03/20/2003 - Minutes (2) PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in a Work Session on Thursday, March 20,
2003 at 5:30 p.m. in Room 326, City Council Office, City County Building, 451 South
State Street.
In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Van Turner, Eric Jergensen, Nancy
Saxton, Jill Remington Love, and Dave Buhler
Absent: Councilmember Dale Lambert.
Also in Attendance: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Council Executive Director; David Nimkin,
Mayor' s Chief of Staff; Chris Bramhall, Assistant City Attorney; Gary Mumford, Council
Deputy Director; Janet Wolf, Director of Youth Programs; Michael Sears, Budget & Policy
Analyst; Janice Jardine, Council Planning & Policy Analyst; Sylvia Jones, Council
Constituent Liaison; Brent Wilde, Planning Deputy Director; David Dobbins, Community
and Economic Development Deputy Director; Joel Paterson, Planning Special Projects;
Doug Dansie, Downtown/Special Projects Planner, Elwin Heilmann, Deputy Controller;
Steve Fawcett, Management Services Deputy Director; Susi Kontgis, Budget Analyst;
Laurie Dillon, Budget Analyst; Rick Graham, Director of Public Services, LeRoy Hooton,
Director of Public Utilities; Jim Lewis, Public Utilities Financial Administrator,
Jeff Niermeyer, Public Utilities Deputy Director; Stephanie Duer, Water Conservation
Coordinator; Rick Giardina, Water Consultant and Chris Meeker, Chief Deputy Recorder.
Council Chair Christensen presided at and conducted the meeting.
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.
#1. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION
ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.
Ms. Gust-Jenson outlined the housing meeting. She handed out a rough schedule
for the fact-finding meeting. She said Mr. James Wood from the University of Utah
would speak ten minutes. She said after Mr. Wood all speakers would speak for five
minutes. She said there would be a mix of developers and real estate agents speaking.
She said the meeting would run until 9:10 p.m. with two breaks. She said Council
Members questions should be kept to ten minutes.
#2. INTERVIEW ANNE ERICKSON PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE
SISTER CITIES BOARD.
Ms. Erickson said she was involved in humanitarian efforts in the Ukraine. She
said she had worked with the Mayor' s Office regarding Sister Cities. Councilmember
Turner asked Ms. Erickson her goal for working with Sister Cities in the Ukraine. Ms.
Erickson said economic development was the next step.
#3. INTERVIEW RAMONA GONZALEZ PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE
POLICE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD.
Ms. Gonzalez said she worked for Salt Lake Community Action. She said it was her
feeling that the community and police needed to find mutual trust. She said police
could be more active and have a dialogue with the community.
4. INTERVIEW MARK GARFIELD PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS RE-APPOINTMENT TO THE
TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD.
Mr. Garfield said he had been on the board for one year. He said the board was
currently fact finding. He said he used every mode of transportation going to and
03 - 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003
from work. He said his strong point on the committee was efficiency and safety.
#5. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH SALT
LAKE COUNTY FOR THE AMERICORPS PROGRAM AT SORENSON MULTI-CULTURAL CENTER. View
Attachment
Briefing was not held at this time.
#6. RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 12 AND RELATED
RESOLUTIONS. View Attachment View Attachment
Michael Sears and Rick Graham briefed the Council. Mr. Sears referred to a handout
and discussed four possible motions. Councilmember Christensen said mitigation had
been met because another house was being built. Ms. Gust-Jenson said Public Services
had been working on a construction impact mitigation program which also publicized the
construction area. She said they were suggesting $30, 000 for the South Temple project.
Mr. Sears said this should be added to Initiative No. 16 of the recommendation and
would come from Capital Improvement Project (CIP) contingency.
Councilmember Saxton she was concerned that established business owners had to use
credit to pay for current expenses. She said the City needed to move quickly on the
construction. She asked Council Members if funding should come from CIP or if a small
business loan should be considered. All Council Members were in favor of funding from
CIP.
Councilmember Christensen asked Council Members if there were projects which could be
expedited with early bidding and CIP contingency funding. Mr. Sears said the yearly
Local Streets Reconstruction project, and the Americans with Disabilities (ADA) ramps
request for $300,000 could be funded. He said construction would still start in the
spring. He said the Transportation Division said an existing contract could be used
for traffic signal up-grades and be started this year. A discussion was held regarding
departmental requests for CIP funding.
Councilmember Love said even if there were projects, the City would not be able to
spend all available CIP funds for the current year. Mr. Sears said this was the second
year of the bi-annual budget and the timeline was limited. Councilmember Love asked
if CIP fund balance could be rolled over to the next year. Mr. Sears said that was
correct.
A discussion was held regarding the Utopia Project. Mr. Bramhall said the interlocal
had been adopted by 17 cities. He said there would be a revision to the interlocal
agreement. He said one revision was a category of changes that had been suggested
over time and the second was a category of changes that might be recommended by the
financial market.
Councilmember Christensen asked if the ADA ramps contract could be extended. Mr.
Graham said it was appropriate to re-bid the project.
#7. RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 321 -331 SOUTH 500 EAST FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY TO
RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE, PROPERTY LOCATED AT 550-558 EAST 300 SOUTH FROM RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE TO RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE AND PROPERTY LOCATED AT 326-348 SOUTH 600 EAST FROM
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-01-37.
(OVERLAND DEVELOPMENT, KENT HOLLMAN) (PUBLIC HEARING ITEM C-2 a, b, and c) View
Attachment
03 - 2
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003
Janice Jardine, Brent Wilde and Doug Dansie briefed the Council with the attached
handouts. Ms. Jardine referred to a letter from the Central City Neighborhood Community
Council. She said they did not support the re-zoning. Councilmember Saxton said she
would vote with the recommendation from the Planning Commission for the zoning change.
She said the change was a reduction of zoning. Councilmember Christensen said this
issue would be forwarded to a public hearing.
#8. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A REQUEST TO CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY
DISTRICT FOR THE AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1530 SOUTH 500 WEST
PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-02-32 (JERRY SEINER) . View Attachment
Janice Jardine and Brent Wilde briefed the Council with the attached handouts.
Councilmember Christensen asked why the overlay district would be limited to one
automobile dealership. Mr. Wilde said the petition had been received from Jerry
Seiner. He said a discussion had been held regarding the expansion of the overlay
district to the North. He said in mid process of the petition it had not been advertised
as the expansion. He said they had also considered this overlay district Citywide for
all car dealerships.
Councilmember Saxton asked the administration to look at the sign ordinance. She
said things had changed since 1995. She said the motion should be that the Council
encouraged the Planning Commission to review a new scope and vision for the sign
ordinance in general for Salt Lake City. Ms. Gust-Jensen suggested a legislative intent
statement. Mr. Wilde said an intent statement would guide staff.
#9. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING A REQUEST TO REZONE PROPERTY AT 1135 EAST 1700
SOUTH FROM INSTITUTIONAL TO RESIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-02-29. View
Attachment
Janice Jardine and Joel Paterson briefed the Council using the attached handouts.
#10. RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING A PROPOSED WATER CONSERVATION RATE
STRUCTURE. View Attachment
LeRoy Hooton, Jim Lewis, Gary Mumford, Rick Giardina, Jeff Niermeyer and
Stephanie Duer briefed the Council with the attached handouts. Ms. Gust-Jenson said
she wanted to make it clear that the Council's schedule had been open for this
discussion. Mr. Mumford said increased estimates for City parks had been received.
He said the figure was approximately $132,000. He said City golf courses increased
estimate was approximately $138, 000. He said other City facilities had estimated
approximately $18,000.
Mr. Lewis said the total estimated increase for the general fund was approximately
$287,000. He said this would change from year to year depending on weather. Mr.
Mumford referred to a handout regarding the water utility fund absorbing a portion of
the loss or revenue from conservation.
Mr. Hooton said over the years the Department of Public Utilities had been
diligent in controlling operational costs and being as efficient as possible. He said
they had recently contracted out asphalt repairs, combined water distribution and water
emergency crews, and eliminated a number of positions. He said he was concerned with
cutting too much. He said rates Salt Lake City charged as compared to other large
cities were low for water and sewer programs. Councilmember Saxton said Salt Lake
City charged less than other municipalities because providing the service cost less.
Mr. Giardina said rates would go up if conservation went beyond projections. He
03 - 3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003
said the rate structure provided flexibility to target how future rate increases should
be implemented. He said results would be reviewed yearly to see how much conservation
was achieved and adjustments could be made. He said the rate increase could be spread
on to those who were not conserving or on to blocks 2 and 3 of the rate structure. He
said those who conserved should not be penalized.
Mr. Hooton said the projection accounted for 1% per year for rate increases. He
said over the last 10 years the City Council had raised rates 54%. He said he believed
the same capital improvement programs and conservation could occur at the same level
as had been approved in the last decade. A discussion was held regarding the rate
structure and increases to the budget. A discussion was held regarding future
conservation. Mr. Lewis said the forecast was for a decrease of 8% usage. He said
this was a drop in water sales of 8%.
Mr. Lewis explained the water abatement programs. He said the first was the
American Red Cross water assist program and the second was the County Abatement program.
He said people who met certain criteria received 50% off their property tax. He said
if people were eligible for the County program the City gave them 50% off their garbage
fee. He said in 1996 when the rate change was implemented a decrease was also given
for water.
A discussion was held regarding future water needs and conservation. Mr. Lewis
said conservation savings were long term.
A discussion was held regarding establishing long-term reduction in building
excess capacity within the distribution system, treatment plant capacity, and acquiring
new water supplies. Mr. Hooton said with conservation, expenditures could be reduced
and there would be savings in the long run. He said conservation today would build for
the future.
A discussion was held regarding the fixed tier rate system. Ms. Saxton asked if
the system worked on a per household basis or per person basis. Mr. Giardina said the
proposed structure was fixed block approach. He said it did not consider the number
of people per household.
Mr. Hooton said in the past there had been a minimum charge. He said the current
program had no minimum and a user was only charged for water used. Ms. Duer said the
monthly bill would provide information on the volume of water used per block.
Councilmember Love asked to see the average household water use during the summer.
Mr. Lewis said he would get that to the Council. A discussion was held regarding ways
to save household water. Ms. Duer said simple behavioral changes made large differences.
Councilmember Buhler asked for cost shifts among classes of customers such as
commercial vs. household use. A discussion was held regarding identifying use amounts
for commercial and residential.
Councilmember Jergensen suggested identifying for the customers what an average
dishwasher use was or what an average shower use was. He said identifying numbers for
customers would be helpful. Mr. Hooton said the conversion from CFF to gallons would
be made on the bill.
Ms. Duer said the Public Utilities web page had information on indoor water use
and the conventional way to do an activity and the water wise way to do the activity.
She said the City newsletter had an article on how to save water indoors. She said
there would be more articles in the future.
03 - 4
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 2003
Councilmember Christensen said an economy of scale could be used for households.
Mr. Giardina said he did not think there were economies of scale for water use
activities.
Councilmember Love said a public hearing should be set for this issue. She said
citizens were anxious to participate in saving water. She said water was a valuable
commodity and choices needed to be made. She asked for implementation in June.
Councilmember Buhler suggested that water bill contain a notice for the hearing.
He asked the Administration to develop a matrix which showed decreases and increases
for the population. He said a one-year history of water use for each household was
helpful. A discussion was held regarding rate increases.
Mr. Lewis asked what the rate differential should be for the County rate structure. A
decision was made to keep the County rate structure at the same rate of 1.5.
#11. RECEIVE A BRIEFING ON PROPOSED BUDGET FOR WATER, SEWER AND STORM WATER. View
Attachment
This item was moved to the April 1, 2003 meeting.
#12. CONSIDER A MOTION TO ENTER INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION, IN KEEPING WITH UTAH
CODE, TO DISCUSS PENDING OR REASONABLY IMMINENT LITIGATION, PURSUANT TO UTAH CODE
ANNOTATED §§ 52-4-4 AND 52-4-5 (1) (A) (iii) .
Councilmember Buhler moved and Councilmember Turner seconded to enter into an
executive session, which motion carried all members present voted aye.
See file M 03-2 for Executive Session sworn statement information.
The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m.
cm
03 - 5
SALT' Af 41J G TY AORPO° . 1
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Salt Lake City Council
AGENDA
City Council Chambers
City& County Building
451 South State Street,Room 315
Salt Lake City,Utah
Thursday,March 20, 2003
7:00 p.m.
PLEASE NOTE: There will be no Comments to the Mayor or General Public Comments taken
during this meeting,because this is not a regularly scheduled formal Council
Meeting.However,there are two scheduled Public Hearings.
5:00 p.m., some Council Members may dine together in Room 126 at the City & County Building. (The
room is open to the public.)
A. WORK SESSION: 5:30 p.m.,Room 326, City&County Building,451 South State Street
(Items from the following list that Council is unable to complete in Work Session from 5:30-6:55
p.m.will be addressed in a Work Session setting following the Consent Agenda.)
1. Report of the Executive Director, including review of Council information items and
announcements.
2. The Council will interview Anne Erickson prior to consideration of her appointment to the Sister
Cities Board.
3. The Council will interview Ramona Gonzalez prior to consideration of her appointment to the
Police Civilian Review Board.
4. The Council will interview Mark Garfield prior to consideration of his appointment to the
Transportation Advisory Board.
5. The Council will receive a briefing regarding an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with Salt Lak c-61,01k
County for the AmeriCorps program at Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center. o • li)
6. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing regarding Budget Amendment No. 12 and related z.
resolutions. (Public Hearing Item C-1)
7. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing regarding a request to rezone property located at 321-
331 South 500 East from Residential Office and Residential Multi-Family to Residential Mixed-
Use, property located at 550-558 East 300 South from Residential Office to Residential Mixed-. Use,
and property located at 326-348 South 600 last from Multi-Family Residential to Residential
Mixed-Use. (Overland Development,Ken Holman) (Public Hearing Item C-2 a,b and c)
8. The Council will receive a briefing regarding a request to create an alternative sign overlay district
for the automobile dealership properties located at 1530 South 500 West(Jerry Seiner).
9. The Council will receive a briefing regarding a request to rezone property at 1135 East 1700 South
from Institutional to Residential.
10. The Council will receive a follow-up briefing regarding a proposed water conservation rate
structure.
11. The Council will receive a briefing on proposed budget for Water, Sewer and Storm water.
12. (Tentative)The Council will consider a motion to enter into an Executive Session, in keeping with
Utah Code, to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation,pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § §
52-4-4 and 52-4-5 (1)(a)(iii).
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 1 1
TELEPHONE: 801-535.7600, FAX: SO 1-535-7651
®RECYCLED PAPER
,
Salt Lake City Council Agenda
Thursday,March 20,2003
B. OPENING CEREMONY:
1. Pledge of Allegiance.
2. The Council will approve the minutes of March 11, 2003. G`
V):C. PUB IC HEARINGS: \2� 0 el
. Ordinance: Budget Amendment No. 12 7);\1\9)1
Accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance ame ing Salt Lake City Ordinance No.
32 of 2001, which adopted the Final Biennial Budget of Salt Lake City,including the employment
staffing document, for Fiscal years 2001-200,2_,and 2002-2003.
(B 03-5) � k rid Lk'L01 lml •-
Q
O
Staff Recommendation: Close and consider options. { Q�rdinance: Petition No. 400-01-37, Overland Development rezoning requests \///\
/ Ordinance: rezone the property located at 321-331 South 500 East from Residential Office
and Residential Multi-Family to Residential Mixed-use
``�� Accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located at
6 \v 321-331 South 500 East from Residential Office(RO) and Residential Multi-Family(RMF-
�J 35)to Residential Mixed-use (R-MU).
(P 03-6)
Staff Recommendation: Close and consider options.
b6.\\O%-i . Ordinance: rezone the property located at 550-558 East 300 South from Residential Office
to Residential Mixed-use
Accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located at
\\ 550-558 East 300 South from Residential Office (RO) to Residential Mixed-use(R-MU).
(P 03-6)
Staff Recommendation: Close and consider options.
c. Ordinance: rezone the property located at 326-348 South 600 East from Residential Multi-
75\. ),..
Family to Residential Mixed-use
Accept public comment and consider adopting an ordinance rezoning the property located at
326-348 South 600 East from Residential Multi-Family(RMF-35) to Residential Mixed-use
(R-MU).
(P 03-6)
Staff Recommendation: Close and consider options.
D. COMMENTS:
(None.) (There will be no Comments to the Mayor or General Public Comments taken during this
meeting,because this is not a regularly scheduled formal Council Meeting.)
2
Salt Lake City Council Agenda 0-1/-
Thursday,March 20,2003
E. NEW BUSINESS: " Vk, \4.. iy
t. ki,:c i
(None.) �i%r ,
7
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: e l 40,l� if
1. Resolution: Authorize Salt Lake City Corporation to accept the Boston Museum of Science award
from the Salt Lake City Foundation
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing Salt Lake City Corporation to accept the Boston Museum
of Science award from the Salt Lake City Foundation for the Sorenson Center Computer Clubhouse
Grant. (Resolution related to Budget Amendment No. 12)
( 03-131)/ ' �\
Staff Recommendation: Adopt.
2. Resolution: Authorize Salt Lake City to enter 'nto an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement to become a
/
member of the Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency(UTOPIA); and to appoint a
city representative to serve as a member of the UTOPIA Board of Directors
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing Salt Lake City to enter into an Interlocal Cooperative
Agreement to become a member of the Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency
(UTOPIA); and to appoint a city representative to serve as a member of the UTOPIA Board of
Directors. (Resolution related to Budget Amendment No. 12)
--E a 3-k37
Staff Recommendation: Adopt.
3 Motion: District Six Neighborhood Olympic Legacy project
c)\/-
Consider adopting a motion expressing the Council's approval of the proposed Neighborhood
Olympic Legacy project for City Council District Six.
(G 03-11)
G. CONSE T:
rdinance: Budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City, Utah for Fiscal year 2002-2003
Set the date of April 15,2003 at 7:00 p.m. to accept public and consider adopting an ordinance
amending the budget for the Library Fund of Salt Lake City,Utah for fiscal year 2002-2003.
(B 03-3)
Staff Recommendation: Set date. 109).
.4"1-:
1/\
2. Board Appointment: Daniel Levin,Police Civilian Review Board
Consider approving the appointment of Daniel Levin to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term
extending through September 6, 2004.
(I 03-15)
Staff Recommendation: Approve.
3
Salt Lake City Council Agenda Thursday,March 20,2003AV\
3. Board Appointment: Paula Wolfe,Police Civilian Review Board !v
Consider approving the appointment of Paula Wolfe to the Police Civilian Review Board for a term
G ' ' extending through September 6,2004.
' (I03-15)
Staff Recommendation: Approve. jJ \1/\
vAl
3. Board Appointment: Claudia Hope O'Grady,Police Civilian Review Board
Consider approving the appointment of Claudia Hope O'Grady to the Police Civilian Review Board
for a term extending through September 5, 2005.
(I 03-15) 0
Staff Recommendation: Approve. �
12
J" "
. Board Appointment: Mary Ann Villarreal, Library Board
V
Consider approving the appointment of Mary Ann Villarreal to the Library Board for a term
extending through June 30,2005.
(I 03-7)
Staff Recommendation: Approve. A
���
. Board Appointment: Elaine McDonald, Golf Enterprise Fund Advisory Board
5 XN`
Consider approving the appointment of Elaine McDonald to the Golf Enterprise Fund Advisory
Board for a term extending through July 17, 2006.
(I 03-18) ��
Staff Recommendation: Approve.
6. Board Appointment: Term ending date correction for Richard Howa,Airport Board
Specify the correct term dates for the appointment of Richard Howa to the Airport Board, for a term
beginning March 4, 2003 and ending January 15, 2007.
(I 03-14) ,Ati)\
Staff Recommendation: Approve.
el. Board Appointment: Mark Garfield, Transportation Advisory Board
Consider approving the appointment of Mark Garfield to the Transportation Advisory Board for a
term extending through September 26, 2005.
(I 03-17)
H. ADJOURNMENT:
Dat . arch 18, 2003
By:
Deputy City Recorde
4
Salt Lake City Council Agenda
Thursday,March 20,2003
STATE OF UTAH )
. ss.
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
On the 18th day of March 2003, I personally delivered a copy of the foregoing notice to the Mayor
and City Council and posted copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following tinies and locations
within the City&County Building,451 South State Street, Salt Lake City,Utah:
1. At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office,Room 415; and
2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom,Room 315.
0
a ,
P
Deputy City Recorder
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18t1i day of ch 2003
r ,
my Co.r;mfss- Expires Notary Public residing in th tate Utah
'z..., S,_;e St Room 415 Approval:
�'..34111 1
E ex cutiie Director
Access agendas at http://www.ci.slc.ut.us/council/agendas/default.htm.A sound system for the hearing impaired is
available and headphones can be obtained for all public meetings upon four hours advance notice. Arrangements can be
made for sign language interpreters;please allow 72 hours advance notice. TDD Number 535-6021. Assistive listening
devices are available on Channel I. Large type and#2 Braille agendas are available upon 72 hours advance notice.
*Final action may be taken and/or adopted concerning any item on this agenda. After 5:00 p.m.,please enter the
City&County Building through the east entrance. Accessible route is located on the east side of the building.
In accordance with State Statute,City Ordinance and Council Policy,one or more Council Members may be connected
via speakerphone.
5
MAR 0 4 2033
RICHARD GRAHAM Mkt, A aGl GORPA l
il
$ MIT
ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON
PUBLIC SERVICES DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES MAYOR
February 18, 2003
COUNCIL TANSMITTAL
TO: Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement between Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County for the
Operation of the Americorps Program at the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council support the Agreement; allow the
Resolution that authorizes the Director of public Services to sign the Agreement; and also
allow the expenditure of funds for the stated purposes of the Agreement.
FUNDING: The cost of funding the program for calendar year 2003 will be $4,000.
Funding will come from the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center operations budget.
BACKGROUND and DISCUSSION: Salt Lake County has entered into a grant
agreement with the State of Utah to supervise the Americorps program in the Salt Lake
County area. This authorizes the County to contract with other entities,both private and
municipal, for the delivery of services within the scope of the agreement. Salt Lake City
would again like to have the Americorps program provide staff support to the Computer
Center program sponsored by the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center. The computer
program also received County support in 2002 under an identical agreement.
The County is willing to provide the staff person at a cost of$4,000. The duties of the
Americorps volunteer will be as follows:
• To assist the computer center users.
• To develop projects.
• To assist in scheduling and coordinating volunteer mentors.
• To teach users how to use the computer and the Internet.
The Americorps volunteer will work between 25 to 30 hours per week. Utilizing
Americorps allows the City to staff a position at a much lower cost than what would be
required to pay for a part-time hourly employee.
CONTACT PERSON: Rosanita Cespedes 886-9460
SUBMITTED BY: Rick Graham 535-7774
f
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 148, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 1 1
TELEPHONE: 801-535-7775 FAX: 801-535-7789
�� aecvc Leo PnPerz
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
AMERICORPS COMMUNITY ACCESS TO TECHNOLOGY(ACAT)
AMERICORPS PROGRAM
(Including funding provisions)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and executed as of the day of
, by and between SALT LAKE COUNTY("COUNTY"), a body corporate and
politic of the State of Utah, for its Community Resources and Development Division
(CRDD), and Salt Lake City Corporation, Public Services Department, Sorenson Multi-
Cultural Center("HOST ORGANIZATION"), collectively referred to herein as the
"Parties."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the COUNTY has entered into a grant agreement with the State of
Utah to supervise within Salt Lake County an AmeriCorps Program ("Program"); and
WHEREAS, the above-mentioned grant agreement authorizes the COUNTY to
contract with other entities, public or private, for services in support of the Program; and
WHEREAS, the Parties intend to fully comply with the express and implied intent
of the National and Community Service Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. § 12501 et seq. (the
"Act"), as well all applicable federal, state, and local regulation; and
WHEREAS, the HOST ORGANIZATION intends to transfer funds to the
COUNTY to assist the COUNTY in administering the Program.
NOW THEREFORE,by virtue of the authority recited and the mutual promises
contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. DURATION: This agreement shall be effective as of January 01, 2003 through
December 31, 2003.
2. JURISDICTION: The provisions of this agreement shall be governed by the laws
of the State of Utah.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The Parties shall establish safeguards to prohibit
their respective employees, board members, advisors and agents from using
positions for a purpose that is, or gives the appearance of being, motivated by
desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they
have family, business or other ties. The Parties shall disclose to each other any
conflict of interest or potential conflict of interest described above, immediately
upon discovery of such.
4. ETHICAL STANDARDS: The Parties represent that neither has: (1)provided an
illegal gift or payoff to an officer or employee or former officer or employee, or
his or her relative or business entity of the other party; (2)retained any person to
solicit or secure this contract upon agreement or understanding for a commission,
percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, other than bona fide employees or bona
fide commercial selling agencies fro the purpose of securing business; (3)
knowingly breached any of the ethical standards set forth in the City's conflict of
interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt Lake Code or any comparable Salt Lake
County ethical standards ordinances or policies; or (4) knowingly influenced, and
hereby promises that they will not knowingly influence, an officer or employee or
former officer or employee of the other party to breach any of the ethical
standards set forth in the City's conflict of interest ordinance, Chapter 2.44, Salt
Lake City Code, or any comparable Salt Lake County ethical standards
ordinances or policies.
5. TERMINATION: The parties may terminate their nonmonetary obligations under
this agreement with or without cause at any time at their convenience. However,
if the HOST ORGANIZATION terminates its nonmonetary obligations under this
agreement, all accounts and payments will be processed according to the terms
and arrangements set forth in Attachment B for approved services. If the
COUNTY terminates its obligations under this agreement, all accounts and
payments will be processed according to the terms and arrangements set forth
herein for approved services rendered as of the date of termination.
6. SEPARABILITY CLAUSE: A declaration by any court, or any other binding
legal source, that any provision of this agreement is illegal and void shall not
affect the legality and enforceability of any other provision of this contract, unless
such provisions are mutually dependent.
7. INDEMNIFICATION: Both parties are governmental entities under the
Governmental Immunity Act, § 63-30-1 et seq.,Utah Code Ann. (1953, as
amended). Consistent with the terms of the Act, the parties shall agree that each
party is responsible and liable for any wrongful or negligent acts which it
commits or which are committed by it's agents, officials or employees.Neither
party waives any defenses other wise available under the Governmental Immunity
Act.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. COUNTY'S DUTIES: To insure strict compliance with the grant agreement, the
COUNTY agrees to provide the services and resources described in Attachment A
which is incorporated into and made a part of this agreement and to otherwise
comply with the requirements of the AmeriCorps Provisions of the grant attached
as attachment C.
2. HOST ORGANIZATION'S DUTIES: The HOST ORGANIZATION agrees to
provide the services and resources described in Attachment B which is
incorporated into and made a part of this agreement and to otherwise comply with
the requirements of the AmeriCorps Provisions of the grant attached as
attachment C.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as
follows:
SALT LAKE COUNTY
By:
Nancy Workman or Designee
Mayor, Salt Lake County
STATE OF UTAH )
:ss
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE )
ON THIS day of , 2002, personally appeared before me
,who being duly sworn, did say that (s)he is the
of Salt Lake County, Office of Mayor, and that the foregoing
instrument was signed on behalf of Salt Lake County, by authority of law.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Residing in Salt Lake County
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL
COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND
DEVELOPMENT
By:
Michael Gallegos, Director
Date:
APPROVED TO FORM
SALT LAKE COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTO ', EY'S OFF, CE
By: -- RA A
D puty Dis a ict Attorney
Data
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
Public Services, Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center
By:
Title:
ATTEST: Approved as to Form
Salt Lake City's Attorney's Office
Date:
By: ,4—
CHIEF CITY RECORDER
ATTACHMENT A
ATTACHMENT A
The COUNTY shall:
(a) Provide 1 (One)AmeriCorps Members ("ACMs")to serve on behalf of the HOST
ORGANIZATION.
(b) Provide for education awards to ACMs who fulfill their commitment to the
Program. To receive such awards, ACMs must (1) complete 1700 hours within
the service term, and (2) receive satisfactory performance reviews.
(c) Provide program staff for consultation with the HOST ORGANIZATION staff on
decisions or problems concerning ACMs.
(d) Direct the Program by furthering recruitment, tutoring, and lawful services to
lower income groups as set forth in its AmeriCorps state application.
(e) Provide program staff for overall supervision of ACMs including individual
conferences.
(f) Maintain for three (3)years verifiable records documenting each ACM's
eligibility to serve and any other information relating to each individual member.
(g) Conduct criminal background checks prior to ACM placement on all ACMs who,
during the course of their service, will have substantial direct contact with
children or who will perform service in the homes of children or individuals
considered vulnerable, as determined by the COUNTY,to the extent permitted by
state and local law. The COUNTY shall maintain the results of these background
checks in the individual ACM files.
(h) Provide an orientation at the beginning of each ACM's term of service.
(i) Provide Worker's Compensation Insurance for ACM's as required by Utah Code
Ann. § 67-20-3(1).
(j) Provide a Health Care policy to full-time ACMs who are not otherwise covered
by a Health Care policy at the time of enrollment into the Program.
(k) Provide childcare to full-time ACMs who require it.
(1) Provide liability insurance for ACMs which covers both on-site and off-site
Project activities.
(m) Consult with, prior to ACM placement, local labor unions which represent
employees of the HOST ORGANZIATION or employees in the area served by
the Program to insure compliance with the non-displacement requirements set
forth by federal regulation.
(n) Allow ACMs who have served for at least twelve (12)months and 1250 hours to
take leave in accordance with the Family and Medical Leave Act.
ATTACHMENT B
ATTACHMENT B
The HOST ORGANIZATION shall:
(a) Provide the COUNTY with$4,000.00 (Four thousand dollars) in consideration of
the services provided by the COUNTY to the HOST ORGANIZATION
(including but not limited to the services set forth in Attachment A) to offset the
COUNTY's costs associated with administering the Program. The HOST
ORGANIZATION shall provide the COUNTY such funds within thirty(30) days
of signing this agreement.
(b) Provide the funds as set forth in subsection(a) of this attachment even if the
HOST ORGANIZATION terminates this agreement pursuant to Section four (4)
of the General Provisions found herein. The COUNTY has no obligation to
refund any funds on a pro rata, or any other, basis in the event of such termination
by the HOST ORGANIZATION.
(c) Provide the funds as set forth in subsection(a) of this attachment even if one, or
more, of the AmeriCorps Members ("ACMs") assigned to work for the HOST
ORGANIZATION terminates his or her relationship with the Program. If one, or
more, of the ACMs assigned to perform services for the HOST
ORGANIZATION does terminate his or her relationship with the Program, the
COUNTY will have no obligation to replace such ACM.
(d) Maintain accurate time records and forward copies of each ACM's time records to
the COUNTY on a timely basis.
(e) Provide day-to-day supervision for the ACMs.
(f) Release ACMs from routine duties to attend special events,workshops or training
planned for them by AmeriCorps staff
(g) Provide opportunities for ACMs to perform duties relevant to the objectives of the
AmeriCorps grant. (45 Code of Federal Regulations § 2500.1) These objectives
are to:
(1) Renew the ethic of civic responsibility in the United States;
(2) Encourage citizens, regardless of age, income or ability, to engage in full-
time or part-time service to the Nation;
(3) Involve youth in programs that will benefit the Nation and improve their
own lives;
(4) Enable young adults to make a sustained commitment to service by
removing barriers created by high education costs, loan indebtedness and
the cost of housing;
(5) Build on the network of existing Federal, State, and local programs and
agencies to expand full-time and part-time service opportunities for all
citizens,particularly youth and older Americans;
(6) Involve participants in activities that would not otherwise be performed by
paid workers;
(7) Generate additional volunteer service hours to help meet human,
educational, environmental and public safety needs, particularly those
relating to poverty;
(8) Encourage institutions to volunteer their resources and energies and
encourage service among their members, employees, and affiliates;
(9) Identify successful and promising community service initiatives and
disseminate information about them; and
(10) Discover and encourage new leaders, especially youth leaders, and to
develop individuals and institutions that demonstrate that a successful life
includes serving others.
(h) Prevent ACMs from performing duties that will supplant the hiring of an
employed worker or workers or require services that have been performed by or
were assigned to any presently employed worker, a recently discharged or
resigned employee, an employee who is subject to a reduction in force or who has
recall rights pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or applicable personnel
procedures, an employee currently on leave, or a striking or locked-out employee.
(i) Not require or permit ACMs, during the course of their service, to:
(1) Engage in efforts to influence legislation;
(2) Organize or engage in protests,petitions,boycotts, or strikes;
(3) Assist, promote, or deter union organizing;
(4) Impair existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements;
(5) Engage in partisan political activities or other activities designed to
influence the outcome of an election;
(6) Participate in, or endorse, events or activities that are likely to include
advocacy for or against political parties, political platforms,political
candidates, proposed legislation, or elected officials;
(7) Engage in religious instruction, conduct worship services, or provide any
direct benefit to religious activities unless grant funds are not used to
support the religious activity; or,
(8) Engage in any organized fund raising including, but not limited to,
financial campaigns, endowment drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests,
and similar activities designed for the sole purpose of raising capital or
obtaining contributions for the HOST ORGANIZATION unless the
COUNTY determines, and approves in writing, that such activity complies
with the AmeriCorps regulations.
(j) Provide "reasonable accommodations"to make programs and activities accessible
to persons with mental or physical disabilities
(k) Insure the safety of all ACMs and prevent ACMs from participating in projects
that pose undue safety risks.
ATTACHMENT C
AMERICORPS PROVISIONS
AmeriCorps® Provisions
The AmeriCorps Provisions are binding on the Grantee. By accepting funds under this
Grant, the Grantee agrees to comply with the AmeriCorps Provisions all applicable federal
statutes, regulations and guidelines, and any amendments thereto. The Grantee agrees to operate
the funded Program in accordance with the approved Grant application and budget, supporting
documents, and other representations made in support of the approved Grant application.The
Grantee agrees to include in all subgrants the applicable terms and conditions contained in this
award.
For the purposes of these Provisions, AmeriCorps refers to AmeriCorps*State,
AmeriCorps*National and AmeriCorps*Tribes and Territories Programs only.
All applicable Provisions of the Grant including regulations and OMB circulars that are
incorporated by reference shall apply to any Grantee, sub-Grantee, or other organization carrying
out activities under this award.
Page
A. DEFINITIONS 4
B. AMERICORPS SPECIAL PROVISIONS 7
1. Purpose of Award 7
2. Affiliation with the AmeriCorps National Service Network 7
3. Local and State Consultation 8
4. Prohibited Program Activities 8
5. Fund Raising 9
6. Eligibility, Recruitment, and Selection 10
7. Training, Supervision, and Support 12
8. Terms of Service 15
9. Release from Participation 17
10. Minor Disciplinary Actions 19
11. Living Allowances, In-Service Benefits, and Taxes 20
12. Post-Service Education Awards 25
13. Matching Requirements 26
14. Member Records and Confidentiality 27
15. Budget and Programmatic Changes 28
16. Reporting Requirements 29
17. Grant Period and Incremental Funding 30
C. GENERAL PROVISIONS 31
18. Legislative and Regulatory Authority 31
19. Other Applicable Statutory and Administrative Provisions 31
20. Responsibilities under Grant Administration • 37
21. Financial Management Provisions 32
22. Administrative Costs 34
23. Equipment and Supply Costs 35
24. Project Income 36
FINAL-JUNE,2002 2
Page
25. Payments under the Grant 36
26. Retention of Records 36
27. Site Visits 37
28. Liability and Safety Issues 37
29. Drug-Free Workplace 37
30. Non-Discrimination 38
31. Supplementation,Non-Duplication,and Non-Displacement 42
32. Grievance Procedures 43
33. Ownership and Sharing of the Award Products 45
34. Publications 46
35. Performance Measurement and Evaluation 46
36. Suspension and Termination of the Award 46
37. Order of Precedence 47
FINAL-JUNE,2002 3
A. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Grant the following definitions apply:
1. Act means the National and Community Service Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. 12501
et seq.)
2. Administrative Costs are expenses associated with the overall administration of a Program,
and are defined in the General Provisions, Clause 22, Administrative Costs.
3. AmeriCorps National Service Network means AmeriCorps*State, AmeriCorps*National,
AmeriCorps*Tribes and Territories, Volunteers in Service to America(VISTA), and
National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC) Programs taken together as programs dedicated
to national service. VISTA is authorized under the Domestic Volunteer Service Act (42
U.S.C. 4950 etseq.). NCCC is authorized under the National and Community Service Act
(42 U.S.C. 12611 et seq.).
4. Approved National Service Position means a national service position for which the
Corporation has approved the provision of a national service education award as one of the
benefits to be provided for successful service in the position.
5. Corporation means the Corporation for National and Community Service established under
section 191 of the Act(42 U.S.C. 12651).
6. Education Award means an award provided to a member who has successfully completed a
required term of service in an approved national service position and who otherwise meets
the eligibility criteria in the Act. An education award may be used: (1) to repay qualified
student loans, as defined in the Act; (2) toward educational expenses at a Title IV Institution
of Higher Education; and (3) toward expenses incurred in participating in school-to-work
programs approved by the Secretaries of Labor and Education.
7. Grantee, for the purposes of this agreement, means the direct recipient of this Grant. The
term sub-Grantee shall be substituted for the term Grantee where appropriate. The Grantee is
also responsible for ensuring that Sub-Grantees or other organizations carrying out activities
under this award comply with these provisions, including regulations and OMB circulars
incorporated by reference. The Grantee is legally accountable to the Corporation for the use
of Grant funds and is bound by the provisions of the Grant.
8. Indian Tribe means a federally-recognized Indian tribe, band, nation, or other recognized
group or community, including any Native village, Regional Corporation, or Village
Corporation, as defined under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602),
that the United States Government determines is eligible for special programs and services
provided under federal law to Indians because of their status as Indians. An Indian tribe also
includes any tribal organization controlled, sanctioned, or chartered by one of the entities
described above.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 4
9. Member means an individual:
a. Who is enrolled in an approved national service position;
b. Who is a U.S. citizen, U.S. national or lawful permanent resident alien of the United
States;
c. Who is at least 17 years of age at the commencement of service unless the member is out
of school and enrolled
i. In a full-time, year-round youth corps Program or full-time summer Program as
defined in the Act (42 U.S.C. 12572 (a) (2)), in which case he or she must be
between the ages of 16 and 25, inclusive, or
ii. In a Program for economically disadvantaged youth as defined in the Act (42
U.S.C. 12572 (a)(9)), in which case he or she must be between the ages of 16 and
24, inclusive;
d. Has a high school diploma or an equivalency certificate (or agrees to obtain a high school
diploma or its equivalent before using an education award) and who has not dropped out
of elementary or secondary school in order to enroll as an AmeriCorps member(unless
enrolled in an institution of higher education on an ability to benefit basis and is
considered eligible for funds under section 484 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20
U.S.C. 1091), or who has been determined through an independent assessment conducted
by the Program to be incapable of obtaining a high school diploma or its equivalent.
10. National Service Trust is the account established in the U.S. Department of the Treasury
under the Act(42 U.S.C. 12601) for the purpose of holding and making payments of
education awards and other education benefits to AmeriCorps members.
11. OMB means the U.S. Office of Management and Budget.
12. Out-Of-School Youth means youth age 16 and older who have either dropped out or
otherwise have no permanent affiliation with a secondary school. This definition does not
include individuals who are in between school years and fully intend to return to school in
the fall.
13. Parent Organization means a grantee that is responsible for implementing and managing a
National Direct AmeriCorps Program.
14. Program means a national service Program, described in the Act(42 U.S.C. 12572(a)),
carried out by the Grantee through funds awarded by the Corporation and carried out in
accordance with federal requirements and the Provisions of this Grant.
15. Project means an activity or set of activities carried out under a Program that results in a
specific, identifiable community service or improvement:
a. That otherwise would not have been made with existing funds; and
b. That does not duplicate the routine services or functions of the organization to which the
members are assigned.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 5
16. Project Sponsor means an organization or other entity that has been selected to provide a
national service position for a member.
17. Service Recipient means a community beneficiary who receives a service or benefit from the
service of AmeriCorps members.
18. State Commission means the Commission on National and Community Service established
by a state pursuant to the Act(42 U.S.C. 12638), including an authorized alternative
administrative entity to administer the state's national service plan and national service
programs and to perform such other duties prescribed by 45 C.F.R. 2550.80.
19. Sub-Grantee refers to an organization receiving AmeriCorps Grant funds from a Grantee of
the Corporation.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 6
B. AMERICORPS SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. PURPOSES OF THE GRANT.
The general purposes of this Grant are "Getting Things Done" in communities, strengthening the
ties that bind communities together, and developing the citizenship and skills of AmeriCorps
members. Activities funded through this Grant must help engage Americans of all backgrounds
as members in community-based service that provides a direct and demonstrable benefit that is
valued by the community. Service activities must result in a specific documented service or
improvement that otherwise would not be provided with existing funds or volunteers and that
does not duplicate the routine functions of workers or displace paid employees.
2. AFFILIATION WITH THE AMERICORPS NATIONAL SERVICE NETWORK.
a. Identification as an AmeriCorps Program or Member. The Grantee must identify the
Program as an AmeriCorps Program and members eligible for a Corporation-approved
post-service education award as AmeriCorps members.
b. The AmeriCorps Name and Logo. AmeriCorps is a registered service mark of the
Corporation for National Service. The Grantee must use the AmeriCorps name and logo
on service gear and public materials such as stationery, application forms, recruitment
brochures, orientation materials, member curriculum, signs, banners, press releases and
publications created by AmeriCorps members in accordance with Corporation
requirements. The Corporation provides a camera-ready logo.
To establish the relationship between the Program and AmeriCorps, the Grantee must use
the phrase "The AmeriCorps National Service Network" or"an AmeriCorps Program"
and may use the slogan "Getting Things Done"Th on such materials in accordance with
Corporation guidelines and requirements. The Grantee may not alter the AmeriCorps
logo, and must obtain the written permission of the Corporation before:
i. Using the AmeriCorps name or logo on materials that will be sold, or
ii. Permitting donors to use the AmeriCorps name or logo in promotional materials.
c. AmeriCorps Service Gear. The Grantee is encouraged to provide the Core AmeriCorps
Service Gear Package for each member. The core package includes the standard items
made available by the Corporation. The Grantee should direct members to wear their
service gear at officially designated AmeriCorps events and may allow members to wear
their service gear at other times consistent with Corporation guidelines. The Grantee may
not use Corporation funds to purchase local Program service gear. .
d. Participation in AmeriCorps Events. The Grantee agrees, within reasonable limits, to
arrange for members to participate in AmeriCorps events and activities sponsored by the
Corporation, such as the National Opening Ceremonies, conferences and national service
days.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 7
3. LOCAL AND STATE CONSULTATION.
a. Community Consultation. The Grantee must design, implement and evaluate the
funded project with extensive and broad-based community involvement, including
consultation with representatives from the community served, members and potential
members, community-based agencies with a demonstrated record in providing services,
foundations and businesses.
b. Labor Union Concurrence. Prior to the placement of members, the Grantee must
consult with local labor organizations representing employees of project sponsors or
representing employees in the area to be served by the Program. This includes people
engaged in the same or similar work as that proposed to be carried out by the Program,
and is required to ensure compliance with the non-displacement requirements contained
in Clause 31 of these Grant Provisions.
c. State Commission Consultation. In coordination with the Corporation,
AmeriCorps*National and AmeriCorps*Tribes and Territories Grantees are strongly
encouraged to consult on a regular basis with the State Commission in each state that a
Program operates. Such communications build upon existing programs throughout the
state while avoiding the duplication of efforts in other AmeriCorps Programs.
4. PROHIBITED PROGRAM ACTIVITIES.
While charging time to the AmeriCorps Program, accumulating service or training hours, or
otherwise performing activities associated with the AmeriCorps program or the Corporation,
staff and members may not engage in the following activities:
a. Attempting to influence legislation.
b. Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes.
c. Assisting, promoting or deterring union organizing.
d. Impairing existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements.
e. Engaging in partisan political activities or other activities designed to influence the
outcome of an election to any public office.
f. Participating, in, or endorsing, events or activities that are likely to include advocacy for
or against political parties, political platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation,
or elected officials.
g. Engaging in religious instruction; conducting worship services; providing instruction as
part of a Program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship; constructing
FINAL-JUNE.2002 8
or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship; maintaining facilities
primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship; or engaging in any
form of religious proselytization.
h. Providing a direct benefit to:
i. A for-profit entity;
ii. A labor union;
iii. A partisan political organization; or
iv. An organization engaged in the religious activities described in the preceding sub-
clause, unless Grant funds are not used to support the religious activities.
v. A nonprofit entity that fails to comply with the restrictions contained in section
501(c)(3) of U.S. Code Title 26.
i. Voter registration drives by AmeriCorps members is an unacceptable service activity. In
addition, Corporation funds may not be used to conduct a voter registration drive.
j. Other activities as the Corporation determines will be prohibited, upon notice to the
Grantee.
Individuals may exercise their rights as private citizens and may participate in the above
activities on their initiative, on non-AmeriCorps time, and using non-Corporation funds. The
AmeriCorps logo should not be worn while doing so.
5. FUND RAISING.
a. Members. A member's service activities may not include organized fund raising,
including financial campaigns, endowment drives, solicitation of gifts and bequests, and
similar activities designed for the sole purpose of raising capital or obtaining
contributions for the organization.
Service activities that raise funds or in-kind contributions while generating, involving
and/or encouraging community support may be appropriate and allowable, such as serve-
a-thons, to the extent they are in direct and immediate support of an approved objective
of the Program and provided that they are not the Program's primary activity or involve
significant amounts of an individual member's time.
Prohibited activities for members include preparing grant proposals, performing fund
raising activities to help the Grantee achieve its matching requirements or to support an
organization's general operating expenses, and providing fund raising assistance to other
community-based organizations that do not provide immediate and direct support to a
Grantee's approved Program objective.
FINIAL-JUNE.2002 9
b. Staff. An AmeriCorps staff member's time and related expenses may not be charged to
the Corporation or Grantee share of the Grant while engaged in organized fund raising,
including financial campaigns, endowment drives, the general solicitation of gifts and
bequests, door-to-door solicitations, direct mail, or similar activities for which the sole
purpose is raising capital or obtaining contributions for the organization. Expenses
incurred to raise funds may be paid out of the funds raised. Development officers and
fund-raising staff are not allowable expenses.
Staff time and effort spent on raising the match requirements should be incidental to the
overall management of the Program, and should be focused primarily on developing and
disseminating information to potential funders on the AmeriCorps Program and its
achievements. Staff can make presentations and educate funders on objectives, goals and
accomplishments. Efforts to involve the community in support of the AmeriCorps
program, such as obtaining medical contributions or assistance at a health fair; donations
of building supplies for an AmeriCorps construction project; and coordinating
community participation in and support of a serve-a-thon and service activities are also
allowable.
6. ELIGIBILITY, RECRUITMENT,AND SELECTION.
a. Eligibility to Enroll. The Grantee may select as AmeriCorps members only those
individuals who are eligible to enroll in AmeriCorps. In order to be eligible, an
individual must meet the statutory requirements in sections ii- iv of the definition of a
member(Definitions, letter i). The Grantee is responsible for obtaining and maintaining
adequate documentation to demonstrate the eligibility of members.
b. Recruitment:
i. Community Recruitment. The Grantee must seek to recruit Program members
from the community in which the project is conducted, as well as members of
diverse races, ethnicities, genders, ages, socioeconomic backgrounds, education
levels, and mental and physical capabilities, unless and to the extent that the
approved Program design requires emphasizing the recruitment of staff and
members who share a specific characteristic or background. In no case may a
Grantee violate the non-discrimination and non-displacement rules governing
member selection.
ii. National Recruitment. To supplement local recruitment efforts, the Grantee is
encouraged to request referrals of eligible individuals through the Corporation's
national recruitment database and the various State Commissions' recruitment
systems. Grantees may be asked to consider qualified individuals on the database,
but will not be required to select anyone. Prospective AmeriCorps members may
access the national recruitment database through the Corporation's toll-free
number, 1-800-94-ACORP/1-800-942-2677 (voice), or 1-800-833-3722 (TDD),
or through the Corporation's website at www.nationalservice.org.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 10
c. Selection. The Grantee is responsible for establishing the minimum qualifications for
membership in the Program, selecting members who meet those qualifications, and
assigning members to projects that are appropriate to their skill levels. The Grantee must
select members in a fair, non-partisan, non-political and non-discriminatory manner,
without regard to the member's need for reasonable accommodation of a disability or
child care, without displacing paid employees, and in accordance with its approved
application. The Grantee is encouraged to select members who possess a commitment to
the goals of AmeriCorps.
d. Reasonable Accommodation. Programs and activities must be accessible to persons
with disabilities, and the Grantee must provide reasonable accommodation to the known
mental or physical disabilities of otherwise qualified members, service recipients,
applicants, and program staff. All selections and project assignments must be made
without regard to the need to provide reasonable accommodation.
By far, the vast majority of accommodations are inexpensive. For those limited cases
where reasonable accommodations are more costly, there is a limited amount of money
available through State Commissions to provide accommodations for service members.
By statute, only Subtitle C competitive State and National Direct AmeriCorps Programs
may use these funds. The President's Committee on Employment of People with
Disabilities operates a toll-free, confidential, free resource for employers on reasonable
accommodation requirements and options for accommodating employees at(800) 526-
7234 (voice/TDD), e-mail at JAN(ci'ijan.icdi.wvu.edu, or website at www.pcepd.gov.
Accommodations that impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the
operation of the program or fundamentally alter its nature are not reasonable
accommodations. However, the Grantee must document and prove any undue burden.
Similarly, a person who poses a direct threat to the health or safety to himself or herself
or to others, where the threat cannot be eliminated by reasonable accommodation, is not a
qualified individual with a disability. In such instances the Grantee must document and
prove the direct threat.
e. Level of Participation. The Grantee must seek to enroll the number of full-time and less
than full-time members agreed upon in its approved application. A Program should make
every effort to enroll members so that each member has a reasonable expectation of
completing his/her term of service by the end of the Program's project period. Should a
Program not be renewed, a member who was scheduled to continue in a term of service
either may be placed in another Program where feasible, or a member can receive a pro-
rated education award if the member has completed at least 15% of the service hour
requirement.
f. Member Classification. AmeriCorps members are not employees of the Program or of
the federal government. The definition of"participant" in the National and Community
Service Act of 1990 as amended applies to AmeriCorps members. As such. "a
participant (member) shall not be considered to be an employee of the Program in which
the participant (member) is enrolled" (42 U.S.C. 1251 1(17)(B)). Moreover, members are
FINAL-JUNE.2002 11
not allowed to perform an employee's duties or otherwise displace employees.
For the limited purposes of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, the member may
be considered an eligible employee of the project sponsor. The Family and Medical
Leave Act's requirements as they apply to AmeriCorps Programs are contained in 45
C.F.R. 2540.220(b). Generally, this Act will apply only to second term members.
g. Parental Consent. Before enrolling in a Program, individuals under eighteen years of
age must provide written consent from a parent or legal guardian.
h. Criminal Record Checks. Programs with members or employees who have substantial
direct contact with children(as defined by state law) or who perform service in the homes
of children or individuals considered vulnerable by the program, shall, to the extent
permitted by state and local law, conduct criminal record checks on these members or
employees as part of the screening process. This documentation must be maintained
consistent with state law.
i. Criminal Charges. An AmeriCorps member who is officially charged with a violent
felony, or with the sale or distribution of a controlled substance during a term of service
will have his/her service suspended without a living allowance and without receiving
credit for hours missed. The member may be reinstated into AmeriCorps service if
he/she is found not guilty or if the charge is dismissed. If an AmeriCorps member who
has been cleared of such charges is unable to complete his/her term of service within one
year, he/she may accept a pro-rated education award as long as he/she has completed at
least 15% (255 hours full-time/135 hours less than full-time) of his/her service.
An AmeriCorps member who is convicted of a criminal charge as described above must
be terminated for cause from the program, and he/she is not eligible for any portion of an
education award.
7. TRAINING, SUPERVISION AND SUPPORT.
a. Planning for the Term of Service. The Grantee must develop member position
descriptions that provide for direct and meaningful service activities and performance
criteria that are appropriate to the skill level of members. Member activities may not
include clerical work, research, or fund raising. activities unless such activities are
incidental to the member's direct service activities. The Grantee must ensure that each
member has sufficient opportunity to complete the required number of hours to qualify
for a post-service education award. In planning for the member's term of service, the
Grantee must account for holidays and other time off, and must provide each member
with sufficient opportunity to make up missed hours.
b. Member Contracts. The Grantee must require that members sign contracts that, at a
minimum, stipulate the following:
FINAL-JUNE.2002 12
i. The minimum number of service hours and other requirements (as developed by
the Program) necessary to successfully complete the term of service and to be
eligible for the education award;
ii. Acceptable conduct;
iii. Prohibited activities;
iv. Requirements under the Drug-Free Workplace Act(41 U.S.C. 701 et seq.);
v. Suspension and termination rules;
vi. The specific circumstances under which a member may be released for cause;
vii. The position description;
viii. Grievance procedures; and
ix. Other requirements as established by the Program.
c. Training. Consistent with the approved budget, the Grantee must provide members with
the training, skills, knowledge and supervision necessary to perform the tasks required in
their assigned project positions, including specific training in a particular field and
background information on the community served.
The Grantee must conduct an orientation for members and comply with any pre-service
orientation or training required by the Corporation. This orientation should be designed
to enhance member security and sensitivity to the community. Orientation should cover
member rights and responsibilities, including the Program's code of conduct, prohibited
activities, requirements under the Drug-Free Workplace Act (41 U.S.C. 701 et seq.),
suspension and termination from service, grievance procedures, sexual harassment, other
non-discrimination issues, and other topics as necessary.
d. Service-Learning. The Grantee agrees to use service experiences to help members
achieve the skills and education needed for productive, active citizenship, including the
provision, if appropriate, of structured opportunities for members to reflect on their
service experiences.
e. Limit on Education and Training Activities. No more than 20% of the aggregate of
all AmeriCorps member service hours in a Program may be spent in education, training
or other non-direct activities.
f. Supervision. The Grantee must provide members with adequate supervision by
qualified supervisors in accordance with the approved application. The Grantee must
establish and enforce a code of conduct for members.
g. Performance Reviews. The Grantee must conduct and keep a record of at least a mid-
term and end-of-term written evaluation of each member's performance, focusing on such
factors as:
i. Whether the member has completed the required number of hours;
ii. Whether the member has satisfactorily completed assignments; and
iii. Whether the member has met other performance criteria that were clearly
communicated at the beginning of the term of service.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 13
h. Support Services. The Grantee must provide specific support services to members who
are school dropouts by assisting them in earning the equivalent of a high school diploma;
and to members who are completing a term of service and are making the transition to
other education and career opportunities.
i. Registration to Vote. The Grantee should encourage all eligible members to register and
vote. However, the Grantee is prohibited from requiring members to register or to vote,
and from attempting to influence how members vote. Members who are unable to vote
before or after service hours should be allowed to do so during their service time without
incurring any penalties. The site director should determine the length of absence.
j. Jury Duty. The Grantee must allow AmeriCorps members to serve on a jury without
being penalized for doing so. During the time AmeriCorps members serve as jurors, they
should continue to receive credit for their normal service hours, a living allowance, health
care coverage and, if applicable, child care coverage regardless of any reimbursements
for incidental expenses received from the court.
k. Member Injury. The Grantee must report any serious injuries to the appropriate
Corporation Program Officer immediately.
