08/08/2023 - Work Session - Meeting MaterialsSALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
WORK SESSION
August 8, 2023 Tuesday 4:00 PM
Council meetings are held in a hybrid meeting format. Hybrid meetings allow people to join online or in
person at the City & County Building. Learn more at www.slc.gov/council/agendas.
Council Work Room
451 South State Street, Room 326
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
SLCCouncil.com
4:00 PM Work Session
Or immediately following the 2:00 PM
Redevelopment Agency Meeting
7:00 pm Formal Meeting
Room 326
(See separate agenda)
Welcome and public meeting rules
In accordance with State Statute and City Ordinance, the meeting may be held electronically. After 5:00 p.m., please enter the
City & County Building through the main east entrance.
The Work Session is a discussion among Council Members and select presenters. The public is welcome to listen. Items
scheduled on the Work Session or Formal Meeting may be moved and / or discussed during a different portion of the Meeting
based on circumstance or availability of speakers.
The Website addresses listed on the agenda may not be available after the Council votes on the item. Not all agenda items will
have a webpage for additional information read associated agenda paperwork.
Generated: 12:26:53
Note: Dates not identified in the project timeline are either not applicable or not yet determined. Item start
times and durations are approximate and are subject to change.
Work Session Items
1.Informational: Updates from the Administration ~ 4:00 p.m.
15 min.
The Council will receive information from the Administration on major items or projects
in progress. Topics may relate to major events or emergencies (if needed), services and
resources related to people experiencing homelessness, active public engagement efforts,
and projects or staffing updates from City Departments, or other items as appropriate.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
2.Informational: Equity Update ~ 4:15 p.m.
20 min.
The Council will hold a discussion about various initiatives led by the City's Office of
Equity and Inclusion. These initiatives include, but are not limited to, improving racial
equity and justice in policing. Discussion may also include updates on the City's other
work to achieve equitable service delivery, decision-making, and community engagement
through the Citywide Equity Plan, increased ADA resources, language access, and other
topics addressed in the ongoing work of the Human Rights Commission and the Racial
Equity in Policing Commission.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Recurring Briefing
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - n/a
3.Resolution: Capital Improvement Program Projects Follow-
up ~ 4:35 p.m.
60 min
The Council will receive a follow-up briefing about the City's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP), which involves the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings,
parks, streets or other City-owned physical structures. Generally, projects have a useful
life of at least five years and cost $50,000 or more. The Council approves debt service
and overall CIP funding in the annual budget process, while project-specific funding is
approved by September 1 of the same calendar year.
For more information on this item visit https://tinyurl.com/SLCFY24CIP.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, June 6, 2023; Tuesday, July 11, 2023; Tuesday, July 18, 2023; and
Tuesday, August 8, 2023
Set Public Hearing Date - Tuesday, June 13, 2023
Hold hearing to accept public comment - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 and Tuesday, August 8,
2023 at 7 p.m.
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023
4.Ordinance: Economic Development Revolving Loan
Fund – Leavity LLC Written Briefing
-
The Council will receive a written briefing about an ordinance that would approve a
$100,000 loan for Leavity, LLC., at 47 South Orange Street, #B1, from the Economic
Development Loan Fund (EDLF). Leavity LLC., is a wholesale sourdough bread bakery.
This loan will assist in the creation of one new job in the next year and the retention of
one current job.
FYI – Project Timeline: (subject to change per Chair direction or Council discussion)
Briefing - Tuesday, August 8, 2023
Set Public Hearing Date - n/a
Hold hearing to accept public comment - n/a
TENTATIVE Council Action - Tuesday, August 15, 2023
Standing Items
5.Report of the Chair and Vice Chair
Report of Chair and Vice Chair.
6.Report and Announcements from the Executive Director -
-
Report of the Executive Director, including a review of Council information items and
announcements. The Council may give feedback or staff direction on any item related to
City Council business, including but not limited to scheduling items.
7.Tentative Closed Session -
-
The Council will consider a motion to enter into Closed Session. A closed meeting described
under Section 52-4-205 may be held for specific purposes including, but not limited to:
a. discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health
of an individual;
b. strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
c. strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
d. strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property,
including any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the
transaction would:
(i) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(ii) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
e. strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water
right or water shares, if:
(i) public discussion of the transaction would:
(A) disclose the appraisal or estimated value of the property under
consideration; or
(B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction on the best
possible terms;
(ii) the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and
(iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body
approves the sale;
f. discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
g. investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A closed meeting may also be held for attorney-client matters that are privileged pursuant to
Utah Code § 78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements
of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
On or before 2:00 p.m. on Friday, August 4, 2023, the undersigned, duly appointed City Recorder,
does hereby certify that the above notice and agenda was (1) posted on the Utah Public Notice
Website created under Utah Code Section 63F-1-701, and (2) a copy of the foregoing provided to The
Salt Lake Tribune and/or the Deseret News and to a local media correspondent and any others who
have indicated interest.
CINDY LOU TRISHMAN
SALT LAKE CITY RECORDER
Final action may be taken in relation to any topic listed on the agenda, including but
not limited to adoption, rejection, amendment, addition of conditions and variations
of options discussed.
The City & County Building is an accessible facility. People with disabilities may make requests for
reasonable accommodation, which may include alternate formats, interpreters, and other auxiliary
aids and services. Please make requests at least two business days in advance. To make a request,
please contact the City Council Office at council.comments@slcgov.com, 801-535-7600, or relay
service 711.
Administrative
Updates
August 8, 2023
www.slc.gov/feedback/
Regularly updated with highlighted
ways to engage with the City.
Community Engagement Highlights
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canPlanningSlc.gov/planning
www.slc.gov/feedback/
•Adaptive Reuse Ordinance
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canPublic Lands slc.gov/parks/
www.slc.gov/feedback/
•North Temple Boulevard: Madsen Park (D2)
•Planning Commission August 9th
•Glendale Regional Park Master Plan (D2)
•Pickleball Plan
•Liberty Park Playground (D5)
•Draw your ideal playground
•Making the Emerald Ribbon (D1/2)
•Focus Group
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canArts Council saltlakearts.org
West Side Art Project
www.slc.gov/feedback/
•Iconic Public artwork on the West Side
of the City
•Engagement continues
•Partners in the Park
•Mestizo Arts and Activism
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canBallpark NEXT / RDA Ballparknext.com
Planning slc.gov/planning
Thriving in PlaceMayor’s Office
Location Date Time
Sweetaly Gelato Aug. 7 4pm – 6pm
Rancho Market in Fairpark Aug. 14 5pm – 7pm
Roots Coffee Aug. 15 10:30am – 12:30pm
Northwest Rec Center Aug. 15 2pm – 4:30pm
Sugar House Rocks Aug. 18 6pm – 9pm
Kensington Street Festival Aug. 19 2pm – 8pm
August Community Office Hours
Community & Neighborhoods slc.gov/canAugust Events
These events are a collection of City Sponsored, ACE, and publicly permitted events.
Event Date Location
East Bench Ice Cream Social 7/19 Donner Trail Park – East Side
Main Street (Alleyways Amplified Fashion Show)7/21 Eccles Theater Lobby
Summer Film Series at Liberty Park -- Blueback 7/21 Liberty Park
Sugar House Rocks Concert Series 7/21 Monument Plaza in Sugar House
Sabores de Mi Patria/Flavors of My Homeland Workshop Series 7/21 Wasatch Community Garden's Campus
Downtown Farmers Market 7/22 Pioneer Park
Feria Ambiental:Para celebrar la semana de conservacion Latina (Latino Conservation Week Fair)7/22 Three Creeks Confluence
The Cookout '23 7/23 Fairmont Park
Drone Show 7/24 Liberty Park
Partners in the Park 7/25 Riverside Park
Summer Film Series at Liberty Park – Fire of Love 7/28 Liberty Park
Second Annual Community on the Green 7/28 Forest Dale Golf Course
Downtown Farmers Market 7/29 Pioneer Park
African Festival 7/29 Liberty Park
Back-to-School Fair: The Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake City 7/29 The Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake
Homeless Resource Center Utilization
•July 10th -14th HRCs:98.5%
Rapid Intervention/ EIM
•EIM- Liberty Park + additional support
•64 HEART-tracked camps
•RIT locations:
o VOA Outreach Engagement: 7
o RIT Site Rehabilitations: 8 (+15)
Resource Fair:
•Friday Aug 11 - Library Square 9:30 -
12:30
Kayak Court
-Friday August 18th - Jordan River
Homelessness
Update
Additional System Information:
Salt Lake Valley Coalition to
End Homelessness (SLVCEH)
endutahhomelessness.org/
salt-lake-valley
Utah Office of Homeless
Services (OHS)
jobs.utah.gov/homelessness/
index.html
State of Utah 5 Yr Homelessness Strategic
Plan:
https://jobs.utah.gov/homelessness/homel
essnessstrategicplan.pdf
Salt Lake Valley Coalition to End Homelessness
(SLVCEH)Strategic Plan:
Draft under review by Steering Committee
Salt Lake Valley '23-24 Winter Services Plan
Utah Homeless Council Review + Vote
Thursday Aug 10th 12:30 -3:30
Outdoor Resource Center (Sanctioned Camp
Pilot)
Internal City Planning +Coordination with
State OHS
Homelessness
Update
Strategic Planning +
Winter Services
Update
WELCOMING WEEK
•SLC has been participating least since 2016.
•Partnering with Salt Lake County Office of New Americas to plan and promote events in
communities across the county.
•An official calendar of all the events will be shared on the SLCGov website.
•Save the date for Welcoming Walk and Tree Planting and Dedication scheduled for Sept.
14 from 12 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. in Washington Square.
•The SLC Arts Council will also have a show that will be part of the celebration.
•Working with Salt Lake County to host a public safety event with the Afghan community.
THANK YOU!
QUESTIONS?
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY24CIP
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Budget & Policy Analyst
DATE:August 8, 2023
RE:FY2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
ANNUAL BUDGET BOOK: Pages 67-68 and 143 – 154
CIP BUDGET BOOK PAGES:
- 5-12 shows a summary table of proposed projects and funding sources
- 13-15 lists CIP projects not recommended for funding
- 19-23 identify existing bonds paid from CIP (does not include General Obligation bonds)
and other ongoing obligations
- 27-53 has project specific pages for the recommended General Fund CIP projects
- 57-108 has project specific pages for enterprise fund capital projects (Airport, Golf, and Public Utilities)
NEW INFORMATION
In this section, first is a potential funding scenario for the Council’s seven identified priority projects discussed
at the last briefing. The Council could consider other funding scenarios. Then responses to Council Member
questions about specific projects are listed in the same order as the projects’ on the funding log. The Council is
scheduled to vote on project specific funding at the August 15 meeting.
Potential Funding Scenario for Council-identified Priority Projects:
At the last briefing, Council Members identified seven priority projects for potential funding from the $614,689
of General Fund dollars and the $644,126 of Funding Our Future dollars that were added to CIP above the
Mayor’s recommended budget. The table below lists the seven projects and potential funding allocations from
the two funding sources. This scenario provides funding to all seven projects. Note the Livable Streets traffic
calming program was recommended for partial funding by the board and Mayor while the other six projects
were not recommended for any funding. The scenario has no funding shifts away from projects recommended by
the board and Mayor, and it does not require adding more funding into CIP in a later budget amendment.
Project Timeline:
Budget Hearings: May 16 & June 6, 2023
1st Briefing: June 6, 2023
2nd Briefing: July 11, 2023
3rd Briefing & Public Hearing: July 18, 2023
4th Briefing & Public Hearing: August 8, 2023
Potential Action: August 15, 2023
Note: The Council approves debt service and
overall CIP funding in the annual budget. Project
specific funding is approved by September 1.
Page | 2
- Combining CIP and Bond Funding – Projects #22 Richmond Park Playground and #27 North Temple
Arts and Tourism District Improvements would be partially funded from CIP and combined with
funding from the Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond.
- Dividing Projects into Phases – Projects #21 Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety
Improvements and #46 Safety Enhancements to Westside of Foothill Drive would be partially funded
and remaining phases could apply for funding in the next CIP cycle.
o Project #27 North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements is scalable to fit within the
available budget. It does not have specific amenities or locations identified or designed yet. The
Council could consider funding $69,111 for public engagement, designs, and cost estimates. This
would free up $123,578 that could go to another project. The construction funding could come
from the Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond and/or from a future CIP cycle.
- Fully Funded from CIP – Projects #32 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 and #57 Ensign Peak Nature
Park Improvements would be fully funded.
- Project #7 Livable Streets traffic calming program would have a new total of over $1.6 million from two
funding sources. The program is scalable based on available budget and was used as the balancing line
item receiving remaining funds after funding the other projects.
o The Transportation Division stated each zone in the program costs $250,000 - $500,000. The
additional funding would be enough to address traffic calming needs for a small or medium-
sized zone.
Project General Fund Funding Our Future
#7 Livable Streets Program
(New total would be $1,644,126)$294,126
#21 Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety
Improvements
(For two driver feedback signs)
$30,000
#22 Richmond Park Playground
(Combine with Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond
funding for District Four reimagine neighborhood
parks)
$212,000
#27 North Temple Arts and Tourism District
Improvements
(Combine with Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond
funds for Folsom Trail)
$192,689
#32 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2
(Fully funds the second phase)$150,000
#46 Safety Enhancements to Westside of Foothill
Drive
(For Blaine Ave and 2500 East)
$170,000
#57 Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements
(Fully funds the request)$210,000
TOTALS $614,689 $644,126
Page | 3
Project #2 Safer Crossings: Main Street, 1700 South Glendale Park, and Citywide TBD
Recommended for full funding of $900,000
The Council asked is a cost breakout available for the individual crossing improvements? The project is split into
three parts:
- $500,000 for five crossings on Main Street. The per crossing cost estimate is $60,000 - $100,000 per
crossing. This funding would be combined with $500,000 remaining from a FY2021 CIP allocation for
corridor transformations.
- $100,000 for a HAWK signal across 1700 South at the future Glendale Park. This funding would be
combined with remaining funds from FY2023 CIP for 1700 South. The price of a HAWK signal doubled
in the past year to $350,000.
- $300,000 for TBD crossings citywide. The Transportation Division maintains a priority list of crossings
for improvements pending available budget. Prioritization factors include vehicle and pedestrian counts,
speed limits and actual speed data, roadway lane configuration and width, and crashes, injuries, and
fatalities.
o For the citywide funds, Council Member Petro suggested 300 North to 600 North on 1200 West
are high need areas in District 1 particularly for seniors walking to the Smiths grocery store.
o Councilmember Puy suggested an enhancement to the crosswalk at 900 West and Fayette Ave,
which would cost about $150k.
Project #4 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes
Recommended for partial funding of $1.1 million ($400,000 less than requested)
The Council asked what could be accomplished with an additional $400,000 to meet the $1.5 million requested
funding level? The additional funding could be used for two purposes:
- Continuing to improve bus stops at the current level which is more expensive because of inflation. The
Council approved $1.1 million for this program annually in CIP from FY2018 – FY2021 and in FY2023.
No funding was awarded in FY2022.
- Be held in a capital account for anticipated use as local matching funds for grants to construct a North
Temple Westside Transit Hub. The Transportation Division reports that the total estimated cost for the
transit hub is $10 million - $15 million. The Utah Transit Authority secured $1.4 million for the project
which is expected to be available in 2025 or later, and the City secured $2,116,407 in a Wasatch Front
Regional Council grant expected to be available in 2026 or later.
Policy Question:
➢The Council may wish to ask the Administration for more information about the North Temple
Westside Transit Hub plans and consider a briefing to provide policy guidance on the major project.
Project #5 Complete Streets Program
Recommended for partial funding of $3.3 million (half of the $6.6 million requested)
The Council asked what is the impact of the recommended funding level being $3.307 million less than the $6.6
million requested? The recommended funding level would likely result in the 2100 South reconstruction project
being prioritized because of the Streets Reconstruction Bond spending deadlines, earlier construction timeline,
and larger total cost. The next project to be prioritized is reconstruction of Virginia Street which is also receiving
funding from the bond but has a later construction schedule.
Project #6 Public Way Concrete Program
Recommended for full funding of $750,000
See Attachment 10 for tables and graphs summarizing the 50/50 concrete program utilization
Note that the 50/50 concrete program where a residential property owner and the City equally share
replacement costs is separate from the proactive Public Way Concrete Program. Commercially properties are
responsible for the full cost of replacement. The Council asked could the 50/50 cost sharing concrete
replacement program use an income-based sliding scale approach? The Public Services Department stated that
City Code sections 14.32.300 – 345 which govern the program does not include a sliding scale and welcomes a
policy discussion for potential changes.
Page | 4
The Council also asked what data exists about the program utilization? The program is run on a first-come first-
served basis. The available budget is spent each construction season completing about 130 individual projects.
The Department provided Attachment 10 which shows a breakout of projects by Council district, whether the
project was residential or commercial, and the total funding from 2020 to the present.
Policy Question:
➢The Council may wish to request a briefing about the City’s approaches for public right of way
concrete repair and replacement to provide policy guidance on potential changes such as an income-
based sliding scale and the available funding for the different programs.
Project #27 North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements
Not recommended for funding ($495,111 requested)
The Council requested info about the specific improvements proposed and a cost breakout. The project area is
both sides of 800 West and the center green median from North Temple to the dead-end street at approximately
150 South (cutoff by Interstate-15). This project could be considered like the green medians along 500 West
downtown that function as a linear park and the larger downtown green loop concept.
The project application identified five categories of potential improvements. Specific cost estimates are
unavailable because locations and types of improvements are to be determined. The Administration provided
cost ranges for the five categories as follows. The Council could consider funding $69,111 for public engagement,
designs, and cost estimates as phase 1 of this project, and phase 2 would return in a future CIP cycle requesting
construction of specifically identified improvements.
- Pedestrian safety improvements such as $40,000 - $220,000 for raised crosswalks or $40,000 -
$120,000 for rapid flashing beacons.
- Sidewalk upgrades to meet ADA requirements pending an engineering site survey to determine existing
conditions and cost estimates for potential improvements.
- Enhanced lighting described as “pedestrian-scale” or “decorative lighting” estimated to cost $185,000
(one side of the street only) to $365,000 for both sides. Installation on the center median may add cost
to add electrical connections to the medians.
- Park like amenities such as $2,000 - $5,000 for benches, $700 - $1,000 for bike racks, and $45,000
$100,000 for kids play feature (less than a full playground) which might be partially eligible for parks
impact fees. The Department noted these amenities are easily scalable based on the available budget.
-Public artworks from $20,000 for small scale murals to $120,000 for large scale sculptures
Potential to Combine CIP and Parks Bond Funding
The CIP project area partially overlaps with the Folsom Trail at the intersection of 800 West. The first issuance
of the Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond includes $5 million to complete the Folsom Trail west of 1000 West and
to add amenities to the trail east of 1000 West. Some of the proposed amenities and improvements in the CIP
project also appear eligible for this bond funding. The Council could consider partially funding the CIP project
and request the Administration evaluate how to combine with the bond funding.
Project #32 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2
Not recommended for funding ($150,000 requested)
The Council asked whether the temporary traffic calming features currently in place could stay over the winter
and/or be added back in the spring. The Transportation Division responded that the temporary traffic calming
features could be restored in the spring. They are checking with the Streets Division about potentially leaving
some or all features over the winter pending evaluation of compatibility with the need for snow removal (plows).
Project #35 Replacement of 75-Year-Old Traffic Signal
Recommended for full funding of $400,000
The Council asked for details about which traffic signals are 75 years old or more. The Transportation Division
provided the below summary table showing the six oldest traffic signals in the City. The requested funding this
CIP cycle is to replace the traffic signal at 1300 East and 100 South. The signal at 900 West and 200 South is still
operational and per the Division “is most likely to become a nonagenarian.”
Page | 5
LOCATION AGE CONDITION REPLACEMENT STATUS
West Temple 200 South 88 Poles rotting Part of 200 South Reconstruction Project
Highland Dr. 2700 South 88 Wooden Pole In design, construction is funded
900 West 200 South 87 Direct bury poles ~400k funding needed
1300 East 200 South 75 Direct bury poles ~400k funding needed
1300 East 300 South 75 Direct bury poles ~400k funding needed
1300 East 100 South 75 Direct bury poles,
Emergency route
Requested funding, per this FY24 application
Reuse of Traffic Calming and Control Equipment
The Council asked what happens to these types of equipment once it’s no longer needed at a location such as
being replaced with an upgraded version or displaced by construction or development? The Transportation
Division responded that “Used equipment removed by upgrades or development is first evaluated to see if it’s
reusable and in satisfactory condition. If so, it’s sent to [the] Streets [Division] to be stored for future use as part
of maintenance activities. Because equipment standards are constantly being updated, new installations are
built using new equipment that meets current standards. Used signal equipment would rarely be suitable for use
in new construction but may be used to maintain existing signals.”
Project #38 First Encampment Park
Not recommended for funding ($125,500 requested)
The Council asked what existing funding sources are available to meet the maintenance needs at the Park? The
maintenance expenses are ineligible for parks impact fees and bond funding. The Public Lands Department
stated that many of the maintenance expenses could be handled by existing maintenance teams internally.
$56,000 of General Fund CIP dollars were identified for a phase one small asset replacement project including
irrigation replacement, plantings, and design. Additional potential funding sources are remaining one-time
funds from the Funding Our Future $2 million for parks maintenance approved in FY2023 CIP or remaining
ongoing base funding for parks maintenance approved annually prior to FY2023 CIP. When reviewing CIP
accounts as part of the annual budget, there was over $1.1 million remaining from the $2 million appropriation
last year, and over $200,000 remaining from the ongoing base funding.
Project #40 Multimodal Capital Maintenance
Not recommended for funding ($200,000 requested)
The Council asked what could be accomplished if this request was partially or fully funded? The Transportation
Division responded that the “public could see fewer bike racks downtown when existing bike racks are damaged
(primarily in car crashes) or in need of replacement; damaged delineators or missing delineators along bicycle
routes and/or pedestrian corridors; and faded, damaged, or missing pavement markings along bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.”
Moving this Ongoing Maintenance Expense into Public Services’ Base Budget
The Council discussed a preference to move this ongoing $200,000 maintenance need into the Transportation
Division’s or Public Services Department’s base budgets. The two are collaborating on an inventory and
assessment of the assets. This will be used to inform an analysis of whether bringing these functions in-house
would be more cost efficient than relying upon outside contractors. Adding this maintenance into a department’s
budget may require one-time equipment purchases, ongoing supplies funding, and new full-time employees. The
analysis would determine whether there are long-term savings from an in-house approach and could be
considered in the next annual budget.
Project #55 1200 East Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk
Not recommended for funding ($351,000 requested)
The Council asked would this project reduce the available street parking on the block, and is it correct that
adding the project to a street reconstruction would be more efficient? The Administration responded that the
one-block segment is not currently scheduled for a street reconstruction. Adding these types of improvements to
a full street reconstruction project would be more cost effective in terms of savings from a single project
mobilization instead of doing it twice and less disruption to the neighborhood. Impacts to on-street parking are
identified for all street projects during early design phases and included in public outreach and engagement to
potentially impacted residents, businesses, and property owners.
Page | 6
Updated Attachment 8 Regular CIP Projects Cost Estimates
The departments with common CIP projects provided updated cost estimates based on recent construction
projects and actual bids. The attachment includes cost estimates back to 2019 which shows the impacts of
inflation and supply chain constraints on the City’s construction budgets.
Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings
The Council added a total of $1,258,815 to the FY2024 CIP budget above the Mayor’s Recommended Budget.
This funding is from two sources: $644,126 Funding Our Future limited to the five critical need areas, and
$614,689 recaptured from capital projects older than three years which are basically General Fund dollars
available to any CIP project. As a reminder, the five Funding Our Future categories are: improved street
conditions (sidewalk-to-sidewalk), greater housing opportunities, better public transit services, public safety
(fire, police, social workers, and 911 dispatch), and parks maintenance.
Projects of Council Member Interest Not Recommended for Funding by Advisory Board & Mayor
The total cost to fully fund the four projects listed below is $2,214,126. Of this amount, $496,412 could come
from impact fees which is itemized by project below. The Council could fund these projects by adding funding to
CIP above the Mayor’s Recommended Budget and/or shifting funding from projects that are recommended for
funding. Projects are listed in district numerical order and updated since the first briefing.
Council Member Petro: Project #21 is $830,000 for Rose Park Lane Landscaping, Trail Rebuild, and Safety
-$235,000 is eligible for parks impact fees (second phase listed below)
-Council Member Petro expressed interest in only funding the $30,000 for two solar feedback speed limit
signs pending available funding
-The project could be partially funded in two or three phases:
o $565,000 for the trail reconstruction as the first phase
o $235,000 for irrigation and tree planting as the second phase
o $30,000 for two solar feedback speed limit signs which could be done independently from the
other two phases (at any time)
Council Member Wharton: Project #57 requesting $210,000 for Ensign Peak Nature Park Access and Security
Improvements
-The project would install new lighting, an access gate and fence at the popular trailhead, and landscaping
around the entrance
-The nature park has experienced on and off nuisance (traffic, noise, littering, trespassing) and criminal
activity (fires, public intoxication, firearm discharges) for several years particularly late at night
-The project appears ineligible for parks impact fees
Council Member Valdemoros: Project #22 requesting $530,000 for Richmond Park Playground
-$212,000 is eligible from park impact fees
-Richmond Park is also identified as a neighborhood park to be reimagined with funding from the Parks,
Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bond
Council Member Dugan: Project #46 requesting $494,126 for Westside of Foothill Drive Safety Enhancements
-The project is 10% eligible for transportation impact fees which is $49,412
-The project is from the 2017 Foothill Drive Implementation Strategy but this was not brought to the
Council for adoption
-The project could be split into phases which would increase the total cost. Individual cost estimates by
intersections and potential phase are:
o Phase 1:
▪2600 East / Foothill Drive: $110,000
▪Westminster / Foothill Drive: $20,000
▪Laurelhurst / Foothill Drive: $85,000
o Phase 2:
▪Blaine + 2500 E / Foothill Drive: $170,000
▪Bryan / Foothill Drive: $110,000
Council Member Fowler: Project #32 requesting $150,000 for Sugar House Safe Side Streets Phase 2
Page | 7
-Phase 1 received $153,221 in FY2022 CIP for studying, testing, public engagement, and designs of traffic
calming improvements on six local streets: Hollywood Avenue, Ramona Avenue, Garfield Avenue,
Lincoln Street, 1000 East, and McClelland Street
-An application was submitted in the FY2023 CIP cycle for Phase 2 but did not receive additional funding
-The FY2024 CIP application is requesting funds that would be combined with remaining funds from
Phase 1 to complete the traffic calming improvements recommended in the Phase 1 traffic study
Project #1 Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning
Council staff asked the Administration how does the proposed Library Plaza structural assessment and visioning
project relate to the already funded 200 East Green Loop designs and study, the Washington Square Master
Plan, and the several studies already done about the plaza (2002 Library Square Block Plan, 2017 Evaluating
Library Square Urban Land Institute Report, 2018 GSBS Architects Library Square Study, and others)? The
Administration’s response is copied below for reference.
“This March, a planning and design consultant, Wenk Associates, was hired by the inter-departmental City team
to work on studying the Green Loop, including more detailed planning and schematic (preliminary) design for
the 200 East leg (South Temple to 900 South). Assessing land uses, utilities, transportation, demographics,
future development, and other information will help the City understand the possibilities for a drastically
different design for the street, including more green space and necessary utilities. This also considers the
impacts and feasibility of a “festival street” between 400 South and 500 South. Final documents will form the
basis of federal grant applications that the City will submit in April 2024. The Green Loop project will target the
Right of Way, as opposed to the Library Plaza CIP application which includes the public space within the block.
The submitted CIP application for this funding cycle is intended to provide a vision, plan and conceptual design
for Library Plaza ($125,000 of a larger $190,000 Library Plaza application). If funded, this process will identify
solutions and designs for activating the plaza and revitalizing the space as a site for large public events, as
originally intended. Solutions will mitigate barriers to access and enjoyment, including direct sunlight, lack of
shade, urban heat island effect, and protection from the elements. With Salt Lake City being a potential
candidate for the 2030 or 2034 Olympics, reimagining and retrofitting this space will be critical if Library Plaza
and adjacent civic sites are intended to be used to host significant events and accommodate additional capacity.
It is critical that these studies, plans, and schematic designs of 200 East and Library Plaza be completed before
the City can confidently understand the need for and costs of additional design and construction of these sites.”
Policy Question:
➢The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether the City’s policy goal is to advance
the concept of a Civic Campus by further connecting the two sides of 200 East between 400 S and 500
S (Washington Square and Library Plaza). Previous Councils discussed and funded studies to look at
changing this one-block section of 200 East to facilitate public events and the Civic Campus concept.
Project #60 Maintenance of City-owned Property
The Council approved $700,000 for this use in the last annual budget of which $598,685 remains available.
Another $700,000 was requested of which $200,000 (the base ongoing funding) was approved as part of the
annual budget adoption on June 13. The Administration provided the following list of five projects with high-
level cost estimates (FY2023 remaining funds and FY2024 requested funds). The Public Services Department is
conducting a facility assessment which may recommend projects to use these funds.
Policy Question:
➢The Council may wish to discuss with the Administration whether some of the $500,000 requested
in FY2024 could be used for other CIP projects since the FY2023 remaining appropriation of
$598,685 is enough to cover the cost estimates of the five items listed below.
$100,000 at the Former Public Safety Building (PSB):
(Note this building is also called the Northwest Pipeline Building at 315 E 200 S)
The Administration is planning projects that will improve the safety and security of the building and
surrounding property while the property is being prepared for redevelopment. These improvements include
repair to an existing gate, a new motorized gate to access Magnolia parking, improvements to the park strip,
ongoing landscape maintenance and cleanup (including biowaste cleanup), and car towing and disposal. These
expenses are anticipated to cost up to $100,000.
$200,000 for a Development Strategy and Spacing Needs Study:
Page | 8
(Note the Council may consider this item as a separate project since the scope is beyond maintenance of city-
owned property)
The Administration would like to utilize a portion of these funds to issue an RFP for a consultant to develop a
Disposition and Development Strategy for a suite of City-owned parcels, with the intent of planning for future
space needs, identifying surplus property for future municipal purposes, and identifying property for revenue
generation. This effort, anticipated to be as much as $200,000, is somewhat outside of the scope of the approved
use of funding and may require a scope adjustment.
$100,000+ additional Funding for Major Renovations to the Annex building Leased by Odyssey House:
This project was awarded $500,000 in CIP funding for structural repairs. Public Services is working on a site
assessment in order to identify improvements and develop bids. Based on the condition of the building, it is
believed that the necessary improvements may require an additional $100,000+ to bring the building up to
health, safety, and welfare standards. Odyssey House has abandoned operations in one section of the building
due to safety issues and is still operating its programming in the other section on a limited basis.
$100,000 for Maintenance of City-owned Buildings Leased to Third Parties:
The Administration would like to utilize a portion of the funding for maintenance of not only vacant city-owned
property but for property that is leased to a third-party (vacant from city municipal function). Projects include
replacement of a disintegrating fence at the Salt Lake Acting Company building, anticipated to be up to $15,000.
In addition, improvements are needed to the Memorial House building that are the responsibility of the City
pursuant to the lease, including items such as HVAC replacement, repair of windows and doors, repair of water
damage, etc. These repairs could cost up to $75,000.
$50,0000 for Pre-development Work at the Fleet Block and former Public Safety Building (PSB):
The Administration is planning to use up to $50,000 to prepare Fleet Block and the former PSB for
redevelopment. Funds will be used for surveys, title work, appraisals, subdivision of property, etc.
Project #61 Urban Trails Maintenance
(Note this is proposed to be a new ongoing annual maintenance line item)
The Administration provided the following description of this new line item. “These funds will be used for
repaving, crack and seal repair, bridge re-decking, bridge replacements, trail shoulder surfacing, snow removal,
debris removal on urban paved trails. Project locations include the Jordan River Parkway, 9Line Trail, Folsom
Trail. Short description: These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain
urban trails and trail segments that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The maintenance of these
trails is necessary to keep them safe for all that use them and so they can be used year-round.”
Surplus Land Fund Updated Balance
During the review of capital accounts older than three years, the Finance Department identified a few old
property management accounts with land sale proceeds that should have been returned to the Surplus Land
Fund because that was the original source for the unused funds. The Surplus Land Funds new balance is
$5,128,676 after these proceeds are transferred.
