10/02/1990 - Minutes PROCE DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY,OCTOBER 2, 1990
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of
the Whole on Tuesday, October 2, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City
Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale
Nancy Pace
Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting.
Councilmember Hardman called changes. He said the new process
the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. would be in accordance with the
SLACC and their early notifica-
tion requirements. He said the
ordinance applied to residential
BOARD INTERVIEW areas where no demolition or
landscaping plans had been filed.
The Council interviewed
Betsy Sutherland prior to consid- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
eration of her appointment to the
Salt Lake Arts Council. She said Ms. Gust-Jenson reviewed the
her interest was due to her pro- agenda for the Council meeting
fession as an art teacher for the and noted a few minor changes
Jordan School District and she listed on the addendum. She said
had a personal interest in art. she would be preparing a proposal
She said the time she devoted to for the Council to consider as a
the Council would not be a prob- part of the budget opening. She
lem. Councilmember Hale offered distributed an updated events
some general information about calendar. She told the Council
Ms. Sutherland and said he sup- that the Community Development
ported her appointment. Coordinator' s position had closed
and interviews were to be sched-
DEMOLITION ORDINANCE BRIEFING uled for October 18 and 19 of
1990.
Roger Evans, Director of
Building and Housing, provided a The meeting adjourned at 5:30
briefing to the Council concern- p.m
ing the proposed demolition ordi-
nance. He reviewed the changes
in the ordinance from the at-
tached list. He said those who
would appear at the hearing to-
night would be demolition con-
tractors and they might object to
the process being lengthened. He
said he did not anticipate any
comments concerned with the fee
90-313
PROCE INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on
Tuesday, October 2, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council
Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale
Nancy Pace
Mayor Palmer DePaulis, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn
Marshall, City Recorder, and Misty Jo Zemp, Deputy Recorder, were
present.
Council Chair Hardman presided at and Councilmember Godfrey
conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONIES #1. RE: Set a date to hold a
public hearing on Thursday, Octo-
#1. Michael Denos, Police Chap- ber 18, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. to
lain, gave the invocation. receive public comment and con-
sider adopting an ordinance
#2. The Council led the amending Salt Lake City Ordinance
Pledge of Allegiance. No. 69 of 1990 which approved
ratified, and finalized the bud-
#3. Councilmember Whitehead get of Salt Lake City, Utah for
moved and Councilmember Hardman the fiscal year beginning July 1,
seconded to approve the minutes 1990 and ending June 30, 1991.
of the Salt Lake City Council for (B 90-3)
the regular meeting held Tuesday,
September 18, 1990, which motion #2. RE: Adopting Resolution
carried, all members voted aye. #100 of 1990 authorizing the
(M 90-1) execution of an interlocal coop-
eration agreement between Salt
PUBLIC COMMENTS Lake City Corporation and the
Utah State Retirement Board to
#1. RE: Norma Amodt, 950 make available a group insurance
Jefferson Street, said she wanted program to City employees.
to thank the Mayor and the City (C 90-561)
Council for solving the truck
problem. She said the barriers NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS
had been set up and there was no
longer a problem. #1. RE: Consider adopting
an ordinance amending Chapters
CONSENT AGENDA 16, 44, and 72 of Title 17 of the
Salt Lake City Code relating to
Councilmember Hale moved and the culinary water system, waste-
Councilmember Kirk seconded to water control, and sewer system.
approve the consent agenda, which (0 90-41)
motion carried, all members voted
aye. ACTION: Councilmember Kirk
moved and Councilmember Hardman
seconded to suspend the rules and
90-314
1110
PROCEeDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI* UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
adopt Ordinance 83 of 1990, which #7. RE: Consider the ap-
motion carried, all members voted pointment of Mark L. Lawrence to
aye. the Salt Lake Arts Council.
(0 90-41)
ACTION: Without objection
#2. RE: Consider the reap- Councilmember Godfrey referred
pointment of Sharon Alderman to this item to the Committee of the
the Salt Lake Arts Council. Whole.
(I 90-16)
ACTION: Without objection
Councilmember Godfrey referred #8. RE: Consider the ap-
this item to the Consent Agenda. pointment of Perrin R. Love to the
(I 90-16) Salt Lake Arts Council.
#3. RE: Consider the ap- ACTION: Without objection
pointment of Curley Jones to the Councilmember Godfrey referred
Community Development Advisory this item to the Committee of the
Committee. Whole.
(I 90-16)
ACTION: Without objection
Councilmember Godfrey referred #9. RE: Consider the ap-
this item to the Consent Agenda. pointment of Lynn M. Hilton to the
(I 90-2) Urban Forestry Board.
#4. RE: Consider the ap- ACTION: Without objection
pointment of Jerry Stranger to the Councilmember Godfrey referred
Salt Lake Arts Council. this item to the Committee of the
Whole.
ACTION: Without objection (I 90-15)
Councilmember Godfrey referred
this item to the Committee of the #10. RE: Consider the reap-
Whole. pointment of Stan Roberts to the
(I 90-16) Salt Lake Arts Council.
#5. RE: Consider the ap- ACTION: Without objection
pointment of Rick Ith to the Salt Councilmember Godfrey referred
Lake Arts Council. this item to the Consent Agenda.
(I 90-16)
ACTION: Without objection
Councilmember Godfrey referred #11. Consider approving the
this item to the Committee of the reappointment of D'Arcy Dixon
Whole. Pignanelli to the Salt Lake Arts
(I 90-16) Council.
#6 RE: Consider the appoint- ACTION: Without objection
ment of Ann S. Berman to the Salt Councilmember Godfrey referred
Lake Arts Council. this item to the Consent Agenda.
(I 90-16)
ACTION: Without objection
Councilmember Godfrey referred #12. Consider the reappoint-
this item to the Committee of the ment of Bernice Cook to the Commu-
Whole. nity Development Advisory Commit-
(I 90-16) tee.
90-315
PROC INGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CM UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
ACTION: Without objection Attorneys Office. He said to
Councilmember Godfrey referred include comments heard tonight and
this item to the Consent Agenda. provide the Community Councils
(I 90-2) with an administrative draft
within ten days, which motion
#13 RE: Consider the reap- carried, all members voted aye.
pointment of Nancy Saxton to the
Community Development Advisory DISCUSSION: Roger Evans,
Committee. Director of Building and Housing,
said in the last couple of years
ACTION: Without objection the issue of demolition and the
Councilmember Godfrey referred demolition ordinance had come up
this item to the Consent Agenda. between the different Community
(I 90-2) Councils based upon the concerns
expressed by the different groups
#14. RE: Consider the ap- in the City. He said the Building
pointment of Betsy Sutherland to and Housing staff had prepared a
the Salt Lake Arts Council. revised ordinance on demolition
of buildings. He said this ordi-
ACTION: Councilmember Hale nance had been before the Housing
moved and Councilmember Whitehead and Advisory Appeals Board. Mr.
seconded to suspend the rules and Evans said the changes which took
approve the appointment of Betsy place in the ordinance dealt with
Sutherland to the Salt Lake Arts one notification requirement to
Council, which motion carried, all adjoining property owners within a
members voted aye. 600 foot radius, and had taken
(I 90-16) away the discretionary powers of
building officials. He said all
PUBLIC HEARINGS waivers of landscaping would go
before the Housing and Advisory
#1. RE: A hearing at 6:20 Appeals Board.
p.m. to receive public comment and
consider adopting an ordinance Mr. Evans said all comments on
amending Chapter 64 of Title 18 administrative charges, filing
dealing with demolishing build- charges for notification, and a
ings. mandatory waiting period could be
received by the different communi-
ACTION: Councilmember Kirk ties. He said this would allow
moved and Councilmember Whitehead everyone to be notified and ex-
seconded to close the public press their comments about the
hearing, no vote was taken. process. He said a lot of housing
stock would be boarded up and
Councilmember Hardman moved preserved until the City addressed
and Councilmember Horrocks second- the issue of boarded up structures
ed to continue the public hearing throughout the City in their
to Tuesday November 20, 1990, and housing policy plans. He said the
that interested parties be given intent was to maintain the housing
the opportunity to review the and preserve the buildings. He
final draft, which motion carried, said the City had tried to reha-
all members voted aye. bilitate the structures and were
slowing down the whole process of
Councilmember Hardman moved demolition and landscaping which
and Councilmember Horrocks second- had been occurring in the City.
ed to refer the ordinance to the Mr. Evans said it was a good
90-316
PROCIDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI I UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
change in the ordinance and ad- Mr. Evans said property owners
dressed the concerns some of the were allowed to take out a permit
Community Councils had expressed and perform their own work. He
in the notification process. He said this was governed by State
said the other item would be to Statue.
slightly change the fee structure
on the present charges that were Eldon Marshall, Vice Chair of
being charged for demolitions. the Salt Lake Westside Community
Council, said he was concerned in
Mr. Evans said under the his area there was nothing to
present demolition ordinance if a identify that the community was
property was to be demolished in deteriorating. He said on 700
Salt Lake City it required two South between 1500 West and 800
things; 1 ) a permit must be sub- West there were nine abandoned
mitted for the reuse of the prop- houses and five of those were
erty, and 2) the applicant must boarded up. He said it was
present a landscaping plan with a difficult to evaluate the impact
sprinkling system. He said the it had on a community. He was
present ordinance gave the build- concerned it would encourage the
ing officials some discretion in same type of situation the City
commercial areas and right now the had. He said there were some
City was taking input from the areas in the City that would
different community chairpersons. benefit from demolishing old and
He said those comments were rout- abandoned homes, but his area was
ed through the Building and Hous- not one of them and he feared the
ing office and the Mayors office. ordinance applied to the whole
City when it did not fit.
He said the Mayor had been
reviewing the comments on a case Mr. Evans said if the Housing
by case basis. Mr. Evans said if Committee received a request in a
favorable input was received from particular area this would not
the Community Council Chairper- prohibit demolition. They would
son, the City had the applicant notify the people in the given
sign a demolition consent and area and they would be able to
waiver form and then the demoli- come before the Housing Advisory
tion permit was issued. He said Board to express their concerns.
the criticism the City had been He said if the Board felt the
faced with during the process was concerns were valid they could
the Chairperson did not represent waive the landscaping.
the feelings of the Community
Council and in order to rectify Ron Love, East Central Commu-
this problem the City had a noti- nity Council, 1073 East 600 South,
fication requirement. was concerned with the process in
which $60 could demolish his
Councilmember Hardman asked house. He was also concerned the
under Section 64. 100 of the ordi- Planning Commission had not looked
nance that referred to the "quali- at the impact the plan might have
fication to do work", if this on the city planning process. He
would require the hiring of a said he had received a notice
contractor or subcontractor to within the last thirty days of
tear down a minor accessory build- this hearing and the East Central
ing. City Community Council had not
met. Mr. Love said the people of
this area had not had an opportu-
90-317
PROC DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CI'i'Y UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
nity to give any input and this members would determine whether to
had not been an issue before the waive the post-demolition use
Salt Lake Community Council Board. landscaping requirements and
He said he felt this kind of schedule a hearing date no sooner
process was necessary before the than fifteen days from the date
City made it an ordinance. of the petition and no later than
thirty days from the date of the
Councilmember Godfrey said the petition. " She said the ordinance
process was to go through the should be cleared up so the people
Community Council before a house understood it was the panel making
could be demolished. Mr. Love the final decision and that it
said he felt it would encourage would not be overturned by the
people to tear down homes and he board.
said the fee for tearing down
homes was too low. Carol Mall, Co-chair of the
Central City Neighborhood Council,
Willis Dorman, 634 East 700 said the issue of demolition had
South, said some of the language not been brought to their meeting
in the ordinance was unclear. She and she wanted to have more dis-
referred to page three, item C of cussion before the ordinance was
the ordinance and said there was adopted.
some confusion about the $100 fee
that a person was required to pay Stan Penfold, 1015 East 2nd
for inspection of the property. Ave, said the ordinance was not
She said on page four, the ordi- intended to discourage demolition
nance required a $170 fee for a of a property. He said he had a
landscaping waiver. Ms. Dorman few concerns which were clarifica-
said there should be a section tion problems. He said the fees
which stated if a landscaping required for a landscape waiver
waiver had been approved, one on page three, item C, listed a
would be able to get a demolition $100 fee which would be refundable
permit. She said on page four, if a waiver was not granted, and
item C, it stated "in the event of on page four there was a $170
a force majeure" , and she said it processing fee, and on page five,
should be changed to catastrophic item B, there was a $50 applica-
event because more people would be tion fee. He said there should be
able to understand it. a single fee in order to get an
application going to make it more
She said the next item in clear. He said under the notifi-
18. 64.050 was "written notice to cation requirement on the bottom
owners and residents of proper- of page four under "residents
ties. " She said written notice dwelling unit" , there was a re-
needed to be sent to the property quirement to notify property
owners and to those occupants who owners within a 600 foot radius.
do not own the property but are
residing there. She said there Mr. Penfold said he would like
should be some other way to to see a "notification of the
notify residents besides a tax recognized Community Councils
roll because tax rolls were not Organization where the effected
always accurate. property was located" be included
in the ordinance on page four and
Ms. Dorman said on page six it on page five, item C, where it had
stated that a "panel of three a notification process. He said
examiners from the roster of it was important the recognized
90-318
PROIRDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CIPY UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
Community Councils were informed Councilmember Godfrey asked if
because many were interested in the Council would be interested in
demolitions in their neighbor- directing Roger Evans on certain
hoods. issues and to make a list of
things to be included in the
Councilmember Pace said there ordinance.
was already a provision for noti-
fying neighborhood based organiza- Councilmember Pace said there
tions pursuant to Section were a number of items which
2.60.020. needed to be cleared up in the
ordinance.
Mr. Penfold said his copy of
the ordinance did not have this Roger Cutler, City Attorney,
item included, asked if all the items were to be
included and if he could meet with
Roger Evans said there were the Council and discuss some of
three or four different versions the items.
of the ordinance because the
Housing Committee had been working Cindy Gust-Jenson, Executive
on this ordinance for a year. He Director of the Council, said the
said the fee issue had been time frame to reschedule the
brought up very intensively. He public hearing was adequate and
said the Housing Committee had to she would have a list of the items
lower the fee to justify the fee made up. She said she would give
schedule. Mr. Evans said there the Council a memo after Mr.
had been some revisions made and Cutler had reviewed the ordinance.
the Housing Committee would make She said she would then send the
new copies of the updated ordi- information out to the Community
nance. Councils.
Mr. Penfold said the hearing Councilmember Hardman said
should be continued at another SLACC should send out the infor-
time so people could read over the mation to the various councils to
ordinance and clear up some of schedule it in their agendas.
their concerns.
Councilmember Godfrey said the
Councilmember Pace asked if items should be referred to the
the Community Councils would be Council staff, the Attorneys
notified and if SLACC would have Office, and Building and Housing
an opportunity to deal with the so they could make something
issue. available to the community coun-
cils. He said this would allow
Councilmember Hardman said it the Council to hear public com-
was necessary to receive public ments.
review on the ordinance. He said
additional input or minor modifi- Mr. Cutler said some of the
cations may need to be given to comments made tonight were benefi-
redefine what the City was doing. cial and could be incorporated
He said the community councils and into the ordinance without much
interested parties would be given controversy. He said he needed
a single version of the ordinance ten days to work with the Council
to review. staff, receive the minutes, and to
get a new draft of the ordinance
out to the Community Councils and
90-319
PROC•DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE COPY UTAH
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1990
interested parties. He said this
would clear up some of the con-
cerns they might have and they
would be able to understand the
ordinance.
