02/07/2022 - Minutes MINUTES
FROM THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
BOARD MEETING (CDCIP)
Monday, February 7, 2022
S:30pm
1. Board Members Board Members Not Present
Brooke Young, Chair Alicia Ryans
Heidi Steed, Co-Chair
Rich Nazzaro
Jake Skog
Loree Hagen
Elke Opsahl
Alyson Genovese
Jenny Bonk
Jason Motley
Staff Present
Kalli Ruiz, CAN Staff
Rachel Molinari, CAN Staff
Tammy Hunsaker, CAN Staff
Ben Luedtke, Council Staff
2. Staff Updates
There were no staff updates.
3. Approval of the Minutes
There were no minutes to approve.
4. Business
A. Welcome & Introductions
Ms. Steed welcomed the CDCIP members and City staff and opened the meeting on February 7,
2022. The board and staff offered individual introductions.
B. CDCIP Board Role & CIP Process Overview
Ms. Ruiz shared a presentation covering the CDCIP Board's role in the City's Capital
Improvement Program(CIP). In addition, the CIP timeline was provided that includes the steps
in the process from application submittal to final approval by the City Council.
The presentation slides are attached.
C. Summary Application Review
Ms. Ruiz summarized CIP data from previous years and provided the current information on the
FY2023 submissions. She said that a list of commonly used acronyms and descriptions of the
CIP funding sources would be provided to assist board members in the process. Ms. Ruiz added
that staff has been working to create a map and dashboard of past and current CIP projects as a
tool to better visualize where projects are being requested and where funding is being allocated.
She said that the board would have access to a FY23 map showing all current submissions that
includes district boundaries. Ms. Ruiz explained that access to all the applications would be
available in ZoomGrants as well as in Dropbox. She stated that some additional documents could
only be found in Dropbox as opposed the ZoomGrants, and that those details would be noted on
the homework sheet.
Ms. Genovese voiced concern on if the constituents had been informed of the review process this
year. Ms. Ruiz stated that staff worked hard to clearly communicate the requirements and
expectations for constituents going into the review process while acknowledging the board's
prior frustrations.
Ms. Hunsaker stated that the City is aware that it can improve in multiple areas of CIP, including
Capital Asset and Capital Facilities planning and acknowledged that there is a need for a
consolidated plan that has gone through the full adoption process. She said that once these plans
are in place it would minimize the difficulty of the CDCIP Board process. Ms. Hunsaker added
that the CIP team is also working on mapping equity indicators. These equity indicators will
focus on elements within a community that enhance a neighborhood's likelihood of upward
mobility and access to the resource that can enrich the community. She explained that the intent
of adding these indicators to the map is not to prioritize any of the applications, but rather to
provide a tool that allows one to look at the submissions through an equity lens which is a
priority to the Mayor and City Council.
Ms. Young and Ms. Steed both stated that they appreciated the efforts of staff to create a map
and that it would be helpful to the board.
Ms. Ruiz discussed the tentative meeting schedule and stated that the next meeting would occur
on Wednesday, February 16, 2022, as opposed to the usual Monday night due to it being the
Valentine's Day holiday. She said that she expected the last CDCIP Board meeting to take place
in early April 2022.
Ms. Bonk asked about the most appropriate way for board members communicate outside of
public meetings. Ms. Young said that she would be willing to meet with Ms. Bonk and the other
new board members to explain processes and answer any questions they have. She noted that a
group email with all board members would constitute a quorum. Ms. Steed reminded the board
that all emails are subject to Utah's Government Records Access and Management Act
(GRAMA) laws and that members of the public could request access to them as part of the
public record.
Ms. Ruiz said that the CDCIP Board members would be provided information on the Open
Public Meetings Act (OPMA), and the Government Records Access and Management
Act (GRAMA).
Ms. Genovese asked if staff could provide a list of all current members and their email addresses.
Ms. Ruiz agreed to provide that list.
5. Adjournment
There being no further business. Ms. Genovese made a motion to adjourn. Ms. Young
seconded the motion. The meeting was adjourned at 6:13pm.
Xr0000re Yoe
Brooke Young(Mar 3,2 Way
Brooke MST)
CDCIP Board Chair
This document along with the digital recording constitute the official minutes of the
CDCIP Board meeting held February 7, 2022.
„u,� w - _
4111111Igllhhp - .
