarter of 2012. BEA emphasized that this advance estimate is subject
to revision. The decline was largely attributable to decreases in private inventory investment, exports, and
federal government spending. Those were partially offset by increases in personal consumption
expenditures, residential and nonresidential fixed investment, and a decline in imports (imports are
subtracted in the GDP calculation). The Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) for the
U.S. rose 0.5 percent in December, to 93.9. The LEI was unchanged in November, but increased 0.3 percent in
October. The University of Michigan Index of Consumer Sentiment stood at 72.9 in December, down from
82.7 in November, but up from 69.9 a year earlier. Despite the unexpected decrease in GDP, the continued
strength in consumer spending and business investment, as well as improvements in the housing sector,
suggest the economy should grow at a moderate pace during 2013. (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development. "ROCKYMOUNTAIN ECONOMY: UPDATE." February 2013.)
Average Home Prices 2012 Unemployment Rate 2012
1 2 3
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0 -· 5.5
5.0
4 1 2
~Utah
$275,000.00 +------:--=:----------
$260,000.00
$245,000.00 +---1------------
$230,000.00 +-----:;,,~~~r;;;;;;;;;;;i.iiiiiiiii-::Jl--
$215,000.00 +--...JC..----------
$200,000.00 +------.------.----,.-----,
~USA ~SLC
3
Region ~USA
4
See Attachment I 9
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
Housing construction increased in the fourth quarter. The annualized rate of new-home starts for the
U.S. in December was up 12 percent from November, to 954,000 units, and up 37 percent from the rate of
697,000 units a year ago. Based on permits issued, homebuilding within the region was up strongly in fourth
quarter 2012, compared with a year ago. Although permits were down 24 percent in Wyoming, increases in
the other states in the region ranged from 17 percent in Montana to 120 percent in South Dakota. In Utah
and Colorado, the number of homes permitted increased 24 and 90 percent, to 3,100 and 6,000 homes,
respectively. Apartment vacancy rates in fourth quarter 2012 were down from a year ago in the Denver-
Aurora-Broomfield and Colorado Springs metro areas in Colorado, and in Utah's Wasatch Front metro areas
(including Salt Lake City). In Salt Lake City, vacancy rates were down to 3.8 percent compared to 4.3 percent
last year. The U.S. rental vacancy rate was essentially unchanged from a year ago. Sales of existing single-
family homes were up 21 and 7 percent in the Denver-Aurora and Salt Lake City metro areas, respectively.
Prices for existing single-family homes were also up strongly, 12 and 13 percent, respectively. For the U.S.,
existing home sales in December were up 11 percent from a year ago, and prices were up 10 percent.
Distressed mortgages (defined as home loans 90 or more days delinquent, in foreclosure, or in REO were
down from a year ago in both the region and the U.S., to 3.6 and 7.1 percent of mortgages, respectively. (U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development. "ROCKY MOUNTAIN ECONOMY: UPDATE." February 2013.)
Residential Building Permits Issued Utah Apartment Vacancy Rates
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Mar Jun Sept Dec
Iii Utah iii Region ,.J Last Year Iii Last Quarter Iii Current Quarter
See Attachment I 10
QUARTERLY HOUSING REPORT
THIRD QUARTER 2012-2013
U.S. consumer prices were up 1.7 percent from a year ago in December, one of the smallest increases
of the past 10 years. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 3.35 percent in December, a 0.6-
percentage point decline from a year ago. On January 30, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee kept
its target Fed Funds rate near zero, and stated its expectation that, "a highly accommodative stance of
monetary policy will remain appropriate for a considerable time," citing the current unemployment rate
above 6.5 percent. (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "ROCKY MOUNTAIN ECONOMY:
UPDATE." February 2013.)
See Attachment I 11
HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD
DEVELOPMENT
HOUSING PROGRAMS REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013
QUARTER3
(January 1, 2013 -March 31, 2013)
The Housing Program Division's funding sources for this fiscal year are the Community Development Block
Grant Program (CDBG), the HOi\t!E Program and Program Income from CDBG, HOME. Renter Rehab,
Ho11si11g Trust F1111d and Utah State Funding. Private Funding Sources are with GE Capital, Ally and
American Express.
The First Time Homebuyer Program, which uses HOME, CDBG, and private funding sources, has
placed 385 families in properties. This quarter, no houses were sold. Two properties are under contract and
we're waiting for the applicant to close. As of the end of the quarter, four homes are available for sale.
Applications arc beginning to increase.
First Time Home Buyer Loans
Fiscal YTD 3n1 Quarter
Loans Closed 6 0
Dollar Amount $736,595.00 S0.00
Average Per Loan $122,765.83 S0.00
The Housing Rehabilitation Program has completed 65 projects with 80 units this fiscal year. For the
second quarter, the rehabilitation staff closed 18 projects with 18 units.
Single Family Rehabilitation Projects
Fiscal YTD 3n1 Quarter
Loans Closed 60 18
Dollar Amount $559,572.98 S 192,303.41
Change Orders S 5,885.00 $85.00
Average Per Loan $9,424.30 $10,683.52
Number of Units 60 18
Average Per Unit $9,424.30 $10,683.52
Multi-Family Rehabilitation Projects
Fiscal YTD 3rd Quarter
Number of Projects 5 0
Dollar Amount $84,025.00 $0.00
Average Per Loan $16,805.00 $0.00
Number of Units 20 14
Average Per Unit $4,201.25 $0.00
We also assisted with another project but didn't manage the funding. In the 3rd quarter, we started our
direct mail campaign the first of March. We will start the four by four program in April. For the third quarter,
we received 39 rehab applications of which 4 were declined upon initial review. The number of applications
that passed the initial review was 12.9% higher than the third quarter oflast year. Of those declined, most are
rejected due to poor credit, high outstanding mortgage balances or high income. Several of those showing as
passing the initial review were placed on hold pending receipt of further information. We received 14 first time
home buyer applications of which 2 were declined during the pre-screening process. The number of FTHB
applications that passed the initial review was 300.0% higher than the third quarter of last year. During the
third quarter, we bid 10 projects, one more than last year.
Chart # 1 attached shows how many units and dollars of rehabilitation and new construction occurred in
each census track during the fiscal year-to-date. The list below shows a percentage of total dollars spent with
each funding source.
FUNDING SOURCES Fiscal YTD %OF 3rd Quarter %OF
07/01/12 - 3/31/13 FUNDS 1/01/13 - 3/31/13 FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant $ 622,725.66 42.0% $ 121,040.56 29.6%
Rental Rehab Funds $ 29,853.00 0.0% $ 29,853.00 0.0%
Personal Contributions $ 174,963.85 13.5% $ 14,071.85 15.1%
Private Funding Sources $ 95,354.00 8.0% $ 0.00 0.0%
Home $ 372,901.00 31.2% $ 0.00 48.1%
River Park Funds $ 86,733.00 5.0% $ 27,423.00 7.2%
Other Funds $ 3,547.47 0.3% $ 0.00 0.0%
TOTAL $ 1,386,077.98 100% $ 192,388.41 100%
Home prices are rising. We are still seeing multiple offers on homes we are researching. First Time Home
Buyer applications are increasing but many want product we don't have. We believe this is related to
uncertainty in the economy and the overall level of interest rates in the market. Market rates have increased
slightly. A thirty year mortgage can be obtained for between 3.375 and 3.625 percent. Our rates are not
substantially more affordable than the market at this time. We are evaluating other methods of outreach to try
to generate applications.
Quarterly Housing Report
For the Quarter From 1/1/2013 to 3/31/2013
[cap ID Project Name Project Address Valuation New Housing Units
BLD2012·09366 12/28/2012 REDFISH INVESTMENTS 1050 E WOOD Ave 130201005
BLD2012·09367 12/28/2012 REDFISH INVESTMENTS 1044 E WOOD Ave $130,000.00 130201006 2/1/2013 1
BLD2013·00671 2/7/2013 LOTUS BLUE KOi 1718 S 900 E $381,750.00 130207007 2/7/2013 5
BLD2013·00672 2/7/2013 LOTUS BLUE KOi 1716 S 900 E $381,750.00 130207006 2/7/2013 5
BLD2013-00673 2/7/2013 LOTUS BLUE KOi 1722 S 900 E $381,750.00 130207005 2/7/2013 5
-
• JS- .. ltSZHIL',&Jrnffidi,111ffii.-W
M,faiiThk••iif.'f+Mi,•t.l.,P- i:1't.'1'rn:W:t.r:r.':.i=tW~~1-11;u::1 mt•••
BL02012·06734 9/10/2012 Columbus Court Lot 7 74 E COLUMBUS Ct $350,000.00 130319019 3/19/2013
2/12/2013 CANNON OAKS LOT #2 1512 S CANNON OAKS $188,375.00 130328002 3/28/2013
Project Address Issued Date New Housing Units
1------ Permits tu ... NumbirofUfilti 'j
2
~~--------- permlli•.············7·:·:izi.l L. . :.,.9 t,.L./}• •. ).•·••·••·••i•••,;I .Jf\;;i:
Boarded Buildings Activity
3rd Quarter
January 1, 2013 through March 31, 2013
Existing Boarded buildings as of January 1, 2013
Vacant/Secure Buildings as of January 1, 2013*
Demolition
Resolved
New boarded buildings
Total boarded buildings March 31, 2013
Buildings vacant/secure March 31, 2013
52
123
2
5
5
50
120
*Properties, which are vacant, and complaints or activity is such that they
require monitoring, but not boarding.
Prepared by,
Diana Hansen
CLOSED/BOARDED HOUSES/APARTMENTS IN SALT LAKE CITY by
CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
Districts Boarded Buildings Vacant & Secured
Buildings
District #1 5 13
District #2 11 41
District #3 2 14
District #4 21 21
District #5 7 25
District #6 1 2
District #7 3 4
Total 50 120
SALT LAKE CITY HOUSING REPORT
2008 • 2012
\11.1dm11.:111.t
# CITY LOAN I AFFOROABlE #MARKET APPROVEO SOURCE OF OATEOF OATE & METHOO OF CASH FLOW AMENO. CONTRACT I VENOOR PROJECT DEVELOPER UNITS RATE UNITS FUNOS FUNOS STATUS COMMENTS LOAN FUNDS OISBURSAL AUDITOUE TERMS DATE NUMBER iNUMBER Pt-10< P,,n-Apat1mfanft Ob.an P1ooort'6s J21 000 Renter R~riati 8',cke, approved 2008 Dec 2008 01aws NA ' )(: yt!'dft liA .: °" C;t, JU F,! J~&48 44~ f.•,i lOO S0<rth Ben Log1-Kt 32 CompicttXJ F W'di dtS-bwst-0 in tj, aw,
I Hnhnh.t1Uhon Draw5 comnle-ted If' 2009
Picca,cty Aoitrlm@ritit K1!ttmmoc1it: Piot.lt'rt~s 40 J}O 000 Rer,1e1 Re'tab Becket approved 2008 Dec 2008 o,.,,. NA ' j\~ 'fei'.tf~ NA 72 ~ (;:J 3614j J~S 11 ~ Soutt-. 300 EatU Bt,n loguo Cornp!e:ed F undS d1Sbur1,ed in dta'HS
f1qhabllita!Jor, Draw, comoletftd ITT 2009
Cr1i11 Stielt~r !01 VbJftl!!n & Cfuk.freri YWBu1id1ng Hope 0AUC8 4h 500 GOO HIF Beckftf approved .2008 I 5:28,09 I 4'29110 · Vl1re I J.a11ua1y I O ~ JJ 'i1S. Last1 H:.:w .. I Nt, j,)6 ~ 0J,J'JJI! 4041S 32S Soutn 300 Cast YWCA Comple!ed Funds WU'ed ,n 2008
Nev.- CQl'\Struction Cash flow loan
Srri1fl1 Apartment Pro;ect Raasay Prcpert,es 08 1520()() RDA HiF Bec:ker approved 2008 j Oct 2009 j .. ,r,,oo, VJ1re I NA I ; , ,'~'lrS I 11,12,0:1 100 s ,04:;2q 4014s 228 S 200 E &682 6M E 700 S Ben Logue Comole!ed FUMs wi.red 1n 2009 Rehab1Ma!i0t1
T avlOr Swings Pm1ec1 Housing Authority of SLC ,5 500 000 RDA Hff Bec>,er apprO\led 2009 I 0c, 2009 I Draws I NA I j < iOFill\ I NA !Jt,,S •o 431:,/ 15847 1812 Soutti We5t Temrie Completed: Funds d1&bursed in dra-.vs New construction
P,erpcni Lofts Pterpont Lo~s 12 330000 HTf P10jecl Becker dpproved 2009 I NA I NON~ I NA I NA I NA I M I NA 929 West Pl6'rponl Paul Howelts & Kerth Nielion cancelled PrQ)ect canceled/
N(Yn' constrll(:tton no 1oar, fina11zed ,112010
I Nov 20091 I I 2
S8 yrs • 2 ,;r 1nterts• l 1bert>; C tyVV,t'k Apartm(""'ls CO'M>Oy Pa·tne•s 73 500(),)Q HTF Becker ar,~rove<J 2000 4,,ZQ,0 • \"JtH! NA Mr,'(:l',-f"i:.f'!1S. I NA !QI> 5 ·o43S9! -1•,n:, 280 tasl 200 ,outn Oar, Lofgren Comp1<1eo funds wired 61113t10 New conwuct,on
Partc Place Pr01ect Ceda, Pon1te Partner~ ,2, t4J 2'J1 RuAHTf '" Bec~er aopro-ve1 2C-09 j Oct ,009 I Dtaw, I NA I 5 JC yeJ1~ I NA jo,:,·~ :C,Ai91/ -!titl(4 731 So.-, 300 [as, JoriathanMorM• process Final draw 6/27!11 Ret1.ab1litat,oo
f reNJom l anc.t·r\(J Housing AU1N11 !fy of 5L C 11() 100 000 HOM[ f~kt'f Apptov~ 200\J I Jan 2010 l I Jan,..ar1 I:, .sJ,'t'<n, C.-i~11F1';JW I NA 1 ·, ,,.,,,••"·1 ,;,w 11)00 Vlest Nor1h Temr!e 2193]5 CDBG Comple!ed furrjs Wifed 1n 2010 ?010 · Wire Ret1uh,11tatio"
Pto>Jl,'.jt,t'I(:@ PlaCEt Waiatch Parlr\t>rs ~n 200 oc~J ROA HTF BecltPr approved 20 HJ I Der ,ow I 12111110. V,1tte I Jan,j.tty I S90 000 rc~e,._.e .tc...:! f no j NA J(.1!1.:, 11 5(>h{lj n121) 309 Ea51 100 Sow, <,p S""P""'" Comok:tcd Funct$ w,rOO 12113,10
NPW CMti!n.,ctron
St.llo S!rtwl Pla.td t Jnnacri P10,:iett1{'1, 1J,; .. 7~0 000 lo Bet:kC< Awrovod 2011 Apt!! 2012 VJiro 1n one ltJfnp 1ilJffl $"~0 !..10fL:t! 1 t!M ... )lif! rq I N,\ ,-,r, ~ 1; t~cr/ ,U'lfi~ ?37 2!°15 Sou1h State S!14*t Rtinlog1w ROA IITF pt()(('!",$ to I '~ 10 Y*'alS Nli'W Const111ct10NF acttrle r,re<ti'trv,1tion
74 f"IOf'th o• C 'U dtJ'tu al l'.VOOdruft Ap1.1r111'ent! t./OOdruff L andmar~ l P 45 1 500 OOG tJetkPr Ar,prow-MJ IO 11 j,1(1 2011 lit/'7012, Wire .s~no ti(KJ ,111~ I !1t-51.,1l'Ji41j 41R.?:J n; so,,s ,oo f "" Gary Nordhoff & Greq H..1Qhe5 l!lf Cornpit'>tlK'! funds V/1,en 1,7111012 '.lC veari Hehabil11a1,on . Vo!wl'llttf'f\ t.JI AmfJlt>CJt Vo!unHtetS of Ame,,,..,. ,. 100 OCQ HOMl Bec!o:fot ApprQ\I~ 20 11 Jan 2012 113i,,o,,. Ch«k $100 Q!;;; ..;) ii 1,t ,, ",Jj 0'-1',1, ~~ !ioutt1 500 L1tt Kath,,. Bray MATCH Complete<! Cherli: cl.A fo, SfiO 000 H()t,U:: MJ1t:h G•a,t I Ai:'(W\lf'O"l 1/31/2012
Wef\{J()II Ap.it•1•t1t;1f\! Cott1f\lfl• T F'Ci' Hund Monie l~ ' ,1M4V9!;i h Bet111:.:i1 Approved 201~· f't:oOll'9
I ~04 We,t :.!00 Nor.'h Man Mi~PVrtrh ()ff~II HTr PfOCi::>tlS
A,:blf,,1100
IG1tl1qf'I! Ap,1r,1N>ril$ C tv F font P1J1rner\ l IC ii /fi':, 000 HTf OerkPr Arpr0vf'>l12C1] Pf'n..11ng ,"; \ 13 iQ2tij -:i,1,(<' Nm w~tt Nntth r fl'ftlP"" ()anoo! Sh1ng-pr Complet~d C:onver1;10r1
Brvnswi!Ji: Apar1mtont, G G&OWoodruHtlC 1/l 'j 500000 H!f In jBPcket Approved 2012 I Pefldlftg 14~ Souto ,oo E•" Gary Nordhoff & Greg Huqhes p1ocess
N~ C001truct1on
Liberty V1llt19e ,n Sugar House L1Dt!'t1y Village Prope'1,es LLC1 35 1-"l 1SO 000 HH In JS.Xker Approved 2012
2150 S l,lcC1ell,1nd St CO'M'Kly Partners proce,~
New Const1uc:10., Dan Lofgren
Subtotal 1,092 189
TOTAL 1.281 1 6.724.614 200 1 919 998
PROJECTS UNDER CONSIDERATION
RDA AND HOUSING TRUST FUND QUARTERLY REPORTS LEDGER
Third Quarter - 2012-13
2012-13 - RDA HOUSING TRUST FUND CREDIT DEBIT BALANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE as of April 2, 2013 1,750,000.00
2012-13 - HOUSING TRUST FUND CREDIT DEBIT BALANCE
BEGINNING BALANCE as of April 2, 2013 2,080,002.17
CDC- Down payment Assistance-$51,505
NeighborWorks-Rebuild and Revitalize--$59,453
- - ~.
