Loading...
11/28/2017 - Work Session - Minutes MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 The City Council met in Work Session on Tuesday, November 28, 2017, in Room 326, Committee Room, City County Building, 451 South State Street. In Attendance: Council Members Erin Mendenhall, Derek Kitchen, Stan Penfold, Charlie Luke, James Rogers, Andrew Johnston, and Lisa Adams . Staff in Attendance: Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive Council Director; Jennifer Bruno, Executive Council Deputy Director; Patrick Leary, Mayor' s Chief of Staff; David Litvack, Mayor' s Deputy Chief of Staff; Paul Nielson, Senior City Attorney; Jacqueline Biskupski, Mayor; Wayne Mills, Planning Manager; Sean Murphy, Housing and Neighborhoods Project and Policy Manager; Nick Norris, Planning Director; Nick Tarbet, Council Senior Public Policy Analyst; Chris Lee, Principal Planner; Benjamin Luedtke, Council Public Policy Analyst; Melissa Jensen, Housing and Neighborhood Development Director; Mike Brown, Police Chief; Michael Maloy, Senior Planner; Lisa Shaffer, Public Services Director; and Scott Crandall, Deputy City Recorder. Others in Attendance: David Garbett, Pioneer Park Coalition. Councilmember Penfold presided at and conducted the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 4 : 10 p.m. AGENDA ITEMS #1 . 4:10:41 PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE THAT WOULD UPDATE THE CITY' S REGULATIONS IN THE FORM BASED URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD (FB-UN2) ZONING DISTRICT. View Attachments Nick Tarbet, Chris Lee, Nick Norris, and Wayne Mills briefed the Council with attachments . Mr. Tarbet said the Staff report contained the Planning Department' s response to four comments made by constituents at the September public hearing. Mr. Lee reviewed the responses with the Council . Comments included active uses (how to engage the sidewalk, ground floor) , Townhome restrictions (row house maximum) , design standards, setbacks/stepbacks, parking standards/legal uses, surface parking lot modifications, maximum building width, facade restrictions, development rights, buffer modification, and planned unit developments . Councilmember Mendenhall expressed concern about density 17 - 1 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 restrictions regarding townhomes . She said she thought there was a sense that the Council was looking for a variety of housing types and innovation in developments where smaller units could be utilized to increase density. Mr. Mills said the intent was not to limit density but to break up the building mass . He said the 200- foot building maximum was still being recommended for all Form- Based zoning Citywide. Councilmember Penfold said his concern was an unbroken 200' facade (variation needed) . Mr. Mills said the FB-UN2 zone had a number of design standards which controlled the facade (different building types required different entry features to break up facade) . Councilmember Mendenhall said there was also a concern that the back of a building could have the same 200' problem as the front (similar to Green Street) . Councilmember Adams said she was concerned about having really tall buildings and wondered if it was worth considering these parcel by parcel . Mr. Norris said that could create a number of legal challenges . He said other things could be explored like transferring on-site development rights (shift height to other parts of property) but felt more time was needed to study/determine options . Councilmember Penfold said he felt the concept of "active use" needed to be further defined. He said he was concerned about having buildings/complexes which covered long portions of a block- face that limited opportunities for activities or interaction with pedestrians along the sidewalk (walkable neighborhood) . He said this came up as part of the transit zone discussion. Mr. Norris said one of the Department' s priorities was to address this issue in a number of key zones . Councilmember Penfold said he was also concerned about seeing car-oriented apartment complexes being built adjacent to trax stops with no public use available . Straw Polls : • Support for reducing the active use depth from 25' to 10' as a minimum requirement (only applied to Cottage Developments, Row Houses, and Two-Family Dwellings) . All Council Members were in favor. • Support to remove the cap which currently existed for 3-5 units within the FB-UN2 zone (Row Houses) . All Council Members were in support. • Support to not revisit the current height restrictions in the 17 - 2 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 FB-UN2 zone . All Council Members were in favor, except Council Kitchen, who was opposed. Councilmember Mendenhall suggested holding a future discussion about this issue. • Support to explore allowing commercial parking in the FB-UN2 zone. All Council Members were in support of not allowing parking. #2 . 