(0 90-39)
The meeting adjourned at 6:55
p.m. .070mmviltht.
COUNCIL HAIR ` .fir
90-320
,
Cu I Pnd ar
/ SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL �L�',` (cun{`1
' AGENDA j1 Y
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
ROOM 315 --—
CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING . t I
451 SOUTH STATE STREET Uns
Tuesday, October 2, 1990
6:00 p.m:
A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County
Building, 451 South State
1. Report of the Executive Director.
2. The Council will receive a briefing concerning proposed amendments
olition ordinance.
3. iae deg
B. OPENING EHEMONIES:
• 1. Invocation.
2. Pledge of Allegiance.
3. Approval of the minutes.
C. COMMENTS:
1. Questions to the Mayor from the City Council .
2. Citizen Comments to the Council.
D. CONSENT: \1(\
()\-- ) r*
1. Ordinance: Budget Amendment #1 i\1 �- v
Set date to hold a hearing on October 18, 1990 at 5:00 p.m. to
receive public comment and consider adopting an ordinance amending
Salt Lake City Ordinance No. 69 of 1990 which approved, ratified
and finalized the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal
year beginning July 1 , 1990 and ending June 30, 1991 .
(B 90-3) - Paper(Do Avk;lable &fiber lb. ',x ►Cfili'c` h r' oil
Staff recommendation: Set date. 0C-- I(p
b1Our , k.1AaCk.
Or) t mQm ( LIP--
2. Resolution: Interlocal Agreement / Group Insurance U q
Consider adopting a resolution authorizing the execution of an
Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake City
Corporation and the Utah State Retirement Board to make available
a group insurance program to City employees.
(C 90-561)
Staff recommendation: Adopt.
7. Board Appointment
Consider the approving the appointment of Mark L. Lawrence to the
Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Refer to Committee of the
Whole.
8. Board Appointment
Consider the approving the appointment of Perrin R. Love to the
Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Refer to Committee of the
Whole.
9. Board Appointment
Consider the approving the appointment of Lynn M. Hilton to the
Urban Forestry Board.
(I 90-15)
Staff recommendation: Refer to Committee of the
Whole.
10. Board Reappointment
Consider the approving the reappointment of Stan Roberts to the
Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Refer to Committee of the
Whole.
11. Board Reappointment
Consider approving the reappointment of D'Arcy Dixon Pignanelli to
the Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Refer to consent.
12. Board Reappointment
Consider approving the reappointment of Bernice Cook to the
Community Development Advisory Committee.
(I 90-2)
Staff recommendation: Refer to consent.
DATED: September 28, 1990
BY:
CIT C RDER
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss.
On the 28th day of September, 1990 I personally delivered a copy
of the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted
copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and
locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah:
1 . At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and
2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343.
ITY RECORDER
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28th day of September, 1990.
v
i
otary pub c es' ing in the
State of Utah
My Commission Expires :
r' _ .1
9 f 5�,., F4AlGt{T I
• �
E : :�.�. . 451 80.Mire 3t Rrn 415 1
Salt Lnlaa City,Utah 841tY2 1
�APPROV� K. � As':a'lo��Ug I
-� tic ,��cc �- �
1A-1E CUTIVE DIRE TOR�—
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
ADDENDUM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
ROOM 315
CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING
451 SOUTH STATE STREET
Tuesday, October 2, 1990
6:00 p.m.
A. BRIEFING SESSION: 5:00 - 5:55 p.m. , Room 325 City and County
Building, 451 South State
3. The Council will interview Betsy Sutherland prior to consideration
of her appointment to the Arts Council.
B. OPENING CEREMONIES:
C. COMMENTS:
D. CONSENT:
E. NEW BUSINESS:
2. Board Appointment
Consider the approving the reappointment of Sharon Alderman to the
Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Refer to consent.
•
14. Board Appointment
Consider the approving the appointment of Betsy Sutherland to the
Salt Lake Arts Council.
(I 90-16)
Staff recommendation: Suspend and approve.
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
H. ADJOURNMENT.
**FINAL ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AND/OR ORDINANCES ADOPTED CONCERNING ANY ITEM ON
THIS AGENDA.
DATED: October 1 , 1990
BY:
IT CORDER
STATE OF UTAH )
COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) ss.
On the 1st day of October, 1990 I personally delivered a copy of
the foregoing notice to the Mayor and City Council and posted
copies of the same in conspicuous view, at the following times and
locations within the City and County Building, 451 South State
Street , Salt Lake City, Utah:
1 . At 5:00 p.m. in the City Recorder's Office, Room 415; and
2. At 5:00 p.m. in the Newsroom, Room 343.
ITY RECORDS
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of October, 1990.
Al )
-/ /,/ram_ ►'� :« ' �/
Notary P bli ding in the
State of Utah
•
My Commission Expires :
r
1 -J
�,J:g -�> Plot�r' Pudic
I
'': ?:# 451 So.Slue St Rm 415 I
�+a� ` Salt Lake Cny
� -�`�j �y Cammiee�en�p��,'rei2�
P P' 'OVAL• August 1, 1r-3 1
l _
r 01 civ ',77) s6\__
(I
EXECUTIVE DIRECTO
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met as the Committee of
the Whole on Tuesday, September 18, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in Room 325, City
Council Office, City County Building, 451 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale
Nancy Pace
Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting.
Councilmember Hardman called Tuesday.Councilmember Horrocks
the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. asked if the November 13th meeting
would be appropriate for the
Agenda Item D-2: Brighton Ski hearing.
Area Master Plan authorizing a
memorandum of understanding with Councilmember Hardman
the named local and State suggested they switch the October
governmental agencies to study llth meeting agenda with the
said plan. Ms. Gust-Jensen said October 16th agenda. The
this was a resolution to form a petitioner would want the hearing
committee to study the plan and set as soon as possible. There
would involve no funding or was unanimous agreement to the
further actions by the Council. rescheduling. Ms. Gust-Jenson
reminded the Council of the field
Agenda Item E-1: To set a tour of this proposal on Monday
hearing date for Petition No.s September 24, 1990 from 4:00-6:00
400-768 and 400-842 in regards to p. m.
Ensign Downs. Councilmember Pace
said this would be a controversial Agenda Item Fl- Resolution:
hearing and requested the Council Gelco Finance. Dick Fox explained
hold the hearing at the same time the Industrial Revenue Bond
as the land trade hearing between financing needed a letter of
the City Administration and Ensign credit in place to draw down on
Downs. She said it would be Industrial Revenue Bonds. This
helpful and expedient to do so. foreign firm would make printed
The non-advertised land trade circuit boards for computers.
hearing would be held the same
night, and be conducted by the Agenda Item G-1: Ordinance:
Mayor. East Downtown Master Plan
Councilmember Hardman said most of
Councilmember Godfrey said he the people which would attend
would not be here October 16, 1990 tonight' s hearing, were in favor
for the discussed hearing date. of the plan.
He said October 23, 1990 would be
more preferable if it could be Agenda Item G-2: Ordinance
worked out with the Community Amendment: Theater Arena Parking.
Councils. Councilmember Hardman Bill Wright, Deputy Director of
asked if the meeting could be held the Planning Division, said this
on some day other than amendment was proposed to address
90-306
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
the needs of the Utah Jazz Arena,
and to acknowledge the situation
existing with the Salt Palace and
Symphony Hall.
Emilie Charles said
Neighborhood Housing Services was
interested in meeting with the
Council to discuss housing issues.
Councilmember Hardman suggested
the arrangement be made through
the Council staff.
The meeting adjourned at 5:30
p.m
90-307
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
The City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, met in Regular Session on
Tuesday, September 18, 1990, at 6:00 p.m. in Room 315, City Council
Chambers, City County Building, 451 South State Street.
The following Council Members were present:
Ronald Whitehead Alan Hardman Roselyn Kirk
Wayne Horrocks Tom Godfrey Don Hale
Nancy Pace
Acting Mayor Mike Zuhl, Roger Cutler, City Attorney, Kathryn
Marshall, City Recorder, and Misty Jo Zemp, Deputy Recorder, were
present.
Council Chair Hardman presided at and conducted the meeting.
OPENING CEREMONIES prostitutes because it was just as
illegal to pick up a prostitute as
#1. Ms. Lavon Young, a re- it was to be one, and 2) to pass
gional Eck Spiritual Aid from and enforce an ordinance which
Eckankar, gave the invocation. prohibited motel owners to allow
prostitutes to rent rooms, or at
#2. The Council led the Pledge least limit the number of times an
of Allegiance. individual can rent a room in one
day.
#3. Councilmember Kirk moved
and Councilmember Whitehead sec- Councilmember Horrocks asked
onded to approve the minutes of Mr. Robins if he had been attend-
the Salt Lake City Council for the ing the Peoples Freeway Community
regular meeting held Tuesday, Council meetings or the South
September 11, 1990, which motion Central council meetings. He said
carried, all members voted aye. these committees were involved in
(M 90-1 ) working on this problem. He said
these committees had appeared
PUBLIC COMMENTS twice before the Salt Lake County
Commissioner asking for more
#1. RE: Bill Robins, who available jail space for the
resides on Roberta Street and 1700 prostitutes in the City. He said
South, which is located two blocks the jails were a county function
off of State Street, said the and the City had been working with
prostitutes were working one block the County Commission for the past
away from his home. He said he two years trying to solve the
was concerned that prostitution problems of the jails. He said
had reduced property values. He new jails were being built and
said it was unfair to the children these problems would be taken care
in the area to be exposed to pros- of. He said the Mayor and the
titution . He asked Acting Mayor City Council were doing all they
Mike Zuhl, if he would consider could to change prostitution in
looking into the issue. Mr. Salt Lake City.
Robins said he had two
suggestions: 1 ) to arrest the Councilmember Godfrey said he
customers who pick up the liked the ideas Mr. Robins had
90-308
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
suggested. He said making arrests NEW COUNCIL BUSINESS
and creating an ordinance on the
motels, was something administra- #1. RE: Set a date to hold a
tion should look at and consider. public hearing on October 16,
1990, at 6:30 p.m. to receive
Roger Cutler, City Attorney, public comment and consider rezon-
said the City had an active decoy ing the property located at ap-
program which involved arresting proximately 1100 East Capitol
people trying to pick up the Boulevard, approximately 10 Dorch-
prostitutes. The Sex Oriented ester, and west of Ensign Peak at
Business ordinance deals with the approximately 1000 North Street
hot sheets motels in the area. He from "R-1" to an "R-1A" classifi-
said the City had warned the cation.
County if they did not make more
jail space available, problems
would begin on State Street. Mr. ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey
Cutler said more jail space had moved and Councilmember Hale
been made available and he would seconded to change the date of
check to see if there was time of the hearing to October
something that could be done 11, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. , which
about an ordinance. motion carried, all members voted
aye.
CONSENT AGENDA (P 90-317)
Councilmember Godfrey moved UNFINISHED COUNCIL BUSINESS
and Councilmember Pace seconded
to approve the consent agenda #1. RE: Adopting a Resolu-
which motion carried, all members tion authorizing the execution of
voted aye the first supplement to a lease-
purchase agreement by and between
#1. RE: Adopting Ordinance Gelco Finance Corporation, as
82 1990 amending Sections 5.26. 100 lessor, and Salt Lake City as
and 12 . 56 .330 of the Salt Lake lessee, dated as of December 15,
City Code, relating to freight 1989, and a first supplement to a
license stickers attached to sublease-purchase agreement by and
vehicle loading zones and freight between Salt Lake City as subless-
curb respectively. or and Compeq International Co. ,
(0 90-40) Ltd. , as sublessee, dated as of
December 15, 1989.
#2. RE: Adopting Resolution
99 of 1990 authorizing the approv- ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey
al of a memorandum of understand- moved and Councilmember Pace
ing between Salt Lake City Corpo- seconded to adopt Resolution 98
ration and Wasatch, Cache and of 1990, which motion carried, all
Uinta National Forests, Salt Lake members voted aye, except
County, Wasatch County, Utah Councilmember Hardman who ab-
State Parks and Recreation, the stained from the vote.
City of Midway, and Utah Division (Q 89-3)
of Wildlife Resources concerning
the review and assessment of the PUBLIC HEARINGS
proposed Brighton Ski Area Master
Plan. #1. RE: A hearing at 6:20
(C 90-521 ) p.m. to receive public comment and
consider adopting an ordinance
90-309
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
adopting the East Downtown Master He said the second objective
Plan. was to improve and preserve the
character of the area. He said
ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey there was a problem with security
moved and Councilmember Whitehead and crime in the East Downtown
seconded to close the public Area. He said the Planning Com-
hearing, which motion carried, all mission wanted to create a pedes-
members voted aye. trian environment and create
activity on the streets so people
Councilmember Whitehead moved would be able to live, work, and
Councilmember Horrocks seconded to receive all the amenities they
adopt Ordinance 81 of 1990, which needed.
motion carried, all members voted
aye. He said the third objective
was the strong economic force in
DISCUSSION: Bruce Parker, the neighborhood was a result of
Planning and Zoning, said there transportation, traffic patterns,
had been a series of meetings held and the area' s proximity to the
last year to inform the residents amenities of the downtown area
of the area of the East Downtown along with the character and the
Master Plan. He said this was an amount of commercial
area which had close ties with redevelopment in the downtown
areas such as the downtown area, area.
the East Central neighborhood, the
Lower Avenues, and the South He said the Planning Commis-
Central part of the City. He said sion had asked for the development
the East Downtown Master Plan had of a mixed use zone where the
to be viewed as an overall part of primary use would be residential.
Salt Lake City. He said the main He said other uses would be
principles of the plan were to allowed which were compatible and
create a vibrant mix use urban harmonious with the residential
neighborhood for Salt Lake City. use. Mr. Parker said the second
He said this area had great poten- mix use zone would be for
tial for an increase in population businesses in scale with the
and would provide a strong popula- neighborhood which would provide
tion base for the Central City amenities and services desired by
area. Mr. Parker said there were residents of the community. He
a few objectives to the East Down- said the final zone would be an
town Master Plan. He said the office mix use zone to be
first objective was to place designated along the 5th and 6th
emphasis on housing and popula- south corridors where a
tion because this area had con- significant amount of office
tinued to decline in population development existed.
over the last twenty years. He
said there had been a decline in He said the Planning Commis-
residential housing because of sion wanted the "R-7" zone in the
demolitions and new commercial area to be eliminated, because
development in the area. Mr. they felt it was the reason popu-
Parker said it was felt population lation had moved out of the down-
would continue to decline in this town area. He said it had been
area unless the Master Plan was proposed to create the new mix use
put into effect. zone and have the "R-7" zone be
incorporated into it.