0
N
~
,:,: ..... ::;;: :,:
:: 0 - - ... - ..,... 0 - N - C· - - ,:,: - ::I = ,:,: - ;... E ..... - 0
"""
,_ - ... - - ~ - 'Z ,:,:
::I .,, 0 - • " - .:: - - ~I ·" - -
I
...
"' - = C:
>. s.. ,:,: =
.§
Q s.. c..
I - -
;:; " -:, ~ ·:; I ·,
"'
I ..,. .:;
.r
...,
"
., ...
.£.
~ c·
t ~
=~ O' it
*
Attachment 6
2012-2013
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
Subgrantee Organization: CDC Utah
Reporting Period: Jan 1 2013 to _M ............. a--r __ 3 __ 1 __ ..... 2~0 ..... 1 __ 3_
Month Day Year Month Day Year
1st Quarter ( July through September)
2nd Quarter (October through December)
3rd Quarter (January through March)
4th Quarter (April through June)
Report is due October 31st
Report is due January 31st
Report is due April 30th
Report is due July 31st
Note: An Annual Report is also due in
addition to the 4th Quarter Report Report is due July 31st
Submit all reports to: Steven Akerlow
Housing and Neighborhood Development
451 South State Street, Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5488
Phone: 535-7115
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
HOME quarterly reports shall be due to Salt Lake City no later than October 31, January 31, ,
April 30, , and July 31,. In addition to the quarterly reports, the annual report shall also be due
no later than July 31, 2013. Submit all reports to:
Steven Akerlow Phone: 535-7115
Housing & Neighborhood Development
451 South State St., Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5488
Numbers included in this report should only involve HOME funds received from Salt Lake
City, not the County or your entire budget.
NAME OF SUBGRANTEE ORGANIZATION: CDC Utah
PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME: Own in Salt Lake City Down Payment Assistance
CONTACT NAME: Jay Bladen CONTACT PHONE: 801.994.7222 x 204
CONTACT ADDRESS: 501 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84105
CONTACT EMAIL: jbladen@cdcutah.org
Tl ME PERIOD COVERED: -----=J=a:.:....:n __ ---=-1-----=2=0:;..:1c...::3_ to _ __:_:.M=a"-r __ 3=-1.:.....__=20=-1.:....:3=--
Month Day Year Month Day Year
Report the total number of clients served in the first column. In the second column report the
number of clients counted in the first column also claiming Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. If clients
only claim Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, include them first in the White race column. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
CODE RACE/ETHNICITY Total Number Hispanic
14 American Indian or Alaska Native 0 0
16 American Indian or Alaska Native and White 0 0
19 American Indian or Alaska Native and Black 0 0
or African American
13 Asian 1 0
17 Asian and White 0 0
12 Black or African American 0 0
18 Black or African American and White 0 0
15 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0
11 White 6 1
20 Balance of individuals reporting more than one race 0 0
TOTALS 7 1
INCOME INFORMATION
Indicate below the number of households/persons served in each income category below.
Please indicate whether you are serving households (H) or persons (P). Total numbers from
Income Information must match those from the Race/Ethnicity totals above. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
Number of clients assisted at 30% AMI or lower
Number of clients assisted between 31 % and 50% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 51 % and 60% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 61 % and 80% AMI
Total Number of Households/Persons Served during the Quarter:
0
1
0
6
7
FAIR HOUSING DATA
Number of clients assisted that are disabled
Number of clients assisted that are Female Head of Household
(must have children under the age of 18)
0
2
HOUSING ACTIVITIES
Types of housing activities: Rental housing development, property acquisition for home buyer
development, home owner housing development, home buyer assistance, housing rehabilitation
and tenant based rental assistance.
Types of activities NOT considered housing activities: Emergency shelter assistance and short-
term assistance to support homeless persons are considered public service activities, not
housing activities.
Homebuyer Assistance Activities:
Types of homebuyer assistance housing activities: Down payment and closing cost assistance,
gap financing, interest rate buy-downs, and subsidized second mortgages.
Of the total number of persons assisted, how many:
Are first time home buyers
Are receiving down payment/closing cost assistance
Are coming from subsidized housing
Are receiving housing counseling
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
7
7
0
7
7
7
1
1
0
0
Homebuyer Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted:
475 N Redwood Rd #5, 84116
751 W Genesee Ave, 84104
515 S 1000 E #301, 84102
1376 S Dokes Ln 84104
1460 W 800 S, 84104
1281 W 300 S, 84104
1053 N Capistrano Dr, 84116
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
This form is to be used to report on the funding provided by Salt Lake City for this grant.
Do not report 100% of your programmatic results unless Salt Lake City CDBG fully funded your program.
FY 12/ 13: lc.::1:::.st=-Q:o..t:::..r;:,,.,. =a.....1.:l 2::..:n=d:....:Q:,,.:t::.cr 'c.==.1.I 3::..:r..::d:....:Q...::t::.::r '-=.;XC=.L! 4..:..:t::ch...:,Qo.:::t::..:cr '==----1 Date Submitted: '-I __ __c4.._/ 1::..;0:.,./..:::2c.::..0::..:13:..J!
Name of Subrecipient: Communitv Develooment Corporation of Utah
Name of Proaram: CDBG Administration
Contact Person: Jean Barton I Phone#: (801) 994-7222 I Email: iean@cdcutah.ora
SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION & STATUS
One client HOPE3 orant 1994 (no file located): 8 Home clients for reconvevances oavoffs subordinations. etc.
SECTION II - RACE/ETHNICITY
1 ota] 'IF :,ervea I n1:, HISpamCJ
Race Category Qtr Latino
White 7 4
Black or African American
Asian
American Indian or Alaskian Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American
Multi-Racial Other 1
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 8 4
SECTION Ill - BENEFICARY INCOME
Income Category New/Continuing access to Improved access to Service or Service or Infrastructure no
(Median Family Income) Service or Infrastructure Infrastructure longer substandard
t:xtreme1y LOW
(<30% MFI) 1
very LOW
(31% to 50% MFI) 3
LOW/MOCI
(51%-79% MFI) 4
nu11-LUW l'IUU
(>80% MFI)
Totals: 8 0 0
SECTION IV - ACCESS TO SERVICES
Of All Reported Beneficiaries, How Many Are: # Clients
1. Disabled
2. Single Female Head of Household (with children under the age of 18) 2
SECTION V - PROGRAM FUNDS (List all sources of funding utilized in supporting this program)
PROGRAM FUNDS AMOUNT
ESG Funds
HOME Funds
HOPWA Funds
Other Federal Funds (including CDBG from other sources)
State/Local Funds
Private Funds
Other
Total $ -
SECTION VI - HOUSING INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
Of Owner Occupied Units: # Units
1. Units Occupied by Elderly: N/A
2. Units Moved from Substandard to Standard (HQS or Local Code) N/A
3. Section 504 Accessible Units N/A
4. Units Qualified as Energy Star N/A
5. Units Brought into Compliance with Lead Safety Rules (24 CFR Part 35) N/A
LBP Requirements: # Units
1. Housing Constructed pre 1978 N/A
2. Exempt Housing Constructed post 1978 N/A
3. Otherwise Except N/A
4. Except: No Paint Disturbed N/A
Lead Hazard Remediation Actions: (For REHAB ONLY) # Units
1. Lead Safe Work Practices (24 CFR 35.930(b)) (Hard Costs <=$5,000) N/A
2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices ( 24 CFR 35.930 ( c)) (Hard Costs $5,000 - $25,000) N/A
3. Abatement (24 CFR 35.930 (d)) (Hard Costs> $25,000) N/A
SECTIOIN VII - RENTER INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
,..,~ ... ff
Race Category (Renters) Served THIS Hispanic/ Income Category
Report "OWNERS" in Section II Qtr Latino Report "OWNERS" IN SECTION III Renters
White N/A Extremely Low < <30% MFI1 N/A
Black or African American N/A Very Low (31%-50% MFil N/A
Asian NIA Low/Mod (51%-79% MFI1 N/A
American Indian or Alaskian Native l'\17,lI; Non-Low Mod (>80% MFIJ N/A
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander N/A
American Indian or Alaska Native & White N/A
Asian and White N/A
Black or African American & White N/A
Am Indian/ Alaska Native & Black/ African Am N/A
Multi-Racial Other N/A
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 0 0
SECTION VIII: SHELTER ACTIVITIES - FILL IN SHADED AREAS ONLY
** This section is to be filled out by: CCS, Road Home, YWCA and any other organization that received funding under the "PUBLIC
SERVICE" category of the CDBG grant that provides support to Homeless individuals/families.
Of the total number of persons assisted: # Persons
Homeless Persons given Overnight Shelter
Beds Created (w/ this funding) in Overnight Shelter
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
This form is to be used to report on the funding provided by Salt Lake City for this grant.
Do not report 100% of your programmatic results unless Salt Lake City CDBG fully funded your program.
FY 12/ 13: L.:! 1:.:;s..;;.t -"'Q""tr"'". ==---J!c:;:2;,;.:n.:;;.d _,Q"""trc.;.".==,,1.;! 3c.;.r.;:;;d....::Q""t;:.;:r "-=,:..;X.._J 4..;;.t.:;;.h;....;Q;o,.;t;;;..r ·~=---1 Date Submitted: .... I ----'"4/'"'-'8c.!./_2_0_13c...il
Name of Subrecipient: NeighborWorks Salt Lake
Name of Proaram:
Contact Person: Geoff Hardies I Phone#: 801.539.1590 I Email: geoff@nwsaltlake.org
SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION & STATUS
Rehab and second mortgage lending
SECTION II - RACE/ETHNICITY
Toca, 'If :,ervea I nJ.:, n1spamCJ
Race Category Qtr Latino
White 4 1
Black or African American
Asian
American Indian or Alaskian Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American
Multi-Racial Other
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 5 1
SECTION III - BENEFICARY INCOME
Income Category New/Continuing access to Improved access to Service or Service or Infrastructure no
(Median Family Income) Service or Infrastructure Infrastructure longer substandard
extrernerv LOW
(<30% MFI)
Very Low
(31% to 50% MFI) 1
LOW/Moa
(51%-79% MFI) 3
11v11-1,,,uyy 1·1vu
(>80% MFI) 1
Totals: s 0 0
SECTION IV - ACCESS TO SERVICES
Of All Reported Beneficiaries, How Many Are: # Clients
1. Disabled 0
2. Single Female Head of Household (with children under the age of 18) 1
SECTION V - PROGRAM FUNDS (List all sources of funding utilized in supporting this program)
PROGRAM FUNDS AMOUNT
ESG Funds $ 171,422.00
HOME Funds $ -
HOPWA Funds $ 60,000.00
Other Federal Funds (including CDBG from other sources) $ -
State/Local Funds $ -
Private Funds $ 42,000.00
Other
Total $ 273,422.00
SECTION VI - HOUSING INFORMATION {Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
Of Owner Occupied Units: # Units
1. Units Occupied by Elderly: 0
2. Units Moved from Substandard to Standard (HQS or Local Code) 0
3. Section 504 Accessible Units 0
4. Units Qualified as Energy Star 0
5. Units Brought into Compliance with Lead Safety Rules (24 CFR Part 35) 0
LBP Requirements: # Units
1. Housing Constructed pre 1978 4
2. Exempt Housing Constructed post 1978 1
3. Otherwise Except 0
4. Except: No Paint Disturbed 0
Lead Hazard Remediation Actions: {For REHAB ONLY) # Units
1. Lead Safe Work Practices (24 CFR 35.930{b)) {Hard Costs <=$5,000) 3
2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices ( 24 CFR 35.930 ( c)) (Hard Costs $5,000 - $25,000) 0
3. Abatement (24 CFR 35.930 (d)) (Hard Costs > $25,000) 0
SECTIOIN VII - RENTER INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
IULClil 'If
Race Category (Renters) Served THIS Hispanic/ Income Category
Report "OWNERS" in Section II Qtr Latino Report "OWNERS" IN SECTION III Renters
White 0 0 Extremelv Low ( <300/o MFI 0
Black or African American 0 0 Verv Low (31%-500/o MFI 0
Asian 0 0 Low/Mod (51%-790/o MFI 0
American Indian or Alaskian Native u 0 Non-Low Moa(>800/o MFI 0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0
,
American Indian or Alaska Native & White 0 0
Asian and White 0 0
Black or African American & White 0 0
Am Indian/ Alaska Native & Black/ African Am 0 0
Multi-Racial Other 0 0
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 0 0
SECTION VIII: SHELTER ACTIVITIES - FILL IN SHADED AREAS ONLY
** This section is to be filled out by: CCS, Road Home, YWCA and any other organization that received funding under the "PUBLIC
SERVICE" category of the CDBG grant that provides support to Homeless individuals/families.
Of the total number of persons assisted: # Persons
Homeless Persons given Overnight Shelter
Beds Created (w/ this funding) in Overnight Shelter
2012-2013
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
Subgrantee Organization: _NeighborWorks Salt Lake
Reporting Period: _01/01/2013 to 3/31/2013
Month Day Year Month Day Year
1st Quarter ( July through September)
2nd Quarter (October through December)
3rd Quarter (January through March)
4th Quarter (April through June)
Report is due October 31st
Report is due January 31st
Report is due April 30th
Report is due July 31st
Note: An Annual Report is also due in
addition to the 4th Quarter Report Report is due July 31st
Submit all reports to: Steven Akerlow
Housing and Neighborhood Development
451 South State Street, Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5488
Phone: 535-7115
HOME QUARTERLY REPORT
HOME quarterly reports shall be due to Salt Lake City no later than October 31, January 31, ,
April 30, , and July 31,. In addition to the quarterly reports, the annual report shall also be due
no later than July 31, 2013. Submit all reports to:
Steven Akerlow Phone: 535-7115
Housing & Neighborhood Development
451 South State St., Room 406
PO Box 145488
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5488
Numbers included in this report should only involve HOME funds received from Salt Lake
City, not the County or your entire budget.
NAME OF SUBGRANTEE ORGANIZATION: - NeighborWorks Salt Lake
PROJECT/PROGRAM NAME:--------------------
CONTACT NAME:_Geoff Hardies_CONTACT PHONE: 801.539.1590
CONTACTADDRESS:_622 W. 500 N. SLC, UT 84116
CONTACT
EMAIL:_geoff@nwsaltlake.org _
TIME PERIOD COVERED: _01/01/2013 __ to __ 03/31/2013
Month Day Year Month Day Year
Report the total number of clients served in the first column. In the second column report the
number of clients counted in the first column also claiming Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. If clients
only claim Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, include them first in the White race column. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
CODE RACE/ETHNICITY
14 American Indian or Alaska Native
16 American Indian or Alaska Native and White
19 American Indian or Alaska Native and Black
or African American
13 Asian
17 Asian and White
12 Black or African American
18 Black or African American and White
15 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
11 White
20 Balance of individuals reporting more than one race
TOTALS
INCOME INFORMATION
Total Number
0 ---- ___ o_
__ o __
___ o
0 ---- __ o __
__ o __
1 -----
1
0 ----
Hispanic
_o _
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
o_
__ o __
2 0 __
Indicate below the number of households/persons served in each income category below.
Please indicate whether you are serving households (H) or persons (P). Total numbers from
Income Information must match those from the Race/Ethnicity totals above. Adding an
"Unknown" category is not acceptable. If necessary, make a best guess estimate.
Number of clients assisted at 30% AMI or lower
Number of clients assisted between 31 % and 50% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 51 % and 60% AMI
Number of clients assisted between 61 % and 80% AMI
Total Number of Households/Persons Served during the Quarter:
FAIR HOUSING DATA
Number of clients assisted that are disabled
Number of clients assisted that are Female Head of Household
(must have children under the age of 18)
HOUSING ACTIVITIES
__ o __
_1 _
_1 __
__ o __
_2 __
_o _
_o _
Types of housing activities: Rental housing development, property acquisition for home buyer
development, home owner housing development, home buyer assistance, housing rehabilitation
and tenant based rental assistance.
Types of activities NOT considered housing activities: Emergency shelter assistance and short-
term assistance to support homeless persons are considered public service activities, not
housing activities.
Homebuyer Assistance Activities:
Types of homebuyer assistance housing activities: Down payment and closing cost assistance,
gap financing, interest rate buy-downs, and subsidized second mortgages.
Of the total number of persons assisted, how many:
Are first time home buyers
Are receiving down payment/closing cost assistance
Are coming from subsidized housing
Are receiving housing counseling
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Homebuyer Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted:
Homebuyer Development Activities:
__ 2 __
2 _
o _
2. _
_o _
_o
o __
__ o __
__ o __
_o __
Types of homebuyer development housing activities: Property acquisition for homebuyer
housing development, new construction of homebuyer units and rehabilitation of existing units
for resale to homebuyers.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of those, how many units are restricted for those at 80% AMI
or less whether HOME assisted or not
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility:
Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed:
Number for households previously living in subsidized housing
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
__ 19 __
__ 12 __
__ 15 __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
Rental Housing Activities
Types of rental housing activities: Acquisition of existing units for rent, property acquisition for
new construction of rental units, new construction of rental units, rehabilitation of existing rental
units, and conversion of nonresidential structures into rental units.