FINAL-JU E,2002 14
1. Armed Forces Reserves. Generally, the Reserves of the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air
Force, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Coast Guard, the Army National Guard and the Air
National Guard require reservists to serve one weekend a month plus 12 to I5 days a year
(hereafter referred to as the two-week active duty service).
To the extent possible, grantees should seek to minimize the disruption in members'
AmeriCorps service as a result of discharging responsibilities related to their reservist
duties. If members have a choice of when to fulfill their annual two-week active duty
requirement, they should do so when it will not disrupt their AmeriCorps service. In
instances where the dates of active duty are inflexible and conflict with AmeriCorps
service, members should be granted a leave of absence for the two-week period of active
duty service in the Reserves. Members may not receive time-off for additional Reserves-
related service beyond the two-week active duty service. No AmeriCorps service credit is
earned for the once-a-month weekend service in the Reserves.
Grantees should credit members for AmeriCorps service hours during their two weeks of
active duty service in the Reserves if it occurs during their AmeriCorps service. The
member would receive credit for the number of hours he or she would have served during
that period had there been no interruption. For example, if a full-time member is signed
up to serve 30 hours of AmeriCorps service one week and 40 hours of AmeriCorps
service on the following week, she or he would receive 70 hours of AmeriCorps service
credit for the two weeks of active duty service regardless of the actual number of hours
served in the Reserves.
Reservists in the U.S. Armed Forces receive compensation for their mandatory two-
weeks of active duty service. The compensation regulations governing the Army and Air
National Guard may vary by state.
Grantees should continue to pay the living allowance and provide health care and child
care coverage for the two-week period of active duty.
8. TERMS OF SERVICE.
a. Program Requirements. Each Program must, at the start of the term of service,
establish the guidelines and definitions for the successful completion of the Program
year, ensuring that these Program requirements meet the Corporation's service hour
requirements as defined below:
i. Full-Time Members. Members must serve at least 1700 hours during a period
of not less than nine months and not more than one year.
ii. Half-Time Members. Half-time members must serve at Ieast 900 hours during a
period of one or two years as indicated in the approved budget.
iii. Reduced Half-Time Members. Reduced half-time members must serve at least
675 hours over a time not to exceed one year.
iv. Ouarter-Time Members. Ouarter-time members must serve at least 450 hours
over a time not to exceed one year.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 15
v. Minimum Time Members. Minimum time members must serve at least 300
hours over a time not to exceed one year.
b. Service in a Second or Subsequent Term.
i. General. A grantee is under no obligation to enroll a member for a second or
subsequent term of service. In addition, there may be limitations on an
individual's eligibility for federally-funded member benefits for any term beyond
a second term.
ii. Satisfactory Performance Review. To be eligible to serve a second or
subsequent term of service, a member must receive a satisfactory performance
review for any prior term of service.
iii. No Automatic Disqualification if Released for Cause. A release for cause
covers all circumstances in which a member does not successfully complete a
term of service for reasons other than compelling personal circumstances.
Therefore, it is possible for a member to receive a satisfactory performance
review and be released for cause. For example, a member who is released for
cause for a first term for personal reasons —e.g. he has decided to take a job offer
—but who, otherwise, was performing well up until the time he decided to leave
would not be disqualified for a second term as long as he received a satisfactory
performance evaluation for the period he served.
iv. Required Disclosure by Member of Prior Release for Cause. Any individual
released for cause who thereafter applies to serve in any AmeriCorps program
must disclose the fact that he or she was released for cause to the Program to
which the individual is applying. Failure to disclose that the individual was
released for cause from another AmeriCorps Program will make the individual
ineligible to receive the AmeriCorps education award.
c. Notice to the Corporation's National Service Trust. The Grantee must notify the
Corporation's National Service Trust within 30 days in writing upon a member's
enrollment in, completion of, lengthy or indefinite suspension from, or release from, a
term of service. Lengthy or indefinite suspension of service is defined as any extended
period during which the member is not serving service hours or receiving AmeriCorps
benefits because it is unclear when the member might return to the Program. The
Grantee also must notify the Trust when a change in a member's status is approved and
changed(i.e. from full-time to less than full-time or vice versa). Failure to report such
changes within 30 days may result in sanctions to the Grantee up to, and including
suspension or termination. Grantees or sub-grantees properly utilizing WBRS meet
notification requirements for member enrollment, changes of status and exits when they
use that system to inform the Corporation within the approved time frames. Any
questions regarding the Trust may be directed to (202) 606-5000 ext. 347.
d. Notice to Child Care and Health Care Providers. The Grantee must notify the
Corporation's designated agents immediately in writing when a member's status changes
such that it would affect eligibility for child care or health care. Examples of changes in
status are converting a full-time member to less than full-time member, terminating or
releasing members from service, and suspending members for cause for lengthy or
FINAL-JUNE,2002 16
indefinite time periods. Program directors should contact AmeriCorps®Care at 1-800-
570-4543 on child care related changes, and their health insurance provider about health
insurance related changes.
e. Changing Member Status. Circumstances may arise within a program that necessitate
converting full time members to less than full time or vice versa. The following
distinguishes between converting unfilled AmeriCorps member positions and converting
currently enrolled members from their enrolled status. Note that once a member is given
a partial education award, the remaining portion of that education award is not available
for use.
Any change of member status that 1) necessitates a change in the number of full-time
equivalent positions in the grant, or 2) requires an increase or decrease in the funding
amount of the Grant requires prior written approval from the Corporation's Office of
Grants Management.
i. Unfilled Positions. State Commissions and Parent Organizations are hereby
delegated authority to approve or authorize the conversion of unfilled full-time
member positions to less than full time within the following parameters. The
number of unfilled positions that may be converted may not exceed 20% of the
Parent Organization's or specific State Commission Program's awarded full-time
equivalent positions or 10 full-time equivalent positions, whichever is greater.
For example, if a Parent Organization or specific State Commission Program was
awarded 40 full-time equivalent positions, no more than 10 (the greater of 8 and
10) full-time equivalent positions may be converted for the program. If a Parent
Organization or specific State Commission Program was awarded 100 full-time
equivalent positions, no more than 20 (the greater of 20 and 10) full-time
equivalent positions may be converted. When positions are converted, the
number of full-time equivalents must remain the same within each program to
maintain the equivalent estimated cost per member. In other words, if you want
to replace 1 full-time unfilled member position, you must establish 2 half-time
900 hour positions.
Changes that exceed the limits stated above must be approved in advance by the
AmeriCorps Program Office.
Conversely, unfilled less than full-time positions may be converted to full-time
positions within the aforementioned constraints pertaining to number and
percentage limitations, number of full-time equivalents, education awards
provided, and available funds.
ii. Enrolled Members.
(a) Full-time. State Commissions and Parent Organizations may authorize or
approve occasional changes of currently enrolled full-time members to less
than full-time members within the first three months of the member's service
and within the constraints defined above in section e.i. Impact on program
quality should be factored into approval of requests. The Corporation will
FINAL-JUNE,2002 17
not cover health care or child care costs for less than full-time members,
therefore appropriate adjustments must be made. It is not allowable to
transfer currently enrolled full-time members to a less than full-time status
simply to provide a less than full-time education award. A Change of Status
form must be completed and forwarded to the Corporation within 30 days.
(b) Less than Full-time. Converting less than full-time members to full-time is
discouraged because it is very difficult to facilitate, unless done very early in
the member's term of service. State Commissions and Parent Organizations
may authorize or approve such changes so long as they are within the first
three months of the member's service, and the current budget can
accommodate such changes. Programs must keep in mind that a member's
minimum 1700 hours must be completed within 12 months of the member's
original start date. A Change of Status form must be completed and
forwarded to the Corporation within 30 days.
State Commissions and Parent Organizations must forward all changes and
appropriate forms to the Corporation after approval. Any requests for changes
that fall outside of the parameters set forth above must come to the
Corporation for written approval with concurrence from the State Commission
or Parent Organization.
9. RELEASE FROM PARTICIPATION.
Grantees may release members from participation for two reasons: (1) for compelling personal
circumstances; and(2) for cause in accordance with 45 C.F.R. 2522.230.
a. Compelling Circumstances. The Grantee is responsible for determining whether a
member's personal circumstances are sufficiently compelling to justify release on this
basis. If a Grantee releases a member for compelling personal circumstances, the
Grantee may elect either to authorize a pro-rated education award or temporarily to
suspend service for up to two years. If a term of service is temporarily suspended, the
member will not accrue service hours or receive benefits during this time period. In order
to be eligible for a pro-rated education award, a member must have served a minimum of
15% of his or her term of service. If a Grantee releases a member on the grounds that an
accommodation of a disability would impose an undue burden, the Grantee must
document its determination and notify the Corporation. Such circumstances are to be
considered "compelling" for purposes of this sub-clause. The Corporation for National
Service allows each program to decide on a case-by-case basis whether the situation
warrants a member receiving a partial award. However, the Corporation's policy is that
generally the compelling circumstance must be beyond the member's control.
Compelling personal circumstances include those that are beyond the member's control,
such as, but not limited to:
• A member's disability or serious illness;
FINAL-JUNE.2002 18
• Disability, serious illness or death of a member's family member if this makes
completing a term unreasonably difficult or impossible; or
• Conditions attributable to the program or otherwise unforeseeable and beyond the
member's control, such as a natural disaster, a strike,relocation of a spouse, or the
nonrenewal or premature closing of a project or program, that make completing a
term unreasonably difficult or impossible.
Compelling personal circumstances also include those that the Corporation has, for public
policy reasons, determined as such, including:
• Military service obligations;
• Acceptance by a member of an opportunity to make the transition from welfare to
work; or
• Acceptance of an employment opportunity by a member serving in a program that
includes in its approved objectives the promotion of employment among its members.
If a member leaves AmeriCorps service for any of the reasons noted above and the
Grantee or Sub-Grantee determines that the member has served at least 15% of his or her
service (or 255 hours for full-time service), the member is eligible for a portion of the
education award corresponding to the period served.
Compelling personal circumstances do not include leaving a program:
• To enroll in school;
• To obtain employment, other than in moving from a welfare to work or in leaving a
program that includes in its approved objectives the promotion of employment among
its members; or
• Because of dissatisfaction with the program.
If the member resigns for any of these reasons or other reasons that are within his or her
control, the individual should receive no portion of the AmeriCorps education award.
The member has the primary responsibility for demonstrating that compelling personal
circumstances prevent the member from completing the term of service.
Grantees must make these determinations based on these criteria and indicate the reasons
for early termination on the End of Term of Service forms.
b. For Cause. A release for cause encompasses any circumstances other than compelling
personal circumstances that warrant a member's release from completing a term of
service. The Grantee may release a member for cause according to the conditions of the
Corporation and the member's contract. A Grantee must release a member for cause if
the member is convicted of a violent felony or the sale or distribution of a controlled
substance during a term of service. If the member is charged with a violent felony or the
sale or distribution of a controlled substance, or convicted of the possession of a
controlled substance, the Grantee must suspend the member without any AmeriCorps
benefits, including living allowance, and without receiving credit for hours missed. Any
member who drops out of a Program without obtaining a release for compelling personal
circumstances is considered to have been released for cause. A member released for
FINAL-JUNE,2002 19
cause may not receive any portion of an education award. A member wrongly released or
suspended for cause will receive credit for any service missed and reimbursement for
missed living allowances as specified in 45 C.F.R. 2522.230. Members are not eligible
to receive any benefits or service hour credit upon release from service for cause.
c. Resumption of Service. Any member whose service was suspended because of being
charged with a violent felony or sale or distribution of a controlled substance may be
reinstated to service if the member is found not guilty or if the charge is dismissed. Any
member whose service was suspended because of being convicted of a first offense of
possession of a controlled substance may resume service by demonstrating that the
member has enrolled in an approved drug rehabilitation Program. A member convicted
of a second or third offense of possession of a controlled substance may resume service
by demonstrating successful completion of a rehabilitation program.
10. MINOR DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS.
The Grantee may temporarily suspend or impose a fine on a member for minor disciplinary
reasons, such as chronic tardiness, as outlined in the conditions of the member contract.
a. Temporary Suspension of Service. The period of suspension does not count toward a
member's required service hours. Further, members who are suspended for minor
disciplinary reasons may not receive a living allowance for the suspension period.
b. Fines. If determined to be necessary for improvements in member performance or
attendance, the Grantee may impose a reasonable fine on members for minor disciplinary
problems consistent with the member contract. The fines may not be calculated on an
hourly basis. For example, a member who is an hour late may not be fined an hour's
worth of living allowance. Instead, the Grantee shall establish a written policy on fines,
which is not linked to an hourly rate.
The Grantee may deduct fines from that portion of the member's living allowance that is
paid by non-Federal funds. Before making any deductions, the Grantee should consider
how this might affect the status of members under employment laws, including minimum
wage and unemployment compensation. Further, a Grantee that deducts in this fashion
may be required to provide additional matching funds.
11. LIVING ALLOWANCES, OTHER IN-SERVICE BENEFITS AND TAXES.
The living allowance match must come from non-federal sources,unless an exception for lack of
available financial resources at the local level under 42 U.S.C. 12594 (g) is specifically approved
in Section VII. Special Conditions of the Award document. Programs that want to provide a
living allowance in excess of the minimum amount stated in the Application Guidelines must
provide a Grantee match for all funds over 85% of that minimum.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 20
a. Living Allowances. Unless otherwise agreed upon, a Grantee must provide a living
allowance to full-time members in accord with the following:
i. Full-Time Requirements. Please refer to the Application Guidelines for current
year amounts. The living allowance is based on the total average annual amount
provided to VISTA volunteers. The Corporation will only fund up to 85% of the
minimum living allowance. A minimum of 15% must be matched by non-federal
sources. A program that wants to provide a living allowance in excess of the
stated minimum must provide a Grantee match for all funds over 85% of that
stated amount. If the program is permitted to provide a living allowance that is
less than the stated minimum, the Corporation will only fund 85% of the actual
amount.
ii. Less than full-time Requirements. Programs are not required to pay less than
full-time members living allowances. If a Program chooses to pay less than full-
time members, it should prorate the full-time living allowance based on the less
than full-time member's service. The Corporation will fund up to 85% of the pro-
rated living allowance.
iii. Other Requirements. Programs may not provide a living allowance benefit
above the maximum amount stated in the Application Guidelines for full-time
members unless permitted under 42 U.S.C. 12594(c), or pro-rated based on
number of hours for less than full-time. Programs in existence prior to September
21, 1993 may offer a lower living allowance than the stated minimum; however,
Corporation funds will only support 85% of the actual amount.
b. Living Allowance Distribution. The living allowance is designed to help members meet
the necessary living expenses incurred while participating in the AmeriCorps Program.
Programs must not pay a living allowance on an hourly basis. It is not a wage and should
not fluctuate based on the number of hours members serve in a given time period.
Programs should pay the living allowance in increments, such as weekly or bi-weekly.
Programs may use their organization's payroll system to process members' living
allowances. However, if a payroll system cannot be altered and must show 40 hours in
order to distribute a living allowance, then members' service hours should be documented
separately to keep track of their progress towards the Program's total required
AmeriCorps service hours.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 21
c. Waiving the Living Allowance. A member may waive all or part of the payment of a
living allowance if he or she believes his or her public assistance may be lost because of
the living allowance, with the following caveats:
i. Even if a member waives his or her right to receive the living allowance, it is
possible—depending on the specific public assistance program rules—that the
amount of the living allowance that the member is eligible to receive will be
deemed available;
ii. Members may revoke the waiver at any time during the course of the program;
iii. If a member revokes the waiver, he or she may begin receiving the living
allowance only from the date on which the waiver was revoked; the member may
not receive any portion of the living allowance that accrued during the waiver
period.
d. Taxes and Insurance.
i. Liability Insurance. The Grantee must have adequate general liability coverage
for the organization, employees and members, including coverage of members
engaged in on- and off-site project activities.
ii. FICA (Social Security and Medicare taxes). Unless the Grantee obtains a
ruling from the Social Security Administration or the Internal Revenue Service
that specifically exempts its AmeriCorps members from FICA requirements, the
Grantee must pay FICA for any member receiving a living allowance. The
Grantee also must withhold 7.65% from the member's living allowance.
iii. Income Taxes. The Grantee must withhold Federal personal income taxes from
member living allowances, requiring each member to complete a W-4 form at the
beginning of the term of service and providing a W-2 form at the close of the tax
year. The Grantee must comply with any applicable state or local tax
requirements.
iv. Unemployment Insurance. The U.S. Department of Labor ruled on April 20,
1995 that federal unemployment compensation law does not require coverage for
members because no employer-employee relationship exists. The Grantee cannot
charge the cost of unemployment insurance taxes to the Grant unless mandated by
state law. Programs are responsible for determining the requirements of state law
by consulting their State Commission, legal counsel or the applicable state
agency. AmeriCorps*National and AmeriCorps*Tribes and Territories Grantees
must coordinate with their State Commissions to determine a consistent state
treatment of unemployment insurance requirements.
v. Worker's Compensation. Worker's Compensation is an allowable cost to the
Grant. The Grantee is responsible for determining whether state law requires the
provision of worker's compensation for members. If a Program is not required by
state law to provide worker's compensation, the Program must obtain
Occupational Accidental Death and Dismemberment insurance coverage for
members to cover in-service injury or incidents.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 22
e. Health Care Coverage.The Grantee must provide a health care policy to those full-time
members not otherwise covered by a health care policy at the time of enrollment into the
AmeriCorps program, or to those members who lose coverage during their term of
service as a result of participating in the Program or through no deliberate act of their
own. The Corporation will not cover health care costs for family members or for less
than full-time members.
i. Minimum Benefits. The health care policy must meet the following minimum
benefits:
• Physician services for illness or injury;
• Hospital room and board;
• Emergency room;
• X-ray and laboratory;
• Prescription drugs;
• Limited mental/nervous disorders;
• Limited substance abuse coverage;
• An annual deductible of no more than $250 charges per member;
• No more than$1,000 total annual out-of-pocket per member;
• A 20% co-pay or a comparable fixed fee with the exception of a 50% co-pay
for mental and substance abuse care; and
• A maximum benefit of$50,000.
ii. Obtaining Health Care Coverage. You may obtain health care insurance for
your members through any provider you choose, as long as the policy provides
the minimum benefits and is not excessive in cost. If you use a health care policy
that charges more than$150 per month to the Corporation you must send a copy
of the policy along with a summary of its coverage and costs to the Corporation's
Office of Grants Management.
iii. Half-Time Members. Although no portion of health insurance expenses for half-
time members may be paid from Corporation funds,you may choose to provide
health care to half-time members from other sources.
iv. Half-Time Members Serving in a Full-Time Capacity. Half-time members
who are serving in a full-time capacity for a sustained period of time (such as a
full-time summer project) may be eligible for health care benefits supported with
Corporation funds, although that coverage must be approved in the Grant.
f. Child Care. The Grantee must ensure that child care is made available to those full-time
members who need such assistance in order to participate. Members are not eligible to
receive child care from AmeriCorps while they are receiving child care subsidies from
another source for the same period of AmeriCorps Service.
i. Member Eligibility. A member is considered to need child care in order to
participate in the Program if:
(a) He or she is the parent or legal guardian (or acting in loco parentis) for a child
under the age of 13 who resides with the member;
(b) He or she has a family income that does not exceed the state's income
eligibility guidelines for a family of the same size. At a maximum, family
income can be no more than 75% of the state's median income; and
FINAL-JUNE,2002 23
(c) At the time of acceptance into the Program, he or she is not receiving child
care from another available source that would continue to be provided while
the member serves in the program.
ii. Qualified Providers. To be eligible for payment with AmeriCorps funds, a child
care provider must qualify under the Child Care and Development Block Grant
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9858c(4)(A)). Each state has its own criteria. Payments
will not be made to ineligible providers.
iii. Administration of Child Care Payments. In general, the Corporation will
provide for child care payments, which will be administered through the National
Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies (NACCRRA),
hereafter referred to as AmeriCorps®CARE. Grantees that choose to provide
child care as a match source (as approved in their budget) may use
AmeriCorps®CARE for technical assistance. Grantees can contact
AmeriCorps®CARE at 1-800-570-4543 with questions regarding child care.
iv. Program Director's Responsibilities. In addition to determining a member's
eligibility at the start of the term of service, Program directors are required to
notify AmeriCorps®CARE immediately in writing when:
(a) A member is no longer eligible for child care benefits due to a change in the
member's eligibility status (e.g., family income exceeds the limit, the child
turns 13, a full-time member becomes a less than full-time member, or a
member leaves the Program);
(b) New or existing members become eligible for child care benefits;
(c) A member wishes to change child care providers or a child care provider will
no longer provide child care services; or
(d) A member is absent from the Program for excessive periods of time (five or
more days in a month).
Costs incurred due to the Grantee's failure to keep AmeriCorps®CARE
immediately informed of changes in a member's status may be charged to the
Grantee's organization.
v. Half-Time Members. Although no portion of child care expenses for half-time
members may be paid from Corporation funds, Programs may choose to provide
child care to half-time members from other sources.
vi. Half-Time Members Serving in a Full-Time Capacity. Half-time members
who are serving in a full-time capacity for a sustained period of time (such as a
full-time summer project) may be eligible for child care benefits supported with
Corporation funds, although that coverage must be approved in the Grant or via
prior written approval from the Corporation's Office of Grants Management.
vii. Payments. Payments or reimbursement for child care benefits will be made for
eligible members to qualified providers from the date child care need was
established after service began. No payments and reimbursements will be made
in the event the AmeriCorps member was ineligible, or if the provider was not
qualified under the state guidelines.
g. Family and Medical Leave. AmeriCorps members who have served for at least 12
months and 1250 hours can take family and medical leave in accordance with the Family
and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). provided the sponsoring institution, if non-
FINAL-JUNE,2002 24
federal, employs staff of more than 50 people. (See the Corporation's Regulations at 45
C.F.R. 2540.220) Under FMLA, members may take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave
during a 12 month period for the following reasons:
i. The birth of a child;
ii. The placement of a child with an AmeriCorps member through adoption or foster
care;
iii. Serious illness of an AmeriCorps member's spouse, child or parent; or
iv. Serious illness prevents the AmeriCorps member from performing his or her
essential service duties. According to Corporation regulations, a serious health
condition is an illness requiring in-patient care or continuing treatment by a health
care provider.
The grantee also may allow a member to take intermittent leave or reduce his or her
service hours for any of the reasons mentioned above.
Grantees may continue to provide health care coverage to members on family and
medical leave. If at the end of the leave, a member decides not to rejoin the program,
FMLA allows grantees to recover their health premium payments,unless the reason for
not returning is the continuation of the serious health condition or other circumstances
beyond the member's control. However, given the small amounts involved(in most cases
less than$300 per AmeriCorps member), Grantees may elect not to adopt this recovery
policy.
Family and medical leave does not count toward the requisite service hours and members
may not receive a living allowance during this period.
In the Grantee's discretion, temporary leave may also be authorized for the reasons
allowed under FMLA to AmeriCorps members who do not otherwise meet the eligibility
requirements for FMLA leave as described above. If temporary leave is appropriate,
grantees have the flexibility to determine the duration of the absence for up to 12 weeks.
The length of the leave must be based on two considerations: (1) the circumstances of
the situation; and (2) the impact of the absence on the member's service experience and
on the overall program. If the disruption would seriously compromise the member's
service experience or the quality of the program as a whole, then the grantee may offer
the member the option of rejoining the program in the next class or completely
withdrawing from the program.
h. Federal Work Study. Upon approval by the Corporation's Program Office, Work Study
students may be enrolled as AmeriCorps members. AmeriCorps member benefits are
reserved to those individuals who enroll in an AmeriCorps position in a program that has
been approved by the Corporation. Except as required by Federal Work Study
regulations, AmeriCorps members may not be paid on an hourly basis.
Federal Work Study funds are treated as any other federal funds and do not change
Grantee matching requirements.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 25
12. POST-SERVICE EDUCATION AWARDS.
In order for a member to receive a post-service education award from the National Service Trust,
the Grantee must certify to the National Service Trust that the member is eligible to receive the
education benefit. The Grantee must notify the National Service Trust on a form provided by the
Corporation(electronic submission via WBRS suffices) when it enrolls a member for a term of
service, when the member completes the term, and whenever there is a change in the member's
status during the term (e.g., release for compelling circumstances or suspension). A member
may receive a post-service education award only for the first two terms of service. For example,
one full-time and one half-time term of service count as two terms. If a member is released for
reasons other than misconduct prior to completing 15% of a term of service, that term does not
count as one of the two terms for which an education award may be provided. No Corporation
or other federal funds may be used to provide member support costs for a third or subsequent
term of service in an AmeriCorps State or National Program.
In order to receive a full education award, a member must perform the minimum hours of service
as required by the Corporation and successfully complete the program requirements as defined
by the Program. For example, if successful completion of a full-time program requires 1,800
service hours, members in that particular program are not eligible for an education award simply
upon completion of 1,700 hours.
If a member is released from a Program for compelling personal circumstances, the member is
eligible for a pro-rated education award based on the number of hours served, if it is at least 15%
of the total required hours. Questions regarding authorized uses of the education award should be
directed to the Trust at (202) 606-5000 ext. 347.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 26
Education Awards Table
Title Number of Hours Education Award
Full-time At least 1700 $4,725.00
One Year Half-time At least 900 $2,362.50
Two Year Half-time At least 900 $2,362.50
Reduced Half-time At least 675 $1,800.00
Quarter-time At least 450 $1,250.00
Minimum-time At least 300 $1,000.00
13. MATCHING REQUIREMENTS.
a. Matching Obligation. The Grantee must provide and account for the matching funds as
agreed upon in the approved application and budget. All programs are encouraged to
raise some funds from the private sector, i.e. non-federal funds.
The Corporation requires, at a minimum, the following aggregate matches:
i. Member Support Costs : 15% �y
including Living Allowance, FICA, Unemployment Insurance, Worker's
Compensation and Health Care
ii. Program Operating Costs: 33%
including Other Member Costs, Staff, Operating Costs, Internal Evaluation and
Administration
For further requirements, refer to OMB Circular A-102 and its implementation regulation
(45 C.F.R. 2543) or A-110 (45 C.F.R. 2541), as applicable.
b. Cash Match for Member Support Costs. The Grantee's matching contributions for
Member Support Costs (excluding health care) must be in non-federal monies, unless
otherwise authorized in accordance with AmeriCorps Special Provision 11, Living
Allowance. Tribal funds acquired through P.L. 93-638 are considered non-federal and
may be used to match Member Support Costs. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the
Corporation, programs must meet the grantee share of Member Support Costs, as
indicated in the approved budget, during each reporting period.
c. Cash or In-Kind Match for Program Operating Costs. Contributions, including cash
and third party in-kind, will be accepted as part of the Grantee's matching share for
Program Operating Costs (defined as those other than the Member Support Costs) when
such contributions meet all of the following criteria:
i. They are verifiable from Grantee records;
ii. They are not included as contributions for any other federally-assisted Program;
iii. They are necessary and reasonable for the proper and efficient accomplishment of
Program objectives; and
iv. They are allowable under applicable cost principles.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 27
d. Exception for Volunteer Community Service. Because the purpose of this Grant is to
enable and stimulate volunteer community service, the Grantee may not include the value
of direct community service performed by volunteers. However, the Grantee may include
the value of volunteer services contributed to the organization for organizational
functions such as accounting, audit, training of staff and AmeriCorps Programs.
e. Administrative Costs.Administrative costs cannot exceed 5% of total Corporation funds
actually expended. Administrative costs which exceed the Corporation's maximum
administrative cost limit of 5% but which otherwise would have been allocable to the
Grant, are allowable as the matching share under the Administrative costs budget line
item. See General Provisions, Clause 22, Administrative Costs.
f. valuation. The value of Grantee and third-party contributions of services and property
will be determined in accordance with applicable cost principles set forth in OMB
Circulars A-21, A-87 and A-122, and the approved budget.
g. Cost Share. The Corporation encourages private sector support over-and-above the
matching fund requirement. As a general rule, the Corporation will treat cash or in-kind
matching contribution that exceed the required minimum as cost-share. Grantees must
comply with the requirements of CFR 2543.23 in documenting cash and in-kind
contributions.
14. MEMBER RECORDS AND CONFIDENTIALITY.
a. Record-Keeping. The Grantee must maintain records specified in(b) below that
document each member's eligibility to serve pursuant to the member eligibility
requirements in the definitions section (clause A9) of these provisions. The records must
be sufficient to establish that the individual was eligible to participate in the Program and
that the member successfully completed the Program requirements.
b. Verification. To verify U.S. citizenship, U.S. national status or, U.S. lawful permanent
resident alien status, the Grantee must obtain and maintain documentation as required by
45 C.F.R. 2522.200(b) and (c). To verify age, the Grantee must obtain and maintain
documentation such as a driver's license, or birth certificate together with photo
identification, or other reliable documentation of age. To verify whether the member
meets the requirements relating to high-school education, the Grantee must obtain from
the member, and maintain in the member's file, a written declaration under penalty of law
that the member meets the requirements in clause A 9 of these provisions relating to high
school education. If the member has been determined to be incapable of obtaining a high
school diploma or its equivalent, the Grantee must retain a copy of the supporting
independent evaluation.
c. Confidential Member Information. The Grantee must maintain the confidentiality of
information regarding individual members. The Grantee must obtain the prior written
FINAL-JUNE,2002 28
consent of all members before using their names,photographs and other identifying
information for publicity, promotional or other purposes. Parental or legal guardian
consent must be obtained for members under 18 years of age. Grantees may include an
informed consent form as part of the member contract materials that are signed at the
time the member enrolls.
Grantees may release aggregate and other non-identifying information, and are required
to release member information to the Corporation and its designated contractors. The
Grantee must permit a member who submits a written request for access to review
records that pertain to the member and were created pursuant to this Grant.
15. BUDGET AND PROGRAMMATIC CHANGES.
a. Programmatic Changes. The State Commission or Parent Organization must obtain the
prior written approval of the AmeriCorps Program Office before making the following
changes in the approved Program:
i. Changes in the scope, objectives or goals of the Program, whether or not they
involve budgetary changes;
ii. Substantial changes in the level of participant supervision;
iii. Entering into additional sub-Grants or contracts for AmeriCorps activities funded
by the Grant but not identified or included in the approved application and grant
budget.
b. Budgetary Changes. The Grantee must obtain the prior written approval of the
Corporation's Office of Grants Management before deviating from the approved budget
in any of the following ways:
i. Reallocation of Funds from the "Member Support Cost" category to other
categories of the approved budget. However, the Grantee may reallocate funds
within the line items in this category, except for increases in health care cost per
member, which must be approved. The specific line items covered by this
subclause are:
(a) Living allowance,
(b) FICA, worker's compensation, and unemployment insurance and
(c) Health care (or alternative health care).
ii. Specific Costs Requiring Prior Approval Before Incurrence under OMB
Circulars A-21, A-87 or A-122. For certain cost items, the cost circulars require
approval of the awarding agency for the cost to be allowable. Examples of these
costs are overtime pay, rearrangement and alteration costs, and pre-award costs.
iii. Purchases of Equipment over $5,000 using Grant funds, unless specified in the
approved application and budget.
iv. Unless the Corporation share of the award is $100,000 or less, cumulative
amount budget line items that amount to 10 per cent or more of the total program
budget must be approved in writing in advance by the Corporation. The total
program budget includes both the Corporation and Grantee shares. Grantees may
transfer funds among approved direct cost categories when the cumulative amount
of such transfers does not exceed 10 per cent of the total program budget.
FINAL-JUNE,2002 29
c. Approvals of Programmatic and Budget Changes. The Corporation's Grants Officers
are the only officials who have the authority to change the requirements of the Grant.
The Grants Officers will execute written amendments, and Grantees should not assume
approvals have been granted unless documentation from the Grants Office has been
received.
16. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.
a. Financial Status and Progress Reports. Progress and Financial Status reporting
requirements in these Provisions apply only to the Grantee. Grantees are required to
review, analyze, and follow up on progress and financial status reports it receives from
AmeriCorps subgrantees or operating sites.
Note: Sub-Grantee Financial Status and Progress Reports
The Corporation expects each Grantee to set its own Sub-Grantee reporting
requirements. Grantees are responsible for monitoring Sub-Grantee activities and
training needs, tracking progress toward objectives, and identifying challenges.
Sub-Grantees must adhere to the reporting requirements outlined and
communicated by its Grantee for the program year.
Each Grantee must submit Progress and Financial Status Reports by the required due
dates. Requests for extensions of reporting deadlines will be granted when 1) the report
cannot be furnished in a timely manner for reasons legitimately beyond the control of the
grantee and 2) the Corporation receives a request explaining the need for an extension.
Extensions of deadlines for FSR's (SF 269a) may only be granted by the Office of Grants
Management, and extensions of deadlines for Progress Reports may only be granted by
the AmeriCorps Program Office.
i. Financial Status Reports. Financial Status Reports will be due April 30 for the
period ending March 31 and October 31 for the period ending September 30. A
Grantee properly utilizing WBRS meets financial reporting requirements when
the Grantee uses that system to submit reports within the approved time frames.
A Grantee must set its own submission deadlines for its respective Sub-Grantees.
ii. Progress Reports.
(a) Reporting Dates for National Direct Parent Organizations: A Grantee
Progress Report("GPR") is due in WBRS on December 2, 2003 for the period
October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003. The report will require the
Grantee's analysis of the AmeriCorps grants it administers. This includes
reporting on the operating sites that have completed their program year by the
reporting end date, as well as the progress to date for operating sites still in
operation for that project period.
(b) Reporting Dates for State Commissions,Tribes, and Territories: A
Grantee Progress Report ("GPR") is due in WBRS on December 2, 2003 for
the period October 1, 2002 through September 30, 2003. The report will
require the Grantee's analysis of the AmeriCorps grants it administers. This
includes reporting on Sub-Grantees that have completed their program year by
the reporting end date and the progress to date for those Sub-Grantees still in
operation for that project period.
iii. Final Progress Reports. A Grantee completing the final year of its grant must
submit, in addition to the GPR due December 2, a final Progress Report that is
FINAL-JUNE.2002 30
cumulative over the entire project period (three years). This progress report is due
within 90 days after the end of the grant.
iv. Final Financial Status Reports. A Grantee completing the final year of its grant
must submit, in lieu of the last semi-annual FSR, a final FSR that is cumulative
over the entire project period. This FSR is due within 90 days after the end of the
grant.
b. AmeriCorps Member-Related Forms. The Grantee is required to submit the following
documents to the National Service Trust at the Corporation on forms provided by the
Corporation. Grantees and Sub-Grantees may use WBRS to submit these forms
electronically. Programs using WBRS must also maintain hard copies of the forms:
i. Enrollment Forms. Enrollment forms must be submitted no later than 30 days after
a member is enrolled.
ii. Change of Status Forms. Member Change of Status Forms must be submitted no
later than 30 days after a member's status is changed. By forwarding Member
Change of Status Forms to the Corporation, State Commissions and Parent
Organizations signal their approval of the change.
iii. Exit/End-of-Term-of-Service Forms. Member Exit/End-of-Term-of-Service Forms
must be submitted no later than 30 days after a member exits the program or finishes
his/her term of service.
c. Benefit Provider Documentation. Programs are responsible for contacting applicable
benefit providers immediately and when a change of status affects the eligibility of a
member or when a member leaves the program early.
17. GRANT PERIOD AND INCREMENTAL FUNDING.
For the purpose of the Grant, a project period is the complete length of time the Grantee is
proposed to be funded to complete approved activities under the grant. A project period may
contain one or more budget periods. A budget period is a specific interval of time for which
Federal funds are being provided to fund a Grantee's approved activities and budget.
Unless otherwise specified, the Grant covers a three-year project period. In approving a multi-
year project period the Corporation makes an initial award for the first year of operation.
Additional funding is contingent upon satisfactory performance and the availability of funds.
The project period and the budget period are noted on the award document.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 31.
C. GENERAL PROVISIONS
18. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AUTHORITY.
This Grant is authorized by and subject to the National and Community Service Act of 1990 as
amended, codified as 42 U.S.C. 12501 et seq., and 45 C.F.R. 2510 et seq.
19. OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.
The following applicable federal cost principles, administrative requirements, and audit
requirements are incorporated by reference:
a. States, Indian Tribes, U.S. Territories, and Local Governments. The following
circulars and their implementing regulations apply to states, Indian tribes, U.S. territories,
and local governments:
i. Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to
State and Local Governments --45 C.F.R. 2541.
ii. OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.
iii. OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations.
b. Nonprofit Organizations. The following circulars and their implementing regulations
apply to nonprofit organizations:
i. Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Nonprofit Organizations --
45 C.F.R. 2543.
ii. OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for Nonprofit Organizations.
iii. OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations.
c. Educational Institutions. The following circulars and their implementing regulations
apply to educational institutions:
i. Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Nonprofit Organizations --
45 C.F.R. 2543.
ii. OMB Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.
iii. OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit
Organizations.
d. Other Applicable Statutes and Regulations. The Grantee must comply with all other
applicable statutes, executive orders, regulations and policies governing the Program,
including but not limited to those cited in these Grant Provisions, the Grant Assurances
and Certifications, and those cited in 45 C.F.R. Parts 2541 and 2543.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 32
20. RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER GRANT ADMINISTRATION.
a. Accountability of Grantee. The Grantee has full fiscal and programmatic responsibility
for managing all aspects of grant and grant-supported activities, subject to the oversight
of the Corporation. The Grantee is accountable to the Corporation for its operation of the
AmeriCorps Program and the use of Corporation grant funds. It must expend grant funds
in a judicious and reasonable manner, and it must record accurately the service activities
and outcomes achieved under the grant. Although Grantees are encouraged to seek the
advice and opinion of the Corporation on special problems that may arise, such advice
does not diminish the Grantee's responsibility for making sound judgments and does not
mean that the responsibility for operating decisions has shifted to the Corporation.
b. Notice to Corporation. The Grantee will notify the appropriate Corporation's Program
or Grants Officer immediately of any developments or delays that have a significant
impact on funded activities, any significant problems relating to the administrative or
financial aspects of the Grant, or any suspected misconduct or malfeasance related to the
Grant or Grantee. The Grantee will inform the Corporation official about the corrective
action taken or contemplated by the Grantee and any assistance needed to resolve the
situation.
c. Notice to the Corporation's Office of Inspector General. The Grantee must notify the
Office of Inspector General immediately of losses of federal funds or goods/services
supported with federal funds, or when information discovered by someone at a program
indicates that there has been waste, fraud or abuse,or any violation of criminal law, at the
program or at a sub-grantee.
21. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS.
a. General. The Grantee must maintain financial management systems that include
standard accounting practices, sufficient internal controls, a clear audit trail and written
cost allocation procedures as necessary. Financial management systems must be capable
of distinguishing expenditures attributable to this Grant from expenditures not
attributable to this Grant. This system must be able to identify costs by programmatic
year and by budget category and to differentiate between direct and indirect costs or
administrative costs. For further details about the Grantee's financial management
responsibilities, refer to OMB Circular A-102 and its implementing regulations (45
C.F.R. 2543) or A-110 and its implementing regulations (45 C.F.R. 2541), as applicable.
b. Source Documentation. The Grantee must maintain adequate supporting documents for
its expenditures (federal and non-federal) and in-kind contributions made under this
Grant. Costs must be shown in books or records [e.g., a disbursement ledger or journal],
and must be supported by a source document, such as a receipt, travel voucher, invoice,
bill, in-kind voucher, or similar document.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 33
c. Time and Attendance Records.
i. Staff.
(a) Except as provided in (b) and (c) below, salaries and wages charged directly
to this Grant or charged to matching funds must be supported by signed time
and attendance records for each individual employee regardless of position,
and by documented payrolls approved by a responsible official of the Grantee.
Except as provided in(b) and(c) below, salaries and wages chargeable
between this Grant and other programs or functions of the Grantee
organization must be supported by signed time and attendance records for
each individual regardless of position appropriately distributing the
individual's time to the different programs or functions.
(b) Educational institutions are not required to support charges for salaries and
wages with signed time and attendance records for professorial and
professional staff if they are in compliance with the criteria in Section 8.b of
OMB Circular A-21 for acceptable methods of documenting the distribution
of charges for personal services.
(c) State, Local and Indian Tribal governmental units are not required to support
charges for salaries and wages with signed time and attendance records if they
are in compliance with the standards of Section 11.h of OMB Circular A-87
for the support and documentation of salaries and wages.
ii. AmeriCorps Members. The Grantee must keep time and attendance records on
all AmeriCorps members in order to document their eligibility for in-service and
post-service benefits. Time and attendance records must be signed both by the
member and by an individual with oversight responsibilities for the member.
d. Audits. A grantee organization that expends $300,000 or more of total federal awards in
a fiscal year is required to obtain a single audit for that year conducted by an independent
auditor in accordance with the Single Audit Act, as amended, 31 U.S.C. 7501, et seq.,
and OMB Circular A-133. (If the grantee expends federal awards under only one federal
program, it may elect to have a program specific audit, if it is otherwise eligible.) A
grantee that does not expend$300,000 in federal awards is exempt from the single audit
requirements of OMB Circular A-133 for that year. However, it must continue to
conduct financial management reviews of its programs, and records must be available for
review and audit.
A recipient of a Federal grant (pass-through entity) is required in accordance with
paragraph 400(d) of OMB Circular A-133 to do the following with regard to its
subrecipients: (1) identify the Federal award and funding source; (2) advise subrecipients
of all requirements imposed on them; (3) monitor subrecipient activities and compliance;
(4) ensure subrecipients have A-133 audits when required; (5) issue decisions and ensure
follow-up on audit findings in a timely way: (6) where necessary. adjust its own records
and financial statements based on audits; and (7) require subrecipients to permit access
by the pass-through entity and auditors to records and financial statements as necessary
for the pass-through entity to comply with A-133.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 34
e. Consultant Services. Payments to individuals for consultant services under this Grant
will not exceed S443.00 per day(exclusive of any indirect expenses, travel, supplies and
so on).
22. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS.
a. Definitions. "Administrative costs"means general or centralized expenses of overall
administration of an organization that receives Corporation funds and does not include
particular Program or project costs. For organizations that have an established indirect
cost rate for federal awards, administrative costs mean those costs that are included in the
organization's indirect cost rate. Such costs are generally identified with the
organization's overall operation and are further described in OMB Circulars A-21, A-87
and A-122. For organizations that do not have an established indirect cost rate for federal
awards, administrative costs include:
i. Costs for financial, accounting, auditing, contracting or general legal services
except in unusual cases where they are specifically approved in writing by the
Corporation as program costs;
ii. Costs for internal evaluation, including overall organizational management
improvement costs (except for independent and internal evaluations of the
Program or project evaluations that are specifically related to creative methods of
quality improvement); and
iii. Costs for general liability insurance that protects the organization(s) responsible
for operating a Program or project, other than insurance costs solely attributable
to the Program or project.
Administrative costs may also include that portion of salaries and benefits of the
Program's director and other administrative staff not attributable to the time spent in
support of a specific Program or project. The principles that pertain to the allocation and
documentation of personnel costs are stated in the OMB circulars that are incorporated in
Corporation regulations [45 CFR 2541.220(b)].
Administrative costs generally do not include the following allowable expenses directly
related to a Program or project(including their operations and objectives), such as:
i. Allowable direct charges for members, including living allowances, insurance
payments made on behalf of members, training and travel;
ii. Costs for staff(including salary,benefits, training and travel) who recruit, train,
place or supervise members or who develop materials used in such activities, if
the purpose is for a specific Program or project objective;
iii. Costs for independent evaluations and any internal evaluations of the Program or
project that are related specifically to creative methods of quality improvement;
iv. Costs, excluding those already covered in an organization's indirect cost rate,
attributable to staff that work in a direct Program or project support, operational,
or oversight capacity, including, but not limited to: support staff whose functions
directly support Program or project activities; staff who coordinate and facilitate
single or multi-site Program and project activities; and staff who review,
FINAL-JUNE,2002 35
disseminate and implement Corporation guidance and policies directly relating to
a Program or project;
v. Space, facility and communication costs that primarily support Program or
project operations, excluding those costs that are already covered by an
organization's indirect cost rate; and
vi. Other allowable costs, excluding those costs that are already covered by an
organization's indirect cost rate, specifically approved by the Corporation as
directly attributable to a Program or project.
b. Limitation by Statute.Administrative costs cannot exceed 5% of total Corporation
funds actually expended under this award.
c. Fixed 5%. If approved on a case-by-case basis by the Corporation, the grantee may
charge, for administrative costs, a fixed 5% of the total of the Corporation funds
expended. In order to charge this fixed 5%, the grantee match for administrative costs
may not exceed 10% of all direct cost expenditures. These rates may be used without
supporting documentation and are in lieu of an indirect cost rate.
d. Indirect Cost Rates.
i. If grantees have an approved indirect cost rate, such rate will constitute
documentation of the grantee's administrative costs including the 5% maximum
payable by the Corporation and the grantee match of administrative costs.
ii. If a grantee wants to claim more than 10% match in administrative costs it must
have or obtain an approved indirect cost rate. Where appropriate, the Corporation
will establish an indirect cost rate that may be used for this and other federal
awards.
e. Consistency of Treatment. To be allowable under an award, costs must be consistent
with policies and procedures that apply uniformly to both federally financed and other
activities of the organization. Furthermore, the costs must be accorded consistent
treatment in both federally financed and other activities as well as between activities
supported by different sources of federal funds.
23. EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY COSTS.
Equipment and supplies will be handled in accordance with 45 C.F.R. 2541 —Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local
Government or with 45 C.F.R. 2543 —Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-profit Organizations.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 36
24. PROJECT INCOME.
a. General. Income earned as a direct result of the Program's activities during the award
period will be retained by the Grantee and used to finance the non-Corporation share of
the Program.
b. Fees for Service. When using assistance under this Grant, the Grantee may not enter into
a contract for or accept fees for service performed by members when:
i. The service benefits a for-profit entity;
ii. The service falls within the other prohibited Program activities set forth in Clause
4 of these Grant Provisions; or
iii. The service violates the non-displacement Provisions of the Act set forth in
Clause 31 of these Grant Provisions.
25. PAYMENTS UNDER THE GRANT.
a. Advance Payments. The Grantee may receive advance payments of Grant funds,
provided the Grantee meets the financial management standards specified in OMB
Circular A-102 and its implementing regulations (45 C.F.R. 2541) or A-110 and its
implementing regulations (45 C.F.R. 2543), as applicable.
b. Immediate Cash Flow Needs. The amount of advance payments requested by the
Grantee must be based on actual and immediate cash needs in order to minimize federal
cash on hand in accordance with policies established by the U.S. Department of the
Treasury in 31 C.F.R. 205.
c. Discontinuing Advance Payments. If a Grantee does not establish procedures to
minimize the time elapsing between the receipt of the cash advance and its disbursement,
the Corporation may, after providing due notice to the Grantee, discontinue the advance
payment method and allow payments in advance only by individual request and approval
or by reimbursement.
d. Interest-Bearing Accounts. The Grantee must deposit advance funds received from the
Corporation in federally-insured, interest-bearing accounts. The exceptions to this
requirement follow:
i. Institutions of Higher Education and Other Non-Profit Organizations. If a
Grantee is covered by 45 C.F.R. 2543 it must maintain advance funds in interest-
bearing accounts unless:
(a) It receives less than S 120,000 in federal funds per year;
(b) The best reasonably available account would not be expected to earn interest
in excess of S250 per year on federal cash balances; or
(c) The required minimum balance is so high that it would not be feasible within
expected federal and non-federal cash resources.
Earned interest must be remitted annually to HHS-PMS , Rockville, MD 20852.
Grantees may keep up to S250 of interest per year to offset administrative
expenses.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 37
ii. State and Local Governments. All Grantees and sub-Grantees covered by 45
C.F.R. 2541, with the exception of State Governments and Indian Tribes, must
remit earned interest quarterly to the Corporation. Grantees may keep up to$100
of the earned interest per year to offset administrative expenses.
26. RETENTION OF RECORDS.
The Grantee must retain and make available all financial records,supporting documentation,
statistical records, evaluation and program performance data, member information and personnel
records for 3 years from the date of the submission of the final Financial Status Report(SF
269A). If an audit is started prior to the expiration of the 3-year period, the records must be
retained until the audit findings involving the records have been resolved and final action taken.
27. SITE VISITS.
The Corporation reserves the right to make site visits to review and evaluate Grantee records,
accomplishments, organizational procedures and financial control systems; to conduct
interviews; and to provide technical assistance as necessary. To the extent feasible, these will be
coordinated with, and in most cases organized by, State Commissions for AmeriCorps*State
programs, parent organizations for AmeriCorps*National project sites, and Program Officers for
AmeriCorps*Tribes and Territories Programs. Site visits will be made in the least disruptive
manner possible.
28. LIABILITY AND SAFETY ISSUES.
a. Liability Insurance Coverage. The Grantee must have adequate liability insurance
coverage for the organization, employees and members, including coverage of members
engaged in on- and off-site project activities.
Member Safety. The Grantee must institute safeguards as necessary and appropriate to
ensure the safety of members. Members may not participate in projects that pose undue
safety risks.
29. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE.
a. Notice to Employees and Members. In accordance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act,
41 U.S.C. 701 et seq., implementing regulations, 45 C.F.R. 2542, and the Grantee's
certification, the Grantee must publish a statement notifying employees and members
that:
i. The unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a
controlled substance is prohibited in the Grantee's workplace and Program;
ii. Conviction of any criminal drug statute must be reported immediately to the
Grantee;
iii. The employee's employment or member's participation is conditioned upon
compliance with the notice requirements; and
FINAL-ICNE.2002 38
iv. Certain actions will be taken against employees and members for violations of
such prohibitions.
b. Criminal Drug Convictions. The Grantee's employees and members must notify the
Grantee in writing of any criminal drug convictions for a violation occurring in the
workplace or during the performance of project activities no later than 5 days after such
conviction. The Grantee must notify the Corporation within 10 days of receiving notice
of such conviction. The Grantee must take appropriate action against such employee or
member, up to and including termination or member release for cause consistent with the
Corporation's rules on termination and suspension of service, or require the employee or
member to satisfactorily participate in an approved drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation
Program.
c. Drug-Free Awareness Program. The Grantee must establish a drug-free awareness
Program to inform employees and members about the dangers of drug abuse in the
workplace, the Grantee's policy of maintaining a Drug-Free workplace, any available
drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance and member support services,
and the penalties that may be imposed for drug abuse violations.
d. Grantee Non-Compliance. The Grantee is subject to suspension, termination or
debarment proceedings for failure to comply with the Drug-Free Workplace Act.
e. Non-Discrimination and Confidentiality Laws. In implementing the Drug-Free
Workplace Act, the Grantee must adhere to federal laws and its Grant assurances related
to alcohol and substance abuse non-discrimination and confidentiality.
30. NON-DISCRIMINATION.
a. Assurances. The Grantee must assure that its program or activity, including those of its
subgrantees, will be conducted, and facilities operated, in compliance with the applicable
statutes set forth below, as well as with their implementing regulations. The Grantee
must obtain an assurance of such compliance prior to extending Federal financial
assistance to subgrantees. The U.S, Government shall have the right to seek judicial
enforcement of these assurances.
b. Discrimination Prohibited. A person, including a member, a service recipient, or
Program staff, may not, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, political
affiliation, disability, or religion be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of,
or be otherwise subjected to discrimination, directly or through contractual or other
arrangements, under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The
prohibition on discrimination on the basis of disability protects otherwise qualified
individuals with disabilities. The prohibition against discrimination on the basis of
religion with respect to Program staff applies only to Program staff paid with Corporation
funds but excludes staff paid with Corporation funds who were employed by the Grantee
on the date the Corporation grant was awarded
FINAL-JUNE,2002 39
This prohibition against discrimination includes but is not limited to:
i. Denying an opportunity to participate in, benefit from, or provide a service,
financial aid, or other benefit;
ii. Providing an opportunity which is different or provided differently;
iii. Denying an opportunity to participate as a member of a planning or advisory body
integral to the program;
iv. Segregating or subjecting a person to separate treatment;
v. Providing an aid, benefit, or service to a qualified disabled person that is less
effective in affording opportunity to obtain the same result, gain the same benefit,
or reach the same level of achievement;
vi. Denying a qualified disabled person the opportunity to participate in integrated
programs or activities, even though permissibly separate or different programs or
activities exist;
vii. Restricting a person's enjoyment of an advantage or privilege enjoyed by others;
viii. Providing different or separate aid, benefits, or services to disabled persons unless
necessary in order to provide them as effectively as provided to others;
ix. Treating a person differently in determining admission, enrollment, quota,
eligibility, membership or other requirements;
x. Using criteria or administrative methods, including failing to provide needed
auxiliary aids for disabled persons, which have the effect of subjecting persons to
discrimination, or defeating or substantially impairing achievement of the
objectives of the program for a person;
xi. Selecting a site or location of facilities with the purpose or effect of excluding
individuals from, denying them the benefits of, or subjecting them to
discrimination under the program;
xii. Denying a qualified disabled person a benefit, aid, or participation because
facilities whose groundbreaking occurred after May 30, 1979 are inaccessible to
or unusable by disabled persons or because programs or activities in facilities
predating May 30, 1979, when viewed in their entirety, are inaccessible to or
unusable by disabled persons; and
xiii. Failing to provide reasonable accommodation to otherwise qualified individuals
with disabilities.
The Corporation's "Civil Rights Statement Regarding Volunteers, Service Participants
and Other Beneficiaries," and its "Policy Against Sexual, Racial, National Origin, or
Religious Harassment" which include additional discrimination prohibitions are attached
and incorporated herein.
c. Public Notice of Nondiscrimination. The Grantee must notify members, service
recipients, applicants, Program staff, and the public, including those with impaired vision
or hearing, that it operates its program or its activity subject to the nondiscrimination
requirements of the applicable statutes. The notice must summarize the requirements,
note the availability of compliance information from the Grantee and the Corporation,
and briefly explain procedures for filing discrimination complaints with the Corporation.
Sample language is:
FINAL—JUNE,2002 40
y A
It is against the law for organizations that receive federal financial assistance from the
Corporation for National Service to discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, disability, sex, age, political affiliation, or, in most programs, religion. It is
also unlawful to retaliate against any person who, or organization that, files a
complaint about such discrimination.
