Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05/06/2003 - Minutes (2)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah met in Work Session on Tuesday, May 6, 2003, at 5:30 p.m. in Room 326, Committee Room, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members Carlton Christensen, Van Turner, Eric Jergensen, Nancy Saxton, Jill Remington Love, Dave Buhler, and Dale Lambert. Also In Attendance: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; Gary Mumford, Deputy Council Director; Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson; Rocky Fluhart, Chief Administrative Officer; David Nimkin, Mayor' s Chief of Staff; Michael Sears, Council Budget and Policy Analyst; Diana Karrenberg, Community Affairs Manager; Lewis Zunguze, Planning Director; LeRoy Hooton, Public Utilities Director; Stephanie Duer, Water Conservation Coordinator; Russell Weeks, Council Policy Analyst; LuAnn Clark, Housing and Neighborhood Development Director; Elizabeth Giraud, Historic Preservation Planner; Tim Campbell, Director of Airports; Jay Bingham, Airport Chief Accountant; Joseph Moratalla, Airport Contract Payments; Mike Stever, Emergency Program Manager; Brenda Hancock, Human Resource Management Division Director; Susi Kontgis, Budget Analyst; Steve Fawcett, Management Services Deputy Director; Linda Hamilton, Police Civilian Review Board Investigator; and Scott Crandall, Deputy Recorder. Councilmember Christensen presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. AGENDA ITEMS #1. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. Cindy Gust-Jenson said Item B-1, budget proposal and Item C-1, housing public hearing would be televised. She said Item F-1, military leave of absence, the staff report included a number of options suggested by individual Council Members. Councilmember Christensen said issues raised after the Council's initial briefing included a retroactive effective date and life insurance coverage. Brenda Hancock said the department supported the January 1, 2003 effective date. Councilmember Lambert asked about supplemental military pay and health insurance. Ms. Hancock said less than half of the 23 jurisdictions surveyed paid supplemental pay. She said if the Council chose to provide supplemental pay, the department recommended $800 per month rather than paying the differential. She said the military's pay structure was complicated which made it difficult to calculate. She said she felt the life insurance provision was a good addition and would not be too costly. Ms. Hancock said the department felt health insurance coverage was not cost effective or necessary because employees were covered by military insurance. Councilmember Buhler said he was in favor of paying the differential. He said some employees made more in the military than their City job. He asked if the $800 provision could be limited to employees who earned less in the military. Ms. Hancock said that provision could be written into the ordinance. Councilmember Buhler said the Council could consider an option which required employees to apply for supplemental pay and provide income verification. Ms. Hancock said she estimated military salary would be 75% of employees City pay. She said paying the differential would cost more than $800 and require staff time and paperwork. Councilmember Buhler asked if any employees had a higher income in the military. Ms. Hancock said there might be a few but it depended on the area of service. She said a person could earn more one month and less the next. 03 - 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 Councilmember Jergensen asked how much it would cost to pay the difference. Ms. Hancock said they estimated $222, 000. She said the $800 proposal would cost approximately $192,000. Councilmember Christensen said he understood the City had to guarantee an employee' s job. Ms. Hancock said legally the City was required to allow employees to return to their jobs and have their pension contributions reinstated. Councilmember Saxton asked how health insurance benefits were handled regarding an employee's spouse or family. Ms. Hancock said if the policy was continued it would be treated like a Cobra payment. She said upon return, benefits would be reinstated without a waiting period. Councilmember Lambert asked if a health condition, developed during active duty, would create a preexisting condition. Ms. Hancock said if employees were covered by another health plan, they would be reinstated without a preexisting condition. Councilmember Buhler asked if savings from vacant positions were being taken into account. Ms. Hancock said no. She said those savings could help offset proposed costs. Councilmember Lambert asked about disability coverage. Ms. Hancock said short- term coverage was provided but employees paid for long-term coverage. Ms. Hancock said employees received disability protection in the military. Councilmember Buhler asked if any Council Members supported his suggestion for $800 or paying a differential. The majority of the Council did not support the suggestion. #2. INTERVIEW LISA FLORES PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION. Ms. Flores said she was an associate professor at the University of Utah and was involved in communication programs. She said she wanted to apply classroom principals to the community. Councilmember Christensen said the political makeup of the commission was required by statue and asked which party the applicant was affiliated with. Ms. Flores said she was a registered member of the Democrat Party. Councilmember Lambert asked about the applicant's understanding of the commission and how her background would contribute. Ms. Flores said she felt the commission needed to provide equity to the various issues which might arise. She said she felt her professional expertise would be an asset and was committed to issues of diversity. #3. INTERVIEW NISA SISNEROS PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE POLICE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD. Ms. Sisneros said she had been in Salt Lake for 10 years and worked with the Legal Defenders Office (LDO) . She said she was a criminal attorney and worked mainly on drug cases. She said she had previously worked in the child support division of the Attorney General' s Office. Council Members said it was important for the board to act neutrally and asked if the applicant felt she could be impartial in addressing issues which came before the board. Ms. Sisneros said she felt she could. She said the board needed to review all the facts before forming opinions. She said she did not see the position as the community against police and everyone's rights needed to be protected. Councilmember Lambert said he was concerned about potential conflicts with cases being handled by the LDO. Ms. Sisneros said she discussed the issue with her director before applying for the board. She said unless her clients were the subject of discussion, she did not feel there would be a conflict. She said she would recuse 03 - 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 herself in cases with potential conflict. Councilmember Lambert said he was also concerned how information obtained from the board might be used by the LDO. Ms. Sisneros said if the information was procedural in nature, she did not see a problem. She said any private or personal information would not be used or repeated. Councilmember Buhler asked what percentage of LDO cases involved City police. Ms. Sisneros said less than half. #4. INTERVIEW SCOTT MCCOY PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE POLICE CIVILIAN REVIEW BOARD. Mr. McCoy said he recently moved to Salt Lake and served as a law clerk on the Utah Supreme Court. He said he was currently employed with a local law firm. Councilmember Lambert asked if anything in the applicant's background would make it difficult to be neutral on potential issues. Mr. McCoy said he had experience on both sides and felt he could be objective. Councilmember Buhler asked if the applicant's current law duties included criminal defense work. Mr. McCoy said no. He said he was involved in complex commercial and federal securities related litigation. Councilmember Saxton asked how Mr. McCoy felt he was a fair representative of the citizens of Salt Lake. Mr. McCoy said he was drawn to the board due to the diversity requirement. He said he was a member of the gay and lesbian community and felt he could represent that community. #5. INTERVIEW MARY LEE ANDERTON PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Ms. Anderton said she had been an actor and was a stay-at-home mom. Councilmember Lambert asked about the applicant' s understanding of the committee and how her background would benefit the committee. Ms. Anderton said she understood organizations applied for grant money available through the City and the committee provided allocation recommendations. She said she was an ordinary citizen and had no formal expertise. She said she had a number of different jobs and felt she was a well-rounded person. She said she was open-minded and had common sense. #6. RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING THE MAYOR'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET FOR THE AIRPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004. View Attachment Tim Campbell, Joseph Moratalla, Jay Bingham, and Gary Mumford briefed the Council with the attached handout. Councilmember Christensen asked if there was any additional information. Mr. Mumford said no. Councilmember Jergensen asked what PFC stood for. Mr. Campbell said it stood for passenger facility charge. He said the charge was added to passenger tickets, collected by the airlines and remitted to the airport. He said the revenue was used primarily for capital projects. Councilmember Jergensen asked if PFC was different than landing fees. Mr. Campbell said yes. He said airlines paid landing fees directly to the airport. He said the fee was based on costs associated with landing facilities. Councilmember Jergensen said he thought airlines would just include the fee in passenger tickets. Mr. Campbell said some airlines did not include the fee and claimed that was why they were losing money. Councilmember Jergensen asked what AIP stood for. Mr. Campbell said it stood for airport improvement program. He said this was a federal grant program funded by a tax on passenger tickets. He said the tax went to the federal government which in turn was made available to airports in the form of capital project grants. Councilmember Jergensen asked how the money was distributed. Mr. Campbell said 03 - 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 applications were submitted to the federal government. He said the airport applied for as many grants as possible. Councilmember Jergensen asked about the Tooele airport. Mr. Campbell said the City owned the Tooele Airport. He said the Tooele Airport and Airport II were used as relief airports for small aircraft and training operations. He said he was working with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to install an instrument landing system at the Tooele Airport which would generate more training activity. Councilmember Jergensen asked about Airport II. Mr. Campbell said the airport had a good level of activity and was doing well. He said due to 911 and economic recession, aviation in general had been slow. Councilmember Jergensen said he was concerned about projected revenues and expenses and asked if the department felt there was a time in the future where income and revenue levels would cross. Mr. Campbell said no. Mr. Campbell said passenger travel was down which primarily affected variable revenue sources such as concessions, parking, and car rentals. He said parking revenues were increasing and he felt auto rental revenue would come back as well. He said expenses increased primarily due to new security requirements. He said additional police officers and operations employees were hired to meet required mandates. Councilmember Jergensen asked for a list of acronyms to be included in the reports. Councilmember Saxton asked about security expenses. Mr. Campbell said part of the police department's expense was paid by terminal rates and landing fees. He said expenses for federal security employees were paid entirely by the federal government. Councilmember Saxton asked about construction taking place at the south end of the airport. Mr. Campbell said a bridge was being installed as part of the three year landside program. He said the current bridge was being moved to make room for additional parking and rental car concession relocation. Councilmember Buhler asked about current improvement projects and new development. Mr. Campbell said new terminal construction would not take place for approximately ten years. He said some improvements were needed to preserve current infrastructure and upgrade security equipment. Councilmember Turner asked how current parking changes were geared toward new development. Mr. Campbell said the three year landside expansion was designed to consolidate long-term parking to provide more efficiency and less confusion. He said improvements were consistent with the master plan and would better position the airport to move forward with the new terminal. He said rental car service sites had to be relocated before the terminal and additional roadway system could be started. Councilmember Turner asked about the cost to reconfigure the main entrance. Mr. Campbell said the cost would be approximately $32 to $35 million. He said all baggage units would be replaced and a larger hospitality area would be created in Terminal II. He said the escalator would also be reoriented. Councilmember Turner asked how long the project would take. Mr. Campbell said approximately two years. Councilmember Christensen said due to time constraints additional discussion would be scheduled for May 8, 2003. Council Members were in favor. The meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. sc 03 - 4 • • SALT-LAKE:CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUDGET ANALYSIS—FLSCAL YEAR 2003-04 DATE: May 2, 2003 SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS STAFF REPORT BY: Gary Mumford CC: Rocky Fluhart, David Nimkin,Tim Campbell,Jay Bingham, Joseph Moratalla, Steve Fawcett, Susi Kontgis, DJ Baxter The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of the City and does not receive any general fund revenue or subsidy. The proposed budget makes it possible for the Department of Airports to reduce airline rents and fees at a time of financial hardship for the airlines. Proposed capital projects are for increasing airport security in compliance with federal mandates, addressing- customer service needs, and maintaining facilities. The proposed budget was reviewed and approved by airline representatives and the advisory board. DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS • PROPOSED BUDGET 2002-2003 2002-2003 _ 3� _ Difference Percent Budget Projected `' from projected Chan Actual Bud ; actual 9e Sources of funds Operating revenue $ 93,755,300 $ 90,219,200 _$= ,o1 $ (5,204,800) (5.8%) Other sources of funds _ =-- == - ==_ (grants,interest and 69,162,000 36,911,000 ''-1637 ' 129,424,700 450.6% accumulated passenger facility charge revenue) Total funds available $162,917,300 $127,130,200 _ 5 5011 : $124,219,900 97.7% Uses of funds .-- Operating expenses $62,474,500 $61,597,600 _ $ 3,984,000 6.5% Capital outlay 80,157,000 26,801,000 e,:127 101,178,600 377.5% Debt service 13,347,700 13,480,400 - 7 �: (3,752,600) (27.8%) Buyout of bonds - 848,000 � 00 45,951,200 etlLl'__"'LSA Increase of reserves 6,938,100 24,403,200 - _-'1, 1}9; (23,141,300) (94.8%) Total uses of funds $162,917,300 $127,130,200 -_`$251,350,i_00 $124,219,900 97.7% For fiscal year 2003-04, the Department of Airports is projecting an operating revenue decline of $5,204,800. Estimated operating expenses are proposed to increase by $3,984,000. A summary of estimated operating revenue and proposed expenses is on the following page. • • DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS • PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET Adopted _Pressed Percent 2002-2003 _:_2W3-20044 Difference Change Rent,leases,reimbursements Terminal rent $24,472,500 742, $ (729,600) (3.0%) Landing fees 17,805,200 43,'130; (4,674,900) (26.3%) Other building&site leases 7,488,400 7;$4 r,* - (142,500) (1:9%) Security changes to airlines 304,400 = 54,1 = 549,700 180.6% Ground transportation 458,700 ,_ 70O 130,000 28.3% General aviation hangars 828,200 & ; 5,000 0.6% Fuel farm lease 1,005,400 7 � (239,100) (23.8%) - Tenant telephone/paging fees 576,800 200 (49,600) (8.6%) Extraordinary service charges 469,200 456, (13,000) (2.8%) Concessions Auto parking 17,435,500 _:.t (3,126,300) (17.9%) Car rental 10,729,500 9 # _ (1,271,900) (11.9%) News&gifts 3,282,200 :'- 97,200 3.0% Food service 2,033,300 2 ; 275,700 13.6% Advertising 1,704,200 430,400 25.3% Flight kitchen 1,003,300 1,1 136,900 13.6% • Vending 320,600 38,100 11.9% Public telephone 231,100 # - (31,100) (13.5%) • Other revenue State aviation fuel tax 2,358,500 °.24 ,0 ` (29,500) (1.3%) Aircraft fire training revenue 457,000 7,200 1.6% Fuel oil royalties(6%applicable to 338,700 36,200 10.7% those not paying landing fees) Other operating revenue 452,600 _ 31 ;0 (139,800) -(30.9%) Total operating revenue 93,755,300 _ 014 _ (8,740,900) (9.3%) Operating expenses Maintenance 29,144,800 ' ,390;. = 1,245,100 4.3% Operations 15,228,900 ::17,4W0q3 2,255,500 14.8% Commercial Services 4,653,100 _ 6003+;2'. 381,100 8.2% Finance&Accounting 4,988,600 41 _ (41,200) (0.8%) Engineering 3,148,200 3102,1 (46,100) (1.5%) Planning&Environmental Services 1,981,000 =:2, ,106_ 564,100 28.5% Public Relations&Marketing 2,484,300 1147, (1,336,800) (53.8%) Administration 845,600 9311000 85,400 10.1% Total operating expenses 62,474,500 -6s$81,600: 3,107,100 5.0% Net operating income $31,890,300 $9 800 $(12,457,500) (39.1%) • 2 • POTENTIAL MATTERS AT ISSUE • Airline rents and landing fees - The Department of Airports continues to work with and support the airline carriers by keeping rents and landing fees as low as possible. The Department determined that it could call and pay off the 1993A Series bonds saving substantial amounts for the airline carriers. Revenue from the passenger facility charge can be used to repay the bonds. Since the airline carriers reimburse the Department of Airports for actual costs including debt payments, the Department has been able to reduce airline rents and landing fees by about 8%. Landing fees are proposed to decrease from $1.23 to $0.89 per thousand pounds of weight. Terminal Unit 1 rents are proposed to decrease from $62.92 per square foot to $56.16, while Terminal Unit 2 rents are proposed to increase from $68.78 per square foot to $72.70. Average total cost to the airlines (rents and landing fees) per enplaned passenger is proposed to decrease from $4.26 to $3.76. The Council may wish to ask representatives of the Airport about the other potential uses for the passenger facility charge funds to get an understanding of any opportunities that could be lost due to this approach. • Number of passengers -A down economy resulting in less business travel is one of the primary factors impacting passenger volumes. Total passengers decreased from a high of 21,280,800 in fiscal year 1996-97 to 18,372,400 in fiscal year 2001-02. The Department of Airports projects a flat trend in passenger volumes for fiscal year 2003-04 based on fiscal year 2002-03 forecast of 18,396,000. • Operating expense increase - Operating expenses are proposed to increase by $3,107,100 over the fiscal year 2003 budget. Most of the increase is attributable to salary increases. The Airport employs 575 employees. The budget assumes the pay increases that are included in multiyear contracts with labor unions and a 3% general pay increase for unrepresented employees. This was the Department's assumption, but it will implement whatever pay levels are actually adopted by the City Council. If a salary increase is not adopted or if a lesser amount is approved, airline rents and fees will be adjusted downward accordingly. Pension and health insurance premiums are increasing for all City employees. The pension plan for airport police officers is proposed to be converted from a 30- year plan to a 20-year plan to be consistent with City police officers. This change will increase costs for the Department of Airports. The proposed budget does not include requests for additional personnel. Last fall, six public information officer positions were transferred from the Public Information 8s Marketing Division to the Operations Division to respond to passengers' needs in the terminal, to provide escorting of contractors on the airfield, and to provide assistance in the parking lots and roadways. In the past, the public information officers staffed an information booth in Terminal Unit 1 84 2 and conducted tours of the Airport for youth groups and others. The Council may wish to ask whether the increased amount of staffing for these functions has proved necessary or whether it could be reduced for the coming year. • The Department of Airports reimburses the general fund for central services including accounting, payroll, purchasing, human resource management, legal, cash management, Mayor, and City Council. The proposed budget contains an increase of about 3% to pay the general fund for these services. 