CIP Debt Load Projections through FY2027
The Administration provided the following chart to illustrate the ratio of ongoing commitments to available
funding through FY2027. Pay as you go projects reflect new capital projects. The chart shows relatively stable
debt load projections using approximately 55% of the annual General Fund transfer to CIP. An important caveat
to note is the chart assumes 9% of ongoing General Fund revenues are transferred into CIP annually. The
FY2023 budget hit the 9% transfer goal but the City has typically been closer to 7% over the past 15 years. The
FY2024 budget transferred 7.1% of ongoing General Fund revenues into CIP (after including the Council’s $1.2
million above the Mayor’s Recommended Budget) which means less funding is available to go to new projects.
Most of these commitments are debt payments on existing bonds. Other commitments include, ESCO debt
payments, the Crime Lab lease, capital replacement funding for parks and facilities, contributions to the CIP cost
overrun account and the 1.5% for art fund. The CIP Budget Book includes an overview and details on each of the
ongoing commitments. Note that General Obligation (G.O.) bonds are not paid from CIP because they are
funded through a separate, dedicated voter-approved property tax increase.
Page | 9
Information below was provided to the Council at earlier briefings
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
Each year, the Council appropriates overall funding available for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and
approves debt payments and ongoing obligations as part of the annual budget in June. Over the summer, the
Council reviews individual projects and per state law must approve project specific funding by September 1. CIP
is an open and competitive process where residents, local organizations, and City departments submit project
applications. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program (CDCIP) resident advisory board
reviews the applications in public meetings and makes funding recommendations to the Mayor and Council. The
Mayor provides a second set of funding recommendations which this year are identical to the advisory board’s
except one project; $150,000 for Westside Art was proposed after the CDCIP board completed their
deliberations. The Council considers both sets of funding recommendations and ultimately decides project
specific funding. Funding for capital improvements sometimes occurs in midyear budget amendments but the
annual CIP process is the Council’s largest annual opportunity to fund large public construction projects. This
report provides an overview of the proposed overall budget for FY2024, projects of Council Member interest not
recommended for funding, policy questions, and further details in the Additional Info section and attachments.
Overview of the FY2024 CIP Proposed Budget
The total FY2024 CIP budget is $39.3 million which is $7.4 million (16%) less than last year. FY2023 was a
record year for CIP with nearly $47 million total funding plus the $67.5 Million Sales Tax Bond and $85 million
Parks, Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bond. The proposed FY2024 CIP budget is closer to the City’s
typical total CIP funding level in recent years. However, the General Fund transfer to CIP (first row in the table
below) is 6.8% of ongoing revenues which is slightly below the 7% seen in most budget years (last year was a
record at 9%). An additional $851,814 would be needed to reach the 7% level for FY2024. Most of the lower total
CIP funding is caused by removal of $3.7 million in one-time funds used in FY2023 to replace hand held radio
equipment and the shift of $1.8 million from Funding Our Future for parks from CIP (as it was in the FY2023
budget) to personnel costs. The Administration indicates that ongoing funding spent on vehicles this year for
those personnel could be added to CIP again next year. The table below details funding sources for CIP by fiscal
year. See Attachment 5 for an overview of the major CIP Funding Sources. Other highlights include:
$10.3 Million Unrestricted Funds – $10,287,935 of the ongoing transfer from the General Fund are unrestricted
funds available for any new projects (the most flexible funding available). This does not include the Funding Our
Future source which the Council has restricted to five critical need areas.
Page | 10
$1.4 Million Decrease of Impact Fees Spending – The amount of impact fees in the proposed CIP budget is the
smallest amount since FY2017. There are over $20.7 million of impact fees available to spend across the four
types: fire, parks, police, and transportation. Most of the available funds are for parks and transportation. See
Additional info section for more. It’s worth noting the Council sometimes approves significant amounts of
impact fees for capital expenses in midyear budget amendments so CIP is not the only relevant budget opening.
$300,000 Decrease for County 1/4¢ Sales Tax for Transportation – This became a new funding source three
years ago and is available to transportation projects per state law. As seen in other sales tax revenue line items,
this one has experienced significant growth in recent years but is projects to slightly decrease in FY2024.
$10.9 Million Debt and Lease Payments – $10,901,526 (44%) of the General Fund transfer to CIP (including
Funding Our Future dollars) is needed to cover debt payments and the Crime Lab lease payment. However, it
should be noted that $4,393,161 of this amount is for a first-year payment on a proposed sales tax revenue bond
for which the Council has not approved the list of projects. This funding could be used for FY2024 projects if the
Council declines to proceed with the bond or approves a smaller bond.
Comparison of CIP Funding Sources by Fiscal Year
Projects of Council Member Interest Not Recommended for Funding by Advisory Board & Mayor
The total cost to fully fund the four projects listed below is $2,514,126. Of this amount, $747,000 could come
from parks impact fees which is itemized by project below. The Council could fund these projects by adding
funding to CIP above the Mayor’s Recommended Budget and/or shifting funding from projects that are
recommended for funding. Projects are listed in district numerical order:
Council Member Petro: Project #21 is $830,000 for Rose Park Lane Landscaping, Trail Rebuild, and Safety
-$235,000 is eligible for parks impact fees
-The project could be partially funded in two or three phases:
o $565,000 for the trail reconstruction as the first phase
o $235,000 for irrigation and tree planting as the second phase
o $30,000 for two solar feedback speed limit signs which could be done independently from the
other two phases (at any time) and potentially with funding from the temporary traffic calming
intervention funding in the Transportation Division’s base budget
Council Member Puy: Project #18 requesting $500,000 for Madsen Park Improvements
$ C h an g e % C h an g e
Ge ne r al Fund 1 5 ,1 2 6 ,884$ 2 5 ,2 3 1 ,4 3 1$ 2 1 ,1 89 ,4 6 1$ (4 ,0 4 1 ,9 7 0 )$ -1 6 %
Fu nd ing Our Futu r e *3 ,5 80 ,0 0 0$ 5 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 3 ,6 2 6 ,87 5$ (1 ,4 7 3 ,1 2 5 )$ -2 9 %
Cla ss C 3 ,0 2 1 ,7 0 6$ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 3 ,5 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 1 7 %
I m p a c t Fe e s**8,2 7 6 ,1 0 3$ 4 ,1 5 9 ,7 5 5$ 2 ,9 6 8,85 0$ (1 ,1 9 0 ,9 0 5 )$ -2 9 %
CDBG 3 2 2 ,0 0 0$ 7 2 2 ,0 0 0$ -$ (7 2 2 ,0 0 0 )$ ONE-TI ME
Re p u r p o se Old CI P A c c o u nts***2 5 2 ,2 7 1$ 1 5 2 ,6 6 0$ PENDI NG -ONE-TI ME
Co u nt y 1 /4 ¢ Sale s Ta x 4 ,9 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 8,0 0 0 ,0 0 0$ 7 ,7 0 0 ,0 0 0$ (3 0 0 ,0 0 0 )$ -4 %
Su r p lu s Land Fund 2 0 0 ,0 0 0$ -$ -$ -$ ONE-TI ME
Sm it h's Naming Rig h t s Re v e nue 1 5 4 ,0 0 0$ 1 5 4 ,0 0 0$ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0$ (4 ,0 0 0 )$ -3 %
SLC Sp o r ts Co mple x ESCO 1 4 8,5 0 5$ 1 4 8,5 0 5$ 1 5 0 ,5 0 0$ 1 ,9 9 5$ 1 %
Me m o r ial Ho use Re nt Re v e nue 6 8,5 5 4$ 6 8,5 5 4$ 5 0 ,0 0 0$ (1 8,5 5 4 )$ -2 7 %
TOTA L 3 6 ,0 2 7 ,1 3 1$ 4 6 ,7 3 6 ,9 0 5$ 3 9 ,3 3 5 ,6 86$ (7 ,4 0 1 ,2 1 9 )$ -1 6 %
TOTA L w ith o u t ONE-TI ME 3 5 ,2 5 2 ,86 0$ 4 5 ,86 2 ,2 4 5$ 3 9 ,3 3 5 ,6 86$ (6,5 2 6 ,5 5 9 )$ -1 4 %
*I nc lu d e s % to CI P "o ff t h e to p" av aila b le t o a ny pro je c t , a nd fu nding fo r t ra nsit , a nd pub lic rig h t o f w ay
infra st ru c ture . A ls o , fu nd ing so urc e is o ng o ing b ut Co u nc il c o u ld c h ange t h e u se c a te go rie s in t h e fu ture
**Th e re a re fo ur im p a c t fe e ty pe s: fire , p a rks, po lic e a nd st re e ts
***I nc lu de s re c ap t u re d fu nds fro m m u lt ip le funding so u rc e s
No t e : Th e re 's a $2 2 ,89 2 d e b t se rv ic e re sc o pe re duc tio n no t se pa rate d o u t in t h e ta b le ab o v e fo r FY 2 0 2 2
C I P Fu n din g So u rc e s A do pt e d
2 0 2 1-2 2
A do p t e d
2 0 2 2 -2 3
Pro p o se d
2 0 2 3 -2 4
FY 2 0 2 3 t o FY 2 0 2 4
Page | 11
-$300,000 is eligible from park impact fees
-CDCIP Board said if additional funding is available, then this project is their next highest priority
-Madsen Park is also identified as a neighborhood park to be reimagined with funding from the Parks,
Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bond
Council Member Valdemoros: Project #22 requesting $530,000 for Richmond Park Playground
-$212,000 is eligible from park impact fees
-Richmond Park is also identified as a neighborhood park to be reimagined with funding from the Parks,
Trails, and Open Space General Obligation Bond
Council Member Dugan: Project #46 requesting $494,126 for Westside of Foothill Drive Safety Enhancements
-Some elements might be partially eligible for transportation impact fees
-The project is from the 2017 Foothill Drive Implementation Strategy but this was not brought to the
Council for adoption
-A request has been submitted to the Administration for phasing options
Council Member Fowler: Project #32 requesting $150,000 for Sugar House Safe Side Streets Phase 2
-Phase 1 received $153,221 in FY2022 CIP for studying, testing, public engagement, and designs of traffic
calming improvements on six local streets: Hollywood Avenue, Ramona Avenue, Garfield Avenue,
Lincoln Street, 1000 East, and McClelland Street
-An application was submitted in the FY2023 CIP cycle for Phase 2 but did not receive additional funding
-The FY2024 CIP application is requesting funds that would be combined with remaining funds from
Phase 1 to complete the traffic calming improvements recommended in the Phase 1 traffic study
Simplified Funding Log and Project Scores from CDCIP Resident Advisory Board
(See Attachment 4 for the simplified funding log)
The CDCIP Board scored each CIP application which serves as a general guide to help inform funding decisions
but is not meant to be strictly adhered to. The Board recommends that if additional funding were available, then
project #18 Madsen Park Improvements be prioritized. The log also includes a social vulnerability index
developed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) using 16 factors to rank Census Tracts. The next column
shows scores from the Sustainability Department where 10 is the highest (best) possible. Then the Parks,
Natural Lands, Urban Forestry, and Trails or PNUT Board scores are shown where 1 is the highest (best)
possible. The last column on the sight side shows current pavement conditions for public right of way (streets,
alleys, curb & gutter, and sidewalks) where applicable.
Recapture Funds from Completed Projects and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years
(Attachment 6 – Pending at time of publishing this staff report)
The CIP and Debt Management Resolution (Attachment 1) states that remaining funds should be considered for
recapture from completed projects and unfinished projects that are older than three years unless there has been
significant progress. The table in Attachment 6 is the staff’s attempt to follow up on the Council’s policy
guidance for CIP projects. Most of the 128 projects received General Fund dollars or impact fees. Some of this
funding could be recaptured by the Council as one-time revenue for General Fund uses, however, the other
sources like Class C, CDBG, impact fees, and donations have uses limited by law. The table was sent to the
Administration to identify whether a project is completed and status updates for unfinished projects. A response
and potential funding to recapture will be added to one of the Council’s upcoming unresolved issues briefings.
POLICY QUESTIONS
1.Capital Asset Plan Early Policy Check-in Briefing – The Council may wish to schedule a briefing
for an early policy check-in about the guiding priorities and framework for developing the Capital Asset
Plan (five-year CIP plan). The Non-departmental budget has a $350,000 transfer to IMS for Capital
Asset Planning software to facilitate development and periodic updating of the plan. See Attachment 7
for the Council’s potential policy goals, metrics, and requests from a briefing in 2019.
2.Livable Streets (Traffic Calming) Program Funding Level – The Council may wish to discuss
the funding level and pace of implementing the Livable Streets Program. See Attachment 9 with
information from the Transportation Division including first year accomplishments and maps of the
highest need zones. The Division anticipates completing six or seven zones (neighborhoods) at the
proposed funding level of $1.35 million in FY2024 combined with the $2 million from FY2023 CIP. An
Page | 12
additional $9 million would be needed to fully fund the remaining 18 high need zones (red, orange, and
yellow on the color-coded map assuming an average cost of $500,000 per zone).
3.Combine Two Separate $150,000 Appropriations for Westside Art – The Council may wish to
continue the discussion from the RDA FY2024 budget overview about whether to combine two separate
$150,000 appropriations proposed for new art on the Westside. One appropriation is proposed in CIP
and the other is proposed in the RDA 9-Line Project Area.
4.Inflationary Price Increases and the Cost Overrun Account – The Council may wish to ask the
Administration how inflationary price increases have impacted departments utilizing the CIP Cost
Overrun Account, and if additional funding may be needed to avoid project scope reductions. The
Council could also re-evaluate the funding level for the account and/or the formula for the maximum
amounts a project may receive, which hasn’t been updated since 2004 (see section 11 of Attachment 1).
5.Resources to Support Constituent Applications – The Council may wish to discuss with the
Administration the need to address geographic equity issues with additional targeted City resources for
neighborhoods that submit few or no constituent applicants. Some Council Members expressed interest
in being proactive to support constituent applications from neighborhoods with higher poverty rates.
Some constituents and CDCIP Board Members commented at public meetings in recent years that they
felt like some projects get more support from departments than others.
6.CIP Project Status Reports – The Council may wish to ask the Administration about mechanisms to
facilitate the up-to-date sharing of information on current CIP projects. In the past, there were a variety
of mechanisms to share information, ranging from topic-by-topic email requests to consolidated
monthly reports. Council Members could then more quickly provide accurate/timely information to
interested constituents.
ADDITIONAL & BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Definition of a CIP Project
As defined in the Council-adopted 2017 Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution (Attachment
1), a CIP project must “involve the construction, purchase or renovation of buildings, parks, streets or other
physical structures, … have a useful life of five or more years, … have a cost of $50,000 or more, … or significant
functionality can be demonstrated…such as software.” The Council also set a three-year spending deadline as
part of the guiding policies. CIP accounts older than three years are periodically reviewed for recapture from
projects that finished under budget or were not pursued.
Cost Estimates for Regular CIP Projects
(Attachment 8)
Cost estimates will be updated over the summer to inform the Council’s project-specific deliberations in July and
August. The current version was last updated in July 2022. Cost estimates for various types of projects are based
on actual costs from recent years. The document was developed by Council staff in collaboration with the
Administration. The three categories of project cost estimates are parks, streets, and transportation. Inflation
and supply chain constraints have continued to impact the City’s capital projects so the costs shown in the
current version are likely more expensive now. Some categories have seen significant increases while others have
closer to typical inflation rate increases. The Engineering Division provided some context that the City doesn’t
know to what extent the larger price increases are temporary (such as related to pandemic caused short-term
supply chain disruptions) or longer-term trends.
Comparison of CIP Project Requests by Year and Type
This chart was prepared by Council staff as a comparison of total project requests on the CIP funding log since
FY2017, and whether the application is come a constituent or internal to a City department. The FY2024 CIP
cycle has 59 project requests which is about average over the time shown in the chart. FY2021 had the fewest
with 19 project requests only from departments (it was intentionally an “abbreviated CIP cycle” per the
Administration at the time). FY2023 had the most with 90 project requests.
Page | 13
Surplus Land Fund
The Administration reports the current available to spend balance is $2,374,127 and another $2,195,130 is
proposed in FY2023 Budget Amendment #6. If approved, then the total available balance would be $4,569,257.
The Surplus Land Fund receives proceeds from the sale of real property (land and buildings). According to City
policy the Surplus Land Fund can be spent on purchasing real property. The funds are one-time because the
property can only be sold once.
Cost Overrun Account
The Administration reports the current available to spend balance is $823,081 and another $100,000 is
proposed in FY2023 Budget Amendment #6 as a reimbursement to the account. The FY2024 CIP budget
includes $247,571 of additional funding. If the two appropriations are approved, then the total available balance
would be $1,170,652. The Council established this account for projects that experience costs slightly higher than
budgeted. A formula determines how much additional funding may be pulled from the Cost Overrun account
depending on the total Council-approved budget. See section 11 of Attachment 1 for the formula. This process
allows the Administration to add funding to a project without returning to the Council in a budget amendment.
A written notification to the Council on uses is required. The purpose is to allow projects to proceed with
construction instead of delaying projects until the Council can act on a budget amendment which typically takes
a few months.
1.5% for New Art and Maintenance of Existing Artworks
(New annual report is pending from the Arts Council)
The Administration stated the annual report required by ordinance about maintenance of City artworks in the
past fiscal year and planned for the next will be transmitted to the Council in July or August. This timing is after
the annual budget is adopted so the amount of funding available in CIP overall allows the 1.5% to be calculated
and inform how those funds would be used.
Salt Lake City Code, Chapter 2.30, established the Percent for Art Fund and designates roles for the Art Design
Board and Arts Council related to artist selection, project review and placement. The Public Art Program also
oversees projects with funding from the Airport and RDA. In April 2021 the Council amended Chapter 2.30 to
make several changes to the ordinance including an increase from 1% to 1.5% of ongoing unrestricted CIP
funding for art. There is no ceiling so the Council could approve funding for art above 1.5%.
The ordinance also sets a range of 10%-20% for how much of the resulting annual funding is allocated to
maintenance (as opposed to new artworks). This section of the ordinance also states that before funds are
deposited into the separate public art maintenance fund a report from the Administration will be provided to the
Council identifying works of art that require maintenance and estimated costs. This creates the first ongoing
10 13 19 14
0
24
41
29
67
37
35 40
19
50
49
30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2022 FY2024
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Total Project Requests by Fiscal Year (FY)
Constituent Departmental
Page | 14
dedicated funding for conservation and maintenance of the City’s public art collection consisting of over 270
pieces and counting. The collection is expected to continue growing. Note that in Budget Amendment #2 of
FY20 the Council made a one-time appropriation of $200,000 to establish an art maintenance fund.
Impact Fee Unallocated “Available to Spend” Balances and Refund Tracking
The Council approved several million dollars of impact fee projects in the past few years. The table below is
current as of April 24, 2023, and includes a couple adjustments based on Budget Amendment #6 of FY2023.
Available to spend impact fee balances are bank account balances subtracting encumbrances and expired funds.
The Mayor’s recommended CIP budget proposes using $2,728,850 of parks impact fees and $240,000 of
transportation impact fees. The total amount of the four impact fee types is $20,730,097. Impact fees must be
encumbered within six years of the City receiving them. Expired impact fees must be returned to the entity who
paid them with interest over the intervening six years.
Type Unallocated Cash
“Available to Spend”Next Refund Trigger Date Amount of Expiring
Impact Fees
Fire $0 More than two years away -
Parks $13,980,808 More than two years away -
Police $1,339,030 More than two years away -
Transportation $5,410,259 More than two years away -
Note: Encumbrances are an administrative function when impact fees are held under a contract
Clarifying “Complete Streets” and “Livable Streets” Initiatives
(See Attachment 9 for a Livable Streets Program update from the Transportation Division including first year
accomplishments and maps of the highest need zones)
There are two separate pots of funding – one for “complete streets” and another for “Livable Streets” – which are
both under the CIP umbrella. The “complete streets” funding is intended to be used to ensure that major street
reconstruction projects meet the standards defined in City Code Chapter 14.06, with elements like bike lanes
(Complete Streets). The “Livable Streets” funding is intended to be used for neighborhood scale traffic calming
projects as defined by the Livable Streets program presented to the Council in October 2021. This is separate
from street reconstruction projects. The program ranked all 113 zones citywide across several variables including
crash data, community assets, and resident socioeconomic factors. In August 2022, the Council provided policy
guidance that a citywide needs-based equity approach should be used to prioritize zones based on the ranking.
CIP Tracking Technology Improvements
The Administration reports improvements are ongoing to CIP tracking of projects and applications. A project
dashboard is in development. Once complete, the Administration plans to make the dashboard publicly
available. The City currently provides a public interactive construction and permits project information map
available here: http://maps.slcgov.com/mws/projects.htm
ATTACHMENTS
1. Capital and Debt Management Guiding Policies Resolution 29 of 2017
2. FY2024 CIP Funding Log – Note the spreadsheet from the Administration is not formatted for printing
3. FY2024 Mayor’s Recommended CIP Budget Book Log
4. FY2024 Simplified CIP Funding Log by CDCIP Board Scores
5. Overview of CIP Major Funding Sources
6. List of Completed and Unfinished Projects Older than Three Years
7. Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
8. Regular CIP Projects Cost Estimates (last updated July 2022)
9. Livable Streets Traffic Calming Program First Year Accomplishments Summary and Updated Zone Map
10. 50/50 Concrete Program Utilization Summary from 2020 to Present
ACRONYMS
CAP – Capital Asset Plan (a five-year CIP plan)
CDBG – Community Development Block Grants
CDC – Centers for Disease Control
CDCIP – Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board
CIP – Capital Improvement Program
ESCO – Energy Service Company
FTE – Full-time Employee
Page | 15
FY – Fiscal Year
GO Bond – General Obligation Bond
IMS – Information Management Systems Department
PSB – Public Safety Building
Item B4
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION SHEET
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
tinyurl.com/SLCFY24CIP
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Ben Luedtke
Policy and Budget Analyst
DATE:August 8, 2023
RE: FY 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget
Staff Note: The Council previously held a CIP public hearing on July 18. The Council is scheduled to
vote on the CIP project-specific funding at the August 15 formal meeting.
MOTION 1 – CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING
I move that the Council close the public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO . _29_0F 2017
(Salt Lake City Council capital and debt management policies.)
R 17-1
R 17-13
WHEREAS, the Salt Lake City Council ("City Council" or "Council") demonstrated its
commitment to improving the City's Capital Improvement Program in order to better address the
deferred and long-term infrastructure needs of Salt Lake City; and
WHEREAS, the analysis of Salt Lake City's General Fund Capital Improvement
Program presented by Citygate Associates in February 1999, recommended that the Council
review and update the capital policies of Salt Lake Corporation ("City") in order to provide
direction to the capital programming and budgeting process and adopt and implement a formal
comprehensive debt policy and management plan; and
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program and budgeting practices have
evolved since 1999 and the City Council wishes to update the capital and debt management
policies by updating and restating such policies in their entirety to better reflect current
practices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to improve transparency of funding opportunities
across funding sources including General Fund dollars, impact fees, Class C (gas tax) funds,
Redevelopment Agency funds, Public Utilities funds, repurposing old Capital Improvement
Program funds and other similar funding sources.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Salt Lake City,
Utah:
That the City Council has determined that the following capital and debt management
policies shall guide the Council as they continue to address the deferred and long-term
infrastructure needs within Salt Lake City:
Capital Policies
1. Capital Project Definition-The Council intends to define a capital project as follows:
"Capital improvements involve the construction, purchase or renovation of
buildings, parks, streets or other physical structures. A capital improvement must
have a useful life of five or more years. A capital improvement is not a recurring
capital outlay item (such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine) or a maintenance
expense (such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches). In order to be
considered a capital project, a capital improvement must also have a cost of
$50,000 or more unless such capital improvement's significant functionality can
be demonstrated to warrant its inclusion as a capital project (such as software).
Acquisition of equipment is not considered part of a capital project unless such
acquisition of equipment is an integral part of the cost of the capital project."
2. Annual Capital Budget Based on 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan-The Council requests that
the Mayor's Recommended Annual Capital Budget be developed based upon the 10-Year
Capital Facilities Plan and be submitted each fiscal year to the City Council for consideration
as part of the Mayor 's Recommended Budget no later than the first Tuesday of May.
3. Multiyear Financial Forecasts-The Council requests that the Administration :
a. Prepare multi-year revenue and expenditure forecasts that correspond to the capital
program period;
b . Prepare an analysis of the City's financial condition , debt service levels within the capital
improvement budget, and capacity to finance future capital projects; and
c . Present this information to the Council in conjunction with the presentation of each one-
year capital budget.
4. Annual General Fund Transfer to CIP Funding Goal-Allocation of General Fund revenues
for capital improvements on an annual basis will be determined as a percentage of General
Fund revenue . The Council has a goal that no less than nine percent (9%) of ongoing General
Fund revenues be invested annually in the Capital Improvement Fund.
5. Maintenance Standard-The Council intends that the City will maintain its physical assets at
a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance
and replacement costs.
6 . Capital Project Prioritization-The Council intends to give priority consideration to projects
that:
a. Preserve and protect the health and safety of the community;
b. Are mandated by the state and/or federal government; and
c. Provide for the renovation of existing facilities resulting in a preservation of the
community's prior investment, in decreased operating costs or other significant cost
savings , or in improvements to the environmental quality of the City and its
neighborhoods.
7. External Partnerships -All other considerations being equal, the Council intends to give fair
consideration to projects where there is an opportunity to coordinate with other agencies ,
establish a public/ private partnership, or secure grant funding .
8. Aligning Project Cost Estimates and Funding-The Council intends to follow a guideline of
approving construction funding for a capital project in the fiscal year immediately following
the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less accurate as more time
passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-estimating project costs by funding capital
projects in a timely manner.
9. Advisory Board Funding Recommendations-The Council intends that all capital projects be
evaluated and prioritized by the Community Development and Capital Improvement
Program Advisory Board . The resulting recommendations shall be provided to the Mayor ,
and shall be included along with the Mayor 's funding recommendations in conjunction with
the Annual Capital budget transmittal , as noted in Paragraph two above.
10. Prioritize Funding Projects in the 10-Year Plan-The Council does not intend to fund any
project that has not been included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan for at least one (1)
year prior to proposed funding, unless extenuating circumstances are adequately identified.
11. Cost Overrun Process -The Council requests that any change order to any capital
improvement project follow the criteria established in Resolution No. 65 of2004 which
reads as follows:
a. "The project is under construction and all other funding options and/ or methods
have been considered and it has been determined that additional funding is still
required.
b. Cost overrun funding will be approved based on the following formula:
1. 20% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets of $100,000 or less;
ii. 15% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets between $100,001 and $250,000;
iii. 10% or below of the budget adopted by the City Council for project
budgets over $250,000 with a maximum overrun cost of $1oo,ooo.
c. The funds are not used to pay additional City Engineering fees.
d. The Administration will submit a written notice to the City Council detailing the
additional funding awarded to projects at the time of administrative approval.
e. If a project does not meet the above mentioned criteria the request for additional
funding will be submitted as part of the next scheduled budget opening.
However, if due to timing constraints the cost overrun cannot be reasonably
considered as part of a regularly scheduled budget opening, the Administration
will prepare the necessary paperwork for review by the City Council at its next
regularly scheduled meeting."
12. Recapture Funds from Completed Capital Projects-The Council requests that the
Administration include in the first budget amendment each year those Capital Improvement
Program Fund accounts where the project has been completed and a project balance remains.
It is the Council's intent that all account balances from closed projects be recaptured and
placed in the CIP Cost Overrun Contingency Account for the remainder of the fiscal year, at
which point any remaining amounts will be transferred to augment the following fiscal year's
General Fund ongoing allocation.
13. Recapture Funds from Unfinished Capital Projects-Except for situations in which
significant progress is reported to the Council, it is the Council's intent that all account
balances from unfinished projects older than three years be moved out of the specific project
account to the CIP Fund Balance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, account balances for bond
financed projects and outside restricted funds (which could include grants, SAA or other
restricted funds) shall not be moved out of the specific project account.
14. Surplus Land Fund within CIP Fund Balance -Revenues received from the sale of real
property will go to the unappropriated balance of the Capital Projects Fund and the revenue
will be reserved to purchase real property unless extenuating circumstances warrant a
different use. It is important to note that collateralized land cannot be sold.
15 . Transparency of Ongoing Costs Created by Capital Projects-Any long-term fiscal impact to
the General Fund from a capital project creating ongoing expenses such as maintenance,
changes in electricity /utility usage, or additional personnel will be included in the CIP
funding log and project funding request. Similarly, capital projects that decrease ongoing
expenses will detail potential savings in the CIP funding log.
16. Balance Budget without Defunding or Delaying Capital Projects -Whenever possible,
capital improvement projects should neither be delayed nor eliminated to balance the
General Fund budget.
17. Identify Sources when Repurposing Old Capital Project Funds-Whenever the
Administration proposes repurposing funds from completed capital projects the source(s)
should be identified including the project name, balance of remaining funds, whether the
project scope was reduced, and whether funding needs related to the original project exist.
18. Identify Capital Project Details -For each capital project, the capital improvement projects
funding log should identify:
a. The Community Development and Capital Improvement Program Advisory Board's
funding recommendations,
b. The Administration's funding recommendations,
c. The project name and a brief summary of the project,
d . Percentage of impact fee eligibility and type,
e. The project life expectancy,
f. Whether the project is located in an RDA project area,
g. Total project cost and an indication as to whether a project is one phase of a larger
project,
h. Subtotals where the project contains multiple scope elements that could be funded
separately,
1. Any savings derived from funding multiple projects together,
j. Timing for when a project will come on-line,
k. Whether the project implements a master plan,
1. Whether the project significantly advances the City's renewable energy or
sustainability goals,
m . Ongoing annual operating impact to the General Fund,
n. Any community support for the project -such as community councils or petitions,
o. Communities served,
p. Legal requirements/mandates,
q. Whether public health and safety is affected,
r. Whether the project is included in the 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan,
s. Whether the project leverages external funding sources, and
t. Any partner organizations .
Debt Management Policies
1. Prioritize Debt Service for Projects in the 10 -Year Capital Facilities Plan -The Council
intends to utilize long-term borrowing only for capital improvement projects that are
included in the City's 10-Year Capital Facilities Plan or in order to take advantage of
opportunities to restructure or refund current debt. Short-term borrowing might be utilized in
anticipation of future tax collections to finance working capital needs.
2. Evaluate Existing Debt before Issuing a New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration provide an analysis of the City's debt capacity, and how each proposal meets
the Council's debt policies, prior to proposing any projects for debt financing. This analysis
should include the effect of the bond issue on the City's debt ratios , the City 's ability to
finance future projects of equal or higher priority , and the City's bond ratings.
3. Identify Repayment Source when Proposing New Debt-The Council requests that the
Administration identify the source of funds to cover the anticipated debt service requirement
whenever the Administration recommends borrowing additional funds.
4. Monitoring Debt Impact to the General Fund-The Council requests that the Administration
analyze the impact of debt-financed capital projects on the City's operating budget and
coordinate this analysis with the budget development process.
5. Disclosure of Bond Feasibility and Challenges -The Council requests that the
Administration provide a statement from the City's financial advisor that each proposed bond
issue appears feasible for bond financing as proposed. Such statement from the City's
financial advisor should also include an indication of requirements or circumstances that the
Council should be aware of when considering the proposed bond issue (such as any net
negative fiscal impacts on the City 's operating budget, debt capacity limits , or rating
implications).
6. A void Use of Financial Derivative Instruments -The Council intends to avoid using interest
rate derivatives or other financial derivatives when considering debt issuance.
7 . Maintain Reasonable Debt Ratios-The Council does not intend to issue debt that would
cause the City's debt ratio benchmarks to exceed moderate ranges as indicated by the
municipal bond rating industry .
8. Maintain High Level Bond Ratings-The Council intends to maintain the highest credit
rating feasible and to adhere to fiscally responsible practices when issuing debt.
9. Consistent Annual Debt Payments Preferred -The Council requests that the Administration
structure debt service payments in level amounts over the useful life of the financed
project(s) unless anticipated revenues dictate otherwise or the useful life of the financed
project(s) suggests a different maturity schedule.
10. Sustainable Debt Burden-The Council intends to combine pay-as-you-go strategy with
long-term financing to keep the debt burden sufficiently low to merit continued AAA general
obligation bond ratings and to provide sufficient available debt capacity in case of
emergency.
11. Lowest Cost Options-The City will seek the least costly financing available when evaluating
debt financing options .
12. Avoid Creating Structural Deficits-The City will minimize the use of one-time revenue to
fund programs/projects that require ongoing costs including debt repayments.
13. Aligning Debt and Project Timelines-Capital improvement projects financed through the
issuance of bonded debt will have a debt service that is not longer than the useful life of the
project.
Passed by the City Council of Salt Lake City, Utah, this -~3L.Lr_...d ___ day of
October , 2017.