In addition to filing a complaint with local and state agencies that are responsible for
resolving discrimination complaints, you may bring a complaint to the attention of the
Corporation for National Service. If you believe that you or others have been
discriminated against, or if you want more information, contact:
(Name, address, phone number—both voice and TDD, and preferably toll free—
FAX number and e-mail address of the Grantee) or
Equal Opportunity Office
Corporation for National Service
1201 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20525
(202) 606-5000, ext. 312 (voice); (202) 565-2799 (TDD)
(202) 565-2816 (FAX); eo cLcns.gov(e-mail)
The Grantee must include information on civil rights requirements, complaint procedures
and the rights of beneficiaries in member contracts, handbooks, manuals, pamphlets, and
post in prominent locations, as appropriate. The Grantee must also notify the public in
recruitment material and application forms that it operates its program or activity subject
to the nondiscrimination requirements. Sample language, in bold print, is "This program
is available to all, without regard to race, color, national origin, disability, age, sex,
political affiliation, or, in most instances, religion." Where a significant portion of the
population eligible to be served needs services or information in a language other than
English, the Grantee shall take reasonable steps to provide written material of the type
ordinarily available to the public in appropriate languages.
d. Records and Compliance Information. The Grantee must keep records and make
available to the Corporation timely, complete, and accurate compliance information to
allow the Corporation to determine if the Grantee is complying with the civil rights
statutes and implementing regulations. Where a Grantee extends federal financial
assistance to subgrantees, the subgrantees must make available compliance information
to the Grantee so it can carry out its civil rights obligations.
The Corporation will provide specific guidance regarding records and compliance
information. At a minimum, the Grantee should have available racial, ethnic, sex, and
disability data regarding members;applicants, service recipients/applicants and Program
staff/applicants. This data should be sufficient to measure the distribution of benefits to
the eligible population and evaluate the services provided to the different segments of the
population being served. Data on members and Program staff should be gathered, on a
FINAL-JUNE,2002 41
voluntary basis, directly from the individuals. Data on service recipients may be
gathered, estimated, or based on census or other statistics.
Racial and ethnic data should be gathered for the following categories:
Hispanic/Latino/Spanish culture or origin or non-Hispanic/Latino/Spanish culture or
origin(one or the other) and one or more of the following:
• American Indian or Alaska Native
• Asian
• Black or African American
• Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
• White
e. Obligation to Cooperate. The Grantee must cooperate with the Corporation so that the
Corporation can ensure compliance with the civil rights statutes and implementing
regulations. The Grantee shall permit access by the Corporation during normal business
hours to its books, records, accounts, staff, members, facilities, and other sources of
information as may be needed to determine compliance.
f. Discrimination Complaints,Investigations and Compliance Reviews. The
Corporation may review the practices of the Grantee to determine civil rights compliance.
Any person who believes discrimination has occurred may file a discrimination
complaint with the Corporation's Equal Opportunity Office. The Grantee may not
intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against an individual to interfere with a right
or privilege secured by the civil rights acts or because the person made a complaint,
testified, assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or
hearing. The Corporation will keep the identity of complainants and witnesses
confidential except as necessary to conduct an investigation, hearing, or judicial
proceeding.
The Corporation will investigate whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or
other information indicates a possible failure to comply with the statutes and their
implementing regulations. If an investigation indicates a failure to comply, the
Corporation will so inform the Grantee and any applicable subgrantees and will attempt
to resolve the matter by voluntary means. If the matter cannot be resolved by voluntary
means, the Corporation will initiate formal enforcement action.
Discrimination complaints may be raised through the Grantee's grievance procedure.
Use of the Grantee's grievance procedure may not be a required precursor to filing a
federal discrimination complaint with the Corporation. Use of the Grantee's grievance
procedure does not preclude filing a federal discrimination complaint. The Grantee's
grievance procedure should advise members that use of the grievance procedure does not
stop the running of Corporation time frames for filing a discrimination complaint with the
Corporation. In all cases where discrimination allegations have been raised with the
Grantee, the Grantee must submit a written report to the Corporation's Equal Opportunity
FINAL-JUNE,2002 42
Office, which has a review authority over the investigation and disposition of all
discrimination complaints.
g. Self-Evaluation Requirements. The Grantee must comply with(1) the self-evaluation
requirements under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act regarding accessibility for
individuals with disabilities; (2) the self-evaluation requirements of the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975; and(3) the self-evaluation requirements under title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972 regarding discrimination based on sex. Guidance
regarding the self-evaluation requirements may be obtained from the Corporation's Equal
Opportunity Office, 1201 New York Avenue,NW, Washington, D.C. 20525, (202) 606-
5000, ext. 312 (voice); (202) 4565-2799 (TDD); (202) 565-2816 (FAX); or eo@cns.gov
(e-mail).
h. Applicable Statutes. In accordance with its assurances, the Grantee must comply with
all federal statutes relating to non-discrimination to the extent applicable, including, but
not limited to titles VI and VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d and
3601 et seq.), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), title IX of
the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.) the Age Discrimination Act
of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L.
92-255), the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention. Treatment and
Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42
U.S.C. 290dd-3 and 290ee-3), and the requirements of any other non-discrimination
provision in the National and Community Service Act of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12635) or any
other applicable non-discrimination provision.
31. SUPPLEMENTATION, NON-DUPLICATION AND NON-DISPLACEMENT.
a. Supplementation. Grant funds may not be used to replace state or local public funds
that had been used to support Programs or projects of the type eligible to receive
Corporation Grant funds. For any given Program, this condition will be satisfied if the
aggregate non-federal public expenditure for that Program or project in the fiscal year
that support is to be provided is not less than the previous fiscal year.
b. Non-Duplication. Grant funds may not be used to duplicate services that are available in
the locality of a Program or project. The Grantee may not conduct activities that are the
same or substantially equivalent to activities provided by a state or local government
agency in which the Grantee entity resides.
c. Non-Displacement.
i. Prohibition on Displacing an Employee or a Position. The Grantee may not
displace an employee or position, including partial displacement such as reduction
in hours, wages or employment benefits, as a result of the use by such employer
of a member in a Program or project.
ii. Prohibition on Promotional Infringement. The Grantee may not create a
community service opportunity that will infringe in any manner on the
promotional opportunity of an employed individual.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 43
iii. Prohibition on Displacing Employee Services, Duties or Activities. A member
in a Program or project may not perform any services or duties, or engage in
activities that would otherwise be performed by an employee, as part of the
assigned duties of such employee.
iv. Prohibition on Supplanting, Hiring or Infringing on Recall Rights. A
member in a Program or project may not perform any services or duties, or
engage in activities, that:
(a) Will supplant the hiring of employed workers; or
(b) Are services, duties or activities with respect to which an individual has recall
rights pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or applicable personnel
procedures.
v. Other Prohibitions. A member in a Program or project may not perform
services or duties that have been performed by or were assigned to any:
(a) Currently employed worker;
(b) Employee who recently resigned or was discharged;
(c) Employee who is subject to a reduction in force or who has recall rights
pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement or applicable personnel
procedures; y v
(d) Employee who is on leave (terminal, temporary, vacation, emergency or sick);
or
(e) Employee who is on strike or is being locked out.
32. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE.
a. Setting Up a Grievance Procedure. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 12636 and
implementing regulations at 45 C.F.R. 2540.230, the Grantee must establish and
implement a process for filing and adjudicating grievances from members, labor
organizations and other interested parties. A grievance process may include dispute
resolution programs such as mediation, facilitation, assisted negotiation and neutral
evaluation. A grievance process must provide an opportunity for a grievance hearing and
binding arbitration. If the grievance alleges fraud or criminal activity, it must be brought
to the attention of the Inspector General of the Corporation immediately. Discrimination
complaints may also be raised through the grievance procedure.
b. In the event that a Sub-Grantee of a direct Grantee of the Corporation is no longer in
existence or otherwise does not provide a grievance procedure that complies with this
Provision, the direct Grantee is responsible for handling any grievance in accordance
with 45 C.F.R. 2540.230.
c. Alternative Dispute Resolution.
i. Informal Resolution. The aggrieved party may seek resolution of a grievance
through alternative means of dispute resolution(ADR) such as mediation or
facilitation. ADR proceedings must be initiated within 45 calendar days of the
date of the alleged occurrence. At the initial session of the ADR proceedings, the
party must be advised in writing of the right to file a grievance and right to
FINAL-JUNE.2002 44
arbitration. If the matter is resolved, and a written agreement is reached, the party
will agree to forego filing a grievance in the matter under consideration.
ii. Neutral Facilitation. If ADR is instituted, the process must be aided by a neutral
party who, with respect to an issue in controversy, functions specifically to aid the
parties in resolving the matter through a mutually achieved and acceptable written
agreement. The neutral party may not compel a resolution. Proceedings before
the neutral party must be informal, and the rules of evidence will not apply. With
the exception of a written and agreed-upon ADR, the proceeding must be
confidential. Any decision by the neutral party is advisory and is not binding
unless both parties agree. If the grievance is not resolved within 30 calendar days
of initiation, the neutral party again must inform the aggrieved party of his or her
right to file a formal grievance.
d. Formal grievance proceeding.
Time Limits. Except for a grievance that alleges fraud or criminal activity, a
grievance must be made no later than one year after the date of the alleged
occurrence. If a hearing is held on a grievance, it must be conducted no later than
30 calendar days after the filing of such grievance. A decision on any such filed
grievance must be made no later than 60 days after filing.
ii. Effect of Informal Process. In the event an aggrieved party files a grievance
after participating in an informal dispute resolution process, the neutral party may
not participate in the formal grievance proceeding. In addition, no
communication or proceeding of the informal dispute resolution process may be
referred to or introduced into evidence at a grievance or arbitration proceeding.
e. Arbitration.
Selection of Arbitrator. If there is an adverse decision against the party who
filed the grievance, or no decision has been reached after 60 calendar days after
the filing of a grievance, the aggrieved party may submit the grievance to binding
arbitration before a qualified arbitrator who is jointly selected and who is
independent of the interested parties. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator,
within 15 calendar days after receiving a request from one of the parties, the
Corporation will appoint an arbitrator from a list of qualified arbitrators.
ii. Time Limits. An arbitration proceeding must be held no later than 45 days after
the request for arbitration, or if the arbitrator is appointed by the Corporation, the
proceeding must occur no later than 30 calendar days after the arbitrator's
appointment. A decision must be made by the arbitrator no later than 30 calendar
days after the date the arbitration proceeding begins.
iii. Cost. In accordance with 42 U.S.C. 12636(f)(4)(D), the cost of the arbitration
proceeding must be divided evenly between the parties to the arbitration unless
the party requesting a grievance proceeding prevails. If the grievant prevails, the
Grantee must pay the total cost of the proceeding and reasonable attorney's fees
of the prevailing party incurred in connection with the ADR proceeding.
FINAL-JUNE.2002 45
r I
iv. Effect of Noncompliance with Arbitration. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 12636(f)(7),
a suit to enforce an arbitration award may be brought in any federal district court
having jurisdiction over the parties without regard to the amount in controversy or
citizenship.
f. Suspension of Placement. If a grievance is filed regarding a proposed placement of a
member in a Program or project, such a placement must not be made unless the
placement is consistent with the resolution of the grievance.
g. Remedies. Remedies for a grievance filed under a procedure established by the Grantee
may include:
i. Prohibition of a placement of a member; and
ii. In grievance cases where there is a violation of non-duplication or non-
displacement requirements and the employer of the displaced employee is the
Grantee:
(a) Reinstatement of the employee to the position he or she held prior to the
displacement;
(b) Payment of lost wages and benefits;
(c) Re-establishment of other relevant terms, conditions and privileges of
employment; and
(d) Any other equitable relief that is necessary to correct any violation of the
non-duplication or non-displacement requirements or to make the
displaced employee whole.
33. OWNERSHIP AND SHARING OF GRANT PRODUCTS.
a. Ownership. Unless otherwise specified, the Grantee owns and may copyright any work
that is subject to copyright, including software designs, training manuals, curricula,
videotapes and other products produced under the Grant. However, the Grantee may not
sell any work that includes an AmeriCorps logo without prior Corporation written
approval.
b. Corporation Use. The Corporation retains royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable
licenses to obtain, use, reproduce, publish or disseminate products, including data,
produced under the Grant and to authorize others to do so. The Corporation may
distribute such products through a designated clearinghouse.
c. Sharing Grant Products. To the extent practical, the Grantee agrees to make products
produced under the Grant available at the cost of reproduction to others in the field.
34. PUBLICATIONS.
a. Acknowledgment of Support. Publications created by members may include an
AmeriCorps logo if they are consistent with the purposes of the Grant. The Grantee is
FINAL-JUNE,2002 46
responsible for assuring that the following acknowledgment and disclaimer appears in
any external report or publication of material based upon work supported by this Grant.
"This material is based upon work supported by the Corporation for National Service
under AmeriCorps Grant No. . Opinions or points of view expressed in this
document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of, or
a position that is endorsed by, the Corporation or the AmeriCorps Program."
b. Materials Provided to Corporation. The Grantee is responsible for assuring that two
copies of any such material are sent to the Corporation's Office of Public Affairs and
Program Office.
35. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION.
a. Internal Evaluations. The Grantee must track progress toward achievement of their
Program objectives. The Grantee also must monitor the quality of service activities, the
satisfaction of both service recipients and members, and management effectiveness.
Internal evaluation and monitoring should be a continuous process, allowing for frequent
feedback and the quick correction of weaknesses.
b. Independent Evaluations. The Grantee is encouraged to obtain an independent
evaluation and must do so if provided for in the approved budget.
c. External Evaluation and Data Collection. The Grantee must cooperate with the
Corporation and its evaluators in all monitoring and evaluation efforts. As part of this
effort, the Grantee must collect and submit certain member data, including the total
number of members in the Program, and the number of members by race, ethnicity,
gender, age, economic background,education level, disability classification and
geographic region. The Corporation will provide forms for collecting member data.
d. Accountability for Results. Eligibility for future funding may be contingent upon
compliance with Sec. 35 (a)(b) and(c) as well as satisfactory performance.
36. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF GRANT.
a. Suspension of the Grant. In an emergency situation the Corporation may suspend a
Grant for not more than 30 calendar days. Examples of such situations may include,but
are not limited to:
i. Serious risk to persons or property;
ii. Violations of federal, state or local criminal statutes; and
iii. Material violation(s) of the Grant or contract that are sufficiently serious that they
outweigh the general policy in favor of advance notice and opportunity to show
cause.
b. Termination of the Grant. Pursuant to 45 C.F.R. 2540.400, the Corporation may
terminate payments under the grant, revoke the designated member positions, or recover
FINAL-JUNE,2002 47
_ r
Grant funds for failure comply with applicable provisions of this Grant. However, the
Corporation will provide the Grantee reasonable notice and opportunity for a full and fair
hearing, subject to the following conditions:
i. Notice. The Corporation will notify the Grantee by letter or telegram that it
intends to terminate payments, revoke positions or recover Grant funds, either in
whole or in part, unless the Grantee shows good cause why such assistance should
not be terminated, revoked or recovered. In this notice, the grounds and the
effective date for the proposed termination or revocation will be described. The
Grantee will be given at least 7 calendar days to submit written material in
opposition to the proposed action.
ii. Right to a hearing. The Grantee may request a hearing on a proposed
termination, revocation or recovery. Upon 5 days notice to the Grantee, the
Corporation may authorize the conduct of a hearing or other meetings at a
location convenient to the Grantee to consider the proposed action. A transcript
or recording must be made of a hearing.
c. The Grantee may suspend or terminate assistance to a Sub-Grantee, provided that such
action affords the Sub-Grantee, at a minimum, the notice and hearing rights set forth in
the Provisions applicable to the Corporation in this section (36).
37. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE.
Should there be any inconsistency among the Grant Award, the AmeriCorps Special Provisions,
the General Provisions, and the approved Grant Application, the order of precedence that will
prevail is (1) Grant Award, (2) the AmeriCorps Special Provisions, (3) the General Provisions,
and(4) the approved Grant Application.
FINAL-JUNE.200: 48
FEB 1 3 2 �3
ALISON WEYHER `�1"+�' (kA� � {CITY RF®. 'j�.eI�01�
' '� ' �� ROSS C. "ROCKY"ANDERSON
DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MAYOR
COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
TO: Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer DATE: January 14, 2003
FROM: Alison Weyher .
RE: Petition 400-02-32: This is a request to amend the zoning text and district map to
create a "Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District"on the real property located at 1530
South 500 West Street in a General Commercial (CG)zoning district. The applicant is
proposing a sign overlay to permit pole signs every 150 linear feet of street frontage. The
overlay would also permit individual wall signs for the multiple businesses and franchises
within the automobile dealership.
Staff Contact: Everett L. Joyce, Planning Division 535-7930
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance.
BUDGET IMPACT: None
DISCUSSION: The property is used as a multiple automotive dealership,
having new and used vehicles in connection with the authorized automotive franchises.
The property consists of an 11-acre parcel with 654 feet of street frontage on 500 West
Street. The facility includes the following businesses within the common automotive
development; Jerry Seiner Chevrolet, Jerry Seiner Oldsmobile, Jerry Seiner Cadillac,
Jerry Seiner Hummer, Jerry Seiner GM OK Certified Used Cars, Jerry Seiner Car Wash,
The GM Guy Café, Jerry Seiner Chevrolet Service, Jerry Seiner Cadillac/Oldsmobile
Service, and Jerry Seiner Wholesale Parts.
The applicant has identified that both the manufacturer and Department of Motor Vehicles
(DMV) impose specific signage requirements on automobile dealers. Each automobile's
franchise is generally treated as a separate business unit. In most instances, and
particularly in large commercial market areas such as Salt Lake City, manufacturers impose
separate signage design requirements as a condition of granting a franchise. Even though
franchises may be affiliated through a common corporate parent, General Motors in this
case, franchise divisions nevertheless impose their own separate criteria, including signage
requirements, for each franchise operation.
In addition to manufacturer signage requirements, the DMV imposes certain signage
requirements on car dealers. These sign requirements are intended to give notice to
consumers. The DMV has taken the position that each assumed name unit of a parental
dealer is required to meet the signage requirements.
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 841 11
TELEPHONE: 801-535-6230 FAX: 801-535-6005
Analysis:
The alternative localized sign overlay district is intended to apply to large-scale
developments with a common theme. The minimum required site size is 2 acres. The
proposed sign overlay meets several of the purposes of sign regulations of the zoning
ordinance. As a multi-franchise automotive dealership with attendant facilities, it is the
type of large-scale development to which the overlay district is intended to apply.
The CG zoning district permits only one pole sign per street frontage. Due to the inherent
nature of new car automobile dealership businesses located on large parcels of property and
franchise signage requirements, the applicant proposes a localized alternative sign overlay
district. The proposal permits one pole sign for each 150 lineal feet of street frontage.
With 654 lineal feet of street frontage, the property would be entitled to up to 4 pole signs.
If the same property were broken down into 100-foot wide parcels (minimum lot width in
the CG zone), 6 pole signs would be permitted.
There is currently one pole sign on the property. The overlay district would enable the
dealership to meet its Hummer franchise requirements by adding an additional sign. With
potential changes in the automobile business the applicant states that it is reasonable that
future requirements would be met under the proposed overlay district, if adopted.
The West Salt Lake Community Master Plan identifies the area for general commercial
land use. The property is zoned CG general commercial. The purpose of this zoning
district is to provide an environment for a variety of commercial uses, some of which
involve outdoor display/storage of merchandise and materials. The proposed localized
sign overlay would permit the number of signs that would be similar to the more typical
parcel size within the CG zoned area of the West Salt Lake Community and is consistent
with the land use policies of the West Salt Lake Community Master Plan.
Public Process:
The applicant presented the request to the West Salt Lake community council on April
17, 2002. They requested consideration for the sign overlay and two additional signs:
one for used vehicles and one the Hummer franchise. The community council
unanimously endorsed the proposal.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the petition request on
December 5, 2002. The Planning Commission moved to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the creation of a localized alternative sign
overlay for the Jerry Seiner multi-franchise automotive dealership located at 1530 South
500 West Street.
Relevant Ordinances:
Section 21A.50.050 Standards for General Amendments.
Contents
Chronology
Proposed Ordinance
City Council Hearing Notice
Notice
Mailing List
Planning Commission
Public Hearing Notice and Postmark
Planning Commission agenda and minutes for December 5, 2002
Planning Commission Staff Report with public comments and department
comments
Original Petition
Chronology
Chronology
April 17, 2002 Petition request presented to the West Salt Lake Community
Council
September 4, 2002 Planning Division received the petition request
October 23, 2002 Assigned petition
October 25, 2002 Petition review and response request sent to Transportation
October 31, 2002 Received response from the Transportation Division
November 20, 2002 Notice sent of Planning Commission public hearing
December 5, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing
December 9, 2002 Ordinance request sent to City Attorney
December 12, 2002 Planning Commission ratified minutes of December 5, 2002
meeting
December 31, 2002 Received ordinance from City Attorney
Proposed Ordinance
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2003
(Creating an alternative sign overlay district for the
automobile dealership properties at 1530 South 500 West)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY ZONING CODE TO
CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1530 SOUTH 500
WEST, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-02-32.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City zoning code contains various specifications for
signage which is allowed in respective zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City zoning code also provides for the availability of
alternative sign overlay districts; and
WHEREAS, after public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City
Council, the City Council finds that the creation of an alternative sign overlay district for
the automobile dealership properties located at 1530 South 500 West is in the best
interest of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Section 21A.46.090.D.5 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and
hereby is amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
SECTION 2. Section 21A.46.090.D.6 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and
hereby is enacted to read as follows:
6. Supplementary regulations:
a. Lot frontage requirements: A minimum lot frontage of one
hundred (100) feet shall be required for pole signs or monuments
signs.
SECTION 3. The Salt Lake City zoning map shall be and hereby is amended
consistent with the amendments set forth herein.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date
of its first publication.
Dated this day of , 2003.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2003.
Published:
G.\Ordinance 03\Creating an alternative sign overlay district-Dec 31,2002-clean doc
2
Exhibit A
Section 21A.46.090.D.5
5. Sign Type,Size And Height Standards For The New Automotive Dealership Localized
Alternative Sign Overlay District
For purposes of this Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District only,the following definitions
shall apply:
"Property"—shall mean that certain real property constituting approximately 11 acres located
at 1530 South and 500 West, Salt Lake City, and more particularly described as Sidwell parcel
number 15-13-152-002.
"Business" --each of the following shall constitute a separate business or storefront: new
automobile franchise, service business for new automobile franchise, parts business,
manufacturer certified used automobile business in conjunction with new automobile franchise,
cafe,car wash, and such other separate business units operated on the Property and affiliated
with the new automotive dealership business operating on the Property.
STANDARDS FOR THE NEW AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCALIZED
ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT'
Types Of Signs Maximum Area of Maximum Height Minimum Number of Signs
Permitted g of Freestanding Setback3 Permitted Per
Si nag a Signs in Feet2 Sign Type
Flat sign 2 sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A I per Business or
(storefront ft.of store storefront
orientation)5 frontage4
Wall sign or flat 1 sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A4 I per building face
sign(general ft.of building face4
building
orientation)
Pole sign 1 sq. ft.per linear 35 feet or 25 feet 10 ft with a 1 per each 150
ft.of street above pavement maximum of 6 ft. lineal feet of street
frontage;200 sq. grade of the projection. No frontage with each
ft.maximum for a adjacent freeway extension across a sign separated by
single business, per subsection property line at least 100 feet,
300 sq. ft. 21A.46.070.T permitted. provided that a
maximum for manufacturer
multiple franchise be
businesses. displayed only
once on a pole sign
on the property.
Notes:
1. All other sign types and standards not specifically listed in the automobile dealership overlay shall
be regulated under the standards within the applicable zoning district.
2. For height limits on building signs,see subsection 21A.46.070.J of this Chapter.
3. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
4. A multiple franchise automobile dealership may combine the square footage total of both the
storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat and wall signs,subject to a
maximum combined area of signage not to exceed 3 square feet per lineal foot of building face.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2003
(Creating an alternative sign overlay district for the
automobile dealership properties at 1530 South 500 West)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SALT LAKE CITY ZONING CODE TO
CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT FOR THE
AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1530 SOUTH 500
WEST, PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. 400-02-32.
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City zoning code contains various specifications for
signage which is allowed in respective zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City zoning code also provides for the availability of
alternative sign overlay districts; and
WHEREAS, after public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City
Council, the City Council finds that the creation of an alternative sign overlay district for
the automobile dealership properties located at 1530 South 500 West is in the best
interest of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1. Section 21A.46.090.D.5 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and
hereby is amended to read as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
SECTION 2. Section 21A.46.090.D.6 of the Salt Lake City Code shall be and
hereby is enacted to read as follows:
6. Supplementary regulations:
a. Lot frontage requirements: A minimum lot frontage of one
hundred (100) feet shall be required for pole signs or monuments
signs.
SECTION 3. The Salt Lake City zoning map shall be and hereby is amended
consistent with the amendments set forth herein.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date
of its first publication.
Dated this day of , 2003.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2003.
Published:
G:\Ordinance 03\Creating an alternative sign overlay district-Jan 2,2003.doc
Exhibit A
Section 21A.46.090.D.5
5. Sign Type,Size And Height Standards For The New Automotive Dealership Localized
Alternative Sign Overlay District
For purposes of this Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District only,the following definitions
shall apply:
"Property"—shall mean that certain real property constituting approximately 11 acres located
at 1530 South and 500 West, Salt Lake City, and more particularly described as Sidwell parcel
number 15-13-152-002.
"Business"--each of the following shall constitute a separate business or storefront: new
automobile franchise, service business for new automobile franchise, parts business,
manufacturer certified used automobile business in conjunction with new automobile franchise,
café,car wash,and such other separate business units operated on the Property and affiliated
with the new automotive dealership business operating on the Property.
STANDARDS FOR THE NEW AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCALIZED
ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT'
Types Of Signs Maximum Area of Maximum Height Minimum Number of Signs
Permitted Signage of Freestanding Setback3 Permitted Per
Signs in Feet2 Sign Type
Flat sign 2 sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A 1 per Business or
(storefront ft. of store storefront
orientation)5 frontage4
Wall sign or flat 1 sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A4 1 per building face
sign(general ft.of building face4
building
orientation)
Pole sign 1 sq. ft.per linear 35 feet or 25 feet 10 ft with a 1 per each 150
ft. of street above pavement maximum of 6 ft. lineal feet of street
frontage;200 sq. grade of the projection. No frontage with each
ft. maximum for a adjacent freeway extension across a sign separated by
single business, per subsection property line at least 100 feet,
300 sq. ft. 21A.46.070.T permitted. provided that a
maximum for manufacturer
multiple franchise be
businesses. displayed only
once on a pole sign
on the property.
Notes:
6. All other sign types and standards not specifically listed in the automobile dealership overlay shall
be regulated under the standards within the applicable zoning district.
7. For height limits on building signs,see subsection 21A.46.070.J of this Chapter.
8. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
9. A multiple franchise automobile dealership may combine the square footage total of both the
storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat and wall signs,subject to a
maximum combined area of signage not to exceed 3 square feet per lineal foot of building face.
10. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
Planning Commission
Public Hearing Notice
Agenda
Minutes
Staff Report
Petition No. 400-02-32 is a request to amend the zoning text and create a "Localized
Alternative Sign Overlay District on the real property located at 1530 South 500
West in a CG zoning district. Proposed is a sign overlay district to permit pole
signs every 150 linear feet of street frontage, rather than one pole sign per property
frontage regardless of the length of the street frontage, as permitted in the existing
CG sign ordinance. The overlay would also permit multiple wall signs for the
multiple businesses within the automobile dealership.
Planner Everett Joyce reviewed the petition as written in the Staff report and reviewed the
vicinity map showing the location of the proposed pole signs. The building currently has
350 feet of store frontage with multiple flat signs. The applicant has stated that
manufacturers for franchises impose separate design requirements and conditions when
granting the franchise. Also, the Division of Motor Vehicles has requirements for car
dealers for multiple signage to separate different dealers. This request supports that
requirement. Mr. Joyce explained that the overlay district is used in several zones in the
City on sites of 2 acres minimum. It is used for sites with a common theme and similar
use. This lot is a large one parcel lot and not typical of most lots in the CG zone. The
applicant has indicated that due to the inherent nature of car/automotive dealerships, a
large parcel of property is needed. Mr. Joyce noted that the staff report contains a
comparison to the existing Ken Garff at 600 South and State. It is an older development
that was developed on multiple parcels. Six dealerships reside there and there are over
six pole or monument signs on that property. The applicant went before the community
council with a request for one sign for used car vehicles and one for a Hummer franchise.
Mr. Joyce noted that the staff report identifies seven purposes of sign regulations. The
actual sign overlay ordinance meets several of these purposes by allowing pole signs for
the franchises and allowing various wall signs for the different businesses to help locate
entrances and service areas. Mr. Joyce summarized the findings written in the staff
report and modified a draft copy of the ordinance text included in the staff report. The first
change is to footnote 1. In the table that identifies flat signs, wall signs, and pole signs, all
other signs that are applicable would go back to the typical CG zoning standards. A
second change is to the number of signs permitted per sign type under pole signs. Mr.
Joyce recommended that the language be modified to say that a single manufacture
franchise be displayed on only one pole sign on the property. This would prohibit a
dealership from obtaining approval for four signs and putting all franchises on all four
signs. The purpose of additional pole signs is to direct the customers towards the actual
businesses because it is such a large complex.
The Staffs recommends that the Planning Commission forward a favorable
recommendation to the City Council for the creation of an alternative sign overlay district
along with the draft text with the modifications as stated.
Chair Jonas asked for the size of the current sign and Mr. Joyce replied that it is 225
square feet. Under the requested proposal, only one sign can be 300 square feet and the
rest have to be smaller but they cannot total more than 654 square feet. This holds true
for the flat and wall signs. Footnote 4 allows a combination of general and oriented flat
signs so the maximum there would be 3 square feet per linear foot of the building face.
Chair Jonas wondered if there was any reason to extend the overlay zone to 1300 South
to accommodate the same use. Mr. Joyce was unsure if those dealerships have multiple
uses. Mr. Wilde stated that this idea was discussed and the staff determined that it needs
to be advertised and processed on its own merits.
Planning Commission Meeting 1 December 5,2002
Dorothy Pleshe, attorney for Jerry Seiner Dealerships and Jeff Davis, construction
manager, were present to represent the applicant. Ms. Pleshe thanked the staff for
meeting with them over the last year and a half to work out something that is consistent
with the City goals and still meets the needs for the various manufacturers. This
proposal would limit the number of signs to a maximum of four with restrictions. If they
parcel the property like others have done they would be allowed to have six signs but that
is not in the best interest of Jerry Seiner or the City. They decided to go with the overlay
district because they were able to define business specifically to the automotive related
industry. The proposed language for the overlay district defines business to include new
automobile franchises, service business for new automobile franchises, parts business,
manufacturers certified use car business in conjunction with new automobile franchise, the
café, the car wash, and separate other business units specifically affiliated with that
dealership. They were very careful to have that provided under the umbrella of the new
car dealership to avoid having other businesses piggy back on this type of ordinance.
Ms. Pleshe stated that in the event the property is ever sold or converted to a different
use, they would have to come before the Planning Commission and the City Council to
eliminate the sign ordinance. She believes this ordinance is a good compromise that
works for everyone.
Ms. Pleshe noted that the existing pole sign advertises Jerry Seiner Chevrolet,
Oldsmobile, and Cadillac. She asked Mr. Joyce if his modifications to the text would
change their ability to have those three names on one pole sign. Mr. Joyce explained that
it would prevent them from having those names on other pole signs.
Chair Jonas clarified that the number of signs could reach a maximum of four even though
three were discussed during the field trip. Mr. Davis explained that the reason for doing
that is to accommodate new franchises that Jerry Seiner may obtain by having the signage
already approved by the City. Chair Jonas understood the intent but he felt that Jerry
Seiner could do what he has previously done and put multiple dealerships on one sign.
Mr. Davis remarked that the manufacturers will not allow them to put three franchises on
one pole. As an example, they could not put Hummer with any other franchise.
Mr. Daniels asked if the proposed signs would be illuminated and Mr. Davis replied that
they would. Mr. Chambless wanted to know if the intent is to make these signs visible to
the freeway traffic and he was told that was the intent. Chair Jonas felt it was safe to
assume that they would maximized the height of the signs. Mr. Davis noted that the
existing sign is at the maximum height so the new signs would be the same. Mr. Wilde
clarified that the sign ordinance allows a freeway oriented sign to be 25 feet above the
pavement grade of the freeway. The maximum height is based on the height of the
freeway for freeway exposure.
Ms. Seelig noted that the community council notes indicate that the vote was on two signs
and she wanted to know if the proposal was changed after going to the community council.
Mr. Davis stated that the community council was not interested in seeing the written
material he presented and asked for a brief explanation prior to taking a vote, therefore, he
may not have explained it as well as he should. Chair Jonas clarified that Jerry Seiner's
proposal is to put up two more signs and this overlay district will allow them to put in
additional pole signs at some point in the future.
Chair Jonas opened the public hearing.
Planning Commission Meeting 2 December 5,2002
Jim Derek, representing the Larry H. Miller Group, supported this signage request.
Chair Jonas closed the public hearing.
Chair Jonas asked how the staff made the determination of 150 feet. Mr. Wilde explained
that during the course of negotiations, Jerry Seiner wanted to maintain some flexibility and
150 feet was still more restrictive than what could be accomplished if this were a series of
100 foot lots. Chair Jonas asked if the 150 foot number came from any other precedent
and Mr. Wilde replied that it did not. Mr. Chambless asked if it was also intended to be
highly visible for a period of time to vehicles moving along the freeway.
Mr. Wilde stated that the size and height standard is inherent in the zoning ordinance so
they did not focus on freeway visibility distance issues.
Motion for Petition 400-03-32
Based on the findings of fact, Robert "Bip" Daniels moved to forward a positive
recommendation to the City Council for the creation of a localized alternative sign overlay
district for the multi-franchise automobile dealership at 1530 South 500 West Street in a
CG zoning district. Kay (berger)Arnold seconded the motion.
Mr. Muir suggested that the motion include the recommendation by Staff that each
franchise be represented on one sign only. Mr. Daniels and Ms. Arnold accepted this
amendment to the motion.
Findings of Fact
A. The proposed localized sign overlay would permit the number of signs that would
be similar to the more typical parcel size within the CG zoned area of the West
Lake Community and is consistent wit the land use policies of the West Salt Lake
Community Master Plan. The sign overlay meets several of the purposes of sign
regulations of the zoning ordinance. As a multi-franchise automotive dealership
with attendant facilities, it is the type of large-scale development to which the
overlay district is intended to apply.
B. The proposed sign standards of the automobile dealership's "Localized Alternative
Sign Overlay" provide for sign patterns and usage what are consistent with the
signage character that exists within the CG zoning district for the more typical
smaller parcels. The proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall
character of existing development.
C. The adjacent properties are not adversely affected by the proposed sign overlay
text changes.
•
D. There are no overlay districts affecting the subject property and this standard is not
applicable.
E. The public facilities and utilities are adequate to serve the property.
Ms. Arnold, Mr. Chambless, Mr. Daniels, Mr. Diamond, Mr. Muir, Ms. Noda, and Ms.
Seelig voted "Aye". Ms Funk and Ms. McDonough were not present. Jeff Jonas, as
chair, did not vote. The motion carried.
Planning Commission Meeting 3 December 5,2002
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Petition 400-02-32
Text amendment request for an alternative sign overlay district for
Jerry Seiner and G.O.K. Properties at 1530 S. 500 West
December 5, 2002
REQUEST
Petition 400-02-32 is a request to
amend the zoning text and create a
"Localized Alternative Sign
Overlay District"on the real -- 1 I - ::_-_------ - -
property located at 1530 South 500 130o s
West Street in a CG general - -- -
commercial zoning district. I —
Proposed is a sign overlay to permit - mum .
pole signs every 150 linear feet of -
street frontage. The overlay would 7= , 1.
also permit individual wall signs for ---i HOPE AVE s _
the multiple businesses and I �, 'i : -
franchises within the automobile 3 =- 1w _
dealership. r s
_ _ _ 'may = i � m lsoo S , - ,
infiZca
Section 21 A46.130 authorizes local `111:49 Z 1_171F i'
alternative sign overlay districts as a 14 /I /-___--1- _
zoning ordinance text amendment 3-
isand an amendment to the zoning II 3 g f
district map. The purpose of an I
=
alternative sign overlay is to —= /� ,, t` ' 3_.
N /
provide large-scale land uses that
have a common design element to -r
complement and enhance the i . //ram ` I , ' i" 1``-- I _- '-
development and use through
specialized signage. The minimum Vicinity Map
acreage for applying a sign overlay
is 2 acres.
,,,HN13„u,1,11uW�14MMIU.,,,,.na., MAIOIM,,, ,,HbMMIIIOMMI,IO,,. . ,O.MMOMM,. .,M ,uuNu ,, .IIpM,,M N i ,W,. ,N SOSI,, a,m, a ,.,,�M.
Petition 400-02-32 Page 1
COMMUNITY / NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL REVIEW
A requested sign overlay proposal was presented to the West Salt Lake community
council on April 17, 2002. Presented at that time was consideration for sign overlay and
that the request was for two additional signs one for used vehicles and one the Hummer
franchise. The community council unanimously endorsed the proposal.
GENERAL BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
Applicant: Jerry Seiner Chevrolet, Inc and GOK Properties, LC
Purpose of zoning
amendment: To create a localized sign overlay district for the specific
property located at 1530 S. 500 West.
Previous Case Files: None
Existing zoning: The existing zoning district map designation is "CG" General
Commercial.
Existing Master Plan
Policy: West Salt Lake Community Master Plan identifies the future
land use for this area as general commercial. Commercial land
uses include retail trade, wholesale trade and personal and
business services.
Affected area and
parcel number: Sidwell parcel number 15-13-152-002 an I 1-acre parcel.
IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF ISSUES
Franchise Agreements
The property is used as a multiple automotive dealership, having new and used vehicles in
connection with the authorized automotive franchises. The property consists of an 11-acre
parcel with 654 feet of street frontage on 500 West Street. The facility includes the
following businesses within the common automotive development; Jerry Seiner Chevrolet,
Jerry Seiner Oldsmobile, Jerry Seiner Cadillac, Jerry Seiner Hummer, Jerry Seiner GM
OK Certified Used Cars, Jerry Seiner Car Wash, The GM Guy Café, Jerry Seiner
Chevrolet Service, Jerry Seiner Cadillac/Oldsmobile Service, and Jerry Seiner Wholesale
Parts.
The applicant has identified that both the manufacturer and Department of`Motor Vehicles
(DMV) impose specific signage requirements on automobile dealers. Each automobile's
IxxWxMMWUMxxxxiixxxxNxNx1xixxxxxixMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx1xNw.1)MMIxxxtx MMIIMMIMxxxxxximxxxxxxxxxxNuxmtu3xxx.11MiMxxxxx1xx4xxxxnroxx AMII xwxxnxix MOUMxxxxxxxw)
Petition 400-02-32 Page 2
franchise is generally treated as a separate business unit. In most instances, and
particularly in large commercial market areas such as Salt Lake City, manufactures impose
separate signage design requirements as a condition of granting a franchise. Even though
franchises may be affiliated through a common corporate parent, General Motors in this
case, franchise divisions nevertheless impose their own separate criteria, including signage
requirements, for each franchise operation.
In addition to manufacturer signage requirements, the DMV imposes certain signage
requirements on car dealers. These sign requirements are intended to give notice to
consumers. The DMV has taken the position that each assumed name unit of a parental
dealer is required to meet the signage requirements.
Proposed Overlay District
The CG zoning district permits only one pole sign per street frontage. Due to the inherent
nature of new car automobile dealership businesses located on large parcels of property and
franchise signage requirements, the applicant proposes a localized alternative sign overlay
district. The proposal permits one pole sign for each 150 lineal feet of street frontage.
With 654 lineal feet of street frontage, the Property would be entitled to up to 4 pole signs.
If the same property were broken down into 100-foot wide parcels, 6 pole signs would be
permitted.
There is currently one pole sign on the property. The overlay district would enable the
dealership to meet its Hummer franchise requirements by adding an additional sign. With
potential changes in the automobile business the applicant states that it is reasonable that
future requirements would be met under the proposed overlay district, if adopted.
Comparison with multiple small parcel developments.
A dealership that is similar to the Jerry Seiner operation is the Ken Garff dealership located
at 500 South and State Street in a D-1 zoning district. The Ken Garff center consists of six
franchises located on multiple parcels of approximately seven acres. Because of the
benefits of having multiple parcels the Ken Garff site contains a mix of six pole or
monument signs plus one multi-franchise pole sign with an electronic reader-board.
The localized sign overlay would permit similar signage at the Jerry Seiner dealership as
the Ken Graff dealership. Limited signage in the CG district discriminates against large-
scale automotive developments having substantial street frontage and multiple franchise
operations. The extra signage proposed by the overlay would also be consistent with
signage permitted if the site was more typical of the average parcel sizes within the CG
zoning district. The sign overlay district recognizes the need to treat large-parcel properties
separately and on a case-by-case basis.
IM„,„„Ill.,,.i»UMIUM M,I,ti,.,M,,,IMIHM„p� W, MOMOMM,u,,w,,,,, IMMUM.M, ,a,,,a ,.MHW,..�b„a ,11. U,.�M ,.l, ,,,,a�.al� IS ,u„ , .
Petition 400-02-32 Page 3
CODE CRITERIA / DISCUSSION / FINDINGS OF FACT
Section 21A.50.050 Standards for General Amendments.
A. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City.
Discussion: The West Salt Lake Community Master Plan identifies the area for
general commercial land use. The property is zoned CG general commercial. The
purpose of this zoning district is to provide an environment for a variety of
commercial uses, some of which involve outdoor display/storage of merchandise and
materials. The minimum lot area is 10,000 square feet. The maximum building
height is 60 feet or 90 feet through a conditional use process.
The alternative localized sign overlay district is intended to apply to large-scale
developments with a common theme. The minimum required site size is 2 acres.
Purpose of sign regulations are intended to:
1. Eliminate potential hazards to motorists and pedestrians by requiring that signs
are designed, constructed, installed and maintained in a manner that promotes the
public health, safety and general welfare.
2. Encourage signs which, by their good design, are integrated with and harmonious
to the buildings and sites, including landscaping, which they occupy;
3. Encourage sign legibility through the elimination of excessive and confusing sign
displays;
4. Preserve and improve the appearance of the city as a place in which to live and
work, and create an attraction to nonresidents to come to visit or trade;
5. Allow each individual business to clearly identify itself and the nature of its
business in such a manner as to become a hallmark of the business which will
create a distinctive appearance and also enhance the city's character;
6. Safeguard and enhance property values; and
7. Protect public and private investment in buildings and open space.
The proposed sign overlay supports several purpose statements of the sign ordinance
chapter. The overlay allows individual pole signs for each dealership franchise and
allows individual wall signs for the various businesses. Allowing these sign
modifications will help to minimize the confusion of using a single pole sign and wall
sign limited under present sign regulations. Adequate signage for the multiple
businesses and activities on the 11-acre parcel that has over 370'feet of building
frontage facing 500 West Street will enhance property values and the investment in
the development as well as help patrons locate the specific area of the development
they are seeking.
The purpose of the localized alternative sign overlay is for large-scale land uses that
have common design elements that can be complemented and enhanced through the
use of special signage. All facilities on the subject site have a common theme and
Petition 400-02-32 Page 4
design element. The architecture has common design elements and the use of the
property is limited to serving a single industry.
Findings: The proposed localized sign overlay would permit the number of signs
that would be similar to the more typical parcel size within the CG zoned area of the
West Salt Lake Community and is consistent with the land use policies of the West
Salt Lake Community Master Plan. The sign overlay meets several of the purposes
of sign regulations of the zoning ordinance. As a multi-franchise automotive
dealership with attendant facilities, it is the type of large-scale development to which
the overlay district is intended to apply.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character of
existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.
Discussion: The Jerry Seiner automobile dealership is located within a heavy
commercial /industrial area adjacent to Interstate 15. The properties along 500 West
Street in this area are zoned General Commercial "CG". Areas to the west are zoned
Light manufacturing "M-1". The properties east of the interstate are zoned
Commercial "CG". The types of signs permitted within these areas are similar those
proposed within the sign overlay.
The properties along 500 West Street between 1300 and 1700 South Streets are large
parcels. These include the Larry Miller Ford Truckland dealership, the Jazz Practice
Center and concrete fencing and materials plant.
The CG area east of the interstate consist of significantly smaller lot sizes. The
subject parcel is 11 acres. The mean lot size within the CG zoning district with the
West Salt Lake Community is 0.92 acres, the mean for the Central Community Iying
just east of Interstate 15 is 0.58 acres.
Findings: The proposed sign standards of the automobile dealership's "Localized
Alternative Sign Overlay"provide for sign patterns and usage that are consistent
with the signage character that exists within the CG zoning district for the more
typical smaller parcels. The proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall
character of existing development.
C. The extent to which the proposed amendment will adversely affect adjacent
properties.
Discussion: Adjacent properties are industrial and large-scale commercial uses. To
the south is a steel plant converted to producing concrete products and to the north is
the Jazz practice center. Immediately west of the subject property are freight
railroad lines. Located east of the 500 West Street frontage is Interstate 15.
Findings: The adjacent properties are not adversely affected by the proposed sign
overlay text changes.
IwunnnSOMMI SWunRIMIIM M1000 WfinNnIMIINU MM1111wn 00111M tuun5MIunnnn INUM MMOMIMMtI nntnuiunnMunnnu»ununnnn0nwuiw 1.1thiKwnnianumNnin lini.M mnnnn5wn IONJIMhn
Petition 400-02-32 Page 5
D. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of any
applicable overlay zoning districts,which may impose additional standards.
Discussion: There are no existing overlay districts in place on the subject property.
Findings: There are no overlay districts affecting the subject property and this
standard is not applicable.
E. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject
property, including but not limited to roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools, storm water drainage systems,
water supplies, and waste water and refuse collection.
Discussion: The subject property is already developed. The petition request is for
signage related to the existing development.
Findings: The public facilities and utilities are adequate to serve the property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the findings of fact, staff recommends that the Planning Commission forward a
positive recommendation to the City Council for the creation of a localized alternative
sign overlay district for the multi-franchise automobile dealership at 1530 South 500 West
Street in a CG zoning district.
Everett L. Joyce
December 5, 2002
Attachments: Exhibit I: Proposed Localized Alternative Sign Overlay text
Exhibit 2: West Salt Lake Community Council minutes
Exhibit 3: Transportation Division comments.
•
00110»N1uitH40MMNwttNI6tHuu1In143MIOAN.MOMMIS ISMI.WINOMSH44NNbNII r.UMINwtwuapSt.NtltuNu»uifilUi.11.01n)1M.MHIMIHMUNIxiW10,0Au)OMIIIIWOUlu.M)0unmt.i11MUMNMMMI M/ti
Petition 400-02-32 Page 6
Exhibit 1
Localized Alternative Sign Overlay Text
mwu,umx.iw swb aiIwMSswnblantI MODO rMIUMMilifiu.p »MawwliMMUwwmnoAbrxww1MUSIM IISM, w„n11.1.1 Wmeawu 11MWMMUMMSmOltata w"IMMislnw
Petition 400-02-32 Page 7
Proposed Localized Alternative Sign Overlay Ordinance Text
Section 21A.46.090.D.5
5. Sign Type, Size And Height Standards For The New Automotive Dealership
Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District
For purposes of this Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District only, the following
definitions shall apply:
"Property"— shall mean that certain real property constituting approximately 11
acres located at 1530 South and 500 West, Salt Lake City, and more particularly
described on Exhibit A attached hereto.
"Business" -- each of the following shall constitute a separate business or
storefront: new automobile franchise, service business for new automobile
franchise,parts business, manufacturer certified used automobile business in
conjunction with new automobile franchise, café, car wash, and such other
separate business units operated on the Property and affiliated with the new
automotive dealership business operating on the Property.
STANDARDS FOR THE NEW AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP LOCALIZED
ALTERNATIVE SIGN OVERLAY DISTRICTI
Types Of Signs Maximum Area of Maximum Height Minimum Number of Signs
Permitted Signage of Freestanding Setback3 Permitted Per
Signs in Feet Sign Type
Flat sign 2 sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A I per Business or
(storefront ft. of store storefront
orientation)5 frontage'
Wall sign or flat I sq. ft.per linear (see note 2 below) N/A4 I per building face
sign(general ft. of building face"
building
orientation)
Pole sign 1 sq. ft.per linear 35 feet or 25 feet 10 ft with a 1 per each 150
ft. of street above pavement maximum of 6 ft. lineal feet of street
frontage;200 sq. grade of the projection. No frontage with each
ft.maximum for a adjacent freeway extension across a sign separated by
single business, per subsection property line at least 100 feet,
300 sq. ft. 21A.46.070.T permitted. provided there be
maximum for only one pole sign
multiple per manufacturer
businesses. franchise.
Notes: •
1. All other sign types and standards not specifically listed in the automobile dealership overlay shall
be regulated under the standards within the applicable zoning district.
2. For height limits on building signs,see subsection 21 A.46.070.7 of this Chapter.
3. Not applicable to temporary signs mounted as flat signs.
4. A multiple franchise automobile dealership may combine the square footage total of both the
storefront orientation and the general building orientation flat and wall signs,subject to a
maximum combined area of signage not to exceed 3 square feet per lineal foot of building face.
5. Storefront flat signs limited to locations on the lower 2 floors.
..,.w.,....,6...w pn101nI,....a,...nitai AMMUMWIMMAS,..,,IMMOSIH,I..M..H.,,»...BOMM,.,I.MIII,.H.M.. .., ..,,,MAPI,...XOthw14.031.3.,t,.M ITIM.. � .w„SIIIIM.,.,.M.
Petition 400-02-32 Page 8
•
Exhibit 2
West Salt Lake Community Council Minutes
WIlNiuNNmN11NUNNNnGNNNiNINY1Nl�NNA OAISIN NIHtIMIUMIll SN1nNn IALIIMMII NU1WN OISBI NIMOMMVN15eNSNNNM)nKNkmANNHW1SIMUIIHN)NIWMiNNNNO NHN)wNN410111 IMMIIIOMMI 1UbNN1NISM34SI
Petition 400-02-32 - Page 9
MINUTES OF THE WEST SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COUNCIL
HELD ON APRIL 17, 2002
GLENDALE SENIOR HOUSING CENTER
Jay Ingleby,vice chair, opened meeting at 7:12 p.m.
Shelley Stevensen, SLCPD, gave crime report. Crime down but remember to lock doors even
during the day. Most burglaries occur in the daytime. Reminded members that garage sales are
not businesses. Each household allowed two day-long or one week-long garage sales per year.
Call in about violations. Addressed various other concerns.
Jeff Davis, real estate developer for Jerry Seiner Auto, explained that the dealership on 1500
S. 500 W. is largest in state but by law is only allowed one sign for the entire lot. Requested
permission for two additional signs reading "Certified Used Vehicles" and "Hummer" to be placed
on their property, visible from the freeway. Dixie Carter made motion to approve the two signs.
Linda Whitaker, second. Vote: 18 for, 0 against.
Ricardo Bueno, Bueno Auto Sales, 1004 S. Redwood Rd., before council to fulfill conditional
use permit requirements for a permit to store cars purchased mainly at auction. Cars to be stored
are waiting for repairs, then will be resold at his used car lot. Did not request permit for towing lot.
Does not want towing lot. Planning to buy adjacent property that will put cars way off main road.
Cars usually on property less than 60 days. Long time member of the community. Committed to
obeying laws. Erin Willson moved to approve conditional use permit. Sandra Moore, second.
Vote: 16 for, 2 against.
Rob Garbach, SLC Zoning, invited to meeting to address concerns regarding zoning laws.#1
violation: unlicensed or junk cars on property. Law: can't park on lawn (must keep lawn alive),
vehicles licensed even if off road, recreational vehicles must be in rear yard on hard surface or on
side yard and hard surface behind 6-foot screened fence and can't take up regular parking stalls.
Re: vacant homes. Owners must maintain. As long as maintained, no limit on how long they can
be vacant. May be boarded as long as boarding permit paid. Re: cars parked on street. Unlawful
to park longer than 48 hours without moving. Parking enforcement 535-6628. Re: neighborhood
cleanup. Phil Gonzales suggested city look at Davis Co. cleanup where large construction
waste-type containers are used rather than putting debris on curb. Re: painting and repair of
vehicles. OK to repair own vehicle on house property. Not OK to have repair shop on house
property. Re: storage sheds. No permit required for sheds up to 120 sq ft. (10X12) and one-story,
17 ft tall with pitched roof. Permit required after that. Shed cannot exceed 720 sq ft. All sheds
must be in the back yard, 4 ft front house, 1 ft from road, 10 ft from neighboring homes.
Addressed what zoning handles and what health dept handles. Call zoning if in doubt. Re:
violations. Remember violator are allowed 2 weeks after first letter from city, 30 days after second
warning letter. Then, fines assessed up to$5000 before city can take any legal action against
violator. Can take up to a year. Questions, call 535-7933.
Petition 400-02-32 Page 10
Exhibit 3
Transportation Division Comments
xnml luxuu�nuuxnuuuNn�wnuuuinmNL 5nuniuwuniuuwN�u�nuA�UinNNNpmlutuixtlbuN �uuYutu�nuuntmwun�ui l�uuwuuwu�anti�nbnif uuanuuNSiwwiW4n5Knq+nwu�xutlu�uNuuuu�n�W
Petition 400-02-32 Page 11
October 29,2002
Everett L.Joyce
Planning Division
451 South State Street,Rm.406
Salt Lake City,Utah 84111
Re: Petition 400-02-32 for a Sign Overlay District by Jerry Seiner automotive dealership at 1530
South 500 West.
Dear Everett:
The Transportation Division has reviewed the proposed sign petition. Our review comments are as
follows:
The proposed overlay district is noted for the 681 feet frontage only. We would expect the same application
for the Ford Truck land dealership to the north.
We see no impact to the traffic system with signs remaining on private property. We do require that the
location of all signs comply to the clear sight zone issue and require transportation reviews for monument
or directional signs at driveways that may impact pedestrian safety.
Please fee free to call me at 535-6630 if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Barry D. Walsh
Transportation Engineer Assoc.
cc: Kevin J.Young,P.E.
Kurt G.Larson,P.E.
Scott Weiler,Engineering
file
Barry D. Walsh
Engineering Technician VI
Salt Lake City Transportation Division
349 South 200 East, Suite 450
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
n1nu�4h1l*MunununIUMM1u111HUMMIIMM MMT1 5auwu1iduituWm401111 wunInnnu4lnliMOuunuwuIMMOMnufinuiit11 asunmuuw 3814PU IPSAMnbIMINIM USUM iuMnuwwuunwtunxw
Petition 400-02-32 Page 12
FEB 1 2 2033
ALISON WEYHER1 Q� v1111 V�ORF °r�--rI�l
'� ������- ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON
DIRECTOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
TO: Rocky Fluhart, h'ef Administrative Officer` C ate: January 31, 2003
FROM: Alison Weyher
RE: Petition 400-02-29: A Petition initiated by Bip Daniels, Chair of the Salt Lake City
Planning Commission, requesting to amend the Zoning Map for 1135 East 1700
South from Institutional to Residential R-1-5000.