Total number of housing units in entire project:
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting Energy Star Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Total number of units in entire project meeting 504 Accessibility Standards
Of those, how many are HOME assisted
Of the total owner units developed:
Number of units to be occupied by the elderly (62 and older)
Number of units set aside for persons with HIV/AIDS
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, number designated for the chronically homeless
Number of years the project will remain affordable
Number of units subsidized with project-based rental assistance
by another federal, state or local program
Number of units designated for homeless persons and families
including units receiving assistance for operations
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless
_2 _
_2 _
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
Permanent housing units designated for homeless persons and _O _
families including units receiving assistance for operations
Of those, the number of units for the chronically homeless O _
Homeowner Rehabilitation
Types of homeowner rehabilitation activities: All activities designed to make physical
improvements to owner-occupied housing units.
Total number of units in the entire homeowner housing rehab project:
Of those, the number of units to be occupied by the elderly
(62 and older)
Units moved from substandard to standard (HQS or local code)
Units qualified as meeting Energy Star Standards
Units made accessible that now meet Section 504 Standards
Units brought into compliance with lead safety rules
Rehab Project Addresses for which these HOME funds assisted, if applicable:
_o _
_o _
_o. _
_o _
_o _
__ o __
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
Types of tenant-based rental assistance activities: All direct rental assistance to tenants
(TBRA), and short-term assistance to households including security deposits.
Total number of households assisted:
Of those, how many receive short-term rental assistance
(not more than 3 mos.)
Of those, the number of chronically homeless households
Total number of housing units in entire program:
Of those, the number of units designated for the homeless
Of those, the number designated for the chronically homeless
Was this activity carried out by a faith-based organization? YES
_o _
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
__ o __
NO_X __
SALT LAKE CITY CDBG QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
This form is to be used to report on the funding provided by Salt Lake City for this grant.
Do not report 100% of your programmatic results unless Salt Lake City CDBG fully funded your program.
FY 12/ 13: ._! l_s_t _,,Q~tr_. ==-----!_2_nd__,Q._tr_.==......l 3_r_d .... Q._t_r.-=-X=J ... 4_t_h_Q..._t_r.-==--- Date Submitted: ,._! ------"4'-'/ 1::.:2::..f..::2..:..01::..:3:..J!
Name of Subrecipient: Salt Lake Citv Housina Division
Name of Program: Salt Lake Citv First Time Home Buyer and Rehabilitation Programs
Contact Person: Marion Barnhill I Phone #: 801-535-6216 I Email: marionbarnhill@slcgov.com
SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION & STATUS
Rehabilitation of residential units and the provision of the opportunity for low/moderate income households to purchase their
first homes. All of our oroorarns are on-oolno,
SECTION II - RACE/ETHNICITY
I Oec11 -ff ;::,erveu I n.1.;::, n1spamc,
Race Category Qtr Latino
White 16 4
Black or African American
Asian 2
American Indian or Alaskian Native
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
American Indian or Alaska Native and Black or African American
Multi-Racial Other
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 18 4
SECTION III - BENEFICARY INCOME
Income Category New/Continuing access to Improved access to Service or Service or Infrastructure no
(Median Family Income) Service or Infrastructure Infrastructure longer substandard
Extremely Low
( <300/o MFI) 2
very LOW
(310/o to 500/o MFI) 7
LOW/Moa
(51%-790/o MFI) 5
,~u, -._uvv r1uu
(>800/o MFI) 4
Totals: 0 0 18
SECTION IV - ACCESS TO SERVICES
Of All Reported Beneficiaries, How Many Are: # Clients
1. Disabled 3
2. Single Female Head of Household (with children under the age of 18) 2
SECTION V - PROGRAM FUNDS (List all sources of funding utilized in supporting this program)
PROGRAM FUNDS AMOUNT
ESG Funds
HOME Funds
HOPWA Funds
Other Federal Funds (including CDBG from other sources) $ 121,041.00
State/Local Funds $ 57,276.00
Private Funds $ 14,072.00
Other
Total $ 192,389.00
SECTION VI - HOUSING INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
Of Owner Occupied Units: # Units
1. Units Occupied by Elderly: 8
2. Units Moved from Substandard to Standard (HQS or Local Code) 17
3. Section 504 Accessible Units
4. Units Qualified as Energy Star
5. Units Brought into Compliance with Lead Safety Rules (24 CFR Part 35) 5
LBP Requirements: # Units
1. Housing Constructed pre 1978 17
2. Exempt Housing Constructed post 1978 1
3. Otherwise Except
4. Except: No Paint Disturbed 5
Lead Hazard Remediation Actions: (For REHAB ONLY) # Units
1. Lead Safe Work Practices (24 CFR 35.930(b)) (Hard Costs <=$5,000) 7
2. Interim Controls or Standard Practices ( 24 CFR 35.930 ( c)) (Hard Costs $5,000 - $25,000) 5
3. Abatement (24 CFR 35.930 (d)) (Hard Costs> $25,000)
SECTIOIN VII - RENTER INFORMATION (Assist, CDC, NeighborWorks & SLC HAND only)
torai 'ff
Race Category (Renters) Served THIS Hispanic/ Income Category
Report "OWNERS" in Section II Qtr Latino Report "OWNERS" IN SECTION III Renters
White Extremelv Low ( <30% MFI'
Black or African American Very Low (31%-50% MFI
Asian Low/Mod (51%-79% MFI'
American Indian or Alaskian Native Non-Low Mod (>80% MFI,
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
American Indian or Alaska Native & White
Asian and White
Black or African American & White
Am Indian/ Alaska Native & Black/ African Am
Multi-Racial Other
Grand Total of Clients served with SLC funding: 0 0
SECTION VIII: SHELTER ACTIVITIES - FILL IN SHADED AREAS ONLY
** This section is to be filled out by: CCS, Road Home, YWCA and any other organization that received funding under the "PUBLIC
SERVICE" category of the CDBG grant that provides support to Homeless individuals/families.
Of the total number of persons assisted: # Persons
Homeless Persons given Overnight Shelter
Beds Created (w/ this funding) in Overnight Shelter
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ECONOMY: UPDATE
February 2013 (see Economic Indicators data below)
The economy of the Rocky Mountain region continued to strengthen in the fourth quarter of 2012. Seasonally
adjusted nonfarm payrolls increased by 39,000 jobs, or 0.8 percent, from the previous quarter, to about 5.12 million
jobs. Payrolls were up by 115,000 jobs, or 2.3 percent, from a year ago. For the past 2 years North Dakota has had
the fastest rate of job growth in the region (and the U.S.); nonfarm payrolls increased by 18,000 jobs, or 4.5 percent,
from a year ago. In Colorado, Utah, Montana and South Dakota, payrolls increased by 49,000, 35,000, 10,000 and
3,000 jobs, or 2.2, 2.9, 2.4 and 0.7 percent, respectively. In Wyoming, nonfarm payrolls were essentially unchanged
from a year ago. The unemployment rate for the region averaged 6.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, down
from 6.7 percent a year earlier and during the previous quarter. Unemployment rates within the region ranged from
3.1 percent in North Dakota to 7.7 percent in Colorado. The U.S. rate was 7.8 percent in fourth quarter 2012, down
from 8.7 percent a year ago.
U.S. nonfarm payrolls in the fourth quarter were up by 2.17 million jobs from a year earlier, and payrolls were up by
537,000 jobs from the previous quarter. Sectors with large gains in the fourth quarter included professional and
business services, education and health services, and leisure and hospitality. Combined, those sectors added about
295,300 jobs. In addition, the construction and retail trade subsectors added 45,000 and 123,400 jobs, respectively.
This growth was partly offset by a loss of 40,300 jobs in the government sector, including 25,700 local government
jobs, and a slight decrease in manufacturing payrolls.
U.S. Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) decreased slightly in the fourth quarter of 2012. BEA emphasized that this
advance estimate is subject to revision. The decline was largely attributable to decreases in private inventory
investment, exports, and federal government spending. Those were partially offset by increases in personal
consumption expenditures, residential and nonresidential fixed investment, and a decline in imports (imports are
subtracted in the GDP calculation). The Conference Board's Index of Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) for the
U.S. rose 0.5 percent in December, to 93.9. The LEI was unchanged in November, but increased 0.3 percent in
October. The University of Michigan Index of Consumer Sentiment stood at 72.9 in December, down from 82.7 in
November, but up from 69.9 a year earlier. Despite the unexpected decrease in GDP, the continued strength in
consumer spending and business investment, as well as improvements in the housing sector, suggest the economy
should grow at a moderate pace during 2013.
Housing construction increased in the fourth quarter. The annualized rate of new-home starts for the U.S. in
December was up 12 percent from November, to 954,000 units, and up 37 percent from the rate of697,000 units a
year ago. Based on permits issued, homebuilding within the region was up strongly in fourth quarter 2012,
compared with a year ago. Although permits were down 24 percent in Wyoming, increases in the other states in the
region ranged from 17 percent in Montana to 120 percent in South Dakota. In Utah and Colorado, the number of
homes permitted increased 24 and 90 percent, to 3,100 and 6,000 homes, respectively. Apartment vacancy rates in
fourth quarter 2012 were down from a year ago in the Denver-Aurora-Broomfield and Colorado Springs metro areas
in Colorado, and in Utah's Wasatch Front metro areas (including Salt Lake City). The U.S. rental vacancy rate was
essentially unchanged from a year ago. Sales of existing single-family homes were up 21 and 7 percent in the
Denver-Aurora and Salt Lake City metro areas, respectively. Prices for existing single-family homes were also up
strongly, 12 and 13 percent, respectively. For the U.S., existing home sales in December were up 11 percent from a
year ago, and prices were up 10 percent. Distressed mortgages ( defined as home loans 90 or more days delinquent,
in foreclosure, or in REO) were down from a year ago in both the region and the U.S., to 3.6 and 7.1 percent of
mortgages, respectively.
U.S. consumer prices were up 1.7 percent from a year ago in December, one of the smallest increases of the past 10
years. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 3.35 percent in December, a 0.6-percentage point decline from a
year ago. On January 30, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee kept its target Fed Funds rate near zero, and
stated its expectation that, "a highly accommodative stance of monetary policy will remain appropriate for a
considerable time," citing the current unemployment rate above 6.5 percent.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Percen: Change
Indicator Data as of Most Recent Previous
Year /Igo Previous
Year Ago Source
\1011:h[Q:t Month/Qtr Morth/Qtr
Nonfarm Employment (thousands, seasonally adjusted):
Colorado 2012:Q4 2,315 2,2% 2,26& 0.8% 2.2% BLS
Montana 2012:Q4 435 433 425 0.5% 2.4% !lLS
North Dakota 10D.Q4 422 421 404 0.2% 4.5% ALS
S01.th Dakota 2012:Q4 4C9 409 406 O.O"h 0.7% BLS
Utah 2012:Q4 1.256 1.236 1,221 1.6% 2.9% ers
Wyoming 2012:Q4 287 290 287 1.0~{ 0.0% BLS
Rcckv Mountain Region 2012:Q4 S.124 S.085 5,009 0.8% 2.3% BLS
United SIJlt>, 2012:Q4 134.455 133,918 132,287 0.4% 1.5% BlS
Unemployment Rate (seasonally adjusted %):
Colorado 2012:Q4 1.7 8.2 8.0 C.5 0.2 eis
Montana 2012:Q4 5.8 6.3 6.7 -C.4 -0.9 !JLS
North Dako:a 201:1:Q4 3.1 3.0 3.4 0.2 ·O.~ flLS
South O.iko:a 2012:Q4 4,4 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 BLS
Utah 2012:Q4 5.2 5.7 6.0 -C.6 -0.8 BLS
Wyoming 2012:Q4 5.0 5.6 5.7 C.6 -0.7 BLS
Rocky Mo1.n:ain Region 2012:Q4 6.2 6.7 G.7 -0.4 -0.4 BLS
United State, ,012:Q4 7.8 8.0 87 -C., -0.8 BLS
GDP Growth Rate(%, SAARI - United States 2012:Q4 -0.1 3.1 4.1 -3.2 -4.2 SEA
U.S. Housing Starts (Annual Rate, SA) Dcc-12 954,0CO 851,000 697,000 12% 37% Census Bureau
Residential Building Permits. Colorado 2012:Q4 5,986 6,037 3,145 -1% 90% Census BWl"dU
Mont and 2012:Q4 615 613 526 0% lH\ Census Bure.au
North Dako:a 2012·Q4 1.883 2.398 997 -21% 89% Census Bureau
South Dako:a 2012:Q4 861 1,155 391 -25% 120% Census Bu'"eau
Utah 2012:Q4 3,131 3,200 2,533 2o/c 24% Census Bureau
Wyoming 2012:Q4 421 582 557 ·28% ·24% Census Bu•eau
Rot ky Mrn.n:..tin RPt)on ]01]·Q4 17,8q7 H.'lR5 R,14'l -R% 58o/, ft'fl ... tJ\ RU't"riU
Rental Vacancy Rates(%}:
Co oraco Spr,ngs metro area 2012:Q4 5.6 5.8 6.4 ·0.1 -0.8 Apartrrent lns,gh,s
Ot?n·,er-Aurora-Sroon·field metro are.J 2012:Q4 s.c 4.8 5.5 0.2 -0.5 Aportrrent lnsigh:s
SJlt Lake C1tyiWasatch Front metro areas 2012:Q4 3.8 3.9 4.3 ·0.1 -0.5 Reis, Ire.
Unitec States 2012:Q4 8.7 8.6 8.8 0.1 -0.1 CensJs Bureau
Existing Single-Family Home Sales: Denver-Aurora MSA
Number of Sales (NSA! 2012:Q4 8.:1c 9,751 6.730 -168% 20.5% Harley Wood LLC
Averaee Priu·• 2012·Q4 $298,957 $304,132 $267.658 ~1.7% 11.7% Hdrley Wood LLC
Existing Single-Family Home Sales: Salt Lake City MSA
Number of Sales (NSA) 2012:Q4 3,452 4,107 3.228 ~15.9% 6.9% Hanley Wood UC
Average Price 2012:Q4 $273,934 $268,317 $243,375 2 1% 12.6% Hanley Wood LLC
Existing Single-Family Home Sales: United States
Annual Ratp of Sale, (5A) On-12 4,130,00C 4,350,000 3,890,000 -0.7% 113% NAR
l\verage Price Dec-12 $230,70C $227,800 $209,800 1.3% 10.0% NI\R
Mortgages 90+ days delinquent, foreclosed, or
Rocky Mountain Region Dec-12 3.6 3.7 4.2 -0.1 -0.6 LPS App'ied Analytics
Unitcc States Dcc-12 7.1 7.2 7.6 -0.1 -0.5 LPS App'icd Analytics
Avg. 30-Year Mortgage lntne,t RatP Ot'f-17 BS 335 3.96 0.00 -0.61 Fr~ddiP Mac
Consumer Price Index -All Items:
Denver-Bou leer CMSA 2nd Half 2012 22E.2 223.0 221.5 1.4% 2.rn BLS
Un,ted Sta:es (NSA) Dec-12 229.6 230.2 225.7 -0.3% 1.7Y, BLS
lnde~ of Consumer Scn:1mcnt· Dec 12 72.9 82.7 69.9 -1:.9% 4 3Yo Univ. of M1:h1gan
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 ofl
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance •.• .- ·,, .·· ·
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 2013-Hsss1-ur.0J ·,
Application Correspondence I. Switch. to __ . ·: _, Jf.J!
Application Handbook Submit Application
Overview • Application submitted and last updated on 09-Jul-2013
Applicant
Information
Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
httos://irrants.oip.usdoj.gov/gmsextemal/submitApplication.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 2013-Hsss1-ur-0J
Help/Frequently Submit Application
Asked Questions
Page 1 of 1
Your application for the BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
GMS Home Grant (JAG) Program: Local has been successfully submitted. You will no
longer be able to edit any information submitted'. However, you can log in any
Log off time to view the application information.
You will be contacted by the Program Office when your application is
. processed or any other action ls required by you.
httns:// zrants.oin.usdoj .gov /gmsexternal/submitApplication.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 of 1
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 2013-Hsss1.u1-0J
Correspondence [------·-··'. -----------·-··"··-····-·· ······-· ·········-·-,· --
Switch to ... ~ 1i ·------·-··-·-----·--·-····---------------···--------- ... JI
Overview
This handbook allows you to complete the application process for applying
to the BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Program: Local. At the end of the application process you will have the
opportunity to view and print the SF-424 form.
*Type of Submission Application Non-
Construction
*Type of Application New
If Revision,select
appropriate option
If Other, specify
*Is applicatlon subject to review by No Program is not covered by E.O. 12372
state executive order 12372
process?
https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmsextemal/application.do?aspect=Application&applicationl... 07/09/2013
--· --
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Freguently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
Page 1 of2
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance •.. ,;.-
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 2013-Hsss1-uT-DJ · · _ -·
. .
Correspondence
Applicant Information
*Is the applicant delinquent on any federal No debt
*Employer Identification Number (EIN) 87-6000279
*Type of Applicant Municipal
Type of Applicant (other):
*Organizational Unit · Salt Lake City Police Department
*Legal Name (Legal Jurisdiction Name) Salt Lake City
*Vendor Address 1 315 East 200 South
Vendor Address 2 PO Box 145497
*Vendor City Salt Lake City
Vendor County/Parish
*Vendor State Utah
*Vendor ZIP 84114-5497
Point of Contact Information for matters involving this application
contact Prefix: Ms.