3 • Airline use agreement-The airline use agreement with the carriers will expire on • June 30, 2003. The Department of Airports plans to extend agreements on a year-to-year basis or on terms as negotiated by the Department. A long-term agreement will be important when the Department begins construction of the new terminal or makes other long-term financial decisions. • Capital improvement projects relating to new terminal-A$28.8 million project is proposed relating to the second phase of a $60 million project to reconfigure the access road to service the future terminal location. Parking and rental car fees are considered the funding source for these roadway improvements. The Department's budget booklet explains that the new terminal facilities have been reprogrammed and are ready for design when passenger traffic recovers and _ airline financial stability allow for a prudent development of new facilities. The roadway redesign will also allow for future light rail access to the terminal. The Council may wish to discuss the potential timing of the new development program with representatives of the Department of Airports. • Capital improvement projects to existing terminal and concourses - Several major modifications and upgrades to the existing facilities are proposed including a $35 million project to install baggage explosive detection system equipment in- line with the airline baggage systems. The project will also expand the passenger circulation areas at the ticket counters and add permanent bag screening facilities along the terminal road for passengers using skycap services. Another project will reconfigure the bag claim areas in both terminals at a cost of $6.6 • million. A $1.6 million project will replace exterior metal panels of Concourse D and the exterior panels on the connector between Concourses B and C. The membrane on the roof of Terminal Unit 2 will be replaced at a cost of $0.7 million. Now that the new terminal has been delayed, the Department is requesting some needed improvements to the existing facilities. The Council may wish to ask about the investment amortization period of these improvements and about the level of support of the airlines regarding the proposed improvements. • Capital improvement projects relating to general aviation - The Department of Airports continues to develop Airport II and Tooele Valley airports. Improvements at these two airports will help to encourage flight training schools and general aviation to use these alternative airports reducing the overcrowding of the airspace around Salt Lake City International Airport. • 4 Observations -Review of Budget Detail • Council staff reviewed the budget detail for revenue and expenses and met with Department representatives to obtain explanations of differences between fiscal year 2003 budget and the proposed budget. Fiscal year 2002 actual expenses and projected fiscal year 2003 expenses were also compared to the proposed budget. The Council may wish to obtain additional explanations from Department representatives regarding the proposed budget. Council staffs understanding is that if the Council chooses to decrease some of the proposed operating expense budgets, landing fees and rents paid by the airlines would also be adjusted since the formula setting fees and rents depends initially on operating budgets and is later adjusted for actual costs. The Council may wish to discuss this understanding with representatives of the Airport. • Auto parking revenue - Revenue from auto parking is estimated to decrease from - the fiscal year 2003 budget by $3,126,300. Prior to September 11th, those accompanying passengers to the airport or those greeting passengers would sometimes park and spend time with the passengers in the concourses. Now more passengers are just dropped off or picked up within the 30-minute free parking time since the concourses are limited to ticketed passengers. • Car rental revenue - Revenue from car rental agencies is estimated to decrease from the fiscal year 2003 budget by $1,271,900. The Department believes that this decrease is due to less business travel. • • Fuel farm lease-Revenue from the lease of the refueling operation is proposed to decrease from $1,005,400 to $766,300. Some of the Airport's investment in the • fuel farm is now fully amortized allowing base lease rates to decrease. Actual fuel use has decreased because of more efficient regional jets and fewer flights. • State aviation fuel tax - Revenue from a state aviation fuel tax is estimated to decrease from the fiscal year 2003 budget by$29,500 because of less demand for aviation fuel (e.g., smaller planes, fewer flights). • Aircraft rescue fire fighting (ARFF) training revenue - Several years ago, the Department of Airports received a grant to build an aircraft firefighting training facility. Training fees from other airports reimburse the Salt Lake City's Department of Airport for operating costs. The Department projects a 1.6% increase in revenue. • Extraordinary service charge revenue - Sometimes an airline will request a facility modification that will be accomplished under a separate agreement rather than incorporating the costs in the overall use agreement that involves other airlines. Revenue from these separate agreements is expected to decrease $13,000. • Operations Division expenses-Expenses of the Operations Division are proposed to increase by 14.8% over the budget for fiscal year 2003. The proposed budget includes the full-year costs of 11 positions authorized in a November 2002 budget amendment for security at terminal screening areas to be reimbursed by the-Transportation Security Administration. The Operations Division picked up 6- +111 positions from the Public Relations tis Marketing Division relating to the public information officers previously mentioned. The Department is also budgeting for a change in retirement plans for airport police officers from a 30-year retirement plan to a 20-year retirement plan similar to the City's police officers. 5 • Commercial Services Division expenses - Expenses of the Commercial Services Division are proposed to increase by $381,100 over the budget for fiscal year 2003. This is primarily due to a $300,000 increase to liability and property • insurance costs. Other requested increases are $40,000 for contractual services, $27,000 for data processing services, and $10,000 for communication equipment. • Planning and Environmental Services Division expenses - Expenses of the Planning and Programming Division are proposed to increase by $564,100 over the budget for fiscal year 2003. The budget proposes a $399,500 increase in professional services for studies of the Federal Aviation Administration's proposal regarding airline flights over Salt Lake City (Northern Utah Airspace Initiative). The budget also includes $151,400 in utility charges relating to the deicing recycling plant that is expected to become operational in the next few months. The Airport is being required to remove the deicing chemicals before disposing water into the stormwater system. The recycled glycol can be sold for processing and reuse. • Public Relations 85 Marketing Division expenses - Expenses of the Public Relations 8a Marketing Division are proposed to decrease by $1,336,600 over the budget for fiscal year 2003. In the past two years, the Department has budgeted $1,000,000 that could be used as incentives in cooperative advertising and promotion to help market new international service if an airline carrier qualifies for the incentive by opening a new international non-stop route. The proposed budget doesn't specifically budget for this incentive. The Department plans to use a portion of the $2,000,000 economic development reserve budgeted under capital projects for tenant requests (see page 9) if an airline carrier qualifies for • the international service incentive. Some savings in the Public Relations 85 Marketing Division are the result of combining two divisions and eliminating one division director position. • Administration Division expenses - Expenses of the Administration Division are proposed to increase by $85,400 over the budget for fiscal year 2003. Part of the increase is due to splitting out travel expenses to each division rather than budgeting all travel in the Finance Division. The budget for travel in the Administration Division is proposed to be $62,300. • Operation supplies for computerized access security system (CASS) - The proposed budget in the Operating Division includes an increase in supplies for CASS from $38,500 to $66,300. Airport representatives explained that the increase is primarily due to additional fingerprinting and security supplies as a result of increased security measures. • Police supplies - The proposed budget in the Operating Division includes an increase in police supplies from $14,100 to $42,500. This budget is for a one- time upgrade of police officer equipment. • Carpentry supplies - The proposed budget in the Maintenance Division includes an increase in carpentry supplies from $50,600 to $66,600. Actual expenses in fiscal year 2002 were $38,400. Now that the timing for constructing a new terminal is further in the future, the budget proposes more durable maintenance to the existing terminals rather than just a temporary approach. 41111 6 • Traffic signs and signals - The proposed budget in the Maintenance Division includes an increase in traffic signs and signals from $43,000 to $88,800. The budget proposes a one-time maintenance project to upgrade the roadway signage including signage in front of the terminals. • Natural gas - The proposed budget in the Maintenance Division includes an increase in natural gas expense from $550,000 to $665,000 to reflect rate increases. Actual expenses in fiscal year 2002 were $613,600, and projected expenses for fiscal year 2003 are $656,700. • Water - The proposed budget for water includes only a 7% increase from $448,500 to $479,900. The Department is planning to conserve water this summer by updating irrigation systems and by altering some of the landscaping. • Cell phones - The proposed budget for cell phone expense contains an increase from $37,400 to $63,200. Security personnel are now carrying cell phones in • addition to radios for redundancy. • Maintenance and janitorial service contracts - The proposed budget in the Maintenance Division includes a 9.4% increase in janitorial service contracts from $5,793,800 to$6,336,000. The proposed budget includes 13.7%increase in maintenance service contracts from $452,700 to 514,700. The contracts reflect increased costs that the contractor's pay to their employees for salaries and benefits. No additional workers are included in the maintenance and janitorial contracts. • Hazardous waste disposal-The proposed budget in the Planning&Programming Division includes an increase in hazardous waste disposal from $50,000 to $52,500. Actual expenses in fiscal year 2002 were $11,100. The budget includes a hazardous waste contingency in the event of the need for clean-up action. If the contingency is not needed, actual costs that go into the formula for determining airline rents and landing fees will result in slightly lower rents and fees. • Meal expense -The proposed budget for meal expense contains an increase from $22,600 to $42,800. Actual expenses for fiscal year 2002 were $28,000. The Administration's gift policy doesn't allow a vendor or visiting official to pay for a business lunch for a City employee. The policy doesn't prevent the Airport from paying for business lunches. The Department is budgeting for the full meal cost of all participants when business is conducted over lunch, etc. • Membership assessments - The proposed budget in the Finance Division includes an increase in membership assessments from $89,600 to $136,100. Projected expenses for fiscal year 2003 are $111,000. The Airport Council International is the primary membership. This worldwide organization provides lobbying, educational training, periodicals, bulletins, and other services relating to the airport industry. • Travel, conferences, seminars - The proposed budget for travel expense contains an increase from $276,200 to $367,800. Projected expenses for fiscal year 2003 are $263,900. Department management emphasizes specialized training, which 411 is usually not available locally. A detail listing of each anticipated meeting or conference is listed on pages 15-18 of the Department's budget booklet. 7 • Employee cost incentives - The proposed budget in the Operating Division contains an increase in employee cost incentives from $3,800 to $6,200. The . budget is for the "always challenge everyone" program where small incentives, such as a free meal coupon, are provided to tenant employees and Airport employees that challenge someone whose identification badge is not readily visible. The budget is for the second year of the program. • Property and liability insurance - The proposed budget in the Commercial Services Division includes a 30% increase in insurance costs from $986,300 to $1,285,900. Actual expenses in fiscal year 2002 were $789,800. The cost for insurance is significantly increasing as a result of September 1 ith. • Workers compensation medical costs - The proposed budget in the Finance Division contains an increase in workers compensation payments for medical - costs from $99,000 to $127,400. Actual expenses in fiscal year 2002 were $87,100. The Controller's Office provides projections of workers compensation costs to each department for budgeting purposes. The Department of Airports is budgeting for workers compensation based on information provided. PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY AND DEBT SERVICE BUDGET The budget for capital outlay and debt service for the Department of Airports is proposed to increase by $77,958,700 over the 2002-2003 budget. Early retirement of bonds accounts for $46,799,200 of the increase. The funding sources and the proposed capital budget for fiscal years 2003-2004 are as follows: • DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS PROPOSED CAPITAL BUDGET Adopted =_ Percent 2002-2003 = .__ Difference Change Sources of funds " _-=- --- ----- Revenue from operations $ 31,890,300 _ . $(12,457,500) (39.1%) Use of passenger facility 37,694,000 , 71,565,000 189.9% charge(PFC)revenue _ __-_ Federal grants 34,225,500 _-_-,__Iftorsirxr 21,851,200 63.8% Interest income 4,000,000 _;':;____ _ (3,000,000) (75.0%) Total funds available $107,809,800 2 ._.= 0= $77,958,700 72.3% * nxz z .. Capital outlay&debt service - :_ Capital improvements $ 78,065,100 1-,=a1499ti $44,093,300 56.5% Equipment 2,091,900 _m__ '_ _ _; 3,729,300 178.3% Early retirement of bonds =_ 46,799,200 Debt service 13,347,700 7 9 (3,619,900) (27.1%) Increase to reserves 14,305,100 -__ _ (13,043,200) (91.2%) Total capital outlay,debt .--:::.. service 8z increased reserves $107,809,800 $1�7 $77,958,700 72.3% • The following table summarizes the proposed capital improvement projects for fiscal 411 year 2003-04. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROPOSED PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 Pe :projest- tam _;_i' s: a ,4 w: .,-:"F'" ...., ., ,,< ws p.$i , { ' £, 'sW, '.r ., ., .lax v V.v ry S. v .. �' _ �'k• �.i` .,�F«F .+i.�.' ., .P.ix. �.Sti da`v„_ .,,,,,„ ,ar,rz Projects in progress Re-appropriation of remaining budgets Crossbar Relocation and Rental Car Access Road—first phase of $ 1,065,500 $ 5,000,000 project to reconfigure the access road to service future terminal location Terminal Roadway Security Improvements Phase II—widen sidewalks 3,687,000 next to public unload lanes in front of terminals Taxiway H Rehabilitation—taxiway is rutting and cracking 277,000 $ 2,142,000 Taxiway P Extension—to improve airport capacity 230,000 2,070,000 East Apron Rehabilitation Phase It—strengthen for larger aircraft 140,000 1,260,000 Perimeter Patrol Road Phase I—pave existing or construct new roads 498,400 901,600 Airport II—Runway 16/34 Overlay—resurfacing will extend pavement life 100,000 900,000 Runway 16L-34R Storm Drain Improvements—fix flooding conditions 83,600 752,000 Security Equipment Detection Modifications—security cameras,motion 725,400 sensors,security stations,expand control center Concourse A Apron Reconstruction Phase I—replace pavement 264,000 336,000 Tooele—Automated Weather Observing System&Taxilane— step 32,700 294,200 toward future instrument landing system;taxilane for future growth Security Gate Modifications—includes asphalt paving,fence relocation, 200,000 hardware,software,modifications to electrical/communications systems Triturator Grinder Replacement—replace sewage dump stations 130,000 • Car Rental Lobby Expansion Phase II—expand from 6 to 10 agencies 100,000 Proposed New Projects Terminal Modifications—increase passenger circulation areas at ticket counters;add centralized bag screening facilities and conveyor systems; 3,500,000 31,500,000 install permanent bag screening along the terminal road for skycaps Landside Road Reconfiguration(West)—second phase of project to reconfigure the access road to service future terminal location 19,447,100 9,363,900 Runway 16U34R Overlay—repair rutted and uneven surface 1,436,600 5,461,400 Bag Claim Modifications—reconfigure of bag claim devices 6,601,000 East Apron Rehabilitation Phase III—replace pavement 718,600 2,839;400 Land Acquisition Phase II(Noise/Approach Protection)—In the event property owners north of runway desire to sell 250,000 2,418,000 Taxiway H Pavement Reconstruction—taxiway is deteriorating 528,700 2,038,300 Tooele Land Acquisition—establish runway protection zones 591,000 1,585,000 Airport Property Security Fencing Phase I—including TV cameras and automated security gates 2,049,000 Exterior Metal Wall Panel Replacement—Concourse D&Connector B/C 1,608,000 Concourse A Apron Reconstruction Phase II—replace pavement 288,700 1,216,300 Perimeter Patrol Road Phase II—pave existing or construct new roads 1,222,000 Terminal Unit 2 Roof Replacements—there is possibility of roof failure 714,000 North Support Tunnel Road Rehabilitation—repair pavement 497,000 Lighting Upgrade—baggage handling rooms and Concourses A&B aprons 436,000 East Side Oil/Water Separator—stormwater automated separator 411,000 Airport Layout Plan/Environmental Update Phase I—support for the 37,500 362,500 Airport's development program and for obtaining federal grants Airport Wide Fire Alarm System Integration—upgrade existing systems 348,000 Contingencies Economic Development Reserve Used—Tenant requests or other 2,000,000 economic development projects that may require quick action to accomplish. ill Capital Improvement Program Committee Reserve-Unanticipated 1� ,� project costs due to field conditions or other unexpected circumstances. Total Capital Improvement Program Fiscal year 2003-2004 $27,348,600 $38,733,100 $56,076,700 9 Capital Improvement Program - The proposed budget includes $122,158,400 for capital improvement projects for fiscal year 2003-04. Some of these projects are contingent upon funding from the Federal Aviation Administration. Grant funded 11111 projects will not be started before the grants are awarded. The Airport can assess a passenger facility charge as long as a capital-improvement need can be shown. Capital improvement projects must meet certain criteria to be eligible to be funded with passenger facility charge revenue. The Airport currently charges $4.50 per enplaned passenger. For the past several years, the Department of Airports budgeted $1,500,000 for capital improvement reserves for unanticipated project costs and $2,000,000 for economic development reserves for tenant requests that may require quick action. The Department of Airports is again requesting these contingencies to allow the Airport to respond quickly to changing demands of Airport tenants. Equipment replacement - Capital equipment requests are based on a 5 to 10-year replacement schedule. Page 20 of the Department's budget booklet contained a detailed schedule of equipment proposed for replacement. The Department proposes to fund 81% of the equipment through passenger facility charge revenue or federal grants. Additional Information BACKGROUND • The Salt Lake International Airport is operated and managed by the Salt Lake City Department of Airports, a department of Salt Lake City. The airfield consists of three air carrier runways and a general aviation runway. There are two terminals, five concourses and 71 aircraft gates. The department also operates Tooele Valley Airport and Airport II in West Jordan. These two airports are general aviation/reliever facilities. The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City requiring no funding from property taxes or appropriations from the City's general fund. Capital requirements are met from earned surpluses, revenue bonds, passenger facility charges and Federal Aviation Administration grants under the Airport Improvement Program. The Airport Board is a nine-member advisory board of citizen volunteers that gives advice and makes recommendations to management of the Department of Airports and to the Mayor and City Council regarding the affairs of the airport. The Mayor, each City Council Member, the Director of Airports, the City Attorney and the City Engineer, or their designees, are ex officio nonvoting board members. The Board may designate subcommittees as it desires to study, consider and make recommendations on matters that are presented to the -Board. - • 10 FIVE-YEAR BUSINESS PLAN (Goals and measurable results) • The Department of Airports prepared a five-year business plan in fiscal year 2000-01 to help guide the budgeting process and provide a means for management to better evaluate overall Department performance. The business plan identifies goals and objectives of the Department of Airports for five fiscal years. In order to assist the Council in evaluating progress, Council staff summarized the goals and noted the results or steps taken by the Department during the first two years of the plan. These goals were set prior to the changes in the industry as a result of September 11, 2001. 