90-310
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
Lois Brown, Central City should get the Redevelopment
Service Plan, supported the East Agency involved by letting people
Downtown Master Plan. She said it acquire enough ground to build on.
was important that the public con-
tinue to be involved with future Kim Anderson, North Redwood
plans of the City. She thanked Road, supported the East Downtown
the Planning Division for includ- Master Plan, but was concerned
ing the public and their ideas in with the area around Trolley
the East Downtown Master Plan. Square. He said he felt the
building height requirement of 75
Susan Hardy, Director of the feet would destroy the look of
Salt Lake Community Development Trolley Square, and he would like
Corporation, supported the devel- to see the requirement of the
opment of the East Downtown buildings around Trolley Square
Master Plan and wanted to see it limited to the height of existing
adopted. She said she felt the buildings.
plan would increase the population
of the downtown area and improve Mr. Parker said the Trolley
the character of it. Square block was under the review
of the Historical Landmark Commit-
Willis Dorman, Central City, tee for proposed development. He
supported the East Downtown Master said the existing zoning on
Plan. She said the mix use zone Trolley Square would allowed a
would make it more enjoyable for height limitation of 198 feet. He
people who lived in the City and said the proposal was a signifi-
would make more people want to cant lowering of the height poten-
live in the downtown area. She tial and the proposed height
said she wanted to see the Zoning limitation of 75 feet was an
Committee look at the mix use plan appropriate height. He said
first. She said the idea of anything built in Trolley Square
creating a pedestrian linkage in would be in architectural design
the City was a wonderful idea. with Trolley Square. He said the
4th and 5th south area had been
Stan Penfold, 715 East 2nd developed for a retail center and
Avenue, said he was in favor of this would meet the commercial and
the plan and felt it would in- retail needs of the neighborhood.
crease the residential population He said the component of the block
along with the multi use residen- would be for residential develop-
tial/commercial area. He said he ment.
felt this would help the City
expand in after five o'clock use. Mary Allen, Outreach worker
for Salt Lake City and Housing,
Ken Wholeman, owner and devel- supported the mix use zone area
oper of Broadway Towers, said he and felt it would be helpful.
wanted the City to look at some
situations. He said he felt the Councilmember Hale said he
rent was not high enough to sup- felt residents with commercial
port the development which existed property might not be able to do
in the area. He said the City what they wanted with their prop-
might want to address a tax incen- erty. He was concerned it would
tive which would enhance the inhibit commercial development.
ability of a developer to go
forward with the development of Councilmember Whitehead said
the City. He said he felt the City he felt there needed to be a
90-311
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 1990
supermarket in the area and he ability study which outlined the
felt major development was needed chance of successful shared
in order to have one. parking, arrangements for leases
parking, and statements of
Councilmember Hardman thanked compatibility with the existing
the Planning Division, the staff Master Plan.
and the developers who were in-
volved in the creation of the East Mr. Wright said the Planning
Downtown Master Plan. He said Commission would receive a recom-
people could now look for some mendation from the Transportation
guidance in the Master Plan when Department and the Planning Staff.
planning their businesses. He said the Planning Commission
(T 90-25) would hold an informal hearing so
owners of the facility would be
#2 RE: A public hearing at able to express their concerns.
6:30 to receive public comment and He said the ordinance would allow
consider adopting an ordinance any facility to have one parking
amending Section 21.84.030(H) space for every four seats. He
concerning parking for theaters said a clause in the ordinance
and arenas pursuant to Petition made it effective immediately upon
No. 400-833-90. posting. The ordinance wil be
posted September 19, 1990, in the
ACTION: Councilmember Godfrey Recorders office.
moved and Councilmember Whitehead
seconded to close the public Councilmember Pace asked if an
hearing, which motion carried, all appeal of the ordinance would go
members voted aye. to the Planning Commission and
then to the City Council.
Councilmember Godfrey moved
and Councilmember Kirk seconded to Mr. Wright said the appeal
adopt Ordinance 80 of 1990, which would be sent to the Planning
motion carried, all members voted Commission for determination of
aye. the parking reduction and then the
decision could be appealed
DISCUSSION: Bill Wright, directly to the City Council.
Planning and Zoning, said the (P 90-315)
ordinance required one parking
space for every fourth seat. He The meeting adjourned at 7: 10
said a 20, 500 seat arena would p.m.
require 5, 125 parking spaces to be
developed and facilitated to use
in the Downtown Master Plan. He
said policies encouraged efficient COUNCIL CHAIR
use of land and capital resources
and supported shared parking when
it could be applied. He said the
ordinance amendment required an CITY RECORDER
application with a $100 filing
fee, a sight plan, and a statement
from the petitioner stating if the
facility needed fewer parking
spaces or shared parking. He said
the statement needed to include a
professionally prepared fees
90-312
'r
LINDA
HAMILTONOF IE SAW ! P� Y1�C� T�y�e�,�1�.�9J ?�IIfU � PALMERMAYOR
PAULIS
ll cs • AR DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 228
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE (801) 535-6426
September 6 , 1990
TO: Salt Lake City Council
RE: BUDGET AMENDMENT #1 - PUBLIC HEARING
Recommendation: That on October 2, 1990 the City Council set a
date to hold a public hearing on October 16 , 1990 to discuss
Budget Amendment #1 .
Availability of Funds : Not applicable .
Discussion and Background: The amendment packets will be
transmitted to the Council office on October 9 , 1990 .
Additionally, a briefing session will be held with the Council on
October 11 , 1990 to discuss the amendment .
Legislative Action: The City Attorney's office has prepared the
necessary ordinance and it is included with this transmittal .
Submitted by:
Linda Hamilton
Director of Finance
LH/SF:hd
cc: Lee King, Deputy Director of CED
Enclosure
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. OF 1990
(Amending the Budget of Salt Lake City, Utah)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE NO. 69
OF 1990 WHICH APPROVED, RATIFIED AND FINALIZED THE BUDGET OF
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1,
1990 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1991 .
PREAMBLE
On August 9 , 1990, the Salt Lake City Council approved,
ratified and finalized the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah,
which was adopted on June 12, 1990, for the fiscal year
beginning July 1 , 1990 and ending June 30, 1991, in
accordance with the requirements of Section 118, Chapter 6,
Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated, and said budget was
approved by the Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah.
The Director of Finance, acting as the City' s Budget
Officer, prepared and filed with the City Recorder proposed
amendments to said duly adopted budget, copies of which are
attached hereto, for consideration by the City Council and
inspection by the public.
The City Council fixed a time and place for a public
hearing to be held on October 16 , 1990 to consider the
attached proposed amendments to the budget and ordered
notice thereof be published as required by law.
Notice of said public hearing to consider the
amendments to said budget was duly published and a public
hearing to consider the attached amendments to said budget
was held on October 16, 1990 in accordance with said notice
at which hearing all interested parties for and against the
budget amendment proposals were heard and all comments were
duly considered by the City Council .
All conditions precedent to amend said budget have been
accomplished.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
SECTION 1 . Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is
to amend the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah as approved,
ratified and finalized by Salt Lake City Ordinance No . 69 of
1990 .
SECTION 2 . Adoption of Amendments . The budget
amendments attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance
be, and the same hereby are adopted and incorporated into
the budget of Salt Lake City, Utah for the fiscal year
beginning July 1, 1990 and ending June 30, 1991, in
accordance with requirements of Section 128, Chapter 6,
Title 10, of the Utah Code Annotated.
SECTION 3 . Certification to Utah State Auditor. The
Director of the City' s Finance Department, acting as the
City' s Budget Officer, is authorized and directed to certify
and file a copy of said budget amendments with the Utah
State Auditor.
-2-
SECTION 4 . Filing of Copies of the Budget Amendments .
The said Budget Officer is authorized and directed to
certify and file a copy of said budget amendments in the
office of said Budget Officer and in the office of the City
Recorder, which amendments shall be available for public
inspection.
SECTION 5 . Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take
effect on its first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,
this day of , 1990 .
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Approved by the Mayor this day of
, 1990 .
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
FMN:c c APPROVED AS TO FORM
Salt Lake City Attomey's Office
Date '. ° -
By
-3-
(SEAL)
Bill No. of 1990
Published
-4-
RESOLUTION NO. OF 1990
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND
THE UTAH STATE RETIREMENT BOARD
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES GROUP HEALTH PLAN
WHEREAS, Title 11 Chapter 13, U.C.A. , 1953 as amended allows
public entities to enter into cooperative agreements to provide
joint undertakings and services; and
WHEREAS, the attached agreement has been prepared to
accomplish said purposes;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Salt Lake
City, Utah:
1 . That it does hereby approve the attached agreement
generally described as follows:
An Agreement between Salt Lake City Corporation and
the Utah State Retirement Board to make available a
group insurance program to City employees .
2 . Palmer A. DePaulis, Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah is
hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of Salt
Lake City Corporation and to act in accordance with its terms .
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City this day
of , 1990 .
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
AS TO F2-�i
Satt Lake C:ty Attorney
Date 9-
CITY RECORDER Sy
FMN:cc
KAREN SUZUKI-HASHIMOTO � '�IttF�j-�� `/��j�. j
PALMER DEPAULIS
DIRECTOR
MAYOR
FRANK FRASER DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND
PATRICIA CAMPBELL. C.C.P. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
COMPENSATION 8 BENEFITS MANAGER
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 404
BRENDA R. HANCOCK SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TRAINING.EMPLOYMENT 8 COMPLIANCE
MANAGER TELEPHONE (801) 535-7900
September 10, 1990
To: Mayor Palmer DePaulis
Re: PEHP HEALTH CONTRACTS FY 90-91
Dear Mayor :
Attached are three contracts for fiscal year 1990-91 from Public
Employees Health Plan. This contract will cover all full-time
salaried employees and retirees.
The funds to cover the insurance premium costs are collected from
both Salt Lake City Corporation and its employees . They have
been budgeted in funds 87-00870-2549 and 87-00870-2549-17 .
I would appreciate your approval on these contracts .
Sincerely,
e`
er( . : ,
odi Langford / '
Employee Benefits Supervisor
JL/cg
Attachments ( 3 )
cc : File
AGREEMENT
BETWEEN SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION AND
THE UTAH STATE RETIREMENT BOARD
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES GROUP HEALTH PLAN
1 . JULY 1990 - 30. JUNE 1991
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between SALT LAKE CITY.
a body corporate and politic of the State of Utah. hereinafter referred to
as the "CITY" and the UTAH STATE RETIREMENT OFFICE, by and through its group
insurance division. hereinafter referred to as the "PUBLIC EMPLOYEES HEALTH
PROGRAM" or "PEHP" .
WITNESSET H:
WHEREAS. PEHP is obligated, pursuant to Title 49, Chapter 8. Utah Code
Annotated 1953. as amended. to establish a group insurance program and to
make that programs available to all employers of the state. its educational
institutions. and political subdivisions:
WHEREAS. such a group insurance program has been created and made
available:
WHEREAS. SALT LAKE CITY. as a political subdivision of the State of
Utah. is eligible to participate in such program:
WHEREAS. SALT LAKE CITY is desirous of participating in the group
insurance program made available by PEHP: and
WHEREAS. PEHP is desirous of making the benefits of the Traditional and
Preferred health plans . pharmacy plan. LTD program. and Healthy Utah program
available to the CITY.
NOW. THEREFORE. for and in consideration of the Agreements and
provisions hereinafter contained. it is hereby agreed as follows:
SECTION 1. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT
1 . 1. PEHP will make available to the CITY'S eligible employees and
retirees. and their dependents. all insurance programs provided by PEHP. It
is acknowledged by CITY that PEHP currently provides the following programs
administered by PEHP: PEHP Traditional Care. PEHP Preferred Care. Healthy
Utah. Long Term Disability. and Pharmacy programs.
1.2.The following documents. attached hereto and marked as Exhibits.
are hereby made a part of this Agreement as fully as though detailed herein:
1.2. 1. Exhibit 1 - Combined PEHP Traditional and Preferred Care
Booklet (1989-90) 1990-91 available this fall :
1.2.2. Exhibit 2 - 1990-91 Premium Schedule:
1.2.3. Exhibit 3 - Healthy Utah Brochure :
1 . 2.4. Exhibit 4 - PASS Brochure:
1.2.5. Exhibit 5 - 1990 Changes and Reminder Card:
1.2.6. Exhibit 6 - Medicare Supplement Brochure:
1 .2.7. Exhibit 7 - Insurance Coverage Period Schedule.
1.3. PEHP will make available the health and prescription drug benefits
for eligible employees . retirees under age 65 and their family dependents as
described in the above listed materials. All the terms. definitions. and
conditions of the health and prescription drug plans are hereby
incorporated. PEHP does not allow coverage for grandchildren under the
terms of its policy.
SECTION 2. INTERPRETATION
2. 1. The Agreement documents are complementary and what is called for
by any one of them shall be as binding if called for by all . In the event
of any inconsistency between any of the provisions of the Agreement
documents. the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence first to
2
this Agreement and then to the other documents. In addition. in the event
of any inconsistency or misinterpretation of this Agreement. the resolution
shall be subject to. and determined according to. PEHP interpretation.
SECTION 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT
3. 1 . Unless sooner terminated as herein provided, this Agreement shall
be effective for and pertain to claims incurred during the period 1. July
1990 through 30 June. 1991 . and shall be renewed on a yearly basis (unless
CITY notifies PEHP. in writing. by certified mail. of its intent to
terminate the contract ninety (90) days prior to the end of the state fiscal
year) .
SECTION 4. SELF FUNDED PROGRAMS
4. 1 . It is understood and agreed that Exhibit No. 2 outlines the
premiums to be charged the CITY for the programs from 1 . July 1990 through
30. June 1991. It is further understood and agreed that PEHP will provide
notice to the CITY of premium increases no later than 31 March of each year.
with the premium increases to be effective on 1 July.
4. 2. Notice of premium increases relating to medicare supplement
programs offered by PEHP will be provided no later than 30 November. unless
Medicare benefits change data has not yet been made available to PEHP by the
Medicare authorities , all changes will become effective on 1 January.
SECTION 5. PREMIUM PAYMENTS
5. 1. The CITY agrees to collect premiums from its employees and remit
the same to PEHP together with a copy of a remittance report. Such premiums
and report will be submitted to the plan bi-weekly following the appropriate
payroll dates. Late premium payments will be subject to finance charges and
interest fees of (11 percent of total premium after thirty (30) days.
0
5.2. It is understood and agreed that the CITY'S sole obligation
hereunder is to collect and remit the premiums. Such premiums may come in
whole or in part from the employee. retiree. or from the CITY. Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall obligate CITY to contribute any specific
percentage of the premium nor to provide any specified credits for sick
leave conversion. etc. to any employee.
SECTION 6. PLAN SERVICES AND REPORTING
6. 1 . PEHP shall establish and maintain its' usual hospital and
physician relation activities . subscriber service activities. investigative
and claim review procedures and legal review and defense services and shall
take all reasonable measures to prevent the allowance and payment of
improper claims. PEHP shall be responsible for collecting any improperly
paid claims and shall have no right of action against the CITY for any
monies lost as a result of such improperly paid claims.
6.2 . PEHP shall provide CITY with all administrative services provided
by PEHP to its other policy holders.
6.3. Reporting to the CITY of the total amount paid to providers for
claims shall be made on a quarterly basis. PEHP will also provide such
further data and actuarial reports on a quarterly basis for the purpose of
reviewing and evaluating the CITY'S experience under the programs made
available by PEHP. To the extent that any specific requested reports may be
unique and costly to produce. the CITY agrees to pay PEHP the reasonable
cost of assembling and preparing such additional data and reports . so long
as the cost of such report has been made available to the CITY in advance
and the CITY has agreed to pay such costs in writing.
6.4. The CITY agrees to reimburse PEHP for any costs incurred for
distribution of updated benefits information and materials to employees of
Salt Lake City Corporation.