Contact Prefix (Other):
Contact First Name: Jordan
Contact Middle Initial:
Cotnact Last Name: Smith
Contact Suffix:
Contact Suffix (Other):
Contact Title: Grants Acquisition & Project Coordinator
Contact Address Line 1: 315 East 200 South
Contact Address Line 2: PO Box 145497
contact City: Salt Lake City
httns://!!rants.oio.usdoi.gov/gmsexternal/applicantlnformatio_?Ao 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page2 of2
Contact State: Utah
Contact Zip Code: 84114-5497 ·
Contact Phone Number: (801) 799-3357
Contact Fax Number: (801) 799-3640
Contact E-mail Address: jordan.srnlth@slcgov.com
httns ://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/ gmsexternal/applicantlnformation.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 of 1
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
· Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 201a-Hsss1-UT-DJ
·Correspondence [ . ., - ;
Switch to... · :
·-~'""'" ... - .. -m,w••-- ..... •---·-··~--•H ,o W•••--• .W .. HHH-• , ..... :
Project Information
Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project
Salt Lake Area .JAG
Areas Affected by Project
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County (2 Jurisdictions)
Proposed Project
*Start Date October/ 01/ 2013
*End Date September/ 30/ 2016
*Congressional Districts of
Congressional District 01, UT
Project Conqresslonel District 02, UT
Congressional District 03, UT
*Estimated Funding
Federal $302369.00
Applicant $0.00
State $0.00
Local $0.00
Other $0.00
..
Program Income $0.00
TOTAL $302369.00
httns://~ants.oi-o.usdoi.gov/gmsextemal/projectlnformation.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 of 1
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant {JAG) Program: Local 2013-Hsss1-uT-oJ
Correspondence
Budget and Program Attachments
This form allows you to upload the Budget Detail Worksheet, Program
Narrative and other Program attachments. Click the Attach button to
continue. ·
Abstract.Qdf
Program Narrative.Qdf
Bui;lget WQC~:[ibeet,!2cif
Budget Narr51tlve. Ddf
Review Narratjve.gdf
~!:IDQrandf;! Qf Uoci!:C:[itaacing.12df
Public Commi::ot.i;:idf
Your files have been successfully attached, but the application has not been
submitted to OJP. Please continue with your application.
httos://u:rants.oip. usdoj .gov/ gmsextemal/budget.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 of2
Application
Application Handbook
Overview
Applicant
Information
Project Information
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Application
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
Correspondence
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 201s-Hsss1-ur-0J
Assurances and Certifications
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this
application/preapplication is true and correct, the document has been duly
authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant will
comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded.
Your typed name, in lieu of your signature represents your legal binding
acceptance of the terms of this application and your statement .of the
veracity of the representations made in this application. The document has
been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the
applicant will comply with the following:
1. Assurances
2. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment. Suspension and Other
Responsibility Matters: and Drug-Free Workplace requirements.
If you are an applicant for any Violence Against Women grants, this
includes the Certification of Compliance with the Statutory Eligibility
Requirements of the Violence Against Women Act.
*Prefix Chief
Name Prefix:(Other)
*First Name Chris
Middle lnitiaflif anv)
*Last Name Burbank
Suffix
Name Suffix:(Other)
*Title Chief of Police
*Address Line 1 315 East 200 South
Address Line 2 PO Box 145497
*Cltv Salt Lake Citv
County
*State Utah
*ZioCode 84114-5497
*Phone 801-799-3802 Ext:
Fax 801-799-3640
*E-mail chris .burbank®slcgov .com
~ I have examined the information provided here
regarding the signing authority and certify it is accurate. I
httos ://2rants.oip.usdoi.gov/ gmsextemal/applicationAssurance.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 2 of2
am the signing authority, or have been delegated or
designated formally as the signing authority by the
appropriate authority of official, to provide the information
requested throughout this application system on behalf of
this jurisdiction. Information regarding the signing
authority, or the delegation of such authority, has been
placed in a file and is available on-site for immediate
review.
httos://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/gmsextemal/applicationAssurance.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 1 of2
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant (JAG) Program: Local 201a-Hsss1-uT-oJ
Application Correspondence
Review SF-424 Print a Copv
Application Handb
Overview·
ook APPLICATION FOR 2, DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE July 09, 2013
1, TYPE OF SUBMISSION 3. DATE'RECEIVED BY State Application Identifier
STATE
Application Non-Construction
'
4, DATE RECEIVED BY Federal Identifier
FEDERAL AGENCY
ion
5.APPLICANT INFORMATION ..
Legal Name Organizational Unit
Salt Lake City Salt Lake Oty Police
Department
Address Name and telephone
number of the person to
315 East 200 south
be contacted on matters
PO Box 145497
involving this application
on Salt Lake City, Utah
84114-5497 Smith, Jordan
{801) 799-3357
6, EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) 7, TYPE OF APPLICANT
87-6000279 Municipal
8. TYPE OF APPLICATION 9, NAME OF FEDERAL
AGENCY
New Bureau of Justice Assistance
10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE . 11, DESCRIPnYE-TITLE OF
-·· .APPLICANT'S PROJECT.
NUMBER: 16.738
CFDA EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE
Salt Lake Area JAG
TITLE: ASSISTANCE GRANT PROGRAM
12, AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County {2 Jurisdictions)
13. PROPOSED PROJECT 14. CONGRESSIONAL
Start Date: October 01, 2013
DISTRICTS OF
End Date: September 30, 2016
a.
Applicant
b. Project UT01 UT02
UT03
15, ESTIMATED FUNDING 16. IS APPLICATION
Federal 1$302,369
SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY
STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER
I
Applicant
Information
Project Informat
Budget and
Program
Attachments
Assurances and
Certifications
Review SF 424
Submit Applicati
Help/Frequently
Asked Questions
GMS Home
Log Off
httos:/ / grants.oip.usdoj .gov/ gmsexternaVapplicationReview.do 07/09/2013
BJA FY 13 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: Local Page 2 of2
Applicant $0 12372 PROCESS?
State $0
Program is not covered by
Local $0 E.O. 12372
Other $0
Program Income $0 17. IS THE APPLICANT
DEUNQUENT ON ANY
FEDERAL DEBT?
TOTAL $302,369
N
18. TO.THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION
PREAPPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORIZED BY GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL
COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS REQUIRED.
httns:// zrants.oin.usdoi ,gov/ gmsextemal/applicationReview .do 07/09/2013
2013 JAG ABSTRACT
NAME: City of Salt Lake
TITLE OF PROJECT: Salt Lake Area 2013 JAG for police technology, training and
overtime; support staff for courts and treatment of substance abuse.
GOALS OF PROJECT: To increase effective law enforcement/criminal justice
programs; to meet unfunded public safety needs.
DESCRIPTION OF STRATEGIES:
The Salt Lake City area has been determined a disparate region. Salt Lake City receives
the majority of the funds in the County, and has been-determined to be the agency to
submit the application. The application includes Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County,
for which this program will provide funding. Each jurisdiction has attempted to organize
a project that addresses the Purpose Areas of the JAG program.
These projects fall into six of the purpose areas. Technology and training continue to be
the most significant needs of the law enforcement organizations and the courts, along
with the need for staff to carry out treatment of substance abuse. Through this proposal,
these two jurisdictions will have better law enforcement/criminal justice technology, will
gain important training, purchase essential technology and will enhance their abilities to
carry out other government services through contractual services and hiring personnel to
carry out their objectives. These services include drug and alcohol treatment, prevention
and education programs, and the courts will be able to better serve clientele in their
substance abuse programs.
PROJECT IDENTIFIERS: Community Policing
Conferences and Training
Overtime
Equipment- General
Reentry··
2013 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County
The Salt Lake City area has been identified as a disparate region. Salt Lake City receives the
majority of the funds in the County, and has been determined to be the best agency to submit the
application. This application includes two jurisdictions, Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County, for
which this program narrative will address. This narrative is divided by jurisdic ti.on.
SALT LAKE CITY:
As the rest of the nation is experiencing a major downturn in the economy, Salt Lake City is
experiencing similar issues. During recent budget cycles, the police department has been forced
to cut back its budget, while attempting to provide the same level of service that residents are
accustomed to enjoying. Through close examination of the budget, we have attempted to make
cuts in capital expenditures ( equipment and supplies) while keeping the level of service stable.
Despite best efforts to maintain the level of service, the SLCPD has been forced to cut positions
and entire programs that serve the citizens in our community. 'The JAG Program is a timely
support to law enforcement agencies as we attempt to ensure public safety in times of economic
hardship.
The Salt Lake City Police Department (SLCPD) will attempt to address a wide range of issues
through the use of 2013 JAG Program. We are dedicated to supporting all facets of criminal
justice and have collaborated with local and county agencies in providing high quality
prevention, intervention and interdiction programs for youth and adults. Through this grant,
SLCPD will continue many of the activities that have, in past years, become a successful part of
the JAG program. Additionally, we will be able to take a step closer to restoring some of our
programs to the levels they had been before budget cuts were required.
Purpose Area 1: Law Enforcement Programs
A portion of the funding will be used to support directed overtime projects for community
policing. The department works closely with neighborhood residents and businesses to address
issues that arise within their neighborhoods. An example of this is a significant drug and violence
problem in the Pioneer Park area. Funds will be set aside to provide additional patrols and
crackdowns on drug activity in the park and surrounding neighborhood. Other examples are the
problems with loud parties and underage drinking in the neighborhoods surrounding the
University of Utah, traffic issues/speeding, vandalism, and car prowls in different
neighborhoods. This funding will allow the department to concentrate on areas in need until the
problem is mitigated. The SLCPD will continue to monitor progress and adjust strategies as
needed. The cost of this project is $25,000.
When budget cuts occur, training is often the first to go. In Salt Lake City, training has
diminished to negligible levels. In an attempt to provide the level of training needed to sustain
1
professional levels of service, funding will address training for both sworn and civilian
employees. Civilian employees are an integral part of the police department. They are
responsible for providing the assistance officers need to police the city. Their duties can be very
technical in nature, as well as professional and administrative. Training for these employees may
include technological areas such as computer aided dispatch (CAD), records management
systems (RMS), victim advocacy, and crime analysis. It could also include administrative .
training for grant management, accounting, crime scene investigations, evidence gathering and
storage, etc. Sworn officers will receive training in areas such as public order, leadership,
special tactical training, narcotics, gangs, terrorism/homeland security, K9, motorcycle/vehicle,
traffic, internal affairs and other investigative specialized training. No division may use training
funds from this grant unless their general fund division training funds have been obligated, .
encumbered or depleted. This project provides our employees the most up-to-date training in
evidence-based law enforcement programs. The cost of this project is $25,000 for sworn
personnel training and $25,000 for civilian personnel training.
It is essential that officers maintain a high level of fitness in order to carry out their
responsibilities as police officers. The department will utilize funds to replace broken and worn
out fitness equipment while also providing necessary repairs or maintenance to meet officer
needs. The SLCPD received $25,482 for fitness equipment in the 2010 JAG that will allow the
department to purchase a portion of the needed equipment. The department will utilize funds
from 2013 JAG to purchase additional fitness equipment that was not in the 2010 JAG budget.
The cost for this project is $5,000 for maintenance+ ($5,000 per piece of equipmentX 5 pieces)
= $30,000.
The SLCPD will utilize a portion of JAG funding to increase recruitment efforts for department
positions. It is essential that the police department employ qualified individuals and that effort
begins with recruitment. The project will focus on recruitment for both civilian and swam
positions, each of which is essential to the mission of the police department. In the past,
recruitment efforts have been coordinated only through the police department's public relations
unit due to limited funding. JAG funds will enable the department to enhance efforts and
leverage all units to participate in recruitment. The project will include department registration
fees for recruitment events, development and printing costs for information pamphlets, and other
materials to disseminate at recruiting events. Total cost for the project is $10,069.
The SLCPD budget reductions have forced units across the department to consider cost cutting
strategies. Several units in the deparlment have necessary costs that fall outside of their allocated
budget. One such unit is the K.9 squad. The department will utilize funds to cover veterinary bills
and necessary supplies only after the K9 squad's general fund budget has been obligated,
encumbered or depleted. Total cost for the project is $5,000.
Purpose Area 3: Prevention and Education
The SLCPD will continue to work with Salt Lake Peer Court to give youth positive al temati.ves
to crime. The Peer Court Program gives first and second time offenders training in problem
solving, decision making and positive adult and youth role models to mentor them in meaningful
and constructive activities. The program leverages resources in the areas of gang prevention,
2
tutoring, family support programs, anger management and mentoring as well as many other local
programs. In fact, it is a requirement of the program. The Peer Court Program's budget is
attained strictly through grants, and through this program we will provide funding for supplies as
well as a portion of the salaries of the director and part-time employees. This program targets
· reentry and smart probation. The contract will provide Peer Court with. $15,000 to enhance their
targeted prevention program. ·
Purpose Area 6: Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement Programs
Surveillance cameras project: The SLCPD will purchase five surveillance cameras, three of
which will be installed in the high crime area of Pioneer Park and_two will be installed in the Salt
Lake homeless shelter area. The areas, known for narcotics and other illegal activity, have long
been troublesome neighborhoods for the police department In response to the high crime rates,
the department will install surveillance cameras to deter illegal activity and provide crucial
evidence. The SLCPD received an award from the MetLife Foundation which the department
will utilize to purchase a fourth camera and fiber for Pioneer Park. The department ensures there
will be no duplication of funds. The total cost for the surveillance cameras project is $7,000 per
cameraX 5 cameras= $35,000.
The SLCPD will utilize funds to equip police officers with on-body camera systems. The units
provide extreme value and crucial benefit to police officers as they perform the essential tasks of
law enforcement. In addition to operational value, the units provide a tool for transparency that
captures the professionalism of officers and accurately documents the physical and emotional
evidence during calls for service or on-going investigations. The value of this evidence is crucial
when cases are presented in court as it ensures that events are accurately documented. The
department will utilize funds to purchase LO on-body camera systems. Cost for the project is
$3,500 camera system x. 10 systems= $35,000.
SALT LAKE COUN1Y:
Salt Lake County's JAG proposal includes projects from several different purpose areas. These
projects represent a wide variety of criminal justice programs that provide services to a wide
spectrum of the County's population.
Purpose Area 1: Law Enforcement Program Narratives:
The Unified Police Department is run by the SaltLake County Sheriff that serves I 0
communities and unincorporated Salt Lake County. By combining a variety of police services
under one organization, communities can share the costs and reduce citizen tax burdens.
The UPD needs an additional 15 Taser® X2 second generation units for the Protective Services
Unit for security at the District Court Houses and outlying County facilities to enhance public
and officer safety. The units will provide all Protective Services Officers with the necessary
equipment to enhance public and officer safety at courthouses and county facilities. Total cost
for the project: 15 units X $1,400 = $21,000.
3
Purpose Area 2: Prosecution and Court Programs
When offenders are ordered to pay victim restitution, there really is no effective process in place
to hold them accountable for making those payments. The Salt Lake County District Attorney
has created a Restitution Team comprised of attorneys and support staff that will help us
complete our conversation with crime victims by immediately holding offenders accountable for
the restitution they have been ordered to pay by the court. In order for this team to function
effectively, the services of a legal investigator are needed to aggressively pursue collection of
victim restitution by questioning employment and income, qualified accounts and assets of
offenders. While we do not currently have a full time investigator to dedicate to this team, we
would like our current team of investigators to provide approximately 19 hours of overtime hours
per month to the functions of the restitution recovery team.
Legal Investigator Overtime: 230 Overtime Hours X $33.44/hour = $7,691.20
Fringe Benefits: 1 X $2,308.80 = $2,308.80
Total cost for project: $7,691.20 + $2,308.80 = $10,000
Purpose Area 4: Corrections and Community Corrections Programs
The Division of Criminal Justice Services provides services that are court ordered as an
alternative to incarceration in Salt Lake County. The Division serves clients referred by both
District and Justice Court jurisdictions. The Division will utilize funds to enhance training
opportunities to support various program units so as to improve skills and abilities of the case
management, treatment, and support staff At $100 per attendee, the program will allow for staff
and stakeholders to be trained in case management, treatment and evidence-based practices
throughout the year. The total cost for this program will be $9,406.
Purpose Area 5: Drug Treatment and Enforcement Programs
The Division of Youth Services provides a wide range of services to provide safety, shelter and
support to the youth in the Salt Lake Valley. This includes Substance Abuse Day Treatment
services offered through our Riverton office that is comprised of counseling and support
programs for youth dealing with substance abuse issues. This division will utilize funding to
provide 48% of the personnel costs for one full-time equivalent licensed mental health
professional to staff the Substance Abuse Day Treatment program. Supplement to the County
money received by our division is essential to keep this program in existence. This program is
instrumental in reducing the number of youth with substance abuse issues who without
assistance may end up incarcerated due to their addiction problems. Total cost fortbis program:
$75,000 * 48% = $36,000
Purpose Area 6: Planning, Evaluation. and Technoloty Improvement Pro2rams
The Division of Criminal Justice Services will utilize funds to improve the C-Track Management
Information System though adjustments and modifications to the current platform..
Improvements will include expansion of Ce'Irack modules, addition of the Pretrial Risk Study
Instrument and other priorities deemed necessary by the programming staff. Modifications
4
needed are not available through CJS internal staff. Currently programmers from Experis, Inc.
adjust and fine tune the MIS and will take on additional tasks to accomplish the program goals
outlined above. Total cost for the project: 125 hours X $96 per hour= $12,000.