ATTEST :
HB _A TTY -#64309 -v3-CIP _a nd _ Debt_ Management_Pol icies
SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL
By 4 = ASL
CHAIRPERSON -=-::::::::____
Salt Lake City
App ed As To Form
By: ~~~~~~~.P
aysen Oldroyd
Da e: lt:>/-:z.../ 17
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1
Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning
Requested Funding: $190,000
Many complex structural and drainage issues at Library Plaza are causing known
settling and damage to critical materials (e.g., pavers, railings and footings, walls)
visible on the surface. This project will include an investigation into these issues,
followed by planning and design to complete the necessary changes. Specific plaza
elements that will be investigated include the wedge wall near 200 East, fountain,
retaining walls and pavers, and overall stability throughout the plaza. The project
will also include a planning process to identify solutions and designs for activating
the plaza. These will mitigate currently unknown and known barriers (including
direct sunlight and little shade or protection from the elements) to increased
usage in line with its original intent as a public event space. Salt Lake City is a
potential candidate for the 2030 Olympics and structural repairs, retrofitting, and
reimagining space within this site will be critical first steps if the City wants to use
this site to host events and accommodate large crowds. If funded, this request
would lay the groundwork for a funding application for construction within the
next few years. Once construction is funded, this project will be a joint venture
between Public Lands and Facilities.
190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
2
Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide
Requested Funding: $900,000
This request will fund two key projects as well as providing ongoing funding to a
citywide program that installs warranted crossing beacons, traffic signals, or other
traffic control devices to address safety issues. 1. Main Street Pedestrian Crossings
-Crosswalks on Main Street are simply inadequate by modern standards; the
Transportation Division has developed a phased improvement plan that began
with a 2022 resurfacing project after which Main Street was restriped with one
travel lane in each direction. Ten crossing locations need upgraded crosswalks;
about half will be done in 2023 with funds already allocated. This request is for
construction funds for the remaining locations. 2. Glendale Park / 1700 South -
Community engagement show an overwhelming desire from neighborhood
residents to have a safer and more comfortable way to cross 1700 South, with
residents repeatedly requesting a tunnel or bridge to cross this wide roadway
carrying heavy truck traffic. This request is for funds to upgrade the existing
crosswalk at 1300 W 1700 S from flashing yellow beacons (RRFBs) to a pedestrian-
activated signal (HAWK, Toucan, or half-signal), to fully stop traffic with a red
light between the residential Glendale neighborhoods to the north and the new
Glendale Regional Park (Phase 1 - 2024) to the south. 3. Citywide traffic safety
projects include the installation of traffic control devices such as signals, flashers,
signs, or markings to improve pedestrian safety.
270,000$ -$ 540,000$ -$ 90,000$ -$ 270,000$ -$ 540,000$ -$ 90,000$ -$
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 1
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
3
200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements
Requested Funding: $234,000
200 East ADA and sidewalk improvements. This project seeks to bring a section of
sidewalks near senior housing into compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). It also seeks to improve walkability in a low-income
neighborhood by fixing a gap in continuous sidewalks. The area — between 1700
South and 2100 South — is home to a higher proportion of people with disabilities
than any other Census tract in the state of Utah, yet a portion of it is inaccessible
to people with disabilities. There is a 300 ft segment of 200 East that does not
have sidewalks on the east side of the street between Garfield Ave and Coatsville
Ave. Through discussions with City staff and the constituent applicant, we
developed a solution that provides a continuous ADA accessible pathway on the
west side of 200 East between Garfield Ave and 1700 South. This involves new
curb ramps at Downington Ave/200 E and Garfield Ave/200 E), about 50 ft of
sidewalk replacement, and pavement markings to formalize the crosswalks.
Additionally, a crosswalk upgrades will be added at 200 East 1700 South, where
there is a marked crosswalk near a high school, the Salt Lake Community College
and the Tim and Brenda Huval daycare center on the north side of 1700 South.
Driver cooperation is low at this crosswalk, and a rectangular rapid flashing
beacon (RRFB) will help to ensure compliance and a safer crossing.
234,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 234,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
4
Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments
Requested Funding: $1,500,000
Funds will construct bus stops along frequent transit routes that reflect the
recommendations of the Transit Master Plan. Examples include the 200 (State
Street), 209 (900 East) and 217 (Redwood Road). Improvements ensure that
stops are legal, accessible, safe, and convenient. This is a partnership program
with UTA, with investment by the City made to complement (rather than
supplant) UTA's plans for bus stop construction as articulated in their Bus Stop
Master Plan, and City investments generate UTA investments. Salt Lake City
constructs the concrete pad, and UTA provides the shelters, benches, bike racks,
and trash cans. They also empty the trash cans! If accessibility is limited by
bicycle and/or pedestrian connections to bus stops, these funds may be used to
close those gaps. Funds may also provide match to $5.59 million in federal grants
received so far for transit hubs (especially 200 S East Downtown Hub, Westside
North Temple Hub). The transit hubs are multi-million dollar projects; a portion
of these funds will be used to provide the required local match. These projects are
also partnership projects with UTA (and other potential partners, such as the
University of Utah and real estate developers), with both agencies seeking funds,
providing match, and together creating the full project. In some cases, these funds
were combined with other projects to maximize those investments, for example by
mobilizing construction crews once for two or more related and co-located
projects. This also serves to minimize construction disruption to the community.
-$ 990,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$ -$ 990,000$ -$ -$ 110,000$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 2
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
5
Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide
Requested Funding: $6,600,000
This program funding request provides supplemental funds to street projects that
have been found, including through input from the community, to need additional
complete street elements such as sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, bikeways, safer
intersections, placemaking, and street greening. • 2100 South (700 E to 1300 E) -
This corridor in the heart of Sugarhouse has long needed reconstruction and
represents a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make substantial upgrades to its
central role in one of Salt Lake City's largest and most walkable business districts.
This street currently does a poor job of serving all who use it. This funding would
enable the City to complete a meaningful transformation of this critical roadway
with complete streets improvements for all modes. • Virginia Street (11th Ave to
South Temple) - This neighborhood road provides access between the Avenues
and South Temple for people driving, walking, riding, or taking the bus. The road
is missing sections of sidewalk on the west side, lacks bike lanes (more bicyclists
use Virginia Street than other principal north-south streets in the Avenues), and
has aging medians that the neighborhood has long desired to have removed (and
replaced with more effective traffic calming). The requested funding would fill the
gaps of missing sidewalk, improve bus stops, enhance pedestrian crossings, add
uphill bike lane/downhill shared lane, and implement traffic calming. • Citywide
corridor designs and restriping, primarily tied to Streets Division surface
treatments and/or in preparation for reconstruction.
-$ -$ 3,293,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,293,000$ -$ -$ -$
6
Public Way Concrete 2023/2024
Requested Funding: $750,000
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks,
accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way
through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this
vital program in the last 4 years has averaged 53%. Providing a fully accessible
public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990. Not only is it the City's legal responsibility to ensure the
public way is accessible to all, it is a moral obligation.
-$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 3
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
7
Livable Streets Implementation
Requested Funding: $2,500,000
This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to
Transportation staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable
prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in
the areas most in need.
250,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 1,394,126$ -$ -$ -$ -$
8
Neighborhood Byways
Requested Funding: $800,000
Neighborhood byways create pleasant and convenient routes for people walking,
bicycling, or rolling by encouraging safe travel speeds, discouraging cut-through
vehicle traffic, providing safe crossings of busy streets, and connecting people to
key community destinations. These funds will be used for the engineering design
and construction of the Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway, and
for the engineering design of the Sugar House to the U Neighborhood Byway.
Both of these projects are currently in conceptual design with significant
community input. The Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway has
already received a state grant for $900,000 toward its $1.5 million construction
budget. This CIP request will serve as the required 40% match to this grant.
440,000$ -$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$ 440,000$ -$ 360,000$ -$ -$ -$
9
Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024
Requested Funding: $4,500,000
This annual program funds reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including
curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where
appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian
access improvements.
2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$ 2,250,000$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 4
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
10
Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion
Requested Funding: $507,000
This park (Emery St and 800 S.) currently has a half court - which is used,
frequently, with players spilling out all over the court and grass surrounding it.
Basketball, to an extent, is the glue that holds the youth in our neighborhood
together. It creates bonds. Sees no color - just "mad skills"! This park has needed
some TLC for a VERY long time. This year, we finally saw some improvements in
the form of sprinkler repairs. Our volleyball court received some intense care to
pull out weeds, and till the sand. Guess what? The youth and families are now
converging for a game or two every other day. "If you build it, they will come,"
holds true over and over again as we start to see some overdue care on the
Westside. Adding the full basketball court, along with the dual pickle ball and
tennis court (underway by the Public Lands Dept.) to this Park, will bring it to the
light it truly deserves. This project will fund the expansion of the court which
includes demolition, irrigation adjustments, a new concrete court, fencing,
signage (that would include a flower bed, which will provide beautification
opportunities for Friends of Poplar Grove Park to showcase their flower planting
skills over the years). Furthermore, it will also fund an artist to design and paint a
mural on the new court. Which will provide an opportunity for local artists to
share their talents with the community. There are so many benefits to this project -
it invites all to participate, enjoy and cherish this wonderful open space for many
years to come. COVID-19 may have been a hard time to deal with, but our parks
became the extension of our homes and will remain that way for a long
253,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 253,500$ 253,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 253,500$
11
Jordan Park and Peace Gardens Cultural Landscape Report and
Master Plan
Requested Funding: $200,000
This project will fund the development of a Cultural Landscape Report (CLR) for
the 33.5 acres of both Jordan Park and the International Peace Gardens. The CLR
will outline site history, elements and features that contribute to the historic and
cultural significance of the site, and recommendations to retain and enhance
these values. The CLR will inform and be followed by a Master Plan for the site.
The master plan will include potential recommendations for how and if Salt Lake
City should expand the Peace Gardens and increase amenities and programming
at Jordan Park. This funding will include robust community and stakeholder
engagement, visioning for both sites, as well as implementation strategies and
prioritization. Public Lands has received significant interest from stakeholders,
cultural associations and organizations, and individuals to expand the Peace
Gardens, which will require formal planning before proceeding with expansion.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 5
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
12
Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet
Requested Funding: $850,000
In November 2022, Public Lands acquired a property adjoining Cottonwood Dog
Park and the Jordan River located at 356 Redwood Road. The dirt lot has long
been used as an informal parking lot for dog park users, even prior to property
acquisition. This project would develop a trailhead and parking lot that better
serve the park’s current and future users. This site has the potential to better serve
as a gateway to the Jordan River Trail and to Cottonwood Park as a whole, with
interpretive signage, wayfinding, improved connectivity, landscaping, and a small
gathering space along the river. This would also provide lighting and artwork to
provide a welcoming space. This project also funds a new restroom facility to
replace the existing failing restroom.
202,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 648,000$ 202,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 648,000$
13
Three Creeks West - Roadways Addendum
Requested Funding: $850,000
At the urging and recommendation of Salt Lake City staff, this application comes
to rectify a miscalculation by the city in estimating the cost of the 2023 CIP "Three
Creeks West – Roadways" project, which calls for reconstructing about two blocks
of 1300 South and 1000 West beside the Jordan River. This Council-approved
project will install sanitary sewers, storm sewers, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
roadway reconstruction and all necessary infrastructure. None of this
infrastructure exists in this residential neighborhood, established in the 1920s to
1950s. The oldest house on the roadway was built in 1925 and mine was built in
1939. Installing sanitary sewers will enable removal of failing septic systems that
are leaching harmful E. coli into surface water, causing a health threat. This
project is endorsed by the Glendale Community Council and residents of all 25
homes on the roadways. Staff tell me the 2023 city-generated estimate for this
project fell short to cover costs, and $850,000 more is needed. The project was
approved by the CIP citizen advisory board, Mayor Erin Mendenhall, and ratified
in resolution by the City Council on Aug. 16, 2022.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
14
Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024
Requested Funding: $3,500,000
This annual program funds rehabilitation of deteriorated City streets, including
curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where
appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian
access improvements.
-$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,250,000$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 6
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
15
Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail
Requested Funding: $1,700,000
Two projects are critical to this urban trails request: connectivity for The Other
Side Village just west of Redwood Road, and a short gap in the 9-Line Trail near
the University of Utah. This request seeks funding for critical trail connections in
support of "The Other Side Village," the tiny home village with assistive services
that will be constructed just west of Redwood Road in the City's Glendale / Poplar
Grove neighborhoods. The Village is very near, but not yet connected to, key
resources including frequent transit service on Redwood Road; a new Transit Hub
approximately 1/3 mile directly north at Orange Street and 500 South; and the
existing 9-Line Trail (from Redwood Road to the University of Utah). A charter
school, Wallace Stegner Academy, also west of Redwood Road, is an additional
key destination to be served by these trails. $1.2 million will be allocated to begin
improvements, currently under study, which will prioritize a multi-use trail
and/or sidewalks on Indiana Avenue; safer crossings of Redwood Road; a new
multi-use trail north from the Village to the transit center; and/or segments of the
9-line trail and Surplus Canal Trail (see map). This is anticipated to be Phase 1 of
three or four requests. Funds will also be used for a missing gap in the 9-Line
Trail near the University of Utah, where the 12' wide multi-use trail along
Sunnyside Avenue narrows down to a scant 4' wide sidewalk, creating conflicts
between bicyclists and pedestrians. This segment was not able to be developed
during the initial trail construction due to a lack of easement from the property
owner; a portion of the $500,000 request will be used to secure that easement as
well as to construct the full width of trail.
-$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$
16
Rose Park and Jordan River Recreation Hub
Requested Funding: $459,000
The Public Lands Department has the opportunity to acquire the Rose Park Golf
Course driving range from its Golf Division for the purpose of improving more
equitably accessible public open space. This improvement would vastly expand
green space in the Rose Park and Westpointe areas. This project would fund
planning, community engagement, and conceptual design for the future driving
range site as well as the existing Roots Disc Golf Course as one cohesive recreation
hub. This hub would be the largest open space along the Jordan River within Salt
Lake City. This funding would not include the acquisition costs of the driving
range, only planning and conceptual design for that site. In addition, this project
would fund design and construction of specific site improvements identified in the
planning and engagement process at the Roots Disc Golf Course. This may include
irrigation modifications, additional trees, building upgrades, and naturalized
landscaping.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 7
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
17
Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom
Conceptual Design
Requested Funding: $75,000
Restroom safety and vandalism present ongoing problems in city parks, especially
the large, heavily used parks. Friends of Fairmont Park and other stakeholders
have raised this issue with Parks officials for some time. Friends of Fairmont
invited Parks to present ideas about restroom design on January 11, 2022 and
dialogue occurred regarding new designs that could reduce vandalism. We have
identified a key design flaw with how restrooms in the Parks are configured, and
that if addressed, can significantly reduce (but sadly not eliminate) problems. The
Fairmont Park Restroom Pilot CIP for 2022-23 proposes a (1) planning study to
update planning guidance for parks restroom policy and practice, (2) conceptual
design for a new restroom to be tested in Fairmont Park. It is expected that the
new design strategy will reduce vandalism and maintenance costs and increase
restroom uptime and safety. The intent is to benchmark a proposed new restroom
configuration against the current design in other parks, to test the viability of this
approach, developing best practice in park restroom management.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
18
Madsen Park Improvements
Requested Funding: $500,000
This project seeks to improve Madsen Park by increasing activation through
improving existing structures and adding new amenities in order to encourage
more visitation. The surrounding area is planned to increase in population from
apartments on and near North Temple. The improvements at the park would
improve the quality of life for all area residents. Improvements include
installation of new lighting, playground renewal, installation of a fenced dog park,
benches, a small pavilion, seating and signage.
Note that this park was selected a District Two location to receive funding from
the voter-approved Parks, Trails, & Open Space Bond
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
19
Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and
Amenities
Requested Funding: $855,000
This project will fund construction for restoring the courts and adding amenities
at the Fire Station No. 7 Tennis Park on 300 North (west of 1000 West). This
space is currently two failed tennis courts. One tennis court will be restored and
the other will be converted into two pickleball courts. The addition of two
pickleball courts is necessary to meet increasing demand for usable pickleball
courts throughout the city. There are currently no dedicated pickleball courts on
the westside. This project would also complete associated amenities on site as
funding is available such as court lighting, drinking fountains, and ADA access.
Public Lands is funding the design of the courts which will be completed in early
2023. This funding will go towards construction costs of the courts and other
associated amenities.
438,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 416,150$ 438,850$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 416,150$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 8
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
20
337 Park Development
Requested Funding: $550,000
337 Pocket Park was initially established as a community garden, but has since
been decommissioned as such due to adjacent higher density property
development to the south shading out agricultural potential. The parcel has since
been sitting vacant. This potential pocket park needs significant development in
order to add public land level of service to District 4. Funding would facilitate
public engagement, planning and design, and construction of the site. This project
is an expansion of a previously submitted constituent CIP application during the
FY22-23 cycle with the addition of Public Lands-supported direction for
implementation. Currently, a small portion of the parcel (nearest to 400 East) has
public art and plantings. This project would develop the remainder of the parcel.
Potential amenities and features of this site will be determined with public
engagement but could include an off-leash dog park, seating, and native plantings
appropriate for shaded areas. This property has been the subject of continuous
encroachments since the lot to the south of this parcel has been under
development. There have been inquiries about the 337 Park lot being reduced to
allow for access to the southern development. Because of the increased interest in
this lot and the threat to this valuable property in a low level-of-service area for
parks, it is critical for the development of this lot to move forward as quickly as
possible.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 9
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
21
Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements
Requested Funding: $840,000
There is a great need for improvements along Rose Park Ln. This project would
fund replacement of the failed trail, new and modified irrigation, and two solar
feedback speed limit signs. The Urban Forestry division has committed to
providing trees and installation at the new sites on Rose Park Lane. The trail work
would allow for significantly more trees in this area and would contribute overall
to a much more beautiful space. The entire stretch of Rose Park Ln is currently
covered in weeds and highly neglected. Part of it was irrigated 4-5 years ago for
the WestPointe run off ditch (large grassy area/detention basin at the corner of
Rose Park Ln and 1700N), but this irrigation was never extended for the
remainder of that stretch of road. This lane is highly visible from I-215 with large
volumes of traffic going to the beautiful soccer fields just a few feet up the road.
This has increased the traffic and speed of that traffic on Rose Park Ln. Safety is
an issue as cars will continue to use highway speeds down that road upward of 60
MPH. I believe that fixing the trail, planting trees with irrigation, and erecting
visible solar speed limit signs on Rose Park Ln would greatly improve community
morale and safety for the families that walk with their children and pets, and bike
and run on this trail. Adding trees and speed limit signs will also help in reducing
air pollution, high summer heat and traffic noise. I recommend solar radar
feedback speed limit signs to help slow down the traffic - one sign after the 2100N
Exit just beyond the RAC entrance of the RAC, and the other sign at 1700N
entrance. This area has been highly neglected for the last 17 years and continues
to see more and more traffic with less and less help or attention in the way of
beatification of a vital and thriving neighborhood. The $30,000 is for two driver
feedback speed signs.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
22
Richmond Park Community Playground
Requested Funding: $530,000
This project will replace one of the oldest playgrounds in the city located at
Richmond Park. Utilizing the existing playground space, this project would create
two play areas to cater towards younger and older children. This playground
would utilize larger equipment with more features to create more potential for
play and a higher level of service. The playground will incorporate accessible
design to be friendly and usable by a diversity of users of all abilities. This project
also includes removal and replacement of safety surfacing throughout the
playground site. The new community playground will provide an inviting and
engaging place for the Central City community to play while supporting resident
health and wellness. This community currently has the lowest level of park service
in our city and will significantly benefit from increased amenities. This
playground will further activate the park by adding in a place for children to play
while adults utilize the community garden. Public Lands has over 70 playgrounds,
and this project would address one of the highest needs in our system. The CIP
funding can be combined with the Council District Four reimagine neighborhood
parks funding from the voter approved Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 212,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 10
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
23
Rose Park Lane Open Space and Trail Connection Study
Requested Funding: $140,000
In summer 2022, City Council approved the rezone of four Public Lands parcels
on Rose Park Lane to Open Space. This project seeks funding to conduct a
planning, engagement, and conceptual design process on these four parcels,
totaling approximately 3.6 acres, for a new park/open space. This will include
evaluating different uses on site and conducting studies on completing the trail
connection through the open space. There is currently no sidewalk through these
parcels, and there are no other amenitized park spaces that directly service this
neighborhood. This project would fund initial studies to better inform a next
phase for design and construction of the open space. This project is closely
connected to the application "Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety
Improvements" which would complete landscaping and trail improvements on the
trail leading to the open space. This project also builds on Public Land's current
work to demolish the abandoned house on the property which is a very high
priority for the Westpointe community.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
24
Jefferson Park Improvements
Requested Funding: $530,000
Jefferson Park is an under-resourced jewel in the Ballpark Neighborhood. This
application seeks to address long standing issues identified in the City’s Ballpark
Station Area Plan, including “a lack of service and proper maintenance in current
parks”. The City and our residents have been discussing ways to improve the park
for years. The City notes that our neighborhood is “underserved for parks and
open space” and given the move to increase the density of housing in the area, we
can only anticipate more stressors. It is time to preserve and improve what we
already have. The park currently has a small, aging playground with two benches,
a set of temporary soccer nets, and an off leash dog area. We request the
following: Safety improvements: Ample, attractive 'dark sky' lighting throughout
the perimeter of the park and fencing around the playground area. Given the
area’s crime, this is essential. Health improvements: Permanent, attractive
garbage cans along the perimeter of the park to reduce the constant flow of
garbage (including clothing, needles and human waste), and to encourage
responsible dog ownership. Activation improvements: The retention pond berm is
an ideal location for a walking path around the park and provide residents a place
to exercise. Adding a few benches (with garbage cans) under the existing shade
trees, like in Liberty Park, will encourage activation.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 530,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 530,000$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 11
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
25
Parks Bilingual Signage Installation
Requested Funding: $414,000
This project will replace existing signage and add new bilingual signage in English
and Spanish in approximately ten parks citywide. This project will be the second
phase of implementation of the City's new multi-lingual signage standards. The
standards were completed in early 2022, with the first phase of implementation
occurring in 2022 and early 2023. The first phase of implementation included
these ten parks: Westpointe Park, Sunnyside Park, Pioneer Park, City Creek Park,
Poplar Grove Park, Cottonwood Park, Rotary Glen/Donner Trail Park, Jordan
Park, Riverside Park, Liberty Park. These parks were initially chosen because they
are classified as Community Parks in the Public Lands Master Plan, have
numerous and varying amenities, and lack effective signage types and locations
currently. Currently, many parks, natural areas and public spaces are not
adequately signed for appropriate and effective communication of public lands'
regulations, assets, amenities, and stories. This project would not only add
signage to parks with outdated or inadequate signage, but would add bilingual
information on all signs in order to enhance communication and provide public
lands information more equitably and reliably throughout Salt Lake City. The
project will also help the City accomplish the goals of the recently-adopted
Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan. While some of these parks are
classified as Neighborhood Parks, their size and varying amenities necessitate the
need for the addition of multiple signs that are not currently present in the park.
82,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 331,200$ 82,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 331,200$
26
Fairpark Traffic Circle Construction Phase
Requested Funding: $497,000
1000 West is an important street for the Fairpark neighborhood and access to the
Utah State Fairpark. Over the last two years, Salt Lake City Transportation
Division has engaged with the community about the challenges and opportunities
on 1000 West. Common requests for changes to 1000 West include slowing
vehicle speeds, making the crosswalks safer, improving street aesthetics, and
balancing regional access needs with neighborhood livability. This application is
requesting funds to build a traffic circle at the intersection of 1000 West and 500
North. This application is related to one submitted for FY23, that awarded funds
for study/design only. The Transportation Division is actively working on the
study/design while supporting this application for construction funds.
Intersection upgrades at 500 North is consistent with the 1000 West Corridor
Plan, which seeks to moderate vehicle speeds, improve walkability, add
landscaping, and create a gateway feature for the neighborhood.
-$ -$ 497,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 497,000$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 12
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
27
North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements
Requested Funding: $495,111
We are in need of many improvements in the area to make residents, workers and
visitors feel safe and welcomed, and for ease of getting to work safely and
efficiently. In addition, there is another emotional need that enhances people's
sense of enjoyment and quality of life for both residents and visitors. These much
needed enhancements include pedestrian safety improvements to include, but not
limited to: 1. Pedestrian-scale, decorative lighting on 800 West from North
Temple to dead end at approximately 150 South. 2. Potential for raised
crosswalks, RRFB(s), or other enhanced pedestrian crossing features 3.
ADA/sidewalk improvements as needed. The Secondary goal, which fulfills
emotional needs of the community and quality of life, would be to activate park
blocks, including but not limited to: 1. Amenities / improvements for southern
three park blocks, which includes the two closest to Folsom Trail and the third
(southern-most) at the dead end, which in theory has the lowest volume vehicle
traffic, (between 800 W. from North Temple to dead end at approximately 150 S.).
Park amenities could include: Benches, Bike racks, Interactive kids’ features,
Climbable public artwork, Other public artwork (Arts Council has agreed to work
with team and carry out City’s public art process for commission if any public
artwork funding is awarded). These improvements to 800 West will make it feel
welcoming, inclusive, and safe, especially after dark. These improvements will
also support activating an arts centered, vibrant Westside neighborhood. The CIP
funding can be combined with the $5 million to complete the Folsom Trail from
the first issuance of the voter approved Parks, Trails & Open Space Bond.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 192,689$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
28
Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024
Requested Funding: $250,000
This annual program, kicked off in 2021, funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of
deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as
necessary.
-$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 13
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
29
Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension
Requested Funding: $1,148,771
Originally constructed in 1994, Fire Station #1 was built to house the resources
(both human and mechanical) that were in use at the time. Since then, much of
our apparatus and equipment needs at this strategic location have changed,
requiring additional space. Fire Station #1 is located at 211 South 500 East. The
call volume for this station is consistently the highest in the city and has been
steadily increasing over the past five years. In fact, it recently came to the
attention of SLCFD Administration that the current call volume and projected
increase would be unsustainable for the single fire engine that was housed there.
In response, the Administration made the data-based decision to reassign existing
resources within the City, in an effort to alleviate the pressure on the fire crews
operating out of Station 1 Specifically, a fire truck was moved from Fire Station #5
to Fire Station #1, essentially repurposing Fire Station #1 to what is known in the
industry as a “dual-company house.” While this reassignment of resources has
certainly shown a more balanced delivery of emergency services, there are
logistical limitations affecting the housing of the newly assigned aerial apparatus.
The three newest and most advanced trucks are too long to be housed in the
apparatus bays at Fire Station #1. We have implemented the use of an older,
shorter aerial apparatus. In the meantime, we await the construction of a new,
smaller in length truck (not a standard build) which is anticipated to take 3-4
years. There is uncertainty that the manufacturer will be able to build this length
of truck in the future. As such, it is requested that funding be made available to
design and construct the expansion of four (4) apparatus bays at Fire Station #1.
1,148,771$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,148,771$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
30
Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24
Requested Funding: $1,700,000
Following a 10-year plan to eliminate the $45,600,000 in deferred asset renewal,
the Facilities Division will utilize the funds requested to replace assets that are
beyond their useful life, prioritizing assets based on their criticality.
1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 14
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
31
Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program
Requested Funding: $750,000
The Streets Division, part of Public Services will be the project sponsor and
implementation manager. Streets is requesting to begin a Mill & Overlay pilot
program, which is a more robust form of roadway surface treatment. Many
existing city roadways do not currently need a full depth reconstruction but are
not in good enough condition for current maintenance surface treatments, namely
chip and slurry seal. If nothing is done, these roads will deteriorate rapidly and
soon require expensive reconstruction. The Mill & Overlay program would allow
Streets to perform maintenance on these roads at a lower cost. These roads would
also then be eligible for chip & slurry surface treatments a few years down the
road. The combination of the Mill & Overlay program with chip and slurry surface
treatments would put off the need for full depth reconstruction of eligible roads
for many years to come, saving the City money and increasing the quality of City
roadways. To carry out this pilot program Streets needs two additional pieces of
equipment, an Asphalt Paver, and a Cold-Milling Machine. These machines would
also assist in other maintenance the division performs, as currently a cold milling
machine is rented for four months each year (when available) at an annual cost of
$70,000.
-$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 750,000$ -$ -$ -$
32
Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2
Requested Funding: $150,000
Design and construction of City staff recommendations on the project area’s six
local streets: Hollywood Avenue, Ramona Avenue, Garfield Avenue, Lincoln
Street, 1000 East, and McClelland Street. Continued funding on partially funded
CCIP, Sugar House Safe Side Streets, from FY 21/22. The Salt Lake City
Transportation Division has conducted a series of sessions with residents and
worked with a contracted Fehr & Peers consultant team. A recommendations
document with a draft traffic calming treatment design has been created and
shared with residents. This CCIP request seeks to fill the funding gap between
what has been awarded in previous years and what is required to complete the
infrastructure recommended for implementation in the plan.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 15
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
33
Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at
International Peace Gardens
Requested Funding: $325,000
The International Peace Gardens in District 2 receives hundreds of visitors per
day but contains much tired and dilapidated garden architecture. Hollows left by
stolen plaques and artwork everywhere remind visitors of theft and vandalism
and limit their understanding of the history and cultures behind the 28 national
garden exhibits. CIP funding is needed to replace or replicate, conserve, and
conceive a plan and trust fund for future upkeep of this trove of art, ethnic and
botanic diversity. Specific projects are listed in the budget narrative and will be
completed in priority order, if funded. Additionally, if funding is leveraged by
other sources, this funding would be used to complete additional projects. The
types of projects include: Security/GPS tracking chips for each asset, conservation
and restoration artworks, design and replacement of artwork that has been
removed/stolen, replacement of perennial botanicals and landscaping, structural
study and design exploring expansion of the greenhouse while assessing the
feasibility of a visitor space/exhibition space.
325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
34
Fred and Ila Rose Wetland Preserve Improvements
Requested Funding: $361,073
Improved public access for intended non-consumptive nature users through 1) the
installation of boulder manways at all three entrances, 2) complete removal of
dysfunctional Preserve-long split-rail fencing, 3) complete removal of rock-filled
gabion baskets at both pond-side access points, and 4) creation of sloped cracked
gravel beaches at both pondside access points. Installation of low fencing to newly
installed manways to help limit access to the Preserve at its two entrances at 1100
West. Installation of a low gate at its northwest entrance to allow for occasional
needed operations and maintenance by authorized vehicles. Design and
installation of a trash-rack in front of the wetland pond outlet to facilitate water
exchange while still allowing in-and-out migration of Jordan River wildlife,
especially fishes.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 16
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
35
75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement
Requested Funding: $400,000
Upgrade an aging traffic signal, along with parts of the surrounding intersection,
with safety and operational improvements for all modes. The typical life of a
traffic signal is 30 years. After that age, frequent repairs are needed, and the
structural supports for the traffic signal may be at risk of failing. Twenty traffic
signals in Salt Lake City are over 40 years old, with some of them rapidly
approaching 75 years old. This project will fund the design and construction to
replace one of the oldest and/or poorest condition traffic signals in Salt Lake City.
The project will replace and upgrade the signal with new steel poles, signal heads,
and detection, including current best practices for pedestrian detection and
design, pedestrian countdown timers, and motor vehicle left turn phasing, as
needed. It is anticipated that a traffic signal along 1300 East near the University of
Utah will be selected. Those traffic signals were constructed in 1948.
-$ -$ 360,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$ -$ -$ 360,000$ -$ 40,000$ -$
36
Park Strip, Median, Park Irrigation / Water Reduction Strategy and
Implementation
Requested Funding: $500,000
This project will explore different methods of transforming our medians, park
strips, and non-active park spaces to reduce the amount of water use in these
areas not used for active play. Our park strips, parks, and medians have a lot of
grass in them and we would like to have a consultant look at some areas in the
City and explore different alternatives to grass or different varieties of grass that
will reduce our water consumption. We would then use project funding to be able
to change several of these areas and help the City become a leader in transforming
these types areas to a better use of water in the City. There are a lot of park strips
in the City that are hard to irrigate, so let's try and turn them into something that
saves water and is still user friendly. We could also look at areas to be more of a
pollinator gardens to benefit the environment while being pleasing to the eye. We
would like to research what would be sustaining in our environment while not
being a burden on maintenance. It could be mulch, rock, different grasses the sky
is the limit. Let us be the innovators and help the City overcome our water woes
one park strip at a time.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 17
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
37
Liberty and Jordan Parks Greenhouses - Revisioned
Requested Funding: $242,823
Salt Lake City’s greenhouses located in Liberty (LPG) and Jordan (JPG) Parks are
showing signs of aging requiring repair and renovation to ensure they continue to
support the community’s horticultural, biodiversity, and conservation interests.