I `' 1r ,� ! . r-
Now
40 op
0 ft. iv 1111r
III, -4161.411... P1141 tiVaisi..414110111PI.--"merim
evaillaw
iimitim
11,
LAKE CITr - . �.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & _ -� '
CAPITAL IMPROVEMNTP1ROGRAM
•
FY 22-23 Annual CIP elilltrill __,--_-aser-Illimp
•
L
moat :i .�` ',.
ti"ii, ._ ' L
• I • e ffiffi
frN1.
• •■ •■ .M, fillNIIIIII
I 0 Miil
, Y u 'I . ._ II II IIl At
, _ ■ i17u�iry Iu(� r + a �-. �..:I�1::N _ ■■ ■■ ' u� .ice`•• ����111��`�
{r9 1. '_ ” :.!'. {...T. lam::
AGENDA
• • . . .
. .
. .
l 4r
. .
•
.,,,,. • . . .• .. .
•
. ..
- ` '
_.-- ❑ Welcome ,. .,_
...
" _ .� • ,, ❑ Introduction ry
--. ❑ CDCIP Board Role & CI P Process Overview Y r.
r . - , .�_
llyy'l ❑ SummaryApplication Review �� �~
CIAdjourn .
N..
_:yea - 2t "..- r . jai.
Community Development & Capital Improvement
Program Board
THIS BOARD OVERSEES THE FOLLOWING :
ARTICLE I: Name and Authorization
Section 1
The name of this board shall be the Community Development and Capital Improvement Programs Advisory Board, hereafter
known as CDCIP.
Section 2
The CDCIP is created by authorization of Chapter 2.33 of the Salt Lake City Code.
ARTICLE II: Purpose and Responsibilities
Section 1
CDCIP shall act in an advisory capacity to the Mayor relative to the city's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) allocations from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the city's
Capital Improvement Program.
Section 2
The CDCIP board shall serve solely in an advisory role on decisions relating to funding allocations for the city's CDBG, ESG, and
Capital Improvement Program;
== SALT LAKE CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
((Jn
_
�,IT YEARLY TIMELINE
JAN MARCH APRIL JULY AUG NOV DEC
FUNDING 1p/ D.,P g.,,ro ,,, Mayor / City Counc". Applications Due
PROCESS I Board reviews and Mayor reviews and Creation of Mayor's City Council approves Applications due at
recommends Recommended City Council reviews and allocates funds for projects pro ect-s ecific bud ets
Requests due at
the end of the
recommends projects projects Budget P g month
Constituents with City Divisions
Constituents work with a City Division
the end of the on their Constituent Request
month
CITY IlifiaTLAtzbouPis aPI Se.freric'/////.�
DIVISIONSDesign and construction work for approved and active projects City Divisions work with Constituents
on the Constituent Request
-,—
j1111 - "PIP1111111"11111111P.----- ----—
!i
TOTAL CIP ALLOCATION FOR FY 21 - 22
$ 25 , 574, 540
A,
.7 i
I 1.
AIII
0
I� •'IH : "
• 1 * ' , ,
. , or.
...
-7
,_ _
1 I r1 T? 1
' `4 y o .y�
111
• Ili '_� • "44 41+ — r *' « —Li-
-' " - ' •1 - . ' • . .
a. : + Pr' Illlfllllil. t l um" ►' . A � ; 4r , y1, z! .....
{
'
Milliiillil
Requests For FY22-23 CIP Funding
Iripiiiiir: . .
..Solt...."-*4111r
, * .1L- -
:- 0 . , .,•111i• "'"*. .+,*. , 4,.
_, . , ., .. .
. .
.... _, .
:k . ,..
14
.. . t ,41f . -',.. ; ' . •,''.-• . ktiiiii W. 4 -t.
mr 774- , •- - •• •.061.7. ...."-`
.31111141:'. 4,,'......, e .. -*se
litrie 1 1-1‘abe-'''--.lie i'V*.` - . .. „ .‘Nlika... '`'a.0%,:lki. • -1 4..-••-Ilk. a
#51%.
a -a .T_ , _J. _--•' ..raj. ai�, -•-;.. _ _ -._^_ -• ' • _ _.y'w- L/Yi%�jat..,:y►r�w��
_Am3..�T '+}r--� s - 1� '�`�.a ��• - _ ar =r.�-:s -•� �:-•.' - -sue _ _ - - _.
a _ - -
r •
i-!s �• .. �1K - `-�4 f •
' �- 4^l..- - _ + F ar. ��.ar• ��'• �_ �'SL- ..�.l r : .
•
1 ' I .lit
in
.r a• .. „ y'd•rI
L
$72,961,491 in total requests . .