The Unified Police Department is implementing a Real Time Crime Center (tactical analysis
center/command center) which will house UPD analysts to provide proactive crime analysis to
reduce crime and enhance officer safety and productivity. UPD has been awarded a State Asset
Forfeiture Grant to purchase a VCAP Analysis System which works in conjunction with the
current UPD's Versadex records management system. However, the grant did not cover the cost
of the necessary IBM Intel ES-2658 Server which is required to host the VCAP software. UPD
will utilize JAG funds to purchase the necessary server to host the software for the VCAP
Analysis System for the UPD Real Time Crime Center. Total cost for project: $8,894 (any
additional server cost will be paid by UPD ).
5
FY2013 JAG Budget Worksheet
Purpose Area Allocated Amount
TOTAL COMBINED PROJECT COST 302,369.00
FY 2013 JAG BUDGET NARRATIVE
Joint Aru>lication
Allocations Summary by Purpose Area
Purpose Area Allocated Amount
SALT LAKE CITY
Purpose Area 1: Law Enforcement Programs
Directed Community Policing Overtime projects to include enforcement of loud parties, Pioneer
Park operations, Vice operations, tracking sex offenders, street racing, targeted crime hot spots,
etc: 555.55@ $45/hour = $25,000.
Sworn personnel training to include: fusion center training, FBI, gangs, narcotics, homeland
security, accident investigations, K9, and other investigative specialized training: 16 officers X
$1,562.50 ($592.50 airfare, $600 hotel, $320 per diem, $50 ground transportation)= $25,000.
Civilian personnel training to include: CAD, RMS, crime analysis, administrative training in
grants management, victim advocacy, crime scene investigation, evidence gathering and storage,
and specialized crime lab technology training: 16 staffX $1,562.50 ($592.50 airfare, $600 hotel,
$320 per diem, $50 ground transportation)= $25,000.
Fitness equipment to replace or repair broken equipment: 5 pieces of equipment@ $5,000 +
$5,000 repair/maintenance= $30,000.
Recruiting program for sworn and civilian personnel: event registrations @ 1,069 + information
pamphlet costs (designing and printing) @$4,500 + event handouts (recruiting items such as
pens and resource magnets) @ $4,500 = $10,069.
K.9 Squad veterinary costs and supply costs once general fund budget is depleted: veterinary
costs@$3,500 + supply costs@$1,500 = $5,000.
Purpose Area 1 Subtotal $120.069
Purpose Area 3: Prevention and Education Programs
Salt Lake Peer Court (personnel costs, supplies): 1 X $15,000 == $15,000.
Purpose Area 3 Subtotal $15.000
Purpose Area 6: Planning, Evaluation & Technology
Surveillance cameras project: purchase five surveillance cameras to record evidence and deter
crim.inal activity in the high crime areas of Pioneer Park and the Salt Lake City homeless shelter.
Total cost for project: $7,000 per camera X 5 cameras (3 for Pioneer Park, 2 for Homeless
Shelter)= $35,000. ·
Taser® on-officer camera system to provide operational value, transparency and evidence:
$3,500 per system X 10 systems= $35,000.
Pu,-pose Area 6 Subtotal $70.000
Salt Lake City Subtotal $205,069
SALT LAKE COUNTY
Purpose Area 1: Law Enforcement Programs
Taser ® X2 second generation for the Protective Services Unit: 15 Tasers® X $1,400::::: $21,000.
Purpose Area 1 Subtotal $21.000
Purpose Area 2: Prosecution and Court Programs
Legal Investigator Overtime for Restitution Team: $33.44/hr. X 230 hrs.= $7,691.20.
Fringe Benefits for Legal Investigator: 1 X $2,308.80 = $2,308.80.
Purpose Area 2 Subtotal $10.000
Purpose Area 4: Corrections and community corrections programs:
Enhance training opportunities to support various program units so as to improve skills and
abilities of the case management, treatment, and support staff. The total cost for this program is
$9,406.
Purpose Area 4 Subtotal $9.406
Purpose Area 5: Drug Treatment and Enforcement Programs
Funding approximately 48% of the personnel costs for one full-time equivalent licensed mental
health professional to staff the Substance Abuse Day Treatment program: $75,000.00 * 48% =
$36,000.
Pu1pose Area 5 Subtotal $36,000
Purpose Area 6: Planning, Evaluation and Technology Improvement Programs
Criminal Justice Services will improve the C-Track Management Information Systems with
adjustments and modifications. These modifications are necessary to improve C-Track
functioning between the courts, Criminal Justice Services, and allied agencies: 125 Hours X $96
per hour= $12,000. · ·
IBM Intel ES-2658 Server to host the software for the VCAP Analysis System for the UPD Real
Time Crime Cen~~: 1 X $8,894 = $8,894 (any additional server cost will be paid by UPD).
Purpose Area 6 Subtotal $20.894
Salt Lake County Subtotal $97,300
TOTAL COMBINED PROJECT COST $302,369
Review Narrative
Governing Body Review:
The governing body received a copy of the application on July 9, 2013.
Public Comment Period:
An abstract of the project with a budget was placed on the Police Department's website
with a link to the website for the City. Citizens have the opportunity to comment from
July 9 - August 31, 2013. In addition, a public hearing will be held, upon receiving the
award, when the funds are amended into the city's budget. At that time, citizens will be
given the opportunity to comment again on the project.
The grant information will be available on the website beginning July 9, 2013 and will
remain on th!' site throughout the first two months of the project.
Memorandum of Understanding:
The MOU has been created between Salt Lake City (the City) and Salt Lake County (the
County) to distribute funds for the 2013 JAG Program. As the County is a disparate area,
with the City being the jurisdiction receiving the bulk of the funds, the City has created
the MOU. The County has received a copy of the MOU and is in the process of
reviewing, signing, and returning the MOU to the City. The following is the process:
• The County receives the MOU from the City
• The County reviews and, if satisfactory; sends it to their Attorney.
• If attorney approves and signs, it is passed to the Mayor for signature.
• If Mayor approves, he signs and sends it to the County Council for approval in a
noticed Council Meeting. ·· · · · · ·
• When all of the previous steps are complete, the MOU is returned to the City for
the same process.
• When all of the previous steps are complete, the MOU is legal and binding.
Salt Lake City Police Department will inform BJA when all steps are completed. We
anticipate that happening prior to the end of September 2013.
County Contract#:. _
Salt Lake City Contract#: _
DA File#: _
MEMORANDUMOFAGREEMENT
BETWEEN
SALT LAKE CITY
AND
SALT LAKE COUNTY
Project No.
2013 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program .
Joint Program of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County
This Memorandum of Agreement is made and entered into by and between Salt Lake
City Corporation and Salt Lake County beginning October 1, 2013 through September
30, 2016.
PURPOSE:
The general purpose of this memorandum of Agreement is to establish an understanding
between the parties concerning project management and disbursement of funds awarded
· to Salt Lake City Corporation (''the City") and Salt Lake County (''the County") through
a joint 2013 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program.
'BACKGROUND:
Through a joint application to the United States Department of Justice ("USDOJ"),
Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, the City and the County have
been awarded a joint award, including $97,300 for the County, for the purpose of
carrying out ordinary Law Enforcement and Justice programs as designated by the
USDOJ. All proposed purchases and activities are outlined within five purpose areas
required by USDOJ. These purpose areas include:
Law Enforcement Programs
Prosecution and Court Programs
Corrections and Community Corrections Programs
Drug Treatment and Enforcement Programs
Planning, Evaluation, and Technology Improvements Programs
The project has been designated by both agencies to purchase law enforcement
equipment and supplies, and enhancing Justice Programs with a substance abuse
therapist's salary.
PROVISIONS:
1. The award of $97,300 will be distributed in the following amounts as agreed to by
the City and the County :
a) The County will receive $21,000 for the purchase of 15 Taser® X2 second
generation units for the Protective Services Unit.
b) The County will receive $7,691.20 for legal investigator overtime in their
Restitution Team.
c) The County will receive $2,308.80 for legal investigator benefits.
d) The County will receive $9,406 to support training for various program
units.
e) The County will receive $36,000 to support a mental health professional for
the Substance Abuse Day Treatment program providing 48% of the total
cost for this position.
f) The County will receive $12,000 to improve technology programs related to
early caseresolution by making adjustments and modifications to the C-
Track information management system.
g) The County will receive $8,894 to purchase the IBM Intel E50265 8 Server
which is required to host VCAP software; any additional server cost will be
paidbyUPD.
2. The County will submit quarterly financial and programmatic reports to the
SLCPD, via email, detailing the expenditure of funds and programmatic narrative.
3. The County will submit invoices for reimbursement of grant expenditures to the
City, via email, as needed. ·
4. The City will reimburse grant expenditures to the County through interagency
transfer within 60 days of receipt of invoice.
5. Each invoice submitted by the County will identify the grant number, employee
compensation and/or equipment/supplies purchased, percentage of the purchase
that has been completed, and total dollars spent to date on the project.
6. The City will accrue all interest from this award as reimbursement for
. management of said award.
7. The County will allow 30 days review period for the governing body, as well as
opportunity to comment by citizens and neighborhood or community
organizations (as required by the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance
Grant Program guidelines) before expenditure of any funds.
8. The County shall not expend any funds until notified by the City that the award
has been accepted by the Salt Lake City Council and the budget has been opened
for funds to be entered.
INDEMNITY CLAUSE: The parties to this Agreement are governmental entities under
the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah,§§ 63G-7-101' et seq., as amended ('"t:he·Act',) ..
Consistent with the terms of the Act, each party shall be liable for their own negligent
acts or omissions, or those of their authorized employees, officers, and agents while
engaged in the performance of the obligations under this Agreement, and neither party
shall have any liability whatsoever for any negligent act or omission of the other party, its
employees, officers, or agents. Neither party waives any defenses or limits of liability
available under the Act and other applicable law. Both parties maintain all privileges,
immunities, and other rights granted by the Act and all other applicablt law. .
SEP ARABD.,ITY CLAUSE: In the event any court, or any other binding legal source
shall declare that any provision of this Agreement is illegal and void, such declaration
shall not affect the legality and enforceability of any other provision hereof, unless
provisions are mutually dependent.
------ - ----~-~------ .. ··-- ------··--·-------- -··--·- ---· --
RENEGOTIATION OR MODIFICATIONS: This Agreement may be amended,
modified, or supplemented only by written amendment, executed by the parties hereto
pursuant to § 11-13-202.5 of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, and attached to the original
copy hereof.
TERMINATION: Unless otherwise stated herein, this Agreement may be terminated
with or without cause, in advance of the specified expiration date, by either party, upon
90 days prior written notice being given the other party. On termination of this
Agreement, all accounts and payments will be processed according to the financial
arrangement set forth herein for approved services rendered to date of termination.
REPRESENTATION REGARDING ETIDCAL STANDARDS: The parties
represent that neither has: (1) provided an illegal gift or payoff to a City or County officer
or employee, or former City or County officer or employee, or to any relative or business
entity of a City or County officer or employee or former City or County officer or
employee; (2) retained any person to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, or brokerage or contingent fee, other than
bona :fide employees of bona fide commercial agencies established for the purpose of
securing business; (3) knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in State
statute, the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter-2.44, Salt Lake City Code or Salt
Lake County Code of Ordinances § 2.07; or ( 4) knowingly influenced, and hereby
promises that it will not knowingly influence, a City or County officer or employee or
former City or County officer or employee to breach any of the ethical standards set forth
in State statute, the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake City ·
Code or Salt Lake County ordinances.
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT REQUIREMENTS: In satisfaction of the
requirements of the lnterlocal Cooperation Act, § § 11-13-101 et seq., and in connection
with this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: (a) this Agreement shall be approved
by each party pursuant to § 11-13-202.5; (b) this Agreement shall be reviewed as to the
proper form and compliance with applicable law by an authorized attorney on behalf of
each party pursuant to § 11-13-202.5; an executed original counterpart shall be filed with
the keeper of records for each party pursuant to §11-13-209;· (d)no separate legal entity is
created by the terms of this Agreement. No real or personal property shall be acquired
jointly by the parties as a result of this Agreement. To the extent that a party acquires,
holds, or disposes of any real or personal property for use in the joint or cooperative
undertaking contemplated by this Agreement, such party shall do so in the same manner
that it deals with other property of such party; and ( e) except as otherwise specifically
provided herein, each party shall be responsible for its own costs of any action taken
pursuant to this Agreement, and for any :financing of such costs.
In WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement to be effective as of
the day and year first above written.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
Government Executive Date
Title
City Recorder
Legal Counsel Date
--·-----~----------- . - ------ --···-·------· - -- - ---
SALT LAKE COUNTY
By: _
Mayor or Designee
STATE OF UTAH )
:ss
County of Salt Lake )
On this day of , 2012, personally appeared before me
-----------' who being duly sworn, did say thats/he is the
---------- of Salt Lake County, Office of Mayor, and that the
foregoing instrument ~as signed on behalf of Salt Lake County, by authority of law.
NOTARY PUBLIC, Residing in Salt Lake
County, State of Utah
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: _
Salt Lake County Deputy District Attorney
Date signed:------
2013 Justice Assistance Grant Program
Public Comment
The 2013 Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Application Process has been announced. As a
requirement of the grant, we must make our application intent available to our residents. This
information packet will serve to inform Salt Lake City residents of the Police Department's
intent to apply for this grant, and how the Police Department intends to spend these funds.
Salt Lake City qualifies to apply for$ 302,369 in the 2013 JAG program. Of that total, Salt Lake
City will receive $205,069 and Salt Lake County will receive $97,300. The Salt Lake City
breakdown of proposed expenditures is as follows:
Salt Lake City
$50,000 to provide training for both sworn and civilian personnel in their areas of
expertise to maintain an optimal level of training
$25,000 for directed Community Policing Overtime to focus on problem areas as they
arise
$15,000 contract with the Salt Lake City Peer Court program to enhance efforts in
preventing and deterring juvenile crime ·
. $30,000 to purchase and repair/maintain fitness equipment
$10,069 for department personnel recruiting
$5,000 to support K9 Squad with veterinary bills and supplies that exceed general fund
budget
$35,000 to purchase surveillance-cameras for use in the Pioneer Park and homeless
shelter areas of Salt Lake City
$35,000 to purchase on-body officer surveillance camera systems
The grant has seven purpose areas under which all expenses must fall The Salt Lake City
expenses fall within Law Enforcement Programs, Prevention and Education, and Technology
Improvement This grant application will be submitted on July 9, 2013, and the funding is
scheduled to be awarded with a start date of October 1, 2013.
Comments by the public will be accepted from July 9 through August 31, 2013.
---------------- -·--- -,------------------····--- ------------ .. ---~----· ---------------------- ---------------------
If you have questions about the grant or the proposed budget, feel free to contact Jordan Smith,
Grants Coordinator, or Chief Burbank's office.
Thank yoµ.
Jordan Smitn
grants Coortlinator
Saft £.ais (:i.ty q>o6a {J)epartment
{801) 799-3357
jortfan.smitli.@sfcgov.com
------ --- -------------- - -------
Cnris (Jjur6an{
Cfiiej of <Po6ce
Salt £aiJ (:i.ty q>ofice (J)epartment
(801} 799-3802
cliris. 6ur6ani@sli:gov.com
Grant Application Submission Notification Memo
TO: Jennifer Bruno, Gina Chamness, Sherrie Collins, Dave Everitt, Cindy Gust-Jenson, Karen Halladay, Sylvia
Richards, Lehua Weaver
FROM: Jordan Smith
DATE: July 9, 2013
SUBJECT: Salt Lake Area JAG
FUNDING AGENCY:
GRANT PROGRAM:
REQUESTED AMOUNT:
DEPARTMENT APPLYING:
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance
Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program Local Solicitation
$302,369
Police Department
COLLABORATING AGENCIES: Salt Lake County
DATE SUBMITTED:
SPECIFICS:
• Technical Assistance (Training)
D Provides FTE Position(s)
D Existing D New
July 9, 2013
• Equipment/Supplies Only
• Overtime D Requires Funding After Grant
Match Required I 00% 0In-Kind D
D • D
Computer Software Development
Contractual Services
New Program (City not performing function now)
D In House D Contract Services
GRANT DETAILS:
The Salt Lake City area has been determined a disparate region. Salt Lake City receives the majority of the funds in the County, and
has been determined to be the agency to submit the application. Salt Lake City qualifies to apply for $302,369. Of that total, Salt Lake City will receive
$205.069 and Salt Lake County will receive $97,300. The Salt Lake City portion will support the following:
$50,000 to provide training for both sworn and civilian personnel in their areas of expertise to maintain an optimal level of
training
$25,000 for directed Community Policing Overtime to focus on problem areas as they arise
$15,000 contract with the Salt Lake City Peer Court program to enhance efforts in preventing and deterring juvenile crime
$30,000 to purchase and repair/maintain fitness equipment
$10,069 for department personnel recruiting
$5,000 to support K9 Squad with veterinary bills and supplies that exceed general fund budget
$35,000 for surveillance cameras in the Pioneer Park and homeless shelter areas
$35,000 to purchase on-officer surveillance camera systems
cc: Sarah Behrens, Elizabeth Myers, Gordon Hoskins, Krista Dunn
ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE SPONSHORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES
September 22-26, 2013
KEYNOTE LUNCHEON SPONSOR ($10,000)
• Acknowledgement and Signage at the Luncheon
• Invitation for Ten Guests to Attend Luncheon and Two Conference Admissions
• Half Page Advertisement I Acknowledgement in Conference Program
• Recognition on Signage at Conference and in All Related Press Releases
OPENING OR SANKOFA RECEPTION SPONSORS ($5000)
• Acknowledgement and Signage at Reception
• Invitation for up to Ten Guests to Attend Reception
• Half Page Ad in Printed Conference Program
• Recognition on Signage at Conference and in All Related Press Releases
CHAMPION OF CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT ($5000 OR MORE)
• Acknowledgement at the Conference Opening Reception
• Invitation for Ten Guests to Attend Opening Reception or Luncheon
• Half Page Advertisement I Acknowledgement in Conference Program
• Recognition on Signage at Conference and in All Related Press Releases
PATRON ($3000 -$4999)
• Acknowledgement at the Conference Opening Reception
• Invitation for Five Guests to Attend Opening Reception or Luncheon
• Half Page Advertisement I Acknowledgement in Conference Program
• Recognition on Signage at Conference and in All Related Press Releases
SUPPORTER ($1000-2999)
• Acknowledgement at the Conference Opening Reception
• Invitation for Supporter and One Guest to Attend Opening Reception or Luncheon
• Quarter Page Advertisement I Acknowledgement in Conference Program
THUMB DRIVE SPONSOR ($3000)
• The agency/company logo to appear on all thumb drives
• Invitation for Three Guests to Attend Opening Reception or Luncheon
• Half Page Advertisement I Acknowledgement in Conference Program
CONFERENCE BAG SPONSOR ($2000)
• The agency/company logo would appear on all conference bags
• Acknowledgement in Conference Program
FRIEND OF CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT ($100-999)
• Acknowledgement at the Conference Opening Reception
• Invitation for Friend and One Guest to attend Opening Reception
• Acknowledgement in Conference Program
PROGRAM ADVERTISEMENT
• $500 I half page, $250 / quarter page, $100 business card size
P.O. Box 1737 + Indianapolis, Indiana 46206 + (866)-4NACOLE
E-mail: nacole@NACOLE.org + Web site: www.nacole.org
NV 5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
May 23, 2013
Salt Lake City Corporation
Attn: JOHN J. NASER, P.E.