6.5. Additional duties of PEHP shall be as follows:
6 .5. 1 . Payment of claims with all complete data necessary to process
them accurately according to State Insurance guidelines
within thirty (30) days upon receipt of all information
necessary to make payment. including essential coordination
of benefits data from the primary insurance carrier:
6 .5.2. Prepare and deliver claim forms. or cause them to be prepared
and delivered. to the CITY for issuance to eligible
employees . retirees. and their eligible dependents:
6.5.3. Notify claimants of a rejected claim and the reason for the
rejection within one (1 ) week of said actions:
6 .5,4. Notify claimants of claims paid within one (1 ) week of
following payment:
6.5.5. Advise and aid claimants in meeting requirements for
additional information and proper completion of claim forms:
6.5.6. Provide customer service staff and telephone numbers to
provide accurate information and response to inquiries of
CITY employees. retirees . and/or eligible dependents
regarding program coverage and benefits as well as specific
data concerning claims such as: status of claim. date paid.
amount. provider. etc.
5
6.5. 7. Perform internal audits on a quarterly basis on claim
payments. i.e. . utilization review. to insure that services
were performed that were medically necessary:
6.5.8. Discuss claims. where applicable. with physicians and other
providers of services:
6.5.9. Obtain and furnish information. as necessary. regarding
nonduplication or coordination of benefits:
6.5. 10. Prepare annual claim summaries in such formats as may be
agreed upon by the CITY and PEHP:
6.5. 11. Review claims experience. underwriting advice, and actuarial
guidance with the CITY at the time of any requested premium
increase:
6.5. 12. Investigate claims as necessary.
6.5. 13. It is the responsibility of the CITY to obtain and maintain
updated accurate records specifying enrollment data. member
files. eligibility information. effective dates. and employee
status information. The CITY agrees to the extent requested
by PEHP to provide PEHP with current and updated copies of
all completed enrollment forms and other documentation as
deemed necessary by PEHP.
6.5. 14 . The CITY hereby agrees that it is the sole responsibility of
PEHP to contract with providers and facilities. negotiate
program and provider policies. establish procedures. and
determine plan provisions. in reference to physicians.
hospitals. facilities. corporations or other entities.
6
SECTION 7. APPLICATION CARDS. IDENTIFICATION CARDS. AND BENEFIT BROCHURES
7. 1. PEHP shall furnish to the CITY appropriate enrollment forms for
distribution to new eligible employees and will distribute identification
cards and benefit brochures to such employees upon receipt and processing of
such enrollment forms. There will be a fee charged to members requesting
additional identification cards after two cards are issued. Appropriate
documents will also be provided for retirees.
7.2. CITY agrees to verify employment status and date of employment
information contained in any new applications filed by employees and to
inform PEHP of any change in employee or dependent status or of the
termination of coverage of any employee or family members. on a bi-weekly
basis.
SECTION 8. TERMINATION
8. 1. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90 ) days
written notice, by certified mail . for failure of the other party to comply
with the terms of this Agreement.
8.2. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement. PEHP shall
continue to process and pay claims for services incurred by CITY employees .
retirees. and appropriate family members prior to the date of termination or
expiration of this Agreement.
8.3. A11 members of Public Employees Health Program shall participate
in a self-funded Reinsurance Plan. This Reinsurance Plan shall cover large
medical claims that exceed limits established by the Board based on
actuarial recommendations in the amount of S10.000.
J. 4. The Board has established that groups larger than 1 .000 employees
shall he rated on their own claim costs with the Reinsurance Plan experience
provided for.
8.5. Any political subdivision making an early withdrawal from the PEEP
Trust Fund shall be responsible for its own incurred but unreported claims
liability to the extent of a deficit. once premiums and administrative costs
(of a minimum of 4 percent of premium) are accounted for. Early withdrawal
is defined as terminating coverage from the Public Employees Health Program
Trust Fund prior to 30. June 1991.
3. 6. The Group Insurance Fund may continue to be made available to
political subdivisions. but no solicitation shall be made by administrators
of the Trust Fund or agents of the Retirement Board.
8. 7. It is hereby agreed that the CITY has the right to terminate this
Agreement if funds are not appropriated for the fiscal policy year. It is
further agreed that if termination occurs as a result of non-funding of
program benefits. the CITY is liable for claims incurred but not reported
and other costs as outlined in Section 8 of this contract.
SECTION 9. CONTINGENT LIABILITY FOR EARLY WITHDRAWAL
9. 1 . Any political subdivision making any early withdrawal from the
PEEP Trust Fund shall be responsible for its own incurred but unreported
claims liability to the extent of a deficit. once premiums and
administrative costs are accounted for. When a surplus exists. the
political subdivision shall be refunded the balance.
9.2. Early withdrawal is defined as terminating coverage from the
Public Employees Health Program Trust Fund prior to 30. June 1991 .
O
9.3. It is understood and agreed that Salt Lake City will be liable if
it elects to remain in the program beyond 1 . July 1989. and thereafter
withdraws prior to 1 July. 1991 . its maximum liability shall not exceed the
lesser of the amount calculated under Section 9. (Contingent Liability for
Early Withdrawal ) or 10 percent of the most recent 12 months premium.
SECTION 10. AVAILABILITY OF DATA
10. 1 . The CITY shall be entitled. upon written request. to possession
of data. or a copy of the same, provided the CITY reimburses PEHP for the
actual cost of reproducing said data. Said data must be delivered to the
CITY in a format that is usable by and meaningful to the CITY without the
use of PEHP'S proprietary data. The data made available includes all data
collected, maintained, used, or stored by PEHP with the exception of
proprietary data owned by PEHP.
SECTION 11 . RECORD RETENTION AND REVIEW
11 . 1 . PEHP shall maintain. or cause to be maintained. records covering
claims submitted to PEHP hereunder as well as payments disbursed by it. The
records shall be maintained for the same period of time that PEHP retains
like records in connection with its claims administration provided to other
entities. Agents and representatives of the CITY shall at all reasonable
times have the right to inspect and audit the books and records of PEHP.
insofar as they relate to premium payments made hereunder. PEHP may, at its
option. provide appropriate data to the CITY for audit and review in lieu of
the CITY inspecting actual plan records where disclosure of the original
records would jeopardize other confidential or proprietary information of
PEHP.
9
SECTION 12. ENROLLMENT
12. 1. It is understood and agreed that all employees with previous
coverage enrolling in any of the programs offered by PEHP who have already
met the nine month pre-existing condition time period shall , during open
enrollment periods . receive a waiver of all pre-existing conditions and
waiting periods.
12.2. Any new employees enrolling in PEHP shall be subject to the pre-
existing condition regulations applicable to the program selected by them.
Any new dependents added to employee coverage who have not had prior
coverage will be subject to the nine-month pre-existing condition provisions
as outlined in Exhibit 1 . upon completion and approval of the PEHP health
statement.
SECTION 13. RETIREE BENEFITS
13.1 . PEHP will continue to make available to the CITY' S existing
eligible retirees. and their eligible dependents, the same programs as are
made available to state retirees . Thereafter. those retirees will be
entitled to retiree coverage at 120 percent of the group premium until age
65 or at premiums as may be specified by PEHP.
13.2. Effective 1 . July 1990. all Salt Lake City Retirees . retiring
after 1 . July 1990 will be entitled to enroll in the PEHP Retiree health
plans currently being offered at a premium amount of 120% of the group rate.
Rules and regulations adopted by PEHP shall be applied equally to all
retirees . PEHP shall make available to all retirees copies of any rules ,
regulations . and restrictions limiting their coverage or their options to
insurance.
13.3. Retirees and eligible dependents. as specified in Exhibit 1 . upon
i0
reaching age 65. and no longer working will be eligible to convert to the
Public Employees Medicare Supplement Plan.
13.4. Retirees and dependents who become ineligible under the retiree
group plan pursuant to the COBRA Act may continue their coverage at 122% of
the group rate.
SECTION 14. COBRA COVERAGE FOR HEALTH INSURANCE
14. 1. Salt Lake City employees and eligible dependents who become
ineligible for coverage under the group health plan made available by PEHP
will be permitted to continue coverage for such periods of time and at such
premiums as set forth by PEHP in compliance with the requirements of
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) as it may be
amended from time to time. CITY. upon learning CITY employees or eligible
dependents have become eligible for COBRA. will so notify those employees
and dependents of their options under COBRA.
14.2 . After 18 or 36 months. employees may take a conversion policy for
Traditional Health Plan at 135 percent of the group premium.
14.3. Employees and dependents who become ineligible for coverage under
the group health plan may continue their coverage by contacting Public
Employees Health Program within 60 days of termination of coverage.
14 .4. Employees and their eligible dependents may continue coverage at
a cost of 102 percent of the group rate for up to 18 months when termination
is due to a reduction in hours worked. or upon termination of employment.
14.5. Dependents are eligible to continue their insurance for up to 36
months at the specified premium rates. upon the occurrence of the following
events:
11
14.5.1 . The spouse and children upon death of the covered employee.
14.5.2. The spouse and children upon divorce or legal separation from
the employee.
14 .5.3. The spouse and children of Medicare eligible employees. when
the employee ceases to participate in the employer sponsored
plan.
14.5.4. Dependent children when they cease to be a dependent child
under the definition of the policy.
SECTION 15. LONG-TERM DISABILITY
15. 1 . Salt Lake City employees who are on long term disability and who
are members of either the Traditional Care or the Preferred Care Programs
offered by PEHP will have their health insurance premiums waived beginning
two months (2 ) after the employee's last day worked for up to a twenty-two
(22) month period.
SECTION 16. ELIGIBILITY
16. 1 . PEHP will provide insurance coverage to those employees and their
eligible dependents that are identified by the CITY as being eligible for
coverage and as having paid a premium. The effective date of coverage will
generally be the first day of the time period for which a premium has been
paid. unless a different date is identified by the CITY and back premiums
paid therefor.
16.2. Newborns must be added within 31 days of event: to be effective
on the date of birth.
16.3. Newly married spouses must be added within 31 days of event: to
be effective on the first date of the coverage period for which a premium is
deducted.
16.4 . Over-age dependents will have coverage through the entire two
week insurance period in which the event takes place: termination will be on
the first date of the following insurance period.
12
16.5. Divorced spouse will have coverage through the entire two week
insurance period in which the event takes place: termination will be on the
first date of the following insurance period.
16.6. Cancellations will have coverage through the entire two week
insurance period in which notification is given: termination will be on the
first date of the following insurance period.
16.7. Health statements will be required for employees not meeting the
31 day deadline to add dependents: to be effective on the first date of the
coverage period for which a premium is deducted.
16.8. PEHP has established and will make available to the CITY
eligibility rules as they apply to dependents of employees. City will be
obligated to comply with those eligibility rules so established by PEHP.
SECTION 17 . MEMBERSHIP ON POLICY BOARD--COUNCIL
17. 1. It is understood and agreed that Salt Lake City will be entitled
to at least one seat on any membership council or policy advisory board
established by PEHP to make policy recommendations and provide advice to
PEHP. the State Retirement Office. or its director.
SECTION 18. GENERAL
18.1 . This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written
instrument executed by duly authorized officers of the parties hereto.
18.2. This contract may not be assigned by PEHP without the written
consent of the CITY.
18.3. PER? shall indemnify the CITY. its officers and employees against
liability for injury or damage caused by any negligent act or omission of
any of PEHP'S officers or employees. volunteers or agents in the performance
13
of the Agreement.
18.4. If either party defaults in the performance of this Agreement or
any of its covenants. terms. conditions. or provisions. the defaulting party
shall pay all costs and expenses. including a reasonable attorney' s fee.
which may arise or accrue from enforcing the Agreement or from pursuing any
remedy provided thereunder.
18.5. This Agreement is entered into in the State of Utah and shall be
governed by the laws of said state.
18.6 Any notice required herein of PEHP shall be addressed to the Salt
Lake City Corporation. 451 South State #404. Salt Lake City. Utah 84111.
and when required of the CITY, shall be addressed to the Public Employees
Health Program. 560 East 200 South Main Lobby. Salt Lake City, Utah 84102.
14
EXECUTED this .22_ day of August. 1990
STATE RETIREMENT OFFICE
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES HEALTH PROGRAM
4011: 11`
410/441.......w
By
Linn J. Baker. Director
Date ,I OI
Approv• - /Ir w /
.cot .n.en
Assistant Director
Approved O (J
Pa Astorga
Enr lment Sup visor
STATE OF UTAH 1
ss.
City of Salt Lake 1
On this iff day of August. 1990. personally appeared before me Linn
J. Baker. who being by me duly sworn. did say that he is the Administrator
of the Public Employees Health Program of the State Retirement Office and
that the foregoing Agreement was signed in behalf of the Utah State
Retirement Office and its Public Employees Health Program. and said that he
is duly authorized to bind said entity.
, difiel/116‘'014ZA.
My Commission Expires :
aiii_9=2/___ NOT SaltRLakeBCity.rUtahing in
15
EXECUTED this day of August. 1990
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
By
Palmer DePaulis
Mayor
Attest
Kathryn Marshall
City Recorder
STATE OF UTAH
ss.
City of Salt Lake
On this day of August. 1990. personally appeared before me Palmer
DePaulis and Kathryn Marshall. who being by me duly sworn. did say that they
are the Mayor and City Recorder of the Salt Lake City Corporation and that
the foregoing Agreement was signed in behalf of the Salt Lake City
Corporation. and said that they are duly authorized to bind said entity.
My Commission Expires:
NOTARY PUBLIC. residing in
Salt Lake City. Utah
FINANCE APPROVAL
. .i.Not Needed /7/
' s Axailabie
:• # 87- 9//57/
r ,�x,�RNF APPROVAL
VED TO FORM
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 - Combined PEHP Traditional and Preferred Care
Booklet (1989-90) 1990-91 available this fall:
Exhibit 2 - 1990-91 Premium Schedule:
Exhibit 3 - Healthy Utah Brochure:
Exhibit 4 - PASS Brochure:
Exhibit 5 - 1990 Changes and Reminder Card:
Exhibit 6 - Medicare Supplement Brochure:
Exhibit 7 - Insurance Coverage Period Schedule.
17
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 2
ACTIVE MEMBERS
MONTHLY MONTHLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE
Single S127. 74 S121 .53
Two Party 263.45 250.48
Family 351 .39 334 .38
BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE
Single S 58.96 S 56.09
Two Party 121 .59 115.61
Family 162. 18 154.33
ACTIVE MEMBER ON COBRA
(102% OF Group Premium)
MONTHLY MONTHLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE
Single S130.29 S123.96
Two Party 268.72 255.09
Family 358.42 341 .07
BI-WEEKLY BI-WEEKLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE
Single S 60. 13 $ 57.21
Two Party 124.02 117 .73
Family 165.42 157.42
RETIRED MEMBERS ON COBRA
MONTHLY MONTHLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH CARE
Single S155.84 S148 .26
Two Party 321 .40 305.58
Family 428.69 407 .94
CONVERSION
(135% of Group Premium)
MONTHLY MONTHLY
TRADITIONAL PREFERRED
HEALTH CARE HEALTH
CARE
Single S172.45 S 79.59
Two Party 355.66 164 .15
Family 474.38 218.94
MEDICARE SUPPLEMENT
High Option $ 97.00
Low Option 47.50
I •11
El
LEROY W. HOOTON, JR.
DIRECTOR �. (�y� y.�
WENDELL E.
SUPERINTENDENSEN, P.E.T »A2_A)Q`I��Ir ��l�,IvU �� = 11051
WATER SUPPLY&WATERWORKS �d lJ 11 11V11/// V/ ill 1
E. TIM DOXEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
SUPERINTENDENT Water Supply & Waterworks - PALMER DEPAULIS
WATER RECLAMATION Water Reclamation MAYOR
JAMES M. LEWIS, C.P.A.