Part 1 – Structural audits of both facilities are planned to identify the type and
extent of repairs needed in order to ensure safe working conditions, compliance
with statutory regulations, and enhancing the building’s life cycle by identifying
both preventative and corrective actions to secure the properties. Part 2 –
Examines to what degree the current structure and any proposed renovations
support LPG’s and JPG’s mission statements. Part 2 includes a marketing study to
identify a) options to extend mission statements to include innovative
programs/activities of interest to the general public and/or that support the
development of new collaborative partnerships with other horticultural
institutions, and b) identify how to ‘scale up’ select activities/programs (e.g., aid
municipalities to promote biodiversity/sustainability) to address conservations
interests of a broader set of constituents in order to generate (consultation) self-
supporting revenues. Part 3 – Develops a plan, budget, and timetable to conduct a
collegiate case competition (in collaboration with the University of Utah’s College
of Architecture and Planning) to review/evaluate technical and aesthetic
proposals to guide LPG renovations per historical guidelines/updated mission.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
38
First Encampment Park
Requested Funding: $125,500
The Park is 26 years old & upgrades & improvements are needed to improve
safety & ensure continued usage. Goals include mending and upgrading the
sprinkler system and incorporating drip systems to reduce water waste & rock
erosion; improving drainage in the dry 'riverbed' to reduce standing water issues;
adding motion sensor lighting to improve safety and discourage criminal activity;
repairing damaged monuments to improve the perception that the park is valued;
replanting water-wise vegetation that has eroded to improve visibility within the
park; adding a more visible park sign; adding historical placards with added
context; repairing engraved pioneer names damaged by water on the rocks to
ensure continued historical value and work with new Park Rangers to share &
modernize accessible historical information.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 18
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
39
Indiana Avenue Area - Transit & Trail Connections
Requested Funding: $162,500
In October, the Salt Lake City Council approved The Other Side Village (TOSV)
pilot project, a tiny home community just west of Redwood Road on Indiana
Avenue. Also just west of Redwood Road, the Wallace Stegner Academy (WSA)
charter school, Riverbend Sports and Events Complex, and Vincit Amor Event
Center are all attracting families and individuals to the evolving, formerly-
industrial area. This request for design funding will follow on a Transportation
Division study, currently in progress, that is assessing the feasibility,
recommended phasing, and cost estimates for a suite of projects on either side of
Redwood Road, between 400 S and California Ave. This proposal seeks funds for
the design and permitting of three key elements to connect TOSV, WSA, and other
destinations to walking, biking, and transit options, and to existing infrastructure
such as the 9-Line Trail, a new transit hub opening in early 2023 at Orange Street
/ 500 S, and sidewalks on Redwood Road. • The design and environmental
assessment / permitting of a multi-use trail connection between The Other Side
Village development and the new transit hub. • The possible location of one or
more GREENbike stations connecting the village, the transit center, and bus stops
along Redwood Road. • The design of a signalized crossing of Redwood Road at
either Redwood Depot Lane (~950 S) and Redwood Rd or 1040 South and
Redwood Road. The final location will be decided in discussion with UDOT. This
signal may be a pedestrian and bicycle signal, or a full traffic signal. Future funds
will be sought for construction.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
40
Multimodal Capital Maintenance
Requested Funding: $200,000
These funds are for hiring contractors for specialized maintenance of
infrastructure for which SLC does not have the equipment or staff. Examples:
enhanced crosswalks, bike lanes, bike racks, colored pavement, delineators, radar
speed feedback signs, pedestrian warning flashers, bike racks, etc.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
41
700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding
Requested Funding: $4,000,000
This project will complete the last half mile of a 4.6 mile 700 South
reconfiguration from 25 Ft wide deteriorated asphalt road to a 50 FT wide
concrete street with bicycle lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and storm drainage
from Redwood Rd to 5600 West. Additional funding is needed to complete the
package for multiple reasons: a water main 1,300 feet long is required to be
replaced ($650,000); Styrofoam fill was proposed to mitigate settlement over the
water main as a cost savings method, however that proposal was rejected; Union
Pacific changed the City cost of the rail crossing from $400,000 to $1,200,000;
inflation has driven up the cost of construction.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 19
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
42
800 S 1000 E Crosswalk Upgrade
Requested Funding: $336,500
Every day throughout the day many parents, children and volunteers at Rowland
Hall, as well as students and families attending Judge Memorial and East High,
cross the busy intersection of 800 South 1000 East in conditions that are very
dangerous. We are asking for a HAWK style crosswalk system to replace the
existing rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) at this busy intersection. We
suggest moving the RRFBs to the next crosswalk to the west, at Lincoln St 800
South. In addition, the 1000 East crosswalk is in disrepair and we request it be
replaced with a colored concrete crosswalk. Drivers of vehicles speed up and down
800 South. The road has two lanes in each direction, eastbound and westbound
left turn lanes, and a deteriorated 4-foot median on the intersection's east side.
This crosswalk is also at the bottom of a hill that encourages westbound speeding
and challenges sightlines from both directions. Currently, there is a tree blocking
visibility for the cars driving westbound. There have been many near misses as
children cross one side in safety, only to be stranded in the middle of the street as
drivers from the other side blow through the intersection unaware that a student
has started to cross. Given all of these factors, a more visible way to highlight
pedestrians crossing the street, and ensure student and adult safety would be
greatly appreciated. We are asking for a HAWK style crosswalk system to better
protect children and families, moving the existing RRFBs to the next crosswalk to
the west (Lincoln St 800 South), and replacing the deteriorated crosswalk with a
colored concrete crosswalk
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
43
Central 9th Streetscape Improvements
Requested Funding: $85,000
The Central 9th Community Council is seeking CIP Funds to purchase and install
nine commercial trash receptacles to be located on 900 S, between West Temple
and 300 W. We are also seeking funding for banner arms to be attached to the
street lighting on 900 S between West Temple and 300 W and 200 W between
800 S and the 900 S freeway off-ramp for Central 9th branding banners. Also we
would like laser cut C9 logos to be attached to benches and planters along public
spaces on 900 S between West Temple and 200 W as well as 200 W between 800
S and the 900 S freeway off-ramp.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 20
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
44
Sugar House Community Map Project
Requested Funding: $93,400
Maps present information about the world in a simple, visual way. They are living
documents that inform, direct, and recognize a community’s open spaces, historic
buildings, public services, and points of interest. Sugar House is a special
community—a true inner-city that balances the needs of residents, visitors,
merchants, vendors, families, students, and others unlike any other region in Salt
Lake City. Strategically placed maps throughout Sugar House would inform and
direct pedestrians and cyclists, identify key locations in the community, provide
specific branding for Sugar House, and showcase pride for the sweetest
neighborhood in Utah. The Sugar House Community Map Project will install eight
(8) outdoor maps in the community. The maps will detail assets, historic
landmarks, public works, open spaces, places of interest, and walking/biking
paths. In addition, each map will include a QR code to connect with the Sugar
House Business Alliance.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
45
Phase I: Plaza 349 Life Safety, Security, and HVAC Upgrades
Requested Funding: $2,000,000
Plaza 349 is critical to the day to day operations of the city by hosting several key
departments including: Human Resources (HR), Engineering, Information
Management Services (IMS), Transportation, and Building Inspection divisions.
The city has commissioned a space planning and vulnerability study which
identified key elements to be updated including life safety, access controls, and
security. Facilities department has also identified key assets, including HVAC
system and parking structure, that require updating to ensure operation. This CIP
application is for the first phase of the project and will include upgrading life
safety, access controls, security, HVAC design, and key HVAC asset upgrades. The
estimated cost of the first phase is $2 million.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
46
Implementation of Safety Enhancements West Side Foothill Drive
Requested Funding: $494,126
Building safer intersections for pedestrians and cyclists at major Foothill Drive
intersections. In 2017 the Foothill Drive Implementation Strategy was completed
with community input and professional planners. Since then little has been done
to address the safety issues and solutions suggested in the plan. Residents and
users of this corridor are seeking funds to implement changes along the west side
at intersections between Bryan Avenuye and 2600 East.The most important
intersection is 2500 East and Blaine Avenue near the Beacon Heights Elementary
School. The $170,000 is for Blaine Avenue and 2500 East.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 170,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 21
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
47
Reimagining 4th & 4th (4th West & 4th North)
Requested Funding: $100,000
4th (N) & 4th (W) is a critical piece of the Capitol Hill-Marmalade neighborhood
infrastructure. A redesign of the intersection and the evolving 400 N and 400 W
corridors has the potential to connect residents and visitors with the rich social
infrastructure of the neighborhood. The proposed study is intended to create and
improve community gathering places and develop safe, efficient, green, and
pleasing neighborhood-wide connections for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users,
and vehicle drivers.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
48
11th Ave Park Pavilion, Trees, and Benches
Requested Funding: $533,165
Install a new medium sized pavilion for shade and provide a gathering place for
families, friends and neighbors. It will be located near the sports fields and north
of the parking area, and would be large enough for six picnic tables and provide
space for several groups to gather in the shade. Seating: The views from 11th
Avenue Park are outstanding, however, there are few places to sit. Seating would
be added at the top of the two slopes and adjacent to looped path. Backless
benches will allow for viewing either the sports fields, the tennis or the valley
below. Landscape enhancements: Increase the number of shade trees in the area
near the playground, pavilion, and sports fields. Increased shade will offer refuge
for spectators and families with small children. It is also critical to have trees of
different age classes to create a healthy urban forest. Concrete Pad: With
destination level recreation amenities there is a need to provide restrooms during
the peak-use seasons. Seasonal demand can be met with portable units. A
concrete pad near the entrance would make the park more usable for all who use
the park.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
49
New Liberty Park Crosswalks and Trails
Requested Funding: $262,000
Two proposed crosswalks across 500 E along with new sidewalks connecting to
the Liberty Park sidewalk loop. One crosswalk would connect Edith Ave to Liberty
Park, and one would connect Williams Ave to Liberty Park. These new crosswalks
would benefit the local community by a) increasing pedestrian access to Salt Lake
City’s flagship park, b) reducing speed on 500 E by adding visual friction to the
road, and c) improving pedestrian safety by allowing people to avoid crossing at
busy intersections.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 22
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
50
Sunnyside and Arapeen Signal & Safety Improvements
Requested Funding: $450,000
The intersection at Sunnyside/Arapeen represents a significant impediment to
traffic entering the Research Park area and creates traffic congestion that impacts
the neighborhood adjacent to Sunnyside Avenue and to Foothill Drive. This
volume of left-turning traffic would justify adding a new left-turn lane.
Additionally, the 9-Line Trail (Sunnyside Trail) is on the north side of the
roadway, and vehicles that make a westbound to northbound left-turn conflict
with trail users in an unsafe manner. This project seeks to address these issues
through the use of a technology called a "Flex Lane". This relatively new signal
technology would allow one of the westbound through lanes to be converted to a
shared left-through lane during this morning rush hour, resulting in less
congestion and less frustration for residents in the area. In this way, we can use
technology to avoid widening the roadway for a dual left and maximize the facility
we already have. This technology has recently been employed by UDOT at the
intersection of South Temple / State Street for people making a southbound left
turn and has resulted in improved conditions in that area. The added benefit of
this change would be that we could modify the signal phasing so that when the
trail through traffic has a green light, no left turns are permitted. When the left
turning traffic has a green arrow, trail users would be stopped. We are also
planning some additional bike infrastructure at the intersection. In order to
complete this project, it would be necessary to completely rebuild the signal as
well as the pavement in the intersection, which is in a failed condition. The project
is also planned to include several complete street enhancements to the crosswalks
and bike lanes at the intersection.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
51
Wasatch Hollow Park: Engagement, Planning & Restoration
Requested Funding: $500,000
The Wasatch Hollow Community Council (WHCC) has been collaborating with
SLC Public Lands regarding critical improvements to Wasatch Hollow Park. As a
response to growing concerns about safety, degradation of the park, and non-
compliance with posted off-leash dog guidelines, SLC Public Lands conducted a
survey in August of residents. The survey sought input on off-leash dog use and
other activities at the park, with the goal of serving a diverse and inclusive
community of park users. The WHCC is considering the survey results and other
community inputs, and intends to submit recommendations to the City. This
project would fund a planning and engagement process at Wasatch Hollow park
to identify capital improvements that are well supported by the surrounding
community and address existing challenges at the park, specifically related to off-
leash dogs and activation. The resulting plan is expected to include
recommendations for better separation of the off-leash dog area and the creation
of other active and passive use areas where dogs are not allowed to be off-leash,
new landscaping and restoration of the field. Remaining funding would then be
used for design and construction of plan recommendations.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 23
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
52
Hansen Ave - West Entrance/Exit
Requested Funding: $470,703
Purchase a small portion of private property at approximately 400 West Hansen
Ave to create a second (west) access point for Hansen Ave. Initial contact with the
property owner indicates that they would be amenable to having the conversation
about selling this property. Would include upgrading the property to City
standards for a public road. This would convert this current street from a dead
end street to one with two access points. There would be many benefits both
public and private for this change. As detailed later in this application in more
detail. A brief overview is as follows: Currently Hansen Ave (1650 South 300
West) enters and exists about 120 feet from a very busy intersection - 1700
South/300 West. This creates a lot of congestion along with several other
problems. Emergency vehicle (Fire trucks/ambulances) access would be
significantly improved. City Maintenance (snowplowing) would be significantly
improved. Garbage collection would be significantly improved. Freight and
package delivery for the existing businesses and the soon to be 175 new residents
would significantly improved.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
53
Nevada Street Reconstruction
Requested Funding: $479,000
Rebuild Nevada St running from Redondo Ave north to Garfield.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
54
Sunnyside Pickleball Courts
Requested Funding: $500,000
Idea 1 - Sunnyside 4/6 Pickleball courts at Sunnyside Park on 800 South. Like to
incorporate the best elements of all the pickle courts that I have visited in the SLC
area. Ideal court location would be just south of the existing pavilion near the
parking lot. This an older affluent area that would benefit from the following
elements: Tall perimeter fencing to retain the ball within the courts, short fencing
separating the internal courts, Sitting or bench area, covered, Night Lights,
Flagging above to shade from sun, Paddle Rack system (like Fairnont court),
Placard/signage that describes court rules, Court location will not infringe on the
3 existing large fields on the west side of the park used for football and lacrosse,
nor the baseball fields on the north side, New Courts in this location will require:
Removal of the vollyeball standards, never used, Removal or replanting of trees...
Planting should be planted to strategically create shade for waiting players
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
55
1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk
Requested Funding: $351,000
Install curb and gutter on east side of road, and curb, gutter, and sidewalk on west
side of road on 1200 East between Zenith Ave. and Crandall Ave.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 24
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
56
Salt Lake City Pétanque
Requested Funding: $500,000
I was National champion in a sport called petanque in 2019. Our national
organization wanted us to put out bids. So I did and they got rejected as we don't
have a facility to hold national tournaments. We are a growing sport and even had
a medal winner on the last world games in Atlanta. What we ask for is a venue so
we can practice. That way we can get national tournaments to Salt lake City. In
almost every park, we see bocce courts but I never seen any bocce players. We are
starting to grow as a sport and would love to have our own location. This project is
proposing the addition of 16 Petanque courts, along with shade structures and
seating at Rosewood Park.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
57
Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements
Requested Funding: $210,000
Ensign Nature Park attracts thousands of visitors at all hours of day and night.
However, the park was not designed to handle the volume of traffic it receives,
and it shows; the park lacks adequate facilities for visitors (no water or
bathrooms), has heavily eroded trails and is not designed to manage the visitor
volume. The increase in popularity of the park in recent years has come at
considerable cost to the residents in the area - traffic, noise, littering and crime.
Most of this adverse impact to the community is at night. The goal of this project
is to reduce the impact to the community and be a first step towards enabling the
park to be improved over the long-term. Before any other improvements can be
sustainably made to the park, we need to limit late night access to the park, for the
following reasons: 1) The impact on the community is severe - the late night
crowd is loud - drinking, playing loud music, driving loudly, etc at all hours of the
day -- it is common for significant numbers of people to be there even at 3am.
They frequently leave beer bottles, fast food containers and other trash on
neighboring lawns. 2) Public safety - there have been dangerous fires caused by
night time visitors to the park at least twice, and firearms have been discharged at
least twice in the last 2 years in the area by nighttime visitors. I propose we
address this by building a fence with a full-height turn-locking turnstile and ADA
gate at the park entrance, so the park can be locked between hours that the city
and community agree is reasonable. Many residents in the area are willing to be
volunteers to help with unlocking and locking the gate at night, and generally be
stewards of the park. Improved lighting and landscaping in this area will further
deter after-hours activity.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 210,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
58
11th Avenue Park Pickleball Expansion
Requested Funding: $502,500
Expand 11th Avenue Park pickleball courts by 4 more pickleball courts (6 current
dedicated courts to a total of 10 dedicated courts), with fencing. This proposal also
includes creating lines on the 2 tennis courts closest to the pickleball courts to be
used by pickleball players if all pickleball courts are in use. This project also
includes new signage: number the courts; queuing expectations and paddle
holders; court rules.
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 25
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
1/4 Cent
Sales Tax
Class C
(gas tax)
Impact
Fees
Parks
Impact
Fees
Council Funding Allocations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources Parks
Impact
Fees
#Project Description
Board and Mayoral Funding Recommendations
General
Fund
Funding
Our
Future
Transportation Dedicated Sources
59
Westside Art Project
Requested Funding: $150,000
Not presented to CDCIP Board. Could be combined with or separate from the
$150,000 for new art in the 9-Line RDA Project Area which was approved as part
of the FY2024 annual budget.
-$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$
60
Maintenance of Vacant City-owned Property
Requested Funding: $500,000
Not presented to CDCIP Board. $200,000 is separately approved with the annual
budget for security and utilities at vacant City-0wned properties. The Council
approved $700,000 last fiscal year of which $598,698 remains available. The
Administration identified five projects with a total cost of $550,000 to use the
FY2023 funding. Projects have not yet been identified for the $500,000 in new
funding for FY2024 (would not lapse to Fund Balance). The five projects using the
FY2023 funds are:
- $100,000 at the Former Public Safety Building (PSB)
- $200,000 for a Development Strategy and Spacing Needs Study
- $100,000+ additional Funding for Major Renovations to the Annex building
Leased by Odyssey House
- $100,000 for Maintenance of City-owned Buildings Leased to Third Parties
- $50,0000 for Pre-development Work at the Fleet Block and former Public Safety
Building (PSB)
500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
61
Urban Trails Maintenance
Requested Funding: $200,000
Not presented to CDCIP Board. Proposed as a new item that would be base
funding ongoing annually. These funds will be used for repaving, crack and seal
repair, bridge re-decking, bridge replacements, trail shoulder surfacing, snow
removal, debris removal on urban paved trails. Project locations include the
Jordan River Parkway, 9Line Trail, Folsom Trail. Short description: These funds
will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails
and trail segments that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The
maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe for all that use them
and so they can be used year-round
-$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$
8,284,921$ 3,240,000$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ 8,899,610$ 3,884,126$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$
AVAILABLE FUNDING BY SOURCE 8,484,921$ 3,240,000$ 7,500,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$ 8,899,610$ 3,884,126$ 7,700,000$ 3,500,000$ 240,000$ 2,728,850$
AVAILABLE FUNDING LESS TOTALS 200,000$ -$ (200,000)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Note: Council changes to funding and project descriptions / scopes are shown in blue
TOTALS
Fiscal Year 2024 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log
Last Updated August 8, 2023 Page 26
Mayor’s Recommended
Capital Improvement
Program Budget
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
CIP SUMMARY DOCUMENTS Page:
FY 2023-24 PROJECTS OVERVIEW 1
FY 2023-24 CAPITAL PROJECTS SUMMARY 5
DEBT SERVICE CIP
DEBT SERVICE CIP 19
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES 22
GENERAL FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning 27
Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide 28
200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements 29
Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments 30
Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide 31
Public Way Concrete 2023/2024 32
Livable Streets Implementation 33
Neighborhood Byways 34
Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024 35
Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 36
Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 37
Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024 38
Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail 39
Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 40
337 Park Development 41
Jefferson Park Improvements 42
Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 43
Fairpark Traffic Circle Construction Phase 44
Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024 45
Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension 46
Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24 47
Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program 48
Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens 49
75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 50
Westside Art 51
Cost Overrun 52
Percent for Art 53
ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS
AIRPORT CAPITAL PROJECTS
CUP Crossover Piping 58
Decommission R/W 14-32 & T/W Improvements (Design)59
Table of Contents
Replace Pumps in Glycol Pumps Stations 60
Taxiway F Reconstruction (G - F1) - (Construction)61
Taxiway U & V Proper (Design)62
Taxiway U & V Tunnel & Roadway Realignment 63
UPS Pump Station Replacement 64
Demo Row 21 - Apron & Taxiway Reconstruction 65
SVRA Hangar Site Development - Phase I 66
TVY Water & Sewer Improvements 67
Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations FY24 68
S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Design)69
S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Construction)70
AOC Backup Generator 71
Demo FAA FMP and Construct New Roadway 72
NS1 & NS4 Switch Gear & Capacitor 73
NWS Replacement Controls 74
GOLF CAPITAL PROJECTS
Tee Box Leveling 76
Pump Replacement 77
Maintenance Equipment 78
Parking Lot Resurfacing 79
Property Fencing Project 80
New Construction Projects 81
Irrigation Improvements 82
Cart Path Improvements 83
PUBLIC UTILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS
Water Main Replacements 86
Treatment Plant Improvements 87
Deep Pump Wells 88
Meter Change-Out Program 89
Water Service Connections 90
Storage Reservoirs 91
Pumping Plants & Pump Houses 92
Culverts, Flumes & Bridges 93
Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)94
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)95
Treatment Plants 96
Collection Lines 97
Lift Stations 98
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)99
Storm Drain Lines 100
Riparian Corridor Improvements 101
Landscaping 102
Table of Contents
Storm Water Lift Stations 103
Detention Basins 104
Street Lighting Projects 105
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CAPITAL PROJECTS
City Creek Daylighting 108
Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank
CIP Summary
Documents
This page intentionally left blank
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Introduction and Overview
Salt Lake City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning program of capital expenditures needed
to replace or expand the City’s public infrastructure. The principal element that guides the City in determining the
annual infrastructure improvements and budgets schedule is the current fiscal year capital budget.
The City CIP Budget Process includes a review by the Community Development & Capital Improvement Program
(CDCIP) Board, consisting of community residents from each district. The CDCIP Board scores projects on a variety
of criteria and provides funding recommendations to the Mayor.
The Mayor considers the CDCIP recommendations as the Administration prepares its funding recommendations for
the City Council as part of the Annual Recommended Budget. The City Council reviews the recommendations of the
Mayor and the CDCIP Board and carefully analyzes each of the proposed projects before allocating funding and
adopting the final CIP budget. The details of the recommended FY2023-24 CIP Budget are included in this book.
In considering major capital projects, the City looks at the potential operating impact of each project. New capital
improvements often entail ongoing expenses for routine operations. Upon completion or acquisition, the repair and
maintenance of new facilities often require additional positions to maintain the new infrastructure. Conversely, a
positive contribution, such as a reduction in ongoing repairs and maintenance of a capital project, is factored into
the decision-making process.
Each project includes a section for estimated future maintenance and/or operations expenses, where the
departments have included projections of any increases to future operating costs.
The City also reviews all CIP projects to determine the progress. All projects older than three years that do not show
significant progress are then considered for recapture, allowing those funds to be used on more shovel-ready
projects. The Administration continuously evaluates the City’s funding of its Capital Improvement Program. Because
the proceeds from debt financing are considered a source for funding the City’s capital improvement projects, the
City analyzes the effect that issuance of additional debt would have on its debt capacity and current debt ratio.
Salt Lake City Resolution No. 29 of 2017 / Salt Lake City Council Capital and Debt Management
Policies
Resolution No. 29 of 2017 provides the framework for project funding recommendations. Its guidance helps clarify
the expectations of the City’s Capital Improvement Program and the steps the Administration should take in
determining how to best address the City’s deferred and long-term maintenance needs.
Some of the policies guiding the CDCIP Board and the Administration include:
–A definition of a capital improvement as having a useful life of five or more years and cannot have a
recurring capital outlay such as a motor vehicle or a fire engine. It also clarifies that a capital outlay does not
include maintenance expenses such as fixing a leaking roof or painting park benches.
–A capital improvement must be a City asset and have a cost of $50,000 or more, with few exceptions.
–Salt Lake City aims to maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect its capital investments and
minimize maintenance and replacement costs.
–Priorities are given to projects that preserve and protect the health and safety of the community; are
mandated by the state and/or federal government; and provide for the renovation of existing facilities
resulting in the preservation of the community’s prior investment.
–The recapture of Capital Improvement Program funds during the first budget amendment of each year if an
existing balance remains on a completed project.
–Debt Service (excluding G.O. Bonding).
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
1 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Allocations
Salt Lake City’s FY2023-24 adopted CIP budget appropriates $545,012,942 for CIP, utilizing General Funds, Class “C”
Funds, Impact Fee Funds, Quarter Cent Tax Funds, Redevelopment Agency Funds, Enterprise Funds, and other
public and private funds.
The City’s General Fund accounts for all debt service on outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds through a
payment from the City CIP contribution, except for the Eccles Theater project. The Library Fund covers the Local
Building Authority Lease Revenue bonds for Glendale and Marmalade Libraries while debt associated with the
construction of two fire stations is funded through CIP. Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds are funded through
the City’s Class C Road fund. Funds to pay debt service, equaling $11,482,326, are included in the adopted annual
budget.
Outstanding Sales and Excise Tax Revenue bonds financed a variety of the City’s capital improvement projects.
Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue bonds funded the reconstruction of Class C roads throughout the City.
A total of $10,274,000 was recommended for Transportation projects. Of this amount, the budget appropriates
$1,194,000 of General Funds, $240,000 of Impact Fee funds, $2,090,000 of Funding our Future funds, and
$6,750,000 in ¼ Cent Tax funding. Programs funded include Safer Crossings, Sidewalk Improvements, Frequent
Transit Routes, Complete Streets, Livable Streets, Neighborhood Byways, Urban Trails, Traffic Circle Construction,
and Traffic Signal Replacement.
The recommended budget for Parks, Trails, and Open Space capital improvement projects includes a total
appropriation of $4,221,000 from the General Fund and Parks Impact Fee funds. Projects funded include Library
Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning, Park Development and Improvements, Bilingual Signage Installation, and
Park Restoration and Conservation.
Public Services capital improvement recommended budget includes a total appropriation of $10,348,771. Of this
amount, the budget appropriates $4,598,771 from the General Fund, $3,500,000 of Class C funding, $1,000,000 of
Funding our Future funds, $750,000 in ¼ Cent Tax funding, and $500,000 of CIP funding. Programs funded include
Public Way Concrete, Complete Streets Reconstruction and Overlay, Alleyway Improvements, Mill and Overlay
Maintenance Pilot, and the Facilities Asset Renewal Plan. An apparatus bay extension project was also funded for
Fire Station #1.
A total of $150,000 was also recommended for a Westside Art Project from Funding our Future funds.
Capital Projects
The CIP pages include details for each recommended project for the FY2023-24 Budget. These pages provide a
breakout of the funding recommendations and future costs associated with each project. The total for capital
projects in the FY2023-24 budget is $24,993,771.
Enterprise Fund Projects
The City’s enterprise functions; Airport, Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Redevelopment, Refuse Collection and Golf –
are by nature, very capital intensive. The budgets for these activities reflect the need to maintain the integrity and
capacity of the current capital infrastructure and its functionality.
Airport Fund – The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive
any general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of Airports (the
Airport) has 639 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing, and promoting airports
that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel experience.
The Fiscal Year 2024 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures. The Salt
Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) continues to benefit from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) as well as the
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants awarded for FY2024. The Airport will use the remaining funds in the ARPA
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
2 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
grants which will help offset operating and maintenance expenses that will lower the landing fee and terminal rents
charged in FY24 as well as make up for lost revenues. The BIL grants will continue to provide much needed and
critical funding for airport capital infrastructure projects that are moving from design into actual construction. The
Airport will be bringing on 22 gates located on South Concourse East (SCE) in October 2024 which brings additional
staffing and maintenance staff requirements while seeing a significant reduction in the hardstand operations.
The developed FY24 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers and revenues
that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important capital projects. These
projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRP) and the North Concourse Program (NCP), which
together are called the New SLC. In addition, critical projects found in the airfield, terminal, and auxiliary airports
will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support
the growth we are currently experiencing as well as the growth we are projecting into future years.
Public Utilities Funds – Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities: water,
sewer, storm water, and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not
used to fund these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue
bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government subsidized loan. The department is utilizing a Water
Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation facility
construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been established for each
fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are infrastructure intensive and
administration of these assets requires long term project and financial planning.
The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year 2024, the
department has over 95 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on existing projects.
Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common for projects to be designed in
one year and constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes projects rated as a high priority in the
Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water reclamation facility is the largest project
undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also experiencing aging problems and will require
increasing attention in the future. For example, our three water treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early
60’s. Planning is underway for each of the three plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement. A
unique aspect of capital projects in SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities.
Adding to the complexity are water rights and exchange agreement obligations.
RDA Funds – The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial
districts to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA
utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that enhance the
City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental sustainability. The RDA’s primary
source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and program income revenue, depending on the
specific budget account.
The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned infrastructure
projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that anticipates multi-year
funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval process and is typically contingent
on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific project costs and details are known. Depending on
the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The RDA fiscal year 2024 budget process proposes one potential City infrastructure project. The City Creek
daylighting design plan explores bringing a portion of City Creek that currently runs in a culvert underground up to
the surface just north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. The project goals include increasing access
to nature, improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding. This $50,000 funding request will produce final
construction drawings which will be used for project implementation. Landscaping improvements and other
pedestrian amenities will also be recommended as a part of the design plan to activate the trail and create a
welcoming centerpiece for the westside community. The total cost for implementation is estimated to be between
$15,000,000 and $20,000,000.
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
3 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Sustainability Fund - Sustainability operations enable continuing compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations related to landfill gas collection, closing portions of the landfill, and constructing a new landfill cell within
the permitted footprint included in the master plan. Sustainability proposed no projects for FY 2023-24.
Golf Fund - The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality
recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding cities and
various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess revenue generated by
user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have limited Golf’s ability to self-fund
most if not all non-emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund was established that allocates $1 per every 9
holes played and 9% from all annual pass sales toward building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital
Projects. Until FY 2019, these funds had not been released for use as the fund balance was needed to provide a
fund balance offset against a fund deficit. As part of the FY22 budget proposal, the Golf Division implemented a Golf
CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2 per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital
into the Golf CIP Fund to increase funding from this source for additional future projects.
The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing funds into
long-overdue projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $6,610,220 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY24. The Golf Division is
undertaking a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of the tee
box areas at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY24 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf Division is
undertaking a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts paths and has allocated
$525,000 for FY24. Other significant projects include new parking lot resurfacing at the Mountain Dell and driving
range hitting facility at Glendale golf course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using
$424,263 in FY24 to purchase additional equipment.