Applications : 41 Constituent, 11 Engineering, 2 Facilities, 2 Fire,
20 Parks & Public Lands, and 13 Transportation
r • 1
This Years Request for Federal 22 - 23 Funding
89 APPLICATIONS $ 72 , 961 , 491
IN TOTAL REQUESTS
545.250,94- fiTRn
Requested General Fund Available General Fund
$3,500,000 $TBD
Requested Class C Available Class C
$5,320,756 $TBD
Requested Impact Fees Available Impact Fees
$12,227,000 STBD
Requested 1/4 Cent Tax Available 1/4 Cent Tax
‹can nnn <TRm
Requested FOF Transit Available FOF Transit
$2,972,792 $TBD
Requested FOF Streets Available FOF Streets
$2,/00,000 $TBD
Requested FOF Public Safety Available FOF Public Safety
OP Mapping & Dashboard
I
Dept/Div Number of Projects
❑ Engineering Requested Funding (only 2023) Total Allocated Funding
❑Transportation
❑ Facilities 248 $ 72 , 961 ,491
❑ Public Lands $ 66,447 ,358
Year
❑ 2020 Last update:a few seconds ago Last update:a few seconds ago Last update:a few seconds ago
❑ 2021 _
❑ 2022 11 Ri v 17^� 1 .� °�° r lI 1 F
❑ 2023 Project List - ,. �_
h 7� 1i1; zoo o � � .-` i
Council District ��" • Li '1 n
laSLC Foothills Land Acquisitions I 7 15 I I • :,N r 500�N1 1 • • 10th Ave Mich ,)0
I 11 c. //pp.7 3 ■ I i - 8th Ave
Council District 1 Council District2 \ I LJ`I, 1 • 40 N ,o I � � '
Council District 3 Council District 4 ® Liberty Wells Traffic Calming ',,/,,
�hI a 30l N I : •o u• se 1 a
Y Jd
Council District 5 Council District 6 �in1 Golf ' i •� ' �� ".• � 0� t
Liberty Wells Traffic Calming oo s '- f
_ c
Council District 7 Citywide arse ' 1 3 u, �'• II Di ,x,
—fit '� S I) I �r
Constituent Application ?amp . *w 1 4—
, - 30l 5 University of
• Parks Critical Asset RenewalYr Utan
- ---`_ _31 _ e'oA\ N Shct L y �" .I • '7h/
Yes No -- soo S, soo. M I'C,-1 I r iw _606 s 1 �/ Th
Project Funded? Sugar House Safe Side Streets '\ e1 I i y, soo zoos . I II I .__ r Place H`a!ip
N J 90r 1 . 'Ti , Para
No Yes ` - --- _
900 S - i +rimer_ [ ..a
YalecrestTraffic Calming ' I
L East Bench Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety -' •. a i 1 fl' 1 13oo s e; m a •�� �`�
r
Iget Dr ��_ I I ii I n\ _ -
Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 r I d L.
I _ f 3 0 E r a
Glendale Golf / t m w 1j ^
L McClelland Shared Street Phase 2a Improvements I y10o,, a Course \ 3 7 o
m C
Folsom Trail-Request on behalf of River District Business K3' ---,- i I -a -�_- •�5 a k 5e•
Alliance o o \� 2320 s t o I - • ,
ti ~ Parkway Ave I i I I m • South Salt ,'°Ut - 9 pit% ' .
® SLC Foothills Trail System Plan-Trailhead Improvements I 1' ill I Lake e `�r��. TheCountryl -
Phase I(Design Phase) _ Parkway Blvd, __ _ '' I }: zzoo s rzo S �`�`� , s
11 t- I - A in Ave
® 1200 East Median,Raise Curb,new irrigation,new tree / o` �� A
_ Last update:a few seconds ago z °1 4 l reek_I_ _
List 1 Details i 3100 S ,- a\\ u i ry Esri, ASA,NGA,USGS,FEMA Coun Hof Salt Lake,Utah AGRC,Esri,HERE...
Central Vallevi\ I re
CIP by Council District : 2023 Funding Requests & 2020-2022 Allocations
$35,000,000
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
Council 2023 Funding Request 2020- 2022 Allocations
District
$20,000,000 1 $7,908,605 11% $1,781,782 3%
2 $25,011,594 34% $13,221,282 20%
$15,000,000 3 $4,933,328 7% $3,031,212 5%
4 $10,907,875 15% $6,562,811 10%
5 $2,864,026 4% $2,612,893 4%
$10,000,000 6 $1,842,636 3% $1,507,830 2%
7 $5,666,873 8% $3,382,983 5%
Multi-district $1,998,602 3% $1,252,230 2%
$5,000,000 Citywide $ 11,827,952 16% $33,094,335 50%
' , ' . Total $72,961,491 100% $66,447,358 100%
$0
ti ti 3 (0 1 �•a .\c.