1. Goal/Objective: Generate earnings of at least $125 million over five years for capital development programs. Results/steps taken: As of fiscal year 2002, Airport reserves for capital development were at $102 million and projected to be at about $126 million by the end of fiscal year 2004. 2. Goal/Objective: Implement the Development Program. Results/steps taken: The roadway component of the Development Program is being implemented with the first contract awarded in fiscal year 2003. Phase II will begin in fiscal year 2004, and Phase III will be completed in fiscal year 2005. New terminal facilities have been reprogrammed and are ready for • design when traffic recovers and airline fmancial stability allow for a prudent development. 3. Goal/Objective: Implement the Information Technology Master Plan. Results/steps taken: The Information Technology Master Plan was developed in conjunction with the Development Program; therefore its implementation is also dependent on the schedule of the Development Program. 4. Goal/Objective: Expand international air service. Results/steps taken: AeroMexico started providing four weekly direct flights to Mexico beginning in December 2001. 5. Goal/Objective: Prepare and deliver a minimum of 20 presentations, route proposals, and hub analyses to air carriers over a 24-month period. Results/steps taken: Prior to September 11, seven route proposals were presented. Three were delivered after September 11, 2001. 6. Goal/Objective: Customer satisfaction survey results will meet or exceed . 80%. Results/steps taken: Due to the events of September 11th, this goal was not undertaken. 11 • 7. Goal/Objective: Develop airport-wide customer service and safety awareness. Results/steps taken: An on-going customer service training program has ` trained 100% of the Department's employees and some tenant employees. A recurrent training on customer service is also in-place with training conducted on a regular schedule. • 8. Goal/Objective: Maintain an investment grade revenue bond rating. Results/steps taken: The Airports'last bond issue, Series 2001, was rated by Moody's as "Aa1/VMIG-1", while Standard & Poor's gave a rating of"AA+/A- 1+" based on the letter of credit provided by the German financial institution, WestLB. 9. Goal/Objective: Establish baseline/benchmark customer awareness data to measure effectiveness of advertising campaign. Results/steps taken: As a result of the events of September 11th, this goal was deferred to future years. 10. Goal/Objective: Maximize airfield capacity 95% of the time within compliance and operating guidelines. Results/steps taken: Airfield capacity was maintained at 99.99% of the time within compliance. • 11. Goal/Objective: Complete customer service development and training plans within the five-year planning period. Results/steps taken: Customer service programs designed for the 2002 Winter Olympics were implemented successfully. An on-going customer service training and recurrent training program is on-going. 12. Goal/Objective: Complete training needs analyses and implement results. Results/steps taken: Employee performance management using the City- wide Performance Impact software has been implemented with all employees and department management trained to its processes. Training needs analyses and its implementation will be part of the employees' semi-annual performance review cycle. 13. Goal/Objective: Survey ratings of employee job satisfaction are to be within 80%. Results/steps taken: The Department of Airports participated in the fiscal year 2003 employee survey conducted by the City. The Department results indicate that the Airport's employee job satisfaction is within 80%. 11/ 12 LEGISLATIVE INTENT STATEMENTS • No legislative intent statements are outstanding for the Department of Airports. During the briefing on the proposed budget, the Council may wish to identify legislative intents relating to the Department of Airports. 13 SALT LAKE Ross C."Rocky"Anderson Alayor CITY DEPARTMENT Timothy L.Campbell, A.A.E. OFE AI RPORTS Executive Director Salt Lake City Department of Airports AMF Box 22084 Salt Lake City,UT 84122 Tel 80 I.575.2400 COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL Fax 801.575.2679 TO: Rocky J. FluhartT-7011-2, DATE: April 17, 2003 Chief Administrative Officer FROM: Timothy L. Campbell SUBJECT: Department of Airports FY 2004 Budget STAFF CONTACT: Jay C. Bingham DOCUMENT TYPE: City Council Budget Briefing RECOMMENDATION: We recommend adoption of the Department of Airports FY 2004 budget with the • City's budget. BUDGET IMPACT: FY 2004 operating revenues will decrease $5.2 million from projected FY 2003 to $85, 014,400. This is a result of reduced airline revenues due to the calling of the 1993A General Airport Revenue Bond (GARB). Other revenues are projected to remain unchanged from FY 2003 as the airline industry is projected to continue to struggle. Operating expenses will increase by $4 million over projected FY 2003 to $65,58],600. This increase is attributable to increases in salary and benefit costs. No new personnel are requested for FY 2004. Capital expenditures for FY 2004 are estimated to be $122,158,400. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The FY 2004 budget provides positive financial benefits which include: • reducing airline rates at a time of financial hardship for the airlines • funding important capital projects which will improve airport safety and security, address customer service needs, maintain ageing facilities, and create jobs and economic stimulus to the local construction and consulting industry • reducing airport debt by 46%. PUBLIC PROCESS: • The budget was reviewed in detail at meetings with the Board Finance Committee on February 7 and airline representatives on March 4. The Airport Advisory Board approved this budget during its regular meeting on March 19, 2003. RECYCLED PAPER SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF 4:1 -.Aimc)RTs BUDGET REQUEST for FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 • SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS PROPOSED BUDGET FY 2003/2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Budget Message Projected Operating Statement 1 Operating Revenues 2 Operating Expenses 3 Organizational Chart 8 • Staffing Document 9 Travel Budget 15 Sources and Uses of Funds 19 Capital Equipment 20 Capital Improvement Project Summaries 21 Capital Improvement Project Descriptions 24 Cash Flow Analysis 58 • Graphical Presentation of Statistics 61 SALT LAKE Ross C."Rocky"Anderson Mayor CITY DEPARTMENT Timothy L. Campbell,A.A.E. OF AIRPORTS Executive Director Salt Lake City Department of Airports AMF Box 22084 Salt Lake City,LIT 84122 Tel 801.575.2400 Fax 801.575.2679 Fiscal Year 2004 Budget Message MARCH 19, 2003 The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of the Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any general fund revenues to support the operation of the airport system. The Department of Airports employs 575 employees and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services. These facilities and services promote economic development for all Utahns by providing business and leisure travelers' access to domestic and international destinations. Economic Impact The airports and the services they provide are an engine for economic growth for Salt Lake City and the State of Utah. The combined impact of operating and capital expenditures accounts for over 22,000 jobs with household earnings of$626 million per year generating tax revenue of$73.5 million per year. The impact of operating and capital expenditures ranks the Salt Lake City International Airport as one of Utah's largest industries and the 4th largest employment site in Utah. The Department's capital program for the last five years averaged$46 million, a significant contribution to the local economy. The FY 04 capital budget exceeds $122 million. Safety and Security The FY 04 Budget proposes a major upgrade in the airport security system to ensure compliance with federal mandates and increase the security of our customers. The FY 04 budget includes funding to transition from the security equipment installed in the ticket lobby to placing it"inline"with the airline's baggage system to improve customer service and increase utilization of expensive Explosive Detection System(EDS) equipment. We will also increase perimeter security with additional security fencing for all airport property. Integration of the airport fire alarm system will improve response time in the event of an emergency. Improvements to the airfield are designed to ensure the safe operation of aircraft as well as preserve these valuable assets. A major overlay of the center runway is planned in FY 04, as well as apron and taxiway capital projects. i ,ECYCLED PAPER Improvements to the terminal roadway will also improve safety and the traffic flow on airport roadways. We began the first phase of the improvements to the terminal roadways in FY 03. FY 04 will continue that program. The Department's safety incentive program has reduced on the job injuries. The reduction in lost time and the resulting increase in productivity are additional benefits of keeping our employees healthy, safe, and secure. Development Program The next three years will see the construction of the landside elements of the Master Plan. The project will be constructed over three years for approximately $60 million. The funds come from revenues from parking and rental car rents and fees not airline funds. A down economy and financial weakness of most airlines have resulted in declining passenger volumes. New terminal facilities have been reprogrammed and are ready for design when traffic recovers and airline financial stability allow for a prudent development of new facilities. The FY 04 budget proposes modifications to existing terminals related to the inline EDS installation and upgrades to the baggage claim devices to address constraints in the existing terminals. Additional space for"meeters and greeters"is a major goal of the building modifications. Several terminal projects address aging facilities such as ' replacing the Terminal 2 roof,replacing exterior wall panels, and upgrading the lighting. Air Service and Marketing We continue to focus our air service marketing on supporting existing carriers and aiding new service through joint marketing and promotion. Our efforts in establishing a Mexican Marketing Coalition are paying dividends with increased travel between Utah and Mexico. The FY 04 budget is designed to sustain these efforts. General Aviation We continue to develop Airport II and Tooele Valley Airports to serve our general aviation customers. Tooele Valley continues to receive extensive capital funding as it is updated to better accommodate additional activity. The General Aviation advisory group continues to provide ongoing review and feedback for the Department of Airports as we develop our general aviation facilities. Financial summary FY 04 operating revenues will decrease$5.2 million from projected FY 2003 to $85,014,400. This is a result of reduced airline revenues due to the calling of the 1993A General Airport Revenue Bond(GARB). Other revenues are projected to remain unchanged from FY 03 as the airline industry is projected to continue to struggle. ii Operating expenses will increase by $4 million over projected FY 2003 to $65,581,600. This increase is attributable to increases in salary and benefit costs. No new personnel are requested for FY 04. Interest income will decrease due to low interest rates on airport reserves. Debt service payments will decrease from $13,480,400 in FY 2003 to $9,727,800 in FY 2004. The budget reflects the calling of the 1993A and 1993H bonds for a reduction of General Airport Revenue Bond(GARB) debt of$44.2 million. Total Airport debt at the end of FY 2004 will be $62.7 million. Conclusion The FY 2004 budget provides positive financial benefits which include: reducing airline rates at a time of financial hardship for the airlines; funding important capital projects which will improve airport safety and security, address customer service needs, maintain ageing facilities, and create jobs and economic stimulus to the local construction and consulting industry; and reducing airport debt by 46%. Respectfully submitted, Timothy L. Campbell, A.A.E. Executive Director SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS fr PROJECTED OPERATING STATEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,2003 and JUNE 30,2004 FY0 /03 .:110.3 : : i03104: :Aimed .d . . . P o t*•::: D sri ti`ori Bii...-.et tctual:: : -# ites :i:i::: Operating Revenue $93,755,300 $90,219,200 $85,014,400 Operating Expense 62,474,500 61,597,600 65,581,600 Operating Income 31,280,800 28,621,600 19,432,800 Other Source&Revenues Interest Income 4,000,000 2,500,000 1,000,000 Federal Grants for Capital Projects 27,468,000 2,274,000 56,076,700 PFC Revenues for Capital Projects 37,694,000 32,137,000 109,259,000 Total Other Source& Revenues 69,162,000 36,911,000 166,335,700 Total Revenues 100,442,800 65,532,600 185,768,500 Total Debt Service 13,347,700 13,480,400 9,727,800 Reserves Available 87,095,100 52,052,200 176,040,700 Use of Airport Capital Funds Capital Projects and Equipment 80,157,000 26,801,000 127,979,600 Increase to O&M Reserves 800,000 800,000 800,000 Buyout of Swap & Bonds 0 848,000 46,799,200 Total Use of Funds 80,957,000 28,449,000 175,578,800 .......... ... .. ....... ................................. ..... ...... ... . :wet:Air.Pi ii::: -irves ::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::: ::::.:::::::::: :$6;1: 8 t00::::::::::.................................................... BUDGET IMPACT ON TERMINAL RENTS AND LANDING FEES Aeti 04::: P.roe:cted: ::::: : :Bud a ::::, :Deac ptFzin::: : ::: :::: ::: :: ::::::: : ::: :::::::: :*Y..'1102.. .........Ytii10 ..........t=Y.#13F04:::: Terminal Rents Terminal Unit 1 $66.06 $62.92 $56.16 Terminal Unit 2 66.82 68.78 72.70 Landing Fees 1.07 1.23 0.89 Cost per enplaned passenger $4.02 $4.26 $3.76 1 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS fr COMPARISON OF FY 2002/2003 BUDGETED AND PROJECTED REVENUES TO FY 2003/2004 BUDGETED REVENUES :::::a=. 3/ 4;::: quesd : :: men dedi : P: rojected :: ::::: :::::::::::::: : :::::::::::: ::: :: : : ::::::.. R ..eq......te.. .:. Budget:::: :: :::A0itOaj.:..... . . Descripfian ..... . .:.......:.... .:.:: Budget::::::.: Landing Fees $16,366,900 $16,616,000 Scheduled Airlines $12,018,000 122,400 110,100 Charters/Commuters 81,400 1,315,900 1,375,400 Cargo 1,030,900 17,805,200 18,101,500 Total Landing Fees 13,130,300 1,005,400 1,004,900 Fuel Farm 766,300 469,200 456,000 Extraordinary Service Charges 456,200 586,300 386,300 Cargo Ramp Use Fee 267,000 52,500 60,000 International Facility Use Fee 60,000 211,200 211,200 Passenger Paging Fee 198,000 365,600 316,200 Tenant Telephone Fees 329,200 7,640,600 7,445,200 Airline Terminal Rents-TU#1 6,686,800 16,831,900 16,235,200 Airline Terminal Rents -TU#2 17,056,100 61,100 78,500 Executive Terminal 81,200 828,200 827,800 General Aviation Hangars 833,200 0 87,100 87,100 FBO Hangars 87,300 1,333,700 1,326,200 Cargo Buildings 1,172,600 1,003,300 1,140,200 Flight Kitchen 1,140,200 3,785,700 3,776,500 Other Buildings 3,782,100 219,400 461,900 Office Space 497,400 2,033,300 2,266,800 Food Service 2,309,000 320,600 348,600 Vending 358,700 231,100 241,900 Public Telephone Revenue 200,000 3,282,200 3,254,700 News &Gifts 3,379,400 9,350,400 8,050,200 Car Rental Commissions 7,921,300 1,379,100 1,536,600 Car Rental -Fixed Rents 1,536,300 1,252,100 1,257,600 Leased Site Areas 1,287,800 17,435,500 14,580,500 Auto Parking 14,309,200 458,700 537,000 Ground Transportation 588,700 457,000 442,100 ARFF Training Revenue 464,200 1,704,200 1,756,600 Advertising Media Fees 2,134,600 304,400 856,200 Security Charges to Airlines 854,100 2,358,500 2,329,000 State Aviation Fuel Tax 2,329,000 338,700 376,100 Fuel Oil Royalties 374,900 110,500 110,500 Military 110,500 452,600 360,100 Other 312,800 : :..9 .i.755 3f1Q: :$9Q 2'F9 20Q:::::::7-oja1:0.eratii :Reuen iP: i:.::::i: $85 0'14 4Q0:: 10 2 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS COMPARISON OF FY 2002/2003 BUDGET AND PROJECTED ACTUAL EXPENSES TO FY 2003/2004 BUDGET EXPENSES .................................................... ............... ..................................................... Amended ...... ......................... .... © scri fort :::::Bu i .... : : ::::::::::::: :Actua.. ......... .. e.....p. �....... Salaries and Fringe Benefits $10,397,800 $10,033,200 Supervisory and Professional $10,912,600 11,776,000 11,722,100 Operating and Maintenance 12,993,500 1,784,400 1,644,100 Clerical and Technical 1,748,200 237,100 222,100 Hourly and Seasonal 131,100 54,100 54,100 Uniform and Tool Allowance 56,100 1,700,500 1,652,300 FICA 1,786,300 2,155,100 2,745,700 State Retirement 2,940,800 3,289,200 3,099,500 Health Insurance 3,435,800 31,394,200 31,173,100 Total Salaries and Benefits 34,004,400 Materials and Supplies 45,500 40,700 Books, References and Periodicals 41,700 124,400 104,800 Office Materials and Supplies 126,800 40,800 35,400 Copy Center Charges 35,900 29,400 21,400 Postage 29,700 390,000 584,500 Computer Software and Supplies 390,000 ' 153,500 285,700 Security System Supplies 181,300 255,000 255,000 Gasoline and Oil 255,000 130,000 140,000 Compressed Natural Gas 140,000 86,600 86,600 Other Fuel 103,400 75,000 75,000 Tires and Tubes 75,000 500,000 500,000 Motive Equipment and Supplies 510,000 477,200 487,100 Communication Equipment and Supplies 335,400 56,100 56,800 Special Clothing and Supplies- Fire& Police 88,000 326,300 326,300 Paint and Painting Supplies 343,900 461,800 462,100 Construction Materials and Supplies 476,000 148,000 148,200 Electrical Supplies 158,000 483,000 483,000 Road and Runway Supplies 467,000 642,700 647,500 Janitorial Supplies 639,100 192,600 216,100 Laundry and Linen Supplies 187,900 126,000 121,000 Grounds Supplies 121,000 226,900 229,700 Mechanical Systems Supplies 202,500 43,000 43,100 Signage Materials and Supplies 88,800 409,100 417,800 Chemicals and Salt 419,900 83,200 82,700 Safety Equipment 87,200 34,400 30,500 Licenses,Tags and Certificates 38,300 296,000 420,800 Small Tools and Equipment 333,000 137,700 135,700 Other Material and Supplies 137,800 5,974,200 6,437,500 Total Materials and Supplies 6,012,600 3 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS COMPARISON OF FY 2002/2003 BUDGET AND PROJECTED ACTUAL EXPENSES TO FY 2003/2004 BUDGET EXPENSES FY02/03: FY:02/03: FY.0 /04::.:.:.. ......................... ............................................... ...... ............................... .......... Pro ected>:::::::>:>:::;>: ,>:.::.: Descri tiort: Bud et::::: ........................... ................ :;::<:>:�:::;: ::ActuaL:�::�:>:�:........�..p..... ,.....�.. .. ... .........�.... ...... .... .....t�..... .. Services 43,200 51,200 Auditing Fees 53,900 325,000 156,900 Legal Fees 310,000 729,500 478,200 Public Relations 332,500 2,497,100 1,195,800 Other Professional and Technical Services 2,085,200 2,508,600 2,505,100 Electrical Power 2,574,000 550,000 656,700 Natural Gas 694,000 448,500 475,700 Water 479,900 231,800 231,800 Telephone 231,800 67,700 71,300 Other Communication Expense 91,200 100,000 123,500 Office Equipment Maintenance Contracts 131,800 146,200 145,900 Communication Equip't. Maint. Contracts 146,900 40,000 80,000 Electrical Maintenance Contracts 70,000 88,000 88,000 Motive Equipment Maintenance Contracts 94,500 5,793,800 5,839,200 Janitorial Service Maintenance Contracts 6,336,000 452,700 452,700 Building Maintenance Contracts 514,700 40,000 40,000 Ground Maintenance Contracts 20,000 29,000 27,100 Other Maintenance Contracts 29,500 799,100 818,400 Airport Deicing Contract 721,000 42,200 47,000 Printing Charges 50,100 240,900 230,100 Educational Training 261,200 33,200 54,900 Towing Service 30,000 226,600 214,300 Waste Disposal 235,100 1,300,600 1,500,100 Other Contractual Payments 1,153,300 16,733,700 15,483,900 Total Services 16,646,600 Other Operating Expenses 164,700 164,200 Equipment Rental 136,700 22,600 32,700 Meals and Entertainment 42,800 31,200 29,300 Employee Meal Allowance 32,000 119,300 140,200 Memberships 169,200 276,200 263,900 Out-Of-Town Travel 367,800 117,000 107,700 Other Employee Costs 117,700 30,000 120,000 Bad Debts 30,000 300,000 472,900 Property Liability Insurance 600,000 135,300 138,000 Unemployment and Workers Compensation 156,900 41,300 40,000 Occupational Health Clinic Charges 42,400 12,300 12,300 Water Stock Assessments 12,300 40,000 37,500 Air Service Cases 40,000 1,179,300 1,164,500 Airline Rebates 1,164,500 18,300 14,900 Other Expenses 24,300 2,487,500 2,738,100 Total Other Operating Expenses 2,936,600 4 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS COMPARISON OF FY 2002/2003 BUDGET AND PROJECTED ACTUAL EXPENSES TO FY 2003/2004 BUDGET EXPENSES ...FY.