STAFF CONTACTS: Joel Paterson, Senior Planner(535-6141)
e-mail: joel.paterson@ci.slc.ut.us
DOCUMENT TYPE: Ordinance
BUDGET IMPACT: None
DISCUSSION: Petition 400-02-29 is a request initiated by the Salt Lake City
Planning Commission to change the zoning of property located at 1135 East 1700 South from
Institutional (I) to Residential (R-1-5000). The Planning Commission initiated this petition for
the property owners after discovering that the subject parcels were erroneously zoned
Institutional as part of the 1995 zoning rewrite project.
ISSUE ORIGIN: In 1995, as a part of the zoning ordinance rewrite project, the City
changed the zoning of several parcels on the northeast corner of 1100 East and 1700 South from
B-3 (Limited Business and Neighborhood Shopping) and R-2 (Two-family Dwellings)to
Institutional. The remainder of the R-2 zoning in this vicinity was changed to R-1-5000.
All but two of the parcels zoned Institutional are owned by the LDS Church and are now
occupied by an LDS ward. The other two parcels, located at 1135 East 1700 South, were
erroneously zoned Institutional and are owned by John Janson and John Koo. One parcel is
occupied by a legal non-conforming duplex; the other is vacant.
The City changed the zoning of these two parcels to Institutional, apparently believing that the
properties were part of the LDS Church property immediately to the north and west.
When the owners inquired about constructing a single-family home on the vacant parcel they
were informed that the Institutional zone does not permit stand-alone residential land uses. The
owners then approached the Planning Division to request the zoning of the parcels be changed to
a residential district.
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 1
TELEPHONE: 801-535-6230 FAX: 601-535-6005
®RECYCLED PAPER
Public Process: This site is located within the East Central Community Council boundaries and
is within 600 feet of the Sugar House Community Council Boundary. Therefore, under the
provisions of the City's community council notification ordinance (Section 2.62 of the Salt Lake
City Code), the petition was presented to both councils. See Exhibit 6 to review comments
submitted during the public process.
• East Central Community Council: The East Central Community Council considered
this petition on September 11, 2002, and raised no objections to the proposed map
.amendment.
• Sugar House Community Council: The Sugar House Community Council reviewed
this petition on September 4, 2002, and voted 15-0 (one abstention) in favor of the map
amendment.
• Planning Commission: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November
21, 2002, and forwarded a positive recommendation to the City Council to change the
zoning of 1135 E. 1700 S. from Institutional to Residential R-1-5000.
MASTER PLAN CONSIDERATIONS: The Central Community Development Plan recommends
Low-density residential (5.5 dwelling units per acre)zoning for these parcels. The proposed
zoning map amendment is consistent with the master plan.
RELEVANT ORDINANCES: Salt Lake City Zoning Ordinance section 21A.50.050, Standards for
General Amendments (see Exhibit 5B, Planning Commission Staff Report to review the relevant
findings).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. CHRONOLOGY
2. PROPOSED ORDINANCE
3. CITY COUNCIL HEARING NOTICE
4. MAILING LABELS
5. PLANNING COMMISSION
a. Hearing Notice and Postmark
b. Staff Report
c. Agendas/Minutes
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS
7. RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
8. ORIGINAL PETITION
ORIGINAL PETITION
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
EXHIBIT 1
CHRONOLOGY
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
CHRONOLOGY
PETITION 400-02-29
August 15, 2002 Petition 400-02-29 initiated by Bip Daniels, Chair of the Planning
Commission
August 20, 2002 Petition assigned to Joel Paterson
September 4, 2002 Petition presented to Sugar House Community Council which voted
15-0 (one abstention)to support petition
September 11, 2002 Petition presented to East Central Community Council which voted
unanimously to support the petition
November 6, 2002 Notice mailed to surrounding property owners and community council
chairs
November 8, 2002 Property posted
November 21, 2002 Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded a positive
recommendation to the City Council to amend the zoning map
December 2, 2002 Requested that the Attorney's Office prepare an ordinance
January 30, 2003 Received ordinance from Attorney's Office
•
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
EXHIBIT 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 2003
(Rezoning Property Located at 1135 East 1700 South)
AN ORDINANCE REZONING PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1135 EAST 1700
SOUTH FROM INSTITUTIONAL (I) TO RESIDENTIAL (R-1-5000), PURSUANT TO
PEITITION NO. 400-02-29.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and the City Council have held public
hearings and have taken into consideration citizen testimony, filing, and demographic
details of the area, the long range general plans of the City, and any local master plan as
part of their deliberations. Pursuant to these deliberations, the City Council has
concluded that the proposed change of zoning for the property located at 1135 East 1700
South is appropriate for the development of the community in that area.
NOW, THEREFORE,be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah:
SECTION 1. Rezoning. The property located at 1135 East 1700 South, which is
more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, shall be and hereby is rezoned
from Institutional (I) to Residential (R-1-5000).
SECTION 2. Amendment of zoning map. The Salt Lake City zoning map, as
adopted by the Salt Lake City Code, relating to the fixing of boundaries and zoning
districts, shall be and hereby is amended consistent with the rezoning identified above.
SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the date
of its first publication and shall be recorded with the Salt Lake County Recorder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,this day of
, 2003.
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to Mayor on
Mayor's Action: Approved. Vetoed.
ROSS C. ANDERSON
MAYOR
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER
y/- 30—v3
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 2003.
Published:
1130103
G:\Ordinance 03\Rezoning Property located at 1135 E 1700 S-Jan 30,2003.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PETITION 400-02-29
1135 E. 1700 South
Sidwell Parcel Numbers:
16-17-258-031
16-17-258-033
Beginning at a point 294.68 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 16-A,
Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey; thence east 103 feet; thence north 148.5 feet; thence
west 103 feet; thence south 148.5 feet to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
EXHIBIT 5B
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
•
•
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Petition 400-02-29
Zoning Map Amendment for 1135 East 1700 South
Institutional to Residential R-1-5000
November 21, 2002
REQUEST
Petition 400-02-29 is a request initiated ;_ E _ . k: ; I
by the Salt Lake City Planning 4::�" ,� :t
Commission to change the zoning of -:7_ I ! y
located at 1135 East 1700 South ,b/ it4 F; `:
property � � SE
from Institutional (I) to Residential (R-1- N [ 1F- 'rP • F
5000). As a zoning map amendment, the ' _ _ .
MP 'sue� -- ;sw"���q,.£�., ,�-.
Planning Commission must forward a t�' - ,1 _ `"
recommendation to the City Council, the tAll • .'1 °'..E ARV i
final decision-making body for rezoning i";:'"—," "'t•- :'•` `` ' ra �E
q g 6: : t� " _ : t
requests. The Planning Commission ' i7,--ems -r-,I�� 5 =
initiated this petition for the properly ;' = { � t I-
P Pe Y 1 1 a
owners after discovering that the subject �T -- . .L.; ;- 7 u--
''
parcels were erroneously zoned 1135 tit 1700 South
Institutional as part of the 1995 zoning Zoning change horn Institutional to R•1a0o0
rewrite project.
COMMUNITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
This site is located within the East Central Community Council boundaries and is within
600 feet of the Sugar House Community Council Boundary_ Therefore, under the
provisions of the City's community council notification ordinance (Section 2.62 of the Salt
Lake City Code),the petition was presented to both councils. On September 4, 2002, the
Sugar House Community Council voted 15-0(one abstention) in favor of changing the
zoning designation. The East Central Community Council voted unanimously to support 1
this petition. Although there was no formal vote tally, approximately 25 people were in
attendance.
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 November 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
GENERAL BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
Applicant: Salt Lake City Planning Commission initiated the petition
for the property owners, John Janson and John Koo
Lot Size:
Parcel 1 (16-17-258-031) 7,870 square feet (0.18 acres)
Parcel 2 (16-17-258-033) 7,425 square feet (0.17 acres)
Existing Zoning and
Overlay Districts: Institutional District
Groundwater Source Protection Overlay (Secondary
Recharge)
Existing Master Plan
Policies: Low density residential (5.5 dwelling units per acre)
IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF ISSUES
In 1995, as a part of the zoning ordinance rewrite project, the City changed the zoning of
several parcels on the northeast corner of 1 100 East and 1700 South from B-3 (Limited
Business and Neighborhood Shopping) and R-2 (Two-family Dwellings) to Institutional.
The remainder of the R-2 zoning in this vicinity was changed to R-1-5000.
All but two of the parcels zoned Institutional are owned by the LDS Church and are now
occupied by an LDS ward. The other two parcels, located at 1135 East 1700 South, were
erroneously zoned Institutional and are owned by John Janson and John Koo. One parcel
is occupied by a legal non-conforming duplex; the other is vacant.
The City changed the zoning of these two parcels to Institutional, apparently believing that
the properties were part of the LDS Church property immediately to the north and west.
When the owners inquired about constructing a single-family home on the vacant parcel
they were informed that the Institutional zone does not permit stand-alone residential land
uses. The owners then approached the Planning Division to request the zoning of the
parcels be changed to a residential district.
The City Attorney's Office no longer allows administrative map changes to fix zoning
rewrite errors because of the length of time that has passed since the rewrite was enacted.
Therefore,on August 15, 2002,the Planning Commission initiated a petition to amend the
zoning map to correct the apparent error.
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 —2— November 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
•
CODE CRITERIA / DISCUSSION I FINDINGS OF FACT
A decision to amend the text of the zoning ordinance or the zoning map is a matter
committed to the legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one
standard. However, in making its decision concerning a proposed amendment, the
Planning Commission and the City Council must consider the following factors:
21A.50.050 Standards for General Amendments.
A. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City.
Discussion: The Central Community Development Plan recommends low-density
residential zoning for these two parcels. The property was zoned R-2 prior to the
zoning rewrite in 1995.
Findings: The proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the purposes,
goals, objectives and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character
of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.
Discussion: With the exception of the properties fronting on 1100 East, this area
has developed as a low-density residential neighborhood. Amending the zoning
map as proposed would be consistent with existing development in the vicinity
Findings: The proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character of
existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.
C. The extent to which the proposed amendment will adversely affect adjacent
properties.
Discussion: The property to the east and south is zoned R-1-5000 and has
developed residentially. The property located to the north and west is zoned
Institutional and is occupied by an LDS Ward. The proposed zoning map
amendment will have no adverse affect on adjacent property.
Findings: Changing the zoning of the property at 1135 E. 1700 South will
generate no adverse affect on adjacent properties.
D. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the provisions of any
applicable overlay zoning districts which may impose additional standards.
Findings: Residential development is consistent with the provisions of the
Groundwater Source Protection Overlay. Any new development would be limited
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 —3— November 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
to the land uses allowed in R-1-5000 district and would be compatible with
surrounding land uses_
E. The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject
property, including but not limited to roadways, parks and recreational
facilities, police and fire protection, schools, storm water drainage systems,
water supplies, and waste water and refuse collection.
Discussion: The proposed zoning map amendment will have no effect on the
City's ability to provide public services nor will it adversely affect local public
facilities. The proposed map amendment would restrict the range of allowable
land uses and limit the impact of redevelopment or new development of the
parcels. The result lessens any impact on public facilities and the City's ability to
provide services.
Findings: Amending the zoning map will have no adverse affect on existing
public facilities or the City's ability to provide public services_
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission forward a positive recommendation to the
City Council to change the zoning of 1135 East 1700 South from Institutional to
Residential R-1-5000.
Respectfully submitted,
Joel G. Paterson, AICP
Senior Planner
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 —Letters from Community Councils
Exhibit 2—Departmental Comments
Exhibit 3—Petition 400-02-29
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 -4- November 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
EXHIBIT 1
LETTER FROM COMMUNITY OR
NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
Staff Report Petition 400-02-29 November 21.2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
September 16, 2002
East Central Community Council
436 South 1200 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Salt Lake City Corporation
Planning Department
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Attention: Joel Paterson
Subject: Rezoning 1 135 East 1700 South
Dear Joel,
Thank you for attending the September General Meeting of the East Central Community Council
to discuss the error in zoning at 1 135 East 1700 South and the plan to rezone the property from
Institutional to R 1/5000.
A motion was passed without dissent:1) To support the rezone of the property from Institutional
to RI/5000, and 2)To request that the City proceed in an expedited manner to accomplish this
rezone so as to minimize any further delay for the property owners.
Again, thank you for bringing this issue to the attention of the East Central Community Council
and involving the community in the decision process.
Respectfully,
Chair, Dennis Guy-Sell, 673-7378
Vice Chair, Andy Fletcher, 467-2706
Secretary,Kathy Scott, 322-5288
Treasurer, Fran Schwab, 581-9643
Past Chair,Julia Robertson, 583-5663
Land Use Coordinator, Cindy Cromer, 355-4115
Master PIan Coordinator, Vicki Mickelsen
Moving People Committee, Creed Raymond, 583-8510
Historic Neighborhood Coordinator,Jolie Pollet, 328-4336
Bennion Neighborhood,John Anderson, 364-6086, Jacob Reeves, 515-1123
Bryant Neighborhood, Maha Barrani, 364-2114
Douglas Neighborhood, Cathey Dunn, 582-6804
East Liberty Neighborhood, Margaret Brady, 521-8377
Emerson Neighborhood, Annie Fletcher, 467-2706
University Neighborhood, Trisha Schelble, 583-7804, David Facer, 583=8368
cc: Planning Commission
City Council
Sugarhouse Community Council
East Central Community Council Membership Meeting
Wednesday,September 11,2002 Rolland Hall High School 843 South Lincoln Street
www ccnc-slc.org<http:/iwww.ccnc> (Site hosted by ArosNet)
AGENDA
7:00 PM Welcome and Announcements
Approval of Minutes
Treasurer's Report
Neighborhood Reports
Community Reports
7:30 South Temple Reconstruction- Pat Peterson.Salt Lake City Engineering
7:40 Property Rezone 1135 E 1700 S-Joel Paterson,Salt Lake City Planning
7:50 Minority Affairs-Archie Archuleta-Salt Lake City Mayor's Office
8:05 Carmen Pingree School-Penny Atkinson
8:15 District 4 School Board Candidates
8:35 Lane Striping 900 East @400 South-Jan Bartlett
9:00 Adjourn
Executive Board and Committee Reports
Chair,Dennis Guy-Sell,dadufo@aol.com 673-7378
Vice Chair,Andy Fletcher,007fletch@attbi.com 467-2706
Secretary,Kathy Scott,kaecorp@aros.net 322-5288
Treasury-Fran Schwab,schwabgroup@aol.com 581-9643 -
Past chair-Julia Robertson,julia.robertson@attbi.com 583-5663
Community Growth & Maintenance Committee Debora Wrathall deborawrathall@hsc utah.edu
363-3317
Land Use Coordinator Cindy Cromer cindyc@-vmh.com 355-4115
Master Plan Manager-Vicki Mickelsen vgmickelsen@mmtn.com
Moving People Committee Creed Haymond jchaymond@yahoo.com 583-8510
UTA Bus Improvement Liaison Lynn Martinez lmarime@doh.state.ut.us 582-8071
Senior Citizens Issues Committee-(position available)
Historic Neighborhood Committee-Jolie Pollet Strohmeyer strohmeyer@hotmail.com
Neighborhood Reports
Bennion John Anderson 364-6086& Jacob Reeves jacob.reeves@nsi2.com 515-1123
Bryant Maha Barrani markrrex@networld.com 364-2114
Douglas Cathey Dunn catheyd@weider.com 582-6804
East Liberty Margaret Brady mbrady@lib.utah.edu 521-8377
Emerson Annie and Andy Fletcher,007fletch@attbi.com 467-2706
University Trisha Schelbie pschelble@bigzoo.net 583-7804,David Facer dfacer@attbi.com 360-
7146
Community Reports
Mayor's Office-Scot Barraclough,District 4,535-6338 Barry Esham,District 5,
535-7971
City Council-Nancy Saxton,District 4,533-8185 Jill Remington-Love District 5,
535-7600
School Board-Joel Briscoe,District 4,583-2281 Janice Clemmer,District 5,583-
1012
SLC Police-Derek Coats,799-3425 SLC Fire-Ryan Miller,799-2404
Legislature-Rep_Scott Daniel,District 25,583-0801 Rep.Jackie Biskupski District
484-8369
Senate-Sen.Paula inlander,District 1,363-0868 Sen.Karen Hale,District 7,485-
SUGAR HOUS I t;
COMMUNITY COUNCIL •ittlf/A,
elk
Sugar House
Community Council
Ray Pugsley_Chair
Justin Jones,Vice Chair
Su Armitage,Vice Chair
Scott-Kisling,Vice Chair
Alice Edvalson, Secretary
Lynne Olson,Asst. Secretary
Kevan Adams,Asst.Secretary
Dolores Donohoo.Treasurer
September 10, 2002
Joel Paterson, Principal Planner
Salt Lake Planning Division
Salt Lake City Corporation
City and County Building, Room 406
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Re: Rezone for 1135 East 1700 South, Institutional to Residential
Dear Mr_ Paterson,
At our September 4 meeting, the Sugar House Community Council heard your
presentation regarding a proposal to rezone a property at 1135 East 1700 South from
Institutional to Residential 1-5000.
At the meeting, you explained this was an effort to correct an error made in 1995
when the whole City was rezoned. At that time, the LDS Church was trying to purchase
this property as part of the development of their new stake center on the corner of 11th
East and 17th South. The purchase did not occur, but in anticipation of the possibility,
this property was zoned as Institutional. The current owner has a home on the west
part of the property that is being used as a non-conforming duplex. The owner would
like to build a single-family home on the east part of the property, but cannot because
residential development is prohibited in an institutional zone. It is proposed that the lot
be changed to RI -5000 to be consistent with other properties in that area.
A motion was made that we approve the request to rezone this property to the
R1 -5000 zone. Discussion among trustees concerned the notification of surrounding
neighbors, and the possibility that this property might be desirable for commercial use_
Trustees voted to approved the rezoning, with voting 15 in favor, 0 opposed, 1
abstaining.
Sincerely,
CL:r ")v-/
Lynn�on, Correspondence Secretar
y
Sugar House Community Council
SUGAR IIOUS I-4, COMMUNITY
COUNCIL
1I
DATE: WEDNESDAY September 4, 2002 Sugar House - -
PLACE: SPRAGUE LIBRARY - 2131 South 1100 East Community Council
Ray Pugsley,Chau
TIME: 7:00 P.M. Jus,m Jones.Vice C hag
Su Armitage,Vice Chau
Scott K'sting,Vice Lhau
AGENDA Alice rd\alson_Secmetary
Lynne Olson Asst Scc
RayKevan Pugsley, Chair_ ConductingDooies darnohoc, t sS
voln,es Do�mnhcxm,Jea.urcr
7:00 -7:10 Welcome & Introductions, Minute Approval, Chair Report, Treasurers Report
7:10-7:20 Public Input
7:20-7:26 Police Update
7:26-7:30 Mayor's Office Update - Barry Esham
7:30-7:55 Neighborhood Recognition Awards
7:66-8:16 Planning Dept. Update - Melissa Anderson
CIP & CDBG Applications Update
Federal Funding for Transit-TEA-21 Reauthorization
8:16-8:26 Hidden Hollow Management Plan Approval - Lynne Olson
8:26 -8:36 Honorary Street Name Change -Susan Petheram
21st South -7th to 13th East to be called Sugar Ave.
8:36-8:60 1136 East 17th So., 2 parcels-rezone from institutional to R1-6000-Joel Paterson
8:60- 9:16 Organizational Issues:
New Trustee Petitions:
Michael Kavanagh -Westminster Neighborhood ��-•jib
Deedra Hansen Lambert-Highland Park Neighborhood
9 g umumu ninsu u
Grace Sperry -Forest Dale Neighborhood
SHCC Executive Election Candidates
"11111111111i 1111h -‘;6.
9:16 Adjourn
FUTURE MEETINGS:
October Agenda Deadline-September 13,2002-Call Alice Edvalson - 486-1663
SHCC Executive Meeting -September 16 2002-7:00 PM-Contact Alice for place
Next Community Council Meeting -October 2, 2002- 6:00 PM-Sprague Library (NOTE: an hour earlier to
hear from political candidates)
THE COMMUNITY COUNCIL MEETING IS THE FIRST WEDNESDAY OF EVERY MONTH
AT 7:00 PM -Sprague Branch Library
Questions: Call Chair Ray Pugsley -466-1181 Secretary Alice Edvalson -485-1663
Vice Chair Justin Jones-466-4160 Asst Sec. Lynne Olson -484-8352
Vice Chair Su Armitage -467-1708 Asst Sec. Kevan Adams -484-9153
Vice Chair Scott Kisling -484-7340 Treasurer Dolores Donohoo -485-0180
See us also on: http:l/www.slcgov.com/citizen/comm_councils/mins&agendas.htm OR
hhtp://www.ccnc-slc.org OR hhtp:llwww_sugar-house.org
'NOTE: If you are able to read the minutes and agenda on the Internet or are no longer interested in receiving
them please call Alice at 485-1663 and let us know so we can remove you from the mailing list. * *******"
,,
EXHIBIT 2
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 Novouiba 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
Paterson, Joel
From: Stewart, Brad
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:30 AM
To: Paterson,Joel
Cc: Cowles,Vicki; Garcia, Peggy
Subject: RE: Petition 400-02-29
Joel,
Salt Lake Public Utilities has no objection to the re-zoning of the subject property. There is water and sewer infrastructure
typical of the neighborhood and residential uses in 1700 South Street that is available for tte property.
Public Utilities wilt need to review the re-build plans for compliance with the current rules and regulations.
You may also be interested that this property is about 110 ft west of the Wasatch Fault Line.
Brad 6733
Original Message
From: Paterson,Joel
Sent: Thursday,September 12, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Larson, Bradley; Stewart, Brad; Orgill,Alicia
Subject: Petition 900-02-29
The property located at 1135 E. 1700 S_ consists of two lots, one occupied by a legal non-conforming duplex
and the other a vacant lot. Both lots are approximately 0.18 acres. The properly was incorrectly zoned
Institutional during the 1995 zoning rewrite process and the owner is requesting a zoning change to R-1-
5000 so a single-family dwelling can be constructed on the property. A vicinity map is attached.
One of the criteria that the City Council must consider as a part of a rezoning request is whether or not the
City Can provide adequate public services. Please review the request and let me know if the proposed
zoning change would affect the ability of your department to provide adequate service to this area.
Please respond to this request by September 20, 2002. I anticipate scheduling this petition with the Planning
Commission in October.
If you have questions,please contact me at 535-6141 or by e-mail at joeI.paterson@slcgov.com.
Thanks for your prompt attention to this matter.
<< Fite:Vicinity map jpg >> •
•
Paterson, Joel
From: Curt, Lynn
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Paterson, Joel
Subject: RE: Petition 400-02-29
Joel,
There was some property that was QCD'd to the City by the Church at the South West Corner of that Block. That made
the sidwell dimensions change a bit and adding them up they really don't go all the way to the corner of the block anymore.
Anyway, your description needs to go all the way to the corner like you describe but change the first dimension to "294.68
feet"and it will be correct.
LC
Original Message
From: Paterson,Joel
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Curt, Lynn
Subject: Petition 400-02-29
Lynn,
I am processing the above petition to rezone property at 1135 E. 1700 S. from Institutional to R-1-5000. Please check
the legal description so I can include it in an ordinance. I appreciate your help. The Sidwell#s are 16-17-258-031 and
-033.
Legal Description:
Beginning at a point 279.75 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 16-A, Five Acre Plat A, Big Field
Survey; thence east 103 feet; thence north 148.5 feet; thence west 103 feet; thence south 148.5 feet to the point of
beginning.
I appreciate your help.
Joel Paterson
1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PETITION 400-02-29
1135 E. 1700 South
Sidwell Parcel Numbers:
I 6-17-258-031
16-17-258-033
Beginning at a point 294.68 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 16-A,
Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey; thence east 103 feet; thence north 148.5 feet; thence
west 103 feet; thence south 148.5 feet to the point of beginning.
Paterson, Joel
From: Kirkwood, Brendon
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Paterson, Joel
Subject: RE-ZONING PETITION
JOEL,
AS FAR AS I CAN TELL I DO NOT SEE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE POLICE DEPT
REGARDING THIS PETITION_ IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROPERTY PLEASE
FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT ANY TIME. I CAN BE REACHED AT 799-3203_, THANKS_
DET. BRENDON KIRKWOOD
1
EXHIBIT 3
PETITION 400-02-29
Staff Report, Petition 400-02-29 November 21,2002
by Salt Lake City Planning Division
Mr. Joel G. Paterson,AICP Jul' 21, 2002
Senior Planner
Salt Lake City Planning Division
451 South State, Room 406
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Dear Joel.
Thanks for helping last Friday with this somewhat confusing zoning for the property located at 1 135
East 1700 South. "There are 2 lots there, one consumed by a legal non-confon using duplex and the
other a 50' wide vacant lot Apparently the current zoning is "Institutional"while the surrounding
zoning is R-1/5000. The surrounding land use is generally single family homes but the adjacent use
to the west and north is a relatively new church. At one time there were some apartments and
commercial uses leading up to the corner on I1`h East but they were bought out, and then demolished
to make way for the church.
My partner, John C.S. Koo,has held the vacant lot for some time and is now interested in building a
single family home. The lot is difficult to maintain, although it is partially fenced. As l was
investigating what the setbacks would be, in preparation for initiating the building permit process over
the next 6 to 9 months, I found out the Institutional Zone does not allow the single family home to be
built and probably does not allow for many land uses on the vacant lot.
When SLC did the massive rezoning in 1995, 1 would have thought that these properties should have
gotten a residential zone as opposed to the Institutional Zone. It appears to me that when you look at
the map, that we reviewed, that a mistake may have been made, because extending the east line of the
church zoning to 1700 South results in a less confusing square as opposed to a more irregular shape
for the zoning district.
To confuse this a bit more, I have a legal non-conforming letter that I got after the major rezonings
that says the property is zoned "Institutional". At the time, I guess that I was more interested in
affirming the status of the duplex than the long term implications of the zoning. So the letter I have
does not contradict the map in your office.
Never-the-less, I still believe the zone placed on the property was inappropriate,most likely a
"mistake". However, I also understand that I have not addressed it when I probably should have in
the past.
If this can be handled as a mistake on the map, I would sure appreciate that. If not,I will initiate the
rezone to R-1/5000, which seems to be in keeping with the neighborhood. Please let me know how to
proceed..
Sincerely,
John M. Janson,AICP
485-3375(Fridays), 963-3277(work)
jjanson4�Juno corn
2643 E 3120 S
SLC UT 84109
STE PHEN A. GOLDSMITH `�+' L e I •\ �41 i�+*'T�` � RPO '. �l.0�1:'; ROES C. ANDERSON
PLANNING DIPS ErOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAYOR
PLANNING DIVISION
BRENT B. WILDE
DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR
DOUGLAS L. WHEELWRIGHT, AICP
DEPUTY PLANNING DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: TO FILE 1135 EAST 1700 SOUTH
FROM: OEL G. PATERSON, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJE T: PETITION 400-02-29: REZONING OF TWO PARCELS FROM
INSTITUTIONAL TO R-1-500
DATE: AUGUST 16, 2002
INITIATION OF PETITION 400-02-29: On August 15, 2002, the Planning Commission
initiated a petition to change the zoning of 1135 E. 1700 S. from Institutional to R-1-
5000. The number assigned to this petition is 400-02-29.
BACKGROUND: John Janson inquired about changing the zoning on two parcels of
property at 1 135 East 1700 S. The parcels were zoned R-2 prior to the 1995 zoning
rewrite. The City changed the zoning to Institutional, apparently thinking that the parcels
were part of the LDS Church-owned property located immediately to the north and west.
Because of the length of time since the rewrite, the Salt Lake City Attorney's Office will
no longer allow a simple map change to fix the error. The Planning Division
management team decided to ask the Planning Commission to initiate a petition to
change the zoning so that the property owners do not have to pay the zoning amendment
application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
16-17-258-031
16-17-258-033
John Janson and John Koo
2643 E. 3120 S.
SLC,UT 84109
963-3277 (wk)
485-3375 (hrn)
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406,SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B4111
TELEPHONE:801-535-7757 FAX: BO1-535-61 74
A.�s , .uco o.ou
•
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
In Room 126 of the City & County Building
451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah
Thursday, August 15, 2002, 5:45p.m.
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 15, 2002
PAGE 2
Stephen Goldsmith commented on a memo from Joel Paterson to the Planning Commission
asking them to initiate rezoning of parcels from institutional to R-1-5000. The request for the
rezone is due to City error. If the rezone is initiated by the Planning Commission, the property
owner will not be required to pay the $500 zoning amendment fee.
Motion
Jeff Jonas moved to direct the Staff to initiate Joel Paterson's petition for a rezone as requested.
Peggy McDonough seconded the motion. Ms. Arnold, Mr. Chambless, Ms. Funk, Mr. Jonas,
Ms. McDonough, Mr. Muir, and Ms. Noda voted "Aye." John Diamond was not present. Robert
"Bip" Daniels, as chair, did not vote. The motion carried.
EXHIBIT 5c
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDAS/MINUTES
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
NOTE: The field trip is scheduled to leave at 4:00 p.m.
AGENDA FOR THE
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
In Room 126 of the City& County Building at 451 South State Street
Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 5:45 p.m.
The Planning Commission will be having dinner at 5:00 p.m., in Room 118. During the dinner, Staff may share
planning information with the Planning Commission. This portion of the meeting will be open to the public.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES from Thursday, November 7, 2002
2. LONG RANGE PLANNING ISSUES
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. PUBLIC HEARING at 5:50 p.m. — Petition No. 400-02-29, by the Salt Lake City Planning Commission,
Mr. Bip Daniels Chair, requesting to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map, by changing the zoning of two
parcels of the property located at 1135 East 1700 South from Institutional (I)to Residential (R-1-5,000).
(Staff—Joel Paterson at 535-6141)
b. PUBLIC HEARING at 6:15 p.m.— Petition No. 410-561, by Mountainview Landfill, Inc. (Formerly the
Bland Landfill), requesting a Conditional Use and Planned Development approval to increase the height
of an existing construction debris landfill from 150 feet to 205, and to allow a modification of the approved
landscaping plan and waive the 30 foot landscaped buffer requirement along the north and east property
lines. The property is located at 6975 West California Avenue (1300 South)in an Open Space "OS"/
Landfill Overlay "LO" zoning district. (Staff— Ray McCandless at 535-7282)
c. PUBLIC HEARING at 6:45 p.m.— Layton Avenue Planned Development Industrial Subdivision, by Mr.
Rex Stallings and Mr. Jack Clark, requesting approval for a four-lot industrial subdivision without frontage
on a public street, located at 810-900 West Layton Avenue and 1839 South 900 West. The area is
zoned Light Manufacturing District "M-1". (Staff-Jackie Gasparik at 535-6354)
d. PUBLIC HEARING at 7:15 p.m.— Petition No. 400-01-37,from Overland Development, represented by
Ken Holman, requesting to rezone the properties located at 326-348 South 600 East and 550-558 East
300 South,from RO and RMF-35 to R-MU, Residential Mixed use zoning district.
The petitioner is also requesting approval of revised plans for, Petition 410-584, a Planned Development.
The property is generally located on the block from 300 to 400 South and 500 to 600 East, in a
Residential Mixed-Use R-MU zoning district. (Staff— Doug Dansie at 535-6182)
4. OTHER BUSINESS
Salt Lake City Corporation complies with all ADA guidelines. If you are planning to attend the public meeting and,due to a
disability,need assistance in understanding or participating in the meeting,please notify the City 48 hours in advance of the
meeting and we will try to provide whatever assistance may be required. Please call 535-7757 for assistance.
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS BEFORE THE MEETING BEGINS. AT YOUR
REQUEST A SECURITY ESCORT WILL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMPANY YOU TO YOUR CAR AFTER THE
MEETING. THANK YOU.
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT•PLANNING DIVISION•451 SOUTH STATE STREET,ROOM 406•SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84111
TELEPHONE:801-535-7757•FAX:801-535-6174
SALT LAKE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
In Room 126 of the City &County Building
451 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah
Thursday, November 21, 2002, 5:30p.m.
Present from the Planning Commission were Chair Jeff Jonas, Tim Chambless, Robert"Bip"
Daniels, Aria Funk, Prescott Muir, Jennifer Seelig. Kay (berger)Arnold entered the meeting at
6:55 p.m. to ensure a quorum after having been excused from the meeting. John Diamond,
Peggy McDonough, and Laurie Noda were not present.
Present from the Planning Staff were Acting Planning Director Brent Wilde; Deputy Planning
Director Doug Wheelwright; Planning Program Supervisor Cheri Coffey; and Planners Joel
Paterson, Jackie Gasparik, and Ray McCandless
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PUBLIC HEARING - Petition No. 400-02-29, by the Salt Lake City Planning Commission,
Mr. Bip Daniels Chair, requesting to amend the Salt Lake City zoning map, by changing
the zoning of two parcels of the property located at 1135 East 1700 South from
Institutional (I)to Residential (R-1-5000).
Planner Joel Paterson reviewed the petition as written in the Staff report. He explained that,
prior to 1995, these two parcels and the surrounding residential area were zoned R-2, and the
strip along 1100 East was zoned B-3, which is neighborhood commercial shopping district. In
1995, the entire city was rezoned, and it appears that the City made an error in zoning these
two parcels. The western parcel has a legal, non-conforming duplex, and the eastern parcel is
currently vacant. When one of the property owners came to the City to ask about building a
single-family home on the vacant lot, the error was discovered, and the Staff requested that the
Planning Commission initiate this petition. Mr. Paterson noted that the surrounding property is
zoned R-1-5000, and the Staff is recommending that the zone include these two parcels. He
noted that the petition was reviewed by the East Central Community Council and Sugar House
Community Council, and both voted unanimously in favor of the petition. Mr. Paterson stated
that he has received a number of phone calls from people who were afraid that the institutional
zoning would allow other types of uses. Re-zoning the property to R-1-5000 is consistent with
the area, and the Staff recommended changing the zoning on these two parcels from
Institutional to R-1-5000.
Planning Commission Meeting 1 November 21, 2002
John Janson, the applicant, stated that he and his partner have owned the lots for more than 20
years. He was aware that the property was zoned institutional but thought a single-family home
could be built on it, so he did not protest when the property was rezoned in 1995. When he
came to the City this summer to discuss building requirements, he found that the institutional
zoning would prohibit him from building a home. He stated that he supported the Staffs
recommendation.
Chair Jonas opened the public hearing.
There was no comment.
Chair Jonas closed the public hearing.
Motion for Petition 400-02-29
Aria Funk moved to forward a favorable recommendation to the City Council for Petition 400-02-
29 to change the zoning of the property located at 1135 East 1700 South from Institutional to R-
1-5000, based on the findings of fact. Robert"Bip" Daniels seconded the motion.
Findings of Fact
A. The proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with the purposes, goals,
objectives, and policies of the adopted general plan of Salt Lake City.
B_ The proposed amendment is harmonious with the overall character of existing
development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.
C_ Changing the zoning of the property at 1135 East 1700 South will generate no adverse
effect on adjacent properties.
D. Residential development is consistent with the provisions of the Groundwater Source
Protection Overlay. Any new development would be limited to the land uses allowed in
the R-1-5000 district and would be compatible with surrounding land uses.
E. Amending the zoning map will have no adverse effect on existing public facilities or the
City's ability to provide public services.
Mr. Chambless, Mr. Daniels, Ms. Funk, Mr. Muir, and Ms. Seelig voted "Aye." Ms. Arnold, Mr.
Diamond, Ms. McDonough, and Ms. Noda were not present. Jeff Jonas, as chair, did not vote.
The motion carried.
Planning Commission Meeting 2 November 21, 2002
EXHIBIT 6
PUBLIC COMMENT
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
East Central Community Council Membership Meeting
Wednesday,September I I,2002 Rowland Hall High School 843 South Lincoln Street
www ccnc-slc org<httpl/www ccnc> (Site hosted b) ArosNet)
AGENDA
7:00 PM Welcome and Announcements
Approval of Minutes
Treasurer's Report
Neighborhood Reports
Community Reports
7:30 South Temple Reconstruction-Pat Peterson,Salt Lake City Engineering
7:40 Property Rezone 1135 E 1700 S-Joel Paterson,Salt Lake City Planning
7:50 Minority Affairs-Archie Archuleta-Salt Lake City Mayor's Office
8:05 Carmen Pingree School- Penny Atkinson
8:15 District 4 School Board Candidates
8:35 Lane Striping 900 East @400 South-Jan Bartlett
9:00 Adjourn
Executive Board and Committee Reports
Chair,Dennis Guy-Sell,dadufo@aol.com 673-7378
Vice Chair,Andy Fletcher,007fletch@atibi.com 467-2706
Secretary,Kathy Scott,kaecorp@aros.net 322-5288
Treasury- Fran Schwab,schwahgroup@aol.com 581-9643
Past chair-Julia Robertson,julia robertson@attbi.com 583-5663
Community Growth& Maintenance Committee Debora Wrathall debora.wrathalt(o:hsc utah.edu
363-3317
Land Use Coordinator Cindy Cromer cmdyc@vmh.com 355-4115
Master Plan Manager-Vicki Mickelsen vgmickelsen@mmm corn
Moving People Committee Creed Haymond jchaymond@yahoo corn 583-8510
UTA Bus Improvement Liaison Lynn Martinez lmartine@dohstale.ut us 582-8071
Senior Citizens Issues Committee- (position available)
Historic Neighborhood Committee-Jobe Pollet Strobmeyer strohmeyer@hotmail.corn
Neizhborhood Reports
Bennion John Anderson 364-6086& Jacob Reeves jacob.reeves@nsi2.com 515-1123
Bryant Maha Barrani markrrexietworld.com 364-2114
Douglas Cathey Dunn catheyd@weider_com 582-6804
East Liberty Margaret Brady mbrady@hb.utah.edu 521-8377
Emerson Annie and Andy Fletcher,007fletch@attbi_com 467-2706
University Trisha Schelble pschelble@bigzoo.net 583-7804,David Facer dfacer@attbi.com 360-
7146
Community Reports •
Mayor's Office-Scot Barr aclough,District 4,535-6338 Barry Esham,District 5,
535-7971
City Council-Nancy Saxton,District 4,533-8185 Jill Remington-Love District 5,
535-7600
School Board-Joel Briscoe,District 4,583-2281 Janice Clernmer,District 5,583-
1012
SLC Police-Derek Coats,799-3425 SLC Fire-Ryan Miller,799-2404
Legislature-Rep.Scott Daniel,District 25,583-0801 Rep.Jackie Biskupski District
484-8369
Senate-Sen.Paula inlander,District 1,363-0868 Sen.Karen Dale,District 7,485-
September 16, 2002
East Central Community Council
436 South I200 East
Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Salt Lake City Corporation
Planning Department
451 South State Street
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Attention: Joel Paterson
Subject: Rezoning 1 135 East 1700 South
Dear Joel,
"Thank you for attending the September General Meeting of the East Central Community Council
to discuss the error in zoning at 1 135 East 1 700 South and the plan to rezone the property from
Institutional to R1/5000.
A motion was passed without dissent:1) To support the rezone of the properly from Institutional
to R 1/5000, and 2) To request that the City proceed in an expedited manner to accomplish this
rezone so as to minimize any further delay for the property owners.
Again, thank you for bringing this issue to the attention of the East Central Community Council
and involving the community in the decision process_
Respectfully,
Chair, Dennis Guy-Sell, 673-7378
Vice Chair, Andy Fletcher, 467-2706
Secretary, Kathy Scott, 322-5288
Treasurer, Fran Schwab, 581-9643
Past Chair, Julia Robertson, 583-5663
Land Use Coordinator, Cindy Cromer, 355-4115
Master PIan Coordinator, Vicki Mickelsen
Moving People Committee, Creed Raymond, 583-8510
Historic Neighborhood Coordinator, Jolie Pollet, 328-4336
Bennion Neighborhood, John Anderson, 364-6086, Jacob Reeves, 515-1 123
Bryant Neighborhood,Maha Barrani, 364-2114
Douglas Neighborhood, Cathey Dunn, 582-6804
East Liberty Neighborhood, Margaret Brady, 521-8377
Emerson Neighborhood,Annie Fletcher, 467-2706
University Neighborhood, Trisha Schelble, 583-7804, David Facer, 583-8368
cc: Planning Commission
City Council
Sugarhouse Community Council
`/D-f_A r f �! .
SUGAR HOUSE COMMUNITY
COUNCIL 4/
DATE: WEDNESDAY September 4, 2002 Sugar House
PLACE: SPRAGUE LIBRARY - 2131 South 1100 East Community Council
Ray Pugsley,Char
TIME: 7:00 P.M. lnsim Jones Vnz('hat;
Su Armitage,Vice Chan
Scott K u ling,V ecc C hau
AGENDA Ahcc rdsalson Secretary
Lynne Olson Ass, Scc
Kccan Adams,Asst Sec
Ray Pugsley, Chair. Conducting Doh,cs Donohoe,1reasurn
7:00-7:10 Welcome & Introductions, Minute Approval, Chair Report, Treasurers Report
7:10- 7:20 Public Input
7:20- 7:26 Police Update
7:25- 7:30 Mayor's Office Update - Barry Esham
7:30-7:66 Neighborhood Recognition Awards
7:65- 8:16 Planning Dept. Update- Melissa Anderson
C{P & CDBG Applications Update
Federal Funding for Transit-TEA-21 Reauthorization
8:16- 8:26 Hidden Hollow Management Plan Approval - Lynne Olson
8:26-8:35 Honorary Street Name Change - Susan Petheram
21st South - 7th to 13th East to be called Sugar Ave_
8:36-8:60 1136 East 17th So., 2 parcels -rezone from institutional to R1-5000-Joel Paterson
8:60- 9:16 Organizational Issues:
New Trustee Petitions:
Michael Kavanagh -Westminster Neighborhood m*-7i
Deedra Hansen Lambert- Highland Park Neighborhood ��W` 7.>
9 $ ult wnutummu eun
Grace Sperry - Forest Dale Neighborhood
SHCC Executive Election Candidates
t Illllllllfill!lQ11,lai•
_j!f
9:15 Adjourn
FUTURE MEETINGS:
October Agenda Deadline-September 13, 2002 - Call Alice Edvalson - 485-1663
SHCC Executive Meeting -September 16 2002 -7:00 PM-Contact Alice for place
Next Community Council Meeting - October 2, 2002-6:00 PM-Sprague Library (NOTE: an hour earlier to
hear from political candidates)
THE COMMUNITY COUNCIL MEETING IS THE FIRST WEDNESDAY OF EVERY MONTH
AT 7:00 PM - Sprague Branch Library
Questions: Call Chair Ray Pugsley -466-1181 Secretary Alice Edvalson -485-1663
Vice Chair Justin Jones-466-4160 Asst Sec. Lynne Olson -484-8352
Vice Chair Su Armitage -467-1708 Asst. Sec. Kevan Adams -484-9153
Vice Chair Scott Kisting -484-7340 Treasurer Dolores Donohoo-485-0180
See us also on: http://www.slcgov.com/citizenfcomm_councilslmins&agendas.htm OR
hhtp:ilwww.ccnc-ste.org OR hhtp:I/www_sugar-house.org
'"'"'NOTE If you are able to read the minutes and agenda on the internet or are no longer interested in receiving
them please call Alice at 486-1663 and let us know so we can remove you from the mailing list. '*****.'
SUGAR HOUSE
vi7,41
COMMUNITY COUNCIL IBLAitt
Sugar House
Community Council
Ray Pugsley.Chair
Justin Jones.Vice Chair
Su Armitage,Vice Chair
Scott--Kisling,Vice Chair
Alice Edvalson,Secretary
Lynne Olson,Asst.Secretary
Kevan Adams,Asst. Secretary
Dolores Donohoo_Treasurer
September 10, 2002
Joel Paterson, Principal Planner
Salt Lake Planning Division
Salt Lake City Corporation
City and County Building, Room 406
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Re: Rezone for 1135 East 1700 South, Institutional to Residential
Dear Mr. Paterson,
At our September 4 meeting, the Sugar House Community Council heard your
presentation regarding a proposal to rezone a property at 1135 East 1700 South from
Institutional to Residential 1-5000_
At the meeting, you explained this was an effort to correct an error made in 1995
when the whole City was rezoned_ At that time, the LDS Church was trying to purchase
this property as part of the development of their new stake center on the corner of 11th
East and 17th South. The purchase did not occur, but in anticipation of the possibility,
this property was zoned as Institutional. The current owner has a home on the west
part of the property that is being used as a non-conforming duplex. The owner would
like to build a single-family home on the east part of the property, but cannot because
residential development is prohibited in an Institutional zone. It is proposed that the lot
be changed to RI -5000 to be consistent with other properties in that area.
A motion was made that we approve the request to rezone this property to the
R1 -5000 zone. Discussion among trustees concerned the notification of surrounding
neighbors, and the possibility that this property might be desirable for commercial use.
Trustees voted to approved the rezoning, with voting 15 in favor, 0 opposed, 1
abstaining_
Sincerely,
OLd
Lynn�on, Correspondence Secretary
Sugar House Community Council
EXHIBIT 7
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
Transmittal of Petition 400-02-28
January 30,2003
• Paterson, Joel
From: Stewart, Brad
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9-30 AM
To: Paterson, Joel
Cc: Cowles, Vicki; Garcia, Peggy
Subject: RE: Petition 400-02-29
Joel,
Salt Lake Public Utilities has no objection to the re-zoning of the subject property. There is water and sewer infrastructure
typical of the neighborhood and residential uses in 1700 South Street that is available for tile property.
Public Utilities wilt need to review the re-build plans for compliance with the current rules and regulations.
You may also be interested that this property is about 110 ft west of the Wasatch Fault Line.
Brad 6733
Original Message
From: Paterson, Joel
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Larson, Bradley; Stewart, Brad; Orgill, Alicia
Subject: Petition 400-02-29
The property located at 1135 E. 1700 S. consists of two lots, one occupied by a legal non-conforming duplex
and the other a vacant lot. Both lots are approximately 0.i 8 acres. The properly was incorrectly zoned
Institutional during the 1995 zoning rewrite process and the owner is requesting a zoning change to R-1-
5000 so a single-family dwelling can be constructed on the property. A vicinity map is attached.
One of the criteria that the City Council must consider as a part of a rezoning request is whether or not the
City Can provide adequate public services- Please review the request and let me know if the proposed
zoning change would affect the ability of your department to provide adequate service to this area.
Please respond to this request by September 20, 2002. 1 anticipate scheduling this petition with the Planning
Commission in October_
If you have questions,please contact me at 535-6141 or by e-mail at joel.paterson@slcgov.com.
Thanks for your prompt attention to this matter.
« File: Vicinity map jpg>>
t
Paterson, Joel
From: Curt, Lynn
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:13 PM
To: Paterson, Joel
Subject: RE: Petition 400-02-29
Joel,
There was some property that was QCD'd to the City by the Church at the South West Corner of that Block. That made
the sidwell dimensions change a bit and adding them up they really don't go all the way to the corner of the block anymore.
Anyway, your description needs to go all the way to the corner like you describe but change the first dimension to"294.68
feet" and it will be correct.
LC
Original Message
From: Paterson,Joel
Sent: Thursday,September 12, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Curt, Lynn
Subject: Petition 4100-02-29
Lynn,
I am processing the above petition to rezone property at 1135 E. 1700 S. from Institutional to R-1-5000. Please check
the legal description so I can include it in an ordinance- I appreciate your help. The Sidwell#s are 16-17-258-031 and
-033.
Legal Description:
Beginning at a point 279.75 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 16-A, Five Acre Plat A, Big Field
Survey; thence east 103 feet; thence north 148.5 feet; thence west 103 feet; thence south 148.5 feet to the point of
beginning.
l appreciate your help.
Joel Paterson
1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PETITION 400-02-29
1135 E. 1700 South
Sidwell Parcel Numbers:
16-17-258-031
16-17-258-033
Beginning at a point 294.68 feet east from the southwest corner of Lot 2, Block 16-A,
Five Acre Plat A, Big Field Survey; thence east 103 feet; thence north 148.5 feet; thence
west 103 feet; thence south 148.5 feet to the point of beginning.
Paterson, Joel
From: Kirkwood, Brendon
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:49 PM
To: Paterson, Joel
Subject: REZONING PETITION
JOEL,
AS FAR AS I CAN TELL I DO NOT SEE ANY SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE POLICE DEPT
REGARDING THIS PETITION_ IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS PROPERTY PLEA:1-
FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME AT ANY TIME- I CAN BE REACHED AT 799-3203,, THANKS.
DET. BRENDON KIRKWOOD
i
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 15,2003
SUBJECT: Petition No.400-02-29—Request to rezone two lots located at 1135 East 1700
South from Institutional to Residential R-1-5000
AFFECTED COUNCIL
DISTRICTS: If adopted,the ordinance will affect Council Districts 5 and 7
STAFF REPORT BY: Janice Jardine,Planning Policy Analyst
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Community and Economic Development—Planning Division
AND CONTACT PERSON: Joel Paterson, Senior Planner
KEY ELEMENTS:
A. This is a request to rezone two lots located at 1135 East 1700 South from Institutional to Residential R-1-
5000.The Administration notes that this action would correct a zoning error made during the 1995 zoning
rewrite project. The lots apparently were considered part of church-owned properties located immediately
to the north and west. The subject properties are owned jointly by Mr.John Janson and Mr.John Koo. One
lot contains a legal non-conforming duplex and the other lot is currently vacant. Prior to the 1995 zoning
rewrite project,the two properties were zoned Residential R-2 that allowed low-density single-family and
duplex residential uses.
B. Properties to the east and south are zoned Residential R-1-5000 and contain a mix of low-density residential
uses. The property directly north and west is zoned Institutional and is occupied by a church.The properties
are also zoned with a Groundwater Source Protection Overlay classification. If the properties are rezoned
the Overlay district zoning would remain the same.
C. In a letter to Planning staff dated July 21,2002 and at the Planning Commission hearing on November 21,
2002,Mr.Janson noted:
1. He and his partner(Mr. Koo)have owned the lots for more than 20 years.
2. He was aware that the property was proposed to be rezoned Institutional in 1995 but thought a single-
Family home would be permitted.
3. In preparing to apply for a residential building permit,he became aware that residential uses are not
permitted in the Institutional zoning classification.
4. In reviewing the zoning map,he noted that it appears that a mistake was made because extending the
east line of the Institutional zoning to 1700 South would result in a less confusing shape(boundary)for
the zoning district.
D. The Administration's transmittal and Planning staff report provide a detailed discussion of the proposed
rezoning.The Planning staff report provides findings of fact that support the criteria established in the City's
Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 21A.50.050-Standards for General Zoning Amendments. Please refer to the
Page 1
•
Planning staff report for specific findings of fact and discussion of compliance with individual standards.
The Planning staff report notes that due to the length of time that has passed since the 1995 zoning was
enacted,the City Attorney's office has determined that Administrative zoning map adjustments are no
longer appropriate. (Please refer to the Administration's paperwork for additional details.)
E. On November 21,2002,the Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council to rezone the properties. No issues or concerns were expressed at the Planning Commission
meeting.
F. The public process included review by the Central City and Sugar House Community Councils and written
notification of the Planning Commission hearing to property owners within a 300-foot radius of the
proposed rezoning. Both Community Councils voted to support the rezoning requests. Discussion noted by
the Sugar House Community Council related to notification of surrounding neighbors and the possibility
that this property might be desirable for commercial use.
MASTER PLAN& POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:
A. The 1974 Central Community Development Plan recommends low-density residential land uses for this
area. The Master Plan notes the following principles:
1. Revitalize and stabilize inner-city neighborhoods.
2. Recognize mixed-use areas and their relative permanence.
3. Establish neighborhood revitalization as a remedy for obsolescence and decline.
B. The Council has adopted housing policy statements that support creating a wide variety of housing types
citywide. The policy statements are included in the City's Community Housing Plan. The policy statements
address a variety of issues including quality design,public and neighborhood participation and interaction,
transit-oriented development,encouraging mixed-use developments,housing preservation,rehabilitation
and replacement,zoning policies and programs that preserve housing opportunities as well as business
opportunities.
C. The Council's growth policy notes that growth in Salt Lake City will be deemed the most desirable if it
meets the following criteria:
1. Is aesthetically pleasing;
2. Contributes to a livable community environment;
3. Yields no negative net fiscal impact unless an overriding public purpose is served;and
4. Forestalls negative impacts associated with inactivity.
D. The City's Strategic Plan and the Futures Commission Report express concepts such as maintaining a
prominent sustainable city,ensuring the City is designed to the highest aesthetic standards and is pedestrian
friendly,convenient,and inviting,but not at the expense of minimizing environmental stewardship or
neighborhood vitality. The Plans emphasize placing a high priority on maintaining and developing new
affordable residential housing in attractive,friendly, safe environments and creating attractive conditions for
business expansion including retention and attraction of large and small businesses.
Page 2
CHRONOLOGY:
> BACKGROUND
The Administration's transmittal provides a chronology of events relating to the rezoning process.
Please refer to the Administration's chronology for details. Key meeting dates are listed below.
➢ KEY DATES
• September 11,2002 East Central Community Council meeting
• September 4, 2002 Sugar House Community Council meeting
• November 21, 2002 Planning Commission meeting
cc: Rocky Fluhart,Dave Nimkin,DJ Baxter,Ed Rutan,Lynn Pace,Alison Weyher,David Dobbins,Roger Evans,
Louis Zunguze,Brent Wilde,Enzo Calfa,Cheri Coffey,Joel Paterson,Jaime Neilson,Barry Esham
File Location: Community and Economic Development Department,Planning Division,Rezoning,
1135 East 1700 South
Page 3
M
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 18,2003
SUBJECT: Water Conservation Rate Structure
AFFECTED COUNCIL DISTRICTS: All Districts
STAFF REPORT BY: Gary Mumford
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Department of Public Utilities
AND CONTACT PERSON: LeRoy Hooton
•
KEY ELEMENTS:
At the Council's request,the Department of Public Utilities has provided a schedule of potential
future water rate increases. The Council has already approved three annual rate increases of 3%
relating to a new water treatment facility and other improvements to be constructed by the
Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy. In addition to these rate increases,the
Department has indicated that additional rate increases may be advisable beginning in July 2004 to
accelerate the replacement of City infrastructure and to finance annual assessments to the
Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy that will begin incrementally in fiscal year
2004-05. The Department is not suggesting that the Council take any action at this time relating to
future rate increases. The Department of Public Utilities provided a nine-year financial projection
cash flow schedule as part of the Department's budget presentation package.
Potential Water Rate Increases
Budget Year City Council Approved Potential Additional Rate
Increases Increases
2003-2004 3%
2004-2005 3% 6%
2005-2006 3% 6%
2006-2007 8%
2007-2008 9%
2008-2009 6%
2009-2010 6%
2010-2011 7%
2011-2012 7%
Total 9% 55%
The Council may wish to discuss several other water rate matters including:
• Number of units of water in the first block for residential customers
• Rate differential proposed for County customers
• Abatement program for the needy
• Number of units of water in the second block for residential customers
• Any other questions that Council Members may have regarding the proposed water rates
for commercial/industrial,irrigation,or residential customers
w �
• Time line for community meetings including possible date for public hearing
(Note: The Department of Public Utilities proposes that the new rates become effective on
June 1st in order to encourage water conservation throughout the entire irrigation season.
