05/21/1993 - Minutes SALT LAKE VALLEY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
AGENDA
Friday, May 21, 1993
11:00 A.M.
West Valley City Council Chambers
3600 South Constitution Blvd. (2700 West)
West Valley City, Utah
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Approval of Minutes (April 23, 1993)
2. Recommendation on June Budget Adjustments
3. Recommendation on Selection of SRS/Compost Contractor
DISCUSSION AND INFORMATION ITEMS:
1. Modular Building Construction Update - Daniel Bauer
2. Operations Update - Bud Stanford
3. Recycling Update
4. Other
***Reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities
provided upon request. Contact Russell Willardson, Director, West
Valley City Public Works, 966-3600. agendas3.may
„ *It Cattntu
.to
m !uxrPuarkr of !IL1mmizzirnwr
May 19. 1993
Jim Bradley, Chairman
4 Randy Horiuchi
C! N Brent Overson
Mr. Romney M. Stewart, Director
Solid Waste Division
7125 South 600 West
Midvale, Utah
Dear Mr. Stewart:
The Board of County Commissioners, at its meeting held this day.
approved the final draft of the Salt Lake County Solid Waste
Management Plan.
Pursuant to the above action, you are hereby authorized to deliver a
copy of the plan to the Utah State Department of Environmental
Quality and the Executive Secretary of the Utah Solid and Hazardous
Waste Control Board.
Very truly. yours,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SHERRIE SWENSEN, COUNTY CLERK
By
Deputy Cl
lh
cc: Public Works
2001 S State St Salt Lake City,Utah 84190-1000
b �
Minutes of the Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Council held
Friday, May 21, 1993 at 11:00 a.m. in the West Valley City Council
Chambers, 3600 South Constitution Boulevard, West Valley City, Utah
Those present: Brad Stewart Salt Lake City
Kent Miner SLC/Co. Health Department
Russell Willardson COG, West Valley City
Dr. Ryan Dupont Utah State University
Excused: Lonnie Johnson Salt Lake County
Others in Attendance:
Debra Jenkins Salt Lake County
Bob Davis TransJordan Landfill
Ted Sonnenburg ET Technologies
Cindy Morgan ET Technologies
Rainer M. Dahl Recycling Corp. of America
Chris Smart Recycling Info. Office
Bud Stanford Solid Waste Disposal
Daniel L. Bauer Solid Waste Disposal
Ralph Bohn State DEQ
Earl Jackson USU Extension Service
Romney M. Stewart Solid Waste Disposal
Pam Derbidge Solid Waste Disposal
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Approval of Minutes (April 23, 1993)
Ryan Dupont made a motion to approve the minutes of the
April 23, 1993 meeting as written; Kent Miner seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
2 . Recommendations on June Budget Adjustments
Romney Stewart reviewed the June budget adjustments being
recommended to the County Commissioners for approval . Those
adjustments include an increases passed on to the Landfill
from Fleet Management for parts and fuel based on 1992
figures. An increase is also necessary for excavation of
Landfill modules required by a change order for drainage of
the new modules. The water must drain south to 1300 South and
then to the Lee Drain instead of to the northwest. The
necessary permits have been obtained; this will provide a
permanent drainage solution for that area of the Landfill.
Funds will also need adjustment to improve litter control; a
12 foot fence will be installed on the south and east boundary
of Modules 1 and 2 . Landfill management feels they have a
responsibility to adjacent property owners to keep the entire
area as clean as possible. The two roll off trucks used at
the Citizen Unloading Facility have been in use constantly
1
with the increase of citizen loads and recyclable materials .
If one truck is down for repairs, the incoming material
accumulates faster than it can be hauled away. Recyclable
materials being brought to the Landfill necessitate five or
six trips per day to Intermountain Steel. The additional
truck will increase the efficiency in disposal of materials
from the Citizen Unloading Facility. Savings in other capital
items will offset most of the truck cost. An additional
$30, 000 is needed to cover the balance. It will also be
necessary to purchase equipment to handle the composted
material at the Landfill . The Consultant Selection Committee
has recommended that the composting project be handled in-
house at the Landfill by Landfill employees. It is proposed
that the capital asset account be increased to pay for a
compost turner ($75, 000) and a trommel screen to size the
compost to meet specifications for potential markets . A
trommel screen could be purchased for $100, 000 . However, if
available, renting a trammel screen would be appropriate
initially and the purchase could be postponed. Another
$80, 000 will be necessary to lease an additional tub grinder
with an operator for the remainder of this year. The current
tub grinder only handles approximately 1/3 of the green yard
waste material coming into the Landfill . The amount of
material coming in exceeds the currently machines capacity.