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
4 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Debt Service Projects
Sales Tax Series 2013B Bond $ 362,950 $ 362,950
Sales Tax Series 2014B Bond $ 747,025 $ 747,025
Sales Tax Series 2016A Bond $ 2,003,973 $ 2,003,973
Sales Tax Series 2019A Bond $ 358,575 $ 358,575
Sales Tax Series 2022B Bond $ 1,999,625 $ 1,999,625
Sales Tax Series 2022C Bond $ 3,088,875 $ 3,088,875
B & C Roads Series 2014 $ 979,503 $ 979,503
ESCO Debt Service to Bond $ 761,000 $ 761,000
Fire Station #3 $ 679,400 $ 679,400
Fire Station #14 $ 501,400 $ 501,400
Debt Service Projects Total $ 10,301,526 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,180,800 $ 11,482,326
On
g
o
i
n
g
Ongoing Projects
Crime Lab $ 600,000 $ 600,000
Facilities Maintenance $ 350,000 $ 350,000
Trail Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Public Lands Maintenance $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Ongoing Projects Total $ 1,200,000 $ — $ — $ — $ 200,000 $ — $ 1,400,000
Ot
h
e
r
O
n
g
o
i
n
g
Other Ongoing
Community and Neighborhoods - Surplus Land RES
$ 700,000 $ 700,000
Public Services- Smiths Ballfield $ 150,000 $ 150,000
Public Services- ESCO County Steiner
$ 150,500 $ 150,500
Public Services - Memorial House $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Other Ongoing $ 700,000 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 350,500 $ 1,050,500
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
5 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Ne
w
C
I
P
New/Maintenance Projects Total
Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning
$ 190,000 $ 190,000
Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide
$ 270,000 $ 90,000 $ 540,000 $ 900,000
200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements
$ 234,000 $ 234,000
Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments
$ 990,000 $ 110,000 $ 1,100,000
Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide
$ 3,293,000 $ 3,293,000
Public Way Concrete 2023/2024
$ 750,000 $ 750,000
Livable Streets Implementation $ 250,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,350,000
Neighborhood Byways $ 440,000 $ 360,000 $ 800,000
Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024
$ 2,250,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 4,500,000
Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion
$ 253,500 $ 253,500 $ 507,000
Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet
$ 202,000 $ 648,000 $ 850,000
Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024
$ 1,250,000 $ 1,250,000
Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail
$ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000
Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities
$ 438,850 $ 416,150 $ 855,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
6 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Ne
w
C
I
P
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
337 Park Development $ 550,000 $ 550,000
Jefferson Park Improvements $ 530,000 $ 530,000
Parks Bilingual Signage Installation
$ 82,800 $ 331,200 $ 414,000
Fairpark Traffic Circle Construction Phase
$ 497,000 $ 497,000
Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension
$ 648,771 $ 500,000 $ 1,148,771
Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24
$ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000
Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program
$ 750,000 $ 750,000
Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens
$ 325,000 $ 325,000
75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement
$ 40,000 $ 360,000 $ 400,000
Westside Art $ 150,000 $ 150,000
New Projects Total $ 7,284,921 $ 3,240,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,968,850 $ 7,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 24,993,771
Cost Overrun $ 22,214 $ 225,357 $ 247,571
Percent for Art $ 161,518 $ 161,518
Total General Fund/Other Fund/Class C Fund/Impact Fee Fund/Surplus Land Fund CIP Projects
$ 19,508,661 $ 3,626,875 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,968,850 $ 7,700,000 $ 2,031,300 $ 39,335,686
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
7 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
Airport CIP Projects
CUP Crossover Piping $ 505,000 $ 505,000
Decommission R/W 14-32 & T/W Improvements (Design)
$ 405,000 $ 405,000
Replace Pumps in Glycol Pumps Stations
$ 967,000 $ 967,000
Taxiway F Reconstruction (G - F1) - (Construction)
$ 9,400,000 $ 9,400,000
Taxiway U & V Proper (Design)$ 4,725,000 $ 4,725,000
Taxiway U & V Tunnel & Roadway Realignment
$ 78,651,000 $ 78,651,000
UPS Pump Station Replacement $ 1,483,000 $ 1,483,000
Demo Row 21 - Apron & Taxiway Reconstruction
$ 1,613,000 $ 1,613,000
SVRA Hangar Site Development - Phase I
$ 2,721,000 $ 2,721,000
TVY Water & Sewer Improvements
$ 9,046,000 $ 9,046,000
Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations FY24
$ 1,068,000 $ 1,068,000
S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Design)
$ 1,559,000 $ 1,559,000
S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Construction)
$ 60,808,000 $ 60,808,000
AOC Backup Generator $ 311,000 $ 311,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
8 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Demo FAA FMP and Construct New Roadway
$ 1,044,000 $ 1,044,000
NS1 & NS4 Switch Gear & Capacitor $ 1,063,000 $ 1,063,000
NWS Replacement Controls
$ 624,000 $ 624,000
Total Airport CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 175,993,000 $ 175,993,000
Go
l
f
Golf CIP Projects
Tee Box Leveling $ 60,000 $ 60,000
Pump Replacement $ 20,000 $ 20,000
Maintenance Equipment $ 424,263 $ 424,263
Parking Lot Resurfacing $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Property Fencing Project $ 55,220 $ 55,220
New Construction Projects $ 1,300,000 $ 1,300,000
Irrigation Improvements $ 4,400,000 $ 4,400,000
Cart Path Improvements $ 525,000 $ 525,000
Total Golf CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 7,034,483 $ 7,034,483
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
9 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Pu
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Public Utilities CIP Projects
Water Main Replacements $ 14,620,000 $ 14,620,000
Treatment Plant Improvements $ 38,340,000 $ 38,340,000
Deep Pump Wells $ 100,000 $ 100,000
Meter Change-Out Program $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000
Water Service Connections $ 3,450,000 $ 3,450,000
Storage Reservoirs $ 6,690,000 $ 6,690,000
Pumping Plants & Pump Houses $ 900,000 $ 900,000
Culverts, Flumes & Bridges $ 4,200,000 $ 4,200,000
Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)$ 2,300,000 $ 2,300,000
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)
$ 400,000 $ 400,000
Treatment Plants $ 212,259,773 $ 212,259,773
Collection Lines $ 23,955,000 $ 23,955,000
Lift Stations $ 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000
Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)
$ 350,000 $ 350,000
Storm Drain Lines $ 6,230,000 $ 6,230,000
Riparian Corridor Improvements $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Landscaping $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Storm Water Lift Stations $ 650,000 $ 650,000
Detention Basins $ 365,000 $ 365,000
Street Lighting Projects $ 2,240,000 $ 2,240,000
Total Public Utilities CIP Projects
$—$—$—$—$—$322,599,773 $322,599,773
RD
A
Redevelopment Agency (RDA) CIP Projects
City Creek Daylighting $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Total RDA CIP Projects $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
10 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Sustainability CIP Projects
No Projects $ —
Total Sustainability CIP Projects
$ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Total Enterprise and Other Fund CIP
$ 505,677,256 $ 505,677,256
GRAND TOTAL $ 19,508,661 $ 3,626,875 $ 3,500,000 $ 2,968,850 $ 7,700,000 $ 507,708,556 $ 545,012,942
Salt Lake City
General Fund / Class C / Impact Fee / Enterprise Fund / Other CIP Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT GF GF FOF CLASS C IMPACT FEES ¼¢ SALES TAX OTHER TOTAL
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
11 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Salt Lake City
Impact Fee Summary
Fiscal Year 2024
PROJECT Street Impact Fees Parks Impact Fees TOTAL
Impact Fee Projects
Im
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide $ 90,000 $ — $ 90,000
Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments $ 110,000 $ — $ 110,000
Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion $ — $ 253,500 $ 253,500
Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet $ — $ 648,000 $ 648,000
Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities $ — $ 416,150 $ 416,150
337 Park Development $ — $ 550,000 $ 550,000
Jefferson Park Improvements $ — $ 530,000 $ 530,000
Parks Bilingual Signage Installation $ — $ 331,200 $ 331,200
75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement $ 40,000 $ — $ 40,000
Total Impact Fee by Type $ 240,000 $ 2,728,850 $ 2,968,850
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
12 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Salt Lake City Unfunded Projects Fiscal Year 2024
Un
f
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Public Lands Jordan Park and Peace Gardens Cultural Landscape Report and Master Plan
1060 S 900 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 200,000 $ — $ 200,000
Constituent Three Creeks West - Roadways Addendum
948 W 1300 South to 1106 W 1300 South; and 1225 S 1000 West to 948 W 1300 South, SLC UT 84104
$ 850,000 $ — $ 850,000
Public Lands Rose Park and Jordan River Recreation Hub (Other Funds - $225,000 Parks Impact Fees)
Roots Disc Golf Course - 1250 North Redwood Road, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116Rose Park Golf Course Driving Range - 1386 North Redwood Road Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
$ 270,000 $ 225,000 $ 495,000
Constituent Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design Citywide $ 75,000 $ — $ 75,000
Constituent Madsen Park Improvements (Other Funds - $300,000 Parks Impact Fees)
1000 W and South Temple St, Salt Lake City, 84116 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 500,000
Constituent
Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements (Other Funds - $294,000 Parks Impact Fees)
2100 N Exit off I-215 to Rose Park Ln and 1700 N intersection, Salt Lake City UT 84116
$ 546,000 $ 294,000 $ 840,000
Public Lands Richmond Park Community Playground (Other Funds - $212,000 Parks Impact Fees)
444 E 600 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 $ 318,000 $ 212,000 $ 530,000
Public Lands Rose Park Lane Open Space and Trail Connection Study
1954 N Rose Park Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 841161944 N Rose Park Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 841161932 N Rose Park Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 841161902 N Rose Park Lane, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
$ 140,000 $ — $ 140,000
Constituent North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements 100 South 800 West SLC, Utah 84104 $ 495,111 $ — $ 495,111
Constituent Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2
The local, neighborhood streets within the area bounded by 900 East on the west, 1100 East on the east, 2100 South on the south, and Garfield Avenue on the north.
$ 150,000 $ — $ 150,000
Constituent Fred and Ila Rose Wetland Preserve Improvements 950 S 1100 W, SLC, Utah, 84104 $ 361,073 $ — $ 361,073
Public Lands Park Strip, Median, Park Irrigation/Water Reduction Strategy and Implementation Citywide $ 500,000 $ — $ 500,000
Constituent Liberty and Jordan Parks Greenhouses - Revisioned
600 E 1300 S, Salt Lake City, UT 841051060 S 900 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
$ 242,823 $ — $ 242,823
Constituent First Encampment Park 1704 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 125,500 $ — $ 125,500
Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Other Funds Total
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
13 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Un
f
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Constituent Indiana Avenue Area - Transit & Trail Connections
The approximate mid-point of the proposed trail between the Other Side Village and the new transit hub at 500 S and Orange Street. Proposed Redwood Road signalized crossing: 1040 South Redwood Road, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
$ 162,500 $ — $ 162,500
Transportation Multimodal Capital Maintenance (Other Funds - $200,000 FOF Other)Citywide $ — $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Engineering 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding
700 South Street from 4600 West to 5000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104 $ 4,000,000 $ — $ 4,000,000
Constituent 800 S 1000 E Crosswalk Upgrade 800 South 1000 East Salt Lake City, Utah 84102 $ 336,500 $ — $ 336,500
Constituent Central 9th Streetscape Improvements
200 West between 800 S and the 900 S freeway off-ramp and 900 South between West Temple and 200 W in Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
$ 85,000 $ — $ 85,000
Constituent Sugar House Community Map Project Multiple locations throughout the Sugar House area $ 93,400 $ — $ 93,400
Facilities Phase I: Plaza 349 Life Safety, Security, and HVAC Upgrades 349 S 200 E, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84111 $ 2,000,000 $ — $ 2,000,000
Constituent Implementation of Safety Enhancements West Side Foothill Drive
Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 and1. Blaine Avenue and 2500 East2. 2600 East3. Bryan Avenue4. Westminster Avenue5. Possible modifications at Laurelhurst
$ 494,126 $ — $ 494,126
Constituent Reimagining 4th & 4th (4th West & 4th South)
400 N 400 W Intersection and Corridors, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 100,000 $ — $ 100,000
Public Lands 11th Ave Park Pavilion, Trees, and Benches (Other Funds - $533,165 Parks Impact Fees)
581 Terrace Hills Dr., Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ — $ 533,165 $ 533,165
Constituent
New Liberty Park Crosswalks and Trails (Other Funds - $13,000 Street Impact Fees, $131,000 Parks Impact Fees)
1216 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, 84105978 S 500 E, Salt Lake City, 84105(Southeast and southwest corners of Edith Ave and Williams Ave @ 500 East)
$ 118,000 $ 144,000 $ 262,000
Transportation
Sunnyside and Arapeen Signal & Safety Improvements (Other Funds - $45,000 Street Impact Fees, $405,000 Qcent Tax)
2240 East Sunnyside Ave., Salt Lake City UT 84108 $ — $ 450,000 $ 450,000
Constituent Wasatch Hollow Park: Engagement, Planning & Restoration
1631 E 1700 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84105 $ 500,000 $ — $ 500,000
Constituent Hansen Ave - West Entrance/Exit 400 West Hansen Ave, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 $ 470,703 $ — $ 470,703
Constituent Nevada Street Reconstruction Nevada Street from Redondo North to Garfield, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108 $ 479,000 $ — $ 479,000
Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Other Funds Total
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
14 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Un
f
u
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Constituent Sunnyside Pickleball Courts (Other Funds - $500,000 Parks Impact Fees)
1800 E. Sunnyside Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 $ — $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Constituent 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk 1200 E Zenith Ave. Salt Lake City, Ut 84106 $ 351,000 $ — $ 351,000
Constituent Salt Lake City Pétanque (Other Funds - $500,000 Parks Impact Fees)
Rosewood Park, 1400 N 1200 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 $ — $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Constituent Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements 163 E Ensign Vista Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 $ 210,000 $ — $ 210,000
Constituent 11th Avenue Park Pickleball Expansion (Other Funds - $502,500 Parks Impact Fees)
584 Terrace Hills Drive, Salt Lake City UT 84103 $ — $ 502,500 $ 502,500
Total Unfunded CIP Projects $ 13,873,736 $ 3,860,665 $ 17,734,401
Organization Name Proposal Title Project Address Location General Funds Other Funds Total
Salt Lake City CIP Summary Documents
15 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
This page intentionally left blank
Debit Service
Capital Improvement
Program
This page intentionally left blank
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$362,950 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2013 October 1, 2023 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013B, were issued in November 2013 for the purpose of financing a
portion of the costs of the Sugarhouse Streetcar and to pay for a portion of various improvements to create a
“greenway” within the corridor. The total par amount of bonds issued was $7,315,000.
A portion of the Series 2013B Bonds were refunded with the series 2021 Bonds. As of June 30, 2023, $355,000 in
principal remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due on October 1. The bonds mature on October 1, 2023.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$747,025 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds September 2014 October 1, 2034 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B, were issued in September 2014 for the purpose of acquiring,
constructing, remodeling, and improving of various City buildings, parks, property, and roads.
The Series 2014B bonds were issued with a par amount of $10,935,000. As of June 30, 2023, $7,460,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2034.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$2,003,973 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds June 2016 October 1, 2028 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2016A, were issued in June 2016 to refund a portion of the
Series 2009A Bonds. The Series 2009A Bonds were originally issued to finance all or a portion of the acquisition,
construction, improvement and remodel of the new Public Services maintenance facility, a building for use as City
offices and other capital improvements within the City.
Fleet contributes 13.9%, Refuse contributes 13%, and the general fund contributes 73.1% of the debt service on the
Maintenance Facility Program portion of the bonds.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $21,715,000. As of June 30, 2023, $13,880,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
on October 1, 2028.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$358,575 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds December 2019 April 1, 2027 General Fund
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
19 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019A, were issued in December 2019 to refund a portion of
the Series 2007A Bonds. The Series 2007A Bonds were originally issued to fund the TRAX Extension to the
Intermodal Hub and Grant Tower improvements to realign rail lines near downtown.
The Series 2019A bonds were issued with a par amount of $2,620,000. As of June 30, 2023, $1,270,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature April
1, 2027.
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022B
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$1,999,625.00 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2042 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022C
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$3,088,875 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds November 2022 October 1, 2032 General Fund
Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2022B&C, were issued in November 2022 to finance all or a
portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing and improving capital improvement projects, including: City Cemetery
irrigation and road repairs and reconstruction; Pioneer Park; 600 North Corridor; new radio towers for City
communication; an upgrade of the electrical transformer at the Central Plant and emergency back-up generators;
Westside railroad quiet zones; Warm Spring Plunge structure stabilization; Smith's Ballpark; urban wood re-
utilization equipment and storage additions; and Fisher Mansion stabilization; and various other capital
improvement program projects.
The Series 2022B bonds were issued with a par amount of $40,015,000. As of June 30, 2023, $40,015,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2042.
The Series 2022C bonds were issued with a par amount of $24,240,000. As of June 30, 2023, $24,240,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on October 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature
October 1, 2032.
Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$979,503 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds August 2014 April 1, 2024 Class C
The Motor Fuel Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, were issued in August 2014 for the purpose of constructing
and repairing 13th South Street from State Street to 4th West, and from State Street to 5th West, and 17th South
Street from State Street to 700 East.
The Series 2014 bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,800,000. As of June 30, 2023, $960,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on
April 1, 2024.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
20 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
ESCO Lease Debt Service
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$93,500 Capital Lease December 2019 March 2026 General Fund
This lease provides energy efficient equipment to Public Services Facilities Division.
ESCO Steiner Lease Debt Service
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$150,500 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 County
$150,500 Capital Lease January 2013 July 2029 General Fund
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for Steiner. Since the costs of
this facility is shared 50% with the County, the County pays 50% of this lease payment.
ESCO Parks Lease Debt Service
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$517,000 Capital Lease August 2012 March 2026 General Fund
This lease was entered into by Public Services to acquire energy efficient equipment for city parks.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$501,400 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds March 2016 April 15, 2037 General Fund
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A in March
2016 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #14 Project.
The Series 2016A bonds were issued with a par amount of $6,755,000. As of June 30, 2023, $5,220,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature
on April 15, 2037.
Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
$679,400 LBA Lease Revenue Bonds April 2017 April 15, 2038 General Fund
The Local Building Authority of Salt Lake City (LBA of SLC) issued the Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A in April
2017 for the purpose of financing a portion of the construction costs of the Fire Station #3 Project.
The Series 2017A bonds were issued with a par amount of $8,115,000. As of June 30, 2023, $6,950,000 in principal
remains outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 15. Interest is due semi-annually on April 15 and October 15. The bonds mature on
April 15, 2038.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
21 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
ONGOING COMMITMENTS FROM GENERAL FUND AND OTHER SOURCES
Crime Lab Rental Payments
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$600,000 General Fund
Yearly rental payments for Crime Evidence Lab.
Facilities Maintenance
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$350,000 General Fund
The Facilities ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger catastrophic failures of equipment and systems in the City’s building stock.
Trail Maintenance
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$200,000 ¼ Cent Tax
These funds will be used to fund contractors, equipment, and material to maintain urban trails and trail segments
that potentially come online during the fiscal year. The maintenance of these trails is necessary to keep them safe
for all that use them and so they can be used year-round.
Public Lands Maintenance
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$250,000 General Fund
The Parks ongoing CIP funding will be used to replace a variety of capital assets. The purpose is to stop problems
early on and prevent larger failures in the City’s park stock.
Percent for Art
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$161,518 Funding our Future
To provide enhancements such as decorative pavement, railings, sculptures, and other works of art. (1.5% of CIP)
Cost Overrun
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$22,214$225,357 General Fund & Funding Our Future
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
22 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Smith Ballfield Naming Rights
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$150,000 Other -Donations
Two parts to this request - to establish budget within the 83 fund to accept the revenue received for the naming
rights pertaining to Smith Baseball Field and to establish an expense within the 83 fund to continue addressing the
deferred maintenance backlog in this facility. This building was completed in 1990 and is now 33 yrs. old.
CIP Memorial House
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$50,000 Other - Rental
A revenue cost center has been established to receive revenue payments from the Utah Heritage Foundation.
Monthly payments are received and are to be re-invested in the facility to maintain the property. Plans for the use
of the funding is to be determined.
Real Estate Services – Surplus Land
2024 Budget Origination Date Funding Source
$700,000 General Fund
Salt Lake City Corporation holds several properties in its real estate inventory that are not used for city functions but
that are either vacant or are leased to third parties. This fund is for the maintenance, security, and improvement of
these properties.
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B
2024 Budget Type of Debt Origination Date Final Payment Funding Source
Sales Tax Revenue Bonds October 2019 April 1, 2038 RDA
Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, were issued in October 2013 for the purpose
of financing a portion of the costs of acquiring, constructing, and equipping a performing arts center and related
improvements. The Series 2013A Bonds were refunded with the Federally Taxable Sales and Excise Tax Revenue
Refunding Bonds, Series 2019B.
The RDA pays the full amount of the debt service for the Series 2019B bonds. However, if the RDA is unable to pay
any of the debt service, the City’s General Fund would be responsible for it.
The total par amount of bonds issued was $58,540,000. As of June 30, 2023, $56,790,000 in principal remains
outstanding.
Principal is due annually on April 1. Interest is due semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The bonds mature on
April 1, 2038.
Salt Lake City Debt Service CIP
23 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
This page intentionally left blank
General Fund
Capital Projects
This page intentionally left blank
Project Title:Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning
Project Address:200 East 400 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Project Description:
Many complex structural and drainage issues at Library Plaza are causing known settling and damage to critical materials (e.g., pavers, railings and footings, walls) visible on the surface. This project will include an investigation into these issues, followed by planning and design to complete the necessary changes. Specific plaza elements that will be investigated include the wedge wall near 200 East, fountain, retaining walls and pavers, and overall stability throughout the plaza. The project will also include a planning process to identify solutions and designs for activating the plaza. These will mitigate currently unknown and known barriers (including direct sunlight and little shade or protection from the elements) to increase usage in line with its original intent as a public event space.
Salt Lake City is a potential candidate for the 2030 Olympics and structural repairs, retrofitting, and reimagining space within this site and adjacent properties will be critical first steps if the City wants to use this site to host events and accommodate large crowds. If funded, this request would lay the groundwork for a funding application for construction within the next few years. Once construction is funded, this project will be a joint venture between Public Lands and Facilities.
Proposal ID:423313
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Planning
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $190,000 $190,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
27 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide
Project Address:
Main St Crossings (900 South to 2100 South): This second set of crossings is likely to include: Layton Ave, Van Buren/Bryan Ave, Cleveland / Merrimac Ave, Paxton / Kelsey Ave, Fayette, OC Tanner, Grove Ave.Glendale Park Crossing: 1300 West 1700 SouthCitywide
Project Description:
This project will fund two key projects as well as providing ongoing funding to a citywide program that installs warranted crossing beacons, traffic signals, or other traffic control devices to address safety issues.
1. Main Street Pedestrian Crossings - Ten crossing locations need upgraded crosswalks; about half will be done with funds already allocated in FY23. This request is for construction funds for the remaining locations. Anticipated construction is 2024.
2. Glendale Park / 1700 South - This request is for funds to upgrade the existing crosswalk at 1300 W 1700 S from flashing yellow beacons (RRFBs) to a pedestrian-activated signal (HAWK, Toucan, or half-signal), to fully stop traffic with a red light between the residential Glendale neighborhoods to the north and the new Glendale Regional Park (Phase 1 - 2024) to the south.
3. Citywide traffic safety projects include the installation of traffic control devices such as signals, flashers, signs, or markings to improve pedestrian safety.
Wide crosswalks like this one on Main Street will receive pedestrian refuge islands.
Proposal ID:424230
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $270,000 $270,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $90,000 $90,000
1/4 Cent Tax $540,000 $540,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
28 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements
Project Address:
Route: 200 East from 1700 South to Westminster AveKey intersection: 200 East Downington Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84115
Project Description:
200 East ADA and sidewalk improvements. This project seeks to bring a section of sidewalks near senior housing into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It also seeks to improve walkability in a low-income neighborhood by fixing a gap in continuous sidewalks.
Potential layout for new curb ramp and sidewalk at 200 East and Downington Ave.
Proposal ID:417914
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $234,000 $234,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
29 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funds will construct bus stops along frequent transit routes that reflect the recommendations of the Transit Master Plan. Examples include the 200 (State Street), 209 (900 East) and 217 (Redwood Road). Improvements ensure that stops are legal, accessible, safe, and convenient. This is a partnership program with UTA, with investment by the City made to complement (rather than supplant) UTA's plans for bus stop construction as articulated in their Bus Stop Master Plan, and City investments generate UTA investments. Salt Lake City constructs the concrete pad, and UTA provides the shelters, benches, bike racks, and trash cans. If bicyclist/pedestrian connections to bus stops are problematic or don’t exist, these funds may be used to address those issues. Funds may also provide match to $5.59 million in federal grants received so far for transit hubs (especially 200 S East Downtown Hub, Westside North Temple Hub). The transit hubs are multi-million-dollar projects; a portion of these funds will be used to provide the required local match. These projects are also partnership projects with UTA (and other potential partners, such as the University of Utah and real estate developers), with both agencies seeking funds, providing match, and together creating the full project.
Bus shelters, trash cans, and bike racks are all part of Salt Lake’s transit improvements along Frequent Transit Network routes.
Proposal ID:424222
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $110,000 $110,000
FOF Transit $990,000 $990,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
30 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide
Project Address:
1000 East 2100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84106, 200 North Virginia Street, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, Citywide
Project Description:
This program funding request provides supplemental funds to street projects that have been found, including through input from the community, to need additional complete street elements such as sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, bikeways, safer intersections, placemaking, and street greening.
This year's request focuses on three aspects: two critical streets, both tied to Streets Bond Funding in the 2024 construction season, and third, an allocation for citywide restriping and corridor designs, primarily in conjunction with planned maintenance. For these streets to be reconstructed and/or restriped to meet both City Ordinance and community expectations, these additional funds are needed.
Rendering of updated design on 2100 South
Proposal ID:424210
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $3,293,000 $3,293,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
The reconstructed streets will reduce pavement maintenance costs but may create increased operating expenses in other Departments and Divisions due to landscaping and new Complete Streets elements. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
31 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Public Way Concrete 2023/2024
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program addresses deteriorated or defective concrete sidewalks, accessibility ramps, curb and gutter, retaining walls, etc. in the public way through saw-cutting, slab jacking, or removal and replacement. Funding for this vital program in the last 4 years has averaged 53%. Providing a fully accessible public right-of-way is an unfunded federal mandate through the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Not only is it the City's legal responsibility to ensure the public way is accessible to all, it is a moral obligation.
Proposal ID:423889
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets $750,000 $750,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
32 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Livable Streets Implementation
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This citywide program aims to address the most common resident complaint to Transportation staff - speeding vehicles. It uses a data-driven & equitable prioritization process for the implementation of traffic calming improvements in the areas most in need.
Traffic circles are one tool identified in the Livable Streets Report to help slow traffic on neighborhood streets.
Proposal ID:424211
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $250,000 $250,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $1,100,000 $1,100,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
33 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Neighborhood Byways
Project Address:
975 North Star Crest Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway, approximate mid-point)1400 South 1600 East, Salt Lake City UT 84105 (Sugar House to the U Neighborhood Byway, approximate mid-point)
Project Description:
Neighborhood byways create pleasant and convenient routes for people walking, bicycling, or rolling by encouraging safe travel speeds, discouraging cut-through vehicle traffic, providing safe crossings of busy streets, and connecting people to key community destinations. These funds will be used for the engineering design and construction of the Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway, and for the engineering design of the Sugar House to the U Neighborhood Byway. Both projects are currently in conceptual design with significant community input. The Westpointe / Jordan Meadows Neighborhood Byway has already received a state grant for $900,000 toward its $1.5 million construction budget. This CIP request will serve as the required 40% match to this grant.
Technicians finishing up the installation of a neighborhood byway crossing in Poplar Grove along 400 South.
Proposal ID:424216
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $440,000 $440,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $360,000 $360,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
34 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds reconstruction of deteriorated City streets, including curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements.
Proposal ID:423853
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $2,250,000 $2,250,000
Class C Funds $2,250,000 $2,250,000
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
35 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion
Project Address:Poplar Grove Park (Indiana Avenue and Emery St.), Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
This park currently has a half court – which is used frequently, with players spilling out all over the court and grass surrounding it. This project will fund the expansion of the court which includes demolition, irrigation adjustments, a new concrete court, fencing, signage (that would include a flower bed, which will provide beautification opportunities for Friends of Poplar Grove Park to showcase their flower planting skills over the years. Not all will play on the court, but some could still benefit from this improvement by volunteering to plant flowers). Furthermore, it will also fund an artist to design and paint a mural on the new court. Which will provide an opportunity for local artists to share their talents with the community. There are so many benefits to this project - it invites all to participate, enjoy and cherish this wonderful open space for many years to come. COVID-19 may have been a hard time to deal with, but our parks became the extension of our homes and will remain that way for a long time.
Proposal ID:419327
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $253,500 $253,500
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $253,500 $253,500
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance is expected to increase by $1,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
36 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet
Project Address:356 N Redwood Rd, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
In November 2022, Public Lands acquired a property adjoining Cottonwood Dog Park and the Jordan River located at 356 Redwood Road. The dirt lot has long been used as an informal parking lot for dog park users, even prior to property acquisition. This project would develop a trailhead and parking lot that better serve the park’s current and future users. This site has the potential to better serve as a gateway to the Jordan River Trail and to Cottonwood Park as a whole, with interpretive signage, wayfinding, improved connectivity, landscaping, and a small gathering space along the river. This would also provide lighting and artwork to provide a welcoming space. This project also funds a new restroom facility to replace the existing failing restroom. It should be noted that Cottonwood Park was selected as one of District 1’s “Reimagine Neighborhood Parks, Trails, or Open Space” projects, funded by the GO Parks Bond.
Proposal ID:424360
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $202,000 $202,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $648,000 $648,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance impact is estimated at $2,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
37 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program funds rehabilitation of deteriorated City streets, including curb and gutter, sidewalk, and drainage improvements as necessary. Where appropriate, it will include appropriate complete streets bicycle and pedestrian access improvements. Street segments identified by Roadway Asset Services (RAS) as backlog candidates for 3” Overlay (OCI of approximately 40-50) are included below as recommended projects.
Suggested Project areas: 2.34 Lane MilesWasatch Drive - 1300 S to Michigan Ave (partly within Bonneville Golf Course)800 E - 100 S to 400 S (signal loops at 100 S)Work displayed below on the map.
Proposal ID:424280
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds $1,250,000 $1,250,000
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
38 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail
Project Address:
1900 West Indiana Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 841041851 East Sunnyside Ave, Salt Lake City, UT 84108
Project Description:
Two projects are critical to this urban trails request: connectivity for The Other Side Village just west of Redwood Road, and a short gap in the 9-Line Trail near the University of Utah. This request seeks funding for critical trail connections in support of "The Other Side Village," the tiny home village with assistive services that will be constructed just west of Redwood Road in the City's Glendale / Poplar Grove neighborhoods. $1.2 million will be allocated to begin improvements, currently under study, which will prioritize a multi-use trail and/or sidewalks on Indiana Avenue; safer crossings of Redwood Road; a new multi-use trail north from the Village to the transit center; and/or segments of the 9-line trail and Surplus Canal Trail (see map). This is anticipated to be Phase 1 of three or four requests. Funds will also be used for a missing gap in the 9-Line Trail near the University of Utah, where the 12' wide multi-use trail along Sunnyside Avenue narrows down to a scant 4' wide sidewalk, creating conflicts between bicyclists and pedestrians.
This section of Indiana Avenue lacks even a sidewalk connecting “The Other Side Village” to transit stops on Redwood Road.
Proposal ID:424227
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
39 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities
Project Address:273 North 1000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
This project will fund construction for restoring the courts and adding amenities at the Fire Station No. 7 Tennis Park on 300 North (west of 1000 West). This space is currently two failed tennis courts. One tennis court will be restored, and the other will be converted into two pickleball courts. The addition of two pickleball courts is necessary to meet increasing demand for usable pickleball courts throughout the city. There are currently no dedicated pickleball courts in the city’s westside neighborhoods. This project would also complete associated amenities on site, as funding is available, such as court lighting, drinking fountains, and ADA access. Public Lands has already separately funded the design of this court project. This CIP funding will go towards construction costs of the courts and other associated amenities.
Proposal ID:424358
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $438,850 $438,850
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $416,150 $416,150
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance costs will decrease by $1,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
40 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:337 Park Development
Project Address:337 South 400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Project Description:
337 Pocket Park was initially established as a community garden but has since been decommissioned as such due to adjacent higher density property development to the south shading out agricultural potential. The parcel has since been sitting vacant and in a state of disrepair. This potential pocket park needs significant development to add park service to District 4. Funding would facilitate public engagement, planning and design, and construction of the site. This project is an expansion of a previously submitted constituent CIP application during the FY22-23 cycle with the addition of Public Lands-supported direction for implementation. Currently, a small portion of the parcel (nearest to 400 East) has public art and plantings. This project would develop the remainder of the parcel. Potential amenities and features of this site will be determined with public engagement but could include an off-leash dog park, seating, and native plantings appropriate for shaded areas. This property has been the subject of continuous encroachments since the lot to the south of this parcel has been under development. There have been inquiries about the 337 Park lot being reduced to allow for access to the southern development. Because of the increased interest in this lot and the threat to this valuable property in a low level-of-service area for parks, it is critical for the development of this lot to move forward as quickly as possible.
Proposal ID:423315
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $550,000 $550,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance impact is estimated at $7,500.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
41 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Jefferson Park Improvements
Project Address:Fremont Ave and West Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Project Description:
Jefferson Park is an under-resourced jewel in the Ballpark Neighborhood. This application seeks to address long standing issues identified in the City’s Ballpark Station Area Plan, including “a lack of service and proper maintenance in current parks”. The park currently has a small, aging playground (to be replaced through separate funding by Public Lands in 2023) with two benches as well as a set of temporary soccer nets and an off-leash dog area. The constituent applicants request the following:
•Safety improvements: Ample, attractive 'dark sky' lighting throughout the perimeter of the park and fencing around the playground area. Given the area’s crime, this is essential.