The Council may wish to hold a public hearing and consider adopting a rate structure in
April to allow the Department time for implementation. The Department of Public Utilities
has been meeting with community councils about the proposed rate structure.)
MATTERS AT ISSUE:
1. Number of units of water in the first block for residential customers-At the briefing on
February 6,some Council Members discussed the option of increasing the number of units of
water that would be priced at the first block. (Note: Each unit of water is 100 cubic feet or 748
gallons.) The transmittal discusses the effect of increasing the first rate block for residential
customers to include sufficient water for indoor use for a greater percentage of customers. The
9 units of water that are proposed to be priced at the lowest rate are sufficient to provide
indoor water use for 58.2%of the customers;10 units meets 62.2%of customers indoor needs;
11 unit 65.6%;13 units 70.5%;and 16 units satisfy 75%of customers indoor water consumption.
In answer to the Council question the Department has prepared an alternative proposal of 13
units with increase of 1 cent to the second block rate. The Department projects that$800,000 of
revenue would result from the 1 cent increase,which would offset$800,000 that would be lost
from increasing from 9 to 13 units the amount of water priced in the first block. The Council
may wish to provide tentative direction to the Department so that the Department can disseminate
impact information prior to the Council's public hearing.
2. Rate differential proposed for County customers-The consultant's study recommends
adjusting the multiplier for customers outside of City limits from 1.5 times the in-City rates to
1.35 times the in-City rates. About 36%of the City's water customers are located outside the
City limits(53,854 City accounts;30,601 County accounts). The Department of Public Utilities
desires to schedule briefings on the proposed rate structure with community councils in the County
service area and would like to receive some indication as to whether the Council is generally in
agreement in accepting the 1.35 multiplier.
3. Abatement program for the needy-The Department proposes to continue the abatement
program of granting a$4.33 monthly water abatement to those customers that qualify for and
are granted abatements for taxes on their dwellings by the County as allowed by the state code.
Individuals that are 65 or older,who own and occupy a residence,and with household income
and cash/investments of less than$24,245 are generally eligible. The Department of Public
Utilities is not proposing an increase to the water abatement amount. There are 2,430
customers that currently receive water abatements. This program costs the Water Fund
approximately$126,000 annually. The Council may wish to discuss whether the dollar amount of the
abatement is appropriate.
2
r .4
4. Number of units of water in the second block for residential customers-The second block of
water for residential customers(up to 29 units of water)is intended to represent an allowance
for efficient outside irrigation systems and appropriate irrigation practices. According to the
Department,an average single-family residential customer uses 32 units of water during the
summer months of June through September. This average was calculated by dividing the total
water used by all single-family residential customers during the four summer months(June
through September)in 2000 by the total number of customers in this class and dividing by four
to get an average usage per month. The average doesn't represent the highest or peak usage
during the summer,but the average for all four summer months. There are customers with
very small lots within certain sections of the City and customers with very large lots within
certain sections of the City. In various neighborhoods of the City,it is not unusual to have
many customers that have peak month water usage in the summer of close to 100 units. The
Council may wish to discuss whether 29 units are the appropriate allowance for the second block.
5. Rates for commercial/industrial,irrigation and residential customers-The Council has many
if not unlimited options for setting customer rates. The Council may wish to discuss the proposed
rate structures and determine whether the Council would like additional information or briefings
regarding any of the proposed rates or block sizes.
The following information was provided to the Council previously.
It is provided again for your reference.
Residential Customers-A seasonal inclining block approach is proposed for residential
customers. The average annual residential water bill will increase approximately$31 from$224 to
$254,which is a 13.65%increase.
•RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
Current Rates Proposed Rate Structure
(including 3%increase on 7/1/03)
Current winter rates $0.61
per 100 cubic feet(748 gallons)
Current summer rates $0.93
per 100 cubic feet
Block 1: Up to 900 cubic $0.72
feet per 100 cubic feet
Block 2: From 900 cubic $1.10
feet to 2900 cubic feet per 100 cubic feet
Block 3: Excess of 2900 $1.53
cubic feet per 100 cubic feet
3
A ,
•
Industrial and Commercial Customers-The Department of Public Utilities recommends an
average winter consumption approach for industrial and commercial accounts(including
condominium and apartment complexes).
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL WATER RATES
Current Rates Proposed Rate Structure
(including 3%increase for 7/1/03)
Current winter rates $0.61
per 100 cubic feet
Current summer rates
per 100 cubic feet
Block 1:Up to 100%of $0.72
average winter per 100 cubic feet
consumption
Block 2:100%to 300%of $1.10
average winter per 100 cubic feet
consumption
Block 3:Excess of 300%of $1.53
winter consumption per 100 cubic feet
Water budget for irrigation accounts-The Department of Public Utilities recommends a target
budget approach for irrigation-only accounts. The formula for the target will be based on a the
number of factors such as amount of square feet of irrigated area,type of vegetation,historic
monthly evapotranspiration index,irrigation system efficiency and other items. Irrigation
customers may exceed the target budget unless they have efficient irrigation systems and
implement appropriate site management practices. The proposed rates establish a cost incentive to
upgrade irrigation systems. Irrigation customers may see an increase to their water costs,but it is
difficult to predict the actual increase percentage.
IRRIGATION CUSTOMERS
Current Rates Proposed by Subcommittee
(including 3%increase for 7/1/03) and Advisory Committee
Current rates $0.93
per 100 cubic feet of water
Block 2:Up to target $1.10
budget per 100 cubic feet of water
Block 3:Excess of target $1.53
budget per 100 cubic feet of water
Monthly minimum charge-The City's current water rates include a monthly service charge that
not only recovers costs of reading and maintaining meters,but also indudes an allocation of 500
cubic feet of water(3,740 gallons). The proposed water rates eliminate this water allocation so that
conservation begins with the very first gallon of water used. This proposal is also more equitable
to those households with only one or two occupants that don't use 3,740 gallons every month.
Under the proposal,the monthly service charge for a residential customer would be reduced from
$8.90 to$5.62. Therefore,under the proposed structure,the combined service charge and cost for
the first 500 cubic feet of water will be$9.22.
4
r
•
Demand charge-The City's current water rates for industrial and commercial customers includes
a demand charge based on the size of the water meter. The consultant concluded that the demand
charge could not be justified. This recommendation will reduce the monthly service charge for
industrial customers,condominium and apartment complexes,and for most commercial
customers. For example,the proposal reduces the monthly service fee for a three-inch meter from
$71.62 to$13.04 and reduces the fee for a four-inch meter from$109.99 to$14.02.
Expanded "summer months"-The three-tiered inclining price structure is proposed for
the months of April through October. A flat rate (first-tier rate) is proposed for winter-
month consumption (November through March). The current summer rates are in effect
during June through September.
CC: Rocky Fluhart,David Nimkin,LeRoy Hooton,Jeff Niermeyer,Jim Lewis,Stephanie Duer,Rick Giardina,DJ Baxter
•
Original Message
From: Lewis, Jim
Sent:Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:52 PM
To: Mumford, Gary
Cc: Hooton, Leroy; Niermeyer, Jeff; Duer, Stephanie; Reynolds, Florence
Subject: RE:Water operating reduction to offset revenue shortfall from conservation
Gary& City Council
I appreciate this opportunity to share with the Council some of the budget reductions and changes which
have been implemented over the past few years.
1. The Department of Public Utilities has always prepared a very conservative budget based on
conservative revenue estimates and operating costs based on average water years.
2. Over the years the Water Utility has consistently reduced the number of full time equivalent employees
while maintaining excellent service to our customers.The attached worksheet shows the number of
employees from 1979 to the proposed budget for 2004.You will notice that the number of FTE's have
decreased by 55.4 over the period of 25 years while the number of service connections have increased
by 18%from 76,821 to 91,390. We are currently operating an 18% larger water system today with 17%
fewer employees.
3. Due to the effect of the fourth year of the drought the Department implemented a soft hiring freeze this
last August which allowed the Department to reduce an additional 2.5 employees during the current
budget year and reduced our proposed budget for next year.
4. Due to the effect of the drought the Department during the current budget year has reduced operating
costs by reducing travel, limiting equipment purchases, delaying fleet purchases except for emergencies,
and has delayed the construction of the City Creek Water Treatment Plant which was scheduled to start
this spring.
5. As in any proposed budget there are a few programs which could be considered non core or non
emergency programs.
a. The proposed budget includes$ 30,000 for landscaping improvements at the Day Riverside Detention
Basin next to the Library,
b. Included in the budget is$30,000 for landscaping improvements at our Administrative Building to
show the Public proper landscaping options.
c. The budget includes funding for the watershed education program in the amount of$165,000.
d. The budget includes$168, 282 for our water conservation program to help educate our customers on
water conservation.
e. The proposed budget includes funding to continue our very successful safety incentive program in the
amount of$40,000.
Budget changes above those listed would effect our ability to meet current service levels.
6. The proposed rate increase of 3%was approved by the City Council to fund the future water
assessment to the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy.The elimination of that increase
would not allow us to have proper funding to make the established payment starting in 2005 of$3.5
million or the higher amount in 2006 of$7 million.
7. In addition there are a few items which where not included in the proposed budget:
a. Additional security measures and security systems, which might be required as we prepare for possible
terrorism attacks
b. Additional employees to help handle the increase in phone calls and services required by the
implementation of the new rate structure.
8. We would encourage a full review of our budget and operating costs by the City Council staff.
Jim Lewis
Original Message—
From: Mumford, Gary
Sent:Tuesday, March 18, 2003 8:57 PM
To: Hooton, Leroy
LeRoy,
One of the Council Members suggested that the Water Utility Fund absorb a portion of the loss of
revenue from conservation. My understanding is that you are projecting an 8%decline in water use as a
result of conservation. Is the Department absorbing a portion of this decrease? Can you share with the
Council some of the operating reductions over the past few years and the extent of your analysis or
search for operating reductions in preparing your proposed Water Utility budget for FY04?
3/19/2003
MANDOC,XLS
MANNING SUMMARY
BY FISCAL YEAR
FULL TIME&FULL TIME EQUIVALENT POSITIONS
APPRO PROPOSED
NUMBER DESCRIPTION 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 D8 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
WATER UTILITY
5101 SOURCE OF SUPPLY 11.00 11.00 12.00 14.00 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 11.03 12.03 13.23 13.23 14.23 1423 14.23 13.23 13.25 13.25 13.25 13.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.75
5103 POWER&PUMPING 11.00 11.00 11.00 14.00 6.40 5.40 5.40 5.40 5.40 5.40 6.40 6,30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 3.30 130 3,30 3.30 3.30 3,30 3.30 3,30 3.30 3.30
5105 PURIFICATION 51.00 51.00 52.00 54,00 43.50 45.00 45.00 45.00 46.00 42.00 41.00 43.00 43.20 4320 43.20 42.20 42.20 43.00 42.70 45.20 47.20 4720 47.20 47.00 47.00 47.50
5107 TRANSMISSION&DISTRIBUTION 141.00 141.00 137.00 135.00 120.95 122.45 125.45 126.95 124.95 120.17 120.17 116.87 118.37 115.37 114.34 113.34 109.15 111.35 114.35 118.35 114.85 115.35 111.35 109.70 111.70 111.20
5109 SHOPS&MAINTENANCE 48.50 48.50 38.00 38.50 37.85 36.35 36.35 33.35 34.35 33.85 32,85 33,35 31.35 32.35 34.15 30.35 29,85 28.85 28.85 29.35 27.35 27.35 28.35 32.40 31.40 30.90
5111 CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING&COLLECTIO 49.50 49.50 55.00 49.50 49.25 44.75 46.75 49.75 49.75 56.00 56.00 52.50 51.50 51.50 50,00 50.00 49.00 50.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 53.00 52.80 51.55 51.55 50.55
5113 WATER ADMINISTRATION 13.00 13.00 10.00 10.00 7.20 8.20 7.20 6.50 7.50 8.50 8.00 8.50 8.50 8.50 9.50 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.50 12.50 13.50 14.00 12.00 12.00 11.90 12.40
5113 PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
WATER UTILITY TOTAL 325.00 325.00 315.00 318.00 277.18 274.18 278.18 278.98 278.98 278.45 277.45 274.75 270.45 269.45 269.72 263.42 257.73 261.75 268.95 275.95 273.45 273.45 268.05 269.20 270.10 269.60
SEWER UTILITY
5220 LIFT STATIONS 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 8.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
5230 COLLECTION SYSTEM 32.00 45.00 32.53 38.50 33.50 32.50 31.50 29.50 32.28 31.28 28.98 28.98 28.98 28.48 32.48 35.80 27.87 28.87 29.42 27.67 27.92 31.92 27.45 27.45 27.20
5260 RECLAMATION PLANT 55.00 55.00 8825 66.67 68.27 67.27 66.27 84.00 63.00 63.00 62.00 61.80 61.60 63.40 62.40 62.40 64.80 84.10 64.10 84.60 64.90 84.90 84.90 64.90 63,90
5280 ACCOUNTING&CUSTOMER SERVICE 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.85 325 4.25 5.25 6.25 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.50 4.50 3.60 3.80 2.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.80 120 120 1.20 1.20
5290 SEWER ADMINISTRATION 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 5.50 3.90 420 3.70 3.30 2.90 2.65 3.00 3.25 325 3.25 2.85 2.60
5295 PUBLIC UTILITIES ADMINISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
SEWER UTILITY TOTAL 96.00 110.00 109.38 114.02 114.02 113.02 113.02 110.75 110.78 110.78 108.98 108.58 108.58 107.18 108.48 110.50 103.37 103.27 103.77 102.87 103.87 107,07 102.60 102.20 100.70
STORM WATER
5301 STORMWATER MAINTENANCE 13.37 13.37 11.00 12.00 12.50 12.00 12.00 13.25 1325 13.25 13.25 12.25 12.25 1225
5301 STORMWATER ENGINEERING 3.00 1.00 2.40 2.10 4.90 11.28 1128 12.28 11.53 10,08 10.08 10.70 10.70 10.45
5301 STORMWATER ADMINISTRATIVE 3.10 3.10 2.40 2.30 220 2.45 2.90 3.15 3.15 3.15 2.65 2.40
5301 STORMWATER QUALITY 1.30 1.30 2.30 2.30 2.80 2.50 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20 2.20
STORMWATER TOTAL 16.37 14.37 18.50 18.50 21.10 27.88 27.78 30.78 30.18 28.68 28.68 28.30 27.80 27.30
PUBLIC UTILITIES TOTAL 326.00 421.00 426.00 428.38 39120 388.20 391.20 382.00 389.73 389.23 388.23 383.73 395.40 392.40 393.40 390.40 389.33 393.00 400.00 410.60 408.60 406.80 401.80 400.10 400.10 397.60
LERDY W. HOOTON, JR. S T C3 TY CO PO R �I.,=
ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES MAYOR
WATER SUPPLY AND WATERWORKS
WATER RECLAMATION AND STORMWATER
COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
TO: Rocky J. Fluhart DATE: March 11, 2003
Chief Administrative Officer
FROM: LeRoy W. Hooton Jr.
SUBJECT: City Council requested info • on water rate restructure
STAFF CONTACT: Jim Lewis, Finance Administrator(483-6773)
DOCUMENT TYPE: None
RECOMMENDATION: None
BUDGET IMPACT: None
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
Response to the City Council request for additional information related to the proposed
water rate restructure:
1. In response to the City Councils question regarding the effect of increasing the
first rate block for residential customers to include a greater percentage of
customers, the chart below shows the winter use average for our residential
customers. (1 ccf equals 100 cubic feet of water or 748 gallons)
Single Family water usage during winter Percentage of customers
months
9ccf 58.2 %
10 ccf 62.2 %
11 ccf 65.6 %
13ccf 70.5 %
16ccf 75.0 %
The following chart shows a proposed option to increase Block 1 from 900 cf to
1,300 cf,which would require the rates in block 2 to go up by$0.01 from$1.10 to $1.11.
This would allow 70.5% of our residential customers to fall below the block 1 allowance
for inside water usage.
Proposed Option Rates City Council Rates
Option
Block 1: Up to 900 $0.72 Block 1: Up to $0.72
cubic feet 1,300 cubic feet
Block 2: From 901 $1.10 Block 2: From $1.11
cubic feet to 2,900 1,301 cubic feet to
cubic feet 2,900 cubic feet
Block 3: Excess of $1.53 Block 3: Excess of $1.53
2,900 cubic feet 2,900 cubic feet
1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 15
TELEPHONE: 801-4E13-6900 FAX: B01-463-6816
is
�« wecrceo PnPeR
2. The City Council raised a concern on the rate differential proposed for county
customers.
a. The rate differential proposed was calculated in the same fashion as if the
City was under the jurisdiction of the State Public Service Commission.
b. The proposed rate is similar to rates charged by similar sized utilities
across the county. In the 2002 Raftelis Water and Wastewater Rate
Survey, the average retail differential for similar sized utilities was listed
at 1.36 times city rates.
c. Maintaining the rate differential at the 1.5 times city rates could incur
additional legal and administrative costs.
d. Salt lake city customers currently pay a Metropolitan property tax,which
is not paid by the county customers. The tax on a$150,000 home is
approximately$27.60 per year.
e. The rate differential is based on the rate of return on equity basis, which is
calculated based on our cost of debt of 4.94% and a return on current
equity of 10.17% averaged to a total rate of 9.34%.
Amount Weight Return Weighted
Rate of
Return
$ 32,995,000 15.9% 4.94% .78%
$174,747,668 84.1% 10.17% 8.55%
$207,742,668 100.00% 9.34%
f. The City Council has the option of maintaining the rate differential at the
1.5 times city rates. The following chart details the change in the
proposed City and County rates structure. The shift in revenue between
City and County accounts equals about$1.1 million.
City Rates
Current 1.35 Maintain 1.50 Current Maintain 1.50
Differential Differential Option Differential
Rate Option ' Rate Option Average Rate Option
Annual Bill Average
Annual Bill
Block 1: Up to $0.72 $0.70
900 cubic feet
Block 2: From $1.10 $1.02
901 cubic feet to $254.43 $244.67
2,900 cubic feet _
Block 3: Excess $1.53 $1.45 13.65% 9.29%
of 2,900 cubic increase increase
feet
i
,
County Rates
Current 1.35 Maintain 1.50 Current Maintain 1.50
Differential Differential Option Differential
Rate Option Rate Option Average Rate Option
Annual Bill Average
Annual Bill
Block 1: Up to $0.97 $1.05
900 cubic feet
Block 2: From $1.49 $1.53 $434.13 $452.16
901 cubic feet to
2,900 cubic feet
Block 3: Excess $2.07 $2.18 11.23% 15.85%
of 2,900 cubic increase increase
feet
i a L l aTY WRPOA e� _IOI��
LEROY W. HOOTON, JR. - � �. �� ��' ` ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDERSON
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES MAYOR
WATER SUPPLY AND WATERWORKS
WATER RECLAMATION AND STORMWATER
COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
TO: Rocky J. Fluhart DATE: March 4, 2003
Chief Administrative Officer
FROM: LeRoy W. Hooton Jr. £ —
SUBJECT: Request for a briefing on p ,•• Public Utilities budget for 2003-2004,
water conservation rates and water cash flow projections for 2003 -20012
STAFF CONTACT: Jim Lewis, Finance Administrator(483-6773)
DOCUMENT TYPE: None
RECOMMENDATION:
We are requesting permission to brief the City Council on the Public Utilities budget for
2003-2004 and water cash flow projections for 2003-2012.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The Water Utility budget proposes to implement a water rate restructure, which includes
the prior, approved 3%rate increase from June 2001. Customers will be charged based
on the revised rate schedules and their individual water use. The rate schedules are
designed to charge more for water as more water is consumed. The intent of the new rate
schedules is to encourage water conservation and particularly encourage efficient use of
water for outside irrigation.
The Sewer Utility budget includes the prior approved 9%rate increase passed by the City
Council in January 2001. The budget recommends the issuance of$25 million in bonds to
upgrade the existing wastewater treatment plant.
The Stormwater Utility budget does not anticipate a rate increase until after 2009. The
Utility is proposing issuing$8 million in revenue bonds to help finance a new stormwater
line on 900 South. This project will be constructed in connection with the street
improvement project.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:
The Public Utilities Advisory Committee voted on February 27, 2003, to recommend to
the Mayor adoption of the proposed budget for 2003-2004. The budget document is
attached, listing a summary of major budget changes and capital improvement projects
being proposed for the next six-year period for the Sewer and Stormwater Utilities and a
nine-year program for the Water Utility.
1 530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH B41 1 5
TELEPHONE: 801-463-6900 FAX: 801-463-681 8
is
t' RECYCLED PAPER
t
The major budget changes recommend are:
1. Water rate restructure to promote water conservation
2. Bond Issues of$25 million for the Sewer Utility Fund and$8 million for the
Stormwater Utility Fund.
3. Purchase of additional water from Metropolitan Water District from the spot
market to meet forecasted summer demand in the amount of$2,225,000.
4. Continuation of the capital improvement program that was approved by the City
Council in June 2001 for the Water Utility and June 2000 for the Sewer Utility.
5. Elimination of 2 full time positions and .50 of a part time position.
6. Proposed capital improvement budget for all three funds for fiscal year 2003-2004
is over$ 67 million.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salt Lake City Public Utilities
SIX YEAR BUDGET
2004 — 2009
Salt Lake City Corporation
•
•
•
•
• SALT LAKE CITY PUBLIC UTILITIES
•
• BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 - 2004
•
•
• DATE: February 18, 2003
• SUBJECT RECOMMENDED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003 -2004
•
•
• PUBLIC UTILITIES MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES
• 1. Water rate restructure to promote water conservation
•
• 2. Bond Issues of$25 million for the Sewer Utility Fund and $8 million for
the Stormwater Utility Fund.
3. Purchase of additional water from Metropolitan Water District from the
• spot market to meet forecasted summer demand in the amount of
. $2,225,000.
• 4. Continuation of the capital improvement program that was approved by
• the City Council in June 2001 for the Water Utility and June 2000 for
• the Sewer Utility.
• 5. Elimination of 2 full time positions and .50 of a part time position.
• 6. Proposed capital improvement budget for all three funds for fiscal year
• 2003-2004 is over $ 67 million.
• 7. Future rate increases of 64% over the next nine years to finance $200
• million in capital improvement projects.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND
•
SUMMARY OF MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES .
The recommended budget for the Water Fund for fiscal year 2003 - 2004 •
decreases expenditures by $2,645,456 or 4.2 %.
• Implementation of a new water rate structure to promote water •
conservation. This proposed rate change is proposed to encourage water •
conservation now and into the future. This will help the City to reach the •
long-term goal of water reduction and provide adequate water for the utility •
customers past the year 2025. The Administration is proposing the .
following:
1. Restructure water rates for residential customers - Implement a three- •
tiered inclining price structure for April through October in which the •
per-unit cost would increase with the amount of water used, with a flat
•
rate for winter-month consumption. •
2. Restructure rates for industrial and commercial accounts - Implement a •
three-tiered inclining price structure, where Block 1 represents average
winter consumption, Block 2 represents appropriate irrigation season •
consumption up to 300% of the customer's average winter consumption, •
Block 3 represents, with an even higher rate, water use in excess of
•
300% of average winter consumption. •
3. Restructure rates for irrigation accounts - Set a target water budget
based on the size of the irrigated property and other factors. Irrigation •
rates would begin in Commercial Block 2, with the higher water rate of
Block 3 for exceeding the target budget.
•
4. Eliminate water allotment included in the minimum charge - Eliminate
•
the base allowance of 500 cubic feet of water that is currently included in •
the monthly minimum charge.
5. Eliminate demand charge - Eliminate the monthly demand charge for �
customers with large water meters. •
6. Adjust the deferential multiplier for water sales outside corporate limits - •
Adjust multiplier outside of City limits from 1.5 times the in-City rates to
1.35 times the in-City rates, due to changes in the rate of return formula. •
r
110
S
.•
• Implementation of Council Approved Capital Improvement Program - The
110
total capital improvement and capital outlay budget of$21,757,831 is the
second year of the Department's five-year capital improvement program
110 approved by the City Council in 2001.
• Implementation of the Approved Rate Increase to Finance the Metropolitan
Water Districts and Departments Capital Improvement Programs - The
proposed budget for 2003 - 2004 includes the second of four water rate
. increases approved by the Council in June of 2001, to finance the
Metropolitan Water District's and Department's capital improvement
program. The Metropolitan Water District's plan will require our utility to
pay higher water rates for wholesale water and pay a set annual assessment
. each year for the next thirty years to finance their program. Both capital
improvement programs were approved by the City Council in 2001. The
additional water rate increases will be 3% in 2003-2004, 3% in 2004-2005,
and 3% in 2005 - 2006.
• Upgrade of City Creek Water Treatment Plant- This budget includes funding
for the upgrade of the City Creek Water Treatment Plant in the amount of
$11.3 million. The current treatment plant was constructed in the 1940's
and needs to be upgraded to meet current treatment methods. The
Department will not be able to fund all seismic components of the plant
upgrade until after the initial five-year program window. This project was
delayed last year as a precaution to cover any possible revenue shortfall,
which might occur this next summer due to limited water availability.
• Future rate increases totaling 64% over the next nine years will be needed
to finance $200 million in capital improvements- Rate increases averaging
7.1% per year for the next nine years will be required to finance the water
capital improvement needs. The City Council approved rate increases for the
i next three years to finance the Metropolitan Water District's capital
improvement program. Additional increases will be needed to provide
additional cash reserves due to the change in rate structure and to finance
the capital improvement program.
S
S
•
•
•
•
Budget Year City Council New
•
Approved Proposed •
Increases Rate
Increases 0
2003-2004 3% 3% •
2004-2005 3% 9% •
2005-2006 3% 9% •
2006-2007 0% 8% •
2007-2008 0% 9% •
2008-2009 0% 6% •
2009-2010 0% 6% •
2010-2011 0% 7% •
2011-2012 0% 7% •
Total 9% 64% II
I
Analysis of Estimated Revenue •
An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the Department's •
recommended Budget for the Water Fund is as follows. •
•
Revenue Adopted Proposed Difference Percent •
2002-2003 2003-2004
Charges for services $40,257,000 $41,413,498 $1,156,498 3.0% •
Interest 1,250,000 800,000 (450,000) (36.0%) •
Interfund charges 2,049,020 2,126,425 77,405 3.8% .
Sale of used equipment 50,000 50,000 - 0.0% •
Contributions by Developers 1,105,000 1,355,000 250,000 22.6%
Reserve Funds 18,219,708 14,540,349 (3,679,359) (20.2%) •
TOTAL $62,930,728 $60,285,272 ($2,645,456) (4.2%) .
•
Revenue from Charges for Services: The proposed budget includes the 3% rate
increase that was approved by the Council in June 2001 as part of a five-year
capital improvement program. 0
Interest Income: Due to the decrease in interest rates and lower cash reserves 0
interest income continues to decrease by $450,000. •
Interfund Charges and Other Reimbursements: The Water Fund processes •
bills and handles customer service complaints for the Sewer, Stormwater and •
the Refuse Fund. Revenue will increase as the Water Utility increases charges 0
to the other agencies to cover higher costs from data processing and postage. It •
is anticipated that revenue will increase by $77,405 this next year. .
Contributions by Developers: With the implementation of General Accounting •
Standard Board Announcement 34 all contributions by developers are now
•
•
•
•
• classified as non-operating revenue. This requires the budgeting of an
. additional $250,000 in anticipation of water lines being installed and donated
to the City by developers.
Reserve Funds: A transfer is needed from reserves to finance the capital
• improvement program.
• Analysis of Proposed Expenditures
• The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to increase by
• $2,645,456 or 4.2% over the 2002 - 2003 budget. The proposed budget for
• fiscal year 2003 - 2004 by major category is as follows:
•
• Major
• Expenditure Adopted Proposed Difference Percent
• Category 2002-2003 2003-2004
Personal services $13,075,538 $13,616,812 $541,274 4.1%
0 Materials and supplies 2,272,473 2,394,399 121,926 5.4%
• Charges for services 14,086,970 16,076,026 1,989,056 14.1%
• Debt service 4,800,000 4,742,704 (57,296) (1.2%)
Capital outlay 2,358,314 1,447,500 (910,814) (38.6%)
0 Capital improvement program 26,337,433 22,007,831 (4,329,602) (16.4%)
• TOTAL $62,930,728 $60,285,272 (2,645,456) (4.2%)
•
• Personal Services: The proposed budget includes $581,274, for employee
. compensation adjustments. The average employee will receive a 3% increase.
The budget proposes to eliminate 0.50 full time employee and 0.50 part time
• employee with a savings of$40,000.
• Materials 86 Supplies: The proposed budget for materials and supplies is
increasing because of the following:
0 • Additional $27,681 for chemical costs.
• • Additional copy center charges of $1,250 due to additional project books.
•• • Additional water repair materials and asphalt costs to maintain system
$90,000.
• • Additional permit costs in Holiday City and South Salt Lake $7,654.
. • Other reductions of ($4,659).
Charges for Services: The Department proposes the following budget changes
• to the charges for service area as follows:
• • Increase of$ 2,225,000 for water purchases from the Metropolitan Water
0 District due to the need to buy spot market water to meet the forecasted
. summer demand.
0
• Increase of$23,150 in Administrative Service Fees.
•
•
•
• Decrease of ($83,000) in the payment in lieu of taxes to the General Fund.
•
• Increase of$5,489 for increases in fuel costs. •
• Increase of$1,928 for City Data Processing to cover web page and other •
support. •
• Increase $77,719 to cover increase in Power and Fuel costs.
• Decrease ($261,230) in interdepartmental charges between funds. •
11,
Capital Outlay: The proposed budget for fiscal year 2003 - 2004 includes •
•
capital outlay for the replacement of vehicles and heavy equipment.
•
Capital Improvement Program: The Department's proposed budget for fiscal
year 2003 - 2004 includes capital projects as follows: •
•
•
Proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 .
Type of Project Budget Amount
Replacement of water lines and hydrants $ 5,106,831 •
Reservoirs 0 •
Treatment plants 13,345,000 •
Wells 0 •
Maintenance buildings 55,000
Water meter replacement 1,300,000 •
Culverts, flumes&bridges 0
•
Water stock purchases 30,000 •
Land purchases 250,000
Landscaping—Conservation Projects 60,000 •
Service Line Replacement 1,800,000 •
Pumping Plant Upgrades 61,000 •
Total 2002-2003 Capital Improvement Program $ 22,007,831
•
•
•
•
10
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SEWER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND
• SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLICY ISSUES
•
• The Department's Recommended Budget for the Sewer Utility Fund for fiscal
• year 2003 - 2004 decreases all types of expenditures by $261,414 or (.06%).
• The major policy issues reflected in the Mayor's Recommended Budget for the
• Sewer Fund for fiscal year 2003 -2004 is:
• • Sale of bonds to finance capital improvement plan -The Sewer Utility
• delayed bonding in 2002-2003 as timing on the engineering plans for the
• new construction required longer fine tuning than expected. The bond issue
will pay for the construction of major improvements needed at the existing
plant to handle the increase of organic loading. This proposed budget
• includes the projects to be financed and illustrates the timing of
• construction for a $70 million in capital improvements over the next six
• years.
• Sewer rate restructure - To fairly and equitably charge those customers
• discharging the higher plant loadings for chemical treatment, the Sewer
Ill Utility has had to restructure the existing rates. The rate structure has
• already slowed the trend of increasing loading values at the Water
• Reclamation Plant.
• • Sewer rate increase of 9% continues -Year four of a six year plan, sewer
rates will increase 9% as part of the financing plan to repay the above
mentioned bond issue The rate increase passed in January 2001 was
II necessary to finance an aggressive capital improvement plan consisting of
• major sewer treatment plant equipment in need of replacement and to
• update and comply with increasingly stringent treatment requirements.
• POLICY CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS YEAR
• The recommended budget for fiscal year 2003 -2004 reflects the following
• policy direction:
• • Revenue impacted by conservation and economy - Revenue projections
• reflect the impact of drought conditions and lower rates of return on
• invested funds. Sewer charges are based on winter water usage, which is
. lower than expected as both residential and businesses strive for
conservation of water. Rates are increased 9% but expected revenue is
• anticipated to be much lower. Earnings on investment show a 43%
• decrease as the utility uses up cash reserves and the impact of lower rates
• expected during a sluggish economy.
•
•
•
•
•
• Capital improvement program - The proposed five-year capital improvement •
plan includes $33,393,000 for projects during the 2003-2004 fiscal year. •
Under this scenario bonds are sold in fiscal year 2003-2004 to help finance •
over $70 million in treatment plant equipment and needed sewer collection
lines. The program proposes two major sewer trunk lines. •
III
Analysis of Revenue •
•
An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the Mayor's Recommended
Budget is as follows. •
•
Revenue Adopted Proposed Difference Percent •
2002-2003 2003-2004 •
Sewer Services Fees $14,824,000 $15,613,160 $789,160 5.3% .
Interest 800,000 450,000 (350,000) (43.8%)
Permits 85,000 85,000 - 0.0% •
Other 667,000 667,000 - 0.0% •
Impact Fees 600,000 600,000 - 0.0% •
Interfund Charges 140,000 140,000 - 0.0%
Bond issue 25,000,000 25,000,000 - 0.0% •
Reserve Funds 5,078,114 4,577,540 439,160 (8.6%) •
TOTAL $47,194,114 $47,132,700 ($ 61,414) (0.1%) •
Explanation of revenue •
Sewer service fees: With a slower economy and less water usage, the 9% 0
rate increase is expected to generate only about 60% of the expected •
revenue. The rate restructure and increases in 2001 likely prompted 0
businesses to use or waste less water. All other fees or charges are •
expected to remain constant.
•
Interest Income: Interest income also drops 44% over expected past •
earnings as interest rates are at 40 year lows.
•
Permit fees: No change. •
Other income: No change. •
•
Impact Fees: No change.
•
Interfund Charges: No change
•
Bond Issue: The $25,000,000 bond issue is expected to be sold about
•
midyear in the 2004 fiscal year. The issue originally slated for 2002-2003 •
was delayed saving the utility additional interest costs. The only •
uncertainty is whether or not the full $25 million will be sold on the
market. If less bonding provides the same results the utility will sell only •
the amount required. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Reserve Funds: Reserve funds of $4,577,540 will be required to provide
• the additional financing gap often needed to assist with our capital
• funding. The utility has sufficient earnings from previous years to
• balance the budget.
•
• Analysis of Expenditures
The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to decrease ($61,414)
• or (0.1%) over the 2002 - 2003 budget. The proposed budget for fiscal year
• 2003 - 2004 by major category is as follows:
•
• Major
• Expenditure Adopted Proposed Difference Percent
Category 2002-2003 2003-2004
• Personal services $5,502,235 $5,675,520 $173,285 3.1%
• Materials and supplies 1,343,620 1,320,352 (23,268) (1.7%)
• Charges for services 2,384,902 2,603,828 218,926 9.2%
Debt services 1,525,000 2,780,000 1,255,000 82.3%
• Capital improvements 35,129,557 33,793,500 (1,336,057) (3.8%)
• Capital outlay 1,308,800 959,500 (349,300) (26.7%)
• TOTAL $47,194,114 $47,132,700 (61,414) (0.1%)
• Personal Services: The proposed budget includes a projected cut of 1.3 FTEs
• totaling about $61,000. The increase over last year of 3.1% is attributed to an
• approximate 3% proposed cost of living increase and increases in insurance
and other employee benefits.
• Materials & Supplies: The proposed budget for materials and supplies
• decreases $23,000 on repair materials as new plant equipment and upgrades
• reduce the usual costs of supplies.
• Charges for Services: The Department proposes the following budget changes
• to the charges and service area as follows:
• • Increase of$30,000 for power and fuel costs associated with increases in
power charges.
•
• Decrease of ($150,000) for sludge management and waste disposal costs
• associated with extension of the Kennecott Copper agreement.
•
• Increase of$155,000 for payment in lieu of taxes
• • Increase of$100,000, for interfund charges that are increasing due to
• cement work being performed by the Water Utility.
• • Increase of$35,000 for additional laboratory testing.
•
•
•
• Increase of$35,000 for additional laboratory testing. •
• Increase of$26,000 for data processing services. •
•
• Increase of$8,000 for administrative service fees.
•
• Increase of$7,000 in other various miscellaneous services. •
• Increase of$5,000 for fleet management costs. •
• Increase of$2,000 for maintenance service contracts •
•
Debt Service: The issuance of the expected $25 million bond issue will •
increase the debt service by $1.2 million. Interest rates should be very .
favorable for such an issue. #
Capital Outlay: The proposed capital outlay budget dropped $350,000 as cost
of expensive sewer trucks, no office equipment and other equipment •
requirements are less than the previous year. •
Capital Improvements: The Department's proposed capital budget for fiscal •
year 2003 — 2004 is heavily proportioned toward various treatment plant 41
upgrades, new trunk lines into the plant but still maintaining a steady •
replacement of worn sewer lines. The increase from last year is misleading •
since most of the projects tied to the bond issue are not expected to be ready .
until this year. The airport lift station will be completely upgraded for
$400,000. The general category of capital projects for fiscal year 2003 — 2004 •
are as follows: •
•
Type of Project Budget Amount
Maintenance and repair shops $ 37,000 •
Lift Stations $ 450,000 •
Treatment Plant $ 29,180,000
Collection Lines $ 4,101,500 •
Site Improvements $ 25,000 41
Total 2003 - 2004 Capital Improvement Program $ 33,793,500 •
110
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• STORMWATER UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND
•
• SUMMARY OF MAJOR BUDGET ISSUES
• The recommended budget for the Stormwater Fund for fiscal year 2003 — 2004
• increases expenditures by $4,943,444 or 47.0% and requires the issue of an $8
. million revenue bond in the summer of 2003.
• Analysis of Estimated Revenue
• An analysis of the estimated revenue contained in the Department's
. Recommended Budget for the Stormwater Fund is as follows.
•
10 Adopted Proposed Difference Percent
Revenue 2002-2003 2003-2004
. Operating Sales $5,295,199 $5,348,151 $ 52,952 1.0%
County Flood Reimbursement 200,000 200,000 - 0.0%
• Interest 300,000 270,000 (30,000) (10.0%)
• Impact fees 250,000 250,000 - 0.0%
. Contributions by Developers 516,000 516,000 - 0.0%
Other 40,000 40,000 - 0.0%
Revenue Bonds 9,000,000 8,000,000 (1,000,000) (11.1%)
. From(To)Reserves (5,079,026) 841,466 5,920,492 116.6%
. TOTAL $10,522,173 $15,465,617 $4,943,444 47.0%
• Operating Sales: Total sales should increase $52,952 because of new public
development and internal review of large accounts.
County Flood Reimbursement: No change is expected.
110 Reserve Funds: A transfer is needed from reserve funds to finance the capital
improvement program.
110 Interest Income: A decrease of$30,000 due to drop in interest rates.
•
Impact Fees: No change is expected.
S
S
•
•
•
•
Contributions by Developers: No change is expected.
•
Other Fees: No change is expected. •
Revenue Bond: To finance the new 900 south storms drainage system to be •
built over the next three years the Department will need to issue $8 million in •
revenue bonds in the summer of 2003. •
Analysis by Proposed Expenditures •
The expenditure budget for the Department is proposed to increase $4,943,444 •
or 47.0% over the 2002-2003 budgets. The proposed budget for fiscal year •
2003 - 2004 by major category is as follows:
•
•
Major •
Expenditure Adopted Proposed Difference Percent
Category 2002-2003 2003-2004 •
Personal services $1,449,140 $1,480,151 $ 31,011 2.1% •
Materials and supplies 119,150 119,650 600 0.5% •
Charges for services 1,289,572 1,350,816 61,244 4.7% •
Debt Service 375,000 800,000 425,000 113.3%
Capital improvements 6,549,311 11,575,000 5,025,689 76.7% •
Capital equipment 740,000 140,000 (600,000) (81.1%) •
TOTAL $10,522,173 15,465,617 $4,943,544 47.0% •
•
Personal Services: The proposed budget includes a $40,972 for employee
compensation adjustments. The average employee will receive a 3% increase. •
The budget proposes to eliminate .20 FTE utility locator position with a savings •
of ($1,000). There is also an increase in retirement benefits of$7,873 and
•
employee insurance of$7,140. There was a salary contingency of$25,974 in •
FY 2002-2003 budget that was not totally used.
•
Materials 86 Supplies: The proposed budget for materials and supplies is
increasing by $600. •
•
Charges 8s Services: The Department proposes the following budget changes to
the charges for service area as follows: •
•
• Increase $37,240 for increase in the payment in lieu of taxes to the General
Fund. •
• Increase $7,280 for City Data Processing to cover web page and other •
support. •
• Increase $18,800 to cover increase in Administrative Service fees. •
•
• Decrease ($2,076) in other expenses.
Debt Service: Based on complete FY 2003-2004 while only a partial year in FY
2002 - 2003. •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Capital Equipment: The proposed capital equipment budget has decreased due
to cost to replace vactor trucks in FY 2002-2003 and not FY 2003-2004.
•
• Capital Improvements: The proposed budget for capital expenditures includes
Collection Lines for 900 South Jordan River to State Street- Phase 1 for
•
$9,000,000 and 1700 South - 500 West to 900 West for $765,000.
• The Department's proposed budget for fiscal year 2003 - 2004 include capital
• projects as follows:
• Type of Project Budget Amount
• Lift Stations $ 220,000
• Collection Lines $ 11,355,000
• Total 2003 - 2004 Capital Improvement Program $ 11,575,000
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
110
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Water Fund
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
IIP
• WATER UTILITY
• ENTERPRISE FUND
. BUDGET SUMMARY
FY 2003-04
•
• AMENDED PROJECTED PROPOSED FORECAST FORECAST
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
• SOURCES 2001-2002 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
• REVENUES
• METERED SALES $41,144,264 $40,257,000 $38,257,000 $41,413,498 $45,140,713 $49,203,377
• INTEREST INCOME 830,302 1,250,000 850,000 800,000 500,000 500,000
OTHER REVENUES 1,498,939 2,049,020 2,049,020 2,126,425 2,126,425 2,166,878
•
. TOTAL REVENUES $43,473,505 $43,556,020 $41,156,020 $44,339,923 $47,767,138 $51,870,255
• OTHER SOURCES
• GRANTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUES $1,681,594 $855,000 $855,000 $855,000 $855,000 $855,000
IMPACT FEES 918,732 250,000 250,000 500,000 1,439,752 1,839,430
110 OTHER SOURCES 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
* BOND PROCEEDS 0 0 0 0 0 0
* TOTAL OTHER SOURCES $2,600,326 $1,155,000 $1,155,000 $1,405,000 $2,344,752 $2,744,430
* T O TA L SOURCES $46,073,831 $44,711,020 $42,311,020 $45,744,923 $50,111,890 $54,614,685
* EXPENSES&OTHER USES
* EXPENDITURES
PERSONAL SERVICES $12,672,211 $13,075,538 $12,500,000 $13,616,812 $14,047,105 $14,454,257
OPERATING&MAINTENANCE 2,196,586 2,272,473 2,000,000 2,394,399 2,430,205 2,464,908
• TRAVEL&TRAINING 53,875 69,000 40,000 69,000 69,481 69,992
UTILITIES 1,828,600 1,930,682 1,930,682 2,008,401 2,043,176 2,078,618
. PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 1,990,102 2,461,350 2,000,000 2,366,062 2,495,770 2,624,721
. DATA PROCESSING 414,219 401,250 401,250 403,178 424,938 438,809
FLEET MAINTENANCE 697,489 657,300 657,300 662,789 676,045 689,566
• ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 497,408 626,850 626,850 650,000 650,000 650,000
PAYMENT IN LEIU OF TAXES 398,111 428,000 428,000 345,000 345,000 376,050
METRO.WATER PURCH&TREAT 7,648,517 6,825,000 8,325,000 9,050,000 10,485,946 14,071,892
OTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES 345,490 687,538 487,538 521,596 528,623 417,207
•
. TOTAL EXPENDITURES $28,742,607 $29,434,981 $29,396,620 $32,087,237 $34,196,289 $38,336,020
10 OTHER USES
. CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,222,140 $2,358,314 $1,393,750 $1,447,500 $1,482,200 $1,373,600
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 15,007,824 26,337,433 12,806,225 22,007,831 9,410,461 5,556,000
110 DEBT SERVICES 4,717,326 4,800,000 4,681,775 4,742,704 4,737,748 2,620,352
TOTAL OTHER USES $20,947,290 $33,495,747 $18,881,750 $28,198,035 $15,630,409 $9,549,952
III
TOTAL USES $49,689,897 $62,930,728 $48,278,370 $60,285,272 $49,826,698 $47,885,972
. EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER
SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES ($3,616,066) ($18,219,708) ($5,967,350) ($14,540,349) $285,192 $6,728,713
0
OPERATING CASH BALANCES
BEGINNING JULY 1 $27,115,175 $23,499,109 $23,499,109 $17,531,759 $2,991,410 $3,276,602
• ENDING JUNE 30 $23,499,109 $5,279,401 $17,531,759 $2,991,410 $3,276,602 $10,005,315
II • Cash Reserve Ratio(Acceptable range 10%to 25%) 60% 9% 10% 26%
IOperating cash balance is defined as total cash less restricted amounts for
Ibond covenants and outstanding accounts payable.
Metropolitan water rates per acre ft. 105 125 $150 $150 $150 $150
•
•
•
•
•
•
. ACTUAL.ET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
YEAR R YEAR YEAR YEAR
• 2000-2001009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
• WATER SALES 39,72
OTHER INCOME 1,47797'548 65,081,401 69,637,099 74,511,696
INTEREST INCOME
OPERATING INCOME .66,878 2,166,878 2,166,878 2,166,878
•
2'383;00,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
43'683)64,426 67,748,279 72,303,977 77,178,574
• METROPOLITAN WATER ACCESSMENT
• )21,892 -7,021,892 -7,021,892 -7,021,892
METROPOLITAN WATER PURCHASES -6'347'00,000 -15,000,000 -15,300,000 -15,600,000
• OPERATING EXPENDITURES -19,284,71,673 -26,647,823 -27,447,258 -28,270,676
• NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 18'86170,861 19,078,564 22,534,827 26,286,007
• OTHER RECEIPTS / BOND PROCEEDS 37,600,000
• IMPACT FEES 1,038
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,95290,403 1,658,125 1,610,651 1,616,924
• -1'4CAPITAL OUTLAY
WATERSHED PURCHASES 05,000 905,000 905,000 905,000
3713,280 -1,157,846 -1,142,703 -1,187,857
DEBT SERVICE -27200,000 -500,000 -500,000 -500,000
•
-4,52820,352 -2,620,352 -2,620,352 -2,620,352
DEBT SERVICE (NEW) 26,619 -5,531,411 -7 1
• OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE -3,247 , 36,203 -7,136,203
64 848 30 353,516 8 883 607 8 922 488
•
•
• CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 6'88626,862 22,097,080 -14,638,780 -21,052,201
. BEGINING CASH BALANCE 20'12978,659 22,351,798 44,448,878 29,810,098
CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 6 985
6 862 22,097,080 14'638 780 21 052 201
•
• WATER DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE
2.52 2.34 2.31 2.69
• ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL WATER
• BILL (1997=$180.00) $258.8.96
Cash Reserve Ratio (acceptable range 3 110 $465.29 $497.86 $532.71
17.21%
• Metropolitan water rate 10 6.96� 300.0091.33% 59.90%0 300.00
100.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
. Metropolitan water purchases in acre f 49,20000.00 50,000.00 51,000.00 52,000.00
•
•
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 18,2003
SUBJECT: Interlocal Cooperative Agreement-AmeriCorps Program
AFFECTED COUNCIL DISTRICTS: District 2
STAFF REPORT BY: Michael Sears,Budget&Policy Analyst
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Department of Public Services
AND CONTACT PERSON: Rosanita Cespedes
KEY ELEMENTS:
The Administration is recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution
authorizing the Mayor to approve an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt
Lake City and the Salt Lake County AmeriCorps Program. The agreement is for the
staffing of an AmeriCorps member to work as staff support to the Sorenson Multi-
Cultural Center Computer Center program. The coordinator will provide 25-30 hours
of staffing support to the computer program at the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center.
The City will contribute $4,000 towards the staffing costs of the AmeriCorps member.
This money is currently budgeted for in the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center operations
budget. Using a volunteer from AmeriCorps is less expensive than hiring a part-time
hourly employee. This staffing request from the Administration is similar to past
partnerships with AmeriCorps. The City has used AmeriCorps volunteers for programs
in the Central City Community Center. Salary and benefits will be paid through Salt
Lake County. The City is not adding additional staff with this program. When the term
of this agreement expires, the City will use existing staff to continue the operation of
the computer center program.
Specific program details are included in the transmittal from the Administration.
cc: Cindy Gust-Jenson,Rocky Fluhart,David Nimkin,Steve Fawcett,Gordon Hoskins,Ed
Rutan,Larry Spendlove,Rick Graham and Rosanita Cespedes
File location: Michael\Staff Reports
RESOLUTION NO. OF 2003
AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
AND
SALT LAKE COUNTY
WHEREAS, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code, as amended, allows public entities to enter
into cooperative agreements to provide joint undertakings and services; and
WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to accomplish said purposes;
THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,Utah:
1. It does hereby approve the attached Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, and SALT LAKE COUNTY, to wit:
Salt Lake County's Americorps Program shall provide staff support to the Computer
Center program of the Sorenson Multi-Cultural Center at a cost to the City of$4,000.
2. Ross C. Anderson, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah, or his designee, is hereby
authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt Lake City Corporation, subject to any
minor changes which do not materially affect the rights and obligations of the City thereunder.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this day of 2003.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CHIEF DEPUTY CITY RECORDER Salt Lake Ci Attorneys Office
Date ? 2.-co
By t
Pawl- 6
March 20, 2003
Salt Lake City, Utah
From: Central City Neighborhood Council (CCNC)
To: City Council Members of Salt Lake City
RE: Petition No. 400-01-37 Overland Development rezoning requests
We are concerned (worried) about the proposed change of zoning for this
development. We have had much encroachment and expansion of busi-
nesses into this residential area. RMU zoning allows permitted use for retail
businesses. We do not support possible expansion of retail businesses for a
number of reasons.
1. At this time we do not know what retail business might be
considered.
2. We are seeing some businesses going out of business. Is it a wise
plan to provide additional space for retail—just to perhaps have
that space remain vacant?
3. We do not recommend additional businesses established to com-
pete with existing businesses in the area. Many of those existing
businesses are already having their own struggles to stay solvent.
4. We have vacancy rate in the existing businesses and offices in the
area. Do we want to create more potential for vacancies?
5. We also have vacancy rates in the housing and rental units in the
area. Do we need more apartments or 75 ft. apartment type owner
occupied units in the area? Owner occupied —yes. In 75 ft.
apartment style units — we question that.
6. We are concerned that the permitted use of retail as part of the
development will result in an increase of traffic along 600 East
and other neighborhood streets —an increase not appropriate for a
residential neighborhood.
The RMU allows structures to go to 75 ft (or higher) in height. We are
aware there are currently some buildings of this height or higher. We do not
support or recommend allowing any additional buildings of this height into
our CCNC area. We do not perceive that height as appropriate for a resi-
dential area. We recommend restrictions in the future regarding height of
buildings & development in our area.
The landscaped area for the project is in the middle of the rows of buildings.
With the 75 ft. height of the buildings we perceive that much of the sunlight
would be obstructed from these inner court landscaped areas. We perceive
that adjoining and surrounding buildings could also obstruct much of the
sunlight from other windows in the housing units. We do not consider this
a good feature of the development.
This proposed development is in the East Downtown Planning District (a
part of CCNC). The East Downtown District is protected by a View
Corridor policy. (per the master plan for the district) This is to protect the
scenic vistas such as the City/County Building, The State Capitol, Cathedral
of the Madeleine, the mountains to the east, and other significant buildings
in the area. We maintain that this policy must restrict the height of buildings
in order to protect these very important features and characteristics of our
city. These are important trademarks of our city. We do not feel it is
appropriate or beneficial to ignore this policy and negate the residential
nature and status this area is incorporated to be.
This proposed development is also in an Historical District. We feel this
status should provide some protection concerning height, and type of
businesses that could be a part of the development under the RMU zone.
The RMU permits office use as part of the development if the developers
want this. We already have an overload of office buildings in the East
Downtown District. We are aware there is also a vacancy rate in those
offices. This overload of offices resulted from the permitted use in the R7
zone we had at one time. We do not support or recommend that additional
permitted use of offices be allowed in the area.
The CCNC has a housing committee that is currently working with city staff
people to look at a broad picture of development in the CCNC area. At this
time we are focusing on the housing needs of the area. In looking at a map
of the existing development in the East Downtown District we find that the
existing housing is largely apartments and rental units. These are
surrounded by commercial development— mostly offices. We perceive that
this is not a good mix or balance of development. What we lack is sufficient
owner occupied units that would offer more stability in the area and a better
economic base.
We were provided with a map showing the median income levels of the
census tracts of the city. CCNC area is shown as being below the median
income level. The pattern of development and the nature of the
population in the area explains why this is the case.
The CCNC was organized in 1972 and has had as its logo"Central City
Neighborhood Council—Heart of Central City". The story these maps
reveal indicate that CCNC has heart problems. Thus Salt Lake City has
heart problems We suggest it is imperative that we do some long range
planning to overcome these problems of the area. We must insure the
economic stability and health of the area and Salt Lake City.
The CCNC people are not suggesting or recommending any large or
elaborate housing development. We do suggest that we do study and
evaluate the existing housing situation and create some plans to upgrade the
housing in the area—getting boarded houses back into use,rehab on
residents as needed, infill on vacant lots.Other possibilities could also be
considered. We have some neighborhood type business in the CCNC area.
Future planning could indicate some sites where an additional variety of
neighborhood business could be beneficial to help a neighborhood be more
self sufficient and sustainable,and more pedestrian friendly.Our focus is on
HOUSING PRESERVATION and upgrading the neighborhood that more
families and working people might be encouraged to live in downtown.
This currently proposed development(Overland)and any future develop-
ment we would recommend be fitted into this overall concept of develop-
ment we are recommending for the CCNC area.
Therefore we recommend that you do not approve this zoning change for the
project.
LNG " a�'GCtJ
Ma Archuleta
Chair of CCNC
cc. Mayor"Rocky"Anderson
Doug Dansie,Planning and Zoning
Elizabeth Giraud,Planning and Zoning
Soren Simonsen(chair)Historic Landmarks Commission
DATE: March 20,2003
SUBJECT: Petition No. 400-01-37—Ken Holman, Overland Development
Corp.
Request to rezone properties located between 300/400 South and
500/600 East from Residential Multi-Family RMF-35 and
Residential Office to Residential Mixed Use
AFFECTED COUNCIL
DISTRICTS: If approved,the ordinances will affect Council District 4
POTENTIAL, MOTIONS:
1. ["I move that the Council"] Adopt the proposed ordinances rezoning properties located
between 300/400 South and 500/600 East as recommended by the Planning Commission
with the exception of the 50 foot height allowance.