aate
C
• 2023 Funding Request • 2020 - 2022 Allocations
2023 Funding Request 2020 - 2022 Allocations
$72,961,491 $66,447,358
29% 28% 31% 24%
13% I 10%
30% 35%
Alinim
Engineering • Transportation • Facilities Public Lands
Type 2023 Funding Request 2020 - 2022 Allocations
Engineering $20,455,166 28% $15,661,608 24%
Transportation $21,735,965 30% $23,269,678 35%
Facilities $9,610,473 13% $6,558,672 10%
Public Lands $21,159,887 29% $20,957,400 32%
otal $72,961,491 100% $66,447,358 100%
2023 Constituent Applications :
Funding Request & Number of Applications by Council District
$6,000,000 9
$5,000,000
$4,000,000 Council
2023 Constituent Request # of Applications
District
1 $1,564,227 9% 3
$3,000,000 2 $5,260,291 30% 9
6 3 $1,760,565 10%
4 ill5 6 4 4
3 4 $675,294 4% 4
$2,000,000 5
$2,273,866 13% 6
6 $1,842,636 11% 5
$1 000 000 4I 7 $1,916,873 11% 6
Multi-District $1,998,602 12% 4
otal $17,292,35A 100% 41
$0
ti ti 0, 0, 1 •\`�
2023 Constituent Applications :
Funding Request by Type of Project
$3,836,166
$7,920,223
III
$5,535,965 Type 2023 Constituent #of
Request Applications
Engineering $3,836,166 22% 9
Transportation $5,535,965 32% 13
Facilities $0 0% 0
Public Lands $7,920,223 46% 19
Total $17,292,354 100% 41
$'
• Engineering Transportation • Facilities Public Lands
FY23 CIP Map
Link to map for FY23 CIP projects :
https://maps.slcgov.com/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a3290cc6185e4c3985296cc3dfdb4c3e
I
1 Farmington vL7 lily Cree '! `�•I 1,4 `
j^ Bay • r, �- _ r (, '
.
_tv
•
_ l
n
1S olldntod a,
Salt Lake City _
Intl Airport * [ii 1
• — • 0 Little
W WB F • Iiio• 00IP 7y0 Dell
VV. .�`S. mi9S a1100 C Reservoir
r E
DoCLI s • Salt Lake thy
R ter• 'o,s N• • r PlaceD enThi rage
3 •rI _ Paf\eys Canyon
J
* Aits, . 1Ml f
e �y
rPot eV`', O�
r. _ �� ` iif mttlAire �,
South S It //12011 Lak The C*t / j.1,, .it
CI4,0 a !. ��t 419-
Park,/ .1
Stonebridge C?eek ` ,)
ay[: /
Golf Course 1 itti ill` irOk
4i 1711 3300 T'
1 "
< 4-- .et -
. ..
. .,_„, , 1
L E , , _ .
.,
h _ ........„ .....„.
Feb 7 5:30 to 7:30 pm Welcome & Overview
Feb 16 5:30 to 7:30 pm Constituent and Internal Engineering/Facilities/Fire Apps
Feb 28 5:30 to 7:30 pm Constituent Transportation Apps
Mar 7 5:30 to 7:30 pm Internal Transportation Apps ,,.
Mar 14 5:30 to 7:30 pm Constituent Parks & Public Lands Apps
Mar 21 5:30 to 7:30 pm Internal Parks & Public Lands Apps
Mar 28 5:30 to 7:30 pm TBD/Initial Recommendations
April 4 5:30 to 7:30 pm Final Recommendations
CCCIP Minutes 02.07.2022
Final Audit Report 2022-03-03
Created: 2022-03-01
By: Rachel Molinari(rachel.molinari@slcgov.com)
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAeXQdwl0mk6KYDhtGIVFgBmpSilJhMp_K
"CCCIP Minutes 02.07.2022" History
Document created by Rachel Molinari (rachel.molinari@slcgov.com)
2022-03-01 -2:11:26 AM GMT
Document emailed to Brooke Young (broyou@gmail.com)for signature
2022-03-01 -2:12:05 AM GMT
,t Email viewed by Brooke Young (broyou@gmail.com)
2022-03-03-11:20:26 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Brooke Young (broyou@gmail.com)
Signature Date:2022-03-03-11:20:45 PM GMT-Time Source:server
O Agreement completed.
2022-03-03-11:20:45 PM GMT
ilk Adobe Sign
.•r