There are some other costs associated with the compost
operation that can be absorbed into existing line items . By
November, 1993, management should have additional information
on the budget commitments needed for 1994 . The funding for
the June budget adjustments should be adequately provided by
ongoing revenues and, if any of the capital equipment
expenditures require additional funds, there are sufficient
reserves to cover the purchases. If 35, 000 tons of yard waste
can be diverted from the Landfill disposal site, at the rate
of $13 . 00 per ton, a $455, 000 value in space per year would be
made available for other solid waste. The value of the saved
space more than offsets the expense of the equipment and
manpower commitment to upscale the compost operation.
In terms of revenue, the volume over the first four months has
shown a 2 .5% increase over the same period in 1992 .
Nevertheless, an adjustment in revenue is not recommended for
the balance of the year. Revenues appear to be sufficient to
cover the 1993 budget.
Russell Willardson made a motion that the Council approve the
June budget adjustments outlined; the motion was seconded by
Ryan Dupont. The motion passed unanimously.
3 . Recommendation on Selection of SRS/Compost Contractor
Brad Stewart indicated the Landfill had received six bids on
the proposal; the Consultant Selection Committee interviewed
2
{ the top two companies orally.
The Consultant Selection Committee recommended the composting
project be handled in-house by the Landfill and recommended
that E.T. Technologies be awarded the SRS contract.
Kent Miner made a motion to accept E.T. Technologies proposal
on the SRS project and award them the contract for the Soil
Regeneration Site subject to Landfill management working out
minor details concerning the project. The motion was seconded
by Russell Willardson. The motion passed unanimously.
A very strong composting proposal was received from Scott that
would have worked well at the Landfill; however, the proposal
was very expensive. The Landfill would be responsible under
the proposal for many of the components that should have been
included in the contractor' s package. The proposal was
excellent and would have worked; Scotts indicated the project
would produce 40, 000 to 80, 000 tons per year. The product
would have been very refined and packaged in vinyl bags for
sale in home centers regionally. The Landfill would have paid
substantial fees to have Scotts take over the project and no
funds would have been returned to the Landfill for their
participation in the project.
Ryan Dupont made a motion to approve the recommendation from
the Consultant Selection Committee to have the Landfill handle
the composting/mulching project in house; the motion was
seconded by Russell Willardson. The motion passed
unanimously.
The material will be very useful as mulch and cover material
for Kennecott Copper, Parks Departments, State highway
shoulder erosion control, or for cover/moisture retention for
Landfill modules.
DISCUSSION AND INFORMATION ITEMS:
1. Modular Building Construction Update - Daniel Bauer
Daniel Bauer indicated that the footings for the new office
building had been poured a week ago; the foundation walls were
poured early this week. The septic holding tank has also been
capped. The construction was delayed a week and a half
because .of wet weather. The projected completion date is now
August 1 . The interior furnishings selection is being
completed.
Wolf Excavating is continuing with the construction of ponds
2 and 3 left from last year. Herm Hughes Construction is
completing their contract on the Subtitle D designed Module 2
from last year; they are working with the Health Department on
3
approval of the subbase and placing the liner. Herm Hughes
was also awarded the bid on the construction of Module 1 to be
constructed this year under Subtitle D regulations. Ponds #4
and 5 will be out to bid very shortly.
2 . Operations Update - Bud Stanford
Bud Stanford stated that the Landfill has been very busy; the
overall volume of material brought to the Landfill for
disposal during the month of April was very high. The number
of vehicles bringing materials to the Landfill for disposal on
Saturday was down during April 1993; the highest count on a
Saturday in April, 1993 was 2, 000. The highest count on a
Saturday in April, 1992, was 3,300. The materials recycled in
April, 1993 was the highest monthly amount so far; $18, 000 was
paid for materials.
There were a few citizen complaints regarding fees; those
complaints were primarily due to confusion on the
reinstitution of half fees during April and full charges in
May. Those complaints were handled at the Landfill.
There have been some personnel changes; Clarence Keyes retired
April 15 and Jeff Wolf was promoted to fill the position of
Assistant Operations Supervisor. Vic Magera was promoted to
Lead Heavy Equipment Operator, replacing Jeff Wolf.