(Attachment A)
3. ["I move that the Council'] Adopt the proposed ordinances rezoning properties located
between 300/400 South and 500/600 East with the exception of the 50 foot height
allowance and the condition that the Planning Commission amend the planned
development conditional use to:
a. Prohibit commercial development on the property fronting on 300 South.
b. Permit commercial development on the property fronting on 600 East.
(Attachment B)
4. ["I move that the Council'] Not adopt the proposed ordinances.
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: March 15,2003
SUBJECT: Petition No.400-02-32—request to amend the Zoning Ordinance Sign Chapter
and establish a Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District at 1530 South 500
West
AFFECTED COUNCIL
DISTRICTS: If adopted,the ordinance will affect Council District 2
•
STAFF REPORT BY: Janice Jardine,Planning Policy Analyst
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT. Community and Economic Development—Planning Division
AND CONTACT PERSON: Everett Joyce,Principal Planner
KEY ELEMENTS:
A. This is a request to amend the Zoning Ordinance Sign Chapter(Sec. 21A.46.090)and establish an
alternative sign overlay district for the Jerry Seiner automotive dealership located at 1530 South 500 West.
The proposed overlay district would establish special sign standards for the Seiner automotive dealership.
The property is zoned General Commercial. Surrounding land uses include large-scale commercial and
industrial businesses.
B. The purpose of the Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District(21A.46.130)is to allow the creation of
special sign regulations to meet the needs of special large-scale land uses. Large-scale land uses include
uses such as a shopping center,office park,airport,large institutions,universities,medical centers or uses
having a multi-building campus. The regulations also apply to stadiums,arenas,and convention centers in
the Downtown zoning districts. I. rge-scale land uses have common design elements that can be
complemented and enhanced through the use of special signage. Currently,the Localized Alternative Sign
Overlay District is permitted on sites two acres or larger in the following zoning districts:
Research Park RP General Commercial CG
Commercial Shopping CS Airport A
Urban Institutional UI Business Park BP
Institutional I Public Lands PL
Downtown D-1,2,3
C. The proposed overlay district includes the following specific requirements. (Please note,other types of
signs and standards established for the General Commercial zoning district will remain the same.)
1. A maximum of 4 pole signs will be permitted based on the total street frontage of the Seiner
automotive dealership.
2. Additional standards will apply specifically to the following sign types:
a. flat(storefront orientation),
b. wall(general building orientation),and
c. pole signs
Page 1
3. A minimum lot frontage of 100-feet will be required for pole and monument signs.
4. Only one manufacturer's franchise name may be displayed on each individual sign.
D. The Administration's transmittal and Planning staff report provide a detailed discussion of the proposed
overlay district.The Planning staff report provides findings of fact that support the criteria established in the
City's Zoning Ordinance, Sec. 21A.50.050-Standards for General Zoning Amendments. (Please refer to
the Administration's paperwork for additional details.) Key elements include:
1. The property consists of 11-acres used as a multiple automotive dealership,with new and used
vehicles in connection with authorized automotive franchises.
2. In large commercial market areas,automotive manufacturers impose separate signage design
requirements as a condition of granting a franchise.
3. The State Department of Motor Vehicles requires automotive dealerships with multiple franchises
to provide signs that minimize confusion for consumers.
4. The proposed overlay would permit signage similar to that permitted for other automotive
dealerships that are located on multiple parcels. Multiple parcels allow a greater number of signs to
be used.
E. On December 5,2002,the Planning Commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council to amend the Zoning Ordinance and establish the proposed overlay district. Issues discussed
included:
1. Extending the proposed overlay zone to 1300 South.
2. Clarification of the size,height,types and number of signs that would be allowed.
3. The petitioner's representative indicated that the use of the overlay allows defining the business to
relate specifically to the automotive industry. The language is specifically written to avoid having
other businesses piggy back on this ordinance.
F. The public process included review by the West Salt Lake Community Council.The Community Council
voted to support two additional signs that would be visible from the freeway. The petitioner indicated at the
Planning Commission meeting that the Community Council was not interested in reviewing the written
material and asked for a brief explanation prior to taking a vote.
MATTERS AT ISSUE/POTENTIAL QUESTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATION:
Council Members may wish to discuss with the Administration:
A. The rationale for using the Localized Alternative Sign Overlay District versus establishing signage criteria
that relates specifically to automotive dealerships on a citywide basis.
B. Other potential areas in the downtown or citywide that may be considered for use of the Localized Sign
Overlay District.
MASTER PLAN&POLICY CONSIDERATIONS:
A. The Administration notes that the proposed sign overlay district is consistent with the land use policies of
the West Salt Lake Community Master Plan. The proposed overlay district is consistent with the intent of
the Sign Chapter in the Zoning Ordinance. As a multi-franchise automotive dealership with support
facilities, it is the type of large-scale development for which the Alternative Sign Overlay was developed.
Page 2
B. The City's Strategic Plan and the Futures Commission Report contain statements that support creating
attractive conditions for business expansion including retention and attraction of large and small businesses,
but not at the expense of minimizing environmental stewardship or neighborhood vitality.
C. The City's 1990 Urban Design Element notes that signs contribute to the character of different areas of the
city and are often a major identifying feature. The Planning staff report notes that the Urban Design
Element recommends that signage allow ample opportunities for advertising while enhancing the quality of
life in the city. Applicable policy concepts include the following statements:
1. Provide ample opportunities for businesses to advertise products and services without having a
detrimental effect on the community.
2. Consider sign design and location as an integral part of all development,not as an afterthought.
3. Preserve prominent view corridors and city vistas. Prominent landforms,buildings, and monuments
should remain clearly visible as City landmarks.
4. Require private development efforts to be compatible with urban design policies of the city regardless of
whether city financial assistance is provided.
CHRONOLOGY:
> BACKGROUND
The Administration's transmittal provides a chronology of events relating to the rezoning process.
Please refer to the Administration's chronology for details. Key meeting dates are listed below.
D KEY DATES
• April 17,2002 West Salt Lake Community Council meeting
• December 5,2002 Planning Commission meeting
cc: Rocky Fluhart,Dave Nimkin,DJ Baxter,Ed Rutan,Lynn Pace,Alison Weyher,David Dobbins,Roger Evans,
Louis Zunguze,Brent Wilde,Craig Spangenberg,Enzo Calfa,Cheri Coffey,Everett Joyce,Marge Harvey,Gwen
Springmeyer
File Location: Community and Economic Development Department,Planning Division,Zoning text and map
amendment—Alternative Sign Overlay District—Jerry Seiner Automotive Dealership—1530 South 500 West
Page 3
• ACTUAL ACTUAL CURRENT BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGE
YEAR YEAR BUDGET YEAR YEAR YEAR _ YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
• 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-201
• WATER SALES 39,721,723 41,144,264 38,257,000 41,413,498 45,140,713 49,203,377 53,139,647 57,922,215 61,397,548 65,08
OTHER INCOME 1,477,971 1,498,938 2,049,020 2,126,425 2,126,425 2,166,878 2,166,878 2,166,878 2,166,878 2,16
• INTEREST INCOME 2,393,698 830,302 850,000 800,000 500,000 500,000 OPERATING INCOME 500,000 500,000 500,000 50
43,593,392 43,473,504 41,156,020 44,339,923 47,767,138 51,870,255 55,806,525 60,589,093 64,064,426 67,74
• METROPOLITAN WATER ACCESSMENT
• -3,510,946 -7,021,892 -7,021,892 -7,021,892 -7,021,892 -7,02
METROPOLITAN WATER PURCHASES -5,347,419 -7,648,516 -8,325,000 -9,050,000 -6,975,000 -7,050,000 -8,312,500 -14,400,000 -14,700,000 -15,001
• OPERATING EXPENDITURES -19,284,121 -21,094,090 -21,071,620 -23,037,237 -23,710,343 -24,264,128 -24,834,708 -25,423,414 -25,871,673 -26,64'
• NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 18,961,852 14,730,898 11,759,400 12,252,686 13,570,849 13,534,235 15,637,425 13,743,787 16,470,861 19,071
• OTHER RECEIPTS / BOND PROCEEDS
IMPACT FEES 46,000,000 37,60(
• 1,038,540 918,732 250,000 500,000 1,439,752 1,839,430 1,887,218 1,912,987 1,990,403 1,65(
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,952,318 1,681,594 905,000 905,000 905,000 905,000 905,000 905,000 905,000 90!
• CAPITAL OUTLAY
WATERSHED PURCHASES -1,437,941 -1,222,140 -1,393,750 -1,447,500 -1,482,200 -1,373,600 -2,093,000 -1,434,000 -1,113,280 -1,157
-272,071 -2,170,851 0 -250,000 -250,000 -500,000 -500,000 -500,000 -500,000 -50C
• DEBT SERVICE -4,528,598 -4,717,326 -4,681,775 -4,742,704 -4,737,748 -2,620,352 -2,620,352 -2,620,352 -2,620,352 -2,62C
DEBT SERVICE (NEW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE 40,337,016 -5,264,848 30,353
-3,247;752 -5,509,991 -4,920,525 -5,035,204 -4,125,196 -1,749,522 -2,421,134 40,337,016 -5,264,848 30,353
•
• { a 1 , i 3 13 t
't -a b b
•
• CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 6,985,410 -3,616,066 -5,967,350 -14,540,349 285,192 6,728,713 7,696,291 33,677,053 -29,026,862 22,097
• BEGINING CASH BALANCE CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 20,129,765 27,115,175 23,499,109 17,531,759 2,991,410 3,276,602 10,005,315 17,701,606 51,378,659 22,351
6,985,410 -3,616 066 -5,967,350 -14,540,349 285,192 6,728,713 7,696,291 33,677,053 -29,026,862 22,097
• WATER DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 4.19 3.12 2.51 2.58 2.86 5.17
5.97 2.10 2.52
• ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL WATER
• BILL (1997=8180.00) 9258.32 $276.40 $287.46 $296.08 $322.73 $351.78 4
Cash Reeerve Ratio (acceptable range 7 110.08% $379.92 $414.11 _ $438.96 $465
• 81.76% 59.64% 150.009.32% 9.584 26.10% 44.000 109.68$ 46.96% 91
Metropolitan water rate 105.00 125.00 150.00 150.00 _ 150.00 175.00 300.00 300.00 301
91
• Metropolitan water purchases in acre f 49,200.00 45,000.00 45,550.00 51,000.00 46,500.00 47,000.00 47,500.00 48,000.00 49,000.00 50,001
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
w • w • • • • • w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 11
Salt Lake City Corporation
Depart/mot of Punk M Ilines Last Update
Depart/mot
2/28/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR MAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 2002-03 200304 2004.05 200648 2008.07 2007.2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
51-03301- 271010 LAND --
03301 LAND PURCHASES _J 0 250,000 25%000 500 000 500,000 500,000--- 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
0 250,000 250.000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
51-03301-_ 72 10 30 WATER RIGHTS&SUPPLY =�
03301 WATER STOCK PURCHASES 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30_000 30,000
03301 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION FOR WATER RIGHTS -
5,000.000 5,000.000
30000 30,000 =Iallral lam = ®"r' ®r"0
51-01301- 2720 10 MAINTENANCE&REPAIRSHOPS-WIP 51-01301-2772.10_
00201 REPAIR OF BC AND LC FLUMES 8
,000
00801 REPLACE SLUDGE PUMPS IN PUMPHOUSE -" 10 000===
01801 50%SHARE OF LABORATORY AT REC PLANT 10%
01301 REGAN BUILDING RENOVATION --
02201 ASPHALT SHOP YARDIMIIIMIIIII- �- 1.500,000
02201 ASPHALT EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT82,875
�� 145.750
02201 SHOPS LUNCH ROOM CONVERSION 40,000
00601 RESTROOM/SINGLE/LAMBS - 45000--
00601 RESTROOM/DOUBLE/LAMBS 27,000 -- _-
00601 VARIOUS RESTROOM REPLACEMENTS 40 000
51343 'LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 5.000
37A00 55,000 40,000 40.000
51-013011- 22720 30 TREATMENT PLANTS-WIP 51-01301-2772.10
00701 512276 CITY CREEK-TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADE 25% 300,000 11,300,000 '- ---- ------ --- - - -- - -00701 Sed Basins-seismic,collectorsMIE 5,000,000
00701 Above grade seismic 5,000,000 --�- -- - - - ---- ---
00701 UV -
250,000-_00701 512278 CITY CREEK VAULT 3,498
00701 FILTER BUILDING PLC MODIFICATION - - 5000_-
00701 BW water recovery system
50,000
00701 Re Tank rehab ==� - - 25,000 00701 Replace all old large Imes 500,000
00701 Telephonelu system - =� -- 65,000
-00701 Sludge beds-bong 8 valves _ -_-__ 900 0�
00701 Raw water supply enhancement 1,000,000
00801 MT DEL VALVE REPLACEMENT 500
000
00801 TOC ON LINE ANALYZER -- 25,000 ---- --- - -_-- -- -_ --- -- ----
00801 Sludge Beds-line,valves �� --__ _--__ 00 000 900.000
00801 UV 500,000 00801 Precursor/Taste 8 Odor Control _000
00801 KmnO4 feeder replacement ril 80,000 - -_-
00801 HVAC-mule zone unit _
______ 400.000 00801 Dredge or treat reservoir sediments 1,000,000 ------ ----00801 BW water recovery system - - -- _._
00801 Panel room charts - _._ .__ _ 50,000
50,000
00801 Additional security cameras ' 25,000
00801 Valve house rehab(including starts)
_50,000
00801 Lab counters,sink,cabinets,hood - 75 000 00801 Flash mixers>
50,000
_ 00801 Carbon feed system 25_.000_
00801 5-10 MG Onlshed water reservoir 3,000,000
00801 Sludge Una5��,
00801 PARLEY'S DRYING BEDS 160,000 EMI
----- --- -------- ---- ----- ----
00801 GRAB SAMPLING FOR BW COMPLIANCE RULE -- 25000
008011 INLET CONTROL BOX RE-DESIGN AND REPLACEMENT -1.11.Mil 300 000 __ ____ _
00901 CAUSTIC FEEDER REPAIR - 5,000-_
00901 UV1.1111111111111111111M--_ _500,000 ___-
00901 Hypochlonle system -- .111111.1111.11111111011
- - --- 500,000
00901 Sludge beds,valves -__ 900 000
00901 On-line instrumentation
- - ------ 50,000 _--- 90 00901 MILLCREEKG TRWOOD-NT PLANT 100% J ==� 600,000 5,400,000 _00901 BIG COTTONWOOD-SEISMIC UPGRADE(SEDIMENTATION BASIN) 2 500,000 00901 BIG COTTONWOOD DRYING BRDS 100000 00901 REBUILD TWO HIGH PRESSURE PUMPS - 10,000
00901 _REBUILD TWO WASHWATER PUMPS -J 10,000 ..._--__ ----- ---- -------
00901 REBUILD ZONAL WATER ROE TMEH MIXER 14000- -_-
512145 CONVENTIONAL WATER TREATMENT PILOT PLANT
- 512146 FLORIDATION FOR SYSTEM 300,000 2,000,000 M=1111111.1.1111- - __---- - -__ - --A---
-- 838498 13,345,000 14,000 500,000 11,000,000 6,040,000 9,525,000 1,380,000 3,300,000
_51-01301_2720 35 PUMPING PLANTS AND PUMP HOUSES-WIP 51.01301-2772.10 _-
01301 PUMP 8 MOTOR FOR KENTON DR PUMP STATION 12,000
01301 PUMP 8 MOTOR FOR EAST BENCH PUMP STATION _ 12 00tl
I lexceN,udge120011ce.M10oe1 CIPcuhbv2000 oh
Selt Luke City Carpontlun
Depemnent of Public uoliun Last Update
2282003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAK YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH'
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 2002.03 2003.44 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 20074008 2008.2009 2009.2010 2010.2011 2011-2012
01301 V F D.FOR UNIVERSITY PUMP STATION , 10,000
01301 LITTLE WILLOW PUMP STATION-NEW BOOSTER PUMP 100% 130,000 -----" - ----"-'
01301 PUMPS&MOTOR 4500 SO PUMP STATION 100% 14,000 -- --- -----
_01301 SOFT START MOTOR STARTER BONNEVILLE PUMP STATION 50% 17,000 -------"-
01301 PUMP BONNEVILLE PUMP STATION 100% 14,000
01301 VICTORY ROAD 20% 500,000 1,000,000--
01301 UPPER BOUNDARY SPRINGS 500,000 ---------
01301 NORTH BENCH PUMP STATION 50% 1,000,000 ------- ------" -'--
_01301 MOTOR&PUMP 7800 SO PUMP STATION 20% 16,000 - ----- -- --- --"
01301 MOTOR&PUMP 3900 SO PUMP STATION 20% 17,000 ---- -"'------- '-------
01301 V.F.D.FOR 7800 SO PUMP STATION 20% 28,000 - -- --------- -"
01301 REPLACE POWER TRANSFORMER EAST BENCH PUMP STATION 30,000
•
01301 PUMPS&MOTOR BIRCH DR PUMP STATION 20% 16,000 ---'-"---
01301 MOTOR RESEARCH PARK PUMP STATION 100% - - 12,000----- -' --'
UPGRADEBUILDINGSTRUCTURES-ONE PER YEAR 100,000 100,000 100,000 ___--100,000 100,000 100,000--- 100,000
01301 AUTOMATIC GRATE CLEANING SYSTEM FOR PUMP STATION INTAKE 100000
170,000 61,000 145,000 100,000 1,100,0004 158,000 600,000 600,000 1,100,000 100,000
51-01301- 2730 02 CU,.VE5TS FLUMES&RIDGES-WIP 51.01321-2773.10 - -'----
00101 6650 S.GREENFIELD WASTE WAY RECONSTRUCTION 15,000 - - - - --'- ------
00101 4800 S WASTEWAY AUTOMATIC OVERFLOW _ 15,000
_ 00101 8900 S STATE ACCESS WAY 6,000 ---- -'------' -- -----
00101 EAST JORDON EXT.BOX FLUME FROM CAHOON TO WALKER DIVERSIONS 10,000 `- -- -----"---- ------
00101 9400 S BRIDGE 200,000
00101 VARIOUS LOCATIONS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,0001 50,000
00101 10TH EAST 1388 SOUTH TO 1482 SOUTH 25,000
- '-"--''-- --'--- -
25,000 0 36,000 10,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
51-01301- 773004 DEEP PUMP WELLS-WIP 51 01301-2773.10
5132235 MICK RILEY&PIPELINES • i - 4000000--- ---------
5132241 RED BUTTE 100% 400,000k 800.000 -----"--------- ----
-600 EAST 1,000_000
CITY CREEK 1,200_000
(3)NEW WELLS TO COVER 10 CFS WATER RIGHTS 100% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
VARIABLE SPEED DRIVES IN ALL WELLS 100,000 100,000 100 000 100,000 100,000
6200 SOUTH REHAB -- ----- 200,�--i -- - -- ----------
01301 5132240 3900 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE 100% 1,000,000
I SUGAR HOUSE WELL-UPGRADE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM - '--"---'- 1,000000----'-----------
-02501 RECONDITION DYERS INN WELL 25000 - ------ - - ----
_02501 ELECTRICAL PANEL FOR DIAGIONAL WELL 7.000 -- -' - - --02501 V.F D.WALKER LANE WELL --- --
02501 RECONDITION FONTAINE BLEU WELL 35 000 --'- ------------------ -------26,000
01301 51341871512 7000 SOUTH PUMP STATION 10% - --------"--- -- '--'-
51341652 4500 SOUTH PUMP STATION 10% _ - ------"-- "---`-----"-'---
__ UPGRADE BUILDING STRUCTURES-ONE PER YEAR 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
01301 51322312 500 SOUTH WELL
32,000 0 35,000 26,000 0 2,600,000 7,400,000 2,200,000 200,000 1,200,000
51_01301- 273006 STORAGE RESERV9IRS-WIP 51.01 3 01-2 7 73.10 ------ -'--'--"-- ---- - ------
01301 5134452 LAKE MARY'S DAM _---- 48,520 50,000 -- -- - ---
01301 5134456 RED PINE DAM 75,000 - - --- --- - -
_ 01301 5124471 MT DELL DAM --------------------------------- ---
48.526 0 75,000 50,000_ 0 0 0 0 0 0
51-01301- 2730 07 DISTRIBUTION RESERVOIRS-WIP 51-07301-2773.10
01301 75134424 MILITARY RESERVOIR 15,000 3,000,000 ----'- ---- ------
01301 1300 SOUTH REPLACEMENT&DEMO 5,000,000
---- ---
01301 NEW HIGH ZONE 5,000,000
01301 PLEASANT VALLEY DEMO - -700,000
------------------
01301 MISCELLANEOUS REPAIRS 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
01301 51344122 THIRTEENTH EAST RESERVOIR-DEMO 7,083 - -' _- _--- _1_0.0_,0_00 ----__ ---r---------
01301 5134454 4500 SOUTH 2700 EAST RESERVOIR 20% 52,474 5,000,000
_ 02501 REPLACE PLUG VALVE AT 1500 EAST RESERVOIR 35,000 ----'-----�-02501 FORT DOUGLAS-12'BUTTERFLY VALVE&OPERATOR 8,000 -- `--' -------------
_ 01301 DEMO PLEASANT VALLEY RESERVOIR 700,000
01301 PERRY'S HOLLOW 14,000
-------- -- - ----- - -01301 DEMO BRICK TANK 400,000
02501 VICTORY RD RESERVOIR ELEC ACTUATOR _ 74000 - '-- - - ------ --- - ---
01301 51344203 TANNER RESERVOIR ROOF _-_ 70 050- - - - ------- --- --- ---
- 201,557 0 14,000 0 0 50,000 13,750,000 1,250,000 50,000 5,050,000
51-01301_273008 DISTRIBUTION MAIN$&HYDRANTS-WIP 5101301.2773.10 - --"- - -'------ ----
_ CED DRIVEN PROJECTS - --------------- ---
_ 01301 513504757 SOUTH TEMPLE-MAIN STREET TO VIRGINIA STREET(1345 E)(CED JOB NO.102010) 21,600 800,000 --------'---" ------
01301 513504758 900 SOUTH-MAIN STREET TO THE JORDAN RIVER(CED JOB NO.102004) 3,500 245,000 OF 8
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •C•• •.• • •
WW WWW • • W • • • • • • W • • • W • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • it ! • • 411/1 • • •
.111.Ulm City Cerpenllen
Last Update
Department of R anh°Ueliriet
2/28/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
•
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAH YEAR YEAH YEAR YEAH'
CENTER. NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 2002.03 200344 2004.08 2005-06 200647 2007-2008 2008.2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
01301 513504774 GLADIOLA STREET(2900 W)-500 SOUTH TO 1820 SOUTH(CED JOB NO 103007) 1,580 150,000
01301 513504749 1300 SOUTH-1700 EAST TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD(2100 E)(CEO JOB NO.102065) 0 35,000 -- --- ----01301 513504747 EMERSON AVENUE(1475 S)-400 EAST TO 500 EAST(CED JOB NO.102093)I 2,858 I -' -- ----------01301 513504752 1200 EAST-YALE AVENUE(1080 S)TO GILMER AVENUE(905 S)(CED JOB NO 102095) 840 58,800 ----` -- -----------
01301 513504753 HERBERT AVENUE(1045 5)-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST(CED JOB NO 102095) 810 34,828_ ----- -- -' '-----------------
01301 513504751 MICHIGAN AVENUE(950 S)-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST(CED JOB NO.102095) __ 768 53,780 _ ---"-" --'---- - --
01301 EAST WEST LIGHT RAIL - 400,000 -- - ---- --------- ------
WATKINS CONSTRUCTION SHARE OF 20 INCH LINE 5600 WEST 75,000 --- ------------------__---_____
01301 513504756 500 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH(CED JOB NO 102038) 5,940 415,800 _ ------ -----
_1300 SOUTH-GLENDALE DRIVE(1350 W)TO APPROX 1380 WEST _800 150,000 -------�------
01301 51400012 COUNTY WATER MAINS 9,274 ---- ----------------
-- 01301 VARIOUS PROJECTS 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000----100,000 400,000 400,000----400,000 400,000
1,489,116 590,800 250,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 400,000 400,0001 400,000
WATER M AIN MISCELLANEOUS PROJEFTS, ---- - -------__~-01301 513800010 NEW MAINLINE VALVES-COUNTY _ 00,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000
01301 51400007 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENTS 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 ----100,000----100,000 100,000
01301 51400007 DONATED LINES - -- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000--_--100,000
01301 51380009 NEW MAINLINE VALVES-CITY 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 125,000 125,000 _ 125,000 125,000 125,000
01301 51370009 FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENTS 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000_ 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
01301 REGULATOR REPLACEMENT - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100000 --- 100_000
01301 6400 SOUTH REGULATOR REPLACEMENT50,000
- --- _--.--_ -__ -
01301 CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500_000 500.000
-- - --- _ _--- 1,050,000 1,050.000 1,050,000 1.050,000 1,050000 1,290.000 1,240,000 1,240,000 1,240,000! 1,240,000
51-01301- 72 30 O 1 WATER M AIN RF,INACEM TS - - -- -------- -------
01301 513504829 MERCEDES WAY(2886E)-OQUIRRH DRIVE(1185 S)TO CRESTVIEW DRIVE(2770 E) ) 845 54,925_ --- -----------------01301 513504824 JEFFERSON(140 W)-INTERSECTION OF 900 SOUTH AND JEFFERSON STREET 125 8,750 ------ -"------------------
01301 513504823 JEFFERSON(140 W)-APPROX 750 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH 184 12,880
01301 513504822 900 SOUTH-400 WEST TO 500 WEST 675 47,250_ -"- ----"--"-- --- --------------
01301 513504821 800 SOUTH-200 WEST TO 300 WEST 730 51,100 - - - - -- -----
01301 513504820 600 SOUTH-APPROX 650 WEST TO 675 WEST 250 17,500 - -------01301 513504819 400 WEST-900 SOUTH TO ASPEN AVENUE(1045 S) 1,300 91,000 ---- -------
01301 513504818 300 WEST-700 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH 800 56,Oar1 - ----"----------------- ---01301 513504817 300 SOUTH-300 WEST TO 330 WEST 365 25,550 - -- --"-'-'" -- - -------------- - -----
_ 01301 513504818 900 WEST-APPROX.900 NORTH TO 1000 NORTH(EAST SIDE OF THE STREET 6'PIPE) 850 65,000 -- -------`------"---- '- - --- --- ------
01301 513504815 SIMONDI AVENUE(340 N)-INTERSECTION OF 800 WEST 115 5550 - -----"- ---' ---'---- -- ------- - -
01301 513504815 SIMONDI AVENUE(340 N)-800 WEST TO 900 WEST 650 45,500 - --- --"' -----' --- -----
01301 513504614 RIVERSIDE CIRCLE(455 N)-INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE CIRCLE AND 1400 WEST 215 15,050 - ----------'---------- --- ---01301 513504813 300 NORTH-1100 WEST TO MARION STREET(1040 W) I 288 20,180
01301 513504812 REDWOOD ROAD(1700W)-NORTH TEMPLE TO SOUTH TEMPLE(WESTSIDE) 814 58,980 --- --- ----------- --------.-- -- __
01301 513504811 2400 WEST-APPROX 140 NORTH TO 180 NORTH _ 275 19,250 - ----'- ------------ -----
01301 513504810 1000 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO 200 NORTH 645 46,150 --- -"-- --------- - -------
01301 513504809 COMMON WEALTH AVENUE(2130 S)-SCENIC DRIVE(2745 E)TO HIGHLAND HILLS(2884 740 7,187 -"-- ---- -------------
01301 513504809 2100 SOUTH/HYLAND HILLS ROAD(2884 El-SCENIC DRIVE(2745 E)TO LAKE LINE DRIV 1,832 137,400 "------ - -------------------
-_01301 _513504805 KENNEDY DRIVE(965 S)-DONNER WAY(2895 E)TO APPROX 902 SOUTH I _1_100 71,506 --'---" - ---------
01301 513504804 STANSBURY WAY(2854 E)-OQUIRRH DRIVE(1186 S)TO CRESTVIEW DRIVE(1010 S) 960 62,400 -----'-- -- -- -----------
01301 513504803 6400 SOUTH-HIGHLAND TO 1500 EAST 1.900 225,000 - - -"---" --- -- --- --------01301 513500803 6400 SOUTH-HIGHLAND DR TO 1500 EAST -- 45,000
01301 513504802 HIGHLAND DRIVE-3900 SOUTH TO FOREST HILLS(3805 S) (REPLACE6"PIPE W/12"PI 635 150,000 -'-'---- - --------------�
01301 513504798 MONTROSE AVENUE(745 SOUTH) 335 18,748 - - -'-'-"--""--------- ---- -- -----
01301 513504791 1400 WEST GOODWIN AVENUE 1135 TO 1000 NORTH 1,063 109,258 ----- "-------- - ----01301 513504757 SOUTH TEMPLE-STATE STREET TO VIRGINIA STREET(1345 E)(CEO JOB NO 102010) 21.600 420,000 -----------------------
01301 513504721 900 WEST-SIGNORA DRIVE(705 N)TO 1000 NORTH(WEST SIDE OF THE STREET-18"F 2.350 282,000 -- --- - - - -------
-01301 513504721 900 WEST-500 NORTH TO 600 NORTH(WEST SIDE OF THE STREET-18'PIPE) 800 98,000 - - ----- ---------- -01301 513504721 900 WEST-200 NORTH TO 400 NORTH(WEST SIDE OF STREET 18'PIPE) 1,570 188,000 - ---- -- -------
01301 513504720 SOUTH TEMPLE-GLENDALE STREET(1135 W)TO APPROX 1190 WEST 485 38,800 - ----'- -- ------
01301 513504712 DEVONSHIRE CIRCLE(1350 S)-DEVONSHIRE DRIVE(2940 E)TO END OF THE CIRCLE 426 27,890 -'---- - ----01301 513504706 CAROUSEL STREET(1540 W)-GARNETTE STREET(1338 N)TO GARNETTE STREET(120F 1,510 597 - '- --- -------- ----
01301 513504704 AMERICAN BEAUTY DRIVE(1030 W)-MCFARLAND DRIVE(825 N)TO RAMBLER DRIVE(72 784 7,443 - ------- -- -------------
01301 513504703 GARNETTE STREET(1525 W)-DUPONT AVENUE(1335 N)TO CAROUSEL STREET(1540 V 945 581 --- "-- ------------ ---- - --- ---
01301 513504701 OAKLEY STREET(1241 W)-LAFAYETTE DRIVE(700 N)TO 600 NORTH J 783 7,442 ----------" -------- ---- --- --- --
01301 513504700 CATHERINE STREET-DUPONT AVENUE(1335 N)TO GOODWIN AVENUE(1135 N) 1,440 802 '----- - --- ------ --
_ 01301 513504699 WALL STREET(65 W)8 200 WEST-REED AVENUE(735 N)TO 600 NORTH I 1,080 7500 ------------------
_ 01301 513504698 PINNOCCHIO DRIVE(875 N)-POINSETTIA DRIVE(925 W)TO AMERICAN BEAUTY DRIVE(I 861 7,442 ------- --- -------------__
01301 513504690 700 WEST-900 SOUTH TO 1200 SOUTH 2,900 . 28,125 -' -- - ------------01301 513504689 700 WEST-1300 SOUTH TO 1700 SOUTH 2,500 28,125 -------__---- -----------
01301 513504682 CRESTVIEW DRIVE(2770 EAST)EMIGRATION CANYON ROAD(850 SOUTH) 131 10,750 -----"---- ----------- -01301 513504674 700 NORTH-REDWOOD ROAD(1700 W)TO JORDAN RIVER _ 1,032 3201 - ------------__-- -_____--_
01301 513504655 500 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO 400 SOUTH 6,400 110,524 - -- ------------
01301 513504589 LIGHT RAIL VARIOUS LOCATIONS 13,745 89,112 ------- ""------- ----------
01301 513504508 REDWOOD ROAD-500 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH AND 1175 SOUTH 1281 SOUTH 3,893 201,500 --'------------- ---
01301 513301844 1300 EAST-5600 SOUTH TO VINE STREET 2,400 192,000 - ------^---- -
---
_01301 513301841 3300 SOUTH METROPOLITAN WAY 64 51,386
01301 513301840 2850 EAST 3100 SOUTH TO NORTH END OF STREET(ABT 3040 SOUTH) 508 78,915 ----""- ---- --------
01301 513301827 3135 SOUTH.3175 SOUTH 3215 SOUTH:2900 EAST 3075 EAST 5,847 325,000 - -"-- --- -
OF0
I 4xeelbutlget20014.esl,4w1 CIPcesMkw200f IC
Sail Lake City Corporation
Last
Update
Omm•� amoelvnne Vh6eer 2/28/20038/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAR AFAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
CENTER' NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 200203 2003-04 200406 2005-06 2006.07 2007.2008 2008.2009 2009-2010 2010.2011 2011-2012
01301 513301790 BARCON ROAD-EDGEWOOD DRIVE TO NEIGHBHOR LANE _ 518 40o72
01301 513301790 NEIGHBOR LANE-BARCON ROAD TO 5600 SOUTH 460 22,500 -- ---' ---
01301 513301790 WOODCREST(1720 E)-LAKEWOOD DRIVE(5420 S)TO 5600 SOUTH 1,210 78,850 -- --
01301 513301790 LONE PEAK DRIVE(5465 S)-EDGEWOOD DRIVE(1530 E)TO WINWARD DRIVE(5510 S) 1,495 97,175 1 - -- -- ----
01301 513301790 LAKEWOOD DRIVE(54205)-EDGEWOOD DRIVE(1530 E)TO WOODCREST DRIVE(17201 1,450 94�250
01301 513301790 WINWARD DRIVE(55102)-EDGEWOOD DRIVE(1530E)TO FAIROAKS DRIVE(1680E) 1,150 66,212
01301 513301790 FAIROAKS DRIVE(1680 E)-LONE PEAK DRIVE(5485 S)TO 5600 SOUTH 955 54,154 MIME -- --- -"--------------
01301 513301790 EDGEWOOD DRIVE(1530 E)-LAKEWOOD DRIVE(5420 S)TO 5600 SOUTH 1,260 71,452 - --- -----------------------
01301 513301771 JUPITER DRIVE(3935 E)-WASATCH BOULEVARD(3555 S)TO VIEW CREST DRIVE(4390 F 5,740 400,000 ----- --"'- ----------------
01301 513301817 COLLEGE STREET(4580 S)-1025 EAST TO BROOKWOOD CIRCLE(1130 E) I- 1,030 66,060 11111.11111.1 - - ------ ""---'"-------------
01301 513301796 KINGS HILL DRIVE(3710 E)-WILLOW CANYON DRIVE(8905 S)TO KINGS HILL PLACE(90: 855 55575 11111
MI
01301 513301795 VILLAGE GREEN ROAD(68105)-SPRINGBROOK(1720 E)TO MEADOW DOWNS WAY(17 350 22,760 -"-'-- '- - -----
01301 513301690 4500 SOUTH-2700 EAST TO HIGHLAND DRIVE(1750 EAST) 49,782 =MEI - - ----------------- --
01301 VARIOUS 1,238
TOTAL 108,018 4,791,425
= - - --- --"--------- ----
01301 513504710 G4-1 CAROUSEL STREET(1540 W)-DUPONT AVENUE(1335 N)TO 1200 NORTH 1,200 78,000 IIIIM- --_ -__ _'-
01301 513504855 G4-1 1000 NORTH-BUCCANEER DRIVE(1160 W)TO 1200 WEST I 175 11,375 - - ---------------
MINNIIMI
01301 513504856 G4-1 LAFAYETTE DRIVE(700 N)-1200 WEST TO LAMARNE STREET(1130 W) 460 29.900�- - ----------- ----------
01301 513504729 G4-2 AMERICAN AVENUE(960 S)-1100 WEST TO EMERY STREET(1170 W) 670 43,550 MIIIIMIMMINIMMIN -- -- -------
01301 513504718 G4-2 FREMONT AVENUE(11205)-EMERY STREET(1170 W)TO 1100 WEST 665 43.225-1111.... - ------ ----
01301 513504730 G4-2 BURBANK AVENUE(1450 W)-GLENDALE DRIVE(11555)TO REDWOOD DRIVE(119 620 40,300-- -- ---------'--'---"----
01301 513504718 G4-2 PROSPECT STREET(1615 W)-1330 SOUTH TO 1350 SOUTH 180 11,700 M - ---- _----------- ---- -------
01301 513504837 G4-2 900 WEST-1300 SOUTH TO CALIFORNIA AVENUE 335 21,775 - ----- - -- ---'-------
01301 513504838 G4.2 REMINGTON WAY(1125 S)-800 WEST CIRCULAR-1150 SOUTH TO 1190 SOUTH 1,300 84,500 MIME --------'--- ------ ---" --
01301 513504842 G4-2 300 SOUTH-REDWOOD ROAD TO 1741 WEST 405 26,3250
01301 513504845 G4-2 500 SOUTH-NAVAJO STREET(1350 W)TO CONCORD STREET 600 39,000
01301 513504836 G4-2 1000 WEST-APPROX.2615 SOUTH TO 2860 SOUTH(>) - 310 20,150
01301 513504734 G4-3 1200 EAST-MILTON AVENUE(1595 S)TO LOGAN AVENUE(1810 S) 595 38,675 - ---------- --"- --"-- ----
01301 513504833 G4-3 BROWNING AVENUE(1400 S)-500 EAST TO 600 EAST 925 60,125 - --- ----"-- --- -- ------"-
01301 513504717 G4-3 LOGAN AVENUE(1625 S)-BLAIR STREET(345 E)TO DENVER STREET(440 E) 840 54,600 ---- -'-------'----- -- -- ----
01301 513504730 G4-4 PAXTON AVENUE(11805)-300 WEST TO 400 WEST 1,665 108.225El
-------- ------ -' "- ---' --'-
01301 513504848 G4-4 300 WEST-1300 SOUTH TO 1500 SOUTH 1,600 104,000
--- ----- ---- --- -- --____
01301 513504839 G4-4 1600 SOUTH-APPROX 338 WEST TO APPROX.390 WEST 720 46,800 -- -"------- -"
_01301 513504840 G4-4 1700 SOUTH-450 WEST TO 500 WEST 460 29,900 ---- ------ '-- ----- -- ---
01301 513504841 G4-4 1700 SOUTH-300 WEST TO APPROX 400 WEST 720 48,800 ------- '
01301 513504842 G4-0 200 SOUTH-ORANGE STREET(1900 W)TO REDWOOD ROAD(1700 W) 1,130 73,450
01301 513504843 G44 400 SOUTH-EMERY STREET(1170 W)TO 1150 WEST 174 11,310
01301 513504845 G4-5 REDWOOD(1700 W)-300 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH(WEST SIDE 12") 768 49,920- ------- "- --- ------
ERI
01301 513504890 G4-5 ORANGE STREET(1900 W)-NORTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH 1,520 98,800 M --
01301 513504891 G4-5 NORTH TEMPLE-REDWOOD ROAD(1700 W)TO ORANGE STREET(1900 W)6"MAI 1,264 82,160
01301 513504846 G4-8 300 WEST-INTERSECTION OF 300 WEST AND 600 NORTH 27 1,755 -- ----- - ------- -----
01301 513504847 G4-8 300 WEST-500 NORTH TO 800 NORTH 815 52,975 ---- ------- -__---
01301 513504849 G4-8 500 WEST-450 NORTH TO 500 NORTH 460 29,900 ii=E
---- --------- -------___- ___
01301 513504714 G48 BOO WEST-APPROX.14 SOUTH TO APPROX.88 NORTH 683 44,395
01301 5)3504806 G46 200 NORTH-400 WEST TO 500 WEST 855 55,575- ---- -------'--------__.-. _ -- -- ----
01301 513504835 G4-7 INDIANA AVENUE(830 S)-APPROX 1800 WEST TO APPROX 1925 WEST 1,148 74,620 --- -- '------- - -- ---
01301 513504851 G4-7 PROSPECT(1815 W)-CALIFORNIA AVENUE TO APPROX 1365 SOUTH I 350 22,750 - ---------'------
01301 513504852 G4-7 INDUSTRIAL ROAD(1900 W)-CALIFORNIA AVENUE(1320 S)TO 1500 SOUTH 950 61,750 ------'------
_01301 513504863 G4-7 CONCORD(1250 W)-INDIANA AVENUE TO 900 SOUTH I 320 20,800 -- -- --- - - ------
_01301 513504806 G4-8 SCENIC DRIVE(2745 E)-COMMON WEALTH AVENUE NORTH TO THE END OF THE C 1,955 127.075 --- "- ---'---'-'--
01301 513504807 G4-8 SCENIC DRIVE(2745 E)-COMMON WEALTH AVENUE(2130 S)TO THUNDERBIRD DF 1,283 83,395 -"--"- --------'-------
01301 513504808 G4-8 2600 EAST-FOOTHILL DRIVE(1941 S)TO APPROX 1815 SOUTH I 1,022 66,430 -- -----'--- -- ---- ---
01301 513301802 G4-9 MONTEVERDE DRIVE(3750 E)-CRESTWOOD DRIVE(3320 S)TO EASTWOOD DRIVI 605 51,425 -'-- -_-'-- -"-- -" -- -'- -- --
01301 513301859 G4-9 KIABAB WAY(3620 E)-YOSEMITE DRIVE(3190 S)TO EXISTING 4"REDUCER APPR( 469 39,865 -- ----- --""-- - ---- - -"- --
01301 513301860 G4-9 SEQUOIA AVENUE(3620 E)-PLATEAU DRIVE(3555 E)TO CASCADE WAY(3600 E) 512 43,520 - -------"-----'�--------- -" ---
01301 513301861 G4.9 RAINER AVENUE(3600 E).PLATEAU DRIVE(3555 E)TO CASCADE WAY(3100 S) 605 51,425 -- - - ------"- -- --'--'--
01301 513301862 G4-9 CASCADE WAY(3100 S)-WASATCH BOULEVARD(3565 E)TO 3660 EAST 1,337 113,645 --- - ----'- -' __ -- -- -----
01301 513301863 G4-9 3100 SOUTH-CASCADE WAY(3600 E)TO WEST TO THE END OF THE CIRCLE 190 16,150 MIMI ----- -------"-- - -'---- -- -- ----
01301 513301864 G4-9 PALISADE DRIVE(3145 S)-KIABAB WAY(3620 E)TO APPROX 3570 EAST 325 27,625 11=1-
01301 513301865 G4-9 3660 EAST-CASCADE WAY(3100 S)TO TETON DRIVE(3760 E) 290 24,850 - --- -------- - --- ---- - --
01301 513301866 G4-9 YOSEMITE DRIVE(3190 S)-TETON DRIVE(3760 E)TO 3580 EAST 1,068 90,780111MM ----- ---- -'-"-- --'-------
01301 513301867 G4-9 3580 EAST-YOSEMITE DRIVE(3190 S)TO THE END OF THE STREET 446 37,910 -------- -- -""----- -"-" --
01301 513301868 G4-9 PLATEAU DRIVE(3555 E)-PALISADE DRIVE(3145 S)TO YOSEMITE DRIVE(3190 S) 400 34,000 _. -_"_------------ -----
01301 513301822 G4-9 HEUGHS CANYON WAY(3405 E)-HEUGHS CANYON CIRCLE(3390 E)TO WASATCH 795 67,575=MIMI - --------------------- -
01301 513301795 G4-10 BONITA DRIVE(3525 S)-ALTA VISTA STREET(1145 E)TO 1200 EAST I 410 34.850-� ---- ----- ---------------
-01301 513301804 G4-10 GLORIETA STREET(3560 5)-ALTA VISTA STREET(1145 E)TO 1200 EAST 410 34,850- --- - '---- - --
01301 513301805 G4-10 3580 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO ALTA VISTA STREET(1145 E) I__ 380 32,300- --- ------- ---- '------
01301 513301808 G4-12 MARGIE AVENUE(3160 S)_METROPOLITAN WAY(3165 E)TO METRO WAY(3280 E 950 80.7501.............M11 ---- ---- -.-- -------
_01301 513301815 G4-12 MARIE AVENUE(3105 S)-METROPOLITAN WAY(3165 E)TO VALLEY STREET(330( 880 74,800 1EM '-- --------- -------
01301 513301816 G4-13 PRESTON STREET(1920 E)-ATKIN AVENUE(2830 S)TO MARY DOTT WAY(2925 S _ 800 68.0001.M. - ----------------------
01301 513301817 G4-14 3080 EAST-BONNIE BRAE AVENUE(4275 S)TO 4500 SOUTH I 1,120 95.200 -- ---------------
01301 513301818 G4-14 SHANNA STREET(2870 E)-NILA WAY(4140 S)70 BLUE BELL DRIVE(4210 S) 955 81,175- -- - --'---'---
01301 513301818 G4-14 MORNINGSTAR DRIVE(2560 E)-OLYMPUS DRIVE(4155 S)TO ROWLAND DRIVE(4 565 48.025- - - ----
01301 513301887 G4-14 2701 EAST-3955 SOUTH TO 4215 SOUTH I 618 52,551 __---___-
01301 513301811 G4-15 MEADOWMOOR ROAD(4995 S)-1645 EAST TO WEST MOOR ROAD(1665 E) 640 54,400 - -'------- --
01301 513301822 G4-15 MILLBROOK DRIVE(3465 S)-HONEYCUT ROAD(1850 E)TO 2000 EAST 1,350 114,750 ♦OF
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 1• • • •
wipww • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • r• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I
Ili S.It Lake City CPrpo.iSn
Last Update
' Department of Palle Unllbee 2/28/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
' 2003 thru 20012
I
COST PROJECT growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAR YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH'CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 2002.03 2003.04 200445 2005.09 2005.07 2007-2005 2005.2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
01301 513301812 G4.16 4045 SOUTH-RALPH STREET(1375 E)TO 1450 EAST(BID WITH 1450 EAST AND 31 565 48,025
01301 513301813 G4-16 1450 EAST-3990 SOUTH TO 4045 SOUTH(BID WITH 4045 SOUTH AND 3990 SOUTI 450 _ 38,250 -- ---- --"----'""------- ----
01301 513301814 G4-17 3990 SOUTH-1400 EAST TO 1500 EAST(BID WITH 4045 SOUTH 8 1450 EAST) 630 53,550 ---"---------`"---"'----'-- ----'-- ---
01301 513301529 300 EAST-3300 SOUTH TO 3900 SOUTH H 40 80,000 ---
TOTAL Mil 46,974 3,466,031
01301 513504825 G5-1 SHERWOOD DRIVE(1320 S)-DOVER ROAD(2540 E)TO ROXBURY ROAD(2640 E) 1,550 131,708 -- -- --- - ---
01301 513504826 G5-1 SHERWOOD DRIVE(1320 S)-CANTERBURY DRIVE(2865 E)TO AMBASSADOR WAY 1,690 143,650 - ---- -------- - --- - -------
01301 513504804 G5-1 NO7TINGHAM WAY(1370 5)-DOVER ROAD(2540 E)TO ROXBURV ROAD(2840 E) __1,831 155,593 --- ----`"-'-"------"-- �- --
-01301 513504830 GS-2 BONNEVILLE DRIVE(2700 E)-ST MARY'S WAY(1200 S)TO OAKHILLS WAY(1078 S) 1,971 167,535 --- -------'-- - '- �-
01301 513504829 G5-2 MERCEDES WAY(2886 E)-OQUIRRH DRIVE(1185 S)TO CRESTVIEW DRIVE(2770 E 845 71,825 -- -- ---------- ---- - ------
01301 513301797 G5-2 ALTON WAY(2820 E)-OQUIRRH DRIVE(1186 S)TO 1148 SOUTH I 1 633 53,781- ------- -------- ---- - - ---
01301 513504880 G5-2 OAK HILLS WAY(2745 S)-CRESTVIEW DRIVE(1010 S)TO ST MARY'S WAY(1200 S 1,759 149,515 - -- - -- - -
01301 513504881 G5-2 CANTERBURY DRIVE(2865 E)-SHERWOOD DRIVE(1320 S)TO 1332 SOUTH 106 9,010 -- - ------- -------- ---- -----
01301 513504882 G5-2 OOUIRRH DRIVE(11855)-ST MARY'S WAY(2912 E)TO OAK HILLS WAYI(2745 E) 1,481 125885- ----'-------'---- - ----- ---- -----
01301 513504883 G5-2 CRESTVIEW DRIVE(1010 S)-OAKHILLS WAY(2745 E)TO CRESTVIEW CIRCLE(285 315 26,775 - - -'------'------------ ----- --------- -----
01301 513504864 G5-3 REDWOOD ROAD(1700 W)-1100 SOUTH TO CALIFORNIA AVENUE(WES4SIDE MAI 1,683 141,355 -� --"------'- '--- - "---- '---
01301 513504865 G5-3 REDWOOD ROAD(1700 W)-500 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH(WESTSIDE MAIN) 2,230 189,550 - -- - - ----------- _----- -- '- ---
01301 513504832 G5-4 BUCCANEER DRIVE(1180 W)-DUPONT AVENE(1335 N)TO 1200 NORTH I 960 81,800 -- ----------- --- --------- -- ___01301 513504862 G5-4 DULUTH AVENUE(1550 N)-900 WEST TO DEXTER STREET(840 W) = 360 30,600
01301_ 513504884 G5-5 1300 SOUTH STREET-2300 EAST TO ROXBURY ROAD(2640 E) 2,723 231,455 -- ------ ----- - -- - ------- --01301 513504885 G5-5 1300 SOUTH STREET-WASATCH DRIVE(2520 E)TO 2300 EAST M 1,080 91,800 '--------- -' ---- -
-01301 513504886 G5-5 2300 EAST-1300 SOUTH TO FOOTHILL DRIVE(2800 E) MINIM1,015 --- 86,275
01301 513504888_ G5-8 BELAIRE DRIVE(2910 E)-SCENIC DRIVE(2278 S)TO GLENOAKS DRIVE(2180 S) 1,164 98,940 ---
01301 513504807 G5-6BROADMOOR STREET(2640 E)-WASATCH DRIVE(1920S)TO 2100 SOUTH 1,090 _ 92,650 ------------'-'-'--- ------ --- ---
01301 513504889 G5-7 CENTER STREET(50 W)-300 NORTH TO APRROX 630 NORTH AND 600 NORTH CEI 2,840 241,400- '----'-----'----- ---- -- ------ - - ----
01301 513504738 G5-7 17TH AVENUE(850 N)-HILLTOP ROAD(645 E)TO LITTLE VALLEY ROAD(880 E) 2,185 185,725-------- --- -------- -- ------- --- --- - - ----
-01301 513504887 G5-8 1300 EAST-600 SOUTH TO 700 SOUTH I I 825 70,125___--- - ---- ---- ------ - -- - ---- ---
01301 513301883 G5-9 HOLLY HOCK HILL(7180 S)/WATER MILL WAY(3230 E)-SAGEBRUSH WAY(3165 E; 1,050 89,250 ---------' - - - ---
-_01301 513301884 G5-9 2870 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7230 SOUTH I 1,500 127,500 --- -- - __ ---_-- -- -'"- - -- -- _-
01301 513301885 G5-9 2825 EAST-FORT UNION BOULEVARD(7000 S)TO 7230 SOUTH i 1,450 123,250 --------------- ------- ----
-01301 513301886 G5-10 4895 SOUTH-900 EAST TO 1070 EAST 1,500 127,500 - ---------------- --- -- -- - --
01301 513301797 G5-10 2700 EAST-3955 SOUTH TO 4215 SOUTH 2 025
--'- -- I ___ _1_72,125
01301 513504735 G5-10 EASTCLIFF DRIVE(4395 S)-FORTUNA WAY(3605 E)TO END OF EASTCLIFF CIRCI 950 80,750 - ---- -- ----- -------- - - -
"- -01301 513301873 GS-11 CREEK ROAD(7400 S)-DANISH ROAD TO APPROX.3000 EAST
_ 650 73,355_
01301 513301874 G5-11 8330 SOUTH-2200 EAST TO 2300 EAST 863 73,355 -- --"- ---- --""--- --" -- - ---
_01301 513301875' G5-12 SANDPIPER WAY(1370 E)-1390 EAST TO SPRING LANE(5150 S) I 909 77,265 - - "--" -- --------- ------ --- --- -- ---- -
01301 513301876 G5-12 SPRING LANE DRIVE(5155 S)-SADDLEBACK DRIVE(1605 E)TO GUERENE DRIVE 683 58,055
66,300 -----'--------------- - --- ---
01301 513301877 G5-12 SOUTH MOORE DRIVE(5090 S)-WEST MOORE ROAD(1725 E)TO MOORE MONT I 780 -- --- --------�---- --- ---- - -----
01301 513301878 G5-12 EAST MOORE ROAD(1770 E)-SOUTH MOORE DRIVE(5090 S)TO SPRING LANE(5 960 gi gpp ------------------
01301 513301879 G5-13 6400 SOUTH-1300 EAST TO RODEO LANE(1545 E)AND 1300 EAST-APPROX 593 5,000 425,000 -- ----------------- ----- - ------ -----
01301 513301880 G5-14 SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)-SANTA ROSA DRIVE(3275 E)TO EL SERRITO DRI 980 83,300 -
01301 513301881 G5-14 LOS ALTOS STREET(3370 E)-SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)TO DEL VERDE AVE 740 62,900 --- ------------ --- ------ -01301 513301882 G5-14 PLAZA WAY(3320 E)-SANTA ROSA AVENUE(3325 S)TO APPROX 3382 SOUTH 486 ---'--- --''- ------------
-- - I _ 41,310--
TOTAL I 50,841 4,321,461 ---
01301
00 WEST-1200 SOUTH
01301 ABRPORT 24'LOOP-2200 TO 2100 2900 NORTH,2300 NORTH BACK TO AIRPORT 7,300 -----' - --------------- ---- -- ---
1,825,000
RT(24") 25,000
--- 3,750,000
01301 1300 EAST-4500 SOUTH TO 6400 SOUTH(12") 15,000 ------ ----------------- ------ --
---_-- 1.500,000
01301 LOWER PARLEY'S CONDUIT-PARLEY'S WAY TO APPROX 1300 SOUTH(SLIT 20% 17,000 -- -- -----3,400,000
01301 ARTESIAN BASIN LINES-3300 SOUTH TO 3900 SOUTH,MARCUS RES TO ARTESIAN BA, 20,000 3,000,000
01301 VICTORY ROAD LINES-PUMP STATION TO ENSIGN DOWNS(18") 20% 9,000 -'- '------'' ------- - ------- - ---
_ _ _ 2,250,000 01301 UNIVERSITY LINE-FORT DOUGLAS TO TOMAHAWK DRIVE(16") 2,500 ~___ ----- __ 250,000 _
01301 MILLCREEK TREATMENT PLANT LINE-TANK TO WASATCH BLVD(24") 3,000 750.000
01301 2700 SOUTH-13TH EAST TO PARK RESERVOIR(16") 17,000
-- ------------------- -- - ------ --
4,250000
000
01301 CITY CREEK TREATMENT LINE TO MORRIS RESERVOIR(12"OR 18'MATCH EXISTING) 2,000 - ------' ---------------------'4W 000-------
01301 NORTH BENCH LINE TO PARRY'S HOLLOW(12") 4,000 -- ----------------------400,000- -.-_-
-01301 513301788 900 EAST-5260 SOUTH TO 5600 SOUTH =��1.1� 2,210 -- --- ------ 198,000
01301 513301823 5600 SOUTH-850 EAST TO 900 EAST M(L'i 440 ------------------ -- -- '--- ----28,600
01302 HIGHLAND DRIVE-3300 SOUTH TO 4500 SOUTH MIMI. -
01303 1300 EAST-VINE STREET(6085 S)TO 8400 SOUTH 10,000
- _ 900,000
01301 _513504852 NORTH BENCH SUPPLY TO UNIVERSITY OF UTAH I -- 2,000 279,000
01301 513504851 ENSIGN TANKS TO MORRIS RESERVOIR 2,000 -------------- 404,591
■_ 445,529175,000
01301 513301529 300 EAST-3300 SOUTH TO 3900 SOUTH 4 eqp -- - -
01301 PARLEYS LOWER CONDUIT-2100 TO 100 SOUTH - - ---- , -
-01302 UPGRADE SYSTEM FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN THE COUNTY EXCHANGE ARILM
- -7000,500 7,000,000
01301 VARIOUS WATER LINES 1,250.000 1,250,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000_ 3,000,000
4,791,425 3,466,031 4,321,461 1,250,000 1,250,000 3,000,000 7,900,000 9,000,000 15,300,000, 18,005,720
1
_ •
TOTAL DISTRIBUTION MAINS&HYDRANTS --_ - 7,330,541 5,106.831 5,621,461 2,400,000 2,400,000 4,390,000 9,540,000 10,640,000 16,940,000 19,645,720
WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS•2730.09
1 I Mrc.Mudget2001\ca.M111a,CIPca.M1,s,2oO4 xis
Sdt lake Clq Corpontbn Last Update
Deportment of Public Uhlt0tt 2/28/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAH YEAK YEAH YEAH YEAH'
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 200243 2003-04 200405 2005-06 200647 2007-2008 2008.2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
02201 51390014 LARGE METER REPLACEMENTS 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
01701 51390015 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENTS 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 1,500_000 1,500,000 1.500,000 1,500,000
02401 51390016 SMALL METER PROGRAM _ 300,000 300,000 300,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000
03301 51390017 NEW SERVICE CONNECTIONS 200000 200,000 200,000 200000_-- 20000.0 200,000 200000 200.000 200,000 200000
51390018 SERVICE LINE CONNECTION UPGRADES 280,272 - ------ ---"--- - -"
03201 51390020 WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1,944,831 1,300,000 1,300,000
4,025003 3,100,000 3,100,000 1,850,000 1,850,000 1,850,000 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000 2,450,000
LANDSCAPING-273040
03201 DAY RIVERSIDE DETENTION CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENTS 30,000 --- ----------------- '"-'"
03201 WASHINGTON SQUARE-CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENTS 40,000 - '-- - --- --- ''----- --
03201 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING-CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENTS _ 30,000 30,000 --� - -- --------'-
VARIOUS LOCATIONS 50,000 50,000150,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000- 50,000
- 70,000 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS _-- 12,806,225 22,007,831 9,410.461 5,556,000 6,020,000 20,903.750 40,732,875 27,835,000 28,790.000 38,915.720
IMIONIII
275010 AUTOMOBILES&TRUCKS - - --- ------------ - - -----
02301 VARIOUS 714,000 728,280 742,846 ---757,703 772,857
00101 1-TON CAB&CHASSIS W/DUMP BED - 50,000
00101 1-10 WHEEL DUMP TRUCK
110,000 110,000
00101 1-3/4 TON 4 WHEEL DRIVE PICKUP ----- ---- 32,000 42,000---------- ------ �- -- - ---- - - -
00101 2-S 15 PICKUP TRUCKS W/CLUB CAB - -"'--- '- ---- -' -- -------- -- - ---
00101 1-3/4 TON PICKUP 2WD --- -- __ 25,000 -- - -- ---00101 1-ONE TON CAB&CHASSIS TRUCK - -28,000-'- -- '---- --- - "--- -
00101 3-1/2 TON PICKUPS 4WD W/CLUB CAB - --- - - - 93,000 -- --- ----- ------` ---"--
00201 1-ONE TON 4x4 PICKUP ------- -- - '- - -- ------ -------- - - ------
30,000
00601 PICKUP TRUCK 4X4 -- -- 30,000 30,000 80,000 40,000 ---------- - ----- - ---- -- - -- ---
01301 2-FULL SIZED TRUCKS _- -- 48,000 24,000 48,000 48,000---- ---------- ------- --- - -- ---- --01401 3/4 TON EXT CAB 4X4 LONG BED 110,000 114,000 116,000 125,000 --- f- -- -- -- ----- -
01401 1 TON HD CAB&CHASSIS "-- ------------------------ --- ------01401 3/4 TON EXT CAB 4X4 LONG BED W/SHELL 114,000 - ---- -----"- "-------- '-- -- - --
01403 10 WHEEL DUMP TRUCK ------- ---- ------ -----
01401 UTILITY BODY FOR 3/4 TON LONG BED 20,000 - ----- ----------- -------
01501 4 X 4 SPORT UTILITIES VEHICLE -- --- -
51501 3/4 TON 4X4 W/UTILITIES BED J _ 35,000 71,000 -------- --- -- - -- -- - ---"---"-'
01601 2-FULL SIZED TRUCKS 24,000 24,000 24,000__ -----
01701 10 WHEEL DUMP TRUCK 240.000 260,000 300,000
01701 1/2 EXT CAB 4X4 SHORT BED W/SHELL - - -- --- ------- --------------- ------
01701 1 TON CAB&CHASSIS W/DUMP BED _ ----'- -- -- ----- - -- -- - --
01701 2 1/2 TON V&H TRUCK W/SERVICE BODY 220.000 230,000 240,000 300,000 - -- -"
02101 -SMALL FORKLIFT
02201 3/4 TON PICKUP TRUCK 4X4 W/RACK ------- 20,500 --"-- - -'-- - -'----- --------- ------ -- - - --
02201 1 TON HD CAB&CHASSIS W/DUMP BED - _ ___ 45,000
02201 _ 1 TON HD CAB&CHASSIS W/SELF CONTAIN WELDER&BED 40,000 - -
02201 2 1/2 TON CABS CHASSIS W/CONTRACTOR BODY&CEMENT MIXER - --- ---- -- -- --- - --02201 3/4 TON EXT CAB 4X4 SHORT BED W/SHELL I 28,800 52,000 ---
02301 3/4 TON EXT CAB 4X4 SHORT BED W/FUEL TANK 29.000--- ------- -------- -- - - -- -- ----- -----
02401 1/2 TON 4X4 EXT CAB SHORT BED 30,000
02401 1 TON W/UTILI7V SERVICE BODY 45,000
02402 1 TON HD CAB 8 CHASSIS W/SELF CONTAIN WELDER&BED 45,000 _
02401 3/4 TON PICKUP TRUCK 4X4 W/UTILITY BED 30,000 30,000 35,000 - ---02401 /2 TON PICKUP W/SHELL 25,800 3/4
0T501 3/4 TON 4x4 PICKUP W/EXT CAB 53,000 35,000 -------- --------- ---- ----02601 _2-1/2 TON PICKUPS 40,000 26,000 48,000 48,000 __ ---'-- ---�-
02801 -1/2 TON FULL SIZE TRUCKS 24,000 48,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 __ ------- -----
592,500 748.000 783,000 847,600 1.328,000 714,000 728,280 742,646 757.703 772,857
275030 FIELD MAINT EQUIPMENT-MOTIVE - ------ - -- - ----
00101 DR MOWER 5,000 --- ------- --__-___
00101 BACKHOE _ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000
2-SNOWMOBILES 16,000
00601 --- -'-- -� -----"--'
00601 -_QUADRUNNER 8,000 '-_ ____.__ ______
00801 1-BOAT FOR MT DELL AND LITTLE DELL 15,000
01701 FRONT END LOADER - 150,000 --------- ------ ----"--
01701 BACKHOE 4X4 180,000 170,000 170,000 200,000___ ------------01701 BACKHOE EXCHANGE PROGRAM 10,000 15.000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000_--_ 30,000 30,000 30,000
175,000 206,000 228,000 35,000 185,000 240,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
9 oFE
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • r• • • • • • • • • • • '0 ...•M{•. • • •
• wwwwww • • • • • • • • • • • • • •,• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I
Salt Lake City Corporation
Last Update
Department of Public Maio 2/28/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YI:AN CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION % PIPE 200243 2003,04 200405 200546 280847 2007.2009 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
02501 72 60 10 PUMP PLANT EQUIPMENT 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 r r rre 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
__ _ 45.00E--��
02501 ELECTRIC STARTER PANEL W/VARIABLE SPEED
IMIIMIIMMIIIIIOIIIMI
02501 SPARE 400 HP MOTOR 000 -=�- _
02501 SPARE 300 HP MOTOR FOR 8200 SOUTH 12,000
02501 SUGARHOUSE WELL FUSED DISCONNECT 10,000
02501 DIAGONAL WELL MOTOR =-=
02501 UPPER ELLISO WELL W VFD - __ 17 000.1.11.11110
02501 LOWER BOUNDARY NEW VFD_
02501 MOT OLYMPUS SOFT START M 8.00E
02501 BRINTON SPRINGS -- 38,000
02501 RESEARCH PARK MOTOR CONTROL MI= rnE- ao 50.0D00
02501 ARLINGTON HILLS MOTER CONTROL MEM 1111
02501 620E SOUTH VFD -- -
02501 DYER'S INN WELL _ 50.00E
-_ 42,000 145.00E 100.000 182 000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000
276020 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT ME= - E __ _
00001 VARIOUS
0 _ __
100,000 100,000 100.000 100_000 100.000
00801 POLY 400ESPECTROPHOTOMETER 7,000
00801 POLYMER FEEDERS FOR PLANT FILTERS =NM13,000
= -'---- ----- ----- -- ---- ----- -
00801 TWO CATIONIC POLYMER FEEDERS -- 13,000 KU
E0801 ' POLYMER FEEDERS FOR PLANT FILTERS 13,000
00801 REPLACE PLANT SCADA AND OFFICE COMPUTERS 24,50E
00801 _ 1720 D FINISH&FILTERS WATER TURBIDMETERS '- 21�==-_
00801 _ POLYMER FEEDERS FOR FILTERS -13,00E 13,00E
00801 FLUORIDE FEEDER FOR 80,000
00801 BRYNEER BRINE TANK SYSTEM FOR HYPOCHLORITE GENERATION 05,000 ------
00801 TWO BOILERS FOR HEATING SYSTEM • 60,000 =�� -_ - __ _ _ _ ___-
00801 ELEVATOR CONTROL PANEL 30,000 00801 REPLACE PLANT PLC'S 100.00E- ___- - ___._ ___ _-
00901 BACKWASH TANK REPAIR --�--- __--_
00901 FLUORIDE FEEDER TANK -- 80000
00901 INSTRUMENTATION MANTENANCE 5,000 5,000-=
00901 REPLACEHSS TURBIDMETER
COMPUTERS 12,000 -_ - ___-__
00901 HACH SCADA
COMPUTERS
-' 3,250
00901 REPLACE FILE SERVER COMPUTER 5000=-
00901 HACH FILTER TRAP 880 LASER TURBIDMETER MEM3,000 M-009011 STREAMING CURRENT IN EQUI
01801 WATERSHED MONITORING MODULE
15,00E -_-
01801 I PILOT PLANT DISINFECTION MODULE 25,000 - -__
01801 PILOT PLANT TRAILER MEM
500EMEM
---------- -----"- - -- -
- 350,250 128,000 113.000 100,000 100.000 100.00E 100.00E 100.00E 100.00E
IMIIIMIIIMMIMIII
278030 TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT �� -____
MIMI
�01501 - TELEMETRY IMPROVEMENTS _ 50,000 25,000 r rrr 25,00E 50,00E 50,00E 50,00E 50,00E
50,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
276050 OFFICE FURNITURE&EQUIPMENTEll M�� -
03201 VARIOUS =M- 50,00E 50,000 r rre 1 rrr 50,00E
01301 NEW COPIER MIMI 15,00E -- -- 000
00801 UPGRADE SCADA SYSTEM-PARLEY'S 12,000 -02001 PHOTO COPIEREWE8 000
02001 OFFICE FURNITURE 700E
02201 OFFICE FURNITURE 10.000 0E-= --_
02901 BILLINGEWCCOMPUTER 150000-
02901 NEW COPIER 1500E--
03201 _SOFTWARE UPGRADE TO XP
30.00E _30,000- 30.00E 30.00E r r e r ____30,00E
03201 NEW COPIER MEN 15'� ____-.--
03201 51440002 NEW VOICE MAIL SYSTEM IMI ==- -
_- 0 72,000 52,000 160,000 88,000 50,000 80,000 50,000 80,000 50,000 80,000
NMI 1.1.1 ..1
276090 OTHER NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT __ _ ___ _ __
_ ____ _ __ __ __
MEM
03201 VARIOUS
00101 D R MOWER - .00
50.00E 50,000 50,000 50.00E 50E 50,000__-50,00E
3,20E
OF it
Ilevc.Mwipel2001ka,Rbw\C,PraaNlow20W eb
Salt Lake City Corpora lion
Department of Public Velma. L891 9
2/28/200/2003
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 20012
COST PROJECT Growth FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1L PIPE 2002413 2003.04 2004-05 200S-06 2006.07 2007-2008 2005-2003 2009.2010 2010.2011 2011-2012
00201 STREAM GAUGING AUTOMATION 8 CANYON METERS 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
00801 BOAT HOUSE WINCH 5000 — — — ----------
01001 ELECTRONIC TEST GUAGE 5,000 — - —"--- --"—'--
01401 VALVE OPERATOR 8 POWER TAKE OFF —----
01501 SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM 20,000 - --------------- ----- -----
01501 BATTERY FOR UPS 8,000 — —---- -----------
02101 COVER FOR VALVES 20,000 20,000 —"-----" ----
02201 WELDER FOR SHOP ---- 5,000 --- -------------- --- ------
02501 SPARE ELECTRIC MOTORS 25000 ------- --------------
02501 REPLACE OVERHEAD DOORS-SHOPS 12,000 12,000 --- --------- ---
03001 REPLACE CONFINED SPACE MONITORS 125,000
03001 MISCELLANEOUS IHC SAFETY 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
02,000 87,000 33,200 83,000 75,000 175,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
--- TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,303,750 1,447,500 1,482,200 1,373,800 2,093,000 1,434,000 1,113,280 1,157,846- 1,142,703 1,187,857
TOTAL CAPITAL 14,199,915 23,455,331 10,892,661 6,929,600 8,113,000 22,337,750 41,846,155 28,992,8461 29,932,703 40,103,577
•
8OF 9
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4,4,4,0, • • 0
•
•
• •' ick
iardina
• Associates, Inc.