CHIEF FINANCE& 1530 SOUTH WEST TEMPLE
ACCOUNTING OFFICER
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84115
GEORGE JORGENSEN, P.E.
CHIEF ENGINEER
September 10, 1990
TO: Salt Lake City Council
RE: New City Ordinance Changes
Recommendation: That the Council approve the new ordinance and
forward to the Mayor for execution in behalf of the City.
Availability of Funds: None required.
Discussion; Find attached ordinances amending Chapters 16, 44
and 72 of Title 17 of the Salt Lake City Code relating to changes
in culinary water system, wastewater control and sewer system.
S bmitted by:
(A)� 44di ,
LEROY W HOOTON, 11111
Director
Department of Public Utilities
vb
attachments
file
�s
.-. - zr n,., a'+`la� .;TN: +ti�+e3 i• 'Y7r S1 1 :<��k1 C :sxo"1 .y `'i� -1M1� p- 54�Y"'R�"`i�f_.,.. 'r
.--( \ Y 11 1 4> If t f • +1` A - ♦� l} - ^ c d ' t £
1 i t i,..:.e t t '.`'t1 + _. +`v'n+3A} .r`E-. .�"!1� Ij t•i� i Ytib;'}`��t�r I' w r _;.
t'
u rrati L?.: :iaS x r 9 l
- :• �,�� �� •1 1 - �Y !} l A,� 3a. _lai �L7L ��� i •v
SALT LAKE-CITY-ORDINANCE -
No. - of •.1990
(Changes in culinary -water
wastewater control and sewer system ) t+hF ; •
x rv( r ti#'t A
.
e" w
f , '•��"l i .r ,!,7;G r} ) �'epy¢Y ? ,'r ,+" Tr. 4l l�t.f: A k. ,� ,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS -16, 44 SAND .72 OF�,eeT� ITLE�
17 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, _
• , . ... 1: 1 ,}- � r` {frc ." i'i;--t3.' i f
SYSTEM,- WASTEWATER CONTROL AND SEWER'.SYSTEM.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, ::: --
Utah
SECTION 1 . That Section 17 . 16 .040 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to fees, be, and the same hereby is
amended as follows :
17.16.040 Fees for connection and other facilities
A. A fee will be imposed for all meter installations,
automatic •fire-line -connections, .detector 'check' [valves]
meters, fire system and other installations, inspection, :_
water storage and other water facilities from time to time - . -
-" in amounts as determined by the director of public
utilities .
B. In all cases, the pipe and type of materials to be
furnished and installed in the public right of way or per .;
written agreement are to• be maintained by the city shall'be
approved_by the public;,utilities director ::and 'shall ;,be ,under
the director s exclusive'.control �;<All;-excavation and::;:other :, ;
Y
• , permits necessary shall be obtained'zat the•texpense,'of, the t,ef� �-- fyr .
applicant. Pipe and%material outside +the ,'public way and vx 4
,ram t
r •
r°*y. , L r' ti•
• • , • 3x
v• Fh h 1 i g *`� ',,_�y�j}lr'+`v :5 J f+(rl?t�..a Z tN t ✓h f . r -1�• 'F r! - y r f.l '�•Z,F r F ;:
c t rr - t y'•t t l r ll i Z f -r' r !f 7../ r r "t'(Tt x j it. f _> 3 ,s rt � . rr tti; !a t ri r t �� v
.. T :y ( _ t t 1 4�i 11r X ! f � A..i '( 11 i t It�� ri '„
r ' -,. ` .l ( �,._: E lr .;s .+`i s L q 1` ic•az t�. , , { -r;r ?�6• ?A'..' s
pipe and materials installed as private pipelines or
services shall be maintained by the property owners.
SECTION 2 . That Section 17 . 16 .335 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to refund of expenses, be, and the same
hereby is, amended as follows:
17.16.335 Refund of expenses. 4
The certified cost of the petitioner' s installation of
such new extension or money deposited pursuant to Sections
17 . 16 . 310, 17 . 18 . 320 and 17 . 16 .330, or successor sections,
of this article may be partially or completely refunded,
without interest thereon, only under the following
conditions:
A. For a period of [five] fifteen years from the date
on which such an extension is completed and approved in
writing by the city, the city will add a charge to be
refunded to the petitioner, as set forth below, for each
connection made to such extension pursuant to a written ..
request for a service lateral connection thereto from a
property owner.
B. Such charge shall be a front footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the
said cost of installation of said extension prorated over
the total front footage of the petitioner's property
fronting on such extension. [Ine7-e - --t •-ba_ _ of
t V
more than two lot3 is _ to be eefin=-tcd to tke cxtcnsion,
charge shall be booed upon a front feet .charge for each
in the subdivision. ] " ,
_2_ ,i`t -i t .> `' 't
✓ i.� f.. YE 'r = L - I.'
Co
* * * —'
SECTION 3 . ; That'Section 17 -. 16.337 of the Salt Lake ;.
City Code, relating to return of city's expenses, be, and"`` ' ` '
the same hereby is, amended as follows:
':z 17.16.337 .. Return of city's expenses. ',, s
A During a period of [five] fifteen iyears from the
date on which an extension is completed where the • city has
advanced all or part of the funds for such extension and has
decided to obtain a refund of expense therefor for
connections thereto, the city shall make a proportional
charge based upon the following formula for any connection-
; to such extension pursuant to a written request `for`a ,'..
service lateral connection thereto from a property owner.
B. Such charge shall be a front footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the.:
said cost of installation of the extension prorated' over'Tthe' '-
total front footage of the petitioner' s property fronting on
the extension. [ In the event a 3ubdivi3ion of more than two -
lots is to be conncete `._,`.,
be based upon a from feet charge fe-r ash lot in such
subdivision. ]
SECTION 4 . That Section 17 .16 .530 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to fire protection pipes be;` and the ; sy •
same hereby is, amended as follows . s {
t r � r� Stu`
17 16 530 Fire protection pipes Meter :required
3 }
3_ it y 1 Q i..s ,fa+. J r - cf
) r 1 1 •
zi 4 'k NY'" .yy '� .-.r }
e
r
== Should -water be used -through.:_[such] unmetered. fire
pipes or fire pipes with detector meters or fire pipes
havinq only,outside fire hydrants :attached for other .than
-fire purposes the public utilities director may require the
disconnection of theadequatesystem
payment �is
<made [therefor] for use of said water, and [ohall] said
director may require that [fa] an approved meter be installed
upon the fire system at the owner' s expense, and no water
shall be delivered to such fire system until such meter is
paid for and installed and the estimated unmetered water
used is paid for. The type of meter installation shall be
determined by the public utilities .,director. - - -
SECTION 5 . That Section 17 . 16 .670 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to minimum charges be, and the same
hereby is, amended as follows :
17.16.670 Minimum charges.
A. The minimum charge for the first one thousand cubic
feet of water used each month through each service
connection shall be based on meter size used, as set out in
Table 17 . 16 . 670 . The minimum charge for meters larger than
ten inches shall be: based proportionately on meter capacity,.
as determined by the public utilities director. After the
first one thousand cubic feet of water is delivered through
the meter each month, ,ch arges for additional water shall -be =
controlled by Section :17 16 680`of ;this 'chapter, or its
successor. -
4 y {' 4,
ti
t s 3 Yr tS'AA . rt Hi— 'i:t s(xY .11kI -L.1..{{'t•t'i `if t't�'Yt`t X ' ) r,..V.i i r F L x ,.i ' r i— -
r- a ;,. _ i , -' >`','VS'-'-i ' Y.a. rti ,. S 5-T-Y t t1,V , M.. .Y) i t. _ ys `) t :J
, r u ;I 57i. Ad nPi`1,1 J:r tA51 d 'Ii4,01 ,µ"Kr 444W Ci c Y. rY..t`r'1'y a 7 - f •i,
`._ ,. s*,r : •. r it f y1.h) ?1 �t� f'? - 3 .;i:I ;-T'As' Pft r ' -zy _ 1 ! --: y s
i.
f t 8 '41 k„4"r-t. s i- .tr r ;$.'7, } ! _- r :' -
ti ! .s .. i ..: G,iYt ':. 1-..,..., 1 iy,F Oat. 'ig s: rt "f .,T. ^' F t%,'.t,. C -is•; 4) rs '
B A11 nonmetered`-f ire--protection=systems :and_:fire :_ .: ,
r-i'.. f-is-T'a `f fi rt.i ;: t+.v:;r i ti't' ?!.f?;•''r"!'hr� 1,(i r` 'ii, ?'-f;l` ! y>F'iita t.:':;, •F .::';`_.- ,!:.
protection systems that' includes:a ^.detector..-check-meter shall -
n 1:
shave s:!monthly;minimum'I-_standby charge1Pwhich ris i less than�,;" K'f L' , ;
t ._ . , , , i,. a;, T S i:'-:e ,ra.Xt��,rxF,t (.14Vi ,O. '','4�,17 ,�'Pl°yFr`i.,-� 4a ^;, ' `� ,jti.Na s; .4?` i
that required -in subparagraph ,A`above,-='as-determined by. the
t - i
Public'ut liti.'es' direcor' `Onall fir`e P rotection PiPes :t : v' r - 4
F where'`a fire 'f low meter.4is ,required; ltheh-charges shall be u _
7 -4 a.:. i ,ri ,, djr ,..fi!{ -"7-`t?.. '..'�A.Rt:: .;r�r .•r, -;f.: r . - 1r
controlled- by subsection A`above. -
SECTION 6 .' ' -That 'Section 17 :44 . 200 of the Salt Lake
- City Code,: relating to extensions -. refund ,of expenses -
conditions be, and the same hereby is , amended as follows :
17.44.200.,.-Extensions -. refund of• expenses -. ,
conditions. ., . . ... 3
The certified "cost of the petitioner' s installation of -
• the extension ' or money deposited: pursuant to Sections
17 .44 . 170 or 17 .44 .190 -of this chapter, _or:.successor : -
-Sections; may be 'partially or completely- refunded; without
interest thereon, only under the following conditions :
. A. During •a period of [five]` fifteen-years from the -
date on' which- such -an`extension 'is completed and approved . in -: •
writing by the city, the city will add a charge to be
refunded to the petitioner,., as set forthbelow, for each ;
connection made to such extension pursuant--,;to, a written . %•
•
-' request for a' service lateral connection thereto from a '
property owner. 1 :�,r4` +t v �
•
'B Said •;charge shall ,be a {front footage charge ; 3 4,
=?r prorated-against' the property to be tserved,j.based •upon the .
i -rrr�. `V 4 Ai,1 54 'S+ t ` , t s1. ri t: f 'i r37 i - I y -'4 y ,, tA' -ri :-,,
+.f�,eS",�1, , e } r a 4 4 Y I , 1� s y C ;.,{,, ra.,i -trJ v a_
r N 5 ,_,Frt'� } y r.qy2 a t..ft S, $r f r1e 1 rY'4 •,
r r � , f:t c Y, r 1 ? �..-. �i.y t .P r�,+x� }� .}t. 5 N r -r ! �`
t y. ra`��•1 1t st, � rr--,: " t i°7 i. Yri y ty^r e ry 4;1 < J p � '' Y 7 lri " tr• ;t
a. ..at 'T a` '' 4y ?r'
M
cost of installation of such-extension :prorated'over.�the_"__ _-
total front footage of the petitioner' sproperty fronting,.on•
3 q
the extension.. [In the event a subdi_vaaibri of more than r;two ,fib ."x i
. .. _ - - � f•= i •rG�!'St'��`fyrL� r��:�'"t�� .�I'° A`(y 1:+ J;�' �°T-" .t i��i 5. tn-':
be baacd upon 'd f rent-foot chargc for Inch lot in`
r 7ac.� y F • ,I .F- t
�_ -" ..
oubdivicion. ] r � �^tyF �� � ,
C .
. * * * ,
SECTION 7 . That Section 17 .44 .210.of-';the .Salt Lake
City Code, relating to return of city' s „expenses be, and the
same hereby is, amended as follows:
17.44.210 Return of city's expenses
A. During a period of [f ivc] ""fifteen-years :from the:
date on which an extension is completed where :.the city has - .
advanced all or part of the funds for.;each . extension. and has
decided to obtain a refund of expense thereof from
connections thereto, the 'city shall-make` an additional
proportional charge based upon the -following formula for-any
connection to such extension pursuant to a written request
for service lateral connection thereto ,'from a property
owner.
B. Such charge shall .be a front ,footage-charge:
prorated against the property to be: served, based upon the ..
said cost of installation of the extension prorated over, the
total front footage of the petitioner' s property..property.: on
: g_
the extension. ' " [In the •event a subdivi3l.on of more than 'two ;
ti.
_., .._.- ... ,.., .... ..--- -.-(-. ..,::.• ki; i, .:1f.+'..,�gi-rty,�3�t�t�,.r}$Yn`r.e -
oubdivision. ]
SECTION 8 . That Section 17 .72.030 of the Salt
City Code,: relating to sewer fees be, and the same hereby ::, ,
is, amended as follows : 4
r
17.72.030 * *
SEWER FEES.
Effective [ilanuary 1 , 1905] September 15, 1990, the public
utilities director shall charge and the city treasurer shall
collect the following fees [which shall be raiscd] :
[ 1 . Uncovcrcd rou heat eenneetien survey $30 . 00]. :
[ ] 1 . Sewer and miscellaneous inspection [$35. 00]
$60 .00
{-3,] 2 . Sewer repair inspection $30 .00 -
[5—] 3 . Trial sewer survey $35 . 00
[fr-] 4 . Sewer survey $100 .00
[-7—] 5. Resurvey [ ] additional charge
each occasion , [$100 . 00] $35 . 00
[4—] 6 . The charge for installation of sewer special'wyes
[ $75. 00] shall be determined by the director of
public utilities, which cannot exceed the city' s,.: .
actual costs plus reasonable overhead.
[Effective January 1, 19-8-5, the *Public utilities director
following connection fees ] �} ,G `
7 . Wastewater discharge permit $20 . 00s ,
1 { 6 l- r Y �ti-G EIj W � 1r.
7 f
1 tt
} -
.. •.ram
8 .- - Grease and sand trap inspection - - '. - -$30.00---- -�
[8—] 9 . - Connection fees on new development property. 1
(a) Residential single dwelling, and_ condominium, and ;e
twin homes per connection or unit [$1,000.0&] •
$50000
(b) Multifamily dwellings
(i) Duplex [$1,500 .00] $750.00
(ii) Triplex [$2, 250. 00] $1,125.00
(iii ) Townhouse (apartment) , per unit
[$750 . 00] $375 . 00
(c) Hotels and motels
(i) Per dwelling unit without kitchen: or ,
restaurant [$500.00] $250 . 00
(ii) Per dwelling unit with a kitchen or . •
•
restaurant [$666 .00] $333 . 00
(iii ) Per dwelling unit with a kitchen and'a'' • -
restaurant, plus fixture units in
restaurant $333 . 00
(d) General commercial and industrial uses -per each •
equivalent fixture unit [ (one cquivalent unit .
cqual3 20 fixtures] /based on Utah Plumbing :Code) :.
[$1,000 . 00] $25. 00
(e) Trailer parks, per equivalent [fixture] unit[;] • .
(three trailer spaces shall equal onec[equivalent
fixture unit) ] residential single dwelling
$1 ,000 . 00] $500. 00 .