Module 6 N on Wildlife Resources is near completion; the
disposal site will move to the lined area of Module 2 north of
1300 South in July. The first lift on the liner will be four
feet; the next lift will be six feet. Daily cover will be
implemented in the new cell at that time; three options are
being considered. Daily cover will be required in October
1993 under Sub title D.
3 . Recycling Update
Chris Smart reported that the Bag-A-Thon was a success. The
litter clean up effort was conducted on May 1 in cooperation
with Glad Bag. Eleven thousand + volunteers representing 36
groups and schools were involved from April 17 to May 1. The
project finished on May 1 at Wheeler Farm; volunteers were
treated to lunch compliments of Hardees. Thirty three
thousand pounds of litter were collected and brought to the
Landfill for disposal; additional material was recycled. The
Bag-A-Thon will be held again next year; the Recycling
Information Office will start preparing in September, 1993 for
the 1994 project. Glad Bag provided $300 in cash prizes for
distribution on May 1; six $50 cash prizes were awarded. The
project was a learning experience for everyone involved. The
bags left from the Bag-A-Thon will be used in a mini bag a
thon to clean up Wildlife Resources property.
4
The next recycling event will be distribution of home
composting units to reduce the green waste brought to the
Landfill. Toro Home Composters are being offered for sale to
residents of Salt Lake County at the wholesale price of
$49 . 50 . The units can be purchased at several locations
including the Landfill. The project is sponsored jointly by
the Recycling Information Office and Public Works. There have
been several PSA' s on TV and radio. The units will hold 28
bushels of material; 12 bushels a week can be added.
Composted material is ready for use in 28 days. The units have
a 5 year guarantee. The units will be available all summer
long; County Sanitation can purchase the units is lots of
1, 000 for distribution.
4 . Other
The County Commissioners have accepted the County wide Solid
Waste Management Plan and requested it be forwarded to the
State for approval.
The next Landfill Council meeting will be held on June 25,
1993 at 11:00 a.m.
Motion to adjourn by Ryan Dupont at 11:30 a.m. ; seconded by Kent
Miner. The motion passed unanimously.
mins93 .may
5
MEMORANDUM
Date : May 21 , 1993
To : Salt Lake Valley Solid Waste Management Council
From: Romney M. Stewart, Landfill Manager
Subject : June 1993 Budget Adjustment Request, Solid Waste Disposal
Division, Fund 540-4750
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS:
1 . Increase Line Item #2419 Small Equipment and Decrease Asset
Account by $45 , 000 : Due to a change in the capitalization dollar
amount set by the County Auditor (Increase from $500 to $700) , the
furniture order for the Administration/Employee Building should be
expended out of line item #2419 Small Equipment rather than the
landfill asset account . This is because most of the furniture
items are now below the new $700 figure whereas before the change
many were greater than $500 .
2 . Increase Line Item #2541 Maintenance Autos/Trucks by $32 , 625 :
Due to high maintenance costs for equipment parts during 1992 per
May 6th Fleet Management Memo.
3 . Increase Line Item #2510 Gasoline, Diesel, Oil & Grease by
$6, 041 : Based on fuel usage during 1992 per May 6th Fleet
Management Memo .
4 . Increase Line Item #3830 Excavation Landfill by $150, 000 : To
provide money for an unforeseen drainage improvement ($80, 000)
necessary to collect and direct water to Lee Drain and for 12 ' high
fencing ($70 , 000) along the east and south boundaries of Modules 1
& 2 to collect litter and restrict access .
5 . Increase Capital Asset Account by $30, 000 to cover cost of
Roll-Off Truck for Current Operations : Actual cost is estimated to
be $90, 000 but a lesser amount is requested because of budget
savings from other capital items is available . Actual bids for
other equipment items and the building came in less than original
budgeted amounts . This additional truck will increase our hauling
productivity by 50% and is sorely needed to handle the volume of
waste and recyclable materials coming through our public unloading
facility. Our existing two trucks can not cycle quickly enough to
handle the volume of waste; a near crisis occurs when there is a
truck breakdown . The result is overloading and spillage, delays in
delivery of recyclable materials to our contractor and yard
waste\mulch materials to grinding and composting areas .
6. Commitment to Compost Program: The election by the Salt Lake
Valley Solid Waste Management council to have the landfill upscale
its mulch/compost operations requires an immediate commitment of
capital and operating expenses for start up this budget year.