•Health improvements: Permanent, attractive garbage cans along the perimeter of the park to reduce the constant flow of garbage (including clothing, needles, and human waste), and to encourage responsible dog ownership.
•Activation improvements: The retention pond berm is an ideal location for a walking path around the park and provides residents with a place to exercise. Adding a few benches (with garbage cans) under the existing shade trees, like in Liberty Park, will encourage activation.
Proposal ID:417708
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $530,000 $530,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance would increase by $4,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
42 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Parks Bilingual Signage Installation
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This project will replace existing signage and add new bilingual signage in English and Spanish in approximately ten parks citywide. This project will be the second phase of implementation of the City's new multi-lingual signage standards. The standards were completed in early 2022, with the first phase of implementation occurring in 2023 and early 2024. The first phase of implementation included ten parks and were initially chosen because they are classified as Community Parks in the Public Lands Master Plan, have numerous and varying amenities, and lack effective signage types and locations currently. The second phase of implementation, to be completed with this funding proposal, are the next largest parks with varying amenities that necessitate the addition of signage that the park currently lacks.
Currently, many parks, natural areas and public spaces are not adequately signed for appropriate and effective communication of public lands' regulations, assets, amenities, and stories. This project would not only add signage to parks with outdated or inadequate signage, but would add bilingual information on all signs in order to enhance communication and provide public lands information more equitably and reliably throughout Salt Lake City. The project will also help the City accomplish the goals of the recently-adopted Reimagine Nature Public Lands Master Plan.
Proposal ID:423318
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $82,800 $82,800
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $331,200 $331,200
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance impact: $2,900
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
43 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Fairpark Roundabout Construction Phase
Project Address:500 North 1000 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116
Project Description:
1000 West is an important street for the Fairpark neighborhood and access to the Utah State Fairpark. Over the last two years, Salt Lake City Transportation Division has engaged with the community about the challenges and opportunities on 1000 West. Common requests for changes to 1000 West include slowing vehicle speeds, making the crosswalks safer, improving street aesthetics, and balancing regional access needs with neighborhood livability.
This application is requesting funds to build a roundabout at the intersection of 1000 West and 500 North. This application is related to one submitted for FY23, that awarded funds for study/design only. The Transportation Division is actively working on the study/design while supporting this application for construction funds. Intersection upgrades at 500 North is consistent with the 1000 West Corridor Plan, which seeks to moderate vehicle speeds, improve walkability, add landscaping, and create a gateway feature for the neighborhood.
Proposal ID:416618
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
¼ Cent Tax $497,000 $497,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Other departments and divisions may have increased operating expenses as a result of projects that would be planned / designed using these funds. These other agencies will be included in the planning and design process.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
44 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
This annual program, kicked off in 2021, funds reconstruction or rehabilitation of deteriorated City alleyways, including pavement and drainage improvements as necessary.
Proposal ID:424439
Department:Engineering
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Streets $250,000 $250,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
45 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension
Project Address:211 South 500 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102
Project Description:
Originally constructed in 1994, Fire Station #1 was built to house the resources (both human and mechanical) that were in use at the time. Since then, much of our apparatus and equipment needs at this strategic location have changed, requiring additional space. Fire Station #1 is located at 211 South 500 East, in the heart of Salt Lake City’s downtown. The call volume for this station is consistently the highest in the city and has been steadily increasing over the past five (5) years. In fact, it recently came to the attention of SLCFD Administration that the current call volume and projected increase would be unsustainable for the single fire engine that was housed there. In response, the Administration made the data-based decision to reassign existing resources within the City, in an effort to alleviate the pressure on the fire crews operating out of Station 1 Specifically, a fire truck was moved from Fire Station #5 to Fire Station #1, essentially repurposing Fire Station #1 to what is known in the industry as a “dual-company house.” While this reassignment of resources has certainly shown a more balanced delivery of emergency services, there are logistical limitations affecting the housing of the newly assigned aerial apparatus. The three newest and most advanced SLCFD aerial apparatus (trucks) are too long to be housed in the apparatus bays at Fire Station #1. Consequently, we have implemented the use of an older, shorter aerial apparatus. In the meantime, we await the construction of a new, smaller in length truck (not a standard build) which is anticipated to take 3-4 years to build. Additionally, there is uncertainty that the manufacturer will be able to build this length of truck in the future. As such, it is requested that funding be made available to design and construct the expansion of four (4) apparatus bays at Fire Station #1.
Proposal ID:425243
Department:Fire
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $648,771 $648,771
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Other $500,000 $500,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
46 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Following a 10-year plan to eliminate the $45,600,000 in deferred asset renewal, the Facilities Division will utilize the funds requested to replace assets that are beyond their useful life, prioritizing replacements based on asset criticality.
Proposal ID:426588
Department:Facilities
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $1,700,000 $1,700,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual maintenance cost will be reduced as new assets are more efficient, switching from reactive repair work to ongoing preventative maintenance.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
47 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
The Streets Division, part of Public Services, will be the project sponsor and implementation manager. Streets is requesting to begin a Mill & Overlay pilot program, which is a more robust form of roadway surface treatment. Many existing city roadways do not currently need a full depth reconstruction but are not in good enough condition for current maintenance surface treatments, namely chip and slurry seal. If nothing is done, these roads will continue to deteriorate and soon require a costly reconstruction. The Mill & Overlay program would allow Streets to perform maintenance on these roads at a lower cost, compared to reconstructing. To carry out this pilot program the Streets Division needs two additional pieces of equipment, an Asphalt Paver, and a Cold-Milling Machine.
Proposal ID:426528
Department:Streets
Project Type:Capital
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
1/4 Cent Tax $750,000 $750,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Average yearly maintenance cost: $19,400 (for both pieces of equipment)
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
48 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens
Project Address:1060 South 900 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84104
Project Description:
Despite receiving hundreds of visitors per day, the International Peace Gardens in District 2 has dilapidated garden architecture. Hollows left by stolen plaques and artwork remind visitors of theft and vandalism, and limit their understanding of the history and cultures behind the 28 national garden exhibits. CIP funding is needed to replace or replicate, conserve, and conceive a plan and trust fund for future upkeep of this trove of art, ethnic and botanic diversity. This request consists of multiple projects that include: conservation and restoration artworks, design and replacement of artwork that has been removed/stolen, replacement of perennial botanicals and landscaping, structural study and design exploring expansion of the greenhouse while assessing the feasibility of a visitor space/exhibition space.
Proposal ID:418741
Department:Public Lands
Project Type:Capital
Category: New, Constituent
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $325,000 $325,000
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Annual Maintenance Impact: $1,000-$3,000.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
49 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement
Project Address:1300 East @ 400 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 or1300 East @ 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT 84102
Project Description:
Upgrade one aging traffic signal, along with parts of the surrounding intersection, with safety and operational improvements for all modes. The typical life of a traffic signal is 30 years. After that age, frequent repairs are needed, and the structural supports for the traffic signal may be at risk of failing. Twenty traffic signals in Salt Lake City are over 40 years old, with some of them rapidly approaching 75 years old. This project will fund the design and construction to replace one of the oldest and/or poorest condition traffic signals in Salt Lake City. The project will replace and upgrade the signal with new steel poles, signal heads, and detection, including current best practices for pedestrian detection and design, pedestrian countdown timers, and motor vehicle left turn phasing, as needed. It is anticipated that a traffic signal along 1300 East near the University of Utah will be selected. Those traffic signals were constructed in 1948.
75-year-old traffic signal at the busy intersection of 1300 East 400 South.
Proposal ID:424235
Department:Transportation
Project Type:Capital
Category: Renewal
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds $40,000 $40,000
1/4 Cent Tax $360,000 $360,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
This signal reconstruction will reduce signal maintenance costs, as keeping an older traffic signal alive past its normal expiration date typically includes extra repairs.
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
50 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Westside Art
Project Address:Westside of Salt Lake City
Project Description:
An art project will be incorporated into the City’s westside neighborhood.
Proposal ID:N/A
Department:
Project Type:Art
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $150,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
51 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Cost Overrun
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to cover unforeseen costs of projects.
Proposal ID:NA
Department:
Project Type:Overrun
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $22,214
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $225,357
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
52 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Percent for Art
Project Address:Citywide
Project Description:
Funding set aside to provide art at City developed projects.
Proposal ID:NA
Department:
Project Type:Art
Category: New
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund
Class C Funds
Impact Fee Funds
FOF Other $161,518
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
None
Salt Lake City General Fund Capital Projects
53 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
This page intentionally left blank
Enterprise Fund
Capital Projects
This page intentionally left blank
The Department of Airports
The Department of Airports is an enterprise fund of Salt Lake City Corporation and does not receive any
general fund revenues to support the operation of the City’s system of airports. The Department of
Airports (the Airport) has 639 employee budgeted positions and is responsible for managing, developing,
and promoting airports that provide quality transportation facilities and services, and a convenient travel
experience.
The Fiscal Year 2024 budget continues to see growth in enplanements, revenues, as well as expenditures.
The Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) continues to benefit from the American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) as well as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) grants awarded for FY2024. The Airport will use
the remaining funds in the ARPA grants which will help offset operating and maintenance expenses that
will lower the landing fee and terminal rents charged in FY24 as well as make up for lost revenues. The
BIL grants will continue to provide much needed and critical funding for airport capital infrastructure
projects that are moving from design into actual construction. The Airport will be bringing on 22 gates
located on South Concourse East (SCE) in October 2024 which brings additional staffing and maintenance
staff requirements while seeing a significant reduction in the hardstand operations.
The developed FY24 budget continues to provide positive financial benefits with increased passengers
and revenues that help offset increased operating expenses. The Airport will continue to fund important
capital projects. These projects include the Terminal Redevelopment Program (TRP) and the North
Concourse Program (NCP), which together are called the New SLC. In addition, critical projects found in
the airfield, terminal, and auxiliary airports will continue to be funded to ensure that all Airport’s owned
facilities keep up with critical infrastructure to support the growth we are currently experiencing as well
as the growth we are projecting into future years.
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
57 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:CUP Crossover Piping
Project Description:
This project will provide crossover 12-inch diameter piping from the existing 12-inch chilled water supply and return lines to the 20-inch supply and return hot water piping that feeds the Airport Terminal and Concourse areas from the Central Utility Plant (CUP). This would enable the Airport to maintain chilled water for cooling and hot water for heating as a backup to the system if there is a failure of lines that run underground from the CUP to the Terminal and Concourse areas.
Project Justification:
The existing chilled water and hot water piping systems run underground from a standalone location in the CUP north to the Airport Terminals and Concourse areas. If a failure of either supply lines happens, the crossover piping would facilitate the transfer of chilled water and/or hot water to keep the supply of cooling or heating to continue in a temporary operation mode until a permanent fix could be made.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 November 2023 June 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$401,000 $54,000 $8,000 $2,000 $40,000 $505,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$505,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
58 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Decommission R/W 14-32 & T/W Improvements (Design)
Project Description:
As outlined in the SLCIA Master Plan, Runway 14-32 has two FAA hot spot locations and numerous non- standard geometry challenges. This runway accounts for only 1 percent of total aircraft operations at SLCIA and is unnecessary in the SLCIA runway system to meet FAA-defined wind coverage requirements and thus is not eligible for federal funding assistance. This means the entire cost of any and all corrective solutions would be paid by SLCDA. Through engagement with SLCDA staff and stakeholders, it was determined the cost to correct the runway hot spots outweighs the benefit the runway provides to the airport system. The Master Plan concluded that the final solution for implementation is to remove Runway 14-32.
Project Justification:
Projects in the short-term phase of airport development focus on modifications to the airfield that enhance airport operational safety. These projects address changes in runways and taxiways needed to reduce the potential for runway incursions and comply with current FAA airport design standards. This request is to develop the design on removing Runway 14-32 and modifications needed to the existing taxiway connections at Taxiways J, M, P, and Q.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 June 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$367,000 $20,000 $18,000 $405,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$405,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
59 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Replace Pumps in Glycol Pumps Stations
Project Description:
This project will replace the existing piping, pumps, and valves in the Intermediate East Pump Station (IEPS) and the East Pump Station (EPS) for the glycol pump stations.
Project Justification:
The piping, pumps, and valves for the glycol pump stations have been in service for over 20 years and are approaching the end of their useful service life. The piping and equipment are obsolete and can no longer be maintained, and are showing significant signs of deterioration due to the corrosive nature of the deicing fluid. New pumps that are more efficient, require less maintenance, and safe guard against system failure will be installed. These pumps are long lead items and are critical for de- ice operations on Taxiway L and the 34R de-ice pad.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 203 July 2023 October 2023
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$734,000 $155,000 $5,000 $73,000 $967,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$967,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
60 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Taxiway F Reconstruction (G - F1) - (Construction)
Project Description:
This project is a continuing phase to maintain the Airport's infrastructure and bring the taxiway geometry to current FAA standards. The project will consist of replacing the pavement on Taxiway F between Taxiways G and F1. Work will include demolition of existing concrete pavement and econocrete base, unclassified excavation, placement of engineered fill, placement of new econocrete base course and new portland cement concrete. Also included is the installation of new in-pavement centerline base cans and the reinstallation of centerline and taxiway edge lights complete with new underground cabling and connectors. Finally new asphalt shoulder paving and pavement marking will be done.
Project Justification:
Taxiway F connects Runway 16R-34L and Runway 16L-34R with the terminal area. It has a high volume of aircraft use because it serves as a major taxi route for arriving and departing aircraft. The taxiway concrete panels are showing signs of pavement distress including surface spalling, full depth slab cracking, and corner breaking indicating that the pavement is at the end of its useful service life. This area has received multiple patches where the concrete has settled indicating possible base failure. This project will make a significant contribution to safety and capacity by ensuring that the taxiway pavement integrity is preserved while minimizing FOD.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
April 2024 October 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$9,400,000 $9,400,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$7,050,000 $2,350,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
61 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Taxiway U & V Proper (Design)
Project Description:
This project is the first of two phases that includes constructing a tunnel structure to allow for Taxiways U and V to cross over a depressed portion of 4000 West. This work includes realigning 4000 West as identified on the SLCIA master plan and shown on the Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Other components of this project are constructing MSE walls along the new 4000 West realignment, earthwork, asphalt and concrete paving, relocating conflicting utilities, drainage systems, and fencing.
Project Justification:
The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified Taxiways U and V as a new cross field taxiway system between the north cargo support area and existing concourses. Currently Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway connections between Runways 16R/34L - 16L/34R and the terminal area. The construction of Taxiways U and V will provide alternative taxi routes to improve aircraft circulation and overall airfield efficiency and safety, particularly during snow removal operations on Taxiways E and F. This project will provide an immediate benefit to flow of aircraft on the airfield as well as improving safety by reducing traffic in a very congested area on the airfield. With current passenger numbers already approaching 2019 numbers and the airlines expecting to increase operations at SLCIA, there is a need to expand the airfield capacity. Additionally, the new taxiway system will allow for future maintenance to occur on Taxiways E and F as well as provide an enabling project for a future Concourse C.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 June 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$4,725,000 $4,725,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$4,725,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
62 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Taxiway U & V Tunnel & Roadway Realignment
Project Description:
This project is the first of two phases that includes constructing a tunnel structure to allow for Taxiways U and V to cross over a depressed portion of 4000 West. This work includes realigning 4000 West as identified on the SLCIA master plan and shown on the Airport Layout Plan (ALP). Other components of this project are constructing MSE walls along the new 4000 West realignment, earthwork, asphalt and concrete paving, relocating conflicting utilities, drainage systems, and fencing.
Project Justification:
The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified Taxiways U and V as a new cross field taxiway system between the north cargo support area and existing concourses. Currently Taxiways E and F are the only taxiway connections between Runways 16R/34L - 16L/34R and the terminal area. The construction of Taxiways U and V will provide alternative taxi routes to improve aircraft circulation and overall airfield efficiency and safety, particularly during snow removal operations on Taxiways E and F. This project will provide an immediate benefit to flow of aircraft on the airfield as well as improving safety by reducing traffic in a very congested area on the airfield. With current passenger numbers already approaching 2019 numbers and the airlines expecting to increase operations at SLCIA, there is a need to expand the airfield capacity. Additionally, the new taxiway system will allow for future maintenance to occur on Taxiways E and F as well as provide an enabling project for a future Concourse C.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 March 2024 November 2026
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$64,560,000 $6,339,000 $1,291,000 $5,000 $6,456,000 $78,651,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$36,570,000 $42,081,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
63 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:UPS Pump Station Replacement
Project Description:
The glycol collection system is deteriorating in older portions of the airport. In new development the ability to divert low concentration surface water has been implemented to improve the efficiency of the reclamation process. This project will replace the pumps at the UPS Cargo facility pump station due to deterioration and add a diversion vault with actuators, similar to more recent installations. The actuators help manage the large volume of water that does not need treatment which is generated from the cargo ramp deicing pads.
Project Justification:
The pump station near the UPS Cargo facility is rapidly deteriorating and is in need of replacement. The surface water that is collected during inclement weather that does not need to be treated at the reclamation plant needs to be diverted to storm drain. This project replaces essential infrastructure as well as improves efficiency of the reclamation process, ultimately reducing processing costs. The pump station work needs to be completed prior to the start of the Airport's deicing season to accommodate the air cargo carriers.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 July 2023 October 2023
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,164,000 $178,000 $23,000 $2,000 $116,000 $1,483,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,483,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
64 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Demo Row 21 - Apron & Taxiway Reconstruction
Project Description:
This project is for site development within General Aviation Zone 3 on the eastside of Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) to support future expansion. Work will include demolition of an existing row of T-hangars along with asbestos mitigation, if necessary, and site preparation consisting of taxilane pavement reconstruction and rerouting of existing water and storm drain utilities.
Project Justification:
The only remaining undeveloped land in General Aviation Zone 3 on the eastside of SLCIA currently cannot accommodate larger ADG II aircraft. This project will construct a taxilane for access to undeveloped areas at the Airport and allow for future growth.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 June 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,126,000 $141,000 $23,000 $210,000 $113,000 $1,613,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,613,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
65 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:SVRA Hangar Site Development - Phase I
Project Description:
This project will widen the existing taxilane north of the existing shade hangars and construct a new ramp complete with underground utilities for a proposed future site for a new T-hangar at the South Valley Regional Airport (SVRA).
Project Justification:
An existing taxilane north of the shade hangars will be widened approximately 21' to accommodate Group II aircraft to access a new 220' x 750' ramp where a future T-hangar will be constructed. New underground utilities consisting of gas, power, communication, water, storm drain, and sewer will be installed and stubbed up to within 15 feet of the future T-hangars.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 September 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$2,276,000 $216,000 $46,000 $1,000 $182,000 $2,721,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$2,721,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
66 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:TVY Water & Sewer Improvements
Project Description:
This project will provide water and sewer infrastructure to the Tooele Valley Airport (TVY) to support the future aerial firefighting facilities being constructed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This work includes the installation of a sewer lift station, 16,500 LF of sewer line, and 16,500 LF of water line.
Project Justification:
Salt Lake City Corporation recently signed a lease agreement with the BLM which will begin construction of government facilities including a Single Engine Airtanker (SEAT) base of operations to include Air Attack, Helitack operations, retardant distribution and containment systems, and an Aviation Dispatch Center building on approximately 10 acres at TVY. Development of future hangars and facilities cannot occur until water and sewer utilities are available at TVY. The BLM is expected to begin construction of their new facility in 2023 and have an operational SEAT base by 2025. SLCDA is working on an agreement with Grantsville City to connect the water and sewer utilities.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 April 2024 October 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$7,399,000 $259,000 $148,000 $500,000 $740,000 $9,046,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$9,046,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
67 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Electrical Vehicle Charging Stations FY24
Project Description:
Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA) has created a Master Plan for a phased installation program of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (EVCS) and infrastructure relative to the annual purchase of electric vehicles in Utah. For the past several years, the Airport has received rebates from Rocky Mountain Power which have reimbursed up to 75% of the cost to purchase and install EVCS on the Airport campus. This year the Airport will apply for funding incentives to install infrastructure for 16 level 2 EVCS for employee parking.
Project Justification:
Salt Lake City is designated as a Serious Nonattainment Area for EPA's 24-hour standard for particulate matter PM2.5. Fine particulate matter, or PM2.5 is an air pollutant resulting from motor vehicle emissions that contribute to respiratory problems. This project will promote additional options for sustainable transportation and will reduce area emissions that contribute to fine particulate matter. The Airport is proposing to install infrastructure and purchase 16 Level 2 EVCS for the employee parking lot.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 September 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$884,000 $89,000 $2,000 $5,000 $88,000 $1,068,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,068,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
68 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Design)
Project Description:
This program will implement a series of projects over the next 5 years that will allow for the development of the Southern Open Space (Former Golf Course) into an employee parking lot as shown on the new SLCIA ALP. Phase 1 of this project will design the relocation of the surplus canal. This phase is intended to complete the design and permitting requirements set forth by the USACE. Phase 2 will be to mitigate the wetlands in the area which will allow for the new canal to be relocated. Phase 3 will be to relocate the canal to the south, parallel to the existing TRAX line. Phases 4 and 5 will then design and build the infrastructure, parking lot, roadways, and employee screening facility required to operate the South Employee Parking Lot.
Project Justification:
The Environmental Assessment (EA) currently underway requires the design of the surplus canal relocation to be completed to a 60% design level. This budget request is to complete the balance of the design and provide contract documents for bid, award, and construction administration for the FY2025 construction season.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 July 2025 June 2028
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$1,410,000 $19,000 $10,000 $120,000 $1,559,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,559,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
69 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:S Employee Parking Lot Development Program / Surplus Canal Relocation (Construction)
Project Description:
This program will implement a series of projects over the next 5 years that will allow for the development of the Southern Open Space (Former Golf Course) into an employee parking lot as shown on the new SLCIA ALP. Phase 1 of this project will design the relocation of the surplus canal. This phase is intended to complete the design and permitting requirements set forth by the USACE. Phase 2 will be to mitigate the wetlands in the area which will allow for the new canal to be relocated. Phase 3 will be to relocate the canal to the south, parallel to the existing TRAX line. Phases 4 and 5 will then design and build the infrastructure, parking lot, roadways, and employee screening facility required to operate the South Employee Parking Lot.
Project Justification:
The recently completed SLCIA master plan identified that a new employee parking lot will be needed to accommodate the forecasted increase in employee numbers at our facility. The existing South Employee Parking Lot will be reutilized to accommodate the forecasted increase in passenger parking. With passenger numbers already approaching past 2019 numbers and the airlines expecting to increase both their operations and employee numbers at SLCIA, the need to expand our parking has been accelerated. There currently is not enough parking to sustain peak days. This program will provide an immediate and long-term parking solution.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 July 2025 June 2028
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$45,185,000 $4,784,000 $904,000 $5,417,000 $4,518,000 $60,808,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$60,808,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
70 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:AOC Backup Generator
Project Description:
This project will provide a new 480V backup generator to support the Airport Operations Center (AOC) building users that have been affected by power outages.
Project Justification:
The Airport Operations Center (AOC) is considered a vital building where Airport Control is directed and maintained. After a number of recent power outages, the facility users requested the building service loads to be backed up by a new generator. The AOC building is currently supported from two electrical services and two emergency standby generators. Envision Engineering, one of the Airport's on-call electrical consultants, has completed a study to evaluate the AOC standby branch capacity on the south side of the building and proposed options to backup these loads for the vital functions of the AOC. The option selected was to move the entire distribution panel NDL-1A-01 to a new 480V generator to meet the demands for full backup power.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 December 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$250,000 $29,000 $5,000 $2,000 $25,000 $311,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$311,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
71 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Demo FAA FMP and Construct New Roadway
Project Description:
This project is for additional site development in General Aviation Zone 3 on the east side of Salt Lake City International Airport (SLCIA) to support current demand for corporate hangar development. Work will include demolition of the FAA FMP building and construction of a new hangar access road. This project includes site preparation and construction of taxilane pavement and installation of new underground utilities to a future hangar lease area. A new 475-foot wide by 30-foot long hangar access road and taxilane pavement will be constructed up to the future hangar lease line.
Project Justification:
The only remaining undeveloped land in General Aviation Zone 3 on the east side of SLCIA currently cannot accommodate larger ADG II aircraft for future hangar facility development. This project will construct infrastructure to allow for future growth.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 September 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$783,000 $75,000 $48,000 $60,000 $78,000 $1,044,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,044,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
72 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:NS1 & NS4 Switch Gear & Capacitor
Project Description:
This project will replace the Electrical Main Distribution equipment for buildings NS1 and NS4 located in North Support and provide a power factor capacitor bank for NS4 to condition the power output within this building. The work includes the purchase and installation of all new main electrical distribution equipment for the incoming high voltage Rocky Mountain Power (RMP) that feeds the main breakers and switchboards in both buildings. This also includes miscellaneous conduit, cabling, and junction box work.
Project Justification:
The NS1 and NS4 North Support buildings were constructed approximately 37 years ago and replacement parts for the original electrical equipment in these buildings is no longer available. This is due to the electrical manufacturer going out of business. Since parts are no longer available for purchase, any failure of the electrical infrastructure in either of these buildings will impact Airport Fleet Maintenance, Warehouse, and Roads and Grounds staff and equipment. Also impacted would be the CASS, Radio, and Electrical shops.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 December 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$905,000 $77,000 $7,000 $2,000 $72,000 $1,063,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$1,063,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
73 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:NWS Replacement Controls
Project Description:
This project will replace the existing Variable Air Volume (VAV) units that have reached the end of their useful life in the tenant area of the National Weather Service (NWS) facility. The units will be replaced with new VAV units with Direct Digital Controls (DDC).
Project Justification:
The existing VAV units are pneumatically controlled and have reached the end of their useful life and will be replaced with new units that have integrated DDC controls allowing BACKNET connections for the control and maintenance by Airport Maintenance.
Design Start Date Construction Start Date Project Completion Date
July 2023 October 2023 June 2024
Construction Cost Design, Construction Admin., & Inspection Testing Expenses Contingency Estimated Cost at Completion
$494,000 $66,000 $10,000 $5,000 $49,000 $624,000
AIP Funds PFC Funds CFC Funds GARBS Airport Funds
$624,000
PROJECT LOCATION
Salt Lake City Airport Capital Projects
74 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
The Salt Lake City Golf Division
The Golf Division operates seven full-service golf courses at six Salt Lake City locations providing quality
recreational experiences at a competitive price for Salt Lake City residents and visitors from surrounding
cities and various out of state locations. Golf Course Capital Projects are funded, primarily, from excess
revenue generated by user fees. Over the past several years, expenses have outpaced revenues and have
limited Golf’s ability to self-fund most if not all non-emergency Capital Projects. In 2012, a Golf CIP Fund
was established that allocates $1 per every 9 holes played and 9% from all annual pass sales toward
building funds that can be used exclusively for Capital Projects. Until FY 2019, these funds had not been
released for use as the fund balance was needed to provide a fund balance offset against a fund deficit.
As part of the FY22 budget proposal, the Golf Division implemented a Golf CIP Fee increase from $1 to $2
per every 9 holes played, beginning in January 2022, in order to bring more capital into the Golf CIP Fund
to increase funding from this source for additional future projects.
The Golf Division has produced excess revenue over the past 3 years and is able to begin re-investing
funds into long-overdue projects.
The Golf Division has budgeted $6,610,220 for Capital Improvement Projects in FY24. The Golf Division is
undertaking a four-year project to improve tee box hitting surfaces by re-leveling and re-sodding many of
the tee box areas at each course and have allocated $60,000 in FY24 from the Golf CIP Fund. The Golf
Division is undertaking a multi-year project to repair existing cart paths and construct some new carts
paths and has allocated $525,000 for FY24. Other significant projects include new parking lot resurfacing
at the Mountain Dell and driving range hitting facility at Glendale golf course.
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will
be using $424,263 in FY24 to purchase additional equipment.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
75 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Tee Box Leveling
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing tee box leveling at all 6 courses ($60,000). Salt Lake City customer satisfaction surveys and course evaluation initiatives have shown that the biggest area of needed improvement is the condition of the tee boxes. This is an area where course labor can be utilized to perform a large portion of the work. The Golf Division proposes utilizing Golf CIP funds to pay for needed equipment and supplies. Each course will undertake a four-year plan to address tee box leveling of existing tee boxes and to begin construction of new forward tee boxes.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $60,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
76 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Pump Replacement
Project Address:Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing the first of five irrigation pumps at Glendale golf course ($20,000). The replacement of these pumps will take place over a 5-year period. This is the first of 5 pumps that are nearing their life expectancy. At any time if one of these pumps goes down it will have impact on our ability to irrigate the golf course.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Replacement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Funds $20,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
77 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Maintenance Equipment
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
As part of a multi-year plan to upgrade vital maintenance equipment at all courses, the Golf Division will be using $424,263 in FY24 to purchase additional used equipment (usually lease-return equipment from high-end private courses). The plan would be to purchase equipment if available such as Sprayer, Groundsmaster, Greensmaster.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Equipment
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf Operating Fund $424,263
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
78 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Parking Lot Resurfacing
Project Address:Mountain Dell
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be resurfacing the parking lot at Mountain Dell. This improvement project is estimated to cost ($250,000). The current parking lot surface is beyond just normal sealing and patching and will require full replacement.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $250,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
79 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Property Fencing Project
Project Address:Nibley Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be replacing property fencing at Nibley Park golf course ($55,220). The projects consist of removal of existing damaged fencing along the northern perimeter (2700 south) and replacing it with new fencing material.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvement
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $55,220
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
80 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:New Construction Projects
Project Address:Glendale
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be entering into the planning phases of a new construction project at Glendale Golf Course ($1,300,000). The projects consist of a double-decker range structure and new fencing at Glendale. This project will position the Glendale driving range to take advantage of changing market conditions and will expand the range capacity and extend the use of the range by 3 to 4 additional months annually, having a significant increase in driving range revenue generation and providing an enhanced recreation opportunity for City residents and visitors.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Construction
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $1,300,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
81 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Irrigation Improvements
Project Address:Rose Park
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing irrigation improvements at Rose Park ($4,400,000). The current mainline system is as old as 65 years and is in desperate need of replacement. This project also includes a turfgrass reduction plan and some redesign of certain holes to allow for a more efficient system, utilizing fewer heads and potential water use reduction of up to 40%.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $4,400,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
82 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Cart Path Improvements
Project Address:All 6 SLC Golf Courses
Project Description:
The Golf Division will be doing cart path improvements at all 6 courses ($525,000). Well-maintained golf cart paths are critical for the overall customer experience and for helping to preserve golf course playing conditions. The existing paths are decades behind receiving proper repair and expansion. Additionally, with slight modifications, many cart paths can be used by non-golfers during the off season or other times when conditions are not ideal for golf.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Lands - Golf
Project Type:Improvements
Category: Capital
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
Golf CIP Fund $525,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Future maintenance and operational expenses for the replacement of these already existing assets are developed within the Golf’s annual operational budgets.
Salt Lake City Golf Capital Projects
83 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
This page intentionally left blank
The Salt Lake City Public Utilities
Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities (SLCDPU) has four distinct utilities: water, sewer, storm water,
and street lighting. Each utility is operated as a separate enterprise fund. Tax money is not used to fund
these services. Funding for SLCDPU capital expenditures comes from user fees, fund reserves, revenue
bonds, and occasionally a grant or state/federal government subsidized loan. The department is utilizing
a Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan to finance a portion of the water reclamation
facility construction. Customers pay for the services they receive through utility rates that have been
established for each fund. The rates were developed on a cost of service basis. Our utilities are
infrastructure intensive and administration of these assets requires long term project and financial
planning.