(�3IQ4...:.. ended: : : : ::::: :::: :::::::::::::::.: �ro�ec#ed.....:....... :.... . ... Intergovernmental Charges 1,413,700 1,413,700 Administrative Service Fee 1,456,000 200,000 137,000 SLC Police Services 120,000 275,000 275,000 City Data Processing Services 302,000 686,300 629,000 Risk Management Premium 685,900 3,309,900 3.310,300 Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting 3,417,500 5,884,900 5,765,000 Total Intergovernmental Charges 5,981,400 600: 5 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS SUMMARY OF FEES PAID TO SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENTS FY 2002/2003 PROJECTED AND 2003/2004 BUDGET REQUEST .. . . . :::FY m en die.. .......... Prp.jected : Re: udsted::::: ............... . .. . ..u::fget. ...........:.. .1kC't4ai.: ::....:: : .:. :Butiget:::::::: Administrative Service Fees Accounting $162,800 $162,800 $167,700 Payroll 30,100 30,100 31,000 Property Management 4,800 4,800 4,900 Purchasing 320,500 320,500 330,100 Cash Management 42,500 42,500 43,800 Budget and Policy Development 46,000 46,000 47,400 City Recorder 75,100 75,100 77,400 City Attorney 247,000 247,000 254,400 City Council 65,900 65,900 67,900 Mayor 9,300 9,300 9,600 Human Resources 391,500 391,500 403,100 Contracts 18,200 18.200 18.700 Total Administrative 1 Service Fees 1,413,700 1,413,700 1,456,000 Police Services S.L.C. Police Department 200,000 137,000 120,000 Information Management System Services Data Processing Division 275,000 275,000 302,000 Risk Management Administration Fees and Premiums 686,300 629,000 685,900 Aircraft Rescue Fire Fighting S.L.C. Fire Department 3,309,900 3,310,300 3,417,500 ::::::Total:Fees :: : : : : 88z 91)0::::::::::::::::::::::...:: 6 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS PERSONNEL COST EXPENSE ANALYSIS FY 2002/2003 PROJECTED AND FY 2003/2004 BUDGET REQUESTS es flan::�::::::::�::�:::�:::��:::�::::::: p............................$udget�:�::�:�::�:�::�4ctttal Salaries &Benefits Supervisory & Professional $10,397,800 $10,033,200 $10,980,800 $11,329,300 $10,912,600 Operating & Maintenance 11,776,000 11,722,100 12,479,600 12,999,100 12,993,500 Clerical &Technical 1,784,400 1,644,100 1,757,900 1,823,700 1,748,200 Hourly& Seasonal 237,100 222,100 131,100 131,100 131,100 Uniform &Tool Allowance 54,100 54,100 56,100 56,100 56,100 FICA 1,700,500 1,652,300 1,792,500 1,822,600 1,786,300 State Retirement 2,155,100 2,745,700 2,266,200 2,541,800 2,940,800 Health Insurance 3,289,200 3,099,500 3,506,000 3,506,000 3,435,800 Totals $31,394,200 $31,173,100 $32,970,200 $34,209,700 $34,004,400 FY 02/03 Amended Budget -0.70% 5.02% 8.97% 8.31% FY 02/03 Projected Actual 5.76% 9.74% 9.08% FY 03/04 Base (1) 3.76% 3.14% FY 03/04 Adjusted (2) -0.60% Notes: (1) Base budget request includes salary and benefit costs for current year authorized employees of 575.8 Full Time Equivalents (FTE's). (2) Adjusted Base includes a 3% increase for supervisory and professional employees and a merit increase for employees covered by union contracts. In addition, the pension rate was assumed to increase by.93%for both plans; contributory to 11.61%and non-contributory to 9.62%. Health insurance was projected to increase by 10.85% in FY 2004. (3) In FY 2004 eleven positions are not funded and one position is funded for six months. 7 Salt Lake City Department of Airports March, 2003 Ross"Rocky'Anderson Salt Lake City Mayor Salt Lake City Department of Airports Board Timothy L.Campbell Jodi Howick Executive Director Asst.City Attorney IIIII, Steven L.Domino Kevin F.Robins Barbara Gann Russel B.Pack Randall D.Be 00 Director Jay C.Bingham Director W Peter L.Higgins Director Director Director Director Director Planning& Engineering Public Relationsand Finance&Accounting Administration/ Operations Maintenance Commercial Services Programming Marketing4 I INIMMIIIIIIMIIMIP Lisa W.Oldham Gale R.Evans Eddie Clayson Joseph L.Moratalla Director John A.Buckner Superintendent of Superintendent _ Michael F.Widdison Financial Analysis Info. Technology Commercial Mgr Airport Security Facility Maintenance— Pavement Manager Manager Services Allen G.McCandless Aviation Planning Manager C.J.• Lawrence Medardo Gomez Carol A.Dellinger Alan S.Rohlfing Andrew C.Hobbs Rescue& Daniel L.Spader Jr. General Ledger Telecom Manager Contracts Manager Firefighting• Superintendent _ — Airport Architect Manager Airfield Maintenance Timoth M.G Facility Development y wynette Environmental Programs Manager Alvin Stuart Superintendent Bill Ernst Kelly R.Oldham Greg Bowden — Patrick McCue Airfield &Terminal Superintendent— Manager Audit Manager Property Manager Operations Electrical Support — Geographic Information Systems Bradley E.Wolfe Connie M.Proctor — Safety and Training Superintendent Danny Withers Manager Security&Control Superintendent _ Fleet Maintenance Tina Hose* Dave Korzep Byron Gray Human Resource Superintendent •Salt Lake City Corporation employees assigned to the Airport Consultant Landside Electronic System _ Manager &Emergency SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS STAFFING DOCUMENT FY 2002/2003 ACTUAL and FY 2003/2004 BUDGET REQUEST r ................................ . ................................................,........................................... ...... .. ::::::::•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•-•:•-•:•:•:•:-:-:-:•:•:-:-:•:-:-:-:•:•:-:•:-:•:•:•:-:-:-:-:•-•-•-•••••-..."---•-••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••-••••••-.....:FY-02103-.-:.---..:::::FY:03/04 OIV.i. i.oh::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::.:.:-:::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::FTE Executive Director's Office 4.50 4.50 Public Relations 2.00 2.00 Planning & Environmental 10.00 10.00 Finance&Accounting 19.50 19.50 Administration & Commercial Services 28.00 28.00 Engineering 48.00 48.00 Maintenance 239.00 239.00 Operations 224.80 224.80 STAFFING - EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S OFFICE H.::::::i:::i:::::::.::.:]:::-:•::::::::::::::-:::::.:::::::::::::::::: ::i:::::: :i•: 1:::-:i:•ii :::i:i:: :i: :: ii:i:: ::: :F.Y..:f.3:.2./9.3.::::::iF..y.::q.4i,Q4. :P.0. 1".tjOnjitte::.:: : :H: ::::: :.:: :H::.::.:::: :::::::::-::::::::::::::::::.: :H::: : ::.:::: :.:: : * : ::: ::F17:E:H:.::: ::: ::.::.:FT:E:...... Executive Director's Office Executive Director 1.00 1.00 Management Support Coordinator II 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary II 1.00 1.00 Legal Services Legal Secretary II 1.00 1.00 Property and Contract Specialist 0.50 0.50 TOtgl:ReSir00.0........................c'.•.!ffioe::::i:::.:::: ::::::.::i::::::.::::.::::i:i::::::::::::::.:::.:::::4-.11;":1.:...::.::::::::::... (). Personnej:Servi .oCot::: ::::::::i::::::::::.::::::::.::::::::::.::::i:::::.:::i:i::::::::.::•H:: .:::::::::.:$3'.7:9;f100: STAFFING -PUBLIC RELATIONS DIVISION Public Relations Director Public Relations 1.00 1.00 PR/Marketing Assistant 1.00 1.00 :i:::2..:.(10.:::: :.::::i2:17)0. P6rijiliielSeiiii6titi^i :::::::H:i:H:.:: :H: :::::::::::::::::.i::::::::::: : :i:i:: :H: H: ::::::::::.::::::::::::::.:::::::::4150;SCIO: STAFFING -PLANNING &ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION Planning and Environmental Services Planning and Programming Director 1.00 1.00 Planning and Capital Program Manager 1.00 1.00 Environmental Program Manager 1.00 1.00 Planning & Environmental Specialist II 1.00 1.00 Environmental Specialist I 1.00 1.00 Aviation Planner III 4.00 4.00 Administrative Secretary I 1.00 1.00 ITOtal:POSItiOnS:y;:Planning:andttiVietiijiiiiilith........................................ :: : :AC00::::i2:::: :i:i:i10.:00.1 ................................................................,..................................................................,.................................................... . 9 STAFFING-FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING DIVISION FY 02/03 FY 03/04 Position Title FTE'' FTE Administration Director of Finance and Accounting 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary I 1.00 1.00 Financial Analysis&Debt Management Financial Analysis Manager 1.00 1.00 Financial Analyst-Debt Management 1.00 1.00 Budget and Revenue Analyst 2.00 2.00 Accounting Analyst 1.00 1.00 Internal Audit Audit Manager 1.00 1.00 Lead Internal Auditor 1.00 1.00 General Accounting and Financial Reporting General Accounting&Reporting Manager 1.00 1.00 Accountant III 3.00 3.00 Accountant II 3.00 3.00 Accountant I 1.00 1.00 Payroll Administrator 1.00 1.00 Part-Time/Accounting Intern 0.50 0.50 Total Positions:-Finance and:Accounting Division 1.9.50 .19.501 !Personnel Service:Cost $1,121,100 j STAFFING-ADMINISTRATION AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES DIVISION Administration Director Administration and Commercial Services 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Commercial Services 1.00 1.00 Office Technician I 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary 1.00 1.00 Commercial Services Commercial Manager 1.00 1.00 Property Manager 1.00 1.00 Contracts Manager 1.00 1.00 Customer/Tenant Relations Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Property Liabilities Specialist II 1.00 1.00 Property&Contracts Specialist II 1.00 1.00 Property&Contracts Specialist I 3.00 3.00 Safety,Training&Employee Services Safety/Training Program Manager 1.00 1.00 Office Facilitator I 1.00 1.00 Employee Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Safety Program Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Information Systems Information Technology Manager 1.00 1.00 Senior Software Engineer 1.00 1.00 Network Administrator II 2.00 2.00 Network Administrator I 3.00 3.00 Telecommunications Telecommunications Manager 1.00 1.00 Telecommunications Analyst II 2.00 2.00 Telecom Fiber Technician 1.00 1.00 !Total?Positions-Administration and:Commercia►:Services >28.00 .: !28A0l (Personnel Service Cost $1,698,200 10 STAFFING -ENGINEERING DIVISION :: FY:..... ..Flr!03I0.4 osilton Title....... ::: fTE:.:.:..:... ::::::::FTE:::: P Administration Director of Engineering 1.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary I 2.00 2.00 Civil Engineering and Construction Administration Engineer VII 2.00 2.00 Engineer VI 1.00 1.00 Engineer V 3.00 3.00 Engineer IV 1.00 1.00 Engineering Technician VI 4.00 4.00 Engineering Technician V 3.00 3.00 Engineering Technician IV 11.00 11.00 Construction Manager 2.00 2.00 Professional Land Surveyor 1.00 1.00 Surveyor II 1.00 1.00 Architectural Services Airport Architect 1.00 1.00 Senior Architect II 1.00 1.00 Senior Architect 1.00 1.00 Licensed Architect 1.00 1.00 Architectural Associate IV 1.00 1.00 Architect Associate III 1.00 1.00 Geographic Information System (GIS) Manager 1.00 1.00 GIS Specialist 1.00 1.00 Administration Support Construction Scheduler 1.00 1.00 Project Coordinator II 3.00 3.00 Engineering Records Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Senior Secretary 3.00 3.00 TOtal::Positions: Engi.nOori ig_Di'y Si.(4 ::::::: ::::::::: :: : ::::::4B:QD::::::::::::::::::::::::48:QU: PeFSO.00#t:Sel1liC0:Cast.::::::::::: : ::: ::$2t9 8 7fl0:: 11 STAFFING -MAINTENANCE DIVISION :::::::FY:. . t0 ..FY U3/Q4 sttion 0 Administration Director of Maintenance 1.00 1.00 Airport Maintenance Superintendent 3.00 3.00 Computer Maintenance Systems Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 Budget&Special Projects Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Purchasing Services Officer 0.00 1.00 Administrative Secretary I 1.00 1.00 Senior Secretary 1.00 2.00 Facility Maintenance Senior Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 5.00 5.00 Facilities Maintenance Coordinator 8.00 8.00 ARFF System Simulator Specialist 1.00 1.00 Airport Electrician 1.00 1.00 HVAC Technician II 9.00 9.00 Airport Maintenance Mechanic II 6.00 6.00 Airport Maintenance Electronics Technician 2.00 2.00 Plumber II 7.00 7.00 Sign Shop Senior Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Airport Electrician 1.00 1.00 Airport Sign Maker II 4.00 4.00 General Maintenance Worker IV 2.00 2.00 ' Structural Senior Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 3.00 3.00 Carpenter II 8.00 8.00 Painter II 5.00 5.00 Key Shop Senior Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Locksmith Technician 4.00 4.00 Janitorial Facility Maintenance Contract Administrator 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Contract Coordinator 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Sr. Contracts Repair Technician 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Contracts Repair Technician II 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Contracts Repair Technician I 1.00 1.00 Regular Part-Time/Custodian I 1.00 1.00 12 STAFFING -MAINTENANCE DIVISION -continued :::::F. :0� :.. 3 ........FY 03J0+1 sitio n.T Airfield & Grounds Maintenance Senior Airport Grounds/Pavement Supervisor 4.00 4.00 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 8.00 8.00 Airfield Maintenance Equipment Operator IV 17.00 17.00 Airfield Maintenance Equipment Operator III 47.00 47.00 Senior Florist 0.00 3.00 Auxiliary Airports Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Airfield Maintenance Equipment Operator IV 1.00 1.00 Airfield Maintenance Equipment Operator III 3.00 3.00 Concrete Crew Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 General Maintenance Worker IV 2.00 2.00 Green House Senior Florist 3.00 0.00 Electrical Support Facility Maintenance Supervisor 3.00 3.00 Airport Electrician 14.00 14.00 Technical Support Technical Systems Manager 1.00 1.00 Electronic Systems Program Supervisor 3.00 3.00 Electronic Systems Technician II 7.00 7.00 Fleet Maintenance Fleet/Warehouse Manager 1.00 1.00 Fleet Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 Fleet Management Service Supervisor 4.00 4.00 Fleet Customer Service Advisor 1.00 1.00 Senior Fleet Mechanic 4.00 4.00 Fleet Mechanic 15.00 15.00 Fleet Body and Paint Repairer 1.00 1.00 Fleet Service Worker 2.00 2.00 Senior Secretary 1.00 0.00 Warehouse Warehouse Supervisor 1.00 1.00 Senior Warehouse Operator 1.00 1.00 Warehouse Supply Worker 4.00 4.00 Purchasing Services Officer 1.00 0.00 Procurement Specialist 1.00 1.00 'Toth l>Posit:ions:: Ma rntenartce::Divisiori::::::: :: . :::::::::: :::::::.::: :239:Oa::::':'::::::239:00: Person rel:Service Cot: ::::: :14;0'C7;&00 1 13 STAFFING -OPERATIONS DIVISION ..................................... Administration Director of Airport Operations 1.00 1.00 Airport Operations Superintendent 3.00 3.00 Senior Secretary 2.00 2.00 Office Technician I 1.00 1.00 Landside Operations Landside Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 Airport Landside Operations Supervisor 5.00 5.00 Airport Landside Operations Officers 24.00 24.00 Transportation Transportation Team Manager 1.00 1.00 Transportation Team Shift Supervisor 5.00 5.00 Transportation Team Leader 6.00 6.00 Transportation Team Trainer 1.00 1.00 Shuttle Driver II 41.00 41.00 Shuttle Driver I 2.00 2.00 Access Control Airport Security Compliance Manager 1.00 1.00 Office Technician II 4.00 4.00 Office Technician I 3.00 3.00 Control Center Airport Operations Support Manager 1.00 1.00 Airport Communications Coordinator Supervisor 3.00 3.00 10 Airport Communications Coordinator II 7.00 7.00 Airport Communications Coordinator I 7.00 7.00 Part-Time Airport Communications Coordinator II 1.00 1.00 Paging Operator 1.00 1.00 Regular Part-Time/Paging Operator 3.80 3.80 Airport Police Superintendent of Airport Security Services 1.00 1.00 Airport Police Captain 1.00 1.00 Airport Police Lieutenant 2.00 2.00 Airport Police Sergeant 8.00 8.00 Airport Police Officer 51.00 51.00 Office Technician II 2.00 2.00 Administrative Secretary I 1.00 1.00 Airfield Operations Airport Duty Manager 10.00 10.00 Airport Operations Supervisor 6.00 6.00 Airport Operations Officer 17.00 17.00 Emergency Management Airport Emergency Manager 1.00 1.00 111 14 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS FY 2003/2004 TRAVEL REQUEST S ar.soriiii.. :. ::B... .. hescri tioti :: ::::::::::::::::::::'::::::;::_:'::::::,::::: ........ ::.::::...... p ...........................................Agency ..�......At#erni : : :1=Y:03/.(4::::::: 11/ Board of Directors Commissioner's Group ACI-NA 3 $3,600 Congressional Dinner ACI-NA 1 1,100 Annual Conference ACI-NA 2 3,300 AAAE Management Conference AAAE 1 1,700 Miscellaneous Lobbying Efforts 2 2.000 Sub-Total 11,700 Executive Director and Staff Annual Conference AAAE 1 2,000 Annual Conference ACI-NA 1 2,500 Congressional Dinner ACI-NA 1 1,500 Security Summit IATA 1 2,000 International Air Service Marketing 3 5,600 Lobbying Washington, DC 1 5,000 Past President's Meeting AAAE 1 1,500 National Airport Conference AAAE 1 1,800 Airport Issues AAAE 1 3,000 World Economics Conference ACI 1 3,000 Economic Conference ACI-NA 1 1,800 Airport Affairs Committee ATA 1 1,000 International Issues AAAE 1 4,000 Miscellaneous Travel 1 5,900 Sub-Total 40,600 Public Relations Air Service Forums ACI-NA 1 3,000 Air Service Marketing Meeting Washington, DC 1 2,000 Delta Gateway Showcase 1 2,400 Governmental Affairs and Legislative Issues ACI-NA 1 2,800 International Air Cargo Forum and Exhibition IATA 1 1,500 Intl Airport-Airlines Routes Conference ASM 1 4,000 Route Development Training 1 1,500 International Showcase 1 4,000 PR/Marketing and Comm. Committee ACI 1 1,500 World Travel Market 1 4,000 Miscellaneous Marketing Travel Misc 1 1,000 Miscellaneous Public Relations Travel Misc 1 2,000 Sub-Total 29,700 Legal Legal Committee ACI 2 6,500 Legal Steering Committee Meetings ACI-NA 1 2,500 Utah Municipal Attorneys Conference UMAA 1 1,000 Sub-Total 10,000 111 15 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS FY 2003/2004 TRAVEL REQUEST . ::: ..iS risoritt :: #:: . Bud e Deseritei: ............. .............................geracy:::: ::_: Attend:::::::1=Y031i14:::�_ = 1111 Finance &Accounting Economic Specialties ACI 1 1,500 Annual Conference ACI 1 1,700 Rates & Charges/PFC AAAE 2 4,000 Government Finance Seminars GFOA 2 2,400 Finance &Administration Conferences AAAE 2 2,400 Miscellaneous Travel 2 4,000 Annual Conference GFOA 3 4,800 Airport Auditors Conference AAIA 3 5,400 Internal Controls Development Travel 1 2,000 Performance Measures Standards ACl/AAAE 1 1,500 Annual Conference UGFOA 1 600 Sub-Total 30,300 Planning and Environmental Diversity Committee AAAE 1 1,500 Airport Planning Conference FAA 1 1,800 Airport Layout Plan Workshop FAA 2 2,400 Annual Conference ACI-NA 1 1,900 Bi-Annual Conferences UAOA 2 2,200 Disadvantaged Bus. Enterprise Compliance FAA/AMAC 1 1,500 Environmental Committee ACI-NA 1 1,900 Environmental Issues Meeting EPA 1 1,900 Environmental Recycling Workshop NRC 1 1,600 Facility Conference AAAE 1 1,600 10 National Airports Conference AAAE 1 1,900 National Civil Rights Conference AAAE 1 1,900 Regional Conference NWAAAE 1 1,500 NWM Regional Airports Conference FAA 2 1,500 Technical Committee ACI-NA 1 1,900 Sub-Total 27,000 Engineering Airport Facilities Conference AAAE 2 3,090 Construction Design AAAE 2 1,550 National Convention ACI 1 1,860 Retail and Transit Scoping ACI 1 1,550 Technical Committee ACI 1 1,750 Licensing Conference ACS&M 1 1,860 Geographic Information Systems Conference ESRI 1 1,860 N.W. Mountain Region Seminar FAA 1 1,550 Airfield Lighting Seminar IES 1 1,860 Program Development 1 6,180 Miscellaneous Travel 3,090 Sub-Total 26,200 11) 16 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS FY 2003/2004 TRAVEL REQUEST ::S oorisoriti ::: :Buc.Iget:: „„„: 0 p .. ............................. ..Agency:::::::::::::::::Ahernl:::::: ::MD3/44:::::: Operations National Conference AAAE 1 1,500 Annual Conference AAAE 1 1,500 General Aviation AAAE 1 800 Ground Transportation AAAE 1 1,200 Steering Committee AAAE 2 3,000 Wildlife Management AAAE 1 1,500 Snow Symposium AAAE 2 3,600 ACI Committee Security Meeting ACI 1 1,300 Ground Transportation/Parking AGTA 2 2,800 Airport Law Enforcement Agencies Network ALEAN 4 2,600 Annual Conference of Public Safety APSCO 1 1,300 Aviation Fueler Training ARFF 1 1,000 Boeing Aircraft Familiarization ARFF 2 1,200 SLC ARFF training off-site misc 3,000 Fire Chiefs Convention IAFC/ARFFWG 1 1,000 Code Enforcement Training ARFF 1 1,000 ARFF Miscellaneous ARFF 400 National ARFF Conference ARFF 2 2,500 National Fire Instructors ARFF 1 1,100 Regional Working Group ARFF 2 2,000 Working Group ARFF 2 2,000 BC) Yearly Training BCI 2 1,000 K-9 Explosives International FAA 2 2,600 10 ASOS Safety and Ops Specialist School FAA/AAAE 2 2,600 FAA Northwest Mountain Regional FAA 2 1,200 Security Conference FAA/AAAE/ACI 1 1,300 FBI/Airport Liaison FBI 1 1,200 International Association Chiefs of Police IACP 1 1,500 Miscellaneous for Emergency Manager Misc 1 1,500 Northwest Annual Conference NWAAAE 2 2,400 Northwest Board Meeting NWAAAE 3 3,400 Northwest Chapter Meeting NWAAAE 1 800 Northwest Facilities Meeting NWAAAE 2 2,600 US/Canada Bird Strike Conference 1 1,500 Airport Shuttle Trade Show 1 500 Airport Bus Trade Show 1 1,000 Annual Computer Aided Dispatch Spillman Tech 2 600 Utah Airport Operators Conf. (Bi-annual) UAOA 7 5,500 Airport Bus Road-eo 1 1,200 Utah Association Chiefs of Police 1 500 Sub-Total 69,200 0 17 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS FY 2003/2004 TRAVEL REQUEST i5 4risoriii..: : .:#:::::::: :: :Bud et: : tesdri tibi ::: p ........... ... . ......................gency::: ::: :::Attend: : :t=Y03LQ4:: :. 