349 South 200 East, Suite 600
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114
Re: City Wide Public Way Concrete Study
Dear Mr. Naser,
NV5 appreciates the opportunity to present our proposal to help the City find solutions to address
the city's concrete infrastructure maintenance, repair and replacement needs, including funding
strategies.
NV5 has prepared pavement and asset management plans for a number of municipalities and
other entities including the City of Santa Clara, CA; Pittsburg, CA; Martinez, CA; Lorma Linda,
CA; Novato, CA; Madera County, CA; Midvale City, UT; the City of South Salt Lake, UT;
Davis County School District, UT and Tooele School District, UT. We also have a major role in
the concrete replacement program for the City of Colorado Springs, CO. NV5 staff has been
under contract for over seven years assuming full management of all asphalt and concrete for the
City (see attached). From this and other experience, we understand that investing in ongoing
maintenance can help defer the cost of reconstruction, and provide reasonable and safe passage
for its citizens.
Concrete infrastructure encompasses a substantial investment by the City. The proper
maintenance of this asset will provide dividends in numerous areas, including pedestrian safety,
conformance with ADA requirements and functional infrastructure ( control of storm water and
pavement preservation) based on reasonable maintenance and replacement programs.
Using a benchmarking process, NV5 will review the current system of repair/replace/funding
utilized by Salt Lake City. We will compare Salt Lake City's system with a broad range of other
city's approaches to concrete repair and funding strategies. We will utilize our network of
relationships with other municipalities to access and review what cities of similar size and make
up are doing successfully and have tried (but perhaps not continued with) in order to provide a
comprehensive evaluation of strategies and funding options for use by the City. NV5 proposes
the following scope and fee:
Task 1 - Review the existing City concrete program
It is important at the onset of any project to understand the work that has already been
accomplished. NV5 realizes that City staff has already assembled data and created documents
relevant to this scope of work. NV 5 will work closely with City staff (Engineering and Public
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3::)() MURRAY, UT 84107 WWW NV5 C0'1 OFFICE" EOI. 743. 1300 FAX 801 743 0300
)< J ~ C )\ ,,,
NV5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Services) to assemble and peer review the previously compiled information in order to identify
any gaps or additional data that may be required.
NV5 will review the current system including the installation of needed concrete infrastructure in
areas where none exists, review existing inventory and maintenance strategies for existing
concrete infrastructure, and the upgrade of infrastructure to comply with changing legislation
(ADA requirements). The infrastructure included for this scope of work consists primarily of
public sidewalk, curb and gutter, stairs, walls, ADA ramps, and driveway approaches.
NV5 will also review the City ordinance (Title 14) and policies for the current public way
concrete program. NV5 will summarize the current program administration and construction
practices. NV5 will work closely with staff to summarize current political, legal and financial
considerations that are driving the current City practices and funding options.
This task assumes two meetings with staff to understand the current inventory, maintenance
program and funding sources.
Task 1 - $5,700.00
Task 2 - Identify other similar Municipal Programs
Task 2a - NV5 will conduct a very broad evaluation of other cities regarding their approach to
addressing public way concrete repair and funding strategies. We will identify multiple cities from
across the country to create a pool of 25 representative cities for an initial screening phone
interview to ensure we capture a wide spectrum of strategies for the maintenance/replacement
and funding for concrete in the public way. NV5 will conduct one two hour meeting with staff to
review the findings of the initial screening. During this meeting, NV5 and City staff will select
ten cities for more detailed comparison.
Task 2a - $3,750.00
Task 2b - We will review the ordinances and policies and conduct a second more in depth phone
interview with staff from the ten selected cities to understand how their current system for
maintaining concrete infrastructure functions including: inventory, maintenance of concrete,
administration and construction practices, codes, advantages or gaps in their current system, how
they communicate with citizens, and funding strategies to pay for maintenance and replacement
of this infrastructure. Many municipalities simply maintain concrete as part of their roadway
infrastructure and pay for it with similar funds. However this infrastructure is closely related to
the drainage system and this raises the possibility of other funding vehicles.
Task 2b - $10,000.00
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET, STE 3:)() MURRAY, UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM Of"FICf: EOI 743 1300 F"AX 801 743 0300
1,,.,.. 111 ;-\, 1',1 if-'/,I 11 '" 'I,-.,:, 'll
NV5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Task 3 - Identify and Evaluate Funding Sources and Strategies
NV5 will summarize the funding sources currently used by the City including Community
Development Block Grants, General Funds, Class C funds, the State's Safe Sidewalk Program,
Private improvements and Property owner shared improvements (City 50/50 program). NV5
with staff will identify potential alternative funding sources based on the funding strategies used
by other municipalities identified in Task 2 specifically for the repair and replacement ( outside of
CIP funds) of concrete assets and make specific recommendations about any other funding
sources or strategies that might be viable for the City. We will provide summary data on all
funding strategies and partnering opportunities found being utilized by the ten cities from Task 2.
Since concrete curb and gutter provide roadway benefits including controlling storm water and
pavement preservation, funding sources associated with these benefits will be identified where
they exist. This task includes two meetings with staff to discuss funding sources and strategies.
Task 3 - $5,100.00
Task 4 - Best Practices and Stakeholder Input/Recommendations
NV 5 will identify and evaluate any new or alternative products, materials, or evaluation
techniques and construction practices based on the information gathered in Task 2 and from
readily available market data.
NV5 will solicit comments and concerns from City Departments and stake holders and identify
options for addressing each. This will include one meeting with City staff and one public
meeting to gather community concerns.
NV5 will prepare a report to document the findings of the previous tasks for use by staff, the
administration and City Council. We will summarize the data into easily understandable tables
to facilitate comparison of the City's current practices including ordinances, policies,
administrative approach, inventory, maintenance, repair, replacement, and construction practices
and funding with those of the ten interviewed cities. We will also identify, evaluate, and make
recommendations for potential funding sources and strategies. The recommendations will
include a cost comparison between the City's program (including the 50/50 program) and the
other municipalities. The report will identify staff and stake holder concerns and options for
addressing those concerns including recommendations for ordinance or policy changes if
warranted. The report will identify and evaluate any alternative products or new techniques and
include recommendations and alternatives to improve the City's current public way concrete
program.
Task 4 - $13,300.00
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3:)() MURRAY, UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM OFFICE EOI. 743 1300 FAX 801 743 0300
'l1 f-'AI '", ,. ,, f',
NV5
BEYOND ENGINEERING
Task 5 - Present findings to City Council
NV5 will summarize and present the findings of this effort to the City Council. We anticipate
this effort to include creating presentation graphics and tables, summarizing the effort in a short
report, and presenting this summary to the council.
Task 5 - $1,600.00
Schedule: NV5 anticipates that the entire process can be completed in approximately three
months which will allow a reasonable time to review the existing City program, gather data and
interview other municipalities and to solicit staff and stakeholder input.
Task 1 - Review the existing City concrete program
Task 2 - Identify other similar Municipal Programs
Task 2a
Task2b
Task 3 - Identify and Evaluate Funding Sources and Strategies
Task 4 - Best Practices and Stakeholder Input/Recommendations
Task 5 - Present findings to City Council
$5,700.00
$3,750.00
$10,000.00
$5,100.00
$13,300.00
$1,600.00
Total $39,450.00
The NV5 Team is committed to finding the most appropriate design solutions for this project and
we are eager to exceed your expectations of what a civil engineering company can do.
Sincerely,
NOLTE ASSOCIATES, INC.
(a subsidiary of Nolte Vertical Five)
Curt McCuistion, PE, LEED-AP, CMQ/OE
Office Director/ Associate
Authorized Signature Date
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3:x> MURRAY, UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM OFFICE EOI. 743 1300 FAX 801 743 0300
A l~lFl.:;<~\';~"l'·/' ft•"-'~ '-J!-f.R.~,,
NV S
BEYOND ENGINEERING
City of Colorado Springs
NV5 is managing the resurfacing program, the concrete replacement program associated with the street
overlay work, and the alley program. The resurfacing program is estimated at $6.4 million annually, the
concrete program is approximately $5.5 million (including 42 miles of sidewalks, 80 miles of curbs and
gutters, 695 crosspans and, 3,059 pedestrian ramps), and the alley program is approximately $750
thousand over the next five years for an annual budget of about $12.65 million annually.
The resurfacing projects include up to 80 miles of roadway maintenance in the form of slurry seal, chip
seal, and overlay improvements. The concrete program involves replacement of curb/gutter/sidewalk and
cross pans for the overlay programs of the Street Division and the PPRT A. The Alley program improves
approximately 35 of the over 1253 alleys in Colorado Springs.
NV5 developed the project delivery management system to help monitor the work, develop the
specifications for the work, provide necessary documentation of work being performed, and financial
information. Other services included:
• Preparation of Request for Funds support documents for presentation to the PPRT A Board for
project funding.
• Reviewing Pavement Management Analysis results for the PPRTA and Street Division Program
• Creating contract documents for resurfacing work, the concrete program, and the alley program
for the PPRT A and the outside contractor portion of the Street Division annual program.
Managing the projects from bidding thru completion of the work.
• Coordination of the contract work with City Agencies and other agencies impacted by the work.
Inspecting projects thru completion including traffic control and material testing.
• Providing Public Relations required during the program including advising the emergency
services providers of the work, the Transit personnel of areas affecting their bus routes, the
neighborhoods affected by the work and handle any phone calls from interested parties.
• Preparing weekly reports to the Street Division and monthly reports to the PPRTA Board
including the project financials.
We assisted them in the creation of their concrete repair/replacement program including the criteria
describing the level or priority of need based on specific examples available to the public via the city
website. Examples are:
Priority 1 Priority 3
5217 SOUTH STATE STREET. STE 3:)() MURRAY. UT 84107 WWW NV5 COM OFFICE EOI. 743 1300 F"AX 80! 743 0300
,\
City Council Announcements
August 20, 2013
For Your Information 6:07:39 PM
A. New Project Management Implementation
Council staff is working with IMS to implement a new project management program.
With the guidance of the Chair and Vice Chair, staff has been exploring options for
formal project management software in order to help focus staff resources and support
staffs efforts to accomplish Council priorities and projects. The software program and
methodology will help staff to better track the list of pending projects, assign staff time,
identify all work group contributors to projects, and to report on the progress in a shared
or online program. Over the coming weeks, IMS staff will help to guide us through
options and pursue next steps, with the timeline of having a new system implemented by
the end of the year. Other pieces of information:
• We are pursuing "agile" method to project management, which is an option
to the "waterfall" method. Waterfall has been more common. The Microsoft
Project program uses a 'waterfall' method.
• There are a number of different software programs available for agile PM, as
well as variations in the methodology or how the tools are implemented.
• IMS hired a new staff person to serve as a Projects and Business Team
Manager, who will be helping us with exploring those options and proposing
software options.
• Depending on the progress and assistance needed, there may be a time when
the staff hires a project manager consultant to help train the staff.
• IMS or Council staff are available to meet with Council Members to discuss
the process, and/or receive feedback on how project management is handled
within the office. Cindy. Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director, said staff
had been working on a project management approach within the office
which would require some software. She said this had been raised
previously with the Council and she just wanted to keep bringing it to the
Council's attention so they knew what was being worked on. She said staff
thought it would help identify "blocks of time" ( discussed at Council Retreat)
where staff could really focus on Council priorities so the Council could be a
more pro-active body rather then re-active. She said staff would come back
to the Council probably in November with some pretty significant progress.
She said staff would keep the Council informed along the way in case the
Council wanted to slow down or go in a different direction.
B. Feedback Needed on the Homeless Employment program
The Administration has provided the following information and is requesting the
Council's feedback -
As part of FY 2012-13's budget amendment #4 in June, the Council appropriated
$80,000 for a Homeless Employment program. Subsequently, the Administration has
had conversations with the Downtown Alliance about possible uses for this funding. As
this funding request was Council initiated, we want to ensure we are meeting the
Council's intent prior to committing the funds.
The Downtown Alliance, working with Valley Services and many downtown businesses,
proposes to employ the homeless to pick up trash in a 10 block area ranging from 200 S.
to 500 S, from Rio Grande to the Intermodal Hub. The Downtown Alliance is currently
working to secure donations from local businesses to provide funds for this service and
according to the Alliance, this endeavor has been very successful. Our discussions with
the Downtown Alliance have produced a number of options.
Option 1: 10 Block Area Program. This option would cover the area originally discussed
by the Downtown Alliance and Valley Services. This option would provide funding for
trash containers but not for recycling containers. These cans would be provided by the
City, and trash would be picked up by Valley Services. This option would provide some
City funds to supplement the fundraising for this program that is already being done by
The Downtown Alliance and Valley Services.
$26,000
$54,000
Trash can purchase by the City
One time funding for Homeless Employment Program,
funding provided directly to Valley Services.
Option 2: Expanded Block Area Program. This option would extend the coverage area
from the initial 10 block area to cover an additional 7 blocks ist S. to 5th S. and 6th
West to rail lines/ 7th W. This option would provide funding for trash containers but
not for recycling containers. These cans would be provided by the City, and trash would
be picked up by Valley Services. This option would provide some one-time City funds to
supplement the fundraising for this program that is already being done by the
Downtown Alliance and Valley Services.
$44,200
$35,200
Trash can purchase by the City
One time funding for Homeless Employment Program, funding
provided directly to Valley Services.
Option 3: Expanding Block Area Program + Recycling. This option would extend the
coverage area from the initial 10 block area to cover an additional 7 blocks, and would
provide funding for trash containers and recycling containers. The cans would be
provide by the City, and trash and recycling would be picked up by Valley Services. This
option would provide funding only for trash and recycling containers.
$80,000 Trash and recycling can purchase by the City.
Ms. Gust-Jenson said there was a bit of a twist to this and staff needed feedback from the
Council to ensure this was going in the direction Council Members wanted. She asked
the Council to read the information and get comments back to staff. She said one core
question was whether Council Members were ok with having some trash cans purchased
by the City. She said there was also the issue for expanding the block area program.
Councilmember Simonsen said he understood Option 3 was for both trash and recycling
cans. Councilmember Christensen said he wanted to keep the labor portion in place and
if there was an absence of trash containers he thought that was a place where the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) could have a positive effect. Councilmember Penfold said
the Council could look at Option 1 and then approach the RDA about supplying trash
cans for the additional space. Council member Simonsen suggested staying with what
was originally approved and then look at what we could come up with maybe from RDA
sources to expand the area and add recycling containers.
Additional
City Council Announcements
August 20, 2013
Information Needed by Staff
c. Blade Signs (Attached) View Attachments
Council Member Soren Simonsen would like to initiate changes to the City's zoning regulations
for the following types of signs.
1. In the Commercial Sugar House Business District CSHBD 1 & 2 zones, allow one blade
or projecting building sign per business at street level rather than one per street
frontage.
2. In all commercial zones where A-frame signs are allowed, the dimension of 2 ft. x 3 ft.
should be clarified as the dimension of the sign face itself, and allow for a larger frame
surrounding the sign. At times, City Enforcement has been ticketing some businesses
that have these standard sized signs, where the frame extends a few inches beyond the
edge of the sign. For example, the following A-frame sign structures are produced by
the same company. The frame size is slightly larger than what is currently allowed.
The sign face size varies just slightly and would comply with the current zoning
standards.
Business
• Washington Square Cafe
27in.wide
• Ken Garff Auto Sales
27in.wide
• City Council A-frame signs
27in.wide
3. Legalize "vintage" moving and lighted signs in the Sugar House Business District and
address allowing new signs that are similar in form and function.
sign face
35 in. length x 24.5" wide
sign frame
46 in. length x
36 in. length x 24 in. wide 46 in. length x
36 in. length x 24 in. wide 46 in. length x
Constituents have pointed out that the City's regulations for A-frame signs and blade or
projecting signs in the Sugar House Business District or other commercial areas do not
currently allow for maximum flexibility. In addition, vintage signs, such as the Granite
Furniture sign, the old Dee Burger Clown sign or the rotating Harmon's Kentucky Fried Chicken
bucket are not addressed in the zoning regulations.