The SLCDPU capital budget is shown by fund with subcategory cost centers under each. In fiscal year
2024, the department has over 95 capital projects between the four funds as well as continuing work on
existing projects. Many of the capital projects in Public Utilities cover multiple fiscal years. It is common
for projects designed in one year and be constructed in subsequent years. The budget includes projects
rated as a high priority in the Department’s Capital Asset Program (CAP). The replacement of the water
reclamation facility is the largest project undertaken by SLCDPU. Other elements of our systems are also
experiencing aging problems and will require increasing attention in the future. For example, our three
water treatment plants were built in the 1950’s and early 60’s. Planning is underway for each of the three
plants to determine the best approaches for their replacement. A unique aspect of capital projects in
SLCDPU is that Federal, State, and local regulations affect many of our priorities. Adding to the complexity
are water rights and exchange agreement obligations.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
85 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Water Main Replacements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 1,300 miles of aging water pipe. Over the past 10 years, Public Utilities has replaced an average of 18,820 linear feet per year. The budget includes two major transmission line projects: 1) $5,000,000 for the continuation of a master plan project – East-West Conveyance Line – Terminal Reservoir to 300 East and 2) next phase of Upper Conduit for $3,500,000. This category also includes $6,120,000 for routine replacement of pipelines in poor condition at various locations in the system with $2,950,000 related to the Funding our Future streets bond projects. The department is continuing to develop a more robust way to identify pipeline replacement priorities and corrosion related issues within the system.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $14,620,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
86 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Treatment Plant Improvements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
All three city-owned water treatment plants (WTPs) were built in the 1950's and early 1960's. Each plant is nearing the end of its expected life and will need to be rebuilt. The City Creek WTP will be rebuilt first based on DPU’s receipt of a FEMA BRIC grant for this project. The grant is a 70% match up to $36.6M. Work during the coming FY includes completion of design ($1.7M), start of construction ($12.5M), and continued public engagement ($290K).
The reconstruction of the Big Cottonwood WTP will be delayed until sufficient budget is available to design and construct this important project. However, construction of the Big Cottonwood Creek Pump Station ($10M this year) and associated SLA Replacement – Cottonwoods Connection pipeline ($10M this year) will begin as part of a regionalization approach that allows Big Cottonwood Creek water to be treated using available capacity of the existing Little Cottonwood WTP. This pump station and pipeline will serve as redundancy to both the Big Cottonwood WTP and the portion of the Big Cottonwood Conduit that conveys drinking water from the plant to the City’s drinking water distribution system.
This cost center also includes replacing failing components as they wear out as part of annual budget ($2M) to ensure regulatory compliance until larger projects can be funded. Finally, the budget for capital project support of $1.65M includes contracted project management support necessary for delivery of these important projects.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $38,340,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of $2.2M per/year.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
87 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Deep Pump Wells
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The Department would like to bring more wells online to help supplement water supplies, first starting with inactive wells. One of these inactive wells is the budgeted 1500 East Well. This well and other inactive wells are being evaluated for future use and repair or rehabilitation, as required to bring wells to current codes and Division of Drinking Water standards.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $100,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
88 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Meter Change-Out Program
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The budget includes the continuation of the small meter change out program piloted in 2015 and initiated in 2018. Metering water consumption by customers is the source of our revenue. Approximately 51,100, or 63%, of the system’s water meters have been replaced with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) read meters. With optimal conditions, 10,000 to 12,000 meters per year can be replaced. Supply chain issues have created delays thus replacement is planned at 8,000 meters per year. The plan is to complete the residential AMI meter change out program in the next 4 to 4 ½ years. AMI technology provides hourly usage information instead of relying on monthly data. An online portal provides our customers with information to better manage their water usage and alerts to the status of their water service. Better information will assist us in water conservation efforts.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $2,500,000
Priority: Ongoing program
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
89 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Water Service Connections
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Water service extends beyond the corporate boundaries of Salt Lake City. Approximately 37% of our service connections are in this outlying area. Repair and replacement of these connections are part of an ongoing program. The components of this program are service line replacements, new connections, and small and large meter maintenance and replacement. Public Utilities is determining the best way to implement the EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Revision (LCRR) including developing inventories, sampling plans, public outreach, and lateral service line replacements. The plan will include resources, personnel, and capital needs. Budget associated with the LCRR includes $500,000 to support pothole work associated with inventory development and service line material identification.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $3,450,000
Priority: Project/need specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Estimated operational increase of $100,000 per year associated LCRR line replacement and temporary filters.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
90 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Storage Reservoirs
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU owns and operates six raw water reservoirs that store snow run-off. SLCDPU operates Little Dell Dam, for the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy with a capital improvement budget of $400,000 for controls replacements. Little Dell and 5 of SLCDPU’s reservoirs are used to store water that is treated for drinking water. All seven of the reservoirs are a contingent way for the Department to meet exchange agreements for secondary water. Three of the reservoirs are used by ski areas for snowmaking. The raw water storage reservoir at Mountain Dell has a $6,040,000 proposed budget for outlet replacement, upstream waterproofing, and land restoration work. SLCDPU has received a 30% matching funds, grant of $265,000 in December of 2022 for engineering and planning for Lake Mary Dam’s restoration.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $6,690,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
91 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Pumping Plants & Pump Houses
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
As a result of its size and topography, the water distribution system consists of more than 50 different pressure zones. Pump stations are often connections between pressure zones, pumping treated water from one zone to another. The utility has over thirty pump stations with many still needing back-up power or generators for system resiliency. Planned projects for this fiscal year are the Arlington Hills Pump Station Full Backup Power project, $700,000, and the University Pump Station Piping Replacement and Equipment Upgrades project, $200,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $900,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
92 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Culverts, Flumes & Bridges
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
These secondary water conveyance systems are critical to maintaining our water exchange agreements. Planned projects within this category are the flume from Double Barrels to the railroad tracks for $2,200,000 and the JSL Canal Enclosure at Millcreek for $2,000,000. These projects are intended to support the long-term resiliency and reliability of systems that are critical to maintaining water deliveries.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $4,200,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
93 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Distribution Reservoirs (Tanks)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 100,000,000 gallons of finished water storage in 22 tanks and reservoirs. These components require on-going inspection and maintenance. The location and elevation of these facilities is critical to the operation of the water distribution system. The budget includes $1,850,000 dedicated to maintenance and repair of both the 15th East Reservoir and Park Reservoir structures. Other projects include slope stabilization efforts at the Canyon Cove Upper Tank, $50,000, and drainage upgrades at the Capitol Hills Tanks site, $400,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $2,300,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
94 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Water Utility)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU is evaluating properties for future use by the department. The budgeted $400,000 is to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the SLCDPU campus at the existing location or relocating the SLCDPU campus to meet existing needs and address safety concerns. This evaluation will consider the cost benefit of campus improvements and will assess the department’s ability to mitigate financial impacts by leveraging existing assets.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $400,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
95 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Treatment Plants
Project Address:1365 West 2300 North
Project Description:
The largest budgeted item in this category is for the construction of a new water reclamation facility. The $210,499,773 estimate represents the continuation of a multi-year project and includes design, construction, and program management. Existing plant improvement projects include Capital Asset Rehabilitation and Upgrades for $1,300,000, digester rehabilitation and cogeneration projects for $210,000 and $250,000 respectively. These existing plant improvements are critical to maintaining existing operations while the new water reclamation facility is commissioned.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $212,259,773
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Temporary dewatering will continue to have an operational impact in FY24 for chemical costs. The annual operational cost of wastewater treatment is anticipated to increase by $2M to $4M for power and chemical costs when the construction of the new water reclamation facility is complete and operational. This estimate will be refined as construction progresses.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
96 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Collection Lines
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU has over 667 miles of aging sewer collections pipelines. Proposed budget within this category includes pipe renewal & replacement projects, City/County/State driven projects, and master plan projects. Master plan projects are the largest budgeted item in this category and total $23,955,000. This includes $1,500,000 for the 1800 North Sewer Realignment Phase 2; $6,000,000 for 1800 North Sewer Realignment Phase 3; $12,000,000 for 2100 S Upsizing Project; and $250,000 for South Temple Upsizing Project. Master plan projects identified within this category support system condition improvements and growth related capacity constraints. Pipe renewal & replacement projects are budgeted for $2,155,000 and consist of Emergency Operations Support, 2100 S Sewer Rehab (600 E/400 E), and other small improvement projects intended to improve system operations and reliability. The budget includes $1,650,000 for capital project support, program management, and emergency projects. Project budgets to support City, County and State driven projects are estimated at $400,000 which includes Misc. Public Services Projects and the 700 N Sewer Rehabilitation design, which is to be completed in advance of the planned roadway improvements.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $23,955,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
97 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Lift Stations
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The Proposed lift station renewal and replacement program anticipates two projects for FY 2023/2024. The first of these projects includes the 5300 West Lift Station capacity improvements budgeted for $2,500,000. This project is intended to support growth within the International Center and surrounding inland port development area. The Industrial Lift Station Improvements budgeted for $250,000 are intended to improve the existing lift station operating conditions and to mitigate sanitary sewer overflows that have been experienced over the past several years.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $2,750,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
98 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Maintenance & Repair Shops (Sewer Utility)
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
SLCDPU is evaluating properties for future use by the department. The budgeted $350,000 is to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the SLCDPU campus at the existing location or relocating the SLCDPU campus to meet existing needs and address safety concerns. This evaluation will consider the cost benefit of campus improvements and will assess the department’s ability to mitigate financial impacts by leveraging existing assets.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Sewer Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $350,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible, long term operational costs to be evaluated with feasibility assessments through design.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
99 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Storm Drain Lines
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The largest item in this category is $5,730,000 for projects supporting City, County, and State driven projects, including $4,430,000 in work supporting Funding our Future streets bond projects. Other projects in this category total $1,300,000 for various collection lines and public utility defined projects to include Highland Drive storm drain improvements, northwest drain bypass to Jordan River improvements, and Emigration Creek at 1700 South improvements. Other local area projects to be completed by city crews at various locations are budgeted to be $500,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $6,230,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
100 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Riparian Corridor Improvements
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The planned riparian project for FY 2023/2024 is Emigration Creek – 1700 S Outlet Protection. Riparian vegetation will be restored and a wingwall and apron will be installed to reduce erosion in Emigration Creek. This work will accompany the rehabilitation of the 1700 S culvert which conveys Emigration Creek through the roadway.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $250,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
101 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Landscaping
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
The landscaping budget includes $50,000 for the Northwest Oil Drain canal remediation. This budget is to reserve funding for cleanup and closeout on the remediated portions of the Northwest Drain.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $50,000
Priority: Project specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
102 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Storm Water Lift Stations
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Storm water lift station work includes the design of a storm water lift station in Swede Town budgeted for $200,000. This will provide improved drainage services in Swede Town and surrounding area east of the railroad. The Northwest Drain Lift Station Reconstruction is intended to increase capacity of the Northwest Drain and is budgeted for design in the amount of $450,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $650,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
103 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Detention Basins
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Detention Basins work includes the continuation of the design of the Granary District Floodplain Mitigation and Re-Mapping Project. This project will design detention basins to be installed within the city to reduce the Granary Floodplain. The Granary District Floodplain Mitigation and Re-mapping is budgeted for $365,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Storm Water Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Fund
Enterprise Funds: $365,000
Priority: Project Specific
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Negligible
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
104 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:Street Lighting Projects
Project Address:Various Locations
Project Description:
Planned projects for FY 2023/2024 are $2,240,000 to upgrade to high efficiency lighting and other system improvements on arterial streets, collector streets, and in neighborhoods. This includes budget to hire a contractor to perform inspections on new street lighting facilities, consultant support to develop an Implementation Plan for new Master Plan related projects, and budget for improvements for base level lighting services and three enhanced lighting groups. The master plan determines and guides best practices for upgrades and new lights.
Proposal ID:
Department:Public Utilities
Project Type:
Category: Street Lighting Utility CIP Projects - Enterprise Funds
Enterprise Funds: $2,240,000
Priority: Ongoing program
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Reduce electricity costs.Replacing aging poles and wiring throughout the city.Continued research on Smart City and Lighting Control Technology.
Salt Lake City Public Utilities Capital Projects
105 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
This page intentionally left blank
Salt Lake City Redevelopment Agency
The Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City (RDA) strengthens neighborhoods and commercial districts
to improve livability, create economic opportunity and foster authentic, equitable communities. The RDA
utilizes a powerful set of financial and planning tools to support strategic development projects that
enhance the City’s housing opportunities, commercial vitality, public spaces, and environmental
sustainability. The RDA’s primary source of funds for the projects include property tax increment and
program income revenue, depending on the specific budget account.
The RDA often participates with Salt Lake City in the redevelopment or construction of city owned
infrastructure projects. As part of the RDA Budget Policy, Capital Projects are defined as any project that
anticipates multi-year funding. The allocation of funds for these projects is part of the budget approval
process and is typically contingent on the RDA Board authorizing appropriation once the specific projects
costs and details are known. Depending on the project, the timeline for this process may not follow the
City’s CIP schedule or requirements for approval.
The RDA fiscal year 2024 budget process proposes one potential City infrastructure project. The City
Creek daylighting design plan explores bringing a portion of City Creek that currently runs in a culvert
underground up to the surface just north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. The project
goals include increasing access to nature, improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding. This
$50,000 funding request will produce final construction drawings which will be used for project
implementation. Landscaping improvements and other pedestrian amenities will also be recommended
as a part of the design plan to activate the trail and create a welcoming centerpiece for the westside
community. The total cost for implementation is estimated to be between $15,000,000 and $20,000,000.
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
107 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Project Title:City Creek Daylighting
Project Address:Folsom Corridor – North Temple Project Area
Project Description:
Appropriation of funds to support a design plan to daylight (bring to the surface) a portion of City Creek that runs north of the Folsom Trail from 800 West to 1000 West. Project goals include increasing access to nature, improving water quality and mitigating surface flooding. This funding request will produce final construction drawings which will be used for project implementation. Landscaping improvements and other pedestrian amenities will also be recommended as a part of the design plan to activate the trail and create a welcoming centerpiece for the westside community. The total cost for implementation is estimated to be between $15,000,000 and $20,000,000.
Proposal ID:
Department:RDA
Project Type:
Category:
Funding Recommendations
CDCIP Board Mayor Council
General Fund $50,000
Estimated Future Maintenance and/or Operational Expense:
Impact will be determined on a case-by-case basis, but it’s anticipated that City Parks and Public Utilities will maintain the creek and associated amenities.
Salt Lake City RDA Capital Projects
108 Mayor’s Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
#Application Title CDCIP
Board
Council
District
Requested
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Social Vulnerability
Index
Sustainability
10 is Highest
PNUT Board
1 is Highest
Pavement
Condition
1 Library Plaza Structural Assessment and Visioning 104 4 $ 190,000 $ 190,000
Moderate-Low
Vulnerability NA Internal #7 Serious
2 Safer Crossings: Main St., Glendale Park, and Citywide 103.29 Citywide $ 900,000 $ 900,000 Highest Vulnerability 5 Satisfactory
3 200 East ADA and Sidewalk Improvements 103.14 5 $ 234,000 $ 234,000
Moderate-Low
Vulnerability 6 Failed
4 Transit Capital for Frequent Transit Routes / Operational Investments 101.86 Citywide $ 1,500,000 $ 1,100,000 Citywide (N/A)6 N/A
5 Complete Streets Program: 2100 South, Virginia St., and Citywide 100.71 Citywide $ 6,600,000 $ 3,293,000 Citywide (N/A)7 Failed
6 Public Way Concrete 2023/2024 100 Citywide $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Citywide (N/A)2 Ranges from Poor to
Failed
7 Livable Streets Implementation 99.14 Citywide $ 2,500,000 $ 1,350,000 Citywide (N/A)5 N/A
8 Neighborhood Byways 98 Citywide $ 800,000 $ 800,000 Highest Vulnerability 7 N/A
9 Complete Streets Reconstruction 2023/2024 97 Citywide $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 Citywide (N/A)2 Serious/Failed
10 Poplar Grove Park Full Court Basketball Expansion 96.86 2 $ 507,000 $ 507,000 Highest Vulnerability 1 Constituent #8 Fair
11 Jordan Park and Peace Gardens Cultural Landscape Report and Master Plan 96 2 $ 200,000 $- Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA Internal #5 N/A
12 Cottonwood Park Trailhead and Parklet 95.57 1 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 Highest Vulnerability NA Internal #4 Failed
13 Three Creeks West - Roadways Addendum 95.29 2 $ 850,000 $- Moderate-High
Vulnerability 1 Serious
14 Complete Streets Overlay 2023/2024 95.29 Citywide $ 3,500,000 $ 1,250,000 Citywide (N/A)2 Serious/Failed
15 Urban Trails: The Other Side Village & the 9-Line Trail 94 Citywide $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 Highest Vulnerability 5 N/A
16 Rose Park and Jordan River Recreation Hub 93.86 1 $ 495,000 $- Highest Vulnerability NA Internal #9 N/A
17 Citywide Park Restroom Planning Study/Fairmont Restroom Conceptual Design 93.43 Citywide $ 75,000 $- Lowest Vulnerability 1 Constituent #4 Poor
18 Madsen Park Improvements 93 2 $ 500,000 $- Highest Vulnerability 5 Constituent #3 Fair
19 Fire Station No. 7 Tennis and Pickleball Court Restoration and Amenities 92.57 1 $ 855,000 $ 855,000 Highest Vulnerability NA Internal #1 Failed
20 337 Park Development 92.29 4 $ 550,000 $ 550,000
Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA Internal #8 N/A
21 Rose Park Lane Beautification, Trail, and Safety Improvements 92 1 $ 840,000 $- Moderate-High
Vulnerability 4 Constituent #6 Failed
Attachment 4 - FY2024 Simplified Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log by CDCIP Advisory Board Scores
Page 1
#Application Title CDCIP
Board
Council
District
Requested
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Social Vulnerability
Index
Sustainability
10 is Highest
PNUT Board
1 is Highest
Pavement
Condition
22 Richmond Park Community Playground 92 4 $ 530,000 $ - Moderate-Low
Vulnerability NA Internal #10 Serious
23 Rose Park Lane Open Space and Trail Connection Study 91.14 1 $ 140,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA not ranked Very Poor
24 Jefferson Park Improvements 90.86 5 $ 530,000 $ 530,000 Highest Vulnerability 5 Constituent #2 Very Poor
25 Parks Bilingual Signage Installation 89.86 Citywide $ 414,000 $ 414,000 Citywide (N/A)NA Internal #6 N/A
26 Fairpark Traffic Circle Construction Phase 89.57 1 $ 497,000 $ 497,000 Highest Vulnerability 4 Satisfactory
27 North Temple Arts and Tourism District Improvements 89.14 2 $ 495,111 $ - Highest Vulnerability 5 Fair
28 Alleyway Improvements 2023/2024 87 Citywide $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Citywide (N/A)NA Serious/Failed
29 Fire Station #1 Apparatus Bay Extension 86.57 4 $ 1,148,771 $ 1,148,771 Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA N/A
30 Facilities Asset Renewal Plan FY24 85.57 Citywide $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 Citywide (N/A)7 Ranges from Poor to
Failed
31 Mill and Overlay Maintenance Pilot Program 84 Citywide $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Citywide (N/A)1 N/A
32 Sugar House Safe Side Streets Part 2 83.14 7 $ 150,000 $ - Moderate-Low
Vulnerability 3 N/A
33 Historic Restorations, Replacements, Conservation Work at International Peace Gardens 82.86 2 $ 325,000 $ 325,000 Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA Constituent #1 Poor
34 Fred and Ila Rose Wetland Preserve Improvements 82.29 2 $ 361,073 $ - Highest Vulnerability NA Constituent #9 Satisfactory/Poor
35 75-Year-Old Traffic Signal Replacement 80.14 4 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 Moderate-Low
Vulnerability NA Failed
36 Park Strip, Median, Park Irrigation/Water Reduction Strategy and Implementation 80 Citywide $ 500,000 $ - Citywide (N/A)7 Internal #3 N/A
37 Liberty and Jordan Parks Greenhouses - Revisioned 78.57 Citywide $ 242,823 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability 5 Constituent #7 Fair/Poor
38 First Encampment Park 77 5 $ 125,500 $ - Moderate-Low
Vulnerability 1 Satisfactory
39 Indiana Avenue Area - Transit & Trail Connections 76.57 2 $ 162,500 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability 6 N/A
40 Multimodal Capital Maintenance 76.43 Citywide $ 200,000 $ - Citywide (N/A)5 Ranges from Poor to
Failed
41 700 South (Phase 7, 4600 West to 5000 West) Additional Funding 72.29 2 $ 4,000,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability 2 Failed
42 800 S 1000 E Crosswalk Upgrade 70.43 5 $ 336,500 $ - Moderate-Low
Vulnerability 4 Very Poor
Attachment 4 - FY2024 Simplified Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log by CDCIP Advisory Board Scores
Page 2
#Application Title CDCIP
Board
Council
District
Requested
Funding
Recommended
Funding
Social Vulnerability
Index
Sustainability
10 is Highest
PNUT Board
1 is Highest
Pavement
Condition
43 Central 9th Streetscape Improvements 70.43 5 $ 85,000 $ - Highest Vulnerability 2 N/A
44 Sugar House Community Map Project 68.71 7 $ 93,400 $ - Lowest Vulnerability 3 Very Poor/NA
45 Phase I: Plaza 349 Life Safety, Security, and HVAC Upgrades 68.57 4 $ 2,000,000 $ - Citywide (N/A)7 Ranges from Poor to
Failed
46 Implementation of Safety Enhancements West Side Foothill Drive 67.86 6 $ 494,126 $ - Lowest Vulnerability 4 N/A
47 Reimagining 4th & 4th (4th West & 4th South) 65.57 3 $ 100,000 $ - Moderate-Low
Vulnerability 4 Satisfactory
48 11th Ave Park Pavilion, Trees, and Benches 64 3 $ 533,165 $ - Lowest Vulnerability NA Internal #2 N/A
49 New Liberty Park Crosswalks and Trails 60.14 5 $ 262,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability 4 Constituent #5 N/A
50 Sunnyside and Arapeen Signal & Safety Improvements 60 6 $ 450,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability 2 Failed
51 Wasatch Hollow Park: Engagement, Planning & Restoration 56 6 $ 500,000 $ - Lowest Vulnerability 2 Constituent #10 Fair
52 Hansen Ave - West Entrance/Exit 53.14 5 $ 470,703 $ - Highest Vulnerability 2 N/A
53 Nevada Street Reconstruction 52.71 6 $ 479,000 $ - Lowest Vulnerability 2 Serious
54 Sunnyside Pickleball Courts 49.29 6 $ 500,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA N/A
55 1200 E Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk 48 7 $ 351,000 $ - Lowest Vulnerability 1 Serious
56 Salt Lake City Pétanque 44.57 1 $ 500,000 $ - Moderate-High
Vulnerability NA N/A
57 Ensign Peak Nature Park Improvements 43.43 3 $ 210,000 $ - Lowest Vulnerability NA Poor
58 11th Avenue Park Pickleball Expansion 40.57 3 $ 502,500 $ - Lowest Vulnerability NA N/A
59 Westside Art Project N/A 1, 2,
and/or 3 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 TBD NA N/A
Attachment 4 - FY2024 Simplified Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Log by CDCIP Advisory Board Scores
Page 3
Overview of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Major Funding Sources
General Fund Dollars
(Most flexible funding source; can be spent on any project)
These are the City’s most flexible unrestricted funds available to be spent on any CIP project. The Council
transfers a portion of General Fund revenues into the CIP Fund as part of each annual budget in June.
The City collects a variety of revenue sources that all go into the General Fund such as property taxes,
sales taxes, franchise taxes, building permits and license fees, and many others. A Council audit identified
9% of ongoing General Fund revenues as an ideal funding level to help ensure the City keeps up with
capital investment needs. The City reached that 9% funding level in FY2023. In the prior two decades the
City’s annual General Fund transfer into the CIP Fund averaged closer to 7%.
Funding Our Future 0.5% Local Salt Lake City Option Sales Tax
(Critical need categories: housing, public transit, streets, and public safety; a fifth category of parks
maintenance was added in FY2023)
The 0.5% sales tax increase was authorized by the Legislature only for the capital city as part of the
State prison relocation from Draper. The City’s local option sales tax was increased as part of the
FY2019 annual budget and was branded “Funding Our Future” along with a Streets Reconstruction
Bond approved by voters (all those bond funds have now been budgeted). Prior to enacting the sales
tax increase the City conducted impact research, public hearings, open houses, workshops, letters,
online information, and other extensive outreach. The funds from the sales tax are limited to the
critical need categories as determined by the Council. The definition of the critical need categories
has evolved over the times such as expanding public safety from only police to also include 911
dispatch, fire, medical, and social workers. The number of categories was originally four and a fifth
category, parks maintenance, was added in FY2023. There is no legal limitation to the categories
which are subject to the Council’s annual appropriation process and subject to change.
Class C Funds
(State gas tax)
Class C funds are generated by the Utah State Tax on gasoline. The state distributes these funds to local
governments on a center lane mileage basis. The City’s longstanding practice has been to appropriate
Class C funds for the general purpose of street reconstruction and asphalt overlays. The Roadway
Selection Committee selects specific street segment locations as recorded in the Engineering Division’s Six
Year Pavement Plan which is regularly updated. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this
funding source and the County Quarter Cent Sales Tax for Transportation and Streets Funding.
Per state law, Class C funds may be used for:
1. All construction and maintenance on eligible Class B & C roads
2. Enhancement of traffic and pedestrian safety, including, but not limited to: sidewalks, curb and
gutter, safety features, traffic signals, traffic signs, street lighting and construction of bicycle
facilities in the highway right-of-way
3. Investments for interest purposes (interest to be kept in fund)
4. Equipment purchases or equipment leases and rentals
5. Engineering and administration costs
6. Future reimbursement of other funds for large construction projects
7. Rights of way acquisition, fencing and cattle guards
8. Matching federal funds
9. Equipment purchased with B & C funds may be leased from the road department to another
department or agency
10. Construction of road maintenance buildings, storage sheds, and yards. Multiple use facilities
may be constructed by mixing funds on a proportional basis
11. Construction and maintenance of alleys
12. B & C funds can be used to pay the costs of asserting, defending, or litigating
13. Pavement portion of a bridge (non-road portions such as underlying bridge structure are not
eligible)
County Quarter Center (0.25%) Sales Tax
(Limited to transportation and streets eligible uses per state law)
The County fourth quarter-cent transportation funding is an ongoing sales tax funding source dedicated
to transportation and streets. The City has taken a progressive view of transportation beyond a vehicle-
focused perspective and uses a multi-modal, more inclusive approach (walking, biking, public transit,
accessibility and ADA, ride-share, trails, safety, scooters, etc.). The Wasatch Front Regional Council
summarized eligible uses for this funding as “developing new roads or enhancing (e.g., widening) existing
roads; funding active transportation, including bike and pedestrian projects; or funding transit
enhancements. It can also be used for maintenance and upkeep of existing facilities.” (SB136 of 2018
Fourth Quarter Cent Local Option Sales Tax Summary June 22, 2018). Revenue from the 0.25% sales tax
increase is split 0.10% for the Utah Transit Authority or UTA, 0.10% for cities and 0.05% for Salt Lake
County as of July 1, 2019 and afterwards. Note that there is overlap in eligible uses between this funding
source and Class C funds.
Impact Fee Eligibility
(Four types: fire, parks, police, and transportation / streets)
Impact fees are one-time charges imposed by the City on new development projects to help fund the cost
of providing infrastructure and services to that new development. This is part of the City’s policy that
growth should pay for growth. A project, or portion of a project, must be deemed necessary to ensure the
level of service provided can continue with the additional impacts of the new developments (such as
serving more residents or workers). As a result, it’s common for a project to only be partially eligible for
impact fee funding (the growth-related portion) so other funding sources must be found to cover the
difference. It is important to note that per state law, the City has six years from the date of collection to
spend or encumber under a contract the impact fee revenue. After six years, if those fees are not
encumbered or spent then the fees are returned to the developer with interest.
General Impact Fee Guidelines:
1. Impact fees are to be used to keep a current level of service for new growth to a City.
2. Cannot be used to cure deficiencies serving existing development.
3. May not raise the established level of service in existing development.
4. Cannot include an expense for overhead, such as any cost for staff/administration, operation, and
maintenance.
5. Impact fees can only be used to pay for the portion of the project directly attributable to growth
(it’s uncommon for projects to be 100% eligible for impact fees).
6. Must be incurred or encumbered within 6 years from the date they are collected, or they shall be
returned to the developer with interest payments per state law.
7. Must use an adopted Impact Fees Facilities Plan to determine the public facilities needed to serve
new growth and set fees costs by development type.
8. Repair and replacement projects are not growth related.
9. Upgrade projects are not growth related.
10. Repair, replacement, or upgrades can be included as part of a mixed project where the scope will
create increased capacity to serve projected growth.
11. Impact fees must be spent in the same geographic boundary (service area) in which they are
collected. The City’s Impact Fee Facilities Plan designates the entire city as the service area. The
Transportation section was updated in 2020. The other three sections were adopted in 2016.
Funding
Source
Cost
Center Description Remaining
Appropriation Complete?If Not Complete, Status?
8319062 Deteriorated or Missing Concre $209.89
Total $209.89
8314031 Driver Feedback Signs $86,320.00
8317032 Bridge Maintenance Program $21,518.62
8317036 Street Improvements: Reconstru $2,219.83
8317359 Gladiola to Indiana 900S Seq C $112,657.56
8318023 Gladiola 900 S Imp $38,047.09
8319504 Street Reconstruct 1500S/2700S $8,281.62
8320501 Streets Reconstruction 20 $1,497.88
8320502 Street Overlay 20 $99,454.82
8320503 Traffic Signal Upgrades 20 $0.74
Total $369,998.16
8300800 ESCO Steiner - County Ongoing $439,527.00
8317076 SLVSWMF Projects $132,043.12
8319705 ZAP Oak Tennis Pro $4,721.20
8319710 Trans Choice 9 Line $62,203.69
8319720 Millcreek Sugarhouse County $27,021.29
8320070 FY20 Landfill Monitoring $207,402.00
Total $872,918.30
8314094 West Salt Lake Master Plan Imp $8,598.00
8314104 Genesee Trailhead Acquistion $234,427.36
8314105 Fisher Mansion Carriage House $12,039.79
8315083 Wakara Way/Arapeen Dr Donation $35,565.72
8317064 Jordan River Trail – Union P $500,000.00
8321800 Community Nutrition Hub $75,462.02
8322633 200 South Dominion Donation $300,000.00
8323401 Backman Community Donation $20,000.00
8600071 Smith Ballfield Naming Rights $374,908.15
8619621 Transportation Safety Improvem $630.25
Total $1,561,631.29
8315015 Fire Station #14 furnishings $6,265.96
8315027 Bikeway - Close the gap $25,335.87
8316046 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr $103,181.93
8316070 Warm Springs Park, 840 N 300 W $13,194.60
8317025 500/700 S Reconstruction $476,232.86
8317029 Bus Stop Enhancements $16,990.39
8317043 Parks and Public Lands Compreh $7,343.15
8317049 UTA TIGER GRANT MATCH $21,634.16
8317055 Capital Facilities Plan $4,928.32
8318028 Bridge Maintenance $76,503.76
8318044 East West Connections Study $970.74
8318045 Bikeways Urban Trails $57,732.81
8318047 Rose Park Pedestrian Byway $24,336.20
8318048 Miller Park ADA access $364,735.10
8318049 Jordan R. Flood Control $4,432.91
8318053 Parks and Rec HVAC $9,900.00
8318084 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - CIP $110,104.00
8319085 Cost overrun $56,027.29
8319301 Delong & Parks Yard Improvemen $20,915.09
8319401 Glendale Park Playground Path $43,476.17
8319403 RAC Shade Structure and Playgr $1,428.58
CDBG
Class C
County
Donations
Funding
Source
Cost
Center Description Remaining
Appropriation Complete?If Not Complete, Status?
8319405 Rose Park Multiloop Trail $148,007.23
8319406 11th Ave Pavilion and Signage $39,545.97
8319616 Whitlock Curb and Gutter $18,909.88
8319619 1900 East Reconsruction $68,502.51
8319621 Traffic Signals Upgrade $0.68
8319622 1400 E Sunnyside Intersection $64,662.90
8319701 Library Parking Equipment $59,576.57
8319721 Millcreek Sugarhouse GF $485.95
8319741 WestsideMultimodal GF $29,657.50
8319900 Transportation Acctg SalesTax $2,241.02
8320085 Cost overrun $70,381.00
8320401 Liberty Park 7 Cany Fountain $695,580.27
8320402 Hidden Hollow Water Enhancemen $379,928.03
8320404 10 E Senior Ctr Retaining Wall $2,378.51
8320405 Libert Prk Drainage Fueling S.$94,837.45
8320406 Community Parks Signage $248,665.00
8320407 Three Creeks Con Phase III $492,800.00
8320432 Liberty 7 Canyons Fountain $127,968.00
8320442 Match UT FHA Foothill Trails $144,106.12
8320602 Bus Stop Signal Enhancements $772,947.60
8320603 McClelland Str Phase 2a $124,740.00
8320701 Sorensen Unity Connecting Corr $875,000.00
8381200 OPEN SPACE LAND MATCHING $11,600.00
8395046 OPEN SPACE LAND TRUST $9,103.01
8600001 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT - GF $598,685.20
8600005 Crime Lab Rent $101,842.10
8600040 Percent for Art $255,895.77
8600042 Maintenance Percent for Art $43,133.35
8600401 Parks Maintenance $206,898.27
8600402 Public Lands Maintenance FOF $1,170,528.45
8600701 Facilities Maintenance $451,424.24
8600702 Facilities Asset Renewal $964,847.78
8619402 City-wide Park Walkway Safety $5,386.33
8619409 Fairmont Stream Access Beautif $17,000.00
8619411 Westside Trail Connections $249,922.91
8619602 Bridge Maintenance $150,000.00
8619603 Saw Cutting Sidewalk -$33.59 Why is this negative?
8619624 1700 S Lane Reconfiguration $35,322.27
8619625 Sunnyside 9 Line Trail $3,342.01
8620608 Sugarhouse 600 E Traffic Calmi $149,068.28
8620621 Bridge Maintenance $250,000.00
8686058 Elections Expenses $91,546.00
Total $10,672,104.46
8405005 Public Safety Building Replcmn $0.28
8406001 Gladiola Street $2,244.33
8412002 Indiana Ave/900 S Rehab Design $124,593.18
8416004 1300 S Bicycle Bypass (pedestr $42,832.69
8416005 9line park $4,420.71
8417011 Marmalade Park Block Phase II $73,264.60
8417012 Parley's Trail Design & Constr $327,678.45
8417013 Rosewood Dog Park $1,055.97
General Fund
Funding
Source
Cost
Center Description Remaining
Appropriation Complete?If Not Complete, Status?