Additional capital and operating expenses will be requested in the
1994 budget to operate the compost project at the desired capacity
of 35,000+ tons per year. Those budget adjustments requested for
the balance of 1993 are as follows:
a. Increase the Capital Asset Account by $175,000 to cover
the cost of a Trommel Screen ($100,000) and a Compost Turner
($75,000) .
b. Increase line item #2830 Rent of Equipment by $80,000 to
pay for leasing a tub grinder with operator for the balance of
the year.
c. Increase line item #2930 Other Professional Fees by
$10,000 to pay for a compost consultant to provide guidance on
the establishment of a compost program and to ensure product
specifications are met.
d. Add one permanent Heavy Equipment Operator Allocation
costing $40,000 including benefits. This person would run our
grinder, operate the loader, trommel screen, and compost
turner. He or she would be trained and assigned permanently
to the compost project.
It is anticipated that a proposal will be made in the 1994 budget
for additional capital and operating expenditures in order to
increase and accelerate compost production. We will consider
either purchasing a tub grinder ($200,000) or continuing to lease
a tub grinder for the full year based upon this year's leasing
experience. Also, a front end loader/tool carrier ($155,000) ,
fencing of the compost operation ($27,000) , another heavy equipment
operator ($40,000) , and additional equipment maintenance and fuel
costs ($100,000) will likely be needed.
REVENUES:
Through April, YTD tonnage has increased 2.59,-; over the same period
in 1992. Should this amount of increase continue throughout the
rest of 1993, the landfill will receive an additional $217,250 in
revenue. However, landfill management is not recommending an
adjustment in budgeted revenue at this time. An undetermined
amount of revenue from the compost project is expected by year's
end but will not be known and maximized until 1994. Therefore, no
additional revenue is projected for this year. It is expected
that, at a minimum, the commercial sales price of the finished
product should be set to recover the cost of producing the compost.
It should be remembered that the real savings associated with the
compost project is in expensive Subtitle D landfill capacity. At
$13 per ton, diverting 35,000 tons of yard waste conserves $455,000
worth of space per year for other solid waste.
5/21/93
i
t
PROPOSED CASH RESERVE FUND DESIGNATIONS
RESERVE FUND 12/92 CURRENT ADDITIONAL DESIGNATED ANNUAL GOALS IN TIME COMMENTS
CATEGORIES DESIGNATED DESIGNATION TOTAL 6/93 PAYMENT 1993 FRAME
BALANCE OF CASH BEGINNING DOLLARS
BALANCE 1994
PERSONAL INJURY $1,109,600 $240,400 $1,350,000 $130,000 $2,000,000 5 yrs.
&PROPERTY LIABILITY
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $333,333 $10,000,000 27 yrs. For all parcels. Risk increases over
_ life of landfill.
POST CLOSURE MAINTENANCE: $92,400 $164,956 $257,356 $252,377 $3,033,500 11 yrs. Prorated amount for volume in
(PRE SUBTITLE D closed modules based on EMCON
CLOSED PARCELS) estimates of Subtitle D maintenance
costs for thirty years.
CLOSURE& POST CLOSURE: $0 $0 $0 $962,963 $26,000,000 '27 yrs. Goal amount is reduced over time as
(SUBTITLE D ASSURANCE) closure money is annually budgeted
REQUIRED BY STATUTE and expended.
RESTORATION&END USE $200,000 $0 $200,000 $48,148 $1,500,000 27 yrs. Trails,rest areas,signage,
overlooks,trees,vegetation,
irrigation, restrooms, etc.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $589,349 • $74,653 $664,002 Replacement $664,002 Done Required replacement funds on hand
payment budgeted changes annually depending on
usage.
LANDFILL RELATED ON-SITE $250,000 $100,000 $350,000 $110,000 $2,000,000 15 yrs. Scales,equipment building,roads,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS utilities,office building,unloading
station, etc.
REPLACEMENT AND DIVERSION $150,000 $453,179 $603,179 $626,455 $10,000,000 15 yrs.