6:05:27 PM RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING REGARDING AN ORDINANCE THAT WOULD AMEND THE CITY' S ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs) REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO PETITION NO. PLNPCM2014-00447 . ADUs are small apartments that share a lot with a single-family home. They can be basement apartments, above and inside garages, or entirely separate buildings. The updated proposal could make this ordinance Citywide, but specialized boundaries instead of citywide are also still being considered. View Attachments Nick Tarbet, Nick Norris, Michael Maloy, and Paul Nielson briefed the Council with attachments . Councilmember Kitchen said he did not want this to go back to the Planning Commission or start over with new boundaries . He suggested moving forward with the South Temple and 1300 East boundary (everything north of Interstate 80 (I-80) and east of 1300 East would be excluded) . He said he wanted to remove the cap altogether and revisit the ordinance at some point in the future (potentially in three years) . Straw Polls: • Support to keep the boundary forwarded by the Planning Commission. Council Members Penfold, Kitchen, Johnston, Adams, and Luke were in favor. Council Members Mendenhall and Rogers were opposed. • Support to remove the annual cap of 25 ADUs . Council Members Penfold, Kitchen, Johnston, Adams, Mendenhall, and Luke were in favor. Councilmember Rogers was opposed. • Support to revisit the ADU ordinance in three years . All Council Members were in favor. Discussion was held on how/when to address the revisit process (legislative intent or sunset the ordinance) . Mr. Norris said there could be legal issues regarding any active ADUs, should the ordinance sunset . Councilmember Penfold said he wanted to postpone a straw poll until further review could be done on the legislative intent and sunset provision. He asked Staff to return next week with options . 17 - 3 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 Discussion was held on Item #2 (legislative intent language) . Councilmember Penfold said a straw poll would not be held due to concerns expressed about funding, Staff issues (research/costs) , and providing design/plans for public use. Discussion was held on requiring an owner-occupied affidavit to be included with the ADU application. Mr. Nielson said an affidavit was not the appropriate mechanism. He suggested making a more robust application which provided information to the applicant stating exactly what compliance was . Councilmember Penfold said he assumed the intent was to ensure the City adequately notified applicants of the requirements . Councilmember Mendenhall said she thought the intent was to give the City more legal ground if an owner moved out and started renting their property as a duplex. Councilmember Penfold asked about a mechanism to address that. Councilmember Rogers suggested filing a notice of interest with the County Recorder (like a deed restriction showing the unit was to be owner occupied) . Mr. Nielson said he thought that might work. Councilmember Rogers asked if an ADU owner had to adhere to the Good Landlord Program and if the owner' s property would also be assessed at a different rate since the property would be considered income producing. Councilmember Penfold asked the Administration to consider those issues and return to Council with a recommendation. Straw Poll: Support to allow ADUs (inside main structure) in local historic districts (did not remove boundary) . All Council Members were in favor. Councilmember Penfold said the issue would be scheduled for additional follow-up next week. #3 . 4:49:28PM RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING ABOUT "GROWING SLC: A 5-YEAR HOUSING PLAN. " The plan envisions Salt Lake City as a place where all its residents can find housing that is safe, secure and affordable. The plan outlines goals for creating long-term solutions for increasing the housing supply, expanding housing opportunities throughout the city, addressing systemic failures in the rental market, and preserving existing units. View Attachments Nick Tarbet, Melissa Jensen, Sean Murphy, and Benjamin Luedtke briefed the Council with attachments . Mr. Tarbet said discussion 17 - 4 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 was needed on changes made to Items 9-17 that were not discussed during the November 14, 2017 meeting. • 9. Issue addressed: Clarify funding options. Councilmember Kitchen asked that the sentence in the second paragraph, ending with "such as a levy or a bond" be expanded to include other things the Council was interested in such as short-term rental fees, impact fees, document recording fee, etc . • 10. Issue addressed: Local officials becoming advocates . Councilmember Mendenhall said her intent was to have a conversation with the Legislature about expanding allowable uses of impact fees for affordable housing. She suggested having the Council' s Legislative Subcommittee take that up as one of the policy objectives for the upcoming Legislative Session. Councilmember Luke said he agreed that should be added to the Subcommittee' s upcoming agenda. Councilmember Penfold said it might be helpful on a State level to explore options to help shore-up or even replace federal level tax incentives . Additional discussion was held on exploring opportunities to utilize/leverage surplus State/Federal lands for affordable housing (See Issue 8) . Councilmember Kitchen said a Citywide policy was needed to address surplus land. Councilmember Penfold suggested looking at a discounted/write-down option at the State level as well . He asked Ms . Jensen to check if that could accommodate not only market rate purchases, but write-downs, trades, exchanges, etc. so the City could get some key properties in that manner. Mr. Murphy said he would include that in the plan. Councilmember Kitchen suggested having donations go to the Community Land Trust. Ms . Jensen said updated language would be in the final redline version. • 11 . Issue addressed: Long-term funding for rental assistance. Councilmember Kitchen said the RDA had property tax reimbursement policies for economic development and thought there might be opportunity to do property tax reimbursement for properties that were developed for permanent supportive housing. Ms . Jensen said she would work with Economic Development/RDA Staff to see if that was legal/feasible and then adjust