8417014 Redwood Meadows Park Dev $9,350.26
8417017 Jordan R Trail Land Acquisitn $2,945.50
8417018 Jordan R 3 Creeks Confluence $1,569.60
8418002 Cwide Dog Lease Imp $261.73
8418003 Bikeway Urban Trails $181,845.59
8418005 Bridge to Backman $251,757.84
8418016 500 to 700 S $22,744.01
8419008 Traffic Signal Upgrades $450.00
8419103 ImperialParkShadeAcct'g $6,397.50
8419150 Pioneer Park $3,022,323.09
8419201 Eastside Precint $21,639.09
8419202 Fire'sConsultant'sContract $58.00
8419203 Street'sConsultant'sContract $12,374.31
8419204 Park'sConsultant'sContract $42.00
8420110 Transp Safety Improvements $32,028.03
8420120 Complete Street Enhancements $18,699.37
8420125 Street Improve Reconstruc 20 $383,308.67
8420134 Jordan Prk Event Grounds $399,055.66
8420136 9Line Orchard $142,612.29
8420138 Rich Prk Comm Garden $8,103.29
8420142 Wasatch Hollow Improvements $413,726.49
8420406 IF Prop Acquisition 3 Creeks $54,807.56
8420420 UTGov Ph2 Foothill Trails $121,329.10
8420424 Cnty #1 Match 3 Creek Confluen $110,390.48
8420430 FY20 Bridge to Backman $117,628.28
Total $5,911,537.95
8600002 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT -$27,171.28 Why is this negative?
Total -$27,171.28
8316079 University bikeway $1,200.80
Total $1,200.80
8318100 Fire Training Center $19,313.38
8319801 PolicePrecinctLandAquisition $1,299,688.00
8381600 Regional Sports Complex land p $489,836.03
8381750 Building Assessment - City Bld $19,602.62
Total $1,828,440.03
$208,275,255.98
Impact Fees
Land Sales
Private
Donations
Sale of
Property
Grand Total
Capital Asset Plan (CAP) Council Requests from January 2019
1.Policy Goals and Metrics – Council Members requested high-level cost estimates for the City
to implement the below policy goals as well as any metrics. The Administration was invited to
recommend policy goals to the Council. Three cost estimates are included based on prior
discussions but may not represent the best currently available information. The table is intended
for discussion purposes and does not represent a comprehensive list of policy goals for Council
consideration.
Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-level Cost
Estimate
Bring all facilities out of
deferred maintenance
Appropriations vs. funding
need identified in Public
Services’ Facilities Dashboard
that tracks each asset
$6.8 million
annually or $68
million over ten
years
Expand the City's urban trail
network with an emphasis on
East-West connections
Total paved/unpaved network
miles; number and funding
for improved trail features;
percentage of 9-Line
completed
$21 million for 9-
Line
implementation
Increase the overall condition
index of the City's street
network from poor to fair
Overall Condition Index
(OCI); pavement condition
survey every five years
$133 million cost
estimate (in addition
to existing funding
level)
Implement the Foothill Trails
Master Plan
Distance of improved trails
completed; number and
funding for improved
trailheads
$TBD
Advance the City's
sustainability goals through
building energy efficiency
upgrades
Energy savings; carbon
emission reductions $TBD
Focus on renewal and
maintenance projects over
creating new assets
Number, funding level and
ratio of renewed assets vs.
new assets
$TBD
2.Project Location Mapping – Council Members requested a map of all CAP projects. The idea
of multiple maps based on dollar value was discussed such as $50,000 - $999,999, $1 million - $5
million, and over $5 million.
3.Measure CAP to CIP Alignment – Council Members expressed support for annually
measuring the alignment of how many CIP Funding Log projects were previously listed in the
CAP and how many CIP projects receiving appropriations were previously listed in the CAP. A
high alignment would indicate the CAP is successfully identifying the City’s capital needs.
4.Council Adoption of CAP – The question arose if the Council should adopt the CAP each year
with the annual budget or potentially in the summer when reviewing project specific funding.
Does the Administration have a preference?
Parks 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate 2022 Estimate 2023 Estimate
Trailside Pit Toilet $150,000 $168,000 $200,000 $220,000
Portland Loo (each) Existing Sewer Line $200,000 $224,000 $270,000 $290,000
4 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $350,000 $450,000 $550,000 $585,000
8 Seat Each Gender. Existing Sewer Line $550K - $600K $700,000 $850,000 $915,000
Site Master Plan $50K - $75K $75,000-$100,000 $90,000-$115000 $75,000-$115,000
Cultural Landscape Report $75,000-$150,000 $90,000-$175,000 $75,000-$175,000
City-wide Comprehensive Study $150K - $250K $200,000-$300-000 $230,000-$350,000 $200,000-$350,000
Installed with sewer connection $15K - $30,000 $35000- $50,000 $45,000-$62,500 $45,000 -$65,000
Playground Replacement $150K - $250K $250,000-$350,000 $300,000-$450,000 $325,000-$455,000
New Playground $150K - $250K $450,000-$550,000 $550,000-$650,000 $585,000-$715,000
Native soil field $150,000 $400,000-$500,000 $450,000-$550,000 $525,000-$650,000
Sand-based field $400,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,300,000
Softball/Baseball Field Improvements (Each Field)$200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $325,000
Fencing (6 ft. vinyl coated chain link)$45.00-$55.00/LF $54.00-$65.00 $58.00-$70.00/LF
Patch, repair and paint $150,000 $168,000 $210,000 $220,000
New post tension court $250,000 $300,000 $360,000 $400,000
Hand-built natural surface single track trail (40" width)$6-12/LF $25.00-$30.00/LF $30.00-$35.00 $32.50-$40.00/LF
Machine-built natural-surface trail (40" width)$20-25/LF $10.00-$15.00/LF $13.00-$18.00 $13.00-$20.00/LF
Asphalt Trail $3.50/SF $5.00/SF $7.00/SF $10.00/SF
Concrete Trail (6" thick)$4.50/SF $8.00/SF $12.00/SF $15.00/SF
Soft Surface - Crushed stone $2.50/SF $6.00-$10.00/ SF $8.00-$13.00/SF $10.00-$15.00/SF
Off-leash Dog Parks $250K - $350K $ 280,000-$392,000 $330,000-$460,000 $365,000-$500,000
Irrigation Systems Per Acre $52,000+$75,000 +$85,000+$90,000+
Tree Replacements (Each 2-inch caliper)$350 $750 $600 $750
Natural Area Restoration Per Acre $100K - $200K $ 112,000- $224,000 $135,000-$250,000 $145,000-$275,000
Transportation 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate 2022 Estimate 2023 Estimate
Bike - One Mile Cycle Track/Lane Mile (3 lane miles =
1.5 actual miles)500,000+$600,000+$ 700,000 $746,000
Bike - One Lane Mile (2 lane miles = 1 mile actual mile)2,000+$2,500+$ 4,000 $4,300
Bike - Protected Lane Mile (200 West 2015)$400,000 $500,000-1,000,000 $750,000-$1,250,000 $799,000-$1,331,000
Traffic Signals - New $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000 $426,000
Traffic Signals - Upgrades $ 250,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000 $426,000
HAWK Signals $ 130,000 $ 150,000 $ 175,000 $350,000
Drinking Fountains
Multi-purpose Field Improvements
Tennis Court Improvements (2 Courts)
Path/ Trail Improvements
Regular CIP Project Costs; General Rules of Thumb
NOTE: Costs are estimates based on most recent information available (could be out of date), vary by project, and do not include ongoing maintenance
Restrooms (dependent on site and utility work)
Studies
Crosswalk - Flashing $ 60,000 $75,000 $85,000 $90,000
Crosswalk - School Crossing Lights $ 25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $37,000
Crosswalk - Colored/Stamped varies based on width of
road $15K - $25K $18,000-$27,000 $20000 - $30000 $21,500 - $32,000
Driver Feedback Sign $ 8,000 $9,500 $11,000 $12,000
Speed Table / Raised Crosswalk $ 25,000 $30,000 $40,000 $43,000
Pedestrian Refuge Island $ 10,000 $12,000 $15,000 $16,000
Curb Extension at Intersection $ 20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $32,000
Crosswalk $ 1,600 $1,800 $2,000 $2,200
Streets 2019 Estimate 2021 Estimate 2022 Estimate 2023 Estimate
Asphalt Overlay (Lane Mile)$ 280,000 $ 335,000 $ 360,000 $587,000
Crack Seal (Lane Mile)$ 5,000 $ 6,000 $ 8,000 $11,000
Road Reconstruction - Asphalt (Lane Mile)$ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 700,000 $761,000
Road Reconstruction - Asphalt to Concrete (Lane Mile)$700k - $1.2 M $840,000 - $1,440,000 $1,000,000 - $1,700,000 $1,088,000 - $1,811,000
Sidewalk slab jacking (per square foot)$ 4 $5 $6 $7
Sidewalk replacement (per square foot)$ 7 - $10 $8 - $12 $9 - $15 $ 12 - $17
Note: Last updated July 2023
Livable Streets Traffic Calming Program First Year Accomplishments Summary
From the Transportation Division
-Hired four new transportation planners.
-Worked with the Administration and City Council to change the prima facie speed limit from 25 mph
to 20 mph. Additional 20 mph signs are currently being prepared for installation near elementary
schools throughout the city.
-Updated the Livable Streets and Transportation Safety web pages.
-For Livable Streets Zone 1, phase 1 of the traffic calming project for the Capitol Hill area has been
awarded and will be constructed this summer.
-Our first public meetings were held this spring for Livable Streets Zones 2, 3 and 4.
-Speed bumps to be installed on 2100 East and 1300 South. The project has been awarded and will
be constructed this summer.
-The Slow Down West Sugar House project has been awarded and will be constructed this summer.
-Temporary traffic calming devices were installed in the Sugar House Safe Side Streets project area.
-As part of the Emery Street Livability Improvement Pilot Project, temporary traffic calming devices
have been installed on Emery St with more on the way over the next couple of weeks.
-Extensive work has been performed to update the crosswalk flag program.
-Livable Streets enhancements were installed at a school crosswalk located at 2150 E Westminster
-A roundabout has been designed for 700 S 1000 W. The project is currently being prepared for
advertisement to obtain contractor bids.
-In-roadway crosswalk warning signs were installed at multiple locations.
Zone Prioritization and Status Based on Funding Level
The prioritization of the zones hasn’t changed, therefore the overall map remains the same. Since this
program is so new, we’re still working off estimates of the amount of funding each zone will require for
their Livable Streets improvements. If we assume that the average of each zone will be $500K, then,
based on the original $2M plus the new $1.35M funding will provide us with enough funding for
approximately $3.35M/$500K = 6.7 Zones, or about six or seven zones. The attached map highlights the
locations of the top 7 Livable Streets zones. We’re already working on Zones 1-4. Based on these
assumptions, the FY2024 $1.35 million request will fund all or a portion of the projects in zones 5, 6 and
7.
Note, the color coded prioritization map on the following page is from the Livable Streets Program 2022
Final Report page 13. Council staff added zone numbers one through seven to help compare the two
maps. An interactive version of the zones map is available on the Transportation Division’s website here:
https://www.slc.gov/transportation/plans-studies/livable-streets/#LivableStreetsProjects
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
Attached you can find a map that shows every completed job from 2020 concerning the 50/50 and
commercial program as well as a few tables and charts that break down the data.
50/50 Program 2020-Present
Council District Estimates Sent Jobs Completed Percent
1 68 14 21%
2 35 11 31%
3 265 108 41%
4 42 21 50%
5 115 35 30%
6 263 124 47%
7 271 117 43%
Total 1059 430 41%
Table 1: Shows quantity of 50/50 estimates sent vs jobs completed broken down by Council District.
Commercial Program 2020-Present
Council District Estimates Sent Jobs Completed Percent
1 3 0 0%
2 9 2 22%
3 38 11 29%
4 32 6 19%
5 14 5 36%
6 6 3 50%
7 7 4 57%
Total 109 31 28%
Table 2: Shows quantity of commercial estimates sent vs jobs completed broken down by Council District.
Attachment 10 - 50/50 Concrete Program Utilization Summary
Figure 1: Data collected from 2020-present that shows the percentage of constituents that paid after an estimate was sent by
Council District.
Figure 2: Data collected from 2020-present that shows the percentage of constituents that paid after an estimate was sent by
Council District.
Figure 3: The data represented is broken down by Council District and shows the amount of jobs completed per district and the
cost associated with those jobs.
Figure 4: The data represented is broken down by Council District and shows the amount of jobs completed per district and the
cost associated with those jobs.
CAP Plan,
Matrix, &
Policy
Goals/Metrics
Council Briefing
July 18, 2023
Presented by Mary Beth Thompson,
Aaron Price, and Mike Atkinson
Capital Asset Planning Model
Funding Sources
Funding Source Description
Transportation Fund Quarter Cent Sales Tax - Transportation and Streets projects
Bonds General Obligation and Revenue
Special Assessment Area Central Business District - Economic Promotion
Grants Federal, State, County
Class C Roads State Gas Tax
General Fund Most flexible funding source, can be spent on any project
Public/Private Partnerships Potential future funding source
Impact Fees Fire, Parks, Police, and Transportation/Streets
Donations Individuals and foundations
Capital Asset Plan Elements
Division Master Plans Division specific documents
RDA & Public Utilities Input Strategic Collaboration
10 Year Division
Capital Planning Long-term capital planning
Annual Constituency
Requests
Reviewed to align with
internal requests & not
ranked
Impact Fee Facilities Plans Determine Impact Fee
Eligibility
Capital Asset Plan
Funding Sources
Committees
Finance
Committee
Provide detailed
information on
Funding Sources
CAP Committee
Internal project
ranking and
submittal to CDCIP
Board
CAP Committee Scoring
General Fund
Capital Asset Plan
CAP Manager
Funding Sources
Final Scoring & Budget
Finance
Committee
CAP Committee
Once projects have
been evaluated by the CAP
Committee, they are forwarded to
the CDCIP Board for
recommendation to the Mayor
and City Council.
Mayor City Council
Criteria Critical
Failure
Legal
Obligation
Risk: Life,
Health &
Safety
Outside
Funding
Completed
Project
Design
Promote
Equity
Environmental
Conservation Beautification Efficient
Investment
Workforce
Support
Community
Request
Points
(0-4):4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Y/N
[Project
Name]
Submitting a request:
When submitting a request, please provide answers to the following questions in addition to any information
available related to the criteria.
1. Describe the project.
2. What is the problem the department is trying to solve?
3. Who will the project serve, and how will it improve services?
4. What is the requested timing of project completion, and what is the implication if the request is delayed or denied?
5. Is this a replacement or a new capital asset project?
6. Is there an estimated cost at this time?
7. What is the current annual maintenance and the estimated future annual maintenance?
8. Has the capital asset project been scoped?
9. Has the capital asset project been designed?
*Criteria has been developed in accordance with Resolution 29 of 2017 and the Mayor's Goals of: Our Growth, Our
Environment, Our Communities, Our City Family.
CAP Matrix*
2019 Council Policy Goals and Metrics
Potential Policy Goals Potential Metrics High-Level Cost Estimate
Bring all facilities out of deferred
maintenance
Appropriations vs. funding need identified in
Public Services’ Facilities Dashboard that
tracks each asset
$6.8 million annually or
$68 million over ten years
Expand the City's urban trail network
with an emphasis on East-West
connections
Total paved/unpaved network miles; number
and funding for improved trail features;
percentage of 9-Line completed
$21 million for 9-Line
implementation
Increase the overall condition index of
the City's street network from poor to
fair
Overall Condition Index (OCI); pavement
condition survey every five years
$133 million cost estimate
(in addition to existing
funding level)
Implement the Foothill Trails Master
Plan
Distance of improved trails completed;
number and funding for improved trailheads $TBD
Advance the City’s sustainability goals
through building energy efficiency
upgrades
Energy savings; carbon emission reductions $TBD
Focus on renewal and maintenance
projects over creating new assets
Number, funding level and ratio of renewed
assets vs. new assets $TBD
2023 Mayor Goals – CIP Related
Our Environment
•Work with the City’s Sustainable Infrastructure Steering Committee to draft and propose internal
policy requiring capital projects to consider environmental justice impacts and incorporate green
and sustainable infrastructure.
•Complete Foothills Trails Master Plan evaluation and Plan addendum in collaboration with key
stakeholders and indigenous leaders.
Our Community
•Develop a 5-Year Strategic Plan for Planned Growth to more effectively utilize impact fees for
community benefits.
•Complete the Neighborhood Byway Design Guidebook and finish design and/or construction of at
least four neighborhood byways throughout the city.
•Implement action items on the Vision Zero program to reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities.
•Propose adoption of Life on State to improve transportation and land uses along the corridor.
THANK YOU
Presented by Department of Finance
CAP Matrix*
Cri�cal Failure:
When reviewing this criterium, par�cular focus should be paid to whether the request will
prevent a cri�cal failure of a structure. Does this project follow the Sustainability Ordinance?
Legal Obliga�ons:
When reviewing this criterium, considera�ons include coming into compliance with ordinances
and execu�ve orders, various contractual agreements, or state and federal mandates.
Risk: Life, Health, and Safety:
When reviewing this criterium, par�cular focus should be paid to whether the request will
correct various types of code viola�ons or increase safety/reduce crime.
Outside Funding:
This criterium assesses whether there is outside funding support for a par�cular ini�a�ve,
including federal and state grants, coordina�on with other agencies, public/private
partnerships, or dona�ons. When analyzing outside funding, it should be noted how much of
the funding will s�ll need to be provided by the City in addi�on to any outside support.
Project Design Complete:
This is in accordance with Resolu�on Number 29 of 2017 which states, "The Council intends to
follow a guideline of approving construc�on funding for a capital project in the fiscal year
immediately following the project's design wherever possible. Project costs become less
accurate as more �me passes. The City can avoid expenses for re-es�ma�ng project costs by
funding capital projects in a �mely manner.”
Promote Equity:
Considera�on should be given to underserved areas of the city in order to improve the
infrastructure of the city as a whole ("close the gap amongst neighborhoods") rather than
improving some areas and allowing others to deteriorate. A map showing the condi�on of the
infrastructure of the city could help in performing this analysis.
Environmental Conserva�on:
This criterium involves analyzing whether a project provides environmentally sustainable
solu�ons or helps preserve natural resources (watersheds, rivers, green space, etc.)
Efficient Investment:
The main considera�ons for efficient investment are whether a project func�ons to increase
revenue or reduce expenses. Projec�ons on this front should be as accurate as possible and
veted through the Department of Finance.
Workforce Support:
This criterium focuses on whether a project supports the physical, mental, or economic well-
being of City employees, in keeping with the Mayor's goal of suppor�ng "Our City Family".
Beau�fica�on:
This relates to aesthe�c improvements including Art incorpora�on, Historic Preserva�on, Site
Beau�fica�on, and other opportuni�es that express the City's value for the arts and improving
quality of life through projects that go beyond func�onal efficiency.
Community Request:
While the financial limita�ons of any municipality inhibit the ability to act on every request - the
concerns and desires of our residents are vital to understanding how best to allocate our limited
resources, therefore, projects that are closely aligned with community requests should be given
proper considera�on.
*Criteria has been developed in accordance with Resolu�on 29 of 2017 and the Mayor's Goals
of: Our Growth, Our Environment, Our Communi�es, Our City Family.
CITY COUNCIL OF SALT LAKE CITY
451 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM 304
P.O. BOX 145476, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84114-5476
SLCCOUNCIL.COM
TEL 801-535-7600 FAX 801-535-7651
COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CITY COUNCIL of SALT LAKE CITY
TO:City Council Members
FROM: Jennifer Bruno & Allison Rowland
Council Staff
DATE:August 8, 2023
RE: ORDINANCE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND LOAN TO LEAVITY, LLC, 47
SOUTH ORANGE STREET #B1, SALT LAKE CITY 84116
ISSUE AT-A-GLANCE
The Council will consider approving a loan from the City’s Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) to a
business called Leavity LLC, a start-up local wholesale sourdough bread bakery based in District 1. The City’s
Economic Development Loan Committee recommends the Council approve a $100,000 loan at 10.5% interest
over seven years to this business for equipment. This loan will assist in the creation of 1 new job and the
retention of 1 existing job.
For context, the nationwide median small business commercial and industrial loan rates for the fourth quarter
of 2022 (the most recent data available), were 6.44% for fixed-rate loans, and 7.44% for variable rate loans,
according to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s Small Business Lending Survey.i These rates were 4.14% and 4.32%,
respectively in the first quarter of that year.
The application from Leavity, LLC, meets the following EDLF program goals:
•Increases employment opportunities;
•Stimulates business development;
•Promotes economic development;
•Enhances neighborhood vitality; and,
•Boosts commercial enterprise.
The EDLF is a program administered by the Department of Economic Development, which is charged with
maintaining the corpus of the EDLF in a manner sufficient to perpetuate the goals of the program. Each loan
application is pre-screened, and an underwriting analysis and economic impact statement are completed before
Item Schedule:
Briefing: August 8, 2023
Public Hearing: N/A
Potential Action: August 15, 2023
Page | 2
an application may be recommended for Loan Committee (see below) review. Information on successful
applications is transmitted to the Council for final approval.
Goal of the briefing: Consider a potential $100,000 loan from the Economic Development Loan Fund to a
business called Leavity, LLC.
ADDITIONAL AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.EDLF available balance and amount of outstanding loans. The Finance Department reported the
available fund balance at $8,619,138 as of June 30, 2023. Outstanding loans totaled $ 2,256,764.
B.EDLF Committee Membership. The Department of Economic Development listed nine members of the
EDLF Committee as follows:
City Employees
1. Finance Director, Community and Neighborhoods Department
2. Representative of the Mayor’s Office
3. Salt Lake City employee at large
4. Representative of the Division of Housing Stability
5. Director, Department of Economic Development
Community Volunteers
1. Salt Lake City Business Advisory Board (BAB) member
2. Banker
3. Community lender
4. Business mentor
POLICY QUESTIONS
1. The Council may wish to have a policy discussion with the Administration about interest rates charged
by the City from this and other loan funds, and whether it makes sense to re-evaluate how interest rates
are determined for lenders, especially since the City typically offers loans as a lender-of-last-resort.
2. The Council may wish to ask the Administration whether the EDLF Committee considered any other
unique information about this business that would help Council Members with their own evaluations of
how this application compares to others. For example, are there risk factors that are evaluated for each
company, like outstanding loans, years in business, etc.?
3.What outreach does the Department do to ensure a diverse pool of businesses successfully applies to the
EDLF? Are applications from diverse owners, particularly those whose businesses are located on the
Westside, offered additional support through the application process? Does EDLF staff have ideas for
improving access that would benefit from program changes or additional funding?
4. The Council may wish to request a more general update on EDLF use and processes. This could include
the number of applications, review criteria used, loan program goals, etc.
Page | 3
i Source: Small Business Lending Survey, Federal Reserve, 2028D, item 7.c. Consulted on April 26, 2023, at
https://www.kansascityfed.org/surveys/small-business-lending-survey/small-business-ci-lending-
increases-from-previous-quarter-but-declines-year-over-year/.
DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ERIN MENDENHALL
MAYOR
LORENA RIFFO JENSON
DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL
_______________________ Date Received: 7/18/2023
Lisa Shaffer, Chief Administrative Officer Date sent to Council: 7/18/2023
__________________________________________________________________
TO:Salt Lake City Council DATE: July 14, 2023
Darin Mano, Chair
FROM:Jacob Maxwell, Deputy Director, Department of Economic Development
SUBJECT:Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund (EDLF) Leavity LLC
STAFF CONTACTS:
Roberta Reichgelt, Business Development Director, Roberta.reichgelt@slcgov.com
Peter Makowski, Project Manager, peter.makowski@slcgov.com
DOCUMENT TYPE: Loan Approval
RECOMMENDATION: The EDLF Loan Committee recommends approval of $100,000
loan to Leavity LLC.
BUDGET IMPACT:$100,000 from the Economic Development Loan Fund
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:On June 8, 2023, a loan request from Leavity LLC was
presented to the EDLF Loan Committee for review and discussion. The Loan Committee voted to
recommend the loan for City Council consideration. Leavity is a wholesale sourdough bread
bakery.
Basic Loan request
Business Name: Leavity LLC
Address: 47 S. Orange St, #B1, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Loan Amount Requested: $100,000
Loan Term: 7 years
Interest Rate: 10.5%
Use of Funds: Equipment
Loan Type: Start up
Reasoning behind staff recommendation
Applicants of The Economic Development Loan Fund (EDLF) go through a thorough application
process consisting of a pre-screening, underwriting analysis and economic impact statement. The
Lisa Shaffer (Jul 18, 2023 15:28 MDT)
loan applicant goes through these processes, then the loan is reviewed by the Loan Committee
members. Upon the thorough review of the Loan Committee members, the Loan Committee votes
whether to make a recommendation to the City Council. If so, the loan is transmitted to the
Council for final approval. Because the Loan Committee review process must adhere to the Utah
Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA)
is followed.
In addition, the EDLF loans must meet the goals of the Economic Development Loan Fund as
stated in the EDLF program guidelines. This loan meets the EDLF program guidelines in the
following areas.
1. Increasing employment opportunities
2. Stimulating business development
3. Encouraging private investment
4. Enhancing neighborhood vitality and
5. Boosting commercial enterprise
This loan will assist in the creation of 1 new job in the next year and retention of 1 current job.
This loan was recommended by the EDLF Committee to the City Council for approval.
EDLF Loan Balances
1. As reported from The Finance Department on June 30, 2023, the EDLF
available fund balance: $8,691,138
2. The amount of outstanding loans total is: $2,256,763.51
EDLF Loan Committee
There are a total of nine (9) EDLF Committee members.
City Employees:
1. Community and Neighborhoods Finance
2.
3. Employee at large
4. Housing Stability
5. Economic Development
Community Volunteers:
6. Business Advisory Board (BAB) member
7. Banker
8. Community lender
9. Business mentor
Attachments: Ordinance and Terms Sheet
LOAN TERM SHEET
Applicant: Leavity LLC
Address: 47 S Orange St., #B1, Salt Lake City, Utah 84116
Proposed Loan Terms
Loan Amount: $100,000
Loan Term: 7 Years
Interest Rate Calculation Prime Interest Rate: 7.50% (at the time of application on 1/6/2023)
EDLF Charge: 4%
Less Discount: 1%
Priority Area - West of I-15
Final Interest Rate: 10.50%
Use of Funds: Equipment, Working Capital
Business Type: Food and Beverage
Collateral and Guarantees: Equipment
Personal Guarantees: Todd Bradley - Owner
Conditions for Closing: Obtain all City approvals, execute all loan documents as deemed necessary by
City legal counsel and DED staff, such other terms as recommended by City legal counsel and DED staff
July 13, 2023
City Council Announcements
August 8, 2023
For Your Information:
A. Schedule for Tuesday, September 5th meetings:
As a reminder, the Council planned to have their Council group photo
taken on Tuesday, September 5th. The Mayor/Council Chair/V-Chair
meeting is that same day from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. prior to the Work
Session.
➢To accommodate the schedule, the Work Session will begin at 2:30
p.m., following the Council photo appointment.
SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION
SWORN STATEMENT SUPPORTING CLOSURE OF MEETING
I, ____________ , acted as the presiding member of the _______________________________in which met on _________
Appropriate notice was given of the Council's meeting as required by §52-4-202.
A quorum of the Council was present at the meeting and voted by at least a two-thirds vote, as detailed in the minutes of
the open meeting, to close a portion of the meeting to discuss the following:
§52-4-205(l)(a) discussion of the character, professional competence, or physical or mental health of an
individual;
§52 -4-205(1 )(b) strategy sessions to discuss collective bargaining;
§52-4-205(l )(c) strategy sessions to discuss pending or reasonably imminent litigation;
§52-4-205( l )(d) strategy sessions to discuss the purchase, exchange, or lease of real property, including
any form of a water right or water shares, if public discussion of the transaction would: (i) disclose the
appraisal or estimated value of the property under consideration; or (ii) prevent the public body from
completing the transaction on the best possible terms;
§52-4-205(l )(e) strategy sessions to discuss the sale of real property, including any form of a water right
or water shares if: (i) public discussion of the transaction would: ((A) disclose the appraisal or estimated
value of the property under consideration; or (B) prevent the public body from completing the transaction
on the best possible terms; (ii) if the public body previously gave public notice that the property would be
offered for sale; and (iii) the terms of the sale are publicly disclosed before the public body approves the
sale;
§52-4-205(1)(f) discussion regarding deployment of security personnel, devices, or systems; and
§52-4-205(1)(g) investigative proceedings regarding allegations of criminal misconduct.
A Closed Meeting may also be held for Attorney-Client matters that are privileged pursuant to Utah Code
§78B-1-137, and for other lawful purposes that satisfy the pertinent requirements of the Utah Open and
Public Meetings Act.
Other, described as follows: ____________________________________________________________
The content of the closed portion of the Council meeting was restricted to a discussion of the matter(s) for which the
meeting was closed.
With regard to the closed meeting, the following was publicly announced and recorded, and entered on the minutes of the
open meeting at which the closed meeting was approved:
(a)the reason or reasons for holding the closed meeting;
(b)the location where the closed meeting will be held; and
(c)the vote of each member of the public body either for or against the motion to hold the closed meeting.
The recording and any minutes of the closed meeting will include:
(a)the date, time, and place of the meeting;
(b)the names of members Present and Absent; and
(c)the names of all others present except where such disclosure would infringe on the confidentiality
necessary to fulfill the original purpose of closing the meeting.
Pursuant to §52-4-206(6),a sworn statement is required to close a meeting under §52-4-205(1)(a) or (f), but a record by
tape recording or detailed minutes is not required; and Pursuant to §52-4-206(1), a record by tape recording and/or
detailed written minutes is required for a meeting closed under §52-4-205(1)(b),(c),(d),(e),and (g):
A record was not made.
A record was made by: : Tape recording Detailed written minutes
I hereby swear or affin11 under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
Presiding Member Date of Signature
Salt Lake City CouncilVictoria Petro August 8, 2023
4
44
Victoria Petro (Aug 15, 2023 14:41 MDT)08/15/2023
Closed Session - Sworn Statement
Final Audit Report 2023-08-15
Created:2023-08-08
By:Michelle Barney (michelle.barney@slcgov.com)
Status:Signed
Transaction ID:CBJCHBCAABAAdJXG7BNKsk1np_yQ7mJfVgyADpktorBR
"Closed Session - Sworn Statement" History
Document created by Michelle Barney (michelle.barney@slcgov.com)
2023-08-08 - 10:55:29 PM GMT
Document emailed to victoria.petro@slcgov.com for signature
2023-08-08 - 10:59:27 PM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2023-08-09 - 4:40:40 PM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2023-08-10 - 5:24:48 AM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2023-08-11 - 4:13:36 AM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2023-08-13 - 5:44:59 AM GMT
Email viewed by victoria.petro@slcgov.com
2023-08-15 - 3:42:40 AM GMT
Signer victoria.petro@slcgov.com entered name at signing as Victoria Petro
2023-08-15 - 8:41:13 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Victoria Petro (victoria.petro@slcgov.com)
Signature Date: 2023-08-15 - 8:41:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server
Agreement completed.
2023-08-15 - 8:41:15 PM GMT