•
t v _
-. .. _ �8._ t�
, - - O t • x , R4t•'•��v 31T d 1.�� C .,Jr
,T,1 .' • i - ` i.._ ., t { t..i sT rnr9':` w:...:..'4 7- - - _
� 't�t r
a >\ n ! i }t t,
•
i jl�lgy;+r�,Fhf Ttil-:. r�
1 Iy v4q tin. ..!• 5e- Va • 4• ..I t- s .��5� r! ..'—'' • :.EL. + !+ 5'.
•
��v --,,y.i... •,c.. -. ..,Tt ., ..; _. .`: 1 ,t _,..:. .• , • tY i;... t .,, r a.:-. }v :..i
(f ) Recreation parks per-equivalent-unit.-.(six --trailer
N. 5 = rug- a J , .spaces shall equal one residential singlerdwelling
K ; unit) NY 4, - a $500. 00
:.i 1 1ti4_") �i M7f`r I t�- >'i. x. k 5
.• t . ;is x ': �.. ,.
[ (f) ] (g) " Special industrial and-commercial uses,
° `,4 r ' ▪ '`including carwashes, laundromats, etc:-, as
by the` City'5 ;public f
utilities director, shall be charged ($1,000.00]
• $25 . 00 per equivalent fixture unit, [based on
discharge capacity, ] as specified in the Uniform
Plumbing Code.
[PERMIT FEES
•
. . „ . 1_. . Waatewator elis-eherge pemit . $20. 00
2. Uncove-r rough elttre een•neetion iipcction $10 . 00 ,
3 . Sewcr and mi3eellanceus inspceti-en $30 . 00
4 . Sand trap inspeetien $5.00
Inatallatien of ewe apeeial wyc $50. 00
• —Sewer repair inepectie $30 . 00
7 Trial sewer aurcy $70. 00
ASSESSMENT FEES
Where een te-e-tian in el e main sewer lines in3tallcd at city
cxpcn3c withou-t ate- nt to the -property, an additional.•
s ; flt time of con-notion based upon property -owner's
- frontage $30.00/.
5 T t •
` front feet
r 11 5 y 9�s 3!,{ 1 41 }.�'Tr }t -,.k �<' v.r.•+l ,-j r <
4 5. Y Y•i +.1-M'I5f Y S. T'- tr' 4 ..
- • t /:^t,l u,: ,-lf 41r; `?. a,"ar'hkd+F r�s ;d�'A��t-:. .iS ? ,.,r _
•
r t ,+ l� i �t�t.i of y,{RM.Yf �d .
9'cl ...r'� �;ej +''-r4 taNfrtzq• M1r;;r r _ r t _
C`, t- ,., tjsx=ii tS � g4iy.;�fo-➢ .?tti..i.e.-t_, .+.: ..
Permit fce to covcr coat of e ncoring, surveying and
inspection $150. 00]
10. Connection fees on.,property ,with prior--development ,.,X R,
, � l.�C .+yi,:-G, C lal�.y�,5��+.•�1sf�-Q .��; g1�.8�g`1t t'r �`'^ ., %,_ ... I
• (a) When a residential :buirding is'demolished, there
}
is` no new- sewer 'connection°'fee'for`the property'
• when residential :'use:.or,.'building,-type is same as
`prior to demolition. ` After 5 years from date of
demolition no credit •will- be given for prior sewer
connection fees and the property owner will be
required to pay all applicable fees.
(b) When a commercial building •such as .a hotel, motel, :.;
industrial building,' ' etc. wis"demolished there is
no sewer connection fee- for the property when the -
new use is the same as prior to demolition,
otherwise, the sewer fee shall be based and
charged on the new or- additionaluse'pursuant to
the applicable provisions of 9c, d, e, f, and g
herein. After 5 years 'from date of demolition no
credit will be given for prior sewer connection
fees and the property owner will be required to
pay all applicable fees ,
11 . Temporary sewer connections may only be made by •
• approval of the public utilities director. Temporary
connections cannot exceed 24;months .'= The fee for each
s:
ai
'temporary connection ' shall be $100.00 All other
:applicable fees 'will be-effective for temporary
connections . e s
S f J
1t+Ply + al ar p�" It r + r r tt t �.15 ii ! r r'
•
+ .S; !aF -, 10 4 i.� 1 zY. fir j174 +
• 1,...• 1 'Y K}�{'tt. F t'- ¢-�.(f''•T.'t.t h Klt. .".";a S 1i
-c ti , cF �X1 `` fs�trJpf! .scar c ll� r.,
r y
; t i A,y,; �• �Y�?jyT
j f.-s0 aS "3r+$:4T, p u:Tz I hIl: I
-,5 r
r >� f.A"} h Sat n It tY• '`�eit 22C . ."
..( J) �.�A%�Y�• 1.-
SECTION 9 . This Ordinance :.shall-take=effect-on=-the -" �
• ••'' ; y} v ry ,
date of its first publication. F •
Passed by the City" Council of. Salt Lake City; Utah,` la �
,
this day of
-! i.T • e f
CHAIRPERSON °; • ,, ��� f
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on •
Mayor' s Action: Approved... Vetoed > ,. .t: •.
MAYOR •
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
RLM:cc
•
•
!1 -
�f.! _-,RJU r l.Fii ri ifs 1.d t'� t �`"f • -* ft '-� i, t t i
S a l�
! 41 to 1R(VIM;£ r *�•t4FF N.11 1�1 /i. '
'.l Jtiitif,s /� rNL '4Y2 11 M 7 Sy,.l r err I E� 'S f C }' fir I Y"y•
• I ,� %.lye, irS';-_41 �h��ryl ts•����il - 1r -t r4•p�, •/z Y.w --� r < c •
1 5
b.._ (_s,L .. �i;.ail.: w J �� - _.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 1990
(Changes in culinary water system,
wastewater control and sewer system. )
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 16, 44 AND 72 OF TITLE
17 OF THE SALT LAKE CITY CODE, RELATING TO CULINARY WATER
SYSTEM, WASTEWATER CONTROL AND SEWER SYSTEM.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
SECTION 1 . That Section 17 . 16 . 040 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to fees , be, and the same hereby is
amended as follows :
17 .16 .040 Fees for connection and other facilities.
A. A fee will be imposed for all meter installations ,
automatic fire-line connections , detector check meters , fire
system and other installations , inspection, water storage
and other water facilities from time to time in amounts as
determined by the director of public utilities .
B. In all cases , the pipe and type of materials to be
furnished and installed in the public right of way or per
written agreement are to be maintained by the city shall be
approved by the public utilities director and shall be under
the director' s exclusive control . All excavation and other
permits necessary shall be obtained at the expense of the
applicant. Pipe and material outside the public way and
pipe and materials installed as private pipelines or
services shall be maintained by the property owners .
SECTION 2 . That Section 17 . 16 . 335 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to refund of expenses, be, and the same
hereby is , amended as follows:
17. 16 .335 Refund of expenses.
The certified cost of the petitioner' s installation of
such new extension or money deposited pursuant to Sections
17 . 16 . 310, 17 . 18 . 320 and 17 . 16 .330, or successor sections ,
of this article may be partially or completely refunded,
without interest thereon, only under the following
conditions :
A. For a period of fifteen years from the date on
which such an extension is completed and approved in writing
by the city, the city will add a charge to be refunded to
the petitioner, as set forth below, for each connection made
to such extension pursuant to a written request for a
service lateral connection thereto from a property owner.
B. Such charge shall be a front footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the
said cost of installation of said extension prorated over
the total front footage of the petitioner' s property
fronting on such extension.
C. * * *
SECTION 3 . That Section 17 . 16 . 337 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to return of city' s expenses, be, and
the same hereby is , amended as follows :
17 . 16. 337 Return of city' s expenses.
-2-
A. During a period of fifteen years from the date on
which an extension is completed where the city has advanced
all or part of the funds for such extension and has decided
to obtain a refund of expense therefor for connections
thereto, the city shall make a proportional charge based
upon the following formula for any connection to such
extension pursuant to a written request for a service
lateral connection thereto from a property owner.
B. Such charge shall be a front footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the
said cost of installation of the extension prorated over the
total front footage of the petitioner' s property fronting on
the extension.
SECTION 4 . That Section 17 . 16 . 530 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to fire protection pipes be, and the
same hereby is, amended as follows :
17 . 16 .530 Fire protection pipes - Meter required when.
Should water be used through unmetered fire pipes or
fire pipes with detector meters or fire pipes having only
outside fire hydrants attached for other than fire purposes
the public utilities director may require the disconnection
of the fire system until adequate payment is made for use of
said water, and said director may require that an approved
meter be installed upon the fire system at the owner' s
expense, and no water shall be delivered to such fire system
until such meter is paid for and installed and the estimated
-3-
unmetered water used is paid for. The type of meter
installation shall be determined by the public utilities
director.
SECTION 5 . That Section 17 . 16 . 670 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to minimum charges be, and the same
hereby is , amended as follows:
17. 16 . 670 Minimum charges.
A. The minimum charge for the first one thousand cubic
feet of water used each month through each service
connection shall be based on meter size used, as set out in
Table 17 . 16 . 670 . The minimum charge for meters larger than
ten inches shall be based proportionately on meter capacity,
as determined by the public utilities director. After the
first one thousand cubic feet of water is delivered through
the meter each month, charges for additional water shall be
controlled by Section 17 . 16 . 680 of this chapter, or its
successor.
B. All nonmetered fire protection systems and fire
protection systems that include a detector check meter shall
have a monthly minimum standby charge which is less than
that required in subparagraph A above, as determined by the
public utilities director. On all fire protection pipes
where a fire flow meter is required, the charges shall be
controlled by subsection A above.
SECTION 6 . That Section 17 . 44 . 200 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to extensions - refund of expenses -
conditions be, and the same hereby is, amended as follows :
-4-
17.44 .200 Extensions - refund of expenses -
conditions.
The certified cost of the petitioner' s installation of
the extension, or money deposited pursuant to Sections
17 .44 . 170 or 17 . 44 . 190 of this chapter, or successor
sections, may be partially or completely refunded, without
interest thereon, only under the following conditions :
A. During a period of fifteen years from the date on
which such an extension is completed and approved in writing
by the city, the city will add a charge to be refunded to
the petitioner, as set forth below, for each connection made
to such extension pursuant to a written request for a
service lateral connection thereto from a property owner.
B. Said charge shall be a front-footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the
cost of installation of such extension prorated over the
total front footage of the petitioner' s property fronting on
the extension.
C. * * *
SECTION 7 . That Section 17 . 44 . 210 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to return of city' s expenses be, and the
same hereby is, amended as follows :
17 .44 . 210 Return of city's expenses.
A. During a period of fifteen years from the date on
which an extension is completed where the city has advanced
all or part of the funds for each extension and has decided
-5-
to obtain a refund of expense thereof from connections
thereto, the city shall make an additional proportional
charge based upon the following formula for any connection
to such extension pursuant to a written request for service
lateral connection thereto from a property owner.
B. Such charge shall be a front footage charge
prorated against the property to be served, based upon the
said cost of installation of the extension prorated over the
total front footage of the petitioner' s property fronting on
the extension .
SECTION 8 . That Section 17 . 72 . 030 of the Salt Lake
City Code, relating to sewer fees be, and the same hereby
is, amended as follows :
17 .72. 030 * * *
SEWER FEES.
Effective September 15 , 1990, the public utilities director
shall charge and the city treasurer shall collect the
following fee:
1 . Sewer and miscellaneous inspection $60 . 00
2 . Sewer repair inspection $30 . 00
3 . Trial sewer survey $35 . 00
4 . Sewer survey $100 . 00
5 . Resurvey additional charge each occasion $35 . 00
6 . The charge for installation of sewer special wyes shall
be determined by the director of public utilities,
which cannot exceed the city' s actual costs plus
reasonable overhead.
-6-
V
7 . Wastewater discharge permit $20 . 00
8 . Grease and sand trap inspection $30 . 00
9 . Connection fees on new development property.
(a) Residential single dwelling, and condominium, and
twin homes per connection or unit $500 . 00
(b) Multifamily dwellings
(i) Duplex $750 . 00
(ii ) Triplex $1 , 125 . 00
(iii ) Townhouse (apartment) , per unit
$375 . 00
(c) Hotels and motels
(i ) Per dwelling unit without kitchen or
restaurant $250 . 00
( ii ) Per dwelling unit with a kitchen or
restaurant $333 . 00
(iii ) Per dwelling unit with a kitchen and a
restaurant, plus fixture units in
restaurant $333 . 00
(d) General commercial and industrial uses , per each
equivalent fixture unit (based on Utah Plumbing
Code) $25 . 00
(e) Trailer parks , per equivalent unit (three trailer
spaces shall equal one residential single dwelling
unit) $500 . 00 .
( f ) Recreation parks per equivalent unit (six trailer
spaces shall equal one residential single dwelling
unit) $500 . 00
-7-
(g) Special industrial and commercial uses, including
carwashes , laundromats, etc. , as determined by the
City' s public utilities director, shall be charged
$25 . 00 per equivalent fixture unit, as specified
in the Uniform Plumbing Code.
10 . Connection fees on property with prior development.
(a) When a residential building is demolished, there
is no new sewer connection fee for the property
when residential use or building type is same as
prior to demolition. After 5 years from date of
demolition no credit will be given for prior sewer
connection fees and the property owner will be
required to pay all applicable fees .
(b) When a commercial building such as a hotel, motel ,
industrial building, etc. is demolished there is
no sewer connection fee for the property when the
new use is the same as prior to demolition,
otherwise, the sewer fee shall be based and
charged on the new or additional use pursuant to
the applicable provisions of 9c, d, e, f , and g
herein . After 5 years from date of demolition no
credit will be given for prior sewer connection
fees and the property owner will be required to
pay all applicable fees .
11 . Temporary sewer connections may only be made by
approval of the public utilities director. Temporary
-8-
connections cannot exceed 24 months . The fee for each
temporary connection shall be $100 . 00 . All other
applicable fees will be effective for temporary
connections .
SECTION 9 . This Ordinance shall take effect on the -
date of its first publication.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah,
this day of , 1990 .
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
RLM: cc
-9-
AI IIIAN All
thofriffintimmimmissimismommimmsissit
f ;A901 South 300 West
October ' 2 ,- 1996 • • P.O. Box27047
Salt Lake City, Utah 84127
Telephone(801)467-DUNN
Salt Lake City Council
City and County Building #304
451 South State
Salt Lake City , UT 84111
Re : 2165 West (DeLong St . ) 500 South Sewer Project .
Dear Council Member :
Our Company has owned, operated and leased property at 542--
565 South DeLong Street for nearly twenty years . As you are aware
we have been without sewer for the entire time . In the past twelve
months we were once again denied sewer service when our adjacent
property owners voiced their opposition to the current 5th South
sewer project and its extension onto DeLong Street .
We have agreed to pay for the sewer to our property and
all of the associated costs , However , the current Salt Lake
City ordinance prohibits us from receiving a return on our
investment after 5 years following the installation of the
sewer . The five year prohibition needs to be extended to ten
years or beyond and a pro-rata payment schedule established .
It seems only fair that if we are going to invest our capital
in a public sewer project that Salt Lake City protects our
investment from those unwilling to bear the initial cost , beyond
the current five year period .
Yours truly ,
(-)4f44.4.L., <41A -"
Dennie Dunn
DLD/c1h
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BOARD APPOINTMENTS
NEW APPOINTMENTS
SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL
Jerry Stanger to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Lynn
Jacobsen, for a term extending through July 1993. Mr. Stanger, who lives in
District 5, is an account executive and advertising agent and is involved in
several community service projects.