the plan accordingly. Councilmember Kitchen said he thought a policy discussion was needed within the RDA as well . He said having something included in this plan would be 17 - 5 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 helpful . • 12 . Issue addressed: Coordinating supportive services. Discussion was held on the definition of "deeply affordable housing" and providing appropriate services for that population. Ms . Jensen said HAND' s prospective was people who were at 30o Area Median Income (AMI) or below. Councilmember Penfold said his main concern was that some portion of the 30-40o AMI population would probably lose their housing at some point and wondered if there was a mechanism for connecting them to providers who could potentially provide some sort of "slight touch" case management. Ms . Jensen said she did not think there was a consistent model for that . Councilmember Penfold asked if it was worth calling that out in the plan. Ms . Jensen said she felt it was and would give the issue some thought and prepare redline text for the next briefing. Councilmember Johnston said he thought consideration was needed regarding the City' s role in defining/providing those services (included in the plan) . Ms . Jensen said she viewed the City' s role as a facilitator to help connect people with proper agencies . She said she would work on some language. Note: Councilmember Penfold was excused until 5 : 55 p.m. Councilmember Luke chaired the meeting in his absence . • 13 . Issue addressed: Highlight housing partners and need for marketing. (No objections) • 14 . Issue addressed: Clarify objective for neighborhood investments . (No objections) • 15. Issue addressed: Focus on improving neighborhood assets . (No objections) • 16. Issue addressed: Focus on producing affordable units in high opportunity neighborhoods. (No objections) • 17 . Issue addressed: Connection between population characteristics and production needs. (No objections) Councilmember Kitchen said he wanted language included in the plan showing it would follow any formal ADU discussions . Ms . Jensen 17 - 6 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 said she would send a final redline version to the Council next week and would include the language . Councilmember Luke said tentative action was scheduled on December 5, 2017 . #4 . 5:18:52PM RECEIVE A BRIEFING REGARDING BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 BUDGET. Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. This proposed amendment includes funding for Operation Rio Grande; possibly adding additional police officers; improvements at Pioneer Park that would remove the shuttered restrooms and open up the center of the park; and many other changes. View Attachments Jennifer Bruno, Benjamin Luedtke, Lisa Shaffer, and David Garbett briefed the Council with attachments . Discussion was held on the following items : A-7 : Pioneer Park Improvements Implementation Rescope ($544,000 - Capital Improvement Program - CIP) Councilmember Kitchen asked about the level of restroom cleanliness between 5 and 7 times a week. Ms . Shaffer said their records indicated there was not much difference but cost savings between 5 and 7 were more significant. Councilmember Adams said she understood there was a potential private match for improvements ($250-300, 000) . Ms . Shaffer said the Council' s packet was updated with that information and David Garbett, Pioneer Park Coalition, was available for questions . She said the Coalition was willing to donate up to $300, 000 conditioned on the approval of the budget amendment. Ms . Shaffer provide a brief history and said through their civic engagement process, she wanted to come back to the Council with clearly defined rules about what an implementation plan was versus a master plan. Ms . Gust Jenson said a master plan was presented to the Council in the past which they intentionally chose to adopt one section of and not the others . She said it was awkward to call those things an implementation plan. She said the other unusual part was the proposal was coming to the Council mid-year instead of through the annual budget process . Councilmember Kitchen asked about the politics of why the previous Council only adopted a small portion of the master plan. Ms . Gust-Jenson said there was a difference in the community about tree removal (how many could be taken out without changing the 17 - 7 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 entire character of the park) , some proposals were in competition with Gallivan, and the Council was unsure about whether to create a second venue which did similar things . She said there was one subsequent briefing and the issue had been dormant for a long time . She said the request coming in a budget opening was not typical because normally, it would come through the Mayor' s budget process and be considered with other CIP priorities . Councilmember Kitchen asked what the Council could do to give direction/clarity to Ms . Shaffer. Ms . Gust-Jenson said the Council could hold a briefing on what the proposal entailed, determine support for the concepts or not, review public input (determine whether there were still concerns with issues that were raised in the past) , look at any new issues, and then decide whether the Council wanted the proposal in pieces or as a whole through the regular budget process with CIP or in a mid-year budget amendment. Councilmember Adams said she thought the issue was more about providing safety in the area than bathrooms . She said she thought the proposal was interesting and liked that previously allocated funding was being utilized for another purpose in the park. Councilmember