Proposed changes to address these types of signs could be simple fixes. Council staff prepared
the attached ordinances for the first two items. This would ease processing the proposed
changes by the Administration. The 3rd component, vintage signs, will take more time and
outreach before language can be drafted.
• Would other Council Members support Council Member Sorensen's desire to
initiate the proposed zoning regulations relating to A-frame signs, blade or
projecting signs and vintage signs? Council Members Love and Luke said they
would support the proposal. Ms. Gust-Jenson said these issues were previously
discussed by the Council and Councilmember Simonsen had requested that
legal prepare ordinances. Councilmember Simonsen said Neil Lindberg,
Council Legal Director, had already drafted ordinances for the first two items.
He said he wanted to work with Mr. Lindberg to draft the "vintage sign"
ordinance and then present that to the Administration along with pursuing
some community outreach.
D. SixtyNineSeventy Project (Attached)
• Is the Council interested in having staff work on nominating the
SixtyNineSeventy Project for the Utah American Planning Association Awards?
Yes. Councilmember LaMalfa said he encouraged staff to reach out to
SixtyNineSeventy to have them write their own application and then we would
submit it. He said it would probably be better if this came from the RDA and DJ
Baxter, RDA Director said he would get back to him.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REGARDING THE HORSE DRAWN CARRIAGE INCIDENT:
Councilmember Luke said he wanted to formally request that staff continue to work with
the horse carriage business operator /veterinarian to get more information and also to
have staff look at best practices around the country to see what other municipalities had
done in terms of regulating the horse carriage industry in an urban environment. He
said he wanted to gather all the facts/information possible and then determine a course
of action. Council Members Garrott and Simonsen said they would support the proposal.
Councilmember Simonsen suggested having appropriate City boards participate such as
the Business and Transportation Advisory Boards and also County Animal Control.
M 13-S
City Council Announcements
August 27, 2013
Information needed by Staff
A. Constable Services in the City
Council Member Love is interested in reviewing constable services in the City. She would
like to advance an ordinance that would give the City flexibility of appointing a City
Constable if desired.
• Is the Council supportive of an ordinance giving the City the option of appointing
a constable? Council Members were in favor of moving ahead with this
item.
B. Proposed change to the term of the Council Chairperson
Council Member Garrott has proposed that the Council discuss allowing the option for a Council
Member to serve Chairperson for two consecutive years. The Council practice relating to the
Chairperson and Vice Chairperson are outlined within Council Policy, and would not be affected
by State or City Codes.
The proposal includes continuing to hold annual elections, as before, but the current serving
Chairperson would be eligible for re-election in order to serve for an additional year, not to
exceed two consecutive years. Below are amendments to the Council Policy for the Council's
discussion.
Council Member Garrott provides the following points in support of the change:
Increasing the council's efficacy. Continuity in leadership is one of the ways that the
council's priorities can be advanced, in part by lowering transaction costs with the
Administration and our other partners. New priorities and process each year with a new
council chair sometimes increases these costs.
While not all leadership will be rewarded with a second year, a second possible year of
leadership is a significant accountability mechanism to other council members. I don't think
this new rule would abet dominance by a narrow 4-vote block, a concern that may have
motivated the original "no consecutive term" rule.
Please note: Amendments to section 'd' below relate to the changes that the Council discussed
during the Chair elections this past January: Council Members declaring their candidacy, taking
up to two minutes to explain their interests or goals for a Chair term, and that for the purpose of
record-keeping, the Executive Director would read the name of the Council Member along with
their vote when tallying the ballots.
Council Members said the current policy was working well but were in favor of
moving this along to a future agenda item.
Council Policy Amendments:
A.7 ELECTION OF THE CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON (~08/13)
. .
!!.,_The Salt Lake City Council shall select one of its Members as Chairperson, on
an annual basis, to sign documents, represent the position of the Council to the
media and the administration, and oversee the management of the Office of the
City Council including monitoring and guiding the Council priorities, and
assistance in staff work load evaluation, pursuant to Rule 1 of the Salt Lake City
Council Rules of Procedure. The Salt Lake City Council will also select one of its
Members as Vice Chairperson, on an annual basis, to act as backup to the Chairperson in the
event that the Chairperson is unavailable for any reason.
b. Elections: Elections will be held on an annual basis, including for a Council Member wishing to
serve a second consecutive year as Chairperson.
a.c. Term & Eligibility: The term for the Chairperson shall be limited to two consecutive years. If the
current Chairperson wishes to serve for a second consecutive year, the Council Member would
follow the steps below for declaration of candidacy. Council Members who have served for two
consecutive years may serve as Chairperson following another Council Member's term. (Council
Members may serve more than once as Chairperson, as long as the term does not exceed two
consecutive years.) All Members are eligible to serve as the Council Vice Chairperson.
d. Declaration of Candidacy and Voting Procedure:
1. At the first Work Session in January each year, the Council Members shall elect one Member
as Chairperson and one Member as Vice Chairperson.
i) During the Work Session, Council Members interested in serving as Chairperson or Vice
Chairperson shall declare their candidacy.
&.ill__If necessary, following the declaration Council Member(s) may take no more than
two minutes to explain their interest in serving as Chairperson.
2. The election shall be by written ballot, with votes announeed by the Executive Director
announcing each Council Member's name and their vote for the record. ~
1-;3..,_Separate ballots shall be held for Chairperson and Vice Chairperson positions.
2-;-4-Election shall require a majority of four votes.
5. This action shall be ratified at the first formal Council meeting in January.
lr.~ The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall serve from the date the action is ratified until the
ratification of new officers occurs in the following year.
e-;t_The Chairperson from the calendar year prior to the Work Session vote will conduct at the
Induction Ceremony and any other official Council meetings until the vote is ratified for the
incoming Chair. If the prior year's Chairperson is scheduled to leave office at the end of the
calendar year in which he or she is serving as Chairperson, or is not available for any reason, the
Vice Chairperson will conduct all official Council meetings. If the prior year's Vice Chairperson is
scheduled to leave office at the end of the calendar year in which he or she is serving as Vice
Chairperson, or is not available for any reason, all official Council meetings will be conducted by
the continuing Council Member who has the greatest seniority of the Council. If more than one
Council Member has an identical amount of seniority, those Council Members will flip a coin to
determine who will conduct at official Council meetings until the votes for incoming Chairperson
and Vice Chairperson can be ratified.
fr.g_Jn the event of a vacancy in the position of Chairperson, the Vice Chairperson shall become
Chairperson and shall serve the remainder of the term. A vacancy in the position of Vice
Chairperson shall be filled by election in the manner prescribed in this rule.
ech. Eligibility: All Couneil Members who vr.ill be in offiee during the subjeet year shall be eligible to
seFVe as the Couneil Chairperson, 1nrith the exeeption of the Member who is sef\1:ng as Council
Chairperson at the time of eleetion. A:ll Mem@el'B a.Pe eligiale t8 seP¥e a:s the C8ttl'leil Viee
***
Additional
City Council Announcements
August 27, 2013
For Your Information
A. Sugar House Circulation & Streetscape Amenities Plan
As part of the Council's consideration of the Sugar House Circulation & Streetscape Amenities
Plan, it has been proposed that the Council hold the Public Hearing for the item on-site at the
Sugar House Monument on Friday, September 27 in the evening. To accommodate the event,
the right-hand turn lane would also be closed during the hearing. This effort would include early
notification through a mailing and other means, additional information tables available during
the hearing, opportunities for the public to leave comments and/or participate in the hearing.
This would be with the full Council, if the schedule works for all, and would be the official
hearing for this topic. More details can be worked out if the Council approves of this plan.
Discussed during August 27th Work Session under Item A-4,
B. Hardware Equipment Needed for Attorney's Office E-
Discovery
Council Members may recall approving an item in the Attorney's Office budget for the software
and licensing for their e-discovery program. The related hardware was missed during the budget
development and is needed as soon as possible for the Attorney's Office to meet obligations. The
cost is $40,000 and would be included in the first budget amendment, which should be received
in approximately the next month. The Administration is requesting the Council's preliminary
approval to spend the funds for hardware purchases. Council Members were in favor of
preliminary approval to spend the funds for hardware purchases.
City Council Announcements
September, 3, 2013
6:10:26 PM Information needed by Staff View Attachments
A. Replacing Carlton on COG
For several years, Council Member Carlton Christensen has served on the Council of
Governments as a representative of the Council. How would the Council like to fill this slot? Two
options may be to either have another Council Member temporarily participate through the
beginning of next year until the representation can be discussed with the new Council Members,
or perhaps a Council Member who will be continuing in office is interested in serving for the
foreseeable future. Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director, said Councilmember
Christensen indicated he wanted to have someone replace him prior to the end of his Council
term. She said the Council may want to look at a replacement as soon as October. Discussion
was held about various aspects of the position. Council Members Simonsen, LaMalfa and Love
said they were willing to fill-in temporarily. Councilmember LaMalfa said the issue would be put
on the next agenda to select a person to serve.
B. Preliminary approval of a budget item for N eighborworks
Lighting of their mural under 300 North.
Council Members may recall a Neighborworks project to paint art murals under the 300 North
I-15 overpass. The project has been done for some time, but there has been an issue with the
street lights in the area to provide adequate light and prevent graffiti and other activity that
could detract from the mural. Unfortunately, there has been some back and forth regarding the
conditions of the street lights, stolen wire, connection to UDOT's system or the City's, etc.
Engineering has reached a solution, but does not have the funds available to complete the work.
In the last few weeks, Council Member Penfold has been working with Neighborworks to resolve
the funding issue. Approximately $20,000 is needed to replace stolen wire and add a few lights
for increased security. The City's contractor would perform the work (bid was already
received). The project could be funded out of the City's Street Light Fund. This item is on
announcements for preliminary approval from the Council so that the contractor, who has been
working on the other street lighting repairs, can begin work as soon as possible. The formal
approval would be included in a future budget amendment. (It was thought at one time that the
project could be funded from CIP, but that might set an unintended precedent since it is a street
lighting project.) Ms. Gust-.Jenson said a preliminary nod was needed from the Council to allow
work to begin and then the issue would come back for formal action in a budget opening. A
straw poll was taken for preliminary approval. All Council Members were in favor.
C. Legislative Action for CN Rezone This item was not discussed.
Council Member Jill Love would like to initiate a Legislative Action to consider a zoning map
amendment for a small city-owned parcel at 1226 South 1100 East, from R-1-5000, Single
Family Residential to CN-Neighborhood Commercial.
Currently, the parcel is vacant and being used for parking by some of the area's businesses.
Surrounding land uses include small, locally-owned businesses to the south and east including
Liberty Heights Fresh and the Kyoto and Finca Restaurants zoned CN. Single-family residential
uses are located to the north, east and west. A portion of the McClelland Trail is located
northwest and abutting this property.
City staff and the property owner to the south (1234 South) are in preliminary discussions
regarding development of both properties for a small commercial business(es) that includes
extending and improving the McClellan Trail along the north side of the property and along
1100 East to tie in with the Liberty Heights Fresh development. (Purchase or use of the City's
property has been part of this discussion.)
Driveway access for the adjacent parcel goes through the city's property. In order for the
proposed project currently being discussed with the City to take place, the city's parcel needs to
be rezoned to a commercial zone. The CN zone is being proposed because the property at 1226
South is zoned CN. Both properties have historically been used for parking.
The intent would be to implement the Council's priorities to improve compatibility between
residential and commercial uses so that each can be strengthened, support development of
successful neighborhood business nodes, encourage development and growth oflocally-owned
business, and expand the City's urban trail system.
>-" Would other Council Members support the proposed rezone?
City Council Announcements
November 12, 2013
Information needed by Staff 9:03:49 PM
A. Fire Department Four-Handed Staffing - Proposed Resolution
Council Member Simonsen is advancing for Council review, at the request of the Fire Union, a
resolution in support of four-handed staffing - four personnel on each fire apparatus that is
designed to be staffed by four people. The Union has previously indicated to Council staff that
they prefer to retain the flexibility of absences of up to 12 hours to allow for administrative
meetings, training and personal leave needs. Discussion was held on adopting an ordinance
versus a resolution, benefits of having four-handed staffing, and potential budgetary impacts.
Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director, said a draft resolution had been prepared and
staff needed to know if the Council was interested in having this placed on an agenda before the
end of the year. A majority of the Council was opposed to moving forward with the resolution.
B. Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee {CCAC) Replacement
This announcement has been in front of the Council previously. Would the Council like to
move forward on re-appointing Ms. Spyropoulos-Linardakis? Also there is one more seat the
Council needs to fill. Charlie would like to recommend Dale Cox. Staff has requested Mr.
Cox's resume and will forward onto Council once we receive it. Ms. Gust-Jenson said one
Councilmember requested additional information about the committee and how it related to
both union and non-union employees. She said staff would come back to the Council with
additional information before raising the membership question.
C. Quarterly Leadership Council/School Board Meetings
Quarterly Council/School Board leadership meeting is scheduled for Friday, November 22
from noon to 1:30 pm hosted by the Council Office. Please provide agenda items to Council
staff. Council staff has listed two items for the agenda: 1) Council's education priority: "civic
readiness" and interest to institutionalize civic readiness" and 2) upcoming legislative issues.
Ms. Gust- Jenson invited Council Members to provide potential agenda discussion items. She
said in keeping with the Council's education priority, one agenda item was to discuss the civic
readiness concept. She said staff put together a summary of different suggestions people had
in terms of civic readiness. She said Councilmember Garrott provided a re-write which did
not change the meaning or anything like that but just made it flow.
Councilmember LaMalfa said he felt the proposed language was too broad and suggested a
narrower interpretation of civic readiness. Discussion was held on various aspects of the
issue. Ms. Gust-Jenson said staff could use Councilmember Garrott's format and try to come
back with something along Councilmember LaMalfa's description. Councilmember Love
suggested having Council Members LaMalfa and Garrott work together to refine the
language.
Council staff would like to request for a clear definition of "civic readiness." As a result of the
Council's most recent discussion regarding the education priority, Council staff has taken
phrases from your discussion to develop this DRAFT definition:
Original Text: Civic Readiness: A civically-engaged community consists of individuals
or groups who interact, participate in, and understand the decision-making process of local
government and other institutions. A civically-engaged community is equipped with the
fundamental tools to help develop sustainable community values through partnerships
while promoting tolerance and respect of others as they advance the interests and welfare
of the community as a whole.
Councilmember Garrott's suggestion: Civic readiness prepares citizens for an
understanding of, interaction with, and participation in local public life. Salt Lake City's goal
of a civically-engaged community includes citizens with the tools to: -develop sustainable
community values (through partnerships?) -promote tolerance and respect for others-
advance the interests and welfare of the community as a whole.
Councilmember Penfold suggested adding a discussion item about how to ensure that
programs intended to reach youth, actually did reach at-risk youth since there seemed to be
some disconnect between the School Board and some of the organizations that might
approach the Council about how they were identifying high risk youth and how they
planned to involve them in activities. Ms. Gust-Jenson said staff would also include the
Council's earlier discussion about the "Dead Sea Scrolls" exhibit.
Additional
City Council Announcements
November 12th, 2013
For Your Information
A. Utah Transit Authority (UTA}/SLC Council Retreat
UTA Trustees are available to participate in a half-day retreat with the Salt Lake City
Council on Tuesday, November 26, in either the morning or the afternoon. This will be
an opportunity for Council Members to have a discussion with UTA officials on how to
improve service in Salt Lake City.
', What is the best time for Council Members to schedule the half-day retreat with
UTA Trustees on Tuesday, November 26? Councilmember LaMalfa said newly
elected Council Members were invited to attend but would not participate in the
discussion unless other Council Members objected. A majority of the Council was
in favor. Ms. Gust-Jenson asked if the Council wanted to hold the retreat in the
morning with the understanding that Councilmember Christensen might not be
able to attend. She said the function needed to be concluded no later than 1:00
p.m. A majority of the Council was in favor.
City Council Announcements
October 15, 2013
Information needed by Staff 6:20:28 PM
A. Legislative Subcommittee Policy
The City Council on September 3 discussed the make-up of the Council's Legislative Policy
Committee. The Council's current informal policy is that the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Council
and the Chair of the RDA Board of Directors make up the Legislative Policy Committee. Based
upon the Council's direction September 3, the new policy would be:
• The Legislative Subcommittee is made up of the respective City Council and RDA Board
chairs, plus a third Council Member elected by the Council.
• If a subcommittee member defers serving, another Council Member will be appointed
with the advice and consent of the rest of the Council.
• The term of the Legislative Subcommittee runs annually from April through the March
adjournment of the Utah Legislature.
Cindy Gust-Jenson said the administration would like to move forward
with legislative sub-committee meetings within the nextfew weeks.
Councilmember Garrott asked if the committee was empowered to make
policy decisions on behalf of the Council. A discussion was held regarding
what was done in the past, updates and check-ins to the Council during the
legislative sessions, setting a legislative priority list in April or October,
informing constituency about what the Council was working on during the
session.
Council Chair LaMalfa asked to have the balance of the discussion on a
.future work session meeting.
B. Council Policy Manual Revisions - Housekeeping Items
Council staff has prepared a list of potential housekeeping updates that could be made to the
Council Policy Manual before it is distributed to newly-elected Council Members. The
housekeeping items relate to a number of edits to reflect current practice. Future amendments
may be suggested at a later date for more significant changes that the Council may want to
consider.
• Attached is a list of the housekeeping changes proposed.