:_tsy SutheAld to •- a. -.in •d t. fill . :cancy ted hlee
McM- on, • a to m ex -n• ng thro •h July " Ms. herlan ives in
l'strict 7 an. ' a teat' er.CGlJ171-KfreZeA1/l V-z7)
Rick Ith to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Jennifer Stevens,
for a term extending through July 1993. Mr. Ith, who resides in District 6,
is the co-owner of a retail store and has been on several community boards.
Ann S. Berman to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Gerald
McDonough, for a term extending through July 1992. Ms. Berman, who resides
in District 5, is a librarian and has membership and affiliation with several
community and professional organizations.
Mark L. Lawrence to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Stephen
Goldsmith, for a term extending through July 1992. Mr. Lawrence has been
active in neighborhood activities for several years. He is a carpenter living
in District 2.
Perrin R. Love to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Peter
Emerson, for a term extending through July 1992. Mr . Love, an attorney for
Watkiss and Saperstein, lives in District 5 and has served on several
community committees.
URBAN FORESTRY BOARD
Lynn M. Hilton to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Lloyd
Siegendorf, for a term extending through April 8, 1993. Mr. Hilton, residing
in District 2, is an educational and Middle East specialist, and a former
state legislator for Utah.
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BOARD REAPPOINTMENTS
REAPPOINTMENTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Curley Jones to be reappointed to his first full term extending through
July, 1993. Mr. Jones who lives in District 4 is a librarian and a member of
the Salt Lake Branch of the NAACP.
Bernice Cook to be reappointed to her second term extending through
July, 1993. Ms. Cook resides in District 2 and has been involved in community
affairs for several years.
Nancy Saxton to be reappointed to her second term extending through
July, 1993. Ms. Saxton lives in District 4 and is a respiratory therapist .
If Ms. Saxton, Ms. Cook and Mr. Jones are reappointed, the membership of CDAC
will consist of three citizens from District 1 , two from District 2, two from
District 3, four from District 4, one from District 5, none from District 6
and two from District 7.
SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL
Sharon Alderman to be reappointed to her first full term extending
through July, 1993. Ms . Alderman lives in District 2 and is an artist and
writer .
Stan Roberts to be reappointed to a second term extending through July,
1993. Mr. Roberts, who resides in District 6, is an artist and has been the
President of the Utah Designer Craftsman Guild.
D'Arcy Dixon Pignanelli to be reappointed to a second term extending
through July, 1993. Ms. Pignanelli resides in District 3 and has worked in
local government . If Mr. Roberts , Ms. Pignanelli and Ms. Alderman are
reappointed, the membership of the Salt Lake Arts Council will consist of one
citizen from District 1, one from District 2, five from District 3, three from
District 4, four from District 5, two from District 6 and none from District
7.
PALMER DEPAULIS 542�.11 a�gl( ADS/�r�i� I
MAYOR
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE 535-7704
July 30, 1990
Alan Hardman, Chairperson, and
Members of the Salt Lake City Council
451 South State Street, Room 304
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Dear Alan:
I am transmitting herewith recommendations for board appointments which I
would appreciate the Council to advise and consent upon:
SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL
Stan Roberts to be reappointed to a second term extending
through July, 1993
Sharon Alderman to be appointed to her first full term extending
through July, 1993
D'Arcy Dixon Pignanelli to be reappointed to a second term extending
through July, 1993
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Bernice Cook to be reappointed to her second term extending
through July, 1993
Curley Jones to be appointed to his first full term extending
through July, 1993
Nancy Saxton to be reappointed to her second term extending
through July, 1993
PALMER DEPAULIS \J "�+(M���t +++1
MAroR
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 306
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE 535-7704
August 27, 1990
Alan Hardman, Chairperson, and
Members of the Salt Lake City Council
451 South State Street, Room 304
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Dear Alan:
I am transmitting herewith recommendations for board appointments which I
would appreciate the Council to advise and consent upon:
SALT LAKE ARTS COUNCIL
Jerry Stanger, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Lynn
Jacobsen, for a term extending through July 1993
Betsy Sutherland, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by
Kathleen McMahon, for a term extending through July 1993
Rick Ith, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Jennifer
Stevens , for a term extending through July 1993
Ann S. Berman, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by Gerald
McDonough, for a term extending through July 1992
Mark L. Lawrence, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by
Stephen Goldsmith, for a term extending through July 1992
Perrin R. Love, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by
Peter Emerson, for a term extending through July 1992
URBAN FORESTRY BOARD
Lynn M. Hilton, to be appointed to fill a vacancy created by
Lloyd Siegendorf, for a term extending through April 8, 1993
V x
y
•
MIKE ZUHL Si /��'(JftYfCORPa
m,r4 .a,, r ..ice �)�vay� LEE KING
INTERIM DIRECTOR DEPUTY DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 418
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE 535-7777
To: Salt Lake City Council August 30, 1990
Re: Proposed Demolition Ordinance
Recommendation: That the City Council hold a public hearing on October 2,
1990 at 6:20 p.m. to discuss a proposed demolition ordinance.
Availability of Funds: Not applicable
Discussion and Background: The present ordinance does not clearly outline
the demolition procedures. The proposed ordinance clearly outline the
procedures and make three major changes they are as follows:
1) Increases the demolition fees to cover the costs of enforcement of
the weed covenant (if the structure is demolished) , or enforcement
of the boarding and securing.
2) Notification requirements of community councils and adjoining
property owners with appeal procedures.
3) Makes all demolitions, with the exception of emergencies,
appealable to the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. This will
eliminate the discretion of the Building Official.
Legislative Action: The City Attorney's Office has prepared and approved
the ordinance and it is ready for your action.
S I•mitted by:
Av4,1
CHAEL B. ZUHL
nterim Direct r
ROGER R. EVANS S�� ' S a �' 4L 4 tail HARVEY F. BOYD
DIRECTOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Building and Housing Services
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 406
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111
TELEPHONE 535-6436
TO: Mike Zuhl
f6'
FROM: Roger Evans
DATE: August 15, 1990
RE: Demolition Ordinance
Attached herewith is the rewrite of the Demolition Ordinance for the City
Council approval. The three main changes to the ordinance are as follows:
1. Increase the demolition fees to-cover the costs of enforcement of the weed
covenant (if the structure is demolished) , or enforcement on the boarding
and securing.
2. Notification requirements of community councils and adjoining property
owners with appeal procedures.
3. Make all demolitions, with the exception of emergencies, appealable to the
Housing Advisory and Appeals Board. This will eliminate the discretion of
the Building Official.
Attached is the memorandum from Bruce Baird and the minutes from the HAAB.
RRE:rm
Attachmer''
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 1990
(Amending Chapter 64 of Title 18
dealing with demolishing buildings )
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 64 OF TITLE 18 DEALING WITH
DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS .
WHEREAS, the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, has
reviewed the current City code dealing with demolition of
buildings and has determined that the amendments below are
appropriate for the development of the City:
NOW, THEREFORE,
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
SECTION 1 . That existing Chapter 18 . 64 . 010, et seq. ,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is hereby
repealed.
SECTION 2 . That Chapter 18 . 64 . 010, et seq. , be reenacted
as follows :
18 . 64. 010 Permit Required.
It shall be unlawful to demolish any building or structure
in the City or cause the same to be demolished without first
obtaining a peiiuit for demolition of each such building or
structure from the City Building Official .
18 . 64. 020 . Application for Permit.
To obtain a permit for demolition, an applicant must submit
an application in writing in a form furnished by the Building
Official for that purpose . Each application shall :
1 . Identify and describe the type of work to be performed
under the permit;
2 . State the address of the structure or building to be
demolished;
3 . Describe the building or structure to be demolished
including the type of use, type of building construction, size
and square footage, number of stories and number of residential
dwelling units ( if applicable) ;
4 . Indicate the method and location of demolished material
disposal;
5 . Identify the approximate date of commencement and
completion of demolition;
6 . Indicate if fences , barricades, scaffolds or other
protections are required by any City code for the demolition and,
if so, their proposed - location and compliance;
7 . State whether fill material will be required to restore
the site to level grade after demolition and, if required, the
approximate amount of fill material;
8 . If the building or structure to be demolished contains
any dwelling units , the application should state whether any of
the dwelling units are presently occupied.
18 . 64 . 030 Fees and Signature.
A. The permit. application shall be signed by the party or
the party' s authorized agent requesting the permit. Signature on
the permit application constitutes a certification by the signee
that the information contained in the application is true and
correct .
-2-
B. The fee for a demolition permit application shall be
based on the building floor area:
BUILDING FLOOR AREA FEE
5 - 2000 square feet $60 . 00
2001 - 4000" square feet 70 . 00
4001 - 6000 square feet 80 . 00
6001 - 8000 square feet 110 . 00
8001 - 10, 000 square feet 120 . 00
10 , 001 - 12 , 000 square feet 150 . 00
12 , 001 - 14 , 000 square feet 180 . 00
14 , 001 - 16 , 000 square feet 210 . 00
16 , 001 - 18 , 000 square feet 240 . 00
18 , 001 - 20 , 000 square feet 265 . 00
20 , 001 - 22, 000 square feet 300 . 00
22, 001 - 24 , 000 square feet 340 . 00
24 , 001 - 26 , 000 square feet 370 . 00
26 , 001 - 28 , 000 square feet 410 . 00
28, 001 - 30 , 000 square feet 450 . 00
30, 001 - 32, 000 square feet 485 . 00
For each 500 square feet over 32, 000 add an additional $10 . 00
C . If landscaping is not required by the zoning, or if a
landscaping waiver is sought pursuant to Section 18 . 64 . 070, an
additional fee for 'the cost of inspecting the property to
determine it is kept free of weeds and junk materials shall be
collected in the amount of $100 . 00 . If a waiver request is
denied, the $100 . 00 paid under this subsection shall be
refunded .
-3-
D. Landscaping waiver requests shall also pay a fee of
$170 . 00 for the cost of the landscape waiver process .
18.64.040 Post-demolition Use Plan Required.
No demolition permit shall be issued until one of the
following requirements has been met:
A. A permit for the use replacing the demolished building
or structure has been issued by the Building and Housing
Division;
B. A landscaping plan for the site, showing the sprinkling
system and planted areas , has been approved and a performance
bond tc assure timely and proper installation and maintenance of
the landscaping has been filed with the City if a form
acceptable to the City. , In the event the Building Official
determines that landscaping is impracticable or unnecessary
given the :characteristics of the site and the neighborhood, the
landscaping requirement may be waived subject to the provisions
of Section 18 . 64 . 070 below;
C. In the event of a force majeure event or where
immediate demolition and clearing of the land is necessary to
remove hazardous or blighting conditions, the building officer
may waive the landscaping requirement and order immediate
demolition.
18 .64 . 050 Residential Demolition Comment Provisions.
If the structure for which a demolition permit is sought
contains residential dwelling units, the Building Official shall
mail a written notice to the owners and residents of properties
within a six hundred foot radius from the property line of the
-4-
property on which the proposed demolition work will take place
as shown on the list equalized property tax assessment roll .
The notice shall specify the property proposed for demolition
and provide that comments may be made to the Building Official
within fifteen days of the date of the notice.
18. 64 .060 Residential Structure Demolition.
A. Demolition permits for structures containing
residential dwelling units which are entirely vacated may be
issued no sooner than twenty days from the date the required
post-demolition use plan of Section 18 . 64 . 040 above is accepted .
B. If any of the residential dwelling units in the
structure proposed for demolition is occupied, the demolition
permit may not be issued sooner than forty-five days after the
required post-demolition use plan is accepted.
18 .64.070 Post-demolition Use Plan Waiver Procedure.
A. If a waiver of the post-demolition use plan is sought
under Section 18 . 64 . 040 (B) above, the applicant shall file with
the Building Official , on a form provided therefor, a statement
of any claimed hardship or other special circumstances
justifying waiver of the post-demolition use plan requirements .
B. The application fee for a waiver shall be $50 . 00 .
C . The Building Official shall mail a written notice to
the owners of properties within a six hundred foot radius from
the edge of the property on which the proposed demolition work
will take place as shown on the last equalized property tax
assessment roll and any affected neighborhood based organization
recognized pursuant to Section 2 . 60 . 020 (C) . The notice shall
-5-
( h state the reasons given by the applicant for waiving the post-
demolition use plan and state the date, time and location of a
hearing before the City' s Housing Advisory and Appeals Board .
D. The chairperson of the Housing Advisory and Appeals
Board shall select a panel of three examiners from the roster of -
members and schedule a hearing date no sooner than fifteen days
from the date of the petition and no later than thirty days from
the date of the petition.
E. In determining whether to waive the post-demolition use
landscaping requirements , the Board may consider the effects on
surrounding properties, the character of the neighborhood, the
Master Plan for the area, future plans for the property and
similar factors .
18 . 64. 080 Predemolition Salvage Permits.
A. A predemolition salvage permit for other than
structural demolition shall be required for the removal of
doors, windows, special glass , fixtures , fittings , pipes ,
railings , posts, panels , boards , lumber, stones, bricks , marble,
etc . , on the exterior or interior of the building .
B. A predemolition salvage permit fee shall be paid in the
amount of twenty percent of the demolition fee.
18 . 64. 090 Expiration.
Permits shall expire forty-five calendar days from the date
of issuance, unless a completion date allowing more time is
requested and approved by the Building Official at the time of
application. Demolition permits may be renewable upon request
prior to expiration with approval of the Building Official for
-6-
one-half of the original permit fee, provided continuous
progress is being made. If a permit is allowed to expire
without the prior renewal, any subsequent request for
reinstatement shall be accompanied by a reinstatement fee equal
to the original demolition permit fee.
18 .64. 100 Qualifications to do Work.
It shall be unlawful for demolition work permitted under
this chapter to be performed except by:
A. A subcontractor currently holding a license in good
standing with the State of Utah to do wrecking and/or demolition
work.
B. A licensed general contractor currently holding a
license in good standing with the State of Utah qualified as a
general contractor, but only when the demolition is incidental
and supplemental to the construction by the general contractor
of a new structure on the demolition site .
C. Salvage work under a predemolition salvage permit may
be done without a contractor' s license provided all other
conditions of this chapter are met .
18 . 64 . 110 Demolitions Requirement.
A. Prior to the commencement of any demolition or moving,
the permittee shall plug all sewer laterals at or near sidewalk
lines as staked out by the department of public utilities . No
excavation shall be covered until such plugging is approved by
the Department or by the Building Official . The permittee shall
further insure all utility services to the structure and/or
premises have been shut off and meters removed prior to
commencement of demolition work .
-7-
(:7\ B. When the applicant indicates the demolition will
require more than thirty days to complete, and where required by
the Building Official for the safety of the public, the
applicant shall also provide plans to fence the demolition site
so that it is inaccessible to unauthorized persons in a -manner
acceptable to the Building Official . The Building Official may
waive the fencing requirement if it is determined that fencing
would be inappropriate or unnecessary to protect safety or
health.
C. --A permit for demolition requires that all materials
comprising part of the existing structure(s) , including the
foundation and footings, be removed from the site. The
depression caused by the removal of such debris must be filled
back and compacted to the original grade, as approved by the
Building Official, with fill material excluding detrimental
amounts of organic material or large dimension nonorganic
material.