& Memorandum
•
• January 29, 2003
•
•
• To: City Council Members, Salt Lake City
• From: Rick Giardina, RGA Water Rate Study Project Manager
•
• Re: February 6, 2003 Water Rate Study Briefing
•
• In August 2002, the Department of Public Utilities engaged in a process with RGA to develop a
• multi-year financial plan, evaluate the current water rate structure and consider alternative rate
• approaches. The purpose of this process was for RGA to perform a cost of service analysis and
• work with the Department and a citizen subcommittee to advise the Public Utilities Advisory
Committee(PUAC) on the best rate approach for the Department to implement. The name of the
subcommittee formed for this process is the Public Utilities Advisory Committee Water Rate
• Subcommittee (WRS).
•
• The WRS members met on six different occasions during which customer usage characteristics,
• system design and cost information, and related information was presented and discussed. In
• addition, the Department organized a facilities tour for WRS members. The meetings were held
on the following dates:
11,S
August 29, 2002
. September 13, 2002—Facilities Tour
September 19, 2002
• October 9, 2002
• October 22, 2002
. November 19, 2002
December 19, 2002
A brief summary of the meetings is provided in this memorandum for the purpose of outlining
. the major milestones of the process.
Members of the City Council and Mayor's staff attended WRS meetings. On two separate
occasions both the PUAC and the Mayor were briefed regarding WRS progress and
recommendations.
13741 East Rice Place•Suite 100•Aurora•Colorado•80015 •Phone 303/699-2690•Fax 303/699-2666
•
•
IP
A January 29,2003
Page 2 •
•
Review of WRS Meetings
•
Meeting 1: The first meeting provided an overview of the WRS process as well as history and •
background information on the water utility system. •
•
Meeting 2: Concepts of water rate design were presented, and distinctions were made between
different rate design approaches and objectives. A list of 11 rate design pricing objectives was •
developed and presented to the WRS for discussion and use in a"ranking" exercise. •
Subcommittee members scored each •
Table 1 objective on a scale of 1 to 7 with a ,
Pricing Objectives "7"indicating that the objective was of
Rank Objective Average the highest importance. The ranking •
Ranking of the objectives based on the average
1 Water Conservation 6.25 score from the scoring process is ,
2 Compliance w/Legal Authority 5.70 provided in Table 1.
3 Peak Usage Reduction 5.60 •
4 Growth Pays for Itself 5.40 Water conservation was ranked highest •
5 Cost-of-Service Equity 5.00 with an average score of 6.25; items •
6 Social Equity 4.80 ranked 2 throu 4 scored from 5.4 to
7 Revenue Stability 4.80 •
8 Customer Impact 4.35 5.7 indicating roughly equal ranking. •
9 Customer Acceptance 4.30 Items ranked 5 and 6 were also ranked
10 Administrative Ease(tied) 3.50 nearly equal at 5.0 and 4.9, •
10 Large Volume Customers(tied) 3.50 respectively. Based on these results, •
and given the WRS agreement that the
•
rates should unquestionably include"Compliance w/Legal Authority,"the top 3 objectives for
the new water rates to address are: •
•
❑ Water Conservation
•
❑ Peak Usage Reduction
U Growth Pays for Itself •
•
The relatively high ranking of"Growth Pays for Itself'suggests that new customers should pay •
their full share for the water system through impact fees. This is consistent with the City's past •
practice of adopting impact fees reflective of the full cost of serving new customers. i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
111
•
• `'` January 29, 2003
• �A Page 3
•
• Table 2 is a description of the top-ranked objectives.
II
• Table 2
• Top-Ranked Pricing Objectives
Water Conservation—Effective in promoting Compliance with Legal Authorities—Meets all
• the efficient use of resources on a year-round known legal standards and requirements and
• basis. has minimum potential for legal challenge.
• Peak Usage Reduction—Assigns the cost of Growth Pays for Itself—Supports new
• providing peaking facilities to those customers housing, commercial,and industrial
• having significant peak to average water use development; allows the City to be rate
patterns, i.e., discourages the use of water competitive with adjacent and similar
0 during periods of peak demand. communities.
•
• Meeting 3: This meeting consisted of discussions on rate design concepts, introducing some
• alternative rate approaches to the WRS and discussing the differences between them. Based on
• this meeting, the WRS chose to evaluate three alternative rate approaches and compare them
with the City's current rate approach.
III
• One rate structure was designed after the Irvine Ranch Water District(in California)rate
• approach in which the utility develops water budgets for all users based on the number of people
occupying the facility being
• Table 3 metered, and the amount of
II Irvine Ranch Water District irrigation required to sustain the
. Inverted Block Rate Approach with a Monthly Service vegetation on the property according
Charge to an evapotranspiration calculation.
• 1 Tier Rate Use(1)
This structure is illustrated in Table
. (per ccf) (%of allocation) 3. As noted in Table 3 usage in each
Low Volume Discount(2) $0.53 0—40%II 1
block is priced at a rate 2 times
Conservation Base Rate $0.69 41 — 100%
• Inefficient $1.38 101 — 150% higher than the rate for the
Excessive $2.76 151 —200% preceding block. The Block 5 price
• Wasteful $5.52 >200% is set 8 times higher than Block 1 to
. (1)Allocation is determined based on persons per household effectively penalize the wasteful use
. (pphh)and landscaped area. Default or base values are: of water.
4 pphh
. 1,300 square feet for landscape area
(2)Based on 3 ccf per person per month;4 persons household.
• Equates to 12 ccf OR 9,000 gallons per month.
1110
•
•
•
A6. January 29, 2003 •
Page 4 •
•
Table 4 Another rate structure was based on the type of •
El Paso Water utilities •
rates used in El Paso, Texas. This approach
Peak Management Rate consists of using average winter consumption •
Block Price—$/ccf
1 4 ccf— 150%AWC $0.90/ccf (AWC) as the basis for defining inside and outside •
2 151 —300%AWC $1.52/ccf usage budgets. Three rate blocks were defined for
•
3 >300%AWC $1.90/ccf this rate approach as illustrated in Table 4.
•(1)AWC—average water consumption during the
winter period(represents indoor water use). The third rate approach is an inverted block rate •
Because sewer bills are also based on AWC, structure base on the type of rates implemented in •
customers do not have an incentive to over use
during the AWC period. Park City,Utah. This approach consists of .
defining rate blocks similar to
Park City Rate ApproachTable 5
those in the other two alternatives, •
but with specific usage levels set S
Seasonal/Inverted Block Structure—Residential/Irrigation .
Accounts for each block instead of allowing
Block Usage Range(gals.) Price Use Type individual user characteristics set •
(1)(5) (2) the blocks. Table 5 illustrates this
•
1 0—5,000 $1.25 Indoor Use(3) approach for residential customers. .
2 5,001 —30,000 $2.00 Irrigation(4) Each block would be priced at the
3 30,001 —80,000 $3.25 Excess Irrigation levels indicative of the costs of •
4 > 80,000 $5.00 Wasteful Use water service, with higher prices
(1)Applies to all single-family residential accounts. Ranges increase applied to the blocks for outdoor
by meter size for multi-family and irrigation accounts. •
(2)Rates shown apply from June—September. October—May usage usage and inefficient usage.
rate$1.75 per 1,000 gallons for all water use. Commercial •
accounts pay$1.75 per 1,000 gallons for all use year-round. Meeting 4: This meeting included •
(3)Average winter use—SFR. presentations and discussions •
(4)Irrigation allowance based on a 14,520 square foot lot(.33 acre)
with 50%irrigated area. regarding the Department's capital •
(5)SFR 3/4"fixed rate-$10.00 per month. improvement plan and the
corresponding financial plan. The •
Department's financial operating objectives were discussed in detail, identifying parameters and •
guidelines being used to ensure financial viability. •
One key aspect of the cost of service study was the determination that the ratio of costs for
customers outside the city to customers inside the city has changed from 1.50 to 1.35. In general •
terms, this means that costs of service have changed such that outside customer rates should now •
be based on being 1.35 times the inside city customer rates instead of 1.50 times inside city .
customer rates. There are a variety of reasons for this shift including a reduction in the cost of
debt and the return on equity that the City should be allowed to recover from users that are not •
within the City limits. •
Meeting 5: This meeting consisted of a more detailed evaluation of the most favored rate •
•
alternatives, a review of the WRS rate objectives as determined in Meeting 2, and a presentation
of the rate impacts each alternative would have on existing customers in terms of changes in •
monthly bills. Based on materials presented and the discussions held, the subcommittee decided •
•
•
•
January 29, 2003
•
Page 5
•
that it would choose between two final rate alternatives that would be compared at Meeting 6.
• The rate alternatives chosen for a final evaluation during Meeting 6 are:
•
Alternative 1 The current uniform seasonal rates adjusted for exclusion of the 5 ccf of usage
• that is included in the monthly fixed charge rates. These rates are based on a
3% increase in rates approved by the City Council for FY 2003-04.
•
• Alternative 2 The El Paso AWC approach for all customers. As usage increases for AWC
• up to 300% of AWC and then greater than 300%of AWC, the unit price also
• ine so bk l rntfiuo
levelscrases.. TheThe thirdec blocknd isloc pricedgenera higherly toeprese discouragesef inefcientfiocient td ours ewater and use is set
• at 300% of AWC.
Individual usage targets would be established for each irrigation-only account
. based on area, evapotranspiration rates, etc. Billing for irrigation users would
start at the Block 2 rate, and the Block 3 rate would apply to all use in excess
• of the target amount.
•
• Alternative 3 Residential customers would pay rates based on an Inverted Block-Seasonal
. rate design in the summer and a uniform seasonal rate in the winter. All non-
residential customers would pay a rate based on the El Paso AWC approach
with the exception of the Irrigation customers.
•• The Irrigation customers would pay the second block rate determined under
the AWC approach unless they exceed a targeted usage amount. The third
• block rate would be charged for any usage exceeding the targeted usage
• amount.
• Meeting 6: During the sixth meeting,the WRS held discussions on the merits of implementing
each of the alternatives identified in Meeting 5. Detailed customer bill impact comparisons were
IP presented to the subcommittee in order to compare the effectiveness each rate would have in
. achieving the top two goals of conservation and peak usage reduction.
• At the end of the meeting, a vote was held to select the rate approach that would be
recommended to the PUAC. The WRS chose Alternative 3, consisting of an inverted block rate
structure for residential water users, and an AWC block rate structure for non-residential
customers. These rate approaches were chosen on a vote of 9 to 6.
•
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
&A January 29, 2003
Page 6 •
•
•
Table 6 The inside City rates currently in effect are •
Current Water Rates and 3%Increase(1) shown in Table 6 and compared to rates as •
Description Current w/3% Increase adjusted for the adopted 3% increase. •
(3)
•
Volume Rate($/ccf)(2) At its January 8, 2003 meeting the PUAC
Winter $0.61 $0.63 endorsed the WRS rate recommendation.
Summer $0.93 $0.96 This recommendation (see Table 8)was •
Minimum Charge(3) (4) then presented to the Mayor who raised •
Meter Size several concerns that were addressed
5/8" $8.90 $9.15 through the refinement of rates as reflected
3/4" $8.90 $9.15 in Table 8. •
1" $8.90 $9.15 •
1 1/2" $24.44 $25.16 The rates shown on Tables 7 and 8 are for
•
2" $36.17 $37.24 inside City accounts; rates to outside •
3" $71.62 $73.75 customers would be 1.35 times greater. At
4" $109.99 $113.27 the February 6 Council meeting RGA will •
6" $233.99 $240.99 provide additional detail regarding these •
8" $348.99 $359.54 approaches and expected customer impacts.
10" $496.58 $511.46 •
(1)Inside city rates;outside city rates are 1.5 times higher. •
(2)Applies to use over 5 ccf.
(3)Includes a$0.50 per account watershed surcharge.
(4)Includes first 5 ccf of metered water use. •
•
•
ID
•
•
•
•
•
410
•
•
•
•
I
r
•
•
•
January 29,2003
ID &•
A Page 7
i
0 Table 7
111 WRS Recommended Rate Structure
III Current w/3%
S Description Increase WRS Proposal
(1) (2)
• Volume Rate($/ccf)
• Residential(3)
10 Winter $0.63 $0.72
• Summer $0.96
110
Summer Inverted Block Rates
II Block 1 0-9 ccf $0.72
ID Block 2 10-29 ccf $1.10
. Block 3 >29 ccf $1.53
111 Non-Residential AWC Rates
. Block 1 0%- 100%AWC $0.66
III Block
2 101%-300%AWC $0.90
Block 3 >300%AWC $1.35
111
• Irrigation Inverted Block Rates
. Block 2 Target Use $0.90
Block 3 >Target Use $1.35
II
. Minimum/Fixed Charge(4)
Meter Size
II
5/8" $9.15 $5.62
3/4" $9.15 $5.62
11/ 1" $9.15 $5.62
1.5" $25.16 $6.80
S 2" $37.24 $7.45
II 3" $73.75 $13.04
. 4" $113.27 $14.02
6" $240.99 $20.59
1110 8" $359.54 $37.66
10" $511.46 $70.50
. (1)Inside city rates;outside city rates are 1.5 times greater. Volume rates apply to all
use over 5 ccf. Minimum Charge includes 5 ccf.
. (2)Inside city rates;outside city rates are 1.35 times greater. Volume rates apply to all
usage. The new Fixed Charge does not include any usage amount.
110 (3)Under the current rate structure w/3%increase the winter and summer rates apply
10 to all use for all accounts.
(4)Includes a$0.50 per account watershed surcharge.
•
•
•
lb
A January 29,2003 •
Page 8 •
•
•
Table 8 •
Administration Rate Proposal •
Current w/3% WRS Administration I •
Description Increase Proposal Proposal ,
(1) (2) (2)
Volume Rate($/ccf) •
Residential(3) •
Winter $0.63 $0.72 $0.72 •
Summer $0.99 •
•
Summer Inverted Block Rates
Block 1 0-9 ccf $0.72 $0.72 •
Block 2 10-29 ccf $1.10 $1.10 •
Block 3 >29 ccf $1.53 $1.53 •
Non-Residential AWC Rates •
Block 1 0%- 100%AWC $0.66 $0.72 •
Block 2 101%-300%AWC $0.90 $1.10 •
Block 3 >300%AWC $1.35 $1.53
•
Irrigation Inverted Block Rates .
Block 2 Target Use $0.90 $1.10
Block 3 >Target Use $1.35 $1.53 •
•
Minimum/Fixed Charge(4) •
Meter Size •
5/8" $9.15 $5.62 $5.62
3/4" $9.15 $5.62 $5.62 •
1" $9.15 $5.62 $5.62 •
1.5" $25.16 $6.80 $6.80
2" $37.24 $7.45 $7.45 •
3" $73.75 $13.04 $13.04 •
4" $113.27 $14.02 $14.02 •
6" $240.99 $20.59 $20.59
8" $359.54 $37.66 $37.66 •
10" $511.46 $70.50 $70.50 .
(1)Inside city rates;outside city rates are 1.5 times greater. Volume rates apply to all use over 5 ccf.
Minimum Charge includes 5 ccf. •
(2)Inside city rates;outside city rates are 1.35 times greater. Volume rates apply to all usage. The new •
Fixed Charge does not include any usage amount.
(3)Under the current rate structure w/3%increase the winter and summer rates apply to all use for all •
accounts. •
(3)Includes a$0.50 per account watershed surcharge.
•
•
•
•
1111
. PUBLIC UTILITIES
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE MAJOR
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
• 2003-2012
•
• Category Description Cost•
Land Watershed property-Salt Lake City Public Utilities S4,000,000
. Purchases (PU) is constantly looking to purchase new watershed
. property that enhances our ability to control water
quality at the source.This program is funded by a
110 monthly assessment of$0.50 per account.
•
• Water Rights Water Stock purchases-The Department is $270,000
•
as Supply constantly looking to purchase culinary and irrigation
water stock that will would help decrease our
• responsibility to provide irrigation water and provide
• more culinary water to our customers.
• Contract negotiations with irrigation companies-
The Department during the next ten years will need to $10,000,000
purchase existing water rights from existing irrigation
110 companies or negotiate new contracts to eliminate the
. need to continue to deliver irrigation water under our
. existing exchange contracts.
110
. Maintenance Engineering Building Upgrade-The Engineering
as Repair building was purchased in 1985 for a short-term $1,500,000
Shops solution to housing our engineering staff and
watershed management. It currently is in need of a
. major upgrade or to be torn down and build a new
structure on the same site.
• New Laboratory Building-The current laboratory
1110 building at the Water Reclamation Plant was the old
administration building,which was converted to the $1,500,000
•
lab in the 1980's. Since that time that laboratory
functions have increased and the issues of air quality
due to location have caused continued problems. It is
. proposed that the Water Utility and the Sewer Utility
share in the cost of building a new facility.
111
11/ ' Cost is for the period 2002 through 2012.
Page 1 of 7
•
•
•
Canyon Restrooms Replacement-The need to $415,000 •
continue replace and upgrade the restrooms in each •
of the three canyons is an ongoing function to •
maintain water quality in the canyons.
•
Office and Shops Area-The Department over the $228,625 •
next ten years will need to asphalt the parking lots •
and parking area in the shops and office area. ,
Treatment • City Creek Water Treatment Plant-This project is $21,300,000 •
to rebuild the City Creek Water Treatment plant in •
three phases over a nine-year period. This will
upgrade the existing 42-year-old treatment plant •
and bring it up to current seismic standards. •
Failure of this plant could cause possible loss of
•
water rights and a major loss in revenue and service
to our customers.This is the primary source of •
supply to the central business district. This
project was delayed during the 2002-2003- •
budget year due to budget constraints due to a
possible revenue shortfall. If revenues fail to •
meet expectations this project will be delayed or •
will need to be funded by a bond issue. •
• Miscellaneous improvements-Various $15,304,000
improvements will be made to the Parley's and Big •
Cottonwood water treatment plants. •
• Fluoridation-PU is under mandate to add fluoride 41
to all our water sources by October 2003. This will $2,000,000
•
include fluoridation equipment at our three water
treatment plants and 20 well sites. •
• Mill Creek Treatment Plant - Construction .
of a new Treatment Plant at the mouth of Mill $6,000,000
Creek Canyon. Failure to construct the plant •
or negotiate new agreement could cause a loss •
of water rights. •
• Mt Dell Dam Valve replacement - The $500,000
current large valves at the base of the dam are
•
currently leaking and need replacement. •
•
Pumping We currently have 29 pump stations in our water
distribution system. Several major distribution-pumping
projects are contemplated. These include: •
•
•
•
Page2of7
•
• • Victory Road Pump Station (new)-This pump $1,500,000
. station will take water from the Victory Road Reservoir
. and pump it to the Ensign Reservoir. This will give
additional"gravity"flow supply to the downtown area.
• • North Bench Pumps Station (replacement)-The
• existing pump station pumps to the upper benches of $1,000,000
the Avenues area and is located near Morns reservoir.
. The existing pumps are not situated properly to take
advantage of the head available in the reservoir. The
new pumps will be lower and this will correct the
• hydraulic problems at the site.
• • General maintenance - Pump replacement at
• existing pump stations for a total of$100,000 per $964,000
year. This would allow us to upgrade one pump
. station per year. Failure to upgrade means
possible loss of service and water pressure during
summer months.
. • Upper Boundary Springs - Upgrade of the
existing 40 year old spring to maintain water $500,000
• quality and to secure water rights
ID Irrigation Regular improvements are needed to maintain the $546,000
• irrigation canals and flumes to continue to supply
. irrigation water and satisfy our current water exchange
customers.
•
Wells We continually make improvements to our well facilities.
Currently 24 wells are being used during summer
. months to meet peak demands. Several new projects are
planned:
• 3900 South Highland Drive Well -A new well is $1,000,000
proposed at this location. The city has water
. rights for a well at this location and construction
will preserve that water right. To maintain the
city's water rights a new well must soon be
• under construction. The State Engineer has
stopped granting extensions of time due to over
pumping of the east side aquifers (State Engineer
1991 Salt Lake Valley Interim Ground-Water
Management Plan). New well will service 3900 South
and Highland Drive increasing water pressure and
securing water rights.
S
Page 3 of 7
•
•
•
•
• Red Butte Well -This well will be located at the $1,200,000 •
mouth of Red Butte canyon near the arboretum. •
Water supply problems caused by high peak •
demands have increased with continued
development in and around the University of •
Utah area. Construction of the Red Butte Well •
will help solve supply and pressure problems for •
the upper University zone and protect our
unused water rights in this location. •
Construction of larger conduits will not be •
necessary to meet peak demands when the well •
begins operation.
•
• Mick Riley Well and pipelines - One of the $4,000,000 •
highest quality and least expensive water sources •
is the Artesian Basin located in a three-square-
mile area centered near the 900 East and •
Cottonwood diagonal. Currently this source •
supplies five percent of our summertime water
supply. Heavy corrosion of the line has caused
numerous failures and supply interruptions. The •
line has been replaced from 3300 South to 1700 •
South during recent years. Failure to replace •
this line could cause loss of pressure and fire
protection to the down town area during •
summer months. •
• Sugarhouse Park Well Treatment System $1,000,000 •
(1963) - In 1987 Perchloroethylene (PCE) from •
an unknown source infiltrated the aquifer which •
supplies the well, requiring the department to
stop using this 5 MGD source in an area which •
has high demand and a growing need for fire •
protection. The level of(PCE) was below drinking •
water standards. However, in 1992 the
department installed an air stripping system (1 •
MGD as a pilot treatment system) to reduce the •
load of(PCE). It worked and now the
department wants to treat the total well •
capacity. Also, by pumping this well we may •
be able to.stop the spread of the contaminate to •
other wells. Payback would be about a four-year
period. Failure to treat this source could mean •
the loss of a 5 MGD source. •
• Three wells at various locations in the County- •
These will secure our water right filings and need to $3,000,000 •
be completed before the rights elapse.
•
•
•
Page4of7
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Installing variable speed drives on existing wells- $761,000
• This will make the existing well more efficient.
• • City Creek Well-A new well is proposed at this $1,200,000
• location. The city has water rights for a well at
this location and construction will preserve that
4110 water right. To maintain the city's water
• rights a new well must soon be under
• construction. The State Engineer has stopped
granting extensions of time due to over pumping
• of the east side aquifers (State Engineer 1991 Salt
• Lake Valley Interim Ground-Water Management Plan).
• • 600 East Well-A new well is proposed at this
location. The city has water rights for a well at $1,000,000
• this location and construction will preserve that
water right. To maintain the city's water
• rights a new well must soon be under
construction. The State Engineer has stopped
• granting extensions of time due to over pumping
• of the east side aquifers (State Engineer 1991 Salt
IDLake Valley Interim Ground-Water Management Plan).
• $500,000
•
• Upgrade existing buildings at well sites.
• Storage • Continue to maintain and protect our exiting raw $125,000
Reservoirs water storage reservoirs in Big and Little Cottonwood
• •
canyons.
ID
• Distribution • Military Reservoir-Repair the roof&walls of the $3,000,000
• Reservoirs existing reservoir. This reservoir does not meet
•
seismic safety standards.
110 • 1300 East 100 South (1900 - Cover, 1955) - $5,000,000
. Complete demolition of the existing reservoir and
. reconstruct a new reservoir on this site. This
reservoir structure does not meet seismic
110 standards. An independent structural engineer
. recommends demolition and complete
. replacement of the reservoir.
110 • 4500 South 2700 East-Construct a new reservoir $5,000,000
on this site. A new reservoir would provide
additional fire protection and pressure to the east
side of Salt Lake County. The city purchased the
. property in 1977 for this reservoir.
Page 5 of 7
•
•
•
• High Zone Reservoir-Construct a new"high"zone $5,000,000 •
reservoir in the southeast portion of our distribution
area. •
• Pleasant Valley Reservoir-Demolish this reservoir. •
It is located in City Creek Canyon down stream from $700,000
the Treatment plant. It was originally constructed in •
19_but has not been used since 19_. It is not •
needed for operation of the distribution system and is •
in poor seismic condition.
• Other Miscellaneous repairs. $1,464,000 •
•
•
•
• Waterline Replacement program-Continue the •
Water Mains program of replacing old waterlines. Over the last five $25,300,000
•
years we have been spending approximately$1.3
million to replace water mains in our distribution •
system. This represents a replacement rate of •
about 0.6 percent per year or an average •
waterline life of 167 years. This will be increased
to about $3 million representing about 1.2 •
percent replacement per year or an average life of
•
83 years. •
• Valve and Hydrant Replacement - Replace •
valves and hydrants for a total of$200,000 per $3,600,000 •
year. This would allow us to continue our existing
program of upgrading over 8,416 fire hydrants w
and 14,876 valves. Failure to upgrade would •
cause loss of fire protection and cause service •
interruptions.
$3,400,000 •
• Lower Parleys Conduit (1892) - Renovate and •
install additional access to a 36" brick line from •
Suicide Rock to the city. This line was
abandoned in 1985 because of its deteriorated •
condition. It's now needed to handle the •
additional flows from the expanded Parley's
Treatment Plant (45MGD). The line, where the •
top has decayed and crumbled, causes sink •
holes along its route. Part of the renovation will ,
include installation of additional maintenance
access manway. Failure to renovate line could •
cause sinkholes to appear creating major loss to •
private homes and garages that were built over •
the line.
Page 6 of 7 •
IP
11/ • Fire Protection - Upgrade of existing four-inch $14,000,000
. water lines to eight inch or higher to provide
better fire protection.
• Major Supply Lines -Install major supply lines $23,140,000
. listed in the 1997 Water Master Plan. Construct
new supply lines on 5600 West, 2200 West,
• 1300 East from 4500 South to 6400 South,
• 2700 South from 13th east to Park Reservoir,
. and Artesian Basin line on 3300 South.
• • Contributions by Developers -Anticipated $4,500,000
lines, which will be constructed by developers
over the next ten years.
1110
110 • Community & Economic Development $2,794,012
. Projects - Lines, which will be required to be
replaced due to CED projects within the City
ID limits.
110 Water • Service replacement program-We have a regular $12,300,000
. Services program to replace old galvanized services lines with
new copper pipe. Galvanized services only last about
20 years and many of them are beginning to fail.
. • Water meter replacement-We in the middle of a $2,600,000
. five-year meter replacement program. Water meters
nave a useful life of 13 to 15 years. Most of our
. water meters wore installed during 1980 through
. 1988 requiring replacement during 1995-2003.
We are currently behind in this program and
failure to replace meters on a consistent basis
means loss of revenue for both the Water and
. Sewer Utility. The Server Utility will fund 33% of
this program within the city service area.
• Large &small meter replacement-We have a
continual program to replace old small and large $6,600,000
meters as they wear out.
Landscaping • Water Conservation Programs-To promote water
111 conservation and to show customers alternatives $460,000
related to landscaping the department plans to
upgrade the landscape at different department sites
over the next ten years.
$200,000,000
Total Capital Improvement Program 2003-2012 (rounded)
Page 7 of 7
•
•
•
•
•
• Sewer Fund
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
IP
SEWER UTILITY
• ENTERPRISE FUND
• BUDGET SUMMARY
• FY 2004-06
• AMENDED PROJECTED PROPOSED FORECAST FORECAST
ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
1111 SOURCES 2001-2002 2002-03 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
• REVENUES
11111
METERED SALES $13,988,645 $14,824,000 $14,324,000 $15,613,160 $17,018,344 $18,209,629
• INTEREST INCOME 498,432 800,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
• OTHER REVENUES 270,562 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000
• TOTAL REVENUES 14,757,639 16,006,000 15,156,000 16,445,160 17,850,344 19,041,629
• OTHER SOURCES
41110 IMPACT FEES 758,657 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000
• GRANTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUES 440,973 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER SOURCES 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000
• BOND PROCEEDS 0 25,000,000 0 25,000,000 0 0
0 TOTAL OTHER SOURCES 1,199,630 26,110,000 1,110,000 26,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000
• TOTAL SOURCES $15,957,269 $42,116,000 $16,266,000 $42,555,160 $18,960,344 $20,151,629
0 EXPENSES&OTHER USES
III ,
EXPENDITURES
11111
111
• PERSONAL SERVICES $5,152,123 $5,502,235 $5,502,236 $5,675,520 $5,839,579 $6,007,884
. OPERATING&MAINTENANCE 1,103,657 1,343,620 1,343,620 1,320,352 1,345,012 1,368,650
TRAVEL&TRAINING 11,432 48,920 48,920 48,920 49,206 50,645
UTILITIES 607,399 690,575 690,575 721,860 772,236 800,290
PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 1,051,899 1,073,995 1,073,995 1,107,115 1,124,925 1,142,235
DATA PROCESSING 134,256 114,300 114,300 140,000 144,200 148,526
FLEET MAINTENANCE 211,399 265,280 265,280 270,719 278,203 287,022
. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 131,609 152,250 152,250 '155,000 159,650 164,440
PAYMENT IN LEIU OF TAXES 114,091 129,375 129,375 284,110 309,680 337,551
OTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES (395,911) (89,793) (89,794) (123,8961 41,018 54,805
110 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,121,954 9,230,757 9,230,757 9,599,700 10,063,709 10,362,048
• OTHER USES "
O
CAPITAL OUTLAY 919,193 1,308,800 1,110,800 959,500 798,500 745,600
IP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 6,691,664 35,129,557 8,995,725 . 33,793,500 3,765,000 14,960,000
ID DEBT SERVICES 449,981 1,525,000 525,000 2,780,000 2,775,000 2,285,000
. TOT A L OTHER USES 8,060,838 37,963,357 10,631,525 37,533,000 7,338,500 17,990,600
TOTAL USES $16,182,792 $47,194,114 $19,862,282 $47,132,700 $17,402,209 $28,352,648
ID EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER
SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES ($225,523) ($5,078,114) ($3,596,282) ($4,577,540) $1,558,135 ($8,201,019)
OPERATING CASH BALANCES
. BEGINNING JULY 1 17,003,960 16,778,437 16,778,437 13,182,155 8,604,615 10,162,750
ENDING JUNE 30 16,778,437 11,700,323 13,182,155 8,604,615 10,162,750 1,961,731
0
Cash Reserve Ratio(Acceptable range(10%to. 200 143% 90% 101% 19%
Operating cash balance is defined as total cash less restricted amounts for
bond covenants and outstanding accounts payable.