Rogers said regarding the master plan and implementation documents, he thought the Council needed to have a discussion about that but he preferred to have those types of proposals come to the Council through the normal budget process rather than through amendments . He reiterated the money allocated by the Council for the Portland Loo was never spent. He also said he supported the match requirement. Councilmember Johnston asked if the Pioneer Park Coalition funding match had any strings attached. Ms . Shaffer said the match was to be used specifically for lighting. She said if the proposed multi-use field/pathways were not created the lighting match would be irrelevant . Mr. Garbett said the Coalition wanted to contribute $300, 000 because he understood that was the approximate cost for lighting the field and walkways . Councilmember Johnston requested additional information about the proposed lighting, (i .e . did it follow the City' s lighting scheme) . Ms . Shaffer said a Certificate of Appropriateness was required from the Historic Landmark Commission before any construction could take place . Councilmember Johnston said he agreed the process for these types of issues needed to be looked at but felt the outcome was worth activating the space and handling funding appropriately/effectively. 17 - 8 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 Councilmember Mendenhall said she was in support of the proposal . She said she was comfortable doing this in a budget amendment in hopes the park would be ready for the summer season. Councilmember Kitchen said he was in support as well . He asked Ms . Shaffer to send him a PDF document of the proposed redesign. She said she would also include construction documents . Councilmember Luke said he was supportive and echoed the timing issues (budget amendment versus Mayor' s budget process) . He said this was not something the Council typically wanted to do in a budget opening but the project itself was definitely worthwhile and he looked forward to moving ahead. He said he was excited about the public/private partnership. He said although there was a lot of talk, the City had not seen many public/private partnerships . Councilmember Kitchen asked for an explanation of the process of creating public/private partnerships . Ms . Shaffer said her office spent a lot of time working on that issue. She said the partnership they envisioned for Pioneer Park started with conversations being held with the Coalition and their willingness to participate. She said the Department was in the process of creating a Management Plan for all City parks but specifically Pioneer Park. She said the Plan could inform any type of Request- For-Proposal (RFP) issued by the City and would include all of the standards the City found important for taking care of its public spaces . She said respondents to any RFP would have to meet those minimum standards . Discussion was held on the need to have a clearly defined policy regarding public/private partnerships . Councilmember Luke said the City previously adopted a Contribution and Naming Ordinance which could be used by the Administration/Council as a starting point. Councilmember Kitchen said it was important to treat taxpayers, constituents, and investment partners fairly. Councilmember Mendenhall said she hoped in the coming year the Council would hold a discussion about public/private partnerships . Straw Poll: Support to approve the Pioneer Park improvements implementation re-scope including up to a $300, 000 match from the Pioneer Park Coalition (submit future requests as part of regular budget) . All Council Members were in support, except Councilmember Penfold, who was excused. A-12 : Operation Rio Grande ($3 . 525 Million Total) . Mr. Luedtke said a chart was included in the attachment comparing additional 17 - 9 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 police officer scenarios by cost estimates (entry level) . Discussion was held on the Council' s interest in adding additional officers . Comments included: utilizing COP grants, additional responsibility/resources of Operation Rio Grande, intent to increase officers in neighborhoods (bike patrols) , public perception about safety, develop resident/police relationships, increase patrol division, potential public safety tax increase, phased approach, resources shifted to Operation Rio Grande, need for fully staffed department, budget/resource issues, tie budget discussions to actual outcomes/measures, community policing model, 23 beats/three shifts per day, 70o staffing model, staffing study needed to efficiently deploy officers, ratio of officers needed to address daytime/nighttime service populations, address feeling of safety and actual crime, and find ways to track perception of safety (track dispatch and response times) . Councilmember Luke said during the coming month, he wanted to have a broader discussion about different outcome measures the Council might want to consider. He said he wanted to see exactly how the Police Department planned to utilize additional officers within neighborhood policing and beat models . He said the Council had been very consistent about having a sufficient number of officers in City neighborhoods . Councilmember Rogers said he wanted to know what impact additional officers would have on the streets (how many per shift) . Chief Brown said he would come back before the next budget cycle to update the Council about the potential impact new officers would have on the department. Councilmember Johnston said this was a proxy measure toward the Council' s ultimate goal to address the community' s perception of safety and actual crime . He said the City had the ability