1 Maintenance Airfield Lighting Products ADB 1 600 Airfield Lighting Conference IES 3 6,300 Airport Fire Apparatus Repair& Maint ARFF 2 3,000 Airport Maintenance Conference AAAE 3 9,000 Annual Fleet Management Conference RMFMA 1 1,200 Annual Technical Conference APCO 1 2,900 Clean Airport Summit National Clean Cities 1 1,600 Cleaning Mgmt. Trade Show&Seminar CMM 1 1,200 Coalition Conference Nat'l Nat. Gas Veh. 1 1,100 Product Showcase COMDEX 4 1,700 Electric West Exposition &Conference Electric West 1 1,200 Electronics Upgrade& Learning Experience Seattle, WA 4 1,400 Energy Security and Clean Air Conference National Clean Cities 1 1,200 Facilities Maintenance Equip. &Systems Portland Airport 3 1,500 Facilities Maintenance Equip. &Systems Seattle Airport 2 900 General Airfield Maintenance GAM 1 2,000 HVAC Equipment and Controls ASHRAE 1 2,300 International Seminar& Exhibits ASIS 1 2,300 Exposition for New Technologies ISC 4 2,000 Miscellaneous Policy Management 2 2,000 Motorola Site Controller Training Motorola 1 2,700 Northwest AAAE Exposition Conference AAAE 2 3,600 Sign & Lighting Update and Experience Denver Airport 1 500 Sign Making Software Training Vermont Sign School 1 3,900 PI Snow Blower Training and Repair Stewart/Stevens 2 3,000 Snow Symposium AAAE 3 10,500 Sweeper Maintenance and Repair Tymco 1 2,000 Truck Equipment Exposition RMFMA 1 1,200 Sub-Total 72,800 Administration and Commercial Services I.T.Association Meeting AAAE 1 2,000 Wireless Airport Association Meeting AAAE 1 2,000 Annual Conference& Exhibit COMDEX 2 2,000 Miscellaneous I.T. Conference 3 5,000 System Integration Conference 2 3,000 HR Local Chapter World At Work 1 2,200 Human Resources Conferences IPMA/SHRM 1 3,000 Airport Trainers Forum AAAE 1 2,000 Training Steering Committee AAAE 1 600 Western Airports Safety Group 2 2,000 Nortel Networking Communications Seminar INNMUG 1 2,200 Liability and Risk Mgmt. Workshop AAAE 1 2,000 Airport Insurance/Risk Seminar ACI-NA 1 2,000 Annual Conference& Exhibit ACI-NA 3 6,000 National Airport Conference AAAE 1 2,500 Art In Airports Workshop AAAE 1 1,200 Retail Conference ACI 2 3,600 Miscellaneous Travel 3,000 Travel Industry Insurance and Law Seminar 1 2,000 1 Property Managers Conference 2 2,000 Sub-Total 50,300 Department:Totala::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::$:367 800: 18 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS FY 2002/2003 and FY 2003/2004 Funds Available as of 7/1/02 Unrestricted Funds (Includes bond debt) $102,767,000 Total Funds Available as of 7/1/02 102,767,000 Sources of Funds Net Increase to Reserves-from Operations $17,641,200 Federal Grants 2,274,000 PFC Revenues 32,137,000 52,052,200 Uses of Funds Capital Projects 24,709,100 Capital Equipment 2,091,900 Buyout of 1993 Swap Agreement 848,000 Increase to 0& M & Debt Service Reserves 800,000 28,449,000 Sources of Funds Net Increase to Reserves-from Operations $10,705,000 Federal Grants 56,076,700 PFC Revenues 109,259,000 176,040,700 Uses of Funds Capital Projects 122,158,400 Capital Equipment 5,821,200 Buyout of 1993 Bonds 11,039,300 Buyout of 1993A Bonds 35,759,900 Increase to 0 & M & Debt Service Reserves 800.000 175,578,800 ::$926 19 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FY 2003/2004 REQUEST 0 :::::Ftin , :::::::::::: t un w d Source n;1 riti n .. .. ..................... . ..... . ...... Qu� ... ..... .......... ritity::: Colt::::::::: :PfC/DOE:::::::::::::AirpcsrC:::: Fleet Equipment Diesel Exhaust Removal System new 6 $53,800 $53,800 $0 Dump Truck new/replacement 5 650,000 650,000 0 Dump Truck Repower(NG) replacement 2 110,000 110,000 0 Electric Cart replacement 1 8,000 0 8,000 Fire Truck replacement 2 1,240,000 1,240,000 0 Front End Loader replacement 2 570,000 570,000 0 Garbage Truck replacement 1 160,000 60,000 100,000 Mower replacement 3 25,500 0 25,500 One Man Vertical Lift new 1 14,500 0 14,500 Paint Strip Remover new 1 60,000 60,000 0 Passenger Ramp new 1 30,000 30,000 0 Pickups/Utility Vehicles replacement 13 370,000 0 370,000 Runway Broom replacement 1 295,000 295,000 0 Runway Cleaner Truck new 2 700,000 700,000 0 Runway Friction Tester new/replacement 2 360,000 360,000 0 Scissor Lift new 1 12,000 0 12,000 Snow Blower replacement 1 305,000 305,000 0 Steam Cleaner replacement 1 12,000 0 12,000 Street Sweeper replacement 1 110,000 0 110,000 Trailer new 2 12,000 0 12,000 Wrecker, 1-Ton replacement 1 50,000 0 50,000 ' Total Fleet Equipment 5,147,800 4,433,800 714,000 Other Equipment Combustion Efficiency Monitor replacement 1 10,000 0 10,000 Communications System, Mobile Command replacement 1 8,000 0 8,000 Custodial Equipment replacement 3 39,000 0 39,000 Exercise Equipment replacement 1 8,900 0 8,900 Fluorescent Bulb Crusher. new 1 3,500 0 3,500 Glycol Land Application Piping new 1 150,000 150,000 0 GPS Base Station new 1 9,000 0 9,000 Infrared Camera for Failure Analysis new 1 15,000 0 15,000 Office Furnishings new/replacement 16 83,000 0 83,000 Post Former new 1 19,500 0 19,500 Postage Machine replacement 1 34,600 0 34,600 Storm Water Pump Station Monitors new 2 6,000 0 6,000 Self Containing Breathing Apparatus replacement 3 9,900 0 9,900 Sign Printer replacement 1 28,000 0 28,000 Survey Equipment replacement 2 19,500 0 19,500 Uninterruptible Power Supply(UPS) replacement 2 150,000 150,000 0 Vinyl Cutting Plotter new 1 16,000 0 16,000 Total Other Equipment 609,900 300,000 309,900 Computers Network Equipment replacement 1 60,000 0 60,000 Printer, Color new 1 3.500 0 3.500 111 Total Computer Equipment 63,500 0 63,500 .. ................. .......... ............................ ....... ............ ... . ..... ............ .... TotaTC4pital:Egwi}imei* $$;621 200: ::$ ;73.1;$00 $9 087;400 20 Mr III IIII SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FY 2003 RE-BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 F2.. ised E t: 0021 03; ;. 03I04 Q �j C ^a `sZm x yxx.. S �• F� a «fie 3 ^•o J.���K'; os ra :'�"fa w,� Asa«„ m�.d ,Fte=ki Llt�• ,k: � � x �t De• �� . wa scri � i tb� 1 . .... 01 rJri:=Q3: Biiiigef: l?equest Airport PFC AIP:. pg# FY 2003 Projects: (to be re-budgeted) 24 Economic Development Reserve $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 25 Capital Improvement Program Committee Reserve 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 26 RNV 16L-34R Storm Drain Improvements 4,083,000 2,813,100 835,600 $83,600 $752,000 27 East Apron Rehabilitation Phase II 2,917,000 3,045,000 1,400,000 140,000 1,260,000 28 SIDA Perimeter Road - Phase I 1,421,000 1,484,100 1,400,000 498,400 901,600 29 Taxiway P Extension 2,556,000 2,667,000 2,300,000 230,000 2,070,000 30 Triturator- Grinder Replacement 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 N 31 Terminal Roadway Security Improvements Phasell 3,984,000 2,297,600 3,687,000 3,687,000 32 Car Rental LobbyExpansion Phase II p 286,600 417,000 100,000 100,000 33 Security Equipment Detection Modifications 725,000 725,400 725,400 725,400 34 Security Gate Modifications 251,000 250,900 200,000 200,000 35 TVAAWOS &Taxilane 373,000 213,100 326,900 32,700 294,200 36 Airport II Runway 16/34 Overlay 1,259,000 1,258,700 1,000,000 100,000 900,000 37 Concourse A Apron Reconstruction Phase I 1,251,000 1,250,800 600,000 264,000 336,000 38 T/W H Rehabilitation (H10-12) 3,420,000 4,260,000 2,419,000 277,000 2,142,000 39 Crossbar Relocation and Rental Car Access Road 7,085,000 5,000,000 6,065,500 1,065,500 5,000,000 Total Capital Projects to be rebudgeted in FY 2004 $33,241,600 $29,312,700 $24,689,400 $4,795,500 $11,238,100 $8,655,800 IP SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,2004 E stirri �„i.:.ated:::::�:: F Y�200�2/ �. E.�Y.2•00 3104: ,,�rEtl S� oFTI F A _ni� n.e d� Pr� ect'B': a U ��.K ro` 1.. et: ec�:f7 t e sari ..{ foci::::::>::: - > ::::: J.......... .... ...udgt:.::: : Fequesj:>: Airport PFC AIP nY pg# FY 2004-Capital Improvement Projects 40 Airport Property Security Fencing- Phase I $2,049,000 $2,049,000 $2,049,000 41 Airport Wide Fire Alarm System Integration 348,000 348,000 $348,000 42 ALP/Environmental Update- Phase I 400,000 400,000 37,500 $362,500 43 Bag Claim Modifications 6,601,000 6,601,000 6,601,000 44 Concourse A Apron Reconstruction - Phase II 1,505,000 1,505,000 288,700 1,216,300 45 East Apron Rehabilitation - Phase III 3,558,000 3,558,000 718,600 2,839,400 46 East Side Oil/Water Separator 411,000 411,000 411,000 47 Land Acquisit- Ph. II (Noise/Approach Protection) 2,668,000 2,668,000 250,000 2,418,000 48 Lighting Upgrade 436,000 436,000 436,000 49 Metal Wall Panel Replacement 1,608,000 1,608,000 1,608,000 N 50 North Support Tunnel Road Rehabilitation 497,000 497,000 497,000 51 Runway 16L/34R Overlay 6,898,000 6,898,000 1,436,600 5,461,400 52 SIDA Perimeter Patrol Road -Phase II 1,222,000 1,222,000 1,222,000 53 Taxiway H Pavement Reconstruction (H7-H10) 2,567,000 2,567,000 528,700 2,038,300 54 Terminal Modifications for In-line EDS 35,000,000 35,000,000 3,500,000 31,500,000 55 Tooele Valley Airport Land Acquisition 2,176,000 2,176,000 591,000 1,585,000 56 TU2 Roof Replacements 714,000 714,000 714,000 57 Landside Road Reconfiguration -West 28,811 000 28,811,000 19,447,100 9,363,900 Subtotal FY2004 $97,469,000 $0 $97,469,000 $22,553,100 $27,495,000 $47,420,900 ''' i406 o 8.i ... T � !:..�x1'Y i�1 4�"' 24S$ ' fib �e � �mactg �a i�j" " „ VR6RQV(�! ., ,. . „ "a;»:`. ., ..>. .. ..,. s:« �� `.« '��>a , .. ,.r 7:,<.�a.,,:4„ t„. '.a" .�>., ,�€�a -„. rwa: 44�?F,�m..•.x>C ,p„. yY Total FY 2003/2004 Capital Improvement $130,710,600 $29,312,700 $122,158,400 $27,348,600 $38,733,100 $56,076,700 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 111 AIP CONTRIBUTIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,2003 and JUNE 30,2004 Y02.. .......................................... a tal Pro P.........1e............................... •.•..............•.................,.......Projected;.;..;..;.:...;R�eque�ted;.;... Capital Improvement Projects R/W 16L/34R Storm Drain Improvements $618,700 $752,000 SIDA Perimeter Patrol Road-Phase I 901,600 Concourse A Apron Reconstruction-Phase I 564,000 336,000 T/W H Pavement Reconstruction (H10- H12) 145,500 2,142,000 East Apron Rehabilitation - Phase II 940,000 1,260,000 Taxiway P Extension 2,070,000 TVA AWOS and Taxilane 5,800 294,200 Airport II Runway 16/34 Overlay 900,000 Runway 16U34R Overlay 5,461,400 Taxiway H Reconstruction (H7- H10) 2,038,300 Concourse A Apron Reconstruction-Phase II 1,216,300 East Apron Rehabilitation - Phase III 2,839,400 Land Acquisition - Phase II 2,418,000 ALP/Environmental Update-Phase I 362,500 Terminal Modifications for In-Line EDS 31,500,000 Tooele Valley Airport Land Acquisition 1,585,000 Apron D Rehabilitation - East Taxiway H Reconstruction (H2- H4) Taxiway M Reconstruction ALP/Environmental Update-Phase II Land Acquisition +otal:�►fP:Fwridiiig :::: :::::::::::::::::;;:; :::::::;:;:::::::::::::�::::::�:�:�::::::�::::::::�::$�2T4OOO::;:::::::��t;rU76rT00:, I 23 ir FY 2003 - 2004 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT P PROJECTS SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Economic Development Reserve Project Description: A fund has been established and set aside for approved economic and international route development projects. This fund will be rolled forward each year if the funds are not utilized. Project Justification: A marked fund is needed for future economic and international route development opportunities as they arise at any of the three airports. This fund will be used for tenant requests or other economic and international route development projects that may require quick action to accomplish. The funds may be used for site preparation, construction activities, economic incentives, or other purposes to promote the airport's economic and international route development. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date As Required As Required As Required Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $2,000,000 24 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: CIP Committee Reserve Project Description: A fund has been established and set aside to fund unanticipated approved Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects. This fund will be rolled forward each year if not utilized. Project Justification: A reserve fund is needed to provide emergency funds for approved Airport capital improvement projects. The funds are established for unanticipated projects and for unforeseen conditions associated with project construction. These funds require approval by the Airport's Capital Improvement Committee. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date As Required As Required As Required Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 1,500,000 25 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 0 Project Title: Runway 16L/34R Storm Drainage Improvements Project Description: This project will install approximately 11,700 linear feet of reinforced concrete pipe on the east side of Runway 16L-34R between Runways M and S. It will also install approximately 10,600 linear feet of reinforced concrete pipe on the west side of Runway 16L-34R between the runway and Taxiway H replacing in both cases the old storm drain line. New drop inlet boxes will be installed and the general area will be re-graded to improve surface drainage. The new piping system will be parallel to the runway and outside of the runway safety area. (Scheduled for AIP entitlement and discretionary funding in F.Y. 2002.) Project Justification: The Airport's 1997 Master Drainage Study lists this project as a priority. This project is needed to address existing flooding conditions along Runway 16L-34R and to comply with Advisory Circular 150/5320-5B, "Airport Drainage." The existing system does not meet the current design criteria established in the Master Drainage Plan in regards to hydraulic capacity and minimum diameter. The existing system is undersized and in general disrepair. This causes the storm drain system to become filled with silt, requiring extensive maintenance. Flooding during heavy storm events contributes to pavement deterioration and affects aircraft operations. Furthermore, extensive ponding is an attraction to waterfowl and a continuing concern to aircraft operations. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date _ October 2001 Mar 2003 October 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 3,654,000 $ 0 $ 60,000 $ 3,000 $ 366,000 $ 4,083,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION SITAR /Ii_._ - `f. °or_l ll z� 11 — .E Al_ a_il -------------- 000 C LUNG Ilk � CI TERM �I � F f1 �L O I� :h„R„I.. , y it e,±---,----_-,-,t-- - =ti �� . r 1 '� tVT--3--C it`-J] _= � G � � s 21 _ _-_ _ t------ _ r ; l _15L%>a � >> S RIINWnY �_ iirmiumiiiiiiiimmi — --- \> , PROJECT LOCATION --- _ "� :,- -'1 ) nA . ", _, -I, 26 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET ' Project Title: East Apron Rehabilitation - Phase II Project Description: This project is the second phase of a pavement management program being undertaken to rehabilitate common use apron at the general aviation facilities at Salt Lake City International Airport. The areas to be improved have been identified through engineering's pavement management program, which indicates the pavement condition index of the pavement. Work will be done on only the common use apron areas and not for any leased apron areas or entranceways to any hangars. Areas in need of rehabilitation will receive an asphalt overlay and sections that are severely worn or inadequately strengthened will be excavated and reconstructed prior to receiving an asphalt overlay. Project Justification: This project preserves and enhances safety and capacity at the Airport by ensuring that pavements essential to general aviation use are in good repair and by strengthening the pavement to permit additional types of aircraft to make use of these general aviation areas. The existing general aviation apron area was originally designed to accommodate smaller general aviation and corporate aircraft. The size and weight of aircraft using the pavement have increased over the years and this has caused greater wear of the asphalt surface. Although the pavement receives periodic maintenance to fill cracks and small failures, most areas have not been resurfaced for twenty or more years. Phase I was completed in 1995 with only a portion of the common use areas being completed. Continued resurfacing is needed in Phase II to prevent further cracking and to avoid general pavement failure. This pavement overlay will increase the strength of the pavement, extend its useful life, and permit use by larger, heavier aircraft. ` Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date October 2001 April 2003 August 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 2,567,000 $ 39,000 $ 51,000 $ 3,000 $ 257,000 $ 2,917,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: minimal PROJECT LOCATION ;< ( F tt)Ei T "11.1 �'� PROJECT C t - ( RUN WA1 35- 1 ) ` 1_ T•,IWAI I` (--- --t3-i . 1 ELF III So o nNT oIII�rll 0 8 0 —L, o _I 1ti� l L_ w 41 i� �_ I�olE,,i %,m ka� , o n a if Hit v n Zrv , CJ � o 27 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 1 Project Title: SIDA Perimeter Patrol Road — Phase I Project Description: This project will provide Security Identification Display Area (SIDA) perimeter patrol roads where they currently do not exist and will upgrade the existing perimeter roads with a permanent, hard-surface pavement that can be used year-round during all-weather conditions for daily patrols and emergency access. Existing perimeter roads are rutted and in poor condition, since they are not presently paved. The work includes importing additional fill where needed, selective grading, asphalt paving, paint markings, and roadway delineation. Perimeter roads that do not currently exist will be added to allow for security patrol along all portions of the fence line. Project Justification: Airport Security Directive 1542-01-07F (Item K) requires that airport operators perform two daily inspections of the perimeter area to ensure that fencing and other barriers are intact and that the perimeter security zones are clear and unobstructed. The Airport revised preliminary road improvement plans in order to permit compliance with this Security Directive. Perimeter patrol roads do not exist at all areas of the Airport's perimeter. Where they do exist, patrol roads are constructed of a combination of surplus road base and asphalt millings from other construction projects. The roads are rutted and often fill with water or snow in inclement weather and become unusable. None of the roads provide an all-weather surface. Patrol and emergency vehicles must be able to inspect perimeter fencing and respond quickly and safely to airfield emergencies in all weather conditions. This requires that patrol and emergency perimeter roads have a permanent, hard surface pavement in order to provide adequate all-weather access. Patrol roads around the runways are also needed to reduce runway crossings and incursions. Incidental work for access roads to existing navigational aid sites will also be improved to permit the Airport to operate and maintain areas. This project will make a significant contribution to advancing Airport safety and security by allowing for compliance with the Security Directives. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date April 2002 May 2003 September 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,268,000 $ 0 $ 25,000 $ 2,000 $ 126,000 $ 1,421,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: minimal PROJECT LOCATION 7---—\\ \--lJ c-(.,�`� 1- lam' (� il o a � � a ��.m C: 0 0 do \3 �� III T a�i PROJECT / LOCATION i \ ' ii-- , _ \ 00 0 ,...yo — ,rF� ■ o --� , i ' '` a IE9��� l 28 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Taxiway P Extension Project Description: This project will extend Taxiway P to the southwest to connect with Taxiway M. Taxiway N, west of Runway 14/32, will be abandoned. The pavement at the intersection of Taxiways M and N has deterioriated creating problems with foreign object debris (FOD), and it will be repaired. The new taxiway pavement will be constructed of stabilized material, imported subbase and base materials, and 16-inches of bituminous pavement. The project will also include paint markings, signs, electrical work and lighting. Both the existing and new pavement sections of Taxiway P will receive centerline lights. Project Justification: Airport capacity will be improved by extending Taxiway P southwest to intersect with Taxiway M. Currently, air traffic exiting Runway 17/35 at Taxiway P has to take Taxiway N, or back-taxi on Runway 14/32 to the passenger gates or cargo areas. Taxiway N, west of Runway 14/32, is not a preferred taxiway by pilots and the control tower because of the sharp 90-degree turns in the taxiway. The pavement has also significantly deteriorated on this taxiway. The Airport's pavement analysis completed in 2002 rates the pavement for Taxiway N with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 20 out of 100, which is a very poor rating. If Taxiway N was not to be abandoned, it would require reconstruction. The Taxiway P extension will therefore provide a safe and convenient high-speed turnoff from Runway 17/35 to the west without requiring the use of Taxiway N, and without closing Runway 14/32. It will also help reduce taxiing times between Runway 17/35 and the passenger gates and cargo areas. This project will make a significant contribution to Airport safety and capacity by providing an appropriate high speed exit for Runway 17/35. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date December 2002 May 2003 September 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 2,219,000 $ 67,000 $ 44,000 $ 4,000 $ 222,000 $ 2,556,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: minimal PROJECT LOCATION 1 �7 _ _ _._._----F UNWAY 34 / PROJECT / LOCATIONS _ _ / / TO BE � ABANDONED __- �- i 1 a5 ; LRUNWAY 35-17 , 29 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET ` Project Title: Triturator Replacement Project Description: This project will install a new triturator system consisting of an above ground inline grinding system that will require hose connections from airline carts or trucks to the grinding system. The existing open pits will be replaced with an entirely closed system. The area that houses the existing triturators will be remodeled to accommodate the new system and to be more sanitary. These changes consist of plumbing, electrical and carpentry work. Project Justification: The Airport provides open-pit sewage dump stations for the airlines. Both of the Airport triturators at TU-1 and TU-2 need to be replaced. Parts are not available for the existing grinding units. The existing grinders are installed in a pit where they are susceptible to flooding if the unit jams up or if the sewer line gets plugged. Several expensive motors have been ruined due to flooding. When the pit is full of sewage it creates a very unsafe environment for maintenance workers. The open pit also creates problems if objects other than sewage enter the pit. Severe damage to the grinder has occurred in the past when the airlines have dropped stainless steel plugs and other objects into the system. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date February 2002 July 2003 July 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget 0 $110,000 $2,000 $0 $1,000 $17,000 $130,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION \ ' ' ''-'' ', \ ---,-----\ 0 _ (44 ' TUNNEL i_ \ FP VENIAL ;1\1 i FAGRITtE'• t-- -J__A '---- / / , _,.. ______ O ._, - -- , —_---._,-„,, ,.„ A ,,:_,,,— _ _„,„----__, _, ,,, , _z______,_______,,,,,,, ,,:,..„,,:„,,,., , s_s__________,__ __,„,_,______,::,,,,,„,,, ,„ r 0 __:____ __z:„.„,,,.,____- , •§„.. __ „.,„, i /,, , �--PROJECT �"I -tiIL� „„ � LOCATION \ 'r-- ---''"1"1 "----- - /lir -----_/-\, 30 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET AMENDMENT Project Title: Terminal Roadway Security Improvements - Phase II Project Description: This project will modify the existing sidewalk, island areas, and the commercial, public, and rental car traffic lanes along Terminal Unit 1 (TU1) and Terminal Unit 2 (TU2). The existing sidewalk on the public load/unload island will be widened to a maximum of 12 feet. The existing landscaped center island will be reduced in size to accommodate traffic lane relocation and placement of new sidewalk. In addition, 1200 lineal feet of canopy structure for public load/unload operations along the new island fronting both TU1 and TU2 will be constructed. This project will include construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, canopy, fencing, landscaping, signing, paint striping, milling, asphalt roadwork, new utility placement, and existing utility relocation. Project Justification: The sidewalk width adjacent to the public unload lanes is undersized and cannot properly accommodate customers. Recent security equipment installations along the skycap curb have eliminated passenger waiting areas making the problem worse. Currently, TU1 has 6 feet of available sidewalk width and TU2 has 8 feet. During busy times, there is no room to load and unload passengers and it is impossible to walk past the skycap positions without entering the street. Skycaps now use temporary barricades in the load/unload lane to provide the additional space needed for carts and passengers. A new canopy will be constructed to protect arriving passengers from the weather. These improvements will be the second in a series to reduce curbside congestion and make a significant contribution to advance Airport safety and security by accommodating new security measures required since September 11, 2001, to protect the public from threats and criminal acts. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date October 2002 July 2003 November 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 3,471,000 $ 80,000 $ 69,000 $ 17,000 $ 347,000 $ 3,984,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION 1 �J —1 '---------__I__—__=_--_,._ \ \ ,,_.4,_,,,r_ c:_--7._n `\ ,',-k )1111, _4_, ----cd— C=1 . \---- .-J ____i_ 0 \-__--�_�_, -_/*•�, --DLl c3 � ..I_ '� PROJECT LOCATIONS 0 ---' l-/ Pi ^/ fl 0 31 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 1 Project Title: Car Rental Expansion Phase II Project Description: This project will expand the existing rental car lobby by removing the existing front wall and adding four additional car rental agency counters. Project Justification: There are currently six rental car agencies operating at the Airport. The upcoming RFP on rental car concessions will allow up to ten agencies at the Airport, requiring an expansion to the rental car lobby. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2002 April 2003 June 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 230,600 $ 28,700 $ 1,700 $ 2,500 $ 23,100 $ 286,600 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT \ LOCATION ( L\ - ,__\_ (,,,., ) i/t 1-- \-3- _\------ , \ _ (( --1 j/ I , iy,.-. r b -----_______ _-_— `ii / ' T ----A7 (r\__I___ ,\) X 0 32 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Security Detection Equipment Modifications 10 Project Description: This project will enhance existing security measures at the Airport by providing additional surveillance and detection equipment at high-risk security areas. The project will install closed circuit (CCTV) cameras at the Terminal 2 screening area and other curbside and terminal locations. Vehicle loop detectors will be added to each bus plaza to monitor vehicle dwell times and notify the control center through the Building Automation System (BAS) when an area needs to be viewed by CCTV cameras. Security stations will be added in Terminals 1 and 2 to provide an area for Operations personnel to monitor ground transportation vehicle activity and to enhance overall surveillance in the terminals. Each station will include monitors and appropriate work areas to accommodate law enforcement personnel. Motion detectors will be added to certain doors that are susceptible to "piggybacking". Video monitors and digital recorders will be added in the operations control center. Walls in the control center will be reconfigured to expand the area as needed for the additional recording equipment. Cabinets and work surfaces that house the monitors and monitoring stations in the control center will be modified to accommodate the new monitors and displays. Project Justification: Not all security risk areas of the Airport have desirable monitoring equipment to monitor potential threat activity. Surveillance cameras and motion detection equipment are needed at certain areas relating to the bus plaza, Terminal 2 screening checkpoint, and other terminal and curbside areas to provide appropriate security coverage. Certain doors in the terminals are susceptible to "piggybacking". The doors need to be equipped with motion detectors that can detect the presence of an individual that attempts to follow behind an authorized person. Security stations are needed to permit a comprehensive monitoring and response at the terminal entrance. In addition, video monitors and digital recorders are needed in the control center to display the additional areas being observed. This project will make a significant contribution to advance Airport safety and security by removing certain security risks in the terminal buildings and providing for appropriate monitoring and response to sensitive areas. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2002 May 2003 January 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $608,000 $43,000 $0 $14,000 $60,000 $725,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION � Q PROJECT LOCATIONS r 33 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Security Gate Modifications Project Description: This project will modify the perimeter security checkpoint at perimeter Gate 16 to improve vehicle queuing and inspection. The gate will be modified to construct separate entrance and exit lanes into and out of the Security Display Identification Area (SIDA). Gates will be added at each travel lane and the Computer Access Security System (CASS) card readers will be relocated adjacent to the gates. The existing guardhouse will be relocated to improve observation of the traffic that travels in all directions. The existing pavement near Gate 16 will be modified to create several vehicle inspection lanes. The curb will be cut to create a new entrance to the inspection area and the pavement will be expanded to the west to replace the area that is supplanted by the inspection lanes. The project includes asphalt paving, fence relocation, pavement marking, hardware and software modifications to the CASS system, and modifying the electrical and communication systems. Project Justification: Recent security directives require additional screening and verification of all persons who enter the SIDA. In addition, delivery vehicles must be inspected before entry into the secure area. Employees must have their name manually checked against a "stop list" to verify their identification. The existing gate areas are not optimally configured to efficiently screen and inspect persons and vehicles. At Gate 16, delivery trucks often block incoming and outgoing traffic at the guard station as they are being inspected. The gates must be reconfigured to improve the ability to screen persons entering secure areas of the Airport, inspect vehicles and verify access authorization. This project will make a significant contribution to advance Airport safety and security by ensuring adequate access control facilities are in place at this entrance to the SIDA. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date 10 Nov 2002 May 2003 July 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 226,000 $ 0 $ 5,000 $ 2,000 $18,000 $251,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATION d UT- D oo o tt H- OD 1117-1 VA\n 1 34 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: TVA AWOS &Taxilane Project Description: This project will install a new Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) Type III P-T and construct the first section of a connecting taxilane to serve the future growth at the Tooele Valley Airport as shown on the Tooele Airport Master Plan. The construction proposed under this project consists of constructing a bituminous taxilane and the installation of a fire protection line, a new surface drainage system, an electrical system for apron security lighting, and a new AWOS Type III P-T on a concrete pad along with all required electrical equipment. Project Justification: In the near future the FAA is proposing to install an Instrument Landing System (ILS) at the north end of Runway 17. The AWOS is required to support the new ILS. The AWOS is a collection of instruments and sensors to collect, measure and disseminate weather information to help pilots plan flight routes and the necessary information for take offs and landings. The new ILS system will change the Part 77 dimensional requirements to precision instrument criteria. As a result, the six existing hangars on the south end of the airport will penetrate the future Part 77 precision airspace surface. These hangars will need to be removed prior to the ILS installation. Tenants in these hangars will be required to build replacement facilities to park their aircraft. This project will provide the taxilane to support the new hangar sites. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date January 2002 June 2003 September 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total 111 Cost Design Budget $ 342,000 $ 0 $ 7,000 $ 1,000 $ 23,000 $ 373,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION 1 Z PROJECT LOCATIONS S 35 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 10 Project Title: Airport II Runway 16/34 Overlay Project Description: This project will make necessary repairs, seal, and overlay the full length of Runway 16/34. Runway shoulders will also be stabilized in areas where required. Connecting taxiways will be overlayed to the hold short line. The north portion of Taxiway A will be cold milled and overlayed. Project Justification: The entire length of Runway 16/34 is in need of repair and an overlay due to surface deterioration and cracking. The Airport's 2002 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) rated this runway at 31, indicating the surface is in poor condition. The north portion of Taxiway A is deteriorating also and will require crack repair and an overlay. Re-surfacing of both the runway and the taxiway will extend the pavement's useful life. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date December 2002 May 2003 Sep 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,123,000 $ 0 $ 22,000 $ 2,000 $ 112,000 $ 1,259,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION 1 ' ..a„sy _'-"; r— �J = ce_ )i----p- --------c____-------7--)\i::::::__.---1_------ Otto \\\\ J�- �-_ l` RUNWAY 16/34 \' \\ EZ. ) CC) \. -J - II 36 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 0 Project Title: Concourse A Apron Reconstruction — Phase I Project Description: This project will replace approximately 11,100 square yards of fiber reinforced concrete apron southeast of Concourse A, and provide all ancillary work. This is a public-use apron. The existing pavement is in poor condition and will be removed and replaced with full strength pavement consisting of portland cement and lean mix concrete. Project Justification: The apron around Concourse A is approximately 20 years old and is deteriorating rapidly. The apron was originally constructed using steel fiber concrete. The steel fibers are exposed and cause unsafe conditions for ramp personnel. Engineering's pavement condition index (PCI) rating for this pavement area is 31 out of 100 and is considered to be in poor condition. The pavement has been patched repeatedly and now needs full replacement. This project will make a significant contribution to advancing Airport safety. The Airport must maintain airfield pavements in good condition to permit safe and effective pavement use at a large hub airport. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2001 May 2003 August 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,1 10,000 $ 6,000 $ 22,000 $ 2,000 $ 111,000 $ 1,251,000 10 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION \ (-) '-'--.-----7-----; \\ _, illrii ' 1I \ rTPeT -��IL_p I{ r� �; /� �r LOCATION J1 =1_� �=4;1-rc.e-• r you Cil ' - s 1_3 ir- 1 1 Alli ,, ' -- --�— _ J � - _� % /-- ---_ C RUNWAY 16L 34R _—_ RUNWAY 34R-16L 11 # \ 37 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Ilk Project Title: Taxiway H Reconstruction—H10 to H12 Project Description: Approximately 3,300 feet of Taxiway H between Taxiways H10 and H12 will be reconstructed in concrete. The existing bituminous pavement is 24 to 33 inches thick and will be rotomilled 18 inches deep and 75 feet wide. The existing taxiway is 100 feet wide which will leave 12.5 feet of full strength bituminous pavement on both sides of the new PCC pavement. A 2 inch bituminous leveling course will be laid on the rotomilled surface to give a smooth, uniform surface on which to place the PCC pavement. Subdrains will be placed on both sides of the PCC pavement to dissipate intruding moisture which may infiltrate through the concrete joints. New light base cans will be installed and all of the centerline light fixtures will be reinstalled. Project Justification: Taxiway H receives a high volume of aircraft traffic because it is the parallel taxiway system for Runway 16L/34R. Because of the high traffic, much of the taxiway is rutting, shoving, and cracking. The existing centerline lights were retrofitted into the pavement. The conduits for these lights were cut into the taxiway surface and backfilled with various types of materials. These trenches are now spalling and cracking, causing serious Foreign Object Damage (FOD) problems. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2002 May 2003 October 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $2,997,000 $60,000 $60,000 $3,000 $300,000 $3,420,000 10 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION / ' _� ^ ,�J 0 ti 0 it .:000 = 0 �0j! - I _.m ,a,� I i a_ amp -= TAXIWAY N . ok !1111 RUNWAY 34R-16L PROJECT ,— LOCATION 17 10 t 38 a All'.'Okl���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������`�����������������������������_SALTLAKE CITYDEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS �A�TAL8K8PROVEK8EP8T FY2003/2004BUDGET Project Title: Crossbar Relocation and Rental Car Access Road Project Description: This project is the first in a series of projects that will relocate and � reconfigure the Airport's terminal area acuaua roads to serve the future terminal location and provide access to |andnidedevoiuprnent. This project will place the engineered fill and construct a total of three bridges for the relocated Croon Bound Access Road (XBAR) and Ron1u| Car A000uo Road (RCAR). Two bridges will span over both the entrance and exit roads serving the Airport at a location immediately north of the North Point Canal. The third bridge will be constructed in between the XBAR bridges to serve the future relocated rental car area. The project will include earthwork, grading, drainage, bridge structures, and temporary erosion control. Project Justification: The current location of the terminal area uuoaua roadways is not in the proper alignment needed to serve the future terminal development. The roadwaysmust be relocated to provide safe and convenient a00000 to the terminals and to allow for the staging and phasing necessary to construct these new facilities. Existing parking areas will be consolidated and car rental service facilities and roadwayswill be relocated before construction for the future development can begin. Design Start Dote Construction Start Data Project Completion Date Juna2OO2 Maroh2003 Deoenober2QO3 - Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cont Design Budget $5'898'000 *738'000 $118'000 $30'000 $300'000 V7'085'000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none Project Location IN ,X Long Term Parking oil Az vo Rental Car % Service ia ir Tr 39 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 0 Project Title: Airport Property Security Fencing — Phase I Project Description: This project is the first project to increase the security of the Airport's perimeter. During this phase, an 8-foot tall chain link security fence will be constructed along the south, southwest, and selected north sides of the Airport's property. CCTV cameras along with CASS and manual vehicle gates will be installed to secure the approach ends of Runways 16L/34R, 16R/34L, and 17/35. The work involves chain link fencing and providing power and communications to each of the CCTV and CASS sites. Project Justification: In light of recent attacks directed against aircraft using Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPAD) and the accessibility to Airport property outside the existing security fencing, both short- term and long-term security suggestions have been recommended. Short-term recommendations are to close the south perimeter roadway known as Old North Temple Street and to restrict access to Airport property along the southwest and north sides of the Airport. Access roads will be gated and closed to prevent non-authorized personnel from accessing the roads. In addition, security camera coverage along the Airport's south perimeter will be provided. The existing observation area near the approach end of Runway 16L/34R will be closed by placing concrete barriers to prevent the public from entering the lot. Proper signage indicating that the lot is closed will also be installed. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date February 2003 July 2003 September 2003 10 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,853,000 $ 0 $ 9,000 $ 2,000 $ 185,000 $ 2,049,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATIONS 7/(1 i' ———`L-——1'"'"''--—-- n> �.,empriu'L„ � l >�J ��- � `�� Yea �l n )C\ Ai PROJECT LOCATIONS S U . a - � ` � Do r�11 lt� U o Vr �o 4,-- v :),_ —\-7--, — ,.:,,,, --,-,7---L2c.:_-____—)c==D- 77---Ir PROJECT // c F' ` _. `; \ LOCATION ( 0,')�>� _ '' y+m� " !I -_/__ J( JD ice ,,%p 111 _ . a- 4P mog p --, �a� y�`_ '� `L).lii\ , I I •,yam ®c \ / 40 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET IProject Title: Airport Wide Fire Alarm System Integration Project Description: This project includes upgrading selected outdated local fire alarm panels and networking the panels. All smoke and heat detectors will be upgraded to an addressable rather than a zone type detector. The system will be upgraded to report to the Control Center, the fire stations, and each building to know exactly where a fire alarm is originating. The system will be integrated with the Building Automation System to include all buildings on the Airport Campus. Project Justification: Currently the Control Center responds to four (4) separate types of fire alarm panels. Integrating the fire alarm systems into a single complete network of individual building addressable systems will improve response time of emergency personnel in an effort to minimize property damage and save lives. Maintenance of the system will be reduced while the reliability of the system will increase. Malfunctions will be reported by device rather than by zone or building. This upgrade will result in a safer facility for both the general public and Airport employees. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date December 2003 May 2004 September 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 300,000 $ 30,000 $ 0 $ 3,000 $ 15,000 $ 348,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none II PROJECT LOCATION Illlf_ 11�_±' i v- _Ill IT--:-='-- - ,_,,_,____________ ' ----[k \r�---- rA;._ 1 � , - fq. )_-": -(----)---- k-:- ,-4,:i( \ ,t k 7-7 __,,--' `‘ LZ jit, ' / jir 11 1-1 r—i-- -17-z--tt: --4ir ' C'D 7-1 1 ) i /,,,, ‘,/ , I.--4„,,,__L---,,,;-..; - F5-E--.CI ---.ilk ---'--' L--\ - ,A if - 71)A-1---.-21P.,r -Itilso_, Qt---- � y i -T�� \` , �� W/ / _= - ,PROJECT `� � \LOCATIONs \ t\\Tio*/61 „- '''''/--.‘'''...-. - ' ,''' ( ,„,,,,,')f_ , , // \ 11\\ � / Q-ER.l�rc�p �e o fic. t \ °; .? �, 'jar,,,_..� W cr,' I� f,\. ':;'_� lag'.