Councilmember Garrott asked if the changes could be placed on a work session
agenda. Council Chair LaMalfa said any item on the list that would require
discussion could be placed on a work session agenda along with other policy
proposals. Ms. Gust-Jenson said statf would confirm a list with Council Members
ofiust housekeeping changes and provide the list and a written brief in a Council
packet.
C. Citizen's Compensation Advisory Committee (CCAC) Replacement
Connie Spyropoulos-Linardakis (current Chair) and Charlotte Miller both the City Council
appointees for the citizen compensation advisory committee (CCAC) terms have expired effective
8/31/2013. They have finished the remainder of their predecessor's terms and neither has yet
filled a full four year term. Connie has expressed her desire and willingness to serve for an
additional term; however Charlotte Miller appreciated the opportunity to serve and thanks you
for the experience but does not believe she has the time necessary to commit to continue.
Charlotte did make a suggestion of a potential replacement-Ms. Marsha Turner with Barrick
Gold Corporation.
CCAS Evaluates and makes recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding
compensation levels for the City's elected officials and employees. Seven members - three
appointed by the Mayor, three appointed by the City Council, and one appointed by the
Committee. Membership consists of a balanced representation from residents of Salt Lake City
in terms of geographic, professional, neighborhood, and community interests. Employees of the
City are ineligible to serve on the committee. Committee members serve 4-year terms and meets
quarterly.
,,- Does the Council know of any individuals who might be interested in serving on the
committee to replace Charlotte Miller?
'r Does the Council wish to reappoint Ms. Spyropoulos-Linardakis?
Additional
City Council Announcements
October 15th, 2013
For Your Information
A. Downtown Rising Vision Dinner
This is a reminder that the Salt Lake Chamber and the Downtown Alliance are hosting a
dinner Wednesday that will do two things:
o Promote the Chamber's goals for the 2007 Downtown Rising Plan with Utah legislators.
o Honor Bill Evans for his work as Director of Government Relations for the LDS Church.
The dinner will be held Wednesday, October 16, at the Joseph Smith Memorial Building. It
will start with a reception at 6:30 p.m. Dinner will be served at 7 p.m. The parking entrance for
the event is located by driving westbound on South Temple and Main streets, according to a
printed invitation.
Chamber President Lane Beattie, and Downtown Alliance Board Chair Linda Wardell,
manager of the City Creek Center, are the evening's hosts. Each Council Member is invited to
bring a guest. The Salt Lake County Council also has been invited, Alliance Executive Director
Jason Mathis said at the Alliance Board meeting Monday.
Council Members Carlton Christensen and Jill Remington Love have accepted invitations
to the event. Alliance staff would like to know if more Council Members are interested in
attending. Mr. Mathis said the Chamber and Alliance have received a large number of responses
from Utah legislators.
Additional
City Council Announcements
October 8th, 2013
For Your Information 8:35:47 PM
Council staff is asking for the Council's approval of revisions to The
Rules of Procedures policy in keeping with the current order of business
for Council agendas. Potential Action Items section of the agenda is
currently missing as part of The Rules and Procedures policy and the
order of business has since changed since the last update of this policy.
);.,, Does the Council approve of these changes? Cindy Gust-Jenson,
Executive Council Director, said the changes just brought the Council
in line with what was currently being done.
» Council Rules of Procedure
>
> Rule 7: Order of Business and Organization of Council Agenda
>
> 1. The Council shall consider business in the following order:
> > a. Briefing Session (to be held from ~2:00-~6:30 p.m., or convened upon call of the
Chairperson).
> b. Opening Ceremonies:
> 1. Pledge of Allegiance
> 2. Approval of minutes
> 3. Bid award/special recognition
Le. Public Hearings: Public hearings shall consist of those items for which the Council would like
to receive public input. Such hearings shall include, but not be limited to. those requiring legal
advertisement under state law.
> d. Potential Action: To emphasize the importance of public hearings, decisions on issues
involving public hearings are made commonly one week after the public hearing under
"Potential Action" section of the City Council agenda. Delaying a decision by one week after
public hearings are held provides more opportunity for the public to submit written comment
and allows the Council more time to consider all comments before making a decision.
> e. Comments:
> 1. Questions to the Mayor
> 2. Public comments
LAIi Council meetings shall be open. Any Council Member, member of the Administration or
public may request time to address the Council on matters of City business. Requests for time
to address the Council, whenever practical, shall be scheduled by the Executive Director for the
first available Council meeting.
',, f. New Business: The New Business section introduces or is the first reading items on the
Council's agenda. No New Business item shall receive Council action unless at the discretion of
the Executive Director the item is deemed an emergency or if immediate action is desirable and
the Council chooses to vote on the item. Any Council Member can request deferral of an item
on the New Business section. All New Business items not designated emergency shall be
referred by motion or without objection to committee or a future Council agenda for further
action.
',, g. Unfinished Business: The Unfinished Business section shall consist of those items which
have received a first reading in a Council meeting or Work Session. All items on Unfinished
Business shall be subject to further discussion. Any Council Member may call for a roll call vote
on these items.
',, db_. Consent: The Consent agenda lists Council action which requires no further discussion or
which is routine in nature. All items on the Consent agenda shall be adopted by a single motion.
Prior to the motion to adopt the Consent agenda, any Council Member may have any item
removed from the Consent agenda in order to permit discussion on that item without the
necessity of a motion or a vote of removal of such item. If a majority of the Council Members
present at the Council meeting vote in favor of adopting the Consent agenda, every item on the
Consent agenda shall be adopted.
~-ef. Nev, Business: The New Business section introduces or is the first reading items on the
Council's agenda. No New Business item shall receive Council action unless at the discretion of
the e>wcutive Director the item is deemed an emergency or if immediate action is desirable and
the Council chooses to vote on the item. /1.ny Council Member can request deferral of an item
on the New Business section. /I.II New Business items not designated emergency shall be
referred by motion or without objection to committee or a future Council agenda for further
aa+efl-:-
~-f. Unfinished Business: The Unfinished Business section shall consist of those items which have
received a first reading in a Council meeting or 'Nork Session. /I.II items on Unfinished Business
shall be s1:1bject to hirther discussion. /1.ny Council Member mav call for a roll call vote on these
tteffi5-,
)i;> g. Public l=learings: Public hearings shall consist of those items for which the Council would like
to receive p1:1blic input. Such hearings shall include, but not be limited to, those requiring legal
advertisement under state law.
)., The Council may, by motion and majority vote, proceed out of order to any order of
business or return to an order.
).,
Additional Item:
Ms. Gust-Jenson said during a meeting Councilmember LaMalfa
attended with Utah Transit Authority (UTA) representatives, discussion
was held on the idea of holding a Council retreat with the UTA Board. She
said staff wanted to bring that suggestion to the Council for feedback. A
majority of the Council was in favor.
City Council Announcements
November, 19 2013
A. Citywide Wood Burning Prohibition
Council Member Simonsen and Council Member Garrott would like to discuss whether or not the City
Council should consider a ban on wood burning for home heating and recreation purposes. Dr. Brian
Moench, President of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment (UPHE), recently met with Council
Members Simonsen and Garrott, and Councilmember- Elect Mendenhall, and is prepared to present
relevant data on the personal, public, and environmental health hazards of wood burning. UPHE has
also offered to draft a wood burning ban ordinance to the Council's specifications.
Following is a brief summary of the some of the key health risks of wood burning:
• The California Air Resources Board has found that "the inhalable particle pollution from one
woodstove is equivalent to the amount emitted from 3,000 gas furnaces producing the same
amount of heat per unit."
• The ultrafine size of these particles causes them to behave like gases, leaving no practical way to
prevent wood smoke of one fireplace from contaminating neighboring homes.
• The EPA estimates that the lifetime cancer risk from wood stove smoke is twelve times higher
than that from an equal volume of second hand tobacco smoke, which is already banned in most
places.
• The UPHE reports that stagnant conditions and winter temperature inversions cause wood
smoke to hang close to the ground, easily penetrating homes and buildings.
Council Members Simonsen and Garrott are requesting expedited consideration of wood-burning
restrictions before the end of the calendar year, and the onset of anticipated winter inversions this
season. These might include adopting into ordinance existing Utah DEQ Standards prohibiting wood
burning during bad air days, extending these restrictions, or another action.
For those dependent on wood to provide for heating and cooking, Council Members Simonsen and
Garrott support the city exploring expansion of its sustainability funding programs to help people
transition away from using wood as fuel, in addition to other program goals such as renewable energy
and waste management. Council Members Simonsen and Garrott believe a ban on wood burning
supports the City Council's priority statement on sustainability by helping secure a clean airshed for
the region.
~ Is the Council interested in drafting an ordinance banning wood burning as a means
to address high-risk air quality problems that affect public health?
Councilmember LaMalfa said he would schedule this item for a work
session before the end of the year.
Additional
City Council Announcements
November 19th, 2013
For Your Information
A. Meeting with Utah Transit Authority Board
The scheduler for the Utah Transit Authority Board of Trustees confirmed this morning
that the best time December 9 for UTA Board members to meet with the City Council is from 11
a.m. to 1 p.m. The scheduler said she was confident that Board Chair Sen. Greg Hughes, Vice
Chair H. David Burton, and the chairs of UTA's three committees could attend then, as well as
Salt Lake City's Board Member Keith Bartholomew. The meeting still would be held at UTA's
Frontline Headquarters.
The reasons for the proposed change are:
1.) Apparently most Board members had planned to attend a 2 p.m. meeting UTA
staff had been unaware of.
2.) Keith Bartholomew's schedule on December 9 requires him to leave at 1 p.m.
It should be noted that the meeting between the UTA Board and the City Council would
conflict with the December meeting of the Utah League of Cities & Towns Legislative Policy
Committee meeting that is scheduled from 11:45 a.m. to 2 p.m. on December 9.
>- How many City Council Members would plan to attend the meeting with UTA
Board Members? Cindy Gust-Jenson said they would look at the
clipboard announcements to get the results.
B. Draft of Annual Council Meeting's
A draft of the Annual Council Meeting's Calendar for 2014 has been placed in each of
your red folders. Please let staff know as soon as possible if you see any conflicts with any
of these dates.
,,,_ ~-
City Council Announcements
December 3, 2013
A. Character Conservation District Clarification 8:04:30 PM
Recently, Planning Staff was asked to review the Historic Preservation and Character Conservation
ordinances to find out why the process for designating them is not the same. The Council passed the
ordinances on October 23, 2012. After reviewing the Council Staff report, minutes and the video of the
Council meeting, it is clear that the intent was to make the processes the same.
The adopted Character Conservation Designation Ordinance and codified ordinance states:
1. It takes 15% of property owners submit an application to study the district.
2. Then a Feasibility Study by the Planning Director happens. The Planning Director determines
whether the proposed district meets the standards. If the Planning Director determines that the
area is eligible for a character conservation district, notice is sent to all property owners affected
by the proposed district. Property owners have 30 days to respond. If a simple majority choices
to opt out, then the proposed request fails and can't move forward. If a simple majority is in
favor, the Planning Director prepares a report to the City Council, including how much the district
would cost to administer, and then the Council can vote to support moving forward with the
petition.
3. THEN it goes through an adoption process similar to that of designating a Historic District. After
HLC and PC recommendations a formal vote is sent out to property owners. If a majority is in
favor, the Council can pass it with a simple majority. If less than a majority of property owners
are in favor, it takes a super majority of Council Members to adopt the district.
Staff believes it was the intent of the Council for the Local Historic District and Conservation
District designation process to be the same. That would mean that the "vote relating to opting
out" in step 2 (above) should be eliminated. This would make it consistent with the Local Historic
District designation process. In making the correction noted above, the Planning Division is
proposing a few other changes to clarify language to better reflect the Council's intent in both the
Character Conservation District ordinance and the Designation ordinance.
Since this is an obvious error in the ordinance, the Council's Attorney, Neil Lindberg, has expressed the
opinion that that the Council does not need to take any formal action. We are bringing this error to your
attention and asking that you confirm our understanding of the Council's intent.
',- Did the Council intend the designation process to be the same for Local Historic
Districts and Conservation Districts? Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council
Director, said the Council's intention/motion was very clear so changes could be
made administratively. She said staff wanted to bring this to the Council's attention
so there was a public record of the situation.
B. Metropolitan Water District
The Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy has two board members whose terms will
expire in early January. The City has posted the required notice for these positions. One
application is from Pat Comarell, who currently serves on the Board and is technically required to
apply for consideration of reappointment. If Council Members support Ms. Comarell' s
reappointment, staff will add this to the agenda for December 10th.
For the other vacancy, staff will follow-up with Council Members separately. If Council Members
have any suggestions for potential appointments, please let staff know. Ms. Gust-Jenson said
there were two vacancies that needed to be filled by the Council. She said one position could be
filled by reappointing Pat Comarell. She said staff had received a couple of names so far and this
was the invitation for Council Members to submit names or for outgoing Council Members to
submit their own name. Councilmember Penfold asked about the application process. Ms. Gust-
Jenson said the one-month advertising requirement had been met and Lehua Weaver, Council
Research/Policy Analyst, would follow-up with each Council Member.
C. Appeal of Impact Fee Hearing
The City Council will hear an appeal by Utah Metal Works, Inc. (Appellant) regarding an impact
fee, associated with Building Permit BLD2013-04104, imposed by the Salt Lake City Department
of Community and Economic Development (Appellee). Below are the Council Members who have
confirmed with staff that they will be available to attend the Appeal of Impact Fee Hearing on
December 4, at 5:30pm. It is very important for these Council Members to attend the hearing and
later deliberate and vote. Ms. Gust-Jenson said since only four Council Members were planning to
attend, it was important for everyone to be at the hearing and stay through the entire process.
Councilmember Simonsen asked about the Council's role in the proceedings. Ms. Gust-Jenson
said Neil Lindberg, Council Legal Director, would provide information to the Council tomorrow.
Kyle
Jill
Charlie
Soren
Stan (tentative)
Additional
City Council Announcements
December 3rd, 19 2013
A. Economic Development Project:
Deputy Mayor David Everitt and Economic Development Director Stuart Clason will be in touch
with Council Members on an economic development project. At this time the details are
confidential because it is the subject of a Request for Proposal or similar process. Ms. Gust-
Jenson said there could be something on the horizon that the Administration might contact the
Council about.
B. Joint Resolution: Salt Lake City Council and the Utah Transit Authority
Board of Trustees
December 9, 201311-1:00 pm at UTA's Frontline Headquarters, 669 West 220 South
Whereas, Salt Lake City and the Utah Transit Authority have sustained a working relationship
to benefit the public since UTA's incorporation in 1970; and
Whereas, the Transit Authority has grown into a regional transit agency designed to serve
residents, businesses, and visitors along the length of the Wasatch Front; and
Whereas, the City and the Agency share with every level of Utah governments the great
responsibility ofleaving future generations with communities they can enjoy and raise
generations of their own; and
Whereas, projected population increases will require careful stewardship of the natural
resources provided to people living along the Wasatch Front and in Utah; and
Whereas, the Agency and the City have sought to fulfill mutual goals of providing cleaner air
and water, creating a balanced mix of transportation to reduce the effects of larger populations,
and fostering conditions for meaningful economic development that future generations may
build on;
Now therefore, be it resolved the Salt Lake City Council and the Utah Transit Authority
Board of Trustees pledge to continue to work together to resolve differences where they may
arise between the City and the Agency and to work with each other to insure that future
generations will have opportunities to achieve their destinies.
~ Do council members have any feedback? Ms. Gust-Jenson asked Council
Members to review proposed resolution language and provide comments to
Russell Weeks, Council Senior Policy Analyst. Councilmember Garrott requested
a copy of the resolution by e-mail.
C. UTA Kick-Off Ceremony & Inaugural Ride for the S-Line
The UTA Kick-Off Ceremony & Inaugural Ride for the S-Line will start at 2:00 pm at the South
Salt Lake City Stop 30 East 2240 South. Council Member Simonsen and Mayor Becker will both
have an opportunity to say a few words. All Council Members will be invited to sit on the stage.
Please let staff know if you are planning on attending. Ms. Gust-Jenson said Council Members
were invited to attend a luncheon following the ceremony /ride.
City Council Announcements
December 10th, 2013
A Council Policy Amendments
Confirmation of next steps: To follow-up on the Council's December 3rd briefing, staff
would like to confirm with the Council that the housekeeping amendments to the Policy
Manual will be incorporated as reviewed, but as a more significant project, staff will
review the Manual for other updates that are needed. This review would include:
sections throughout that need to be reviewed and updated with the Attorney's Office
and/ or Human Resources for consistency with current practice, updated State Code,
etc. The review will also go through the policies and statements regarding Land Use
(Sections E), Transportation (Section F), and other sections as appropriate, for
consistency with more recently approved Council statements on the topics. If Council
Members would like to meet with staff to provide feedback or comment on any of the
Manual, please let us know. For the Council's review, a clean full copy of the Policy
Manual is attached, with the housekeeping changes incorporated. Item was not
discussed.
Additional
City Council Announcements
December, 10 2013
A. Legislative Sponsorship of items
Below is an agenda item that is currently sponsored by outgoing Council Members and is tentatively
scheduled in January.
• Off Leash Dog Parks
These items are not scheduled yet, but still need a new sponsor:
• Bus Shelter and Advertising
• City Sponsored Day Care Program
• Ordinance: Oneida Triangle Open Space
• UTA Network Study
~ Are there any Council Members willing to sponsor any of the listed items? Item
was not discussed.
B. City Wide Transit Plan
Four council members have indicated that they would like to wait until January in order to review
the transit master plan RFP scope, in order to make sure Council Policy items are included.
~ Council staff would like to confirm this with the full group so that it is a matter of public
record. There was no objection from the Council Members.