FACILITIES: (TRANSFER STATION,
MRF, COMPOSTING, CONST&
DEMO LANDFILL, LANDFILL
EXPANSION OR REPLACEMENT
TOTAL(12/92 CURRENT DESIGNATED BALANCE)+ $2,391,349 2$2,033,188 $4,424,537 $2,463,276
(ADDITIONAL DESIGNATION OF CASH BALANCE)
(DESIGNATED TOTAL 6/93)
•
UNDESIGNATED CASH $4,112,687 $1,000,000
tTwenty-Seven year life is based on 646,000(1991)total tons,2 percent annual growth,with daily cover,and landfilling and all currently owned parcels.
2Staff proposes retaining an undesignated cash balance of S1,000,000 to provide for operating capital,unforeseen budget adjustments.emergencies,etc. The balance of 1993 undesignated monies S1,882.688 plus the S150.500 already designated or a octal of S2,033,188 is proposed
to be allocated to reserve funds as indicated.
w y
5/21/93
SALT LAKE VALLEY LANDFILL
CASH RESERVE FUNDS
BACKGROUND
The Salt Lake Valley Landfill was established by Interlocal
Agreement in 1979 . The landfill and associated solid waste
operations were placed on an enterprise funding basis with the
intent to remove the landfill from any future dependency on
property taxes for support . All former fee exemptions were
eliminated and landfill tipping fees became the sole source of
payment for future asset acquisitions as well as payment of any
incurred liabilities . When fees were first assessed on citizen
loads in 1981 , these revenues were set aside for future closure and
restoration of landfilled parcels . This money accumulated until
1989 when reserve needs were again assessed and determined by
category. Since the Interlocal Agreement consolidating City and
County landfills in 1979 the size, scope, complexity, and
sophistication of operations have substantially increased.
Statutory requirements which require long term financial assurance
have also been implemented. Given the emergence of integrated solid
waste management systems, there is a regular need to periodically
address capital reserves .
Personal Injury & Property Liability - Each day hundreds of
patrons visit the landfill . The exposure of the landfill to
serious injury and property damage is substantial . Public
officials establishing the Interlocal Agreement intended that the
landfill enterprise fund be the primary source of restitution for
liability claims . Salt Lake County' s Risk Management Office has
recommended a funding goal of $2 million for such occurrences even
though governmental immunity statutes limit liability in any one
claim to $500 , 000 . It is felt that 5 years is a reasonable goal to
set aside this amount .
Environmental Liability - In the event the natural environment is
seriously contaminated (air, water, soils) by activities associated
with landfill operations, funding must be available for cleanup and
remediation activities . The extent and cost of such has been
extensive in some other communities . Even though operations are
being engineered and conducted according to state of the art
methodology, it is recommended that a $10 million reserve fund to
be accumulated over the 27 year life of the landfill . Contamination
problems often do not show up until years after operations
commence . This "environmental insurance" fund category would be
available for all landfilled parcels completed since operations
were consolidated under the Interlocal Agreement .
Post Closure Maintenance on Pre Subtitle D Closed Parcels -
Perpetual maintenance of closed parcels for 30 years is required by
Subtitle D. The parcels formerly used by the City and County (80
acres west of 72nd and Wildlife Resource parcels) require ongoing
maintenance in terms of leachate management, groundwater and gas
monitoring, drainage and erosion control, revegetation, and
inspections. The goal amount of $3 million was established by
determining the volume of solid waste in closed parcels and
prorating the cost according to EMCOM'S estimates of Subtitle D
thirty year maintenance costs for parcels north of 13th South. The
goal of 11 years was felt to be a reasonable time frame for
accumulating the maintenance fund since some maintenance costs have
already been incurred but twenty years or more remain. There is
not a legal requirement for financial assurance on parcels closed
prior to when Subtitle D becomes effective (October 9, 1993) .
Closure and Post Closure Subtitle D Financial Assurance Required by
Statute - The $26 million figure is a cumulative amount calculated
over 27 years as determined by EMCON in their master plan according
to draft Subtitle D accounting guidelines. This amount is not a
goal like other fund categories but is mandatory. The total
amount is adjusted downward annually over the remaining life of the
landfill as closure money is budgeted, expended, and work completed
on finished modules. It should be noted that the proposed draft
accounting standards upon which the above amount was calculated is
being now being modified by the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board to exclude some of the expensive final cover and leachate
collection system costs. A final draft standard reflecting such is
expected to be out in mid-July.
Restoration and End Use - The estimated cost to complete the end
use open area improvements (trails, rest areas, signage, trees,
vegetation, overlooks, restrooms, etc.) parcels north of 13th South
described in the EMCON master plan is $1,250,000. An additional
$250,000 is included for end use development on the 70 acres west
of 72nd West where a multi sports facility is proposed and for a
visitor overlook area on Wildlife Resources property. A 27 year
time frame is recommended for building the fund since widespread
public use is not expected until the landfill is completed.