to track different types of crime statistics but it also needed the ability to track perception of safety which might include dispatch and response times . He said depending on what outcomes the Council wanted to achieve, the City would have to look across departments to increase funding, which would require budgetary discussions . He said it was not just about getting $5 million to pay for officers, but was about how much would this cost to get the Council where it wanted to be . Councilmember Kitchen said he supported new officers but wanted to acknowledge this was a serious budgetary issue the Council would have to address in the near future . He said the 17 - 10 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 Council' s fundamental role was to ensure public health/well-being (including public safety) . He said in light of Operation Rio Grande and other things that had taken place in the City over the past couple of years, there really was a deficit in how City residents felt about safety. He said the feeling of insecurity was very real and this was an important step for the Council to take. Councilmember Penfold said this was long overdue . He said the Council was committed to supporting Chief Brown in his efforts in facing the challenge of reallocating limited resources, addressing the City' s day/night-time population needs, and determining a sufficient level of officers for public safety. He said the Council wanted to send a message that they appreciate the hard work of all officers . Straw Poll: Support to increase the proposed number of 27 new police officers to 50 . All Council Members were in support. Councilmember Luke said the budget amendment was scheduled to be voted on next week and asked Council Members to let Staff know if there were any additional concerns . #5 . HOLD A DISCUSSION REGARDING BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 (REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) BUDGET AMENDMENT NO. 3) . Budget amendments happen several times each year to reflect adjustments to the City's budgets, including proposed project additions and modifications. The proposed amendment includes a proposal to use RDA for affordable housing projects. View Attachments Item pulled. #6 . RECEIVE A FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING ABOUT AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TRANSIT MASTER PLAN. The plan evaluates the City's travel patterns and transit needs and makes recommendations about transit service, infrastructure, supportive investments and policies for the next 20 years. The plan also includes recommendations, implementation strategies, and potential funding sources. View Attachments Item pulled. #7 . 6:33:38 PM INTERVIEW NICOLE SALAZAR-HALL PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2021 . View Attachments 17 - 11 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 Councilmember Penfold said Ms . Salazar-Hall' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . #8 . 6:41:20 PM INTERVIEW ELLEN REDDICK PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2020 . View Attachments Councilmember Penfold said Ms . Reddick' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . #9 . 6:47:33 PM INTERVIEW TERRY LAKE PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BOARD FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2020 . View Attachments Councilmember Penfold said Ms . Lake' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . #10 . 6:47:33PM INTERVIEW RYAN PARKER PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE HOUSING TRUST FUND ADVISORY BOARD FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2020 . View Attachments Councilmember Penfold said Mr. Parker' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . #11 . 6:49:49PM INTERVIEW BEVERLY LANGUE PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HER APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND EXAMINERS FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2022 . View Attachments Councilmember Penfold said Ms . Langue' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . #12 . INTERVIEW DAVE ROBINSON PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND EXAMINERS FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2022 . View Attachments Item pulled. #13 . 6:49:56PM INTERVIEW DOUG THIMM PRIOR TO CONSIDERATION OF HIS APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS AND EXAMINERS FOR A TERM EXTENDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 28 , 2022 . View Attachments Councilmember Penfold said Mr. Thimm' s name was on the Consent Agenda for formal consideration . 17 - 12 MINUTES OF THE SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28 , 2017 #14 . (TENTATIVE) RECEIVE AN UPDATE FROM THE ADMINISTRATION REGARDING HOMELESS SERVICES . Item not held. #15 . (TENTATIVE) RECEIVE AN UPDATE REGARDING THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT. Item not held. #16 . 6:53:46PM REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INCLUDING A REVIEW OF COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items. See File M 17-5 for announcements . #17 . REPORT OF THE CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR. No discussion was held. #18 . CONSIDER A MOTION TO ENTER INTO CLOSED SESSION, IN KEEPING WITH UTAH CODE §52-4-205 FOR ANY ALLOWED PURPOSE . Item not held. The meeting adjourned at 6 : 56 p.m. COUNCIL CHAIR CITY RECORDER This document is not intended to serve as a full transcript as other items may have been discussed; please refer to the audio or video for entire content. This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the City Council Work Session meeting held November 28, 2017 . sc 17 - 13