- n d 1p 41 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: ALP/Environmental Update Phase I Project Description: The airport layout plan and environmental documentation will be updated to reflect the most current decisions regarding future facility configuration and activity levels.The study will evaluate projects included in the airport Capital Improvement Program(CIP)and identify other related areas that might be impacted. The need and timing for future airfield improvements as well as feasible alternatives will be identified and evaluated. The most current configuration of the terminal and landside development plans will be shown on the updated airport layout plan. Aviation activity forecasts will be updated also to provide the basis for noise and air quality emissions analysis.Any cost benefit analysis that is needed to support federal funding will be performed.The environnmental analysis will include an assessment of the environmental consequences that would result by projects included in the airports Capital Improvement Program. The environmental analysis will identify whether any mitigation actions are necessary and if a full environmental impact statement is required. Both reports will focus on providing the needed documentation to support continuation of the Airport's development program and approval of projects funded with federal grants. Project Justification: The Airport's most current environmental analysis is several years old and should be updated to reflect the recent changes in air transportation services and future development plans. Our environmental impact statement was completed in 1992 and later updated in 1998. The current environmental documentation does not consider the environmental consequences that might occur because of changes in fleet mix and the number of aircraft operations. In addition,the 1998 Airport Master Plan Update documents the need for future airfield improvements. Before projects in the Airports Capital Improvement Program can be funded with federal grants, a full environmental ' analysis must be completed. The environmental analysis must be updated to accurately document the most recent aviaiton trends and future development plans. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date July 2003 n/a July 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget n/a S 400,000 S 0 $0 S 0 $400,000 Operational Impacts I One-time: none I On-going: none 42 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: I Bag Claim Modifications Project Description: This project will remove the existing eight bag claim devices in TU1 and TU2 and replace them with seven new bag claim devices. Three large devices will replace the existing two oval devices and two small round devices in TU1. All four devices in TU2 will be replaced and relocated to improve circulation. The existing floors, bag-belt tunnels, and feed belt conveyors will be reconfigured to serve the new bag claim locations. The existing baggage information display systems will also be modified as needed to reflect the new bag claim configuration. The west end of TU2 will be expanded for the new bag claim layout. The existing terrazzo tile flooring will be replaced with new flooring. Project Justification: The existing bag claim devices have been scheduled for replacement according to their life expectancy, age,and wear and tear on the components due to use. The bag claim devices in TU1 are over 20 years old. Some of the systems were refurbished approximately nine years ago but are now showing signs of stress on the components and structures. The bag claim devices in TU2 range from 13 to over 20 years old. Due to the age and heavy usage of these systems it has become necessary to replace them to avoid complete failure. As a result of recent security directives that prohibit greeters and well-wishers from proceeding beyond the security checkpoint, congestion occurs immediately in front of the security checkpoints in meeting and sending off passengers. In addition, queue lines at these security checkpoints have grown significantly as a result of these new security regulations being implemented.Both of these situations have resulted in overcrowding in the terminal lobbies. By consolidating smaller bag claims into single larger bag claims and by installing them closer together,additional passenger greeting areas and circulation will be created to accommodate these larger crowds. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date _ May 2003 March 2004 September 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $5,113,000 $358,000 $ 102,000 $5,000 $ 1,023,000 $6,601,000 { Operational Impacts I One-time: none I On-going: minimal PROJECT LOCATION 7'r- ` 1 ( �, =,ti `illll ,J_ L I PROJECT r� T 4 LOCATIONS I ,r 11 �Ll -� C 1 C , I 43 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET PProject Title: Concourse A Apron Reconstruction Phase II Project Description: This project will replace approximately 11,000 square yards of concrete apron immediately east of Concourse A. The existing pavement will be removed and replaced with full strength pavement consisting of portland cement concrete and lean mix concrete. Project Justification: This apron is approximately 20 years old and is deteriorating rapidly. The Airport's pavement analysis completed in April 2002 rates this section of pavement with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 30 out of 100 and is considered to be in poor condition. The pavement has been patched repeatedly and is now in need of full replacement. This project makes a significant contribution to Airport safety. The Airport must maintain airfield pavements in good condition to permit safe and effective pavement use at a large hub airport. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 May 2004 September 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,342,000 $ 0 $ 27,000 $ 2,000 $ 134,000 $ 1,505,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none ' PROJECT LOCATION _4 , __,_ ____ _ , ,, ,[J •\ -- / ,s,') FOr\i„,,,7_-_,—,-,----f,f_r_Ti------- -1 1 , ,--77—L,—i ------- —,,j'. .s`) 1 ,=���._ `' PROJECT U r_= . �LOCATION 1 _ __-- ----- ` ;mil -I 1—Ill 1 --___ --- ) RuNwA'( 3 4 R—1 6 L II x - - -- I - T,-_ - - - 0 44 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET IIIProject Title: East Apron Rehabilitation — Phase III Project Description: This project is the third phase of a pavement management program being undertaken to rehabilitate common use apron on the east side of the Salt Lake City International Airport. Adequately strengthened areas of the apron will receive an asphalt overlay while failing pavement sections will be removed and reconstructed. This project will improve only the common use apron areas and will not cover any leased apron areas or the entranceways to any hangars. The areas to be improved have been identified through the Airport's pavement management program, which indicates the pavement condition index of the pavement. Project Justification: The existing east side apron area was originally designed to accommodate smaller aircraft. The size and weight of aircraft using the pavement have increased over the years and this has caused greater wear of the asphalt surface. Although the pavement receives periodic maintenance to fill cracks and small failures, most areas have not been resurfaced for twenty or more years. Phase I and Phase II were completed in 1995 and 2003, respectively. Continued rehabilitation and/or reconstruction is needed in Phase Ill to prevent further cracking and to avoid general pavement failure for these common use aprons. The pavement overlay will increase the strength of the pavement and permit use by larger, heavier aircraft. This project is part of a series of rehabilitation projects to resurface the apron in order to extend its useful life. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 June 2004 October 2004 ' Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 3,133,000 $ 0 $ 110,000 $ 2,000 $ 313,000 $ 3,558,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION / LOCATIONS/ A PROJECT -�(� .D - I ' L ! -- RUNWAY t5-1> ( l �III ln` , DO i: n ,_, ;--6.1 �o l l� �nnat of LI1 7� 601., Io , rou WE, ar 0 0 45 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: East Side Oil/Water Separator Project Description: This project will construct a new automated oil/water separator between the National Guard properties and the City Drain. The new separator will be located just west of 2200 West Street where the existing oil/water separator equipment is now located. The equipment to be installed is an automated oil/water separator with associated pumps, electrical connections, and storage tank. Project Justification: The Airport is physically divided into three separate drainage cells; east, west, and south cells. A new oil/water separator is needed to replace an outdated and inefficient oil/water separator that handles the east drainage cell. The east drainage area is a large geographic area including all ramp areas east of Runway 17/35. The existing oil/water separator equipment is outdated, inefficient, and must be manually operated. A new automated system is required to handle current discharge of these areas to meet discharge requirements. This project is needed to keep the Airport in compliance with UPDES Storm water Permit number 0029488 by providing a more efficient and automatic system. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date January 2004 May 2004 September 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 340,000 $ 33,000 $ 3,000 $ 2,000 $ 33,000 $ 411,000 0 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION \ --- RUNWAY 35-17 A IF_ PROJECT Ea MD D GM LOCATION ❑na❑ o ni. 1P1 1 AD ,=t i OF-F-1: p 0 r uu Ln=r7D - Z] Q Il(1 0 III 46 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 0 Project Title: Land Acquisition - Phase II (Noise / Approach Protection) Project Description: This project is the second phase of acquiring privately owned property north of Runway 17/35 on a voluntary basis. The parcels are located east of 3200 West Street and 1/2 mile north of 2200 North Street. Because the acquisitions are voluntary, they will only be undertaken on a willing seller / willing buyer basis. Approximately 132 acres will be acquired under this project. Project Justification: The Airport currently does not own or control sufficient property north of Runway 17/35. The 1998 Master Plan suggests that Runway 17/35 may be realigned and moved further north in the future. It is beneficial to own and control property along the extended runway centerline to ensure future land use compatibility and to protect future approach surfaces. These properties have continuous aircraft over flights on a twenty-four hour basis. The 2003 Noise Exposure Map in the F.A.R. Part 150 Study indicates that major portions of these properties are within the 65 DNL noise contour. Property acquisition will enable the airport to own and manage the area to ensure compatibility with airport operations. Design Start Date Start Date Project Completion Date _ n/a July 2003 October 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 2,668,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: minimal PROJECT LOCATION _ ( ill, --___-, _ (r^/ - -\\ , PROJECT r f LOCATION ___4 '\__ \ , 32„„„,E.,, __ ; \ -, .____A__\ _____________ , \ -------„_ T, 1 L? i �� I i I - 1 - P 47 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET tProject Title: Lighting Upgrade Project Description: This project consists of upgrading lighting in two areas. The first area will upgrade the existing fluorescent lighting in the airline baggage handling rooms in TU1 and TU2. The new lighting will include lighting controls to turn the lights off when they are not in use. The second area to upgrade is the existing apron lighting on Concourses A and B. The existing apron lighting is inadequate and creates a safety concern for apron personnel. These apron fixtures are old and controlled by photoelectric cells. New lighting controls will dim the lights when planes are not at the gates and lower the lights to a specified security level after the last flight arrives. The system will operate similar to the apron lighting on Concourses C, D, and E. Project Justification: The existing light fixtures in the baggage handling rooms are over 20 years old and are inefficient. Light levels are low, creating safety issues. Due to the age of the fixtures, parts are hard to get and the fixtures require excessive maintenance to keep them operational. Every time maintenance personnel disturb the fixture wires, the insulation on the wires falls off, creating potential safety hazards. New fixtures, utilizing modern lighting technology and a lighting control system, will be installed to save energy and improve safety. In addition, the apron fixtures on Concourses A and B are over 20 years old and also require excessive maintenance. These fixtures will be replaced with more energy efficient fixtures mounted on the existing light poles. Also included is a lighting control system that will turn the lights to dim or off when not in use. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 March 2004 July 2004 ' Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 379,000 $ 15,000 $ 0 $ 4,000 $ 38,000 $ 436,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION ___------- ------,(——I/ 71)1 J �� �� �r, r� \:. jil/-7, c �.__:J PROJECT I _ `- v ' LOCATIONS it II 48 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET ' Project Title: Metal Wall Panel Replacement Project Description: This project will remove the exterior metal wall panels on Concourse D and the B-C Connector. The panels will be replaced with new composite wall panels and glazing. Project Justification: The metal wall panels on Concourse D are delaminating from the sub structure and have been pop riveted to keep the panels from falling to the ground. On the B-C Connector, the panels are also delaminating but have not fallen off. These panels are losing their insulating value and creating increased HVAC costs for these areas of the airport's facility. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date October 2003 March 2004 June 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 1,227,000 $ 98,000 $ 25,000 $ 13,000 $ 245,000 $ 1,608,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION 1 _-- — _____-_,___(7_ / \'-)\ - 0 i --/ , ,__ ___ _______ ___ , i \------, Li H4ij .__.._______),: ,..t. ___).___L\\ \ f ° o 110 00 0 = pG oC=O C=L \- „ \ --J iliE ,CD=1 �.----r- PROJECT �-----_—' ii �. ' y _ LocAnoN cDo ill G f\ ---ii ° c2 , ,,_il____,0 ,„,, ,__ , N ----- hivr, , 4/ __ , el A (-----) > 49 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: North Support Tunnel Road Rehabilitation Project Description: The road surface in this tunnel has been subject to frequent flooding due to improper drainage. This project will include replacing the expansion joints and a 2-foot section of concrete pavement on either side of the joints for the entire road width. A dewatering system will be installed where the road abuts the tunnel floor. The entire surface of the road from tunnel entrance to exit will be ground down and resurfaced with a concrete sealant. Project Justification: The Airport's pavement analysis completed in 2002 rates this roadway with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 54 out of 100, which is a marginal rating. This roadway is the only route between the terminals and the north support area of the airfield without going outside of the secured area or across two active taxiways. The heavy use of this roadway and problems with flooding in the tunnel have resulted in deteriorated pavement conditions, including cracks and spalls. This roadway is extremely crucial to the operation of the Airport. It allows essential services to travel between their facilities and waiting aircraft, such as food services, plane cleaning services, fueling facilities, and airline and airport maintenance services. This project will make a significant contribution to Airport safety and capacity. The Airport must be able to use this tunnel to effectively operate the airfield at a large hub airport. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date February 2003 July 2003 October 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget ' $ 421,000 $ 25,000 $ 8,000 $ 1,000 $ 42,000 $ 497,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION \ ---- -"Ipp --\\ --)l_ 0 % / - L - ---j----- -__ lir 0 L * it ) 1. 0 n 1�� y (, - PROJECT J ___, �-^- �� o-f " .I,LOCATION L,i 50 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Runway 16L/34R Overlay 0 Project Description: This project will remove and replace 3-inches of bituminous pavement over the entire length and width (10,800 feet x 150 feet) of Runway 16L/34R and all connecting taxiways up to the hold short lines. The existing in-pavement lights will be removed and the extension rings and spacers removed after coring around each light. The surface will be cold milled and repaved. After paving, the extension rings and lights will be reinstalled. Other incidental work includes repainting and removal and reinstallation of the surface scan sensors. Project Justification: Runway 16L/34R and all connecting taxiways were last overlaid in 1996 using a modified bituminous mix. This overlay has not performed as anticipated. The surface is rutted and uneven, creating rough landings and takeoffs. Visual inspection of the pavement shows areas of severe cracking, rutting, and loose aggregate creating foreign object debris (FOD) problems. Furthermore, rubber buildup and polishing of the runways aggregate has contributed to low friction values. This runway will be resurfaced to restore the runway's pavement integrity needed for safe operation at the Airport. This project will make a significant contribution to Airport safety and capacity. The Airport must keep runway pavements in good condition to permit safe and effective landings and use of the facilities at a large hub airport. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 June 2004 October 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total ' Cost Design Budget $ 6,026,000 $ 241,000 $ 121,000 $ 28,000 $ 482,000 $ 6,898,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION - , ti=__= ) - I \ \___ ry - \ --2,-r c,) o 0 E 0 /f�/� o P �'e f — 1 \ 1 , A-c% r ET (7), , ,______, ,_ ,_, ____ I:lai,--„,,,,------r-Et) -a 1--: If IT\ Aa____LI _, 0 ,,______) , _ jr- Jis_.?, _ „ 1_,_=_________ ________,__(__2_ , ,_ ,__,,, IRUN AY 3411-GL I PROJECT /_z VJ_4j LOCATION \ [ , ,;;'',: ( _ ' i \ . 51 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 1 Project Title: SIDA Perimeter Patrol Road — Phase II Project Description: This project is the second phase of work to upgrade perimeter patrol roads to allow access during all weather conditions. This project will upgrade existing perimeter patrol and emergency access roads around Runway 16R/34L. The project includes importing fill material, selective grading, bituminous paving, signing, roadway delineators, and pavement markings. Project Justification: Airport Security Directive 1542-01-07F (Item K) requires that airport operators perform two daily inspections of the perimeter area to ensure that fencing and other barriers are intact and that the perimeter security zones are clear and unobstructed. Existing perimeter roads do not provide adequate access to patrol the entire airport perimeter. The existing perimeter patrol roads are constructed of road base and are rutted and often fill with water and snow in inclement weather, becoming unusable. None of these roads provide an all-weather surface. Patrol vehicles must be able to inspect perimeter fencing and emergency vehicles must be able to respond quickly and safely to airfield emergencies in all weather conditions. This requires that the existing patrol and emergency perimeter roads have a permanent, hard surface pavement in order to provide adequate all-weather access. Patrol roads around the runway are also needed to reduce runway crossings and incursions. This project will make a significant contribution to advancing Airport safety and security by allowing for compliance with the Security Directive. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 May 2004 August 2004 0 Construction Outside Design Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Budget $ 1,129,000 $ 0 $ 23,000 $ 2,000 $ 68,000 $ 1,222,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: negligible PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATIONS (Az--- / Rlins,N Sal—in, \ 1 1 p-c-- ./(- _./(_- ,/ ____,___,,,, -., _,__:--_---_ ,_. c ---?p,41-- - _ - ,=, - ..1 , r. A_L., 7 11F12\ ‘— ` `�'"i ��� 'moo �\ (._ [ln_r_-_. 'ice --L1 �L= nil:" 52 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 1 Project Title: Taxiway H Reconstruction (H7-H10) Project Description: Approximately 2,500 feet of Taxiway H between Taxiway H7 and H10 will be reconstructed in concrete. The existing bituminous pavement will be removed and replaced with a bituminous leveling course and 16 inches of portland cement concrete. Other work includes removing and replacing taxiway lights, paint markings and other incidental work as needed. Project Justification: Taxiway H receives a high volume of aircraft use because it is the parallel taxiway system for Runway 16L/34R. In addition to the traffic volume, portions of the pavement overlay completed in 1996 has deteriorated faster than would normally be expected, resulting in rutted, uneven pavement. The Airport's pavement analysis completed in April 2002 rates this section of pavement with a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranging from 60-68 out of 100, which is a marginal rating. Visual inspection of the pavement shows areas of severe cracking, rutting, and loose aggregate creating foreign object debris (POD) problems. This project will make a significant contribution to Airport safety and capacity. The Airport must keep airfield pavement in good condition to permit safe and effective pavement use at a large hub airport. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 May 2004 October 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 2,249,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 3,000 $ 225,000 $ 2,567,000 r Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION — ; - — ' 17-/„1----4, 0 , L \, \ q,S.., I � =J — —= --IEteLF-_a.rs� o T_�— ) ti = r ITcL I. I L CD ,---,---_:). c___b a , _ _____, cr_________—____) ( 0 ' r�rw s PROJECT \-- )/ / LOCATION °`_ ( _ __ - _= 1 l , u 0 53 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Terminal Modifications for EDS IIProject Description: This project will modify Terminal Units 1 (TU1) and 2 (TU2) to create new space that is needed to install EDS equipment and integrate it with bag conveyor systems. Existing bag conveyor systems in both terminals will be reconfigured to transport bags to and from centralized bag screening facilities. The conveyor systems will include all components needed to receive, sort, inspect and re-distribute luggage. Existing airline offices in each terminal will be relocated as needed to accommodate bag conveyor systems and passenger check-in counters in TU1 will be removed to create an area where EDS and bag conveyor equipment can be installed. The United ticket office will be reconfigured to improve passenger queuing at the security screening checkpoint. The front of TU1 will be expanded to create new space in which ticket counters and passenger circulation areas can be replaced. TU1 and TU2 will also be expanded to the south and east respectively to create centralized screening facilities. Structural, mechanical, and electrical modifications in the terminals will be undertaken and asbestos will be removed. In addition, the temporary TSA screening stations that are located along the terminal road will be replaced with permanent enclosures. The project will be undertaken in several phases to maintain airline operations at all times and to coincide with the availability of federal funds. Project Justification: The current EDS and ETD equipment in the terminals was installed as an interim measure until permanent systems could be developed, designed and constructed. The 69 ETD and 8 EDS machines currently located in the terminals were placed in areas that were readily available at the time; however, the equipment significantly impacts passenger circulation and creates greater congestion in many areas. Furthermore, TSA protocol requires that EDS equipment be the primary method for bag screening. Presently, bags are screened for explosives prior to passenger check-in, which increases the cost to staff and manage the system. For these reasons the existing ETD machines need to be replaced with EDS equipment that is integrated into the baggage conveyor systems. Bag screening must be relocated beyond the check-in process. The existing island skycap and ETD booths also were installed temporarily prior to the Olympics to increase security and convenience for the passengers. Additionally, the existing ceiling and fire ceiling above the TU1 ticket and bag claim lobbies contain asbestos. As construction is undertaken in these areas, the asbestos must be removed. II Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date November 2003 May 2004 October 2005 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 28,408,000 $ 2,131,000 $ 105,000 $ 95,000 $ 4,261,000 $ 35,000,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION --�J 1 r-- -' �� l'\\ ( I L —Lidr # ;3, E__, r -r--,-------- d 5-=3\ (---- ----------Lr_ ,////,',J —Th---r-----C-7 nj� - l ,,\,, I J'e A PROJECT P 1 LOCATIONS 54 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Tooele Valley Airport Land Acquisition Project Description: This project will purchase several parcels at the north and south ends of Runway 16/34 at Tooele Valley Airport (TVA) to accommodate dimensional standards specified in Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 "Airport Design". Additional parcels west and east of the airport will be purchased to ensure compatible land use in the future. Project Justification: The FAA plans to construct an Instrument Landing System (ILS) at TVA on the north end of Runway 16/34 in the near future. The ILS system will change the dimensional standards for the runway protection zones and object free areas. The FAA requires the airport to own or control the property within the boundaries of the runway protection zones and object free areas. Acquiring this land will fulfill FAA requirements. In addition, the airport developed a Land Use Policy Plan based on FAA guidelines that recommends purchasing adjacent property to reduce the impact of residential development. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date n/a July 2003 September 2004 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget n/a n/a n/a $ 18,000 n/a $ 2,176,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none 111 PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT LOCATIONS v 75 x 5500 44 PROJECT LOCATIONS TO 80 SAL, rt77 55 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET 11 Project Title: TU2 Roof Replacement Project Description: This project will replace the existing membrane roof of Terminal Unit 2 (TU2). Approximately 134,300 square feet of roof will be replaced with a new flexible sheet membrane roof. Project Justification: The existing flexible sheet membrane roof of TU2 is over 10 years old and is becoming brittle with age. It is beginning to crack, requiring excessive maintenance and patching. The roof has been reviewed by a consultant and is in need of replacement. If it is not replaced, there is a possibility of roof failure resulting in water damage to the facility. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date _ February 2003 July 2003 August 2003 Construction Outside Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Design Budget $ 672,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8,000 $ 34,000 $ 714,000 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: none PROJECT LOCATION 11. j�L�Z \\ e, , ,o 0 \__ ,, \ �( -- .>— ' r Jl 1/ PROJECT r r � /� LOCATIONS r S \ \ L _i____, , v__ _ ,,,, ,__. r__________, ID 1-,1 _____,_, , if LI LI--1 7,9 II -- A LT-LI-----)B (----) _ Z ,Z) RUNWAY I __ --- 1 / JNwAY 34R-16L I I 0 56 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FY 2003/2004 BUDGET Project Title: Landside Road Reconfiguration -West 10 Project Description: This project is the second phase in a series of projects that will relocate and reconfigure the Airport's terminal area access roads to serve the future terminal location, accommodate Development Program construction phasing, and provide access to Iandside development associated with the Airport's Development Program. This project will construct a new employee parking lot, toll plaza and parking office facility, west Quick Turn Around (QTA) site, long term parking, and Rental Car Access (RAC) service sites. In addition, paving will be completed on terminal access roads, RAC roads and the Cross Bound Access Road (XBAR). The project will include earthwork, grading, drainage, utilities, curb and gutter, paving, structures, landscaping, and other incidental work. Project Justification: The current location of the terminal area access roadways is not in the proper alignment needed to serve the future terminal development associated with the Airport's Development Program. The roadways must be relocated to provide safe and convenient access to the new terminal and to allow for the staging and phasing necessary to construct the new terminal building. Existing parking areas and car rental service facilities must be relocated before construction on the new terminal building and elevated roadways can begin. The roadways must be constructed in their new alignments before work on relocating these affected facilities can begin. This project is the second phase of reconfiguring the landside in accordance with the Airport's Development Program. Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date June 2003 April 2004 November 2004 Construction Soft Testing Expenses Contingency Total Cost Costs Budget $21,668,000 $3,201,000 $542,000 $ 150,000 $3,250,000 $28,811,000 1111 Operational Impacts One-time: none On-going: minimal Project Location V {` Toll Plaza s'''''— = [y 10 0 _ 4e? b2 Long Term — 1 Relocated Parking XBAR and o ,o -- I i } RAC Road lCO o CO `-�� ;j �- ll "o io eo C T �� E 1 _ � 1 Rental V West '�2 --. Car Siteso a �� QTA \ `� __:: __;� i. �.III . ,o oo i Site `-- ,`i,.• - -yr if If _��___' 1 -firs- ;, iii Employee it Parking - `ii %- ?€� _ irfii Cry 57 MI IP ill SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS Source and Use Statement(In 100's) January 01,2003 through June 2004 Jan-03 Feb-03 Mar-03 Apr-03 May-03 Jun-03 ::::::FY:02/03:::::::: ..:::Total:::::::::::::: Beginning Cash Balance $118,208 $122,419 $126,740 $131,560 $135,685 $138,257 $118,208 Source of Funds: Net Improvement Cash from Operations 2,027 2,327 2,327 2,327 2,327 (2,461) 8,874 Airport Improvement Program Grants- 21 225 1,586 1,832 Repayment of Improvement Fund from PFCs 2,390 2,249 2,870 2,257 1,020 520 11,306 Total Improvement Funds 4,417 4,576 5,197 4,605 3,571 (355) 22,011 Source of PFC Funds: Passenger Facility Charges 2,590 2,447 3,072 2,638 2,727 3,035 16,510 Interest 4 4 5 4 5 5 28 Total PFC Funds 2,594 2,451 3,077 2,643 2,732 3,040 16,537 Total Source of Funds 7,011 7,027 8,274 7,247 6,303 2,685 38,549 01 00 Use of Funds: Construction Funded from Operations 207 255 376 459 775 1,185 3,256 Construction Funded by AIP 21 225 1,586 1,832 Payoff of the 1993 Bond/Swap 848 848 Total Improvement Fund Usage 207 255 376 480 1,000 3,619 5,936 Use of PFC Funds: Repay Improvement Fund 2,390 2,249 2,870 2,257 1,020 520 11,306 Construction New Development 195 102 101 137 301 832 1,668 Construction Funded by PFC 9 100 106 249 1,411 1,688 3,563 Pay-off of the 1993A Total PFC Fund Usage 2,594 2,451 3,077 2,643 2,732 3,040 16,537 Total Use of Funds 2,801 2,706 3,454 3,122 3,731 6,659 22,473 Ending Cash Balance $122,419 $126,740 $131,560 $135,685 $138,257 $134,284 $134,284 VI ! IF SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPOR Source and Use Statement(In 100's) January 01,2003 through June 2004 Jul-03 Aug-03 Sep-03 Oct-03 Nov-03 Dec-03 Beginning Cash Balance $134,284 $128,917 $129,743 $129,710 $132,151 $134,530 Source of Funds: Net Improvement Cash from Operations (1,143) 1,438 773 1,358 1,493 (3,270) Airport Improvement Program Grants- 2,900 4,766 2,203 2,575 360 Repayment of Improvement Fund from PFCs Total Improvement Funds 1,757 6,205 2,976 3,933 1,493 (2,910) Source of PFC Funds: Passenger Facility Charges 3,258 3,204 2,659 2,782 2,584 3,036 Interest 8 8 7 7 6 8 Total PFC Funds 3,266 3,212 2,665 2,789 2,591 3,043 Total Source of Funds 5,023 9,417 5,641 6,722 4,084 134 01 co Use of Funds: Construction Funded from Operations 1,594 1,756 1,302 930 619 497 Construction Funded by AIP 2,900 4,766 2,203 2,575 360 Payoff of the 1993 Bond/Swap Total Improvement Fund Usage 4,494 6,522 3,505 3,505 619 857 Use of PFC Funds: Repay Improvement Fund Construction New Development 1,463 1,902 1,524 776 319 82 Construction Funded by PFC 4,433 167 645 767 1,327 Pay-off of the 1993A Total PFC Fund Usage 5,896 2,069 2,169 776 1,086 1,409 Total Use of Funds 10,390 8,591 5,674 4,281 1,705 2,265 Ending Cash Balance $128,917 $129,743 $129,710 $132,151 $134,530 $132,398 mirr W. SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPOR Source and Use Statement(In 100's) January 01,2003 through June 2004 Jan-04 Feb-04 Mar-04 Apr-04 May-04 Jun-04 : ::FY:03f04:::::::::: :-foi;al Beginning Cash Balance $132,398 $135,377 $138,578 $141,980 $144,605 $145,246 $134,284 Source of Funds: Net Improvement Cash from Operations 705 1,552 1,034 1,379 1,655 (3,224) 3,751 Airport Improvement Program Grants- 818 365 410 365 420 1,833 17,016 Repayment of Improvement Fund from PFCs Total Improvement Funds 1,523 1,918 1,445 1,743 2,076 (1,391) 20,767 Source of PFC Funds: Passenger Facility Charges 2,590 2,447 3,072 2,638 2,727 3,035 34,032 Interest 6 6 8 7 7 8 85 Total PFC Funds 2,597 2,453 3,080 2,645 2,734 3,043 34,117 Total Source of Funds 4,119 4,371 4,524 4,388 4,810 1,651 54,884 rn 0 Use of Funds: Construction Funded from Operations 239 256 207 211 626 1,128 9,363 Construction Funded byAIP 818 365 410 365 420 1,833 17,016 Payoff of the 1993 Bond/Swap 11,039 11,039 Total Improvement Fund Usage 1,057 621 618 576 1,046 14,000 37,418 Use of PFC Funds: Repay Improvement Fund Construction New Development 6,066 Construction Funded by PFC 84 549 504 1,187 3,122 4,003 16,790 Pay-off of the 1993A 35,760 35,760 Total PFC Fund Usage 84 549 504 1,187 3,122 39,763 58,616 Total Use of Funds 1,141 1,170 1,122 1,763 4,168 53,763 96,034 Ending Cash Balance $135,377 $138,578 $141,980 $144,605 $145,246 $93,135 $93,135 Mir Mir V SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS PERFORMANCE MEASURES FISCAL YEARS Total Passengers (in millions) Yield Per Enplaned Passenger .._. -- 2004 Budget 18.4 if Operating Revenue Per Enplaned Passenger ----7 J1 El Operating Expense Before Rebate Per Enplaned Passenger 2003 Projection 18.4 El Terminal Rents&Landing Fees Per Enplaned Passenger — $11.00 2002 18.6 2001 18.8 $10.00 $9.81 — $9.68 2000 19.9 $9.41 $9.25 $9.00 Total Air Cargo/Air Mail(in million pounds) 2004 Budget 486 2 2003 Projection 481.4 $7.01 $7.00 cr) - $6.57 2002 476 6 $5.85 2001 477.7 2000 569.3 $5.00 $4.87 $4 59 Total Operations(in thousands) $3.76 ,..'Or, ma ,$3 26 2004 Budget 411 1 **# Irt$,,3z,,,i 42 ii. $3.00 5,/, kr,Xx 2003 Projection 409.0 *P41 ,,. 11::: 2002 407.0 .f.:4 ::•• .,i,4,4,474.H.:::: ,.,,,..,T-Its.,Inzi i14.,4$ 2001 372,2 V.V! $1 00 .0,., 2000 366.9 2000 2001 2002 2003 Projection 2004 Budget SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS N� OPERATING REVENUE COMPARISON U� ~ FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 09/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Operating Revenue: Airline Revenues $ 44.212.514 $ 43.444.085 $ 45'351.143 $ 47.840,400 $ 42.555.300 Concenoiune/{}thmrRenta| 43.057.531 45,166'584 43.977.103 40.049.900 40.130.100 State Aviation Fuel Tax 5.827.072 6.878.249 2.367.729 2.329.000 2.329.000 Total Operating Revenue $93.107.117 $04.688.918 $91.895.975 $00.219.200 $85.014.400 Total Enplaned Paoaongers(EP) 8.902.846 9.778.248 9.105.141 8,195.684 9.195`684 Operating Revenue/EP $9.41 $9.68 $10.00 $9.81 $0.25 5 YEAR OPERATING REVENUE COMPARISON $120.000.000 - ---- '------- _-_-_- -_- State Aviation Fuel Tax Connensionox}thornonta| - 12.000.000 *110U8VOou ` ' Airline Revenues / Total E --�- � nn|onedP�000ngem(EP) '__ _ � $100.000.000 ^& - 10.000.000 LLJ UUK8 U HUKUUUU $90,000,000 - UUNNU VNUUUU0 III LU LX $80.000'000 -»'»»»'»«» $70,000.00LLJ 9L -6,000.000 � $60.000.000 $50.000,000 - _4,000,00 u^u.oOo.00n - -2,000,000 $30,000,000 - $20.000.000 » 9900 0001 0102 0203 0304 � � FISCAL YEAR 62 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS ' AIRLINE RENTS, RATES, CHARGES&FEES COMPARISON FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Aviation Revenue: Terminal Space $ 21,373,990 $ 21,608,734 $ 23,945,634 $ 24,067,800 $ 24,133,000 Landing Fees 16,183,382 17,090,156 15,907,784 18,101,500 13,130,300 Support Buildings 4,976,797 3,033,388 3,783,008 4,666,200 4,525,700 Fuel Farm 1,120,249 1,120,249 1,120,249 1,004,900 766,300 Security Charges 558,096 591,558 594,468 - - Total Aviation Revenue $ 44,212,514 $ 43,444,085 $ 45,351,143 $ 47,840,400 $ 42,555,300 Total Enplaned Passengers(EP) 9,902,846 9,778,248 9,165,141 9,195,684 9,195,684 Aviation Revenue/EP $4.46 $4.44 $4.95 $5.20 $4.63 5 YEAR AIRLINE RENTS, RATES, CHARGES AND FEES i ' iTotal Aviation Revenue —A—Total Enplaned Passengers(EP) $55,000,000 — ---- -------- , 12,000,000 ' $50,000,000 $45,000,000 A >t;;_;, .- 10,000,000 ~'' '. '• jai: $40,000,000 , :£gin"x` $30,000,000 ='_ Z ,rp, `- z=.;, -, " 6,000,000 p. ® $25,000,000 — _ >A ;V " ;y i =, ,;;,; 4,000,000 z tu — _.h£,, '_.c $15,000,000 • • $10,000,000 — ,y-,a }ck;z.£ b :ki g ;?,,, 3, 5,000,000 , ;Me `"" 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 ' FISCAL YEAR 63 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 0 CONCESSION REVENUE COMPARISON FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Concessions: Flight Kitchen $1,915,376 $1,890,800 $1,376,300 $1,140,200 $1,140,200 Food Service 2,285,294 2,100,300 2,218,500 2,266,800 2,309,000 Vending 165,279 325,300 335,300 348,600 358,700 Public Telephones 708,377 712,000 441,100 241,900 200,000 News & Gifts 2,931,979 3,090,900 3,874,500 3,254,700 3,379,400 Car Rental Agencies 10,633,158 11,006,800 10,384,800 9,586,800 9,457,600 Auto Parking 17,984,703 18,909,400 15,640,100 14,580,500 14,309,200 Advertising 712.765 938.200 2.223,700 1.756,600 2,134,600 Total Concession Revenue $37,336,931 $38,973,700 $36,494,300 $33,176,100 $33,288,700 Enplaned Passengers (EP) 9,902,846 9,778,248 9,165,141 9,195,684 9,195,684 Concession Revenue/EP $3.77 $3.99 $3.98 $3.61 $3.62 5 YEAR CONCESSION REVENUE COMPARISON ' $45,000,000 — Total Concession Revenue 14,000,000 1 —A—Enplaned Passengers (EP) $40,000,000 — ie,. — 12,000,000 $35,000,000 — 4 , - W :, 3:,>,.� 000 co n $30,000,000 — G ,> 7 ., ,>,, - ti - 8,000,000 W w $25,000,000 - - _ .;-- `,` �;;- , W a. ( ILI $20,000,000 — K.W ,'6 C �F co y,,,- 6,000,000 �, �:�;:-: "'=ar.� ram; z 0 $15,000,000 Via-% - " . j1 0, V =. r~ "7 ": 4,000,000 W $10,000,000 - i e T - 7- $5,000,000 - T `^ \` y , - - 2,000,000 ;, -,:x,,x^ -"= `:fig,,y;:.., i`-,,, %A, $0 `-li i -_ , i, 1 _ 1 ,-- 0 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 ` FISCAL YEAR 64 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 0 OPERATING EXPENSE COMPARISON FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Total Operating Expense $45,454,106 $47,638,781 $53,641,563 $60,433,100 $64,417,100 Before Airline Rebate Total Enplaned Passengers (EP) 9,902,846 9,778,248 9,165,141 9,195,684 9,195,684 Operating Expense/EP $4.59 $4.87 $5.85 $6.57 $7.01 5 YEAR OPERATING EXPENSE COMPARISON $70,000,000 -• ,,-- - , _.. ... - 12,000,000 1 I Total Operating Expense —T—Aotal Enplaned Passengers (EP) J I 1 1 $65,000,000 t A ,A4.0 1- 10,000,000 A "Y.7'Aip, $60,000,000 ;•<;;'=:;-;i2-,. '-i---';•t% '''' —8,000,000 itt) OG ta ;;IIW Ill (1) .:.:,:==i=c,fa' ,:,/• :;-;i..i. Z , ''':q6,'d ,,,,i:,,,,:t".i 0 a, $55,000,000 - ,-,':;.??4 ,i1.I---=',•;;-;--, LIJ .-';'•-;';',,,4 :;;,'!,--;-;:":-:- (I) W ,=-510;1•.; :,,-.,::.,!,;::P, < - 6,000,000 0. Z ;:n`.‘f•' „-,,--,y;;0 ,„; .., ILI i.:;-;;`,-i-;t' $50,000,000 -L =';'.;-.';;',';I.,' z OL ct.0 :, ,, , ,„ 9,00-=, z —4,000,000 111 $45,000,000 - * "= ..;;- 1; JIR,4-g :=.,'..." ; ,;-.1.,•1;ez.1.;-,,,, NI*;; ;,; .N,. ;,:,-,-,e,-,=%•4 'VI I 14° " 0 00 ,- -';:i•;:, A=.,:lra ' $40,000,000 - - -_;._:-,;',:, ‘;",t-:,4":;':•r:' ''-- 9,,i",:',4,,, $35,000,000 , '- -'- - 0 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 FISCAL YEAR 0 65 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS 0 OPERATING INCOME COMPARISON FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Operating Income Before Rebate $47,743,011 $47,050,137 $38,054,412 $29,786,100 $20,597,300 Total Enplaned Passengers (EP) 9,902,846 9,778,248 9,165,141 9,195,684 9,195,684 Operating Income/EP $4.82 $4.81 $4.15 $3.24 $2.24 5 YEAR OPERATING INCOME COMPARISON .............. . • • -,- 12,000,000 ------- I Operating Income Before Rebate I -: --A—Total Enplaned Passengers (EP) $45,000,000 — -,,,'-- - 10,000,000 $40,000,000 — 8,000,000 U1 $35,000,000 — ,'-: ';',`,s'• - .-......- U) .. •,,,,,..,,, lit Z CD 1111 ., „.: 11-0,: ,- :,. z cl, '-' w x .;,,,,-,:—I-r, !,-, ,Ai $.2r.v:--.1 ,,,,,.,4,,,::: 40 w „ .„ ,„. . ...,...„ „., . co CI $30,000,000 — -::- — 6,000,000 as 1-: ,-,1#5 -: ,•e!:- :: : , .. ,,,,,t-,.'.,-;1=',' ;:;!',ii,V.I., .2 ',1514;1?i; ,,,,,,-- -, -1-, ILI Z CU $25000000 — -,:-. ::-;ii-:•,,,,, ,• I'n!-l' ''."-:.!,i 11.1 4,000,000 $20,000,000 — — 2,000,000 ii:.= $15000,000 — , -.;!'-:•.,: ;-',1' .!,••N!'i,Y!!!!' ,r4i.i.,?6! grAfilw 011itht Agigl,,z: ...', a. $10,000,000 1 0 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 II FISCAL YEAR 66 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS LONG TERM DEBT COMPARISON PER TOTAL ENPLANED PASSENGERS FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Total Long Term Debt $137,179,297 $99,191,704 $112,858,826 $109,635,000 $62,670,000 Enplaned Passengers(EP) 9,902,846 9,778,248 9,165,141 9,195,684 9,195,684 Long Term Debt/EP $13.85 $10.14 $12.31 $11.92 $6.82 5 YEAR LONG TERM DEBT COMPARISON $150,000,000 ------------------•-- - 15,000,000 I ., I Total Long Term Debt f --Ar—Enplaned Passengers(EP) j $125,000,000 — 1 I- $100,000,000 "- : 10,000,000 :, 04 f;. V) 0 $75,000,000 — .` ., -. €__ ```; Q z ;'x: F Y' Elf.: fx'` >,: :' Q 1. $50,000,000 - . _ . < ",ii( °i' Z ;.-4; K..`s; 5,000,000 W r s5 $25,000,000 - s; o`s _-,,, :,$ s« - m£ V 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 FISCAL YEAR 67 SALT LAKE CITY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS LONG TERM DEBT COMPARISON PER LOCAL ENPLANED PASSENGERS FISCAL YEARS Actual Actual Actual Projection Budget 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 Total Long Term Debt $137,179,297 $99,191,704 $112,858,826 $109,635,000 $62,670,000 Local Enplaned Passengers 5,365,995 5,488,875 5,045,649 4,915,197 4,915,197 (LEP) Long Term Debt/LEP $25.56 $18.07 $22.37 $22.31 $12.75 5 YEAR LONG TERM DEBT COMPARISON $150,000,000 --__,__,__._ _______ . _ ______ _ - ____— 10,000,000 I 1 ` -`1 Total Long Term Debt ; —it—Local Enplaned Passengers $125,000,000 CY $100,000,000 ;f14' t,„, UJ W $75,000,000 -- l' ;:,,°'_,„ !`" �ir::f 1 — 5,000,000 Q $50,000,000 -,. _ 0 'Own,' y = �' - %,,,,g r:It -4, -�e3,sj ys4..,y<-veg,E� r2,' ,�gu`^ 25 000,000 -- ;=�1i-..-11 k € ' `s'' -$; ',4,,„€, a @k�:�'.1,: ' z^ -i a ` ,,, ,s 4, yM x .r”a;, rw y E,'x:Q -�_bittig x. z^ 3 x iliiii: : 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 FISCAL YEAR 110 68