Equipment Replacement - The $664,002 is the calculated amount of
replacement funds on hand at the end of 1993 in order to sustain a
stable budgeted amount of $854,813 over the next ten years. Year
end replacement funds are carried over and become available along
with the following year's budgeted amount for replacement needs.
Actual expenditure or usage during the year are drawn from the
budgeted amount and any additional money necessary comes from the
cash balance. Remaining funds on hand are again carried over to
the next year. A replacement schedule has been prepared for all
landfill vehicles and equipment items by County Fleet Management
based on a life expectancy for each item and projected replacement
costs adjusted for 5% inflation.
Landfill Related On-Site Capital Improvements - The $2 million
amount is based on the expected replacement value in 1993 dollars
for the scales, equipment building, office building, citizen
unloading station, and utilities . The time frame of 15 years shown
as a goal reflects the average useful life remaining of the above
mentioned improvements .
Replacement and Diversion Facilities : Transfer station, MRF,
Composting, Const. & Demo Landfill, Expansion or Replacement of
Landfill - The $10 million dollar target amount could be for a
single facility or a combination of facilities . The estimated
capital cost for a 500 TPD transfer station is $3 million and for
a 500 TPD MRF $6 million (per Weston) ; replacement of current
landfill acreage at market value is $4 . 5 million; equipment to
enhance and upscale the composting operation $650, 000 .
i
•
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT T
CASH FLOW PROJECTIONS
05/18/93
SOLID WASTE MGT./LANDFILL (ORG. 4750)
CURRENT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE
5.00% Annual Inflation Assumption $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
UNIT# LIFE 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
FORD F-250 PICKUP 2L008 6 15,134 20,281
CAT DOZER D9N 11L016 5 326,347 416,511
TEREX SCRAPER 29L003 7 370,426 521,227
TR.LOADER TO TOOL CARRIE 11L020 5 61,240 78,159
CHEV. 3/4 TON P.U. 2L013 6 15,891 21,295
CAT DOZER D9N 11L018 5 342,664 437,336
CAT COMPACTOR 11L019 4 263,973 320,861
BACKHOE 13L003 10 62,000
CHEV 4X4 PICKUP 2L013 6 16,685 22,360
INTRNL SERVICE TRUCK 4L004 5 115,891 147,910
CAT COMPACTOR 11L021 4 277,172 336,904
TEREX SCRAPER 29L005 7 408,395 574,652
CHEV. 3/4 TON P.U. 2L014 6 17,519 23,478
AUTOCAR ROOL-OFF TRUCK 4L005 5 105,726 134,936
CAT COMPACTOR 11 L022 4 305,582 371,437
JOHN DEERE TOOL CARIER 12L001 5 121,667 155,281
TUB GRINDER 17L005 10 165,000
:ORD 1 TON CREW CAB 2L015 6 19,912 26,684
;UTOCAR ROLL-OFF TRUCK 4L006 5 111,012 141,683
:AT DOZER D9N 11L023 5 395,822 505,180
:AT SCRAPER 29L006 7 450,255
IOHN DEERE MOTOR GRADE 10L005 7 180,749
:AT 613C WATER WAGON 29L007 7 191,300
:ORD F-250 PICKUP 2L016 6 19,315
:AT 627E SCRAPER 29L008 8 514,611
773,147 684,528 818,143 715,494 977,001 1,206,895 1,309,132 1,061,869 312,577 1,244,993 26,684
BEG. REPL. FUNDS ON HAND 589,349 664,002 834,287 870,956 1,010,275 888,086 536,004 81,685 (125,371) 416,865 26,684
USAGE DURING THE YEAR .(773,147) (684,528) (818,143) (715,494) (977,001) (1,206,895) (1,309,132) (1,061,869) (312,577) (1,244,993) (26,684)
SUBTOTAL (183,798) (20,526) 16,143 155,462 33,273 (318,809) (773,128) (980,184) (437,948) (828,129) (0)
REPL. PAYMENTS BUDGETED ,847,800 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 854,813 0
END. REPL. FUNDS ON HAND .664,002 834,287 870,956 1,010,275 888,086 536,004 81,685 (125,371) 416,865 26,684 (0)