SEWER UTILITY
CASH FLOW
ACTUAL ACTUAL CURRENT BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
YEAR YEAR BUDGET YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
2000-2001 2061-2002-- 2002-2003 -2003-2004- -20041-2005- 5 200 -- -2006 2007 -2007=2 08 2008-2003
SEWER SALES 11,569,342 13,988,645 14,324,000 15,613,160 17,018,344 18,209,629 18,391,725 18,575,642 18,761,398
OTHER INCOME 569,449 270,562 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000 382,000
INTEREST INCOME 694,634 498,432 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
OPERATING INCOME 12,833,425 14,757,639 15,156,000 16,445,160 17,850,344 19,041,629 19,223,725 19,407,642 19,593,398
OPERATING EXPENSES (8,494,179) (8,121,954) (9,230,757) (9,599,700) (10,063,709) (10,362,048) (10,677,404) (11,149,757) (11,344,410)
NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. __ 4,339,246 6,635,685 _ 5,925,243 6,845,460 7,786,635 8,679,581 8,546,321 8,257,885 8,248,988
IMPACT FEES 788,638 758,657 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000
OTHER RECEIPTS/ BOND PROCEEDS _ 0 0 0 25,000,000 0 0 0 0 0
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,587,818 440,973 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY (757,328) (919,193) (1,110,800) (959,500) (798,500) (745,600) (974,800) (1,129,700) (900,500)
DEBT SERVICE (557,981) (449,981) (525,000) (530,000) (525,000) (35,000) (35,000) (35,000) (35,000)
DEBT SERVICE (NEW) _ 0 0 0 (2,250,000) (2,250,000) (2,250,000) (2,250,000) (2,250,000) (2,250,000)
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE _ 1,061,147 (169,544) (525,800) 22,370,500 (2,463,500) (1,920,600) (2,149,800) (2,304,700) (2,075,500)
AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL 5,400,393 6,466,141 5,399,443 29,215,960 5,323,135 8,758,981 6,396,521 5,953,185 6,173,488
" 1 . I I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ,(4,143,352) (6,891,664) ' (8,995,725) (33,793,500) (3,765,000) (14,960,000) (7,170,000) (5,511,000) I (5,315,000)
CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 1,257,041 (225,523) (3,596,282) (4,577,540) 1,558,135 (8,201,019) (773,479) 442,185 858,488
BEGINING CASH BALANCE 15,746,919 17,003,960 16,778,437 13,182,155 8,604,615 10,162,750 1,961,730 1,188,251 1,630,436
CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 1,257,041 (225,523) (3,596,282) (4,577,540) 1,558,135 (8,201,019) (773,479) 442,185 858,488
ENDING BALANCES 17,003,960 16,778,437 13,182,155 8,604;615 10,162,750 1,961,730 1,188,251 1,630,436 2,488,925
SEWER DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE _ 7.78 14.75 11.29 2.46 2.81 3.80 3.74 3.61 3.61
RATE CHANGE 12.50% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 9.00% 7.00% 0.00%- 0.00% 0.00%
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL SEWER --
0
BILL (1990476.80) 86.40 94.18 102.65 111.89 121.96 130.50 130.50 130.50 130.50
Ratio --9 ------------ 5 ---- --
Cash Reserve (acceptable range 10-20) 200$ 207$ 143$ 90% 101% 19% 1
11% 59s 22%
Impact Fee per ERU 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
Number of ERG connections 1,577 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200
Debt Service Coverage 7.78 14.75 11.29 2.46 2.81 3.80 3.74 3.61 3.61
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
lip • • • lip lip lip lip • • lip lip lip • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 411
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003.2004 2004.2005 2005.2008 20084007 2007-2008 2008-2009
11201 2720.10 MAINTENANCE&REPAIR SHOPS-WIP 52-11201-2772.10
10601 51212517 STORAGE BUILDING REPLACEMENT 133,675
11201 524905190 PLANT SECURITY SYSTEM 29,958 25,000 15,000 cs,coo is,000
12201 WEST BUILDING ROOFING 0 12,000
11201 524905204 ADMININSTATION EXTENSION 125,000
163,633 37,000 0 0 140,000 15,000 15,000
10101 2720 LIFT STATIONS-WIP 52-10101-2772.10
10101 NORTH COVE PUMP STATION-355 EAST CANYON OAKS WAY (NEW PUMPS AND CONTROL PANEL) 30,000
10101 FUEL FARM PUMP STATION-AIRPORT (COMPLETE UPGRADE) 400,000
10101 52490732 4000 WEST PUMP STATION(S&L)-OBSERVATION DECK (NEW PUMPS IN SMITH AND LOVELESS STATION) 50,000
10101 BONNEVILLE PUMP STATION-2350 EAST SHIRECLIFF _ 15,000 _
10101 INDUSTRIAL ROAD PUMP STATION-1850 WEST INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE (COMPLETE UPGRADE) 300,000
10101 PUMP STATION AT AIRPORT GATE#1-AIRPORT (PUMPS AND CONTROL PANEL) 30,000
10101 6TH NORTH PUMP STATION-600 NORTH 4800 WEST ioo,co0
10101 PUMP REPLACEMENT 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
10101 52490737 4700 WEST SEWER LIFT STATIONS UPGRADE 63,283
10101 524907740 CONCORD LIFT STATION 1,239 _
524907743 ANDREWS LIFT STATION AWNING 4,000
52490738 LIFT STATION STUDY VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY
148,522 450,000 115,000 350,000 80,000 150,000 50,000
11201 2720.30 TREATMENT PLANTS•WIP 52-10401-2772.10
11201 524905164 ODOR CONTROL 100,000 50.0,000
11201 49-0-5-111 PRETREATMENT ELECTRICAL 200,000
11201 SEISMIC UPGRADE 100,000 100,000 1.00,000
11201 524905203 SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION 22,000,000
11201 T/F INLET/OUTLET CHANNELS 500,000
11201 T/FCENTERCOLUMNMODIFICATION 60,000 50,000 so,000 so,000
11201 524905188 NEW FORCE MAIN BETWEEN PRETREATMENT AND TREATMENT PLANT 2,000,000 1,000,000
11201 CLARIFIER REBUILD 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
11201 CARBON REGENERATION 300,000 200,000 200,000
11201 PRIMARY CLAIRIFIER 1,750,000
11201 524905187 COGEN REHAB 1,000,000 2,800,000
11201 COGEN-3RD ENGINE _ _ _ 800,000
11201 524905197 ELECTRIC GATE ACTUATOR 50,000 50,000 so,000
11201 524905195 T.F.VFD STRUCTURE-T.F.PUMP STATION VFD/EXT. 40,205
11201 SECONDARY LINE REPLACEMENT 50,000 50,000 50,000
11201 GRIT CHAMBER EXT. 200,000
11201 MECHANICAL DEWATERING OR REUSE PROGRAM 3,000,000
11201 524905184 ALTERNATIVE DISINFECTION SYSTEM AND C12 CONTACT EXPANSION 2,600,000
11201 OIL DRAIN ALTERNATIVE 2,000,000
11201 524905177 COGENERATION SYSTEM EVALUATION 385,000
11201 513504789 1365 WEST 2300 NORTH WATER RECLAMATION PLANT 90,316
11201 THICKENER REBUILD 30,000
11201 524905149 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM 27,875
3753,396 29,180,0001 85,000 3,185,0001 585,000 2,985,000 2,935,000
mml
10401 2730 COLLECTION LINES•WIP 5210401-2773.10
,SPECIAL PROJECTS&CED
1 OF 9
I7Excebbuoget200l\cashflowl CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL •
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2006 2005-2008 2008-2007 2007.2008 2008-2009
525001666 LIGHT RAIL-EAST WEST 821 27,116
10401 525001701 500 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO 400 SOUTH WEST SIDE (CED NO.103009) 1,600 7,529 10401 525001707 GLADIOLA STREET(2900 W)-500 SOUTH TO 1820 SOUTH(PN 103007) 10,032 250,000 -
12,453 34,645 0 250,000 0 0, 0, 0
OTHER PROJECTS -_-
10401 EMERGENCIES-MISC.LOCATIONS 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 _ 100,000 100,000 100,000
10401 MISC.PUBLIC SERVICE PROJECTS 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPERS 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
800,000 800,000 800,000 800,0001 800,000ll 800,001 800,00q
REPLACE VARIOUS COLLECTION LINES --- -__-_
10401 525001662 1300 WEST 300 NORTH TO THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT APPROX. 6 -- --------
10401 525001703 400 WEST 200 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH(EASTSIDE&WESTSIDE) 97 10401 525001704 500 WEST NORTH TEMPLE TO 200 SOUTH(EASTSIDE) `- 97 -- ---- ---------- -._
10401 525001705 500 WEST 200 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH (EASTSIDE)B STEWART 5,928 -" -
10401 525001707 GLADIOLA STREET BETWEEN 500 SOUTH AND 1300 SOUTH - 7,232 -______ _L_
10401 525001731 300 WEST-400 SOUTH TO 410 SOUTH (CIPP) 90 34 -
10401 525001737 1700 EAST-1015 SOUTH TO 1036 SOUTH (CIPP) 174 985 - -
10401 525001739 300 SOUTH-1000 WEST TO GOSHEN STREET(1040 W) (CIPP) - -- ---- 1
302 1,155
10401 525001743 INDIAN HILLS DRIVE-1510 SOUTH TO 1560 SOUTH 18 - - --180 1,054
10401 525001745 SIR PATRICK DRIVE-575 NORTH TO 600 NORTH 225 1,12110401 525001759 4700 WEST NORTH TEMPLE TO 700 SOUTH 400,000 - ---
10401 525001770 SOUTH TEMPLE"F"STREET TO 650 EAST 24
10401 525001772 SOUTH TEMPLE-150 EAST TO APPROX.220 EAST(NORTH SIDE 18"MAIN) 525 18,548 - - - -'--- -
1 10401 525001773 SOUTH TEMPLE "H"TO"I"STREET NORTH SIDE-12'CIPP 211 9,000
10401 525001774 SOUTH TEMPLE-1150 EAST TO 1200 EAST(SOUTH SIDE 8"CIPP) - - -------------- --_______--_
_ 600 80,000_
10401 525001776 SOUTH TEMPLE-500 EAST TO 550 EAST(SOUTH SIDIE-8"MAIN) 445 80,000 - --- --- - -- ----- ---------
10401 525001777 SOUTH TEMPLE-850 EAST TO 950 EAST(SOUTH SIDE-8"MAIN) 800 985
10401 525001784 500 SOUTH-1470 EAST TO 1480 EAST 138 34
10401 525001786 MADISON ESTATES 1620 WEST CALIFORNIA AVENUE 189
10401 525001791 5300 WEST-1-80 TO 5350 WEST (DIG AND REPLACE 21") 330 15810401 525001797 600 WEST-500 SOUTH TO 200 SOUTH 2,400 224,049
10401 525001814 EASEMENT BETWEEN NAVAJO ST AND 1300 WEST-1100 SOUTH TO MEAD(ABUTT WITH GLENDALE CIRCLE PROJECT) 956 4,152 -
10401 525001815 EASEMENT BETWEEN 1300 WEST AND GLENDALE DRIVE-ILLINOIS AVENUE TO LEXINGTON AVENUE 710 7,267 - - -
10401 525001816 EASEMENT BETWEEN 1300 WEST AND CONCORD STREET-LEXINGTON AVENUE TO MEAD AVENUE 1,815 7,267 - -'
10401 525001817 EASEMENT BETWEEN CONCORD STREET AND 1200 WEST-LEXINGTON AVENUE TO MEAD AVENUE 1,9 - --
0 7,267
1,910 7,268
10401 525001818 EASEMENT BETWEEN 1200 WEST AND EMERY STREET-MEAD AVENUE TO LEXINGTON AVENUE ------ -- -- -- -- ---------
10401 525001819 EASEMENT 1400 SOUTH-1100 WEST TO EMERY STREET 340 7,268 -""- ------- -- - -----
10401 525001820 EASEMENT SOUTH OF 1300 SOUTH GLENDALE STREET TO JORDAN RIVER 250 7,52010401 525001823 900 EAST-500 SOUTH TO 600 SOUTH(EASTSIDE) _ 720 18,547 -- -
10401 525001825 SOUTH TEMPLE-1250 EAST TO VIRGINIA STREET(1345 E 8"CIPP) 766 25,000 - - --
10401 525001828 700 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE 110
10401 525001829 1700 EAST-1262 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH 180 18,710 --
10401 525001830 1700 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO 1300 EAST 1,621 18,752 - -
10401 525001831 LAIRD AVENUE(1210 SOUTH)-1376 EAST TO 1480 EAST 554 18,683 -'
10401 525001833 NORTH TEMPLE-850 WEST TO 900 WEST(NORTHSIDE) 372 18,616
10401 525001834 NORTH TEMPLE-1030 WST TO 1060 WEST(SOUTHSIDE) 400 18,708 -- -
10401 525001836 EASEMENT BETWEEN SOUTH SANDRUN RD AND NORTH SANDRUN RD-DORCHESTER DR TO EAST CAPITAL BLVD 366 18,616_10401 525001837 1400 WEST-400 SOUTH TO 450 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) 665 125,000 - -
2 OF 9
I:\Excetbudget2001leasMbwl CIP FILESCIPCashflow2004.xts
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
'• • • • • • • • • • •
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YRI
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005.2008 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
10401 525001838 400 SOUTH-400 WEST TO 450 WEST(SOUTH SIDE 8") 790 33,548
10401 525001839 500 WEST-300 SOUTH TO 350 SOUTH(WEST SIDE 10"CIPP) 350 72,100
10401 525001839 500 WEST-200 SOUTH TO 300 SOUTH(500 WEST RECON) 50,000
10401 525001840 501 WEST-300 SOUTH TO 400 SOUTH(500 WEST RECON) 100,000 --
10401 525001842 BLAINE AVENUE(1735 SOUTH)-1400 EAST TO 1430 EAST (DIG AND REPLACE) 813 30,000
10401 525001843 KENNEDY DRIVE(965 SOUTH)-3110 EAST TO 3190 EAST-(DIG AND REPLACE) 600 18,000
10401 525001844 MICHIGAN AVENUE(990 SOUTH)-1700 EAST TO 2000 EAST 2,393 80,000
10401 525001845 PRINCETON AVENUE(1135 S)-1800 EAST TO 1895 EAST 737 20,000 -10401 525001846 PRINCETON AVENUE(1135 S)-1330 EAST TO 1419 EAST(CIPP)/LAIRD AVENUE()-1300 EAST TO 1330 EAST (CIPP) 1,230 57,000
10401 525001847 YALE AVENUE(1080 SOUTH)-1300 EAST TO 1380 EAST 730 51,000 -
10401 525001848 YALECREST AVENUE(1015 SOUTH)-1900 EAST TO 2000 EAST 856 28,000 10401 525001849 YALECREST AVENUE(1015 SOUTH)-1788 EAST TO 1900 EAST 787 49,000 -10401 525001850 300 NORTH-800 WEST TO 850 WEST(DIG AND REPLACE) 600 47,000
10401 525001855 HARRISON AVENUE(1370 SOUTH)-1500 EAST TO 1700 EAST 1,800 45,000 _
10401 525001856 SHERMAN AVENUE(1340 SOUTH)-1540 EAST TO 1570 EAST AND WESTMORELAND DRIVE 423 13,000
10401 525001863 600 NORTH-1300 WEST TO 1340 WEST(SOUTH SIDE) 600 79,000 - -10401 525001867 MAIN STREET(EAST AND WEST SIDE)-900 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH (CIPP) 5,520 210,000 -10401 525001868 EASEMENT BETWEEN 1300 SOUTH AND ROXBURY ROAD (BONNEVILLE GC) 135,000 -10401 525001869 EASEMENT BETWEEN KING STREET AND WYOMING STREET 30,034 10401 525001870 EASEMENT EAST OF SCENIC DRIVE BELAIRE TO LAKELINE 10,000 - -
10401 525001879 FULLER AVENUE(450 S)-1000 EAST AND 1100 EAST 580 38,000 10401 525001880 300 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) 750 18,548
10401 525001884 EASEMENT APPROXIMATELY 1200 EAST 1,483 42,000
10401 525001885 EASEMENT APPROXIMATELY 2500 EAST 341 15,000
10401 525001889 2100 SOUTH 1480 EAST TO 1700 EAST (CIPP) 70,000
10401 525001891 ELIZABETH STREET 504 -` --
10401 525001892 900 EAST 400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) 18,548
10401 525001902 1700 EAST 1300 SOUTH 68 10401 525001906 BONNEVILLE OFF SITE SEWER 32
10401 525001907 500 SOUTH 1025 WEST TO 1059 WEST 76
10401 525001908 1400 WEST-1000 NORTH TO GOODWIN AVENUE(1135 N) (CIPP) 1,235 230,000
10401 525001909 SOUTH TEMPLE 550 EAST TO 700 EAST 170,000 ---
10401 525001914 WASHINGTON STREET(240 W)-900 SOUTH TO 950 SOUTH (10"CIPP) 600 9,000 - -'
10401 525001915 CATHERINE STREET(1440 W)-GOODWN AVENUE(1135 N)TO DUPONT AVENUE(1335 W) (CIPP) 1,373 45,000
10401 525001920 "F"STREET-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 3RD AVENUE (CIPP) 1,213 50,000
10401 525001922 THORNTON AVENUE(1040 S)-1300 EAST TO 1400 EAST AND 1340 EAST-GILMER DRIVE(905 S)TO THORNTON AVENUE(10 998 31,00010401 525001936 600 WEST-400 TO 500 NORTH (12"CIPP) 666 22,000 -
10401 525001947 400 WEST-VAN BUREN AVENUE(1550 S)TO 1700 SOUTH 998 85,000
10401 525001948 WEST TEMPLE-900 SOUTH TO MEAD AVENUE(10"&12"CIPP) 2,000 65,000 -10401 525001949 SOUTH TEMPLE MAIN STREET TO VIRGINIA STREET 302,835 -10401 525001955 EASEMENT(1800 SOUTH)WASATCH DRIVE TO MOHAWK WAY(2655 E) 530 20,000 - - -
10401 525001956 EASEMENT BLAINE AVENUE TO 1750 SOUTH THEN WEST TO WASATCH DRIVE 465 20,000
10401 525001963 2100 SOUTH-2300 EAST TO 2600 EAST CIPP
95,000
10401 525001970 GLENMARE STREET HARRISON AVE TO SHERMAN 414 13,000 --
10401 525001971 FILLMORE STREET HARRISON AVE TO SHERMAN 414 13,000
10401 EASEMENT AT 2450 E PARLEY'S WAY 842 24,000
10401 2100 South 1500 to 1700 East 12"CIPP 1,742 66,000 -
10401 M STREET-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 1 ST AVE CIPP
10401 L STREET-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 1 ST AVE CIPP 12,000 - -
10401 VIRGINIA REET SOUTH TEMPLE CIPP 14,000 - -
10401 900 SOUTH-600 WEST TO 700 WEST D&R 16,000
140,000 - --- ----
TOTAL 50,161 3,892,739
3 OF 9
I:\Excehbudget2001\cashfow\CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004.2005 2005.2006 2006.2007 2007.2008 2008.2009
10401 525001854 300 SOUTH-900 EAST TO 1000 EAST 714 75,000
10401 525001857 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE(840 S)-1950 EAST TO 1992 EAST 630 30,000'
10401 525001858 SUNNYSIDE AVENUE(840 S)-1510 EAST TO 1600 EAST 670 35,000
10401 525001859 1800 EAST-1300 SOUTH 1400 SOUTH 708 30,000
10401 525001860 EMIGRATION STREET(1730 EAST)-1300 SOUTH TO HARRISON AVENUE AND EMIGRATION CIRCLE 1,000 45,000
10401 525001861 HUBBARD AVENUE(935 SOUTH)-1850 EAST TO 2000 EAST 562 65,000
10401 525001882 1100 EAST-700 SOUTH TO 800 SOUTH (CIPP) _ 884 45,000
10401 525001923 DIESTEL ROAD(1730 E)-930 SOUTH TO GREENWOOD TERRACE (CIPP) 659 28,000 -
10401 525001928 WEST TEMPLE AND 600 SOUTH 80 32,000
10401 525001929 SOUTH TIEMPLE-400 EAST TO 450 EAST(SOUTH SIDE)(CIPP) 600 34,000 -
10401 525001930 800 EAST-BROWNING AVENUE(1400 S) INTERSECTION(D&R) 600 184,000 - -+ -
10401 525001931 KING STREET(2430 E)-2222 SOUTH TO 2250 SOUTH (CIPP) 600 34,000
10401 525001932 REGENT STREET(40 E)-100 SOUTH TO 200 SOUTH(800'CIPP&50'D&R) 850 50,000 __
10401 525001933 830 SOUTH-1134 WEST TO 1200 WEST(CIRCLE) (D&R) 600 120,000 -1
10401 525001933 830 NORTH-1134 WEST TO 1200 WEST(CIRCLE) (CIPP)(D&R) 360 42,000
10401 51934 NORTH CENTER STREET-1134 WEST TO 1200 WEST (D&R) 600 120,000
10401 525001936 600 WEST-400 NORTH TO 450 NORTH (CIPP) 600 55,000 y
10401 525001937 MARKEA COURT(250 S)-656 EAST TO 700 EAST (CIPP) 600 35,000 --
10401 525001938 300 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO ELIZABETH STREET(1140 E) (CIPP) 600 26,500
_ 10401 j 525001939 300 SOUTH-UNIVERSITY STREET TO 1300 EAST(CIPP) 380 20,000_
10401 525001940 200 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST(NORTH SIDE)AND 1100 EAST TO 1180 EAST(SOUTH SIDE) (CIPP) 1,250 52,000 T
10401 525001941 400 SOUTH-1000 EAST TO 1100 EAST(NORTH SIDE-EAST OF LIGHT RAIL) (CIPP) 875 35,000
10401 525001941 400 SOUTH-boo EAST TO 1100 EAST (SOUTH SIDE-EAST OF LIGHT RAIL) (CIPP) 665 25,000
10401 525001942 1600 SOUTH-300 WEST TO 400 WEST(CENTER) (CIPP) _ 475 19,000
10401 525001943 STATE STREET-100 SOUTH TO 200 SOUTH(EAST AND WEST SIDE) (CIPP) 1,470 75,000
10401 525001943 STATE STREET-200 SOUTH TO 300 SOUTH(EAST AND WEST SIDE) (CIPP) 1,461 75,000
10401 525001943 STATE STREET 300 SOUTH TO (EAST 400 SOUTH AND WEST SIDE) (CIPP) 1,615 85,000 --
10401 525001943 STATE STREET-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) (CIPP) 734 40,000
10401 525001944 400 WEST-100 NORTH TO SOUTH TEMPLE (CIPP AND D&R) 893 80,000 _
10401 525001944 400 WEST-SOUTH TEMPLE TO 100 SOUTH (CIPP AND D&R) 810 80,000
10401 525001945 EDITH AVENUE(1200 S)-400 EAST TO 442 EAST (CIPP) 600 24,000
10401 525001948 WEST TEMPLE-1300 SOUTH TO MEAD AVENUE(980 S) (CIPP) 2,000 150,000
10401 525001957 HAMPTON AVENUE(1135 S)-300 EAST TO 345 EAST (CIPP) 410 21,000
------ -------- - --- ---------
10401
-- ---,
525001975 900 SOUTH-600 WEST TO 700 WEST D&R 900 300,000
10401 525001976 BROADMOORE STREET-1910 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH (8"CIPP) 1,100 40,000 _
10401 525001977 2100 SOUTH-2300 EAST TO 2600 EAST (8"CIPP) 2,750 95,000
10401 525001978 2100 SOUTH-WASATCH DRIVE TO LAKELINE(8"CIPP) 3,040 110,000
10401 525001979 ARLINGTON DRIVE-1330 EAST TO FAIRFAX ROAD (8"CIPP) 930 35,000 _
10401 525001980 VIRGINIA STREET SOUTH TEMPLETO#50 NORTH(DO WITH SO TEMPLE RE-CONST 0 TION) 160 32,000 ------ ----- --- -- ---------- -- ----
10401 525001981 HERBERT AVENUE-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST CIPP 815 33,000 -10401 525001982 1200 EAST YALE TO 900 SOUTH P 1,100 40,000^ -10401 525001983 GILMER DRIVE-1100 EAST TO 1250 EAST (8"CIPP) 1,900 65,000 10401 525001984 MICHIGAN AVENUE-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST (8"CIPP) 775 32,000
10401 525001985 MCCLELLAND STREET-HARVARD AVENUE TO BELMONT AVENUE (8"CIPP) 1,190 43,00010401 -
__ - - -
525001986 YALE AVENUE-MCCLELLAND AVENUE TO 910 EAST _ 845 35,000
10401 525001987 McCELLAND ST HARVARD TO BELMONT CIPP _ 1,200 45,000 -----`--- -`-------- -- --
10401 525001988 EASEMENT UTAHNA DR TO CALIFORNIA(1150 W) CIPP 405 15,000 - -- '---------- ----
10401 525001989 1365 SOUTH EMERY ST TO UTAHNA 0WCIPP 200 10,000 -
10401 525001990 STATE-STREET EAST AND WEST SIDE 100 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(5020 LF 8"CIPP 263 LF 10"CIPP) 5,283 198,000 ---
10401 525001991 COMMONWEALTH AVENE-HYLAND HILLS ROAD TO WASATCH DRIVE (8"CIPP) 1,500 60,000 _ _10401 525001992 TEXAS STREET-2100 SOUTH TO PARLEYS WAY (8"CIPP) 928 36,000
10401 525001993 SCENIC DRIVE-1950 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH (8"CIPP) 925 36,000
10401 525001994 SCENIC DRIVE-2100 SOUTH TO 2182 SOUTH CIPP _ 1,050 40,000
10401 525001995 REGENT STREET(40 E)-100 SOUTH TO 200 SOUTH 800'CIPP 850 35,000
4 OF 9
I:\Excebbudget2001\cashflow\CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
lop lop • • • • lop imp • • lip • • • quip • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1! • • • • • • • • ill, ill, ill, • i
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003.2004 2004.2006 2006.2008 2008.2007 2007.2008 2008-2009
10401 525001996 EASEMENT 2500 SOUTH BELAIRE DRIVE TO LAKELINE DRIVE CIPP 350 15,000
10401 525001997 EASEMENT(BRADSHAW CIRCLE)-FOOTHILL DRIVE TO END OF CIRCLE(8"CIPP) 410 15,000
10401 525001998 EASEMENT APPROX.1200 EAST-1100 AVENUE TO CHANDLER DRIVE 8"CIPP 1,000 35,000
10401 525001999 EASEMENT(BETWEEN WYOMING STREET AND KING STREET)2100 SOUTH TO PARLEYS WAY 850 _ 35,000 _
56,011 3,301,500 ----- ---
10401 525002000 EASEMENT 1300 SOUTH-ROXBURY ROAD NORTH TO BONNEVILLE DRIVE (8"AND 10"CIPP) . 3,550 135,000
10401 525002001 EASEMENT(NORTH OF OQUIRRH DRIVE)-BONNEVILLE DRIVE TO VISTA VIEW DRIVE (CIPP) 2,300 80,000
10401 525002002 EASEMENT MERCEDES WAY-OAKHURST DRIVE TO CRESTVIEW DRIVE (8"CIPP) 577 25,000
10401 525002003 HERBERT AVENUE-200 EAST TO 300 EAST (8"CIPP) 750 30,000
10401 525002004 EASEMENT(LYNWOOD DRIVE TO BRENTWOOD CIRCLE) 750 26,000
10401 525002005 400 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO 200 SOUTH(EAST SIDE) (8"CIPP AND 100 LF 8"D&R) 1,700 110,000
10401 525002006 200 SOUTH 400 WEST-NE CORNER TO SE CORNER (8"D&R) 87 40,000
10401 525002007 PARLEYS WAY(NORTH SIDE)2300 TO STRINGHAM AVE.(INCOM) TE VIDEO) 2,450 85,000
10401 525002008 PARLEYS WAY(SOUTH SIDE)2300 TO 2475 EAST 30 LF D&R 1,800 65,000 - --
10401 525002009 SCENIC DRIVE 2182 SO.TO 2275 SO D&R 50 LF AND 5'NEW MH 900 60,000 - ---- -
10401 525002010 EMERSON 400 TO 500 EAST 750 30,000 -- ---- - -
10401 525002011 STRINGHAM AVE PARLEYS WAY TO 2630 EAST 928 35,000
_ 10401 525002012 WYOMING ST 2100 SOUTH TO COMMONWEALTH AND ELM AVE TO PARLEYS WAY 788 30,000
10401' 525002013 300 NORTH CENTER ST TO QUINCE ST. 1,000 38,000
_ 10401 525002014 SOUTH TEMPLE MAIN STREET TO STATE STREET 18"CIPP 1,200 85,000
10401 525002015 EOl7TH TEMPLE MAIN STREET TO STATE ST 1,003 45,000
10401 525002016 DIESTEL ROAD(1730 E)-900 SOUTH TO FAIRVIEW AVENUE (8"CIPP) 1,100 43,000 10401 525002017 KING STREET(2430 E)-2100 SOUTH TO BERNADINE DRIVE (8"CIPP) 1,140 42,000
10401 525002018 ALLEY t 970 WEST 300 TO 400 SOUTH 780 LF 8"CIPP 780 30,000 A - - - - ---- --"
10401 525002019 LAIRD AVE 1700 TO 1800 EAST 800 32,000 - - -------
10401 525002020 600 WEST 300 TO 400 SOUTH 15"CIPP 710 - 40,000
10401 525002021 300 SOUTH-1000 EAST TO ELIZABETH EAST(NORTH SIDE) 1,120 45,000
10401 525002022 200 SOUTH-1100 EAST TO 1200 EAST(BOTH SIDES)CIPP 1,250 52,000
10401 525002023 400 SOUTH 1000 to 1210 EAST NORTH SIDE 8"CIPP 1,750 62,000 -
10401 525002024 400 U H 1000 TO 1200 EAST SOUTHSOOTH-8115€-TZT1515 1,430 55,000 -10401 525002025 STATE STREET SOUTH TEMPLE(SO.EAST MH) TO APPROX.#70 NORTH(ON EAS IDEfi6 ) 560 25,000
10401 525002026 STATE STREET SOUTH TEMPLE(NO.WEST MN) TO NORTH TEMPLE(ON WEST S-DI E) 800 35,000 -- '-10401 525002027 400 WEST-400 SOUTH TO 500 SOUTH(WEST SIDE) D&R 350 LF-CIPP 343 LF 700 120,000
88,884 1,500,000
10401 525002028 CRESTLINE CIRCLE-VIRGINIA STREET TO ELEVENTH AVENUE (8"CIPP) _ 750 _ 32,000
10401 52500202g 300 SOUTH UNIVERSITY STREET TO 1300 EAST (NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE) - 700 30,000
10401 525002030 2600 EAST FOOTHILL TZTITCOUTH 500 - 20,000 ------------
10401 525002031 1100 EAST 300 TO 400 SOUTH(CIPP)(WEST SIDE) 680 ----- 27,000 -- ----- ---
10401 525002032 1100 EAST 200 TO 300 SOUTH(EAST AND WEST SIDE) 1,400 50,000 -10401 525002033 PALE AV 1100 T 1300 EA 8"CIP 1,600 - 56,000 ---- ----
YALE AVE 1550 TO 1623 NEED MORE VIDEO IN AREA --
10401 525002034 575 30,000
10401 525002035 DONNER WAY 1015 S TO 940S 30 LF D&R 1,000 - 60,000
10401 525002036 ATKIN AVE.1900 TO 2000 TH EAST 70 LF D&R PLUS MANHOLE 800 LF 8"CIPP 800 - 55,000 --- ------'
10401 525002037 1800 EAST-1300 SOUTH 1400 SOUTH(CIPP) 708 30,000 - -'
10401 525002038 HUBBARD AVENUE(935 SOUTH)-1700 EAST TO 2000 EAST 8"CIPP 2,150 80,000
EASEMENT 1030 SOUTH 1300 1 38 AST 530 L 8"CI --- --- -26 0---- --- --------------
10401 525002039 530 25,000
10401 525002040 MICHIGAN AV .13 0 1400 A 8' IPP 2,100 80,000
10401 525002041 2300 EAS 2260 223 H R- 300 75,000
10401 525002042 YALECREST 1700 EAST TO 1505 EAST 1,50o 55,000
10401 525002043 830 SOUTH-1134 WEST TO 1200 WEST(CIRCLE) (D&R) 600 125,000
10401 525002044 HAMPTON AVENUE(1135 S)-300 EAST TO 400 EAST (CIPP) 746 31,000
10401 525002045 MARKEA COURT(250 S)-656 EAST TO 700 EAST (CIPP) 600 27,000
5 OF 9
I:\Excebbudget2001\cashtlow\CIP F ILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007.2008 2008-2009
10401 525002046 800 EAST BROWNING AVE INTERSECTION D&R 150 60,000
10401 525002047 MARKEA COURT 656 TO 700 EAST D&R AND CIPP 100 LF D&R(4'DEEP)250 LE 8"CIPP 250 24,000 -
10401 525002048 WILLIAMS AVE 300 TO 400 EAS NEE 10" -700 42,000 -----
10401 525002049 THORNTON AVE 132 O 1400 A "CI 825 32,000 -
10401 525002050 DOWNINGTON AVE 1300 EAST TO 1440 EAST 8"CIPP 1,050 -'-- ----- 40,000 -------------
10401 525002051 N TH EMPLE RANG TREET TO REDWOOD ROAD 1250 LF 15"CIPP 1,250 - ------65,000 --- "------------
10401 525002052 NORTH TEMPLE 2250 WEST TO 2242 WEST 10"CIPP 160 12,
-
000
10401 525002053 NORTH�'EMPLE ORANGE STREET TO WEST OF 2250 WEST 3,010 -
- 140,000
10401 525002054 EDITH AVENUE-400 EAST TO 500 EAST(8"CIPP) 750 32,000
10401 525002055 700 SOUTH700 TO 736 EAST CIPP 800 - ---- -_--------
_ 35,000 ---
10401 525002056 ALDEN AVE 2445 TO 2535 SO.(10"CIPP) 700 32,000 -------- ---
10401 525002057 FREEMONT AND REMINGTON AVE 700 TO 800 WEST 1,360 - 44,000
10401 525002058 STATE STREET 600 SOUTH TO 700 SOUTH(EAST AND WEST 8"AND 10"CIPP) - - 1,400 54,000
29,644 -- -- 1300,000 ---- ------
10401 525002059 STATE STREET(BOTH SIDES)500 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH 5150 LF 15"1550 12"2350 8"ALL CIPP 9,050 416,000
10401 525002060 EASEMENT 750 SOUTH STATE ST TO 200 EAST CIPP 580 - 20,000 -
10401 525002061 GREGORY PLACE 650 SO.STATE STREET AND EASEMENT EAST OF ST-FE STREET CIPP - 410 - --- - 15,000 -10401 525002062 WILLIAMS AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST 8"CIPP 700 - 30,000 - -'
10401 525002063 HERBERT AVE STATE-STREET TO 200 EAST -- 700 30,000
-
10401 525002064 YALE AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST 700 30,000 ---
10401 525002065 HARVARD AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST 700 - ---
_ 30,000 - -
10401 525002066 HAMPTON AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST -- 700
10401 525002067 KELSEY AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST - _____ _-____ 30,000
700 30,000 10401 525002068 EDITH AVE STATE STREET TO 200 EAST - 700 - -- --------------- ----- _, - ---- ------
_ 30,000
10401 525002069 STATE-STREET(EAST AND WEST SIDES)1300 SOUTH TO 1700 SOUTH 2300 LF 10"3660 LF 12" 5,960 --------------'--'-------- ---
210,000
10401 525002070 200 EAST 900 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH-1700 LF 12" 830 LF 8"350 LF 10"CIPP 3,000 - ----- --- - -- 110,000 - - -- -- ---
_ 4
10401 525002071 300 EAST 900 SOUTH TO 1300 SOUTH 850 LF 10" 600 LF 12" 560 LF 6"580 LF 15"CIPP 4,040 ----- -- ---- -------
0,000
10401 525002072 BELMONT AVE STATE STREET TO 300 EAST 15"CIPP 3,000 135,000
-- ------------ -------- ------ - ---------
10401 525002073 HUBBARD AVE 200 TO 300 EAST 750 29,000
-- - - -
10401 525002074 STATE STREET(EAST AND WEST SIDES)1700 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH 650 8"CIPP 4970 12"CIPP 5,620 215,000
37,310 ----- ----1,500,0 -- - ------------ -
1
,000
10401 525001946
400 SOUTH-400 WEST TO 500 WEST,500 WEST-400 SOUTH TO 430 SOUTH (CIPP) 900
36,000
VARIOUS 2,700 1,500,000 1,500,000
TOTAL 370,887 --------------- ------ ----
_' 3,892,7391 3,301,5001 1,500,00e 1,500,0004 1,500,004 1,536,001 1,500,000
DIVERSIONS
-------- ----- - ----- -
--- - - - -------- --
10401 WESTEST TEMPLE AND 600 SOUTH-(INSTALL NEW MANHOLE AND NEW PIPE DIAGONAL TO HELP FLOW) 30,000 -- -_-- - ----
MASTER PLAN PROJECTS -10401 525001662 1300 WEST BETWEEN 300 NORTH&WWTP (THOMPSON-HYSELL ENGINEERING) 9,850 __ 1,000,0.00 9,000,000
10401 NORTH TEMPLE DIVERSION FROM ORANGE STREET/1200 WEST/BECK STREET 4,000,000
9,850 30,000 0 1000,0001 9,000,000 4,000,000 0 0
TOTAL COLLECTION LINES 4,757,384 4,101,500 3,550,000 11,300,000 6,300,000 2,336,000 2,300,000
2730.20 LANDSCAPING-WIP 52-10401-2773.10 - --
11201 52907740 CONCORD LIFT STATION LANDSCAPING 22,000 -
6 OF 9
I:\Excellbudget2001\cashflow\CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
•
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YRI FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004.2006 2006-2006 2006.2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
11201 ASPHALTING 15,000 25,000 15,000 25,000 15,000 25,000 15,000
11201 PLANT PAINTING 90,000 100,000 50,000 _
11201 524905209 SLURRY SEAL PLANT 45,790
172,790 25,000 15,000 125,0001 65,000' 25,001 15,000
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 8,995,725 33,793,500 3,765,000 14,960,000 7,170,000 5,511,000 5,315,000
■ 2750.10 AUTOMOBILES&TRUCKS
-
10101 3/4 TON PICK UP 4X4 29,000 29,000
10101 1 TON PICKUP - -
10101 3/4 TON PICKUP 4X4 W/EXT CAB __ 31,000 31,000
10401 FULL SIZED TRUCK 48,000 24,000 24,000 62,000
10601 2 TON BOBTAIL DUMP 56,000
10601 3/4 4X4 PICKUP 52,000 56,000 58,000 60,000 60,000 30,000 60,000
11101 FORD 3/4 TON 4X4 25,000
11201 3/4 TON W/RACK 22,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,0001
11201 1 1/2 TON TRUCK W/FLATBED •
35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000
11201 S-10 PICKUP 15,000 20,000
11201 3/4 TON EXT.CAB W/SHELUSHELVING/LIGHTBAR 35,000 _ 35,000 35,000 35,000
11201 3/4 TON W/UTILITY BED 29,500 29,500 29,500
11201 1/2 TON W/RACK 22,000 22,000 22,000
12201 10 WHEEL DUMP(PUPS) 35,000 35,000 35,000 _
12201 10 WHEEL DUMP 100,000 100,000 too,000
10601 10 WHEEL DUMP 130,000
10601 21/2 TON W/CONTRACOTR BODY FOR CEMENT MIXER 80,000
248,500 265,000' 164,500. 314,0001 278,001 402,0001 265,500
2750.30 FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIP.10101 FORKLIFT 10,000 11,000 _
10101 RIDER MOWER 7,500 _ 90,000
10601 BACKHOE 80,000 80,000
10601 VACTOR TRUCK - -10601 HIGH PRESSURE TRUCK 155,000 155,000
10801 T V VAN •
135,000 155,000
11201 EZ GO 4X4 - -11201 2-GOLF CART REPLCAEMENTS 12,000_ 12_000 12,000
11201_LOADER REPLACEMENT 250,000 - - -
12201 BACKHOE/VACTOR-USED 6,500 6,500
12201 BROWN BEAR 250,000
10601 BACKHOE EXCHANGE _ 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 6,000 6,000
12201 CATCH BASIN TRUCK 200,000
335,000 268,500 254,000 22,500' 254,0001 280,5001 241,000
2760.20 TREATMENT PLANT EQUIPMENT 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
PIPELINE DATA COLLECTION 21,000
I - -
221,000 200,000 200,000 200,0001 200,0001 200,0001 200,00d
2760.30 TELEMETERING EQUIPMENT - - -
7 OF 9
I:\Excellbudget2001\cashf ow\CIP FILESCIPcashf ow2004.xls
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
11201 524905149 TELEMETERING UPGRADE-REPLACE 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000( 10,0001 10,000, 10,000
2760.50 OFFICE FURNITURE 8 EQUIPMENT 30,000 30,000 30,
000 30,000
11700 SOFTWARE
12201 OPERATION WORK AREA EQUIPMENT -- -- -_
11201 COPIER/MAINTENANCE -- - ___ ___10,000 10,000
11000
10401 RICOH LARGE FORMAT CONTROLLER
30,000 0' 41,000 10,0001 40,0001 01 30,00,
2760.90 OTHER NON-MOTIVE EQUIPMENT
10101 60 KW GENERATOR 25,000 26,000 28,000 28,000 28,000
10101 ONE TON SHOP CRANE
8,000
10101 UTILITY TRAILER 3,000 - -
10101 SAFETY TRIIPOD 5,000- - --
10101 8"PUMP ---- 0 3
_
- A00 -
10101 BUMPER CRANE 6,5000
_ 10101 DSCHARGE HOSE 8"
7,800
10401 COLOR LASER PRINTER 5,000 10601 TOWALONG COMPRESSOR 12,000 13,000 14,000
10601 SIDE DUMP CEMENT MIXERS 4,300 4,400 9,000 4,400
10601 4"PUMP TRAILER MOUNTED
00 -----------23,000 24,000 25,000
10601 HIGH PRESSURE HOSE ----___
18,000 18,000 20,400 37,200
10601 4'TRASH PUMP
11101 ICP/MS - - 26,000
11101 IC/FIAS SYSTEM 80,000
----------------- ------ --- ------------------
80,000 80,000
11101 TOC ANALYZER 80,000 _ 80,000
11101 TURBIMETER
10,000 - ------
11101 AIR HANDLING/ELECTRICAL -
25,000
11101 PH/ION ANALYZER OAION 20,000 20,000
11101 HYXANE EXTRACTION 7,000 - -
11101 15,000
(2)MIDI DISTILLATION APPARATUS 20,000 z0,000
11101 COLIFORM BATH INCUBATOR ------_
10,000 10,000___ 7.0,000
11101 TWO REFRIGERATORS -
16,000
16,000
11101 COD REACTOR --- - 9,000 -- -- - - - -- - - --`--
11101 SPECTROPHOTOMER
_ 10.000. - - - - lo,000
11101 INCUBATOR-HOT AIR 50,000 11201 MAINTENANCE STORAGE CABINETS - _--_-
11201 INST./ELEC.SHELVING RACK -__ 10,000 10,000
11201 FLOW METER REPLACEMENTS/SAMPLER REPLACEMENT 10,000 10,000 _10,000 10,000 10,000 10,0.00 lo,00o
11201 DIG LEVEL SENSORS -
10,000 10,000
11701 SERVER UPGRADE 15,000
12201 STATIONARY SAMPLER W/ENCLOSURE 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
12201 CHLORINE SAFETY EQUIPMENT 10,000 10,000 10,000
12201 PORTABLE SAMPLERS9,000 10,000
12201 SAMPLER ENCLOSURE 4,600 _ 4,800
12201 INTERCEPTOR REDOX PROBES 10,000 10,000
266,300 216,000 129,000 189,100 192,80 237,200T 154,000
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY -- f
1,110,800 959,500 798,5001 745,600 974,80 1,129,700, 900,500
1
8 OF 9
I:\Excel\budget2001\casMbw\CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xIs
• • • • . • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • •
Salt Lake City Corporation Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/20/2003
SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL •
2003 thru 2008
PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBER DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007J 2007.2008 2008-2009
GRAND TOTAL 10,106,525 34,753,000 4,563,500 15,705,60C1 8,144,80c1 6,640,70(4 6,215,500
-- L
CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,110,800 959,500 798,500 745,600 974,800 1,129,700 900,500
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 11,217,325 35,712,500 5,362,000 16,451,200 9,119,600 7,770,400 7.116,000
•
9 OF 9
I:\Excel tbudget2001\cashflow\CIP FILESCIPcashflow2004.xls
•
•
•
•
•
•
Stormw'ater Fund
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P
• STORMWATER UTILITY .
• ENTERPRISE FUND
. BUDGET SUMMARY
. FY 2004-2006
. AMENDED PROJECTED PRiOPOS R: : FORECAST FORECAST
. ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL <> <:B !GET:<.<;. BUDGET BUDGET
SOURCES 2001-2002 2002-03 2002-03 : >2003 4 2004-05 2005-06
1111 REVENUES .
METERED SALES $5,293,726 $5,295,199 $5,295,199:: >€€ '.$5;348.s $5,401,632 $5,455,650
IP INTEREST INCOME 269,490 300,000 270,000 : :: <::«270000 270,000 270,000
. OTHER REVENUES 9,336 40,000 40,000 :: ::` 40,00a. 10,000 10,000
ID TOTAL REVENUES $5,572,552 $5,635,199 $5,605,199 :::: ::>:$5;65815 $5,681,632 $5,735,650
OTHER SOURCES
IP GRA
NTS&OTHER RELATED REVENUE: 1 106 308 716 000 716 000':<:::'? �><' `: �'. ���
$ $ $ :.::..5�1$,Qt)1# $716,000 $716,000
......................::.........
• OTHER SOURCES 0 0 0 ::':::: :?::?: »> '.>.>t>: 0 0
IMPACT FEES 246,252 250,000 250,000 >: ::: ::: •40;00E 250,000 250,000
110 BOND PROCEEDS 0 9,000,000 »> 000 001 0 0
11) T 0 T A L OTHER SOURCES $1 352 560 $9 966 000 $966,000:`< 966 000 $966,000
TOTA
L SOURCES $6,925,112 $15,601,199 $6,571,199>s :�: ' iiiii
$101;y51 $6,647,632 $6,701,650
EXPENSES&OTHER USES
EXPENDITURES
PERSONAL SERVICES $1,293,107 $1,449,140 $1,449,140 $1,480:4 $1,524,970 $1,571,134
• ::::::::OPERATING&MAINTENANCE 57,807 119,150 119,150 :: >: 119a650 $121,732 $123,856
▪ TRAVEL&TRAINING 1,214 10,760 10,760::::<::: ::::€ :€:10760 $10,780 $10,800
UTILITIES 52,476 54,631 54,631 :: ::: ::::::::::55;841: $56,873 $57,394
D PROF&CONTRACT SERVICES 686,057 759,067 759,067 :€ :€<:€:€::789405: $775,205 $781,136
.........................
.................................
. DATA PROCESSING 134,225 131,770 131,770 :::::::; :'::: €35,000 $135,000 $135,000
FLEET MAINTENANCE 129,001 136,784 136,784 140 88S $143,705 $146,580
................:................
ID ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE FEE 44,057 41,200 41,200:: :::::::':.::60;0t $61,800 $63,654
PAYMENT IN LEIU OF TAXES 91,215 94,760 94,760 ; € !132;0 0 $132,000 $132,000
. OTHER CHARGES AND SERVICES 27,472 60,600 60,600[:?::: : '. ":46 92Z $48,063 $49,577
..................... ..........•
...............................
.................................
................................
0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,516,630 $2,857,862 $2,857,862:::`::::::::$2950517 $3,010,128 $3,071,131
OTHER USES
----------------
CAPITAL OUTLAY $323,236 $740,000 $740,000 >':$10i $436,200 $105,000
. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 3,058,812 6,549,311 3,292,816`::::::: ::!11 E75000: 8,570,000 3,040,000
DEBT SERVICES 0 375,000 0 :::: >:800031k: 800,000 800,000
IP TOTAL OTHER USES $3,382,048 $7,664,311 $4,032,816 ::::` s$12 51;55 00i $9,806,200 $3,945,000
. TOTAL USES $5,898,679 $10,522,173 $6,890,678 M€:€:::$15 465 61l $12,816,328 $7,016,131
.................................
.................................
EXCESS REVENUE AND OTHER
. SOURCES OVER(UNDER)USES $1,026,433 $5,079,026 ($319,479): :: :$84. 496i!: ($6,168,696) ($314,481)
...........................:.....
..................................
10
OPERATING CA
SH A H BALANCES
BE
JULY 1 $9,251,625 $10,278,058 $10,278,058:=:: : M.4.; 579: $9,117,113 $2,948,417
0 ENDING JUNE 30 $10,278,058 $15,357,084 $9,958,579:::: :::;::: 1471:13: $2,948,417 $2,633,936
Cash Reserve Ratio(Acceptable range 10%to 25%) 348% :::::E < :;':309%"s 98% 86%
oh Operating cash balance is defined as total cash less restricted amounts for
bond covenants and outstanding accounts payable.
110
. I:Excel/
Budget2003/St03sum
STORMWATER UTILITY
CASH FLOW
ACTUAL ACTUAL CURRENT BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGE BUDGET
-- - _ YEAR- -YEAFF--Bl b-GE'f YEAi2 YEAR --YEAR YEAR YEAR - YEAR - YEAR
2000-200T-- 2001-2002 2002-2000 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2-007-2008 2008 2000
STORMWATER CHARGES 5,190,863 5,293,726 5,295,199 5,348,151 5,401,632 5,455,650 5,510,207 5,565,310 5,620,965
OTHER INCOME 52,601 9,336 35,000 35,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
INTEREST INCOME _ 379,807 269,489 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000 270,000
OPERATING INCOME 5,623,271 5,572,551 5,600,199 5,653,151 5,681,632 5,735,650 5,790,207 5,845,310 5,900,965
OPERATING EXPENDITURES -2,620,938 -2,516,630 -2,857,862 -2,950,617 -3,010,128 -3,071,131 -3,186,465 -3,252,701 -3,365,235
NET INCOME EXCLUDING DEP. 3,002,333 3,055,921 2,742,337 2,702,534 2,671,504 2,664,519 2,603,742 2,592,609 2,535,730
IMPACT FEES 567,946 246,252 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
OTHER RECEIPTS/ BOND PROCEEDS 8,000,000 - -"-
OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS 1,613,935 1,106,308 721,000 721,000 716,000 716,000 716,000 716,000 716,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY -90,526 -323,236 -740,000 -140,000 -436,200 -105,000 -511,000 -461,500 -430,000
DEBT SERVICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEBT SERVICE (NEW) 0 0 0 -800,000 -800,000 -800,000 -800,000 -800,000 -800,000
OTHER INCOME & EXPENSE 2,091,355 1,029,324 231,000 8,031,000 -270,200 61,000 -345,000 -295,500 -264,000
AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL 5,093,688 4,085,245 2,973,337 10,733,534 2,401,304 2,725,51,9 2,258,742 2,297,109 2,271,730
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS I -4,666,112 -3,058,812 -3,292,816I -11,575,000 -8,570,000 -3,040,000 -1,790,000 -1,720,000 -1,670,000
CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 427,576 1,026,433 -319,479 -841,466 -6,168,696 -314,481 468,742 577,109 601,730
BEGINING CASH BALANCE 8,824,049 9,251,625 10,278,058 9,958,579 9,117,113 2,948,417 2,633,936 3,102,679 3,679,788
CASH INCREASE/(DECREASE) 427,576 1,026,433 -319,479 -841,466 -6,168,696 -314,481 468,742 577,109 601,730
ENDING BALANCES 9,251,625 10,278,058 9,958,579 9,117,113 2,948,417 2,633,936 3,102,679 3,679,788 4,281,518
DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.38 3.34 3.33 3.25 3.24 3.17
RATE CHANGE ---__-- --___--
_ 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL WATER
BILL (1991436.00) $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00
Cash Reserve Ratio (acceptable range 10-20) 352.99% 408.41% 348.46% 308.99% 97.95% 85.76% 97.37% 113.13% 127.23%
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • •
111PWWWWW1111 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 4110 4111 4111 411 Illo 411 4110 4111 4111 •
Salt Lake City Corporaton Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/17/2003
STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
COST PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBERS DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
53� 103 `-2720.05 LTFT STATIONWIP 53-10301-2772.10 __-.._ _ _ _
53471009 [ES-1#71->400 S.JORDAN RIVER - _
53471011 1400NORTH REDWOOD ROAD _
53471014 3001-RTH NEW STAR DRIVE (ON HOLD)
53471017 -- A-RTaFD 851 - -----_ _ _--
3471018 SIR TIMOTHY LIFT STATION - 61,007 ------ - - -
-53-470T015 LIBERTY PARK LIFT STATION-1300 SOUTH 500 EAST(COMPLETE-UPGRADE) 120,000 ---- -- -__-_
63470715 700 WEST-500 NORTH LIFT STATION (NEED TOR NEW LIFT STATuADU€TO CED-PROJECT) 120,000 - - -----___-_-_-
- 53470716 400 WEST 1300 SOUTH LIFT STATION (CONTROL-PANEL,CHECK VALVES,DISCHARRE-P1PE) 70,000 -- - -
53470717- PARK UNDERDRAIN LIFESTATION-1910 WES1 1030 WORTH (NEW PUMPS AND CONTROL PANEL) 50,000 - -
- 53470718 OAKLY LIFT STATION-1200 WEST 1200NOR'TH(PUMPS,DISCHARGE AND CONTROL-PANEL) - 150,000 --------- ---
0470719 OIL DITCHIJFT STAPION-1250 WES f 2000 NORTH (NEW PUMPS AND CONTROL PANELS) - 500,000
-4476720 400 WE-Sri300 SOUTH LIFT STATI ( L A SCHARG-E) - -- 120-000 ----------- -
53470721 PAXTON AVENUE LIFT STATION=i00 WEST-PAXTON AVENUE (PUMPS;34SOHARGE&CONTROL-PANEL) -- 120,000
53470T14 NEW STAR LIFT STATION-300 NORTH NEW STAR DRIVE (NEW-PUMPS AND CONTROL PANEL) -- --- - - - so,o00 VARI
100,000 100;000---100,Ob0^-----106,000 ----100,000 100,000
301,858 220,000 250,000 720,000 220,000 150,000 100,000
-10301 273020b-ETENTIONB-ASd3 WIPT3-1030T3773.1tl - -_-_
LEE DRAIN
-
---- [ES-1,#15]>LTSER I Y PARR' 5,000 ---- - - -
---- -- 5;1300 6 0 0 0 0 0
53-1030i--- 2730.18 COLLECTION MAINS-WIP 53-10301-2773.10 __-
--------------
-53470518 AMERICAN BEAUTY(1030w)-OIL DRAIN DICTH TO DUPONT DOWN TO 1200 W
-- 8,185 80,000 ---------- -- ----------
0470547 GUAHL`MAN WAY 500 SOUTH TO SUNNYSIDE - 1,500 60,000 '---- ------------"--- ------ - i
5347071 10 -2100 SOUTH 1-0 1700 SOUTH,1700 SOUTH-2100 EAST TO 2300 EAST 10,840 650,000 ------- ------' -"--_----- -
53470691 -ORESTVIEW AND OAKVIEW DR-INLETS - 2,000 313,844 ---' -
0470698 [ES-1,#11] MOO SOUTH-500 WEST TO 900 WEST -765-000
53470354 [ES-1,#12]->900 SOUTH-JORDAN RIVER - H I _ 8,580 302,324 9,000,009 - - --
(ES-1,#121->900 SOUTH-STATE STREET TO 600 EAST-PHASE II 3,850 5,000000 - -'
BY P(:A
[ES-1,#21]->50 SOUTH GADSNT -
-1ES-1,#22)->1500 SOUTH 1-215 -
-_ -UP RAIL ROAD 3,000 240,000 NORTHWEST OIL DRAIN 600 NROTH TO 1200 WEST - 200,000
5347072 R (12 0 H�00 WEST TO530 WEST) 2,100 140,000 -- -" -,
2565 WEST-1520-SOUTH TO 1550 SOUTH (ANDREW AVENUE 36") 45,000 - - -------'---------
29,195 787,008 10,345,000 5,650,000 0 0 0 0
3PEC1ALPROJ€CIS
53470380 WEST EAST LIGHT RAIL 400 SOUTH 40,000
`53470596 '500 WEST-NORTH TEMPLE TO 400 SOUTH (CEb NO.103009) 3,500 103,319 -
-5347905 BETWEEN 400 WEST AND 500 WEST-BETWEEN NORTHfiEMPLE AND-220 SOUTH 1,500 - 1,269 --- - -
- - 70613 500 WEST-200 NORTH TO 400 NORTH 15,000
52470724 2100 SOUTH LIGHT RAIL CROSSING 94,000
VI L
53470725 200 WES A 1 HY CIRCLE TO 2100 SOUTH - 22,000
- -- --__-_- - -_---
-53470732 1700 SOUTH 500 WEST TOJORDAN RIVER (SAME PROJECT AS 1700 S-500 W TO 800W) 3,719 - -
53470734 EAST LIBERTY PARR-PHASEII - 58,172
-- 5,000 337,479- 6 0 0 0 0 0
-ZED-DRIVEN PROJECTS 200,056 200,000 200,000 --200�03 200,000
008 3270 EAST WEST LIGHT RAIL 70000 ---"
53470548 SOUTITTEMPLE-STATE STREET TO VIRGINIA STREET(1250 E)(CED JGB NO.102010) 2,800 40,000 -- ----- -
33470586 GLENDALE STREET-RAVAJO STREET TO GLENDALE CIRCLE(GLENDALE AREA STUDY GB NO.102044) 1,650 - - - -
-53470599 GLEOJIK STREET(2900 W)-5OO S TO 1820 S(CED JOB NO.103007) (ENGIINEERING STUDY AND CONSTRUCTION) 18,987 500,00- - -- -
53470697 DUPON - L A T 284
-53470695 MONTGOMERY STREET-GLENDALE CIRCLE TO 1300 SOUTH (GLENDALE AREA STUDY-JOB NO.102044) 225,000 - - --
1 OF 3
I\Excel\budget2001\cashflow\\ClPcashflow2004.xls
Sall Lake City Corporalon Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/17/2003
STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
COST PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBERS DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 20011.2009
53470710 1300 SOUTH-1700 EAST TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 35,000
53470726--TLLINOIS AVENUO--2ORDAN RIVER TO CONCORD STREET (GL2NU,L AREA STUDY-JOB NO.102044)- 250,000 - - -'- ----------
53470727 1200 WEST-ILLINOISAVENUE TO SOUTH OF MEAD (GLENDA-LE AREA STUDY-JOS.N0T02044) 110,000 - ----- --------
53476728 CONCOROSTREET-ILLINOIS AVENUE TOTEEAD (GLENDALE AREA-ETU"(=JOB NO 02o44) 110,,000 - - -
53470729 600 WEST-500 NORTH TO 600 NORTH - 800 100,000 -- ---------' ------------------------
53470730 900 SOUTH-700 EAST TO 1100 EAST 2 60,000
-5T470731 500 EAST•1300 SOUTH TO 2100 SOUTH - - 650,000 -----------"-- -
- 53470-713 100SA$fi-- 10,(100 - - -
-53473001 2106 SOUTH-REDWOOD ROAD TO 900 WEST - 403,000
CEO ASPRALTOVERLAY PROJECTS FOR EY2003-04 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS) T5,600 -` --" '------------
- UTAHNA DRIVE(1165 W)-1350 SOUTH TO 1170 WEST(JOB NO.102103) 230300 - - -
1300 SOUTH-MONTGOMERI STREET TO GLENDALE STT2€ET 200,006 - - - -
VARIOUS-LINES -
- ---AM-RAMPS- - 600,000 660,300' 600,000- 600,000 800300
- - - 20,000 20,000 20;000 20,000--------20,000 -20,000 20,000
---------- 2,600 1,000,271 260,000 1,920,000 1,570,000 820,000 820,000 820,000
_ - LOCAT=AREA4187ECT -€WSJ ---- -------
474065 VARIOUS PROJECTS - - 100,000 200 000- 200,000 200,000 200,000 -200,000- 200 000
- -- 10-ST HARRISON TO EMERSSFT- 35,000 - - -
_ HARRISAVEWESTTEMPLE=INLETS - - 4,500 - -
- 13-00 S NAVAJO-INLETS _ -- 3,000 - -
820 S 3600 W-Iit ETS - - 3,000 - ---------------------------- -
_ ---------6TH AVE"C'ST-4 INLETS,DE 2 1 L Ts - 250 16,000 ----------------- ------- --- --- ----------
- 10TH AVE-"L"Sfi-INLETS ARD-SLIPLINE - 250- 16,000 - -
SIG-SE AND MILITARY WAY-INLET 1,200 _ -"_ - __._____
_ MISSION RO 1200 S-INLETS,PIKE 1 b STEWART
600 30,000'
STR-AVE"K"ST-INLETS AND SLIPLINE 230 18,000-- - - -
7TH AVE"D"ST•OULETS AND DEMO-INLET 4,500 ------ - ----- -----
- 1STAVE„I„ST-INLETS 8006 - - -
VIIRGINIA ANDS.TEMP-LE-INLET - 1,500 - - - - -----VIRGINIA ARD-P FURY AVE-3 INLETS A 1HD LIPLINE 70 8,500 --- --------- ---- ---- ------
fl6bOW-60oN
- 14,000 - --800 N'MORTON DR _ 14,000 -- - -----------
--------- -- 1,420 /71,200 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
'Slb VART6US STR€ETS-DIP STONE REPLACEMENT
- -- �Ir 50,000 50�6o 50,000 50,000 50,000 56,600 30,060
CONTRIBUTIONS BYLSEVELOPERS '500,000 500;000 500000 -560,000 --500,000- 566,000 500006
--------------- _ 1,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550.000 550,000 550.000
-TOTAL COLLEOT IWNES 39,215 2,985,958 93355,000 9-,320000 2,320,000 -1,570,000 7370-00 1,570,005
-- - TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS _ 3,292,816 11,575,000 8,570,000 3,040,000 1,790,000 1,720,000 1,670,000
2750.10 Motive Replacement Auto&Truck
-10201- - -- BOBTAIL DBMP-2 la-'ON - 70,000 - 70,000
1020T - 1 T'0N HD TRUCK WDU-MN 35,000 35,000 36,000
10201 2TON DUMP TRUCK - 60,000 60,000
10201- 3� 1'1'CKUP4X4 ____________ _____ 60,000
-- 60,000 30_000 60,000
10201--- - -TTON H6filzUCK W/UTILITY�ED -- - 38,000 "---- - -------
- 30{ 7ULLOIZED-TRUCK - 24,000 - ----- -
10701 -- TRUCK- -- - _ - -"-
--T020T---- -- 22,000 ---- - 22,006--- ---- 22,000
260,000
--- - - - --_ 105,000 119,000 142,000 74,000 92,000 290,000 142,000
27 0.330 iel aint Equipment
--T0201 - --- -- BACKHO-E-. -- -
--- -------------------------
1,000 1,000 1,000------two ----"--1,000 ------2,000----'"27006
2 OF 3
I\Excel\budget2001\cashflow\\CIPcashflow2004 xl
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
ww . wwwf • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Salt Late City Corporaton Last Update
Department of Public Utilities 2/17/2003
STORM DRAIN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FIVE YEAR PROPOSAL
2003 thru 2008
COST PROJECT FEET OF FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR FISCAL YR
CENTER NUMBERS DESCRIPTION PIPE 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
10201 VACTOR TRUCK 253,000 255,000 258,000
-TOM 10 WHEEL DUMP TR-UCR 100,000 130,000
10201 BACKHOE 710JD
VACTOR-TRUCK 140,000
— — - 256,000 _— - 256,000
2760.30 Telemeterinq
10201 SCADA FOR LIFT STATIONS 10,000 1.00f 10,080 10,000 1 1111 1//. 1111
1,174'1 1,111 •1111.111.1
1•11 1 111 1 111 1 111
2760.50 Office Equipment 5,000In -10,00a
1
---- - ElliMpimmiv,
1 II!mimmiummus 1 111
2760.90 Other Equipment - -
�201----- CEMENT MIXER -_-_-
10201- TOW ALONG COMPRESSOR 4,500
-
111 -- --------------- 15,000
-�0201 REAR DUMP CEMENT MIX€R
1•
10701 COIUPOSTIESAMFLERS 10,000 1o601 10,1// -10;000 1-0,000 1••1 10,075f
—-------- 1,PP1 •,111 A 1 111 1 111ll
• 11 1 111
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
-- -- 740,000 140,000 436,200 105,000 511,001 461,500 430,000
GRAND TOTAL r
---- 4,032,816 11,715,000 9,006,200 3,145,000 2,301,000 2,181,500 2,100,000
3 OF 3
\Excel\budget2001\ceshflow\\ClPcashtOw2004 xis