D. Permitted demolition work, including filling and
leveling back to grade and removal of required pedestrian
walkways and fences , must be completed within the permit period
unless the Building Official finds that any part of the
foundation of building or site will form an integral part of a
new structure to be. erected on the same site for which plans
have already been approved by the building division. In such
event, the Building Official may approve plans for appropriate
adjustments to the completion time and may impose reasonable
conditions including the posting of a bond, erection of fences ,
-8-
securing, or similar preventions to insure the site does not
create a hazard after the demolition is completed.
18. 64. 120 Relationship to Other Ordinance.
Provisions of this chapter shall be subordinate to any
contrary specific provisions of Chapters 21 . 64 . 010 , et seq. ,
dealing with demolition in the C-4 Zoning District, and Chapter
21 . 74 . 010 , et seq . , dealing with demolition in historical
districts .
SECTION 3 . This Ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon the date of its first publication .
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this
day of , 1990 .
CHAIRPERSON
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
Transmitted to the Mayor on
Mayor' s Action: Approved Vetoed.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY RECORDER
BRB:ap
-9-
ROGER F. CUTLER " ,.r,. �S� J41 gil'����,y��=llI ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS
CITY ATTORNEY RAY L. MONTGOMERY
STEVEN W. ALLRED LAW DEPARTMENT GREG R. HAWKINS
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY CITY AND COUNTY BUILDING LARRY V. SPEND
LOVE
BRUCE R. BAIRDRO
CHERYL D. LUKE 451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 505 - FRANK M. NAKAMURA
CITY PROSECUTOR
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 ASSISTANT PROSECUTORS
TELEPHONE (801) 535-7788 GLEN A. COOK
JANICE L. FROST
FAX (801) 535-7640 MARSHA ATKIN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Harvey Boyd
Building & Housing
FROM: Bruce Baird
Assistant City Attorney
DATE: July 30, 1990
RE: Demolition Ordinance
Acc7_npanying this memorandum you will find the revised
Demolition Ordinance with the new fee structure which we have
discussed. Since this has already gone through HAAB, please send
it down to the Mayor' s office with the appropriate cover letter,
copies , etc .
BRB:ap
-2-
Demolition Ordinance - Harvey Boyd said that he was hoping to have the revised
ordinance for today's meeting, but Bruce Baird turned it down again. He said
that the-problem was the base fee of $423.00 regardless of the size of the
unit and Mr. Baird said that it could not be done that way, so the permit
fees have been broken down and will be as they previously were for commercial
buildings, but the residential will be broken down into four categories:.
garages or outbuildings - $40.00, hares 120 square feet to 900 square feet -
$350.00, 901 square feet to 1250 square feet - $422.00 and over 1251 square
feet - $472.00.
Ceiling headroom height decisions - Harvey Boyd presented the ors with a
draft of the ceiling headroom height decisions fray previous HAAB cases
including 1990. Karen Wikstran suggested that the decisions be categorized
according to what the reason for the decision. Roger Borgenicht suggested
organizing the decisions according to height. Karen Wikstran suggested
organizing by "denied" or "approved. " Maj-Greth Holmberg said that when the
panel goes on an inspection, there is usually time before the meeting and with
the draft in hand, some time could be taken to go through it. Jody Williams
suggested reviewing the draft and then crane back with sane suggestions as to
how it could be improved. Bill Bohling said that possibly this information
should not be used without referring back to the minutes.
Report on Housing Code Survey - Harvey Boyd said that he is in the process of
going through the information he requested fran other cities and they have
identified Portland and Seattle have real good programs and their way of
working anneals is very interesting. He said that the survey should be
available in June.
Maj-Greth Holmberg made a motion that the Housing Crr3Q Survey be held to the
May 23, 1990 mooting and that the panel members came back with suggestions and
reorganize this draft together with the information that Roger Evans will be
working out with Harvey Boyd, seconded by Karen Wikstram. Motion p s sed.
Selection of new chairperson and vice Chairperson - Karen Wi kst nm normnatc1
Ron Rowley to serve as Chairperson and Maj-Greth Holmberg for vice
chairperson, seconded by Afton Kyriopoulos Motion pssed.
Rill Bohling ma& a motion that nominations cease, seconded by Karen Wien.
Motu passed.
Harvey Boyd said that Maj-Greth Holmberg and Afton Kyriopoulos has been
appointed by the Mayor to serve another teen on the Board.
Ron Rowley said that he would like to express the appreciation of the Board to
Jody Williams and Ed Lunt for what they have done for the Board. He said that
Jody Williams has taken pride in serving on the Board and has been a definite
asset.
Lois Brown made a recommendation that a letter of appreciation from the Board
be sent to Jody and Ed.
Discuss changing date of field trips to Tuesday - Harvey Boyd said that the
only reason for changing the day for the field trip from Monday to Tuesday is
the van is not available on Mondays and it is too hard to have a discussion
traveling in two cars.
-3-
j `Jamta►'y 3I , 1590
federal government will take it back. He said that the program is not
operating at one hundred percent so Capitol Planning is in the process of
revising their program description and that HUD has an expert on this program
and will craning to Salt Lake City to offer advise. Mr. Buchanan said that
they are considering taking sate of the non-profits and offer the money to
them on a deferred payment b sis to get the money out there and there has been
some interest shown. He said that they are now going through the process of
reevaluating the program and deciding where-their priorities are, trying to
decide what the housing policy of the community is and how this can work.
Mr. Buchanan said that any day now he will receive notice that he has forty-
five days to submit his application to HUD and thirty days of that are
consumed internally getting things processed, so he may have three weeks to
develop a pLcyiam and get it back to HAAB to review. He said that he would
like to orientate towards is a simple implementation task.
Ron Rowley suggested that as soon as Mr. Buchanan has this definition, get
back with Harvey Boyd and schedule a review. Jody Williams suggested that, if
Mr. Buchanan receives notice immediately, he could take the draft Housing
Policy that HAAB recommended approval on today and use that as input.
Demolition Ordinance - Harvey Boyd said that he has discussed with Bruce
Baird, City Attorney, and Mr. Baird has said that there is no way a demolition
permit fee schedule can be implemented that is tied to the units or as
exorbitant as it was originally set. He said that the fee was suggested to
get people to give a second thought before tearing down a building and create
a fund for additional housing rehab or new construction. Mr. Boyd said that
Mr. Baird told him to determine the cost to the City to cause a demolition to
occur and what was found out was it does not cost much more to do a single-
family residence as it did to do a twenty or thirty unit apartment because the
inspector checks to see that the utilities are cut and any barricades needed
are in place. Mr. Boyd said that once the lot is cleared, the re-inspection,
addressing any problems that cane up, such as weeds, notice and orders, etc. ,
was no different on single-family residences than other buildings and then
came up with a fee of $190 and after the first year - $60.00 and came up with
the figure of $17.00 per hour.
Ed Lunt suggested that Mr. Boyd re-figure the cost by including his time, the
secretary's time and HAAB time. Jody Williams said that the notification
costs and title search fees should be included in the fee. Mr. Boyd said that
he would do that and pass it on to Mr. Baird.
Building Fee Waivers - Harvey Boyd said that the City Council approved
Ordinance No. 66 of 198'8 that allows the Director of Community Development to
approve waivers of building and demolition permit fees for non-Euvfit
organizations so that the lcney that would be turned over would be rolled in
to the project and help groups out, such as Habitat for Humanity and
Redevelopment Agency furthering their monies. He said that there are two
requests and HAAB is required to make a recommendation to the Director of ' .
Community Development. Mr. Boyd said that Habitat for Humanity is asking that
building fees be waived on four sites that would provide housing for low-
income families and the projects are located at: 557 Grant Street, a three-
bedroom home for an addition and remodel; new construction of a handicapped
accessible throc bedroom home on a vacant lot at approximately 555 Grant
DEMOLITION ORDINANCE BRIEFING
October 2, 1990
Proposed Demolition Ordinance
(1) Building Official does not have the discretion to waive, only
circumstances outlined in 18.64.040(c) .
(2) Changes the fee structure to reflect cost of enforcement.
(3) $100.00 fee charged if landscaping is waived. This fee is for the
enforcement of weeds.
(4) $170.00 filing fee for landscape waiver requests.
(5) Notification requirement for residential demolitions.
(a) Notify property owners within 600 foot radius.
(b) Fifteen (15) day response time.
(6) If structures are empty, there is a twenty (20) day waiting period for
the issuance of the permit.
(7) If structure is occupied, there is a forty-five (45) day waiting period.
(8) $50.00 application fee for waiver of post-demolition plan.
(9) Housing Advisory and Appeals Board (HAAB) to review all requests far
waivers of post-demolition plan.
(10) Notification of adjoining property owners within 600 feet.
. "Coup it t®`Hold`Pub1AAlic eatlt
The.;Salt:Lake}City. Council;,in' $100-"fee-toypay_thec osCfokieity tt-
• ' old a public-hearing Tuesday.on`;,spe�?ons.to make'suie roe . tba
' P P 1'h'.
°. •xa used ailiendinents toaa city ord1- v.'doesn't have.to.be,landscaped• after.
dance'-governing'the.demolition`of«demolition renlains_clear.'o f w o
'A;T;;,'and junk. "`••
jti:,tl'lie;hearing is scheduled•for.'6:20, -',:'In.addition; ifCsomeone seeks.to.1
--=pp m.in Room 315.of the City-County: demolish ;a house for apartment
rcilt
wilding;451 S.State.St.Thecouncil,A'buiiding,the'proposed •amendment
conveneoffic1ally`at 6 p.m.,ac ,.would require"'`city.;building;.and,1ording to_a posted agenda. !i .I ri.—r��,�housing.officials tonotify in;wratin►g.i`the: ro ose`d endments woul 'residents and jandowners within
-','''�clarify;procedui�for how'.wai vers 7.r'6 -footradiuspf aargeted
uirem \the ordinance can tuneemtimeeo commesntt on n.
,
"r e' anted, _ * t city attor .'. the'demol oll. � ± •
'$ cs The �- If the'Hot"i`t.
ents;-would`place the povrce Aof ypeals�Board sc ul a
•
• t, nting`vvaivers,under the authority' eeliqnt td�,�1 0 -,.
e if the'Housing'Adviskfry rpiacl p= stru cture;',!th&ut1? ding e"
eals Board.:Currently,,;bui1dtng-ApV, a plan,or? ;r . ,girth: ' ,. .'.�
-:, ffictij_011sb allg�antwalV= Used'ilftei: i,i= • „0 I0 lit �t.it
{ •7. i din9nce requirements,.:;;'! officials also v o'uld be,required.'to
' ,notify area" ;neighborhood organiza-
char►g• . also contain a ¢w `lions'as well j as,'resldents and fan
— ' owners living within a 600-foot radi-'
,us.of the targeted.structure of the •
date and time:of the.hearing.
In`other�busiriess",:athe ouncil is'-
scheduled to set an Oet.'l8°date for a
public hearing on amending the cur-
rent fiscal year budget and to adopt a '
resolution to make a Utah State Re--
tirement Board group insurance
nlan availahla to city employees.
SALT LAKE CITY BUILDING AND HOUSING STAFF RPM
Guidelines and Procedures for Landscape Waiver Decisions
OVERVIEW
This is a staff report of suggested guidelines and procedures for determining
landscape waiver decisions.
BACKGROUND
The landscape waiver approval and denial was initiated in 1985 as a
requirement of the demolition ordinance, No. 88. Since January of 1986, HAAB
has reviewed landscape waiver requests. Since January of 1988 it has approved
4 of the requests, partially approved 1, and denied 1.
ANALYSIS
Chapter 18.64 DIIMOLITION provides that in applying for demolition permits,
owners must have a valid permit for replacement or present a landcape plan.
The landscape plan must include the planting of lawn and a sprinkling system.
The owner may file the form "Appeal to the Building Official" to ask for
allowances. In making his decision, the building offical calls for a
recommendation of the Community Council. Owners of the property may appeal
the building official's decision to HAAB, which can waive the landscape
requirement or grant less-than-full compliance. (Copies of the Appeal to the
Building Official, letter to Community Council, and Individual and Corporate
Demolition Covenants are attached
In examining landscape waiver requests, there are a number of often
complicated factors that must be considered by the HAAB members. It is
impossible to set hard and fast guidelines since neighborhoods often have very
different feelings and objectives. However, we can further define the process
and identify the factors that should be considered during the review process.
Factors which should be reviewed by the HAAB fall into the five categories
below. Data on these factors will be supplied to HAAB in a staff report.
1. Content of the Appeal
a. Copy of the Demolition Review Form
•
b. Copy of Landscape Waiver Appeals Form
2. Description of Property and Structures •
•
a. Current or last use (i.e. residential or commercial; no. of units if
residential)
Occupied or vacant? If vacant, date it was last occupied.
Current zoning of property.
b. Condition of building
Evidence whether or not building meets minimum building codes;
liklihood building could be repaired (depending upon severity of
problems and probable cost of repairs) .
If housing enforcement case, case history and remaining deficiencies.
If structure had fire, the date, cause, and extent of damage.
c. Evidence that building has not been stripped of its components nor
purposefully allowed to deteriorate to become a blight and hazard to
the community.
d. Historical significance of building.
3. Development Activity
a. Uses on adjacent land
b. Land use plan and objectives of the Planning Department for the block
or neighborhood.
c. Development trends for the block or neighborhood, including any
proposed new uses on adjacent properties.
d. Potential for development of the parcel. Indicate if there are
unusual conditions, such as two homes on a lot, unusual typography, or
whether demolition would result in an unbuildable lot.
4. Comments and Information on Impact of Proposed Demolition
a. Copies of any letters from the community council, and from
-organizations active in the neighborhood, such as NHS. •
b. Copies of any letters from the adjoining owners.
c. Staff estimate of impact the landscape waiver would have on
adjacent properties.
d. Planning staff comments.
5. Staff Recommendation
a. Indicate if staff recommends less than full compliance with landscape
requirements, such as landscaping a buffer area, fencing all or part
of lot, allowing lot to become part of yard of another house, etc.
b. If staff recommends similar a decision similar to one earlier made for
an adjoining or proximate lot, indicate this.
The staff report should be provided to the HAAB members on or before the field
trip visit.
Qs: not covered, and why
1. Visibility: very subjective measure. Most negative aspects of
unlandscaped lots will be addressed by the other evidence included.
2. Short-term development plans of owner: too easy for him to give plans he
can't or doesn't intend to carry out. Item 3, Development Activity should
reveal reasonable plans.
SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE
No. of 1985
(Demolition)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5 OF THE REVISED ORDINANCES OF
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH, 1965, IS AMENDED, RELATING TO DEMOLITION.
Be it ordained by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah:
Section 1. That Section 5-8-1, Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City,
is repealed and re-enacted to read as follows:
Section 5-8-1. Demolition fees. A fee for each demolition permit shall
be paid to the City.as follows:
BUILDING SIZE IN FLOOR AREA FEE
5 - 2000 square feet $ 40.00 -%
2001 - 4000 square feet 50.00
4001 - 6000 square feet 70.00
6001 - 8000 square feet 90.00
8001 - 10,000 square feet 110.00
10,001 - 12,000 square feet 133.00
12,001 - 14,000 square feet 161.00
14,001 - 16,000 square feet 189.00
16,001 - 18,000 square feet 217.00
18,001 - 20,000 square feet 245.00
20,001 - 22,000 square feet 281.00
22,001 - 24,000 square feet 317.00
24,001 - 26,000 square feet 353.00
26,001 - 28,000 square feet 389.00
28,001 - 30,000 square feet 425.00
30,001 - 32,000 square feet 465.00
tY A. �;a,2